Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05/02/2023 - Formal Meeting - Meeting Materials
a " w � w ## It SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL and REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY and LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY FORMAL MEETING AGENDA May 2, 2023 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council Work Room 451 South State Street, Room 326 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Darin Mano, Chair Victoria Petro,Vice Chair District 5 District 1 Alejandro Puy Chris Wharton Ana Valdemoros District 2 District 3 District 4 Dan Dugan Amy Fowler District 6 District 7 Generated: 13:53:44 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI-Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4. The Council will approve the retreat meeting minutes of January 31, 2023. 5. Mayor Mendenhall will present the proposed Salt Lake City budget, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Ordinance: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area.This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1(Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU(Gateway Mixed-Use), CG(General Commercial) and the FB- UN1 and FB-UN2 (Form based districts).Additionally,the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures,while developing standards for public spaces.The Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00529. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/dovmtovmbuildingheights FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 18, 2023 and Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets,including proposed project additions and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Grant Application: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program Fiscal Year 2oi8-2o23 The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation and Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded this grant would fund the Salt Lake City traffic signal synchronization.The aim is to minimize the diversion of traffic to local and residential streets by installing radar detection equipment at an estimated 31-key intersections. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. C. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would establish a process for approving future Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in the City and modify existing standards for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters. The Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. This petition was initiated by the City Council through Ordinance 15B of 2022. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01o68 The proposal includes: • A Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District; • Modifications to city ordinance 21A.36.350 Standards for Homeless Resource Centers; • Provisions for temporary/seasonal homeless resource centers that incorporate recent changes to Utah Code; • Modifications to city ordinance 21A.50 to include additional considerations when mapping the HRC overlay and other related changes; and • Updated defined terms. For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/HRCTextAmendment FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Ordinance: Rezone at'792 West goo South and 875 South 800 West The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 792 West goo South and 875 South 800 West from M-1 (Light Manufacturing District)to R-MU(Residential/Mixed Use District).The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings.No development plans have been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.The properties are within Council District 2. Petitioner: Cameron Broadbent, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00587 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,April 18, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). D. COMMENTS: 1. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) E. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement and Memorandum for 2o23 Election Services The Council will consider approving a resolution for an election services interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County. It defines the services the County will provide the City for the 2023 General Election,through the Ranked Choice Voting method,on November 7, 2023.The City will be responsible for any additional charges exceeding the estimated cost such as a recount which would be invoiced to the City after the election. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Resolution: Naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the Senator Garn Greeting Room The Council will consider adopting a resolution supporting Mayor Mendenhall naming of the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the"Senator Garn Greeting Room" after former Salt Lake City Mayor and Utah Senator Jake Garn. Senator Jake Garn was elected Salt Lake City Commissioner in 1967 and Mayor in 1971. He went on the serve three terms as a United States Senator from 1974-1992• FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Resolution: Local Emergency Declaration Extension — Flooding The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor's April 12, 2023 proclamation declaring a local emergency relating to flooding from spring runoff. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Tentative Budget of Salt Lake City, including the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund,for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah,including the tentative budget of the Library Fund,for Fiscal Year 2023- 24. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). G. CONSENT: 1. Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 9)for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 9)for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 2. Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board—John Wilson The Council will consider approving the appointment of John Wilson to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 3. Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board—Matilyn Mortensen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Matilyn Mortensen to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4. Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board— Ross Chambless The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ross Chambless to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board—Annie Quan The Council will consider approving the appointment of Annie Quan to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6. Board Reappointment:Arts Council— Kathy Davis The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Kathy Davis to the Arts Council for a term ending May 2, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7. Board Reappointment:Arts Council—Torle Nenbee The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Torle Nenbee to the Arts Council for a term ending May 2, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 8. Board Reappointment: Utah Performing Arts Center Agency(UPACA) — Deirdre (Dee-dee) Darby-Duffin The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Deirdre(Dee-dee) Darby- Duffin to the Utah Performing Arts Center Agency(UPACA)for a term ending May 2, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 9. Board Reappointment: Mosquito Abatement Board—Neil Vickers The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Neil Vickers to the Mosquito Abatement Board for a term ending December 31, 2027. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation -Approve. H. ADJOURNMENT: LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. I. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1. The Board will approve meeting minutes of May 18, 2021; June 1, 2021; June 15, 2021; August 17, 2021; May 3, 2022; May 17, 2022; June 7, 2022; and June 14, 2022. J. LBA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24• The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.)The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities,like libraries,to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks,public buildings, and street projects. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). K. LBA ADJOURNMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. L. RDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2o23-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). M. RDA ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 2:00 P.M. on Friday,Arpril 28, 2023,the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and(2)a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City&County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance.To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600,or relay service 711. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 PENDING MINUTES — NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,met on Tuesday,January 31, 2023 for a Work Session Retreat. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros,Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan,Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton,Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative Leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson—Executive Director,Jennifer Bruno — Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver— Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto — Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Cindy Lou Trishman—City Recorder,Michelle Barney—Minutes&Records Clerk The meeting was called to order at 1:20 pm 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 City Council Retreat Minutes: Council Member Mano welcomed those present and outlined the Council Retreat design; each Council Member may have time to outline their priorities for discussion of the full Council to unify the direction for the 2023 calendar year. Interests&Priorities shared by individual Council Member Council Member Dugan, District Six • Public Safety,relationships with the community through training • Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs),Thriving in Place and Accessory Dwelling Units • Mental health for homeless and underserved(example—Miami Project) • Advocate for Building Code Compliance • School Lunch programs • Sustainability—incorporate fees to drive efficiency for air quality and water conservation (Vision Zero) • Inland Port and Northpoint area emphasis on water preservation • Mobility and Motion—Trainbox, obtain the east-west connections • UTA free fares for K-12 and teachers —requested statistics of current use • Safe Streets —increase pedestrian safety,changing the structure of lights and crossing areas, reduce potholes, red-light camera possibilities to reduce fatalities in crosswalks • Parks — address the parks overall,including Bonneville Shoreline,Miller Bird park and Wasatch Hollow, and addressing off-leash dogs and maintenance Council Members discussed: • Housing fee schedule • Reimbursement of University of Utah fees for Public Safety services • Red light cameras-potential effects and potential support • Next steps for Trainbox(feasibility study) and prioritizing infrastructure Council Member Wharton, District Three • Opportunity in Ballpark area; permanent supportive housing for LGBTQ,veterans, and individuals experiecing homelessness • Historic Landmark Signage(requested status) • Traffic calming, exhaust noise policies • Iconic Art Installation(privately funded option) • Landscaping ordinance,water-wise • Increase penalties for non-permitted building construction • Eviction defense for residents to keep people housed • Support the International Market at Fairpark • Ensure the studies and plans for the Foothills Trails were complete • Evaluation of the Park Ranger program • Zoning to allow distilleries in downtown • Fund the cemetery master plan and improvements to Memory Grove, specifically the monuments • Prepare for I-15 widening— address concerns before the construction commenced,the affected communities should be accommodated for the loss of any property Council Members discussed: 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 • Invite the International Market group to provide a briefing update on the program including how the $1 million (funded by Council)was used and did the state contribute any funds to the program • Arts/mural program • If the City would run the program or just make way for murals to happen • Redevelopment Agency(RDA)mural program and the Arts Council involvement, timeframe for mural creation • Addressing yearly priorities of the RDA to make murals a priority and possibly include them in the scorecard for a project • Zoning for downtown distilleries Council Member Valdemoros joined the meeting at 1:57pm. Council Member Valdemoros, District Four • Individuals experiencing homelessness support • Assist/address mental health • Encourage people to work in the industry • Continue working with the industry to help the people in the City while working with the Service Providers to ensure funding was being used in the best way possible, • Statistics of who was served and what services were still lacking • Housing—keeping naturally occurring affordable housing affordable, maintaining the affordable housing stock • Open Streets • Dilapidated properties,incentivizing care • Public Market at the Rio Grande building • International Market was received well by the Community • Systematic Auditing of city programs for efficiency and effectiveness Council Members discussed: • Finding ways to support people who live in naturally affordable housing • Creating options to help people update their homes Council Member Mano welcomed the Mayor to the retreat Mayor Mendenhall shared she was there to listen, announced the release of the City's goals, reviewed how the goals aligned with the Council's goals and expressed excitement to work with the Council moving forward Council Member Mano, Distict Five • Zoning Ordinance Rewrite due to complexity • Best practices for changing the zoning citywide and the most effective way possible Council Members discussed: • Potential Benefits to the City of a Zoning Rewrite: • Allowance for more high-density construction • Less zoning change requests • Simplify the ordinance language • Consolidating or eliminating special exceptions and conditional uses • Hiring a consultant to assist with this process (the first step in the process) 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 • Consult with other cities who have completed a rewrite and their evaluation of success • Funding and guidance needed Break: 2:33 pm to 2:40 pm Council Member Petro, District One • Financial vibrancy&Equity for the City • Consider transformative revenue streams • Strategic investments-training fire, dispatch, and police • Being proactive in all areas, similar to the Perpetual Housing fund • Addressing grants that create issues with future financing • Streamlining and efficiency for all City Departments and programs Council Members discussed: • Consideration of point-of-sale sites in manufacturing areas • Grant funding effects on the general budget and ensuring a long-range plan was addressed • Changing the grant review/approval process to allow for additional time to review and understand funded programs and requests for additional employees Council Member Puy, District Two • Westside Train crossings conditions; technology to address traffic issues and routes • Economic Development for the City • Assist with improvements and support of the Fairpark property for the continuance of the International Market • Working with the Legislature in a more uniform way • Zoning/permitting processes need to be simplified • Environment issues—address plastic bag ordinance • Sprinkler rebates for those that make improvements to sprinkler systems • Refineries need to be more efficient and water-wise • Bring Arts to the Westside • Individuals experiencing homelessness support: • Ordinances related to code blue and code red(temperature gauge) • Constraints on police taking people to the hospital • Assisting those with mental health • Addressing the safety in and around the Jordan River • Salt Lake City and County Building: • Rename the building to Salt Lake City Hall • Focus on Safety with a plan to protect the building itself • Improvement to the Council kitchen Council Members and Cindy Gust-Jenson discussed: • Options to address police and homeless individuals needing hospitals and if it could be turned over to the civilian response team • Code blue ordinance and who should be funding the services • Plastic bag initiative Council Member Fowler, District Seven: • Policing: Review of existing policies; consider body cam review requests and outside internal affair audits 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 • Alternatives to addressing homelessness; keeping people housed, review increasing renter and mortgage assistance programs and review access • Review RV use policy and procedure;to deter towing and impound • Working with the formerly incarcerated and criminal justice to help individuals with housing and employment, and decriminalizing activity • Neighborhood branding • Changing the mobile business ordinance, allowing for a variety of mobile services • City-wide dog naming contest for the Council Dream Dog statue Council Members discussed: • Programs in other Cities/states that work with formerly incarcerated individuals regarding training, schooling, and housing • Finding locations for parking RVs • LGBTQ, Senior and Veteran housing: • Miami Project: addressed homelessness,mental health issues, and housing The City's role in this type of program(more of a case manager role) • How to best organize the Council's priorities to be most effective and achieve the goals Council Members,Jennifer Bruno and Cindy Gust-Jenson reviewed/discussed • Mayor's Office handout regarding the goals of the City • How to incorporate the goals of the Council with the goals of the Administration which would assist in moving similar items forward • Promoting commercial spaces on lower levels of RDA developments and the possibility of the City being the control entity of the commercial spaces • Assigning RDA staff to work with the mixed-use developments (in RDA areas)to develop spaces for businesses who were looking for spaces to rent • Amending the TSA zoning and adding more points for commercial spaces • Public Transportation and moving people to and from the airport and other areas in the City • How to focus on the different goals,give them all proper attention and get the greatest return • The Council had the most power when working as a group therefore,working through the items and getting everyone on the same page was the best option • Next steps would include the information provided today and plans to meet again to address the top priorities Standing Item: Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but not limited to: a. discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if- (i)public discussion of the transaction would: (A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code§ 78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Item not held 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 31, 2023 Meeting adjourned at 4:22 pm Minutes Approved: City Council Chair City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes)for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting.Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday,January 31, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. 7 * Mayor s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 s , 1 This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents MAYOR AND COUNCIL MESSAGES Page: MAYOR'S MESSAGE 5 SALT LAKE CITY PROFILE SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION ORGANIZATION 9 SALT LAKE CITY AT A GLANCE 11 SALT LAKE COMMUNITY PROFILE 14 SALT LAKE CITY BUDGET-IN-BRIEF 18 MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET BUDGET SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35 FY 2023-24 CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET 42 GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES 53 OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES 67 LEA KEY CHANGES 82 RDA KEY CHANGES 83 MULTI-AGENCY DRUG TASK FORCE KEY CHANGES 93 FINANCIAL POLICIES DEBT POLICIES 97 DEBT STRUCTURE 100 REVENUE 104 FY 2022-23 LEGISLATIVE INTENTS 124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OVERVIEW 143 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2023-24 PROJECTS LIST 149 DEPARTMENT BUDGETS OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL 157 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 161 DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 165 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 171 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS 177 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 183 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 189 FIRE DEPARTMENT 195 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES 201 DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES 207 JUSTICE COURT 215 POLICE DEPARTMENT 221 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS 227 1 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Table of Contents DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES 235 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 245 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 251 DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY 255 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 259 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 263 STAFFING DOCUMENT STAFFING DOCUMENT INTRODUCTION 273 STAFFING DOCUMENT SUMMARY 275 STAFFING DOCUMENT DETAIL 276 APPENDIX APPENDIX A: LIBRARY 321 APPENDIX B: HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS&RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 337 2 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Mayor's 6m low- io, elk. 41. AA io .00 __/' i^. �� ^� �% ,(jam`. `.i •� - ^� i%� Jv ` � -���'`� 1 „/ This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Mayor Messages Dear Salt Lake City, It continues to be an incredible time to live and work in Salt Lake City.Our residents are amazing,our economy remains strong,and opportunities continue to come our capital city's way. This budget,like the three that came before it,focuses on my administration's four priorities: • Prioritizing growth that equitably benefits ALL city residents; • Making our city more environmentally resilient and sustainable; • Bolstering our communities with inclusive and equitable opportunities for all; and • Supporting City employees'physical,mental and economic well being,because our City team is what makes everything possible. Over the past three years,we've laid out an ambitious framework of expanded affordable housing investments,innovative new public safety programs,continued environmental protections and significant investments in our City staff.This budget builds upon that groundwork by expanding upon key initiatives that will improve quality of life,while also being fiscally responsible. What follows is a balanced budget that does just that.It responds to the needs and requests of our residents while also planning for the future.It's a continuation of a three-year budget plan that will allow our City to thrive today while also investing in necessary infrastructure improvements that will ultimately benefit us all in the future. One of the developments I'm most proud of is the continued evolution of how we construct our budget.This year,City departments used a unified template that helped our budget team more clearly understand their proposals.It's just another step we're taking as we continue the transition to project-based budgeting,which will help reduce costs and ensure fewer redundancies across our City budget each year. I want to give special thanks to this year's budget committee.Chief Human Resources Officer Debra Alexander,Chief Information Officer Aaron Bentley,Director of Public Utilities Laura Briefer,Chief of Staff Rachel Otto,Chief Administrative Officer Lisa Shaffer,and Director of Communities and Neighborhoods Blake Thomas each brought expertise and passion for our City to this work. And,of course,special thanks to our Chief Financial Officer,Mary Beth Thompson,and the entire Finance Department team,who work incredibly hard each year to ensure that our City's budget is balanced,responsible,and reflective of our City's goals.Thanks so much to each of you for your dedication and commitment to this budget process. E. e.,--� Mayor Erin Mendenhall 5 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor Messages This page intentionally left blank 6 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake Ci* Profile Y.• - � d s s .�"• f': era r .q:- �.• t� - •�• YT} 4 �4 J' 41 4 µ ��'� L-•il���' �•^ tt 'Pt' off C. '.0 �• i, '��.� � •.�r K,. •i' �• ? .fG .i �^7j( ` .!a �y pia � L� �1yp� �• � �.. ''C_Y�r. �,r,ry• y r r •+fib , '� ,Y•'?'. wf;•, b._ ►�� ♦J � ' {any >:: ���r" - ..T• � • '�� S• r �. GL io,�'Y•. f ,/ .t•� TJ j n _ _ '.may'•- This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief SALT LAKE CITY ELECTED OFFICIALS Fiscal Year 2023-24 Erin Mendenhall COUNCILCITY x� AJ a. Victoria Petro Alejandro Puy Chris Wharton (Vice-Chair) District 1 District 2 District 3 - 4 Ana Valdemoros Darin Mano Dan Dugan Amy Fowler District 4 (Chair)District 5 District 6 District 7 9 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief o00 CITIZENS OF SALT LAKE CITY ..............................:................................................................................... 888 ❑ ❑ LIBRARY JUSTICE COURT Debbie Ehrman OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Curtis Preece OFFICE OF THE Interim Director Erin Mendenhall I Mayor Director OFFICE COUNCIL .................................................................................................................. 1. Victoria Petro CHIEF ADMIN 911 DISPATCH (Vice Chair) OFFICER CHIEF OF STAFF 2. Alejandro Pu Rachel Otto Stephen Meyer J Y Lisa Shaffer Director 3. Chris Wharton .................................................................: 4. Ana Valdemoros DEPT.OF AIRPORTS DEPT.OF FINANCE 5. Darin Mano Bill Wyatt ............. Mary Beth Thompson (Chair) Director Chief Financial Officer 6. Dan Dugan 00 7. Amy Fowler DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEPT.OF PUBLIC SERVICES &NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas I Director Jorge Chamorro Director COUNCIL STAFF Cindy Gust-Jenson Executive Director OFFICE OF THE DEPT.OF INFORMATION CITY ATTORNEY •••••• ••••• MANAGEMENT SERVICES Katie Lewis I City Attorney Aaron Bentley I CIO FIRE DEPT. (DEPT.OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Karl Lieb •••••• ••••• Laura Briefer Chief Director DEPT.OF POLICE DEPT. HUMAN RESOURCES ..... ••••• Mike Brown Debra Alexander I Director Chief DEPT.OF ECONOMIC DEPT.OF SUSTAINABILITY DEVELOPMENT ............. Debbie Lyons Lorena Riffo-Jenson Director Director REDEVELOPMENT DEPT.OF PUBLIC LANDS AGENCY Kristin Riker Danny Walz I Director Director 10 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief SALT LAKE CITY AT A GLANCE Dz 176 YEARS 172 YEARS Date Founded Date Incorporated July 24, 1847 January ig, 1851 ...................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................... MAYOR 111 .1 COUNCIL SQ. MILES Form of Government Since 1980 Total City Area ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................... 000 200 567 4j327 FT. 202o Estimated Population Average Elevation (1,319 Meters) 11 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief _ 4 S2el ° F 28e2 0 F 77eO 0 F (11.2 Q MEAN (-1.6 Q January (25.0 Q JULY Average Daily Temperatures ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... a444 S8.S INCHES 16,S INCHES (1,486 MM) (419 MM) Average Annual Snowfall Average Annual Rainfall 12 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS DISTRICT 3 Chris Wharton o N DISTRICT 1 Victoria Petro �/ DISTRICT 4 Ana Valdemoms =S * DISTRICT 6 :: :.. :::;. ;.;.::::;::. DISTRICT 5 Dan Dugan Darin Mano DISTRICT 7 Amy Fowler MAP LEGEND DISTRICT 1: Victoria Petro DISTRICTS: Darin Mano DISTRICT 2: Alejandro Puy DISTRICT 6: Dan Dugan �j DISTRICT 3: Chris Wharton \\\\\\\ DISTRICT 7: Amy Fowler DISTRICT 4: Ana Valdemoros 13 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CALENDAR Fiscal Year 2023-24 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 01 PERSONAL SERVICES JANUARY PROJECTED, REVENUE ESTIMATED 01 01 DEPARTMENTS RECEIVE GUIDANCE DEPARTMENTS DEVELOP SERVICE FEBRUARY ON BUDGET DEVELOPMENT FROM POLICY ISSUES AND BUDGET MAYOR'S OFFICE REDUCTION OPTIONS DEPARTMENTS PRESENT MARCH - APRIL PROPOSALS TO MAYOR AND BUDGET OPTIONS DEVELOPED PROVIDE BRIEFINGS TO CITY COUNCIL ABOUT SERVICES APRIL MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET PREPARED MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET CITY COUNCIL REVIEWS MAYOR'S MAY PUBLISHED AND PRESENTED TO RECOMMENDED BUDGET, BUDGET CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 2ND PUBLIC HEARINGS ON MAY 9TH, 16TH,AND/OR MAY 30TH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW MAYOR'S FINAL BUDGET HEARINGS JUNE RECOMMENDED BUDGET TRUTH-IN-TAXATION HEARING AUGUST HELD AND BUDGET AND TAX RATE ADOPTED ON SEPTEMBER 1ST SEPTEMBER- PERPETUAL REVIEW,AND DECEMBER PERIODIC AMENDMENT 14 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief ; $1 ,828y7S4j107 1437% RECOMMENDED BUDGET FY 2024 INCREASE •• Redevelopment Agency Included in the Other Enterprise Fund Amount. 15 Mayor's 24% GENERAL FUNDS 7% _ 2% CIP�FUNDS entFunds) OTHER �% ENTERPRISE FUNDS* ALL OTHER FUNDS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 29% 28% AIRPORT PUBLIC UTILITIES ENTERPRISE FUND ENTERPRISE FUNDS Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief All City Appropriated Funds FY 2024 Recommended Expenditure Budget .................................................................................................... GOVERNMENTAL PROPRIETARY FUNDS FUNDS ............................ ........................... ........................................................... CAPITAL GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE PRO IN PROJECTS FUNDS FUNDS SJ I...... V ...... $444,504,923 EER ICE FUNDS $29,034,160 4 ..................................... ......... AIRPORT FLEET ........... .......... $520,438,997 $32,498,750 DEBT SPECIAL 00...... ........ SERVICE FUNDS REVENUE FUNDS GOVERNMENTAL GOLF IMMUNITY .......... .......... $17,938,984 $3,370,012 CURB&GUTTER .......... CDBG $5,597,763 $3,000 REFUSE INFO MGMT .......... .......... SERVICES $28,493,792 $38,556,941 DEBT SERVICE EMERGENCY 911 .......... $34,894,979 $3,800,385 WATER INSURANCE& RISK M $177,953,787 .......... GMT ......... 5 1 MISC GRANTS $62,205,7jj 1 .......... OPERATING $7,390,097 SEWER $301,832,622 MISC SPEC. .......... SERVICE DISTRICTS $1,700,000 STORM WATER $22,947,474 OTHER .......... SPECIAL REVENUE $400,000 STREET LIGHTING .......... $6,044,149 DONATION FUND .......... $500,000 HOUSING LOANS &TRUST .......... $955,000 TRANSPORTATION $9,700,000 RDA $75,077,827 16 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief .................................................................................................................................................................................._.................................................................... $444s504,923 4e45% GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES I INCREASE 1% 2% Economic Development Mayor's Office Council Office Attorney's Office Justice Courts 3% Human Resources — 911 Communications Finance Department • 6% Public Lands 7% 27% Community& Non Neighborhoods Departmental 10% Public Services 25% 12% Police Department Fire Department ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. GENERAL FUND REVENUE BY TYPE FY 2024 2 Q Property Taxes with $ Q 6 /Q Pilot 1 /Q Fines &Forfeitures 0 q0S37Q/Q Sales &Use Taxes 1 Q/Q Intergovernmental 0 3Q/Q Franchise Taxes 1 Q/Q Charges &Fees El 9Q/Q Licenses&Permits © 1 Q/Q Parking ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief •t r k •� Syr F i� , .. .� ��C� . . .* _ i - 1PL a. f 4 7 r t r is•. I.• � F r f ■y1�� BudgetminmBrief Salt Lake City's budget is comprised of several different types of funds, including General Fund, Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds. Enterprise funds, unlike the General Fund, are not supported by property or sales taxes. Revenues in these funds come primarily from fees charged for services provided. For instance,the Airport derives a large portion of its revenues from landing fees. It is worth noting that the Airport expenditures have increased dramatically due to the Terminal Redevelopment Program. The City also has a number of internal service funds such as Fleet and Information Management Services. Internal service funds exist to account for the financing of goods and services provided by one City agency or department to another. ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief CITYWIDE EXPENDITURES FY 22 Adopted FY 23 Adopted FY 24 Increase/ Percent Fund Type Budget Budget Recommended Decrease from Change Budget FY 22 Adopted General Fund 367,582,070 425,537,407 444,504,923 18,967,516 4.46% Airport Enterprise 706,792,500 384,681,671 520,438,997 135,757,326 35.29916 Fund Public Utilities 420,480,027 413,124,942 508,778,032 95,653,090 23.15916 Enterprise Funds Other Enterprise 112,441,729 128,758,874 122,465,603 (6,293,271) (4.89)910 Funds Internal Service Funds 108,266,464 118,806,965 136,631,414 17,824,449 15.00916 Capital Improvement 29,760,910 35,460,387 29,034,160 (6,426,227) (18.12)916 Program(CIP)Funds All Other Funds 69,819,732 83,363,494 66,900,978 (16,462,516) (19.75)916 Total 1,815,143,432 1,589,733,740 1,828,754,107 239,020,367 15.04916 FY 2022 AND 2023 ADOPTED BUDGETS AND FY 2024 RECOMMENDED BUDGET 800,000,000 — 700,000,000 — 600,000,000 — 500,000,000 — 400,000,000 — 300,000,000 — 200,000,000 — 100,000,000 — 0 General Fund Airport Public Other Internal Capital All Other Enterprise Utilities Enterprise Service Funds Improvement Funds Fund Enterprise Funds* Program(CIP) Funds Fund 0 FY 22 Adopted Budget 0 FY 23 Adopted Budget — FY 24 Recommended Budget *Redevelopment Agency Included in the Other Enterprise Fund Amount. 19 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES General Fund FY 22 Adopted FY 23 Adopted FY 24 Increase/ percentage Departments Budget Budget Recommended Decrease from Change Budget FY 23 Adopted Economic 2,714,915 3,695,620 4,035,091 339,471 9.19% Development Human Resources 3,267,669 4,236,836 4,659,300 422,464 9.97% Justice Courts 4,850,906 5,199,660 5,489,720 290,060 5.58% Council Office 4,551,159 5,387,707 5,960,249 572,542 10.63% Mayor's Office 4,761,780 6,625,451 6,820,067 194,616 2.94% Attorney's Office 8,029,302 9,007,633 10,150,844 1,143,211 12.69% Finance 8,767,757 10,709,847 12,168,296 11458,449 13.62% Department 911 Communications 9,016,380 10,872,140 11,259,756 387,616 3.57% Bureau Public Lands 18,751,871 24,229,676 27,162,271 21932,595 12.10% Community& 24,003,823 29,311,147 32,039,953 2,728,806 9.31% Neighborhoods Public Services 34,341,928 39,398,484 43,105,409 3,706,925 9.41% Fire Department 45,587,400 48,586,492 52,264,357 3,677,865 7.57% Police Department 83,370,502 103,977,042 110,976,812 6,999,770 6.73% Non Departmental 115,566,677 124,299,673 118,412,797 (5,886,876) (4.74)% Total 367,582,069 425,537,408 444,504,923 18,967,514 4.46% 20 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 3,695,620 4,236,836 5,199,660 5,387,707 a, E 6,625,451 ao 3 9,007,633 m a) 10,709,847 0 10,872,140 a N -24,229,676 r 29,311,147 39,398,484 48,586,492 0 Economic Development 103,977,042 Human Resources 0 Council Office "124,299,673 0 Justice Courts _Mayor's Office Attorney's Office _Finance Department 911 Communications Bureau Public Lands 4,035,091 0 Community&Neighborhoods 4,659,300 Public Services 5,489,720 Fire Department Police Department a) 5,960,249 _Non Departmental a, a 6,820,067 -0 = 10,150,844 a, 2 12,168,296 a, E - 11,259,756 0 -27,162,271 v } 32,039,953 43,105,409 52,264,357 110,976,812 25,000,000 50,000,000 75,000,000 100,000,000 125,000,000 21 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 2024 Non-departmental 27% Police Public Services 2S% 1 ,le Public Lands 6% 0 / Community& >� Neighborhoods `Finance // 7% 911 Communications 3% i% 12% Economic Development Council Office Justice Courts Human Resources Mayor's Office Attorney's Office Fire 22 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY TYPE - 2017-24 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Budget Budget Property Taxes 89,071,896 90,414,308 94,654,243 99,342,715 99,474,985 101,822,469 111,118,729 114,073,622 w/PILOT Sales and Use 62,776,248 67,940,454 99,403,846 116,199,002 122,654,953 160,262,167 149,414,487 166,213,479 Taxes Franchise 28,418,423 28,418,423 27,238,435 26,863,146 23,952,168 11,750,309 11,657,128 12,348,127 Taxes Licenses& 35,004,151 30,608,768 36,960,240 32,637,293 36,428,067 43,313,623 40,736,114 40,878,104 Permits Fines& 6,728,836 5,567,814 3,316,215 3,753,706 3,539,471 3,717,871 3,765,174 4,063,548 Forfeitures Intergovernme 6,855,998 5,791,774 6,066,496 5,086,254 4,781,753 5,960,591 4,644,622 5,134,621 ntal Charges&Fees 5,358,872 5,671,710 5,573,679 4,283,760 4,842,902 5,840,601 4,432,794 4,881,922 Parking 3,436,592 3,404,582 3,509,898 2,771,331 1,915,888 2,997,333 2,635,475 2,801,089 Other Revenue 36,270,649 39,643,865 38,231,125 49,561,874 51,980,733 68,352,888 97,132,885 94,110,411 Total Operating 273,921,665 277,461,698 314,954,177 340,499,081 349,570,920 404,017,852 425,537,408 444,504,923 Revenue 23 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY TYPE 2017 2024 c 0 r FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Budget FY 2024 Budget Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals Actuals 0 Property Taxes w/PILOT -Sales and Use Taxes -Franchise Taxes -Licenses&Permits Fines&Forfeitures 0 Intergovernmental Charges&Fees -Parking 0 Other Revenue ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... This stacked bar graph depicts the starting in FY 2019 due to the various types of revenue collected recently implemented Funding for the Salt Lake City General Fund Our Future 0.5% increase in Salt zDfl and how some of these revenues Lake City's sales tax rate.The have fluctuated over the years. It Other Revenue category has also is worth noting that sales tax been impacted by American revenues have increased markedly Recover Act grant funds. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND REVENUE - FY 2023 ADOPTED V. 2024 REC'D BUDGETS General Fund Revenue FY 2023 Adopted FY 2024 Rec'd Increase/ Percentage Budget Budget Decrease Change Property Tax 109,480,507 112,168,049 2,687,542 2.45% RDA Related Property Tax 15,532,420 15,985,753 453,333 2.92% Sales and Use Tax 149,414,508 166,213,479 16,798,971 11.24% Franchise Tax 11,657,128 12,348,127 690,999 5.93% Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,638,222 1,905,573 267,351 16.32% Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644,622 5,134,621 489,999 10.55% Charges for Services 4,432,794 4,881,922 449,128 10.13% Other Revenue 81,468,620 69,184,043 -12,284,577 (15.08)% Interfund Transfers In 24,431,717 26,131,213 1,699,496 6.96% Available Fund Balance/Cash 22,836,870 30,552,143 7,715,273 33.78% Reserves Total 425,537,408 444,504,923 18,967,515 4.46% FY 2024 GF Revenue Available Fund Balance/ Property Tax 112,168,049 Cash Reserves 30,552,143 Ilk RDA Related Property Tax Interfund Transfers In 15,985,753 26,131,213 Other Revenue 69,184,043 Sales and Use Tax Charges for Services 166,213,479 4,881,922 Franchise Tax Intergovernmental Revenue 12,348,127 5,134,621 25 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief GENERAL FUND REVENUE Fiscal Year 2024 37% 2S% 16% 6% Sales Use&Taxes Property Taxes Other Revenue Interfund Transfers In ® �y O O O 7% 4% 3% 1 % Available Fund RDA Related Franchise Taxes Intergovernmental Balance//Cash Property Tax Reserves P 1 % O% Charges for Service Payment in Lieu of Taxes 26 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Am►- F f alp �r mot ,w• r .nY � a • Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief HISTORY OF TOTAL PROPERTY TAX RATE (2013-2023) 0.0060 0.0055 Property Tax Rates in Salt Lake City o.0050 According to Utah State Code, municipalities cannot assess 0.0045 properties for more property tax revenue than was generated in the previous year, with the exception of 0.0040 new growth.As property values generally increase or decrease, property tax rates fluctuate accordingly.The accompanying 0.0035 graph (on the right) demonstrates how the boom in property values in the City affected the property tax rates that were 0.0030 assessed during the earlier years shown o 0 0 0 0 0 0 oN o^' oN oN on the table above. It is also apparent in �� �� �� �� �� �� �1 �ry �� �� �� recent years as well. ........................................................................................................ General Interest& Operations Sinking Fund Library Total FY 2012 0.003451 0.001124 0.000783 0.005358 FY 2013 0.003574 0.001097 0.000846 0.005517 FY 2014 0.003465 0.001064 0.00082 0.005349 FY 2015 0.003787 0.001066 0.000783 0.005636 FY 2016 0.003619 0.000989 0.000747 0.005355 FY 2017 0.003617 0.000941 0.000705 0.005263 FY 2018 0.003482 0.000772 0.00083 0.005084 FY 2019 0.003285 0.000692 0.000791 0.004768 FY 2020 0.003205 0.000648 0.000741 0.004594 FY 2021 0.002942 0.000713 0.000683 0.004338 FY 2022 0.002868 0.000556 0.000652 0.004076 FY 2023 0.002698 0.00046 0.000618 0.003776 28 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief Fiscal Year %Increase FY 2014 Actual 55,380,938 2.98% O FY 2015 Actual 57,873,243 4.50% FY 2016 Actual 59,927,247 3.55% Sales Tax Revenues in Salt Lake City FY 2017 Actual 62,776,248 4.75% The table to the right demonstrates a FY 2018 Actual 67,940,454 8.23% steady increase in sales tax revenues FY 2019 Actual 99,403,846 46.31 in Salt Lake City over the past several years. A sharp increase came with FY 2020 Actual 116,199,002 16.90% the implementation of the additional one-half-percent sales FY 2021 Actual 122,654,953 5.56% tax increase that is used for funding our future.The anticipated FY 2022 Actual 160,262,167 30.66% drop in revenue from FY2020 to FY2021 was the result of the FY 2023 Budget 149,414,508 (6.77)% economic downturn brought on by the COVID 19 pandemic. In FY2022, FY 2024 Budget 166,213,479 11.24% the City anticipates sales and use tax revenues to increase well beyond the Average 10.56% FY2021 amount as the economy Increase recovers. Further healthy sales tax growth is expected in FY2024 ...................................................................................................... 29 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief RELATED ORDINANCE CHANGES AND OTHER BUDGETARY ACTIONS 2023-24 REVENUE RELATED ORDINANCES ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to Consolidated Fee modify various fees included therein in accordance with the changes Schedule Adoption and presented in the budget. The changes include adjustments to the CPI,- Changes Water, Sewer and Storm Water rates,Amending delivery of Business Licensing Documents;and change in Refuse rates. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... An ordinance adopting the City budget, excluding the budget for the Budget Adoption Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Budget Adoption of An ordinance adopting the budget and staffing document for the the Salt Lake City Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Library ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Tax Rate of Salt Lake City An ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the and the City Library, Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City including the Judgement made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Levy ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Adopting the Mayor's Recommended Budget as An ordinance adopting the Tentative Budgets of Salt Lake City, including the Tentative Budget of the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund,for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Salt Lake City ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... BUDGET RESOLUTIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Budget Adoption of the A resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of Local Building Authority the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. (LBA) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Adopting the Mayor's Recommended Budget A resolution adopting the Tentative Budgets for the Capital Projects as the Tentative Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City,for Fiscal Year Budget of the Local 2023-24. Building Authority ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Budget Adoption of A resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of the Redevelopment Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. Agency(RDA) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Adopting the Mayor's Recommended Budget as A resolution adopting the Tentative Budgets of the Redevelopment Agency the Tentative Budget of of Salt Lake City,for Fiscal Year 2023-24. the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... HUMAN RESOURCES ISSUES ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Compensation Plan Ordinances adopting the compensation plan as ordinance for all Ordinances appointed and non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Ordinance(s) approving the Memorandum of Understanding(s) and Memorandum of wage agreements between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Understanding(MOU) Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Local 1004; the Adoption Ordinance(s) International Police Association's Local 75; and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81. 31 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank _��.� Lam.. t`�,� '� °� !� '� , 'j� •• '! •• \ 1M, �. +fit '�� - �� .~` k �^ •,.�- 01 :71K com MOP � � r r to- F " K • < t�,r� _ •fir; ��r' "✓ ,,! < /• "' �� - � y .•M r This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget Budget Summary As the City began planning for fiscal year 2024, a three-year plan was developed to move the City forward.As part of this three-year plan,the City considered the influx of one-time funding and the immediate help those funds provided against the ongoing needs the use of those funds created. The budget would need to plan not only for ongoing costs to provide services, but for future costs to maintain the resources and staff paid for with the one-time revenues. Transitioning ongoing costs paid for with one-time revenues to ongoing revenue streams is the goal of the three-year plan. The challenge facing the City was not about immediate funding options but about creating ongoing revenue streams to meet the future needs of the City. Salt Lake City has been experiencing strong growth in spite of the challenges of the past few years.The City needs to continue to build and invest so future growth will continue. One positive ongoing revenue stream for the City has been sales tax. Sales tax revenues over the past three years have performed much better than budget. Those revenues have allowed the City to add to its fund balance and puts the City in a sound position for the current year. The question that faced the mayor, her administrative team and the City budget committee was how to spend prudently and continue establishing programs for the future of Salt Lake City. The Mayor and her team looked at current revenues streams, one-time sources, including the use of the City's healthy fund balance and potential new revenue streams. The three-year outlook helped to provide a long-term strategy to carry the City forward. The budget put forth today provides the City with a balance between each of these options that will move the City forward to meet the challenges that lie ahead. The budget committee implemented a decision matrix to assist all departments in comparing their proposals or insights. As the departments reviewed their insights, they were asked to rate them based on different methods. One method was the matrix the budget committee developed and the other was the MSCW Method (Must, Should, Could,Want). The matrix looked at each City service to determine why the City was performing it and whether there were options to have the program provided through different means. It measured who benefits from the program, with special consideration for those who have typically been left behind in the past. It also looked at the process and outcome of adapting to difficult or challenging incidents based on eight criteria. Finally,the committee considered whether the insight meets ESG Goals(Environmental, Social and Governance) and if it meets other goals as outlined by the Mayor for 2023, as well as the goals of the 35 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget Council.The matrix allowed the budget committee and the departments to have a broader view of each proposal and how programs measured against each other. Because of this matrix, the initiatives brought forth in this budget have been carefully weighed against the Mayor's priorities of • Our Growth: Harnessing our growth for the good of all residents: • Our Environment: Leading the way on environmental resilience and stewardship; • Our Communities: Creating inclusive, safe, and equitable opportunities for all: and • Our City Family: Supporting employees' physical, mental, and economic well-being. The Mayor's recommended budget provides a roadmap for Salt Lake City to continue to grow and prosper. It has elements to take advantage of the economic success of today and outlines a course to ensure the financial health of the City going forward. This includes efforts to meet future needs for service through the careful addition of needed personnel and the use of one-time funds to build necessary resources to allow the City to continue to attract business and tourism and provide services for its citizens. REVENUES Salt Lake City revenue across all funds for fiscal year 2024 are $1,684,272,647.This represents an increase of 19.93% over fiscal year 2023 budgeted revenues.The increase is the result of several sources. Sales tax revenue continues to be a strong contributor and the Airport has stabilized from the decline during the COVID pandemic. However, in an effort to maintain the growth the City has seen recently and to meet regulatory requirements and other needs, the City will institute a rate increase at Public Utilities and Refuse. The largest contributors to City revenues are the Airport, Public Utilities and General Fund.Airport revenues are budgeted at$403.5 million while Public Utilities total revenue across all funds is $491.1 million.The General Fund fiscal year 2024 budget is $444.5 million, including use of fund balance. The City uses conservative revenue projections and maintains adequate reserves in each fund to ensure long-term financial stability. For the general fund, Salt Lake City creates its annual budget based on historical trend average of on-going revenues. From these averages the City then projects future growth, one-time revenues and potential new revenues to establish a final revenue projection.This projection becomes the basis of the budget for the Mayor and administration to create a balanced budget. 36 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND REVENUE For fiscal year 2024,total general fund revenue increased by 4.45%.The increase is associated with a projected increases in property tax and sales tax, and the use of $30.5 million of fund balance. For fiscal year 2024, the City projected significant increases in sales tax, interest and interfund reimbursements. The City also budgeted $2.4 million in additional revenue as a result of policy and ordinance changes. The City has also budgeted to use fund balance reserves to help cover projected deficits.The budget uses $30.5 million of fund balance representing 6.87% of General Fund revenue.While fund balance reserves were used,the City will still maintain a projected 13%fund balance for fiscal year 2024. Sales Tax is budgeted to increase by$16.8 million. Other notable increases in revenue are in Interfund Reimbursement,which is up $1.8 million and Interest Income, budgeted to increase by$5.9 million. Noteworthy decreases in revenue are Permits that are down $4.0 million due to higher interest rates.Transfers are budgeted $1 million above fiscal year 2023 budget. EXPENSES Total expense for Salt Lake City is budgeted at$1,828,754,107 across all funds.This represents a increase of$235.3 million from last fiscal year, or a 14.77% increase. Total Airport budget is set at$520.4 million, while Public Utilities is budgeted at $508.7 million and the General Fund at$444.5 million. The budget includes the addition of 115 full-time positions(FTEs) across all funds. The largest increase is in the General Fund where staffing will increase by 65.5 FTEs,with 5 positions previously added through budget amendments.The Airport (20), Public Utilities(16)and IMS (8)also saw significant staffing increases. GENERAL FUND EXPENSE General Fund expense increased by$18.9 million an increase of 4.45%from fiscal year 2023. Major changes to expense include salary, pension and benefit changes totaling$12.9 million.The budget also includes the addition of 65.5 FTEs at an anticipated cost of approximately$6.2 million, 5 of those positions were added through budget amendment. The positions include the creation of a new Parks Maintenance crew (19.5 FTEs)to create a better experience within City parks and along trails.4 FTE's to form a Civilian Response Team within the Police Department.This team will work with City police officers to mitigate issues throughout the City without the threat of force. The addition of 4 additions to the Community Health Access Team and one new 37 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget captain for the Medical Response Teams in the City to assist with medical calls throughout the City. The budget also provides additional staff to support youth programs through Youth City. Staffing is increased in Human Resources, Finance and IMS to meet the expanded needs in those departments as the City continues to grow. other notable increases in the General Fund are funding to continue the expanded Downtown Street Ambassador Program. Continuation of construction mitigation funding to assist businesses affected by City works projects. Funding to ensure City IT resources are protected from external threats, enhancements to city emergency response dispatch systems and funding to meet the general cost increases experienced across all City departments. SALARY, BENEFIT AND COMPENSATION COSTS The largest portion of the general fund budget is personnel costs.The total cost for compensation included in the budget is $265.7 million. This represents a 9.74% increase over fiscal year 2023. Budgeted salary, pension and benefit increases totaled $11.5 million for general fund employees. HEALTH INSURANCE Salt Lake City continues to offer one medical plan this year: Summit STAR-a High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP).The medical plan is administered through Public Employees Health Plan (PEHP). The city has realized significant savings- largely because of implementing the high deductible health plan and front-loading half the annual deductible into a health savings plan or flex account for employees. The implementation of a single provider network in 2011 has also been a significant source of savings for employees and the City. Utah Retirement Systems(URS) requires the city's medical plan reserve be maintained at a level to cover claims for a minimum of 55 days and a maximum of 100 days of premiums. The medical plan reserve balance has increased and has continued to maintain a positive balance since 2011. This year the budget includes a small premium increase of 2.9%to the Summit STAR plan.The increase is needed to keep up with trend (newly developed, expensive drugs, increased cost of services and new technology).Also included in the budget this year, as in prior years, is a proposal to front-load employee's Health Savings Accounts(HSA).The City HSA contribution will fund one-half of the deductible for the plan - $750 for singles and $1500 for doubles and families.The contribution will be placed into a health savings account or health reimbursement 38 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget account.As before,the city will continue to pay 95% of the total Summit Star medical premium. The budget also includes the addition of a new Lifestyle Spending Account (LSA). The LSA are post-tax accounts. Because they are post-tax accounts,the IRS does not mandate eligible expenses; rather, employers have the power to determine what types of expenses they would like to cover and how employees can spend their funds. Some examples of events that the LSA could be used for include: health and fitness services, childcare, life coaching, out of state medical travel expense, entertainment-the options are endless. COMPENSATION The budget includes a compensation package for employees which totals approximately$265.7 million for the General Fund and $423.8 million for the entire City. Increases to the City's compensation package are comprised of the following: REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES The budget includes honoring merit increases scheduled for award throughout fiscal year 2024 to all represented employees(AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees). The projected cost for these step increases(awarded on employee anniversary/ compensation dates) is approximately$636,424 for General Fund $1.06 million for the entire City. Although wage negotiations with AFSCME are on-going at the time the fiscal year 2024 budget is submitted to the City Council,the Administration has included an amount necessary to fund a S%general increase to the base wages for AFSCME- represented employees. Similarly,the Administration recommends funding for a 5%general base pay increase,for all other employees, including Police and Fire unions.The distribution of actual employee pay increases is subject to negotiations resulting in either tentative or previously ratified agreements, according to the City's Collective Bargaining Resolution. The projected cost for these pay increases is approximately$6.1 million for General Fund and $8.9 million across the City. NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES Non-represented employees, including those in 000, 300, 600, 800 and 900 (but not 901) series bargaining units will receive a 5%general increase to their base salary. The projected cost for all pay increases for non-represented employees is approximately$4.5 million to the general fund and $8.1 million citywide. 39 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MARKET ADJUSTMENTS As recommended by the Citizens'Compensation Advisory Committee for non- represented employees, the budget includes market adjustments for certain benchmarked employee groups in the City who lag either slightly or significantly behind market pay rates by more than 2%. The projected costs for market adjustments are approximately$391,465 and a city total of approximately $1.05 million. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) The Capital Improvement Fund is used for payment of sales tax and class B/C bond debt service and other infrastructure improvements including streets, sidewalks, city buildings, curb,gutter, street lighting, parks, open space, trails and bicycle facilities. More information on the specific projects funded this year will be available in the Capital Improvement Book. The summary of proposed projects is included later in the budget book. The budget includes a General Fund contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund of$23.2 million including funding from the Funding Our Future sales tax.The contribution for new projects is at$10.4 million for fiscal year 2024. This amount will be added to bond funding and other funding to continue to enhance the capital assets. The total fiscal year 2024 CIP exceeds $545 million with the inclusion of various projects funded by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City,the Department of Airports, Public Utilities, Sustainability, Golf,federal and state partnerships, Class "C" Funds, Impact Fees and the General Fund. Most of this funding is from Airport CIP projects($175.9 million), Public Utility improvements ($322.5 million)and $7 million in golf improvements to improve the golf experience on City owned courses and continue the positive trends golf has seen over the past two years. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM To maintain our commitment to transparency, we have once again separated the Funding Our Future budget of$52.3 million dollars to show use in the priority areas of housing, transit, streets, and public safety along with the expanded area of parks maintenance.This expanded area will allow the City to have needed funding to maintain City parks enhanced through Funding Our Future. Funding supports a total of 164 FTE's as well as setting aside funding for CIP. Housing-The budget allocates $7 million toward affordable housing through land discounts and financing, incentivized rent assistance and service to the most vulnerable. 40 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget Transit-$7 million is budgeted for the frequent transit network(FTN), with an additional $3 million in funding for an on-demand ride service to help residents reach transit networks. Streets-The budget includes continuing funding for the new streets team funded last year and additional equipment to expand the reach of that team.Additionally, the budget includes $3.4 million for new infrastructure CIP projects. Public Safety-The budget allocates funding for police officers, a Fire Department Medical Response Team as well as mental health workers in both the Police and Fire Departments.This year the expansion of the Civilian Response Team and the Community Health Access Team are proposed to be funded through Funding Our Future dollars. CONCLUSION The fiscal year 2023-2024 budget was prepared with the intent to maintain Salt Lake City's prosperity received over the past couple of years.The budget sets forth a plan to help the City meet ongoing costs with ongoing revenues.The budget will build on the solid base the City has experienced.The budget will help lead Salt Lake City into a continued prosperous future.The budget supports the core values and services of the City and will allow City residents to continue to enjoy a safe, healthy, and vibrant Salt Lake City. 41 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources GENERAL FUND(FC 10): Property Taxes 100,235,386 108,930,734 112,168,049 RDA Related Property Tax 17,496,737 16,082,193 15,985,753 Sale and Use Taxes 160,262,167 149,414,508 166,213,479 Franchise Taxes 11,750,309 11,657,128 12,348,127 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,587,083 1,638,222 1,905,573 TOTAL TAXES 291,331,682 287,722,785 308,620,981 Intergovernmental Revenue 5,960,591 4,644,622 5,134,621 Charges for Services 5,840,601 4,432,794 4,881,922 Other Revenue 79,167,617 81,468,620 69,184,044 Interfund Transfers In 21,717,361 24,431,717 26,131,213 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 112,686,170 114,977,753 105,331,800 SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES 404,017,852 402,700,538 413,952,781 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 22,836,869 30,552,143 TOTAL GENERAL FUND SOURCES 404,017,852 425,537,407 444,504,923 CAPITAL • Intergovernmental Revenue 9,911,418 3,870,505 — Sale of Land 35,077 — 200,000 Other Revenue 2,568,259 8,222,554 29,325,630 Bond Proceeds 23,400,000 — Interfund Transfers In 27,448,099 20,007,135 — Interfund Transfers In-Impact fees — — — Impact fees 18,005,181 3,360,193 — TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND REVENUES 81,368,034 35,460,387 29,525,630 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 81,368,034 35,460,387 29,525,630 42 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources ENTERPRISE AIRPORT(FC 54, 55&56) Intergovernmental Revenue 134,445,826 4,799,500 45,870,000 Charges for Services 250,288,392 288,322,100 330,988,600 Other Revenue 1,166,248,007 9,147,000 26,654,400 TOTAL AIRPORT FUND REVENUES 1,550,982,225 302,268,601 403,513,000 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 82,413,071 116,925,997 TOTAL AIRPORT FUND SOURCES 1,550,982,225 384,681,671 520,438,997 GOLF(FC 59) Charges for Services 10,351,196 9,496,327 10,550,653 Other Revenue 41,154 11,675 72,585 Interfund Transfers In 1,902,729 2,052,674 2,086,829 TOTAL GOLF FUND REVENUES 12,295,079 11,560,676 12,710,067 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 3,165,340 5,228,917 TOTAL GOLF FUND SOURCES 12,295,079 14,726,016 17,938,984 RDA(FC 92) Charges for Services 1,088,798 1,459,035 1,403,600 Other Revenue 34,504,131 43,738,998 47,321,567 Interfund Transfers In 33,388,320 18,102,866 21,311,829 TOTAL RDA FUND REVENUES 68,981,248 63,300,899 70,036,996 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — 5,040,831 TOTAL RDA FUND SOURCES 68,981,248 63,300,899 75,077,827 REFUSE COLLECTION (FC 57) Charges for Services 13,444,758 14,952,577 16,259,733 Other Revenue 3,830,642 6,505,526 9,210,515 TOTAL REFUSE COLLECTION FUND REVENUES 17,275,400 21,458,103 25,470,248 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 832,476 3,503,576 3,023,545 TOTAL REFUSE COLLECTION FUND SOURCES 18,107,876 24,961,679 28,493,793 43 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources SEWER UTILITY(FC 52) Charges for Services 57,803,567 66,833,500 76,387,000 Other Revenue 4,417,246 129,797,407 213,554,178 TOTAL SEWER UTILITY FUND REVENUES 62,220,813 196,630,907 289,941,178 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 50,794,553 59,283,673 11,891,444 TOTAL SEWER UTILITY FUND SOURCES 113,015,366 255,914,580 301,832,622 STORM WATER UTILITY(FC 53) Charges for Services 11,944,768 12,331,733 13,563,906 Other Revenue 2,326,230 1,145,000 6,301,986 TOTAL STORM WATER UTILITY FUND REVENUES 14,270,998 13,476,733 19,865,892 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 5,222,989 3,081,582 TOTAL STORM WATER UTILITY FUND SOURCES 14,270,998 18,699,722 22,947,474 WATER UTILITY(FC 51) Charges for Services 73,094,357 99,642,660 94,343,390 Other Revenue 8,321,195 8,553,708 82,293,898 TOTAL WATER UTILITY FUND REVENUES 81,415,552 108,196,368 176,637,288 Fund BalancelCash Reserves Used 32,278,796 24,556,447 1,316,499 TOTAL WATER UTILITY FUND SOURCES 113,694,348 132,752,815 177,953,787 STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT(FC 48) Charges for Services 4,264,579 4,174,622 4,592,085 Other Revenue 317,033 127,600 89,100 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 4,581,612 4,302,222 4,681,185 REVENUES Fund BalancelCash Reserves Used — 1,455,603 1,362,964 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND 4,581,612 5,757,825 6,044,149 SOURCES 44 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget • R'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources HOUSING LOANS &TRUST(FC 78) Intergovernmental Revenue — — — Charges for Services 2,035 4,000 4,000 Other Revenue 10,578,925 16,213,000 5,398,000 Interfund Transfers In 1,116,926 — — TOTAL HOUSING LOANS&TRUST FUND 11,697,886 16,217,000 5,402,000 REVENUES Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 19,646,011 9,562,254 — TOTAL HOUSING LOANS&TRUST FUND SOURCES 31,343,897 25,779,254 5,402,000 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: FLEET MANAGEMENT(FC 61) Interfund Reimbursement 13,997,313 15,801,669 18,037,796 Other Revenue 3,268,720 2,297,868 2,300,368 Interfund Transfers In 10,747,130 10,727,455 11,770,805 TOTAL FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND REVENUES 28,013,163 28,826,992 32,108,969 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 1,599,039 389,782 TOTAL FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND SOURCES 28,013,163 30,426,031 32,498,751 GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY(FC 85) Other Revenue 1,525,749 3,964,523 3,775,947 Interfund Transfers In 2,792,806 — — TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND 4,318,555 3,964,523 3,775,947 REVENUES Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND 4,318,555 3,964,523 3,775,947 SOURCES INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES(FC 65) Charges for Services 19,479,583 30,332,167 36,109,125 Other Revenue 70,704 — — Interfund Transfers In 378,220 — — TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT. FUND REVENUES 19,928,507 30,332,167 36,109,125 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 211,908 200,000 2,447,816 TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT. FUND SOURCES 20,140,415 30,532,167 38,556,941 45 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources INSURANCE & RISK MANAGEMENT(FC 87) Charges for Services 49,635,496 53,229,000 59,027,192 Other Revenue 418,056 1,450,000 1,450,000 TOTAL INSURANCE AND RISK MGMT. FUND 50,053,551 54,679,000 60,477,192 REVENUES Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — 1,728,519 TOTAL INSURANCE AND RISK MGMT. FUND 50,053,551 54,679,000 62,205,711 SOURCES SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS: CURB/GUTTER(FC 20) Special Assessment Taxes 12,042 — — Other Revenue 5,951 3,000 3,000 TOTAL CURB/GUTTER S.A. FUND REVENUES 17,993 3,000 3,000 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL CURB/GUTTER S.A. FUND SOURCES 17,993 3,000 3,000 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: CDBG OPERATING (FC 71) Intergovernmental Revenue 5,040,965 4,670,517 5,597,763 Interfund Transfers In 1,250,000 TOTAL CDBG FUND REVENUES 6,290,965 4,670,517 5,597,763 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 179,555 287,916 — TOTAL CDBG FUND SOURCES 6,470,520 4,958,433 5,597,763 EMERGENCY 911 DISPATCH (FC 60) E911 Telephone Surcharges 4,774,044 3,850,000 3,850,000 Other Revenue 21,800 75,000 75,000 TOTAL E911 FUND REVENUES 4,795,844 3,925,000 3,925,000 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL E911 FUND SOURCES 4,795,844 3,925,000 3,925,000 46 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • BUDGET ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources MISC. GRANTS OPERATING (FC 72) Intergovernmental Revenue 43,596,767 34,158,918 7,390,097 Other Revenue 431,803 — — Interfund Transfers In 32,495 — — TOTAL MISC.GRANTS OPERATING FUND 44,061,065 34,158,918 7,390,097 REVENUES Fund BalancelCash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL MISC.GRANTS OPERATING FUND SOURCES 44,061,065 34,158,918 7,390,097 MISC. SPEC. SERV. DISTRICTS(FC 46) Special Assessment Taxes 2,108,541 1,700,000 1,700,000 Other Revenue 6,326 — — Interfund Transfers In — — — TOTAL MISC.SPEC.SERV.DISTRICTS FUND 2,114,867 1,700,000 1,700,000 REVENUES Fund BalancelCash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL MISC.SPEC.SERV. DISTRICTS FUND 2,114,867 1,700,000 1,700,000 SOURCES OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (FC 73) Special Assessment Taxes — — — Charges for Services 134,609 — — Other Revenue 111,415 — 300,000 Interfund Transfers In — 300,000 100,000 TOTAL OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND REVENUES 246,024 300,000 400,000 Fund BalancelCash Reserves Used 60,956 — — TOTAL OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND SOURCES 306,980 300,000 400,000 SALT LAKE CITY DONATION FUND (FC 77) Contributions 94,120 563,500 500,000 Other Revenue 2,389,931 2,356,750 — Interfund Transfers In — — — TOTAL DONATION FUND REVENUES 2,484,051 2,920,250 500,000 Fund BalancelCash Reserves Used — — — TOTAL DONATION FUND SOURCES 2,484,051 2,920,250 500,000 47 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Revenue and Other Sources QUARTER CENT SALES TAX FOR TRANSPORTATION (FC 69) Transfer from Salt Lake County — — — Other Revenue 9,070,288 9,600,000 9,700,000 TOTAL QUARTER CENT REVENUES 9,070,288 9,600,000 9,700,000 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — TOTAL QUARTER CENT SOURCES 9,070,288 9,600,000 9,700,000 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: DEBT SERVICE (FC 81) Property Taxes 17,315,863 17,368,652 17,342,055 Intergovernmental Revenue 5,314,976 2,187,367 2,179,461 Bond proceeds 32,595,914 — — Other Revenue 24,661 318,608 1,746,842 Interfund Transfers In 10,329,239 12,163,362 11,073,228 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND REVENUES 65,580,654 32,037,989 32,341,586 Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 1,620,569 2,553,393 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND SOURCES 65,580,654 33,658,558 34,894,979 TOTAL REVENUE BUDGET 2,546,082,228 1,382,690,789 1,645,764,944 TOTAL USE OF FUND BALANCE 104,004,253 215,707,346 185,543,432 GRAND TOTAL OF SOURCES 2,650,086,481 1,598,398,135 1,831,308,376 Expenses and Other Uses GENERAL FUND RESERVES CITY COUNCIL OFFICE General Fund 4,159,816 5,387,707 5,960,249 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,159,816 5,387,707 5,960,249 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR General Fund 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Airport Fund 734,175,579 384,681,671 520,438,997 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 816,806,646 — — DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS TOTAL 1,550,982,225 384,681,671 520,438,997 EXPENDITURES 48 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Expenses and Other Uses SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY General Fund 7,625,254 9,007,633 10,150,844 Governmental Immunity Internal Svc. Fund 1,919,286 3,169,767 3,370,012 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 2,399,269 794,756 405,935 Insurance&Risk Mgmt. Internal Svc. Fund 3,766,524 4,627,849 4,856,345 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 328,559 — — SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL EXPENDITURES 13,311,064 16,805,248 18,377,201 DEPT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS General Fund 21,410,406 29,311,147 32,039,953 Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation 5,306,170 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 3,764,118 — — DEPT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS 26,716,576 29,311,147 32,039,953 TOTAL EXPENDITURES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT General Fund 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 TOTAL EXPENDITURES DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE General Fund 8,513,325 10,709,847 12,168,296 IMS-IFAS 3,075,269 5,156,937 5,929,187 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — Risk 35,562 35,562 35,562 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,624,156 15,902,346 18,133,045 FIRE DEPARTMENT General Fund 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 HUMAN RESOURCES General Fund 3,153,725 4,236,836 4,659,300 Insurance&Risk Mgmt. Internal Svc. Fund 45,922,907 50,015,589 57,313,804 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 328,559 — — HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL EXPENDITURES 49,076,632 54,252,425 61,973,104 49 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Expenses and Other Uses INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Information Management Service Fund 17,065,145 25,375,230 32,627,754 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — INFO. MGMT.SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICES FUND 17,065,145 25,375,230 32,627,754 TOTAL EXPENDITURES JUSTICE COURT General Fund 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 JUSTICE COURT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 POLICE DEPARTMENT General Fund 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 PUBLIC LANDS General Fund 19,028,484 24,229,676 27,162,271 Golf Enterprise Fund 9,121,872 14,726,016 17,938,984 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 3,173,208 — — PUBLIC LANDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,150,356 38,955,692 45,101,255 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Fund 32,883,047 39,398,484 43,105,409 Fleet Management Internal Service Fund 19,175,658 30,426,031 32,498,750 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 8,837,504 — — PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT TOTAL 52,058,705 69,824,515 75,604,159 EXPENDITURES 911 COMMUNICATION BUREAU General Fund 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU TOTAL 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 EXPENDITURES PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund 113,015,365 255,914,580 301,832,622 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — Storm Water Utility Enterprise Fund 10,710,425 18,699,722 22,947,474 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 3,560,573 — — Water Utility Enterprise Fund 113,694,347 132,752,815 177,953,787 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — 50 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Expenses and Other Uses Street Lighting Enterprise Funds 4,239,497 5,757,825 6,044,149 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 34Z 115 — — PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT TOTAL 241,659,635 413,124,942 508,778,032 EXPENDITURES SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT Refuse Fund 18,107,234 24,952,671 28,493,792 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT TOTAL 18,107,234 24,952,671 28,493,792 EXPENDITURES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Redevelopment Agency Fund 64,615,937 63,300,899 75,077,827 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURES 64,615,937 63,300,899 75,077,827 NON DEPARTMENTAL General Fund 107,897,308 124,299,673 118,412,798 Curb/Gutter Special Assessment Fund 911 3,000 3,000 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 17,082 — — CDBG Operating Special Revenue Fund 6,470,520 4,958,433 5,597,763 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — Emergency 911 Dispatch Special Rev. Fund 3,691,166 3,800,385 3,800,385 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 1,104,678 124,615 124,615 Housing Loans&Trust Special Rev. Fund 31,343,897 25,779,254 955,000 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — 4,447,000 Misc. Grants Operating Special Rev. Fund 41,916,856 26,614,153 7,390,097 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 2,144,209 7,544,765 — Misc.Spec. Svc. Districts Special Rev. Fund 1,557,197 1,700,000 1,700,000 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 557,671 — — Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation 9,458,748 9,700,000 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 141,252 — Other Special Revenue Funds 306,980 300,000 400,000 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — — Salt Lake City Donation Fund 2,252,760 2,870,250 500,000 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 231,291 50,000 — 51 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MAYOR'S • ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2023-24 MAYORS ADOPTED RECOMMENDED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Expenses and Other Uses Debt Service Funds 60,679,751 33,658,558 34,894,979 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 4,900,903 — — Capital Projects Fund 49,267,660 35,460,387 29,034,160 Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 32,100,374 — 491,470 NON DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL EXPENDITURES 305,385,006 268,902,841 212,388,182 GEN FUND BAL/CASH RESERVES TOTAL EXPENSE BUDGET 1,713,819,531 1,589,733,740 1,825,839,356 TOTAL INC TO FUND BALANCE 932,229,554 8,514,136 5,469,020 GRAND TOTAL OF USES 2,646,049,085 1,598,247,876 1,831,308,376 NET CHANGE TO FUND BALANCE 828,225,301 (207,193,210) (180,074,412) Governmental Fund Type: TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 333,356,572 425,537,408 444,504,924 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 4,159,816 5,387,707 5,960,249 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY 7,625,254 9,007,633 10,150,844 COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS 21,410,406 29,311,147 32,039,953 DEPT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 8,513,325 10,709,847 12,168,296 FIRE DEPARTMENT 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 HUMAN RESOURCES 3,153,725 4,236,836 4,659,300 JUSTICE COURTS 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 POLICE DEPARTMENT 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 PUBLIC LANDS — — 27,162,271 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 32,883,047 39,398,484 43,105,409 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 NON DEPARTMENTAL 107,897,308 124,299,673 118,412,798 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 61,501,649 40,243,221 29,088,245 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 60,680,662 33,661,558 34,897,979 TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 49,267,660 35,460,387 29,034,160 Proprietary Fund Type: TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 90,960,351 118,806,965 136,631,414 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 1,099,024,153 926,565,453 1,151,682,632 TOTAL EXPENSE BUDGET 1,694,791,047 1,580,274,992 1,825,839,357 52 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND REVENUE KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General Fund Funding Our TOTAL Future Revenue Changes Prior Year Adopted Budget 378,322,311 47,215,097 425,537,408 Transfer ARPA Funding(moved to Fund Balance) — — — Transfer ARPA Available Salary Restoration 792,195 — 792,195 Taxes Property Tax — Anticipated Increase(New Growth) 2,140,028 — 2,140,028 RDA Tax Increment 453,333 — 453,333 Increment from Inland port area 547,514 — 547,514 Sales Tax General Fund 12,078,982 4,719,989 16,798,971 Franchise Taxes 690,999 — 690,999 PILOT 267,351 — 267,351 Licenses and Permits Licenses 1,901,478 — 1,901,478 Permits (4,041,715) — (4,041,715) Intergovernmental Revenue 489,999 — 489,999 Charges, Fees and Rentals 449,128 — 449,128 Fines 298,374 — 298,374 Parking Meter Collections (41,386) — (41,386) Interest Income 5,928,846 — 5,928,846 Miscellaneous Revenue 63,649 — 63,649 Interfund Reimbursement (158,402) — (158,402) Administrative Fees 1,857,898 — 1,857,898 Other — — — Transfers 448,875 — 448,875 Health Insurance Premium 1,076,284 — 1,076,284 New Revenue Options Increase fees on Consolidated Fee Schedule(CFS) Increase Bus Lic Fee for Residential Rental Units 738,315 — 738,315 Increase Bus Lic Fee for Hotel/Motel Units 49,912 — 49,912 Increase Meter Bagging Fee ($28 to $50) 207,000 — 207,000 Increase Lane Closure Fee and Penalty ($14 to $50) 1,494,000 — 1,494,000 Increase Boarded Building Fee — — — CPI (6.3%included in revenue above) — — — Change in One-Time Revenue FY2024 One-Time Revenues Use of Fund Balance 26,267,308 2,503,642 28,770,950 Premium Holiday(potential second period) 1,076,000 — 1,076,000 Recapture of REP Funding 1,781,192 — 1,781,192 Transfer from Fleet 359,454 359,454 53 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND REVENUE KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General Fund Funding Our TOTAL Future Revenue Changes Remove FY2023 One-Time Revenues One Time Use of General Fund Balance (14,601,363) — (14,601,363) Transfer ARPA Revenue Replacement (19,890,111) — (19,890,111) Transfer ARPA Salary Restoration Removal (1,545,746) — (1,545,746) FY2022 Civilian Response Team Recapture(Fund — Balance) (2,100,608) (2,100,608) FY2022 Bond Delay Payment Recapture(Fund Balance) (3,700,000) — (3,700,000) Racial Equity in Policing Recapture(Fund Balance) (2,284,899) — (2,284,899) Racial Equity in Policing Training for Police Recapture (150,000) — (150,000) (Fund Balance) Transfer from CIP Holding Account from FY2022 BA#7 (1,200,000) — (1,200,000) Proposed Revenue 392,166,803 52,338,120 444,504,923 GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Department City Council 5,387,707 36.00 Annualization of partially funded — — — — — — positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 45,669 — — — 45,669 — Base to Base (336,058) — — — (336,058) — Pension Changes (17,998) — — — (17,998) — Insurance Changes 8,940 — — — 8,940 — Merit Changes — — — — — — Salary Proposal 171,889 — — — 171,889 — CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — — — Council Office Adjustments 350,000 — — — 350,000 — TOTAL City Council 5,610,149 36.00 — — 5,610,149 36.00 Legislative Non Departmental 350,100 No New Proposals — — TOTAL Legislative Non Departmental 350,100 — — — 350,100 — Mayor's Office 6,625,451 32.00 Annualization of partially funded 36,606 — — — 36,606 — positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 62,538 — — — 62,538 — Base to Base (244,126) — — — (244,126) — Pension Changes (26,434) — (26,434) — Insurance Changes 10,156 — 10,156 — Merit Changes — — — — — — 54 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Salary Proposal 195,424 - - - 195,424 - CCAC Salary Adjustments 7,576 - - - 7,576 - Remove Art under the bypass[One Time] (60,000) - - - (60,000) - Stipends for Boards and Commissions 29,420 - - - 29,420 - Fleet Block Engagement (100,000) - - - (100,000) - BudgetAmendment#3: Transferring Consumer Protection Analyst from Mayor's -108841 (1.00) - - (108,841) (1.00) Office to Housing Stability Love Your Block Program(Grade 23)(10 160,667 2.00 - - 160,667 2.00 Mths) Know your Neighbor(Grade 23)(10 Mths) 92,000 1.00 - - 92,000 1.00 Office Reconfiguration 25,000 - - - 25,000 - Professional Association Membership 20,000 - - - 20,000 - Fees Travel 59,630 - - - 59,630 - Slc Corps Operating Expenses 15,000 - - - 15,000 - Operating Cost 20,000 - - - 20,000 - TOTAL Mayor's Office 6,820,067 34.00 - - 6,820,067 34.00 Attorney's Office 9,007,633 58.50 Annualization of partially funded 41,886 - - - 41,886 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 66,500 - - - 66,500 - Base to Base 158,421 - - - 158,421 - Pension Changes (35,608) - - - (35,608) - Insurance Changes 19,592 - - - 19,592 - Merit Changes - - - - - - Salary Proposal 339,500 - - - 339,500 - CCAC Salary Adjustments 32,849 - - - 32,849 - Contracted Services Adjustments 33,324 - - - 33,324 - Special Project Analysis&Automation 99,509 1.00 - - 99,509 1.00 (Grade 26)(10 Mths)-Salary Only Salary Adjustment for Prosecutor 200,000 200,000 Prosecutor's-Assistant Prosecutor 132,238 1.00 - - 132,238 1.00 (Grade 34)(10 Mths)(Miami Model) Office Reconfiguration 55,000 - - - 55,000 - TOTAL Attorney's Office 10,150,844 60.50 - - 10,150,844 60.50 Community and Neighborhoods 25,939,694 182.00 3,371,453 8.00 Annualization of partially funded 81,853 - 40,749 - 122,602 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 60,236 - - - 60,236 - Base to Base (45,751) - (64,759) - (110,510) - Pension Changes (101,942) - (5,400) - (107,342) - Insurance Changes 59,712 - 2,620 - 62,332 - 55 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Merit Changes 41,242 - - - 41,242 - Salary Proposal 885,895 - 42,026 - 927,921 - CCACSalaryAdjustments 48,774 - - - 48,774 - Remove Personnel Program Expenses(One- (22,600) - - - (22,600) - Time] Remove Temporary Traffic Calming[One- (100,000) - - - (100,000) - Time] CCC&Green Team 6 Month Reduction - - - - - - Fix the Bricks Match(100916 AMI or Below Household Income) - - - - - - BudgetAmendment#3: Transferring Consumer Protection Analyst from Mayor's 108,841 1.00 - - 108,841 1.00 Office to Housing Stability Budget Amendment#4:Lease&Tenant 130,000 - - - 130,000 - Improvements for Substations Budget Amendment#4:Transferring CIP (223,299) (2.00) - - (223,299) (2.00) and Impact Fees Positions to Finance Duplicate Position Eliminated per HR (127,537) (1.00) - - (127,537) (1.00) YF Youth and Community Programs Four 447,136 4.00 - - 447,136 4.00 FTES(One-time) Civil Enforcement Positions(Grade 19) 194,000 2.00 - - 194,000 2.00 (10 Mths) Planning- 15 Minute City Program Expenses[One-Time] 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Business Systems Analyst II (Grade 28) 111,010 1.00 111,010 1.00 (10 Mths) Youth &Family Strategic Plan 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Homeless HSD-Advantage Services - - 598,000 - 598,000 - FOF CAN/HSD-TIP,Tenant Relocation - - 180,000 - 180,000 - Assistance Program FOF CAN/HSD-TIP,Tenant Resource 46,000 - 46,000 - 92,000 - Center and Navigation Service Homeless HSD-Ambassador Expansion 96,000 - - - 96,000 - Area Increase [One-Time] TOTAL Community and Neighborhoods 27,829,264 187.00 4,210,689 8.00 32,039,953 195.00 Economic Development 3,695,620 22.00 Annualization of partially funded - - - - - - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 36,134 - - - 36,134 - Base to Base 73,916 - - - 73,916 - Pension Changes (17,205) - - - (17,205) - Insurance Changes 6,244 - - - 6,244 - Merit Changes - - - - - - Salary Proposal 127,439 - - - 127,439 - CCAC Salary Adjustments 12,943 - - - 12,943 - Construction Mitigation Funding - - - - - - 56 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Health Care Innovation Youth Summit 20,000 - - - 20,000 - [Ongoing] DED Strategic Plan(One-time) 80,000 - - - 80,000 - TOTAL Economic Development 4,035,091 22.00 - - 4,035,091 22.00 Finance Department 10,709,847 76.70 Annualization of partially funded 86,135 86,735 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 120,078 - 120,078 - Base to Base 22,701 - - - 22,701 - Pension Changes (43,469) - - - (43,469) - Insurance Changes 31,584 - - - 31,584 - Merit Changes 12,282 - - - 12,282 - Salary Proposal 425,852 425,852 - CCAC Salary Adjustments 73,872 - - - 73,872 - Remove Purchasing Outreach[One-Time] (30,000) - - - (30,000) - BudgetAmendment#4:Contract 197,800 2.00 - - 197,800 2.00 Development Specialists Budget Amendment#4: Transferring CIP 223,299 2.00 - - 223,299 2.00 and Impact Fees Positions to Finance Personnel and Professional Development 169,842 - - - 169,842 - Ongoing Software and Inflation- 84,200 - - - 84,200 - Resource X&E-Civis[Ongoing] Financial Analyst II for Salt Lake 87,373 1.00 - - 87,373 1.00 Foundation(Grade 24)( 10 Mths) Program costs 2,000 - - - 2,000 - Radio Transfer to IMS (5,100) - - - (5,700) - TOTAL Finance Department 12,168,296 81.70 - - 12,168,296 81.70 Fire Department 47,716,952 383.00 869,540 9.00 Annualization of partially funded 172,865 - 24,022 - 196,887 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 10,518 - - - 10,518 - Base to Base (470,241) - 42,368 - (427,873) - Pension Changes (8,846) - (1,076) - (9,922) - Insurance Changes 150,824 - 3,348 - 154,172 - Merit Changes 372,447 - 6,571 - 379,018 - Salary Proposal 1,843,743 - 37,261 - 1,881,004 - CCAC Salary Adjustments 22,305 - - - 22,305 - Remove Turn-Out Gear[One-Time] (12,000) - - - (12,000) - Remove Program Expenses[One-Time] (1,200) - (47,200) - (48,400) - Fire Contract&Inflationary Increases 274,765 - - - 274,765 - (CHAT)Community Health Access Team - - 369,667 4.00 369,667 4.00 Enhancements Program Costs[One-Time, $2,000] 21,000 - 21,000 - 57 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Fire Captain- Medical Division(6-month - - 72,252 1.00 72,252 1.00 Funding) Program Costs[One-Time, $2,500] - - 3,200 - 3,200 - Dept. of Airports-ARFF/MRT FTEs(100% 764,666 5.00 - - 764,666 5.00 Revenue Budgeted) SCBA Compressor&Hydrostatic Testing 114,000 - - - 114,000 - (One-time Funding) Versaterm Transfer to IMS(For Software (48,159) - - - (48,159) - Systems&Tech) Radio Transfer to IMS (39,235) - - - (39,235) - TOTAL Fire 50,863,404 388.00 1,400,953 14.00 52,264,357 402.00 Human Resources Department 4,236,836 31.40 Annualization of partially funded 84,378 - - - 84,378 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 22,566 - - - 22,566 - Base to Base (125,559) - - - (125,559) - Pension Changes (19,985) - - - (19,985) - Insurance Changes 10,596 - - - 10,596 - Merit Changes - - - - - - Salary Proposal 172,248 - - - 172,248 - CCAC Salary Adjustments - - - - - - Project&Policy Manager(Grade 24)(10 121,588 1.00 - - 121,588 1.00 Mths) Business Partner I (Grade 25)(10 Mths) 128,460 1.00 - - 128,460 1.00 Operational Expense Increases 10,172 - - - 10,172 - Pre-Employment Screening(Transfer 18,000 - - - 18,000 from Public Services) TOTAL Human Resources 4,659,300 33.40 - - 4,659,300 33.40 Justice Court 5,199,660 42.00 Annualization of partially funded positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 5,330 - - - 5,330 - Base to Base 33,574 - - - 33,574 - Pension Changes (14,025) - - - (14,025) - Insurance Changes 14,520 - - - 14,520 - Merit Changes 4,788 - - - 4,788 - Salary Proposal 196,489 - - - 196,489 - CCAC Salary Adjustments 7,029 - - - 7,029 - Judicial Salary Increases 42,355 - - - 42,355 - TOTAL Justice Court 5,489,720 42.00 - - 5,489,720 42.00 58 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Police Department 91,769,074 665.00 12,207,968 85.00 Annualization of partially funded 79,546 - 546,193 - 625,739 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 28,874 - - - 28,874 - BasetoBase 502,096 - (421,911) - 80,185 - Pension Changes (39,432) - (11,921) - (51,353) - Insurance Changes 265,468 - 32,376 - 297,844 - Merit Changes 5,551 - 2,780 - 8,331 - Salary Proposal 3,804,240 - 377,963 - 4,182,203 - CCACSalaryAdjustments 74,188 - - - 74,188 - Remove New Program Start Up Expenses (12,000) - - - (12,000) - [One-Time] Remove Versaterm E-Ticketing[One-Time] (60,000) - - - (60,000) - Remove base pay covered by 2020 COPS (450,000) (450,000) Hiring grant funding Contractual Pay Items 700,000 - - - 700,000 - Police Overtime(Revenue Offset) 483,296 - - - 483,296 - Non-Personnel Inflationary Costs 302,991 - - - 302,991 - License Plate Reader(LPR)program 150,000 150,000 Sergeant Internal Affairs Program(9 143,186 1.00 - - 143,186 1.00 Mths) Sergeant IA Program- PD Costs 22,780 - - - 22,780 - Sergeant IA Program- Fleet&Fuel 3,300 - - - 3,300 - Costs[Ongoing] Increase Civilian Response-(9 Mths) - - - - - Civilian Response(Grade 20)(9 Mths) - - 202,999 4.00 202,999 4.00 Other Equipment[One-Time] - - 74,056 - 74,056 - Fleet&Fuel Costs(Ongoing) - - 6,400 - 6,400 - Increase Airport Operations Program-(9 760,881 6.00 - - 760,881 6.00 Mths) Other One-Time Expenses 106,680 - - - 106,680 - Other Ongoing Expenses 49,800 - - - 49,800 - Printer Lease Management Transfer to (55,000) - - - (55,000) - IMS Versaterm Transfer to IMS(For Software (526,380) - - - (526,380) - Systems&Tech) Radio Transfer to IMS(Radio System) (149,230) (149,230) - TOTAL Police Department 97,959,909 672.00 13,016,903 89.00 110,976,812 761.00 Public Lands 23,542,252 135.35 687,424 8.00 Annualization of partially funded 66,704 - - - 66,704 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 29,797 - - - 29,797 - Base to Base 134,357 - (69,774) - 64,583 - Pension Changes (67,051) - (4,900) - (71,951) - Insurance Changes 44,024 - 1,892 - 45,916 - 59 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Merit Changes 58,063 - 4,986 - 63,049 - Salary Proposal 545,936 - 26,893 - 572,829 - CCACSalaryAdjustments 11,078 - - - 11,078 - Remove Office Configuration[One-Time] (100,000) - - - (100,000) - Remove Tree Watering Campaign Education (50,000) - - - (50,000) - [One-Time] Budget Amendment#4:2 Public Lands 229,440 2.00 - - 229,440 2.00 Planner Positions Inflationary&Contractual Increases 649,500 - - - 649,500 - Expanded Citywide Events 219,500 1.00 219,500 1.00 FOF-Parks New Properties&Growth and Use Impacts(10 months) Parks Maintenance Tech II (Grade 16) - - 67,800 1.00 67,800 1.00 (10 Mths) Associated Seasonals - - 127,500 127,500 - Program Costs[Ongoing] - - 110,450 110,450 - Sr Natural Resource Technician - - 67,800 1.00 67,800 1.00 (Grade 16)(10 Mths) Maint. Electrician IV(Grade 22)(10 83,800 1.00 83,800 1.00 Mths) Program Costs[Ongoing] - - 39,000 39,000 - General Maint.Worker IV(Grade 21) - - 79,800 1.00 79,800 1.00 (10 Mths) Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III (Grade 20) - - 76,000 1.00 76,000 1.00 (10 Mths) Central Control Irrigation SPE(Grade 76,000 1.00 76,000 1.00 20)(10 Mths) Sr Warehouse Operator(Grade 15) 7,500 0.50 7,500 0.50 (10 Mths) FOF-T&NL New Properties&Growth and Use Impacts Sr Natural Resource Technician - - 62,000 1.00 62,000 1.00 (Grade 16)(10 Mths) Associated Seasonals - - (13,400) (13,400) - Program Costs[Ongoing] - - 38,000 38,000 - Environ Specialist II Union - - 74,700 1.00 74,700 1.00 Sr Natural Resource Technician - - 62,000 1.00 62,000 1.00 (Grade 16)(10 Mths) Associated Seasonals - - 17,200 17,200 Program Costs[Ongoing] - - 52,000 52,000 - Operational Expenses[One-Time] 50,000 50,000 - Sr Natural Resource Technician - - 62,000 1.00 62,000 1.00 (Grade 16)(10 Mths) Sr Natural Resource Technician - - 62,000 1.00 62,000 1.00 (Grade 16)(10 Mths) TOTAL Public Lands 25,313,600 138.35 1,848,671 19.50 27,162,271 157.85 6o Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 General FTE Funding FTE TOTAL FTE Fund Our Future Departmental Public Services 35,915,905 235.00 3,482,579 26.00 Annualization of partially funded 123,688 - 44,327 - 168,015 - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 92,027.00 - - - 92,027 - Base to Base 108,523.00 - (203,084.00) - (94,561) - Pension Changes (123,729.00) - (12,672.00) - (136,401) - Insurance Changes 85,724.00 - 7,856.00 - 93,580 - Merit Changes 29,792.00 - - - 29,792 - Salary Proposal 1,023,976.00 - 90,712.00 - 1,114,688 - CCACSalaryAdjustments 100,850.00 - - - 100,850 - Remove New Program Start Up Expenses (7,180.00) - - - (7,180) - [One-Time] Budget Amendment#4:Sr. Project Manager 160,800.00 1.00 - - 160,800 1.00 Streets Mill and Overlay Pilot Program - - - (Equipment funding in CIP) 130,000 - 130,000 Converting part-time Office Tech to FTE- - 1.00 - - - 1.00 Streets Contractual Increases/Inflationary 1,256,000 - - - 1,256,000 - Safety and Security Manager(Grade 37) 152,565 1.00 152,565 1.00 (10 mths) Environmental Engineer-(Grade 33)(10 160,000 1.00 160,000 1.00 Mths) Other One-Time Expenses 18,000 - - - 18,000 - Building Administrator(10 Mths) 129,000 1.00 - - 129,000 1.00 Other One-Time Expenses 2,750 2,750 - New FTEs(4):Trades Apprenticeship 332,000 4.00 - - 332,000 4.00 Program(10 Mths) Public EV Charging Stations Maintenance 45,000 - - - 45,000 - Engineering AutoCAD transfer to IMS (22,000) - - - (22,000) - Pre-Employment Screening transfer to (18,000) - - - (18,000) - HR TOTAL Public Services 39,565,691 244.00 3,539,718 26.00 43,105,409 270.00 911 Dispatch 10,079,756 92.00 792,384 8.00 100.00 Annualization of partially funded - - - - - - positions Annualization of NFP Adjustments 1,761 - - - 1,761 - Base to Base (108,747) - 21,631 - (87,116) - Pension Changes (47,840) - (3,780) - (51,620) - Insurance Changes 26,992 - 3,224 - 30,216 - Merit Changes 97,922 - - - 97,922 - Salary Proposal 363,066 - 33,387 - 396,453 - CCAC Salary Adjustments - - - - - - TOTAL 911 Dispatch 10,412,910 92.00 846,846 8.00 11,259,756 100.00 Departmental .tals 301,228,346 2030.95 :1 164.5 326,092,126 61 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget NON-DEPARTMENTALGENERAL FUND FY2024 General Change Funding Change TOTAL Fund Our Future Expense Changes Airport Trail Reimbursement 103,887 (103,887) - - - Apprenticeship Program (Transfer to Public Services and Wasatch 1,025,000 (395,000) - - 630,000 Gardens) Employee Appreciation - 150,000 - - 150,000 City Hall Security Improvements(Remove 933,000 (933,000) - - - One-Time) City Hall Police Presence 267,000 13,350 - - 280,350 Fire SCBAArt 197,400 - - - 197,400 Police Body Cameras and Vehicle 687,422 - 512,578 - 1,200,000 Integration Axon Body Camera Services Enhancement 349,692 349,692 City Resident Bus Pass(HIVE) 1,160,000 (810,000) - - 350,000 Free Bus Passes for School Children 100,000 - - - 100,000 Federal Grant Match Account 1,000,000 (1,000,000) - - - Contract for Animal Services 1,968,385 2,263 - - 1,970,648 Demographic Contract 50,000 - - - 50,000 Jordan River Commission(Membership) 14,000 2,000 - - 16,000 Municipal Elections 20,000 - - 20,000 Election Cost - 244,551 - - 244,551 Ranked Choice Voting Awareness - 40,000 - - 40,000 Oath of Office Event - 30,000 - - 30,000 Outgoing Elected Official Event - 20,000 - - 20,000 Retirement Payouts 696,000 - - - 696,000 Sorenson Center with County 1,014,800 - - - 1,014,800 Transportation Utility Fee Consultant[One- - 50,000 - - 50,000 Time] Tuition Aid program 320,000 - - - 320,000 Washington D.C. Lobbyist 75,000 - - - 75,000 Capital Improvement Fund: Debt Service Fund Debt Service on Bonds 9,346,796 193,730 - - 9,540,526 Debt Service on ESCO 896,500 (135,500) - - 761,000 Debt Service on LBA 1,174,025 (1,174,025) Ongoing Commitments Transfer to CIP for ongoing 600,000 - - - 600,000 commitments Facilities Capital Replacement 350,000 - - - 350,000 Parks Capital Replacement 250,000 250,000 Parks Maintenance - - 2,000,000 (2,000,000) - Vacant Building Maintenance 700,000 - - - 700,000 CIP Percentfor art - - - 161,518 161,518 CIP Contingency - - - 215,357 215,357 62 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget NON-DEPARTMENTALGENERAL FUND F'Y2024 General Change Funding Change TOTAL Fund Our Future Expense Changes New Projects Capital Improvement Projects Fund 7,307,135 - 3,100,000 - 10,407,135 Westside New Project(Art) - - - 150,000 150,000 Restoration for City Buildings (Earthquake)(Insurance Reimbursed) 2,000,000 (2,000,000) - - - [One-Time] Set Aside Hand Held Radios[One Time] 3,700,000 (3,700,000) - - - Historic Signs/Markers[One Time] 30,000 (30,000) - - - Fleet Fund: Fleet-Replacement Fund 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 Streets Fleet Equipment Replacement - - 1,700,000 - 1,700,000 Public Safety Apparatus/Vehicle - - 4,000,000 - 4,000,000 Replacement Remove FY2023 Vehicles for New 283,300 (283,300) 728,600 (728,600) - Positions Vehicles for New Positions in FY2024 - 135,000 - 908,350 1,043,350 Fleet-Centralized Fleet Maintenance 6,800,439 138,500 - 6,938,939 Parts/Equipment/Labor - 717,954 - - 717,954 Golf Fund: Golf(Living Wage and CCAC Salary 370,100 - - - 370,100 Adjustments Transfer) Golf ESCO Payment Transfer[One-Time] 493,239 (493,239) Prior Year Golf ESCO Payment Transfer[One-Time] - 510,427 - - 510,427 Current Year Golf Admin Fee Transfer 339,335 16,967 356,302 Golf IMS Fee Transfer 350,000 - - - 350,000 Rosepark Infrastructure renewal 500,000 - - - 500,000 Information Management Services Fund: IMS Services 17,729,541 - 430,054 - 18,159,595 IMS Personnel Costs - 592,968 - - 592,968 IMS New Personnel - 559,064 - - 559,064 IMS Contractual and Other Increases - 1,395,354 - - 1,395,354 Versaterm Transfers to IMS from the General Fund(Fire, Police,Attorneys - 578,975 - - 578,975 Office) Radio System Transfer to IMS from General Fund(Fire, Police, E911, Public - 241,645 - - 241,645 Services) PSB Printer Maintenance Transfer to IMS 55,000 55,000 from General Fund(Police) New CAP Software($350,000 one-time) $250,000 on going 350,000 350,000 AutoCAD Transfer to IMS from the - 22,000 - - 22,000 General Fund(Public Services) Zoom Enterprise Software- BA#5 - 25,000 - - 25,000 Budget for New Positions - 127,750 - 59,164 186,914 63 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget NON-DEPARTMENTALGENERAL FUND F'Y2024 General Change Funding Change TOTAL Fund Our Future Expense Changes Budget for Prior Year New Positions 141,000 (141,000) 66,000 (66,000) - Remove[One-Time]? Insurance and Risk Management Fund 3,125,591 - - - 3,125,591 Salary Adjustments - 143,763 - - 143,763 - Insurance Premium Increases - 142,130 - - 142,130 - Life Savings Account - 500,000 - - 500,000 - Public Utilities Funds: Public Utilities- HIVE : Pass through 61,000 - - - 61,000 expense Public Utilities-Land Swap payment 200,000 - - - 200,000 Public Utilities-Assistance 100,000 - - - 100,000 Water Usage Study-Transfer to Public - 100,000 - - 100,000 Utilities[One-Time] Street Lighting Street lighting(GF owned properties) 50,000 - - - 50,000 Street Lighting in Enhanced Service 54,420 - - - 54,420 Areas(GF owned properties) SAA Street Lighting 80,000 80,000 Redevelopment Agency Fund RDA Tax Increment 15,532,420 453,333 - - 15,985,753 Housing Plan- Land Discounts and - - 2,590,000 - 2,590,000 Financing(transfer to RDA) Special Revenue Fund Environmental Assessment Fund 100,000 100,000 Emergency Demolition Revolving Fund 200,000 (200,000) [Remove FY2023 One-Time] Sustainability Fund - GF E&E Operation Funding 1,248,126 410,674 - - 1,658,800 Remove Transfer for One Time Projects (Community Lawn Mower Exchange, EV 419,000 (419,000) - - - Charging Stations) Transfer EV Charging Station to Public 45,000 (45,000) Services Change in Transfer - (257,900) - - (257,900) Police Department and Racial Equity In Policing Funding Police Officer Training[One-Time 205,400 (150,400) - - 55,000 $150,4001 Social Worker Program - - 646,017 60,536 706,553 Increased Mental Health Responders 562,500 - 450,000 121,074 1,133,574 Diversifying Public Safety Civilian - - 842,000 (842,000) - Response Models Holding Account Commission of Racial Equity&Policing 120,000 - - - 120,000 REP Commission Peer Court Support 20,000 - - - 20,000 REP FY2021 Holding Account [FY2021 1,781,192 (1,781,192) - 1,781,192 1,781,192 REP Fund Balance] 64 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget NON-DEPARTMENTALGENERAL FUND FY2024 General Change Funding Change TOTAL Fund Our Future Expense Changes Sales Tax Option-Transit Plan - Transit Plan-Service for Key Routes - - 6,600,000 400,000 7,000,000 Transit Plan-On Demand Ride Services (Smaller Service Area) - - 1,900,000 1,100,000 3,000,000 Transit Plan- UTA Outreach - 100,000 100,000 Mayor-Receptions/Employee Appreciation 20,000 - - - 20,000 ACE Fund 200,000 - - - 200,000 Board and Commissions honoraria 26,000 26,000 Remove City County Building Branding 75,000 (75,000) - - - [One-Time] Diversity Outreach(CoCs,etc.) 3,000 - - - 3,000 Healthcare Innovation- Biohive(BA#6) 50,000 50,000 - - 100,000 Biohive Branding and Marketing[One 35,000 - - - 35,000 Time] Housing Authority Transitional Housing 85,000 - - - 85,000 Legal Defenders 1,404,677 118,390 - - 1,523,067 Local Business Marketing Grants 20,000 - - - 20,000 Music Licensing Fees 7,000 2,000 9,000 National League of Cities and Towns 11,535 1,262 - - 12,797 NBA All Star Game 1,000,000 (1,000,000) - Open Streets Initiative(Closing Main Street 150,000 (150,000) - Fridays and Saturdays)[One Time] Rape Recovery Center 30,000 30,000 Sister Cities 10,000 - - 10,000 Salary Contingency - 760,000 - - 760,000 Salt Lake City Arts Council 800,000 - - - 800,000 Salt Lake City Foundation 3,000 - - - 3,000 SL Area Chamber of Commerce 50,000 5,000 - - 55,000 Remove Shooting Range Remediation 500,000 (500,000) [One-Time] Suazo Membership(BA#6) 45,000 - - - 45,000 Remove Hispanic Entrepreneurs Program 30,000 (30,000) - - [One-Time] Sugar House Park Authority 224,795 45,456 - - 270,251 Tracy Aviary 719,367 44,159 - 763,526 US Conference of Mayors Membership 12,242 - - - 12,242 Utah Economic Development Corporation 108,000 - - - 108,000 Utah League of Cities and Towns 183,563 49,911 - 233,474 Membership Wasatch Community Gardens-Apprentice - 50,000 - - 50,000 Gardner(from Apprentice Funding) World Trade Center Membership 50,000 - - - 50,000 65 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget NON-DEPARTMENTALGENERAL FUND F'Y2o24 General Change Funding Change TOTAL Fund Our Future YWCA- FJC Wrap around services 45,000 - - - 45,000 TOTAL • • Revenue Summary General Fund Funding Our Future TOTAL FY2024 FY2024 FY2024 Budget Budget Budget Ongoing Revenue Sources 403,565,741 51,935,086 455,500,827 New Revenue Sources 2,489,227 - 2,489,227 Change in One-Time Revenue Sources (13,888,165: 403,034 (13,485,131) TOTAL Citywide Expense 392,166,803 52,338,120 444,504,923 Expense Summary General Fund Funding Our Future TOTAL FY2024 FY2024 FY2024 General Fund Department Expense Budget FTE Budget FTE Budget FTE City Council 5,610,149 36.00 - - 5,610,149 36.00 Council Non Departmental 350,100 - - - 350,100 - Mayor's Office 6,820,067 34.00 - - 6,820,067 34.00 Attorney's Office 10,150,844 60.50 - - 10,150,844 60.50 Community and Neighborhoods 27,829,264 187.00 4,210,689 8.00 32,039,953 195.00 Economic Development 4,035,091 22.00 - - 4,035,091 22.00 Finance Department 12,168,296 81.70 - - 12,168,296 81.70 Fire Department 50,863,404 388.00 1,400,953 14.00 52,264,357 402.00 Human Resources 4,659,300 33.40 - - 4,659,300 33.40 Justice Court 5,489,720 42.00 - - 5,489,720 42.00 Police Department 97,959,909 672.00 13,016,903 89.00 110,976,812 761.00 Public Lands 25,313,600 138.35 1,848,671 19.50 27,162,271 157.85 Public Services 39,565,691 244.00 3,539,718 26.00 43,105,409 270.00 E911 Services 10,412,910 92.00 846,846 8.00 11,259,756 200.00 Non Departmental 90,938,457 - 27,474,340 - 118,412,797 - TOTAL Citywide Expense 392,166,803 2,030.95 52,338,120 164.50 444,504,923 2,295.45 FY2024 Budget Revenue 392,166,803 52,338,120 444,504,923 Expense 392,166,803 2,030.95 52,338,120 164.50 444,504,923 2,195.45 Difference - - - FY2023 Budget Revenue 378,322,311 47,215,097 425,537,408 Expense 378,322,311 1,990.95 47,215,097 144.00 425,537,408 2,134 5 Difference - - - 66 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Revenue and Other Sources FY23 Beginning Balance 35,460,387 Eliminate FY2023 GF Funding(Including Funding (20,007,135) Our Future, less Debt Service) Eliminate FY2023 Class C Funding (3,000,000) Eliminate FY2023 Impact Fees Funding (3,360,193) Eliminate FY2023 funding from'/4C Sales Tax (8,000,000) Eliminate FY2023 Funding from additional (1,093,059) sources FY2024 GF Funding(Excluding transfer directly 19,508,661 to Debt Service) FY2024 General Fund Funding our Future 3,626,875 FY 2024 Less amount transferred directly to debt service (10,301,526) FY2024 Class C Funding(Excluding transfer 3,500,000 directly to Debt Service) FY2024 Impact Fee Funding 2,968,850 FY2024'/4C Sales Tax Funding 8,191,470 FY2024 Community Development Block Grant — FY2024 Funding from additional sources 2,031,300 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (5,934,757) 29,525,630 Expenses and Other Uses FY22 Beginning Balance 35,460,387 Eliminate FY2023 Ongoing Commitment (5,122,554) Funding Eliminate FY2023 Maintenance Funding (2,173,008) Eliminate FY2023 Capital Projects Funding (9,869,877) Eliminate FY2023'/4C Sales Tax Funding (5,000,000) Eliminate FY2023 General Fund One Time Sources [City Building Earthquake Repair, (5,700,000) Radios] Eliminate FY2023 Class C Funding (3,000,000) Eliminate FY2023 Streets Impact Fee Funding (1,522,000) Eliminate FY2023 Parks Impact Fee Funding (1,838,193) Eliminate FY2023 Community Development (722,000) Block Grant Eliminate FY2023 Cost Overrun and Percent for (364,250) Art Eliminate FY2023 Transfer to Debt Service GF (148,505) FY2024 Ongoing Commitment General Fund 2,100,000 Funding 67 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget FY2024 Maintenance Funding GF, Funding our — Future FY2024 Capital Projects Funding 10,524,921 FY2024 Class C Funding(Excluding transfer 3,500,000 directly to Debt Service) FY2024 Streets Impact Fees Funding 240,000 FY2024 Parks Impact Fees Funding 2,728,850 FY2024'/4C Sales Tax Funding 7,700,000 FY2024 Funding from additional sources 500,000 FY2024 Community Development Block Grant — Cost Overrun and Percent for art 409,089 Transfer to Debt Service-General Fund 150,500 Transfer to LEA Fire Stations#3 1,180,800 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (6,426,227) 29,034,160 Budgeted revenues and other sources over 491,470 491,470 (under)expenditures and other uses Curb and Gutter(FC 20) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,000 No Changes — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 3,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,000 No Changes Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 3,000 Budgeted revenues and other sources over — (under)expenditures and other uses Misc.Special Service Districts(FC 46) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 1,700,000 Change in revenue from New Assessment Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 1,700,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 1,700,000 Change in expense from New Assessment 68 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 1,700,000 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Street Lighting Enterprise Fund(FC 48) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance-base lighting 4,302,222 Street lighting fees 417,463 Change in interest income 21,500 Transfer from the General Fund (60,000) Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 378,963 4,681,185 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance-base lighting 5,757,825 2.7 Personnel services (0.2) 19,640 Charges for service 266,707 Debt services (23) Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2.6 286,324 6,044,149 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (1,362,964) (under)expenditures and other uses Water Utility(FC 51) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 108,196,368 Change in Metered Water Sales (5,220,600) Change in Interest Income (426,662) Other Revenue 775,972 Grants 10,951,380 Impact Fees 215,330 Sale of Equipment (500) Transfer from General Fund (200,000) Bond proceeds 62,346,000 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 68,440,920 176,637,288 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 132,752,815 288.2 Personnel services 10.1 2,956,730 Operating&maintenance 713,830 69 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Charges for service 2,055,019 Capital outlay 292,080 Capital improvements 35,111,000 Cost of bond issuance 346,000 Debt services 3,726,313 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 298.2 45,200,972 177,953,787 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (1,316,499) (under)expenditures and other uses Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 196,630,907 Change in Sewer Utility Service Revenue 9,563,000 Other Revenues (17,500) Change in Interest Income (97,636) Other sources 25,407 WIFIA Loan 32,552,000 Bond Proceeds 51,285,000 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 93,310,271 289,941,178 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 255,914,580 127.7 Personnel Services 3.2 1,561,004 Operating&Maintenance 231,330 Charges for Service 1,356,811 Capital Outlay 1,579,812 Capital Improvements 33,429,863 Cost of bond issuance 285,000 Debt Service 7,474,222 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 130.8 45,918,042 301,832,622 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (11,891,444) Storm Water Utility(FC 53) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 13,476,733 Change in Stormwater Utility Service Revenue 1,232,173 Change in Interest Income 43,986 70 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Other Operating Revenues (40,000) Impact Fees 125,000 Bond Proceeds 5,028,000 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 6,389,159 19,865,892 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 18,699,722 40.5 Personnel Services 3.0 687,016 Operating&Maintenance 78,900 Charges for Service 738,903 Capital Outlay 742,000 Capital Improvements 1,820,000 Cost of Bond Issuance 28,000 Debt Service 152,933 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 43.4 4,247,752 22,947,474 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (3,081,582) Airport Revenue and Other Sources FY 23 Beginning Balance 302,268,600 Increase in operating revenues 43,554,000 Increase in passenger facility charges — Increase in grants and reimbursements 41,070,500 Increase in customer facility charges — Increase in airport general revenue bonds — Increase in interest income 16,619,900 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 101,244,400 403,513,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY 23 Beginning Balance 1,073,499,700 619.3 Increase in operating expenses 13,452,297 Decrease in Passenger Incentive Rebate (1,068,400) Decrease in interest expense (14,805,200) Decrease in bond expense (1,365,100) Increase in capital equipment 4,347,200 Decrease in capital improvements projects (553,621,500) Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 639.3 (553,060,700) 520,438,997 71 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (116,926,000) Waste and Recycling Fund(FC S7) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 19,538,377 Residential Service Fee Increase 1,488,156 Special Event Fee Changes 25,000 Increase in Debt Financing Proceeds and Misc 2,556,200 Revenue Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,069,356 23,607,733 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 21,538,279 56.0 Salary Changes 481,531 Container Maintenance Service Worker(Grade 1.0 63,247 14)(10 months) Capital Purchase Increase 2,385,363 PUBS Allocation 205,132 Fleet Fuel and CNG Increase 130,314 Tipping Fee Increases 353,000 Fleet Maintenance Increase 52,092 Lease Debt Payment Increase 407,526 Increase in Operating and Admin Expense 678 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 57.0 4,078,883 25,617,162 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (2,009,429) Environment and Energy Fund(FC57) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 1,919,726 Decrease in Revenue (460,774) Change in Transfer from GF for Operations 403,563 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (57,211) 1,862,515 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,414,392 7.0 Salary Changes 125,061 Air Quality Incentives Program Air Quality Program Coordinator(Grade 26)(10 1.0 96,094 Months) 72 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Air Quality Incentives 230,000 EV Station O&M transfer to Public Services (45,000) Decrease One-Time Project Funding (875,000) Decrease in Program Operating and Admin (26,469) Expenses Decrease in PT/Hourly Budget (42,448) Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 8.0 (537,762) 2,876,630 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (1,014,115) Golf . Operations Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 6,857,548 Green Fees 191,951 Driving Range 263,134 Cart Rental 123,725 Retail Sales 226,242 Other 280,646 General Fund Transfer(IMS,Admin Fees) 16,967 Cash transfer to CIP Fund 3,000,000 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,102,665 10,960,213 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 10,182,777 33.7 Personnel Changes 0.5 429,265 Retail Merchandise 172,000 Operating Supplies 144,369 Increase for Utilities 173,130 Charges and Services 168,532 Debt Service Payments on Carts (19,497) Operating Equipment Cash Purchases (432,239) Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 34.2 635,560 10,818,337 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses 141,876 DedicatedGolf Fund-CIP Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 4,703,128 Green Fees 14,538 73 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Transfer from GFfor ESCO 32,188 Transfer from GF for Rose Park Infrastructure _ Renewal Cash Transfer from Golf Operations (3,000,000) Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (2,953,274) 1,749,854 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 4,543,239 Debt Service Payments(ESCO) 17,188 Capital Expenditures 2,560,220 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 2,577,408 7,120,647 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (5,370,793) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,925,000 No Change — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 3,925,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,800,385 No Change — Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 3,800,385 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses 124,615 Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 15,835,024 Fuel revenue impact 997,166 Work Order billings 1,238,937 Car Wash billing increase 2,524 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 2,238,627 18,073,651 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 15,877,680 46.0 Personnel Changes — 283,174 74 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Fuel impact 974,735 Worker's Comp&Unemp benefits inflation 7,707 factor Inflation factor water,sewer, storm, natural gas 130,809 Miscellaneous 28,174 Inflation factor Finance administration fees 13,885 Parts 18% increase 656,732 Sublet 10% Increase 107,063 Car wash debris clean out decreased (50,000) Workforce Evolution Plan 39,570 Transfer to GF 359,454 Total Expenses and Other Uses Budget 46.0 2,551,303 18,428,983 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (355,332) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 12,991,968 Transfer from GF for vehicles for new positions 1,043,350 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,043,350 14,035,318 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 14,548,352 Debt Service-Current year lease purchases (210,533) Debt Service- Prior years (177,253) Increase in cash purchase of vehicles 346,405 FY23 Used Fleet fund balance to purchase (1,500,000) vehicles New vehicle prep, parts, outsourced labor& 19,446 admin New GF cash purchases for vehicles for new 1,043,350 positions Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — (478,585) 14,069,767 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (34,449) Information Management Services(FC 65) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 30,532,167 Change in Transfer from General Fund 2,547,386 Change in Transfer from Other Funds 1,618,683 75 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Transfer from GF for Versaterm 578,975 Transfer from GF for Radio System 241,645 Transfer from Other Funds for Radio System 158,355 Transfer from GF for PSB Printers 55,000 Transfer from GF for AutoCAD 22,000 Transfer from GF for Zoom Enterprise Software 25,000 Transfer from GF for CAP Software 350,000 Remove Funding for FY2023 New Positions (207,000) Transfer from GF for new positions 186,921 Appropriation of Fund Balance — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 5,576,965 36,109,132 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 30,532,167 92.0 Personnel Changes — 1,482,665 Contractual Changes 1,133,509 Consulting Services 270,000 Azure for Software Development 70,000 Treasury Management software 300,000 Radio project completion(One-Time from Fund 300,000 Balance) Radio Build Out for Public Services(One-Time 1,750,000 from Fund Balance Versaterm(From PD&Fire) 555,733 PSB Copy Machines(From PD) 65,000 Zoom Enterprise(BA#5 New) 25,000 New CAP Software 350,000 CAD Software(From PU and PS) 45,000 Radio ongoing maintenance-Transfer(from 400,000 Fire, Police, E911 and Public Services) PC Replacement 118,402 New FTEs for the GF 186,921 Cyber Security Penetration Testing 30,000 Council Remote Meeting Professional Services 30,000 New Positions -Office Facilitator(From Part-time)(Grade 19) 1.0 47,776 (12 Months) -Cyber Security Analyst(Grade 30)(10 Months) 1.0 118,331 Field Support(Grade 27)(10 Months) 1.0 104,831 Data Analyst(Grade 30)(10 Months) 1.0 118,331 Change Manager(Grade 32)(10 Months) 1.0 128,452 Web Content Specialist(Grade 23)(10 1.0 89,669 Months) 76 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget -Communication Engineer(Grade 34)(10 1.0 139,655 Months) - Director of Communications/Branding(Grade 1.0 165,506 38)(10 Months) Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 100.0 8,024,781 38,556,948 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (2,447,816) County Quarter Cent Sales Tax forTransportation Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 9,600,000 Change in revenue 100,000 Remove FY2021 State Initiated County Local Option Sales Tax — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 100,000 9,700,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 9,458,748 — Transfer to General Fund for Personnel 49,782 Remove FY2023 Transfer to CIP (8,000,000) Remove FY2023 Transfer to Debt Services (1,100,000) Transfer to CIP- Projects 8,191,470 Transfer to Debt Services 1,100,000 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 241,252 9,700,000 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — OperatingCDBG Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 4,670,517 Change in Federal Funds 927,246 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 927,246 5,597,763 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 4,958,433 Change in Federal Funds 639,330 Change in Transfer to Housing — Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 639,330 5,597,763 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — 77 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget OperatingMisc.Grants Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 34,158,918 Change in Federal Grant Revenue — Change in Program Income — Change in Appropriation of Cash — Change in ARPA Funding (26,768,821) Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (26,768,821) 7,390,097 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 26,614,153 Change in Salary and Benefits 93,733 American Rescue Plan Grant - Revenue Replacement[Transfer to General Fund] (19,890,111) Salary Restoration — Other 572,322 Appropriation of HOME Program Income — Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (19,224,056) 7,390,097 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Other Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 300,000 Transfer from GF- Environmental Assessment Fund — Transfer from GF- Emergency Demolition (200,000) Revolving Fund Weed Abatement FY2024 Appropriation of Cash 300,000 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 100,000 400,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 300,000 Enviromental Assessment Fund — Emergency Demolition Revolving Fund [One- (200,000) Time] Add FY2024 Weed Abatement 300,000 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 100,000 400,000 78 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Donation Fund(FC 77) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 2,920,250 Change in Revenue from GUCOA (2,420,250) Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (2,420,250) 500,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 2,870,250 Change in GUCOA Expense (2,370,250) Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (2,370,250) 500,000 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 16,217,000 Change in Transfer from CDBG — Change in Program Income — Change in Interest Income 15,000 Change in Miscellaneous Income/Sale of (200,000) Property Change in Appropriation of Cash (10,825,000) Change in Loan Principal and Escrow Payments 195,000 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (10,815,000) 5,402,000 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 25,779,253 Change in Loan Disbursements and Associated (10,200,000) Expenses Change in Funding Our Futures Expenses — Change in Other Expenses (14,389,253) Change in Interest Expense (45,000) Change in Note Payable&T&I Payments (190,000) Change in Transfer to General Fund — Change in Transfer to RDA Fund — Change in Transfer to CDBG Fund — Appropriation from Program Income — 79 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (24,824,253) 955,000 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses 4,447,000 Debt Service(FC 81) Revenue and Other Sources FY2023 Beginning Balance 32,037,989 Change in G.O. Property Tax (26,597) Change in State Reimbursement 1,100,000 Change in Debt Service from RDA (7,906) Change in Transfer from Transportation (1,100,000) Change in Transfer from General Fund 155,175 Change in Transfer from CIP (144,500) Change in Lease Payments 328,234 Change in Transfer from Refuse (320) Change in Transfer from Fleet (489) Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 303,597 32,341,586 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 33,658,558 Change in Debt Service Payments and related (565,579) expenses Remove One-Time Transfer Out from North Temple Viaduct Bond RDA Reimbursement to — North Temple Project Area Lease Payments 1,102,000 One-time transfer out from North Temple to (1,000,000) Housing One-time transfer out from North Temple to 1,700,000 Housing Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,236,421 34,894,979 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (2,553,393) Governmental Immunity Revenue and Other Sources 3,964,523 New Revenue Options Correct property tax amount (188,576) Change in Amount from Other Funds — Insurance Changes — Remove One-Time — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (188,576) 3,775,947 go Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget OTHER Fiscal Year 2024 ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,169,767 9.0 Salary Changes 94,357 Deputy Risk Manager[Ongoing]9 Mths 1.0 105,888 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 10.0 200,245 3,370,012 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses 405,935 Insurance and Risk Fund(FC 87) Revenue and Other Sources 54,679,000 New Revenue Options 785,894 Change in amount from GF 182,300 Change in Amount from Other Funds 4,830,000 Insurance Changes Remove One-Time Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 5,798,194 60,477,194 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 54,679,000 7.7 Salary Changes 235,194 Remove Transfer out of Fund Balance for Premium Holiday FY2024 Property Insurance Premium Increases 233,000 Premium Holiday General Fund 2,152,569 Airport Fund 598,723 Public Utilities Fund 449,841 Refuse Fund 52,990 Golf Fund 25,664 Fleet Fund 47,389 IMS Fund 86,548 Governmental Immunity 9,059 Insurance&Risk 5,613 RDA 28,637 Insurance Changes 3,101,484 Life 500,000 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 7.7 7,526,711 62,205,711 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses (1,728,517) 81 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget LBA KEY CHANGES ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Local Building Authority(FC66) Revenue and Other Sources FY2022 Beginning Balance 1,855,325 Change in Building Lease Revenue (344,700) Change in Transfers from General Fund (1,174,025) Change in Transfer from CIP Impact Fee 1,180,800 Appropriation of Cash — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (337,925) 1,517,400 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 1,855,325 Change in Debt Service (337,925) Change in Project Costs — Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (337,925) 1,517,400 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — — 82 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Central Business District Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 27,573,150 (2,928,456) 24,644,694 Interest Income 23,500 (23,500) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 27,596,650 (2,951,956) 24,644,694 Expenses and Other Uses Taxing Entity Payment(60%) 13,283,651 (3,661,944) 9,621,707 Eccles Debt Service 3,260,239 1,904,870 5,165,109 Eccles Debt Service Block 70 RDA Match 3,260,239 51,682 3,311,921 Transfer to Administration(10%) 2,757,315 (292,846) 2,464,469 TI Reimbursements Qazz Arena, 222 Main) 1,400,000 (100,000) 1,300,000 Miscellaneous Property Expense 1,000,000 — 1,000,000 Gallivan Maintenance 566,822 7,153 573,975 Capital Project-Gallivan Master Planning 100,000 409,738 509,738 Gallivan Administration 365,323 7,452 372,775 Gallivan Programming 250,000 — 250,000 Parking Ramp Leases 69,000 6,000 75,000 Capital Project-Japantown 250,000 (250,000) — Capital Project- Main Street Closure Design 150,000 (150,000) — Capital Project-Open Streets Initiative Main 150,000 (150,000) — Street Capital Reserve- Property Acquisition 734,061 (734,061) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 27,596,650 (2,951,956) 24,644,694 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — West Capitol Hill Revenue and Other Sources Interest Income 100,000 (100,000) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 100,000 (100,000) — Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve- Discretionary Project Funding 100,000 (100,000) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 100,000 (100,000) — Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — 83 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget West Temple Gateway Revenue and Other Sources Interest Income 5,000 (5,000) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 5,000 (5,000) — Expenses and Other Uses Transfer to Administration 5,000 (5,000) — Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 5,000 (5,000) — Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Depot Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 3,999,587 1,422,848 5,422,435 FY'23 Transition Appropriation — 1,805,473 1,805,473 Interest Income 50,000 (50,000) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,049,587 3,178,321 7,227,908 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve- Infrastructure Improvements — -{Holding Account}- 3,680,056 3,680,056 Primary Housing Fund(20%) 799,917 284,570 1,084,487 Transfer to Administration(15%) 599,938 213,427 813,365 TI Reimbursement Gateway 2,000,000 (2,000,000) — Transfer to Secondary Housing — 1,000,000 1,000,000 Capital Reserve-Commercial Assistance Program — 500,000 500,000 -{Holding Account}- Miscellaneous Property Expense 125,000 25,000 150,000 Revolving Loan Fund Repayment 524,732 (524,732) — Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 4,049,587 3,178,321 7,227,908 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Granary District Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 633,546 469,763 1,103,309 84 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget FY'23 Transition Appropriation - 291,284 291,284 Interest Income 15,000 (15,000) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 648,546 746,047 1,394,593 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve-Commercial Assistance Program - 1,003,435 1,003,435 -{Holding Account}- Primary Housing Fund(20%) 126,709 93,953 220,662 Transfer to Administration(15%) 95,032 70,464 165,496 Miscellaneous Property Expense 5,000 - 5,000 Capital Reserve-Strategic Intervention 421,805 (421,805) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 648,546 746,047 1,394,593 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - North Temple Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 444,053 564,662 1,008,715 FY'23 Transition Appropriation - 343,277 343,277 Interest Income 5,000 (5,000) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 449,053 902,939 1,351,992 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve-Strategic Intervention - -{Holding Account}- 285,490 285,490 Primary Housing Fund(20%) 88,811 112,932 201,743 Capital Reserve-Commercial Assistance Program - 543,277 543,277 -{Holding Account}- Transfer to Administration(10%) 44,405 56,467 100,872 Capital Reserve- Infrastructure Improvements 284,753 (184,753) 100,000 -{Holding Account}- Capital Project-School Construction Fund 31,084 39,526 70,610 (10%)* Capital Project-City Creek Daylighting - 50,000 50,000 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 449,053 902,939 1,351,992 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - 85 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Revenue and Other Sources Transfer From CBD Taxing Entity Payments 3,260,239 1,904,870 5,165,109 Transfer From CBD Eccles Debt Service RDA 3,260,239 51,682 3,311,921 match Tax Increment 1,922,323 (93,095) 1,829,228 Reserve for Eccles Debt 2,469,853 (1,722,352) 747,501 Interest Income 2,500 (2,500) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 10,915,154 138,605 11,053,759 Expenses and Other Uses Regent Street Bond Debt Service 1,488,928 6,582,096 8,071,024 Eccles Theater Debt Service 8,069,529 (6,540,562) 1,528,967 Taxing Entity Payments(30%) 576,697 (27,929) 548,768 Eccles Theater-Operating Reserve for Ancillary 475,000 — 475,000 Spaces Fundraising Fulfillment 125,000 — 125,000 Capital Project- Bennion Jewlers Relocation — 100,000 100,000 Capital Reserve- Regent Street Parking Structure 100,000 — 100,000 -{Holding Account}- Regent Street Maintenance 80,000 — 80,000 Regent Street Event Programming — 25,000 25,000 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 10,915,154 138,605 11,053,759 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — North Temple Viaduct Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 1,205,109 1,569,310 2,774,419 Interest Income 1,500 (1,500) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,206,609 1,567,810 2,774,419 Expenses and Other Uses Debt Service Payment to Salt Lake City 1,188,532 1,544,271 2,732,803 Transfer to Admin(1.5%) 18,077 23,539 41,616 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,206,609 1,567,810 2,774,419 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — 86 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget QuadrantNorthwest Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 903,100 495,448 1,398,548 Interest Income 5,000 (5,000) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 908,100 490,448 1,398,548 Expenses and Other Uses TI Reimbursement NWQ Phase 1 632,170 346,814 978,984 Capital Reserve-Shared Costs 95,310 44,544 139,854 -{Holding Account}- Transfer to Primary Housing(10%) 90,310 49,545 139,855 Transfer to Admin(10%) 90,310 49,545 139,855 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 908,100 490,448 1,398,548 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - Stadler Rail Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 72,420 68,877 141,297 Interest Income 500 (500) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 72,920 68,377 141,297 Expenses and Other Uses TI Reimbursement 58,436 61,666 120,102 Transfer to Primary Housing(10%) 7,242 6,888 14,130 Transfer to Admin(5%) 7,242 (177) 7,065 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 72,920 68,377 141,297 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - State Street Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 2,631,183 1,792,628 4,423,811 FY'23 Transition Appropriation - 1,364,709 1,364,709 Interest Income - - - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 2,631,183 3,157,337 5,788,520 87 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve-Strategic Intervention - - 3,364,709 3,364,709 {Holding Account}- Capital Reserve-Commercial Assistance Programs - 1,239,049 1,239,049 -{Holding Account}- Transfer to Admin(10%) 263,118 179,263 442,381 Capital Project- Ballpark Planning - 300,000 300,000 Transfer to Primary Housing-SLCSD HSG - 259,976 259,976 (10%) Transfer to Primary Housing(10%) 263,118 (80,713) 182,405 Capital Reserve-Property Acquisition 2,104,947 (2,104,947) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2,631,183 3,157,337 5,788,520 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - Revenue and Other Sources Tax Increment 1,477,727 1,176,054 2,653,781 FY'23 Transition Appropriation 802,208 802,208 Interest Income - - - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,477,727 1,978,262 3,455,989 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Program-Accessory Dwelling Units -{Holding Account} 1,455,680 1,455,680 Capital Reserve-Commercial Assistance Programs - 500,000 500,000 -{Holding Account}- Capital Reserve-Strategic Intervention - -{Holding Account}- 500,000 500,000 Taxing Entity Payment(50%of County tax) 224,966 70,916 295,882 Transfer to Admin(10%City%SLCSD only) 118,218 135,325 253,543 RDA Arts&Culture Program - 150,000 150,000 Transfer to Primary Housing(10%) 147,773 (3,181) 144,592 Transfer to Primary Housing-SLCSD HSG - 120,786 120,786 (10%) County Administration 26,996 8,510 35,506 Capital Reserve-Property Acquisition 959,774 (959,774) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,477,727 1,978,262 3,455,989 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - 88 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Revolving Loan Fund Revenue and Other Sources FY17 Beginning Balance Principal Payments 65,000 131,750 196,750 Interest on Loans 30,000 — 30,000 Interest on Investment 250,000 (250,000) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 345,000 (118,250) 226,750 Expenses and Other Uses Available to Lend 345,000 (118,250) 226,750 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 345,000 (118,250) 226,750 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Program Income Fund Revenue and Other Sources Parking Structure Income 1,243,335 (999) 1,242,336 Rents 215,700 (54,436) 161,264 Loan Repayments 39,000 (360) 38,640 Interest Income 50,000 (50,000) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,556,835 (107,143) 1,449,692 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Project-Sugarhouse DI Demo — 550,000 550,000 Professional Services 300,000 30,000 330,000 Miscellaneous Property Expense 300,000 30,000 330,000 Gallivan Maintenance — 214,692 214,692 Marketing and Sales 25,000 — 25,000 Capital Reserve-Commercial Loans 931,835 (931,835) — JHolding Account)- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,556,835 (107,143) 1,449,692 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Secondary Housing Fund(formerly Project Area Housing Fund) Revenue and Other Sources Transfer from DID — 1,000,000 1,000,000 89 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Interest Income 10,000 (10,000) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 10,000 990,000 1,000,000 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserves- housing Property Acquisition 1,000,000 1,000,000 -{Holding Account}- Capital Reserves-Accessory Dwelling Unit 91-ine Pilot Program 10,000 (10,000) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 10,000 990,000 1,000,000 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - Primary Housing Fund(formerly Citywide Housing Fund) Revenue and Other Sources Transfer from Depot 799,917 284,570 1,084,487 Transfer from State street 263,118 179,263 442,381 Transfer from 9 Line 147,773 117,605 265,378 Transfer from Granary 126,709 93,953 220,662 Transfer from North Temple 88,811 112,932 201,743 Transfer from NWQ 90,310 49,545 139,855 Loan Repayments 23,000 567 23,567 Transfer from Stadler Rail 7,242 6,888 14,130 Interest on Loans 3,000 (621) 2,379 Interest Income 50,000 (50,000) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,599,880 794,702 2,394,582 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve-Shared Equity Housing - -{Holding Account}- 1,013,820 1,013,820 Capital Reserve- Housing Development Loans - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 {Holding Account}- Capital Reserve-SLCSD Housing - -{Holding Account}- 380,762 380,762 Capital Reserve- Housing Property Acquistion 1,599,880 (1,599,880) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,599,880 794,702 2,394,582 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - go Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Westside Community Initiative • Revenue and Other Sources UIPA Housing Allocation 500,000 901,589 1,401,589 FY'23 Transition Appropriation 433,880 433,880 Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 500,000 1,335,469 1,835,469 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Reserve-Shared Equity Housing — -{Holding Account}- 1,835,469 1,835,469 Capital Programs- Housing Development Loan Program 500,000 (500,000) — -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 500,000 1,335,469 1,835,469 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — DevelopmentHousing Revenue and Other Sources Funding Our Future Land Discounts and 2,590,000 — 2,590,000 Financing Mayor's request for additional affordable 1,000,000 700,000 1,700,000 housing Loan Repayments 1,370,000 (1,225,610) 144,390 Interest on Loans 255,000 (178,437) 76,563 Interest on Investment 15,000 (15,000) — Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 5,230,000 (719,047) 4,510,953 Expenses and Other Uses Capital Program- Housing Development Loans 4,230,000 280,953 4,510,953 -{Holding Account}- Capital Program- Housing Property Acquisition 1,000,000 (1,000,000) - -{Holding Account}- Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 5,230,000 (719,047) 4,510,953 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses — Administration Revenue and Other Sources Transfer from Central Business District 2,757,315 (292,846) 2,464,469 91 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget REDEVELOPMENT FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 FUND Recommended Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Budget Transfer from Depot District 599,938 213,427 813,365 Transfer from State Street 263,118 179,263 442,381 Transfer from 9 Line 118,218 135,325 253,543 Transfer from Granary District 95,032 70,464 165,496 Transfer from Northwest Quadrant 90,310 49,545 139,855 Transfer from North Temple 44,405 56,467 100,872 Transfer from North Temple Viaduct 18,077 23,539 41,616 Transfer from Stadler Rail 7,242 (177) 7,065 Transfer from West Temple Gateway 5,000 (5,000) - Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 3,998,655 430,007 4,428,662 Expenses and Other Uses RDA Personnel 2,480,095 21 276,684 2,756,779 Administrative Fees 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Operating&Maintenance 300,000 75,000 375,000 Charges and Services 218,560 78,323 296,883 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 3,998,655 21 430,007 4,428,662 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses - GRAND TOTALS TOTAL Revenue 63,300,899 11,776,928 75,077,827 TOTAL Expense 63,300,899 11,776,928 75,077,827 92 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Mayor's Recommended Budget MULTI-AGENCY DRUG TASK FORCE KEY CHANGES ISSUE FY2023 Adopted Full Time Changes from FY2024 Budget Budget Equivalent FY2023 Budget Multi-Agency Drug Task Force(FC41) Revenue and Other Sources FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,762,560 Remove FY2023 Funding (1,762,560) Appropriation of Cash Balance from 1,038,284 Forfeiture Appropriation of Cash Balance from 359,071 Restitution Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (365,205) 1,397,355 Expenses and Other Uses FY2023 Beginning Balance 1,762,560 Remove FY2023 Expense (1,762,560) Change in Operating Expense 1,397,355 Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (365,205) 1,397,355 Budgeted revenues and other sources over (under)expenditures and other uses 0 93 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank • • i nancia • o Icles illillid " � - - �.�.-•'-r "'"ram ..- y w lu .� . IRIIIIIIII Writ 41 wp .gyp s�;,;: :^:� ,� �� �7`� �i �'� �i• � %ram-' _ �^� ;� ., �ystYy �' }' `" 1� ,�� � �i• K � ry_�,..:, �' � 's4` -y'.Y'� siiY��{■ _ "P Ri�� .. ._--,i��L 1� �� This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Financial Policies Debt Policies The City's debt policy is defined by State statute with the goal of maintaining the City's"Aaa/AAA"general obligation bond ratings, as rated by Moody's and Fitch respectively, or other rating agencies. Accordingly,the City will continually monitor all outstanding debt issues, as well as trends in key economic, demographic and financial data, including a periodic review of important debt ratios and debt indicators. The City will make all debt service payments in a timely and accurate manner.The City will fully comply with all IRS arbitrage rebate requirements and the bonds' post issuance compliance regulations. In the preparation of official statements or other bond related documents,the City will follow a policy of full and complete disclosure of its financial and legal conditions. The City's practice is to also adhere to the following guidelines: 1. State law limits general obligation bonded debt use for general purposes to 4 percent of the adjusted fair market value of the City's taxable property. 2. State law also limits general obligation bonded debt for water, sewer and lighting purposes to 4 percent of the adjusted fair market value of the property plus any unused portion of the amount available for general purposes. 3. The City combines a pay-as-you-go strategy with long-term financing to keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit the"Aaa/AAA"general obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity in an emergency. 4. The City limits debt to projects that cannot be reasonably funded in a single year and to terms that are consistent with the useful life of the project being undertaken. S. The City seeks the least costly financing available. All debt commitments are reviewed centrally by the City Treasurer who looks for opportunities to combine issues or for alternative methods that will achieve the lowest possible interest rates and other borrowing costs. 6. The City will continually analyze whether it would be advantageous to refund bond issues based on market and budgetary conditions. 7. The City will issue Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes only for the purpose of meeting short-term cash flow liquidity needs. In order to exempt the notes from arbitrage rebate,the sizing of the notes and the timing of cash flows will meet the"safe harbor" provisions of Federal Tax Code. 8. The City will invest bond and note proceeds as well as all funds that are pledged or dedicated to the payment of debt service on those bonds or notes either in accordance with the terms of the borrowing instruments, or if silent or less restrictive,then according to the terms and conditions 97 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies of the Utah State Money Management Act and Rules of the State Money Management Council. 9. The City will maintain outstanding debt at a level such that revenues are equal to or greater than 200% of the maximum annual debt service. 10. The City currently has $123,320,000 of outstanding general obligation debt.This is well below the 4 percent(of fair market value) statutory limits, which places the City's general obligation borrowing limit at $1,993,410,800. The City currently does not use general obligation debt for water, sewer or lighting purposes. However,the full 8% may be used for water, sewer and electric purposes but if it is so used,then no general obligation bonds may be issued in excess of 8%for any purpose. General Purposes Water, sewer, and Total Legal Debt Margin: 4% lighting 80/0 General Obligation $ 1,993,000,000 $ 1,993,000,000 $ 3,986,000,000 Debt Limit Less Outstanding General Obligation $ (123,000,000) $ — $ (123,000,000) Bonds Legal Debt Margin $ 1,870,000,000 $ 1,993,000,000 $ 3,863,000,000 2021 Fair market value of property -- $49,835,270,000 Source: Utah State Property Tax Division SIGNIFICANT FUTURE DEBT PLANS Lease Revenue Bonds, Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds The City administration continuously evaluates the City's funding of its Capital Improvement Program, and proceeds of lease revenue bonds and additional bonds will be considered as one of the sources for funding the City's capital infrastructure. The City has no short-term plans to issue lease revenue bonds nor sales and excise tax revenue bonds. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA (SAA) The City has no short-term plans to issue assessment area bonds. 98 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS A special bond election held on November 8, 2022 gave voter authorization to the City to issue up to $85 million in general obligation bonds to fund all or a portion of the costs of acquiring, improving, renovating and upgrading various parks, trails, open space and related facilities.The first block of approximately$25 million of the authorization is planned to be issued in Fall 2023. MAJOR PROGRAMS AND FUTURE DEBT CONSIDERATIONS The City plans to issue approximately$400 million in additional general airport revenue bonds in calendar year 2023 related to the $5.13 billion "New SLC" formerly known as the Airport Redevelopment Program. The program is currently expected to be completed by 2027. Public Utilities revenue bonds of up to $118 million are expected to be issued in FY2024 to fund the Department of Public Utilities capital improvement program. A major focus of the Department's budget is the rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure. The largest planned projects are the continued work on the new water reclamation facility to meet regulatory requirements, improvements to three water treatment plants, improvements for storage reservoirs, phased construction of a new water conveyance line to expand service and provide redundancy, and water, sewer and storm water utility infrastructure work in conjunction with street improvements projects. The Department will also be utilizing proceeds from a $348,635,000 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act(WIFIA) loan secured to finance the construction of the water reclamation facility. The loan will be drawn through 2025. The current outlook includes issuance of approximately$238 million in Public Utilities revenue bonds from FY 2025 through FY 2028 to fund planned capital construction. 99 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies DEBT STRUCTURE Salt Lake City Outstanding Debt Issues (RDA bond information has been excluded from this list) (as of June 30,2023) Amount of Final Principal Original Issue Maturity Date Outstanding GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT Series 2010B(Public Safety Facilities) $ 100,000,000 6/15/2031 $ 44,975,000 Series 2013A(Refunded a portion of Series 2004A) 6,395,000 6/15/2024 735,000 Series 2015A(Refund 2013B Sports Complex) 14,615,000 6/15/2028 5,740,000 Series 2017B(Refund Portion of 2010A) 12,920,000 6/15/2030 9,620,000 Series 2019(Streets)(Refund Series 2017A) 22,840,000 6/15/2039 14,465,000 Series 2020(Streets) 17,745,000 6/15/2040 12,200,000 Series 2021 (Streets) 20,660,000 6/15/2041 16,230,000 Series 2022(Streets) 21,785,000 6/15/2042 19,355,000 TOTAL: $ 123,320,000 PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS Series 2009(Taxable) $ 6,300,000 2/1/2031 $ 2,520,000 Series 2010 Revenue Bonds 12,000,000 2/1/2031 5,370,000 Series 2011 Revenue Bonds 8,000,000 2/1/2027 2,250,000 Series 2012 Improvement and Refunding'04 Bonds 28,565,000 2/1/2027 4,160,000 Series 2017 Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding(2008) 72,185,000 2/1/2037 58,535,000 Series 2020 Revenue Bonds 157,390,000 2/1/2050 157,390,000 Series 2020B Improvement Bonds(WIFIA loan)Revenue Bonds 348,635,000 8/1/2058 13,267,190 Series 2022 Revenue Bonds 329,025,000 2/1/2052 329,025,000 TOTAL: $ 572,517,190 SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS Series 2013B(Streetcar/Greenway Projects) $ 7,315,000 10/1/2023 $ 355,000 Series 2014B(CIP Projects) 10,935,000 10/1/2034 7,460,000 Series 2016A(Refund 2009A) 21,715,000 10/1/2028 13,880,000 Series 2019A(Refund 2007A) 2,620,000 4/1/2027 1,270,000 Series 2019B(Refund 2013A)(Federally Taxable) 58,540,000 4/1/2038 56,790,000 Series 2021 (Refund 2013B,LEA 2013A&2014A) 15,045,000 10/1/2034 14,840,000 Series 2022A(Refunding 2012A) 8,900,000 10/1/2032 8,320,000 Series 2022 B 40,015,000 10/1/2042 40,015,000 Series 2022 C(Federally Taxable) 24,240,000 10/1/2032 24,240,000 TOTAL: $ 167,170,000 MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS Series 2014(1300 S&1700 S Streets) $ 8,800,000 4/1/2024 $ 960,000 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY LEASE REVENUE BONDS Series 2013A(Glendale Library) $ 7,180,000 10/15/2023 $ 330,000 Series 2016A(Fire Station#14) 6,755,000 4/15/2037 5,220,000 Series 2017A(Fire Station#3) 8,115,000 4/15/2038 6,950,000 TOTAL: $ 12,500,000 AIRPORT REVENUE BONDS Series 2017A $ 826,210,000 7/1/2047 $ 808,925,000 Series 2017B 173,790,000 7/1/2047 169,590,000 Series 2018A 753,855,000 7/1/2048 753,855,000 Series 2018B 96,695,000 7/1/2048 96,695,000 Series 2021A 776,925,000 7/1/2051 775,520,000 Series 2021 B 127,645,000 7/1/2051 127,475,000 TOTAL: $ 2,732,060,000 3,608,527,190 100 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies FY 2023=24 Revenue This section includes a general discussion of Salt Lake City's major revenue sources.The City has eight major funds: General Fund, Golf Fund, Refuse Fund, Water Fund, Sewer Fund, Storm Water Fund, Street Lighting Fund,Airport Fund, and the Redevelopment Agency(RDA) Fund.These funds and their major revenue sources are discussed below. REVENUE POLICIES 1. The City projects its annual revenue through analytical processes and adopts its budget using conservative estimates and long-term forecasting. 2. The City minimizes using one-time revenue to fund programs incurring ongoing costs. 3. Once taxes and fees are assessed,the City aggressively collects all revenues due. 4. The City pursues abatement programs and other ways to reduce the effect of taxes and fees on those least able to pay. S. To the extent that the City's revenue base is insufficient to fund current services,the City will explore all potential options to reduce the cost of government services; examine the effect of reducing the level of government services; and finally, consider new user fees or increases in existing fees. Should these three alternatives fail to offer a suitable solution, the City may increase tax rates as a last resort. 6. The City reviews the budget for those programs that user fees can reasonably fund.This review results in a policy that defines cost, specifies a percentage of the cost to be offset by a fee, and establishes a rationale for the percentage. When establishing these programs,the City considers the following: a. Market pricing; b. Increased costs associated with rate changes; c. The ability of users to pay; d. The ability of individuals to make choices between using the service and paying the fee or not using the service; e. Other policy considerations. (For example, setting fines high enough to serve as a deterrent; or pricing fees to even out demand for services.) 7. The City adjusts user fee rates annually based on an analysis of the criteria established in policy six above. The City pursues frequent small increases as opposed to infrequent large increases. 8. The City considers revenue initiatives consistent with the following: a. Finding alternatives that address service demands created by the City's large daytime population; b. Finding alternatives that allocate an equitable portion of service costs to tax-exempt institutions; 101 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies c. Finding alternatives to formulas that use residential population to distribute key revenues such as sales tax and gasoline tax; and d. Pursuing opportunities for citizen volunteerism and public/private partnerships. FORECASTING METHODOLOGY Salt Lake City revenue forecasts are compiled using historical,time-series, trend, and simulation models.These models focus primarily on past experiences and trends, but modifications are made based on simulations reflecting anticipated economic activities and proposed initiatives.The projected revenues using these models are based upon anticipated economic growth, anticipated fee or tax increases, as well as any new initiatives being proposed. The City has several financial analysts that regularly track and report on revenue collections and projections. Projections are monitored for precision, and revisions are made throughout the year.This information is used to help forecast the upcoming year's revenue. As part of the Citys modeling efforts,year-to-date cumulative revenue collections are monitored and compared to previous years to identify changes in revenue streams that may indicate areas of concern. GENERAL FUND The General Fund is the principal fund of the City and is used to account for resources traditionally associated with governments that are not required to be accounted for in another fund.The General Fund accounts for the normal activities of the City, such as Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks and Community Development. These activities are funded through taxes, fees,fines, and charges for services. The majority of the City's General Fund revenue comes from three sources -sales taxes $166,213,479 (37.39%), property taxes $114,514,375 (25.76%), and licenses and permits $40,878,112(9.20%).These sources are impacted by local and national economic trends and activities. Major increases or decreases in any one of these three taxes can have a significant impact on City operations. SALES TAX Sales tax revenue is a principal source of Salt Lake City's General Fund revenue, providing 37.39% of total projected revenue in FY 23-24. Sales tax revenue is projected to increase in FY 23-24 as a result of robust retail spending, including online sales. Sales tax revenue is forecast using time series and trend analysis in conjunction with various modeling scenarios which anticipate economic events that may impact the City. The forecast includes comparing the State of Utah's 102 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies projections with the City's projections to determine if the City's projections are reasonable. PROPERTY TAX Property tax revenue is a significant source of Salt Lake City's General Fund revenue, providing 25.76% of total projected revenue in FY 23-24. Property tax revenue is projected to increase slightly in FY 23-24. Salt Lake County calculates the Certified Tax Rate and expected revenue for each taxing entity. State Tax Code requires taxing entities to adopt the county's property tax revenue forecast as their own unless they go through the truth-in-taxation process and raise the rate above the certified rate. LICENSES AND PERMITS License and Permit revenue is another major source of General Fund revenue, comprising 9.20% of projected General Fund revenue in FY 23-24.This revenue is forecast using time series and trend analysis, as well as input from business and construction representatives. License revenue includes various business taxes, such as airport parking and transient room taxes, that are projected to increase over the previous year. Permit revenue is expected to decrease in FY 23-24 as construction activity in the City levels out. OTHER GENERAL FUND REVENUE The remaining General Fund revenues make up 27.65% of the total and are comprised of the following: a. Franchise Taxes b. Intergovernmental Revenue c. Charges, Fees, and Rentals d. Fines e. Parking Meter Collections f. Interest Income g. Miscellaneous Revenue,Transfers and Interfund Reimbursements. 103 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies The following table summarizes total General Fund Revenue by major category. GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Property Taxes 91,020,673 94,654,243 99,342,715 99,474,985 103,862,288 111,194,231 114,514,375 Sales and Use 64,512,732 99,599,360 116,199,002 122,654,953 160,262,167 149,414,508 166,213,479 Taxes Franchise Taxes 30,301,186 27,042,921 26,863,146 23,952,168 11,750,309 11,657,128 12,348,127 Licenses and 28,651,754 36,960,240 32,637,293 36,428,067 43,313,623 40,736,114 40,878,104 Permits Intergovernment 6,049,454 6,006,496 5,086,254 4,781,753 5,960,591 4,644,622 5,134,621 al Revenue Charges, Fees, 5,252,494 5,573,679 4,283,760 4,842,902 5,840,601 4,432,794 4,881,922 and Rentals Fines 7,251,705 5,140,777 3,753,706 3,539,471 3,717,871 3,765,174 4,063,548 Parking Meter 3,549,584 3,509,898 2,771,331 1,915,888 2,997,333 2,635,475 2,801,089 Collections Interest Income 1,290,000 3,904,270 2,910,778 821,887 1,346,160 2,071,154 8,000,000 Miscellaneous 5,255,384 5,256,974 4,521,107 2,834,061 7,871,697 3,438,710 3,502,359 Revenue Interfund 11,054,188 16,363,850 20,574,064 20,971,348 21,717,361 24,431,717 26,131,213 Reimbursement General Fund 254,189,154 304,012,708 318,943,156 322,217,484 368,640,001 358,421,627 388,468,837 Revenue Other Financing Sources: Transfers 6,954,179 7,564,418 6,800,493 8,447,676 19,920,935 28,821,993 9,938,944 Proceeds from Sale of Property Revenue and 261,143,333 311,577,126 325,743,648 330,665,160 388,560,936 387,243,620 398,407,781 Financing Sources Property Tax for 11,317,136 10,284,464 13,245,339 14,020,140 15,456,918 15,456,918 15,545,000 RDA* Available Fund Balance/Cash 387,868 380,025 1,510,094 4,885,620 25,527,005 25,135,631 30,552,142 Reserves Total General 272 848,337 322,241,615 340,499,081 349,570,920 429,544,859 427,836,169 444,504,923 Fund 104 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies GENERAL FUND REVENUE SOURCES 450,000,000 400,000,000 350,000,000 300,000,000 250,000,000 0 .boll 200,000,000 150,000,000 100,000,000 50,000,000 0 a� `�J�00 Period Ending ❑ Available Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Property Tax for RDA* Proceeds from Sale of Property ❑ Transfers ❑ Interfund Reimbursement ❑ Miscellaneous Revenue ❑ Interest Income 0 Parking Meter Collections ❑ Fines ❑ Charges,Fees,and Rentals Intergovernmental Revenue ❑ Licenses and Permits Franchise Taxes ❑ Sales and Use Taxes Property Taxes 105 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND The Golf Enterprise Fund accounts for the operations at six public golf course locations; Bonneville, Forest Dale, Glendale, Mountain Dell, Nibley Park, and Rose Park. The City's golf courses are operated as an enterprise fund where revenue collected at the golf course through user fees supports operational and maintenance expenses, capital improvement costs, and any debt that the golf courses may incur. Revenue in this fund is generated by user fees, including green fees, CIP $2 fees, cart rental fees, range ball fees, merchandise purchases, lessons, concessionaire rental fees, etc. Revenue is projected based on historical patterns and forecasts of trends in the local market area. The FY 23-24 Golf Fund budget for revenue and expense follows closely with 5-year historical averages and recent demand for golf rounds and merchandise. In addition, strategic price increases are being implemented that will have an impact on revenues for FY 23-24. Driving Range revenue increases will coincide with new range building for winter use at Glendale. Z -. •• " - f io6 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies GOLF FUND REVENUE SUMMARY Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY 22-23 FY 23-24 Golf Revenue Green Fees 3,603,022 3,569,078 4,259,235 5,525,522 5,495,684 4,841,101 5,033,052 Golf Car Rental 1,509,488 1,461,066 1,471,019 2,225,396 1,982,077 2,134,499 2,258,224 Driving Range Fees 287,606 322,722 223,848 472,678 460,253 389,486 652,620 Retail Merchandise 719,688 781,478 646,749 827,626 981,853 797,758 1,024,000 Sales CIP Fee on rounds, 310,524 298,724 324,383 395,791 568,048 709,889 724,427 passes Miscellaneous 1,150,279 1,038,407 1,417,090 2,235,387 2,807,165 2,687,943 3,017,744 Total Golf Fund 7,580,607 7,471,475 8,342,324 11,682,400 12,295,080 11,560,676 12,710,067 GOLF FUND REVENUE SUMMARY 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 p ❑ Miscellaneous ❑ CIP Fee on rounds,passes 6,000,000 ❑ Retail Merchandise Sales ❑ Driving Range Fees Golf Car Rental 4,000,000 ❑ Green Fees 2,000,000 0 N C N C�� Q N1' Q ,�4i P NC Q, Lti � Period Ending 107 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies REFUSE ENTERPRISE FUND The Refuse Enterprise Fund Class consists of two funds: • Operations Fund • Environmental & Energy Fund Revenue for the Operations Fund comes from refuse collection fees, inter-fund reimbursements, and miscellaneous revenue. City households that receive these services include most single-family, duplex, and triplex homes. They are charged refuse collection fees based on the size of their refuse can(s).These fees are calculated to recover the fund's operational costs when combined with the other sources of revenue described above.The Operations Fund revenue is forecasted based on known factors such as the number of refuse cans in service, along with scheduled events such as equipment replacement and changes in contractual agreements. Voluntary residential curbside glass recycling service, introduced in FY 12-13, continues to be offered. Those using this service are charged a separate monthly fee. The Environmental & Energy(E&E) Fund receives an owner's distribution from the Landfill (Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Facility/SLVSWMF) on an ongoing basis.This is the primary source of revenue for this fund. As the Landfill garbage tonnage has decreased in recent years, so has the related dividend to its partners. Revenues from recycling proceeds have been another source of revenue in the past for this fund. Recycling proceeds have not been budgeted in FY 23-24 due to the volatility of global recycling markets. Current, ongoing initiatives and operational expenses are partially funded by landfill revenue and E&E cash balance. Beginning in FY 21-22, the E&E Division also began receiving revenue from the General Fund.This amount has increased each year with the goal of fully supporting the E&E Division through the General Fund in FY 24-25. In prior years, E&E Fund projects have been funded by one-time distributions from the landfill.A distribution of$5,500,000 was put into the E&E Division in FY 10-11 and funded projects on air quality, energy efficiency, sustainable food, and other projects. In FY 16-17, $1,500,000 of landfill distribution funds were transferred from the Waste & Recycling Operations Division to the E&E Division to continue to fund projects. In FY 17-18, another one-time landfill distribution of$1,200,000 was received. No other one-time funding distributions from the landfill are expected. io8 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies Refuse Fund Revenue Summary Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Refuse Revenue Landfill /SLVSWMF 710,483 681,152 557,041 558,398 449,013 456,000 450,000 Dividends Refuse Collection 11,118,760 11,397,708 11,223,400 11,209,725 12,580,305 14,321,577 15,809,733 Fees Interfund Reimb. & 829,324 1,766,089 1,235,243 639,909 1,711,293 1,863,726 2,210,726 Misc Total Refuse Fund 12,658,567 13,844,949 13,015,684 12,408,032 14,740,611 16,641,303 18,470,459 REFUSE FUND REVENUE 20,000,000 - 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 c 0 10,000,000 ❑ Interfund Reimb&Misc 8,000,000 ❑ Refuse Collection Fees ❑ Landfill/SLVSWMF Dividends 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 > c� 6�a'tio arIv ��Ja,L`ti aoo�,L"� ak°0 ti0 Q �`6 Q �°� NZ- Period ti� Ending log Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies WATER UTILITY FUND The Water Utility Fund operates as an enterprise fund.The Water Utility exists to provide treated water to current city residents, maintain the City's water infrastructure, and to engage in conservation activities related to the City's water supply for future generations. The service area of the fund covers a total of 141 square miles and includes more than 360,000 residents. The service area includes the geographic area within the Salt Lake City boundaries, as well as the east bench of the Salt Lake Valley outside Salt Lake City boundaries, including to portions of the cities of Millcreek, Holladay, Cottonwood Heights, South Salt Lake, Murray, and Midvale.The Water Utility also has jurisdictional responsibilities to protect about 190 square miles of source water area in the headwaters of the Wasatch Mountains.The Water Utility provides administrative utility billing services for the Sewer Utility,the Stormwater Utility, the Street Lighting Utility,the Refuse Fund, and the Hive Program. Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary billing rates needed to generate enough revenue to fund the operations of the utility. Independent rate studies are conducted every several years to gather public input and to structure rates in accordance with industry standards and community values. Budgeted FY 23-24 revenues reflect a proposed rate increase of 18%and decreased water use due to drought. The rate increase is applied to the current four-tiered, inclining block rate structure. The proposed budget includes a drought surcharge on block 3 and 4 water use. Revenue received from metered water usage is the Water Utility's main source of operating revenue (95%). Other revenue categories include interest income, miscellaneous revenue, impact fees, and inter-fund reimbursements. 110 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies WATER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Water Revenue Water Sales 73,199,176 75,103,958 81,995,776 84,073,083 74,116,952 99,642,660 94,343,390 and Service Interest Income 725,120 1,424,203 970,343 658,820 (340,275) 883,164 456,502 Permits, Fines 453,482 523,688 480,673 953,791 423,530 460,970 271,000 &Other Interfund 2,267,207 2,394,985 2,370,157 2,921,829 2,972,142 3,171,284 4,215,396 Billing Services Total Water 76,644,985 79,446,834 85,816,949 88,607,523 77,172,349 104,158,078 99,286,288 Fund �0 WATER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY 0 00 0 00 0 `:o 00 0 '00 0 60 00 0 "0 N 00 0 �O ❑ Interfund Billing Services 000 Permits,Fines&Other 00 El Interest Income O Water Sales and Service 1-1O 00 O 00 O 0 a��r� Z5 `b ,titi 4b Period Ending 111 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies SEWER UTILITY FUND The Sewer Utility Fund operates as an enterprise fund. The Sewer Utility exists to manage the collection and treatment of wastewater within Salt Lake City's corporate boundaries. The Sewer Utility is increasing capacity and expanding the service of the sewer collection system to meet growth requirements related to the new State Correctional Facility, the Airport expansion, and new development anticipated in the Northwest Quadrant of Salt Lake City.The Sewer Utility operates the City's sewer collection and sewer treatment infrastructure which includes 667 miles of pipeline, several pump stations, and a water reclamation facility.The water reclamation facility is being rebuilt to meet environmental regulations, and construction is occurring in phases to meet the regulatory compliance deadline of January 1, 2025.Additional construction will continue past this date. The first phase of construction began in FY 19-20, and additional construction and design work for future phases is ongoing. Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary billing rates needed to generate enough revenue to fund the operations of the utility.The Sewer Utility charges customers based on average winter water use volume and strength of produced waste. Independent rate studies are made every several years to gather public input and to structure rates in accordance with industry standards and community values. Budgeted FY 23-24, revenues reflect the anticipated impacts of sewer flows in differing customer classes and a proposed 15% rate increase. The rate increase is distributed within a seven-tiered block rate structure and is necessitated by the construction of the water reclamation facility. In FY 23-24,the main source of operating revenue for the sewer utility fund will be charges for sewer services(98%). Other revenue categories include fines, interest income, survey permits, and miscellaneous revenue. 112 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies SEWER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Sewer Revenue Sewer Services 33,735,176 39,687,904 45,142,610 50,823,100 57,803,567 66,833,500 76,387,000 Interest Income 1,387,613 2,161,835 1,035,061 438,896 (40,179) 947,084 849,448 Permits, Fines, 545,939 298,228 285,917 504,477 840,246 362,500 354,500 and Other Total Sewer 35,668,727 42,147,967 46,463,588 51,766,473 58,603,634 68,143,084 77,590,948 Fund 80000 SEWER FUND REVENUE 000 `10 ,000 '000 6q 000 000 Sq 000 000 4q 000 0�000 Permits,Fines,and Other � ❑ Interest Income 0000 El Sewer Services OO 2q 000'000 7q 000 000 0 113 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies STORM WATER UTILITY FUND The Stormwater Utility operates as an enterprise fund. It exists to convey runoff and stormwater and to maintain the quality of stormwater discharge within Salt Lake City boundaries. It is also responsible for mitigating flooding caused by stormwater runoff.The Stormwater Utility operates stormwater collection infrastructure system which includes 350 miles of drainage pipe and 27 lift stations. Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary fees needed to generate enough revenue to fund the operations of the utility. The Utility charges customers for these services based on units calculated as equivalent residential units(ERU), or 1/4 acre determined by area of the customer's property that is impervious.The FY 23-24 budget includes the 10% rate increase or approximately $0.69 per equivalent residential (ERU) per month. Revenues received from stormwater fees are the Utility's main source of operating revenue (99%). Other revenue categories include interest income and miscellaneous revenue. UY S �P]rA14� 5 y+ s 5 114 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies STORM Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Storm Water Revenue Storm Water Services 8,510,707 9,555,773 10,720,158 10,703,273 11,944,768 12,331,733 13,563,906 Interest Income 115,773 184,128 129,047 105,061 32,158 75,000 118,986 Permits, Fines, & Other 47,327 50,687 85,397 94,137 163,559 93,000 53,000 Total Storm Water Fund 8,673,807 9,790,589 10,934,602 10,902,471 12,140,485 12,499,733 13,735,892 STORM WATER FUND REVENUE 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 0 ❑ Permits,Fines,&Other 6,000,000 Interest Income ❑ Storm Water Services 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 ^b �10j � m�r�' Q?,r ' Period Ending 115 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies STREET LIGHTING FUND The Street Lighting Utility operates as an enterprise fund. It exists to manage the City's street lighting infrastructure facilitating safer vehicle and pedestrian travel at night. Streetlights are provided at each intersection on long blocks and as needed on mid-blocks. SLCDPU provides base-level street lighting service on a city-wide basis and enhanced street lighting services for decorative lighting to two residential neighborhoods and to one commercial area.Total system conversion to high-efficiency lighting remains a high priority of this utility. Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary fees needed to generate enough revenue to fund the utilities operations. Street lighting fees are based on units calculated as an equivalent residential unit(ERU)which is determined by front footage of a property. The base lighting rates were established in 2013 at $3.73 per month per ERU.The average Salt Lake City residence is one ERU, while commercial, institutional, and industrial properties vary. (ERU). Rates were also established in 2015 for each enhanced lighting service area. Street Light Fees proposed in the FY 23-24 budget include a rate increase of 10% or$0.37 per equivalent residential (ERU) per month for the base fee. Revenue received from street lighting fees are the Utility's main source of revenue(99%). Other revenue categories include interest income and miscellaneous revenue. 41 31 n r i + rJAL xk � Ir r++F I- � .�:.fig- ... •'.� -A 3 4R h d y � �- I � I 7 �• I I �.3�.I -- �� � fJY .tea- � # �+•5 .. �..a _ `'.xTY ,.4' �;:� 116 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies STREET LIGHTING FUND REVENUE SUMMARY Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Street Lighitng Services 4,222,564 4,207,007 4,301,424 4,230,395 4,264,579 4,174,622 4,592,085 Interest Income 48,352 88,339 147,727 38,047 30,215 22,500 44,000 Other 7,786 180,558 300 200 204,751 100 100 Total Street Lighting Fund 4,278,702 4,475,905 4,449,450 4,268,642 4,499,545 4,197,222 4,636,185 STREET LIGHTING FUND REVENUE 5,000,000 - 4,000,000 3,000,000 c 0 Other 2,000,000 ❑ Interest Income ❑ Street Lighitng Services 1,000,000 0 r� �M ,� Period Ending 117 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND The Salt Lake City Department of Airports manages Salt Lake City International Airport(SLCIA),Tooele Valley Airport, and South Valley Regional Airport(SRVA). Salt Lake City International Airport(the Airport) serves a multi-state region and consists of three air carrier runways and a general aviation runway and is classified as a large hub airport. The Airport's extensive route network served over 25.5 million passengers in FY 21-22. In September 2020, the Airport opened portions of phase one of the new airport,which included a new terminal,the gateway center, concourse A West, and a new parking garage.A portion of Concourse B West was opened in October 2020. By the end of April 2021,the old Airport facilities were demolished to make way for phase two of the new airport. In May of 2023, Concourse A East will be completed with five gates opening and the remaining 17 gates opening in October of 2023. In addition,the Central Tunnel and five gates on Concourse B East will be complete by the Fall 2024, and 4 more gates will begin in the Fall 2025. Tooele Valley Airport is a general aviation reliever airport to SLCIA. It has one runway, and support services are on-demand only. South Valley Regional Airport is also a general aviation reliever airport. It also has one runway and is a base for a Utah National Guard military helicopter unit. The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund. It is not supported by property taxes,general funds of local governments, or special district taxes. Capital funding requirements for FY 23-24 are met from earnings, passenger facility charges, customer facility charges, general airport revenue bonds (GARBS), Federal Aviation Administration grants under the Airport Improvement Program, and State grants. Major Sources of Airport Fund Revenue Revenues are forecast by reviewing and analyzing lease agreements, capital projects, product inflation, and passenger levels.The FY 23-24 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures.Airport non- aeronautical revenues for FY 23-24 are projected to increase by 10.4% compared to the FY 22-23 budget as more passengers are traveling and spending money at the Airport. A major source of revenue(53%) is generated by the airlines. Air carriers pay on a cost-of-service basis for the services they receive. Rates are set annually based on direct operating cost, cost of capital, and amortization on asset investment. The formula used for this system is considered a hybrid structure in the aviation industry and is based on the ten-year airline use agreement(AUA)that went into effect on July 1, 2014. It provides $1 per enplaned passenger revenue sharing, not to exceed 30% of net remaining revenue, and is credited to the air carriers 118 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies monthly. Enplaned passengers are projected to increase by 1.4%to 14.1 million enplanements over the FY 22-23 budget of 13.9 million enplanements. The second major source of revenue (39%) is generated from the Airport concessions.This includes revenue from food and retail concessions as well as car rental and parking fees. For FY 23-24, retail concessions,food and beverage, rental cars, and parking are all projected to increase because of the increase in passengers as well as an increase in the overall amount spent per passenger traveling through the Airport.The remaining revenues are generated through cost recovery of ground transportation costs, lease contracts on buildings, office space, and hangars. The Airport also receives a portion of the State aviation fuel tax. In FY 11-12,the Airport began collecting customer facility charges(CFC)to fund a new rental car facility.These charges increased from $4 to $5 in FY 12-13 and will remain at$5 for FY 23-24.The customer facility charges will meet the financial requirements to build the rental car service and quick turnaround facilities, plus the portion of the garage related to rental cars as well as any future rental car capital improvement projects.The rental car service and quick turnaround facilities were completed in FY 15-16, but the Airport will continue to collect CFCs for these facilities to reimburse the airport for its cash used to fund the projects in advance of CFC collections versus bonding for these project costs. PaT .f ..��r�'�`` „C.J s-ter- } r-.-��*' .:i:: a - ". �-. r• � - ` 119 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS OPERATING REVENUE COMPARISON Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Actual FY Budget FY Budget FY 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 Operating Revenue: Concession 87,274,206 92,910,800 75,372,300 63,478,800 113,311,500 120,529,200 131,281,900 Airline 70,571,102 75,636,600 77,312,400 109,691,200 136,820,000 153,278,900 153,278,900 Other 20,708,160 18,992,400 18,738,500 19,224,200 22,379,500 21,661,000 54,462,300 Rental Total Operating 178,553,468 187,539,800 171,423,200 192,394,200 272,511,000 295,469,100 339,023,100 Revenue AIRPORT OPERATING REVENUE 300,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000 7 in 0 150,000,000 75 Other Rental +Fr77 El Airline 100,000,000 ❑ Concession 50,000,000 0 N1 1`b N° �40' Poi Pow Poi Poi Pcc R5`�d� Period Ending 120 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies RDA FUND The primary revenue source for the RDA's redevelopment efforts is tax increment. Tax increment is the increase (or"increment") in the property taxes generated within a project area over and above the baseline value of property taxes that were in place at the time a project area was established. Property values increase as an area is revitalized through investment,thereby creating tax increments. When an RDA project area is established,the RDA and the participating taxing entities enter into agreements that determine the amount of tax increment that will continue to flow to the taxing entities, and the portion that will be reinvested by the RDA into the project area for a defined period of time.The participating taxing entities continue to receive the baseline property tax during the life of a project area. The establishment of a project area and the collection of tax increment funds must be approved by the RDA Board of Directors and any participating local taxing entities (e.g., Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City School District, Metro Water District, Central Utah Water Project, Salt Lake Mosquito Abatement, and Salt Lake City Library). Not all taxing entities participate in every project area. Per Utah State Statute, tax increment proceeds must be spent within the project area where they originated or be found by the RDA Board of Directors to directly impact that project area. In addition to tax increment revenues from its various project areas, the RDA also has the following revenue sources: 1. Interest Income.The RDA receives interest on cash balances. 2. Temporary Property Income.The RDA receives lease revenues from various rentals, including several parking garages in the Central Business District Project Area. 3. RDA Loan Interest Income. The RDA receives interest generated from loans it administers. The amount of interest received varies depending on the number of outstanding loans at any given time. 4. Land Sale Proceeds.The RDA routinely sells property as part of its redevelopment efforts. RDA revenues are forecast for each project area by analyzing previous years'tax increments received and adjusting conservatively based on current real estate market conditions. Other income from interest, lease revenues, and RDA loan interest is also considered. The FY 23-24 forecasted RDA Fund revenue budget is $48,725,167. 121 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies REDEVELOPMENT Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 FY19-20 FY20-21 FY21-22 FY22-23 FY23-24 Redevelopment Agency Revenue Block70 3,895,176 1,892,423 2,159,178 1,629,755 803,534 2,846,637 1,924,823 1,829,228 Central Business 26,874,661 23,135,282 25,461,421 32,565,335 31,251,766 28,369,709 27,596,650 24,644,694 District West Capitol Hill 562,604 548,155 1,547,706 40,318 711,967 106,173 100,000 - West Temple 11,626 703,224 60,753 (1,670,316) 17,246 6,448 5,000 - Gateway Depot District 3,616,380 3,806,559 3,895,569 5,533,602 5,525,331 5,238,774 4,049,587 5,422,435 Granary District 426,686 530,373 625,878 781,648 944,077 995,615 648,546 1,103,309 Housing Development - - - 2,590,000 2,583,445 20,629 5,230,000 4,776,563 Trust Fund North Temple 195,081 294,575 425,243 543,258 640,558 685,381 449,053 1,008,715 North Temple 343,699 542,952 1,123,104 1,558,258 2,103,730 2,579,427 1,206,609 2,774,419 Viaduct 9-Line - - - - - 1,871,603 1,477,727 2,653,781 State Street - - - - - 3,289,619 2,631,183 4,423,811 Sugar House 2,397,460 3,593 1,126 1,106 190,038 289 - - Program Income 1,589,699 2,142,572 2,441,059 1,690,964 1,440,529 1,951,066 1,556,835 1,411,052 Northwest 198 1,688,689 1,044,303 908,100 1,398,548 Quadrant Stadler Rail - - - 70,419 102,594 109,392 72,920 141,297 Westside Community Initiative(NWQ 409,031 512,241 500,000 1,401,589 Housing Fund/ U I PA) Primary Housing Fund(Citywide 662,815 454,620 350,096 315,971 81,125 78,632 76,000 2,379 Housing) Secondary Housing Fund 22,484 30,782 45,303 43,617 13,227 11,491 10,000 - (Project Area Housing) Revolving Loan 386,599 3,855,771 761,162 583,574 1,144,760 63,436 345,000 226,750 Total Redevelopment 40,984,970 37,940,881 38,897,598 46,277,707 49,651,647 49,780,865 48,788,033 53,218,570 Agency Revenue Citywide Housing Fund and Project Area Housing Fund includes interest and land sale proceeds only. Revolving loan fund includes interest only. 122 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE SUMMARY ❑ Block 70 2 Central Business District ❑ West Capitol Hill p 0 West Temple Gateway ❑ Depot District -- ❑ Granary District ❑ Housing Development Trust Fund North Temple ❑ North Temple Viaduct 9-Line ❑ State Street ❑ Revolving Loan �C �� � Q) �ry �ar\�% ��aryM 44. Period Ending 123 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies Outstanding Legislative Intents FY 2015 to FY 2023 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FY 2023- Boarded Building Fee - It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration for a timeframe when the Council can consider an updated boarded-building fee, or request that the Attorney's Office provide a draft directly to the Council Office. FY 2023 Administration Response-A transmittal will soon be submitted by the department with the requested fee and details regarding the program associated with the fee. FY 2022- Update Boarded-Building Fee- It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that includes the full City costs of monitoring and responding by Police, Fire and other City departments at these properties. FY 2023 Administration Response-See the response to the FY 2023-Boarded Building Fee intent above. Prior Year's Response- The cost analysis related to this Legislative Intent has been finalized. The program is being developed. FY 2023-Open and Public Meetings Act(OPMA)- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to ensure that any City loan or grant processes comply with the Open and Public Meetings Act(OPMA). The Council could request that the City Attorney's Office develop an ordinance more specifically codifying this understanding. FY 2023 Administration Response-Response forthcoming. FY 2023-Ordinance Governing Donations to the City- It is the intent of the Council that a new, more streamlined donation ordinance be developed by the City Attorney's Office for consideration by the Council in Fall, 2022. The Council further requests that while this ordinance is being prepared,the Administration create a tracking sheet for any donations, and work across City departments on a consistent process to support continued transparency and documentation of donor intents. It is the Council's intent to rescind the current ordinance at the earliest opportunity, in order to avoid stifling opportunities for potential public/ private partnerships. 124 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies FY2023 Administration Response- This ordinance was completed and went through the codifying process in the fall of 2022. A final version has not reached the codifiers website yet but should be placed on the site soon. FY2021 - Decriminalization Review of City Code- It is the intent of the Council that an in-depth review be conducted of the City Code to consider items that could be de-criminalized. Council staff could work with Council Members and the City Attorney's Office to draft a scope and come back with a report on the timeline. FY 2023 Administration Response-Further response forthcoming. Prior Year's Response - The initial review of City code, which included a law student clerk and the Prosecutor's Office, revealed that more attention and expertise will be needed to complete this review, including involvement of the Prosecutor's Office. The project will be continued in the coming fiscal year. COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS (CAN) FY 2023- Free Fare in Winter Months- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to build on the success of Free Fare February in 2022, seeking partners to provide funding again next winter and extending it for three months. The Council would fund the City portion of the cost through a future budget amendment. FY 2023 Administration Response- The City is mostly in an advocacy role. The Mayor's office has been continuing conversations with UTA, regional, and State leaders. FY 2023- Expediting Traffic Calming Projects- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate the workflow among CAN and Public Services Divisions that delivers previously-funded traffic calming projects, identify any bottlenecks in the system, and return to the Council with suggestions for ways to address them. FY 2023 Administration Response- The Transportation Division is just beginning the process of working with the Engineering Division to implement the Livable Streets Program. Within the zone-based side of the Livable Streets Program,project complexity will determine the Engineering Division's involvement in design and construction. Simple projects that only involve off-the-shelf designs, will be managed by Transportation Division staff utilizing on-call city contractors. More complex projects will utilize Engineering Division staff to design and advertise projects for bidding and construction. Projects falling into the quick-build side of the Livable Streets program will utilize off-the-shelf designs with on-call city contractors to speedily install traffic calming devices/elements. The intent is that Engineering will not need to be involved in the quick-build program. Transportation and Engineering will work together to develop a metric by which a project is identified as off-the-shelf/ 125 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies quick-build vs. complex. Data and experience from the first calendar year of the program's operation will help Transportation and Engineering identify any bottlenecks in the system. FY 2023-Youth and Family Program Streamlining- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate whether to consolidate all City youth and family programs into the Youth & Family Division.The purpose would be to increase efficiency and propose options for future budget discussions.Additionally, the Council would like the Administration to evaluate the City's role in youth and family programming in relation to other community organizations to identify efficiencies and reduce duplication, factoring in overall community demand for those services. FY2023 Administration Response-Evaluate whether to consolidate all City youth and family programs into the Youth&Family Division,purpose is to increase efficiency and purpose options for future budget discussions) Some factors to consider: • YouthCity provides seamless out of school time programs for youth ages 6-18. Several factors distinguish YC programs from other City, nonprofit and school- based programs and services. • YouthCity is offered at a reduced cost to all City residents. This is possible based on our braided funding stream of general fund dollars,grants,foundation dollars, and parent fees while building upon existing City infrastructure in parks and the Sorenson Campus. • YouthCity is designed to support and augment school day learning using evidence-based curriculums.All programs undergo a rigorous assessment 4 times per year. • There are three additional youth programs offered by the Salt Lake City Police Department and a vocational program offered by the Salt Lake Fire Department. Each of the programs exist under the direction of staff who are experts in their field. What is the City's role in Youth and Family programs in relation to other community providers. • Since inception, YouthCity has actively partnered with other service groups and out of school time providers. In 2005, YouthCity, Salt Lake City School District, and the Utah State Department of Workforce Services jointly submitted and was awarded a Mott Foundation grant to establish the Utah Afterschool Network. UAN sets the standard for quality, staff training requirements and networking for providers locally, regionally, and statewide. All programs receiving federal and state funding participate in a quality out of school time evaluation. Youth and Family staff have maintained an active leadership role in UAN. The most recent 126 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies data indicates that there are 3 out of school time slots for every 5 youth needing support and or care. FY 2022-Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation - It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve Westside neighborhoods in late 2021,to other areas of the City. FY2023 Administration Response- This program has far exceeded expectations for usage in its first year. While we are pleased with the overwhelming success of the program, there has been some degradation in service as a result of its popularity. We recommend allowing another 1-3 years to figure out the proper funding/service levels for the current service area so that we have a better idea of what it would take to expand to other areas. Prior Year's Response- The Transportation Division uses ridership levels and cost- per-rider data as guides to potential expansion. Data from Phase 1 (service to Westside communities) will be available in the next year or two and will allow the Transportation Division to forecast the potential for expansion in these neighborhoods. FY 2021 -Transfer Housing Trust Fund Development Loans and Payments to RDA-The Council intends to transfer the Housing Trust Fund's housing development-loan-related balances and payments to be overseen by the RDA. During FY 2020, HAND and the RDA developed a detailed "housing framework"for consideration by the RDA Board and the Council.These bodies may wish to schedule time once the FY21 budget is complete to finalize this work, which may include changes to City ordinances and/or board policies. FY 2023 Administration Response- On May 3, 2022 in BA7, Council approved the transfer of the Housing Trust Fund's balance sheets and loans to the RDA. The physical and electronic loan files have been transferred to the RDA, and Housing Stability staff continue to work with the RDA and the Attorney's Office to ensure a smooth transition of the HTF loans, and prepare code modifications for the HTFAdvisory Board, Code 2.80. Prior Year's Response - The Housing Stability Division continues to administer these loans and assist the HTF Advisory Board. This year, the Finance Department will prepare a budget amendment to transfer the balance sheet of the loans, and coordinate with RDA for a corresponding budget amendment to accept the balance sheet. Once the loans are transferred, the Attorney's Office will prepare and review with the Council the needed code modifications related to restructuring the HTF Advisory Board. 127 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies FINANCE DEPARTMENT FY 2023-Tenant Ombudsman - It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to explore adding a tenant ombudsman in the Landlord/Tenant Program (also known as the Good Landlord Program)to serve the growing number of renters among City residents. The Council requests that the Administration return with a potential scope of work for one or more FTEs, keeping in mind services already provided by outside agencies to avoid duplication, and building on work done by the City's consumer financial protection analyst. FY2023 Administration Response- To serve the growing number of renters among City residents, the Landlord/Tenant Program utilizes various agencies to identify violations of tenant protections. Such services include disputes with their landlord over various issues including not returning the deposit, lease agreement issues, eviction process, terminating the lease, etc. Tenants are referred to Utah Legal Services and other various agencies. Other services and resources we currently refer City residents are: • Utah Legal Service-Income restricted • Disability Law Center • Housing Coalition • Pro-Bono Initiative • HUD Assistance- Offers Renter's Kit&Fair Housing Information • Utah Anti-Discrimination and Labor Division • Utah Bar Association • Utah State Courts-Renter's Rights • The Good Landlord, Tom Wood • Landlord-Tenant Mediation program through Utah Community Action • Tenant Legal Representation program through Utah Legal Services With the Landlord/Tenant program referrals above and the proposed scope of work for the Tenant Ombudsman(Consumer Protection Analyst FTE) under the Housing Stability Division the Administration believes that the services provided are wraparound services for the tenants of Salt Lake City. The Consumer Protection Analyst would work closely with community partners and the City's Landlord/Tenant team to identify violations of tenant protections and coordinate existing tenant education, mediation services, legal services, and eviction prevention resources. The Consumer Protection Analyst will develop methods and find venues to conduct community education and outreach to raise public awareness of the programs while identifying policy gaps in tenant protections. While this is the direction in which we feel the ombudsman position should potentially follow, we seek the advice of the Council on any additional work that they would like either the Landlord/Tenant or the Consumer Protection Analyst to undertake. 128 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies FY 2023-Covenants Education in the Landlord/Tenant Program - It is the intent of the Council that the Administration include training for property owners on Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions(CCRs) in the City's Landlord/Tenant Program. This training should clarify the differences between enforceable CCRs and unconstitutional CCRs, including those which would discriminate against a federally recognized protected class. The Council also requests that implicit bias training be added to the program's education materials. FY2023 Administration Response- The City's Landlord/Tenant program currently collaborates with The Good Landlord, which is owned and operated by Tom Wood. Tom has over 30 years of experience in the apartment industry. He has worked as a Regional Manager, Vice President, President and Owner of apartment portfolios of up to 5,000 apartments in seven Western States. Tom served as president of the Utah Apartment Association in 2010. The Good Landlord and the Utah Apartment Association are two separate entities that provide training-for landlords in Salt Lake City. Tom Wood has confirmed that his training program does include the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CCRs)in the City's Landlord/Tenant Program. Tom's current training also includes implicit biases such as race, age, and gender. If the Council desires, we can have Tom Wood provide a short demonstration of his training. FY 2023-Consolidated Fee Schedule Holistic Review- It is the intent of the Council to complete a holistic evaluation of the City's Consolidated Fee Schedule in conjunction with the Finance Department. This evaluation would include equity considerations and evaluate whether to increase, reduce, or in some cases eliminate, City fees. FY2023 Administration Response-Finance is ready and available to take any council recommendations for an evaluation of the CFS. Desired changes can potentially be submitted with the FY24 Budget. FY 2023-Grants and Ongoing Programs- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate the extent to which new City programs have been created through grants whose costs have continued beyond the life of the grant.The Council will use this information to inform a policy or system for evaluating when and whether it is appropriate for the City to create new programs with grants. FY2023 Administration Response- The Finance Department is working on a 5- year historical trend for Grants move into programs. Further detail regarding the approach the Finance Department will take, and the information gathered will be forthcoming. 129 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies FY 2022- Expanded Funding Our Future Definition - It is the intent of the Council that the definition of"public safety"for allocation of Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City's public safety alternative response model. (Note:The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.) FY 2023 Administration Response-Further response forthcoming. Prior Year's Response- The'public safety"allocations have been expanded to include social workers, park rangers, and MRT(Medical Response Team)crews. FIRE DEPARTMENT FY 2023- Fire Department Costs- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate: a. options for recouping costs for calls at the University of Utah. 1. FY 2023 Administration Response-Salt Lake City Fire Department responds to Fire and Medical calls on the University of Utah campus. As the university is tax-exempt, they are currently not paying for our services. They are owned by the State of Utah which would require action by the Utah State Legislature to allow a method of cost recuperation. The department maintains a strong working relationship with the university regarding fire/medical response, as well as fire prevention. b. the City's hazardous materials ordinance, and implementation of that ordinance,to assure that the City is reimbursed from private insurance payments to those responsible for an incident. 1. FY2023 Administration Response-SLCFD follows the current city ordinance which allows for cost recovery of negligent or otherwise purposeful acts requiring hazardous material response. The individual or entity responsible is invoiced the actual cost of responding to the incident. The last several years, the department has had a high success rate in collecting payment. Those payments are presented to council via budget amendment for informational purposes and it allows our department to replenish our specialty operations budget. c. continue evaluating options for electrified Fire vehicles. 1. FY 2023 Administration Response-Electrified fire vehicles are currently being evaluated by Fire and Fleet as potential options for future use. There are few electric fire truck/engine options on the market and it's important we select the suitable one for our response model. Fire and Fleet have collaborated with early electric fire vehicle adopters and are evaluating all available options. In 130 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies addition to the vehicle itself, careful consideration of the current infrastructure is required to ensure seamless and continual operations. It is anticipated that the electric fire vehicle will be successful in Salt Lake City. Fire is committed to our environment and it's a matter of when, not if, we acquire electrified heavy apparatus. MAYOR'S OFFICE FY 2023 - Evaluating Efficiencies across Diversified Response Teams- It is the intent of the Council to periodically evaluate the diversified response teams across the City to determine whether there are opportunities to eliminate redundancies and/ or gain new efficiencies. FY 2023 Administration Response-Response forthcoming a. The following programs would be included as part of the"diversified response model": i. Fire Department- Community Health Access Team (CHAT), Medical Response Team (MRT) ii. Police Department-Social Worker Co-Responders, Civilian Response Team iii. CAN (in partnership with other entities in some cases)- Downtown Ambassadors(including expanded areas), Homeless Engagement and Response Team (HEART), Code Enforcement iv. Public Lands- Park Rangers Program v. Public Services- Community Cleaning Program (CCP), Rapid Intervention Team vi. 911 Department- partnership with Mobile Crisis Outreach Team (MCOT) b. The Council would like the Administration to provide information in six months and in one year so that the Council can evaluate these programs: i. Clarify roles of each team and how a call for service is routed from one team to another. ii. Track as much data as possible to determine which indicators are most important for future reviews. These would include data such as: number of calls for service; number of diversions from a police-only response; response times for teams; changes in police response times;volume of calls by time of day and day of the week; referrals to other agencies; and other outputs and outcomes. iii. Find ways to provide this data with the Council and the public in a coordinated way. iv. Inform the public and other levels of government as these programs are rolled out. FY 2023- Importance of Plan Adoption - It is the intent of the Council that City departments and divisions rely only on plans that have been duly adopted by the iii Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies legislative body as the basis or building blocks for additional City policy or budget guidance. FY2023 Administration Response-Response forthcoming. POLICE DEPARTMENT FY 2021 - Police Department Role- It is the intent of the Council to re-evaluate the role the City asks the Police Department to play, and the budget to fulfill that role, and ask the Administration to evaluate moving certain programs out of the Police Department, like park rangers and social workers, and potentially add a function to the Human Resources Department to enhance the independence of the Internal Affairs unit. FY 2023 Administration Response: Social Workers- This years'response- Hiring processes are ongoing to fill vacant positions. The police department is looking into hiring part time social workers to help facilitate shift coverage on evenings and weekends using attrition savings from the vacant positions. Internal Affairs Unit- The Department hired a civilian director for the Internal Affairs Unit, which is now part of the Chiefs Office. The director works closely with the City's Human Resources Department, the independent Civilian Review Board, and the public. This director is not a sworn officer, which allows for increased objectivity, as well as for continuity and steady leadership since the position is not subject to rotating assignments. Police Civilian Response Team- Twelve PCRT(Police Community Response Team) positions and 1 supervisor were funded for 6 months in the FV 2023 budget process. The Police Department steering committee has worked to establish the job descriptions, recruitment process, and address the training needs for these positions. A hiring process was completed in December of 2022 and 10 qualified applicants will fill positions as of 11812023.An additional hiring process will be completed to hire the remaining 2 positions when the program is established, and time allows. The training program is anticipated to take 14 weeks to complete. The PCRT program will go into service when the equipment and training needs have been satisfied. Prior Year Responses: Social Workers-As hiring proceeds to fill the additional nine social worker positions authorized in the FY22 budget, covering evening and weekend shifts will become easier. Internal Affairs Unit- The Department hired a civilian director for the Internal Affairs Unit, which is now part of the Chiefs Office. The director works closely with the City's Human Resources Department, the independent Civilian Review Board, and the 132 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies public. This director is not a sworn officer, which allows for continuity and steady leadership since the position is not subject to rotating assignments. Police Civilian Response Team- The CRT is planned as a response to police-related calls for service that are categorized as low-hazard and non-emergency.A Police Department steering committee is working through the logistics of adding this program, like training,job and duty descriptions,policies and procedures. FY 2021 - Police Department Zero-based Budget Exercise- It is the intent of the Council to hire an independent auditor to evaluate each line item in the Police Department budget with the goal of conducting a zero-based budget exercise, which takes the budget apart and builds it back in a way that aligns with the policy goals of the Council, Mayor and public.A report back to the Council would happen in September, or sooner if possible. FY2023 Administration Response- The Police Department continues to participate in program-based budgeting which has facilitated budget reviews for programs beginning at a base level and evaluating current program needs, not just based on historical budgeting. The process is dynamic and continues to progress while the migration to the City's new Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP)is completed. Prior Year's Response-As a step toward zero-based budgeting, the Police Department participated in the Administration's initial efforts to undertake program- based budgeting during the formulation of the FY23 Mayor's Recommended Budget. This process cannot get fully underway until the migration to the City's new Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP)is complete. FY 2021 - Police Department Reporting Ordinance-The Council intends to work with the Attorney's Office to create an ordinance that establishes reporting requirements for internal information collected by and related to the Police Department. FY2023 Administration Response-Response forthcoming Prior Years Response-Response forthcoming. PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT FY 2023-Transition to Environmentally Sustainable Weed Control in Public Lands- It is the intent of the Council to request the Public Lands Department, including the Golf Division,transition to environmentally sustainable treatments for weeding and pest control in future years, acknowledging that this may require budget adjustments. This is consistent with an existing Sustainability Department policy. FY2023 Administration Response-See Attachment#1 133 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies FY 2022- Public Lands Maintenance- It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage. FY 2023 Administration Response-See Attachment#2 Prior Year's Response- The Public Lands Department is working on an estimate of funding needs, based on a complex framework that includes full staffing at appropriate wages, replacement of failing infrastructure, and unfunded responsibilities, including tasks like weed abatement and tree maintenance. FY 2022- Golf Fund Update- It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund. (Note:this item consolidates Legislative Intents from FY21, FY20, and FY19.) Golf Food and Beverage Options:A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses.To the extent that barriers exist in State law the Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority. FY 2023 Administration Response-In August of 2021, the contracted concessionaire for 5 of the 6 Salt Lake City golf courses ended their agreement with the City after 15 months of operations, citing financial losses. These losses came despite the Golf Division waiving their fees and all revenue sharing for the entirety of 2020 due to the pandemic disruption. • The Golf Division continued operations of the cafes at the five courses for the remainder of 2021. However, the courses were not able to offer beer sales, which make up most of the concessionaire's profits. The course cafes lost a significant amount of revenue while trying to still provide cafe services to golf patrons. • The Golf Division re-published the concessionaire RFP and contracted with a new concessionaire in early 2022 at five courses. The Golf Division cancelled the contract with the new concessionaire as of December 1, 2022 due to failure on the part of the concessionaire to make the contracted monthly payments. • In early November of 2022, the Golf Division requested that the Contracts Division re-publish the previous concessionaire RFP again so new proposals could be solicited during the winter months while the golf courses were closed. However, the Contracts Division denied the Golf Division's request to rush the re-publishing of the previous proposal. Because of this, it is uncertain when new contracts will be able to be negotiated at the five remaining golf courses without a 134 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies concessionaire agreement. Without a concessionaire contract in place, no alcohol sales can be permitted at the Bonneville, Forest Dale, Glendale, Nibley Park and Rose Park golf courses. The courses will provide basic bottled beverages, water and pre-prepared snacks until new concessionaire agreements can be secured. • The RFP for the Golf Division concessionaires is out on Bidsink. • The Golf Division will reduce the revenue sharing and fee structure for potential concessionaires to make operating a golf course caf6 more profitable. The Division has provided additional investments in terms of equipment flooring and paint into the cafe spaces to improve the appearance of the spaces to help attract new concessionaires. The two main obstacles to providing additional food and beverage services are: 1. Lack of interest from potential concessionaires due to lack of revenue potential, difficulty in hiring and retaining workers and providing needed upfront capital needed to begin the operations.Additionally, the cost of providing expanded alcohol offerings is significant above a standard beer permit required to sell beer at a recreation facility(golf course) and therefore concessionaires stick to selling only beer. 2. The State restriction to the City as an applicant for beer license. City Code 15.08.050 makes it unlawful for a person to consume beer in a City park, unless it is a park in which the City has expressly granted a concessionaire operating in the park a license to sell beer. The City's golf courses are parks"as defined in chapter 15.04. Prior Year's Response- This part of the Legislative Intent specifies that the Golf Division should review the specific open space zoning ordinances with the goal of removing barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. The Council also requested an analysis of any barriers that might exist in State law, and that changing these laws be identified as a future legislative priority. The Division's response included the following information: • In August of 2021, the contracted concessionaire for 5 of the 6 Salt Lake City golf courses ended their agreement with the City after 15 months of operations, citing financial losses. These losses came despite the Golf Division waiving their fees and all revenue sharing for the entirety of 2020 due to the pandemic disruption. • The Golf Division continued operations of the cafes at the five courses for the remainder of 2021. However, the courses were not able to offer beer sales, which make up most of the concessionaire's profits. The course cafes lost a significant amount of revenue while trying to still provide cafe services to golf patrons. 135 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies • City Code 15.08.050 makes it unlawful for a person to consume beer in a City park, unless it is a park in which the City has expressly granted a concessionaire operating in the park a license to sell beer. The City's golf courses are'parks"as defined in chapter 15.04. • The Golf Division has re-published the concessionaire RFP and hopes to contract with replacement concessionaires at the five locations for the 2022 season and beyond. However, absent new concessionaire contracts, the Golf Division will offer reduced services at the remaining courses. • The two main obstacles to providing additional food and beverage services are: 1. Lack of interest from potential concessionaires due to lack of revenue potential. 2. The State restriction to the City as an applicant for beer license. • The Golf Division has proposed reducing the fee structure for potential concessionaires to make operating a golf course cafe more profitable. It is also looking into areas of additional investment within the cafe spaces to help make the operations more attractive to both concessionaires and customers. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT FY 2015- Maintenance of Business Districts- It is the intent of the Council to hold a briefing regarding the costs of enhanced services provided to the Central Business District, in order to consider: a) revising how City services are provided and paid for, b) services that may be offered to other established or developing Business Districts in the City, and c) maintenance of amenity upgrades(such as lighting and benches). It is also the intent of the Council that this discussion happen in time to incorporate any changes into the renewal of the Central Business District agreement and Sugar House Business District. FY2023 Administration Response- The topic of funding enhanced services in business districts has been an ongoing discussion for many years. The current funding for Facilities'CBD and SBD maintenance is provided by the general fund and covers a variety of maintenance items at a basic level of service. Funding for the maintenance of Regent Street improvements is still being subsidized by the RDA and has not been absorbed by the general fund. Additional amenities that have been added over time have increased costs,yet operational budget has not reflected an increase other than inflationary. Currently, the Public Services Department does not have any mechanisms in place that allow for funding of any additional services from sources outside the general fund. We do respond to demand and new requests, as they are added through increased budget asks, but no additional expansion of programs are in place at this time. 136 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies The Central Business Improvement Assessment Area Management Agreement was renewed this year with Downtown Alliance and the Department of Economic Development and it does not cover CBD maintenance. The SBD has no agreements in place or an officially defined area. Prior Year's Response-Several years ago, Public Services reported having had productive discussions with RDA staff about various models to fund maintenance. Discussions focused on Central 9th and Regent Streets and included considering how parking can support business district maintenance. Nothing further has been reported since. PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FY 2023-Water Usage by the City- It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate water usage by the City and make recommendations for water conservation.This includes evaluation of water savings opportunities for CIP projects. FY 2023 Administration Response-Any tracking done within the City is done at the Public Lands and Public Services department level. The responses from these departments are included below: Public Services- The Facilities Division has implemented several water reduction strategies over the years when and where possible. The Facilities Division has reduced water consumption over the last several years.Any new capital projects are always reviewed for best practices in water efficiency and energy usage. Public Lands- FY 2023-Water Usage by the City It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate water usage by the City and make recommendations for water conservation. This includes evaluation of water savings opportunities for CIP projects. Salt Lake City Parks Division- Water Management Currently the Parks Division manages water usage based on monthly water bills provided by Public Utilities for each park district. On some irrigation systems water flow sensors are installed to measure GPM to determine if there are leaks and to shut off valves if necessary. Currently, the department's only means to track water savings is to adjust watering schedules and then review the monthly water billings. Irrigation systems are a growing asset category that will continue to present significant challenges to Public Lands in the face of continual drought. Many of our Public Lands irrigation systems were designed decades ago and provide overhead irrigation water to the City's Parks. During drought conditions, Public Lands are required to reduce watering, and this presents a significant threat to our existing urban forest. Without regular water during the summer months trees within the park 137 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies system are at risk of suffering and eventual death. The establishment of root watering systems that waters trees directly while being able to reduce overhead watering is standard practice for all new project implementation, but old irrigation systems must eventually be modified or replaced. In the final update, the Department will provide an update of recent water management systems installed to conserve and reduce water usage as well as funded and unfunded opportunities for water conservation.A future asset management plan will provide accurate cost estimates for replacing old irrigation systems within the public lands inventory. Salt Lake City Golf Division- Water Management The Golf Division manages water usage in two ways: 1. Daily water usage as applied on the courses utilizing software tied to flow meters as used by different zones and expressed as gallons used. This data allows the course superintendent to adjust usage based on weather conditions, turf needs, evapotranspiration data collected via a weather station located at the course, soil moisture levels and other considerations. 2. Monthly water usage based on billings and usage data from Public Utilities managed flow meters to each property and expressed as units per 100 cubic feet of water. The Golf Division's water budget is set based on the data correlated with the Public Utilities monthly billings, which are typically delayed by 2 to 3 months. The Golf Division also considers water usage on a 5-year average when setting water usage targets and budgets. Capital improvements can have a drastic impact on how a golf course looks and plays and how it competes in the market. The most important asset on a course to bringing in more players is the playing surface, the fairways, approaches, tees, and the greens. Food, beverage, and retail sales can also boost revenue, but without healthy and properly conditioned greens, the players won't be at the course to spend the extra dollars on conveniences. First and foremost, the turf on every course needs a functioning and efficient irrigation system that can keep the greens,green. In addition, utilizing sophisticated on-site weather stations, improving irrigation uniformity, and using state-of-the-art computerized control systems all can create considerable savings of water and energy resources as well as improving the overall health and sustainability of the turf. Public Lands will provide additional information in future updates on past water conservation activities and future opportunities to improve irrigation systems. A preliminary estimate of systems and funding needs are outlined in the FY2022 Public Lands Maintenance legislative intent response. 138 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) FY 2023- New Programs and Capital Accounts Review- It is the intent of the RDA Board in future budget years to consolidate the budgeting and policy development steps for new programs so that funding is allocated once the Board has had the opportunity to get a full understanding of the proposal and to exercise their policy making discretion. It is further the intent of the Council to review by December 2022 all RDA accounts that contain balances to determine whether the appropriations still align with the goals of the Board. FY 2023 Administration Response-Staff will endeavor to prioritize policy development prior to the allocation of funds for new programs. The request for providing account balance information requested in this Legislative Intent is currently being undertaken as part of the preparation for the implementation of the new ERP system FY 2023- Prioritize Equity and Variety of Professional Opportunities - It is the intent of the RDA Board to continue to collaborate with the Administration and prioritize equity and inclusion in the Board's policy, oversight, and budget decisions. In doing so, the Board intends to request options from the City Administration and RDA staff that maximize opportunities for meaningful involvement for a wide array of developers and professionals. Further, it is the intent of the Board to authorize funding for projects that support walkability and are built at a scale to encourage human interaction and include architectural interest and variety. FY2023 Administration Response- This intent is understood by the Administration and is in line with the Equitable and Inclusive Development Work Plan, which outlines the RDA's equitable and inclusive developmentgoals as well as action items for staff to support these efforts. The goal of the plan is to acknowledge the racial and social inequities that have historically existed within the redevelopment industries, ensure that DEI strategies are utilized in RDA funded projects, and enhance the ability of non-traditional applicants to apply for Agency programs and offerings. Goals to this effect can be added to the Work Plan and implemented when possible. In December 2021, the Board approved the RDA Guiding Framework which includes the Agency's Mission Statement and Core Values. Neighborhood Vibrancy is one of these three values and incorporates Wolkability as one of the Livability Benchmarks, with the stated intent to promote walkable neighborhoods and connectivity, and support a safe, engaging pedestrian experience." These benchmarks are utilized within the prioritization and recommendations for Agency funding and participation within projects. FY 2022-Structure of Accounts within RDA and All Other Departments, including Fund Balances and Previous Capital Projects- It is the intent of the Council/Board to review the full structure of RDA accounts with RDA and Finance 139 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Financial Policies Staff, including fund balances and capital projects funded in previous years.The Board may wish to discuss with the RDA and Finance staff the best way to get this information on a real-time basis. Staff note:The City's Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP) effort will help in tracking/providing this information in a less labor- intensive way, although the horizon for full implementation could be a year or longer. Prior Year's Response- The efforts requested in this Legislative Intent are being undertaken as part of the preparation for the implementation of the new ERP system. SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT FY 2023-Sustainability Holding Account- It is the intent of the Council to allocate the following items in the Sustainability Department to a holding account pending further discussion with the Council.The Council supports these items, but policy guidance from the Council is needed, and extends to the overall role that the City's Sustainability Department should play in the community. a. $214,000 for EV Charging Stations, b. $300,000 for electrified transportation planning, and c. $125,000 food equity funding request. FY2023 Administration Response- The Sustainability Department discussed the holding accounts and intended use of the funds with the City Council in work sessions held September through November 2022. The Council has approved releasing the funds for expenditure and the Department is in process of establishing agreements and launching projects. COUNCIL-LED INTENTS FY 2023-CAN/RDA/DED Role Clarity- It is the intent of the Council to further clarify the roles of Community and Neighborhoods, the Redevelopment Agency and the Department of Economic Development as they relate to housing and commercial development and assistance. FY 2023- Rotating Outside Auditing of Each City Department- It is the intent of the City Council to re-establish its practice of conducting management and performance audits of City departments, divisions, and functions on a rotating basis in the coming years. These audits are in addition to the financial audit that the City Council oversees annually.The audits are intended to bring consultants in for an independent look at existing City services to identify opportunities for improved efficiencies. In addition to a focus on identifying potential efficiencies, the Council intends to ask the auditors to identify or evaluate professional best practices, definitions of success for each program, metrics associated with key functions, and any duplication that exists with other City departments and/or other levels of government.The Council intends for the audits to inform evaluations of how City services are meeting residents' needs while being fiscally responsible with the taxpayer dollars. 140 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Capl* tal Improy,lemen Program r- - I MM s l � _ A' - ` � •\ [-dry ' - ; ' r " This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program CapitalImprovement Program INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Salt Lake City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed to replace or expand the City's public infrastructure. The principal element that guides the City in determining the annual infrastructure improvements and budgets schedule is the current fiscal year capital budget. The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development& Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents from each district.The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety of criteria and provides funding recommendations to the Mayor. The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares its funding recommendations for the City Council as part of the Annual Recommended Budget.The City Council reviews the recommendations of the Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects before allocating funding and adopting the final CIP budget.The details of the recommended FY2023-24 CIP Budget are included in this book. In considering major capital projects,the City looks at the potential operating impact of each project. New capital improvements often entail ongoing expenses for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition, the repair and maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the new infrastructure. Conversely, a positive contribution, such as a reduction in ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into the decision- making process. Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or operations expenses, where the departments have included projections of any increases to future operating costs. The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress.All projects older than three years that do not show significant progress are then considered for recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready projects.The Administration continuously evaluates the City's funding of its Capital Improvement Program. Because the proceeds from debt financing are considered a source for funding the City's capital improvement projects,the City analyzes the effect that issuance of additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current debt ratio. 143 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City Resolution No.29 of 2017/Salt Lake City Council Capital and Debt Management Policies Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify the expectations of the City's Capital Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in determining how to best address the City's deferred and long-term maintenance needs. Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include: • A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more years and cannot have a recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not include maintenance expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches. • A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of$50,000 or more, with few exceptions. • Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investments and minimize maintenance and replacement costs. • Priorities are given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in the preservation of the community's prior investment. • The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget amendment of each year if an existing balance remains on a completed project. • Debt Service (excluding G.O. Bonding). FY2023-24 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ALLOCATIONS Salt Lake City's FY2023-24 adopted CIP budget appropriates $545,012,942 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Class"C" Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent Tax Funds, Redevelopment Agency Funds, Enterprise Funds, and other public and private funds. The City's General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a payment from the City CIP contribution, except for the Eccles Theater project.The Library Fund covers the Local Building Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt associated with the construction of two fire stations is funded through CIP. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds are funded through the City's Class C Road fund. Funds to pay debt service, totaling $11,482,326, are included in the adopted annual budget. 144 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City's capital improvement projects. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds funded the reconstruction of Class C roads throughout the City. A total of$10,274,000 was recommended for Transportation projects. Of this amount,the budget appropriates $1,194,000 of General Funds, $240,000 of Impact Fee funds, $2,090,000 of Funding our Future funds, and $6,750,000 in Cent Tax funding. Programs funded include Safer Crossings, Sidewalk Improvements, Frequent Transit Routes, Complete Streets, Livable Streets, Neighborhood Byways, Urban Trails,Traffic Circle Construction, and Traffic Signal Replacement. The recommended budget for Parks,Trails, and Open Space capital improvement projects includes a total appropriation of$4,221,000 from the General Fund and Parks Impact Fee funds. Projects funded include Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning, Park Development and Improvements, Bilingual Signage Installation, and Park Restoration and Conservation. Public Services capital improvement recommended budget includes a total appropriation of$10,348,771. Of this amount,the budget appropriates $4,598,771 from the General Fund, $3,500,000 of Class C funding, $1,000,000 of Funding our Future funds, $750,000 in Cent Tax funding, and $500,000 of CIP funding. Programs funded include Public Way Concrete, Complete Streets Reconstruction and Overlay,Alleyway Improvements, Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot, and the Facilities Asset Renewal Plan.An apparatus bay extension project was also funded for Fire Station #1. A total of$150,000 was also recommended for a Westside Art Project from Funding our Future funds. Capital Projects The CIP pages include details for each recommended project for the FY2023-24 Budget.These pages provide a breakout of the funding recommendations and future costs associated with each project.The total for capital projects in the FY2023-24 budget is $24,993,771. ENTERPRISE FUND PROJECTS The City's enterprise functions;Airport,Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Redevelopment, Refuse Collection and Golf-are by nature,very capital intensive. The budgets for these activities reflect the need to maintain the integrity and capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality. Airport Fund -The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City's system of airports. The Department of Airports(the Airport) has 639 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, 145 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience. The Fiscal Year 2024 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures.The Salt Lake City International Airport(SLCIA) continues to benefit from the American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA) as well as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law(BIL)grants awarded for FY2024. The Airport will use the remaining funds in the ARPA grants which will help offset operating and maintenance expenses that will lower the landing fee and terminal rents charged in FY24 as well as make up for lost revenues. The BIL grants will continue to provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital infrastructure projects that are moving from design into actual construction.The Airport will be bringing on 22 gates located on South Concourse East(SCE) in October 2024 which brings additional staffing and maintenance staff requirements while seeing a significant reduction in the hardstand operations. The developed FY24 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects.These projects include the Terminal Redevelopment Program (TRIP)and the North Concourse Program (NCP), which together are called the New SLC. In addition, critical projects found in the airfield,terminal, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport's owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years. Public Utilities Funds-Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities,water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund.Tax money is not used to fund these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally a grant or state/federal government subsidized loan. The department is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act(WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been established for each fund.The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are infrastructure intensive and administration of these assets requires long term project and financial planning. The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In fiscal year 2024,the department has over 95 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects. Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common for projects to be designed in one year and constructed in subsequent years.The budget includes projects rated as a high priority in the Department's Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken 146 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water treatment plants were built in the 1950's and early 60's. Planning is underway for each of the three plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement.A unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity are water rights and exchange agreement obligations. RDA Funds-The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City(RDA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities.The RDA utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the City's housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability.The RDA's primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account. The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure projects.As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year funding.The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific project costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City's CIP schedule or requirements for approval. The RDA fiscal year 2024 budget process proposes one potential City infrastructure project.The City Creek daylighting design plan explores bringing a portion of City Creek that currently runs in a culvert underground up to the surface just north of the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. The project goals include increasing access to nature, improving water quality and mitigating surface flooding. This funding request will produce 40% construction drawings which will be used for project implementation. Landscaping improvements and other pedestrian amenities will also be recommended as a part of the design plan to activate the trail and create a welcoming centerpiece for the westside community.The total cost for implementation is estimated to be between $15,000,000 and $20,000,000. Sustainability Fund -Sustainability operations enable continuing compliance with federal, state, and local regulations related to landfill gas collection, closing portions of the landfill, and constructing a new landfill cell within the permitted footprint included in the master plan. Sustainability proposed no projects for FY 2023-24. Golf Fund-The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price 147 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. Over the past several years, expenses have outpaced revenues and have limited Golfs ability to self-fund most if not all non- emergency Capital Projects. In 2012, a Golf CIP Fund was established that allocates $1 per every 9 holes played and 9%from all annual pass sales toward building funds that can be used exclusively for Capital Projects. Until FY 2019, these funds had not been released for use as the fund balance was needed to provide a fund balance offset against a fund deficit.As part of the FY22 budget proposal,the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played, beginning in January 2022, in order to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue projects. The Golf Division has budgeted $6,610,220 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY24.The Golf Division is undertaking a four-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box areas at each course and have allocated $60,000 in FY24 from the Golf CIP Fund.The Golf Division is undertaking a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts paths and has allocated $525,000 for FY24. Other significant projects include new parking lot resurfacing at the Mountain Dell and driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf course. As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using$424,263 in FY24 to purchase additional equipment. 148 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City General Fund/Class C/ Impact Fee/ Enterprise Fund/Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2024 PROJECTIMPACT 1/4C SALES • OTHER TOTAL Debt Service Projects Sales Tax Series $ 362,950 $ 362,950 2013B Bond Sales Tax Series $ 747,025 $ 747,025 2014B Bond Sales Tax Series $ 2,003,973 $ 2,003,973 2016A Bond w Sales Tax Series $ 358,575 $ 358,575 2019A Bond Sales Tax Series $ 1,999,625 $ 1,999,625 H 2O22B Bond -Q Sales Tax Series $ 3,088,875 $ 3,088,875 p 2022C Bond B&C Roads $ 979,503 $ 979,503 Series 2014 ESCO Debt $ 761,000 $ 761,000 Service to Bond Fire Station#3 $ 679,400 $ 679,400 Fire Station#14 $ 501,400 $ 501,400 Debt Service $ 10,301,526 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,180,800 $11,482,326 Projects Total Ongoing Projects Crime Lab $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Facilities $ 350,000 $ 350,000 c Maintenance to Trail Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 200,000 c p Public Lands $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Maintenance Ongoing Projects $ 1,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 1,400,000 Total Other Ongoing Community and $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Neighborhoods- Surplus Land RES C Public Services- $ 150,000 $ 150,000 c Smiths Ballfield Public Services $ 150,500 $ 150,500 s ESCO County Steiner O Public Services- $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Memorial House Other Ongoing $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 350,500 $ 1,050,500 149 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City General Fund/Class C/ Impact Fee/ Enterprise Fund/Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2024 PROJECTIMPACT 1/4C SALES • OTHER TOTAL New/ Maintenance Projects Total Library Plaza $ 190,000 $ 190,000 Structural Assessment and Visioning Safer Crossings: $ 270,000 $ 90,000 $ 540,000 $ 900,000 Main St., Glendale Park,and Citywide 200 East ADA and $ 234,000 $ 234,000 Sidewalk Improvements Transit Capital for $ 990,000 $ 110,000 $ 1,100,000 Frequent Transit Routes/ Operational Investments Complete Streets $ 3,293,000 $ 3,293,000 Program:2100 a South,Virginia St., u and Citywide Public Way $ 750,000 $ 750,000 a) Concrete Z 2023/2024 Livable Streets $ 250,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,350,000 Implementation Neighborhood $ 440,000 $ 360,000 $ 800,000 Byways Complete Streets $ 2,250,000 $2,250,000 $ 4,500,000 Reconstruction 2023/2024 Poplar Grove Park $ 253,500 $ 253,500 $ 507,000 Full Court Basketball Expansion Cottonwood Park $ 202,000 $ 648,000 $ 850,000 Trailhead and Parklet Complete Streets $ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000 Overlay 2023/2024 Urban Trails:The $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 Other Side Village &the 9-Line Trail 150 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City General Fund/Class C/ Impact Fee/ Enterprise Fund/Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2024 PROJECTIMPACT 1/4C SALES • OTHER TOTAL Fire Station No.7 $ 438,850 $ 416,150 $ 855,000 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 337 Park $ 550,000 $ 550,000 Development Jefferson Park $ 530,000 $ 530,000 Improvements Parks Bilingual $ 82,800 $ 331,200 $ 414,000 Signage Installation Fairpark Traffic $ 497,000 $ 497,000 Circle Construction Phase Alleyway $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Improvements 2023/2024 0 0 Fire Station#1 $ 648,771 $ 500,000 $ 1,148,771 u Apparatus Bay a Extension Facilities Asset $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 Renewal Plan Z FY24 Mill and Overlay $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Maintenance Pilot Program Historic $ 325,000 $ 325,000 Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at International Peace Gardens 75-Year-Old $ 40,000 $ 360,000 $ 400,000 Traffic Signal Replacement Westside Art $ 150,000 $ 150,000 New Projects $ 7,284,921 $3,240,000 $3,500,000 $2,968,850 $7,500,000 $ 500,000 $24,993,771 Total Cost Overrun $ 22,214 $ 225,357 $ 247,571 Percent for Art $ 161,518 $ 161,518 Total General $ 19,508,661 $3,626,875 $3,500,000 $2,968,850 $7,700,000 $ 2,031,300 $39,335,686 Fund/Other Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/Surplus Land Fund CIP Projects 151 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City General Fund/Class C/ Impact Fee/ Enterprise Fund/Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2024 IMPACT 1/4C SALES FOF CLASS C FEES TAX OTHER TOTAL city Infrastructure 0 Projects(CIP 00 No Projects C u Total CDBG $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $Other — Programs Airport CIP Projects CUP Crossover $ 505,000 $ 505,000 Piping Decommission R/ $ 405,000 $ 405,000 W 14-32&T/W Improvements (Design) Replace Pumps in $ 967,000 $ 967,000 Glycol Pumps Stations Taxiway F $ 9,400,000 $ 9,400,000 Reconstruction(G - F1)- (Construction) Taxiway U &V $ 4,725,000 $ 4,725,000 Proper(Design) Taxiway U &V $ 78,651,000 $78,651,000 Tunnel &Roadway Realignment UPS Pump Station $ 1,483,000 $ 1,483,000 0 Replacement Demo Row 21 - $ 1,613,000 $ 1,613,000 Q Apron&Taxiway Reconstruction SVRA Hangar Site $ 2,721,000 $ 2,721,000 Development- Phase I TVY Water& $ 9,046,000 $ 9,046,000 Sewer Improvements Electrical Vehicle $ 1,068,000 $ 1,068,000 Charging Stations FY24 S Employee $ 1,559,000 $ 1,559,000 Parking Lot Development Program/Surplus Canal Relocation (Design) S Employee $ 60,808,000 $60,808,000 Parking Lot Development Program/Surplus Canal Relocation (Construction) 152 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City General Fund/Class C/ Impact Fee/ Enterprise Fund/Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2024 PROJECTIMPACT 1/4C SALES • OTHER AOC Backup $ 311,000 $ 311,000 Generator Demo FAA FMP $ 1,044,000 $ 1,044,000 and Construct Z; New Roadway 0 0 NS1 &NS4 Switch $ 1,063,000 $ 1,063,000 u Gear&Capacitor i NWS $ 624,000 $ 624,000 oQ Replacement Controls Q Total Airport CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $175,993,000 $175,993,000 Projects Golf CIP Projects Tee Box Leveling $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Pump $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Replacement Maintenance $ 424,263 $ 424,263 Equipment Parking Lot $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Resurfacing w c Property Fencing $ 55,220 $ 55,220 c9 Project New Construction $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000 Projects Irrigation $ 4,400,000 $ 4,400,000 Improvements Cart Path $ 525,000 $ 525,000 Improvements Total Golf CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 7,034,483 $ 7,034,483 Projects Public Utilities CIP Projects Water Main $14,620,000 $14,620,000 Replacements Treatment Plant $38,340,000 $38,340,000 Improvements Deep Pump Wells $100,000 $100,000 %A Meter Change- $2,500,000 $2,500,000 v Out Program �= Water Service $3,450,000 $3,450,000 Connections u Storage $6,690,000 $6,690,000 B Reservoirs aL Pumping Plants& $900,000 $900,000 Pump Houses Culverts, Flumes $4,200,000 $4,200,000 &Bridges Distribution $2,300,000 $2,300,000 Reservoirs(Tanks) Maintenance& $400,000 $400,000 Repair Shops (Water Utility) 153 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program Salt Lake City General Fund/Class C/ Impact Fee/ Enterprise Fund/Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2024 IMPACT 1/4C SALES PROJECT GF GF FOFOTHER TOTAL Treatment Plants $ 212,259,773 $ 212,259,773 Collection Lines $ 23,955,000 $23,955,000 Lift Stations $ 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000 'aaa Maintenance& $ 350,000 $ 350,000 Repair Shops c (Sewer Utility) c Storm Drain Lines $ 6,230,000 $ 6,230,000 0 Riparian Corridor $ 250,000 $ 250,000 v, Improvements v Landscaping $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Z Storm Water Lift $ 650,000 $ 650,000 u Stations Detention Basins $ 365,000 $ 365,000 a Street Lighting $ 2,240,000 $ 2,240,000 Projects Total Public $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 322,599,773 $ 322,599,773 Utilities CIP Projects Redevelopment Agency(RDA)CIP Projects p City Creek $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Daylighting Total RDA CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Projects Sustainability CIP Projects No Projects $ — n Total $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — N Sustainability CIP Projects Total Enterprise and Other Fund $505,677,256 $505,677,256 CIP GRAND TOTAL $19,508,661 $3,626,875 $3,500,000 $2,968,850 $7,700,000 $ 507,708,556 $ 545,012,942 154 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 iiilll ter.,... ■�n• ■ •u 1111111 uuunll � 1111111 1111 II II II Fil 1111111 uuuuu u 1111111 �} Illlrn 11 1111111 1111111/11111 InNu li 1 ' �• ■• IIINu 11 1111111 t rx, „ ■■ p lln�n li • u•tllllll utl_ ee'ruru N rwl UuAu ll ...111 yy (1�e t• w l r e1 n n nl�n a gas on 111 q, I' ISi e•i ul ■■ a nn u n • i i � ri rsl r r� �� n n , iin�u b � m 1 ■� �� •• •■ 11 lulu u t • � � � r r ■■ •■ un�u 1 p ■ lulr u L /i • nu liall rall • nub � `'ii.q'. Y„ ♦i�;�;'J ',�' ' i to 1 .� �" �,�%�� !dIS /';�It' I t �� �C t t � . 1' y 1 a 'a +� �w►y • 1f t / I`I've 7 , h 1 1� a (IF t "Y7711t L t. This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Office of the City Council OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 000 OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL i. Victoria Petro (Vice Chair) 2. Alejandro Puy 3. Chris Wharton 4. Ana Valdemoros 5. Darin Mano (Chair) 6. Dan Dugan 7. Amy Fowler Community Relations Communications COUNCIL STAFF Budget Analysis Cindy Gust-Jenson Policy Analysis Community Development Executive Director Intergovernmental Coordination Legislative Oversight Legislative Audit 157 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Council OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 3,642,049 4,771,166 4,977,720 O&M 15,700 58,800 58,800 Charges&Services 635,759 905,841 921,729 Capital Expenditures 13,129 2,000 2,000 Total Office of the City Council 4,306,637 5,737,807 5,960,249 DIVISION BUDGETS Community Affairs 4,159,816 5,387,707 5,610,149 36.00 Legislative Non-Departmental 146,821 350,100 350,100 Total Office of the City Council 4,306,637 5,737,807 5,960,249 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 4,306,637 5,737,807 5,960,249 Total Office of the City Council 4,306,637 5,737,807 5,960,249 FTE by Fiscal Year 35.00 36.00 36.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures 2,000 Charges&Services 921,729 O&M 58,800 Personal Services 4,977,720 158 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Council OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base to Base Changes (336,058) Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Pension Changes (17,998) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 8,940 This increase reflects the cost of insurance for the City Council as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Salary Proposal 171,889 This increase reflects the City Council Office portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 45,669 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. Policy Issues Council Office Adjustments 350,000 The budget includes funding as a placeholder for Council Office funding initiatives. 159 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 16o Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 o�o 0 0 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR ASSISTANT Erin Mendenhall I Mayor Tina Nee Department Leadership CHIEF ADMIN OFFICE MANAGER OFFICER ....................................... CHIEF OF STAFF ............................ Tracy Pattillo Lisa Shaffer Rachel Otto Admin Assistants EXECUTIVE DEPUTY CHIEF DEPUTY CHIEF ........ ASSISTANT ADMIN OFFICER OF STAFF April Patterson Megan Yuill Lindsey Nikola .10 EXECUTIVE CHIEF EQUITY DIRECTOR OF ASSISTANT OFFICER ...... COMMUNITY Alejandro Sanchez Damian Choi OUTREACH Weston Clark ADA Coordinator Community Liaisons Policy Advisor Special Projects and Equity Manager Equity Coordinator Equity Coordinator for Special Projects DIRECTOR OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS ....... ....... HOMELESS POLICY Andrew Wittenberg AND OUTREACH Andrew Johnston Comms. Manager Content Coordinator EDUCATION SENIOR ADVISOR Jennifer Newell 161 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Erin Mendenhall,Mayor of Salt Lake City FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 3,311,790 5,055,866 5,238,468 O&M 48,675 84,703 112,953 Charges&Services 766,598 1,424,382 1,443,146 Capital Expenditures 10,790 60,500 25,500 Total Office of the Mayor 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 DIVISION BUDGETS Community Affairs 92,770 1,023,918 1,293,505 12.00 Executive Staff 4,045,083 5,601,533 5,526,562 22.00 Total Office of the Mayor 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 34.00 Total Office of the Mayor 4,137,853 6,625,451 6,820,067 FTE by Fiscal Year 30.00 32.00 34.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures 25,500 Personal Services Charges &Services 5,238,468 1,443,146 O & M 112,953 162 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes (244,126) Base-to-Base changes compare personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Pension Changes (26,434) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 10,156 This increase reflects the City Council's insurance cost as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Salary Proposal 195,424 This increase reflects the Mayor's Office portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 36,606 Annualized funding for those positions was added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 62,538 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 7,576 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Remove Art Under the Bypass(One-time) (60,000) The budget removes funding included in FY 2023 for maintenance of an art installation from a number of years back that the City agreed to maintain. Stipends for Boards and Commissions 29,420 The budget includes additional funding for boards and commissions stipends. Remove Fleet Block Engagement(One-time) (100,000) Funding provided in fiscal year 2023 to secure an outside expert to advise the City on the Fleet Block development process. This funding is now being removed. 163 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor FY 2023 BA#3:Transferring Consumer Protection Analyst from Mayor's Office (108,841) Budget amendment#3 of FY 2023 moved the Consumer Protection Analyst position funding and FTE from the Mayor's Office to Housing Stability. Policy Issues Love Your Block Program (Grade 23)(10 Mths) 160,667 The Mayor is recommending additional funding for and the addition of 2.0 FTEs for the Love Your Block Program. This program mobilizes community members to volunteer to make improvements to their communities with mini-grant awards and leveraging other funding sources. This expansion will allow the program to reach beyond the west side neighborhood into Ballpark, Central City, and Marmalade areas. Know Your Neighbor(Grade 23)(10 Mths) 92,000 The budget includes additional funding for and the addition of 1.0 FTE for the Know Your Neighbor Program.This funding will transition a grant-funded part-time position into a full- time position. Office Reconfiguration 25,000 Funding is included for office reconfiguration to accommodate new employees and to optimize space in the Mayor's office. Professional Association Membership Fees 20,000 The budget includes funding for additional professional association membership fees. Travel 59,630 The budget includes additional funding to allow for increasing Mayor's office travel costs. SLC Corps Operating Expenses 15,000 Funding is included for the increased cost of office materials and supplies, printing and promotion,food and refreshments, equipment and tools, and various dues and publications. Operating Cost 20,000 The budget includes funding to various increased operating costs within the Mayor's office. 164 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Airports DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 00 CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE CHIEF OPERATING ............••••• Megan DePaulis OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR Dave Quealy Pete Higgins William W. Wyatt Legal Counsel Executive Director of Airports Budget Development Legal Services Accounting& Reporting Contractual Agreement Reviews Auditing Rates and Charges FINANCE AND Passenger Facility Charges ACCOUNTING Airfield&Terminal Operations Financial Forecasting Brian Butler OPERATIONS Aircraft Rescue& Fire Fighting Airport Statistics Director/Chief ...... """ Treber Anderson Airport Shuttle& Landside Ops Grant Acquisition Financial Officer Director Emergency&Safety Programs Bond Management Control Center&Security Mgmt Property Management Facility Maintenance COMMERCIAL Airfield, Roads&Grounds Land Acquisitions SERVICES MAINTENANCE Maintenance Contracts Development ....;...... Ed Clayson Risk Management Shane Andreasen Director Electrical Maintenance Commercial Services Director Fleet Maintenance Deicing Plant Management Capital Planning& PLANNING AND DESIGN AND Engineering&Architect. Svcs Programming ENV. PROG. CONSTRUCTION Project Planning and Dev. ...... •••••• MANAGEMENT Construction Administration Environmental Programs Brady Fredrickson DBE Programs Director Melyssa Trnayskis GIS and Mapping Director Design and Inspection Information INFO.TECH. PUBLIC RELATIONS Public Relations Programs Technology Support SERVICES AND MARKETING Media Response Telecommunications •••••• •••••• Technical Systems Edwin Cherry Nancy Volmer Air Service Development Maintenance Director Director Marketing OPERATIONAL READINESS&TRANSITION Medardo Gomez Director 165 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Airports Department of Airports AIRPORT OVERVIEW The Salt Lake City Department of Airports manages Salt Lake City International Airport(the Airport),Tooele Valley Airport, and South Valley Regional Airport. The Airport serves a multi-state region and consists of three air carrier runways and a general aviation runway and is classified as a large hub airport.The Airport's extensive route network served over 25.5 million passengers in FY2022. Enplaned passengers are estimated to increase by approximately 1.4%from the FY2023 budget of 13.9 million enplanements to 14.1 million enplanements for FY2024. In September of 2020, the Airport opened portions of phase one of the new airport, which included a new terminal, the gateway center, concourse A west and a new parking garage.A portion of concourse B west was opened in October of 2020. By the end of April of 2021, the old Airport facilities were completely demolished to make way for phase two of the new airport. In May of 2023, Concourse A east will be completed with 5 gates opening and the remaining 17 gates opening in October 2023. In addition, the Central Tunnel and 5 gates on Concourse B east will be complete by the Fall of 2024, and 4 more gates in the Fall of 2025. Tooele Valley Airport is a general aviation reliever airport to the Airport. It has one runway and support services are on-demand only. South Valley Regional Airport is also a general aviation reliever airport. It also has one runway and is a base for a Utah National Guard military helicopter unit. The Department of Airports is an Enterprise Fund. It is not supported by property taxes, General Funds of local governments or special district taxes. Capital funding requirements for FY2024 are met from earnings, passenger facility charges, customer facility charges,general airport revenue bonds (GARBS), Federal Aviation Administration grants under the Airport Improvement Program, and State grants. MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT The mission of the Salt Lake City Department of Airports is to develop and manage a system of airports, owned by Salt Lake City,which provides quality transportation facilities and services to optimize convenience, safety, and efficiency for aviation customers.The vision is to achieve excellence and unprecedented customer service in making Salt Lake City among the most convenient and efficient air transportation centers in the world. 166 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Airports DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Department Performance Measurements Measure 2020 Actual 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Target 2024 Target Pass the Transportation Security Administration's Passed Passed Passed Pass Pass annual security inspection, TSR 1542 Security Regulations Pass the annual certification Passed Passed Passed Pass Pass by the FAA per Regulation 139 Maintain airfield runway operating capacity rate of not >95% >95% >95% >95% >95% less than 95% The Airport Enterprise Fund will maintain adequate cash >25% >25% >25% >25% >25% reserves of 25% of their operating expenditures Target cost per enplaned passenger of not greater than 5.41 11.25* 8.11* 8.16 9.94 $20.00 *Reflects impacts of COVID-19 167 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Airports SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS William W. Wyatt,Department Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 55,291,455 62,544,471 71,058,829 O& M 13,639,970 17,492,700 18,938,100 Charges&Services 92,873,280 115,087,200 118,528,368 Interest&Bond Expenses 120,982,005 139,833,200 123,662,900 Capital Expenditures 451,278,574 49,574,100 188,100,800 Transfers Out — 150,000 150,000 Total Department of Airports 734,065,283 384,681,671 520,438,997 DIVISION BUDGETS Office of the Director 1,525,890 2,079,942 1,890,775 4.50 Finance&Accounting 587,108,255 204,495,275 322,696,040 15.50 Operation 44,402,011 55,907,488 55,303,646 201.80 Commercial Services 4,816,623 6,194,728 6,767,575 15.00 Maintenance 70,212,574 82,419,899 98,040,783 314.50 Planning and Environmental 1,599,387 2,132,218 3,039,050 15.00 Engineering 2,786,726 3,938,376 3,799,151 28.00 Information Technology 11,266,852 15,260,060 15,316,701 41.00 Public Relations and Marketing 1,262,693 1,778,685 1,879,976 4.00 Airport Police 9,194,568 10,475,000 11,705,300 Total Department of Airports 734,175,579 384,681,671 520,438,997 FUNDING SOURCES Airport Fund 289,652,375 342,868,171 344,445,997 639.30 Airport Terminal Redevelopment 444,523,204 41,813,500 175,993,000 Total Department of Airports 734,175,579 384,681,671 520,438,997 FTE by Fiscal Year 610.80 619.30 639.30 168 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Airports FY 2024 Department Budget O & M Personal Services 18,938,100 71,058,829 Charges & Services Transfers Out 118,528,368 150,000 Capital Expenditures Interest& Bond Expenses 188,100,800 123,662,900 16y Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 170 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 e OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Katherine Lewis City Attorney PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Sim Gill (CIVIL DIVISION) Katherine Lewis City Prosecutor City Attorney Criminal Screening, Litigation Mayor, City Council and Appeal and Executive Support Citizen Screenings Litigation Fusion Center Support Risk Management Restorative Justice Programs Department/Division Counsels Special Assignments RECORDER'S OFFICE RISK MANAGEMENT Cindy Lou Trishman •••••••:••••••• Lauree Roberts City Recorder Risk Manager Records Management Property Elections Liability Claims Workers'Compensation Toss Prevention 171 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney Office of the Salt Lake City Attorney DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT Our goal is to be valued and trusted partners, recognized and relied upon for our expertise, creativity, and commitment to advancing the City's goals. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT The City Attorney's Office's mission is to provide high-quality,timely legal advice to the City and be relied upon as a trusted, productive, and positive City team member. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Office of the Salt Lake City Attorney includes a section responsible for civil matters and administration, a section responsible for risk management, and a section responsible for prosecutions or criminal matters and the Office of the City Recorder. The Office of the Salt Lake City Attorney strives to supervise and coordinate efforts of its four Divisions. From an administrative perspective,the Office closely coordinates with Risk Management on litigation matters and claims submitted against the City.The City Attorney also works with the Prosecutor's Office on budgetary and administrative matters and works with the Recorder's Office to serve the City's goals of transparency and compliance with the law. 172 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Department Performance Measurements Actualls Projected Projected Maintain an hourly rate for services provided by the City Attorney's Office (CAO)to less 50% 50% TBD 50% TBD than 50% of the average rates the City pays for outside counsel Maintain the number of open litigation holds to less than a 3% 1% increase TBD TBD TBD 10% increase from year to Decrease year Maintain the number of open litigation cases to less than a 11% 1% increase TBD TBD TBD 10% increase from year to Decrease year Maintain a disposition rate of 90% 80% TBD 85% TBD 85% or higher. Have City Council Minutes approved and available to the 95% 70% TBD 95% TBD public within 30 days at least 95% of the time. Number of GRAMA requests 14,899 14,929 TBD 15,500 TBD received by the City annually Annual percentage increase 36% .2% TBD TBD in GRAMA requests Process, activate, and digitize all contracts entered into on behalf of Salt Lake City within 100% 90% TBD 100% TBD three working days 100% of the time Number of workers' compensation claims filed, 275 571 TBD 570 TBD based on date of injury Number of property damage claims filed, based on date of 241 172 TBD 209 TBD loss. Number of bodily injury claims filed, based on date of 30 31 TBD 34 TBD loss 173 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Katherine Lewis, City Attorney FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 7,720,835 9,019,842 10,269,631 O&M 66,294 98,846 98,841 Charges&Services 5,069,436 7,655,721 7,922,884 Capital Expenditures 9,867 30,840 85,844 Total Attorney's Office 12,866,433 16,805,248 18,377,201 DIVISION BUDGETS City Attorney's Office(Civil Division) 4,963,036 7,171,610 7,588,241 27.00 City Recorder 760,998 1,207,858 1,354,287 11.00 Risk Management 4,279,412 4,627,849 4,856,345 3.80 Prosecutor's Office 3,307,618 3,797,932 4,578,328 31.50 Total Attorney's Office 13,311,064 16,805,248 18,377,201 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 7,625,254 9,007,633 10,150,844 60.50 Governmental Immunity Fund 1,919,286 3,169,767 3,370,012 10.00 Risk Fund 3,766,524 4,627,849 4,856,345 2.80 Total Attorney's Office 13,311,064 16,805,248 18,377,201 FTE by Fiscal Year 66.75 70.30 73.30 FY 2024 Department Budget Personal Services Capital Expenditures 10,269,631 85,844 Charges and Services 7,922,884.12 O & M 98,841.44 174 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY Katherine Lewis, City Attorney Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted General Fund budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 158,421 Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 41,886 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (35,608) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 19,592 This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Attorneys'Office as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Salary Proposal 339,500 This increase reflects the Attorney's Office portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 66,500 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 32,849 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Policy Issues Contracted Services Adjustments 33,324 The budget includes funding for cost increases in Sterling Codifier/American Legal Gov QA, Westlaw, the SL County Prosecutor's Office and FTK Central. Special Project Analysis&Automation (Grade 26)(10 Mths)-Salary Only 99,509 Funding is included for a position to assist with the build-out of processes including but not limited to: Attorney Laserfiche Records/Process Automation,Transition Records Management(Elected Offices), Noticing Automation/Process collaboration with Civic Engagement and various City Departments/ Divisions, Closed Session and Legal Opinion Records Management, and Information Governance for software products recently implemented for use. Salary Adjustment for Prosecutors 200,000 The Attorney General's Office adopted a new salary schedule for all AG attorneys, which went into effect April 2023.This request of additional funds will be used to adjust the market salary range for the City Prosecutor's Office attorneys. 175 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney Prosecutor's-Assistant Prosecutor(Grade 34)(10 Months)(Miami Model) 132,238 Salt Lake City has been collaborating with Salt Lake County,the District Attorney,the Sheriffs Office, the justice Courts,the State Office of Homeless Services, and service providers over the past two years on new solutions and systemic improvements to better address the population of residents experiencing homelessness who are also suffering from severe mental and behavioral health and/or addiction and are incompatible with the current systems and services. The Sequential Intercept or "Miami Model" is a collaborative system of diversion out of the criminal justice system and into housing, treatment, and services. Office Reconfiguration 55,000 Improve office areas including the addition of a break area for the Attorney's office, including the consideration of necessary painting of walls/ceilings not covered in the earthquake repair funds. 176 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 El DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS FINANCE&BUDGET Real Estate Services Brent Beck Blake Thomas Division Director Director .................................................................... DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR Tammy Hunsaker Orion Goff Community Services Development Services Federal Grant&Funding One Stop Shop/Accela Our Future HOUSING STABILITY BUILDING SERVICES Permits Housing Rehab& Tony Milner Ken Anderson Construction Inspections Homeowner Program Civil Enforcement g Division Director Division Director Board of Appeals&Examiners Homeless Services Team Housing Advisory&Appeals Board Urban Design Long Range Planning Subdivisions Youth Programs YOUTH AND FAMILY PLANNING Zoning Regulations Community Programs Current Planning Kim Thomas Nick Norris Sorenson Community Planning Commission Campus Division Director Division Director Historic Landmark Comm Appeals Hearing Officer Zoning Review DIRT Development Review Transportation Planning TRANSPORTATION and Programs Investigations,Traffic Control Jon Larsen Permits,and Permit Parking Division Director Traffic Operations&Safety Transportation Advisory Board Multi-Modal Design 177 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods Department of Community and Neighborhoods DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW 1.CAN Administration 2.Building Services 3.Housing Stability 4.Planning 5.Transportation 6.Youth and Family Blake Thomas, Director Orion Goff, Deputy Director of Development Services Tammy Hunsaker, Deputy Director of Community Services MISSION STATEMENT The Department of Community and Neighborhoods creates Sustainable, Equitable, Growing, and Opportunity-rich ("SEGO") communities and neighborhoods through emphases on: 1. Upward Mobility 2. Housing Affordability 3. Community Investment 4. Transportation Options S. Neighborhood Amenities 6. Safe and Healthy Built Environments. Department Performance Measurements Actual Target Target Building Services Number of building safety and 54,940 46,686 46,307 46,000 46,000 code compliance inspections completed Transportation Number of annual service requests(stop signs, speeding, signal timing, 724 958 1,145 800 1,000 parking, etc.) Planning Number of planning applications 1,097 1,191 1,202 945 925 received annually Housing Stability Residents assisted through 4,277 10,723 11,950 9,000 8,750 programs supported by Federal funds 178 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas, Department Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 18,547,671 21,709,213 23,272,321 O&M 543,837 298,475 298,475 Charges&Services 2,633,318 7,303,459 8,469,157 Capital Expenditures 91,750 — — Total Community and 26,716,576 29,311,147 32,039,953 Neighborhoods DIVISION BUDGETS Building Services 6,367,765 7,209,567 7,685,416 64.00 Office of the Director 1,821,543 2,779,283 2,516,075 12.00 Housing Stability 3,824,989 7,800,919 8,996,818 22.00 Planning 4,330,821 4,939,342 5,426,157 42.00 Transportation 8,154,675 4,015,817 4,066,399 30.00 Youth and Family 2,216,784 2,566,219 3,349,088 25.00 Total Community and 26,716,576 29,311,147 32,039,953 Neighborhoods FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 21,410,406 29,311,147 32,039,953 195.00 Transportation Fund 5,306,170 — — Total Community and 26,716,576 29,311,147 32,039,953 Neighborhoods FTE by Fiscal Year 179.00 190.00 195.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Charges & Services 8,469,157 Personal Services 23,272,321 O & M 298,475 179 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes (110,510) Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 122,602 Annualized funding for those positions was added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (107,342) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 62,332 This increase reflects a change in insurance cost for the Department of Community and Neighborhoods as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 41,242 Finance Department FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 927,921 This increase reflects the Department of Community and Neighborhoods portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 60,236 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 48,774 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Remove Personnel Program Expenses(One-time) (22,600) The Fiscal Year 2023 budget included one-time costs associated with newly added FTE's. This budget is recommended to be removed. Remove Temporary Traffic Calming(One-time) (100,000) FY23 Budget included $200,000 for traffic calming measures,this budget reduces that amount by $100,000. This funding is for low-cost, quick-action projects to support the Livable Streets program by addressing targeted safety needs that arise within the community throughout the year. FY 2023 BA#3:Transferring Consumer Protection Analyst from Mayor's Office 108,841 The Housing and Consumer Protection Analyst will continue the past research and work performed by the City's previous Consumer Protection Analyst and will work closely with Finance and Business Licensing to assess consumer protection and residential tenant rights needs and gaps. 18o Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods FY 2023 BA#4: Lease&Tenant Improvements for Substations 130,000 Substations rent/utilities/parking for the downtown substation and N.Temple substation. FY 2023 BA#4:Transferring CIP and Impact Fees Positions to Finance (223,299) Transfer CIP and Impact Fee programs from CAN to Finance, consisting of two FTE's and an operating budget. FTE's consist of the CIP Impact Fee Manager and a Capital Improvement Program Specialist. Duplicate Position Eliminated per HR (127,537) Position eliminated due to redundancy. Policy Issues Youth & Family,Youth and Community Programs FTEs(One-time) 447,136 Funding for four FTE's who will provide program leadership for YouthCity at Fairpark location and the Fairpark Learning Center.Two FTE's at YouthCity Fairpark provides out-of-school care for school-age youth living in the Rose Park and Poplar Grove neighborhoods.Two FTE's at Fairpark Family Learning Center provides programming to increase financial security, self-sufficiency, strengthen parenting skills, and support family's health and well-being for families living in the Rose Park, Fairpark, and Poplar Grove neighborhoods. Planning- Neighborhood Amenities Study 100,000 This funding would be to hire a consultant to assist with studying and ensuring that our neighborhoods are supporting residents in order to have their basic core needs met within walking distance or through active transportation. Civil Enforcement FTEs(Grade 19)(10 Months) 194,000 Two Civil Enforcement Officer positions will be utilized for the enforcement on short term rentals (STIR).The city has experienced a continual increase in STIR illegal units. Our Civil Enforcement group has struggled with minimal availability of staff to adequately track and enforce our STIR ordinance. Business Systems Analyst II (Grade 30)(10 Months) 111,010 The budget includes funding for a Business Systems Analyst II position that will liaise between IMS, project vendors, and other city departments. This position will help to provide system administration, technical support, data, and business analysis and reporting. Youth & Family Strategic Plan 100,000 Scope and begin drafting a Strategic Plan for the Youth and Family Division to ensure the City is effectively serving our youth and not duplicating other community programs. Homeless HSD-Advantage Services 598,000 Advantage Services provides critical services that keep the City clean and free from biohazards. Over recent years, the services provided by Advantage Services expanded from a sole focus on the Rio Grande neighborhood to support cleaning needs across the entire city.This expansion of services includes Advantage Services' mobile Clean Team offering support for Encampment Impact Mitigations (EIMs) and Rapid Intervention Team (RIT) site rehabilitations. Increased funding being recommended is based on FY24 projections to fund services entirely. FOF CAN/HSD -TIP,Tenant Relocation Assistance Program 180,000 Relocation assistance to help tenants that are displaced out of their existing rental unit due to new residential development. This pilot program will assist up to 30 displaced households. FOF CAN/HSD -TIP,Tenant Resource Center and Navigation Service 92,000 Funding to facilitate the creation of a tenant resource center to assist renters in stabilizing in their existing housing. Homeless HSD-Ambassador Expansion Area Increase(One-time) 96,000 Funding is being recommended for the increased costs to recruit and retain staff of the Downtown Alliance-Ambassador Program's expanded coverage areas(North Temple, Rio Grande, Central City, and Ballpark neighborhoods). Current staffing levels and coverage areas will remain consistent. 181 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 182 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Lorena Riffo-Jenson Director ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Jacob Maxwell Deputy Director .............................................................................. BUSINESS ARTS COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIVISION 183 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development Department of Economic Development DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT Salt Lake City,the Capital City of Utah, seeks to serve as a regional leader for economic opportunities, commerce, culture and recreation, research and innovation, sustainability, and inclusiveness. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT The Department of Economic Development's(Department) mission is to build Salt Lake City as a vibrant, beautiful, prosperous, diverse, and authentic place.We do this as a professional organization through partnerships, business development, arts and culture, place-making, and revitalization,while promoting the City's many attributes. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development is working hard to make Salt Lake City a better place to build a business and also a life.Along with overseeing Economic Development initiatives, the Department focuses on business development and growing the arts through the Salt Lake City Arts Council (Arts Council).These teams have aligned resources and streamlined processes to grow and nurture a city that fosters gainful job creation,thriving business districts and neighborhoods, and a diverse arts and culture scene. The Department of Economic Development has established a building services liaison for businesses/developers to provide guidance on design review and submittal processes throughout the City.The Department has grown partnerships with key players in the Utah Economic Development ecosystem. Notably, the Economic Development Corporation of Utah (EDC Utah), Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity,Visit Salt Lake, and Salt Lake County.Also,the Department has developed local partnerships with entities that include, Salt Lake City Arts Council Foundation,the Downtown Alliance, Suazo Business Center,the Salt Lake Chamber and the Diverse Chambers of Commerce in the Salt Lake City Area. 184 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development *Business Development Division Performance Measurements Business Development 2020 Actual 2021 Actual 2022 Actua 1 2023 Target 2024 Target Performance Measure Business Recruitment and Retention 189 64 165 >_225 >_225 Site Visits New Leads Generated 211 131 194 >_200 >_220 New Opportunities Created from 147 138 242 >_110 >_130 Leads WINS (Written Impact Narrative) co- published investment successes 11 11 16 >_15 >_12 with companies *Note:It is important to recognize that during the COVID-19 Pandemic, it has been difficult to perform some of the activities that are part of the work of the Economic Development Team. The Department created several programs related to the pandemic, and these programs impacted our regular metrics. Arts Council (Division) Mission Statement The mission of the Salt Lake City Arts Council is to promote, present, and support artists and arts organizations in order to facilitate the development of the arts and expand awareness, access, and engagement. Arts Council Performance 2020 Actual 2021 Actuals 2022 Actual 2023 Target 2024 Target Measure Attendees N/A 36,070.00 68,594.00 40,000.00 45,000.00 Artists Served N/A 1,532.00 3,265.00 1,500 2,000.00 Total Grants Awarded 108 151 141 150 115 185 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Lorena Riffo Jenson, Department Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 2,021,871 2,798,571 3,035,078 O&M 14,633 43,800 43,800 Charges&Services 445,236 453,249 556,213 Capital Expenditures 160,424 400,000 400,000 Total Economic Development 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 DIVISION BUDGETS Economic Development 1,702,227 2,422,723 2,614,282 14.00 Arts Council 689,936 1,022,897 1,170,809 8.00 Cultural Core 250,000 250,000 250,000 Total Economic Development 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 22.00 Total Economic Development 2,642,163 3,695,620 4,035,091 FTE by Fiscal Year 18.00 22.00 22.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures 400,000 Personal Services 3,035,078.24 Charges and Services 556,212.88 O & M 43,799.88 186 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 73,916 Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY 2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Insurance Rate Changes 6,244 This increase reflects a change in the insurance cost for the Department of Economic Development as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Salary Proposal 127,439 This increase reflects the Department of Economic Development's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Pension Changes (17,205) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 36,134 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 12,943 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) Policy Issues Health Care Innovation Youth Summit(Ongoing) 20,000 Funding is being requested to create education-to-workforce partnerships.These funds will ensure this the summit from 2022 continues from year to year. For reference, the 2022 summit brought 40-50 High School Students through 3 Health Care Innovation businesses to be inspired by varying technologies and job opportunities.The day ended with a student track at the BioHive Summit, where students interacted with a room full of employers, participated in a STEM activity, and heard from the Mayor and leaders in the industry. Department of Economic Development Strategic Plan 80,000 Funding is included to engage a consultant to build on the work done in the previous strategic plan and includes changes within the economic landscape in Salt Lake City since 2020.This effort will clearly define objectives to help accomplish Economic Development's organizational structure, projects, programs, and the priorities and initiatives set by the Mayor and City Council. 187 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 188 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Finance DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 BUSINESS NTS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ACQUISITION & ANALYSTS Mary Beth Thompson MANAGEMENT Chief Financial Officer ........................................................................................................................... Aaron Price Lisa Hunt Payroll Deputy Director Deputy Director Financial Analysis oe ACCOUNTING & PURCHASING & REVENUE OPERATIONS POLICY& BUDGET FINANCIAL REPORTING CONTRACTS Russell Sundquist Christopher Jennings Arturo Garcia Vacant Controller Chief Procurement Officer Director Director Financial Reporting Purchasing Revenues Budget Facilitation Capital/Fixed Asset Contract Business Licensing Budget Development Reporting Development Civil Unit Citywide Policies& Accounts Payable Collections Procedure ............................................................................ Budget Amendments TREASURER'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATIVE AUDIT Marina Scott Sharon Mangelson Treasurer Director Cashiering Auditing Cash&Debt Fraud,Waste&Abuse Management Special Assessments 189 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Finance Finance Department DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT As stewards of public resources,we continually strive to excel in providing accurate, clear, relevant, complete, and timely information through the development and implementation of innovative programs and processes. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT In the spirit of service and dedication,the Finance Department develops efficient and sustainable solutions to manage and safeguard Salt Lake City's financial resources. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Finance Department consists of six divisions: the Treasurer's Office, Purchasing and Contracts,Accounting and Financial Reporting,Administrative Audit, Revenue Operations, and Policy and Budget. Grants Acquisition and Management, Financial Analytics, and Capital Asset Planning are also housed within the department. Each division is vital to Salt Lake City's financial health and functionality. • Accounting and Financial Reporting is responsible overall for payments and financial reporting required by state law. • Policy and Budget primarily focuses on ushering anything budget-related within the City's financial functions through all the required steps in the budgeting and budget amendment process. • Purchasing and Contracts Management staff are responsible for researching, developing, procuring, and contracting for operational supplies and services required for each City department to function within its defined scope. • Administrative Audit functions entail auditing internal processes, policies, procedures and investigating allegations of fraud, waste and abuse as well as maintaining the fraud,waste and abuse hotline. • Revenue Operations functions entail helping all departments collect on all past-due revenues and ensure that revenues are coming into the City in a timely manner. • The Treasurer's Office has the primary responsibility of ensuring the City's fiduciary responsibilities relating to the collection, management, and disbursement of public funds are handled responsibly. Department Performance Measurements Maintain a General Fund Balance 14.60% 21.36% 23.96% >15% >15% between 15%and 18% Maintain the City's prestigious AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA rating Igo Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Finance SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 7,597,933 9,307,253 10,634,718 O&M 342,183 700,174 780,174 Charges&Services 3,255,399 4,741,919 5,573,153 Capital Expenditures 424,149 1,153,000 1,145,000 Total Finance Department 11,619,664 15,902,346 18,133,045 DIVISION BUDGETS Accounting&Financial Reporting 2,529,351 2,666,162 2,229,781 24.00 Policy&Budget 621,815 1,577,618 3,131,494 9.00 Purchasing&Contracts 997,836 1,266,089 1,558,727 13.00 Revenue&Collections 1,851,485 2,233,011 2,073,612 23.00 Internal Audit&Financial Analysis 893,288 1,134,336 1,248,797 4.00 Treasurer's Office 1,655,112 1,868,193 1,961,447 9.00 OneSolution Maintenance 3,075,269 5,156,937 5,929,187 Total Finance Department 11,624,156 15,902,346 18,133,045 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 8,513,325 10,709,847 12,168,296 81.70 IMS Fund 3,075,269 5,156,937 5,929,187 Risk Fund 35,562 35,562 35,562 0.30 Total Finance Department 11,624,156 15,902,346 18,133,045 FTE by Fiscal Year 72.00 77.00 82.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Transfers Out 0 Personal Services Capital Expenditures 10,634,718 1,145,000 Charges and Services 5,573,153 O & M 780,174 191 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Finance DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 22,701 Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 86,135 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (43,469) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 31,584 This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Finance Department as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 12,282 Finance Department FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 425,852 This increase reflects the Department of Finance's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 120,078 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 73,872 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Remove Purchasing Outreach (One-time) (30,000) Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget for the Purchasing division to undertake efforts at outreach to diverse and local businesses. This funding was one-time and will be removed in this budget. FY 2023 BA#4: Contract Development Specialists 197,800 The budget includes continued funding for two Contract Development Specialist positions added in budget amendment#4 of FY 2023. These positions were added to address the growing number of contract requests being submitted to the Purchasing division. FY 2023 BA#4:Transferring CIP and Impact Fees Positions to Finance 223,299 The budget includes continued funding for two positions that were moved from CAN in budget amendment#4 of FY 2023. 192 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Finance Policy Issues Personnel and Professional Development 169,842 Funding is included for Finance department personnel and professional development, including funding for 0.5 FTE needed for oversight on grants and gifts, re-classing certain positions and providing bonuses for employees who provided extraordinary effort on the ERP implementation, and funding for training and professional development to enhance skills and ensure the department is complying with rules and regulations. Ongoing Software and Inflation - Resource X and E-Civis 84,200 In the past,funding for Resource X and E-Civis software and services has been funded through a grant or absorbed within the Finance department's existing budget. The grant funding has ended and it has now become necessary to increase the budget to continue to provide ongoing Program Based Budgeting services and software. This funding also includes software and the accompanying consulting service to help the department to create a unified methodology for all fees that need to be charged across the City. Financial Analyst II for Salt Lake Foundation (Grade 24)(10 Months) 89,373 The budget includes funding for a Financial Analyst II position that will be utilized to review and analyze funding allocations related to the Salt Lake Foundation. Radio Transfer to IMS (5,100) The existing budget for radios within the Finance department are being transferred to IMS to manage. 193 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 194 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Fire Department FIRE DEPARTMENT Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 III OFFICE OF THE CHIEF Administration Karl Lieb Accounting/Finance Fire Chief Rusty McMicken Emergency Management Deputy Chief ............................:............................ ASSISTANT CHIEF ASSISTANT CHIEF Christopher Milne Michael Fox Operations Administration City Operations Division Logistics Airport Operations Fire Prevention Training Medical Services Technology Services Community Relations 195 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Fire Department Fire Department DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT The Salt Lake City Fire Department provides exceptional emergency services with progression and efficiency. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT Prepare Effectively. Respond Professionally. Impact Positively. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Salt Lake City Fire Department specializes in urban structural firefighting, emergency medical services, and emergency management. The Department has 402 funded,full-time equivalent positions, divided into two battalions, serving in 14 stations covering 97 square miles. All Firefighters hold a certification as Emergency Medical Technicians (Basic Life Support).The Department also has firefighters trained to specialty levels of Engineer, Hazardous Materials (Hazmat),Airport Rescue Firefighter(ARFF), Swift Water Rescue (SWR) and, Heavy Rescue (HRT), improving customer service delivery. The Fire Administration Division comprises the Logistics, Community Relations, Fire Prevention, Medical Services, and Technology Division. Logistics provides support for all fire apparatus the department uses and they maintain the fire facilities' and fire equipment. Fire Prevention reviews all buildings and proposed new construction. Medical Services overseas the Community Health Access Team (CHAT), Medical Response Team (MRT), CPR training, and Continuing Medical Education (CME)for the department.Technology oversees all radio upkeep, station alerting, and computer programs/software related to the department. Fire Operations consist of Station Operations,Airport Operations, and the Training Division. Firefighters are trained and ready to respond, meeting our core mission of service to the public.The department maintains four firefighters per emergency unit to operate at the most effective and efficient level possible and to protect firefighters from the dangers associated with fighting fires. Each fire unit assigned to the Operations Division is required to perform monthly business inspections. Firefighters assigned to the Airport are the first responders to the airfield and trained to the specialty level of Airport Rescue Firefighter(ARFF). 196 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Fire Department FIRE DEPARTMENT Karl Lieb,Fire Chief Department Performance Measurements Improved turnout times Ahead of Ahead of Ahead of Ahead of Ahead of Target Target Target Target Target Reduce Operational Injuries Ahead of Ahead of Ahead of Ahead of Ahead of Target Target Target Target Target Fire Prevention will complete 4,300 4,835 3,539 3,635 >4,300 >4,300 inspections per year 197 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Fire Department SALT LAKE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT Karl Lieb,Fire Chief FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 42,532,162 45,701,152 48,929,889 O&M 1,174,706 1,178,080 1,178,080 Charges&Services 1,675,982 1,638,260 2,087,388 Capital Expenditures 29,544 69,000 69,000 Total Fire Department 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 DIVISION BUDGETS Fire Administrative Services 7,076,638 8,074,836 8,765,647 79.00 Fire Office of the Chief 3,403,482 3,643,670 4,243,219 9.00 Fire Operations 34,932,273 36,867,986 39,255,491 314.00 Total Fire Department 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 402.00 Total Fire Department 45,412,393 48,586,492 52,264,357 FTE by Fiscal Year 374.00 392.00 402.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures: 4,140,918 Personal Services: 15,797,595 Charges &Services 11,878,302 O & M 810,939 198 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Fire Department FIRE DEPARTMENT Karl Lieb,Fire Chief Changes discussed below represent changes to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget. Personal Services Base to Base Changes (427,873) Base to base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 196,887 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (9,922) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 154,172 This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Fire Department as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 379,018 Fire Department FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 1,881,004 This increase reflects the Fire Department's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 10,518 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 22,305 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) Remove Turn-out Gear(One-time) (12,000) The Fiscal Year 2023 budget included funding for the rising cost of firefighter turnout gear and one-time funding for a small HVAC system for the Fire Logistics PPE room. This budget is recommended to be removed. Remove Program Expenses(One-time) (48,400) The Fiscal Year 2023 budget included funding for the expansion of the MRT program. The request included one-time funding for a medical kit including 12-lead monitor, medical supplies, etc. This budget is recommended to be removed. 199 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Fire Department Policy Issues Fire Contract& Inflationary Increases 274,765 This budget includes funding to tackle the high-inflationary environment of doing business. The increases will go towards utility costs, software/maintenance/supply contracts, communication contracts, and other miscellaneous contracts. (CHAT) Community Health Access Team Enhancements 390,667 These enhancements are to develop and optimize the Community Health Access Team (CHAT) with an additional 4 Social Worker FTEs, as well as fund CHAT program expenses such as uniforms,training, and education. Fire Captain - Medical Division (6-Months) 75,452 Consistent with the Fire department's Strategic Plan and growth of the Community Health Access Team (CHAT)/Medical Response Team (MRT), this line will fund an additional Fire Captain FTE beginning January 2024. Dept. of Airports-ARFF/MRT FTEs(100% Revenue Budgeted) 764,666 In partnership with the Salt Lake City Department of Airports,this will fund the creation of a Medical Response Team (MRT) squad within the concourses of SLC International Airport. The new squad consists of 4 additional firefighter FTEs with service slated to begin January 2024. This line also funds 1 additional Fire Captain FTE. SCBA Compressor& Hydrostatic Testing(One-time) 114,000 One-time funding will provide for a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus(SCBA)compressor replacement at Fire Station #1. It will also fund hydrostatic testing for SCBA oxygen bottles that are part of a Firefighters Personal Protective Equipment(PPE). Versaterm Transfer to IMS(for Software Systems&Tech) (48,159) In conjunction with the Police Department, SLCFD is transferring the responsibility and budget of Versaterm software costs to IMS. Radio Transfer to IMS (39,235) This line will transfer Fire's portion of the City-wide radio allocation to IMS. 200 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 ...... Ono Christie Marcy �—� ...... Ton a Richardson y Office Administrator Police Civilian Review Board DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Debra Alexander Jami Mccart ........ Chief Human Resources Officer ...... vacant Workplace Equity Deputy Chief Human Program Manager Resources Officer ......................................................................................:....................................................................................... BENEFITS EDUCATION COMPENSATION AND HRIS CLASSIFICATION Lori Gaitin Stephanie Yau James Phelps Program Manager Program Manager David Salazar Program Manager Program Manager EMPLOYEE RELATIONS RECRUITING AND ONBOARDING David Buchannan P Jennifer Jeppson Program Manager Program Manager 201 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources Human Resources DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT To help Salt Lake City thrive through sustainable and effective human resource business practices, policies, and investment in the City's greatest asset, its employees,to work collaboratively within departments and with city leaders. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT We deliver best-in-class service and programs, add strategic value to Salt Lake City Corporation, and promote an engaged and dedicated workforce committed to the highest levels of public service. We are focused on attracting the best talent, promoting opportunities for growth and development, and providing fair and competitive compensation packages for all employees. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Department of Human Resources is a team of 36 full-time employees and provides services for all City employees. The Administrative Team establishes goals and manages the operations of the HR department. Benefits ensure employees have comprehensive and competitive benefits packages including, medical, dental,vision and life insurance programs, a large portfolio of voluntary benefits, and an employee health clinic. Compensation and Classification are responsible for ensuring that the City maintains a competitive and equitable position with respect to pay.This is achieved by conducting numerous salary surveys each year and recommending necessary market adjustments and general wage increases employees need to maintain a competitive pay position. Employee Relations manages all disciplinary actions, and ADA compliance requests for city employees. Members of this team are the front-line HR representatives for departments across the City. This team also manages the City's leave programs including FMLA and short-term and long-term disability benefits. Workplace Equity investigates workplace violations of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act and City policy, ensuring that the City is a safe and enjoyable place for all to be employed. Employees' University manages a robust learning and development program including new employee orientation, supervisor boot camp, soft skill courses and access to thousands of online courses. 202 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources Human Resources Information Systems(HRIS)works closely with I M S to manage the maintenance and integration of HR's various technology systems. Recruiting and Onboarding are responsible for recruiting all positions city-wide with a focus on a diverse and well-qualified City workforce.Additionally,this team has developed a comprehensive onboarding and off-boarding process. Funding for the department is provided by the general and risk funds. Department Performance Measurements Performance Measures 2019Actual 2020Actuall 2021Actuall 2022Actual 2023Target Complete the implementation of Workday modules in all HR divisions: HRIS, benefits, education, n/a** n/a** ongoing ongoing completed compensation and classification, employee relations and recruiting and onboarding.* Respond to EEO complaints, including a investigation when <60 <_60 <60 <60 <60 appropriate, in an average of 60 days or fewer. Each Human Resource Business Partner will attend a minimum of 30 staff and managerial meetings within >30 >30 >30 >30 >30 their respective departments per year. Increase participation in financial wellness programs offered to n/a** n/a** n/a** n/a** 5% employees by Salt Lake City by 5%. Decrease the "time-to-fill"job recruitment timeframe for n/a** n/a** n/a** n/a** 5% historically hard-to-fill positions by 5%, City-wide. *New goal in 2023 **Data unavailable 203 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 3,631,288 4,615,081 4,949,830 O&M 22,780 67,714 69,283 Charges&Services 44,131,499 49,605,192 53,547,193 Transfers Out 1,326,627 — 3,442,361 Total Department of Human 49,112,194 54,287,987 62,008,666 Resources DIVISION BUDGETS Administration 823,060 927,114 841,838 12.40 Recruiting&Onboarding 602,732 846,279 1,043,669 7.00 Education 266,686 321,254 349,134 2.00 Civilian Review Board 211,724 177,000 186,564 1.00 HR Information Systems 298,706 394,196 598,140 2.00 Employee Relations 950,816 1,570,993 1,639,955 9.00 Risk Management 45,958,469 50,051,151 57,349,366 4.60 Total Department of Human 49,112,194 54,287,987 62,008,666 Resources FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 3,153,725 4,236,836 4,659,300 33.40 Risk Fund 45,958,469 50,051,151 57,349,366 4.60 Total Department of Human 49,112,194 54,287,987 62,008,666 Resources FTE by Fiscal Year 31.00 36.00 38.00 204 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources FY 2024 Department Budget Charges &Services 53,547,193 Personal Services 4,949,830 O & M 69,283 205 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted General Fund bud-get. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes (125,559) Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 84,378 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (19,985) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 10,596 This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Human Resources Department as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Salary Proposal 172,248 This increase reflects the Department of Human Resource's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 22,566 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. Policy Issues Project&Policy Manager(Grade 24)(10 Months) 121,588 This position will revise HR policies to reflect changes brought by Workday, regulatory changes, DEI best practices as well as to act as a dedicated internal financial operations point-person for the department. Business Partner I (Grade 25)(10 Months) 128,460 This entry-level position will focus on departmental needs and support, harassment/discrimination investigations and training, special projects and program development for succession planning and organizational development. Operational Expense Increases 10,172 Many Human Resources operational line items have not increased in more than 10 years.These operational needs include staff certifications, office supplies, educational workshops, retreats and computer maintenance. Pre-Employment Screening(Transfer from Public Services) 18,000 This consolidates dollars that have previously been in other departments to HR to keep onboarding costs in one place. This requires no new City money to fund. 2o6 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer � 0 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Aaron Bentley Chief Information Officer .......................................................................................................................................................... DEPT LEADERSHIP & INNOVATIONS OPERATIONS ADMIN SERV Chad Korb Aaron Bentley Nole Walkingshaw Deputy Chief Chief Information Officer Chief Innovations Officer Information Officer Department Leadership Administration Finance and Asset Management Project and Solution ................................................................. . Management INNOVATION AND MEDIA& ENGAGEMENT PROJECT MANAGMENT SERVICES Elizabeth Buehler John Rand Director Director ................................................................................................................................................................................ IT SUPPORT IMS DEPARTMENT DATA ANALYTICS SOFTWARE SUPPORT Darrell Lopez SUPPORT AND GIS SERVICES Director Jason Struck Nick Kryger Reza Faraji Chief Information Chief Data/Geographic Chief Technology Officer Security Officer Officer Director of Software Services 207 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services Information Management Services DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT Modernize municipal government through sustainable technology solutions. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to be a trustworthy and valued partner that delivers the right information to the right audience at the right time. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Salt Lake City's Information Management Services department assists Salt Lake City employees in providing essential city services through technology.The department has six divisions: Office of the CIO The Chief Information Officer(CIO) is the Information Management Services department director and leads the administrative office. It works with department and division heads across the City and partners to deliver technology solutions that modernize municipal government and connect the City to its constituents.The CIO has two deputy directors, Nole Walkingshaw and Chad Korb who directly support him. The Financial Services Team is dedicated to procurement and asset management and oversees the business and supply chain activities within IMS and for the City computers and technology distributed throughout the city.They manage the daily operations of accounts payable, budget, office management duties, procurement, receiving, management, and disposal of all I.T. hardware and software assets for the City. The Enterprise Project Management team coordinates with City departments to help them navigate I.T. systems and projects. Working with departments,they create project plans and resource allocations necessary to accomplish the given task and see the projects and solutions throughout the product life-cycle. Data Analytics and Geographic Information Systems(GIS) Led by the Chief Data Officer/Geographic Information Officer(CDO)(CGO).This team is responsible for Data Analytics, Data Standards, Data Policies, Smart Cities initiative, and Enterprise GIS for Salt Lake City.They assist departments in using data to drive informed decision-making processes.The team also assists the City in its transparency initiatives by providing easy access methods to City data. 208 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services Infrastructure Technology and Security Division Led by the Chief Information Security Officer, this division is responsible for monitoring and administering the I.T. Infrastructure across the city. The division consists of Cybersecurity, Network, and Systems Engineering teams. It ensures that the network, systems, and users hosted in the City have full access to their data in the most secure manner possible. Responsibilities for this division include Network and Security infrastructure(across more than 50 locations and 2 data centers), internet connectivity, unified communications, remote work infrastructure, cloud infrastructure, enterprise backup systems,wired and wireless communications, and numerous 3rd party applications among others. Media Services Division Salt Lake City Media & Engagement Services is the in-house social &civic engagement, content design &creation, broadcast, and communications consulting division of Information Management Services. Our goal is to be a centralized city-wide service accessible to every department and division. Software Services Led by the Chief Technology Officer(CTO),the team designs, develops, integrates, and maintains software solutions that the City procures or develops.They also maintain City databases and create custom reporting solutions. The team works with departments to reduce the software footprint and standardize enterprise solutions.The application portfolio still sits at almost 200 applications, but several enterprise solutions have slowed the growth, and several antiquated systems have collapsed into new centralized systems. We are also in the process of modernizing several systems/applications and conducting the move of many enterprise and departmental software packages to the cloud." Innovations Team This team is led by the Chief Innovations Officer(CINNO).They have been tasked with modernizing the city processes and procedures to bring a new high level of efficiency and accuracy. One of their primary assignments is implementing a new Workday ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning)system,which will be a multi-year, multi-million dollar project that will help streamline and improve the finance, accounting, asset management, and human resources systems. Field Services Team Led by the I.T.Technology Support Manager,the Field Services division is responsible for supporting vast and diverse end-user software and hardware.The division must also ensure the user data and systems are secure and running at maximum efficiency.This division, consisting of Network Support Administrators and Field Support Staff, is responsible for computer systems installation and maintenance, system failure triage, incident routing, escalation, and monitoring. Field Services also supports other IMS division field services, help desk services, and on-site support for all city employees. toy Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES IMS Department Performance Measurements Measure 2020 Actual 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Target 2024 Target Citywide I.T. assets inventoried 33% 75% 89% 100% 100% on an annual basis. Case Closed by staff within standard response thresholds 89% 92% 91% 99% 99% based on priority, severity, and system. Objective and Key Results (OKR) and Continuous Feedback and Recognition 33% 40% 50% 100% 100% (CFR) Program implemented in department. Projects that followed agile project management 65% 80% 85% 100% 100% methodology. 210 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 9,907,241 13,369,733 15,797,595 O&M 513,553 278,655 810,939 Charges&Services 5,622,110 8,476,576 11,878,302 Interest&Bond Expenditures 661,989 — — Capital Expenditures 360,253 3,250,266 4,140,918 Total Information Management 17,065,145 25,375,230 32,627,754 Services DIVISION BUDGETS Applications Admin&Support 1,636,304 2,809,691 3,193,787 Services Data Analytics&GIS 552,755 725,885 980,073 5.00 Dept Leadership&Admin Services 2,510,894 4,071,134 4,978,851 14.00 Enterprise Software Services 1,920,357 2,599,156 3,370,570 3.00 IMS Department Support 3,174,089 4,020,325 7,231,597 34.00 Info Management Services 66,207 161,800 226,800 Information Security 326,386 936,238 976,238 Multimedia Services 817,123 1,305,364 1,630,642 12.00 Network Services 1,602,261 2,505,412 3,645,133 PC Replacement 575,692 983,000 1,353,316 Software Support Services 3,883,076 5,257,225 5,040,746 32.00 Total Information Management 17,065,144 25,375,230 32,627,754 Services FUNDING SOURCES IMS Fund 17,065,145 25,375,230 32,627,754 100.00 Total Information Management 17,065,145 25,375,230 32,627,754 Services FTE by Fiscal Year 84.00 92.00 100.00 211 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures 4,140,918 Personal Services 15,797,595 Charges &Services 11,878,302 O & M 810,939 212 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer Changes discussed below represent changes to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 858,423 Base-to-Base changes compare personal services costs adopted as part of the FY 2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Insurance Rate Changes (34,683) This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Department of Information Management Service as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Pension Changes 92,058 The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System Annual Salary Proposal 566,867 This increase reflects a 5% cost of living increase that is being proposed. Policy Issues New Positions 912,551 Positions needed to support city operations. • Office Facilitator(From Part-time) • Cyber Security Analyst • Field Support • Data Analyst • Change Manager • Web Content Specialist • Communication Engineer • Director of Communications/Branding Council Remote Meeting Professional Services 30,000 To support the consulting services to hire consultants to professionally produce up to 6 remote meetings for the city council. Contractual Changes 1,163,509 Increase in changes that are required based on contracts made in prior years.These include software such as Microsoft Office,Adobe, and Workday. New FTE's Cost for Computer, Software, and Other Items Applicable for Their Positions 186,914 New employees require specific equipment when they are hired.This is the increase needed to get that equipment and allow them the tools they need to perform their jobs.This may range from software such as the licenses for Microsoft and Adobe to Radios for those that need them. Transfers from Other Departments To IMS 690,733 Software administration that is getting transferred from other departments to IMS. 213 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services Consulting Services 270,000 As the city is growing, specific expertise to develop services is not found within the city. Consulting services can provide these. Some of the services that are being requested include Workday,Azure, and Salesforce. Software for Other Departments Which Will Be Administered By IMS 720,000 This software includes a Treasury Management Software and a Capital Asset Planning software Radio Project Completion 2,450,000 The remaining cost to complete the radio project. This includes the cost of radios needed for the city. PC Replacement Increase 118,402 Computer cost have increased significantly in the last couple of years.This is in addition to the increased number of employees who need these computers within the general fund. This is the increase in operating cost for these computers. 214 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Justice Courts SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 JUSTICE COURT JUDGES JoJo Liu Jeanne Robison ......... JUSTICE COURT ......... COURT SECURITY Clemens Landau Curtis Preece Contract Provider Sydney Magid Katherine Peters Court Administrator ............................................................................................................................ SECTION MANAGER SECTION MANAGER FINANCIAL MANAGER Sharon Nez Tammy Shelton Valeta Hitchcock Hearings Specialty Courts Hearings on Contractual and Budget Reporting&Analysis Conviction/Acquittal Service Disputes Revenue and Expenses Reporting Small Claims and Civil AR/AP Interpreters Traffic School Cashiering Jury Expungements Payroll Homeless Court Homeless Outreach Veterans Court Case Management Case Management Criminal Cases/Jury 215 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Justice Courts Salt Lake City Justice Court MISSION STATEMENT Ensure the highest standards of justice, professionalism, responsiveness, and respect for those we serve. VISION STATEMENT Creating a court that is just, equitable, and trusted by all. COURT CORE VALUES Excellence Having the desire to succeed and the motivation to reach our full potential, going above and beyond to accomplish the task at hand. Respect Recognize and appreciate the value of each individual and their experience and situation. Integrity Doing what we say we are going to do, applying honesty and accountability with openness. Community Bridging the gap between the Court, community and other agencies, improving access to resources and information. Unity Supporting one another and fostering growth while reaching our goals and adhering to our values. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Salt Lake City Justice Court is the largest municipal court in the State of Utah, with a very high volume of misdemeanor cases. The Court is a limited jurisdiction court under the umbrella of the Utah State Court system. We are proud to be part of the Salt Lake City portfolio of public institutions and to serve the citizens and visitors of this great city. The justice Court is responsible for and processes Class B and C misdemeanors, infractions and small claims cases,jury trials, appeals and expungements,video hearings, homeless outreach, prisoner transports, and daily interaction with jails throughout the State of Utah. The court orders, monitors and tracks probation,warrants, community service, restitution, collections of monetary penalties, appeals, expungements, and plea-in-abeyance cases.We also provide community outreach, traffic school, coordination of language interpreter services, and any ADA needs that arise. The Justice Courtjudiciary, employees, and security team are dedicated to open and transparent access to the Court, bringing justice for all, and providing a safe and civil environment for dispute resolution. 216 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Justice Courts SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT Curtis Preece,Court Administrator Department Performance Measures Actual Actual Actual Target Actual Target Average Access & Fairness- Percent of Justice Court customers NA NA NA NA N/A >90% NA satisfied with service received. Time to Disposition - 95% of criminal case dispositions should meet established 91% 58% 58% >95% 64% >95% 76% guidelines for Time to Disposition (6 months). Age of Acting Pending Cases- 95% of all criminal cases 77% 50% 67% >95% 73% >95% 70% should have a disposition within a 180-day time frame. Criminal Case Clearance Rate -A Clearance Rate of 100% means the court has disposed of as many cases as were 174% 90% 112% >100% 102% >100% 91% filed, i.e.,the court is keeping up with it's incoming caseload. 217 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Justice Courts SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT Curtis Preece, Court Administrator FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 4,199,783 4,580,603 4,870,769 O&M 49,883 65,507 65,507 Charges&Services 369,750 543,550 544,277 Capital Expenditures — 10,000 9,167 Total Justice Court 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 DIVISION BUDGETS Justice Court 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 42.00 Total Justice Court 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 42.00 Total Justice Court 4,619,415 5,199,660 5,489,720 FTE by Fiscal Year 42.00 42.00 42.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures 9,167 Charges and Services 544,277 O & M Personal Services 65,507 4,870,769 218 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Justice Courts SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT Curtis Preece, Court Administrator Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 33,574 Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Pension Changes (14,025) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System. Insurance Rate Changes 14,520 This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Justice Court as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 4,788 justice Court FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 196,489 This increase reflects the justice Court's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 5,330 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full-year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 7,029 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Policy Issues judiciary Salary Increases 42,355 The budget includes judicial salary increases to insure justice courtjudges are at 90% of proposed district courtjudges salaries. 219 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 220 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Police Department SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 ,1, oo EXECUTIVE OFFICER POLICE DEPARTMENT LEGAL ADVISOR Lieutenant Mike Brown Police Chief Human Resources Finance Professional Standards Communications Executive Detail Airport Division: Wellness Unit Patrol Central Patrol Division: Operations Operations K-9 Central Bikes Investigations Division Community FIELD OPERATIONS I FIELD OPERATIONS II Liaison Officer Pioneer Patrol Division: BUREAU BUREAU Operations Liberty Patrol Division: Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Pioneer Bikes Operations Division Community Liberty Bikes Liaison Officer Crime Intelligence Division Community Field Training Officer Analysis Unit Liaison Officer Program :....................................... INVESTIGATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE BUREAU BUREAU Deputy Chief Deputy Chief Special Operations Division: Detective Division: Support Division: Training Division: SWAT Homicide Administration In Service Special Investigations Robbery GRAMA Academy Community Operations Intelligence Policy Community Motors Sex Crimes Audit Response Team Public Order Domestic Violence Backgrounds Gangs Victim Advocates Recruiting K-9 School Resource Accreditation Park Squad Bikes Auto Theft Logistics Community Connections Team Financial Crimes Quartermaster Crisis Intervention Property Crimes Records Task Force: Accident Investigation Crime Lab DEA Task Force Evidence 221 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Police Department Police Department DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT "We will build upon the noble traditions of integrity and trust to foster a culture of service, respect and compassion toward our employees and the community we serve." DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT "We will serve as guardians of our community to preserve life, maintain human rights, protect property, and promote individual responsibility and community commitment." DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Salt Lake City Police Department serves more than 200,000 residents of Salt Lake City and a daytime population that exceeds 300,000,with 741 general fund FTEs in budget and 20 FTEs that are unfunded to facilitate hiring processes for Fiscal Year 24.The Police Department consists of the Office of the Chief, which oversees four Bureaus, Field Operations I, Field Operations II,Administrative & Operational Support Bureau, and Investigative Bureau. The Police Department will continue working to ensure professional public safety and response to the community. The department is working closely with the Mayor and City Council on a proactive approach to the needs of our community. The Police Department is working to increase efficiency by leveraging alternate response models, including civilian response staffing and the use of technologies. The Police Department will continue improving policies, increasing transparency,training, and community involvement while upholding the Mission and Vision of the Department, serve our community, and improve community relations. 222 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Police Department SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Mike Brown, Chief of Police Department Performance Measurements Response Time:the mean average police response time for priority 1 calls 7/1/22- for service from the time the call was 11:37 12:55 12:46 4/23/23 <10:00 received by dispatch to the time the 10:23 first officer was listed on scene. Social Work& Homeless Outreach: 200 referrals per quarter for services,jobs, 7/1/22- housing, education, benefits, 1089 1361 2895 3/31/23 700 substance abuse or mental health 841 treatment. IA: Review all cases of Officer Involved Critical Incidents for referral to training TBD 100% 100% 100% 100% unit for improvements in training. Provide youth outreach services and participate in a gang free education TBD 12 12 12 12 program monthly Crime Lab: Maintain officer wait time for priority 1 cases at 20 minutes or TBD 23:09 27:02 Pending <20 Minutes less. 223 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Police Department SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Mike Brown, Chief of Police FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 75,906,162 96,263,619 103,346,800 O& M 1,619,966 2,828,575 3,040,484 Charges&Services 4,442,283 4,829,848 4,589,528 Capital Expenditures 112,564 55,000 0 Total Police Department 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 DIVISION BUDGETS Office of the Chief 7,256,564 9,643,431 11,194,112 30.00 Administration 11,895,264 13,922,007 13,178,673 131.00 Police Field Ops 1 23,923,826 29,021,126 32,671,149 222.00 Police Field Ops 2 18,022,189 21,501,485 26,340,670 208.00 Investigative 20,983,133 29,888,993 27,592,208 170.00 Total Police Department 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 761.00 Total Police Department 82,080,976 103,977,042 110,976,812 FTE by Fiscal Year 720.00 750.00 761.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Charges & Services 4,589,528 O & M 3,040,484 Personal Services 103,346,800 224 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Police Department SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT Mike Brown, Chief of Police Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 80,185 Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 625,739 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (51,353) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System. Insurance Rate Changes 297,844 This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Police Department as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 8,331 Police Department FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police S00 series employees. Salary Proposal 4,182,203 This increase reflects the Police Department's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 28,874 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 74,188 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Remove New Program Start Up Expenses(One-time) (12,000) Removes funding for one-time implementation cost Remove Versaterm E-Ticketing(One-time) (60,000) Removes funding for one-time implementation cost Remove Base Pay covered by 2020 COPS Hiring grant funding (450,000) Removes funding for federal share of salary cost under the COPS Hiring grant 225 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Police Department Policy Issues Contractual Pay Items 700,000 This funding covers MOU contractual pay for shift differential Police Overtime(Revenue Offset) 483,296 This increase reflects overtime with a revenue offset for contractual and event overtime. Non-Personnel Inflationary Costs 302,991 This increase is due to inflationary increases in supplies and contracts. License Plate Reader Program 150,000 The license plate reader program has completed a successful pilot project and this funding will allow for continued use of the technology for crime control and prevention. Sergeant Internal Affairs Program (9 Months) 164,266 This funding add (1) FTE to the Internal Affairs Program to facilitate timely and thorough reporting. Increased Community Response(9 Months) 283,455 This funding adds 4 FTE's to the community response team, facilitating additional coverage and an increased call availability. Increased Airport Operations Program (9 Months) 917,361 Staffing increase for police officers at the airport for coverage of the increase in passenger numbers and the larger footprint of the new terminals. Printer Lease Management Transfer to IMS (55,000) This transfer moves funding for the printers at the Public Safety Building to IMS. Versaterm Transfer to IMS(For Software Systems&Tech) (526,380) This transfer moves funding for public safety software to IMS. Radio Transfer to IMS(Radio System) (149,230) This transfer centralizes funding for the police department's radio system to IMS. 226 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 FINANCE& DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING ••••••• ,,,,,, COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LANDS TECHNOLOGY Gregg Evans Kristin Riker Director .................................................................................................................... PLANNING &TRAILS OPERATIONS AND NATURAL LANDS Tyler Murdock Carmen Bailey Deputy Director Deputy Director PROJECTS& PARK RANGER URBAN FORESTRY PLANNING TEAM PROGRAM Tony Gliot Nick Frederick TRAILS&NATURAL PARKS GOLF ............. LANDS Toby Hazelbaker Matt Kammeyer Cemetery Parks Maintenance Regional Athletic Complex SPECIAL EVENTS Graffiti Removal PERMITTING Ryen Schlegel 227 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands Department of Public Lands DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT A vibrant system of connected public landscapes and living infrastructure that enhances the community's identity, sense of place and quality of life. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT Salt Lake City shall enhance the livability of the urban environment to ensure that the resources under our management are carefully stewarded and equitably accessible for future generations. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Department of Public Lands'four divisions are tasked with the planning, construction, coordination and acquisition of Public Lands with a community-based approach. In coordination with our many City partners, we protect, grow and enhance natural landscapes, trees, and outdoor green spaces for the health, beauty and recreational opportunities of residents and visitors to the Capital City. Administrative Services Division: provides leadership, project support, budget support, and long-term strategies and initiatives through communications, public outreach, finance, technology, information management, and policy development. Parks Division: Is the steward of and responsible for the oversight of 735 acres of park lands including City Parks, SLC Cemetery, and the Regional Athletic Complex. The Salt Lake City Parks Division ensures the preservation, development, and maintenance of parks throughout the city for the use and enjoyment of community members and visitors to Salt Lake City. Golf Division: Manages the operations of six full-service golf courses throughout the city. Golf operations include the maintenance of all green spaces, programming of golf clinics, tournaments, leagues, instruction programs and the management of the course retail pro shops, cafes, and driving ranges and cart fleet maintenance and rentals. Planning& Ecological Services Division: Oversees planning efforts including master plans, facility improvement plans and resource management plans, as well as development and implementation of Departmental initiatives and capital projects.This includes advancing the ecological health and biodiversity of the public lands system, and improving the quality, accessibility, and equity of Department lands and resources. Urban Forestry Division: Manages approximately 90,000 trees with 25,000 potential planting sites(located in city parks, on city facility properties, and along city streets and trails). The program provides most services related to the maintenance of city trees including;tree pruning,tree planting, removal, health evaluation, emergency response, project plan review/permit issuance, storm cleanup/pickup and hazard assessment. 228 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS Kristin Riker,Director Department Performance Measures . . #of Council Districts with an active 2 2 3 4 7 biodiversity enhancement project Ratio of trees planted to trees removed (a number greater than one 1.61 1.8 1.44 1.75 1.75 indicates expansion) Increase golf cart sales revenue by 0.0068 -10.93 -3 >_2% >_2% 5%** Ratio of maintained acres per 10.03 11.1 9.79 10 10.5 maintenance FTE *FY 23 are goals only. **Year over year numbers fluctuated due to FY20& FY21 Covid 19 factors. 229 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS Kristin Riker,Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 15,320,080 20,188,170 22,627,598 O&M 4,841,123 3,632,698 4,287,783 Charges&Services 6,588,559 9,282,677 10,344,652 Capital Expenditures 902,206 5,339,411 7,330,795 Interest&Bond Expenditures 496,131 512,736 510,427 Transfers Out 2,257 — — Total Department of Public 28,150,356 38,955,692 45,101,255 Lands DIVISION BUDGETS Public Lands Administration 3,598,566 2,856,418 3,392,745 17.85 Parks 11,019,015 13,981,304 15,487,723 84.85 Planning and Ecological Services 1,403,976 3,886,105 4,755,123 37.15 Urban Forestry 3,006,927 3,505,849 3,526,680 18.00 Golf 9,121,872 14,726,016 17,938,984 34.15 Total Department of Public 28,150,356 38,955,692 45,101,255 Lands FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 19,028,484 24,229,676 27,162,271 157.85 Golf Fund 9,121,872 14,726,016 17,938,984 34.15 Total Department of Public 28,150,356 38,955,692 45,101,255 Lands FTE by Fiscal Year 146.00 172.00 192.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Bonding/Debt/Interest Charges Personal Services 510,427 22,627,598 Capital Expenditures 7,330,795 Charges &Services O & M 10,344,652 4,287,783 230 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS Kristin Riker,Director Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Base-to-Base 64,583 Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 66,704 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (71,951) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 45,916 This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Department of Public Lands as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 63,049 Public Lands FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 572,829 This increase reflects the Department of Public Lands portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 29,797 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 11,078 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAC) Remove Office Configuration (One-time) (100,000) Funding was provided in FY 2023 for office reconfiguration needs. The funding will be reduced in this budget. Remove Tree Watering Campaign Education (One-time) (50,000) In the FY 2023 budget Urban Forestry was awarded $50,000 in one-time funding to work with a contracted consultant to develop and deploy promotional and outreach materials on effectively watering trees. The funding will be removed in this budget. FY 2023 BA#4: 2 Public Lands Planner Positions 229,440 In budget amendment#4 of FY 2023, two Public Lands Planner positions were added to the department. These positions are responsible for public engagement, design, consultant management, cross-departmental coordination, and implementation tasks required to complete critical Public Lands projects. 231 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands Policy Issues Inflationary&Contractual Increases 649,500 The Public Lands Department has experienced operational expense increases related to inflationary and other contractual price increases. The budget includes funding for cost increases to multiple expense categories related to utilities,fleet fuel and maintenance, operational contracts, and supplies. Expanded Citywide Events 219,500 The budget includes funding for one Special Projects Asst FTE tasked with helping to facilitate an expanded number of city-wide events. Two drone shows(for July 4th and July 24th holidays), three events in the ballpark neighborhood, and one large volunteer event to clean our all 17 miles of the Jordan River and Jordan River Trail as well as three events in the North Temple neighborhood. These are more environmentally friendly with no risk of starting fires, no chemicals that can harm the environment, no oxidizers that can contaminate waterways, no trash and are energy efficient. Parks Maintenance Tech II (Grade 16)(10 Mths),Associated Seasonal Positions and Program 305,750 Costs Funding is included for a Parks Maintenance Tech II position and the associated seasonal staff necessary to provide landscape maintenance at Folsom Trail, and at Mt View Corridor(11 acres). Sr. Natural Resource Technician (Grade 16) (10 Mths) 67,800 This full-time position will be responsible for the landscape maintenance at Cornell Riverside Natural Area wetlands and help oversee seasonal maintenance crews at other nearby natural areas including Three Creeks. Maint. Electrician IV(Grade 22)(10 Mths), Program Costs 122,800 The budget includes the addition of a Maintenance Electrician IV position that will support Public Land's existing Parks Electrician as they encounter increasing repairs and replacement due to vandalism and other ongoing maintenance needs. General Maint.Worker IV(Grade 21)(10 Mths) 79,800 The addition of this General Maintenance Worker position will support the department's Property Maintenance team providing support for ongoing maintenance and vandalism repairs and replacements for Department assets through out the City. Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III (Grade 20) (10 Mths) 76,000 This Sprinkler Irrigation Tech position will support the department's existing Parks irrigation team by providing irrigation services to Salt Lake City parks, city medians and trails. Central Control Irrigation SPE (Grade 20)(10 Mths) 76,000 The budget will add a Central Control Irrigation SPE position that will support the department's existing Parks irrigation team by managing parks, RAC, Cemetery, city medians and trails. Sr.Warehouse Operator(Grade 15)(10 Mths) 7,500 This full-time position will be partially funded by Golf funds and will support increased warehouse operations needs, order requests, and payment processing. Sr. Natural Resources Technician (Grade 16)(10 Mths),Associated Seasonal Positions and 86,600 Program Costs The addition of this Sr. Natural Resources Technician and the accompanying seasonal positions will compliment existing field-team resources with capacity for progressive expansion of biodiversity and restoration projects across Public Lands, including pre-restoration weed control and site preparation, post-restoration weed control and watering, planting, seeding,fencing and irrigation maintenance, and similar tasks. 232 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands Environmental Specialist II Union 74,700 This position will provide highly technical and specialized guidance, direction and support for the development and implementation of projects on Public Lands properties focused on biodiversity, pollinators, native plant restoration, and habitat function. Sr. Natural Resource Technician (Grade 16) (10 Mths),Associated Seasonal Positions, Program 181,200 Costs and Operational Expenses This position will provide weed removal, native planting,trail corridor maintenance,trailhead and access maintenance,way finding and interpretive signage installation and maintenance, and minor trail construction. 2 Sr. Natural Resource Technicians(Grade 16)(10 Mths) 124,000 These additional positions will provide maintenance work in SLC Foothills,this team would also complete maintenance of other soft surface trails and bike parks within SLC including, Rose Park Trails, 9Line Bike Park and Parleys Historic Nature Park. 233 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands This page intentionally left blank 234 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 9 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Jorge Chamorro PS ADMIN SERVICES Director Communications Finance ............................................................ Technology ............................:.............................. Capital Planning Safety and Security CAPITAL Julie Crookston JP Goates Deputy Director Deputy Director CITY ENGINEER COMPLIANCE Mark Stephens Erik O'Brien FACILITIES FLEET Jim Cleland Nancy Bean STREETS James Aguilar SAFETY Kristen Shulsen 235 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services The Department of Public Services The Department of Public Services provides essential services to residents, businesses, and visitors; capital improvement project development and delivery; and internal services that support all other City functions.The department's vision is to be responsive to and anticipate the needs of a growing, diverse, and vibrant city. Department funds come from the General Fund and the Fleet Fund. MISSION STATEMENT Public Services is a team of professionals who value integrity, diversity, and equity. We are committed to providing essential municipal services and accessible public spaces for Salt Lake City by investing public funds effectively, efficiently, and sustainably to make life better throughout the community. PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Administrative Services under leadership of the Department Director, provides leadership, project support, strategy, and vision to the department while establishing standards and processes for transparent, accountable, and data- driven solutions that aim to better serve the public and enhance City assets. Administrative Services Division functions include technology implementation, internal and external communications, finance, special projects, information management, strategic planning, and policy and procedure tracking for department management. Compliance is responsible for providing the efficient and effective delivery of the following services: • Enforce City codes relevant to parking,food cart vendors, sidewalk entertainers, and impoundment. • Process customer service requests from residents and business owners. • Enforce vehicle idling violations. • Manage vehicle impound operations with contracted vendor. • Recruit and supervise school crossing guards at State required intersections. • Maintain and service parking pay stations. • Manage operations and access of the Library Parking Garage. Engineering as required by State code, manages all aspects of City-funded construction projects sponsored by other divisions and departments. Engineering is also responsible for data mapping used by internal and external staff, all survey work, controls for subdivisions, and new roadways. 236 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services Facilities is responsible for the stewardship of 83 City-owned buildings, totaling more than 2.54 million square feet and an additional 1.76 million square feet of public plazas, rights-of-way,green ways, and trails in the Downtown and Sugar House business districts. Facilities manages the Capital Asset Program that tracks the condition of each facility, schedules repair and replacement, quantifies deferred capital renewal, and projects costs to preserve assets over their lifetime. Fleet maintains City vehicles and City-owned equipment; provides and monitors fuel at 15 locations; supplies a motor pool; and maintains a truck wash-out facility. Fleet prepares utilization and performance data that is used to optimize the fleet while supporting the City's environmental goals. The division is actively involved in securing a plan for electric infrastructure. Streets is responsible for the following operations: • Repair and apply surface treatments on 1,894 lane miles(approximately 118 million square feet) of City-owned asphalt roadways, including chip, fog, and slurry seal surface treatments, crack sealing, level patching, pothole repair, and asphalt mill-out and inlay. • Upgrade concrete ADA ramps, provide residents and businesses with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drive approach concrete replacement through the 50/50 or 100% cost-share program, and perform sidewalk grinding to mitigate sidewalk trip and fall issues. • Complete concrete joint sealing routine maintenance and limited roadway slab replacement for the City's 189 concrete roadway lane miles. • Control snow and ice on 1,850 lane miles of City-owned roadways. Clear over 5 miles of protected bike lanes on a priority-one basis and snow and ice control on 7.8 miles of viaduct sidewalks. • Maintain over 249 signalized intersections'signals,flashing crosswalks, and electronic traffic control devices on City-maintained roads. • Use specialized painting equipment to apply markings to 608 miles of road surfaces. • Perform annual inspections, installs, and sign maintenance and replacement to 41,652 City traffic signs and 27,962 traffic sign supports. • Provide year-round, after-hours coverage for emergency response through the Streets Response Team.Prevent dirt, leaves, and pollutants from reaching the storm drainage system while providing a clean,well-presented City with street sweeping operations. 237 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Jorge Chamorro,Director Department Performance Measurements Actual Actual Target Target Target COMPLIANCE: maintain full coverage of required school 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% crossings, with crossing guard staff during the school year. ENGINEERING : Number of Public 2,670 2,311 2,300 2,300 2,300 Way Permits Issued FACILITIES: Maintain productivity of 71% 75% 78% 79% 80% total tasks completed on time. FLEET: Maintain mechanic productivity rate during work hours 88% 92% 80% 90% 90% at 90% or greater STREETS: Complete 155 lane miles 144.10 lane 134.83 155 lane 135 lane 115 lane of surface treatments miles lane miles miles miles miles *Target lane miles decreasing due to proposed Mill and Overlay Pilot Program 238 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Jorge Chamorro,Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 26,373,992 32,284,435 34,789,675 O&M 11,531,655 13,444,170 15,412,323 Charges&Services 7,362,578 9,165,506 10,642,856 Capital Expenditures 3,083,205 10,891,354 10,748,547 Interest&Bond Expenditures 3,412,344 3,743,689 3,355,903 Transfers Out 294,931 295,361 654,855 Total Department of Public 52,058,705 69,824,515 75,604,159 Services DIVISION BUDGETS Administrative Services 1,831,658 3,205,861 3,611,447 19.00 Engineering 5,319,272 6,237,533 7,194,606 50.00 Compliance 2,965,595 4,103,432 4,242,524 29.00 Facility Services 9,772,682 10,809,352 11,980,848 57.00 Fleet 19,175,658 30,426,031 32,498,750 46.00 Streets 12,993,839 15,042,306 16,075,984 115.00 Total Department of Public 52,058,705 69,824,515 75,604,159 Services FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 32,883,047 39,398,484 43,105,409 270.00 Fleet Fund 19,175,658 30,426,031 32,498,750 46.00 Total Department of Public 52,058,705 69,824,515 75,604,159 Services FTE by Fiscal Year 294.00 307.00 316.00 239 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services FY 2024 Department Budget Transfers Out Personal Services 654,855 34,789,675 Interest& Bond Expenditures 3,355,903 Capital Expenditures 10,748,547 O & M Charges &Services 15,412,323 10,642,856 240 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Jorge Chamorro,Director Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base to Base Changes (94,561) Base to base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Annualization of Partially Funded Positions 168,015 Annualized funding for those positions added for only a portion of fiscal year 2023. Pension Changes (136,401) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system. Insurance Rate Changes 93,580 This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Department of Public Services as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 29,792 Public Services FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 1,114,688 This increase reflects the Department of Public Services portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 92,027 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair market adjustments. CCAC Salary Adjustments 100,850 The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee(CCAQ Remove New Program Start-up Expenses(One-time) (7,180) The budget reduces funding included in the FY 2023 budget for one-time costs associated with a newly added Sr. Project Manager position in Engineering and a Financial Analyst. FY 2023 BA#4: Sr. Project Manager 160,800 In budget amendment#4 of FY 2023, a Sr. Project Manager position was added to the department. This position will work within the Engineering Division and oversee a program dedicated solely to the proposed bond projects. This position will also be necessary for oversight of design and construction, overall. 241 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services Policy Issues Streets Mill and Overlay Pilot Program (Equipment Funding in CIP) 130,000 The budget includes funding to begin a Mill &Overlay Pilot Program to trial a more robust form of roadway surface treatment. Many existing city roadways do not currently need a full-depth reconstruction but are not in good enough condition for current maintenance surface treatments, namely chip and slurry seal. If no action is taken,these in between roads will rapidly deteriorate and soon require a costly reconstruction. Due to this lack of opportunity for maintenance of these roadway segments, resurfacing candidates will quickly become exhausted.A mill and overlay program will improve the condition of such roads to the point were they are once more eligible for surface treatments, thus extending their life expectancy. The one-time funding for the paver and Planer equipment is included in the CIP. Converting Part-time Office Tech to FTE-Streets — Currently, two new programs are to be implemented at the Streets division: SalesForce and Workday, which provide a more efficient and accessible way for constituents to report issues with their streets. This update is expected to increase the number of such reports.To aid with the rollout and continuous support of these programs, consistent resources are necessary. By converting the existing part-time Office Tech position division support can be better organized while also improving customer service. Contractual Increases/ Inflationary 1,256,000 The Public Services Department has experienced operational expense increases related to inflationary and other contractual price increases. The budget includes funding for cost increases to multiple expense categories related to utilities,fleet fuel, operational contracts, and supplies. Safety&Security Manager(Grade 37)(10 Mths) 152,565 Funding to kickstart a City-wide safety and security program is being recommended.The Safety and Security Director will take control of the security management of all City-occupied building, overseeing the integration of security and access systems, operations, and technologies designed to protect the safety of employees and visitors to public these buildings. In addition,this position will identify and coordinate the delivery of appropriate workplace safety trainings to those Departments that currently don't have a Safety Manager. Environmental Engineer(Grade 33)(10 Mths) 178,000 Based on the joint ownership agreement, Salt Lake City Engineering has provided Engineering services for the City and County's Landfill projects and related environmental regulatory needs. With Engineering's existing and projected workload including multiple large-scale projects on the horizon at the landfill,the need for an additional Professional Engineer dedicated to the Landfill has become evident in order to meet short and long-term needs, as well asjob succession planning. In addition, Sustainability anticipates significant increase for environmental regulatory support, including Fleet Yard remediation planning, Inland Port environmental support, right-of-way environmental assessments, and EPA Brownfields Grant management. The General Fund could see a partial offset of the expense on for this position as the time spent by the new FTE on Landfill projects would be reimbursable to the City by the County, per the joint ownership agreement. 242 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services Building Administrator(10 Mths) 131,750 The addition of this Building Administrator will serve several purposes. First, servicing space needs assessment and office furniture. This service has been contracted out for some time to a part-time on-call architect. This service has been costly and lacking in many areas, as the City spends an average of$80,000/year on these type of contracted services.The space layouts need to be digitized and continually updated and the pipeline of furniture and equipment orders needs to be managed in house.This position will also oversee all services provided to the buildings including: private security, janitorial,vending, special events, event programming, art display, etc. This position will also coordinate the upcoming construction timing, moves and accommodations.This service may also extend to other City offices, such as Plaza 349. 4 New FTEs:Trades Apprenticeship Program 332,000 The budget adds four new FTEs for a Trades Apprenticeship program. For the past decade,the Facilities Division has found it difficult to recruit trades professionals. Each year the recruiting seems to get worse, with little to no success. Facilities is proposing a potential solution to the recruitment challenge, by utilizing the Mayors' apprenticeship funding initiative to grow our own skilled labor pool from the local community through a structured apprenticeship program, building a workforce that truly represents the people whom we serve.With this program,we can also help individuals by developing a fulfilling and flexible career that plays into their interests as they grow different skill sets.All positions will offer hands-on training, real-world experience, and paid educational training. Once fully certified on their trade, these employees will be able to move out of the apprenticeship program and apply for an open position within the City,freeing the position for the next round of apprentices. Public EV Charging Stations Maintenance 45,000 Funding is being moved from the Sustainability department for the maintenance of the public-facing EV charging stations owned by the City(20).This budget allocation also covers the ongoing service fees Engineering AutoCAD Transfer to IMS (22,000) The budget transfers funding for management of AutoCAD from various departments to IMS. Pre-Employment Screening Transfer to HR (18,000) The budget transfers funding for management of the pre-employment screening function from Public Services to Human Resources. 243 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Services This page intentionally left blank 244 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE WATER RESOURCES PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMINISTRATOR Tamara Prue Lisa M.TarufeRi, Laura Briefer, M.P.A. M.B.A. Director Hydrology Customer Service Safety Program Manager Sustainability GRAMA/Records Management Meter Reading Water Conservation Billing Stream Flow Records Communications& Engagement Finance Snow Totals Contracts, Property&Water Rights Management, Policy& Public Affairs ............................................................................ GIS Marian Rice, Administrative Services Watershed Jesse Stewart Engineering MPA, Ph.D. ....................... Street Lighting Deputy Director Water Reclamation Water Quality&Treatment Deputy Director Maintenance Water&Storm Water Quality WATER QUALITY& Engineering Regulatory Compliance TREATMENT ENGINEERING Capital Improvement Cross Connection and Control Jason Brown, P.E. Development Water Treatment Plants Teresa Gray Chief Engineer Design Sewer Pretreatment Administrator Inspection GIS WASTEWATER Locators GIS& IT TREATMENT PLANT Waste Water Treatment Plant Leak Detection Survey Tamara Wambeam Jamey West Pretreatment Program Document Management GIS&IT System Public Utilities Web Water Reclamation Safety Specialist Administrator Manager Billing Program Water Maintenance MAINTENANCE/ Sewer Maintenance OPERATIONS Storm Water Maintenance Jeffrey Grimsdell Distribution Superintendent Telemetering Support Services Warehouse 245 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Department Of Public Utilities DEPARTMENT MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT To serve our community and protect our environment by working to continuously improve water, wastewater, stormwater, and street lighting services in a sustainable manner.We strive to uphold the values of Service, Leadership, Integrity, Flexibility, Efficiency, and Stewardship. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities(SLCDPU) provides water, sewer, stormwater, and street lighting services. SLCDPU provides sewer, stormwater, and street lighting to the approximately 200,000 residents of Salt Lake City.The service area for SLCDPU's water utility is much larger and provides drinking water to more than 360,000 people in Salt Lake City and portions of Mill Creek, Holladay, Cottonwood Heights, Murray, Midvale, and South Salt Lake. SLCDPU manages the four utilities as separate enterprise funds under one administrative management structure. SLCDPU develops and implements fees, rates, and rate structures that are approved annually by the Salt Lake City Council. SLCDPU's work in each of its four utilities is vital to public health, environment, economy, and quality of life. Our 477 employees are responsible to ensure the environment is protected, and that the public has access to clean, reliable, and affordable water resources. SLCDPU is extremely accountable to the public in its implementation of these services. In fulfilling this important responsibility, SLCDPU is regulated by(1)federal and state agencies pursuant to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act, and the state's drinking water and water quality statutes and rules; (2)federal and state statutes regarding water resources,water quality, and flood control; and (3) local health department regulations concerning drinking water and wastewater. SLCDPU, in turn, enforces numerous regulations concerning water, stormwater, and sewer, primarily contained in Chapter 17 of Salt Lake City's ordinances. SLCDPU is also responsible for regulating the Riparian Corridor Overlay Zone found in Chapter 21 of Salt Lake City's ordinances. 246 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Laura Briefer M.P.A.,Director Department Performance Measurements Measure i Water Quality: Water Quality Turbidity is a measure of water clarity by indicating how cloudy it is. The 0.02 NTU 0.03 NTU 0.0282 NTU <0.03 NTU <0.03 NTU national benchmark is less than 0.1 Nephelometric Turbidity Units(NTU). Energy Use:AWWA Water-Energy Efficiency median is 6,881 thousand 2,024 Kbtu/ 1,902 Kbtu/ 2607 Kbtu/ 1,840 Kbtu/ 1,840 Kbtu/ British thermal units per year per yr/MG yr/MG yr/MG yr/MG yr/MG million gallons(Kbtu/yr./MG). Water Use:Average Per Capita Water Use in Gallons per Capita per Day 172 gpcd 193 gpcd 166 gpcd <200 gpcd <200 gpcd (gpcd as of 12/31). Sewer: Clean greater than 35% of the 59% of 45% of 45% of >35% of >35% of sewer collection system. System System System System System Stormwater: Linear feet(LF) of lines 13,295 LF 13,541 LF 18,935 LF 21,700 LF* 21,700 LF* replaced, rehabilitated, or installed. *Target based on annual CIP planning. 247 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Laura Briefer M.P.A.,Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 38,350,650 49,027,442 54,251,832 O&M 6,661,002 8,737,209 9,761,269 Charges&Services 47,122,600 64,446,316 68,863,756 Interest&Bond Expense 12,094,845 29,255,463 41,267,908 Capital Expenditures 137,430,538 261,074,907 334,049,662 Transfers Out — 583,605 583,605 Total Department of Public Utilities 241,659,635 413,124,942 508,778,032 DIVISION BUDGETS Administration 6,183,609 7,960,801 9,029,919 20.00 Finance 16,672,727 26,841,436 29,806,655 51.00 Engineering 4,441,071 7,968,759 8,892,320 53.00 Water Quality 30,566,384 35,028,903 36,445,186 58.00 Water Reclamation 9,677,804 12,724,122 14,065,437 71.00 Water Resources 1,415,072 2,196,676 2,915,791 12.00 Maintenance 20,796,880 26,660,319 28,448,446 186.00 GIS 2,396,256 3,413,556 3,856,308 24.00 CIP and Debt Service 149,509,833 290,330,370 375,317,970 Total Department of Public Utilities 241,659,635 413,124,942 508,778,032 FUNDING SOURCES Street Lighting Fund 4,239,497 5,757,825 6,044,149 2.57 Water Fund 113,694,347 132,752,815 177,953,787 298.21 Sewer Fund 113,015,365 255,914,580 301,832,622 130.80 Storm Water Fund 10,710,425 18,699,722 22,947,474 43.42 Total Department of Public Utilities 241,659,635 413,124,942 508,778,032 FTE by Fiscal Year 452.00 459.00 475.00 248 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities FY 2023 Department Budget O & M 9,761,269 Charges &Services 68,863,756 Personal Services 54,251,832 AkI Interest& Bond Expense 41,267,908 Transfers Out 583,605 Capital Expenditures 334,049,662 249 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 250 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 00 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Director OFFICE MANAGER GALLIVAN DIRECTOR RDA :....................... ......................: Deputy Director OFFICE GALLIVAN STAFF FACILITATOR (13 POSITIONS) ............................................................................................................................................................................... SR. PROJECT SR. PROJECT Comm/ FINANCIAL MNGR MNGR OUTREACH ANALYST MANAGER COMM/ SR. PROJECT PROJECT SR. PROJECT PROPERTY OUTREACH DATA MNGR MNGR MNGR MNGR COORDINATOR MANAGER PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT SPECIAL MNGR COORD MNGR COORD PROJECTS 251 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Of Salt Lake City DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT AND CORE VALUES The mission of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City(RDA) is to revitalize neighborhoods and business districts to improve livability, spark economic growth, and foster authentic communities, serving as a catalyst for strategic development projects that enhance the City's housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. We foster a set of core values that collectively support the revitalization of Salt Lake City's communities: ECONOMIC GROWTH//We act as a responsible steward of public funds,taking a long-term view of investment, return, and property values. COMMUNITY IMPACT//We prioritize projects and programs that demonstrate commitment to improving equity and quality of life for residents and businesses in Salt Lake City. NEIGHBORHOOD VIBRANCY//We cultivate distinct and livable built environments that are contextually sensitive, resilient, connected, and sustainable. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Since 1969,the RDA has played a pivotal role in revitalizing many areas of Salt Lake City. Under the Utah Community Development and Renewal Agencies Act,the RDA has the charge and financial tools to address blight and disinvestment in specific parts of the City. By working with communities and development partners, the RDA is transforming areas suffering from social, environmental, physical, or economic challenges into neighborhoods and commercial districts that are characterized by a variety of useful amenities,vital housing opportunities, successful local businesses, connected public spaces, renewed infrastructure, and public art.As the owner of the Gallivan Center,the RDA also works with the adjacent property owners to oversee the maintenance and programming of the 3.5-acre downtown plaza. To accomplish its goals to enhance livability and trigger economic investment,the RDA utilizes a robust set of financial, planning, and revitalization tools to support redevelopment within communities throughout the City. The RDA achieves its goals through direction from its RDA Board of Directors (the same members as the Salt Lake City Council)and is administered by its Executive Director(Salt Lake City Mayor).Together with the Gallivan Center,the RDA has a total of 34 positions led by the Director and Deputy Director.The staff conducts the daily operations of the RDA as well as the maintenance and operations of the Gallivan Center. 252 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Danny Walz,Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 1,588,385 2,480,095 2,756,779 O&M 4,255,374 1,300,000 1,375,000 Charges&Services 18,217,392 22,452,621 20,099,135 Interest&Bond Expense 9,057,549 10,746,989 9,599,991 Capital Expenditures 6,726,761 14,278,181 24,972,594 Transfers Out — 12,043,013 16,274,328 Total RDA $ 39,845,461 $ 63,300,899 $ 75,077,827 DIVISION BUDGETS Administration 3,193,068 3,998,655 4,428,662 21.00 Block 70 1,803,909 10,915,154 11,053,759 Central Business District 24,008,621 27,596,650 24,644,694 Primary Housing Fund(CWH TI) — 1,599,880 2,394,582 Depot District 2,123,789 4,049,587 7,227,908 Granary District 644 648,546 1,394,593 Housing Development Fund — 5,230,000 4,510,953 North Temple 224,914 449,053 1,351,992 No Temple Viaduct 2,542,885 1,206,609 2,774,419 Northwest Quadrant — 908,100 1,398,548 Westside Community Initiative(NWQ Hsg/UIPA) — 500,000 1,835,469 Program Income Fund 1,432,032 1,556,835 1,449,692 Secondary Housing Fund(PAH) 16,478 10,000 1,000,000 Revolving Loan Fund 937,335 345,000 226,750 Stadler Rail — 72,920 141,297 State Street — 2,631,183 5,788,520 9-Line 234,503 1,477,727 3,455,989 West Capitol Hill 1,491,383 100,000 — West Temple Gateway 1,835,900 5,000 — Total RDA $ 39,845,461 $ 63,300,899 $ 75,077,827 FUNDING SOURCES Redevelopment Agency Fund 70,206,571 63,300,899 75,077,827 21.00 Total RDA $ 70,206,571 $ 63,300,899 $ 75,077,827 FTE by Fiscal Year 19.00 19.00 21.00 253 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City FY 2024 DEPT BUDGET Capital Expenditures 24,972,594 Transfers Out 16,274,328 Personal Services 2,756,779 Interest& Bond Expense O & M 9,599,991 1,375,000 Charges &Services 20,099,135 254 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 NS FINANCE& ACCOUNTING ......... SUSTAINABILITY Angie Nielsen DEPARTMENT Financial Manager Debbie Lyons Budget Development Director Accounting&Reporting Financial Analysis Carbon Data Accounting .................................:................................ Financial Forecasting WASTE& RECYCLING ENVIRONMENT& ENERGY Chris Bell Sophia Nicholas Division Director Deputy Director Zero Waste Planning&Policy Budget&Policy Recycling Air Quality Refuse Collection Environmental Compliance Curbside Compost Collection Climate Change Call-2-Haul Program Energy Glass Recycling Food Security Education &Enforcement Communications&Public Special Events Waste& Relations Recycling Grant Management Construction& Demolition E2 Business Program Waste Permits Master Recycler Program 255 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability Sustainability Department Overview VISION STATEMENT The Sustainability Department supports the vision of leading the way on resilience and environmental stewardship. MISSION STATEMENT The Sustainability Department develops goals and strategies to protect our natural resources, reduce pollution, slow climate change, and establish a path toward greater equity, resiliency, and empowerment for the community. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Department of Sustainability aims to develop goals and strategies to protect our natural resources, reduce pollution, slow climate change, and establish a path toward greater resiliency and vitality for all aspects of our community.The Department is organized in two separate divisions: the Waste & Recycling Division and the Environment& Energy Division.The Waste & Recycling Division is responsible for managing the City's regular refuse, compost, and recycling collection services and is funded by refuse collection fees. The Environment& Energy Division develops plans and policies to preserve and improve our built and natural environments and provide residents information on sustainability issues affecting Salt Lake City.This division is funded primarily by landfill dividends and recycling proceeds when available. The Department currently operates with 63 full- time equivalent positions(FTE's)and is requesting two additional FTEs in FY24. Department Performance Measurement Measure 202OActual 2021Actuall 2022Actuali Increase percent of residential waste stream diverted from the landfill 39.29% 37.2% 37% >_40% >_40% through recycling and composting 50% renewable electricity generation for municipal 13%(est.) 12% (est) 12% >_50% >_50% operations by 2023 100% renewable electricity generation for community by 22%(est.) 30% 31% >_30% >_30% 2030 Reduce community greenhouse gas emissions 4,498,525 (est.) 4,720,000(est.) 4,620,000(est.) <_4,620,000 <_4,620,000 MTCO e MTCO e MTCO e MTCO e MTCO 80% by 2040 z z z z ze SLCGreen Total social media followers(IN STAG RAM, 17,624 18,254 18,823 20,250 20,350 Facebook, and Twitter) 256 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT Debbie Lyons,Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Budget Recommended FY 2023-24 FTE Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 5,430,578 6,029,059 6,752,544 O&M 289,453 278,599 633,100 Charges&Services 7,355,717 10,052,438 9,722,684 Interest&Bond Expense 1,978,827 2,578,871 2,986,397 Capital Expenditures 2,775,464 5,738,704 8,124,067 Transfers Out 277,196 275,000 275,000 Total Sustainability 18,107,234 24,952,671 28,493,792 Department DIVISION BUDGETS Environment&Energy 1,485,545 3,414,392 2,876,630 8.00 Waste&Recycling 16,621,689 21,538,279 25,617,162 57.00 Total Sustainability 18,107,234 24,952,671 28,493,792 Department FUNDING SOURCES Refuse Fund 18,107,234 24,952,671 28,493,792 65.00 Total Sustainability 18,107,234 24,952,671 28,493,792 Department FTE by Fiscal Year 63.00 63.00 65.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Personal Services O & M 6,752,544 633,100 Transfers Out 275,000 Charges &Services 9,722,684 Capital Expenditures )I 8,124,067 Interest& Bond Expense 2,986,397 257 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 258 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau SALT LAKE CITY 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24 C7 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU Stephen Meyer Director Lisa Kehoe Deputy Director .................................................................. Racheal"Shelly" Elizabeth"Betsy" Dejong Delka Operations Manager Operations Manager Kelli Wallin Operations Manager 259 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau 911 Dispatch Bureau DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT We will strive to partner with our officers and firefighters to create a safe and healthy community where our citizens can work and live. DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT Salt Lake City 911 will maintain a high state of readiness to provide a caring and committed link between our officers,firefighters, and citizens of Salt Lake City. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The 911 Communications Bureau provides dispatch services for Salt Lake City and Sandy City residents. They process all emergent and non-emergent calls in both municipalities. The dispatchers work cooperatively with the Fire Departments and Police Departments that they serve and Sandy Animal Services to address the needs of the public. The 911 Bureau is managed by an at-will director that reports to the Office of the Mayor. The total FTEs for the 911 Communications Bureau stands at 100.The majority of these FTEs answer calls 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, and answered over 780,000 calls last year.These specialized dispatchers require rigorous training each year and are held to high standards of quality response. 911 Communications Bureau Performance Measures Performance Measures i Actual 2021 Answer phones within 15 seconds at least 95.24% of the 98.03% 95.24% 95.34% 95.24% 96.00% time Answer phones within 40 seconds at least 98.47% of the 99.33% 98.47% 98.19% 98.47% 99.00% time *911 Comm gathers performance measurement information on a calendar year basis. 26o Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau SALT LAKE CITY 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU Stephen Meyer,Director FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2023-24 Actuals Adopted Recommended FTE Budget Budget DEPARTMENT BUDGET Personal Services 8,176,089 9,701,207 10,088,793 O& M 71,901 84,984 84,984 Charges&Services 572,901 935,576 935,606 Capital Expenditures — 150,373 150,373 Total 911 Communications Bureau 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 DIVISION BUDGETS City Administration 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 100.00 Total 911 Communications Bureau 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 FUNDING SOURCES General Fund 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 100.00 Total 911 Communications Bureau 8,820,891 10,872,140 11,259,756 FTE by Fiscal Year 108.00 100.00 100.00 FY 2024 Department Budget Capital Expenditures 150,373 Charges &Services 935,606 O & M Personal Services 84,984 10,088,793 261 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau SALT LAKE CITY 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU Stephen Meyer,Director Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2022-23 adopted budget. Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes (87,116) Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2023 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2023. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefit changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year. Pension Changes (51,620) The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System. Insurance Rate Changes 30,216 This increase reflects a change in insurance costs for the 911 Communication Bureau as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book. Merit Changes 97,922 The 911 Communication Bureau FY2024 scheduled increases for all represented employees covered under an MOU. Employees included are AFSCME 100, 200 &330 series employees; Fire 400 &901 series employees; and Police 500 series employees. Salary Proposal 396,453 This increase reflects the 911 Communication Bureaus portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book. Annualization of NFP Adjustments 1,761 Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair-market value. These salary increases were not implemented until October 1 st, a delay of three months. The Mayor recommends an increase to accommodate full year funding of these fair-market adjustments. 262 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental NON-DEPARTMENTAL General Fund Requests Overview FY 2022-23 Adopted FY 2023-24 FY 2021-22 Actuals Budget Recommended Budget Governmental Transactions 10 Year Plan-Airport Trail Reimbursement Required 103,887 103,887 by FAA Corrective Action Plan Retirement Payouts 390,000 696,000 696,000 Contract with U of U for Demographic Project - 50,000 50,000 Sorenson Center w/County 1,729,751 1,014,800 1,014,800 Jordan River Membership 16,000 14,000 16,000 Washington DC Consultant - 75,000 75,000 Tuition Aid Program 193,500 320,000 320,000 Municipal Elections 178,697 20,000 354,551 Animal Services Contract 1,874,652 1,968,385 1,970,648 Police Department Body Cameras 1,508,886 1,549,692 1,549,692 Apprenticeship Program 5,792 1,025,000 630,000 City Resident Bus Pass(HIVE) 416,167 1,321,000 411,000 Free Bus Passes for School Children(Expansion of 100,000 HIVE) Federal Grant Match Account - 1,000,000 - Governmental Transactions Total 6,417,332 9,157,764 7,187,691 Inter-Governmental Transfers Public Utilities- Land Swap Payment - 200,000 200,000 Capital Improvements Project Fund 22,541,701 20,037,135 12,834,010 Transfer to Debt Service Fund 8,585,180 11,417,321 10,301,526 Fire SCBA 210,000 197,400 197,400 Fleet Replacement Fund 10,710,986 11,711,900 11,743,350 Transfer to RDA 16,126,056 15,532,420 15,985,753 Transfer to Golf 1,889,528 182,795 Golf(Living Wage and CCAC Salary Adjustment - 370,100 370,100 Transfer Golf Fund ESCO FY 2023 - 484,000 - Golf Fund ESCO FY 2024 - - 510,427 Golf Admin Fee Transfer 315,779 356,302 Golf IMS Transfer 200,000 350,000 Rosepark Infrastructure Renewal - 500,000 500,000 Transfer to Water Fund - 100,000 200,000 Housing Sales Tax Plan(Transfer to the Housing - 2,590,000 2,590,000 Fund) Transfer to Governmental Immunity 2,767,963 - - IFAS Account IMS Transfer - 780,069 - General Fund Costs for Streetlighting 102,610 184,420 184,420 Sustainability Fund Transfer 440,000 1,712,126 1,400,900 Special Revenue Fund: Environmental Assessment - 100,000 100,000 Fund 263 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Adopted FY 2023-24 FY 2021-22 Actuals Budget Recommended Budget Special Revenue Fund: Emergency Demolition - 200,000 Revolving Fund (One-time) Inter-Governmental Transfers Total 63,374,024 66,815,465 57,824,188 Interfund Charges Information Management Services Fund 13,490,743 17,586,526 22,166,515 Risk Management Premium 2,712,793 3,125,591 3,911,485 Centralized Fleet Management 6,754,891 6,938,939 7,656,893 Interfund Charges Total 22,958,427 27,651,056 33,734,893 Municipal Contributions&Civic Support Salt Lake City Arts Council 650,000 800,000 800,000 Legal Defenders 1,292,774 1,404,677 1,523,067 SL Area Chamber of Commerce 50,000 50,000 55,000 Sugar House Park Authority 224,795 224,795 270,251 Diversity Outreach - 3,000 3,000 Utah League of Cities and Towns 195,097 183,563 233,474 National League of Cities and Towns 12,422 11,535 12,797 Tracy Aviary 674,922 719,367 763,526 Sister Cities - 10,000 10,000 ACE Fund(Previously Signature Events) 206,000 200,000 200,000 Dignitary Gifts/Receptions/Employee Appreciation 16,960 20,000 170,000 Housing Authority Transitional Housing 109,809 85,000 85,000 Regional Economic Development Funding 108,000 108,000 108,000 US Conference of Mayors - 12,242 12,242 Local Business Marketing Program - 20,000 20,000 Utah Legislative/Local Lobby- Moved to Mayor's 6,729 - - Office in 2020 Music Licensing Fees 2,167 7,000 9,000 Billboard Purchase 50,000 - - Utah Foundation 10,000 - - Rape Recovery Center 30,000 30,000 30,000 YWCA-FJC Wrap Around Services 45,000 45,000 45,000 Council - Dignitary Gifts Rece 5,000 - - Citywide Equity Plan and Training 72,389 - - Wind Storm Damage 678,088 - - Right of Way Repair from Wind Storm 6,897 - - DAQ Lawnmower Exchange 160,886 - - National League of Cities Conference (297,129) - - Boards&Commission Honoraria - 26,000 26,000 Salt Lake City Foundation 3,000 3,000 3,000 World Trade Center Membership 50,000 50,000 50,000 City County Building Branding(One-time) - 75,000 - Suazo Membership 18,750 75,000 45,000 Downtown Alliance Safety Ambassador 495,000 - - 264 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Adopted FY 2023-24 FY 2021-22 Actuals Budget Recommended Budget Gentrification Mitigation Study 103,151 — — Housing Assistance Program- Rental Assistance 128,772 — — Housing Assistance Program- Mortgage Assistance 23,420 — — Healthcare Innovation- Biohive — 85,000 135,000 Shooting Range Remediation — 500,000 — NBA All Star Game — 1,000,000 — Switchpoint Donation 1,000,000 — — Switchpoint Donation- FOF 1,000,000 — — Open Streets Initiative — 150,000 City Hall Security — 1,200,000 280,350 Transportation Utility Fee Consultant — — 50,000 Wasatch Community Gardens — — 50,000 Salary Negotiation Holding Account 299,573 — 760,000 Municipal Contributions&Civic Support Total 7,432,472 7,098,179 5,749,707 Police Department and Racial Equity in Policing Funding Commission on Racial Equity in Policing — 120,000 120,000 Police Training 946 205,400 55,000 Police Department Social Worker Funding 1,343,055 1,069,127 1,840,127 FOF Police Department Social Worker Funding — 1,431,390 — Racial Equity in Policing Commission Peer Court 20,000 20,000 20,000 Racial Equity in Policing Holding Account — 1,781,192 1,781,192 Racial Equity in Policing Comm Cost 56,183 Police Department and Racial Equity in Policing 1,420,183 4,627,109 3,816,319 Funding Total Sales Tax Option:Transit Plans Transit Key Routes(1,2,9&21) 5,107,821 6,600,000 7,000,000 On-Demand Ride Services 1,013,389 1,900,000 3,000,000 Outreach New Routes 37,060 100,000 100,000 Sales Tax Option:Transit Plan Total 6,158,270 8,600,000 10,100,000 General Fund Total 107,760,708 123,949,573 118,412,798 Special Revenue Fund Accounting CDBG Operating Funds 6,470,520 4,958,433 5,597,763 Downtown SID/CBID&Other 1,557,197 1,700,000 1,700,000 Salt Lake City Donation Fund 2,252,760 2,870,250 500,000 E911 Fund 3,691,166 3,800,385 3,800,385 Housing Loans and Trust 31,343,897 25,779,254 955,000 Miscellaneous Grants 41,916,856 26,614,153 7,390,097 Other Special Revenue 306,980 300,000 400,000 Total Special Revenue Fund Accounting 87,539,376 66,022,475 20,343,245 265 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Adopted FY 2023-24 FY 2021-22 Actuals Budget Recommended Budget Debt Service Funds Debt Service Funds 60,679,751 33,658,558 34,894,979 Special Improvement District Funds 911 3,000 3,000 Total Debt Service Funds 60,680,662 33,661,558 34,897,979 Capital Projects Funds Capital Projects Fund 38,951,338 35,460,387 29,034,160 Impact Fees 7,738,575 — — Capital Projects Maintenance Fund 2,577,746 — — Total Capital Projects Funds 49,267,660 35,460,387 29,034,160 FY 2022-23 Adopted FY 2023-24 Funding Sources FY 2021-22 Actuals Budget Recommended Budget General Fund 107,760,708 123,949,573 118,412,798 Special Improvement Districts Funds 911 3,000 3,000 Miscellaneous Special Service District Fund 1,557,197 1,700,000 1,700,000 Emergency 911 3,691,166 3,800,385 3,800,385 CDBG Operating Fund 6,470,520 4,958,433 5,597,763 Misc Grants Operating Funds 41,916,856 26,614,153 7,390,097 Salt Lake City Donation Fund 2,252,760 2,870,250 500,000 Other Special Revenue Funds 306,980 300,000 400,000 Housing Funds 31,343,897 25,779,254 955,000 Debt Service Funds 60,679,751 33,658,558 34,894,979 Capital Projects Fund 38,951,338 35,460,387 29,034,160 Impact Fees Fund 7,738,575 Capital Projects Maintenance Fund 2,577,746 — — 305,248,406 259,093,993 202,688,182 266 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental NON-DEPARTMENTAL General Fund Requests Overview The Non-departmental portion of the budget provides a financial reporting and budgeting section to account for all General Fund monies transferred to other funds,grants, and other special revenue funds. It provides accounting for funds that do not programmatically belong to any particular City department. It includes an accounting of the City's debt service and capital improvement programs. It is also used to monitor disbursements of monies for civic organizations that provide a service on behalf of Salt Lake City but are not legal entities of the City. Apprenticeship Program (395,000) This amount has been transferred to Public Services for a full-time apprenticeship program and to Wasatch Gardens. Employee Appreciation 150,000 Funding is being requested for employee appreciation activities and gifts. How the funding is used will primarily be determined by the City's Employee Appreciation Board. City Hall Security Improvements(Remove One-time) (933,000) One-time funding for security improvements to the City County Building was included in the FY 2023 budget. The funding will be removed in this budget. City Hall Police Presence 13,350 The budget includes a 5% increase in funding for the contract that provides a Police presence in City Hall. City Resident Bus Pass(HIVE) (810,000) Hive participation is down. A portion of this is has a revenue offset. Federal Grant Match Account (1,000,000) Budget was set aside in FY 2023 for grants applied for under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This budget removes the funding set-aside. Contract for Animal Services 2,263 The amount required by the County for Animal Services will increase based on the contract. Jordan River Commission Membership 2,000 The budget includes an increase in funding for the City's Jordan River Commission Membership. Municipal Election Costs 284,551 The budget includes $244,551 for the cost of the contract with the County for the upcoming municipal election. There is also $40,000 included for ranked choice voting awareness. Oath of Office and Outgoing Elected Official Events 50,000 $30,000 is included to cover the cost of the upcoming oath of office event scheduled following the election. There is also $20,000 for and outgoing elected official event. Transportation Utility Fee Consultant(One-time) 50,000 The Transportation Utility Fee(TUF) is a fee allowed by State Statue. The formula and calculations to charge this fee are complex. A consultant will provide the expertise needed to help us get accurate information. Debt Service Funding Transfer 58,230 Debt Service transfer is lower due to the LBA Debt Service being paid with Fire Impact fees. CIP Funding Transfer (7,203,125) The CIP funding transfer is being reduced by$7,203,125 primarily due to the removal of one-time funding for the restoration of the City County Building following the earthquake and a one-time set- aside for hand held radios. An additional reduction of$2,000,000 is due to repurposing parks maintenance CIP funding toward parks maintenance staffing, supplies and vehicles to address the needs of the City's growing Parks and Public Lands Capital Assets. 267 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental Fleet Replacement Fund Transfer 31,450 The budget includes a slight increase in the fleet replacement fund transfer due to an increase in the cost of the vehicles being purchased for new positions. Centralized Fleet Maintenance 717,954 An increase in funding for fleet maintenance is due to increased costs of parts, equipment and labor. Golf Fund Transfer 34,155 The transfer to the Golf fund will increase to cover the increased cost of the annual ESCO payment and an increase in the Admin Fee transfer. IMS Fund Transfer 3,799,920 The IMS fund transfer is increasing for several reasons. There are approximately$1.3 million in increases contractual and inflationary costs, approximately$1.15 million for IMS personnel and new personnel costs, and $186,914 for costs associated with IMS related costs for new general fund positions. There is also a $1.27 million increase for functions currently housed in general fund departments being transferred to IMS. These include Versaterm,the radio system, PSB printer maintenance, new capital asset planning software for the Finance department,Autocad and Zoom Enterprise Software. Insurance and Risk Management 785,894 This increase is for Risk Administrative Fees and the new Life Savings Account. Public Utilities Water Usage Study 100,000 Funding is being requested for a water audit for Salt Lake City facilities, both indoor and outdoor. This will be done through a contract with a commercial institutional industrial auditor. RDA Tax Increment Transfer 453,333 The pass through transfer from the General Fund to the RDA Fund is increasing by a total of $453,333. Emergency Demolition Fund Revolving Fund (Removing One-time Funding) (200,000) Funding was included in the FY 2023 budget as seed money to create a revolving fund to act as an insurance policy to allow the Fire Marshall to condemn a building and order its demolition to help prevent injury or death should the structure be used inappropriately. The funding will be removed in this budget. Sustainability Fund Transfer (311,226) Funding for a transfer to Sustainability(Refuse Fund) is included in the budget. Details of how this funding will be utilized are contained in the Sustainability section of the book. Racial Equity in Policing: Police Officer Training(Removing One-time Funding) (150,400) Funding for Racial Equity in Policing related officer training will be removed in this budget. Racial Equity in Policing: Social Worker Program 60,536 Salary and benefit increase for Social Workers. Racial Equity in Policing: Increased Mental Health Responders 121,074 Salary and benefit increase for Mental Health Responders. Diversifying Public Safety Civilian Response Models Holding Account Reduction (842,000) The budget remaining in the Diversifying Public Safety Civilian Response Models Holding Account is being reduced. Racial Equity in Policing: Holding Account — The Racial Equity in Policing holding account budget is being moved from the General Fund to the General Fund (FOF). Transit Plan -Service for Key Routes 400,000 Inflationary increase in costs associated with the current routes. Transit Plan - On Demand Ride Services(Smaller Service Area) 1,100,000 The On Demand Ride Service is in high demand.This amount will help us step up to meet the requested demand. 268 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Non-Departmental Remove City County Building Branding(One-time) (75,000) Funding is being included to make the signage in the City building more consistent and to remove the references to the County. Healthcare Innovation - Biohive(BA#6) 50,000 Funding is being requested to further grow the strategic partnership opportunities in the local health care industry. This may include collaborative efforts alongside industry partners to brand the industry and highlight opportunities within underserved communities. Legal Defenders 118,390 An increase in funding for the Legal Defenders contract is being included in the budget. Music Licensing Fees 2,000 The cost of music licensing fees has seen an overall increase. Funding is included for this additional cost. National League of Cities and Towns 1,262 An increase is included for the National League of Cities and Towns membership fees. Remove One-time NBA All Star Game Funding (1,000,000) Funding was included in FY 2023 for efforts surrounding the NBA All Star Game, including Police staffing, street barricades, Fire and Emergency Management staffing, city-wide marketing and Parks and Lands related costs. The funding is being removed in this budget. Remove Open Streets Initiative One-time Funding (150,000) Funding that was provided in FY 2023 for the Open Streets Initiative which temporarily closed Main Street from South Temple to 400 South on Fridays and Saturdays from May to September of 2022 is being reduced in this budget. Salary Contingency 760,000 Funding is being set aside for potential anticipated salary items. SL Area Chamber of Commerce 5,000 The budget includes an increase in funding the the Salt Lake Area Chamber of Commerce membership dues. Remove One-time Shooting Range Remediation Funding (500,000) The one-time funding provided for remediation of the old shooting range will be reduced in this budget. Remove One-time Hispanic Entrepreneurs Program Funding (30,000) Funding included in the FY 2023 budget for research to help Salt Lake City better understand the barriers Latino/Hispanic entrepreneurs face when working with City departments will be reduced in this budget. Sugar House Park Authority 45,456 The budget includes funding for the Sugar House Park Authority including a 5% CPI increase for operations and maintenance as well as a $34,216 one-time contribution toward a pavilion replacement. Tracy Avia ry 44,159 Funding is being included for a requested 6.5% CPI increase for staff and operational costs. Utah League of Cities and Towns Membership 49,911 An increase in dues required for the Utah League of Cities and Towns Membership is being included in the budget. Wasatch Community Gardens-Apprentice Gardner(from Apprentice Funding) 50,000 This funding is to help with salaries for the people that will be employed and trained through this program. 269 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 This page intentionally left blank 270 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Staffing Document 46 rJ�. •�.tifa • , This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Staffing Document Official Staffing Document Summary for Fiscal Year 2023-24 This section reflects the official staffing document for FY 2023-24.The staffing document inventories individual positions and pay grade classifications within each division. It includes the total number of authorized positions and job classifications for each department by division and fund.The total number of all positions in the City is tallied on the initial summary page. Any change made to the City staffing document that increased costs but did not increase the number of positions was presented to the City Council for review.Any change in the total number of positions requires the approval of the City Council. The total numbers of positions are presented for the last two fiscal years(2021-22 and 2022-23), as well as the staffing level for FY 2023-24. Changes from the previous fiscal year's budget are noted and explained in the column entitled Changes from FY 2022-23 to FY 2023-24. Changes are noted as follows: RECLASSIFICATIONS • If a reclassification resulted in a pay grade change only, the notation would be, for example, Changed to /from 29 • If a reclassification resulted in a change of title only,the notation would be, for example, Changed to /from Personnel Director. • If a reclassification resulted in a change of grade and title,the notation would be,for example, Changed to /from Personnel Director(29) REORGANIZATIONS • If a position or part of a position has been transferred to a different part of the organization the notation would be,for example, Transferred to /from Employee Services. • If a percentage of the position were transferred,the notation would be,for example, .25 Transferred to /from Employee Services. • If a position or percentage of a position were transferred to another department,the notation would be,for example, Transferred to Department of , Division of /from Employee Services. • There will be offsetting notations in the receiving area of the organization to explain from where the position or percentage of the position was transferred. NEW POSITIONS • A position which has been added to the official staffing document in Fiscal Year 2023-24 is noted as New Position. 273 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document ELIMINATED POSITIONS • A position which has been removed from the official staffing document for the FY 2023-24 is noted as Position eliminated. POSITION HELD VACANT • A position which is being held vacant in the official staffing document for the fiscal year 2023-24 is noted as Position held vacant. POSITION TITLE ABBREVIATIONS • H indicates an hourly position • PT indicates a part-time position • S indicates a seasonal position 274 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document STAFFING DOCUMENT SUMMARY COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS 2022 THROUGH 2O24 Budget Budget Budget FY23-24 DEPARTMENT FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Variance GENERAL FUND Attorney's Office 55.25 58.50 62.50 3.25 City Council 35.00 36.00 36.00 1.00 911 Communications Bureau 108.00 100.00 100.00 (8.00) Community and Neighborhood 176.00 190.00 195.00 14.00 Economic Development 18.00 22.00 22.00 4.00 Department of Finance 71.70 76.70 81.70 5.00 Fire 374.00 392.00 402.00 18.00 Human Resources 26.05 31.40 33.40 5.35 Justice Courts 42.00 42.00 42.00 0.00 Mayor's Office 30.00 32.00 34.00 2.00 Police 720.00 750.00 761.00 30.00 Public Lands 112.35 138.35 157.85 26.00 Public Services 249.00 261.00 270.00 12.00 Non Departmental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GENERAL FUND TOTAL 2,017.35 2,129.95 2,197.45 112.60 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Airport 610.80 619.30 639.30 8.50 Golf 33.65 33.65 34.15 0.00 Public Utilities Street Lighting 2.72 2.72 2.57 0.00 Water 283.16 288.16 298.21 5.00 Sewer 126.55 127.65 130.80 1.10 Storm Water 39.57 40.47 43.42 0.90 Total Public Utilities 452.00 459.00 475.00 7.00 Sustainability 63.00 63.00 65.00 0.00 ENTERPRISE FUND TOTAL 1,159.45 1,174.95 1,213.45 15.50 INTERNAL SERVICE AND OTHER FUNDS Information Mgmt Svcs 84.00 92.00 100.00 8.00 Fleet Management 45.00 46.00 46.00 1.00 Government Immunity 9.00 9.00 7.00 0.00 Risk Management 7.75 7.70 8.70 (0.05) Special Revenue: 1/4 Sales Tax from County 3.00 0.00 0.00 (3.00) INTERNAL SERVICE AND OTHER FUND TOTAL 148.75 154.70 161.70 5.95 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 32.00 32.00 34.00 2.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 3,357.55 3,491.60 3,606.60 136.05 275 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 OFFICE OF • OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL City Council Council Person xxx 7.00 7.00 7.00 Executive Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 ge Deputy Director City Council 39 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Chan d from Associate Deputy Director Council (37) Legislative&Policy Manager 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Senior Advisor City Council(37) Senior Advisor City Council 37 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Legislative&Policy Manager(37) Associate Deputy Director-Council 37 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Deputy Director City Council (39) Senior Public Policy Analyst 33 2.00 2.00 2.00 Operations Mgr/Mentor 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Community Facilitator 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Policy Analyst II 31 3.00 3.00 3.00 Council Office Communication Director 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Policy Analyst 31 1.00 0.00 0.00 Policy Analyst/Public Engagement 28 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Public Engagement&Comm Specialist(26) Public Engage/Comm Specialist II 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Constituent Liaison/Public Policy 27 2.00 2.00 3.00 Changed from Council Admin Asst(24) Analyst Public Engagement&Comm Special 26 2.00 3.00 5.00 Changed from Policy Analyst/Public Engagement(28) Constituent Liaison 26 2.00 3.00 3.00 Assistant to Council Executive Director 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Council Admin Asst 24 5.00 5.00 4.00 RPT Council Staff Asst 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 35.00 36.00 36.00 OFFICE OF •R OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor Executive Staff Mayor xxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 Chief of Staff 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Chief Administrative Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Chief of Staff 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer 39 0.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Advisor 39 2.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to Mayor Policy Advisors Communications Director 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Mayor Communication Communications Deputy Director 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Mayor Communication Policy Advisor 29 2.00 2.00 1.00 1 Transferred to Mayor CommunityOutreach,1 Changed to Senior Advisor(39) REP Commission Senior Staff Position 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Mayor Equity Administration 276 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Community Liaison 26 5.00 5.00 0.00 4 Transferred to Community Outreach, 1 Transferred to CAN - BA#3 Executive Assistant 24 4.00 5.00 3.00 1 Transferred to Mayor Equity Administration, 1 Transferred to Mayor Community Outreach Office Manager Mayor's Office 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Community Outreach Sp&E Coord 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Mayor Community Outreach Communication &Content Mgr 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Mayor Communication Administrative Assistant 19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Mayor Executive Staff Total 25.00 27.00 12.00 Mayor Communication Communications Director 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Communications Deputy Director 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Communication &Content Mgr 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff, Grade changed from 21 to 30 Mayor Communication Total 0.00 0.00 3.00 Mayor Policy Advisors New Division Senior Advisor 39 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Mayor Policy Advisors Total 0.00 0.00 2.00 Mayor Equity Administration Chief Equity Officer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 REP Commission Senior Staff Position 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Equity Team Member 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Community Liaison(26) Community Liaison 26 3.00 3.00 5.00 1 Changed from Equity Team Member(27)2- new love your block Executive Assistant 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Mayor Equity Administration Total 5.00 5.00 8.00 Mayor Community Outreach New Division Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff, Senior Advisor 39 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from Policy Advisor(29) Community Liaison 26 0.00 0.00 4.00 4 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Community Outreach Sp&E Coord 24 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff, 1 new- know your neighbor Executive Assistant 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor Executive Staff Mayor Community Outreach Total 0.00 0.00 9.00 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TOTAL 30.00 32.00 34.00 277 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 911 COMMUNICATIONS 911 Dispatch Director 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 911 Dispatch Deputy Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 29 to 32 Grade Changed from 26 to 29, 1 Changed 911 Dispatch Operations Mgr 29 2.00 2.00 4.00 from 911 Dispatch Supervisor(27), 1 Changed from 911 Dispatch Dispatcher(20) 911 Dispatch Supervisor 27 10.00 10.00 9.00 911 Dispatch Dispatcher 1-III 20 90.00 82.00 81.00 Grade Changed from 14-18 to 20, 1 Changed to 911 Dispatch Operations Mgr(29) 911 Dispatch Dispatcher 1-111 Unfunded 20 3.00 3.00 3.00 Grade Changed from 14-18 to 20 Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 108.00 100.00 100.00 TOTAL DEPARTMENT OF • Office of the Executive Director Executive Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 ORAT Director 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 ORAT Specialist 31 0.00 0.50 0.50 Administrative Assistant-Appointed 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Construction Coordinator 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to Operations Division Office Technician 11 15 1.00 0.00 0.00 Executive Director's Office Total 6.00 5.50 4.50 Public Relations Division Director Airport Public Relations& 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 Marketing Air Service Development Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager Air Services 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Development Airport Communication Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Community Outreach Manager 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Communication Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Public Relations Manager 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Relations Total 4.00 4.00 4.00 Planning and Environmental Division Director of Airport Plan/Cap Program 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Planning&Environmental 36 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Director Airport Environmental Program 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager 278 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Airport Senior Environmental 31 1.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to Airport Environmental Sustainability Coordinator Sustainability Coordinator(27) Airport Planner Manager 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airport Senior Planner(30) Airport Senior Planner 30 3.00 3.00 2.00 1 Changed to Airport Planner Manager(33) Airport Principal Planner 27 0.00 0.00 2.00 1 New Position, 1 Changed from GIS ProgramAnalyst(27) Airport Environmental Sustainability 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airport Environmental Coord Sustainability Coordinator(31) Airport Planning Programs Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Planner 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environmental Specialist II 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Environmental Specialist I 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Geographic Information System Mgr 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Design &Construction Management Division 2 Transferred from Design &Construction GIS Programmer Analyst 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Management Division, 1 Changed to Airport Principal Planner(27) Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Planning&Environmental Total 9.00 10.00 15.00 Finance and Accounting Division Director of Finance and Accounting 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Controller 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Finance Manager 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Construction Finance Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to Maintenance Division Financial Analyst III 29 1.00 3.00 3.00 Auditor III 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accountant III 27 5.00 3.00 3.00 Warehouse Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor II 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accountant II 21 3.00 3.00 3.00 Airport Procurement Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Accountant 1 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Part-Time/Accounting Intern 0.50 0.50 0.50 Finance and Accounting Total 16.50 16.50 15.50 Maintenance Division Director of Maintenance 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Maintenance Director 36 4.00 4.00 4.00 Airport Maintenance Operations 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Superintendent 279 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Airport Fleet Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Maintenance Superintendent 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Changed from Facility Maintenance Contract Aviation Services Manager 31 2.00 2.00 3.00 Administrator(27) Airport Maintenance Ops Support Mgr 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Facilities Assets Manager 31 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Senior Facility Maint Supervisor(27) Airport Maintenance Manager 31 3.00 4.00 4.00 Warranty Commissioning Manager 30 1.00 1 New Position Facilities Maint Warranty/Commission 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mgr Technical Systems Program Mgr 29 2.00 1.00 1.00 Computer Maint Mgmt Systems 29 1.00 2.00 4.00 1 New Position, 1 Changed from Facility Administrator Support Coord(26) Computer Maint Systems Supervisor 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Tech Systems Analyst IV 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Energy Manager 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Airport Fleet/Warehouse Operations 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager Facility Maintenance Contract 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Aviation Services Manager(31) Administrator Senior Facility Maint Supervisor 27 3.00 5.00 4.00 1 Changed to Airport Facilities Assets Manager (31) Senior Airport Grounds/Pavement 27 4.00 4.00 4.00 Supervisor Plant Coordinator Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Aviation Srvs Tech Sys Adm 27 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Facility Support Coodinator (26) Civil Maint Warranty 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Manager 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 HVAC Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Management Services Supervisor 25 4.00 5.00 5.00 Facility Maint Supervisor 25 13.00 6.00 7.00 1 Changed from Painter II (20) Airport Signs Graphic Design Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Coordinator 25 25.00 32.00 33.00 1 New Position Airport Maintenance Supervisor 25 10.00 11.00 11.00 Electronic Security Technician 24 12.00 12.00 14.00 1 New Position, 1 Transferred from Finance& Accounting Division Management Analyst 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Grounds/Pavement Super 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Contract 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Coordinator 1 Changed to Aviation Srvs Tech Sys Adm(27), Facility Support Coordinator 26 4.00 6.00 4.00 1 Changed to Computer Maint Mgmt Sys Adm (29) Maintenance Electrician IV 22 3.00 4.00 4.00 Airfield Maintenance Electrician 25 21.00 21.00 21.00 28o Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Airfield Electrical Supervisor 27 4.00 4.00 5.00 1 new position HVAC Tech II 21 8.00 8.00 11.00 2 New Positions, 1 Changed from Carpenter II (20) Airport Lead Sign Technician 21 3.00 3.00 3.00 Senior Fleet Mechanic 21 5.00 6.00 6.00 Plumber II 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Procurement Specialist 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Budget&Special Projects 20 2.00 0.00 0.00 Coordinator 89 Changed from Airfield Maintenance Airfield Maint. Equip. Operator 1-11-III 16-23 23.00 89.00 90.00 Specialist(16-23), 1 Changed from Senior Florist(18) Airport Lighting&Sign Technician 20 5.00 3.00 3.00 Carpenter 11 20 6.00 9.00 8.00 1 Changed to HVAC Tech(21) General Maintenance Worker 20 6.00 2.00 6.00 2 New Positions, 1 Changed Fleet Body Repair and Painter 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Mechanic 1/11 20 20.00 20.00 20.00 Painter 11 20 5.00 7.00 6.00 1 Changed to Facility Maintenance Supervisor (25) Office Facilitator 1/11 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facilities Contract Compliance 19 6.00 6.00 6.00 1 New Position, 1 Changed to General Specialist Maintenance Worker(20) Facility Maint Contract Repair Tech 11 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Florist 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airfield Maintenance Specialist Airfield Maint. Equipment Oper 111 18 66.00 0.00 0.00 Maintenance Electrician I (Apprentice) 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Warehouse Operator 15 4.00 4.00 5.00 1 Changed from Warehouse Sup Worker- Airport(14) Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport 14 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Senior Warehouse Operator(15) Fleet Services Worker 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Intern 0.50 0.50 0.50 Maintenance Division Total 294.50 301.50 314.50 Engineering Division Director-Airport Engineering 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer VI I 36 2.00 2.00 2.00 Airport Architect 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Engineer Project Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Senior Architectural Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer VI 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Architect 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Transferred to Planning&Environmental Division Geographic Information System Mgr 33 1.00 1.00 0.00 Engineer V 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 281 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Engineering Construction Program 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager Construction Manager 27 3.00 3.00 3.00 Engineering Tech VI 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 GIS Programmer Analyst 27 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to Planning&Environmental Division Engineering Tech V 24 3.00 3.00 3.00 Architectural Associate IV 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Tech IV 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Construction Project 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator Project Coordinator III 22 2.00 2.00 2.00 Airport Field Technician 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Records Program 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Specialist Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Division Total 31.00 31.00 28.00 Operations Division Chief Operating Officer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Director of Airport Operations 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Operations Director 38 3.00 3.00 3.00 Airport Operations Superintendent- 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Security Comm Airport Operations Superintendent- 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landside Airport Operations Superintendent- 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Terminals Airport Operations Manager-Ground 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Transportation Airport Operations Manager/Parking 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Safety Management Systems(SMS) 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Program Manager Airport Operations Manager-Airfield 29 14.00 14.00 15.00 1 New Position Airport Operations Manager Airfield/ 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 FBO Airport Operations Manager- 29 2.00 2.00 2.00 Terminals Airport Operations Manager-Safety 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Operations Manager-Security 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Operations Manager/ 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications Airport Operations Manager- 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Customer Service Airport Customer Service Supervisor 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Training Coordinator 26 1.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Training Program Manager 29 0.00 0.00 4.00 3 Changed from Airport Safety Coord (26), 1 Changed from Airport Engagement Coord(24) 282 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Safety Program Coordinator 26 3.00 3.00 0.00 3 Changed to Airport Training ProgramManager(29) Airport Operations Supervisor-Airfield 25 0.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Landside Operations 25 12.00 11.00 11.00 Supervisor Airport Operations Duty Agent Supervisor 25 1.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Operations Supervisor/Access 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Control Airport Operations Access Control 23 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Position Coordinator Management Analyst 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Operations Supervisor/ 24 5.00 5.00 5.00 Communications Airport Operations Training Supervisor 24.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications Engagement Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Training ProgramManager(29) Airport Operations Specialists-Airfield 23 21.00 22.00 22.00 Airport Operations Specialists- 41 Changed from Airport Ops Specialist- Terminal/Landside 1-III 23 25.00 41.00 77.00 Terminal(23),36 Changed from Airport Landside Ops Officer(18) Airport Operations Customer Service 23 2.00 2.00 2.00 Representative Airport Operations Agent- FBO 23 6.00 6.00 6.00 Airport Operations Duty Agent 23 14.00 0.00 0.00 Employment Services Coordinator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Operations Division Airport Commercial Vehicle Ins 18 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New Position Airport Landside Operations Officer 18 36.00 36.00 0.00 36 Changed to Airport Ops Specialist- Terminal/Landside I - III (21 -24) Air Operations Security Spec 17 2.00 2.00 2.00 Airport Operations Lead Coordinator 17 4.00 4.00 4.00 Airport Operations Coordinator 16 14.00 12.00 12.00 Airport Operations Coord II 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Secretary 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Access Control Specialist 15 7.00 9.00 9.00 Office Technician II 15 1.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Operations Coord 1 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paging Operator 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Part-Time Operations Technician 2.50 2.50 2.50 Part-Time Operations Intern 1.00 1.00 1.00 Regular Part-Time/Paging Operator 10 0.30 0.30 0.30 Operations Division Total 196.80 196.80 201.80 Commercial Services Division Director Administration and 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Commercial Services 283 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Commercial Manager Airport 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Contracts&Procurement Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Property& Real Estate Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business Development Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Risk Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Tenant Relations Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Property Specialist II 27 3.00 3.00 3.00 Airport Contract Specialist 1 27 2.00 3.00 3.00 Commercial Program Specialist 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Airport Contracts Specialist II 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Risk Management Coordinator 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Airport Property Specialist 1 24 1.00 0.00 0.00 Admin Assistant/GRAMA Coord 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary II 21 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Secretary 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Commercial Services Division Total 16.00 15.00 15.00 Information Technology Services Division Airport Information Management 39.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Services Director Airport Information Technology 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager Airport Special Systems Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cybersecurity Engineer Manager 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Airport Tech Systems Superintendent 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Network Architect 36 0.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Software Engineer 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Network Engineering Team Manager 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Network System Engineer III 33 3.00 3.00 3.00 Network System Engineer II 31 1.00 2.00 2.00 Software Support Admin II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Technical System Program Manager 30 3.00 3.00 3.00 Network Support Team Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Network Support Administrator III 27 7.00 7.00 7.00 Technical Systems Analyst IV 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 Technical Systems Analyst III 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Network Support Administrator II 25 10.00 11.00 11.00 Technical Systems Analyst 11 24 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New Position Network Support Administrator 1 23 2.00 2.00 2.00 Information Technology Services 37.00 39.00 41.00 Division Total SLC DEPT OF AIRPORTS TOTAL (AIRPORT FUND) 610.80 619.30 639.30 284 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 OFFICE OF •R Office of City Attorney City Attorney 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office of City Attorney Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 Legal Support General Fund Deputy City Attorney 40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Division Chief Senior City Attorney 39 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior City Attorney 39 8.50 8.50 10.00 Moved .5 from Assistant City Attorney 1 from Divn Chief Sr Atty Assistant City Attorney 34 0.50 0.50 0.00 Moved to Senior City Attorney First Assistant City Prosecutor 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Assistant City Prosecutor 29 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New"Miami" Model Clty Prosecutor Associate City Prosecutor 27 10.00 10.00 11.00 Moved 1 from Paralegal Boards and Commissions Liaison 23 0.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Recorders Paralegal 21 4.50 4.50 4.50 Prosecutor Law Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Legal Secretary III 18 3.00 4.00 4.00 Senior Prosecutor Assistant 17 6.00 6.00 4.00 Moved 2 to Prosecutor Assistant Prosecutor Assistant 16 4.00 4.00 6.00 Moved 2 from Senior Prosecutor Assistant Legal Support Total 45.50 47.50 49.50 City Recorder City Recorder 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade change from 33 to 35 Asst City Recorder Operations 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Asst City Recorder Records Spec 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Minutes and Records Clerk 21 2.00 3.00 3.00 Grade change from 19 to 21 1 Deputy Recorder 26 3.00 3.00 3.00 Special Projects Analyst 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Associate Records Technician 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Boards&Commission Liaison 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Legal Support City Recorder Total 7.75 9.00 11.00 Risk Management Fund Risk Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade change from 34 to 35 Risk Management Analyst 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Risk Management Specialist Risk Management Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Risk Management Analyst Risk Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 0.50 285 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Claims Adjuster 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Gov Imm Senior Budget&Policy Analyst 32 0.00 0.30 0.30 FTE shared with Finance Office Facilitator I 18 0.50 0.50 0.00 Moved to Gov Imm Subtotal of Risk Mgmt Fund 2.50 2.80 3.80 Governmental Immunity Fund Division Chief Senior City Attorney 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Senior City Attorney Deputy Risk Manager 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 New position Senior City Attorney 39 3.50 3.50 4.00 Moved .5 from Assist City Attorney Assistant City Attorney 34 0.50 0.50 0.00 Moved .5 to Sr City Attorney Claims Adjuster 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Risk Legal Secretary III 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paralegal 21 2.50 2.50 1.50 Moved 1 to Associate City Prosecutor Office Facilitator 1 18 0.50 0.50 0.50 Subtotal of Gov Imm Fund 9.00 9.00 7.00 CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 66.75 70.30 73.30 General Fund 55.25 58.50 62.50 Risk Management Fund 2.50 2.80 3.80 Governmental Immunity Fund 9.00 9.00 7.00 DEPARTMENT OF • AND NEIGHBORHOODS CAN Admin Office of the Director CAN Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 CAN Deputy Director 37 2.00 2.00 2.00 CAN Financial &Administrative 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Services Dir Policy and Program Manager 32 2.00 3.00 2.00 Duplicate Position eliminated Civic Engagment Mgr.,Spec,Asst 21-31 0.00 0.00 0.00 CARES Real Property Mgr.,Agent, Spec 21-31 4.00 4.00 4.00 CIP Manager, Specialist 25-31 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to Finance Policy and Budget Business Systems Analyst II 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Financial Analyst III 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Youth and Family ADA&Equity Program Coordinators 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 1-11 18-19 1.00 0.00 0.00 CAN Admin Office of Director Total 15.00 15.00 12.00 Building Services Building Official 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Building Sery&Licensing Manager 32 3.00 3.00 3.00 286 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Development Review Spvr,Sr, Planner 25-30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-III Development Review Supervisor 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Economic Dev Business Coord 29 1.00 2.00 1.00 NWQ Liason Transferred to Planning Plans Examiner Sr,Chief, 1-111 25-29 8.00 8.00 8.00 Building Inspector Sr, 1-III 19-29 23.00 20.00 20.00 Civil Enforcement Spvr, Insp, Officer 1-111 17-29 9.00 15.00 17.00 2 New Positions Fire Protection Engineer 29 2.00 2.00 2.00 Housing/Zoning Legal Investigator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Special Projects Asst 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Permit Processor 1-11 14-16 4.00 4.00 4.00 Office Facilitator 1-111, Sr Secretary 15-19 5.00 5.00 5.00 Building Services Total 59.00 63.00 64.00 Engineering City Engineer 39 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deputy City Engineer 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineer II-VII 27-36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Architect City, Sr, Mgr., 111 29-36 0.00 0.00 0.00 GIS Mgr., Coord,Analyst,Spec 24-33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Survey City, Prof Land 26-30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Financial Analyst 111 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Const Program Project 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manager Engineering Technician IV-VI 23-27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Support Services Manager 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Civic Engagement Program Spec 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator 1-11 18-19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eng Info and Records Spec 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Housing Stability Director, Housing Stability 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director Housing Stability 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Policy and Program Manager, Spec 26-32 4.00 5.00 8.00 Combined Grant Admin Grant Admin Housing Program Manager 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Homeless Coordinator/Manager 26-29 2.00 3.00 3.00 Accountant 111 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Principal Planner 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Protection Analyst 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Mayor's Office Community Dev Grant Admin 26 3.00 3.00 0.00 Combined Grant Admin Housing Rehab Spec, Officer 1-11 22-25 5.00 4.00 5.00 Combined Housing positions 287 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Housing Loan Administrator 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Combined Housing positions Office Facilitator 1-11 18-19 1.00 2.00 2.00 Housing&Neighborhood Dev Total 20.00 21.00 22.00 Planning Planning Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Planning Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Planning Manager 33 4.00 5.00 6.00 Changed from Planning Programs Supervisor Planning Programs Supervisor 31 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Planning Manager Development Review Spvr,Sr, Planner 25-30 7.00 6.00 6.00 1-III Planner Senior, Principal,Assoc 24-28 24.00 24.00 25.00 Transferred NWQ Liason from Building Services Graphic Design Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 18 2.00 2.00 2.00 Graphic Design Tech 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Planning Total 41.00 41.00 42.00 Transportation Director of Transportation Planning 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Transportation 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer II-VII 33-36 7.00 7.00 7.00 Transportation Program Manager 33 2.00 2.00 2.00 Transit Program Planner 1-III 25.28 7.00 11.00 11.00 Traffic Control Center Super,Oper 1-II 23-26 2.00 2.00 2.00 Traffic Control Center Super 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Special Projects Analyst 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Traffic Tech 1-II 23 4.00 4.00 4.00 Traffic Control Center Oper 1-II 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Traffic Control Center 1 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator II,Tech 15-19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Office Technician 1 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transportation Total 26.00 30.00 30.00 Youth&Family Division Youth &Family Div Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN Admin,Changed to grade 30 Associate Director Youth City 29 2.00 3.00 3.00 Senior Community Programs Manager 24-26 1.00 1.00 17.00 4 New Positions/Combined with Community Programs Mgr Community Programs Manager 24 7.00 8.00 0.00 Combined with Community Program Mgr St Events Coordinator Sorenson 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 288 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator II 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to grade 20 Office Tech II 15 1.00 0.00 0.00 Program Assistant 14 4.00 4.00 0.00 Changed to Community Programs Manager Sr Youth City Coordinator 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Youth &Family Total 18.00 20.00 25.00 COMMUNITY&NEIGHBORHOOD 179.00 190.00 195.00 TOTAL General Fund 176.00 190.00 195.00 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Transportation 3.00 0.00 0.00 Fund ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Economic Development Economic Development Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Economic Development Deputy 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Director Technology&Innovation Strategic Ind 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Advisor Director of Business Development 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 32 to 33 Economic Development Manager 29 4.00 4.00 4.00 4 Grade Changed from 25 to 26, 1 Transferred ED Project Coordinator 26 3.00 3.00 4.00 from Arts Council, 1 Changed from Public Art Program Manager Executive Manager 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 24 to 26 Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Economic Development Total 12.00 13.00 14.00 Arts Council Arts Council Executive Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Arts Council Assistant Director 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Arts Council Program Manager 29 0.00 1.00 1.00 Public Art Program Manager 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Economic Development, Changed to ED Project Coordinator(26) Arts Council Program Coordinator 25 2.00 4.00 4.00 Office Facilitator 1 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 18 to 20 Arts Council Total 6.00 9.00 8.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 18.00 22.00 22.00 REDEVELOPMENT Redevelopment Agency Director-Redevelopment Agency 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Chief Operating Officer(41) 289 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Deputy Director- Redevelopment 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Deputy Chief Operating Officer Agency (37) Senior Project Manager 34 2.00 2.00 4.00 Grade changed from 33 to 34,2 Changed from Project Manager(29) Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Financial Analyst III (29) Grade changed from 29 to 32,2 Changed to Project Manager 29 7.00 7.00 4.00 Senior Project Manager, 1 Changed to Project Coordinator(27) RDA Communications and Outreach 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to RDA Communications and Manager Outreach Manager(32) Communications Coordinator 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 27 to 25, Changed from Special Projects Assistant(21) Redevelopment Agency Property 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Property Administrator(26) Manager Project Coordinator 27 1.00 2.00 4.00 Grade changed from 24 to 27, 1 Changed from Project Manager(29),Added two positions Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accountant II 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to Communications Coordinator(25). Promoted part-time intern to fill position Office Facilitator II Non-Union 20 2.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 19 to 20 Office Facilitator 1 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Redevelopment Agency Total 19.00 19.00 21.00 Gallivan Plaza Plaza&Comm Events Div Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Gallivan Event Adv/Mktg Manager 25 2.00 2.00 2.00 Plaza Marketing/Activities Supr 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator II Non-Union 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 19 to 20 General Maintenance Worker 16/18/21 5.00 5.00 5.00 2 GMW 1, 1 GMW II,2 GMW III Office Technician 1 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 12 to 15 Custodian II 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gallivan Plaza Total 13.00 13.00 13.00 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL 32.00 32.00 34.00 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance Office of the Director Chief Financial Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director 39 1.00 1.00 2.00 Controller 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Business Sys Analyst Team Lead 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 290 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Business Sys Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Business Analyst(29) Financial Analyst II 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 New position Payroll &Accounting Manager 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Business Analyst 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Business System Analyst II (30) Grant Manager 29 0.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Grants Administration City Payroll Administrator 26 2.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Grants Acq/Project Coordinator 25 2.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Grants Administration Sr Payroll Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Payroll Kronos Specialist 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 City A/P Coordinator 20 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 Changed to Accounts Payable Clerk(18),2 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Finance Office of the Director Total 16.00 17.00 8.00 Finance Accounting Reporting Accounting Controller 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Office of the Director Deputy Controller 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Manager 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Financial Analyst IV(RDA)(32) Financial Analyst IV 32 2.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to Financial Analyst III (30) Financial Analyst IV(RDA) 32 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Financial Manager(33) Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Financial Analyst IV(33) Financial Analyst II 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Staffing/Position ControlSpecialist(22) Staffing/Position Control Specialist 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Financial Analyst II (25) Property Control Agent 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Policy, Budget and Capital Planning 1 Changed to Accounts Payable Clerk(18), City A/P Coordinator 20 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Office of the Director 1 Changed from City A/P Coordinator(20), Accounts Payable Clerk 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Office of the Director Payroll Payroll &Accounting Manager 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Office of the Director City Payroll Administrator 26 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Sr Payroll Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Payroll Kronos Specialist 22 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred to Finance Accounting Reporting Finance Accounting Reporting Total 6.00 6.00 13.00 291 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Finance Internal Audit Director Int Audit&Fin Analysis 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sr Financial Analyst Auditor 32 4.00 4.00 3.00 1 Transferred to Finance Revenue, 1 Changedto Financial Analyst IV(32) Transferred to Finance Revenue, Changed to Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Financial Analyst II(25) Internal Audit&Financial Analysis 6.00 6.00 4.00 Total Finance Revenue Collections Director Revenue&Collections 36 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Deputy Finance Director of Revenue Operations(35) Director of Revenue Operations 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Collections Manager(30) Collections Manager 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Director of Revenue Operations (35) Lead Collections Officer 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Transferred to Policy&Budget, Changed to Collections Officer 20 4.00 4.00 3.00 Capital Planning Asset Mgr(35) Lead Hearing Officer Referee Coord. 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Grants Administration Hearing Officer Referee Coord II 18 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 Transferred from Finance Grants Administration Licensing City Licensing Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business License Liaison 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Business License Officer(17) Landlord/Tenant License Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business License Officer 17 3.00 3.00 2.00 1 Changed to Business License Liaison(25) Good Landlord Manager 16 0.00 1.00 1.00 Business License Processor II 16 3.00 3.00 4.00 Changed from Business License Processor I (14) Business License Processor 1 14 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Business License Processor II (16) Analytics Financial Analytics Manager 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Financial Analyst IV(32) 1 Transferred from Finance Internal Audit, 1 Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 2.00 2.00 Transferred to Finance Policy&Budget, 1 Changed to Financial Analytics Manager(33), 1 Changed from Financial Analyst III (29) Financial Analyst III 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Financial Analyst IV(32) 1 Transferred from Finance Internal Audit,2 Financial Analyst II 25 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from Financial Analyst I (21) Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Finance Revenue Total 19.00 21.00 23.00 Finance Grants Administration 292 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Grant Manager 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 Grade changed from 29 to 31,Transferred from Finance Office of the Director Grants Acq/Project Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 Grade changed from 25 to 29,2 Transferred to Finance Grants Administration Lead Hearing Officer Referee Coord. 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Finance Revenue Hearing Officer Referee Coord II 18 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to Finance Revenue Finance Grants Administration Total 3.00 3.00 3.00 Finance Purchasing Chief Procurement Officer 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Chief Procurement Officer 33 0.00 1.00 1.00 City Contracts Administrator 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Procurement Manager 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Sr Purchasing Consultant(27) Sr Purchasing Consultant 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Procurement Manager(29) Procurement Specialist II 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Procurement Specialist 1 (24) Procurement Specialist 1 24 2.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to Procurement Specialist 11(25) Contract Development Specialist 23 3.00 3.00 5.00 2 New Positions(FY2023 BA#4) Office Facilitator 11 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Contracts Process Coordinator 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance Purchasing Total 10.00 11.00 13.00 Finance Treasurer City Treasurer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Treasurer 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cash&Investment Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 2.00 2.00 2.00 Cashier Administrator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst 1 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 21 to 22 City Payment Processor Finance Treasurer's Office Total 9.00 9.00 9.00 Finance Policy, Budget and Capital Planning Policy&Budget City Budget Director 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Budget&Policy Analyst 32 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Policy&Budget Analyst(29) Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 1.00 1.00 Policy&Budget Analyst 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Senior Budget&Policy Analyst (32) Capital Asset Planning Capital Asset Planning Manager 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Revenue, Changedfrom Collections Officer(20) 293 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Revenue CIP Impact Fee Manager 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN Office of the Director Capital Improvement Program 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN Office of the Director Specialist Property Control Agent 22 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Accounting Reporting Finance Budget&Policy Total 3.00 4.00 9.00 FINANCE 72.00 77.00 82.00 General Fund 71.70 76.70 81.70 Risk Fund 0.30 0.30 0.30 FIRE DEPARTMENT Office of the Fire Chief Fire Chief 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Chief 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Fire Chief 35 2.00 2.00 2.00 Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Administrative Secretary II(21) Financial Manager 1-III 33-35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Financial &Admin Svs Manager (32) Accountant I-IV 18-27 3.00 3.00 3.00 Office of the Fire Chief Total 9.00 9.00 9.00 Operations Battalion Chief 33 6.00 6.00 6.00 Captain 30 65.00 65.00 66.00 1 New Position Fire Fighter 22-27 222.00 228.00 232.00 4 New Positions Fire Fighter Unfunded 22-27 10.00 10.00 10.00 Operations Total 303.00 309.00 314.00 Fire Administrative Services Battalion Chief 33 7.00 7.00 7.00 Captain 30 14.00 14.00 15.00 1 New Position Enterprise Tech Solutions Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Director Emergency Communications(29) Social Work Manager 29 0.00 1.00 1.00 Emergency Management Public 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Emergency Mgt Multi-Language Information Officer/JIC Coordinator Media Coordinator(25) Community Health Care Paramedic 24 2.00 2.00 2.00 Public Education Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business Systems Analyst I II 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Public Safety TechnologySystems Coordinator(24) Emergency Mgt Training Program 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 24 to 25 Specialist 294 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Community Preparedness Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Fighter 22-27 21.00 29.00 29.00 Social Worker 21-26 0.00 2.00 6.00 4 New Positions Recruiting/Outreach Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 20 to 24 Senior Communication Tech 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 20 to 24 Fire Logistics Coordinator 19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Office Facilitator II 19 3.00 4.00 4.00 Emergency Mgt Critical Infrastructure 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 18 to 23 Liaison Fire Prevention Specialist 17 3.00 3.00 3.00 Office Technician 1 12 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Administrative Services Total 62.00 74.00 79.00 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 374.00 392.00 402.00 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Human Resource Administrative Support Chief Human Resource Officer 41 0.80 0.80 0.80 Deputy Chief Human Resource Officer 37 0.85 1.00 1.00 Civilian Review Board Investigator 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Recruiting&Onboarding Mgr 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.80 0.80 0.80 Human Resources Supervisor- 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Recruitment HRIS Business Analyst 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Compensation and Classification 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Analyst Human Resources Leave Specialist 29 0.80 0.80 0.80 Senior HR Recruiter 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Employee Marketing& 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Communications HR Office Administrator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Benefits Analyst 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Benefits Analyst 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 HR Business Partner I 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position HR Recruiter 25 1.00 3.00 3.00 Project and Policy Manager 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position HR Admin &Onboarding Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Associate HR Recruiter 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior HR Technician 19 3.00 4.00 4.00 Administrative Support Total 17.25 20.40 22.40 295 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Departmental Consultants Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 Employee Relations/EEO Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Employee Relations Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resource Business Partner II 29 5.80 7.00 7.00 Departmental Consultants Total 6.80 9.00 9.00 Training Education Program Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Learning and Development Specialist 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Training&Development Coordinator 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Human Resource Management Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 Benefits Chief Human Resource Officer 41 0.20 0.20 0.20 Human Resource Deputy Director 37 0.15 0.00 0.00 Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.20 0.20 0.20 Human Resources Supervisor- 30 1.00 2.00 2.00 Benefits Human Resource Leave Specialist 30 0.20 1.20 1.20 Human Resource Business Partner II 29 0.20 0.00 0.00 Employee Marketing& 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Communications Senior Benefits Analyst 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 Benefits Analyst 25 1.00 0.00 0.00 Benefits Total 4.95 4.60 4.60 Human Resources Total 31.00 36.00 38.00 General Fund 26.05 31.40 33.40 Risk Fund 4.95 4.60 4.60 DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Department Leadership and Administration Chief Information Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Innovations Consultant 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position IMS Deputy Director 39 0.00 1.00 2.00 Title changed from Deputy CIO, 1 moved from Innovations Department Leadership and 1.00 2.00 4.00 Administration Totals Financial Services Financial Manager 1 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 296 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Financial Analyst II-III 24-29 2.00 2.00 2.00 Office Facilitator 1-III 18-22 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Asset Management Administrator 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Inventory Control Specialist 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Purchasing and Administration 3.00 3.00 4.00 Totals Infrastructure Technology Services (ITS) Chief Information Security Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 Enterprise Tech Solutions Manager 35 0.00 1.00 1.00 Cybersecurity Engineer 1-III 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Network Engineering Team Manager 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 IT Systems Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00 Network Systems Engineer 1-III 27-33 12.00 14.00 14.00 INF Technology Support Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Network Support Administrator I - III 23-27 12.00 12.00 13.00 1 New Position Infrastructure Technology Services 28.00 32.00 34.00 Totals Geographical Information Systems Chief Data Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 GIS Programmer Analyst 30 2.00 2.00 2.00 Geo Info Systems(GIS)Coord 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Data/Info Specialist 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Geographical Information Systems 4.00 4.00 5.00 Totals Software Services Chief Technology Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications Director 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Software Engineer Team Manager 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Software Engineer Team Lead 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Software Engineering Data Admin 36 3.00 3.00 3.00 Sr Software Engineer 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Software Lead 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Geo Info Systems(GIS)Coord 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Software Engineer 1-III 27-33 5.00 5.00 5.00 Software Support Admin 1-III 28-32 15.00 16.00 16.00 Tech Solution Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Software Support Totals 30.00 31.00 32.00 Media and Engagement Services Video Production Manager 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 297 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Multimedia Production Spec 1-III 23-31 4.00 4.00 4.00 Social Media Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Communications Specialist 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Civic Engagement Program Specialist 24 5.00 5.00 5.00 Multimedia Production Services 10.00 10.00 12.00 Totals Enterprise Project Management Technology Solution Team Lead 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 INF Tech Project Manager 35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Software Lead 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Solution Management Totals 4.00 4.00 3.00 Innovations Team Chief Innovations Officer 36 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Deputy Director INF Tech Project Manager 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from EPM Innovations Team Lead 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Innovations Consultant 30 2.00 2.00 2.00 Civic Engagement Specialist 24 0.00 2.00 2.00 Solution Management Totals 4.00 6.00 6.00 INFORMATION MGMT SVCS TOTALS (IMS FUND) 84.00 92.00 100.00 JUSTICE COURT justice Court Justice Court Judge 37 5.00 5.00 5.00 Title change City Courts Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Manager I 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Financial Analyst IV(32) Justice Court Manager 28 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade changed from 26 to 28 Justice Court Supervisor 26 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade changed from 24 to 26 Accountant II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business Systems Analyst I 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Justice Court Case Manager(19) Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Justice Court Lead Judicial Assistant 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 City Payment Processor 15 2.00 2.00 2.00 Justice Court Judicial Assistant III 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Justice Court Judicial Assistant II 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Justice Court Judicial Assistant 1 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Justice Court Judicial Assistant 1-II-III 15-17 25.00 25.00 25.00 justice Court Total 42.00 42.00 42.00 298 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of the Police Chief Chief of Police 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Chief 39 0.00 0.00 0.00 Communications Administrative 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Director Internal Affairs Administrative Director 37 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Sgt Position Mental Health Professional 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Data Science and Research 34 0.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Field Ops II Administrator Lieutenant--Police 32 2.00 2.00 2.00 Financial &Admin Services Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sergeant Police 29 4.00 4.00 4.00 Police Public Relations Director 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grant Acquis&Proj Fin Analyst 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Community Programs Manager 24 1.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Assistant Appointed 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Graphic Design Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accountant 1-III 21-27 4.00 4.00 4.00 Police Services Coordinator 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Police Officer 19-25 7.00 7.00 7.00 Administrative Secretary 1-11 18-21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 1-II 18-19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Tech 1-11 45275 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office of the Police Chief Total 30.00 30.00 30.00 Administrative Bureau Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Captain--Police 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lieutenant--Police 32 2.00 2.00 2.00 Emergency Mgt Program Director 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sergeant--Police 29 5.00 5.00 5.00 Crime Lab/Evidence Room Director 2930 1.00 1.00 1.00 Forensic Scientist Lab Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Quality Assurance Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crime Stats&Analysis Director 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Records Director 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Victim Advocate Program Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Outreach Program Administrator 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Safety Tech Systems 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator 299 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Crime Lab Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Emergency Management City Wide 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Training&Exercise Coord Forensic Scientist 1-11 23-26 6.00 6.00 6.00 Sr Communications Tech 2324 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Evidence Supervisor 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Community Preparedness Coord. 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grama Coordinator 23 0.00 1.00 1.00 Information Systems Supervisor 22 5.00 5.00 5.00 Victim Advocate 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Police Intelligence Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grama Coordinator/Paralegal 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Police Officer 1-111 19-25 15.00 26.00 26.00 Authorization -Early Hire Police Officer 19-25 20.00 20.00 20.00 Office Facilitator 18-19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fleet Mgt Services Supervisor 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator Emergency Management Asst Crit 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Infrastructure Liaison Crime Lab Technician 1-11 16-19 14.00 14.00 14.00 Evidence Technician 1-11 16 6.00 6.00 6.00 Sr Police Information Specialist 15 12.00 12.00 12.00 Technical Support Specialist 15 5.00 5.00 5.00 Gang Outreach Coordinator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Police Information Specialist 13 16.00 16.00 16.00 Office Tech 1-11 45275 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative 119.00 131.00 131.00 Field Operations I Bureau Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Captain Police 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lieutenant--Police 32 8.00 9.00 9.00 Social Work Director 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sergeant--Police 29 21.00 21.00 21.00 Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 LCSW/Mental Health Counselor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Police Officer 19-25 164.00 164.00 170.00 Add 6 Officers at Airport Authorization-Early Hire Police Officer 19-25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Social Work Case Worker 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator 1-11 18-19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 1 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Civilian Response Specialist 19 0.00 12.00 16.00 Add 4 new Positions 3O0 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Office Tech 1-11 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Field Operations I Bureau 199.00 212.00 222.00 Field Operations II Bureau Deputy Chief--Police 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 Captain Police 34 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lieutenant--Police 32 8.00 8.00 8.00 Sergeant--Police 29 22.00 22.00 22.00 Police Officer 19-25 166.00 166.00 165.00 Moved to Deputy Chief Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 3.00 From Investigations Police Intelligence Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 3.00 From Investigations Crime Stats&Analysis Director 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 From Investigations Data Science and Research 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 Administrator Office Facilitator 1-11 18-19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Tech 1-11 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Field Operations II Bureau 200.00 200.00 208.00 Investigative Bureau Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Captain Police 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lieutenant--Police 32 4.00 4.00 4.00 Social Work Director 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sergeant--Police 29 18.00 19.00 19.00 Victim Advocate Director 29 0.00 1.00 1.00 Social Work Manager 26 1.00 3.00 3.00 Victim Advocate Program Coordinator 25 1.00 2.00 2.00 LCSW/Mental Health Counselor 24 9.00 6.00 6.00 Community Programs Manager 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crime Stats&Analysis Director 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Field Ops 11 Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 3.00 3.00 0.00 Moved to Field Ops 11 Victim Advocate 22 2.00 3.00 3.00 Police Intelligence Specialist 21 3.00 3.00 0.00 Moved to Field Ops 11 Police Officer 19-25 112.00 112.00 112.00 Social Work Case Worker 19 11.00 9.00 9.00 Office Facilitator 1-11 18-19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Youth Specialists 15 0.00 4.00 4.00 Office Tech 1-11 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Investigative Bureau 172.00 177.00 170.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 720.00 750.00 761.00 301 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT Public Lands Administration Parks&Public Lands Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Lands Deputy Director 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance Manager II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 0.35 0.35 0.35 Changed from Parks Usage Coordinator to Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Financial Analyst III (30)Transferred from Parks Division Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Comm/Events&Marketing Mgr 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 PPL Project Manager 28 1.00 0.00 0.00 PPL Landscape Planner 28 2.00 0.00 0.00 PPL Asset Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Community&Building Partnership 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator Public Lands Event Manager 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Special Events Permit Manager 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Civic Engagement Program Specialist 24 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Manager 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Office Facilitator II (19) Special Projects Asst 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Special Event Permit Coordinator 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Specialist 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.00 0.50 New Position Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Lands Administration Total 17.35 15.35 17.85 Parks Division Parks Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Operations Manager 31 2.00 2.00 1.85 15%of FTE transferred to TNL division City Sexton 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Regional Athletic Complex Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 District Supervisor 25 8.00 9.00 9.00 Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Electrician IV 22 1.00 1.00 2.00 New Position Metal Fabrication Tech 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Events Coordinator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Plumber II 21 3.00 1.00 1.00 General Maintenance Worker III 21 4.00 0.00 0.00 302 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Parks Usage Coordinator 21 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Financial Analyst III(30) Transferred to Admin Division Central Control Irrigation Specialist 20 2.00 2.00 3.00 New Position Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 1.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Florist 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sprinkler Irrigation Tech II 18 3.00 0.00 0.00 Cemetery Equipment Operators 17 4.00 4.00 4.00 Graffiti Response Field Tech 16 6.00 6.00 6.00 Parks Maintenance Tech 1-11-III 13-19 20.00 22.00 33.00 Changed to Parks Maintenance Tech(I - III) (19), 1 New Position General Maintenance Worker 1-111 16-20 1.00 5.00 6.00 New Position Sprinkler Irrigation Tech 1-111 16-20 2.00 8.00 9.00 New Position Office Tech 11 15 3.00 3.00 3.00 Parks Groundskeeper 12 10.00 10.00 0.00 Changed to Parks Maintenance Tech(I - 111)(19) Parks Total 78.00 81.00 84.85 Planning&Ecological Services Division,formerly Trails and Natural Lands Division Deputy Director Public Lands 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 Operations Manager 31 0.00 1.00 1.15 Changed from Park Ranger Manager(29), 15% of FTE transferred from Parks division Planning Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Park PPL Projet Manager(28) Changed from PPL Landscape Planner to PPL Landscape Planner 28 0.00 2.00 4.00 Public Lands Planner.(2) New FTE's from FY23 BA#4(bond funded) Recreation Trails Project Manager 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Strategy&Special Projects Manager to Recreation Trails Project Manager Park Ranger Supervisor 27 0.00 1.00 1.00 Environmental Specialist 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Natural Lands Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Stewardship and Education 22 1.00 0.00 0.00 Coordinator Park Ranger Leads 21 0.00 4.00 4.00 Park Ranger 19 0.00 14.00 14.00 Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Office Facilitator 11 (19) Sr Natural Resource Technician 16 2.00 2.00 7.00 5 New Positions Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 1.00 0.00 0.00 Trails and Natural Lands Total 7.00 29.00 37.15 Urban Forestry Division Urban Forestry Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 32 to 35 FY23 BA#4 Urban Forestry Operations Manager 28 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Arborist 111(21) Urban Forestry Services Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Forestry Crew Supervisor(24) 303 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Urban Forestry Field Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from Forestry Crew Supervisor(25) Forest Area Service Coordinator 22 3.00 4.00 3.00 Arborist Crew Foreman 21 0.00 0.00 4.00 Changed from Arborist III Arborist II 19 4.00 5.00 4.00 Changed 1 to Arborist Urban Forestry Services Supervisor Arborist 1 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Tech 15 0.00 1.00 1.00 Urban Forestry Total 10.00 13.00 18.00 Golf Division Golf Program-Golf Fund Golf Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 0.65 0.65 0.65 Golf Professional III 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Golf Course Super 27 to 36 holes 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Golf Course Super 18 holes 27 3.00 3.00 3.00 Golf Professional 11 28 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade Changed from 26 to 28 Golf Superintendent 9 Hole 25 2.00 2.00 2.00 Golf Professional 1 23 3.00 3.00 3.00 Player Development and Programs 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Mgr Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Golf Club Professional 20 4.00 4.00 4.00 Assistant Golf Course Super 20 12.00 12.00 12.00 Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.00 0.50 New Position Office Facilitator 11 19 1.00 0.00 0.00 Office Tech 11 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Golf Subtotal for Golf Fund 33.65 33.65 34.15 Golf Division Total 33.65 33.65 34.15 PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT TOTAL 146.00 172.00 192.00 General Fund 112.35 138.35 157.85 Golf Fund 33.65 33.65 34.15 DEPARTMENT OF Administrative Services Public Services Department Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Admin Services Deputy Director 38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deputy Director, Public Services 38 1.00 2.00 2.00 304 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Safety and Security Manager 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 New position Enterprise Tech Solutions Manager 35 0.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Communications and Administration 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager Business Systems Analyst Team Lead 33 1.00 0.00 0.00 CARES Policy&Program Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Safety Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Strategy&Special Project Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Safety Coordinator 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 Communications Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst II 24 1.00 0.00 0.00 Management Analyst 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst I-IV 21-32 2.00 5.00 5.00 Public Outreach and Information 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Liaison Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 0.00 0.00 Office of Director Total 15.00 18.00 19.00 Engineering City Engineer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy City Engineer 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer VI I 36 2.00 2.00 2.00 City Architect 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Project Manager 34 0.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer VI 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer V 33 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New Position Environmental Engineer GIS Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Architect 33 2.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Landscape Architect 33 1.00 2.00 2.00 Engineer IV 31 6.00 6.00 6.00 GIS Systems Coordinator 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Licensed Architect 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 City Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer III 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Landscape Architect III 29 3.00 3.00 3.00 Engineering Const Program Project 29 3.00 3.00 3.00 Manager Business Systems Analyst 28 0.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer II 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 305 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Engineering Technician VI 27 3.00 3.00 3.00 Professional Land Surveyor 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering GIS/Asset Management 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 Specialist Engineering Procurement&Contracts 25 1.00 0.00 0.00 Specialist GIS Specialist 24 3.00 2.00 2.00 Civic Engagement Program Spec 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Tech V 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Tech IV Union 23 4.00 4.00 4.00 GIS Tech II 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eng. Info and Records Spec 20 2.00 2.00 2.00 Office Facilitator II 19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Engineering Total 48.00 49.00 50.00 Golf Division Golf Program-Golf Fund Golf Division Director 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Associate Director 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Manager 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Professional 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Course Super 27 to 36 holes 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 9-hole Golf Professional 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Course Super 18 holes 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Superintendent 9 Hole 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Assistant Golf Club Professional 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Assistant Golf Course Super 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Subtotal for Golf Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 Golf Division Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Youth&Family Division Youth &Family Div Director 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Associate Director Youth City 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Community Programs Manager 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Events Coordinator Sorenson 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 3o6 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Program Assistant 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Youth City Coordinator 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Youth&Family Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Compliance Division Compliance Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Compliance Div Field Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Compliance Swing-Shift Field 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Supervisor Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Pay Station Tech 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lead Compliance Enforcement Officer 20 3.00 3.00 3.00 Crossing Guard Program&Outreach Coordinator 19 0.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Enforcement Officer 18 17.00 16.00 16.00 Office Tech II 15 2.00 2.00 2.00 Crossing Guard Coordinator 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Tech 1 12 2.00 2.00 2.00 Compliance Total 29.00 29.00 29.00 Facilities Services Division Building Maintenance Program Facilities Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Project Manager 34 0.00 1.00 1.00 Operations Manager 34 1.00 2.00 2.00 Energ /Utilities Management 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator Business Systems Analyst II 31 0.00 1.00 1.00 Facilities Commissioning Authority 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 29 2.00 2.00 2.00 Business Systems Analyst 1 28 1.00 0.00 0.00 Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Position Building Administrator District Supervisor 25 1.00 2.00 2.00 Maintenance Electrician IV 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Plumber III 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lead HVAC Technician 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 HVAC Technician II 21 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Bldg Maintenance Tech 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maintenance Specialist III 21 5.00 0.00 0.00 Carpenter II 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Painter 11 20 1--.W T. a-.GG 307 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gen Maint Worker IV 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Specialist II 19 10.00 0.00 0.00 Building Equipment Operator II 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 General Maintenance Worker III 18 1.00 0.00 0.00 Building Equipment Operator 1 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maintenance Specialist 1-III 17-21 1.00 17.00 21.00 4 New Positions Apprenticeship Program Equipment Operator 17 2.00 2.00 2.00 General Maintenance Worker 111 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 General Maintenance Worker 1 16 2.00 2.00 2.00 Senior Facilities Landscaper 16 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sprinkler Irrigation Tech 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Technician II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Beautification Maintenance Worker 11 13 3.00 0.00 0.00 Beautification Maintenance Worker 1-11 12-13 2.00 7.00 7.00 Facilities Services Total 47.00 52.00 57.00 Fleet Management Division Fleet Mgmt Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Business Systems Analyst 1 28 0.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Asset Manager 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 Fleet Mgmt Service Supervisor 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 Fleet Senior Mechanic 25 3.00 3.00 3.00 Fleet Warehouse Super 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Metal Fabrication Tech 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Customer Service Advisor Lead 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Customer Service Advisor 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Mechanic 20 25.00 25.00 25.00 Fleet Customer Service Advisor 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 11 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Mechanic Trainee 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Senior Warehouse Operator 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Parts Warehouse Support Worker 14 3.00 3.00 3.00 Fleet Parts Delivery Driver 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Management Total(FLEET 45.00 46.00 46.00 FUND) Streets Division Streets Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 3o8 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Operations Manager 31 3.00 3.00 3.00 Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer III 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Engineering Operations Supervisor 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 Streets Operations Maintenance 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Supervisor Streets Response Team Field Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Supervisor 25 4.00 4.00 4.00 Traffic Signal Lead 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Traffic Signal Tech II 23 3.00 4.00 4.00 Response Team Leader 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Streets Maintenance Lead 21 6.00 6.00 6.00 Traffic Maintenance Lead 21 2.00 2.00 2.00 Traffic Signal Tech 1 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 GIS Technician 1 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Concrete Finisher 20 10.00 10.00 10.00 Senior Asphalt Equipment Oper 20 12.00 12.00 12.00 Lead Equipment Operator 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 11 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 Streets Response Team Member 11 19 1.00 2.00 2.00 Asphalt Equipment Oper II 18 38.00 37.00 37.00 Concrete Saw&Grinder Oper 18 2.00 2.00 2.00 Streets Response Team Member 1 18 2.00 1.00 1.00 Traffic Maintenance Operator II 18 7.00 11.00 11.00 Communication and GIS Coordinator 18 1.00 0.00 0.00 Equipment Operator 17 5.00 5.00 5.00 Asphalt Equipment Oper 1 16 0.00 1.00 1.00 Traffic Maintenance Operator 1 16 3.00 1.00 1.00 Office Tech II 15 1.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Converted PT to FT Senior Communications Coordinator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Streets Total 110.00 113.00 115.00 PUBLIC LANDS Public Lands Administration Public Lands Deputy Director 38 0.00 0.00 0.00 Business Systems Analyst 11 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscape Architect 111 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Comm/Events&Marketing Mgr 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 PPL Project Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Warehouse Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 309 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Parks Usage Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Lands Administration Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parks Division Parks Division Director 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operations Manager 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Athletic Complex Manager 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Sexton 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 District Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Advertising/Marketing Mgr 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Special Events Permit Manager 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Maintenance Electrician IV 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Metal Fabrication Tech 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Events Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Plumber II 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Central Control Irrigation Specialist 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Concrete Finisher 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 General Maintenance Worker IV 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Special Event Permit Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Florist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sprinkler Irrigation Tech II 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cemetery Equipment Operators 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Graffiti Response Field Tech 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sprinkler Irrigation Tech I 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parks Groundskeeper 12 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parks Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Trails and Natural Lands Division Trails&Natural Lands Division Director 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Natural Lands Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volunteer&Outreach Coordinator 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 310 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Trails and Natural Lands Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Urban Forestry Division Urban Forestry Division Director 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Forestry Crew Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Forest Area Service Coordinator 22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arborist III 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arborist II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Arborist 1 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Urban Forestry Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 294.00 307.00 316.00 TOTAL General Fund 249.00 261.00 270.00 Fleet Management Fund 45.00 46.00 46.00 Golf Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 DEPARTMENT OF Administration Director--Public Utilities 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director-Public Utilities 39 2.00 2.00 2.00 Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Utilities Policy&Public Affairs 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Chief Stradegy&Innovations Director Officer(37) GIS Info Tech Systems Admin 36 1.00 1.00 0.00 Geographic Information Systems(GIS) 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 g Safety Program Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 31 to 33 PU Communications Engagement 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager GIS Programmer Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 PU Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 GIS Programmer Analyst 1 28 3.00 3.00 3.00 Engineering Tech VI 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 Safety Coordinator 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Talent Management Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Utility Planner&Development 25 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed 1 from Util Dev Review Specialist(19) Coordinator Locator Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Manager to Supervisor GIS Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Safety Inspector 24 0.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Position GIS Leak Detection Tech II 23 2.00 2.00 2.00 Communications Specialist 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Public Relations Coordinator (23) 311 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 GIS Technician 1 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Mobile Inventory Specialist& 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Technician Util Dev Review Specialist 19 4.00 4.00 4.00 1 New position added; 1 Changed to Utility planner&Development Coordinator(25) Senior Utility Locator 19 8.00 8.00 8.00 Office Facilitator 11 19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed from Office Technician II (15) Utility Locator 17 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Administration Total 36.00 38.00 44.00 Maintenance Operations Maint Superintendent 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Distribution System Mgr 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Computer Operation Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maint Support Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Maintenance Manager 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Storm Water Maint Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 WW Collection Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Irrigation Canal Systems Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water System Maintenance Super 27 4.00 4.00 4.00 Water System Operation Super 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 Electrical Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Manager 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Technical System Analyst III-IV 26-28 3.00 3.00 3.00 Water Service Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Waste Water Collection Supervisor 26 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade Changed from 25 to 26 Lift Station Maintenance Supervisor 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 25 to 26 Storm Water Maintenance Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 2.00 Water Meter Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Office Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Water Meter Tech 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Maint Coord Public Util 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 1 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sr Warehouse Operator 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Office Tech 11 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sr. Utilities Rep.Office/Technical 15 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sr. Communications Coordinator- 15 6.00 6.00 6.00 Public Util Industrial Electrician IV 26 6.00 6.00 6.00 Changed from Maintenance Electrician IV(22) Metal Fabrication Technician 22 3.00 3.00 3.00 Senior Water Dist System Operator 21 16.00 16.00 16.00 Senior Water System Maint Operator 21 16.00 16.00 16.00 312 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Waste Water Collection Lead Maint 21 6.00 6.00 6.00 Worker WW Lift Station Lead Worker 21 4.00 4.00 4.00 Drainage Maintenance Lead Worker 21 3.00 3.00 3.00 General Maintenance Worker III 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Pumps Maint Tech 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Concrete Finisher 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Irrigation Operator 20 4.00 4.00 4.00 Waste Water Lift Station Lead Wkr 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water System Maintenance Operator 1- 17-19 27.00 27.00 27.00 11 Water Meter Tech 1-111 18-19 6.00 6.00 6.00 Waste Water Coll Maint Worker 11 19 12.00 12.00 12.00 Drainage Maintenance Worker 111 19 9.00 9.00 11.00 2 New Positions Pumps Maintenance Technician 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Facility/Building Maint Wkr 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fleet Maintenance Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Waste Water Lift Station Maint Wkr 18 4.00 4.00 4.00 Irrigation Operator 11 17 4.00 4.00 4.00 Landscape Restoration Lead Wkr 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Landscaper 16 0.00 1.00 1.00 Facility/Building Maintenance Wkr 15 3.00 2.00 2.00 Water Distribution Valve Operator 15 8.00 8.00 8.00 Water Maintenance Support Wkr 14 2.00 2.00 2.00 Custodian 11 11 2.00 2.00 2.00 Maintenance Total 180.00 180.00 184.00 Water Reclamation Plant Water Reclamation Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 WRF Operations&Maint Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Water Rec Plant Operations& Maint Manager Regulatory Compliance Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Change from 33 to 34 WRF Maintenance Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Laboratory Program Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Laboratory Manager(29) Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Project Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Waste Water Business Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 W.W. Plant Maintenance Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Reclamation Facility Process 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Control Analyst WRF Office Administrator 21 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Office Manager(27) Changed from Water Reclamation Safety Safety Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Specialist(26) WRF Operations Supervisor 27 4.00 4.00 4.00 Grade changed from 26 to 27 313 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Water Reclamation Facility Lead 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operator Fats, Oils&Grease Program Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 26 to 27 Water Reclamation Planner Scheduler 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Program Support Coordinator (26) Instrumentation and Controls 25-28 3.00 3.00 3.00 Technician II-IV Senior Laboratory Chemist 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 26 to 30 Senior Industrial WW Pretreat Program 25 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed from Senior Pretreatment Inspect/ Permit Writer(26) Lab Chemist 24 2.00 2.00 2.00 Water Reclamation Facility Operator IV 23 4.00 4.00 4.00 Pretreatment Inspect/Permit Writer 23 4.00 4.00 4.00 Pretreatment Sr Sampler Inspect 19 2.00 2.00 4.00 2 New Positions; Change to Sr Pretreatment Sampler Inspector Office Facilitator II Non Union 20 1.00 0.00 0.00 Grade Changed from 19 to 20 Senior Warehouse Operator 15 2.00 2.00 2.00 Sr Utilities Representative-Office/ 15 2.00 2.00 2.00 Technical Industrial Electrician IV 26 2.00 2.00 2.00 Moved from Maintenance Electrician IV(22) HVAC Technician II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Waste Water Plant Maint. Operator IV 21 8.00 8.00 8.00 Water Reclamation Facility Operator III 21 17.00 17.00 17.00 Painter II 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 CMMS/Utilities Administrator 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Waste Water Preventative Maint Worker(19) Water Reclamation Plant Total 68.00 69.00 71.00 Finance Finance Administrator 39 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Manager III 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 3.00 4.00 1 Changed from Financial Analyst III (30) Customer Service Manager Public 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Utilities Accountant IV 29 3.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Accountant III (27) Grade change from 29 to 30; 1 Changed to Financial Analyst III 30 1.00 3.00 2.00 Financial Analyst IV(32) Water Metering Technologies Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accountant III 27 2.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Accountant IV(29) Water Metering Technologies 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Supervisor Billing Office Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Customer Services Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 23 to 25 Changed 9 from Sr. Utilities Rep.-Generalist Customer Service Accts/Coll Invent 18 6.00 6.00 22.00 (15); Changed 7 from Sr. Utilities Rep.- Customer Service(15) Sr. Utilities Rep.-Generalist 15 9.00 9.00 0.00 Changed to Customer Service Acct. Coll/Inves (18) Sr. Utilities Rep.-Customer Service 15 7.00 7.00 0.00 Changed to Customer Service Acct. Coll/Inves (18) 314 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Senior Advanced Metering 21 0.00 0.00 4.00 Infrastructure Advanced Metering Infrastructure Tech 19 700 700 300 Changed 4 to Senior Advanced Metering . . . II Infrastructure Tech(21) Water Meter Reader III 18 2.00 2.00 2.00 Water Meter Reader II 15 5.00 5.00 5.00 Grade Change from 14 to 15 Finance Total 50.00 51.00 51.00 Water Quality&Treatment Water Quality&Treatment 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Administrator Water Treatment Plant Systems Changed to Water Treatment Plant Systems Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager from Water Treatment Plant Manager Water Treatment Plant Systems 31 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to Water Treatment Plant Systems Assistant Manager Assistant Manager L&C Cross Connection Control 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Manager Regulatory Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Change from 30 to 33 Watershed Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Change from 30 to 33 Storm Water Quality Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Change from 30 to 33 Water Treatment Plant Assistant 30 1.00 0.00 0.00 Manager Lead and Copper X Connection 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Lead and Copper Supervisor Supervisor Project Manager 27 1.00 0.00 0.00 Water Treatment Plant Facility 30 3.00 3.00 3.00 Changed from WTP Facility Manager/ Manager Supervisor(27) Watershed Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Storm Water Compliance Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cross Connection Control Manager 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Treatment Plant Lead Oper 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Watershed Special Projects 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator Storm Water Quality Coordinator 23 3.00 3.00 3.00 Cross Connections Control Coord 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Storm Water Technician II Union 22 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead and Copper Technician 21 0.00 2.00 2.00 Water Quality Technician 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed from Storm Water Technician Union (21) Cross Connections Control Technician 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Cross Connections Control Inspector Quality Assur Sr Samp Cl Water 17 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lead Watershed Ranger 23 4.00 4.00 4.00 Grade Changed from 21 to 23 Watershed Ranger 22 4.00 4.00 4.00 Grade Changed from 19 to 22 Water Plant Operator II 21 25.00 25.00 25.00 Water Quality&Treatment Admin 56.00 58.00 58.00 Total Water Resources 315 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Water Resources Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Utilities Water Rights, Contracts and 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Property Manager PU Sustainability Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sustainability Program Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Conservation Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Resources Eng/Scientist 27 2.00 1.00 1.00 Hydrologist 1 27 0.00 1.00 1.00 Water Rights&Property Agent 26 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Property&Water Contracts Asst(20) Property&Water Contracts Asst 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Water Rights&Property Agent (26) Hydrology Specialist Union 23 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Position Conservation Technician 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 23 to 26 PU Records Prog Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Resources Total 11.00 11.00 12.00 Engineering Chief Engineer- Public Utilities 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineer III-VII 29-36 23.00 23.00 25.00 Changed to Engineer II-VII; 2-VII,6-VI,3-V,4-IV, 1-11; 2 New Positions Engineer IV's(31) Sr Water Treatment Engineer 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Project Control Specialist 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Construction Program/ 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Projects Manager Project Coordinator 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position Engineering Tech II -VI 19-27 17.00 19.00 19.00 14 of 19 filled;4 vacant as Tech V's Engineering Tech IV-VI 23-27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Tech III-V 21-24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Eng Contracts Coord Public Util 22 2.00 2.00 2.00 Engineering Tech III 21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Tech 11 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Document Controls Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Administrative Secretary 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Tech 1 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contracts Process Coordinator 17 1.00 1.00 1.00 Contracts Technician 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Total 48.00 50.00 53.00 Street Lighting Engineer V 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Engineering Tech IV 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engineering Tech 111 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 316 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document Grades FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Changes from FY2023 to FY2024 Engineering Tech 1 17 0.00 0.00 0.00 Street Lighting Total 2.00 2.00 2.00 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT TOTAL 451.00 459.00 475.00 Street Lighting Fund 2.72 2.72 2.57 Water Utility Fund 283.16 288.16 298.21 Sewer Utility Fund 126.55 127.65 130.80 Storm Water Utility Fund 39.57 40.47 43.42 DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY Waste&Recycling Division Refuse Fund Waste&Recycling Div Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Financial Manager 1 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Waste&Recycling Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Special Projects Analyst and Safety 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator W&R Operations Supervisor 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 W&R Permit Coordinator 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 WR Program Lead 20 2.00 2.00 2.00 Waste&Recycling Equip Op II 18 29.00 29.00 29.00 Senior Equipment Operator 19 4.00 4.00 4.00 Lead Equipment Operator 20 3.00 3.00 3.00 Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 W&R Education Specialist 1-11 16-19 0.00 5.00 5.00 Office Tech 11 15 3.00 3.00 3.00 W&R Education Specialist 15 5.00 0.00 0.00 Container Maintenance Worker 14 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 New Position Waste&Recycling Total 56.00 56.00 57.00 Environ&Energy Division Refuse Fund Sustainability Envir Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sustainability Deputy Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sr Energy Climate Program Mgr 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sustainability Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 3.00 Grade changed from 29 to 30 Sustainability Program Manager 29 2.00 2.00 0.00 Sustainability Community Projects 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position Manager Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator 11 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Environ&Energy Division Refuse 7.00 7.00 8.00 Fund SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT 63.00 63.00 65.00 (Refuse Fund)TOTAL 317 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Staffing Document This page intentionally left blank 318 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 • Appendix — - o n o[a w 1@ w rt sic A31 x _L It� r,•.,,,. �/ '' o�l P.; +`� ��� -•v. Ji �4l � i�.� , jaf tir,fB WT l+.. lr, .j N�1.,� `'i. �<• :'�/. � R ��,f' .Cf{�`yd.. r1K r.. r�f�•yd .. �rv. ��fsb .�.,,� .y`��,��-iC� .± `fit. If -,..s -�a - �-� �...��� �� Y°� r' -.' IF .d,. - �'� ,y �+� ,' yJ. ^f-`' - .'� t i�.yf•'y�;� 1' �� �V {1}�F. q ,� p �{�,. � Ya1��i}�;-� .. ". i.I L('• � � Y- �':t Y, :.S lktr�' F��,,�� ,� ..\ k f r 7 .. "".-.� `.' l f'Y�• lam' This page intentionally left blank Salt Lake City Appendix The City Library Proposed Budget Affi- 4114 T J y,. M ' r p ' 1 321 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix The City Library By the Numbers 2022 New Cards Issued Gate Count 27,2,V 929,'r'1 Cards Received or Used By Cardholders Since 2018 Unique Users 152,756 88,426 Physical Materials Checked Out Storytime Attendance 2,517,961 7,500+ eBooks Checked Out Amount Saved by the Average Patron* 345,330 $326.31 eAudiobooks Checked Out Total Amount Saved by Patrons 428,829 $28,854,666.97 *among patrons who had at least one transaction in 2022 OSalt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 322 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix Contents Bythe Numbers...........................................................................2 Organizational Chart .....................................................................4 Letter from the Interim Executive Director&Board President ........5 StaffingProfile ..............................................................................6 Locations .....................................................................................8 BudgetOverview ..........................................................................9 General Fund Revenues ........................................................10-11 General Fund Expenditures and eMedia Usage .....................12-13 Debt Service Fund......................................................................14 Capital Project Fund ...................................................................15 a r IF 000 Alt. Random Acts of Opera performed at the Main Library Solt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 3O — 323 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix Organizational Chart Library Board I Interim Executive Director ........................•••••. Executive Admin Director of Marketing& Interim Deputy Director Communications I Director of Equity Director of Finance Director of Cuslomer B3cpedence and Organizational Development I Director of Administrative Manager Director of Facilities&it of Public Services Community Engagement Director of Circulation Manager Events Manager Human Resources Technology& Digital Equity Manager Service Coordinators Manager of Tech Services Children's Services &Collection Development Teen Services Adult Servlces Public Services Managers Children's Library Safety Manager Nonfiction&AV Fiction,Teens,&Periodicals Anderson-Foothill Ballpark Chapman Day-Riverside Glendale Marmalade Sprague Sweet . Executive Leadership Team (ELT) 4O Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 324 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix A letter from the Interim Executive Director & Board President March 2023 Mayor Mendenhall,City Council Members,and Residents of Salt Lake City, Every year during budget season,The City Library takes the opportunity to look to the future as we assess our organization's needs to maintain a 21 st-century Library.This year,the Library set three budgetary goals to achieve while working within current operating budget levels.All three of our goals relate to our most important resource,our staff. 1. Invest in competitive compensation and growth opportunities for Library employees through salaries and wages,employee benefits,and professional development. 2. Recruit and retain BIPOC employees. 3. Provide necessary resources for successful job fulfillment through adequate staffing capacities, supporting budgets,training resources,and physical spaces. The City Library prides itself on its fiscal responsibility,and recognizes that capital projects require large investments of money and time.We have four significant capital projects to focus on this upcoming fiscal year. 1. Main's roof renovation will be a large-scale,involved project.Not only will the behind-the-scenes waterproofing and structural supports be improved,but we will refresh the rooftop into a community-centric,well-shaded,sustainable,and safe space for the enjoyment of the entire city. 2. We will ensure healthy and safe spaces by investing in maintaining and upgrading critical building components.These include fire suppression systems,HVAC,electrical,sewer,and water systems. 3. We will continue to move forward in establishing a physical presence in the Ballpark neighborhood. 4. Lastly,we are working to move forward with the recommendations detailed in our Master Facilities Plan.We are pursuing long-term solutions for the Anderson-Foothill Branch and the Main Library, and determining the most impactful investments we can make on the west-side. As we are in the midst of celebrating our 125th anniversary,this budget further solidifies our place as a cornerstone of the community throughout our long history.We are looking forward to expanding our services,working alongside community members to detail our future,and carrying on the legacy of the dedicated Library staff who came before us.As our Culture Statement declares, "We work together to make lives better"and I'm confident that our budget supports this continued commitment. Thank you for your continued support, v. ' Debbie Ehrman . Adam Weinacker Interim Executive Director Library Board President Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 O - 325 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix Staffing Profile Position FY23 FY24 Difference The FY24 Budget is an overall decrease Accountant 1 1 — of 0.2 FTE. Accounting Specialist 1 1.45 0.45 Proposed Staffing Additions: Administrative Assistant 0.475 0.475 — •Financial Services&Human Resources Administrative Manager 1 1 — •A supervisor to redefine our substitute Assistant Director 7 7 — employee processes Assistant Manager 4 4 — •Two part-time Passport Assistants Associate Librarian 21.425 20.8 -0.625 Proposed Staffing Reductions: Audio Visual Specialist 1 1 — •Shift 3FTEsto contract custodial Cataloger 1 1 — services Circulation Supervisor 2 2 — Community Gardener Associate 0.45 0.45 — Copy Editor&Public Relations 1 1 — Creative Director 1 1 — Custodial Manager 1 1 — Custodial Supervisor 2 2 Custodian 18.7 15.7 Data Analyst 1 1 Delivery Driver 1 1 — Deputy Director 1 1 — Equity&Org Development Associate 1 0 -1 Equity Coordinator 1 1 — Event Associate 1.45 1.45 — Executive Administrative Assistant 1 1 — Executive Director 1 1 — Graphic Designer 1 1 — Help Desk Tech 2 1 -1 Human Resource Associate 3 3.475 0.475 IT Tech 0 1 1 Jr. Designer 1 1 — Junior Project/Account Manager 0.475 0.475 — Librarian 41.45 42 0.55 Library Aide 21.15 19.775 -1 3- Library Assistant 42.3 42.725 0.42 Licensed Clinical Social Worker 1 1 — Literary Project Specialist 1 1 — Logistics Coordinator 1 1 — Maintenance Manager 1 1 — Maintenance Technician 5 5 — Maintenance Supervisor 1 1 — Manager 15 15 — Marketing&Comm Project Manager 1 1 — Network&Systems Engineer 1 1 — 0 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 326 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix Staffing Profile Continued Position FY23 FY24 Difference Organizational Development Coordinator 0 1 1 Passport Agent 0 0.9 0.9 Passport Supervisor 1 1 — Procurement&Contracts Manager 1 1 — Safety Associate 8.9 8.9 — Safety Manager 1 1 — Safety Supervisor 2 2 — Senior Network Support Technician 1 1 — Senior Software Support Engineer 1 1 — Service Coordinator 3 3 — Social Media Manager&Photographer 1 1 — Staff Development Coordinator 1 1 — Substitute Supervisor 0 1 1 Tech Services Specialists 2 2 — Technology Assistant 2.25 2.25 Technology Associate 2.425 2.425 Technology Librarian 1 1 Technology Coordinator 1 1 Trainer 0 1 1 Web Developer 1 1 Total 1242.45 242.25 -0.2 1 4b • F Catching up with superheroes in the Teen Lounge Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 O7 327 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix The City Library _ocations Main Library Glendale Branch 210 East400 South 1375 3ouih Concord 801-524-8200 801-594-8660 Anderson-Foothill Branch Marmalade Branch 1135 South 2100 East 260 best 500 North do 801-594-8611 801-594-8680 Ballpark Branch Sprague Branch Coming 2023 2131 South 1100 East 801-594-8640 \ Chapman Branch / 577 South 900 West Corinne&Jack Sweet 801-594-8623 Branch 455 F Street Day-Riverside Branch 801-594-8651 1575 West 1000 North 801-594-8632 91 MOW— \1\ I Birdwatching with a City Library Binocular Kit OSolt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 328 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix The City Library FY23-24 Budget Proposal Budget Overview \ \ • General Fund Proposed Budget-$33,012,370 1 1 • Increase of$4.41VI or 15.4% • Higher due to Capital Projects • Debt Service Fund Proposed Budget-$987,450 • Capital Project Fund Proposed Budget-$6,255,400 Expenditures / Pages 10& 11 Pages 12& 13 INV— i�"' ■ i �� ;' Debt Service Capitol Fund Projects J � Page 14 Page 15 f/} r _ J a t Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 O 329 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix General Fund Revenue FY23-24 Budget Proposal Significant Revenue Increases Transfer to Ccl.!`)Itr.ii Project Fund • $475,000 in property tax from new growth Transferred approximately$5.81VI . $365,000 from interest earnings Includes$1.511VI in designated facilities and technology . $84,500 from passport revenue funds Personnel $4.3M for Capital Projects • 3%increase for COLA and Longevity Fund Balance • -0.2 FTEs/3 new positions Projected fund balance at the end of FY23,is estimated • FT Supervisor of Substitute Staff-Partially funded to be 30%of the FY24 budget. by reallocating funds Projected fund balance at the end of FY24,is estimated • PTAccounting Specialist to be 16.7%of the FY24 budget. • PT HR Associate • 2 PT Passport Agents-Funded by projected revenue increase from expanded hours of Passport Services • 3 FTEs eliminated by custodial contract Tax Revenues Tax Year Tax Year Tax Year Tax Year Tax Year Tax Year This chart reflects the estimated property tax amount 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 est. for each$7 00,000 of residential property value and Certified .000757 .00,0741 .000680 000649 .000615 .0,00615 each S1,OOQ000 ofcommercial property value. Tax Tax Rate Year 2023 amounts are based on FY23 budgeted real Residential property $41.64 $40.76 $37.40 $35.70 $33.83 $33.83 and personal property tax revenue and a zero percent Commercial increase in 2022 property values. property $757.00 $741.00 $680.00 $649,00; $615.00 $615.00 Y LM Participants of the Teen Talks series 10 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budciet Fiscal Year 2024 330 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix FY23 FY23 FY24 FY24 -FY23 FY22 Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted Percent Accounts Actual Budget Budget Budget Difference Change REVENUES :3 mm TAX REVENUE \V CURRENT YEAR PROPERTY TAXES 19,281,689 22,348,440 22,348,440 22,786,365 437,925 2.0% PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES 2,349,424 1,892,085 1,892,085 1,929,160 37,075 2.0% T PROPERTY TAXES-PASS THROUGH 327,108 600,000 600,000 800,000 200,000 33.3% �^ DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES 439,588 420,000 420,000 450,000 30,000 7.1% MOTOR VEHICLE TAXES 795,125 735,000 735,000 800,000 65,000 8.8% JUDGM ENT LEVY 13.6,83.8 3.00,290 100,290 3.00,000 (290) -0.3% 1.L TOTAL TAX REVENUE 23,309,752 26,095,815 26,095,815 26,865,525 769,710 2.9% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE < GRANTS-FEDERAL 81,946 0 0 0 0 REIMBURSEMENTS-E RATE 43,470 35,000 35,000 23,700 (11,300) -32.3% GRANTS-STATE 100,287 47,000 53,000 47,000 0 0.0% RDA REBATE 968,166 1,000,000 1,000,000 900,000 (100,000) -10.0% �V TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,193,869 1,082,000 1,088,000 970,700 (111,300) -10.3% CHARGES FOR SERVICES PRINTER REVENUES 18,763 15,000 15,000 25,000 10,000 66.7% PASSPORT SERVICES 124,680 97,000 97,000 181,500 84,500 87.1% NON-RESIDENT FEES 15,649 14,000 14,000 16,000 2,000 14.3% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 159,092 126,000 126,000 222,500 96,500 76.6% CHARGES FOR LOST/DAMAGED ITEMS CHARGES FOR LOST/DAMAGED ITEMS 20,090 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% TOTAL CHARGES FOR LOST/DAMAGED ITEMS 20,090 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0.0% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE INTEREST EARNINGS (1,726) 80,000 80,000 445,000 365,000 456.3% RENTS-FACILITIES 3,830 15,000 15,000 9,500 (5,500) -36.7% RENTS-COMMERCIAL SPACE 90 28,000 28,000 33,105 5,105 18.2% SUNDRY REVENUES 49,586 26,000 26,000 26,000 0 0.0% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 51,780 149,000 149,000 513,605 364,605 244.7% CONTRIBUTIONS&TRANSFERS DONATIONS 104,380 67,000 67,000 2,500 (64,500) -96.3% TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS&TRANSFERS 104,380 67,000 67,000 2,500 (64,500) -96.3% FUND BALANCE APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE-APPROPRIATED 1,059,070 2,353,070 4,417,540 3,358,470 317.1% TOTAL FUND BALANCE APPROPRIATED 0 1,059,070 2,353,070 4,417,540 3,358,470 TOTAL REVENUES 24,838,963 28,598,985 29,898,885 33,012,370 4,413,485 15.4% Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 11 331 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix e�`_", eneral Fund Expenditures FY23-24 Budget Proposal FY23 FY23 FY24 FY24 -FY23 FY22 Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted Percent Accounts Actual Budget Budget Budget Difference Change EXPENDITURES PERSONNEL SALARIES&WAGES-REGULAR 10,451,978 12,383,400 12,225,810 12,858,000 474,600 3.8% OVERTIME-REGULAR 13,666 0 22,215 0 0 - SALARIES&WAGES-FLEX 151,046 204,995 205,730 146,000 (58,995) -28.8% SOCIAL SECURITY-REGULAR 777,686 948,600 938,445 984,900 36,300 3.9% SOCIAL SECURITY-FLEX 11,564 15,685 15,705 11,170 (4,515) -28.8% EMPLOYEE INSURANCE 1,476,562 2,405,900 2,374,430 2,316,500 (89,400) -3.7% RETIREE INSURANCE 21,600 21,600 21,600 20,400 (1,200) -5.6% STATE RETIREMENT 1,477,394 1,775,900 1,766,950 1,777,300 1,400 0.1% WORKERS COMPENSATION 31,140 42,420 41,885 38,600 (3,820) -9.0% UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.0% OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 64,244 111,125 111,830 119,065 7,940 7.1% EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION 7A15 12,960 12,960 13,000 40 0.3% TOTAL PERSONNEL 14,484,295 17,925,585 17,740,560 18,287,935 362,350 2.0% MATERIALS&SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTIONS&MEMBERSHIPS 30,404 35,715 37,650 45,705 9,990 28.0% PUBLICITY 166,393 260,795 260,795 203,570 (57,225) -21.9% TRAVEL&TRAINING 115,380 190,675 187,975 213,485 32,810 18.2% OFFICE SUPPLIES&EXPENSE 9,675 14,000 14,000 14,000 0 0.0% POSTAGE 29,196 25,500 25,500 30,500 5,000 19.6% SPECIAL DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES 352,584 408,480 384,780 402,930 (5,550) -1.4% PRINTER COPIER PAPER 6,377 7,000 7,000 8,000 1,000 14.3% PRINTER COPIER TONER 48,453 54,000 54,000 57,000 3,000 5.6% TOTAL MATERIALS&SUPPLIES 758,462 986,165 971,700 975,190 (10,975) -1.1% General Fund Significam LXpenditure Increases Buildings&Grounds: Collections: • Utilities-Significant increase in natural gas costs eBooks and eAudiobooks-To meet increased • Contract Services-Moved to a contract janitorial demand and costs service at the Main Library for consistent coverage e M ed i a Usage 400,000 2017-2022 n 2022: 300,000 _ •428,829 eAudiobooks •345,330 eBooks 200,000 $5.11 is the average cost for a paperback fiction 100,000 $43.12 is the average cost for eMedia 0 eAudio -IF eBooks 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 12 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 332 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix FY23 FY23 FY24 FY24-FY23 FY22 Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted Percent Accounts Actual Budget Budget Budget Difference Change ( I EXPENDITURES \V BUILDINGS,GROUNDS&EQUIPMENT FUEL 11,185 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0.0% \V MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT&FURNITURE 193,584 298,620 298,620 270,390 (28,230) -9.5% __S MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES 19,556 12,000 12,000 10,500 (1,500) -12.5% (Q MAINTENANCE-BUILDINGS&GROUNDS 621,721 521,600 677,235 755,550 233,950 44.9% UTILMESBOILER OPERATIONS 110,955 75,000 75,000 115,000 40,000 53.3% �� UTILITIES ELECTRICITY 437,068 454,500 454,500 439,000 (15,500) -3.4% UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 101,867 94,000 94,000 199,500 105,500 112.2% UTILITIES-CITY SERVICES 74,835 92,700 92,700 94,500 1,800 1.991. UTILITIES-GARBAGE 36,255 36,795 36,795 39,600 2,805 7.6% UTILITIESTELECOMMUNICATIONS 113,547 135,000 135,000 118,855 (16,145) -12.0% T TOTAL BUILDINGS,GROUNDS&EQUIPMENT 1,720,573 1,732,215 1,887,850 2,054,895I 322,680 19.6% X SERVICES M0 PROFESSIONAL&TECHNICAL SERVICES 120,780 170,200 157,750 123,700 (46,500) -27.3% SECURITY CONTRACTS 26,354 36,000 39,500 45,250 9,250 25.7% TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTS 315,947 453,330 471,330 592,765 139,435 30.891 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 24,153 35,500 35,500 30,500 (5,000) -14.19'. yu CATALOGING CHARGES 95,901 102,000 102,000 102,000 0 0.01y. STAFF TRAINING&DEVELOPMENT 34,640 50,000 50,000 64,040 14,040 28.1% PROGRAMMING 264,041 296,790 294,290 304,895 8,105 2.7% BOARD DEVELOPMENT 1,518 7,000 7,000 7,000 0 0.0% N INTERLIBRARY LOANS 183 500 500 S00 0 0.0% TOTAL SERVICES 883,517 1,151,320 1,157,870 1,270,650 119,330 10.4% OTHER CHARGES INSURANCE 359,263 396,400 396,400 439,100 42,700 10.8% RENTS 90,000 90,000 0 (90,000) -100.W. SUNDRY EXPENSE 23,619 87,500 87,500 25,400 (62,100) -71.0% EXECUTIVE DISCRETION 6,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 5,000 33.3% STAFF INNOVATION 973 5,000 5,000 0 (5,000) -100.0% TalAL OTHER CHARGES 389,855 593,900 593,900 484,500 (109,400) -18.4% COLLECTIONS&CAPITAL OUTLAYS LAND 0 0 1,300,000 0 0 - BUILDINGS 127,475 142,000 142,000 0 (142,000) -100.0% IMPROVEMENTS 12,018 0 24,000 0 0 - EQUIPMENT 12,485 0 1,740 0 0 - FURNISHINGS 0 20,000 20,565 0 (20,000) -100.0% TECHNOLOGY 0 0 5,000 0 0 - PRINT MATERIALS 690,930 659,000 659,000 745,000 86,000 13.1% AUDIO MATERIALS 48,450 55,000 55,000 50,000 (5,000) -9.191. VISUAL MATERIALS 227,525 350,000 350,000 285,000 (65,000) -18.6% DATABASES 201,403 235,000 235,000 210,000 (25,000) -10.6% E BOOKS&AUDIO 735,718 690,000 690,000 875,000 185,000 26.8% NEWSPAPERS&MAGAZINES 92,688 100,000 100,000 100,000 0 0.0% TOTAL COLLECTIONS&CAPITAL OUTLAYS 2,138,692 2,251,000 3,582,305 2,265,000 14,000 0.6% TRANSFERS,GRANTS&DONATIONS TRANSFERTO CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 1,813,500 2,271,500 2,271,500 5,841,700 3,570,200 157.2% TRANSFERTO DEBTSERVICE FUND 906,944 1,035,200 1,035,200 985,500 (49,700) -4.8% PAYMENTSTO OTHER GOVERNMENTS 327,108 600,000 600,000 800,000 200,000 33.3% GRANTS-FEDERAL 45,248 0 0 0 0 - GRANTS-STATE 102,316 47,000 53,000 47,000 0 0.090 DONATIONS 747 5,000 5,000 0- (5,000) -100.01Y. TOTAL TRANSFERS,GRANTS&DONATIONS 3,195,863 3,958,700 3,964,700 7,674,200 3,715,500 93.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23,571,257 28,598,895 29,898,885 33,012,370+. 4,413,485 15.4% REVENUES OVER(UNDER)EXPENDITURES 1,267,706 0 0 Q' 0 13 333 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix Debt Service Fund FY23-24 Budget Proposal FY23 FY23 FY24 FY24-FY23 FY22 Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted Percent Accounts Actual Budget Budget Budget Difference Change REVENUES INTEREST (7,727) 0 0 0 0 - TRANSFERS 906,944 1,035,200 1,035,200 985,500 (49,700) -4.8% FUND BALANCE-APPROPRIATED 0 3,500 3,500 1,950 (1,550) -44.3% TOTAL REVENUES 899,217 1,038,700 1,038,700 987,450 (51,250) -4.9% EXPENDITURES INTEREST PAYMENTS 300,808 403,700 403,700 181,850 (221,850) -55.0% PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS 600,000 630,000 630,000 801,600 171,600 27.2% ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 3,387 5,000 5,000 4,000 (1,000) -20.0% FUND BALANCE-UNAPPROPRIATED 0 0 0 0 0 - TOTAL EXPENDITURES 904,195 1,038,700 1,038,700 987,450 (51,250) -4.9% REVENUES OVER(UNDER)EXPENDITURES (4,978) 0 0 0 0 Debt Service Fund • Lower because the City refinanced the Glendale and Marmalade Branch bonds ' 4 i +. ,fig r .eny'" % �: fir,.. .w• �«,,�.d,� ti yyy111 Over 10,000 music fans visited Library Square for the 2022 Kilby Block Party 14 Solt Lake City Public library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 334 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Salt Lake City Appendix Capital Project Fund FY23-24 Budget Proposal FY23 FY23 FY24 FY24-FY23 FY22 Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted Percent Accounts Actual Budget Budget Budget Difference Change REVENUES INTEREST (18,145) 35,000 35,000 0 (35,000) -100.0% SUNDRY REVENUES 1,527 0 0 0 0 - TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND 1,813,500 2,271,500 2,271,500 5,841,700 3,570,200 157.2% FUND BALANCE-APPROPRIATED 0 1,595,000 4,774,670 413,700 (1,181,300) -74.1% TOTAL REVENUES 1,796,882 3,901,500 7,081,170 6,255,400 2,353,900 60.3% EXPENDITURES CAP OUTLAY-BUILDI NGS 347,290 2,350,000 5,212,050 5,198,500 2,848,500 121.2% CAP OUTLAY-IMPROVEMENTS 210,821 69,500 196,025 0 (69,500) -100.0% CAP OUTLAY-EQUIPMENT 54,861 162,000 220,350 5,400 (156,600) -96.7% CAP OUTLAY-FURNISHINGS 158,020 137,000 259,710 20,000 (117,000) -85.4% CAP OUTLAY-TECHNOLOGY 467,297 1,183,000 1,187,535 1,031,500 (151,500) -12.8% CAP OUTLAY-FOOTHILL BRANCH RESTRICTED 0 0 5,500 0 0 FUND BALANCE-UNAPPROPRIATED 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,238,289 3,901,500 7,081,170 6,255,400 2,353,900 60.3% REVENUES OVER(UNDER)EXPENDITURES 558,593 0 0 0 0 Major Capital Projects • $3.75M for the Main Library roof project • $400,000 for PC server and network replacements • $500,000 for a new cooling tower at the Main Library • $300,000 for Ballpark renovations and collections— . $400,000 for the Master Facilities Plan Concept carried over from FY23 Development • $250,000 additional to acquire and implement an HRIS • Anderson-Foothill Branch,Main Library&create a • $200,000 to expand and enhance the camera security west-side plan system Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget,Fiscal Year 2024 15 335 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPONOW The CityLibrary Y � THE SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM V n Y V �25�5 EST'logs The City Library THE SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM Med ical and Dental Plan Rateshuman resources Medical Plan Summit Star HDHP City Cost Employee Cost(Pre Tax) City Contribution to HSA (Or HRA if ineligible for HSA) Single 219.49 11.55 $750 Double 493.86 25.99 $1,500 Family 658.45 34.66 $1,500 NOTE:No additional HSA/HRA contributions will be given or deducted for mid-year changes that affect your enrollment status Dental Plans Preferred Choice Employee Cost(Pre-Tax) Premium Choice Employee Cost(Pre-Tax) Single 15.99 Single 18.79 Double 33.30 Double 39.18 Family 45.54 Family 53.60 Am I Eligible for an HSA? You must meet the following IRS criteria to be eligible to have an HSA. If you can check every box below,then YES, you are eligible: • You are enrolled in the STAR HDHP • You are not covered by another medical plan, UNLESS it is another qualified HDHP • (spouse and children may have any other type of coverage) • You or your spouse are not participating in an FSA, or the balances will be zero on or before June 30 You are not enrolled in any Medicare plan(including Part A) • You are not enrolled in TRICARE • You are not claimed as a dependent of another taxpayer *If you do not qualify for an HSA,your City contribution will be frontloaded into an H RA.See page 10 for details. • 0 V� HealthEquity '�— Building Health Savings" 337 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Term Life , . . , Coverage resourceshuman LL Additional Term Life Coverage Te,m -fe Coverage educe,hevinning a'age 70 ii'i I I 1""� IF111 150,000 200,000 0,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 Under Age30 0.55 1.10 2.21 3.31 4.42 5.52 6.63 7.73 8.84 9.94 11.05 Age 30-34 0.60 1.20 2.39 3.59 4.79 5.98 7.18 8.38 9.57 10.77 11.97 Age 35-39 0.83 1.66 3.31 4.97 6.63 8.29 9.94 11.60 13.26 14.91 16.57 Age 40-44 1.01 2.03 4.05 6.08 8.10 10.13 12.15 14.18 16.20 18.23 20.25 Age 45-49 1.93 3.87 7.73 11.60 15.47 19.33 23.20 27.06 30.93 34.80 38.66 Age 50-54 2.35 4.69 9.39 14.08 18.78 23.47 28.17 32.86 37.56 42.25 46.95 Age 55-59 3.73 7.46 14.91 22.37 29.83 37.28 44.74 52.19 59.65 67.11 74.56 Age 60-69 6.31 12.61 25.22 37.84 50.45 63.06 75.67 88.28 100.89 113.50 126.11 t Age 70,rates remain the same and coverage decreases Age 70-74 1,00 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 175,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 250,000 Age 75 and over 6,250 12,500 25,000 37,500 50,000 62,500 75,000 87,500 100,000 112,500 125,000 AD&D Coverage Dependent Term Life AD&D coverage ceases at age 70 One premium regardless of number of children Coveragel Individual Plan Family Plan s C.ver.geAmount Employee Cost Amount L�Bn ii-Weekly Cost Bi-Weekly Co It 25,000 $0.23 $0.35 $5,000 1 $0.24 50,000 $0.46 $0.69 S10,000 $0.48 75,000 $0.69 $1.04 S15,000 $0.72 100,000 $0.92 $1.38 Accident Medical Expense 125,000 $1.15 $1.73 You must be enrolled in Optional AD&D 150,000 $1.38 $2.07 175,000 $1.61 $2.42 200,000 $1.84 $2.76 $2,500 $0.54 225,000 $2.07 $3.11 250,000 S2.30 $3.45 Accident Weekly Indemnity You must be enrolled in Optional AD&D Long Term Disability Coverage in - Ws-tem PT.Ald.r VNImployee Cost Amount Bi-Weekly Cost Bi-Weekly Cost- 250and under $25 $0.12 Tier I and II Public 251 to 599 $50 $0.24 Employees Employer Paid 600to700 $75 $0.35 The Hartford 701 to 875 S100 $0.46 Tier I Firefighters The Hartford Employer Paid 876to 1,050 $125 $0.58 Tier 11 Fire Fighters 1,051 to 1,200 $150 $0.70 PEHP Employer Paid 1,201 to 1,450 $175 $0.81 Tier I and II Sworn Police Employer Paid 1,451 to 1,600 $200 $0.93 The Hartford 1,601 to 1,800 S225 $1.04 1,801 to 2,164 $250 $1.16 2,165 to 2,499 $300 $1.39 2,500 to 2.899 $350 $1.62 2,900 to 3,599 S400 $1.86 3,600 and over $500 $2.32 338 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Item 131 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023 RE: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment PLNPCM2022-00529 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ,,, ,V I'n u ,,,,, Item Schedule: Briefing:April 4,2023 TO: City Council Members Set Date:April 4,2023 Public Hearing:April 18,2023& FROM: Brian Fullmer May 2,2023 Policy Analyst Potential Action: May 16,2023 DATE: May 2, 2023 RE: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment PLNPCM2022-00529 PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE Four people spoke at the April 18, 2023 public hearing. Commenters stated the FB-UN2 zoning district is a blank check for developers and is inappropriate for use in historic districts with lower density if additional limitations are not included.A desire to restrict changes in this text amendment to areas shown in the Administration's map was expressed. Additional comments included a caution about a future lack of water if the city continues to grow,and a request for City oversight of development projects that remove single-family homes.There needs to be a balance between growth and preservation of neighborhoods. A former Planning staff member expressed general support for the plan,but noted the G-MU zone was written specifically to be the forefront of downtown and not a wall blocking the city skyline.There have been historic policies of maintaining the view corridor to the LDS Temple from I-15 and I-8o and he requested criteria be included in design review to consider impacts development could have on this view corridor. A written comment asked the Council to keep the io-foot stepback rule above 35 feet in FB-UN2 zone near residential areas with a maximum height of 35 feet.The new proposal reduces the required stepback to 30 feet.The commenter thinks that the existing rule is better for creating a smoother transition in height when near zoning districts like RMF-35- The Council continued the public hearing to a future meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 The following information was provided for the April 4, 2023 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. BRIEFING UPDATE Following a presentation from Design Workshop,the Council expressed general support for the proposed changes to building heights and pedestrian engagement.Council Members discussed the proposed minimum ten-foot sidewalk width for new development or redeveloped properties. Comments included a desire for wider sidewalks depending on building height to enhance the pedestrian experience. Consistency in sidewalk width was also discussed.The consultant and Planning staff clarified the proposed ten-foot sidewalk width is a minimum,and additional width could be discussed at the design review stage.The intent was to balance the need for appropriate sidewalk width without creating an overly open feel in some downtown areas with very wide streets. If a public right-of-way is not wide enough to accommodate a ten-foot sidewalk,a portion of it would be required on private property. It was noted that there will be inconsistencies when a property is developed or redeveloped with ten-foot sidewalks,but an adjacent property would not have the same requirement unless or until it is redeveloped. Maximum height differences in the Depot District and Granary were also discussed.There is an opportunity to provide additional housing in the more industrial Granary neighborhood,but capping height lower than in the Depot District would make it more difficult to include affordable housing units. Planning staff stated there is a desire to strike a balance between existing warehouses in the Granary District that will hopefully be preserved through adaptive reuse, and very tall buildings being built on adjacent or nearby properties.Affordable housing in these areas is difficult because of what can be developed by right.Some additional height through the design review process is an incentive to include affordable housing. Pedestrian amenities were also discussed,with a desire for ground floor commercial space serving the community rather than a gym,leasing office,etc.for building resident use.There was also a request to include bird-friendly glass in the building. Planning staff noted that can be included in the ordinance. The April 18, 2023 public hearing does not include an option for online comments.The Council may consider continuing the public hearing to a future meeting to provide an additional opportunity for comments. As a reminder,the following straw polls were included below in this report. Staff will reach out to you for your input on these and the policy question about UTA's request to maximize building height in the G-MU district to accommodate redevelopment plans. 1. Does the Council support Planning staffs recommendation to remove the step back requirement for buildings in the D-1(Central Business District)zone? 2. Does the Council support the current requirement of a 15'step back for buildings in the Sugar House Business District(CSHBD)that are taller than 45'? 3. Does the Council support requiring buildings in the CSHBD that abut single-or two-family zoning districts include a step back at 30'? 4. Does the Council support other changes as recommended by Planning Staff(parking,landscaping requirements,etc.)? Page 12 The following information was provided for the April 4, 2023 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about proposed amendments to the City's zoning ordinance pertaining to building heights and pedestrian engagement in the Downtown Plan area.The city worked with a consultant,Design Workshop,on the proposal. Proposed changes would affect the following zoning districts as shown in the image below: • D-1(Downtown Central Business District) • D-2 (Downtown Support) • D-3(Downtown Warehouse) • DA(Downtown Secondary Business District) • G-MU(Gateway Mixed Use) • CG(General Commercial) • FB-UN-1/2 (Form-Based Urban Neighborhood 1 and 2) The Administration's proposal also recommends changes to the Design Standards found in Chapter 21A.37, and the Design Review process found in Chapter 21A.59 of Salt Lake City Code. The proposal includes three main elements: Pedestrian Orientation,Human Scale Design, and Building Height.These are summarized below. Please see the attached presentation from Planning staff and Design Workshop to view a presentation the Planning Division provided that outlines the key changes. Pedestrian Orientation Under the proposal an area is considered pedestrian oriented if sidewalks and public spaces feel safe, welcoming, and free of barriers to those walking or using a wheelchair. Human Scale Design The proposal calls for development to be scaled toward humans through building form,visual interest,first floor activation,fagade transparency, overhead elements,setbacks, and public access points. Building Height Building heights may be adjusted and will be considered as they preserve visual corridors,reflect the character of downtown's individual districts,and include public benefits for height bonuses. Page 13 r I rC K Temple Square t Paw* I 1 Depot Di Cb*$I ausi lien EA ict 11 y 400 5 r� I ■ r jr A- � II I)Wft t The GramM U - sout State Downtown Plan Boundaries and Zoning Districts Image Courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division ADDITIONAL INFORMATION After the Planning Commission forwarded its recommendation and Planning staff was preparing the ordinance in coordination with the Attorney's Office,they identified a few changes they would like to ask the Council to consider including the final ordinance: • Design standards for the D-i(Central Business District)zoning district.The draft ordinance includes an upper floor step back of io'for buildings between 78'-104'and 15'for buildings taller than 104'. Step backs were introduced to additional districts outside the Sugar House Business District(CSHBD)and Form Based Urban Neighborhood-2(FB-UN2)to encourage additional light and air in higher density districts. o Planning staff doesn't believe the D-1(Central Business District)warrants a step back to this degree and recommends the Council remove this requirement,given the distinct feel of the downtown core. Page 14 • Clarification in the Sugar House Business District(CSHBD)and Form Based Urban Neighborhood(FB-UN)design standards.The draft ordinance includes a 15'step back for buildings in the CSHBD districts taller than 60'. o Planning staff recommends eliminating changes from the current step back requirement for buildings taller than 45'. For buildings in the CSHBD that abut single-or two-family districts Planning recommends a step back be incorporated at 30'. • Omission of requirement for buildings in the Form Based Urban Neighborhood(FB-UN)zones taller than 30'to include a 15'step back was omitted in an earlier draft ordinance. o Planning Staff corrected that omission in the current draft ordinance. • The recently adopted off-street parking ordinance is also being amended as part of this proposal due to language in the draft ordinance limiting size and location of surface parking in the Downtown(D-1,D-2,D-3, and D-4)and General Commercial(CG)zones. o Planning staff is recommending those changes be included in the draft ordinance. • Changes to the Form Based District and Design Standards chapters in City Code making standards for the FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 consistent with the proposed FB-UN3 form-based zoning district being considered by the Council. o Proposed changes to open space landscaping requirements discussed during the Council briefing for the FB-UN3 zone are included. Goal of the briefing:Review the proposed text amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POTENTIAL STRAW POLLS 1. Does the Council support Planning staffs recommendation to remove the step back requirement for buildings in the D-1(Central Business District)zone? 2. Does the Council support the current requirement of a 15'step back for buildings in the Sugar House Business District(CSHBD)that are taller than 45'? 3. Does the Council support requiring buildings in the CSHBD that abut single-or two-family zoning districts include a step back at 30'? 4. Does the Council support other changes as recommended by Planning Staff(parking,landscaping requirements,etc.)? POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Additional height beyond what is allowed"by right"may be included through design review and would require a public benefit.The Council may wish to ask the Administration to specify what these benefits are and how they can be quantified and tracked for compliance(affordable housing for example). 2. The Council may wish to discuss minimum building heights and potential impacts they may have on developing some smaller parcels. 3. The draft ordinance includes changes to the Form Based District and Design Standards chapters of City Code that include FB-UN3 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood 3)the Council has been briefed about but has not yet adopted.These changes would make FB-UN3 zoning regulations consistent with proposed changes to the FB-UN1 and 2 zones.These include changes to open space landscaping requirements the Council discussed during the FB-UN3 briefing.The Council may Page 15 wish to ask the Administration for their recommendation on how to move forward without creating any text inconsistencies. 4. The Council may wish to discuss and consider the request from UTA to amend the proposal to maximize allowable height in the GMU district to accommodate redevelopment plans proximate to a potential future UTA headquarters(see chart at the end of this staff report for a comparison of building heights proposed in different downtown zones). PUBLIC PROCESS Design Workshop, consultants for the proposal,held several stakeholder meetings with community council representatives,members of the development community,business and advocacy representatives,the Downtown Alliance, and the Disability and Accessibility Commission.Feedback from these meetings helped guide the proposal. In addition,a citywide survey gathered more than 45o responses from the broader community. Stakeholder Zoom Meetings were held with the following: • Chambers of Commerce and Development Community-November 30, 2021 • Community Council representatives-December 1, 2021 • Community representatives,including members of the Disability and Accessibility Commission- December 2, 2021 • Downtown Alliance-January 19, 2022 The public survey was published on Planning's website,listserv,Instagram,Twitter, and Facebook.The survey was open for three weeks and closed February 24, 2022. Notice was mailed to property owners within the Downtown Plan area May 13, 2022. The Planning Commission was briefed on the proposal at its June 8, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing August 18, 2022 at which one person spoke expressing support.The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation on the amendments to the City Council. The Utah Transit Authority(UTA)sent the attached letter to the Council expressing a desire for additional height in the Gateway Mixed Use(GMU)zone beyond what is in the proposal. UTA is preparing to redevelop property near the North Temple and Salt Lake Central Stations.These plans include relocating UTA's headquarters and potentially construct as many additional floors to the building as allowed by the City,and what the market will support. UTA asked to further increase allowed height or eliminate the minimum allowed height in the GMU zoning district. Current and Proposed Building Heights Zoning District Current Proposed Existing Proposed Minimum Minimum Maximum Maximum Height Height Height Height D-1 100' 100' 375'Corner Lots None Central Business District 10o mid-block >200,subject to conditions and design review Page 6 D-2 65 65 120' 120'with conditions Downtown Support District D-3 75' 75' go' 18o'with conditions Downtown Warehouse D-4 N/A N/A 75' 75' Downtown 120'-375' 120'—375' Secondary Central in permitted in permitted Business District locations locations'subject to conditions and design review GMU 45' 75' 75'flat roofs Buildings over go'up Gateway District to 18o'are subject to 200 South r Mixed-use 25 along r o oofs non-flat design review Corridor CG 6o' 75' General Commercial go'subject to (76'-150'in Granary design review District with design review.) (76'-105'outside Granary District with design review.) FBD N/A N/A 30 50' Form Based District 1-The area bounded by South Temple,West Temple,20o South,and 200 West Page 7 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' ��� y and NEIGHBORHOODS Q' == Blake Thomas cc Director Cl CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL L,5 (Dec22,202212:08 MST) Date Received: 12/22/2022 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 12/22/2022 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 22, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community&Neighborhoods OW f Z__ SUBJECT: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Kelsey Lindquist, Planning Manager kelsey.lindquist(a�slcgov.com or 385-226-7227 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Salt Lake City Planning Division was awarded a Transportation Land Use Connection Grant from the Wasatch Regional Council in 2021 to update sections of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to building heights and pedestrian engagement in the Downtown Plan area. The consultant, Design Workshop, worked with stakeholders and the city to develop a proposal that updates portions of the Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to building heights, review processes, and pedestrian spaces downtown. These code amendments aim to accommodate growth and respond to development pressures while developing standards for public spaces that improve the livability of the downtown area. Changes seek to promote future downtown growth that is safe, links land use with transportation to reduce vehicle trips, aligns building height with construction types in the building code, and encourages downtown living. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 The city's adopted plans and policies provide a basis for this proposal. The plans include both the citywide plan, Plan Salt Lake (2015) and the Downtown Plan(2016). These plans were adopted by the City Council after extensive engagement and review by the public and city boards and commissions. The proposal is consistent with a number of principals, objectives, and policies in both plans. 1 I N TEMPLE Temple Square ! Salt Palace IN � y 1 ~ la z 100 S 1 �w 1 200 S 1— IV) 1— Depot Dbffl t s iI Gentral Business District I C 4JJ S_ GrD6"Dl I i t Grand Boulevards District 1 I C UJ The Granary Central Ninth � t Downtown Plan Boundaries and Zoning Districts The above map illustrates the number of zoning districts within the Downtown Plan Area, as well as the number of distinct neighborhoods. The following zoning districts impacted by this proposal, include: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB-UN1 and 2. Additionally, the Design Standards (21A.37) and the Design Review process (21A.59) are being amended as part of this project. Summary of Proposed Amendments: Downtown Districts (D-1, D-2, D-3 & D-4) The draft introduced consistent language for all four downtown districts, and includes the following proposals within the downtown area: • Eliminating the need for design review for all conditional uses allowed in the downtown districts. • Limiting the location and size of surface parking lots to two double loaded parking aisles no more than 10 parking spaces wide. The surface parking lot location is limited to behind the building. • Prohibiting parking lots, structures, or garages as a principal use,when they result in the demolition of a building. • Standards for midblock walkways, which include a minimum 15' wide walkway with 6' unobstructed pedestrian path. These standards include the introduction of allowed encroachments into the midblock walkway. • Sidewalk standards of a minimum of 10'. D-1 (Central Business District)Amendments • Introduction of a maximum of 8' front or corner side yard. If a yard is provided, the yard must include one of the following pedestrian elements: o Seating at a ratio of one bench for every 500 square feet o Increase of 25% in the total number of trees required o Awning or similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5' in width and length from all street facing building entrances • Eliminated the distinction between block corners and midblock lots. • Changing the height threshold for design review to 200' on all properties in the zone compared to the current standard of 100' for midblock properties and 375' for corner properties. • Built in exceptions to the minimum height requirement of 100'. These exceptions include: o Utility buildings o Accessory building and structures that serve public transportation, downtown improvement districts or public maintenance o Buildings on lots less than 5,000 square feet • Glass buildings in excess of 100' must have a stepback between the first floor and 150'. • Buildings in excess of 200' are allowed through the Design Review process and require compliance with one of the identified options: o Inclusion of a midblock walkway o Inclusion of the affordable housing incentives o Exceeding the requirements for ground floor use and visual interest o Providing a restrictive covenant for a building older than 50 years and not currently listed as a local landmark site o Providing a minimum of 500 square feet of open space that is privately owned but publicly accessible • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement for existing design standards. The amendments include the following: o Upper floor reflective glass limitation o Upper floor stepback o Dimensions between building entrances o Maximum blank wall limitation o Tree canopy coverage percentage requirements o Minimum vegetation standards o Street trees o Soil volume o Curb cut reduction o Overhead cover o Streetscape landscaping o Horizontal articulation D-2 Downtown Support)Amendments • Requiring a minimum setback of 8' and maximum of 16' for residential developments. If the maximum setback is provided, the development must include one of the pedestrian features listed(see the list under the first bullet for D-1). • Required interior side and rear yard setbacks when adjacent to a zone with a height limit of 35' or less. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement for existing design standards. See list in D-1. D-3 (Downtown Warehouse)Amendments • Requiring a minimum setback of 8' and maximum of 16' for residential developments. If the maximum setback is provided, the development must include one of the pedestrian features listed(see the list under the first bullet for D-1). • Building height of 75' by right. • Buildings taller than 75' to a maximum height of 180' are allowed through the Design Review process with one of the following options: o Inclusion of a midblock walkway o Inclusion of the affordable housing incentives o Exceeding the requirements for ground floor use and visual interest o Providing a restrictive covenant for a building older than 50 years and not currently listed as a local landmark site o Providing 500 square feet of open space that is privately owned but publicly accessible • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement for existing design standards. See list in D-1. • Removed the limitation on non-residential uses above the second floor. D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District)Amendments • Introduction of a maximum front yard of 8'. If the maximum front yard is provided, one of the listed pedestrian amenities would be required. • Interior side and rear yard of 10' required when abutting a district with a maximum height of 35' or lower. • Additional height beyond 120' requires one of the identified options listed above. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting existing design standards. See list in D-1. GMU (Gateway Mixed-Use)Amendments • This draft proposes to delete the existing GMU language and replace it with the language provided. The draft eliminates the required Planned Development Application for all new development in the GMU. It also relocates the design standards for the GMU to Chapter 37, so that it is consistent with the rest of the zoning ordinance. • Similarly, to the Downtown Districts, the draft language for the GMU includes midblock walkway standards and allowed encroachments. • Introduction of a maximum front yard setback of 10' for 30% of the building fagade. If the maximum yard is provided, one of the pedestrian amenities would be required. • Increased the height minimum to 75'. Any building over 90' up to 180' is allowed through the Design Review process. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting existing required design standards. The amendments include the following: o Upper floor reflective glass limitation o Dimensions between building entrances o Maximum blank wall limitation o Tree canopy coverage percentage requirements o Minimum vegetation standards o Street trees o Soil volume o Curb cut reduction o Overhead cover o Streetscape landscaping o Horizontal articulation CG (General Commercial) Amendments • Decrease of the required 10' front yard to 5'. • Introduction of a maximum front yard of 10'. If the maximum front yard is provided, one of the pedestrian amenities would be required. See the list under the D-I heading. • Increase of the permitted height to 75' from 60'. Specific boundary for height between 75' and 150' through the Design Review process. The boundaries for this height are for properties between 400 S to 700 S from 300 W to I-15. Outside of the boundaries, 105' is the maximum height allowed through Design Review. • Introduction of outdoor usable space,which provides flexibility for locating the additional required landscaping in the midblock walkway, on the rooftop, plaza or within the required provided yard. • Introducing midblock walkway standards. The dimensional requirements and allowed encroachments are the same as the proposed language for the Downtown districts. • Restricting the location and size of surface parking lots. • Introducing the following design standards to CG within the specified boundary: o Ground floor use o Ground floor use and visual interest o Building materials o Ground floor and upper floor glass requirements o Building entrance locations o Blank wall limitations o Street facing facade limitation o Upper floor stepback FB-UN Districts (FB-UN 1 & FB-UN2)Amendments • These amendments address many of the community concerns with the form-based districts. • Moving the design standards for FB districts to Chapter 21A.37: Design Standards. • Building form regulations include specific open space requirements. • Introducing tree standards to the required open space in the district. • Allowing height encroachments for rooftop uses, such as a garden or outdoor living space with the following requirements: o The rooftop garden includes vegetation that covers 15% of the space on the roof. o Requires a 6' tall wall when abutting an FB-UN1, if the rooftop space is used for a commercial space. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement of existing design standards. The amendments include the following: o Ground floor use o Ground floor use and visual interest o Building materials for both the ground and upper floors o Ground and upper floor glass requirements o Building entrance requirements o Blank wall limitations o Street facing facade length limitations o Upper floor step back required in FBUN2 o Tree canopy coverage percentage requirements o Minimum vegetation standards o Street trees o Soil volume o Curb cut reduction o Overhead cover o Streetscape landscaping o Horizontal articulation o Height transition o Screening of mechanical equipment Design Standards Amendments • Clarifies the authority of the Planning Director when reviewing a modification to a design standard. • New"ground floor use only" definition. • New definition for"amenity space". • Clarifying durable materials requirements. • Limiting the percentage of reflective glass on new developments. • Clarifying the requirement of an upper floor step back. • Introducing tree canopy coverage requirements. • Introducing height transitions between districts with a taller height allowance and districts with a height maximum of 35' or less. • Clarifying the horizontal articulation requirements. Design Review Amendments • Clarification on the applicability of the Design Review standards. • Introduces a small threshold for some Design Review proposals to be administratively approved. • Introducing new requirements for building facades that exceed 200' in length. • Clarification on the roof and cornice design review standard. As anticipated, this project will amend section 21A.44.060 of the recently adopted Off-Street Parking Ordinance. The proposed amendments to this chapter are included in this transmittal. The Planning Commission was briefed on the amendments on June 8, 2022. The Planning Commission provided input and comments to staff. Subsequently, the Planning Commission provided a positive recommendation on the proposed amendments on August 24, 2022. Part of the discussion during the August hearing included comments about the graphics. In response, the consultant adjusted the graphics, which are included in the exhibits of this transmittal. CHANGES TO OFF-STREET PARKING ORDINANCE The recently adopted Off-Street Parking Ordinance will need to be amended as part of this project. This is due to the incorporation of language that limits the size and location of surface parking in the D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, and CG zoning districts. The amended off-street parking ordinance, specifically section 21A.44.060, is included in the ordinance for this transmittal. FB-UN3 INCLUSION The City Council is considering the adoption of the FB-UN3 zone. Due to the potential adoption of this district, staff has added in changes to the Form Based District Chapter and the Design Standards Chapter to make the FB-UN3 zone regulations consistent with the proposed changes to the FB-UN1 and 2 zones. These include changes to open space landscaping requirements that the Council discussed at a work session regarding the FB-UN3 zone. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL Since the positive recommendation from Planning Commission, Planning staff identified potential issues with the proposed Design Standards for the D-1 zoning district. The recommended ordinance includes an upper floor step back requirement of 10' for buildings between 78'-104' and 15' for buildings above 104' in height. Step backs were introduced to additional districts outside of the CSHBD and FB-UN2 zoning districts. The goal of the step back was to encourage additional light and air in higher density districts. Staff doesn't believe that the D-1 (Central Business District) warrants a step back to this degree. Staff recommends that the City Council remove this requirement. Staff identified an error to the CSHBD and the FB-UN design standards. The recommended ordinance required all development in the CSHBD districts to incorporate a 15' step back for buildings above 60' in height. Staff believes that this language is in error and should be reversed to eliminate any amendments to the step backs in the CSHBD districts. All development in the CSHBD districts should incorporate a step back for buildings above 45' in height. For buildings that abut single or two-family districts, a step back shall be incorporated at 30'. Additionally, development above 30' in height in the FB-UN districts required a 15' stepback. This was mistakenly omitted from the draft ordinance. All development above 30' in the FBUN districts should incorporate a 15' stepback. The current ordinance reflects these corrections. Additionally, staff found the proposed ground floor use language limiting to strictly residential buildings in specific zoning districts. The language was also confusing and could be difficult to administer. Staff adjusted the language to address these concerns and the attached ordinance reflects this change. Additional alterations include the removal of the dash(-) in the design standard tables for each zoning district. Staff removed the dash and replaced it with a blank for standards that do not apply to specific districts. This change was made for the ease of future amendments. PUBLIC PROCESS: The consultants, Design Workshop, hosted several stakeholder meetings with community council representatives, members of the development community, business and advocacy representatives, Downtown Alliance, as well as the Disability and Accessibility Commission. The stakeholder groups provided vital direction and feedback on where additional building height could be achieved and tolerated, current experience of the downtown area, as well as known issues within applying the existing development regulations. Additionally, a citywide survey was provided to the broader community, in which 456 individuals responded. Stakeholder Meetings: Held as Zoom meetings and attendees participated via Mentimeter. Chambers of Commerce and Development Community—November 30, 2021 Community Council Representatives—December 1, 2021 Community Representatives, including members of the DAAC—December 2, 2021 Downtown Alliance—January 19, 2022 Public Survey: Published on Planning's website and published via the list serve, Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. The survey was open for 3 weeks and closed on February 24, 2022. Downtown Building Height Website Public Notification: Mailed notification to property owners within the downtown plan area was provided on May 13, 2022. The noticed provided contact information for staff, as well as how to find current drafts of the amendments. Planning Commission Briefing: Planning Commission held a briefing on these amendments on June 8, 2022. PC Briefing Memo Planning Commission Public Hearing: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the text amendments on August 18, 2022. The Planning Commission provided a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendments. Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission (PC) Records: a) PC Agenda for June 8, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes for June 8, 2022 (Click to Access) c) PC Staff Report for June 8, 2022 (Click to Access) d) PC Agenda of August 24, 2022 (Click to Access) e) PC Staff Report of August 24, 2022 (Click to Access Report) f) PC Minutes for August 24, 2022 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Proposed Graphic Changes 5) Public Comment Received after Planning Commission Staff Report was Published SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area) An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 2 1 A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00529. WHEREAS, on August 24, 2022, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall--at the request of the Salt Lake City Council--to amend land use regulations pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area(Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00529); and WHEREAS, at its August 24, 2022 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Section 21A.26.070. That Section 21A.26.070 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Commercial Districts: CG General Commercial District), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.26.070: CG GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the CG General Commercial District is to provide an environment for a variety of commercial uses, some of which involve the outdoor display/storage of merchandise or materials. This district provides economic development I opportunities through a mix of land uses, including retail sales and services, entertainment, office, residential, heavy commercial and low intensities of manufacturing and warehouse uses. This district is appropriate in locations where supported by applicable master plans and along major arterials. Safe, convenient and inviting connections that provide access to businesses from public sidewalks, bike paths and streets are necessary. Access should follow a hierarchy that places the pedestrian first, bicycle second and automobile third. The standards are intended to create a safe and aesthetically pleasing commercial environment for all users. B. Uses: Uses in the CG General Commercial District as specified in Section 21A.33.030, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts", of this title are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.26.010 and this section. C. Minimum Lot Size: 1. Minimum Lot Area: 10,000 square feet. 2. Minimum Lot Width: 60'. 3. Existing Lots: Lots legally existing prior to April 12, 1995, shall be considered legal conforming lots. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard: Five feet. 2. Corner Side Yard: 10'. 3. Interior Side Yard: None required. 4. Rear Yard: 10'. 5. Buffer Yard: All lots abutting residential property shall conform to the buffer yard requirements of Chapter 21A.48 of this title. 6. Accessory Buildings and Structures in Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required yard subject to Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B of this title. E. Maximum Yard: The maximum yard requirement is 10'. 1. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: a. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or b. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or c. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least five feet in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. 2 2. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 3. All provided front or corner side yards must contain a tree every 30'. 4. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15' wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansion, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: a. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or b. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 5. Exceptions to this subsection may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. F. Landscape Yard Requirements: A landscape yard of five feet shall be required on all front or corner side yards, conforming to the requirements of Section 21A.48.090 of this title. G. Maximum Height: No building shall exceed 75' unless the property is within the following boundary: from 400 South to 700 South from 300 West to I-15, where buildings shall not exceed 150'. Additionally, buildings taller than 75' to a maximum of 105' outside of the described boundary may be allowed in accordance with the provisions of Subsections G.1 through G.3 of this section. Illustration of Regulation 21A.26.070.G Maximum Height 3 + :-:In[lulile:emleul[ulnunrn311111dLWui r. 1 No building shall exceed 75' unless it is within the identified boundaries. 2 Buildings that are outside of the identified boundary higher than 75' may be allowed in accordance with the provisions of Subsections G.1 through G.3 of this section. 1. Procedure For Modification: A modification to the height regulations, in this Subsection G may be granted through the design review process in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. In evaluating an application submitted pursuant to this section, the planning commission or in the case of an administrative approval the planning director or designee, shall find that the increased height will result in improved site layout and amenities. 2. Outdoor Usable Space: If additional height is approved, the site shall include outdoor usable space for the building occupants that is equal to at least 10% of the gross floor area of the additional floors. The outdoor usable area may be located within a wider park strip that extends further into the right of way than the current park strip, in midblock walkways that include a public access easement, in rooftop gardens, plazas, or in a provided yard that exceeds the minimum yard requirement. The outdoor usable space shall include a minimum dimension of at least 10' by 10'. 3. Maximum Additional Height for Properties Outside of Boundary Identified in Subsection G: Additional height shall be limited to 30'subject to the provisions in Subsection G.2 for a maximum height of 105'. 4 H. Midblock Walkways: As part of the city's plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to facilitate pedestrian movement within the area. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown area grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. This requirement implements the city's Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies—All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever- These coverings may be between 9' and 14' above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet; (5) Skybridge—A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. Illustration of Regulation 21A.26.070.1-1 Midblock Walkways 5 LE 1 The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. I. Restrictions on Parking Lots and Structures: An excessive amount of at or above ground parking lots and structures can negatively impact the urban design objectives of the General Commercial (CG) District. To control such impacts, the following regulations shall apply to parking facilities that are at or above ground: I. Parking shall be located behind principal buildings or incorporated into the principal building provided the parking is wrapped on street facing facades with a use allowed in the zone other than parking. 2. Parking lots not wholly behind the principal building are limited to no more than two double-loaded parking aisles (bays) adjacent to each other. The length of a parking lot shall not exceed 10 stalls. 3. No special restrictions shall apply to belowground parking facilities. 4. Parking structures shall conform to the requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.37 of this title. 5. All parking lot and structure landscaping must comply with the provisions set forth in Chapter 21A.48 of this title. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.27.020. That Section 21A.27.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Form Based Districts: Building Types and Forms Established), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 6 21A.27.020: BUILDING TYPES AND FORMS ESTABLISHED: A. Building Types and Form Standards: 1. Encourage building forms that are compatible with the neighborhood and the future vision for the neighborhood by acknowledging the current scale of the area and it's architectural and material elements. These elements within new development shall compliment those of the existing buildings; 2. Arrange building heights and scale to provide appropriate transitions between buildings of different scales and adjacent areas, especially between different subdistricts; 3. Guide building orientation through setbacks and other requirements to create a consistent street edge, enhance walkability by addressing the relationship between public and private spaces, and ensure architectural design will contribute to the character of the neighborhood; 4. Use building form, placement, and orientation to identify the private, semiprivate, and public spaces; 5. Minimize the visual impact of parking areas; and 6. Minimize conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. B. Building Types and Forms: 1. Description: The permitted building forms are described in this subsection. Each building form includes a general description and definition, as well as images of what the building form may look like. Building form images are for informational purposes only and not intended to demonstrate exactly what shall be built. The description and images should be used to classify existing and proposed buildings in order to determine what development regulations apply. The drawings are not to scale. They should not be used to dictate a specific architectural style as both traditional and contemporary styles can be used. a. Urban House: A residential structure with the approximate scale of a single dwelling unit, as viewed from the street, but may contain up to two dwelling units. The structure has a single entry facing the street, a front porch or stoop, and a small front yard. Second units may be arranged vertically(up and down) or horizontally(front and back),but the entry to the second unit is from the side, rear, or interior of structure. A third unit may also be located along an alley as a stand alone unit or as a dwelling unit located in an accessory building. All units are on a single lot. 7 ;M1M1Vf :222 Ji } 2 Urban House With Detached Dwelling I''. `' N4acdern And Tradkional Forms 8 ; . ,,+�,,r�t . 4 fit. C • . -.^f.. . Two-Story Contemporary Form b. Two-Family Dwelling: A residential structure that contains two dwelling units in a single building. The units may be arranged side by side,up and down, or front and back. Each unit has its own separate entry directly to the outside. Dwellings may be located on separate lots or grouped on one lot. A third unit may also be located along an alley as a stand alone unit or as a dwelling unit located in an accessory building, but may not be located on a separate lot. t �v Two-Family Dwelling With Garages 9 : \ ■ �// f G� �x -® - \ Traditional Tw FamgyDw O ng Ow dr § � �7 /■\ Modem Two-Family Dwelling c Cottage Development: A unified development th kcontains two or moodetached dwelling units with each unit appearing to 6c a small single-family dwelling with 10 a common green or open space area. Dwellings may be located on separate lots or grouped on one lot. d. Additional Development Standards for Cottage Building Forms: (1) Setbacks Between Individual Cottages: All cottages shall have a minimum setback of eight feet from another cottage. (2) Footprint: No cottage shall have a footprint in excess of 850 square feet. (3) Building Entrance: All building entrances shall face a public street or a common open space area. (4) Open Space Area: A minimum of 250 square feet of common, open space area is required per cottage. At least 50% of the open space area shall be contiguous and include landscaping,walkways or other amenities intended to serve the residents of the development. 11 l • may:- Cottage Development On Single Parcel ± f'L� v •-ti ;n Jl-,I :; ti 'J Cottage Development e. Row House: A series of attached single-family dwellings that share at least one common wall with an adjacent dwelling unit. A row house contains a minimum of three residential dwelling units. Each unit may be on its own lot. If possible, off street parking is accessed from an alley. 12 ,.may c . w Row House On Single Parcel 13 a .r� Modern Roe v HOUSC �orrn Tradi#fonal Rove House Form f. Multi-Family Residential: A multi-family residential structure containing three or more dwelling units that may be arranged in a number of configurations. 14 .� .•N,W.;�. ,:, Uzi.. ?;�s�?Y,.;v+M1+ � %���' ' �a. rye:•. „ . gg Multi-Family Residential Form 15 I ka Multi-Family P-,-j-t r I r, r77 Multi-Family Traditional Fcrm g. Storefront: A commercial structure that may have multiple stories and contain a variety of commercial uses that are allowed in the district that permits this building type. All buildings, regardless of the specific use, have a ground floor that looks like a storefront. 16 � StmefmmFo nin ------. . . ... & V � A« t � C&ntemporary Sbmlmm 17 i 4. k 'i . q Traditional S tore front h. Vertical Mixed Use: A multi-story building that contains a mix of commercial and/or office with residential uses. 18 w Vertical Mid Use Multi-Story Form modem Materia!15 19 . v vM !a• rr Traditional Materials C. Building Form Standards: 1. The provisions of this section shall apply to all properties located within the Form Based Districts as indicated on the maps in each Form Based District. 2. Building form and street type standards apply to all new buildings and additions when the new construction related to the addition is greater than 25% of the footprint of the structure or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less. Refer to Section 21A.27.030 of this chapter on the building configuration standards for more information on how to comply with the standards. The graphics included provide a visual representation of the standards as a guide and are not meant to supersede the standards in the tables. Only building forms identified in the table are permitted. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.27.030. That Section 21A.27.030 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Form Based Districts: Building Configuration and Design Standards), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.27.030: BUILDING CONFIGURATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS: A. Specific Intent of Configuration and Design Standards: 1. Design Related Standards: The design related standards are intended to do the following: 20 a. Implement applicable master plans; b. Continue the existing physical character of residential streets while allowing an increase in building scale along arterials and near transit stations; c. Focus development and future growth in the city along arterials and near transit stations; d. Arrange buildings so they are oriented toward the street in a manner that promotes pedestrian activity, safety, and community; e. Provide human scaled buildings that emphasize design and placement of the main entrance/exit on street facing facades; f. Provide connections to transit through public walkways; g. Provide areas for appropriate land uses that encourage use of public transit and are compatible with the neighborhood; h. Promote pedestrian and bicycle amenities near transit facilities to maximize alternative forms of transportation; and i. Rehabilitate and reuse existing residential structures in the Form Based Zoning Districts when possible to efficiently use infrastructure and natural resources, and preserve neighborhood character. B. Building Entry: Refer to the building entrance standards in Subsection 21 A.37.050.D of this title. 1. Entry Feature: The following building entries are permitted as indicated: TABLE 21A.27.030.B ENTRY FEATURE STANDARDS Entry Feature Urban Cottage Two- Row Multi- Storefront Vertical Permitted Based House Development Family House Family Mixed on Building Dwelling Use Form Type Porch and fence: P P P P P P A planted front yard where the street facing building facade is set back from the front property line with an attached porch that is 21 permitted to encroach into the required yard. The porch shall be a minimum of 6' in depth. The front yard may include a fence no taller than 3' in height Reference Illustration - Porch and Fence Heierer!ce Illustration - Porch And Fence Entry Feature Urban Cottage Two- Row Multi- Storefront Vertical Permitted House Development Family House Family Mixed Based on Dwelling Use Building Form Type Terrace or P P P P P P P lightwell: An entry feature where the street facing facade is set back from the front property line by an elevated 22 terrace or sunken lightwell. May include a canopy or roof Reference Illustration- Terrace or Lightwell Reference Illustration -Terrace Or Lightwell i - I i Entry Feature Urban Cottage Two- Row Multi- Storefront Vertical Permitted Based House Development Family House Family Mixed on Building Dwelling Use Form Type Forecourt: An P P P P P P P entry feature wherein a portion of the street facing facade is close to the property line and the central portion is set back. The court created must be landscaped, contain outdoor plazas, outdoor dining areas, 23 private yards, or other similar features that encourage use and seating Reference Illustration-Forecourt I Entry Feature Urban Cottage Two- Row Multi- Storefront Vertical Permitted Based House Development Family House Family Mixed on Building Form Dwelling Use Type Stoop: An entry P P P P P P P feature wherein the street facing facade is close to the front property line and the first story is elevated from the sidewalk sufficiently to secure privacy for the windows. The entrance contains an exterior stair and landing that is either parallel or 24 perpendicular to the street. Recommended for ground floor residential uses Reference Illustration- Stoop Reference Illustration • Stoop 1ryw.' v Y .lilt . Entry Feature Urban Cottage Two- Row Multi- Storefront Vertical Permitted Based House Development Family House Family Mixed on Building Dwelling Use Form Type Shopfront: An P P P P entry feature where the street facing facade is close to the property line and building entrance is at sidewalk grade. Building entry is covered with an awning, canopy, or is recessed from the front building facade, which defines the entry and 25 provides protection for customers Reference Illustration- Shopfront f{[ fi"on.-r Illn;!r:7h-,n � li:;tr:;nt I ' - i Entry Feature Urban Cottage Two- Row Multi- Storefront Vertical Permitted Based House Development Family House Family Mixed on Building Dwelling Use Form Type Gallery: A P P P building entry where the ground floor is no more than 10' from the front property line and the upper levels or roofline cantilevers from the ground floor facade up to the front property line Reference Illustration- Gallery 26 fi tr ti M 1 S C. Additional Design Standards Required for Form Based Districts: I. Open Space Area: A minimum of 10% of the lot area shall be provided for open space area, unless a different requirement is specified in the building form regulation. Individual districts may require additional open space area requirements. Open space area may include landscaped yards,patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. a. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15' by 15'. b. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. i. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; ii. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; iii. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including,but not limited to, walking paths,playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; iv. Trees with a minimum spread of 20' at mature height to shade a minimum of 33% of the open space area; and/or v. landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 27 UR M I Hu stration Of Building Fenestration 2. Residential Balconies: All street facing residential units above the ground floor or level shall contain a usable balcony facing the street that is a minimum of four feet in depth. Balconies may overhang any required yard. 3. Design Standards Alternatives: a. Alternatives to Required Build-To Line: Where a"required build-to" standard applies, the following alternatives may count toward the minimum build-to requirement as indicated: (1) Landscaping Walls: Landscaping walls between 24" and 42"high may count up to 25% toward the minimum requirement provided the following: (A)The wall incorporates seating areas. (B)The wall is constructed of masonry, concrete, stone or ornamental metal. (C)The wall maintains clear view sightlines where sidewalks and pedestrian connections intersect vehicle drive aisles or streets. (2) Pergolas and Trellises: Pergolas and trellises may count up to 25% toward the minimum build-to requirement provided the following: (A)The structure is at least 48" deep as measured perpendicular to the property line. (B)A vertical clearance of at least eight feet is maintained above the walking path of pedestrians. (C)Vertical supports are constructed of wood, stone, concrete or metal with a minimum of six inches by six inches or a radius of at least four inches. 28 (D)The structure maintains clear view sightlines where sidewalks and pedestrian connections intersect vehicle drive aisles or streets. (3) Arcades: Arcades may count up to 100%toward the minimum requirement provided the following: (A)The arcade extends no more than two stories in height. (B)No portion of the arcade structure encroaches onto public property. (C)The arcade maintains a minimum pedestrian walkway of five feet. (D)The interior wall of the arcade complies with the building configuration standards. (4) Plazas and Outdoor Dining: Plazas and outdoor dining areas may count up to 50% toward the minimum requirement, and have a maximum front setback of up to 15' provided the following: (A)The plaza or outdoor dining is between the property line adjacent to the street and the street facing building facade. (B)Shall be within two feet of grade with the public sidewalk. (C)The building entry shall be clearly visible through the courtyard or plaza. (D)The building facades along the courtyard or plaza shall comply with the ground floor transparency requirement. b. Alternatives to Ground Floor Transparency Requirement: The planning director may modify the ground floor transparency requirement in the following instances: (1) The requirement would negatively impact the historical character of a building within the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; or (2) The requirement conflicts with the structural integrity of the building and the structure would comply with the standard to the extent possible. 4. Permitted Encroachments and Height Exceptions: Obstructions and height exceptions are permitted as listed in this section or in Section 21A.36.020 of this title or as indicated in this subsection. a. Building Height: In order to promote a varied skyline and other roof shapes in the area, structures with a sloped roof may exceed the maximum building height in the form based districts by five feet provided: (1) The additional height does not include additional living space. Vaulted ceilings, storage spaces, and utility spaces are permitted. 29 (2) The slope of the roof is a minimum of a twelve-four pitch or a quarter barrel shape. 12-4 Ratio Minimum Slope Of Pitched Roof kv.. :- in. . .. .. N'e�222b�.'-°.� ::2+b$$$:M1::'.:: v .'. Minimum Slope Of Oueer Barrel Roof b. Roof Top Gardens: Building height encroachments for rooftop uses are permitted to encroach up to 6 feet to accommodate rooftop gardens and/or outdoor living space provided: (1) The rooftop garden includes vegetation that covers a minimum of 15% of the outdoor living space on the roof. The vegetation coverage shall be calculated by utilizing the spread of any trees, shrubs, or ground cover at maturity. (2) If the rooftop is used for non-residential land uses allowed in the zone and located adjacent to the FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District, single-family district, or two-family district, a six foot wall shall be installed along the entire length of the outdoor space facing such zones. 30 5. Pedestrian Connections: Where required, the following pedestrian connection standards apply: a. The connection shall provide direct access from any building entry to the public sidewalk or walkway. b. The connection shall comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA) standards for accessibility. c. The connection shall be fully paved and have a minimum width of four feet(4'). d. The connection shall be separated from vehicle drive approaches and drive lanes by a change in grade and a wheel stop if the walkway is less than eight feet (8') wide. e. Pedestrian connections that lead directly from the sidewalk to the primary building entrance may contain wing walls, no taller than two feet(2') in height for seating, landscaping, etc. D. Other Applicable Development Standards: All uses in the form based districts shall comply with the standards set in Part IV, Regulations of General Applicability, of this title, including the appliable standards in the following chapters: 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses,Buildings, and Structures 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8. 21A.46 Signs 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 10. Any other applicable chapter of this title that may include applicable provisions. E. Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District specific standards for detached or accessory parking garages or structures: 1. Detached or accessory multilevel parking garages or structures shall have the same setback requirements for principal structures. 2. When a required setback abuts a residential district, the minimum setback required shall be a landscape yard to provide a buffer to the abutting residential district.No structure (primary or accessory) shall be permitted within this landscaped buffer. 31 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Subsection 21A.27.050.C. That Subsection 21A.27.050.0 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Form Based Districts: FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District: FB-UN2 Building Form Standards), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: C. FB-UN2 Building Form Standards: Building form standards are listed in Tables 21A.27.050.C.1 through 21A.27.050.C.3 of this section. 1. Cottage Development Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.C.1 MEMENErRegulation for Building Form: e Development H Height 30' maximum. All heights measured from the established grade. F Front and Minimum 10'. Provided front or corner side yard shall provide one tree Corner Side for every 30 linear foot of front or corner side yard property line. The Yard mature tree canopy must cover at least 50% of the required yard area Setback and sidewalk area. S Interior Side Minimum of 6'. Yard R Rear Yard Minimum of 20' between cottage building form and rear property line. SC Separation Minimum of 10', measured from the outside perimeter wall of the between principal structure. Cottages Entry Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See Table E Feature 21A.27.030.B for allowed entry features. Dwelling units adjacent to a street must include an entry feature on the street facing fagade. Pedestrian connections with minimum of 5' width required to each required entry feature. dLW OS Open space At least 25% of the total land area of the cottage development shall be Area maintained as an open space area that complies with the requirements of Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 "Open Space Area." 32 BF Building Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot. Individual lots without forms per street frontage may be created provided each lot has legally established lot access to a public street that includes a minimum 5' wide solid surface walkway. SO Side/Interior Dwelling units not located directly adjacent to a street are permitted, Orientation provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the fagade with the required entry feature. L Lots without Lots for individual cottage units without public street frontage are Street allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: Frontage 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access for pedestrians and vehicles to a public street by way of a minimum 5' wide solid surface walkway, easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s). The requirements for the disclosure of private infrastructure costs shall be the same as required for planned developments per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock As part of the city's plan for the downtown area, it is intended that Walkway midblock walkways be provided to increase pedestrian connectivity and overall livability downtown through the creation of an intricate pedestrian network. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes the need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within this district shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: F. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. G. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. H. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies—All balconies must be located at the third story or above. 33 (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever—These coverings may be between 9 and 14 feet above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of 6' and project no closer to the curb than 3'. (5) Skybridge—A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the 3ra, 4ch, or 5th stories. (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. DS Design See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable Standards building configuration and design standards. 2. Row House Building Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.C.2 34 Building Regulation for Building Form: Regulation Row House H Height Maximum of 40'; All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. The height of the railing/parapet is limited to the height required to meet building code requirements. F Front and Minimum 10' and maximum 15', unless a greater setback is required Corner Side due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback Yard shall be at the edge of the easement. This requirement may be modified Setback through Design Review(Chapter 21A.59). Provided front or corner side yard shall provide one tree for every 30 linear foot of front or corner side yard property line. The mature tree canopy must cover at least 50% of the required yard area and sidewalk area. S Interior Side Minimum of 6' between row house building form and side property Yard line. Minimum of 10' along a side property line when abutting a property in a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 35' or less. No setback is required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20' between row house building form and rear property line, except when rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 35' or less, then the minimum is 25'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates the subject property from another property shall be counted towards the minimum setback. U Uses Per Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. Story Ida Entry Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See Table E Feature 21A.27.030.13 for allowed entry features. Dwelling units adjacent to a street must include an entry feature on street facing facade. Pedestrian connections with minimum 5' width required to each required entry feature. U Upper level When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building Stepback height of 35' or less, the first full floor of the building above 30', measured from finished grade, shall stepback 10' from the building facade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. 35 OS Open space Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is Area equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.27.030.C.I "Open Space Area." A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. Tree canopy at maturity shall count toward the vegetation requirement, BF Building Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the Forms per buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all Lot applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Dwelling units not located directly adjacent to a street are permitted, Orientation provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the fagade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock As part of the city's plan for the downtown area, it is intended that Walkway midblock walkways be provided to facilitate pedestrian movement within the area. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow maximum building heights that exceeds those of other districts in the city, the requirement for the midblock walkway is important to maintain the overall scale and pedestrian nature of the downtown. This requirement implements the city's Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: a. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. The following building encroachments are permitted in a midblock walkway. Under no circumstances shall a midblock walkway be entirely covered. 36 (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever: These coverings may be between nine and fourteen feet above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet; (5) Skybridge: A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. DS Design See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable Standards building configuration and design standards. 3. Multi-family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-use building form standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.C.3 Building Regulation for Building Forms: Regulation Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 50'.1 All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop use is permitted and required railings and walls necessary to comply with building code requirements are permitted to encroach beyond the maximum height up to 5'. GH Ground Minimum ground floor height of 14'. Floor Height F Front and Ground Floor Residential Uses: A minimum of 10' and a maximum of Corner 20'. Ground Floor occupied by retail, restaurants,taverns, brewpubs, bar Side Yard establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities: no Setback minimum is required, provided no doors open into the right of way. A maximum setback of up to 10' is allowed. All other ground floor uses: A minimum of 5' and a maximum 10'. The maximum may be increased due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. 37 This requirement may be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). Provided front or corner side yard shall provide one tree for every 30 linear foot of front or corner side yard property line. The mature tree canopy must cover at least 50% of the required yard area and sidewalk area. S Interior Minimum of 6' required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a Side Yard property in a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 35' or less, then the minimum shall be 15'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall be counted towards the minimum setback. R Rear Yard The rear yard minimum shall be 10', except when rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 30' or less, then the minimum is 20'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates a subject property from a property in a different zoning district shall be counted towards the minimum setback. GU Ground 900 South: The ground floor use space facing 900 South shall be limited Floor Use to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service Requirem establishments, public service portions of businesses,restaurants, ents taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities for a depth of 25'. Amenity space for the occupants of the building shall account for no more than 25% of the length of the ground floor space. E Ground Ground floor dwelling units adjacent to a street must have an allowed Floor entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030.B for allowed entry features. Dwelling Entrances U Upper When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building Level height of 30' or less, the first full floor of the building above 30' shall Stepback stepback 10' from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley M Midblock As part of the city's plan for the downtown area, it is intended that W Walkway midblock walkways be provided to facilitate pedestrian movement within the area. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow 38 maximum building heights that exceeds those of other districts in the city, the requirement for the midblock walkway is important to maintain the overall scale and pedestrian nature of the downtown. This requirement implements the city's Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within this district shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. The following building encroachments are permitted in midblock walkway. Under no circumstances shall a mid block walkway be entirely covered. (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies—All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever- These coverings may be between 9 and 14' above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of 6' and project no closer to the curb than 3'; (5) Skybridge—A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. BF Building Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the Forms Per buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all Lot applicable standards. OS Open As required in Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 "Open Space Area." Space Area 39 DS Design See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building Standards configuration and design standards. Footnotes: 1. Additional Building Height Regulations. Properties listed in this footnote shall have a permitted building height of up to 65' and 5 stories. a. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of West Temple at 800 South or 900 South; b. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of 200 West at 700 South, 800 South or 900 South; c. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of West Temple at Fayette Avenue; d. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of 300 West at 800 South or 900 South; e. On the southeast corner of 1300 South and State Street. f. As indicated on the following map: 40 900 N 67' 47' 152' e F8-UN2 FB-UN2 SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Chapter 21A.30. That Chapter 21A.30 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Downtown Districts), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 21A.30 DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS SECTION: 21A.30.010: General Provisions 21A.30.020: D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030: D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040: D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045: D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District 21A.30.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: 41 A. Statement of Intent: The downtown districts are intended to provide use, bulk,urban design and other controls and regulations appropriate to the commercial core of the city and adjacent areas in order to enhance employment opportunities; to encourage the efficient use of land; to enhance property values; to improve the design quality of downtown areas; to create a unique downtown center which fosters the arts, entertainment, financial, office, retail and governmental activities; to provide safety and security; encourage permitted residential uses within the downtown area; and to help implement adopted plans. B. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title are permitted; provided, that they comply with all requirements of this chapter, the general standards set forth in Part IV of this title, and all other applicable requirements of this title. I. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title,may be allowed in the downtown districts provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in Chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements. C. Impact Controls and General Restrictions in the Downtown Districts: I. Refuse Control: Refuse containers must be covered and shall be stored within completely enclosed buildings or screened in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 21A.48 of this title. For buildings existing as of April 12, 1995, this screening provision shall be required if the floor area or parking requirements are increased by twenty five percent(25%) or more by an expansion to the building or change in the type of land use. 2. Lighting: On site lighting, including parking lot lighting and illuminated signs, shall be located, directed or designed in such a manner so as not to create glare on adjacent properties. D. Outdoor Sales, Display and Storage: "Sales and display(outdoor)" and"storage and display(outdoor)", as defined in Chapter 21A.62 of this title, are allowed where specifically authorized in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title. These uses shall conform to the following: 1. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not encroach into areas of required parking for periods longer than 30 days; 2. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not be located in any required yard area within the lot when the required yard abuts a residential zoning district; 3. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not include the use of banners, pennants or strings of pennants; 42 4. Outdoor storage shall be allowed only where specifically authorized in the applicable district regulation and shall be required to be fully screened with opaque fencing not to exceed eight feet in height; and 5. Outdoor sales and display and outdoor storage shall also be permitted when part of an authorized temporary use as established in Chapter 21A.42 of this title. E. Restrictions on Parking Lots and Structures: An excessive amount of at or above ground parking lots and structures can negatively impact the urban design objectives of the Downtown Zoning Districts. To control such impacts, the following regulations apply to surface parking and above grade structures: I. Parking shall be located behind principal buildings or incorporated into the principal building provided the parking is wrapped on street facing facades with a use allowed in the zone other than parking. 2. A parking lot shall not consist of more than two double-loaded parking aisles (bays) adjacent to each other. The length of a parking lot shall not exceed 10 stalls. Parking for government facilities necessary for public health and safety are exempt from this provision. Illustration of Regulation 21A.010.E.2 Surface Parking Lots Ong 9A9 8 Bass _. on r ` - r' r r' ff 3. Parking lots, garages or parking structures,proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street and that would result in a building demolition are prohibited in the Downtown zoning districts. 4. No special restrictions shall apply to belowground parking facilities. 43 F. Midblock Walkways: As part of the city's plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to increase pedestrian connectivity and overall livability downtown through the creation of an intricate pedestrian network. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above. (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever- These coverings may be between 9 and 14' above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet. (5) Skybridge: A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories. (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. Illustration of Regulation 21A.30.010.F Midblock Walkways 44 WiJtr. ]1� , LE 1 The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. G. Sidewalks: For all downtown districts, sidewalks must be a clear walking path that is a minimum of 10' wide. Outdoor dining shall be permitted within the sidewalk if it complies with the minimum width of a clear path as defined in the outdoor dining design guidelines. H. Additional Standards: All uses in the downtown districts shall comply with the standards set in Part IV, Regulations of General Applicability, of this title, including the applicable standards in the following chapters: 1. 21A.36 General Provisions 2. 21A.37 Design Standards 3. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 4. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 5. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 6. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 7. 21A.46 Signs 8. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 9. Any other applicable chapter of this title that may include applicable provisions. 21A.30.020: D-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-1 Central Business District is to provide for commercial and economic development within Salt Lake City's most urban and intense areas. A broad range of uses, including very high density housing, are intended to foster a 45 24 hour activity environment consistent with the area's function as the business, office, retail, entertainment, cultural and tourist center of the region. Development is intended to be very intense with high lot coverage and large buildings that are placed close together while being oriented toward the pedestrian with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape and preserving the urban nature of the downtown area. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to achieve established objectives for urban design, pedestrian amenities and land use control. B. Uses: Uses in the D-1 Central Business District as specified in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.30.010 of this chapter. C. D-1 Central Business District General Regulations: The regulations established in this section apply to the D-1 Central Business District as a whole 1. Yard Requirements: No minimum yards are required. A maximum yard of eight feet is allowed. a. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: i. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or ii. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or iii. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least five feet in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15' wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: i. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or ii. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 46 d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. e. Interior Side Yards: No minimum interior side yard is required. f. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required. 4. Landscape Requirements for Demolition Sites: Vacant lots,resulting from demolition activities where no replacement use is proposed, shall conform to Chapter 21A.48 of this title, special landscape requirements applicable to the D-1 Central Business District. D. Height Regulations: Buildings in the D-1 zoning district shall comply with the following provisions: 1. Building Heights: No building shall be less than 100'. There is no maximum building height, subject to standards contained in Subsections 21A.30.020.D.2 through D.3. 2. Exceptions to the minimum height requirements are as follows: a. Utility Buildings necessary to provide electricity,water, sewer, storm water, and other necessary utility services to the downtown area. b. Accessory building and structures, including accessory buildings that serve public transportation, downtown improvement districts, and other public maintenance buildings. c. Buildings on lots or parcels that are less than 5,000 square feet in size. d. Buildings with a footprint of less than 2,500 square feet. e. Building approved through the design review process in Chapter 21A.59. 2. Buildings in excess of 100', are allowed subject to the following standard: a. A minimum stepback of five feet or other architectural feature that can deflect snow and ice from falling directly onto a sidewalk, midblock walkway, or other public space. The stepback may be located above the height of the first floor and below 150' in height above the sidewalk or public space. Buildings that are not clad in glass are exempt from this requirement. 3. Buildings in excess of 200' with no limit and subject to Chapter 21A.59, Design Review, shall include at least one of the following five options: a. Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the midblock walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions of Subsection 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet. This option allows for additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway requirements; or 47 b. The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified in Chapter 21A.52 of this title; or c. The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum requirement for ground floor uses identified in chapter 21A.37 (Design Standards) of this title, specifically: (1) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to 100%. This option requires that the entire ground floor use of a building consists of retail good establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants,public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters,performing art facilities or similar uses that encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement; or (2) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased to 85% and the visual interest requirement must be increased to 15%. This option requires an increased percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased percentage of the building to provide visual interest; d. The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a building that is 50 years or older, or a building that is a nationally recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum of 50 years. e. The proposal includes a privately owned,publicly accessible open space on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of the property. The space shall be a minimum of 500 square feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at least 60% of the open space area. This option allows for additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. E. Special Controls Over the Main Street Retail Core: 1. Intent: Special controls shall apply to land located within the Main Street retail core area to preserve and enhance the viability of retail uses within the downtown area. The regulations of this subsection shall be in addition to the requirements of Subsections C and D of this section. 2. Area of Applicability: The controls established in this subsection shall apply to property developed or redeveloped after April 12, 1995, when located along any block face on the following streets: a. Main Street located within the D-I District; 48 b. 100 South Street between West Temple Street and State Street; c. 200 South Street between West Temple Street and State Street; and d. 300 South Street between West Temple Street and State Street. 3. First Floor Retail Required: The first floor space of all buildings within this area shall be required to provide uses consisting of retail goods establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters or performing arts facilities. 4. Restrictions on Driveways: Driveways shall not be permitted along Main Street,but shall be permitted along other streets within the Main Street retail core area, provided they are located at least 80' from the intersection of two street right of way lines. 21A.30.030: D-2 DOWNTOWN SUPPORT DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-2 Downtown Support District is to provide an area that fosters the development of a sustainable urban neighborhood that accommodates commercial, office, residential and other uses that relate to and support the Central Business District. Development within the D-2 Downtown Support District is intended to be less intensive than that of the Central Business District, with high lot coverage and buildings placed close to the sidewalk. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. Design standards are intended to promote pedestrian oriented development with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape. B. Uses: Uses in the D-2 Downtown Support District, as specified in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.30.010 of this chapter and this section. C. Lot Size Requirements: No minimum lot area or lot width shall be required. D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum permitted building height shall not exceed 120' subject to the following review process: Buildings over 65' in height are subject to design review according to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. E. Yard Requirements: I. Front and Corner Side Yard: There is no minimum setback. The maximum setback is 10 feet. Buildings that contain ground floor residential uses shall have a front yard setback of a minimum of 8' and a maximum setback no greater than 16'. A provided yard for any use shall be considered a landscaped yard and subject to the provisions of Chapter 21A.48 for required landscaped yards. a. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: 49 i. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or ii. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or iii. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5' in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director,may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15' wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: i. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or ii. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 2. Interior Side Yards: No Minimum side yard is required except a minimum of 10' is required when the side yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35' or less. 3. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required except a minimum of 10' is required when the rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35' or less. 4. Buffer Yards: Any lot abutting a lot in a residential district shall conform to the buffer yard requirements of Chapter 21A.48 of this title or the above standards, whichever is greater. F. Existing Vehicle Sales or Lease Lots: 1. Vehicle Display Area: The parking provided in the vehicle display area will not be counted as off street parking when computing maximum parking requirements and is not considered to be a surface parking lot when determining required setbacks in this section. 2. Design Standards: Structures associated with accessory uses such as,but not limited to, repair shops or vehicle washing do not need to meet required design standards and 50 may exceed the maximum front and corner side yard setbacks. These structures are required to have one of the following elements listed below: a. Durable materials, as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.B; or b. Landscaping. Primary structures that contain sales floors and auto display areas must meet all design standards and setbacks. 3. Landscaping: A landscaped yard of at least 10' in depth is required along any portion of the street frontage of the property that is not occupied by a permanent structure. All other landscaping requirements in Chapter 21A.48 remain applicable. 4. Multiple Buildings: Vehicle sales or lease lots may have multiple buildings on a parcel subject to all buildings being associated with the use of the lot as vehicles sales or lease. 21A.30.040: D-3 DOWNTOWN WAREHOUSE/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District is to provide for the reuse of existing warehouse buildings for multi-family and mixed use while also allowing for continued retail, office and warehouse uses within the district. The reuse of existing buildings and the construction of new buildings are to be done as multi-family residential or mixed use developments containing retail or office uses on the lower floors and residential on the upper floors. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to create a unique and sustainable downtown neighborhood with a strong emphasis on urban design, adaptive reuse of existing buildings, alternative forms of transportation and pedestrian orientation. B. Uses: Uses in the D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District as specified in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the provisions of this chapter and other applicable provisions of this title. C. Lot Size Requirements: No minimum lot area or lot width shall be required. D. Yard Requirements: There are no minimum setbacks, except for buildings that contain ground floor residential uses in which case the front yard setback shall be a minimum of 8' and no greater than 16'. A provided front yard for any use shall be considered a landscaped yard and subject to the provision of Chapter 21A.48 for required landscaped yards. The maximum front yard setback shall be eight feet for all other uses. 51 1. The yard must be designed with usability as a consideration. Development that implements the maximum yard is required to have at least one of the following elements: a. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or b. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or c. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5' in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. 2. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 3. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15' wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: a. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or b. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 4. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. E. Maximum Building Height: Buildings in the D3 zoning district shall comply with the following provisions: 1. The permitted building height shall not exceed 75'. 2. Buildings taller than 75' but less than 180' may be allowed subject to the following provisions: a. Approval is subject to Chapter 21A.59 Design Review: (1) Provided the additional height is supported by the applicable master plan. (2) The building includes at least one of the following five options: (A)Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the midblock walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions of Subsection 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet. This option allows for additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway requirements; 52 (B)The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified in Chapter 21A.52 of this title; (C)The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum requirement for ground floor uses identified in Chapter 21A.37 (Design Standards) of this title, specifically: (i) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to 100%. This option requires that the entire ground floor use of a building consists of retail good establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters,performing art facilities or similar uses that encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement; or (ii) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased to 75% and the visual interest requirement must be increased to 25%. This option requires for an increased percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased percentage of the building to provide visual interest; (D)The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a building that is 50 years or older, or a building that is a nationally recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum of 50 years; or (E)The proposal includes a privately owned,publicly accessible open space on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of the property. The space shall be a minimum of 500 square feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at least 60% of the open space area. This option allows for additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. 21A.30.045: D-4 DOWNTOWN SECONDARY CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-4 Secondary Central Business District is to foster an environment consistent with the area's function as a housing, entertainment, cultural, convention,business, and retail section of the city that supports the Central Business District. Development is intended to support the regional venues in the district, 53 such as the Salt Palace Convention Center, and to be less intense than in the Central Business District. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to achieve established objectives for urban and historic design, pedestrian amenities, and land use control, particularly in relation to retail commercial uses. B. Uses: Uses in the D-4 Secondary Central Business District as specified in Section 21A.33.050, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.30.010 of this chapter. In addition, all conditional uses in the D-4 District shall be subject to design evaluation and approval by the planning commission. C. Minimum Lot Size: No minimum lot area or lot width is required. D. Yard Requirements: 1. Front and Corner Side Yards: No minimum yards are required, however, a maximum front yard setback of eight feet is allowed. a. The yard must be designed with the usability as a consideration. Development that implements the maximum yard is required to have at least one of the following elements: i. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; ii. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or iii. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5' in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15' wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: i. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or ii. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 54 d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 2. Interior Side Yards: No minimum side yard is required except a minimum of 10' is required when the side yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35' or less. 3. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required except a minimum of 10' is required when the rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35' or less. E. Building Height: Buildings in the D-4 zoning district shall comply with the following provisions: 1. The permitted building height shall not exceed 75'. 2. Buildings taller than 75' and up to 120'may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. a. Additional Height: Additional height may be authorized up to 120' if the street facing facades contain ground floor commercial uses other than parking for at least 75% of the street facing facades according to Chapter 21A.37 and subject to approval through the design review process in Chapter 21A.59. b. Additional Permitted Height Location: Additional height greater than 120' but not more than 375' in height is permitted in the area bounded by: (1) The centerlines of South Temple, West Temple, 200 South, and 200 West Streets; and (2) Beginning at the Southeast Corner of Block 67, Plat `A', Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence along the south line of said Block 67, N89054'02"W 283.86 feet; thence N00004'50"E 38.59 feet; thence N10046'51"W 238.70 feet; thence N24045'15"W 62.98 feet; thence S89054'02"E 355.45 feet to the east line of said Block 67; thence along said east line S00006'35"W 330.14 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 102,339 square feet, or 2.349 acres, more or less. 55 SOUTH TEMPLE t. � s f � l t00 SOUTH i ;ir y Z. 11 K l 1R>• 1 1 �'. �" Y _ N N rr odd pppp� , �Wg 200 SOUTH 3. Buildings in excess of 120' up to 375' may be authorized subject to the following provisions: a. Approval is subject to Chapter 21A.59 Design Review; b. Shall include a minimum stepback of five feet or other architectural feature that can deflect snow and ice from falling directly onto a sidewalk, midblock walkway, or other public space. The stepback may be located above the height of the first floor and below 120' in height above the sidewalk or public space. Buildings that are clad in glass that totals less than 50% of the total wall surface area are exempt from this requirement; c. The additional height is supported by the applicable master plan; and d. The building includes at least one of the following five options: 1. Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the midblock walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions of Section 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet. This option allows for additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway requirements; 2. The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified in chapter 21A.52 of this title; 3. The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum requirement for ground floor uses identified in Chapter 21A.37 (Design Standards) of this title, specifically: (1) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to 100%. This option 56 requires that the-entire ground floor use of a building consists of retail good establishments,retail service establishments or restaurants,public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters, performing art facilities or similar uses that encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement.; or (2) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased to 75% and the visual interest requirement must be increased to 25%. This option requires for an increased percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased percentage of the building to provide visual interest; (D)The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a building that is 50 years or older, or a building that is a nationally recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum of 50 years. (E)The proposal includes a privately owned,publicly accessible open space on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of the property. The space shall be a minimum of 500 square feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at least 60% of the open space area. This option allows for additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. e. Exception: The first 50' of height shall not be set back from the street front more than five feet except that setbacks greater than five feet may be approved through the design review process or, has otherwise allowed by this code. SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Chapter 21A.31. That Chapter 21A.30 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Gateway Districts), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 21A.31 GATEWAY DISTRICTS SECTION: 21A.31.010: General Provisions 21A.31.020: G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District 57 21A.31.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Statement of Intent: The G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District is intended to provide an urban setting for residential and commercial, developments, and implement the objectives of the Downtown Plan through district regulations that reinforce the mixed use character of the area and encourage the development of urban neighborhoods containing supportive retail, service commercial, office, and high density residential. B. Uses: Uses in the G-MU Gateway-Mixed District as specified in Section 21A.33.060, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District", of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in this section. C. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses, in Section 21A.33.060, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District", of this title are permitted; provided, that they comply with all requirements of this chapter, the general standards set forth in Part IV of this title, and all other applicable requirements of this title. D. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in Section 21A.33.060, "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District", of this title, shall be permitted in the G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in Chapter 21A.54 of this title. E. Midblock Walkways: As part of the city's plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to increase pedestrian connectivity and overall livability downtown through the creation of an intricate pedestrian network. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. This requirement implements the city's Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. 58 b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever- These coverings may be between 9 and 14' above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet; (5) Skybridge: A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. Illustration of Regulation 21A.31.010.E2 Midblock Walkways 77 i , r i Syr' too r �a.. 1 The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. F. Modifications of Standards: A modification to the provisions of this chapter may be granted through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 59 G. Midblock Street Development: Developments constructing midblock streets, either privately owned with a public easement or publicly dedicated, that are desired by an applicable master plan: I. May transfer a portion or all of the above ground development square footage of the proposed new midblock street to other land within the proposed development. 2. May increase the height of the building on the remaining land within the development site to a height necessary to accommodate the development square footage of the proposed right of way that is being transferred. 3. Any proposal under this section shall be subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. H. Parking: 1. Belowground Parking Facilities: No special design and setback restrictions shall apply to belowground parking facilities. 2. Landscape Requirements: Surface parking lots shall have a landscaped setback of at least 20' and meet interior landscaped requirements as outlined in Chapter 21A.48 of this title. 3. Design Review Approval: A modification to the restrictions on parking lots and structures provisions of this section may be granted through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. Such conditional uses shall also be subject to urban design evaluation. 4. Parking structures shall conform to the requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.37 of this title. I. Outdoor Sales, Display and Storage: "Sales and display(outdoor)" and"storage and display(outdoor)", is permitted for retail uses and the retail components of other permitted and conditional uses authorized in Section 21A.33.060 "Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District. These uses shall conform to the following: I. Outdoor sales and display and outdoor storage may also be permitted when part of an authorized temporary use as established in Chapter 21A.42 of this title; 2. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not encroach into areas of required parking for longer than 30 days; 3. The outdoor permanent sales or display of merchandise shall not be located in any required yard area within the lot when the lot abuts a residential zoning district; 4. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not include the use of banners, pennants or strings of pennants. 60 21 A.31.020: G-MU GATEWAY-MIXED USE DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District is intended to implement the objectives of the adopted Downtown Plan and encourage the mixture of residential, commercial and assembly uses within an urban neighborhood atmosphere. The 200 South corridor is intended to encourage commercial development on an urban scale and the 500 West corridor is intended to be a primary residential corridor from North Temple to 400 South. Development in this district is intended to create an urban neighborhood that provides employment and economic development opportunities that are oriented toward the pedestrian with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape. The standards are intended to achieve established objectives for urban and historic design,pedestrian amenities and land use regulation. B. Special Provisions: 1. Commercial Uses, 200 South: All buildings fronting 200 South shall have commercial uses that may include retail goods/service establishments, offices, restaurants, art galleries, motion picture theaters or performing arts facilities shall be provided on the first floor adjacent to the front or corner side lot line. The facades of such first floor shall be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. 2. Residential Units, 500 West: Buildings fronting on 500 West shall be required to have residential units occupying a minimum of 50% of the structure's gross square footage. C. Building Height: The minimum building height shall be 75' The maximum building height shall not exceed 180'. 1. Design Review: A modification to building height over ninety feet(90) in height shall only be allowed if approved through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59 of this title, and subject to compliance to the applicable master plan. D. All buildings shall be designed with a base that is differentiated from the remainder of the building. The base shall be between one and three stories in height,be visible from pedestrian view, and appropriately scaled to the surrounding contiguous historic buildings. The base shall include fenestration that distinguishes the lower from upper floors. Insets and/or projections are encouraged. The ground floor of all new buildings shall have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 16'. E. Yard Requirements: No minimum setback requirements. A maximum setback of 10' is allowed for up to 30% of the building facade. 61 1. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: a. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or b. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or c. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5' in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. 2. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 3. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director,may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15' wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansion, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: a. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or b. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 4. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 5. Ground floor residential uses shall have a minimum setback of 10'. This setback shall be incorporated into a private yard for the ground floor units. SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: Legend: C= Conditional P= Permitted Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District D-1 I D-2 D-3 D-4 62 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated P P P P elsewhere in this title Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 Alcohol: Bar establishment(indoor) P6 C6 C P6 Bar establishment outdoor P6 0 C6 P6 Brewpub (indoor) P6 P6 P6 P6 Brewpub (outdoor) P6 P6 P6 P6 Tavern (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6 Tavern (outdoor) P6 C C P6 Animal, veterinary office P P Antenna, communication tower P P P P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building C C C C height Art gallery P P P P Artisan food production P14,18 PIS PIS PIS Bed and breakfast P P P P Bed and breakfast inn P P P P Bed and breakfast manor P P P P Bio-medical facility P17•18 P17''g P17''g P17,18 Blood donation center P Bus line station/terminal P7 P7 P7 P7 Bus line yard and repair facility P Car wash P3 Check cashing/payday loan P5 business Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P Commercial food preparation Pig P18 P18 P18 Community garden P P P P Convention center P Crematorium P P P Daycare center, adult P P P P Daycare center, child P P P P Daycare, nonregistered home P 12 P 12 P 12 P 12 daycare 63 Daycare,registered home daycare p12 P12 P12 P12 or preschool Dwelling: Artists' loft/studio P P P P Assisted living facility (large) P P P P Assisted living facility (limited P P P capacity) Assisted living facility (small) P P P P Congregate care facility(large) C C C C Congregate care facility(small) P P P P Group home (large) C C Group home (small) P P P P Multi-family P P P P Residential support (large) C C Residential support (small) C C Exhibition hall P Farmers' market P Financial institution P P P P Financial institution with drive- Px P8 through facility Funeral home P P P Gas station P P7 P7 Government facility C C C C Government facility requiring P7 P7 special design features for security purposes Heliport, accessory C C C Home occupation P13 P13 P13 P13 Homeless resource center Cls Cls Homeless shelter C l s C l s Hotel/motel P P P P Industrial assembly C1S C18 Laboratory, medical related Pis P 18 P 18 P 1 s Laundry, commercial P18 Library P P P P Limousine service P Mixed use development P P P P 64 Mobile food business (operation in P P P P the public right of way) Mobile food business (operation on P P P P private property) Mobile food court P P P P Municipal services uses including Ecity utility uses and police and P P P P fire stations Museum P P P P Office P P P P Office,publishing company P P P P Open space on lots less than 4 P7 P7 P7 P7 acres in size Park P P P P Parking, commercial C19 P19 C19 C19 Parking, off site P19 P19 P19 P19 Performing arts production facility P P P P Place of worship P11 P11 P11 P11 Radio, television station P P P Railroad, passenger station P P P P Reception center P P P P Recreation (indoor) P P P P Recreation (outdoor) P Research and development facility P" P18 P18 P18 Restaurant P P P P Restaurant with drive-through PS facility Retail goods establishment P P P P Retail service establishment P P P P Retail service establishment, P P upholstery shop Sales and display(outdoor) P P P P School: College or university P P P P K- 12 private P P K- 12 public P P Music conservatory P P P P Professional and vocational P P P P Seminary and religious institute P P P P 65 Small brewery CIS Social service mission and charity C C dining hall Stadium C C C Storage, self P16 P P Store: Department P P P Fashion oriented department P2 Mass merchandising P P P Pawnshop P Specialty P P P Superstore and hypermarket P Studio, art P P P P Technology facility P18 P18 pls P18 Theater, live performance P9 P9 P`' P9 Theater, movie P P P P Utility,buildings or structure PI P' P' P1 Utility, transmission wire, line, P1 P1 P1 P1 pipe or pole Vehicle: Automobile repair(major) P P7 P7 Automobile repair(minor) P P7 P7 Automobile sales/rental and P i o p P 10 service Vending cart,private property P P P P Vending cart,public property Warehouse PPS Warehouse, accessory P P Wholesale distribution PPS Wireless telecommunications facility(see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. Uses allowed only within the boundaries and subject to the provisions of the Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District(Section 21A.34.110 of this title). 66 3. A car wash located within 165 feet(including streets) of a residential use shall not be allowed. 4. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review (Chapter 21A.59 of this title). 5. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 6. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 7. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 2 IA.59, "Design Review", of this title. 8. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 9. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district. 10. Must be located in a fully enclosed building and entirely indoors. 11. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern,bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 12. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 13. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 14. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350 of this title. 16. Limited to basement/below ground levels only. Not allowed on the ground or upper levels of the building, with the exception of associated public leasing/office space. 17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 18. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 19. Parking lots, garages or parking structures,proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.020. That Section 21A.37.020 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Design Standards: Applicability), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.020: APPLICABILITY: 67 The design standards identified in this chapter apply to all properties in the zoning districts listed in Section 21A.37.060 of this chapter pursuant to the following: A. Change in Use: A change in use shall be exempt from this chapter, provided that it does not result in alterations of existing design elements regulated by the standards of this chapter. B. Additions: When an addition to an existing structure is made, only the addition is subject to this chapter,provided that no existing design element regulated by these standards is altered in other portions of the existing structure. C. Repair, Maintenance or Alterations: Structures may be repaired, maintained or altered, except that no such work shall create a noncompliance or increase the degree of an existing noncompliance. If a design element of an existing structure complies with this chapter, the design element shall not be altered such that the structure becomes noncompliant. D. Certificate of Appropriateness: All new construction, additions, exterior building work, structure work, and site work on property in an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or a landmark site remains subject to a certificate of appropriateness as required in Subsection 21A.34.020.E of this title. SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.040. That Section 21A.37.040 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Design Standards: Modifications of Design Standards), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.040: MODIFICATIONS OF DESIGN STANDARDS: The planning director and/or planning commission may modify any of the design standards identified in this chapter subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. The applicant must demonstrate that the modification meets the intent for the specific design standards requested to be modified, the standards for design review and any adopted design guidelines that may apply. A. The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 2 IA.59.040, Table 2 IA.59.040 or when authorized in the specific zoning district. 68 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, and the project is compliant with the applicable design standards (Sections 21A.37.050 and 21A.37.060). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to: a. Comply with the purpose of the base zoning district; b. Comply with the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning; c. Achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street; d. Achieve the applicable design review objectives; or e. Encourage the reuse of existing buildings when a modification to a noncomplying building results in the building becoming closer to complying with a specific design standard. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. B. For properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay District, the historic landmark commission may modify any of the design standards in this chapter as part of the review of the standards in Section 21A.34.020 of this title. SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.050. That Section 21A.37.050 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Design Standards: Design Standards Defined), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.050: DESIGN STANDARDS DEFINED: 69 The design standards in this chapter are defined as follows. Each design standard includes a specific definition of the standard and may include a graphic that is intended to help further explain the standard; however, in cases where a conflict exists between the definition and the graphic,the definition shall take precedence. The table that follows (Section 21A.37.060) highlights the connection between each design standard and the zoning districts. It identifies whether a standard is required or not. Standards that are required are identified by an X or a number referencing the applicable standard. If there is a specific detail for the standard, it will also be identified in the table. A. Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: This standard's purpose is to increase the amount of active uses and/or visual interest on the ground floor of a building. Active uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent to a building, and encourage walk-in traffic. There are two options for achieving this, one dealing solely with the amount of ground floor use, and the other combining a lesser amount of ground floor use with increased visual interest in the building facade's design. The majority of the ground level facade of a building shall be placed parallel, and not at an angle, to the street. 1. Ground Floor Use Only: This option requires that a portion of the length of any street-facing building facade on the ground floor of a new principal building include a permitted use, conditional use, or an amenity space within a residential building that is only available for the residents of the building. The ground floor of all new buildings shall have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 16' and shall promote an active pedestrian environment through inclusion of active uses that capture the attention of a passer-by. Active uses include retail establishments, retail services, civic spaces (theaters, museums, etc), restaurants,bars, art and craft studios, and other uses determined to be substantially similar by the planning director and/or planning commission. For buildings that are entirely residential, active uses may include ground floor residential units. The ground floor use shall not consist of spaces that discourage walk-in traffic, such as a residential mailroom, common room, back of house functions, or private business offices associated with an active use. Allowed uses shall occupy a minimum percentage of the length of the street facing facade according to Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. All portions of such ground floor spaces shall extend a minimum of 25' into the building. Parking may be located behind these spaces. a. For single-family attached uses, the required use depth may be reduced to ten feet (10'). b. The TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-UN3 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban 70 Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height. c. For single-family or two-family uses, garages occupying up to 50% of the length of the ground floor building facade are exempt from this requirement. d. For all other uses, vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement. Such accessways shall not exceed 30' in width. Individual dwelling unit garages do not qualify for this exemption. e. Amenity space is defined as a portion of the public right of way adjacent to the sidewalk, outside of the pedestrian walking area,which can include streetscape elements, street furniture, landscaping, outdoor dining areas, and/or trees. It shall only be counted for up to 25% of the length of the building facade. For corner properties, each street facing building facade shall be allowed to have up to 25% of the required ground floor to include amenity space. This is applicable in districts where there are no front or side yard setback requirements. Amenity spaces are subject to any necessary encroachment agreements that may be required. f. Areas such as kitchens, storage, bicycle parking, and other areas that are not accessible to customers shall not be counted towards the requirement for ground floor use and visual interest. 2. Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: This option allows for some flexibility in the amount of required ground floor use,but in return requires additional design requirements for the purpose of creating increased visual interest and pedestrian activity where the lower levels of buildings face streets or sidewalks. This option identifies a required percentage of ground floor space that must be an active use, and the percentage of the building which must provide visual interest. An applicant utilizing this option must proceed through the design review process, Chapter 21A.59), for review of the project for determination of the project's compliance with those standards, and in addition, whether the design contributes to increased visual interest through a combination of increased building material variety, architectural features, facade changes, art, and colors; and, increased pedestrian activity through permeability between the building and the adjacent public realm using niches, bays, gateways,porches, colonnades, stairs or other similar features to facilitate pedestrian interaction with the building. 71 Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.A.2 Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest MOO °EOM r 1 Contribute to increased visual interest through a combination of increased building material variety, architectural features, facade changes, art, and colors. 2 Contribute to increased pedestrian activity through a clear visual relationship between the building and the adjacent public realm using niches, bays, gateways,porches, colonnades, stairs or other similar features. B. Building Materials: I. All buildings which have been altered over 75% on the exterior facade shall comply with the material requirements detailed below. Buildings older than 50 years are exempt from this requirement if alterations are consistent with the existing architecture. 2. For the purpose of the requirements below, a durable material is defined as any material that has a manufacturer's warranty of a minimum of 20 years or is a natural material such as stone or wood provided the wood is treated and maintained for exterior use. 3. Ground Floor Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, a minimum amount of the ground floor facade's wall area of any street facing facade shall be clad in durable materials according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Durable materials include stone, brick, masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials may be used for the remainder of the ground floor facade adjacent to a street. Other materials proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is appropriate for the ground floor of a structure. 72 4. Upper Floor Building Materials: Floors above the ground floor level shall include durable materials on a minimum amount of any street facing building facade of those additional floors according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Windows and doors are not included in that minimum amount. Durable materials include stone,brick,masonry, textured or patterned concrete, and fiber cement board or other material that includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading,weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. C. Glass: 1. Ground Floor Glass: The ground floor building elevation of all new buildings facing a street, and all new ground floor additions facing a street, shall have a minimum percentage of glass, as calculated-between three feet and eight feet above grade according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. All ground floor glass shall allow unhampered and unobstructed visibility into the building for a depth of at least five feet, excluding any glass etching and window signs when installed and permitted in accordance with Chapter 21A.46, "Signs", of this title. The planning director may approve a modification to ground floor glass requirements if the planning director finds: a. The requirement would negatively affect the historic character of an existing building; b. The requirement would negatively affect the structural stability of an existing building; or c. The ground level of the building is occupied by residential uses that face the street, in which case the specified minimum glass requirement may be reduced by 15%. 73 Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.C.I Ground Floor Glass (References the measurements in Table D, D-1) Y to 8' above grade 1 The ground floor building elevation of all new buildings facing a street, and all new ground floor additions facing a street, shall have a minimum percentage of glass as indicated in the associated tables in this chapter,between three feet and eight feet above grade. 2. Upper Floor Glass: Above the first floor of any multi-story building, the surface area of the facade of each floor facing a street must contain a minimum percentage of glass according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. a. Reflective Glass: The maximum percentage of reflective glass, defined as glass with a coating that creates a mirror-like appearance, is allowed according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter, on both the ground floor and upper floor of buildings. D. Building Entrances: A building entrance is defined as an entrance to a building that includes a door and entry feature such as a recess or canopy that provides customers with direct access to the use. For the purpose of this provision, an operable building entrance shall be open and accessible during the hours that the business is open and comply with applicable ADA standards. At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is required for every street facing facade. Additional operable building entrances shall be required, at a minimum, at each specified length of street facing building facade according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. The center of each additional entrance shall be located within six feet either direction of the specified location. Each ground floor nonresidential leasable space facing a street shall have an 74 operable entrance facing that street and a walkway to the nearest sidewalk. Corner entrances, when facing a street and located at approximately a 45' angle to the two adjacent building facades (chamfered corner), may count as an entrance for both of the adjacent facades. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.D Building Entrances (References the measurements in Table D, D-1) lip � I e.ddft F4%0&,.rb 1 At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is required for every street facing facade. Additional operable building entrances shall be required, at a minimum distance as indicated in the associated tables in this chapter. E. Maximum Length of Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall uninterrupted by windows, doors, art or architectural detailing at the ground floor level along any street facing facade shall be as specified according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Changes in plane, texture, materials, scale of materials,patterns, art, or other architectural detailing are acceptable methods to create variety and scale. This shall include architectural features such as bay windows,recessed or projected entrances, windows, balconies, cornices, columns, or other similar architectural features. The architectural feature shall be either recessed a minimum of 12" or projected a minimum of 12". 75 Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.E Maximum Length of Blank Wall(References the measurements in Table D, Downtown Districts) C 1 The maximum length of any blank wall uninterrupted by windows, doors, art or architectural detailing at the ground floor level along any street facing fagade shall be limited to the specified measurement indicated in the associated table in this chapter. 2 The architectural feature shall be either recessed a minimum of 12" or projected a minimum of 12". F. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: This requirement sets the maximum length of a single street facing fagade of a structure. The purpose of this is to have building massing that better responds to human scale to create a walkable pedestrian environment. No street facing building wall may be longer than specified along a street line according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. A minimum of 20' is required between separate buildings when multiple buildings are placed on a single parcel according to Subsection 21A.36.010.B, "One Principal Building Per Lot", of this title. The space between buildings shall include a pedestrian walkway at least five feet wide. G. Upper Floor Stepback: I. The upper floor stepback for street facing facades is dependent on the height of the building according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. For buildings that are between 78' to 1045, or between 6 and 8 stories, a minimum stepback of 10' is required at least 25' above grade. For buildings above 105', or 8 stories, the step back shall be a minimum of 15' from the property line. The stepback 76 shall appear after the first two to five floors. In addition to these provisions, 20% of the entire building facade can meet the street at the lot line with no stepback. An alternative to this street facing facade stepback requirement may be utilized for buildings limited to 45' or less in height by the zoning ordinance: those buildings may provide a 4' minimum depth canopy,roof structure, or balcony that extends from the face of the building toward the street at a height of between 12' and 15' above the adjacent sidewalk. Such extension(s) shall extend horizontally parallel to the street for a minimum of 50% of the face of the building and may encroach into a setback as permitted per Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B, "Obstructions in Required Yards", of this title. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.G1 Upper Floor Stepback 20%ofthe 'a a oCa 1 For buildings that are between 78' to 104', or between 6 and 8 stories, a minimum stepback of 10' is required at least 25' above grade. The stepback shall appear after the first 26' to 65', or 2 to 5 floors. In addition to these provisions, 20% of the entire building facade can meet the street at the lot line with no stepback. 2 For buildings above 104', or 8 stories, the stepback shall be a minimum of 15' from the property line. The stepback shall appear after the first 26' to 65', or 2 to 5 floors. In addition to these provisions, 20% of the entire building facade can meet the street at the lot line with no stepback. 2. Stepbacks are required for full floors above the height, according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter,measured from average finished grade that have facades facing single- or two-family residential districts with a permitted height that is 35' or less, a public trail or public open space. The purpose of this 77 provision is to reduce the impact that buildings over a certain height have on abutting properties when the abutting properties have a permitted height that is 35' or less. 3. For street facing facades the first full floor, and all additional floors, above thirty feet (30') in height from average finished grade shall be stepped back a minimum horizontal distance from the front line of building, according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. An alternative to this street facing facade step back requirement may be utilized for buildings limited to forty five feet(45') or less in height by the zoning ordinance: those buildings may provide a four foot (4') minimum depth canopy,roof structure, or balcony that extends from the face of the building toward the street at a height of between twelve feet(12') and fifteen feet (15') above the adjacent sidewalk. Such extension(s) shall extend horizontally parallel to the street for a minimum of fifty percent(50%) of the face of the building and may encroach into a setback as permitted per Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B, "Obstructions in Required Yards", of this title. 4. Floors rising above thirty feet(30') in height shall be stepped back fifteen(15) horizontal feet from the building foundation at grade for building elevations that are adjacent to a public street, public trail, or public open space. This stepback does not apply to buildings that have balconies on floors rising above thirty feet (30') in height. H. Exterior Lighting: All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed down to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. Exterior lighting shall not strobe, flash or flicker. I. Parking Lot Lighting: If a parking lot/structure is adjacent to a residential zoning district or land use, any poles for the parking lot/structure security lighting are limited to 16' in height and the globe must be shielded and the lighting directed down to minimize light encroachment onto adjacent residential properties or into upper level residential units in multi-story buildings. Lightproof fencing is required adjacent to residential properties. J. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment for a building shall be screened from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of such impact-minimizing siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B, "Obstructions in Required Yards", of this title. K. Screening of Service Areas: Service areas, loading docks, refuse containers,utility meters, and similar areas shall be fully screened from public view. All screening enclosures viewable from the street shall be either incorporated into the building architecture or shall incorporate building materials and detailing compatible with the building being served. Waste and loading facilities are prohibited from being located on street-facing facades and shall be co-located and screened when possible. Exceptions to 78 this requirement may be approved by the planning director when the service provides power or some form of utilities in and around the surrounding area. Exemptions may also be approved through the site plan review process when a permit applicant demonstrates that it is not feasible to accommodate these activities on the block interior. If such activities are permitted adjacent to a public street, a visual screening design approved by the planning director shall be required. All screening devices shall be a minimum of one foot higher than the object being screened, and in the case of fences and/or masonry walls the height shall not exceed eight feet. Dumpsters must be located a minimum of 25' from any building on an adjacent lot that contains a residential dwelling or be located inside of an enclosed building or structure. L. Ground Floor Residential Entrances for Dwellings with Individual Unit Entries: For the zoning districts listed in Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter, all attached dwellings including attached single-family dwellings, townhomes, row houses, multi-family developments with ground floor uses, and other similar housing types located on the ground floor shall have a primary entrance facing the street for each unit adjacent to a street. Units may have a primary entrance located on a courtyard, midblock walkway, or other similar area if the street facing facades also have a primary entrance. M. Parking Garages or Structures: The following standards shall apply to parking garages or structures whether stand alone or incorporated into a building: 1. Parking structures shall have an external skin designed to improve visual character when adjacent to a public street or other public space. Examples include heavy gauge metal screen,precast concrete panels; live green or landscaped walls, laminated or safety glass, decorative photovoltaic panels or match the building materials and character of the principal use. The planning director may approve other decorative materials not listed if the materials are in keeping with the decorative nature of the parking structure. 2. Facade elements shall align to parking levels and there shall be no sloped surfaces visible from a public street, public trail or public open space. 3. Internal circulation must be designed such that parking surfaces are level (or without any slopes) along all primary facades. All ramping between levels need to be placed along the secondary facade or to the center of the structure. Parking structures shall be designed to conceal the view of all parked cars and drive ramps from public spaces. 4. Elevator and stairs shall be highlighted architecturally so visitors can easily access these entry points both internally and externally. 79 5. Signage and wayfinding shall be integrated with the architecture of the parking structure and be architecturally compatible with the design. The entrances of public parking structures shall be clearly signed from public streets. 6. Interior garage lighting shall not produce glaring sources toward adjacent properties while providing safe and adequate lighting levels. The use of sensor dimmable LEDs and white stained ceilings are a good strategy to control light levels on site while improving energy efficiency. 7. Where a driveway crosses a public sidewalk, the driveway shall be a different color, texture, or paving material than the sidewalk to warn drivers of the possibility of pedestrians in the area. 8. The ground floor of all parking structures shall be wrapped along all street frontages with habitable space that is occupied by a use that is allowed in the zone as a permitted or conditional use. 9. Parking structures shall be designed to minimize vehicle noise and odors on the public realm. Venting and fan locations shall not be located next to public spaces and shall be located as far as possible from adjacent residential land uses. 10. If the parking structure is adjacent to a midblock walkway, pedestrian oriented elements shall be provided. These may include,but are not limited to seating and vegetation. N. Residential Character in RB District: 1. All roofs shall be pitched and of a hip or gable design except additions or expansions to existing buildings may be of the same roof design as the original building; 2. The remodeling of residential buildings for retail or office use shall be allowed only if the residential character of the exterior is maintained; 3. The front building elevation shall contain not more than 50% glass; 4. Signs shall conform with special sign regulations of Chapter 21A.46, "Signs", of this title; 5. Building orientation shall be to the front or corner side yard; and 6. Building additions shall consist of materials, color and exterior building design consistent with the existing structure,unless the entire structure is resurfaced. O. Primary Entrance Design in SNB District: Primary entrance design shall consist of at least two of the following design elements at the primary entrance, so that the primary entrance is architecturally prominent and clearly visible from the abutting street. 1. Architectural details such as arches, friezes, tile work, canopies, or awnings. 2. Integral planters or wing walls that incorporate landscape or seating. 3. Enhanced exterior light fixtures such as wall sconces, light coves with concealed light sources, or decorative pedestal lights. 80 4. A repeating pattern of pilasters projecting from the facade wall by a minimum of eight inches or architectural or decorative columns. 5. Recessed entrances that include a minimum stepback of two feet from the primary facade and that include glass on the sidewalls. P. Streetscape Standards: These standards are required for landscaping that is within the public right of way. This is defined as the space between the private property line and the back of the curb. 1. Tree Canopy Coverage: No tree canopy shall cover less than the specified percentage according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. The defined percentage represents the canopy coverage at maturity. At installation, a minimum of 20% of all trees shall have a minimum caliper of 3". Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.I Tree Canopy Coverage 1 No tree canopy coverage shall cover less than the specified percentage according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. 2. Minimum Vegetation Standards: The percentage of vegetation shall be no less than the specified amount according to Chapter 21A.48. The vegetation shall be planted in the public right of way. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.2 Minimum Vegetation Standards (References the measurements in Table D, Downtown Districts) 81 I The percentage of vegetation shall be no less than the specified percentage according to Chapter 21A.48. 2 Vegetation shall be planted in the public right of way. 3. Street Trees: Street trees are required and subject to the regulations in Section 21A.48.080. In addition to those standards, for every new development, there shall be one street tree planted for every 30' of street frontage. 4. Soil Volume: In order to promote street tree health and longevity, each tree shall have an adequate volume of soil. The soil volume surrounding a tree shall be 750ft3 to 1,000ft3 per tree, provided that this area is exclusive of the soils volume calculation for adjacent trees. The soil volume may be reduced if under ground utilities are present within the soil volume and the soil volume cannot be extended horizontally due to other obstructions or barriers. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.4 Soil Volume `j 1 The soil volume surrounding a tree shall be 750ft3 to 1,00oft3 per tree,provided that this area is exclusive of the soils volume calculation for adjacent trees. 82 5. Minimize Curb Cuts: As an effort to emphasize the public realm and encourage the safety of pedestrians,places where cars intersect the street shall be minimized. More specifically, curb cuts are encouraged to be concentrated at midblock and alley locations. The sidewalk material shall continue at ground level of the curb cuts. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.5 Minimize Curb Cuts j� :0 � ms =J� p � Gr" pp�� -------------- 1 Curb cuts are encouraged to be concentrated at midblock and alley locations. 6. Overhead Cover: Overhead covers are required at building entrances to provide weather protection to pedestrians and may encroach into a required yard as indicated in this section or into a public right of way with an approved encroachment agreement with the City. These coverings are required to be between 9 and 14' above the level of the sidewalk. They shall also provide coverage with a minimum depth of 6' and project no closer to the curb than 3'. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.6 Overhead Cover 83 ® ® ® M® ®B MID M ®® ® ® � � 03 rn 1 The shade structure shall occur between 9 and 14' above the level of the sidewalk. The shade shall provide a minimum coverage of 6' in width. The cover shall project no closer than 3' to the curb. 7. Streetscape Landscaping: All vegetation used along the streetscape must comply with the landscape requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.48. Q. Height Transitions: This measurement is applied to control the size and shape of the building envelope or portion thereof for such purposes as promoting transition in scale between buildings of different height,protecting access to sunlight, and/or limiting shadow and overlook on neighboring properties. A transition may be achieved by relating a building's form to those that surround it through the following way. An angular plane of 45°, measured from the relevant property lines, should be used to provide a frame of reference for transition in scale from proposed high-rise buildings down to lower scale areas. The transition is required when development is directly adjacent to a zone with a height maximum of 35' or less or adjacent to a local historic landmark site. These standards do not apply when a right of way separates the buildings. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.Q Height Transitions 84 ...........AnIpbrAlmi LI - 1 An angular plane of 45°, measured from the relevant property lines, should be used to provide a frame of reference for transition in scale from proposed high-rise buildings down to lower scale areas. The transition is required when development is adjacent to a zone with a height maximum of 35' or less or adjacent to a local historic landmark site. R. Horizontal articulation: Buildings shall be designed in such a way that they are appropriately scaled to the pedestrian at the street level. This scale is emphasized through authentic breaks in the facade. These breaks shall be articulated on the primary facade to the full height of the building to the cornice or to the full height of the building to the first horizontal setback. There may be a maximum spacing of 60' for horizontal articulation. Horizontal articulation shall be achieved through one of the following architectural features: a. Bay windows: Bay windows shall be a minimum of two feet in depth and four feet in width; or b. Recessed entrances or windows: These shall be recessed a minimum of four feet in depth and six feet in width. Canopies or awnings are required at primary building entries; or c. Niches: Niches shall be a minimum of two feet in depth and four feet in width; or d. Openings for gates that are a minimum of four feet in width; or e. Porches measuring at least 48 square feet; or f. Colonnades that are a minimum of four feet in width. 85 SECTION 11. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.060. That Section 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.060: DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRED IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT: This section identifies each design standard and to which zoning districts the standard applies. If a box is checked(X), that standard is required. If a box is blank, it is not required. If a specific dimension or detail of a design standard differs among zoning districts or differs from the definition, it will be indicated within the box. In cases where a dimension in this table conflicts with a dimension in the definition, the dimensions listed in the table shall take precedence. 86 TABLE 21A.37.060 A. Residential Districts: District Standard(Code RMF-30 RMF-35 RMF-45 RMF-75 RB R-MU-35 R-MU-45 R-NW RO Section) Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 75 75 Ground floor use+visual interest(%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) 80 80 (21A.37.050B.3) Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 60 60 40 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 75 75 X Blank wall: maximum length (feet) 15 15 15 (21 A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: maximum length(feet) (21A.37.050.F) Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G) 10 Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.1) Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.1) X X Screening of mechanical equipment(21A.37.050.J) X X X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X X X Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries(21A.37.050.L) 87 Parking garages or structures(21A.37.050.M) Residential character in RB District X (21A.37.050.N) B. Commercial Districts: District Standard(Code CSHBD i Section SNB CN CB CS CC CG TSA Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 80 802 80 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) 60/25 70/20 60/25 Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 80 70 90 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 60 60 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 40 40 40 40 60 60 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 25 Reflective Glass:ground floor(%)(21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass:upper floors(%)(21A.37.050.C.2) 40 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) X X X X X 40 40 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 15 15 15 15 20 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet)(21A.37.050.F) 200 200 200 Upper floor stepback(feet) (21A.37.050.G.3) 15 X Faqade height for required stepback(21A.37.050.G.2) 30 Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X X X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.1) X X X X X X X X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X X X X X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K) X X X X X X 88 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual X unit entries 21A.37.050.L Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Primary entrance design SNB District (21A.37.050.0) X Tree canopy coverage(%)(21A.37.050.P.1) 40 Minimum vegetation standards(%)(21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees(21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume(21A.37.050.P.4) X Minimize curb cuts(21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover(21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping(21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions:angular plane for adjacent buildings 21A.37.050.Q Horizontal articulation(21A.37.050.R) X Notes: 1. These standards only apply to the portion of the CG district within the boundaries of north of 900 S, south of 200 S, west 300 W and east of I-15. 2. Maximum width of the entrance shall be 35' if the additional 20% is used for an entrance to a parking structure. 89 C. Manufac ring Districts: Standard(Code District Section) M-1 M-2 Ground floor use (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use +visual interest (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials:ground floor(%) (21 A.37.050.B.1) Building materials:upper floors(%) (21 A.37.050.B.2) Glass:ground floor(%) (21A.37.050.C.1) Glass:upper floors(%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances(feet) (21A.37.050.D) Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21 A.37.050.F) Upper floor stepback(feet) (21A.37.050.G) Lighting: exterior X X (21A.37.050.H) Lighting:parking X X lot (21A.37.050.I) Screening of mechanical equipment (21 A.37.050.J) 90 Screening of service areas (21 A.37.050.K) Ground floor residential entrances (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) D. Downtown Districts: Standard(Code District Section) D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Ground floor use(%) 90 80 80 80 (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use+ 80/10 70/20 70/20 70/20 visual interest(%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: 70 80 70' 70 ground floor (%)(21A.37.050.B.1) Building materials: 50 50 70' 50 upper floors (%)(21A.37.050.B.2) Glass:ground floor(%) 60 60 60 60 (21A.37.050.C.1) Glass:upper floors(%) 50 50 50 50 (21A.37.050.C.2) Reflective Glass: 0 0 0 0 ground floor(%) (21 A.37.050.C.1) Reflective Glass:upper 50 50 50 50 floors(%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances 40 40 60 60 (feet)(21A.37.050.D) Blank wall:maximum 20 20 20 20 length (feet)(21A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: 150 200 150 150 maximum length(feet) (21 A.37.050.F) Upper floor stepback X X X X (feet)(21A.37.050.G.1) Lighting: X X exterior(21A.37.050.H) 91 Lighting:parking lot X (21 A.37.050.I) Screening of X X X X mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) Screening of service X X X X areas(21A.37.050.K) Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or X- X, structures (21 A.37.050.M) Tree canopy coverage 40 40 40 40 (%)(21A.37.050.P.1) Minimum vegetation X X X X standards (21A.37.050.P.2) Street trees X X X X (21 A.37.050.P.3) Soil volume X X X X (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts X X X X (21A.37.050.P.5) Overhead cover X X X X (21 A.37.050.P.6) Streetscape landscaping X X X X (21A.37.050.P.7) Height transitions: X X X angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) Horizontal articulation X X X X (21A.37.050.R) Notes: 1. In the D-3 zoning district this percentage applies to all sides of the building,not just the front or street facing facade. 2. Parking structures shall be located behind principal buildings. This requirement may be modified so that structures may be located at least 15' from front and corner side lot lines if a minimum of seventy five percent(75%)of the ground floor adjacent to a sidewalk is used for retail goods/service establishments, office and/or restaurant space to encourage pedestrian activity.The facades of the ground floor shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. 92 E. Gateway Districts: Standard (Code Section) District G-MU Ground floor use (%) 80 (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use +visual 70/20 interest(%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground 70 floor(%) (21A.37.050.B.1) Building materials: upper 50 floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.2) Glass: ground floor(%) 60 (21A.37.050.C.1) Glass: upper floors (%) 50 (21A.37.050.C.2) Reflective Glass: ground floor 0 (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) Reflective Glass: upper floors 50 (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) 40 (21A.37.050.D) Blank wall: maximum length 15 (feet) (21A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: maximum 150 length(feet) (21A.37.050.F) Upper floor stepback(feet) X (21A.37.050.G.1) Lighting: X 1 exterior(21A.37.050.H) Lighting: parking lot XI (21A.37.050.I) Screening of mechanical X equipment(21A.37.050.J) Screening of service areas X (21A.37.050.K) Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) 93 Parking garages or structures XZ (21A.37.050.M) Tree canopy coverage (%) 40 (21A.37.050.P.1) Minimum vegetation standards X (21A.37.050.P.2) Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) X Minimize curb cuts X (21A.37.050.P.5) Overhead cover X (21A.37.050.P.6) Streetscape landscaping X (21A.37.050.P.7) Height transitions: angular X plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) Horizontal articulation X (21A.37.050.R) Notes: 1. Sidewalks and street lamps installed in the public right-of-way shall be of the type specified in the sidewalk/street lighting policy document adopted by the city. 2. Parking structures shall be located behind principal buildings. This requirement may be modified so that structures may be located at least 15' from front and corner side lot lines if a minimum of seventy five percent(75%) of the ground floor adjacent to a sidewalk is used for retail goods/service establishments, office and/or restaurant space to encourage pedestrian activity. The facades of the ground floor shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. 94 F. Special Purpose Districts: Standard District (Code Section) RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 PL PL-2 I UI OS NOS MH EI MU Ground floor use (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use +visual interest (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials:ground floor(%) (21 A.37.050.B.1) Building materials:upper floors(%) (21 A.37.050.B.2) Glass:ground 40-70 floor(%) (21A.37.050.C.1) Glass:upper floors(%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building X entrances(feet) (21A.37.050.D) Blank wall: 15 maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21 A.37.050.F) 95 Upper floor stepback(feet) (21 A.37.050.G) Lighting: exterior X X X (21A.37.050.H) Lighting:parking X X lot (21A.37.050.I) Screening of X mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) Screening of X service areas (21 A.37.050.K) Ground floor residential entrances (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) Tree canopy coverage(%) (21A.37.050.P.1) Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) Soil Volume (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) 96 Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 97 G. Form Based Districts: District Standard (Code Section) FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-UN3 FB-SC FB-SE Ground floor use (%) 75 75' 75 75 (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground 70 70 70 70 70 floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) Building materials: upper 70 70 70 70 70 floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) Glass: ground floor (%) 601 601 601 601 601 (21A.37.050.C.1) Glass: upper floors (%) 15 15 15 15 15 (21A.37.050.C.2) Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) 75 75 75 75 75 (21A.37.050.D) Blank wall: maximum length 15 15 30 30 30 (feet) (21A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: 200 200 200 200 200 maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) Upper floor step back (feet) X X X X (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior X X X X X (21A.37.050.H) Lighting: parking lot X X X (21A.37.050.I) Screening of mechanical X X X equipment (21A.37.050.J) 98 Screening of service areas X X X2 (21A.37.050.K.1) Ground floor residential X X X entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures X X X X X (21A.37.050.M) Tree canopy coverage (%) 40 40 40 (21A.37.050.P.1) Minimum vegetation standards X X X (21A.37.050.P.2) Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X X X X X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) X X X Minimize curb cuts X X X (21A.37.050.P.5) Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) Streetscape landscaping X X X (21A.37.050.P.7) Height transitions: angular X X X plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) Horizontal articulation X X X (21A.37.050.R) Notes: 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent(20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house. 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the fagade length shall be an"active use" as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an"active use"toward the 30%minimum. 99 SECTION 12. Amending the Text of Section 21A.44.060. That Section 21A.44.060 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.44.060: PARKING LOCATION AND DESIGN: All required parking areas shall be located and designed in accordance with the standards in this Chapter 21A.44: Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading and the standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. Modifications to the standards of this Section 21A.44.060 may be granted through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59: Design Review. A. Generally: 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this ordinance shall be located on the same lot as the building or use served,unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, "Off-Site Parking Permitted". 2. Biodetention and Landscape Islands in General and Neighborhood Center Contexts: For parking lots with one hundred(100) or more parking spaces in the General Context and Neighborhood Center Context areas, parking lot islands or biodetention areas shall be provided on the interior of the parking lot to help direct traffic flow and to provide landscaped areas within such lots. 3. Parking Location and Setbacks: All parking shall comply with the parking restrictions within yards pursuant to Table 21A.44.060-A, "Parking Location and Setback Requirements". TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N=parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Corner Side Interior Side Rear Lot Line Lot Line Lot Line Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential(FR Districts,RIB,RMF,RO) FR N 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, Parking in driveways that comply with 0 ft. all applicable city standards is exempt 100 SR-2 from this restriction. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family RMF-30 residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. 0 ft. when abutting N any 1-2 family RMF-35, RMF- residential 45, RMF-75, district. Limited RO to 1 side yard except for single- family attached lots. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 15 ft. residential district CS 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070.I M-1 M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG- 0 ft. 5' N AG-20 BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. 101 FP 6 ft. 0 ft. 1 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 30 ft. 10 ft. PL 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district PL-2 20 ft. RP 30 ft. 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB , CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Limited to 1 side 0 ft.; or 10 ft. yard, 0 ft.; or when Surface Parking: N 10 ft. when abutting any R-MU-35, R- Parking Structures: 45' or located abutting any 1-2 1-2 family MU-45 behind principal building family residential residential district district RB, SR-3, FB- UN 1' N 0 ft. FB-SE URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBDI 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district N CSHBD2 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N 0 ft. Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 102 21A.30.010.F Parking Structures: N Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located MU behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 0 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located side yard behind principal structure TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 See Subsection 2 1 A.44.060.B.1 D-3 D-4 See Subsections 21A.44.060.B.1, 21A.30.010.F and 21A.31.010.H G-MU 0 ft. FB-UN2, FB- N UN3, FB-SC TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential 0 ft.; or 10 ft. district when Surface Parking: 30 ft. abutting any R-MU Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located 1-2 family behind principal structure Surface parking residential at least 30 ft. district from front lot line. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting when any 1-2 family abutting any residential 1-2 family district; residential UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft. Hospitals: 10 ft. district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 103 4. Off-Site Parking Permitted: When allowed as either a permitted or conditional use per Chapter 21A.33, "Land Use Tables", off-site parking facilities may be used to satisfy the requirements of this chapter and shall comply with the following standards: a. Maximum Distance of Off-Site Parking: Off-site parking shall be located according to the distance established in Table 2 1 A.44.060-B, "Maximum Distances for Off-Site Parking" (measured in a straight line from the property boundary of the principal use for which the parking serves to the closest point of the parking area). Table 21A.44.060-B: Maximum Distances for Off-Site Parking: Context Maximum Distance to Off-Site Parking Neighborhood Center General 600 ft. Legal Nonconforming Use in Residential District Urban Center 1,200 ft. Transit 1,000 ft. b. Documentation Required: (1) The owners of record involved in an off-site parking arrangement shall submit written documentation of the continued availability of the off-site parking arrangement to the planning director for review. (2) The planning director shall approve the off-site parking arrangement if the director determines the location meets the standards of this section. No zoning or use approval shall be issued until the director has approved the off-site parking arrangement and the documentation has been recorded in the office of the Salt Lake County Recorder. (3) If the off-site parking arrangement is later terminated or modified and the planning director determines that the termination or modification has resulted in traffic congestion, overflow parking in residential neighborhoods, or threats to pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle safety,the property owners of the uses for which the off-site parking was provided may be held in violation of this chapter. 104 5. Circulation Plan Required: Any application for a building permit shall include a site plan, drawn to scale, and fully dimensioned, showing any off street parking or loading facilities to be provided in compliance with this title. A tabulation of the number of off street vehicle and bicycle parking, loading, and stacking spaces required by this chapter shall appear in a conspicuous place on the plan. 6. Driveways and Access: a. Compliance with Other Adopted Regulations: (1) Parking lots shall be designed in compliance with applicable city codes, ordinances, and standards, including but not limited to Title 12 of this code: Vehicles and Traffic and the Off Street Parking Standards Manual to the maximum degree practicable, with respect to: (a) Minimum distances between curb cuts; (b) Proximity of curb cuts to intersections; (c) Provisions for shared driveways; (d) Location, quantity and design of landscaped islands; and (e) Design of parking lot interior circulation system. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.a(1) above, relocation of a driveway for a single-family, two-family, or twin home residence in any zoning district shall only be required when the residence is replaced, and shall not be required when the residence is expanded or renovated in compliance with the city code. b. Access Standards: Access to all parking facilities shall comply with the following standards: (1) To the maximum extent practicable, all off street parking facilities shall be designed with vehicular access to a street or alley that will least interfere with automobile,bicycle, and pedestrian traffic movement. (2) Parking facilities in excess of five (5) spaces that access a public street shall be designed to allow vehicles to enter and exit the lot in a forward direction. (3) Parking facilities on lots with less than one hundred feet(100') of street frontage shall have only one curb cut, and lots with one hundred feet (100') of street frontage or more shall be limited to two curb cuts, unless the transportation director determines that additional curb cuts are necessary to ensure pedestrian,bicycle, and vehicle safety or to comply with the fire code. 105 Public safety uses shall be exempt from limitations on curb cuts. (4) All vehicular access roads/driveways shall be surfaced as required in accordance with Subsection 21A.44.060.A.8, "Surface Materials". c. Driveway Standards: All driveways shall comply with the following standards: (1) Driveway Location in Residential Zoning Districts: With the exception of legal shared driveways, driveways shall be at least twenty feet(20') from street corner property lines and five feet(5') from any public utility infrastructure such as power poles, fire hydrants, and water meters. Except for entrance and exit driveways leading to approved parking areas, no curb cuts or driveways are permitted. (2) Driveway Widths: All driveways serving residential uses shall be a minimum eight feet wide and shall comply with the standards for maximum driveway widths listed in Table 21A.44.060-C, "Minimum and Maximum Driveway Width". TABLE 21A.44.060-C: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY WIDTH: Minimum Driveway Width Maximum Driveway (in front and corner side Width* Zoning District yard) (in front and corner side yard) SR-1, SR-2 and SR-3 8 ft. 22 ft. MH 8 ft. 16 ft. Other Residential Zoning Districts 8 ft. 30 ft. M-1 and M-2 12 ft. single lane and 24 ft. 50 ft. for two-way Other Non-Residential Zoning 12 ft. single lane and 24 ft. 30 ft. Districts for two-way * Maximum width is for all driveways combined when more than one driveway is provided (3) Shared Driveways: Shared driveways, where two or more properties share one driveway access, may be permitted if the transportation director determines that the design and location of the shared driveway access will not create adverse impacts on traffic congestion or public safety. 106 (4) Driveway Surface: All driveways providing access to parking facilities shall be improved and maintained pursuant to the standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 7. Minimum Dimensional Standards: All parking spaces shall comply with the dimensional standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 8. Surface Materials: All parking spaces shall comply with the standards for surfacing of access, driving, and parking surfacing in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 9. Grading and Stormwater Management: All surface parking areas shall comply with city grading and stormwater management standards and shall be reviewed for best management practices by Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. Refer to the Salt Lake City Stormwater Master Plan, Storm Drainage Manual, and Green Infrastructure Toolbox for additional information. 10. Sight Distance Triangles: All driveways and intersections shall comply with the sight distance triangle standards as defined in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 11. Landscaping and Screening: All parking areas and facilities shall comply with the landscaping and screening standards in Chapter 21A.48, "Landscaping and Buffers". 12. Lighting: Where a parking area or parking lot is illuminated,the light source shall be shielded so that the light source is not directly visible from any abutting property or abutting private or public street. 13. Signs: All signs in parking areas or related to parking facilities shall comply with Chapter 21A.46, "Signs", and applicable provisions of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 14. Pedestrian Walkways: a. Surface parking lots with between twenty-five (25) and one hundred(100)parking spaces shall provide a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk through the parking lot to the primary entrance of the principal building. Pedestrian walkways shall be identified by a change in color, material, surface texture, or grade elevation from surrounding driving surfaces. b. Parking lots with more than one hundred(100)parking spaces shall provide: (1) One or more grade-separated pedestrian walkway(s), at least five feet(5') in width, and located in an area that is not a driving surface, leading from the farthest row of parking spaces to the primary entrance of the principal building. 107 (2) Vehicles shall not overhang the pedestrian walkway(s). (3) Where the walkway(s) crosses a drive aisle, pedestrian walkway(s) shall be identified by a change in color, material, surface texture, or grade elevation from surrounding driving surfaces. (4) One pedestrian walkway meeting these standards shall be provided for each one hundred(100)parking spaces provided on site or part thereof, after the first one hundred(100)parking spaces. 15. Parking Garages: The following standards shall apply to all above-ground parking garages except those located in the FB zones subject to Subsection 21A.27.030.C.4, whether freestanding or incorporated into a building: a. Each facade or a parking garage adjacent to a public street or public space shall have an external skin designed to conceal the view of all parked cars. Examples include heavy gauge metal screen,precast concrete panels, live green or landscaped walls, laminated or safety glass, or decorative photovoltaic panels. b. No horizontal length of the parking garage facade shall extend longer than 40 feet without the inclusion of architectural elements such as decorative grillwork, louvers, translucent screens, alternating building materials, and other external features to avoid visual monotony. Facade elements shall align with parking levels. c. Internal circulation shall allow parking surfaces to be level (without any slope) along each parking garage facade adjacent to a public street or public space. All ramps between levels shall be located along building facades that are not adjacent to a public street or public space, or shall be located internally so that they are not visible from adjacent public streets or public spaces. d. The location of elevators and stairs shall be highlighted through the use of architectural features or changes in facade colors, textures, or materials so that visitors can easily identify these entry points. e. Interior parking garage lighting shall not produce glaring sources toward adjacent properties while providing safe and adequate lighting levels. The use of sensor dimmable LEDs and white stained ceilings are recommended to control light levels on-site while improving energy efficiency. f. In the Urban Center Context and Transit Context areas, the street-level facades of all parking garages shall be designed to meet applicable building code standards for habitable space to allow at least one permitted or conditional use, other than parking, to be located where the parking garage is located. 108 g. Vent and fan locations shall not be located on parking garage facades facing public streets or public spaces, or adjacent to residential uses,to the greatest extent practicable. 16. Tandem Parking: Where more than one parking space is required to be provided for a residential dwelling unit,the parking spaces may be designed as tandem parking spaces, provided that: a. No more than two required spaces may be included in the tandem parking layout; and b. Each set of two tandem parking spaces shall be designated for a specific residential unit. 17. Cross-Access Between Adjacent Uses: The transportation director may require that access to one or more lots be through shared access points or cross-access through adjacent parcels when the transportation director determines that individual access to abutting parcels or limited distance between access points will create traffic safety hazards due to traffic levels on adjacent streets or nearby intersections. Such a determination shall be consistent with requirements of state law regarding property access from public streets. Required cross- access agreements shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office. B. Zone Specific Location and Design Standards: 1. D-1, D-3, D-4, and G-MU Zoning Districts: The following regulations shall apply to surface or above-ground parking facilities. No special design and setback restrictions shall apply to below-ground parking facilities. a. Above-ground parking facilities located within the block corner areas and on Main Street, shall be located behind principal buildings and: (1) All above-ground parking facilities that front a street shall contain uses other than parking along the entire length of the building fagade and along all stories or levels of the building. (2) Vehicle access to parking shall be located to the side of the building or as far from the street corner as possible unless further restricted by this title. b. Parking garages shall meet the following: (1) Retail goods/service establishments, offices and/or restaurants shall be provided on the first floor adjacent to the front or corner side lot line. The facades of such first floors shall be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. (2) Levels of parking above the first level facing the front or corner side lot line 109 shall have floors and/or facades that are horizontal, not sloped. (3) Landscape Requirements: Surface parking lots, where allowed shall have a minimum landscaped setback of fifteen feet(15') and shall meet interior parking lot landscaping requirements as outlined in Chapter 21A.48, "Landscaping and Buffers". 2. TSA Transit Station Area District: New uses and development or redevelopment within the TSA Transit Station Area District shall comply with the following standards. a. Surface Parking on Corner Properties: On corner properties, surface parking lots shall be located behind principal buildings or at least sixty feet(60') from the intersection of the front and corner side lot lines. b. Surface Parking in the Core Area: Surface parking lots in the core area are required to be located behind or to the side of the principal building. (1) When located to the side of a building, the parking lot shall be: (a) Set back a minimum of thirty feet(30') from a property line adjacent to a public street. The area between the parking lot and the property line adjacent to a public street shall be landscaped or activated with outdoor dining, plazas, or similar features; (b) Screened with a landscaped hedge or wall that is at least thirty-six inches (36") above grade and no taller than forty-two inches (42") above grade. Landscaping berms are not permitted; and (c) No wider than what is required for two rows of parking and one drive aisle as provided in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. (2) Unless a second driveway is necessary to comply with the fire code, a maximum of one driveway and drive aisle shall be permitted per street frontage. The access point shall be located a minimum of one hundred feet (100') from the intersection of the front and corner side lot lines. If the front or corner side lot line is less than one hundred feet (100') in length, then the edge of the drive approach shall be located within twenty feet(20') of the side or rear property line. c. Surface Parking in the Transition Area: (1) Surface parking lots in the transition area are required to be located behind the principal building or to the side of a principal building. (2) When located to the side of a principal building, the parking lot shall be: 110 (a) Set back so that no portion of the parking area(other than the driveway) shall be closer to the street than the front wall setback of the building. In cases where the front wall of the building is located within five feet(5')of a property line adjacent to a street, the parking lot shall be setback a minimum of eight feet(8'). The space between the parking lot and the property line adjacent to a street shall be landscaped or activated with outdoor dining, plazas, or similar features; and (b) Screened with a landscaped hedge or wall that is at least thirty-six inches (36") above grade and no taller than forty-two inches (42") above grade. Landscaped berms are not permitted. d. Off street parking for police services are exempt from landscape setback dimensions when off street parking is necessary for a police substation located in an existing building. This exemption permits parking for emergency vehicles when the landscape setback also fulfills any requirement for open space area on the property. The extent of the exemption shall be the minimum necessary to accommodate the necessary parking. If the police substation use vacates the space, the landscaping that was removed, if any, shall be restored in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations in place at the time the use ceases. C. Recreational Vehicle Parking: 1. Generally: a. Recreational vehicle parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, required off street vehicle parking spaces. b. Recreational vehicles shall not be used for storage of goods, materials, or equipment other than those that are customarily associated with the recreational vehicle. c. All recreational vehicles shall be stored in a safe and secure manner. Any tie downs, tarpaulins, or ropes shall be secured from flapping in windy conditions. d. Recreational vehicles shall not be occupied as a dwelling while parked on the property. e. Recreational vehicle parking is permitted in any enclosed structure conforming to building code and zoning requirements for the zoning district in which it is located. f. Recreational vehicle parking outside of an approved enclosed structure shall be permitted for each residence and shall be limited to one motor home or travel trailer and a total of two recreational vehicles of any type. III g. Recreational vehicle parking outside of an enclosed structure shall comply with the standards in this section. 2. Front Yard Parking: Recreational vehicle parking is prohibited in any required or provided front yard. 3. Rear Yard Parking: Recreational vehicles may be parked in the rear yard when they are on a hard surfaced pad compliant with surfacing standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual and with access provided by either a hard surfaced driveway, hard surfaced drive strips or an access drive constructed of turf block materials with an irrigation system. 4. Side Yard Parking: Recreational vehicle parking in side yards shall be allowed only when topographical factors, the existence of mature trees, or the existence of properly permitted and constructed structures prohibit access to the rear yard. The existence of a fence or other structure that is not part of a building shall not constitute a lack of rear yard access. Any recreational vehicle parking area in a side yard shall: a. Be on a hard surface compliant with the Off Street Parking Standards Manual; b. Be accessed via a driveway compliant with driveway standards of this chapter; c. Not obstruct access to other required parking for the use. SECTION 13. Amending the Text of Chapter 21A.59. That Chapter 21A.59 of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Design Review), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 21A.59 DESIGN REVIEW SECTION: 21A.59.010: Purpose Statement 21A.59.020: Authority 21A.59.030: Design Review Process 21A.59.040: Scope of Modifications Authorized 21A.59.045: Design Review Standards Applicability 21A.59.050: Standards for Design Review 21A.59.060: Time Limit on Approved Applications for Design Review 21A.59.070: Effect of Approval of Applications for Design Review 21A.59.080: Modifications to Approved Design Review Plans 21A.59.010: PURPOSE STATEMENT: 112 The purpose of the design review chapter is to: a) establish a process and standards of review for minor modifications to applicable design standards, and b) ensure high quality outcomes for larger developments that have a significant impact on the city. The intent of the process to review applications for minor modifications to applicable design standards is to allow some flexibility in how the design standards are administered by recognizing that this title cannot anticipate all development issues that may arise. The intent of the process to review larger developments is to verify new developments are compatible with their surroundings, impacts to public infrastructure and public spaces are addressed, and that new development helps achieve development goals outlined in the adopted master plans of the city as identified in the purpose statements of each zoning district. 21A.59.020: AUTHORITY: Design review shall be required pursuant to the provisions of this chapter for developments and alternate building and site design features as specified within individual zoning districts before building permits may be issued. A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized in the specific zoning district. 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review objectives. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can 113 demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. B. Planning Commission Review: The following types of applications shall be reviewed by the planning commission. If an application for design review is not listed below, it shall be eligible for administrative review as outlined in Subsection A of this section: 1. All projects where planning commission review is required in the specific zoning district. 2. All projects that include a request for additional building height or a reduction to a minimum height requirement; 3. All projects that request additional square footage when authorized in the specific zoning district; 4. All projects that have applied for a modification of base zoning design standards but could not be approved administratively because they exceed limits identified in Section 21A.59.040, Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter. 5. Projects in the TSA Transit Station Area District that have a development score that requires planning commission review and approval. C. Planning Commission Decisions: When reviewing design review applications, the planning commission may take any of the following actions: 1. The commission shall approve a project if it finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the zoning district and applicable overlay district(s), the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives found in this chapter. 2. The commission may approve a project with conditions or modifications to the design if it determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, or the applicable design review objectives. 3. The commission shall deny the design of a project if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. D. H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Modifications to design standards for properties within an H Historic Preservation Overlay District are subject to the processes and applicable standards outlined in Section 21A.34.020 of this title and not this chapter. 21A.59.030: DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS: A. Presubmittal Meeting: A presubmittal meeting with planning staff is recommended prior to submitting an application for design review to ensure a detailed understanding of the application submission requirements and design review process. 114 B. Complete Application: The design review application is considered complete when it includes all of the following: 1. All of the application information required for site plan review as identified in Chapter 21A.58 of this title. 2. Photos showing the facades of adjacent development, trees on the site, general streetscape character, and views to and from the site. 3. Demonstration of compliance with the purpose of the individual zoning district in written narrative and graphic images. 4. Demonstration of compliance with the purpose of the applicable design standards of the individual zoning district in written narrative, graphic images, and relevant calculations. 5. Demonstration of compliance with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.060 of this chapter) in written narrative, graphics, images, and relevant calculations. 6. The zoning administrator may waive a submittal requirement if it is not necessary in order to determine if a request for a modification to a design standard complies with the standards of review. C. Public Notification and Engagement: 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an administrative decision for a modification to a specific design standard, the Pplanning director shall provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10 of this title. 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: a. Applications subject to planning commission review of this chapter are subject to notification requirements of Chapter 2.60 of this code. b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements found in Chapter 21A.10 of this title. 21A.59.040: SCOPE OF MODIFICATIONS AUTHORIZED: A. The authority of the planning director through the design review process shall be limited to modification of the specific element referenced within each zoning district. For planning director review, the design standards of the applicable zoning district(see Chapter 2 IA.37, "Design Standards", of this title), may be modified according to the following table. TABLE 21A.59.040 115 Design Standards Primary Modification Secondary Modification Allowed Allowed A. Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: 1. Ground floor use only Length: 10% Depth: 20% 2. Ground floor use and visual interest planning commission only B. Building Materials: 1. Ground floor building materials planning commission only 2. Upper floor building materials planning commission only C. Glass: 1. Ground floor glass 10% 2. Upper floor glass 10% D. Building Entrances 10% E. Maximum Length of Blank Wall 10% F. Maximum Length of Street- Facing 10% Facades G. Upper Floor Stepback: 1. For street facing facades 20% 2. For facades facing single- or two- planning commission family residential districts only B. The planning commission may consider modifications that exceed allowances listed in this section or any other design standard modification authorized in the base zoning district or Chapter 21A.37 of this title. 21A.59.045: DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS APPLICABILITY: A. Design Review applications shall be reviewed for compliance with the design review standards of Section 21A.59.050, as follows: 1. General Modification Requests: Applications to modify a design standard in Chapter 21A.37, or other zoning standard specifically authorized for modification through design review, shall be reviewed for compliance with the design review standards that are directly related to the purpose of the associated regulation requested for modification. 116 2. Additional Height or Square Footage Requests: Applications required to go through design review due to a height or square footage regulation shall be reviewed for compliance with all design review standards. 3. Transit Station Area Requests: For properties in a Transit Station Area District, applications required to go through design review due to not meeting the minimum points for administrative approval shall be reviewed for compliance with all design review standards. 4. All Other Requests: Any application not covered by Subsections 1 through 3 above, shall be subject to review for compliance with all design review standards. B. Exception: For those applications required to be reviewed against all design review standards, if an application complies with a standard in the base zoning district or with an applicable requirement in Chapter 21A.37 of this title, and that standard is directly related to a standard found in this section, the planning commission shall find that application complies with the specific standard for design review found in this section. 1. If there is no directly related zoning district standard or applicable requirement in Chapter 21A.37 of this title related to the design review standard, then the design review standard applies, and the commission shall not by default make the above finding. C. Alternatives: An applicant may propose an alternative to a standard for design review provided the proposal is consistent with the intent of the standard for design review. 21A.59.050: STANDARDS FOR DESIGN REVIEW: A. Any new development shall comply with the intent of the purpose statement of the zoning district and specific design regulations found within the zoning district in which the project is located as well as the city's adopted"urban design element" and adopted master plan policies and design guidelines governing the specific area of the proposed development. B. Development shall be primarily oriented to the sidewalk, not an interior courtyard or parking lot. I. Primary entrances shall face the public sidewalk(secondary entrances can face a parking lot). 2. Building(s) shall be sited close to the public sidewalk, following and responding to the desired development patterns of the neighborhood. 3. Parking shall be located within, behind, or to the side of buildings. C. Building facades shall include detailing and glass in sufficient quantities to facilitate pedestrian interest and interaction. 117 1. Locate active ground floor uses at or near the public sidewalk. 2. Maximize transparency of the street facing facades by prohibiting covering the ground floor glass with reflective treatments, interior walls, and other similar features that prevent passers-by from seeing inside of the building for non-residential uses. 3. Use or reinterpret traditional storefront elements like sign bands, clerestory glazing, articulation, and architectural detail at window transitions. 4. Locate outdoor dining patios, courtyards,plazas, habitable landscaped yards, and open spaces so that they have a direct visual connection to the street and outdoor spaces. D. Large building masses shall be divided into heights and sizes that relate to human scale. I. Relate building scale and massing to the size and scale of existing and anticipated buildings, such as alignments with established cornice heights,building massing, step-backs and vertical emphasis. 2. Modulate the design of a larger building using a series of vertical or horizontal emphases to equate with the scale (heights and widths) of the buildings in the context and reduce the visual width or height. 3. Include secondary elements such as balconies,porches, vertical bays, belt courses, fenestration and window reveals. 4. Reflect the scale and solid-to-void ratio of windows and doors of the established character of the neighborhood or that which is desired in the master plan. E. Building facades that exceed a combined contiguous building length of two hundred feet (200') shall include: I. Changes in vertical plane (breaks in facade); 2. Material changes; 3. Massing changes; 4. A minimum of 80% of the ground floor must be used for active, publicly accessible uses. Active uses are those that promote an active pedestrian environment through inclusion of uses that capture the attention of a passer-by. This includes retail establishments, retail services, civic spaces (theaters, museums, etc), restaurants,bars, art and craft studios, and other uses determined to be substantially similar by the planning director and/or commission; and 5. Stepback must be a minimum of 10' from the base of the building. This allows the base to be the primary defining element for the site and the adjacent public realm, reducing wind impacts, and opening sky views. The maximum height of the base of a proposed building should be equal to the width of the right of way if allowed in the zoning district to provide sufficient enclosure for the street without overwhelming the street. The minimum height of the base must be at least two stories. 118 A building over 200' in width shall include necessary separation from property lines to minimize the impact of shadows and development rights of adjacent properties. F. If provided,privately-owned public spaces shall include at least three of the six following elements: 1. At least one sitting space for each 250 square feet shall be included in the plaza. Seating shall be a minimum of 16" in height and 30" in width. Ledge benches shall have a minimum depth of 30'; 2. A mixture of areas that provide seasonal shade; 3. Trees in proportion to the space at a minimum of one tree per 800 square feet, at least 2" caliper when planted; 4. Water features or public art; 5. Outdoor dining areas; and 6. Other amenities not listed above that provide a public benefit. G. Building height shall be modified to relate to human scale and minimize negative impacts. In downtown and in the CSHBD Sugar House Business District, building height shall contribute to a distinctive city skyline. 1. Human scale: a. Utilize stepbacks to design a building that relate to the height and scale of adjacent and nearby buildings, or where identified, goals for future scale defined in adopted master plans. b. The minimum stepback for any building located in a zoning district that does not contain an upper level stepback provision shall be 10'. This stepback is only required for applications requesting additional height when authorized in the underlying zoning district. The stepback shall be applied to the first full floor of the building that is seeking the request for additional height. c. For buildings more than three stories or buildings with vertical mixed use, compose the design of a building with distinct base, to reduce the sense of apparent height. 2. Negative impacts: All buildings seeking additional height as authorized in the underlying zoning district shall be subject to the following standards: a. Modulate taller buildings vertically and horizontally so that it steps up or down to its neighbors. b. Minimize shadow impacts of building height on the public realm and semi-public spaces by varying building massing. Demonstrate impact from shadows due to building height for the portions of the building that are subject to the request for additional height. 119 c. Modify tall buildings to minimize wind impacts on public and private spaces, such as the inclusion of a wind break above the first level of the building. d. Design and orient to prevent snow, ice, or water from falling directly onto a public sidewalk,public space, neighboring property, or directly onto the walkway leading to the building entrance. 3. Cornices and rooflines: a. Cohesiveness: Shape and define rooflines to be cohesive with the building's overall form and composition. The roofline and architectural detailing, including cornices, shall be complimentary to the structure's scale, material, color, and form and create a change in plane of at least 6 inches, a change in material, utilizing at least one visible sloping plan along a minimum of 50% of the roofline on building elevations facing a street, or a change in material orientation to define the roof line of the building. b. Green Roof and Roof Deck: Include a green roof and/or accessible roof deck to support a more visually compelling roof landscape and reduce solar gain, air pollution, and the amount of water entering the stormwater system. H. Parking and on site circulation shall be provided with an emphasis on making safe pedestrian connections to the sidewalk, transit facilities, or midblock walkway. Parking is encouraged to be behind the principal building and away from pedestrian walkways. Parking lots and structures shall be setback a minimum of 25' from required midblock pedestrian access locations or as required in the underlying zoning district if the underlying zoning requires a larger setback. I. Waste and recycling containers, mechanical equipment, storage areas, and loading docks shall be fully screened from public view and, for buildings with only one street-facing frontage, are prohibited from being located along street-facing facades. They shall incorporate building materials and detailing compatible with the building being served and shall be co-located with driveways unless prohibited by the presence of a street tree, public infrastructure, or public facility within the right of way. Service uses may be located within the structure. (See Subsection 21A.37.050.K of this title.) J. Signage shall emphasize the pedestrian/mass transit orientation. 1. Define specific spaces for signage that are integral to building design, such as commercial sign bands framed by a material change, columns for blade signs, or other clearly articulated band on the face of the building. 2. Coordinate Signage locations with appropriate lighting, awnings, and other projections. 3. Coordinate sign location with landscaping to avoid conflicts. 120 K. Lighting shall support pedestrian comfort and safety, neighborhood image, and dark sky goals. 1. Provide street lights as indicated in the Salt Lake City Lighting Master Plan. 2. Outdoor lighting should be designed for low-level illumination and to minimize glare and light trespass onto adjacent properties and uplighting directly to the sky. 3. Coordinate lighting with architecture, signage, and pedestrian circulation to accentuate significant building features, improve sign legibility, and support pedestrian comfort and safety. L. Streetscape improvements shall be provided as follows: 1. One street tree chosen from the street tree list consistent with the city's urban forestry guidelines and,with the approval of the city's urban forester, shall be placed for every 30' of property frontage on a street. Existing street trees removed as the result of a development project shall be replaced by the developer with trees approved by the city's urban forester. 2. Hardscape (paving material) shall be utilized to differentiate privately-owned public spaces from public spaces. Hardscape for public sidewalks shall follow applicable design standards. Permitted materials for privately-owned public spaces shall meet the following standards: a. Use materials that are durable (withstand wear,pressure, damage), require a minimum of maintenance, and are easily repairable or replaceable should damage or defacement occur. b. Where practical, as in lower-traffic areas,use materials that allow rainwater to infiltrate into the ground and recharge the water table. c. Limit contribution to urban heat island effect by limiting use of dark materials and incorporating materials with a high Solar- Reflective Index (SRI). d. Utilize materials and designs that have an identifiable relationship to the character of the site, the neighborhood, or Salt Lake City. e. Use materials (like textured ground surfaces) and features (like ramps and seating at key resting points) to support access and comfort for people of all abilities. f. Asphalt shall be limited to vehicle drive aisles. 21A.59.060: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED APPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW: No design review approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year from the date of approval unless a building permit is issued or a complete building plans and building permit applications have been submitted to the Division of Building Services and Licensing. An extension of one year may be granted by the entity that approved the application. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the expiration of the design review approval. 121 21A.59.070: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW: A. The approval of a design review application shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, a building permit. B. Following the approval of a design review application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the approved design review application unless a modification is approved subject to the process outlined in this chapter. 21A.59.080: MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PLANS: A. Minor Modifications: The planning director may authorize minor modifications to approved design review applications as listed below. 1. Dimensional requirements that are necessary in order to comply with adopted building codes, fire codes, or engineering standards. The modification is limited to the minimum amount necessary to comply with the applicable building code, fire codes, or engineering standard. 2. Minor changes to building materials provided the modification is limited to the dimension of the material, color of material, or texture of material. Changes to a different material shall not be considered a minor modification. 3. Modifications other than those listed in Subsections 1 and 2 that comply with an applicable standard in this Title provided the standard was not subject to a requested modification as part of this process or any other process authorized by this title and does not conflict with a specific condition of approval or a finding associated with the approval. B. Other Modifications: Any other modifications not listed in Subsection A of this section shall be processed as follows: 1. If the proposed modification does not require a change to a condition of approval or a finding that was identified in a staff report or record of decision the matter may be reviewed by the planning commission, or in the case of administrative approvals, by the planning director, as a reconsideration of that specific modification subject to a public hearing for planning commission decisions or a notice of application for administrative approvals. 2. Any other modification shall require a new application and be subject to all required processes and standards. 122 SECTION 14. Amending the Text of Subsection 21A.27.050.D (Contingent on Adoption of the FB-UN3 District). That, if Subsection 21A.27.050.D of the Salt Lake City Code(Zoning: Form Based Districts: FB-UN1, FB-UN2, and FB-UN3 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District) is adopted by the date of the City Council adopting this ordinance, that subsection shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.27.050.D. FB-UN3 Building Form Standards: Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the FB-UN3 zone are listed in the below tables of this section. 1. Row House Building Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.D.1 Building Regulation for Building Form: Regulation Row House H Height Maximum of 40'. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Minimum 5'. Maximum 10',unless a greater setback is required due to Corner Side existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at Yard the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review Setback (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Minimum of 5' between row house building form and side property line, Yard except when an interior side yard is adjacent to a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30' or less, then the minimum shall be 10'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 5' between row house building form and rear property line, except when rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 30' or less, then the minimum is 20'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. U Uses Per Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. Story 123 GU Ground The required ground floor use space facing 900 South must be occupied Floor Use by a live/work space at least 25' in depth. Dimensions may be modified on 900 through Design Review(Chapter 21A.59). South E Entry Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See Table Feature 21A.27.030B for allowed entry features. Dwelling units adjacent to a street must include an entry feature on street facing fagade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.27.030.C.5,with minimum 5' width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building Stepback height of 30' or less, the first full floor of the building above 30' shall step back 10' from the building fagade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal Area to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 "Open Space Area."A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the Forms Per buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all Lot applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Dwelling units not located directly adjacent to a street are permitted, Orientation provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the fagade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s)per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject Walkway property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. DS Design See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable Standards building configuration and design standards. 124 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.D.2 Building Regulation for Building Forms: Regulation Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 125'. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 85' require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Minimum ground floor height 14'. Floor Height F Front and No minimum is required; however, doors are prohibited from opening Corner into the public right of way. Maximum 10' unless a greater setback is Side Yard required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum Setback setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 5' of the Build-To front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is adjacent to a Side Yard zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30' or less, then the minimum shall be 10'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 30' or less, then the minimum is 20'. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10' in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. GU Ground The required ground floor use space facing 900 South shall be limited to Floor Use the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service on 900 establishments, public service portions of businesses,restaurants, South taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. E Ground Ground floor dwelling units adjacent to a street must have an allowed Floor entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030B for allowed entry features. Dwelling Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.27.030.C.5, are required to Entrances each required entry feature. 125 U Upper When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building Level height of 30' or less, the first full floor of the building above 30' shall step Stepback back 10' from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. M Midblock If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject W Walkway property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10' wide and include a minimum 6' wide unobstructed path. BF Building Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the Forms Per buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all Lot applicable standards. OS Open A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include Space vegetation. Vegetation LB Loading Maximum of one (1) loading bay on a front facade per street face, subject Bay to all dimensional requirements in Section 21A.44.070. Loading bay entry width limited to 14' and must be screened by garage door. One loading bay driveway is allowed in addition to any other driveway allowances. DS Design See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building Standards configuration and design standards. SECTION 15. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on 126 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Bill No. of 2023. Salt Lake City Attomey's Office Date: De emb r 21, 2022 By: Pa 1 C. ielso Senior City Attorney 127 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Clean Ordinance 5. Public Comment Received After Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 6. Proposed Graphic Changes 7. Proposed Amendments to Off-Street Parking 8. Mailing List 1) PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00529 December 10, 2020 Salt Lake City Corporation applies for a Transportation and Land Use Connection Grant from Wasatch Front Regional Council. March 15, 2021 Salt Lake City awarded the Transportation and Land Use Connection Grant. October 15, 2021 Design Workshop tours SLC November 30, 2021 Design Workshop and SLC Planning Division held a stakeholder meeting with the local development community. December 1, 2021 Design Workshop and SLC Planning Division held a stakeholder meeting with the Neighborhood Councils and Downtown Development Committee. December 2, 2021 Design Workshop and the SLC Planning Division held a stakeholder meeting with an ADA community representative group. January 17, 2022 A public visual preference survey was advertised on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. January 19, 2022 Design Workshop held a stakeholder meeting with the Downtown Alliance. May 9, 2022 The proposed code changes were posted to the Planning Division's Online Open House webpage. May 13, 2022 An informational postcard was mailed to approximately 1,700 property owners within the study area informing them of the study and providing them with a QR code to obtain more information. June 1, 2022 The Planning Division presented an update to the Downtown Development Committee. June 8, 2022 Design Workshop briefs Salt Lake City Planning Commission August 24, 2022 Planning Commission forwards a positive recommendation to City Council 2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-00529—A petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Code for the Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1, D-2,D-3,D-4, CG,FBUN1, and FBUN2. Additionally,the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures,while developing standards for public spaces. Changes seek to have a positive impact on human-scale orientation,pedestrian accessibility, and community character. The City Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. DATE: Date#1 and Date#2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter. his meeting will be held via electronic means,while potentially also providing for an in person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building,located at 451 South State Street,Room 326, Salt Labe City, Utah. If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting, please visit the website www.sle.gov/council/virtual-meetings/ or call 801-535-7654 to obtain connection information. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com.All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Kelsey Lindquist at 385-226-7227 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail Kelse. .l�quistkslcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535- 7600,or relay service 711. 3) ORIGINAL PETITION 41 N.Rio Grande Street,Suite 103 .''j Salt Lake City,UT 84101 � \ ll^ (801)363-4250 www.wfrc.org WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL Jeff Silvestrini,Chair Mayor,Millcreek Jeff Scott,Vice Chair Commissioner,Box Elder County Mark Allen Mayor,Washington Terrace March 15, 2021 Len Arave Dear Salt Lake City: Mayor,North Salt Lake Ron Bigelow Mayor,West Valley The Transportation and Land Use Connection program partners would like to thank you for Mike Caldwell your participation in the program, and we are pleased to inform you that your project will be Mayor,Ogden Robert Dahle receiving funding in the 2021 award year. Mayor,Holladay Jim Harvey Commissioner,Weber County Scoff Jenkins The Downtown Building Height and Public/Ped Space Code Update project will receive an Commissioner,Weber County award of $102,500 contingent upon a local match of $7,500, for a total project budget of Randy Lewis Mayor,Bountiful $110,000. The next step in the process is to sign a Letter of Concurrence, which will be sent Erin Mendenhall Mayor,Salt Lake City to you by your WFRC project manager, who will be assigned in the coming weeks. An invoice Mike Newton Councilmember,Morgan County for the local match will also be sent. Prior to being assigned a project manager, please let me Mark Shepherd know if you have an questions. Mayor,Clearfield Y y Bob Stevenson Commissioner,Davis County Derk Timothy Your project manager will guide you through the process of completing this important effort; Mayor,Bluffdale Troy walker you can become familiar with the next steps here. We hope this award fills a need for your Mayor,Draper Scott Wardle community, and we look forward to seeing this project through to success. Councilmember,Tooele County Jenny Wilson Mayor,Salt Lake County Congratulations, Aimee Winder-Newton Councilmember,Salt Lake County Senator Wayne Harper Utah State Senate Representative Mike Schultz Utah House of Representatives Carlton Christensen Utah Transit Authority Carlos Braceras Megan Townsend Utah Department of Transportation Community and Economic Development Director Dawn Ramsey Wasatch Front Regional Council Utah League of Cities&Towns (801)404-8925 Lorene Kamalu Utah Association of Counties An Bruening //,SALT LAKE Envision Utah °t .✓ m '� i COUNTY Evan Curtis [DI"e; WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT State Planning Coordinator Ai TRANSPORTATION Andrew Gruber AND U T A Executive Director LAND USE CONNECTION \ udot.atah.gov 4) PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER PLANNING COMMISSIONS STAFF REPORT PUBLISHED UTA UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 West 2h Salt Lake Cityy,,LIT UT 84101 August 24, 2022 c/o Aubrey Clark,Administrative Secretary Salt Lake City Planning Commission 451 State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 RE:Downtown Building Heights&Street Activation Text Amendment Dear Planning Commissioners, The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) is intensely interested in Salt Lake City's effort to assess potential height increases in its downtown zones and would encourage maximizing development potential within the station area,particularly on the parcels immediately adjacent to Salt Lake Central Station. UTA, in collaboration with the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency (SLC-RDA), is preparing for the redevelopment of a significant amount of property around North Temple and Salt Lake Central Stations. The concept for Central Station envisions a substantial, mixed-use structure, opposite the Historic Rio Grande Depot, bookending the city's planned 300 South festival street. It will include significant improvements to pedestrian and passenger amenities, providing a drastically improved transit gateway experience to the city. It will also include space for UTA's relocated headquarters, replacing its current building,which is aging and in poor seismic condition. Moving UTA's administrative functions to Salt Lake Central will build on the development activity along 200 South and the Salt Lake City RDA's plans for properties within the Depot District. Salt Lake Central and the Depot District are at the intersection of the most transit-connected location in the state. To maximize this opportunity, UTA will explore providing additional space beyond its own needs. UTA plans to construct as many additional floors as the city will allow and the market will support. This would capitalize on the transit investments the city and state have made in the neighborhood by encouraging more ridership and decreasing the impact of single occupancy commuter trips into the downtown core. The proposed code changes before the Planning Commission,affecting building heights in the Gateway Mixed Use District, are a positive step in the right direction. However, UTA is concerned that artificially limiting heights near the station will unduly restrain the potential of Salt Lake Central and surrounding development. UTA requests the Planning Commission consider further increasing height allowances, or eliminating height limitations altogether, in this critical location for commercial mixed uses and office before advancing this proposal to City Council. We recognize that the city may desire to retain control, through design review or other means, but feel the benefit to the city and value of increased land use intensity around this regionally significant transit hub warrant additional consideration. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, V Carlton J. Christensen Chair of the Board of Trustees ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001:2004 1-888-RIDE-UTA www.rideuto.com /,r 5) PROPOSED GRAPHIC CHANGES Graphic 5 I- U C p W aOQ o L] _ ARM 15' -20' Mid Block wallcways 1 The nildblock walkway must be a minimum of fifteen (1 I;) feet and a maximum of twenty ( 0) feet wide, unless otherwise approved, and include a min[mum six ( ) foot wide unobstructed path. 5 Graphic 2 T C23 Parking Setbacks I Surface parking lots shall be located behind the primary structure. 2 I 1 I I 108, i I I � 1 I I 1 1 so' I I 1 # 15'Setback• , 20%of the— ; Building Facade ._# � ,...._.. 20% of the Building Facade PPP --.--,. . .........., lo' Setback 21 .37.050. .1,Upper Floor Step Back 1 A minlmum step back of ten feet (10')for buildings sixty feet (60 to eighty(so'). Twenty percent (20%) of the building facade cast meet the street at the iot line with no step back. 2 A minimum step back of fifteen feet(15')from the property line after the first two (2)to five(5) floors for bttilclings above eighty feet (go') tall.Twenty percent (20%) of the building facade can ineet the street at the lot line with no step back. 12 6) MAILING LIST Item 132 h MOTION SHEET �•••� ����- / �',�� CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 ii TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards Budget Analysts DATE: May 2,2023 RE: Budget Amendment Number Sian FY2023 MOTION i—CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 2—CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. MOTION 3—CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT ITEMS I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2023 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are listed for reference. A-i:Additional Funding for the Cultural Core($291,000 from Salt Lake City's Cultural Core Surplus Fund) A-2:Additional One-time Funding for Advantage Services'Mobile Clean Team($300,000 from Rescope of CAN Personnel Vacancy Savings) A-3: Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for New Homeless Services($73,418 from Recaptured Operations Rio Grande Funds) A-4: Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain Rescope Change($823,548 from CIP) A-5: Open Space Property Acquisition(City Parks)AND A-6:Open Space Property Acquisition(Trails) A-6: Open Space Property Acquisition(Trails)($300,000 from Impact Fees) A-7: Recapture One-time Emergency Solutions Grant CARES Act Funds($209,552 Rescope from $200,000 of City Administration and$9,552 from VOA's Homeless Outreach Program) A-8: Steiner Aquatics Center Roof Replacement($I.38 million from General Fund Balance) CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 A-9:Natural Gas Cost Increase($635,000 from General Fund Balance of which$135,000 to the Fleet Fund) A-1o: Ranked Choice Voting Awareness Materials($35,000 from General Fund Balance) A-11: Environmental Assessment Additional Funding($50,00o from General Fund Balance) A-12: Impact Fee Plan Consultant Contract Amendment($27,000 Total; $9,000 Each from Fire,Parks, and Police Impact Fees) A-13: Flood Mitigation($1 Million Total; $736,275 from General Fund Balance and Recapturing $263,725 of Unused NBA Allstar Game Activation Funding) A-14:Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement($18,603,o8o from ARPA) A-15:ARPA Funding to Perpetual Housing Fund D-1: State Mitigation Grant to Advantage Services for Mobile Clean Team($16o,000 from Three Prior Awards) D-2: Fire Department—Other Reimbursements($17,118 from General Fund) D-3: Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land Fund—Land Purchase near RAC($395,442 from Parks Impact Fees) D-4: Fire Impact Fee—Fee payment for Excess Capacity($2.2 million of Fire Impact Fees of which$1.7 million to the CIP Fund and$500,000 to the General Fund) D-5: Fire Training Center($499,533 from General Fund to CIP Fund) D-6: Fisher Mansion Carriage House Impact Fee Reimbursement($1oo,000 from Parks Impact Fees to CIP Cost Overrun Account) D-7: Recapture of Police Precinct Funds to Surplus($129,688 from CIP Fund to Surplus Land Fund) D-8: Police Impact Fee—Unclaimed Refunds($237,6o6 from Impact Fees to Police Impact Fees) D-9: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP($25,000 from General Fund to Fleet Fund) D-1o: Difference Between$4.3 Million Grant Adopted in Budget Amendment No.5 and the Actual $4.22 Million) ($78,56o from Misc.Grants) E-1: School-Age Quality 22 Grant(FY22-25) ($78o,000 from Misc.Grants(Funding and Award Title Correction) E-2: School-Age Quality Summer Expansion FY22-23($373,338 from Misc.Grants)(Correction) E-3: State Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY2023 Revision($16o,000 Rescope for Advantages Services from A Prior Award) G-1: U.S.Department of Homeland Security,FEMA—Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program ($115,472 from Misc.Grants) MOTION 4—CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND NOT ADOPT I move that the Council close the public hearing and proceed to the next agenda item. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT �.• ���� l��j/ �.�� CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY = tinyurl.com/SLCFY2R TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: FROM: Ben Luedtke Sylvia Richards Set Date:April 18,2023 Y rt Briefing:May 2,2023 Budget and Policy Analysts Public Hearing:May 2,2023 end Briefing: If needed,TBD,2023 DATE: May 2, 2023 Potential Action:May 19 or June 6,2023 RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY2o23 Budget Amendment Number Six includes twenty-nine proposed amendments,$50,160,062 of expenditures of which$11.7 million is from General Fund Balance,requesting changes to seven funds.If all the items are adopted as proposed,then Fund Balance would be 23.7%which is$45,722,779 above the 13%minimum target. The Administration is requesting a straw poll for items A-2 Advantage Services'mobile clean team and A-11 additional funding for environmental assessments and remediation which is mostly to facilitate the tiny home village at the former Redwood Road landfill site. This is expected to be the last General Fund budget amendment of the current fiscal year. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 O Council Request:Tracking New Ongoing General Fund Costs Approved in Midyear Budget Amendments Council staff has provided the following list of new ongoing costs to the General Fund.Many of these are new FTE's approved during this fiscal year's budget amendments,noting that each new FTE increases the City's annual budget if positions are added to the staffing document. Budget I Estimated Cost Amendment Item Increase to Next New City FTEs Notes Annual Budget Homeless Shelter Cities 13 new FTEs which Admin expects to apply for grant funding annually Mitigation Grant Award includes: to cover these costs.General Fund would not need #1 $2.2 Million 12 police officers and to cover costs if the State grant is awarded to the one business and City to fully cover the costs. community liaison Utah League of Cities N/A Total annual membership cost is$221,563 #3 and Town Membership $38,000 Cost Increase Two Contract Two new FTEs Development $207,800 Specialists in Finance Senior Project Manager One new FTE The$85 Million Parks Bond could pay for this FTE in Public Services $168,000 in future fiscal years.The General Fund fronted the cost in FY2023.The position sunsets with the bond funding. Two Planners in Public Two new FTEs The$85 Million Parks Bond could pay for these Lands FTEs in future fiscal years.The General Fund #4 $�41,440 fronted the cost in FY2023.The positions sunset with the bond funding. Volunteers of America N/A Separate from VOA's countywide outreach team. (VOA)Salt Lake City $274,000 Specific Outreach Team Four existing VOA workers: Two case managers and two coordinators Police Substation on N/A North Temple and Downtown Central $130,000 Precinct Leases and Utilities One-time Retention $1,201,976 N/A Bonuses and Ongoing #5 Hiring Bonuses for Police Officers Know Your Neighbor $61,000 One new Part-time Grant Employee Budget Estimated Cost Amendment Item Increase to Next New City FTEs Notes Annual Budget of the new FTEs sunset with the GO Bond funding, TOTALS $4,522,2i6 19 and some are covered with potential future state rant awards Disclaimer:For the chart above,staff didn't include a couple of Youth&Family and Police Department multi-year grants since they would not create cost increases for the next annual budget. Page 13 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2022-23 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2023. Amended Variance FY22-FY23 Annual FY22-23 Amended Favorable Revenue Budget Budget Revised Forecast (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 - Sale and Use Taxes 105,050,018 105,050,018 110,811,754 5,761,736 Franchise Taxes 11,657,128 11,657,128 12,020,987 363,859 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,638,222 - TotalTaxes 243,358,295 243,358,295 249,483,890 6,125,595 Licenses and Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 39,033,583 (1,702,531) Intergovernmental Revenue 41644,622 4,644,622 4,892,377 247,755 Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 7,500,000 5,428,846 Fines 3,765,174 3,765,174 3,459,141 (306,033) Parking Meter Collections 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 - Charges,Fees,and Rentals 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,879,854 447,060 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,438,710 3,438,710 3,959,921 521,211 Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,234,739 (196,978) Transfers 28,821,993 34,910,408 34,848,950 (61,458 Total W/O Special Tax 358,336,048 364,424,463 374,927,930 10,503,467 Additional Sales Tax(1/2%) 44,364,490 44,364,490 51,035,000 6,670,510 Total General Fund 1 402,700,538 1 408,788,953 425,962,930 17,173,977 According to the Administration, the current projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive. Sales tax is currently projected to exceed budget by $5.7 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our Future is projected to exceed budget by $6.8 million. Building permits have slowed and are currently showing a decrease, those losses are slightly offset by small gains in airport parking tax and innkeepers tax, but still show a lost compared to the budget of$1.7 million. Due to the rise interest rates, interest income shows a large positive variance to budget of$5.4 million. Charges and services and miscellaneous revenue are both trending above budget. In total current revenue projections are above amended budget by $17.1 million. FY2 FY2023 Budget FOF TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL • 12,114,190 16,285,970 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 .- -. . :. . (2,879,483) (15,335,33 18,214,817 (2,100,608) (20,736,262) (22,836,870) • , 79,654)ml6L(10,259,789) (12,139,443) (3,162,300) (17,260,909) (20,423,209) • ;- , ;. 55,053 78,576,657 85,931,710 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 3396 21.30% 29.60%; 27.04% 27309,o - (7,535,897) (7,535,897) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) - - 71,040,760 78,395,813 13,132,752 95,174,631 108,307,383 20.19%: 19,4396 29.60%I 24.81% 25.30910 •- , 5,138,235 5,138,235 (475,000); (475,000) • 490,847 490,847 •- , (986,298) (986,298) • 6,000,000 6,000,000 (1,000,000); (2,000,000) (6,538,000); (6,538,000) • 1,508,044 ; 1,508,044 194,600 194,600 •- , (4,242,779); (4,242,779) (7,584,328); (7,584,328) • 400,000 400,000 •- , (400,000) (400,000) (5,940,349) (5,940,349) • 19,120,198 19,120,198 •- , (1,553,938): (1,553,938) (11,719,731): (11,719,731) • (794,641): (794,641) •- , (1,200,000) (10,843,298) (12,043,298) 11,139,999 23,083,587 34,223,586 - 2,100,608 12,134,899 14,235,507 • M -8,395,660 93,975,418 112,371,078 13,132,752 '1 88,232,021 101,364,773 35.7291b 26.70910 27.86% 29.6091b 23.00% 23.68% •, ,, • 51,499,136 351,910,770 403,409,90.MM4,364,490 383,650,846 428,015,336 The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $28,058,542.11 of revenue and expense of$50,160,062. The amendment proposes changes in seven funds,with no increases in FTEs. The amendment also includes the use of$11.7 million from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes twenty-nine initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing Impact Fees Update The Administration's transmittal does not provide an updated summary of impact fee tracking.The information is current as of 3/24/23.As a result,the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all of FY2024 and FY2025.Note that item A-12 in this budget amendment is requesting$27,000 to update the fire,parks,and police sections of the City's impact fee plan.The transportation section was updated in October 2020. Type Unallocated Cash Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring "Available to Spend" Impact Fees Fire $1,725,882 More than a year away - Parks $15,534,954 More than a year away - Police $1,o61,156 More than a year away - Transportation $5,248,024 More than a year away - Note:Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Section A: New Items (Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report,staff has included the Administration's descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-i:Additional Funding for the Cultural Core($291,000 from Salt Lake City's Cultural Core Surplus Fund) The Administration is proposing to use all the Cultural Core Surplus Fund spread over six years in addition to the $250,000 the City currently contributes annually.The current balance of the Surplus Fund is$291,000.An additional $5o,000 annually would be provided for five years.If approved,then the total annual contribution from the City would be$300,000 for five years.In the sixth year$41,000 would be provided.In the seventh year the City's total annual contribution would revert to$250,000. Salt Lake County also contributes$250,000 annually to the Cultural Core.The County Council has approved an additional$50,000 annual contribution for six years from their Cultural Core Surplus Fund.The current balance of the County's Surplus Fund is$309,000.In the seventh year no additional funding would be provided;the County's total annual contribution would revert to$250,000. Appropriations not spent in prior years lapsed to the Cultural Core Surplus Funds.The City and County each have separate Cultural Core Surplus Funds.The additional annual funding from the City and County are being requested to address cost increases for continuing to provide existing levels of service.The$500,000 combined annual contribution from the City and County has not increased since the Cultural Core program began six years ago.If this item is approved,then as shown in the table below the total combined annual funding for the Cultural Core would be $600,000 for five years,then$591,000 in the sixth year,and revert to$500,000 in the seventh year.The Cultural Core Action Plan Implementation Contract would be amended to reflect these additional funds. Funding Source Year 1 Yawn Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year City's Annual Contribution $250,000 S250,000 $250,000 S250,000 $250,000 S250,000 $250,000 City's Additional Contribution $ 50,000 S 50,000 $ 50,000 S 50,000 $ 50,000 S 41,000 $ - County's Annual Contribution S250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 S250,000 $250,000 County's Additional Contribution S 5o,000 $ 5o,000 $ .5o,000l S 501000 $ 50,000 S 50,000 $ - AWiUALTOTALS I $600,000l $600,000l $600,000l S600,000l $600,000l $591,000 $500,000 Policy Question: ➢ Retain Some Funding for Unexpected Costs-The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the Cultural Core Surplus Fund should retain a positive balance to address unexpected expenses like a rainy day fund. A-2:Additional One-time Funding for Advantage Services'Mobile Clean Team($300,000 from Rescope of CAN Personnel Vacancy Savings) Note that items A-2,A-3,D-1,and E-3 are all related to increasing funding for the contract between Advantage Services and the City through the end of FY2o23. The write-up below addresses all three items. The Administration is requesting a total one-time increase of$533,418 to continue existing mobile clean team functions provided by Advantage Services through a contract with the City.Without additional funding,the services would be paused until funding becomes available next fiscal year.The funding request is split into three parts in this budget amendment as shown below.The three funding requests are all from one-time funds.The FY2024 annual budget would need new ongoing funding as an increase to the program's base budget to continue providing existing levels of service. - $300,000 from rescoping projected personnel vacancy savings in CAN(item A-2) o Note that vacancy savings are one-time funds because the positions may be filled next fiscal year - $16o,000 from rescoping part of the State Mitigation Grant(item E-3) o Note that this proposed$16o,000 rescoping comes from three subawards for staffing listed below.All of the unspent funds must be returned to the State if not used by the end of the fiscal year.The$16o,000 was unused earlier in the fiscal year due to vacancies. ■ $6o,000 from Housing Stability Division ■ $50,000 from Salt Lake City Police Department ■ $50,000 from Volunteers of America - $73,418 from rescoping unspent funds from Operation Rio Grande(item A-3) o Note that the Council approved a rescope of these Operation Rio Grande funds in December as part of Budget Amendment#4.The Road Home used$104,429 for the St.Vincent de Paul overflow program.This left the$73,418 unable to be used as the program ended with warmer temperatures. The base budget for Advantage Services is$802,000 in the Community&Neighborhoods Department(CAN)which all comes from the General Fund.The base budget has remained unchanged for the past two fiscal years.Over the same time,the mobile clean team has expanded from a focus in the Rio Grande neighborhood to new areas in the City. Services include cleanup of abandoned camp materials,voluntary trash removal from active encampments,and biowaste removal.The mobile clean team works with the City's Rapid Intervention Team. Services are provided on public property except for biowaste removal which is available on private property.In limited circumstances trash removal is also provided on private property. A one-time award of$76o,110 in FY2021 was used to pay for service level expansion over the past two fiscal years. Those funds have been expended.The mobile clean team continued to provide an expanded level of service after the existing base budget and one-time funding were spent.This resulted in costs being incurred which exceeded the available budget. The Council has approved$278,943 of CDBG Public Services funding to Advantage Services from FY2o18 to FY2023 for the supportive employment program.They did not apply for CDBG funding in FY2024. The Administration has requested a straw poll on these items. Policy Questions: ➢ Preventing Expenses Being Incurred Beyond Budget in the Future—The Council may wish to ask the Administration what has or could change to prevent a similar situation from happening when costs are incurred that exceed the approved budget. ➢ Metrics—Would the Council like additional information about metrics for the mobile clean team?The Administration reports 1,195 requests have been completed by the mobile clean team this fiscal year and average case closure times were four days in March. A-3: Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for New Homeless Services 073418 from Recaptured Operations Rio Grande Funds) Note that items A-2,A-3,D-1,and E-3 are all related to increasing funding for the contract between Advantage Services and the City through the end of PY2o23.See the A-2 write-up for more. This request is to reappropriate$73,418 of unspent Operation Rio Grande funds.The funds were unused during the original operation.Then the Council approved a$177,874 rescope request for St.Vincent de Paul winter overflow program. $104,429 was used.This second rescope of the remaining$73,418 is for mobile clean team services. A-4: Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain Rescope Change($823,548 from CIP) In FY2020,the Council approved$857,968 in CIP to redevelop the Seven Canyons Fountain located in Liberty Park. The fountain was built in 1993 and closed in 2017 in response to health and safety code issues identified by the Salt Lake County Health Department.The CIP project was meant to address the code issues and reopen the fountain.The Administration is requesting to rescope the remaining funding to modify the fountain into a permanent dry artwork. The City Arts Council would be involved in the conceptual design selection.The dry artwork is expected to include specialty concrete and finishes for the seven symbolic creeks flowing into the Jordan River,landscaping and lighting improvements,new signage,and handrails.The Public Lands Department consulted with some of the original artists about the conversion to a dry artwork. After an initial feasibility study,the Public Lands Department determined that re-opening the fountain as an interactive water feature would require significantly greater capital costs and projected water use.Two alternate options were explored: adapting the fountain into a dry artwork or decommissioning it. Public feedback including a community survey in 2021 showed support for creating a dry artwork instead of the decommissioning option.The responses indicated that conserving water,preserving art,and staying within the existing budget were key factors to consider between the two presented options. A second feasibility study was conducted by the Public Lands Department and Engineering to evaluate options to add some water back to the fountain at lower volumes.The options had a total cost estimate of$2.1 million to$4 million plus ongoing water and maintenance costs. A-5: Open Space Property Acquisition(City Parks)AND A-6: Open Space Property Acquisition(Trails) Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of$450,000 utilizing Parks Impact Fees to acquire an available parcel of property.This funding request includes all fees associated with acquisition.Any remaining funding from the acquisition would be utilized for immediate remediation needs and addressing potential safety concerns. A-6:Open Space Property Acquisition(Trails)($300,000 from Impact Fees) Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment for$300,000 utilizing Parks Impact Fees to provide a 24%matching contribution to$1,250,000 committed from the State of Utah Department of Outdoor Recreation and in partnership with Utah Open Lands.The combined funding would be used to acquire several acres of open space property located in Salt Lake City to facilitate construction of a trailhead.This funding request includes all fees associated with acquisition as well concept design for the proposed trailhead.Utah Open Land will also be conducting a fundraising campaign to cover a portion of the acquisition.Any remaining funding would be utilized for immediate trailhead design and construction needs and addressing potential safety concerns. A-7: Recapture One-time Emergency Solutions Grant CARES Act Funds($209,552 Rescope from $2oo,000 of City Administration and$9,552 from VOXs Homeless Outreach Program) The Administration is requesting to recapture unused funds previously allocated for costs to the City for administering the program and$9,552 from VOA's Homeless Outreach Program.The deadline to spend the funds was extended by one year to September 30,2023.The funds are proposed to be allocated to Utah Community Action's Homeless Prevention Program.It provides emergency rental assistance,funding for case managers,and support to individuals and households.The Council originally awarded the program$1,212,940.Utah Community Action indicates a need for emergency rental assistance still exists for some City residents and they expect to be able to fully spend the funds by the deadline. Other community service providers that received some of the Emergency Solutions Grant CARES Act funding are on track to use their remaining awards(e.g.,The Road Home rapid rehousing),would not be able to use the funds by the deadline(e.g.,Utah Community Action rapid rehousing,or the eligible pandemic-related program has ended(e.g., winter overflow shelter).One organization,Soap to Hope,providing street outreach has fully spent their award and has not indicated whether additional funding could be used by the deadline.Recapturing funding and awarding it to another organization that received funding does not require the City to go through the substantial amendment process to change the annual action plan. As part of the CARES Act,Salt Lake City was awarded$7,138,203 in U.S.Housing and Urban Development or HUD Department grants for projects and programs directly related to responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.The CARES Act HUD grants are subject to separate regulations than the regular annual awards.On February 16,2021,the Council approved the funding awards. Policy Question: )0- Soap to Hope Street Outreach Possibly Use Additional Funding—The Council may wish to ask the Administration to check whether Soap to Hope's street outreach program could use some of the recaptured funding by the spending deadline.The program was originally awarded$214,654 which has all been spent. A-8: Steiner Aquatics Center Roof Replacement($1.38 million from General Fund Balance) The Steiner Aquatics Center roof was installed in 2000.A recent inspection determined that the roof needs to be replaced.This request is for half of the total project cost because the City and Salt Lake County have an agreement to split the cost of capital repairs and replacements of the building's systems.The project is expected to begin this summer and be completed by the fall. The Public Services Department maintains a Facilities Condition Index for city buildings that accounts for maintenance,repairs,and replacement.In addition to the roof,the index identified approximately$3 million of assets beyond useful life at the Steiner Aquatics Center.Some of the assets include the locker rooms,pool resurfacing,and the parking lot. Policy Question: ➢ Planning for Capital Replacement Needs at Steiner Aquatics Center—The Council may wish to ask the Administration what planning is being done for the$3 million of capital replacement needs at the Steiner Aquatics Center and how those projects would be prioritized. A-9:Natural Gas Cost Increase($635,000 from General Fund Balance of which$135,000 to the Fleet Fund) The City experienced significant cost increases for natural gas over the winter.The base budget for wholesale natural gas serving the City's larger facilities is$565,635.The increase would bring the total funding for FY2023 to$1,2oo,635 or a 112%increase.This request is for one-time funding to address the current fiscal year natural gas price spikes. Ongoing funding would be needed in the FY2024 annual budget assuming natural gas prices remain high.The largest price spike was a six-fold increase in the cost of natural gas for January from an average of$7 per decatherm(a measure of heat energy)to$49.Prices have since decreased but remain higher than historical averages. The City uses Dominion Energy to supply natural gas to most facilities.The City uses a wholesale natural gas contract through the State for the largest facilities which historically has saved taxpayers funding by accessing lower prices. Over the recent winter the wholesale vendor passed along price spikes to customers resulting in large cost increases. The Public Services Department is evaluating options to lock in prices to avoid similar unexpectedly large cost increases at short notice. The City has made several capital improvements in recent years to reduce the use of natural gas such as replacing the steam boilers in the Central Plant which serves the Main Library,City Hall,and The Leonardo,HVAC upgrades at the Public Lands Building,and replacing the Steiner Aquatics Center pool boilers. A-1o: Ranked Choice Voting Awareness Materials($35,000 from General Fund Balance) It has been confirmed there will be no state funding available for awareness of Ranked Choice Voting this election.Any awareness materials must be funded by the City. For fiscal year 22-23,the Recorder's office is requesting$35,000 to cover awareness materials and an additional$40,00o in the FY 23-24 proposal provided the expenses will be incurred. between July and October.Awareness for this fiscal year shall include brochures,large QR posters,stickers,vinyl banners for tabling,candy for tabling,translation services,scripts for PSA,graphic design subscription for the creation of awareness materials,radio ads,billboards,and more.The Council selected ranked choice voting without a primary for the municipal election this year.The General Election will be held on Tuesday,November 7.This year elections are being held for City Council districts two,four,six,and the mayoral race. A-ii: Environmental Assessment Additional Funding($5O,000 from General Fund Balance) The Sustainability Department is requesting$50,000 to continue environmental assessments at the former Redwood Road landfill site where a tiny home village is planned.The funds would be used to cover consulting work to finalize a Remedial Action Plan which must be approved by the State Department of Environmental Quality or DEQ. Remediation work could then begin during construction through oversight,sampling,design,and reporting.Some of the funds may also be used for environmental issues at the Fleet Block. The FY2023 annual budget included a new line item in Non-departmental of$1oo,000 for consultant services to assess environmental issues on City property.The Administration reports $95,600 was spent for work related to the DEQ's voluntary cleanup program at the future site of The Other Side Village,and$1,434 was spent on developing community garden environmental standards and procedures.The remaining available balance is $2,966.The ground lease agreement between the City and The Other Side Academy requires reimbursement for the environmental assessments, planning,and remediation work.The City is fronting these costs and may be reimbursed later. The Administration has requested a straw poll on this item. A-12: Impact Fee Plan Consultant Contract Amendment($27,00o Total; $9,00o Each from Fire, Parks, and Police Impact Fees) The Finance Department is requesting$9,00o from Parks&Public Land Impact Fees, $9,00o from Fire Impact Fees, and$9,00o from Police Impact Fees to fund an amendment to the Impact Fee Facilities Plan(IFFP)consultant contract.The department will work with the consultants to complete updates to the IFFPs and Impact Fee Analysis. The Administration anticipated transmitting recommended updates to the Council for the fire and police sections of the City's Impact Fees Plan in FY2024.An update to the parks section is expected to be transmitted later depending on work developing a five-year strategic plan.In October 2020,the Council approved an update to the transportation section. A-13: Flood Mitigation($i Million Total; $736,275 from General Fund Balance and Recapturing $263,725 of Unused NBA Allstar Game Activation Funding) Salt Lake City Administration and Emergency Management requests funds to be used for sandbagging,diversion walls, and Joint Hazard Analysis Teams will also be used in the event there is wide scale flooding.The$263,725 is funding remaining from the NBA Allstar Game activation funding that is being proposed to be redirected toward flood mitigation purposes.After the transmittal was received the Administration requested this item be increased from $500,000 to$1 million based on costs incurred related to Emigration Creek flooding. A-14:Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement($18,603,080 from ARPA) The Administration is requesting the Council approve using additional ARPA funding for revenue replacement.This would almost maximize the allowable revenue replacement in the General Fund based on U.S.Treasury guidance.This approach also helps reduce the administrative workload to monitor,document,and report compliance to the federal government.Some items previously identified as being funded from ARPA would instead receive General Fund dollars and some of the revenue replacement would be available to use in FY2024.These items include: - $10 million would lapse to General Fund Balance at the end of FY2023 to be used in FY2024 - $4 million would be transferred to the RDA for the Westside Communities Initiative - $2 million would be transferred to Public Utilities'Storm Water Fund for local matching funds to a state grant for the new water reclamation facility - $2 million would be used for the local nonprofit assistance grants to be administered through the Housing Stability Division - $500,000 would be transferred to CIP for annex building renovations which is leased by Odyssey House for a substance abuse treatment program serving single fathers - $103,o8o would be used for Rapid Intervention Team equipment If this item is approved,then nearly all the City's fiscal recovery funding from ARPA would be budgeted.The deadline to obligate funds is the end of calendar year 2024 under current U.S.Treasury guidance. A-15:ARPA Funding to Perpetual Housing Fund Utah Investment proposal Staff Note:see separate staff report for additional information on this proposal which is also scheduled to have a separate briefing.Mayor Mendenhall is requesting that the City Council approve a$io million budget amendment to be distributed to a non-profit development organization named the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah,LLC(PHF)for affordable housing development and wealth building opportunities for PHF project residents.Additionally,the Administration is seeking feedback on the pre-funding conditions the Administration is proposing to PHF for this allocation.For additional information on this proposal see Attachment#1. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section(None) Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section(None) Section D: Housekeeping D-jL: State Mitigation Grant to Advantage Services for Mobile Clean Team($16o,000 from Three Prior Awards) Note that items A-2,A-3,D-1,and E-3 are all related to increasing funding for the contract between Advantage Services and the City through the end of FY2o23.See the A-2 write-up for more. This request is to rescope$16o,000 for the mobile clean team provided by Advantage Services.The funding is from three subawards for staffing: $60,00o from Housing Stability Division, $50,000 from Salt Lake City Police Department,and$50,000 from Volunteers of America.All the unspent funds must be returned to the State if not used by the end of the fiscal year.The$16o,000 was unused earlier in the fiscal year due to vacancies.Note the budget amendment would keep$iio,000 within the existing cost center but for a new use and$50,000 would be moved from a Police Department cost center to CAN'S existing professional services cost center which is item E-3 below. D-2: Fire Department—Other Reimbursements($17,118 from General Fund) The Fire Department has provided several services in which it expects to receive a reimbursement including:training backfill costs incurred on behalf of Utah Search and Rescue(USAR),and Fire Investigation overtime incurred on behalf of the Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms,and Explosives(ATF). Utah Search and Rescue(USAR)Training/Backfill $8,820.33 Camp Williams Exercises,K9 Training,Tech Search Specialist Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms,and Explosives(ATF) $8,297.39 Sugarhouse Fire Investigation/Overtime Total Reimbursement $17,117.72 D-3: Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land Fund—Land Purchase near RAC($395,442 from Parks Impact Fees) Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to reimburse the Surplus Land Fund using Parks Impact Fees for a previous year property acquisition.In 2019,the Council approved$500,000 of Surplus Land Funds to be used to fund the purchase of two parcels near the Regional Athletic Complex or RAC(Rose Park Lane)references BA3 FY19 A-1.The actual cost of the acquisition came in at$395,441.70.Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to transfer $395,442 from Parks Impact Fees to a new impact fee cost center to reimburse the actual cost of the land and to recapture the original$5oo,000 appropriation back to the Surplus Land account. Note that item D-7 would also increase the Surplus Land Fund balance.At the time of publishing this staff report,the current balance of the Surplus Land Fund was being confirmed. D-4: Fire Impact Fee—Fee payment for Excess Capacity($2.2 million of Fire Impact Fees of which$1.7 million to the CIP Fund and$500,000 to the General Fund) The Administration is requesting a budget of$2.2 million from fire impact fees as reimbursement to the General Fund for past investments in facilities eligible for but not funding from fire impact fees.The City's Impact Fee Plan calls these an"existing facilities buy-in"which has an estimated total value of$4,746,899.The General Fund has not received funding for the prior investments.The$1.7 million going to the CIP Fund is anticipated to be used for paying annual debt service on bonds that built Fire Stations #3 and#14.The$500,000 in the General Fund would be used in the following item D-5.Note that the available to spend balance of fire impact fees as of March 24 is$1,725,882.An additional$474418 is anticipated revenue through the end of FY2023.If this item is approved,then all the available to spend fire impact fees would be used.The potential existing facilities buy-in option would have$2,546,899 available for future potential reimbursement to the General Fund. D-5: Fire Training Center($499,533 from General Fund to CIP Fund) The Fire Training Center(FTC)is comprised of two CIP projects,the Logistics Center/Large Equipment Garage and the Renovation of the old Fire Station#14.Both projects were referred to as the Fire Training Center. $499,533.39 was appropriated for the renovation of the old Fire Station#14(100%Impact Fee Eligible)and placed in Cost Center 84- 17015 with the title Fire Training Center.These funds were inadvertently expended on the construction of the Fire Training Center Logistics Center(Ineligible for Impact Fees)instead.The Capital Asset Planning team is requesting to move$499,533.39 from non-departmental to a new CIP cost center to reimburse Fire Impact Fees for the FTC Logistics Center.Note that this funding from the General Fund is related to the prior item D-4. D-6: Fisher Mansion Carriage House Impact Fee Reimbursement($1oo,000 from Parks Impact Fees to CIP Cost Overrun Account) An Administrative Budget Adjustment was approved in March 2023 for$1oo,000 of cost overrun for the Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvement Project.The Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvement Project is t00% impact fee eligible and the Capital Asset Planning team is requesting$1oo,000 from Parks Impact Fees to reimburse the cost overrun cost center.If this item is approved,then the CIP Cost Overrun Account would have an available balance of$923,o81. D-7: Recapture of Police Precinct Funds to Surplus($129,688 from CIP Fund to Surplus Land Fund) After four years of inactivity due to the inability to procure a suitable piece of land at the right price,the Finance Department is requesting the recapture of these funds to the Surplus Land cost center.Note that item D-7 would also increase the Surplus Land Fund balance.At the time of publishing this staff report,the current balance of the Surplus Land Fund was being confirmed. D-8: Police Impact Fee—Unclaimed Refunds($237,6o6 from Impact Fees to Police Impact Fees) The Capital Asset Planning Team is requesting to move$237,6o6.45 in unclaimed impact fee refunds back to the Police Impact Fees.This request is being made to comply with Section 603-Refunds,of Utah Code 11-36a-Impact Fees Act. As outlined in the code,the City shall expend any unclaimed refund on capital facilities identified in the current capital facilities plan for the type of public facility for which the impact fee was collected.The unclaimed refunds would no longer be subject to the six-year spending clock all impact fees are typically required to satisfy,and they would still be limited to the eligible uses identified in the City's Impact Fees Plan. D-9: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP($25,000 from General Fund to Fleet Fund) As part of the adoption of FY23 Budget Amendment 5-Initiative A-1-Rapid Intervention Team Trailer,funds were budgeted to Facilities in the General Fund.However,the transfer from General Fund to Fleet Fund was not included in the budget adoption.This amendment is to correct that.By purchasing the trailer through the Fleet Fund,it will become part of their inventory allowing Fleet better track maintenance needs.Request is$25,000 from General Fund to Fleet Fund for the purchase of the trailer for the Rapid Intervention Team. D-io: Difference Between$4.3 Million Grant Adopted in Budget Amendment No.5 and the Actual $4.22 Million) ($78,56o from Misc.Grants) In Budget Amendment#5, $4,300,000 in Miscellaneous Grants funding was adopted to be used toward bonuses for Police POST training,recruitment and retention.Although the$4,300,000 million amount was adopted,the actual available amount is$4,221,440.In order to be accurate in ARPA reporting it is necessary to reduce the budgeted expenditure amount by$78,560. Section E:Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-i:School-Age Quality 22 Grant(FY22-25)($780,000 from Misc.Grants(Funding and Award Title Correction) The Administration indicates this grant was approved on the June 14,2022,Consent Agenda#1 for one year of funding at $390,000 with an incorrect title,timeframe,and award amount.This item will correct the title as well as the timeframe of the grant from one year to three years of funding for YouthCity afterschool Programming at Fairmont Park, Liberty Park,Central City,Ottinger Hall,Sorenson Unity Center and Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center.An additional$780,00 will be added to the budget for an additional two years of funding.A match is not required;however,the Division of Youth and Family Services will be providing a voluntary cash match from staff time.The public hearing was held May 17,2022. E-2:School-Age Quality Summer Expansion FY22-23($373,338 from Misc.Grants)(Correction) The Council approved this item on June 14,2022,under Consent Agenda#1 for one year of funding,$62,223 per YouthCity site,for the summer of 2022.The funding should have reflected funding for the summer of 2023 as well.This item will add additional funding,meaning that each YouthCity site will receive$124,446 for a total grant award of$746,767.The public hearing was held May 17,2022. E-3: State Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY2023 Revision($16o,000 Rescope for Advantages Services from A Prior Award) Note that items A-2,A-3,D-1,and E-3 are all related to increasing funding for the contract between Advantage Services and the City through the end of FY2o23.See the A-2 write-up for more. This request is to rescope$50,000 for the mobile clean team provided by Advantage Services.The funding is from rescoping$50,000 previously awarded to the Salt Lake City Police Department.All the unspent funds must be returned to the State if not used by the end of the fiscal year. $50,000 would be moved from a Police Department cost center to CAN's existing professional services cost center. Section F: Donations (None) Section G: Donations G-1:U.S.Department of Homeland Security,FEMA-Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program ($115,472 from Misc.Grants) Section I: Council Added Items (none) ATTACHMENTS (none) ACRONYMS ARPA—American Rescue Plan Act BA—Budget Amendment CIP—Capital Improvement Program Fund CV—Corona Virus ESG—Emergency Solutions Grant FY—Fiscal Year FOF—Funding Our Future GASB—Governmental Accounting Standards Board GF—General Fund HUD—Housing and Urban Development IMS—Information Management Services RAC—Regional Athletic Complex RDA—Redevelopment Agency VOA—Volunteers of America ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETH THOMPSON Mayor Chief Financial Officer 7 . J DEPARTh=<wFINANCE CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Lis tr (Apr7,202313:47MDT) Date Received: 04/07/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 04/07/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 7, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: Budget Amendment#6 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director(801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson(801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY2022-23 adopted budget. BUDGETIMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $ 19,120,198.00 $ 11,719,731.39 CIP FUND 5,459,533.39 3,859,533.39 CIP:IMPACT FEE FUND 0.00 2,577,466.61 FLEET FUND 160,000.00 160.000.00 MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND 1,268,810.72 15,268,810.72 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 50,000.00 50,000.00 TOTAL $ 28,058,542.11 $ 50,160,062.11 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 238 PO BOX 145467,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2022-23 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2023. Amended Variance FY22-FY23 Annual FY22-23 Amended Favorable Revenue Budget Budget Revised Forecast (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 125,012,927 125,012,927 125,012,927 - Sale and Use Taxes 105,050,018 105,050,018 110,811,754 5,761,736 Franchise Taxes 11,657,128 11,657,128 12,020,987 363,859 Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,638,222 1,638,222 1,638,222 - Total Taxes 243,358,295 243,358,295 249,483,890 6,125,595 Licenses and Permits 40,736,114 40,736,114 39,033,583 (1,702,531) Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644,622 4,644,622 4,892,377 247,755 Interest Income 2,071,154 2,071,154 7,500,000 5,428,846 Fines 3,765,174 3,765,174 3,459,141 (306,033) Parking Meter Collections 2,635,475 2,635,475 2,635,475 - Charges,Fees,and Rentals 4,432,794 4,432,794 4,879,854 447,060 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,438,710 3,438,710 3,959,921 521,211 Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 24,431,717 24,234,739 (196,978) Transfers 28,821,993 34,910,408 34,848,950 (61,458 Total W/O Special Tax 358,336,048 364,424,463 374,927,930 10,503,467 Additional Sales Tax(1/2%) 44,364,490 44,364,490 51,035,000 6,670,510 Total General Fund 402,700,538 408,788,953 425,962,930 17,173,977 The current projections for fiscal year 2023 projections continue to be positive. Sales tax is currently projected to exceed budget by $5.7 million while the sales tax associated with Funding Our Future is projected to exceed budget by $6.8 million. Building permits have slowed and are currently showing a decrease, those losses are slightly offset by small gains in airport parking tax and innkeepers tax, but still show a loss compared to the budget of$1.7 million. Due to the rise in interest rates, interest income shows a large positive variance to budget of$5.4 million. Charges and services and miscellaneous revenue are both trending above budget. In total, current revenue projections are above amended budget by $17.1 million. L6 & 7= Alejandrof.7c ez(Apr 7,202313:40 MDT) Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for BA#6. Beginning Fund Balance :1 1 •.1 i Budgeted Change in Fund Balance 1 1 .1: 1 • • • 1 Prior Year Encumbrances 1 •1 •1• 1 ' 1 Estimated Beginning Fund Balance • • 1 1 1 : • :• •1 Beginning Fund Balance Percent Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes(Prepaids,Receivable,Etc.) • 1 • 1 I I I Fund Balance w/CAFR Changes ' • 1: 1 Final Fund Balance Percent 19.4391b Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment BA#1 Expense Adjustment 1 1 1 1 1 1 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment '1 490,84 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (986,298) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment . off III . off 1 1 1 BA#3 Expense Adjustment off oil 1 1 1 1 1 1 . off BA#4 Revenue Adjustment 1,508,044 .1 1 •• .1 1 BA#4 Expense Adjustment BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 400,000 400,000 BA#5 Expense Adjustment 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1) (5,940 • 1 BA#6 Revenue Adjustment i i I BA#6 Expense Adjustment ' BA#7 Revenue Adjustment •' •' BA#7 Expense Adjustment H off 1 : (12,043,298) Change in Revenue Change in Expense 1 1 .1: i "' 14,235,507 i Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 1 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent Proposed/Adopted Revenue •• 1 1 1 1"1. AL Based on those projections adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 23.00%. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $28,058,542.11 of revenue and expense of$50,160,062.11. The amendment proposes changes in seven funds, with no increases in FTEs. The amendment also includes the use of$7,400,466.61 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes twenty-nine initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards 1. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Sixth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-2023) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2022, and Ending June 30, 2023. In June of 2022, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City's Budget Director, acting as the City's Budget Officer,prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2022. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 12023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Ap roved As To Form (SEAL) Jaysen Oldroyd Bill No. of 2023. Published: 2 FY 2023 Budget Amendment*6 Administration Proposed Council Approved ExpenditureExpenditure Ongoing or One- Initiative Section A. New Items i Cultural Core Contract Amendments GF - (291,000.00) One-time - 1 Cultural Core Contract Amendments GF - 291,000.00 One-time - 2 Homelessness Advantage Services GF - (300,000.00) Ongoing - 2 Homelessness Advantage Services GF - 300,000.00 One-time - Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for 3 New Homeless Services(Advantage GF - - One-time Services) 4 Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain CIP - (695,580.00) One-time Scope Change 4 Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain CIP (127,968.00) One-time Scope Change 4 Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain CIP 823,548.0o One-time Scope Change 5 Open Space Property Acquisition(City Impact Fees - 450,000.00 One-time Parks) 6 Open Space Property Acquisition(Trails) Impact Fees - 300,000.00 One-time 7 Recaptured HUD ESG-CV Funds Misc Grants - (200,000.00) One-time 7 Recaptured HUD ESG-CV Funds Misc Grants - (9,552.00) One-time 7 Recaptured HUD ESG-CV Funds Misc Grants - 209,552.00 One-time 8 Steiner Roof-County Contractual GF - 1,380,000.0o One-time Obligation and City Portion 8 Steiner Roof-County Contractual CIP 1,380,000.00 1,380,000.0o One-time Obligation and City Portion 8 Steiner Roof-County Contractual CIP 1,380,000.00 1,380,000.0o One-time Obligation and City Portion 9 Natural Gas Cost Increase GF - 500,000.00 One-time 9 Natural Gas Cost Increase GF - 135,000.00 One-time 9 Natural Gas Cost Increase Fleet 135,000.00 135,000.00 One-time io Ranked Choice Voting Awareness Materials GF - 35,000.00 Ongoing 11 Environmental Assessment Fund GF - 50,000.00 One-time 11 Environmental Assessment Fund Other Special Rev 50,000.00 50,000.00 One-time 12 IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment Impact Fees - 27,000.00 One-time 13 Flood Mitigation GF 236,275.00 One-time 13 Flood Mitigation(Recaptured All Star GF - 263,725.00 One-time Game Funding) 14 Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement Misc Grants - 18,603,o80.00 One-time 14 Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement GF 18,603,o80.00 8,603,080.0o One-time 14 Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement Storm Water 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 One-time 14 Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement CIP 500,000.00 500,000.00 One-time 15 ARPA Funding to Perpetual Housing Fund Misc Grants - 10,000,000.00 One-time Section B:Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources - 1 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#6 Section D: Housekeeping 1 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal 2 Fire-Other Reimbursements GF 17418.00 17,u8.00 One-time 3 Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land Impact Fees - (395,442.00) One-time -Land Purchase Near RAC 3 Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land Impact Fees - 395,442•00 One-time -Land Purchase Near RAC 3 Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land CIP (500,000.00) - One-time -Land Purchase Near RAC 3 Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land CIP 500,000.00 One-time -Land Purchase Near RAC 4 Fire Impact Fee-Payment for Excess GF 500,000.00 One-time Capacity 4 Fire Impact Fee-Payment for Excess Impact Fees (2,200,000.00) One-time Capacity 4 Fire Impact Fee-Payment for Excess Impact Fees 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 One-time Capacity 4 Fire Impact Fee-Payment for Excess CIP 1,700,000.00 - One-time Capacity 5 Fire Training Center GF - 499,533.39 One-time 5 Fire Training Center CIP 499,533.39 499,533.39 One-time 5 Fire Training Center Impact Fees (499,533.39) (499,533.39) One-time 5 Fire Training Center Impact Fees 499,533.39 One-time 6 Fisher Mansion-Impact Fee Impact Fees (100,000.00) - One-time Reimbursement of Cost Overrun 6 Fisher Mansion-Impact Fee Impact Fees 100,000.00 100,000.00 One-time Reimbursement of Cost Overrun 6 Fisher Mansion-Impact Fee CIP - 100,000.00 One-time Reimbursement of Cost Overrun 7 Recapture of Police Precinct Funds to CIP (1,299,688.00) - One-time Surplus Land 7 Recapture of Police Precinct Funds to CIP 1,299,688.0o One-time Surplus Land 8 Police Impact Fee-Unclaimed Refunds Impact Fees (237,606.45) One-time 8 Police Impact Fee-Unclaimed Refunds Impact Fees 237,606.45 One-time 9 Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP- GF (25,000.00) One-time GF to Fleet 9 Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP- GF - 25,000.00 One-time GF to Fleet 9 Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP- Fleet 25,000.00 25,000.00 One-time - GF to Fleet io Diff between$4.3 grant adopted in BA 5 Misc Grants (78,560.00) One-time - ectlon rants equlring o ew Staff Resources 1 School-age Quality 22 Grant(FY 22-25) Misc Grants 780,000.00 780,000.0o One-time - 2 School-Age Quality Summer Expansion 22- Misc Grants 373,338.00 373,338.0o One-time 3 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Misc Grants (50,000.00) (50,000.00) One-time FY23-Budget Revision 3 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Misc Grants 50,000.00 50,000.00 One-time FY23-Budget Revision 2 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#6 Section G: Council Consent A enda--Grant Awards Consent d: U S Department of Homeland Security, 1 FEMA-Assistance to Firefighters Grant Misc Grants 115,472.72 115,472.72 One-time - Program Section I: Total of Budget Amendment Items 28,058,542.11 5o,16o,o62.n - Administration Proposed Council Approved Expenditurei Ongoing or One- Initiative Total by Fund Class,Budget Amendment#6: General Fund GF 19,120,198.00 11,719,731.39 CIP Fund CIP 5,459,533.39 3,859,533.39 CIP:Impact Fee Funds Impact Fees 2,577,466.61 - Fleet Fund Fleet 16o,000.00 16o,000.00 - Miscellaneous Grant Fund Misc Grants 1,268,810.72 29,793,330.72 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 - Other Special Revenue Other Special Rev 50,000.00 50,000.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 28,058,542.11 5o,16o,o62.11 - 3 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#6 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only FY2022-23Bud et Includin Bud etAmendments FY 2022-23 BA#i Total BA#2 Total BA#3 Total BA#4 Total BA#5 Total Total Revenue Adopted General Fund(FC io) 425,537,408 100,000 6,000,000 194,600 431,832,008 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 41) i,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 4,302,222 4,302,222 Water Fund(FC 51) 108,196,368 36,680,000 260,687 145,137,055 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 196,630,907 196,630,907 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 13,476,733 13,476,733 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 302,268,600 302,268,600 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 21,458,105 21,458,105 Golf Fund(FC 59) 11,560,676 25,700 11,586,376 E-911 Fund(FC 60) 3,925,000 3,925,000 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 28,826,992 120,000 1,119,900 30,066,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 30,523,167 2,627,420 3,099,185 3692499772 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation(FC 69) 9,600,000 9,600,000 CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,670,517 49670,517 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 34,158,918 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,103,151 2,131,170 49,66o,8i8 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 3009000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 2,920,250 20,000 44,668 1,000,000 3,984,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 16,217,000 1692179000 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 32,037,989 (2,951,727) 334,958 29421,220 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 35,460,387 6,603,019 5,267,217 91,967,958 15,149,607 154,448,188 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 3,964,523 2,000,000 500,000 6,4647523 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 54,679,000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,344,180,322 11,592,603 51,009,880 101,347,689 24714,920 19529,8459414 4 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#6 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only FY 2022-23 BudgLet,Includin Bud etAmendments Adopted Budget BA#6 Total BA#7 TotalTotal through BA#5 General Fund(FC io) 431,832,008 19,120,198 450,952,206 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 41) i,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 4,302,222 4,302,222 Water Fund(FC 51) 145,137,055 145437�055 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 196,630,907 196,630,907 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 13,476,733 2,O00,000 15,476,733 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 302,268,600 302,268,600 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 21,458,105 21,458,105 Golf Fund(FC 59) 11,586,376 11,586,376 E-9n Fund(FC 60) 3,925,000 31925�000 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 30,066,892 16o,000 30,226,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 36,249,772 36,249,772 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation(FC 69) 9,600,000 9,600,000 CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,670,517 4,670,517 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 49,660,818 1,268,811 50,9299629 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 50,000 3509000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 3,984,918 3,984,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 16,217,000 1692179000 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 29,421,220 2994219220 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 154,448,188 5,459,533 15999079721 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 6,464,523 69464,523 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 54,6799000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,529,845,414 28,058,542 1 557,903,956 5 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#6 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only F'Y2022-2 Bud et Includin Bud etAmendments Total Expense BA#i Total BA#2 Total BA#3 Total BA#4 Total BA#5 Total Total Expense General Fund(FC 10) 425,537,408 847,540 6,538,000 7,584,328 5,940,349 446,447,625 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 40 1,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,7009000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 5,757,825 5,757,825 Water Fund(FC 51) 132,752,815 36,680,000 260,687 16g,693,502 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 255,914,580 255,914,580 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 18,699,722 18,699,722 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 384,681,671 688,818,000 1,073,499,671 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 24,952,672 3,035,700 27,988,372 Golf Fund(FC 59) 14,726,016 46,800 14,772,816 E-9n Fund(FC 60) 3,800,385 3,8009385 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 30,426,032 4,011,360 10,678,500 45,115,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 30,523,167 2,782,449 3,099,185 36,404,801 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for 9,458,748 9,458,748 Transportation(FC 69) CDBG Operating Fund(FC 71) 4,958,433 4,958,433 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 26,614,153 2,749,584 2,517,995 8,481,711 2,131,170 42,494,613 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 300,000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 287,250 20,000 44,668 1,000,000 1,351,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 25,779,253 100,000 25,879,253 Debt Service Fund(FC 81) 33,658,558 (2,951,727) 334,958 31,041,789 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 35,460,387 11,713,917 12,267,217 96,317,958 15,149,607 170,909,086 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 3,169,767 2,000,000 500,000 5,669,767 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,679,000 54,6799000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,525,603,402 21,442,401 688,8i8,000 61,5839580 123,200,706 27,655,269 2,44893039358 6 FY 2023 Budget Amendment#6 Current Year Budget Summary,provided for information only F'Y2022-2 Bud et Includin Bud etAmendments ExpenseTotal through BA#5 General Fund(FC 10) 446,447,625 11,719,731 458,167,356 Curb and Gutter(FC 20) 3,000 3,000 DEA Task Force Fund(FC 40 1,762,560 1,762,560 Misc Special Service Districts(FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000 Street Lighting Enterprise(FC 48) 5,757,825 5,757,825 Water Fund(FC 51) 16g,6939502 16g,693,502 Sewer Fund(FC 52) 2559914,580 255,914,5$0 Storm Water Fund(FC 53) 189699,722 2,000,000 20,699,722 Airport Fund(FC 54,55,56) 1,073,499,671 19073,499,671 Refuse Fund(FC 57) 27,9889372 27,988,372 Golf Fund(FC 59) 14,772,816 14,772,816 E-9n Fund(FC 60) 3,800,385 3,8009385 Fleet Fund(FC 61) 45,1159892 160,000 45,275,892 IMS Fund(FC 65) 3694049801 36,4049801 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation(FC 69) 9,458,748 9,458,748 CDBG Operating Fund(FC 7 0 4,958,433 4,958,433 Miscellaneous Grants(FC 72) 429494,613 29,793,331 72,287,944 Other Special Revenue(FC 73) 300,000 50,000 350,000 Donation Fund(FC 77) 1,351,918 1,351,918 Housing Loans&Trust(FC 78) 25,879,253 25,879,253 Debt Service Fund(FC 8t) 31,041,789 31,041,789 CIP Fund(FC 83,84&86) 170,9og,o86 6,437,000 177,346,086 Governmental Immunity(FC 85) 59669,767 59669,767 Risk Fund(FC 87) 54,6799000 54,6799000 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,44893039358 50 t6o 062 - - 2,498,463,420 Budget Manager Analyst,City Council Contingent Appropriation 7 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount ection A:New Ite A-i: Cultural Core Contract Amendments GF ($291,000.00) GF $291,000.00 Department:Economic Development Prepared By:Felicia Baca For questions please include Felicia Baca,Lorena Riffo-Jensen,Mary Beth Thompson The Salt Lake City Arts Council(City)and Salt Lake County Arts&Culture(County)are each seeking$50,000 in additional appropriations annually from respective Councils beginning in the contract year in FY24(July 2023)for additional funding for the Cultural Core Action Plan Implementation contract.Funding would be moved from a Cultural Core surplus fund and would be used to maintain existing service levels due to inflation in the six years since the Action Plan Implementation contract was first awarded with no increases since that time. $25oK from each entity is contributed annually to total $5oK appropriation annually with the contract holder until the fund balance is expended. This funding increase has been approved by the Salt Lake County Councils 2023 Adopted Budget.See attachments. A-2: Homelessness Advantage Services GF ($300,000.00) GF $300,000.00 Department:CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions please include Tony Milner,Brent Beck, Blake Thomas Over three fiscal years,the services provided to the City by Advantage Services expanded from a sole focus on the Rio Grande neighborhood to support cleaning needs across the entire city.This expansion of services escalated in FY2i, with a one-time award of$76o,000 to implement a mobile clean team.That team still functions today,providing on- demand clean up of abandoned camp material,voluntary trash removal services from active encampments,and biowaste removal.Services were increased once more with the implementation of the Rapid Intervention framework, with Advantage Services'mobile clean team offering cleaning support for Encampment Impact Mitigations(EIM)and Rapid Intervention site rehabilitations. With the implementation of the mobile clean team,the City has been able to respond to SLC Mobile concerns regarding homelessness that have nearly doubled or tripled each year.Responses are significantly more efficient than in years past,shaving 151 days off the average time it takes to close a case.With the implementation of the Rapid Intervention framework,the City has reduced the average number of days to case closure from 5o days,in July 2022,to four days in March 2023. Advantage Services base budget has remained the same,despite this increase in services provided.The services were expanded with one-time funding over a three-year period.To maintain the level of service provided in the last two fiscal years,this year's budget will fall short.An additional$300,000 is needed for the remainder of the fiscal year,in addition to a rescope of the State Mitigation Grant$16o,000 and Operation Rio Grande$73,418.The request is to use $300,000 of CAN department vacancy savings. A-3: Repurpose Operation Rio Grande Funds for GF $0.00 New Homeless Services(Advantage Services) Department:CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions please include Tony Milner,Brent Beck,Blake Thomas This budget amendment is to include a provider previously not listed in the scope of work and budget through a contract amendment with the County.See attached County contract and unsigned contract amendment. Current Contract: $177,847:The Road Home,FY23 Winter Overflow Operations. I Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Contract Amendment: $104,429:The Road Home,FY23 Winter Overflow Operations,and$73,418:Advantage Services, Overflow Cleaning Costs(a total of$$177,847). The Road Home communicated to the city that they would not be able to fully expend their awarded.Advantage Services would be able to expend the funds,if awarded. A-4: Liberty Park Seven Canyons Fountain Scope CIP ($695,580.00) Change CIP ($127,968.00) CIP $823,548.00 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans For question please include Kristin Riker,Gregg Evans Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to change the scope of work(but not request additional funding)for the Seven Canyons Fountain project at Liberty Park. The remaining funds available in the existing CIP General Funds are$823,548.These are CIP funds designated for use within Liberty Park,and were meant to be used to restore and reopen the Seven Canyons fountain with the existing water feature. Public Lands intends to permanently adapt the fountain into a dry art piece.The funding was originally allocated to make improvements to the fountain required by the Salt Lake County Health Department in order to re-open the fountain as an interactive water feature.After an initial feasibility study,the City determined that re-opening the fountain as a water feature was infeasible due to significant capital costs and projected water use.Therefore,two alternate options were explored: adapting the art into a dry feature,or decommissioning the work altogether and replacing it with something else. A community survey completed in 2021 found that 71%of the 1,643 respondents support the permanent conversion of the fountain into a dry feature,when given the choice between a dry feature and decommissioning the piece entirely. The responses indicated that conserving water,preserving art,and staying within the existing budget were key factors to consider in determining the future of the Seven Canyons Fountain.The Public Lands Department and the Engineering Division also conducted a feasibility study assessing various options for adding water back to the fountain at a lower rate in order to meet the City's and the community's goals of conserving water and taxpayer dollars.It was determined that none of the options that included water were feasible and that(based on community priorities and information from the feasibility study)converting the fountain into a dry feature is the only viable option. Conversion of this community treasure into a dry feature will increase engagement on the site,pay tribute to the original artists'intentions, and create an opportunity to educate community members and youth as to the unique ecology,hydrology,and geology of the Salt Lake Valley's eastern seven canyons. Remaining project tasks may include,but are not limited to: -Conceptual design with artistic input,in cooperation with the Salt Lake City Arts Council -Design of detailed and construction documents -Permitting and soft costs,including contingency -Construction 2 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A-5: Open Space Property Acquisition(City Parks) Impact Fees $450,000.00 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans For question please include Kristin Riker,Gregg Evans Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of$450,000 utilizing Parks Impact Fees to acquire an available parcel of property.This funding request includes all fees associated with acquisition.Any remaining funding from the acquisition would be utilized for immediate remediation needs and addressing potential safety concerns. This property was identified by administration and organizational partners as a key property during the development of an existing property.City acquisition,conversion,and activation of this property for public use is anticipated to largely resolve these issues and enhance the utility,openness,and beauty of the area. Securing this property and beginning remediation on this property would offer an immediate improvement to water and soil quality in this area. Future use of the site would be dependent on planning and community engagement,which would be accomplished and funded in a future phase.Uses may include amenities,programming,and education opportunities that support and serve nearby community institutions,schools,and neighborhoods. By improving neighborhood aesthetics,the project can facilitate surrounding improvements and neighborhood investments that improve quality of life. A-6: Open Space Property Acquisition(Trails) Impact Fees $300,000.00 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Tyler Murdock, Gregg Evans For question please include Kristin Riker,Gregg Evans,Tyler Murdock Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment for$300,000 utilizing Parks Impact Fees to provide a 24%matching contribution to$1,250,000 committed from the State of Utah Department of Outdoor Recreation and in partnership with Utah Open Lands.The combined funding would be used to acquire several acres of open space property located in Salt Lake City. Following acquisition of the property,SLC Public Lands will seek to develop concept designs for construction of a trailhead. This funding request includes all fees associated with acquisition as well concept design for the proposed trailhead.Utah Open Land will also be conducting a fundraising campaign to cover a portion of the acquisition.Any remaining funding would be utilized for immediate trailhead design and construction needs and addressing potential safety concerns. Future use of a Trailhead at this location,would be dependent on planning and community engagement to identify existing concerns and develop a plan that would mitigate and improve trail access for all users.Future uses for a portion of this property would include trailhead amenities including,parking,fencing,possibly restroom and other trailhead amenities. 3 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A-7: Recaptured HUD ESG-CV Funds Misc Grants ($200,000.00) Misc Grants ($9,552.00) Misc Grants $209,552.00 Department:CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions please include Tony Milner,Brent Beck,Blake Thomas This budget amendment is seeking to reallocate unspent HUD ESG-CV funds to a provider and activity,previously approved by Council,for eligible ESG-CV services(see attached Council Motion Sheet and Exhibit A). This budget amendment would shift funds: FROM: ESG-CV City Admin(Exhibit A,page 7,item 8) $20o,000,and ESG-CV Volunteers of America's Homeless Outreach Program(Exhibit A,page 6,item 4) $9,552.37, TO: ESG-CV Utah Community Action's Homeless Prevention program(Exhibit A,page 5,item 1), $209,552.37• Volunteers of America communicated to the City that they are unable to spend the remainder of their award. Conversely,Utah Community Action requested a need for additional funds.This request has been reviewed by staff and the attached Adjustment Justification outlines the agency's need and capacity to receive and utilize additional funding. Housing Stability has forecasted the set-aside Admin funds will not be spent down before the HUD deadline,and these are available to be reallocated. Shifting this amount of funding would not require a Substantial Amendment,as outlined in the City's HUD 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and Citizen Participation Plan.Additionally,these ESG-CV funds cannot be reallocated to traditional ESG funding or activities,and Utah Community Action has demonstrated their ability to spend ESG-CV funds while adhering to HUD ESG-CV governing regulations. A-8: Steiner Roof-County Contractual Obligation GF $1,380,000.00 and City Portion CIP $1,380,000.00 CIP $1,38o,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dawn Valente For questions please include Dawn Valente,JP Goates,George Chamoro The Steiner Aquatics Center was installed in 20oo and is failing to the point that replacement is now necessary based on a study completed by The Garland Co.and Logan DeWitt. PROJECT TOTAL $2,76o,000 County portion 50% $1,38o,000 City portion 50% $1,38o,000 The current agreement with Salt Lake County Parks and Recreation states that both parties will share the cost of capital repairs and replacements of the building systems at 50%for each party.This request will also allow for acceptance of the County's portion of this cost. 4 Salt Lake City FY2022-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A-9: Natural Gas Cost Increase GF $500,000.00 GF $135,000.00 Fleet $135,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dawn Valente For questions please include Dawn Valente, JP Goates, George Chamoro The wholesale natural gas costs for City Facilities are on state contract with BP. In January we received the invoice for December services and saw an increase of double our average costs. Then in February we received our invoice for January services which saw a dramatic increase from an average of$7 per decatherm at the beginning of the fiscal year to$49. These increases are due to several factors in supply and the wholesale gas rates,which typically have saved the City a great deal of money. The extremely large increases appear to have subsided,however rates have not fallen back down to the lower historical rates that were seen previously,and are still double our average costs. This request is for one-time funding for the current fiscal year for this unforeseen rate increase in supply chain. The funding for next fiscal year has been included in our FY24 budget insights. A-1o: Ranked Choice Voting Awareness Materials GF $35,000.00 Department:Attorney's Office Prepared By: Olivia Hoge For questions please include Cindy Lou Trishman, Olivia Hoge It has been confirmed there will be no state funding available for awareness of Ranked Choice Voting this election.Any awareness materials must be funded by the City.For fiscal year 22-23,the Recorder's office is requesting$35,000 to cover awareness materials and an additional$4o,000 in the FY 23-24 proposal provided the expenses will the incurred between July and October. Awareness for this fiscal year shall include brochures,large QR posters,stickers,vinyl banners for tabling,candy for tabling,translation services,scripts for PSA,graphic design subscription for the creation of awareness materials,radio ads,billboards,and more. A-11: Environmental Assessment Fund GF $50,000.00 Other Special $50,000.00 Rev Department: Sustainability Prepared By:Angie Brohamer For questions please include Debbie Lyons,Angie Brohamer $1oo,000 was allocated in FY23 to pay for environmental assessments and remediation planning in order to facilitate smooth property transactions and address immediate and unexpected environmental contamination concerns.To date, most of the funding has been used to facilitate development of the old Redwood Road dump site,working under the State DEQ Voluntary Cleanup Program. $50,000 is requested to ensure environmental assessment and planning of this site can continue without delay,in addition to having funds available to address other needs related to unexpected environmental issues and other city sites,such as the Fleet block and city right-of-way dedications.This funding amount is expected to meet the funding needs through FY23. With this budget change,a straw poll is requested from the Council. 5 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment #6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount A-12: IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment Impact Fees $27,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith For question please include Mary Beth Thompson,Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith The Finance Department is requesting$9,000 from Parks&Public Land Impact Fees, $9,000 from Fire Impact Fees, and$9,000 from Police Impact Fees to fund an amendment to the Impact Fee Facilities Plan(IFFP)consultant contract.The department will work with the consultants to complete updates to the IFFPs and Impact Fee Analysis. A-13: Flood Mitigation GF $236,275.00 GF $263,725.00 Department:Fire Prepared By:Clint Rasmussen For questions please include Mary Beth Thompson,Clint Rasmussen, Chief Boden Salt Lake City Administration and Emergency Management requests funds to be used for sandbagging,diversion walls, Joint Hazard Analysis Teams,and will also be used in the event there is wide scale flooding and a response is needed. The$263,725 is funding remaining from the NBA Allstar Game activation funding that is being proposed to be redirected toward flood mitigation purposes. A-14:Additional ARPA Revenue Replacement Misc Grants $18,603,o80.00 GF $8,603,o80.00 Storm Water $2,000,000.00 CIP $500,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:John Vuyk For questions please include Mary Beth Thompson,Danny Walz,John Vuyk The Administration is proposing to accept an additional$18,603,o8o million in ARPA funding for revenue replacement for fiscal year 2023.These funds will then be transferred to the RDA for the purchase of property($4,000,000),drop to Fund Balance to be used in Fiscal Year 2024($10,000,000), be used for Rapid Intervention equipment($103,o8o),the community grants distributed through CAN($2,000,000),move funding to CIP for Odyssey house($5oo,000),and transfer$2,000,000 to Public Utilities to be used as a match with state funding. A-15:ARPA Funding to Perpetual Misc Grants $10,000,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Rachel Otto For questions please include Mary Beth Thompson,Rachel Otto Mayor Mendenhall is requesting that the City Council approve a$io million budget amendment to be distributed to a non-profit development organization named the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah, LLC (PHF)for affordable housing development and wealth building opportunities for PHF project residents. Additionally,the Administration is seeking feedback on the pre-funding conditions the Administration is proposing to PHF for this allocation. For additional information on this proposal see Attachment #1 Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources "Rewwition C: Grants for New Staff Resources 6 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Section D: Housekeepin D-i: State Mitigation Grant to Advantage Services Misc Grants ($i6o,000.00) Misc Grants $16o,000.00 Department:CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions please include Tony Milner,Brent Beck,Blake Thomas Housing Stability has identified$16o,000.00 that is projected to go unspent in this fiscal year's Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation award from the State.Rather than return the funds,Housing Stability has asked the State to amend this award to include Advantage Services as a subcontractor,in order to fill any remaining gaps in funding for needed cleaning services throughout the City. The State is working on a budget change request to SLC's Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation award for$16o,000.00 to be directed to Advantage Services.SLCPD has identified$50,000,VOA has identified$5o,000,and Housing Stability has identified$6o,000 from each of their awards that would otherwise be returned to the State. D-2: Fire-Other Reimbursements GF $17,118.00 Department:Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen For questions please include Clint Rasmussen,Chief Karl Lieb The Fire Department has provided several services in which it expects to receive a reimbursement including:training backfill costs incurred on behalf of Utah Search and Rescue(USAR),and Fire Investigation overtime incurred on behalf of the Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms,and Explosives(ATF). Utah Search and Rescue(USAR)Training/Backfill $8,820.33 Camp Williams Exercises,K9 Training,Tech Search Specialist Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms,and Explosives(ATF) $8,297.39 Sugarhouse Fire Investigation/Overtime Total Reimbursement $17,117.72 D-3:Transfer Parks Impact Fees to Surplus Land- Impact Fees ($395,442.00) Land Purchase Near RAC Impact Fees $395,442.00 Department:Public Lands Prepared By:Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans For questions please include Kristin Riker, Gregg Evans,Mike Atkinson Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to reimburse the Surplus Land Fund using Parks Impact Fees for a previous year property acquisition. In 2019,the Council approved$500,000 of Surplus Land Funds to be used to fund the purchase of two parcels near the Regional Athletic Complex(Rose Park Lane)references BA3 FY19 A-1. The actual cost of the acquisition came in at$395,441.70.Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment to transfer$395,442 from Parks Impact Fees to a new impact fee cost center to reimburse the actual cost of the land and to recapture the original$5oo,000 appropriation back to the Surplus Land account. D-4: Fire Impact Fee-Payment for Excess Capacity Impact Fees $2,200,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith For question please include Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith,Mary Beth Thompson The FY2o17 IFFP includes $4,746,899 for existing facilities buy-in(Excess Capacity).The General Fund has not received any funds for excess capacity.Fire Impact Fees has a current unallocated balance of approximately $2,20o,000.Finance is requesting to distribute$500,000 to the General Fund and$1,700,000 to CIP from Fire Impact Fees for excess capacity. 7 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount D-5: Fire Training Center GF $499,533.39 CIP $499,533.39 Impact Fees ($499,533.39) Department:Finance Prepared By:Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith For question please include Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith,Mary Beth Thompson The Fire Training Center(FTC)is comprised of two CIP projects,the Logistics Center/Large Equipment Garage and the Renovation of the old Fire Station#14.Both of these projects were referred to as the Fire Training Center. $499,533.39 was appropriated for the renovation of the old Fire Station#14(100%Impact Fee Eligible)and placed in Cost Center 84-17015 with the title Fire Training Center.These funds were inadvertently expended on the construction of the Fire Training Center Logistics Center(Ineligible for Impact Fees)instead.The Capital Asset Planning team is requesting to move$499,533.39 from non-departmental to a new CIP cost center to reimburse Fire Impact Fees for the FTC Logistics Center. D-6: Fisher Mansion- Impact Fee Reimbursement of Impact Fees $100,000.00 Cost Overrun CIP $100,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith For question please include Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith,Mary Beth Thompson An Administrative Budget Adjustment was approved in March 2023 for$100,000 of cost overrun for the Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvement Project.The Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvement Project is t00% impact fee eligible and the Capital Asset Planning team is requesting$100,00o from Parks Impact Fees to reimburse the cost overrun cost center. D-7: Recapture of Police Precinct Funds to Surplus CIP ($1,299,688.00) Land CIP $1,299,688.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith For question please include Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith,Mary Beth Thompson After four years of inactivity due to the inability to procure a suitable piece of land at the right price,the Finance Department is requesting the recapture of these funds to the Surplus Land cost center. D-8: Police Impact Fee-Unclaimed Refunds Impact Fees ($237,6o6.45) Impact Fees $237,6o6.45 Department:Finance Prepared By:Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith For question please include Mike Atkinson,Jordan Smith,Mary Beth Thompson The Capital Asset Planning Team is requesting to move $237,606.45 in unclaimed impact fee refunds back to the Police Impact Fees.This request is being made to comply with Section 603 -Refunds,of Utah Code 11-36a-Impact Fees Act. As outlined in the code,the City shall expend any unclaimed refund on capital facilities identified in the current capital facilities plan for the type of public facility for which the impact fee was collected. 8 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount D-9: Rapid Intervention Team Trailer RV/XP— GF to GF ($25,000.00) Fleet GF $25,000.00 Fleet $25,000.00 Department:Public Services Prepared By:Dawn Valente For questions please include Dawn Valente,Jorge Chamorro As part of the adoption of FY23 Budget Amendment 5-Initiative Ai-Rapid Intervention Team Trailer,funds were budgeted to Facilities in the General Fund. However,the transfer from General Fund to Fleet Fund was not included in the budget adoption.This amendment is to correct that. By purchasing the trailer through the Fleet fund it will become part of their inventory allowing Fleet better track maintenance needs. Request is$25,000 from General Fund to Fleet Fund for the purchase of the trailer for the Rapid Intervention Team. D-io: Difference Between$4.3 Million Grant Misc Grants ($78,560.00) Adopted in BA*5 and the Actual$4.22 Million Amount Department:Finance Prepared By:Mary Beth Thompson For question please include Mary Beth Thompson In Budget Amendment*5, $4,300,000 in Miscellaneous Grants funding was adopted to be used toward bonuses for Police POST training,recruitment and retention. Although the$4,300,000 million amount was adopted,the actual available amount is$4,221,440. In order to be accurate in ARPA reporting it is necessary to reduce the budgeted expenditure amount by$78,560. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-i: School-age Quality 22 Grant(FY 22-25) Misc Grants $780,000.00 Department:Finance Prepared By:Ann Garcia For questions please contact Ann Garcia,Mary Beth Thompson `FUNDING and AWARD TITLE CORRECTION' City Council approved this item on Consent Agenda*i,June 14,2022 for one year of funding at$390,000. It was approved with an incorrect award title.It was listed as School Age Program Summer Expansion Grant 2022-2023. This correction will correct the title of the award and add the additional awarded 2 years for a 3-year award grant period.The award was actually$390,00o a year for 3 years of funding totaling$1,170,000.This Agenda item is to budget for the addition of$780,00o for additional 2 years of funding that was not included in the first Consent Agenda No new FTEs. The Division of Youth and Family Services received$390,00o each year for three years to provide YouthCity afterschool programming at Fairmont Park,Liberty Park,Central City,Ottinger Hall,Sorenson Unity Center,and Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center. No match is required by the funding agency.The Division is providing a voluntary cash match of the Division's General Fund 2022-2025 budget for salaries and fringe benefits for 100%full time equivalent(FTE)of seven site staff and one Associate Director for program delivery,50%FTE of the Division Director for administrative oversight,and 50%FTE of one Office Facilitator for general support. A public hearing will be held for the grant application on May 17,2022. BA # 6 Housekeeping Item 9 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Approved by Council 6114122 Funding Grant Award Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 $1,170,000.00 $390,000.00 $390,000.00 $390,000.00 $780,000.00 E-School-Age Quality Summer Expansion 22-23 Misc Grants $373,338 Department: Finance Prepared By:Ann Garcia For questions please contact Ann Garcia,Mary Beth Thompson ***FUNDING CORRECTION*** City Council approved this item on Consent Agenda#i,June 14,2022 for one year of funding for each of the six sites at $62,223/each site for 1 summer period only.The sites are: Fairmont Park,Liberty Park,Central City,Ottinger Hall, Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center,and Unity Center.The award was actually for a total of$746,767 Each site was approved a budget of$62,223 totaling$373,338 for summer 2022.We failed to include the funding for the summer of 2023. This budget agenda item is to add the addtitional summer year amount.We originally budgeted for$62,223 for each of the 6 sites.This is to correct the budget and increase the budget for each of the 6 sites by$62,223 for each of the 6 sites. (see chart below) After this correction,each of the 6 sites will have a budget of$124,446,totaling the grant award of $746,767• A public hearing for this application was on 05/17/2022. BA# 6 Housekeeping Item Approved by Council 6114122 Funding Grant Award Year 1 - Summer Year 2 - Summer Cost Center divided by 6 sites 2022 2023 $746,767.00 $373,338.00 $373,338.00 Divided by 6 sites: Divided by 6 sites: 72-12215 Fairmont Park $62,223.00 $62,223.00 72-12216 Liberty Park $62,223.00 $62,223.00 72-12217 Central City $62,223.00 $62,223.00 72-12218 Ottinger Hall $62,223.00 $62,223.00 72-12219 Sorenson Unity Center $62,223.00 $62,223.00 Sorenson Multi-Cultural 72-12220 Center $62,223.00 $62,223.00 $373,338.00 10 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount E-3: Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY23 - Misc Grants ($50,000.00) Budget Revision Misc Grants $50,000.00 Department:CAN Prepared By:Tony Milner,Ann Garcia For questions please include Tony Milner,Ann Garcia,Brent Beck Housing Stability has identified$160,000.0o that is projected to go unspent in this fiscal year's Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation award from the State.Rather than return the funds,Housing Stability has asked the State to amend this award to include Advantage Services as a subcontractor,in order to fill any remaining gaps in funding for needed cleaning services throughout the City. The State is working on a budget change request to SLC's Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation award for$160,000.0o to be redirected to Advantage Services under the CAN cost center within the Professional Services category.SLCPD has identified$50,000 which will be moved from Police to CAN to be used toward the Advantage Services contract. VOA has identified$50,000,and Housing Stability has identified$60,00o from each of their awards that would otherwise be returned to the State. These amounts will be repurposed toward the Advantage Services contract but will not need to be moved to a different cost center,staying with the CAN cost center. The Budget revision will reflect the following adjustments to each of the cost centers: CC*72-12304: CAN/Housing Stability: (+ $50,000) (repurpose$60,00o from Salaries to Prof.Svcs.) (repurpose$50,000 from VOA SubAward to Prof.Svcs.) (Advantaged Services will be added under the Professional Services category with a$160,00o budget)This would include the$60,00o from Salaries; $50,000 from the VOA SubAward and$50,000 from SLC PD CC. CC*72-22302: SLC Police Dept.: (-$50,000-redirect to CAN CC*72-12304 under the Professional Services category for Advantaged Services.) Section F: Donations Section G: Consent A enda Consent Agenda*7 G-i: US Department of Homeland Security,FEMA- Misc. Grants $115,472.72OO Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program Department:Fire Department Prepared By: Brittany Blair/Ann Garcia The Fire Department applied for and received a US Department of Homeland Security,FEMA grant in the amount of $115,472.72. This grant will be used to purchase equipment and personal protective equipment which is used by firefighters to protect the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire-related hazards. Equipment includes: 116 ea.(NFPA 1977)Compliant-Wildland Goggles,Helmets,Pants,Web Gear/Backpacks/Canteens,and Shelters. The grant requires a match of$11,547.28 which is budgeted for within the Fire Departments general fund budget. A Public Hearing was held on 4-5-22 for the grant application on this award. Section I: Council Added Items 11 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Attachments Attachment*i ARPA Funding to Perpetual Housing Fund When the City first received notice of the significant Rescue Plan Funds that it would receive,the Administration set out to identify the principles by which it would propose this money be allocated. In addition to taking care of the City's most urgent needs(revenue replacement,public safety, and emergency shelter),the Administration's goal is to allocate a large portion of Rescue Plan Funds in a way that leverages private investment and creates lasting,generational changes for families in Salt Lake City. This proposal provides funding for an affordable housing development with a unique tenant wealth building program. The City's funds are anticipated to be used as transformational seed funds for development costs, including the cost for PHF to acquire existing structures to construct affordable units. With the help of other partners and the leveraging of City funds, PHF's ultimate organizational goal is to provide approximately 1500 safe,stable, and affordable homes in Salt Lake City that benefit individuals and families by helping them build income. Over the next 20 years, PHF anticipates that this investment will translate into $50 million in the hands of lower-and middle-income City residents. About the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah PHF is a Utah non-profit affordable housing developer whose mission is to reimagine existing housing programs to share profits with PHF project residents. PHF exists to help remove financial barriers that keep a rapidly expanding portion of population from building wealth where they live. Unlike other non-profit affordable housing development entities that use profits to build more affordable units, PHF will share their profits with residents in a variety of ways, as detailed in the next section. PHF plans to develop projects in Salt Lake City that provide rent and income restricted affordable units. PHF anticipates breaking ground on two affordable housing projects in Salt Lake City in 2024 that will serve those at 25-120%AMI. From there,they plan to develop over 2,000 affordable units over the next decade. PHF's first two projects will be located in Salt Lake City,with a priority to aquire additional land in the City for subsequent projects. 12 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Through this investment from the City, PHF will be able to develop wealth-building affordable housing units at the 515 east 100 south location, and ensure that future PHF projects are not driven by maximizing return to financial investors but rather remain committed to sharing wealth with PHF project residents. How the profit-sharing model works PHF projects are anticipated to be financed with traditional affordable housing resources, and may include Low Income Housing Tax Credits(LIHTCs). Under PHF's model, PHF will share with PHF project residents the majority of profits generated from annual cash flow,long-term equity generation, and future refinance and sale proceeds. The amount of cash flow and profit(which will translate into payouts to the tenants)will largely depend on annual rent increases and the paydown of the project's mortgage. Over the past several years, area median incomes(AMIs)have been increasing much faster than is projected when development projects are underwritten and financed.With LIHTC-funded projects, rental rates are tied to AMIs and, as such,rents have been increasing faster than projected.Traditional developers and their investors have been receiving the financial benefits of these rapidly escalating rents that increase annual cash flow of the project. Instead of reaping these benefits for the developer and investors, PHF would share these financial benefits with PHF project residents. PHF will establish a nonprofit tenant entity that,while not having a fee ownership interest in the development, will have a permament interest in the development and the contractural obligation to ensure PHF project residents will receive profits from the project. The ownership and profits-interest structure will vary slightly, depending on if the project utilizes LIHTCs and has a tax credit investor in the ownership structure during the first years after a PHF project is placed into service.The ownership structure and profits-interest will generally be as follows: OWNERSHIP % PROFIT LIHTC INVESTOR 99.99% io% PHF&FUND INVESTORS 0.01% 15% RESIDENTS/TENANT NPO 0.00% 75% NON LIHTC PROJECTS& LIHTC PROJECTS:YEAR 16 + 13 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount OWNERSHIP% PROFIT PHF&FUND INVESTORS 99.99% 25.00% RESIDENTS/TENANT NPO 0.00% 75.00% The profits-interest not otherwise allocated to the PHF project residents will offset costs associated with developing and managing the units. PHF project residents will not have ownership or shares in the real estate itself. Rather,there will be an agreement between the tenant nonprofit entity and the PHF project residents to distribute proceeds in the following ways. • Annual rent rebate—A portion of the project's annual cash flow(profit after collecting all rent and other income,paying all operating expenses,paying debt service, and setting aside cash reserves for future repairs)that would typically be received by the developer will be allocated to current PHF project residents as a rent rebate via cash payment to be distributed on an annual basis. • Profit payout—When there is an event that generates profit, or further cashflow(refinance, exit of the limited partner, etc.), all the cumulative residents over time will receive a payment that represents a proportionate share of the available profit.The proportion of the profit a household receives will depend on the length of time they lived in a PHF unit.With projects that involve LIHTCs,the profit generating event will often happen 15 years after the project is placed into service because that's when the tax credits end and the LIHTC investor exits the ownership structure. • Profit advance— PHF will set aside a portion of its initial developer fee for the project to fund a o%, zero payment revolving fund to help PHF project residents access a portion of their anticipated profits early in the event of an emergency or major life event(medical, educational, entrepreneurial, etc.). These funds are replenished from the PHF project resident's share of profit whenever a profit payout would naturally happen. • Profit tradeup— PHF will be co-developing hundreds of units with the Rocky Mountain Homes Fund (RMHF), an entity that provides a missing-middle home ownership option for households making 6o- 12o%AMI (and occasionally less). Subject to availability, PHF tenants will be able to transfer their accruals from a PHF project for a 1:1 reduction in purchase price on a RMHF home. INITIAL PROJECT 515 East ioo South • Adaptive reuse of an existing office building and new construction of an additional building,to occur in phases. • This property will have multiple social-equity based future uses and is slated to be acquired in May 2023.The floors on which affordable units will be constructed will be condominiumized and separated and then sold to PHF prior to ARPA City funds being utilized on the project. o Phase 1:Adaptive reuse. 14 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount ■ Estimated to begin construction in Q4 2023 or Q12024 and be completed by the end of 2024. • —38 units with a mix of studios, 1 Bedrooms, 3-Bedrooms, and 4-Bedrooms on floors 9- 11 of the existing office tower. ■ All 38 residential units will be affordable to incomes at 25%-50%of AMI. ■ Curently slated to also include profit-sharing coworking/office model similar to PHF in other floors. o Phase 2: New building. • Estimated to begin construction Q2 2024 and be completed in 2026. • ~4o new units (depending on final construction estimates/cost constraints)with a mix of 5% Studios, 25% 3-Bedroom, and 70% 2-Bedroom • ~48 units will be PHF(25-50%AMI) Affordable daycare on bottom floor, available to building users of all incomes. CONDITIONS FOR FUNDING If the Council approves the proposed funding allocation,the Administration(acting through the RDA) and PHF will execute a funding agreement with the following conditions to ensure that Rescue Plan Funds are deployed in accordance with federal regulations and in a manner that brings the greatest public benefit for City residents and prospective residents. The Administration requests the Council's feedback on the following conditions and any other conditions the Council would like to see in this agreement: 1. PHF will deploy 100%of the City's Rescue Plan Funds on eligible projects in Salt Lake City and in compliance with ARPA requirements before June 30, 2024. More specifically,the funds will be spent by PHF on the purchase of the condominiumized affordable units and construction costs for the project at 515 east 10o south. 2. The Rescue Plan Funds will be distributed concurrently with PHF closing on the acquisition of the affordable units. 3. At the same time that the Rescue Plan Funds are distributed, PHF will record a restrictive covenant requiring PHF to maintain affordable housing at the 515 east too south project at 25-50%AMI, construct and maintain a mix of unit sizes, and wealth building(as detailed above)for a period of not less than 30 years.The restrictive covenant will also require PHF to provide a quarterly report to the RDA. 4. The funding agreement will require PHF to commit to developing future projects in Salt Lake City and ensure those projects contain units affordable to those at 65%AMI and below. 5. PHF will implement an equitable process for tenant selection and, as permitted by law,potentially prioritize certain applicants if the City desires. 6. As permitted by ARPA,the RDA, as a transformational seed funder,will be treated like an equity investor and receive between a 2%and 6%return on its capital contribution,paid annually every year. 7. RDA to approve all legal agreements as recommended by the City Attorney. 8. Prior to distributing the funds, PHF will have received all required City approvals for the project to move forward. 9. Prior to distributing the funds, PHF will demonstrate sufficient construction financing for the project to move forward. 15 Salt Lake City FY2o22-23 Budget Amendment *6 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 1o. Prior to distributing the funds, PHF will demonstrate compliance with the RDA's sustainability policy, which requires the project demonstrate that the units be designed to achieve an energy star score of go or higher and participate in the City's Elivate Buildings Program.The units must also be designed to operate without on-site fossil fuel combustion. 11. Adequate security and remedies should PHF default on their obligations under the funding or restrictive use agreement. 16 Impact Fees - Summary Confidential Data pulled 03/24/2023 Unallocated Budget Amounts:by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Now. Cash Impact fee-Police 8484001 $ 1,061,156 A Impact fee-Fire 8484002 $ 1,725,882 B Impact fee-Parks 8484003 $ 15,534,954 c Impact fee-Streets 8484005 $ 5,248,024 D $ 23,570,017 E=A+B+C+D Expiring Amounts:by Major Area,by Month QuarterCalendar Fiscal Total Month 202207(Ju12022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202208(Aug2022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202209(Sep2022) 2023Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202210(oct2022) 2023Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - M 202211(Nov2022) 2023Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - O 202212(Dec2022) 2023Q2 $ $ $ $ $ 202301(Jan2023) 2023Q3 $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ 202302(Feb2023) 2023Q3 $ $ $ $ $ Current Month 202303(Mlar2023) 2023Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202304(Apr2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202305(Mlay2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202306(Jun2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202307(Ju12023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202308(Aug2023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202309(Sep2023) 2024Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202310(Oct2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - V- 202311(Nov2023) 2024Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - O 202312(Dec2023) 2024Q2 $ $ $ $ $ 202401(Jan2024) 2024Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202402(Feb2024) 2024Q3 $ $ $ $ $ 202403(Mlar2024) 2024Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202404(Apr2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202405(Mlay2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202406(Jun2024) 2024Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202407(Ju12024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202408(Aug2024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202409(Sep2024) 2025Q1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202410(oct2024) 2025Q2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - In 202411(Nov2024) 2025Q2 $ $ $ $ $ O 202412(Dec2024) 2025Q2 $ $ $ $ $ 202501(Jan2025) 2025Q3 $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ 202502(Feb2025) 2025Q3 $ $ $ $ $ 202503(Mar2025) 2025Q3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202504(Apr2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202505(May2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 202506(Jun2025) 2025Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total,Currently Expiring through June 2024 $ 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 0 Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 03/24/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD=AAA-BBB-CCC UnAllocated Allocation Allocation Allocation Budget Police Budget Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Amount ADDrouriation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Descri lion Cost Center Budget Amended Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YID Expenditures Remaining ADDrooriation Public Safe Buildin Re Icmn 8405005 $ 14,068 $ 14,068 $ $ 0 1,061,156 Eastside Preci nt 8419201 $ 21,639 $ - $ - $ 21,639 Police Im act Fee Refunds 8421102 237,606 $ $ 237,606.45 Grand Total 273,314 14,068 259,246 8984001 A Allocation Allocation Allocation Budget Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Fire Appropriation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Description Cost Center eudoet Amended Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD Expenditures Remaining ADDrouriation $1 725 882 Fi re'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 $ 3.079 $ 3,021 $ - 58.00 / , Grand Total 3,079 3,021 - 58.00 8484002 B Allocation Allocation Allocation Budget Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Parks Appropriation Sum of Parks Allocation Sum of Parks Allocation Sum of Parks Allocation Descri lion Cost Center Budoet Amended Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Expenditures Remaining ADDrouriation Water ark Redwelounnent Plan 8421402 $ 16,959 $ 1,705 $ 15,254 $ - JR Boat Ram 8420144 $ 3,337 $ - $ 3,337 $ - FisherCarriage House 8420130 $ 261,187 $ - $ 261,187 $ - Park'sConsultant'sCordrart 8419204 $ 2,638 $ 2,596 $ - $ 42 Cwide DW Lease Imp 8418002 $ 23,262 $ 23,000 $ - $ 262 Rosewood Park 8417013 $ 1,056 $ - $ - $ 1,056 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 $ 1,570 $ - $ - $ 1,570 Jordan RTrail Land A mu alto 8417017 $ 2,946 $ - $ - $ 2,946 9line rk 8416005 $ 16,495 $ 855 $ 11,007 $ 4,633 Im erialParkShadeAcct' 8419103 $ 6,398 $ - $ - $ 6,398 Rih Prk Camm Garden 8420138 $ 12,431 $ 4,328 $ - $ 8,103 Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 $ 9,350 $ - $ - $ 9,350 Trailhead Prop Acuutsition 8421403 $ 275,000 $ - $ 253,170 $ 21,830 Fisher House Exploration Ch' 8421401 $ 455030 $ $ 199,029 $ 23,006 sion3reeks 8420406 $ 56,109 $ - $ 1,302 $ 54,808 mAe uPiak BcPhase II 8417011 1,042.694 $ 583,842 $ 381,893 $ 76,959 F$0.15,534,95 13Ck -flu- 8420424 $ 254,159 $ 133,125 $ 8,351 $ 112,683id a to dunn 8420430 $ 156,565 $ 12,273 $ 26,565 $ 117,728 UTGm Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 $ 122,281 $ - $ 775 $ 121,507 43 C 91.ine Orchard 8420136 $ 156,827 $ 7,983 $ 6,232 $ 142,612 Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 $ 150,736 $ - $ - $ 150,736 Historic Renovation AIIenParx 8422410 $ 420,000 $ 216,397 $ 43,979 $ 159,624 Rose Park Nei hborhood Center 8423403 $ 160,819 $ - $ - $ 160,819 RAC Pla round With Shad:Sails 8422415 $ 179,323 $ - $ 117 $ 179,206 Brid eto Backman 8418005 $ 266,306 $ 10,285 $ 4,262 $ 251,758 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 $ 287,848 $ - $ - $ 287,848 Li Min NE Baseball Field 8423409 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 SLC Foothills Land A uisition 8422413 $ 319,139 $ - $ - $ 319,139 Part 's Trail Deli n&Constr 8417012 $ 327,678 $ - $ - $ 327,678 Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 $ 428,074 $ 9,343 $ 19,114 $ 399,617 Wasatch Hollow Impumnsments, 8420142 $ 446825 $ 21,823 $ 11,177 $ 413,824 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway8422414 $ 510:000 $ 15,813 $ 28,549 $ 465,638 Gatewa Traan le Property Park 8423408 $ 499,563 $ - $ - $ 499,563 RAC P. round Phase II 8423405 $ 521,564 $ - $ - $ 521,564 Greenl 200 E Dssi n 8422408 $ 608,490 $ 68,606 $ 7,508 $ 532,3765 Mem.Tree Grave Desi n&Infra 8423407 $ 867,962 $ - $ 1,016 $ 866,946 SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevel mnt 8422412 $ 1,304,682 $ 71,182 $ 17,200 $ 1,216,300 GlendaleWtr rk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 $ 3,177,849 $ 1,007,176 $ 392,984 $ 1,777,688 Pioneer Park 8419150 $ 3,149,123 $ 60,589 $ 64,710 $ 3,023,825 Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000 $ 4,350,000 Grand Total 2 85 274 3 916 2.458,717 $ 16,909,641 Allocation Allocation Allocation Budget Amended Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Streets Appropriation Sum of Street Allocation Sum of Street Allocation Sum of Street Allocation Descri lion Cost Center Budoet Amended Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Remaining ADDrouriation 900 S Si nal Improvements IF 8422615 $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 5 - 500 700 S Sheet Reccnstrudio 8412001 $ 15,026 $ 11,703 $ 3,323 $ - 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 $ 63,955 $ - $ 63,955 $ - Local Link Construction IF .22606 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - Trans Im rovemeMs 8419007 $ 13,473 $ 13,473 $ - $ - CwridorTransformationsIF 8422608 $ 25,398 $ 25,398 $ - $ - Tcans Master Plan 8419006 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ - $ - Gladiola Sheet 8406001 $ 16,109 $ 12,925 $ 940 $ 2,244 $ 5,248,024 Urban Trails FY22IF 8422619 $ 6,500 $ - $ - $ 6,500 Transportalm Safety Im rvmt IF 8422620 $ 44,400 $ - $ 37,016 $ 7,384 Street'sConsuHant'sContact 8419203 $ 29,817 $ 17,442 $ - $ 12,374 Corn late Sheet Enhancements 8420120 $ 35,392 $ - $ 16,693 $ 18,699 500 to 700 S 8418016 $ 22,744 $ - $ - $ 22,744 8484005 D 900 South 91.ine RR Cross IF 8422604 $ 28,000 $ - $ - $ 28,000 Trans Saf Im rovements 8420110 $ 58,780 $ 17,300 $ 8,324 $ 33,156 17005 Corridor Transfrmhm IF 8422622 $ 35,300 $ - $ - $ 35,300 200STransitCm ItShtSu IIF 1422602 $ 37,422 $ - $ - $ 37,422 300 N Cam late Street Recens I .23606 $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ 40,000 131 S Bi de B ass edestr 8416004 $ 42,833 $ - $ - $ 42,833 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000 Nei hborhood B a s IF 8422614 $ 104,500 $ - $ - $ 104,500 Transit Ca-Fr Trans Routes 1423608 $ 110,000 $ - $ - $ 110,000 Trans riationsa Im rov IF 8421500 $ 281,586 $ 125,893 $ 34,989 $ 120,704 Indiana Ave 900 S Rehab Design 1412002 $ 124:51 $ - $ - $ 124:593 Bikewa Urban Trails .1.003 $ 181,846 $ - $ - $ 181,846 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 $ 252,000 $ - $ - $ 252,000 Street Improve Reconshvc 20 8420125 $ 780,182 $ 11,688 $ 385,185 $ 383,309 IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ 625,000 Traffic Si nal U cades 141900' $ 450 $ - $ - $ 450 Traffic Si nalU cades .21501 $ .36,736 $ 55,846 $ 43,283 $ 737,607 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 $ 1:120000 $ - $ - $ 1,120,000 1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 $ 3111:331 $ 995,636 $ 144,072 $ 1,971,627 Grand Total $ 8,267,668 $ 1,301,595 $ 857,780 $ 6,108,293 Total $ 30,396,335 $ 3,802,601 $ 3,316,497 $ 23,277,237 $23,570,017 E=A+B+C+D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE Item 133 �''••�' �`�� "" MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst Public Hearing: May 2, 2023 DATE: May 2, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 — Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Item B-3 to tonight's Consent Agenda for action. Page I NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 5/16/23 City Match Number Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Total Funding Requested Required? of FTEs Grant Grant & Grant by Requested and FTE Amount 1. Yes. Source: CIP None Congestion Traffic synchronization Needs No $930,000 Utah Dept. CAN/ Fund Complete Mitigation and Air to minimize diversion of Public of Trans- Transporta- Streets Quality Program traffic onto local and Hearing portation tion Division residential streets by and and installing radar detection approval Wasatch equipment at 31 key on Front intersections. This grant Consent needs approval. It was Agenda. Regional applied for in 2017 and Council the City has received the funding. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council I Cindy Gust-Jenson,Jennifer Bruno,Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor I Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance I Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price,Sarah Behrens, Amy Dorsey,Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore Office of the City Attorney I Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community and Neighborhoods I Blake Thomas, Orion Goff,Jon Larsen, Kurt Larson, Kevin Young FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart e-W DATE: April 24, 2023 SUBJECT: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program I Salt Lake City Traffic Signal Synchronization - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Transportation and Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds GRANT PROGRAM: Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program Fiscal Year 2018-2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $930,000 (available in federal fiscal year 2023) DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhood I Division of Transportation COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: January 19, 2017 SPECIFICS: ❑ Equipment/Supplies Only ❑ Technical Assistance ❑ Provides Hourly Positions ❑ Existing ❑ New ❑ Overtime ❑ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: 0 Match Required $70,000 ❑ In-Kind Services and 0 Cash GRANT DETAILS: ■ Division of Transportation requested $930,000 for the Salt Lake City Traffic Signal Synchronization. ■ The aim is to minimize the diversion of traffic to local and residential streets by installing radar detection equipment at an estimated 31 key intersections. ■ The radar detection equipment synchronizes traffic signals and helps traffic signals better detect cyclists. ■ The source for the $70,000 cost share is the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Complete Streets. Item C1 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023,6:oo pm version RE: Text Amendment: Homeless Resource Centers/Shelters PLNPCM2022-oio68 MOTION i— adopt with Legislative Intent/Action and firearm section removal(Ordinance A) I move the Council adopt the ordinance subject to the following changes: • Remove the provision related to firearm signage and secure storage of firearms. • I further move the Council adopt the legislative intent and legislative action on page 2 of the motion sheet. Motion 2 adopt with Legislative Intent/Action and include firearm section included for privately owned HRCs/Shelters(Ordinance B) I move the Council adopt the ordinance subject to the following changes: • Specify that IF privately owned HRCs/Shelters prohibit firearms from within the building, they must provide signage at public entrances that firearms are not permitted and detection devices and provide secure storage while the individual is inside the HRC/Shelter. • I further move the Council adopt the legislative intent and legislative action on page 2 of the motion sheet. MOTION 3 1 move the Council defer action to a future council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION 4 I move the Council reject the ordinance. Legislative Intent and Legislative Action • I further move that the Council adopt a Legislative Intent to support the development of comprehensive and effective metrics aimed at assisting Homeless Resource Centers(HRCs)in demonstrating their impact on individuals experiencing homelessness and the communities hosting HRCs.The Council intends for the City to collaborate with stakeholders,including State and County officials and service providers,to establish a robust set of metrics that can accurately measure the success of HRCs. The Council further intends to assist with resources to facilitate data collection efforts for service providers,with the aim of improving data capture and analysis that will not be needlessly cumbersome for those capturing the data,and ultimately improve the understanding of the impact HRCs have on their clients in the communities where the facilities are located.This will help inform funding decisions and guide the allocation of resources towards programs that have been proven effective in addressing homelessness. • I further move the Council initiate a Legislative Action requesting the Administration research and develop a proposal to give the zoning administrator the ability to require and review CEPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)standards for other uses related to homeless services such as,but not limited to,charity dining halls,social service missions,some specialty housing COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY '%,nui %`````,• TO: City Council Members PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing:March 21,2023 FROM: Nick Tarbet,Policy Analyst Set Date:March 7,2023 DATE: May 2, 2023 Public Hearing:April 4,2023 Potential Action:May 2,2023 RE: Text Amendment: Homeless Resource Centers/Shelters PLNPCM2022-01o68 To follow this topic visit the following Council website NEW INFORMATION This was on the April 18 agenda for potential adoption. However,the Council moved to defer action to a future council meeting and requested staff provide a fact sheet that will clearly answer some of the questions Council Members and the community have about the proposed ordinance. Attachment A-Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment Fact Sheet outlines the questions some members of the Community and Councilmembers have raised.It was added to the project website and sent out to the email distribution list of people who expressed interest in the HRC text amendment. Legislative Intent/Action Council Members requested the following legislative intent/action be considered.They are included in motion#1 on the motion sheet. • Legislative Intent I move that the Council adopt a Legislative Intent to support the development of comprehensive and effective metrics aimed at assisting Homeless Resource Centers(HRCs)in demonstrating their impact on individuals experiencing homelessness and the communities hosting HRCs.The Council intends for the City to collaborate with stakeholders,including State and County officials and service providers,to establish a robust set of metrics that can accurately measure the success of HRCs. The Council further intends to assist with resources to facilitate data collection efforts for service providers,with the aim of improving data capture and analysis that will not be needlessly cumbersome for those capturing the data,and ultimately improve the understanding of the impact HRCs have on their clients on the communities where the facilities are located. This will help inform funding decisions and guide the allocation of resources towards programs that have been proven effective in addressing homelessness. • Legislative Action I move the Council initiate a zoning petition requesting the Administration research and develop a proposal to give the zoning administrator the ability to require and review CEPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)standards for other uses related to homeless services. The following information was provided for the April 18 formal meeting. It is provided again for background purposes Many individuals spoke during the April 4 public hearing. Several expressed concerns about the proposal due to the following reasons: service providers should do a better job running the HRCs,sanctioned camping sites should be allowed,some facilities are not safe enough to stay in,camp abatements are not helping,there is not enough space in the HRCs for all those who need a bed. Others were concerned that the proposed changes don't do enough to address the public nuisance issues that have occurred in the areas of existing HRCs, others suggested more reporting requirements are needed to address health and safety issues,and to help ensure the HRC model is successful for both clients and the community. The public hearing was closed, and action deferred to a future council meeting. In addition to the comments expressed during the public hearing,the Council received written comments with specific requests for changes to the ordinance(please see the outline below). At the time this report was submitted, staff had not received requests from four or more Council Members to make any of the changes requested by the public. This is on the April 18, 2023, agenda for potential action.If Council Members have requests for changes up and until the time this is discussed during the agenda,if there is sufficient support for those changes, action could be postponed,and staff could incorporate those changes for the next meeting on May 2. The following requests were submitted in writing for the Council to consider. Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness (SLVCEH) 1) Timeline: the proposed zoning map amendment application outlines a series of steps with the zoning amendment process taking between 6-12 months to complete. SLVCEH proposes a specific timeframe for the process with a total period limitation of 6-9 months in order to mitigate the challenges the applicant is navigating in purchasing real estate and securing financial resources.A zoning map amendment application without a timeframe will severely limit the ability of the project applicant in negotiating a purchase.This process needs to take into consideration all stakeholders including applicants and landowners. Page 12 2) Size: the proposed zoning map amendment application may only apply to facilities serving a capacity of over 4o and up to 200. SLVCEH recommends the zoning map amendment application be the process for facilities of all sizes,thereby expanding the relevant locations for a proposed facility. 3) Siting a Location: Clarity is needed regarding where HRCs can be sited. Potential applicants need information such as a map and/or specific guidance from the Planning Department as to where HRCs can be located prior to conversations with landowners and prior to the work of putting together a zoning application. Utah Solutions 1) Reporting Mechanism.Amend`Standards for Homeless Resource Centers,'A.2.a.(5) (Lines 114 through 123)to include: "(F) Failure to submit the annual written report on or before February 15th of each year may result in: i) a fine of not more than $5,000 per month, and ii) reconsideration of approval of the conditional use permit the following year should the annual written report be submitted after September 15th of each year. 2) Amend`Standards for Homeless Resource Centers,'A.2.a.(5) (Lines 114 through 123)to include: "(D)A summary of police reports derived from complaints from the community within i mile of a homeless resource center and ascribed to the operation of the homeless resource center; and" 3) Amend`Standards for Homeless Resource Centers,'A.3. (Lines 152 through 161)to include: "The applicant shall conduct a CPTED review or evaluation each year to address potential concerns and recommendations and implement the recommendations of the annual CPTED review.Any recommendations not implemented must be explained and reported in the annual report." 4) Amend`Standards for Homeless Resource Centers,'B.3.f. (Lines 220 through 225)to strike: "A secure storage area for a firearm for clients of the shelter but also clear policies to not collect information on the firearm while in storage at shelter.An abandonment plan if a firearm is left at the shelter for more than 7 days,process to relinquish to a law enforcement agency for disposal." And insert: "weapons"to read"Visible signage at all public entrances indicating that firearms and weapons are not permitted inside the homeless shelter.A means of detecting firearms and weapons at all public entrances..." Legislative Intent/Action Council Members requested the following legislative intent/action be considered.They are included in motion#i on the motion sheet. • Legislative Intent I move that the Council adopt a Legislative Intent to support the development of comprehensive and effective metrics aimed at assisting Homeless Resource Centers(HRCs)in demonstrating their impact on individuals experiencing homelessness and the communities hosting HRCs.The Council intends for the City to collaborate with stakeholders,including State Page 13 and County officials and service providers,to establish a robust set of metrics that can accurately measure the success of HRCs. The Council further intends to assist with resources to facilitate data collection efforts for service providers,with the aim of improving data capture and analysis that will not be needlessly cumbersome for those capturing the data,and ultimately improve the understanding of the impact HRCs have on their clients on the communities where the facilities are located. This will help inform funding decisions and guide the allocation of resources towards programs that have been proven effective in addressing homelessness. • Legislative Action I move the Council initiate a zoning petition requesting the Administration research and develop a proposal to give the zoning administrator the ability to require and review CEPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)standards for other uses related to homeless services. The following information was provided for the April 4 public hearing.It is provided again for background purposes New Information During the March 21 work session briefing the Council requested the following changes to the draft ordinance be made. Planning and the Attorney's Office updated the ordinance to reflect this direction. 1. Remove the 4o-bed/conditional use in zones with residential use as recommended by the Planning Commission. (Deleted from draft ordinance) 2. Add a requirement to report back to the Council after CEPTD review. (Page 2, lined 48-52) • Reporting Requirements after Overlay adoption: Council may consider budgetary assistance in meeting security needs identified by the provider or by the city which may impact the homeless resource center or its surroundings. Any needs identified after the CEPTED review or otherwise should be submitted to the City Council by February 15th of each calendar year. 3. Include a requirement to report on the effectiveness of CEPTED, Security plan. (Page 4, line 139-140) • A review and analysis of the CEPTED controls on site and the Security and operations plan identifying any deficiencies. 4. The Council will hold a public hearing within go days of receiving the transmittal, put on for action within a reasonable timeline after the public hearing (Page 1o, Lines 367-369) • G. City Council Hearing: The City Council shall schedule and hold a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment in accordance with the standards and procedures for Page 14 conduct of the public hearing set forth in chapter 21A.10, "General Application and Public Hearing Procedures", of this title within 90 days of receipt of the administration's Transmittal. • H. City Council Decision: Following the hearing, the City Council within a reasonable time frame may adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the proposed amendment with modifications, or deny the proposed amendment. However, no additional land may be zoned to a different classification than was contained in the public notice, and no land may be rezoned to a less restricted classification, without new notice and hearing. 5. Potential Legislative Action CEPTED - give zoning administrator ability to review CEPTED for other similar type uses to HRCs/Shelters. i. Because this is not within the scope of the petition, staff will prepare a legislative Action for the Council to consider adopting to initiate a petition. ii. Draft Legislative Intent 1. I move the Council initiate a zoning petition requesting the Administration research and develop a proposal to give the zoning administrator the ability to require and review CEPTED standards for other uses related to homeless services. Additionally, the Administration noted an additional change for the Council to consider including in the final ordinance. The one-mile suggestion is included because it is reflective the distance requirement for prioritized overflow shelters in state code (HB499 line 807). Is the Council supportive of making this change? Current proposal(page 13, line 447) 5. The proximity to other homeless resource centers. Consideration (to mirror prioritized winter overflow in state code) 5. The proximity is at least one mile from other homeless resource centers. The public hearing was set for April 4. The following information was provided for the March 21 work session briefing.It is provided again for background purposes ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The City Council will be briefed on a proposal that would establish a process for approving future Homeless Resource Centers(HRC),create a Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District,adopt provisions for temporary and seasonal homeless resource centers,modify existing standards for homeless resource centers(defined as up to 200 people)and homeless shelters and make other necessary changes.Seepages 3-5.for a detailed overview of the proposed process. Page 15 This petition was initiated by the City Council on March 22, 2022 through Ordinance 1.0 of 2022.That ordinance was adopted in conjunction with Ordinance 15A of 2022.Ordinance 15A removed HRCs/Shelters from the City's Land Use Tables. Ordinance 15B implemented a future date certain that HRC/Shelters would again be allowed in in the zones they were currently located(CG, D2 and DA unless it was repealed due to the preferred changes that were being drafted by Planning staff. If the Council does not adopt an updated ordinance by May 3, 2023,Ordinance 15B of 2022 will go into effect.This would return the city's zoning ordinance to the standards outlined in code prior to the mayor initiating changes to the HRC and Shelter sections of city code in October 2021. On March 7, 2023,the Council set the public hearing date for April 4, 2023. According to the transmittal letter(pages 1-2)the City Council provided guidance on identifying a new process to establish future HRCs/Shelters with the following project goals: • Safety and welfare of those experiencing homelessness in the city. • Impact to communities when HRCs and related services are concentrated. • Impact that future HRCs have on city services. • Financial ability of service providers to comply with regulations and still provide necessary shelter and/or services. • Identifying the impacts that are the responsibility of the operator of an HRC and those impacts that should be the responsibility of others. • Avoiding inequities in the locations of HRCs and homeless shelters. Planning staff notes this petition did not intend to include a recommendation for where future HRCs/Shelters would be allowed but creates a mechanism to allow one in almost any zone city-wide. Part of the analysis of a potential HRC/shelter includes comprehensive information and review of factors for decision maker consideration to ensure the goals(safety,community impacts,city service impacts,etc.) are achieved.Anyone seeking to open a facility would go through the map amendment process to apply. Essentially, all zones in the city,except for the Mi and M2,would be eligible for a facility. Pages 4-9 of the Planning Commission staff report discusses equity issues in locating future HRCs as well as potential options for an overlay. Section 3-Options outlines scenarios that could be considered when determining where to allow HRCs/Shelters in the city: • Authorizes the uses in certain zones. • Describes a geographic area of the city where the overlay would authorize the use. • Authorize the use in either of the ways listed above and add additional standards. Ultimately,the Planning Commission reviewed options but did not chose to forward a recommendation including them,they discussed and chose to recommend two other options to the Council. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council but included two recommendations in addition to the proposal from Planning.Both of these recommendations are included in the current draft of the ordinance.If the Council has concerns with/both, the Council could elect to remove them. • Homeless Resource Centers with up to 4o beds should be approved through the conditional use process in any zoning district with residential uses. (Staff note: This idea has not been vetted by Planning Staff) • The City Council expedite the review and approval of a requested HRC Overlay within 90 days of the recommendation of Planning Commission. Page 16 Staff note: The Planning Commission made these additional recommendations with the comment that the process outlined in the Planning Staff proposal may be onerous and time consuming. Those additional recommendations were made with the goal of expediting processes. Policy Questions • The Council may wish to consider if the proposed ordinance sufficiently addresses the legislative action adopted by the Council on March 22, 2022: o I further move the Council approve a Legislative Intent,urging the Administration to include in their review process for Parts 2 and 3 of the HRC/Shelter text amendment petition,recommendations to promote geographic equity of HRCs/Shelters by expanding the zoning districts where they are allowed in the city. • The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how recent changes to state legislation impacts this proposal. • Some Council Members have raised questions about allowing existing HRC/Shelters additional flexibility to increase their maximum occupancy throughout the year or during extreme weather conditions. ■ Existing HRC/Shelters had a maximum occupancy of 200 individuals approved through the conditional use approvals. ■ The draft ordinance retains the maximum occupancy of 200 individuals through the overlay adoption process. o Considering the addition of allowing temporary shelters with the draft proposal,does the Council wish to consider other circumstances that could be included in City ordinance to give flexibility to the maximum occupancy of the existing HRCs? • Does the Council support including the two additional recommendations provided by the Planning Commission? o Homeless Resource Centers with up to 4o beds would be approved through the conditional use process in any zoning district with residential uses. ■ Planning staff noted in the Transmittal letter they have not had the opportunity to research any anticipated impacts related to HRCs with an occupancy of 40 people. This may have unintended consequences that are unknown at this time.(Transmittal Letter,Page 4) ■ Additionally, some community groups have contacted Council Members expressing concerns about this proposal. They state that 40 is an arbitrary and too large of a potential occupancy; they have asked the Council to reject this proposal due to the impact it may have on communities and neighborhoods. • This language is in the draft ordinance the Council is considering. o The City Council expedite the review and approval of a requested HRC Overlay within go days of the recommendation of Planning Commission. • This language is in the draft ordinance the Council is considering. Process of Proposed Zoning Amendment Any future HRC or emergency shelter would require a zoning map amendment to apply the overlay.Once the HRC Overlay is mapped,a new HRC would be a permitted use. Page 17 • A service provider would be required to submit a zoning map amendment application.This process requires a 45-day public input period, and at least one public hearing with the Planning Commission and a public hearing with the City Council. • This proposal includes a mandatory timeline associated with scheduling of public hearings with the Planning Commission to streamline the approval process. • In addition to the condensed timeline,staff integrated a requirement that the service provider must conduct engagement with individuals experiencing homelessness. • The public notification to property owners and tenants was increased from 300'to 450'to ensure that the broader community is informed of future HRC requests. Page 3 of the December 14, 2022, Planning Commission staff reports includes the following chart that shows the process for the proposed HRC overlay amendment: Proposed Process OVERLAY ZONE PROCESS Zoning Map Amendment Application 45 Days of Public Input Department Input Planning Commission Hearing City Council Public Hearing / Approval I Building Permit • The request to map the proposed HRC Overlay would require the applicant to submit the following information: (page 2, Transmittal Letter) 1. Development plans must meet the requirements of Chapter 21A.58 and the following additional detail: ■ The plans shall include all labels for the function of each room or space,both indoor and outdoor,proposed for the facility. ■ All information that demonstrates compliance with the requirements in 21A.36.350. 2. The maximum total human occupancy the proposed facility is intended to serve. 3. A detailed list of all anticipated supportive services to be offered on the property,including a description of each service,where the service will be on the property and the square footage of the area designated for each service. 4. Any anticipated funding requests made to the city to operate the facility. • City Departments will be required to compile the following information within 3o days of an application submittal: (pages 2-3, Transmittal Letter) 1. Information regarding the impact to the police department which may include any data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resource centers located in the city,the estimated cost of providing service by the police department to existing homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the police department to provide services to other parts of the city. 2. Information regarding the impact to the fire department which may include any data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resource centers located in the city and the estimated cost of providing service by the fire department to existing homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the fire department to provide services to other parts of the city. 3. Information regarding the number of civil enforcement cases associated with existing homeless resource centers,including the types of complaints,and the estimated impact to civil enforcement workloads and ability to provide services to other parts of the city. 4. Information regarding accessibility of the site and its impact on Public Services. 5. The city provides an updated website to provide all city departments to contact for various complaints such as graffiti,encampment clean up, enforcement issues,and any other identified city service that may address impacts on the neighborhood from HRCs. 6. Data provided by the State Homeless Management Information System and the SL Valley Coalition to End Homelessness regarding similar uses in Salt Lake County,including the total number of facilities,the total number of people who use the facilities,the number of individuals served with overnight tenancy in each facility,the average percentage of occupancy of the facilities,and the number of nights per year that the other facilities are at capacity to the extent that the information is available. 7. Data regarding the total number of beds available to people experiencing homelessness and the estimated number of people experiencing homelessness to the extent that the information is available. • Specific factors were developed for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider when reviewing a proposed overlay amendment: 1. The anticipated benefits to people experiencing homelessness provided by the facility in the proposed location. 2. The proximity of support services that benefit people who may use the facility and the ability of people to access services from the proposed location. If services are not within walking distance of the proposed facility,consideration of a transportation plan connecting support services to the facility. Page 19 3. The ratio of homeless related services provided in Salt Lake City compared to other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County. 4. The anticipated impact to city services,including fire,police, and any other city department that would be involved in providing services to the facility and the impact,if any,to the city providing services in other parts of the city. 5. The proximity to other homeless resource centers. 6. The effectiveness of the security and operations plan provided by the petitioner to address impacts created by the homeless resource center. 7. Equity between different neighborhoods in providing HRCs and other locations of impactful land uses. High impact land uses are those land uses that produce higher levels of pollution than the permitted uses in the underlying zone,and uses that attract crime or produce public nuisances,and land uses that located by a government entity or authorized by a government entity,that is not subject to the land use regulations of the city. 8. Demonstrated compliance with the requirements of 21A.36.350. • The proposed ordinance specifically states the City Council may consider entering into a development agreement with the applicant to"address any benefit or impact that a proposed homeless resource center may have on the surroundings of the proposed location of the overlay." Vicinity Maps Attachment B of the Planning Commission staff report included six maps that showed the location of existing HRCs,Shelters and homeless services in the city. It also includes a vicinity map for each of the existing HRCs,showing related services and shelters within one mile of each HRC/shelter. (December 14,2022,Planning Commission Staff Report,page 27) Page I io lot • ` ' a ■ 9009 P" Legend \ 9 Ons • lur 1 u.tk.n frtnkynwd wvlrw — \ _ � O R' ,n � fp • .MInnIwMw. M(•01/f•. O � o OMn6ir NlwitM �. «q w4l South - - 14.WV Law . aaf •�♦ •a Iy*d$Wlk. 0 nie Ydbn l - fA�•�,�h,� Cw1ya1LR�IM/,61f6,uM1� crrR{K1ERE,9annlaS/r6rMRtirsi6rlwY�a W!•4w O UsiML W Inch IY suswallan/MrfM616tY1►11s� L.Mick-e-I&VI Valli try Temporary HRCs/Shelters • Temporary HRCs/Shelters are allowed if shelters in the city are at full capacity during times when temperatures are expected to drop below 32 degrees,or the heat index is above 95 degrees Fahrenheit. • A temporary shelter may be allowed in an existing building if has adequate restrooms,meets building/fire codes, a security/operations plan is submitted,and the facility meets on of the following: o is located in a zoning district that allows hotels,motels,or multi-family; o is owned by a government entity regardless of underlying zoning; or o was constructed as a hotel,motel,or other temporary lodging purpose. • A temporary shelter must also meet spacing requirement from other facilities,but those may be waived or reduced by the director of community and neighborhoods. • A temporary HRC/Shelter may only occupy a site once every four years. Public Process A summary of the public process is outlined on page 4 of the Transmittal Letter.It included a series of stakeholder meetings and focus groups with community council chairs,service providers,people experiencing homelessness and advocates,and the business community. Council Public Engagement Page 11 A project website for the public to follow this issue has been posted on the Council Website. It will be updated as new information becomes available. Staff included information on this petition in the email updates and social media and sent out an email blast to stakeholders,with the days and times for the work session briefing and public hearing and links to the website. Page 112 4.27.2023 Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment Fact Sheet • Why does the City believe these changes were necessary?Are they an improvement over the previous ordinance? o These changes would allow the City to evaluate various factors when considering a location for an HRC or shelter.Those factors include impacts to safety,immediate neighborhoods (residents and businesses), and City services. o The additional evaluation is in response to impacts other HRC locations have had on the community, as well as feedback the Council received from residents, service providers, and people experiencing homelessness. The previous process did not take as many factors into consideration as what is being proposed. o Additionally, the proposed process allows potential HRCs in more zones around the city which could discourage the clustering of HRCs in a single area within the city. • What did the Council do with the Planning Commission Recommendations? o The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council with two additional recommendations: ■ Homeless Resource Centers with up to 40 beds should be approved through the conditional use process in any zoning district with residential uses. ■ The City Council expedite the review and decision of a requested HRC Overlay within 90 days of the Planning Commission recommendation. o During its March 21,2023,briefing the Council directed staff to remove the 40-bed recommendation from the final ordinance. o Instead of expediting the review,the Council supported requiring a public hearing to be held within 90 days of receiving the transmittal.And consider voting within a reasonable timeline after the public hearing. • Does this change where HRCs are allowed? o Yes. Prior to the Council approving a temporary hold on allowing new homeless shelters in the city in 2022, shelters were only allowed in General Commercial (CG),Downtown Support District (D2), and Downtown Warehouse/Residential District (D3). Under this new process,HRCs/Shelters would be allowed in all zones except for the Light Manufacturing (M1) and Heavy Manufacturing (M2) zones. o The city would review several factors regarding a potential HRC/Shelter site for decision-makers to consider. The comprehensive analysis will ensure potential community impacts are considered during planning stages. 4.27.2023 • How will future Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) be permitted? o The proposed process for permanent shelters would require a zoning map amendment and compliance with HRC standards including Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). o This process would also apply to any facility with up to 200 beds—the City-designated maximum size for an HRC. Proposed Overlay Zone Process Zoning Map Amendment Application 1 45 Day of Public Input 1 Department Input I Planning Commission Public Hearing 1 City- Council Public Hearing / Decision 1 Building Permit • What changes to the ordinance has the Council made? o Added requirement to report back to the Council after the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) review. o Included a requirement to report on the effectiveness of CPTED and the Security and Operations Plan. o The Council will hold a public hearing within 90 days of receiving the proposal and will consider voting within a reasonable timeline after the public hearing. 4.27.2023 • Is the City required to allow firearms to be stored in an HRC? o Per state law, a city may prohibit firearms from a city owned/operated HRC, but if they are prohibited, the facility must provide secure storage for them. • 53-5a-103.5. Firearm regulation in homeless shelters: https://Ie.utah.gov/xcode/Title53/Chal2ter5A/53-5a- S103.5.htmPv=C53-5a-S103.5 2022050420220504 • To understand the impact HRCs may have on the surrounding neighborhoods, the Council indicated a desire for additional data to be collected in areas near HRCs. o As part of the potential adoption of the changes, the Council is considering adopting a legislative intent to develop key metrics with the collaboration of stakeholders,including State and County officials and service providers. o These metrics would help measure the success of HRCs in assisting individuals experiencing homelessness and their communities. Collaborative efforts would help equip service providers with resources that facilitate data collection. o The data captured would be instrumental in informing funding decisions and could guide allocation of resources towards effective homelessness programs. • Are the annual reports submitted to the City available to the public? o The draft ordinance requires all reports to be posted on the City's website. HRC annual reports are available to the public at www.slc.gov/planning/reports/hres-reports/ • What does the Security and Operations Plan require? o A community relations and complaint response program to maintain clean and orderly premises, minimize potential conflicts with neighboring properties and businesses, and prohibit unlawful behavior by HRC occupants. o The plan also requires a representative to meet with neighbors upon request,a 24-hour complaint line, quarterly meetings with a community coordinating group, on-site security,noise level maintenance, designated smoking areas, and visible signage prohibiting firearms on the premises. • What are HRCs required to report? o A list of individuals who have participated in the community coordinating group meetings, o A summary of each community coordinating group meeting, o A summary of complaints received by the operator of the HRC o An explanation of how complaints have been addressed. o A review and analysis of the CPTED controls on site and the security and operations plan identifying any deficiencies. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, Adopting standards pertaining to Temporary Homeless Resource Centers,Amending the zoning text of Section 21A.36.350 and Chapter 21A.50 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Homeless Resource Centers and Development Agreements, and Amending definitions in Title 2 1 A associated with the foregoing) An ordinance adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, adopting standards pertaining to Temporary Homeless Resource Centers, amending the zoning text of Section 21A.36.350 and Chapter 21A.50 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Homeless Resource Centers and Development Agreements, and amending definitions in Title 2 1 A associated with the foregoing all pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-01068. WHEREAS, on December 14, 2022,the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning Commission") held a public hearing on a petition submitted by the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council")to amend land use regulations pertaining to homeless resource centers (Petition No. PLNPCM2022-01068); and WHEREAS, at its December 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: SECTION I. Adopting Section 21A.34.160. That Section 21A.34.160 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 21A.34.160: HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT Purpose: The intent of the overlay is to consider the safety and welfare of those experiencing homelessness while considering the impact to city services and adjacent neighborhoods and minimize the effects on neighborhoods and populations that have traditionally been marginalized when considering locations for future homeless resource centers. A. Applicability: The process and regulations found in this chapter apply to all homeless resource centers existing prior to January 1, 2023 and any proposed homeless resource centers mapped within the city. This overlay is prohibited in the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. B. Applying to Zoning Map: A petition to apply this overlay shall be subject to the applicable provisions of Chapter 21A.50. 1. A homeless resource center shall only be allowed if located within the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District or as otherwise allowed by this title. 2. City Council Action: In deciding to apply this overlay, the city council may consider a development agreement to address any benefit or impact that a proposed homeless resource center may have on the surroundings of the proposed location of the overlay. 3. Permitted Use: If approved by the city council, a homeless resource center shall be a permitted use within the boundary of the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 4. Reporting Requirements After Overlay Adoption: The city council may consider budgetary assistance in meeting security needs identified by the provider or by the city which may impact the homeless resource center or its surroundings. Any needs identified after the CPTED review or otherwise should be submitted to the city council by February 15th of each calendar year. C. Previously Approved Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters: An existing homeless resource center or homeless shelter that was approved as a conditional use prior to January 1, 2023 shall be subject to the specifics of the conditional use approval, and any subsequent modification to the approval, that were placed on the use at the time of approval, and subject to the following modification limitations: 1. Modifications to prior conditional use approval. A modification to a prior conditional use shall be subject to Section 21A.54.135. 2. Any proposed modification to an existing homeless resource center that would increase the gross floor area by either 25% or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less, may only be allowed if the city council approves a zoning map amendment applying the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District to the property on which the existing homeless resource center is located and the requirements of that overlay district are met. D. Applicability to Places of Worship. A place of worship is not required to petition for a zoning map amendment to apply this overlay provided any emergency shelter provided is part of the ecclesiastic function of the place of worship. A place of worship that provides 2 emergency shelter to people experiencing homelessness shall comply with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350. E. Complying With Standards. Any existing or proposed homeless resource center or homeless shelter shall comply with the applicable provisions of this title, including but not limited to the requirements of the underlying zoning district and Section 21A.36.350. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.350. That Section 21A.36.350 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.36.350: STANDARDS FOR HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS: A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter may be allowed pursuant to Chapter 21A.34 of this title and the requirements of this section. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the following regulations. Any homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a conditional use shall comply with these regulations and the requirements of the approved conditional use. The owner of the property where a homeless resource center or homeless shelter is located shall ensure that the operator complies with the requirements of this chapter. 1. Capacity Limit: a maximum of two hundred(200)unsheltered persons. 2. Security and Operations Plan. A plan shall be prepared by the applicant, and approved by the Salt Lake City Police Department and Division of Community and Neighborhoods, and filed with the Salt Lake City Recorder's Office. A security and operations plan shall include: a. A community relations and complaint response program that identifies specific strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring properties, and prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site. The community relations and complaint response program shall include at least the following elements: (1) Identify a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, including the representative's name,telephone number, and email, who will meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any complaints regarding operation of the center; (2) A dedicated 24 hour telephone line for the purpose of receiving complaints; (3) Quarterly meetings with a community coordinating group,which shall be open to the public, to discuss and address concerns and issues that may be occurring as a result of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter operation. The operator may establish policies and procedures for the 3 meetings, including rules of decorum. The meetings shall be advertised at least 10 days in advance by posting notice on the operator's website and a sign posted along the public street; (4) Representatives from each of the following shall be included in the community coordinating group: (A)The homeless resource center or homeless shelter; (B)A business located within 1/4 mile of the site; (C)A resident who lives within 1/4 mile of the site; (D)A school, if any, located within 1/4 mile of the site; (E) Chair of the community council, or designee, whose boundary encompasses the site; (F) An individual who has previously received or is currently receiving services (i.e., client) from a homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and (5) A written annual report,provided on or before February 15th of each year, from the operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, provided to the planning director,which shall be posted to the planning division website and which shall include the following information: (A)List of individuals who have participated in the community coordinating group meetings; (B)A summary of each community coordinating group meeting; (C)A summary of complaints received from the community by the operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and (D)An explanation of how complaints have been addressed/resolved. (E)A review and analysis of the CPTED controls on site and the security and operations plan identifying any deficiencies. b. A complaint response community relations program that includes strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring property, and prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site or adjacent public right-of-way. c. A provision requiring a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter to meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any neighborhood complaints regarding operation of the center; 4 d. A requirement for continuous on-site security,which includes professional security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency responders, and emergency alert systems. e. A plan to maintain noise levels in compliance with Chapter 9.28 of this code; f. Design requirements that ensure any areas for client queuing take place strictly within an enclosed building; g. Designation of a location for smoking tobacco outdoors in conformance with State laws; h. A provision stating that any trash on the premises be collected and deposited in a trash receptacle by 6:00 A.M. the following day; i. A provision stating that portable trash receptacles on the premises be emptied daily and that other receptacles be emptied at a minimum of once per week or as needed. j. Designation of an indoor location within the site where emergency services can easily and privately provide necessary services to clients. 3. The applicant shall provide building and site plans that have been reviewed by a certified CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)professional credentialed by the International Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Association or similar organization. The CPTED professional shall indicate that the plans comply with CPTED principles and be approved by the Salt Lake City Police Department. The police department may recommend modification to the plans to improve the safety of the site to the zoning administrator. The zoning administrator is authorized to allow modifications to the zoning regulations listed in this section in order to improve the safety of the site when the recommended modification is not permitted by the zoning ordinance. Modifications shall be limited to the following: a. Fence height and fence design; b. Landscaping; c. Clear view distances at driveways; d. Design standards when necessary to provide privacy for the operation of the homeless resource center. 4. Maintenance: a. The building and site must be maintained free from graffiti, litter, garbage, and other items that constitute a nuisance; b. The building must be maintained in good repair and all property damage is repaired in a timely manner; 5 c. All fencing, walls, paving, walkways and other site features must be maintained in good repair, and free from obstruction. 5. Building and Zoning Compliance: A homeless resource center or homeless shelter shall comply with all applicable building and zoning regulations. B. Standards for Homeless Resource Centers (Temporary) 1. When Allowed: A homeless resource center(temporary) is allowed if the following situations are present in the city: a. The existing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the city are at full capacity or are likely to be at full capacity due to temperatures dropping below 32 degrees or heat index above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is reasonably expected; or b. The city is required to provide emergency shelter by applicable state laws. 2. Location: A homeless resource center(temporary)may be located in existing buildings within the city i£ a. The building proposed for a homeless resource center(temporary) complies with one of the following: (1) is located in a zoning district that allows hotels, motels, or multi-family dwellings; (2) is owned by a government entity regardless of underlying zoning; or (3) was constructed as a hotel, motel, or other temporary lodging purpose. b. The site contains permanent or temporary restrooms adequate for the determined occupancy load. c. The building complies with or can comply with applicable building and fire codes deemed necessary by city officials who are qualified to make such a determination. d. The building complies with the spacing requirements as may be required in Utah Code Section 35A-16-502 regulating separation requirements or its successor. 3. Security and Operations Plan: The operator of the facility provides the city with a security and operations plan that includes: a. Contact information for a 24 hour property manager who has responsibility for administering the security and operations plan and addressing nuisances or compliance issues required by applicable laws. The contact info must be clearly posted on the site and legible to passers-by. 6 b. A description of the intake process for those that may be using the facility that can occur entirely within the building or on the property in a manner that does not impact public sidewalks. c. Designated smoking areas on the property that are located in areas that comply with applicable laws and are at least 30 feet from a property line. d. A property maintenance plan to ensure that the property is maintained free of litter and any waste. e. A vicinity maintenance plan to ensure that the properties and public space within 660 feet of the property where the facility is located are free from any litter or waste and that requires the facility operator to respond to requests from property owners or occupants of the properties within 660 feet to remove any waste, including sanitization when necessary, that can be attributed to the occupants of the facility. f. Provisions that address ingress and egress to the site. The zoning administrator may require features such as fences to regulate egress and ingress to the site. g. A requirement for continuous on-site security which include professional security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency responders, and emergency alert systems. 4. Temporary Land Use Regulations: The city council may approve any homeless resource center(temporary)utilizing temporary land use approval authority prescribed under current laws. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.50.030. That Section 21A.50.350 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21 A.50.03 0: INITIATION: Amendments to the text of this title or to the zoning map may be initiated by filing an application for an amendment addressed to the planning commission. Applications for amendments may be initiated by the mayor, the city council, the planning commission, or the owner of the property included in the application, or the property owner's authorized agent. Applications related to H Historic Preservation Overlay Districts or landmark sites or the Homeless Resource Center Overlay shall be initiated as provided in Chapter 21A.34 of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.50.040. That Section 21A.50.040 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 7 21A.50.040: PROCEDURE: An amendment to the text of this title or to the zoning map initiated by any of the methods described in Section 21A.50.030 of this chapter shall be processed in accordance with the following procedures: A. Application: An application shall be made to the zoning administrator on a form or forms provided by the office of the zoning administrator, which shall include at least the following information: 1. A statement of the text amendment or map amendment describing the purpose for the amendment and the exact language,boundaries and zoning district; 2. Street address and legal description of the property; 3. A complete description of the proposed use of the property where appropriate; 4. Site plans drawn to scale (where applicable); and 5. Related materials or data supporting the application as may be determined by the applicant and the zoning administrator. B. Fees: The application shall be accompanied by the applicable fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible for payment of all fees established for providing the public notice required by Chapter 21A.10 of this title. Application and noticing fees filed by the city council,planning commission or the mayor shall not be required. Application and noticing fees filed for designation within an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or to establish a character conservation district shall not be required. C. Determination of Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for an amendment, the zoning administrator shall make a determination of completeness pursuant to Section 21A.10.010, "General Application Procedures", of this title. D. Staff Report: A staff report evaluating the amendment application shall be prepared by the planning director and shall contain at least the following information: 1. An analysis of any factors to be considered found in this title. 2. A discussion regarding input received from the public. 3. Input from other city departments or entities who have provided comments related to the proposal. E. Planning Commission Public Hearing: The planning commission shall schedule and hold a public hearing on the completed application in accordance with the standards and procedures for conduct of the public hearing set forth in Chapter 2 IA.10, "General Application and Public Hearing Procedures", of this title. The following provisions apply for petitions to amend the zoning map that are requesting to applying the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District: 8 1. The planning commission may hold a public hearing during the required 45-day public notification period required in Section 2.60.050 of the Salt Lake City Code for zoning map amendments to apply the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. No recommendation shall be made by the planning commission during the 45-day notification period. 2. During the 45-day public notification period, the petitioner shall arrange an opportunity for people who are experiencing homelessness to provide input on the proposed location of the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 3. Notice of the public hearing shall be sent via first class mail to property owners and tenants within 450 feet of the proposed boundaries of the petition to map the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 4. The petition shall be scheduled for a recommendation from the planning commission at the first regularly scheduled commission meeting following the end of the 45-day notification period. F. Planning Commission Decision: Following the public hearing, the planning commission shall recommend approval or denial of the proposed amendment or the approval of some modification of the amendment and shall then submit its recommendation to the city council. G. City Council Hearing: The city council shall schedule and hold a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment in accordance with the standards and procedures for conduct of the public hearing set forth in Chapter 21A.10, "General Application and Public Hearing Procedures", of this title within 90 days of receipt of the administration's transmittal. H. City Council Decision: Following the hearing, the city council within a reasonable time frame may adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the proposed amendment with modifications, or deny the proposed amendment. However, no additional land may be zoned to a different classification than was contained in the public notice, and no land may be rezoned to a less restricted classification, without new notice and hearing. SECTION 5. Adopting Section 21A.50.055. That Section 21A.50.055 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is adopted to read as follows: 21A.50.055: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS APPLYING THE HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT. A. Applicability. Any proposal to consider a petition that involves a zoning map amendment to apply the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District shall be subject to the additional requirements of this section in addition to any other requirement of this title. 9 B. Additional Submittal Requirements. In addition to the application requirements of this chapter, the following information shall be provided by the person submitting a zoning amendment petition that includes applying the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 1. Development plans meeting the requirements of Chapter 21A.58 and the following additional detail: a. The plans shall include all labels for the function of each room or space,both indoor and outdoor,proposed for the facility. b. All information that demonstrates compliance with the requirements in Section 21A.36.350. 2. The maximum total human occupancy the proposed facility is intended to serve. 3. A detailed list of all the anticipated supportive services to be offered on the property, including a description of each service, where the service will be on the property and the square footage of the area designated for each service. 4. Any anticipated funding requests made to the city to operate the facility. C. Information Provided by the City. After a complete application has been submitted to apply this overlay to property within the boundaries of the city, applicable city departments shall provide the planning division with the following information within 30 days: 1. Information regarding the impact to the police department which may include any data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resources centers located in the city, the estimated cost of providing service by the police department to existing homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the police department to provide services to other parts of the city. 2. Information regarding the impact to the fire department which may include any data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resources centers located in the city and the estimated cost of providing service by the fire department to existing homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the fire department to provide services to other parts of the city. 3. Information regarding the number of civil enforcement cases associated with existing homeless resource centers, including the types of complaints, and the estimated impact to civil enforcement workloads and ability to provide services to other parts of the city. 4. Information regarding accessibility of the site and its impact on public services. 10 5. The city provides an updated website to provide any and all city departments to contact for various complaints such as graffiti, encampment clean up, enforcement issues, and any other identified city service that may address impacts on the neighborhood from homeless resource centers. 6. Data provided by the State Homeless Management Information System and the SL Valley Coalition to end homelessness regarding similar uses in Salt Lake County, including the total number of facilities, the total number of people who use the facilities, the number of individuals served with overnight tenancy in each facility, the average percentage of occupancy of the facilities, and the number of nights per year that the other facilities are at capacity to the extent that the information is available. 7. Data regarding the total number of beds available to people experiencing homelessness and the estimated number of people currently experiencing homelessness to the extent that the information is available. D. Additional Factors to Consider: In making a decision regarding a petition to map the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, the planning commission and city council shall consider the following factors, in addition to those factors identified elsewhere in Chapter 21A.50: 1. The anticipated benefits to people experiencing homelessness provided by the facility in the proposed location. 2. The proximity of support services that benefit people who may use the facility and the ability of people to access services from the proposed location. If services are not within walking distance of the proposed facility, consideration of a transportation plan connecting support services to the facility. 3. The ratio of homeless related services provided in Salt Lake City compared to other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County. 4. The anticipated impact to city services, including fire,police, and any other city department that would be involved in providing services to the facility and the impact, if any, to the city providing services in other parts of the city. 5. The proximity is at least a mile from other homeless resource centers. 6. The effectiveness of the security and operations plan provided by the petitioner to address impacts created by the homeless resource center. 7. Equity between different neighborhoods in providing homeless resource centers and other locations of impactful land uses. High impact land uses are those land uses that produce higher levels of pollution than the permitted uses in the underlying zone, land uses that attract crime or produce public nuisances, and land uses that are located by a government entity or authorized by a government entity and that are not subject to the land use regulations of the city. 11 8. Demonstrated compliance with the requirements of Section 21A.36.350. SECTION 6. Adopting Section 21A.50.065. That Section 21A.50.080 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 21A.50.065: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. The city council may consider applying requirements through an appropriate legal agreement with a petition for a zoning amendment when the city council determines that such an agreement is necessary to increase the benefit of the proposed zoning amendment and/or to address potential impacts to city services, surrounding land uses,public safety, and the health of current and future residents, business owners, and visitors to the city. The agreement may modify any applicable requirement of this title provided the modification was proposed to and considered by the planning commission as required for any zoning amendment. Agreements that constrain the development potential or land uses of the subject property compared to what is authorized in the proposed zoning district are not required to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to consideration of the agreement. SECTION T Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.020. That Section 21A.60.020 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended to add the following term, which shall be inserted in alphabetical order: Homeless Resource Center(Temporary) SECTION 8. Amendiniz the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That definitions of the terms "Homeless Resource Center" and"Homeless Shelter"be amended as set forth below and the term"Homeless Resource Center(Temporary)"be added to Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code,which shall be inserted in alphabetical order and shall read as follows: HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: A building or portion thereof which contains sleeping facilities for those experiencing homeless and operates year round. The facility may contain related services such as bathing, eating, laundry facilities, housing case management, medical care and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational instruction, and/or vocational training as defined in Utah State Code or its successor. HOMELESS SHELTER: See the definition of Homeless Resource Center. HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER(Temporary): A building or portion thereof which contains sleeping facilities for no more than 150 people per night experiencing homelessness 12 and operates for no more than 180 consecutive days or a total of 180 days in a calendar year between October 1 and April 30th of the following year. The facility may contain related services such as bathing, eating, laundry facilities, housing case management, medical care and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational instruction, and/or vocational training as defined in Utah State Code or its successor. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Bill No. of 2023. Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Published: Date, April 28, 2023 Ordinance adopting HRC Overlay(final) By: WL Katherine D.Pasker,Senior City Attorney 13 I SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2023 3 4 (Adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, Adopting standards pertaining to 5 Temporary Homeless Resource Centers, Amending the zoning text of Section 21A.36.350 and 6 Chapter 21A.50 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Homeless Resource Centers and 7 Development Agreements, and Amending definitions in Title 2 1 A associated with the foregoing) 8 9 An ordinance adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, adopting 10 standards pertaining to Temporary Homeless Resource Centers, amending the zoning text of 11 Section 21A.36.350 and Chapter 21A.50 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Homeless 12 Resource Centers and Development Agreements, and amending definitions in Title 2 1 A 13 associated with the foregoing all pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-01068. 14 WHEREAS, on December 14, 2022, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission ("Planning 15 Commission") held a public hearing on a petition submitted by the Salt Lake City Council("City 16 Council") to amend land use regulations pertaining to homeless resource centers (Petition No. 17 PLNPCM2022-01068); and 18 WHEREAS, at its December 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 19 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and 20 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 21 adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. 22 NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 23 SECTION 1. Adopting Section 21A.34.160. That Section 21A.34.160 of the Salt Lake 24 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 25 21A.34.160: HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT 26 Purpose: The intent of the overlay is to consider the safety and welfare of those experiencing 27 homelessness while consideringthe he impact to city services and adjacent neighborhoods and LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 28 minimize the effects on neijzhborhoods and populations that have traditionally 29 marginalized when considering locations for future homeless resource centers. 30 A. Applicability: The process and regulations found in this chapter apply to all homeless 31 resource centers existing priorto January 1, 2023 and any proposed homeless resource 32 centers mapped within the city. This overlay is prohibited in the M-1 and M-2 zoning 33 districts. 34 35 B. Applying to Zoning Map: A petition to apply this overlay shall be subject to the 36 applicable provisions of Chapter 21A.50. 37 38 1. A homeless resource center shall only be allowed if located within the Homeless 39 Resource Center Overlay District or as otherwise allowed by this title. 40 2. City Council Action: In deciding to apply this overlay, the city council may consider 41 a development agreement to address any benefit or impact that a proposed homeless 42 resource center may have on the surroundings of the proposed location of the overla. 43 3. Permitted Use: If approved by the city council, a homeless resource center shall be a 44 permitted use within the boundary of the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 45 4. Reporting Requirements After Overlay Adoption: The city council may consider 46 budgetary assistance in meeting security needs identified by the provider or by the 47 city which may impact the homeless resource center or its surroundings. An. needs 48 identified after the CPTED review or otherwise should be submitted to the city 49 council by February 151h of each calendar year. 50 51 C. Previously pproved Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters: An existing 52 homeless resource center or homeless shelter that was approved as a conditional use prior 53 to January 1, 2023 shall be subject to the specifics of the conditional use approval, and 54 any subsequent modification to the approval, that were placed on the use at the time of 55 approval, and subject to the following modification limitations: 56 57 1. Modifications to prior conditional use approval. A modification to a prior conditional 58 use shall be subject to Section 21A.54.135. 59 2. Any proposed modification to an existing homeless resource center that would 60 increase the ,gross floor area by either 25% or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less, 61 may only be allowed if the city council approves a zoning map amendment applying 62 the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District to the property on which the existing 63 homeless resource center is located and the requirements of that overlay district are 64 met. 65 66 D. Applicability to Places of Worship. A place of worship is not required to petition for a 67 zoning map amendment to apply this overlay provided any emergency shelter provided is 68 part of the ecclesiastic function of the place of worship. A place of worship that provides 2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 69 emergency shelter to people experiencing homelessness shall comply with the provisions 70 of Section 21A.36.350. 71 72 E. Complying With Standards. Any existing or proposed homeless resource center or 73 homeless shelter shall comply with the applicable provisions of this title, including but 74 not limited to the requirements of the underlyingzoning oning district and Section 21A.36.350. 75 76 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.350. That Section 21A.36.350 of 77 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 78 21A.36.350: REGULATIONS STANDARDS FOR HOMELESS RESOURCE 79 CENTERS AND HOMELESS SHELTERS: 80 A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter may be allowed pursuant to Chapter 81 21A.34 of this title and the requirements of this section. A homeless resource center or 82 homeless shelter located within the city shall comply with the following regulations. Any 83 homeless resource center or homeless shelter approved as a conditional use shall comply 84 with these regulations and the requirements of the approved conditional use. The owner 85 of the property where a homeless resource center or homeless shelter is located shall 86 ensure that the operator complies with the requirements of this chapter. 87 1. Capacity Limit: the number-of homeless per-sons who may oeeupy a homeless 88 resource o-*o, f r overnight accommodations*^ a maximum of two hundred(200) 89 ,unsheltered persons. 91 92 aeeefflffl-od-atiefls for-any reason, ineluding on an ever-flow basis. 93 2. Security and Operations Plan. A seeu.;*., ^a epee- tiMs-plan shall be prepared by the 94 applicant, and approved by the Salt Lake City Police Department and Division of 95 Community and Neighborhoods DepaA.nent, ffiff*^ ^ ^a�*�^r�' o appr-oval, and 96 filed with the Salt Lake City Recorder's Office. A security and operations plan shall 97 include: 98 a. A community relations and complaint response program that identifies specific 99 strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly 100 condition, minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of 101 neighboring propertiesy, and prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the 102 homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site or-adjaeent publie right 103 may. The community relations and complaint response program shall include 104 at least the following elements: 3 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 105 (1) Identify a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, 106 including the representative's name, telephone number, and email,who will 107 meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any neighbor-hood 108 complaints regarding operation of the center; 109 (2) A dedicated tweet-,f (24)hour telephone line for the purpose of receiving 110 complaints; 111 (3) Quarterly meetings with a community coordinating group, which shall be 112 open to the public, to discuss and address concerns and issues that may be 113 occurring as a result of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter 114 operation. The operator may establish policies and procedures for the 115 meetings, including rules of decorum. The meetings shall be advertised at 116 least tenr(10)days in advance by posting notice on the operator's website and 117 a sign posted along the public street; 118 (4) Representatives from each of the following shall be included in the 119 community coordinating group: 120 (A)The homeless resource center or homeless shelter; 121 (B)A business located within on 1/4)mile of the site; 122 (C)A resident who lives within one r(1/4)mile of the site; 123 (D)A school, if any, located within on r(1/4)mile of the site; 124 (E) Chair of the community council, or designee, whose boundary 125 encompasses the site; 126 (F) An individual who has previously received or is currently receiving 127 services (i.e., client) from a homeless resource center or homeless shelter; 128 and 129 (5) A written annual report, provided on or before February 15th of each year, 130 from the operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter, 131 provided to the C4ty Rplanning Ddirector, which shall be posted to the 132 planning division website —And*^ the, city counei ,rari,h e f i _h^gp aig*ri^* 133 *'-Ph^me,'Ps „*a,.of he-mP'p-s- shedffer is leeatea, and which shall 134 includes the following information: 135 (A)List of individuals who have participated in the community coordinating 136 group meetings; 137 (B)A summary of each community coordinating group meeting; 138 (C)A summary of complaints received from the community by the operator of 139 the homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and 140 (D)An explanation of how complaints have been addressed/resolved. 4 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 141 (E) A review and analysis of the CPTED controls on site and the security and 142 operations plan identifying in_ any deficiencies. 143 b. A complaint response community relations program that includes strategies and 144 methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, 145 minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring 146 property, and prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource 147 center or homeless shelter on the site or adjacent public right-of-way. 148 c. A provision requiring a representative of the homeless resource center or 149 homeless shelter to meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any 150 neighborhood complaints regarding operation of the center; 151 d. A requirement fo continuous on-site security an gene y 152 serviees, which includes professional security personnel, monitored security 153 cameras, trained emergency responders, and emergency alert systems. 154 e. A plan to maintain noise levels in compliance with titk-9-, c-Chapter 9.28 of this 155 Ecode; 156 f. Design requirements that ensure any areas for client queuing take place strictly 157 within an enclosed*'.e f otpr-i * of the pr-ineipg building and will not oeouf on any 158 „1. - �kvvvt^ sid—PV*,,iv. 159 g. Designation of a location for smoking tobacco outdoors in conformance with 160 State laws; 161 h. A provision stating that any trash str-ownon the premises be collected and 162 deposited in a trash receptacle by sixk(6:00)A.M. the following day; 163 ine-411ding any smoking and par4ing lot areas; 164 i. A provision stating that portable trash receptacles on the premises be emptied 165 daily and that other receptacles be emptied at a minimum of once per week or as 166 needed. 167 j. Designation of an indoor location within the site where emergency services can 168 easilyprivately provide necessary services to clients. 170 leea4ed shall ensure dia4 the eper-a4er-eemplies with the requirements of this 171 subseetion A2. 172 3. The applicant shall rp ovi how the building and site plans that have 173 been reviewed by a certified CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental 174 Design)professional credentialed by the International Crime Prevention Through 175 Environmental Design Association or similar organization. The CPTED professional 176 shall indicate that the plans comply with CPTED principles and be approved by the 177 Salt Lake City Police Department. The police department may recommend 5 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 178 modification to the plans to improve the safety of the site to the zoning administrator. 179 The zoning administrator is authorized to allow modifications to the zoning 180 regulations listed in this section in order to improve the safety of the site when the 181 recommended modification is not permitted by the zoning ordinance. Modifications 182 shall be limited to the followingis ElOSig ^E' W ^ ^ ^^* ^ ^b-Aso' ^„ *"^ f^ll^l= 183 plow u,... eve the Planning G.,,..,,v.;ss r ,ti, o v ,,,1;4;^A-f;,,,, A-f t- ^ 184 pfoposeEl building and site plans if it d-potoo-nanliffileas 4iat the plans; do Hot suffioimtly 185 .,,l,lFewss eooh of these ploy. 186 a. Fence height and fence design; 187 b. Landscaping_; 188 c. Clear view distances at driveway 189 d. Design standards when necessary to provide privacy for the operation of the 190 homeless resource center. 191 Ar..44.,-..1 192 193 ; 194 , 195 f om . ublio sure Mad si11^..,..11c-s- to the building; 196 197 of oncivot-eandle, and pafking lots s .,ll be, ;ll, mi- te0d at ffi-i iffl-u i 199 (il)Exterior-lighting shall he--, shipul.l^a tO „+,-�O 1; ,,light 0110 0f afi pr-ovon 200 glare, and utilize light omitting diodes A-F iP-4-al-halido -fil-Am-€nts. 201 202 spaoes or-blook sight lines be. ..,pepe the building,ing .ublie s o .,,-king ., o 203 and landsoaped areas. 204 b.Natur-al Access Control: 205 207 (2) Wallamays are provided to guide people ffem the par-king areas to pfifnafy 208 ; 209 (3) LOW andsoape, low walls, oufbing, or-Qtl}e�powans :r-o used gu 210 pedestFians along walkways; 211 (n) All walkways ays ., v pr-opo,-l., —An ,11 ;ll iffi- ,,..ti-o !.N the site ; 212 shipel,lo.l to a;,-eet light a,,...,, ra fr-ofn no ,.l,bor-ing H refties; 6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 213 214 CO. TerTterIe-iic � r 215 , i"ieh are not visible 216 ftem the building or public spaces, 217 hems, 218 (2) P afking afeas . Pec�Ped A-4-4 id Pe f delay ;ght hOt1r-,- 219 (3) A mase that is A- of si feet high shall be- 220 provided 11 1 ' ier-side and r-ear-lot lines and dia4 eemplies with all required site distanee 221 (6') may be fequir-ed as 222 223 detfifnental impact oreated by the homeless msoufoe eeffter or homeless sheltef; 224 (4) Az€ifley-,He[tYteTtrian three feet (3')higher and does not or-eate[`l visible 225 , 226 , 227 (5) if the zoning distfiet does not require a!a-ndseape , the Planning 228 229 . 230 231 4. Maintenance: 232 MA. The building and site must beams maintained free from graffiti, litter, 233 garbage, and other items that constitute a nuisance; 234 (2)b. The building must bei-s maintained in good repair and all property damage 235 is repaired in a timely manner; 236 (mac. All fencing, walls, paving, walkways and other site features must bear 237 maintained in good repair, and free from obstruction. 238 c-.5. Building Aand Zoning Compliance: A homeless resource center or homeless 239 shelter shall comply with all applicable building and zoning regulations. 240 B. Standards for Homeless Resource Centers (Temporary) 241 1. When Allowed: A homeless resource center(temporary) is allowed if the following 242 situations are present in the city; 243 a. The existing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the city are at full 244 capacity or are likely to be at full capacity due to temperatures dropping below 32 245 degrees or heat index above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is reasonably expected; or 246 b. The city. inquired to provide emergency shelter by applicable state laws. 7 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 2. Location: A homeless resource center(temporary) may be located in existing 248 buildinjzs within the city if: 249 a. The building proposed for a homeless resource center(temporary) complies with 250 one of the following: 251 (1) is located in a zoning district that allows hotels, motels, or multi-family 252 dwellings; 253 (2) is owned by a government entity regardless of underlyingzoning;oning; or 254 (3) was constructed as a hotel, motel, or other temporary lodging purpose. 255 b. The site contains permanent or temporary restrooms adequate for the determined 256 occupancy. l 257 c. The building complies with or can comply with applicable building and fire codes 258 deemed necessary by cif officials who are qualified to make such a 259 determination. 260 d. The building complies with the spacing requirements as ma.. b�quired in Utah 261 Code Section 35A-16-502 regulating separation requirements or its successor. 262 3. Securi . and Operations Plan: The operator of the facility provides the city with a 263 security and operations plan that includes: 264 a. Contact information for a 24 hour property manager who has responsibility for 265 administering the security. a�perations plan and addressing nuisances or 266 compliance issues required by applicable laws. The contact info must be clearly 267 posted on the site and legible to passers-by, 268 b. A description of the intake process for those that may be using the facility that can 269 occur entirely within the building or on the property in a manner that does not 270 impact public sidewalks. 271 c. Designated smoking areas on the property that are located in areas that comply 272 with applicable laws and are at least 30 feet from a property. line. 273 d. A property maintenance plan to ensure that the property is maintained free of 274 litter and any waste. 275 e. A vicinity maintenance plan to ensure that the properties and public space within 276 660 feet of the property where the facility is located are free from any litter or 277 waste and that requires the facility operator to respond to requests from property 278 owners or occupants of the properties within 660 feet to remove any waste, 279 including sanitization when necessary, that can be attributed to the occupants of 280 the facility. 281 £ Provisions that address ingress and egress to the site. The zoning administrator 282 may require features such as fences to regulategress and ingress to the site. 8 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 283 g. A requirement for continuous on-site security which includes professional 284 security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency responders, 285 and emergency alert systems. 286 4. Temporary Land Use Regulations: The city council may approve any homeless 287 resource center(temporary)utilizing temporary land use approval authority 288 prescribed under current laws. 289 290 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.50.030. That Section 21A.50.350 of 291 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 292 21A.50.030: INITIATION: 293 Amendments to the text of this title or to the zoning map may be initiated by filing an 294 application for an amendment addressed to the planning commission. Applications for 295 amendments may be initiated by the mayor, the city council, the planning commission, or the 296 owner of the property included in the application, or the property owner's authorized agent. 297 Applications related to H hHistoric pPreservation eOverlay dDistricts or landmark sites or 298 the Homeless Resource Center Overlay shall be initiated as provided in eChapter 21A.34 of 299 this title. 300 301 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.50.040. That Section 21A.50.040 of 302 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 303 21A.50.040: PROCEDURE: 304 An amendment to the text of this title or to the zoning map initiated by any of the methods 305 described in sSection 21A.50.030 of this chapter shall be processed in accordance with the 306 following procedures: 307 A. Application: An application shall be made to the zoning administrator on a form or forms 308 provided by the office of the zoning administrator, which shall include at least the 309 following information: 310 1. A statement of the text amendment or map amendment describing the purpose for the 311 amendment and the exact language, boundaries and zoning district; 312 2. Street address and legal description of the property; 313 3. A complete description of the proposed use of the property where appropriate; 314 4. Site plans drawn to scale (where applicable); and 315 5. Related materials or data supporting the application as may be determined by the 316 applicant and the zoning administrator. 9 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 317 B. Fees: The application shall be accompanied by the applicable fees shown on the Salt 318 Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible for payment 319 of all fees established for providing the public notice required by sChapter 21A.10 of this 320 title. Application and noticing fees filed by the city council,planning commission or the 321 mayor shall not be required. Application and noticing fees filed for designation within an 322 H-hHistoric pPreservation oOverlay dDistrict or to establish a character conservation 323 district shall not be required. 324 C. Determination Oof Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for an amendment, the 325 zoning administrator shall make a determination of completeness pursuant to sSection 326 21A.10.010, "General Application Procedures", of this title. 327 D. Staff Report: A staff report evaluating the amendment application shall be prepared by 328 the planning director and shall contain at least the following information: 329 1. An analysis of any factors to be considered found in this title. 330 2. A discussion regarding_input received from the public. 331 3. Input from other city departments or entities who have provided comments related to 332 the proposal. 333 E. Planning Commission Public Hearing: The planning commission shall schedule and hold 334 a public hearing on the completed application in accordance with the standards and 335 procedures for conduct of the public hearing set forth in c-Chapter 21A.10, "General 336 Application Aand Public Hearing Procedures", of this title. The following_provisions 337 apply for petitions to amend the zoning map that are requesting to applying the Homeless 338 Resource Center Overlay District: 339 1. The planning commission may hold a public hearingduring the required 45-daX 340 public notification period required in Section 2.60.050 of the Salt Lake City Code for 341 zoning map amendments to apply the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. No 342 recommendation shall be made by the planning commission during the 45-daX 343 notification period. 344 2. During the 45-daX_public notification period, the petitioner shall arrange an 345 opportunitypeople who are experiencing homelessness to provide input on the 346 proposed location of the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 347 3. Notice of the public hearing shall be sent via first class mail to property owners and 348 tenants within 450 feet of the proposed boundaries of the petition to map the 349 Homeless Resource Center Overlay District. 350 4. The petition shall be scheduled for a recommendation from the planning commission 351 at the first regularly scheduled commission meeting following the end of the 45-daX 352 notification period. 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 353 F. Planning Commission Decision: Following the public hearing, the gplanning 354 Ecommission shall recommend approval or denial of the proposed amendment or the 355 approval of some modification of the amendment and shall then submit its 356 recommendation to the Ecity Ecouncil. 357 G. City Council Hearing: The Ecity Ecouncil shall schedule and hold a public hearing to 358 consider the proposed amendment in accordance with the standards and procedures for 359 conduct of the public hearing set forth in c-Chapter 2 IA.10, "General Application Aand 360 Public Hearing Procedures", of this title within 90 days of receipt of the administration's 361 transmittal. 362 H. City Council Decision: Following the hearing,the Ecity Ecouncil within a reasonable 363 time frame may adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the proposed amendment with 364 modifications, or deny the proposed amendment. However, no additional land may be 365 zoned to a different classification than was contained in the public notice, and no land 366 may be rezoned to a less restricted classification, without new notice and hearing. 367 368 SECTION 5. Adopting Section 21A.50.055. That Section 21A.50.055 of the Salt Lake 369 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted to read as follows: 370 21A.50.055: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS APPLYING THE HOMELESS 371 RESOURCE CENTER OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT. 372 A. Applicability. Apy proposal to consider a petition that involves a zoning map 373 amendment to apply the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District shall be subject to 374 the additional requirements of this section in addition to any other requirement of this 375 title. 376 377 B. Additional Submittal Requirements. In addition to the application requirements of this 378 chapter, the following information shall be provided by the person submitting a zoning 379 amendment petition that includes applying the Homeless Resource Center Overlay 380 District. 381 1. Development plans meetingthe he requirements of Chapter 21A.58 and the following 382 additional detail: 383 a. The plans shall include all labels for the function of each room or space, both 384 indoor and outdoor,proposed for the facility. 385 b. All information that demonstrates compliance with the requirements in Section 386 21A.36.350. 387 2. The maximum total human occupancy the proposed facility is intended to serve. 11 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 388 3. A detailed list of all the anticipated supportive services to be offered on the property, 389 including a description of each service, where the service will be on the property and 390 the square footage of the area designated for each service. 391 4. An.. anticipated funding requests made to the city to operate the facility, 392 C. Information Provided by the City. After a complete application has been submitted to 393 apply this overlay to property within the boundaries of the city, applicable city 394 departments shall provide the planning division with the following information within 30 395 days. 396 1. Information re ag rdin the to the police department which may include any 397 data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resources centers located in 398 the city, the estimated cost of providing service by the police department to existing 399 homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on 400 the ability of the police department to provide services to other parts of the cites 401 402 2. Information re ag rdin the to the fire department which may include and 403 that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resources centers located in the 404 city and the estimated cost of providing service by the fire department to existing 405 homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on 406 the ability of the fire department to provide services to other parts of the cit. 407 408 3. Information re ag rding the number of civil enforcement cases associated with existing 409 homeless resource centers, including the types of complaints, and the estimated 410 impact to civil enforcement workloads and ability to provide services to other parts of 411 the city. 412 413 4. Information regarding accessibility of the site and its impact on public services. 414 415 5. The city provides an updated website to provide any and all city departments to 416 contact for various complaints such as graffiti, encampment clean up, enforcement 417 issues, and any other identified city service that may address impacts on the 418 neighborhood from homeless resource centers. 419 420 6. Data provided by the State Homeless Management Information System and the SL 421 Valley Coalition to end homelessness regarding similar uses in Salt Lake County, 422 including the total number of facilities, the total number of people who use the 423 facilities, the number of individuals served with overnight tenancy in each facility, the 424 average percentage of occupancy of the facilities, and the number of nights per.year 425 that the other facilities are at capacity to the extent that the information is available. 426 427 7. Data regarding the total number of beds available to people experiencing 428 homelessness and the estimated number of people currently experiencing 429 homelessness to the extent that the information is available. 12 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 430 D. Additional Factors to Consider: In making a decision regarding a petition to map the 431 Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, the planning commission and city council 432 shall consider the following factors, in addition to those factors identified elsewhere in 433 Chapter 21A.50: 434 435 1. The anticipated benefits to people experiencing homelessness provided by the facility 436 in the proposed location. 437 2. The proximity of sLipport services that benefit people who may use the facility and the 438 ability of people to access services from the proposed location. If services are not 439 within walking distance of the proposed facility, consideration of a transportation 440 plan connecting support services to the facility. 441 3. The ratio of homeless related services provided in Salt Lake City compared to other 442 jurisdictions in Salt Lake County. 443 4. The anticipated impact to city services, including fire,police, and any other city 444 department that would be involved in providing services to the facility and the 445 impact, if any, to the city providing services in other parts of the city_ 446 5. The proximity is at least a mile from other homeless resource centers. 447 6. The effectiveness of the securi , and operations plan provided by the petitioner to 448 address impacts created by the homeless resource center. 449 7. Equity between different neighborhoods in providing homeless resource centers and 450 other locations of impactful land uses. High impact land uses are those land uses that 451 produce higher levels of pollution than the permitted uses in the underlying zone, land 452 uses that attract crime or produce public nuisances, and land uses that are located by a 453 government entity or authorized by a government entity and that are not subject to the 454 land use regulations of the city. 455 8. Demonstrated compliance with the requirements of Section 21A.36.350. 456 SECTION 6. Adopting Section 21A.50.065. That Section 21A.50.080 of the Salt Lake 457 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 458 21A.50.065: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. 459 The city council may consider applying requirements through an appropriate legal agreement 460 with a petition for a zoning amendment when the city council determines that such an 461 agreement is necessary to increase the benefit of the proposed zoning amendment and/or to 462 address potential impacts to city services, surrounding land uses,public safety, and the health 463 of current and future residents,business owners, and visitors to the city. The agreement may 464 modify any pplicable requirement of this title provided the modification was proposed to 465 and considered by the planning commission as required for an,, zoning amendment. 466 Agreements that constrain the development potential or land uses of the subject property 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 467 compared to what is authorized in the proposed zoning district are not required to be 468 reviewed by the planning commission prior to consideration of the agreement. 469 470 SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.020. That Section 21A.60.020 of 471 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended to add the following term, which shall be inserted in 472 alphabetical order: 473 Homeless Resource Center(Temporary) 474 475 SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Section 21A.62.040. That definitions of the terms 476 "Homeless Resource Center" and"Homeless Shelter"be amended as set forth below and the 477 term"Homeless Resource Center(Temporary)"be added to Section 2 IA.62.040 of the Salt Lake 478 City Code, which shall be inserted in alphabetical order and shall read as follows: 479 HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: A building or portion thereof which contains sleeping 480 facilities for those experiencing homeless and operates year round. The facility may contain 481 related services such as bathing eating, laundry aundry facilities, housing case management, medical 482 care and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; 483 educational instruction, and/or vocational training as defined in Utah State Code or its 484 successor. n„ o����i;�t,.,,o.,�; *,hieh i,,,.Ate- ,,, ive so oUs e as deep,. 485 , and hou nagement is provided Oil 486 487 ; 488 , 489 HOMELESS SHELTER: See the definition of Homeless Resource Center. An est blis men 490 491 hemelessfiess. 492 HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER(Temporary): A building or portion thereof which 493 contains sleeping facilities for no more than 150 people per night experiencing homelessness 494 and operates for no more than 180 consecutive days or a total of 180 days in a calendar.year 495 between October 1 and April 301h of the following year. The facility may contain related 496 services such as bathing eating, lg aundry facilities, housing case management, medical care 497 and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational 498 instruction, and/or vocational training as defined in Utah State Code or its successor. 499 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 500 SECTION 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 501 first publication. 502 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah, this day of , 503 2023. 504 505 CHAIRPERSON 506 507 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 508 509 510 CITY RECORDER 511 512 Transmitted to Mayor on 513 514 515 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 516 517 518 MAYOR 519 520 CITY RECORDER 521 (SEAL) 522 APPROVED AS TO FORM 523 Bill NO. Of 2023. Salt Lake City Attorney's Office 524 Published: Date: 525 Ordinance adopting HRC Overlay(legislative) 526 By: 527 Katherine D.Pasker,Senior City Attorney 15 ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' � and NEIGHBORHOODS �' =x Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL CIS (Jan 23,202310:56 MST) Date Received: 01/23/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 01/23/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 17, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community &Neighborhoods SUBJECT: Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, nick.norriskslc, o DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopt the Homeless Resource Center Overlay Text Amendment and consider the modifications recommended by Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The proposed Homeless Resource Center(HRC) Overlay text amendment is in response to the moratorium adopted by the City Council in April of 2022, ordinance 15A of 2022. The moratorium removed HRCs and homeless shelters from the land use tables. Prior to the moratorium, HRCs were allowed as conditional uses in the D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse) and CG (General Commercial)zoning districts. To ensure clear guidance on developing a new process, the council provided the following project goals: • The safety and welfare of those experiencing homelessness in the city. • The impact to communities when HRCs and related services are concentrated. • The impact that future HRCs have on city services. • The financial ability of service providers to comply with regulations and still provide necessary shelter and/or services. • Identifying the impacts that are the responsibility of the operator of an HRC and those impacts that should be the responsibility of others. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145486,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 • Avoiding inequities in the locations of HRCs and homeless shelters. In response to the established goals, staff sought a solution with the primary purpose to protect the safety and welfare of those experiencing homelessness within Salt Lake City. The developed proposal is the Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District. The proposed HRC Overlay establishes regulations for future homeless resource centers and homeless shelters. Any future HRC or emergency shelter would require a zoning map amendment to apply the overlay. Once the HRC Overlay is mapped, a new HRC would be a permitted use. In order to address many of the comments and concerns provided by the public and city departments, the request to map the proposed HRC Overlay requires a great deal of information provided by the service provider, impacted city departments and the Director of Homeless Policy and Outreach associated with the Administration. The following information outlines the requirements and the process associated with the proposed HRC Overlay. The service provider is required to provide the listed information upon submittal to apply the HRC Overlay to a specific property. 1. Development plans must meet the requirements of chapter 21A.58 and the following additional detail: a. The plans shall include all labels for the function of each room or space, both indoor and outdoor, proposed for the facility. b. All information that demonstrates compliance with the requirements in 21A.36.350. 2. The maximum total human occupancy the proposed facility is intended to serve. 3. A detailed list of all anticipated supportive services to be offered on the property, including a description of each service, where the service will be on the property and the square footage of the area designated for each service. 4. Any anticipated funding requests made to the city to operate the facility. As part of the application process, staff and applicable city departments are required to compile the following information within 30 days of the application submittal. 1. Information regarding the impact to the police department which may include any data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resource centers located in the city, the estimated cost of providing service by the police department to existing homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the police department to provide services to other parts of the city. 2. Information regarding the impact to the fire department which may include any data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resource centers located in the city and the estimated cost of providing service by the fire department to existing homeless resource centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the fire department to provide services to other parts of the city. 3. Information regarding the number of civil enforcement cases associated with existing homeless resource centers, including the types of complaints, and the estimated impact to civil enforcement workloads and ability to provide services to other parts of the city. 4. Information regarding accessibility of the site and its impact on Public Services. 5. The city provides an updated website to provide any and all city departments to contact for various complaints such as graffiti, encampment clean up, enforcement issues, and any other identified city service that may address impacts on the neighborhood from HRCs. 6. Data provided by the State Homeless Management Information System and the SL Valley Coalition to end homelessness regarding similar uses in Salt Lake County, including the total number of facilities, the total number of people who use the facilities, the number of individuals served with overnight tenancy in each facility, the average percentage of occupancy of the facilities, and the number of nights per year that the other facilities are at capacity to the extent that the information is available. 7. Data regarding the total number of beds available to people experiencing homelessness and the estimated number of people experiencing homelessness to the extent that the information is available. To address many of the impacts and the concerns raised by city departments, as well as the public, staff created specific factors for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider when applying the proposed overlay, which include the following: 1. The anticipated benefits to people experiencing homelessness provided by the facility in the proposed location. 2. The proximity of support services that benefit people who may use the facility and the ability of people to access services from the proposed location. If services are not within walking distance of the proposed facility, consideration of a transportation plan connecting support services to the facility. 3. The ratio of homeless related services provided in Salt Lake City compared to other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County. 4. The anticipated impact to city services, including fire, police, and any other city department that would be involved in providing services to the facility and the impact, if any, to the city providing services in other parts of the city. 5. The proximity to other homeless resource centers. 6. The effectiveness of the security and operations plan provided by the petitioner to address impacts created by the homeless resource center. 7. Equity between different neighborhoods in providing HRCs and other locations of impactful land uses. High impact land uses are those land uses that produce higher levels of pollution than the permitted uses in the underlying zone, and uses that attract crime or produce public nuisances, and land uses that located by a government entity or authorized by a government entity, that is not subject to the land use regulations of the city. 8. Demonstrated compliance with the requirements of 21A.36.350. A request to map the HRC Overlay, the service provider would be required to submit a zoning map amendment application. This process requires a 45-day public input period, and at least one public hearing with the Planning Commission and a public hearing with the City Council. This proposal includes a mandatory timeline associated with scheduling of public hearings with the Planning Commission to streamline the approval process. In addition to the condensed timeline, staff integrated a requirement that the service provider must conduct engagement with individuals experiencing homelessness. Additionally, staff increased the public notification to property owners and tenants from 300' to 450' to ensure that the broader community is informed of future HRC requests. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission provided a positive recommendation on the proposed HRC Overlay with two additional recommendations, which are included in the attached ordinance. The Planning Commission recommends the following language be adopted by the City Council: • Homeless Resource Centers with up to 40 beds be approved through the conditional use process in any zoning district with residential uses. • The City Council expedite the review and approval of a requested HRC Overlay within 90 days of the recommendation of Planning Commission. Regarding the first recommendation, staff has not had the opportunity to research any anticipated impacts related to HRCs with an occupancy of 40 people. This may have unintended consequences that are unknown at this time. PUBLIC PROCESS: Planning Staff conducted a series of stakeholder meetings, in order to gain valuable input on current impacts and a future amendment. The series of stakeholder meetings informed the HRC Overlay proposal. • June 16, 2022—Focus Group: Community Council Chairs • July 5, 2022—Focus Group: Advocates for People Experiencing Homelessness • July 6, 2022—Focus Group: Service Providers • July 25, 2022—Focus Group: Business Community • July and August—Allison Dupler(Homeless Strategies and Outreach Coordinator in Mayor's Office)met with people experiencing homelessness at both HRCs, the Rescue Mission, and Nomad Alliance supply drive. A total of 68 people (54 sheltered, 14 unsheltered)provided input. • Facebook Live Event: November 1, 2022 • Open House: November 10, 2022 • Online Open House: October 15th-November 30th.The required 45-day public input period was noticed on October 14th and ended on November 30th, 2022. Input and comments received during the public process were used to draft the proposal. Input has also been received during the 45-day engagement period. Most input was provided through comments entered through the project website. There were 16 comments submitted online. Three commenters indicated that they support the proposal, four indicated that they do not support the proposal, and eight indicated that they could support the proposal with modifications. These comments are included in the PC staff report for December 14, 2022. Any comments provided after the publication of the PC staff report are included in Exhibit 4. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda December 14, 2022 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes December 14, 2022 (Click to Access) c) PC Staff Report December 14, 2022 (Click to Access) d) PC Agenda November 9, 2022 (Click to Access) e) PC Minutes November 9, 2022 (Click to Access) f) PC Staff Report November 9, 2022(Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Comments Received After Publication of PC Staff Report I SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2023 3 4 (Adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, Adopting standards pertaining to 5 Temporary Homeless Resource Centers,Amending the zoning text of Section 21A.36.350 and 6 Chapter 21A.50 pertaining to Homeless Resource Centers and Development Agreements, and 7 Amending definitions in Title 2 1 A associated with the foregoing) 8 9 An ordinance adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay District, adopting 10 standards pertaining to Temporary Homeless Resource Centers, amending the zoning text of I I Section 21A.36.350 and Chapter 21A.50 pertaining to Homeless Resource Centers and 12 Development Agreements, and amending definitions in Title 2 1 A associated with the foregoing 13 all pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-01068. 14 WHEREAS, on December 14, 2022,the Salt Lake City Planning Commission("Planning 15 Commission") held a public hearing on a petition submitted by the Salt Lake City Council ("City 16 Council")to amend land use regulations pertaining to homeless resource centers (Petition No. 17 PLNPCM2022-01068); and 18 WHEREAS, at its December 14, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 19 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and 20 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 21 adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. 22 NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: 23 SECTION I. Adopting Section 21A.34.160. That Section 21A.34.160 of the Salt Lake 24 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 25 21A.34.160: HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT 26 Purpose: The intent of the overlay is to consider the safety and welfare of those experiencing 27 homelessness while considering the impact to city services and adjacent neighborhoods and 28 minimize the effects on neighborhoods and populations that have traditionally been marginalized 29 when considering locations for future homeless resource centers. 30 A. Applicability: The process and regulations found in this chapter apply to all homeless 31 resource centers existing prior to January 1, 2023 and any proposed homeless resource 32 centers mapped within the city. This overlay is prohibited in the M-1 and M-2 zoning 33 districts. 34 35 B. Applying to Zoning Map: A petition to apply this overlay shall be subject to the 36 applicable provisions of 21A.50. 37 1. A homeless resource center shall only be allowed if located within the homeless 38 resource center overlay or as otherwise allowed by this title. 39 2. City Council Action: In deciding to apply this overlay, the city council may 40 consider a development agreement to address any benefit or impact that a 41 proposed homeless resource center may have on the surroundings of the proposed 42 location of the overlay. Upon receiving a recommendation from the planning 43 commission on a petition to apply this overlay the city council shall render a 44 decision on the petition within 90 days. 45 3. Permitted Use: If approved by the city council, a homeless resource center shall 46 be a permitted use within the boundary of the homeless resource center overlay 47 district. 48 49 C. A homeless resource center with an occupancy of up to 40 individuals experiencing 50 homelessness is not required to be located within the homeless resource center overlay 51 district, provided that such center is (1) located within a zoning district that permits 52 residential uses, and (2) approved pursuant to Chapter 21A.54. 53 54 D. Previously Approved Homeless Resource Centers and Homeless Shelters: An existing 55 homeless resource center or homeless shelter that was approved as a conditional use prior 56 to January 1, 2023 shall be subject to the specifics of the conditional use approval, and 57 any subsequent modification to the approval, that were placed on the use at the time of 58 approval, and subject to the following modification limitations: 59 1. Modifications to prior conditional use approval. A modification to a prior 60 conditional use shall be subject to 21A.54.135. 61 2. Any modification beyond 21A.54.135 is subject to a zoning map amendment to 62 apply this overlay. 63 64 E. Applicability to Places of Worship. A place of worship is not required to petition for a 65 zoning map amendment to apply this overlay provided any emergency shelter provided is 66 part of the ecclesiastic function of the place of worship. A place of worship that provides 67 emergency shelter to people experiencing homelessness shall comply with the provisions 68 of 21A.36.350. 69 70 F. Complying with standards. Any existing or proposed homeless resource center or 71 homeless shelter shall comply with the applicable provisions of this title, including but 72 not limited to the requirements of the underlying zoning district and section 21A.36.350. 73 SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.36.350. That Section 21A.36.350 of 74 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 75 21A.36.350: STANDARDS FOR HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS 76 A. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter may be allowed pursuant to 21A.34 of 77 this title and the requirements of this section. A homeless resource center or homeless shelter 78 located within the city shall comply with the following regulations. Any homeless resource 79 center or homeless shelter approved as a conditional use shall comply with these regulations and 80 the requirements of the approved conditional use. The owner of the property where a homeless 81 resource center or homeless shelter is located shall ensure that the operator complies with the 82 requirements of this chapter. 83 1. Capacity Limit: a maximum of two hundred(200)unsheltered persons. 84 2. Security and operations plan. A plan shall be prepared by the applicant, and 85 approved by the Salt Lake City Police Department and Community and Neighborhoods 86 Department, and filed with the Recorder's Office. A security and operations plan shall include: 87 a. A community relations and complaint response program that identifies specific 88 strategies and methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, 89 minimize potential conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring properties, and 90 prohibit unlawful behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on 91 the site. The community relations and complaint response program shall include at least the 92 following elements: 93 (1) Identify a representative of the homeless resource center or homeless 94 shelter, including the representative's name,telephone number, and email,who will meet with 95 neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any complaints regarding operation of the center; 96 (2) A dedicated 24 hour telephone line for the purpose of receiving 97 complaints; 98 (3) Quarterly meetings with a community coordinating group, which shall be 99 open to the public, to discuss and address concerns and issues that may be occurring as a result 100 of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter operation. The operator may establish 101 policies and procedures for the meetings, including rules of decorum. The meetings shall be 102 advertised at least 10 days in advance by posting notice on the operator's website and a sign 103 posted along the public street; 104 (4) Representatives from each of the following shall be included in the 105 community coordinating group: 106 (A)The homeless resource center or homeless shelter; 107 (B)A business located within 1/4 mile of the site; 108 (C)A resident who lives within 1/4 mile of the site; 109 (D)A school, if any,located within 1/4 mile of the site; 110 (E) Chair of the community council, or designee, whose boundary 111 encompasses the site; 112 (F) An individual who has previously received or is currently receiving 113 services (i.e., client) from a homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and 114 (5) A written annual report,provided on or before February 15th of each year, 115 from the operator of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter,provided to the City 116 Planning Director, which shall be posted to the Planning Division website and which shall 117 include the following information: 118 (A)List of individuals who have participated in the community coordinating 119 group meetings; 120 (B)A summary of each community coordinating group meeting; 121 (C)A summary of complaints received from the community by the operator of 122 the homeless resource center or homeless shelter; and 123 (D)An explanation of how complaints have been addressed/resolved. 124 b. A complaint response community relations program that includes strategies and 125 methods designed to maintain the premises in a clean and orderly condition, minimize potential 126 conflicts with the owners/operators and uses of neighboring property, and prohibit unlawful 127 behavior by occupants of the homeless resource center or homeless shelter on the site or adjacent 128 public right-of-way. 129 c. A provision requiring a representative of the homeless resource center or 130 homeless shelter to meet with neighbors upon request to attempt to resolve any neighborhood 131 complaints regarding operation of the center; 132 d. A requirement for continuous on-site security,which includes professional 133 security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency responders, and emergency 134 alert systems. 135 e. A plan to maintain noise levels in compliance with chapter 9.28 of this Code; 136 f. Design requirements that ensure any areas for client queuing take place strictly 137 within an enclosed building; 138 g. Designation of a location for smoking tobacco outdoors in conformance with 139 State laws; 140 h. A provision stating that any trash on the premises be collected and deposited in a 141 trash receptacle by 6:00 A.M. the following day; 142 i. A provision stating that portable trash receptacles on the premises be emptied 143 daily and that other receptacles be emptied at a minimum of once per week or as needed. 144 j. Designation of an indoor location within the site where emergency services can 145 easily and privately provide necessary services to clients. 146 k. Visible signage at all public entrances indicating that firearms are not permitted 147 inside the homeless shelter. A means of detecting firearms at all public entrances and the plan to 148 ensure an individual is physically present at all entrances when the public entrance is in use. A 149 secure storage area for a firearm for clients of the shelter but also clear policies to not collect 150 information on the firearm while in storage at shelter. An abandonment plan if a firearm is left at 151 the shelter for more than 7 days,process to relinquish to a law enforcement agency for disposal. 152 3. The applicant shall provide building and site plans that have been reviewed by a 153 certified CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design)professional credentialed 154 by the International Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Association or similar 155 organization. The CPTED professional shall indicate that the plans comply with CPTED 156 principles and be approved by the Salt Lake City Police Department. The police department may 157 recommend modification to the plans to improve the safety of the site to the zoning 158 administrator. The zoning administrator is authorized to allow modifications to the zoning 159 regulations listed in this section in order to improve the safety of the site when the recommended 160 modification is not permitted by the zoning ordinance. Modifications shall be limited to the 161 following: 162 a. Fence height and fence design; 163 b. Landscaping; 164 c. Clear view distances at driveways; 165 d. Design standards when necessary to provide privacy for the operation of the 166 homeless resource center. 167 4. Maintenance: 168 a. The building and site must be maintained free from graffiti, litter, garbage, and 169 other items that constitute a nuisance; 170 b. The building must be maintained in good repair and all property damage is 171 repaired in a timely manner; 172 c. All fencing, walls, paving, walkways and other site features must be maintained 173 in good repair, and free from obstruction. 174 5. Building And Zoning Compliance: A homeless resource center or homeless 175 shelter shall comply with all applicable building and zoning regulations. 176 B. Standards for Homeless Resource Centers (Temporary) 177 1. When Allowed: A homeless resource center(temporary) is allowed if the 178 following situations are present in the city: 179 a. The existing homeless resource centers and homeless shelters in the city are at full 180 capacity or are likely to be at full capacity due to temperatures dropping below 32 degrees or 181 heat index above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is reasonably expected; and 182 b. The city is required to provide emergency shelter by applicable state laws. 183 2. Location: A homeless resource center(temporary) may be located in existing 184 buildings within the city if: 185 a. The building proposed for a homeless resource center(temporary) complies with 186 one of the following: 187 (1) is located in a zoning district that allows hotels, motels, or multi-family 188 dwellings; 189 (2) is owned by a government entity regardless of underlying zoning; or 190 (3) was constructed as a hotel, motel, or other temporary lodging purpose. 191 b. The site contains permanent or temporary restrooms adequate for the determined 192 occupancyload. 193 c. The building complies with or can comply with applicable building and fire codes 194 deemed necessary by city officials who are qualified to make such a determination. 195 d. The building complies with the spacing requirements in Utah Code 35A-16-502 196 (11)regulating separation requirements or its successor. The separation requirement in 3 5A-16- 197 502 (11)(c) is waived upon adoption of this section by the Salt Lake City Council. The 198 requirement in 35A-16-502(11)(c)pertaining to community locations may be waived or reduced 199 by the director of community and neighborhoods department. The director of community and 200 neighborhoods department may also waive any future separation requirement that is added to 201 35A-16-502. 202 3. Security and Operations Plan: The operator of the facility provides the city with a 203 security and operations plan that includes: 204 a. Contact information for a 24 hour property manager who has responsibility for 205 administering the security and operations plan and addressing nuisances or compliance issues 206 required by applicable laws. The contact info must be clearly posted on the site and legible to 207 passers-by. 208 b. A description of the intake process for those that may be using the facility that can 209 occur entirely within the building or on the property in a manner that does not impact public 210 sidewalks. 211 c. Designated smoking areas on the property that are located in areas that comply 212 with applicable laws and are at least 30 feet from a property line. 213 d. A property maintenance plan to ensure that the property is maintained free of 214 litter and any waste. 215 e. A vicinity maintenance plan to ensure that the properties and public space within 216 660 feet of the property where the facility is located are free from any litter or waste and that 217 requires the facility operator to respond to requests from property owners or occupants of the 218 properties within 660 feet to remove any waste, including sanitization when necessary, that can 219 be attributed to the occupants of the facility. 220 £ Visible signage at all public entrances indicating that firearms are not permitted 221 inside the homeless shelter. A means of detecting firearms at all public entrances and the plan to 222 ensure an individual is physically present at all entrances when the public entrance is in use. A 223 secure storage area for a firearm for clients of the shelter but also clear policies to not collect 224 information on the firearm while in storage at shelter. An abandonment plan if a firearm is left at 225 the shelter for more than 7 days,process to relinquish to a law enforcement agency for disposal. 226 g. Provisions that address ingress and egress to the site. The zoning administrator 227 may require features such as fences to regulate egress and ingress to the site. 228 h. A requirement for continuous on-site security which includes professional 229 security personnel, monitored security cameras, trained emergency responders, and emergency 230 alert systems. 231 4. Limitations. A homeless resource center(temporary) approved under these 232 regulations may only occupy a site once every four years. 233 5. Temporary Land Use Regulations: The city council may approve any homeless 234 resource center(temporary)utilizing temporary land use approval authority prescribed under 235 current laws. 236 SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.50.030. That Section 21A.50.350 of 237 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 238 21A.50.030: INITIATION: 239 Amendments to the text of this title or to the zoning map may be initiated by filing an application 240 for an amendment addressed to the planning commission. Applications for amendments may be 241 initiated by the mayor, the city council, the planning commission, or the owner of the property 242 included in the application, or the property owner's authorized agent. Applications related to H 243 historic preservation overlay districts or landmark sites or the Homeless Resource Center 244 Overlay shall be initiated as provided in chapter 21A.34 of this title. 245 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Section 21A.50.040. That Section 21A.50.040 of 246 the Salt Lake City Code shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 247 21A.50.040: PROCEDURE: 248 An amendment to the text of this title or to the zoning map initiated by any of the methods 249 described in section 21A.50.030 of this chapter shall be processed in accordance with the 250 following procedures: 251 A. Application: An application shall be made to the zoning administrator on a form 252 or forms provided by the office of the zoning administrator, which shall include at least the 253 following information: 254 1. A statement of the text amendment or map amendment describing the purpose for 255 the amendment and the exact language, boundaries and zoning district; 256 2. Street address and legal description of the property; 257 3. A complete description of the proposed use of the property where appropriate; 258 4. Site plans drawn to scale (where applicable); and 259 5. Related materials or data supporting the application as may be determined by the 260 applicant and the zoning administrator. 261 B. Fees: The application shall be accompanied by the applicable fees shown on the 262 Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible for payment of 263 all fees established for providing the public notice required by chapter 21A.10 of this title. 264 Application and noticing fees filed by the city council,planning commission or the mayor shall 265 not be required. Application and noticing fees filed for designation within an H historic 266 preservation overlay district or to establish a character conservation district shall not be required. 267 C. Determination Of Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for an 268 amendment, the zoning administrator shall make a determination of completeness pursuant to 269 section 21A.10.010, "General Application Procedures", of this title. 270 D. Staff Report: A staff report evaluating the amendment application shall be 271 prepared by the planning director and shall contain at least the following information: 272 1. An analysis of any factors to be considered found in this title. 273 2. A discussion regarding input received from the public. 274 3. Input from other city departments or entities who have provided comments related 275 to the proposal. 276 E. Planning Commission Public Hearing: The planning commission shall schedule 277 and hold a public hearing on the completed application in accordance with the standards and 278 procedures for conduct of the public hearing set forth in chapter 2 IA.10, "General Application 279 And Public Hearing Procedures", of this title. The following provisions apply for petitions to 280 amend the zoning map that are requesting to applying the homeless resource center overlay 281 district: 282 1. Zoning Map Amendments to locate the homeless resource center overlay can hold 283 a public hearing with the planning commission during the required 45-day public notification 284 period, as required in Section 2.60.050 of the Salt Lake City Code. No recommendation shall be 285 made by the planning commission during the 45-day notification period. 286 2. During the 45-day public notification period, the petitioner shall arrange an 287 opportunity for people who are experiencing homelessness to provide input on the proposed 288 location of the homeless resource center overlay district. 289 3. Notice of the public hearing shall be sent via first class mail to property owners 290 and tenants within 450 feet of the proposed boundaries of the petition to map the homeless 291 resource center overlay. 292 4. The petition shall be scheduled for a recommendation from the planning 293 commission at the first regularly scheduled commission meeting following the end of the 45-day 294 notification period. 295 F. Planning Commission Decision: Following the public hearing, the planning 296 commission shall recommend approval or denial of the proposed amendment or the approval of 297 some modification of the amendment and shall then submit its recommendation to the city 298 council. 299 G. City Council Hearing: The city council shall schedule and hold a public hearing to 300 consider the proposed amendment in accordance with the standards and procedures for conduct 301 of the public hearing set forth in chapter 2 IA.10, "General Application And Public Hearing 302 Procedures", of this title. 303 H. City Council Decision: Following the hearing, the city council may adopt the 304 proposed amendment, adopt the proposed amendment with modifications, or deny the proposed 305 amendment. However, no additional land may be zoned to a different classification than was 306 contained in the public notice, and no land may be rezoned to a less restricted classification, 307 without new notice and hearing. 308 SECTION 5. Adopting Section 21A.50.060. That Section 21A.50.060 of the Salt Lake 309 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 310 21A.50.060: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS APPLYING THE HOMELESS 311 RESOURCE CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT. 312 A. Applicability. Any proposal to consider a petition that involves a zoning map 313 amendment to apply the homeless resource center overlay district shall be subject to the 314 additional requirements of this section in addition to any other requirement of this title. 315 316 B. Additional Submittal Requirements. In addition to the application requirements of this 317 chapter, the following information shall be provided by the person submitting a zoning 318 amendment petition that includes applying the homeless resource center overlay district. 319 1. Development plans meeting the requirements of chapter 21A.58 and the following 320 additional detail: 321 a. The plans shall include all labels for the function of each room or space,both 322 indoor and outdoor,proposed for the facility. 323 b. All information that demonstrates compliance with the requirements in 324 21A.36.350. 325 2. The maximum total human occupancy the proposed facility is intended to serve. 326 3. A detailed list of all the anticipated supportive services to be offered on the 327 property, including a description of each service,where the service will be on the property and 328 the square footage of the area designated for each service. 329 4. Any anticipated funding requests made to the city to operate the facility. 330 C. Information Provided by the City. After a complete application has been submitted to 331 apply this overlay to property within the boundaries of the city, applicable city departments shall 332 provide the Planning Division with the following information within 30 days: 333 1. Information regarding the impact to the police department which may include any 334 data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resources centers located in the city, the 335 estimated cost of providing service by the police department to existing homeless resource 336 centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the police 337 department to provide services to other parts of the city. 338 339 2. Information regarding the impact to the fire department which may include any 340 data that demonstrates the services to existing homeless resources centers located in the city and 341 the estimated cost of providing service by the fire department to existing homeless resource 342 centers and the impact that a new homeless resource center has on the ability of the fire 343 department to provide services to other parts of the city. 344 345 3. Information regarding the number of civil enforcement cases associated with 346 existing homeless resource centers, including the types of complaints, and the estimated impact 347 to civil enforcement workloads and ability to provide services to other parts of the city. 348 349 4. Information regarding accessibility of the site and its impact on public services. 350 351 5. The city provides an updated website to provide any and all city departments to 352 contact for various complaints such as graffiti, encampment clean up, enforcement issues, and 353 any other identified city service that may address impacts on the neighborhood from homeless 354 resource centers. 355 356 6. Data provided by the State Homeless Management Information System and the 357 SL Valley Coalition to end homelessness regarding similar uses in Salt Lake County, including 358 the total number of facilities, the total number of people who use the facilities, the number of 359 individuals served with overnight tenancy in each facility, the average percentage of occupancy 360 of the facilities, and the number of nights per year that the other facilities are at capacity to the 361 extent that the information is available. 362 363 7. Data regarding the total number of beds available to people experiencing 364 homelessness and the estimated number of people currently experiencing homelessness to the 365 extent that the information is available. 366 D. Additional Factors to Consider: In making a decision regarding a petition to map the 367 homeless resource center overlay district, the planning commission and city council shall 368 consider the following factors, in addition to those factors identified elsewhere in 21A.50: 369 370 1. The anticipated benefits to people experiencing homelessness provided by the 371 facility in the proposed location. 372 2. The proximity of support services that benefit people who may use the facility 373 and the ability of people to access services from the proposed location. If services are not within 374 walking distance of the proposed facility, consideration of a transportation plan connecting 375 support services to the facility. 376 3. The ratio of homeless related services provided in Salt Lake City compared to 377 other jurisdictions in Salt Lake County. 378 4. The anticipated impact to city services, including fire,police, and any other city 379 department that would be involved in providing services to the facility and the impact, if any, to 380 the city providing services in other parts of the city. 381 5. The proximity to other homeless resource centers. 382 6. The effectiveness of the security and operations plan provided by the petitioner to 383 address impacts created by the homeless resource center. 384 7. Equity between different neighborhoods in providing homeless resource centers 385 and other locations of impactful land uses. High impact land uses are those land uses that 386 produce higher levels of pollution than the permitted uses in the underlying zone, land uses that 387 attract crime or produce public nuisances, and land uses that are located by a government entity 388 or authorized by a government entity and that are not subject to the land use regulations of the 389 city. 390 8. Demonstrated compliance with the requirements of 21A.36.350. 391 SECTION 6. Renumbering Section 21A.50.060. That Section 21A.50.060 "Limitation 392 on Amendments" is hereby renumbered to Section 21A.50.070 of the Salt Lake City Code. 393 SECTION T Adopting Section 21A.50.080. That Section 21A.50.080 of the Salt Lake 394 City Code shall be and hereby is adopted as follows: 395 21A.50.080: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. 396 The city council may consider applying requirements through an appropriate legal agreement 397 with a petition for a zoning amendment when the city council determines that such an agreement 398 is necessary to increase the benefit of the proposed zoning amendment and/or to address 399 potential impacts to city services, surrounding land uses,public safety, and the health of current 400 and future residents, business owners, and visitors to the city. The agreement may modify any 401 applicable requirement of this Title provided the modification was proposed to and considered 402 by the planning commission as required for any zoning amendment. Agreements that constrain 403 the development potential or land uses of the subject property compared to what is authorized in 404 the proposed zoning district are not required to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to 405 consideration of the agreement. 406 SECTION 8. Renumbering Section 21A.50.070. That Section 21A.50.070 "Appeal of 407 Decision" is hereby renumbered to Section 21A.50.090 of the Salt Lake City Code. 408 SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.020. That Section 21A.60.020 of 409 the Salt Lake City Code shall be amended to include the following term: 410 Homeless Resource Center(Temporary) 411 SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21A.60.040. That definitions of the terms 412 "Homeless Resource Center" and"Homeless Shelter"be amended as set forth below and the 413 term"Homeless Resource Center(Temporary)"be added to Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake 414 City Code as follows: 415 HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER: A building or portion thereof which contains sleeping 416 facilities for those experiencing homeless and operates year round. The facility may contain 417 related services such as bathing, eating, laundry facilities, housing case management, medical 418 care and treatment; behavioral and mental health counseling; employment counseling; 419 educational instruction, and/or vocational training as defined in Utah State Code or its successor. 420 HOMELESS SHELTER: See the definition of Homeless Resource Center. 421 HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER(Temporary): A building or portion thereof which contains 422 sleeping facilities for no more than 150 people per night experiencing homelessness and operates 423 for no more than 180 consecutive days or a total of 180 days in a calendar year between October 424 1 and April 30th of the following year. The facility may contain related services such as bathing, 425 eating, laundry facilities,housing case management,medical care and treatment; behavioral and 426 mental health counseling; employment counseling; educational instruction, and/or vocational 427 training as defined in Utah State Code or its successor. 428 SECTION 11. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 429 first publication. 430 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,this day of , 431 2023. 432 433 CHAIRPERSON 434 435 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 436 437 438 CITY RECORDER 439 440 Transmitted to Mayor on 441 442 443 Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. 444 445 446 MAYOR 447 448 CITY RECORDER 449 (SEAL) 450 APPROVED AS TO FORM 451 Bill No. of 2023. salt Lake City Attorney's office 452 Published: Date: January 11,2023 453 Ordinance Adopting Homeless Resource overlay District By: Mw'L 454 Katherine D.Pasker,Senior City Attorney 455 456 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Comments Received After Publication of PC Staff Report 1. Project Chronology PROJECT CHRONOLGY PETITIONS: PLNPCM2022-01068 June 16, 2022 Community Council Focus Group July 5, 2022 Advocates for People Experiencing Homelessness Focus Group July 6, 2022 Service Provider Focus Group July 25, 2022 Business Community Focus Group July/August 2022 Allison Dupler(Homeless Strategies and Outreach Coordinator)met with people experiencing homelessness at both HRCs, the Rescue Mission, and Nomad Alliance supply drive. A total of 68 people provided input. October 15, 2022 Online Open House from October 15th-November 30th, 2022 November 1, 2022 Facebook Live Event November 10, 2022 Open House November 9, 2022 Planning Commission Briefing December 14, 2022 Planning Commission Public Hearing 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-01068 On December 14, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted to recommend approval of the proposed Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District by the City Council. A petition initiated by the City Council through Ordinance 15B of 2022 to establish a process for approving future homeless resource centers in the city,modifies existing standards for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters, and make other necessary and related modifications to Title 21A Zoning. The proposal includes adopting the Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District, modifying section 21A.36.350 Standards for Homeless Resource Centers, adding provisions for temporary/seasonal homeless resource centers that incorporate recent changes to Utah Code,modifying chapter 21A.50 to add factors to consider when mapping the homeless resource center overlay and other related changes,and modifying defined terms. The City Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 2 1 A Zoning as part of this proposal. As part of their study,the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petitions. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak.The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TBD TIME: 7:00 PM PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street,Room 326,Salt Lake City,Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means,while also providing for an in- person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street,Room 326,Salt Lake City,Utah. For more information,including WebEx connection information,please visit www.slc.i!ov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments(aslc2ov.com.All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file,please call Kelsey Lindquist(385) 226-7227 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m, Monday through Friday, or via email at kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.co ,by selecting the"planning"tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-01068 People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.commentskslcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. Original Petition 4. Public Comments After Publication of PC Staff Report December 14, 2022 Sugar House COMMUNITY COUNCIL TO: Salt Lake City Planning Commission FROM: Judi Short, First Vice Chair and Land Use Chair, Sugar House Community Council RE: PLNPCM2022-01068 Homeless Resource Center Code Amendments I am sorry that I cannot be in attendance at the meeting December 14. We have moved our regular Sugar House Community Council meeting to December 14 because Mayor Mendenhall is able to-be present. We agree that the use shall be suspended for 180 days. And we agree that Option 2 Equity,and Option 3 Options,should be taken through the public process. This can be resolved during the 180 days. Part of the public process should include engaging with the unsheltered residents in the city. Finances need to be a consideration when determining a site and a provider.What if you said that no HRC can be located within 1.5 miles of another HRC instead of"areas that contain an HRC" It may not always be possible to require that they don't exist in areas where these type of uses already exist. Is that one per Zoning code,one per block? You could define an area(s)where an HRC could not be mapped. You could stipulate that a zoning map amendment take no longer than 6 months from date of application to approval.You need to come up with a list of all things the HRC is responsible for,spell them out, and include things that all the other agencies are doing. Come up with a list of all the things the various agencies and HRCs are responsible for,and make them all responsible for all of it. There is a pretty good list in this staff report.This might eliminate the silos,where staff are doing their exact job description, not looking out for the whole community. Make them all responsible. Everyone is responsible for all of it,or the whole team fails.Try to locate services where the people who need it will be,to avoid extra travel time,which may be difficult to schedule and still keep the regular work schedule of that individual. Find out why some providers work, like the YWCA,while others fail. Have the good ones work to train the others. Set this up so they are all on the same team. We know with different pots of gold to fund this,that may be more difficult, but maybe all the gold goes into the same pot,and the GOLD QUEEN doles it out based on results.Then, make a list of everything people experiencing homelessness need. Decide how that will be determined,and who will monitor the success.Quarterly,get the team together to assess how it is working. I think what bothers me the most about this, is that you are arranging the deck chairs,and when you get through,you might have another ship or two, but you still haven't solved the problem. The problem is that surrounding every HRC there is chaos. People hang out outside the building. Others show up to hang out with those who are hanging out.Still more come because there might be someone in the crowd who needs a fix. And maybe some in the crowd are looking for a fix. And people throw their trash on the ground,whether it is in front of the HRS,or two blocks away, because no one is showing them that is not the expected way to behave. And the neighborhood around the HRS is not happy. Have someone assigned to talk to the neighbors. My recommendation to you is that as part of your approval process for this tonight,or next week,you come up with a deadline for when all of these various teams and providers all over the city(medical,social workers,cooks, launderers,job trainers,job providers, janitors,etc.) have a clear-cut plan in place to make this happen,with criteria to tell them if they are winning or losing. And,these criteria must be in place BEFORE the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. And then each HRC reports to the city quarterly,or twice a year. Hold people accountable. And you,as a Planning Commission,ask for reports from time to time,to find out how things are working,or not working. /Salt Lake City/Housing/Homeless/SHCC Letter to PC Homeless 2022 COMMENTS FROM SHCC REGARDING HOMELESS SHELTER TEXT AMENDMENTS I may be reading this proposal wrong, as I did it fairly quickly, but here are my thoughts: The Overlay District proposal seems to be a way to get any request for a Resource Center or Shelter to require a Zoning Text Amendment. It would not allow new Resource Centers or Shelters in any district any more as a conditional use so therefore not at all any more. I like the new requirements for any new Resource Center or Shelter as it includes all the stuff we wanted 5(or more) years ago when they were first proposed. The Overflow proposal also seems OK except for the use of an unused government building,with no limits on location, that I could discern.That might be problematic,though I think the Capitol when the Legislature is not in session is a great solution. Hope this makes sense. We can't continue to have floating overflow shelters thrown together at the last second. Lynn Schwartz Judi, I am in support of item 1, prohibiting new homeless resource centers or shelters in Salt Lake City. It will provide the city with the ability to have more control over where these facilities are located in the city. I look forward to leaming more about items 2 and 3.Thanks, Becky Davis I guess I agree with the mayors prohibition of new permanent shelters, since apparently there wasn't a way to require adequate screening of all issues before the big hubbub about the one proposed near the VOA site. But can you have homeless shelters with total elimination of problems rather than reduction? With regard to 2&3, 1 have a lot of questions. Think it's a great idea to have Andrew J come to address the issue. With regard to the temporary shelter requirements,they would seem quite stringent and expensive depending. I wonder if there were really a lot of problems when there was the temporary shelter in the old DI building. If there were, I certainly wasn't aware,and I went to the area all the time. I daresay you know if there were problems. Thea Brannon It is too complicated for me as I am not acquainted with all the issues of the current rules or changes requested, etc. I have to trust that those on the city council have carefully studied the issue and this is the best current solution and that the rules if adopted are reversible in the future if the situation changes. I would like to know Amy Fowlers views. I can voice my philosophy about the issue of homelessness. Resources should be provided by all shelters. Shelters should be dispersed in the city. Maybe Sugar House should have a shelter to spread the problem and wake people up to being a bit kinder and more human and willing to help. Other cities should provide shelters.West Valley is larger than SLC and yet they don't have one. It is a county and state issue and not just a city issue. State and county funds should come to SLC if other cities are not willing to proportionately share in the cost. Every winter we have a crisis of getting people inside. There should be a plan in place as to where this will be and it should be done in the summer and just planned for. What to do about those who don't want to come into a shelter in any weather. Many of these people are with mental health issues,fear of robbing what they have,abuse, ptsd,drugs etc. I am talking about those in the encampments in parks like Sugar House or the Jordan River Parkway. These people want to be outside with their community of neighbor campers who share a meal or protect their things. I think the city should have a sponsored campground which is much cheaper than a structure . It can have requirements for admittance, resident hosts, resources, Toilet and shower facilities, dish washing, student health clinic, policing and a place to build a warm fire. All much cheaper and acceptable than the current situation of encampments.. Community Volunteers can help, residents can clean and there can be green areas, trees, picnic tables. This is where some people feel safe and we should admit it. Homeless is a medical, social, poverty issue and there are many ways to help. Many will disagree with me but we know there are those who will not go to shelters, permanent or temporary. This issue should be addressed by those planning and developing rules for the homeless.Suzanne S. Stensaas Judi, I just have one concern about the Homeless Resource Center Amendments and maybe it's because I am unaware of how the new facilities will be paid for from the point of acquiring the land on which to build a new facility or to remodel 1 an existing facility. I know the state legislature has appropriated money to address the homeless problem in the state, but its not enough money. So entities who want to open and operate a new Homeless Resource Center could apply for federal, state or city/county funds to accomplish this as well as use donations if the entity is a non-profit organization. Under the submittal requirements, one requirement is "Identified funding sources to operate the facility and any anticipated funding requests made to the city to operate the facility" I assume some of the new resource centers will be run by government entities, so taxpayers will foot the bill. I'm concerned about private entities running into financial difficulties trying to operate homeless resource centers if they don't get grants or governmental funding that they may need to cover their financial obligations. BECKY D"IS Homeless Resource Center Zoning Cindy cromer Wed 12/14/2022 4.52 PM To:cindy cromer To members of the SLC Planning Commission Re Homeless Resource Centers-Zoning December 14, 2022 First I want to point out that my neighborhoods...Central City and Bryant....are not receiving equitable treatment. The staff report does mention the East Downtown but Central City hosts the Geraldine King HRC and both Central City and Bryant have abundant group homes, transitional housing, drug treatment facilities, and so forth. One of the many iterations of Odyssey House is next to one of my 4-plexes. The residents at the House of Hope walk past my commercial building every day. Secondly, I look at the proposed timeline for establishing possible sites with dismay. Dealing with real estate in Salt Lake is like being Captain Hook with the crocodile haunting you with tick-tock, tick-tock. I cannot imagine a seller holding his or her breath while the potential buyer goes through the process of finding out if the site will work. And the ambiguity will drain the resources of the well-intentioned organization hoping to get permission. And some of you may remember the proposal for a HRC on Simpson Avenue and the upheaval it caused in that Sugar House neighborhood. I don't see the proposed timeline working for any of the parties involved. As someone who worried about whether one of the HRCs would be located near one of my own investments, seriously worried, I cannot support the ambiguity in the location of facilities. I completed the questionnaire on-line and indicated that I didn't see the proposed timeframe working for anyone, not the seller, not the purchaser, and certainly not the residents and business owners. Listening for the tick-toc of costly time slipping away is not helpful for anyone; worrying that the biggest investment you've ever made could be undermined is very stressful. Item C2 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023 RE: 792 West goo South&875 South 800 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2022-00587 MOTION i(adopt with restrictive covenant) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance including that the Applicant record a restrictive covenant limiting building height to 35 feet. MOTION 2 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ,,, ,V I'n u ,,,,, Item Schedule: Briefing:April 4,2023 TO: City Council Members Set Date:April 4,2023 Public Hearing:April 18,2023 FROM: Brian Fullmer Potential Action:May 2,2023 Policy Analyst DATE: May 2, 2023 RE: 792 West goo South&875 South 800 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2022-00587 PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE The petitioner was the only person to speak at the April 18, 2023 public hearing. He reiterated his commitment to develop modest sized missing middle housing that fits in the neighborhood.In addition,he reminded the Council of a deed restriction limiting height to 35 feet he recorded against the property with the City as beneficiary.The Council closed the hearing and deferred action to a future meeting. Although the petitioner recorded a deed restriction on the properties,the City Attorney's Office recommended a restrictive covenant be recorded limiting building height to 35 feet if the Council is supportive of the zoning map amendment. The following information was provided for the April 18,2023 public hearing.It is included again for background purposes. BRIEFING UPDATE During the April 4, 2023 briefing Council Members discussed potential alternative zoning that might be more appropriate for the subject parcels. Planning staff noted multi-family developments on small lots is difficult, and the proposed R-MU zoning designation is one of the few zones that does not require larger setbacks than would be possible on these small parcels.The petitioner stated there are utility easements on the south and west sides of the parcels that effectively act as setbacks. If approved,the petitioner would likely need to seek a planned development prior to construction of the proposed fourplexes to reduce required minimum lot widths. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 The need for more density in the area was discussed,along with a desire for more family housing rather than the proposed one-bedroom units. The following information was provided for the April 4, 2023 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for parcels at 792 West goo South and 875 South 800 West in City Council District Two from their current M-1(Light Manufacturing)zoning designation to R-MU(Residential/Mixed-Use).The petitioner's stated objective is to construct a fourplex on each of the two vacant parcels.This use is not permitted under current zoning. The parcels are located on the southwest corner of 800 West and goo South.Area zoning is a mix of M-1, R-MU/R-MU-35 (Residential/Mixed-Use), and R-1/5,000 (Single-family Residential)as shown in the zoning map below.Council Members may recall approving a similar zoning change from M-1 to R-MU-35 to a nearby parcel at 805 South 800 West in summer 2022. Most parcels on the east half of the block were rezoned to R-MU a few years ago.The exception is a parcel on the northeast corner of Genesee Avenue and 70o West where the Summum religious organization is located.That parcel is zoned M-1. Although zoned M-1,most parcels on the east side of 800 West between 800 South and goo South are single-family residences. Parcels on the west side of 800 West in this area are primarily single-family residences in keeping with their R-1/5,000 zoning. Planning staff discussed the requested zoning designation with the petitioner and encouraged him to consider other zoning districts such as R-MU-35 with what Planning believed have development regulations more compatible with Westside Master Plan policies,and with existing development on surrounding parcels.The petitioner chose to pursue the rezone to R-MU. The Planning Commission staff report says the proposed zoning map amendment does not meet three of the four applicable zoning amendment standards(shown in the table later in this report),and Planning staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning map amendment at its February 8, 2023 meeting. Commissioners asked the petitioner why he is not considering R-MU-35 zoning. He said additional setbacks,and parking requirements would make development on these small parcels difficult.The petitioner stated he plans to provide off-street parking,but the lot sizes will not allow one space per dwelling unit required in R-MU-35 zoning. (It is worth noting the City right-of-way extends approximately 12 feet from the sidewalk on the subject parcels.While there is no required front,side yard,or corner side yard setback for multi-family residential uses in the R-MU zoning district,these rights-of-way would effectively function as setbacks if the zoning map amendment is approved by the Council.) The petitioner also stated he voluntarily placed a deed restriction on the parcels limiting building height to 35 feet to minimize impact to nearby single-family homes. Buildings up to 6o feet high are allowed by right in the existing M-1 zoning district and up to 75 feet for residential uses (45 feet for non-residential)within the proposed R-MU zoning. It was mentioned that a deed restriction placed by the property owner could also be removed by him,which would provide little guarantee building heights would be limited to 35 feet. Page 12 There was a discussion about potentially working with the petitioner on a development agreement to limit building height to 35 feet.The Council could discuss this with the petitioner. The Commission held a public hearing at which no one spoke and voted 6-5 to forward a positive recommendation to the Council.Those who voted in support of the recommendation cited the need for housing,recent rezoning to R-MU of large parcels to the east,and the area master plan is several years old. Commissioners voting against the recommendation expressed concerns with the proposal not meeting three of the four standards for zoning changes,and a hesitance voting to recommend a zoning change without a proposed development and/or plans to consider. g 800 South N R-MU-35 I I e0 M.,I 1 11 IL w E R-1-5000 Genesee Avenue R-1-5000 cR R-MU-35 R-1-5000 c M-1 1 � — 900 South- 30 0 os rMR-1-55000 Area zoning map with subject parcels outlined in red.Note-the green area to the south is the 9-Line Trail. Goal of the briefing:Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to ask the petitioner if the proposed dwelling units would be for sale or for rent. 2. The Council may wish to ask the petitioner if he is willing to enter into a development agreement with the City limiting building height to 35 feet. 3. The Council may wish to discuss with the Attorney's office if a stronger tool than a development agreement,such as a restrictive covenant that runs with the land,would provide greater confidence that future developments would not exceed 35 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Given the subject parcel sizes,it is unlikely a building could be constructed to heights approaching what is allowed under the current M-1 zoning(up to 65 feet), or the proposed R-MU zoning(up to 75 feet for residential use)unless the parcels are combined with adjacent parcels. Page 13 Under the proposed R-MU zoning designation,minimum lot width is 50 feet for multi-family buildings. The parcels are approximately 29 feet wide. If the request is approved by the Council,the petitioner would need to have planned development approval from the Planning Commission to construct multi-family buildings. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property.No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council's authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property,not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 4-7 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis,please see the staff report. Consideration i-Westside Master Plan Guidance The subject parcels are in the area covered by the Westside Master Plan, adopted in 2014. Planning staff stated: While the Westside Master Plan supports unique and compatible ways to add incremental density through infill development,it states that infill development should adhere to the prevailing development pattern in the immediate area—which in this particular area is predominantly single family residential.New development should not change the character of the neighborhood,rather, it should be a complement to the areas of opportunity identified in the Westside Master Plan. The Planning Commission staff report acknowledges current M-1 zoning allows heights and uses are incompatible with surrounding development and what the master plan calls for.The master plan identifies the subject vacant parcels as appropriate for medium-density rather than high-density housing.The Planning Commission staff report indicated R-MU zoning would allow development incompatible with the specific area. Information from other City plans reviewed for this petition is included in Attachment D(pages 30-32) of the Planning Commission staff report. Consideration 2-Compatibility with Adjacent Properties Development along Boo West is primarily single-family residential,with some R-MU-35 on the west side of the street to the north. As noted above,the Planning Commission staff report states existing M-1 zoning is not compatible with surrounding properties,nor is the proposed R-MU zoning designation.The report calls for a zoning district that provides"...attractive,compatible, and moderate density,mixed-use development with an emphasis on pedestrian scale activity while maintaining compatibility with the existing development pattern of the area. ZONING COMPARISON M-1 (Existing) R-MU(Proposed) Maximum Building Height 65 feet 75 feet for residential uses 45 feet for non-residential uses Front Setback 15 feet None required Page 14 Side Setback Corner side yard:15 feet Corner side yard:None required Interior side yard:none required Interior:None required Rear Setback None required 25%of lot depth but need not exceed 30 feet. Lot Size Minimum lot area: io,000 square feet No minimum required for multi- Minimum lot width:8o feet family residential. (Lots legally existing as of April 12, Minimum lot width:50 feet 1995 are considered legal conforming (Would need planned development for lots.) multi family residential.) Analysis of Factors Attachment E(pages 33-34)of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal.The standards and findings are summarized below.In brief,Planning staff felt the proposed R-MU zoning is potentially higher density,and a more intense land use than is appropriate for the area.Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent Does not comply with the purposes,goals,objectives,and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the Does not comply specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will Does not comply affect adjacent properties Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent Not applicable with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. The adequacy of public facilities and services Complies intended to serve the subject property,including,but not limited to,roadways,parks and recreational facilities,police and fire protection,schools, stormwater drainage systems,water supplies,and wastewater and refuse collection. City Department Review During City review of the petitions,no responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal,but stated additional review and permits would be required if the property is developed. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • June 8, 2022-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • June 30, 2022-Petition assigned to Kaitlynn Harris, Principal Planner. Page 15 • September 21, 2022-Information about petition sent to Poplar Grove and Glendale Community Council Chairs,and surrounding neighbors and property owners. Project posted to City website for an online open house. o The Poplar Grove Community Council provided a letter supportive of the proposed zoning map amendment. • January 27, 2023-Planning Commission public hearing notice posted on property. o Public hearing notice mailed to surrounding neighbors and property owners,and posted to City website. • February 8, 2023-Planning Commission public hearing.The Planning Commission voted 6-5 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • February 8, 2023-Ordinance requested from Attorney's Office. • March 1, 2023-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney's Office. • March lo, 2023-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Page 16 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending the zoning of property located at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-I Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00587 (the "Petition"). WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission(the "Planning Commission") held a public hearing on February 8, 2023 on the Petition submitted by Cameron Broadbent ("Applicant") to rezone two parcels located at 792 West 900 South(Tax ID No. 15-11-277-009) and 875 South 800 West(Tax ID No. 15-11-277-008) (collectively the "Property") from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District; WHEREAS, at its February 8, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (the "City Council") on the Petition; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property, identified on Exhibit"A" attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from M-I Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District. SECTION 2. Condition. This ordinance is conditioned upon the Applicant recording a restrictive covenant, in a form approved by the city attorney, to limit the height of any building on the Property to 35 feet. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed not to publish or record this ordinance until the condition set forth in Section 2 is satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: April 28, 2023 Bill No. of 2023. By: Published: Katherine D.Pas er,Senior City Attorney Ordinance amending zoning map at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned: 792 West 900 South Street Tax ID No. 15-11-277-009 The South 29 feet of Lot 24,25, and 26, CUMMINGS SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2,PLAT"C", Salt Lake City Survey, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. 875 South 800 West Street Tax ID No. 15-11-277-008 Commencing 29 feet North of the Southwest corner of Lot 26, CUMMINGS SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2, PLAT "C" Salt Lake City Survey; running thence North 28 feet; thence East 80 feet; thence South 28 feet; thence West 80 feet to the point of beginning, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. ERIN MENDENHALL L DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor �' � and NEIGHBORHOODS �' =x Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ach tto(Mar10,202315:10MST) Date Received.• 3/10/2023 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 3/10/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 10, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director Department of Community&Neighborhoods SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2022-00587 Zoning Map Amendment at 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W STAFF CONTACT: Katilynn Harris, Principal Planner katilynn.harris@slcgov.com or(801) 535-6179 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the proposed Zoning Map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a request by Cameron Broadbent, the property owner, to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Map from M-1 Light Manufacturing to R-MU Residential Mixed-Use at 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W. The proposed zoning map amendment is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. The applicant has indicated one of the reasons for proposing the R-MU zone is because of the flexibility the zone provides related to setback and parking requirements—there is no front, corner, or interior side yard setback and there is no off-street parking requirements for multi-family in the R-MU zone. No development plans have been submitted at this time. If the amendment is approved, the applicant could develop the site with any permitted or conditional use in accordance with the R-MU zoning standards. The request did not require a master plan amendment. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O.BOX 145487,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 The Westside Master Plan is the applicable community plan for this property. The property is located in the 700 West industrial corridor which is a swath of development consisting of mostly industrial uses abutting single-family homes between 800 South and approximately 1400 South. At its widest, the corridor is about a quarter-mile wide and extends as far west as 800 West. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at a public hearing on February 8, 2023. The commission determined that the request improves density with minimal neighbor complaint,meets Salt Lake City's goals of a variety of housing types, and improves air quality. The commission voted(6-5)to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council to amend the zoning map as requested. \ r s ■.MU.IS � . �' gin:;• t�- .. .... ,_�� �� k , t 14104 a,s000 r•, ni Subject properties are highlighted in red � PUBLIC PROCESS: • September 21, 2022—Early notification was sent to the Poplar Grove and Glendale Community Councils. Poplar Grove Community Council sent a letter of support dated December 12, 2022 which is attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report. • September 21, 2022—Early notification was sent to all residents and property owners within 300 FT of the subject properties. Staff received two emails in support of the rezone. • September 2022—January 2023 —An online open house was held for the proposal • February 8, 2023 —Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to amend the zoning map for the subject properties from M-1 to R-MU to the City Council for their review and decision. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS of FEBRUARY 8, 2023: Planning Commission A eg nda Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amending the zoning of property located at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-I Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00587 (the "Petition"). WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission(the "Planning Commission") held a public hearing on February 8, 2023 on the Petition submitted by Cameron Broadbent to rezone two parcels located at 792 West 900 South(Tax ID No. 15-11-277-009) and 875 South 800 West (Tax ID No. 15-11-277-008) (collectively the "Property") from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District; WHEREAS, at its February 8, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (the "City Council") on the Petition; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city's best interests. NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property, identified on Exhibit"A" attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from M-I Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL) Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date.March 1, 2023 0-4 Bill No. of 2023. By: Published: Katherine D.Pas er,Senior City Attorney Ordinance amending zoning map at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned: 792 West 900 South Street Tax ID No. 15-11-277-009 The South 29 feet of Lot 24,25, and 26, CUMMINGS SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2,PLAT"C", Salt Lake City Survey, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. 875 South 800 West Street Tax ID No. 15-11-277-008 Commencing 29 feet North of the Southwest corner of Lot 26, CUMMINGS SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2, PLAT "C" Salt Lake City Survey; running thence North 28 feet; thence East 80 feet; thence South 28 feet; thence West 80 feet to the point of beginning, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. I. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Project Chronology Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W—PLNPCM2022-00587 June 8,2022 Cameron Broadbent,the property owner, filed the Zoning Map amendment application. The subject property is located at 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W and encompasses approximately 0.10 acres(4,561 square feet). June 30,2022 Application assigned to Katilynn Harris, Principal Planner. September 21,2022 Sent notifications to Popular Grove Community Council, Glendale Community Council, and surrounding neighbors and property owners. Project posted to city website for an online Open House. January 27, 2023 Sign posted on subject property. Public hearing notice sent out and posted to city website. February 3,2023 Public input period closed. February 8,2023 The Planning Commission held a public hearing and with a 6-5 vote, forwarded a positive recommendation to amend the zoning map for the subject property from M-1 to R-MU to the City Council for their review and decision. ,2023 Signed ordinance received from City Attorney's Office. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-00587—Cameron Broadbent,the property owner, is requesting to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Map for the property located at approximately 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W. The proposal would rezone the property from M-1 Light Manufacturing to R-MU Residential Mixed-Use. The subject parcels are approximately.10 acres or 4,561 square feet. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings.No development plans have been submitted at this time. The properties are within Council District 2,represented by Alejandro Puy. (Staff contact: Katilynn Harris at 801-535-6179 or katilynn.harris@slcgov.com). Case number: PLNPCM2022-00587 As part of their study,the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street,Room 326, Salt Lake City,Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means,while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building,located at 451 South State Street,Room 326,Salt Lake City,Utah.For more information,including WebEx connection information,please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at(801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com.All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file,please call Katilynn Harris at 801-535-6179 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at katilynn.harris@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https:Hcitizenportal.slcgov.com/,by selecting the"planning"tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00587. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600,or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION Zoning Map Amendment Salt Lake City Parcels Involved 15112770080000—875 South 800 West COM 29 FT N OF SW COR LOT 26 CUMMINGS SUB OF BLK 2 PLAT C N 28 FT E 80 FT S 28 FT W 80 FT TO BEG 6665-2026 10243-2811 15112770090000-792 West 900 South S 29 FT OF LOTS 24 25&26 CUMMINGS SUB OF BILK 2 PLAT C 5191-0980 6038-07716050-1172 6665-2032 10243-2813 1. Proiect Description This proposal to amend the zoning map is initiated by the property owner and involves two vacant parcels on the corner of 900 South and 800 West which total 0.10 acres. The property is intended to be used for small multi-family housing, duplex,triplex or fourplex, often referred to as the "missing middle" in Salt Lake City planning documents. Several Salt Lake City planning documents have outlined a change in Salt Lake City public policy for this area due to various reasons. These include the ever increasing housing crisis in the city and the associated need for diverse housing options, beatification and utilization of the 9 Line corridor,the need for safe and efficient housing,flexible zoning tools and regulations to meet today's conditions, and the need for effective, high quality, in-fill development. The majority, approximately 80%, of the 700-800 West block face for 900 South is unoccupied land. With over 50%of the block face's zoning being changed in 2020 from M-1 to R-MU, the change in public policy for the block face is clear. This zoning map amendment completes the zoning change for the block face's ONLY remaining vacant parcel. This zoning amendment is supported by the following Salt Lake City planning documents: Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 9 Line Corridor Master Plan, Adopted March 3, 2015 The Westside Master Plan,Adopted December 3, 2014 Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan 1 2017 Executive Summary Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, December 2015 Salt Lake City Westside Transportation Equity Study, 2021 Plan Salt Lake—Salt Lake City I Citywide Vision,Adopted December 1, 2015 1.a Purpose Of The Amendment The purpose of this Zoning Amendment is to continue the work by the owner to beautify 800 West over a three block stretch, 800 South to Fayette Avenue, where the owner has built two new homes in the last three years. The owner desires to provide a custom-designed, custom-built residence appropriately-sized and beautifully landscaped which will offer direct access to recreation, public transit and non-car transportation on an east-west corridor in which the Westside Master Plan considers "in need of the most attention" (p.71 of the Westside Master Plan). The owner has a track record of developing custom, energy-efficient homes built to match the size and period of the surrounding neighborhood which fit in with the community (804 West Genesee and 802 West Fayette). Salt Lake City inspectors and neighbors who've viewed the owner's previous work in its entirety can both attest to the owner's commitment to personally building to the highest standard possible and being onsite during the build process to ensure quality building which enhances the community. Additionally, over the last three years, the owner has planted over 150 trees, shrubs, bushes, grasses and flowers along 800 West via approved landscape plans submitted to the city. 1.b Description Of The Proposed Use Of The Property Being Rezoned "The purpose of the R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District is to reinforce the mixed use character of the area and encourage the development of areas as high density residential urban neighborhoods containing retail, service commercial, and small scale office uses.This district is appropriate in areas of the City where the applicable master plans support high density, mixed use development.The standards for the district are intended to facilitate the creation of a walkable urban neighborhood with an emphasis on pedestrian scale activity while acknowledging the need for transit and automobile access" (SLC Zoning Code). With the 9 Line corridor helping to create a "walkable urban neighborhood," developing these lots with the intent of restoring the "missing middle" living option adds to the mixed use character of the area. While a "hotel" is a permitted use in the M-1 zone for legal lots like this one, the owner believes building a small, multi-family unit brings longer-term residents that better weave into the fabric of the existing community. The owner agrees with the SLC Planning Commission's 2020 allowance for one owner to change most of the block face and all the other vacant parcels to R-MU zoning. The owner believes this zoning is more in harmony with SLC's guiding master plans previously mentioned and shown in "City Goals" section 1.c below. 1.c Reasons Why The Present Zoning May Not Be Appropriate For The Area Reasons are included in the headings: City Goals,Transportation and Equality City Goals With 160 people per day moving to Utah,their presence has become noticeable on our public roads (KSLTV.com, 12/28/2021). If we can create homes for people in places where walkable neighborhood infrastructure and public transit is already in place, we're helping achieve the goals of several SLC master plans. These goals help our community ease car traffic, improve air quality and encourage healthy living. It's interesting to note that the 9 Line corridor plan, which creates a walkable neighborhood connecting the east and west side of downtown SLC, is so important that it's one of the very few streets to ever have its own SLC master plan. Salt Lake City has historically built effective public/private partnerships which began with the city making large infrastructure changes followed by zoning changes to accomplish additional reinvestment in the community. TRAX may be a good example of this. The TRAX installation was followed by zoning changes which introduced development along its corridor thru the city. The city's massive undertaking along the 900 South corridor seems similar to TRAX and offers pedestrian-friendly transportation. With the block face of 900 South between 700-800 West being 80% unoccupied space, it offers the perfect place to make zoning changes which bring additional investment to our community. This change is already underway. Many vacant land owners over several blocks to the east have already changed zoning along the 9 Line corridor. Many city planning documents support this change. Some excerpts below (shown in different fonts,text, etc.) are directly from these documents and are shared in this section "City Goals" for the benefit of those wishing to be more familiar with relevant SLC planning documents. Plan Salt Lake—Salt Lake City I Citywide Vision,Adopted December 1, 2015. Sections below are from pages 9-10: DIVERSE MIX OF USES iiy creating places with a diverse mix of uses,building types,connections,and transportation options, People have the choice of where they live,how they live-and how they get around. As our City grows and evolves overtime,having a diverse mix of uses in our neighborhoods citywide will become increasingly important to accommodate responsible growth and proiide people with real choices. CONNECT IVffY&GIITCULATION Connectivity and circulation are critical to responsible-sustainable growth-we must ensure that our neighborhoods and districts are well connected by both providing a side-range of transportation and mobility options and increasing the number of connections in our community.Smaller blocks and a diversity of connections are necessary to achieve this_ DENSITY Density and compact development are important principles of sustainable growth-allowing for more affordable transportation options and creating vibrant and diverse places. Density in the appropriate locations, including near existing infrastructure, compatible development-and major transportation corridors.can help to accommodate future growth more efficiently.This type of compact development allows people to live closer to where they work,recreate-shop, and carry out their daily lives,resulting in less automobile dependency and greater mobility. COMPA11BILU compatibility of development generally refers to how a development integrates into the existing scale and character of a neighborhood_ New development should be context sensitive to the surrounding develo pment,taking into account the existing character of the neighborhood-AfAle p roAdi ng opportunities for nevi gro,►% h and to enhance the sense of glace. MAXIMIZE PUBLJC INVESTMENTS The cost of public infrastructure investments,such as transit,can be recaptured through new development and increases in density_Transit-oriented development maximizes transit infrastructure benefits through increased ridership and density.This type of development results in more m-alkable, vibrant, and accessible neighborhoods, as well as increases in property values and sales tax revenues for the community. RESPONSIVE&RESILIENT Designing infrastructure and development to be adaptable and responsive to a changing climate and demographic shifts will ensure our community is resilient and meets the changing needs of future generations.This means creating places that are durable and long lasting while being flexible,allo Aing for a diversity of users and uses_ GREEN BUILDING i3reen infrastructure and development should incorporate sustainable building best practices including high performance energy and resource efficiency,renewable energy generation, transit and pedestrian orientation_storm v4-ate and Nn-ater management, and the use of high quality,durable building materials_ "Guiding Principles" from Plan Salt Lake comes from p. 14: GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1/ Neighborhoods that provide a safe environment. 8/A beautiful city that is people focused_ opportunity for social interaction,and services needed for the wellbeing of the c0111111Lrnity therein. 9/Maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past- 2/Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live. how they live.and how they get 10/Vibrant. diverse.and accessible artistic and cultural around_ resources that showcase the community's long standing commitment to a strong creative culture. 3/Access to a wide variety of housing types for all income levels throughout the City. providing the basic human need 11/Ensure access to all City amenities for all citizens while for safety and responding to changing demographics. treating everyone equitably with fairness.justice.and respect- 4/A transportation and mobility network that is safe, accessible.reliable,affordable,and sustainable,providing 12/A balanced economy that produces quality jobs and real choices and connecting people with places_ fosters an environment for commerce. local business,and industry to thrive. 5/Air that is healthy and clean_ 13/A local government that is collaborative, responsive.and 6/Minimize Our impact on the natural environment_ transparent- 7/Protecting the natural environment while providing access and Opportunities t0 recreate and enjoy nature. Plan Salt Lake "Housing Initiatives" below are taken from p.39. PLAN A SALT 1 1.Ensure access ffddablp housing rental ard very km t the ' Of 2.The "missing middle" option, duplex,triplex and fourplex, offers us a way to nwdium ' housing * increase the number of medium density housing options without adversely d optiara affecting the residential community. Encourage housing " ' '` 3.The "missing middle" proposed for the corner of 900 South 800 West would that ' "' '- aging naturally offer ground level living in an approachable living arrangement. r 4-Drec:t new ' 4. Building on the 9 Line corridor offers residents a recreational hub in "people- wimard amw with existiing oriented" housing. frftasbudure that ham the po . . peopIL—oriented Enable-moiffate '= 5.This rezone offers a moderate density increase appropriate for the existing fmmases wfthfn Exi5ting qq neighborhood. appropriate. 6.Promcite eni2rgy&fident housing andFetablftation .f existing housiing u Pronx3te hgh density 7. Public transit and pedestrian-friendly transit are both available to this lot. Fesidffytiial in areas servEd by "Plans Salt Lake" suggests this is the type of residential area appropriate for high density. B.Support Salt Lake City Workforce M Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p.11 &50. The housing crisis also impacts middle-income holds.the historically low vacancy rate of 2 percent in Sa It:La Ire City in 2017 has d riven prices up in every neighborhood_ In marry cases,middle-income households are forced to make the decision to locate in neigh borhoods that they would not otherwise choose, take on greater a mounts of debt or move to another community. In August 2016r Salt Lake City conducted the Sa k Lake Live Work Survey,which included people ;Q„rce 13K HaA,g Mincer SW&?a C. that commuted into the city far work Among these commuters,S2 percent indicated that they would consider living in Salt Lake City if housing weremore Interesting to point out that Growing SLC's findings affordable. Salt Lake City�population grawsby60 percent every day from in- suggested 52%of commuters would consider living in commuters,which creates signficantstress on our transportation network and Salt Lake City if housing were more affordable. the environment Providing more affordable options could greatly reduce these impacts,which are shared by all residents. Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 Composition of SLC residents are shown below (p.14&50) SNAPSHOT SALT LACE: SUMMARY Salt Lake City Residents by Age, Salt Lake City Household Composition,2014 2014 Nearly 4 of every 10 Salt Lake City residers Married couples without children is an adult millennlal(between 18and 34 years old;.Demand for housing In walkable nelghbo rho od5 and non-stngfe family Married couples housing types bythts demographlcwlll 1 with children drive the housing market for the next 1 �eCdde TOTAL '' HOUSFNOLDS One person 75.923 I Single parent In addition,si mi lar housing choice preferences households I I households among the Baby Boomer cohort as they retire will put added pressure on urban types of I Other family housing development- households S�+r.,e:13BC liaivng h+�rk�i Sv�r,3716 g P Multi-person Near1,y one-half of all renters In Salt Lake households Clky are cast-bu rdened,and nearly one- Wage Increase vs.Horne Sale quarter are extremely cost-burdened CgDend Price Increase more-han 50%oP income on rent). Nearly two-thirds of all households in Salt Lake 2011-2014 City are composed of one or two people. Source BBC Housing Market Study,-10 16 Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p. 16 below offers additional "Guiding Principles" appropriating funds. The Salt Lake City Council will support and fund projects that: 1. Adhere to federal-level efforts to encourage a mix of 11. Utilize City-owned land whenever possible. While no public funds are being sought for this income in individual projects and neighborhoods. development, it seems relevant to call out: 12. Enable residernts'success to maintain housing through 2. Uphold an equitable ratio of affordable to market rate partnerships with providers of supportive servicm new units throughout the dty.Ideally,projects outside areas ofhgh opportunity should havelowerratiosof 13. Support tax increment andneghbodhood Point#8 encourages us to call for a spectrum of affordable unit& development goals when utilizing RDA money for housing options for people of all backgrounds and housing development incomes. 3. Incentivine affordable housing within areas of high opportunity. 14. Identify opportunities to expedte City funded projects 4. Award funding through a competitive,aaountable, that are already in the process. Point#16 calls out what some city documents refer fair and transparent process to give all interested 15. Clearty articulate to the community,developers to as the "missing middle." It also encourages developers,agencies and organizations equal and all interested parties options for funding and diversifying housing stock to include this option opportunity to submit proposals for consideration. collaborating with the City on establishingaffordaole which is often not developed.This is due to rising housing in all neighborhoods 5. Incentrvize the preservation and improvement oF development costs bringing about developer's existf ng affordable housing 16, Identify tools to increase and diversify the total housingsupply indudi housing that the focus on multi-story apartment buildings. ppN" n9 ng types 6. Create a net increase in affordable housing units private market does not sufficiently provide such as while: famiy housing in the downtown area,innovatve Point#17 encourages us to include affordable i.Avoiding dispiacement of existing affordable housing types,missing middle housing and middle-to housing options where possible near transit- housing to the extent possible,and low-income apartments. ii_Retaining and expanding the diversity ofAMI oriented development areas. It also encourages and innovative housing17. Indudeaffordable housing in transit-onented tYPes� moderate increases in density along transit developments because access to public transit 7. Keep publicly-funded housing projects affordable as corridors. increases access to opportunities.Moderate increases long as possible. in density should be encouraged along transit 8. Create a spectrum of housing options for people of all corridors- backgrounds and incomes. 18.Include innovative parking solutions especially for 9. Collaborate with the private sector to include projects near public transit to bring down construction affordable units in developments that are planned costs so more affordable housing units can be built or in progress,which otherwise might not have 19. Include quality construction materials,design,and affordable units- i�nurorporate public or private amenities 10. Include collaboration wrth community and private 20.Allow and encourage opportunities for projects to sector partners to enable opportunities for in kind remain at least to some extent on the GtyY tax rolls. contributions,creative financing and service delivery models Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p. 17 & 18 below emphasizes what it believes our#1 goal is together: REPN DI NG TO TH E CRI S I S: I PREHE I I E SOLUTIONS & POLICIES Salt Lake City is witnessing tremendous growth as households are expanding and new housing is being developed. The vision of this planr that Sa It Lake City is a placefora growingdiverse population to find housing opIpcirtunities that are GOAL 1: INCREASE HOUSING OPTIONS. REFORM CITY safe,secure,and enrich lives and communities,recognizes the changing nature of the city,and provides the foundation for creating goals and strategies to manage PRACTICETOPROf�+L4TE,4REPONSI1fE, AFFORABLE, m the housing needseftomorrorrr_Thefollowing pages outline the housing goals, HIGH-OPPORUNITY HOUSING MARKET objective and strategies through which City departments and divisions,and public and private partners can achieve the outcomes identified in Plan Salt Lake and the Comprehensive Housing Policy adopted by the Council in February 2016. In order to respond to Salt Lake City changing demcg raphics and the housing needs of its diverse communities,it is oritical to begin to look within the C"for real and responsive change that will encourage the market to develop the housing and infrastructure needed to accorn modate our g rowing community.This goal focuses on the need to increase the diversity of housing types and opportunities in the city by seeking policy reforms that can enhance the flexibility of the land-use code and create an efficient and pred ictable development process for comm unity growth. Strategic policy decisions that integrate the transportation system,development related infrastructure,financial institutions'and data,as well as innovative deign and construction methods,can break down social and economic segregation,th us building a city for everyone. 0bjective1: Review and modify land-useandzoningregulations 1.1.1 DevalopNxible zoning tools and reguIationsr with a focus along to reflect the affordability needs of a growing, pioneering cit)r significant transportation routes. In order to respond to the demographic shift described above,modernizing Plan Sah Lakes Existing Conditions report shows that the City has not had a zoning is key not only to catching up with the demand,but creating housing that sig nificant update to its zoning code si nee the mid-19g0s.Land use decisions of the responds to every stage of life whether just starti ng out or dowrtsizing later i n Ifie_ 1990s came about as a reaction tothe gradual population decline that occurred Immediate strategies that will be pursued for greatest impact include improving over the preceding three decades.Conversely,the city's population has grown by or expanding on zones that have supported recent housing developmerrr- 20 percent in the last two decades,(the Fastest rate of growh in nearly century) including the Transit Station Area(T5A),Poesidential Mixed-Use T-MU),Sugar House presenting a need fora fundamentally difFerent approach_Household type and Business District(CSHED),Gateway Mixed-Use(GMU)•Central Business District makeup has also significantly changed to reflect smaller household sizes in the city. (El),Dawrrtcwn warehausefResidential District P-31,and newforrn-based zones Increasing fleAbility arou nd dimensiona I requirements and code definitions will (PBUN)_InadditiorL there isa need for irrfillordinances that allow for greater reduce barriers to housing construction that are unnecessary for achieving city density in existing neighborhoods,offering owners the option to subdivide large goals,such as neighborhood preservation_A concentrated zoning and land use parcels to increase the uvlity and value of their land,removing impediments to review is warra nted to add ress these critica I issues and to refine code so that it innovative construction types,such as accessory dwel ling un its,a nd red using focuses on farm and scale of development rather than intended use. parking requirements to bring down the cost of developing new housing units` Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p. 19 below mentions the "missing middle" and encourages us to all help with "finding a place for these types [of housing] throughout the city" as they help with "restoring choices for a wider variety of household sizes." 1.1.2 Develop in-fill ordinances that promote a diverse housing stock increase housing options,create redevelopment opportunities,and allow additional units withln existing structuresr while minimizing neighborhood impacts. li In-fill ordinances provide both property owner-,and developers with options to increasethe number of units on particular parcels throughout the city.Such options would also help restorethehnissingmiddle-housingtypeswherenew a'W'"ay"9rn-illhxrrghkEt,nn-d rvt binding dvmghxlf-r coy mans more construction has principally been limited to single-family homes and multistory p3opleareabletofind horrN5in&kLake apartment buildings for decades.Missing middle hauling types are those that OmaqEM-' r current zon ing practices have either dramatically reduced or eliminated a Itogether_ accessary dwelling unit,duplexes,tri-plexes,small multi-pIexes<courtyard cottages and bungalows,row houses and small apartment buildings.Finding a place far these housing types throug hout the city means more housing options in Sa It Lake City,and restori ng choices for a wider va riety of household sizes,from seniors to young families. 41 you are rave Id E WE W!"I I D E P.10 of the Westside Master Plan shows how the "missing middle" zoning (duplex zoning) represents just 2%of total zoning (2014). The residential zoning districts form the core of the study area, between 900 West and Redwood Road and from 1-80 south to 1700 South. Of the 1,020 acres of residential zoning in the Westside. 89 percent is zoned for single-family development(including the community's two mobile home developments). Another two percent for duplexes and the remaining nine percent for multi-family development Well over one-half of the Westside's 90 acres of multi-family zoning is contained in jest six developments, all within two blocks of either Redwood 9%MULTI-FAMILY Road or 1700 South.Not only does the Westside lack multi- 2% DUPLEX family housing options, but the options that are there are not well integrated into the rest of the community. The industrial zoning districts, and a majority of the commercial ones, surround the neighborhoods on the east west and south sides. The open space zoning, which + 89% SINGLE FAMILY is almost entirely composed of the Jordan River Parkway BrealcicwnofYYsrft e'sres laming. and the communityls parks,is centrally located through the middle of the residential community P.10 of the Westside Master Plan suggests the Westside would benefit from better integrating multifamily into the rest of the community rather than repeating the past and concentrating it so heavily (50%+) in just six developments. - Qi t� P. 33 of the Westside Master Plan mentions, "There are also several vacant or underutilized parcels that can be developed as infill parcels, and, depending on their size, can be seen as opportunities for multi-family projects." L "Multi-family residential infill will require some zoning ordinance modification" (p.33). P. 34 of the Westside Master Plan also suggests that"infill development adhere to the prevailing development pattern in the immediate area." More than 50%of the block face of 900 South was recently rezoned to a Residential Mixed Use (R-MU); this is clearly an undeniable pattern. The proposed zoning change is in line with that pattern of development on the existing block face. Furthermore,the Westside Master Plan encouraged the Salt Lake Planning Division to "Explore regulatory options for allowing two-or multi-family development" where appropriate. It also mentioned that it would be helpful to "add even a small amount of additional density without impacting the prevailing single-family character of the Westside and potentially introduce unique housing types and designs to the community or the city" (p.34). This rezone allowing for development of the "Missing Middle" helps achieve the recommendation to the Salt Lake Planning Division by adding just a small amount of additional density that's in harmony with the character of the existing community. P.69-71 of the Westside Master Plan speaks specifically of the 700 West corridor(Gateways & Industrial Districts): The 700 West corridor is between I-1 S and 800 West from 800 South to approximately 1700 South.Despite having only 20 percent of the industrial land in the community,the 700 West corridor is important because it forms the eastern edge of Glendale and Poplar Grove and is the gateway for three of the traditional neighborhood entrances: 800 South,900 South and 1300 South. It abuts single-family neighborhoods and schools,creating an uneven and undesirable transition and an unattractive gateway. In terms of redevelopment, the most important section of the corridor is between 800 South and 1400 South,a distance just under a mile. Both the pattern and quality of development vary in the corridor and the industrially- zoned areas sit directly across either 700 Nest or 800 West from residential properties.There are a couple of small, nonconforming industrial properties mixed in with homes but otherwise, there is a clear division between the districts. Garen the goal of increasing the community's residential density, there are opportunities for infill mufti- fa milydevelopments for residents who seek urban neighborhaadswith an industrial appeal.The proximity to Doismtowrn the Jordan River and the 9 Line nail all make the area attractive to many residents. Between 800 South and 1700 South, there are approximately 75 acres of land on either side of this segment of the corridor that are vacant or underdeveloped. Assuming any individual site is not contaminated and with the appropriate building configurations and buffering from the railroad corridor, this land could be redeveloped as multi-family housing.A conservative multi-family density of 25 units per acre and a complete transformation of this land would yield over 2,000 new dwelling units.There is also opportunity for low-density infill projects on lots that are vacant but not big enough for multiple-unit residential development The landscaped medians and street trees on 800 West between 600 South and 900 South have helped create a buffer between the single-family residences and the industrial uses to the east. Such improvements are possible in this section of 900 West because the right-of-way is 90 feet wide.Elsewhere on 800 West and on all of 700 West, the right-of-way width is approximately 45 feet. One option for these smaller rightsrof-way is to disallow on-street parking and install as narrow a median as possible for trees to grow.Additionally,large trees can be planted on the west side of 700 West where industrial uses are adjacent to residential ones.Regardless of the solution,the first step is to install sidewalks,curb and gutter on 800 West and 700 West where they are missing.A majority of the cross streets have all three. GATEWAYS Five of the six routes into the Westside from the east cut through the 700 West corridor.A first-time visitor to the community, using one of these five streets, regardless of their mode of transportation, is first greeted by a land use and development pattern that is not representative of the true character of the community.This is especially problematicwhen two of the community's major assets—the Jordan River andparks on 900 South and the Sorenson Multicultural and Unity Center—are both only a half-mire from their respective gateways.The topic of gateways and their current condition was a frequent point of discussion in public meetings, and some residents believed strongly,that the gateways influenced how people felt about their community.The three gateways that were most commonly cited were 900 South,900 South and 1300 South,but 900 90LIth was generally considered the one in need of the most attention. NWFF ► The visual impact of the 900 South gateway is a result of three factors:the railroad corridor,the interstate and land uses.The latter can be addressed through regulatory and zoning changes in the short-term and redevelopment in the mid-to long-term.The first two factors,however, are barriers that must be mitigated through urban design treatments, infrastructure improvements and landscaping. While there are few realistic methods to mask the impact of the railroad corridor, viaducts provide opportunities to "recapture" these barriers and turn them into welcoming gateway features. _ These gateway also provide opportunities for more community- driven projects. These projects, which may be temporary; simple and inexpensive, should be ongoing installations that the city facilitates and monitors for public safety purposes. otherwise these projects would be the responsibility of residents and stakeholders.Activating public spaces near the gateways is another method of softening the impact of the viaducts.Increasing activity - and attracting people to a more positive public space can become t 4 4 _ = the focus of onel;attention upon entering the Community.A newly- j installed bicycle park on the south side of 900 South at 700 West is one such example.Further detail for the 900 South gateway is presented in the -' corridor plan for the 9 Line. , MOVING FORWARD The "Moving Forward" section to the left comes from E�ire wa}�s to redevelop the 7{}0 +I�est p,73 of the Westside Master Plan. ill ustrial corridor. Permitted Uses. The Planning Division should comprehensively review the uses that are permitted The Planning Division has made the 9 Line corridor a in the current light manufacturing zoning district and priority and work is now underway. determine if a new zone—an industrial park district, for example—maybe more appropriate.A new district ALL infill vacant land (owned by one party) on the block should more specifically regulate building and site face of 900 South 700-800 West has been changed to R- design and should completely prohibit any uses that produce noxious odors, fumes or other discharge or MU, and the owner of the last remaining vacant parcel other uses that rely heavily on outdoor storage. on the block face has requested it now be change to R- MU. hfixedUselnfrfl.The Planning Division should consider permitting residential and commercial infill on vacant 800 West's 90'width makes it a natural buffer between parcels in the corridor. Any infill development with a residential component shall be contingent upon mixed use and residential zoning. Master Plan environmental review Height and bulk regulations recommendations include flexible zoning in this area for infdl development should be as flexible as they are allowing 50 or more dwelling units per acre. for other uses in the zoning district in order to achieve high density development (50 or more dwelling units Even on a national level, the Federal government sees per acre). this area and this lot's entire north side block face (not Curb and Gutter. Salt Lake City should install curbs the south) specifically as a "distressed area." and gutter on all streets in the 700 West corridor where such improvements do not exist. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has placed this block face in what it Si`reetscnpe Changes. The Transportation Division terms the "Opportunity Zone" where it invites owners should consider modifications to the struts on 700 to aid in developing this area for the benefit of the West and $DO West in order to buffer the existing industrial uses from the residential land uses to the Community(https://opportunityzones.hud.gov/resources/map). west.Narrow landscaped medians or large trees on the west side of 700 West are other possibilities. Transportation The current M-1 zoning does not allow for a small, multi-family home despite immediate access to public transit and recreation. With 160 new residents per day arriving, it's clear why the Utah State House Speaker mentioned transportation being the first issue when he commented on the influx of residents. He said, "State leaders are very aware of problems associated with a booming population...growth doesn't have to be the enemy but that Utah needs to be thoughtful with long-term planning for transportation, housing and recreation" (KSLTV.com, 12/28/2021). The Salt Lake City Pedestrian& Bicycle Master Plan suggested that after gathering public import, one of the key themes regarding transportation was a need for better options and "support for conventional and low stress bikeways that are designed well, especially to minimize intersection conflicts" (P. ES-2). The Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan 2017 Executive Summary suggested that "through public outreach efforts for the Transit Master Plan and past SLC planning efforts" transit officials learned that "forty-three percent (43%) of participants in the Design Your Transit System Tool indentified improved access to transit on foot and by bike as a priority" (p.107). Additionally, some age groups that are likely to rent their home (18-36 year old Millennials) are more active, taking 23% fewer driving trips, 16% more walking trips and 24% more biking trips than other households (p.7). "Public transit is also the primary mode of travel for many of the approximately 1 in 10 Salt Lake City residents that have a disability" (p.7). A ground-level home is more accommodating to some disabilities and will naturally be a part of a small, multi-family home. On a health note, obesity rates in Salt Lake County are at approximately 27%. Housing near transit and recreational opportunities increase physical activity and improve health (p.7). A home with direct access to the 9 Line corridor offers this opportunity. The 9 Line Corridor Master Plan mentioned its intent is to function as "An urban thoroughfare and public open space, helping people make connections, reduce barriers, promote healthy lifestyles." Another part of its purpose is to help "a diverse assemblage of people and user groups, [provide]the opportunity for enhancing their connections to the surrounding businesses and neighborhoods that form a unique and attractive community" (p. 9). The rezoning of this underutilized land helps us achieve this vision of bringing a "Diverse assemblage of people"together to use the 9 Line space to connect people to recreation, public transit and the surrounding businesses. Equality Equality is a characteristic woven into Salt Lake City's guiding master plans. The 9 Line Corridor Master Plan (2015) makes mention of reducing barriers and improving physical and cultural connections between the east and west sides of the City that in turn offer regional connections (p. 9). This zoning change helps people connect and reduces the barriers of east-west divide. Growing SLC:A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 mentions the growing disparity between wages and rental rates appears to be creating greater instability in the lives of low-income households (p.10). "The housing crisis also impacts middle-income households" (p.11). Higher income households appear to enjoy more housing stability. This zoning change helps provide lower rents and more stability to both low-and middle-income households with more diverse, quality housing stock in a middle price range. Exacerbating the housing crisis are local barriers to housing development (p.11)... The systemic affordable housing crisis has implications for every Salt Lake City resident and business." Allowing this zoning change will allow for a well-designed, small home for someone wishing to find a nice place to live that's more affordable than what average rents in SLC are currently (RentCafe.com, Zumper.com). The Transportation Equity For Salt Lake City's Westside Study, 2021 shines a light on "Equitable Access" for west and east side Salt Lake City neighborhoods. One example of a benefit many eastside residents enjoy is the variety of several small, multi-family housing options around a major park such as Liberty Park. Additionally,you can bike or walk directly to the park from these small, multi-family options. The same opportunity around the west side's International Peace Gardens is limited. This zoning change brings "Equitable Access"to a housing option that is in limited supply around the park today and makes it accessible via the 9 Line corridor. Impact Why R-MU? • Block face zoning is consistent. Consistency seems important since spot zoning is illegal. It seems the original intent when zoning half the block R-MU was to convert this block(along 900 South) to R-MU. Would it not otherwise be considered spot zoning since there is no other R-MU zoning near this location? • 90' physical road break. With a 90'wide break between the east and west side of 800 West, including a 45' city owned park-like median, it doesn't seem we could find a better place to make a zoning break consistent with the change of the block face zoning started in 2020. • 10' extra. R-MU appears to add just 10'to the current M-1 zoning maximum height of 65'. • Practicality naturally limits height. Some may argue that the 75' height allowance in R-MU is too much for this lot. The reality is that these are two 0.05 acre lots and there is no physical way a 75' building could reasonably be constructed and allow any type of reasonable parking. Additionally, anything over 30' requires the power lines to be buried at a cost estimated to be $2.5Mi1 per an email quote from Scott.Burton@pacificorp.com (Mar/11, 3:45pm). Could some homes be torn down around the lot and developed into something larger?Yes. However, that misses the intent of building the "Missing Middle" on these lots, but it could be possible. If that large of an investment was made by an entity along a pedestrian-centric road with its own master plan dedicated to bringing people to use it,we'd be fortunate to welcome it as 900 South is one of the few entrances to the west side and its further development would be welcomed over the industrial neglect prevalent today. • Missing Middle-This size of lot is ideal for developing the "Missing Middle." • 12' on the south. The property line on the south of these lots is nearly 12' back from the sidewalk. SLC Fire requirements incentivizes owners to set a home back at least an additional 5+feet creating almost a 17' setback; this is the planned setback from which the owner intends to begin designing. • 9' on the west. The property line on the west is nearly 9' back from the sidewalk. While SLC is currently evaluating reducing parking requirements, such requirements have not yet been changed.Therefore, in order to accommodate adequate packing given current requirements of the proposed R-MU zone,the owner intents to pull the building forward to be set approximately 9' back from the sidewalk to meet the rear parking requirements. May we keep in mind that "Form" zoning approved just east a few blocks requires zero off-street parking (i.e., FB-UN2 zone for 278 West 900 South)? Why is this different than the recent rezone of 805 South 800 West to R-MU-35? • SLC made their intentions clear regarding the direction it wanted for 800 South years before the proposed zoning change for 805 S. 800 W. came along recently. Not all individual citizens/home owners sought to change the zoning of their homes to R-MU-35 along 800 South (800-900 West); that change was done by SLC or a small group getting it approved by SLC. It sent a clear message to myself as an existing owner of multiple properties along 800 West (including 804 W Genesee, separated from that zoning change by a 15' alley) and the rest of the community since the mandate was approved by SLC offices. The clear directive was that this would be more density, limited to 35' in height (via R-MU-35 zoning with its required parking of one car per unit). • 1 was the only local citizen in the room when SLC Planning Commission was reviewing the zoning change request for 805 W. 800 S. The Planning Commission indirectly invited the owner to change his proposed zoning request from R-MU-45 to R-MU-35. Those actions were consistent and appropriate since SLC had already made its intentions clear for the area (the expanded block face of I-15 to 900 W) by initiating a zoning change to R-MU-35 years ago. That owner was simply being asked to adjust his request to meet the established pattern previously set. In that meeting, he graciously complied with the informal request before leaving the room. • Similarly, SLC has approved a welcome change to R-MU zoning for 50%of the block face (700-800 W) along a future pedestrian, non-car corridor with its own master plan (the 9 Line Corridor Master Plan). Like the directional change on 800 South,the change on 900 South was set in motion years ago. The actions were clear. The message sent to local citizens was clear. The pattern of development along the respective roads was different, but made clear in the same fashion. As a resident, I read the actions and directions of SLC as a clear change to the area and purchased two lots along the same block face that was zoned R-MU. I've made a decision to invest and beautify this area years ago in a way that goes beyond what is"Required" (details below). I seek R-MU zoning, not R-MU-35 or 45 in its current form. What's the impact to surrounding single-family homes and where has this been done in SLC already? • Along non-car,transit lines (i.e., the pedestrian walkway of 900 South or TRAX line on 200 South), R-MU is a sound zoning choice because it requires at least some parking; this is in comparison to the zero parking requirement of selectively used Form zoning. R-MU is a natural choice over other zoning options when existing lot lines are set back a reasonable distance from the public sidewalk.That's the case with the corner of 900 South 800 West. • There is an example worth noting that is nearby this proposed zoning amendment, namely 900 South 200 West. Form zoning(FB-UN2)turns to R-MU zoning as you move from 900 South 200 West further south and pass a major freeway exit (the 900 South 1-15 exit), shown below. Immediately after a major 1-15 road, R-MU zoning is the first zoning used (1015 South 200 West) on a corner lot with multi-family units. On the other end of the block face is the same R-MU zoning (1075 South 200 West). In-between the two R-MU lots are four one-story, single-family homes which have been zoned RMF-35. In principle & use, this is almost an exact match to what is being proposed with this zoning amendment for the corner of 900 South 800 West. • It's worth noting that at 1075 South 200 West, only 45' separate a R-MU lot from additional one-story, single- family homes to the south. That's half the distance of the existing 90' between this proposed R-MU zoned corner lot of 900 South 800 West and the one-story, single-family homes to the west on 900 South. Additionally,this planned building on the corner of 900 South 800 West is a two-story building, making it fit in more seamlessly with the 900 South neighborhood. ro NJ ..f yJy� I��1 4, R-MU (10155) :. RMF-35 R-M U (1075 S) RMF-35 • The proposed zoning amendment would create a version of the example above; however,the 900 South 800 West lot's building would be more appropriately sized to blend in with the existing single-family homes. • The recommended zoning for 900 South 800 West would layout similarly to other nearby non-car, pedestrian corridors (example above). 77 'Mop R-MU i r I R-MU M-1/TBD ``��►► - _ M-1/TBD NN i111111111tl11U1111�OLR J VAi�Rnh\��� Additional Impact All vacant land on the 900 South (700-800 West) block face is owned by two parties. One party rezoned all their vacant land to R-MU in 2020. The other party wishes to now do the same. What wasn't changed to R-MU is still M-1 which was setup years ago before most manufacturing moved west. While there are several uses for a vacant lot in the current M-1 zone that may be potentially profitable,these don't seem appropriate for the space. These include: a recycling collection station, a gas station, a cannabis production establishment,tire distribution center, sign painting&fabrication, 24-hour taxicab service or a dead animal cremation service center. With 50%+of the 900 South block face (700-800 West) being rezoned to R-MU,the city's intent to bring more mixed residential use along the 9 Line corridor is clear and consistent with the city's long-term planning documents. While the M-1 zone allows for a hotel/motel to be built,the zoning needs to be changed for a more appropriate small, multi-family home to be allowed. It may be helpful for some to compare M-1 and R-MU zoning setbacks. As I understand them,they are as follows: M-1 has no setback requirements for the interior side yard or the rear yard. R-MU has no setback requirements for the interior side yard or the front/corner side yard. M-1 has a 15'front&corner side yard setback M-1 has no open space requirement for a lot nor does it require any rear yards. R-MU requires 20%+open space and a rear yard that is 25%of lot depth, but not exceeding 30'. In the end, changing 900 South 800 West's vacant land zoning to match all other vacant land zoning on the block face is appropriate. Additionally, R-MU zoning incorporates a 20%open space requirement (currently zero open space is required in the M-1 zone) and is the best zoning for helping incorporate off-street parking into the future design. Such zoning seems appropriate since it also requires more parking than the Form zone approved a couple blocks east which requires zero off street parking. R-MU zoning for the last vacant lot on the block face is an infill decision supported by seven SLC long-term planning documents and is in harmony with SLC's vision of sound planning. v�-oos N � -W i• 1 Z77�� �P r > a+ iom y _ Proposed Site Plan: Building (blue) Parking (gray) Open space inside the lot lines exceeds 20% min (light green) Additional open space outside the lot lines (dark green) `�i _ I, ,s r r • h t>� 1 fJ �� r+ - Proposed Building Q Owner's Green Space Proposed Parking SLCs Owner Maintained Green Space The Owner's Proven Commitment To The Community The owner of the property believes in the restoration and enhancement of this community along 800 West. Beginning in 2017 (SLC Case#PLNZAD2017-00393),the owner started with a vacant, neglected lot (830 South 800 West). The owner and his wife designed a custom home with a goal of building a home to add a pocket of sunshine to the area. The home's front door& much of the landscape is designed to be the color of sunshine with the goal of literally adding more sunshine to the neighborhood. Additionally,they sought to bring vintage features into a home that was designed to feel like a restored 1920's home. This included a wood-based exterior over 100%of the home,vintage exterior lighting as well as wood floors and tile that were consistent with buildings from the early 1900's. Lastly, it was landscaped to beautify the neighborhood and was referred to by one neighbor as the street's "Garden of Eden." Despite some individuals experiencing homelessness unplugging the water system to charge their cell phones, it still looks presentable and will be worked on again in 2022. Between this home and a second home (similarly built on a vacant, neglected lot at 802 West Fayette Avenue), nearly 150 trees, shrubs, bushes, grasses and flowers were installed by the hands of the owner. Besides building homes complimenting the character of the neighborhood,the owner has helped and supported other owners along 800 West prepare to improve their land. He began years ago supporting one owner of a vacant parcel at 1050 South 800 West purchase the dilapidated home (808 W. Dalton)that had become a safety issue next door. He supported the owner who then completed a lot line adjustment and he helped sell the lots to individuals who completed the teardown and are beginning the development of 808 W. Dalton.The owner noticed the neglected lots of 800 South 800 West, but when he called to begin the process to clean up that lot(805 South 800 West), it was already in-process to be cleaned up and developed. The lots on the corner of 900 South and 800 West were the last of the neglected lots on 800 West to be cleaned up. The owner and his family have begun cleaning them of trash and weeding them. Rezoning these lots is the first step towards designing a custom home that is suited to the lot, neighborhood and community. The owner has previously worked as a Research Scientist designing product, packaging, and shelf space layouts prior to taking an interest in designing custom living spaces and landscapes to enhance the quality of life. For this corner, designs are being reviewed that originate in northern Europe, Hong Kong, New York and the Salt Lake Valley with the hope of bringing design elements that compliment the neighborhood and restore beauty to a vacant, neglected corner lot. The owner is studying the use of efficient building materials and practices that would enhance life for residents and the community. Upon rezoning,the owner will engage the professional services of additional designers, architects, engineers and builders. The owner believes he can add to our community by providing a quality home in which to live. He's currently renting to or has rented to a diverse set of people living and working right in our community including retired veterans, a member of Ballet West, a volunteer of public radio, nurses,janitors, an airline analyst, self-employed service contractors, house cleaners, and partially-disabled individuals. This zoning change allows for something to be built that will include ground-level units that may also afford some the rare chance to age in place near family. Additionally,this rezoning will offer a housing option that is disappearing since many multi-story apartment buildings are now including either parking on the first floor or commercial retail space. Thank you for time and for the opportunity to work together to bring something good to our community. Sincerely, Cameron Broadbent 4. MAILING LIST NAME ADDRESS UNIT CITY STATE ZIP CODE MARIO ARTURO BALTAZAR SANCHEZ 817 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SHAUN L SIMPSON;CAROL SIMPSON(JT) 813 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ANDREW W COLE 2171 W 1970 NORTH CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 ROSENDO ZAVALA 801 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOSE SAMUEL GRACIA;REYNA GLORIA GRACIA(JT) 854 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PATRICIO J BLANDON 866 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ADRIENNE M AMES 822 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GORDON R SOLT 816 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ANNALISA E ESQUIBEL;ALESANDRE GONZALES(TC) 810 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHASE SOVEREEN 872 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ALAN STEVEN CURTIS 1947 E STAG HILL CIR DRAPER UT 84020 MONTAGUE APTS LLC 10896 S 1000 E SANDY UT 84094 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 NICOLE DANIELLE CURTIS 853 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MICHAEL J HOPPER;HERMELINDA G HOPPER(JT) 865 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AMANDA CLARE FERNANDEZ;JIMMY FERNANDEZ 869 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 COLLEEN MAREE FECHNER 871 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CAMERON BROADBENT 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 ARLINE STONE;TRACY BUTTERFIELD;JACOB BUTTERFIELD;IRENE MARTIN; 763 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 THOMAS S SATTERFIELD;LESLIE SATTERFIELD(JT) 2251 E ALVA CIR MILLCREEK UT 84109 3148 LLC 51 E 400 S SUITE 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LINNUS WEGE 751 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ROSA M VEGA 756 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JESUS CHACON;RAQUEL CHAVEZ(JT) 750 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 PETER R VIOLETTE;ALANA C VIOLETTE(JT) 1576 ELVADO DRWAY#6 SIMI VALLEY CA 93065 J&B PROPERTIES UTAH 2 LLC 729 S KILBY CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LINDA M BEDDICK 8S1 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LAWRENCE H IV FRAMME 847 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 VANESSA CHARCAS;JOSEPH C GORMAN(JT) 767 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 855 S,A SERIES OF NORTHCREST HOLDINGS,LLC 3923 S 500 E MILLCREEK UT 84107 857 S,A SERIES OF NORTHCREST HOLDINGS,LLC 3923 S 500 E MILLCREEK UT 84107 WEST END LLC 176 N 2200 W#200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 205 HUDSON ST NEW YORK NY 10013 UTAH PAPER BOX COMPANY 920 S 700 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SAN PEDRO,L A&S L RAILROAD CO 1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640 OMAHA NE 68179 Current Occupant 809 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 924 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 810 W MONTAGUE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 802 W MONTAGUE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 855 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 875 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 792 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 757 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 755 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 748 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 746 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 766 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 765 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 855 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 857 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 739 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 742 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 740 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 744 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 755 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 959 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 915 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 733 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Item El tells MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY2g _t77: TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget&Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023 RE: Interlocal Agreement for 2023 Municipal General Election Services MOTION i—ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution for an election services interlocal cooperation agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for the 2023 municipal general election. Staff note: This year, the municipal elections are being held for Council Districts Two,Four,Six,and the mayoral race. There is no primary. The Council selected ranked choice voting as the election method. MOTION 2—NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor fy� L9i CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 04/12/2023 Lis (Apr 12,202314:26 MDT) Date Sent to Council: 04/12/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 4/12/2023 Darin Mano, Council Chair FROM: Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder SUBJECT: Elections STAFF CONTACTS: Olivia Hoge,Election Management Coordinator, olivia.hoge@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Resolution to approve the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement BUDGET IMPACT: $244,551 Estimated Rank Choice Voting Method, FY 22-23: $35,000, FY 23-24: $40,000 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:The greatest estimated cost for Salt Lake City to participate in Ranked Choice Voting will be $244,551,which can decrease depending on how many municipalities are participating in Ranked Choice Voting and how many races will require Rank Choice Voting (this is dependent upon how many candidates declare in August.) This cost is still lower than the estimated cost of using the Traditional Voting Method, estimated at$320,608. In 2021, the final cost for Salt Lake City's Municipal Election using Ranked Choice voting was $121,948, which was $35,572 more than the initial estimate of$86,376. To stay true to their estimate, Salt Lake County only charged$86,376 for the total cost of the election. The 2023 proposed agreement defines that Salt Lake City will be responsible for any additional charges and that those will be invoiced to the City after the election if the election exceeds the estimated cost from the County. Refer to Attachment A for the Interlocal Agreement with Salt Lake County. The costs associated will be included in the Attorney's Department budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.Attachment B is the Resolution for the approval of the Interlocal Agreement. It has been confirmed there will be no state funding available for awareness of Ranked Choice Voting this election.Any awareness materials must be funded by the City. For fiscal year 22-23, the Recorder's office is requesting$35,000 to cover awareness materials and an additional$40,000 in the FY 23-24 proposal provided the expenses will the incurred between @y and October. The request for funding for FY 22-23 is forthcoming in a budget amendment. ATTACHMENT A County Contract No. CK23116 City Contract No. D.A. No. 23CIV000146 INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION and SALT LAKE COUNTY on behalf of the COUNTY CLERK'S ELECTION'S DIVISION FOR MUNICIPAL ELECTION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into the _ day of 2023, by and between SALT LAKE COUNTY (the "County"), a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah, on behalf of the Salt Lake County Clerk's Office, Elections Division; and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION (the "City") a municipal corporation created under the laws of the State of Utah. RECI TALS: WHEREAS, the County desires to provide the services of its clerk's office, elections division, to the City for the purpose of assisting the City in conducting the City's 2023 general municipal election; WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the County for such services; and WHEREAS, the parties are public agencies and are therefore authorized by the Utah Interlocal Cooperation Act, UTAH CODE §§ 11-13-101 to -608 (2022), to enter into agreements to cooperate with each other in a manner which will enable them to make the most efficient use of their resources and powers. AG REEM ENT: NOW THEREFORE, in exchange for valuable consideration, including the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1 1. Term. The County shall provide election services described below to the City commencing on the date this Agreement is approved by both parties and terminating on December 31 , 2023. Either party may cancel this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Upon such cancellation, each party shall retain ownership of any property it owned prior to the date of this Agreement, and the City shall own any property it created or acquired pursuant to this Agreement. 2. Scope of Work. The services to be provided by the County shall be as set forth in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit "A." Generally, the County shall perform the listed election functions as set forth in Exhibit "A" and as needed to ensure implementation of the City's 2023 general municipal election. 3. Legal Requirements. a. The County and the City understand and agree that the City's 2023 general municipal election is the City's election. The City shall be responsible for compliance with all legal requirements for that election. The City agrees to translate ballot issues, if any, into Spanish. The County will provide the remaining Spanish translations for the ballot and other election materials as required by law. The County agrees to work with the City in complying with all legal requirements for the conduct of that election and conduct that election pursuant to the direction of the City, including any recounts requested by the City under Utah Code Section 20A-4-603, except as provided in this Agreement and Exhibit "A." The County agrees to disclose and maintain election results through its website merely as a courtesy and convenience to the City. The City, and not the County, is responsible to resolve any and all election questions, problems, and legal issues that are within the City's statutory authority. 2 b. The County and the City understand and agree that if the County provides services or resources to conduct an instant runoff voting election as described in sections 20A-4-603 and -604, UTAH CODE (2022) ("Rank Choice Voting"), the estimated cost of administering such an election will be provided to the City at a later time. C. If the City decides to hold a Rank Choice Voting election, then, in accordance with Utah Code § 20A-4-602(3)(a), it shall provide the Lt. Governor and the County notice of its intent to use Rank Choice Voting as its selected method of voting, no later than May 1, 2023. d. The County has the full ability to conduct Rank Choice Voting for races involving no more than 10 candidates. The City therefore acknowledges that if the County conducts a Rank Choice Voting race involving more than 10 candidates, then the County will be able to count only the first ten valid preference rankings cast by each voter in that race. The City hereby assumes full risk and liability for, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the County, its agents, officers and employees from and against, any and all actions, claims, lawsuits, contests, controversies, challenges, proceedings, liability, damages, losses and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs) arising out of or resulting from the City's decision to use of Rank Choice Voting in a race involving more than 10 candidates. Moreover, the County reserves the right to refuse to conduct a City election, or any contest, that includes a Rank Choice Voting race involving more than 10 candidates. The County's exercise of such a right shall be effective immediately upon written notice to the City and shall not be construed as a breach 3 of, or an event of default under, this Agreement, and said exercise shall be without any liability of, or penalty to, the County. 4. Cost. In consideration of the services performed under this Agreement, the City shall pay the County. The estimated cost of such services shall be provided in Exhibit "B," and will be attached hereto and incorporated by reference. The County shall provide a written invoice to the City at the conclusion of the elections, and the City shall pay the County within thirty days of receiving the invoice. The invoice shall contain a summary of the costs of the election and shall provide the formula for allocating the costs among the issues and jurisdictions participating in the elections. In the case of a vote recount, election system audit, election contest, or similar event arising out of the City's election, the City shall pay the County's actual costs of responding to such events, based on a written invoice provided by the County. The invoice amount for these additional services may cause the total cost to the City to exceed the estimate given to the City by the County. For such consideration, the County shall furnish all materials, labor and equipment to complete the requirements and conditions of this Agreement. 5. Governmental Immunity. The City and the County are governmental entities and subject to the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101 to — 904 (2022) (the "Governmental Immunity Act"). Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any rights, statutory limitations on liability, or defenses applicable to the City or the County under the Governmental Immunity Act or common law. Each party shall retain liability and responsibility for the acts and omissions of their representative officers. In no event shall this Agreement be construed to establish a partnership, joint venture or other similar relationship between the parties and nothing contained herein shall authorize either party to act as an agent for the other. Each of the parties hereto 4 assumes full responsibility for the negligent operations, acts and omissions of its own employees, agents and contractors. It is not the intent of the parties to incur by Agreement any liability for the negligent operations, acts, or omissions of the other party or its agents, employees, or contractors. 6. No Obligations to Third Parties. The parties agree that the County's obligations under this Agreement are solely to the City. This Agreement shall not confer any rights to third parties. 7. Indemnification. Subject to the provisions of the Act, the City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the County, its agents, officers and employees from and against any and all actions, claims, lawsuits, proceedings, liability, damages, losses and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs), arising out of or resulting from the performance of this Agreement to the extent the same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of the City, its officers, agents and employees and including but not limited to claims that the County violated any state or federal law in the provision of election services under this Agreement. 8. Election Records. The City shall maintain and keep control of all of its records created pursuant to this Agreement and from the elections relevant to this Agreement. The City shall respond to all public record requests related to this Agreement and the underlying elections and shall retain its election records consistent with the Government Records Access and Management Act, UTAH CODE §§ 63G-2-101 to -901 (2022), and all other relevant local, state and federal laws. 9. Service Cancellation. If the Agreement is canceled or terminated as provided above, the City shall pay the County on the basis of the actual services performed according to the terms of this Agreement. Upon cancellation or termination of 5 this Agreement by either party, the County shall submit to the City an itemized statement for services rendered under this Agreement up to the time of said cancellation or termination and based upon the dollar amounts for materials, equipment and services set forth herein. 10. Legal Compliance. The County, as part of the consideration herein, shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws governing elections. The City agrees that the direction it gives the County under Utah Code § 20A-5-400.1(2)(a) and this Agreement shall likewise be in strict compliance with all such applicable laws. The County shall be under no obligation to comply with any direction from the City that is not demonstrably consistent with all applicable federal, state and county laws governing elections. 11. Agency. No agent, employee or servant of the City or the County is or shall be deemed to be an employee, agent or servant of the other party. None of the benefits provided by either party to its employees including, but not limited to, workers' compensation insurance, health insurance and unemployment insurance, are available to the employees, agents, or servants of the other party. The City and the County shall each be solely and entirely responsible for its own acts and for the acts of its own agents, employees and servants during the performance of this Agreement. 12. Force Majeure. Neither party shall be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform arises from causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of that party, e.g., acts of God, fires, floods, strikes or unusually severe weather. If such condition continues for a period in excess of 60 days, the City or the County shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability or penalty effective upon written notice to the other party. 6 13. Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed sufficient if given by a written communication and shall be deemed to have been received upon personal delivery, actual receipt, or within three (3) days after such notice is deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and certified and addressed to the parties as set forth below: Salt Lake County Salt Lake County Mayor 2001 South State Street, N2-100 Salt Lake City, Utah 84190 and Ann Stoddard Admin/Fiscal Manager Salt Lake County Clerk's Office 2001 South State, Suite S1-200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84190-1050 email: astoddard@slco.org City email: 14. Required Insurance Policies. Both parties to this Agreement shall maintain insurance or self-insurance coverage sufficient to meet their obligations hereunder and consistent with applicable law. 15. Independent Contractor. Because the County is consolidating election functions in order to conduct multiple, simultaneous elections on August 15, 2023, and on November 7, 2023, certain decisions by the County referenced in Exhibit "A" may not be subject to review by the City. It is therefore understood by the parties that the County will act as an independent contractor with regard to its decisions regarding resources, 7 procedures and policies based upon providing a consistent type, scope and level of service to all participating jurisdictions made for the benefit of the whole as set forth in Exhibit "A." 16. No Officer or Employee Interest. It is understood and agreed that no officer or employee of the County has or shall have any pecuniary interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds resulting from the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of the City or any member of their families shall serve on any County board or committee or hold any such County position which either by rule, practice or action nominates, recommends or supervises the City's operations or authorizes funding or payments to the City. 17. Ethical Standards. The City represents that it has not: (a) provided an illegal gift to any County officer or employee, or former County officer or employee, or to any relative or business entity of a County officer or employee, or relative or business entity of a former County officer or employee; (b) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees of bona fide commercial agencies established for the purpose of securing business; (c) breached any of the ethical standards set forth in Utah Code Title 10, Chapter 3, Part 13 or section 2.07, Salt Lake County Code of Ordinances; or (d) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, any County officer or employee or former County officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in Utah Code Title 10, Chapter 3, Part 13 or Salt Lake County ordinance section 2.07. 8 18. Interlocal Agreement. In satisfaction of the requirements of the Utah Interlocal Cooperation Act, UTAH CODE §§ 11-13-101 to -608 (2022), (the "Interlocal Act"), in connection with this Agreement, the City and the County agree as follows: a. This Agreement shall be approved by each party, pursuant to section 11-13-202.5 of the Interlocal Act; b. This Agreement shall be reviewed as to proper form and compliance with applicable law by a duly authorized attorney on behalf of each party, pursuant to Section 11-13-202.5 of the Interlocal Act; C. Any duly executed original counterpart of the Agreement shall be filed with the keeper of records of each party, pursuant to section 11-13-209 of the Interlocal Act; d. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, each party shall be responsible for its own costs of any action performed pursuant to this Agreement, and for any financing of such costs; and e. No separate legal entity is created by the terms of this Agreement. No real or personal property shall be acquired jointly by the parties as a result of this Agreement. To the extent that a party acquires, holds or disposes of any real or personal property for use in the joint or cooperative undertaking contemplated by this Agreement, such party shall do so in the same manner that it deals with other property of such party. To the extent that this Agreement requires administration other than as set forth herein, it will be administered by a joint board of the County Clerk and the City Recorder, or their designees. The board members shall perform their respective duties described in this Agreement. The County Clerk shall be responsible for the basic operational functions involved in 9 conducting the City's election and shall bring to the City Recorder's attention any election questions, problems, or legal issues regarding the election and otherwise consult with the City Recorder about significant matters or decisions related to the election. In the event of a disagreement between the City Recorder and the County Clerk regarding those matters, the County Clerk will have authority to make the final decision. f. County and City Representatives. i. The County designates the County Clerk as the County's representative to assist in the administrative management of this Agreement and to coordinate performance of the services under this Agreement. ii. The City has designated the City's City Recorder as the City's representative in its performance of this Agreement. The City's Representative is responsible for working with the County to coordinate the performance of the City's obligations under this Agreement. g. Either party may withdraw from the joint or cooperative undertaking described in this Agreement only upon the termination of this Agreement. h. Voting by the respective County Clerk and City Recorder will be based on one vote per party, subject to the County Clerk having final decision- making authority as described in section 18(e). i. The functions to be performed by the joint board or cooperative undertaking are those described in this Agreement. j. The powers of the joint board are those described in this Agreement. 10 19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the City and the County. 20. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Utah both as to interpretation and performance. All actions including but not limited to court proceedings, administrative proceedings, arbitration and mediation proceedings, shall be commenced, maintained, adjudicated and resolved within Salt Lake County. 21. Integration. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement and shall not be altered except in writing signed by both parties. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. SALT LAKE COUNTY: Mayor or Designee Date: Recommended for Approval: Lannie Chapman Salt Lake County Clerk Reviewed as to Form: Deputy District Attorney Date- SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION: By: Name: Title: Date: Approved as to Proper Form and Compliance with Applicable Law- By: Boyd Ferguson, Senior City Attorney Date: April 11, 2023 12 Election Interlocal Agreement 2023_v5 Final Audit Report 2023-04-11 Created: 2023-04-11 By: Olivia Hoge(olivia.hoge@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAObZn1jLjOk38mSmgg8_hQXwlOmlb-RtA "Election Interlocal Agreement 2023_v5" History Document created by Olivia Hoge (olivia.hoge@slcgov.com) 2023-04-11 -6:11:39 PM GMT Cy Document emailed to Boyd Ferguson (boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com)for signature 2023-04-11 -6:12:03 PM GMT Email viewed by Boyd Ferguson (boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com) 2023-04-11 -7:06:25 PM GMT tt Document e-signed by Boyd Ferguson (boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2023-04-11 -7:07:33 PM GMT-Time Source:server 19 Agreement completed. 2023-04-11 -7:07:33 PM GMT Names and email addresses are entered into the Acrobat Sign service by Acrobat Sign users and are unverified unless otherwise noted. Powered by r Adobe Y' Acrobat Sign Exhibit "A" 2023 Local District Election Scope of Work The Local District agrees to the consolidation of all election administrative functions to ensure the successful conduct of multiple, simultaneous municipal and local district elections and the County agrees to conduct a vote by mail/consolidated polls election for the Local District in accordance with the municipal election. In a consolidated election, decisions made by the County regarding resources, procedures and policies are based upon providing the same scope and level of service to all the participating jurisdictions and the Local District recognizes that such decisions, made for the benefit of the whole, may not be subject to review by the Local District. Services the County will perform for the Local District include, but are not limited to: • Ballot layout and design • Ballot ordering and printing • Machine programming and testing • Delivery of supplies and equipment • Provision of all supplies • Election vote center/early vote locations • Vote by Mail administration • Updating state and county websites • Tabulating, reporting, auditing and preparing canvassing election results • Conducting recounts as needed • All notices and mailings required by law (except those required by Utah Code Ann. Ch. 11-14, Part 2 and § 20A-9-203) • Direct payment of all costs associated with the election to include vote center workers, training, polling places, and rovers. The Local District will provide the County Clerk with information, decisions, and resolutions and will take appropriate actions required for the conduct of the election in a timely manner. The County will provide a good faith estimate for budgeting purposes (Exhibit "B"). Election costs are variable and are based upon the offices scheduled for election, the number of voters, the number of jurisdictions participating as well as any direct costs incurred. The Local District will be invoiced for its pro-rata share of the actual costs of the election which will not exceed the estimate in Exhibit B. In the event of a state or county special election being held in conjunction with a municipal or local district election, the scope of services and associated costs, and the method of calculating those costs, will remain unchanged. Exhibit "B" 2023 Election Costs Salt Lake City Below is the good faith estimate for the upcoming 2023 Municipal Election for Salt Lake City. Assumptions for providing this estimate consist of the following: A. Active voters (as of 1/27/2023): 97,286 B. Election for the offices below: 2023 Offices All billing will be based on actual costs. Mayor Council District 2 Council District 4 Council District 6 If your municipality pursues traditional voting, not ranked choice voting (RCV), and has a Primary Election and a General Election, the estimated cost would be $319,906. If your municipality chooses RCV for the General Election and cancels the Primary Election, the estimated cost would be $207,939 for the General Election plus RCV costs (see below). If your municipality chooses RCV for the Primary Election and holds a traditional voting General Election, the estimated cost would be $319,906 plus the RCV costs (see below). RCV Costs will be applied on a sliding scale, see below. If your municipality chooses to hold a RCV election for either the Primary or the General, the added costs will be dependent upon how many other municipalities opt into RCV. As an example, if Salt Lake City is the only municipality to hold a RCV election, the costs would be as quoted above plus $36,156. You can see if two municipalities choose RCV, your added costs would be $18,078. (See the chart below for the additional cost depending on how many municipalities participate.) Number of Number of participating Allocated participating Allocated municipalities costs municipal ties costs 1 S 36,156 13 S 2,781 2 S 18,078 14 S 2,583 3 S 12052 15 S 2410 4 S 9,039 16 S 2,260 5 S 7,231 17 S 2,127 6 S 6,026 18 S 2,009 7 S 5,165 19 S 1,903 8 S 4,520 20 S 1,808 9 S 4,017 21 S 1,722 10 S 3,616 22 S 1,643 11 S 3,287 23 S 1,572 12 S 3,013 ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION OF 2023 Authorizing approval of an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Salt Lake County regarding the County provided Election Assistance Services for the City. WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code allows public entities to enter into cooperative agreement to provide joint undertakings and services; and WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah as follows: 1. It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of the following: AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND SALT LAKE COUNTY, ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY CLERK ELECTION DIVISION, EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE IT IS SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, REGARDING THE COUNTY PROVIDING ELECTION ASSISTANCE SERVICES TO THE CITY. 2. Erin Mendenhall Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah or her designee is hereby authorized to approve, execute, and deliver said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, in substantially the same form as now before the City Council and attached hereto, subject to such minor changes that do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City there under and as shall be approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. PASSED by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day of , 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM: Salt Lake City Attorney's Office 2023 Resolution Approving InterlocalAgmt Final Audit Report 2023-04-11 Created: 2023-04-11 By: Olivia Hoge(olivia.hoge@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAADOUJILskN_k1NDvwVjPdNRyhvtDLusvd "2023 Resolution Approving InterlocalAgmt" History Document created by Olivia Hoge (olivia.hoge@slcgov.com) 2023-04-11 -10:25:09 PM GMT Cy Document emailed to Boyd Ferguson (boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com)for signature 2023-04-11 -10:25:23 PM GMT Email viewed by Boyd Ferguson (boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com) 2023-04-11 -10:26:29 PM GMT tt Document e-signed by Boyd Ferguson (boyd.ferguson@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2023-04-11 -10:27:35 PM GMT-Time Source:server 19 Agreement completed. 2023-04-11 -10:27:35 PM GMT Names and email addresses are entered into the Acrobat Sign service by Acrobat Sign users and are unverified unless otherwise noted. Dowered by Adobe Y' Acrobat Sign RESOLUTION : Interlocal Memorandum - 2023 Election Services Final Audit Report 2023-04-11 Created: 2023-04-11 By: Cindy Trishman(cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAIG28eaDdiPPg3kEFfks9zoBcPM8fmo7L "RESOLUTION: Interlocal Memorandum - 2023 Election Service s" History Document created by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) 2023-04-11 -10:35:33 PM GMT Document e-signed by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com) Signature Date:2023-04-11 -10:37:50 PM GMT-Time Source:server Q Agreement completed. 2023-04-11 -10:37:50 PM GMT Names and email addresses are entered into the Acrobat Sign service by Acrobat Sign users and are unverified unless otherwise noted. Powered by Adobe Acrobat Sign Item E2 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023 RE: Naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the Senator Garn Greeting Room MOTION i(adopt) I move that the Council adopt the resolution. MOTION 2 (reject) I move that the Council reject the resolution. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayor ♦,alp T.w°'' CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL z G , Date Received: 4/4/2023 Rac gel Otto,Chief of taff Date Sent to Council: 4/4/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 4/4/2023 Darin Mano,Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the Senator Garn Greeting Room STAFF CONTACT: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Bill Wyatt,Department of Airports Director DOCUMENT TYPE: Informational item RECOMMENDATION: Notify Council of the proposed room naming per City Code Chapter 3.65 BUDGET IMPACT: New signage is estimated to be approximately$500.00. The Department of Airports proposes to cover this expense through current budget allocations. BACKGROUND: Mayor Mendenhall proposes naming the Salt Lake International Airport Greeting Room the "Senator Garn Greeting Room"after former Salt Lake City Mayor and Utah Senator Jake Garn. Naming city assets is addressed in City Code Chapter 3.65.Section 3.65.020 states that the naming of major assets requires City Council approval,while the naming of minor assets requires only the Mayor's approval.A major asset includes a structure or facility,including a portion of structure or facility.Under City Code,the Salt Lake International Greeting Room is a major asset.The Council may choose to approve the name change through legislative process or defer the approval to the Mayor's Office. Chapter 3.65 allows the Council 15 business days after receipt of this notice to determine whether it wishes to use a legislative process for the naming of the Salt Lake City Airport Greeting Room. If,at the conclusion of those 15 business days,the Council has not responded to this notice, the P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 naming decision and process reverts to the Mayor's Office to use the minor asset approval process. Jake Garn was elected Salt Lake City Commissioner in 1967 and Mayor in 1971. He went on the serve three terms as a United States Senator from 1974-1992. Some highlights of Sen. Garn's accomplishments for Salt Lake City,the state of Utah,and the country include: • Serving as a pilot for U.S.Navy and the Utah Air National Guard,retiring as a Colonel in 1979; • Becoming Utah's first astronaut and the first sitting member of Congress to travel to space when he flew in the space shuttle Discovery; • Authoring Utah's first Wilderness Area,Lone Peak Wilderness,in 1978,which protects 30,632 acres of National Forest Land and Salt Lake City watershed; • Working with Salt Lake City Mayor Ted Wilson to complete the Trust for Public Lands Exchange. This land exchange prevented housing encroachment at the mouth of Little Cottonwood Canyon. The Exchange also facilitated the Snow Basin development of a downhill racing run in time for the 2002 Winter Olympics. • Working with the Bureau of Reclamation to site the Jordanelle Dam and Reservoir northeast of Heber City in Wasatch and Summit Counties and obtaining all the appropriations over 10 years for the construction of the reservoir and relocation of the highways; • Authoring the 1992 Central Utah Project Completion Act,which finished Utah's acquisition of its 23 percent of the Upper Colorado River Basin allotment as granted under the1922 Colorado River Accords;and • Placing TRAX funding in the 1992 Transportation Appropriations bill to begin construction of the TRAX Wasatch Front High Speed Rail Project. RESOLUTION NO._OF 2023 (A Resolution in Support and Approval of Naming the "Senator Garn Greeting Room" at the Salt Lake City International Airport) WHEREAS, the Mayor notified the Salt Lake City Council of a proposal to name a major City asset, the greeting room at the Salt Lake City International Airport ("Airport"), after Senator Garn as the "Senator Garn Greeting Room"; and WHEREAS, Senator Garn has a long history of involvement in aeronautics as Utah's first astronaut and sitting member of Congress to travel into space; and WHEREAS, Senator Garn formerly made significant contributions to Salt lake City and Utah by, among other things, authoring Utah's first Wilderness are, which protects 30,632 acres of National Forest Land and Salt Lake City watershed; served as mayor of Salt Lake City; worked with Salt Lake City Mayor Ted Wilson to complete the Trust for Public Lands Exchange,preventing housing encroachment at the mouth of Little Cottonwood Canyon and facilitating the Snow Basin development of a downhill racing run in time for the 2002 Winter Olympics; and WHEREAS, Senator Garn worked with the Bureau of Reclamation to site the Jordanelle Dam and Reservoir and obtained appropriations for over a decade for the construction of the reservoir and relocation of highways; authored the 1992 Central Utah Project Completion Act, which finished Utah's acquisition of its 23 percent of the Upper Colorado River Basin allotment as granted under the1922 Colorado River Accords; and facilitated the funding in the 1992 Transportation Appropriations bill to begin construction of the TRAX Wasatch Front High Speed Rail Project; and WHEREAS, Unless City Council declines to act after written notice of the proposed naming of a major City asset, Salt Lake City Code specifies that City Council must approve the naming of all "major City assets"; WHEREAS, a"major city asset"under Salt Lake City Code 3.65 includes portions of municipal buildings such as the greeting room at the Airport; and WHEREAS, the proposed name aligns with the naming standards set forth under City Code 3.65; and WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed the naming proposal and desires to express its support and approval of naming the greeting room at the Airport as the "Senator Garn Greeting Room." THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. Having reviewed the naming proposal for the greeting room at the Salt Lake City International Airport, and for the reasons expressed herein, hereby expresses support and approval for naming the greeting room as the "Senator Garn Greeting Room." Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: Darin Mano, Chair, Salt Lake City Council Attest: City Recorder Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Approved as to Form: Senior City Attorney 2 Item E3 •••• ' "'z MOTION SHEET _ CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY ivy ii� •_'t°'.-• ii � I�'� iip TO: City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno,Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023 RE: Resolution: Local Emergency Declaration Extension— Flooding from Spring Runoff Motion 1 - I move the Council approves the extension of Proclamation 1 of 2023 from the date of this Resolution until June 30, 2023, unless later extended or terminated by subsequent resolution of the Council or unless terminated pursuant to State law. Motion 2 - I move that the Council reject the resolution. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 RESOLUTION NO. OF 2023 Extension of Declaration of Local Emergency: Flood WHEREAS, under Utah Code 53-2a-208, the chief executive of a municipality may declare a local emergency, which local emergency may remain in effect for up to 30 days. WHEREAS,under Utah Code 53-2a-208(6), any extension of the local emergency beyond the initial 30 days must be with the consent of the governing body of the municipality. WHEREAS, on April 12, 2023, Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall issued a Declaration of Local Emergency and Exercise of Emergency Powers No. 1 of 2023 in response to flooding caused by rapid snowmelt and warm weather("Proclamation 1 of 2023"). WHEREAS, based on the continued existence of a large snowpack in the mountains upstream from Salt Lake City and fluctuating weather temperatures, there is an elevated risk of flood-caused damage during the spring snowmelt season. As such, the City Council has determined that extending the duration of the local emergency is in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of Salt Lake City's residents. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,the following: 1. The Council approves the extension of Proclamation 1 of 2023 from the date of this Resolution until , 2023, unless later extended or terminated by subsequent resolution of the Council or unless terminated pursuant to State law. 2. Prior to the issuance of any proclamation exercising emergency powers under Proclamation 1 of 2023, the Mayor shall provide written notification to the Council of: (a) the specific powers the Mayor intends to exercise; (b) the justification for exercising such powers in connection with the local emergency; and(c)the anticipated effect of the exercise of such powers, including the anticipated cost or lost revenue to the City. 3. At any Council meeting while the local emergency is still in effect,the Council may seek additional information from the Mayor, including the actual effect of the exercise of any emergency powers and the actual costs or lost revenue to the City due to such exercise of powers. 4. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon passage. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah this day of May, 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Darin Mano, Chair ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: Approved as to form: Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Kat ,.-Lewis Ap,2,202321:52 MOT) Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder Katherine Lewis, City Attorney Item F1 p MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY - cI f°y._rn.�e_rt TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget&Policy Analyst DATE: May 2, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET—Resolution adopting Salt Lake City and Library Fund tentative budgets for FY 2023-24- MOTION i—ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the tentative budget for Salt Lake City,Utah,including the tentative budget of the Library Fund,for Fiscal Year 2023-24. MOTION 2 —NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 AD RESOLUTION NO. 2023 Adopting the tentative budgets of Salt Lake City, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for fiscal year 2023-2024 WHEREAS, the Budget Officer of Salt Lake City Corporation(the "City") has filed tentative budgets, including the tentative budget for the Library Fund, accompanied by a budget message pursuant to Section 10-6-111 of the Utah Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to review, consider and adopt the tentative budgets in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose; and WHEREAS, each tentative budget adopted by the City Council and all supporting schedules and data shall be a public record in the office of the City Recorder, available for public inspection for a period of at least ten days prior to the adoption of the final budgets; and WHEREAS, at the meeting in which the tentative budgets are adopted, the City Council shall establish the time and place of a public hearing to consider the adoption and shall order that notice thereof be published at least seven days prior to the hearing in a public location within the municipality that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the municipality, on the Utah Public Notice Website, and on the home page of the website of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The tentative budgets for fiscal year 2023-2024, including the tentative budget for the Library Fund, filed by the City's Budget Officer with the City Council, are hereby adopted as the City's tentative budgets and are ordered to be filed and maintained as a public record, available for public inspection in the office of the City Recorder, whose permanent office is located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, until adoption of the final budgets. 2. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Approved as to Form Date: CITY RECORDER A"-w Q 1 By: Jaysen Oldroyd ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETII TIIOMPSON Mayor Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCILTRANSMITTAL J j5j„� IZ27)OL1456 MOT) Date Received: 04/27/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 04/27/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council Darin Mano, Chair DATE: April 27, 2023 FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer a SUBJECT: Council Consent Agenda #9 Items Fiscal Year 2022-23 STAFF CONTACTS: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer (801) 535-6403 or Lisa Hunt, Deputy Chief Financial Officer (801) 535-7926 DOCUMENT TYPE: Consent Agenda/Establish Grant Projects from Grant Holding Account RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that the City Council consent to the transfer of these grants and donations from the holding account and establish a project budget for them. BUDGET IMPACT: Grant Holding Account ($ 930,000.00) New Grant Project 930,000.00 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The grant holding account was established to fund grants between budget amendments with the understanding that the grants would be submitted as part of the next budget opening. Items transmitted are placed on a Council Consent agenda and then formally approved during the following budget amendment. On occasion, a similar process is employed for donations to the City. Where necessary, resolutions were previously passed authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept these grants and donations. EXHIBITS: Consent Agenda Detail Consent Agenda Summary DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 245 SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114 TEL 801-535-6403 �ectiojkjjC,oy&cil Consent Agenda - Grant Award G-i: Utah Dept.of Transportation,SLC Traffic Signal Synchronization Misc. Grants $930,000.00 Department:Community&Neighborhoods Prepared By: Kurt Larson/Ann Garcia The Department of Community and Neighborhood,Division of Transportation requested$930,000 for the Salt Lake City Traffic Signal Synchronization.The aim is to minimize the diversion of traffic to local and residential streets by installing radar detection equipment at an estimated 31 key intersections.The radar detection equipment synchronizes traffic signals and helps traffic signals better detect cyclists.The source for the$70,000(Match)cost share is the City's Capital Improvement Program(CIP)Complete Streets. This application was submitted on January 19,2017 for the Fiscal Year 2o18-2023 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program. A public hearing will be held on 5/2/2023. 1 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Consent Agenda#9 Initiative Number/Name Fund Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Ongoing or One-time FrEs Section G: Council Consent Agenda-Grant Awards i 1 Utah Dept.of Transportation,SLC Traffic Signal Synchronization '4ise Gran is 930,000.00 One Time o Section I: Council Added Item Total of Budget Amendment Items 0.00 930,000.00 0 Signature: Alejandro-Sand ez(Apr 27,202313:16 MDT Email: alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 3/23/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/23/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/23/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint John Wilson a member of the Sister Cities Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 23, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for Sister Cities Board. John Wilson to be appointed for a four year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent and term ending on Monday,July 6, 2027. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor cc: file P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 3/23/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/23/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/23/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Ma@n Mortensen a member of the Sister Cities Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 23, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for Sister Cities Board. Matilyn Mortensen to be appointed for a four year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent and term ending on Monday,July 6, 2027. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor cc: file P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 3/23/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/23/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/23/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Ross Chambless a member of the Sister Cities Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 23, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for Sister Cities Board. Ross Chambless to be appointed for a four year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent and term ending on Monday,July 6, 2027. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor cc: file P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 3/23/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/23/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/23/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Sister Cities Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Annie Quan a member of the Sister Cities Board. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj March 23, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for Sister Cities Board. Annie Quan to be appointed for a four year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent and term ending on Monday,July 6, 2027. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall,Mayor cc: file P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 4/19/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 4/19/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 4/19/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Arts Council STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation:Arts Council RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Kathy Davis member of Arts Council. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj April 19, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for Arts Council. Kathy Davis to be re-appointed for a three year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor cc: filc P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 4/19/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 4/19/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 4/19/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Arts Council STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation:Arts Council RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Torle Nenbee member of Arts Council. P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj April 19, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for Arts Council. Torle Nenbee to be re-appointed for a threeyear term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor cc: filc P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 4/19/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 4/19/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 4/19/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Utah Performing Arts Center Agency (UPACA) STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: : Utah Performing Arts Center Agency (UPACA) RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Deirdre (Dee- dee) Darby-Duffin member of: Utah Performing Arts Center Agency (UPACA). P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj April 19, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for: Utah Performing Arts Center Agency(UPACA). Deirdre (Dee-dee) Darby-Duffin to be re-appointed for a four year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor cc: filc P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL C1 Gt,C Date Received: 4/20/2023 Rac el Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 4/20/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 4/20/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Mosquito Abatement Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Re-Appointment Recommendation: Mosquito Abatement Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and re-appoint Neil Vickers member of Mosquito Abatement Board P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 ERIN MENDENHALL OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Mayorv� L9 srn= =Arj April 20, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for: Mosquito Abatement Board. Neil Vickers to be re-appointed for a four year term, starting from date of City Council advice and consent and term ending on December 31, 2027. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor cc: file P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841 14-5474 TEL 801-535-7704 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 The Local Building Authority,the Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 in an Electronic Meeting, pursuant to the Redevelopment Agency and City Council Chairs'determination. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katie Lewis —City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman— City Recorder, Ben Luedtke—Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer—Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Robert Nutzman— Administrative Assistant,Taylor Hill— Council Office Council Member Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Council/Board Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings. Minutes: Council Member Fowler welcomed everyone in attendance to the meeting. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: A moment of silence was held while the American Flag and Pledge text was displayed on the screen. 3• Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Councilmember Fowler reviewed the rules of decorum. B. LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno clarified that the Local Building Authority budget was related to the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries as Capital Projects by the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2021-22. 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Deborah Chaltron spoke to the need to keep the tennis courts at Liberty Park; it kept her connected to her community and requested support for the funding for the tennis facilities. Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to close this public hearing and refer to the public hearing on June 1, 2021. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass C. LBA NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution: Electronic Meetings The Board will consider adopting a resolution which permits the Local Building Authority Board of Directors to meet electronically pursuant to the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 2 of 2021,which permits the Local Building Authority Board of Directors to meet electronically pursuant to the Utah Open Public Meetings Act AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass D. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn and reconvene as the Redevelopment Agency Board. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. E. RDA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2o21-22 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno presented the Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22. George Chapman spoke to the Redevelopment Agency and the implementation of their goals,the need for funding for parks and affordable housing, smaller sidewalks should not be allowed in the City. Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan, seconded by Board Member Valdemoros to close the public hearing and refer to the public hearing on June 1, 2o2i AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass F. RDA ADJOURNMENT: 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn the Redevelopment Agency and reconvene as the City Council. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. G. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday, January 12, 2021; February 2, 2021; and Tuesday, February 9, 2021. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the Work Session meeting minutes of Tuesday, January 12, 2021; February 2, 2021 and February 9, 2021. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass H. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Ordinance: Learned Alley Vacation (1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028, io3o, and 1032 West Learned Avenue) The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley adjacent to properties at 1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028, 103o and 1032 West Learned Avenue. The applicant petitioned to vacate the 18o-foot long section of public alley to consolidate the properties immediately abutting the alley. If approved, the applicant plans to consolidate the lots adjacent to the alley and construct a multi-family residential structure. The proposed project would still need to meet relevant zoning requirements and the applicant would need to submit a separate petition. The closure will not impact traffic or access. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00572. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Brian Fullmer presented the Learned Alley Vacation(1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028, 103o and 1032 West Learned Avenue). Carolyn Fleming spoke in favor of the proposal. Morgan Call spoke in opposition to the ordinance. Pachuco Lautaro requested the Council deny the ordinance. John Kivlovitz stated the development was destroying a community that had been there for years. Devin O'Donnell asked the Council to find a better solution for the property, affordable housing was not promised,the projects kept moving residents and not finding solutions. Taylor Monney stated the ordinance would allow further gentrification of the community and urged the Council to vote no on the ordinance. Anne Charles stated this was not wanted by members of the community and would further hurt the community. Riley Rogers stated he understood the concerns of the community, residents were paid for the properties, assisted with moving and everyone was able to find better housing than what they were currently living in. Emily Alworth spoke in opposition to the ordinance and alley vacation and said people in the community were speaking out against this ordinance and did not want the development. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass 2. Ordinance: Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley known as the Fern Subdivision Alley, located between l000 East and iioo East and between Wood Avenue and Logan Avenue. The east-west portion of the alley runs behind eight homes between ioig East and 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 1053 East Logan Avenue. Petition No.: PLNPCM2018-0046 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Brian Fullmer presented the Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation. Devin O'Donnell asked why the alley needed to be vacated and what the alley would be used for. Kathleen A. Bratcher reviewed the reasoning for vacating the alley and using it for access to adjacent properties. Rachel Bicknell spoke in support of vacating the alley as it would create a quiet and secure location. Joshua Lenhart spoke in support of the ordinance, asked that once the alley was vacated the property lines did not get moved. Janet Cortez suggested that the alley be maintained to help traffic congestion. Roni Danish spoke in favor of vacating the alley, said it would be good for the City and help control the crime in the area. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE:Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result: 6—0 Pass 3. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 9 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. The proposed amendment includes funding for building office space to accommodate expansion of the Emergency 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Management Division, technology upgrades for the 911 Department, and reimbursements to the Fire Department, among other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 4, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, May 4, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ordinances listed below (114-1115) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22. All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May i8th and June ist public hearings. Minutes: Ben Luedtke presented Budget Amendment No. 9 for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Anne Charles spoke to the Raise Up SLC funds that were not allocated and urged the Council to allocate the funding to individuals that needed it; expressed opposition to the Convention hotel tax incentives. George Chapman stated refunding police impact fees to developers was not the answer,providing the east side police precinct should be a higher priority. Emily Alworth stated impact fees were mismanaged and police funds needed to be reviewed. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to continue the public hearing to June 1, 2021. AYE:Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result: 6-0 Pass 4. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2021- 22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 5. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees pursuant to the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011,which shall become effective on proper ratification and signature. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 6. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 7. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 8. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 9. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association, representing eligible employees for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 1o. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 11. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 12. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 13. Ordinance: Work in the Public Way Fees The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to definitions and fees of work in the public way. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 14. Ordinance: City Departments Organizational Changes The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to the organizational changes with the Department of Public Services, the proposed Department of Public Lands, and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN). The Mayor's proposed budget would transfer the Engineering Division and Youth and Family Division between the CAN and Public Services Departments. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation- Refer to motion sheet(s). 15. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 1, 2021 This concludes the public hearings for the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for FY 2021-22. All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May 18th and June isc public hearings. Minutes: Jennifer Bruno presented the following items: 4. Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2021-22 5. Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 6. Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 7. Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 8. Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2021-22 9. Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association lo. Adopting the rate of tax levy,including the levy for the Library Fund,for Fiscal Year 2021-22 11. Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22 12. Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22 13. Work in the Public Way Fees 14. City Departments Organizational Changes 15. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund Council Member Fowler stated additional work session meetings in 2021 would be held for the budget on: May 25,June 1,June 3, and one additional in June(TBD)before the budget was adopted. 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 George Chapman spoke to the need to increase funding for police officers; City should stop using consultants; pocket libraries were needed; suggested separating budget items to allow the public to comment on each item. Tyeer Houser asked the Council to support the budget for the Liberty Hills tennis courts. Kali Mower spoke to the CIP budget recommendation for Odyssey House that was underfunded by$took and expressed concern about the general safety of the people that used the services due to the buildings condition. Ainsley Moench spoke to de-funding the police. Anne Charles stated the Odyssey House needed additional funding and increasing the police budget did not reconstruct the system. Emily Alworth spoke in opposition to the increase of funding for the police department. Deborah Chaltron stated tennis centers were in need of attention and it was time for the City to invest in their amenities. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to close the Public Hearings for items H4-H15 and refer to the public Hearings on June 1, 2021. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass I. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 8 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. The proposed amendment includes funding for Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training certifications and re-certifications, hiring a class of lateral police officers, and a donation to Switchpoint to create a shelter for low-income seniors and veterans, among other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 20, 2021 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 15 of 2021, amending the FY 2020-21 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document. • A-i: Hire Lateral Class of Police Officers - ($314,899 - Fund Balance) • A-2: Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Training for Police Department- ($117,400 - General Fund • $322,800 Training Holding Account) • A-3: Donation to Switchpoint to Create Shelter for Low-Income Seniors and Veterans - ($2 million; - • $1 million each from General Fund's Fund Balance and Funding Our Future's Fund Balance • I-1: (Tentative) Ranked Choice Voting(RCV) ($1oo,000 - $5o,000 from Fund Balance and$50,000 budget created to accept external funding) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers ABSTAIN: Dennis Faris Final Result: 6-0 Pass 2. Ordinance: 2o58 North 2200 West Zoning Map Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would rezone property at 2058 North 2200 West from Agricultural District (AG-2) to Light Manufacturing (M-1). The amendment would accommodate future commercial land uses such as retail and service type businesses not permitted under the current zoning. No specific site development proposal has been submitted at this time.Although the applicant has requested that the property be rezoned to M-1, consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No. PLNPCM2018-oo657. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, March 26, 2019 and Tuesday, May 4, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,June 11, 2019 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, July 9, 2o19 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 16 of 2021, amending the zoning map pertaining to the parcel at approximately 2o58 North 2200 West from AG-2,Agricultural to M-1, Manufacturing. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers ABSTAIN: Dennis Faris Final Result: 6—0 Pass J. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: There were no questions. 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Beverly Cooper, Hilary Jacobs, Daniel Schelling, Steven Stepanek, Debbie Feder, and Scott Williams spoke about the Foothills trails projects,trails needing to be done correctly and accountability emphasized,requested the Council halt construction for further assessments and proper discovery,to reconsider the plan,protect the area and revegetate what had been removed. Natalia Southham,Anne Charles, Chris Butler,Alexandra Paretta, and Josh Campbell spoke to de-funding police and using the funds to subsidize housing for the unsheltered community,lack of usefulness of the police presence, and funding adjusted to employ social workers. Mark Barrett spoke to the issues with animal control services,tethering animals should not be regulated when an animal was on its own property and enjoyed being outside. George Chapman spoke in support of funding the police, social workers were not appropriate for homeless issues where drugs were involved; needed properly trained police officers that know how to address mental health issues. Council and Staff discussed access to the police documents and the current pause for 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 assessment regarding the Foothills trail plan. K. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Advice and Consent: Debbie Lyons — Director of Sustainability The Council will consider approving the appointment of Debbie Lyons as the Director of the Sustainability Department. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve advice and consent of Debbie Lyons as the Director of Sustainability. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass L. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: SQF, LLC Master License Agreement for Small Cell Installation in the Right-of-Way The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would grant a master license agreement for wireless facilities in the public way to SQF, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The agreement would allow this small cell provider to install and maintain small cell infrastructure within the City rights-of-way, subject to conditions in the agreement and after securing specific site approvals. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Rogers to adopt Ordinance 17 of 2021, granting a Master License Agreement to SQF, LLC. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers ABSTAIN: Dennis Faris Final Result: 6-0 Pass 2. Ordinance: SQF, LLC Telecommunications Franchise Agreement The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would grant a telecommunication franchise agreement to SQF, LLC. The agreement would allow the company to place its facilities within the City rights-of-way, governed by certain conditions and after securing permits, and provides for the payment of the telecommunications tax pursuant to State statute. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 18 of 2021, granting a Telecommunication Franchise Agreement to SQF, LLC. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers ABSTAIN: Dennis Faris Final Result: 6-0 Pass 3. Ordinance: Google Fiber Utah Amended and Restated Broadband Services Franchise The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve an amended and restated broadband services franchise agreement to Google Fiber Utah, LLC. Google Fiber intends to discontinue video services to its customer base. The amended and restated franchise agreement has been negotiated to omit video 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 services, change the fee structure and authorize broadband for a 15-year term. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 19 of 2021, approving the Amended and Restated Broadband Services Franchise agreement with Google Fiber Utah, LLC. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers ABSTAIN: Dennis Faris Final Result: 6—0 Pass 4. Resolution: Housing Trust Fund Loan Amendment to Garden Lofts Holdings, LP, at i54 West 600 South The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize two changes to the original loan agreement between the City's Housing Trust Fund and Garden Lofts Holding, LP. The loan was originally granted in December 2017 to help fund an affordable multi-family development that consists of 272 units, all at or below 6o% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The proposed amendments would change future rental rates to reflect an "income-averaging" approach, as well as the City's loan position, which would shift to third, behind a new private loan to the developers to cover increased construction charges. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 11, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to 22 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 adopt Resolution 18 of 2o2i, authorizing the loan amendment from the Housing Trust Fund to Garden Lofts Holdings, LP. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass M. CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, June 8, 2021 to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes a request to increase the Library's General Fund budget to account for pass-through property tax revenue collected by Salt Lake County which goes directly to the Utah Inland Port Authority and the Convention Facility. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the consent agenda. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7—0 Pass N. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 9:15 pm Formal Minutes Approved March 22, 2022 23 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 18, 2021 LBA Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: Local Building Authority Redevelopment Agency Chair City Council Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code§52-4- 203(2)(b) To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the`Document Relationships'information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal Session meeting held Tuesday,May 18, 2021. 24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Pending Not Approved The Local Building Authority,the Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday,June 1, 2021 in an Electronic Meeting, pursuant to the Redevelopment Agency and City Council Chairs'determination. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katie Lewis —City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman— City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson—Minutes and Records Clerk, Ben Luedtke— Senior Public Policy Analyst, Robert Nutzman— Administrative Assistant Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm. 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Council/Board Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings. Minutes: Board Member Fowler welcomed everyone in attendance. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all those in attendance. 3- Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Board Member Fowler reviewed the rules of decorum. B. LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution: Local Building Authority Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Local Building Authority(LBA) of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22, including the Capital Projects Fund. The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-22 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno provided an introduction to the Resolution. Joseph Johnson spoke regarding the importance of sustainability projects, suggested increased funding for Sustainability and Public Lands Commissions. Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o C. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and reconvene as the Redevelopment Agency. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. RDA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Jennifer Bruno provided a brief introduction to the Resolution. George Chapman spoke to the need of affordable housing, allowing form-based zoning, encouraging bus usage, and allowing housing at the International Center. Casey McDonough spoke regarding the Pantages Theater and the GRAMA request regarding the property, asked for the budget to not be approved, and to hold an outside third party investigation regarding the sale of the Pantages Theater. Ian Harris spoke to the availability/importance of low income housing and the need to make it a priority. Pachuco Lautaro spoke regarding the Pantages Theater and his feelings about the way the property was sold. 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Afa`Aikona spoke regarding support of the Pantages Theater, suggested support of the communities that used the theater to make a living. Michael Valentine spoke in support of Pride Day, asked for support of the Pantages Theater, and spoke on the Redevelopment Agency's role in the sale of the property. Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass E. RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adjourn as the Redevelopment Agency and reconvene as the City Council. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F. CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday, September 29, 2020. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the Work Session meeting minutes for Tuesday, September 29, 2020. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7— o Pass 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 2. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall celebrating Pride Month. Minutes: Council Member Wharton read the Resolution. Council Member Fowler recognized Rob Moolman from the Utah Pride Center,thanked him for all his work with the Queer Community and the services they provided. Mayor Mendenhall thanked those that attended the Pride Flag raising at the City& County Building, expressed her excitement over the upcoming Pride festival and thanked everyone for working on the Resolution. Rob Moolman(Utah Pride Center Director)spoke to the importance of the Resolution and the emotion he felt listening to the Resolution being read. He thanked everyone involved in processing and adopting the Resolution. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt joint ceremonial Resolution i9 of 2o2i, celebrating Pride Month. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7— o Pass G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 9 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. The proposed amendment includes funding for building office space to accommodate expansion of the Emergency Management Division,technology upgrades for the 911 Department, and reimbursements to the Fire Department, among other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 4, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, May 4, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 The following items are all related to the proposed annual budget for Salt Lake City. The City's budget includes items for each department,services and programs, and capital projects(known as CIP). Each of ordinances listed below(G2-G13)are associated with the implementation of the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City,including the Library Fund,for the Fiscal Year(FY) 2021-22.All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May 18th and June 1st public hearings.For a link to the full budget proposal,please click here. Minutes: Benjamin Luedtke provided a brief introduction to the Budget Amendment. George Chapman spoke to the loss of police officers due to finding employment with other agencies and suggested implementing a$1o,000 retention bonus. Catherine Muligan spoke in regard to Mr. Chapman's comments regarding pay for police officers versus UTA bus drivers. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2021- 22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees pursuant to the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011, which shall become effective on proper ratification and signature. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 5. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 6. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association, representing eligible employees for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 8. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-TBD Staff Recommendation- Refer to motion sheet(s). 9. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). II MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 lo. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation- Refer to motion sheet(s). 11. Ordinance: Work in the Public Way Fees The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to definitions and fees of work in the public way. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 12. Ordinance: City Departments Organizational Changes The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to the organizational changes with the Department of Public Services, the proposed Department of Public Lands, and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN). The Mayor's proposed budget would transfer the Engineering Division and Youth 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 and Family Division between the CAN and Public Services Departments. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 13. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). This concludes the public hearings for the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for FY 2021-22. Minutes: Jennifer Bruno provided an introductions regarding the FY21-22 budget items(Items G 2- G13). Eliza McKinney spoke to defunding the police and investing in the community. Beverly Cooper spoke to the Public Lands Budget and Trails Master Plan goals, environmental sustainability and use should be protected;the trails had deteriorated the area and should be made to meet the goals as outlined in the Master Plan. 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Josh Kivlovitz spoke in opposition of the police budget, Council was going against what was promised and what the community was asking for, and urged the Council to defund the police. Brinley Froelich spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police; money should be used for individuals that needed services. Liz DeFriez spoke in opposition to gentrification and the police budget; asked the Council to defund the police as proposed and reinvest the funds where they were needed. Crystal Ke spoke in opposition to the police budget, as well as showing support for the LGBTQ Community; asked the Council to defund the police and focus the funding to places to support communities. Taylor Monney spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Abhay Goel spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to use the funding to help those in need/provide services. Maeve Wall spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police; remove officers from schools and fund school positions that were necessary. Anne Charles asked the Council to cut the police budget in half and provide mental health services for those that needed it. George Chapman spoke to the loss of police officers, and the need for retention/higher pay to keep the deescalation trained officers. Natalia Southam spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defend the police. Ian Harris spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Pachuco Lautaro spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Erin Moore spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Thia Aikona spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Michael Valentine spoke regarding saving the Pantages Theater, offered support for the Brown Berets, and supported defunding the Police Department. 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Charles Becker spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Caroline Kellough spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Kathryn Mulliken spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked for public restrooms for the homeless to use. Taylor Lynn Berry spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Haleigh Lamer spoke in opposition to the police budget and said funding should be used to support mental health services for all individuals. Anna Bugbee spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defend the police. Anna Davis spoke in opposition to the police budget and asked the Council to defund the police. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Faris to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7— o Pass H. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Learned Alley Vacation (1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028, io3o, and 1032 West Learned Avenue) The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley adjacent to properties at 1025 West North Temple and 1022, 1028, 103o and 1032 West Learned Avenue. The applicant petitioned to vacate the 18o-foot long section of public alley to consolidate the properties immediately abutting the alley. If approved, the applicant plans to consolidate the lots adjacent to the alley and construct a multi-family residential structure. The proposed project would still need to meet relevant zoning requirements and the applicant would need to submit a separate petition. The closure will not impact traffic or access. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00572. 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 21 of 2021,vacating the subject alley. AYE:Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result: 6 - o Pass 2. Ordinance: Fern Subdivision Alley Vacation The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley known as the Fern Subdivision Alley, located between l000 East and 11oo East and between Wood Avenue and Logan Avenue. The east-west portion of the alley runs behind eight homes between 1o19 East and 1053 East Logan Avenue. Petition No.: PLNPCM2o18-o046 FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 6, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 22 of 2021,vacating the subject alley. AYE:Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Final Result: 6 — o Pass I. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: There were no questions. 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Toby Larson asked the Council to investigate vehicle use and how to reduce air pollution. Tamara White spoke to the issues at Palmer Court; the community was lacking consistency in safety, suggested family only units in community housing, and increasing security issues as the property was not a safe place. Cindy Cromer spoke regarding land use and the financial consequences of wayward land use,the City's involvement with Trolley Square Ventures and how the City lost money due the proceedings; the cost of the project and disruption in the neighborhood were considerable; a small area plan should be used for the block to prevent the issues that came from the proposal of developing the parking lot. Adam Whitt spoke regarding the Tennis Centers and asked to provide more funding to the centers to protect them for the future. George Chapman stated Transportation impact fees should not be used for anything other than streets, consultants were ruining the City such as Miller Park, Fountain art should be protected,and asked to find a way to keep officers who all ready had valuable deescalation training. Daniel Schelling, Hilary Jocobs, and Gavin Noyes spoke to the the pause on the Foothills Master Plan implementation,more review was needed before moving forward with Phase II of the project,include all types of uses on the trails, revisions and expansions to the plan by allowing a citizen's alternative board to assist in adding aspects overlooked in the current plan. Brinley Froelichm, Maeve Wall and Emiliano Love spoke in opposition to the Learned alley vacation and suggested the City should place a moratorium on new 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 development to investigate best practices for incorporating low-income housing into new developments, expected more public discussion on the item, and said the project was displacing families and should not be allowed. Pachuco Lautaro and D Tavi spoke to the ordinance regarding the Lusso Apartments that would displace the current residents and increase gentrification on the Westside. Michael Valentine and David Berg spoke regarding the history of the Pantages Theater;the sale needed to be stopped,the theater should be added to the historic registry and be restored. Austin Wood and Eric Nelson spoke in support of de-funding the police; urged the Council to listen to the community and their concerns; funds should be used for benefiting the most disenfranchised people in the city. Council Member Wharton spoke regarding the gentrification mitigation plan that would be brought to the Council for public comment and encouraged people to participate in the discussion. J. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Issuance of Series 2021 Bonds for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the sale of Airport Revenue Bond issued to continue to finance construction of the new Salt Lake City International Airport. The resolution would involve the sale of up to $1 billion in limited obligation bonds that would be repaid solely by revenue generated at the Salt Lake City International Airport. The project is scheduled to be fully complete in 2024. The resolution also sets the date of July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment on the proposed bond,which is listed under tonight's Consent Agenda for consistency with other set-date items. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Rogers to adopt Resolution 21 of 2021,to: • Authorize up to $1 billion of airport revenue bonds to finance capital improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport; • Authorize certain officials and officers to approve the final terms and provision of the bonds within the parameters in the resolution; • Authorize and approve the execution and delivery of a third supplemental trust indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and a continuing disclosure agreement. • Provide for the publication of notice of a July 13, 2021 public hearing to receive comment from the public with respect to the issuance of the bonds, and the potential economic impact the capital improvements will have on the private sector; • Provide for the running of a contest period; and • Authorize all other necessary actions AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Motion: Meeting Remotely Without an Anchor Location The Council will consider a motion to ratify the Chair's determination to continue meeting remotely and without an anchor location due to the health and safety of the people who may be in attendance, and considering the continued closure of the City and County Building to the public. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Rogers to to meet remotely without a anchor location and ratify the Chair's determination under State Law. 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Amendment to Fiscal Year 2021 Appointed Employees Plan The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Appendix B ("Appointed Employees by Department") of the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Annual Compensation Plan for Non-Represented Employees of Salt Lake City Corporation. This would recognize the existing Deputy Chief of Staff position in the Mayor's Office. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Rogers to adopt Ordinance 23 of 2021, amending the FY2i Annual Compensation Plan Appendix B for appointed employees. AYE: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement for Reconfiguration of the Gilmer Drive Intersection The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize approval of an interlocal cooperation agreement between the City and Salt Lake County. The County will reimburse the City up to $55,365 for reconfiguration of the goo South and Gilmer Drive intersection and other related improvements. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Resolution 20 of 2o2i, authorizing the approval of an Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County with respect to the County's transfer of up to $55,365 to reimburse the City for reconfiguration of the Gilmore Drive intersection and other related improvements. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass L. CONSENT: 1. Resolution: Issuance of Series 2021 Bonds for Financing the construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 P.M. to accept public comment about a resolution that would authorize the sale of Airport Revenue Bond issued to continue to finance construction of the new Salt Lake City International Airport. The resolution would involve the sale of up to $1 billion in limited obligation bonds that would be repaid solely by revenue generated at the Salt Lake City International Airport. The project is scheduled to be fully complete in 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board (PCRB) - Joshua Isbell 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 The Council will consider approving the appointment of Joshua Isbell to the PCRB for a term ending September 2, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 1, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 3. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board (PCRB) — Justin Rodriguez The Council will consider approving the appointment of Justin Rodriguez to the PCRB for a term ending September 2, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4. Board Reappointment: Arts Council — Dave Mortensen The Council will consider reappointing Dave Mortensen to the Arts Council for a term ending May 1, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 22 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 5. Board Reappointment: Arts Council - Katherine Potter The Council will consider reappointing Katherine Potter to the Arts Council for a term ending May 1, 2024. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt the Consent Agenda except for Item L3 -the appointment of Justin Rodriguez. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers, Dennis Faris Final Result: 7- o Pass M. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 9:35 Pm. Formal Minutes Approved: July 12, 2022 LBA Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: Local Building Authority and City Council Chair 23 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Redevelopment Agency Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen within the `Document Relationships' information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, June 1, 2021. 24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 The Local Building Authority,the Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday,June 1-5, 2021 in an Electronic Meeting, pursuant to the Redevelopment Agency and City Council Chairs'determination. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris, Darin Mano,James Rogers Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katie Lewis —City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman— City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson—Minutes and Records Clerk, Robert Nutzman—Administrative Assistant, Sylvia Richards — Public Policy Analyst Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Council/Board Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings. Minutes: Council/Board Member Fowler welcomed all to the meeting. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 3- Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council/Board Member Fowler reviewed the meeting rules of decorum and the role of City Council Members as members of the Local Building Authority and the Redevelopment Agency. B. LBA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Resolution: Local Building Authority Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Local Building Authority(LBA) of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22, including the Capital Projects Fund. The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-22 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to approve Resolution og of 2o2i, adopting the Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2o2i-22 of the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano ABSENT: Chris Wharton Final Result: 6 - o Pass C. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Faris to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and Convene as the Redevelopment Agency AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. RDA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Resolution: RDA Budget Amendment No.i for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Board will consider adopting a resolution amending the final budget of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments in the Redevelopment Agency's budget, including proposed project additions and modifications, and staffing changes. The amendment includes adjusting estimated property tax increment revenues based on actual amounts received, additional funding for Station Center public infrastructure in the Depot District, a to-be- decided catalytic development along North Temple, a new community and cultural initiative in the Granary District, and other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 13, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 2 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Valdemoros to adopt Resolution 11 of 2021, amending the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 final budget of the Redevelopment Agency as proposed by the Administration with the Granary District Community&Cultural Initiative funding going into a holding account. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2. Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 18, 2021; Tuesday, June 1, 2021; and Tuesday, June 8, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 12 of 2o2i, approving the FY22 RDA Budget reflected in the attached Key Changes spreadsheet with the clarifications shown on the motion sheet. RDA Capital Projects - $2,947,019 in capital projects are approved which do not lapse to Fund Balance with the understanding that these will return to the Board when specific project/program proposals are available as follows: 1. $83,832 from the Central Business District and$667,535 from Program Income Fund for Storefront&Commercial Revitalization into a holding account 2. $ioo,000 from Block 70 for Regent Street Parking Structure Reserve holding account 3• $332,179 from the Depot District for Station Center Infrastructure holding account 4. $200,000 from the Depot District for Environmental Remediation at Station Center Sites 3 &4 5• $443,731 from the Granary District for Community&Cultural Initiative into a holding account 6. $30,474 from North Temple for the required io% school fund 7. $289,268 from North Temple for a Strategic Interventions holding account 8. $350,000 Northwest Quadrant Shared Costs holding account 9. $200,000 from Program Income Fund for Sustainability Technical Assistance Program holding account 10. $250,000 from Program Income Fund for Gallivan repairs into a holding account 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Board Member Rogers, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 2, items A and B. • A. Energy Efficiency as a Condition of any RDA Project Loans and Investments. It is the intent of the Board that all RDA project loans and investments require certain energy efficiency standards be met as a condition of funding. Staff note: The Council/Board may wish to designate specific energy efficiency or sustainability standards, such as those set out by LEED and other accrediting organizations. (See examples at https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/green-building- standards.) • B. Structure of Accounts within RDA, including Fund Balances and Previous Capital Projects. It is the intent of the Board to review the full structure of RDA accounts, including fund balances and capital projects funded in previous years. The Board may wish to discuss with the RDA and Finance staff the best way to get this information on a real-time basis. Staff note: The City's Enterprise Resource Planning(ERP) effort will help in tracking/providing this information in a less labor- intensive way, although the horizon for full implementation could be a year or longer. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass E. RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Faris, seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn as the Redevelopment Agency and convene as the City Council. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday, February 16, 2021; as well as the formal meeting minutes for February 2, 2021 and February 16, 2021. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the Work Session meeting minutes for February 16, 2021; Formal meeting minutes for February 2, 2021 and February 16, 2021. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2021 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to adopt Resolution 22 of 2021, recognizing June 19th as Juneteenth day in Salt Lake City. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Minutes: Jeanetta Williams (NAACP)thanked the council for the recognition of the Juneteenth proclamation and the creation of the national holiday to recognize the magnitude of the day. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items Gi-G8 will be heard as one public hearing 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 1. Grant Application: 9-Line Railroad Crossing: Transportation Investment Fund-Active Transportation (TIF-Active) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). If awarded,this grant would fund the construction of a bridge or tunnel for the 9- Line Trail at approximately 650 West to provide safe passage for pedestrians and cyclists over or under the freight and passenger rail. The requested funding is based on a planning level cost estimated from similar structures and may change as a more detailed site analysis is completed. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2. Grant Application: Red Butte Creek Trail Investment Fund-Active Transportation (TIF-Active) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). If awarded, this grant would fund the construction of a paved multi-use trail that follows the Red Butte Creek Corridor. The one mile stretch of trail will cross next to or near the creek via a new underpass under Foothill Drive and connect to the University of Utah's family student housing and the Veterans Affairs campus. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 3. Grant Application: 2022 Police Reform and Racial Justice Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the United States Conference of Mayors. The Police Department applied for the Target Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant Program to enhance its mental health and law enforcement co-responder initiative. If awarded, this grant would fund immigrant and minority outreach and education, expanded co-responder team coverage and equipment, and training. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 4. Grant Application: Rose Park Bicycle Pump Track Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Services to the Governor's Office of Economic Development. If awarded, this grant would fund the construction of a new bicycle pump track adjacent to the Day-Riverside Library along the Jordan River Parkway Trail within the Rose Park neighborhood. Local community groups will be asked for feedback to design and develop a unique bicycling amenity that will help activate this open space along the Jordan River and provide a new recreational feature to the Jordan River Parkway trail. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 5. Grant Application: PaddleShare: Facilitating Self-serve Kayak Rental 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 on the Jordan River The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Services to the Governor's Office of Economic Development. If awarded, this grant would fund construction of kayak lockers/stations. Stations will include an enclosed locker system,with multiple lockers containing all the equipment a user needs to paddle on the Jordan River to a downstream station. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 6. Grant Application: Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence Advocate Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Office of the City Attorney to the Utah Office for Victims of Crime. If awarded, this grant would fund a victim advocate to assist and support victims of domestic violence as their cases move to the prosecution and adjudication phases. The services include: information; education and advocacy through the case and prosecution; assistance with victim impact statements; and support and accompaniment to court and meetings with investigators and prosecutors. The Victim Advocate also assists in post-release safety planning, preparation for court appearances, and jail release agreements. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 7. Grant Application: Social Impact Bond Study(EDA CARES Act COVID-19 Recovery Technical Assistance Grant) The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Economic Development to the Wasatch Front Regional Council. If awarded, this grant would fund a consultant to work with the Department of Economic Development to perform a Social Impact Bond Study. The study will assess economic and opportunity disparities with particular focus on Salt Lake City's west side and propose interventions that may help mitigate these disparities.Additionally, the study will identify financing mechanisms to invest in the interventions highlighted in the study. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 8. Grant Application: 2022 Police Traffic Services Equipment Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, this grant would fund the purchase of ioo traffic cones and 5o barricades. These items will be used by the Motor Squad for traffic control during special events, restricting or diverting traffic due to accidents, and other similar uses. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action- n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Minutes: Council Member Fowler provided the rules of decorum. II MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Sylvia Richards provided a brief introduction for each Grant Application. Nigel Swaby spoke in support of grant items G1,G3, and G5,thanked the Police Department for all their hard work in the Fairpark Neighborhood. Grant Bustillos spoke regarding scooter rental companies in the city specifically Lime &Link and expressed support for Byrd Scooters. George Chapman spoke regarding goo South crossing, suggesting the Council not spend money on consultants,was in support for most of the grant applications including the bridge proposal, Red Butte Creek trail(cutting trees/poisoning birds), and expressed the need for bike trail in Emigration. Anne Charles agreed with George's comments on protecting birds/trees and not using consultants, did not support $1oo,000 for Police,need Civilian Response model/not co- responder model, did not support $5000 for traffic cones. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Faris to close the public hearing and refer Items G-i through G-8 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7— o Pass H. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes a request to increase the Library's General Fund budget to account for pass-through property tax revenue collected by Salt Lake County which goes directly to the Utah Inland Port Authority and the Convention Facility. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to adopt Ordinance 24 of 2o21, amending the final budget for the Library Fund for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2o2o, and ending June 30, 2021. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 9 for Fiscal Year 2020-21 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. The proposed amendment includes funding for building office space to accommodate expansion of the Emergency Management Division, technology upgrades for the 911 Department, and reimbursements to the Fire Department, among other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 4, 2021 and Tuesday,June 1, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, May 4, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ordinances listed below (H3-H14) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 25 of 2021, amending the FY 2020-2021 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document as shown on the motion sheet. • A-1: Pulled prior to submission. • A-2: Pulled prior to submission. • A-3: Pulled prior to submission. • A-4: Pulled prior to submission. • A-g: Budgeting for Inland Port Tax Revenue - ($-o-) • A-6: Budgeting for Convention Hotel Tax Revenue - ($-o-) 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 • A-7: Presumption for CARES Act Funding- (-$293,o67- General Fund) • A-8: Fire Emergency Management Office Build Out- ($293,o67- General Fund) • A-9: 9ii-ETM Security Platform - ($41,138 - E9ii Fund) • D-i: Police Impact Fee Refund- ($5io,828 - Police Impact Fees) • D-2: Moving Transportation CIP Projects to CIP Fund- ($8,695,770 - CIP Fund) • D-3: Transfer CIP Funds to Refuse Fund- ($46,982 - CIP Fund) • D-4: Transfer Bond Funds from 700 West Cost Center to Bond Contingency- ($917,854 - CIP Fund) • D-5: Corrections for Debt Transfer Errors in Original Adopted Budget - ($78,291 - Debt Service/General Fund) • D-6: Donation Fund Increase - ($200,000 - Donation Fund) • D-7: Fire Department -Wildland/Search&Rescue Deployments - ($230,683 - General Fund) • D-8: Fire Department- Other Reimbursements - ($59,126 - General Fund) • D-9: Fire Department COVID Costs - ($6o5,435 - General Fund) • E-1: Salt Lake County, CATNIP, Reconfigure Gilmer Drive - ($55,365 - CIP Fund) • E-2: CARES Act Third Tranche - ($15o,000 - Grant Fund) • G-1: Utah State Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services, FY2o Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program- ($19,5oo - Grant Fund) • I-1: Council-added item ARPA Reimbursement to General Fund Balance for Eligible Employee Bonuses - ($1,193,000 from ARPA) • I-2: Council-added item Re-scope Remaining Budget for the Salt Laker Card to allow second$5oo payments, $1,000 new cards and covering nonprofit program administration costs. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass 3. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2o2i- 22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2-021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees pursuant to the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011,which shall become effective on proper ratification and signature. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Placeholder 5. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 6. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 8. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association, representing eligible employees for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Placeholder 9. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 1o. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 11. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Placeholder 12. Ordinance: Work in the Public Way Fees The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to definitions and fees of work in the public way. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 13. Ordinance: City Departments Organizational Changes The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to the organizational changes with the Department of Public Services, the proposed Department of Public Lands, and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN). The Mayor's proposed budget would transfer the Engineering Division and Youth and Family Division between the CAN and Public Services Departments. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 14. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno gave a brief overview of the FY 2021-22 City Budget. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to Motion 1: adopt Ordinance 32 of 2021, approving Salt Lake City's Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the Library Fund. updated 2:05 pm Adopts City Budget except Library&CIP(agenda item H14) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to Motion 2: adopt Ordinance 33 of 2021 approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22. updated 2:05 p.m. Adopts Library Fund Budget(agenda Item Hio) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano to Motion 3: adopt Ordinance 34 of 2021 setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2o21-22 as listed on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax Commission.A tax of.004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which: A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating$433,129 of one-time revenue; and 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating$17,315,863 of on-going revenue; and D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating$20,979,219 of on-going revenue; and E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating$83,554 of one-time revenue. updated 2:05 pm Sets all tax rates (agenda item H9) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to Motion 4: adopt$37,355,4o6 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING$8,572,651 in funding for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year. updated 2:05 pm CIP&Debt Service AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to Motion 5: adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5, items A through E. • A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties. • B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2o21,to other areas of the City. 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 • C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund. • a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures, • b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan, • c. Golf Food and Beverage Options.A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances,with the goal of removing barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority. • D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of"public safety"for allocation of Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch,but also any social workers and non- emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City's public safety alternative response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 9ii Dispatch since FY2o2o.) • E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage. updated 2:o5 pm Adopts legislative intent statements/interim study items AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Rogers to Motion 6: adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2o2i- 22 budget. • A. (Ordinance 26 of 2o2i)Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2o22, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing eligible employees in City departments. 22 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 • B. (Ordinance 27 of 2o21)Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2o22 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire Department. • C. (Ordinance 28 of 2021)Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department. • D. (Ordinance 29 of 2021)Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing salary figures by 2%based on the Council's final adopted FY22 annual budget. • E. (Ordinance 30 of 2021)Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public Right of Way • F. (Ordinance 31 of 2o21)Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of the Public Lands Department Updated 2:05 pm all other budget-related ordinances including compensation(agenda items H3-H8 and H11-H13) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass I. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: Council Members thanked the Mayor and administration for all the work on the 2021- 2022 budget. 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Council Member Fowler reiterated the rules of decorum and public comment. 23 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Nigel Swaby spoke regarding a letter to the Mayor and Council, regarding the clean up of North Temple Business District,requesting support of the community in cleaning up the area, attend the Community Council meetings to help solve the problem. Maria Laposata, Grant Bustillos, Gabriela Paz, Robert Singleton Alex McMillan spoke in support of Bird scooters,the benefits to the community and the need for this type of transportation in the city. Daniel Schelling and Beverly Cooper spoke regarding the Foothill Trails master plan, requesting release of funds only be done after an outside party reviewed the current status of the trails and improvements to ensure future improvements were implemented correctly. Council Member Wharton took a moment of personal privilege regarding the public trails to encourage anyone speaking to the trails review the intent language that was adopted. Katie Pappas spoke regarding the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District,its history, adversely affecting environment/birds, and that it needed to reevaluation to protect the city. George Chapman spoke regarding lack of police officers, Mosquito Abatement District, and saving trees in Miller Park. J. NEW BUSINESS: NONE. K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. L. CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 85o and 87o East 2100 South The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 P.M. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties at approximately 85o and 87o East 2100 South. The proposal would rezone the properties from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District) and would amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Sugar House Master Plan from "Mixed Use - Low Intensity" to "Business District Mixed-Use -Neighborhood Scale."The intent of the request is to allow more flexibility to develop a future multi-family residential, office, or mixed-use development. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM202o-oogo6 and 00925. 24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 810 East Boo South The Council will set the date of Tuesday,July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map for a parcel of property at 810 East 80o South. The proposal would rezone the parcel from R-2 (Single- and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business District) and would amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. The applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a two-story building that would have commercial space on the first floor, residential units on the second floor, and parking located to the rear. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-0074o and PLNPCM2020-00741 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3. Board Appointment: Art Design Board — Meggie Troili The Council will consider approving the appointment of Meggie Troili to the Art Design Board for a term ending June 15, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a 25 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4. Board Appointment: Art Design Board — Tiffini Porter The Council will consider approving the appointment of Tiffini Porter to the Art Design Board for a term ending June 15, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City —William Davis The Council will consider approving the appointment of William Davis to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending June 15, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board (PCRB) — Justin Rodriguez The Council will consider approving the appointment of Justin Rodriguez to the PCRB for a term ending September 2, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council 26 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Staff Recommendation - Set date. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Dennis Faris,James Rogers, Darin Mano Final Result: 7- o Pass M. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at: 8:20 pm Formal Minutes Approved: September 6, 2022 RDA Minutes Approved: November 10, 2022 27 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 15, 2021 LBA Minutes Approved: Local Building Authority and City Council Chair Redevelopment Agency Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.sic.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen within the 'Document Relationships' information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, June 15, 2021. 28 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 PENDING MINUTES — NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority and City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,August 17, 2021 in an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair's determination. The following Council Members were present: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katie Lewis — City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman— City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson— Deputy City Recorder, Ben Luedtke— Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer—Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst,Jennifer Bruno — Deputy Director,Nick Tarbet— Senior Public Policy Analyst, Thais Stewart—Minutes and Records Clerk,Taylor Hill—Council Staff Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 6:oi pm 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 A. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Council/Board Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings. Minutes: Council Member Fowler welcomed attendees to the meeting. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: Moment of silence was held while the Pledge of Allegiance was displayed on the screen. 3• Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council Member Fowler explained the rules of decorum. Jennifer Bruno clarified public comments would not be taken during the Local Building Authority meeting. B. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1 Resolution: Local Building Authority Lease Revenue Bonds Series 201gA and 2014A The Board will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the redemption of certain outstanding lease revenue bonds; authorizing the execution and delivery of certain related documents and providing for related matters. (Note: the Local Building Authority is set up for budget matters relating to the construction of the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries.) FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 4 of 2021 authorizing the redemption of Lease Revenue Bonds Series 2oi3A and 2014A and related matters. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result: 6 - o Pass C ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and reconvene as the City Council. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton ABSENT:Ana Valdemoros Final Result: 6 - o Pass 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI-Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday, November 10, 202o and meeting minute excerpts relating to the Airport Bond Resolution actions from Tuesday, June 1, 2021 and Tuesday,July 13, 2021. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve Work Session meeting minutes of Tuesday, November 1o, 2020, and meeting minute excerpts relating to the Airport Bond Resolution actions from Tuesday, June 1, 2021, and Tuesday, July 13, 2021. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton ABSENT: Ana Valdemoros Final Result: 6 — o Pass E. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Ordinance: Rezone at 329-331 South boo East (Encircle) The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would rezone the property at 329-331 South boo East from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-family Residential District) to R-MU-35 (Residential/Mixed Use District). The proposed rezone to R-MU would allow for a cafe eatery within the existing building,which is not currently permitted under the existing RMF-35 zoning designation. This property houses the offices of Encircle Family and Youth Services Center a nonprofit working with LGBTQ+ people and their friends and families. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00268 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 24, 2021 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Nick Tarbet provided a short introduction to the proposed rezone ordinance. Shaylee Syme expressed excitement for the project and its benefits to the community. Jacob Dunford gave a brief history of the Encircle, its LGBTQ friendly area,thanked the City Council for the support of the project and expressed excitement for the growth and services the project would provide to the community. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to close the Public Hearing and adopt Ordinance 45 of 2021, a rezone of the property at approximately 329-331 South and 600 East(Encircle)from RMF- 35 to R-MU-35• AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Ordinance: Goshen Street Alley Vacation The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would close and vacate a portion of a City-owned alley at approximately 740 South Goshen Street between Goshen Street and approximately 1075 West as a public right-of-way. The applicant owns the adjacent lot north of the alley and would like to incorporate the alleyway with that lot. Petition No.: 40o-o6-05 FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 24, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Minutes: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance. Tair Kiphibane spoke in support of the alley vacation. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7— o Pass 3. Ordinance: Rosewood Park Street and Alley Vacation at 1400 North 1200 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate five unimproved City-owned alleys and six unimproved City-owned streets, situated within Rosewood Park located at approximately 140o North 1200 West. The proposal would allow for the consolidation of property to simplify the permitting process for future improvement projects. Petition No.: PLNPCM2019- 01036 and PLNPCM2019-01037 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 24, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance. No public comments Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7— o Pass 4. Ordinance: Administrative Decision Appeals Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment an consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning ordinance pertaining to appeals of administrative decisions.Administrative decisions are those made by the Planning Commission, Historic Landmark Commission, or the Zoning Administrator in the administration of the zoning ordinance. The amendments primarily clarify what matters can be decided by the City's Appeals Hearing Officer, who can appeal decisions, and when an appeal can stay a decision, modify City Code to align with State law, related case law, and make other clarifications to the appeals chapter of the zoning ordinance, including: • Clarify that the City Appeals Hearing Officer can only make decisions regarding the interpretation and application of provisions of Salt Lake City Code, not provisions regarding the interpretation and application of provisions of the Utah State Code, the Utah Constitution, Utah common law or federal law. • Modify the list of allowed appellants to the land use applicant, City board or officer, or"an adversely affected party"to comply with new State Code. • Eliminate automatic stays of decisions.An appellant would have to specifically request and justify a"stay" (a hold on further proceedings on a matter)when appealing an administrative decision. The proposed amendments affect Chapter 21A.16 of the zoning ordinance. Related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning may be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00352 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 24, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Minutes: Nick Tarbet provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance. No public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass 5• Ordinance: Text Amendment Eliminating the Special Exception Process from the Zoning Ordinance The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would delete and eliminate the special exception process from the zoning ordinance.A special exception is a minor alteration of a dimensional requirement of the zoning ordinance or addresses accessory uses and structures. The purpose of this proposal is to amend the zoning ordinance related to special exceptions to accomplish the following: • Simplify the zoning ordinance by updating regulations and eliminating special exceptions; • Reallocate staff resources away from processing land use applications that favor individual properties and towards updating zoning codes to align with adopted master plans; • Increase predictability and reduce neighbor conflicts that are created by requests for exceptions to the zoning regulations; There are more than forty special exceptions authorized in the zoning ordinance. The proposal addresses each special exception and results in each special exception being deleted, permitted, or authorized through a different process in the zoning ordinance. Some special exceptions that will become permitted include changes to standards to add flexibility and reduce impacts. Special exceptions are approved by staff of the Planning Division, the Planning Commission, or Historic Landmark Commission. Related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning and Title 14 may be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM202o-00606 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 20, 2021 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,August 24, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Nick Tarbet provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance. David Davis commented on the impact to the property value in the area and potential adverse impacts which would require continued monitoring. Adam Spikell commented on the current impacts and directed Council to read the email he submitted. Melissa Reagan commented on Verizon Wireless support for the proposed ordinance and asked for clarification on ground mounted utility boxes for service providers. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Rogers to close the Public Hearing, ask the Planning Staff to return with a few potential recommendations that may mitigate the impact of outdoor dining on adjacent residential uses and address the red lines from Verizon Wireless. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass 6. Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program,which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of five or more years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 in the annual budget process,while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same year. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 1, 2021; Tuesday, July 13, 2021; Tuesday, July 20, 2021; and Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, June 8, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment- Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. and Tuesday,August 17, 2021 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 24, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Ben Luedtke provided a brief introduction to the proposed resolution. Beka Huber, Sean Whaley,Allison Dieterie,Ashley Patterson,Amy Wylie and Nicole Farley spoke in favor of the community garden and the community engagement it would create. Jan Crable commented on how dangerous the traffic was on Capitol Hill and asked the Council to fund projects to reduce to traffic in the area. Mirko Radosevic and Bruce Wood spoke to the importance of the tennis center in the community and asked Council to support the funds to assist with associated projects. David Troester commented on the three creeks projects and asked for the Council's approval, also asked the Council to approve the roadway and trail at the same time to save the City money. George Chapman commented on the the projects listed for CIP funding and how the system needed to be updated. David Scheer spoke in support for traffic projects on Capitol Hill. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the Public Hearing. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Final Result: 7- o Pass F. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: G. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: Council Member Fowler asked the Mayor questions concerning COVID-19 and school opening updates. Mayor Mendenhall stated that a mask order was pending and conversations with School Board Members continued. 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Katie Pappas commented on climate change crisis and how it affect the air quality in Salt Lake City. William Fisher and Johnny Vasic commented on the Inland Port, asked the Council and Mayor to not support the Port; presenting question to how the City could hold the developer and businesses accountable for environmental impact. Jenny Hewson and Samantha Finch spoke in favor of Kristin Riker as Director of the Public Lands Department. George Chapman commented on how environmental Salt Lake City was and improvements that could be made such as no idle zones for semi-trucks. H. NEW BUSINESS: i. Advice and Consent: Kristin Riker — Director of the Public Lands Department 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kristin Riker as the Director of the Public Lands Department. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the appointment of Kristin Riker as the Director of the Public Lands Department. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Motion: Meeting Remotely Without an Anchor Location The Council will consider a motion to ratify the Chair's determination to continue meeting remotely and without an anchor location due to the health and safety of the people who may be in attendance, and considering the continued closure of the City and County Building to the public. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano to ratify the Chair's determination to continue meeting remotely and without an anchor location. 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7— o Pass 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: i. Resolution: Funding Our Future: Addenda to Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement with Utah Transit Authority UTA The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into two proposed agreements (the fourth and fifth addenda to date) for the City's interlocal agreement (ILA) with UTA. The fourth addendum continues service on East-West connecting Routes 2 (200 South), 9 (goo South) and 21 (2100 South). The fifth addendum initiates mobilization on Route 1 (l000 North) which allows UTA to gather the resources needed, such as additional vehicles, to launch the new service. The ILA is a twenty-year agreement with a goal of full implementation of the Frequent Transit Network as described in the City's Transit Master Plan. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, July 20, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Resolution 29 of 2021, entering into Addendum Number 4, and Addendum Number 5 to the Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority and the remaining$175,261 be placed into a holding account reserved for future Funding Our Future transit expenses. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Resolution: Authorizing the Issuance and the Sale of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue and Refunding Bonds The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize up to $26,ioo,000 of sales and excise tax revenue refunding bonds, in one or more series and on a taxable or tax-exempt basis, to finance the acquisition of certain library facilities by refinancing certain lease revenue bonds and to refund certain 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 outstanding sales and excise tax revenue bonds; delegating authority to certain officials and officers to approve the final terms of such bonds; authorizing the holding of a public hearing and providing for related matters. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, July 13, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 26 of 2o2i,Authorizing up to $26,ioo,000 of sales and excise tax revenue and refunding bonds and providing for related matters. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 J. CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Amending City Code Pertaining to Fence, Wall, and Hedge Height Requirements The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning ordinance regulations to remove the Special Exception process that allows for over-height fences (Chapter 21A.52.030) and to define instances where a taller fence may be appropriate and approved by right (Chapter 21A.40.120). The proposed amendments would limit fence,wall, and hedge height to four feet (4') in front yards and six feet (6') in the side or rear yards for all zoning districts, except for a few specific instances. Those instances include when a residential district abuts a nonresidential district, manufacturing and extractive industries zoning districts, public facilities and recreation facilities where a greater height is necessary to protect public safety, private game courts, and construction fencing. Additionally,the Planning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission would have the authority to grant additional fence, wall, or hedge height as part of a land use application. The amendments proposed to Chapter 21A.40 will affect all zoning districts throughout the City. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00511 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, September 21, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Rezone at Nielsen Estates at 833 West Hoyt Place and 834 West Zoo North The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map pertaining to two parcels located at 833 West Hoyt Place and 834 West 20o North. The proposal would rezone the parcels from R-1/5,000 (Single- Family Residential District) and R-1/7,000 (Single- Family Residential District), respectively,to SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential District). The applicant would like to rezone the properties for a future Planned Development that would include the preservation of the existing home and add six new single- family attached homes with access coming either from Hoyt Place (private street), 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 or 20o North. However, the request is not tied to a specific development proposal at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2o18-00877 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, September 21, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3. Ordinance: Permitting Restaurants in the Public Lands Zoning District The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 P.M. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code to allow restaurant uses in the Public Lands District. The purpose of the Public Lands zone (section 21A.32.070) is to delineate areas of public use and control the potential redevelopment of public uses, lands, and facilities. If amended, restaurants would adhere to the same regulations as other permitted uses in the zone,which requires permitted and conditional uses to be located on lots with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 75 feet. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00503 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, September 21, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 4. Informational: Honorary Street Name "Pastor France Davis Way" The Council will set the date of Tuesday,August 24, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would add the honorary street name "Pastor France Davis Way" on the block of Harvard Avenue between State Street and Main Street, south of Calvary Baptist Church. This honorary street name would recognize Reverend France A. Davis, who served as the Pastor 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 of Calvary Missionary Baptist Church, a predominately African American congregation, for over forty years. Reverend Davis was and still is actively involved in community affairs, serving on numerous state and local boards, providing counsel to community leaders, and serving as a bridge builder to the various entities that make up the community. He is one of the Core Commission Members of the City's Commission on Racial Equity in Policing. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,August 24, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 24, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 5. Resolution: Authorizing the Issuance and the Sale of Sales and Excise Tax Revenue and Refunding Bonds The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7 P.M. to accept public comment about the issuance of the City's sales and excise tax revenue bonds to finance the acquisition of certain library facilities from the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City and the potential economic impact that such library facilities will have on the private sector. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, July 13, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, September 21, 2021 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 6. Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board — Scott Lyttle The Council will consider approving the appointment of Scott Lyttle to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 29, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City— Mike Pazzi The Council will consider approving the appointment of Mike Pazzi to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending August 17, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 8. Board Reappointment: Citizens' Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) - Jeff Worthington The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Jeff Worthington to the Citizens' Compensation Advisory Committee for a term extending through August 17, 2025. This is a Council-appointed position, therefore an Administrative Recommendation letter is not included. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 9. Board Reappointment: Citizens' Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) — Brandon Dew The Council will consider approving the reappointment of of Brandon Dew to the 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Citizens' Compensation Advisory Committee for a term extending through August 17, 2025. This is a Council-appointed position, therefore an Administrative Recommendation letter is not included. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 17, 2021 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Rogers, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt the consent agenda. AYE: Dennis Faris, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,James Rogers,Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton Final Result: 7- o Pass K. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:31 pm Local Building Authority Minutes Approved: Local Building Authority Chair City Council Minutes Approved: City Council Chair 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday,August 17, 2021 City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials, please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library, use the links on the right of your screen within the `Document Relationships' information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the Local Building Authority and City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday,August 17, 2021. 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 PENDING MINUTES - NOT APPROVED by LBA& RDA The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 3, 2022. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy, Victoria Petro-Eschler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis, City Attorney; Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder; Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst; Sylvia Richards, Public Policy Analyst; Thais Stewart,Minutes&Records Clerk; Taylor Hill, Council Staff, Michelle Barney,Minutes&Records Clerk; Ben Luedtke, Public Policy Analyst; and Isaac Canedo, Council Staff Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:ig pm. 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: Board/Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Council Member Dugan welcomed all in attendance, reviewed the rules of decorum and the role of City Council Members as members of the Local Building Authority and the Redevelopment Agency. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Minutes: PENDING APPROVAL B. LBA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Motion: Moved by Board Member Puy, seconded by Board Member Wharton to approve Resolution of of 2o22, adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass C. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and convene as the Redevelopment Agency. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. RDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Puy to adopt Resolution o5 of 2022, adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass Minutes: PENDING APPROVAL 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 E. RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adjourn as the Redevelopment Agency and convene as the City Council. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council Member Dugan welcomed everyone to the City Council meeting. 2. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 8, 2022; April 12, 2022; and April 19, 2022 as well as the formal meeting minutes of October 5, 2021; March 22, 2022; April 5, 2022; and April 12, 2022. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to approve the Work Session Meeting Minutes of February 8, 2022;April 12, 2o22 and April 19, 2022; as well as the Formal Meeting Minutes of October 5, 2o21; March 22, 2022;April 5, 2022; and April 12, 2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 3• Mayor Mendenhall will present the proposed Salt Lake City budget, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Minutes: Mayor Mendenhall presented the budget for Fiscal Year 2022-23, speaking to the growth for Salt Lake City,the budget responding to the needs and requests of Salt Lake residents while planning for the future,prioritizing growth that equitably benefited all City residents; making Salt Lake City more environmentally resilient and sustainable; bolstering communities with inclusive and equitable opportunities for all; and supporting City employees'physical, mental and economic well being; noted a property tax increase and bond proposals to assist with funding critical projects. Adam Janisieski(ASL Interpreter)joined Mayor Mendenhall. Council Member Dugan reviewed the next steps for the budget process and encouraged the public to attend meetings and make comments. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Grant Application: 2023 Distracted Driving Prevention Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant would fund distracted driving enforcement/education overtime shifts. The grant project period will be one year beginning October 1, 2022. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Minutes: No public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler, seconded by Council Member Mano to close the Public Hearing and refer Item G-i to a future Consent Agenda for action. 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at i95o S West Temple and 1948 S West Temple The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map for the properties at 1950 South West Temple and a portion of the property at 1948 South West Temple, changing them from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) to CG (General Commercial). This ordinance would also amend the Future Land Use Map in the Central Community Master Plan from "Medium Density Residential' to "Medium Residential/Mixed Use." The requests are part of an effort to expand the existing Intermountain Wood Products operation into a new office building with uniform zoning on their properties. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00291 & PLNPCM2021-00292 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Brian Fullmer gave a brief presentation of the rezone request. George Chapman spoke in opposition to the proposal; possible noise issues and traffic; increased height would be an issue next to a single family residental zone. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting; further move that the Council direct staff to work with the petitioner and City Attorney's Office to prepare an agreement for future consideration that would limit building height on the property to 35 feet. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Final Result: 7- o Pass 3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1902 South 400 East The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting and ordinance that would amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map for property located at 1902 South 400 East from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and the zoning map from R-1-5,000 (Residential)to RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District). The purpose of the rezone request is to facilitate the construction of townhomes. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00717&PLNPCM2021-00718 FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Brian Fullmer gave a brief presentation of the rezone request. Caitlyn Tubbs(Principal Planner) stated she was available for any questions. George Chapman spoke in opposition to the proposal;the development would drive up the cost of housing in the area and destroy the nature of the neighborhood. Jeff Bair reviewed the history of the property and spoke in opposition to the proposal as it would not be affordable and asked the Council to deny the petition. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the Public Hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 4. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.i for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes a budget for property tax revenues that are legally required to be passed through the Library to the Utah Inland Port and the County Convention Center Hotel, among other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Ben Luedtke gave a brief presentation on the Library Budget Amendment. No public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to continue the Public Hearing to a future Council meeting. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 5. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.7 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding repairs at The Leonardo caused by flooding, transferring the Housing Trust Fund to the Redevelopment Agency, rebuilding a pedestrian bridge over the Jordan River to Cottonwood Park, and cybersecurity improvements among other items. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 and Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 p.m. 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Ben Luedtke gave a brief presentation of the Budget Amendment. Maevlyn Stevens spoke in support of the proposal specifically to the Open Public Lands portion of the request and asked the Council to approve the budget amendment. George Chapman spoke in support of the mobile cameras and the need for additional light pole cameras in high crime areas; Granary Flood Plain money should be used for a park on the Fleet Block, and a police precinct on the east side of the City should be made a priority. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to Close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 20 of 2022 amending the FY 2021-22 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. A-1: Open Space Acquisition Public Lands ($700,000 from Parks Impact Fees) A-2: Cottonwood Park Bridge Rebuild ($195,000 from Public Lands Department Vacancy Savings) A-3: UDOT Pass-Through Funds— RAC Access Road ($1 million from UDOT) A-4: WITHDRAWN A-5: Road Cost Center Adjustments for Class C Funds (Rescope $611,749 from 1300 East Reconstruction to 900 South Reconstruction) A-6: Leonardo Flood Damage Repair($300,000 from Fund Balance) A-7: IMS Cyber Security Portfolio Expansion ($713,680 from Fund Balance) D-1:Youth & Family, Salt Lake County Central City Damages Payment ($37,892 from General Fund) D-2: WITHDRAWN D-3: UTA Sponsored Routes—Encumbrance Carryforward ($184,259 from General Fund) D-4: Wildland Deployment Reimbursements ($653,571 from General Fund) D-5: Fire Department—Other Reimbursements ($21,896 from General Fund) D-6: Remove Transfers for ARPA Funding ($1,508,000 from General Fund) D-7: 700 South Corridor Preservation Funds Reimbursement($611,500 from CIP Fund) D-8: Transfer to Sustainability($440,000 from General Fund) D-9: Public Utilities Revenue Bonds ($874,000—Sewer and $234,000—Water) D-10: Police Budget Reallocation for Workers Compensation ($199,500 from General Fund) D-11: Community Connection Center Supplies and Tenant Improvements ($482,809 from Police Department Vacancy Savings) D-12: Central Business Improvement Area (CBIA) ($500,000 Expense Budget from Misc. Special Services and $1,770,813 Revenue Budget) D-13: Mobile Surveillance Trailer Cameras ($383,160 from Police Department Vacancy Savings) D-14: Housing Trust Fund Transfer to RDA($2,800,000 from Housing Fund) E-1: State of Utah, Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, Granary District Flood Plain 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Mitigation ($2 million from CIP Fund and $2,238,000 from Miscellaneous Grants Fund) Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3 G-1: National Renewal Energy Lab (NREL), Solar Energy Innovation Network (SEIN) Round 3 Multi-Stakeholder Team ($166,979 from Miscellaneous Grants Fund) G-2: Utah State Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services, FY21 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program ($7,500 from Miscellaneous Grants Fund) G-3: Utah Department of Health —Bureau of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Grant, FY22 Per Capita Allocation (additional funding of$4,200 from Miscellaneous Grants Fund) 1-1: RAISE Grant Match Increase ($1.24 Million from Funding Our Future Revenues above Budget) 1-2: One-time Transfer for TBD Capital Investments ($10 Million from Fund Balance to CIP Holding Account) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass H. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Public Lands Twenty-Year Master Plan, Reima_gine Nature The Council will consider an ordinance that would adopt the City's Twenty-Year Public Lands Master Plan,Reimagine Nature. This is a Citywide long-range vision for creating a sustainable system of parks, natural lands, and urban forests, including special places like the Salt Lake City Cemetery and the Regional Athletic Complex. The scope, scale and form of implementation will be determined through development of individual projects and initiatives in coming years, beginning with more detailed Public Lands Department Five-Year Strategic Plans. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 5, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 5, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday,April 19, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Puy to defer action to a future date. 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 I. COMMENTS: 1. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Council Member Dugan reviewed the rules of decorum and the process for general comments. Keiko Jones, Fairpark Community Council member, spoke to the redistricting maps,the number of districts the Fairpark Community was included in and why having the multiple districts helped the community and surrounding neighborhoods,urged the Council to vote for the minimal changes map as presented. Lindsey Bateman spoke to the survey conducted regarding financial security she conducted for a class at the University of Utah, requested more information regarding financial stability be offered to the public. Kathrine Stewart spoke to providing more outdoor activities for the youth of Salt Lake City, asked for the former Raging Waters site to remain a water park and importance of keeping it an area for outdoor activities to provide options for youth to exercise. Josh Stewart spoke to the need to keep the water park available for the youth, spoke to the nature of the proposal for the site given during the Councils'work session,the need to get kids off their screens and outside to exercise, give the kids a place to go that was exciting and adventurous. George Chapman stated the Westside should have an outdoor swimming pool, City surveys had limited responses and the City needed to allow for more housing development on the Westside. Christopher Butler spoke against the proposed police budget,suggested the money be used for homelessness and helping those with mental illness. Written Comment submitted during the meeting via comment card: Robert Goodman: For the 22/23 budget, I support public health funds to be used to improve the safety of roadways, as the number of pedestrians deaths climb, and in my neighborhood which is considered to be very walkable. J. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Amendment to Rename the Housing and Neighborhood Development Division (HAND) as the Housing Stability Division The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amendment that would rename 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 the Housing and Neighborhood Development Division as the Housing Stability Division. The Directors of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) Department and Housing and Neighborhood Development Division (HAND)have decided to rename the Housing Stability Division to better reflect the mission of the division. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Petro-Eschler to adopt Ordinance 21 of 2o22, an amendment to rename the Housing and Neighborhood Development Division (HAND) as the Housing Stability Division. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Advice and Consent: Public Services Department Director — Jorge Chamorro The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jorge Chamorro as the Salt Lake City Public Services Department Director. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Puy to appoint Jorge Chamorro as the Director of Public Services. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Tentative Budget of Salt Lake City, including the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to approve Resolution ii of 2022, adopting the tentative budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Year 2021-22. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. This amendment includes $1.3 million from a state grant and rescoping $1.3 million of parks impact fees matching funds to create five new trailheads as part of the Foothills Trails System. The Council adopted most items in this amendment at previous public meetings. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, February 1, 2022; Tuesday, February 8, 2022; Tuesday, February 15, 2022; and March 22, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, February 1, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, February 15, 2022 and Tuesday March 1, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 1, 2022; Tuesday March 22, 2022; and Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 22 of 2022, amending the Fiscal Year 2021-22 final budget of Salt Lake City including the employment staffing document only for items as shown on the motion sheet. Items Adopted: Items E-4 and I-2 to be used only for planning, design, and community engagement for the five Foothill Trailhead E-4: State of Utah, Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity, Bonneville Shoreline Trail Grant($1.3 million) 1-2: Rescope$1.3 Million of Parks Impact Fees as Match to State Grant for Five New Foothills Trailheads (Budget Neutral) And approve the Department's additional requests as follows: a.Add a "no construction clause" to the planning, design, and community engagement for the five Foothill Trailheads until the FY22 conditional appropriation requirements are met. 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 • b.Approve the request to continue the pause on trail construction until Spring 2023. • c.Approve maintenance work to rehabilitate the trench above Terrace Hills. • d.Approve maintenance of the constructed trail network starting in Spring 2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 3. TENTATIVE - Ordinance: Amending Salt Lake City Code Pertaining to the Use of City Owned Motor Vehicles The Council will consider approving an ordinance that would amend sections 2.54.03o and 2.54.o6o of the Salt Lake City Code Pertaining to the Use of City Owned Motor Vehicles by employees. The changes include: revising personal use allowances, expanding the distance limit from 35 miles to 6o miles from city limits; location monitoring, reporting and enforceability; cleanups to align with state law; and allowances during emergency circumstances. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 and Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 23 of 2022, amending Salt Lake City Code Chapter 2.54 pertaining to the use of city-owned vehicles. City Recorder clarified for the public record, the version provided as approved as to form had minor grammatical/date errors that would be corrected prior to signature. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 4. Parameters Resolution: Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 The Council will adopt a parameters resolution that outlines holding a public hearing, establishing a protest period, and authorizing the issuance and sale of not 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 more than $360,000,00o aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bonds, series 2022, related to water, sewer, and storm water capital improvements. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Resolution 12 of 2022, for the series 2022 bond parameters, and recognize the date was set for a public hearing on the bond issuance for May 17, 2022. City Recorder confirmed the adoption of the resolution also included establishing the protest period. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass L. CONSENT: 1. Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 6) for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 6) for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The Administration indicates this item will not be replenished through a budget amendment. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 2. Parameters Resolution: Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 The Council will confirm the date of Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 P.M. to accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $360,000,00o aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bonds, series 2022, related to water, sewer, and storm water capital improvements. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Confirm Public Hearing date. 3. Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board — Pook Carson The Council will consider approving the appointment of Pook Carson to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 28, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4. Board Appointment: Cultural Core Finance Committee — Shaleane Gee The Council will consider approving the appointment of Shaleane Gee to the Cultural Core Finance Committee for a term ending May 3, 2026 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails (PNUT)Advisory Board — Frances Ngo The Council will consider approving the appointment of Frances Ngo to the PNUT Board for a term ending May 3, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails (PNUT)Advisory Board —Wisam Khudhair The Council will consider approving the appointment of Wisam Khudhair to the PNUT Board for a term ending May 3, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Puy to approve the Consent Agenda of May 3, 2022 except Item L6 (proposed appointment of PNUT board member Mr. Khudhair.) AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass M. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 8:35 pm. Council Minutes Approved: June 7, 2022 RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: City Council Chair Redevelopment Agency Chair Local Building Authority Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code§52-4- 203(2)(b)• To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake 22 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 3, 2022 City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the`Document Relationships'information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the LBA, RDA, and City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday,May 3, 2022. 23 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 PENDING MINUTES— NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday,May 17, 2022 in a hybrid meeting. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy, Victoria Petro-Eschler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Cindy Lou Trishman— City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson—Minutes and Records Clerk, Sam Owen— Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards— Public Policy Analyst,Thais Stewart— Deputy City Recorder,Taylor Hill— Council Staff, Mark Kittrell— Deputy City Attorney, Ben Luedtke —City Council Staff Council Member Dugan presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:13 pm. 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1. Board/Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Council/Board Member Dugan welcomed all in attendance to the formal meeting and detailed the meeting format. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: Cub Scout Troop 3034 led the Pledge of the Allegiance. 3. Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council/Board Member Dugan detailed the roles of the City Council, Local Building Authority, and Redevelopment Agency for the formal meeting. B. LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1. Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno provided a brief introduction to the resolution. Amy Leach was called on to speak but declined. Motion: Moved by Board Member Puy, seconded by Board Member Fowler to close the public hearing and refer to the public hearing on June 7, 2022. AYE: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass C. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Fowler, seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn the LBA meeting. 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy, Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI-Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. RDA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1. Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno provided a brief introduction to the resolution. Amy Leach was called on to speak but declined. George Chapman suggested the City apply for Federal funding for communities displaced by freeways due to the goo South off-ramp causing damage to the community, the Fleet Block should be made into a park along with saving the murals, and the RDA to use the EMT building for a library/police sub-station/police station to work with youth in the community. Motion: Moved by Board Member Fowler, seconded by Board Member Puy to close the public hearing and refer to the public hearing on June 7, 2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass E. RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Puy, seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn the RDA meeting. 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy, Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall celebrating Pride Month. Minutes: Council Member Puy read the resolution. The resolution was presented to the Utah Pride Center—Jessica Dummar (Co-CEO Operations&Administration) spoke on behalf of the Utah Pride Center and thanked the Council for their continued partnership. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Joint Ceremonial Resolution 14 of 2022, celebrating Pride Month. AYE: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 2. The Council will approve the formal meeting minutes of February 1, 2022 and April 19, 2022 as well as the limited formal meeting minutes of May 10, 2022. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to approve the formal meeting minutes of February 1, 2022 and April 19, 2022 as well as the limited formal meeting minutes of May 10, 2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items Gi-G4 will be heard as one public hearing 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 i. Grant Application: Rocky Mountain High Impact Drug Trafficking Area Grant— Salt Lake Narcotics Task Force The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. If awarded, this grant would continue to fund salary and benefits for three existing positions which support the Salt Lake Metro Narcotics Task Force for calendar year 2023. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2. Grant Application: School Age Quality Grant for YouthCity 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services Office of Child Care administering U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Child Care and Development Fund. If awarded, this grant would fund the YouthCity 2022-2023 afterschool programs at Central City, Fairmont Park, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center, and Unity Center. The grant will provide wages and benefits for twenty-four existing positions which support programming at the various YouthCity campuses. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 3. Grant Application: School Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Sites The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services Office of Child Care administering U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Child Care and Development Fund. If awarded, this grant would fund wages and benefits for eight existing positions at YouthCity sites, including Central City, Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center, Fairmont Park, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall and the Unity Center. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 4. Grant Application: 2022 Summer Food Service Program for YouthCity Sites The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah State Board of Education administering U.S. Department of Agriculture funding. If awarded, this grant would fund daily snacks to youth participating in the YouthCity Summer Program 2022 at Central City Recreation Center, Fairmont Park, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, and Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center/Unity Center campuses. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action- n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Minutes: Sylvia Richards provided a brief introduction and detailed the four grant items. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and refer items G-i through G-4 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 5. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.i for Fiscal Year 2021-22 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes a budget for property tax revenues that are legally required to be passed through the Library to the Utah Inland Port and the County Convention Center Hotel, among other changes. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 and Tuesday May, 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation- Refer to motion sheet(s). Minutes: Benjamin Luedtke provided a brief introduction to the budget amendment(BAM No. 1) for the Library. Katie Pappas spoke about citizen tax dollars and the frustration that came along with them(money designated for an item that was spent elsewhere) and hoped this year's property tax notices were more honest/accurate. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 25 of 2022: Library Budget Amendment No. i for Fiscal Year 2021-22 only for items as shown on the motion sheet.A-i: Request to increase the library budget for pass-through property tax increment related to the Inland Port and Convention Center Hotel($500,00 from pass-through Property Taxes). AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 6. Parameters Resolution: Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 The Council will hold a public hearing to accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $36o,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bonds, series 2022, related to water, sewer, and storm water capital improvements. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-May 3, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ordinances listed below (G7— G16) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23.All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May i77ch and June 7th public hearings. Minutes: Sam Owen provided a brief introduction to the resolution for Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2022. Amy Leach was called on to speak but declined. Jen Heninger was called on to speak but did not respond. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing on the Series 2022 bond issuance. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 7. Ordinance: Amending the Available Methods of Delivering Records Related to Business Licensing The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 5.02.08o and 5.02.110 of the Salt Lake City Code to amend the available methods of delivering records related to business licensing. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-TBD Staff Recommendation- Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 8. Ordinance:Addressing Certain Fees for the Use and Cleaning of the City's Recreational Facilities The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code to address certain fees for the use and cleaning of the City's recreational facilities. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action- TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 10. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake CitX, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 11. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing- TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 12. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022-23, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 13. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022-23, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 14. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022-23, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 15. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 16. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno provided an introduction to the proposed ordinances. Amy Leach was called on to speak but declined. George Chapman said he was opposed to increasing property taxes, water/sewer/garbage/storm fees, as well as the bond. He said child care should be encouraged(and not charged fees), Golf Fees and HIVE passes should reflect better discounts for seniors, and the City should discourage turning remaining public lands into housing and instead be kept for the use and benefit of the public(not sold or given to developers). Christopher Butler spoke regarding the police budget; detailed studies/statistics regarding reporting crimes,crimes resulting in arrest/conviction, inquired if the City had found alternatives to police, and encouraged the Council to research more options —rather than over fund the police. Casey O'Connor spoke in opposition to the increase in water fees,the City's diversity efforts, as well as the City recognizing Pride Month. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing for items G7 through G16 and refer to public hearing on June 7, 2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 H. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1950 S West Temple and 1948 S West Temple The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map for the properties at 1950 South West Temple and a portion of the property at 1948 South West Temple, changing them from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential)to CG (General Commercial). This ordnance would also amend the Future Land Use Map in the Central Community Master Plan from "Medium Density Residential" to "Medium Residential/Mixed Use." The requests are part of an effort to expand the existing Intermountain Wood Products operation into a new office building with uniform zoning on their properties. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00291 &PLNPCM2021-00292 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to adopt Ordinance 26 of 2022: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 195o S West Temple and 1948 S West Temple, subject to the following conditions: i.the property owner consolidates the subject parcels, and 2. the property owner executing and recording in the Office of the Salt Lake County Recorder a restrictive covenant that limits building height on the consolidated parcel to thirty-five feet. AYE: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- 0 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 2. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 19o2 South 400 East The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map for property located at 1902 South 40o East from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and the zoning map from R-1-5,000 (Residential) to RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential District). The purpose of the rezone request is to facilitate the construction of townhomes. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00717&PLNPCM2021-00718 FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 27 of 2022: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1902 South 40o East. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass Minutes: Council Member Mano said he wanted to clarify that the planned units were now at a maximum of five with a restriction of square footage which was different than the original proposal and continued to take steps toward affordable housing. 22 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 I. COMMENTS 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: Council Member Valdemoros thanked the Mayor for joining the Council for the kickoff lunch for the Living Traditions Festival and Council Member Dugan thanked the Mayor for accompanying the Council to visit the Ute Indian Reservation to meet with tribal leaders. 23 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Amy Leach was called on to speak but declined. Jared Johnson spoke regarding rampant traffic violations in the City and suggested closing off the underpass behind the Salt Palace due to safety concerns. Jeff Bair spoke of his frustration and disappointment with the Council's vote made for the rezone at 1902 South 40o East and said as approved the project was missing key elements of missing middle housing and said the property did not fit seamlessly into the existing neighborhood(too tall/out of scale). Roy Bloebaum spoke regarding concerns with the bonds before the Council(confusion regarding the bond process) and the issue of taxes and asked if City departments could decrease their budgets (increased budgets equaled increased taxes for residents). George Chapman said the westside of the City was underutilized and needed more affordable housing,he supported more funding for the police department, and spoke on the issue of avoiding racist descriptions of possible suspects (suggesting more focus on describing characteristics rather than race). Cindy Cromer spoke about time extensions granted for previously approved projects by the Planning Commission and Historic Landmarks Commission, and said she would provide the Council a list of stalled projects in the City. Michael Valentine spoke regarding his opportunity to speak earlier during the RDA meeting, detailed his possible legal options, and requested an independent body/office to review his complaints regarding the RDA and individually all Council Members. Holly Christmas expressed concern of the City losing green space; losing the ability to adjust with climate change,increased air pollution, etc. and suggested the City needed more density—smaller units with green space rather than concrete blocks. Herald Piescey spoke on the concern of climate change; asked if the City needed gasoline/natural gas,why there were fees on utilities, and presented ideas for addressing climate change for the City. Cal Nez spoke regarding his Navajo heritage and the fireworks show for the July 24, 2022 Native American Celebration in the Park, and urged the Council to allow for the fireworks and partnership to continue the event. Jared Harmer spoke regarding Herman Franks Dog Park and urged the Council to plant grass, and said regulation of the City's housing prices was needed and was in the hands of the Council. Olivia Harmer was called on to speak but declined. 24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 J. NEW BUSINESS• 1. Reconsideration of Resolution: Redistricting City Council District Boundaries The Council will reconsider adopting a resolution from the May 10 limited formal meeting that would change some City Council district boundaries based on the results of the 2020 Census. Redistricting occurs every decade to create substantially equal populations between the districts to ensure fairer representation. The reconsideration would correct the boundaries of Districts Three and Six to move a single property inadvertently placed in District Six into District Three. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,April 12, 2022 and Tuesday, May 3, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 5, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,April 19, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 10, 2022 and Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Wharton to reconsider action on May io relative to the resolution authorizing approval of the redistricting map. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Wharton to Motion to approve Resolution 9 of 2022 Redistricting City Council District Boundaries, designating the boundaries of the City Council Districts based on the 2020 Census results as shown on the attached map marked Exhibit A, which corrects the boundaries of Districts Three and Six to move a single property inadvertently placed in District Six into District Three. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 25 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Protecting Patient Privacy and Rights Near Healthcare Facilities The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would help protect the privacy and security of patients utilizing or visiting healthcare facilities in Salt Lake City. The proposed ordinance would set clearer guidelines for the proper place for, and the manner of, the exercise of free speech in the vicinity of patients and patient access points of all medical facilities. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 10, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 28 of 2022: Protecting Patient Privacy and Rights Near Healthcare Facilities. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass L. CONSENT: 26 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1. Board Appointment: Sugar House Park Authority Board of Trustees — Sarah Sherer The Council will consider approving the appointment of Sarah Sherer to the Sugar House Park Authority Board of Trustees for a term ending May 17, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 2. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails (PNUT)Advisory Board—Aaron Wiley The Council will consider approving the appointment of Aaron Wiley to the PNUT Board for a term ending May 3, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 3. Board Appointment: Arts Council — Cale Newhouse The Council will consider approving the appointment of Cale Newhouse to the Arts Council for a term ending May 17, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 27 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 4. Board Reappointment: Planning Commission -Amy Barry The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Amy Barry to the Planning Commission for a term ending May 17, 2026. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy, Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 28 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 17, 2022 M. ADJOURNMENT• Meeting adjourned at: 8:30 pm. Council Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: City Council Chair Redevelopment Agency Chair Local Building Authority Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b)• To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the`Document Relationships'information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday,May 17, 2022. 29 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 PENDING MINUTES - NOT APPROVED BY LBA & RDA The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in a hybrid Formal Session on Tuesday,June 7, 2022. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy, Victoria Petro-Eschler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director; Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall; Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katie Lewis - City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman- City Recorder,Thais Stewart- Deputy City Recorder,Taylor Hill-Council Staff,Michelle Barney-Minutes&Records Clerk Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 pm. 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: Board/Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Council/Board Member Fowler welcomed all in attendance. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 3- Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council/Board Member Fowler reviewed the meeting rules of decorum and the role of City Council Members as members of the Local Building Authority and the Redevelopment Agency. Minutes: B. LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Puy, seconded by Board Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass Minutes: Jennifer Bruno gave a short briefing on the proposal. No public comments. C. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Wharton, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and reconvene as the Redevelopment Agency. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. RDA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Director Dugan, seconded by Director Mano to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass Minutes: Jennifer Bruno gave a short briefing on the proposal. No public comments. 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 E. RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Director Wharton, seconded by Director Dugan to adjourn as the Redevelopment Agency and reconvene as the City Council. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI- Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F. OPENING CEREMONY: 1. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of September 14, 2021 as well as the formal meeting minutes of May 3, 2022. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the Work Session minutes from September 14, 2o2i and the Formal Meeting Minutes from May 3, 2022. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Ordinances listed below (Gi - Gio) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23. All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May i 7th and June nth public hearings. 1. Ordinance: Amending the Available Methods of Delivering Records Related to Business Licensing The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 5.02.o8o and 5.02.110 of the Salt Lake City Code to amend the available methods of delivering records related to business licensing. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Ordinance: Addressing Certain Fees for the Use and Cleaning of the City's Recreational Facilities The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code to address certain fees for the use and cleaning of the City's recreational facilities. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date- Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 5. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 6. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022-23,the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2022- 93 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022-23, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 8. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022-23, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -TBD 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 9. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 10. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 19, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday, May 17, 2022 and June 7, 2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Minutes: Jennifer Bruno gave a brief introduction to the proposal. * *Sarah Woolsey comments moved to the General Comment section.** En Canada encouraged the Council to move funding from areas that did not create revenue,such as golf,to areas that supported the needs of the citizens of the City, defund the police, separate the social workers working with the police to a new department of peace. Christopher Butler spoke in opposition to funding the police; need to move social workers out of the police department, should not be funding grant programs if the programs could not be funded after the grants were completed. Jim Webster spoke to the former use of a Mayor's Advisory Committee which reviewed the budget, Steiner Aquatic Center needed to be maintained, County services such as animal control were not effective, street repairs were not happening on the east bench where most of the City's tax dollars were being generated. William Boren reviewed the percentage of budget increases for the City's departments and expenses that were not necessary;people of the City were being taxed and over charged and the Council should look at cutting budgets and expenses (not overspending). George Chapman spoke to the need to discuss the completed draft budget,the tax increase was not necessary,the City was spending too much money,increasing fees for summer use of parks was not appropriate,he was against the library recruiting outside for a library director,the need for more police officers, CIP for traffic calming was necessary, and no need to reduce the solar panel program. Margaret Holloway spoke to the lack of care for trees and landscaping throughout the City; should add artwork or cement in these areas to reduce water usage,there was not enough water to support the additional trees being planted. Carlton Christensen thanked the Mayor for the proposal to update the roads in the cemetery,public infrastructure for the cemetery was necessary and the master plan was a step in the right direction. Jen Colby stated the good landlord program discount was unjustified and required re- evaluation,was un-supportive of the golf enterprise fund, suggested more money be added to safe/complete streets and creation of a department of peace. Ralph Becker spoke to the need for a park in the Northwest part of downtown and the options to fund and approve one. Ann Hanniball spoke in support of updates to the cemetery roads and the irrigation. 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Kasey O'Conner spoke in opposition to increased staffing and spending instead of taxing the residents of Salt Lake City. Cindy Cromer spoke to the need to protect the character of the City registered districts,building statuses had changed which now made them available to receive tax credits and asked the Council to support the funding for the registered districts surveys. Dave Iltis requested an increase to the budget for transportation planning,more needed to be done to keep pedestrians and bike users safe, sales tax increase was not necessary, RDA project area on State Street was not appropriate, and suggested increasing funding for road signage. MJ Powell spoke to the importance of the My Brother's Keeper program,thanked Mayor Mendenhall for including it in the budget and asked for the program duration be extended; diversify the police force with training and programs. Council Member Mano thanked everyone in attendance for being involved in the process. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass H. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Western Gardens Sso South 600 East The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of the property located at 550 South 600 East Street from CN (Neighborhood Commercial District) to FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood District). The parcel is currently occupied by the Western Gardens commercial center. This proposal would facilitate redevelopment of this parcel into a multifamily residential project. The zoning map amendment does not require an amendment to the Central Community Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00420 FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, March 22, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, March 22, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 5, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt the updated ordinance as drafted, Ordinance 29 of 2022 Zoning Map Amendment at Western Gardens 550 South 600 East. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7— o Pass Minutes: Council Member Mano reviewed what was included in the Zoning Map Amendment. I. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: There were no questions. 2. Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Council Member Fowler reiterated the rules of decorum. Silivei Niu asked if there were programs for small businesses in Glendale to help with the development of the City budget and said it was important for small communities to be part of the infrastructure of the city. En Canada asked the Council to review rent control for affordable housing; add more benches in the City,plant indigenous/drought tolerant plants and add more protected bike lanes. George Chapman stated new fees for Airbnb regulations,increase penalties for short term rentals,fire engines should not be sent to mental health calls, need to increase mental health workers,increase free bus fair times, Urban Forestry needed an audit and review, stop planting trees where they would not get watered, and asked what happened 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 to the symphony performances in Liberty Park. MJ Powell spoke to the need to address gun violence,increasing the gun buy back payouts and the age for gun purchasing, over policing was not effective. Dave ntis spoke to the need to improve the processes of the City and the Department of Transportation. Margaret Holloway stated the International Market was a great addition to the city; Glendale neighborhood deserved a maintained park. **Sarah Woolsey spoke to the Safe Side Street program in the Sugar House area, asked the Council to fund the program to promote safety in the neighborhood. Comment was given during the discussion on items Gi-Gio. J. NEW BUSINESS: NONE. K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Public Lands Twenty-Year Master Plan, Reimagine Nature The Council will consider an ordinance that would adopt the City's Twenty-Year Public Lands Master Plan,Reimagine Nature. This is a Citywide long-range vision for creating a sustainable system of parks, natural lands, and urban forests, including special places like the Salt Lake City Cemetery and the Regional Athletic Complex. The scope, scale and form of implementation will be determined through development of individual projects and initiatives in coming years, beginning with more detailed Public Lands Department Five-Year Strategic Plans. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,April 5, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,April 5, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,April 19, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Petro- Eschler to adopt Ordinance 30 of 2022, approving the Salt Lake City Reimagine Nature Master Plan, subject to a revision in the master plan that any reference to a partnership with a"friends group or 501(c)(3)to support 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 or maintain the City's parks and open space will include a requirement that the friends group was separate from the City, not managed by City employees, and had a contractual, transparent relationship with the City to support and maintain the City's park/open space that includes City processes for any budgeting, receiving of funding and contraction for the management or maintenance of these City assets." AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass 2. Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund to Buddies, Inc., 115o East 600 South The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $150,000 loan from the Economic Development Loan Fund for Buddies, Inc., at 115o East 600 South. The business would own and operate the concessions and rides at Liberty Park. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Thursday, June 2, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 31 of 2022, approving a$15o,000 loan for Buddies, Inc. from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass L. CONSENT: 1. Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, July 12, 2022 and Tuesday,August 9, 2022 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program,which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other city- owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same year. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday, July 12, 2022 and Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,August 16, 2022 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission — Lisia Satin The Council will consider approving the appointment of Lisia Satini to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission for a term ending December 30, 2024. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing -Tuesday,June 7, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 3. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City— Janis Bennion The Council will consider approving the appointment of Janis Bennion to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending June 7, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Briefing- Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date- n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 4. Board Appointment: Arts Council — Thomas Kessinger The Council will consider approving the appointment of Thomas Kessinger to the Arts Council for a term ending June 7, 2025. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Sugar House Park Authority Board of Trustees — Siavash Ghaffari The Council will consider approving the appointment of Siavash Ghaffari to the Sugar House Park Authority Board of Trustees for a term ending June 7, 2026. FYI — Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 6. Board Reappointment: Transportation Advisory Board — Daniel Mendoza The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Daniel Mendoza to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29, 2025. 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. 7. Board Reappointment: Transportation Advisory Board - Suzanne Stensaas The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Suzanne Stensaas to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29, 2025. FYI - Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment- n/a TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday, June 7, 2022 Staff Recommendation -Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the Consent Agenda except for item 3,board appointment of Janis Bennion. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result: 7- o Pass M. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 8:20 pm Council Minutes Approved: July 12, 2022 RDA Minutes Approved: 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 7, 2022 LBA Minutes Approved: City Council Chair Redevelopment Agency Chair Local Building Authority Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code§52-4- 203(2)(b) To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.slc.gov, selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink. If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the links on the right of your screen within the`Document Relationships'information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday,June 7, 2022. 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 PENDING MINUTES—NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority,Redevelopment Agency,and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday,June 14,2022 in a hybrid meeting. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer;Danny Walz,Redevelopment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis—City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman—City Recorder,DeeDee Robinson—Minutes and Records Clerk,Sylvia Richards—Public Policy Analyst,Thais Stewart—Deputy City Recorder,Taylor Hill—Council Staff Council Member Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at:7:00 pm. 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 A. LBA OPENING CEREMONY: i. Board/Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meeting. Minutes: Board/Council Member Fowler welcomed all in attendance and detailed the role of Council Members as members of the Local Building Authority and the Redevelopment Agency. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. Minutes: The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 3. Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. Minutes: Council Member Fowler read the rules for public meetings. B. LBA POTENTIAL ACTION: 1. Resolution:Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2022-2-23 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The LBA's Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-23 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor's Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI-Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April ig,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan,seconded by Board Member Puy to approve Resolution 2 of 2022 adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass C. LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Moved by Board Member Puy,seconded by Board Member Mano to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and reconvene as the Redevelopment Agency. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI-Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D. RDA POTENTIAL ACTION: 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 i. Resolution:Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI-Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Puy,seconded by Board Member Petro-Eschler to adopt Resolution 8 of 2022 approving the Fiscal Year 2023 RDA Budget reflected in the Key Changes spreadsheet with the clarifications shown on the motion sheet. RDA Capital Projects Holding Accounts-$8,023,449 in capital projects are approved which do not lapse to Fund Balance with the understanding that these will return to the Board when specific project/program proposals are available as follows: Funds Going into Holding Accounts: a. $250,000 from the Central Business District for Japantown b. $734,o6i from the Central Business District for property acquisition C. $421,805 from the Granary District for strategic intervention fund d. $31,o84 from North Temple for the io%set aside required in the interlocal agreement with the School District e. $284,753 from North Temple for Folsom Corridor f. $ioo,000 from Block 70 for Regent Street parking structure capital reserve 9. $95,310 from Northwest Quadrant for shared costs h. $2,104,947 from State Street for property acquisition i• $959,774 from 9-Line for property acquisition j• $931,835 from Program Income Fund for a commercial revitalization pilot program k. $1,599,88o from the Primary Housing Fund for property acquisition 1. $io,000 from the Secondary Housing Fund for an ADU pilot program in the 9-Line project area m. $5oo,000 from the NWQ Housing for the Westside Community Initiative n. $1,000,000 from the Housing Development Fund for affordable housing property acquisition AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan,seconded by Board Member Puy to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined in items A through D. 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 A. New Program Funding Allocations.It is the intent of the RDA Board in the current budget year,and in future budget years,to consolidate the budgeting and policy development steps for new programs so that funding is allocated after the Board has had the opportunity to get a full understanding of the proposal and to exercise their policy making discretion.It is further the intent of the Council to review by December 2022 all RDA accounts that contain balances to determine whether the appropriations still align with the goals of the Board. B. Equity,Inclusion,and Other Goals.It is the intent of the RDA Board to continue to collaborate with the Administration and prioritize equity and inclusion in the Board's policy,oversight,budget decisions and any RFP/RFQs or request for master developers.The Board requests options from the City Administration and RDA staff to maximize opportunities for meaningful involvement for a wide array of developers and professionals.Further,it is the intent of the Board to authorize funding for projects that support walkability, are built at a scale to encourage human interaction,and include architectural interest and variety. C. Early Information and Board Feedback.It is the intent of the RDA Board to ask the Administration to provide information as soon as practicable regarding any talks and negotiations with other parties on projects or developments sought,to request the Board's feedback,and if appropriate,the approval of the Board via a resolution. D. Updates from Legislative Sessions.It is the intent of the RDA Board,as the policy making body,to collaborate with the RDA staff and City Administration before,during,and after Legislative sessions on any concepts that may relate to Redevelopment Agency Legislation.Further,it is the Board's intent that after every Legislative session in which RDA laws are created,amended,or eliminated,the director brief the Board on those issues,as well as on any new tools that the Board could use to advance projects or infrastructure funding in RDA project areas. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass E. RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Board Member Wharton to adjourn as the RDA and reconvene as the City Council. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI-Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F. CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: i. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of April 5,2022;May 3,2022; and May 17,2022 as well as the formal meeting minutes of June 2,2022. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy,seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the work session meeting minutes of April 5,2022,May 3,2022 and May 17,2022 and the formal meeting minutes of June 2,2022. 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass 2. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June ig,2022 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. Minutes: Council Member Fowler read the resolution and thanked Representative Sandra Hollins,Betty Sawyer,and Cleopatra Balfour for representing the community,contributing to the resolution,and being pioneers in the efforts for justice and equality in the City, County,and Utah.She said they were not present but would be provided a copy of the resolution. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan,seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt joint ceremonial Resolution 15 Of 2022 recognizing June ig,2022 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass 3. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall establishing a new Ballpark Legacy lease with the Salt Lake Bees Professional Baseball Franchise. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt joint ceremonial Resolution 16 Of 2022 establishing a new Ballpark Legacy lease with the Sale Lake Bees Professional Baseball Franchise. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass Minutes: Council Member Mano read the resolution. The resolution was presented to Amanda Covington(CCAO,Larry H.Miller Company).Ms.Covington thanked the Council, Mayor,and the City for their commitment to enhancing the ballpark community,creating a thriving area, and continued partnership. 4. The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution declaring Salt Lake City's commitment to promoting equitable and inclusive language access. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan,seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt the joint ceremonial Resolution 17 of 2022 declaring Salt Lake City's commitment to promoting equitable and inclusive language access AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass Minutes: Council Member Wharton read the resolution. Council Member Fowler thanked the Mayor for placing a high importance on equity and inclusion in all of its forms throughout the City. 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items Gi—G4 will be heard as one public hearing i. Grant Application:2022 Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity(RAISE) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Transportation Division to the U.S. Department of Transportation.If awarded,the grant would fund consultant services for the planning and environmental review process and solutions for eight multi-modal east-west crossings of the I-15 and Union Pacific Railroad freight line corridors.The crossings include 60o North,200 South,400 South,Boo South,goo South/9-Line Trail,1300 South,1700 South,and 2100 South. FYI—Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-n/a 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,June 14,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-n/a Staff Recommendation-Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2. Grant Application:2022 Teen Afterschool Prevention Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth&Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services.If awarded,the grant would fund the salaries and benefits for two new FIE Community Program Manager positions.These positions are tasked with maintaining and improving program quality,recruitment,and retention at four YouthCity sites.Grant monies will also fund wages for eight existing Teen Specialists,two at each site. FYI—Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-n/a Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,June 14,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-n/a Staff Recommendation-Close and refer to future consent agenda. 3. Grant Application:2022 State Homeland Security Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to the Department of Homeland Security FEMA.If awarded,the grant would fund$1oo,000 to purchase first responder pods to store additional food and shelter supplies for emergency situations; $5,000 to purchase evacuation modeling software for planning and mitigation of emergency events that might require mass evacuations;and$1oo,000 to purchase tools allowing the City to continue working towards compliance with national communication standards. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-n/a Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,June 14,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-n/a Staff Recommendation-Close and refer to future consent agenda. 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 4. Grant Application:2022 Emergency Management Performance Grant(EMPG) The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to the Department Homeland Security,FEMA.If awarded,the grant would fund support for Emergency Management functions and programs. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-n/a Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,June 14,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-n/a Staff Recommendation-Close and refer to future consent agenda. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy,seconded by Council Member Wharton to close the public hearing and refer items Gi-G4 to a future consent agenda for action. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass Minutes: Sylvia Richards provided an introduction to the four grant items. There were no public comments. H. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: Ordinances listed below(Hi-Hio)are associated with the implementation of the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City,including the Library Fund,for the Fiscal Year(FY)2022-23. i. Ordinance:Amending the Available Methods of Delivering Records Related to Business Licensing The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 5.02.o8o and 5.02.110 of the Salt Lake City Code to amend the available methods of delivering records related to business licensing. FYI—Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 35 of 2022 amending Chapter 5.02,Salt Lake City Code,Available Methods of Delivering Records Related to Business Licensing. Adoption of this ordinance(a)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 2. Ordinance:Addressing Certain Fees for the Use and Cleaning of the City's Recreational Facilities The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code to address certain fees for the use and cleaning of the City's recreational facilities. FYI-Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April ig,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 36 of 2022 amending Chapter 15.16,Salt Lake City Code,Addressing Certain Fees for the Use and Cleaning of the City's Recreational Facilities. Adoption of this ordinance(b)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 3. Ordinance:Adopting the rate of tax levy,including the levy for the Library Fund,for Fiscal Year 2022-2-23 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy,including the levy for the Library Fund,upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI-Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April ig,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). 13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan,seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 34 of 2022 adopting the rate of the tax levy,including the levy for the Library Fund,upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. Motion 3 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass 4. Ordinance:Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy,seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 33 of 2022 approving the budget of the City Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. Motion 2 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass 5. Ordinance:Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 37 of 2022 amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule including a 6.2%increase to all fees paid into the General Fund and removing the meter obstruction fee. Adoption of this ordinance(c)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 6. Ordinance:Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement,for Fiscal Year 2022-23,the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81,representing eligible employees. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April ig,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). 15 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 40 of 2022 appropriating necessary funds to implement,for Fiscal Year 2023 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire Department. Adoption of this ordinance(d)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 7. Ordinance:Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement,for Fiscal Year 2022-23, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State,County,and Municipal Employees(AFSCME)Local 1004,representing eligible employees. FYI-Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). 16 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 38 of 2022 appropriating necessary funds to implement,for Fiscal Year 2023,the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State,County,and Municipal Employees Local 1004,representing eligible employees in City departments. Adoption of this ordinance(e)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass 8. Ordinance:Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement,for Fiscal Year 2022-23,the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding(MOU)between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association,representing eligible employees. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April ig,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). 17 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 39 of 2022 appropriating necessary funds to implement,for Fiscal Year 2023,the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association,representing eligible employees in the Police Department. Adoption of this ordinance(t)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass 9. Ordinance:Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2022-2-23 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI-Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). 18 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro-Eschler,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 41 of 2022 approving the Fiscal Year 2023 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation. Adoption of this ordinance(g)was included in Motion 6 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass io. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 City Budget,excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City,Utah,excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted,and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI-Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-TBD Set Public Hearing Date-Tuesday,April 19,2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-Tuesday,May 17,2022 and June 7,2022 at 7 P.M. TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Refer to motion sheet(s). 19 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano,seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 32 of 2022 approving Salt Lake City's Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget as outlined in the key changes spreadsheets and staffing document,excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the Library Fund. Motion i AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy,seconded by Council Member Petro-Eschler to approve$45,703,683 to be transferred into CIP,including APPROVING$14,043,194 in funding as shown on the motion sheet with the understanding that the placeholder for a first-year payment on a new sales tax revenue bond is not approved. Later this year the Council will consider CIP projects,the proposed GO Bond,and the proposed Sales Tax Revenue Bond. Category/Item Amount Debt Service Payments on Existing Bonds $ 5,� Ongoing Projects $ 14C Other Ongoing Commitments $ 3 Restoration of City Hall and Hand Held Radios $ 5,7C CDBD Infrastructure Projects $ 7' OTAL for Approval in FY2023 Budget $14,043 Motion 4 AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-o Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Valdemoros,seconded by Council Member Petro-Eschler to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,items A through S. Motion 5(A-S) A. Evaluating Efficiencies across Diversified Response Teams-It is the intent of the Council to periodically evaluate the diversified response teams across the City to determine whether there are opportunities to eliminate redundancies and/or gain new efficiencies. a. The following programs would be included as part of the"diversified response model": i. Fire Department-Community Health Access Team(CHAT),Medical Response Team(MRT) I Police Department-Social Worker Co-Responders,Civilian Response Team iii. CAN(in partnership with other entities in some cases)-Downtown Ambassadors(including expanded 20 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 areas),Homeless Engagement and Response Team(HEART),Code Enforcement iv. Public Lands-Park Rangers Program v. Public Services-Community Cleaning Program(CCP),Rapid Intervention Team(clarify whether this is sometimes referred to as the"Clean Team") vi. gii Department-partnership with Mobile Crisis Outreach Team(MCOT) b. The Council would like the Administration to provide information in six months and in one year so that the Council can evaluate these programs: i. Clarify roles of each team and how a call for service is routed from one team to another. I Track as much data as possible to determine which indicators are most important for future reviews. These would include data such as:number of calls for service;number of diversions from a police-only response;response times for teams;changes in police response times;volume of calls by time of day and day of the week;referrals to other agencies;and other outputs and outcomes. iii. Find ways to provide this data with the Council and the public in a coordinated way. iv. Inform the public and other levels of government as these programs are rolled out. B. Free Fare in Winter Months-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to build on the success of Free Fare February in 2022,seeking partners to provide funding again next winter and extending it for three months.The Council would fund the City portion of the cost through a future budget amendment. C. Expediting Traffic Calming Projects-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate the workflow among CAN and Public Services Divisions that delivers previously-funded traffic calming projects,identify any bottlenecks in the system,and return to the Council with suggestions for ways to address them. D. Sustainability Holding Account-It is the intent of the Council to allocate the following items in the Sustainability Department to a holding account pending further discussion with the Council.The Council supports these items,but policy guidance from the Council is needed,and extends to the overall role that the City's Sustainability Department should play in the community. a. $214,000 for EV Charging Stations, b. $300,000 for electrified transportation planning,and C. $125,000 food equity funding request. E. Importance of Plan Adoption-It is the intent of the Council that City departments and divisions rely only on plans that have been duly adopted by the legislative body as the basis or building blocks for additional City policy or budget guidance. F. Tenant Ombudsman-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to explore adding a tenant ombudsman in the Landlord/Tenant Program(also known as the Good Landlord Program)to serve the growing number of renters among City residents.The Council requests that the Administration return with a potential scope of work for one or more FTEs,keeping in mind services already provided by outside agencies to avoid duplication,and building on work done by the City's consumer financial protection analyst. G. Covenants Education in the Landlord/Tenant Program-It is the intent of the Council that the Administration include training for property owners on Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions(CCRs)in the City's Landlord/Tenant Program.This training should clarify the differences between enforceable CCRs and unconstitutional CCRs,including those which would discriminate against a federally recognized protected class.The Council also requests that implicit bias training be added to the program's education materials. H. Consolidated Fee Schedule Holistic Review-It is the intent of the Council to complete a holistic evaluation of the City's Consolidated Fee Schedule in conjunction with the Finance Department.This evaluation would include equity considerations and evaluate whether to increase,reduce,or in some cases eliminate,City fees. 1. Grants and Ongoing Programs-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate the extent to which new City programs have been created through grants whose costs have continued beyond the 21 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 life of the grant.The Council will use this information to inform a policy or system for evaluating when and whether it is appropriate for the City to create new programs with grants. J. Water Usage by the City-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate water usage by the City and make recommendations for water conservation.This includes evaluation of water savings opportunities for CIP projects. K. CAN/RDA/DED Role Clarity-It is the intent of the Council to further clarify the roles of Community and Neighborhoods,the Redevelopment Agency and the Department of Economic Development as they relate to housing and commercial development and assistance. L. Transition to Environmentally Sustainable Weed Control in Public Lands-It is the intent of the Council to request the Public Lands Department,including the Golf Division,transition to environmentally sustainable treatments for weeding and pest control in future years,acknowledging that this may require budget adjustments.This is consistent with an existing Sustainability Department policy. M. Youth and Family Program Streamlining-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate whether to consolidate all City youth and family programs into the Youth&Family Division.The purpose would be to increase efficiency and propose options for future budget discussions.Additionally,the Council would like the Administration to evaluate the City's role in youth and family programming in relation to other community organizations to identify efficiencies and reduce duplication,factoring in overall community demand for those services. N. Police Response and Governmental Immunity-It is the intent of the Council to re-engage the consultant hired for the in-depth evaluation of the Police Department in 202o and 2021(Matrix Consulting)to explore ways the City can be more specific about minimum performance expectations,particularly as it ties to the City's legal defense for employees.In addition,the Council could ask this consultant to evaluate whether and how other Cities have tied legal settlements to the specific department in which a claim originated.The purpose is to inform the content of safety and prevention programs,and to identify any unmet training needs. 0. Fire Department Costs-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate: a. options for recouping costs for calls at the University of Utah. b. the City's hazardous materials ordinance,and implementation of that ordinance,to assure that the City is reimbursed from private insurance payments to those responsible for an incident. c. continue evaluating options for electrified Fire vehicles. P. Boarded Building Fee-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration for a timeframe when the Council can consider an updated boarded-building fee,or request that the Attorney's Office provide a draft directly to the Council Office. Q. Open and Public Meetings Act(OPMA)-It is the intent of the Council to ask the Administration to ensure that any City loan or grant processes comply with the Open and Public Meetings Act(OPMA).The Council could request that the City Attorney's Office develop an ordinance more specifically codifying this understanding. R. Ordinance Governing Donations to the City-It is the intent of the Council that a new,more streamlined donation ordinance be developed by the City Attorney's Office for consideration by the Council in Fall,2022. The Council further requests that while this ordinance is being prepared,the Administration create a tracking sheet for any donations,and work across City departments on a consistent process to support continued transparency and documentation of donor intents. It is the Council's intent to rescind the current ordinance at the earliest opportunity,in order to avoid stifling opportunities for potential public/private partnerships. S. Rotating Outside Auditing of Each City Department-It is the intent of the City Council to re-establish its practice of conducting management and performance audits of City departments,divisions,and functions on a rotating basis in the coming years.These audits are in addition to the financial audit that the City Council oversees annually.The audits are intended to bring consultants in for an independent look at existing City 22 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 services to identify opportunities for improved efficiencies. In addition to a focus on identifying potential efficiencies,the Council intends to ask the auditors to identify or evaluate professional best practices, definitions of success for each program,metrics associated with key functions,and any duplication that exists with other City departments and/or other levels of government.The Council intends for the audits to inform evaluations of how City services are meeting residents'needs while being fiscally responsible with the taxpayer dollars. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7-0 Pass I. COMMENTS: 1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Minutes: Council Members Valdemoros,Mano,and Fowler thanked the Mayor for her collaboration with the Council throughout the City budget process. Council Member Puy thanked Council Staff for their work and assistance through his first budget season. 2. Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited to two minutes.) Minutes: Council Member Fowler reiterated the rules of decorum and rules for the general comment period. Jay Ingleby spoke in opposition to proposed train tracks running through his neighborhood,citing safety concerns(trains tipping/derailing,diesel fumes/poor air quality,etc.)and urged the Council to keep the community informed on such items. Cindy Cromer spoke regarding the lack of housing in the City and shared a story/example of a recent encounter with someone seeking housing. J. NEW BUSINESS: NONE K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. L. CONSENT: 1. Grant Holding Account Items(Batch No.i)for Fiscal Year 2022-23_ The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items(Batch No.1)for Fiscal Year 2022-23. FYI—Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-n/a Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 23 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Staff Recommendation-Approve. 2. Board Appointment:Business Advisory Board—Vinay Cardwell The Council will consider approving the appointment of Vinay Cardwell to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending Monday,December 28,2026. FYI—Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Approve. 3. Board Appointment:Board of Appeals and Examiners—Lawrence Suggars The Council will consider approving the appointment of Lawrence Suggars to the Board of Appeals and Examiners for a term ending June 14,2027. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Approve. 4. Board Appointment:Board of Appeals and Examiners—George Reid The Council will consider approving the appointment of George Reid to the Board of Appeals and Examiners for a term ending June 14,2027. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Set Public Hearing Date-n/a 24 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Board of Appeals and Examiners—Paul Hayward The Council will consider approving the appointment of Paul Hayward to the Board of Appeals and Examiners for a term ending June 14,2027. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Approve. 6. Board Appointment:Board of Appeals and Examiners—Tyson James Bell The Council will consider approving the appointment of Tyson James Bell to the Board of Appeals and Examiners for a term ending June 14,2027. FYI—Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Set Public Hearing Date-n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment-n/a TENTATIVE Council Action-Tuesday,June 14,2022 Staff Recommendation-Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton,seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt the Consent Agenda. AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,Alejandro Puy,Victoria Petro-Eschler Final Result:7—o Pass 25 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:58 pm. Council Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: City Council Chair Redevelopment Agency Chair Local Building Authority Chair City Recorder This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code§52-4-203(2)(b). To listen to the audio recording of the meeting or view meeting materials,please visit Salt Lake City Public Body Minutes library, available at www.data.sle.gov,selecting the Public Body Minutes hyperlink.If you are viewing this file in the Minutes library,use the 26 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 14, 2022 links on the right of your screen within the`Document Relationships'information to listen to the audio or view meeting materials. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council,Local Building Authority,and Redevelopment Agency Formal meeting held Tuesday,June 14,2022. 27 Item J1 MOTION SHEET LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY ,.. .:; TO: Board Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget&Policy Analyst DATE: May 2,2023 RE: MOTION SHEET-Resolution adopting Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority tentative budget for FY 2023-24 MOTION i—ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. MOTION 2 —NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY Item Ji 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Resolution No. of 2023 (Adopting the Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) A resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024. PREAMBLE WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council has created the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah (the "Building Authority"), and has appointed Mary Beth Thompson as the Budget Officer of the Building Authority(the "Budget Officer"); and WHEREAS, the Budget Officer has filed with the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Building Authority a tentative budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority; and WHEREAS, the Board is required to review, consider and tentatively adopt the tentative budget in a regular or special meeting called for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the tentative budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and data shall be a public record in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, available for public inspection at the Building Authority's principal place of business during regular business hours for a period of at least seven days before the adoption of the final budget and shall be published, at least seven days before the adoption of the final budget in a public meeting, (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website and(b) on the Building Authority's official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation; and WHEREAS, at the meeting in which the tentative budget for the capital projects fund is adopted, the Board shall establish the time and place of a public hearing to consider the adoption 1 and shall order that notice thereof be given at least seven days before the hearing (a)by publishing on the Utah Public Notice Website and (b)by publishing on the Building Authority's official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation. NOW, THEREFORE,be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The tentative budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority for the fiscal year 2023-2024, filed by the Budget Officer with the Board, is hereby adopted as the Building Authority's tentative budget for the capital projects fund, and is ordered to be filed and maintained as a public record, available for public inspection in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, whose office is located at 451 South State Street, Room 451, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, until adoption of the final budget. 2. The Board shall hold a public hearing on the budget tentatively adopted. The public hearing shall be held at 7:00 p.m. on , 2023 and , 2023, at the City Council Chambers, City & County Building, 451 South State Street, Room 315, Salt Lake City, Utah. Notice of the public hearing shall be given at least seven days before the hearing (a) by publishing on the Utah Public Notice Website and(b)by publishing on the Building Authority's official website or, if the Building Authority does not maintain an official website, on the official website of Salt Lake City Corporation.At the public hearing the Board shall give all interested persons in attendance or connected remotely an opportunity to be heard on the estimate of revenues and expenditures or any item in the tentative budget of the capital projects fund. 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its approval and adoption. 2 Passed by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. PRESIDENT ATTEST: SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM 5615( � Boy erguson, Senior City Attorney Date:4-28-2023 3 Item Ii „ MOTION SHEET ;� REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY i TO: RDA Board Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget&Policy Analyst DATE: May 2, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET—Resolution adopting Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City tentative budget for FY 2023-24 MOTION i—ADOPT I move that the Board approve a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City,Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. MOTION 2 —NOT ADOPT I move that the Board not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item. Item Ii CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM P.O.BOX 145476,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5476 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION NO (Adopting the Tentative Budget of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) A resolution of the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah adopting the tentative budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 77204/R-31-2016, the Board of Directors ("Board") of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City ("Agency") adopted a budget policy requiring the Agency, to the extent possible, to abide by all processes and procedures outlined in the Uniform Fiscal Procedures Act for Utah Cities ("Fiscal Procedures Act"); and WHEREAS, the Executive Director of the Agency has filed a tentative budget with the Board; and WHEREAS, under the Fiscal Procedures Act, the Board is required to review, consider, and tentatively adopt the tentative budget in a regular or special hearing called for that purpose; and WHEREAS, the tentative budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and data shall be a public record available for public inspection for a period of at least ten days before the adoption of the final budget. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City that the tentative budget for the Agency for the fiscal year 2023-2024 attached hereto is hereby adopted as the Agency's tentative budget and will be filed and maintained as a public record, available for public inspection at the Office of the City Recorder located in the City and County Building,451 South State Street,Room 415, Salt Lake City,Utah,until adoption of the final budget. Passed by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, this day of May, 2023. Alejandro Puy Chair Approved as to form: ,4M4WI-71P 4v'ka- Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Allison Parks The Executive Director: does not request reconsideration requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director Attest: City Recorder