The URL can be used to link to this page

08/15/2023 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORMAL MEETING August 15, 2023 Tuesday 6:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas. Council Work Room 451 South State Street, Room 326 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Darin Mano, Chair District 5 Victoria Petro, Vice Chair District 1 Alejandro Puy District 2 Chris Wharton District 3 Ana Valdemoros District 4 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7 Generated: 12:36:08 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Darin Mano will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of May 9, 2023; June 1, 2023; and June 6, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of April 18, 2023, and June 13, 2023. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Grant Application: Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Salt Lake City Police Department to the State of Utah – Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. If awarded, the grant would fund Police overtime, training, and computers. The grant project period will be 12 months beginning July 1, 2024. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Sight Distance Triangle Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the sight distance triangle. The proposal would amend the zoning ordinance regulations regarding the sight distance triangle, which is the area providing visual clearance at streets, alleys, and driveways intersections where views of approaching traffic should not be obstructed. Currently the code does not include intersections of alleys and streets, and alleys and sidewalks. The proposed amendment will add these intersections with alleys and add standards to apply the sight distance triangle regulations to buildings and all other structures not included in fence regulations. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects The Council will consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24CIP. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023; Tuesday, July 11, 2023; Tuesday, July 18, 2023; and Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 and Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund – Leavity LLC The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $100,000 loan for Leavity, LLC., at 47 South Orange Street, #B1, from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Leavity LLC., is a wholesale sourdough bread bakery. This loan will assist in the creation of one new job in the next year and the retention of one current job. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The proposed amendment includes additional funding for downtown open streets events this coming fall, local matching funds for Bipartisan Infrastructure Law grants to rebuild bridges over the Jordan River, and funding expanded elements of the 2100 South reconstruction project through the Sugar House Business District, among other items. For more information on this item visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 19, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 7 p.m to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance to amend the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 5, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 19, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board: Elizabeth Hanna The Council will consider approving the appointment of Elizabeth Hanna to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term ending September 7, 2026. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. H.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 2:00 p.m. on Friday, August 11, 2023, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, May 9, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Sam Owen – Public Policy Analyst, Katie Schnell – Special Project and Volunteer Program Manager, Bill Wyatt – Executive Director of Airports, Brian Butler – Director Airport Finance & Accounting, Lisa Hunt – Deputy Chief Financial Officer The meeting was called to order at 1:08 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 1 The Council will convene at 1:00 p.m. to enter into a Closed Session. At the conclusion of the Closed Session, they will hold the RDA meeting, beginning at approximately 1:30 or 2:00 p.m. Please note: the Council will return to the Work Session briefing items after the RDA meeting at approximately 3:30 or 4:00 p.m. Work Session Items Click Here for the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 4:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Council Member Fowler made a statement regarding her position on the Council and a recent incident resulting in an arrest. Andrew Johnston and Katie Schnell gave an update regarding the following Community Engagement Highlights: •Public Lands: Parks, Trails, and Open Space Bonds Phase 1 •Mayors Office Community Hours for May 2023 •Spring and Summer City Events •Homeless Resource Centers/Winter Overflow at 99.5% full •Upcoming Resource Fairs 2.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Administration’s Overview and Revenue Update ~ 4:15 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive a revenue update and an overview from the Administration of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 2 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson and Lisa Hunt provided information regarding the Mayor’s Fiscal Year 2023 – 2024 Budget: •Budget Decision Matrix Outline •Total Revenue from all Funds ◦FY 23 Adopted Budget Total ◾$1,589,733,704 ◦FY 24 Recommended Budget Total ◾$1,828,754,107 ◦Change from FY 2023 ◾$239,020,367 ◦Source of Funds ◾General Fund ◾Airport Enterprise Fund ◾Public Utilities Enterprise Funds ◾Other Enterprise Funds ◾Internal Service Fund ◾Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funds Andrew Johnston provided information regarding the Homeless Services Fiscal Year 2023 – 2024 Budget Proposal: •Homelessness Investments Mitigation 5-Year Strategic Plan •Community and Neighborhoods having two requests for Advantage Services and Ambassadors •Fire Department having one request for CHAT Team to double in size •Tracking camps within the City and how to collect data on active and/or cleaned unsheltered camps over the year Council Members requested to have the data analysis sent to the Council, on the return metrics of residents to unsheltered camps. 3.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Council Staff Overview ~ 5:00 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive an overview from Council Staff of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 3 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Jennifer Bruno provided information regarding the Council Staff Review of the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget: •High-Level budget takeaways with maintaining Fund Balance with one-time money vs. reoccurring funding •Structural deficit of SLC growing expenses •Funding the Future Revenue expenses of 2022-2024 •Decision matrix •Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Recommendations •Mayor’s CIP Recommendations •Proposed fee increases to Business License fees for residential rental units and hotel/motel units, meter bagging fee and lane closure fee •Community and Neighborhoods Budget request to add two civil enforcement positions to Community and Neighborhoods •Redevelopment Agency Council Member Mano Requested a data analysis regarding market value vs. assessed value in SLC neighborhoods. 4.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2023 for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport ~ 5:45 p.m. 20 min The Council will receive a briefing about a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2023, for the purpose of financing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Sam Owen, Bill Wyatt and Brian Butler provided the following information regarding the Salt Lake City Department of Airports, Revenue Bonds, Series 2023: •Reviewed timeline of Airport constriction planning to be completed in 2027 •Phase 4 completed, creating 94 active gates MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 4 •Finance schedule for 2023 bonds closing in August •Requesting to borrow $600 million in Airport bonds and plans to sell $450 million 5.Dinner Break ~ 6:05 p.m. 30 min FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a 6.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Metropolitan Water District ~ 6:35 p.m. 30 min The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed budget for the Metropolitan Water District for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Sam Owen introduced Annalee Munsey – General Manager Designee of Metropolitan Water District and Tom Godfrey – Chair of Metropolitan Water District, presented information regarding the Metropolitan Water District Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget: •Board of Trustees ◦Five Members from Salt Lake City ◦Two Members from Sandy City ◦Four Year Terms •Entities Serviced ◦Salt Lake City ◦Sandy City ◦Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District ◦Irrigators •Water Rights Projects/Supply ◦Provo River MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 5 ◾Deer Creek ◦Central Utah – Municipal & Industrial ◾Jordanelle Reservoir ◦Central Utah – Utah Lake System ◾Strawberry Reservoir ◾SLC Preferential Right ◦Little Cottonwood Creek ◾Salt Lake City and Sandy City Rights ◦Ontario Drain Tunnel ◾Sandy City Preferential Right ◦Bell Canyon ◾Sandy City Right •Water Sales Tax ◦3 % increase to member cities and non-member entities •Property Tax Increase for Water ◦Current SLC Rate ◾0.00021 ◦Proposed Rate ◾0.00035 ◦The District would see a loss of $11.7 million in property tax revenue ◦Goal to make up for revenue loss ◦Providing revenue fairness and stability •Fiscal Year 2024 Capital and Costs from Other Agencies ◦$9,371,370 total annual costs ◦$4,367,751 increase from Prior Year ◦$111.6 Million Long Term Financial Impact ◾Cottonwoods Connection Project ◾Deer Creek Dam Intake Project ◾Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley Water Treatment Plan Capital and O&M Costs ◾Central Utah Project OM&R Costs Council Members Puy and Petro asked for a review of what the ripple effect would be if both Sandy City and Salt Lake City were not in agreement for approval of the projects. 7.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 Follow Up ~ 7:05 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 6 For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 and Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Ben Luedtke and Mary Beth Thompson presented information for the follow-up discussion regarding Budget Amendment No. 6 for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 •Additional funding for natural gas costs/increases •Requesting funding for Rank Choice Voting outreach •Requesting change to seven funds •Budget requests and amendments Standing Items 8.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Council Member Mano made a statement regarding Council Member Fowler’s earlier statement. (See attachment for statement.) 9.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items. 10.Tentative Closed Session - - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 7 (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Closed Session(A) started at 1:10 pm, ending at 2:35 pm. Minutes and Recording not created pursuant to UCA 52-4-206(6)(b) Closed Session(B) started at 7:45 pm, ending at 8:35 pm. Minutes and Recording not created pursuant to UCA 52-4-206(6)(b) Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Dugan to enter into Closed Session(A) for the purposes of the discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual and attorney-client matters. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to exit Closed Session(A). AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Valdemoros, seconded by Council Member Petro to enter into Closed Session(B) for the purposes of the discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual and attorney-client matters. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano ABSTAIN: Alejandro Puy MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 8 ABSENT: Amy Fowler Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to exit Closed Session (B). AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 9 Meeting adjourned at 8:49 pm Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon Approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, May 9, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 9, 2023 10 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Thursday, June 1, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano The following Council Members were absent: Amy Fowler Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Lorena Riffo Jenson – Economic Development Director, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Jake Maxwell – Deputy Director Economic Development, Felica Baca – Arts Division Director, Jorge Chamorro – Director of Public Services, Chief Karl Lieb – Attendee, Natasha Thomas – Attendee The meeting was called to order at 1:05 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 1 Work Session Items Click Here for the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 1.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Fire Department ~ 1:00 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Fire Department budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Jennifer Bruno introduced Karl Lieb (Fire Chief) who presented the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Fire Department Budget and the following information: •14 fire stations around SLC •Community Health Access Team (CHAT) response ability •Medical Response Team (MRT) •Budget request for 5 full-time employees (FTE) – 4 social workers and 1 medical divisions captain Council Member Dugan asked Chief Leib to clarify the department's request for 5 FTE. Chief Lieb expressed that the added employees and social workers will aid in response time from CHAT and MRT. Chief Lieb stated social work intervention has proven to be an asses to the first responders and does not delay the MRT that is required to stay. Council Member Valdemoros expressed excitement for this pilot program and asked for clarification on the following; •How are they finding new full-time employees? ◦Natasha Thomas explained the department was in contact with newly graduated or graduating students in search of a career after graduation and that they will work during the day. •How is the department recruiting social workers for this role and could the City incentivize this program or create an apprenticeship? ◦Chief Lieb was in contact with universities and other entities to create an incentive program and or apprenticeships. Council Member Petro thanked the Fire Department for their clear and presentable metrics. Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Department of Economic ~ 1:45 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 2 2.Development 45 min The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed budget for the Department of Economic Development for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Silvia Richards introduced the proposed Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget for the Department of Economic Development. Lorena Riffo Jenson and Jake Maxwell presented the following information regarding the budget: •22 total staff members •Key Initiatives & Projects ◦Youth Career Pathways ◦Community Gardens ◦West Side Art ◦Twighlight Concert Series ◦Open Streets •Request of $80,000 •Strategic Plan to clearly define objectives, organizational structure, project and programs execution of SLC priorities Jake Maxwell discussed the Bio-Tech Career and Technical Education Program (CTE) success looking to expand the program within high schools. Jake Maxwell expressed that Youth Summit is a great way to introduce the arts children in the community an spark interest. Felicia Baca discussed the art assessment of areas for future art installations and the audit discrepancy from last year. The Art Council has put procedures in place to ensure the accuracy of the entries in future reports and are working directly with Mary Beth Thompson on these audit issues. Council Members discussed the following; •Using mitigation funds and construction funds and how these finds were used last year •How Salt Lake plans to offset the pains of local small businesses •Iconic west side art projects and special assessment areas. Council Member Puy requested reports for the following; •What was learned from last year's budget •The next steps in the projects MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 3 •How Salt Lake City measures success •What was the specific goal of the Economic Development Department •How the department ensures no further audit discrepancies occur Council Member Mano requested to flag the construction budget as a potential addition in the budget. Council Member Valdemoros requested a Tax Return report be included in the Economic Development Strategic Plan to show what the return would be if Salt Lake City invests a certain amount in a plan. Council Members thanked the department for their efforts to bring the community together. 3.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Office of the City Attorney ~ 2:30 p.m. 45 min The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Attorney’s Office budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Sylvia Richards introduced the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget for the City Attorney Office and the 3 other divisions overseen by the City Attorneys Department – City Recorders, Civil Practice (Prosecutors). Katie Lewis presented the following budget information: •Attorney’s Office represents every Salt Lake department and both branches of government •Leadership team of 4 division chiefs •Asking for office updates that are needed •2 new full time employees (FTE) for the department •Increased salary requests for FTE paid at market value will be supported by the City Attorney Sim Gill, Ralph Chamness, and Paul Fuller from the Prosecutors office presented information on the Prosecutors Budget requests: •Priority of Salary parity within the prosecution community and the market rate salary adjustment •Vacancy rate of 31% with 5 current open prosecutor positions •A request for a grant for the “Miami Model” Prosecutor position Council Member Petro and Ralph Chamness discussed why the report and numbers were MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 4 not submitted to the Salt Lake on time and what was done to the culture of the office to increase quality of life of the Prosecutors. 4.Tentative Break ~ 3:15 p.m. 20 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a 5.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Unresolved Issues Follow-up ~ 3:35 p.m. 60 min The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about unresolved issues relating to the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 25, 2023 and Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Jennifer Bruno, Lisa Shaffer and Andrew Johnston discussed the following information (for full report of unresolved issues refer to the Meeting Materials); •Redevelopment Agency funding and where that could be used in other projects in Salt Lake •Added construction budget increase of $300,00 •Proposed RV Complained Team for RVs parked longer than City code allows, •RV Compliance Team of 3 ongoing Full Time Employees (FTE) and 1 vehicle – ongoing cost $325,000 -one time cost $360,000 •Recourses for current unsheltered individuals •Sanctioned Camping possibilities, safety issues and other data needed to be gathered Jennifer Bruno discussed the following projects, the most flexible budget dollars and dormant HUD Funds being used: •Neighborhworks Partnerships •Citywide Additional Dwelling Units (ADU) •Switch Pointe Gap Financing •Sanctioned Camping Grant MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 5 •Naturally occurring affordable housing loan program Jorge Chamorro discussed the City reporting regarding size and locations of unsheltered camps and the core function of the FTE response team to ensure compliance with the 48-hour rule. Council Member Puy requested a proposal for Salt Lake to enforce rules, obtain resources and opportunities for those living in Recreational Vehicles (RVs) that the RV Compliance Team respond to, suggested black water vouchers and other possible ways to connect available recourses throughout Salt Lake and the State of Utah. Council will continue the discussion on sanctioned campgrounds/ camping at a future meeting. Straw poll Support for Neighborworks partnership, citywide ADU incentives, naturally occurring affordable housing loan program (funding our future) and RDA housing funding sources. all Council Members present were in favor. 6.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Governmental Immunity Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about the proposed Governmental Immunity budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24, which is the City's self-insurance fund for liability claims. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Item not held 7.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Human Resources Department Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about the proposed Human Resources Department budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 6 Written Briefing Only 8.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about an ordinance that would amend various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 1, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Written Briefing Only Standing Items 9.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. No Report 10.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items. Cindy Gust-Jensen discussed meeting schedules and the process to fill the District 7 vacancy. 11.Tentative Closed Session - - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 7 a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 8 Meeting adjourned at 4:33 pm Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon Approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Thursday, June 1, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Thursday, June 1, 2023 9 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, June 6, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Kira Luke – Communications & Policy Analyst , Aaron Bentley – Chief Information Officer, Sara Montoya – Senior City Attorney , Tracey Fletcher – Assistant to Council Executive Director, Nole Walkingshaw – Chief Innovation Officer, Marina Scott – City Treasurer, Chad Korb – Deputy Chief Information Officer - Operations, Tom Millar – Planning Manager, Rachel Molinari – Capital Improvement Program & Impact Fee Manager, Michael Atkinson – Capital Asset Planning Manager, Aaron Price – Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Hannah Barton – Community Liaison, Makaylah Respicio-Evans – Public Lands Planner, Roxana Orellana – Policy Advisor for Refugees & New Americans, Kristen Hansen – Know Your Neighbor Volunteer Coordinator, Zalmay Mallyar – Know Your Neighbor Resettlement Support The meeting was called to order at 1:34 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 1 Work Session Items Click Here for the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 1:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Andrew Johnston and Hannah Barton gave updates from the Administration on the following items: •Planning Department initiated projects •Public Utilities outreach for water reclamation facility •Public Lands Surveys ◦Glendale Regional Park construction starting this fall – ◦Laser Light Night Survey – ◦SLC Foothill Trailhead Improvement Surveys – 353 responses ◦Gateway Triangle Park Survey – 400 responses •June Events •Homeless Resource Centers at 99% full, at high capacity •Resource Fair to be held Friday, June 9, 2023 2.Informational: Equity Update ~ 1:15 p.m. 20 min. The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of Equity and Inclusion. These initiatives include, but are not limited to, improving racial equity and justice in policing. Discussion may also include updates on the City's other work to achieve equitable service delivery, decision-making, and community engagement through the Citywide Equity Plan, increased ADA resources, language access, and other topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 2 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Roxanne Orellana, Kristen Hansen and Zalmay Mallyar gave an update on Equity and Inclusion Initiatives with the following information; •Save the dates in June •World Refugee Day June 14, 2023 •World Refugee Day Festival June 16-17, 2023 •Catholic Community Services Forces to Flee Event June 20, 2023 •Mayor Office Event June 22, 2023 Council Members thanked the Office of Equity and Inclusion for their work with the community. 3.Resolution: Cannon Greens Community Garden at 1300 South and 800 West, Public Benefits Analysis and Authorizing the Lease Rate and Terms ~ 1:35 p.m. 10 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a resolution that would authorize below-market rent for lease of properties at 1300 South and 800 West for urban farming programs. The Public Lands Department is proposing authorization of leases to the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Wasatch Community Gardens (WCG) for eight City-owned parcels, totaling 2.41 acres. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Makaylah Respicio-Evans and Tom Millar presented the Public Benefits Analysis for Cannon Greens Community Garden; •Proposed uses for Wasatch Community Garden (WCG) for Green Team Job Training Program •Proposed lease terms •Lease with an option to renew could be reevaluated after five years •Public benefits for activation and improvement of vacant properties •The WCG site was identified in the 2022 Mayor’s Plan Council Members discussed the resolution and the lease terms. Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Capital Improvement Program ~ 1:45 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 3 4.Overview 30 min The Council will receive a briefing about the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other city-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - TBD TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Ben Luedtke introduced the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects and Timeline and provided the information regarding;(See attached Staff Report for full report) •11 million dollars going to debt service – 44% of the money available •Impact Fees •Council Member projects not recommended by Mayor •59 total number of applications for proposed projects Council Member Petro discussed inflation and higher costs for a project’s continuation. Rachel Molinari, Mike Atkinson and Aaron Price discussed the following information on the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Overview of the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget: •Capital Asset Planning (CAP) flowchart to determine where projects were at and how funding was distributed •Plan for a Dashboard for public view of projects, funding, ongoing expenditures and more in the near future •Projects recommended by the Mayor for Fiscal Year 2024 •Integrating Workday into current process Councill Member Mano requested a report on the percentage of funded internal applications versus constituent applications with any average or a trend. 5.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Information Management Services ~ 2:15 p.m. 40 min The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Information Management Services (IMS) budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The department provides technical support for the City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 4 Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Kira Luke introduced Aaron Bently, Nole Walkingshaw and Chad Korb who presented the following information on the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget for the Information Management Services (IMS): •Current Administration of nine full-time employees (FTEs), two part-time, and 16 apprentices •Requesting more FTEs for all departments within IMS due to Increased requests for consulting services •Software vendor costs increased due to inflation •Requested increase for cybersecurity improvements such as the SPAM filter •Improvements needed for City website to comply with State mandate to move public facing websites to .GOV Council Members discussed security and safety of moving websites to .GOV and the phases of the radio replacement program. Council Member Mano requested clarification on the Communications Engineer and Innovation Change Manager position. Lisa Shaffer spoke on the request for the Communications Engineer and Innovation Change position for the IMS team due to their service oriented purpose for the entire City and not just dedicated to one specific department. Council Member Puy requested more information on the free WiFi hotspots located around the City and where those could be found. 6.Previous Years’ Legislative Intents and Interim Study Items ~ 2:55 p.m. 20 min The Council will receive a briefing about the Administration’s progress on the Council’s legislative intent statements for Fiscal Year 2022-23, as well as legislative intents from previous years that have not yet been completed. Legislative intents are formal requests the Council makes of the Administration. This briefing will include updates on a variety of subjects, including the crossing guard program, funding for affordable housing, and more. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 5 Allison Rowland presented the following information on the status of previous legislative intents and the interim study: •Key budget issues and policies •Open, closed and complete status assessments for Departments Fiscal Year 2023 – See attached Staff Report for complete list ◦Attorney ◦Community and Neighborhoods ◦Finance ◦Fire ◦Police ◦Mayor’s Office ◦Public Lands ◦Public Services ◦Public Utilities ◦Redevelopment Agency (RDA) ◦Sustainability Council Members discussed the status of proposed and ongoing budget intents with Lisa Shaffer and Sylvia Richards as well as Council-added items. Allison Rowland stated the discussed changes would be reflected in the next report provided to the Council. 7.Tentative Break ~ 3:15 p.m. 20 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a 8.Resolution: General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space, Series 2023 ~ 3:35 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the first issuance of the General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space, Series 2023. Voters authorized $85 million for the bond in November 2022. The first issuance would be up to $25.5 million to fund several projects, three positions working on the bond projects, contingency funding, and public art. Some projects would be fully funded in the first issuance while others would have initial public engagement and planning. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 6 For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCbonds. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Marina Scott and Tom Millar presented the following information on the General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails and Open Space Series 2023: •First issuance of bonds from November 8, 2022, voted authorizations •Financing meeting scheduled for 2023 Bonds with a closing date of August 23, 2023 •Highlights from the Series 2023 Bond for interest rate not to exceed 6% •Funds coming from Bond Par amount of $24,855,000 •Estimated Debt Service Schedule •Need for extra funding for unforeseen roadblocks 9.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: Unresolved Issues Follow-up ~ 3:55 p.m. 120 min The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about unresolved issues relating to the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 25, 2023; Thursday, June 1, 2023; and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Jennifer Bruno and Ben Luedtke presented information regarding Unresolved Issues for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget: •See staff report and tracking spreadsheet of all unresolved issues as this was an ongoing and changing discussion Council Members discussed the following: •Funding Our Future and other items on the tracking sheet •Full-time employee (FTE) requests and where the biggest return of investment would be •Using remaining budget towards housing MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 7 •13% being the lowest percentage of City revenue the Council was comfortable staying at for required city functions •City events in the budget and the need to keep them funded for community involvement •Homeless sanctioned campgrounds, RV management and control and how to implement procedures and not triple tax residents •Proposal of sanctioned campground funding to be a one time grant and not ongoing budget money •Allocation of the Perpetual Housing Funds and involvement of the Board Council Members requested time to discuss and review the following: •Further discussion of sanctioned campgrounds when Council Member Wharton was present for the meeting •New information presented and discussed at today’s Council meeting Council Members listed the following priorities from the unresolved issues discussion: •Construction Mitigation Funding in Economic Development - Line item 57 •Blackwater Tank Voucher Program - Line item 49 •Additional Quick Action Traffic Calming - Line item 44 •Parent/Guardian/Faculty HIVE and Bus Passes - Line item 42 •RV enforcements and plans for relocation but would like more review - Line item 58 •LBA and Prosecutors Compensation - Line items 37 & 38 •Grant for Sanctioned Camp Grounds - Line item 58 •Train Crossing Safety Signs - Line item 43 •CIP request modified for Solar Panel Speed Signs in Rose Park Lane - Line item 51 10.Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget: 911 Department Written Briefing - The Council will receive a written briefing about the proposed 911 Department budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The Department provides both Police and Fire Dispatch services for the City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Written briefing only. No discussion was held. 11.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Melissa Greis ~ 5:55 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 8 5 min The Council will interview Melissa Greis prior to considering appointment to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 6, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Interview held. Council Member Mano said Melissa “Missy” Greis's name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. 12.Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission – Jennifer Mayer-Glenn ~ 6:00 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Jennifer Mayer-Glenn prior to considering appointment to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 31, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Interview held. Council Member Mano said Jennifer Mayer-Glenns’ name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. Standing Items 13.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Item not held 14.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 9 Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to: •Vacancy Timeline; and •Scheduling Items. Cindy Gust-Jenson gave the following announcements: •Vacancy effective date of July 3, 2023 •Proposed timeline for the filling of the District 7 seat opening •Approved advertisement for the open district seat before term concludes •Email list available for vacant seat updates, changes, or council requests •Proposed application period: Monday, June 26, 2023 - Monday, July 10, 2023 •Five-minute public meeting interview time on July 13, 2023, with possible round two of applicants •August 2, 2023 State deadline for filling vacant seat •Recorder’s Office handling elections and applications Council Members approved the proposed timeline to fill vacancy of District 7 and discussed proposed questions for applicants. Council Member Puy asked for a question to be added regarding English not being the applicant's first language. Council Member Mano requested the application and questions be made public as soon as possible. 15.Tentative Closed Session - - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 10 (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 11 Meeting adjourned at 6:24 pm Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon Approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, June 6, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, June 6, 2023 12 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, April 18, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative Leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Brian Fullmer – Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk The meeting was called to order at 7:04 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 1 LBA OPENING CEREMONY A.Board/Council Member Victoria Petro will conduct the formal meeting. B.Pledge of Allegiance. LBA CONSENT: Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will set the dates of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to approve LBA Consent Agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Councilmember Wharton, seconded by Councilmember Fowler to adjourn the Local Building Authority Meeting, and convene as the City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 2 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 7, 2023, and February 14, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of February 7, 2023. Council Member Puy took a moment of personal privilege to recognize the Die Hard Pickleballer Club and presented the club with a Certificate of Recognition for their community involvement. Motion: Moved by Councilmember Puy, seconded by Councilmember Wharton to approve Work Session minutes of February 7 and 14, 2023 and Formal minutes February 7, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.YouthCity Government will present the Youth State of the City Address. Diya Oommen, Hamda Ibrahim, Julia Summerfield, Rodrigo Fernandez- Esquivias, Cate Love presented the Youth State of the City Address to the Council. The YouthCity Government (YCG) thanked the council for their work with the group and spoke on the following topics regarding their impacts to the youth in the city: •SB16 Transgender Medical Treatment and Procedures Amendments •Women's Rights – overturn of Roe V Wade •Reproductive Rights •Transgender Youth Rights •YouthCity Government Helps and The Council thanked Angela Romero and Juanita Escareno for their work with the YCG. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items E1 – E12 will be heard as one public hearing 1. Grant Application: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from Housing Stability to the Department of Homeland Security. If awarded, the grant would fund seismic improvements on private single-family dwellings. The 2022 application includes duplexes and recruitment of homeowners who qualify as having low to moderate income. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 3 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 2. Grant Application: 2022 Public Art Challenge: Wake the Great Salt Lake Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Salt Lake City Arts Council to the Bloomberg Philanthropies. If awarded, the grant would fund A series of 3-5 major artworks across the City created by world-renowned artists. These artists will be selected with the intention of leveraging their notoriety and practice while bringing awareness of our water conservation, air quality, ecology of the lake, and environmental and social justice. A series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists and organizations in a multiplicity of disciplines will also be commissioned. The grant would also fund a part-time curator position and a part-time project coordinator. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 3. Grant Application: Consumer Recycling Education and Outreach Grant Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Waste and Recycling to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If awarded, the grant would fund four part-time Education Specialists to conduct reuse, reduce, and recycle presentations at community events, schools, and businesses; staff tabling events; monitor curbside recycling and green waste can contamination weekly on Westside routes; assist community recycling collection events; train Recycling Ambassadors; and support campaign outreach. It would also fund overtime for two Waste Recycling Equipment Operators to load and transport electronic (e-) waste collected at community MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 4 recycling events to a disposal facility. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 4. Grant Application: Marathon Community Investments Program Grant: YouthCity Teen Program Transportation Solutions The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth & Family Services to the Marathon Petroleum Foundation. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of one 14-passenger van for YouthCity Northwest Teen programs. The van would be used to transport YouthCity Northwest Teen participants from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the Northwest Community Center, which is the site for YouthCity Northwest Teen programming. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 5. Grant Application: First Responder Mental Health Services Grant: Wellness and Peer Support Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of three NeurOptimal and Neurofeedback systems for use in its Wellness and Peer Support Program. These systems are being used to improve symptoms of post- traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, anxiety, trauma, panic, depression, and more. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 5 discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 6. Grant Application: Leading City Procurement Reform Grant: Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Purchasing and Contract Management to the Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard. If awarded, the grant would fund training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 7. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Sorenson Unity Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sorenson Unity Center summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 6 See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 8. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 9. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Ottinger Hall The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Ottinger Hall summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 7 See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 10. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Liberty Park The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Liberty Park summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 11. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Fairmont Park The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Fairmont Park summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 8 See item E12 for minutes on public hearing items E1-E12. 12. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Central City The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Central City summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Sylvia Richards introduced the grant items E1 – E12 for City programs to the Council. Gale Daws expressed support for the YouthCity programming and the great impact on the community it would have to continue growing the programs. Bernie Hart urged the Council to have more oversight on the use of the grant money to ensure it was being used as directed. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and refer items B1-B12 to a future consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 13. Ordinance: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 (Form based districts). Additionally, the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures, while developing standards for public spaces. The Council may consider modifications MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 9 to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00529. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/downtownbuildingheights FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Brian Fullmer introduced the Ordinance regarding the Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment. Cindy Cromer urged the Council to review the amendment and expressed concern about the negative impacts the ordinance would have on the environment. Bernie Hart spoke on water issues. the new developments around SLC and asked the council to review impacts to the community. Doug Dansie expressed enthusiasm and concern for new growth, suggested additional criteria be included in the design for the Planning Commission to review the impacts of the height corridors. Jake Seastrand expressed concern on the congestion created in their neighborhoods by the new developments, suggested more city oversight on the new developments and their impact on local resident's everyday life. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 14. Ordinance: Rezone at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M- 1 (Light Manufacturing District) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use District). The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. No development plans have been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The properties are within Council District 2. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 10 Petitioner: Cameron Broadbent, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00587 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Brian Fullmer introduced the Ordinance of rezoning a Light Manufacturing District to a Residential/Mixed Use District. Cameron Broadbent (Property Owner) expressed desire for the rezoning request to be approved and stated their commitment to contributing to the community and creating a modest development. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and refer action to a future Council meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 15. Ordinance: Airport Title 16 Amendments The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would repeal and replace Title 16 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Airports. The proposed amendment would eliminate duplicate and outdated regulations. Changes also include moving codified commercial standards to standalone administrative documents for operators doing business at the airport. Language related to ground transportation rules and fees is removed where it’s duplicated on the City’s ordinance regulating business (Title 5). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 11 Brian Fullmer introduced the Airport Title 16 Amendments No public comment on this item. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and defer the item to a future Council meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would establish a process for approving future Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in the City and modify existing standards for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters. The Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. This petition was initiated by the City Council through Ordinance 15B of 2022. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01068 The proposal includes: •A Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.36.350 Standards for Homeless Resource Centers; •Provisions for temporary/seasonal homeless resource centers that incorporate recent changes to Utah Code; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.50 to include additional considerations when mapping the HRC overlay and other related changes; and •Updated defined terms. For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/HRCTextAmendment FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Council Member Dugan expressed desire for further discussion on this amendment and asked for specific clarification of the following initiative items: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 12 •Size of Homeless Resource Center (HRC) •the rules and processes each one must follow •Firearm procedures and process for the HRC •Reporting requirements for safety concerns •Combined city and state efforts for the HRC •Ensure the city was following the new legislation passed Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to defer the item to a future Council meeting for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2. Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Mano to approve Resolution 09 of 2023 adopting 2023-2024 Annual Action Plan funding allocations attached to the motion sheet as Exhibit A for CDBG, ESG, HOME and HOPWA. I further move that it is the intent of the Council to review the City’s various Community Land Trust and Shared Equity Programs (such as the Westside Community Initiative and Perpetual Housing Fund), and work with the Administration to evaluate how to deliver this service most efficiently. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 13 3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 865 South 500 East The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District), this would also amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The property is located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Rick Service, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00301 & PLNPCM2022-00302 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 and Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt an ordinance to rezone the property at approximately 865 South 500 East, and complete a Master Plan Amendment. AYE: Victoria Petro, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano NAY: Ana Valdemoros, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton Final Result: 3 – 4 Fail COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Council Member Petro thanked the administration for their quick action and response to the flooding to help the community. 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Roland Vick spoke on representation in the Federal Congress and the Utah Legislature and gave solutions regarding taxes. L. Maia Lavatai expressed interest in converting some of the tennis courts in their neighborhoods (Rose Park and Glendale) to pickleball courts. Lorin Schetselaar expressed concern on the involvement to keep the community safe, sidewalks clear and neighborhood regulations being followed. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 14 George G. Zinn reminded the Council to listen to their constituents and uphold the reputation of Salt Lake City. Luke Ulstad expressed gratitude for the parks and other program around Salt Lake City and expressed concern for the following: •Dust from construction •Lights burnt out at the Trax & Bus station, creating safety hazards •Air Pollution Carl Moore urged the Council to keep the program for the Og-Woi Garden and continue their work in the community. Larry Saggars thanked the Council for their work to mitigate the flood destruction and expressed frustrations with the City Council communications with their residents. Nigel Swabey expressed concern for the I-15 expansion and excitement for the new Major League Baseball Stadium coming to the City. Karina Villalba translated on behalf of neighbors stating their concerns for Rose Park residents and other needs in their neighborhood. Leslie Evans expressed the need and success of the Og-Woi Gardens and presented the each district with a tree to plant. Bernie Hart expressed his gratitude for the city council meeting, the dinner activity before the formal meeting, expressed thoughts on the homelessness issues and need for more attention to their community needs. Lionel Trepanier thanked the Council and spoke on the wonderful impacts on the community the Og-Wai Garden has had. Dan Pots expressed the need to promote wildlife preserve on the West Side to bring more wildlife into the area. Jann McConkie expressed the want for paper ballots, in person voting and no rank choice voting. George Shafer spoke on issues regarding the effects of actions having consequences and urged the city to look at those. Jeremy King expressed appreciation for the regional park proposal, would like to see a pickleball court included in the plans. Nateijie Hamilton spoke against the demolition order of the Og-Woi Gardens and urged the Council to save the Gardens. Dan Steenblik stated concerns about fallen branches on the Jordan river trail and the height of the riverbanks before the flooding gets worse. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 15 Jonathon Krausert expressed the need to plant more trees and grass in the city using less gravel and absentee landlord issues not fixing houses, keeping up yards and properties becoming dump sites. Billy Palmer urged the Council to find other transportation solutions that do not involve the I-15 or other freeway expansions. NEW BUSINESS: NONE. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Convention and Tourism Assessment Area The Council will consider adopting a resolution consenting to inclusion in Salt Lake County’s proposed Convention and Tourism Business Assessment Area (CTAA). The Salt Lake County Convention and Tourism Assessment Area (SLCo CTAA) is an assessment area proposed to provide specific benefits to payors, by funding district wide development & programming, and community and sales development with regional incentives programs for assessed lodging establishments. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Resolution 10 of 2023 consenting to inclusion in Salt Lake County’s proposed Convention and Tourism Assessment Area (CTAA). AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 16 CONSENT: 1. Ordinances relating to Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, including the budget for the Library Fund The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment regarding an ordinance adopting the final budget and the employment staffing document for Salt Lake City, Utah and related ordinances for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 17 3. Ordinance: Early Notification Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would approve various changes to the Salt Lake City Code relating to early notification of the public and recognized community organizations for land use projects. The Council initiated this petition to clarify early notification regulations and public outreach. The purpose of the proposed changes is to increase awareness and participation by the public for various types of City projects while still providing a timely review process for applicants. Related provisions of the City Code may also be amended as part of this petition. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, September 15, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, October 6, 2020; Tuesday, October 20, 2020; Tuesday, December 7, 2021; and Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Board Reappointment: Sister Cities Board – M. Nicole Pessetto The Council will consider approving the reappointment of M. Nicole Pessetto to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 2, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 18 ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 19 Meeting adjourned at 8:46 pm Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon Approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, April 18, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 20 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Redevelopment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 13, 2023. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer, Danny Walz – Redevelopment Agency Director Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Sam Owen – Public Policy Analyst Council Member Wharton presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:03 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 1 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.LBA POTENTIAL ACTION: 1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Resolution 2 of 2023 the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 2 Loca Building Authority of Salt Lake City for the Fiscal Year 2023-24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to adjourn. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.RDA POTENTIAL ACTION: 1.Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 12 of 2023 approving the Fiscal Year 2024 RDA Budget reflected in the attached Key Changes spreadsheet. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass E.RDA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to adjourn. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 4 Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of January 3, 2023; February 21, 2023; March 7, 2023; March 14, 2023; March 21, 2023; April 11, 2023, and April 18, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 7, 2023; March 21, 2023, and April 11, 2023. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to approve the work session meeting minutes of January 3, 2023; February 21, 2023; March 7, 2023; March 14, 2023; March 21, 2023; April 11, 2023, and April 18, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 7, 2023; March 14, 2023; March 21, 2023, and April 11, 2023. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2023 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. Council Member Wharton read the resolution and thanked Betty Sawyer (Executive Director, Project Success Coalition & President, Ogden NAACP) and Representative Sandra Hollins for their attendance. Betty Sawyer spoke on the importance of the resolution, expressed appreciation for the City’s collaboration over the years, and thanked the Council for their commitment to the effort. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 18 of 2023 Joint Ceremonial Resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2023 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 6 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2023 for Financing the Construction of the New SLC International Airport The Council will accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2023, for the purpose of financing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCAirports. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 9, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 and Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Sam Owen provided a brief introduction to the resolution. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Salt Lake School District Signs The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of Section 21A.46.052 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to pole signs on school properties. Public and private schools are located in various zoning districts around the City, and not all of the zoning districts permit freestanding pole signs. The signs are used to educate the community about activities at the school. Petitioner: Paul Schulte representing the Salt Lake City School District, Petition No.: PLNPCM2021-00190 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 7 Briefing - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Council Member Fowler took a moment of personal privilege to note it was her last Council meeting, expressed gratitude to be a voting party to six budget years as a Council Member, spoke on the many programs that were important for the City to recognize/fund, and thanked fellow Council Members, Council Staff, Mayor, constituents of the City and many others. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 26 of 2023 Salt Lake School District Signs. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2. Resolution: Cannon Greens Community Garden at 1300 South and 800 West, Public Benefits Analysis and Authorizing the Lease Rate and Terms The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize below- market rent for lease of properties at 1300 South and 800 West for urban farming programs. The Public Lands Department is proposing authorization of leases to the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and Wasatch Community Gardens (WCG) for eight City-owned parcels, totaling 2.41 acres. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 19 of 2023 authorizing below market rent for lease of properties located at 1300 South and 800 West for urban farming programs. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 8 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3. Ordinance: New Five-Year Housing Plan, Housing SLC The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would adopt the proposed new five-year housing plan, Housing SLC. The City’s current housing plan, Growing SLC, expires at the end of the fiscal year, and a new moderate income housing plan is needed to meet State code requirements and receive priority consideration for State funding resources. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCHousingProposals. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 25, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 23, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ordinances listed below (H4– H17) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24. Council Member Petro clarified for the record this was a State required plan for housing that specifically addressed what the City was doing for moderate housing, the specificity of the income level was intentional and conformed with State guidance. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 27 of 2023 New Five-Year Housing Plan, Housing SLC. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 4. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 9 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 28 of 2023 Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 29 of 2023 approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget as outlined in the attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the Library Fund, including the contingent appropriations as listed on the motion sheet under Motion #2, items A through D. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 10 6. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 30 of 2023 setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2023-24 as listed on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax Commission. A tax of .003599 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which: A. .002456 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $100,530,046 of ongoing revenue; and B. .000037 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $1,498,935 of one-time revenue; and C. .000580 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $24,916,220 of ongoing revenue; and D. .000424 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,342,055 of ongoing revenue; and E. .000007 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $293,207 of one-time revenue; and F. .000095 shall be credited as revenue in the special Governmental Immunity Fund for tort liability, generating $3,888,581 of ongoing revenue. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt $39,759,267 to be transferred into CIP, including approving $11,701,526 in funding as shown on the motion sheet. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 11 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Valdemoros, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5, items A through I. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 7. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 8. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 12 9. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2023- 24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 10. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees pursuant to the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011, which shall become effective on proper ratification and signature. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 11. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 13 of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 12. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police Association for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2023-24, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 13. Ordinance: Accessible Parking Space Violation The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code to adjust penalties for accessible parking space violations to better correspond with similar penalties described in the State of Utah MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 14 Uniform Fine Schedule. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 14. Ordinance: Board Member Employee Status The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would clarify status of members appointed to Salt Lake City Boards and Commissions who receive compensation for their service. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 15. Ordinance: Past Due Accounts Receivable Fees The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to past due accounts receivable fees and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 15 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 16. Ordinance: Removal/Bagging of Parking Meters The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to removal of parking meters and incorporating references to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 17. Resolution: Public Safety Compensation Philosophy The Council will consider adopting a resolution identifying aspirational goals that public safety employees in the Fire Department and Police Department have compensation at or near the top of the local market. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt ordinances A through J as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 16 I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. Council Members thanked and noted appreciation for the Mayor/Administration and Council Staff for a well thought out/balanced budget and for all the hard work directed to this years budget adoption. 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Zakayrde Zufelt, Paige Huff, Jessica Lyman, Daniel Taylor, Wendy Garvin, Amanda DeBoard, Jessica Sweeten, Charlotte Brimhall, Jeanette Padilla, Dave John, Miranda Twitchell, Jonni (no last name), Kseniya Kniazeva, Destiny Newlin, Gucci Stacks, AJ Lonewolf, Roselynn Ellis, Brad Sahleen, and James Faircloth spoke in favor of proposed funding for sanctioned campgrounds. Comments included: more trash facilities and public utilities were needed in the downtown area so that public waste was not an issue for the homeless, abatements have been a constant issue, shelter bed availability was in constant demand, a safe place was needed to store personal items while away for jobs, interviews, etc., requesting the Council partner with Unsheltered Utah for a sanctioned campground, appreciation for the effort placed into prioritizing the safety and accessibility of resources to the City's homeless population, sanctioned campgrounds could allow for a greater co-op efficiency and receive resources from various entities, having a safe/secure home base would provide greater security and state of mind, it was a kindness to people to offer a safe place to be, funding efforts being a great start – but not enough, thankful for a Council who was innovative and took chances, and sanctioned campgrounds were an offer of hope that brought ambition. Jeneanne Lock praised the employees of the Rose Park Library, expressed gratitude for the approved Library budget, and asked the City to continue supporting City Libraries. Jay Larsen spoke of an ordinance passed in Spokane, Washington he supported regarding being a nuclear free City and encouraged the Council to pass a similar ordinance for Salt Lake City. Matt Lehnardt spoke regarding tiny home villages and detailed possible successes and benefits to the community as more of a permanent solution to homelessness. Kem Elbrader spoke regarding planned traffic calming measures near 1300 South/2100 East intersection and thanked the Council for the proposed projects and noted there was overwhelming support for the efforts in the neighborhood. Alison Elbrader spoke regarding planned traffic calming for 1300 South, the importance of traffic calming in this neighborhood and City-wide, and cited a recent dangerous vehicle vs. pedestrian experience involving her family. Council Member Puy took a moment of personal privilege and spoke regarding the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 17 Council’s action regarding catalytic funding being held for sanctioned camping/RV parking, his positive experiences visiting successful sanctioned campgrounds, and that this effort was the responsibility of many entities, not just the City. Council Member Wharton took a moment of personal privilege to encourage those supporting efforts for sanctioned camping/helping the unsheltered to reach out to other City Councils/government agencies to assist in similar efforts. Council Member Valdemoros took a moment of personal privilege to thank the Nomad Alliance and other similar groups supporting the sanctioned camping proposals and for all the work done on their part for the effort. Council Member Mano thanked those who attended the meeting and shared their experiences today. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space, Series 2023 The Council will consider adopting a resolution authorizing up to $25,500,000 Federally Taxable General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space; delegating authority to certain officials and officers of the City; and providing for related matters. Voters authorized $85 million for the bonds in November 2022. This would be the first issuance to fund several projects, three positions working on the bond projects, contingency funding, and public art. Some projects would be fully funded in the first issuance while others would have initial public engagement and planning. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCbonds. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Resolution 17 of 2023 authorizing up to $25.5 million of the City’s Federally taxable General Obligation Bonds for Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 18 AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund – Salt Lake Sandwich Company, LLC The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $100,000 loan for Salt Lake Sandwich Company, Inc., at 1408 West Arapahoe Ave. from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Salt Lake Sandwich Company is a Poplar Grove based breakfast focused food truck. This loan will assist in the creation of 3.5 new jobs in the next year. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Monday, June 12, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 39 of 2023 approving a $100,000 loan for Salt Lake Sandwich Company, LLC, from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinances: Rezone and Zoning Text Amendment at 754 South State Street The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at approximately 754 South State Street from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The purpose of the proposed amendment is to allow for the redevelopment of the property with an urban hospital. The Council will also consider an ordinance that would amend the text of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code to add Hospitals (including accessory lodging facility), and Ambulance Services (indoor & outdoor) as Conditional Uses in the D-1 Central Business District. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petitioner: Kirton McConkie, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01109 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 19 discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2.Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 1782 South 1600 East The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map and the Zoning Map for 1782 S 1600 E. The amendments are sought for the purpose of eventually legalizing the property in order to construct a single- family dwelling. The applicant is seeking to rezone the property from R-1/7000 (Single- Family Residential) to SR-3 (Special Development Residential). The applicant is also seeking to amend the Sugar House Future Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. No development plans have been submitted at this time. The properties are within Council District 7. Petitioner: Blaine Properties LLC, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01138 & PLNPCM2022-01139 The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation, therefore an ordinance has not been drafted. If the Council decides to approve the zone amendment, an ordinance would be drafted and considered for approval. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 8, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, July 18, 2023 and Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 20 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 and Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by CouncilMember Puy to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 21 Meeting adjourned at 8:43 pm. Council Minutes Approved: RDA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ Redevelopment Agency Chair Alejandro Puy _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, RDA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 13, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 13, 2023 22 Item B1 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:August 15, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Item B-1 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: Aug. 15, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATION FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 8/15/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.No None.State of Utah – ICAC Task Force (Internet Crimes Against Children) The Task Force supports investigations of internet crimes against children including following up on tips on Salt Lake City cases for children under the age of 10. The funding would support police overtime and equipment used in the investigations. Needs Public Hearing Yes, as long as the City contin- ues to partici- pate in the task force. $38,290 State of Utah Police Department Council staff asked the Administration the following questions. The Administration’s response is in blue. 2024 ICAC Grant – Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force a. What’s the purpose of the grant and task force? The Task forces supports investigations regarding internet crimes against children following up on cybertips that come in on salt lake city cases regarding children under the age of 10. The grant would support overtime and equipment used in the investigations. b.The box for new fte’s is checked but doesn’t list the number of new or existing fte’s. The box was checked inadvertently. There are no new fte's for this grant but there is overtime funding. c.Is the grant renewable? The grant is available with continued participation in the task force. d.Is the task force new or existing? The task force is a state task force that is existing. e.What are the measurements for success for this grant? Successful case convictions and the ability to assist the State in investigations and prosecutions. f.Please clarify whether the grant period would begin July 1 of 2023 or 2024 (both are listed in the memo)? The grant period begins on July 1, 2024. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Cindy Lou Trishman CC: Justin Anderson, Sarah Behrens, Mike Brown, Jennifer Covino, Amy Dorsey, Elizabeth Gerhart, Taylor Hill, Sandee Moore, Jaysen Oldroyd, Laura Nygaard, Recorder Routing; Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver FROM: Shellie Dietrich DATE: June 6, 2023 SUBJECT: 2024 ICAC Grant FUNDING AGENCY: State of Utah – ICAC Task Force GRANT PROGRAM: Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force REQUESTED AMOUNT: $38,290 DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Salt Lake City Corporation – Police Department COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A SPECIFICS:  Equipment/Supplies  Technical Assistance (Training)  Provides _____ FTE Position  Existing  New  Overtime  Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: See grant details below.  Match Required: _____________________  In-Kind and/or  Cash GRANT DETAILS: The Salt Lake City Police Department is requesting $38,290 to fund the following: If awarded the grant project period will be 12 months beginning July 1, 2024. Overtime: $26,400 Training: $2,490 Forensics Computers: $9,400 If awarded the grant project period will be 12 months beginning July 1, 2023. Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:August 15, 2023 RE: Sight Distance Triangle Text Amendment PLNPCM2023-00054 MOTION 1 (adopt) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:August 15, 2023 RE: Sight Distance Triangle Text Amendment PLNPCM2023-00054 BRIEFING UPDATE One person spoke at the August 8, 2023 public hearing and was supportive of the proposal. She suggested the Council consider additional public outreach so people have a better understanding of the ordinance. The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council meeting. The following information was provided for previous Council meetings. It is included again for background purposes. BRIEFING UPDATE At the July 18, 2023 briefing Council Members expressed general support for the proposed text amendment. A question was raised about whether the sight distance triangle requirements could be limited to heights between 30 inches and 10 feet to allow for trees in the triangle area, provided they are trimmed below 10 feet. Another suggestion was to permit mirrors, lights, or alarms where buildings meet sidewalks to alert pedestrians of oncoming vehicles rather than requiring chamfers on building corners. Planning staff followed up with proposed language that would allow alternative design solutions to provide similar visual clearance and mitigate safety concerns. A legislative draft of the ordinance is attached that includes the following proposed change as well as additional minor suggested changes. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this title. The Item Schedule: Briefing: July 18, 2023 Set Date: July 18, 2023 Public Hearing: August 8, 2023 Potential Action: August 15, 2023 Page | 2 planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate safety concerns. The Off-Street Parking Manual was adopted by the Council with the parking ordinance and changes to the manual can be made administratively. If the proposed ordinance is adopted by the Council, Planning staff proposes amendments to the manual as shown in the attached Off-Street Parking Manual section. The Council will be briefed about a proposal initiated by the Administration to amend the zoning ordinance related to the sight distance triangle, which is the area at street, alley, and driveway intersections where views of approaching traffic should not be obstructed. The purpose of sight distance triangles is to allow drivers, pedestrians, and users of other transportation modes to see each other and stop safely. Chapter 21A.62.040 of Salt Lake City Code measures sight distance triangles as a triangular area formed by a diagonal line connecting two points. The code establishes a distance of 30 feet for corner lots and at the intersection of streets and large truck driveways, and a distance of 10 feet for passenger vehicle and light truck driveways crossing a sidewalk. The current code is silent on intersections of alleys and sidewalks and alleys and streets. The proposed amendment adds these intersections, as they have similar risks. In addition, the proposal adds sight distance triangle standards to Salt Lake City Code chapters 21A.36.020 applying to principal buildings and 21A.40.050 related to accessory structures respectively. The images below provide a representation of the proposed changes. Other minor changes are also proposed in the text amendment. These generally clarify fence regulations and add driveway distance requirements from a street intersection to all zoning districts. Under the proposal fences, walls, and hedges on developed properties without a principal structure would be limited to four feet in the front yard area, and six feet in the rear or side yard areas. Hedges are considered fences for zoning purposes and are included in the proposed amendment. The current proposal does not include landscaping and locations of trees. Heights of other plants within the sight distance triangle is included in a separate text amendment and will be consistent with current standards and the proposed amendment. Driveways for single- and two-family dwellings would be required to be a minimum of 20 feet from street corner property lines, and driveways for all other uses would need to be at least 50 feet from street corner property lines. The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its May 10, 2023 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. Images courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division Page | 3 Page | 4 Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTION 1. Are Council Members supportive of the proposed text amendment? KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 3-5 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1-Adding New Language and Clarifying Existing Language As discussed above, intersections of alleys with sidewalks and streets are being added as part of the proposed text amendment. In addition, language restricting principal and accessory buildings is being added to the for consistency in how the requirement is applied. Consideration 2-Noncomplying Fences and Structures Under the proposed amendment, continued use of legally existing noncomplying structures such as fences, buildings, and driveways would be allowed. They could be altered, expanded, and in some cases, replaced. The proposed addition of alley intersections with sidewalks and streets would also not impact these structures. Driveways closer to street intersections than allowed under the proposal would also be allowed to remain and be repaired. Page | 5 Noncomplying structures could be modified provided the changes do not make them more noncompliant. If a noncomplying structure is voluntarily removed or destroyed, a replacement structure would need to comply with the then current standards. Consideration 3-How the proposal helps implement City goals and policies identified in Plan Salt Lake Planning staff referenced the transportation and mobility guiding principle in Plan Salt Lake which says in part “a transportation and mobility network that is safe, accessible, reliable, affordable, and sustainable, providing real choices and connecting people with places.” The sight distance triangle’s purpose is to improve safety by providing unobstructed sightlines at intersections of streets, driveways, sidewalks, and alleys. Incorporating language that includes all types of intersections, transportation modes, and structures will ensure consistent application of requirements and reduce potential for accidents. Additionally, Planning found that the proposed amendments support transportation and mobility initiatives found in Plan Salt Lake, and in particular, Initiatives 5 and 3 which are respectively “Make walking and cycling viable, safe, and convenient transportation options in all areas of the City” and “Create a safe and convenient place for people to carry out their daily lives.” Planning further noted the proposal is in line with guiding principle 1 of Plan Salt Lake “Neighborhoods that provide a safe environment, opportunity for social interaction, and services needed for the wellbeing of the community therein.” Planning staff stated “…the purpose of this proposal is to increase safety for all modes of transportation at all points of potential conflict.” ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT STANDARDS Planning staff reviewed the proposed text amendment against the following criteria City Code says the City Council should consider. Please see Attachment B (pages 10-11) of the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the City as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies A proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements the best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Complies Page | 6 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • January 27, 2023 - Application accepted. • January 30, 2023 - Petition assigned to Madison Blodgett, Associate Planner. • October 2022 - Petition reviewed internally, and staff drafted language to support goals of the February 2023 petition. • February 15, 2023-Notice mailed to all community councils. • February 15, 2023-Application posted for the online open house. • March 20, 2023-Planning staff presented the proposal at the Sugar House Community Council. • April 27, 2023-Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. • May 10, 2023-Planning Commission meeting and public hearing. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. • May 17, 2023-Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office. • May 23, 2023-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • May 30, 2023-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Salt Lake City // Off-Street Parking Standards Manual 10 Figure 7 // Driveway Slope 2.2 VISUALLY CLEAR SIGHT ZONE AREAS AT RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS16 2.2.1 Bushes, trees, and other types of vegetation as well as walls and fences can visually block pedestrians, bicyclists, and cars from being seen by drivers entering the street from driveways. To provide the needed visibility for safety, vegetation should be kept trimmed within the clear sight zone areas on both sides of driveways as illustrated in Figures 8 and 9. 2.2.2 A clear sight zone area is achieved when vision is not blocked between thirty inches (30”) and seven feet (7’) above ground within a ten foot (10’) by ten foot (10’) triangle on both sides of the driveway and between the sidewalk and the street. 2.2.3 A new proposed driveway needs to provide a five foot (5’) clearance in the park strip between the edge of driveway and edge of obstacle such as trees, poles and fire hydrants as illustrated in Figure 9. 2.2.4 When permitted by the zoning ordinance, a proposed retaining wall or fence located in the clear sight zone area as illustrated in Figures 8 and 9. 16 From SLC Engineering Standards - Section E2.c2. Figure 8 // Clear Sight Zone Perspective from Sidewalk Salt Lake City // Off-Street Parking Standards Manual 11 Figure 9 // Clear Sight Zone Dimensions 2.3 ADDITIONAL PARKING ACCESS STANDARDS17 2.3.1 Access to additional parking shall be provided by either; A. Widening the approach from the street to match the width of the new driveway provided all provisions for driveways from 21A.44.060.B.3.c can be met; B. A driveway taper from the sidewalk at no less than a forty five degree (45°) angle with the remnant area in the front yard area landscaped with a minimum of shrubs and ground cover, provided that this option is not allowed if the remnant landscaped area is less than forty five (45) square feet or if curb, gutter and sidewalk are not present. 3. SURFACING STANDARDS 17 Newly proposed section to clarify options for drive approaches to widened driveways. 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2023 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the sight distance triangle.) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054 pertaining to the sight distance triangle. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 10, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054) to amend portions of Chapters 21A.36; 21A.40; 21A.44; and 21A.62 of the Salt Lake City Code to modify regulations pertaining to sight distance triangle; and WHEREAS, at its May 10, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.020. That Section 21A.36.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls) shall be, and hereby is amended to include the following subpart D while retaining all other subparts, tables, and notes in said section: D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this title. Clear site zone areas shall be provided as indicated in the Salt Lake City Off Street Parking Standards Manual. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation 2 director, may approve alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate safety concerns. SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.050. That Section 21A.40.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include the following subpart D while retaining all other text and subparts in said section: D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this title. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate safety concerns. SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1. Fences, walls, and hedges shall comply with the following regulations based on the following zoning districts: a. Residential Zoning Districts: (1) Except as permitted in subsection 21A.24.010.P and 21A.40.120.E.4 of this code, a fence, wall or hedge located between the front property line and front building line of the facade of the principal structure that contains the primary entrance shall not exceed 4 feet in height. (2) A fence, wall, or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed 6 feet in height. (3) On developed properties where there is no existing principal structure, the height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed 4 feet in a front yard area or 6 feet in the rear or side yard areas. 3 b. Nonresidential Zoning Districts: (1) A fence, wall, or hedge located between the front property line and the primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed 4 feet in height. (2) A fence, wall or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed 6 feet in height. (3) On developed properties where there is no existing principal structure, the height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed 4 feet in a front yard area or 6 feet in the rear or side yard areas. 4 (4) Notwithstanding Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1.b.(1), in the M-2 and EI zoning districts fences, walls, or hedges may be up to 6 feet in height when located between the front property line and the front yard setback line. (5) If there is no minimum front yard setback in the underlying zoning district, a fence, wall, or hedge of a maximum 6 feet in height may be placed no closer than 10 feet from the property line. (6) Outdoor storage, when permitted in the zoning district, shall be located behind the primary facade of the principal structure and shall be screened with a solid wall or fence and shall comply with the requirements in Section 5.60.120. Outdoor storage in the M-1 and M-2 districts are also subject to the provisions of 21A.28.010.B.3. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 3. Vacant Lots. Notwithstanding 21A.24.010.P.10.d, fencing to secure vacant or undeveloped lots may be up to 6 feet in height, provided the fence is not closer than 5 feet to a public sidewalk and is no less than 80% transparent. Once the property is developed, the fence will be required to comply with the height restrictions of this title. SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 5. Vision Clearance and Safety. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, a fence, wall, or hedge shall comply with the sight distance triangle requirements of this section. a. Corner Lots; Sight Distance Triangle: No solid fence, wall or hedge shall be erected to a height in excess of 3 feet if the fence, wall or hedge is located within the sight distance triangle extending 30 feet either side of the intersection of the respective street curb lines, or edge lines of roadway where curbing is not provided as noted in Section 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. 5 b. Intersection of Street and Driveway; Intersection of Alley or Driveway and Sidewalk; Sight Distance Triangle: Solid fences, walls and hedges shall not exceed 30 inches in height within the sight distance triangle as defined in Section 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. c. Sight Distance Triangle and See Through Fences: Within the area defined as a sight distance triangle, see through fences that are at least 50% open shall be allowed to a height of 4 feet. d. Alternative Design Solutions. To provide adequate line of sight for driveways and alleys, the zoning administrator, in consulting with the development review team, may require alternative design solutions, including, but not restricted to, requiring increased fence setback and/or lower fence height, to mitigate safety concerns created by the location of buildings, grade change or other preexisting conditions. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 7. Gates. No gate, whether crossing a driveway, walkway, or part of a fence, shall be erected to a height in excess of the standards outlined in this subsection E. To regulate the location of gates and their impact on vehicular staging within the public right of way, passenger vehicles shall require a minimum 17 foot 6 inch setback from back edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided, and large truck driveways shall require a 100 foot setback from back edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided. This requirement does not apply to gates abutting alleys. All gates are to swing inward to the property or be a roll gate that does not impact the staging area. SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c. That Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location and Design: Generally: Driveway and Access) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: c. Driveway Standards: All driveways shall comply with the following standards: 6 (1) Driveway Location: Driveways shall be at least 5 feet from any public utility infrastructure such as power poles, fire hydrants, and water meters. Except for entrance and exit driveways leading to approved parking areas, no curb cuts or driveways are permitted. (2) Distance from street corners: Driveways for Single and Two-Family Dwellings shall be located at least 20 feet from street corner property lines. Driveways for all other uses shall be at least 50 feet from street corner property lines. When the width of the lot is less than the required distance, the transportation director may approve modifications no greater than the minimum necessary to accommodate the driveway. (3) Driveway Widths: All driveways serving residential uses shall be a minimum 8 feet wide and shall comply with the standards for maximum driveway widths listed in Table 21A.44.060-C, “Minimum and Maximum Driveway Width”. (4) Shared Driveways: Shared driveways, where two (2) or more properties share one (1) driveway access, may be permitted if the transportation director determines that the design and location of the shared driveway access will not create adverse impacts on traffic congestion or public safety. (5) Driveway Surface: All driveways providing access to parking facilities shall be improved and maintained pursuant to the standards in the Off Street Standards Manual. SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That the definition of Sight Distance Triangle in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Terms: Definitions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows while retaining all other definitions in said section: SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE: A triangular area formed by a diagonal line connecting two (2) points when measured as follows: 7 A. For corner lots: Extending 30 feet from the intersecting line of each street face of curb, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. B. For intersections of street and driveways or alleys: Extending 10 feet from each intersecting edge of the driveway or alley and street curb line, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. C. For alleys or driveways crossing a sidewalk: Extending 10 feet from each intersecting edge of the alley or driveway and back edge of the sidewalk. The purpose of the sight distance triangle is to define an area in which vision obstructions are prohibited. (See illustration in Section 21A.62.050 of this chapter.) SECTION 9. Replacing Illustration I of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.050. That Illustration I, the Sight Distance Triangle, in Section 21A.62.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Terms: Illustrations Of Selected Definitions) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Illustration I: Sight Distance Triangle 8 9 SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2023. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2023. Published: ______________. Ordinace regulating sight distance triangle APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney August 2, 2023 1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. _____ of 2023 2 3 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 4 pertaining to the sight distance triangle.) 5 6 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 7 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054 pertaining to the sight distance triangle. 8 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 9 public hearing on May 10, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall 10 (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054) to amend portions of Chapters 21A.36; 21A.40; 21A.44; 11 and 21A.62 of the Salt Lake City Code to modify regulations pertaining to sight distance triangle; 12 and 13 WHEREAS, at its May 10, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 14 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 15 petition; and 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.020. That 21 Section 21A.36.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with 22 Lot and Bulk Controls) shall be, and hereby is amended to include the following subpart D while 23 retaining all other subparts, tables, and notes in said section: 24 D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the 25 Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this 26 title. Clear sight zone areas shall be provided as indicated in the Salt Lake City Off Street 27 Parking Standards Manual. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation 28 2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT director, may approve alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and 29 effectively mitigate safety concerns. 30 31 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.050. That 32 Section 21A.40.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and 33 Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be, and hereby is amended to 34 include the following subpart D while retaining all other text and subparts in said section: 35 D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the 36 Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this 37 title. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve 38 alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate 39 safety concerns. 40 41 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1. 42 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 43 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, 44 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 45 1. Fences, walls, and hedges shall comply with the following regulations based on the 46 following zoning districts: 47 a. Residential Zoning Districts: 48 (1) Except as permitted in subsection 21A.24.010.P and 21A.12.E.4 49 21A.40.120.E.4 of this code, a fence, wall or hedge located between the front property 50 line and front building line of the facade of the principal structure that contains the 51 primary entrance shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. 52 (2) A fence, wall, or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the 53 principal structure shall not exceed 6 feet in height. 54 (3) On developed properties Where where there is no existing principal 55 structure, the height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed four (4) feet in a front 56 yard area or six (6) feet in the rear or side yard areas. 57 58 3 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 59 60 b. Nonresidential Zoning Districts: 61 (1) A fence, wall, or hedge located between the front property line and the 62 primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. 63 (2) A fence, wall or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the 64 principal structure shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. 65 66 (3) On developed properties where there is no existing principal structure, the 67 height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed 4 feet in a front yard area or 6 feet in 68 the rear or side yard areas. 69 4 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT (3) Not withstanding (4) Notwithstanding Subsection 21A.40.120.1.b.(l) 70 21A.40.120.E.1.b.(1), in the M-2 and EI zoning districts fences, walls, or hedges may be 71 up to six (6) feet in height if when located between the front property line and the front 72 yard setback line. 73 (4) (5) If there is no minimum front yard setback in the underlying zoning 74 district, a fence, wall, or hedge of a maximum six (6) feet in height may be placed no 75 closer than ten (10) feet from the property line. 76 (5) (6) Outdoor storage, when permitted in the zoning district, shall be located 77 behind the primary facade of the principal structure and shall be screened with a solid 78 wall or fence and shall comply with the requirements in Section 5.60.120. Outdoor 79 storage in the M-1 and M-2 districts are also subject to the provisions of 21A.28.010.B.3. 80 81 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3. 82 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 83 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, 84 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 85 3. Vacant Lots. Notwithstanding 21A.24.010.P.10.d, fencing to secure vacant or 86 undeveloped lots may be up to six (6) feet in height, provided the fence is not closer 87 than five (5) feet to a public sidewalk and is no less than eighty percent (80%) 88 transparent. Once the property is developed, the fence will be required to comply with 89 the height restrictions of this Ttitle. 90 91 SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5. 92 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 93 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, 94 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 95 5. Vision Clearance and Safety. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, a 96 fence, wall, or hedge shall comply with the Ssight Ddistance Ttriangle Rrequirements 97 of this Ssection. 98 a. Corner Lots; Sight Distance Triangle: No solid fence, wall or hedge shall be 99 erected to a height in excess of three (3) feet if the fence, wall or hedge is located within 100 the sight distance triangle extending thirty (30) feet either side of the intersection of the 101 5 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT respective street curb lines, or edge lines of roadway where curbing is not provided as 102 noted in sSection 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. 103 b. Corner Side, Side, Rear Yards; Sight Distance Triangle: Fences, walls or hedges 104 may be erected in any required corner side yard (extending to a point in line with the 105 front facade of the principal structure for residential zoning districts and up to any 106 required front yard setback line for all other zoning districts), required side yard or 107 required rear yard to a height not to exceed six (6) feet. The zoning administrator may 108 require either increased fence setback or lower fence height along corner side yards to 109 provide adequate line of sight for driveways and alleys. 110 c. b. Intersection of Street and Driveway; Intersection of Alley or Driveway 111 and Sidewalk; Sight Distance Triangle: Solid fences, walls and hedges shall not exceed 112 thirty (30) inches in height within the sight distance triangle as defined in sSection 113 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. 114 d. c. Sight Distance Triangle Aand See Through Fences: Within the area 115 defined as a sight distance triangle, see through fences that are at least fifty percent (50%) 116 open shall be allowed to a height of four (4) feet. 117 e. d. Alternative Design Solutions. To provide adequate line of sight for 118 driveways and alleys, the zoning administrator, in consulting with the development 119 review team, may require alternative design solutions, including, but not restricted to, 120 requiring increased fence setback and/or lower fence height, to mitigate safety concerns 121 created by the location of buildings, grade change or other preexisting conditions. 122 123 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7. 124 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 125 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 126 as follows: 127 7. Gates. No gate, whether crossing a driveway, walkway, or part of a fence, shall be 128 erected to a height in excess of the standards outlined in this subsection E. To regulate 129 the location of gates and their impact on vehicular staging within the public right of 130 way, passenger vehicles shall require a minimum seventeen (17) foot six (6) inch 131 setback from back edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided, 132 and large truck driveways shall require a one hundred (100) foot setback from back 133 edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided. This requirement 134 does not apply to gates abutting alleys. All gates are to swing inward to the property 135 or be a roll gate that does not impact the staging area. 136 137 6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c. 138 That Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, 139 Mobility and Loading: Parking Location and Design: Generally: Driveway and Access) shall be, 140 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 141 c. Driveway Standards: All driveways shall comply with the following standards: 142 (1) Driveway Location in Residential Zoning Districts: With the exception of legal 143 shared driveways, driveways shall be at least twenty feet (20') from street corner property 144 lines and Driveways shall be at least five5 feet (5') from any public utility infrastructure such 145 as power poles, fire hydrants, and water meters. Except for entrance and exit driveways 146 leading to approved parking areas, no curb cuts or driveways are permitted. 147 (2) Distance from street corners: Driveways for Single and Two-Family Dwellings 148 shall be located at least 20 feet from street corner property lines. Driveways for all other uses 149 shall be at least 50 feet from street corner property lines. When the width of the lot is less 150 than the required distance, the transportation director may approve modifications no greater 151 than the minimum necessary to accommodate the driveway. 152 153 (2)(3) Driveway Widths: All driveways serving residential uses shall be a minimum 154 eight8 feet wide and shall comply with the standards for maximum driveway widths listed in 155 Table 21A.44.060-C, “Minimum and Maximum Driveway Width”. 156 157 158 159 (3)(4) Shared Driveways: Shared driveways, where two (2) or more properties share one 160 (1) driveway access, may be permitted if the transportation director determines that the 161 design and location of the shared driveway access will not create adverse impacts on traffic 162 congestion or public safety. 163 164 7 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT (4)(5) Driveway Surface: All driveways providing access to parking facilities shall be 165 improved and maintained pursuant to the standards in the Off Street Standards Manual. 166 167 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That the 168 definition of Sight Distance Triangle in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: 169 General Terms: Definitions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows while retaining 170 all other definitions in said section: 171 SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE: A triangular area formed by a diagonal line connecting 172 two (2) points when measured as follows: 173 A. For corner lots: Extending thirty30 feet (30') from the intersecting line of each street 174 face of curb, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. Proposals in 175 commercial and industrial districts which have a minimum front or corner side yard 176 setback requirement, that seem to allow encroachment into the sight distance triangle, 177 shall be reviewed through the site plan review process by the city's development 178 review team. 179 180 B. For intersections of street or large truck and driveways or alleys: Extending thirty feet 181 (30') 10 feet from each intersecting edge of the driveway or alley and street face of 182 curb line, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. 183 184 C. For alleys or passenger vehicle and light truck driveways crossing a sidewalk: 185 Extending ten10 feet (10') from each intersecting edge of the alley or driveway and 186 back edge of the sidewalk. 187 188 The purpose of the sight distance triangle is to define an area in which vision obstructions are 189 prohibited. (See illustration in sSection 21A.62.050 of this chapter.) 190 191 SECTION 9. Replacing Illustration I of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.050. That 192 Illustration I, the Sight Distance Triangle, in Section 21A.62.050 of the Salt Lake City Code 193 (Zoning: General Terms: Illustrations Of Selected Definitions) is hereby deleted in its entirety 194 and replaced with the following: 195 8 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Illustration I: Sight Distance Triangle 196 9 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 197 198 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 199 first publication. 200 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 201 2023. 202 ______________________________ 203 CHAIRPERSON 204 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 205 206 ______________________________ 207 CITY RECORDER 208 209 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 210 211 212 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 213 214 ______________________________ 215 MAYOR 216 ______________________________ 217 CITY RECORDER 218 (SEAL) 219 220 Bill No. ________ of 2023. 221 Published: ______________. 222 Ordinace regulating sight distance triangle 223 224 225 226 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 05/30/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 05/30/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 30, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT: PLNPCM2023-00054 STAFF CONTACT: Madison Blodgett, Associate Planner madison.blodgett@slcgov.com or 801-535-7749 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the changes to the zoning ordinance related to the sight distance triangle as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated a petition to amend the zoning ordinance regulations regarding the sight distance triangle, which is the area providing visual clearance at street, alleys and driveways intersections where views of approaching traffic should not be obstructed. Under the current code, sight distance triangles are measured as a triangular area formed by a diagonal line connecting two points. Currently the definition in the code establishes a distance of 30’ for corner lots and at the intersection of street and large truck driveways, and distance of 10’ for passenger vehicle and light truck driveways crossing a sidewalk. The code is silent about intersections of alleys and sidewalks and alleys and streets. Alleys intersecting with sidewalks and streets operate in a similar manner as driveways, and therefore presents similar risks to oncoming pedestrian, vehicular, or bike traffic. The proposed amendment modifies the sight distance triangle to include alleys in the standards. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Lisa Shaffer (May 30, 2023 15:09 MDT) In addition to amending the definition, the proposed amendment will add standards to apply the sight distance triangle regulations to buildings and all other structures not included in fence regulations. In the current code, the sight distance triangle is only referenced in the regulations for fences, walls and hedges. Because no reference is made in other parts of the code, other structures, including buildings, are currently allowed to encroach on the sight distance triangle areas. This creates inconsistent application of the clear zone standards and open doors to hazardous conditions at intersections. In addition to the changes mentioned above, the proposed ordinance will correct minor inconsistencies in the code and help achieve the purpose of the sight distance triangle. More specific information can be found in the Planning Commission Staff Report. The Planning Commission considered the request at a May 10, 2023 public hearing and voted unanimously to send a positive recommendation to the City Council based on staff’s proposed zoning ordinance text. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on February 15, 2023, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The proposal was presented at the March 20, 2023 Sugar House Community Council meeting and the overall response was support for the amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on April 1, 2023. Public Open House: An online open house was held from February 15, 2023, to April 1, 2023. No public comment was received. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 10, 2023. The Planning Commission provided a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS of MAY 26, 2023: Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff report EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Petition to Initiate LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2023 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 pertaining to the sight distance triangle.) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054 pertaining to the sight distance triangle. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 10 public hearing on May 10, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall 11 (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054) to amend portions of Chapters 21A.36; 21A.40; 21A.44; 12 and 21A.62 of the Salt Lake City Code to modify regulations pertaining to sight distance triangle; 13 and 14 WHEREAS, at its May 10, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 15 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 16 petition; and 17 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 18 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 19 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 20 21 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.020. That 22 Section 21A.36.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with 23 Lot and Bulk Controls) shall be, and hereby is amended to include the following subpart D while 24 retaining all other subparts, tables, and notes in said section: 25 D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the 26 Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this 27 title. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2 28 alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate 29 safety concerns. 30 31 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.050. That 32 Section 21A.40.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and 33 Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be, and hereby is amended to 34 include the following subpart D while retaining all other text and subparts in said section: 35 D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the 36 Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this 37 title. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve 38 alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate 39 safety concerns. 40 41 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1. 42 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 43 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, 44 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 45 1. Fences, walls, and hedges shall comply with the following regulations based on the 46 following zoning districts: 47 a. Residential Zoning Districts: 48 (1) Except as permitted in subsection 21A.24.010.P and 21A.12.E.4 49 21A.40.120.E.4 of this code, a fence, wall or hedge located between the front property 50 line and front building line of the facade of the principal structure that contains the 51 primary entrance shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. 52 (2) A fence, wall, or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the 53 principal structure shall not exceed 6 feet in height. 54 (3) On developed properties Where where there is no existing principal 55 structure, the height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed four (4) feet in a front 56 yard area or six (6) feet in the rear or side yard areas. 57 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 3 58 59 60 b. Nonresidential Zoning Districts: 61 (1) A fence, wall, or hedge located between the front property line and the 62 primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. 63 (2) A fence, wall or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the 64 principal structure shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. 65 66 (3) On developed properties where there is no existing principal structure, the 67 height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed 4 feet in a front yard area or 6 feet in 68 the rear or side yard areas. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4 69 (3) Not withstanding (4) Notwithstanding Subsection 21A.40.120.1.b.(l) 70 21A.40.120.E.1.b.(1), in the M-2 and EI zoning districts fences, walls, or hedges may be 71 up to six (6) feet in height if when located between the front property line and the front 72 yard setback line. 73 (4) (5) If there is no minimum front yard setback in the underlying zoning district, 74 a fence, wall, or hedge of a maximum six (6) feet in height may be placed no closer than 75 ten (10) feet from the property line. 76 (5) (6) Outdoor storage, when permitted in the zoning district, shall be located 77 behind the primary facade of the principal structure and shall be screened with a solid 78 wall or fence and shall comply with the requirements in Section 5.60.120. Outdoor 79 storage in the M-1 and M-2 districts are also subject to the provisions of 21A.28.010.B.3. 80 81 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3. 82 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 83 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, 84 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 85 3. Vacant Lots. Notwithstanding 21A.24.010.P.10.d, fencing to secure vacant or 86 undeveloped lots may be up to six (6) feet in height, provided the fence is not closer 87 than five (5) feet to a public sidewalk and is no less than eighty percent (80%) 88 transparent. Once the property is developed, the fence will be required to comply with 89 the height restrictions of this Ttitle. 90 91 SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5. 92 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 93 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, 94 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 95 5. Vision Clearance and Safety. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, a 96 fence, wall, or hedge shall comply with the Ssight Ddistance Ttriangle Rrequirements 97 of this Ssection. 98 a. Corner Lots; Sight Distance Triangle: No solid fence, wall or hedge shall be 99 erected to a height in excess of three (3) feet if the fence, wall or hedge is located within 100 the sight distance triangle extending thirty (30) feet either side of the intersection of the LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5 101 respective street curb lines, or edge lines of roadway where curbing is not provided as 102 noted in sSection 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. 103 b. Corner Side, Side, Rear Yards; Sight Distance Triangle: Fences, walls or hedges 104 may be erected in any required corner side yard (extending to a point in line with the 105 front facade of the principal structure for residential zoning districts and up to any 106 required front yard setback line for all other zoning districts), required side yard or 107 required rear yard to a height not to exceed six (6) feet. The zoning administrator may 108 require either increased fence setback or lower fence height along corner side yards to 109 provide adequate line of sight for driveways and alleys. 110 c. b. Intersection of Street and Driveway; Intersection of Alley or Driveway 111 and Sidewalk; Sight Distance Triangle: Solid fences, walls and hedges shall not exceed 112 thirty (30) inches in height within the sight distance triangle as defined in sSection 113 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. 114 d. c. Sight Distance Triangle Aand See Through Fences: Within the area 115 defined as a sight distance triangle, see through fences that are at least fifty percent (50%) 116 open shall be allowed to a height of four (4) feet. 117 e. d. Alternative Design Solutions. To provide adequate line of sight for 118 driveways and alleys, the zoning administrator, in consulting with the development 119 review team, may require alternative design solutions, including, but not restricted to, 120 requiring increased fence setback and/or lower fence height, to mitigate safety concerns 121 created by the location of buildings, grade change or other preexisting conditions. 122 123 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7. 124 That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings 125 and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 126 as follows: 127 7. Gates. No gate, whether crossing a driveway, walkway, or part of a fence, shall be 128 erected to a height in excess of the standards outlined in this subsection E. To regulate 129 the location of gates and their impact on vehicular staging within the public right of 130 way, passenger vehicles shall require a minimum seventeen (17) foot six (6) inch 131 setback from back edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided, 132 and large truck driveways shall require a one hundred (100) foot setback from back 133 edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided. This requirement 134 does not apply to gates abutting alleys. All gates are to swing inward to the property 135 or be a roll gate that does not impact the staging area. 136 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 6 137 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c. 138 That Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, 139 Mobility and Loading: Parking Location and Design: Generally: Driveway and Access) shall be, 140 and hereby is amended to read as follows: 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 c. Driveway Standards: All driveways shall comply with the following standards: (1) Driveway Location in Residential Zoning Districts: With the exception of legal shared driveways, driveways shall be at least twenty feet (20') from street corner property lines and Driveways shall be at least five5 feet (5') from any public utility infrastructure such as power poles, fire hydrants, and water meters. Except for entrance and exit driveways leading to approved parking areas, no curb cuts or driveways are permitted. (2) Distance from street corners: Driveways for Single and Two-Family Dwellings shall be located at least 20 feet from street corner property lines. Driveways for all other uses shall be at least 50 feet from street corner property lines. When the width of the lot is less than the required distance, the transportation director may approve modifications no greater than the minimum necessary to accommodate the driveway. (2)(3) Driveway Widths: All driveways serving residential uses shall be a minimum eight8 feet wide and shall comply with the standards for maximum driveway widths listed in Table 21A.44.060-C, “Minimum and Maximum Driveway Width”. (3)(4) Shared Driveways: Shared driveways, where two (2) or more properties share one (1) driveway access, may be permitted if the transportation director determines that the design and location of the shared driveway access will not create adverse impacts on traffic congestion or public safety. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 7 164 (4)(5) Driveway Surface: All driveways providing access to parking facilities shall be 165 improved and maintained pursuant to the standards in the Off Street Standards Manual. 166 167 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That the 168 definition of Sight Distance Triangle in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: 169 General Terms: Definitions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows while retaining 170 all other definitions in said section: 171 SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE: A triangular area formed by a diagonal line connecting 172 two (2) points when measured as follows: 173 A. For corner lots: Extending thirty30 feet (30') from the intersecting line of each street 174 face of curb, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. Proposals in 175 commercial and industrial districts which have a minimum front or corner side yard 176 setback requirement, that seem to allow encroachment into the sight distance triangle, 177 shall be reviewed through the site plan review process by the city's development 178 review team. 179 180 B. For intersections of street or large truck and driveways or alleys: Extending thirty feet 181 (30') 10 feet from each intersecting edge of the driveway or alley and street face of 182 curb line, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. 183 184 C. For alleys or passenger vehicle and light truck driveways crossing a sidewalk: 185 Extending ten10 feet (10') from each intersecting edge of the alley or driveway and 186 back edge of the sidewalk. 187 188 The purpose of the sight distance triangle is to define an area in which vision obstructions are 189 prohibited. (See illustration in sSection 21A.62.050 of this chapter.) 190 191 SECTION 9. Replacing Illustration I of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.050. That 192 Illustration I, the Sight Distance Triangle, in Section 21A.62.050 of the Salt Lake City Code 193 (Zoning: General Terms: Illustrations Of Selected Definitions) is hereby deleted in its entirety 194 and replaced with the following: LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8 195 Illustration I: Sight Distance Triangle LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 9 196 197 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10 198 SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 199 first publication. 200 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 201 2023. 202 203 204 205 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CHAIRPERSON 206 207 CITY RECORDER 208 209 Transmitted to Mayor on . 210 211 212 Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. 213 214 215 MAYOR 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: . Ordinace regulating sight distance triangle APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: By: Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the sight distance triangle.) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054 pertaining to the sight distance triangle. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 10, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00054) to amend portions of Chapters 21A.36; 21A.40; 21A.44; and 21A.62 of the Salt Lake City Code to modify regulations pertaining to sight distance triangle; and WHEREAS, at its May 10, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.020. That Section 21A.36.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls) shall be, and hereby is amended to include the following subpart D while retaining all other subparts, tables, and notes in said section: D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this title. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve 2 alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate safety concerns. SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.050. That Section 21A.40.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: General Yard, Bulk and Height Limitations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include the following subpart D while retaining all other text and subparts in said section: D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, all structures shall comply with the Sight Distance Triangle Requirements as defined and illustrated in Chapter 21A.62 of this title. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may approve alternative design solutions that result in similar visual clearance and effectively mitigate safety concerns. SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1. Fences, walls, and hedges shall comply with the following regulations based on the following zoning districts: a. Residential Zoning Districts: (1) Except as permitted in subsection 21A.24.010.P and 21A.40.120.E.4 of this code, a fence, wall or hedge located between the front property line and front building line of the facade of the principal structure that contains the primary entrance shall not exceed 4 feet in height. (2) A fence, wall, or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed 6 feet in height. (3) On developed properties where there is no existing principal structure, the height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed 4 feet in a front yard area or 6 feet in the rear or side yard areas. 3 b. Nonresidential Zoning Districts: (1) A fence, wall, or hedge located between the front property line and the primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed 4 feet in height. (2) A fence, wall or hedge located at or behind the primary facade of the principal structure shall not exceed 6 feet in height. (3) On developed properties where there is no existing principal structure, the height of a fence, wall, or hedge shall not exceed 4 feet in a front yard area or 6 feet in the rear or side yard areas. 4 (4) Notwithstanding Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1.b.(1), in the M-2 and EI zoning districts fences, walls, or hedges may be up to 6 feet in height when located between the front property line and the front yard setback line. (5) If there is no minimum front yard setback in the underlying zoning district, a fence, wall, or hedge of a maximum 6 feet in height may be placed no closer than 10 feet from the property line. (6) Outdoor storage, when permitted in the zoning district, shall be located behind the primary facade of the principal structure and shall be screened with a solid wall or fence and shall comply with the requirements in Section 5.60.120. Outdoor storage in the M-1 and M-2 districts are also subject to the provisions of 21A.28.010.B.3. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 3. Vacant Lots. Notwithstanding 21A.24.010.P.10.d, fencing to secure vacant or undeveloped lots may be up to 6 feet in height, provided the fence is not closer than 5 feet to a public sidewalk and is no less than 80% transparent. Once the property is developed, the fence will be required to comply with the height restrictions of this title. SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges: Height Restrictions and Gates) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 5. Vision Clearance and Safety. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, a fence, wall, or hedge shall comply with the sight distance triangle requirements of this section. a. Corner Lots; Sight Distance Triangle: No solid fence, wall or hedge shall be erected to a height in excess of 3 feet if the fence, wall or hedge is located within the sight distance triangle extending 30 feet either side of the intersection of the respective street curb lines, or edge lines of roadway where curbing is not provided as noted in Section 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. 5 b. Intersection of Street and Driveway; Intersection of Alley or Driveway and Sidewalk; Sight Distance Triangle: Solid fences, walls and hedges shall not exceed 30 inches in height within the sight distance triangle as defined in Section 21A.62.050, illustration I of this title. c. Sight Distance Triangle and See Through Fences: Within the area defined as a sight distance triangle, see through fences that are at least 50% open shall be allowed to a height of 4 feet. d. Alternative Design Solutions. To provide adequate line of sight for driveways and alleys, the zoning administrator, in consulting with the development review team, may require alternative design solutions, including, but not restricted to, requiring increased fence setback and/or lower fence height, to mitigate safety concerns created by the location of buildings, grade change or other preexisting conditions. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7. That Subsection 21A.40.120.E.7 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Accessory Uses, Buildings and Structures: Regulation of Fences, Walls and Hedges) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 7. Gates. No gate, whether crossing a driveway, walkway, or part of a fence, shall be erected to a height in excess of the standards outlined in this subsection E. To regulate the location of gates and their impact on vehicular staging within the public right of way, passenger vehicles shall require a minimum 17 foot 6 inch setback from back edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided, and large truck driveways shall require a 100 foot setback from back edge of sidewalk, or property line when a sidewalk is not provided. This requirement does not apply to gates abutting alleys. All gates are to swing inward to the property or be a roll gate that does not impact the staging area. SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c. That Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location and Design: Generally: Driveway and Access) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: c. Driveway Standards: All driveways shall comply with the following standards: 6 (1) Driveway Location: Driveways shall be at least 5 feet from any public utility infrastructure such as power poles, fire hydrants, and water meters. Except for entrance and exit driveways leading to approved parking areas, no curb cuts or driveways are permitted. (2) Distance from street corners: Driveways for Single and Two-Family Dwellings shall be located at least 20 feet from street corner property lines. Driveways for all other uses shall be at least 50 feet from street corner property lines. When the width of the lot is less than the required distance, the transportation director may approve modifications no greater than the minimum necessary to accommodate the driveway. (3) Driveway Widths: All driveways serving residential uses shall be a minimum 8 feet wide and shall comply with the standards for maximum driveway widths listed in Table 21A.44.060-C, “Minimum and Maximum Driveway Width”. (4) Shared Driveways: Shared driveways, where two (2) or more properties share one (1) driveway access, may be permitted if the transportation director determines that the design and location of the shared driveway access will not create adverse impacts on traffic congestion or public safety. (5) Driveway Surface: All driveways providing access to parking facilities shall be improved and maintained pursuant to the standards in the Off Street Standards Manual. SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That the definition of Sight Distance Triangle in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Terms: Definitions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows while retaining all other definitions in said section: SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE: A triangular area formed by a diagonal line connecting two (2) points when measured as follows: 7 A. For corner lots: Extending 30 feet from the intersecting line of each street face of curb, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. B. For intersections of street and driveways or alleys: Extending 10 feet from each intersecting edge of the driveway or alley and street curb line, or edge of roadway where curbing is not provided. C. For alleys or driveways crossing a sidewalk: Extending 10 feet from each intersecting edge of the alley or driveway and back edge of the sidewalk. The purpose of the sight distance triangle is to define an area in which vision obstructions are prohibited. (See illustration in Section 21A.62.050 of this chapter.) SECTION 9. Replacing Illustration I of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.050. That Illustration I, the Sight Distance Triangle, in Section 21A.62.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Terms: Illustrations Of Selected Definitions) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Illustration I: Sight Distance Triangle 8 9 SECTION 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: . Ordinace regulating sight distance triangle APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: May 22, 2023 By: Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney Project Chronology Petition: PLNPCM2023-00054 January 27, 2023 January 30, 2023 Application accepted. Petition assigned to Madison Blodgett, Associate Planner. October 2022 – Petition reviewed internally, and staff drafted language to support goals of February 2023 the petition. February 15, 2023 Notice mailed to all Community Councils February 15, 2023 Application posted for the online open house. March 20, 2023 Presented proposal at Sugar House Community Council meeting. April 27, 2023 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. May 4, 2023 Staff report posted to Planning’s webpage. May 10, 2023 Planning Commission meeting and public hearing. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. May 23, 2023 Signed ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00054 – Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated a petition to amend the zoning ordinance regulations regarding the sight distance triangle, which is the area providing visual clearance at street, alleys and driveways intersections. The proposed changes will affect sections 21A.40.120, regulations for fences, walls and hedges, 21A.36.020 and 21A.40.050 to apply visual clearance to buildings, and 21A.62.040 to update the definition of sight distance triangle. Related provisions of Title 21A, Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition. (Staff contact: Madison Blodgett at madison.blodgett@slcgov.com or 801-535-7749) As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TBD TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Madison Blodgett at 801-535-7749 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at madison.blodgett@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00054. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. Item C2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY24CIP TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:August 15, 2023 RE:Capital Improvement Program Project Allocations for Fiscal Year 2024 MOTION 1 – ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the Capital Improvement Program project-specific allocations for Fiscal Year 2024 as shown on the attached Exhibit A Funding Log. Optional Legislative Intent: FY2024 Data-driven Prioritization of Traffic Calming Projects I further move, it is the intent of the Council to request that applications to the Capital Improvement Program for traffic calming projects should be included in the Livable Streets Program's data-driven process to standardize the prioritization process across funding streams. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1 Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning Requested Funding: $190,000 Many complex structural and drainage issues at Library Plaza are causing known settling and damage to critical materials (e.g., pavers, railings and footings, walls) visible on the surface. This project will include an investigation into these issues, followed by planning and design to complete the necessary changes. Specific plaza elements that will be investigated include the wedge wall near 200 East, fountain, retaining walls and pavers, and overall stability throughout the plaza. The project will also include a planning process to identify solutions and designs for activating the plaza. These will mitigate currently unknown and known barriers (including direct sunlight and little shade or protection from the elements) to increased usage in line with its original intent as a public event space. Salt Lake City is a potential candidate for the 2030 Olympics and structural repairs, retrofitting, and reimagining space within this site will be critical first steps if the City wants to use this site to host events and accommodate large crowds. If funded, this request would lay the groundwork for a funding application for construction within the next few years. Once construction is funded, this project will be a joint venture between Public Lands and Facilities. 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2 Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide Requested Funding: $900,000 This request will fund two key projects as well as providing ongoing funding to a citywide program that installs warranted crossing beacons, traffic signals, or other traffic control devices to address safety issues. 1. Main Street Pedestrian Crossings - Crosswalks on Main Street are simply inadequate by modern standards; the Transportation Division has developed a phased improvement plan that began with a 2022 resurfacing project after which Main Street was restriped with one travel lane in each direction. Ten crossing locations need upgraded crosswalks; about half will be done in 2023 with funds already allocated. This request is for construction funds for the remaining locations. 2. Glendale Park / 1700 South - Community engagement show an overwhelming desire from neighborhood residents to have a safer and more comfortable way to cross 1700 South, with residents repeatedly requesting a tunnel or bridge to cross this wide roadway carrying heavy truck traffic. This request is for funds to upgrade the existing crosswalk at 1300 W 1700 S from flashing yellow beacons (RRFBs) to a pedestrian- activated signal (HAWK, Toucan, or half-signal), to fully stop traffic with a red light between the residential Glendale neighborhoods to the north and the new Glendale Regional Park (Phase 1 - 2024) to the south. 3. Citywide traffic safety projects include the installation of traffic control devices such as signals, flashers, signs, or markings to improve pedestrian safety. 270,000$ -$ 540,000$ -$ 90,000$ -$ 270,000$ -$ 540,000$ -$ 90,000$ -$ Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 1 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 3 200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements Requested Funding: $234,000 200 East ADA and sidewalk improvements. This project seeks to bring a section of sidewalks near senior housing into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It also seeks to improve walkability in a low-income neighborhood by fixing a gap in continuous sidewalks. The area — between 1700 South and 2100 South — is home to a higher proportion of people with disabilities than any other Census tract in the state of Utah, yet a portion of it is inaccessible to people with disabilities. There is a 300 ft segment of 200 East that does not have sidewalks on the east side of the street between Garfield Ave and Coatsville Ave. Through discussions with City staff and the constituent applicant, we developed a solution that provides a continuous ADA accessible pathway on the west side of 200 East between Garfield Ave and 1700 South. This involves new curb ramps at Downington Ave/200 E and Garfield Ave/200 E), about 50 ft of sidewalk replacement, and pavement markings to formalize the crosswalks. Additionally, a crosswalk upgrades will be added at 200 East 1700 South, where there is a marked crosswalk near a high school, the Salt Lake Community College and the Tim and Brenda Huval daycare center on the north side of 1700 South. Driver cooperation is low at this crosswalk, and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) will help to ensure compliance and a safer crossing. 234,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 234,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments Requested Funding: $1,500,000 Funds will construct bus stops along frequent transit routes that reflect the recommendations of the Transit Master Plan. Examples include the 200 (State Street), 209 (900 East) and 217 (Redwood Road). Improvements ensure that stops are legal, accessible, safe, and convenient. This is a partnership program with UTA, with investment by the City made to complement (rather than supplant) UTA's plans for bus stop construction as articulated in their Bus Stop Master Plan, and City investments generate UTA investments. Salt Lake City constructs the concrete pad, and UTA provides the shelters, benches, bike racks, and trash cans. They also empty the trash cans! If accessibility is limited by bicycle and/or pedestrian connections to bus stops, these funds may be used to close those gaps. Funds may also provide match to $5.59 million in federal grants received so far for transit hubs (especially 200 S East Downtown Hub, Westside North Temple Hub). The transit hubs are multi-million dollar projects; a portion of these funds will be used to provide the required local match. These projects are also partnership projects with UTA (and other potential partners, such as the University of Utah and real estate developers), with both agencies seeking funds, providing match, and together creating the full project. In some cases, these funds were combined with other projects to maximize those investments, for example by mobilizing construction crews once for two or more related and co-located projects. This also serves to minimize construction disruption to the community. -$ 990,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ 990,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 2 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 5 Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide Requested Funding: $6,600,000 This program funding request provides supplemental funds to street projects that have been found, including through input from the community, to need additional complete street elements such as sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, bikeways, safer intersections, placemaking, and street greening. • 2100 South (700 E to 1300 E) - This corridor in the heart of Sugarhouse has long needed reconstruction and represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make substantial upgrades to its central role in one of Salt Lake City's largest and most walkable business districts. This street currently does a poor job of serving all who use it. This funding would enable the City to complete a meaningful transformation of this critical roadway with complete streets improvements for all modes. • Virginia Street (11th Ave to South Temple) - This neighborhood road provides access between the Avenues and South Temple for people driving, walking, riding, or taking the bus. The road is missing sections of sidewalk on the west side, lacks bike lanes (more bicyclists use Virginia Street than other principal north-south streets in the Avenues), and has aging medians that the neighborhood has long desired to have removed (and replaced with more effective traffic calming). The requested funding would fill the gaps of missing sidewalk, improve bus stops, enhance pedestrian crossings, add uphill bike lane/downhill shared lane, and implement traffic calming. • Citywide corridor designs and restriping, primarily tied to Streets Division surface treatments and/or in preparation for reconstruction. -$ -$ 3,293,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,293,000$ -$ -$ -$ 6 Public Way Concrete 2023/2024 Requested Funding: $750,000 This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 4 years has averaged 53%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Not only is it the City's legal responsibility to ensure the public way is accessible to all, it is a moral obligation. -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 3 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 7 Livable Streets Implementation Requested Funding: $2,500,000 This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to Transportation staff - speeding vehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable prioritization process for the implementation of traffic calming improvements in the areas most in need. 250,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 1,394,126$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8 Neighborhood Byways Requested Funding: $800,000 Neighborhood byways create pleasant and convenient routes for people walking, bicycling, or rolling by encouraging safe travel speeds, discouraging cut-through vehicle traffic, providing safe crossings of busy streets, and connecting people to key community destinations. These funds will be used for the engineering design and construction of the Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway, and for the engineering design of the Sugar House to the U Neighborhood Byway. Both of these projects are currently in conceptual design with significant community input. The Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway has already received a state grant for $900,000 toward its $1.5 million construction budget. This CIP request will serve as the required 40% match to this grant. 440,000$ -$ 360,000$ -$ -$ -$ 440,000$ -$ 360,000$ -$ -$ -$ 9 Complete Streets Reconstruction 2023/2024 Requested Funding: $4,500,000 This annual program funds reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where appropriate, it will include appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. 2,250,000$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 4 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 10 Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion Requested Funding: $507,000 This park (Emery St and 800 S.) currently has a half court - which is used, frequently, with players spilling out all over the court and grass surrounding it. Basketball, to an extent, is the glue that holds the youth in our neighborhood together. It creates bonds. Sees no color - just "mad skills"! This park has needed some TLC for a VERY long time. This year, we finally saw some improvements in the form of sprinkler repairs. Our volleyball court received some intense care to pull out weeds, and till the sand. Guess what? The youth and families are now converging for a game or two every other day. "If you build it, they will come," holds true over and over again as we start to see some overdue care on the Westside. Adding the full basketball court, along with the dual pickle ball and tennis court (underway by the Public Lands Dept.) to this Park, will bring it to the light it truly deserves. This project will fund the expansion of the court which includes demolition, irrigation adjustments, a new concrete court, fencing, signage (that would include a flower bed, which will provide beautification opportunities for Friends of Poplar Grove Park to showcase their flower planting skills over the years). Furthermore, it will also fund an artist to design and paint a mural on the new court. Which will provide an opportunity for local artists to share their talents with the community. There are so many benefits to this project - it invites all to participate, enjoy and cherish this wonderful open space for many years to come. COVID-19 may have been a hard time to deal with, but our parks became the extension of our homes and will remain that way for a long 253,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 253,500$ 253,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 253,500$ 11 Jordan Park and Peace Gardens Cultural Landscape Report and Master Plan Requested Funding: $200,000 This project will fund the development of a Cultural Landscape Report (CLR) for the 33.5 acres of both Jordan Park and the International Peace Gardens. The CLR will outline site history, elements and features that contribute to the historic and cultural significance of the site, and recommendations to retain and enhance these values. The CLR will inform and be followed by a Master Plan for the site. The master plan will include potential recommendations for how and if Salt Lake City should expand the Peace Gardens and increase amenities and programming at Jordan Park. This funding will include robust community and stakeholder engagement, visioning for both sites, as well as implementation strategies and prioritization. Public Lands has received significant interest from stakeholders, cultural associations and organizations, and individuals to expand the Peace Gardens, which will require formal planning before proceeding with expansion. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 5 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 12 Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet Requested Funding: $850,000 In November 2022, Public Lands acquired a property adjoining Cottonwood Dog Park and the Jordan River located at 356 Redwood Road. The dirt lot has long been used as an informal parking lot for dog park users, even prior to property acquisition. This project would develop a trailhead and parking lot that better serve the park’s current and future users. This site has the potential to better serve as a gateway to the Jordan River Trail and to Cottonwood Park as a whole, with interpretive signage, wayfinding, improved connectivity, landscaping, and a small gathering space along the river. This would also provide lighting and artwork to provide a welcoming space. This project also funds a new restroom facility to replace the existing failing restroom. 202,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 202,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 13 Three Creeks West - Roadways Addendum Requested Funding: $850,000 At the urging and recommendation of Salt Lake City staff, this application comes to rectify a miscalculation by the city in estimating the cost of the 2023 CIP "Three Creeks West – Roadways" project, which calls for reconstructing about two blocks of 1300 South and 1000 West beside the Jordan River. This Council-approved project will install sanitary sewers, storm sewers, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, roadway reconstruction and all necessary infrastructure. None of this infrastructure exists in this residential neighborhood, established in the 1920s to 1950s. The oldest house on the roadway was built in 1925 and mine was built in 1939. Installing sanitary sewers will enable removal of failing septic systems that are leaching harmful E. coli into surface water, causing a health threat. This project is endorsed by the Glendale Community Council and residents of all 25 homes on the roadways. Staff tell me the 2023 city-generated estimate for this project fell short to cover costs, and $850,000 more is needed. The project was approved by the CIP citizen advisory board, Mayor Erin Mendenhall, and ratified in resolution by the City Council on Aug. 16, 2022. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14 Complete Streets Overlay 2023/2024 Requested Funding: $3,500,000 This annual program funds rehabilitation of deteriorated City streets, including curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where appropriate, it will include appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. -$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 6 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 15 Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail Requested Funding: $1,700,000 Two projects are critical to this urban trails request: connectivity for The Other Side Village just west of Redwood Road, and a short gap in the 9-Line Trail near the University of Utah. This request seeks funding for critical trail connections in support of "The Other Side Village," the tiny home village with assistive services that will be constructed just west of Redwood Road in the City's Glendale / Poplar Grove neighborhoods. The Village is very near, but not yet connected to, key resources including frequent transit service on Redwood Road; a new Transit Hub approximately 1/3 mile directly north at Orange Street and 500 South; and the existing 9-Line Trail (from Redwood Road to the University of Utah). A charter school, Wallace Stegner Academy, also west of Redwood Road, is an additional key destination to be served by these trails. $1.2 million will be allocated to begin improvements, currently under study, which will prioritize a multi-use trail and/or sidewalks on Indiana Avenue; safer crossings of Redwood Road; a new multi-use trail north from the Village to the transit center; and/or segments of the 9-line trail and Surplus Canal Trail (see map). This is anticipated to be Phase 1 of three or four requests. Funds will also be used for a missing gap in the 9-Line Trail near the University of Utah, where the 12' wide multi-use trail along Sunnyside Avenue narrows down to a scant 4' wide sidewalk, creating conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians. This segment was not able to be developed during the initial trail construction due to a lack of easement from the property owner; a portion of the $500,000 request will be used to secure that easement as well as to construct the full width of trail. -$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ 16 Rose Park and Jordan River Recreation Hub Requested Funding: $459,000 The Public Lands Department has the opportunity to acquire the Rose Park Golf Course driving range from its Golf Division for the purpose of improving more equitably accessible public open space. This improvement would vastly expand green space in the Rose Park and Westpointe areas. This project would fund planning, community engagement, and conceptual design for the future driving range site as well as the existing Roots Disc Golf Course as one cohesive recreation hub. This hub would be the largest open space along the Jordan River within Salt Lake City. This funding would not include the acquisition costs of the driving range, only planning and conceptual design for that site. In addition, this project would fund design and construction of specific site improvements identified in the planning and engagement process at the Roots Disc Golf Course. This may include irrigation modifications, additional trees, building upgrades, and naturalized landscaping. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 7 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 17 Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design Requested Funding: $75,000 Restroom safety and vandalism present ongoing problems in city parks, especially the large, heavily used parks. Friends of Fairmont Park and other stakeholders have raised this issue with Parks officials for some time. Friends of Fairmont invited Parks to present ideas about restroom design on January 11, 2022 and dialogue occurred regarding new designs that could reduce vandalism. We have identified a key design flaw with how restrooms in the Parks are configured, and that if addressed, can significantly reduce (but sadly not eliminate) problems. The Fairmont Park Restroom Pilot CIP for 2022-23 proposes a (1) planning study to update planning guidance for parks restroom policy and practice, (2) conceptual design for a new restroom to be tested in Fairmont Park. It is expected that the new design strategy will reduce vandalism and maintenance costs and increase restroom uptime and safety. The intent is to benchmark a proposed new restroom configuration against the current design in other parks, to test the viability of this approach, developing best practice in park restroom management. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18 Madsen Park Improvements Requested Funding: $500,000 This project seeks to improve Madsen Park by increasing activation through improving existing structures and adding new amenities in order to encourage more visitation. The surrounding area is planned to increase in population from apartments on and near North Temple. The improvements at the park would improve the quality of life for all area residents. Improvements include installation of new lighting, playground renewal, installation of a fenced dog park, benches, a small pavilion, seating and signage. Note that this park was selected a District Two location to receive funding from the voter-approved Parks, Trails, & Open Space Bond -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19 Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities Requested Funding: $855,000 This project will fund construction for restoring the courts and adding amenities at the Fire Station No. 7 Tennis Park on 300 North (west of 1000 West). This space is currently two failed tennis courts. One tennis court will be restored and the other will be converted into two pickleball courts. The addition of two pickleball courts is necessary to meet increasing demand for usable pickleball courts throughout the city. There are currently no dedicated pickleball courts on the westside. This project would also complete associated amenities on site as funding is available such as court lighting, drinking fountains, and ADA access. Public Lands is funding the design of the courts which will be completed in early 2023. This funding will go towards construction costs of the courts and other associated amenities. 438,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 438,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 416,150$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 8 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 20 337 Park Development Requested Funding: $550,000 337 Pocket Park was initially established as a community garden, but has since been decommissioned as such due to adjacent higher density property development to the south shading out agricultural potential. The parcel has since been sitting vacant. This potential pocket park needs significant development in order to add public land level of service to District 4. Funding would facilitate public engagement, planning and design, and construction of the site. This project is an expansion of a previously submitted constituent CIP application during the FY22-23 cycle with the addition of Public Lands-supported direction for implementation. Currently, a small portion of the parcel (nearest to 400 East) has public art and plantings. This project would develop the remainder of the parcel. Potential amenities and features of this site will be determined with public engagement but could include an off-leash dog park, seating, and native plantings appropriate for shaded areas. This property has been the subject of continuous encroachments since the lot to the south of this parcel has been under development. There have been inquiries about the 337 Park lot being reduced to allow for access to the southern development. Because of the increased interest in this lot and the threat to this valuable property in a low level-of-service area for parks, it is critical for the development of this lot to move forward as quickly as possible. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 9 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 21 Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements Requested Funding: $840,000 There is a great need for improvements along Rose Park Ln. This project would fund replacement of the failed trail, new and modified irrigation, and two solar feedback speed limit signs. The Urban Forestry division has committed to providing trees and installation at the new sites on Rose Park Lane. The trail work would allow for significantly more trees in this area and would contribute overall to a much more beautiful space. The entire stretch of Rose Park Ln is currently covered in weeds and highly neglected. Part of it was irrigated 4-5 years ago for the WestPointe run off ditch (large grassy area/detention basin at the corner of Rose Park Ln and 1700N), but this irrigation was never extended for the remainder of that stretch of road. This lane is highly visible from I-215 with large volumes of traffic going to the beautiful soccer fields just a few feet up the road. This has increased the traffic and speed of that traffic on Rose Park Ln. Safety is an issue as cars will continue to use highway speeds down that road upward of 60 MPH. I believe that fixing the trail, planting trees with irrigation, and erecting visible solar speed limit signs on Rose Park Ln would greatly improve community morale and safety for the families that walk with their children and pets, and bike and run on this trail. Adding trees and speed limit signs will also help in reducing air pollution, high summer heat and traffic noise. I recommend solar radar feedback speed limit signs to help slow down the traffic - one sign after the 2100N Exit just beyond the RAC entrance of the RAC, and the other sign at 1700N entrance. This area has been highly neglected for the last 17 years and continues to see more and more traffic with less and less help or attention in the way of beatification of a vital and thriving neighborhood. The $30,000 is for two driver feedback speed signs. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 22 Richmond Park Community Playground Requested Funding: $530,000 This project will replace one of the oldest playgrounds in the city located at Richmond Park. Utilizing the existing playground space, this project would create two play areas to cater towards younger and older children. This playground would utilize larger equipment with more features to create more potential for play and a higher level of service. The playground will incorporate accessible design to be friendly and usable by a diversity of users of all abilities. This project also includes removal and replacement of safety surfacing throughout the playground site. The new community playground will provide an inviting and engaging place for the Central City community to play while supporting resident health and wellness. This community currently has the lowest level of park service in our city and will significantly benefit from increased amenities. This playground will further activate the park by adding in a place for children to play while adults utilize the community garden. Public Lands has over 70 playgrounds, and this project would address one of the highest needs in our system. The CIP funding can be combined with the Council District Four reimagine neighborhood parks funding from the voter approved Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 212,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 10 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 23 Rose Park Lane Open Space and Trail Connection Study Requested Funding: $140,000 In summer 2022, City Council approved the rezone of four Public Lands parcels on Rose Park Lane to Open Space. This project seeks funding to conduct a planning, engagement, and conceptual design process on these four parcels, totaling approximately 3.6 acres, for a new park/open space. This will include evaluating different uses on site and conducting studies on completing the trail connection through the open space. There is currently no sidewalk through these parcels, and there are no other amenitized park spaces that directly service this neighborhood. This project would fund initial studies to better inform a next phase for design and construction of the open space. This project is closely connected to the application "Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements" which would complete landscaping and trail improvements on the trail leading to the open space. This project also builds on Public Land's current work to demolish the abandoned house on the property which is a very high priority for the Westpointe community. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24 Jefferson Park Improvements Requested Funding: $530,000 Jefferson Park is an under-resourced jewel in the Ballpark Neighborhood. This application seeks to address long standing issues identified in the City’s Ballpark Station Area Plan, including “a lack of service and proper maintenance in current parks”. The City and our residents have been discussing ways to improve the park for years. The City notes that our neighborhood is “underserved for parks and open space” and given the move to increase the density of housing in the area, we can only anticipate more stressors. It is time to preserve and improve what we already have. The park currently has a small, aging playground with two benches, a set of temporary soccer nets, and an off leash dog area. We request the following: Safety improvements: Ample, attractive 'dark sky' lighting throughout the perimeter of the park and fencing around the playground area. Given the area’s crime, this is essential. Health improvements: Permanent, attractive garbage cans along the perimeter of the park to reduce the constant flow of garbage (including clothing, needles and human waste), and to encourage responsible dog ownership. Activation improvements: The retention pond berm is an ideal location for a walking path around the park and provide residents a place to exercise. Adding a few benches (with garbage cans) under the existing shade trees, like in Liberty Park, will encourage activation. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 530,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 11 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 25 Parks Bilingual Signage Installation Requested Funding: $414,000 This project will replace existing signage and add new bilingual signage in English and Spanish in approximately ten parks citywide. This project will be the second phase of implementation of the City's new multi-lingual signage standards. The standards were completed in early 2022, with the first phase of implementation occurring in 2022 and early 2023. The first phase of implementation included these ten parks: Westpointe Park, Sunnyside Park, Pioneer Park, City Creek Park, Poplar Grove Park, Cottonwood Park, Rotary Glen/Donner Trail Park, Jordan Park, Riverside Park, Liberty Park. These parks were initially chosen because they are classified as Community Parks in the Public Lands Master Plan, have numerous and varying amenities, and lack effective signage types and locations currently. Currently, many parks, natural areas and public spaces are not adequately signed for appropriate and effective communication of public lands' regulations, assets, amenities, and stories. This project would not only add signage to parks with outdated or inadequate signage, but would add bilingual information on all signs in order to enhance communication and provide public lands information more equitably and reliably throughout Salt Lake City. The project will also help the City accomplish the goals of the recently-adopted Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. While some of these parks are classified as Neighborhood Parks, their size and varying amenities necessitate the need for the addition of multiple signs that are not currently present in the park. 82,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 331,200$ 82,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 331,200$ 26 Fairpark Traffic Circle Construction Phase Requested Funding: $497,000 1000 West is an important street for the Fairpark neighborhood and access to the Utah State Fairpark. Over the last two years, Salt Lake City Transportation Division has engaged with the community about the challenges and opportunities on 1000 West. Common requests for changes to 1000 West include slowing vehicle speeds, making the crosswalks safer, improving street aesthetics, and balancing regional access needs with neighborhood livability. This application is requesting funds to build a traffic circle at the intersection of 1000 West and 500 North. This application is related to one submitted for FY23, that awarded funds for study/design only. The Transportation Division is actively working on the study/design while supporting this application for construction funds. Intersection upgrades at 500 North is consistent with the 1000 West Corridor Plan, which seeks to moderate vehicle speeds, improve walkability, add landscaping, and create a gateway feature for the neighborhood. -$ -$ 497,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 497,000$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 12 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 27 North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements Requested Funding: $495,111 We are in need of many improvements in the area to make residents, workers and visitors feel safe and welcomed, and for ease of getting to work safely and efficiently. In addition, there is another emotional need that enhances people's sense of enjoyment and quality of life for both residents and visitors. These much needed enhancements include pedestrian safety improvements to include, but not limited to: 1. Pedestrian-scale, decorative lighting on 800 West from North Temple to dead end at approximately 150 South. 2. Potential for raised crosswalks, RRFB(s), or other enhanced pedestrian crossing features 3. ADA/sidewalk improvements as needed. The Secondary goal, which fulfills emotional needs of the community and quality of life, would be to activate park blocks, including but not limited to: 1. Amenities / improvements for southern three park blocks, which includes the two closest to Folsom Trail and the third (southern-most) at the dead end, which in theory has the lowest volume vehicle traffic, (between 800 W. from North Temple to dead end at approximately 150 S.). Park amenities could include: Benches, Bike racks, Interactive kids’ features, Climbable public artwork, Other public artwork (Arts Council has agreed to work with team and carry out City’s public art process for commission if any public artwork funding is awarded). These improvements to 800 West will make it feel welcoming, inclusive, and safe, especially after dark. These improvements will also support activating an arts centered, vibrant Westside neighborhood. The CIP funding can be combined with the $5 million to complete the Folsom Trail from the first issuance of the voter approved Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 192,689$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28 Alleyway Improvements 2023/2024 Requested Funding: $250,000 This annual program, kicked off in 2021, funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as necessary. -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 13 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 29 Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension Requested Funding: $1,148,771 Originally constructed in 1994, Fire Station #1 was built to house the resources (both human and mechanical) that were in use at the time. Since then, much of our apparatus and equipment needs at this strategic location have changed, requiring additional space. Fire Station #1 is located at 211 South 500 East. The call volume for this station is consistently the highest in the city and has been steadily increasing over the past five years. In fact, it recently came to the attention of SLCFD Administration that the current call volume and projected increase would be unsustainable for the single fire engine that was housed there. In response, the Administration made the data-based decision to reassign existing resources within the City, in an effort to alleviate the pressure on the fire crews operating out of Station 1 Specifically, a fire truck was moved from Fire Station #5 to Fire Station #1, essentially repurposing Fire Station #1 to what is known in the industry as a “dual-company house.” While this reassignment of resources has certainly shown a more balanced delivery of emergency services, there are logistical limitations affecting the housing of the newly assigned aerial apparatus. The three newest and most advanced trucks are too long to be housed in the apparatus bays at Fire Station #1. We have implemented the use of an older, shorter aerial apparatus. In the meantime, we await the construction of a new, smaller in length truck (not a standard build) which is anticipated to take 3-4 years. There is uncertainty that the manufacturer will be able to build this length of truck in the future. As such, it is requested that funding be made available to design and construct the expansion of four (4) apparatus bays at Fire Station #1. 1,148,771$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,148,771$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY24 Requested Funding: $1,700,000 Following a 10-year plan to eliminate the $45,600,000 in deferred asset renewal, the Facilities Division will utilize the funds requested to replace assets that are beyond their useful life, prioritizing assets based on their criticality. 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 14 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 31 Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program Requested Funding: $750,000 The Streets Division, part of Public Services will be the project sponsor and implementation manager. Streets is requesting to begin a Mill & Overlay pilot program, which is a more robust form of roadway surface treatment. Many existing city roadways do not currently need a full depth reconstruction but are not in good enough condition for current maintenance surface treatments, namely chip and slurry seal. If nothing is done, these roads will deteriorate rapidly and soon require expensive reconstruction. The Mill & Overlay program would allow Streets to perform maintenance on these roads at a lower cost. These roads would also then be eligible for chip & slurry surface treatments a few years down the road. The combination of the Mill & Overlay program with chip and slurry surface treatments would put off the need for full depth reconstruction of eligible roads for many years to come, saving the City money and increasing the quality of City roadways. To carry out this pilot program Streets needs two additional pieces of equipment, an Asphalt Paver, and a Cold-Milling Machine. These machines would also assist in other maintenance the division performs, as currently a cold milling machine is rented for four months each year (when available) at an annual cost of $70,000. -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ 32 Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 Requested Funding: $150,000 Design and construction of City staff recommendations on the project area’s six local streets: Hollywood Avenue, Ramona Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Lincoln Street, 1000 East, and McClelland Street. Continued funding on partially funded CCIP, Sugar House Safe Side Streets, from FY 21/22. The Salt Lake City Transportation Division has conducted a series of sessions with residents and worked with a contracted Fehr & Peers consultant team. A recommendations document with a draft traffic calming treatment design has been created and shared with residents. This CCIP request seeks to fill the funding gap between what has been awarded in previous years and what is required to complete the infrastructure recommended for implementation in the plan. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 15 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 33 Historic Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at International Peace Gardens Requested Funding: $325,000 The International Peace Gardens in District 2 receives hundreds of visitors per day but contains much tired and dilapidated garden architecture. Hollows left by stolen plaques and artwork everywhere remind visitors of theft and vandalism and limit their understanding of the history and cultures behind the 28 national garden exhibits. CIP funding is needed to replace or replicate, conserve, and conceive a plan and trust fund for future upkeep of this trove of art, ethnic and botanic diversity. Specific projects are listed in the budget narrative and will be completed in priority order, if funded. Additionally, if funding is leveraged by other sources, this funding would be used to complete additional projects. The types of projects include: Security/GPS tracking chips for each asset, conservation and restoration artworks, design and replacement of artwork that has been removed/stolen, replacement of perennial botanicals and landscaping, structural study and design exploring expansion of the greenhouse while assessing the feasibility of a visitor space/exhibition space. 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 34 Fred and Ila Rose Wetland Preserve Improvements Requested Funding: $361,073 Improved public access for intended non-consumptive nature users through 1) the installation of boulder manways at all three entrances, 2) complete removal of dysfunctional Preserve-long split-rail fencing, 3) complete removal of rock-filled gabion baskets at both pond-side access points, and 4) creation of sloped cracked gravel beaches at both pondside access points. Installation of low fencing to newly installed manways to help limit access to the Preserve at its two entrances at 1100 West. Installation of a low gate at its northwest entrance to allow for occasional needed operations and maintenance by authorized vehicles. Design and installation of a trash-rack in front of the wetland pond outlet to facilitate water exchange while still allowing in-and-out migration of Jordan River wildlife, especially fishes. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 16 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 35 75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement Requested Funding: $400,000 Upgrade an aging traffic signal, along with parts of the surrounding intersection, with safety and operational improvements for all modes. The typical life of a traffic signal is 30 years. After that age, frequent repairs are needed, and the structural supports for the traffic signal may be at risk of failing. Twenty traffic signals in Salt Lake City are over 40 years old, with some of them rapidly approaching 75 years old. This project will fund the design and construction to replace one of the oldest and/or poorest condition traffic signals in Salt Lake City. The project will replace and upgrade the signal with new steel poles, signal heads, and detection, including current best practices for pedestrian detection and design, pedestrian countdown timers, and motor vehicle left turn phasing, as needed. It is anticipated that a traffic signal along 1300 East near the University of Utah will be selected. Those traffic signals were constructed in 1948. -$ -$ 360,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$ -$ -$ 360,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$ 36 Park Strip, Median, Park Irrigation / Water Reduction Strategy and Implementation Requested Funding: $500,000 This project will explore different methods of transforming our medians, park strips, and non-active park spaces to reduce the amount of water use in these areas not used for active play. Our park strips, parks, and medians have a lot of grass in them and we would like to have a consultant look at some areas in the City and explore different alternatives to grass or different varieties of grass that will reduce our water consumption. We would then use project funding to be able to change several of these areas and help the City become a leader in transforming these types areas to a better use of water in the City. There are a lot of park strips in the City that are hard to irrigate, so let's try and turn them into something that saves water and is still user friendly. We could also look at areas to be more of a pollinator gardens to benefit the environment while being pleasing to the eye. We would like to research what would be sustaining in our environment while not being a burden on maintenance. It could be mulch, rock, different grasses the sky is the limit. Let us be the innovators and help the City overcome our water woes one park strip at a time. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 17 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 37 Liberty and Jordan Parks Greenhouses - Revisioned Requested Funding: $242,823 Salt Lake City’s greenhouses located in Liberty (LPG) and Jordan (JPG) Parks are showing signs of aging requiring repair and renovation to ensure they continue to support the community’s horticultural, biodiversity, and conservation interests. Part 1 – Structural audits of both facilities are planned to identify the type and extent of repairs needed in order to ensure safe working conditions, compliance with statutory regulations, and enhancing the building’s life cycle by identifying both preventative and corrective actions to secure the properties. Part 2 – Examines to what degree the current structure and any proposed renovations support LPG’s and JPG’s mission statements. Part 2 includes a marketing study to identify a) options to extend mission statements to include innovative programs/activities of interest to the general public and/or that support the development of new collaborative partnerships with other horticultural institutions, and b) identify how to ‘scale up’ select activities/programs (e.g., aid municipalities to promote biodiversity/sustainability) to address conservations interests of a broader set of constituents in order to generate (consultation) self- supporting revenues. Part 3 – Develops a plan, budget, and timetable to conduct a collegiate case competition (in collaboration with the University of Utah’s College of Architecture and Planning) to review/evaluate technical and aesthetic proposals to guide LPG renovations per historical guidelines/updated mission. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 38 First Encampment Park Requested Funding: $125,500 The Park is 26 years old & upgrades & improvements are needed to improve safety & ensure continued usage. Goals include mending and upgrading the sprinkler system and incorporating drip systems to reduce water waste & rock erosion; improving drainage in the dry 'riverbed' to reduce standing water issues; adding motion sensor lighting to improve safety and discourage criminal activity; repairing damaged monuments to improve the perception that the park is valued; replanting water-wise vegetation that has eroded to improve visibility within the park; adding a more visible park sign; adding historical placards with added context; repairing engraved pioneer names damaged by water on the rocks to ensure continued historical value and work with new Park Rangers to share & modernize accessible historical information. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 18 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 39 Indiana Avenue Area - Transit & Trail Connections Requested Funding: $162,500 In October, the Salt Lake City Council approved The Other Side Village (TOSV) pilot project, a tiny home community just west of Redwood Road on Indiana Avenue. Also just west of Redwood Road, the Wallace Stegner Academy (WSA) charter school, Riverbend Sports and Events Complex, and Vincit Amor Event Center are all attracting families and individuals to the evolving, formerly- industrial area. This request for design funding will follow on a Transportation Division study, currently in progress, that is assessing the feasibility, recommended phasing, and cost estimates for a suite of projects on either side of Redwood Road, between 400 S and California Ave. This proposal seeks funds for the design and permitting of three key elements to connect TOSV, WSA, and other destinations to walking, biking, and transit options, and to existing infrastructure such as the 9-Line Trail, a new transit hub opening in early 2023 at Orange Street / 500 S, and sidewalks on Redwood Road. • The design and environmental assessment / permitting of a multi-use trail connection between The Other Side Village development and the new transit hub. • The possible location of one or more GREENbike stations connecting the village, the transit center, and bus stops along Redwood Road. • The design of a signalized crossing of Redwood Road at either Redwood Depot Lane (~950 S) and Redwood Rd or 1040 South and Redwood Road. The final location will be decided in discussion with UDOT. This signal may be a pedestrian and bicycle signal, or a full traffic signal. Future funds will be sought for construction. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40 Multimodal Capital Maintenance Requested Funding: $200,000 These funds are for hiring contractors for specialized maintenance of infrastructure for which SLC does not have the equipment or staff. Examples: enhanced crosswalks, bike lanes, bike racks, colored pavement, delineators, radar speed feedback signs, pedestrian warning flashers, bike racks, etc. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding Requested Funding: $4,000,000 This project will complete the last half mile of a 4.6 mile 700 South reconfiguration from 25 Ft wide deteriorated asphalt road to a 50 FT wide concrete street with bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage from Redwood Rd to 5600 West. Additional funding is needed to complete the package for multiple reasons: a water main 1,300 feet long is required to be replaced ($650,000); Styrofoam fill was proposed to mitigate settlement over the water main as a cost savings method, however that proposal was rejected; Union Pacific changed the City cost of the rail crossing from $400,000 to $1,200,000; inflation has driven up the cost of construction. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 19 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 42 800 S 1000 E Crosswalk Upgrade Requested Funding: $336,500 Every day throughout the day many parents, children and volunteers at Rowland Hall, as well as students and families attending Judge Memorial and East High, cross the busy intersection of 800 South 1000 East in conditions that are very dangerous. We are asking for a HAWK style crosswalk system to replace the existing rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) at this busy intersection. We suggest moving the RRFBs to the next crosswalk to the west, at Lincoln St 800 South. In addition, the 1000 East crosswalk is in disrepair and we request it be replaced with a colored concrete crosswalk. Drivers of vehicles speed up and down 800 South. The road has two lanes in each direction, eastbound and westbound left turn lanes, and a deteriorated 4-foot median on the intersection's east side. This crosswalk is also at the bottom of a hill that encourages westbound speeding and challenges sightlines from both directions. Currently, there is a tree blocking visibility for the cars driving westbound. There have been many near misses as children cross one side in safety, only to be stranded in the middle of the street as drivers from the other side blow through the intersection unaware that a student has started to cross. Given all of these factors, a more visible way to highlight pedestrians crossing the street, and ensure student and adult safety would be greatly appreciated. We are asking for a HAWK style crosswalk system to better protect children and families, moving the existing RRFBs to the next crosswalk to the west (Lincoln St 800 South), and replacing the deteriorated crosswalk with a colored concrete crosswalk -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 43 Central 9th Streetscape Improvements Requested Funding: $85,000 The Central 9th Community Council is seeking CIP Funds to purchase and install nine commercial trash receptacles to be located on 900 S, between West Temple and 300 W. We are also seeking funding for banner arms to be attached to the street lighting on 900 S between West Temple and 300 W and 200 W between 800 S and the 900 S freeway off-ramp for Central 9th branding banners. Also we would like laser cut C9 logos to be attached to benches and planters along public spaces on 900 S between West Temple and 200 W as well as 200 W between 800 S and the 900 S freeway off-ramp. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 20 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 44 Sugar House Community Map Project Requested Funding: $93,400 Maps present information about the world in a simple, visual way. They are living documents that inform, direct, and recognize a community’s open spaces, historic buildings, public services, and points of interest. Sugar House is a special community—a true inner-city that balances the needs of residents, visitors, merchants, vendors, families, students, and others unlike any other region in Salt Lake City. Strategically placed maps throughout Sugar House would inform and direct pedestrians and cyclists, identify key locations in the community, provide specific branding for Sugar House, and showcase pride for the sweetest neighborhood in Utah. The Sugar House Community Map Project will install eight (8) outdoor maps in the community. The maps will detail assets, historic landmarks, public works, open spaces, places of interest, and walking/biking paths. In addition, each map will include a QR code to connect with the Sugar House Business Alliance. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45 Phase I: Plaza 349 Life Safety, Security, and HVAC Upgrades Requested Funding: $2,000,000 Plaza 349 is critical to the day to day operations of the city by hosting several key departments including: Human Resources (HR), Engineering, Information Management Services (IMS), Transportation, and Building Inspection divisions. The city has commissioned a space planning and vulnerability study which identified key elements to be updated including life safety, access controls, and security. Facilities department has also identified key assets, including HVAC system and parking structure, that require updating to ensure operation. This CIP application is for the first phase of the project and will include upgrading life safety, access controls, security, HVAC design, and key HVAC asset upgrades. The estimated cost of the first phase is $2 million. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 46 Implementation of Safety Enhancements West Side Foothill Drive Requested Funding: $494,126 Building safer intersections for pedestrians and cyclists at major Foothill Drive intersections. In 2017 the Foothill Drive Implementation Strategy was completed with community input and professional planners. Since then little has been done to address the safety issues and solutions suggested in the plan. Residents and users of this corridor are seeking funds to implement changes along the west side at intersections between Bryan Avenuye and 2600 East.The most important intersection is 2500 East and Blaine Avenue near the Beacon Heights Elementary School. The $170,000 is for Blaine Avenue and 2500 East. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 170,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 21 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 47 Reimagining 4th & 4th (4th West & 4th North) Requested Funding: $100,000 4th (N) & 4th (W) is a critical piece of the Capitol Hill-Marmalade neighborhood infrastructure. A redesign of the intersection and the evolving 400 N and 400 W corridors has the potential to connect residents and visitors with the rich social infrastructure of the neighborhood. The proposed study is intended to create and improve community gathering places and develop safe, efficient, green, and pleasing neighborhood-wide connections for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and vehicle drivers. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 48 11th Ave Park Pavilion, Trees, and Benches Requested Funding: $533,165 Install a new medium sized pavilion for shade and provide a gathering place for families, friends and neighbors. It will be located near the sports fields and north of the parking area, and would be large enough for six picnic tables and provide space for several groups to gather in the shade. Seating: The views from 11th Avenue Park are outstanding, however, there are few places to sit. Seating would be added at the top of the two slopes and adjacent to looped path. Backless benches will allow for viewing either the sports fields, the tennis or the valley below. Landscape enhancements: Increase the number of shade trees in the area near the playground, pavilion, and sports fields. Increased shade will offer refuge for spectators and families with small children. It is also critical to have trees of different age classes to create a healthy urban forest. Concrete Pad: With destination level recreation amenities there is a need to provide restrooms during the peak-use seasons. Seasonal demand can be met with portable units. A concrete pad near the entrance would make the park more usable for all who use the park. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 49 New Liberty Park Crosswalks and Trails Requested Funding: $262,000 Two proposed crosswalks across 500 E along with new sidewalks connecting to the Liberty Park sidewalk loop. One crosswalk would connect Edith Ave to Liberty Park, and one would connect Williams Ave to Liberty Park. These new crosswalks would benefit the local community by a) increasing pedestrian access to Salt Lake City’s flagship park, b) reducing speed on 500 E by adding visual friction to the road, and c) improving pedestrian safety by allowing people to avoid crossing at busy intersections. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 22 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 50 Sunnyside and Arapeen Signal & Safety Improvements Requested Funding: $450,000 The intersection at Sunnyside/Arapeen represents a significant impediment to traffic entering the Research Park area and creates traffic congestion that impacts the neighborhood adjacent to Sunnyside Avenue and to Foothill Drive. This volume of left-turning traffic would justify adding a new left-turn lane. Additionally, the 9-Line Trail (Sunnyside Trail) is on the north side of the roadway, and vehicles that make a westbound to northbound left-turn conflict with trail users in an unsafe manner. This project seeks to address these issues through the use of a technology called a "Flex Lane". This relatively new signal technology would allow one of the westbound through lanes to be converted to a shared left-through lane during this morning rush hour, resulting in less congestion and less frustration for residents in the area. In this way, we can use technology to avoid widening the roadway for a dual left and maximize the facility we already have. This technology has recently been employed by UDOT at the intersection of South Temple / State Street for people making a southbound left turn and has resulted in improved conditions in that area. The added benefit of this change would be that we could modify the signal phasing so that when the trail through traffic has a green light, no left turns are permitted. When the left turning traffic has a green arrow, trail users would be stopped. We are also planning some additional bike infrastructure at the intersection. In order to complete this project, it would be necessary to completely rebuild the signal as well as the pavement in the intersection, which is in a failed condition. The project is also planned to include several complete street enhancements to the crosswalks and bike lanes at the intersection. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 51 Wasatch Hollow Park: Engagement, Planning & Restoration Requested Funding: $500,000 The Wasatch Hollow Community Council (WHCC) has been collaborating with SLC Public Lands regarding critical improvements to Wasatch Hollow Park. As a response to growing concerns about safety, degradation of the park, and non- compliance with posted off-leash dog guidelines, SLC Public Lands conducted a survey in August of residents. The survey sought input on off-leash dog use and other activities at the park, with the goal of serving a diverse and inclusive community of park users. The WHCC is considering the survey results and other community inputs, and intends to submit recommendations to the City. This project would fund a planning and engagement process at Wasatch Hollow park to identify capital improvements that are well supported by the surrounding community and address existing challenges at the park, specifically related to off- leash dogs and activation. The resulting plan is expected to include recommendations for better separation of the off-leash dog area and the creation of other active and passive use areas where dogs are not allowed to be off-leash, new landscaping and restoration of the field. Remaining funding would then be used for design and construction of plan recommendations. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 23 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 52 Hansen Ave - West Entrance/Exit Requested Funding: $470,703 Purchase a small portion of private property at approximately 400 West Hansen Ave to create a second (west) access point for Hansen Ave. Initial contact with the property owner indicates that they would be amenable to having the conversation about selling this property. Would include upgrading the property to City standards for a public road. This would convert this current street from a dead end street to one with two access points. There would be many benefits both public and private for this change. As detailed later in this application in more detail. A brief overview is as follows: Currently Hansen Ave (1650 South 300 West) enters and exists about 120 feet from a very busy intersection - 1700 South/300 West. This creates a lot of congestion along with several other problems. Emergency vehicle (Fire trucks/ambulances) access would be significantly improved. City Maintenance (snowplowing) would be significantly improved. Garbage collection would be significantly improved. Freight and package delivery for the existing businesses and the soon to be 175 new residents would significantly improved. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 53 Nevada Street Reconstruction Requested Funding: $479,000 Rebuild Nevada St running from Redondo Ave north to Garfield. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 54 Sunnyside Pickleball Courts Requested Funding: $500,000 Idea 1 - Sunnyside 4/6 Pickleball courts at Sunnyside Park on 800 South. Like to incorporate the best elements of all the pickle courts that I have visited in the SLC area. Ideal court location would be just south of the existing pavilion near the parking lot. This an older affluent area that would benefit from the following elements: Tall perimeter fencing to retain the ball within the courts, short fencing separating the internal courts, Sitting or bench area, covered, Night Lights, Flagging above to shade from sun, Paddle Rack system (like Fairnont court), Placard/signage that describes court rules, Court location will not infringe on the 3 existing large fields on the west side of the park used for football and lacrosse, nor the baseball fields on the north side, New Courts in this location will require: Removal of the vollyeball standards, never used, Removal or replanting of trees... Planting should be planted to strategically create shade for waiting players -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Requested Funding: $351,000 Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west side of road on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 24 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 56 Salt Lake City Pétanque Requested Funding: $500,000 I was National champion in a sport called petanque in 2019. Our national organization wanted us to put out bids. So I did and they got rejected as we don't have a facility to hold national tournaments. We are a growing sport and even had a medal winner on the last world games in Atlanta. What we ask for is a venue so we can practice. That way we can get national tournaments to Salt lake City. In almost every park, we see bocce courts but I never seen any bocce players. We are starting to grow as a sport and would love to have our own location. This project is proposing the addition of 16 Petanque courts, along with shade structures and seating at Rosewood Park. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 57 Ensign Peak Nature Park Improvements Requested Funding: $210,000 Ensign Nature Park attracts thousands of visitors at all hours of day and night. However, the park was not designed to handle the volume of traffic it receives, and it shows; the park lacks adequate facilities for visitors (no water or bathrooms), has heavily eroded trails and is not designed to manage the visitor volume. The increase in popularity of the park in recent years has come at considerable cost to the residents in the area - traffic, noise, littering and crime. Most of this adverse impact to the community is at night. The goal of this project is to reduce the impact to the community and be a first step towards enabling the park to be improved over the long-term. Before any other improvements can be sustainably made to the park, we need to limit late night access to the park, for the following reasons: 1) The impact on the community is severe - the late night crowd is loud - drinking, playing loud music, driving loudly, etc at all hours of the day -- it is common for significant numbers of people to be there even at 3am. They frequently leave beer bottles, fast food containers and other trash on neighboring lawns. 2) Public safety - there have been dangerous fires caused by night time visitors to the park at least twice, and firearms have been discharged at least twice in the last 2 years in the area by nighttime visitors. I propose we address this by building a fence with a full-height turn-locking turnstile and ADA gate at the park entrance, so the park can be locked between hours that the city and community agree is reasonable. Many residents in the area are willing to be volunteers to help with unlocking and locking the gate at night, and generally be stewards of the park. Improved lighting and landscaping in this area will further deter after-hours activity. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 210,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 58 11th Avenue Park Pickleball Expansion Requested Funding: $502,500 Expand 11th Avenue Park pickleball courts by 4 more pickleball courts (6 current dedicated courts to a total of 10 dedicated courts), with fencing. This proposal also includes creating lines on the 2 tennis courts closest to the pickleball courts to be used by pickleball players if all pickleball courts are in use. This project also includes new signage: number the courts; queuing expectations and paddle holders; court rules. -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 25 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees 1/4 Cent Sales Tax Class C (gas tax) Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Council Funding Allocations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks Impact Fees #Project Description Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations General Fund Funding Our Future Transportation Dedicated Sources 59 Westside Art Project Requested Funding: $150,000 Not presented to CDCIP Board. Could be combined with or separate from the $150,000 for new art in the 9-Line RDA Project Area which was approved as part of the FY2024 annual budget. -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 60 Maintenance of Vacant City-owned Property Requested Funding: $500,000 Not presented to CDCIP Board. $200,000 is separately approved with the annual budget for security and utilities at vacant City-0wned properties. The Council approved $700,000 last fiscal year of which $598,698 remains available. The Administration identified five projects with a total cost of $550,000 to use the FY2023 funding. Projects have not yet been identified for the $500,000 in new funding for FY2024 (would not lapse to Fund Balance). The five projects using the FY2023 funds are: - $100,000 at the Former Public Safety Building (PSB) - $200,000 for a Development Strategy and Spacing Needs Study - $100,000+ additional Funding for Major Renovations to the Annex building Leased by Odyssey House - $100,000 for Maintenance of City-owned Buildings Leased to Third Parties - $50,0000 for Pre-development Work at the Fleet Block and former Public Safety Building (PSB) 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 61 Urban Trails Maintenance Requested Funding: $200,000 Not presented to CDCIP Board. Proposed as a new item that would be base funding ongoing annually. These funds will be used for repaving, crack and seal repair, bridge re-decking, bridge replacements, trail shoulder surfacing, snow removal, debris removal on urban paved trails. Project locations include the Jordan River Parkway, 9Line Trail, Folsom Trail. Short description: These funds will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain urban trails and trail segments that potentially come online during the fiscal year. The maintenance of these trails is necessary to keep them safe for all that use them and so they can be used year-round -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ 8,284,921$ 3,240,000$ 7,700,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$ 8,899,610$ 3,884,126$ 7,700,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$ AVAILABLE FUNDING BY SOURCE 8,484,921$ 3,240,000$ 7,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$ 8,899,610$ 3,884,126$ 7,700,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$ AVAILABLE FUNDING LESS TOTALS 200,000$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Note: Council changes to funding and project descriptions / scopes are shown in blue TOTALS Exhibit A - Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Allocations Funding Log Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 26 Approved As To Form Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date ______________________________ Sign ______________________________ Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION NO._________OF 2023 (Adopting Capital Improvement Program Allocations for fiscal year 2023-2024.) A resolution adopting the attached Capital Improvement Program Allocations for the fiscal year 2023-2024. WHEREAS, pursuant to Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) adopted a final budget for the Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”) fiscal year 2023-2024; and WHEREAS, the budget adopted by the City included a budget for the capital improvement program; and WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to formalize the appropriations for the capital improvement program. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt the capital improvement allocations for the City for fiscal year 2023-2024. SECTION 2. Adoption of Capital Improvement Allocations. The capital improvement allocations for fiscal year 2023-2024, which were included within the 2023-2024 budget, shall be and hereby are adopted according to the specific terms and conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 3. Public Inspection. The City budget officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file copies of these capital improvement program allocations in the office of said budget officer and in the office of the City Recorder, which allocations shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of _____________, 2023. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL _______________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 8/7/2023 2 _______________________________ CITY RECORDER Item F1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno Budget and Policy Analyst DATE:August 15, 2023 RE: Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund – Leavity LLC MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council adopt the ordinance approving a $100,000 loan for Leavity LLC, from the Economic Development Loan Fund. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance, and to proceed to the next agenda item. DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ERIN MENDENHALL MAYOR LORENA RIFFO JENSON DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL _______________________ Date Received: 7/18/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 7/18/2023 __________________________________________________________________ TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: July 14, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM:Jacob Maxwell, Deputy Director, Department of Economic Development SUBJECT:Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund (EDLF) Leavity LLC STAFF CONTACTS: Roberta Reichgelt, Business Development Director, Roberta.reichgelt@slcgov.com Peter Makowski, Project Manager, peter.makowski@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Loan Approval RECOMMENDATION: The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of $100,000 loan to Leavity LLC. BUDGET IMPACT:$100,000 from the Economic Development Loan Fund BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:On June 8, 2023, a loan request from Leavity LLC was presented to the EDLF Loan Committee for review and discussion. The Loan Committee voted to recommend the loan for City Council consideration. Leavity is a wholesale sourdough bread bakery. Basic Loan request Business Name: Leavity LLC Address: 47 S. Orange St, #B1, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Loan Amount Requested: $100,000 Loan Term: 7 years Interest Rate: 10.5% Use of Funds: Equipment Loan Type: Start up Reasoning behind staff recommendation Applicants of The Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) go through a thorough application process consisting of a pre-screening, underwriting analysis and economic impact statement. The Lisa Shaffer (Jul 18, 2023 15:28 MDT) loan applicant goes through these processes, then the loan is reviewed by the Loan Committee members. Upon the thorough review of the Loan Committee members, the Loan Committee votes whether to make a recommendation to the City Council. If so, the loan is transmitted to the Council for final approval. Because the Loan Committee review process must adhere to the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act (OPMA) is followed. In addition, the EDLF loans must meet the goals of the Economic Development Loan Fund as stated in the EDLF program guidelines. This loan meets the EDLF program guidelines in the following areas. 1. Increasing employment opportunities 2. Stimulating business development 3. Encouraging private investment 4. Enhancing neighborhood vitality and 5. Boosting commercial enterprise This loan will assist in the creation of 1 new job in the next year and retention of 1 current job. This loan was recommended by the EDLF Committee to the City Council for approval. EDLF Loan Balances 1. As reported from The Finance Department on June 30, 2023, the EDLF available fund balance: $8,691,138 2. The amount of outstanding loans total is: $2,256,763.51 EDLF Loan Committee There are a total of nine (9) EDLF Committee members. City Employees: 1. Community and Neighborhoods Finance 2. 3. Employee at large 4. Housing Stability 5. Economic Development Community Volunteers: 6. Business Advisory Board (BAB) member 7. Banker 8. Community lender 9. Business mentor Attachments: Ordinance and Terms Sheet LOAN TERM SHEET Applicant: Leavity LLC Address: 47 S Orange St., #B1, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Proposed Loan Terms Loan Amount: $100,000 Loan Term: 7 Years Interest Rate Calculation Prime Interest Rate: 7.50% (at the time of application on 1/6/2023) EDLF Charge: 4% Less Discount: 1% Priority Area - West of I-15 Final Interest Rate: 10.50% Use of Funds: Equipment, Working Capital Business Type: Food and Beverage Collateral and Guarantees: Equipment Personal Guarantees: Todd Bradley - Owner Conditions for Closing: Obtain all City approvals, execute all loan documents as deemed necessary by City legal counsel and DED staff, such other terms as recommended by City legal counsel and DED staff July 13, 2023 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY24 TO:City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards Budget and Policy Analysts DATE: August 15, 2023 RE: Budget Amendment Number 1 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 Budget Amendment Number One includes ten proposed amendments, ($2,139,398) in revenues and $14,892,993 in expenditures of which $250,000 is from General Fund Balance, requesting changes to five funds. Most expenses in this budget amendment are housekeeping items found in section D. The transmittal included a separate ordinance for item D-2 that would correct a fee in the Consolidated Fee Schedule or CFS. The budget amendment and the CFS amendment will be listed as two separate items with two separate ordinances and votes on a Council formal meeting agenda. Fund Balance If all the items are adopted as proposed, then General Fund Balance (including Funding Our Future) would be projected at 11.38% which is $7,190,963 below the 13% minimum target. The FY2024 annual budget had a projected Fund Balance slightly above 13% of ongoing General Fund revenues. The decrease from 13% to 11.38% is caused by an $8.5 million estimate of expense changes (e.g., prepaid expenses, accounts payable outstanding). This is shown in the Fund Balance projections table on page three of this staff report. The actual expense changes are pending confirmation by the annual financial audit which is typically completed in December. The Finance Department does an expense change projection each year using a conservative approach (estimates expenses on the high-end). The actual amount could vary from the $8.5 million estimate. Historically the amount has ranged from approximately $4 million to $8 million. The projected Fund Balance does not include unused FY2023 budgets that drop to Fund Balance at the end of the fiscal year. The General Fund typically sees $2 million to $3 million drop to Fund Balance annually, which would increase the fund balance percentage. It also does not include actual revenues through the end of the last fiscal year. Those amounts are confirmed by the annual financial audit. Policy Question: The Council may wish to ask the Administration for additional information about the $8.5 million of estimated expense changes and whether the estimates may have changed since the annual budget deliberations in May and June. Two Straw Poll Requests The Administration is requesting straw polls for two items: A-1 Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park ($218,000 to the CIP Fund), and A-2 Funding for fall 2023 Downtown Open Streets Initiative ($250,000 from the General Fund Balance). Additionally, the Council may wish to note that item A-3 is a request to refund Impact and Permit Fees for the Ivory University House which has a separate briefing and staff report. The total amount being refunded is approximately $2.4 million. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Project Timeline: Set Date: August 15, 2023 1st Briefing: August 15, 2023 Public Hearing: Sept. 5, 2023 2nd Briefing: Sept. 5 or 12, 2023 (if needed) Potential Action: Sept. 19, 2023 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2023-24 Budget Adjustments As this is the first budget amendment of the new fiscal year, there are no revenue projection updates to report at this time. Fund Balance Chart The Administration’s chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for BA#1. Based on those projections adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 11.38%. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment that reduces revenue by ($2,139,398) and new expenses of $14,892,993. The amendment proposes changes in five funds, with no increases in FTEs. The amendment also includes the use of $250,000 from the General Fund balance. The proposal includes ten initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget opening is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing Impact Fees Update The Administration’s transmittal provides an updated summary of impact fee tracking. The information is current as of 7/20/23. As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have no refunds during all of FY2024 and FY2025. The transportation section of the City’s Impact Fees Plan was updated in October 2020. The Administration is working on updates to the fire, parks, and police sections of the plan. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring Impact Fees Fire $273,684 More than two years away - Parks $16,793,487 More than two years away - Police $1,402,656 More than two years away - Transportation $6,304,485 More than two years away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract Section A: New Items (Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items) A-1: Donation for Northeast Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park ($218,000 Donation to the CIP Fund) The Council approved $300,000 of parks impact fees in FY2023 CIP to add four light poles and structures to the northeast ballfield at Riverside Park (the red marker in the below map). There are currently three baseball fields used by the leagues and a fourth practice field. This would be the first city-owned baseball field to receive lighting. The City received a donation of $218,000, which will allow the northwest ballfield to also be lit by the project. The total project budget would be $518,000. Straw Poll Request: The Administration requested a straw poll to allow for the receipt of the contract for the entire project. A-2: One-time Additional Funding for Fall 2023 Downtown Open Streets Events ($250,000 from General Fund Balance) The Council approved $500,000 in Budget Amendment #5 of FY2023 for downtown street enhanced activation over the 2023 summer. The Council re-appropriated the funds in the FY2024 annual budget and expanded the scope to include open streets events in the fall. This item is requesting an additional $250,000 for a total budget of $750,000. The additional funding would be used to purchase street infrastructure (e.g., bollards, Trax barriers, and parking signs) instead of renting it. The street infrastructure would be stored by the Streets Division when not in use. The Administration stated the street infrastructure would be available for other special events to use. The open streets event this fall would be shorter than the versions held over the summer the past few years. The events would be run for eight weeks instead of 15 weeks and not include Thursdays. The events would still be on Main Street from South Temple to 400 South. Main Street would be closed from Noon to 2am on Fridays and Saturdays. The events this fall would have enhanced activation and programming on every block including a “street market.” During the annual budget, the Council discussed how the end of temporary pandemic regulations made holding the open streets events more difficult such as permitting price and timing flexibility and loosening of outdoor dining and retail rules. The Administration stated a new permit was created to facilitate temporary extensions of premises during open streets events. Another adjustment is that the Economic Development Department is applying for the special event permit which includes taking on liability as the permit holder. The Downtown Alliance will continue to provide event management and support services. Policy Questions: ➢Calendar Year 2024 Open Streets Funding Needs – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how to coordinate funding and timing of potential downtown Open Streets events in 2024 and potential implementation of a permanent pedestrian mall on Main Street. A study is currently underway to provide options for creating a Main Street pedestrian mall downtown. The study results are expected to be available next year. The study website is available at https://open-main-street- deagis.hub.arcgis.com/ ➢Larger Activation and Programming Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what the larger activation and programming budget ($185,000 instead of $45,000) could be used for and what differences the public could see downtown. ➢City-owned Street Infrastructure Available to Other Special Events – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how the street infrastructure would be made available to other special events such as whether a first-come first served approach is used, and would the cost be at fair market rental values or discounted. ➢Permitting Changes and Liability – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether there are legislative changes to City Code or policies that could further facilitate open streets events. The Council may also wish to ask whether the event budget should include a line item for liability since the Economic Development Department is taking on that potential cost as the permit holder. ➢Coordination with 200 South Reconstruction Project – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the 200 South street reconstruction project could be an impediment to the fall open streets events as currently envisioned. A-3: Funding Impact Fees and Permit Fees Refund to Ivory University House ($754,483.23 from General Fund Balance and $1,648,715 from Impact Fees) A Public Benefits Analysis has been transmitted to the Council pertaining to the refunding of building permits and impact fees to Ivory University House L3C. The total amount being refunded is approximately $2.4 million. This amount consists of $754,483 in building permit fees and $1,648,715 in impact fees. Should the Public Benefits Analysis be approved by the Council, a budget will need to be in place for the refunds to happen. This will be accounted for by showing negative revenue for both the Impact Fees and Permit Fees being refunded. Staff note: This item is scheduled to have a separate Council briefing and staff report. The Administration transmitted a public benefits analysis separately from this budget amendment. The below tables are copied from the public benefits analysis showing a breakout of the impact fees and permit fees by type. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section (None) (None) Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section (None) (None) Section D: Housekeeping D-1: AFSCME MOU Allocations (Budget Neutral – reallocating existing $511,001 Non-departmental General Fund budget to the appropriate department budgets) This is a follow up housekeeping item from the adopted annual budget which included a $511,001 line item for salary adjustments based on the negotiated Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees or AFSCME local union. The proposal is to move the $511,001 out of Non- departmental and into the six department budgets with AFSCME represented employees. There wasn’t enough time between the conclusion of negotiations and Council adoption of the annual budget to include this breakout in the FY2024 Key Changes spreadsheet. AFSCME MOU Allocations – 911 Dispatch GF $104,175 AFSCME MOU Allocations – CAN GF $3,963 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Police GF $55,928 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Justice Courts GF $40 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Lands GF $36,737 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Services GF $310,158 D-2: Consolidated Fee Schedule (CFS) Change (Budget Neutral) Correction to CFS - Engineering Fees: During the FY24 budget, an increase in the engineering fee for lane closure was recommended by the administration. The intent was to separate the fee for sidewalk and lane closures, charging a higher rate for lane closures as justified by cost analysis. The increased fee was inadvertently applied to both sidewalk and lane closures. This correction will create a separate line item for these two types of closures with the appropriate fee applied to each. Staff note: The below table is a red lined version showing the proposed corrections to the Consolidated Fee Schedule. The transmittal included a separate ordinance for this amendment to the CFS. The budget amendment and the CFS amendment will be listed as two separate items and votes on a Council formal meeting agenda. D-3: Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope (Budget Neutral - $1,359,130 in the CIP Fund) The CIP application for "Three Creeks West - Roadways" includes only a single residential stretch of 1300 S, North of California Ave. that fronts ten residential properties and the Jordan River. This constituent application was two-part, with roadway reconstruction and utilities. This FY22-23 CIP request was submitted as follows: "Reconstruct a block of 1300 South and a block of 1000 West along Jordan River and install badly needed sewers. Will improve multimodal transportation, park access, public safety, and basic sanitation, expanding on the success of Three Creek Confluence Park." The subsequent estimate did not fully account for new utilities, nor was it eligible for utilities, as improvements for private development (which the applicant would benefit from) are not paid for by the City. Furthermore, if the sewer line was installed the property owners fronting a new line would be required by the health code to tie in at their own expense. After the City engaged with the impacted property owners not all of them agreed. Therefore, we proposed to move forward with this application with a scope limited to roadway reconstruction. No additional funds are required. The Engineering Division provided the following potential project timeline for the rescoped project. It’s important to note that construction could extend into 2025 pending resolution of permit complexities related to working adjacent to the Jordan River: -Fall 2023 – Advertise RFQ for Design Consultant -Winter 2023 / 2024 – Project Design -Spring 2024 – Construction Bidding & Contracting -Summer to Fall 2024 potentially extending to 2025 – Construction D-4: Reallocate Bond Funds from 1700 East to 2100 South Reconstruction ($1.5 Million Reallocation in CIP Fund) Public Services Engineering and CAN Transportation are recommending moving the bond funds from 1700 East to 2100 South to supplement the expanded scope and community-desired elements. The following are reasons that support the delay in the funding for the construction of 1700 East: -There is a high likelihood that Highland High School will be rebuilt in the next few years, which would likely damage the pavement and result in some needed design changes to accommodate the new school layout. -Public Utilities is planning a potential storm drain upgrade that would require significant roadway excavation shortly after the original 1700 East reconstruction project timeline. -The remaining bond funding is not adequate to fully reconstruct the segment of roadway and safety improvements necessary for a large school. -Certain elements of the desired 2100 South reconstruction project may not be completed without this adjustment. The Engineering Division provided the below table summarizing the total project funding and sources for reconstructing 2100 South through the Sugar House Business District (700 East to 1300 East). Construction level designs are anticipated to be completed this winter. Then the project would go out to bid when exact costs would be known. Additional funding based on the current designs might be needed and would come to the Council in a future budget opening. Alternatively, elements of the project designs could be removed to stay within existing budget constraints. The Division is evaluating increased eligibility for transportation impact fees. Source Amount Original 2100 South Bond Amount $8,000,000 Impact Fees $660,410 or more Class C $814,027 minimum Remaining contingency from 300 West project that can be applied to 2100 South $850,000 2022-2023 CIP Complete Streets $300,000 Anticipated funding from 2023-2024 CIP $2,750,000 (of $3,293,000 – the remainder goes to Virginia Street) Anticipated funding from BA1 $1,500,000 Total $14,874,437 Note: Public Utilities elements are funded separately and not reflected in the table The project webpage is publicly available at www.2100southslc.org D-5: Rescope Bridge Rehabilitation Funding as Local Match to Federal Funding for Rebuilding Three Bridges over the Jordan River ($6,348,507 in the CIP Fund) The City anticipates receiving approximately $21.6 million to help rebuild three City bridges over the Jordan River at 650 North, 200 South, and 500 South. UDOT would serve as the funding administrator as well as perform the design and construction of the bridges. The City would own and be responsible for maintenance of the rebuilt bridges. The first rebuild could begin in calendar year 2024 but is more likely in 2025. The funding is from the Federal Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s new Bridge Formula Program. Utah, like other states, are annually awarded funds over five years determined by a formula. The minimum annual award for every state is at least $45 million. The Federal funding goes through UDOT which ultimately selects and awards funding to individual projects. The Council approved $2,648,507 in FY2021 CIP to rehabilitate the bridges at 650 North and 400 South over the Jordan River. Inspections later determined the bridges should be fully rebuilt partly as a result of damage from the March 2020 earthquake and continued deterioration. $3.7 million was approved by the Council in FY2023 CIP for rebuilding the 650 North bridge. The combined $6,348,507 is proposed to be rescoped as local matching funds to the Federal funding. The 500 South bridge would be fully covered by $7.2 million of Federal funding. The 650 North and 200 South bridges have a 6.77% required local match for the $14.4 million grant which would be $974,880. This leaves a remaining budget of $5,373,627. The Engineering Division anticipates a significant amount of the $5.3 million would be needed to relocate public utilities. Private utilities are relocated at no cost to the City as a requirement of their franchise agreements. Utility relocations must be coordinated by the City before construction begins. This budget request includes that any remaining funding be used to rebuild the 400 South bridge over the Jordan River if any of the $5.3 million is remaining after the other three bridge rebuilds and public utilities relocations. Policy Questions: ➢Potential to Add Funding from the Public Utilities Department – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to estimate the cost of relocating publicly owned utilities as part of the bridge rebuilds and consider including funding in future Public Utilities budget proposals to leverage more funding sources and avoid potential General Fund subsidization of an enterprise fund. ➢New Amenities with Bridge Rebuilds – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration how the bridge rebuilds could bring new amenities to the impacted neighborhoods such as wider bridge decks, bike lanes, public art, lighting, traffic calming, etc. The 650 North bridge in particular would need to be coordinated with the upcoming 600 North / 700 North corridor transformation project that will construct many improvements and new amenities. Note some of the improvements and amenities could be partially eligible for impact fee funding if they are growth related. ➢Timing Bridge Rebuilds to Minimize East-West Travel Disruptions – The Council may wish to discuss with the Council what options exist to spread out the bridge rebuilds so impacts to neighborhoods are less and what other mitigation resources could be helpful. Alternatively, there might be cost savings from combining multiple bridge rebuilds under a single contract. ➢Status of the City’s Other Bridges and Funding Needs – The Council may wish to ask the Administration what the status of the City’s other bridges is, and what funding needs are anticipated in the coming years. D-6: Occupied Vehicle Mitigation Team Allocation (Budget Neutral – reallocating existing $45,000 in Public Services to the Fleet Fund and IMS Fund) For FY24, Salt Lake City Council approved 3 new FTEs for homelessness mitigation. One-time and ongoing funds were placed in Public Services Compliance General Fund budget. Some one-time funding for items related to this team belongs in other funds, namely Fleet and IMS. This request is to move the funds to the appropriate fund. D-7: Fleet Vehicle Purchases Re-appropriation ($14,424,993 from Fleet Fund Balance to Fleet Vehicle Replacement Fund) The Public Services Department is requesting the Council re-appropriate funds originally appropriated in FY2022 and FY2023 for vehicle purchases. These vehicles were unavailable to purchase before the end of FY2023 because of supply chain issues and limited ordering windows offered by vehicle manufacturers. The vehicles are still needed. If the re-appropriation is approved, then the vehicles would be ordered as soon as they become available. Section F: Donations (None) Section G: Donations (None) Section I: Council Added Items (None) ATTACHMENTS (none) ACRONYMS AFSCME - American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees CAFR – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CAN – Department of Community and Neighborhoods CIP – Capital Improvement Program Fund FY – Fiscal Year GF – General Fund FOF – Funding Our Future IMS – Information Management Services MOU – Memorandum of Understanding UDOT – Utah Department of Transportation ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer Date Received: 08/09/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 08/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 8, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: RE-RE-TRANSMITTING FY24 Budget Amendment #1 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Hunt (801) 535-7926 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY24 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $-754,483.23 $204,200.00 CIP FUND 218,000.00 218,000.00 CIP: IMPACT FEE FUND -1,648,715.00 0.00 FLEET FUND 36,800.00 14,461,793.00 IMS FUND 9,000.00 9,000.00 TOTAL $-2,139,398.23 $ 14,892,993.00 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 Lisa Shaffer (Aug 9, 2023 15:16 MDT) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY24 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for FY24. Revenue FY23‐FY24 Annual Budget FY23‐24 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 129,847,140 129,847,140 129,847,140 ‐ Sale and Use Taxes 117,129,000 117,129,000 117,129,000 ‐ Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 12,348,127 12,348,127 ‐ Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,905,573 1,905,573 1,905,573 ‐ Total Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 261,229,840 ‐ Licenses and Permits 40,878,104 40,878,104 40,878,104 ‐ Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,134,621 ‐ Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 ‐ Fines 4,063,548 4,063,548 4,063,548 ‐ Parking Meter Collections 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 ‐ Charges, Fees, and Rentals 4,881,922 4,881,922 4,881,922 ‐ Miscellaneous Revenue 3,502,359 3,502,359 3,502,359 ‐ Interfund Reimbursement 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,131,213 ‐ Transfers 9,938,944 9,938,944 9,938,944 ‐ Total W/O Special Tax 366,561,640 366,561,640 366,561,640 ‐ Additional Sales Tax (1/2%) 49,084,479 49,084,479 49,084,479 ‐ Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,646,119 415,646,119 ‐ Because of this budget amendment’s timing, there are no updates for Y24 projections available. The City has begun closing out the FY23 and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses. Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for BA#1. Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2023 Budget Projected FY2024 Budget FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 13,132,752 91,575,871 104,708,623 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (2,100,608) (20,736,262) (22,836,870) (3,657,641) (29,211,158) (32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,162,300) (17,260,909) (20,423,209) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 7,595,457 52,104,924 59,700,381 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 29.60% 27.04% 27.30% 14.51% 13.29% 13.43% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 13,132,752 95,174,631 108,307,383 7,595,457 43,548,704 51,144,161 Final Fund Balance Percent 29.60% 24.81% 25.30% 14.51% 11.10% 11.51% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - (475,000) (475,000) - (754,483) (754,483) BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - - 205,000 205,000 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - 6,000,000 6,000,000 - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,538,000) (6,538,000) - - - BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - 194,600 194,600 - - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - (7,584,328) (7,584,328) - - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (5,940,349) (5,940,349) - - - BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - 19,120,198 19,120,198 - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (11,719,731) (12,219,731) - - - BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - Change in Revenue - - - - - - Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 13,132,752 88,232,021 100,864,773 7,595,457 42,999,220 50,594,677 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 29.60% 23.00% 23.57% 14.51% 10.96% 11.38% Projected Revenue 44,364,490 383,650,846 428,015,336 52,338,120 392,166,803 444,504,923 Based on those projections adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 11.38%. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $(2,139,398.23) in revenue and $14,892,993.00 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in 5 funds, with zero increases in FTEs. The proposal includes 10 initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Section A: New Items A-1: Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP $218,000.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson The City will be receiving a donation for ball field sports lighting in Riverside Park. A budget of $300,000 currently exists for the project, but the quote for the cost of the lighting is $368,000. The installation of the lighting could start around mid-September to mid-October. The Administration, understanding that public comment is necessary before an official vote, would like to request a straw poll to allow for the receipt of the contract for the entire project. A-2: Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF $250,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Roberta Reichgelt For questions, please include Lorena Riffo Jenson, Roberta Reichgelt, Mary Beth Thompson The Department of Economic Development (DED) is requesting additional funding for the Open Streets event on Main Street in downtown Salt Lake City this fall. Funding for infrastructure costs such as UTA Trax bollards, street maintenance, and no-parking signage will cost an estimated $250,000, and after including operations and activation costs by The Downtown Alliance totaling $500,000, the total costs exceed the $500,000 City Council allocated for the event. DED is requesting funding for these additional costs in the amount of $250,000 for Open Streets infrastructure, which is a one- time cost that will service the event for the year and for future Open Streets events. A-3: Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF ($754,483.23) CIP/Impact Fund ($1,648,715.00) Department: CAN & Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Rachel Otto, Blake Thomas, Kimberly Chytraus, Katie Lewis, Randy Hillier, Mike Atkinson A Public Benefits Analysis has been transmitted to the Council pertaining to the refunding of building permits and impact fees to Ivory University House L3C. The total amount being refunded is approximately $2.4 million. This amount consists of $754,483 in building permit fees and $1,648,715 in impact fees. Should the Public Benefits Analysis be approved by the Council, a budget will need to be in place for the refunds to happen. This will be accounted for by showing negative revenue for both the Impact Fees and Permit Fees being refunded. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: AFSCME MOU Allocations GF ($511,001.00) AFSCME MOU Allocations – 911 Dispatch GF $104,175.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – CAN GF $3,963.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Police GF $55,928.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Justice Courts GF $40.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Lands GF $36,737.00 1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Services GF $310,158.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson Update the AFSCME MOU allocations for fiscal year 2024. D-2: Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lisa Hunt For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt Correction to CFS - Engineering Fees: During the FY24 budget, an increase in the engineering fee for lane closure was recommended by the administration. The intent was to separate the fee for sidewalk and lane closures, charging a higher rate for lane closures as justified by cost analysis. The increased fee was inadvertently applied to both sidewalk and lane closures. This correction will create a separate line item for these two types of closures with the appropriate fee applied to each. D-3: Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen The CIP application for "Three Creeks West - Roadways" includes only a single residential stretch of 1300 S, North of California Ave. that fronts ten residential properties and the Jordan River. This constituent application was two-part, with roadway reconstruction and utilities. This FY22-23 CIP request was submitted as follows: "Reconstruct a block of 1300 South and a block of 1000 West along Jordan River and install badly needed sewers. Will improve multimodal transportation, park access, public safety, and basic sanitation, expanding on the success of Three Creek Confluence Park." The subsequent estimate did not fully account for new utilities, nor was it eligible for utilities, as improvements for private development (which the applicant would benefit from) are not paid for by the City. Furthermore, if the sewer line was installed the property owners fronting a new line would be required by the health code to tie in at their own expense. After the City engaged with the impacted property owners not all of them agreed. Therefore, we proposed to move forward with this application with a scope limited to roadway reconstruction. No additional funds are required. D-4: 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen Public Services Engineering and CAN Transportation are recommending moving the bond funds from 1700 East to 2100 South to supplement the expanded scope and community-desired elements. The following are reasons that support the delay in the funding for the construction of 1700 East: 1. There is a high likelihood that Highland High School will be rebuilt in the next few years, which would likely damage the pavement and result in some needed design changes to accommodate the new school layout. 2. Public Utilities is planning a potential storm drain upgrade that would require significant roadway excavation shortly after the original 1700 East reconstruction project timeline. 3. The remaining bond funding is not adequate to fully reconstruct the segment of roadway and safety improvements necessary for a large school. 2 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 4. Certain elements of the desired 2100 South reconstruction project may not be funded without this request. D-5: Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services - Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen City Council previously approved $2,648,507 in FY21 for the rehabilitation of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River and the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. After the March 2020 earthquake, damage sustained to the 650 N bridge made it necessary to replace/reconstruct the bridge, and rehabilitation was no longer recommended. Subsequently, the City Council approved $3,700,000 in FY23 for the reconstruction of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River. The combined available CIP funding from FY 21 and FY23 for bridge replacements/rehabilitation is $6,348,507. City Engineering received notice from UDOT in early July 2022 that the following three (3) bridges were eligible for replacement with Federal Bridge Formula Program (BFP) funding: 1) 650 N bridge over the Jordan River, 2) 200 S bridge over the Jordan River and 3) 500 S bridge over the Jordan River. The Engineering Division received a letter from UDOT on June 29, 2023, that they would be proceeding with the approval of the proposed BFP funding for the 650 N and 200 S bridges since no potential habitats were found for an endemic orchid, as previously suspected. The total approved project value for these two (2) bridge replacement projects is $14,400,000 which will require a 6.77% local match by Salt Lake City. The 500 S bridge BFP funding should be approved in August/September 2023 however no local match will be required since this bridge will be funded 100% by BFP funding. For these bridge replacements, UDOT will serve as the funding administrator as well as perform the design and construction of the bridges. Additionally, the City is required to coordinate private and public utility relocations prior to the reconstruction of each bridge. Public utility relocation must be funded by the City. As a result, Engineering is requesting that the $6,348,507 in available bridge CIP funding from FY21 and FY23 be made available to pay for 1) 6.77% local match requirement and 2) any necessary public utility relocations (private utilities would be required to relocate their respective utilities under their respective franchise agreements at no cost to the City). Any remaining funding after the match and public utility relocation costs would be applied to the design and reconstruction of the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. D-6: Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF ($45,800.00) Fleet $36,800.00 IMS $9,000.000 Department: Public Services - Compliance Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen For FY24, Salt Lake City Council approved 3 new FTEs for homelessness mitigation. One-time and ongoing funds were placed in Public Services Compliance General Fund budget. Some one-time funding for items related to this team belongs in other funds, namely Fleet and IMS. This request is to move the funds to the appropriate fund. D-7: Fleet Encumbrances GF $14,424,993.00 Department: Public Services - Fleet Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen This is the Fleet encumbrance rollover for vehicles that were committed with the funds in FY23 or earlier but have not been received or completed. A detailed list of vehicles is included in the Backup Documentation 3 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda Section I: Council Added Items 4 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Administration Proposed Council Approved umber/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Section A: New Items 1 Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 One-time - 2 Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF - 250,000.00 One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF (754,483.23) - One-time - Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Non Dept GF - (511,001.00) Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - 911 Dispatch GF - 104,175.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - CAN GF - 3,963.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Police GF - 55,928.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Justice Courts GF - 40.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Lands GF - 36,737.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Services GF - 310,158.00 Ongoing - 2 Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA - - Ongoing - 3 Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP - - One-time - 4 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP - - One-time - 5 Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP - - One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF - (45,800.00) One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS Fleet 36,800.00 36,800.00 One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS IMS 9,000.00 9,000.00 One-time - 7 Encumbrances - Fleet Fleet - 14,424,993.00 One-time - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section F: Donations - Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Consent Agenda # Section I: Council Added Items Total of Budget Amendment Items (2,139,398.23) 14,892,993.00 - - - 1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Administration Proposed Council Approved Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1: General Fund GF (754,483.23) 204,200.00 - - - Impact Fee Fund Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - - - - Fleet Fund Fleet 36,800.00 14,461,793.00 CIP Fund CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 - - - IMS Fund IMS 9,000.00 9,000.00 - - - Total of Budget Amendment (2,139,398.23) 14,892,993.00 - - - Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (Fund 1000) 448,514,918 (754,483.23) 447,760,434.77 Curb and Gutter (FC 20) 3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41) 1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48) 4,681,185 4,681,185.00 Water Fund (FC 51) 176,637,288 176,637,288.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52) 289,941,178 289,941,178.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53) 19,865,892 19,865,892.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56) 403,513,000 403,513,000.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57) 25,240,459 25,240,459.00 Golf Fund (FC 59) 12,710,067 12,710,067.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60) 3,925,000 3,925,000.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61) 32,108,969 36,800.00 32,145,769.00 IMS Fund (FC 65) 36,254,357 9,000.00 36,263,357.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69) 9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71) 5,597,763 5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72) 8,919,917 8,919,917.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73) 400,000 400,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77) 500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78) 14,659,043 14,659,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81) 32,341,586 32,341,586.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86) 30,199,756 (1,430,715.00) 28,769,041.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85) 3,888,581 3,888,581.00 Risk Fund (FC 87) 60,932,137 60,932,137.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,623,631,451 (2,139,398.23) - - - - 1,621,492,052.77 2 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 10) 448,514,918 204,200.00 448,719,118.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20) 3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41) 1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48) 6,044,119 6,044,119.00 Water Fund (FC 51) 177,953,787 177,953,787.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52) 301,832,622 301,832,622.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53) 22,947,474 22,947,474.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56) 520,438,997 520,438,997.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57) 28,263,792 28,263,792.00 Golf Fund (FC 59) 17,938,984 17,938,984.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60) 3,800,385 3,800,385.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61) 32,498,750 14,461,793.00 46,960,543.00 IMS Fund (FC 65) 38,702,171 9,000.00 38,711,171.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69) 9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71) 5,597,763 5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72) 8,919,917 8,919,917.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73) 400,000 400,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77) 500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78) 10,212,043 10,212,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81) 34,894,979 34,894,979.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86) 29,708,286 218,000.00 29,926,286.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85) 3,370,012 3,370,012.00 Risk Fund (FC 87) 63,574,655 63,574,655.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,009 14,892,993.00 - - - - 1,783,807,002.00 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 3 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 $ 1,402,656 Impact fee - Fire 8484002 $ 273,684 B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 $ 16,793,487 C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 $ 6,304,485 D $ 24,774,312 E = A + B + C + D Calendar Fiscal Month Quarter $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Police Fire Parks Streets - - - - - - - - - - - Total, Currently Expiring through Jun 2026 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,558,788 $ 2,558,788 202306 (Jun2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Current Month 202307 (Jul2023) 202308 (Aug2023) 202309 (Sep2023) 202310 (Oct2023) 202311 (Nov2023) 202312 (Dec2023) 202401 (Jan2024) 202402 (Feb2024) 202403 (Mar2024) 202404 (Apr2024) 202405 (May2024) 202406 (Jun2024) 2024Q1 2024Q1 2024Q1 2024Q2 2024Q2 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024Q3 2024Q3 2024Q4 2024Q4 2024Q4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - 202407 (Jul2024) 202408 (Aug2024) 202409 (Sep2024) 202410 (Oct2024) 202411 (Nov2024) 202412 (Dec2024) 202501 (Jan2025) 202502 (Feb2025) 202503 (Mar2025) 202504 (Apr2025) 202505 (May2025) 202506 (Jun2025) 2025Q1 2025Q1 2025Q1 2025Q2 2025Q2 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025Q3 2025Q3 2025Q4 2025Q4 2025Q4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - 202507 (Jul2025) 202508 (Aug2025) 202509 (Sep2025) 202510 (Oct2025) 202511 (Nov2025) 202512 (Dec2025) 202601 (Jan2026) 202602 (Feb2026) 202603 (Mar2026) 202604 (Apr2026) 202605 (May2026) 202606 (Jun2026) 2026Q1 2026Q1 2026Q1 2026Q2 2026Q2 2026Q2 2026Q3 2026Q3 2026Q3 2026Q4 2026Q4 2026Q4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 1,103,628 113,748 3,960 26,929 95,407 1,065,383 95,762 53,972 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 1,103,628 113,748 3,960 26,929 95,407 1,065,383 95,762 53,972 - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2023Q1 2023Q1 2023Q1 2023Q2 2023Q2 2023Q2 2023Q3 2023Q3 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023Q4 202207 (Jul2022) 202208 (Aug2022) 202209 (Sep2022) 202210 (Oct2022) 202211 (Nov2022) 202212 (Dec2022) 202301 (Jan2023) 202302 (Feb2023) 202303 (Mar2023) 202304 (Apr2023) 202305 (May2023) Total FY 20 2 6 FY 20 2 5 FY 20 2 4 FY 20 2 3 Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Total $ 34,095,480 $ 3,419,972 $ 6,924,471 $ 2 ,751,037 TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 8484001 8484002 8484005 $ 16,793,487 8484003 C UnAllocated Budget Amount Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation YTD Sum of Police Allocation Description Cost Center Budget Amended Encumbrances Expenditures Remaining Appropriation IFFP Contract - Police 8423003 $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Grand Total $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation YTD Sum of Fire Allocation Description Cost Center Budget Amended Encumbrances Expenditures Remaining Appropriation Fire Training Center 8417015 $ (499,533) $ - $ (499,533) $ - $ 3,079 $ 3,021 $ - 58.00 $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 IFFP Contract - Fire 8423004 IF Excess Capacity - Fire 8423006 Grand Total $ 1,712,546 $ 3,021 $ 1,700,467 9,058.00 Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center Sum of Parks Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Parks Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fisher Carriage House 8420130 $ 261,187 $ - $ 261,187 $ - Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 $ 700,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ - Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 $ 16,959 $ 1,705 $ 15,254 $ - JR Boat Ram 8420144 $ 3,337 $ - $ 3,337 $ - RAC Parcel Acquisition 8423454 $ 395,442 $ - $ 395,442 $ 0 Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 $ 2,638 $ 2,596 $ - $ 42 Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 $ 23,262 $ 23,000 $ - $ 262 Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 $ 1,056 $ - $ - $ 1,056 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 $ 1,570 $ - $ - $ 1,570 9line park 8416005 $ 16,495 $ 855 $ 13,968 $ 1,672 Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 $ 2,946 $ - $ - $ 2,946 ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 $ 6,398 $ - $ - $ 6,398 Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 $ 12,431 $ 4,328 $ - $ 8,103 IFFP Contract - Parks 8423005 $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 $ 9,350 $ - $ - $ 9,350 9Line Orchard 8420136 $ 156,827 $ 132,168 $ 6,874 $ 17,785 Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 $ 275,000 $ - $ 253,170 $ 21,830 Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 $ 1,042,694 $ 240,179 $ 764,614 $ 37,902 IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 $ 56,109 $ - $ 1,302 $ 54,808 Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 $ 608,490 $ 443,065 $ 93,673 $ 71,752 FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 $ 156,565 $ 44,791 $ 30,676 $ 81,099 Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 $ 555,030 $ 52,760 $ 402,270 $ 100,000 Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 $ 254,159 $ 133,125 $ 13,640 $ 107,393 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 $ 122,281 $ - $ 1,310 $ 120,971 Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 $ 150,736 $ - $ - $ 150,736 Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 $ 160,819 $ - $ 2,781 $ 158,038 Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 $ 420,000 $ 156,146 $ 104,230 $ 159,624 RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 $ 179,323 $ - $ 712 $ 178,611 Bridge to Backman 8418005 $ 266,306 $ 10,285 $ 4,262 $ 251,758 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 $ 287,848 $ - $ - $ 287,848 Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 $ 300,000 $ - $ 678 $ 299,322 Open Space Prop Acq-Trails 8423453 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 $ 319,139 $ - $ - $ 319,139 Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 $ 327,678 $ - $ - $ 327,678 Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 $ 428,074 $ 5,593 $ 23,690 $ 398,791 Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 $ 446,825 $ 18,467 $ 14,885 $ 413,472 Open Space Prop Acq-City Parks 8423452 $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ 450,000 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 $ 510,000 $ 9,440 $ 34,921 $ 465,638 Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 $ 499,563 $ - $ 106 $ 499,457 RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 $ 521,564 $ - $ - $ 521,564 Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 $ 867,962 $ - $ 2,906 $ 865,056 Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 3,096 $ 996,905 SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 $ 1,304,682 $ 41,620 $ 62,596 $ 1,200,466 GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 $ 3,177,849 $ 524,018 $ 930,050 $ 1,723,781 Pioneer Park 8419150 $ 3,149,123 $ 69,208 $ 94,451 $ 2,985,464 Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 $ 4,350,000 $ - $ - $ 4,350,000 Grand Total $ 24,106,716 $ 1,913,351 $ 4,236,078 $ 17,957,287 Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 $ 1,292 $ - $ 1,292 $ - 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 $ 15,026 $ 11,703 $ 3,323 $ - Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 $ 13,473 $ - $ 13,473 $ - 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 $ - Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 $ 25,398 $ 25,398 $ - $ - Trans Master Plan 8419006 $ 13,000 $ - $ 13,000 $ - 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 $ 63,955 $ - $ 63,955 $ - Local Link Construction IF 8422606 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - Gladiola Street 8406001 $ 16,109 $ 12,925 $ 940 $ 2,244 Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 $ 44,400 $ - $ 38,084 $ 6,316 Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 $ 6,500 $ - $ - $ 6,500 Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 $ 29,817 $ 17,442 $ - $ 12,374 Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 $ 35,392 $ - $ 16,693 $ 18,699 500 to 700 S 8418016 $ 22,744 $ - $ - $ 22,744 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 $ 28,000 $ - $ - $ 28,000 Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 $ 58,780 $ 17,300 $ 11,746 $ 29,734 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 $ 35,300 $ - $ - $ 35,300 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 $ 37,422 $ - $ - $ 37,422 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ 40,000 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 $ 42,833 $ - $ - $ 42,833 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000 Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 $ 104,500 $ - $ - $ 104,500 Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 $ 110,000 $ - $ - $ 110,000 TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 $ 281,586 $ 124,068 $ 40,300 $ 117,218 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 $ 124,593 $ - $ - $ 124,593 Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 $ 181,846 $ - $ 542 $ 181,303 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 $ 252,000 $ - $ - $ 252,000 Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 $ 780,182 $ 46,269 $ 393,884 $ 340,029 IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ 625,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 $ 836,736 $ 55,846 $ 45,972 $ 734,918 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 $ 1,120,000 $ - $ 166 $ 1,119,834 1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 $ 3,111,335 $ 1,192,649 $ 224,557 $ 1,694,129 Grand Total $ 8,267,218 $ 1,503,600 $ 987,926 $ 5,775,692 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM Date: 7/28/23 By: EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM Date: By: EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $350$98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $1,400$394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Alejandro Sanchez (Aug 9, 2023 15:08 MDT) Email: alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com Signature: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 2, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: RE-TRANSMITTING FY24 Budget Amendment #1 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Hunt (801) 535-7926 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY24 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $-754,483.23 $250,000.00 CIP FUND 218,000.00 218,000.00 CIP: IMPACT FEE FUND -1,648,715.00 0.00 FLEET FUND 0.00 1,461,793.00 IMS FUND 0.00 9,000.00 TOTAL $-2,185,198.23 $ 1,893,793.00 08/03/2023 08/03/2023 Lisa Shaffer (Aug 3, 2023 09:54 MDT) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY24 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for FY24. Because of this budget amendment’s timing, there are no updates for Y24 projections available. The City has begun closing out the FY23 and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses. Revenue FY23-FY24 Annual Budget FY23-24 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget FY22-FY23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Property Taxes 129,847,140 129,847,140 129,847,140 - Sale and Use Taxes 117,129,000 117,129,000 117,129,000 - Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 12,348,127 12,348,127 - Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,905,573 1,905,573 1,905,573 - Total Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 261,229,840 - Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget FY22-FY23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Licenses and Permits 40,878,104 40,878,104 40,878,104 - Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,134,621 - Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 - Fines 4,063,548 4,063,548 4,063,548 - Parking Meter Collections 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 - Charges, Fees, and Rentals 4,881,922 4,881,922 4,881,922 - Miscellaneous Revenue 3,502,359 3,502,359 3,502,359 - Interfund Reimbursement 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,131,213 - Transfers 9,938,944 9,938,944 9,938,944 - Total W/O Special Tax 366,561,640 366,561,640 366,561,640 - ObjectCodeDescription FY22-23 Annual Budget FY22-23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Additional Sales Tax (1/2%)49,084,479 49,084,479 49,084,479 - Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,646,119 415,646,119 - Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for BA#1. Based on those projections adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 11.38%. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 13,132,752 91,575,871 104,708,623 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (2,100,608) (20,736,262) (22,836,870) (3,657,641) (29,211,158) (32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,162,300) (17,260,909) (20,423,209) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 7,595,457 52,104,924 59,700,381 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 29.60%27.04%27.30%14.51%13.29%13.43% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 13,132,752 95,174,631 108,307,383 7,595,457 43,548,704 51,144,161 Final Fund Balance Percent 29.60%24.81%25.30%14.51%11.10%11.51% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - (475,000) (475,000) - (754,483) (754,483) BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - - 205,000 205,000 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - 6,000,000 6,000,000 - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,538,000) (6,538,000) - - - BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - 194,600 194,600 - - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - (7,584,328) (7,584,328) - - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (5,940,349) (5,940,349) - - - BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - 19,120,198 19,120,198 - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (11,719,731) (12,219,731) - - - BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - Change in Revenue - - - - - - Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 13,132,752 88,232,021 100,864,773 7,595,457 42,999,220 50,594,677 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 29.60%23.00%23.57%14.51%10.96%11.38% Projected Revenue 44,364,490 383,650,846 428,015,336 52,338,120 392,166,803 444,504,923 FY2024 Budget Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL FY2023 Budget Projected Fund Balance Projections The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $(2,185,198.23) in revenue and $1,893,793.00 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in 5 funds, with zero increases in FTEs. The proposal includes 10 initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP $218,000.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson The City will be receiving a donation for ball field sports lighting in Riverside Park. A budget of $300,000 currently exists for the project, but the quote for the cost of the lighting is $368,000 . The installation of the lighting could start around mid-September to mid-October. The Administration, understanding that public comment is necessary before an official vote, would like to request a straw poll to allow for the receipt of the contract for the entire project. A-2: Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF $250,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Roberta Reichgelt For questions, please include Lorena Riffo Jenson, Roberta Reichgelt, Mary Beth Thompson The Department of Economic Development (DED) is requesting additional funding for the Open Streets event on Main Street in downtown Salt Lake City this fall. Funding for infrastructure costs such as UTA Trax bollards, street maintenance, and no-parking signage will cost an estimated $250,000, and after including operations and activation costs by The Downtown Alliance totaling $500,000, the total costs exceed the $500,000 City Council allocated for the event. DED is requesting funding for these additional costs in the amount of $250,000 for Open Streets infrastructure, which is a one- time cost that will service the event for the year and for future Open Streets events. A-3: Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF ($754,483.23) CIP/Impact Fund ($1,648,715.00) Department: CAN & Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Rachel Otto, Blake Thomas, Kimberly Chytraus, Katie Lewis, Randy Hillier, Mike Atkinson A Public Benefits Analysis has been transmitted to the Council pertaining to the refunding of building permits and impact fees to Ivory University House L3C. The total amount being refunded is approximately $2.4 million. This amount consists of $754,483 in building permit fees and $1,648,715 in impact fees. Should the Public Benefits Analysis be approved by the Council, a budget will need to be in place for the refunds to happen. This will be accounted for by showing negative revenue for both the Impact Fees and Permit Fees being refunded. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: AFSCME MOU Allocations GF ($511,001.00) AFSCME MOU Allocations – 911 Dispatch GF $104,175.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – CAN GF $3,963.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Police GF $55,928.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Justice Courts GF $40.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Lands GF $36,737.00 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 2 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Services GF $310,158.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson Update the AFSCME MOU allocations for fiscal year 2024. D-2: Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lisa Hunt For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt Correction to CFS - Engineering Fees: During the FY24 budget, an increase in the engineering fee for lane closure was recommended by the administration. The intent was to separate the fee for sidewalk and lane closures, charging a higher rate for lane closures as justified by cost analysis. The increased fee was inadvertently applied to both sidewalk and lane closures. This correction will create a separate line item for these two types of closures with the appropriate fee applied to each. D-3: Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen The CIP application for "Three Creeks West - Roadways" includes only a single residential stretch of 1300 S, North of California Ave. that fronts ten residential properties and the Jordan River. This constituent application was two -part, with roadway reconstruction and utilities. This FY22-23 CIP request was submitted as follows: "Reconstruct a block of 1300 South and a block of 1000 West along Jordan River and install badly needed sewers. Will improve multimodal transportation, park access, public safety , and basic sanitation, expanding on the success of Three Creek Confluence Park." The subsequent estimate did not fully account for new utilities, nor was it eligible for utilities, as improvements for priva te development (which the applicant would benefit from) are not paid for by the City. Furthermore, if the sewer line was installed the property owners fronting a new line would be required by the health code to tie in at their own expense. After the City engaged with the impacted property owners not all of them agreed. Therefore, we proposed to move forward with this application with a scope limited to roadway reconstruction. No additional funds are required. D-4: 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen Public Services Engineering and CAN Transportation are recommending moving the bond funds from 1700 East to 2100 South to supplement the expanded scope and community-desired elements. The following are reasons that support the delay in the funding for the construction of 1700 East: 1. There is a high likelihood that Highland High School will be rebuilt in the next few years, which would likely damage the pavement and result in some needed design changes to accommodate the new school layout. 2. Public Utilities is planning a potential storm drain upgrade that would require significant roadway excavation shortly after the original 1700 East reconstruction project timeline. 3. The remaining bond funding is not adequate to fully reconstruct the segment of roadway and safety improvements necessary for a large school. Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 3 4. Certain elements of the desired 2100 South reconstruction project may not be funded without this request. D-5: Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services - Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen City Council previously approved $2,648,507 in FY21 for the rehabilitation of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River and the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. After the March 2020 earthquake, damage sustained to the 650 N bridge made it necessary to replace/reconstruct the bridge, and rehabilitation was no longer recommended. Subsequently, the City Council approved $3,700,000 in FY23 for the reconstruction of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River. The combined available CIP funding from FY 21 and FY23 for bridge replacements/rehabilitation is $6,348,507. City Engineering received notice from UDOT in early July 2022 that the following three (3) bridges were eligible for replacement with Federal Bridge Formula Program (BFP) funding: 1) 650 N bridge ov er the Jordan River, 2) 200 S bridge over the Jordan River and 3) 500 S bridge over the Jordan River. The Engineering Division received a letter from UDOT on June 29, 2023, that they would be proceeding with the approval of the proposed BFP funding for th e 650 N and 200 S bridges since no potential habitats were found for an endemic orchid, as previously suspected. The total approved project value for these two (2) bridge replacement projects is $14,400,000 which will require a 6.77% local match by Salt L ake City. The 500 S bridge BFP funding should be approved in August/September 2023 however no local match will be required since this bridge will be funded 100% by BFP funding. For these bridge replacements, UDOT will serve as the funding administrator as well as perform the design and construction of the bridges. Additionally, the City is required to coordinate private and public utility relocations prior to the reconstruction of each bridge. Public utility relocation must be funded by the City. As a result, Engineering is requesting that the $6,348,507 in available bridge CIP funding from FY21 and FY23 be made available to pay for 1) 6.77% local match requirement and 2) any necessary public utility relocations (private utilities woul d be required to relocate their respective utilities under their respective franchise agreements at no cost to the City). Any remaining funding after the match and public utility relocation costs would be applied to the design and reconstruction of the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. D-6: Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF ($45,000.00) Fleet $36,800.00 IMS $9,000.000 Department: Public Services - Compliance Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen For FY24, Salt Lake City Council approved 3 new FTEs for homelessness mitigation. One -time and ongoing funds were placed in Public Services Compliance General Fund budget. Some one -time funding for items related to this team belongs in other funds, namely Fleet and IMS. This request is to move the funds to the appropriate fund. D-7: Fleet Encumbrances GF $1,424,993.00 Department: Public Services - Fleet Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen This is the Fleet encumbrance rollover for vehicles that were committed with the funds in FY23 or earlier but have not been received or completed. A detailed list of vehicles is included in the Backup Documentation Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 4 Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda Section I: Council Added Items Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 One-time - 2 Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF - 250,000.00 One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF (754,483.23) - One-time - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Non Dept GF - (511,001.00)Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - 911 Dispatch GF - 104,175.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - CAN GF - 3,963.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Police GF - 55,928.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Justice Courts GF - 40.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Lands GF - 36,737.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Services GF - 310,158.00 Ongoing - 2 Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA - - Ongoing - 3 Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP - - One-time - 4 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP - - One-time - 5 Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP - - One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF - (45,000.00) One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS Fleet - 36,800.00 One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS IMS - 9,000.00 One-time - 7 Encumbrances - Fleet Fleet - 1,424,993.00 One-time - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources - Consent Agenda # Total of Budget Amendment Items (2,185,198.23) 1,893,793.00 - - - Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section I: Council Added Items Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1: General Fund GF (754,483.23) 205,000.00 - - - Impact Fee Fund Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - - - - Fleet Fund Fleet - 1,461,793.00 CIP Fund CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 - - - IMS Fund IMS - 9,000.00 - - - Total of Budget Amendment Items (2,185,198.23) 1,893,793.00 - - - Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (Fund 1000)448,514,917 (754,483.23) 447,760,433.77 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)6,044,149 6,044,149.00 Water Fund (FC 51)177,953,787 177,953,787.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)301,832,622 301,832,622.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)22,947,474 22,947,474.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)520,438,997 520,438,997.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)28,263,792 28,263,792.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)17,938,984 17,938,984.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,498,750 32,498,750.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)38,702,171 38,702,171.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 8,919,917.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 400,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)10,212,043 10,212,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)34,894,979 34,894,979.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,708,286 (1,430,715.00) 28,277,571.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,370,012 3,370,012.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)63,574,655 63,574,655.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,038 (2,185,198.23) - - - - 1,766,728,839.77 Administration Proposed Council Approved 2 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 10)425,537,408 205,000.00 425,742,408.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,762,560 1,762,560.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,757,825 5,757,825.00 Water Fund (FC 51)132,752,815 132,752,815.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)255,914,580 255,914,580.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)18,699,722 18,699,722.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)384,681,671 384,681,671.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,952,672 24,952,672.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)14,726,016 14,726,016.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)30,426,032 1,461,793.00 31,887,825.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)30,523,167 9,000.00 30,532,167.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,458,748 9,458,748.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)4,958,433 4,958,433.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)26,614,153 26,614,153.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)300,000 300,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)287,250 287,250.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)25,779,253 25,779,253.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)33,658,558 33,658,558.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)35,460,387 218,000.00 35,678,387.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,169,767 3,169,767.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)54,679,000 54,679,000.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,525,603,402 1,893,793.00 - - - - 1,527,497,195.00 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 3 Impact Fees - Summary Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 1,402,656$ Impact fee - Fire 8484002 273,684$ B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 16,793,487$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,304,485$ D 24,774,312$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202407 (Jul2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202408 (Aug2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202409 (Sep2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202410 (Oct2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202411 (Nov2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202412 (Dec2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202501 (Jan2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202502 (Feb2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202503 (Mar2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202504 (Apr2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202505 (May2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202506 (Jun2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202507 (Jul2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202508 (Aug2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202509 (Sep2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202510 (Oct2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202511 (Nov2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 1,103,628$ 1,103,628$ 202512 (Dec2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 113,748$ 113,748$ 202601 (Jan2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 3,960$ 3,960$ 202602 (Feb2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 26,929$ 26,929$ 202603 (Mar2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 95,407$ 95,407$ 202604 (Apr2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 1,065,383$ 1,065,383$ 202605 (May2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 95,762$ 95,762$ 202606 (Jun2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 53,972$ 53,972$ Total, Currently Expiring through Jun 2026 -$ -$ -$ 2,558,788$ 2,558,788$ FY 2 0 2 3 Calendar Month FY 2 0 2 4 FY 2 0 2 5 FY 2 0 2 6 Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets Total Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Police Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Police Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Appropriation IFFP Contract - Police 8423003 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ Grand Total 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ A Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Fire Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Fire Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fire Training Center 8417015 (499,533)$ -$ (499,533)$ -$ Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ -$ 58.00 IFFP Contract - Fire 8423004 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ B IF Excess Capacity - Fire 8423006 2,200,000$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ Grand Total 1,712,546$ 3,021$ 1,700,467$ 9,058.00 Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Parks Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Parks Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fisher Carriage House 8420130 261,187$ -$ 261,187$ -$ Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 700,000$ -$ 700,000$ -$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 16,959$ 1,705$ 15,254$ -$ JR Boat Ram 8420144 3,337$ -$ 3,337$ -$ RAC Parcel Acquisition 8423454 395,442$ -$ 395,442$ 0$ Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ -$ 42$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,262$ 23,000$ -$ 262$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 9line park 8416005 16,495$ 855$ 13,968$ 1,672$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ 4,328$ -$ 8,103$ FY IFFP Contract - Parks 8423005 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 156,827$ 132,168$ 6,874$ 17,785$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ 253,170$ 21,830$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,042,694$ 240,179$ 764,614$ 37,902$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 56,109$ -$ 1,302$ 54,808$ Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 608,490$ 443,065$ 93,673$ 71,752$ C FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 156,565$ 44,791$ 30,676$ 81,099$ Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 555,030$ 52,760$ 402,270$ 100,000$ Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 254,159$ 133,125$ 13,640$ 107,393$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 122,281$ -$ 1,310$ 120,971$ Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 160,819$ -$ 2,781$ 158,038$ Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ 156,146$ 104,230$ 159,624$ RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 179,323$ -$ 712$ 178,611$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 266,306$ 10,285$ 4,262$ 251,758$ 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 287,848$ -$ -$ 287,848$ Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 300,000$ -$ 678$ 299,322$ Open Space Prop Acq-Trails 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ -$ 319,139$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 428,074$ 5,593$ 23,690$ 398,791$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 446,825$ 18,467$ 14,885$ 413,472$ Open Space Prop Acq-City Parks 8423452 450,000$ -$ -$ 450,000$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ 9,440$ 34,921$ 465,638$ Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 499,563$ -$ 106$ 499,457$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 867,962$ -$ 2,906$ 865,056$ Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 1,000,000$ -$ 3,096$ 996,905$ SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ 41,620$ 62,596$ 1,200,466$ GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,177,849$ 524,018$ 930,050$ 1,723,781$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,149,123$ 69,208$ 94,451$ 2,985,464$ Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000$ -$ -$ 4,350,000$ Grand Total 24,106,716$ 1,913,351$ 4,236,078$ 17,957,287$ Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,292$ -$ 1,292$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 15,026$ 11,703$ 3,323$ -$ Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 13,473$ -$ 13,473$ -$ 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ 25,398$ -$ -$ Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ -$ 13,000$ -$ 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 63,955$ -$ 63,955$ -$ Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ -$ Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 12,925$ 940$ 2,244$ Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ 38,084$ 6,316$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ 16,693$ 18,699$ 500 to 700 S 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ D 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 17,300$ 11,746$ 29,734$ 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$ 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 110,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$ TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 281,586$ 124,068$ 40,300$ 117,218$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 181,846$ -$ 542$ 181,303$ 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 252,000$ -$ -$ 252,000$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 780,182$ 46,269$ 393,884$ 340,029$ IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 836,736$ 55,846$ 45,972$ 734,918$ 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 1,120,000$ -$ 166$ 1,119,834$ 1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 3,111,335$ 1,192,649$ 224,557$ 1,694,129$ Grand Total 8,267,218$ 1,503,600$ 987,926$ 5,775,692$ Total 34,095,480$ 3,419,972$ 6,924,471$ 23,751,037$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 8484002 24,774,312$ 8484003 8484005 16,793,487$ 6,304,485$ $273,684 UnAllocated Budget Amount 8484001 1,402,656$ SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes 2 specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2023. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2023. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form ___ _______ Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes 2 specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2023. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2023. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form ___ _______ Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ___ of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of ____________ 2023. ______________________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: _________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________. Mayor’s Action: _________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed. _______________________________________ MAYOR _________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _______ of 2023. Published: __________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM Date:_______7/28/23_____________________ By: ___________________________________ EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ___ of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of ____________ 2023. ______________________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: _________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________. Mayor’s Action: _________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed. _______________________________________ MAYOR _________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _______ of 2023. Published: __________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $350$98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $1,400$394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Signature: Email: Alejandro Sanchez (Aug 3, 2023 09:44 MDT) alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com CITY COUNCIL // AUGUST 15, 2023 NORTH ROSE PARK LANE ANNEXATION AND ZONING AMENDMENT 2350, 2440, 2441, AND 2462 N ROSE PARK LANE PLNPCM2021-01124/01134 •Requests by JWright Properties (2350/2441 N) •Two requests: •Zoning Map Amendment (2350 N Rose Park Lane) •From AG-2, Agricultural •To R-MU, Residential/Mixed Use •Annexation from County to City –Zoning Requests •Apply R-MU to 2441 N •Apply OS to 2462 N •Apply OS to 2440 N •Intended to accommodate an 1,800 unit multi-family development on the 2350 N and 2441 N properties •City and State properties not involved in development Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial of annexation and zoning amendment REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division 2441 (J Wright) 2350 (J Wright) 2440 (City) 2462 (State) CONTEXT Salt Lake City // Planning Division $1m from State for road planning “Sports Park Blvd” 2100 North Interchange (Access) Roughly paved road Horse boarding facility Single family neighborhood, elementary and middle schools (South of RAC) Zoning Map Amendment •Requires review against standard City considerations Annexation: •No consideration standards •Requires a zone be applied when annexed •Council forwarded the annexation to Planning Commission for a zoning recommendation •Staff used considerations for a rezone Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONING AMENDMENT &ANNEXATION PROCESS •Proposed zone for J Wright (private)properties •75'height •Limited front setbacks to engage street •20%open space requirement •Allowed Use Examples: •Multi-family and low intensity commercial (i.e.retail,restaurant,office) Salt Lake City // Planning Division R-MU -RESIDENTIAL/MIXED USE 2440 (City) & 2462 (State): •Rose Park Plan (2001) calls for Open Space (OS) or Agriculture (AG) •Proposed OS –matches City and State use of properties 2350 & 2441 (J Wright -Private) •Rose Park Plan policy: •Zone properties OS or AG •“to be compatible with the State recreational (OHV) and open space land uses (RAC)” •Citywide policies •Access to healthy lifestyle/open space (RAC/Jordan River trail) •Redevelopment of underutilized property •Locating near existing infrastructure (significant planned City improvements –RAC/Sports Park Blvd) •Transit access (currently none) Salt Lake City // Planning Division PLAN CONSIDERATIONS F S t r e e t 2441 (J Wright) 2350 (J Wright) 2440 (City) 2462 (State) •Traffic study provided by applicant •Recommends phased improvements to support development •Intersection upgrades, road improvements (500 units) •Full build-out only possible if Sports Park Boulevard built •Freeway noise and air quality impacts •Could be mitigated with noise attenuating materials (similar to airport requirements) •MERV 13 HVAC filters to reduce pollution •Landscaping (trees) Salt Lake City // Planning Division ROAD IMPROVEMENTS &FREEWAY IMPACTS Turn Lane Signal/ Turn Lanes New Road •Improve/Widen Road •Add Sidewalk/ Crosswalk •Two letters generally opposed to the residential zone •One letter with conditions related to health/air quality (freeway) •Public comments at PC generally opposed (9 comments) •Air quality, infrastructure, traffic, RAC access limits Salt Lake City // Planning Division PUBLIC INPUT Recommended denial of zoning and annexation: 1.Rezoning •Doesn’t comply with Rose Park Plan •Calls for Open Space or Agricultural zoning. 2.Annexation •Doesn’t align with Plan Salt Lake policies regarding open space/recreation access •Plan Salt Lake emphasizes open space availability –RAC not accessible to general public •Doesn’t align with 2016 Council Housing Policy Statements that emphasize transit proximity and the livability of neighborhoods. •Transit not available in area Salt Lake City // Planning Division COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION •Commission didn’t offer concerns with the City and State property annexation/zoning. Staff recommended approval based on R-MU zone compatibility with RAC, utilization of City improvements (RAC/Sports Park Blvd), and proximity to open space (RAC /Jordan River Trail). Included 13 conditions: •Required, phased street improvements (striping, Rose Park Lane, sidewalks, utilities, traffic lights, Sports Park Blvd completion) •Air quality mitigations (HVAC filters, landscaping) •Noise mitigations (freeway sound attenuation, OHV park noise notice) •Setback and parking modifications •Road construction impact mitigations Salt Lake City // Planning Division STAFF RECOMMENDATION Daniel Echeverria // Senior Planner daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer Date Received: 08/09/2023 Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 08/09/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 8, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: RE-RE-TRANSMITTING FY24 Budget Amendment #1 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Hunt (801) 535-7926 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY24 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $-754,483.23 $204,200.00 CIP FUND 218,000.00 218,000.00 CIP: IMPACT FEE FUND -1,648,715.00 0.00 FLEET FUND 36,800.00 14,461,793.00 IMS FUND 9,000.00 9,000.00 TOTAL $-2,139,398.23 $ 14,892,993.00 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 Lisa Shaffer (Aug 9, 2023 15:16 MDT) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY24 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for FY24. Revenue FY23‐FY24 Annual Budget FY23‐24 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) Property Taxes 129,847,140 129,847,140 129,847,140 ‐ Sale and Use Taxes 117,129,000 117,129,000 117,129,000 ‐ Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 12,348,127 12,348,127 ‐ Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,905,573 1,905,573 1,905,573 ‐ Total Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 261,229,840 ‐ Licenses and Permits 40,878,104 40,878,104 40,878,104 ‐ Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,134,621 ‐ Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 ‐ Fines 4,063,548 4,063,548 4,063,548 ‐ Parking Meter Collections 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 ‐ Charges, Fees, and Rentals 4,881,922 4,881,922 4,881,922 ‐ Miscellaneous Revenue 3,502,359 3,502,359 3,502,359 ‐ Interfund Reimbursement 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,131,213 ‐ Transfers 9,938,944 9,938,944 9,938,944 ‐ Total W/O Special Tax 366,561,640 366,561,640 366,561,640 ‐ Additional Sales Tax (1/2%) 49,084,479 49,084,479 49,084,479 ‐ Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,646,119 415,646,119 ‐ Because of this budget amendment’s timing, there are no updates for Y24 projections available. The City has begun closing out the FY23 and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses. Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for BA#1. Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2023 Budget Projected FY2024 Budget FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 13,132,752 91,575,871 104,708,623 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (2,100,608) (20,736,262) (22,836,870) (3,657,641) (29,211,158) (32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,162,300) (17,260,909) (20,423,209) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 7,595,457 52,104,924 59,700,381 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 29.60% 27.04% 27.30% 14.51% 13.29% 13.43% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 13,132,752 95,174,631 108,307,383 7,595,457 43,548,704 51,144,161 Final Fund Balance Percent 29.60% 24.81% 25.30% 14.51% 11.10% 11.51% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - (475,000) (475,000) - (754,483) (754,483) BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - - 205,000 205,000 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - 6,000,000 6,000,000 - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,538,000) (6,538,000) - - - BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - 194,600 194,600 - - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - (7,584,328) (7,584,328) - - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (5,940,349) (5,940,349) - - - BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - 19,120,198 19,120,198 - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (11,719,731) (12,219,731) - - - BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - Change in Revenue - - - - - - Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 13,132,752 88,232,021 100,864,773 7,595,457 42,999,220 50,594,677 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 29.60% 23.00% 23.57% 14.51% 10.96% 11.38% Projected Revenue 44,364,490 383,650,846 428,015,336 52,338,120 392,166,803 444,504,923 Based on those projections adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 11.38%. The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $(2,139,398.23) in revenue and $14,892,993.00 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in 5 funds, with zero increases in FTEs. The proposal includes 10 initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Section A: New Items A-1: Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP $218,000.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson The City will be receiving a donation for ball field sports lighting in Riverside Park. A budget of $300,000 currently exists for the project, but the quote for the cost of the lighting is $368,000. The installation of the lighting could start around mid-September to mid-October. The Administration, understanding that public comment is necessary before an official vote, would like to request a straw poll to allow for the receipt of the contract for the entire project. A-2: Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF $250,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Roberta Reichgelt For questions, please include Lorena Riffo Jenson, Roberta Reichgelt, Mary Beth Thompson The Department of Economic Development (DED) is requesting additional funding for the Open Streets event on Main Street in downtown Salt Lake City this fall. Funding for infrastructure costs such as UTA Trax bollards, street maintenance, and no-parking signage will cost an estimated $250,000, and after including operations and activation costs by The Downtown Alliance totaling $500,000, the total costs exceed the $500,000 City Council allocated for the event. DED is requesting funding for these additional costs in the amount of $250,000 for Open Streets infrastructure, which is a one- time cost that will service the event for the year and for future Open Streets events. A-3: Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF ($754,483.23) CIP/Impact Fund ($1,648,715.00) Department: CAN & Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Rachel Otto, Blake Thomas, Kimberly Chytraus, Katie Lewis, Randy Hillier, Mike Atkinson A Public Benefits Analysis has been transmitted to the Council pertaining to the refunding of building permits and impact fees to Ivory University House L3C. The total amount being refunded is approximately $2.4 million. This amount consists of $754,483 in building permit fees and $1,648,715 in impact fees. Should the Public Benefits Analysis be approved by the Council, a budget will need to be in place for the refunds to happen. This will be accounted for by showing negative revenue for both the Impact Fees and Permit Fees being refunded. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: AFSCME MOU Allocations GF ($511,001.00) AFSCME MOU Allocations – 911 Dispatch GF $104,175.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – CAN GF $3,963.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Police GF $55,928.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Justice Courts GF $40.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Lands GF $36,737.00 1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Services GF $310,158.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson Update the AFSCME MOU allocations for fiscal year 2024. D-2: Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lisa Hunt For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt Correction to CFS - Engineering Fees: During the FY24 budget, an increase in the engineering fee for lane closure was recommended by the administration. The intent was to separate the fee for sidewalk and lane closures, charging a higher rate for lane closures as justified by cost analysis. The increased fee was inadvertently applied to both sidewalk and lane closures. This correction will create a separate line item for these two types of closures with the appropriate fee applied to each. D-3: Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen The CIP application for "Three Creeks West - Roadways" includes only a single residential stretch of 1300 S, North of California Ave. that fronts ten residential properties and the Jordan River. This constituent application was two-part, with roadway reconstruction and utilities. This FY22-23 CIP request was submitted as follows: "Reconstruct a block of 1300 South and a block of 1000 West along Jordan River and install badly needed sewers. Will improve multimodal transportation, park access, public safety, and basic sanitation, expanding on the success of Three Creek Confluence Park." The subsequent estimate did not fully account for new utilities, nor was it eligible for utilities, as improvements for private development (which the applicant would benefit from) are not paid for by the City. Furthermore, if the sewer line was installed the property owners fronting a new line would be required by the health code to tie in at their own expense. After the City engaged with the impacted property owners not all of them agreed. Therefore, we proposed to move forward with this application with a scope limited to roadway reconstruction. No additional funds are required. D-4: 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen Public Services Engineering and CAN Transportation are recommending moving the bond funds from 1700 East to 2100 South to supplement the expanded scope and community-desired elements. The following are reasons that support the delay in the funding for the construction of 1700 East: 1. There is a high likelihood that Highland High School will be rebuilt in the next few years, which would likely damage the pavement and result in some needed design changes to accommodate the new school layout. 2. Public Utilities is planning a potential storm drain upgrade that would require significant roadway excavation shortly after the original 1700 East reconstruction project timeline. 3. The remaining bond funding is not adequate to fully reconstruct the segment of roadway and safety improvements necessary for a large school. 2 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 4. Certain elements of the desired 2100 South reconstruction project may not be funded without this request. D-5: Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services - Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen City Council previously approved $2,648,507 in FY21 for the rehabilitation of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River and the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. After the March 2020 earthquake, damage sustained to the 650 N bridge made it necessary to replace/reconstruct the bridge, and rehabilitation was no longer recommended. Subsequently, the City Council approved $3,700,000 in FY23 for the reconstruction of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River. The combined available CIP funding from FY 21 and FY23 for bridge replacements/rehabilitation is $6,348,507. City Engineering received notice from UDOT in early July 2022 that the following three (3) bridges were eligible for replacement with Federal Bridge Formula Program (BFP) funding: 1) 650 N bridge over the Jordan River, 2) 200 S bridge over the Jordan River and 3) 500 S bridge over the Jordan River. The Engineering Division received a letter from UDOT on June 29, 2023, that they would be proceeding with the approval of the proposed BFP funding for the 650 N and 200 S bridges since no potential habitats were found for an endemic orchid, as previously suspected. The total approved project value for these two (2) bridge replacement projects is $14,400,000 which will require a 6.77% local match by Salt Lake City. The 500 S bridge BFP funding should be approved in August/September 2023 however no local match will be required since this bridge will be funded 100% by BFP funding. For these bridge replacements, UDOT will serve as the funding administrator as well as perform the design and construction of the bridges. Additionally, the City is required to coordinate private and public utility relocations prior to the reconstruction of each bridge. Public utility relocation must be funded by the City. As a result, Engineering is requesting that the $6,348,507 in available bridge CIP funding from FY21 and FY23 be made available to pay for 1) 6.77% local match requirement and 2) any necessary public utility relocations (private utilities would be required to relocate their respective utilities under their respective franchise agreements at no cost to the City). Any remaining funding after the match and public utility relocation costs would be applied to the design and reconstruction of the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. D-6: Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF ($45,800.00) Fleet $36,800.00 IMS $9,000.000 Department: Public Services - Compliance Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen For FY24, Salt Lake City Council approved 3 new FTEs for homelessness mitigation. One-time and ongoing funds were placed in Public Services Compliance General Fund budget. Some one-time funding for items related to this team belongs in other funds, namely Fleet and IMS. This request is to move the funds to the appropriate fund. D-7: Fleet Encumbrances GF $14,424,993.00 Department: Public Services - Fleet Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen This is the Fleet encumbrance rollover for vehicles that were committed with the funds in FY23 or earlier but have not been received or completed. A detailed list of vehicles is included in the Backup Documentation 3 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda Section I: Council Added Items 4 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Administration Proposed Council Approved umber/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Section A: New Items 1 Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 One-time - 2 Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF - 250,000.00 One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF (754,483.23) - One-time - Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Non Dept GF - (511,001.00) Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - 911 Dispatch GF - 104,175.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - CAN GF - 3,963.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Police GF - 55,928.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Justice Courts GF - 40.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Lands GF - 36,737.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Services GF - 310,158.00 Ongoing - 2 Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA - - Ongoing - 3 Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP - - One-time - 4 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP - - One-time - 5 Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP - - One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF - (45,800.00) One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS Fleet 36,800.00 36,800.00 One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS IMS 9,000.00 9,000.00 One-time - 7 Encumbrances - Fleet Fleet - 14,424,993.00 One-time - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section F: Donations - Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Consent Agenda # Section I: Council Added Items Total of Budget Amendment Items (2,139,398.23) 14,892,993.00 - - - 1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Administration Proposed Council Approved Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1: General Fund GF (754,483.23) 204,200.00 - - - Impact Fee Fund Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - - - - Fleet Fund Fleet 36,800.00 14,461,793.00 CIP Fund CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 - - - IMS Fund IMS 9,000.00 9,000.00 - - - Total of Budget Amendment (2,139,398.23) 14,892,993.00 - - - Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (Fund 1000) 448,514,918 (754,483.23) 447,760,434.77 Curb and Gutter (FC 20) 3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41) 1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48) 4,681,185 4,681,185.00 Water Fund (FC 51) 176,637,288 176,637,288.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52) 289,941,178 289,941,178.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53) 19,865,892 19,865,892.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56) 403,513,000 403,513,000.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57) 25,240,459 25,240,459.00 Golf Fund (FC 59) 12,710,067 12,710,067.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60) 3,925,000 3,925,000.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61) 32,108,969 36,800.00 32,145,769.00 IMS Fund (FC 65) 36,254,357 9,000.00 36,263,357.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69) 9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71) 5,597,763 5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72) 8,919,917 8,919,917.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73) 400,000 400,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77) 500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78) 14,659,043 14,659,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81) 32,341,586 32,341,586.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86) 30,199,756 (1,430,715.00) 28,769,041.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85) 3,888,581 3,888,581.00 Risk Fund (FC 87) 60,932,137 60,932,137.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,623,631,451 (2,139,398.23) - - - - 1,621,492,052.77 2 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 10) 448,514,918 204,200.00 448,719,118.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20) 3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41) 1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46) 1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48) 6,044,119 6,044,119.00 Water Fund (FC 51) 177,953,787 177,953,787.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52) 301,832,622 301,832,622.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53) 22,947,474 22,947,474.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56) 520,438,997 520,438,997.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57) 28,263,792 28,263,792.00 Golf Fund (FC 59) 17,938,984 17,938,984.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60) 3,800,385 3,800,385.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61) 32,498,750 14,461,793.00 46,960,543.00 IMS Fund (FC 65) 38,702,171 9,000.00 38,711,171.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69) 9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71) 5,597,763 5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72) 8,919,917 8,919,917.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73) 400,000 400,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77) 500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78) 10,212,043 10,212,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81) 34,894,979 34,894,979.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86) 29,708,286 218,000.00 29,926,286.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85) 3,370,012 3,370,012.00 Risk Fund (FC 87) 63,574,655 63,574,655.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,009 14,892,993.00 - - - - 1,783,807,002.00 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 3 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 $ 1,402,656 Impact fee - Fire 8484002 $ 273,684 B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 $ 16,793,487 C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 $ 6,304,485 D $ 24,774,312 E = A + B + C + D Calendar Fiscal Month Quarter $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Police Fire Parks Streets - - - - - - - - - - - Total, Currently Expiring through Jun 2026 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,558,788 $ 2,558,788 202306 (Jun2023) 2023Q4 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Current Month 202307 (Jul2023) 202308 (Aug2023) 202309 (Sep2023) 202310 (Oct2023) 202311 (Nov2023) 202312 (Dec2023) 202401 (Jan2024) 202402 (Feb2024) 202403 (Mar2024) 202404 (Apr2024) 202405 (May2024) 202406 (Jun2024) 2024Q1 2024Q1 2024Q1 2024Q2 2024Q2 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024Q3 2024Q3 2024Q4 2024Q4 2024Q4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - 202407 (Jul2024) 202408 (Aug2024) 202409 (Sep2024) 202410 (Oct2024) 202411 (Nov2024) 202412 (Dec2024) 202501 (Jan2025) 202502 (Feb2025) 202503 (Mar2025) 202504 (Apr2025) 202505 (May2025) 202506 (Jun2025) 2025Q1 2025Q1 2025Q1 2025Q2 2025Q2 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025Q3 2025Q3 2025Q4 2025Q4 2025Q4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - 202507 (Jul2025) 202508 (Aug2025) 202509 (Sep2025) 202510 (Oct2025) 202511 (Nov2025) 202512 (Dec2025) 202601 (Jan2026) 202602 (Feb2026) 202603 (Mar2026) 202604 (Apr2026) 202605 (May2026) 202606 (Jun2026) 2026Q1 2026Q1 2026Q1 2026Q2 2026Q2 2026Q2 2026Q3 2026Q3 2026Q3 2026Q4 2026Q4 2026Q4 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 1,103,628 113,748 3,960 26,929 95,407 1,065,383 95,762 53,972 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - 1,103,628 113,748 3,960 26,929 95,407 1,065,383 95,762 53,972 - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2023Q1 2023Q1 2023Q1 2023Q2 2023Q2 2023Q2 2023Q3 2023Q3 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023Q4 202207 (Jul2022) 202208 (Aug2022) 202209 (Sep2022) 202210 (Oct2022) 202211 (Nov2022) 202212 (Dec2022) 202301 (Jan2023) 202302 (Feb2023) 202303 (Mar2023) 202304 (Apr2023) 202305 (May2023) Total FY 20 2 6 FY 20 2 5 FY 20 2 4 FY 20 2 3 Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Total $ 34,095,480 $ 3,419,972 $ 6,924,471 $ 2 ,751,037 TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 8484001 8484002 8484005 $ 16,793,487 8484003 C UnAllocated Budget Amount Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation Sum of Police Allocation YTD Sum of Police Allocation Description Cost Center Budget Amended Encumbrances Expenditures Remaining Appropriation IFFP Contract - Police 8423003 $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Grand Total $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation Sum of Fire Allocation YTD Sum of Fire Allocation Description Cost Center Budget Amended Encumbrances Expenditures Remaining Appropriation Fire Training Center 8417015 $ (499,533) $ - $ (499,533) $ - $ 3,079 $ 3,021 $ - 58.00 $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 $ 2,200,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 $ - Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 IFFP Contract - Fire 8423004 IF Excess Capacity - Fire 8423006 Grand Total $ 1,712,546 $ 3,021 $ 1,700,467 9,058.00 Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center Sum of Parks Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Parks Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fisher Carriage House 8420130 $ 261,187 $ - $ 261,187 $ - Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 $ 700,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ - Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 $ 16,959 $ 1,705 $ 15,254 $ - JR Boat Ram 8420144 $ 3,337 $ - $ 3,337 $ - RAC Parcel Acquisition 8423454 $ 395,442 $ - $ 395,442 $ 0 Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 $ 2,638 $ 2,596 $ - $ 42 Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 $ 23,262 $ 23,000 $ - $ 262 Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 $ 1,056 $ - $ - $ 1,056 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 $ 1,570 $ - $ - $ 1,570 9line park 8416005 $ 16,495 $ 855 $ 13,968 $ 1,672 Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 $ 2,946 $ - $ - $ 2,946 ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 $ 6,398 $ - $ - $ 6,398 Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 $ 12,431 $ 4,328 $ - $ 8,103 IFFP Contract - Parks 8423005 $ 9,000 $ - $ - $ 9,000 Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 $ 9,350 $ - $ - $ 9,350 9Line Orchard 8420136 $ 156,827 $ 132,168 $ 6,874 $ 17,785 Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 $ 275,000 $ - $ 253,170 $ 21,830 Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 $ 1,042,694 $ 240,179 $ 764,614 $ 37,902 IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 $ 56,109 $ - $ 1,302 $ 54,808 Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 $ 608,490 $ 443,065 $ 93,673 $ 71,752 FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 $ 156,565 $ 44,791 $ 30,676 $ 81,099 Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 $ 555,030 $ 52,760 $ 402,270 $ 100,000 Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 $ 254,159 $ 133,125 $ 13,640 $ 107,393 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 $ 122,281 $ - $ 1,310 $ 120,971 Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 $ 150,736 $ - $ - $ 150,736 Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 $ 160,819 $ - $ 2,781 $ 158,038 Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 $ 420,000 $ 156,146 $ 104,230 $ 159,624 RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 $ 179,323 $ - $ 712 $ 178,611 Bridge to Backman 8418005 $ 266,306 $ 10,285 $ 4,262 $ 251,758 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 $ 287,848 $ - $ - $ 287,848 Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 $ 300,000 $ - $ 678 $ 299,322 Open Space Prop Acq-Trails 8423453 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 $ 319,139 $ - $ - $ 319,139 Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 $ 327,678 $ - $ - $ 327,678 Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 $ 428,074 $ 5,593 $ 23,690 $ 398,791 Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 $ 446,825 $ 18,467 $ 14,885 $ 413,472 Open Space Prop Acq-City Parks 8423452 $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ 450,000 Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 $ 510,000 $ 9,440 $ 34,921 $ 465,638 Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 $ 499,563 $ - $ 106 $ 499,457 RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 $ 521,564 $ - $ - $ 521,564 Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 $ 867,962 $ - $ 2,906 $ 865,056 Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 3,096 $ 996,905 SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 $ 1,304,682 $ 41,620 $ 62,596 $ 1,200,466 GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 $ 3,177,849 $ 524,018 $ 930,050 $ 1,723,781 Pioneer Park 8419150 $ 3,149,123 $ 69,208 $ 94,451 $ 2,985,464 Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 $ 4,350,000 $ - $ - $ 4,350,000 Grand Total $ 24,106,716 $ 1,913,351 $ 4,236,078 $ 17,957,287 Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 $ 1,292 $ - $ 1,292 $ - 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 $ 15,026 $ 11,703 $ 3,323 $ - Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 $ 13,473 $ - $ 13,473 $ - 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 $ 70,000 $ - $ 70,000 $ - Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 $ 25,398 $ 25,398 $ - $ - Trans Master Plan 8419006 $ 13,000 $ - $ 13,000 $ - 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 $ 63,955 $ - $ 63,955 $ - Local Link Construction IF 8422606 $ 50,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ - Gladiola Street 8406001 $ 16,109 $ 12,925 $ 940 $ 2,244 Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 $ 44,400 $ - $ 38,084 $ 6,316 Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 $ 6,500 $ - $ - $ 6,500 Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 $ 29,817 $ 17,442 $ - $ 12,374 Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 $ 35,392 $ - $ 16,693 $ 18,699 500 to 700 S 8418016 $ 22,744 $ - $ - $ 22,744 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 $ 28,000 $ - $ - $ 28,000 Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 $ 58,780 $ 17,300 $ 11,746 $ 29,734 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 $ 35,300 $ - $ - $ 35,300 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 $ 37,422 $ - $ - $ 37,422 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ 40,000 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 $ 42,833 $ - $ - $ 42,833 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000 Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 $ 104,500 $ - $ - $ 104,500 Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 $ 110,000 $ - $ - $ 110,000 TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 $ 281,586 $ 124,068 $ 40,300 $ 117,218 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 $ 124,593 $ - $ - $ 124,593 Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 $ 181,846 $ - $ 542 $ 181,303 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 $ 252,000 $ - $ - $ 252,000 Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 $ 780,182 $ 46,269 $ 393,884 $ 340,029 IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ 625,000 Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 $ 836,736 $ 55,846 $ 45,972 $ 734,918 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 $ 1,120,000 $ - $ 166 $ 1,119,834 1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 $ 3,111,335 $ 1,192,649 $ 224,557 $ 1,694,129 Grand Total $ 8,267,218 $ 1,503,600 $ 987,926 $ 5,775,692 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: . 2 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM Date: 7/28/23 By: EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of 2023. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2023. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM Date: By: EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $350$98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $1,400$394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Alejandro Sanchez (Aug 9, 2023 15:08 MDT) Email: alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com Signature: DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 2, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: RE-TRANSMITTING FY24 Budget Amendment #1 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Lisa Hunt (801) 535-7926 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY24 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $-754,483.23 $250,000.00 CIP FUND 218,000.00 218,000.00 CIP: IMPACT FEE FUND -1,648,715.00 0.00 FLEET FUND 0.00 1,461,793.00 IMS FUND 0.00 9,000.00 TOTAL $-2,185,198.23 $ 1,893,793.00 08/03/2023 08/03/2023 Lisa Shaffer (Aug 3, 2023 09:54 MDT) BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY24 Budget Adjustments The following chart shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for FY24. Because of this budget amendment’s timing, there are no updates for Y24 projections available. The City has begun closing out the FY23 and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses. Revenue FY23-FY24 Annual Budget FY23-24 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget FY22-FY23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Property Taxes 129,847,140 129,847,140 129,847,140 - Sale and Use Taxes 117,129,000 117,129,000 117,129,000 - Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 12,348,127 12,348,127 - Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,905,573 1,905,573 1,905,573 - Total Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 261,229,840 - Revenue FY22-FY23 Annual Budget FY22-FY23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Licenses and Permits 40,878,104 40,878,104 40,878,104 - Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,134,621 - Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 - Fines 4,063,548 4,063,548 4,063,548 - Parking Meter Collections 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 - Charges, Fees, and Rentals 4,881,922 4,881,922 4,881,922 - Miscellaneous Revenue 3,502,359 3,502,359 3,502,359 - Interfund Reimbursement 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,131,213 - Transfers 9,938,944 9,938,944 9,938,944 - Total W/O Special Tax 366,561,640 366,561,640 366,561,640 - ObjectCodeDescription FY22-23 Annual Budget FY22-23 Amended Budget Revised Forecast Amended Variance Additional Sales Tax (1/2%)49,084,479 49,084,479 49,084,479 - Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,646,119 415,646,119 - Fund balance has been updated to include proposed changes for BA#1. Based on those projections adjusted fund balance is projected to be at 11.38%. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 18,395,660 141,728,022 160,123,682 13,132,752 91,575,871 104,708,623 Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (2,100,608) (20,736,262) (22,836,870) (3,657,641) (29,211,158) (32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (3,162,300) (17,260,909) (20,423,209) (1,879,654) (10,259,789) (12,139,443) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 13,132,752 103,730,851 116,863,603 7,595,457 52,104,924 59,700,381 Beginning Fund Balance Percent 29.60%27.04%27.30%14.51%13.29%13.43% Year End CAFR Adjustments Revenue Changes - - - - - - Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) (8,556,220) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 13,132,752 95,174,631 108,307,383 7,595,457 43,548,704 51,144,161 Final Fund Balance Percent 29.60%24.81%25.30%14.51%11.10%11.51% Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - (475,000) (475,000) - (754,483) (754,483) BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - - 205,000 205,000 BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#2 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - 6,000,000 6,000,000 - - - BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,538,000) (6,538,000) - - - BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - 194,600 194,600 - - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - (7,584,328) (7,584,328) - - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (5,940,349) (5,940,349) - - - BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - 19,120,198 19,120,198 - - - BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (11,719,731) (12,219,731) - - - BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - - BA#7 Expense Adjustment - - - - - - Change in Revenue - - - - - - Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase - - - - - - - - Adjusted Fund Balance 13,132,752 88,232,021 100,864,773 7,595,457 42,999,220 50,594,677 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 29.60%23.00%23.57%14.51%10.96%11.38% Projected Revenue 44,364,490 383,650,846 428,015,336 52,338,120 392,166,803 444,504,923 FY2024 Budget Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL FY2023 Budget Projected Fund Balance Projections The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $(2,185,198.23) in revenue and $1,893,793.00 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in 5 funds, with zero increases in FTEs. The proposal includes 10 initiatives for Council review. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP $218,000.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Sean Fyfe, Mary Beth Thompson The City will be receiving a donation for ball field sports lighting in Riverside Park. A budget of $300,000 currently exists for the project, but the quote for the cost of the lighting is $368,000 . The installation of the lighting could start around mid-September to mid-October. The Administration, understanding that public comment is necessary before an official vote, would like to request a straw poll to allow for the receipt of the contract for the entire project. A-2: Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF $250,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Roberta Reichgelt For questions, please include Lorena Riffo Jenson, Roberta Reichgelt, Mary Beth Thompson The Department of Economic Development (DED) is requesting additional funding for the Open Streets event on Main Street in downtown Salt Lake City this fall. Funding for infrastructure costs such as UTA Trax bollards, street maintenance, and no-parking signage will cost an estimated $250,000, and after including operations and activation costs by The Downtown Alliance totaling $500,000, the total costs exceed the $500,000 City Council allocated for the event. DED is requesting funding for these additional costs in the amount of $250,000 for Open Streets infrastructure, which is a one- time cost that will service the event for the year and for future Open Streets events. A-3: Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF ($754,483.23) CIP/Impact Fund ($1,648,715.00) Department: CAN & Finance Prepared By: Randy Hillier For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Rachel Otto, Blake Thomas, Kimberly Chytraus, Katie Lewis, Randy Hillier, Mike Atkinson A Public Benefits Analysis has been transmitted to the Council pertaining to the refunding of building permits and impact fees to Ivory University House L3C. The total amount being refunded is approximately $2.4 million. This amount consists of $754,483 in building permit fees and $1,648,715 in impact fees. Should the Public Benefits Analysis be approved by the Council, a budget will need to be in place for the refunds to happen. This will be accounted for by showing negative revenue for both the Impact Fees and Permit Fees being refunded. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: AFSCME MOU Allocations GF ($511,001.00) AFSCME MOU Allocations – 911 Dispatch GF $104,175.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – CAN GF $3,963.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Police GF $55,928.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Justice Courts GF $40.00 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Lands GF $36,737.00 Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 2 AFSCME MOU Allocations – Public Services GF $310,158.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson Update the AFSCME MOU allocations for fiscal year 2024. D-2: Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lisa Hunt For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt Correction to CFS - Engineering Fees: During the FY24 budget, an increase in the engineering fee for lane closure was recommended by the administration. The intent was to separate the fee for sidewalk and lane closures, charging a higher rate for lane closures as justified by cost analysis. The increased fee was inadvertently applied to both sidewalk and lane closures. This correction will create a separate line item for these two types of closures with the appropriate fee applied to each. D-3: Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen The CIP application for "Three Creeks West - Roadways" includes only a single residential stretch of 1300 S, North of California Ave. that fronts ten residential properties and the Jordan River. This constituent application was two -part, with roadway reconstruction and utilities. This FY22-23 CIP request was submitted as follows: "Reconstruct a block of 1300 South and a block of 1000 West along Jordan River and install badly needed sewers. Will improve multimodal transportation, park access, public safety , and basic sanitation, expanding on the success of Three Creek Confluence Park." The subsequent estimate did not fully account for new utilities, nor was it eligible for utilities, as improvements for priva te development (which the applicant would benefit from) are not paid for by the City. Furthermore, if the sewer line was installed the property owners fronting a new line would be required by the health code to tie in at their own expense. After the City engaged with the impacted property owners not all of them agreed. Therefore, we proposed to move forward with this application with a scope limited to roadway reconstruction. No additional funds are required. D-4: 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services – Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen Public Services Engineering and CAN Transportation are recommending moving the bond funds from 1700 East to 2100 South to supplement the expanded scope and community-desired elements. The following are reasons that support the delay in the funding for the construction of 1700 East: 1. There is a high likelihood that Highland High School will be rebuilt in the next few years, which would likely damage the pavement and result in some needed design changes to accommodate the new school layout. 2. Public Utilities is planning a potential storm drain upgrade that would require significant roadway excavation shortly after the original 1700 East reconstruction project timeline. 3. The remaining bond funding is not adequate to fully reconstruct the segment of roadway and safety improvements necessary for a large school. Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 3 4. Certain elements of the desired 2100 South reconstruction project may not be funded without this request. D-5: Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP $0.00 Department: Public Services - Engineering Prepared By: Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen For questions, please include Josh Willie, Mark Stephens, JP Goates, Dustin Petersen City Council previously approved $2,648,507 in FY21 for the rehabilitation of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River and the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. After the March 2020 earthquake, damage sustained to the 650 N bridge made it necessary to replace/reconstruct the bridge, and rehabilitation was no longer recommended. Subsequently, the City Council approved $3,700,000 in FY23 for the reconstruction of the 650 N bridge over the Jordan River. The combined available CIP funding from FY 21 and FY23 for bridge replacements/rehabilitation is $6,348,507. City Engineering received notice from UDOT in early July 2022 that the following three (3) bridges were eligible for replacement with Federal Bridge Formula Program (BFP) funding: 1) 650 N bridge ov er the Jordan River, 2) 200 S bridge over the Jordan River and 3) 500 S bridge over the Jordan River. The Engineering Division received a letter from UDOT on June 29, 2023, that they would be proceeding with the approval of the proposed BFP funding for th e 650 N and 200 S bridges since no potential habitats were found for an endemic orchid, as previously suspected. The total approved project value for these two (2) bridge replacement projects is $14,400,000 which will require a 6.77% local match by Salt L ake City. The 500 S bridge BFP funding should be approved in August/September 2023 however no local match will be required since this bridge will be funded 100% by BFP funding. For these bridge replacements, UDOT will serve as the funding administrator as well as perform the design and construction of the bridges. Additionally, the City is required to coordinate private and public utility relocations prior to the reconstruction of each bridge. Public utility relocation must be funded by the City. As a result, Engineering is requesting that the $6,348,507 in available bridge CIP funding from FY21 and FY23 be made available to pay for 1) 6.77% local match requirement and 2) any necessary public utility relocations (private utilities woul d be required to relocate their respective utilities under their respective franchise agreements at no cost to the City). Any remaining funding after the match and public utility relocation costs would be applied to the design and reconstruction of the 400 S bridge over the Jordan River. D-6: Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF ($45,000.00) Fleet $36,800.00 IMS $9,000.000 Department: Public Services - Compliance Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen For FY24, Salt Lake City Council approved 3 new FTEs for homelessness mitigation. One -time and ongoing funds were placed in Public Services Compliance General Fund budget. Some one -time funding for items related to this team belongs in other funds, namely Fleet and IMS. This request is to move the funds to the appropriate fund. D-7: Fleet Encumbrances GF $1,424,993.00 Department: Public Services - Fleet Prepared By: Dustin Petersen For questions, please contact Dustin Petersen This is the Fleet encumbrance rollover for vehicles that were committed with the funds in FY23 or earlier but have not been received or completed. A detailed list of vehicles is included in the Backup Documentation Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount 4 Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda Section I: Council Added Items Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Donation to CIP for Ball Field Sports Lighting at Riverside Park CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 One-time - 2 Funding for Open Streets Initiative GF - 250,000.00 One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - One-time - 3 Funding for Impact and Permit Fee Refund to Ivory University House GF (754,483.23) - One-time - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Non Dept GF - (511,001.00)Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - 911 Dispatch GF - 104,175.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - CAN GF - 3,963.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Police GF - 55,928.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Justice Courts GF - 40.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Lands GF - 36,737.00 Ongoing - 1 AFSCME MOU Allocations - Public Services GF - 310,158.00 Ongoing - 2 Consolidated Fee Schedule Change NA - - Ongoing - 3 Three Creeks West Roadway Rescope CIP - - One-time - 4 1700 E. to 2100 S. Project Budget Reallocation CIP - - One-time - 5 Bridge Projects Funding Rescope for UDOT Match CIP - - One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS GF - (45,000.00) One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS Fleet - 36,800.00 One-time - 6 Compliance Mitigation Team – Fleet and IMS IMS - 9,000.00 One-time - 7 Encumbrances - Fleet Fleet - 1,424,993.00 One-time - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources - Consent Agenda # Total of Budget Amendment Items (2,185,198.23) 1,893,793.00 - - - Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section I: Council Added Items Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1: General Fund GF (754,483.23) 205,000.00 - - - Impact Fee Fund Impact Fee (1,648,715.00) - - - - Fleet Fund Fleet - 1,461,793.00 CIP Fund CIP 218,000.00 218,000.00 - - - IMS Fund IMS - 9,000.00 - - - Total of Budget Amendment Items (2,185,198.23) 1,893,793.00 - - - Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (Fund 1000)448,514,917 (754,483.23) 447,760,433.77 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)6,044,149 6,044,149.00 Water Fund (FC 51)177,953,787 177,953,787.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)301,832,622 301,832,622.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)22,947,474 22,947,474.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)520,438,997 520,438,997.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)28,263,792 28,263,792.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)17,938,984 17,938,984.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,498,750 32,498,750.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)38,702,171 38,702,171.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 5,597,763.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 8,919,917.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 400,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)10,212,043 10,212,043.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)34,894,979 34,894,979.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,708,286 (1,430,715.00) 28,277,571.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,370,012 3,370,012.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)63,574,655 63,574,655.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,038 (2,185,198.23) - - - - 1,766,728,839.77 Administration Proposed Council Approved 2 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #1 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 10)425,537,408 205,000.00 425,742,408.00 Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00 DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,762,560 1,762,560.00 Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 1,700,000.00 Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,757,825 5,757,825.00 Water Fund (FC 51)132,752,815 132,752,815.00 Sewer Fund (FC 52)255,914,580 255,914,580.00 Storm Water Fund (FC 53)18,699,722 18,699,722.00 Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)384,681,671 384,681,671.00 Refuse Fund (FC 57)24,952,672 24,952,672.00 Golf Fund (FC 59)14,726,016 14,726,016.00 E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385.00 Fleet Fund (FC 61)30,426,032 1,461,793.00 31,887,825.00 IMS Fund (FC 65)30,523,167 9,000.00 30,532,167.00 County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 69)9,458,748 9,458,748.00 CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)4,958,433 4,958,433.00 Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)26,614,153 26,614,153.00 Other Special Revenue (FC 73)300,000 300,000.00 Donation Fund (FC 77)287,250 287,250.00 Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)25,779,253 25,779,253.00 Debt Service Fund (FC 81)33,658,558 33,658,558.00 CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)35,460,387 218,000.00 35,678,387.00 Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,169,767 3,169,767.00 Risk Fund (FC 87)54,679,000 54,679,000.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,525,603,402 1,893,793.00 - - - - 1,527,497,195.00 Budget Manager Analyst, City Council Contingent Appropriation 3 Impact Fees - Summary Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center UnAllocated Cash Notes: Impact fee - Police 8484001 1,402,656$ Impact fee - Fire 8484002 273,684$ B Impact fee - Parks 8484003 16,793,487$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,304,485$ D 24,774,312$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202407 (Jul2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202408 (Aug2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202409 (Sep2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202410 (Oct2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202411 (Nov2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202412 (Dec2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202501 (Jan2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202502 (Feb2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202503 (Mar2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202504 (Apr2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202505 (May2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202506 (Jun2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202507 (Jul2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202508 (Aug2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202509 (Sep2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202510 (Oct2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202511 (Nov2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 1,103,628$ 1,103,628$ 202512 (Dec2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 113,748$ 113,748$ 202601 (Jan2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 3,960$ 3,960$ 202602 (Feb2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 26,929$ 26,929$ 202603 (Mar2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 95,407$ 95,407$ 202604 (Apr2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 1,065,383$ 1,065,383$ 202605 (May2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 95,762$ 95,762$ 202606 (Jun2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 53,972$ 53,972$ Total, Currently Expiring through Jun 2026 -$ -$ -$ 2,558,788$ 2,558,788$ FY 2 0 2 3 Calendar Month FY 2 0 2 4 FY 2 0 2 5 FY 2 0 2 6 Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets Total Impact Fees Confidential Data pulled 07/20/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Police Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Police Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Police Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Police Allocation Remaining Appropriation IFFP Contract - Police 8423003 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ Grand Total 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ A Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Fire Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Fire Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Fire Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Fire Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fire Training Center 8417015 (499,533)$ -$ (499,533)$ -$ Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ -$ 58.00 IFFP Contract - Fire 8423004 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ B IF Excess Capacity - Fire 8423006 2,200,000$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ Grand Total 1,712,546$ 3,021$ 1,700,467$ 9,058.00 Parks Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Parks Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Parks Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Parks Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Parks Allocation Remaining Appropriation Fisher Carriage House 8420130 261,187$ -$ 261,187$ -$ Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 700,000$ -$ 700,000$ -$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 16,959$ 1,705$ 15,254$ -$ JR Boat Ram 8420144 3,337$ -$ 3,337$ -$ RAC Parcel Acquisition 8423454 395,442$ -$ 395,442$ 0$ Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ -$ 42$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,262$ 23,000$ -$ 262$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 9line park 8416005 16,495$ 855$ 13,968$ 1,672$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ 4,328$ -$ 8,103$ FY IFFP Contract - Parks 8423005 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 156,827$ 132,168$ 6,874$ 17,785$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ 253,170$ 21,830$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,042,694$ 240,179$ 764,614$ 37,902$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 56,109$ -$ 1,302$ 54,808$ Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 608,490$ 443,065$ 93,673$ 71,752$ C FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 156,565$ 44,791$ 30,676$ 81,099$ Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 555,030$ 52,760$ 402,270$ 100,000$ Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 254,159$ 133,125$ 13,640$ 107,393$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 122,281$ -$ 1,310$ 120,971$ Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 160,819$ -$ 2,781$ 158,038$ Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ 156,146$ 104,230$ 159,624$ RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 179,323$ -$ 712$ 178,611$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 266,306$ 10,285$ 4,262$ 251,758$ 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 287,848$ -$ -$ 287,848$ Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 300,000$ -$ 678$ 299,322$ Open Space Prop Acq-Trails 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ -$ 319,139$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 428,074$ 5,593$ 23,690$ 398,791$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 446,825$ 18,467$ 14,885$ 413,472$ Open Space Prop Acq-City Parks 8423452 450,000$ -$ -$ 450,000$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ 9,440$ 34,921$ 465,638$ Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 499,563$ -$ 106$ 499,457$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 867,962$ -$ 2,906$ 865,056$ Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 1,000,000$ -$ 3,096$ 996,905$ SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ 41,620$ 62,596$ 1,200,466$ GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,177,849$ 524,018$ 930,050$ 1,723,781$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,149,123$ 69,208$ 94,451$ 2,985,464$ Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000$ -$ -$ 4,350,000$ Grand Total 24,106,716$ 1,913,351$ 4,236,078$ 17,957,287$ Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,292$ -$ 1,292$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 15,026$ 11,703$ 3,323$ -$ Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 13,473$ -$ 13,473$ -$ 900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ 25,398$ -$ -$ Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ -$ 13,000$ -$ 9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 63,955$ -$ 63,955$ -$ Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ -$ Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 12,925$ 940$ 2,244$ Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ 38,084$ 6,316$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ 16,693$ 18,699$ 500 to 700 S 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ D 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 17,300$ 11,746$ 29,734$ 1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$ 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 110,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$ TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 281,586$ 124,068$ 40,300$ 117,218$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 181,846$ -$ 542$ 181,303$ 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 252,000$ -$ -$ 252,000$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 780,182$ 46,269$ 393,884$ 340,029$ IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 836,736$ 55,846$ 45,972$ 734,918$ 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 1,120,000$ -$ 166$ 1,119,834$ 1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 3,111,335$ 1,192,649$ 224,557$ 1,694,129$ Grand Total 8,267,218$ 1,503,600$ 987,926$ 5,775,692$ Total 34,095,480$ 3,419,972$ 6,924,471$ 23,751,037$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 8484002 24,774,312$ 8484003 8484005 16,793,487$ 6,304,485$ $273,684 UnAllocated Budget Amount 8484001 1,402,656$ SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes 2 specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2023. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2023. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form ___ _______ Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2023 (First amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending June 30, 2024. In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes 2 specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2023. ________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________ Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2023. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form ___ _______ Jaysen Oldroyd SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ___ of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of ____________ 2023. ______________________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: _________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________. Mayor’s Action: _________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed. _______________________________________ MAYOR _________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _______ of 2023. Published: __________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM Date:_______7/28/23_____________________ By: ___________________________________ EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Sidewalk closure $394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ___ of 2023 (Amendments to Lane and Sidewalk Closure Fees on the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule) An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule separately address lane closures and sidewalk closures. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances 2011-23, 2011-24 and 2011-25 to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to separately address fees related to lane closures and sidewalk closures as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees and fee information set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees and corresponding fee information set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and that a copy of the amended Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of ____________ 2023. ______________________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: _________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________. Mayor’s Action: _________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed. _______________________________________ MAYOR _________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _______ of 2023. Published: __________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ EXHIBIT A Public Way Obstruction Permits Short term (One Week) Sidewalk Canopy $19 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $50 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $350$98 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane closure $350 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Long term (1 month increments) Sidewalk Canopy $79 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Dumpster/pod $198 Each, Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane or sSidewalk closure $1,400$394 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Lane Closure $1,400 Per Week (Construction barricades) 14.32.405 Signature: Email: Alejandro Sanchez (Aug 3, 2023 09:44 MDT) alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 6/29/2023 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 6/29/2023 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 6/29/2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Police Civilian Review Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Police Civilian Review Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Elizabeth Hanna member of the Police Civilian Review Board. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 June 29, 2023 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Mano, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for: Police Civilian Review Board Elizabeth Hanna to be appointed for a three year term ending the first Monday in September 2026 and starting from date of City Council advice. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor cc: file Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/9/2023 7:53 Jim Webster 1/2 CIP, Miller Bird Refuge I'm a registered Landscape Architect with graduate degrees in riparian analysis and design from Harvard GSD, having taught at the USU Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning. i moved to 938 Military Dr adjacent to Red Butte Creek and Miller Bird Refuge in 1976. Throughout the late 1970's and early 1980's this city oark had been the source of property crime as perpretrators endered our backyards from unimproved public land. In 1986, SLC police urged the administration to respond by providing access within the park as only one deteriorating path on the northwest or Diestel Rd side was available fir oatrol. Under the direction of then Patks Director John Gust the city retained the Mitchell Nelson Group, local landscape architects with extensive experience in riparian parhway design to address this issue. The $75,000 project included a second creekside ADA ompliant path on the Military Dr side of Red Butte creek that incorporated state if the art retention ststems, a new steel bridge with concrete stairs and headwalls, an automated athletic field irrigation system (Toro 640 rotors), stabilizing structural fill and native vegetation along an historic WPA rick wall listed on the Living New Deal Register, streambank protection in accordance with the ity's Riparian Ordinance, and restoration of an historic WPA rock. bridge. In response to the Chevron oil spill in 2010 the Miller Park Committee comprised if resudents living adjacent to the park requested mayor Becker to establish a perpetual maintenance fund to ensure long-term pathway acces as a good will gesture that Chevron officials has already agreed upon. imstead, the mayor and Council decided to retain Biohabitats, a Baltimore firm to demolish the creeksude path, widen the creek ed by 400 % in violation of the city's Rioarian Ordinance and FEMA guidelines, demolish Salt Lake County Flood Control retention structures and Cru-Lock walls installed in 1987. remive mature Black locust heritage trees that had served to stabilize slooes, undercut the WPA rock wall footings to construct a new path that viikated standards of practice and codes, installed arbitrary "drop and pool" check dams with boulders imported from Willard, demolished EPA oil monitoring stations and the irrigation ststem that had ooerated flawlessly for over 35 years. Having heard through secondary sources that the city intended to demolish the creekside path, firmal petitions to oreserve our lower path were signed by resudents and oark vusitors, notibly Sen Farn's wife, Randy Horiuchi. Laural Young as Chair of SLC School District, Board of Regent Gene Hansen and over 100 others. Our appeals, along with the previously approved oark masterplan for future improvements were ignored by Becker and the Council. in 2016, along with Lewis Kogan of Parks and Kirk Huffacre of Preservation Utah I submitted a CIP application to accomplish three basic responses to the city's destruction of Miller Bird Refuge: 1. Reinstate the lower creekside path, Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/9/2023 7:53 Jim Webster 2/2 CONTINUED!! CIP, Miller Bird Refuge 2. Reinstate ADA compliance along the lower oarh and throughout the public park as feasible in compliance with federal standards, and 3. repksce the upper oath with the same soil stabilization that had been in place prior to 2914, including native plants. To date, NONE of these IP approved objectives have been accomplished. Instead, Public Lands has conducted unwarrented studies, continued to remive Black locust drees during nesting season in violation of the federal Migratory Bitd Law, and proposes to spend CIP funding on deferred maintenance and to block off all access to the creek. Minnie Miller dedecated the bird refuge to the children.and fir many years, the creekside oath had been utilized as a resource for the Unitarian pre- school coalition, the Museum of Natural History children's educational program and all five public and private elementary schools. This, along with common sense responses to overwhelming support for the reinstatement of the lower oath were the reasons I submitted the CIP application that the.Councul, including Erin Mendenhall approved. As caretakers of the purse, I appeal to the Council to privide accountability, as checks and bakances to the misapprooriation of CIP funds as nearly 20% of the !425,000 award has already been soent on irrelevant studies and staff overhead. Respectfully, Jim Webster, CIP applicant 8/9/2023 11:47 Kirsten Maclntyre Don't Curtail The Rights of all Citizens to Protect Me - Please Lift all COVID Restrictions Council Chair Chris Wharton, I understand that because I have lived 51 years that I am considered to be at greater risk of becoming ill and even dying from COVID-19. I also understand that if I am suffering from other illnesses, I may be even more vulnerable. Nevertheless— I do not want the freedom of our citizens curtailed in order to protect me. I do not want the schools shut, depriving and frightening our children and youth, when only older people are at serious risk. I do not want people told they cannot work, businesses forced to shut down and churches closed. No one should be told how many people can gather in a private home, and no one should be stopped from crossing state borders whenever they wish. I want a restoration of constitutional rights in America — and an end to the shutdowns and restrictions forced upon us in the name of COVID-19 and protecting those at greater risk. We want our country back! Older Americans care deeply about maintaining their independence, and they value their freedom. We will take care of ourselves, manage our own affairs, and avail ourselves of any voluntary services offered by the community or government, always retaining the right to make our own healthcare choices. We reject living in fear. It breaks our hearts to see Americans made so afraid that they give up their liberty and their freedom to think independently and to openly debate public health measures. We want our children and grandchildren, and all Americans, to live again in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Sincerely, Kirsten MacIntyre Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/9/2023 11:50 Bernie Hart More and More 0 0 0 0 0 0's Councilmembers, It seems that a number of people in the community are questioning your commitment to their vision of what Salt Lake City should look like. The outrageous, seemingly unorganized growth during times of water shortages, the traffic created by the growth and a focus that seems to meet the needs and desires of developers over the needs of others in the community is alarming. As I have pointed out in the past, I am personally troubled by the Council and Mayor's inability to understand and deal with the needs of the mentally ill and addicted homeless in the community. Plans once again are being made that address the desires and needs of downtown business interests and developers over the needs of the most vulnerable in the community. Moving the homeless will not meet their needs, and those needs are better services and more effective programs. Utah Behavioral Health Coalition Master Plan - Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute According to this report no one seems to know what is or isn't working and no one seems committed to finding out what does. Circles. We do and then redo and redo again, offering the same services to the same people over and over again and nothing seems to change. Moving the client or patient in need of help to a different office or community is not going to change the effectiveness of what is being offered. The Utah Legislative Audit on homelessness said pretty much the same thing. And no policymaker that I am aware of seems to have read either...especially members of the Salt Lake City Council, The Salt Lake City Mayor and state leaders chartered to deal with homelessness Why is that? I think I know why. It is because the overall effort is stuck because current programs are not meeting the needs of the most vulnerable in our community and no one has something that will or can upgrade or replace what isn't working. Circles and more circles all leading back to where we started...as we continue to do what by now we should know isn't working. We have a program that seems to be helping a number of people. So what do I do to change the situation? I could expand our program and make claims that are supported by what we have done for the last 8 years....or I can create an awareness about how bad the current system is and hope that policymakers become so uncomfortable they start looking across the street for an answer. Or I could do both. Let's start the process of finding out what does or doesn't work by asking about how effective city funded outreach programs are. Do they help people, and if so how many and what is the cost/benefit ratio? Bernie Hart Salt Lake City, Ut 8/9/2023 12:00 Hoang Nguyen Traffic Calming Sign in Arcadia Heights/D6 Dear Dan, I am writing you as a concerned neighbor in Arcadia Heights. We have an area on Scenic Drive and Lakeline Drive where cars tend to drive faster than is safe for the children and resident that lives and play in the area. At this specific spot on Scenic, there is a slight and brief elevation where cars speed up their momentum to get up the incline. However, drivers are not able to see past the incline as it drops off. There are several homes with young children that tend to play right at the decline and is a blind spot for drivers who can not see the children playing until they get to the top of this incline. I would strongly urge the city to install a permanent traffic calming sign in this area to prevent any accidents or fatalities in this area. Myself and several of the neighbors in this area would be happy to meet you and a representative from transportation on Scenic to show you the situation in person. I look forward to your response and working on a quick and effective solution. Sincerely, Hoang Nguyen Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/9/2023 15:56 Manuel Gonzales Stalking and harrassing Att City Council, In 1997 I worked for Rc Layne Const. while in to my 6 months in Elko Navada I ws accused of being a porterrico theif, from a career supervisor but just be for that day I was sent too a diffrent job away from previllion wadge job then asked too return too tht job too retreive some turn buckle and cow bells for the other job I was sent too. I called Reno n Navada, BBB too talke of the allagation after being said too the boss, I was being insubordantion becaus sent there too retrive these items. I talked too Gary Morfin and he wanted me too let the complanit go because he ws new in business and Bob Couch the owner Of Rc Layne Const. was a big man on the bouard of council and it could bring down problem for Mr Morfin. since 20002 - 20023 I've bee Harrased ,Stalked, talked shit about, and botherd by (Security, and Libary Emploees, over combing of hair , washing of a wash cloth in the sink. all these thing are being instagated by these subject from Elko Navada, Delta Colorado, and some subject who want too sale drugs , prostitute, and hide in and out of the places like Libaray, Stores, church, Parks, Banks, Clinics, and ECT. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/10/2023 9:38 Amy Hawkins (To City Council) very disappointed at new plans to "flex" the Salt Lake City HRCs Dear Salt Lake City Council Members, I am very disappointed to learn that part of the Salt Lake County Winter Response Plan for 2023 - 2024 includes plans to "flex" the Salt Lake City Homeless Resource Centers. These plans violate agreements with the neighborhoods that host the HRCs, the Conditional Use Permits, and Salt Lake City code. The plan calls for St. Vincent de Paul in Salt Lake City’s Rio Grande area to add 65 beds and the three existing homeless resource centers to grow by a combined 175 beds. I've attached the plan to this email. Page 2 includes the plan to flex Salt Lake City’s Homeless Resource Centers. I understand that Salt Lake City code continues to specify that the Homeless Resource Center cap is 200 people (https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/saltlakecityut/latest/saltlakecity_ut/0-0-0-68095). Furthermore, when the Salt Lake City Council passed the Homeless Resource Center Text Amendments this spring, these amendments continued to specify that cap at 200 people and did not change it. Allowing this Winter Overflow policy to move forward and ignore the Conditional Use Permits continues to break trust with the neighborhoods and businesses that accepted and continue to try to find ways to work with and support the Homeless Resource Centers and homeless services. We were repeatedly told that the cap on the number of beds in the shelter was written into the Conditional Use Permit and would not be broken under any circumstances. The Salt Lake City Conditional Use Permit Homeless Resource Centers Security & Operations Plan, written by Shelter the Homeless states on page 2: "Occupancy There are two HRC’s in Salt Lake City. 1. 131 East 700 South – At approximately 60,000 square feet, this facility will host women only. The maximum occupancy of this facility is limited to 200 and will not allow overflow. 2. 242 West Paramount Ave / 275 West High Ave – At approximately 60,000 square feet, this facility will host both men and women. The maximum occupancy of this facility is limited to 200 and will not allow overflow." [emphasis added] If these stipulations in the Conditional Use Permit continue to be ignored, this raises concern about any protections or limitations Salt Lake City may propose for the neighborhood surrounding the Weigand Center, which is now seeking its own Conditional Use Permit. I encourage Council Members to please ask about existing data regarding significant increases in calls for service and certain violent crimes at both the Geraldine King and Gail Miller Homeless Resource Centers when they were "flexed" last winter. I have been told that this data exists but understand it must be GRAMA-requested. The Utah Homeless Council will vote on this plan at their meeting tomorrow, Thursday, August 10th, 2023, from 12:30pm – 3:30pm. I have also attached the agenda for the meeting, which includes a list of the voting members. The voting members include Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Wayne Niederhauser, and many others. I hope you express your strongngconcerns about this proposal; I strongly suggest emailing and calling members of the Utah Homeless Council ASAP, before tomorrow's vote. The meeting will be hybrid (Virtual and In person) and held at: Utah Department of Workforce Services 140 E. 300 S., SLC, UT 84111 Room 211A and B Virtual Meeting Link: https://utah-gov.zoom.us/j/87853722092 Sincerely, Amy J. Hawkins, PhD Chair, Ballpark Community Council Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/10/2023 14:23 Matt Shaum Transient Issues . Good morning, My name is Matt Shaum, I am the facilities manager for Big D Construction Corporation, headquartered at 404 West 400 South Salt Lake City. While we are very aware of the homeless situation all over the valley, I would like to ask what we could do to possibly have a higher police presence in the area during evening hours? I am cleaning up 1-3 areas daily where someone has defecated around our building. While I am currently working on a project to install more lighting around the property, I don’t know if this will help as I have cleaned up messes on the sidewalk and park strip of 400 West and 400 South. If it is possible, I would ask if a patrol is in the area, could they drive through the parking lot? My hope is that the visual presence of more patrols in the area will help detour them from using the planters as a restroom. We very much appreciate all the SLCPD does for everyone to make our town a safe place to live and work. Thank you very much for your time, Sincerely, MATT SHAUM 8/11/2023 10:48 Jeffrey Wood Encampments within the drug free zone and upcoming policy changes. The nearest policy on homelessness has had such a wear and tear on our district especially around the Jordan River trail which is such a beautiful asset. I still enjoy my long walks on the trail but find myself so frustrated when I walk up on someone preparing their drugs in a syringe or seeing brightly colored syringe caps scattered along the trail. The key will be coming up with a policy and way of handling the individuals who don't want to be in a shelter. Can we provide them with a space that insulates the drug use from recreational spaces? I really appreciate the job you and our district one representative do. I know you have our best interest at heart and I know how passionate you and your team are in making the community a better place. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/14/2023 16:54 Mark Rubinfeld 1/3 Important Information and Context About a Serious Problem Dear Honorable Salt Lake City Civil Servants, I have been a downtown Salt Lake City resident since 2003 and this is the first time I have contacted the city government for help. I am sending this in response to the news story that appeared this past weekend in GephardtDaily. I have also copied the GephardtDaily staff in case they wish to follow up on their news story. I could not find an email address for Mayor Mendenhall but after looking at the Salt Lake City Government website, it appears that you may be the appropriate parties for receiving this email. If you are not, please feel free to disregard this email or forward it to anyone you think it should be sent to. Although this email expresses a serious concern which some of you may or may not be aware of, I do want to thank all of you for the invaluable work you are doing on the City's behalf. I have some further information and important context for the below news story about the Salt Lake City Police Department being dispatched to multiple downtown crime scenes from 4:00 to 6:00 this past Saturday morning (August 5th): https://gephardtdaily.com/local/slcpd-dispatched-to-multiple-scenes-in-less-than-2-hours/ My purpose in providing this information is to communicate, not criticize, although because I am in the dark about what may be going on behind the scenes, that is to what degree the Salt Lake City Police Department may be hamstrung by ordinances, laws, orders, or staffing shortages to more effectively deal with the problem I am writing you about beyond responding to the emergency situations after they develop, I am aware that much of what I am communicating may come across as criticism. The news events in this story are not going to stop until Salt Lake City gets to the root cause of the problem. And that is the after- hours Dance Club on W. Market Street that runs from 2:00 to 4:00 in the morning every Friday and Saturday night, and the continued use of the large adjacent parking lot at the corner of Broadway (300 South) and W. Temple Street for all-night partying. This parking lot contains 100 spaces, mostly filled every Friday night and completely filled every Saturday night from 1:00 to 5:00 in the morning, which equates to up-to-100-to-200 people using that parking lot for a free-for-all, open- air, tailgating partying every weekend night that includes public drinking, blasting music, gunning car-and-motorcycle engines, drag races, screaming, yelling, and howling till the last car finally leaves anywhere from six-to-seven in the morning - leaving broken bottles, garbage, drug paraphernalia, and on more than one occasion this summer, passed-out bodies that nobody notices till daybreak when someone finally calls an ambulance to the scene to treat them. Recently, a Food Truck has decided to take advantage of the big crowds and all-night partying, parking on W. Market Street from four- to-five in the morning so the partyers in the parking lot, spilling out after the after-hours Dance Club closes at four in the morning, can have food to eat to go along with their open-air, public drinking and partying till six in the morning. There have already been multiple shootings and one murder at this site this summer including bullet holes found in the Federal Courthouse, gunshots fired over the heads of bicycle patrol officers, and three consecutive nights of shootings (June 3rd, 4th, and 5th) along with the one murder on the night of June 4th. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/14/2023 16:54 Mark Rubinfeld 2/3 CONTINUED! Important Information and Context About a Serious Problem Furthermore, this Dance Club has been open every weekend night from 2:00-to-400 in the morning since last winter with the police called almost every weekend to the parking lot for one reason or another at taxpayers' expense and, even more important, a police manpower shortage to deal with other emergencies. In response to the multiple shootings and the one murder in June, the police finally increased their patrols of this parking lot for several weekends in June and July which included, during those weekends, the parking of twelve police cars from midnight to four in the morning, all with lights flashing, at the north end of the lot to deter more fighting, knifings, and shootings. However, these police cars and the police in these police cars did not seem to be doing much to enforce the noise ordinances - allowing the blasting music, gunning car and motorcycle engines, screaming, yelling, and howling to continue till six in the morning throughout this period of enhanced patrols. In late July, the police ended this part of their enhanced patrol which involved parking their cars in the parking lot from midnight to four in the morning. However, on the weekend of Friday night, August 4th, and Saturday night, August 5th, someone finally did block off the three entrances to that parking lot that helped somewhat by ensuring there was no longer the concentration of the 100 cars - and the 100 to 200 people hanging out outside those cars - using that parking lot for their all-night street party. The very next weekend, that is, this past weekend (August 11th and 12th), the parking lot entrances were no longer blocked off and the parking lot was open, once again, for the all night partying and, it appears from the news story, a resumption of the fighting, knifing, and shootings (with the shootings this time a few blocks over likely being a spillover effect from the all-night partying since the Dance Club and the parking lot are the only reason why downtown Salt Lake City has people hanging out at four, five, and six in the morning as the "to- go-to-place" for all night drinking, partying, and gunning car and motorcycle engines. Meanwhile, the people living in the nearby downtown apartments and condominiums - including those in American Towers right across the street from the parking lot with its some 300-to-400 residential units and its approximately 500-to- 600 residents - have been terrorized every weekend night since the after-hours Dance Club opened last winter. Some have resorted to moving to motels on weekend nights; many others have put their units up for sale (at a significant loss in value) or, for the renters, left to get as far away from downtown as possible. Many of those remaining have stopped bothering to call the non-emergency police number after months of complaining and begging for help because they know, at this point, nobody is doing anything about the situation except responding "after-the-fact" when it escalates to an emergency situation as it did again this past weekend. Otherwise, Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/14/2023 16:54 Mark Rubinfeld 3/3 CONTINUED! Important Information and Context About a Serious Problem it's "party city" downtown every Friday and Saturday night in a city that, apparently, can't bother with enforcing its public drinking and noise ordinances - even when the offences involve blasting music, public drinking, gunning car and motorcycle engines, screaming, yelling, and howling at three, four, five, and six in the morning every weekend morning. Unless Salt Lake City changes whatever laws and ordinances it has that continue to allow this after-hours Dance Club and parking lot to remain open after so many incidences or begins more effectively enforcing the laws and ordinances it already has against loud noises, public drinking, and gunning car and motorcycle engines, there will be more street fights, knifings, shootings, and murders - not to mention, eventually, a deterioration of downtown property values and a mass exit of the thousands of people that have moved to downtown over the last decade to anywhere but downtown. While I don't want to be publicly identified because, like so many of my neighbors, we are worried about retaliation (with good reasons including the fact that there are a lot of people making a lot of money off this after-hours Dance Club and "public nuisance" parking lot), I am willing to provide any further information or details about what I know about this situation and the effect that its having on public safety and quality of life in downtown Salt Lake City. More important, there are hundreds of downtown residents who have not come forward out of fear but, nonetheless, are desperately waiting for some information about what Salt Lake City is doing or planning to do, if anything, about this situation. Sincerely, Mark Rubinfeld 8/14/2023 16:56 Terrell Smith 675 North F Street - Zone Change We have lived in the Historic Avenues for over 55 years and we are strongly opposed to the proposed zone change for 675 North F Street. We have expressed this many times in the past since the proposed changes were first made. Peter Wright, Chairman of the Preserve Our Avenues Coalition outlined many of our neighborhood’s concerns in his August Agenda Article. In addition, we would like to add that Ivory Homes builds cheap, ticky-tacky, unattractive, high density units that would compromise and denigrate the integrity of the historical homes in the Avenues, In addition, building the proposed number of additional units in the Avenues would adversely affect the property values of all real estate in the Avenues. The recent vote by the Avenue residents overwhelmingly rejected the proposed zone change for Ivory’s plans but Ivory Homes continues to push their development and totally disregards our concerns. Please review the number of complaints against Ivory Homes and Fox 13’s Investigation of newly constructed Ivory homes that a quick Google search reveals. There are many. On August 2, 2023, we attended the meeting at the Sweet Library along with many fellow Avenues residents. The residents were there for the town meeting looking for the opportunity to listen to and hear Ivory Home’s presentation on their proposed development. The town meeting was scheduled to discuss this project and proposed change in the zoning requirements but no one from Ivory Homes bothered to attend the meeting to discuss their own project. Their failure to attend the meeting that was scheduled to address their requested zoning changes is telling. Not only was their failure to appear rude and demeaning to the Avenue residents who did attend; by default, Ivory Home’s failure to attend their own town meeting should give the planning commission comfort in denying their request. Sincerely, Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/15/2023 9:27 Judi Short (EXTERNAL) Sugar House CIP Application Wayfinding Signs Project. / D7 The name of the CIP application and the description, did not provide the detail it needed so that you could understand why it is very important that we begin now. Around 2001, Salt Lake City had some signs made, for Downtown and for Sugar House. They are now pink and blue, I don’t know if that was the original color. One example from the front of Whole Foods, is below. The signs are in poor condition. The application you received probably talked about how many there were, they are all over Sugar House, at the Monument, in front of various buildings, even at Sugar House Park. And there were some other black wrought iron signs, big letters that say SUGAR HOUSE, and they are located on prominent corners, like in front of Blue Boutique, and the entrance to the freeway from Highland Drive and 700 East, the corner of 13th East and 2100 South, and every single one is in some state of disrepair. Some have been hit by cars, and then just propped up again. We have a wonderful Sugar House sign that will be installed any minute on the 13th East bridge, to be seen from both directions for people driving I-80. We worked hard to get our Sugar House icons on it. I provided it below. And, you know we have a lot of traffic, and small parking lots that no one can find, and it isn’t always clear if you are a tourist looking for Hidden Hollow, which way you should go. The other part of this project will be smaller (lower) pedestrian friendly signs, for folks walking or riding their bike, to navigate our wonderful place. “It’s a 5- minute walk to Sugar House Park” or “Visitor Parking Here”. Streetcar this way– with an arrow. Plus, we have many small businesses that can be hard to find. Some of these smaller signs will have an electronic component to them with a list of businesses and a map, and a QR code to assist you. Or can learn about The Soup Pantry, where it is and what it is, or the other businesses around, using the QR code. We have at least 5 apartment buildings planned, and probably 5 currently under construction. Our population will increase quite a bit in the next few years. We have to make it easier to navigate our neighborhood. We have learned that trying to do a map of businesses and parking lots takes a lot of time to make and print, and then it is out of date in a week. Using technology, we can provide a good product that is wonderful, rather than an out-of-date map. We are working in combination with the Sugar House Chamber to make sure this works for everyone. The Olympics will come again in 2030 or 2034, and we want to be ready to show off our community, and make it easy for people to get around. We have to begin designing all of this now, which is why we have put in a proposal for a CIP grant to begin to study this issue and figure out how this can make a big impact, without costing piles of money. We hope you will take another look at it. I'm sorry I could not find the application to attach. Judi Short 8/15/2023 10:07 David Stott motorized scooters and bicycles on downtown sidewalks As a senior citizen living and walking the downtown sidewalks, I live with the ongoing fear of being struck and seriously injured by the thoughtless, indifferent persons who ride motorized scooters or bikes on the downtown sidewalks at relative high speed with no regard for pedestrians. When approaching from behind, they give no warning before blowing by and ignore what would happen if the pedestrian stumbled or moved even inches in their direction. If approaching from the front the relative speed is of course even greater and any impact deadlier, yet many of these riders actually yell at the pedestrian because he or she did not move off the sidewalk quickly enough. The indifference of these people is an outrage and a danger to the public safety. Although I belreve there is a city ordinance prohibting these vehicles from using downtown sidewalks, I have never witnessed enforcement of any kind. Can nothing be done about this? Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 8/15/2023 11:08 John Kennedy Ivory development at 675 N F Street, SLC Dear Mr. Barlow and the Salt Lake City Planning Division and Commission: As a neighbor living adjacent to the subject property, I am writing to object to the planned development proposal of Ivory Homes for the above address. From my perspective, Ivory's proposal has no redeeming qualities which would justify deviation from the current SR1 zoning restrictions. I cannot see any public benefit in the Ivory proposal. It certainly does not create "an enhanced product," required by existing standards for approval of a planned development. I list here only a few of my concerns: Ivory has suggested that its plan creates "trails" and also "preserves open spaces." Sidewalks around a packed development cannot be viewed as "trails." They are just that: sidewalks. In addition, the Ivory plan for "green space" includes property which belongs to the City now along F Street and other property which the City has required as a storm-water impound area. Ivory's plan will require the removal of virtually all of the existing mature trees on the site (including hawk nesting locations). I am unaware of any other non-apartment residential parcel in the Avenues which contains a lower percentage of green space compared with that of Ivory's plan. Moreover, Ivory's claim that its planned development proposal should be approved to allow for ADUs is without any factual basis. The existing SR1 zoning would permit a homeowner to create an ADU without the proposed planned development. These very expensive "cottages" are about 90 feet long and 18-20 feet wide, with non-conforming lot sizes and set- backs, with no yards or recreation areas. Parking for guests and residents is totally inadequate, not to mention the lack of areas for capturing snow removal. This plan simply does not fit in this Avenues neighborhood. Approval of such a plan by the Division and/or the Commission would be arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to existing law. It should be rejected. -- John Kennedy 8/15/2023 11:29 Heather Wilkins Removing Drive- throughs Dear Council. Many of our newer council members, aren't from Utah. Some of them are. As many of you know Sugarhouse thrives when there is an open business and residential market. That Includes large families, children, dialogs, elderly poeple ect. Drive through, restuarants bri g poeple through who are working on breaks, large families, travelers etc. Sugarhouse isn't just a closed city business area, there are poeple who come from out of state. We get really hot weather, icy cold belove freezing weather. Not only is focusing on everyone getting out if their cars and walking a bad idea. It won't work. You think everyone who comes to Sugarhouse rides a scooter or walks? No. Sugarhouse is a smaller historic town in between a freeway and larger city. It's not even a town where concerts are held. Drive-thru's are ways for poeple to get some dinner and be on their way. Pulling them out will destroy business and eventually poeple will stop coming in the this small area and drive down your economy. Poeple don't have hours to walk around in the heat, or ice cold for fun. I highly recommend you use money in our budgets to clean up your pot holes, your homeless kneedles and focus on what makes this area, of great poeple special?? It's our beautiful parks, and kind hearted family's with children and dogs that need to be supported. Cars are not destroying our environments, protestors, and angry adults and poeple destroying properties are destroying our world. Thanks for your time!! 8/15/2023 15:01 Camille Thorpe General Comment My thanks to council member mono and city council staff for coming to richards st. 8/15/2023 15:14 Camille Thorpe CIP Pickleball Proposal I want to see mroe pickleball courts in the Salt Lake Avenue