The URL can be used to link to this page

04/18/2023 - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL and LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY FORMAL MEETING AGENDA April 18, 2023 Tuesday 7:00 PM Utah State Fair Park 155 North 1000 West, Pioneer Room Salt Lake City, UT 84116 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Darin Mano, Chair District 5 Victoria Petro, Vice Chair District 1 Alejandro Puy District 2 Chris Wharton District 3 Ana Valdemoros District 4 Dan Dugan District 6 Amy Fowler District 7 Generated: 08:48:37 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY 1.Board/Council Member Victoria Petro will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. B.LBA CONSENT: 1. Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Board will set the dates of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2023-24 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 7, 2023, and February 14, 2023, as well as the formal meeting minutes of February 7, 2023. 3.YouthCity Government will present the Youth State of the City Address. E.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items E1 – E12 will be heard as one public hearing 1. Grant Application: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from Housing Stability to the Department of Homeland Security. If awarded, the grant would fund seismic improvements on private single-family dwellings. The 2022 application includes duplexes and recruitment of homeowners who qualify as having low to moderate income. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2. Grant Application: 2022 Public Art Challenge: Wake the Great Salt Lake Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Salt Lake City Arts Council to the Bloomberg Philanthropies. If awarded, the grant would fund A series of 3-5 major artworks across the City created by world-renowned artists. These artists will be selected with the intention of leveraging their notoriety and practice while bringing awareness of our water conservation, air quality, ecology of the lake, and environmental and social justice. A series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists and organizations in a multiplicity of disciplines will also be commissioned. The grant would also fund a part-time curator position and a part-time project coordinator. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 3. Grant Application: Consumer Recycling Education and Outreach Grant Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Waste and Recycling to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If awarded, the grant would fund four part-time Education Specialists to conduct reuse, reduce, and recycle presentations at community events, schools, and businesses; staff tabling events; monitor curbside recycling and green waste can contamination weekly on Westside routes; assist community recycling collection events; train Recycling Ambassadors; and support campaign outreach. It would also fund overtime for two Waste Recycling Equipment Operators to load and transport electronic (e-) waste collected at community recycling events to a disposal facility. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 4. Grant Application: Marathon Community Investments Program Grant: YouthCity Teen Program Transportation Solutions The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth & Family Services to the Marathon Petroleum Foundation. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of one 14-passenger van for YouthCity Northwest Teen programs. The van would be used to transport YouthCity Northwest Teen participants from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the Northwest Community Center, which is the site for YouthCity Northwest Teen programming. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 5. Grant Application: First Responder Mental Health Services Grant: Wellness and Peer Support Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of three NeurOptimal and Neurofeedback systems for use in its Wellness and Peer Support Program. These systems are being used to improve symptoms of post- traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, anxiety, trauma, panic, depression, and more. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 6. Grant Application: Leading City Procurement Reform Grant: Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Purchasing and Contract Management to the Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard. If awarded, the grant would fund training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 7. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Sorenson Unity Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sorenson Unity Center summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 8. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 9. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Ottinger Hall The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Ottinger Hall summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 10. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Liberty Park The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Liberty Park summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 11. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Fairmont Park The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Fairmont Park summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 12. Grant Application: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant for YouthCity Programming at Central City The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth and Family Services to the Utah Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund the Central City summer youth program general operating expenses. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 13. Ordinance: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 (Form based districts). Additionally, the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures, while developing standards for public spaces. The Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. Petitioner: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00529. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/downtownbuildingheights FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 14. Ordinance: Rezone at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M- 1 (Light Manufacturing District) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use District). The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. No development plans have been submitted at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The properties are within Council District 2. Petitioner: Cameron Broadbent, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00587 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 15. Ordinance: Airport Title 16 Amendments The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would repeal and replace Title 16 of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Airports. The proposed amendment would eliminate duplicate and outdated regulations. Changes also include moving codified commercial standards to standalone administrative documents for operators doing business at the airport. Language related to ground transportation rules and fees is removed where it’s duplicated on the City’s ordinance regulating business (Title 5). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). F.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Homeless Resource Center Text Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would establish a process for approving future Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) in the City and modify existing standards for homeless resource centers and homeless shelters. The Council may amend other related chapters and sections of Title 21A Zoning as part of this proposal. This petition was initiated by the City Council through Ordinance 15B of 2022. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01068 The proposal includes: •A Homeless Resource Center Overlay Zoning District; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.36.350 Standards for Homeless Resource Centers; •Provisions for temporary/seasonal homeless resource centers that incorporate recent changes to Utah Code; •Modifications to city ordinance 21A.50 to include additional considerations when mapping the HRC overlay and other related changes; and •Updated defined terms. For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/HRCTextAmendment FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2023-24 The Council will consider an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 21, 2023; Tuesday, April 4, 2023 and Tuesday, April 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 865 South 500 East The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of property at 865 South 500 East Street from RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial District), this would also amend the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The intent of the rezone request is to allow for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling on the property to a commercial use. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The property is located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Rick Service, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00301 & PLNPCM2022-00302 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 and Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). G.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) H.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Convention and Tourism Assessment Area The Council will consider adopting a resolution consenting to inclusion in Salt Lake County’s proposed Convention and Tourism Business Assessment Area (CTAA). The Salt Lake County Convention and Tourism Assessment Area (SLCo CTAA) is an assessment area proposed to provide specific benefits to payors, by funding district wide development & programming, and community and sales development with regional incentives programs for assessed lodging establishments. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). J.CONSENT: 1. Ordinances relating to Fiscal Year 2023-24 City Budget, including the budget for the Library Fund The Council will set the dates of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment regarding an ordinance adopting the final budget and the employment staffing document for Salt Lake City, Utah and related ordinances for Fiscal Year 2023-24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 16, 2023 and Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2022-23. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for adapting the Seven Canyons Fountain at Liberty Park into a dry art piece, a roof replacement for the Steiner Aquatics Center, and several proposals to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for revenue replacement and a $10 million contribution to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah among other items. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY23 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 2, 2023 TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3. Ordinance: Early Notification Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would approve various changes to the Salt Lake City Code relating to early notification of the public and recognized community organizations for land use projects. The Council initiated this petition to clarify early notification regulations and public outreach. The purpose of the proposed changes is to increase awareness and participation by the public for various types of City projects while still providing a timely review process for applicants. Related provisions of the City Code may also be amended as part of this petition. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, September 29, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 11, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 4, 2020; Tuesday, September 15, 2020; Tuesday, November 16, 2021; and Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 3, 2020; Tuesday, October 6, 2020; Tuesday, October 20, 2020; Tuesday, December 7, 2021; and Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 6, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4. Board Reappointment: Sister Cities Board – M. Nicole Pessetto The Council will consider approving the reappointment of M. Nicole Pessetto to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 2, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 18, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. K.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 13, 2023, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, February 7, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Michelle Barney – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Blake Thomas – Community & Neighborhoods Director, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Nick Norris – Planning Director, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Katherine Maus – Public Lands Planner, Kelsey Lindquist – Planning Manager, Mark Stephens – City Engineer, JP Goats – Deputy Director, Public Services, Jorge Chamorro – Director of Public Services, Kristina Gilmore – Senior Planner, Michael McNamee – Principal Planner, Tammy Hunsaker – Deputy Director, Community and Neighborhood Services, Ashley Lichtle – Community Liason, Eva Lopez – Community Liason, Michelle Mooney – Equity Manager, Damian Choi – Chief Equity Officer, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff The meeting was called to order at 2:05 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 1 Work Session Items 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Lindsey Nikola provided information regarding: COVID-19 Updates • Cases were down 15% in the U.S. and Utah cases were up 17% over the last two weeks • Vaccination/booster locations/information Eva Lopez provided information regarding: Community Engagement Highlights • Ways to engage with the City found at www.slc.gov/feedback/ • Resident Food Equity Advisors – Food Equity Micro grant – https://www,slcgov/sustainability/food-equity-grant/ • Public Utilities – Big Cottonwood Canyon Treatment Plant Rebuild was in the early stages of development and would include public engagement and advisory council • Mayor’s Office Community Office Hours Andrew Johnston provided information regarding: Homelessness Update • Homeless Resource Center bed/shelter availability/occupancy information • Rapid Intervention Team (RIT)/Encampment Impact Mitigation (EIM) outreach information Council Members and Andrew Johnston discussed the capacity rates being impacted by facility staffing, homeless statistics from 2021 versus 2022, how transportation assisted with the use of shelters. Council Members stated they hoped the public stayed active in pushing for change/help for homelessness as the State Legislature was currently looking at homelessness and it was important to have the public involved in the process. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 2 The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of Equity and Inclusion. These initiatives include, but are not limited to, improving racial equity and justice in policing. Discussion may also include updates on the City's other work to achieve equitable service delivery, decision-making, and community engagement through the Citywide Equity Plan, increased ADA resources, language access, and other topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial Equity in Policing Commission. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Damian Choi and Michelle Mooney introduced themselves. Michelle Mooney and Damian Choi presented the Homeless Resource Center (HRC) report including: Work with Mayor with City Council to adopt and codify Commission on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) • Partner with internal stakeholders to conduct Thriving in Place study • Review and adopt Language Access Policy and joint resolution • Update and re-launch the commission website HRC 2023 Goals: • Build framework for Intersectional Gender Equity Analysis and develop CEDAW Taskforce • Participation in Salt Lake Valley Commission to End Homelessness • Address geographic inequity, evaluate Thriving in Place and provide recommendations • Create procedure for consistent data collection of ethnic/racial demographics to align with federal census guidelines • Establish a children/youth advocacy subcommittee Racial Equity Plan – C Annual Report Complete: • Work with Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD) to complete more than 75% of Phase I recommendations (6 items in progress, 2 incomplete) • Hire a Senior Education Advisor for Mayor’s Office to re-negotiate a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for School Resource Officers (SROs) • Recommend final Salt Lake City Community-Based Trainers of Color to conduct training for SLCPD • Increase staffing for the co-response team • Update and re-launch the commission website 2023 Goals: • Partner with ADC to facilitate Neurodiversity/Sensory Needs Subcommittee MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 3 2.Informational: Equity Update 2:15 p.m. 20 min. • Review the current structure of the Civilian Review Board and evaluate national models ◦ Coordinate community listening sessions led by the Racial Equity in Policing (REP) Commissioners • Recommend budgetary/allotment for mental health professionals and victim advocates ◦ Providing culturally responsive therapy to victims of families who have experienced negative police interactions Council Members and Michelle Mooney discussed if the money allocated for therapy was earmarked for specific individuals and why the funding was part of the Police Department budget. Council thanked the Staff for all the work with Racial Equity in Policing. 3.Ordinance: Public Accommodation Closed Captioning ~ 2:35 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would activate closed captioning on televisions in public areas. Closed captioning can provide better access for veterans with hearing loss, the elderly, people with autism or sensory disabilities, ADHD, dyslexia, learning disabilities, down syndrome and auditory neuropathy, and people who are learning English as a second language or are limited English proficient (LEP). In a noisy environment, hearing people can benefit from having the captions turned on and such enhanced access can be helpful when there's an emergency broadcast. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Ashley Lichtle presented the proposed ordinance for activation of closed captioning on television in public areas. Council Members and Ashley Lichtle discussed the City ordinance requirements for businesses with public facing televisions to provide closed captioning and noted it was a free opportunity for businesses to be more inclusive. Mary Bonham (American Sign Language Interpreter) was present to translate. Pamela Mower (Accessibility and Disability Commissioner) and Stephen Persinger (Accessibility and Disability Commissioner) thanked the Council for giving them the opportunity to be at the meeting, explained how closed captioning benefited all communities and the possibility of drawing more deaf and hard of hearing individuals into Salt Lake City. Council Members and Ashley Lichtle discussed: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 4 • Public education process to announce the ordinance • Option to use business licensing for the notification process • Including the Airport in the notifications • Expressed excitement to see Boards and Commissions coming to the Council with direct policy recommendations • Ensuring the ordinance could not be used to target business owners that may not know that it exists Council Members expressed willingness to help notify businesses owners of the ordinance. Pamela Mower stated educating the deaf and hard of hearing on how to approach businesses, that may not be aware of the ordinance, as well as work with Work Force Services to educate people would help to address the concern of businesses being targeted. Council Members and Ashley Lichtle discussed the current Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements to turn on closed captioning (if requested), being a learning opportunity to educate businesses to be more inclusive. Kayci Lynam (Accessibility and Disability Commissioner) expressed excitement for the ordinance and asked that every business increase the closed caption text size for those that have vision issues and to be trained for emergency preparedness. Council Members, Ashley Litchtle, and Damian Choi discussed the status of translating City documents, prioritizing which documents needed to be translated, and the importance of doing it accurately. Council Member Puy expressed willingness to help translate documents. 4.Informational: Land Exchange to Facilitate the Bridge to Backman Project ~ 2:55 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a transfer of certain Open Space Lands owned by Salt Lake City located at 592 N. Riverside Drive for $0 to Riverwood Cove, LLC in exchange for another open space parcel of equal size. This exchange will facilitate the development of a new public park, a community outdoor classroom, and a new walking and bicycling connection to/from Backman Elementary School for Backman Elementary School students, and will resolve a current encroachment issue. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 and Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - tbd MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 5 Ben Luedtke gave a brief introduction to the proposed land swap negotiated between the City and a private land owner, location of the property, what was included in the project and the City requirements for removing open space. Council Member Mano clarified the Council’s Role in the process was advisory only, and the zoning of the parcels included in the land swap. Tammy Hunsaker and Kat Maus presented the proposal including: • The proposal was for a land swap to finalize the Bridge to Backman project • Use of the property and what was included in the proposal • Property was roughly 2,473 square feet or .057 acres • Project was to resolve utility and access issues and resulted in no net loss of open space • Open space removal process • Public outreach for the proposal including a newspaper notice Council Members, Ben Luedtke,Tammy Hunsaker and Kat Maus discussed: • Adjacent parking lot ownership • Setbacks for the project • Noticing requirements • Newspaper noticing and if it should be updated • Streamlining the process for land swapping green space when there was no loss of open space • Funding for the project • If the land swap was planned from the start of the project 5.Ordinance: Right of Way Permit Notification Fee ~ 3:15 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend notice requirements for work in the public way permits and impose a fee related to such notices. If adopted, the fee associated with the pre-notification postcards would be in the existing Consolidated Fee Schedule so that the appropriate fees can be assessed to the public way permit applicant along with the other required public way permit fees prior to approval and issuance of the permit. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Sylvia Richards reviewed the proposal to change the Consolidated Fee Schedule specifically adding a fee for the cost of notifying adjacent properties when work MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 6 was done in the public right of way. Mark Stephens, JP Goats and Jorge Chamorro discussed: • The impacts to neighboring/adjacent properties when work was done in the public right of way • Options for notifying residents • Cost of the notification ($11.53 with labor or $3.49 without) • The benefits of having City Staff oversee and create the notifications Council Members, Sylvia Richards, Mark Stephens, JP Goats and Jorge Chamorro discussed: • If land use applications were charged a similar fee • Postcards provided consistency with other notifications in the City • Noticing – full burden price should be charged, City logo was important but not necessary to be on the notice • Regulations if applicants chose to do the noticing themselves • The cost for the notices and how to make it less burdensome to ensure the ordinance was followed • The possibility to remove the option of an applicant providing their own notices; requiring applicants to use the City for noticing purposes • Requirements for providing verification of noticing if the applicant chooses to do it themselves • Whether or not to allow applicants to provide notifications Council Members wanted answers to the following: • Cost of a Planning Permit • Did Planning have an option for the applicant to print notifications • Ways to recoup City costs associated with applicants providing noticing • If the option for applicants to provide noticing could be removed 6.Informational: Transparency in the Housing Stability Division Budget ~ 3:35 p.m. 45 min. The Council will receive a briefing on the Administration’s process of aligning budget and procedural practices in several Housing Stability Division programs with current City best practices. The objective is to improve transparency and budgeting processes, particularly for the Home Rehabilitation, Homebuyer, and Community Land Trust programs, which are complex and use both federal and local funds. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 7 Allison Rowland presented the ongoing internal review that as of November 30, 2022, resulted in the location of $20,412,990 in dormant program income and other funds that were incorrectly accounted for by the Housing Stability Division of the Community and Neighborhoods Department (CAN). Allison Rowland reviewed what the funds were related to, how they were overlooked (tracking issues) as well as the Administration’s recommended process improvements to ensure financial transparency in the future. Blake Thomas and Tammy Hunsaker presented the Housing Stability Program and Budget Transparency including: • Grant administration and program delivery • Past issues with tracking and transparency • Proposed policies to correct the issues • Budget and Funds • Process Improvements ◦ Establish formal policies and procedures ◦ Increase budget transparency ◦ Align with the Open and Public Meeting Act ◦ Establish a Homeowner Revolving Loan Fund • Housing roles and responsibilities • Next steps Council Members, Allison Rowland, Blake Thomas and Tammy Hunsaker discussed: • How the homeowner buying program worked and how funds would be allocated in the proposed revolving loan fund • The benefit of City loans to the homebuyer • The process of acquiring homes for the program • The review process and allotted funding for issuing home loans • City Council’s role in the process • Who would use the revolving loan fund • Services the home repair program provided that would also be part of the revolving loan fund • Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations/restrictions on funding • Possibilities of having to return funding to HUD • Community land trust regulations and funding • Money to acquire land was provided by HUD and other funds that existed from previous programs • Who decided which properties to acquire • Funds that were/were not subject to HUD requirements • Determining what services the City should/should not provide • How the fund related to the Mayor’s perpetual housing fund • Redevelopment Agency’s, Community Development and Housing Stability’s roles in working with different entities regarding housing and outlining demographics for each division • Options for properly funding housing programs • The City’s Housing Plan would need revisions • Increased pressure from the community for cities to take action on housing issues MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8 • The proposed solutions (outlined in the Staff Report) for the problem being appropriate FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a 8.Ordinance: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Text Amendment Follow-up ~ 4:40 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations. The proposed code revisions would eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential zones. They would also aim to lower zoning barriers to construction of ADUs in general. The proposed changes would seek to strike a better balance between encouraging construction of ADUs and mitigating impacts to neighboring properties. For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/ADUTextAmendment FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 and Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Brian Fullmer presented the proposal including: • Prior discussion held on January 17, 2023 was a briefing where Council focused the discussion on parking requirements, maximum Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) size, owner occupancy, required setbacks and conditional use requirements • Potential straw polls listed in the Staff report (located in the meeting materials) • Public hearing was scheduled for the February 7, 2023 Formal Meeting Council Members, Brian Fullmer, Michael McNamee and Nick Norris discussed: • The meaning of a straw poll • Public comments on the proposal • Off-street parking MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 9 7.Tentative Break ~ 4:20 p.m. 20 min. • Whether or not to remove or keep the requirements in the ordinance Straw Poll Support for keeping the minimum of one off-street parking space with the exception of being within a quarter-mile of a transit stop. Supported by Council Members Fowler, Puy, Valdemoros, Petro, and Mano. Council Members Wharton and Dugan did not support the straw poll. Council Members expressed their reasoning for supporting/not supporting the straw poll. Council Members discussed the bike lane exception. Straw Poll Support for requiring one off-street parking space and remove the exception in relation to bike lanes. Supported by Council Members Wharton, Valdemoros and Dugan. Council Members Puy, Fowler, Petro and Mano did not support the straw poll. Council Members discussed: • Whether or not to remove the requirement for off-street parking if on street parking was available • Options to address larger blocks with accessible parking where additional vehicles could be accommodated Nick Norris explained how the zoning ordinance addressed parking including on and off- street. Straw Poll Support for removing the exception of on-street parking. Supported by Council Members Puy, Wharton, Mano, Fowler and Dugan. Council Member Petro did not support the straw poll. Council Member Valdemoros did not vote. Council Members and Michael McNamee discussed: • If Council wished to increase the maximum size of ADUs on larger properties • Why the 720 and 1,000 square foot sizes were chosen • The idea was not to create family housing but more housing in general, however; the need for family housing in communities existed Straw Poll Support for setting the 1,000 square foot minimum requirement. Supported by Council Members Puy, Petro, Mano and Valdemoros. Council Members Fowler, Wharton and Dugan did not support the straw poll. Straw Poll Support to remove the 12,000 square foot option. Supported by all Council Members present. Council Members discussed: • Whether or not to maintain the current owner occupancy requirement MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 10 • Short-term rental discussion at the Legislature and how it would affect owner occupancy • Concerns over regulating possible short-term rentals created with the development of ADUs • Keeping with the intent that ADUs were another tool to create housing stock in the City • Constituents statements as to why ADUs would help the community • The need to protect renters in the City • Neighborhoods needed a mix of renters and homeowners • Owner occupancy created a buy-in with development that matched the neighborhood • Need to ensure the resulting ordinance promoted ADU development • Placing a stipulation for reporting on ADUs to review the effects of the ordinance on development Straw Poll Support for removing the owner occupancy requirement. Supported by Council Members Mano and Puy. Council Members Valdemoros, Fowler, Dugan, Petro and Wharton did not support the straw poll. Straw Poll Support to keep the owner occupancy requirement and ask the Planning Department to report back on the number of ADUs constructed and why the numbers were lower than expected. – No vote was taken. Council Members and Nick Norris discussed: • Current reporting requirement on construction of ADUs • Whether or not to support the proposed setback requirements • Changing the 10 foot setback to accommodate wider lots • The process of determining allowable building height Straw Poll Support to change the corner yard set back to 20% of the width of the lot or a 10 foot setback (which ever was less). Supported by all Council Members present. Straw Poll Support for the setback as suggested by the Planning Department. Supported by Council Members Mano, Valdemoros, Fowler, Petro, Wharton and Puy. Council Member Dugan did not support the straw poll. Council Members discussed removing the conditional use permit requirement. Straw poll Support for making ADUs a permitted use. Supported by all Council Members present. Council Members, Nick Norris and Michael McNamee discussed: • Height of an ADUs in comparison to the height requirements of a detached garage which varied in the different zones • Whether to allow ADUs to be taller than the primary building MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11 • Setback requirements for ADUs above detached garages • How grade changes affected the construction of ADUs • Height restrictions and the maximum allowable height of ADUs Straw Poll Supporting that an ADU could not be higher than a primary dwelling. Supported by Council Members Dugan and Valdemoros. Council Members Mano, Fowler, Petro, Wharton and Puy did not support the straw poll. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning map pertaining to a parcel at approximately 130 North 2100 West to remove the AFPP (Airport Flight Path Protection) Overlay District Influence Zone B. The property is currently occupied by a hotel building and associated parking. The desired result is to allow the building to operate as permanent supportive housing primarily for those ages 62 and older. Petitioner: Friends of Switchpoint. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Brian Fullmer presented the proposal including: • Remove the property at 130 North 2100 West from the Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone B • Petitioner’s request to expand the existing hotel at 130 North 2100 West for use as permanent supportive housing with a focus on older individuals transitioning out of homelessness • Under the proposal 94 residential units would be created with kitchens, bathroom facilities and community amenities • Zoning of the property and how it affected the proposal • Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation for the proposal Krissy Gilmore and Kelsey Lindquist presented the proposal including: • Project Request to remove the property at 130 North 2100 W from the Airport Flight Path Protection Influence Zone B • Key Considerations – Equity concerns, need for deeply affordable housing, noise study provided by the applicant, access to transit, not incompatible with neighboring properties (no negative impacts), suggested condition of approval • The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council with the following condition: ◦ A development agreement shall be recorded on the property that requires any new development or substantial remodel of existing development to be constructed with air circulation systems of at least thirty (30) dBs of sound attenuation in sleeping areas and at least twenty-five (25) dBs of sound MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 12 9.Ordinance: Rezone at approximately 130 North 2100 West ~ 5:10 p.m. attenuation elsewhere Council Members, Brian Fullmer, Krissy Gilmore and Kelsey Lindquist discussed: • The level of noise from the freeway versus the airport • With the finding of the study would it be worth considering opening up a larger area for development • Would need to work with the Airport on future development • It was better to rezone properties on a case-by-case basis to ensure sound was not an issue • Asking the developer to plant trees to help with the sound levels • Meeting held between the Applicant and Council Members to address the airport overlay zoning Jason Wheeler (ASSIT Inc.) and Carol Hollowell (Friends with Switchpoint) thanked the Council for helping address the airport overlay issues and stated/reviewed: • The sound levels from the freeway versus the airport • Access from the property to transit and other downtown amenities benefited the site and proposed use • Project was a great addition to housing for the homeless • Funding for the project • Who the development would support Council Members, Jason Wheeler and Carol Hollowell discussed: • Planting trees and eliminating large amounts of grass • Possibility of expediting the permit process • The requirement for a public hearing • What would be done with the property if the zoning was not approved Circulation Plan 30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed update to the 2013 Sugar House Circulation Plan for walking, biking, and public transit within and through the business district. The Local Link study has project and program recommendations, and a Transit Alternatives Analysis evaluating various transit options including streetcar extensions connecting the Sugar House Business District to the Brickyard, Millcreek, and Holladay. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/transportationslc FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 13 10. Ordinance: Local Link Study Update to 2013 Sugar House ~ 5:30 p.m. Moved to a future agenda. 11.Informational: State of Utah Fraud Risk Assessment for 2022 ~ 6:00 p.m. 10 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the Administration on the 2022 official Fraud Risk Assessment. This report is required to be presented to the legislative body by State law. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Mary Beth Thompson reviewed the risk assessment according to the State Auditor’s report. Council Members thanked Mary Beth Thompson for keeping the City where it needed to be. 12.Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Julie Bjornstad ~ 6:10 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Julie Bjornstad prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29, 2025. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Interview held. Council Member Mano said Julie Bjornstad’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. Standing Items 13.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 14 Report of Chair and Vice Chair. No report. 14.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to: • Notification of removal of Artworks from the City’s Public Art Collection; • Feedback Request on Parks, Trails and Open Space Bond; and • Scheduling Items. Cindy Gust-Jenson stated there were a number of announcements Notification of removal of Artworks from the City’s Public Art Collection • The Mayor approved the recommendation from the Salt Lake Art Design Board to remove the following artworks from the City’s public art collection: ◦ Bench sculpture of Untitled at Bend in the River by Paul Heath, Linda Nowlin, Louise Fischman, and Wayne Geary located in Modesto Park at Jordan River Parkway, 1550 S 1110 W ◦ Three concrete furniture sculptures, Sugar House Benches, by Eric Thelander located in front of Fairmont Aquatic Center, Sprague Library, and 2005 South 1100 East The recommendations are based on multiple factors, including a lack of structural integrity, repeated and ongoing issues with vandalism, unreasonable costs for repair and maintenance, and safety concerns. An informational transmittal was received in the Council Office on January 18 satisfying the 45-day advance notice requirement in City Code before an artwork in the City’s collection may be removed. Council Members would like information on what happened when arts were decommissioned and would like to know more about the process. Feedback Requested on Neighborhood Parks Projects in the $85 Million Parks, Trails and Open Space Bond Council Member feedback is welcome as the Administration is preparing a transmittal on next steps for the bond, especially as it relates to using the $10.5 million for improvements to neighborhood parks with at least one in each Council District. Would the Council prefer to hold a discussion in a future Work Session, or Small group meetings with the Administration to discuss options for how to select locations / projects for these Neighborhood Parks. Once a process and project list is prepared, the Council would need to hold a public hearing and approve the use of bond funds in a budget opening for the City to spend the funds. Please reach out to Ben Luedtke or your Liaison with any feedback. Council Members would like to hold small group meetings and then have larger discussions in a Work Session. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 15 Priorities for the Internal Budget Review Committee The Administration has invited the Council to submit priorities for their internal Budget review committee as they build and consider the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY 24. This is a unique opportunity for the legislative branch to provide early input on the Administration’s budget (typically a fully Administrative process). The Chair and Vice Chair have discussed this with staff, edited priorities from last year, and pulled from themes from the Council’s retreat in January. The list is as follows: Equity, Stabilizing and Optimizing Response models, Homelessness, Maintenance of Public Spaces, Transit and Transportation, Land Use & Development, Affordable Housing, Business Support/Economic Development, emphasize stability of current programs instead of creating new ones. This list would be incorporated into the Administration’s budget review matrix that is used to evaluate and score individual department budget recommendations. The Budget committee is meeting this Thursday so the Council has a quick turnaround to provide this input. Please let staff or the Chair Vice Chair know if you have any concerns or questions with this list. Information Needed: Council Representative to the Utah League of Cities and Town Legislative Policy Committee. Currently Council Members Fowler and Dugan are two of the city’s three voting members of ULCT LPC. (Rachel Otto is the other vote) Council Member Fowler would like to resign her position and recommends giving it to one of the members of the Council Legislative Subcommittee (Currently Council Members Petro, Puy and Dugan). Are any other Council Member interested in serving on the LPC? Council Members agreed Council Member Petro would take the position. City’s Grant Applications & Process Council Members raised some questions about the current grant applications, criteria for evaluation, and process on the Council agenda. In order to gather direction, the Chair and Vice Chair wanted to convene a "subcommittee" that could meet in a small group meeting with Staff. The subcommittee would review the options for any new criteria or processing (i.e. adding a Work Session briefing for some grant applications) and then bring back a proposal for the full Council to review. Which Council Members are interested in participating? Council Members agreed to allow Council Staff to determine which grant applications to bring to the Council for discussion. Council Members wanted the information on the grants to be concise and manageable. Cindy Gust-Jenson reviewed the grant application for six charging stations and stated staff would return to the Council with answers regarding the proposal. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 16 b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 17 - - 15.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or ment health of an individual; Closed Session and adjourn. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 18 A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Closed Session Started at 6:26 pm Held via Webex and in the Work Session Room (location) Council Members in Attendance: Council Members Dugan, Fowler, Petro, Puy, Mano, Wharton and Valdemoros City Staff in Attendance: Katherine Lewis, Mike Lee, Rachel Otto, Danny Walz, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Sam Owen, Lehua Weaver, Tracy Fletcher, Taylor Hill, Scott Corpany, Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, and Cindy Lou Trishman. Closed Session ended at 7: 05 pm Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Wharton to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation, strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, and attorney-client matters. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to exit Meeting adjourned at 7:05 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, February 7, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 19 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, February 14, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lisa Shaffer – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Blake Thomas – Community & Neighborhoods Director, Danny Walz – Chief Operating Officer RDA, Kristin Riker – Public Lands Department Director, Lorena Riffo Jenson – Deputy Director Economic Development, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Tim Cosgrove – Community Liaison, Ashley Cleveland – Mayor's Senior Advisor, Tammy Hunsaker – Deputy Director of Community Services, Ruedigar Matthes – Community & Neighborhoods Project & Policy Manager, Tony Milner – Housing Stability Director, Jonathan Larsen – Transportation Director, Katie Matheson – Economic Development Manager, Lynn Jacobs – Transportation Engineer The meeting was called to order at: 3:15 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1 Work Session Items 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 3:00 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Rachel Otto provided information regarding: COVID-19 Updates •Cases in the US were down 15% and up 7% in Utah over the last two weeks •Vaccination/booster information Rachel Otto indicated COVID-19 updates would no longer be provided after today. Tim Cosgrove provided information regarding: Community Engagement Update •Ways to engage with the City at www.slc.gov/feedback/ •Planning events/projects: Non-complying sign amendments (engagement), Landscape chapter update (engagement) •Transportation events/projects: West Temple Reconstruction •Information regarding the Mayor’s Office Community Office Hours Council Member Valdemoros expressed her appreciation for Allison Dupler, Homeless Strategies Outreach Supervisor, for her work with the recent Resource Fairs at Pioneer Park and Library Square and noted the events were well attended and organized. Rachel Otto and Andrew Johnston provided information regarding: Homelessness Update •Homeless Resource Center/overflow providers were increasing capacity and daytime options during the All-Star Weekend •Rapid Intervention Team (RIT) location information •Encampment Impact Mitigation (EIM) planned for 990 South 500 West •Resource Fair held at Library Square on Friday, February 10, 2023, included 16 providers, next Resource Fair planned for Friday, March 10, 2023 •Information regarding the “Miami Model: Sequential Intercept” – identifying the ways different agencies intersect with persons experiencing homelessness and their entry/diversion from the justice system in conjunction with County/State providers MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 2 2.Ordinance: Amending the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board ~ 3:15 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend the membership of the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry (PNUT) Advisory Board. The ordinance would codify the inclusion of two representatives of Indigenous Tribes or organizations of Utah on the PNUT board, as at-large members. This includes members of, or descendants of, the following tribes: Ute (all bands), Paiute, Goshute, Dine’/Navajo, Shoshoni, Arapaho, Oglala Sioux, Cheyenne River Sioux, Wind River Shoshone, Cherokee, or Rosebud Sioux. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Ashley Cleveland and Kristen Riker provided information regarding: •Current membership term: 10 members and three at-large members (currently with one at-large vacancy), representing each council district (and must reside in that council district) with remaining members of the board being appointed as at- large members •Proposed membership term: at least two at-large members represent indigenous tribes/organizations, and no more than three at-large members may live outside of Salt Lake City boundaries 3.Informational: Salt Lake County Animal Services for Salt Lake City ~ 3:30 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the Salt Lake County Animal Services for the City. The contract with Animal Services provides administration, personnel, equipment, and supplies necessary to support a modern, well-equipped animal control department in compliance with applicable laws and standards including, but not limited to; licensing, regulation, controlling and shelter services, and special programs. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 3 Sylvia Richards provided an introduction to the briefing. Talia Butler (Salt Lake County Animal Services Division Director) and Carrie Sibert (Salt Lake County Animal Services Liaison & Contract Coordinator) provided information regarding: Salt Lake County Animal Services 2022 Annual Report •2013 was first year as a no-kill shelter and met the target ever since – planned events to celebrate the achievement •List of services provided by Salt Lake County Animal Services •Outcomes and indicators; no-kill shelter, public awareness, high quality service and economies of scale, and safe employees •2022 Interesting facts and highlights •2022 Accomplishments including 14 time winning best in State •2022 Summary of Asilomar Stats from January to December 2022 (shelter counts, intake totals, adoptions, etc.) •Live release rate of 93% (animals leaving the shelter in a positive outcome) •Intake by species and type •Field statistics (call types) •Calls by priority (high vs. low risk) •Citations/notice of violations and most common violations (no license, no rabies, running at large) •2022 Statistics for Urban Wildlife Program •Highlight outstanding staff •Details regarding the Animal Care Campus goals – new regional adoption and education center •Mobile spay and neuter clinic information •Pet food pantry details •Free microchipping details •Licensing details – residents are required by law to license all owned dogs and in some jurisdictions cats and other pets per ordinance •Upcoming free workshops held on February 23, 2023, and March 9, 2023 Council Members Fowler and Wharton requested more information to provide in Council Member newsletters to promote Animal Service’s events and details. Council Member Dugan spoke regarding unleashed dogs/at-large animals in City parks and sought further discussion with Animal Services on ways to better educate the public and also requested more information on the Eastern Fox Squirrel, being a nuisance to some City neighborhoods, on how to better control the invasive species. Council Member Puy suggested providing Council Member contact information in Salt Lake County newsletters and having Animal Services share any instructional videos with the Council to provide to City residents via social media. 4.Ordinance: Amending the Salt Lake City Sister Cities Board ~ 3:50 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would amend chapter 2.82 of th MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 4 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the Salt Lake Sister Cities Board. The purpose of the Sister Cities program is to promote peace and unite local and global communities through friendship, economic opportunities, and cultural and educational exchange. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Lorena Riffo-Jenson and Katie Matheson provided information regarding: • History of the SLC Sister Cities Program: ◦ Running now for 65 years ◦ First established (locally) in 1958 with Matsumoto, Japan, and now expanded to include a total of six cities: Keelung, Taiwan; Chernivsi, Ukraine; Izhevsk, Russia; Trujillo, Peru; Torino, Italy ◦ Division of Economic Development was assigned to manage the program in approximately 2017 • Proposed ordinance updates research findings; the ordinance had not been updated for around 20 years, the program could benefit from enhanced responsiveness to new Sister Cities’ requests but also better maintenance of current relationships, and opportunities to implement diversity, equity and inclusion on the Board, among other items • Background research conducted via conversations with various entities including the cities of Alpine, Colorado and San Antonio, Texas as well as Department of State and Visit Salt Lake, among others • Ordinance changes summarized into three categories: geographic boundaries, Board of Directors and managing new Sister Cities’ requests • Proposed ordinance changes with a review of old ordinance language • Next steps: Board Members to be appointed and trained, City Task Force – Japanese delegation visit (summer 2023) to include Mayor’s Office, Council Staff, Department of Economic Development, and Arts Council – planning to welcome the delegation from Matsumoto, Japan, which included an interest by the delegation to march in the Days of ‘47 Parade Council Member Mano inquired about the Board Member term limits possibly limiting the building of a deeper relationship with a sister city, and asked perhaps if there was a way that Board Members could cycle off the voting Board and return to vote again. Katie Matheson spoke in agreement and stated that diplomatic relationships were built on the relationships of people and noted that the Department felt that the balance of having two consecutive four-year terms and allowing those members to become non-voting members in perpetuity, would not limit the ability to continue important relationships. Council Member Puy inquired about additional budget implications and staffing needs to manage the Board. Lorena Riffo-Jenson said that the Department wanted to ensure, moving forward, that they could convey success to the Council (not overpromise what MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 5 could not be delivered), therefore they would bring forth a budget when prepared with more information. Related Programs and Initiatives 45 min. The Administration will give an overview of the many housing-related programs and initiatives offered by Salt Lake City, including how existing efforts in the Division of Housing Stability and the Department of Community & Neighborhoods (CAN) relate to those in the Redevelopment Agency (RDA), as well as how all of these relate to new and upcoming initiatives identified in the Housing SLC Plan and the recently-announced Perpetual Housing Fund. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Blake Thomas, Danny Walz, and Tammy Hunsaker provided information regarding: Housing Initiatives Overview • General plan – Implementation framework, including: ◦ City-wide vision ◦ City-wide elements ◦ Community Land Use elements ◦ Land Use Policy ◦ Plans – implementation ◦ Programs – implementation • Housing roles and responsibilities, including: ◦ Policy and plans ◦ Regulatory and financial ◦ Direct delivery programs ◦ Property development • Clarification on how Housing SLC (5-year Citywide Housing Plan) and Thriving in Place (Anti-displacement strategies) would work together • Redevelopment Agency (RDA) role/responsibilities • Overview of recent affordable housing initiatives that had recently come before the Council/would be coming to the Council over the next several weeks Council Member Mano, Tammy Hunsaker, Blake Thomas, and Danny Walz discussed the involvement, issues, and reasoning regarding two different departments doing a similar function when it came to City-owned property vs RDA-owned property and the crossover of the two. Council Member Mano said he wanted to ensure that the public (developer community) could see one place to go for requests for proposals (RFPs), one process to go through and that policies that governed disposal of property for both City- and RDA- owned properties were as aligned/overlapping as much as possible. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 6 5. TENTATIVE – Informational: Overview of SLC Housing-TENTATIVE 6.Informational: Update on the New Five-Year Housing Plan, Housing SLC ~ 4:55 p.m. 40 min. The Council will receive an update on the progress of the new five-year housing plan, called Housing SLC. The City’s current housing plan, Growing SLC, expires at the end of the fiscal year, and a new housing plan is needed to meet state code requirements. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Allison Rowland provided an introduction to the update. Ruedigar Matthes provided information regarding: Housing SLC Key Findings • State requirements – Moderate income housing definition and plan requirements • Details regarding plan coordination – Thriving in Place (TIP) and Housing SLC being complementary and interconnected • Engagement summary – February to April 2022 TIP Phase I engagement, July to November 2022 Housing SLC engagement • Engagement highlights – over 6,000 people engaged across TIP & Housing SLC efforts • Key Finding 1 – rental vacancy rates were low, home sale prices were unaffordable – placing a strain on existing rental housing and causing rents to rise dramatically • Key Finding 2 – housing prices suggested a shortage of housing supply overall, but especially housing that was deeply affordable (30% of area median income) • Key Finding 3 – Salt Lake City was the majority renter, and more than half of all renters were cost-burdened, spending more than 30% of their income on housing costs • Key Finding 4 – a survey of City residents concluded affordable housing and behavioral health services were preferred as solutions for homelessness • Key Finding 5 – a mismatch between the types of housing the market was producing and the needs of the community • Key Finding 6 – wages have not kept pace with the cost of living, especially housing-related costs • Proposed next steps Council Member Mano requested the list of 20 strategies from the State and inquired how many the City were to select. Ruedigar Matthes said 12 strategies had already been addressed in a year's time with an end goal of 17-18 (well above the six required to meet priority consideration) and that he would provide the requested list of strategies. Council Member Petro requested small group meetings regarding this topic for MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 7 additional discussion before the briefings/public hearings were scheduled. 7.Informational: Unallocated U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) Program Income Funds ~ 5:35 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a briefing on unallocated U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) program income funds from the Community Development Block Grant or CDBG and Home Investment Partnership programs. The briefing will include eligible uses of the one-time funds, proposed prioritization and next steps. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Ben Luedtke provided details regarding the budgets that were the focus of the Staff Report (highlighted items): Attachment 1 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) eligible use categories for $5.7 M of program income, and Attachment 2 of HOME Investment Partnership Grant eligible use categories for $8.6 M of program income. Tammy Hunsaker and Tony Milner provided information regarding: Housing Stability Dormant Program Income • Timing and allocation considerations • CDBG funding-specific considerations • 2023-2024 CDBG timeliness example • CDBG eligible map • HOME funding-specific considerations • Administration’s funding priorities relating to new affordable housing units Straw Poll: Unanimous support for the proposed target populations of essential workers (to be defined) and extremely low-income residents (30% AMI and below) by providing rental assistance, mortgage assistance, creating new workforce and/or deeply affordable housing units, and funding the small business and industrial facade improvement program. All Council Members present were in favor. 8.Resolutions: Amending Two Utah Performing Arts Center Interlocal Agreements ~ 6:05 p.m. 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a resolution that would approve changes to two interlocal agreements between Salt Lake City, the Redevelopment Agency (RDA), and the Utah Performing Arts Center Agency (UPACA), for operation of the George S. and Dolores Dore Eccles Theater. The changes are related to cost increases and funding ongoing maintenance of the facilities. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 8 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Jennifer Bruno indicated this agenda item was discussed during the Redevelopment Agency meeting held earlier today (the information was the same) and would be before the Council at the next Formal Meeting for a vote. There was no further discussion. 9.Dinner Break ~ 6:20 p.m. 30 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a 10.Ordinance: Local Link Study Update to 2013 Sugar House Circulation Plan ~ 6:50 p.m. 45 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed update to the 2013 Sugar House Circulation Plan for walking, biking, and public transit within and through the business district. The Local Link study has project and program recommendations, and a Transit Alternatives Analysis evaluating various transit options including streetcar extensions connecting the Sugar House Business District to the Brickyard, Millcreek, and Holladay. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/transportationslc FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 14, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 9 Ben Luedtke provided an introduction to the briefing, noted it was the Council’s role to identify the locally preferred routes, whereas the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) was in charge of operating/maintaining transit services, and indicated the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation for the Council to adopt the plan. Lynn Jacobs and Jon Larsen discussed the following items with Council Members: • A Salt Lake County grant was obtained to conduct the analysis • Joint analysis was led by Salt Lake City that included South Salt Lake, Millcreek, and Holladay • Details of the recommendation for a southern alignment for a future transit route to Millcreek • Alternatives to widening roadways to accommodate future demand (1300 East, Highland Drive, etc.) • Lack of justification for a streetcar but improving bus routes instead • Reasoning for the prolonged time frame of 10-20 years for completion • Details regarding bus stop elements and issues of some bus stops lacking enhancements (ADA access/covered shelters/etc.), on the west and east sides of the City • Reasoning for the study being focused on the Millcreek, Hollday, and Sugar House areas Standing Items 11.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Item not held. 12.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to; • Northpoint Small Area Plan Early Advertising; and • Scheduling Items. Jennifer Bruno indicated the Council’s approval was needed to start early advertising for the Northpointe Small Area Plan, in order to complete action on that plan in March 2023. All Council Members were in favor. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 10 13.Tentative Closed Session - - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Item not held. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 11 Meeting adjourned at: 6:50 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ City Recorder – Cindy Trishman Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, February 14, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 14, 2023 12 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, February 7, 2023. The following Council Members were present: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Present Legislative Leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Isaac Canedo – Public Engagement Communication Specialist, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer – Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst The meeting was called to order at 7:15 pm Council Member Dugan presided. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of May 11, 2021; May 18, 2021; May 25, 2021; September 13, 2022; September 20, 2022; October 18, 2022; November 22, 2022; December 6, 2022; and December 13, 2022, as well as the formal meeting minutes of September 20, 2022. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the work session meeting minutes of May 11, 2021; May 18, 2021; May 25, 2021; September 13, 2022; September 20, 2022; October 18, 2022; November 22, 2022; December 6, 2022, as well as the formal meeting minutes of September 20, 2022. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing February as Black History Month in Salt Lake City. Council Member Fowler read the resolution. The resolution was presented to Maligha Garfield, Director of the Black Cultural Center at the University of Utah. Maligha Garfield thanked the Council for the resolution and for recognizing black history for the past, present, and future. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to adopt a Joint Ceremonial Resolution 2 of 2023, with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing February as Black History Month in Salt Lake City. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1-B7 will be heard as one public hearing 1.Grant Application: 2023 North Temple Economic Revitalization Action Plan Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from Economic Development to the Wasatch Front Regional Council. If awarded, the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 2 grant would fund a consultant hired by Wasatch Front Regional Council to conduct an economic needs/revitalization assessment and provide a strategy that addresses the needs of the business environment and surrounding neighborhoods. The plan would address needs and gaps with incentives to create mixed-use developments which provide access to fresh food, healthcare, and affordable housing. The study area includes North Temple Street between I-15 and I-215. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2.Grant Application: 900 West Reconstruction - Surface Transportation Program 2024-29 The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Engineering to the Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded, the grant would fund the 900 West Reconstruction (North Temple to 600 North). The reconstruction will improve deteriorated pavement, vehicle mobility to Interstate-15, pedestrian and bicycle safety, connection to TRAX and frequent bus service, and access to jobs and education opportunities in the downtown area, North Temple Urban Center, Salt Lake City International Airport, and the University of Utah. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 3.Grant Application: East Downtown Mobility Hub with Electric Bus MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 3 Charging The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded, the grant would fund the East Downtown Mobility Hub with Electric Bus Charging. The project aims to design and construct a mobility hub for bus rapid transit and core routes serving Frontrunner, University of Utah, and Salt Lake and Davis counties and provide operator and end-of-line facilities electric bus charging, and passenger amenities at a key transfer point in Downtown Salt Lake City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 4.Grant Application: Salt Lake City Intersections to Roundabout Pilot Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded, the grant would fund the City’s Intersections to Roundabouts Pilot Program. The project aims to reduce traffic delays, reduce mobile source emissions, increase fuel efficiency, and reduce air pollution by converting the intersection at 500 East 700 South from a conventional traffic signal to a roundabout. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 4 Grant Application: Salt Lake City Bike Share Expansion The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded, the grant would fund the Salt Lake City Bike Share Expansion. The project aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by increasing the concentration of bike share stations west of Interstate 15 and expanding a bike share system that links commuters to regional transit and local destinations. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 6.Grant Application: Salt Lake City Electric Vehicle Car Sharing Pilot program - Carbon Reduction Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Sustainability to the Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded, the grant would fund the Electric Vehicle Car Sharing Pilot Program. The program aims to reduce on-road carbon dioxide emissions by providing residents of an affordable housing property access to short-term electric vehicle (EV) rentals for trips difficult to complete using transit, biking, walking. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 5 5. The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Transportation to the Wasatch Front Regional Council administering U.S. Department of Transportation funds. If awarded, the grant would fund technical assistance for the California Avenue Corridor Study. The study will result in conceptual design, preliminary cost estimates, and policy recommendations, such as access management and land use, to guide future improvements to California Avenue. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Sylvia Richards provided an introduction to the seven grant applications. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-7 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 8.Land Exchange to Facilitate the Bridge to Backman Project The Council will accept public comment about a transfer of certain Open Space Lands owned by Salt Lake City located at 592 N. Riverside Drive for $0 to Riverwood Cove, LLC in exchange for another open space parcel of equal size. This exchange will facilitate the development of a new public park, a community outdoor classroom, and a new walking and bicycling connection to/from Backman Elementary School for Backman Elementary School students, and will resolve a current encroachment issue. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 and Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 6 7.Grant Application: California Avenue Corridor Study TENTATIVE Council Action - tbd Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ben Luedtke provided a brief introduction to the land exchange proposal. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to continue the public hearing to a future date. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 9.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 704 East 900 South The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map for the property at approximately 704 East 900 South from R-2 (Single- and Two-Family Residential) to SNB (Small Neighborhood Business). The subject property is 0.24 acres. Although a specific development is not being proposed at this time, the rezone is in anticipation of bringing illegally added dwelling units up to code. Petitioner: Ale Gicqueau, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00251. The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation, therefore an ordinance has not been drafted. If the Council decides to approve the zone amendment, an ordinance would be drafted and considered for approval. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposal. Lance Spencer, representing the Salt Lake Chapter of the Center for New Liberalism, thanked the Council for being willing to consider flexible solutions to the zoning issue, said the City needed to expand flexibility for increased housing and mixed-use throughout the City, and urged the Council to push for the maximum use of the property MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 7 (increased density of housing or a business that provided jobs/revenue). Jen Colby, District 4 Resident, spoke in opposition to the proposal and asked the Council to deny the request to rezone the property. Cindy Cromer noted the existing issues with the property and said the rezone to a commercial zone would drive the demolition of the house at a future time and urged the Council to protect the structure. Kristina Robb, Chair of East Liberty Park Community Organization, read a letter detailing the organization’s support for the rezone request including a list of recommended considerations. Deborah Candler spoke in opposition to the proposal and expressed concern regarding the potential unintended consequences that could occur and the lack of parking in the area that would be exacerbated, and asked the Council to deny the request. Nathan Florence expressed concerns regarding real estate investors buying up property in this neighborhood and petitioning for zoning changes above what was normally allowed in the area – zoning should remain consistent in the neighborhood. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Valdemoros to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 10.Ordinance: Rocky Mountain Power Rezone The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of the property at 1223 West North Temple and portions of properties located at 1219 West, 1275 West, and 1407 West North Temple Street from M-1 Light Manufacturing and TSA-SP-C Transit Station Area-Special Purpose-Core to TSA-Urban Center-Core. The purpose of the amendment is to accommodate new office headquarters for Rocky Mountain Power. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petitioner: Rocky Mountain Power, Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00450. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 8 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposal. Cindy Cromer said the property owner had a vision similar to her own and thanked Rocky Mountain Power for hiring local consultants and design team partners. Soren Simonsen, Executive Director of the Jordan River Commission, spoke in favor of the proposal, expressed excitement to see the Jordan River as a centerpiece of the project, and encouraged the Council to move forward with the proposal. Nigel Swaby, Fairpark Community Council Chair, spoke in support of the proposal and raised issues the community was concerned about: a master plan was needed for the area, a bridge connecting North Temple and 200 South was needed and grocery and retail were a need in the area. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 11.Ordinance: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations. The proposed code revisions would eliminate the conditional use requirement for detached ADUs in single-family residential zones. They would also aim to lower zoning barriers to construction of ADUs in general. The proposed changes would seek to strike a better balance between encouraging construction of ADUs and mitigating impacts to neighboring properties. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-000475 For more information on this item visit www.tinyurl.com/ADUTextAmendment FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 and Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 17, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 9 Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposed ordinance. Lance Spencer, Kesenyia Kniazeva, Adam Cook, R. Scott Messersmith, Kobe Elias, Eric Valchuis, Nigel Swaby, Turner Bitton, Wendy Garvin spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance. Comments included: the Council should enact the least amount of restrictions possible to maximize value of the City’s limited land, ADU’s created stability for the unsheltered, ADU’s eliminated the need for persons to live in their cars or live far from where they were employed, eliminating the conditional use and parking requirements would encourage more ADUs, owner occupancy requirements were an impediment to ADUs, higher density in the City would promote fewer car trips/less congestion on freeways, reducing fees would incentivize more ADUs, consistency in preventing ADUs from becoming short-term rentals was needed, encouraged City programs to help fund/finance ADUs. Josie Fife inquired when/if the Council would ease size restrictions for ADUs as she wanted to build a larger sized ADU for her property (larger than 550 square feet). Cindy Cromer brought the following issues to the Council’s attention: addressing the loss of solar access for all housing (would ADU’s block neighboring solar panels/gardens/views), trees being removed for construction of ADUs, eliminating the conditional use process might lead to short-term rentals, etc. Kristina Robb spoke on items important to the East Liberty Park Community Organization (ELPCO) including concerns about illegal units already in place, safety of all rentable units in the ELPCO area limits, and asked the Council to ensure renters have a fair deal addressing safety issues in all rentals. Soren Simonsen spoke in favor of the proposed amendment and suggested the Council consider the following: keeping the owner/occupancy requirement would prevent absentee landlord issues, compatibility of approved ADUs with the original structure, and adding the consideration of micro-units. Nat Bottomley spoke in favor of the owner/occupant requirement for control standards and suggested second-story garages be converted to ADUs. Tom Lund, Yalecrest Neighborhood Association Board Member, expressed concerns with no provisions for homeowners regarding standards to ensure the value of the homes next to ADUs did not go down and noted impacts such as lack of parking in some neighborhoods and ADUs being too close to neighboring properties. James Webster spoke in opposition to ADUs in the Yalecrest neighborhood and said a recently built ADU next to his property led to contamination in his yard (lead paint from the garage that was demolished) and expressed concerns on no provision to notify him that it was being built and noted problems such as loss of privacy, quality of life, and impacting property values. Chris Magerl spoke regarding the need to retain the owner/occupancy requirement and ADU’s larger than standard-sized homes were out of character for some MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 10 neighborhoods. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Fowler to close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 12.POSTPONED – Ordinance: Electric Vehicle Readiness Off-Street Parking Stalls Amendment The public hearing will be postponed to a future agenda. The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend and update City code requirements for parking on some new construction projects. New multi-family housing projects like condos and apartments would be required to add electrical capacity on twenty percent of their off-street parking stalls. The electrical capacity would allow the future addition of electric vehicle charging stations at the stalls constructed for them. The proposal would amend the City’s land use code at 21A.44.040. The requirement would also apply to major reconstructions of qualifying properties in multi-family zones. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 3, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 3, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE. D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 11 2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited to two minutes.) Dr. Maria Goller spoke regarding concerns about the Foothills Trail Plan due to impacts on the fragile ecosystem and encouraged/recommended the Council to ensure the environmental consultants complete their analysis, support the use of ecological data (including human-usage data) to develop the trail plans and maintain oversight to ensure trail development was done properly. Christopher Butler spoke regarding reports that the City spent money from the State to assist with homelessness to fund police officers, questioned how this helped the issue of homelessness, and suggested that funding go towards homelessness. Kesenyia Kniazeva said drastic measures were needed to end the homeless epidemic, and encouraged the Council to push for a City sanctioned campground to help the unsheltered find stability, store their belongings and emerge from poverty. Kristina Robb spoke regarding The West Youth Resilient and Advocacy Project she was involved with that advocated for youth to advocate for themselves, their needs, and safety, and asked the Council to continue considering safety and enforcement in City neighborhoods. Soren Simonsen spoke regarding the updated Blueprint Jordan River publication (replacing the original publication from 2008) containing information that guided the creation of the Jordan River Commission and work along the Jordan River corridor and provided copies for the Council/Mayor offices and thanked the Council for their recent efforts (the Carriage House at Fisher Mansion, Backman Elementary Bridge, etc.) Billy Palmer, representing The Westside Coalition, spoke in favor of the Rocky Mountain Power rezone proposal, noting the unique opportunity for mixed-income and much-needed economic development along the North Temple corridor and urged the Council to advocate for development that would fit a master plan that would revitalize the business nodes that were in decline on the west side of the City. Wendy Garvin spoke regarding funding intended for homelessness being used for police officers and suggested the Council instead spend the money on housing unsheltered neighbors/support the unsheltered population. E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 12 F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. G.CONSENT: 1.Resolution: $3.5 Million One-time HOME-ARPA Grant Funding The Council will set the date of Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants. As part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), the City received $3.5 million from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department or HUD. The one-time grant funding for the HOME program is designated for housing opportunities to help individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness and domestic violence survivors. There are several steps required by HUD for the City to accept and be able to use the funding including a community assessment, allocation plan, and amending the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2.Ordinance: Right of Way Permit Notification Fee The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend notice requirements for work in the public way permits and impose a fee related to such notices. If adopted, the fee associated with the pre-notification postcards would be in the existing Consolidated Fee Schedule so that the appropriate fees can be assessed to the public way permit applicant along with the other required public way permit fees prior to approval and issuance of the permit. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 13 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 21, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3.Ordinance: Rezone at approximately 130 North 2100 West The Council will set the date of Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map pertaining to a parcel at approximately 130 North 2100 West to remove the AFPP (Airport Flight Path Protection) Overlay District Influence Zone B. The property is currently occupied by a hotel building and associated parking. The desired result is to allow the building to operate as permanent supportive housing primarily for those ages 62 and older. Petitioner: Friends of Switchpoint Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00833 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 4.Ordinance: Local Link Study Update to 2013 Sugar House Circulation Plan The Council will set the date of Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would adopt the Local Link Study as an official update to the 2013 Sugar House Circulation Plan. The Local Link study has project and program recommendations, and a Transit Alternatives Analysis evaluating various transit options including streetcar extensions connecting the Sugar House Business District to the Brickyard, Millcreek, and Holladay. For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/transportationslc FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 14 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 7, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 5.Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Julie Bjornstad The Council will consider approving the appointment of Julie Bjornstad to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 29, 2025. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Staff Recommendation - Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Fowler, seconded by Council Member Mano to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Ana Valdemoros, Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Amy Fowler, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 15 Meeting adjourned at: 8:44 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at www.data.slc.gov by selecting Public Body Minutes) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, February 7, 2023 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 7, 2023 16 YOUTH STATE OF THE CITY REPORT YOUTHCITY GOVERNMENT’S REPORT TO MAYOR MENDENHALL, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS, AND THE SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY “Amplifying Our Voices” APRIL 18, 2023 Introduction Hi, my name is Diya Oommen, and I am a junior at West High School and live in Salt Lake City Council District 2. It’s a pleasure to be with you today. I’d like to thank my fellow YouthCity Government (YCG) members, Representative Angela Romero, and the woman who has the hard task of wrangling us all: Juanita Escareno. This is my third year with YCG, and one of the most important things that I’ve learned with this program is just how resilient we can be. As members of YCG, we talk about how global, federal and state policy issues impact us and our community at a local level. As youth in this City, we’ve seen the world shift, crumble, and grow right beneath our feet. It’s an overwhelming feeling to watch those voted into power ignorantly take rights away from your very own peers. But through it all, we learned that despite what people may tell us, we still have power. We can host youth summits on issues that we see our education system failing with, we can help organize protests against bills such as SB 16, Transgender Medical Treatments and Procedures Amendments, and walk the steps of the Capitol to bring focus back to the issues that mean the most to us. Today’s youth have a specific voice that cannot be stifled. It’s a power to read right from wrong, to view the world as if it’s black and white, without the myriad of biases that affect the decisions made in the political sphere today. We see issues through a lens of different priorities. We’re not fond of the rules set in place by the past, and we see no issue with taking a stand against “the way things have been done”. And the more we know that our voice is being heard, the more we know that we will use it. We appreciate the City giving us a space to be heard and seen. Women’s Rights As-Salaam-Alaikum, my name is Hamda Ibrahim, and I am a senior at West High School and live in Salt Lake City Council District 1. I am originally from Somalia and moved here when I was 10 years old. Growing up in a refugee camp in Somalia, it was very hard for me to form an identity due to all the violence and constant human rights violations that surrounded me from a young age. When I came to America all I wanted was separation. Separation from all the trauma I endured, and from the loudness of living in an active war zone. But as I grew older, I realized separation wasn’t what I needed, but relief. Separation implied forgetting my culture and people and turning a blind eye to the wrongdoings of the few in power. Choosing relief has given me my never- ending passion for women’s rights. I am an advocate for awareness and action for female- genital-mutilation (FGM) and preventing child marriages in third world countries. I talked about the topic of FGM when I served on the consent panel for YCG’s For Teens by Teens Youth Summit with Utah Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Planned Parenthood. It felt empowering to share my story and the stories of the many Somali women and girls that die from female genital mutilation yearly. On the panel we also covered boundaries, what consent looks like in different forms; body language, verbal communication and tone, and what NO means, and how consent can be given or taken. I personally loved the YCG experience because no matter what issues you’re passionate about and what’s in your heart Juanita and Representative Romero will find a way to give your voice a platform to be heard in the City. The diversity of youth in the YCG program is something to be celebrated and I hope to be continued. Reproductive Rights Hello, my name is Julia. I am a senior at Rowland Hall and live in Salt Lake Council District 3, and I care deeply about reproductive rights. As someone affected by access to abortions and birth control, the country's broad crackdown on reproductive rights concerns me. And when I look into my community, I feel more profound concern. Governor Spencer Cox signed legislation in March that will make abortion inaccessible. As a student and as a menstruator, it concerns me that we don’t view abortion as lifesaving, yet we allow students to walk the halls of their schools in fear of their life being taken away from them as a result of lax and unreasonably unregulated gun laws. When I walked the streets of downtown Salt Lake City in late June, I was flooded with emotions of betrayal. I felt unwelcome in a community that would endanger women and force individuals to receive dangerous, off-market operations or be forced to give birth to a child they may not have the resources to care for. The overturn of Roe v Wade caused panic for many women living in our city and state. My worst concern about how Utah would respond to the decision became my reality. Despite this cruel human rights violation, I found some peace in the YCG. A program that aims to empower youth, YCG also became a safe haven for discussing concerns that seemed to be ignored at higher levels. YCG was a place for reflection, empowerment, community connection, and participation. Going to YCG months after Roe v Wade was overturned, up to now, approaching the one-year mark, I am just as concerned. I still worry that my community is reversing the progress that took decades to accomplish. I still wonder why women's safety is being sacrificed. But one thing that the YCG has changed about this horrific situation is the extent to which I feel change is possible. Trans Youth Rights Hello, my name is Rodrigo Fernandez-Esquivias, I’m a Senior at Rowland Hall and a member of YCG. This session Utah’s legislative majority blatantly passed transphobic legislation, SB 16, which bans minors from accessing lifesaving gender affirming care, including hormone therapy and gender affirming surgeries is one of the most abhorrent pieces of legislation we have seen in recent years. The passage and signing of this bill has had a chilling effect on our schools, community and city. I want to make one thing very clear: the American Medical Association, the American Association of Pediatrics, the Endocrine Society, the American Association of Psychiatrists all recommend these procedures for minors experiencing gender dysphoria. To quote Jon Stewart, “When your child has pediatric cancer, your doctor references the guidelines set by the American Association of Pediatrics.” Which medical organizations agree with these lawmakers? I was present during the house committee hearing on SB16, and the claims the witnesses were making did not comport with any of the recent medical data. Our lawmakers appear to be cherry picking which medical guidelines to support. These lawmakers claim they are protecting kids, but how exactly are they protecting them? We don't wait to medicate kids with depression and ADHD until they are 18. Why? The medications prescribed for depression have side effects, the same as hormones prescribed to trans kids, of course, most medications have side effects. Depression and ADHD are in the same category in the DSM -5 as gender dysphoria, so why do we treat them differently? How is postponing peer reviewed medical treatment protecting kids? Study after study has shown that discriminatory legislation, such as S B 16, has been shown to increase feelings of marginalization and takes a toll on mental health. We have one of the highest teen suicide rates in the country. So why are we banning treatments that are proven to have positive mental health outcomes and presenting it as a legitimate solution to solving our teen mental health crisis? If there was a pill that had the same mental health outcomes as gender affirming care, every single doctor and lawmaker in the country would be recommending it. So, what are we doing? What are we doing? The state has no right to interject itself into someone's body or to interfere in medical practices. I hope in future we can come together as a city and state to challenge legislation that erases members in our community. It starts with us. It starts now. At our recent For Teens by Teens Youth Summit, we partnered with the ACLU of Utah and discussed trans rights and how it impacts youth. The panel discussion detailed current anti-trans bills, how to engage in youth activism, and how to make the world a safer space for trans and LGBTQ+ people. I’m thankful to be a part of YCG because the program supports basic human rights for ALL in our City. Conclusion Good evening, Council Members, my name is Cate Love and I am a senior at East High School and live in Council District 6. I have had the opportunity to be in the YCG for the past 3 years. Last summer, I also had the opportunity to intern for all of you in the Salt Lake City Council Office. In YCG, I have seen firsthand the power and potential of young people to positively impact our city. By providing opportunities for youth to participate in the decision-making process, we can harness their creativity, passion, and fresh perspectives to address the challenges and opportunities facing Salt Lake City. I urge the City Council to continue to actively seek out and value the input of young people, whether it be through youth councils like ours, internships, community and city council meetings, or other channels of engagement. Let us create an inclusive and participatory environment where young people feel heard, respected, and encouraged to contribute their ideas and opinions. By doing so, we will not only cultivate a stronger sense of civic pride and ownership among our youth, but also ensure a more vibrant, resilient, and forward-thinking City for years to come. Lastly, I would like to thank Representative Romero and Juanita for all the hard work and time they put in for us each week. They do so much to ensure we get the most out of the YouthCity Government. On a personal note, I would like to thank you and the City Council staff for the opportunity and kindness I was met with as your intern. Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards , Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Elizabeth Gerhart, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com Department of Police – Grant Acquisition and Management | Jordan Smith CC: FROM: Sarah Behrens DATE: January 13, 2023 SUBJECT: 2022 Fix The Bricks FUNDING AGENCIES: Department of Homeland Security|FEMA GRANT PROGRAM: Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $3,344,560.49 DEPARTMENT: Community and Neighborhoods|Housing Stability COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: January 3, 2023 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Grant requests funds for two FTE for program administration (Please see detail below) Match Required 30% $1,433,635.21 In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: The State of Utah Department of Emergency Management has included Salt Lake City’s Fix the Bricks subapplication as a part of its 2022 BRIC application. The 2022 Fix the Bricks subapplication requests continued funding for seismic improvements on private single-family dwellings. The 2022 application includes duplexes and recruitment of homeowners who qualify as having low to moderate income. The estimated budget reflects a three-year grant performance period. Federal Request Budget Personnel $ 403,101 Fringe Benefits $ 215,918 Engineering Assessment $ 126,714 Seismic Improvements $2,584 ,827.49 Community Engagement $ 14,000 The match of 30% is met through the cost to the homeowners after receiving grant funds, $1,107,793.21 Housing Stability non federally funded staff positions time, $265,546.00 and existing department budget, $60,306.00 TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST $3,344,560.49 TOTAL SUBAPPLICANT MATCH $1,433,635.21 TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,778,195.70 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards , Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Elizabeth Gerhart, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com EC: Department of Economic Development | SLC Art s Council | Felicia Baca, Taylor Knuth FROM: Sarah Behrens DATE: February 21, 2023 SUBJECT: Wake the Great Salt Lake FUNDING AGENCIES: Bloomberg Philanthropies GRANT PROGRAM: 2022 Public Art Challenge REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $1,000,000 DEPARTMENT: Department of Economic Development | Salt Lake City Arts Council COLLABORATING AGENCIES: University of Utah Utah Division of Arts & Museums Utah Division of Environmental Quality Save our Great Salt Lake Friends of Great Salt Lake Great Salt Lake Collaborative DATE SUBMITTED: February 15,2023 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance Provides 2 Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: The grant request 2 RPT (32 hours/week). 1. Lead Curator and 2. Project Coordinator Match Required 1:1 In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: The goal is to educate and inspire both residents and visitors to identify possible solutions and take action on a local and national level. P ublic art projects will be installed in urban areas and sites related to ecological/architectural significance; public utili ties; industrial sites; and tourism and culture sites - all aimed at dramatically increasing awareness of diverse populations. Projects will be structured around major themes such as water conservation and air quality; agriculture and industry; environmental and social justice - including indigenous rights; and ecology of the lake. The proposed project will consist of , 1) A series of 3 -5 major artworks across the city created by world -renowned artists. These artists will be selected with the intention of leveraging their notoriety and practice while bringing awareness of our civic issue. 2) A series of temporary public art projects by local & regional artists and organizations in a multiplicity of disciplines, including but not limited to performers, sculptors, painters, muralists, printmakers, filmmakers, poets, new media, etc. By commissioning our local community of artists to create context and site -specific artworks about the Great Salt Lake, our local community will be able to reflect on this crisis in new and compelling ways. Bloomberg Philanthropies Request $1,000,000 Salt Lake City Match $1,060,000 Project Total $2,060,000 The match is met though , Salt Lake City Arts Council in-kind staff time $ 3 50,000 Additional grant funding $ 150,000 Private Foundations $ 5 60,000 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Page 1 of 2 Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com EC: Department of Sustainability | Debbie Lyons, Sophia Nicholas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: February 17, 2023 SUBJECT: Consumer Recycling Education and Outreach Grant Program | Reuse, Reduce, and Recycle for a Waste- Free Salt Lake City FUNDING AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency GRANT PROGRAM: Consumer Recycling Education and Outreach Grant Program REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $954,687 DEPARTMENT: Department of Sustainability | Division of Waste and Recycling COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Utah Recycling Alliance DATE SUBMITTED: February 15, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 4 FTE 0.50 Positions □ Existing  New  Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation - NEW: $365,158 in wages and fringe benefits over 2.5 years for four part-time Education Specialists to conduct reuse, reduce, and recycle presentations at community events, schools, and businesses; staff tabling events; monitor curbside recycling and green waste can contamination weekly on Westside routes; assist community recycling collection events; train Recycling Ambassadors; and support campaign outreach. Explanation - OVERTIME: $5,280 in 48 hours of overtime for two Waste Recycling Equipment Operators to load and transport electronic (e-) waste collected at community recycling events to a disposal facility. □ Match Required  In-Kind Services and  Cash GRANT DETAILS:  Division of Waste & Recycling requested $954,687 for Reuse, Reduce, and Recycle for a Waste-Free Salt Lake City.  The project promotes the role of reuse, reduce, and recycle (R3) to achieve zero waste by 2040 by engaging, building trust, and increasing awareness and participation of low-income and disadvantaged members of Salt Lake City in residential and community recycling programs. Page 2 of 2  Anticipated outcomes are: 1) a reduction in language and transport barriers to participation in residential and community recycling programs, 2) a 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream, 3) an estimated 1,547 total tons of additional municipal solid waste collected, recycled, composted, and managed, and 4) identification of effective R3 communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities.  The $954,687 funding request includes: − $370,438 in Personnel (see above for details) − $64,000 in Equipment for two electric vehicles − $369,821 in Contractual for professional services of a communications firm, interpreter service provider, e-waste disposal contractor tipping fees, and household hazardous waste disposal service contractor − $150,428 in Other for: A) stipends for Westside community members to participate in targeted community engagement through: (i) Community Recycling Conversations, as defined in the project workplan, to identify: a) priority R3 messaging and language translation needs for the communication campaign and b) interest in a Recycling Ambassador program, and (ii) Recycling Ambassador training, if determined as a priority by Westside members and B) a subaward to Utah Recycling Alliance to conduct at Westside locations: (i) R3 outreach and education activities, (ii) collections of hard to recycle materials, and (iii) single-site single-item drop off collections. Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com EC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Tammy Hunsaker, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: February 17, 2023 SUBJECT: Marathon Petroleum Foundation | YouthCity Teen Program Transportation Solutions FUNDING AGENCY: Marathon Petroleum Foundation GRANT PROGRAM: Marathon Community Investments Program REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $75,000 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Division of Youth & Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: None DATE SUBMITTED: February 15, 2023 SPECIFICS:  Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance □ Provides Hourly Positions □ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: □ Match Required  In-Kind Services and  Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth & Family Services requested $75,000 to purchase one 14-passenger van for YouthCity Northwest Teen.  The van use is for the transport of YouthCity Northwest Teen participants from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the Northwest Community Center, which is the site for YouthCity Northwest Teen. Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Elizabeth Gerhart, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk Office of the City Attorney | Justin Anderson, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com Department of Police | Mike Brown, Shellie Dietrich FROM: Jordan Smith DATE: January 6, 2023 SUBJECT: Department of Public Safety – First Responder Mental Health Services Application FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Public Safety GRANT PROGRAM: First Responder Mental Health Services REQUESTED AMOUNT: $31,980 DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Police Department COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A DATE SUBMITTED: December 27, 2022 SPECIFICS:  Equipment/Supplies  Technical Assistance (Training)  Provides FTE Position  Existing  New  Overtime  Requires Funding After Grant Explanation:  Match Required:  In-Kind and/or  Cash GRANT DETAILS: The Salt Lake City Police Department is requesting funding to purchase three NeurOptimal® neurofeedback systems for use in its Wellness and Peer Support Program. These systems are being used to improve symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, anxiety, trauma, panic, depression, and more. The request includes: - NeurOptimal® Start-Up Bundle (3 systems) - $29,985 - Annual subscription - $1,995 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Finance | Christopher Jennings FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: February 2, 2023 SUBJECT: Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard | Leading City Procurement Reform FUNDING AGENCY: Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard GRANT PROGRAM: Leading City Procurement Reform REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $0 DEPARTMENT: Department of Finance | Division of Purchasing and Contract Management COLLABORATING AGENCIES: None DATE SUBMITTED: January 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only  Technical Assistance □ Provides Hourly Positions □ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: □ Match Required  In-Kind Services and  Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Purchasing and Contract Management requested technical assistance to elevate resource procurement as a more strategic function central to the contracting regime of the City.  If selected to participate, the Director and Deputy Director of the Division of Purchasing and Contract Management and the Deputy Director of the Department of Finance will take part in virtual and in-person intensive classroom experiences featuring case studies, simulations, and working sessions taught by faculty from the Harvard Kennedy School Government Performance Lab. Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Brent Beck, Tammy Hunsaker, Elizabeth Rich, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: March 22, 2023 SUBJECT: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 | Sorenson Unity Center - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Workforce Services GRANT PROGRAM: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $62,223 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Youth and Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 9 Seasonal Positions  Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: A total of $43,765.11 in the grant funding request is directed to personnel for wages and fringe benefits (FICA/Medicare) for nine seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery. □ Match Required □ In-Kind Services and □ Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth and Family Services requested $62,223 for Sorenson Unity Center summer youth program general operating expenses.  Requested grant funds are allocated to Sorenson Unity Center summer youth program expenses listed below. EXPENSE CATEGORY GRANT REQUEST Personnel (detail provided above) $43,765.11 Materials and Supplies $11,111.39 Educational Field Trips $7,346.50 TOTAL $62,223.00 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Brent Beck, Tammy Hunsaker, Elizabeth Rich, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: March 22, 2023 SUBJECT: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 | Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Workforce Services GRANT PROGRAM: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $62,223 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Youth and Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 9 Seasonal Positions  Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: A total of $43,765.11 in the grant funding request is directed to personnel for wages and fringe benefits (FICA/Medicare) for nine seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery. □ Match Required □ In-Kind Services and □ Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth and Family Services requested $62,223 for Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center summer youth program general operating expenses.  Requested grant funds are allocated to Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center summer youth program expenses listed below. EXPENSE CATEGORY GRANT REQUEST Personnel (detail provided above) $43,765.11 Materials and Supplies $11,111.39 Educational Field Trips $7,346.50 TOTAL $62,223.00 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Brent Beck, Tammy Hunsaker, Elizabeth Rich, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: March 22, 2023 SUBJECT: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 | Ottinger Hall - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Workforce Services GRANT PROGRAM: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $62,223 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Youth and Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 9 Seasonal Positions  Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: A total of $43,765.11 in the grant funding request is directed to personnel for wages and fringe benefits (FICA/Medicare) for nine seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery. □ Match Required □ In-Kind Services and □ Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth and Family Services requested $62,223 for Ottinger Hall summer youth program general operating expenses.  Requested grant funds are allocated to Ottinger Hall summer youth program expenses listed below. EXPENSE CATEGORY GRANT REQUEST Personnel (detail provided above) $43,765.11 Materials and Supplies $11,111.39 Educational Field Trips $7,346.50 TOTAL $62,223.00 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Brent Beck, Tammy Hunsaker, Elizabeth Rich, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: March 22, 2023 SUBJECT: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 | Liberty Park - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Workforce Services GRANT PROGRAM: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $62,223 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Youth and Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 9 Seasonal Positions  Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: A total of $43,765.11 in the grant funding request is directed to personnel for wages and fringe benefits (FICA/Medicare) for nine seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery. □ Match Required □ In-Kind Services and □ Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth and Family Services requested $62,223 for Liberty Park summer youth program general operating expenses.  Requested grant funds are allocated to Liberty Park summer youth program expenses listed below. EXPENSE CATEGORY GRANT REQUEST Personnel (detail provided above) $43,765.11 Materials and Supplies $11,111.39 Educational Field Trips $7,346.50 TOTAL $62,223.00 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Brent Beck, Tammy Hunsaker, Elizabeth Rich, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: March 22, 2023 SUBJECT: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 | Fairmont Park - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Workforce Services GRANT PROGRAM: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $62,223 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Youth and Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 9 Seasonal Positions  Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: A total of $43,765.11 in the grant funding request is directed to personnel for wages and fringe benefits (FICA/Medicare) for nine seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery. □ Match Required □ In-Kind Services and □ Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth and Family Services requested $62,223 for Fairmont Park summer youth program general operating expenses.  Requested grant funds are allocated to Fairmont Park summer youth program expenses listed below. EXPENSE CATEGORY GRANT REQUEST Personnel (detail provided above) $43,765.11 Materials and Supplies $11,111.39 Educational Field Trips $7,346.50 TOTAL $62,223.00 Item E1 – E12 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-12 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/18/23 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested? Grant Title Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant Amount and FTE Amount 1.Yes $1,433,635 will be met from cost to homeowners 2 Existing FTEs (program administration) Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities (BRIC) (formerly Fix the Bricks program) Annual funds provide seismic improvements for single-family homes and duplexes. Recruitment for homeowners who qualify as low to moderate income. Housing Stability made homeowners aware of these funds. 8 households qualified for the match funds for an estimated total of over $47,000, providing seismic upgrades to homeowners that likely would not have otherwise received them. Admin. expects the remainder of these match funds to be used by the end of the fiscal year. Needs a public hearing yes $3,344,560 2 Existing FTEs 2.Yes $1,060,000 Sources: $350,000 SLCity Arts Council in-kind staff time; additional grant funding of $150,000 and $560,000 in private donations. If SLC becomes a finalist, the Arts Council will work 2 New part-time employees, 1 lead curator and 1 project coordinator 2022 Wake the Great Salt Lake Public Art Challenge Commission 3 to 5 major art pieces by world-renowned artists. Funds a series of temporary public art projects by local and regional artists with the intent of educating and increasing awareness of diverse populations. Please let staff know if you would like more information on the artist and artwork selection process. Needs a public hearing No $1 million 2 New Part- time employees Once artwork is installed and work is complete, any remaining towards securing financial partners. work would be done by the Public Art team.) 3.No 4 New part-time employees (education specialists) Consumer Recycling Education & Outreach Grant/ -Reuse, Reduce & Recycle for a Waste-free SLC Wages & benefits for 4 new Education Specialists to conduct recycling presentations for 2.5 years at westside community events, monitor curbside recycling and train recycling ambassadors. Includes overtime funding for 2 recycling equipment operators to move e- waste collected at community events, equipment for 2 e-cars, interpreter services, stipends for westside community members participating in community engagement. Outcomes: 1) Reduction in language and transport barriers to participate in recycling programs, 2) 5% reduction of contamination entering the recycling stream 3) estimated 1,547 total tons of additional solid waste collected, recycled, composted 4) identification of effective communication strategies and messaging for replication with Eastside communities. Needs a public hearing Yes.$954,687 4 New part- time employees 4. No None Marathon Petroleum Foundation – One 14-passenger van for Northwest Recreation Center. Teen YouthCity participants will be Needs a public hearing Possibly $75,000 No new FTEs YouthCity Teen Transportation Solutions transported from neighborhood middle schools and high schools to the community center. 5.No None First Responder Mental Health Services Application – Wellness and Speer Support Program Purchase of 3 neurofeedback systems to improve post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep difficulties, trauma, panic, depression, etc. Includes annual subscription and 3 start-up systems. Needs a public hearing Possibly $31,980 No new FTEs 6.No None Leading City Procurement Reform Training to emphasize procurement as a more central city function. Needs a public hearing Yes Training- only. No new FTEs 7. through 12. No 9 existing seasonal positions at each YouthCity location TIME SENSITIVE School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant Wages and benefits for 9 existing seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery at Sorenson Unity Center, Sorenson Multi- Cultural Center, Liberty Park, Ottinger Hall, Fairmont Park and Central City YouthCity locations. Needs a public hearing by May 31st. Yes $62,223 9 existing seasonal positions at each location Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Ann Garcia, Sandee Moore, John Vuyk; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com CC: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Blake Thomas, Brent Beck, Tammy Hunsaker, Elizabeth Rich, Kim Thomas FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg DATE: March 22, 2023 SUBJECT: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 | Central City - Time Sensitive - FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Workforce Services GRANT PROGRAM: School-Age Summer Quality Expansion Grant 2023 REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $62,223 DEPARTMENT: Department of Community and Neighborhoods | Division of Youth and Family Services COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Not applicable DATE SUBMITTED: February 27, 2023 SPECIFICS: □ Equipment/Supplies Only □ Technical Assistance  Provides 9 Seasonal Positions  Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: A total of $43,765.11 in the grant funding request is directed to personnel for wages and fringe benefits (FICA/Medicare) for nine seasonal positions dedicated to summer program delivery. □ Match Required □ In-Kind Services and □ Cash GRANT DETAILS:  The Division of Youth and Family Services requested $62,223 for Central City summer youth program general operating expenses.  Requested grant funds are allocated to Central City summer youth program expenses listed below. EXPENSE CATEGORY GRANT REQUEST Personnel (detail provided above) $43,765.11 Materials and Supplies $11,111.39 Educational Field Trips $7,346.50 TOTAL $62,223.00 Item E13 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment PLNPCM2022-00529 (The Council may wish to continue the public hearing since there was not an online option to provide comments during the April 18, 2023 meeting) MOTION 1 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment PLNPCM2022-00529 BRIEFING UPDATE Following a presentation from Design Workshop, the Council expressed general support for the proposed changes to building heights and pedestrian engagement. Council Members discussed the proposed minimum ten-foot sidewalk width for new development or redeveloped properties. Comments included a desire for wider sidewalks depending on building height to enhance the pedestrian experience. Consistency in sidewalk width was also discussed. The consultant and Planning staff clarified the proposed ten-foot sidewalk width is a minimum, and additional width could be discussed at the design review stage. The intent was to balance the need for appropriate sidewalk width without creating an overly open feel in some downtown areas with very wide streets. If a public right-of-way is not wide enough to accommodate a ten-foot sidewalk, a portion of it would be required on private property. It was noted that there will be inconsistencies when a property is developed or redeveloped with ten-foot sidewalks, but an adjacent property would not have the same requirement unless or until it is redeveloped. Maximum height differences in the Depot District and Granary were also discussed. There is an opportunity to provide additional housing in the more industrial Granary neighborhood, but capping height lower than in the Depot District would make it more difficult to include affordable housing units. Planning staff stated there is a desire to strike a balance between existing warehouses in the Granary District that will hopefully be preserved through adaptive reuse, and very tall buildings being built on adjacent or nearby properties. Affordable housing in these areas is difficult because of what can be Item Schedule: Briefing: April 4, 2023 Set Date: April 4, 2023 Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 Potential Action: May 2, 2023 Page | 2 developed by right. Some additional height through the design review process is an incentive to include affordable housing. Pedestrian amenities were also discussed, with a desire for ground floor commercial space serving the community rather than a gym, leasing office, etc. for building resident use. There was also a request to include bird-friendly glass in the building. Planning staff noted that can be included in the ordinance. The April 18, 2023 public hearing does not include an option for online comments. The Council may consider continuing the public hearing to a future meeting to provide an additional opportunity for comments. As a reminder, the following straw polls were included below in this report. Staff will reach out to you for your input on these and the policy question about UTA’s request to maximize building height in the G-MU district to accommodate redevelopment plans. 1. Does the Council support Planning staff’s recommendation to remove the step back requirement for buildings in the D-1 (Central Business District) zone? 2. Does the Council support the current requirement of a 15’ step back for buildings in the Sugar House Business District (CSHBD) that are taller than 45’? 3. Does the Council support requiring buildings in the CSHBD that abut single- or two-family zoning districts include a step back at 30’? 4. Does the Council support other changes as recommended by Planning Staff (parking, landscaping requirements, etc.)? The following information was provided for the April 4, 2023 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about proposed amendments to the City’s zoning ordinance pertaining to building heights and pedestrian engagement in the Downtown Plan area. The city worked with a consultant, Design Workshop, on the proposal. Proposed changes would affect the following zoning districts as shown in the image below: •D-1 (Downtown Central Business District) •D-2 (Downtown Support) •D-3 (Downtown Warehouse) •D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District) •G-MU (Gateway Mixed Use) •CG (General Commercial) •FB-UN-1/2 (Form-Based Urban Neighborhood 1 and 2) The Administration’s proposal also recommends changes to the Design Standards found in Chapter 21A.37, and the Design Review process found in Chapter 21A.59 of Salt Lake City Code. The proposal includes three main elements: Pedestrian Orientation, Human Scale Design, and Building Height. These are summarized below. Please see the attached presentation from Planning staff and Design Workshop to view a presentation the Planning Division provided that outlines the key changes. Page | 3 Pedestrian Orientation Under the proposal an area is considered pedestrian oriented if sidewalks and public spaces feel safe, welcoming, and free of barriers to those walking or using a wheelchair. Human Scale Design The proposal calls for development to be scaled toward humans through building form, visual interest, first floor activation, façade transparency, overhead elements, setbacks, and public access points. Building Height Building heights may be adjusted and will be considered as they preserve visual corridors, reflect the character of downtown’s individual districts, and include public benefits for height bonuses. Downtown Plan Boundaries and Zoning Districts Image Courtesy Salt Lake City Planning Division Page | 4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION After the Planning Commission forwarded its recommendation and Planning staff was preparing the ordinance in coordination with the Attorney’s Office, they identified a few changes they would like to ask the Council to consider including the final ordinance: •Design standards for the D-1 (Central Business District) zoning district. The draft ordinance includes an upper floor step back of 10’ for buildings between 78’-104’ and 15’ for buildings taller than 104’. Step backs were introduced to additional districts outside the Sugar House Business District (CSHBD) and Form Based Urban Neighborhood-2 (FB-UN2) to encourage additional light and air in higher density districts. o Planning staff doesn’t believe the D-1 (Central Business District) warrants a step back to this degree and recommends the Council remove this requirement, given the distinct feel of the downtown core. •Clarification in the Sugar House Business District (CSHBD) and Form Based Urban Neighborhood (FB-UN) design standards. The draft ordinance includes a 15’ step back for buildings in the CSHBD districts taller than 60’. o Planning staff recommends eliminating changes from the current step back requirement for buildings taller than 45’. For buildings in the CSHBD that abut single- or two-family districts Planning recommends a step back be incorporated at 30’. •Omission of requirement for buildings in the Form Based Urban Neighborhood (FB-UN) zones taller than 30’ to include a 15’ step back was omitted in an earlier draft ordinance. o Planning Staff corrected that omission in the current draft ordinance. •The recently adopted off-street parking ordinance is also being amended as part of this proposal due to language in the draft ordinance limiting size and location of surface parking in the Downtown (D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-4) and General Commercial (CG) zones. o Planning staff is recommending those changes be included in the draft ordinance. •Changes to the Form Based District and Design Standards chapters in City Code making standards for the FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 consistent with the proposed FB-UN3 form-based zoning district being considered by the Council. o Proposed changes to open space landscaping requirements discussed during the Council briefing for the FB-UN3 zone are included. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POTENTIAL STRAW POLLS 1. Does the Council support Planning staff’s recommendation to remove the step back requirement for buildings in the D-1 (Central Business District) zone? 2. Does the Council support the current requirement of a 15’ step back for buildings in the Sugar House Business District (CSHBD) that are taller than 45’? 3. Does the Council support requiring buildings in the CSHBD that abut single- or two-family zoning districts include a step back at 30’? 4. Does the Council support other changes as recommended by Planning Staff (parking, landscaping requirements, etc.)? Page | 5 POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Additional height beyond what is allowed “by right” may be included through design review and would require a public benefit. The Council may wish to ask the Administration to specify what these benefits are and how they can be quantified and tracked for compliance (affordable housing for example). 2. The Council may wish to discuss minimum building heights and potential impacts they may have on developing some smaller parcels. 3. The draft ordinance includes changes to the Form Based District and Design Standards chapters of City Code that include FB-UN3 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood 3) the Council has been briefed about but has not yet adopted. These changes would make FB-UN3 zoning regulations consistent with proposed changes to the FB-UN1 and 2 zones. These include changes to open space landscaping requirements the Council discussed during the FB-UN3 briefing. The Council may wish to ask the Administration for their recommendation on how to move forward without creating any text inconsistencies. 4. The Council may wish to discuss and consider the request from UTA to amend the proposal to maximize allowable height in the GMU district to accommodate redevelopment plans proximate to a potential future UTA headquarters (see chart at the end of this staff report for a comparison of building heights proposed in different downtown zones). PUBLIC PROCESS Design Workshop, consultants for the proposal, held several stakeholder meetings with community council representatives, members of the development community, business and advocacy representatives, the Downtown Alliance, and the Disability and Accessibility Commission. Feedback from these meetings helped guide the proposal. In addition, a citywide survey gathered more than 450 responses from the broader community. Stakeholder Zoom Meetings were held with the following: •Chambers of Commerce and Development Community - November 30, 2021 •Community Council representatives - December 1, 2021 •Community representatives, including members of the Disability and Accessibility Commission - December 2, 2021 •Downtown Alliance - January 19, 2022 The public survey was published on Planning’s website, listserv, Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. The survey was open for three weeks and closed February 24, 2022. Notice was mailed to property owners within the Downtown Plan area May 13, 2022. The Planning Commission was briefed on the proposal at its June 8, 2022 meeting and held a public hearing August 18, 2022 at which one person spoke expressing support. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation on the amendments to the City Council. The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) sent the attached letter to the Council expressing a desire for additional height in the Gateway Mixed Use (GMU) zone beyond what is in the proposal. UTA is preparing to redevelop property near the North Temple and Salt Lake Central Stations. These plans include relocating UTA’s headquarters and potentially construct as many additional floors to the building as allowed by the City, and what the market will support. UTA asked to further increase allowed height or eliminate the maximum allowed height in the GMU zoning district. Page | 6 Current and Proposed Building Heights Zoning District Current Minimum Height Proposed Minimum Height Existing Maximum Height Proposed Maximum Height D-1 Central Business District 100’100’375’ Corner Lots 100’ mid-block None >200’ subject to conditions and design review D-2 Downtown Support District 65’65’120’120’ with conditions D-3 Downtown Warehouse 75’75’90’180’ with conditions D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District N/A N/A 75’ 120’ - 375’ in permitted locations 75’ 120’ – 375’ in permitted locations1 subject to conditions and design review GMU Gateway District Mixed-use 45’ 25’ along 200 South Corridor 75’75’ flat roofs 90’ non-flat roofs Buildings over 90’ up to 180’ are subject to design review CG General Commercial 60’ 90’ subject to design review 75’ (76’-150’ in Granary District with design review.) (76’-105’ outside Granary District with design review.) FBD Form Based District N/A N/A 30’50’ 1-The area bounded by South Temple, West Temple, 200 South, and 200 West ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 22, 2022 Dan Dugan, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment STAFF CONTACT: Kelsey Lindquist, Planning Manager kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com or 385-226-7227 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Salt Lake City Planning Division was awarded a Transportation Land Use Connection Grant from the Wasatch Regional Council in 2021 to update sections of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to building heights and pedestrian engagement in the Downtown Plan area. The consultant, Design Workshop, worked with stakeholders and the city to develop a proposal that updates portions of the Zoning Ordinance as it pertains to building heights, review processes, and pedestrian spaces downtown. These code amendments aim to accommodate growth and respond to development pressures while developing standards for public spaces that improve the livability of the downtown area. Changes seek to promote future downtown growth that is safe, links land use with transportation to reduce vehicle trips, aligns building height with construction types in the building code, and encourages downtown living. Lisa Shaffer (Dec 22, 2022 12:08 MST)12/22/2022 12/22/2022 The city’s adopted plans and policies provide a basis for this proposal. The plans include both the citywide plan, Plan Salt Lake (2015) and the Downtown Plan (2016). These plans were adopted by the City Council after extensive engagement and review by the public and city boards and commissions. The proposal is consistent with a number of principals, objectives, and policies in both plans. Downtown Plan Boundaries and Zoning Districts The above map illustrates the number of zoning districts within the Downtown Plan Area, as well as the number of distinct neighborhoods. The following zoning districts impacted by this proposal, include: D-1 (Downtown Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Business District), G-MU (Gateway Mixed-Use), CG (General Commercial) and the FB-UN1 and 2. Additionally, the Design Standards (21A.37) and the Design Review process (21A.59) are being amended as part of this project. Summary of Proposed Amendments: Downtown Districts (D-1, D-2, D-3 & D-4) The draft introduced consistent language for all four downtown districts, and includes the following proposals within the downtown area: • Eliminating the need for design review for all conditional uses allowed in the downtown districts. • Limiting the location and size of surface parking lots to two double loaded parking aisles no more than 10 parking spaces wide. The surface parking lot location is limited to behind the building. • Prohibiting parking lots, structures, or garages as a principal use, when they result in the demolition of a building. • Standards for midblock walkways, which include a minimum 15’ wide walkway with 6’ unobstructed pedestrian path. These standards include the introduction of allowed encroachments into the midblock walkway. • Sidewalk standards of a minimum of 10’. D-1 (Central Business District) Amendments • Introduction of a maximum of 8’ front or corner side yard. If a yard is provided, the yard must include one of the following pedestrian elements: o Seating at a ratio of one bench for every 500 square feet o Increase of 25% in the total number of trees required o Awning or similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5’ in width and length from all street facing building entrances • Eliminated the distinction between block corners and midblock lots. • Changing the height threshold for design review to 200’ on all properties in the zone compared to the current standard of 100’ for midblock properties and 375’ for corner properties. • Built in exceptions to the minimum height requirement of 100’. These exceptions include: o Utility buildings o Accessory building and structures that serve public transportation, downtown improvement districts or public maintenance o Buildings on lots less than 5,000 square feet • Glass buildings in excess of 100’ must have a stepback between the first floor and 150’. • Buildings in excess of 200’ are allowed through the Design Review process and require compliance with one of the identified options: o Inclusion of a midblock walkway o Inclusion of the affordable housing incentives o Exceeding the requirements for ground floor use and visual interest o Providing a restrictive covenant for a building older than 50 years and not currently listed as a local landmark site o Providing a minimum of 500 square feet of open space that is privately owned but publicly accessible • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement for existing design standards. The amendments include the following: o Upper floor reflective glass limitation o Upper floor stepback o Dimensions between building entrances o Maximum blank wall limitation o Tree canopy coverage percentage requirements o Minimum vegetation standards o Street trees o Soil volume o Curb cut reduction o Overhead cover o Streetscape landscaping o Horizontal articulation D-2 (Downtown Support) Amendments • Requiring a minimum setback of 8’ and maximum of 16’ for residential developments. If the maximum setback is provided, the development must include one of the pedestrian features listed (see the list under the first bullet for D-1). • Required interior side and rear yard setbacks when adjacent to a zone with a height limit of 35’ or less. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement for existing design standards. See list in D-1. D-3 (Downtown Warehouse) Amendments • Requiring a minimum setback of 8’ and maximum of 16’ for residential developments. If the maximum setback is provided, the development must include one of the pedestrian features listed (see the list under the first bullet for D-1). • Building height of 75’ by right. • Buildings taller than 75’ to a maximum height of 180’ are allowed through the Design Review process with one of the following options: o Inclusion of a midblock walkway o Inclusion of the affordable housing incentives o Exceeding the requirements for ground floor use and visual interest o Providing a restrictive covenant for a building older than 50 years and not currently listed as a local landmark site o Providing 500 square feet of open space that is privately owned but publicly accessible • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement for existing design standards. See list in D-1. • Removed the limitation on non-residential uses above the second floor. D-4 (Downtown Secondary Central Business District) Amendments • Introduction of a maximum front yard of 8’. If the maximum front yard is provided, one of the listed pedestrian amenities would be required. • Interior side and rear yard of 10’ required when abutting a district with a maximum height of 35’ or lower. • Additional height beyond 120’ requires one of the identified options listed above. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting existing design standards. See list in D-1. GMU (Gateway Mixed-Use) Amendments • This draft proposes to delete the existing GMU language and replace it with the language provided. The draft eliminates the required Planned Development Application for all new development in the GMU. It also relocates the design standards for the GMU to Chapter 37, so that it is consistent with the rest of the zoning ordinance. • Similarly, to the Downtown Districts, the draft language for the GMU includes midblock walkway standards and allowed encroachments. • Introduction of a maximum front yard setback of 10’ for 30% of the building façade. If the maximum yard is provided, one of the pedestrian amenities would be required. • Increased the height minimum to 75’. Any building over 90’ up to 180’ is allowed through the Design Review process. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting existing required design standards. The amendments include the following: o Upper floor reflective glass limitation o Dimensions between building entrances o Maximum blank wall limitation o Tree canopy coverage percentage requirements o Minimum vegetation standards o Street trees o Soil volume o Curb cut reduction o Overhead cover o Streetscape landscaping o Horizontal articulation CG (General Commercial) Amendments • Decrease of the required 10’ front yard to 5’. • Introduction of a maximum front yard of 10’. If the maximum front yard is provided, one of the pedestrian amenities would be required. See the list under the D-1 heading. • Increase of the permitted height to 75’ from 60’. Specific boundary for height between 75’ and 150’ through the Design Review process. The boundaries for this height are for properties between 400 S to 700 S from 300 W to I-15. Outside of the boundaries, 105’ is the maximum height allowed through Design Review. • Introduction of outdoor usable space, which provides flexibility for locating the additional required landscaping in the midblock walkway, on the rooftop, plaza or within the required provided yard. • Introducing midblock walkway standards. The dimensional requirements and allowed encroachments are the same as the proposed language for the Downtown districts. • Restricting the location and size of surface parking lots. • Introducing the following design standards to CG within the specified boundary: o Ground floor use o Ground floor use and visual interest o Building materials o Ground floor and upper floor glass requirements o Building entrance locations o Blank wall limitations o Street facing façade limitation o Upper floor stepback FB-UN Districts (FB-UN1 & FB-UN2) Amendments • These amendments address many of the community concerns with the form-based districts. • Moving the design standards for FB districts to Chapter 21A.37: Design Standards. • Building form regulations include specific open space requirements. • Introducing tree standards to the required open space in the district. • Allowing height encroachments for rooftop uses, such as a garden or outdoor living space with the following requirements: o The rooftop garden includes vegetation that covers 15% of the space on the roof. o Requires a 6’ tall wall when abutting an FB-UN1, if the rooftop space is used for a commercial space. • Introducing new design standards and adjusting the requirement of existing design standards. The amendments include the following: o Ground floor use o Ground floor use and visual interest o Building materials for both the ground and upper floors o Ground and upper floor glass requirements o Building entrance requirements o Blank wall limitations o Street facing façade length limitations o Upper floor step back required in FBUN2 o Tree canopy coverage percentage requirements o Minimum vegetation standards o Street trees o Soil volume o Curb cut reduction o Overhead cover o Streetscape landscaping o Horizontal articulation o Height transition o Screening of mechanical equipment Design Standards Amendments • Clarifies the authority of the Planning Director when reviewing a modification to a design standard. • New “ground floor use only” definition. •New definition for “amenity space”. •Clarifying durable materials requirements. •Limiting the percentage of reflective glass on new developments. •Clarifying the requirement of an upper floor step back. •Introducing tree canopy coverage requirements. •Introducing height transitions between districts with a taller height allowance and districts with a height maximum of 35’ or less. •Clarifying the horizontal articulation requirements. Design Review Amendments •Clarification on the applicability of the Design Review standards. •Introduces a small threshold for some Design Review proposals to be administratively approved. •Introducing new requirements for building facades that exceed 200’ in length. •Clarification on the roof and cornice design review standard. As anticipated, this project will amend section 21A.44.060 of the recently adopted Off-Street Parking Ordinance. The proposed amendments to this chapter are included in this transmittal. The Planning Commission was briefed on the amendments on June 8, 2022. The Planning Commission provided input and comments to staff. Subsequently, the Planning Commission provided a positive recommendation on the proposed amendments on August 24, 2022. Part of the discussion during the August hearing included comments about the graphics. In response, the consultant adjusted the graphics, which are included in the exhibits of this transmittal. CHANGES TO OFF-STREET PARKING ORDINANCE The recently adopted Off-Street Parking Ordinance will need to be amended as part of this project. This is due to the incorporation of language that limits the size and location of surface parking in the D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, and CG zoning districts. The amended off-street parking ordinance, specifically section 21A.44.060, is included in the ordinance for this transmittal. FB-UN3 INCLUSION The City Council is considering the adoption of the FB-UN3 zone. Due to the potential adoption of this district, staff has added in changes to the Form Based District Chapter and the Design Standards Chapter to make the FB-UN3 zone regulations consistent with the proposed changes to the FB-UN1 and 2 zones. These include changes to open space landscaping requirements that the Council discussed at a work session regarding the FB-UN3 zone. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL Since the positive recommendation from Planning Commission, Planning staff identified potential issues with the proposed Design Standards for the D-1 zoning district. The recommended ordinance includes an upper floor step back requirement of 10’ for buildings between 78’-104’ and 15’ for buildings above 104’ in height. Step backs were introduced to additional districts outside of the CSHBD and FB-UN2 zoning districts. The goal of the step back was to encourage additional light and air in higher density districts. Staff doesn’t believe that the D-1 (Central Business District) warrants a step back to this degree. Staff recommends that the City Council remove this requirement. Staff identified an error to the CSHBD and the FB-UN design standards. The recommended ordinance required all development in the CSHBD districts to incorporate a 15' step back for buildings above 60’ in height. Staff believes that this language is in error and should be reversed to eliminate any amendments to the step backs in the CSHBD districts. All development in the CSHBD districts should incorporate a step back for buildings above 45’ in height. For buildings that abut single or two-family districts, a step back shall be incorporated at 30’. Additionally, development above 30’ in height in the FB-UN districts required a 15’ stepback. This was mistakenly omitted from the draft ordinance. All development above 30’ in the FBUN districts should incorporate a 15’ stepback. The current ordinance reflects these corrections. Additionally, staff found the proposed ground floor use language limiting to strictly residential buildings in specific zoning districts. The language was also confusing and could be difficult to administer. Staff adjusted the language to address these concerns and the attached ordinance reflects this change. Additional alterations include the removal of the dash (-) in the design standard tables for each zoning district. Staff removed the dash and replaced it with a blank for standards that do not apply to specific districts. This change was made for the ease of future amendments. PUBLIC PROCESS: The consultants, Design Workshop, hosted several stakeholder meetings with community council representatives, members of the development community, business and advocacy representatives, Downtown Alliance, as well as the Disability and Accessibility Commission. The stakeholder groups provided vital direction and feedback on where additional building height could be achieved and tolerated, current experience of the downtown area, as well as known issues within applying the existing development regulations. Additionally, a citywide survey was provided to the broader community, in which 456 individuals responded. Stakeholder Meetings: Held as Zoom meetings and attendees participated via Mentimeter. Chambers of Commerce and Development Community – November 30, 2021 Community Council Representatives – December 1, 2021 Community Representatives, including members of the DAAC – December 2, 2021 Downtown Alliance – January 19, 2022 Public Survey: Published on Planning’s website and published via the list serve, Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. The survey was open for 3 weeks and closed on February 24, 2022. Downtown Building Height Website Public Notification: Mailed notification to property owners within the downtown plan area was provided on May 13, 2022. The noticed provided contact information for staff, as well as how to find current drafts of the amendments. Planning Commission Briefing: Planning Commission held a briefing on these amendments on June 8, 2022. PC Briefing Memo Planning Commission Public Hearing: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the text amendments on August 18, 2022. The Planning Commission provided a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendments. Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission (PC) Records: a)PC Agenda for June 8, 2022 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes for June 8, 2022 (Click to Access) c)PC Staff Report for June 8, 2022 (Click to Access) d)PC Agenda of August 24, 2022 (Click to Access) e)PC Staff Report of August 24, 2022 (Click to Access Report) f)PC Minutes for August 24, 2022 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1)Project Chronology 2)Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3)Original Petition 4)Proposed Graphic Changes 5)Public Comment Received after Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2023 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area) An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00529. WHEREAS, on August 24, 2022, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall--at the request of the Salt Lake City Council--to amend land use regulations pertaining to building heights in the Downtown Plan area (Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00529); and WHEREAS, at its August 24, 2022 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Text of Section 21A.26.070. That Section 21A.26.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Commercial Districts: CG General Commercial District), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.26.070: CG GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the CG General Commercial District is to provide an environment for a variety of commercial uses, some of which involve the outdoor display/storage of merchandise or materials. This district provides economic development 2 opportunities through a mix of land uses, including retail sales and services, entertainment, office, residential, heavy commercial and low intensities of manufacturing and warehouse uses. This district is appropriate in locations where supported by applicable master plans and along major arterials. Safe, convenient and inviting connections that provide access to businesses from public sidewalks, bike paths and streets are necessary. Access should follow a hierarchy that places the pedestrian first, bicycle second and automobile third. The standards are intended to create a safe and aesthetically pleasing commercial environment for all users. B. Uses: Uses in the CG General Commercial District as specified in Section 21A.33.030, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts”, of this title are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.26.010 and this section. C. Minimum Lot Size: 1. Minimum Lot Area: 10,000 square feet. 2. Minimum Lot Width: 60’. 3. Existing Lots: Lots legally existing prior to April 12, 1995, shall be considered legal conforming lots. D. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard: Five feet. 2. Corner Side Yard: 10’. 3. Interior Side Yard: None required. 4. Rear Yard: 10’. 5. Buffer Yard: All lots abutting residential property shall conform to the buffer yard requirements of Chapter 21A.48 of this title. 6. Accessory Buildings and Structures in Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required yard subject to Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B of this title. E. Maximum Yard: The maximum yard requirement is 10’. 1. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: a. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or b. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or c. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least five feet in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. 3 2. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 3. All provided front or corner side yards must contain a tree every 30’. 4. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15’ wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansion, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: a. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or b. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 5. Exceptions to this subsection may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. F. Landscape Yard Requirements: A landscape yard of five feet shall be required on all front or corner side yards, conforming to the requirements of Section 21A.48.090 of this title. G. Maximum Height: No building shall exceed 75’ unless the property is within the following boundary: from 400 South to 700 South from 300 West to I-15, where buildings shall not exceed 150’. Additionally, buildings taller than 75’ to a maximum of 105’ outside of the described boundary may be allowed in accordance with the provisions of Subsections G.1 through G.3 of this section. Illustration of Regulation 21A.26.070.G Maximum Height 4 1 No building shall exceed 75’ unless it is within the identified boundaries. 2 Buildings that are outside of the identified boundary higher than 75’ may be allowed in accordance with the provisions of Subsections G.1 through G.3 of this section. 1. Procedure For Modification: A modification to the height regulations, in this Subsection G may be granted through the design review process in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. In evaluating an application submitted pursuant to this section, the planning commission or in the case of an administrative approval the planning director or designee, shall find that the increased height will result in improved site layout and amenities. 2. Outdoor Usable Space: If additional height is approved, the site shall include outdoor usable space for the building occupants that is equal to at least 10% of the gross floor area of the additional floors. The outdoor usable area may be located within a wider park strip that extends further into the right of way than the current park strip, in midblock walkways that include a public access easement, in rooftop gardens, plazas, or in a provided yard that exceeds the minimum yard requirement. The outdoor usable space shall include a minimum dimension of at least 10’ by 10’. 3. Maximum Additional Height for Properties Outside of Boundary Identified in Subsection G: Additional height shall be limited to 30’subject to the provisions in Subsection G.2 for a maximum height of 105’. 5 H. Midblock Walkways: As part of the city’s plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to facilitate pedestrian movement within the area. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown area grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. This requirement implements the city’s Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies – All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever - These coverings may be between 9’ and 14’ above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet; (5) Skybridge – A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. Illustration of Regulation 21A.26.070.H Midblock Walkways 6 1 The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. I. Restrictions on Parking Lots and Structures: An excessive amount of at or above ground parking lots and structures can negatively impact the urban design objectives of the General Commercial (CG) District. To control such impacts, the following regulations shall apply to parking facilities that are at or above ground: 1. Parking shall be located behind principal buildings or incorporated into the principal building provided the parking is wrapped on street facing facades with a use allowed in the zone other than parking. 2. Parking lots not wholly behind the principal building are limited to no more than two double-loaded parking aisles (bays) adjacent to each other. The length of a parking lot shall not exceed 10 stalls. 3. No special restrictions shall apply to belowground parking facilities. 4. Parking structures shall conform to the requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.37 of this title. 5. All parking lot and structure landscaping must comply with the provisions set forth in Chapter 21A.48 of this title. SECTION 2. Amending the Text of Section 21A.27.020. That Section 21A.27.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Form Based Districts: Building Types and Forms Established), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 7 21A.27.020: BUILDING TYPES AND FORMS ESTABLISHED: A. Building Types and Form Standards: 1. Encourage building forms that are compatible with the neighborhood and the future vision for the neighborhood by acknowledging the current scale of the area and it’s architectural and material elements. These elements within new development shall compliment those of the existing buildings; 2. Arrange building heights and scale to provide appropriate transitions between buildings of different scales and adjacent areas, especially between different subdistricts; 3. Guide building orientation through setbacks and other requirements to create a consistent street edge, enhance walkability by addressing the relationship between public and private spaces, and ensure architectural design will contribute to the character of the neighborhood; 4. Use building form, placement, and orientation to identify the private, semiprivate, and public spaces; 5. Minimize the visual impact of parking areas; and 6. Minimize conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. B. Building Types and Forms: 1. Description: The permitted building forms are described in this subsection. Each building form includes a general description and definition, as well as images of what the building form may look like. Building form images are for informational purposes only and not intended to demonstrate exactly what shall be built. The description and images should be used to classify existing and proposed buildings in order to determine what development regulations apply. The drawings are not to scale. They should not be used to dictate a specific architectural style as both traditional and contemporary styles can be used. a. Urban House: A residential structure with the approximate scale of a single dwelling unit, as viewed from the street, but may contain up to two dwelling units. The structure has a single entry facing the street, a front porch or stoop, and a small front yard. Second units may be arranged vertically (up and down) or horizontally (front and back), but the entry to the second unit is from the side, rear, or interior of structure. A third unit may also be located along an alley as a stand alone unit or as a dwelling unit located in an accessory building. All units are on a single lot. 8 9 b. Two-Family Dwelling: A residential structure that contains two dwelling units in a single building. The units may be arranged side by side, up and down, or front and back. Each unit has its own separate entry directly to the outside. Dwellings may be located on separate lots or grouped on one lot. A third unit may also be located along an alley as a stand alone unit or as a dwelling unit located in an accessory building, but may not be located on a separate lot. 10 c. Cottage Development: A unified development that contains two or more detached dwelling units with each unit appearing to be a small single-family dwelling with 11 a common green or open space area. Dwellings may be located on separate lots or grouped on one lot. d. Additional Development Standards for Cottage Building Forms: (1) Setbacks Between Individual Cottages: All cottages shall have a minimum setback of eight feet from another cottage. (2) Footprint: No cottage shall have a footprint in excess of 850 square feet. (3) Building Entrance: All building entrances shall face a public street or a common open space area. (4) Open Space Area: A minimum of 250 square feet of common, open space area is required per cottage. At least 50% of the open space area shall be contiguous and include landscaping, walkways or other amenities intended to serve the residents of the development. 12 e. Row House: A series of attached single-family dwellings that share at least one common wall with an adjacent dwelling unit. A row house contains a minimum of three residential dwelling units. Each unit may be on its own lot. If possible, off street parking is accessed from an alley. 13 14 f. Multi-Family Residential: A multi-family residential structure containing three or more dwelling units that may be arranged in a number of configurations. 15 16 g. Storefront: A commercial structure that may have multiple stories and contain a variety of commercial uses that are allowed in the district that permits this building type. All buildings, regardless of the specific use, have a ground floor that looks like a storefront. 17 18 h. Vertical Mixed Use: A multi-story building that contains a mix of commercial and/or office with residential uses. 19 20 C. Building Form Standards: 1. The provisions of this section shall apply to all properties located within the Form Based Districts as indicated on the maps in each Form Based District. 2. Building form and street type standards apply to all new buildings and additions when the new construction related to the addition is greater than 25% of the footprint of the structure or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less. Refer to Section 21A.27.030 of this chapter on the building configuration standards for more information on how to comply with the standards. The graphics included provide a visual representation of the standards as a guide and are not meant to supersede the standards in the tables. Only building forms identified in the table are permitted. SECTION 3. Amending the Text of Section 21A.27.030. That Section 21A.27.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Form Based Districts: Building Configuration and Design Standards), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.27.030: BUILDING CONFIGURATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS: A. Specific Intent of Configuration and Design Standards: 1. Design Related Standards: The design related standards are intended to do the following: 21 a. Implement applicable master plans; b. Continue the existing physical character of residential streets while allowing an increase in building scale along arterials and near transit stations; c. Focus development and future growth in the city along arterials and near transit stations; d. Arrange buildings so they are oriented toward the street in a manner that promotes pedestrian activity, safety, and community; e. Provide human scaled buildings that emphasize design and placement of the main entrance/exit on street facing facades; f. Provide connections to transit through public walkways; g. Provide areas for appropriate land uses that encourage use of public transit and are compatible with the neighborhood; h. Promote pedestrian and bicycle amenities near transit facilities to maximize alternative forms of transportation; and i. Rehabilitate and reuse existing residential structures in the Form Based Zoning Districts when possible to efficiently use infrastructure and natural resources, and preserve neighborhood character. B. Building Entry: Refer to the building entrance standards in Subsection 21A.37.050.D of this title. 1. Entry Feature: The following building entries are permitted as indicated: TABLE 21A.27.030.B ENTRY FEATURE STANDARDS Entry Feature Permitted Based on Building Form Type Urban House Cottage Development Two- Family Dwelling Row House Multi- Family Storefront Vertical Mixed Use Porch and fence: A planted front yard where the street facing building facade is set back from the front property line with an attached porch that is P P P P P P 22 permitted to encroach into the required yard. The porch shall be a minimum of 6’ in depth. The front yard may include a fence no taller than 3’ in height Reference Illustration - Porch and Fence Entry Feature Permitted Based on Building Form Type Urban House Cottage Development Two- Family Dwelling Row House Multi- Family Storefront Vertical Mixed Use Terrace or lightwell: An entry feature where the street facing facade is set back from the front property line by an elevated P P P P P P P 23 terrace or sunken lightwell. May include a canopy or roof Reference Illustration - Terrace or Lightwell Entry Feature Permitted Based on Building Form Type Urban House Cottage Development Two- Family Dwelling Row House Multi- Family Storefront Vertical Mixed Use Forecourt: An entry feature wherein a portion of the street facing facade is close to the property line and the central portion is set back. The court created must be landscaped, contain outdoor plazas, outdoor dining areas, P P P P P P P 24 private yards, or other similar features that encourage use and seating Reference Illustration - Forecourt Entry Feature Permitted Based on Building Form Type Urban House Cottage Development Two- Family Dwelling Row House Multi- Family Storefront Vertical Mixed Use Stoop: An entry feature wherein the street facing facade is close to the front property line and the first story is elevated from the sidewalk sufficiently to secure privacy for the windows. The entrance contains an exterior stair and landing that is either parallel or P P P P P P P 25 perpendicular to the street. Recommended for ground floor residential uses Reference Illustration - Stoop Entry Feature Permitted Based on Building Form Type Urban House Cottage Development Two- Family Dwelling Row House Multi- Family Storefront Vertical Mixed Use Shopfront: An entry feature where the street facing facade is close to the property line and building entrance is at sidewalk grade. Building entry is covered with an awning, canopy, or is recessed from the front building facade, which defines the entry and P P P P 26 provides protection for customers Reference Illustration - Shopfront Entry Feature Permitted Based on Building Form Type Urban House Cottage Development Two- Family Dwelling Row House Multi- Family Storefront Vertical Mixed Use Gallery: A building entry where the ground floor is no more than 10’ from the front property line and the upper levels or roofline cantilevers from the ground floor facade up to the front property line P P P Reference Illustration - Gallery 27 C. Additional Design Standards Required for Form Based Districts: 1. Open Space Area: A minimum of 10% of the lot area shall be provided for open space area, unless a different requirement is specified in the building form regulation. Individual districts may require additional open space area requirements. Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. a. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. b. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. i. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; ii. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; iii. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; iv. Trees with a minimum spread of 20’ at mature height to shade a minimum of 33% of the open space area; and/or v. landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 28 2. Residential Balconies: All street facing residential units above the ground floor or level shall contain a usable balcony facing the street that is a minimum of four feet in depth. Balconies may overhang any required yard. 3. Design Standards Alternatives: a. Alternatives to Required Build-To Line: Where a “required build-to” standard applies, the following alternatives may count toward the minimum build-to requirement as indicated: (1) Landscaping Walls: Landscaping walls between 24” and 42” high may count up to 25% toward the minimum requirement provided the following: (A) The wall incorporates seating areas. (B) The wall is constructed of masonry, concrete, stone or ornamental metal. (C) The wall maintains clear view sightlines where sidewalks and pedestrian connections intersect vehicle drive aisles or streets. (2) Pergolas and Trellises: Pergolas and trellises may count up to 25% toward the minimum build-to requirement provided the following: (A) The structure is at least 48” deep as measured perpendicular to the property line. (B) A vertical clearance of at least eight feet is maintained above the walking path of pedestrians. (C) Vertical supports are constructed of wood, stone, concrete or metal with a minimum of six inches by six inches or a radius of at least four inches. 29 (D) The structure maintains clear view sightlines where sidewalks and pedestrian connections intersect vehicle drive aisles or streets. (3) Arcades: Arcades may count up to 100% toward the minimum requirement provided the following: (A) The arcade extends no more than two stories in height. (B) No portion of the arcade structure encroaches onto public property. (C) The arcade maintains a minimum pedestrian walkway of five feet. (D) The interior wall of the arcade complies with the building configuration standards. (4) Plazas and Outdoor Dining: Plazas and outdoor dining areas may count up to 50% toward the minimum requirement, and have a maximum front setback of up to 15’ provided the following: (A) The plaza or outdoor dining is between the property line adjacent to the street and the street facing building facade. (B) Shall be within two feet of grade with the public sidewalk. (C) The building entry shall be clearly visible through the courtyard or plaza. (D) The building facades along the courtyard or plaza shall comply with the ground floor transparency requirement. b. Alternatives to Ground Floor Transparency Requirement: The planning director may modify the ground floor transparency requirement in the following instances: (1) The requirement would negatively impact the historical character of a building within the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; or (2) The requirement conflicts with the structural integrity of the building and the structure would comply with the standard to the extent possible. 4. Permitted Encroachments and Height Exceptions: Obstructions and height exceptions are permitted as listed in this section or in Section 21A.36.020 of this title or as indicated in this subsection. a. Building Height: In order to promote a varied skyline and other roof shapes in the area, structures with a sloped roof may exceed the maximum building height in the form based districts by five feet provided: (1) The additional height does not include additional living space. Vaulted ceilings, storage spaces, and utility spaces are permitted. 30 (2) The slope of the roof is a minimum of a twelve-four pitch or a quarter barrel shape. b. Roof Top Gardens: Building height encroachments for rooftop uses are permitted to encroach up to 6 feet to accommodate rooftop gardens and/or outdoor living space provided: (1) The rooftop garden includes vegetation that covers a minimum of 15% of the outdoor living space on the roof. The vegetation coverage shall be calculated by utilizing the spread of any trees, shrubs, or ground cover at maturity. (2) If the rooftop is used for non-residential land uses allowed in the zone and located adjacent to the FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District, single-family district, or two-family district, a six foot wall shall be installed along the entire length of the outdoor space facing such zones. 31 5. Pedestrian Connections: Where required, the following pedestrian connection standards apply: a. The connection shall provide direct access from any building entry to the public sidewalk or walkway. b. The connection shall comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessibility. c. The connection shall be fully paved and have a minimum width of four feet (4’). d. The connection shall be separated from vehicle drive approaches and drive lanes by a change in grade and a wheel stop if the walkway is less than eight feet (8’) wide. e. Pedestrian connections that lead directly from the sidewalk to the primary building entrance may contain wing walls, no taller than two feet (2’) in height for seating, landscaping, etc. D. Other Applicable Development Standards: All uses in the form based districts shall comply with the standards set in Part IV, Regulations of General Applicability, of this title, including the appliable standards in the following chapters: 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8. 21A.46 Signs 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 10. Any other applicable chapter of this title that may include applicable provisions. E. Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District specific standards for detached or accessory parking garages or structures: 1. Detached or accessory multilevel parking garages or structures shall have the same setback requirements for principal structures. 2. When a required setback abuts a residential district, the minimum setback required shall be a landscape yard to provide a buffer to the abutting residential district. No structure (primary or accessory) shall be permitted within this landscaped buffer. 32 SECTION 4. Amending the Text of Subsection 21A.27.050.C. That Subsection 21A.27.050.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Form Based Districts: FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District: FB-UN2 Building Form Standards), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: C. FB-UN2 Building Form Standards: Building form standards are listed in Tables 21A.27.050.C.1 through 21A.27.050.C.3 of this section. 1. Cottage Development Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.C.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Cottage Development H Height 30’ maximum. All heights measured from the established grade. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Provided front or corner side yard shall provide one tree for every 30 linear foot of front or corner side yard property line. The mature tree canopy must cover at least 50% of the required yard area and sidewalk area. S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 6’. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ between cottage building form and rear property line. SC Separation between Cottages Minimum of 10’, measured from the outside perimeter wall of the principal structure. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030.B for allowed entry features. Dwelling units adjacent to a street must include an entry feature on the street facing façade. Pedestrian connections with minimum of 5’ width required to each required entry feature. OS Open space Area At least 25% of the total land area of the cottage development shall be maintained as an open space area that complies with the requirements of Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 “Open Space Area.” 33 BF Building forms per lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot. Individual lots without street frontage may be created provided each lot has legally established access to a public street that includes a minimum 5’ wide solid surface walkway. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly adjacent to a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. L Lots without Street Frontage Lots for individual cottage units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access for pedestrians and vehicles to a public street by way of a minimum 5’ wide solid surface walkway, easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s). The requirements for the disclosure of private infrastructure costs shall be the same as required for planned developments per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway As part of the city’s plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to increase pedestrian connectivity and overall livability downtown through the creation of an intricate pedestrian network. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes the need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within this district shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: F. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. G. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. H. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies – All balconies must be located at the third story or above. 34 2. Row House Building Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.C.2 (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever – These coverings may be between 9 and 14 feet above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of 6’ and project no closer to the curb than 3’. (5) Skybridge – A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the 3rd, 4th, or 5th stories. (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. DS Design Standards See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 35 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’; All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. The height of the railing/parapet is limited to the height required to meet building code requirements. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’ and maximum 15’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. This requirement may be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). Provided front or corner side yard shall provide one tree for every 30 linear foot of front or corner side yard property line. The mature tree canopy must cover at least 50% of the required yard area and sidewalk area. S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 6’ between row house building form and side property line. Minimum of 10’ along a side property line when abutting a property in a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 35’ or less. No setback is required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ between row house building form and rear property line, except when rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 35’ or less, then the minimum is 25’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates the subject property from another property shall be counted towards the minimum setback. U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030.B for allowed entry features. Dwelling units adjacent to a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections with minimum 5’ width required to each required entry feature. U Upper level Stepback When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 35’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’, measured from finished grade, shall stepback 10’ from the building facade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. 36 OS Open space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. Tree canopy at maturity shall count toward the vegetation requirement, BF Building Forms per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly adjacent to a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway As part of the city’s plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to facilitate pedestrian movement within the area. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow maximum building heights that exceeds those of other districts in the city, the requirement for the midblock walkway is important to maintain the overall scale and pedestrian nature of the downtown. This requirement implements the city’s Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: a. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. The following building encroachments are permitted in a midblock walkway. Under no circumstances shall a midblock walkway be entirely covered. 37 3. Multi-family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-use building form standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.C.3 (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever: These coverings may be between nine and fourteen feet above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet; (5) Skybridge: A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. DS Design Standards See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 50’.1 All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop use is permitted and required railings and walls necessary to comply with building code requirements are permitted to encroach beyond the maximum height up to 5’. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height of 14’. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Ground Floor Residential Uses: A minimum of 10’ and a maximum of 20’. Ground Floor occupied by retail, restaurants, taverns, brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities: no minimum is required, provided no doors open into the right of way. A maximum setback of up to 10’ is allowed. All other ground floor uses: A minimum of 5’ and a maximum 10’. The maximum may be increased due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. 38 This requirement may be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). Provided front or corner side yard shall provide one tree for every 30 linear foot of front or corner side yard property line. The mature tree canopy must cover at least 50% of the required yard area and sidewalk area. S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 6’ required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a property in a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 35’ or less, then the minimum shall be 15’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall be counted towards the minimum setback. R Rear Yard The rear yard minimum shall be 10’, except when rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a property in a different zoning district shall be counted towards the minimum setback. GU Ground Floor Use Requirem ents 900 South: The ground floor use space facing 900 South shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities for a depth of 25’. Amenity space for the occupants of the building shall account for no more than 25% of the length of the ground floor space. E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units adjacent to a street must have an allowed entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030.B for allowed entry features. U Upper Level Stepback When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall stepback 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley M W Midblock Walkway As part of the city’s plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to facilitate pedestrian movement within the area. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow 39 maximum building heights that exceeds those of other districts in the city, the requirement for the midblock walkway is important to maintain the overall scale and pedestrian nature of the downtown. This requirement implements the city’s Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within this district shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. The following building encroachments are permitted in midblock walkway. Under no circumstances shall a mid block walkway be entirely covered. (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies – All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever - These coverings may be between 9 and 14’ above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of 6’ and project no closer to the curb than 3’; (5) Skybridge – A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area As required in Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 “Open Space Area.” 40 Footnotes: 1. Additional Building Height Regulations. Properties listed in this footnote shall have a permitted building height of up to 65’ and 5 stories. a. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of West Temple at 800 South or 900 South; b. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of 200 West at 700 South, 800 South or 900 South; c. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of West Temple at Fayette Avenue; d. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of 300 West at 800 South or 900 South; e. On the southeast corner of 1300 South and State Street. f. As indicated on the following map: DS Design Standards See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 41 SECTION 5. Amending the Text of Chapter 21A.30. That Chapter 21A.30 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Downtown Districts), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 21A.30 DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS SECTION: 21A.30.010: General Provisions 21A.30.020: D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030: D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040: D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045: D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District 21A.30.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: 42 A. Statement of Intent: The downtown districts are intended to provide use, bulk, urban design and other controls and regulations appropriate to the commercial core of the city and adjacent areas in order to enhance employment opportunities; to encourage the efficient use of land; to enhance property values; to improve the design quality of downtown areas; to create a unique downtown center which fosters the arts, entertainment, financial, office, retail and governmental activities; to provide safety and security; encourage permitted residential uses within the downtown area; and to help implement adopted plans. B. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title are permitted; provided, that they comply with all requirements of this chapter, the general standards set forth in Part IV of this title, and all other applicable requirements of this title. 1. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title, may be allowed in the downtown districts provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in Chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements. C. Impact Controls and General Restrictions in the Downtown Districts: 1. Refuse Control: Refuse containers must be covered and shall be stored within completely enclosed buildings or screened in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 21A.48 of this title. For buildings existing as of April 12, 1995, this screening provision shall be required if the floor area or parking requirements are increased by twenty five percent (25%) or more by an expansion to the building or change in the type of land use. 2. Lighting: On site lighting, including parking lot lighting and illuminated signs, shall be located, directed or designed in such a manner so as not to create glare on adjacent properties. D. Outdoor Sales, Display and Storage: “Sales and display (outdoor)” and “storage and display (outdoor)”, as defined in Chapter 21A.62 of this title, are allowed where specifically authorized in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title. These uses shall conform to the following: 1. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not encroach into areas of required parking for periods longer than 30 days; 2. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not be located in any required yard area within the lot when the required yard abuts a residential zoning district; 3. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not include the use of banners, pennants or strings of pennants; 43 4. Outdoor storage shall be allowed only where specifically authorized in the applicable district regulation and shall be required to be fully screened with opaque fencing not to exceed eight feet in height; and 5. Outdoor sales and display and outdoor storage shall also be permitted when part of an authorized temporary use as established in Chapter 21A.42 of this title. E. Restrictions on Parking Lots and Structures: An excessive amount of at or above ground parking lots and structures can negatively impact the urban design objectives of the Downtown Zoning Districts. To control such impacts, the following regulations apply to surface parking and above grade structures: 1. Parking shall be located behind principal buildings or incorporated into the principal building provided the parking is wrapped on street facing facades with a use allowed in the zone other than parking. 2. A parking lot shall not consist of more than two double-loaded parking aisles (bays) adjacent to each other. The length of a parking lot shall not exceed 10 stalls. Parking for government facilities necessary for public health and safety are exempt from this provision. Illustration of Regulation 21A.010.E.2 Surface Parking Lots 3. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street and that would result in a building demolition are prohibited in the Downtown zoning districts. 4. No special restrictions shall apply to belowground parking facilities. 44 F. Midblock Walkways: As part of the city’s plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to increase pedestrian connectivity and overall livability downtown through the creation of an intricate pedestrian network. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above. (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever - These coverings may be between 9 and 14’ above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet. (5) Skybridge: A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories. (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. Illustration of Regulation 21A.30.010.F Midblock Walkways 45 1 The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. G. Sidewalks: For all downtown districts, sidewalks must be a clear walking path that is a minimum of 10’ wide. Outdoor dining shall be permitted within the sidewalk if it complies with the minimum width of a clear path as defined in the outdoor dining design guidelines. H. Additional Standards: All uses in the downtown districts shall comply with the standards set in Part IV, Regulations of General Applicability, of this title, including the applicable standards in the following chapters: 1. 21A.36 General Provisions 2. 21A.37 Design Standards 3. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 4. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 5. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 6. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 7. 21A.46 Signs 8. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 9. Any other applicable chapter of this title that may include applicable provisions. 21A.30.020: D-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-1 Central Business District is to provide for commercial and economic development within Salt Lake City’s most urban and intense areas. A broad range of uses, including very high density housing, are intended to foster a 46 24 hour activity environment consistent with the area’s function as the business, office, retail, entertainment, cultural and tourist center of the region. Development is intended to be very intense with high lot coverage and large buildings that are placed close together while being oriented toward the pedestrian with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape and preserving the urban nature of the downtown area. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to achieve established objectives for urban design, pedestrian amenities and land use control. B. Uses: Uses in the D-1 Central Business District as specified in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.30.010 of this chapter. C. D-1 Central Business District General Regulations: The regulations established in this section apply to the D-1 Central Business District as a whole 1. Yard Requirements: No minimum yards are required. A maximum yard of eight feet is allowed. a. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: i. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or ii. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or iii. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least five feet in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15’ wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: i. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or ii. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 47 d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. e. Interior Side Yards: No minimum interior side yard is required. f. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required. 4. Landscape Requirements for Demolition Sites: Vacant lots, resulting from demolition activities where no replacement use is proposed, shall conform to Chapter 21A.48 of this title, special landscape requirements applicable to the D-1 Central Business District. D. Height Regulations: Buildings in the D-1 zoning district shall comply with the following provisions: 1. Building Heights: No building shall be less than 100’. There is no maximum building height, subject to standards contained in Subsections 21A.30.020.D.2 through D.3. 2. Exceptions to the minimum height requirements are as follows: a. Utility Buildings necessary to provide electricity, water, sewer, storm water, and other necessary utility services to the downtown area. b. Accessory building and structures, including accessory buildings that serve public transportation, downtown improvement districts, and other public maintenance buildings. c. Buildings on lots or parcels that are less than 5,000 square feet in size. d. Buildings with a footprint of less than 2,500 square feet. e. Building approved through the design review process in Chapter 21A.59. 2. Buildings in excess of 100’, are allowed subject to the following standard: a. A minimum stepback of five feet or other architectural feature that can deflect snow and ice from falling directly onto a sidewalk, midblock walkway, or other public space. The stepback may be located above the height of the first floor and below 150’ in height above the sidewalk or public space. Buildings that are not clad in glass are exempt from this requirement. 3. Buildings in excess of 200’ with no limit and subject to Chapter 21A.59, Design Review, shall include at least one of the following five options: a. Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the midblock walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions of Subsection 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet. This option allows for additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway requirements; or 48 b. The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified in Chapter 21A.52 of this title; or c. The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum requirement for ground floor uses identified in chapter 21A.37 (Design Standards) of this title, specifically: (1) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to 100%. This option requires that the entire ground floor use of a building consists of retail good establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters, performing art facilities or similar uses that encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement; or (2) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased to 85% and the visual interest requirement must be increased to 15%. This option requires an increased percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased percentage of the building to provide visual interest; d. The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a building that is 50 years or older, or a building that is a nationally recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum of 50 years. e. The proposal includes a privately owned, publicly accessible open space on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of the property. The space shall be a minimum of 500 square feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at least 60% of the open space area. This option allows for additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. E. Special Controls Over the Main Street Retail Core: 1. Intent: Special controls shall apply to land located within the Main Street retail core area to preserve and enhance the viability of retail uses within the downtown area. The regulations of this subsection shall be in addition to the requirements of Subsections C and D of this section. 2. Area of Applicability: The controls established in this subsection shall apply to property developed or redeveloped after April 12, 1995, when located along any block face on the following streets: a. Main Street located within the D-1 District; 49 b. 100 South Street between West Temple Street and State Street; c. 200 South Street between West Temple Street and State Street; and d. 300 South Street between West Temple Street and State Street. 3. First Floor Retail Required: The first floor space of all buildings within this area shall be required to provide uses consisting of retail goods establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters or performing arts facilities. 4. Restrictions on Driveways: Driveways shall not be permitted along Main Street, but shall be permitted along other streets within the Main Street retail core area, provided they are located at least 80’ from the intersection of two street right of way lines. 21A.30.030: D-2 DOWNTOWN SUPPORT DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-2 Downtown Support District is to provide an area that fosters the development of a sustainable urban neighborhood that accommodates commercial, office, residential and other uses that relate to and support the Central Business District. Development within the D-2 Downtown Support District is intended to be less intensive than that of the Central Business District, with high lot coverage and buildings placed close to the sidewalk. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. Design standards are intended to promote pedestrian oriented development with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape. B. Uses: Uses in the D-2 Downtown Support District, as specified in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.30.010 of this chapter and this section. C. Lot Size Requirements: No minimum lot area or lot width shall be required. D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum permitted building height shall not exceed 120’ subject to the following review process: Buildings over 65’ in height are subject to design review according to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. E. Yard Requirements: 1. Front and Corner Side Yard: There is no minimum setback. The maximum setback is 10 feet. Buildings that contain ground floor residential uses shall have a front yard setback of a minimum of 8’ and a maximum setback no greater than 16’. A provided yard for any use shall be considered a landscaped yard and subject to the provisions of Chapter 21A.48 for required landscaped yards. a. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: 50 i. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or ii. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or iii. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5’ in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15’ wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: i. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or ii. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 2. Interior Side Yards: No Minimum side yard is required except a minimum of 10’ is required when the side yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35’ or less. 3. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required except a minimum of 10’ is required when the rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35’ or less. 4. Buffer Yards: Any lot abutting a lot in a residential district shall conform to the buffer yard requirements of Chapter 21A.48 of this title or the above standards, whichever is greater. F. Existing Vehicle Sales or Lease Lots: 1. Vehicle Display Area: The parking provided in the vehicle display area will not be counted as off street parking when computing maximum parking requirements and is not considered to be a surface parking lot when determining required setbacks in this section. 2. Design Standards: Structures associated with accessory uses such as, but not limited to, repair shops or vehicle washing do not need to meet required design standards and 51 may exceed the maximum front and corner side yard setbacks. These structures are required to have one of the following elements listed below: a. Durable materials, as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.B; or b. Landscaping. Primary structures that contain sales floors and auto display areas must meet all design standards and setbacks. 3. Landscaping: A landscaped yard of at least 10’ in depth is required along any portion of the street frontage of the property that is not occupied by a permanent structure. All other landscaping requirements in Chapter 21A.48 remain applicable. 4. Multiple Buildings: Vehicle sales or lease lots may have multiple buildings on a parcel subject to all buildings being associated with the use of the lot as vehicles sales or lease. 21A.30.040: D-3 DOWNTOWN WAREHOUSE/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District is to provide for the reuse of existing warehouse buildings for multi-family and mixed use while also allowing for continued retail, office and warehouse uses within the district. The reuse of existing buildings and the construction of new buildings are to be done as multi-family residential or mixed use developments containing retail or office uses on the lower floors and residential on the upper floors. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to create a unique and sustainable downtown neighborhood with a strong emphasis on urban design, adaptive reuse of existing buildings, alternative forms of transportation and pedestrian orientation. B. Uses: Uses in the D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District as specified in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title, are permitted subject to the provisions of this chapter and other applicable provisions of this title. C. Lot Size Requirements: No minimum lot area or lot width shall be required. D. Yard Requirements: There are no minimum setbacks, except for buildings that contain ground floor residential uses in which case the front yard setback shall be a minimum of 8’ and no greater than 16’. A provided front yard for any use shall be considered a landscaped yard and subject to the provision of Chapter 21A.48 for required landscaped yards. The maximum front yard setback shall be eight feet for all other uses. 52 1. The yard must be designed with usability as a consideration. Development that implements the maximum yard is required to have at least one of the following elements: a. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or b. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or c. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5’ in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. 2. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 3. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15’ wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: a. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or b. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 4. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. E. Maximum Building Height: Buildings in the D3 zoning district shall comply with the following provisions: 1. The permitted building height shall not exceed 75’. 2. Buildings taller than 75’ but less than 180’ may be allowed subject to the following provisions: a. Approval is subject to Chapter 21A.59 Design Review: (1) Provided the additional height is supported by the applicable master plan. (2) The building includes at least one of the following five options: (A) Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the midblock walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions of Subsection 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet. This option allows for additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway requirements; 53 (B) The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified in Chapter 21A.52 of this title; (C) The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum requirement for ground floor uses identified in Chapter 21A.37 (Design Standards) of this title, specifically: (i) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to 100%. This option requires that the entire ground floor use of a building consists of retail good establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters, performing art facilities or similar uses that encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement; or (ii) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased to 75% and the visual interest requirement must be increased to 25%. This option requires for an increased percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased percentage of the building to provide visual interest; (D) The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a building that is 50 years or older, or a building that is a nationally recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum of 50 years; or (E) The proposal includes a privately owned, publicly accessible open space on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of the property. The space shall be a minimum of 500 square feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at least 60% of the open space area. This option allows for additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. 21A.30.045: D-4 DOWNTOWN SECONDARY CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the D-4 Secondary Central Business District is to foster an environment consistent with the area’s function as a housing, entertainment, cultural, convention, business, and retail section of the city that supports the Central Business District. Development is intended to support the regional venues in the district, 54 such as the Salt Palace Convention Center, and to be less intense than in the Central Business District. This district is appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to achieve established objectives for urban and historic design, pedestrian amenities, and land use control, particularly in relation to retail commercial uses. B. Uses: Uses in the D-4 Secondary Central Business District as specified in Section 21A.33.050, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts”, of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in Section 21A.30.010 of this chapter. In addition, all conditional uses in the D-4 District shall be subject to design evaluation and approval by the planning commission. C. Minimum Lot Size: No minimum lot area or lot width is required. D. Yard Requirements: 1. Front and Corner Side Yards: No minimum yards are required, however, a maximum front yard setback of eight feet is allowed. a. The yard must be designed with the usability as a consideration. Development that implements the maximum yard is required to have at least one of the following elements: i. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; ii. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or iii. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5’ in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15’ wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: i. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or ii. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 55 d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 2. Interior Side Yards: No minimum side yard is required except a minimum of 10’ is required when the side yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35’ or less. 3. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required except a minimum of 10’ is required when the rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted height of 35’ or less. E. Building Height: Buildings in the D-4 zoning district shall comply with the following provisions: 1. The permitted building height shall not exceed 75’. 2. Buildings taller than 75’ and up to 120’may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. a. Additional Height: Additional height may be authorized up to 120’ if the street facing facades contain ground floor commercial uses other than parking for at least 75% of the street facing facades according to Chapter 21A.37 and subject to approval through the design review process in Chapter 21A.59. b. Additional Permitted Height Location: Additional height greater than 120’ but not more than 375’ in height is permitted in the area bounded by: (1) The centerlines of South Temple, West Temple, 200 South, and 200 West Streets; and (2) Beginning at the Southeast Corner of Block 67, Plat ‘A’, Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence along the south line of said Block 67, N89°54’02”W 283.86 feet; thence N00°04’50”E 38.59 feet; thence N10°46’51”W 238.70 feet; thence N24°45’15”W 62.98 feet; thence S89°54’02”E 355.45 feet to the east line of said Block 67; thence along said east line S00°06’35”W 330.14 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 102,339 square feet, or 2.349 acres, more or less. 56 3. Buildings in excess of 120’ up to 375’ may be authorized subject to the following provisions: a. Approval is subject to Chapter 21A.59 Design Review; b. Shall include a minimum stepback of five feet or other architectural feature that can deflect snow and ice from falling directly onto a sidewalk, midblock walkway, or other public space. The stepback may be located above the height of the first floor and below 120’ in height above the sidewalk or public space. Buildings that are clad in glass that totals less than 50% of the total wall surface area are exempt from this requirement; c. The additional height is supported by the applicable master plan; and d. The building includes at least one of the following five options: 1. Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the midblock walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions of Section 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet. This option allows for additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway requirements; 2. The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified in chapter 21A.52 of this title; 3. The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum requirement for ground floor uses identified in Chapter 21A.37 (Design Standards) of this title, specifically: (1) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to 100%. This option 57 requires that the entire ground floor use of a building consists of retail good establishments, retail service establishments or restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art galleries, motion picture theaters, performing art facilities or similar uses that encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement.; or (2) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased to 75% and the visual interest requirement must be increased to 25%. This option requires for an increased percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased percentage of the building to provide visual interest; (D) The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a building that is 50 years or older, or a building that is a nationally recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum of 50 years. (E) The proposal includes a privately owned, publicly accessible open space on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of the property. The space shall be a minimum of 500 square feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at least 60% of the open space area. This option allows for additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. e. Exception: The first 50’ of height shall not be set back from the street front more than five feet except that setbacks greater than five feet may be approved through the design review process or, has otherwise allowed by this code. SECTION 6. Amending the Text of Chapter 21A.31. That Chapter 21A.30 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Gateway Districts), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 21A.31 GATEWAY DISTRICTS SECTION: 21A.31.010: General Provisions 21A.31.020: G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District 58 21A.31.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Statement of Intent: The G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District is intended to provide an urban setting for residential and commercial, developments, and implement the objectives of the Downtown Plan through district regulations that reinforce the mixed use character of the area and encourage the development of urban neighborhoods containing supportive retail, service commercial, office, and high density residential. B. Uses: Uses in the G-MU Gateway-Mixed District as specified in Section 21A.33.060, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District”, of this title, are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in this section. C. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses, in Section 21A.33.060, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District”, of this title are permitted; provided, that they comply with all requirements of this chapter, the general standards set forth in Part IV of this title, and all other applicable requirements of this title. D. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in Section 21A.33.060, “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District”, of this title, shall be permitted in the G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in Chapter 21A.54 of this title. E. Midblock Walkways: As part of the city’s plan for the downtown area, it is intended that midblock walkways be provided to increase pedestrian connectivity and overall livability downtown through the creation of an intricate pedestrian network. The city has adopted the Downtown Plan that includes a midblock walkway map and establishes a need for such walkways as the Downtown grows. Because the districts within the downtown area allow building heights that exceed those of other districts in the city, the requirement for a midblock walkway is considered to be necessary to alleviate pedestrian impacts on the public sidewalks by dispersing future use of the public sidewalks. This requirement implements the city’s Downtown Plan and provides visual relief from the additional height that is available in these zone districts when compared to the remainder of the city. All buildings constructed after the effective date hereof within the Downtown zoning districts shall conform to this officially adopted plan for midblock walkways, in addition to the following standards: 1. Any new development shall provide a midblock walkway if a midblock walkway on the subject property has been identified in a master plan that has been adopted by the city. 2. The following standards apply to the midblock walkway: a. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. 59 b. The midblock walkway may be incorporated into the building provided it is open to the public. A sign shall be posted indicating that the public may use the walkway. c. Building encroachments into the midblock walkway are permitted if they include one or more of the following elements: (1) Colonnades; (2) Staircases; (3) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above; (4) Building overhangs and associated cantilever - These coverings may be between 9 and 14’ above the level of the sidewalk. They shall provide a minimum depth of coverage of six feet and project no closer to the curb than three feet; (5) Skybridge: A single skybridge is permitted. All skybridges must be located at the third, fourth, or fifth stories; and (6) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offers refuge from weather and/or provide publicly accessible usable space. Illustration of Regulation 21A.31.010.E2 Midblock Walkways 1 The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 15’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. F. Modifications of Standards: A modification to the provisions of this chapter may be granted through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 60 G. Midblock Street Development: Developments constructing midblock streets, either privately owned with a public easement or publicly dedicated, that are desired by an applicable master plan: 1. May transfer a portion or all of the above ground development square footage of the proposed new midblock street to other land within the proposed development. 2. May increase the height of the building on the remaining land within the development site to a height necessary to accommodate the development square footage of the proposed right of way that is being transferred. 3. Any proposal under this section shall be subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. H. Parking: 1. Belowground Parking Facilities: No special design and setback restrictions shall apply to belowground parking facilities. 2. Landscape Requirements: Surface parking lots shall have a landscaped setback of at least 20’ and meet interior landscaped requirements as outlined in Chapter 21A.48 of this title. 3. Design Review Approval: A modification to the restrictions on parking lots and structures provisions of this section may be granted through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. Such conditional uses shall also be subject to urban design evaluation. 4. Parking structures shall conform to the requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.37 of this title. I. Outdoor Sales, Display and Storage: “Sales and display (outdoor)” and “storage and display (outdoor)”, is permitted for retail uses and the retail components of other permitted and conditional uses authorized in Section 21A.33.060 “Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District. These uses shall conform to the following: 1. Outdoor sales and display and outdoor storage may also be permitted when part of an authorized temporary use as established in Chapter 21A.42 of this title; 2. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not encroach into areas of required parking for longer than 30 days; 3. The outdoor permanent sales or display of merchandise shall not be located in any required yard area within the lot when the lot abuts a residential zoning district; 4. The outdoor sales or display of merchandise shall not include the use of banners, pennants or strings of pennants. 61 21A.31.020: G-MU GATEWAY-MIXED USE DISTRICT: A. Purpose Statement: The G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District is intended to implement the objectives of the adopted Downtown Plan and encourage the mixture of residential, commercial and assembly uses within an urban neighborhood atmosphere. The 200 South corridor is intended to encourage commercial development on an urban scale and the 500 West corridor is intended to be a primary residential corridor from North Temple to 400 South. Development in this district is intended to create an urban neighborhood that provides employment and economic development opportunities that are oriented toward the pedestrian with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape. The standards are intended to achieve established objectives for urban and historic design, pedestrian amenities and land use regulation. B. Special Provisions: 1. Commercial Uses, 200 South: All buildings fronting 200 South shall have commercial uses that may include retail goods/service establishments, offices, restaurants, art galleries, motion picture theaters or performing arts facilities shall be provided on the first floor adjacent to the front or corner side lot line. The facades of such first floor shall be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. 2. Residential Units, 500 West: Buildings fronting on 500 West shall be required to have residential units occupying a minimum of 50% of the structure’s gross square footage. C. Building Height: The minimum building height shall be 75’ The maximum building height shall not exceed 180’. 1. Design Review: A modification to building height over ninety feet (90’) in height shall only be allowed if approved through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59 of this title, and subject to compliance to the applicable master plan. D. All buildings shall be designed with a base that is differentiated from the remainder of the building. The base shall be between one and three stories in height, be visible from pedestrian view, and appropriately scaled to the surrounding contiguous historic buildings. The base shall include fenestration that distinguishes the lower from upper floors. Insets and/or projections are encouraged. The ground floor of all new buildings shall have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 16’. E. Yard Requirements: No minimum setback requirements. A maximum setback of 10’ is allowed for up to 30% of the building facade. 62 1. If provided, the yard must include one of the following elements: a. Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every 500 square feet of yard space; or b. Landscaping that includes an increase of at least 25% in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or c. Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least 5’ in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. 2. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or midblock walkway. 3. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent public sidewalk is less than 15’ wide and the resulting modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansion, or intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less than 50% if the planning director finds the following: a. The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the original structure or the surrounding architecture, or b. The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing building. 4. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. 5. Ground floor residential uses shall have a minimum setback of 10’. This setback shall be incorporated into a private yard for the ground floor units. SECTION 7. Amending the Text of Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS: Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 63 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P P P P Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6 Bar establishment (outdoor) P6 C6 C6 P6 Brewpub (indoor) P6 P6 P6 P6 Brewpub (outdoor) P6 P6 P6 P6 Tavern (indoor) P6 C6 C6 P6 Tavern (outdoor) P6 C6 C6 P6 Animal, veterinary office P P Antenna, communication tower P P P P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C C C C Art gallery P P P P Artisan food production P14,18 P18 P18 P18 Bed and breakfast P P P P Bed and breakfast inn P P P P Bed and breakfast manor P P P P Bio-medical facility P17,18 P17,18 P17,18 P17,18 Blood donation center P Bus line station/terminal P7 P7 P7 P7 Bus line yard and repair facility P Car wash P3 Check cashing/payday loan business P5 Clinic (medical, dental) P P P P Commercial food preparation P18 P18 P18 P18 Community garden P P P P Convention center P Crematorium P P P Daycare center, adult P P P P Daycare center, child P P P P Daycare, nonregistered home daycare P12 P12 P12 P12 64 Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P12 P12 P12 P12 Dwelling: Artists’ loft/studio P P P P Assisted living facility (large) P P P P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P P Assisted living facility (small) P P P P Congregate care facility (large) C C C C Congregate care facility (small) P P P P Group home (large) C C Group home (small) P P P P Multi-family P P P P Residential support (large) C C Residential support (small) C C Exhibition hall P Farmers’ market P Financial institution P P P P Financial institution with drive- through facility P8 P8 Funeral home P P P Gas station P P7 P7 Government facility C C C C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P7 P7 Heliport, accessory C C C Home occupation P13 P13 P13 P13 Homeless resource center C15 C15 Homeless shelter C15 C15 Hotel/motel P P P P Industrial assembly C18 C18 Laboratory, medical related P18 P18 P18 P18 Laundry, commercial P18 Library P P P P Limousine service P Mixed use development P P P P 65 Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P P P P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P P Mobile food court P P P P Municipal services uses including Ccity utility uses and police and fire stations P P P P Museum P P P P Office P P P P Office, publishing company P P P P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P7 P7 P7 P7 Park P P P P Parking, commercial C19 P19 C19 C19 Parking, off site P19 P19 P19 P19 Performing arts production facility P P P P Place of worship P11 P11 P11 P11 Radio, television station P P P Railroad, passenger station P P P P Reception center P P P P Recreation (indoor) P P P P Recreation (outdoor) P Research and development facility P18 P18 P18 P18 Restaurant P P P P Restaurant with drive-through facility P8 Retail goods establishment P P P P Retail service establishment P P P P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P P Sales and display (outdoor) P P P P School: College or university P P P P K - 12 private P P K - 12 public P P Music conservatory P P P P Professional and vocational P P P P Seminary and religious institute P P P P 66 Small brewery C18 Social service mission and charity dining hall C C Stadium C C C Storage, self P16 P P Store: Department P P P Fashion oriented department P2 Mass merchandising P P P Pawnshop P Specialty P P P Superstore and hypermarket P Studio, art P P P P Technology facility P18 P18 P18 P18 Theater, live performance P9 P9 P9 P9 Theater, movie P P P P Utility, buildings or structure P1 P1 P1 P1 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P1 P1 P1 P1 Vehicle: Automobile repair (major) P P7 P7 Automobile repair (minor) P P7 P7 Automobile sales/rental and service P10 P P10 Vending cart, private property P P P P Vending cart, public property Warehouse P18 Warehouse, accessory P P Wholesale distribution P18 Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title. 2. Uses allowed only within the boundaries and subject to the provisions of the Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District (Section 21A.34.110 of this title). 67 3. A car wash located within 165 feet (including streets) of a residential use shall not be allowed. 4. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building’s footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building’s footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review (Chapter 21A.59 of this title). 5. No check cashing/payday loan business shall be located closer than 1/2 mile of other check cashing/payday loan businesses. 6. Subject to conformance with the provisions in Section 21A.36.300, “Alcohol Related Establishments”, of this title. 7. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. 8. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive- through use regulations. 9. Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district. 10. Must be located in a fully enclosed building and entirely indoors. 11. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 12. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 13. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 14. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 15. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.350 of this title. 16. Limited to basement/below ground levels only. Not allowed on the ground or upper levels of the building, with the exception of associated public leasing/office space. 17. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 18. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 19. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. SECTION 8. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.020. That Section 21A.37.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards: Applicability), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.020: APPLICABILITY: 68 The design standards identified in this chapter apply to all properties in the zoning districts listed in Section 21A.37.060 of this chapter pursuant to the following: A. Change in Use: A change in use shall be exempt from this chapter, provided that it does not result in alterations of existing design elements regulated by the standards of this chapter. B. Additions: When an addition to an existing structure is made, only the addition is subject to this chapter, provided that no existing design element regulated by these standards is altered in other portions of the existing structure. C. Repair, Maintenance or Alterations: Structures may be repaired, maintained or altered, except that no such work shall create a noncompliance or increase the degree of an existing noncompliance. If a design element of an existing structure complies with this chapter, the design element shall not be altered such that the structure becomes noncompliant. D. Certificate of Appropriateness: All new construction, additions, exterior building work, structure work, and site work on property in an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or a landmark site remains subject to a certificate of appropriateness as required in Subsection 21A.34.020.E of this title. SECTION 9. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.040. That Section 21A.37.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards: Modifications of Design Standards), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.040: MODIFICATIONS OF DESIGN STANDARDS: The planning director and/or planning commission may modify any of the design standards identified in this chapter subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59, “Design Review”, of this title. The applicant must demonstrate that the modification meets the intent for the specific design standards requested to be modified, the standards for design review and any adopted design guidelines that may apply. A. The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, Table 21A.59.040 or when authorized in the specific zoning district. 69 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, and the project is compliant with the applicable design standards (Sections 21A.37.050 and 21A.37.060). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to: a. Comply with the purpose of the base zoning district; b. Comply with the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning; c. Achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street; d. Achieve the applicable design review objectives; or e. Encourage the reuse of existing buildings when a modification to a noncomplying building results in the building becoming closer to complying with a specific design standard. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. B. For properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay District, the historic landmark commission may modify any of the design standards in this chapter as part of the review of the standards in Section 21A.34.020 of this title. SECTION 10. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.050. That Section 21A.37.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards: Design Standards Defined), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.050: DESIGN STANDARDS DEFINED: 70 The design standards in this chapter are defined as follows. Each design standard includes a specific definition of the standard and may include a graphic that is intended to help further explain the standard; however, in cases where a conflict exists between the definition and the graphic, the definition shall take precedence. The table that follows (Section 21A.37.060) highlights the connection between each design standard and the zoning districts. It identifies whether a standard is required or not. Standards that are required are identified by an X or a number referencing the applicable standard. If there is a specific detail for the standard, it will also be identified in the table. A. Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: This standard’s purpose is to increase the amount of active uses and/or visual interest on the ground floor of a building. Active uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent to a building, and encourage walk-in traffic. There are two options for achieving this, one dealing solely with the amount of ground floor use, and the other combining a lesser amount of ground floor use with increased visual interest in the building facade’s design. The majority of the ground level facade of a building shall be placed parallel, and not at an angle, to the street. 1. Ground Floor Use Only: This option requires that a portion of the length of any street-facing building façade on the ground floor of a new principal building include a permitted use, conditional use, or an amenity space within a residential building that is only available for the residents of the building. The ground floor of all new buildings shall have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 16’ and shall promote an active pedestrian environment through inclusion of active uses that capture the attention of a passer-by. Active uses include retail establishments, retail services, civic spaces (theaters, museums, etc), restaurants, bars, art and craft studios, and other uses determined to be substantially similar by the planning director and/or planning commission. For buildings that are entirely residential, active uses may include ground floor residential units. The ground floor use shall not consist of spaces that discourage walk-in traffic, such as a residential mailroom, common room, back of house functions, or private business offices associated with an active use. Allowed uses shall occupy a minimum percentage of the length of the street facing facade according to Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. All portions of such ground floor spaces shall extend a minimum of 25’ into the building. Parking may be located behind these spaces. a. For single-family attached uses, the required use depth may be reduced to ten feet (10’). b. The TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-UN3 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban 71 Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16’ minimum floor to ceiling height. c. For single-family or two-family uses, garages occupying up to 50% of the length of the ground floor building facade are exempt from this requirement. d. For all other uses, vehicle entry and exit ways necessary for access to parking are exempt from this requirement. Such accessways shall not exceed 30’ in width. Individual dwelling unit garages do not qualify for this exemption. e. Amenity space is defined as a portion of the public right of way adjacent to the sidewalk, outside of the pedestrian walking area, which can include streetscape elements, street furniture, landscaping, outdoor dining areas, and/or trees. It shall only be counted for up to 25% of the length of the building façade. For corner properties, each street facing building façade shall be allowed to have up to 25% of the required ground floor to include amenity space. This is applicable in districts where there are no front or side yard setback requirements. Amenity spaces are subject to any necessary encroachment agreements that may be required. f. Areas such as kitchens, storage, bicycle parking, and other areas that are not accessible to customers shall not be counted towards the requirement for ground floor use and visual interest. 2. Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: This option allows for some flexibility in the amount of required ground floor use, but in return requires additional design requirements for the purpose of creating increased visual interest and pedestrian activity where the lower levels of buildings face streets or sidewalks. This option identifies a required percentage of ground floor space that must be an active use, and the percentage of the building which must provide visual interest. An applicant utilizing this option must proceed through the design review process, Chapter 21A.59), for review of the project for determination of the project’s compliance with those standards, and in addition, whether the design contributes to increased visual interest through a combination of increased building material variety, architectural features, facade changes, art, and colors; and, increased pedestrian activity through permeability between the building and the adjacent public realm using niches, bays, gateways, porches, colonnades, stairs or other similar features to facilitate pedestrian interaction with the building. \ 72 B. Building Materials: 1. All buildings which have been altered over 75% on the exterior facade shall comply with the material requirements detailed below. Buildings older than 50 years are exempt from this requirement if alterations are consistent with the existing architecture. 2. For the purpose of the requirements below, a durable material is defined as any material that has a manufacturer’s warranty of a minimum of 20 years or is a natural material such as stone or wood provided the wood is treated and maintained for exterior use. 3. Ground Floor Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, a minimum amount of the ground floor facade’s wall area of any street facing facade shall be clad in durable materials according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Durable materials include stone, brick, masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials may be used for the remainder of the ground floor facade adjacent to a street. Other materials proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is appropriate for the ground floor of a structure. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.A.2 Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest 1 Contribute to increased visual interest through a combination of increased building material variety, architectural features, facade changes, art, and colors. 2 Contribute to increased pedestrian activity through a clear visual relationship between the building and the adjacent public realm using niches, bays, gateways, porches, colonnades, stairs or other similar features. 73 4. Upper Floor Building Materials: Floors above the ground floor level shall include durable materials on a minimum amount of any street facing building facade of those additional floors according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Windows and doors are not included in that minimum amount. Durable materials include stone, brick, masonry, textured or patterned concrete, and fiber cement board or other material that includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. C. Glass: 1. Ground Floor Glass: The ground floor building elevation of all new buildings facing a street, and all new ground floor additions facing a street, shall have a minimum percentage of glass, as calculated between three feet and eight feet above grade according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. All ground floor glass shall allow unhampered and unobstructed visibility into the building for a depth of at least five feet, excluding any glass etching and window signs when installed and permitted in accordance with Chapter 21A.46, “Signs”, of this title. The planning director may approve a modification to ground floor glass requirements if the planning director finds: a. The requirement would negatively affect the historic character of an existing building; b. The requirement would negatively affect the structural stability of an existing building; or c. The ground level of the building is occupied by residential uses that face the street, in which case the specified minimum glass requirement may be reduced by 15%. 74 2. Upper Floor Glass: Above the first floor of any multi-story building, the surface area of the facade of each floor facing a street must contain a minimum percentage of glass according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. a. Reflective Glass: The maximum percentage of reflective glass, defined as glass with a coating that creates a mirror-like appearance, is allowed according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter, on both the ground floor and upper floor of buildings. D. Building Entrances: A building entrance is defined as an entrance to a building that includes a door and entry feature such as a recess or canopy that provides customers with direct access to the use. For the purpose of this provision, an operable building entrance shall be open and accessible during the hours that the business is open and comply with applicable ADA standards. At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is required for every street facing facade. Additional operable building entrances shall be required, at a minimum, at each specified length of street facing building facade according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. The center of each additional entrance shall be located within six feet either direction of the specified location. Each ground floor nonresidential leasable space facing a street shall have an Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.C.1 Ground Floor Glass (References the measurements in Table D, D-1) 1 The ground floor building elevation of all new buildings facing a street, and all new ground floor additions facing a street, shall have a minimum percentage of glass as indicated in the associated tables in this chapter, between three feet and eight feet above grade. 75% 75 operable entrance facing that street and a walkway to the nearest sidewalk. Corner entrances, when facing a street and located at approximately a 45° angle to the two adjacent building facades (chamfered corner), may count as an entrance for both of the adjacent facades. E. Maximum Length of Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall uninterrupted by windows, doors, art or architectural detailing at the ground floor level along any street facing facade shall be as specified according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Changes in plane, texture, materials, scale of materials, patterns, art, or other architectural detailing are acceptable methods to create variety and scale. This shall include architectural features such as bay windows, recessed or projected entrances, windows, balconies, cornices, columns, or other similar architectural features. The architectural feature shall be either recessed a minimum of 12” or projected a minimum of 12”. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.D Building Entrances (References the measurements in Table D, D-1) 1 At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is required for every street facing facade. Additional operable building entrances shall be required, at a minimum distance as indicated in the associated tables in this chapter. 76 F. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: This requirement sets the maximum length of a single street facing façade of a structure. The purpose of this is to have building massing that better responds to human scale to create a walkable pedestrian environment. No street facing building wall may be longer than specified along a street line according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. A minimum of 20’ is required between separate buildings when multiple buildings are placed on a single parcel according to Subsection 21A.36.010.B, “One Principal Building Per Lot”, of this title. The space between buildings shall include a pedestrian walkway at least five feet wide. G. Upper Floor Stepback: 1. The upper floor stepback for street facing facades is dependent on the height of the building according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. For buildings that are between 78’ to 104’, or between 6 and 8 stories, a minimum stepback of 10’ is required at least 25’ above grade. For buildings above 105’, or 8 stories, the step back shall be a minimum of 15’ from the property line. The stepback Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.E Maximum Length of Blank Wall (References the measurements in Table D, Downtown Districts) 1 The maximum length of any blank wall uninterrupted by windows, doors, art or architectural detailing at the ground floor level along any street facing façade shall be limited to the specified measurement indicated in the associated table in this chapter. 2 The architectural feature shall be either recessed a minimum of 12” or projected a minimum of 12”. 77 shall appear after the first two to five floors. In addition to these provisions, 20% of the entire building façade can meet the street at the lot line with no stepback. An alternative to this street facing facade stepback requirement may be utilized for buildings limited to 45’ or less in height by the zoning ordinance: those buildings may provide a 4’ minimum depth canopy, roof structure, or balcony that extends from the face of the building toward the street at a height of between 12’ and 15’ above the adjacent sidewalk. Such extension(s) shall extend horizontally parallel to the street for a minimum of 50% of the face of the building and may encroach into a setback as permitted per Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B, “Obstructions in Required Yards”, of this title. 2. Stepbacks are required for full floors above the height, according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter, measured from average finished grade that have facades facing single- or two-family residential districts with a permitted height that is 35’ or less, a public trail or public open space. The purpose of this Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.G1 Upper Floor Stepback 1 For buildings that are between 78’ to 104’, or between 6 and 8 stories, a minimum stepback of 10’ is required at least 25’ above grade. The stepback shall appear after the first 26’ to 65’, or 2 to 5 floors. In addition to these provisions, 20% of the entire building façade can meet the street at the lot line with no stepback. 2 For buildings above 104’, or 8 stories, the stepback shall be a minimum of 15’ from the property line. The stepback shall appear after the first 26’ to 65’, or 2 to 5 floors. In addition to these provisions, 20% of the entire building façade can meet the street at the lot line with no stepback. 78 provision is to reduce the impact that buildings over a certain height have on abutting properties when the abutting properties have a permitted height that is 35’ or less. 3. For street facing facades the first full floor, and all additional floors, above thirty feet (30’) in height from average finished grade shall be stepped back a minimum horizontal distance from the front line of building, according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. An alternative to this street facing facade step back requirement may be utilized for buildings limited to forty five feet (45’) or less in height by the zoning ordinance: those buildings may provide a four foot (4’) minimum depth canopy, roof structure, or balcony that extends from the face of the building toward the street at a height of between twelve feet (12’) and fifteen feet (15’) above the adjacent sidewalk. Such extension(s) shall extend horizontally parallel to the street for a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the face of the building and may encroach into a setback as permitted per Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B, “Obstructions in Required Yards”, of this title. 4. Floors rising above thirty feet (30’) in height shall be stepped back fifteen (15) horizontal feet from the building foundation at grade for building elevations that are adjacent to a public street, public trail, or public open space. This stepback does not apply to buildings that have balconies on floors rising above thirty feet (30’) in height. H. Exterior Lighting: All exterior lighting shall be shielded and directed down to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. Exterior lighting shall not strobe, flash or flicker. I. Parking Lot Lighting: If a parking lot/structure is adjacent to a residential zoning district or land use, any poles for the parking lot/structure security lighting are limited to 16’ in height and the globe must be shielded and the lighting directed down to minimize light encroachment onto adjacent residential properties or into upper level residential units in multi-story buildings. Lightproof fencing is required adjacent to residential properties. J. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment for a building shall be screened from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of such impact-minimizing siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020.B, “Obstructions in Required Yards”, of this title. K. Screening of Service Areas: Service areas, loading docks, refuse containers, utility meters, and similar areas shall be fully screened from public view. All screening enclosures viewable from the street shall be either incorporated into the building architecture or shall incorporate building materials and detailing compatible with the building being served. Waste and loading facilities are prohibited from being located on street-facing facades and shall be co-located and screened when possible. Exceptions to 79 this requirement may be approved by the planning director when the service provides power or some form of utilities in and around the surrounding area. Exemptions may also be approved through the site plan review process when a permit applicant demonstrates that it is not feasible to accommodate these activities on the block interior. If such activities are permitted adjacent to a public street, a visual screening design approved by the planning director shall be required. All screening devices shall be a minimum of one foot higher than the object being screened, and in the case of fences and/or masonry walls the height shall not exceed eight feet. Dumpsters must be located a minimum of 25’ from any building on an adjacent lot that contains a residential dwelling or be located inside of an enclosed building or structure. L. Ground Floor Residential Entrances for Dwellings with Individual Unit Entries: For the zoning districts listed in Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter, all attached dwellings including attached single-family dwellings, townhomes, row houses, multi-family developments with ground floor uses, and other similar housing types located on the ground floor shall have a primary entrance facing the street for each unit adjacent to a street. Units may have a primary entrance located on a courtyard, midblock walkway, or other similar area if the street facing facades also have a primary entrance. M. Parking Garages or Structures: The following standards shall apply to parking garages or structures whether stand alone or incorporated into a building: 1. Parking structures shall have an external skin designed to improve visual character when adjacent to a public street or other public space. Examples include heavy gauge metal screen, precast concrete panels; live green or landscaped walls, laminated or safety glass, decorative photovoltaic panels or match the building materials and character of the principal use. The planning director may approve other decorative materials not listed if the materials are in keeping with the decorative nature of the parking structure. 2. Facade elements shall align to parking levels and there shall be no sloped surfaces visible from a public street, public trail or public open space. 3. Internal circulation must be designed such that parking surfaces are level (or without any slopes) along all primary facades. All ramping between levels need to be placed along the secondary facade or to the center of the structure. Parking structures shall be designed to conceal the view of all parked cars and drive ramps from public spaces. 4. Elevator and stairs shall be highlighted architecturally so visitors can easily access these entry points both internally and externally. 80 5. Signage and wayfinding shall be integrated with the architecture of the parking structure and be architecturally compatible with the design. The entrances of public parking structures shall be clearly signed from public streets. 6. Interior garage lighting shall not produce glaring sources toward adjacent properties while providing safe and adequate lighting levels. The use of sensor dimmable LEDs and white stained ceilings are a good strategy to control light levels on site while improving energy efficiency. 7. Where a driveway crosses a public sidewalk, the driveway shall be a different color, texture, or paving material than the sidewalk to warn drivers of the possibility of pedestrians in the area. 8. The ground floor of all parking structures shall be wrapped along all street frontages with habitable space that is occupied by a use that is allowed in the zone as a permitted or conditional use. 9. Parking structures shall be designed to minimize vehicle noise and odors on the public realm. Venting and fan locations shall not be located next to public spaces and shall be located as far as possible from adjacent residential land uses. 10. If the parking structure is adjacent to a midblock walkway, pedestrian oriented elements shall be provided. These may include, but are not limited to seating and vegetation. N. Residential Character in RB District: 1. All roofs shall be pitched and of a hip or gable design except additions or expansions to existing buildings may be of the same roof design as the original building; 2. The remodeling of residential buildings for retail or office use shall be allowed only if the residential character of the exterior is maintained; 3. The front building elevation shall contain not more than 50% glass; 4. Signs shall conform with special sign regulations of Chapter 21A.46, “Signs”, of this title; 5. Building orientation shall be to the front or corner side yard; and 6. Building additions shall consist of materials, color and exterior building design consistent with the existing structure, unless the entire structure is resurfaced. O. Primary Entrance Design in SNB District: Primary entrance design shall consist of at least two of the following design elements at the primary entrance, so that the primary entrance is architecturally prominent and clearly visible from the abutting street. 1. Architectural details such as arches, friezes, tile work, canopies, or awnings. 2. Integral planters or wing walls that incorporate landscape or seating. 3. Enhanced exterior light fixtures such as wall sconces, light coves with concealed light sources, or decorative pedestal lights. 81 4. A repeating pattern of pilasters projecting from the facade wall by a minimum of eight inches or architectural or decorative columns. 5. Recessed entrances that include a minimum stepback of two feet from the primary facade and that include glass on the sidewalls. P. Streetscape Standards: These standards are required for landscaping that is within the public right of way. This is defined as the space between the private property line and the back of the curb. 1. Tree Canopy Coverage: No tree canopy shall cover less than the specified percentage according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. The defined percentage represents the canopy coverage at maturity. At installation, a minimum of 20% of all trees shall have a minimum caliper of 3”. 2. Minimum Vegetation Standards: The percentage of vegetation shall be no less than the specified amount according to Chapter 21A.48. The vegetation shall be planted in the public right of way. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.1 Tree Canopy Coverage 1 No tree canopy coverage shall cover less than the specified percentage according to Section 21A.37.060, Table 21A.37.060 of this chapter. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.2 Minimum Vegetation Standards (References the measurements in Table D, Downtown Districts) 82 3. Street Trees: Street trees are required and subject to the regulations in Section 21A.48.080. In addition to those standards, for every new development, there shall be one street tree planted for every 30’ of street frontage. 4. Soil Volume: In order to promote street tree health and longevity, each tree shall have an adequate volume of soil. The soil volume surrounding a tree shall be 750ft3 to 1,000ft3 per tree, provided that this area is exclusive of the soils volume calculation for adjacent trees. The soil volume may be reduced if under ground utilities are present within the soil volume and the soil volume cannot be extended horizontally due to other obstructions or barriers. 1 The percentage of vegetation shall be no less than the specified percentage according to Chapter 21A.48. 2 Vegetation shall be planted in the public right of way. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.4 Soil Volume 1 The soil volume surrounding a tree shall be 750ft3 to 1,000ft3 per tree, provided that this area is exclusive of the soils volume calculation for adjacent trees. 83 5. Minimize Curb Cuts: As an effort to emphasize the public realm and encourage the safety of pedestrians, places where cars intersect the street shall be minimized. More specifically, curb cuts are encouraged to be concentrated at midblock and alley locations. The sidewalk material shall continue at ground level of the curb cuts. 6. Overhead Cover: Overhead covers are required at building entrances to provide weather protection to pedestrians and may encroach into a required yard as indicated in this section or into a public right of way with an approved encroachment agreement with the City. These coverings are required to be between 9 and 14’ above the level of the sidewalk. They shall also provide coverage with a minimum depth of 6’ and project no closer to the curb than 3’. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.5 Minimize Curb Cuts 1 Curb cuts are encouraged to be concentrated at midblock and alley locations. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.P.6 Overhead Cover 84 7. Streetscape Landscaping: All vegetation used along the streetscape must comply with the landscape requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.48. Q. Height Transitions: This measurement is applied to control the size and shape of the building envelope or portion thereof for such purposes as promoting transition in scale between buildings of different height, protecting access to sunlight, and/or limiting shadow and overlook on neighboring properties. A transition may be achieved by relating a building’s form to those that surround it through the following way. An angular plane of 45°, measured from the relevant property lines, should be used to provide a frame of reference for transition in scale from proposed high-rise buildings down to lower scale areas. The transition is required when development is directly adjacent to a zone with a height maximum of 35’ or less or adjacent to a local historic landmark site. These standards do not apply when a right of way separates the buildings. 1 The shade structure shall occur between 9 and 14’ above the level of the sidewalk. The shade shall provide a minimum coverage of 6’ in width. The cover shall project no closer than 3’ to the curb. Illustration of Regulation 21A.37.050.Q Height Transitions 85 R. Horizontal articulation: Buildings shall be designed in such a way that they are appropriately scaled to the pedestrian at the street level. This scale is emphasized through authentic breaks in the façade. These breaks shall be articulated on the primary façade to the full height of the building to the cornice or to the full height of the building to the first horizontal setback. There may be a maximum spacing of 60’ for horizontal articulation. Horizontal articulation shall be achieved through one of the following architectural features: a. Bay windows: Bay windows shall be a minimum of two feet in depth and four feet in width; or b. Recessed entrances or windows: These shall be recessed a minimum of four feet in depth and six feet in width. Canopies or awnings are required at primary building entries; or c. Niches: Niches shall be a minimum of two feet in depth and four feet in width; or d. Openings for gates that are a minimum of four feet in width; or e. Porches measuring at least 48 square feet; or f. Colonnades that are a minimum of four feet in width. 1 An angular plane of 45°, measured from the relevant property lines, should be used to provide a frame of reference for transition in scale from proposed high-rise buildings down to lower scale areas. The transition is required when development is adjacent to a zone with a height maximum of 35’ or less or adjacent to a local historic landmark site. 86 SECTION 11. Amending the Text of Section 21A.37.060. That Section 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.37.060: DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRED IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT: This section identifies each design standard and to which zoning districts the standard applies. If a box is checked (X), that standard is required. If a box is blank, it is not required. If a specific dimension or detail of a design standard differs among zoning districts or differs from the definition, it will be indicated within the box. In cases where a dimension in this table conflicts with a dimension in the definition, the dimensions listed in the table shall take precedence. 87 TABLE 21A.37.060 A. Residential Districts: Standard (Code Section) District RMF-3 0 RMF-3 5 RMF-4 5 RMF-7 5 RB R-MU-35 R-MU-45 R-M U RO Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 75 75 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050B.3) 80 80 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 60 60 40 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 75 75 X Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 15 15 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G) 10 Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X X X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X X X Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) 88 Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) Residential character in RB District (21A.37.050.N) X B. Commercial Districts: Standard (Code Section) District SNB CN CB CS CC CSHB D CG1 TSA Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 80 802 80 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) 60/25 70/20 60/25 Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 80 70 90 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 60 60 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 40 40 40 40 60 60 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 25 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 40 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) X X X X X 40 40 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 15 15 15 15 20 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 200 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.3) 15 X Façade height for required stepback (21A.37.050.G.2) 30 Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X X X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X X X X X X X X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X X X X X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K) X X X X X X 89 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Primary entrance design SNB District (21A.37.050.O) X Tree canopy coverage (%)(21A.37.050.P.1) 40 Minimum vegetation standards (%) (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) X Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent buildings (21A.37.050.Q) Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) X Notes: 1. These standards only apply to the portion of the CG district within the boundaries of north of 900 S, south of 200 S, west 300 W and east of I-15. 2. Maximum width of the entrance shall be 35’ if the additional 20% is used for an entrance to a parking structure. 90 C. Manufacturing Districts: Standard (Code Section) District M-1 M-2 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.1) Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.2) Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) 91 Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K) Ground floor residential entrances (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) D. Downtown Districts: Standard (Code Section) District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 90 80 80 80 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) 80/10 70/20 70/20 70/20 Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.1) 70 80 701 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.2) 50 50 701 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 60 60 60 60 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 50 50 50 50 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 0 0 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 50 50 50 50 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 40 60 60 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 20 20 20 20 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 150 200 150 150 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.1) X X X X Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X X 92 Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X X X X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K) X X X X Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X2 X2 Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 40 40 40 40 Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X X X X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X X X X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) X X X X Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X X X X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X X X X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X X X X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X X X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) X X X X Notes: 1. In the D-3 zoning district this percentage applies to all sides of the building, not just the front or street facing facade. 2. Parking structures shall be located behind principal buildings. This requirement may be modified so that structures may be located at least 15’ from front and corner side lot lines if a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the ground floor adjacent to a sidewalk is used for retail goods/service establishments, office and/or restaurant space to encourage pedestrian activity. The facades of the ground floor shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. 93 E. Gateway Districts: Standard (Code Section) District G-MU Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 80 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) 70/20 Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.1) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.2) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 60 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 50 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 50 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 150 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.1) X Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X1 Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X1 Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K) X Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) 94 Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X2 Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 40 Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) X Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) X Notes: 1. Sidewalks and street lamps installed in the public right-of- way shall be of the type specified in the sidewalk/street lighting policy document adopted by the city. 2. Parking structures shall be located behind principal buildings. This requirement may be modified so that structures may be located at least 15’ from front and corner side lot lines if a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the ground floor adjacent to a sidewalk is used for retail goods/service establishments, office and/or restaurant space to encourage pedestrian activity. The facades of the ground floor shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. 95 F. Special Purpose Districts: Standard (Code Section) District RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 PL PL-2 I UI OS NOS MH EI MU Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.1) Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.2) Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 40-70 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) X Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 96 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X X X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K) X Ground floor residential entrances (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) Soil Volume (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) 97 Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 98 G. Form Based Districts: Standard (Code Section) District FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-UN3 FB-SC FB-SE Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 75 753 75 75 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 70 70 70 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 70 70 70 70 70 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 601 601 601 601 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 15 15 15 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 75 75 75 75 75 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 15 15 30 30 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 200 200 200 200 Upper floor step back (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) X X X X Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X X X X X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X X X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X X X 99 Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X X X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X X X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X X X X X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 40 40 40 Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X X X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X X X X X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) X X X Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X X X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X X X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X X X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) X X X Notes: 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house. 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. 100 SECTION 12. Amending the Text of Section 21A.44.060. That Section 21A.44.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.44.060: PARKING LOCATION AND DESIGN: All required parking areas shall be located and designed in accordance with the standards in this Chapter 21A.44: Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading and the standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. Modifications to the standards of this Section 21A.44.060 may be granted through the design review process, subject to conformance with the standards and procedures of Chapter 21A.59: Design Review. A. Generally: 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this ordinance shall be located on the same lot as the building or use served, unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, “Off-Site Parking Permitted”. 2. Biodetention and Landscape Islands in General and Neighborhood Center Contexts: For parking lots with one hundred (100) or more parking spaces in the General Context and Neighborhood Center Context areas, parking lot islands or biodetention areas shall be provided on the interior of the parking lot to help direct traffic flow and to provide landscaped areas within such lots. 3. Parking Location and Setbacks: All parking shall comply with the parking restrictions within yards pursuant to Table 21A.44.060-A, “Parking Location and Setback Requirements“. TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, 0 ft. 101 SR-2 from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF- 45, RMF-75, RO 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single- family attached lots. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070.I M-1 15 ft. M-2 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG- 5, AG-20 N BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. 102 FP 20 ft. 6 ft. 0 ft. I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 30 ft. 10 ft. PL 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district PL-2 20 ft. RP 30 ft. 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB , CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45’ or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 0 ft. 103 21A.30.010.F Parking Structures: N MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-3 D-4 See Subsections 21A.44.060.B.1, 21A.30.010.F and 21A.31.010.H 0 ft. G-MU FB-UN2, FB- UN3, FB-SC N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 104 4. Off-Site Parking Permitted: When allowed as either a permitted or conditional use per Chapter 21A.33, “Land Use Tables”, off-site parking facilities may be used to satisfy the requirements of this chapter and shall comply with the following standards: a. Maximum Distance of Off-Site Parking: Off-site parking shall be located according to the distance established in Table 21A.44.060-B, “Maximum Distances for Off-Site Parking“ (measured in a straight line from the property boundary of the principal use for which the parking serves to the closest point of the parking area). Table 21A.44.060-B: Maximum Distances for Off-Site Parking: Context Maximum Distance to Off-Site Parking Neighborhood Center 600 ft. General Legal Nonconforming Use in Residential District Urban Center 1,200 ft. Transit 1,000 ft. b. Documentation Required: (1) The owners of record involved in an off-site parking arrangement shall submit written documentation of the continued availability of the off-site parking arrangement to the planning director for review. (2) The planning director shall approve the off-site parking arrangement if the director determines the location meets the standards of this section. No zoning or use approval shall be issued until the director has approved the off-site parking arrangement and the documentation has been recorded in the office of the Salt Lake County Recorder. (3) If the off-site parking arrangement is later terminated or modified and the planning director determines that the termination or modification has resulted in traffic congestion, overflow parking in residential neighborhoods, or threats to pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle safety, the property owners of the uses for which the off-site parking was provided may be held in violation of this chapter. 105 5. Circulation Plan Required: Any application for a building permit shall include a site plan, drawn to scale, and fully dimensioned, showing any off street parking or loading facilities to be provided in compliance with this title. A tabulation of the number of off street vehicle and bicycle parking, loading, and stacking spaces required by this chapter shall appear in a conspicuous place on the plan. 6. Driveways and Access: a. Compliance with Other Adopted Regulations: (1) Parking lots shall be designed in compliance with applicable city codes, ordinances, and standards, including but not limited to Title 12 of this code: Vehicles and Traffic and the Off Street Parking Standards Manual to the maximum degree practicable, with respect to: (a) Minimum distances between curb cuts; (b) Proximity of curb cuts to intersections; (c) Provisions for shared driveways; (d) Location, quantity and design of landscaped islands; and (e) Design of parking lot interior circulation system. (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.6.a(1) above, relocation of a driveway for a single-family, two-family, or twin home residence in any zoning district shall only be required when the residence is replaced, and shall not be required when the residence is expanded or renovated in compliance with the city code. b. Access Standards: Access to all parking facilities shall comply with the following standards: (1) To the maximum extent practicable, all off street parking facilities shall be designed with vehicular access to a street or alley that will least interfere with automobile, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic movement. (2) Parking facilities in excess of five (5) spaces that access a public street shall be designed to allow vehicles to enter and exit the lot in a forward direction. (3) Parking facilities on lots with less than one hundred feet (100’) of street frontage shall have only one curb cut, and lots with one hundred feet (100’) of street frontage or more shall be limited to two curb cuts, unless the transportation director determines that additional curb cuts are necessary to ensure pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle safety or to comply with the fire code. 106 Public safety uses shall be exempt from limitations on curb cuts. (4) All vehicular access roads/driveways shall be surfaced as required in accordance with Subsection 21A.44.060.A.8, “Surface Materials”. c. Driveway Standards: All driveways shall comply with the following standards: (1) Driveway Location in Residential Zoning Districts: With the exception of legal shared driveways, driveways shall be at least twenty feet (20’) from street corner property lines and five feet (5’) from any public utility infrastructure such as power poles, fire hydrants, and water meters. Except for entrance and exit driveways leading to approved parking areas, no curb cuts or driveways are permitted. (2) Driveway Widths: All driveways serving residential uses shall be a minimum eight feet wide and shall comply with the standards for maximum driveway widths listed in Table 21A.44.060-C, “Minimum and Maximum Driveway Width“. TABLE 21A.44.060-C: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY WIDTH: Zoning District Minimum Driveway Width (in front and corner side yard) Maximum Driveway Width* (in front and corner side yard) SR-1, SR-2 and SR-3 8 ft. 22 ft. MH 8 ft. 16 ft. Other Residential Zoning Districts 8 ft. 30 ft. M-1 and M-2 12 ft. single lane and 24 ft. for two-way 50 ft. Other Non-Residential Zoning Districts 12 ft. single lane and 24 ft. for two-way 30 ft. * Maximum width is for all driveways combined when more than one driveway is provided (3) Shared Driveways: Shared driveways, where two or more properties share one driveway access, may be permitted if the transportation director determines that the design and location of the shared driveway access will not create adverse impacts on traffic congestion or public safety. 107 (4) Driveway Surface: All driveways providing access to parking facilities shall be improved and maintained pursuant to the standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 7. Minimum Dimensional Standards: All parking spaces shall comply with the dimensional standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 8. Surface Materials: All parking spaces shall comply with the standards for surfacing of access, driving, and parking surfacing in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 9. Grading and Stormwater Management: All surface parking areas shall comply with city grading and stormwater management standards and shall be reviewed for best management practices by Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. Refer to the Salt Lake City Stormwater Master Plan, Storm Drainage Manual, and Green Infrastructure Toolbox for additional information. 10. Sight Distance Triangles: All driveways and intersections shall comply with the sight distance triangle standards as defined in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. 11. Landscaping and Screening: All parking areas and facilities shall comply with the landscaping and screening standards in Chapter 21A.48, “Landscaping and Buffers”. 12. Lighting: Where a parking area or parking lot is illuminated, the light source shall be shielded so that the light source is not directly visible from any abutting property or abutting private or public street. 13. Signs: All signs in parking areas or related to parking facilities shall comply with Chapter 21A.46, “Signs”, and applicable provisions of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). 14. Pedestrian Walkways: a. Surface parking lots with between twenty-five (25) and one hundred (100) parking spaces shall provide a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk through the parking lot to the primary entrance of the principal building. Pedestrian walkways shall be identified by a change in color, material, surface texture, or grade elevation from surrounding driving surfaces. b. Parking lots with more than one hundred (100) parking spaces shall provide: (1) One or more grade-separated pedestrian walkway(s), at least five feet (5’) in width, and located in an area that is not a driving surface, leading from the farthest row of parking spaces to the primary entrance of the principal building. 108 (2) Vehicles shall not overhang the pedestrian walkway(s). (3) Where the walkway(s) crosses a drive aisle, pedestrian walkway(s) shall be identified by a change in color, material, surface texture, or grade elevation from surrounding driving surfaces. (4) One pedestrian walkway meeting these standards shall be provided for each one hundred (100) parking spaces provided on site or part thereof, after the first one hundred (100) parking spaces. 15. Parking Garages: The following standards shall apply to all above-ground parking garages except those located in the FB zones subject to Subsection 21A.27.030.C.4, whether freestanding or incorporated into a building: a. Each façade or a parking garage adjacent to a public street or public space shall have an external skin designed to conceal the view of all parked cars. Examples include heavy gauge metal screen, precast concrete panels, live green or landscaped walls, laminated or safety glass, or decorative photovoltaic panels. b. No horizontal length of the parking garage façade shall extend longer than 40 feet without the inclusion of architectural elements such as decorative grillwork, louvers, translucent screens, alternating building materials, and other external features to avoid visual monotony. Facade elements shall align with parking levels. c. Internal circulation shall allow parking surfaces to be level (without any slope) along each parking garage facade adjacent to a public street or public space. All ramps between levels shall be located along building facades that are not adjacent to a public street or public space, or shall be located internally so that they are not visible from adjacent public streets or public spaces. d. The location of elevators and stairs shall be highlighted through the use of architectural features or changes in façade colors, textures, or materials so that visitors can easily identify these entry points. e. Interior parking garage lighting shall not produce glaring sources toward adjacent properties while providing safe and adequate lighting levels. The use of sensor dimmable LEDs and white stained ceilings are recommended to control light levels on-site while improving energy efficiency. f. In the Urban Center Context and Transit Context areas, the street-level facades of all parking garages shall be designed to meet applicable building code standards for habitable space to allow at least one permitted or conditional use, other than parking, to be located where the parking garage is located. 109 g. Vent and fan locations shall not be located on parking garage facades facing public streets or public spaces, or adjacent to residential uses, to the greatest extent practicable. 16. Tandem Parking: Where more than one parking space is required to be provided for a residential dwelling unit, the parking spaces may be designed as tandem parking spaces, provided that: a. No more than two required spaces may be included in the tandem parking layout; and b. Each set of two tandem parking spaces shall be designated for a specific residential unit. 17. Cross-Access Between Adjacent Uses: The transportation director may require that access to one or more lots be through shared access points or cross-access through adjacent parcels when the transportation director determines that individual access to abutting parcels or limited distance between access points will create traffic safety hazards due to traffic levels on adjacent streets or nearby intersections. Such a determination shall be consistent with requirements of state law regarding property access from public streets. Required cross- access agreements shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office. B. Zone Specific Location and Design Standards: 1. D-1, D-3, D-4, and G-MU Zoning Districts: The following regulations shall apply to surface or above-ground parking facilities. No special design and setback restrictions shall apply to below-ground parking facilities. a. Above-ground parking facilities located within the block corner areas and on Main Street, shall be located behind principal buildings and: (1) All above-ground parking facilities that front a street shall contain uses other than parking along the entire length of the building façade and along all stories or levels of the building. (2) Vehicle access to parking shall be located to the side of the building or as far from the street corner as possible unless further restricted by this title. b. Parking garages shall meet the following: (1) Retail goods/service establishments, offices and/or restaurants shall be provided on the first floor adjacent to the front or corner side lot line. The facades of such first floors shall be compatible and consistent with the associated retail or office portion of the building and other retail uses in the area. (2) Levels of parking above the first level facing the front or corner side lot line 110 shall have floors and/or facades that are horizontal, not sloped. (3) Landscape Requirements: Surface parking lots, where allowed shall have a minimum landscaped setback of fifteen feet (15’) and shall meet interior parking lot landscaping requirements as outlined in Chapter 21A.48, “Landscaping and Buffers”. 2. TSA Transit Station Area District: New uses and development or redevelopment within the TSA Transit Station Area District shall comply with the following standards. a. Surface Parking on Corner Properties: On corner properties, surface parking lots shall be located behind principal buildings or at least sixty feet (60’) from the intersection of the front and corner side lot lines. b. Surface Parking in the Core Area: Surface parking lots in the core area are required to be located behind or to the side of the principal building. (1) When located to the side of a building, the parking lot shall be: (a) Set back a minimum of thirty feet (30’) from a property line adjacent to a public street. The area between the parking lot and the property line adjacent to a public street shall be landscaped or activated with outdoor dining, plazas, or similar features; (b) Screened with a landscaped hedge or wall that is at least thirty-six inches (36”) above grade and no taller than forty-two inches (42”) above grade. Landscaping berms are not permitted; and (c) No wider than what is required for two rows of parking and one drive aisle as provided in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual. (2) Unless a second driveway is necessary to comply with the fire code, a maximum of one driveway and drive aisle shall be permitted per street frontage. The access point shall be located a minimum of one hundred feet (100’) from the intersection of the front and corner side lot lines. If the front or corner side lot line is less than one hundred feet (100’) in length, then the edge of the drive approach shall be located within twenty feet (20’) of the side or rear property line. c. Surface Parking in the Transition Area: (1) Surface parking lots in the transition area are required to be located behind the principal building or to the side of a principal building. (2) When located to the side of a principal building, the parking lot shall be: 111 (a) Set back so that no portion of the parking area (other than the driveway) shall be closer to the street than the front wall setback of the building. In cases where the front wall of the building is located within five feet (5’) of a property line adjacent to a street, the parking lot shall be set back a minimum of eight feet (8’). The space between the parking lot and the property line adjacent to a street shall be landscaped or activated with outdoor dining, plazas, or similar features; and (b) Screened with a landscaped hedge or wall that is at least thirty-six inches (36”) above grade and no taller than forty-two inches (42”) above grade. Landscaped berms are not permitted. d. Off street parking for police services are exempt from landscape setback dimensions when off street parking is necessary for a police substation located in an existing building. This exemption permits parking for emergency vehicles when the landscape setback also fulfills any requirement for open space area on the property. The extent of the exemption shall be the minimum necessary to accommodate the necessary parking. If the police substation use vacates the space, the landscaping that was removed, if any, shall be restored in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations in place at the time the use ceases. C. Recreational Vehicle Parking: 1. Generally: a. Recreational vehicle parking spaces shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, required off street vehicle parking spaces. b. Recreational vehicles shall not be used for storage of goods, materials, or equipment other than those that are customarily associated with the recreational vehicle. c. All recreational vehicles shall be stored in a safe and secure manner. Any tie downs, tarpaulins, or ropes shall be secured from flapping in windy conditions. d. Recreational vehicles shall not be occupied as a dwelling while parked on the property. e. Recreational vehicle parking is permitted in any enclosed structure conforming to building code and zoning requirements for the zoning district in which it is located. f. Recreational vehicle parking outside of an approved enclosed structure shall be permitted for each residence and shall be limited to one motor home or travel trailer and a total of two recreational vehicles of any type. 112 g. Recreational vehicle parking outside of an enclosed structure shall comply with the standards in this section. 2. Front Yard Parking: Recreational vehicle parking is prohibited in any required or provided front yard. 3. Rear Yard Parking: Recreational vehicles may be parked in the rear yard when they are on a hard surfaced pad compliant with surfacing standards in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual and with access provided by either a hard surfaced driveway, hard surfaced drive strips or an access drive constructed of turf block materials with an irrigation system. 4. Side Yard Parking: Recreational vehicle parking in side yards shall be allowed only when topographical factors, the existence of mature trees, or the existence of properly permitted and constructed structures prohibit access to the rear yard. The existence of a fence or other structure that is not part of a building shall not constitute a lack of rear yard access. Any recreational vehicle parking area in a side yard shall: a. Be on a hard surface compliant with the Off Street Parking Standards Manual; b. Be accessed via a driveway compliant with driveway standards of this chapter; c. Not obstruct access to other required parking for the use. SECTION 13. Amending the Text of Chapter 21A.59. That Chapter 21A.59 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Review), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 21A.59 DESIGN REVIEW SECTION: 21A.59.010: Purpose Statement 21A.59.020: Authority 21A.59.030: Design Review Process 21A.59.040: Scope of Modifications Authorized 21A.59.045: Design Review Standards Applicability 21A.59.050: Standards for Design Review 21A.59.060: Time Limit on Approved Applications for Design Review 21A.59.070: Effect of Approval of Applications for Design Review 21A.59.080: Modifications to Approved Design Review Plans 21A.59.010: PURPOSE STATEMENT: 113 The purpose of the design review chapter is to: a) establish a process and standards of review for minor modifications to applicable design standards, and b) ensure high quality outcomes for larger developments that have a significant impact on the city. The intent of the process to review applications for minor modifications to applicable design standards is to allow some flexibility in how the design standards are administered by recognizing that this title cannot anticipate all development issues that may arise. The intent of the process to review larger developments is to verify new developments are compatible with their surroundings, impacts to public infrastructure and public spaces are addressed, and that new development helps achieve development goals outlined in the adopted master plans of the city as identified in the purpose statements of each zoning district. 21A.59.020: AUTHORITY: Design review shall be required pursuant to the provisions of this chapter for developments and alternate building and site design features as specified within individual zoning districts before building permits may be issued. A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized in the specific zoning district. 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review objectives. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can 114 demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. B. Planning Commission Review: The following types of applications shall be reviewed by the planning commission. If an application for design review is not listed below, it shall be eligible for administrative review as outlined in Subsection A of this section: 1. All projects where planning commission review is required in the specific zoning district. 2. All projects that include a request for additional building height or a reduction to a minimum height requirement; 3. All projects that request additional square footage when authorized in the specific zoning district; 4. All projects that have applied for a modification of base zoning design standards but could not be approved administratively because they exceed limits identified in Section 21A.59.040, Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter. 5. Projects in the TSA Transit Station Area District that have a development score that requires planning commission review and approval. C. Planning Commission Decisions: When reviewing design review applications, the planning commission may take any of the following actions: 1. The commission shall approve a project if it finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the zoning district and applicable overlay district(s), the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives found in this chapter. 2. The commission may approve a project with conditions or modifications to the design if it determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, or the applicable design review objectives. 3. The commission shall deny the design of a project if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. D. H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Modifications to design standards for properties within an H Historic Preservation Overlay District are subject to the processes and applicable standards outlined in Section 21A.34.020 of this title and not this chapter. 21A.59.030: DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS: A. Presubmittal Meeting: A presubmittal meeting with planning staff is recommended prior to submitting an application for design review to ensure a detailed understanding of the application submission requirements and design review process. 115 B. Complete Application: The design review application is considered complete when it includes all of the following: 1. All of the application information required for site plan review as identified in Chapter 21A.58 of this title. 2. Photos showing the facades of adjacent development, trees on the site, general streetscape character, and views to and from the site. 3. Demonstration of compliance with the purpose of the individual zoning district in written narrative and graphic images. 4. Demonstration of compliance with the purpose of the applicable design standards of the individual zoning district in written narrative, graphic images, and relevant calculations. 5. Demonstration of compliance with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.060 of this chapter) in written narrative, graphics, images, and relevant calculations. 6. The zoning administrator may waive a submittal requirement if it is not necessary in order to determine if a request for a modification to a design standard complies with the standards of review. C. Public Notification and Engagement: 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an administrative decision for a modification to a specific design standard, the Pplanning director shall provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10 of this title. 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: a. Applications subject to planning commission review of this chapter are subject to notification requirements of Chapter 2.60 of this code. b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements found in Chapter 21A.10 of this title. 21A.59.040: SCOPE OF MODIFICATIONS AUTHORIZED: A. The authority of the planning director through the design review process shall be limited to modification of the specific element referenced within each zoning district. For planning director review, the design standards of the applicable zoning district (see Chapter 21A.37, “Design Standards”, of this title), may be modified according to the following table. TABLE 21A.59.040 116 Design Standards Primary Modification Allowed Secondary Modification Allowed A. Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: 1. Ground floor use only Length: 10% Depth: 20% 2. Ground floor use and visual interest planning commission only B. Building Materials: 1. Ground floor building materials planning commission only 2. Upper floor building materials planning commission only C. Glass: 1. Ground floor glass 10% 2. Upper floor glass 10% D. Building Entrances 10% E. Maximum Length of Blank Wall 10% F. Maximum Length of Street- Facing Facades 10% G. Upper Floor Stepback: 1. For street facing facades 20% 2. For facades facing single- or two- family residential districts planning commission only B. The planning commission may consider modifications that exceed allowances listed in this section or any other design standard modification authorized in the base zoning district or Chapter 21A.37 of this title. 21A.59.045: DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS APPLICABILITY: A. Design Review applications shall be reviewed for compliance with the design review standards of Section 21A.59.050, as follows: 1. General Modification Requests: Applications to modify a design standard in Chapter 21A.37, or other zoning standard specifically authorized for modification through design review, shall be reviewed for compliance with the design review standards that are directly related to the purpose of the associated regulation requested for modification. 117 2. Additional Height or Square Footage Requests: Applications required to go through design review due to a height or square footage regulation shall be reviewed for compliance with all design review standards. 3. Transit Station Area Requests: For properties in a Transit Station Area District, applications required to go through design review due to not meeting the minimum points for administrative approval shall be reviewed for compliance with all design review standards. 4. All Other Requests: Any application not covered by Subsections 1 through 3 above, shall be subject to review for compliance with all design review standards. B. Exception: For those applications required to be reviewed against all design review standards, if an application complies with a standard in the base zoning district or with an applicable requirement in Chapter 21A.37 of this title, and that standard is directly related to a standard found in this section, the planning commission shall find that application complies with the specific standard for design review found in this section. 1. If there is no directly related zoning district standard or applicable requirement in Chapter 21A.37 of this title related to the design review standard, then the design review standard applies, and the commission shall not by default make the above finding. C. Alternatives: An applicant may propose an alternative to a standard for design review provided the proposal is consistent with the intent of the standard for design review. 21A.59.050: STANDARDS FOR DESIGN REVIEW: A. Any new development shall comply with the intent of the purpose statement of the zoning district and specific design regulations found within the zoning district in which the project is located as well as the city’s adopted “urban design element” and adopted master plan policies and design guidelines governing the specific area of the proposed development. B. Development shall be primarily oriented to the sidewalk, not an interior courtyard or parking lot. 1. Primary entrances shall face the public sidewalk (secondary entrances can face a parking lot). 2. Building(s) shall be sited close to the public sidewalk, following and responding to the desired development patterns of the neighborhood. 3. Parking shall be located within, behind, or to the side of buildings. C. Building facades shall include detailing and glass in sufficient quantities to facilitate pedestrian interest and interaction. 118 1. Locate active ground floor uses at or near the public sidewalk. 2. Maximize transparency of the street facing facades by prohibiting covering the ground floor glass with reflective treatments, interior walls, and other similar features that prevent passers-by from seeing inside of the building for non-residential uses. 3. Use or reinterpret traditional storefront elements like sign bands, clerestory glazing, articulation, and architectural detail at window transitions. 4. Locate outdoor dining patios, courtyards, plazas, habitable landscaped yards, and open spaces so that they have a direct visual connection to the street and outdoor spaces. D. Large building masses shall be divided into heights and sizes that relate to human scale. 1. Relate building scale and massing to the size and scale of existing and anticipated buildings, such as alignments with established cornice heights, building massing, step-backs and vertical emphasis. 2. Modulate the design of a larger building using a series of vertical or horizontal emphases to equate with the scale (heights and widths) of the buildings in the context and reduce the visual width or height. 3. Include secondary elements such as balconies, porches, vertical bays, belt courses, fenestration and window reveals. 4. Reflect the scale and solid-to-void ratio of windows and doors of the established character of the neighborhood or that which is desired in the master plan. E. Building facades that exceed a combined contiguous building length of two hundred feet (200’) shall include: 1. Changes in vertical plane (breaks in facade); 2. Material changes; 3. Massing changes; 4. A minimum of 80% of the ground floor must be used for active, publicly accessible uses. Active uses are those that promote an active pedestrian environment through inclusion of uses that capture the attention of a passer-by. This includes retail establishments, retail services, civic spaces (theaters, museums, etc), restaurants, bars, art and craft studios, and other uses determined to be substantially similar by the planning director and/or commission; and 5. Stepback must be a minimum of 10’ from the base of the building. This allows the base to be the primary defining element for the site and the adjacent public realm, reducing wind impacts, and opening sky views. The maximum height of the base of a proposed building should be equal to the width of the right of way if allowed in the zoning district to provide sufficient enclosure for the street without overwhelming the street. The minimum height of the base must be at least two stories. 119 A building over 200’ in width shall include necessary separation from property lines to minimize the impact of shadows and development rights of adjacent properties. F. If provided, privately-owned public spaces shall include at least three of the six following elements: 1. At least one sitting space for each 250 square feet shall be included in the plaza. Seating shall be a minimum of 16” in height and 30” in width. Ledge benches shall have a minimum depth of 30”; 2. A mixture of areas that provide seasonal shade; 3. Trees in proportion to the space at a minimum of one tree per 800 square feet, at least 2” caliper when planted; 4. Water features or public art; 5. Outdoor dining areas; and 6. Other amenities not listed above that provide a public benefit. G. Building height shall be modified to relate to human scale and minimize negative impacts. In downtown and in the CSHBD Sugar House Business District, building height shall contribute to a distinctive city skyline. 1. Human scale: a. Utilize stepbacks to design a building that relate to the height and scale of adjacent and nearby buildings, or where identified, goals for future scale defined in adopted master plans. b. The minimum stepback for any building located in a zoning district that does not contain an upper level stepback provision shall be 10’. This stepback is only required for applications requesting additional height when authorized in the underlying zoning district. The stepback shall be applied to the first full floor of the building that is seeking the request for additional height. c. For buildings more than three stories or buildings with vertical mixed use, compose the design of a building with distinct base, to reduce the sense of apparent height. 2. Negative impacts: All buildings seeking additional height as authorized in the underlying zoning district shall be subject to the following standards: a. Modulate taller buildings vertically and horizontally so that it steps up or down to its neighbors. b. Minimize shadow impacts of building height on the public realm and semi-public spaces by varying building massing. Demonstrate impact from shadows due to building height for the portions of the building that are subject to the request for additional height. 120 c. Modify tall buildings to minimize wind impacts on public and private spaces, such as the inclusion of a wind break above the first level of the building. d. Design and orient to prevent snow, ice, or water from falling directly onto a public sidewalk, public space, neighboring property, or directly onto the walkway leading to the building entrance. 3. Cornices and rooflines: a. Cohesiveness: Shape and define rooflines to be cohesive with the building’s overall form and composition. The roofline and architectural detailing, including cornices, shall be complimentary to the structure’s scale, material, color, and form and create a change in plane of at least 6 inches, a change in material, utilizing at least one visible sloping plan along a minimum of 50% of the roofline on building elevations facing a street, or a change in material orientation to define the roof line of the building. b. Green Roof and Roof Deck: Include a green roof and/or accessible roof deck to support a more visually compelling roof landscape and reduce solar gain, air pollution, and the amount of water entering the stormwater system. H. Parking and on site circulation shall be provided with an emphasis on making safe pedestrian connections to the sidewalk, transit facilities, or midblock walkway. Parking is encouraged to be behind the principal building and away from pedestrian walkways. Parking lots and structures shall be setback a minimum of 25’ from required midblock pedestrian access locations or as required in the underlying zoning district if the underlying zoning requires a larger setback. I. Waste and recycling containers, mechanical equipment, storage areas, and loading docks shall be fully screened from public view and, for buildings with only one street-facing frontage, are prohibited from being located along street-facing facades. They shall incorporate building materials and detailing compatible with the building being served and shall be co-located with driveways unless prohibited by the presence of a street tree, public infrastructure, or public facility within the right of way. Service uses may be located within the structure. (See Subsection 21A.37.050.K of this title.) J. Signage shall emphasize the pedestrian/mass transit orientation. 1. Define specific spaces for signage that are integral to building design, such as commercial sign bands framed by a material change, columns for blade signs, or other clearly articulated band on the face of the building. 2. Coordinate signage locations with appropriate lighting, awnings, and other projections. 3. Coordinate sign location with landscaping to avoid conflicts. 121 K. Lighting shall support pedestrian comfort and safety, neighborhood image, and dark sky goals. 1. Provide street lights as indicated in the Salt Lake City Lighting Master Plan. 2. Outdoor lighting should be designed for low-level illumination and to minimize glare and light trespass onto adjacent properties and uplighting directly to the sky. 3. Coordinate lighting with architecture, signage, and pedestrian circulation to accentuate significant building features, improve sign legibility, and support pedestrian comfort and safety. L. Streetscape improvements shall be provided as follows: 1. One street tree chosen from the street tree list consistent with the city’s urban forestry guidelines and, with the approval of the city’s urban forester, shall be placed for every 30’ of property frontage on a street. Existing street trees removed as the result of a development project shall be replaced by the developer with trees approved by the city’s urban forester. 2. Hardscape (paving material) shall be utilized to differentiate privately-owned public spaces from public spaces. Hardscape for public sidewalks shall follow applicable design standards. Permitted materials for privately-owned public spaces shall meet the following standards: a. Use materials that are durable (withstand wear, pressure, damage), require a minimum of maintenance, and are easily repairable or replaceable should damage or defacement occur. b. Where practical, as in lower-traffic areas, use materials that allow rainwater to infiltrate into the ground and recharge the water table. c. Limit contribution to urban heat island effect by limiting use of dark materials and incorporating materials with a high Solar- Reflective Index (SRI). d. Utilize materials and designs that have an identifiable relationship to the character of the site, the neighborhood, or Salt Lake City. e. Use materials (like textured ground surfaces) and features (like ramps and seating at key resting points) to support access and comfort for people of all abilities. f. Asphalt shall be limited to vehicle drive aisles. 21A.59.060: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED APPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW: No design review approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year from the date of approval unless a building permit is issued or a complete building plans and building permit applications have been submitted to the Division of Building Services and Licensing. An extension of one year may be granted by the entity that approved the application. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the expiration of the design review approval. 122 21A.59.070: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR DESIGN REVIEW: A. The approval of a design review application shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, a building permit. B. Following the approval of a design review application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the approved design review application unless a modification is approved subject to the process outlined in this chapter. 21A.59.080: MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW PLANS: A. Minor Modifications: The planning director may authorize minor modifications to approved design review applications as listed below. 1. Dimensional requirements that are necessary in order to comply with adopted building codes, fire codes, or engineering standards. The modification is limited to the minimum amount necessary to comply with the applicable building code, fire codes, or engineering standard. 2. Minor changes to building materials provided the modification is limited to the dimension of the material, color of material, or texture of material. Changes to a different material shall not be considered a minor modification. 3. Modifications other than those listed in Subsections 1 and 2 that comply with an applicable standard in this Title provided the standard was not subject to a requested modification as part of this process or any other process authorized by this title and does not conflict with a specific condition of approval or a finding associated with the approval. B. Other Modifications: Any other modifications not listed in Subsection A of this section shall be processed as follows: 1. If the proposed modification does not require a change to a condition of approval or a finding that was identified in a staff report or record of decision the matter may be reviewed by the planning commission, or in the case of administrative approvals, by the planning director, as a reconsideration of that specific modification subject to a public hearing for planning commission decisions or a notice of application for administrative approvals. 2. Any other modification shall require a new application and be subject to all required processes and standards. 123 SECTION 14. Amending the Text of Subsection 21A.27.050.D (Contingent on Adoption of the FB-UN3 District). That, if Subsection 21A.27.050.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Form Based Districts: FB-UN1, FB-UN2, and FB-UN3 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District) is adopted by the date of the City Council adopting this ordinance, that subsection shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.27.050.D. FB-UN3 Building Form Standards: Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the FB-UN3 zone are listed in the below tables of this section. 1. Row House Building Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.D.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 5’. Maximum 10’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is adjacent to a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and rear property line, except when rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. 124 GU Ground Floor Use on 900 South The required ground floor use space facing 900 South must be occupied by a live/work space at least 25’ in depth. Dimensions may be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030B for allowed entry features. Dwelling units adjacent to a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.27.030.C.5, with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly adjacent to a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 125 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: TABLE 21A.27.050.D.2 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 125’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 85’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback No minimum is required; however, doors are prohibited from opening into the public right of way. Maximum 10’ unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 5’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is adjacent to a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when rear yard is adjacent to a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered adjacent. GU Ground Floor Use on 900 South The required ground floor use space facing 900 South shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units adjacent to a street must have an allowed entry feature. See Table 21A.27.030B for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.27.030.C.5, are required to each required entry feature. 126 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2023. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. U Upper Level Stepback When adjacent to a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is adjacent to the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. M W Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Vegetation A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. LB Loading Bay Maximum of one (1) loading bay on a front façade per street face, subject to all dimensional requirements in Section 21A.44.070. Loading bay entry width limited to 14’ and must be screened by garage door. One loading bay driveway is allowed in addition to any other driveway allowances. DS Design Standards See Section 21A.27.030 and Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 127 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2023. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney December 21, 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Clean Ordinance 5. Public Comment Received After Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 6. Proposed Graphic Changes 7. Proposed Amendments to Off-Street Parking 8. Mailing List 1) PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2022-00529 December 10, 2020 Salt Lake City Corporation applies for a Transportation and Land Use Connection Grant from Wasatch Front Regional Council. March 15, 2021 Salt Lake City awarded the Transportation and Land Use Connection Grant. October 15, 2021 Design Workshop tours SLC November 30, 2021 Design Workshop and SLC Planning Division held a stakeholder meeting with the local development community. December 1, 2021 Design Workshop and SLC Planning Division held a stakeholder meeting with the Neighborhood Councils and Downtown Development Committee. December 2, 2021 Design Workshop and the SLC Planning Division held a stakeholder meeting with an ADA community representative group. January 17, 2022 A public visual preference survey was advertised on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. January 19, 2022 Design Workshop held a stakeholder meeting with the Downtown Alliance. May 9, 2022 The proposed code changes were posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage. May 13, 2022 An informational postcard was mailed to approximately 1,700 property owners within the study area informing them of the study and providing them with a QR code to obtain more information. June 1, 2022 The Planning Division presented an update to the Downtown Development Committee. June 8, 2022 Design Workshop briefs Salt Lake City Planning Commission August 24, 2022 Planning Commission forwards a positive recommendation to City Council 2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-00529 – A petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Code for the Downtown Building Height and Street Activation Text Amendment. This proposal includes amendments to the following zoning districts: D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, CG, FBUN1, and FBUN2. Additionally, the proposed code revisions aim to accommodate growth and respond to new development pressures, while developing standards for public spaces. Changes seek to have a positive impact on human-scale orientation, pedestrian accessibility, and community character. The City Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. All persons interested and present will be given an opportunity to be heard in this matter. his meeting will be held via electronic means, while potentially also providing for an in person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building,located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting, please visit the website www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings/ or call 801-535-7654 to obtain connection information. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Kelsey Lindquist at 385-226-7227 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail Kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535- 7600, or relay service 711. 3) ORIGINAL PETITION 41 N. Rio Grande Street, Suite 103 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 (801) 363-4250 www.wfrc.org Jeff Silvestrini, Chair Mayor, Millcreek Jeff Scott, Vice Chair Commissioner, Box Elder County Mark Allen Mayor, Washington Terrace Len Arave Mayor, North Salt Lake Ron Bigelow Mayor, West Valley Mike Caldwell Mayor, Ogden Robert Dahle Mayor, Holladay Jim Harvey Commissioner, Weber County Scott Jenkins Commissioner, Weber County Randy Lewis Mayor, Bountiful Erin Mendenhall Mayor, Salt Lake City Mike Newton Councilmember, Morgan County Mark Shepherd Mayor, Clearfield Bob Stevenson Commissioner, Davis County Derk Timothy Mayor, Bluffdale Troy Walker Mayor, Draper Scott Wardle Councilmember, Tooele County Jenny Wilson Mayor, Salt Lake County Aimee Winder-Newton Councilmember, Salt Lake County Senator Wayne Harper Utah State Senate Representative Mike Schultz Utah House of Representatives Carlton Christensen Utah Transit Authority Carlos Braceras Utah Department of Transportation Dawn Ramsey Utah League of Cities & Towns Lorene Kamalu Utah Association of Counties Ari Bruening Envision Utah Evan Curtis State Planning Coordinator ______________________________________ Andrew Gruber Executive Director March 15, 2021 Dear Salt Lake City: The Transportation and Land Use Connection program partners would like to thank you for your participation in the program,and we are pleased to inform you that your project will be receiving funding in the 2021 award year. The Downtown Building Height and Public/Ped Space Code Update project will receive an award of $102,500 contingent upon a local match of $7,500,for a total project budget of $110,000.The next step in the process is to sign a Letter of Concurrence,which will be sent to you by your WFRC project manager,who will be assigned in the coming weeks.An invoice for the local match will also be sent.Prior to being assigned a project manager,please let me know if you have any questions. Your project manager will guide you through the process of completing this important effort; you can become familiar with the next steps here.We hope this award fills a need for your community, and we look forward to seeing this project through to success. Congratulations, Megan Townsend Community and Economic Development Director Wasatch Front Regional Council (801) 404-8925 4) PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER PLANNING COMMISSIONS STAFF REPORT PUBLISHED 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, UT 84101 August 24, 2022 c/o Aubrey Clark, Administrative Secretary Salt Lake City Planning Commission 451 State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 RE: Downtown Building Heights & Street Activation Text Amendment Dear Planning Commissioners, The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) is intensely interested in Salt Lake City’s effort to assess potential height increases in its downtown zones and would encourage maximizing development potential within the station area, particularly on the parcels immediately adjacent to Salt Lake Central Station. UTA, in collaboration with the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency (SLC-RDA), is preparing for the redevelopment of a significant amount of property around North Temple and Salt Lake Central Stations. The concept for Central Station envisions a substantial, mixed-use structure, opposite the Historic Rio Grande Depot, bookending the city’s planned 300 South festival street. It will include significant improvements to pedestrian and passenger amenities, providing a drastically improved transit gateway experience to the city. It will also include space for UTA’s relocated headquarters, replacing its current building, which is aging and in poor seismic condition. Moving UTA’s administrative functions to Salt Lake Central will build on the development activity along 200 South and the Salt Lake City RDA’s plans for properties within the Depot District. Salt Lake Central and the Depot District are at the intersection of the most transit-connected location in the state. To maximize this opportunity, UTA will explore providing additional space beyond its own needs. UTA plans to construct as many additional floors as the city will allow and the market will support. This would capitalize on the transit investments the city and state have made in the neighborhood by encouraging more ridership and decreasing the impact of single occupancy commuter trips into the downtown core. The proposed code changes before the Planning Commission, affecting building heights in the Gateway Mixed Use District, are a positive step in the right direction. However, UTA is concerned that artificially limiting heights near the station will unduly restrain the potential of Salt Lake Central and surrounding development. UTA requests the Planning Commission consider further increasing height allowances, or eliminating height limitations altogether, in this critical location for commercial mixed uses and office before advancing this proposal to City Council. We recognize that the city may desire to retain control, through design review or other means, but feel the benefit to the city and value of increased land use intensity around this regionally significant transit hub warrant additional consideration. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Carlton J. Christensen Chair of the Board of Trustees 5) PROPOSED GRAPHIC CHANGES 6) MAILING LIST Item E14 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: 792 West 900 South & 875 South 800 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2022-00587 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE: 792 West 900 South & 875 South 800 West Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2022-00587 BRIEFING UPDATE During the April 4, 2023 briefing Council Members discussed potential alternative zoning that might be more appropriate for the subject parcels. Planning staff noted multi-family developments on small lots is difficult, and the proposed R-MU zoning designation is one of the few zones that does not require larger setbacks than would be possible on these small parcels. The petitioner stated there are utility easements on the south and west sides of the parcels that effectively act as setbacks. If approved, the petitioner would likely need to seek a planned development prior to construction of the proposed fourplexes to reduce required minimum lot widths. The need for more density in the area was discussed, along with a desire for more family housing rather than the proposed one-bedroom units. The following information was provided for the April 4, 2023 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for parcels at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West in City Council District Two from their current M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning designation to R-MU (Residential/Mixed-Use). The petitioner’s stated objective is to construct a fourplex on each of the two vacant parcels. This use is not permitted under current zoning. Item Schedule: Briefing: April 4, 2023 Set Date: April 4, 2023 Public Hearing: April 18, 2023 Potential Action: May 2, 2023 Page | 2 The parcels are located on the southwest corner of 800 West and 900 South. Area zoning is a mix of M-1, R-MU/R-MU-35 (Residential/Mixed-Use), and R-1/5,000 (Single-family Residential) as shown in the zoning map below. Council Members may recall approving a similar zoning change from M-1 to R-MU-35 to a nearby parcel at 805 South 800 West in summer 2022. Most parcels on the east half of the block were rezoned to R-MU a few years ago. The exception is a parcel on the northeast corner of Genesee Avenue and 700 West where the Summum religious organization is located. That parcel is zoned M-1. Although zoned M-1, most parcels on the east side of 800 West between 800 South and 900 South are single-family residences. Parcels on the west side of 800 West in this area are primarily single-family residences in keeping with their R-1/5,000 zoning. Planning staff discussed the requested zoning designation with the petitioner and encouraged him to consider other zoning districts such as R-MU-35 with what Planning believed have development regulations more compatible with Westside Master Plan policies, and with existing development on surrounding parcels. The petitioner chose to pursue the rezone to R-MU. The Planning Commission staff report says the proposed zoning map amendment does not meet three of the four applicable zoning amendment standards (shown in the table later in this report), and Planning staff recommended the Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning map amendment at its February 8, 2023 meeting. Commissioners asked the petitioner why he is not considering R-MU-35 zoning. He said additional setbacks, and parking requirements would make development on these small parcels difficult. The petitioner stated he plans to provide off-street parking, but the lot sizes will not allow one space per dwelling unit required in R-MU-35 zoning. (It is worth noting the City right-of-way extends approximately 12 feet from the sidewalk on the subject parcels. While there is no required front, side yard, or corner side yard setback for multi-family residential uses in the R-MU zoning district, these rights-of-way would effectively function as setbacks if the zoning map amendment is approved by the Council.) The petitioner also stated he voluntarily placed a deed restriction on the parcels limiting building height to 35 feet to minimize impact to nearby single-family homes. Buildings up to 60 feet high are allowed by right in the existing M-1 zoning district and up to 75 feet for residential uses (45 feet for non-residential) within the proposed R-MU zoning. It was mentioned that a deed restriction placed by the property owner could also be removed by him, which would provide little guarantee building heights would be limited to 35 feet. There was a discussion about potentially working with the petitioner on a development agreement to limit building height to 35 feet. The Council could discuss this with the petitioner. The Commission held a public hearing at which no one spoke and voted 6-5 to forward a positive recommendation to the Council. Those who voted in support of the recommendation cited the need for housing, recent rezoning to R-MU of large parcels to the east, and the area master plan is several years old. Commissioners voting against the recommendation expressed concerns with the proposal not meeting three of the four standards for zoning changes, and a hesitance voting to recommend a zoning change without a proposed development and/or plans to consider. Page | 3 Area zoning map with subject parcels outlined in red. Note-the green area to the south is the 9-Line Trail. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to ask the petitioner if the proposed dwelling units would be for sale or for rent. 2. The Council may wish to ask the petitioner if he is willing to enter into a development agreement with the City limiting building height to 35 feet. 3. The Council may wish to discuss with the Attorney’s office if a stronger tool than a development agreement, such as a restrictive covenant that runs with the land, would provide greater confidence that future developments would not exceed 35 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Given the subject parcel sizes, it is unlikely a building could be constructed to heights approaching what is allowed under the current M-1 zoning (up to 65 feet), or the proposed R-MU zoning (up to 75 feet for residential use) unless the parcels are combined with adjacent parcels. Under the proposed R-MU zoning designation, minimum lot width is 50 feet for multi-family buildings. The parcels are approximately 29 feet wide. If the request is approved by the Council, the petitioner would need to have planned development approval from the Planning Commission to construct multi-family buildings. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. Page | 4 KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 4-7 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1-Westside Master Plan Guidance The subject parcels are in the area covered by the Westside Master Plan, adopted in 2014. Planning staff stated: While the Westside Master Plan supports unique and compatible ways to add incremental density through infill development, it states that infill development should adhere to the prevailing development pattern in the immediate area – which in this particular area is predominantly single family residential. New development should not change the character of the neighborhood, rather, it should be a complement to the areas of opportunity identified in the Westside Master Plan. The Planning Commission staff report acknowledges current M-1 zoning allows heights and uses are incompatible with surrounding development and what the master plan calls for. The master plan identifies the subject vacant parcels as appropriate for medium-density rather than high-density housing. The Planning Commission staff report indicated R-MU zoning would allow development incompatible with the specific area. Information from other City plans reviewed for this petition is included in Attachment D (pages 30-32) of the Planning Commission staff report. Consideration 2-Compatibility with Adjacent Properties Development along 800 West is primarily single-family residential, with some R-MU-35 on the west side of the street to the north. As noted above, the Planning Commission staff report states existing M-1 zoning is not compatible with surrounding properties, nor is the proposed R-MU zoning designation. The report calls for a zoning district that provides “…attractive, compatible, and moderate density, mixed-use development with an emphasis on pedestrian scale activity while maintaining compatibility with the existing development pattern of the area.” ZONING COMPARISON M-1 (Existing)R-MU (Proposed) Maximum Building Height 65 feet 75 feet for residential uses 45 feet for non-residential uses Front Setback 15 feet None required Side Setback Corner side yard: 15 feet Interior side yard: none required Corner side yard: None required Interior: None required Rear Setback None required 25% of lot depth but need not exceed 30 feet. Lot Size Minimum lot area: 10,000 square feet Minimum lot width: 80 feet (Lots legally existing as of April 12, 1995 are considered legal conforming lots.) No minimum required for multi- family residential. Minimum lot width: 50 feet (Would need planned development for multi-family residential.) Page | 5 Analysis of Factors Attachment E (pages 33-34) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. In brief, Planning staff felt the proposed R-MU zoning is potentially higher density, and a more intense land use than is appropriate for the area. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Does not comply Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Does not comply The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties Does not comply Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Not applicable The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies City Department Review During City review of the petitions, no responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal, but stated additional review and permits would be required if the property is developed. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • June 8, 2022-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • June 30, 2022-Petition assigned to Kaitlynn Harris, Principal Planner. • September 21, 2022-Information about petition sent to Poplar Grove and Glendale Community Council Chairs, and surrounding neighbors and property owners. Project posted to City website for an online open house. o The Poplar Grove Community Council provided a letter supportive of the proposed zoning map amendment. • January 27, 2023-Planning Commission public hearing notice posted on property. o Public hearing notice mailed to surrounding neighbors and property owners, and posted to City website. Page | 6 • February 8, 2023-Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 6-5 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • February 8, 2023-Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office. • March 1, 2023-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • March 10, 2023-Transmittal received in City Council Office. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 10, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2022-00587 Zoning Map Amendment at 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W STAFF CONTACT: Katilynn Harris, Principal Planner katilynn.harris@slcgov.com or (801) 535-6179 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the proposed Zoning Map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a request by Cameron Broadbent, the property owner, to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Map from M-1 Light Manufacturing to R-MU Residential Mixed-Use at 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W. The proposed zoning map amendment is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. The applicant has indicated one of the reasons for proposing the R-MU zone is because of the flexibility the zone provides related to setback and parking requirements – there is no front, corner, or interior side yard setback and there is no off-street parking requirements for multi-family in the R-MU zone. No development plans have been submitted at this time. If the amendment is approved, the applicant could develop the site with any permitted or conditional use in accordance with the R-MU zoning standards. The request did not require a master plan amendment. 3/10/2023 3/10/2023 rachel otto (Mar 10, 2023 15:10 MST) The Westside Master Plan is the applicable community plan for this property. The property is located in the 700 West industrial corridor which is a swath of development consisting of mostly industrial uses abutting single-family homes between 800 South and approximately 1400 South. At its widest, the corridor is about a quarter-mile wide and extends as far west as 800 West. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at a public hearing on February 8, 2023. The commission determined that the request improves density with minimal neighbor complaint, meets Salt Lake City’s goals of a variety of housing types, and improves air quality. The commission voted (6-5) to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council to amend the zoning map as requested. PUBLIC PROCESS: • September 21, 2022 – Early notification was sent to the Poplar Grove and Glendale Community Councils. Poplar Grove Community Council sent a letter of support dated December 12, 2022 which is attached to the Planning Commission Staff Report. • September 21, 2022 – Early notification was sent to all residents and property owners within 300 FT of the subject properties. Staff received two emails in support of the rezone. • September 2022 – January 2023 – An online open house was held for the proposal • February 8, 2023 – Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to amend the zoning map for the subject properties from M-1 to R-MU to the City Council for their review and decision. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS of FEBRUARY 8, 2023: Planning Commission Agenda Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Hearing 90 0 W 90 0 W 900 S 900 S Subject properties are highlighted in red 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2023 (Amending the zoning of property located at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2022-00587 (the “Petition”). WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on February 8, 2023 on the Petition submitted by Cameron Broadbent to rezone two parcels located at 792 West 900 South (Tax ID No. 15-11-277-009) and 875 South 800 West (Tax ID No. 15-11-277-008) (collectively the “Property”) from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District; WHEREAS, at its February 8, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) on the Petition; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property, identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from M-1 Light Manufacturing District to R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code §10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2023. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2023. Published: ______________. Ordinance amending zoning map at 792 West 900 South and 875 South 800 West APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney March 1, 2023 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description of Property to be Rezoned: 792 West 900 South Street Tax ID No. 15-11-277-009 The South 29 feet of Lot 24, 25, and 26, CUMMINGS SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2, PLAT “C”, Salt Lake City Survey, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. 875 South 800 West Street Tax ID No. 15-11-277-008 Commencing 29 feet North of the Southwest corner of Lot 26, CUMMINGS SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 2, PLAT “C” Salt Lake City Survey; running thence North 28 feet; thence East 80 feet; thence South 28 feet; thence West 80 feet to the point of beginning, Salt Lake County, State of Utah. 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Project Chronology Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W – PLNPCM2022-00587 June 8, 2022 June 30, 2022 September 21, 2022 January 27, 2023 February 3, 2023 February 8, 2023 ________, 2023 Cameron Broadbent, the property owner, filed the Zoning Map amendment application. The subject property is located at 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W and encompasses approximately 0.10 acres (4,561 square feet). Application assigned to Katilynn Harris, Principal Planner. Sent notifications to Popular Grove Community Council, Glendale Community Council, and surrounding neighbors and property owners. Project posted to city website for an online Open House. Sign posted on subject property. Public hearing notice sent out and posted to city website. Public input period closed. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and with a 6-5 vote, forwarded a positive recommendation to amend the zoning map for the subject property from M-1 to R-MU to the City Council for their review and decision. Signed ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2022-00587 – Cameron Broadbent, the property owner, is requesting to amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Map for the property located at approximately 792 W 900 S & 875 S 800 W. The proposal would rezone the property from M-1 Light Manufacturing to R-MU Residential Mixed-Use. The subject parcels are approximately .10 acres or 4,561 square feet. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to allow the property owner to develop two small multi-family dwellings. No development plans have been submitted at this time. The properties are within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. (Staff contact: Katilynn Harris at 801-535-6179 or katilynn.harris@slcgov.com). Case number: PLNPCM2022-00587 As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Katilynn Harris at 801-535-6179 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at katilynn.harris@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-00587. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION Zoning Map Amendment Salt Lake City Parcels Involved 15112770080000 – 875 South 800 West COM 29 FT N OF SW COR LOT 26 CUMMINGS SUB OF BLK 2 PLAT C N 28 FT E 80 FT S 28 FT W 80 FT TO BEG 6665-2026 10243-2811 15112770090000 - 792 West 900 South S 29 FT OF LOTS 24 25 & 26 CUMMINGS SUB OF BLK 2 PLAT C 5191-0980 6038-0771 6050-1172 6665-2032 10243-2813 1. Project Description This proposal to amend the zoning map is initiated by the property owner and involves two vacant parcels on the corner of 900 South and 800 West which total 0.10 acres. The property is intended to be used for small multi-family housing, duplex, triplex or fourplex, often referred to as the “missing middle” in Salt Lake City planning documents. Several Salt Lake City planning documents have outlined a change in Salt Lake City public policy for this area due to various reasons. These include the ever increasing housing crisis in the city and the associated need for diverse housing options, beatification and utilization of the 9 Line corridor, the need for safe and efficient housing, flexible zoning tools and regulations to meet today’s conditions, and the need for effective, high quality, in-fill development. The majority, approximately 80%, of the 700-800 West block face for 900 South is unoccupied land. With over 50% of the block face’s zoning being changed in 2020 from M-1 to R-MU, the change in public policy for the block face is clear. This zoning map amendment completes the zoning change for the block face’s ONLY remaining vacant parcel. This zoning amendment is supported by the following Salt Lake City planning documents: Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 9 Line Corridor Master Plan, Adopted March 3, 2015 The Westside Master Plan, Adopted December 3, 2014 Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan | 2017 Executive Summary Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, December 2015 Salt Lake City Westside Transportation Equity Study, 2021 Plan Salt Lake – Salt Lake City | Citywide Vision, Adopted December 1, 2015 1.a Purpose Of The Amendment The purpose of this Zoning Amendment is to continue the work by the owner to beautify 800 West over a three block stretch, 800 South to Fayette Avenue, where the owner has built two new homes in the last three years. The owner desires to provide a custom-designed, custom-built residence appropriately-sized and beautifully landscaped which will offer direct access to recreation, public transit and non-car transportation on an east-west corridor in which the Westside Master Plan considers “in need of the most attention” (p.71 of the Westside Master Plan). The owner has a track record of developing custom, energy-efficient homes built to match the size and period of the surrounding neighborhood which fit in with the community (804 West Genesee and 802 West Fayette). Salt Lake City inspectors and neighbors who’ve viewed the owner’s previous work in its entirety can both attest to the owner’s commitment to personally building to the highest standard possible and being onsite during the build process to ensure quality building which enhances the community. Additionally, over the last three years, the owner has planted over 150 trees, shrubs, bushes, grasses and flowers along 800 West via approved landscape plans submitted to the city. 1.b Description Of The Proposed Use Of The Property Being Rezoned “The purpose of the R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District is to reinforce the mixed use character of the area and encourage the development of areas as high density residential urban neighborhoods containing retail, service commercial, and small scale office uses. This district is appropriate in areas of the City where the applicable master plans support high density, mixed use development. The standards for the district are intended to facilitate the creation of a walkable urban neighborhood with an emphasis on pedestrian scale activity while acknowledging the need for transit and automobile access” (SLC Zoning Code). With the 9 Line corridor helping to create a “walkable urban neighborhood,” developing these lots with the intent of restoring the “missing middle” living option adds to the mixed use character of the area. While a “hotel” is a permitted use in the M-1 zone for legal lots like this one, the owner believes building a small, multi-family unit brings longer-term residents that better weave into the fabric of the existing community. The owner agrees with the SLC Planning Commission’s 2020 allowance for one owner to change most of the block face and all the other vacant parcels to R-MU zoning. The owner believes this zoning is more in harmony with SLC’s guiding master plans previously mentioned and shown in “City Goals” section 1.c below. 1.c Reasons Why The Present Zoning May Not Be Appropriate For The Area Reasons are included in the headings: City Goals, Transportation and Equality City Goals With 160 people per day moving to Utah, their presence has become noticeable on our public roads (KSLTV.com, 12/28/2021). If we can create homes for people in places where walkable neighborhood infrastructure and public transit is already in place, we’re helping achieve the goals of several SLC master plans. These goals help our community ease car traffic, improve air quality and encourage healthy living. It’s interesting to note that the 9 Line corridor plan, which creates a walkable neighborhood connecting the east and west side of downtown SLC, is so important that it’s one of the very few streets to ever have its own SLC master plan. Salt Lake City has historically built effective public/private partnerships which began with the city making large infrastructure changes followed by zoning changes to accomplish additional reinvestment in the community. TRAX may be a good example of this. The TRAX installation was followed by zoning changes which introduced development along its corridor thru the city. The city’s massive undertaking along the 900 South corridor seems similar to TRAX and offers pedestrian-friendly transportation. With the block face of 900 South between 700-800 West being 80% unoccupied space, it offers the perfect place to make zoning changes which bring additional investment to our community. This change is already underway. Many vacant land owners over several blocks to the east have already changed zoning along the 9 Line corridor. Many city planning documents support this change. Some excerpts below (shown in different fonts, text, etc.) are directly from these documents and are shared in this section “City Goals” for the benefit of those wishing to be more familiar with relevant SLC planning documents. Plan Salt Lake – Salt Lake City | Citywide Vision, Adopted December 1, 2015. Sections below are from pages 9-10: “Guiding Principles” from Plan Salt Lake comes from p. 14: Plan Salt Lake “Housing Initiatives” below are taken from p.39. 2. The “missing middle” option, duplex, triplex and fourplex, offers us a way to increase the number of medium density housing options without adversely affecting the residential community. 3. The “missing middle” proposed for the corner of 900 South 800 West would naturally offer ground level living in an approachable living arrangement. 4. Building on the 9 Line corridor offers residents a recreational hub in “people- oriented” housing. 5. This rezone offers a moderate density increase appropriate for the existing neighborhood. 7. Public transit and pedestrian-friendly transit are both available to this lot. “Plans Salt Lake” suggests this is the type of residential area appropriate for high density. Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p.11 & 50. Interesting to point out that Growing SLC’s findings suggested 52% of commuters would consider living in Salt Lake City if housing were more affordable. Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 Composition of SLC residents are shown below (p.14 & 50) Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p. 16 below offers additional “Guiding Principles” appropriating funds. While no public funds are being sought for this development, it seems relevant to call out: Point#8 encourages us to call for a spectrum of housing options for people of all backgrounds and incomes. Point#16 calls out what some city documents refer to as the “missing middle.” It also encourages diversifying housing stock to include this option which is often not developed. This is due to rising development costs bringing about developer’s focus on multi-story apartment buildings. Point#17 encourages us to include affordable housing options where possible near transit- oriented development areas. It also encourages moderate increases in density along transit corridors. Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p. 17 & 18 below emphasizes what it believes our #1 goal is together: Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 p. 19 below mentions the “missing middle” and encourages us to all help with “finding a place for these types [of housing] throughout the city” as they help with “restoring choices for a wider variety of household sizes.” P.10 of the Westside Master Plan shows how the “missing middle” zoning (duplex zoning) represents just 2% of total zoning (2014). P.10 of the Westside Master Plan suggests the Westside would benefit from better integrating multifamily into the rest of the community rather than repeating the past and concentrating it so heavily (50%+) in just six developments. P. 33 of the Westside Master Plan mentions, “There are also several vacant or underutilized parcels that can be developed as infill parcels, and, depending on their size, can be seen as opportunities for multi-family projects.” “Multi-family residential infill will require some zoning ordinance modification” (p.33). P. 34 of the Westside Master Plan also suggests that “infill development adhere to the prevailing development pattern in the immediate area.” More than 50% of the block face of 900 South was recently rezoned to a Residential Mixed Use (R-MU); this is clearly an undeniable pattern. The proposed zoning change is in line with that pattern of development on the existing block face. Furthermore, the Westside Master Plan encouraged the Salt Lake Planning Division to “Explore regulatory options for allowing two- or multi-family development” where appropriate. It also mentioned that it would be helpful to “add even a small amount of additional density without impacting the prevailing single-family character of the Westside and potentially introduce unique housing types and designs to the community or the city” (p.34). This rezone allowing for development of the “Missing Middle” helps achieve the recommendation to the Salt Lake Planning Division by adding just a small amount of additional density that’s in harmony with the character of the existing community. P.69-71 of the Westside Master Plan speaks specifically of the 700 West corridor (Gateways & Industrial Districts): The “Moving Forward” section to the left comes from p.73 of the Westside Master Plan. The Planning Division has made the 9 Line corridor a priority and work is now underway. ALL infill vacant land (owned by one party) on the block face of 900 South 700-800 West has been changed to R- MU, and the owner of the last remaining vacant parcel on the block face has requested it now be change to R- MU. 800 West’s 90’ width makes it a natural buffer between mixed use and residential zoning. Master Plan recommendations include flexible zoning in this area allowing 50 or more dwelling units per acre. Even on a national level, the Federal government sees this area and this lot’s entire north side block face (not the south) specifically as a “distressed area.” The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has placed this block face in what it terms the “Opportunity Zone” where it invites owners to aid in developing this area for the benefit of the community (https://opportunityzones.hud.gov/resources/map). Transportation The current M-1 zoning does not allow for a small, multi-family home despite immediate access to public transit and recreation. With 160 new residents per day arriving, it’s clear why the Utah State House Speaker mentioned transportation being the first issue when he commented on the influx of residents. He said, “State leaders are very aware of problems associated with a booming population…growth doesn’t have to be the enemy but that Utah needs to be thoughtful with long-term planning for transportation, housing and recreation” (KSLTV.com, 12/28/2021). The Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan suggested that after gathering public import, one of the key themes regarding transportation was a need for better options and “support for conventional and low stress bikeways that are designed well, especially to minimize intersection conflicts” (P. ES-2). The Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan 2017 Executive Summary suggested that “through public outreach efforts for the Transit Master Plan and past SLC planning efforts” transit officials learned that “forty-three percent (43%) of participants in the Design Your Transit System Tool indentified improved access to transit on foot and by bike as a priority” (p.107). Additionally, some age groups that are likely to rent their home (18-36 year old Millennials) are more active, taking 23% fewer driving trips, 16% more walking trips and 24% more biking trips than other households (p.7). “Public transit is also the primary mode of travel for many of the approximately 1 in 10 Salt Lake City residen ts that have a disability” (p.7). A ground-level home is more accommodating to some disabilities and will naturally be a part of a small, multi-family home. On a health note, obesity rates in Salt Lake County are at approximately 27%. Housing near transit and recreational opportunities increase physical activity and improve health (p.7). A home with direct access to the 9 Line corridor offers this opportunity. The 9 Line Corridor Master Plan mentioned its intent is to function as “An urban thoroughfare and public open space, helping people make connections, reduce barriers, promote healthy lifestyles.” Another part of its purpose is to help “a diverse assemblage of people and user groups, [provide]the opportunity for enhancing their connections to the surrounding businesses and neighborhoods that form a unique and attractive community” (p. 9). The rezoning of this underutilized land helps us achieve this vision of bringing a “Diverse assemblage of people” together to use the 9 Line space to connect people to recreation, public transit and the surrounding businesses. Equality Equality is a characteristic woven into Salt Lake City’s guiding master plans. The 9 Line Corridor Master Plan (2015) makes mention of reducing barriers and improving physical and cultural connections between the east and west sides of the City that in turn offer regional connections (p. 9). This zoning change helps people connect and reduces the barriers of east-west divide. Growing SLC: A Five Year Housing Plan 2018-2022 mentions the growing disparity between wages and rental rates appears to be creating greater instability in the lives of low-income households (p.10). “The housing crisis also impacts middle-income households” (p.11). Higher income households appear to enjoy more housing stability. This zoning change helps provide lower rents and more stability to both low- and middle-income households with more diverse, quality housing stock in a middle price range. Exacerbating the housing crisis are local barriers to housing development (p.11)… The systemic affordable housing crisis has implications for every Salt Lake City resident and business.” Allowing this zoning change will allow for a well-designed, small home for someone wishing to find a nice place to live that’s more affordable than what average rents in SLC are currently (RentCafe.com, Zumper.com). The Transportation Equity For Salt Lake City’s Westside Study, 2021 shines a light on “Equitable Access” for west and east side Salt Lake City neighborhoods. One example of a benefit many eastside residents enjoy is the variety of several small, multi-family housing options around a major park such as Liberty Park. Additionally, you can bike or walk directly to the park from these small, multi-family options. The same opportunity around the west side’s International Peace Gardens is limited. This zoning change brings “Equitable Access” to a housing option that is in limited supply around the park today and makes it accessible via the 9 Line corridor. Impact Why R-MU?  Block face zoning is consistent. Consistency seems important since spot zoning is illegal. It seems the original intent when zoning half the block R-MU was to convert this block (along 900 South) to R-MU. Would it not otherwise be considered spot zoning since there is no other R-MU zoning near this location?  90’ physical road break. With a 90’ wide break between the east and west side of 800 West, including a 45’ city owned park-like median, it doesn’t seem we could find a better place to make a zoning break consistent with the change of the block face zoning started in 2020.  10’ extra. R-MU appears to add just 10’ to the current M-1 zoning maximum height of 65’.  Practicality naturally limits height. Some may argue that the 75’ height allowance in R-MU is too much for this lot. The reality is that these are two 0.05 acre lots and there is no physical way a 75’ building could reasonably be constructed and allow any type of reasonable parking. Additionally, anything over 30’ requires the power lines to be buried at a cost estimated to be $2.5Mil per an email quote from Scott.Burton@pacificorp.com (Mar/11, 3:45pm). Could some homes be torn down around the lot and developed into something larger? Yes. However, that misses the intent of building the “Missing Middle” on these lots, but it could be possible. If that large of an investment was made by an entity along a pedestrian-centric road with its own master plan dedicated to bringing people to use it, we’d be fortunate to welcome it as 900 South is one of the few entrances to the west side and its further development would be welcomed over the industrial neglect prevalent today.  Missing Middle - This size of lot is ideal for developing the “Missing Middle.”  12’ on the south. The property line on the south of these lots is nearly 12’ back from the sidewalk. SLC Fire requirements incentivizes owners to set a home back at least an additional 5+ feet creating almost a 17’ setback; this is the planned setback from which the owner intends to begin designing.  9’ on the west. The property line on the west is nearly 9’ back from the sidewalk. While SLC is currently evaluating reducing parking requirements, such requirements have not yet been changed. Therefore, in order to accommodate adequate packing given current requirements of the proposed R-MU zone, the owner intents to pull the building forward to be set approximately 9’ back from the sidewalk to meet the rear parking requirements. May we keep in mind that “Form” zoning approved just east a few blocks requires zero off-street parking (i.e., FB-UN2 zone for 278 West 900 South)? Why is this different than the recent rezone of 805 South 800 West to R-MU-35?  SLC made their intentions clear regarding the direction it wanted for 800 South years before the proposed zoning change for 805 S. 800 W. came along recently. Not all individual citizens/home owners sought to change the zoning of their homes to R-MU-35 along 800 South (800-900 West); that change was done by SLC or a small group getting it approved by SLC. It sent a clear message to myself as an existing owner of multiple properties along 800 West (including 804 W Genesee, separated from that zoning change by a 15’ alley) and the rest of the community since the mandate was approved by SLC offices. The clear directive was that this would be more density, limited to 35’ in height (via R-MU-35 zoning with its required parking of one car per unit).  I was the only local citizen in the room when SLC Planning Commission was reviewing the zoning change request for 805 W. 800 S. The Planning Commission indirectly invited the owner to change his proposed zoning request from R-MU-45 to R-MU-35. Those actions were consistent and appropriate since SLC had already made its intentions clear for the area (the expanded block face of I-15 to 900 W) by initiating a zoning change to R-MU-35 years ago. That owner was simply being asked to adjust his request to meet the established pattern previously set. In that meeting, he graciously complied with the informal request before leaving the room.  Similarly, SLC has approved a welcome change to R-MU zoning for 50% of the block face (700-800 W) along a future pedestrian, non-car corridor with its own master plan (the 9 Line Corridor Master Plan). Like the directional change on 800 South, the change on 900 South was set in motion years ago. The actions were clear. The message sent to local citizens was clear. The pattern of development along the respective roads was different, but made clear in the same fashion. As a resident, I read the actions and directions of SLC as a clear change to the area and purchased two lots along the same block face that was zoned R-MU. I’ve made a decision to invest and beautify this area years ago in a way that goes beyond what is “Required” (details below). I seek R-MU zoning, not R-MU-35 or 45 in its current form. What’s the impact to surrounding single-family homes and where has this been done in SLC already?  Along non-car, transit lines (i.e., the pedestrian walkway of 900 South or TRAX line on 200 South), R-MU is a sound zoning choice because it requires at least some parking; this is in comparison to the zero parking requirement of selectively used Form zoning. R-MU is a natural choice over other zoning options when existing lot lines are set back a reasonable distance from the public sidewalk. That’s the case with the corner of 900 South 800 West.  There is an example worth noting that is nearby this proposed zoning amendment, namely 900 South 200 West. Form zoning (FB-UN2) turns to R-MU zoning as you move from 900 South 200 West further south and pass a major freeway exit (the 900 South I-15 exit), shown below. Immediately after a major I-15 road, R-MU zoning is the first zoning used (1015 South 200 West) on a corner lot with multi-family units. On the other end of the block face is the same R-MU zoning (1075 South 200 West). In-between the two R-MU lots are four one-story, single-family homes which have been zoned RMF-35. In principle & use, this is almost an exact match to what is being proposed with this zoning amendment for the corner of 900 South 800 West.  It’s worth noting that at 1075 South 200 West, only 45’ separate a R-MU lot from additional one-story, single- family homes to the south. That’s half the distance of the existing 90’ between this proposed R-MU zoned corner lot of 900 South 800 West and the one-story, single-family homes to the west on 900 South. Additionally, this planned building on the corner of 900 South 800 West is a two-story building, making it fit in more seamlessly with the 900 South neighborhood.  The proposed zoning amendment would create a version of the example above; however, the 900 South 800 West lot’s building would be more appropriately sized to blend in with the existing single-family homes.  The recommended zoning for 900 South 800 West would layout similarly to other nearby non-car, pedestrian corridors (example above). R-MU (1075 S) RMF-35 RMF-35 R-MU R-MU (1015 S) M-1/TBD R-MU M-1/TBD Additional Impact All vacant land on the 900 South (700-800 West) block face is owned by two parties. One party rezoned all their vacant land to R-MU in 2020. The other party wishes to now do the same. What wasn’t changed to R-MU is still M-1 which was setup years ago before most manufacturing moved west. While there are several uses for a vacant lot in the current M-1 zone that may be potentially profitable, these don’t seem appropriate for the space. These include: a recycling collection station, a gas station, a cannabis production establishment, tire distribution center, sign painting & fabrication, 24-hour taxicab service or a dead animal cremation service center. With 50%+ of the 900 South block face (700-800 West) being rezoned to R-MU, the city’s intent to bring more mixed residential use along the 9 Line corridor is clear and consistent with the city’s long-term planning documents. While the M-1 zone allows for a hotel/motel to be built, the zoning needs to be changed for a more appropriate small, multi-family home to be allowed. It may be helpful for some to compare M-1 and R-MU zoning setbacks. As I understand them, they are as follows: M-1 has no setback requirements for the interior side yard or the rear yard. R-MU has no setback requirements for the interior side yard or the front/corner side yard. M-1 has a 15’ front & corner side yard setback M-1 has no open space requirement for a lot nor does it require any rear yards. R-MU requires 20%+ open space and a rear yard that is 25% of lot depth, but not exceeding 30’. In the end, changing 900 South 800 West’s vacant land zoning to match all other vacant land zoning on the block face is appropriate. Additionally, R-MU zoning incorporates a 20% open space requirement (currently zero open space is required in the M-1 zone) and is the best zoning for helping incorporate off-street parking into the future design. Such zoning seems appropriate since it also requires more parking than the Form zone approved a couple blocks east which requires zero off street parking. R-MU zoning for the last vacant lot on the block face is an infill decision supported by seven SLC long-term planning documents and is in harmony with SLC’s vision of sound planning. 900 South 800 West Aerial view of lot lines Looking east Looking north Proposed Site Plan: Building (blue) Parking (gray) Open space inside the lot lines exceeds 20% min (light green) Additional open space outside the lot lines (dark green) The Owner’s Proven Commitment To The Community The owner of the property believes in the restoration and enhancement of this community along 800 West. Beginning in 2017 (SLC Case#PLNZAD2017-00393), the owner started with a vacant, neglected lot (830 South 800 West). The owner and his wife designed a custom home with a goal of building a home to add a pocket of sunshine to the area. The home’s front door & much of the landscape is designed to be the color of sunshine with the goal of literally adding more sunshine to the neighborhood. Additionally, they sought to bring vintage features into a home that was designed to feel like a restored 1920’s home. This included a wood-based exterior over 100% of the home, vintage exterior lighting as well as wood floors and tile that were consistent with buildings from the early 1900’s. Lastly, it was landscaped to beautify the neighborhood and was referred to by one neighbor as the street’s “Garden of Eden.” Despite some individuals experiencing homelessness unplugging the water system to charge their cell phones, it still looks presentable and will be worked on again in 2022. Between this home and a second home (similarly built on a vacant, neglected lot at 802 West Fayette Avenue), nearly 150 trees, shrubs, bushes, grasses and flowers were installed by the hands of the owner. Besides building homes complimenting the character of the neighborhood, the owner has helped and supported other owners along 800 West prepare to improve their land. He began years ago supporting one owner of a vacant parcel at 1050 South 800 West purchase the dilapidated home (808 W. Dalton) that had become a safety issue next door. He supported the owner who then completed a lot line adjustment and he helped sell the lots to individuals who completed the teardown and are beginning the development of 808 W. Dalton. The owner noticed the neglected lots of 800 South 800 West, but when he called to begin the process to clean up that lot (805 South 800 West), it was already in-process to be cleaned up and developed. The lots on the corner of 900 South and 800 West were the last of the neglected lots on 800 West to be cleaned up. The owner and his family have begun cleaning them of trash and weeding them. Rezoning these lots is the first step towards designing a custom home that is suited to the lot, neighborhood and community. The owner has previously worked as a Research Scientist designing product, packaging, and shelf space layouts prior to taking an interest in designing custom living spaces and landscapes to enhance the quality of life. For this corner, designs are being reviewed that originate in northern Europe, Hong Kong, New York and the Salt Lake Valley with the hope of bringing design elements that compliment the neighborhood and restore beauty to a vacant, neglected corner lot. The owner is studying the use of efficient building materials and practices that would enhance life for residents and the community. Upon rezoning, the owner will engage the professional services of additional designers, architects, engineers and builders. The owner believes he can add to our community by providing a quality home in which to live. He’s currently renting to or has rented to a diverse set of people living and working right in our community including retired veterans, a member of Ballet West, a volunteer of public radio, nurses, janitors, an airline analyst, self-employed service contractors, house cleaners, and partially-disabled individuals. This zoning change allows for something to be built that will include ground-level units that may also afford some the rare chance to age in place near family. Additionally, this rezoning will offer a housing option that is disappearing since many multi-story apartment buildings are now including either parking on the first floor or commercial retail space. Thank you for time and for the opportunity to work together to bring something good to our community. Sincerely, Cameron Broadbent 4. MAILING LIST UNIT CITY STATE ZIP CODE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ST GEORGE UT 84770 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ADDRESS 817 W GENESEE AVE 813 W GENESEE AVE 2171 W 1970 NORTH CIR 801 W GENESEE AVE 854 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 866 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 822 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 816 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 810 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 872 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 1947 E STAG HILL CIR DRAPER UT 84020 10896 S 1000 E SANDY UT 84094 PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 853 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 865 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 869 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 871 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 763 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 2251 E ALVA CIR MILLCREEK UT 84109 51 E 400 S SUITE 210 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 751 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 756 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 750 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 1576 ELVADO DRWAY #6 SIMI VALLEY CA 93065 729 S KILBY CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 851 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 847 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 767 W GENESEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 3923 S 500 E MILLCREEK UT 84107 3923 S 500 E MILLCREEK UT 84107 176 N 2200 W # 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 205 HUDSON ST NEW YORK NY 10013 920 S 700 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640 OMAHA NE 68179 NAME MARIO ARTURO BALTAZAR SANCHEZ SHAUN L SIMPSON; CAROL SIMPSON (JT) ANDREW W COLE ROSENDO ZAVALA JOSE SAMUEL GRACIA; REYNA GLORIA GRACIA (JT) PATRICIO J BLANDON ADRIENNE M AMES GORDON R SOLT ANNALISA E ESQUIBEL; ALESANDRE GONZALES (TC) CHASE SOVEREEN ALAN STEVEN CURTIS MONTAGUE APTS LLC SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION NICOLE DANIELLE CURTIS MICHAEL J HOPPER; HERMELINDA G HOPPER (JT) AMANDA CLARE FERNANDEZ; JIMMY FERNANDEZ COLLEEN MAREE FECHNER CAMERON BROADBENT ARLINE STONE; TRACY BUTTERFIELD; JACOB BUTTERFIELD; IRENE MARTIN; THOMAS S SATTERFIELD; LESLIE SATTERFIELD (JT) 3148 LLC LINNUS WEGE ROSA M VEGA JESUS CHACON; RAQUEL CHAVEZ (JT) PETER R VIOLETTE; ALANA C VIOLETTE (JT) J & B PROPERTIES UTAH 2 LLC LINDA M BEDDICK LAWRENCE H IV FRAMME VANESSA CHARCAS; JOSEPH C GORMAN (JT) 855 S, A SERIES OF NORTHCREST HOLDINGS, LLC 857 S, A SERIES OF NORTHCREST HOLDINGS, LLC WEST END LLC UTAH PAPER BOX COMPANY SAN PEDRO, L A & S L RAILROAD CO Current Occupant 809 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 924 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 810 W MONTAGUE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 802 W MONTAGUE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 855 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 875 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 792 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 757 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 755 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 748 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 746 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 766 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 765 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 855 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 857 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 739 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 742 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 740 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 744 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 755 W 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 959 S 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 915 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 733 W GENESEE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Item E15 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sam Owen, Policy Analyst DATE:April 18, 2023 RE:Ordinance: Airport Title 16 Amendments MOTION 1 I move the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting. MOTION 2 I move the Council continue the public hearing. Lisa Shaffer (Mar 8, 2023 10:16 MST)03/08/2023 03/08/2023 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. ______ of 2023 2 3 (An ordinance repealing and replacing Title 16 of the Salt Lake City Code, 4 pertaining to Airports.) 5 6 WHEREAS, Salt Lake City is constructing and has begun operation of the new Salt Lake 7 City International Airport (“Airport”); and 8 WHEREAS, the aviation industry has grown and advanced in Utah, and management of 9 aviation-related operations at the Airport and other two airports owned and operated by the City, 10 has changed to accommodate such growth; and 11 WHEREAS, there have been significant market changes in aviation; and 12 WHEREAS, multiple provisions of Title 16 of Salt Lake City Code no longer align with 13 the City’s new facilities and operational needs; and 14 WHEREAS, at its March 15, 2023, meeting of the Airport Advisory Board, the Board 15 reviewed the ordinance; and 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the Salt Lake City Council has 17 determined that adopting this ordinance is in the City’s best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that: 19 SECTION 1. Title 16 of the Salt Lake City Code, regarding Airports, is hereby repealed 20 and Title 16 contained herein shall be enacted as follows: 21 TITLE 16 22 AIRPORTS 23 24 Definitions and General Regulations: 16.10 25 General Flight Regulations: 16.20 26 Commercial Aeronautical Activity; Leasing Airport Property: 16.30 27 Motor Vehicle Operations: 16.40 28 Violation, Penalty and Enforcement: 16.50 29 30 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2 CHAPTER 16.10 32 DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL REGULATIONS 33 34 16.10.010: Definitions 35 16.10.020: Purpose 36 16.10.030: Authority to Establish Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards 37 16.10.040: All Rules, Regulations, and Minimum Standards Applicable to the Airport System 38 16.10.050: Revocation of Use Privilege 39 16.10.060: Commercial Activities; Permit Requirements 40 16.10.070: Use of Airport Property; Risk and Liability; Implied Agreement 41 16.10.080: No Pre-Emption 42 16.10.090: Payment of Rents, Fees, and Charges 43 16.10.100: Customer Facility Charge 44 16.10.110: Funds, Disposition, and Accounting 45 16.10.120: Hunting and Shooting Prohibited 46 16.10.130: Use of Roadways and Walks 47 48 16.10.010: DEFINITIONS: 49 50 The following words and phrases, whenever used in this title, shall be defined as provided in this 51 title unless a different meaning is specifically or more particularly described. 52 53 ADVANCED AIRCRAFT MOBILITY SYSTEM: “Advanced Aircraft Mobility System” means 54 a system that transports individuals and property using piloted and unpiloted aircraft, including 55 electric aircraft and electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, in controlled or uncontrolled 56 airspace, and includes each component of such system. 57 58 AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITY: Any activity or service that makes possible, facilitates, is 59 related to, assists in, or is required for the operation of aircraft or another aeronautical activity 60 that contributes to or is required for the safety of such operations. The following activities, 61 without limitation, that are commonly conducted on airports are considered aeronautical 62 activities within this definition: aircraft charter, pilot training, aircraft rental, sightseeing aerial 63 photography, aerial spraying and agricultural aviation services, aerial advertising, aerial 64 surveying, air carrier operations (passenger and air cargo), aircraft sales and service, sale of 65 aviation fuel and oil, aircraft maintenance, sale of aircraft parts, and any other activity which, in 66 the sole judgement of the Department of Airports, because of its direct relationship to the 67 operation of aircraft or the Airport System, can be appropriately regarded as an aeronautical 68 activity. 69 70 AIRCRAFT: “Aircraft” means a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air. 71 See 14 CFR § 1.1. 72 73 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS: “Aircraft Operations” means an aircraft arrival at or departure from 74 the Airport System, with or without FAA airport traffic control service. 75 76 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 3 AIRPORT SYSTEM: “Airport System” means all property owned and operated by the City and 77 controlled through its Department of Airports, including the Salt Lake City International Airport, 78 and any regional or reliever airport owned by the City as applicable, as the property now exists 79 or as may hereafter be expanded or improved, together with all the appurtenant facilities, and 80 includes all areas shown in the FAA-approved airport layout plans. 81 82 AIR OPERATIONS AREA: The “Air Operations Area” (AOA) means any area of the Airport 83 System used or intended to be used for the landing, takeoff, or surface maneuvering of aircraft, 84 including all movement areas, runways, taxiways, and apron areas where aircraft are parked, 85 services, refueled, loaded with cargo, or accessed by passengers, including the areas surrounding 86 hangars, navigation equipment and communication facilities. 87 88 BUSINESS: A voluntary association formed and organized to carry on a business in the legal 89 name of the association, including, without limitation, a corporation, limited liability company, 90 partnership, or sole proprietorship. 91 92 CITY: “City” means and has reference to Salt Lake City Corporation, a municipal corporation of 93 the state of Utah. 94 95 COMMERCIAL: That which promotes or makes possible earnings, income, revenue, 96 compensation, profits, exchanges (including change of services), trading, buying, hiring, or 97 selling of commodities, goods, services, or tangible or intangible property of any kind, whether 98 such objectives are accomplished or not. 99 100 DEPARTMENT: “Department” means the Salt Lake City Department of Airports. 101 102 DIRECTOR: “Director” means the duly appointed and qualified department head of the 103 “Department of Airports,” selected and appointed by the Mayor with the recommendation of the 104 Airport Advisory Board and with the advice and consent of the City Council, or designee. 105 106 FAA: “FAA” means the Federal Aviation Administration. 107 108 FAR: “FAR” means the federal aviation regulations. 109 110 GROUND TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS: Any business operating any ground transportation 111 vehicle. 112 113 GROUND TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE: Any motor vehicle used for the transportation of 114 persons using Salt Lake City streets for commercial purposes, regardless of whether a fee or fare 115 is collected. 116 117 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: “International Airport” means the Salt Lake City International 118 Airport, as the property now exists or as may hereafter be expanded or improved, together with 119 all the appurtenant facilities, and includes all areas shown in the FAA-approved airport layout 120 plans. 121 122 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4 LANDING AREA: “Landing area” means the runways, taxiways, intermediate turnoffs, any area 123 of land utilized for an advanced air mobility system, and adjoining areas of the Airport System. 124 125 MAYOR: “Mayor” means the duly elected or appointed and qualified chief executive and 126 administrative officer of Salt Lake City, or his/her authorized representative. 127 128 MINIMUM STANDARDS: “Minimum Standards” means the standards, directives, policies, and 129 procedures for Commercial Aeronautical Activities applicable to the Airport System as adopted 130 by authority of this title. 131 132 MOTOR VEHICLE: “Motor vehicle” means any vehicle propelled by an internal combustion or 133 electric motor. 134 135 ON-AIRPORT RENTAL CAR OPERATOR: “On-Airport Rental Car Operator” means an 136 Operator occupying a rental car concession on the premises of the Airport System. 137 138 OPERATOR: Persons engaged in commercial or aeronautical activities within the Airport 139 System. 140 141 PERSON: “Person” means and includes a natural person, organization, corporation, partnership, 142 company, entity, firm, association or corporation, including any representative thereof. 143 144 RAMP: “Ramp” means a paved area of the airport normally used for the parking and taxiing of 145 aircraft. 146 147 RULES AND REGULATIONS: “Rules and Regulations” means the standards, directives, 148 policies and procedures applicable to the Airport System as adopted by authority of this title. 149 150 VEHICLE: “Vehicle” means a device in, upon or by which any Person or property is or may be 151 propelled, moved, transported, hauled, or drawn upon any roadway within the Airport System. 152 153 16.10.020: PURPOSE 154 155 This title is enacted to provide for and protect the public health, safety, interest and general 156 welfare, and to regulate the activities and the conduct of business within the Airport System, as 157 authorized by the Aeronautics Act, Utah Code Chapter 72, Title 10, or its successor. The purpose 158 of enacting this title is, within the Airport System, to ensure, safe, efficient, and adequate levels 159 of operations and services, protect against unlicensed and unauthorized products and services, 160 maintain, and enhance the availability of adequate services, promote the orderly development of 161 land, ensure the economic health of providers, and ensure the efficient use and preservation of 162 navigable airspace. 163 164 16.10.030: AUTHORITY TO ADOPT RULES AND REGULATIONS AND MINIMUM 165 STANDARDS: 166 167 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5 Subject to approval by the Mayor, and consistent with other applicable provisions of this code, 168 the Director shall have the power and authority to adopt Rules and Regulations and Minimum 169 Standards applicable to the Airport System for the following purposes: 170 171 A. To regulate the development, construction, use, occupancy, management, security, 172 control, operation, care, repair and maintenance of all land, structures and facilities within the 173 Airport System; 174 175 B. To establish and set rates, fees and charges as shall be necessary to meet the needs for 176 operating the Airport System; 177 178 C. To establish reasonable time, place and manner guidelines for the exercise of First 179 Amendment rights; 180 181 D. To regulate the operation of passenger and vehicle traffic, ground transportation and 182 Ground Transportation Businesses, and parking facilities; 183 184 E. To promote the public health, safety, interest, and general welfare; 185 186 F. To regulate all revenue producing commercial activities; 187 188 G. To restrict or prevent any activity or action that would interfere with the safe, orderly, 189 and efficient use of the Airport System by passengers, Operators, tenants, and authorized users; 190 191 H. To allow for enforcement of the Department’s Rules and Regulations and Minimum 192 Standards; 193 194 I. Any other purpose as approved by the Mayor. 195 196 16.10.040: ALL RULES, REGULATIONS AND MINIMUM STANDARDS APPLICABLE 197 TO THE AIRPORT SYSTEM: 198 199 All Persons using the Airport System, whether by permission, invitation, or license, agree to 200 comply with the Department’s Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards. No Person shall 201 commit any violation of this title, the Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards 202 promulgated hereunder, including all fire protection requirements required under applicable law 203 and this code, or any applicable federal, state, or local law while on the Airport System property. 204 205 16.10.050: REVOCATION OF USE PRIVILEGE: 206 207 Any Person trespassing on the Airport System, or refusing to comply with this title, the 208 Department’s Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards, or applicable federal, state, or 209 local law, may be directed to leave the Airport System property by a law enforcement officer, the 210 Director, or by any authorized Airport employee, and may be deprived of further use of the 211 Airport System and its facilities. Failure to comply with a direction to leave the Airport System 212 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 6 property may result in the arrest or citation of the Person for trespass under the Department’s 213 Rules and Regulations, and federal, state, and local law. 214 215 16.10.060: COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: 216 217 No Person shall use the Airport System, or any portion thereof, for any Commercial Aeronautical 218 Activity, or any business or revenue producing non-aviation commercial activity, without first 219 obtaining a written contract, permit, license, lease or other form of written authorization from the 220 Department for such activity, in compliance with any applicable Rules and Regulations and 221 Minimum Standards, and paying the established or market rates, as applicable, and charges 222 prescribed for such use. No Person not so authorized shall operate, service or repair aircraft or 223 carry on any business of any nature on the Airport System property. All commercial activities on 224 the Airport System property may be allowed at the sole discretion of the Department for the 225 purpose of promoting the best interests of the Airport System. 226 227 16.10.070: USE OF AIRPORT PROPERTY; RISK AND LIABILITY; IMPLIED 228 AGREEMENT: 229 230 Any Person causing damage of any kind to the Airport System, or its facilities or improvements, 231 shall be liable for such damage to the City. All Persons using the Airport System, whether by 232 permission, invitation or license, do so at their own risk and shall assume full responsibility for 233 their own acts and omissions, and the acts and omissions of their agents, contractors, employees, 234 guests and, and shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the City, its officers, board members, 235 departments, representatives, authorized representative(s), employees, affiliates, successors and 236 agents from liability for any loss, damage or injury resulting from their use thereof, including 237 from the claims of others arising out of their use. 238 239 16.10.080: NO PRE-EMPTION: 240 241 To the extent of any irreconcilable conflict between this title and any federal or state law, the 242 latter shall control. It is not the intent of this title to excuse any Person or Operator from the 243 performance of any obligation they may have under any agreement with the City, whether the 244 agreement is in existence at the time of adopted or entered into thereafter. Such agreements may 245 include requirements, terms or conditions in addition to or more restrictive than the provisions 246 of this title. 247 248 16.10.090: PAYMENT OF RENTS, FEES, AND CHARGES: 249 250 All Persons using the Airport System shall pay the rents, fees and charges specified by the 251 Department as applicable. Use fees, as determined by the Director, including those set forth in 252 the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, shall be imposed on users of the Airport System, 253 and may include, but is not limited to, fees for: aeronautical services, landing fees, aircraft apron 254 facilities, cargo carrier Ramp use, aircraft parking, in-flight catering, baggage claim facilities, 255 rates and charges, flight training, repair services, exclusive terminal use, and other common and 256 public use facilities. Fuel royalty fees, as determined by the Director, including those set forth in 257 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 7 the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, shall be imposed on any Person offering aviation 258 fuel for sale within the Airport System. 259 260 16.10.100: CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE: 261 262 A. A customer facility charge (CFC) shall be imposed on each rental transaction day, up to 263 and including a maximum of twelve (12) days per rental contract, for the rental of a vehicle from 264 an On-Airport Rental Car Operator. 265 266 B. The Director is authorized to implement and administer the CFC program on behalf of 267 the City, through concession and/or lease contracts or other means, including, without limitation, 268 the Department’s Rules and Regulations. CFC revenues may be pre-collected for future use, as 269 specified in this chapter. 270 271 C. On-Airport Rental Car Operators shall collect the CFC revenues which shall be held in 272 trust for the benefit of the City. CFC revenues at all times shall be property of the City and the 273 On-Airport Rental Car Operators shall have no ownership or property interest in the CFC 274 revenues. 275 276 D. On-Airport Rental Car Operators shall list the CFC as a separate line item described as 277 “customer facility charge” on all customer invoices. 278 279 E. On-Airport Rental Car Operators shall segregate, separately account for and disclose all 280 CFC revenues as trust funds in their financial statements and shall maintain adequate records to 281 account for all CFCs charged and collected. 282 283 F. On a monthly basis, On-Airport Rental Car Operators shall remit the CFC revenues 284 directly to the Department, which shall be received no later than the last day of the month 285 following the month in which the CFC charges were imposed. On-Airport Rental Car Operators 286 shall submit a monthly transaction report which includes the following: transaction days, a 287 summary of daily business transactions in connection with the Airport System, an accounting of 288 all fees charged to Airport customers in connection with such transactions, and such other 289 information as required by City. 290 291 16.10.110: FUNDS; DISPOSITION AND ACCOUNTING: 292 293 A. All funds received from fuel, taxes, rentals, concessions, customer facility charges 294 (CFCs), or any other source within the Airport System shall be placed in the airport enterprise 295 funds and kept separate and apart from all other City funds. The collection, accounting, and 296 expenditure of all airport enterprise funds shall be in accordance with existing fiscal policy of the 297 City and consistent with state and federal laws and federal grant assurances. 298 299 B. Funds received from customer facility charges (CFCs) shall be used for paying the City's 300 capital costs for construction and improvement of rental car facilities in the Airport System, 301 including costs that support environmental sustainability; paying a pro rata share of City’s costs 302 for joint use infrastructure, such as roadways, ready return and quick turnaround areas allocable 303 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8 to rental car usage; building reserves for renewal and replacement capital costs; paying common 304 costs of a shuttle bus operation for rental car customers; funding transportation costs and other 305 costs associated with interim operations during construction phasing and relocation of rental car 306 operations; paying the City’s costs for infrastructure for future lease areas for a service center, 307 including site prep; funding debt service associated with rental car facilities; or funding City’s 308 costs for such other rental car related purposes as the City determines. 309 310 16.10.120: HUNTING AND SHOOTING PROHIBITED: 311 312 There shall be no hunting or shooting on the Airport System without the express prior written 313 approval of the Director. 314 315 16.10.130: USE OF ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS: 316 317 No person shall hinder or obstruct the use of any roadway or walkway provided for vehicular or 318 pedestrian travel, or otherwise use or occupy the same except in accordance with the ordinary 319 use thereof for the particular class of traffic involved. 320 321 CHAPTER 16.20 322 GENERAL FLIGHT REGULATIONS 323 324 16.20.010: Federal, State and Local Law Applicable 325 16.20.020: Authority to Establish Landing Field 326 16.20.030: Use of Runways Required 327 328 16.20.010: FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAW APPLICABLE: 329 330 No Person shall navigate any Aircraft or conduct any Aircraft Operations on the Airport System 331 property other than in conformity with applicable federal, state, and local law, ordinances, rules 332 and regulations of any kind, including the Department’s Rules and Regulations, and Minimum 333 Standards. 334 335 16.20.020: AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH LANDING FIELD: 336 337 Unless otherwise provided by law, it is unlawful for any Person to set up or to maintain within 338 the boundary of the City any landing field or landing area for aircraft or advanced air mobility 339 system without the express written permission of the Department. Such landing field or landing 340 area must be designed and installed in accordance with FAA guidance and all applicable zoning 341 regulations, including any FAA and City permitting requirements. 342 343 16.20.030: USE OF RUNWAYS REQUIRED: 344 345 Landings and takeoffs of Aircraft shall be confined to paved runways or FAA approved landing 346 zones. 347 348 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 9 CHAPTER 16.30 349 COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITY; LEASING AIRPORT PROPERTY 350 351 16.30.010: Commercial Aeronautical Activity Requirements 352 16.30.020: Mandatory and Minimum Standard Lease Clauses 353 16.30.030: Security and Bond Requirements 354 355 16.30.010: COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS: 356 357 Any Person or Operator engaging in Commercial Aeronautical Activity on or from the Airport 358 System must comply with the applicable Minimum Standards for each specific activity and 359 paying the rates and charges prescribed for such use. No Person or Operator shall operate or 360 engage in Commercial Aeronautical Activity on or from the Airport System without complying 361 with the applicable Minimum Standards for each specific activity. 362 363 16.30.020: MANDATORY AND MINIMUM STANDARD LEASE CLAUSES; 364 CONTRACT PROVISIONS: 365 366 In addition to any other provision required under ordinance or other applicable law, all leases or 367 contracts relating to or concerning Commercial Aeronautical Activity on or from the Airport 368 System and all other easements or contracts with the Department of Airports of any kind shall 369 contain the following: 370 371 A. Federal Requirements: A lease, easement, or other agreement must include all federally 372 required contract provisions and any provisions required to comply with federal grant 373 assurances; such agreements shall be subordinate to the provisions of any existing or future 374 agreement between the City and the United States, relative to the operation and maintenance of 375 the Airport System, the execution of which has been or may be required as a condition precedent 376 to the expenditure of federal funds for the development of the Airport System. 377 378 B. Assignment of Lease: The City, in its sole discretion, may approve or deny any 379 assignment of a lease or sublease of the City-owned property at the Airport System, or of any 380 other agreement with the City. 381 382 C. Indemnification; Insurance: The Department’s current indemnification and insurance 383 requirements established under the Rules and Regulations or other Department guidelines shall 384 be included in any lease or other agreement with any contractor, sub-contractor, third party, or 385 Person contracting with the City at or related to the Airport System. 386 387 16.30.030: SECURITY AND BOND REQUIREMENTS: 388 389 Prior to the execution of a lease or other agreement and entry upon the premises or other area of 390 the Airport System, the lessee or other Person shall provide to the City a performance bond or 391 letter of credit to the Department in accordance with the Department’s Rules and Regulations 392 and other Department guidelines, acceptable to the City Attorney’s Office, which shall be held 393 by the City for the term of the lease or other agreement as security for full performance of the 394 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10 lessee’s or Person’s obligations. A lessee or other Person engaged in construction, alteration or 395 improvement on the Airport System shall require any contractor to deliver performance and 396 payment bonds as required under with the Department’s Rules and Regulations and other 397 Department guidelines, and applicable law, to the City, which are binding on the parties and that 398 shall remain in full force until such time as the contractor provides a notice of lien waiver to the 399 City. 400 401 CHAPTER 16.40 402 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS 403 404 Article I. General Regulations 405 16.40.010: Compliance with Law 406 16.40.020: Exemptions from Requirements of this Chapter 407 16.40.030: Driving Restrictions 408 16.40.040: Vehicle Ramp Operations 409 16.40.050: Common Carriers 410 16.40.060: Reporting Accidents 411 16.40.070: Prohibited Vehicles and Animals 412 16.40.080: Parking Vehicles; Impoundment Authorized 413 414 Article II. Ground Transportation Businesses 415 16.40.090: Purpose 416 16.40.100: Businesses Authorized to Provide Ground Transportation 417 16.40.110: Passenger Pick Up Zones 418 16.40.120: Ground Transportation Fees Required 419 16.40.130: City Ordinances Applicable to Airport 420 16.40.140: Staging and Parking of Ground Transportation Vehicles 421 16.40.150: Sign Requirements 422 423 16.40.010: COMPLIANCE WITH LAW: 424 425 No Person shall operate or park a Motor Vehicle on the Airport System except in strict 426 compliance with applicable federal, state, and local law, Rules and Regulations and Minimum 427 Standards. 428 429 16.40.020: EXEMPTIONS FROM REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CHAPTER: 430 431 Vehicles licensed and operated by a government agency, a university or school district, the Utah 432 transit authority, an ambulance service, and others, as may be designated in Rules and 433 Regulations, and others as may be designated by the Director, are exempt from the requirements 434 of this chapter. 435 436 16.40.030: DRIVING RESTRICTIONS: 437 438 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 11 A. Any Motor Vehicle operated on the AOA as a service vehicle shall display the 439 Department-issued identification sticker and shall also bear company identification visible from 440 fifty feet (50’) on both sides of the vehicle. 441 442 B. No Person or Vehicle is permitted in, on, or around any secured area, including but not 443 limited to, any hangar, landing field, runway, apron, taxiway, or the AOA, without prior 444 permission from the Director. 445 446 C. Motor Vehicles, trucks and other equipment (including airport maintenance and 447 emergency vehicles) operating on any landing area, runway, apron or the AOA shall display a 448 standard checkered flag or flashing amber or red light, as appropriate, if operated at night, or 449 shall be marked in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations or as authorized 450 by the Director and shall not be operated without prior permission of the control tower. 451 452 16.40.040: VEHICLE RAMP OPERATIONS: 453 454 A. Speed Limits: Motor Vehicles shall be operated on established streets and roadways 455 within the Airport System in strict compliance with posted speed limits. Motor Vehicles shall be 456 operated on the AOA, including any passenger loading ramp, aircraft parking ramp, or in any 457 area immediately adjacent to the terminals or hangars, at a safe and reasonable speed, not to 458 exceed the posted speed limit. 459 460 B. Use of Ramp Roadways: Vehicles shall be operated only within the limits of the 461 designated painted roadways on the AOA, except as required to perform aircraft servicing and 462 airfield inspections. 463 464 C. Traffic Markings on Paved Surfaces: Vehicle operators shall observe all traffic markings 465 painted on AOA pavement surfaces. 466 467 D. Yield Right-of-Way to Aircraft: All Vehicles shall yield right-of-way to any Aircraft 468 when the Aircraft is under tow or has its engines operating. No Vehicle shall proceed past such 469 Aircraft until the Vehicle's progress will not impede the Aircraft's movement. Nothing here shall 470 preclude an agreement to the contrary between the City and the Federal Aviation Administration. 471 472 16.40.050: REPORTING ACCIDENTS: 473 474 Any Person involved in an accident on the Airport System resulting in personal injury or damage 475 to property shall report the accident promptly to the Department. 476 477 16.40.060: PROHIBITED VEHICLES AND ANIMALS: 478 479 No motorized or non-motorized go-cart, scooter, skateboard, motorbike, bicycle, horse or horse 480 trailer, or similar vehicle, shall be permitted on the AOA, or hangar area without approval of the 481 Director, except for bicycles that are secured and delivered to an Aircraft for transport, or 482 motorcycles used for surface transportation in a hangar area. 483 484 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 12 16.40.070: PARKING VEHICLES; IMPOUNDMENT AUTHORIZED: 485 486 No Person shall park any Vehicle on the Airport System in violation of the Rules and 487 Regulations or posted traffic signs and markings or without payment of authorized fees. Any 488 Vehicle parked in violation of Rules and Regulations or posted traffic signs and markings may 489 be impounded or relocated in accordance with state law. The owner of any impounded Vehicle 490 shall pay for the tow charge, regular parking fees, and other penalties and related charges. 491 492 ARTICLE II. GROUND TRANSPORATION BUSINESSES 493 494 16.40.080: BUSINESSES AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE GROUND 495 TRANSPORTATION: 496 497 No Person shall operate a ground transportation vehicle on the Airport System unless it is 498 operated as part of an authorized Ground Transportation Business in accordance with title 5, 499 chapter 5.71, or successor provision. 500 501 16.40.090: PASSENGER PICK UP AND DROP OFF: 502 503 All Persons operating a Ground Transportation Vehicle on the Airport shall pick up and drop off 504 passengers only in areas as designated by the Director. Ground Transportation Vehicles may 505 occupy such area only for the period of time established by the Director. 506 507 16.40.100: GROUND TRANSPORTATION FEES REQUIRED: 508 509 No Ground Transportation Vehicle or Authorized Ground Transportation Business shall occupy 510 or use the Airport System without paying the required fees as established under this title. 511 512 16.40.110: CITY ORDINANCES APPLICABLE TO AIRPORT: 513 514 All applicable ordinances set forth in this code, including without limitation title 5 of this code, 515 or its successor, shall apply to the International Airport. With the approval of the Mayor and 516 upon notice to the City Council the Director may waive or temporarily impose restrictions not 517 addressed in this chapter or Department Rules and Regulations if it is determined that 518 circumstances in the City exist that create congestion, security concerns, emergency conditions, 519 or other operational problems, and that a temporary suspension or modification of ordinances is 520 in the best interests of the city to address such circumstances. If the City Council does not act 521 within sixty (60) days to approve or disapprove the action, then the action is deemed approved. 522 523 16.40.120: STAGING AND PARKING OF GROUND TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES: 524 525 Any use of a staging area, parking facilities, taxi stands, parking areas, traffic lanes or other areas 526 and facilities on the Airport System used by Authorized Ground Transportation Vehicles are 527 subject to Department Rules and Regulations. 528 529 16.40.130: SIGN REQUIREMENTS: 530 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 13 531 Signs may be posted at the International Airport by authorized Ground Transportation 532 Businesses in accordance with applicable City ordinances, Department contracts, and 533 Department Rules and Regulations. 534 535 CHAPTER 16.50 536 VIOLATION, PENALTY AND ENFORCEMENT 537 538 16.50.010: Prohibitive Nature of Regulations 539 16.50.020: Removal Authorized 540 16.50.030: Violation; Penalty 541 16.50.040: Issuance of a Civil Notice of Violation 542 16.50.050: Civil Penalties, Enforcement and Appeal 543 16.50.060: Enforcement Procedures; Civil Notice of Ground Transportation Violation 544 545 16.50.010: PROHIBITIVE NATURE OF REGULATIONS: 546 547 It is a violation of this title for any Person to do any act prohibited by federal, state or local law, 548 and Rules and Regulations, to fail or refuse to do any act required by law, to operate any Vehicle 549 or Aircraft in violation of any provisions of this title, Rules and Regulations or Minimum 550 Standards, or to operate any Vehicle or Aircraft unless such Vehicle or Aircraft is equipped and 551 maintained as provided in this title or other applicable law. 552 553 16.50.020: REMOVAL AUTHORIZED: 554 555 Any Person operating any Vehicle or Aircraft on the Airport System in violation of this title or 556 other applicable law, or by refusing to comply therewith, may be removed or ejected from the 557 Airport System, and may be deprived of the further use of the Airport System and its facilities 558 for such length of time as may be deemed necessary by the Director to ensure the safe, orderly 559 and efficient use of the Airport System. 560 561 16.50.030: VIOLATION; PENALTY: 562 563 Except as otherwise provided, any person guilty of violating any provision of this title shall be 564 deemed guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. 565 566 16.50.040: ISSUANCE OF A CIVIL NOTICE OF VIOLATION: 567 568 A. Every notice issued under this chapter shall be issued in the form of a written civil notice 569 and shall contain a statement that the named party may appeal the imposition of the penalty and 570 provide information regarding the process for appeal. 571 572 B. Any driver, Vehicle owner, or Person that violates any provision of this chapter may be 573 named in a civil notice issued by the City and shall be liable for a civil penalty. A violation of 574 any provision of this chapter by any driver or Vehicle owner shall also constitute a violation of 575 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 14 such provision by the business under whose authority such driver or owner was operating at the 576 time of the violation. 577 578 16.50.050: CIVIL PENALTIES, ENFORCEMENT AND APPEAL: 579 580 A. Any Person that violates this title, Department Rules and Regulations, or other applicable 581 law is subject to civil penalties and any other lawful action as may be taken by the Director to 582 ensure the safe and effective operations of the Airport System. 583 584 B. The City may revoke, suspend, or deny renewal of a City business license to operate a 585 business for violation of any provision of this title, Department Rules and Regulations, or other 586 applicable law, as provided under title 5 of this code, or successor provision. 587 588 C. Any civil penalty under this chapter may be in addition to any other penalty that may be 589 imposed by law or Department Rules and Regulations. 590 591 D. Violations of provisions of this title shall constitute civil violations and be subject to the 592 following civil penalties: 593 594 Code: Amount of Penalty: Violation: General Regulations: 16.10.060 $500.00 Commercial activities, conduct of general business; payments of rents, fees, and charges 16.10.130 $200.00 Unauthorized use of roads and walks 16.40.010 $500.00 Vehicle operations on airport 16.40.030 $1,000.00 Secured area vehicle operations 16.40.040 $1,000.00 Ramp area vehicle operations 16.40.050 $1,000.00 Failure to report accident 16.40.060 $1,000.00 Prohibited vehicle or animal in secure area 16.40.070 $200.00 Parking area restrictions/failure to pay fees 16.40.070 $100.00 Parking violation posted signs Ground Transportation Businesses: 16.40.080 $1,000.00 Unauthorized ground transportation vehicle LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 15 16.40.090 $200.00 Unauthorized passenger pickup/drop off 16.40.100 $500.00 Failure to pay fees 16.50.120 $100.00 Unauthorized staging/use of grounds and facilities 595 16.60.060: ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES; CIVIL NOTICE OF GROUND 596 TRANSPORTATION VIOLATION: 597 598 Civil notices under this title, except notice or revocation, suspension, denial or non-renewal of a 599 City business license, shall be heard in accordance with title 2, chapter 2.75 of this code, or its 600 successor. 601 602 SECTION 7. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the date of its first 603 publication. 604 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ____________, 605 2023. 606 ___________________________ 607 CHAIRPERSON 608 609 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 610 611 _____________________________ 612 CITY RECORDER 613 614 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 615 616 _____________________________ 617 Senior City Attorney 618 619 Transmitted to Mayor on ______________________. 620 621 Mayor’s Action: __________ Approved. ___________ Vetoed. 622 623 624 ____________________________ 625 MAYOR 626 627 628 629 ___________________________ 630 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 16 CITY RECORDER 631 632 633 (SEAL) 634 635 636 Bill No. ______ of 2023. 637 Published: _____________________. 638 TITLE 16 AIRPORTS Definitions 16.04 Airport Master Plan Exterior Boundaries 16.08 Airport Location And Regulations 16.12 General Flight Regulations 16.16 Traffic Pattern (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 §§ 17, 18, 19, 20, 2004) 16.20 Running Engines 16.24 Taxiing Of Aircraft 16.28 Takeoff Procedures 16.32 Landing Rules 16.36 Aircraft Parking Rules 16.40 Noise Restrictions 16.44 Fire Protection 16.48 Refueling And Defueling 16.52 Aeronautical Services; Leasing Airport Property 16.56 Motor Vehicle Operation 16.60 Violation, Penalty And Enforcement 16.64 CHAPTER 16.04 DEFINITIONS SECTION: 16.04.010: Definitions, Generally 16.04.020: Acrobatic 16.04.030: Aircraft Operations 16.04.040: Aircraft Parking Area 16.04.050: Airport 16.04.060: Airport Rules And Regulations 16.04.070: Air Traffic 16.04.080: City 16.04.090: Commercial Vehicle 16.04.100: Control Tower 16.04.110: Director 16.04.120: Doping 16.04.130: Engaging In Aerial Applications 16.04.140: Engaging In Aircraft Fuel And Oil Dispensing Service 16.04.150: Engaging In Aircraft Rental 16.04.160: Engaging In Aircraft Sales 16.04.170: Engaging In Airframe And/Or Power Plant Repair 16.04.180: Engaging In Air Transportation Service 16.04.190: Engaging In Commercial Flight Service 16.04.200: Engaging In Multiple Service 16.04.210: Engaging In Radio, Instrument Or Propeller Service 16.04.220: Engaging In Training School 16.04.230: FAA 16.04.240: FAR 16.04.250: Fixed Base Operator 16.04.260: General Aviation 16.04.270: Itinerant Operations 16.04.280: Landing Area 16.04.290: Local Aircraft Operations 16.04.300: Mayor 16.04.310: Motor Vehicle 16.04.320: Owner 16.04.330: Parking Area 16.04.340: Pedestrian 16.04.350: Person 16.04.360: Providing An Aircraft Parts House 16.04.370: Ramp 16.04.380: State 16.04.390: Traffic 16.04.400: Vehicle 16.04.410: Zones 16.04.010: DEFINITIONS, GENERALLY: The following words and phrases, whenever used in this title, shall be defined as provided in this chapter unless a different meaning is specifically or more particularly described. (Prior code § 2-1-3) 16.04.020: ACROBATIC: "Acrobatic" means maneuvers intentionally performed by an aircraft involving an abrupt change in its altitude, an abnormal altitude or an abnormal acceleration thereof. (Prior code § 2-1-4) 16.04.030: AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS: "Aircraft operations" means an aircraft arrival at or departure from the airport, with or without FAA airport traffic control service. (Prior code § 2-1-5) 16.04.040: AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA: "Aircraft parking area" means the area or areas of the airport set aside and designated for the parking of aircraft. (Prior code § 2-1-6) 16.04.050: AIRPORT: "Airport" means the city's department of airports, and all property owned or operated by the city through its department of airports, including the Salt Lake City International Airport, the Tooele Valley Airport, as they now exist or as may hereafter be expanded and exist, together with all their appurtenant facilities, and any other airport owned or operated by the city. A territorial division thereof may be designated by number. (Ord. 3-17, 2017) 16.04.060: AIRPORT RULES AND REGULATIONS: "Airport rules and regulations" means the provisions of this title, as amended, and any rules and regulations issued by the director. (Prior code § 2-1-8) 16.04.070: AIR TRAFFIC: "Air traffic" means aircraft in operation anywhere in the airspace above and on the surface of the area embraced by the airport, and normally used for the movement of aircraft. (Prior code § 2-1-9) 16.04.080: CITY: "City" means and has reference to Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah. (Prior code § 2-1-10) 16.04.090: COMMERCIAL VEHICLE: "Commercial vehicle" means a vehicle used or maintained for the transportation of persons or property for hire, compensation or profit. (Prior code § 2-1-11) 16.04.100: CONTROL TOWER: "Control tower" means the FAA air traffic control tower at Salt Lake City International Airport. Whenever used within this title, it shall refer to operations at Salt Lake City International Airport only. (Prior code § 2-1-12) 16.04.110: DIRECTOR: "Director" means the duly appointed and qualified department head of the city department designated as the "department of airports", selected and appointed by the mayor with the recommendation of the airport board and with the advice and consent of the city council. (Ord. 86-98 § 7, 1998: prior code § 2-1-13) 16.04.120: DOPING: "Doping" means the application of a preparation to strengthen and tighten aircraft fabric. (Prior code § 2-1-14) 16.04.130: ENGAGING IN AERIAL APPLICATIONS: "Engaging in aerial applications" means a person engaged in the business of aerial crop dusting, spraying or firefighting. (Prior code § 2-1-15) 16.04.140: ENGAGING IN AIRCRAFT FUEL AND OIL DISPENSING SERVICE: "Engaging in aircraft fuel and oil dispensing service" means a person engaged in the business of dispensing fuels and oil and other related services. (Prior code § 2-1-16) 16.04.150: ENGAGING IN AIRCRAFT RENTAL: "Engaging in aircraft rental" means a person engaged in the rental of aircraft. (Prior code § 2-1-17) 16.04.160: ENGAGING IN AIRCRAFT SALES: "Engaging in aircraft sales" means a person engaged in the sale of new and/or used aircraft. (Prior code § 2-1-18) 16.04.170: ENGAGING IN AIRFRAME AND/OR POWER PLANT REPAIR: "Engaging in airframe and/or power plant repair" means a person engaged in the business of repairing or servicing aircraft airframes or power plants. (Prior code § 2-1-19) 16.04.180: ENGAGING IN AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICE: "Engaging in air transportation service" means a person engaged in the transportation of a person or persons and/or property according to the applicable following conditions: A. A certified air carrier which holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under section 401 of the federal aviation act of 1958, as amended, or its successor, other than an air carrier which holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity for supplemental air service; B. A supplemental air carrier as defined in title 1, general provisions definitions, section 101(32) of the federal aviation act of 1958, as amended, or its successor; or C. An air taxi operator subject to part 298, as amended, of the economic regulations of the civil aeronautics board and engaged directly in air transportation of passengers and/or property and who does not hold a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the civil aeronautics board pursuant to section 401 of the federal aviation act of 1958, as amended, or its successor, or other economic authority issued by the civil aeronautics board. (Prior code § 2-1-20) 16.04.190: ENGAGING IN COMMERCIAL FLIGHT SERVICE: "Engaging in commercial flight service" means a person engaged in commercial air activities such as, but not limited to, banner towing, aerial advertising, aerial photography, aerial survey, firefighting, fire patrol, pipeline patrol, power line patrol, cloud/fog seeding operations, or any other operations including FAR part 135 operations. (Prior code § 2-1-23) 16.04.200: ENGAGING IN MULTIPLE SERVICE: "Engaging in multiple service" means a person engaged in two (2) or more commercial aeronautical activities. (Prior code § 2-1-21) 16.04.210: ENGAGING IN RADIO, INSTRUMENT OR PROPELLER SERVICE: "Engaging in radio, instrument or propeller service" means a person engaged in the sales and service of aircraft radios, instruments or propellers, and shall include repairs and installations of new and/or used aircraft radio equipment and parts, aircraft instruments, or propellers. (Prior code § 2-1-22) 16.04.220: ENGAGING IN TRAINING SCHOOL: "Engaging in training school" means a person engaged in conducting a pilot flight training school instruction as is necessary to prepare a student pilot to take a written examination and flight check ride for obtaining a pilot certificate or appropriate aircraft rating from the FAA. (Prior code § 2-1-24) 16.04.230: FAA: "FAA" means the federal aviation administration. (Prior code § 2-1-25) 16.04.240: FAR: "FAR" means the federal aviation regulations. (Prior code § 2-1-26) 16.04.250: FIXED BASE OPERATOR: "Fixed base operator" means a person, subject to the provisions of a lease with the city, engaging in the selling, servicing, renting or leasing of new and/or used aircraft, parts, aircraft accessories and hardware; custom repair, overhauling and modification of general accessories and hardware; overhauling and modification of aircraft and/or aircraft equipment; and includes the conducting of charter flight services, aerial photography, advertising, mapmaking, aerial firefighting or crop dusting services. (Prior code § 2-1-27) 16.04.260: GENERAL AVIATION: "General aviation" means and shall include all phases of aviation other than aircraft manufacturing, military aviation scheduled and nonscheduled, and regulated air carrier operations. (Prior code § 2-1-28) 16.04.270: ITINERANT OPERATIONS: "Itinerant operations" means all aircraft arrivals and departures other than local aircraft operations. (Prior code § 2-1-29) 16.04.280: LANDING AREA: "Landing area" means the runways, taxiways, intermediate turnoffs, and adjoining areas. (Prior code § 2-1-30) 16.04.290: LOCAL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS: "Local aircraft operations" means: A. Aircraft operating only in local traffic pattern or within sight of the tower at the airport; B. Aircraft that are known to be departing from, or arriving from, flight in local practice areas located within a twenty (20) mile radius of the control tower at the airport; and C. Aircraft making simulated instrument approaches or low passes at the airport. (Prior code § 2-1-31) 16.04.300: MAYOR: "Mayor" means the duly elected or appointed and qualified chief executive and administrative officer of Salt Lake City, or his/her authorized representative. (Prior code § 2-1-32) 16.04.310: MOTOR VEHICLE: "Motor vehicle" means any vehicle propelled by an internal combustion or electric motor. (Prior code § 2-1-33) 16.04.320: OWNER: "Owner", when referring to vehicles or aircraft, means a person who holds the legal title to any aircraft or vehicle. If such aircraft or vehicle is the subject of any agreement for the conditional sale or lease thereof with the right of purchase upon performance of the conditions stated in the agreement coupled with an immediate right of possession vested in the conditional vendee or lessee, or, in the event the mortgagor of any aircraft or vehicle is entitled to possession, then such conditional vendee, lessee or mortgagor thereof shall be deemed the owner for purposes of this title. (Prior code § 2-1-34) 16.04.330: PARKING AREA: "Parking area" means any portion of the airport which is set aside for parking of vehicles. (Prior code § 2-1-35) 16.04.340: PEDESTRIAN: "Pedestrian" means any person traveling afoot within the borders of the airport. (Prior code § 2-1-36) 16.04.350: PERSON: "Person" means and includes a natural person, copartnership, firm, association or corporation. (Prior code § 2-1-37) 16.04.360: PROVIDING AN AIRCRAFT PARTS HOUSE: "Providing an aircraft parts house" means a person engaged in the business of storing and dispensing aircraft parts. (Prior code § 2- 1-38) 16.04.370: RAMP: "Ramp" means a paved area of the airport normally used for the parking and taxiing of aircraft. (Prior code § 2-1-39) 16.04.380: STATE: "State" means and has reference to the state of Utah. (Prior code § 2-1-40) 16.04.390: TRAFFIC: "Traffic" means pedestrians and vehicles, either singly or together, while using any roadway or walkway within the airport. (Prior code § 2-1-41) 16.04.400: VEHICLE: "Vehicle" means a device in, upon or by which any person or property is or may be propelled, moved, transported, hauled or drawn upon any roadway within the airport. (Prior code § 2-1-42) 16.04.410: ZONES: A. "Bus zone" means that space reserved for loading and unloading buses. B. "Limousine zone" means that space reserved for loading and unloading limousines. C. "Loading gate" means that space reserved for loading and unloading aircraft. D. "Loading ramp" means equipment used in loading and unloading aircraft. E. "Loading zone" means that space adjacent to a curb, reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles during the loading or unloading of passengers, property or materials. F. "Taxicab stand" means the space reserved for loading and unloading taxicabs. (Prior code § 2-1-43) CHAPTER 16.08 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES SECTION: 16.08.010: Declaration Of Policy 16.08.020: Salt Lake City International Airport Boundaries 16.08.030: Salt Lake City Airport II And Tooele Valley Airport Boundaries 16.08.010: DECLARATION OF POLICY: The city council finds that: A. Aircraft transportation of all kinds is rapidly accelerating and expanding in all its fields and requires and will require increasingly larger areas for landing facilities, terminal facilities, warehouse facilities, hangar and other facilities to accommodate such transportation; B. Salt Lake City International Airport and Airport II are situated in the center of the great intermountain west, and as such will attract and serve an ever expanding aircraft transportation system and efforts are being made to increase the number of airlines using said airports; C. In order to meet the needs of the aircraft industry using such airports, it is necessary that immediate steps be taken to enlarge the airports and their facilities; D. It is necessary that the city make plans for the enlargement of the airports to provide the necessary accommodations and to protect the air space needed therefor; E. It is further necessary to adopt a master plan which will define and fix the exterior boundaries of the area necessary for the orderly and convenient expansion of such airport facilities in order to keep abreast of the needs and requirements of the air transportation industry which the airports should and will serve. (Ord. 88-86 § 12, 1986: prior code § 2-17-1) 16.08.020: SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOUNDARIES: The boundaries of the Salt Lake City International Airport shall be as set forth in the records of the Salt Lake County recorder, which may be restated in airport rules and regulations. (Ord. 77-04 § 2, 2004: Ord. 43-93 § 1, 1993: prior code § 2-17-2) 16.08.030: SALT LAKE CITY AIRPORT II AND TOOELE VALLEY AIRPORT BOUNDARIES: A. The boundaries of the Salt Lake City Airport II shall be as set forth in the records of the Salt Lake County recorder, which may be restated in airport rules and regulations. B. The boundaries of the Tooele Valley Airport shall be as set forth in the records of the Tooele County recorder, which may be restated in airport rules and regulations. (Ord. 77-04 § 3, 2004: Ord. 56-94 § 1, 1994: prior code § 2-17-3) CHAPTER 16.12 AIRPORT LOCATION AND REGULATIONS SECTION: 16.12.010: Salt Lake City International Airport 16.12.020: Salt Lake City Airport II Article I. General Regulations 16.12.030: Rules And Regulations; Adoption And Contents 16.12.040: All Regulations Applicable To The Airport 16.12.050: Use Of Airport Property; Permission Required 16.12.060: Commercial Activities; Permit Requirements 16.12.070: Conduct Of Aviation Business 16.12.080: Conduct Of General Business 16.12.090: Persons Employing Professional Skills 16.12.100: Guests Of Pilots And Operators; Responsibility 16.12.110: Users And Visitors; Risk And Liability 16.12.120: Revocation Of Use Privilege 16.12.130: Use Of Airport Facilities; Restricted Areas 16.12.140: Terminal Use Fees; Aircraft And Passenger Services 16.12.150: Terminal Use Fees; Annual Space Rental 16.12.155: Apron Use Fees; Off Airport In Flight Caterers 16.12.160: Landing Fees 16.12.170: Cargo Carrier Ramp Use Fee 16.12.180: Aircraft Parking Fees 16.12.190: Fuel Royalties 16.12.195: Customer Facility Charge 16.12.200: Funds; Disposition And Accounting 16.12.210: Repairs To Aircraft 16.12.220: Advertising Materials 16.12.225: Graphics Standards 16.12.230: Auctions And Sales 16.12.240: Commercial Photography 16.12.250: Animals 16.12.260: Firearms And Explosives 16.12.270: Roads And Walks 16.12.280: Sanitation And Littering 16.12.285: Deposit Or Leakage Of Materials Onto Airport Premises 16.12.290: Pedestrians On Runways Or Taxiways 16.12.300: Tampering With City Property 16.12.310: Flying Of Model Airplanes And Other Objects 16.12.320: Trespass And Damage To Property 16.12.325: Hunting And Shooting Prohibited 16.12.330: Abandoning Airplanes, Vehicles Or Other Property 16.12.340: Tampering With Aircraft Prohibited 16.12.350: Unlawful Entry Of Hangars Or Other Buildings 16.12.360: Liability For Damage To Airport Property Article II. Soliciting And Freedom Of Expression 16.12.370: Soliciting Or Canvassing; Prerequisites 16.12.380: Freedom Of Expression; Purpose Of Provisions 16.12.390: Permit Required; Soliciting Restrictions 16.12.400: Prohibited Conduct And Activities 16.12.410: Permit Issuance Conditions 16.12.420: Solicitation Booth Requirements 16.12.430: Apportionment Of Available Space 16.12.440: Relocation Of Activities 16.12.450: Face To Face Discussions; Conditions 16.12.460: Face To Face Discussions; Conduct Prohibited 16.12.010: SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: A. Location: Salt Lake City International Airport is four (4) miles west of the downtown business section of Salt Lake City at an elevation of four thousand two hundred twenty six feet (4,226'). B. Traffic Pattern: The normal traffic pattern for aircraft using the west runway is a rectangular path to the west of the airport. The traffic pattern for aircraft using the east runway is a rectangular path to the east of the airport. C. Altitude Restrictions: It is unlawful to operate an aircraft over the city at an altitude of less than two thousand feet (2,000') above the ground. This provision does not apply to: 1. Aircraft flying a normal traffic pattern in the process of landing at or takeoff from Salt Lake City International Airport; or 2. Flights pursuant to subsection 16.16.180A of this title; or 3. Flights under two thousand feet (2,000') authorized by the mayor in writing when there is a demonstration of need; restrictions are imposed by the mayor requiring the low altitude flight be consistent with FAR 91.79; and the filing with the city of adequate insurance or other security (approved as to form by the city attorney), sufficient to protect the city and the public. D. Runways: Salt Lake City International Airport has three (3) runways, two (2) north-south and one northwest-southeast. 1. Runway 34L-16R is a precision instrument runway and will accommodate aircraft with weights up to three hundred twenty thousand (320,000) pounds (dual tandem gear rated). 2. Runway 34R-16L is normally used by general aviation aircraft. It will accommodate aircraft with weights up to two hundred sixty thousand (260,000) pounds (dual tandem gear rated). 3. Runway 32-14 is normally used by general aviation aircraft. It will accommodate aircraft having a total weight of thirty five thousand (35,000) pounds or less. (Ord. 65-86 § 1, 1986: prior code § 2-1-1) 16.12.020: SALT LAKE CITY AIRPORT II: A. Location: Salt Lake City Airport II is eleven (11) miles south of Salt Lake City International Airport at an elevation of four thousand six hundred five feet (4,605'). It is used by general aviation aircraft only. UNICOM radio facilities, runway and taxiway lights, fixed base operator facilities, and hangars are available. B. Traffic Patterns: The traffic patterns for Salt Lake City Airport II are rectangular patterns west of the airport. C. Runways: The runway alignment at Salt Lake City Airport II is 34-16, one hundred feet by five thousand six hundred four feet (100' x 5,604'), paved and lighted. The runway will accommodate aircraft with weights of thirty five thousand (35,000) pounds or less. (Prior code § 2-1-2) ARTICLE I. GENERAL REGULATIONS 16.12.030: RULES AND REGULATIONS; ADOPTION AND CONTENTS: A. Subject to approval by the mayor, the director shall have the power and authority and is hereby empowered and authorized, upon the basis of passenger flow, security reasons or where necessitated by the peculiar character of the airport, to adopt reasonable rules and regulations pertaining to the solicitations of contributions for charitable, religious or political purposes on the airport. B. Such rules and regulations may provide for the following: 1. Conducting such activities in such manner as to maintain a free flow of pedestrians and vehicular traffic, maintain security of the airport, and avoid excessive disruption of normal activities and movement of passengers and vehicles; 2. Designating areas upon the airport in which such activities may not be conducted; 3. Determining the number of persons who may engage in such activities at any specific time and the duration of the activity. (Prior code § 2-2-14) 16.12.040: ALL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE AIRPORT: No person shall commit any violation of this code, as amended, while on the airport. For the purposes of this section, the airport shall be deemed to be a public place. (Prior code § 2-14-1) 16.12.050: USE OF AIRPORT PROPERTY; PERMISSION REQUIRED: A. Permission granted by the city or an authorized agent thereof, expressly or by implication, to enter upon or use the airport or any part thereof, including aircraft owners, operators, pilots, crew members, mechanics, servicemen and passengers, spectators, sightseers, officers and employees of airlines, agents and employees of sales agencies, flight operators, lessees and other persons occupying space at the airport, persons doing business with the airport, its lessees, sublessees and permittees and all other persons whatsoever, shall be upon an implied agreement to comply with airport rules and regulations. B. All general aviation aircraft normally based at the airport shall have such aircraft registered with a fixed base operator or the director. The registration must include type and make of aircraft, aircraft registration number, the owner's name, address and telephone number and next of kin. C. The airport management shall have the authority to take such steps as may be necessary for the handling, policing and protection of the public while present at the airport, subject to the review of the director. (Prior code § 2-2-1) 16.12.060: COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS: No person shall use the airport, or any portion thereof, for any revenue producing commercial activity without first obtaining an appropriate permit for such activity from the director and paying the rates and charges prescribed for such use. No person not so authorized shall operate, service or repair aircraft or carry on any business of any nature upon the airport premises. (Prior code § 2- 2-7) 16.12.070: CONDUCT OF AVIATION BUSINESS: Any person wishing to use the airport as a base for conducting a business in any form of commercial aviation, including building of structures, shall first make application in writing and secure permission from the director, and shall pay the fees and charges prescribed for such use. The carrying of passengers for hire or reward, including, but not limited to, air taxi, charter or rental, for the purpose of this title, is considered to be a conduct of aviation business. (Prior code § 2-2-8) 16.12.080: CONDUCT OF GENERAL BUSINESS: Any person wishing to engage in the business or concession of selling food, refreshments or any other commodity or service upon the airport or upon any land acquired by the city for use in connection with the airport, or upon or in any of the buildings, structures, land, parking places, walkways, roadways or other facilities used or operated in connection with the airport, shall make application in writing and secure permission from the director, and shall pay the fees and charges prescribed for such use. (Prior code § 2-2-9) 16.12.090: PERSONS EMPLOYING PROFESSIONAL SKILLS: Any person wishing to use the airport, its facilities and services, for the purpose of utilizing his or her professional skill or the professional skill of his or her employees for profit, shall possess all applicable licenses, shall make a written application therefor and procure permission from the director, and shall pay the fees and charges prescribed for such use. (Ord. 77-04 § 4, 2004: prior code § 2-2-10) 16.12.100: GUESTS OF PILOTS AND OPERATORS; RESPONSIBILITY: The provisions of this title shall apply to pilots, owners and operators of private aircraft and vehicles, and they shall be responsible for the observance of airport rules and regulations by persons accompanying them as their guests, invitees, students or passengers. (Prior code § 2-2-12) 16.12.110: USERS AND VISITORS; RISK AND LIABILITY: Persons visiting or using the airport and its facilities shall do so at their own risk and shall assume full responsibility for their own acts and the acts of their agents, employees, guests and invitees, and shall save and hold harmless and defend the city, its officers, employees and agents from liability for any loss, damage or injury resulting from their use thereof, and shall save and hold harmless and defend the city, its officers, employees and agents from the claims of others arising out of such use when such use is in the course of any business transaction or other matter whatsoever with such user and at the latter's request, solicitation, invitation, permission or license. (Prior code § 2-2-2) 16.12.120: REVOCATION OF USE PRIVILEGE: Any person refusing to comply with this title or airport rules and regulations may be removed from the airport upon order of the director and may be deprived of further use of the airport and its facilities. (Ord. 70-04 § 1, 2004: prior code § 2-2-3) 16.12.130: USE OF AIRPORT FACILITIES; RESTRICTED AREAS: A. Entering Posted Areas: No person shall enter any restricted area except by permission of the director, which permission shall be in the form of appropriate identification. Such identification must be worn on the left front side of the outer garment at all times a person is within any such restricted area, except when actually handling cargo/baggage, performing aircraft/equipment maintenance, or during inclement weather, when the badge must be presented upon request. No person shall use the identification of another or allow another person to use his or hers. B. Disclosure Of Confidential Information: No person may disclose confidential information regarding security to any person not authorized to have the information. This includes, but is not limited to, disclosing combinations to combination locking devices used for airport security purposes. C. Duplication Of Airport Keys: No person may duplicate keys or keying devices without permission from the director. D. Screening Requirements: No person shall be in any area beyond the screening checkpoints unless that person has been screened in compliance with federal requirements or is exempt therefrom. E. Security: No tenant or its employees shall allow or permit any person or vehicle to enter any area except that immediately controlled by the tenant unless that person or vehicle is properly escorted or badged/marked as required by security regulations. F. Perimeter Gates: No person with a gate access card shall leave a perimeter gate open after entering or exiting therethrough unless the gate is attended. (Ord. 42-87 § 1, 1987: prior code § 2-2-21) 16.12.140: TERMINAL USE FEES; AIRCRAFT AND PASSENGER SERVICES: There is imposed on any person using the passenger terminal facilities of Salt Lake City International Airport for enplaning or deplaning passengers into or from transport type aircraft the following fees for the use of aircraft apron facilities, baggage claim facilities and other common and public use facilities: A. For twenty two (22) or fewer flights in a calendar month, a use fee for the joint bag claim and other facilities will be computed as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule plus a use fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per flight. B. For more than twenty two (22) flights in a calendar month, a use fee for the joint bag claims and other facilities will be computed as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule plus a use fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule per flight for the first twenty two (22) flights. For flights in excess of twenty two (22) in a calendar month, only the use fee for the joint bag claims as computed per passenger enplaned and shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule will be imposed. C. If the international arrivals building is used, a use fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. D. For use of the executive terminal on the east side of Salt Lake City International Airport, a use fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per flight. E. Any airline having a valid and existing (not terminated or expired) agreement with the city covering the use of baggage claim and terminal facilities at Salt Lake City International Airport shall be exempt from the use fee imposed by subsections A and B of this section. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.12.150: TERMINAL USE FEES; ANNUAL SPACE RENTAL: A. There is hereby imposed on any person not having a valid and existing (not terminated or expired) agreement or permit from the city a use fee, computed by multiplying the number of square feet of space in the terminal used exclusively by any person by the annual rent rate per square foot of space in the terminal as is from time to time being charged commercial airlines in accordance with the formula in exhibit C, part I(b) of the airport use agreement dated July 1, 1978, and designated by the algebraic symbol "RM". B. The annual rental rate for basement and baggage make up space shall be charged in the above manner at the rate of 0.5 RM. Payment of said use fee or acceptance of payment of said use fee shall not be construed as creating any type of tenancy whatsoever or as authorizing the continued use or occupancy of such space. (Prior code § 2-2-27) 16.12.155: APRON USE FEES; OFF AIRPORT IN FLIGHT CATERERS: A. There is imposed upon any person engaging in food and beverage in flight catering services at the airport whose business premises is at a location other than on the airport, a fee for use of the aircraft apron or parking area and related facilities and other common and public use facilities at the airport. B. The fee for such use shall be seven percent (7%) of such person's gross sales at the airport. Within fifteen (15) days of the end of each month such person shall provide an audited statement to the director or his designee showing such person's actual gross receipts for sales at the airport, accompanied by a check for said percentage of gross sales. City shall have the right to audit such person's records, concerning such sales, at any time during normal business hours. C. Any person who fails to comply with the foregoing may be prohibited from obtaining access to the airport apron or parking area and related facilities. D. "Engaging in food and beverage in flight catering services" means a person engaged in the business of preparing food and beverages and using or supplying such to others for use at or on aircraft flights from the airport. (Ord. 76-90 § 1, 1990) 16.12.160: LANDING FEES: A. Computation: There is hereby imposed on every operator engaged in the business of transporting by air persons or property for hire, including, but not limited to, travel clubs, common carriers, contract carriers, foreign air carriers and charter operators, a landing fee for each aircraft (fixed wing) landing made at Salt Lake City International Airport. The landing fee shall be computed by multiplying the landing fee rate, as amended from time to time and charged to commercial airlines in accordance with the formula in exhibit C, part I(a) of the airport use agreement with participating air carriers dated July 1, 1978, by the number of thousands of pounds, or fraction thereof, of certified maximum gross landing weight, as defined in the federal air regulations, of the aircraft, whether the aircraft is actually in revenue service or not. B. Exemptions: 1. Any air carrier that has a valid and existing (not terminated or expired) airport use agreement with the city providing for the payment of landing fees for use of Salt Lake City International Airport shall be exempt from the landing fee imposed by this section. 2. Any such operator that is a fixed base operator based at Salt Lake City International Airport and operates a charter or air taxi service on a request basis shall, unless such operator has a valid and existing agreement with the city providing for the payment of landing fees as established by ordinance, be exempt from the landing fee imposed by this section. C. Helicopters: There is hereby imposed on every operator, not otherwise exempt, of a helicopter for the carriage of persons or property for hire for a landing fee for each helicopter landing made at Salt Lake City International Airport as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per landing, regardless of weight. D. Landing Defined: The term "landing" as used in this section means and includes all landings, whether revenue or nonrevenue. The foregoing notwithstanding, the term "landing", for purposes of landing fee computation, shall not include the situation where an aircraft departs from the Salt Lake City International Airport for another destination and, without making a stop at another airport, said aircraft is forced to return to and land at Salt Lake City International Airport because of meteorological conditions, mechanical or operating causes, or for similar emergency or precautionary reasons. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.12.170: CARGO CARRIER RAMP USE FEE: A. Imposed: There are hereby imposed on every operator, engaged in the business of transporting property by air for hire, cargo carrier ramp use fees for each separate use of the cargo ramp facility at Salt Lake City International Airport. The cargo carrier ramp use fee shall be computed on an annual basis by the city, for each fiscal year, first determining the cost of: 1. Investment by the city for construction of the ramp; 2. Associated site development costs; 3. Administrative and maintenance costs; 4. A percentage equal to two percent (2%) of the total costs as outlined above representing the city's return on this investment. B. Cost Formula: The investment costs associated with the ramp shall be amortized over a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of determining a yearly investment cost at an interest rate equal to the rate charged participating airlines for city investment as detailed in the airport use agreements. The city shall then take the sum of the yearly investment cost, the cost of administration and maintenance, and the percentage return on city investment, and shall allocate them as follows: 1. Thirty five percent (35%) of total yearly cost to aircraft usage; 2. Sixty five percent (65%) of total yearly cost to gross weight. C. Fee Determination: After these costs are allocated, fees to be charged to aircraft using the facilities shall be determined as follows: 1. The amount determined in subsection B1 of this section shall be divided by the total number of aircraft utilizing the cargo ramp facilities in the prior year to determine a flat rate fee to be charged to each aircraft per use. 2. The amount determined in subsection B2 of this section shall be divided by the total gross certified landing weight of aircraft utilizing the cargo ramp in the prior year to establish a basic rate per one thousand (1,000) pounds, or fraction thereof, of maximum gross certified landing weight and shall be charged according to each aircraft per use. D. Payment: Bills shall be submitted to the airline on a monthly basis and shall be payable within thirty (30) days of day of receipt. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.12.180: AIRCRAFT PARKING FEES: A. There are established the following classes of fees for the parking of aircraft at the Salt Lake City International Airport: 1. Monthly parking fees for airport based aircraft on airport controlled space, as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. 2. Daily transient aircraft parking fees on airport controlled space, as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. B. Any person engaging in air transportation services having an assigned gatehold shall be exempt from all parking fees in this section. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.12.190: FUEL ROYALTIES: A. There is imposed upon any person offering aviation fuel for sale upon the airport the following royalties: 1. A fuel royalty equal to six cents ($0.06) per gallon of fuel delivered to any person at the airport. B. Any person selling fuel at the airport shall, on or before the twelfth day of each month submit to the city a detailed statement showing all fuel delivered to such person during the preceding calendar month. The city shall then bill such person for the preceding calendar month, taking into account the customary shrinkage allowance of two percent (2%). Such bill shall be paid within ten (10) days of the receipt thereof from the city. C. Any person required to and paying a landing fee imposed by section 16.12.160 of this chapter, or its successor, or required by an existing agreement shall be exempt from the provisions of this section. (Ord. 28-96 § 1, 1996: Ord. 68-90 § 1, 1990: prior code § 2-2-28) 16.12.195: CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE: A. There is hereby imposed a customer facility charge (CFC) on each transaction day, up to and including a maximum of twelve (12) days per contract, for the rental of a vehicle from an on airport rental car company (airport rental car company). B. The executive director of the Salt Lake City department of airports or designee is authorized to implement and administer the CFC program on behalf of the city, through concession and/or lease contracts or other means, including, without limitation, the rules and regulations of the airport. The CFC charges may be precollected for future use, as specified in section 16.12.200 of this chapter. C. The CFC shall not exceed five dollars ($5.00) per transaction day during the first year following the effective date. Thereafter, the method of calculating the CFC and the amount of such CFC shall be determined by the executive director of the Salt Lake City department of airports on behalf of the city. However, the CFC shall not exceed ten dollars ($10.00) per transaction day. City may at any time and for any reason, change the amount of the CFC or discontinue it upon written notice to any affected airport rental car company. D. The airport rental car company shall collect the CFC and shall hold the CFC in trust for the benefit of the city. The CFC at all times shall be property of the city and the airport rental car company shall have no ownership or property interest in the CFC. The airport rental car company shall segregate, separately account for and disclose all CFCs as trust funds in its financial statements, and shall maintain adequate records that account for all CFCs charged and collected. E. Airport rental car companies shall list the CFC separately on its customer invoice, describing it as a "customer facility charge". F. The airport rental car company shall remit directly to the Salt Lake City department of airports on a monthly basis all CFCs that were collected or should have been collected from its airport customers. The CFCs shall be received no later than the last day of the month following the month in which the CFCs were collected. G. The airport rental car company shall submit to the Salt Lake City department of airports on a monthly basis a transaction report, which includes transaction days, a summary of daily business transactions in connection with the airport, an accounting of all fees charged to airport customers in connection with such transactions, and such other information as required by city in form and substance satisfactory to the Salt Lake City department of airports. (Ord. 9-11, 2011) 16.12.200: FUNDS; DISPOSITION AND ACCOUNTING: A. All funds received from fuel, taxes, rentals, concessions, customer facility charges, or any other source by the airport shall be placed in the airport enterprise funds and kept separate and apart from all other city funds. The collection, accounting, and expenditure of all airport funds shall be in accordance with existing fiscal policy of the city. B. Funds received from customer facility charges shall be used for paying the city's capital costs for construction and improvement of rental car facilities at the airport, including costs that support environmental sustainability; paying a pro rata share of city's costs for joint use infrastructure, such as roadways, ready return and quick turnaround areas allocable to rental car usage; building reserves for renewal and replacement capital costs; paying common costs of a shuttle bus operation for rental car customers; funding transportation costs and other costs associated with interim operations during construction phasing and relocation of rental car operations; paying the city's costs for infrastructure for future lease areas for service center, including site prep; funding debt service associated with rental car facilities; or funding city's costs for such other rental car related purpose as the city determines. (Ord. 9-11, 2011) 16.12.210: REPAIRS TO AIRCRAFT: A. No aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller or appliance shall be repaired in any area of the airport other than that area specifically designated or approved by the director. The director has designated that a person who properly leases an enclosed hangar at the airport may make or cause to be made necessary repairs, maintenance and inspections that are required by federal aviation regulations to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition when the same are not otherwise prohibited by this title, but only for the aircraft listed in the lease. B. No repair will be made on any aircraft in a hangar other than that aircraft normally assigned to that hangar. Corporate aircraft maintenance hangars or areas, however, are considered as designated repair areas for maintenance on their own corporate aircraft. C. All repairs on aircraft are to be made by properly certified mechanics, except those items of "preventive maintenance" performed by the owner or operator in accordance with the provisions of FAR, part 43. D. Items of preventive maintenance may be performed in tiedown areas. (Ord. 77-04 § 5, 2004: prior code § 2-2-22) 16.12.220: ADVERTISING MATERIALS: No person shall post, distribute or display signs, advertisements, circulars, printed material or written matter at the airport, without the written permission of the director. This section shall not apply when such distribution or displays are for religious, charitable or political purposes, which events shall be controlled by all other applicable provisions. (Ord. 88-86 § 8, 1986: prior code § 2-2-15) 16.12.225: GRAPHICS STANDARDS: No person shall knowingly violate airport graphics standards as they shall be established and changed from time to time by the director. (Ord. 42-87 § 11, 1987: prior code § 2-19-19) 16.12.230: AUCTIONS AND SALES: There shall be no auctions or other special sales held on any airport property without the prior consent of, and in the manner prescribed by, the director. (Prior code § 2-2-23) 16.12.240: COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY: No person shall take still, motion or sound pictures at the airport for commercial purposes without the permission of the director. (Prior code § 2-2-16) 16.12.250: ANIMALS: Animals may be permitted at the airport if controlled by a leash or other means which will secure the control thereof by the owner or person in charge of the same. No person shall bring an animal to the airport except under complete control. No person while at the airport shall allow any animal to escape from such person's control. Any person bringing an animal to the airport agrees to indemnify fully, defend and save and hold harmless the city, its officers, agents and employees from and against all losses, damages, claims, liabilities and causes of action of every kind or character and nature, as well as costs and fees, including reasonable attorney fees connected therewith and expenses of the investigation thereof, based upon or arising out of damages or injuries to third persons or their property caused by the negligence of such person. The city shall give to such person prompt and reasonable written notice of any such claim or action and such person shall have the right to investigate, compromise and defend the same to the extent of his or her own interest. (Ord. 77-04 § 6, 2004: Ord. 88-86 § 9, 1986: prior code § 2-2-18) 16.12.260: FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES: No person, except authorized peace officers, post office, customs, express and air carrier employees, members of the armed forces of the United States or members of the national guard, on official duty, shall carry any loaded or unloaded firearm, explosive, ammunition or other dangerous weapon or device except an unloaded firearm or ammunition being transported in a private aircraft in a manner that complies with law, or being delivered for shipment by an air carrier directly to the air freight office or the airline ticket counter in compliance with law. (Ord. 77-04 § 7, 2004: Ord. 42-87 § 6, 1987: prior code § 2-14-3) 16.12.270: ROADS AND WALKS: No person shall hinder or obstruct the use of any roadway or walkway provided for vehicular or pedestrian travel, or otherwise use or occupy the same except in accordance with the ordinary use thereof for the particular class of traffic involved. (Prior code § 2-2-17) 16.12.280: SANITATION AND LITTERING: No person shall drop, throw or otherwise release or permit to be released upon the airport premises any garbage, paper, refuse, cans, building materials, rags, litter or other waste material, except in proper receptacles. (Prior code § 2-14-2) 16.12.285: DEPOSIT OR LEAKAGE OF MATERIALS ONTO AIRPORT PREMISES: A. No person shall discard or deposit any glass, nails, wire, cans, rocks or gravel, or any other substance or material on the airport. Any such discards or deposits shall be removed at such person's expense. B. No vehicle shall be driven or moved upon the airport unless such vehicle is so constructed, loaded and/or covered so as to prevent its contents from dropping, sifting, leaking or otherwise escaping therefrom. (Ord. 42-87 § 7, 1987: prior code § 2-14-8) 16.12.290: PEDESTRIANS ON RUNWAYS OR TAXIWAYS: Pedestrian traffic in any form is strictly forbidden on runways, taxiways and across ramps between concourses. Exceptions may be granted by the director, in writing. (Ord. 42-87 § 1, 1987: prior code § 2-2-24) 16.12.300: TAMPERING WITH CITY PROPERTY: No person shall interfere or tamper with any property of the city at the airport or ride, drive or park any vehicle or walk upon any portion of the airport not intended for such use without authorization from the director. (Prior code § 2-2-6) 16.12.310: FLYING OF MODEL AIRPLANES AND OTHER OBJECTS: No person shall fly any model airplane, kite, model rocket, balloon, or other airborne device on the airport or controlled properties without the express prior written approval of the director. (Ord. 77-04 § 8, 2004: prior code § 2-14-7) 16.12.320: TRESPASS AND DAMAGE TO PROPERTY: No person shall: A. Destroy, damage, deface or disturb in any way any building, sign, equipment, marker or other structure, tree, flower, lawn or other public property on the airport; B. Trespass on any airport property or within any building on airport property; C. Interfere or tamper with or damage any part of the airport or any equipment thereof; D. No unauthorized person shall interfere or tamper with any aircraft or start the engine of any aircraft. (Prior code § 2-14-5) 16.12.325: HUNTING AND SHOOTING PROHIBITED: There shall be no hunting or shooting on the airport, its related or controlled properties without the express prior written approval of the director. (Prior code § 2-14-6) 16.12.330: ABANDONING AIRPLANES, VEHICLES OR OTHER PROPERTY: No person shall park and abandon any airplane, boat, trailer, automobile, truck or other personal property within the limits of the airport. Vehicles and personal property of any nature shall be removed from the airport premises immediately upon request of the director. (Prior code § 2-14-4) 16.12.340: TAMPERING WITH AIRCRAFT PROHIBITED: No person shall enter, climb upon or tamper with any aircraft without permission of the proper authority, or commit any act which would endanger an aircraft landing at, taxiing on or taking off from the airport. (Prior code § 2-2-5) 16.12.350: UNLAWFUL ENTRY OF HANGARS OR OTHER BUILDINGS: No person shall enter any hangar or portion of any building occupied by any person under a lease or license from the city without consent of such licensee. However, this section does not abrogate the city's right to enter any leased hangar or building as provided in any of the city's written lease agreements, or city authority of law. (Prior code § 2-2-4) 16.12.360: LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO AIRPORT PROPERTY: A. Any person causing damage of any kind to the airport, or any of the fixtures thereof, shall be liable for such damage to the city. Damage to field lighting or other airport facilities shall be paid for by the owner of the aircraft or vehicle involved or by the operator or pilot responsible therefor. B. Any damage to any of the physical property on the airport, its related and/or controlled properties, shall be reported immediately to the director. (Prior code § 2-2-11) ARTICLE II. SOLICITING AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 16.12.370: SOLICITING OR CANVASSING; PREREQUISITES: Soliciting or canvassing by any person for any purpose whatsoever shall be prohibited within the airport, its buildings and facilities, unless written permission is obtained from the director. If an information card required by title 5, chapter 5.66 of this code is presented to the director, the director shall grant permission to conduct the solicitations at the airport, provided the information cardholder agrees to abide by reasonable rules and regulations adopted by the director as authorized by section 16.12.030 of this chapter, or its successor. (Ord. 88-86 § 7, 1986: prior code § 2-2-13) 16.12.380: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION; PURPOSE OF PROVISIONS: The regulations hereinafter set out are hereby declared to be necessary for the accomplishment of the following purposes: A. To ensure that persons seeking to exercise constitutional freedoms of expression can communicate effectively with users of the airport; B. To ensure adequate nearby police facilities for the protection of persons exercising their constitutional freedoms; C. To restrict such activities to public areas of airport buildings and premises; D. To protect persons using the airport from repeated communications or encounters which might constitute harassment or intimidation; E. To ensure the free and orderly flow of pedestrian traffic through the airport premises; F. To ensure that only nonprofit charitable, political or religious organizations are permitted to solicit funds on the airport premises; G. To ensure that properly authorized persons, groups and organizations seeking to solicit funds have adequate exposure to the traveling public; and H. To restrict such solicitation of funds to public areas of airport buildings and premises. (Prior code § 2-2-29) 16.12.390: PERMIT REQUIRED; SOLICITING RESTRICTIONS: Any person, group or organization desiring to engage in solicitation of funds at any airport owned by the city, which solicitation involves the exercise of activities which are constitutionally protected, including, but not limited to, the distribution of noncommercial, nonobscene or any other goods of whatever nature, in conjunction with a request for a donation, the sale of any such literature or other goods, or the mere solicitation of funds, shall be allowed to engage in such activity provided that the following conditions are met: A. Such solicitation does not result in interference with the transportation function of the airport; B. The solicitation does not constitute a commercial activity; C. Such person, group or organization shall have first secured the information card required by title 5, chapter 5.66 of this code, or its successor, and D. The person, group or organization desiring to solicit funds at the airport shall first obtain a written permit therefor from the director. For purposes of obtaining such permit, there shall be submitted to the director a written application setting forth the following: 1. The full name, mailing address and telephone number of the person, group or organization sponsoring, promoting or conducting the solicitation, 2. The full name, mailing address and telephone number of the individual person or persons who will have supervision of and responsibility for the proposed solicitation, 3. The purpose of the proposed solicitation, 4. The dates and hours during which the solicitation is proposed to be carried out, and the expected duration of the proposed solicitation, and 5. The number of persons proposed to be engaged in such solicitation. (Ord. 88-86 § 10, 1986: prior code § 2-2-30) 16.12.400: PROHIBITED CONDUCT AND ACTIVITIES: In the solicitation of funds, the following requirements shall apply: A. No sound or voice amplifying apparatus or noisemaking devices shall be used; B. No sign or printed matter shall be attached to any "solicitation booth", except such as may be necessary to identify the organization which is conducting the solicitation, and any such sign must conform with the airport decor and signing scheme; C. No person soliciting funds shall in any way indicate to the public that he or she is a representative of the city or the city's airports; D. Funds shall neither be demanded nor required in return for written material or other items such as flowers or candy which are proffered to the general public as "free", "gifts", or "gratuities"; and E. The solicitations referred to herein shall be conducted strictly in conformity with the terms and conditions of these regulations, and of title 5, chapter 5.66 of this code, and all other applicable laws and ordinances. (Ord. 86-98 § 9, 1998: prior code § 2-2-31) 16.12.410: PERMIT ISSUANCE CONDITIONS: Upon receipt of an application containing information as described in subsection 16.12.390D of this chapter, or its successor, the director shall forthwith issue a permit to the applicant if there is space available in the airport terminal, applying only the limitations and regulations set forth in the ordinances set out herein. The director shall exercise no judgment regarding the purpose or content of the proposed activity, and shall exercise no discretion over the issuance of a permit hereunder, except as provided in such ordinances, it being the intent of these ordinances that the issuance of a permit by the director under this section shall be a routine clerical and ministerial function. In no event, however, shall the director issue a permit for a period of time in excess of thirty (30) days. (Prior code § 2-2-32) 16.12.420: SOLICITATION BOOTH REQUIREMENTS: Each permit issued by the director shall specify, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinances codified herein, the areas in which the proposed solicitation booth shall be located; provided, however, that such location shall provide reasonable access to the general public. Solicitations shall be conducted only from a solicitation booth which shall be furnished by the director. Such booth shall be located within the permissible areas at such points as may be designated from time to time by the director. (Prior code § 2-2- 33) 16.12.430: APPORTIONMENT OF AVAILABLE SPACE: A. In the event that two (2) or more persons, groups, or organizations seek to conduct the activities described herein at the same time, the director shall apportion the available areas between them or among them on as equitable a basis as possible. B. In no event, however, shall more than three (3) persons be engaged in any solicitations permitted by these rules and regulations in any one area at the same time. C. When the director receives more applications for permits than the director is able to grant by following this rule, permits shall be granted on a first come first serve basis and the director may impose such reasonable and equitable restrictions as to allowable dates, hours or numbers of participants as may reasonably be required to provide, as much as possible, fair and equal opportunities for all applicants, while ensuring the efficient and effective operation of the transportation function of the airport. (Prior code § 2-2-35) 16.12.440: RELOCATION OF ACTIVITIES: The director may move such permitted activities from one area to another upon reasonable written notice to the permit holder when such move or moves are necessary for the efficient and effective operation of the transportation function of the airport. Such move, however, shall not unreasonably interfere with the permittee's access to the general public. (Prior code § 2-2-34) 16.12.450: FACE TO FACE DISCUSSIONS; CONDITIONS: The foregoing regulations shall not prevent or prohibit any person, group or organization from communicating their views in face to face discussions at locations in the airport other than the solicitations booth. Such communications, however, shall be conducted only in or upon those premises which are nonsecured, public use areas. Further, under no circumstances shall the same be conducted: A. Beyond the security checkpoints through which passengers and visitors are required to pass when moving toward aircraft gate positions; i.e., on the side of the security checkpoints where the gate positions of arriving and departing aircraft are located; B. In any areas reserved for particular uses, such as parking areas, restroom facilities, restaurants, ticket counters or baggage claim areas; C. Within ten feet (10') of any area leased exclusively to a tenant of the airport; D. Within thirty feet (30') of any security checkpoint; or E. Within ten feet (10') of any stairwell, elevator, enclosed concession, any holding areas within the airport concourses or any doors of general public circulation. (Amended during 1/88 supplement: prior code § 2-2-36) 16.12.460: FACE TO FACE DISCUSSIONS; CONDUCT PROHIBITED: In conducting any face to face discussion or in an attempt to engage any person or persons in such discussions, no person shall: A. In any way obstruct, delay or interfere with the free movement of any other person, seek to coerce or physically disturb any other person, or hamper or impede the conduct of any authorized business at the airport; B. Use any sound or voice amplifying apparatus on the premises of the airport; C. Receive or accept any donation of money (but may direct to a location established under section 16.12.420 of this chapter, or its successor, any person wishing to make such a donation) except at a solicitation booth; D. Use any noisemaking device; E. In any way indicate to the public that he or she is a representative of the city, or the city's airports; F. Misrepresent his or her identity; or G. In any manner disrupt the orderly business of the airport. (Ord. 86-98 § 10, 1998: prior code § 2-2-37) CHAPTER 16.16 GENERAL FLIGHT REGULATIONS SECTION: 16.16.010: Federal, State And Local Regulations Applicable 16.16.020: Pilots; U.S. Airman's Certificate Required 16.16.030: Aircraft; U.S. Registration Required 16.16.040: Commercial Flight Prerequisites 16.16.050: Armed Forces Personnel And Aircraft 16.16.060: Aircraft Owner Responsibilities 16.16.070: Landing Field Establishment Conditions 16.16.080: Traffic Rules For Flight Operations 16.16.090: Control Tower 16.16.100: Radio Communications (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 9, 2004) 16.16.110: Knowledge Of Field Rules Required 16.16.120: Airport Beacon Lighted During Daylight Hours; IFR (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 10, 2004) 16.16.130: Servicing Equipment 16.16.140: Portable Equipment Must Be Secured 16.16.150: Exceeding Airport Weight Limits Prohibited 16.16.160: Holding Or Boarding On Runways Prohibited 16.16.170: Flight Over The City; Restrictions 16.16.180: Flight Over The City; Minimum Altitude 16.16.190: Demonstration Flights And Ground Displays 16.16.200: Aerobatics Restrictions 16.16.210: Reckless Aircraft Operation; Penalty 16.16.220: Repairing Aircraft On Landing Area Prohibited 16.16.230: Accident Report Requirements 16.16.240: Damage By Aircraft; Responsibility 16.16.250: Damage By Aircraft; Lien For Payment Of Costs 16.16.260: Damaged Aircraft; Removal Responsibility 16.16.270: Tail Skids Prohibited (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 14, 2004) 16.16.280: Dropping Objects From Aircraft 16.16.290: Jumping Or Permitting Jumping From Aircraft 16.16.300: Skydiving 16.16.310: Gliders, Balloons And Similar Vehicles Prohibited 16.16.320: Ultralight Vehicles 16.16.010: FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE: No person shall navigate any aircraft, land aircraft upon, fly aircraft from or conduct any aircraft operations on or from the airport other than in conformity with pertinent federal, state and city laws and rules and regulations. (Prior code § 2-3-1) 16.16.020: PILOTS; U.S. AIRMAN'S CERTIFICATE REQUIRED: It is unlawful for any person to pilot within the city any civil aircraft unless such person is the holder of a currently effective pilot certificate issued by the government of the United States, but this restriction shall not apply to any person certificated by a foreign country with which the United States has a reciprocal agreement. (Prior code § 2-3-2) 16.16.030: AIRCRAFT; U.S. REGISTRATION REQUIRED: It is unlawful for any person to land upon or fly any aircraft from the airport unless there is prominently displayed in such aircraft a current certificate of registration and a currently effective certificate of airworthiness issued by the FAA, but this restriction shall not apply to any aircraft certificated by a foreign country with which the United States has a reciprocal agreement. (Prior code § 2-3-3) 16.16.040: COMMERCIAL FLIGHT PREREQUISITES: It is unlawful for any person to carry passengers for hire or reward in any aircraft unless such person has been certificated by the FAA as a commercial pilot, and it is unlawful for any person to pilot any aircraft in a commercial flight which does not qualify under requirements of the FAA for transportation of persons or property for hire or reward. (Prior code § 2-3-4) 16.16.050: ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL AND AIRCRAFT: All officers and members of the armed forces of the United States, either active or reserve, while engaged in the service of the United States and all aircraft owned by and/or operated exclusively under direction of the armed forces shall be subject to the provisions contained in this chapter except as to certification of aircraft and airmen. (Prior code § 2-3-5) 16.16.060: AIRCRAFT OWNER RESPONSIBILITIES: No aircraft owner or operator shall lease to another or otherwise permit any person to operate any aircraft on or within the limits of the airport until such owner or operator has assured himself or herself that: A. The lessee or permittee has in his/her possession a currently effective pilot certificate qualifying him/her to operate the particular aircraft involved, or a student pilot certificate properly endorsed for the flight involved; B. The pilot has in his/her possession a currently effective medical certificate; and C. The pilot has an understanding and working knowledge of FAA airport traffic control procedure, airport rules and regulations, and the use of aircraft radio. (Prior code § 2-3-11) 16.16.070: LANDING FIELD ESTABLISHMENT CONDITIONS: It is unlawful for any person to set up or to maintain within the limits of the city any landing field for aircraft without special permission first obtained from the mayor in writing. (Prior code § 2-3-17) 16.16.080: TRAFFIC RULES FOR FLIGHT OPERATIONS: In addition to FAR 91, the traffic rules set out in this chapter shall govern flight operations at the airport. (Prior code § 2-4-1) 16.16.090: CONTROL TOWER: Air and ground traffic shall be under the direction of the control tower when operating within the movement area at Salt Lake City International Airport. All instructions to personnel of aircraft and vehicular traffic shall be transmitted by radio or by flashing light gun signals. (Prior code § 2-4-3) 16.16.100: RADIO COMMUNICATIONS: (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 9, 2004) 16.16.110: KNOWLEDGE OF FIELD RULES REQUIRED: All pilots and student pilots shall learn and have a working knowledge of airport field rules, traffic patterns, and practice and restricted areas of the city and the near vicinity thereof. (Prior code § 2-3-12) 16.16.120: AIRPORT BEACON LIGHTED DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS; IFR: (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 10, 2004) 16.16.130: SERVICING EQUIPMENT: The director shall authorize and designate the placement and parking of all aircraft servicing equipment of the airlines and other aircraft on the airport. (Prior code § 2-4-4) 16.16.140: PORTABLE EQUIPMENT MUST BE SECURED: Portable loading ramps, baggage trucks and other such portable equipment shall be equipped with brakes, or if not so equipped, shall be secured by suitable locking devices when not in use. (Prior code § 2-9-5) 16.16.150: EXCEEDING AIRPORT WEIGHT LIMITS PROHIBITED: No person shall land, take off or taxi an aircraft on the ramps, runways and taxiways of the airport with a gross weight in excess of the design limits for such ramps, runways and taxiways, or in excess of such weight limitations as the director may from time to time establish and publish in the "FAA Airport Facility Directory". (Ord. 77-04 § 11, 2004: prior code § 2-4-2) 16.16.160: HOLDING OR BOARDING ON RUNWAYS PROHIBITED: No person shall board or disembark from any aircraft on the landing or takeoff area except in case of an emergency, nor shall any aircraft hold on a runway or landing strip while instructors are coaching students. Instructors shall not solo students except from the end of runways and in so doing shall clear the runway before disembarking from aircraft. (Prior code § 2-9-1) 16.16.170: FLIGHT OVER THE CITY; RESTRICTIONS: Persons flying any aircraft within the limits of the city or the airport shall operate the same as to cause a minimum of noise and inconvenience and shall not endanger property or the lives of others. (Prior code § 2-3-14) 16.16.180: FLIGHT OVER THE CITY; MINIMUM ALTITUDE: A. General Restrictions: Except as directed by FAA air traffic control, aircraft flown over residential or business areas of the city shall comply with minimum altitude as specified in regulations promulgated by the federal aviation administration. B. Exemption For Flying Reindeer On Christmas Eve: On Christmas Eve only, flying reindeer and any cargo they may be towing shall be exempt from the provisions of subsection A of this section. (Ord. 77-04 § 12, 2004: Ord. 92-85 § 1, 1985: prior code §§ 2-3- 8, 2-3-8(e)) 16.16.190: DEMONSTRATION FLIGHTS AND GROUND DISPLAYS: A. No flight or ground demonstrations shall be conducted on the airport without the express written approval of the director. B. This shall not apply to aircraft sales demonstrations. (Ord. 77-04 § 13, 2004: prior code § 2-3-20) 16.16.200: AEROBATICS RESTRICTIONS: It is unlawful for any person to aerobatically fly an aircraft: A. Over any business, industrial or residential area of the city; B. Over any open air assembly of persons within the corporate limits of the city; or C. Within the corporate limits of the city while carrying passengers for hire or reward. (Prior code § 2-3-16) 16.16.210: RECKLESS AIRCRAFT OPERATION; PENALTY: Any person who manifests a wilful disregard for the safety of persons or property may, after providing reasonable notice to such person and opportunity for hearing on the matter, be denied the use of the airport. If such disregard is due to any violation of airport rules and regulations or regulations in force and effect of the state or the FAA, denial of use of the airport may be for such period of time as in the discretion of the director is deemed advisable. (Prior code § 2-3-13) 16.16.220: REPAIRING AIRCRAFT ON LANDING AREA PROHIBITED: No person having charge or control of an aircraft shall permit the same to remain unnecessarily on any part of the landing or takeoff area for the purpose of repairs. (Prior code § 2-9-2) 16.16.230: ACCIDENT REPORT REQUIREMENTS: A. When, within the limits of the airport, death or injury to persons or damage to aircraft or other property results from collision, mishaps or accident involving any aircraft, or in or around any aircraft, a report shall be made immediately by the pilot or the registered owner to the FAA district safety office, the Utah state division of aeronautics, and to the director, stating the make and registration number of the aircraft, the time and place of the accident, and giving such other information as may be required in approved accident reports. B. In the event of an accident occurring on the airport involving any aircraft, no vehicle or personnel will be permitted on the landing areas without the express approval of the airport management and/or the control tower. Aircraft in the air will continue to circle or land, wind permitting, on an unobstructed runway as directed by the control tower. (Prior code § 2-3-7) 16.16.240: DAMAGE BY AIRCRAFT; RESPONSIBILITY: Any person who operates an aircraft in a negligent manner resulting in damage to airport equipment or buildings shall be required to reimburse the city for such damages. (Prior code § 2-3-19) 16.16.250: DAMAGE BY AIRCRAFT; LIEN FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS: The director may claim a mechanic's lien and hold any aircraft until all fees and charges for materials, labor and damages to airport property have been paid. (Prior code § 2-9-4) 16.16.260: DAMAGED AIRCRAFT; REMOVAL RESPONSIBILITY: Every aircraft owner, pilot and agent, severally, shall be responsible for the prompt removal of wrecked aircraft, together with such debris as may be resulted therefrom, as soon as permitted by FAA regulations. Care shall be used so as not to damage airport property. (Prior code § 2-9-3) 16.16.270: TAIL SKIDS PROHIBITED: (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 14, 2004) 16.16.280: DROPPING OBJECTS FROM AIRCRAFT: It is unlawful to drop any material, object or refuse from an aircraft while taxiing upon the airport or while in flight within the limits of the airport or the city unless prior permission has been obtained in writing from the FAA, the Utah state aeronautics commission and the mayor. (Prior code § 2-3-9) 16.16.290: JUMPING OR PERMITTING JUMPING FROM AIRCRAFT: A. Except in case of emergency, it is unlawful for any person aboard an aircraft in flight to jump from such aircraft at any point over the corporate limits of the city, or to land within the corporate limits of the city from an aircraft in flight, whether the jump therefrom is made within or outside the corporate limits without having first obtained permission from the mayor in writing. B. Except in case of emergency, it is unlawful for the pilot or other persons in charge of an aircraft in flight to permit any person aboard to jump therefrom over the corporate limits of the city without such person having first obtained permission from the mayor in writing. (Prior code § 2-3-10) 16.16.300: SKYDIVING: Skydiving operations shall not be conducted on or in the immediate vicinity of the airport without the prior written permission of the director. (Ord. 80-86 § 1, 1986: prior code § 2-3-22) 16.16.310: GLIDERS, BALLOONS AND SIMILAR VEHICLES PROHIBITED: No gliders, hang gliders, heligliders, hot air balloons and similar aircraft like vehicles shall be operated on or from Salt Lake City International Airport or Salt Lake City Airport II. (Ord. 77-04 § 15, 2004: prior code § 2-3-21) 16.16.320: ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES: Ultralight vehicles, as defined in 14 code of federal regulations section 103.1 or any successor thereto, shall be prohibited from operating at the Salt Lake City International Airport or Salt Lake City Airport II. (Ord. 77-04 § 16, 2004: Ord. 42-87 § 3, 1987: prior code § 2-3-23) CHAPTER 16.20 TRAFFIC PATTERN (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 §§ 17, 18, 19, 20, 2004) CHAPTER 16.24 RUNNING ENGINES SECTION: 16.24.010: Airport Employee Safety Precautions 16.24.020: Starting Engines (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 21, 2004) 16.24.030: Runup Of Jet Or Jet Prop Engines (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 22, 2004) 16.24.040: Runup Areas 16.24.050: Running Engines In Hangars Prohibited 16.24.010: AIRPORT EMPLOYEE SAFETY PRECAUTIONS: Persons employed at the airport shall observe every precaution for their own safety when in the vicinity of turning propellers or jet engines and it shall be their duty to warn others of inherent dangers. (Prior code § 2-11-5) 16.24.020: STARTING ENGINES: (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 21, 2004) 16.24.030: RUNUP OF JET OR JET PROP ENGINES: (Rep. by Ord. 77-04 § 22, 2004) 16.24.040: RUNUP AREAS: Aircraft engines shall be run up only in the areas designated by the director or the control tower. The aircraft shall be so placed that hangars, shops, groups of persons and other aircraft will not be in the path of the propeller stream or the blast from jet engines. The aircraft shall also be so placed that noise from such engine runup will not unreasonably inconvenience others. (Prior code § 2-11-3) 16.24.050: RUNNING ENGINES IN HANGARS PROHIBITED: No person shall start an aircraft engine or run it while in a hangar. (Prior code § 2-11-2) CHAPTER 16.28 TAXIING OF AIRCRAFT SECTION: 16.28.010: Standards; FAR Rules Applicable 16.28.020: Care And Safety Precautions 16.28.030: Clearance At Ramps And Terminal Areas 16.28.040: Crossing Runways 16.28.050: Passing Other Aircraft 16.28.060: Areas For Taxiing Or Towing 16.28.070: Taxiing In And Out Of Hangars 16.28.080: Jet And Prop Jet Powered Aircraft 16.28.010: STANDARDS; FAR RULES APPLICABLE: All aircraft shall be governed by the standard FAR-91 rules of taxiing and by the provisions of the following sections. (Prior code § 2- 5-1) 16.28.020: CARE AND SAFETY PRECAUTIONS: Aircraft shall be taxied carefully, having due regard for the safety of other aircraft, vehicles and persons. (Prior code § 2-5-3) 16.28.030: CLEARANCE AT RAMPS AND TERMINAL AREAS: Persons taxiing past aircraft parked on ramps or in front of the terminal buildings shall use extreme caution. Adequate clearance shall be given when passing other aircraft, vehicles or persons. (Prior code § 2-5-2) 16.28.040: CROSSING RUNWAYS: Aircraft, vehicles and pedestrians shall not cross any runway or taxiway at Salt Lake City International Airport until clearance by the control tower has been received. (Ord. 1-06 § 31, 2006: Ord. 77-04 § 23, 2004: prior code § 2-5-4) 16.28.050: PASSING OTHER AIRCRAFT: Aircraft may pass other aircraft at Salt Lake City International Airport while taxiing only if cleared to do so by the control tower. (Prior code § 2-5-5) 16.28.060: AREAS FOR TAXIING OR TOWING: No aircraft shall be taxied or towed on any area, other than the areas normally used for operation of aircraft, without the express prior written approval of the director. (Prior code § 2-5-8) 16.28.070: TAXIING IN AND OUT OF HANGARS: No aircraft shall be moved into or out of any hangar with an engine running. (Prior code § 2-5-6) 16.28.080: JET AND PROP JET POWERED AIRCRAFT: No jet or prop jet aircraft shall be taxied on the airport where the exhaust blast is likely to cause injury to persons or damage to property, runways, aprons or taxi strips. If it is impossible to taxi aircraft without causing such damage, engines must be shut down and the aircraft towed to its destination. (Prior code § 2-5-7) CHAPTER 16.32 TAKEOFF PROCEDURES SECTION: 16.32.010: Standards; FAR Rules Applicable 16.32.020: Tower Clearance Required 16.32.030: Manned Balloons; Launch Site Requirements 16.32.010: STANDARDS; FAR RULES APPLICABLE: All aircraft shall be governed by the standard FAR-91 rules for takeoff and by the provisions of the following sections of this chapter. (Prior code § 2-6-1) 16.32.020: TOWER CLEARANCE REQUIRED: Takeoff at Salt Lake City International Airport shall not be commenced until clearance has been received from the control tower. (Prior code § 2-6-2) 16.32.030: MANNED BALLOONS; LAUNCH SITE REQUIREMENTS: It is unlawful for any person to launch any manned balloon or other similar aircraft within the corporate limits of the city, except at a launch site which meets the following requirements: A. The launch site is sufficiently large and open so that nothing will be contacted by the balloon upon takeoff; B. The terrain is suitable for such operations; C. The launch must not interfere with the safe operation of any of the city's airports. (Ord. 77-04 § 32, 2004: prior code § 2-6-11) CHAPTER 16.36 LANDING RULES SECTION: 16.36.010: Standards; FAR Rules Applicable 16.36.020: Use Of Runways Required 16.36.030: Passing Aircraft While Landing Prohibited 16.36.010: STANDARDS; FAR RULES APPLICABLE: All persons piloting or flying aircraft shall be governed by the standard FAR-91 rules for landing in addition to the following provisions set out in this chapter. (Prior code § 2-8-1) 16.36.020: USE OF RUNWAYS REQUIRED: Landings and takeoffs will be confined to paved runways. (Ord. 77-04 § 35, 2004: prior code § 2-8-7) 16.36.030: PASSING AIRCRAFT WHILE LANDING PROHIBITED: No person shall land, maneuver or operate an aircraft in such a manner as to pass, or impair, restrict or impede the movement of, another aircraft. (Ord. 77-04 § 39, 2004: prior code § 2-8-6) CHAPTER 16.40 AIRCRAFT PARKING RULES SECTION: 16.40.010: Areas For Parking 16.40.020: Parking On Apron 16.40.030: Airline Parking Positions 16.40.040: Air Taxi And Transient Parking 16.40.050: Securing Of Unattended Aircraft 16.40.060: Owner Responsible For Securing Aircraft 16.40.070: Orderly Parking; Cleanliness Of Area 16.40.080: Payment Of Rates And Charges Required 16.40.090: Violations; Impounding Of Aircraft 16.40.010: AREAS FOR PARKING: No person shall park any aircraft in any area on the airport other than that prescribed by the director. (Prior code § 2-10-1) 16.40.020: PARKING ON APRON: Aircraft shall be parked only on painted parking spots designated for that use. (Prior code § 2-10-4) 16.40.030: AIRLINE PARKING POSITIONS: No person shall park any aircraft on the airline parking positions for a period longer than that agreed to by the airline having jurisdiction over the position. No person shall park any aircraft so as to interfere with the proper use of airline equipment on the airline parking positions. (Prior code § 2-10-5) 16.40.040: AIR TAXI AND TRANSIENT PARKING: Aircraft parking for air taxi and transient aircraft desiring to park at the city's airports may only do so in the areas designated by the department of airports as being provided for that purpose. (Ord. 77-04 § 40, 2004: prior code § 2-10-6) 16.40.050: SECURING OF UNATTENDED AIRCRAFT: No person shall leave an aircraft unattended unless within a hangar or otherwise properly tied or secured. Owners shall assume the risk of damage to their own aircraft and shall be liable for any injury to persons or damage to others' property caused by their negligence in permitting the movement of their aircraft when attended or unattended. (Prior code § 2-10-2) 16.40.060: OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING AIRCRAFT: It shall be the duty of aircraft owners and operators to securely fasten their airplanes in a manner that prevents harm or damage. (Ord. 77-04 § 41, 2004: prior code § 2-10-3) 16.40.070: ORDERLY PARKING; CLEANLINESS OF AREA: Each operator and attendant shall be responsible for the orderly parking of aircraft in the area adjacent to his or her hangar or hangars and for the cleanliness of the area he or she uses. (Prior code § 2-10-7) 16.40.080: PAYMENT OF RATES AND CHARGES REQUIRED: It is unlawful for any person to park an aircraft in any area designated for parking without paying the prescribed rates and charges for such parking. (Prior code § 2-10-8) 16.40.090: VIOLATIONS; IMPOUNDING OF AIRCRAFT: Any aircraft parked in violation of this chapter may be impounded by the director. Such aircraft shall not be released except upon payment by the owner, pilot or operator of such aircraft of a fee in the amount of fifteen dollars ($15.00) for the cost of impound, together with the parking fee then due and all storage and towing charges reasonably resulting from such impounding to the time of payment of all fees and release of the aircraft. The impounding of an aircraft shall not prevent or preclude the institution and prosecution of criminal proceedings in the circuit court or elsewhere against the owner or operator of such impounded aircraft. (Prior code § 2-10-9) CHAPTER 16.44 NOISE RESTRICTIONS SECTION: 16.44.010: Definitions 16.44.020: Airport Use Restrictions 16.44.010: DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this chapter the following definitions shall apply: AIRPLANE: Any civil, subsonic turbojet powered airplane exceeding seventy five thousand (75,000) pounds in maximum certificated takeoff weight. STAGE 1 AIRPLANE: An airplane that does not meet the stage 2 or 3 noise levels prescribed in section C36.5(a)(2) or C36.5(a)(3) of appendix C of federal aviation regulations part 36, or its successor. STAGE 2 AIRPLANE: An airplane that complies with the noise levels prescribed in section C36.5(a)(2) of appendix C of federal aviation regulations part 36 (including use of the applicable tradeoff provisions). STAGE 3 AIRPLANE: An airplane that complies with the noise levels prescribed in section C36.5(a)(3) of appendix C of federal aviation regulations part 36 (including use of the applicable tradeoff provisions). (Ord. 77-04 § 42, 2004: prior code § 2-20-1) 16.44.020: AIRPORT USE RESTRICTIONS: No airplane may take off or land at Salt Lake City International Airport unless it is a stage 2 or 3 airplane. Any noise compliant airplane, however, may continue to operate at the airport. (Prior code § 2-20-2) CHAPTER 16.48 FIRE PROTECTION SECTION: 16.48.010: Fire Prevention Responsibility 16.48.020: Fire Extinguisher Requirements 16.48.030: Smoking Limitations 16.48.040: Heating And Fuel Burning Equipment 16.48.050: Floors To Be Free Of Flammable Material 16.48.060: Waste Receptacle Requirements 16.48.070: Fuel And Flammable Liquid Storage 16.48.080: Lubricating Oil Storage 16.48.090: Leaking Fuel Or Oil 16.48.100: Cleaning Of Aircraft 16.48.110: Painting And Doping Of Aircraft 16.48.120: Welding And Similar Operations 16.48.130: Open Flame Operations 16.48.140: Heating Of Oil 16.48.150: Storage Of Materials 16.48.160: Accumulation Of Litter Prohibited 16.48.170: Motor Vehicles In Hangars Prohibited 16.48.180: Alarmed Fire Escape Doors 16.48.010: FIRE PREVENTION RESPONSIBILITY: Every person using the airport or its facilities in any way shall use the utmost caution to prevent fire. (Prior code § 2-13-1) 16.48.020: FIRE EXTINGUISHER REQUIREMENTS: Every building on the airport and every repair shop, doping or welding room shall be equipped with adequate fire extinguishers and first aid equipment approved by the city fire marshal. Such extinguishers and equipment shall be maintained in first class working condition at all times and it shall be the duty of the director to designate some person to examine the same and report their condition to the director as frequently as the director shall require. (Prior code § 2-13-13) 16.48.030: SMOKING LIMITATIONS: Smoking shall be prohibited in those areas of airport buildings where no smoking signs are posted. (Prior code § 2-13-2) 16.48.040: HEATING AND FUEL BURNING EQUIPMENT: All heating equipment and fuel burning appliances installed in any structure shall be in accordance with the provisions of this code relating to such installation. (Prior code § 2-13-6) 16.48.050: FLOORS TO BE FREE OF FLAMMABLE MATERIAL: All lessees shall keep the floors of hangars, shops, storerooms, aprons and areas adjacent thereto leased by them, free of all grease, waste or other flammable material. (Prior code § 2-13-10) 16.48.060: WASTE RECEPTACLE REQUIREMENTS: Metal receptacles with self-closing covers shall be provided for the disposal of oil waste, rags and other rubbish, and the contents thereof shall be removed at least daily. (Prior code § 2-13-11) 16.48.070: FUEL AND FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE: Aircraft fuel and other flammable liquids shall be stored in accordance with the requirements of this code relating to fire and fire prevention, including, but not limited to, the provisions of title 18 of this code, as amended. (Prior code § 2-13-3) 16.48.080: LUBRICATING OIL STORAGE: No person shall keep or store lubricating oils in or about the hangars unless stored in closed containers. (Prior code § 2-13-16) 16.48.090: LEAKING FUEL OR OIL: No person shall keep any aircraft stored in a hangar or tied down on any ramp, without providing for the containing of leaking fuel or oil. Repairs of any damage resulting from failure to observe proper containment of such leaks shall be made at the expense of the aircraft owner. (Prior code § 2-13-17) 16.48.100: CLEANING OF AIRCRAFT: No person shall use flammable and/or volatile materials in the cleaning of any aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller or appliance unless such cleaning operations are conducted in open areas, as designated outside buildings and a safe distance from the same or other aircraft, or in a room specifically set aside for that purpose, which room must be properly fireproofed and equipped with adequate and readily accessible fire extinguishing apparatus. (Prior code § 2-13-5) 16.48.110: PAINTING AND DOPING OF AIRCRAFT: Painting and doping is prohibited except in rooms adequately ventilated and approved by the city fire marshal. The doping and/or painting of aircraft, or parts thereof, shall not be permitted in any aircraft parking area, taxiway, shade hangar, or T-hangar. (Prior code § 2-13-4) 16.48.120: WELDING AND SIMILAR OPERATIONS: No welding operations, nor the use of any appliance with an open flame or highly heated part shall be allowed except in shop space designated for such purpose by the director. (Prior code § 2-13-8) 16.48.130: OPEN FLAME OPERATIONS: No person shall conduct any open flame operations in any hangar or building, or part thereof, unless specifically authorized by the director. (Prior code § 2-13-15) 16.48.140: HEATING OF OIL: No person shall heat oil in any manner except with steam, hot water, hot air or electric heaters. (Prior code § 2-13-7) 16.48.150: STORAGE OF MATERIALS: No person shall store or stock material or equipment in such a manner as to constitute a fire hazard. (Prior code § 2-13-14) 16.48.160: ACCUMULATION OF LITTER PROHIBITED: No boxes, crates, rubbish, paper or other litter shall be permitted to accumulate in, about or around any hangar, and all oil, paint and varnish cans, bottles or other containers shall be removed from the hangar immediately upon being emptied. (Prior code § 2-13-12) 16.48.170: MOTOR VEHICLES IN HANGARS PROHIBITED: Except as provided in section 12.56.240 of this code, or its successor, no automobile or other motor vehicle shall be driven into or allowed to remain inside any hangar ordinarily used for the storage or parking of aircraft for hire or reward except when necessary for some operation requiring its entrance therein, or as set forth in section 16.60.065 of this title. A hangar, or portion of a hangar, set aside and ordinarily used as a repair shop, however, is exempted from this provision. (Ord. 77-04 § 44, 2004: prior code § 2-13-9) 16.48.180: ALARMED FIRE ESCAPE DOORS: No person may enter or exit through or activate any alarmed emergency fire escape door for other than its intended use without the prior permission of the director. (Ord. 42-87 § 2, 1987: prior code § 2-2-39) CHAPTER 16.52 REFUELING AND DEFUELING SECTION: 16.52.010: Aircraft Refueling; Required Procedures 16.52.020: Aircraft Refueling; Authorized Dispensers 16.52.030: Fuel And Fueling Dispensers; Authorized Operations Only 16.52.035: Self-Fueling 16.52.040: Fire Extinguisher Requirements 16.52.050: Grounding; Required When 16.52.060: Grounding; Specific Equipment 16.52.070: Maintenance Of Fueling Equipment 16.52.080: Jet Fuel Dispensing Operations 16.52.090: Refueling Measurement Equipment 16.52.100: Smoking Prohibited 16.52.110: Attendant Required When Passengers In Aircraft 16.52.120: Refueling In Buildings Prohibited 16.52.130: Refueling Or Defueling Prohibited When 16.52.140: Operating Electrical Equipment Prohibited When 16.52.150: Starting Engines Prohibited When Gasoline On Ground 16.52.160: Prevention Of Fuel Overflow 16.52.170: Refueling Vehicles; Parking Restrictions 16.52.180: Washing Aircraft With Petroleum Products 16.52.190: Dumping Of Oil Prohibited 16.52.010: AIRCRAFT REFUELING; REQUIRED PROCEDURES: The refueling of all aircraft and vehicles shall be accomplished only by use of fuel trucks or pumps and pits approved by the director. Fueling equipment shall meet National Fire Prevention Association standards. Any other refueling procedures require prior written permission from the director. (Ord. 42-87 § 4, 1987: prior code § 2-12-2) 16.52.020: AIRCRAFT REFUELING; AUTHORIZED DISPENSERS: No aircraft shall be refueled except by fuel dispenser authorized by the director. (Prior code § 2-12-1) 16.52.030: FUEL AND FUELING DISPENSERS; AUTHORIZED OPERATIONS ONLY: A. Except as set forth in this section, only those persons or businesses having valid written lease agreements for commercial flight operations at the airport shall be allowed to have fueling dispensers on their leased premises. All such facilities shall comply with all laws and regulations relating thereto, and the director shall approve the location and construction of all such facilities. B. Fuel which is delivered to the airport for the purpose of storage or resale on airport premises shall only be delivered to facilities located in an area which has been designated by the director as a fuel farm. C. Any persons or businesses owning or having a valid written lease agreement for hangar space at the airport but which are not authorized to perform commercial flight operations at the airport shall be allowed to have fueling dispensers on their premises for storage purposes only, and not for delivery or resale purposes or any other purposes, if such persons or businesses own or lease a single hangar having an area of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more. All such facilities shall comply with all laws and regulations relating thereto, and the director shall approve the location and construction of all such facilities. (Ord. 18-93 § 1, 1993: prior code § 2-12-19) 16.52.035: SELF-FUELING: Aircraft owners or pilots desiring to conduct self-fueling operations shall notify the director in writing, obtain a written permit from the airport and comply with the terms thereof. (Ord. 42-87 § 5, 1987: prior code § 2-12-20) 16.52.040: FIRE EXTINGUISHER REQUIREMENTS: Adequate fire extinguishers shall be kept within easy reach of all fueling and draining operations. (Prior code § 2-12-15) 16.52.050: GROUNDING; REQUIRED WHEN: During period of fueling, refueling or defueling of any aircraft, the aircraft and fuel dispensing or draining apparatus shall be properly grounded to a point or points of zero electrical potential to prevent ignition of volatile gases by static electricity. (Prior code § 2-12-6) 16.52.060: GROUNDING; SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT: All hoses, funnels and appurtenances used in fueling and draining operations shall be properly equipped with a grounding device. (Prior code § 2-12-11) 16.52.070: MAINTENANCE OF FUELING EQUIPMENT: Fueling and defueling equipment, including hoses, valves, nozzles and such other equipment as may be used, shall be maintained in a safe operating and nonleaking condition. (Prior code § 2-12-10) 16.52.080: JET FUEL DISPENSING OPERATIONS: Jet fuel dispensing operations shall provide for the recirculation of the fuel prior to and during delivery of fuel to the aircraft. (Prior code § 2-12-16) 16.52.090: REFUELING MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT: All refueling vehicles shall be equipped with functioning refueling measurement equipment. (Prior code § 2-12-12) 16.52.100: SMOKING PROHIBITED: No smoking shall be permitted within fifty feet (50') of a refueling truck or within fifty feet (50') of an aircraft fuel tank while such aircraft is being refueled or defueled. (Prior code § 2-12-4) 16.52.110: ATTENDANT REQUIRED WHEN PASSENGERS IN AIRCRAFT: During the refueling or defueling of any aircraft, no passenger or passengers shall be permitted in such aircraft unless a cabin attendant is stationed at or near the cabin door. (Prior code § 2-12-5) 16.52.120: REFUELING IN BUILDINGS PROHIBITED: There shall be no fueling operations conducted in any building on the airport. (Prior code § 2-12-13) 16.52.130: REFUELING OR DEFUELING PROHIBITED WHEN: No aircraft shall be refueled or defueled while the aircraft engine is running or while such aircraft is in a hangar or other enclosed place, or while being warmed by the application of external heat. (Prior code § 2-12-3) 16.52.140: OPERATING ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PROHIBITED WHEN: During fuel handling in or about any aircraft, no person shall operate any radio transmitter or receiver, or shall switch electrical appliances off or on in such aircraft. (Prior code § 2-12-8) 16.52.150: STARTING ENGINES PROHIBITED WHEN GASOLINE ON GROUND: No person shall start the engine of any aircraft whenever gasoline is on the ground or pavement thereunder. When gasoline is spilled or leaks from gasoline equipment or from aircraft, those persons in charge thereof shall immediately notify the airport fire department. (Prior code § 2-12-9) 16.52.160: PREVENTION OF FUEL OVERFLOW: Persons engaged in aircraft fuel handling shall exercise care to prevent overflow of fuel. (Prior code § 2-12-7) 16.52.170: REFUELING VEHICLES; PARKING RESTRICTIONS: Refueling vehicles shall be parked in areas approved by the director and at least fifty feet (50') from other aircraft and buildings except when actively fueling. (Ord. 77-04 § 45, 2004: prior code § 2-12-14) 16.52.180: WASHING AIRCRAFT WITH PETROLEUM PRODUCTS: If petroleum products are used in the washing of aircraft, such washing shall be done only in those areas designated for such purpose. (Prior code § 2-12-17) 16.52.190: DUMPING OF OIL PROHIBITED: Persons changing oil in their own aircraft shall not dump drained or surplus oil upon the surface of the ground on airport property, or into storm drains. (Prior code § 2-12-18) CHAPTER 16.56 AERONAUTICAL SERVICES; LEASING AIRPORT PROPERTY SECTION: 16.56.010: Aeronautical Service Business Requirements 16.56.020: Mandatory And Minimum Standard Lease Clauses 16.56.030: Lease Proposal Requirements 16.56.040: Bond Requirements 16.56.050: Miscellaneous Businesses; Annual Fee 16.56.060: Aerial Application Operations 16.56.070: Aircraft Fuel And Oil Dispensing Services 16.56.080: Aircraft Parts House 16.56.090: Aircraft Rental 16.56.100: Aircraft Sales 16.56.110: Airframe And/Or Power Plant Repair 16.56.120: Air Transportation Service 16.56.130: Commercial Flight Service 16.56.140: Complete Fixed Base Operation 16.56.150: Flight Training 16.56.160: Flying Club Regulations 16.56.170: Radio, Instrument Or Propeller Repair Service 16.56.180: Multiple Services 16.56.010: AERONAUTICAL SERVICE BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS: A. Any person desiring to perform aeronautical services at or from the airport must submit to the director, prior to commencing any operation, information satisfactory to the director that the prospective tenant meets the minimum standards established herein for engaging in such business on the airport. B. The applicant shall submit to the director a verified statement, including a complete summary of the general nature of the applicant's general aviation operation, and if an individual, his/her name and address, or if a partnership, the names and addresses of all the partners, or if a corporation, association or organization, the names of the president, vice president, secretary, and full time managing officer or managing employee. C. Any person operating as a fixed base operation shall require all employees to participate in fire, rescue or other emergency training conducted by the city fire department on a schedule convenient to both parties. D. All personnel of lessee are required to hold FAA certificates and ratings and must maintain such certificates and ratings. E. Any person offering any services, or combinations thereof, shall do so under written lease or permit agreement with the city. In the event services are provided under a permit agreement, the following shall apply: 1. Such permit will be issued for a period of one year. In the event the permit is abandoned by the holder, or is canceled by the director: a) for failure to comply with the airport rules and regulations, or the directives issued pursuant thereto, or b) for violation of any of the provisions of this title, as amended, there shall be no refund of permit fees previously paid or accrued. 2. Employees of fixed base operators or others operating under contract with the city, which contracts allow the contracting party to perform such services, shall not be required to obtain the permit provided for by this section in order to perform services on behalf of such contracting party. 3. The permit holder shall maintain and keep available for inspection by the director, at reasonable times and places, in accurate form, such permanent written records as may be necessary to show the nature of services performed pursuant to such permit, when, where and for whom the services were performed and the charge therefor. The permit holder shall submit to the director, not less than every six (6) months, a statement of the charges made during the preceding six (6) months, for the services performed pursuant to such permit. 4. The permit holder shall meet such other qualifications as may from time to time be established by the director, and shall conduct the services for which the permit is issued without discrimination and in accordance with the airport rules and regulations. 5. The permit holder shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the city from any and all claims of liability for personal injury, death, or property damage resulting from permittee's operation at the airport. Any and all permits shall contain language similar to that required of leasehold operations as stated in section 16.56.020 of this chapter, or its successor. 6. All permit holders shall comply with the airport rules and regulations. 7. All permit holders shall obtain and keep current the appropriate license or licenses as required by the city, county, state and federal authorities to engage in the business or activities conducted by such holders. 8. The director may cancel any permit for failure of the permittee to comply with the airport rules and regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto or this title, as amended. A permit shall be canceled only after reasonable notice to the permittee and an opportunity to be heard by the airport board's general aviation subcommittee, whose decision shall be final. (Ord. 86-98, 1998: prior code § 2-19-1) 16.56.020: MANDATORY AND MINIMUM STANDARD LEASE CLAUSES: The following minimum standards for leasehold operations at the airport shall include therein the building codes, as adopted in this code, and the state and the appropriate API standards for the handling of aviation fuels. All leases concerning aeronautical services at the airport shall contain the following provisions: A. Fair Operation: The lessee agrees to operate the premises leased for the use and benefit of the public and to furnish such service on a fair, equal and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory prices for each unit or service. The lessee, however, may be allowed to make reasonable and nondiscriminatory discounts, rebates or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. B. Compliance Requirements: The lessee, for himself/herself, and for his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest and assigns, as part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree, as a covenant running with the land, that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained or otherwise operated on the property described in this lease for a purpose for which a department of transportation program or activity is extended, or for any other purpose involving the provision of a similar service or benefit, a lessee shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to title 49, code of federal regulations, department of transportation, subtitle A, office of the secretary, part 21, nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the department of transportation - effectuation of title VI of the civil rights act of 1964 and any provisions of such regulations as may in the future be amended. C. Nondiscrimination Covenants: The lessee, for himself/herself, and for his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest and assigns, as part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree, as a covenant running with the land: 1. That no person, on the grounds of race, color or national origin, shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of such facilities; 2. That in the construction of any improvements on, over or under such land and the furnishing of services thereof, no person on the grounds of race, color or natural origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subject to discrimination; and 3. That the lessee shall use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed by, or pursuant to title 49, code of federal regulations, department of transportation, subtitle A, office of the secretary, part 21, nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the department of transportation - effectuation of title VI of the civil rights act of 1964 and any provisions of such regulations as may in the future be amended. D. Termination Of Lease: In the event of a breach of any of the nondiscrimination covenants pursuant to part 21 of the regulations of the office of the secretary of transportation, the lessor shall have the right to terminate this lease and to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. E. Servicing Aircraft: It is clearly understood and agreed by the lessee that no right or privilege has been granted which would operate to prevent any person, firm, or corporation operating aircraft on the airport from performing services on its own aircraft with its own regular employees (including, but not limited to, maintenance and repair) that it may choose to perform. F. Exclusive Right: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein contained shall be construed to grant or authorize the granting of an exclusive right. G. Improvement Of Landing Area: Lessor reserves the right to further develop or improve the landing area of the airport as it sees fit, regardless of the desires or views of the lessee and without interference or hindrance from lessee. H. Maintenance And Repair: Lessor reserves the right, but without obligation to lessee, to maintain and keep in repair the landing areas of the airport and all public facilities of the airport, together with the right to direct and control all activities of lessee in this regard. I. National Emergency: During the time of war or national emergency, lessor shall have the right to lease the landing area or any part thereof to the United States government for military or naval use, and if such lease is executed the provisions of this instrument, insofar as they are inconsistent with the provisions of the lease to the government, shall be suspended. J. Protection Against Obstruction: Lessor reserves the right to take any action it considers necessary to protect the aerial approaches of the airport against obstruction, together with the right to prevent lessee from erecting, or permitting to be erected, any building or other structure on or adjacent to the airport which, in the opinion of the lessor, would limit the usefulness of the airport or constitute a hazard to aircraft. K. Federal Agreements: This lease shall be subordinate to the provisions of any existing or future agreement between lessor and the United States, relative to the operation and maintenance of the airport, the execution of which has been or may be required as a condition precedent to the expenditure of federal funds for the development of the airport. L. Right To Close Airport: The lessor reserves the right to temporarily close the airport or any of the facilities thereon for maintenance, improvement, or for the safety of the public. M. Assignment Of Lease: Lessor reserves the right to approve or deny any assignment of this lease or sublease of the premises. N. Indemnification: 1. It is understood and agreed that the lessee is an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the city, and the city is an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the lessee with regard to its acts or omissions hereunder. 2. Lessee agrees to indemnify fully, defend and save and hold harmless the city, its officers, agents and employees from and against all losses, damages, claims, liabilities and causes of action of every kind of character and nature as well as costs and fees, including reasonable attorney fees connected therewith, and expenses of the investigations thereof, based upon or arising out of damages or injuries to third persons or their property caused by the negligence, intentional acts or omissions of lessee, its officers, agents or employees. City shall give to lessee prompt and reasonable written notice of any such claims or action, and lessee shall have the right to investigate, compromise and defend the same to the extent of its own interests. In carrying out any of the provisions herein, or in exercising any power or authority granted to lessee, there shall be no liability upon any official of Salt Lake City Corporation, Salt Lake City airports, their authorized assistants, consultants or employees, either personally or as officials of the city, it being understood that in such matters they act as agents and representatives of Salt Lake City Corporation. 3. It is further understood and agreed that the city assumes no responsibility for any damages or losses that may occur to the lessee's property, except the only obligation that the city assumes is that it will not wilfully, intentionally or negligently damage the property of the lessee. Note: These minimum standards do not abrogate existing leases on the airport, as of the effective date hereof. (Ord. 86-98 § 12, 1998: prior code § 2-19-2) 16.56.030: LEASE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS: The city will not accept an original request to lease land or facilities at the airport unless the proposed lessee submits in writing a proposal which sets forth the scope of operations proposed, which shall include the following: A. The services the applicant will offer; B. The amount of land that the applicant desires to lease; C. The building space the applicant will construct or lease; D. The number of aircraft the applicant will provide; E. The number and qualifications of persons the applicant will employ; F. The proposed hours of operation; G. The amount and types of insurance coverage the applicant will maintain; H. Evidence of the applicant's financial capability to perform and provide the above services and facilities. (Prior code § 2-19-3) 16.56.040: BOND REQUIREMENTS: A. Upon the execution of the lease agreement and prior to entering the premises, the lessee shall provide to the city a performance bond, written with a company or companies acceptable to the city, conditioned upon the faithful and true performance, observation and compliance with all of the terms, conditions and provisions of the lease agreement. Such performance bond shall be in an amount based upon twenty percent (20%) of the minimum guaranteed annual rental and fees, rounded to nearest one hundred dollars ($100.00). In lieu of such performance bond, the city may, upon the approval of the director, accept a cash deposit equivalent to the performance bond, and the city shall not be required to pay any interest on the deposit. B. Airport users each shall provide to the city a performance bond, written with a company or companies acceptable to the city, conditioned upon the faithful performance, observation and compliance with this title. Such performance bond shall be in an amount based upon twenty percent (20%) of the user's projected annual landing and other fees, rounded to the nearest one hundred dollars ($100.00). In lieu of such performance bond, the city may, upon the approval of the director, accept a cash deposit equivalent to the performance bond, and the city shall not be required to pay any interest on such deposit. (Ord. 42-87 § 10, 1987: prior code § 2-19- 4) 16.56.050: MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESSES; ANNUAL FEE: Minimum requirements associated with any business for profit not specifically addressed in this title shall be as provided by the director. In providing the minimum requirements herein, the director shall treat all similar type services equally. Permittee shall pay to the city the annual fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule prior to issuance of the permit agreement. (Ord. 24- 11, 2011) 16.56.060: AERIAL APPLICATION OPERATIONS: Any person desiring to engage in aerial application operations must hold an agricultural aircraft operator certificate issued by the FAA under part 137 of the FAA regulations, comply with requirements of the state and political subdivisions thereof, and as a minimum, do the following: A. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; B. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate square feet of land to provide for buildings, aircraft parking and tiedown, and parking space for loading vehicles and equipment; C. Construct or lease a building providing adequate square footage of properly lighted and heated space for housing office, restrooms and storage. Such building shall contain public telephone facilities; D. Provide at least one person holding a current FAA commercial certificate, properly rated for the aircraft to be used and meeting the requirements of part 137 of the FAA regulations and applicable regulations of the state; E. Provide at least one aircraft, which shall be airworthy, meeting all the requirements of part 137 of the FAA regulations and applicable regulations of the state. Such aircraft shall be owned or leased by agreement in writing and based on the lessee's leasehold; F. Provide storage and containment of noxious chemical materials in a segregated, safe area protected from public access; G. Provide availability of aircraft suitably equipped for agriculture or firefighting operations with adequate safeguards against spillage of noxious chemical materials on the runways or taxiways or dispersal by wind force to other operational areas on the airport; H. The hours of operation shall be as required by each individual lessee; I. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or certificate of insurance, written by an insurance company or companies acceptable to the city, in an amount not less than five million dollars ($5,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The coverages as provided above shall be increased if, in the opinion of the mayor or his/her designee, such is warranted. (Ord. 88-86 § 18, 1986: prior code § 2-19-13) 16.56.070: AIRCRAFT FUEL AND OIL DISPENSING SERVICES: Any person desiring to dispense aviation fuels and oil and provide other related services, such as aircraft parking, shall, as a minimum, do the following: A. Register the business with the director stating the scope of activities to be entered into; B. Obtain appropriate certification to comply with FAA regulations and maintain such certification in a current status; C. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate square feet of land to provide for building or buildings, adequate aircraft parking area and dispensing equipment; D. Construct or lease a building which will provide adequate square footage of properly lighted and heated floor space for office, public lounge and restrooms. Such building shall contain public telephone facilities; E. Provide at least one properly trained person who shall be on duty during all hours of operation; F. Provide emergency starting equipment, adequate fire extinguishers, adequate towing equipment, and wheel chocks; G. Provide as a minimum two (2) dispensers, metered, filter equipped, fixed or mobile, for dispensing aviation fuels in sufficient quantity to supply the demand, adequate stock of appropriate lubricants, and separate dispensing pumps and meters for each grade of fuel to be dispensed; H. Fueling service shall be provided from six o'clock (6:00) A.M. to thirty (30) minutes after sundown, seven (7) days per week. At least one fixed base operator, however, shall be open twenty four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. Such twenty four (24) hour per day requirement shall not be applicable at Airport II unless there exists two (2) or more fixed base operators at the airport; I. Provide insurance coverage, written with an insurance company or companies acceptable to the city, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The above coverages shall be increased when, in the opinion of the city, such is warranted. (Prior code § 2-19-9) 16.56.080: AIRCRAFT PARTS HOUSE: Any person desiring to provide an aircraft parts house must, as a minimum, do the following: A. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; B. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate square feet of land for required building; C. Construct or lease a building providing adequate square footage of properly lighted and heated space to house office, restroom facilities, and minimum shop and hangar space as required for FAA repair shop certification. Such building shall contain public telephone facilities; D. Provide knowledgeable personnel in sufficient number to meet the requirements of operation; E. The normal operating hours will be at the operator's discretion. The services, however, shall be reasonably available to the public; F. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or a certificate of insurance with a company or companies acceptable to the city, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The coverages as provided above shall be increased if, in the opinion of the mayor or his/her designee, such is warranted. (Ord. 88-86 § 14, 1986: prior code § 2-19-11) 16.56.090: AIRCRAFT RENTAL: A. Minimum Requirements: Any person desiring to engage in the rental of aircraft to the public must, as a minimum, do the following: 1. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be performed; 2. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate square footage of land to provide space for aircraft parking and building or buildings; 3. Lease or construct a building which will provide adequate square footage of properly heated and lighted space for housing of offices, restrooms and public space. Such building shall contain a telephone for public use; 4. Provide at least one person having a current pilot certificate with appropriate ratings. The office shall be attended during all hours of operations; 5. Provide at least one airworthy aircraft owned or leased in writing to the lessee; 6. Accomplish all work and maintain all aircraft in accordance with FAA regulations, and have all work inspected according to state and federal regulations; 7. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or a certificate of insurance, with a company or companies acceptable to the city, for all aircraft owned, in amounts not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability and not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per seat passenger liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The amounts under the basic coverage, as provided above, may be increased if, in the opinion of the city, it is warranted. B. Operating Hours: The normal operating hours of an aircraft rental business will be at the operator's discretion. The services, however, shall be reasonably available to the public. C. Fees: If the right to perform aircraft rental on the airport is granted to any person by permit agreement as stated in subsection 16.56.010E of this chapter, or its successor, such person shall pay the fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per year for each aircraft such person owns which will be used in the performance of aircraft rental. Ownership as used herein shall be as the term "owner" is defined in section 16.04.320 of this title, or its successor. The permittee will supply the director a list of all aircraft with the corresponding FAA "N-number" for all aircraft to be used in the performance of aircraft rental. Such fees will be paid prior to the issuance of the permit agreement. The payment of annual fees above will be increased or decreased by aircraft the permittee adds or may delete in the performance of aircraft rental during the time said permit agreement is in place. Permittee shall be subject to all conditions of this section except space requirements as stated in subsections A2 and A3 of this section. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.56.100: AIRCRAFT SALES: A. Any person desiring to engage in business of commercial sale of new and/or used aircraft must, as a minimum, do the following: 1. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; 2. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate space for operation of the business to be conducted; 3. Provide proof of insurance coverage, in the form of a policy or certificate of insurance written by an insurance company or companies acceptable to the city, in amounts not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability and not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per seat passenger liability. Said policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The above coverage shall include aircraft held for sale and/or demonstration by the lessee but owned by others; 4. Provide the buyer proof that the aircraft to be sold is certificated under FAA regulations as airworthy, or provide the buyer with a statement of the work required to meet all regulations in order to obtain certification; 5. Provide or contract for all necessary service to fulfill implied and expressed warranties on aircraft within the terms of the contract. B. If the right to perform aircraft sales on the airport is granted to any person by permit agreement as stated in subsection 16.56.010E of this chapter, or its successor, such person shall pay a fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) prior to issuance of the permit agreement. Permittees shall be subject to all the requirements of this section except space requirements as stated in subsection A2 of this section. C. Transacted sales by persons normally not in the business of aircraft sales on a commercial basis are exempt from this section. (Prior code § 2-19-5) 16.56.110: AIRFRAME AND/OR POWER PLANT REPAIR: Any person desiring to engage in airframe and/or power plant repair service must, as a minimum, do the following: A. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; B. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate space for operation of the business to be conducted, or if no space is required, otherwise comply with sections 16.12.070 and 16.12.090 of this title; C. Provide the appropriate certification to comply with FAA regulations, and maintain such certificate in a current status; D. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or a certificate of insurance with a company or companies acceptable to the city, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' written notice to the city. The above coverages shall be increased when, in the opinion of the city, the number and type of aircraft serviced warrants same; E. Accomplish all work in accordance with FAA regulations and have all work inspected according to state and federal regulations. (Ord. 77-04 § 46, 2004: prior code § 2-19-6) 16.56.120: AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICE: The following shall apply to any person desiring to engage in scheduled air transportation service: A. Such person must hold a current FAA certificate with ratings appropriate for the functions to be accomplished. B. Prior to entering into an agreement for any space to be leased from the city, and prior to commencing any operations at the airport for conduct of the business of air transportation, the prospective lessee must present to the director information satisfactory to the director that the lessee meets the minimum standards established by the city for engaging in the business of air transportation. C. Each prospective lessee shall submit to the director a verified statement, including a complete summary of the general nature of its air transportation business and if an individual, such person's name and address, or if a partnership, the names and addresses of all the partners, or if a corporation, association or other organization, the names and addresses of the president, vice president, secretary, and full time managing officer or station manager. D. The lessee may be required to submit a financial statement and credit ratings acceptable to the city. E. The lessee must be a certified air carrier who holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued under section 401 of the federal aviation act of 1958, as amended, or its successor, other than an air carrier which holds a certificate of public convenience and necessity for supplemental air service; or a supplemental air carrier as defined in title 1, general provisions definitions, section 101(32) of the federal aviation act of 1958, as amended, or its successor; or an air taxi operator subject to part 298 of the economic regulations of the civil aeronautics board and engaged directly in air transportation of passengers and/or property, and who does not hold a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the civil aeronautics board pursuant to section 401 of the federal aviation act of 1958, as amended, or other economic authority issued by the civil aeronautics board. F. All airlines and air transportation companies must meet the following minimum standards for the conduct of business at the airport: 1. The lessee shall lease space in the terminals on the west side of Salt Lake City International Airport providing adequate square footage of space for passengers and crew members of itinerant aircraft, office, passenger gatehold, and satisfactory arrangements for checking of passengers, handling of luggage and ticketing. 2. The lessee shall provide at least one FAA certificated commercial pilot who is appropriately rated to conduct air taxi service as offered. At its option, the city may require the lessee to provide assurance satisfactory to the city of its continued availability of suitable aircraft with qualified operating crews. 3. The lessee shall provide at least one 4-place aircraft which shall meet all the requirements of the commercial operator's certificate held. 4. The normal operating hours will be at the operator's discretion. The services, however, shall be reasonably available to the public eight (8) hours per day, five (5) days per week. Scheduled lessees must supply to the city a schedule of their flights, shall operate at all times on a scheduled basis, and shall comply with all city, county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and ordinances. 5. Each airline and air transportation company shall provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or certificate of insurance, written with a company or companies acceptable to the city, in an amount not less than twenty five million dollars ($25,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The city, at its option, may require insurance coverage in excess of the coverage provided for above if in the opinion of the city it is warranted. (Prior code § 2-19-12) 16.56.130: COMMERCIAL FLIGHT SERVICE: A. Any person desiring to engage in the commercial flight services shall, as a minimum, do the following: 1. Provide at least one person having a current pilot certificate with appropriate ratings for the aircraft to be flown; 2. Provide at least one properly certificated aircraft owned or leased in writing to the lessee which is maintained according to the standards of a commercial operation under the appropriate FAR; 3. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or a certificate of insurance, written by a company or companies acceptable to the city, for all aircraft owned or leased by lessee in amounts not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability and not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per seat passenger liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The coverages as provided above shall be increased if, in the opinion of the mayor or his/her designee, such is warranted. B. If the right to perform commercial flight service on the airport is granted to any person by permit agreement, as stated in subsection 16.56.010E of this chapter, or its successor, such person shall pay the fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per year. If the person performing a commercial flight service is the owner (as the term "owner" is defined in section 16.04.320 of this title, or its successor), of the aircraft used in the performance of a commercial flight service, the person performing a commercial flight service shall pay an additional fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule per aircraft per year for each aircraft used in the performance of a commercial flight service. The permittee will supply the director a list of all aircraft with the corresponding FAA "N-number" for all owned aircraft to be used in the performance of commercial flight service. Such fees will be paid prior to the issuance of the permit agreement. The payment of annual fees above will be increased or decreased by owned aircraft the permittee adds or may delete in the performance of commercial flight service during the time the permit agreement is in place. The permittee shall be subject to all conditions of this section except space requirements as stated in subsection A2 of this section. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.56.140: COMPLETE FIXED BASE OPERATION: Any person desiring to engage in a complete fixed base operation must, as a minimum, do the following: A. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; B. Provide sales, servicing, rental and display of franchised aircraft, aircraft engine overhaul, repair and maintenance (at least demonstrated capability to perform minor repairs coupled with possession of the necessary tools, jacks, towing equipment, tire repair equipment, etc.), and airframe repair and maintenance service for business and/or personal aircraft by FAA certificated mechanics with appropriate airframe and/or power plant ratings; C. In providing aircraft rental and sales, provide for the following: 1. Availability, during specified hours, of aircraft commensurate with the scope of planned activity as specified in this chapter, 2. Sales or distributorship franchise for an aircraft manufacturer for new aircraft, or adequate sources of used aircraft, 3. Suitable sales and office facilities, which may be leased, rented or constructed on the airport property, 4. Satisfactory arrangements at the airport for repairing and servicing of sold aircraft during the sale guarantee period, as specified in sections 16.56.080, 16.56.100, 16.56.110 and 16.56.170 of this chapter, or their successors, 5. Minimum stocks of spare parts peculiar to the aircraft types for which sales privileges are granted; D. Provide, at lessee's option, radio repair and overhaul services, sale at wholesale or retail of any aircraft parts and accessories, and/or propeller repair or overhaul services as licensed by the FAA and as prescribed in this chapter; E. Any person who desires to operate as a fixed base operator shall meet the following minimum standards: 1. Lease existing facilities or construct a building to provide adequate square footage of shop space meeting local and state industrial code requirements, plus adequate office space. Such facility shall contain a public telephone, 2. Provide full time FAA certificated mechanics in such fields as airframe and engine maintenance, electronic instrument maintenance, and others as required, 3. Provide minimum equipment, such as, but not limited to, machine tools, jacks, lifts and test centers, as required for its operation, 4. Make arrangements for access to, or for the provision of, such minimum capacity for the storage of aircraft as the director shall specify, and shall be required to remove any nonairworthy aircraft from the airport premises within a reasonable time, 5. Promptly remove from the public landing area, as soon as permitted by cognizant FAA and CAB authorities, any disabled aircraft owned or controlled by the lessee, coupled with the availability of or arrangements made for suitable tractors, towbars, jacks, dollies, and other equipment as might be needed to remove the largest aircraft that normally could be expected to be operated from the lessee's facility, 6. Meet all applicable safety requirements, if painting of aircraft is anticipated; F. Furnish, as may be required by the city, such primary line service to the public on a nondiscriminatory basis as the sale of aviation petroleum fuel and aircraft propellant products, the rental of aircraft parking areas, storage and/or hangar space (including demonstrated capability to efficiently and safely move aircraft to such areas and store them in compliance with local regulations), pilot training with FAA certified instructors, aircraft rental facilities, aircraft charter, and flight maintenance facilities; G. Provide, as may be required by the city, the following: 1. At all fueling locations, suitable space in a convenient location to service the type of aircraft using the airport, 2. Tank storage capacity, either above or below ground as mutually agreed upon, for aviation fuels, 3. Adequate grounding rods at all fueling locations to eliminate hazards of static electricity, together with mobile and/or fixed pumping equipment which meets all applicable safety requirements, with reliable metering devices subject to independent inspection, and with a pumping efficiency capable of filling jet aircraft including the "jumbo" or" bus" series within a reasonable time, 4. Uniformed personnel on full time duty during all hours of operation; H. Maintain an adequate staff of employees with skills, licenses and certificates appropriate to the activity provided as specified in these minimum standards; I. Conform to all safety, health and sanitary codes; J. Provide energizers, starters, passenger loading steps, oxygen and compressed air, together with such other equipment and supplies as may be required to serve the types of aircraft using its facility; K. Remove snow and otherwise clean up lessee's fueling and aircraft parking areas and possess the equipment necessary for this purpose; L. Furnish, as may be required by the city, a financial statement and credit rating acceptable to the city; M. Provide insurance coverage written with an insurance company or companies acceptable to the city in amounts not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) hangar keeper's liability insurance. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy, the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The above levels of coverage shall be increased if, in the opinion of the mayor or his/her designee, such is warranted; N. Be available, either individually or in connection with the other fixed base operators situated at the airport, for repair service and emergency service during the night hours, weekends and holidays, to ensure that aircraft repair service is available for general aviation users at all times. This service shall be provided for the public and/or general aviation users. In any event, each fixed base operator shall remain open for business at least eight (8) hours daily, five (5) days each week. The lessee may be required by the city to supply, on a twenty four (24) hour basis, seven (7) days per week, facilities for the sale of aviation petroleum, fuel and aircraft propellant products. Likewise, lessee may be required to provide basic facilities and employees to handle the tiedown and/or hangar space for aircraft on a seven (7) day, twenty four (24) hour basis. (Ord. 88-86 § 17, 1986: prior code § 2-19-16) 16.56.150: FLIGHT TRAINING: A. Any person desiring to engage in pilot flight instruction shall provide, as a minimum, the following: 1. Registration: Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; 2. Lease: Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain reasonable space which is adequate for operation of the business to be conducted; 3. Certification: Obtain appropriate certification to comply with FAA regulations and accomplish all flight checks and other requirements to maintain such certification in a current status; 4. Insurance: a. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or a certificate of insurance, with a company or companies acceptable to the city, in the minimum amounts established by section 63-30-34, Utah Code Annotated, or its successor, as maximum amounts for which a governmental entity may be held liable, b. A flight instructor using an aircraft which it does not own shall be in compliance with this section if the aircraft owner carries insurance in type and amounts equal to or greater in coverage than the above, and the aircraft owner's insurer names the flight instructor as a named insured on the aircraft owner's insurance policy, c. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. The above coverage shall be increased when, in the opinion of the mayor or his/her designee, such is warranted. B. If the right to perform flight training on the airport is granted to any person by permit agreement as stated in subsection 16.56.010E of this chapter, or its successor, such person shall pay the fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per year. If the person performing flight training is the owner (as the term "owner" is defined in section 16.04.320 of this title, or its successor), of the aircraft used in the performance of flight training, the person performing flight training shall pay an additional fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule per aircraft per year for each aircraft used in the performance of flight training. The permittee will supply the director a list of all aircraft with the corresponding FAA "N-number" for all owned aircraft to be used in the performance of flight training. Such fees will be paid prior to the issuance of the permit agreement. The payment of annual fees above will be increased or decreased by owned aircraft the permittee adds or may delete in the performance of flight training during the time the permit agreement is in place. The permittee shall be subject to all conditions of this section except space requirements as stated in subsection A2 of this section. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.56.160: FLYING CLUB REGULATIONS: A. Approval Required: Flying clubs shall be permitted at the airport only upon prior written approval of the director. B. Definition Of Flying Club: "Flying club" means an association or group of more than three (3) individuals jointly owning or leasing an aircraft where payment is made to the club for the operating time of such aircraft. The registration certificate issued by the FAA must show the names of all owners if the club is not incorporated, and the aircraft must be registered in the name of any incorporated flying club. C. Organization: Flying clubs must be organized as nonprofit corporations under the laws of the state, or as duly organized nonprofit, functioning unincorporated associations for the purpose of: 1. Fostering flying for pleasure; 2. Development of skills in aeronautics, including pilotage or navigation; and 3. The development of an awareness and appreciation of aviation requirements and techniques by the general public in the field of aviation and aeronautics. D. Documents Required: Flying clubs shall furnish the director with copies of their bylaws, articles of incorporation, operating rules, membership agreements, and the location and address of the club's registered office. The director shall also be furnished with a current roster of all officers and directors, including places of residence, business addresses and telephone numbers, who shall be responsible for compliance by the club members with all aviation laws and airport rules and regulations. E. Commercial Operation Prohibited: Neither flying clubs nor any individual member thereof shall provide instruction to other than its members or engage in charter service or in any commercial operation at the airport. F. Membership Records: Flying clubs shall keep a membership record of all members, containing full names and addresses, past and present members included, together with the date their membership commenced and terminated, and the investment share held by each member. Such records shall be available for review at any reasonable time by the director. G. Operation Of Aircraft: 1. All aircraft owned, leased or used by flying clubs shall be registered with the director, and may not be leased or loaned to others for any commercial use, purpose or venture. The club's aircraft shall not be used by other than bona fide members for rental or by anyone for charter or taxi lease. 2. An aircraft operated, owned or leased by a flying club shall meet all airworthiness requirements of the appropriate federal agency. 3. The flying club shall not derive greater revenue from the use of its aircraft than the amount necessary for its actual operation, maintenance and replacement. H. Rule And Regulation Compliance: All flying club members must comply with all FAA, state and airport rules and regulations. I. Insurance Required: Each aircraft owned by the flying club must have liability insurance coverage in amounts not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability, and not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per seat passenger liability. Certificates of such insurance coverage shall be filed with the director and the policy shall contain a provision whereby such insurance may be canceled only after giving thirty (30) days' written notice to the director. The above levels of coverage shall be increased if, in the opinion of the mayor or his/her designee, such is warranted. J. Holding Harmless: The flying club shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the city from any and all claims of liability for personal injury, death or property damage, or any and all other damages whatsoever resulting from its operation at the airport. (Amended during 1/88 supplement: Ord. 88-86 § 18, 1986: prior code § 2-19-17) 16.56.170: RADIO, INSTRUMENT OR PROPELLER REPAIR SERVICE: A. Any person desiring to provide a radio, instrument or propeller repair service must, at a minimum, do the following: 1. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; 2. Obtain appropriate certification to comply with FAA regulations and maintain such certification in a current status; 3. Enter into a lease in which the leasehold shall contain adequate square feet of land for required building; 4. Construct or lease a building providing adequate square footage of properly lighted and heated space for housing office, restroom facilities and minimum shop and hangar space as required for FAA repair shop certifications. Such building shall contain public telephone facilities; 5. Provide at least one FAA certified repairman qualified in accordance with the terms of the repair station certificate; 6. The normal operating hours of such service will be at the operator's discretion. The services, however, shall be reasonably available to the public; 7. Provide proof of insurance coverage in the form of a policy or certificate of insurance, written by an insurance company or companies acceptable to the city, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. Such policy or certificate of insurance shall be filed with the city, shall name Salt Lake City Corporation as an additional insured, and shall contain a statement that in the event of cancellation or material change in the policy the insurer will give thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the city. Insurance coverage limits may be required to be increased when it is deemed by the city that the risk exposure is greater than the minimum requirements herein. B. If the right to perform radio instrument or propeller repair on the airport is granted to any person by permit agreement as stated in subsection 16.56.010E of this chapter, or its successor, such person shall pay the fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule prior to issuance of the permit agreement. The permittee shall be subject to all conditions of this section except space requirements, as stated in subsections A3 and A4 of this section. (Ord. 24-11, 2011) 16.56.180: MULTIPLE SERVICES: A. Any person desiring to engage in two (2) or more commercial aeronautical activities must, as a minimum, do the following: 1. Register the business with the director, stating the scope of activities to be entered into; 2. Obtain appropriate certification to comply with FAA regulations, and maintain such certification in a current status; 3. Enter into a lease for multiple services in which the leasehold shall contain adequate square feet of land to provide space for specific use area requirements established for services to be offered. Specific use space need not be cumulative where a combination use can be reasonably and feasibly established, the determination of which is to be made by the city; 4. Construct or lease a building containing adequate square footage to provide properly lighted and heated space for office, public lounge, pilot briefing, and restrooms. Such building shall contain public telephone facilities. Repair stations must provide minimum shop and hangar space as required for FAA repair shop certification; 5. Assign multiple responsibilities, as needed, to personnel in order to meet personnel requirements for all activities, provided such personnel meet requirements for all activities engaged in; 6. Meet all requirements for aircraft for the specific activities to be engaged in; however, multiple uses can be made of all aircraft, except aerial applicator aircraft, to meet these requirements. In order to meet these requirements, however, a minimum of two (2) aircraft must be owned or leased, under the direct control of the lessee, and based on the lessee's leasehold; 7. Provide all equipment specifically required for each activity; 8. Provide all services specifically required for each activity during the hours of operation as required for that activity under these minimum standards; 9. Adhere to the operating schedule as required for each activity; 10. Obtain the highest single coverage in the amounts and types of insurance established for each specific activity. B. If the right to perform multiple services at the airport is granted to any person by permit agreement as stated in subsection 16.56.010E of this chapter, or its successor, such person shall be responsible for payment of all fees as established for each aeronautical activity engaged in, as specified in this chapter; provided, however, fees for owned aircraft (as the term "owner" is defined in section 16.04.320 of this title, or its successor) will be assessed for one aeronautical activity only. The permittee shall be subject to all conditions of this section except space requirements as stated in subsections A3 and A4 of this section. (Prior code § 2- 19-15) CHAPTER 16.60 MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION SECTION: Article I. General Regulations 16.60.001: Authority To Establish Rules And Regulations 16.60.005: Exemptions From Requirements Of This Chapter 16.60.010: Compliance With State And Other Regulations 16.60.020: Driving On Loading Areas; Restrictions 16.60.030: Vehicle Ramp Operations 16.60.040: Common Carriers 16.60.050: Accidents To Be Reported 16.60.060: Prohibited Vehicles And Animals 16.60.065: Parking Areas 16.60.067: Parking Vehicles 16.60.070: Impoundment Authorized When 16.60.075: Passenger Courtesy Carts Article II. Ground Transportation Businesses 16.60.080: Purpose Of Article II Provisions 16.60.090: Definitions 16.60.095: Businesses Authorized To Provide Ground Transportation 16.60.097: Ground Transportation Service At The Airport 16.60.100: Passenger Pick Up Zones 16.60.110: Commercial Charges 16.60.120: Ground Transportation Fees Required 16.60.130: Payment Of Fees 16.60.140: City Ordinances Applicable To Airport 16.60.180: Ground Transportation Booths 16.60.190: Staging And Parking Of Ground Transportation Vehicles 16.60.200: Signs ARTICLE I. GENERAL REGULATIONS 16.60.001: AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH RULES AND REGULATIONS: To the extent authorized by the provisions of this chapter and consistent with other applicable provisions of this code, the department director, under guidance and direction from the mayor, may enter into contracts deemed necessary or desirable and may establish rules and regulations necessary to administer the provisions of this chapter and any security or operating requirements applicable to the Salt Lake City International Airport. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.005: EXEMPTIONS FROM REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CHAPTER: Vehicles licensed and operated by a government agency, a university or school district, the Utah transit authority, an ambulance service, and others, as may be designated in department rules and regulations, and others, as may be designated by the director, are exempt from the requirements of this chapter. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.010: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND OTHER REGULATIONS: A. No person shall operate a motor vehicle on the airport except in strict compliance with applicable laws of the state, city ordinances, and department rules and regulations. B. No person or owner shall drive, or permit to be driven, stopped or parked on any street, parking lot, alleyway or driveway within the airport, any vehicle which is required under the laws of the state to be inspected and registered unless such vehicle has been inspected and registered, and has attached thereto in proper position a valid and unexpired certificate of inspection as required by the laws of the state. C. All vehicles operated on airport property, including ramp areas, shall be maintained in a safe operating condition. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.020: DRIVING ON LOADING AREAS; RESTRICTIONS: A. Any motorized vehicle being used on the ramp as a service vehicle shall display the department issued identification sticker. Each such vehicle shall also bear company identification visible from fifty feet (50') on both sides of the vehicle. B. No person or vehicle is permitted in, on, or around any secured area, such as, but not limited to, any hangar, landing field, runway, apron or taxi strip, without prior permission from the department director. C. Automobiles, trucks and other equipment (including airport maintenance and emergency vehicles) being driven on any landing area, runway, taxi strip, or apron shall display a standard checkered flag or flashing amber or red light, as appropriate, if operated during the nighttime, or, when applicable, be marked in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations or as directed by the Department Director, and shall not be operated without prior permission of the control tower. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.030: VEHICLE RAMP OPERATIONS: A. Speed Limits: Motor vehicles shall be operated on established streets and roadways within the airport in strict compliance with speed limits posted on traffic signs. They shall also be maintained and operated in conformity with all motor vehicle regulations and laws of the State and City. Motor vehicles being operated on any passenger loading ramp, aircraft parking ramp, or in any area immediately adjacent to the terminals or hangars, shall be driven cautiously and at a safe and reasonable speed, but not to exceed twenty (20) miles per hour. B. Use Of Ramp Roadways: Vehicles shall only be operated within the limits of the designated painted roadways on the air operations areas, except as required to perform aircraft servicing and airfield inspections. C. Traffic Markings On Paved Surfaces: Vehicle operators shall observe all traffic markings painted on pavement surfaces of the aircraft operations area. D. Yield Right-Of-Way To Aircraft: All vehicles shall yield right-of-way to any aircraft when the aircraft is under tow or has its engines operating. No vehicle shall proceed past such aircraft until the vehicle's progress will not impede the aircraft's movement. This section does not preclude the establishment of agreements to the contrary between the City and the Federal Aviation Administration. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.040: COMMON CARRIERS: No common carrier, vehicle for hire, or ground transportation vehicle shall load or unload passengers at the airport at any place or in any manner other than that designated by the Department Director. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.050: ACCIDENTS TO BE REPORTED: Any person involved in an accident resulting in personal injury or damage to property on the airport shall report such accident promptly to the Office of the Department Director. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.060: PROHIBITED VEHICLES AND ANIMALS: No go-cart, motorbike, bicycle, house trailer, or similar vehicle, or horse, shall be permitted on any landing area, ramp, taxiway, or hangar area without approval of the Department Director, except for bicycles that are secured and delivered to an aircraft for transport, or motorcycles used for surface transportation in a hangar area. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.065: PARKING AREAS: A. Parking areas for motor vehicles shall be set aside for airport employee parking and general public parking. No person shall park a motor vehicle or a trailer in any place on the airport other than those areas designated by the Department Director or as expressly set forth in this title. No person shall park a vehicle in or use an area designated as an employee parking lot unless such person has complied with all rules and regulations, and other requirements for employee parking as established by the department. B. Tenants of T-hangars and shade hangars may park their motor vehicles in their own hangars when the aircraft is being flown, or in front of their hangar if they are present. Service or delivery vehicles may park next to a tenant's hangar long enough for delivery. All others shall park in public lots. C. No person shall park a motor vehicle on the airport in excess of seventy two (72) consecutive hours unless it is parked in the public parking area or with the authorization of the airport. D. No person shall park a motor vehicle in an area designated as a public parking lot unless such person pays the authorized rate for such parking lots. A schedule of parking rates shall be available in the Airport Office of Finance and Administration. No person shall use an area designated as a public parking lot for any primary or ancillary commercial or revenue producing purpose without written permission from the department. Each hour of use in violation of this section shall be a separate offense. (Ord. 10-19, 2019) 16.60.067: PARKING VEHICLES: No person shall park a vehicle on the airport other than in the manner and at locations indicated by posted traffic signs and markings. Each hour a vehicle remains parked in violation of this section shall be a separate offense. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.070: IMPOUNDMENT AUTHORIZED WHEN: Any vehicle parked in violation of department rules and regulations may be impounded or relocated by a certified peace officer. The owner thereof shall pay for the tow charge, regular parking fees, and other penalties and related charges. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.075: PASSENGER COURTESY CARTS: A. No person may operate any vehicle inside a city owned building at the airport without proper authority. The owner of any such authorized vehicle shall install and maintain a speed governor on each such vehicle which will prevent the vehicle from exceeding five (5) miles per hour. Vehicles at all times shall be maintained in a safe operating condition. Any person operating such vehicle shall yield to pedestrians, not pass pedestrians unless there is enough space to leave an eighteen inch (18") clearance between vehicle and pedestrian, and otherwise operate the vehicle in a safe manner. B. The department director may prohibit the operation of such vehicles at the airport or limit their use at any time. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) ARTICLE II. GROUND TRANSPORTATION BUSINESSES 16.60.080: PURPOSE OF ARTICLE II PROVISIONS: The provisions set out in this article are enacted for the purpose of: A. Requiring persons who conduct business at the airport by providing ground transportation service to assist the city in defraying the expense of providing certain facilities and services provided for ground transportation vehicles and services using the airport, and to create an equitable assessment of fees for its use; and B. Requiring such persons to adhere to department rules and regulations regarding the operation of ground transportation vehicles to ensure that such are conducted in a safe, efficient, and cost effective manner for the public benefit. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.090: DEFINITIONS: The following words and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings defined and set forth in this section: AIRPORT SHARED RIDE SERVICE: Ground transportation provided by an authorized ground transportation business contracted through the department of airports to provide on demand shared ride service to and from the Salt Lake City International Airport. AIRPORT SHARED RIDE VEHICLE: Any authorized ground transportation vehicle operating under contract with the department of airports to provide airport shared ride service. AUTHORIZED GROUND TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS: Any business operating any ground transportation vehicle, which has a current, valid business license as required by the city and which: A. Registers the business in accordance with the requirements established by the department, and B. Is current with all fees or charges imposed by the department or city. AUTOMOBILE: Any motor vehicle with passenger seating for five (5) persons or less not including the driver. BUS: Any motor vehicle with a seating capacity of twenty five (25) passengers or more, not including the driver. BUSINESS: A voluntary association legally formed and organized to carry on a business in Utah in the legal name of the association, including, without limitation, a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or sole proprietorship. CIVIL NOTICE: The written notice of a ground transportation violation. COURTESY VEHICLE: Any motor vehicle regularly operated on Salt Lake City streets for transportation of customers and/or baggage without making a specific separate charge to the passenger for such transportation. DEPARTMENT: The Salt Lake City department of airports. DEPARTMENT AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION (AVI) TAG: An electronic transponder used to identify vehicles and provide the department with vehicle data and billing information. DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: The director of the Salt Lake City department of airports. DEPARTMENT INSPECTION SEAL: A sticker or seal issued by the department to signify that a ground transportation vehicle has passed the required department inspection. These department inspection seals are nontransferable and no ground transportation vehicle may be operated without such seal. DEPARTMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS: Rules and regulations developed and adopted by the department director to govern ground transportation service and businesses at the airport. FIXED SCHEDULE: Ground transportation service operating on a regular time schedule previously announced as to time of departure and arrival between the airport and definitely established and previously announced points along definitely established and previously announced routes regardless of whether there are passengers or freight to be carried. GROUND TRANSPORTATION APPEAL COMMITTEE: A committee established by the department director to hear and rule on appeals, suspensions, and other matters related to ground transportation in and connected with the city. GROUND TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS: Any business operating any ground transportation vehicle. GROUND TRANSPORTATION SERVICE: The transportation of passengers by a ground transportation business. GROUND TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE: Any motor vehicle used for the transportation of persons using Salt Lake City streets for commercial purposes regardless of whether a fee or fare is collected. HOTEL VEHICLE: Any motor vehicle regularly operated by a ground transportation business under contract to or directly by a motel, hotel, or other lodging business to provide transportation of customers and/or baggage for the contracted establishment, for which transportation the customer is charged a separate fee or fare, and which is subject to a contract filed with the department providing for operating the vehicle. LIMOUSINE: Any vehicle described by its manufacturer or aftermarket manufacturer as a limousine or a luxury vehicle, with a driver furnished, who is dressed in professional business attire or a chauffeur's uniform. MINIBUS: Any motor vehicle with a seating capacity of sixteen (16) to twenty four (24) passengers, not including the driver. ON DEMAND AIRPORT SERVICE OR ON DEMAND SERVICE: Transportation provided by an authorized ground transportation business which is not "scheduled service" or "prearranged service from the airport" as defined in this section. PREARRANGED SERVICE FROM THE AIRPORT: Transportation from the airport to points within the corporate limits of Salt Lake City provided by an authorized ground transportation business which is contracted for between such business and the person to be transported, or by an agent of the person, prior to the arrival of the person at the Salt Lake City International Airport. Prearranged service from the airport shall include airport ground transportation contracted for by an airline company on behalf of its own passengers whose regular air travel may have been disrupted in some manner. An agent may include a travel agent, family member, employee, business or meeting planner, but excludes an authorized ground transportation business. SCHEDULED SERVICE: Transportation provided by an authorized ground transportation business on a fixed schedule posted with the department in advance of such transportation. TAXI STAND: A public place alongside the curb of a street, or elsewhere in the city, which has been designated by the mayor or the mayor's designee as reserved for the use of taxicabs available for hire by passengers, including places otherwise marked as freight zones or other parking restricted zones if designated for use of taxicabs during specified times. TAXICAB: A motor vehicle used in the on demand for hire transportation of passengers or baggage over the public streets and not operated over a fixed route or upon a fixed schedule, but which is subject for contract hire by persons desiring special trips from one point to another, as provided under title 5, chapter 5.72 of this code, or its successor chapter, and authorized to operate in Salt Lake City by contract with the department. VAN: Any licensed motor vehicle other than those designated as a limousine with a passenger seating capacity of six (6) to twelve (12), not including the driver. VEHICLE OPERATOR'S BADGE OR OPERATOR'S BADGE: An identification badge issued by the department to an individual to signify that the individual has met the requirements to operate a ground transportation vehicle. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.095: BUSINESSES AUTHORIZED TO PROVIDE GROUND TRANSPORTATION: It shall be a violation to operate a ground transportation vehicle at the airport, unless such vehicle is part of an authorized ground transportation business. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.097: GROUND TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AT THE AIRPORT: All authorized ground transportation businesses may provide on demand service, scheduled service, or prearranged service at the airport. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.100: PASSENGER PICK UP ZONES: All persons operating a ground transportation vehicle on the premises of the airport shall pick up passengers only in areas as designated by the department director. Ground transportation vehicles may occupy such area only for the period of time established by the department director. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.110: COMMERCIAL CHARGES: Commercial charges may be imposed by the city for the use of airport facilities and services. Any business located at, or doing business on, the airport shall pay all established fees applicable to such business. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.120: GROUND TRANSPORTATION FEES REQUIRED: No ground transportation vehicle or business shall use the airport's roadways or facilities without paying required fees established under section 16.60.110 of this chapter. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.130: PAYMENT OF FEES: Payment of required fees shall be made in the manner prescribed by the department director consistent with department rules and regulations and applicable provisions of this code. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.140: CITY ORDINANCES APPLICABLE TO AIRPORT: All applicable ordinances set forth in this code, including, without limitation, title 5, chapters 5.71 and 5.72 of this code or their successors, shall apply to the airport. Pursuant to applicable provisions of this code, the department director may enter into contracts and establish rules and regulations for taxicab operations specific to the airport. With the approval of the mayor and upon notice to the city council the department director may waive or temporarily impose restrictions not addressed in this chapter or department rules and regulations if it is determined that circumstances in the city exist that create congestion, security concerns, emergency conditions, or other operational problems, and that a temporary suspension or modification of ordinances is in the best interests of the city to address such circumstances. If the city council does not act within sixty (60) days to approve or disapprove the action, then the action is deemed approved. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.180: GROUND TRANSPORTATION BOOTHS: There may be established within the terminal buildings at the airport one or more ground transportation booths for the exclusive use of authorized ground transportation businesses to assist the public to arrange for transportation, including travel reservations and ticket sales. These booths may be made available to businesses in accordance with applicable contracts and/or department rules and regulations. A. No authorized ground transportation business may solicit passengers at the airport except at a bona fide ground transportation booth established by the department director and operated by the authorized ground transportation business. B. No person or business including any ground transportation business may contract for passenger meet and greet services on behalf of any ground transportation business without written permission of the department director. C. In addition to civil penalties, any violation of these solicitation restrictions by any driver or representative of any authorized ground transportation business may result in such driver or business being barred from any further entry to an airport terminal as a driver or authorized ground transportation business employee. D. No representative of any authorized ground transportation business shall transport baggage or cargo in behalf of a customer to or from the airport without documentation such as baggage claim tickets or transfer documents clearly indicating the authority of such representative to transport such baggage. Said representative shall produce such documentation for inspection upon request by an authorized official of the department. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.190: STAGING AND PARKING OF GROUND TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES: Any use of a staging area, parking facilities, taxi stands, parking areas, traffic lanes or other areas and facilities used by authorized ground transportation vehicles are subject to department rules and regulations. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.60.200: SIGNS: Signs may be posted at the airport by authorized ground transportation businesses if such signs are in accordance with applicable city ordinances, department contracts, department rules and regulations, and have been approved by the department director. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) CHAPTER 16.64 VIOLATION, PENALTY AND ENFORCEMENT SECTION: 16.64.010: Prohibitive Nature Of Regulations 16.64.020: Removal Authorized When 16.64.025: Violation; Penalty 16.64.027: Issuance Of A Civil Notice Of Violation 16.64.030: Civil Penalties And Enforcement 16.64.050: Enforcement Procedures; Civil Notice Of Ground Transportation Violation 16.64.060: Expedited Appeal Of Exclusion 16.64.010: PROHIBITIVE NATURE OF REGULATIONS: It is a violation for any person to do any act prohibited by law, to fail or refuse to do any act required by law, to operate any vehicle or aircraft in violation of any provisions of this title or department rules and regulations, or to operate any vehicle or aircraft unless such vehicle or aircraft is equipped and maintained as provided in this title or other applicable law. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.64.020: REMOVAL AUTHORIZED WHEN: Any person using airport property, operating any vehicle or handling any aircraft in violation of this title or other applicable law, or by refusing to comply therewith, may be removed or ejected from the airport, and may be deprived of the further use of the airport and its facilities for such length of time as may be deemed necessary by the Department Director to ensure the safeguarding of the same and the public and its interest therein. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.64.025: VIOLATION; PENALTY: Any person guilty of violating any provision of this title shall be deemed guilty of a Class B misdemeanor, except the violation of certain sections of this title as set forth in section 16.64.030 of this chapter, which shall constitute civil violations. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.64.027: ISSUANCE OF A CIVIL NOTICE OF VIOLATION: A. Every notice issued under this chapter shall be issued in the form of a written civil notice and shall contain a statement that the named party may appeal the imposition of the penalty and provide information regarding how to appeal. B. Any driver, vehicle owner, or business that violates any provision of this chapter may be named in a civil notice issued by the City. A violation of any provision of this chapter by any driver or vehicle owner shall also constitute a violation of such provision by the business under whose authority such driver or owner was operating at the time of the violation. (Ord. 10-19, 2019) 16.64.030: CIVIL PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT: A. Any person or entity in violation of this title, department rules and regulations, or other applicable law is subject to civil penalties and any other lawful action as may be taken by the Department Director to ensure the safe and effective operations of the airport. B. The City may revoke, suspend, or deny renewal of a City business license to operate a business for violation of any provision of this title, department rules and regulations, or other applicable law as provided under title 5, chapter 5.02 of this Code. C. The department may revoke, suspend or deny renewal of an operator's badge, department automated vehicle identification tag, or department inspection seal for violation of any provision of this title, department rules and regulations, or other applicable law. The person or business affected may request, in writing filed with the department, an appeal hearing before the Ground Transportation Appeal Committee. Any such revocation, suspension or denial of renewal shall remain in effect until the party against whom such action is taken requests reinstatement, and the Ground Transportation Appeal Committee determines that reinstatement is appropriate. D. If any named party fails to comply with civil penalties imposed under this chapter, such party may be subject to suspension, revocation, or nonrenewal of a City license to operate a business, operator's badge, department automated vehicle identification tag and department inspection seal. E. Civil penalties may be imposed as set forth below. The named party in the civil notice shall be liable for a civil penalty. Any penalty assessed in connection with this section may be in addition to any other penalty that may be imposed by law or department rules and regulations. F. Violations of the following shall constitute civil violations and be subject to the following penalties: Code Amount Of Penalty Violation Code Amount Of Penalty Violation General regulations: 16.12.060 $ 500.00 Commercial activities 16.12.080 500.00 Conduct of general business 16.12.270 200.00 Unauthorized use of roads and walks 16.60.010 500.00 Vehicle operations on airport 16.60.020 1,000.00 Secured area vehicle operations 16.60.030 1,000.00 Ramp area vehicle operations 16.60.040 200.00 Unauthorized passenger load/unload 16.60.050 1,000.00 Failure to report accident 16.60.060 1,000.00 Prohibited vehicle or animal in secure area 16.60.065 200.00 Parking area restrictions/failure to pay fees 16.60.067 100.00 Parking violation posted signs 16.60.075 500.00 Courtesy cart operations Ground transportation businesses: 16.60.095 1,000.00 Unauthorized ground transportation vehicle 16.60.100 200.00 Unauthorized passenger pick up 16.60.120 500.00 Failure to pay fees 16.60.180A,B,D 500.00 Unauthorized solicitation or baggage transport 16.60.190 100.00 Unauthorized staging/use of grounds and facilities 16.60.200 500.00 Unauthorized posting of signs (Ord. 10-19, 2019) 16.64.050: ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES; CIVIL NOTICE OF GROUND TRANSPORTATION VIOLATION: A. Civil notices under this chapter, other than those involving revocations, suspensions, denials or approvals of a business license, operator's badge, department automated vehicle identification tags and department inspection seals shall be heard by the Salt Lake City Justice Court. Any named party may appear before a Hearing Officer and present and contest an alleged violation as provided in title 2, chapter 2.75 of this Code, or its successor. B. The burden to prove any defense shall be upon the person raising such defense. Nothing herein shall affect the City's burden to prove each element of the underlying charge by a preponderance of evidence. C. If the Hearing Officer finds that no violation of this chapter occurred, or that a violation occurred but one or more of the defenses set forth in this section is applicable, the Hearing Officer may dismiss the civil notice and release the named party from liability thereunder, or may reduce the penalty associated therewith as he or she shall determine. Such defenses are: 1. The civil notice does not contain the information required by this chapter; 2. Compliance with the subject ordinances would have presented an imminent and irreparable injury to persons or property; or 3. Such other mitigating circumstances as may be approved by the City Attorney's Office. (Ord. 68-14, 2014) 16.64.060: EXPEDITED APPEAL OF EXCLUSION: Any named party who is excluded from pursuing commercial activities under this chapter, and has not had a hearing before an Appeal Committee regarding such exclusion as provided for in this chapter, may request an expedited appeal of the action that resulted in such exclusion. Such appeal shall be requested in writing by the party so excluded to the department. The department shall promptly investigate the facts relating to such exclusion. If the evidence indicates such exclusion is improper under this chapter, the Department Director may reverse the action that resulted in such exclusion. If the Department Director does not reverse such action, the action resulting in such exclusion shall be heard and determined by an Appeal Committee in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. If a preponderance of the evidence indicates such exclusion is proper under this chapter the Appeal Hearing Committee shall uphold such exclusion. (Ord. 10-19, 2019) MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES AT SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SLC) Adopted ___, 2023 Current as of: January 31, 2023 i Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose & Policy ................................................................................................................1 1.2 General Information ..........................................................................................................2 2. DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................................................4 3. REQUIREMENTS & STANDARDS ...................................................................................10 3.1 FAR Part 91 Aircraft Operations. Not for Hire, Military Operations & FAR Part 121 Aircraft Operations ..........................................................................................10 3.2 Minimum Standards for All Operators .........................................................................11 3.3 Application Procedures and Qualifications ...................................................................15 3.4 Approval Procedures .......................................................................................................17 3.5 Minimum Standards for Full Service Fixed Base Operator (FBO) ............................18 3.6 Minimum Standards for Specialized Aeronautical Service Operators (SASO) ........24 4. VIOLATIONS AND ENFORCEMENT ..............................................................................31 APPENDIX A – MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A WRITTEN APPLICATION......................................................................................................................32 APPENDIX B – SCHEDULE OF MINIMUM INSURANCE .................................................34 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose & Policy The Salt Lake City Department of Airports (SLCDA or Sponsor) will make available the opportunity to engage in commercial and general aviation aeronautical activities at Salt Lake City International Airport (Airport), by persons and entities (Operator(s)) that meet reasonable minimum standards (Minimum Standards). The purpose of imposing these Minimum Standards is to: a. ensure safe, efficient, and adequate levels of services are offered to the public, b. protect airport users from unlicensed and unauthorized products and services, c. maintain and enhance the availability of adequate services for all airport users, d. promote the orderly development of Airport land, e. ensure the economic health of all on-airport Operators, and f. ensure efficient use of navigable airspace. The Minimum Standards are based on the Airport’s status as a large hub primary commercial service facility, circumstances and conditions at the Airport, and analysis of demand and capacity. These Minimum Standards may be periodically updated and revised as activity or demand for various services changes over time, in such a manner and to such extent as is deemed appropriate by SLCDA. These Minimum Standards may be revised or amended at any time in the discretion of SLCDA. SLCDA will apply these Minimum Standards objectively and uniformly to all similarly situated on-airport aeronautical service Operators. In accordance with these objectives, SLCDA will approve or deny the opportunity for an Operator, as defined herein, to conduct aeronautical activities at SLCIA based on these standards. These Minimum Standards are not intended to be comprehensive; Operators must also comply with all applicable federal, state, local law, and SLCDA Rules and Regulations. By adopting these Minimum Standards, SLCDA does not imply a right to provide services to any operator or provider. It is the policy of SLCDA to extend the opportunity for providing an aeronautical service to any entity meeting SLCDA’s Minimum Standards for that service, subject to availability of suitable space at the Airport to conduct such activities. The SLCDA Airport Layout Plan, as approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provides the primary basis for determining whether suitable space is available for proposed aeronautical activities. SLCDA reserves the right to solicit requests for proposals and to make determinations and choices of suitable Operators based on solicited proposals, to fill any on-airport aeronautical service opportunity. 2 1.2 General Information Determinations of what constitutes an acceptable “minimum” and compliance with the Minimum Standards shall be made by SLCDA in its sole discretion. No entity or Operator will be allowed to occupy land and/or improvements or engage in aeronautical activities at the Airport under conditions less than the “minimum,” unless waived in writing by the Executive Director, if determined to be in the best interest of the welfare of Airport operations, in the Executive Director’s sole discretion. These Minimum Standards shall not prohibit any person from performing maintenance and fueling with respect to their Operator-owned or controlled aircraft with their own employees, except for restrictions set forth by any lease or other contractual agreement. Activities may exist which are too varied to reasonably permit the establishment of specific minimum standards for each activity. If an aeronautical activity is not addressed in these Minimum Standards, appropriate requirements may be developed on a case-by-case basis and incorporated into any agreement or permit relating to the occupancy/use of Airport land and/or improvements, taking into consideration the needs of the Operator, the existing land-use plans and operational plans of SLCDA, and the public interest in, or demand for, the activity. Upon SLCDA’s adoption of these Minimum Standards, any reference in any agreement to prior standards shall be deemed to be a reference to these Minimum Standards. Any existing Operator that is not currently in compliance with these standards at the time of their adoption shall be given a reasonable time, as determined by SLCDA, to comply with these Minimum Standards. Notwithstanding the adoption of these Minimum Standards, nothing herein shall be construed as a modification of any existing agreements wherein an Operator has agreed to exceed any of these Minimum Standards nor is SLCDA prohibited from entering into agreements wherein an Operator is required to exceed these Minimum Standards. SLCDA may prohibit any Operator from using the Airport or engaging in commercial aeronautical activities at the Airport if SLCDA determines the Operator is not complying with these Minimum Standards or has otherwise jeopardized the safety of other individuals or entities utilizing the Airport or the land and/or improvements at the Airport. If the Executive Director determines that any of these Minimum Standards have been violated by any individual or entity operating on the Airport and that the matter cannot be resolved satisfactorily by notice to, and discussion with, the offending entity, then SLCDA may take formal action against the offending entity. Such action shall be at the sole discretion of SLCDA. SLCDA reserves the right to waive all, or any portion of, these Minimum Standards set forth herein for the benefit of any government or governmental agency performing non-profit and/or public services to the aircraft industry, performing emergency medical or rescue services to the public by means of aircraft, performing fire prevention or firefighting operations, or performing law enforcement operations. SLCDA further reserves the right to waive all or any portion of these Minimum Standards for non-government entities/Operators when the entity or Operator is solely engaged in performing emergency medical or rescue services to the public by means of aircraft, performing fire prevention or firefighting operations, or whenever Executive Director, in 3 their sole discretion, deems such waiver to be in the best interest or welfare of the Airport’s operation. The operation of the Airport is subject to the various requirements imposed by the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, the regulations imposed by the Federal Aviation Administration, and regulations imposed by other federal agencies. The foregoing requirements and regulations shall take precedence and supersede these Minimum Standards should they contradict or conflict with these Minimum Standards solely to the extent that they contradict or conflict. 4 2. DEFINITIONS All words, terms and phrases when used herein shall have the meanings as described in this section. Words, terms, and phrases which relate to aeronautical practices, processes and equipment, not defined herein, shall be construed according to the definitions in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations or, if not defined therein, according to their general usage in the aviation industry. 2.1 Aeronautical Activity or Aeronautical Service Any activity or service that involves, makes possible, or is required for the operation of aircraft, or another aeronautical activity, that contributes to or is required for the safety of such operations. The following activities, without limitation, that are commonly conducted on airports are considered aeronautical activities within this definition: general and corporate aviation, air taxi and charter operations, scheduled and nonscheduled air carrier operations, pilot training, aircraft rental and sightseeing, aerial photography, crop dusting, aerial advertising and surveying, aircraft sales and services, aircraft storage, sale of aviation petroleum products, repair and maintenance of aircraft, sale of aircraft parts, parachute or ultralight activities, and any other activity which, in the sole judgement of the SLCDA, because of its direct relationship to the operation of aircraft or the Airport, can be appropriately regarded as an aeronautical activity. 2.2 Air Carrier The aircraft and associated operator of commercial scheduled aircraft operating under a FAR Part 121 Air Carrier Certificate. 2.3 Aircraft Aircraft means a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air. See 14 CFR § 1.1. 2.4 Aircraft Maintenance Aircraft maintenance is considered to be the repair, maintenance, alteration, preservation, or inspection of aircraft (including the replacement of parts). Major maintenance includes major alterations to the airframe, powerplant, and propellers as defined in federal regulation (14 CFR Part 43). Minor maintenance includes normal, routine annual inspection with attendant maintenance, repair, calibration, or adjustment of aircraft and its accessories. Aircraft assembly is included within the definition of aircraft maintenance. 2.5 Aircraft Charter Operator An entity engaged in the commercial operation of providing air transportation of person(s) or property for hire on an on-demand basis, operating under 14 CFR Part 135 and not including Air Carriers. This section does not apply to life flight helicopter and rescue Operators. 5 2.6 Aircraft Maintenance Operator An entity engaged in providing Aircraft Maintenance for aircraft not owned and/or operated by the Operator. An Aircraft Maintenance Operator provides one or a combination of airframe, powerplant (engine), or accessory overhauls and/or repair services on aircraft up to and including business jet aircraft and helicopters. This activity also includes the sale of aircraft parts and accessories. 2.7 Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic (A&P Mechanic) Someone holding an FAA authorized aircraft mechanic certificate with both airframe and powerplant ratings. 2.8 Aircraft Owner The FAA registered owner of an aircraft, or their authorized designee. 2.9 Aircraft Refueling The transportation, sale, delivery, dispensing, storage, or draining of fuel or fuel waste products to or from aircraft. 2.10 Aircraft Rental The commercial operation of renting or leasing aircraft to the public or another Operator for compensation. 2.11 Aircraft Rental Operator An entity engaged in the rental of aircraft to the general public or another Operator. 2.12 Aircraft Sales The sale of new or used aircraft through brokerage, ownership, franchise, distributorship, or licensed dealership. 2.13 Aircraft Sales Operator An entity engaged in the sale of new or used aircraft or aircraft parts and provides such repair, services, and parts as necessary to meet any maintenance/service guarantee or warranty or to support the maintenance of aircraft sold. Storage of aircraft sold falls into the category of Commercial Hangar Operator, defined herein. 2.14 Airport Airport refers to the land and improvements generally known and designated as the Salt Lake City International Airport. The improvements on the land consist of the runways, aircraft taxiways and parking aprons, the passenger and freight terminal buildings, hangars, vehicle roads and parking facilities, and all other improvements on such land. The term Airport shall also 6 include any adjacent or nearby land hereafter acquired for purposes of the Airport and all improvements hereafter constructed on such land. 2.15 Airport Operations Area (AOA) The area of the Airport used for aircraft landing, takeoff, or surface maneuvering including the areas around hangars, navigation equipment, and communication facilities. 2.16 Airport Security Plan (ASP) The plan required by the Transportation Security Administration which defines how the Airport Sponsor will adhere to and maintain the security requirements of 49 CFR Parts 1542 and1544. 2.17 Airport Layout Plan (ALP) The FAA approved plan of an airport and showing the layout of existing and proposed facilities. 2.18 Apron The apron is a surface in the Air Operations Area (AOA) where aircraft park and are serviced, refueled, loaded with cargo, and accessed by passengers. 2.19 Commercial That which promotes or makes possible earnings, income, revenue, compensation, profits, exchanges (including change of services), trading, buying, hiring, or selling of commodities, goods, services, or tangible or intangible property of any kind, whether or not such objectives are accomplished. 2.20 Commercial Hangar Operator An entity that develops, constructs, leases, and/or owns a hangar structure(s) for the sole purpose of subleasing hangar space (with or without associated office/shop space) to entities engaged in commercial and/or non-commercial Aeronautical Activities. 2.21 Exclusive Right A power, privilege, or other right excluding or debarring another person or entity from enjoying or exercising a like/similar power, privilege, or right. An Exclusive Right may be conferred either by express agreement, by imposition of unreasonable standards or requirements, or by other means. Such a right conferred on one of more parties but excluding others from enjoying or exercising a similar right, would be an exclusive right. The granting of an Exclusive Right to conduct an aeronautical activity on an airport developed or improved with federal funds is expressly forbidden by law. 2.22 Executive Director The Executive Director of the Salt Lake City Department of Airports or designee.