HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/2021 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
and
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
and
LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY
FORMAL MEETING AGENDA
June 15, 2021 Tuesday 7:00 PM
This Meeting Will be an Electronic Meeting Pursuant to the Chair’s
Determination.
SLCCouncil.com
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Amy Fowler, Chair
District 7
James Rogers, Vice Chair
District 1
Dennis Faris
District 2
Chris Wharton
District 3
Ana Valdemoros
District 4
Darin Mano
District 5
Dan Dugan
District 6
Generated: 15:36:33
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination.
As Salt Lake City Council Chair, I hereby determine that conducting the Salt Lake City Council
meeting at an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who
may be present, and that the City and County building has been ordered closed to the public for
health and safety reasons.
Members of the public are encouraged to participate in meetings. We want to make sure
everyone interested in the City Council meetings can still access the meetings how they feel most
comfortable. If you are interested in watching the City Council meetings, they are available on
the following platforms:
•Facebook Live: www.facebook.com/slcCouncil/
•YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
•Web Agenda: www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
•SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Formal Meeting for the Public Hearings or
general comment period, you may do so through the Webex platform. To learn how to connect
through Webex, or if you need call-in phone options, please visit our website or call us at 801-
535-7607 to learn more.
As always, if you would like to provide feedback or comment, please call us or send us an email:
•24-Hour comment line: 801-535-7654
•council.comments@slcgov.com
More info and resources can be found at: www.slc.gov/council/contact-us/
Upcoming meetings and meeting information can be found
here: www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
Based on feedback we have received, we will be going back to our regular Formal Meeting
format. Public hearings will be heard in the order on the agenda followed by a general comment
session later in the meeting.
LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES
A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
Council/Board Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings.
2.
Pledge of Allegiance.
3.
Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
B.LBA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Resolution: Local Building Authority Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the
Local Building Authority (LBA) of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22, including
the Capital Projects Fund.
The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-22 only includes the bond
debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects
throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA
is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for
capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks,
public buildings, and street projects.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
C.LBA ADJOURNMENT:
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
D.RDA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Resolution: RDA Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2020-21
The Board will consider adopting a resolution amending the final budget of the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget
amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments in the
Redevelopment Agency’s budget, including proposed project additions and
modifications, and staffing changes. The amendment includes adjusting estimated
property tax increment revenues based on actual amounts received, additional
funding for Station Center public infrastructure in the Depot District, a to-be-
decided catalytic development along North Temple, a new community and cultural
initiative in the Granary District, and other changes.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 13, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 2 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
2. Resolution: Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 18, 2021; Tuesday, June 1, 2021; and Tuesday, June 8,
2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
E.RDA ADJOURNMENT:
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
F.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.
The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday, February
16, 2021; as well as the formal meeting minutes for February 2, 2021 and February
16, 2021.
2.
The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2021 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake
City.
G.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Items G1-G8 will be heard as one public hearing
1. Grant Application: 9-Line Railroad Crossing: Transportation
Investment Fund-Active Transportation (TIF-Active) Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). If
awarded, this grant would fund the construction of a bridge or tunnel for the 9-
Line Trail at approximately 650 West to provide safe passage for pedestrians and
cyclists over or under the freight and passenger rail. The requested funding is
based on a planning level cost estimated from similar structures and may change
as a more detailed site analysis is completed.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
2. Grant Application: Red Butte Creek Trail Investment Fund-Active
Transportation (TIF-Active) Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Division of Transportation to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). If
awarded, this grant would fund the construction of a paved multi-use trail that
follows the Red Butte Creek Corridor. The one mile stretch of trail will cross next
to or near the creek via a new underpass under Foothill Drive and connect to the
University of Utah’s family student housing and the Veterans Affairs campus.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
3. Grant Application: 2022 Police Reform and Racial Justice Program
Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Police Department to the United States Conference of Mayors. The Police
Department applied for the Target Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant
Program to enhance its mental health and law enforcement co-responder
initiative. If awarded, this grant would fund immigrant and minority outreach and
education, expanded co-responder team coverage and equipment, and training.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
4. Grant Application: Rose Park Bicycle Pump Track Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Public Services to the Governor’s Office of Economic
Development. If awarded, this grant would fund the construction of a new bicycle
pump track adjacent to the Day-Riverside Library along the Jordan River Parkway
Trail within the Rose Park neighborhood. Local community groups will be asked
for feedback to design and develop a unique bicycling amenity that will help
activate this open space along the Jordan River and provide a new recreational
feature to the Jordan River Parkway trail.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
5. Grant Application: PaddleShare: Facilitating Self-serve Kayak Rental
on the Jordan River
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Public Services to the Governor’s Office of Economic
Development. If awarded, this grant would fund construction of kayak
lockers/stations. Stations will include an enclosed locker system, with multiple
lockers containing all the equipment a user needs to paddle on the Jordan River to
a downstream station.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
6. Grant Application: Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence
Advocate Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Office of the City Attorney to the Utah Office for Victims of Crime. If awarded,
this grant would fund a victim advocate to assist and support victims of domestic
violence as their cases move to the prosecution and adjudication phases. The
services include: information; education and advocacy through the case and
prosecution; assistance with victim impact statements; and support and
accompaniment to court and meetings with investigators and prosecutors. The
Victim Advocate also assists in post-release safety planning, preparation for court
appearances, and jail release agreements.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
7. Grant Application: Social Impact Bond Study (EDA CARES Act
COVID-19 Recovery Technical Assistance Grant)
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Economic Development to the Wasatch Front Regional Council. If
awarded, this grant would fund a consultant to work with the Department of
Economic Development to perform a Social Impact Bond Study. The study will
assess economic and opportunity disparities with particular focus on Salt Lake
City’s west side and propose interventions that may help mitigate these
disparities. Additionally, the study will identify financing mechanisms to invest in
the interventions highlighted in the study.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
8. Grant Application: 2022 Police Traffic Services Equipment Program
Grant
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, this grant
would fund the purchase of 100 traffic cones and 50 barricades. These items will
be used by the Motor Squad for traffic control during special events, restricting or
diverting traffic due to accidents, and other similar uses.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2020-21
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for
the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget amendments happen several
times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed
project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes a request
to increase the Library’s General Fund budget to account for pass-through
property tax revenue collected by Salt Lake County which goes directly to the Utah
Inland Port Authority and the Convention Facility.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 18, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 18, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 9 for Fiscal Year 2020-21
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the final
budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal
Year 2020-21. The proposed amendment includes funding for building office
space to accommodate expansion of the Emergency Management Division,
technology upgrades for the 911 Department, and reimbursements to the Fire
Department, among other changes.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 4, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 4, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Ordinances listed below (H3-H14) are associated with the
implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake
City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22.
3. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions
of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2021-
22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to
implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American
Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004,
representing eligible employees.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
4. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the
International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees pursuant to
the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated
March 22, 2011, which shall become effective on proper ratification and signature.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
5. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions
of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association
of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary
funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the
International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
6. Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-represented employees of
Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan
for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
7. Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions
of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police
Association for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to
implement, for Fiscal Year 2021-22, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake
Police Association, representing eligible employees.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
8. Ordinance: Approving an MOU between Salt Lake City and the Salt
Lake City Police Association
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Police
Association, representing eligible employees for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
9. Ordinance: Adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the
Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy,
including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within
Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
10. Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake
City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the
Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-22.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
11. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending various fees and fee
information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
12. Ordinance: Work in the Public Way Fees
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt
Lake City Code relating to definitions and fees of work in the public way.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
13. Ordinance: City Departments Organizational Changes
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending sections of the Salt
Lake City Code relating to the organizational changes with the Department of
Public Services, the proposed Department of Public Lands, and the Department
of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN). The Mayor's proposed budget would
transfer the Engineering Division and Youth and Family Division between the
CAN and Public Services Departments.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
14. Ordinances relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 City Budget, excluding
the budget for the Library Fund
The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt
Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately
adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for
Fiscal Year 2021-22.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday,
June 1, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
I.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2.Comments to the City Council. (Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing, as well as on any other City business. Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
J.NEW BUSINESS:
NONE.
K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NONE.
L.CONSENT:
1. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 850 and 870 East
2100 South
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of
properties at approximately 850 and 870 East 2100 South. The proposal would
rezone the properties from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to CSHBD2 (Sugar
House Business District) and would amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future
Land Use Map. The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map in
the Sugar House Master Plan from "Mixed Use - Low Intensity" to "Business
District Mixed-Use - Neighborhood Scale." The intent of the request is to allow
more flexibility to develop a future multi-family residential, office, or mixed-use
development. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another
zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition No.: PLNPCM2020-00906
and 00925.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
2. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 810 East 800
South
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map
for a parcel of property at 810 East 800 South. The proposal would rezone the
parcel from R-2 (Single- and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community
Business District) and would amend the Central Community Future Land Use
Map from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. The applicant
submitted preliminary development plans for a two-story building that would
have commercial space on the first floor, residential units on the second floor, and
parking located to the rear. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property
to another zoning district with similar characteristics. Petition
No.: PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 20, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
3. Board Appointment: Art Design Board – Meggie Troili
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Meggie Troili to the Art
Design Board for a term ending June 15, 2024.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
4. Board Appointment: Art Design Board – Tiffini Porter
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Tiffini Porter to the Art
Design Board for a term ending June 15, 2024.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
5. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City – William
Davis
The Council will consider approving the appointment of William Davis to the
Housing Authority of Salt Lake City for a term ending June 15, 2025.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
6. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board (PCRB) – Justin
Rodriguez
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Justin Rodriguez to the
PCRB for a term ending September 2, 2024.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
7. Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule for Fiscal Year 2021-22
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m. to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending various fees and fee
information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 13, 2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
M.ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m. on _____________________, the undersigned, duly appointed City
Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
TO:LBA Board Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
Item B1
MOTION SHEET
LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY
RE:MOTION SHEET –Local Building Authority Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22
MOTION 1 – ADOPT
I move that the Board approve a resolution adopting the Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22 of the Capital
Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority.
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Board not approve the resolution
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
1
Resolution No. ____ of 2021
(Adopting the Final Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority
of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2021-2022)
A Resolution Adopting the Final Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local
Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the remainder of the Fiscal Year Beginning July
1, 2021 and Ending June 30, 2022.
PREAMBLE
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council has created the Local Building Authority of Salt
Lake City, Utah (the “Building Authority”), and has appointed Mary Beth Thompson as the
Budget Officer of the Building Authority (the “Budget Officer”); and
WHEREAS, the Budget Officer previously filed with the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of the Building Authority a tentative budget for the capital projects fund of the
Building Authority (the Building Authority not having any operational expenses and therefore no
need for an operating budget); and
WHEREAS, on __________, 2021, the Board adopted the tentative budget by Resolution
No. ____ of 2021; and
WHEREAS, the tentative budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and
data was a public record in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, available for
public inspection for a period of at least ten days before the adoption of the final budget; and
WHEREAS, following due notice of a public hearing given at least seven days before the
hearing (a) by posting in three public places within Salt Lake City, Utah and (b) by publishing on
the Utah Public Notice Website created in Utah Code Section 63A-12-201, at its ___________,
2021, and ________, 2021 meetings, the Board held a public hearing on the budget tentatively
adopted, at which hearing all interested persons in attendance or connected remotely were given
---
2
an opportunity to be heard on the estimates of revenues and expenditures or any item in the
tentative budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Local Building
Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows:
1. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt a final budget for the capital projects
fund of the Building Authority for fiscal year 2021-2022. All conditions precedent to the
adoption of the final budget have been accomplished.
2. The budget attached hereto and made a part of this resolution shall be, and the
same hereby is adopted as, the final budget for the capital projects fund of the Building Authority
for the remainder of the fiscal year 2021-2022, in accordance with the Fiscal Procedures for
Local Districts Act, Utah Code Title 17B, Chapter 1, Part 6.
3. The Budget Officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of
said final budget in the office of the Secretary of the Building Authority, whose permanent office
is located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 but which office is
temporarily located at 349 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84111, as required by Utah Code
Section 17B-1-615. Said final budget shall be available to the public for inspection during
regular business hours.
4. The Budget Officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of
said final budget with the State Auditor as required by Utah Code Section 17B-1-614 within 30
days after its adoption.
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its approval and adoption.
3
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah,
this ____ day of _____________________, 2021.
PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM
______________________________
Boyd Ferguson, Senior City Attorney
Date: ________________________
Boyd Ferguson
Item D1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:RDA Board Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: Budget Amendment #1 of Fiscal Year 2020-2021
MOTION 1 – ADOPT
I move that the Board adopt a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 final budget of the
Redevelopment Agency as proposed by the Administration with the Granary District Community & Cultural
Initiative funding going into a holding account.
Staff note: the $288,173 from the Granary District for Community & Cultural Initiative item will return to the
Board when specific project / program proposals are available
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Board not adopt the proposed budget amendment and proceed to the next agenda item.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget and Policy Analyst
DATE:June 1, 2021
RE: Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
Budget Amendment Number One FY2021
________________________________________________________________________________
RDA Budget Amendment Number One includes requested changes to 11 project areas and funds. Total expenditures
are $14,036871. There is a total of 50 items in this amendment. Most of the proposed items are true-up adjustments
based on actual property tax increment received. The annual budget uses a conservative forecasting of property tax
increment which results in an end of fiscal year amendment to recognize and adjust budgets based on actual (in this
case higher) tax increment revenues.
LEGALLY REQUIRED ITEMS
Many items in the budget amendment are legal requirements for the RDA which mostly fall into three categories:
Taxing entity payments which are pass throughs from the RDA to the School District or Salt Lake County.
Tax increment reimbursements to property owners that have agreements with the RDA. If certain
conditions are met, then a portion of their property taxes is reimbursed. This is called post-performance
because the reimbursement is only provided after the property owner has met the conditions and the
County Assessor confirms higher property values.
State law affordable housing set aside which is required only for some project areas which mostly goes to
the primary housing fund (can be used citywide).
DISCRETIONARY ITEMS
The items below are not legal requirements of the RDA. If desired, the Board could decide to take additional time to
consider some or all the items below and could decline to fund any of the items.
A. $568,354 request for Central Business District (CBD) Commercial Development Loan Program (page 2 of
transmittal from excess CBD tax increment revenue)
o If approved, then the loan program would have $818,354 available to lend in the CBD and does not
lapse to Fund Balance at the end of a fiscal year
o The Administration is working on revising the loan guidelines which would require Board approval
o There are currently no applications in the pipeline for these funds
o The Board may wish to ask:
▪What is the timeline for revising the loan guidelines?
▪How is the CBD loan program different than the RDA’s Revolving Loan Fund?
Project Timeline:
Set Date: April 13, 2021
1st Briefing: May 18, 2021
Public Hearing: May 18, 2021
2nd Briefing: June 1, 2021
Potential Action: June 8, 2021
Page | 2
B. $594,673 request for the Eccles Theater Debt Service Reserve Fund (page 2 of transmittal from excess CBD tax
increment revenue)
o If approved, then the reserve fund would have a balance of $2,132,122
o From FY21 to FY29 there’s a $7.5 million projected shortfall in revenues to cover bond payments
o An updated forecast is being developed with the Finance Department
o The Board may wish to ask the Administration for a timeline on the updated forecast to
account for the pandemic’s impact on Eccles Theater operations and the RDA’s
financial liability.
C. $959,009 request for Station Center infrastructure in the Depot District (page 3 of transmittal from excess
Depot District revenue)
o FY22 annual budget is also requesting $332,179
o If both requests are approved, then the total project budget would be $11,178,513
o The total estimated cost for Station Center is $14 million to $16 million based on current designs which
means a funding gap of approximately $3 million to $5 million
o The Board may wish to ask the Administration for a timeline on when construction is
planned and how the funding gap could be addressed or if current designs could be
brought within the approved lower budget level.
D. $288,173 request for a Community and Cultural Initiative in the Granary District (page 3 of transmittal from
excess Granary District revenue)
o FY22 annual budget is also requesting $443,731
o This is a new program so the funds would go into a holding account until the Board approves criteria
and a process
o The Board may wish to ask the Administration:
▪What are the goals of this new program and how does it align with the RDA's
recently updated guiding framework (see Attachment 2)?
▪What can the program accomplish before the Granary District stops collecting
tax increment in two years?
▪How would interested parties find out about this new program?
▪Will the process be first come first served or will criteria provide prioritization?
E. $144,419 request for a North Temple Catalytic Development (page 4 of transmittal from excess North Temple
revenue)
o FY22 annual budget also requesting $289,268
o If both requests are approved, then the catalytic development fund would have a balance of $1,293,252
o There is neither a specific property identified for these funds nor criteria for what qualifies as catalytic
o The Board may wish to discuss if the funding level is sufficient to meet goals for the
North Temple corridor.
F. $176,611 in 9-Line and State Street Project Area Seed Funds (page 6 of transmittal from excess Program
Income Fund (PIF) revenue)
o If the request is approved, then the total seed funds budget would be $2,181,826. Of that amount
$750,000 was fronted by the RDA to build the new 650 South Main Street TRAX Station contingent
upon adjacent developments reimbursing the RDA
o Note that these funds are flexible between the two project areas and are not limited to one or the other
o The Board may wish to discuss if the funding level is sufficient to meet goals for the two
new project areas or if there’s interest to identify additional funding to invest during
the early years of 9-Line and State Street project areas.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Station Center Map with Proposed New Streets
2. RDA Guiding Framework
ACRONYMS
CBD – Central Business District PIF – Program Income Fund
FY – Fiscal Year RDA – Redevelopment Agency
ATTACHMENT A
Station Center Site Plan
October 18, 2019
Guiding Framework
This Guiding Framework is a strategic operational document outlining the methodology for evaluating and prioritizing projects requesting RDA financial assistance. The RDA’s
Mission and Values form the foundation of the Guiding Framework, declaring the RDA’s purpose and the intended economic, social, and physical outcomes expected of RDA
projects and partnerships.
MISSION: The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City revitalizes neighborhoods and business districts to improve livability, spark economic growth, and foster
authentic communities, serving as a catalyst for strategic development projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public
spaces, and environmental sustainability.
VALUES: Economic Growth-
We act as a responsible steward of public funds,
taking a long-term view of investment, return,
and property values.
Community Impact-
We prioritize projects and programs that
demonstrate commitment to improving equity
and quality of life for residents and businesses
in Salt Lake City.
Neighborhood Vibrancy-
We cultivate distinct and livable built
environments that are contextually sensitive,
resilient, connected, and sustainable.
PROJECT EVALUATION PROCESS: In the context of the Mission and Values, the RDA evaluates projects via three steps, which answer the following questions: 1.) Does the
project meet the minimum THRESHOLDS required for RDA participation? 2.) To what degree does the project benefit the public by achieving defined LIVABILITY BENCHMARKS,
thereby warranting RDA assistance? 3.) Does the project meet the CRITERIA outlined in existing RDA programs and policies, such as the RDA Loan Program or Tax Increment
Reimbursement Program?
*Spanning a 1-3 year time frame, Project Area Work Plans identify redevelopment objectives and strategic redevelopment projects for each project area, along with a corresponding schedule & budget for each project. The Project Area Work Plans
will be based on relevant City policies and plans and the Project Area Plans that were adopted when the project area was created and will provide direction for the annual RDA budget process.
Step 1:
THRESHOLDS
Alignment with adopted City policies & plans
Alignment with Project Area Work Plans*
Financial viability with a demonstrated and reasonable need for public assistance
Step 2:
LIVABILITY
BENCHMARKS
Economic Growth
Leveraging
Timeliness
Return of Investment
Permanent Job Creation & Retention
Business Districts
Targeted Resources
Community Impact
Public Space
Transit Opportunities
Local Business Opportunities
Mixed-Income Neighborhoods
Neighborhood Safety
Public Art
Community Support
Neighborhood Vibrancy
Quality Materials
Site & Urban Design
Building Design & Architecture
Sustainability
Walkability
Historic Preservation
Adaptive Reuse
Step 3:
PROGRAM
CRITERIA
Evaluation of project according to respective RDA policies, programs and procedures
EXHIBIT “A” TO RESOLUTION
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: ________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City RDA Board DATE: May 3, 2021
Ana Valdemoros, RDA Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: RDA Budget Amendment #1, FY2020-21
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403 or
Mike Burns (801) 565-6461 or
Danny Walz
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: Review and discuss the proposed First Amendment to the Annual
RDA Budget for Fiscal Year 2021. Set public hearing date for adoption of the amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
RDA FUND $ 13,781,124.00 $ 14,036,871.00
RDA CIP FUND 0.00 0.00
TOTAL $ 13,781,124.00 $ 14,036,871.00
Lisa Shaffer (May 5, 2021 11:08 MDT)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The purpose of the First Amendment (“Amendment”) is to allocate the actual amount of TI
received for FY21.
A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The
Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The
budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution
B. RDA Staff Memo
C. Budget Amendment #1 Summary Spreadsheet
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCRDA.COM
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY WALZ
Director
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF MEMO
DATE: April 29, 2021
PREPARED BY: Danny Walz
RE: RDA Budget Amendment #1, FY 2020-2021
REQUESTED ACTION: Discuss and consider the adoption of the proposed First Amendment to the
Annual RDA Budget for Fiscal Year 2021.
BUDGET IMPACTS: The First Amendment identifies appropriations for Agency operations and
projects across multiple funds.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of the First Amendment (“Amendment”) is to allocate funds
from the 2020 tax increment received across multiple funds. The bulk of allocations are a function of the
increased tax increment and involve adjustments based on the actual receipt of funds. The remaining
allocations increase funding for existing Agency projects and programs with the exception of a new
initiative proposed as part of the Agency’s FY22 budget.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES: This Budget Amendment provides for adjustments across multiple funds within
the Agency budget for Fiscal Year 2021. The adjustments fall into the following categories and
descriptions:
Central Business
District
Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$25,066,500 $6,094,198 $31,160,698 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received
Taxing Entity
Payments
$15,039,900 $3,656,519 $18,696,419 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received and
refunded to Taxing Entities
Eccles Debt Service
Match
$2,638,112 $1,109,229 $3,747,340 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received and
allocated to Eccles Debt Service
Transfer to Admin $2,506,650 ($14,576) $2,492,074 Allocation towards City Admin
costs
Commercial
Development Loan
Program
$250,000 $568,354 $818,354 Additional allocation available for
commercial loans within project
area
TI Reimbursement
Vivint Arena
$700,000 $50,000 $750,000 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
TI Reimbursement
222 South Main
$500,000 $130,000 $630,000 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
Debt Service
Reserve
$1,537,449 $594,673 $2,132,122 Additional allocation towards debt
service reserves
Commercial Development Loan Program Allocation of funds for lending toward projects that expand
commercial development within the Central Business District.
Reimbursement Payments - Per the respective tax increment reimbursement agreements with the property
owners these are the annual reimbursement payments based on the amount the projects qualify for.
Eccles Debt Service Reserve - The tax increment collection for the Eccles Theater projected a potential
shortfall in debt service payments for a few years that would need to be covered by the CBD project area.
The purpose of this allocation is to set aside funds in anticipation of covering the shortfall.
West Capitol Hill Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$100,000 $526,903 $626,903 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and adjustment of
previous TI allocations
300 West $0 $395,177 $395,177 Additional allocation towards
infrastructure project
Taxing Entity
Payment
$0 $131,726 $131,726 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and refunded to
Taxing Entities
300 West - The Agency is required to allocate tax increment funds to the project as a term of the Project
Area's extension (Interlocal Agreement for West Capitol Hill project area, 2013). Infrastructure
improvements including street trees and landscaping, improved pedestrian crossings, and traffic calming
features for 300 West from North Temple to 1000 North.
Depot District Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$3,844,278 $1,531,260 $5,375,538 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received
Primary Housing
Fund
$768,856 $306,251 $1,075,107 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received and fulfills
statutory allocation toward
affordable housing development
Station Center
Infrastructure
$0 $959,009 $959,009 Additional allocation towards
infrastructure project
TI Reimbursement
Gateway
$1,200,000 $175,000 $1,375,000 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
TI Reimbursement
Alta Gateway
$260,000 $100,000 $360,000 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
TI Reimbursement
Liberty Gateway
$94,000 $41,000 $135,000 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
TI Reimbursement
Cicero
$50,000 ($50,000) $0 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
Station Center - Project consists of the construction of three new streets, reconstruction of an existing
street, utility upgrades, and streetscape improvements to implement the Depot District Project Area Plan
and Downtown Master Plan. The infrastructure improvements have been planned in order to facilitate
private investment in the neighborhood.
Reimbursement Payments - Per the respective tax increment reimbursement agreements with the property
owners these are the annual reimbursement payments based on the amount the projects qualify for.
Granary District Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$608,945 $317,716 $926,661 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received
Primary Housing
Fund
$121,789 $63,543 $185,332 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and fulfills
statutory allocation toward affordable
housing development
Community and
Cultural Initiatives
$0 $288,173 $288,173 Allocation towards new (FY22)
initiative to support public arts and
cultural programming
TI Reimbursement
Artspace Commons
$34,000 ($34,000) $0 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
Community and Cultural Initiatives - New initiative proposed as part of Agency’s FY22 budget to support
public arts and cultural programming within the project area.
Reimbursement Payments - Per the respective tax increment reimbursement agreements with the property
owners these are the annual reimbursement payments based on the amount the projects qualify for.
North Temple Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$426,810 $206,313 $633,123 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received
Primary Housing
Fund
$85,362 $41,263 $126,625 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and fulfills
statutory allocation toward affordable
housing development
10% School Fund $42,681 $20,631 $63,312 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and fulfills ILA
requirement for School District set
aside
Catalytic Project $270,086 $144,419 $414,505 Additional allocation towards catalytic
project
Catalytic Project – Additional funding towards projects intended to encourage investment in the North
Temple project area.
Block 70 Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Transfer from CBD
Debt Service Match
$2,638,112 $1,109,228 $3,747,340 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received and
allocated to Eccles Debt Service
Transfer from CBD
Debt Service
Reserve
$1,537,449 $594,673 $2,132,122 Additional allocation towards debt
service reserves
Tax Increment
Revenue
$1,884,631 $261,192 $2,145,823 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received
Taxing Entity
Payment
$565,390 $78,357 $643,747 Allocation is a function of actual
Tax Increment received and
refunded to Taxing Entities.
Reserves for Eccles
Debt Service
$480,959 $1,786,736 $2,267,695 Reserves for Eccles debt service
payments
Fundraising
Fulfillment
$150,000 $100,000 $250,000 Additional allocation available for
fulfillment of fundraising
obligations
Reserves for Eccles Debt Service – As part of the payment schedule for debt service on the Eccles
Theater the reserves are meant to cover years in which tax increment may be insufficient.
Fundraising Fulfillment - Per the respective donor agreements as part of the theater fundraising efforts,
the Agency reimburses the theater operator and contractors for costs associated with fulfilling the
respective obligations.
North Temple
Viaduct
Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$1,158,313 $942,215 $2,100,528 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received
Debt Service
Payment to Salt
Lake City
$1,142,438 $928,082 $2,070,520 Allocation towards infrastructure
project as per Interlocal Agreement
Agency Admin $17,375 $14,133 $31,508 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and allocated
toward Agency admin costs
Stadler Rail Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$0 $101,927 $101,927 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received
Appropriation of
Fund Balance
$0 $69,903 $69,903 Appropriation of Tax Increment
received in FY20
TI Reimbursement $0 $146,056 $146,056 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
Primary Housing
Fund
$0 $17,183 $17,183 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and fulfills
statutory allocation toward affordable
housing development
Agency Admin $0 $8,591 $8,591 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and allocated
toward Agency admin costs
Reimbursement Payments - Per the respective tax increment reimbursement agreements with the property
owners these are the annual reimbursement payments based on the amount the projects qualify for.
NWQ Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Tax Increment
Revenue
$0 $1,684,441 $1,684,441 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received
Appropriation of
Fund Balance
$0 $197 $197 Appropriation of Tax Increment
received in FY20
TI Reimbursement $0 $1,179,247 $1,179,247 Allocation is a function of actual
qualified reimbursement
Primary Housing
Fund
$0 $168,464 $168,464 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and fulfills
statutory allocation toward affordable
housing development
Shared Costs $0 $168,464 $168,464 Allocation is a function of
Development Agreement for set aside
toward future infrastructure costs
Agency Admin $0 $168,463 $168,463 Allocation is a function of actual Tax
Increment received and allocated
toward Agency admin costs
Reimbursement Payments - Per the respective tax increment reimbursement agreements with the property
owners these are the annual reimbursement payments based on the amount the projects qualify for.
Program Income Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Project Area Seed
Funds
$505,215 $176,611 $681,826 Additional allocation towards initial
projects within new project areas
Agency Admin $176,611 ($176,611) $0 Reduction of PIF contribution toward
Agency Admin costs as a function of
increased contribution from other
project area funds
Primary Housing
Fund
Current
Budget
Proposed
Budget
Change
Proposed
Budget w/
Amendment
Description
Fund Transfers $1,363,779 $596,705 $1,960,484 Additional transfers are a function of
actual Tax Increment received
Housing NOFA $1,363,779 $596,705 $1,960,484 Additional allocation towards Notice
of Funding Availability provided for
within Agency Housing Strategy
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution
B. Budget Amendment #1
1
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
RESOLUTION NO__________
First Budget Amendment
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF SALT LAKE CITY (“RDA”) AMENDING THE FINAL BUDGET OF THE RDA FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2020, the RDA Board of Directors (“Board”) adopted the final
budget of the RDA, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021,
in accordance with the requirements of Section 17C-1-601.5 of the Utah Code.
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to amend the RDA's budget have been accomplished.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Resolution is to amend the final budget of the RDA,
as approved, ratified and finalized by the RDA Board on June 9, 2020.
2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments shown on Exhibit A as “Board
Approved” are hereby adopted and incorporated into the budget of the RDA.
3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The Salt Lake City Finance
Department, on behalf of the RDA, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said
budget amendments in the office of the Finance Department, the RDA, and the office of the City
Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah,
this ___ day of ______________, 2021, to be effective upon adoption.
________________________________
Ana Valdemoros, Chair
Approved as to form: __________________________________
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Allison Parks
Date:____________________________
April 28, 2021
2
The Executive Director:
____ does not request reconsideration
____ requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting.
_________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Attest:
_________________________
City Recorder
3
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION
[Attach Board’s Final Approved Budget Amendment]
Initiative Number/Name Project Area Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 CBD 6,094,198.00 6,094,198.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 WCH 526,903.00 526,903.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 DD 1,531,260.00 1,531,260.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 GD 317,716.00 317,716.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 NT 206,313.00 206,313.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 B70 1,965,093.00 1,965,093.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 NTV 942,215.00 942,215.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 SR 101,927.00 171,830.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 NWQ 1,684,441.00 1,684,638.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 CWH 411,058.00 596,705.00 One-time -
1 RDA Budget Amendment 1 PIF - - One-time -
-
Total of Budget Amendment Items 13,781,124.00 14,036,871.00 - -
Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1:
Redevelopment Agency RDA 13,781,124.00 14,036,871.00 - -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 13,781,124.00 14,036,871.00 - - -
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2019-20 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
Fiscal Year 2020-21 RDA Budget Amendment #1
Section G: Board Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
Section I: Board Added Items
Section A: New Items
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Section F: Donations
Board ApprovedAdministration Proposed
1
Initiative Number/Name Project Area Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Fiscal Year 2020-21 RDA Budget Amendment #1
Board ApprovedAdministration Proposed
FY 2019-20
Adopted Budget RDA BA #1 Total Total To-Date
Redevelopment Agency 54,232,618 14,036,871 68,269,489
Redevelopment Agency CIP - -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 54,232,618 14,036,871 68,269,489
Adopted __/__/____
Certification
Budget Manager
Deputy Director, City Council/RDA Board
Contingent Appropriation
2
Item D2
MOTION SHEET
Redevelopment Agency Board of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:RDA Board Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno and Ben Luedtke and Allison Rowland
Deputy Director and Budget & Policy Analysts
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET – Redevelopment Agency (RDA) FY 2022 Budget
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY BOARD MEMBERS –
MOTION 1 – TO ADOPT THE FY22 RDA BUDGET
I move that the Board adopt a resolution approving the FY22 RDA Budget reflected in the attached Key
Changes spreadsheet with the clarifications shown on the motion sheet.
RDA Capital Projects – $2,947,019 in capital projects are approved which do not lapse to Fund Balance with the
understanding that these will return to the Board when specific project / program proposals are available as follows:
a. $83,832 from the Central Business District and $667,535 from Program Income Fund for Storefront & Commercial
Revitalization into a holding account
b. $100,000 from Block 70 for Regent Street Parking Structure Reserve holding account
c. $332,179 from the Depot District for Station Center Infrastructure holding account
d. $200,000 from the Depot District for Environmental Remediation at Station Center Sites 3 & 4
e. $443,731 from the Granary District for Community & Cultural Initiative into a holding account
f. $30,474 from North Temple for the required 10% school fund
g. $289,268 from North Temple for a Strategic Interventions holding account
h. $350,000 Northwest Quadrant Shared Costs holding account
i. $200,000 from Program Income Fund for Sustainability Technical Assistance Program holding account
j. $250,000 from Program Income Fund for Gallivan repairs into a holding account
Overall Budget Process Note: Unless the RDA Board expressly appropriates funds, they’re ineligible to be spent.
MOTION 2 – TO ADOPT LEGISLATIVE INTENTS
I move that the Board adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under
Motion 2, items A and B.
A.Energy Efficiency as a Condition of any RDA Project Loans and Investments. It is the intent of the Board
that all RDA project loans and investments require certain energy efficiency standards be met as a condition of
funding.
Staff note: The Council/Board may wish to designate specific energy efficiency or sustainability standards, such as
those set out by LEED and other accrediting organizations. (See examples at
https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/green-building-standards.)
B.Structure of Accounts within RDA, including Fund Balances and Previous Capital Projects. It is the
intent of the Board to review the full structure of RDA accounts, including fund balances and capital projects funded in
previous years. The Board may wish to discuss with the RDA and Finance staff the best way to get this information on
a real-time basis.
Staff note: The City’s Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) effort will help in tracking/providing this information in
a less labor-intensive way, although the horizon for full implementation could be a year or longer.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
RESOLUTION NO__________
(Adopting the Annual Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah
for Fiscal Year 2021-2022)
A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City,
Utah Adopting the Annual Budget for the Remainder of the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2021
and Ending June 30, 2022.
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“Agency”) was created to
transact the business and exercise the powers provided for in the Utah Community Reinvestment
Agency Act; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has determined it is both necessary and desirable to adopt the
2021-2022 Annual Budget; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Agency (“Board”) has determined that the
public improvements to be carried out with tax increment in each of the project areas will be of
benefit to the project area which generated the tax increment; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2021 the Board of Directors adopted the tentative budget by
Resolution ________ of 2021 (“Tentative Budget”); and
WHEREAS, the Tentative Budget adopted by the Board and all supporting schedules and
data was a public record in the office of the Salt Lake City Recorder, available for public
inspection for a period of at least ten days before the adoption of the final budget; and
WHEREAS, the Agency caused a copy of the proposed 2021-2022 Annual Budget to be
available for public inspection at least seven days before the hearing a) in at least one issue of a
newspaper of general circulation published in Salt Lake County, Utah, b) on the Utah Public
2
Notice Website created in Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and c) on the City’s publicly viewable
Website; and
WHEREAS, at its , 2021, and , 2021 meetings, the Board held
public hearing on the Tentatively Budget, at which hearing all interested persons in attendance or
connected remotely were given an opportunity to be heard on the estimates of revenues and
expenditures or any item in the Tentative Budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of Salt Lake City, that the previously adopted Tentative Budget, as modified by the
“Key Changes” attached and made a part of this Resolution, is adopted as the Budget of the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2021 and
ending June 30, 2022.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following budget contingencies are hereby
adopted with the Agency's 2021/2022 Annual Budget:
A. (Contingencies TBD)
B. A copy of said final budget shall be certified and filed in the office of the City Recorder
whose permanent office is located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, UT
84111 but which office is temporarily located at 349 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, UT
84111. Said final budget shall be available to the public for inspection during regular
business hours.
C. A copy of said final budget shall be certified and filed with the Salt Lake County Auditor, the
State Tax Commission, the State Auditor, the State Board of Education, and each taxing
3
entity from which the Agency receives project area funds as required by Utah Code Section
17C-1-601.5(6) within 90 days after its adoption.
D. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its approval and adoption.
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, this
____ day of , 2021.
________________________________
Ana Valdemoros, Chair
Approved as to form: __________________________________
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Allison Parks
April 30, 2021
The Executive Director:
____ does not request reconsideration
____ requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting.
_________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Attest:
_________________________
City Recorder
PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Work Session on Tuesday,February 16,2021 in an
Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination and Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b).
The following Council Members were present:
Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,
James Rogers
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua Weaver,Associate
Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Lisa Shaffer –Chief Administrative Officer,Rachel Otto
–Chief of Staff,Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Amanda Lau –Public Engagement &
Communication Specialist,Ben Luedtke –Senior Public Policy Analyst,Brian Fullmer
–Constituent Liaison,Policy Analyst,Cindy Gust-Jenson –Executive Director,Jennifer Bruno
–Deputy Director,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant,Russell Weeks –Senior Advisor,
DeeDee Robinson –Deputy City Recorder,Chief Mike Brown –Police Chief,Lauren Shafer
–Assistant City Recorder,Orion Goff –City Building Official,Allison Rowland –Council Public
Policy Analyst,Paul Nielson –Senior City Attorney,Amy Thompson –Senior Planner,Eric Daems
–Senior Planner
Full Meeting Audio
Meeting Packet Material
Councilmember Amy Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 2:02 pm
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
1
Work Session Items
1.Informational:Updates from the Administration ~2:00 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive an update from the Administration on major items or projects,
including but not limited to:
•COVID-19,the March 2020 Earthquake,and the September 2020 Windstorm;
•Updates on relieving the condition of people experiencing homelessness;
•Police Department work,projects,and staffing,etc.;and
•Other projects or updates.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Mayor Mendenhall provided updates regarding:36%of City employees having used
City/Federally provided leave up to this point,City’s Human Resources webpage to begin
providing vaccine updates (including where and when –as they became available),updates
on Raise UP SLC (“Salt Laker Card”)–available to those who did not qualify for stimulus
payments,in the form of a debit card in the amount of $500,homelessness updates included:
City teams worked with Salt Lake County Health Department for an environmental clean up
on 700 South/Rio Grande area,service provider outreach teams continuing to connect
individuals in the area with services/shelter,shelter availability dashboard being updated
daily,new/growing camps in the areas of 800/900 South,300/400 West,and a few locations
along North Temple –City/County working collaboratively for outreach/resolution plans for
these sites,housing updates included:a resolution before the Council this evening –
allocating over $4.5 M towards housing stability,shelter,and homeless services,City having
invested just over $64 M in affordable housing between 2016-2020 (2,539 units of housing
–including new/rehabbed projects),and information regarding the disbursement of new
funding for housing stability assistance through the US Treasury Emergency Rental
Assistance Program ($6+M).
Mike Brown provided information regarding:Field Training Officer program (FTO)being a
16-week evaluation process and in conjunction with Racial Equity in Policing Commission
(REP)recommendations regarding diversity;20 new FTOs were recently sworn in with
seven being of diverse backgrounds,and recruitment/hiring updates would be forthcoming.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
2
2.Informational:Updates on Racial Equity and Policing ~2:30 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will hold a discussion about recent efforts on various projects City staff are
working on related to racial equity and policing in the City.The conversation may include
issues of community concern about race,equity,and justice in relation to law enforcement
policies,procedures,budget,and ordinances.Discussion may include:
•An update or report on the Commission on Racial Equity in Policing;and
•Other project updates or discussion.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Allison Rowland provided updates,including:subcommittee meetings would be held
tomorrow February 17,2021 (including School Safety,Policies &Practice,and Officer
Training),information regarding Racial Equity in Policing (REP)Commission available at
slcrepcommission.com (for agendas and links to join meetings),and next full commission
meeting was scheduled for Feb 24,2021 at 5:00 p.m.
Benjamin Luedtke provided information regarding:Matrix Auditors presented the Police
Department audit to the REP Commission on February 10,2021 (presentation and video
were available on the audit page of the Council’s website),REP commission’s draft
recommendations (three sets)were provided to the audit firm,City Finance Department
having set up access for the auditors to run reports in the City’s financial system (saving time
for consultants/City Staff),a draft Police Department Financial Profile (created by the
auditors –detailing revenues,expenses,classifications within the department,etc.–being a
foundation to develop a zero-based budget process)was sent to Council Members today and
would be made publicly available once completed/reviewed internally,the draft Organization
Profile of the Police Department would be ready for review later this week,and the auditors
would next be reviewing Internal Affairs,the discipline system,and categorizing line item
costs.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
3
3.Informational:State Legislative Briefing ~2:50 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will be briefed by the Administration about issues affecting the City that may
arise during the 2021 Utah State Legislative Session.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 12,2021;Tuesday,February 2,2021;Tuesday,February 9,2021;
and Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Kate Bradshaw (Holland &Hart Law Firm,contract lobbyist)provided
information/updates regarding billboard legislation (ongoing negotiations),homelessness
legislation (House Bill 347 was released last week –with new second substitute to be
submitted),Senate Bill (SB)138 (progress being made),HB 98 (Building Code bill
–protecting historic districts),end of session focusing on new revenue estimates (with
announcements forthcoming on Thursday),most items that were cut during special sessions
in the summer would be restored,compromise struck between public education on the
legislature would be upheld (providing bonuses for teachers),and issues regarding modified
exhaust provisions facing an uphill battle due to State’s decision to do away with safety
inspections.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
4
4.Ordinance:Rezone at approximately 706 to 740 West 900 South and 710
to 739 West Genesee Avenue ~3:10 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal that would rezone properties at 706 to 740 West
900 South and 710 to 739 West Genesee Avenue,including portions of two alleys,from M-1
(Light Manufacturing)to R-MU (Residential Mixed Use).The applicant intends to develop the
remaining portion of the site with multi-family residential housing that is not currently
permitted under the existing zoning designation.The developer has not proposed a specific
development plan as part of the rezone application.The applicant also intends to renovate two
vacant commercial buildings on the site for commercial uses.Consideration may be given to
rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.Other sections of
Title 21A –Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 16,2021
Minutes:
Brian Fullmer provided an introduction and background of the proposal.
Amy Thompson provided information regarding:both petitions receiving favorable
recommendations from Planning Commission,location/zoning of site and surrounding
amenities/properties,comparison of existing/proposed zoning regulations (setbacks,height,
open space),condition to impose design guidelines applicable to D-2 zoning district (as per
Planning’s recommendation to Planning Commission –supported by Master Plan policies &
community feedback),letters of support received from Poplar Grove &Glendale Community
Councils,and concerns received from property owner located on the north east corner
regarding setbacks,height,and possible light being blocked by proposed structures.
Maximilian Coreth and Justin Heppler (applicants)thanked Planning Staff,Salt Lake
Redevelopment Agency (RDA),and others involved with the project,provided history of the
site,noted community outreach was conducted for preferences of development,project
included ideas for restaurants,coffee shops,other businesses in existing buildings (west side)
on the site with planned housing on vacant portion to support said businesses,and discussed
preference for requesting R-MU zoning designation vs.other possible zoning designations.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
5
5.Ordinance:2020 Salt Lake City Street Lighting Master Plan ~3:30 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will be briefed about the 2020 Salt Lake City Street Lighting Master Plan.Some
major changes in the proposed plan include adjustments to how the City chooses lighting in
public spaces based on pedestrian activity and transportation needs,as well as identifies new
street lighting standards for retrofit and new construction.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -TBD
Hold hearing to accept public comment -TBD
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Minutes:
Item pulled.
6.Tentative Break ~4:00 p.m.
20 min.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
6
7.Ordinance:Zoning Text Amendments for Off-street Parking ~4:20 p.m.
45 min.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal that would amend various sections of the Salt
Lake City Code pertaining to off-street parking regulations.The proposal would:
•Update parking requirements to better reflect demand;
•Simplify parking regulations;
•Address technical issues in enforcement;and
•Establish a responsive ordinance to the City’s changing development patterns.
Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 6,2021
Minutes:
Russell Weeks provided a introduction to the proposed amendments,advised of policy
questions,and noted there was a presentation from Planning Staff.
Eric Daems and Nick Norris provided information regarding background (tasked with
updating off-street parking regulations,including maximum/minimum
parking requirements,permitted alternatives,parking lot design/dimension standards),
purpose (align parking chapter with Master Plan goals of the City,modernize for best
practices,standards that reflected market demand,etc.),key chapter updates (relaxed
requirements for expansion or change of use,creation of parking “contexts”(transit,urban
center,neighborhood center,and general)and their locations in the City,revised strategy for
minimum &maximum parking,increased bike parking,updated parking alternatives),
alternatives to parking calculations (dropped transit demand management –TDM –
strategies,up to 40%combined reductions for affordable/senior housing,carpool/car share,
proximity to mass transit,and shared parking,parking study being conducted to reduce or
increase parking),parking maximums/minimums (parking counts based on consultant
recommendations,City and neighborhood goals,and input from property
managers/developers,minimums generally lower,maximums now based on best practice
–rather than percent of minimum,structured parking not counted against parking
maximum,maximum restaurant parking in Neighborhood Center Context increased from 2.5
stalls per 1,000 s/f to 7 per 1,000 s/f.),proposed multi-family parking requirements and
maximums for each context area,recent items to address (text amendment from
eleemosynary facility to congregate care,pending changes to special exception chapters
for front yard parking &vehicle storage w/o hard surfacing,and recommendations recently
received from Transportation’s parking study for Central 9th and 9th &9th areas).
Further discussion was held regarding reasoning for the 9th Central/9th &9th parking study,
how the current proposal dovetailed with on-street parking study,recommendations from
Fehr &Peers study (determining adequate off-street parking in some areas of the City),
determining appropriate maximum requirements for multi-family parking,providing
adequate affordable housing reductions,and the possibility of allowed parking reductions
being applied/packaged/stacked to avoid no parking requirements.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
7
8.Ordinance:Building Inspections for Modular or Factory-Built
Structures ~5:05 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code to
allow off-site inspection of “modular”or “factory-built”structures.These types of homes may
be used either as accessory dwelling units (ADUs)on existing residential properties or as
stand-alone units on a larger site.Modular homes are built in factories and then delivered to
the site for “installation,”which can result in lower costs per unit compared to traditional,on-
site construction.The proposed ordinance would provide a process for permitting,inspecting,
and approving these buildings.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Minutes:
Allison Rowland provided an introduction to the proposed ordinance,a corrected
transmittal was provided to the Council an hour ago,and noted the Council would have the
option to adopt/not adopt the ordinance during the Formal meeting this evening,
Orion Goff provided information regarding:increased interest/requests for modular
homes,clarity provided that modular units/factory built structures were not mobile homes
(regulated by the Federal government –built to HUD standards),State allowing for local
jurisdictions to adopt certain standards/polices/procedures to regulate modular homes,
current regulations do not allow City inspectors to inspect modular homes,ICC
(International Code Council)&Modular Building Institute (MBI)having expressed support
of the update to the ordinance (submitting letters of support)and both working to integrate
the proposed requirements into the next code cycle (being every three years),looking for
immediate adoption and be effective as soon as possible,permitting/inspection requirements
(onsite inspections for footings/setbacks/connections to foundations).
Paul Nielson (City Attorney)indicated this was not a land use regulation/issue and did
not require the Planning Commission process.
Jon Hannah-Spacagna (MBI)noted that modular constructed buildings were built to the
same standards/code as a site built structures (built in a factory)providing more efficiency,
less waste,greener,completed 30-50%faster.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
8
9.Informational:Ranked Choice Voting Overview and Pilot Project ~5:25 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will be briefed about an option to participate in the State-authorized Municipal
Alternative Voting Method Pilot Program project,otherwise known as single-winner ranked-
choice voting or instant runoff voting.Discussion will include how the ranked-choice voting
process works,how the elections would be conducted,relevant bills in the Legislature’s 2021
General Session and public education efforts.
Under ranked choice voting,voters rank the candidates in order of preference.Election
equipment tabulates the preference numbers for each ballot.If none of the candidates receive
more than 50%of the overall vote after the first round of tabulation,the candidate with the
least number of votes is eliminated.The voters who had selected the eliminated candidate as
their first choice would then have their votes tabulated for their second-choice candidate.
This process of elimination continues until a candidate crosses the 50%threshold and is
declared the winner.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Minutes:
Benjamin Luedtke provided an interim update,noting factors might change in the near
future,April 14,2021 was the deadline for the City to provide notice of participation in the
Ranked Choice Voting (RCV)pilot program,a primary election would be optional under the
pilot program,three bills in legislature related to RCV (House Bills (HB)75,127,174),and
previous uncertainty in the County’s ability to provide RCV (cost estimates for an election,
timeline to receive/test equipment,and testing size of ballots).
Cindy Lou Trishman and Lauren Shafer provided information regarding:requirement
to notify the Lieutenant Governor’s Office before April 15,2021 of the City’s interest in
participating in the RCV pilot program,should HB 75 pass,the legislative body (City Council)
would be required to notify the Lieutenant Governor’s Office (rather than the City Recorder’s
Office),should HB 174 pass,the City Council would be required to notify the Lieutenant
Governor’s Office of which voting method was preferred (Star,Approval,or Ranking
method),should HB 75 pass,Salt Lake County would be required (by statute)to run the
election –with no option to contract with another County or for the City to run its own
election.
Councilmember Dugan inquired what other cities used the Star method for RCV.Ms.Shafer
said most cities were utilizing the ranking method,and the Star method would be a new
option if HB 174 passed.
Pamela Spencer,Vineyard City Recorder,provided information regarding Vineyard
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
9
City’s experience moving to RCV and said their Council and residents were pleased with the
outcome and did not report any problems,RCV demonstrations/education was provided to
the public,and was an overall good experience for the City.
Sherrie Swenson,Salt Lake County Clerk provided information regarding
not originally having equipment to accommodate RCV,recently signing a contract on
December 31,2020 for new RCV equipment due to be received in separate shipments over
the next several weeks,importance of testing equipment to efficiently support RCV,Utah
having unlimited amount of candidates to be ranked and how they would fit on a ballot,and
costs involved for having a two page ballot (additional $194,000 –including requiring
additional staff for adjudicated ballots),also noting the County having first offered vote-by-
mail contracts (receiving/tabulating ballots)for cities in 1995,a 90.11%turnout of (record
number)registered voters for November 2020 election (over 100,000 more registered voters
in the County since 2016),
10.Board Appointment:Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board –Shelley
Bodily ~5:55 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview Shelley Bodily prior to considering appointment to the Housing
Trust Fund Advisory Board for a term ending December 30,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Minutes:
Interview was held.Councilmember Fowler said Shelly Bodily’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
11.Board Appointment:Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board
–José Organista ~6:00 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will interview José Organista prior to considering appointment to the Housing
Trust Fund Advisory Board for a term ending December 30,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Minutes:
Interview was held.Councilmember Fowler said Jose Organista’s name was on the Consent
Agenda for formal consideration.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
10
Standing Items
12.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
Minutes:
Item not held.
13.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director
Report of the Executive Director,including a review of Council information items and
announcements.The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City
Council business,including but not limited to scheduling items.
Minutes:
Item not held.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
11
14.Tentative Closed Session
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session.A closed meeting
described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including,but
not limited to:
a.discussion of the character,professional competence,or physical or
mental health of an individual;
b.strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase,exchange,or lease of real
property,including any form of a water right or water shares,if public
discussion of the transaction would:
(i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration;or
(ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the
best possible terms;
e.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property,including any form of
a water right or water shares,if:
(i)public discussion of the transaction would:
(A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration;or
(B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the
best possible terms;
(ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property
would be offered for sale;and
(iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel,devices,or
systems;and
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
12
g.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged
pursuant to Utah Code §78B-1-137,and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the
pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
Minutes:
Item not held.
Meeting adjourned at 5:44 p.m.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed;
please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council
Work Session meeting held 16 February 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
13
PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,February 2,2021 in
an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination and Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b).
The following Council Members were present:
Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,
James Rogers
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua
Weaver,Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Kory Solorio –Assistant
City Recorder,Cindy Gust-Jenson –Executive Director,Libby Stockstill –Policy Analyst/Public
Engagement,Robert Nutzman –Administrative Assistant
Full Meeting Audio
Meeting Packet Material
Public Comments submitted through the City Council office from January 26 through February
3
Councilmember Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at Tuesday,February 2,2021
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings.
Minutes:
Councilmember Amy Fowler stated the meetings were being conducted electronically due
to Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation 2.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes:
A moment of silence was held while the American Flag and Pledge was displayed on the
screen.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
NONE.
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
NONE.
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
Minutes:
NONE.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
2
2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
Minutes:
Darren Mann,Village Cooperative,said he created a homeless camp at his personal residence,and the
mission of Village Cooperative was to localize food sources.He said elected officials had not responded to his
efforts to reach out.He stated he had experience managing vacant lands and expressed desire to work
collaboratively with the City to solve the homeless crisis.
Councilmember Johnston took a moment of personal privilege to inform Mr.Mann that his voicemail was full
and shared the option of texting or returning the call.
Kseniya Kniazeva,Nomad Alliance,commented about the homeless crisis,requested the City complete
regular trash pickups at the settlements,expressed desire to collaborate/address homeless issues,and
requested Last Hope camp abatement be rescheduled.
Jen Colby commented about the upcoming public hearing for the zoning amendments proposed at Lincoln
Street and 200 South,documentation indicating the structures were contributing historic structures,and
expressed support of affordable housing opportunities.
Cory Larsen,Nomad Alliance,commented the homeless camp abatements occurring without a destination
for the people was disheartening,requested multiple days notice prior to abatement,and suggested more
opportunities to help those who continue being moved from one location to another.
Annie Charles spoke about the abatements scheduled directly before winter-weather storms,referenced the
CDC guidelines,shared triggering moments within shelters/resource centers (due to the lack of feeling safe),
and suggested more compassion and consideration of the scheduling/practice.
Dave Illtis referenced the ordinance regarding free metered parking for green vehicles.He expressed
the effort was supportive of vehicle use,spoke of concern about pollution from tire particles,and suggested a
reduced fee for electric vehicle parking.He commented about the loss of bicycle parking with the installation
of parking meter structures and noted a parking study recently completed (indicated there was too much
parking downtown)was not provided to the public .
Sariah Westfall,Nomad Alliance,expressed concern of current camp abatements without a destination,
commented about Mr.Mann’s resources on his personal property (garbage cans,bathroom use),encouraged
getting to know those without shelter at Mr.Mann’s property,and advocated for the continued allowance of
Mr.Mann’s efforts.
Emily Alworth spoke about the camp abatements and suggested rescheduling upcoming abatements until
after the snowstorm.She said it was safer for the homeless to have their belongings in this weather.
Monica Hilding referenced the proposed ordinance for zoning amendments at Lincoln Street and 200
south,noted the structures were historic (built in the 1890s),and shared historical content was also provided
in the 1980s (while efforts to obtain a local historic district of the neighborhood was being pursued).
She encouraged the Council to consider the public comments and information shared by Planning and the
community.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
3
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1.Motion:Meeting Remotely Without an Anchor Location
The Council will consider a motion to ratify the determination that the Council will
continue to meet remotely and without an anchor location under HB5002.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 7,2020;Tuesday,August 11,2020;
Tuesday,September 1,2020;Tuesday,October 6,2020;Wednesday,October 28,
2020;Tuesday,November 17,2020;Tuesday,December 8,2020;Tuesday,
January 5,2021;and Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to ratify the
determination that the Council continue meeting remotely and without an
anchor location.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
4
2.Resolution:Local Emergency Declaration Extension –COVID-19
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor’s
March 10,2020 proclamation declaring a local emergency relating to COVID-19
(coronavirus).The Council’s most recent extension of the local emergency relating
to COVID-19 terminates February 3,2021.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Mano to adopt
Resolution 3 of 2021,extending a proclamation declaring a local emergency
relating to the COVID-19 (Coronavirus)pandemic,until May 5,2021.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
5
3.Resolution:Local Emergency Declaration Extension –Magnitude 5.7
Earthquake
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor’s
March 18,2020 proclamation declaring a local emergency relating to a magnitude
5.7 earthquake.The Council’s most recent extension of the local emergency
relating to the earthquake terminates February 3,2021.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Discussion on the motion from Councilmember Johnston included Ms.Gust-Jenson
stating the purpose of extending this emergency declaration was to preserve City options
for federal funding;noting the Council may rescind it at any time.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt
Resolution 4 of 2021,extending a proclamation declaring a local emergency
relating to a magnitude 5.7 earthquake,until May 5,2021.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
6
4.Resolution:Local Emergency Declaration Extension –Windstorm
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would extend the Mayor’s
September 8,2020 proclamation declaring a local emergency relating to the
windstorm.The Council’s most recent extension of the local emergency relating to
the windstorm terminates February 3,2021.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Mano,seconded by Councilmember Wharton to adopt
Resolution 5 of 2021,extending a proclamation declaring a local emergency
relating to the Windstorm until May 5,2021
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NONE.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
7
G.CONSENT:
1.Ordinance*:Zoning Amendments at Lincoln Street and 200 South
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map
and Central Community Master Plan for properties located at 159 South Lincoln
Street,949 East,955 East,959 East and 963 East 200 South.The requested rezone
would change the properties from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential)to
RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential)zoning district.The Master
Plan amendment would change the properties from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential.The proposal would allow the applicant more
flexibility to develop future multi-family residential housing than what is currently
allowed.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning
district with similar characteristics.Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also
be amended as part of this petition.Petition No.:PLNPCM2019-00683 and
PLNPCM2019-00684
*The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation,therefore an
ordinance has not been drafted.If the Council decides to approve the zone
amendment,an ordinance would be drafted and considered for approval.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
8
2.Ordinance:Rezone at 1301 and 1321 South State Street
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance to rezone the properties at 1301 and
1321 South State Street.The proposal would change the properties from CC
(Corridor Commercial)to FB-UN2 (Form Base Urban Neighborhood 2)and
amend the table of the zoning ordinance to include additional land area eligible
for additional building height.The applicant requested the rezone because the FB-
UN2 zoning district better aligns with potential use of the corner lot and potential
for a new mixed-use building,which would replace existing buildings on the
parcels.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning
district with similar characteristics.Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also
be amended as part of this petition.Petition No.:PLNPCM2020-00328
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
9
3.Ordinance:Zoning Amendments at Approximately 2903 South
Highland Drive
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Sugar House
Master Plan and Zoning Map for property at 2903 South Highland Drive.The
property is currently “split zoned.”The applicant is requesting the eastern portion
of the property be changed from Low Density Residential to Low Intensity –
Mixed Use in the Sugar House Master Plan.The applicant is also requesting a
zoning change on the eastern portion of the property from the current R-1-7000
(Single-Family Residential)to CB (Community Business)in order to match zoning
on the western portion.If approved,the changes would allow for potential future
development of the site.Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to
another zoning district with similar characteristics.Other sections of Title 21A –
Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition.
Petition No.:PLNPCM2020-00053/00054
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
4.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.4)Associated with BAM No.7
for Fiscal Year 2020-21
The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.4)
for Fiscal Year 2020-21 Associated with Budget Amendment No.7.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
10
5.Board Appointment:Bicycle Advisory Committee –Rachel Manko
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Rachel Manko to the
Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending February 2,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
6.Board Reappointment:Business Advisory Board –Derek Deitsch
The Council will consider the reappointment of Derek Deitsch to the Business
Advisory Board as an ex-officio member with a term ending December 27,2021.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve the
Consent Agenda.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin
Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
Minutes:
Councilmember Fowler expressed appreciation to Council Staff on their successful efforts
managing electronic meetings and making adjustments based on feedback.
Councilmember Fowler also noted the Grant Applications on the Consent Agenda had already
completed a public hearing and said it was necessary to release funding from the holding
account at this time.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
11
H.ADJOURNMENT:
Minutes:
Meeting adjourned at 7:48 p.m.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been
discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code
§52-4-203(2)(b).
This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council
Formal meeting held 02 February 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 2,2021
12
PENDING MINUTES –NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,met in Formal Session on Tuesday,February 16,
2021 in an Electronic Meeting,pursuant to the Chair’s determination and Salt Lake City
Emergency Proclamation No.2 of 2020(2)(b).
The following Council Members were present:
Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,
James Rogers
Present Legislative leadership:
Cindy Gust-Jenson,Executive Director;Jennifer Bruno,Deputy Director;Lehua
Weaver,Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall;Rachel Otto,Chief of Staff;Lisa Shaffer,Chief Administrative Officer
Present City Staff:
Katherine Lewis –City Attorney,Cindy Lou Trishman –City Recorder,Kory Solorio –Assistant
City Recorder,Russell Weeks –Senior Advisor,Sylvia Richards –Public Policy Analyst,Jessica
Waters –Police Department Social Work Director
Full Meeting Audio
Meeting Packet Material
Public Comments submitted through the City Council office from 02/09/2021 thru 02/16/2021
Councilmember Fowler presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
1
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Amy Fowler will conduct the formal meetings.
Minutes:
Councilmember Amy Fowler stated the meetings were held electronically due to the
Emergency Proclamation 2 of Salt Lake City.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes:
A moment of silence was held while the American Flag and Pledge text was displayed on
the screen.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday,June 9,
2020.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to approve
the work session meeting minutes of Tuesday,June 9,2020.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
Mendenhall declaring March 1st as COVID-19 Victims and Survivors Memorial
Day in Salt Lake City.
Minutes:
The resolution was read by Councilmember Dugan.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to to
adopt Joint Ceremonial Resolution 6 of 2021 Designating the First Monday
in March as COVID-19 Victims and Survivors Memorial Day in Salt Lake City.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Items B1-B8 will be heard as one public hearing
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
2
1.Grant Application:Local Government On-System Bridge Rehabilitation
Replacement Funding:1500 West 650 North
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Engineering Division to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)for the
Local Government On-System Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement Funding for the
bridge at 1500 West 650 North.If awarded,the grant would fund:the replacement
of the entire bridge while maintaining the existing bridge length and width;the
widening of the bridge sidewalk for a combination sidewalk and bike path;the
addition of seismic upgrades;and the restoration of the slopes under the bridge to
match the slopes on the sides of the existing bridge.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
2.Grant Application:Fix the Bricks –Building Resilient Infrastructure &
Communities
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Emergency Management Division to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA)for the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC)
program.The program is offering a new benefit ($100,000)for the research and
development of an Equity and Inclusion plan to include low income and
underserved communities in Salt Lake City.If awarded,Emergency Management
would engage a consultant to identify solutions to include in the plan.The funding
would also pay salary and benefits for two existing Full Time Employee (FTE)
positions tasked to assist with the program.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
3
3.Grant Application:Surface Transportation Program Fiscal Year
2022-27 –700 North Corridor Transformation
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Engineering Division to the Wasatch Front Regional Council.If awarded,this
grant would fund the 700 North Corridor improvements between Redwood Road
and 2200 West.Improvements would include new pavement,a new traffic signal
and pedestrian and bicycle crossing,intersection improvements,new sidewalk
where sidewalk is missing,new striping for existing bicycle lanes,and upgrades to
two bus stops.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
4.Grant Application:Congestion Mitigation Air Quality 2022-27:Utah
Inland Port Authority Electrified Truck Facility
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Community and Neighborhoods to the Wasatch Front Regional
Council.If awarded,this grant would be used to fund the construction of the Utah
Inland Port Authority Electrified Truck Parking Facility at 700 North John Glenn
Road.The facility would accommodate over two hundred electrified trucks to park
overnight with plug-in electric charging equipment.The Department of
Community and Neighborhoods (CAN),as an eligible applicant,agreed to be a
pass through agent for the Utah Inland Port Authority.The Utah Inland Port
Authority will be responsible for oversight,management,and implementation of
the project.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
4
5.Grant Application:Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Fiscal
Year 2022-23 –Kensington East/West Neighborhood Byway Phase 2
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Transportation Division to the Wasatch Front Regional Council.If awarded,the
grant would be used for the Kensington East-West Neighborhood Byway Phase 2
project to enhance bicycle and pedestrian use and connectivity on low-volume
local streets as a through route and to improve crossings at larger streets.
Upgrades would also include enhanced crossings with pedestrian signals,median
refuge islands,traffic calming,and wayfinding signs.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
6.Grant Application:Transportation and Land Use Connection Grant
Fiscal Year 2022 –Granary District Area Plan
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Transportation Division to Salt Lake County,the Utah Department of
Transportation (UDOT),the Utah Transit Authority (UTA),and the Wasatch Front
Regional Council.If awarded,the grant would be used for technical assistance to
develop the Granary District Area Plan.The plan would evaluate options to
maximize all modes of travel to increase connectivity and serve the significant
changes in land use and density in the Granary District.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
5
7.Grant Application:Transportation and Land Use Connection Grant
Fiscal Year 2022 -Downtown Building Height Zoning Update
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Planning Division to Salt Lake County,the Utah Department of Transportation
(UDOT),the Utah Transit Authority (UTA),and the Wasatch Front Regional
Council.If awarded,the grant would be used for technical assistance in the
development of the Downtown Building Height Zoning Update.The project would
be an evaluation,recommendation,and update to the building height zoning
regulations to support future growth in the downtown area while reducing the
impacts of taller buildings on public spaces.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
6
8.Grant Application:Bureau of Emergency (BEMS)Services –Fiscal
Year 2022 Per Capita Allocation
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Salt Lake City Fire Department to the State Bureau of Emergency Services and
Preparedness.If awarded,the grant would fund the purchase of medical supplies
for the Fire Department.This is an annual grant award based on per capita of
population served.The award amount would be determined in the coming
months.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -n/a
Staff Recommendation -Close and refer to future consent agenda.
Minutes:
Sylvia Richards provided a brief summary regarding the grant applications process.
Greg Sanchez expressed support for Grants one and three (Grant Application:Local
Government On-System Bridge Rehabilitation Replacement Funding:1500 West 650 North and Grant
Application:Fix the Bricks –Building Resilient Infrastructure &Communities),the
importance of infrastructures for the city in creating more of a community center.
Amy Hawkins,Chair of the Ballpark Community Council,expressed support for Grant
Item No.5 (Grant Application:Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Fiscal Year
2022-23 –Kensington East/West Neighborhood Byway Phase 2),and said crime would
be deterred with a neighborhood byway.
Kenan Wells was called upon and stated he was unsure if he was in the correct area.It
was determined that his comments should be made during the general comments
session.
Taylor Anderson,co-founder of Sweet Streets,applauded the Transportation Division
for creative funding methods,and expressed support for the Kensington Byway Grant
application (Item No.5)that would create safer routes for pedestrians and children who
attended school in the area.
Monica Hilding expressed concerns with Grant Item No.4 (Grant Application:
Congestion Mitigation Air Quality 2022-27:Utah Inland Port Authority Electrified Truck
Facility),regarding lack of transparency and public opposition to the Utah Inland Port
Authority.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
7
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to to close
the public hearings and refer Items 1-8 to a future Consent Agenda for action.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
9.Resolution:Bond Authorizing the Establishment of Short-term
Borrowing Program for the Benefit of the Department of Airports
The Council will accept public comment about a bond resolution authorizing the
establishment of a short-term borrowing program for the benefit of the
Department of Airports through the issuance and/or incurrence of the
aforementioned Revolving Obligations,from time to time,which may be
outstanding at any one time in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$300,000,000.Approving the revolving line of credit to be provided by JPMorgan
Chase,National Association,and giving authority to certain officers to approve the
final terms and provisions of and confirm the issuance and/or incurrence of the
Revolving Obligations,from time to time,within certain parameters set forth in
the attached Bond Resolution.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 19,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,January 19,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,February 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 19,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Russell Weeks provided a brief summary regarding the resolution.
There were no public comments.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to close the
public hearing
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
8
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
NONE.
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
Minutes:
Mayor Mendenhall commented about the storm expected that evening and ensured
preparations had been made for it.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
9
2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited
to two minutes.)
Minutes:
Councilmember Fowler outlined the public meeting rules and decorum.
Tyler Slack said he worked in Salt Lake City for 20 years and spoke about the
unsheltered population being moved from place to place.He urged the Council to find
better solutions to prevent further trauma and help save lives.
Jen Colby said she opposed amending the master plan and zoning map on 900 East/200
South/Lincoln Street.She said rezoning was harmful to long-term affordability and was
not necessary for new development in the area.
Rich Wilcox said he opposed amending the master plan and zoning map on 900
East/200 South/Lincoln Street.He said the two-year process had been stressful for
residents and nothing had changed since the Planning Commission’s negative
recommendation last year.
Cindy Cromer expressed disagreement with the rezoning map on 900 East/200
South/Lincoln Street.and said more harm would come to the community such as
inadvertently increasing the cost of housing.
Keenan Wells expressed disagreement with the rezoning map on 900 East/200
South/Lincoln Street and commented on the disregard of owners to their tenants by
attempting to evict/evicting tenants during the pandemic.
Kseniya Kniazeva,Executive Director of Nomad Alliance,thanked Council Members
Fowler and Wharton for their interest and involvement with the Nomad supply drive and
requested further cooperation to find permanent solutions to prevent suffering.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
10
George Chapman commented on the parking proposal (agenda item G-3)public
hearing date and asked the Council to give the public more time before holding the
hearing.
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1.Ordinance:Building Inspections for Modular or Factory-Built
Structures
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending Sections 18.08.040
and 18.32.020 of the Salt Lake City Code to allow off-site inspection of “modular”
or “factory-built”structures.These types of homes may be used either as accessory
dwelling units (ADUs)on existing residential properties or as stand-alone units on
a larger site.Modular homes are built in factories and then delivered to the site for
“installation,”which can result in lower costs per unit compared to traditional,on-
site construction.The proposed ordinance would provide a process for permitting,
inspecting,and approving these buildings.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Valdemoros to adopt
Ordinance 2 of 2021,adopting changes related to modular building
construction and inspections.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
11
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
12
1.Resolution:Awarding U.S.Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD)Coronavirus Aid,Relief,and Economic Security
(CARES)Act Grant Funds
The Council will consider adopting a resolution about funding recommendations
from resident advisory boards and the Mayor and approving an interlocal
agreement between the City and the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD).This agreement allocates and awards funding to those
applicants.Community partners submitted applications for one-time pandemic
response funding from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV),
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG-CV)and Housing Opportunities for Persons with
AIDS (HOPWA)grants.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 19,2021 and Tuesday,February 2,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Councilmember Fowler took a moment of personal privilege to thank those involved
–specifically those in Community &Neighborhoods and Housing and Neighborhood
Division for their swift work to prepare the necessary materials to distribute the funds to
the community.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to approve an
appropriations resolution (Resolution 8 of 2021)updating the 2020-2021
action plan as set forth in Exhibit A for Volunteers of America application
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
13
ESG #4.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin Mano,James
Rogers
RECUSED:Andrew Johnston
Final Result:6 –0 Pass
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to to authorize
an interlocal agreement between the City and HUD and approve an
appropriations resolution (Resolution 8 of 2021)updating the 2020-2021
action plan as set forth in Exhibit A awarding CDBG,ESG,and HOPWA funds
except for ESG #4.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
2.Joint City Council-Mayor Resolution:Applauding the Work of the Salt
Lake City Hostage Negotiation Team and Director Jessica Waters
The Council will consider adopting a joint resolution with Mayor Erin
Mendenhall applauding the work of the Salt Lake City Police Department Hostage
Negotiation Team and Director Jessica Waters.For their dedicated work,
committed compassion,and successful de-escalation during a highly stressful
situation,ensuring the safety and well-being of Salt Lake City’s residents.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 2,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
Minutes:
Councilmember Fowler commented on the resolution and pervious work/discussions.
Jessica Walters thanked those involved in the process and mentioned the team effort it
required.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
14
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Rogers,seconded by Councilmember Dugan to adopt joint
Resolution 7 of 2021 applauding the work of the Salt Lake City Hostage
Negotiation Team and Director Jessica Waters.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,
Darin Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
G.CONSENT:
1.Ordinance:Rezone at approximately 706 to 740 West 900 South and
710 to 739 West Genesee Avenue
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would rezone properties at 706
to 740 West 900 South and 710 to 739 West Genesee Avenue,including portions of
two alleys,from M-1 (Light Manufacturing)to R-MU (Residential Mixed Use).The
applicant intends to develop the remaining portion of the site with multi-family
residential housing that is not currently permitted under the existing zoning
designation.The developer has not proposed a specific development plan as part of
the rezone application.The applicant also intends to renovate two vacant
commercial buildings on the site for commercial uses.Consideration may be given
to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.
Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition.
Petition Nos.:PLNPCM2019-01137 and PLN2020-00442
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 2,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,March 16,2021
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
15
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
2.Ordinance:Library Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2020-21
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 16,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance to amend the budget for the Library
Fund for Fiscal Year 2020-21.Budget amendments happen several times each year
to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project additions
and modifications.The proposed amendment includes funding to complete the
Library’s Master Facilities Plan,a grant to increase digital access to underserved
populations in the City,for earthquake repairs to the Main Library Branch,and
Sprague Branch renovations,among other changes.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 9,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 6,2021
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
3.Ordinance:Zoning Text Amendments for Off-street Parking
The Council will set the date of Tuesday,March 16,2021 at 7 p.m.to accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections
of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to off-street parking regulations.The
proposal would:
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
16
•Update parking requirements to better reflect demand;
•Simplify parking regulations;
•Address technical issues in enforcement;and
•Establish a responsive ordinance to the City’s changing development patterns.
Other sections of Title 21A –Zoning may also be amended as part of this
petition.Petition No.:PLNPCM2017-00753
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,March 16,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,April 6,2021
Staff Recommendation -Set date.
4.Board Appointment:Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board –Shelley
Bodily
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Shelley Bodily to the
Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board for a term ending December 30,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
5.Board Appointment:Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board –José
Organista
The Council will consider approving the appointment of José Organista to the
Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board for a term ending December 30,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
17
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
6.Board Reappointment:Transportation Advisory Board –Dave
Alderman
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Dave Alderman to the
Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending February 20,2024.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,February 16,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
Motion:
Moved by Councilmember Wharton,seconded by Councilmember Mano to to approve the
Consent Agenda.
AYE:Amy Fowler,Ana Valdemoros,Andrew Johnston,Chris Wharton,Daniel Dugan,Darin
Mano,James Rogers
Final Result:7 –0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
18
H.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at 8:03 p.m.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair
_______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been
discussed;please refer to the audio or video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code
§52-4-203(2)(b).
This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council
Formal meeting held 16 February 2021.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday,February 16,2021
19
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING JUNE 19TH AS
JUNETEENTH DAY IN SALT LAKE CITY
WHEREAS, President Abraham Lincoln first issued the Emancipation Proclamation
effective January 1, 1863, decreeing all people held as slaves be “henceforward”
free, however, some southern enslavers ignored that order; and
WHEREAS, Union General Gordon Granger was dispatched to Galveston, Texas to
announce the surrender of Confederate General Robert E. Lee and on June 19,
1865 enforced the president’s 1863 order freeing the people still held in human
bondage in the State of Texas, two and a half years after it was first decreed;
and
WHEREAS, June 19th has since come to be known as Juneteenth and is one of the oldest
celebrations in America growing out of the experiences of Black Americans and
their enslaved ancestors and is a celebration of the ending of chattel slavery in
America with the first “official” Juneteenth celebration taking place in Texas in
1866; and
WHEREAS, Juneteenth provides an opportunity for the City to celebrate Black American
heritage and honor the lives, sacrifices and contributions that are woven into
the American fabric; and
WHEREAS, Juneteenth also acknowledges America’s commitment to liberty and equality in
accordance with the Constitution of the United States, along with the
Emancipation Proclamation, and the 13th Amendment to the Constitution which
abolished slavery, ratified by Congress on December 6, 1865; and
WHEREAS, through other systems of oppression, such as sharecropping, Jim Crow,
redlining, and mass incarceration, the plunder of Black bodies and Black wealth
continued past slavery and persists to this day, disproportionately affecting the
physical and mental health, safety, and education of Black Americans; and
WHEREAS, the candid acknowledgment of this history is necessary if we, as a nation, state,
or city, are successful in our effort to build a truly equitable community that
exemplifies and promotes the fundamental American values of freedom,
diversity, equality, liberty, and justice; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah recognizes Juneteenth Freedom Day, on the third Saturday in
June.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,
that Salt Lake City Council and Mayor recognize June 19, 2021 as Juneteenth
Freedom Day in Salt Lake City in celebration of the culturally important role of
emancipation and the work toward that liberation in our past, present, and
future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
that Salt Lake City emphasizes the freedom and dignity of every human being
and opposes and rejects any form of oppression.
Adopted this _____ day of June 2021
__________________________ ______________________
Erin Mendenhall Amy Fowler, Chair
Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Council Member, District Seven
__________________________ ________________________
James Rogers, Vice Chair Dennis Faris
Salt Lake City Council Member, District One Salt Lake City Council Member, District Two
______________________________ ____________________________
Chris Wharton Ana Valdemoros
Salt Lake City Council Member, District Three Salt Lake City Council Member, District Four
__________________________ __________________________
Darin Mano Daniel Dugan
Salt Lake City Council Member, District Five Salt Lake City Council Member, District Six
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
1. 9-Line Railroad Crossing: Transportation Investment Fund-Active
Transportation (TIF-Active) Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the
construction of a bridge or tunnel for the 9-Line Trail at approximately 650 West for the
safety of pedestrians and cyclists over or under the railroad. The Administration indicates
that cost estimates for this project are based on similar structures and may increase
considerably when a more detailed site analysis is conducted. Additionally, the height of the
rail cars and the low deck of the I-15 highway bridge are two significant constraints of this
complex site. This project is ranked as priority three out of eight projects nominated by the
City in 2021.
Grant Amount: $4,200,000
Requested by: Department of Community & Neighborhoods, Division of Transportation
Funding Agency: Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
Page | 2
Match Requirement: $2,800,000 cash match – Source: Salt Lake City’s Quarter Cent
Sales Tax funding and/or Impact Fees
NOTE: This is a nomination process, rather than a typical application process, which UDOT uses to
bookmark funding for highway capacity, active transportation, and transit projects. The timeline for
the nominated projects (2023 – 2027) is beyond the horizon for which the City typically allocates
funding. Therefore, the match source is based on funding that is likely to be available based on
ongoing funding sources dedicated to transportation.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Additional Information - The following information was provided by the Administration in
response to Council staff’s questions:
1. Who or what will determine whether the project is a bridge or tunnel?
This project has been nominated for UDOT funding to place it on the “future
project” radar of the many agencies that will need to collaborate to make a grade-
separated crossing at this critical connection for walking and bicycling between the city’s
east and west sides. An extensive technical analysis, planning, negotiation, and
engagement process will need to occur before any decisions are made about design. This
process will begin with a larger discussion of east-west connections as a key element of
the Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan. The larger east-west connections
discussions are anticipated to begin in the next few months. It is yet to be determined if
this crossing will also include transit and/or private motor vehicles. Considerable
additional funding from federal, state, county, and city sources may be
needed to construct a suitable crossing, particularly if additional modes are
added. Similar to a large highway project or to the 200 South-North Temple Jordan
River Trail Bridge, this project is likely to take 10+ years to work out the complex
technical, legal, and funding partnerships needed tor implementation. This nomination
seeks, in part, to begin the discussions for this critical crossing. The Mayor’s FY22
budget recommends $200,000 in CIP funds to improve the safety of this
crossing with near-term at-grade solutions until an appropriate grade-separated
solution is implemented.
2. Could the City’s match instead be provided by the 900 South corridor 10-project
consolidation funding that’s been secured?
This project is unlikely to occur sooner than in the next ten years. It may not even turn
out to be feasible, at which point the City would request for UDOT to remove the project
from the nomination list. The anticipated decade-long timeline for the 9-Line Railroad
Crossing likely eliminates the 900 South corridor ten-project consolidation funding as a
viable match source.
3. What percentage of this project is impact fee eligible? And would the Impact Fee Plan need
to be amended to make this project eligible?
Page | 3
It is likely that the Impact Fee Plan would need to be amended to include this
project. The percentage of the project eligible for impact fees could be more
accurately estimated post-Impact Fee Plan amendment.
4. Have any discussions happened with the railroad companies, UDOT and/or the Federal
Government about this bridge or tunnel?
This crossing has been discussed with UDOT in the context of the Regional
Transportation Plan developed by the Wasatch Front Regional Council. To date, the
project has not been discussed with the federal government. It is anticipated that
extensive discussions will need to happen with all of these partners prior to any future
construction.
Grant Nomination Submission Notification Memo
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Cindy Lou Trishman,
Brijette Williams
CC: Sarah Behrens, Janyce Fowles, Jon Larsen, Jaysen Oldroyd, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee
Robinson, Linda Sanchez, Jordan Smith, Kory Solorio, Blake Thomas, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: April 2, 2021
SUBJECT: Transportation Investment Fund-Active Transportation: 9-Line Railroad Crossing
FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
GRANT PROGRAM: Transportation Investment Fund – Active Transportation (TIF-ACTIVE)
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $4,200,000
DEPARTMENT: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Division of Transportation
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: None
DATE SUBMITTED: March 29, 2021
SPECIFICS:
□ Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides FTE
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required $2,800,000 □ In-Kind and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
The Division of Transportation requested $4,200,000 for the 9-Line Railroad Crossing.
The project will construct a bridge or tunnel for the 9-Line Trail at approximately 650 West to provide safe
passage for pedestrians and cyclists over or under the freight and passenger rail.
The requested funding is based on a planning level cost estimated from similar structures and may
considerably change as a more detailed site analysis is completed.
This is a complex site with significant constraints due to the height of rail cars and the low deck of the I-15
highway bridge.
The $2,800,000 match will be met through the City's quarter cent sales tax funding and/or impact fees.
The 9-Line Railroad Crossing is ranked as priority three out of the eight projects nominated by the City in 2021.
NOTE:
This is a nomination process, rather than a typical application process, that UDOT uses to bookmark funding for
highway capacity, active transportation, and transit projects.
The timeline for the nominated projects (2023 – 2027) is beyond the horizon for which the City typically
allocates funding. Therefore, the match source is based on funding that is likely to be available based on
ongoing funding sources dedicated to transportation.
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
2. Red Butte Creek Trail Investment Fund-Active Transportation (TIF-Active)
Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the
construction of a one mile paved trail along the Red Butte Creek corridor. The trail will
cross near the creek by way of a new underpass under Foothill Drive, and connect to the
University of Utah family student housing and the Veterans Affairs campus. The project
area boundaries include the University of Utah and Fort Douglas to the north, and Research
Park Business Park to the south. A large portion of the project costs relate to the grades
along Red Butte Creek and the Foothill Drive underpass. This project is ranked as priority
seven out of eight projects nominated by the City in 2021.
Grant Amount: $2,520,000
Requested by: Department of Community & Neighborhoods, Division of Transportation
Funding Agency: Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
Page | 2
Match Requirement: $1,680,000 cash match – Source: Salt Lake City’s Quarter Cent
Sales Tax funding that is focused on trails
NOTE: This is a nomination process, rather than a typical application process, which UDOT uses to
bookmark funding for highway capacity, active transportation, and transit projects. The timeline for
the nominated projects (2023 – 2027) is beyond the horizon for which the City typically allocates
funding. Therefore, the match source is based on funding that is likely to be available based on
ongoing funding sources dedicated to transportation.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Additional information – The Administration provided the following information based on
responses to Council Staff’s questions:
a. Who owns the properties upon which the trail would be built?
Key properties along the creek are owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints, Salt Lake City (Sunnyside Park), University of Utah, U.S. Army Reserve/Fort
Douglas, and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The Foothill Drive corridor right
of way is owned by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). A precise
alignment of the trail has not yet been determined.
b. How, if at all, would the University of Utah be involved in this project?
The University of Utah would be involved as an active partner in the design,
landowner discussions, civic engagement, and potentially the funding for this
project.
c. Is this project located within the proposed Research Park RDA project area?
The proposed Research Park RDA area includes the trail north of Foothill
Drive. Some or nearly all of the Red Butte Creek Trail project area south of Foothill
Drive would be in the proposed Research Park RDA area depending on exactly where
the RDA area boundary is finalized and on which side of the creek the trail is
constructed along.
Grant Nomination Submission Notification Memo
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Cindy Lou Trishman,
Brijette Williams
CC: Sarah Behrens, Janyce Fowles, Jon Larsen, Jaysen Oldroyd, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee
Robinson, Linda Sanchez, Jordan Smith, Kory Solorio, Blake Thomas, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Elizabeth Gerhart eg
DATE: April 2, 2021
SUBJECT: Transportation Investment Fund-Active Transportation: Red Butte Creek Trail
FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT)
GRANT PROGRAM: Transportation Investment Fund – Active Transportation (TIF-ACTIVE)
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $2,520,000
DEPARTMENT: Department of Community & Neighborhoods | Division of Transportation
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: None
DATE SUBMITTED: March 29, 2021
SPECIFICS:
□ Equipment/Supplies Only
□ Technical Assistance
□ Provides FTE
□ Existing □ New □ Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required $1,680,000 □ In-Kind and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
The Division of Transportation requested $2,520,000 for the Red Butte Creek Trail.
The project will construct a paved multi-use trail that follows the Red Butte Creek corridor.
The project area is bounded by the University of Utah and Fort Douglas to the north and by the Research
Park business park to the south.
The one mile stretch of trail will cross next to or near the creek via a new underpass under Foothill Drive and
connect to the University of Utah family student housing and the Veterans Affairs campus.
A significant portion of the cost relates to the grades along Red Butte Creek and Foothill Drive underpass.
The $1,680,000 match will be met through the City's quarter cent sales tax funding that is focused on trails.
The Red Butte Creek Trail is ranked as priority seven out of the eight projects nominated by the City in 2021.
NOTE:
This is a nomination process, rather than a typical application process, that UDOT uses to bookmark funding for
highway capacity, active transportation, and transit projects.
The timeline for the nominated projects (2023 – 2027) is beyond the horizon for which the City typically
allocates funding. Therefore, the match source is based on funding that is likely to be available based on
ongoing funding sources dedicated to transportation.
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE: June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
3.2022 Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant Program
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the Administration indicates the grant monies
will be used to augment the Police Department’s mental health and law enforcement co-
responder initiative as follows:
a) Immigrant and minority outreach and education: The Department will enhance staff
resources to engage with and educate the community. This effort will focus on districts
with higher immigrant and minority populations and will seek to provide information
about the initiative, educate citizens on how individuals can access crisis services, and
ultimately build trust with individuals in these target populations. Cost estimate:
Outreach and Education Overtime/Printing Materials cost estimate: $5,000
b) Expanded coverage and equipment: The Department will expand co-responder team
coverage to nights/weekends and provide ballistic vests to mental health professionals.
Coverage Overtime estimate: $73,000 -- Vests – $7,000
Page | 2
c) Training: The Department will focus on three components of training: a) Professional
training for current co-responder team members; b) Site visits with other agencies
implementing co-responder initiatives, c) Internal training to patrol officers and
detectives on the initiative and how to best utilize department resources. The
Administration indicates that nine civilian staff in the Social Work Program, and four
sworn staff in the Crisis Intervention Team will receive the training. In addition,
training will be provided to as many patrol officers and detectives as possible.
Training cost estimate: $15,000
Grant Amount: $100,000
Requested by: Police Department
Funding Agency: Target Stores and the United States Conference of Mayors
Match Requirement: - 0 –
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Cindy Lou
Trishman, Brijette Williams
CC: Sarah Behrens, Mike Brown, Shellie Dietrich, Tim Doubt, Elizabeth Gerhart, Mark Kittrell, Jaysen
Oldroyd, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Linda Sanchez, Kory Solorio, Lehua
Weaver
FROM: Jordan Smith
DATE: April 20, 2021
SUBJECT: 2021 Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant Program
FUNDING AGENCY: Target / The United States Conference of Mayors
GRANT PROGRAM: Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant Program
REQUESTED AMOUNT: $100,000
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Police Department
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A
DATE SUBMITTED: April 13, 2021
SPECIFICS:
Equipment/Supplies
Technical Assistance (Training)
Provides FTE Position
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation: Please see below
Match Required: N/A In-Kind and/or Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
The Salt Lake City Police Department applied to the Target Police Reform and Racial Justice Grant Program to
enhance its mental health and law enforcement co-responder initiative. If awarded, the Department will utilize
funds for:
1) Immigrant and minority outreach and education - the department will enhance staff resources to engage with
and educate the community. This effort will focus on districts with higher immigrant and minority
populations and will seek to provide information about the initiative, educate citizens on how individuals can
access crisis services, and ultimately built trust with individuals in these target populations.
2) Expanded coverage and equipment - the department will expand co-responder team coverage to
nights/weekends and provide ballistic vests to mental health professionals.
3) Training - the department will focus on three components of training: a) professional training for current co-
responder team members; b) site visits with other agencies implementing co-responder initiatives, c) internal
training to patrol officers and detectives on the initiative and how to best utilize department resources.
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
4.Rose Park Bicycle Pump Track – 2021 Utah Outdoor Recreation Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, grant funds will be used to construct a new
bicycle pump track adjacent to the Day Riverside Library along the Jordan River Parkway
Trail in the Rose Park neighborhood. Working with local community groups, the track will
be designed to accommodate non-motorized bikes and provide recreational options for all
skill levels and ages. Ideally, the track would help to activate the adjoining Jordan River
Parkway Trail, natural area, and planned stormwater education area. Additionally, the
transmittal indicates the design of a low-cost linear dirt pump track along the opposite
riverbank between 700 North and the Day-Riverside Library could also be included if
matching funds are secured.
Grant Amount: $100,000
Requested by: Trails & Natural Lands, Parks & Public Lands, Department of Public
Services
Funding Agency: Governor’s Office of Economic Development
Page | 2
Match Requirement: 50% cash match – Source: A CIP request of $700,000 has been
submitted. If not granted, the Division will scale back the project to a dirt pump track using
existing division funds as the match.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Additional information - The Administration provided the following information in response to
Council Staff’s questions:
1. Can you please indicate the specific differences in the project scope with and without the
$700,000 in CIP funding?
If $700k CIP funding is awarded to this project, the plan is to design and construct a .75
acre asphalt pump track along with other bike park amenities including, landscaping,
irrigation and fencing. If no CIP funding is awarded and $100k from the Outdoor Recreation
Grant is awarded, SLC Public Lands plans to work with interested community partners to
identify and secure private or other grant funding to meet the required grant match. A
budget of $150k would allow public lands to construct a scaled back dirt pump track at this
location. The asphalt pump track is considerably more expensive, and the community was
interested in pursuing other funding for a dirt pump track in the case CIP funding was not
allocated.
2.Is the new Rose Park bicycle pump track preferred to be asphalt? Or is the intent to be a dirt
facility regardless of the grant and CIP applications success?
It is the preference of SLC Public Lands and interested community partners to pursue an
asphalt pump track. This option would provide a unique pump track that does not exist
anywhere in Salt Lake County at this time. This style of track is more accessible to a wider
range of users including bicycles, scooters, and skateboards and is also easier for younger
kids than a traditional dirt pump track. An asphalt track would also require less ongoing
maintenance than a traditional a dirt pump track.
3.Would the addition of one or two new bicycle pump tracks create the need for more
groundskeepers to maintain the sites or could existing staff absorb this workload?
SLC Public Lands currently has two part time staff that maintain the 9-Line Bike Park. This
small team has been able to successfully maintain that park since its creation in 2017. It is
anticipated that an asphalt pump track at this location would require some additional
maintenance, estimated at $7,500 annually. If a dirt pump track is constructed we
anticipate we would need to increase the existing maintenance capacity of our team by
hiring one-two additional part time staff at $25,000 annually. In addition to this staffing
increase, we anticipate the dirt pump track would require bi-annual contractor
maintenance of $5,000-10,000.
Grant Application Submission Notification
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jensen, Rachel Otto, Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Shaffer, Cindy Lou Trishman,
Brijette Williams
CC: Janyce Fowles, Elizabeth Gerhart, Tyler Murdock, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Jordan
Smith, Kory Solorio, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE 23 March 2021
SUBJECT: Rose Park Pump Track
FUNDING AGENCY: Governor’s Office of Economic Development
GRANT PROGRAM: 2021 Utah Outdoor Recreation Grant
AMOUNT REQUESTED: $100,000
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Trail & Natural Lands|Parks & Public Lands|Dept of Public Services
COLLABORATING AGENCIES:
DATE SUBMITTED: March 19,2021
SPECIFICS:
Technical Assistance (Training) Equipment Only
Provides FTE Position(s)
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required _50% ____________ In- Kind and Cash
New Program (City not performing function now)
GRANT DETAILS:
The Rose Park pump track project will construct a new bicycle pump track adjacent to the Day Riverside
library along the Jordan River Parkway Trail within the Rose Park neighborhood. The project will work with
local community groups to design and develop a unique bicycling amenity that will help activate this open
space along the Jordan River and provide a new recreational feature to the Jordan River Parkway trail that is
ideal for young kids and experienced riders of all ages. With limited access to mountain bike amenities in the
Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods, this project will provide the community with much needed
recreational opportunities in this area. This project will design and construct a professional bike pump track
the proposed design-build custom pump track would be usable by non-motorized bikes and will provide
options for fun and skills progression at all skill levels and ages. Proposed pump track would create an
awesome recreation amenity on the Jordan River with citywide appeal and would help activate the adjoining
Jordan River Parkway Trail, natural area, and planned stormwater education area. sufficient. Design of a low-
cost linear dirt pump track along the opposite riverbank between 700 N and the Day-Riverside Library could
also be included if matching funds are secured. The Match is met with the CIP request of $700,000 currently
awaiting a decision. If the CIP request is not granted, the Division will scale back the project to a dirt pump
track using existing division funds as the match.
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:June 8, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 8, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
5.PaddleShare: Facilitating Self-Serve Kayak Rental on the Jordan River – Utah
Outdoor Recreation Grant Program
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, grant funds will be used to construct kayak
equipment lockers and paddleshare stations along the Jordan River. Kayakers, rafters and
canoeists will be able to use the equipment and stations for outdoor recreation purposes.
Lockers are accessed when users communicate with the locker reservation using a
smartphone app. Once a user leaves the river they will deposit the equipment in a locker at
a paddleshare station downstream. The transmittal indicates that the City completed
construction of three new recreational boat access points, including Fisher Mansion,
Gadsby Trailhead and the Riverview Trailhead.
Grant Amount: $100,000
Requested by: Trails & Natural Lands, Parks & Public Lands, Department of Public
Services
Funding Agency: Governor’s Office for Economic Development
Page | 2
Match Requirement: 50% cash match – Source: Trails & Natural Lands Division’s
budget. Half of the match ($50,000) will be allocated July 1, 2021, and the remaining
$50,000 will be allocated July 1, 2022.
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Additional Information – The Administration has provided the following information in
response to Council Staff’s questions:
a)How do users without smartphones participate in the Paddle Share program?
The intention is to create a paddleshare rental interface that is compatible with
smartphones, a traditional web interface that can be accessed from any computer with an
internet connection, and also directly from an interface at the physical paddleshare rental
station. This is identical to the model utilized by Minneapolis, MN for the Mississippi River
PaddleShare network.
b) Are there navigational hazards or obstacles in/across the Jordan River that impede success of
the Paddle Share program?
Periodically, fallen trees, tree limbs, and other debris create a navigational hazard along
Salt Lake City’s section of the Jordan River that would impede safe passage for Paddle Share
program users. A key component of the operational model for the Jordan River
PaddleShare is an ongoing contract with a debris removal contractor that would insure the
PaddleShare river segments are free of navigational hazards at the beginning of each rental
season in the spring, and which would remain on-call through the season for debris
removal requests should new navigational hazards appear over the course of the rental
season. PaddleShare staff & volunteers would be responsible for traveling the Jordan River
each day of active operation and reporting new hazards to the debris removal contractor
for timely removal. In certain circumstances, the equipment rental program could be halted
until impassible debris obstacles could be removed from the waterway.
Grant Application Submission Notification
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jensen, Rachel Otto, Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Shaffer, Cindy Lou Trishman,
Brijette Williams
CC: Janyce Fowles, Elizabeth Gerhart, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Jordan Smith, Kory
Solorio, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE 23 March 2021
SUBJECT: PaddleShare: Facilitating Self-Serve Kayak Rental on the Jordan River
FUNDING AGENCY: Governor’s Office for economic Development
GRANT PROGRAM: Utah Outdoor Recreation Grant Program
AMOUNT REQUESTED: $100,000
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Trails & Natural Lands|Parks & Public Lands|Dept of Public Services
COLLABORATING AGENCIES:
DATE SUBMITTED: March 19, 2021
SPECIFICS:
Technical Assistance (Training) Equipment Only
Provides FTE Position(s)
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required __50% ____________ In- Kind and Cash
New Program (City not performing function now)
GRANT DETAILS:
The funds requested will be used to construct the kayak lockers/stations. Kayaks are made available with the
use of self-serve kiosks or PaddleShare “stations.” Stations will consist of an enclosed locker system, with
each station containing multiple lockers and each locker containing all the equipment a user needs to paddle
on the Jordan River to a downstream station. Lockers containing equipment are opened when the user
communicates with the locker reservation system via an app on their smartphone. When the user exits the
river at a downstream PaddleShare station, they similarly open an empty locker using their smartphone and
deposit their equipment.
Salt Lake City’s meandering tree lined section of the Jordan River is arguably the most enjoyable section of the
flat water for paddlers anywhere in Salt Lake Valley but until 2021 the River had almost no recreational
infrastructure to support canoeists, kayakers or rafters wanting to float through the Salt Lake City section.
Thanks to funding from UORG, in 2021 Salt Lake City completed the construction of three new recreational
boat access points located at Fisher Mansion (1206 West 200 South), Gadsby Trailhead (1200 West North
Temple) and the Riverview Trailhead at (1800 North Redwood Road). These new access points complement
the existing Exchange Club Marina at 1700 South, and the North Salt Lake UORG-funded Porter’s Landing at
Center Street
The matching funds have been requested as part of the Trails & Natural Lands Division’s FY22 budgeting
process. Approval of matching funds is expected July 1, 2021. $50,000 in matching funds would be allocated
July 1, 2021; the remaining $50,000 would be allocated July 1, 2022.
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
6. Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence Advocate Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the cost of
hiring a full-time domestic violence victim advocate to assist victims of domestic violence as
their cases move through the court processes. Until this year, the Salt Lake County District
Attorney Victim Services provided support for victims whose cases are handled in the Salt
Lake City Justice Court. As a result of budget cutbacks, however, victim advocates are being
reassigned to county prosecutions. If approved, this position would assist to fill the gap in
services. The City is requesting this position for a two-year timeframe. The transmittal
indicates that the Prosecutor’s Office is aware that this grant funded position will not be
continued when the grant period has ended.
Grant Amount: $36,410 each for Year 1 and Year 2
Requested By: Salt Lake City Prosecutor, City Attorney’s Office
Page | 2
Funding Agency: Utah Office for Victims of Crimes
Match Requirement: 25% cash match ($11,440 for each year) – Source: Attorney’s Office
budget
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jensen, Rachel Otto, Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Shaffer, Cindy Lou Trishman,
Brijette Williams
CC: Scott Fisher, Janyce Fowles, Elizabeth Gerhart, Katie, Lewis, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson,
Jordan Smith, Kory Solorio, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE 21 April 2021
SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Prosecutor Domestic Violence Victim Advocate
FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Office for Victims of Crime
GRANT PROGRAM: Violence Against Women Act (VOCA)
AMOUNT REQUESTED: Fiscal Year 1 $36,410
Fiscal Year 2 $36,410
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: SLC Prosecutor|Office of the City Attorney
COLLABORATING AGENCIES:
DATE SUBMITTED: April 20, 2021
SPECIFICS:
Technical Assistance (Training) Equipment Only
Provides 1 FTE Position(s)
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation: The City has requested funding for a victim advocate for the 2 year performance period
Match Required _25% FY1 $11,440 FY2 $11,440 ____________ In- Kind and Cash
New Program (City not performing function now)
GRANT DETAILS:
The Prosecutor’s Office is requesting a victim advocate to assist and support victims of domesic violence as
their cases move to the prosecution and adjudication phases. The services include information, education and
advocacy through the case and prosecution, assistance with victim impact statements, support and
accompaniment to court and meetings with investigators and prosecutors. The Victim Advocate assists in post
release safety planning, preparation for court appearances, and jail release agreements.
Until this year, Salt Lake County District Attorney Victim Services has provided this support for victims whose
cases are ajudicated in Salt Lake City Justice Court. Funding cutbacks required the county to reassign the
advocates to County prosecutions. Salt Lake City is applying for this new city position to fill the gap in services.
The match is $11,440 each fiscal year, for a total of $22,880 for the two year performance perriod of the
grant. The match is met with cash available in the Office of the Attorney’s budget.
The SLC Prosecutor’s Office is aware that thisis a grant funded position and will not be continued when the
grant period has ended.
$72,821 Total
May 6, 2021
2
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSIONS
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
7.Social Impact Bond Study (EDA CARES Act COVID 19 Recovery Technical
Assistance Grant)
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, Wasatch Front Regional Council will hire a
consultant to work with the Economic Development to perform a social impact bond study.
The Letter of Intent indicates that “the west side of Salt Lake City has been historically
underserved, redlined, and experienced historical disinvestment”, including barriers
(railroad tracks and freeway), as well as disproportionate impacts on various west side
populations. The Administration indicates that the study will assess economic and
opportunity disparities with particular focus on our west side and propose interventions
that may help mitigate these disparities. The study will also put together financing
mechanisms to invest in the interventions highlighted in the study.
Page | 2
Grant Amount: $50,000
Requested by: Department of Economic Development
Funding Agency: Wasatch Regional Economic Development District, Wasatch Regional
Front Council
Match Requirement: - 0 –
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Grant Application Submission Notification
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jensen, Rachel Otto, Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Shaffer, Cindy Lou Trishman,
Brijette Williams
CC: Janyce Fowles, Elizabeth Gerhart, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Jordan Smith, Kory
Solorio, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE 23 March 2021
SUBJECT: Social Impact Bond Study
FUNDING AGENCY: Wasatch Regional Economic Development District|Wasatch Regional Front Council
GRANT PROGRAM: EDA CARES Act COVID 19 Recovery Technical Assistance Grant
AMOUNT REQUESTED: $50,000
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Economic Development
COLLABORATING AGENCIES:
DATE SUBMITTED: September 19, 2020
SPECIFICS:
Technical Assistance (Training) Equipment Only
Provides FTE Position(s)
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required __ ____________ In- Kind and Cash
New Program (City not performing function now)
GRANT DETAILS:
Economic Development submitted a Letter of Interest to WFRC for assistance with a Social Impact Bond Study
and was waiting for a decision and a request for a full application. The Wasatch Front Economic Development
District awarded the technical assistance grant based on the Letter of Intent. The WFRC will hire an
appropriate consultant to work with the Department of Economic Development to perform the study.
Item G1-G8
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR GRANT PUBLIC HEARING
The Council will hold a Public Hearing and receive public comment on Grant Application Items
G-1 through G-8. After the end of public comment, the Council may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items G-1 through G-8 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Budget Analyst
DATE: June 15, 2021
RE: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GRANT
APPLICATION SUBMISSION
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: Not required.
Set Date: Not required.
Public Hearing: June 15, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Council Sponsor: No sponsor / Budget item
_________________________________________________________________
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration has submitted eight grant applications. In an effort to ensure that the City
Council, Council staff and the public has adequate opportunity to see and comment on them,
the grant application notifications will be included in the Council meeting agendas under
Public Hearings. There won’t be a set date since this is not a required hearing.
8.2022 Police Traffic Services Equipment Grant
Purpose/Goal of the Grant: If awarded, the grant monies will be used to fund the
purchase of 100 traffic cones and 50 barricades and decals to assist the Motors Squad with
traffic control during special events, and to restrict or divert traffic due to accidents.
Grant Amount: $3,600
Requested by: Police Department
Funding Agency: Utah Department of Public Safety, Highway Safety Office
Match Requirement: - 0 –
Staff Recommendation: Please refer to motion sheet.
Gr ant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust -Jenson, Rachel Otto, Lisa Shaffer, Mary Beth Thompson, Cindy Lou
Trishman, Brijette Williams
CC: Sarah Behrens, Mike Brown, Shellie Dietrich, Tim Doubt, Elizabeth Gerhart, Mark Kittrell, Jaysen
Oldroyd, Melyn Osmond, Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Linda Sanchez, Kory Solorio, Lehua
Weaver
FROM: J ordan Smith
DATE: April 13, 2021
SUBJECT: 2022 Police Traffic Services Equipment Program
FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Public Safety, Hi ghway Safety Office
GRANT PROGRAM: Police Traffic Services Equipment Program
REQUESTED AMOUNT: $3,600
DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Police Department
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A
DATE SUBMITTED: April 7, 2021
SPECIFICS:
E quipment/Supplies
Technical Assistance (Training)
Provides FTE Position
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required: In-Kind and/or Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
The Salt Lake City Police Department is requesting $3,600 to purchase 100 traffic cones and 50 barricades
(+decals). These items will be used by the Motors Squad for traffic control during special events, restricting or
diverting traffic due to accidents, etc.
Item H1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Russell Weeks
Senior Policy Analyst
DATE:June 10, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET – LIBRARY SYSTEM BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2
MOTION 1 – To amend the Library System budget:
I move that the City Council adopt the ordinance amending the final budget for the Library Fund for
the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020, and ending June 30, 2021.
MOTION 2 – To not amend the Library System budget:
I move that the City Council NOT adopt the ordinance amending the final budget for the Library Fund
for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020, and ending June 30, 2021.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF NOTE
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Russell Weeks
Senior Policy Analyst
DATE:October 31, 2022 at 9:37 PM
RE: LIBRARY SYSTEM BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2
Reminder: [[Insert a link to View the Administration’s proposal]]
NEW INFORMATION
The City Council held a public hearing on this item June 8. Three people spoke in opposition
to the proposed amendment. Their comments were based on the ultimate locations of property tax
revenue. It should be noted that the proposed amendment largely is a bookkeeping exercise required
by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The item is identical to two items that are part of
Budget Amendment No. 9 which the Council also is scheduled to consider at its June 15 meeting.
A motion sheet is attached to this staff note. Motion No. 1 – a motion to adopt the proposed
ordinance – probably is the most appropriate for two reasons: 1.) Tracking the revenue is required by
the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. 2.) Tracking the revenue identifies where a portion of
Library Fund property tax revenue is being allocated.
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
This item is a public hearing on a budget amendment for the Salt Lake City Public Library
System’s budget for the current fiscal year which ends June 30. The proposed amendment largely is a
bookkeeping exercise required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board – the independent
board that establishes accounting and financial reporting standards for U.S. state and local
Item Schedule:
Briefing: (Written) May 18,
2021
Set Date: May 18, 2021
Public Hearing: June 8, 2021
Potential Action: June 15,
2021
Page | 2
governments that follow the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – “the rules that encompass
the details … and legalities of business and corporate accounting.”1
Council staff has prepared a motion sheet pertaining to the public hearing. Given the
circumstances, Motion No. 1 to close the hearing and refer action to a later date probably is the most
appropriate.
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
This item is identical to two bookkeeping items the City Council is considering as part of
Budget Amendment No. 9. The items require Salt Lake City to track property tax revenue for the Utah
Inland Port and the Salt Palace Convention Center hotel.2 The Council held the second public hearing
on Budget Amendment No. 9 at its June 1 meeting.
According to the transmittal letter, the Library System is seeking a $270,000 increase to
its Fiscal Year 2021 general fund budget, but the proposed increase will in essence track
property tax revenue earmarked for the Inland Port and the Convention Center. Like the City, the
Library System is required to budget and account for pass-through property tax revenue
collected by Salt Lake County and remitted directly to the Utah Inland Port Authority and the
Convention Center hotel.
According to the transmittal, “Neither of these entities has taxing authority, so the
respective governments with taxing authority to which the tax revenues would have gone must
show the revenue and a corresponding expenditure in their financial statements as required by
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements 33 and 77.”3
1 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, www.accounting.com.
2 The following items are from a City Council staff report by Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards, May 4, 2021, Page 5 :
A-5: Budgeting for Inland Port Tax Revenue ($ - 0 - Budget Neutral) As part of the City's annual financial audit, the City was informed it
needs to budget and account for City tax revenue within the boundaries of the Inland Port. Because the tax revenue is dispersed directly to
the inland port, the City does not receive the tax revenue. The City will budget a line item to recognize the tax revenue and a corresponding
expenditure account recognizing the pass-through, so City revenue is not overstated. A $500,000 portion of the Inland Port revenue was
accounted for in Budget Amendment #7 of this fiscal year. This amendment will account for the remaining $483,242 in anticipated revenue.
At the time of writing Budget Amendment #7, the City did not know when actual tax revenue would be determined. The final revenue
allocation was received on March 30.
A-6: Budgeting for Convention Hotel Tax Revenue ($ - 0 - Budget Neutral) As part of the City's annual financial audit, the City was informed
it needs to budget and account for City tax revenue at the Convention Center Hotel. Because the tax revenue is dispersed directly to the
convention hotel, the City does not receive the tax revenue. The City will budget a line item to recognize the tax revenue and a corresponding
expenditure account, so City revenue is not overstated. This amendment is for the $10,116 in anticipated revenue. The hotel is being built on
County-owned property. This means the property was tax-exempt and became taxable with the hotel construction. The GOED Development
Board adopted a motion on November 6, 2018 which approved the following incentive package under authority of Utah Code 63N-2-503.5.
Approve Salt Lake City CH, LLC for a post-performance, New Convention Facility Development, Incentive consisting of: Up to 100% of the
new incremental State Sales Tax not to exceed $75,000,000 over 20 years Up to 100% of local (city and county) sales tax and property tax
over 25 years Including conveyance of land from Salt Lake County to Salt Lake City CH, LLC State law includes language to hold the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) harmless for existing debt obligations (bonds). Some hotel increment could be used to meet RDA bond
payments if needed in the future. The County is required to provide an annual report identifying tax increment generated by the hotel
property. See Attachment 1 for a letter from the Salt Lake County Auditor that provides a breakdown of tax increment revenues being
diverted by taxing entity. A-7: Presumption for CARES Act Funding – ($-293,06
3 Memorandum, former Library System Executive Director Peter Bromberg, April 19, 2021.
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: ________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 4, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Library Budget Amendment #2
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2020-21 Library Fund adopted
budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
LIBRARY FUND $ 270,000.00 $ 270,000.00
LIBRARY CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 0.00 0.00
TOTAL $ 270,000.00 $ 270,000.00
Lisa Shaffer (May 11, 2021 09:31 MDT)
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
On April 26th, the Salt Lake City Public Library’s Board of Directors approved a budget
amendment for the Library Fund that would leave an unrestricted fund balance well above the 16
percent target balance. The Administration is requesting the City Council adopt the proposed
budget amendment of $270,000.00 for the Library Fund.
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Second Amendment of the Final Budget for the Library Budget of
Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2020-21)
An ordinance amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 25 of 2020 which adopted the
final budget for the Library fund of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2020 and ending June 30, 2021.
PREAMBLE
On June 16, 2020, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget for the Library
fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021,
in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, copies of which are
attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget for
the Library fund of Salt Lake City as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City
Ordinance No. 25 of 2020.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, attached hereto and
made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into
the budget for the Library fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020
and ending June 30, 2021, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128, of the Utah
Code.
2
SECTION 3. Certification to Utah State Auditor. The City’s Policy and Budget
Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy
of said budget amendments with the Utah State Auditor.
SECTION 4. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments in the office of said
Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for
public inspection.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on its first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _______________,
2021.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2021.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
_________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd
Date:____________________
MEMO | April 19, 2021
To: Salt Lake City Public Library Board of Directors, Salt Lake City Administration and City Council
From: Peter Bromberg, Executive Director
Re: Budget Amendment 2 for FY2020-21
Library Administration is requesting a $270,000 increase to the FY21 general fund budget. This increase
is required to budget and account for pass-through property tax revenue collected by Salt Lake County
and remitted directly to the Utah Inland Port Authority and the Convention Facility. Neither of these
entities has taxing authority, so the respective governments with taxing authority to which the tax
revenues would have gone must show the revenue and a corresponding expenditure in their financial
statements as required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements 33 and 77. This
requirement was noted as part of the Salt Lake City’s FY 2020 audit, and the issue has been discussed
with Paul Skeen, the Library’s independent auditor, and Seth Oveson from the Office of the State Auditor
of Utah, both of whom confirmed this requirement. The City has a similar amendment moving through
the approval process.
Administration is requesting that this amendment be approved at the April 26, 2021 meeting, so the
amendment can be forwarded to the Salt Lake City Administration and City Council. The amendment is
time sensitive and needs to be approved by both the Library Board and Salt Lake City Council prior to the
end of FY2021.
General Fund – Proposed increase of $270,000
Account Name Budget
Amount
Requested
Amount
Amended
Amount
Funding Sources
CY Property Taxes-Pass Through $0 $270,000 $270,000
Totals $0 $270,000 $270,000
Expenditures
Payments to Other Governments $0 $270,000 $270,000
Totals $0 $270,000 $270,000
Recommended Motion:
Move to approve an increase to the Library’s FY21 general fund budget of $270,000.
City Budget Director Analyst, City Council Date
Item H2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards
Budget Analysts
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: Budget Amendment Number Nine FY21 - Adoption
MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the FY 2020-21 final budget of Salt Lake City
including the employment staffing document as shown on the motion sheet.
Staff note: Council Members do not need to read the individual items being approved below; they are
listed for reference.
A-1: Pulled prior to submission.
A-2: Pulled prior to submission.
A-3: Pulled prior to submission.
A-4: Pulled prior to submission.
A-5: Budgeting for Inland Port Tax Revenue – ($ - 0 - )
A-6: Budgeting for Convention Hotel Tax Revenue – ($ - 0 - )
A-7: Presumption for CARES Act Funding – ($-293,067 – General Fund)
A-8: Fire Emergency Management Office Build-Out – ($293,067 – General Fund)
A-9: 911-ETM Security Platform – ($41,138 – E911 Fund)
D-1: Police Impact Fee Refund – ($510,828 – Police Impact Fees)
D-2: Moving Transportation CIP Projects to CIP Fund – ($8,695,770 – CIP Fund)
D-3: Transfer CIP Funds to Refuse Fund – ($46,982 – CIP Fund)
D-4: Transfer Bond Funds from 700 West Cost Center to Bond Contingency – ($917,854 – CIP Fund)
D-5: Corrections for Debt Transfer Errors in Original Adopted Budget – ($78,291 – Debt
Service/General Fund)
D-6: Donation Fund Increase – ($200,000 – Donation Fund)
D-7: Fire Department – Wildland/Search & Rescue Deployments – ($230,683 – General Fund)
D-8: Fire Department – Other Reimbursements – ($59,126 – General Fund)
D-9: Fire Department COVID Costs – ($605,435 – General Fund)
E-1: Salt Lake County, CATNIP, Reconfigure Gilmer Drive – ($55,365 – CIP Fund)
E-2: CARES ACT Third Tranche – ($150,000 – Grant Fund)
G-1: Utah State Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services, FY20 Paul Coverdell Forensic
Science Improvement Grant Program – ($19,500 – Grant Fund)
I-1: Council-added item ARPA Reimbursement to General Fund Balance for Eligible Employee Bonuses
– ($1,193,000 from ARPA)
I-2: Council-added item Rescope Remaining Budget for the Salt Laker Card to Allow Second $500
Payments, $1,000 New Cards and Covering Nonprofit Program Administration Costs
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
Page | 1
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards
Budget and Policy Analysts
DATE:June 1, 2021
RE: Budget Amendment Number Nine FY2021
________________________________________________________________________________
NEW INFORMATION
Administration Request for Council-added Item: $1,193,000 Reimbursement to Fund Balance with
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Dollars for Some Employee Bonuses in Budget Amendment #7
The U.S. Treasury Department issued guidance on eligible uses of ARPA dollars after the Administration transmitted
Budget Amendment #9. The Department stated bonuses are an eligible use of ARPA dollars for non-teleworking duties
by “workers who have been and continue to be relied on to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical
infrastructure sectors, including those who are critical to protecting the health and wellbeing of their communities.”
In Budget Amendment #7 the Council approved a total of $4,943,048 from Fund Balance for one-time bonuses to all
City employees. After reviewing employee work statuses (remote vs in-person) with departments and legal and financial
review of Treasury’s ARPA guidance, the Administration determined that a total of $2,527,500 is eligible. However, the
Administration is recommending a lower amount of $1,193,000 to reimburse the General Fund’s Fund Balance because
that is the amount tied to general funded positions.
The Administration provided the below table showing a breakdown of the proposed reimbursement to Fund Balance
using ARPA dollars. Note that adding the two amounts highlighted in green yields the total General Fund
Reimbursement. The three other amounts under the “In Person” column for the Airport, Public Utilities and
Sustainability enterprise funds are eligible, however, the Administration is not recommending. It’s important to note
that the Airport received over $82 million directly from the Federal Aviation Administration from the CARES Act
Airport Grant Program, and additional funding is expected for the Airport from ARPA.
Policy Question: The Council may wish to ask the Administration why reimbursements to Public
Utilities and Sustainability enterprise funds are not being recommended. The Council may also wish
to discuss with the Administration pros and cons of preserving ARPA funding for General Fund
opportunities.
Row Labels In Person Remote Work Grand Total
Airport 624,000$ 624,000$
General Fund 1,185,000$ 348,500$ 1,533,500$
IMS 36,500$ 36,500$
Public Utilities 620,000$ 500$ 620,500$
RDA 8,000$ 11,000$ 19,000$
Sustainability 90,500$ 4,500$ 95,000$
Grand Total 2,527,500$ 401,000$ 2,928,500$
Total of General Fund reimbursement 1,193,000$
Project Timeline:
Set Date: May 4, 2021
1st Briefing: May 11, 2021
Public Hearing: May 18, 2021
2nd Briefing: June 1, 2021
Potential Action: June 1, 2021
Page | 2
The Administration determined that the $2.5 million approved in Budget Amendment #7 to replace the Central Plant
boilers is not an allowable use of ARPA dollars under existing Treasury guidance.
$680,284 Remaining Budget for the Salt Laker Card (Raise Up SLC Program)
At the May 11 briefing, Council Members discussed the importance of spending all the remaining CARES Act funds
before the September 2021 deadline. Two options were mentioned during the discussion to change the
eligibility criteria and/or provide a second round of $500 payments. The Administration recommends the full
remaining budget be used to provide a second round of $500 payments to existing debit card holders. Newly issued
debit cards would have a $1,000 balance. Reloading existing cards would spend approximately $600,000. The
remaining approximately $80,000 would be used on new cards and program administration costs.
Changing the eligibility criteria could require contracting with other nonprofits, reaching households that would qualify
and spending the full remaining budget within less than four months. The complexity of this approach would depend on
what population(s) the Council wants to target for new criteria. Another option would be a hybrid approach of expanded
criteria and reloading existing cards (could be less than $500). Changes to the program under any of these approaches
could be a Council-added item to this budget amendment to approve the new scope of how the funds may be used.
Policy Question: The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration which approach is
preferred for the remaining budget. If changing eligibility criteria, then the Council may also wish to
identify who would qualify given the upcoming deadline.
Three Pending Updates to the City’s Impact Fees Plan (Parks, Fire and Police sections)
At the May 11 briefing, Council Members asked about the status of updating the three remaining sections of the Impact
Fees Plan. The Administration reports the consultant completed updates to the fire and parks sections. After the
proposed updates are reviewed (and any adjustments requested by the Administration), they will be transmitted to the
Council for consideration.
An update to the police section is in development. A dataset has been gathered which will serve as the basis for
calculating new police impact fees by land use type. The Administration is determining future capital needs for the
Police Departments, how those relate to population growth and what percentage of the project would be eligible for
impact fee funding. A proposal is expected to be transmitted to the Council in the summer.
Note that the Council approved an update to the transportation section last year to allow impact fees to be leveraged
with the 2018 voter-approved Streets Reconstruction Bond. This allow combining the two funding sources to
reconstruct more streets with more amenities to advance the complete streets ordinance and helps avoid expiring
transportation impact fees.
Policy Question: The Council may wish to ask the Administration to include Fire vehicles as an
eligible cost in the forthcoming update to the fire section of the Impact Fee Plan based on discussions
during the Fleet Division budget briefing.
A-9: 911-ETM Security Platform – ($41,138 – E911 Fund)
At the May 11 briefing, the Administration provided an update that this item would have ongoing costs of $25,990
annually. This includes $25,200 for monitoring services and another $790 for an extended warranty.
Budget Amendment Number Nine includes requested changes to seven funds. Total expenditures are $10,039,223
including $390,659 from Fund Balance. If this budget amendment is approved as requested by the Administration, then
the amount available in Fund Balance above the 13% minimum target would be $6,754,062. There are a total of 17 items
in this amendment, including five in Section A (note that this doesn’t count four items removed prior to transmittal).
Revenues Update
The Administration has provided the following information regarding City revenues: “The City is currently projecting a
$1.9 million decrease in budgeted revenue. The largest portion of the decrease is attributed to a $1.7 million decrease in
Fines and Forfeitures, a $1.7 million decrease in Parking Meter Revenues and a $978 thousand decrease in
Miscellaneous Revenues. These decreases are offset by a projected net increase of $1.4 million in Licenses and
Page | 3
Permits as well as a $1.1 million over adopted budget increase in Sales Tax and a $750 thousand increase in sales tax
attributable to Funding Our Future revenues.
The increase in Licenses and Permits is in spite of airport parking/license tax showing a decrease due to decreased
travel as a result of COVID. The decrease in airport parking and licenses is $2,045,000. Innkeepers’ tax has also been
hit hard by COVID and is projecting a decrease of $1,717,500. According to the local news, hotels are experiencing 30%
occupancy compared to this time of year in previous years. Business license are also expected to be below budget due to
trends for apartment units, new business license and renew business licenses. These losses are offset by gains in permits
& zoning building permits (+$1.1M), plan check fees (+$1.5M), and street excavation (+$1.96M due to a temporary
boost from Google contract).
Fines and Forfeitures are projected below budget due to a decrease in parking ticket revenue of $750k. Justice Court
fines are down $185k, while moving violations are projected at a loss of $699k. The Justice Court is following the order
of the Administrative Office of the Courts which is resulting in fewer court cases and no orders to pay fines, which are
then subsequently not sent to collections and no warrants are being issued. Traffic school revenue is down $61k and
vehicle booting is projected to be down $19k.
Parking Meter Collection is slightly less than half of the previous fiscal year due to an overall decrease in traffic
downtown. This is driving the significant decrease of $1.7 million. Additionally, Miscellaneous Revenue has also
been affected by the pandemic with decreases in accounts receivable collections, special event revenue, fuel
reimbursement due to the Mayor’s emergency declaration and utility reimbursement.
Page | 4
Page | 5
Fund Balance Update
Fund Balance remains above fifteen percent, after projected use of fund balance in the current amendment and
the reduction in projected revenues.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
Salt Laker Card Raise Up SLC Program Update
See Attachment 2 for a budget update through March 2021
In budget amendments #2 and #4 the Council approved a total of $1,426,264 for this program. The program has
received $178,184 in donations from other organizations and individuals for a total budget of $1,604,448.
The Community Foundation of Utah provides $500 pre-paid debit cards to other community-based organizations
working with undocumented populations. The recipients are at or below the federal poverty line and mostly
undocumented or mixed-status households where one family member is undocumented. Funding is targeted to City
residents on a first come first served basis.
When the Council approved funding last year the program expected to provide $500 cards to approximately 2,700
households that were ineligible for federal stimulus payments. Since then the Federal Government under a new
administration changed the eligibility criteria for stimulus payments. The criteria were expanded to include mixed-
status households. As a result, the number of Salt Lake City households eligible for the Salt Laker Card was
significantly reduced; a household may only receive the federal stimulus or a Salt Laker Card. Approximately 1,000
households have received a pre-paid debit card under the program.
As of March 31, 2021, the program spent nearly $500,000 on the pre-paid debit cards, another $349,000 is
currently available but not distributed pre-paid debit cards and $75,164 was spent on administration and
promotion expenses. This leaves a remaining unused budget of $680,284.
Policy Questions:
➢Deadline to Use CARES Funds – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if unused funds will need
to be returned to the Federal Government at a certain date.
➢Alternative Uses for $680,284 Remaining Budget – The Council may wish to ask if the Administration has
a recommendation for how to use the remaining budget or may wish to discuss other CARES-eligible
Council priorities. The Council may also wish to ask the Administration if the City has expenses eligible
under the CARES Act which did not receive funding in earlier budget amendments and could use the
funding this fiscal year.
Amending Appointed Pay Plan
On April 20 the Council amended the Appointed Pay Plan. The Administration is requesting another amendment to
recognize an existing Deputy Chief of Staff in the Mayor’s Office. The position is already listed on the staffing
document and was funded in the Council-adopted FY21 annual budget. The position has been vacant this fiscal
year. Amending the Appointed Pay Plan to recognize the existing position is a housekeeping correction. If the
Council supports this amendment, then it could be scheduled for a vote as soon as May 18.
Impact Fees Update
The Administration provided a summary of impact fee tracking, details on refunding amounts and dates and lists of
unfinished projects with impact fee funding. The information is current as of April 1, 2021. $1,718 of police impact
fees are scheduled to expire in April. The Administration reports work is nearing completion to update the fire and
parks sections of the impact fee plan. Eligible projects for police impact fees are being identified.
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring
Impact Fees
Fire $930,142 More than a year away -
Parks $7,097,114 More than a year away -
Police $395,285 April 2021 $1,718
Transportation $5,013,594 More than a year away -
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
Section A: New Items
(note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the
transmittal for some of these items)
Page | 7
A-1: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-2: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-3: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-4: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-5: Budgeting for Inland Port Tax Revenue ($ - 0 - Budget Neutral)
As part of the City's annual financial audit, the City was informed it needs to budget and account for City tax
revenue within the boundaries of the Inland Port. Because the tax revenue is dispersed directly to the inland port,
the City does not receive the tax revenue. The City will budget a line item to recognize the tax revenue and a
corresponding expenditure account recognizing the pass-through, so City revenue is not overstated. A $500,000
portion of the Inland Port revenue was accounted for in Budget Amendment #7 of this fiscal year. This amendment
will account for the remaining $483,242 in anticipated revenue. At the time of writing Budget Amendment #7, the
City did not know when actual tax revenue would be determined. The final revenue allocation was received on
March 30.
A-6: Budgeting for Convention Hotel Tax Revenue ($ - 0 - Budget Neutral)
As part of the City's annual financial audit, the City was informed it needs to budget and account for City tax
revenue at the Convention Center Hotel. Because the tax revenue is dispersed directly to the convention hotel, the
City does not receive the tax revenue. The City will budget a line item to recognize the tax revenue and a
corresponding expenditure account, so City revenue is not overstated. This amendment is for the $10,116 in
anticipated revenue.
The hotel is being built on County-owned property. This means the property was tax-exempt and became taxable
with the hotel construction. The GOED Development Board adopted a motion on November 6, 2018 which
approved the following incentive package under authority of Utah Code 63N-2-503.5. Approve Salt Lake City CH,
LLC for a post-performance, New Convention Facility Development, Incentive consisting of:
Up to 100% of the new incremental State Sales Tax not to exceed $75,000,000 over 20 years
Up to 100% of local (city and county) sales tax and property tax over 25 years
Including conveyance of land from Salt Lake County to Salt Lake City CH, LLC
State law includes language to hold the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) harmless for existing debt obligations
(bonds). Some hotel increment could be used to meet RDA bond payments if needed in the future. The County is
required to provide an annual report identifying tax increment generated by the hotel property. See Attachment 1
for a letter from the Salt Lake County Auditor that provides a breakdown of tax increment revenues being diverted
by taxing entity.
A-7: Presumption for CARES Act Funding – ($-293,067 – General Fund)
The Council approved the use of unspent CARES funds for Fire personnel expenses. This amendment removes
personnel expenses in Fire that were used for this method and passes the eligible budget from previously budgeted
line items to Fire. Note that this item is related to items A-8 and E-2 below. The Administration provided the
following accounting summary:
1. Salt Lake City received a 3rd bucket of federal money in December. This needed to be spent by the 21st of
December and reported to Salt Lake County. This amount was $150,000.
2. Once all the actuals had been expensed for both the internet allowance and the hazard pay there was
remaining budget. This amount needs to also be accounted for by December 21st, 2020 to Salt Lake County,
and those remaining dollars were accounted for through Fire personnel expenses.
3. The Fire personnel services were used for both totals above.
4. Since these the expenses were reduced in the Fire Department the General Fund budget needs to be
reduced as well
Page | 8
5. This funding then becomes available to use for a General Fund use. The administration is requesting to use
this funding to accommodate the Emergency Management Division relocating to the Fire Department.
A-8: Fire Emergency Management Office Build Out – ($293,067 – General Fund)
The Administration is proposing to use the third round of CARES Act funding ($150,000) and the remaining
unspent amounts from the first two round ($143,067.36) to build office space for Emergency Management within
the Fire Department. Emergency Management is growing and is currently limited in office space. The current staff
reside on the 3rd floor of the PSB, many in spaces designed as common space or break-out rooms. Adjacent to this
area, is open floor space that can be converted to office space. This would include 2 new Division Chief offices, 2
new Captain offices, plus cubicle space and open space. Construction budget is estimated at $275,000 plus
furniture requirements of $42,000. Fire Department funds will be used to complete any additional costs not
covered in this amendment.
A-9: 911-ETM Security Platform – ($41,138 – E911 Fund)
SLC911 has seen an unprecedented surge of digital attacks on their 911 and administrative lines. The result has been
a telephone denial of service attack (TDoS) which means that a series of calls spoof incoming lines by merging other
public safety answering points together, or robo calling which overwhelms lines for service. While we have been
fortunate to date, we are seeing this behavior more frequently. Without this protection, our communities are at risk
and it would have a devastating impact on the ability of the center to answer emergency calls. SLC911 is requesting
emergency funding to purchase an enterprise voice network security platform. This platform includes hardware,
software, and monitoring services. The managed services will monitor 911's administrative systems for threats and
respond with specific recommendations to mitigate any attacks. This funding is requested to come from Fund 60,
the E911 Tax Fund, not the General Fund.
Hardware $9,685
Licensing $2,878
Installation/Training $3,375
Monitoring Services $25,200
Total Requested $41,138
Additional information such as whether or not there is an annual cost was forthcoming at the time of publishing
this staff report.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section
(None)
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section
(None)
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Police Impact Fee Refund – ($510,828 – Police Impact Fees)
The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property for an East Side Precinct using Police Impact Fees.
The intended property did not work for an eastside police precinct and refunds of the impact fees are now required.
These refunds will be funded primarily with previous unclaimed refunds. The Council may wish to inquire if the
Administration is continuing to pursue an East Side Precinct given evolving conversations about the overall Public
Safety service delivery model.
D-2: Moving Transportation CIP Projects to CIP Fund – ($8,695,770 – CIP Fund)
Currently the Transportation CIP projects reside in the Transportation fund. Because the fund is a
governmental fund, assets will need to be carefully evaluated, capitalized, depreciated, and reported like the regular
CIP funds. This is a time intensive project and one of the biggest bottle necks for the financial audit. To relieve some
of this pressure, we request that the Transportation capital projects be moved to the CIP fund so they can be
processed like the other CIP funds. The funds will be easily identifiable as being funded by the Transportation sales
tax. No additional funding is required as this just moves the funds from the Transportation Fund to the CIP Fund.
Note that all these funds are from the County quarter cent sales tax for transportation.
Page | 9
D-3: Transfer CIP Funds to Refuse Fund – ($46,982 – CIP Fund)
The Department of Sustainability is requesting a budget amendment to transfer $46,982 from CIP to the
Environment and Energy Fund, reflecting the closing out of a previously funded project. During FY19 the
Department of Sustainability transferred $240,000 to CIP to be used in conjunction with a Rocky Mountain Power
Bluesky grant toward installing rooftop solar on the Sorenson Unity Center building. The Sorenson Rooftop Solar
Project is now finished, and the department is requesting that the remaining unused funds of $46,982 be
transferred back into the Environment and Energy Fund (E&E).
Due to the shrinking E&E fund balance these funds are greatly needed and will be used to fund future sustainability
projects and operations.
D-4: Transfer Bond Funds from 700 West Cost Center to Bond Contingency – ($917,854 – CIP
Fund)
The budgetary estimate of construction costs for the 700 West Road Re-Construction Bond project was
$2,000,000. 10% of these funds were assigned to an overall fund for bond contingencies. The 700 West Cost Center
was, therefore, $1,800,000. 700 West was also eligible for $155,000 of Impact Fees. The bids for 700 West came in
well below the budgeted amount. With the completion of construction and the application of Impact Fees, the 700
West project is $917,853.80 below the budgeted amount. This includes the hard and soft costs.
These funds are being requested to be moved to one of the 2020 or 2021 contingency funds so the bond funds can
be expended on upcoming bond road projects.
D-5: Corrections for Debt Transfer Errors in Original Adopted Budget – ($78,291 – Fund Balance
for Debt Service)
During the chaos of the COVID pandemic, the estimated savings from existing cash in the debt service fund of
$22,892 (see CIP book page A6) were subtracted twice. It is necessary to add additional budget to cover sales tax
bonds. Additionally, the City also expected to realize savings from refunding the ESCO debt of $55,399 (see Budget
Book page B21). As the bonds were evaluated in preparation for the refunding, there was not the estimated savings
that were expected. The total amount needed is $78,291.
D-6: Donation Fund Increase – ($200,000 – Donation Fund)
There is a strong possibility that before the year-end the City will receive several large donations that will exceed the
amount approved in the annual budget. It is necessary to have enough budget to accommodate all the donations
and be underbudget by the end of the fiscal year and be in compliance for the audit. As of December 30th, 2020,
there were approximately $80,000 in donations. If the expected donations are received, the City will need
approximately $200,000 in budget. All donations are processed as required through the donation ordinance and
will be reported in detail to Council after the end of the year.
D-7: Fire Department – Reimbursement for Wildland/Search & Rescue Deployments – ($230,683 –
General Fund)
Personnel were deployed several times during Fall 2020. A team was mobilized to Hurricane Laura in August, a
Search & Rescue team assisted in Oregon in September while simultaneously another team volunteered to fight
their Wildfires. The department helped fight the California Wildfires in October. Finally, crews assisted in Utah
County on the Ridge Fire. All costs associated with these deployments will be reimbursed to Salt Lake City. We are
asking the City Council to approve this request to offset personnel costs that include overtime, benefits, and backfill.
This proposal will make the fire department whole as well as the General Fund with offsetting revenues. The request
is only for the amount of revenues we have received.
Expenses
Hurricane Laura - August 2020 $87,572.01
Oregon Wildfire Search & Rescue - September 2020 $234,201.93
Oregon Wildfire - September 2020 $243,468.67
California Wildfire - October 2020 $176,218.51
Utah County Ridge Fire - October 2020 $3,666.00
Total Expense Incurred $745,127.12
Revenues/Reimbursements Received
Page | 10
Hurricane Laura 2/24/2021 $59,328.56
Oregon Search & Rescue 2/24/2021 $167,688.39
Utah County Ridge Fire 3/2/2021 $3,666.00
Reimbursement Rec'd $230,682.95
Remainder of Reimbursement will likely be received in FY22 and will be included in the Mayor’s Recommended
Budget as a one-time revenue and expense line item.
D-8: Fire Department – Other Reimbursements – ($59,126 – General Fund)
The Fire Department has provided several services in which it expects to receive a reimbursement including: Fire
Inspector overtime on behalf of the SLC Airport Redevelopment contractor, backfill costs caused by Utah Search
and Rescue training at their request, Fire Watch services for the Vice Presidential Debate at the University of Utah,
and finally cost recovery efforts from negligent accidents/incidents.
Airport Redevelopment Inspector OT $7,671.50
Utah Search and Rescue (USAR) Training/Backfill $19,006.05
Cost Recovery $28,811.15
Vice Presidential Debate Fire Watch/Standby $3,637.45
Budget Amendment Total $59,126.15
D-9: Fire Department COVID Costs – ($605,435 – General Fund)
COVID19 ERPL and Worker's Compensation claims caused by COVID19 have had a detrimental effect to the Fire
Department's budget. While ERPL was very much appreciated by Fire personnel, it caused a dramatic rise in the
cost of backfilling open shifts. The Fire Department has a 4-handed staffing mandate, meaning each apparatus will
have 4 personnel and the department will "buy back" off duty personnel to fill any gaps. Many times, this cost is
paid out at overtime. When Emergency Responders tested positive for COVID19, it was a presumptive positive,
meaning it was assumed the infection was obtained while working on the job in their role for Salt Lake City. It is
anticipated that some of these costs will eventually be reimbursed by FEMA.
This request is for Worker's Compensation claims directly caused by COVID19, and ERPL associated backfill costs
(Buybacks, Fullstaffs, OT, MRT OT).
WC Claims $155,295
ERPL Backfill $450,140
Total $605,435
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
E-1: Salt Lake County, CATNIP, Reconfigure Gilmer Drive – ($55,365 – CIP Fund)
The Transportation Division received a follow up grant award from Salt Lake County for $55,365 to finish up
the original 9 Line / 900 South Trail. The Gilmer Drive Intersection was not completed during the original
contract period so the funds were unspent.
The County issued a new Interlocal Agreement with the City to finish the project funding from the original
Agreement. This funding is to reconfigure the Gilmer Drive Intersection; move and curb, add a landscaped
separation between bikeway and roadway and install wayfinding signage.
In FY18 The Transportation Division applied for and received a grant from Salt Lake County for $500,000
under the Countywide Active Transportation Network Improvement Program 2017. This grant is to be used for
design and construction of the segment of the 9 Line / 900 South Trail between 900 East and 1300 East.
Construction of the trail segment would occur in conjunction with road reconstruction from Lincoln (950 East)
to 1300 East and the installation of wayfinding signs on 900 South and Gilmer Drive.
This grant has a no match requirement.
A public hearing was held on 12/12/17 on the original grant application for this award.
Page | 11
E-2: CARES ACT Third Tranche – ($150,000 – Grant Fund)
Salt Lake City received $150,000 from the third tranche of CARES Act funding. In BA#4 the Council authorized
the Administration to use the presumption that any amount received in this tranche would cover costs associated
with expenses within the Fire Department. This amendment formalizes that assumption, with the City recognizing
the revenue and an expense associated with the award.
Section F: Donations
(None)
Section G: Council Consent Agenda No. 3 – Grant Awards
G-1: Utah State Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services, FY20 Paul Coverdell
Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program ($19,500 – Grant Fund)
The police department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety’s Bureau of Forensic
Services (UBFS) application for the FY20 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The state’s
Application includes $19,500 for the police department’s Crime Laboratory to attain initial accreditation in 2021
through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO 17020 for Inspection Agencies.
The Police Department received a subaward from UBFS’s FY19 Coverdell application to fund the application fee.
The anticipated remaining accreditation costs, which will be funded through this FY20 award, include the
assessment fee and the annual accreditation fee based on the laboratory’s scope of operations.
A match is not required for this award.
Section I: Council Added Items
(None)
ATTACHMENTS
1. County Auditor Letter on Convention Hotel 2020 Tax Increment Diversion
2. Salt Laker Card Budget Update through March 2021
ACRONYMS
CARES Act – Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
CATNIP Fund – (formerly) County Active Transportation Fund
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
CIT – Crisis Intervention Team
ERPL – Emergency Response Pandemic Leave
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency
FOF – Funding Our Future
FY – Fiscal Year
GF – General Fund
MRT – Medical Response Team
OT – Overtime
PSB – Public Safety Building
RDA – Redevelopment Agency
UBFS – Utah Department of Public Safety’s Bureau of Forensic Services
USAR – Utah Search and Rescue
SCOTT TINGLEY
CIA, CGAP
Salt Lake County Auditor
STingley@slco.org
CHERYLANN JOHNSON
MBA, CIA, CFE
Chief Deputy Auditor
CAJohnson@slco.org
ROSWELL ROGERS
Senior Advisor
RRogers@slco.org
STUART TSAI
JD, MPA
Property Tax
Division Administrator
STsai@slco.org
SHAWNA AHLBORN
Audit Services
Division Administrator
SAhlborn@slco.org
OFFICE OF THE
SALT LAKE COUNTY
AUDITOR
2001 S State Street, N3-300
PO Box 144575
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4575
(385) 468-7200; TTY 711
1-866-498-4955 / fax
March 29, 2021
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Danny Walz
Chief Operating Officer
451 South State St, Room 418
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Dear Danny Walz,
Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 63N-2-508 of the “New Convention Facility Development
Incentives,” Salt Lake County shall retain incremental property tax revenue (IPTR) for tax
year 2020. This reduces any tax increment financing that otherwise would have been
paid to the host agency. Incremental value and revenue from an increase in the taxable
value of hotel property are used as adjustments in the certified tax rate calculation
pursuant to UCA § 59-2-924.
For transparency of the use of taxpayer monies and to assist you with your budget
preparation, our office is providing you with IPTR information.
If you have questions on IPTR, please contact Greg Folta in the Salt Lake County Mayor’s
Office of Financial Administration at (385) 468-7076, or gfolta@slco.org.
Sincerely,
Scott Tingley, CIA, CGAP
Salt Lake County Auditor
Enclosures
INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE - CONVENTION HOTEL TAX YEAR 2020
ENTITY
Incremental
Property Tax
Revenue
Central Utah Water Conservancy 1,143
County Assessing & Collecting Levy 600
Metropolitan Water District Of Salt Lake & Sandy (Slc) 757
Multi County Assessing & Collecting Levy 34
Salt Lake City 10,116
Salt Lake City Library 1,952
Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement 349
Salt Lake City School 9,538
Salt Lake County Bond Interest & Sinking Fund 660
Salt Lake County Capital Improvement 206
Salt Lake County Clark Planetarium 74
Salt Lake County Flood Control 166
Salt Lake County General Fund 4,021
Salt Lake County Government Immunity 43
Salt Lake County Health Department 397
State Basic School Levy - Salt Lake City 4,652
Utah Charter School - Salt Lake City 231
Grand Total 34,939
Office of the Salt Lake County Auditor 3/25/2021
Income Statement 8/1/2020-3/31/2021
Fund: Salt Lake City Equity Fund
Type Account Total Notes
Revenue
Support
Donation from Salt Lake City Corporation (CARES) 1,401,264.00
Donation from Salt Lake City Corporation 25,000.00
Donation from Salt Lake City Corporation (Muslim League) 50,000.00
Donation from Salt Lake County 25,000.00
Individual/Foundation contributions (checks, Stripe) 103,184.68
Total Revenue $1,604,448.68
Expenses
Expense
Raise UP SLC Distribution 849,000.00
Utah Community Action 283,000.00 Card funds
Comunidades Unidas 283,000.00 Card funds
University Neighborhood Partners 283,000.00 Card funds
Raise Up SLC Admin Grant 14,865.00
Utah Community Action 5,000.00
Comunidades Unidas 9,865.00
Accounts Payable 17,064.31
Love Communication 15,006.00 Initiative promotion
Goodworld 1,148.31 Donation portal management
Inlingua Utah 910.00 Translation services
Bank/CC Fees 272.03
Community Foundation of Utah Admin Fee Expense 42,962.85
Total Expenses $924,164.19
Change in Net Assets $680,284.49
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: ________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 20, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment # 9
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2020 – 21 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $ 439,809.00 $ 830,467.64
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 8,751,135.00 8,798,117.37
DEBT SERVICE FUND 78,291.00 0.00
DONATION FUND 200,000.00 200,000.00
REFUSE FUND 46,982.37 0.00
E911 FUND 0.00 41,138.00
MISCELLANEOUS GRANT FUND 169,500.00 169,500.00
TOTAL $ 9,685,717.37 $ 10,039,223.01
Lisa Shaffer (Apr 20, 2021 17:34 MDT)
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2019-20 Budget Adjustments
The Fiscal Year 2021 projections are coming in below budgeted revenues. The following chart
shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2021.
FY20-21 Variance
Annual Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Property Taxes 111,418,455 111,418,455 -
Sales and Use Tax 67,999,593 69,146,260 1,146,667
Franchise Tax 26,812,125 26,702,018 (110,107)
PILOT Taxes 1,508,894 1,508,894 -
TOTAL TAXES 207,739,067 208,775,627 1,036,560
License and Permits 28,601,482 30,071,777 1,470,295
Intergovernmental 4,444,400 4,146,157 (298,243)
Interest Income 1,900,682 1,700,000 (200,682)
Fines & Forfeiture 3,938,848 2,210,747 (1,728,101)
Parking Meter Collection 3,432,962 1,705,187 (1,727,775)
Charges and Services 4,428,069 4,219,771 (208,298)
Miscellaneous Revenue 4,014,037 3,036,282 (977,755)
Interfund Reimbursement 20,281,706 20,268,706 (13,000)
Transfers 9,507,812 9,507,812 -
TOTAL W/OUT SPECIAL TAX 288,289,065 285,642,067 (2,646,998)
Sales and Use Tax - 1/2 cent 32,797,506 33,547,506 750,000
Sales and Use Tax - County
Option - - -
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 321,086,571 319,189,573 (1,896,998)
The City is currently projecting a $1.9 million decrease in budgeted revenue. The largest portion
of the decrease is attributed to a $1.7 million decrease in Fines and Forfeitures, a $1.7 million
decrease in Parking Meter Revenues and a $978 thousand decrease in Miscellaneous
Revenues. These decreases are offset by a projected net increase of $1.4 million in Licenses and
Permits as well as a $1.1 million increase in Sales Tax and a $750 thousand increase in sales tax
attributable to Funding Our Future revenues.
The increase in Licenses and Permits is in spite of airport parking/license tax showing a
decrease due to decreased travel as a result of COVID. The decrease in airport parking and
licenses is $2,045,000. Innkeepers tax has also been hit hard by COVID and is projecting a
decrease of $1,717,500. According to the local news, hotels are experiencing 30% occupancy
compared to this time of year in previous years. Business license are also expected to be below
budget due to trends for apartment units, new business license and renew business licenses.
These losses are offset by gains in permits & zoning building permits (+$1.1M), plan check fees
(+$1.5M), and street excavation (+$1.96M due to a temporary boost from Google contract).
Fines and Forfeitures are projected below budget due to a decrease in parking ticket revenue of
$750k. Justice Court fines are down $185k, while moving violations are projected wat a loss of
$699k. The Justice Court is following the order of the Administrative Office of the Courts which
is resulting in fewer court cases and no orders to pay fines, which are then subsequently not sent
to collections and no warrants are being issued. Traffic school revenue is down $61k and vehicle
booting is projected to be down $19k.
Parking Meter Collection is slightly less than half of the previous fiscal year due to an overall
decrease in traffic downtown. This is driving the significant decrease of $1.7 million.
Additionally, Miscellaneous Revenue has also been affected by the pandemic with decreases in
accounts receivable collections, special event revenue, fuel reimbursement due to the Mayor’s
emergency declaration and utility reimbursement.
Given the available information fund balance would be projected as follows:
With the current use of fund balance from this budget amendment fund balance drops to 15.09%.
2019 Actual FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL
Beginning Fund Balance 56,104,269 10,372,054 69,441,955 79,814,009 6,625,050 82,617,126 89,242,176
Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (380,025) - (1,510,094) (1,510,094) 2,924,682 (7,810,302) (4,885,620)
Prior Year Encumbrances (8,731,774) (3,105,004) (6,566,830) (9,671,834) (3,733,743) (6,165,453) (9,899,196)
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 46,992,470 7,267,050 61,365,031 68,632,081 5,815,989 68,641,371 74,457,360
Beginning Fund Balance Percent 14.57%18.17%20.64%20.35%17.34%23.66%23.00%
Year End CAFR Adjustments
Revenue Changes - - - - - - -
Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,701,982) - (4,127,838) (4,127,838) - (5,676,583) (5,676,583)
Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 43,290,488 7,267,050 57,237,193 64,504,243 5,815,989 62,964,788 68,780,777
Final Fund Balance Percent 13.42%18.17%19.26%19.13%17.34%21.70%21.25%
Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (1,858,647) (2,300,000) (13,070,734) (15,370,734)
BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - -
BA#1 Expense Adjustment - - -
BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - - -
BA#2 Expense Adjustment - (288,488) (288,488)
BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - -
BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (6,239,940) (6,239,940)
BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - -
BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - -
BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - (242,788) (242,788)
BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (2,783,685) (2,783,685)
BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - - -
BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (63,673) (63,673)
BA#7 Revenue Adjustment - 540,744 540,744
BA#7 Expense Adjustment - (6,582,824) (6,582,824)
BA#8 Revenue Adjustment - - -
BA#8 Expense Adjustment (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (2,000,000)
BA#9 Revenue Adjustment - 439,809 439,809
BA#9 Expense Adjustment - (830,468) (830,468)
Change in Revenue 3,149,980 758,000 6,069,370 6,827,370 750,000 (2,646,998) (1,896,998)
Fund Balance Budgeted Increase 2,500,000 900,000 - 900,000 - - -
- Adjusted Fund Balance 47,081,821 6,625,050 50,235,829 56,860,879 5,565,989 43,266,477 48,832,466
Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 14.60%16.56%16.90%16.86%16.59%14.91%15.09%
Projected Revenue 322,562,293 40,000,000 297,251,407 337,251,407 33,547,506 290,132,520 323,680,026
2021 Projection2020 Projection
Fund Balance Projections
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $9,685,717.37 of revenue and
expense of $10,039,223.01. The amendment proposes changes in the seven funds, with
$390,658.64 from the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes twenty-one initiatives
for Council review.
A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The
Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
Ninth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-2021)
An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 27 of 2020 which adopted the
Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2020 and Ending
June 30, 2021.
In June of 2020, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2020 and ending June 30, 2021, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 27 of 2020.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes
2
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2021.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2021.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
_________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or
One-time FTEs
1 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
2 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
3 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
4 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
5 Inland Port Property Tax Revenue GF 483,242.00 - One-time -
5 Inland Port Property Tax Revenue GF (483,242.00) - One-time -
6 Convention Hotel Property Tax Revenue GF 10,116.00 - One-time -
6 Convention Hotel Property Tax Revenue GF (10,116.00) - One-time -
7 Presumption for CARES GF - (293,067.36)One-time -
7 Presumption for CARES Non-Departmental GF (143,067.36)One-time
7 Presumption fo CARES Fire Change from
Non-Departmental
GF 143,067.36
8 Fire Emergency Management Office
Buildout
GF 150,000.00 150,000.00 One-time -
9 911-ETM Security Platform E911 - 41,138.00 One-time -
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section A: New Items
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
1
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or
One-time FTEs
1 Police Impact Fee Refund CIP - (510,828.00)One-time -
1 Police Impact Fee Refund CIP - 438,897.00 One-time -
1 Police Impact Fee Refund CIP - 71,931.00 One-time -
2 Move Transportation CIP Projects to CIP
Fund
Transportation - (8,695,770.00)One-time -
2 Move Transportation CIP Projects to CIP
Fund
Transportation - 8,695,770.00 One-time -
2 Move Transportation CIP Projects to CIP
Fund
CIP 8,695,770.00 8,695,770.00 One-time -
3 Transfer CIP Funds to Refuse Fund CIP - 46,982.37 One-time -
3 Transfer CIP Funds to Refuse Fund Refuse 46,982.37 - One-time -
4 Transfer Bond Funds from 700 West Cost
Center to Bond Contingency
CIP - (917,854.00)One-time -
4 Transfer Bond Funds from 700 West Cost
Center to Bond Contingency
CIP - 917,854.00 One-time -
5 Corrections for Debt Transfer Errors in
Original Adopted Budget
GF - 78,291.00 One-time -
5 Corrections for Debt Transfer Errors in
Original Adopted Budget
Debt Service 78,291.00 - One-time -
6 Donation Fund Increase Donation 200,000.00 200,000.00 One-time -
7 Fire Department - Wildland/Search &
Rescue Deployments
GF 230,683.00 230,683.00 One-time -
8 Fire Department - Other Reimbursements GF 59,126.00 59,126.00 One-time -
9 Fire Department - COVID Costs GF - 605,435.00 One-time -
1 Salt Lake County, CATNIP, Reconfigure
Gilmer Drive
CIP 55,365.00 55,365.00 One-time -
2 CARES Act, third tranche Misc Grants 150,000.00 150,000.00 One-time
-
Council Approved
Section D: Housekeeping
Section F: Donations
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Administration Proposed
2
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or
One-time FTEs
Consent Agenda #5
1 Utah State Dept. of Public Safety, Bureau of
Forensic Services, FY 20 Paul Coverdell Forensic
Science Improvement Grant Program
Misc Grants 19,500.00 19,500.00 One-time -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 9,685,717.37 10,039,223.01 - - -
Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #9:
General Fund GF 439,809.00 830,467.64 - - -
Capital Improvement Program Fund CIP 8,751,135.00 8,798,117.37 - - -
Debt Service Fund Debt Service 78,291.00 - - - -
Donation Fund Donation 200,000.00 200,000.00 - - -
Refuse Fund Refuse 46,982.37 - - - -
E 911 Fund E911 - 41,138.00 - - -
Miscellaneous Grants Fund Misc Grants 169,500.00 169,500.00 - - -
- - -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 9,685,717.37 10,039,223.01 - - -
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Section I: Council Added Items
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
3
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2020-21 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
FY 2020-21
Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total
^^ Total Through
BA#5 ^^
General Fund (FC 10)326,130,003 288,487.58 6,184,940.00 2,783,685.00 335,387,115.58
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,763,746 1,763,746.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000.00
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,379,697 1,500.00 5,381,197.00
Water Fund (FC 51)126,333,193 296,750.00 126,629,943.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)212,638,399 108,500.00 212,746,899.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)17,961,860 32,650.00 17,994,510.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)302,311,600 - 520,000.00 38,956,452.00 341,788,052.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)16,515,438 53,200.00 2,742,500.00 19,311,138.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)8,484,897 8,484,897.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,789,270 3,789,270.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)19,209,271 93,000.00 19,302,271.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)18,289,687 237,000.00 18,526,687.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)
7,571,945 7,571,945.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)3,509,164 3,063,849.00 6,573,013.00
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,261,044 716,764.00 5,925,738.42 5,925,738.00 7,818,505.00 28,647,789.42
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)- -
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,380,172 2,380,172.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)23,248,016 23,248,016.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)37,519,401 (3,858,955.00) 33,660,446.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)24,420,242 36,435,000.00 60,855,242.00
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,855,203 2,855,203.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)51,409,025 14,350.00 51,423,375.00
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,221,534,273 716,764.00 7,463,826.00 45,141,392.00 5,925,738.00 49,091,934.00 1,329,873,927.00
4
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2020-21 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
^^ FY 2020-21
Adopted Budget
through BA#5
^^ BA #6 Total BA #7 Total BA #8 Total BA #9 Total Total To-Date
General Fund (FC 10)335,387,116 63,673.00 6,582,824.00 2,000,000.00 830,467.64 344,864,080
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,763,746 1,763,746
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,381,197 5,038.00 5,386,235
Water Fund (FC 51)126,629,943 1,543,238.00 128,173,181
Sewer Fund (FC 52)212,746,899 241,206.00 212,988,105
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)17,994,510 67,282.00 18,061,792
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)341,788,052 859,674.00 342,647,726
Refuse Fund (FC 57)19,311,138 128,084.00 19,439,222
Golf Fund (FC 59)8,484,897 23,667.00 8,508,564
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,789,270 41,138.00 3,830,408
Fleet Fund (FC 61)19,302,271 97,612.00 19,399,883
IMS Fund (FC 65)18,526,687 453,399.00 93,766.00 19,073,852
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)
7,571,945 1,876.00 7,573,821
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)6,573,013 6,573,013
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)28,647,789 750,000.00 11,223,292.00 169,500.00 40,790,581
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)- 520,150.00 520,150
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,380,172 200,000.00 2,580,172
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)23,248,016 - 23,248,016
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)33,660,446 33,660,446
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)60,855,242 1,293,732.00 1,361,866.14 8,798,117.37 72,308,958
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,855,203 5,296.00 2,860,499
Risk Fund (FC 87)51,423,375 3,836.00 51,427,211
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,329,873,927 2,560,804.00 22,758,707.14 2,000,000.00 10,039,223.01 - 1,367,232,661
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
5
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Contingent Appropriation
6
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-2: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-3: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-4: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-5: Inland Port Tax Revenue GF $0.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
As part of the City's annual financial audit, the City was informed it needs to budget and account for City tax revenue withi n
the boundaries of the Inland Port. Because the tax revenue is dispersed directly to the inland port, the City does not receive
the tax revenue. The City will budget a line item to recognize the tax revenue and a corresponding contra account so City
revenue is not overstated. A $500,000 portion of the Inland Port revenue was accounted for in budget amendment #7 of
this fiscal year. This amendment will account for the remaining $483,242 in anticipated revenue.
A-6: Convention Hotel Tax Revenue GF $0.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
As part of the City's annual financial audit, the City was informed it needs to budget and account for City tax revenue at the
Convention Center Hotel. Because the tax revenue is dispersed directly to the convention hotel, the City does not receive
the tax revenue. The City will budget a line item to recognize the tax revenue and a corresponding contra account so City
revenue is not overstated. This amendment is for the $10,116 in anticipated revenue.
A-7: Presumption for CARES GF -$293,067.36
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk
The Council approved the use of the assumption for any unspent funds from CARES. This amendment recognizes the
removes personnel expenses in Fire that were used for the assumption and passes the eligible budget from previously
budgeted line items to Fire.
A-8: Fire Emergency Management Office Buildout
GF $293,067.36
Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson/
Clint Rasmussen
The Administration is proposing to use the third traunche of CARES Act funding ($150,000) and the remaining unspent
amounts from the first two traunches ($143,067.36) to build office space for Emergency Management within the Fire
Department. Emergency Management is growing and is currently limited in office space. The current staff reside on the
3rd floor of the PSB, many in spaces designed as common space or break-out rooms. Adjacent to this area, is open floor
space that can be converted to office space. This would include 2 new Division Chief offices, 2 new Captain offices, plus
cubicle space and open space. Construction budget is estimated at $275,000 plus furniture requirements of $42,000. Fire
Department funds will be used to complete any additional costs not covered in this amendment.
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
A-9: 911-ETM Security Platform E911 $41,138.00
Department: E911 Communications Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen
SLC911 has seen an unprecedented surge of digital attacks on their 911 and administrative lines. The result has been a
telephone denial of service attack (TDoS) which means that a series of calls spoof incoming lines by merging other public
safety answering points together, or robo calling which overwhelms lines for service. While we have been fortunate to date,
we are seeing this behavior more frequently. Without this protection, our communities are at risk and it would have a
devastating impact on the ability of the center to answer emergency calls. SLC911 is requesting emergency funding to
purchase an enterprise voice network security platform. This platform includes hardware, software, and monitoring
services. The managed services will monitor 911's administrative systems for threats and respond with specific
recommendations to mitigate any attacks. This funding is requested to come from Fund 60, the E911 Tax Fund, not the
General Fund.
Hardware $9,685
Licensing $2,878
Installation/Training $3,375
Monitoring Services $25,200
Total Requested $41,138
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Police Impact Fee Refund Impact Fees -$510,828.00
Impact Fees $510,828.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: John Vuyk / Mike Atkinson
The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property using Police Impact Fees. The intended property did not
work for the police precinct and refunds of the impact fees are now required. These refunds will be funded with proceeds
from unclaimed refunds from Cost Center 8417006. The remaining funds in 8417006 will be returned to 8484001.
D-2: Moving Transportation CIP Projects to CIP Fund Trans -$8,695,770.00
Trans $8,695,770.00
CIP $8,695,770.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson
Currently the Transportation CIP projects reside in the Transportation fund. Because the fund is a governmental fund,
assets will need to be carefully evaluated, capitalized, depreciated and reported like the regular CIP funds. This is a time
intensive project and one of the biggest bottle necks for the financial audit. To relieve some of this pressure, we request
that the Transportation capital projects be moved to the CIP fund so they can be processed like the other CIP funds. The
funds will be easily identifiable as being funded by the Transportation sales tax. No additional funding is required as this
just moves the funds from the Transportation Fund to the CIP Fund.
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
D-3: Transfer CIP Funds to Refuse Fund CIP $46,982.37
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Gregg Evans
The Department of Sustainability is requesting a budget amendment to transfer $46,982 from CIP to the Envi ronment and
Energy Fund 00577 within the Refuse Fund Class 57. During FY19 the Department of Sustainability transferred $240,000
to CIP (CC 8320715) to be used in conjunction with an RMP Bluesky grant toward installing rooftop solar on the Sorenson
Unity Center building. The Sorenson Rooftop Solar Project is now finished, and the department is requesting that the
remaining unused funds of $46,982 be transferred back into the Environment and Energy Fund (E&E) within the Refuse
Fund Class 57.
Due to the shrinking E&E fund balance these funds are greatly needed and will be used to fund future sustainability
projects and operations.
D-4: Transfer Bond Funds from 700 West Cost Center to Bond
Contingency
CIP -$917,854.00
CIP $917,854.00
Department: Community & Neighborhoods Prepared By: John Vuyk
The budgetary estimate of construction costs for the 700 West Road Re-Construction Bond project was $2,000,000. 10%
of these funds were assigned to the 2020 Bond Contingency Fund. The 700 West Cost Center was, therefore, $1,800,000.
700 West was also eligible for $155,000 of Impact Fees. The bids for 700 West came in well below the budgeted amount.
With the completion of construction and the application of Impact Fees, the 700 West project is $917,853.80 below the
budgeted amount. This includes the hard and soft costs.
These funds are being requested to be moved to one of the 2020 or 2021 contingency fu nds so the bond funds can be
expended on upcoming bond road projects.
D-5: Corrections for Debt Transfer Errors in Original Adopted
Budget
GF $78,291.00
Debt Service $78,291.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Russ Sundquist
During the chaos of the COVID pandemic, the estimated savings from existing cash in the debt service fund of $22,892
(see CIP book page A6) were subtracted twice. It is necessary to add additional budget to cover sales tax bonds.
Additionally, the City also expected to realize savings from refunding the ESCO debt of $55,399 (see Budget Book page
B21). As the bonds were evaluated in preparation for the refunding, there was not the estimated savings that were
expected. The total amount needed is $78,291.
D-6: Donation Fund Increase Donation $200,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Teresa Beckstrand
There is a strong possibility that before the year-end we will receive several large donations that will exceed the amount
approved in the annual budget. It is necessary to have enough budget to accommodate all the donations and be under
budget by the end of the fiscal year and be in compliance for the audit. As of December 30th, 2020 there were
approximately $80,000 in donations. If the expected donations are received, we will need approximately $200,000 in
budget. All donations are processed as required through the donation ordinance and will be reported in detail to Council
after the end of the year.
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
4
D-7: Fire Department – Wildland/Search & Rescue Deployments GF $230,683.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen
Personnel were deployed several times during Fall 2020. A team was mobilized to Hurricane Laura in August, a Search &
Rescue team assisted in Oregon in September while simultaneously another team volunteered to fight their Wildfires. The
department helped fight the California Wildfires in October. Finally, crews assisted in Utah County on the Ridge Fire. All
costs associated with these deployments will be reimbursed to Salt Lake City. We are asking the City Council to approve
this request to offset personnel costs that include overtime, benefits, and backfill. This proposal will make the fire
department whole as well as the General Fund with offsetting revenues. The request is only for the amount of revenues we
have received.
Expense
Hurricane Laura - August 2020 $ 87,572.01
Oregon Wildfire Search & Rescue - September 2020 $234,201.93
Oregon Wildfire - September 2020 $243,468.67
California Wildfire - October 2020 $ 176,218.51
Utah County Ridge Fire - October 2020 $ 3,666.00
Total Expense Incurred $745,127.12
Revenue/Reimbursement Received
Hurricane Laura $ 59,328.56 2/24/2021
Oregon Search & Rescue $167,688.39 2/24/2021
Utah County Ridge Fire $ 3,666.00 3/2/2021
Reimbursement Rec'd $230,682.95
Remainder of Reimbursement will likely be received in FY22 and will be included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget as
a one-time revenue and expense line item.
D-8: Fire Department – Other Reimbursements GF $59,126.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen
The Fire Department has provided several services in which it expects to receive a reimbursement including: Fire Inspector
overtime on behalf of the SLC Airport Redevelopment contractor, backfill costs caused by Utah Search and Rescue training
at their request, Fire Watch services for the Vice Presidential Debate at the University of Utah, and finally cost recovery
efforts from negligent accidents/incidents.
Airport Redevelopment Inspector OT $ 7,671.50
Utah Search and Rescue (USAR) Training/Backfill $19,006.05
Cost Recovery $28,811.15
Vice Presidential Debate Fire Watch/Standby $ 3,637.45
Budget Amendment Total $59,126.15
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
5
D-9: Fire Department COVID Costs GF $605,435.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Clint Rasmussen
COVID19 ERPL and Worker's Compensation claims caused by COVID19 have had a detrimental effect to the Fire
Department's budget. While ERPL was very much appreciated by Fire personnel, it caused a dramatic rise in the cost of
backfilling open shifts. The Fire Department has a 4-handed staffing mandate, meaning each apparatus will have 4
personnel and the department will "buy back" off duty personnel to fill any gaps. Many times, this cost is paid out at
overtime. When Emergency Responders tested positive for COVID19, it was a presumptive positive, meaning it was
assumed the infection was obtained while working on the job in their role for Salt Lake City. It is anticipated that some of
these costs will eventually be reimbursed by FEMA.
This request is for Worker's Compensation claims directly caused by COVID19, and ERPL associated backfill costs
(Buybacks, Fullstaffs, OT, MRT OT).
WC Claims $155,295
ERPL Backfill $450,140
Total $605,435
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
E-1: Salt Lake County, CATNIP, Reconfigure Gilmer Drive CIP $55,365.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond
The Transportation Division received a follow up grant award from Salt Lake County for $55,365 to finish up
the original 9 Line / 900 South Trail. The Gilmer Drive Intersection was not completed during the original
contract period so the funds were unspent.
The County issued a new Interlocal Agreement with the City to finish the project funding from the original
Agreement. This funding is to reconfigure the Gilmer Drive Intersection; move and curb, add a landscaped
separation between bikeway and roadway and install wayfinding signage.
In FY18 The Transportation Division applied for and received a grant from Salt Lake County for $500,000
under the Countywide Active Transportation Network Improvement Program 2017. This grant is to be used for
design and construction of the segment of the 9 Line / 900 South Trail between 900 East and 1300 East.
Construction of the trail segment would occur in conjunction with road reconstruction from Lincoln (950 East)
to 1300 East and the installation of wayfinding signs on 900 South and Gilmer Drive.
This grant has a no match requirement.
A public hearing was held on 12/12/17 on the original grant application for this award.
E-2: CARES Act, third tranche Grant $150,000.00
Department: Finance Prepared By: Melyn Osmond
Salt Lake City received $150,000 from the third tranche of CARES Act funding. In BA#4 the Council authorized
the Administration to use the presumption that any amount received in this tranche would cover costs
associated with expenses within the Fire Department. This amendment formalizes that assumption, with the
City recognizing the revenue and an expense associated with the award.
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #9
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
6
The County issued a new Interlocal Agreement with the City to finish the project funding from the original
Agreement. This funding is to reconfigure the Gilmer Drive Intersection; move and curb, add a landscaped
separation between bikeway and roadway and install wayfinding signage.
In FY18 The Transportation Division applied for and received a grant from Salt Lake County for $500,000
under the Countywide Active Transportation Network Improvement Program 2017. This grant is to be used for
design and construction of the segment of the 9 Line / 900 South Trail between 900 East and 1300 East.
Construction of the trail segment would occur in conjunction with road reconstruction from Lincoln (950 East)
to 1300 East and the installation of wayfinding signs on 900 South and Gilmer Drive.
This grant has a no match requirement.
A public hearing was held on 12/12/17 on the original grant application for this award.
Section F: Donations
Section G: Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda #5
G-1: Utah State Dept. of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services,
FY 20 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant
Program
Misc Grants $19,500.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Jordan Smith / Melyn Osmond
The police department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety’s Bureau of Forensic Services
(UBFS) application for the FY20 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The state’s application
includes $19,500 for the police department’s Crime Laboratory to attain initial accreditation in 2021 through ANAB (ANSI
National Accreditation Board) under ISO 17020 for Inspection Agencies.
The Police Department received a subaward from UBFS’s FY19 Coverdell application to fund the application fee. The
anticipated remaining accreditation costs, which will be funded through this FY20 award, include the assessment fee and
the annual accreditation fee based on the laboratory’s scope of operations.
A match is not required for this award.
Section I: Council Added Items
Impact Fees ‐ Summary Confidential
Data pulled 4/01/2021
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 395,285$ A
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 930,142$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 7,097,114$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 5,013,594$ D
13,436,135$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202007 (Jul2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202008 (Aug2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202009 (Sep2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202010 (Oct2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202011 (Nov2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202012 (Dec2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202101 (Jan2021)2021Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202102 (Feb2021)2021Q3 16,273$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 16,273$
202103 (Mar2021)2021Q3 16,105$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 16,105$ Current Month
202104 (Apr2021)2021Q4 1,718$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 1,718$
202105 (May2021)2021Q4 14,542$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 14,542$
202106 (Jun2021)2021Q4 30,017$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 30,017$
202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 10,107$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 10,107$
202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 6,804$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 6,804$
202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 5,554$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 5,554$
202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 3,106$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 3,106$
202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202201 (Jan2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202202 (Feb2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202203 (Mar2022)2022Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202204 (Apr2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202205 (May2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202206 (Jun2022)2022Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 118$ -$ -$ -$ 118$
202305 (May2023)2023Q4 469$ -$ -$ -$ 469$
202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 276$ -$ -$ -$ 276$
Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 78,656$ -$ -$ -$ 78,656$
Notes
^1
FY
2
0
2
3
Calendar
Month
1/26/21: We are currently in a refund situation. We will refund $104k in the next 9 months without offsetting expenditures
Fi
s
c
a
l
Y
e
a
r
2
0
2
1
FY
2
0
2
2
Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 4/01/2021 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Crime lab rent 8417001 -$ 118$ -$ (118)$
Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$
Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$
Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$ A
Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 5,520$ 3,507$ 1,955$ 58$
Police Refunds 8418013 539,687$ -$ 69,291$ 470,396$
Police impact fee refunds 8417006 510,828$ -$ -$ 510,828$
PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 1,410,243$ 239,836$ -$ 1,170,407$
Grand Total 2,512,316$ 289,499$ 71,246$ 2,151,572$
Fire
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,831$
Fire Station #14 8415001 6,650$ 6,083$ 567$ -$
Fire Station #14 8416006 52,040$ -$ 7,428$ 44,612$
Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568$
Fire Station #3 8416009 1,050$ 96$ 485$ 469$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$ B
Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$
FireTrainingCenter 8419012 46,550$ -$ 46,550$ -$
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 10,965$ 6,966$ 3,941$ 58$
FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 66,546$ -$ 10,516$ 56,031$
Fire Station #3 Debt Service 8421200 541,106$ -$ 541,106$ -$
Grand Total 1,164,177$ 13,145$ 949,764$ 201,268$
Parks
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Three Creeks Confluence 8419101 173,017$ 39,697$ 133,320$ -$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 7,643$ 6,388$ 1,213$ 42$
337 Community Garden, 337 S 40 8416002 277$ -$ -$ 277$
Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 766$ -$ 470$ 296$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 24,056$ 23,000$ 270$ 786$ C
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 16,087$ -$ 14,977$ 1,110$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 11,856$ -$ 10,287$ 1,570$
9line park 8416005 86,322$ 20,952$ 63,114$ 2,256$
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 50,356$ 43,597$ 605$ 6,155$
Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ -$ 7,500$
FY Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 27,478$ 4,328$ 14,683$ 8,467$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 15,939$ -$ 6,589$ 9,350$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$
Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796$
Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 27,000$ -$ 6,589$ 20,411$
JR Boat Ram 8420144 125,605$ 16,546$ 49,104$ 59,956$
Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 515,245$ 407,516$ 37,648$ 70,081$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 350,000$ -$ 257,265$ 92,736$
Parks Impact Fees 8418015 102,256$ -$ -$ 102,256$
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 200,000$ 35,506$ 51,934$ 112,560$
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 727,000$ 571,809$ 4,080$ 151,111$
9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ -$ -$ 195,045$
Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 225,000$ -$ -$ 225,000$
Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 350,250$ 12,980$ 54,332$ 282,939$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ 979$ -$ 326,699$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 490,830$ -$ -$ 490,830$
Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 540,732$ -$ -$ 540,732$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,145,394$ 46,474$ 33,569$ 1,065,351$
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ -$ -$ 1,098,764$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,442,199$ 274,321$ 46,898$ 3,120,981$
Grand Total 11,415,868$ 1,504,094$ 786,943$ 9,124,831$
Streets
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$
IF Roundabout 2000 E Parleys 8420122 455,000$ -$ 455,000$ -$
500 to 700 S 8418016 575,000$ 96,637$ 478,363$ -$
LifeOnState Imp Fee 8419009 124,605$ -$ 124,605$ -$
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$
700 South Reconstruction 8414001 310,032$ -$ 310,032$ -$
700 South Reconstruction 8415004 1,157,506$ 2,449$ 1,155,057$ -$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ D
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 22,360$ -$ 20,821$ 1,539$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,544$ 13,865$ 435$ 2,244$
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 39,176$ 17,442$ 9,360$ 12,374$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ -$ -$ 13,000$
500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 41,027$ 21,799$ 3,319$ 15,909$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 250,000$ 142,326$ 69,591$ 38,083$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 125,000$ 6,020$ 61,182$ 57,798$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 210,752$ 69,002$ 56,815$ 84,935$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Transportation Safety Imp 8418007 147,912$ 1,264$ 8,990$ 137,658$
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ -$ -$ 152,500$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 375,000$ 72,947$ -$ 302,053$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 251,316$ -$ 15,688$ 235,628$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ -$ -$ 875,000$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,858,090$ -$ 607,870$ 2,250,220$
Grand Total 9,292,247$ 443,752$ 3,377,127$ 5,471,368$
Total 24,384,609$ 2,250,490$ 5,185,080$ 16,949,039$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
7,097,114$
5,013,594$
13,436,135$
8484002
8484003
8484005
395,285$
$930,142
8484001
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022,
the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal
Employees Local 1004, representing eligible employees)
An ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the
provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated effective June 28, 2020 between Salt
Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
Local 1004, representing eligible employees.
PREAMBLE
The City Council, in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ______ of 2020, approved a
Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American
Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, as the certified bargaining
representative for eligible employees. The Memorandum of Understanding is a three-year
agreement. The Memorandum of Understanding is subject to appropriation of funds by the City
Council. The City Council, therefore, wishes to appropriate funds to implement the provisions
of the Memorandum of Understanding, as negotiated by the City and the American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, for fiscal year 2022.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to appropriate necessary
funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
approved by the City Council in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ____ of 2020 between Salt Lake
City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local
1004.
2
SECTION 2. APPROPRIATION. The City Council hereby appropriates necessary
funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and
Municipal Employees Local 1004, as approved by the City Council in Salt Lake City Ordinance
No. _____ of 2020.
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION. The Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby
authorized to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal
Employees Local 1004.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July
___, 2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of June, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
By:_______________________
Jonathan Pappasideris
Jonathan Pappasideris
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022,
the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal
Employees Local 1004 (“AFSCME”)
PREAMBLE
In 2020, the City Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake
City Corporation and AFSCME, as the certified bargaining representative for eligible employees.
The Memorandum of Understanding is a three-year agreement and the wage schedule is subject
to an annual appropriation of funds by the City Council. The City Council, therefore, wishes to
appropriate funds to implement the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding, as
negotiated by the City and AFSCME.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND APPROPRIATION. The purpose of this ordinance is to
appropriate necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the wage schedule and any other
appropriations contemplated by the Memorandum of Understanding approved by the City
Council in 2020 between Salt Lake City Corporation and AFSCME. The wage schedule for
fiscal year 2022 is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION 2. AUTHORIZATION. Upon AFSCME’s ratification of the attached wage
schedule, the Mayor of Salt Lake City Corporation is hereby is authorized to implement the wage
schedule and any other appropriations contemplated in the Memorandum of Understanding.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July
___, 2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of June, 2021.
2
______________________________
Amy Fowler, Council Chair
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
______________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Katherine Lewis
3
EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE
[Attach wage schedule]
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
June 27, 2021 – June 24, 2022
WAGES
Salt Lake City Corporation
and the
American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal Employees
Local 1004, AFL-CIO
AFSCME
Jerry Philpot, President
Website: www.afscmeutah.org
E-mail: jerry.philpot@slcgov.com
Salt Lake City Corporation
Website: www.slcgov.com
Intranet: http://slcnet
Office: 801.535.7900
This amendment replaces Article 12, Article 13, and Appendix A of the existing MOU
with all other provisions remaining in full force and effect:
ARTICLE 12- WAGE SCHEDULE
For the period from June 27, 2021, to June 24, 2022, the City and AFSCME agree that
eligible employees will be paid as provided for herein.
Wage Schedule
Subject to Article 13, the City agrees that, from June 27, 2021, to June 24, 2022, it will pay
eligible employees the amounts outlined in the Wage Schedule attached as Exhibit “A.”
The City and AFSCME agree that there will be a limited reopener of this MOU for the
exclusive purpose of negotiating the wage schedules for subsequent fiscal years covered by
this MOU.
ARTICLE 13- MERIT AND PAY INCREASES
100 Series and 200 Series Eligible Employees
For June 28, 2021 to June 24, 2022, the City and AFSCME agree that each 100 series, 200
series, and 330 series eligible employees will be paid biweekly in accordance with the wage
schedule as set forth in Appendix "A" of this MOU. Eligible employee pay rates shall be
based on "completed years of service," which shall be the number of calendar years the
eligible employee has completed in their assigned job title.
General Provisions
"Completed years of service" shall be calculated to be the number of calendar years the
eligible employee has completed in the job title. "Job title" shall mean the specific job title,
including levels of a career ladder (i.e. "Office Facilitator I" or "Office Facilitator II" or
"Sanitation Operator II").
An eligible employee may move to a higher pay rate during the effective dates of the wage
schedule provided for in this Article in the event that the passage of the eligible employee's
anniversary date results in the employee completing the requisite number of completed years
of service.
For newly hired eligible employees or to facilitate the movement of employees from one job
title to another as part of a career ladder, the City may "credit" eligible employees with
completed years of service to reflect objective criteria such as prior experience or training so
long as the criteria are fully disclosed and consistently applied.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have fixed their hands and seals the day
and year first above written.
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY RECORDER
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By:______________________________
ERIN MENDENHALL
MAYOR
Approved as to form
_________________________________
Jaysen R. Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney
LOCAL 1004 OF THE AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND
MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
By: __________________________________
JERRY PHILPOT
PRESIDENT
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
On the ___ day of June 2021, personally appeared before me JERRY PHILPOT, who
being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the President of LOCAL 1004 OF THE
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES,
AFL-CIO, that he executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the Association by authority
of the Board of Directors and that said instrument has been duly ratified and approved by the
membership of the Association and that his execution hereof constitutes a valid and binding
act on behalf of the Association and its membership.
_____________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
Residing in Salt Lake County, Utah
My Commission Expires:
APPENDIX A – WAGE SCHEDULE
FY 2022 - AFSCME Job Titles / Wage Information Effective 6/27/21
100 Series Bargaining Unit
Job Title Pay Grade Old Entry Old 1 Year Old 3 Year Entry 1 Year 3 year
ADVANCED METER INFRASTRUCTURE TECH I 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
ADVANCED METER INFRASTRUCTURE TECH II 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATOR III 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATOR IV 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
AIRPORT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE INSPECTOR 18 18.33 20.63 24.13
AIRPORT LANDSIDE OPERATIONS OFFICER 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
AIRPORT LEAD SIGN TECHNICIAN 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
AIRPORT LIGHTING & SIGN TECHNICIAN 20 19.45 21.87 25.57
AIRPORT MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN I 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
AIRPORT MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN II 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
AIRPORT MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN III 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
AIRPORT MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN IV 22 21.94 24.69 28.87 22.38 25.18 29.45
AIRPORT MAINTENANCE MECHANIC II 20 20.03 22.54 26.37
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SPECIALIST - GROUND TRANSPORTATION *18 18.70 21.04 24.61
ARBORIST CREW FOREMAN *21 21.69 24.39 28.53
ARBORIST I 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
ARBORIST II 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
ARBORIST III 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
ASPHALT EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
ASPHALT EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
BEAUTIFICATION MAINTENANCE WORKER I 12 13.64 15.34 17.96 13.91 15.65 18.32
BEAUTIFICATION MAINTENANCE WORKER II 13 14.44 16.24 19 14.73 16.56 19.38
BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I 17 17.25 19.41 22.71
BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II 18 18.33 20.63 24.13
CARPENTER I 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
CARPENTER II 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
CEMETERY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 17 16.76 18.85 22.04 17.10 19.23 22.48
CENTRAL CONTROL IRRIGATION SPECIALIST *20 19.84 22.31 26.08
COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
CONCRETE FINISHER 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
CONCRETE SAW & GRINDER OPERATOR 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
CONTAINER SERVICE COORDINATOR 19 18.87 21.23 24.83
CONTAINER SERVICE WORKER 14 14.89 16.75 19.59 15.19 17.09 19.98
CUSTODIAN II 11 12.82 14.42 16.87 13.08 14.71 17.21
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE WORKER I 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE WORKER II 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE WORKER III 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 17 16.76 18.85 22.04 17.10 19.23 22.48
FACILITIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER 15 15.79 17.77 20.77 16.11 18.13 21.19
FACILITIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER SENIOR 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS SENIOR REPAIR TECH 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
FLEET BODY REPAIR/PAINTER 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
FLEET MAINTENANCE COORDINATOR 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
FLEET MECHANIC 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
FLEET MECHANIC TRAINEE 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
FLEET PARTS DELIVERY DRIVER 11 12.82 14.42 16.87 13.08 14.71 17.21
FLEET SERVICES WORKER 15 15.32 17.23 20.15 15.63 17.57 20.55
FLORIST II 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
FLORIST III 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER I 13 14.44 16.24 19 14.73 16.56 19.38
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER II 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER III 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER III 16 16.26 18.29 21.41
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER IV 19 18.87 21.23 24.83
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER V 20 19.45 21.87 25.57
GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORKER V 21 20.66 23.24 27.17
GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE WORKER 18 17.79 19.99 23.39
GRAFFITI RESPONSE FIELD TECHNICIAN 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
HVAC TECHNICIAN I 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
HVAC TECHNICIAN II 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
IRRIGATION OPERATOR I 15 15.32 17.23 20.15 15.63 17.57 20.55
IRRIGATION OPERATOR II 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
LANDSCAPE RESTORATION LEAD WORKER 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
LEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE TECH 21 20.66 23.24 27.17 21.07 23.70 27.71
LEAD COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
LEAD EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
FY 2022 - AFSCME Job Titles / Wage Information Effective 6/27/21
100 Series Bargaining Unit
Job Title Pay Grade Old Entry Old 1 Year Old 3 Year Entry 1 Year 3 year
LEAD HVAC TECHNICIAN *22 22.38 25.18 29.45
LEAD WATERSHED RANGER *21 21.07 23.70 27.71
MAINTENTANCE ELECTRICIAN I 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
MAINTENTANCE ELECTRICIAN II 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
MAINTENTANCE ELECTRICIAN III 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
MAINTENTANCE ELECTRICIAN IV 22 21.94 24.69 28.87 22.38 25.18 29.45
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST I *17 17.60 19.80 23.16
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST II *19 19.25 21.65 25.33
MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST III *21 21.07 23.70 27.71
METAL FABRICATION TECHNICIAN 22 21.94 24.69 28.87 22.38 25.18 29.45
PAINTER I 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
PAINTER II 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
PARKS GROUNDSKEEPER 12 13.64 15.34 17.96 13.91 15.65 18.32
PARKS MAINTENANCE WORKER IRRIGATION SPECIALIST 18 17.79 19.99 23.39
PARTS WAREHOUSE SUPPORT WORKER FLEET *14 15.19 17.09 19.98
PLUMBER APPRENTICE 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
PLUMBER I 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
PLUMBER II 21 20.66 23.24 27.17 21.07 23.70 27.71
PUMPS MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
SANITATION ENFORCEMENT LEAD 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
SANITATION ENFORCEMENT SPECIALIST 15 15.79 17.77 20.77 16.11 18.13 21.19
SANITATION PERMIT COORDINATOR 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
SENIOR ASPHALT EQUIPMENT OPERATOR 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
SENIOR EQUIPMENT OPERATOR *19 19.25 21.65 25.33
SENIOR FACILITIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
SENIOR FACILITIES LANDSCAPER 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
SENIOR FLEET MECHANIC 21 20.66 23.24 27.17 21.07 23.70 27.71
SENIOR FLORIST 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
SENIOR IRRIGATION OPERATOR 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
SENIOR NATURAL RESOURCE TECHNICIAN *16 16.59 18.66 21.84
SENIOR PARKS GROUNDSKEEPER 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
SENIOR PUMPS MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
SENIOR UTILITY LOCATOR 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
SENIOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OPERATOR 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
SENIOR WATER METER TECHNICIAN*21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
SENIOR WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OPERATOR 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
SPRINKLER IRRIGATION TECH I 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
SPRINKLER IRRIGATION TECH II 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
SPRINKLER IRRIGATION TECH III 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
SR BEAUTIFICATION MAINTENANCE WORKER 14 14.89 16.75 19.59 15.19 17.09 19.98
STREETS MAINTENANCE LEAD 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
STREETS RESPONSE TEAM I 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
STREETS RESPONSE TEAM II 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
STREETS RESPONSE TEAM LEAD 21 20.66 23.24 27.17 21.07 23.70 27.71
TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE LEAD 21 20.66 23.24 27.17 21.07 23.70 27.71
TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE OPERATOR I 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE OPERATOR II 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
UTILITY LOCATOR-PUBLIC UTILITIES 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
W & R EDUCATION SPECIALIST *15 15.63 17.57 20.55
W & R PERMIT COORDINATOR *19 19.25 21.65 25.33
W & R EQUIPMENT OPERATOR I *16 16.59 18.66 21.84
W & R EQUIPMENT OPERATOR II *18 18.15 20.39 23.86
WASTEWATER COLLECT MAINTENANCE WORKER LEAD 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAINTENANCE TRAINEE 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAINTENANCE WORKER I 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAINTENANCE WORKER II 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
WASTEWATER LIFT STATION LEAD WORKER 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
WASTEWATER LIFT STATION WORKER 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
WASTEWATER PLANT MAINTENANCE OPERATOR I 15 15.32 17.23 20.15 15.63 17.57 20.55
WASTEWATER PLANT MAINTENANCE OPERATOR II 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
WASTEWATER PLANT MAINTENANCE OPERATOR III 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
WASTEWATER PLANT MAINTENANCE OPERATOR IV 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
WASTEWATER PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE WORKER 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OPERATOR I 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM OPERATOR II 20 19.45 21.87 25.57 19.84 22.31 26.08
WATER DISTRIBUTION VALVE OPERATOR 15 15.79 17.77 20.77 16.11 18.13 21.19
WATER DISTRIBUTION VALVE OPERATOR TRAINEE 13 14.44 16.24 19 14.73 16.56 19.38
WATER MAINTENANCE SUPPORT WORKER 14 14.89 16.75 19.59 15.19 17.09 19.98
FY 2022 - AFSCME Job Titles / Wage Information Effective 6/27/21
100 Series Bargaining Unit
Job Title Pay Grade Old Entry Old 1 Year Old 3 Year Entry 1 Year 3 year
WATER METER READER I 13 14.06 15.82 18.5 14.34 16.14 18.87
WATER METER READER II 14 14.89 16.75 19.59 15.19 17.09 19.98
WATER METER READER III 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
WATER METER TECHNCIAN I 16 16.26 18.29 21.41 16.59 18.66 21.84
WATER METER TECHNICIAN II 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
WATER METER TECHNICIAN III 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
WATER PLANT OPERATOR I 18 17.79 19.99 23.39 18.15 20.39 23.86
WATER PLANT OPERATOR II 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY OPERATOR I 18 18.33 20.63 24.13 18.70 21.04 24.61
WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY OPERATOR II 20 20.03 22.54 26.37 20.43 22.99 26.90
WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY OPERATOR III 21 21.26 23.91 27.97 21.69 24.39 28.53
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OPERATOR I 17 17.25 19.41 22.71 17.60 19.80 23.16
WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE OPERATOR II 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
WATERSHED RANGER 19 18.87 21.23 24.83 19.25 21.65 25.33
W& R PROGRAM LEAD *20 20.43 22.99 26.90
* = New job title
FY 2022 - AFSCME Job Titles / Wage Information Effective 6/27/21
200 Series Bargaining Unit
Job Title Pay Grade old Entry old 1 Year old 4 Year old 6 Year old 8 Year Entry 1 Year 4 Year 6 Year 8 Year
ACCESS CONTROL SPECIALIST 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
AIRPORT OPERATIONS COORDINATOR I 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
AIRPORT OPERATIONS COORDINATOR II 16 17.10 18.31 20.76 21.97 25.70 17.44 18.68 21.18 22.41 26.21
AIRPORT OPERATIONS LEAD COORDINATOR 18 18.35 19.67 22.29 23.59 27.61 18.72 20.06 22.74 24.06 28.16
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SECURITY SPECIALIST 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
BUILDING INSPECTOR I 19 19.70 21.11 23.93 25.33 29.64 20.09 21.53 24.41 25.84 30.23
BUSINESS LICENSE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
BUSINESS LICENSING PROCESSOR I 14 14.98 16.04 18.20 19.26 22.53 15.28 16.36 18.56 19.65 22.98
BUSINESS LICENSING PROCESSOR II 16 17.10 18.31 20.76 21.97 25.70 17.44 18.68 21.18 22.41 26.21
CITY PAYMENTS PROCESSOR 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OFFICER I 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II 19 19.70 21.11 23.93 25.33 29.64 20.09 21.53 24.41 25.84 30.23
CONTRACTS PROCESS COORDINATOR 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
CONTRACTS TECHNICIAN 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL INSPECTOR 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
CROSSING GUARD COORDINATOR*13 14.47 15.50 17.57 18.60 21.77 14.76 15.81 17.92 18.97 22.21
CUSTOMER SERVICE ACCOUNTS COLLECTOR/INVESTIGATOR 18 18.35 19.67 22.29 23.59 27.61 18.72 20.06 22.74 24.06 28.16
HEARING OFFICER REFEREE COORD I 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
HEARING OFFICER REFEREE COORD II 18 18.35 19.67 22.29 23.59 27.61 18.72 20.06 22.74 24.06 28.16
JUDICIAL ASSISTANT I 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
JUDICIAL ASSISTANT II 16 17.10 18.31 20.76 21.97 25.70 17.44 18.68 21.18 22.41 26.21
JUDICIAL ASSISTANT III 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
LEAD HEARING OFFICER REFEREE COORDINATOR 19 19.70 21.11 23.93 25.33 29.64 20.09 21.53 24.41 25.84 30.23
LEAD JUDICIAL ASSISTANT 19 19.70 21.11 23.93 25.33 29.64 20.09 21.53 24.41 25.84 30.23
OFFICE TECHNICIAN I 12 13.96 14.96 16.95 17.95 21.00 14.24 15.26 17.29 18.31 21.42
OFFICE TECHNICIAN II 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
PARTS WAREHOUSE SUPPORT WORKER - FLEET 14 14.98 16.04 18.20 19.26 22.53 15.28 16.36 18.56 19.65 22.98
PERMIT PROCESSOR I 14 14.98 16.04 18.20 19.26 22.53 15.28 16.36 18.56 19.65 22.98
PERMIT PROCESSOR II 16 17.10 18.31 20.76 21.97 25.70 17.44 18.68 21.18 22.41 26.21
POLICE INFORMATION SPECIALIST 13 14.47 15.50 17.57 18.60 21.77 14.76 15.81 17.92 18.97 22.21
PRETREATMENT SENIOR SAMPLER/INSPECTOR 19 19.70 21.11 23.93 25.33 29.64 20.09 21.53 24.41 25.84 30.23
PROGRAM ASSISTANT 13 14.47 15.50 17.57 18.60 21.77 14.76 15.81 17.92 18.97 22.21
PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER*16 17.10 18.31 20.76 21.97 25.70 17.44 18.68 21.18 22.41 26.21
QUALITY ASSURANCE SAMPLER - CULINARY WATER 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
QUALITY ASSURANCE SENIOR SAMPLER - CULINARY WATER 17 17.68 18.94 21.47 22.74 26.58 18.03 19.32 21.90 23.19 27.11
QUARTERMASTER TECHNICIAN 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
RECEPTIONIST 10 12.50 13.37 15.17 16.05 18.78 12.75 13.64 15.47 16.37 19.16
SENIOR COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
SENIOR POLICE INFORMATION SPECIALIST 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
SENIOR PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHER*18 18.35 19.67 22.29 23.59 27.61 18.72 20.06 22.74 24.06 28.16
SENIOR SECRETARY 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
SENIOR UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVE - ALL TYPES including BILLING/
CONTRACTS/ CUSTOMER SVC/ OFFICE TECH 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
SENIOR UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVE - GENERALIST 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
SENIOR WAREHOUSE OPERATOR 15 16.08 17.22 19.52 20.66 24.16 16.40 17.56 19.91 21.07 24.64
UTILITIES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SPECIALIST 16 17.10 18.31 20.76 21.97 25.70 17.44 18.68 21.18 22.41 26.21
UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVE II - All types including BILLING/ CONTRACTS/
CUSTOMER SVC/ OFFICE TECH 12 13.96 14.96 16.95 17.95 21.00 14.24 15.26 17.29 18.31 21.42
UTILITIES REPRESENTATIVE I - All types including BILLING/ CONTRACTS/
CUSTOMER SVC/ OFFICE TECH 10 12.50 13.37 15.17 16.05 18.78 12.75 13.64 15.47 16.37 19.16
WAREHOUSE OFFICE TECHNICIAN II 15 15.50 16.61 18.83 19.93 23.32 15.81 16.94 19.21 20.33 23.79
WAREHOUSE SUPPORT WORKER - AIRPORT/ FLEET 14 14.98 16.04 18.20 19.26 22.53 15.28 16.36 18.56 19.65 22.98
* = New job title
FY 2022 - AFSCME Job Titles / Wage Information Effective 6/27/21
330 Series Bargaining Unit
Job Title Pay Grade old Entry old 2 year old 4year old 6 year Entry 2 year 4 year 6 year
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY I 18 18.67 19.76 20.87 23.11 19.04 20.16 21.29 23.57
AIRFIELD MAINTENANCE ELECTRICIAN 25 25.94 27.47 29.00 32.13 26.46 28.02 29.58 32.77
AIRPORT ENGINEERING RECORDS PROGRAM SPECIALIST 20 20.32 21.51 22.71 25.16 20.73 21.94 23.16 25.66
AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST I 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13
AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST II 26 27.23 28.84 30.44 33.73
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SPECIALIST - AIRFIELD 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SPECIALIST - TERMINALS 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
AIRPORT PROCUREMENT SPECIALIST 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATE III 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATE IV 24 24.71 26.16 27.61 30.59 25.20 26.68 28.16 31.20
BUILDING INSPECTOR II 24 24.71 26.16 27.61 30.59 25.20 26.68 28.16 31.20
BUILDING INSPECTOR III 27 28.60 30.27 31.96 35.42 29.17 30.88 32.60 36.13
COMMUNICATION AND GIS COORDINATOR*18 19.04 20.16 21.29 23.57
CRIME SCENE TECHNICIAN I 16 16.88 17.89 18.88 20.92 17.22 18.25 19.26 21.34
CRIME SCENE TECHNICIAN II 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09 19.84 21.00 22.17 24.57
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL TECHNICIAN*21 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER I 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PLANNER II 25 25.94 27.47 29.00 32.13 26.46 28.02 29.58 32.77
ENGINEERING CONTRACTS COORD - PUBLIC UTILITIES 22 22.41 23.74 25.05 27.75 22.86 24.21 25.55 28.31
ENGINEERING INFORMATION AND RECORDS SPECIALIST 20 20.32 21.51 22.71 25.16 20.73 21.94 23.16 25.66
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09 19.84 21.00 22.17 24.57
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN III 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN IV 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN V 24 24.71 26.16 27.61 30.59 25.20 26.68 28.16 31.20
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST II *26 27.77 29.42 31.05 34.40
EVENTS COORDINATOR - RAC 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
EVENTS COORDINATOR - SORENSEN 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN I 15 15.86 16.86 17.80 19.71 16.18 17.20 18.16 20.10
EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN II 18 18.67 19.76 20.87 23.11 19.04 20.16 21.29 23.57
FIRE LOGISTICS COORDINATOR 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09
FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST I 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09
FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST II 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13
FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER 26 27.23 28.84 30.44 33.73 27.77 29.42 31.05 34.40
FLEET CUSTOMER SERVICE ADVISOR 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09 19.84 21.00 22.17 24.57
FLEET MAINTENANCE COORD - PUBLIC UTILITIES 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
FORENSIC SCIENTIST I 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
FOREST AREA SERVICE COORDINATOR 22 22.41 23.74 25.05 27.75 22.86 24.21 25.55 28.31
GIS LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN II 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
GIS TECHNICIAN II 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13
HOUSING & ZONING LEGAL INVESTIGATOR 27 28.60 30.27 31.96 35.42 29.17 30.88 32.60 36.13
HOUSING REHAB SPECIALIST I 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
HOUSING REHAB SPECIALIST II 25 25.94 27.47 29.00 32.13 26.46 28.02 29.58 32.77
LAB CHEMIST 24 24.71 26.16 27.61 30.59 25.20 26.68 28.16 31.20
LABORATORY ANALYST 20 20.32 21.51 22.71 25.16
LEAD FLEET CUSTOMER ADVISOR *21 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
OFFICE FACILITATOR I 18 18.67 19.76 20.87 23.11
OFFICE FACILITATOR II 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09
PARKING PAY STATION TECHNICIAN 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
PARKS USAGE COORDINATOR 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
PLANS EXAMINER I 25 25.94 27.47 29.00 32.13 26.46 28.02 29.58 32.77
PLANS EXAMINER II 26 27.23 28.84 30.44 33.73 27.77 29.42 31.05 34.40
PLANS EXAMNER III 27 28.60 30.27 31.96 35.42 29.17 30.88 32.60 36.13
POLICE FLEET SERVICES COORDINATOR 18 18.67 19.76 20.87 23.11 19.04 20.16 21.29 23.57
POLICE INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
POLICE SERVICES COORDINATOR 20 20.32 21.51 22.71 25.16 20.73 21.94 23.16 25.66
PRETREATMENT INSPECTOR/PERMIT WRITER 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
PROJECT COORDINATOR III AIRPORT 22 22.41 23.74 25.05 27.75 22.86 24.21 25.55 28.31
PUBLIC UTILITIES RECORDS PROGRAM SPECIALIST 20 20.32 21.51 22.71 25.16 20.73 21.94 23.16 25.66
REAL ESTATE SERVICES PERMIT SPECIALIST *21 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
SENIOR FLEET CUSTOMER SERVICE ADVISOR 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43
SENIOR LAB ANALYST 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
SENIOR PLANS EXAMINER 29 31.55 33.41 35.26 39.07 32.18 34.08 35.97 39.85
SENIOR POLICE INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
SENIOR TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN I 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
SENIOR TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN II 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
FY 2022 - AFSCME Job Titles / Wage Information Effective 6/27/21
330 Series Bargaining Unit
Job Title Pay Grade old Entry old 2 year old 4year old 6 year Entry 2 year 4 year 6 year
SPECIAL EVENTS ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 18 18.67 19.76 20.87 23.11
SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS COORDINATOR *21 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
STORMWATER QUALITY COORDINATOR 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
STORMWATER TECHNICIAN 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
SURVEYOR III 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER OPERATOR I 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER OPERATOR II 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
TRAFFIC COORDINATOR 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09 19.84 21.00 22.17 24.57
TRAFFIC SIGNAL LEAD 24 24.71 26.16 27.61 30.59 25.20 26.68 28.16 31.20
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN I 21 21.34 22.60 23.85 26.43 21.77 23.05 24.33 26.96
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
TRAFFIC TECHNICIAN 19 19.45 20.59 21.74 24.09 19.84 21.00 22.17 24.57
UTILITIES PLANNER 24 24.71 26.16 27.61 30.59 25.20 26.68 28.16 31.20
VOL & OUTREACH COORD *19 19.84 21.00 22.17 24.57
WATER RECLAMATION PLANNER/SCHEDULER 23 23.53 24.91 26.30 29.13 24.00 25.41 26.83 29.71
* = New job title
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the
International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees, pursuant to
the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011)
An ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City
Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible
employees, pursuant to the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution
dated March 22, 2011, which Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon
proper ratification and signature.
PREAMBLE
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81,
representing eligible employees, have agreed to a Memorandum of Understanding pursuant to
the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011,
which Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon proper ratification and
signature. Section 6 of the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution
dated March 22, 2011 provides that a memorandum of understanding requires the City Council
to approve the memorandum of understanding, enact implementing legislation, and appropriate
all required funds.
The Memorandum of Understanding is a three-year agreement effective for fiscal years
2022-2024. The Memorandum of Understanding is subject to appropriation of funds by the City
Council and the City Council hereby appropriates funds to implement the provisions of the
Memorandum of Understanding, as negotiated by Salt Lake City Corporation and the
International Association of Firefighters Local 81, for fiscal year 2022.
2
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to approve the Memorandum
of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of
Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees, and to appropriate necessary funds to
implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding.
SECTION 2. The Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation
and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees, is
hereby approved and the necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of
the Memorandum of Understanding are hereby appropriated.
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION. The Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby
authorized to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of
Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of
Firefighters Local 81, assuming the Memorandum of Understanding is properly ratified and
signed.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on
____________, 2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of June, 2021.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
3
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: __________________ 2021.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
By:_______________________
Jonathan Pappasideris
Jonathan Pappasideris
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022,
the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters
Local 81, representing eligible employees)
An ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the
provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated effective July 1, 2018 between Salt Lake
City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible
employees.
PREAMBLE
The City Council, in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ___ of 2021, approved a
Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81, as the certified bargaining representative for eligible
employees. The Memorandum of Understanding is a three-year agreement. The Memorandum
of Understanding is subject to appropriation of funds by the City Council. The City Council,
therefore, wishes to appropriate funds to implement the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding, as negotiated by the City and the International Association of Firefighters Local
81, for fiscal year 2022.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to appropriate necessary
funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
approved by the City Council in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ___ of 2021 between Salt Lake
City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81.
2
SECTION 2. APPROPRIATION. The City Council hereby appropriates necessary
funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81,
as approved by the City Council in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ___ of 2021.
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION. The Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby
authorized to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July __,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of June, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
By:_______________________
Jonathan Pappasideris
Jonathan Pappasideris
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Appropriating necessary funds to implement the wage schedule and other contemplated
appropriations for fiscal year 2022, for eligible employees represented by the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81, contingent on final approval and ratification of the
Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81)
PREAMBLE
Pursuant to City Resolution No. 15 of 2011, the City Council has the authority to approve
the wage schedule for eligible employees represented by the International Association of
Firefighters Local 81and also has the authority to approve the Memorandum of Understanding
between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81.
The Council desires to appropriate funds to implement the wage schedule and any appropriations
associated with the Memorandum of Understanding for fiscal year 2022, contingent on final
approval and ratification of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the
International Association of Firefighters Local 81.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND CONTINGENT APPROPRIATION. The purpose of this
ordinance is to appropriate necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the wage schedule
and any other funds contemplated by the Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City
Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81. This appropriation is
contingent on final approval and ratification of the Memorandum of Understanding and such
contingency will be released when the final Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake
City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81 is approved by the City
Council. Until the City Council approves the final Memorandum of Understanding, the current
2
Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81 will remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 2. AUTHORIZATION. Upon the release of the budget contingency set forth
in Section 1, the Mayor of Salt Lake City Corporation is authorized to implement the wage
schedule and any other appropriations contemplated in the Memorandum of Understanding.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July __,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of June, 2021.
______________________________
Amy Fowler, Council Chair
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
_______________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Katherine Lewis
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2021
(Approving the Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of
Salt Lake City Corporation)
An ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt
Lake City Corporation.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to approve the attached
Compensation Plan for all non-represented Salt Lake City Corporation employees. Three copies
of said Compensation Plan shall be maintained in the City Recorder’s Office (whose permanent
office is located at 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 but whose office
is temporarily located at 349 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84111) for public inspection.
SECTION 2. APPLICATION. The attached Compensation Plan shall not apply to Salt
Lake City Corporation employees whose employment terminated prior to the effective date of
this ordinance.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on June 27,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of June, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
2
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _____ of 2021.
Published: ____________________
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date: ______________________
By: __________________________
Jonathan Pappasideris
Jonathan pappasideris
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
PLAN for Non-Represented
Employees
FY2022
Page | 1
FY 2022 COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-REPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this plan shall be effective commencing June 27, 2021, unless otherwise noted.
EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THIS PLAN
This plan applies to all full-time city employees. This plan does not apply to employees
classified as: seasonal, hourly, temporary, part -time or those covered by a memorandum
of understanding.
AUTHORITY OF THE MAYOR
Employees covered by this compensation plan may be appointed, classified, and advanced
under rules and regulations promulgated by the mayor within budget limitations
established by the city council.
Furthermore, the mayor may authorize leave not specified in this compensation plan to
provide for operational flexibility, so long as the additional leave does not exceed the
equivalent of eight hours of leave per employee, per year. However, with the exception of
a benefit created or expanded pursuant to Section IV, Subsection X (“Emergency Leave”),
the mayor may not otherwise create a new benefit or expand an existing benefit for
employees covered by this compensation plan if doing so will result in a direct,
measurable cost. A direct, measurable cost includes a circumstance where the total cost
of the new benefit or expansion of an existing benefit exceeds appropriated funds.
Further, city council input and approval is required if the creation of a new benefit has
policy implications or is already addressed in this compensation plan.
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
All provisions in this compensation plan are subject to the appropriation of funds by the city
council.
MODIFICATION, SUSPENSION, OR REVOCATION OF PROVISIONS
If a local emergency is declared, any provision in this compensation plan may be temporarily
modified, suspended, or revoked for the duration (or any portion thereof) of the period of local
emergency, if so authorized by the mayor and/or city council .
Page | 2
SECTION I: DEFINITIONS
SUBSECTION I - DEFINITION OF TERMS
As used in this compensation plan:
1. “Appointed employees,” with the exception of justice court judges who are
covered under this plan, means employees who are "at-will" employees serving
at the pleasure of the mayor (or the city council if they are employees of the
Office of the City Council).
2. “Adult Designee” means any individual with whom an employee has a long-term,
committed relationship of mutual caring and support. The adult designee must
have resided in the same household with the eligible employee for at least the
past 12 consecutive months and must have common financial obligations with
the employee. The adult designee and the employee must be jointly responsible
for each other’s welfare.
3. "Exempt” refers to any employee who is not eligible to receive
compensation for overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
4. “FLSA” means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
5. “Full-time employee” means employees whose positions regularly require more
than 30 hours per week on a full-time schedule.
6. "Non-Exempt” refers to an employee who is entitled to receive overtime
compensation pursuant to the FLSA.
SECTION II: EMPLOYEE WAGES, SALARIES & BENEFITS
SUBSECTION I - COMPENSATION PROGRAM & SALARY SCHEDULES
The city’s compensation system and program, in conjunction with this plan , is intended to
attract, motivate and retain qualified personnel necessary to effectively meet public service
demands.
A. Determination
1. The mayor shall develop policies and guidelines for the administration of the
pay plans.
2. To the degree that funds permit, employees shall be paid com pensation that:
a. Is commensurate with the skills and abilities required of the position;
Page | 3
b. Achieves equal pay for equal work;
c. Attains comparability and is competitive with the compensation paid by
other public and/or private employers with whom the city compares
and/or competes for personnel recruitment and retention. The city shall
consider itself competitive when data indicates actual median employee
pay rates plus the overall additional economic value of benefits equals
at least 100% compared to market.
3. To the extent possible, market surveys shall be used to assess and evaluate the
city’s competitiveness with a cross section of organizations with whom the city
competes for personnel recruitment and retention. This may include one or
more of the following:
a. Compensation surveys, including actual pay and other cash allowances paid
to employees.
b. Benefits surveys, including paid leave, group insurance plans, retirement, and
other employer-provided and voluntary benefits.
c. Regular review of the city’s compensation plans and pay structures to
ensure salary ranges and regular pay practices provide for job growth and
encourage employee productivity.
B. Salary Schedules
1. All Employees covered under this plan (except for those designated as “Elected
Officials”) shall be paid base wages or salaries according to the General Employee
Pay Plan attached as Appendix “A.” Wages and salaries shall not be less than the
established range minimum or higher than the range maximum, unless otherwise
approved by the mayor or mayor’s designee.
2. Appointed Employees: The specific pay level assignments for Appointed
Employees are shown in Appendix “B.”
3. Elected Officials: Elected officials shall be paid annual compensation according
to schedule attached as Appendix "C."
C. Other Compensation
The mayor or the city council may distribute appropriated monies to city employees
as discretionary retention incentives or retirement contributions; or special lump
sum supplemental payments. Retention incentives or special lump sum payments
are subject to the mayor’s or city council’s approval.
Page | 4
SUBSECTION II - EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022
For employees covered under this plan, the city will increase each employee’s base pay by one
percent. Salaries for elected officials will, also, be increased by one percent.
The city’s living wage for regular, full-time employees is set and shall be no less than $15.11 per
hour.
SUBSECTION III - EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
The city will make available group medical, health and flex savings plans, dental, life,
accidental death & dismemberment, long-term disability insurance, voluntary benefits and
an employee assistance program (EAP) to all eligible employees and their eligible spouse,
adult designee, dependents and dependents of adult designee pursuant to city policy.
A. Employer-Paid Contributions. Effective July 1, 2021, the city’s contribution toward
the total premium for group medical will be 95% for the high -deductible Summit
Star Plan. For employees enrolled in the high-deductible Summit Star Plan, the city
will also contribute a one-time total of $750 into a qualified health savings account
(HSA) or a Medical Flex Account for those enrolled for single coverage and $1,500
for those enrolled for double or family coverage per plan year. Health savings
account or Medical Flex account contributions will be pro-rated for any employee
hired after July 1, 2021.
B. 501(c) (9) Post Employment Health Reimbursement Account. The city will contribute
$24.30 per bi-weekly pay period into each employee’s Post Employment Health
Reimbursement Account. For any year in which there are 27 pay periods, no such
contribution will be made in the 27th pay period.
SUBSECTION IV - WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
The city will provide workers’ compensation coverage to employees as required by applicable
law.
SUBSECTION V - SOCIAL SECURITY EXCEPTION FOR POLICE & FIRE
All sworn employees in the Police and Fire departments covered under this plan are exempt from
the provisions of the federal Social Security System unless determined otherwise by the city or
required by applicable law.
SUBSECTION VI - RETIREMENT
A. Retirement Programs. The city hereby adopts the Utah State Retirement System for
providing retirement benefits to employees covered by the plan. The city may permit
or require the participation of employees in its retiremen t program(s) under terms
and conditions established by the mayor and consistent with applicable law. Such
programs may include:
Page | 5
1. The Utah State Public Employees (Contributory and Non-Contributory); Public
Safety Retirement Systems; or, the Utah Firefighters Retirement System; or,
2. Deferred compensation programs.
B. The 2021-2022 fiscal year retirement contribution rates for employees, including
elected officials, are shown in Appendix “D.”
SECTION III: WORK HOURS, OVERTIME & OTHER PAY ALLOWANCES
SUBSECTION I – WORK HOURS
A. The city’s standard work week begins Sunday at 12:00am and ends the following
Saturday at 11:59pm. Alternatives to the standard work week may be authorized and
adopted for specific work groups, such as:
1. The standard work schedule for combat Fire Battalion Chiefs, which includes
two consecutive 24-hour shifts immediately followed by 96 hours off.
SUBSECTION II- OVERTIME COMPENSATION
A. Overtime Compensation. The city will pay non-exempt employees overtime
compensation as required by the FLSA. The city will pay overtime hours at 1 ½ times
the employee’s regular hourly rate or, at the employee’s request and with their
department director’s approval, provide compensatory time off at a rate of 1½
hours for each overtime hour in lieu of overtime compensation.
1. Employees may accrue compensatory time up to a maximum amount as
determined by their department director.
2. The city may elect at any time to pay an employee for any or all accrued
compensatory hours.
3. The city will includ e only actual hours worked and holiday leave hours when
calculating overtime.
4. When used, personal leave and compensatory time will not be included in the
calculation of overtime.
5. The city will pay out all accrued compensatory hours whenever an employee’s
status or position changes from FLSA non-exempt to exempt.
B. Labor Costs— Declared Emergency— Overtime Compensation for FLSA Exempt
Employees. The city may pay exempt employees overtime pay for any hours
Page | 6
worked over forty (40) hours in a workweek at a rate equivalent to their regular
base hourly rate of pay during periods of emergency. The city shall only make such
payment when all of the following conditions occur:
1. The mayor or the city council has issued a “Proclamation of Local Emergency”
or the city responds to an extraordinary emergency; and,
2. Exempt employees are required to work over forty (40) hours for one or more
workweek(s) during the emergency period: and,
3. The mayor and/or the city council approve the use of available funds to cover
the overtime payments.
The city shall distribute any overtime payments consistently with a pre -defined
standard that treats all exempt employees equitably. Hours worked under a
declared or extraordinary emergency must be paid hours and cannot be accrued as
compensatory time.
SUBSECTION III - LONGEVITY PAY
A. Eligibility. With the exception of elected officials, the city will pay a monthly
longevity benefit to full-time employees based on the most recent date an employee
began full -time employment as follows:
1. Employees who have completed six (6) consecutive years of employment
with the city will receive $50;
2. Employees who have completed ten (10) consecutive years of employment
with the city will receive $75;
3. Employees who have completed sixteen (16) full years of employment wit h
the city will receive $100; and,
4. Employees who have completed twenty (20) full years of employment with
the city will receive $125.
B. Pension Base Pay. Longevity pay will be included in base pay for purposes of
pension contributions.
C. Longevity While on an Unpaid Leave of Absence. Employees do not earn or
receive longevity payments while on an unpaid leave of absence. When an
employee returns from an approved unpaid leave of absence, longevity
payments will resume.
Page | 7
SUBSECTION IV - WAGE DIFFERENTIALS & ADDITIONAL PAY
Eligible employees receive certain wage differentials as follows:
A. Call Back and Call Out Pay. Non-exempt employees will be paid Call Back or Call Out
pay based upon department director approval and the following guidelines:
1. Call Back Pay: Non-sworn, non-exempt employees who have been released
from normally scheduled work and standby periods, and who are directed
by an appropriate department head or designated representative to return
to work prior to their next scheduled normal duty shift, will be paid for a
minimum of three (3) hours straight-time pay and, in addition, will be
guaranteed a minimum four (4) hours work at straight-time pay.
2. Call Out Pay for Police Sergeants. Sergeants who have been released from
their scheduled work shifts and have been directed by an appropriate
division head or designated representative to perform work without at
least 24 hours advance notice or scheduling, shall be compensated as
follows:
a. Sergeants who are directed to report to work shall receive a
minimum of four (4) hours compensation at one and one-half times
their hourly wage rate, or one and one-half times their hourly wage
rate for actual hours worked, whichever is greater.
b. Sergeants who are assigned to day shift, and who are directed to
perform work within eight (8) hours prior to the beginning of their
regularly scheduled shift shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours
compensation at one and one-half times their hourly wage rate, or
one and one-half times their hourly wage rate for actual hours
worked, whichever is greater.
c. Sergeants who are assigned to afternoon or grave yard shifts, and who
are directed to perform work within eight (8) hours following the end
of their regularly scheduled shift shall receive a minimum of four (4)
hours compensation at one and one-half times their hourly wage rate,
or one and one-half times their hourly wage rate for actual
hours worked, whichever is greater.
B. Standby Pay : Non-exempt employees are eligible to receive Standby pay based
upon the following guidelines.
1. Standby for Non-Sworn Employees: Non-exempt, non-sworn employees
who have been released from normally scheduled work but have not
been released from standby status will be paid either two (2) hours of
straight time pay for each 24 hour period of limited standby status; or
Page | 8
two (2) hours straight time pay for each 12-hour period of standby status
if they are Department of Airports or Public Utilities Department
employees.
a. First Call to Work. An eligible employee who is directed to return to
his or her normal work site during an assigned Standby period by a
department head or designated representative without advanced
notice or scheduling will be paid a guaranteed minimum of four (4)
hours, which may include any combination of hours worked and/or
non-worked straight-time pay.
b. Additional Calls to Work. An eligible employee will be paid an
additional guaranteed minimum of two (2) hours, which may include
any combination of hours worked and/or non-worked straight-time
pay, for each additional occasion he or she is called to work during
the same twenty-four (24) or twelve (12) hour standby period.
c. Exclusion for Snow Fighters. Any employee on standby as a member
of the Snow Fighter Corps shall not receive standby/on-call pay or
shift differential when on standby or called back to fight snow.
2. Standby for Police Sergeants: Police Sergeants directed by their division
commander or designee to keep themselves available for city service
during otherwise off-duty hours shall be compensated two (2) hours of
straight time for each 12-hour period of standby status. This
compensation shall be in addition to any callout pay or pay for time
worked the employee may receive during the standby period.
C. Extra-Duty Shifts for Police Sergeants. "Extra-duty shifts" are defined as scheduled or
unscheduled hours worked other than the sergeant's normally scheduled work shifts.
"Extra-duty shifts" do not include extension or carry over of the sergeant's normally
scheduled work shift.
1. Any sergeant required by the city to work extra-duty shifts shall receive
a minimum of three (3) hours compensation at one and one-half times
their regular base hourly rate, or time worked paid at one and one-half
times their regular hourly base wage rate, whichever is greater.
D. Shift Allowance, not including Police Sergeants & Lieutenants. Only non- exempt
employees who perform afternoon/ swing or evening shift work are eligible to
receive a shift allowance.
1. The city will include all shift allowance when computing overtime. An
employee who receives Snow Fighter Corps differential pay is not eligible to
also receive shift allowance.
Page | 9
2. Day Shift: No allowance will be paid for work hours which are part of a
regular day shift.
3. Eligible Hours: For each non-day shift hour worked between the hours of
6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., the city will pay an eligible non-exempt
employee a differential of $1.00 per hour.
E. Shift Differential for Police Sergeants & Lieutenants: The city will pay Police sergeants
& lieutenants shift differentials according to the shift actually worked. Actual shift
differential rates are determined as follows:
1. Day Shift: No differential pay for hours worked during day shift, which begins
at 0500 hours until 1159 hours.
2. Swing Shift: A differential of 2.5% in addition to the regular day rate shall be
paid for swing shift, which begins at 1200 hours until 1859 hours.
3. Graveyard Shift: A differential of 5.0% in addition to the regular day rate
shall be paid for graveyard shift, which begins at 1900 hours until 0459
hours.
F. Acting/Working out of Classification. A department head may elect to grant
additional compensation to an employee for work performed on a temporary basis,
whether in an acting capacity or otherwise, beyond the employee’s regular job
classification for any period lasting 20 or more working days. Unless approved by the
mayor or mayor’s designee, acting pay shall be limited to no more than 90 calendar
days from the start date and paid separately from regular earnings on each
employee’s wage statement. Compensation adjustments may be retroactive to the
start date of the temporary job assignmen t. Exceptions may be approved by the
mayor or mayor’s designee.
1. Acting pay shall be excluded when calculating any leave payouts,
including vacation, holiday, and personal leave.
G. Snowfighter Pay. The city will pay employees designated by the department head,
or designee, as members of the Snow Fighter Corps a pay differential equal to $200
per pay period for the snowfighter season not to exceed $2,000 during each fiscal
year for work related to snow removal. This pay shall be separate from regular
earnings on each employee’s wage statement.
SUBSECTION V - EDUCATION AND TRAINING PAY
A. Education Incentives. The mayor may adopt programs to promote employee
education and training, provided that all compensation incentives are authorized
within appropriate budget limitations established by the city council.
Page | 10
1. Police Sergeants, Lieutenants, and Captains are eligible for a $500 per
year job-related training allowance.
2. Fire Battalion/Division Chiefs are eligible for incentive pay following
completion of degree requirements at a fully accredited college or
university and submission of evidence of a diploma to Human Resources.
The city will pay monthly allowances according to the educational degree
held, as follows:
Doctorate………….. $100.00
Masters………..…... $75.00
SUBSECTION VI – OTHER PAY ALLOWANCES
A. Meal Allowance. When approved by management, employees may receive meal
allowances in the amount of $10.00 when an employee works two or more hours
consecutive to their normally scheduled shift. Employees may also be eligible to
receive $10.00 for each additional four-hour consecutive period of work which is in
addition to the normally scheduled work shift.
1. Fire and police department employees shall be provided with adequate
food and drink to maintain safety and performance during emergencies
or extraordinary circumstances.
B. Business Expenses. City policy shall govern the authorization of employee
advancement or reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred while
performing city business. Advance payment or reimbursement for expenses shall
be approved only when the amounts are documented and within the budget
limitations established by the city council.
C. Automobiles
1. The mayor may authorize, subject to the conditions provided in city
policy, an employee to utilize a city vehicle on a take-home basis and
may require an employee to reimburse the city for a portion of the
take -home vehicle cost as provided in city ordinance.
2. Employees who are authorized to use privately-owned automobiles for
official city business will be reimbursed for the operation expenses at the
rate specif ied in city policy.
3. The city will provide a car allowance to department directors, the mayor’s
chief of staff, the mayor’s chief administrative officer, up to three additional
employees in the mayor’s office, and the city council Executive Director at
a rate not to exceed $400 per month A car allowance may be paid to
Page | 11
specific appointed employees at a rate not to exceed $400 per month as
recommended by the mayor and approved by the city council.
D. Uniform Allowance. The city will provide employees who are required to wear
uniforms in the performance of their duties a monthly uniform allowance as
follows:
1. Parking Enforcement Field Supervisor—$65.00
2. Non-sworn Police and Fire Department
employees—$65.00
3. Watershed Management Division
employees—$65.00
4. Fire: Battalion Chiefs will be provided uniforms and other job-related
safety equipment, as needed. Employees may select uniforms and
related equipment from an approved list. The total allowance provided
shall be $600 per year, or the amount received by firefighter employees,
whichever is greater. Appointed employees shall be provided uniforms
or uniform allowances to the extent stated in Fire department policy.
a. Dangerous or contaminated safety equipment shall be cleaned,
repaired, or replaced by the Fire department.
5. Police: Police sergeants, lieutenants, and captains in uniform
assignments, as determined by their bureau commander, will be
enrolled in the department’s quartermaster system.
a. The quartermaster system will operate as follows:
i. Necessary uniform and equipment items, including patrol
uniforms, detective uniforms, duty gear, footwear, cold-
weather gear, headwear, etc. will be provided to Police
sergeants, lieutenants, and captains by the department’s
quartermaster pursuant to department policy.
ii. A full inventory of items that the quartermaster will
provide to Police sergeants, lieutenants and captains within
the quartermaster system and the manner in which they
will be distributed will be stated in department
policy.
iii. Police sergeants, lieutenants and captains in the
quartermaster system will be paid the sum of One
Hundred Dollars ($100) each fiscal year for the purpose of
Page | 12
independently purchasing any incidental uniform item or
equipment not provided by the quartermaster system.
Payment will be made each year on the first day of the
pay-period that includes August 15.
b. The city will provide for the cleaning of uniforms as described in
Police department policy.
c. Police sergeants, lieutenants, and captains in plainclothes
assignments, as determined by their bureau commander, are
provided a clothing and cleaning allowance totaling $39.00 per pay
period. Sergeants, lieutenants, and captains who are transferred
back to a uniform assignment will return to the quartermaster
system upon transfer.
d. Uniforms or uniform allowances for appointed Police employees will
be provided to the extent stated in Police department policy.
E. Allowances for Certified Golf Teaching Professionals. The mayor may, within
budgeted appropriations and as business needs indicate, authorize golf lesson
revenue sharing between the city and employees recognized as Certified Golf
Teaching Professionals as defined in the Golf Division’s Golf Lesson Revenue
Policy. Payment to an employee for lesson revenue generated shall be
reduced by: 1) a ten (10%) percent administrative fee to be retained by the
Golf division, and 2) the employee’s payroll tax withholding requirements in
accordance with applicable law.
F. Other Allowances. The mayor or the city council may, within budgeted
appropriations, authorize th e payment of other allowances in extraordinary
circumstances (as determined by the mayor or the city council).
SUBSECTION VII - SEVERANCE BENEFIT
Subject to availability of funds, any current appointed employee who is not retained, not
terminated for cause and who is separated from city employment involuntarily shall receive
severance benefits based upon their respective appointment date.
A. Severance benefits shall be calculated using the employee’s salary rate in effect on the
employee’s date of termination. Receipt of severance benefits is contingent upon
execution of a release of all claims approved by the city attorney’s office.
1. Employees appointed on or after January 1, 1989 and before January 1,
2000 shall receive a severance benefit equal to one months’ base salary
for each continuous year of city employment in an appointed status
before January 1, 2000. Severance shall be calculated on a pro-rata basis
Page | 13
for a total benefit of up to a maximum of six m onths.
2. Current department heads, along with the mayor’s chief of staff and
the executive director of the city council office, appointed on or after
January 1, 2000 shall receive a severance benefit equal to two month’s
base salary after one full year of continuous city employment in an
appointed status; four months’ base salary after two full years of
continuous city employment in an appointed status; or, six months’ base
salary after three full years or more of continuous city employment in an
appointed status.
3. Current appointed employees who are not department heads, and who
were appointed on or after January 1, 2000 shall receive a severance
benefit equal to one week’s base salary for each year of continuous city
employment in an appointed status, calculated on a pro-rata basis, for a
total benefit of up to a maximum of six weeks.
B. Leave Payout: Appointed employees with leave hour account balances under
Plan A or Plan B shall, in addition to the severance benefit provided, receive a
severance benefit equal to the “retirement benefit” value provided under the
leave plan of which they are a participant (either Plan A or Plan B), if
separation is involuntary and not for cause.
C. Not Eligible for Benefit . An appointed employee is ineligible to be paid
severance benefits under the following circumstances:
1. An employee who, at the time of termination of employment, has been
convicted, indicted, charged or is under active criminal investigation
concerning a public offense involving a felony or moral turpitude. This
provision shall not restrict the award of full severance benefits should
such employee subsequently be found not guilty of such charge or if the
charges are otherwise dismissed.
2. An employee who has been terminated or asked for a resignation by the
mayor or department director under bona fide charges of nonfeasance,
misfeasance or malfeasance in office.
3. An employee who fails to execute a Release of All Claims approved by the
city attorney’s office, where required as stipulated above.
4. An employee who is hired into another position in the city prior to their
separation date.
Page | 14
In the event an employee is hired into another position in the city after
their separation date and prior to the expiration of the period of time for
which the severance benefit was provided, the employee is required to
reimburse the City (on a pro-rata basis) for that portion of the severance
benefit covering the period of time between the date of rehire and the
expiration of the period of time for which the severance benefit was
provided.
SECTION IV: HOLIDAY, VACATION & LEAVE ACCRUAL
Benefits-eligible employees shall receive pay for holidays, vacation and other leave as provided
in this section. Employees do not earn or receive holiday and vacation benefits while on unpaid
leave of absence. However, employees on an unpaid military leave of absence may be entitled
to the restoration of such leave benefits, as required by applicable law.
SUBSECTION I – HOLIDAYS
A. The following days are recognized and observed as holidays for covered
employees. Eligible employees will receive pay for non-worked holidays equal
to their regular rate of pay times the total number of hours which make a
regularly scheduled shift. Except as otherwise noted in this subsection, an
employee may not bank a worked holiday.
1. New Year's Day, the first day of January.
2. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, the third Monday of January.
3. President's Day, the third Monday in February.
4. Memorial Day, the last Monday of May.
5. Independence Day, July 4.
6. Pioneer Day, July 24.
7. Labor Day, the first Monday in September.
8. Columbus Day, the second Monday of October (only for eligible employees
assigned to the Justice Court)
9. Veteran's Day, November 11.
10. Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November.
Page | 15
11. The Friday after Thanksgiving Day (excluding employees assigned to the
Justice Court)
12. Christmas Day, December 25.
13. One personal holiday per calendar year, taken upon request of an
employee and as approved by a supervisor.
B. When any holiday listed above falls on a Sunday, the following business day is
considered a holiday. When any holiday listed above falls on a Saturday, the
preceding business day is considered a holiday. In addition to the above, any day
may be designated as a holiday by proclamation of the mayor or the city council.
C. All holiday hours, including personal holidays, must be used in no less than
regular full day or shift increments.
1. A Fire battalion/division chief may be allowed to use a holiday in
less than a full shift increment only when converting from a
“support” to “operations” work schedule results in the creation of a
half-shift.
D. No employee will receive more than the equivalent of one workday or a regular
scheduled shift as holiday pay for a single holiday. Employees must either work
or be in an authorized paid leave status a working day before and a working day
after the holiday to qualify for holiday pay.
1. An employee who is off work and in a paid status covered by short-term
disability or parental leave receives regular pay as a benefit and,
therefore, is not entitled to bank a holiday while off work.
E. Holiday Exceptions: Except for employees assigned to the Justice Court, an
eligible employee may observe the Friday after Thanksgiving Day up to 50 days
prior to the actual holiday with prior management approval. For Columbus Day,
which is limited only to employees assigned to the Justice Court, an employee
may observe the holiday up to 50 days following the actual holiday.
F. Police Sergeant, Lieutenant, & Captain Holiday Hours Worked: When a day
designated as a holiday falls on a scheduled work day, a Police sergeant,
lieutenant, or captain may elect to take the day off work, subject to the approval
of their supervisor, or receive their regular wages for such days worked and
designate an alternate day off work to celebrate the holiday. For a Police
sergeant whose assignment requires staffing on either the graveyard shift prior
to, or the day and afternoon shift on Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day, all
hours worked will be compensated at a rate of one-and-one-half (1 ½) times the
employee’s regular base wage rate.
Page | 16
G. Police Sergeant, Lieutenant, & Captain Accrued Holiday Leave Payout: Police
sergeants, lieutenants, and captains who retire or separate from city
employment for any reason shall be compensated for any holiday time accrued
and unused during the preceding 12 months. Employees will not be
compensated for any unused holiday time accrued before the 12 months
preceding the employee’s retirement or separation.
1. Any Police sergeant, lieutenant, or captain who is transferred or promoted
to a higher level position within the department, including Deputy Chief,
Assistant Chief, or Police Chief, or to a position in another city department
will be paid out at their current base pay rate for any holiday time accrued
and unused during the preceding 12 months.
SUBSECTION II - VACATION LEAVE
The city will pay eligible employees their regular salaries during vacation periods earned and
taken in accordance with the following provisions. Except as provided for expressly in either city
policy or this plan, vacation leave hours are ineligible to be cashed out or used to exceed the
total number of hours for which an employee is regularly compensated during a work week or a
pay period.
Vacation hours may be used on the first day of the pay period following the period in which
the vacation hours are accrued.
A. Full-Time employees and appointed employees (except for those noted in
paragraphs B and C of this subsection) accrue vacation leave based upon years of
city service as follows:
Years of Hours of Vacation
Accrued Per Bi-weekly
City Service Pay Period
0 to end of year 3 3.73
4 to end of year 6 4.42
7 to end of year 9 4.81
10 to end of year 12 5.54
13 to end of year 15 6.15
16 to end of year 19 6.77
20 or more 7.69
Page | 17
B. Department directors, the mayor’s chief of staff, the mayor’s chief administrative
officer, up t o two additional senior positions in the mayor’s office as specified by the
mayor, the executive director of the city council, and justice court judges will accrue
7.69 hours each bi-weekly pay period.
C. Fire battalion chiefs in the Operations division of the Fire department will
accrue vacation leave according to the following schedule:
Years of Accrued Hours of Vacation Per
City Service Pay Period
0 to end of year 3 5.54
4 to end of year 6 6.46
7 to end of year 9 7.38
10 to end of year 12 8.31
13 to end of year 14 9.23
15 to end of year 19 10.15
20 or more 11.54
D. For any plan year in which there are 27 pay periods, no vacation leave hours will be
awarded in the 27th pay period.
E. Years of city service are based on the most recent date the person became a full-time
salaried employee.
F. Full-time employees re-hired by the city are eligible to receive prior service
credit for previous full-time city employment and time worked with other public
jurisdictions without a break in service. Prior service credit is applicable for
vacation accrual, personal leave accrual, short-term disability benefits, layoff,
and awarding of employee service awards and service certificates only. Prior
service credit does not apply to longevity pay.
G. Full-time and appointed employees (except those listed in Paragraph B of this
subsection) may accumulate vacations, according to the length of their full-time
years of city Service, up to the following maximum limits:
Up to and including 9 years Up to 30 days/ 15 shifts/ 240 hours
After 9 years Up to 35 days/ 17.5 shifts/ 280 hours
Page | 18
After 14 years Up to 40 days/ 20 shifts/ 320 hours
For purposes of this subsection, "days" means "8-hour" days and “shifts” means
“24-hour” combat shifts.
H. Department directors and those included in Paragraph B of this subsection may
accumulate up to 320 hours of vacation without regard to their years of employment
with the city.
I. Any vacation accrued beyond the allowable maximums will be deemed forfeited
unless used before the end of the calendar year in which the hours are accrued.
However, in the case of an employee’s return from an unpaid military leave of
absence, leave hours may be restored according to requirements under applicable
law.
J. Vacation Payout at Termination : An employee separating from employment may not
exhaust more than 80 hours of any combination of accrued vacation, personal leave, or
banked (holiday or vacation) leave prior to their last day of employment. Employees
shall be paid at their base hourly rate for any unused accrued vacation leave time
following termination of employment, including retirement.
K. Vacation Allowance: As a recruiting incentive, the mayor or the city council may
provide a one-time allowance of up to 120 hours of vacation leave.
SUBSECTION III - SICK AND OTHER RELATED LEAVE OR PERSONAL LEAVE
Benefits in this section are for the purpose of income replacement for employees
during absence from work due to illness, accident or personal reasons. Some of
these absences may qualify under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA).
Although the city requires use of accrued paid leave prior to taking unpaid FMLA
leave, employees will be allowed to reserve up to 80 hours of non -lapsing leave as a
contingency for future use by submitting a written request to Human Resources.
Employees are not eligible to earn or receive leave benefits while on an unpaid leave
of absence.
However, employees on an unpaid military leave of absence may be entitled to the
restoration of such leave benefits, as provided by applicable law.
Employees hired on or after November 16, 1997 receive personal leave benefits
under Plan B. All other employees receive personal leave benefits pursuant to the
plan they participated in as of November 15, 1998. Employees hired before
November 16, 1997 shall receive personal leave benefits under Plan B if they
elected to do so during any city- established election period occurring in 1998 or
later.
Page | 19
A. Plan “A ”
1. Sick Leave
a. Sick leave is provided for full-time employees under Plan “A” as insurance
against loss of income when an employee is unable to perform assigned
duties because of illness or injury. The mayor may e stablish rules
governing the interfacing of sick leave and workers’ compensation benefits
and avoiding, to the extent allowable by law, duplicative payments.
b. Each full-time employee accrues sick leave at a rate of 4.62 hours per pay
period. For any plan year in which there are 27 pay periods, no sick leave
hours will be awarded in the 27th pay period. Authorized and unused sick
leave may be accumulated from year to year, subject to the limitations of
this plan.
1. Sick Leave Accrual for Fire Battalion Chiefs – Each covered employee
shall be entitled to 15 days of sick leave each calendar year, except for
members of the Operations division who shall be entitled to 7.5 shifts
of sick leave each calendar year. The City shall credit a covered
employee’s sick leave account in a lump sum (either 15 days or7.5
shifts) during the first month of each calendar year. Authorized and
unused sick leave may be accumulated from year to year subject to the
limitations of this plan.
c. Under this Plan “A,” Full-Time employees who have accumulated 240
hours of sick leave may choose to convert up to 64 hours of the sick leave
earned and unused during any given year to vacation. Any sick leave used
during the calendar year reduces the allowable conversion by an equal
amount.
1. Sick Leave Conversion for Fire Battalion Chiefs – Fire Battalion Chiefs
who have accumulated 15 shifts (for Operations employees), or 240
hours (for non-Operations employees) may choose to convert a
portion of the year sick leave grant from any given year to vacation, as
follows—
Number of Sick Leave Shifts Used
During Previous Calendar Year
(Operations Only)
Number of Sick Leave Shifts
Available for Conversion
(Operations Only)
No shifts used 5 shifts
One shift used 4 shifts
Two shifts used 3 shifts
Three shifts used 2 shifts
Four shifts used 1 shift
Five or more shifts used No shifts
Page | 20
Number of Sick Leave Shifts Used
During Previous Calendar Year
(Support Only)
Number of Sick Leave Shifts
Available for Conversion
(Support Only)
No days used 9 days
One day used 8 days
Two days used 7 days
Three days used 6 days
Four days used 5 days
Five or more days used 0 days
d. Conversion at the maximum allowable hours will be made unless the
employee elects otherwise. Any election by an employee for no
conversion, or to convert less than the maximum allowable sick leave
hours to vacation time, must be made by notifying the employee’s
department timekeeper or the city payroll administrator, in writing, not
later than the second pay period of the new calendar year (or the
November vacation draw for Fire Battalion Chiefs). Otherwise, the
opportunity to waive conversion or elect conversion other than the
maximum allowable amount will be deemed waived for that calendar
year. In no event may sick leave days be converted from other than the
current year's sick leave allocation.
e. Any sick leave hours, properly converted to vacation benefits as above
described, must be taken before any other vacation hours to which the
employee is entitled; however, in no event is an employee, upon the
employee’s separation from employment, entitled to any pay or
compensation for any sick leave converted to vacation. An employee
forfeits any sick leave converted to vacation remaining unused at the date
of separation from employment.
f. Sick Leave Benefits Upon Layoff. Employees who are subject to layoff
because of lack of work or lack of funds will be paid at 100% of their
hourly base wage rate as of the date of termination for each accumulated
unused sick leave hour.
2. Hospitalization Leave
a. Hospitalization leave is provided for full -time employees under Plan “A,” in
addition to sick leave authorized hereunder, as insuran ce against loss of
income when an employee is unable to perform assigned duties because of
scheduled surgical procedures, urgent medical treatment, or hospital
inpatient admission.
b. Employees are entitled to 30 days of hospitalization leave each calendar
year. Hospitalization leave does not accumulate from year to year.
Page | 21
Employees may not convert hospitalization leave to vacation or any other
leave, nor may they convert hospitalization leave to any additional benefit
at time of retirement.
c. Employees who are unable to perform their duties during a shift due to
preparations (such as fasting, rest, or ingestion of medicine), for a
scheduled surgical procedure, may report the absence from the affected
shift as hospitalization leave, with the prior approval of their division head
or supervisor.
d. An employee who must receive urgent medical treatment at a hospital,
emergency room, or acute care facility, and who is regularly scheduled for
work or unable to perform their duties during a shift (or work day) due to
urgent medical treatment, may re port the absence from the affected shift
as hospitalization leave. Similarly, an employee who is absent from work
while on approved leave is also allowed to claim hospitalization leave.
1. An employee who wishes to claim hospitalization leave is responsible to
report the receipt of urgent medical treatment to the employee’s
division head or supervisor as soon as practical.
2. For purposes of use of hospitalization leave, urgent medical treatment
includes at-home care directed by a physician immediately after the
urgent medical treatment and within the affected shift.
e. Employees who, because they are admitted as an inpatient to a hospital
for medical treatment, are unable to perform their duties, may report
the absence from duty while in the hospital as hospitalization leave.
f. Medical treatment consisting exclusively or primarily of post -injury
rehabilitation or therapy treatment, whether conducted in a hospital or
other medical facility, shall not be counted as hospitalization leave.
g. An employee requesting hospitalization leave under this section may be
required to provide verification of treatment or care from a competent
medical practitioner.
3. Dependent Leave
a. Under Plan “A,” dependent leave may be requested by a full-time
employee for the following reasons:
1. Becoming a parent through birth or adoption of a child.
2. Placement of a foster child in the employee’s home.
Page | 22
3. Due to the care of the employee’s child, spouse, spouse’s child, adult
designee, adult designee’s unmarried child under age 26, or parent
with a serious health condition.
b. Under Plan “A,” dependent leave may also be requested by a full-time
employee to care for an employee’s child, spouse, spouse’s child, adult
designee, an adult designee’s unmarried child under age 26, or a parent
who is ill or injured but who does not have a serious health condition.
c. The following provisions apply to the use of dependent leave by a full-
time employee:
1. Dependent leave may be granted with pay on a straight time basis.
2. If an employee has available unused sick leave, sick leave may be
used as dependent leave.
3. An employee is required to give notice of the need to take
dependent leave, including the expected duration of leave, to his or
her supervisor as soon as possible.
4. Upon request of a supervisor, an employee will be required to
provide a copy of a birth certificate or evidence of child placement
for adoption, or a letter from the attending physician in the event of
hospitalization, injury, or illness of a child, spouse, spouse’s child,
adult designee, adult designee’s child, or parent within five calendar
days following a return from leave.
5. An employee’s sick leave shall be reduced by the number of hours
taken by an employee as dependent leave.
4. Career Incentive Leave, Plan “A”
Full-Time employees, who have been in continuous full-time employment with
the city for more than 20 years, and who have accumulated to their credit 1500 or
more sick leave hours, may make a one-time election to convert up to 160 hours
of sick leave into 80 hours of paid Career Incentive Leave . Career Incentive Leave
must be taken prior to retirement. Sick leave hours converted to Career Incentive
Leave will not be eligible for a cash payout upon termination or retirement even
though the employee has unused Career Incentive Leave hours available. This
leave can be used for any reason. Requests for Career Incentive Leave must be
submitted in writing to the appropriate department director and be approved
subject to the department’s business needs (e.g., work schedules and workloads).
Page | 23
5. Retirement Benefit, Plan “A”
a. Employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the Utah State
Retirement System and who retire from the city will be paid at their base
hourly rate for 50% of their accumulated sick leave hours balance based
on the schedule below:
Retirement Month 50% sick leave will be:
January 1st – June 30th Contribution to 501(c)9 Health
Reimbursement Account Plan
(premium-only account) July 1st – December 31st Cash to retiree
B. Plan “B”
1. The benefit Plan Year of Plan “B” begins in each calendar year on the first day
of the pay-period that includes November 15. Under Plan “B,” paid personal
leave is provided for employees as insurance against loss of income when an
employee needs to be absent from work because of illness or injury, to care for
a dependent, or for any other emergency or personal reason. Where the leave
is not related to the employee’s own illness or disability —or an event that
qualifies under the FMLA—a personal leave request is subject to supervisory
approval based on the operational requirements of the city and any policies
regarding the use of such leave adopted by the department in which the
employee works. Personal leave hours may be used on the first day of the pay
period following the period in which the hours are earned.
2. Each full-time employee under Plan “B” is awarded personal leave hours
based on the following schedule:
Months of
Consecutive Hours of
City Service Personal Leave
Less than 6 40
Less than 24 60
24 or more 80
Employees hired during the plan year are provided paid personal leave on a
pro-rated basis.
3. Not later than October 31st of each calendar year, employees covered by Plan
“B” may elect, by notifying their department timekeeper or the city payroll
administrator in writing, to:
Page | 24
a. Convert any unused personal leave hours available at the end of the first
pay period of November to a lump sum payment equal to the following:
For each converted hour, the employee will be paid 50 percent of the
employee’s regular hourly base wage rate (not including acting pay) in
effect on the date of conversion. In no event will total pay hereunder
exceed 40 hours of pay (80 hours at 50%); or
b. Carryover to the next calendar year up to 80 unused personal leave hours;
or
c. Convert a portion of unused personal leave hours, to a lump sum payment
as provided in subparagraph (3)(a), above, and carry over a portion as
provided in subparagraph (3)(b), above.
4. Maximum Accrual. A maximum of 80 hours of personal leave may be carried
over to the next plan year. Any personal leave hours unused at the end of the
plan year in excess of 80 will be converted to a lump sum payment as provided
in subparagraph 3(a) above.
5. Termination Benefits. An employee separating from employment may not exhaust
more than 80 hours of any combination of accrued vacation, personal leave, or banked
(holiday or vacation) leave prior to their last day of employment. At termination of
employment for any reason, accumulated unused personal leave hours, minus
any adjustment necessary after calculating the “prorated amount,” shall be paid
to the employee at 50 percent of the regular hourly base wage rate (not
including acting pay) on the date of termination for each unused hour. For
purposes of this paragraph, “prorated amount” shall mean the amount of
personal leave credited at the beginning of the plan year, multiplied by the ratio
of the number of pay periods worked in the plan year (rounded to the end of the
pay period which includes the separation date) to 26 pay periods. If the
employee, at the time of separation, has used personal leave in excess of the
prorated amount, the value of the excess amount shall be reimbursed to the city
and may be deducted f rom the employee’s paycheck.
6. Conditions on Use of Personal Leave include:
a. Minimum use of personal leave, with supervisory approval, must be in no
less than quarter-hour increments.
b. Except in unforeseen circumstances, such as emergencies or the
employee’s inability to work due to illness or accident or an
unforeseen FMLA-qualifying event, an employee must provide their
supervisor with prior notice to allow time for the supervisor to make
arrangements necessary to cover the employee’s work.
c. For leave due to unforeseen circumstances, the employee must give their
Page | 25
supervisor as much prior notice as possible.
d. Except as provided for expressly in either city policy or this plan, personal
leave hours are ineligible to be cashed out or used to exceed the total
number of hours for which an employee is regularly compensated during
a work week or a pay period.
7. Career Enhancement Leave, Plan “B”: A full-time employee covered under this
Plan “B” is eligible, after 15 years of full-time service with the city, to be selected
to receive up to two weeks of career enhancement leave. This one -time leave
benefit could be used for formal training, informal course of study, job -related
travel, internship, mentoring or other activity that could be of benefit to the city
and the employee’s career development. Selected employees will receive their
full regular salary during the leave. Request for this leave must be submitted in
writing to the appropriate department head, stating the purpose of the request
and how the leave is intended to benefit the city. The request must be approved
by the department head and by the Human Resourc es director (who will review
the request to ensure compliance with these guidelines).
8. Retirement/Layoff (RL) Benefit, Plan “B”
a. Full-Time employees currently covered under Plan “B” who were hired
before November 16, 1997, and who elected to be covered under Plan
“B,” shall have a retirement/layoff (RL) account equal to sixty percent of
their accumulated unused sick leave hours available on November 16,
1997, minus any hours withdrawn from that account since it was
established.
b. Full-Time employees who were hired before November 16, 1997 and who
elected in 1998 to be covered under Plan “B,” shall have a
retirement/layoff (RL) account equal to fifty percent of their accumulated
unused sick leave hours available on November 14, 1998, minus any hours
withdrawn after the account is established.
c. Full-Time employees who were hired before November 16, 1997 and who
elected in 2007 or later during any period designated by the city to be
covered under Plan “B,” shall have a retirement /layoff (RL) account equal
to forty percent of their accumulated unused sick leave hours available on
the date that Plan B participation began, minus any hours withdrawn after
the account is established.
d. Payment of the RL Account .
1. All hours in an employee’s RL account shall be payable upon
retirement or as a result of layoff. In the case of layoff, 100% of R/L
hours shall be paid to the employee according to the employee’s base
Page | 26
hourly rate of pay on date of layoff. Any employee who quits, resigns,
is separated, or is terminated for cause is not eligible to receive
payment for RL account hours.
2. In cases of retirement, an eligible employee shall be paid at their base
hourly rate for 100% of their RL account balance based on the
schedule below:
Retirement Month 100% RL hours will be:
January 1st – June 30th Contribution to 501(c)9 Health Retirement
Account Plan
(premium-only account) July 1st – December 31st Cash to retiree
e. Hours may be withdrawn from the RL account to cover an employee’s
absence from work due to illness or injury, need to care for a dependent,
any emergency or to supplement Workers’ Compensation benefits after
personal leave hours are exhausted. RL account hours, when added to
the employee’s workers’ compensation benefit, may not exceed the
employee’s regular net salary.
9. Short-Term Disability Insurance, Plan “B”: Protection against loss of income
when an employee is absent from work due to short-term disability shall be
provided to full-time employees covered under Plan “B” through short-term
disability insurance (SDI). There shall be no cost to the employee for SDI. SDI
shall be administered in accordance with the terms determined by the city.
SUBSECTION IV - PARENTAL LEAVE
A. Full-time employees who become parents through birth, adoption, or foster care may
take up to six consecutive weeks of paid parental leave to care for and bond with the
child. An employee may be allowed to take parental leave up to one year from the
date of a child’s birth or, in the case of adoption or foster care, the date a child is
placed in the employee’s home. Parental leave may be taken during a new
employee’s probationary period. The probationary period will be extended by an
amount of time equivalent to the parental leave taken.
B. Parental leave will run concurrently (during the same period of time) with FMLA and
SDI (if applicable). Parental leave is limited to six weeks per twelve-month period. For
employees approved for short-term disability, parental leave will make up the
difference between 100% pay and 66 2/3% pay (if applicable) for up to six weeks.
SUBSECTION V - BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
A. An employee who suffers the loss of an immediate family member including a(n):
current spouse, domestic partner, or adult designee; child, mother, father, brother,
Page | 27
sister; current father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-
law, sister-in-law; grandparent; current step-grandfather, step-grandmother;
grandchild, or current step grandchild, stepchild, stepmoth er, stepfather,
stepbrother or stepsister, grandfather-in-law, grandmother-in-law; or, domestic
partner’s or adult designee’s relative as if the domestic partner or adult designee
were the employee’s spouse is eligible to be released from work for bereavement,
including attendance at a funeral, memorial service, or related event(s).
B. In the event of death of an immediate family member, the city will provide an
employee with up to five working days of paid leave for bereavement, including
attendance at a funeral, memorial service, or related event(s). The employee will be
permitted one additional day of bereavement leave if the employee attends a
funeral, memorial service or equivalent event that is held more than 150 miles from
Salt Lake City and the day following the memorial service or equivalent event is a
regular working shift.
C. In the event of death of a first-line extended relative of an employee, or of an
employee’s spouse, domestic partner, or adult designee’s relative as if the adult
designee were the employee’s spouse not covered in paragraph A above (such as an
uncle, aunt or cousin), the city will provide an employee with up to one work shift
for bereavement, including attendance at a funeral, memorial service, or related
event(s). The employee will be permitted one additional day of bereavement leave if
the employee attends a funeral, memorial service or equivalent event that is held
more than 150 miles from Salt Lake City and the day following the memorial service
or equivalent event is a regular working shift.
D. In the event of death of a friend, an employee may be allowed to use vacation or
personal leave for time off to attend the funeral or memorial service, as
approved by an immediate supervisor.
E. In the event of death of any covered family member while an employee is on
vacation leave, an employee’s absence may be extended and authorized as
bereavement leave.
SUBSECTION VI - MILITARY LEAVE
A. Leave of absence for employees who enter uniformed service. An employee who
enters the uniformed services of the United States, including the United States Army,
United States Navy, United States Marin e Corps, United States Air Force,
commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
United States Coast Guard, or the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service,
is entitled to be absent from his or her duties and service from the city, without pay,
as required by applicable l law. Leave will be granted in accordance with the
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).
Page | 28
B. Leave while on duty with the armed forces or Utah National Guard. An employee
who is or who becomes a member of the reserves of the federal armed forces,
including the United States Army, United States Navy, United States Marine Corps,
United States Air Force, and the United States Coast Guard, or any unit of the Utah
National Guard, is allowed military leave for up to 15 working days per calendar
year for time spent on active or reserve duty. Military leave may be in addition to
vacation leave and need not be consecutive days of service. To be covered, an
employee must provide documentation demonstrating a duty requirement.
SUBSECTION VII - JURY LEAVE & COURT APPEARANCES
A. Jury Leave: An employee will be released from duty with full pay when, in obedience
to a subpoena or direction by proper authority, the employee is required to either
serve on a jury or appear as a witness for the United States, the state of Utah, or
other political subdivision.
1. Employees are entitled to retain statutory fees paid for service in a federal
court, state court, or city/county justice court.
2. On any day that an employee is required to report for service and is
thereafter excused from such service during his or her regular working
hours from the city, he or she must forthwith return to and carry on his
or her regular city employment. Employees who fail to return to work
after being excused from service for the day are subject to discipline.
B. Court Appearances. A Police sergeant is eligible to receive compensation as a
witness subpoenaed by the city, the State of Utah, or the United States for a court
or administrative proceeding appearance as follows:
1. Appearances in court or administrative proceeding made while on-duty will
be compensated as normal hours worked.
2. In the event an appearance extends beyond the end of an employee's
regularly scheduled shift, time will be counted as normal work time for the
purpose of computing an employee's overtime compensation.
3. Employees are entitled to retain statutory witness fees paid for service in a
federal court, state court, or city/county justice court.
4. Appearances made while off -duty will be compensated as follows:
(a) The city will pay employees for two hours of preparation time
plus actual time spent in court or in an administrative hearing
at one and one-half times their regular hourly rate. Lunch
periods granted are not considered compensable time.
Compensation for additional preparation time for any
Page | 29
subsequent appearance during the same day is allowed only
when there is at least two hours between the employee’s
release time from a prior court or administrative proceeding
and the start of the other.
(b) If the time spent in court or administrative proceeding
extends into the beginning of the employee's regularly
scheduled work shift, time spent in court or in administrative
proceeding will be deemed ended at the time such shift is
scheduled to begin.
5. An employee is required to provide a copy of the subpoena, including the
beginning time and time released from the court or administrative hearing,
with initials of the prosecuting or another court representative within seven
working days following the appearance.
6. Any employee failing to appear in compliance with the terms of a formal
notice or subpoena may be subject to disciplinary action.
SUBSECTION VIII - INJURY LEAVE (SWORN POLICE AND FIRE EMPLOYEES ONLY)
The city has established rules governing the administration of an injury leave program for sworn
police officers and firefighters under the following qualifications and restrictions:
A. The disability must have resulted from an injury arising out of the discharge of
official duties or while exercising some form of necessary job-related activity as
determined by the city;
B. The employee must be unable to return to work due to the injury, as verified by a
medical provider acceptable to the city;
C. The leave benefit may not exceed the value of the employee's net sala ry during the
period of absence due to the injury, less all amounts paid or credited to the
employee as workers’ compensation, Social Security, long-term disability or
retirement benefits, or any form of governmental relief whatsoever;
D. The value of benefits provided to employees under this injury leave program may
not exceed the total of $5,000 per employee per injury, unless approved in writing
by the employee’s department head after receiving an acceptable treatment plan
and consulting with the city’s risk manager;
E. The city's risk manager is principally responsible for the review of injury leave
claims, except that appeals from the decision of the city’s risk manager may be
reviewed by the Human Resources director, who may make recommendations to
the mayor for final decisions;
Page | 30
F. If an employee is eligible for workers’ compensation as provided by law and is not
receiving injury leave pursuant to this provision, an employee may elect to use
either accumulated sick leave or hours from the RL account, if applicable, and
authorized vacation time to supplement workers’ compensation. The total value of
leave hours or hours from an RL account combined with a workers’ compensation
benefit may not exceed an employee's regular net salary.
SUBSECTION IX - ADDITIONAL LEAVES OF ABSENCE
Additional leaves of absence may be requested in writing and granted as identified in policy to
an employee at the discretion of a department director.
SUBSECTION X - EMERGENCY LEAVE
The city may provide additional paid leave to employees if: i) the mayor has declared a local
emergency; and ii) the mayor and/or city council authorize and approve the use of available
funds for such purposes during the period of local emer gency.
Emergency leave may also be provided as a form of income replacement for part -time
(hourly) and/or seasonal employees whose work hours are either reduced or discontinued
temporarily, so long as there is an expectation they will return to work aft er the emergency
period is ended.
APPENDIX A - SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
GENERAL EMPLOYEE PAY PLAN (GEPP)
Effective June 27, 2021
GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM
SEAX/HRLY $10.87 $35.00
10 $11.66 $15.22 $18.79
11 $12.22 $15.99 $19.75
12 $12.84 $16.93 $21.00
13 $13.48 $17.63 $21.78
14 $14.15 $18.44 $22.74
15 $14.86 $19.52 $24.17
16 $15.59 $20.66 $25.71
17 $16.38 $21.49 $26.60
18 $17.20 $22.85 $28.48
19 $18.06 $23.87 $29.65
20 $18.97 $24.88 $30.77
21 $19.14 $26.10 $33.07
22 $20.11 $27.43 $34.74
23 $21.12 $28.81 $36.50
24 $22.17 $30.23 $38.30
25 $23.27 $31.73 $40.21
26 $24.44 $33.34 $42.23
27 $25.65 $35.01 $44.37
28 $26.93 $36.78 $46.63
29 $28.29 $38.62 $48.95
30 $29.70 $40.55 $51.41
31 $31.19 $42.59 $53.98
32 $32.74 $44.71 $56.67
33 $34.39 $46.95 $59.52
34 $36.11 $49.30 $62.50
35 $37.91 $51.76 $65.62
36 $39.80 $54.35 $68.90
37 $41.79 $57.07 $72.34
38 $43.88 $59.92 $75.95
39 $46.09 -$96.79
40 $48.38 -$101.61
41 $50.80 -$164.83
APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT
Effective June 27, 2021
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT ENGINEERING 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL SERVICES 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 033X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR – CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER) 037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER) 035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 033X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
TRANSITION CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
TRANSITION COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
TRANSITION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X*
INFORMATION MGT SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 037X
CITY COURTS ADMINISTRATOR 033X
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR 024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POLICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
PUBLIC LANDS
PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PUBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be
added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member -elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake
City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for
city council members-elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees.
APPENDIX C – ELECTED OFFICIALS SALARY SCHEDULE
Annual Salaries
Effective June 27, 2021
.
Mayor $148,034
Council Members $37,017
Except for leave time, benefits for the mayor and city council members are equivalent to those
provided to full-time employees.
APPENDIX D- U TAH STATE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FY 2021-2022
Tier 1 Defined Benefit System
System Employee
Contribution Employer Contribution Total
Public Employees Contributory System 6.0% 14.46% 20.46%
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0 18.47% 18.47%
Public Safety Noncontributory System 0 46.71% 46.71%
Firefighters Retirement System 0 23.95% 23.95%
Tier 1 Post Retired
System
Post Retired Employment
After 6/30/10 – NO 401(k)
Amortization of UAAL*
Post Retired Employment Before
7/1/2010
Optional 401(k)
Public Employees Noncontributory System
6.61%
11.86%
Public Safety Noncontributory System 24.20% 22.51%
Firefighters Retirement System 0% n/a
Tier 2 Defined Benefit Hybrid System
Employee
Contribution
Employer
Contribution
401(k) Total
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0% 15.80% 0.89% 16.69%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for entry and two year pay steps only) 2.27% (city paid) 38.28% 6.00% 46.55%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for pay steps year four or more) 2.27% (city paid) 38.28% 0% 40.55%
Firefighters Retirement System 2.27% (city paid) 14.08% 0% 16.35%
Tier 2 Defined Contribution Only
Employee
Contribution
Employer
Contribution
401(k) Total
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0% 6.69% 10.00% 16.69%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for entry and two year pay steps only)
0% 24.28% 22.27% 46.55%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for pay steps year four or more)
0% 24.28% 16.27% 40.55%
Firefighters Retirement System 0% 0.08% 16.27% 16.35%
Executive Non-Legislative
Position Employer Contribution
Public Employees Noncontributory System
Department Heads, Mayor,
Mayor’s Chief of Staff, Chief
Administrative Officer, Up to Two
Additional Senior Executives in
the Mayor’s Office, Executive
Director for City Council
Normal contribution into Utah Retirement
System (URS)with 3% into 401(k)
– OR –
If Tier 1 and exempt from system or Tier II
and exempt from vesting, 401k contribution
equal to the applicable URS system
contribution plus 3%
Public Safety Noncontributory System Department Head Same as above
Firefighters Retirement System Department Head Same as above
Council Members Elected with prior service in the Utah Retirement System
(Tier 1 Defined Benefit)
System Employee
Contribution Employer Contribution Total
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0 18.47% 18.47%
If exempt… 0 10% base salary to 401(k) 10%
Council Members Elected After July 1, 2011 with no prior service in the Utah Retirement System (may
exempt from vesting)
Tier 2 Defined Contribution Only
Employer 401K Total
6.69% 10% 16.69%
Tier 2 Defined Benefit Hybrid System
Employer 401K Total
15.80% 0.89% 16.69%
ANNUAL
COMPENSATION PLAN
for Non-Represented
Employees
FY2021
FY2022
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Page | 1
FY 2021 2022 COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-REPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES of SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this plan shall be effective commencing June 28, 2020June 27, 2021, unless
otherwise noted.
EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THIS PLAN
This plan applies to all full-time city employees. This plan does not apply to employees
classified as: seasonal, hourly, temporary, part -time or those covered by a memorandum
of understanding.
AUTHORITY OF THE MAYOR
Employees covered by this compensation plan may be appointed, classified, and advanced
under rules and regulations promulgated by the mayor, or the Civil Service Commission, if
applicable, within budget limitations established by the city council.
Furthermore, the mayor may authorize leave not specified in this compensation plan to
provide for operational flexibility, so long as the additional leave does not exceed the
equivalent of eight hours of leave per employee, per year. However, with the exception of
a benefit created or expanded pursuant to Section IV, Subsection X (“Emergency Leave”),
the mayor may not otherwise create a new benefit or expand an existing benefit for
employees covered by this compensation plan if doing so will result in a direct,
measurable cost. A direct, measurable cost includes a circumstance where the total cost
of the new benefit or expansion of an existing benefit exceeds appropriated funds.
Further, city council input and approval is required if the creation of a new benefit has
policy implications or is already addressed in this compensation plan.
APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
All provisions in this compensation plan are subject to the appropriation of funds by the city
council.
MODIFICATION, SUSPENSION, OR REVOCATION OF PROVISIONS
If a local emergency is declared, any provision in this compensation plan may be temporarily
modified, suspended, or revoked for the duration (or any portion thereof) of the period of local
emergency, if so authorized by the mayor and/or city council .
Page | 2
SECTION I: DEFINITIONS
SUBSECTION I - DEFINITION OF TERMS
As used in this compensation plan:
1. “Appointed employees,” with the exception of justice court judges who are
covered under this plan, means employees who are "at-will" employees serving
at the pleasure of the mayor (or the city council if they are employees of the
Office of the City Council).
2. “Adult Designee” means any individual with whom an employee has a long-term,
committed relationship of mutual caring and support. The adult designee must
have resided in the same household with the eligible employee for at least the
past 12 consecutive months and must have common financial obligations with
the employee. The adult designee and the employee must be jointly responsible
for each other’s welfare.
3. "Exempt” refers to any employee who is not eligible to receive
compensation for overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
4. “FLSA” means the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
5. “Full-time employee” means employees whose positions regularly require more
than 30 hours per week on a full-time schedule.
6. "Non-Exempt” refers to an employee who is entitled to receive overtime
compensation pursuant to the FLSA.
SECTION II: EMPLOYEE WAGES, SALARIES & BENEFITS
SUBSECTION I - COMPENSATION PROGRAM & SALARY SCHEDULES
The city’s compensation system and program, in conjunction with this plan , is intended to
attract, motivate and retain qualified personnel necessary to effectively meet public service
demands.
A. Determination
1. The mayor shall develop policies and guidelines for the administration of the
pay plans.
2. To the degree that funds permit, employees shall be paid com pensation that:
a. Is commensurate with the skills and abilities required of the position;
Page | 3
b. Achieves equal pay for equal work;
c. Attains comparability and is competitive with the compensation paid by
other public and/or private employers with whom the city compares
and/or competes for personnel recruitment and retention. The city shall
consider itself competitive when data indicates actual median employee
pay rates plus the overall additional economic value of benefits equals
at least 100% compared to market.
3. To the extent possible, market surveys shall be used to assess and evaluate the
city’s competitiveness with a cross section of organizations with whom the city
competes for personnel recruitment and retention. This may include one or
more of the following:
a. Compensation surveys, including actual pay and other cash allowances paid
to employees.
b. Benefits surveys, including paid leave, group insurance plans, retirement, and
other employer-provided and voluntary benefits.
c. Regular review of the city’s compensation plans and pay structures to
ensure salary ranges and regular pay practices provide for job growth and
encourage employee productivity.
B. Salary Schedules
1. All Employees covered under this plan (except for those designated as “Elected
Officials”) shall be paid base wages or salaries according to the General Employee
Pay Plan attached as Appendix “A.” Wages and salaries shall not be less than the
established range minimum or higher than the range maximum, unless otherwise
approved by the mayor or mayor’s designee.
2. Appointed Employees: The specific pay level assignments for Appointed
Employees are shown in Appendix “B.”
3. Elected Officials: Elected officials shall be paid annual compensation according
to schedule attached as Appendix "C."
C. Other Compensation
The mayor or the city council may distribute appropriated monies to city employees
as discretionary retention incentives or retirement contributions; or special lump
sum supplemental payments. Retention incentives or special lump sum payments
are subject to the mayor’s or city council’s approval.
Page | 4
SUBSECTION II - EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 20212022
For employees covered under this plan, the city will maintain increase each employee’s base pay
without an increaseby one percent. Salaries for elected officials will, also, be maintained without
an increased by one percent.
The city’s living wage for regular, full-time employees is set and shall be no less than $10.8715.11
per hour.
SUBSECTION III - EMPLOYEE INSURANCE
The city will make available group medical, health and flex savings plans, dental, life,
accidental death & dismemberment, long-term disability insurance, voluntary benefits and
an employee assistance program (EAP) to all eligible employees and their eligible spouse,
adult designee, dependents and dependents of adult designee pursuant to city policy.
A. Employer-Paid Contributions. Effective July 1, 20202021, the city’s contribution
toward the total premium for group medical will be 95% for the high-deductible
Summit Star Plan. For employees enrolled in the high-deductible Summit Star Plan,
the city will also contribute a one-time total of $750 into a qualified health savings
account (HSA) or a Medical Flex Account for those enrolled for single coverage and
$1,500 for those enrolled for double or family coverage per plan year. Health
savings account or Medical Flex account contributions will be pro-rated for any
employee hired after July 1, 20202021.
B. 501(c) (9) Post Employment Health Reimbursement Account. The city will contribute
$24.30 per bi-weekly pay period into each employee’s Educators Benefits Consultants
(EBC) Post Employment Health Reimbursement Account. For any year in which there
are 27 pay periods, no such contribution will be made in the 27th pay period.
SUBSECTION IV - WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
The city will provide workers’ compensation coverage to employees as required by applicable
law.
SUBSECTION V - SOCIAL SECURITY EXCEPTION FOR POLICE & FIRE
All sworn employees in the Police and Fire departments covered under this plan are exempt from
the provisions of the federal Social Security System unless determined otherwise by the city or
required by applicable law.
SUBSECTION VI - RETIREMENT
A. Retirement Programs. The city hereby adopts the Utah State Retirement System for
providing retirement benefits to employees covered by the plan. The city may permit
or require the participation of employees in its retiremen t program(s) under terms
Page | 5
and conditions established by the mayor and consistent with applicable law. Such
programs may include:
1. The Utah State Public Employees (Contributory and Non-Contributory); Public
Safety Retirement Systems; or, the Utah Firefighters Retirement System; or,
2. Deferred compensation programs.
B. The 2020-20212021-2022 fiscal year retirement contribution rates for employees,
including elected officials, are shown in Appendix “D.”
SECTION III: WORK HOURS, OVERTIME & OTHER PAY ALLOWANCES
SUBSECTION I – WORK HOURS
A. The city’s standard work week begins Sunday at 12:00am and ends the following
Saturday at 11:59pm. Alternatives to the standard work week may be authorized and
adopted for specific work groups, such as:
1. The standard work schedule for combat Fire Battalion Chiefs, which includes
two consecutive 24-hour shifts immediately followed by 96 hours off.
A work week beginning Sunday at 7:00am and ending the following Sunday at
6:59am, as in the case of Police Sergeants and Lieutenants.
SUBSECTION II- OVERTIME COMPENSATION
A. Overtime Compensation. The city will pay non-exempt employees overtime
compensation as required by the FLSA. The city will pay overtime hours at 1 ½ times
the employee’s regular hourly rate or, at the employee’s request and with their
department director’s approval, provide compensatory time off at a rate of 1½
hours for each overtime hour in lieu of overtime compensation.
1. Employees may accrue compensatory time up to a maximum amount as
determined by their department director.
2. The city may elect at any time to pay an employee for any or all accrued
compensatory hours.
3. The city will includ e only actual hours worked and holiday leave hours when
calculating overtime.
4. When used, personal leave and compensatory time will not be included in the
calculation of overtime.
Page | 6
5. The city will pay out all accrued compensatory hours whenever an employee’s
status or position changes from FLSA non-exempt to exempt.
B. Labor Costs— Declared Emergency— Overtime Compensation for FLSA Exempt
Employees. The city may pay exempt employees overtime pay for any hours
worked over forty (40) hours in a workweek at a rate equivalent to their regular
base hourly rate of pay during periods of emergency. The city shall only make such
payment when all of the following conditions occur:
1. The mayor or the city council has issued a “Proclamation of Local Emergency”
or the city responds to an extraordinary emergency; and,
2. Exempt employees are required to work over forty (40) hours for one or more
workweek(s) during the emergency period: and,
3. The mayor and/or the city council approve the use of available funds to cover
the overtime payments.
The city shall distribute any overtime payments consistently with a pre -defined
standard that treats all exempt employees equitably. Hours worked under a
declared or extraordinary emergency must be paid hours and cannot be accrued as
compensatory time.
SUBSECTION III - LONGEVITY PAY
A. Eligibility. With the exception of elected officials, the city will pay a monthly
longevity benefit to full-time employees based on the most recent date an employee
began full -time employment as follows:
1. Employees who have completed six (6) consecutive years of employment
with the city will receive $50;
2. Employees who have completed ten (10) consecutive years of employment
with the city will receive $75;
3. Employees who have completed sixteen (16) full years of employment wit h
the city will receive $100; and,
4. Employees who have completed twenty (20) full years of employment with
the city will receive $125.
Page | 7
B. Pension Base Pay. Longevity pay will be included in base pay for purposes of
pension contributions.
C. Longevity While on an Unpaid Leave of Absence. Employees do not earn or
receive longevity payments while on an unpaid leave of absence. When an
employee returns from an approved unpaid leave of absence, longevity
payments will resume.
SUBSECTION IV - WAGE DIFFERENTIALS & ADDITIONAL PAY
Eligible employees receive certain wage differentials as follows:
A. Call Back and Call Out Pay. Non-exempt employees will be paid Call Back or Call Out
pay based upon department director approval and the following guidelines:
1. Call Back Pay: Non-sworn, non-exempt employees who have been released
from normally scheduled work and standby periods, and who are directed
by an appropriate department head or designated representative to return
to work prior to their next scheduled normal duty shift, will be paid for a
minimum of three (3) hours straight-time pay and, in addition, will be
guaranteed a minimum four (4) hours work at straight-time pay.
2. Call Out Pay for Police Sergeants. Sergeants who have been released from
their scheduled work shifts and have been directed by an appropriate
division head or designated representative to perform work without at
least 24 hours advance notice or scheduling, shall be compensated as
follows:
a. Sergeants who are directed to report to work shall receive a
minimum of four (4) hours compensation at one and one-half times
their hourly wage rate, or one and one-half times their hourly wage
rate for actual hours worked, whichever is greater.
b. Sergeants who are assigned to day shift, and who are directed to
perform work within eight (8) hours prior to the beginning of their
regularly scheduled shift shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours
compensation at one and one-half times their hourly wage rate, or
one and one-half times their hourly wage rate for actual hours
worked, whichever is greater.
c. Sergeants who are assigned to afternoon or grave yard shifts, and who
are directed to perform work within eight (8) hours following the end
of their regularly scheduled shift shall receive a minimum of four (4)
hours compensation at one and one-half times their hourly wage rate,
or one and one-half times their hourly wage rate for actual
Page | 8
hours worked, whichever is greater.
B. Standby Pay : Non-exempt employees are eligible to receive Standby pay based
upon the following guidelines.
1. Standby for Non-Sworn Employees: Non-exempt, non-sworn employees
who have been released from normally scheduled work but have not
been released from standby status will be paid either two (2) hours of
straight time pay for each 24 hour period of limited standby status; or
two (2) hours straight time pay for each 12-hour period of standby status
if they are Department of Airports or Public Utilities Department
employees.
a. First Call to Work. An eligible employee who is directed to return to
his or her normal work site during an assigned Standby period by a
department head or designated representative without advanced
notice or scheduling will be paid a guaranteed minimum of four (4)
hours, which may include any combination of hours worked and/or
non-worked straight-time pay.
b. Additional Calls to Work. An eligible employee will be paid an
additional guaranteed minimum of two (2) hours, which may include
any combination of hours worked and/or non-worked straight-time
pay, for each additional occasion he or she is called to work during
the same twenty-four (24) or twelve (12) hour standby period.
c. Exclusion for Snow Fighters. Any employee on standby as a member
of the Snow Fighter Corps shall not receive standby/on-call pay or
shift differential when on standby or called back to fight snow.
2. Standby for Police Sergeants: Police Sergeants directed by their division
commander or designee to keep themselves available for city service
during otherwise off-duty hours shall be compensated one half hour (30
minutes) two (2) hours of straight time for each 12-hour period of
standby status twelve (12) hours while on a designated Standby status.
This compensation shall be in addition to any callout pay or pay for time
worked the employee may receive during the standby period.
C. Extra-Duty Shifts for Police Sergeants. "Extra-duty shifts" are defined as scheduled or
unscheduled hours worked other than the sergeant's normally scheduled work shifts.
"Extra-duty shifts" do not include extension or carry over of the sergeant's normally
scheduled work shift.
1. Any sergeant required by the city to work extra-duty shifts shall receive
a minimum of three (3) hours compensation at one and one-half times
their regular base hourly rate, or time worked paid at one and one-half
Page | 9
times their regular hourly base wage rate, whichever is greater.
D. Shift Allowance, not including Police Sergeants & Lieutenants. Only non- exempt
employees who perform afternoon/ swing or evening shift work are eligible to
receive a shift allowance.
1. The city will include all shift allowance when computing overtime. An
employee who receives Snow Fighter Corps differential pay is not eligible to
also receive shift allowance.
2. Day Shift: No allowance will be paid for work hours which are part of a
regular day shift.
3. Eligible Hours: For each non-day shift hour worked between the hours of
6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., the city will pay an eligible non-exempt
employee a differential of $1.00 per hour.
E. Shift Differential for Police Sergeants & Lieutenants: The city will pay Police sergeants
& lieutenants shift differentials according to the shift actually worked. Actual shift
differential rates are determined as follows:
1. Day Shift: No differential pay for hours worked during day shift, which begins
at 0500 hours until 1159 hours.
2. Swing Shift: A differential of 2.5% in addition to the regular day rate shall be
paid for swing shift, which begins at 1200 hours until 1859 hours.
3. Graveyard Shift: A differential of 5.0% in addition to the regular day rate
shall be paid for graveyard shift, which begins at 1900 hours until 0459
hours.
F. Acting/Working out of Classification. A department head may elect to grant
additional compensation to an employee for work performed on a temporary basis,
whether in an acting capacity or otherwise, beyond the employee’s regular job
classification for any period lasting 20 or more working days. Unless approved by the
mayor or mayor’s designee, acting pay shall be limited to no more than 90 calendar
days from the start date and paid separately from regular earnings on each
employee’s wage statement. Compensation adjustments may be retroactive to the
start date of the temporary job assignmen t. Exceptions may be approved by the
mayor or mayor’s designee.
1. Acting pay shall be excluded when calculating any leave payouts,
including vacation, holiday, and personal leave.
Page | 10
G. Snowfighter Pay. The city will pay employees designated by the department head,
or designee, as members of the Snow Fighter Corps a pay differential equal to $200
per pay period for the snowfighter season not to exceed $2,000 during each fiscal
year for work related to snow removal. This pay shall be separate from regular
earnings on each employee’s wage statement.
SUBSECTION V - EDUCATION AND TRAINING PAY
A. Education Incentives. The mayor may adopt programs to promote employee
education and training, provided that all compensation incentives are authorized
within appropriate budget limitations established by the city council.
1. Police Sergeants, Lieutenants, and Captains are eligible for a $500 per
year job-related training allowance.
2. Fire Battalion/Division Chiefs are eligible for incentive pay following
completion of degree requirements at a fully accredited college or
university and submission of evidence of a diploma to Human Resources.
The city will pay monthly allowances according to the educational degree
held, as follows:
Doctorate………….. $100.00
Masters………..…... $75.00
Bachelors……...…... $50.00
Associate………….. $35.00
a. Eligibility for this pay allowance ends when the department implements
approved changes to the minimum requirements for promotion to
Battalion/Division Chief by requiring a degree, as anticipated during the fall
of 2020.
SUBSECTION VI – OTHER PAY ALLOWANCES
A. Meal Allowance. When approved by management, employees may receive meal
allowances in the amount of $10.00 when an employee works two or more hours
consecutive to their normally scheduled shift. Employees may also be eligible to
receive $10.00 for each additional four-hour consecutive period of work which is in
addition to the normally scheduled work shift.
1. Fire and police department employees shall be provided with adequate
food and drink to maintain safety and performance during emergencies
or extraordinary circumstances.
B. Business Expenses. City policy shall govern the authorization of employee
advancement or reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably incurred while
Page | 11
performing city business. Advance payment or reimbursement for expenses shall
be approved only when the amounts are documented and within the budget
limitations established by the city council.
C. Automobiles
1. The mayor may authorize, subject to the conditions provided in city
policy, an employee to utilize a city vehicle on a take-home basis and
may require an employee to reimburse the city for a portion of the
take -home vehicle cost as provided in city ordinance.
2. Employees who are authorized to use privately-owned automobiles for
official city business will be reimbursed for the operation expenses at the
rate specif ied in city policy.
3. The city will provide a car allowance to department directors, the mayor’s
chief of staff, the mayor’s chief administrative officer, up to three additional
employees in the mayor’s office, and the city council Executive Director at
a rate not to exceed $400 per month A car allowance may be paid to
specific appointed employees at a rate not to exceed $400 per month as
recommended by the mayor and approved by the city council.
D. Uniform Allowance. The city will provide employees who are required to wear
uniforms in the performance of their duties a monthly uniform allowance as
follows:
1. Parking Enforcement Field Supervisor—$65.00
2. Non-sworn Police and Fire Department
employees—$65.00
3. Watershed Management Division
employees—$65.00
4. Fire: Battalion Chiefs will be provided uniforms and other job-related
safety equipment, as needed. Employees may select uniforms and
related equipment from an approved list. The total allowance provided
shall be $600 per year, or the amount received by firefighter employees,
whichever is greater. Appointed employees shall be provided uniforms
or uniform allowances to the extent stated in Fire department policy.
a. Dangerous or contaminated safety equipment shall be cleaned,
repaired, or replaced by the Fire department.
5. Police: Police sergeants, lieutenants, and captains in uniform
Page | 12
assignments, as determined by their bureau commander, will be
enrolled in the department’s quartermaster system.
a. The quartermaster system will operate as follows:
i. Necessary uniform and equipment items, including patrol
uniforms, detective uniforms, duty gear, footwear, cold-
weather gear, headwear, etc. will be provided to Police
sergeants, lieutenants, and captains by the department’s
quartermaster pursuant to department policy.
ii. A full inventory of items that the quartermaster will
provide to Police sergeants, lieutenants and captains within
the quartermaster system and the manner in which they
will be distributed will be stated in department
policy.
iii. Police sergeants, lieutenants and captains in the
quartermaster system will be paid the sum of One
Hundred Dollars ($100) each fiscal year for the purpose of
independently purchasing any incidental uniform item or
equipment not provided by the quartermaster system.
Payment will be made each year on the first day of the
pay-period that includes August 15.
b. The city will provide for the cleaning of uniforms as described in
Police department policy.
c. Police sergeants, lieutenants, and captains in plainclothes
assignments, as determined by their bureau commander, are
provided a clothing and cleaning allowance totaling $39.00 per pay
period. Sergeants, lieutenants, and captains who are transferred
back to a uniform assignment will return to the quartermaster
system upon transfer.
d. Uniforms or uniform allowances for appointed Police employees will
be provided to the extent stated in Police department policy.
E. Allowances for Certified Golf Teaching Professionals. The mayor may, within
budgeted appropriations and as business needs indicate, authorize golf lesson
revenue sharing between the city and employees recognized as Certified Golf
Teaching Professionals as defined in the Golf Division’s Golf Lesson Revenue
Policy. Payment to an employee for lesson revenue generated shall be
reduced by: 1) a ten (10%) percent administrative fee to be retained by the
Golf division, and 2) the employee’s payroll tax withholding requirements in
Page | 13
accordance with applicable law.
F. Other Allowances. The mayor or the city council may, within budgeted
appropriations, authorize th e payment of other allowances in extraordinary
circumstances (as determined by the mayor or the city council).
SUBSECTION VII - SEVERANCE BENEFIT
Subject to availability of funds, any current appointed employee who is not retained, not
terminated for cause and who is separated from city employment involuntarily shall receive
severance benefits based upon their respective appointment date.
A. Severance benefits shall be calculated using the employee’s salary rate in effect on the
employee’s date of termination. Receipt of severance benefits is contingent upon
execution of a release of all claims approved by the city attorney’s office.
1. Employees appointed on or after January 1, 1989 and before January 1,
2000 shall receive a severance benefit equal to one months’ base salary
for each continuous year of city employment in an appointed status
before January 1, 2000. Severance shall be calculated on a pro-rata basis
for a total benefit of up to a maximum of six m onths.
2. Current department heads, along with the mayor’s chief of staff and
the executive director of the city council office, appointed on or after
January 1, 2000 shall receive a severance benefit equal to two month’s
base salary after one full year of continuous city employment in an
appointed status; four months’ base salary after two full years of
continuous city employment in an appointed status; or, six months’ base
salary after three full years or more of continuous city employment in an
appointed status.
3. Current appointed employees who are not department heads, and who
were appointed on or after January 1, 2000 shall receive a severance
benefit equal to one week’s base salary for each year of continuous city
employment in an appointed status, calculated on a pro-rata basis, for a
total benefit of up to a maximum of six weeks.
B. Leave Payout: Appointed employees with leave hour account balances under
Plan A or Plan B shall, in addition to the severance benefit provided, receive a
severance benefit equal to the “retirement benefit” value provided under the
leave plan of which they are a participant (either Plan A or Plan B), if
separation is involuntary and not for cause.
C. Not Eligible for Benefit . An appointed employee is ineligible to be paid
severance benefits under the following circumstances:
Page | 14
1. An employee who, at the time of termination of employment, has been
convicted, indicted, charged or is under active criminal investigation
concerning a public offense involving a felony or moral turpitude. This
provision shall not restrict the award of full severance benefits should
such employee subsequently be found not guilty of such charge or if the
charges are otherwise dismissed.
2. An employee who has been terminated or asked for a resignation by the
mayor or department director under bona fide charges of nonfeasance,
misfeasance or malfeasance in office.
3. An employee who fails to execute a Release of All Claims approved by the
city attorney’s office, where required as stipulated above.
4. An employee who is hired into another position in the city prior to their
separation date.
In the event an employee is hired into another position in the city after
their separation date and prior to the expiration of the period of time for
which the severance benefit was provided, the employee is required to
reimburse the City (on a pro-rata basis) for that portion of the severance
benefit covering the period of time between the date of rehire and the
expiration of the period of time for which the severance benefit was
provided.
SECTION IV: HOLIDAY, VACATION & LEAVE ACCRUAL
Benefits-eligible employees shall receive pay for holidays, vacation and other leave as provided
in this section. Employees do not earn or receive holiday and vacation benefits while on unpaid
leave of absence. However, employees on an unpaid military leave of absence may be entitled
to the restoration of such leave benefits, as required by applicable law.
SUBSECTION I – HOLIDAYS
A. The following days are recognized and observed as holidays for covered
employees. Eligible employees will receive pay for non-worked holidays equal
to their regular rate of pay times the total number of hours which make a
regularly scheduled shift. Except as otherwise noted in this subsection, an
employee may not bank a worked holiday.
1. New Year's Day, the first day of January.
2. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, the third Monday of January.
3. President's Day, the third Monday in February.
Page | 15
4. Memorial Day, the last Monday of May.
5. Independence Day, July 4.
6. Pioneer Day, July 24.
7. Labor Day, the first Monday in September.
8. Columbus Day, the second Monday of October (only for eligible employees
assigned to the Justice Court)
9. Veteran's Day, November 11.
10. Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November.
11. The Friday after Thanksgiving Day (excluding employees assigned to the
Justice Court)
12. Christmas Day, December 25.
13. One personal holiday per calendar year, taken upon request of an
employee and as approved by a supervisor.
B. When any holiday listed above falls on a Sunday, the following business day is
considered a holiday. When any holiday listed above falls on a Saturday, the
preceding business day is considered a holiday. In addition to the above, any day
may be designated as a holiday by proclamation of the mayor or the city council.
C. All holiday hours, including personal holidays, must be used in no less than
regular full day or shift increments.
1. A Fire battalion/division chief may be allowed to use a holiday in
less than a full shift increment only when converting from a
“support” to “operations” work schedule results in the creation of a
half-shift.
D. No employee will receive more than the equivalent of one workday or a regular
scheduled shift as holiday pay for a single holiday. Employees must either work
or be in an authorized paid leave status a working day before and a working day
after the holiday to qualify for holiday pay.
1. An employee who is off work and in a paid status covered by short-term
disability or parental leave receives regular pay as a benefit and,
therefore, is not entitled to bank a holiday while off work.
Page | 16
E. Holiday Exceptions: Except for employees assigned to the Justice Court, an
eligible employee may observe the Friday after Thanksgiving Day up to 50 days
prior to the actual holiday with prior management approval. For Columbus Day,
which is limited only to employees assigned to the Justice Court, an employee
may observe the holiday up to 50 days following the actual holiday.
F. Police Sergeant, Lieutenant, & Captain Holiday Hours Worked: When a day
designated as a holiday falls on a scheduled work day, a Police sergeant,
lieutenant, or captain may elect to take the day off work, subject to the approval
of their supervisor, or receive their regular wages for such days worked and
designate an alternate day off work to celebrate the holiday. For a Police
sergeant whose assignment requires staffing on either the graveyard shift prior
to, or the day and afternoon shift on Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day, all
hours worked will be compensated at a rate of one-and-one-half (1 ½) times the
employee’s regular base wage rate.
G. Police Sergeant, Lieutenant, & Captain Accrued Holiday Leave Payout: Police
sergeants, lieutenants, and captains who retire or separate from city
employment for any reason shall be compensated for any holiday time accrued
and unused during the preceding 12 months. Employees will not be
compensated for any unused holiday time accrued before the 12 months
preceding the employee’s retirement or separation.
1. Any Police sergeant, lieutenant, or captain who is transferred or promoted
to a higher level position within the department, including Deputy Chief,
Assistant Chief, or Police Chief, or to a position in another city department
will be paid out at their current base pay rate for any holiday time accrued
and unused during the preceding 12 months.
SUBSECTION II - VACATION LEAVE
The city will pay eligible employees their regular salaries during vacation periods earned and
taken in accordance with the following provisions. Except as provided for expressly in either city
policy or this plan, vacation leave hours are ineligible to be cashed out or used to exceed the
total number of hours for which an employee is regularly compensated during a work week or a
pay period.
Vacation hours may be used on the first day of the pay period following the period in which
the vacation hours are accrued.
A. Full-Time employees and appointed employees (except for those noted in
paragraphs B and C of this subsection) accrue vacation leave based upon years of
city service as follows:
Page | 17
Years of Hours of Vacation
Accrued Per Bi-weekly
City Service Pay Period
0 to end of year 3 3.73
4 to end of year 6 4.42
7 to end of year 9 4.81
10 to end of year 12 5.54
13 to end of year 15 6.15
16 to end of year 19 6.77
20 or more 7.69
B. Department directors, the mayor’s chief of staff, the mayor’s chief administrative
officer, up t o two additional senior positions in the mayor’s office as specified by the
mayor, the executive director of the city council, and justice court judges will accrue
7.69 hours each bi-weekly pay period.
C. Fire battalion chiefs in the Operations division of the Fire department will
accrue vacation leave according to the following schedule:
Years of Accrued Hours of Vacation Per
City Service Pay Period
0 to end of year 3 5.54
4 to end of year 6 6.46
7 to end of year 9 7.38
10 to end of year 12 8.31
13 to end of year 14 9.23
15 to end of year 19 10.15
20 or more 11.54
D. For any plan year in which there are 27 pay periods, no vacation leave hours will be
awarded in the 27th pay period.
Page | 18
E. Years of city service are based on the most recent date the person became a full-time
salaried employee.
F. Full-time employees re-hired by the city are eligible to receive up to three years
of prior service credit for previous full-time city employment and time worked
with other public jurisdictions without a break in service. Prior service credit is
applicable for vacation accrual, and personal leave accrual, short-term disability
benefits, layoff, and awarding of employee service awards and service
certificates only. Prior service credit does not apply to any other benefits,
including longevity pay or short-term disability.
G. Full-time and appointed employees (except those listed in Paragraph B of this
subsection) may accumulate vacations, according to the length of their full-time
years of city Service, up to the following maximum limits:
Up to and including 9 years Up to 30 days/ 15 shifts/ 240 hours
After 9 years Up to 35 days/ 17.5 shifts/ 280 hours
After 14 years Up to 40 days/ 20 shifts/ 320 hours
For purposes of this subsection, "days" means "8-hour" days and “shifts” means
“24-hour” combat shifts.
H. Department directors and those included in Paragraph B of this subsection may
accumulate up to 320 hours of vacation without regard to their years of employment
with the city.
I. Any vacation accrued beyond the allowable maximums will be deemed forfeited
unless used before the end of the calendar year in which the hours are accrued.
However, in the case of an employee’s return from an unpaid military leave of
absence, leave hours may be restored according to requirements under applicable
law.
J. Vacation Payout at Termination : An employee separating from employment may not
exhaust more than 80 hours of any combination of accrued vacation, personal leave, or
banked (holiday or vacation) leave prior to their last day of employment. Employees
shall be paid at their base hourly rate for any unused accrued vacation leave time
following termination of employment, including retirement.
K. Vacation Allowance: As a recruiting incentive, the mayor or the city council may
provide a one-time allowance of up to 120 hours of vacation leave.
Page | 19
SUBSECTION III - SICK AND OTHER RELATED LEAVE OR PERSONAL LEAVE
Benefits in this section are for the purpose of continuing income replacement to for
employees during absence from work due to illness, accident or personal reasons.
Some of these absences may qualify under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
(FMLA). Although the city requires use of accrued paid leave prior to taking unpaid
FMLA leave, employees will be allowed to reserve up to 80 hours of non -lapsing
leave as a contingency for future use by submitting a written request to Human
Resources. Employees are not eligible to earn or receive leave benefits while on an
unpaid leave of absence.
However, employees on an unpaid military leave of absence may be entitled to the
restoration of such leave benefits, as provided by applicable law.
Employees hired on or after November 16, 1997 receive personal leave benefits
under Plan B. All other employees receive personal leave benefits pursuant to the
plan they participated in as of November 15, 1998. Employees hired before
November 16, 1997 shall receive personal leave benefits under Plan B if they
elected to do so during any city- established election period occurring in 1998 or
later.
A. Plan “A ”
1. Sick Leave
a. Sick leave is provided for full-time employees under Plan “A” as insurance
against loss of income when an employee is unable to perform assigned
duties because of illness or injury. The mayor may e stablish rules
governing the interfacing of sick leave and workers’ compensation benefits
and avoiding, to the extent allowable by law, duplicative payments.
b. Each full-time employee accrues sick leave at a rate of 4.62 hours per pay
period. For any plan year in which there are 27 pay periods, no sick leave
hours will be awarded in the 27th pay period. Authorized and unused sick
leave may be accumulated from year to year, subject to the limitations of
this plan.
1. Sick Leave Accrual for Fire Battalion Chiefs – Each covered employee
shall be entitled to 15 days of sick leave each calendar year, except for
members of the Operations division who shall be entitled to 7.5 shifts
of sick leave each calendar year. The City shall credit a covered
employee’s sick leave account in a lump sum (either 15 days or7.5
shifts) during the first month of each calendar year. Authorized and
unused sick leave may be accumulated from year to year subject to the
limitations of this plan.
Page | 20
c. Under this Plan “A,” Full-Time employees who have accumulated 240
hours of sick leave may choose to convert up to 64 hours of the sick leave
earned and unused during any given year to vacation. Any sick leave used
during the calendar year reduces the allowable conversion by an equal
amount.
1. Sick Leave Conversion for Fire Battalion Chiefs – Fire Battalion Chiefs
who have accumulated 15 shifts (for Operations employees), or 240
hours (for non-Operations employees) may choose to convert a
portion of the year sick leave grant from any given year to vacation, as
follows—
Number of Sick Leave Shifts Used
During Previous Calendar Year
(Operations Only)
Number of Sick Leave Shifts
Available for Conversion
(Operations Only)
No shifts used 5 shifts
One shift used 4 shifts
Two shifts used 3 shifts
Three shifts used 2 shifts
Four shifts used 1 shift
Five or more shifts used No shifts
Number of Sick Leave Shifts Used
During Previous Calendar Year
(Support Only)
Number of Sick Leave Shifts
Available for Conversion
(Support Only)
No days used 9 days
One day used 8 days
Two days used 7 days
Three days used 6 days
Four days used 5 days
Five or more days used 0 days
d. Conversion at the maximum allowable hours will be made unless the
employee elects otherwise. Any election by an employee for no
conversion, or to convert less than the maximum allowable sick leave
hours to vacation time, must be made by notifying the employee’s
department timekeeper or the city payroll administrator, in writing, not
later than the second pay period of the new calendar year (or the
November vacation draw for Fire Battalion Chiefs). Otherwise, the
opportunity to waive conversion or elect conversion other than the
maximum allowable amount will be deemed waived for that calendar
year. In no event may sick leave days be converted from other than the
current year's sick leave allocation.
e. Any sick leave hours, properly converted to vacation benefits as above
Page | 21
described, must be taken before any other vacation hours to which the
employee is entitled; however, in no event is an employee, upon the
employee’s separation from employment, entitled to any pay or
compensation for any sick leave converted to vacation. An employee
forfeits any sick leave converted to vacation remaining unused at the date
of separation from employment.
f. Sick Leave Benefits Upon Layoff. Employees who are subject to layoff
because of lack of work or lack of funds will be paid at 100% of their
hourly base wage rate as of the date of termination for each accumulated
unused sick leave hour.
2. Hospitalization Leave
a. Hospitalization leave is provided for full -time employees under Plan “A,” in
addition to sick leave authorized hereunder, as insuran ce against loss of
income when an employee is unable to perform assigned duties because of
scheduled surgical procedures, urgent medical treatment, or hospital
inpatient admission.
b. Employees are entitled to 30 days of hospitalization leave each calendar
year. Hospitalization leave does not accumulate from year to year.
Employees may not convert hospitalization leave to vacation or any other
leave, nor may they convert hospitalization leave to any additional benefit
at time of retirement.
c. Employees who are unable to perform their duties during a shift due to
preparations (such as fasting, rest, or ingestion of medicine), for a
scheduled surgical procedure, may report the absence from the affected
shift as hospitalization leave, with the prior approval of their division head
or supervisor.
d. An employee who must receive urgent medical treatment at a hospital,
emergency room, or acute care facility, and who is regularly scheduled for
work or unable to perform their duties during a shift (or work day) due to
urgent medical treatment, may re port the absence from the affected shift
as hospitalization leave. Similarly, an employee who is absent from work
while on approved leave is also allowed to claim hospitalization leave.
1. An employee who wishes to claim hospitalization leave is responsible to
report the receipt of urgent medical treatment to the employee’s
division head or supervisor as soon as practical.
Page | 22
2. For purposes of use of hospitalization leave, urgent medical treatment
includes at-home care directed by a physician immediately after the
urgent medical treatment and within the affected shift.
e. Employees who, because they are admitted as an inpatient to a hospital
for medical treatment, are unable to perform their duties, may report
the absence from duty while in the hospital as hospitalization leave.
f. Medical treatment consisting exclusively or primarily of post -injury
rehabilitation or therapy treatment, whether conducted in a hospital or
other medical facility, shall not be counted as hospitalization leave.
g. An employee requesting hospitalization leave under this section may be
required to provide verification of treatment or care from a competent
medical practitioner.
3. Dependent Leave
a. Under Plan “A,” dependent leave may be requested by a full-time
employee for the following reasons:
1. Becoming a parent through birth or adoption of a child.
2. Placement of a foster child in the employee’s home.
3. Due to the care of the employee’s child, spouse, spouse’s child, adult
designee, adult designee’s unmarried child under age 26, or parent
with a serious health condition.
b. Under Plan “A,” dependent leave may also be requested by a full-time
employee to care for an employee’s child, spouse, spouse’s child, adult
designee, an adult designee’s unmarried child under age 26, or a parent
who is ill or injured but who does not have a serious health condition.
c. The following provisions apply to the use of dependent leave by a full-
time employee:
1. Dependent leave may be granted with pay on a straight time basis.
2. If an employee has available unused sick leave, sick leave may be
used as dependent leave.
3. An employee is required to give notice of the need to take
dependent leave, including the expected duration of leave, to his or
her supervisor as soon as possible.
Page | 23
4. Upon request of a supervisor, an employee will be required to
provide a copy of a birth certificate or evidence of child placement
for adoption, or a letter from the attending physician in the event of
hospitalization, injury, or illness of a child, spouse, spouse’s child,
adult designee, adult designee’s child, or parent within five calendar
days following a return from leave.
5. An employee’s sick leave shall be reduced by the number of hours
taken by an employee as dependent leave.
4. Career Incentive Leave, Plan “A”
Full-Time employees, who have been in continuous full-time employment with
the city for more than 20 years, and who have accumulated to their credit 1500 or
more sick leave hours, may make a one-time election to convert up to 160 hours
of sick leave into 80 hours of paid Career Incentive Leave . Career Incentive Leave
must be taken prior to retirement. Sick leave hours converted to Career Incentive
Leave will not be eligible for a cash payout upon termination or retirement even
though the employee has unused Career Incentive Leave hours available. This
leave can be used for any reason. Requests for Career Incentive Leave must be
submitted in writing to the appropriate department director and be approved
subject to the department’s business needs (e.g., work schedules and workloads).
5. Retirement Benefit, Plan “A”
a. Employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the Utah State
Retirement System and who retire from the city will be paid at their base
hourly rate for 50% of their accumulated sick leave hours balance based
on the schedule below:
Retirement Month 50% sick leave will be:
January 1st – June 30th Contribution to EBC 501(c)9 Health
Reimbursement Account Plan
(premium-only account) July 1st – December 31st Cash to retiree
B. Plan “B”
1. The benefit Plan Year of Plan “B” begins in each calendar year on the first day
of the pay-period that includes November 15. Under Plan “B,” paid personal
leave is provided for employees as insurance against loss of income when an
employee needs to be absent from work because of illness or injury, to care for
a dependent, or for any other emergency or personal reason. Where the leave
is not related to the employee’s own illness or disability —or an event that
qualifies under the FMLA—a personal leave request is subject to supervisory
Page | 24
approval based on the operational requirements of the city and any policies
regarding the use of such leave adopted by the department in which the
employee works. Personal leave hours may be used on the first day of the pay
period following the period in which the hours are earned.
2. Each full-time employee under Plan “B” is awarded personal leave hours
based on the following schedule:
Months of
Consecutive Hours of
City Service Personal Leave
Less than 6 40
Less than 24 60
24 or more 80
Employees hired during the plan year are provided paid personal leave on a
pro-rated basis.
3. Not later than October 31st of each calendar year, employees covered by Plan
“B” may elect, by notifying their department timekeeper or the city payroll
administrator in writing, to:
a. Convert any unused personal leave hours available at the end of the first
pay period of November to a lump sum payment equal to the following:
For each converted hour, the employee will be paid 50 percent of the
employee’s regular hourly base wage rate (not including acting pay) in
effect on the date of conversion. In no event will total pay hereunder
exceed 40 hours of pay (80 hours at 50%); or
b. Carryover to the next calendar year up to 80 unused personal leave hours;
or
c. Convert a portion of unused personal leave hours, to a lump sum payment
as provided in subparagraph (3)(a), above, and carry over a portion as
provided in subparagraph (3)(b), above.
4. Maximum Accrual. A maximum of 80 hours of personal leave may be carried
over to the next plan year. Any personal leave hours unused at the end of the
plan year in excess of 80 will be converted to a lump sum payment as provided
in subparagraph 3(a) above.
5. Termination Benefits. An employee separating from employment may not exhaust
Page | 25
more than 80 hours of any combination of accrued vacation, personal leave, or banked
(holiday or vacation) leave prior to their last day of employment. At termination of
employment for any reason, accumulated unused personal leave hours, minus
any adjustment necessary after calculating the “prorated amount,” shall be paid
to the employee at 50 percent of the regular hourly base wage rate (not
including acting pay) on the date of termination for each unused hour. For
purposes of this paragraph, “prorated amount” shall mean the amount of
personal leave credited at the beginning of the plan year, multiplied by the ratio
of the number of pay periods worked in the plan year (rounded to the end of the
pay period which includes the separation date) to 26 pay periods. If the
employee, at the time of separation, has used personal leave in excess of the
prorated amount, the value of the excess amount shall be reimbursed to the city
and may be deducted f rom the employee’s paycheck.
6. Conditions on Use of Personal Leave include:
a. Minimum use of personal leave, with supervisory approval, must be in no
less than quarter-hour increments.
b. Except in unforeseen circumstances, such as emergencies or the
employee’s inability to work due to illness or accident or an
unforeseen FMLA-qualifying event, an employee must provide their
supervisor with prior notice to allow time for the supervisor to make
arrangements necessary to cover the employee’s work.
c. For leave due to unforeseen circumstances, the employee must give their
supervisor as much prior notice as possible.
d. Except as provided for expressly in either city policy or this plan, personal
leave hours are ineligible to be cashed out or used to exceed the total
number of hours for which an employee is regularly compensated during
a work week or a pay period.
7. Career Enhancement Leave, Plan “B”: A full-time employee covered under this
Plan “B” is eligible, after 15 years of full-time service with the city, to be selected
to receive up to two weeks of career enhancement leave. This one -time leave
benefit could be used for formal training, informal course of study, job -related
travel, internship, mentoring or other activity that could be of benefit to the city
and the employee’s career development. Selected employees will receive their
full regular salary during the leave. Request for this leave must be submitted in
writing to the appropriate department head, stating the purpose of the request
and how the leave is intended to benefit the city. The request must be approved
by the department head and by the Human Resourc es director (who will review
the request to ensure compliance with these guidelines).
Page | 26
8. Retirement/Layoff (RL) Benefit, Plan “B”
a. Full-Time employees currently covered under Plan “B” who were hired
before November 16, 1997, and who elected to be covered under Plan
“B,” shall have a retirement/layoff (RL) account equal to sixty percent of
their accumulated unused sick leave hours available on November 16,
1997, minus any hours withdrawn from that account since it was
established.
b. Full-Time employees who were hired before November 16, 1997 and who
elected in 1998 to be covered under Plan “B,” shall have a
retirement/layoff (RL) account equal to fifty percent of their accumulated
unused sick leave hours available on November 14, 1998, minus any hours
withdrawn after the account is established.
c. Full-Time employees who were hired before November 16, 1997 and who
elected in 2007 or later during any period designated by the city to be
covered under Plan “B,” shall have a retirement /layoff (RL) account equal
to forty percent of their accumulated unused sick leave hours available on
the date that Plan B participation began, minus any hours withdrawn after
the account is established.
d. Payment of the RL Account .
1. All hours in an employee’s RL account shall be payable upon
retirement or as a result of layoff. In the case of layoff, 100% of R/L
hours shall be paid to the employee according to the employee’s base
hourly rate of pay on date of layoff. Any employee who quits, resigns,
is separated, or is terminated for cause is not eligible to receive
payment for RL account hours.
2. In the cases of retirement, an eligible employees who meet the
elig ibility requirements of the Utah State Retirement System and
who retire from the city shall be paid at their base hourly rate for
100% of their RL account balance based on the schedule below:
Retirement Month 100% RL hours will be:
January 1st – June 30th Contribution to EBC 501(c)9 Health
Retirement Account Plan
(premium-only account) July 1st – December 31st Cash to retiree
e. Hours may be withdrawn from the RL account to cover an employee’s
absence from work due to illness or injury, need to care for a dependent,
any emergency or to supplement Workers’ Compensation benefits after
personal leave hours are exhausted. RL account hours, when added to
Page | 27
the employee’s workers’ compensation benefit, may not exceed the
employee’s regular net salary.
9. Short-Term Disability Insurance, Plan“B”: Protection against loss of income
when an employee is absent from work due to short-term disability shall be
provided to full-time employees covered under Plan “B” through short-term
disability insurance (SDI). There shall be no cost to the employee for SDI. SDI
shall be administered in accordance with the terms determined by the city.
SUBSECTION IV - PARENTAL LEAVE
A. Full-time employees who become parents through birth, adoption, or foster care may
take up to six consecutive weeks of paid parental leave to care for and bond with the
child. An employee may be allowed to take Pparental leave will up to one year from
start on the date of thea child’s birth or, in the case of adoption or foster care, the
date thea child is placed in the employee’s home. Parental leave may be taken during
a new employee’s probationary period. The probationary period will be extended by
an amount of time equivalent to the parental leave taken.
B. Parental leave will run concurrently (during the same period of time) with FMLA and
SDI (if applicable). Parental leave is limited to six weeks per twelve-month period. For
employees approved for short-term disability, parental leave will make up the
difference between 100% pay and 66 2/3% pay (if applicable) for up to six weeks.
SUBSECTION V - BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
A. Time off with pay will be granted to an An employee who suffers the loss of an
immediate family member including a(n): current spouse, domestic partner, or adult
designee; child, mother, father, brother, sister; current father-in-law, mother-in-law,
son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law; grandparent; current step-
grandfather, step-grandmother; grandchild, or current step grandchild, stepchild,
stepmoth er, stepfather, stepbrother or stepsister, grandfather-in-law, grandmother-
in-law; or, domestic partner’s or adult designee’s relative as if the domestic partner
or adult designee were the employee’s spouse is eligible to be released from work
for bereavement, including attendance at a funeral, memorial service, or related
event(s).
B. In the event of death in any of these instancesof an immediate family member, the
city will provide an employee with up to five working days of paid leave for
bereavement, including attendance at a funeral, memorial service, or related
event(s). The employee will be permitted one additional day of bereavement leave if
the employee attends a funeral, memorial service or equivalent event that is held
more than 150 miles from Salt Lake City and the day following the memorial service
or equivalent event is a regular working shift.
Page | 28
B.C. In the event of death of a first-line extended relative of an employee, or of an
employee’s spouse, domestic partner, or adult designee’s relative as if the adult
designee were the employee’s spouse not covered in paragraph A above (such as an
uncle, aunt or cousin), the city will provide an employee with up to pay an employee
for time off for one work shift for bereavement, including attendance at a funeral,
memorial service, or related event(s) to attend memorial services. The employee will
be permitted one additional day of bereavement leave if the employee attends a
funeral, memorial service or equivalent event that is held more than 150 miles from
Salt Lake City and the day following the memorial service or equivalent event is a
regular working shift.
C.D. In the event of death of a friend, an employee may be allowed to use vacation or
personal leave for time off to attend the funeral or memorial service, as
approved by an immediate supervisor.
D.E. In the event of death of any covered family member while an employee is on
vacation leave, an employee’s absence may be extended and authorized as
bereavement leave.
SUBSECTION VI - MILITARY LEAVE
A. Leave of absence for employees who enter uniformed service. An employee who
enters the uniformed services of the United States, including the United States Army,
United States Navy, United States Marin e Corps, United States Air Force,
commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
United States Coast Guard, or the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service,
is entitled to be absent from his or her duties and service from the city, without pay,
as required by applicable l law. Leave will be granted in accordance with the
Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).
B. Leave while on duty with the armed forces or Utah National Guard. An employee
who is or who becomes a member of the reserves of the federal armed forces,
including the United States Army, United States Navy, United States Marine Corps,
United States Air Force, and the United States Coast Guard, or any unit of the Utah
National Guard, is allowed military leave for up to 15 working days per calendar
year for time spent on active or reserve duty. Military leave may be in addition to
vacation leave and need not be consecutive days of service. To be covered, an
employee must provide documentation demonstrating a duty requirement.
SUBSECTION VII - JURY LEAVE & COURT APPEARANCES
A. Jury Leave: An employee will be released from duty with full pay when, in obedience
to a subpoena or direction by proper authority, the employee is required to either
serve on a jury or appear as a witness for the United States, the state of Utah, or
other political subdivision.
Page | 29
1. Employees are entitled to retain statutory fees paid for service in a federal
court, state court, or city/county justice court.
2. On any day that an employee is required to report for service and is
thereafter excused from such service during his or her regular working
hours from the city, he or she must forthwith return to and carry on his
or her regular city employment. Employees who fail to return to work
after being excused from service for the day are subject to discipline.
B. Court Appearances. A Police sergeant is eligible to receive compensation as a
witness subpoenaed by the city, the State of Utah, or the United States for a court
or administrative proceeding appearance as follows:
1. Appearances in court or administrative proceeding made while on-duty will
be compensated as normal hours worked.
2. In the event an appearance extends beyond the end of an employee's
regularly scheduled shift, time will be counted as normal work time for the
purpose of computing an employee's overtime compensation.
3. Employees are entitled to retain statutory witness fees paid for service in a
federal court, state court, or city/county justice court.
34. Appearances made while off-duty will be compensated as follows:
(a) The city will pay employees for two hours of preparation time
plus actual time spent in court or in an administrative hearing
at one and one-half times their regular hourly rate. Lunch
periods granted are not considered compensable time.
Compensation for additional preparation time for any
subsequent appearance during the same day is allowed only
when there is at least two hours between the employee’s
release time from a prior court or administrative proceeding
and the start of the other.
(b) If the time spent in court or administrative proceeding
extends into the beginning of the employee's regularly
scheduled work shift, time spent in court or in administrative
proceeding will be deemed ended at the time such shift is
scheduled to begin.
45. An employee is required to provide a copy of the subpoena, including the
beginning time and time released from the court or administrative hearing,
with initials of the prosecuting or another court representative within seven
working days following the appearance.
Page | 30
56. Any employee failing to appear in compliance with the terms of a
formal notice or subpoena may be subject to disciplinary action.
SUBSECTION VIII - INJURY LEAVE (SWORN POLICE AND FIRE EMPLOYEES ONLY)
The city has established rules governing the administration of an injury leave program for sworn
police officers and firefighters under the following qualifications and restrictions:
A. The disability must have resulted from an injury arising out of the discharge of
official duties or while exercising some form of necessary job-related activity as
determined by the city;
B. The employee must be unable to return to work due to the injury, as verified by a
medical provider acceptable to the city;
C. The leave benefit may not exceed the value of the employee's net sala ry during the
period of absence due to the injury, less all amounts paid or credited to the
employee as workers’ compensation, Social Security, long-term disability or
retirement benefits, or any form of governmental relief whatsoever;
D. The value of benefits provided to employees under this injury leave program may
not exceed the total of $5,000 per employee per injury, unless approved in writing
by the employee’s department head after receiving an acceptable treatment plan
and consulting with the city’s risk manager;
E. The city's risk manager is principally responsible for the review of injury leave
claims, except that appeals from the decision of the city’s risk manager may be
reviewed by the Human Resources director, who may make recommendations to
the mayor for final decisions;
F. If an employee is eligible for workers’ compensation as provided by law and is not
receiving injury leave pursuant to this provision, an employee may elect to use
either accumulated sick leave or hours from the RL account, if applicable, and
authorized vacation time to supplement workers’ compensation. The total value of
leave hours or hours from an RL account combined with a workers’ compensation
benefit may not exceed an employee's regular net salary.
SUBSECTION IX - ADDITIONAL LEAVES OF ABSENCE
Additional leaves of absence may be requested in writing and granted as identified in policy to
an employee at the discretion of a department director.
SUBSECTION X - EMERGENCY LEAVE
The city may provide additional paid leave to employees if: i) the mayor has declared a local
emergency; and ii) the mayor and/or city council authorize and approve the use of available
Page | 31
funds for such purposes during the period of local emergency.
Emergency leave may also be provided as a form of income replacement for part -time
(hourly) and/or seasonal employees whose work hours are either reduced or discontinued
temporarily, so long as there is an expectation they will return to work after the emergency
period is ended.
APPENDIX A - SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
GENERAL EMPLOYEE PAY PLAN (GEPP)
Effective June 28, 2020June 27, 2021
GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM
SEAX/HRLY $10.87 $35.00
10 $11.54 $15.07 $18.60
11 $12.10 $15.83 $19.55
12 $12.71 $16.76 $20.79
13 $13.35 $17.46 $21.56
14 $14.01 $18.26 $22.51
15 $14.71 $19.33 $23.93
16 $15.44 $20.46 $25.46
17 $16.22 $21.28 $26.34
18 $17.03 $22.62 $28.20
19 $17.88 $23.63 $29.36
20 $18.78 $24.63 $30.47
21 $18.95 $25.84 $32.74
22 $19.91 $27.16 $34.40
23 $20.91 $28.52 $36.14
24 $21.95 $29.93 $37.92
25 $23.04 $31.42 $39.81
26 $24.20 $33.01 $41.81
27 $25.40 $34.66 $43.93
28 $26.66 $36.42 $46.17
29 $28.01 $38.24 $48.47
30 $29.41 $40.15 $50.90
31 $30.88 $42.17 $53.45
32 $32.42 $44.27 $56.11
33 $34.05 $46.49 $58.93
34 $35.75 $48.81 $61.88
35 $37.53 $51.25 $64.97
36 $39.41 $53.81 $68.22
37 $41.38 $56.50 $71.62
38 $43.45 $59.33 $75.20
39 $45.63 - $95.83
40 $47.90 - $100.60
41 $50.30 - $163.20
GRADE MINIMUM CITY MARKET MAXIMUM
SEAX/HRLY $10.87 $35.00
10 $11.66 $15.22 $18.79
11 $12.22 $15.99 $19.75
12 $12.84 $16.93 $21.00
13 $13.48 $17.63 $21.78
14 $14.15 $18.44 $22.74
15 $14.86 $19.52 $24.17
16 $15.59 $20.66 $25.71
17 $16.38 $21.49 $26.60
18 $17.20 $22.85 $28.48
19 $18.06 $23.87 $29.65
20 $18.97 $24.88 $30.77
21 $19.14 $26.10 $33.07
22 $20.11 $27.43 $34.74
23 $21.12 $28.81 $36.50
24 $22.17 $30.23 $38.30
25 $23.27 $31.73 $40.21
26 $24.44 $33.34 $42.23
27 $25.65 $35.01 $44.37
28 $26.93 $36.78 $46.63
29 $28.29 $38.62 $48.95
30 $29.70 $40.55 $51.41
31 $31.19 $42.59 $53.98
32 $32.74 $44.71 $56.67
33 $34.39 $46.95 $59.52
34 $36.11 $49.30 $62.50
35 $37.91 $51.76 $65.62
36 $39.80 $54.35 $68.90
37 $41.79 $57.07 $72.34
38 $43.88 $59.92 $75.95
39 $46.09 - $96.79
40 $48.38 - $101.61
41 $50.80 - $164.83
APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT
Effective June 28, 2020
June 27, 2021
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT ENGINEERING 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL SERVICES 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 033X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR – CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER) 037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER) 035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 032X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 033X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
TRANSITION CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
TRANSITION COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
TRANSITION EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X*
INFORMATION MGT SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 037X
CITY COURTS ADMINISTRATOR 033X
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR 024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POLICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
PUBLIC LANDS PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PUBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 038X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC LANDS 038X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 024X
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be
added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member -elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake
City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full -time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for
city council members-elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees.
APPENDIX C – ELECTED OFFICIALS SALARY SCHEDULE
Annual Salaries
Effective June 28, 2020
June 27, 2021
.
Mayor $146,578
148,034
Council Members $36,650 37,017
Except for leave time, benefits for the mayor and city council members are equivalent to those
provided to full-time employees.
APPENDIX D- U TAH STATE RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FY 20202021-
20212022
Tier 1 Defined Benefit System
System Employee
Contribution Employer Contribution Total
Public Employees Contributory System 06.0% 2014.46
%
20.46%
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0 18.47% 18.47%
Public Safety Noncontributory System 0 46.71% 46.71%
Firefighters Retirement System 0 23.95% 23.95%
Tier 1 Post Retired
System
Post Retired Employment
After 6/30/10 – NO 401(k)
Amortization of UAAL*
Post Retired Employment Before
7/1/2010
Optional 401(k)
Public Employees Noncontributory System
6.61%
11.86%
Public Safety Noncontributory System 24.20% 22.51%
Firefighters Retirement System 0% n/a
Tier 2 Defined Benefit Hybrid System
Employee
Contribution
Employer
Contribution
401(k) Total
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0% 15.80% 0.89% 16.69%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for entry and two year pay steps only)
2.27% (city
paid) 38.28% 6.00% 46.55%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for pay steps year four or more)
2.27% (city
paid) 38.28% 0% 40.55%
Firefighters Retirement System 2.27% (city
paid) 14.08% 0% 16.35%
Tier 2 Defined Contribution Only
Employee
Contribution
Employer
Contribution
401(k) Total
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0% 6.69% 10.00% 16.69%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for entry and two year pay steps only)
0% 24.28% 20.0022.27% 44.2846.55%
Public Safety Noncontributory System
(for pay steps year four or more)
0% 24.28% 14.0016.27% 38.2840.55%
Firefighters Retirement System 0% 0.08% 14.0016.27% 14.0816.35%
Executive Non-Legislative
Position Employer Contribution
Public Employees Noncontributory System
Department Heads, Mayor,
Mayor’s Chief of Staff, Chief
Administrative Officer, Up to Two
Additional Senior Executives in
the Mayor’s Office, Executive
Director for City Council
Normal contribution into Utah Retirement
System (URS)with 3% into 401(k)
– OR –
If Tier 1 and exempt from system or Tier II
and exempt from vesting, 401k contribution
equal to the applicable URS system
contribution plus 3%
Public Safety Noncontributory System Department Head Same as above
Firefighters Retirement System Department Head Same as above
Council Members Elected with prior service in the Utah Retirement System
(Tier 1 Defined Benefit)
System Employee
Contribution Employer Contribution Total
Public Employees Noncontributory System 0 18.47% 18.47%
If exempt… 0 10% base salary to 401(k) 10%
Council Members Elected After July 1, 2011 with no prior service in the Utah Retirement System (may
exempt from vesting)
Tier 2 Defined Contribution Only
Employer 401K Total
6.69% 10% 16.69%
Tier 2 Defined Benefit Hybrid System
Employer 401K Total
15.80% 0.89% 16.69%
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. __ of 2021
(Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the
Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police
Association, representing eligible employees)
An ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the
provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated effective _____________ between Salt
Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees.
PREAMBLE
The City Council, in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. _____ of 2021, approved a
Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police
Association, as the certified bargaining representative for eligible employees. The Memorandum
of Understanding is a three-year agreement. The Memorandum of Understanding is subject to
appropriation of funds by the City Council. The City Council, therefore, wishes to appropriate
funds to implement the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding, as negotiated by the
City and the Salt Lake Police Association, for fiscal year 2022.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to appropriate necessary
funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
approved by the City Council in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ______ of 2021 between Salt
Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association.
SECTION 2. APPROPRIATION. The City Council hereby appropriates necessary
funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding
between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, as approved by the
City Council in Salt Lake City Ordinance No. _____ of 2021.
2
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION. The Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby
authorized to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of
Understanding between the City and the Salt Lake Police Association.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July
____, 2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of June, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
By:_______________________
Jonathan Pappasideris
Jonathan Pappasideris
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. __ of 2021
(Appropriating necessary funds to implement the wage schedule and other contemplated
appropriations for fiscal year 2022, for eligible employees represented by the Salt Lake Police
Association, contingent on final approval and ratification of the Memorandum of Understanding
between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association)
PREAMBLE
Pursuant to City Resolution No. 15 of 2011, the City Council has the authority to approve
the wage schedule for eligible employees represented by the Salt Lake Police Association and also
has the authority to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City
Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association. The Council desires to appropriate funds to
implement the wage schedule and any appropriations associated with the Memorandum of
Understanding for fiscal year 2022, contingent on final approval and ratification of the
Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Salt Lake Police Association.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND CONTINGENT APPROPRIATION. The purpose of this
ordinance is to appropriate necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the wage schedule
and any other funds contemplated by the Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City
Corporation and the Salt Lake City Police Association. This appropriation is contingent on final
approval and ratification of the Memorandum of Understanding and such contingency will be
released when the final Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and
the Salt Lake Police Association is approved by the City Council. Until the City Council approves
the final Memorandum of Understanding, the current Memorandum of Understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association will remain in full force and
effect.
2
SECTION 2. AUTHORIZATION. Upon the release of the budget contingency set forth
in Section 1, the Mayor of Salt Lake City Corporation is authorized to implement the wage
schedule and any other appropriations contemplated in the Memorandum of Understanding.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on July ____,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of June, 2021.
______________________________
Amy Fowler, Council Chair
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
______________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Katherine Lewis
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. __ of 2021
(Approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt
Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees, pursuant to the Collective Bargaining
and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011)
An ordinance approving a Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City
Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees, pursuant to
the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011,
which Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon proper ratification and
signature.
PREAMBLE
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible
employees, have agreed to a Memorandum of Understanding pursuant to the Collective
Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated March 22, 2011, which
Memorandum of Understanding shall become effective upon proper ratification and signature.
Section 6 of the Collective Bargaining and Employee Representation Joint Resolution dated
March 22, 2011 provides that a memorandum of understanding requires the City Council to
approve the memorandum of understanding, enact implementing legislation, and appropriate all
required funds.
The Memorandum of Understanding is a three-year agreement effective for fiscal years
2022-2024. The Memorandum of Understanding is subject to appropriation of funds by the City
Council and the City Council hereby appropriates funds to implement the provisions of the
Memorandum of Understanding, as negotiated by Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake
Police Association, for fiscal year 2022.
2
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to approve the Memorandum
of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association,
representing eligible employees, and to appropriate necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year
2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding.
SECTION 2. The Memorandum of Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation
and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees, is hereby approved and
the necessary funds to implement, for fiscal year 2022, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding are hereby appropriated.
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION. The Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby
authorized to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of
Understanding between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association,
assuming the Memorandum of Understanding is properly ratified and signed.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be deemed effective on
_____________, 2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of June, 2021.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
3
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to Form
Date:__________________
By:_______________________
Jonathan Pappasideris
Jonathan Pappasideris
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ____ of 2021
(Adopting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the
Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within
Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for fiscal year 2021-2022)
An ordinance adopting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for fiscal
year 2021-2022.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City:
PREAMBLE
Chapter 2, Title 59 of the Utah Code states that the governing body of each city shall, by
ordinance or resolution, adopt a proposed tax levy or, if the tax rate is not more than the certified
tax rate, a final tax levy on the real and personal property for various municipal purposes.
Chapter 2, Title 59, of the Utah Code provides for certain notice and hearing requirements if the
proposed tax rate exceeds the certified tax rate. In that event, the proposed tax rate does not
become final unless approved by resolution of the City Council following such notice and public
hearing. It is the intent of Salt Lake City to comply with the mandate of the Utah Legislature,
but reserve in itself the power to amend the tax rates set herein to guarantee, after final appraisal
figures have been determined, that it does not exceed the amount required for its governmental
operations and taxing authority granted by the Legislature.
It is the intent of Salt Lake City to adopt a total final tax rate for the general fund that will
raise $106,568,124, including $364,464 in new growth property tax revenue. Similarly, it is the
intent of Salt Lake City to adopt a final tax rate for the Library that will raise $20,979,2019
including $328,046 in new growth property tax revenue, which the City acknowledges will
require a truth in taxation hearing.
Further, it is the intent of the City to levy an additional tax, if necessary, to cover costs of
State legislative mandates or judicial or administrative orders under Chapter 2, Title 59 of the
Utah Code.
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt a final tax levy,
which includes the amount of the final library fund tax levy previously adopted, pursuant to
Chapter 2, Title 59 of the Utah Code, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City
made taxable by law during fiscal year 2021-2022 to defray the necessary and proper expenses
of Salt Lake City to maintain the government thereof and for operating and maintaining its
libraries and reading rooms and to pay for costs of State legislative mandates or judicial or
administrative orders under Chapter 2, Title 59 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 2. FINAL TAX LEVY: 2021-2022. The City Council hereby adopts the
following final levy, subject to Chapter 2, Title 59 of the Utah Code, upon all real and personal
property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law, for the fiscal year of Salt Lake City
beginning July 1, 2021, and ending June 30, 2022, a tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable
valuation of said property apportioned as follows:
a).002854 shall be credited as revenue in the general fund, generating $88,819,132 of
ongoing revenue; and
b) .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the general fund, a one-year
adjustment generating $433,129 of one-time revenue; and
c).000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special library fund, generating
$20,979,219 of on-going revenue; and
d) .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating
$17,315,863 of on-going revenue; and
e).000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the library fund, a one-year
adjustment generating $83,5554 of one-time revenue.
The City Council hereby further levies a tax to cover the costs of State legislative mandates or
judicial or administrative orders under Chapter 2, Title 59 of the Utah Code as determined by the
Utah State Tax Commission and the Salt Lake County Auditor’s Office.
Said tax levies in this Section 2 shall be subject to Mayor approval and City Council
reconsideration pursuant to § 10-3b-204 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. CERTIFIED TO AUDITOR. The tax levies hereinabove determined and
levied shall be certified by the City Recorder to the Auditor of Salt Lake County, State of Utah,
pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 2, Title 59 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 4. RESERVED POWER AND RIGHT TO AMEND. The City hereby
expressly reserves the power and right to amend any property tax levy made herein as it may
deem just, proper and appropriate under the law.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective on July 1,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _______ day of
________________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
Date:____________________
By:_________________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Katherine Lewis
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ____ of 2021
(Adopting the budget for the Library Fund
of Salt Lake City, Utah for fiscal year 2021-2022)
An ordinance adopting the budget for the library fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for fiscal
year 2021-2022.
PREAMBLE
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 10-6-111 of the Utah Code, the City Budget Officer
prepared and filed with the City Council a tentative budget in proper form for all funds for which
budgets are required by said law, including the tentative budget for the Library Fund, for fiscal
year 2021-2022. The tentative budget was accompanied by a budget message as required by
law.
The tentative budget, including the tentative budget for the Library Fund, was adopted by
the City Council in Resolution No. ____ of 2021, on _______________.
Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code requires that before the 30th day of June of each fiscal
year, or before September 1, in case of a property tax increase under Sections 59-2-919 through
59-2-923 of the Utah Code, the governing body shall, by resolution or ordinance, adopt a budget
for the ensuing fiscal year for each fund for which a budget is required.
The City budget officer has now prepared a budget for the Library Fund, in proper form.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt the budget for the
Library Fund, for fiscal year 2021-2022. All conditions precedent to the adoption of the budget
for the Library Fund have been accomplished.
SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF BUDGET. The budget attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance, shall be, and the same hereby is adopted as the budget for the Library Fund of the
City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the
requirements of Sections 10-6-105, 10-6-118 and 59-2-923 of the Utah Code. The budget for the
Library Fund is subject to the approval of the Mayor and reconsideration of the City Council
pursuant to Section 10-3b-204 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. FILING OF BUDGET. The City Budget Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to certify and file copies of the budget with the State Auditor as required by Section 10-
6-118 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 4. PUBLIC INSPECTION. The City Budget Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to certify and file copies of the budget in the office of said Budget Officer and in the
Office of the City Recorder whose permanent office is located at 451 South State Street, Room
415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 but which office is temporarily located at 349 South 200 East,
Salt Lake City, UT 84111, which budget shall be available for public inspection during regular
business hours as required by Section 10-6-119 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective on July 1,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _______ day of
________________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By:_________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd
Date:____________________
Jaysen Oldroyd
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
1
1
2 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
3 No. ______ of 2021
4
5 (Work in the public way fees)
6
7 An ordinance amending Sections 14.32.015, 14.32.400, 14.32.410, and 14.32.420 of the
8 Salt Lake City Code, relating to work in the public way fees.
9 WHEREAS, the city desires to make certain changes relating to work in the public way
10 definitions and fees; and
11 WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, desires to amend Sections
12 14.32.015, 14.32.400, 14.32.410, and 14.32.420 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to such
13 changes.
14 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that:
15 SECTION 1. Section 14.32.015 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions, is
16 amended as follows:
17 Amending the definition of “Obstruction.” The definition of “Obstruction” is amended to
18 read as follows:
19 OBSTRUCTION: Any thing that obstructs the free use of the public way, including
20 construction barricades, sidewalk canopies, containers, construction materials or equipment,
21 rubbish, glass, material, wood, ashes, tacks, metal, earth, stone, structure, or other object, thing,
22 or substance whichthat may interfere with or obstruct the free use or view of the public way by
23 travelers, or injure or tend to injure or destroy or render unsightly the surface of a public way, or
24 which that may cause or tend to cause such public way to become restricted in its intended uses
25 or unsafe or dangerous for travelers thereon.
26 SECTION 2. Section 14.32.400 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to excavation permit
2
27 fees, is amended as follows:
28 14.32.400: EXCAVATION PERMIT FEES:
29 A. Fees: The city engineer shall charge, and the city treasurer shall collect, upon issuing a
30 permit, the fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule with respect to
31 excavation permitsfor review of the application and site inspection of:
32 1. Excavation, including potholes and test holes;.
33 2. Multiple utility excavations.; or
34 3. Portions of the public way to which excavation restrictions apply. Excavation permits for
35 portions of the public way to which excavation restrictions apply, when permitted pursuant to the
36 provisions of this chapter, shall have a permit fee that is be issued only upon written
37 authorization of the city engineer and the permit fees shall be two(2) times the normal rates
38 published in this section. The city engineer may also require persons working in such portions of
39 the public way to employ extraordinary measures in restoring said public waystreet such as
40 applying seal coat or other surface treatment to the street, if applicable, to maintain the overall
41 integrity of the surface. The value of such extraordinary measures may, in the discretion of the
42 city engineer, be used to offset the additional fees.
43 4. Poles and anchors.
44 B. Higher Fee: For work under a permit that begins before the winter time fee period set forth
45 in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, Where any of the foregoing subsections specify
46 a higher fee for any period, such the winter time higher fee shall will be applicable if any portion
47 of the work is donecompleted during the winter time higher fee period.
3
48 C. Permit Extension: Fee as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The city
49 engineer may deny this permit extension when work is not proceeding on the project in a
50 satisfactory manner.
51 SECTION 3. Section 14.32.410 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to public way
52 obstruction permit fees, is amended as follows:
53 14.32.410: PUBLIC WAY OBSTRUCTION FEES:
54
55 In addition to excavation or improvement fees described in section 14.32.400 and section
56 14.32.405, Tthe city engineer shall charge, and the city treasurer shall collect, upon issuing a
57 permit, the following fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule for review of
58 the application and site inspection of obstructions in the public way:
59 A. If the permit is for an obstruction that will be in place for more than 28 calendar days, a
60 Mmonthly Ffee (Construction Barricades Requiring More Than 5 Days): In addition to
61 excavation fees:
62 1. Flat fee for all or any part of a block face: for such activities as barricading for sidewalk
63 closures, lane closures, sidewalk canopies, containers in the public way, or storage of
64 construction materials or equipment.As shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
65 2. Each additional block face: As shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
66 3. Permit extension: As shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
67 B. If the permit is for an obstruction that will be in place for 28 or fewer calendar days, a
68 weekly fee for all or any part of a block face Short Term Occupation Of The Public Way (5 Days
69 Or Less): for such activities as barricading for sidewalk closures, lane closures, sidewalk
70 canopies, containers in the Scaffolding or other temporary structures over public way, or storage
71 of construction materials or equipment.soil. Permit up to and including five (5) days: As shown
4
72 on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per setup. No fee shall be charged for
73 scaffolding or staging done behind an approved barricade fence.
74
75 C. Permit Extension: The fee for each permit extension shall be as shown on the Salt Lake
76 City consolidated fee schedule. C. On a permit that lasts seven or fewer calendar days, an
77 obstruction fee is waived if an excavation fee or an improvement fee is charged.
78 D. When the duration of the obstruction permit doesn’t end at the end of a week or month,
79 the fee will be determined by rounding to the nearest whole week with the intent to simplify the
80 fee determination. For example, an obstruction permit that is to cover a period of six and one-
81 half months could be charged a fee for six times the monthly fee and two times the weekly fee.
82 SECTION 4. Section 14.32.420 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to permit fee
83 waivers, is amended as follows:
84 14.32.420: PERMIT FEE WAIVERS:
85 The city engineer may waive all or a portion of the permit fees or penalties or a portion thereof,
86 provided for in this chapter, when the/ city engineershe determines that: (a) such permit fee or
87 penalty: a) pertains to construction or rehabilitation of housing for persons whose income is
88 below the median income level for the city; or (b) such permit fee pertains to an encroachment
89 on the public way involving a beautification project which that furthers specific goals and
90 objectives set forth in the city's strategic plan, master plans, or other official documents,
91 including decorative street lighting, building facade lighting, flower and planter boxes, and or
92 landscaping; (c) such permit fee pertains to abutting property owners repairing or replacing “in
93 kind” existing drive approaches, curb, gutter, or sidewalk; (d) such permit fee pertains to a city
94 capital improvement project even if the permittee is a utility company doing work required to be
5
95 accomplished before or during execution of the project; (e) such permit fee pertains to work that
96 is related to a subdivision for which fees were already collected by the city. (f) such permit
97 pertains to a Utah Department of Transportation project affecting the Salt Lake City public way;
98 or (g) such permit pertains to a permit issued on a Salt Lake City Streets Division project
99 affecting the Salt Lake City public way.
100 SECTION 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in
101 accordance with Utah Code section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code section
102 10-3-713.
103 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ____________,
104 2021.
105 ____________________________
106 CHAIRPERSON
107 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
108
109 ___________________________
110 CITY RECORDER
111
112 Transmitted to Mayor on ______________________.
113
114 Mayor’s Action: __________ Approved. ___________ Vetoed.
115
116
117 ____________________________
118 MAYOR
119
120
121
122 ___________________________
123 CITY RECORDER
124
125
126 (SEAL)
127
128
129 Bill No. ______ of 2021.
130 Published: _____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By: _______________________
Boyd Ferguson
Date: __________________
6
131
132
133
134
1
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2
No. ______ of 2021 3
4
(Work in the public way fees) 5
6
An ordinance amending Sections 14.32.015, 14.32.400, 14.32.410, and 14.32.420 of the 7
Salt Lake City Code, relating to work in the public way fees. 8
WHEREAS, the city desires to make certain changes relating to work in the public way 9
definitions and fees; and 10
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, desires to amend Sections 11
14.32.015, 14.32.400, 14.32.410, and 14.32.420 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to such 12
changes. 13
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that: 14
SECTION 1. Section 14.32.015 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions, is 15
amended as follows: 16
Amending the definition of “Obstruction.” The definition of “Obstruction” is amended to 17
read as follows: 18
OBSTRUCTION: Anything that obstructs the free use of the public way, including 19
construction barricades, sidewalk canopies, containers, construction materials or equipment, or 20
other object, thing, or substance that may interfere with or obstruct the free use of the public way 21
by travelers, , or that may cause or tend to cause such public way to become restricted in its 22
intended uses or unsafe or dangerous for travelers thereon. 23
SECTION 2. Section 14.32.400 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to excavation permit 24
fees, is amended as follows: 25
14.32.400: EXCAVATION PERMIT FEES: 26
2
A. Fees: The city engineer shall charge, and the city shall collect, upon issuing a permit, the 27
fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule with respect to excavation permits: 28
1. Excavation, 29
2. Multiple utility excavations; or 30
3. Portions of the public way to which excavation restrictions apply. Excavation permits for 31
portions of the public way to which excavation restrictions apply, when permitted pursuant to the 32
provisions of this chapter, shall have a permit fee that is two times the normal rates. The city 33
engineer may also require persons working in such portions of the public way to employ 34
extraordinary measures in restoring said public way such as applying seal coat or other surface 35
treatment to the street, if applicable, to maintain the overall integrity of the surface. The value of 36
such extraordinary measures may, in the discretion of the city engineer, be used to offset the 37
additional fees. 38
B. Higher Fee: For work under a permit that begins before the winter time fee period set forth 39
in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, the winter time fee will be applicable if any 40
portion of the work is done during the winter time fee period. 41
SECTION 3. Section 14.32.410 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to public way 42
obstruction permit fees, is amended as follows: 43
14.32.410: PUBLIC WAY OBSTRUCTION FEES: 44
45
In addition to excavation or improvement fees described in section 14.32.400 and section 46
14.32.405, the city engineer shall charge, and the city shall collect, upon issuing a permit, the 47
fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule for obstructions in the public way: 48
A. If the permit is for an obstruction that will be in place for more than 28 calendar days, a 49
monthly fee for all or any part of a block face for such activities as barricading for sidewalk 50
3
closures, lane closures, sidewalk canopies, containers in the public way, or storage of 51
construction materials or equipment. 52
B. If the permit is for an obstruction that will be in place for 28 or fewer calendar days, a 53
weekly fee for all or any part of a block face for such activities as barricading for sidewalk 54
closures, lane closures, sidewalk canopies, containers in the public way, or storage of 55
construction materials or equipment. 56
C. On a permit that lasts seven or fewer calendar days, an obstruction fee is waived if an 57
excavation fee or an improvement fee is charged. 58
D. When the duration of the obstruction permit doesn’t end at the end of a week or month, 59
the fee will be determined by rounding to the nearest whole week with the intent to simplify the 60
fee determination. For example, an obstruction permit that is to cover a period of six and one-61
half months could be charged a fee for six times the monthly fee and two times the weekly fee. 62
SECTION 4. Section 14.32.420 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to permit fee 63
waivers, is amended as follows: 64
14.32.420: PERMIT FEE WAIVERS: 65
The city engineer may waive all or a portion of the permit fees provided for in this chapter, 66
when the city engineer determines that: (a) such permit fee pertains to construction or 67
rehabilitation of housing for persons whose income is below the median income level for the 68
city; (b) such permit fee pertains to an encroachment on the public way involving a 69
beautification project that furthers specific goals and objectives set forth in the city's strategic 70
plan, master plans, or other official documents, including decorative street lighting, building 71
facade lighting, flower and planter boxes, or landscaping; (c) such permit fee pertains to abutting 72
property owners repairing or replacing “in kind” existing drive approaches, curb, gutter, or 73
4
sidewalk; (d) such permit fee pertains to a city capital improvement project even if the permittee 74
is a utility company doing work required to be accomplished before or during execution of the 75
project; (e) such permit fee pertains to work that is related to a subdivision for which fees were 76
already collected by the city (f) such permit pertains to a Utah Department of Transportation 77
project affecting the Salt Lake City public way; or (g) such permit pertains to a permit issued on 78
a Salt Lake City Streets Division project affecting the Salt Lake City public way. 79
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in 80
accordance with Utah Code section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code section 81
10-3-713. 82
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ____________, 83
2021. 84
____________________________ 85
CHAIRPERSON 86
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 87
88
___________________________ 89
CITY RECORDER 90
91
Transmitted to Mayor on ______________________. 92
93
Mayor’s Action: __________ Approved. ___________ Vetoed. 94
95
96
____________________________ 97
MAYOR 98
99
100
101
___________________________ 102
CITY RECORDER 103
104
105
(SEAL) 106
107
108
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By: _______________________
Boyd Ferguson
Date: __________________ 4-29-21
5
Bill No. ______ of 2021. 109
Published: _____________________. 110
111
112
113
114
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1
No. ______ of 2021 2
3
(Organizational changes) 4
5
An ordinance enacting section 2.08.120 and amending Sections 2.08.050, 2.08.080, 6
2.26.020. 2.26.170, 2.26.210, 2.43.020, 2.43.030, 2.43.080, 2.94.040, 3.24.030, 3.32.060, 7
3.32.100, 15.16.031, 15.16.035, 15.16.090, and 18.95.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to 8
the department of public services, the department of public lands, and the department of 9
community and neighborhoods. 10
WHEREAS, the city desires to make certain organizational changes relating to the 11
department of public services, the department of public lands, and the department of community 12
and neighborhoods; and 13
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, desires to enact section 2.08.120 14
and amend Sections 2.08.050, 2.08.080, 2.26.020. 2.26.170, 2.26.210, 2.43.020, 2.43.030, 15
2.43.080, 2.94.040, 3.24.030, 3.32.060, 3.32.100, 15.16.031, 15.16.035, 15.16.090, and 16
18.95.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to such organizational changes. 17
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that: 18
SECTION 1. Section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the department of 19
public lands, is enacted to read as follows: 20
2.08.120: Department of Public Lands: 21
A. Functions: The department of public lands shall have charge of and be responsible for the 22
division of parks; the division of golf; the division of trails and natural lands; and the division of 23
urban forestry: 24
1. The general supervision, maintenance, upkeep and control of the city's parks, 25
playgrounds, athletic fields, golf courses, and other recreational areas and facilities; 26
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
2
2. The city's cemetery; 27
3. Recreational activities and public event planning and special event permitting; and 28
4. Maintenance and upkeep of shade trees and other plantings; 29
SECTION 2. Section 2.08.050 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the department of 30
community and neighborhoods, is amended as follows: 31
2.08.050: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS: 32
A. Functions: The department of community and neighborhoods shall have charge of and be 33
responsible for: 34
1. Land use planning; 35
2. Business regulation; 36
3. Housing; 37
4. Building and housing codes; 38
5. City engineering; 39
65. Transportation engineering; 40
76. Nonparking civil enforcement, including enforcement of snow removal; and 41
87. Capital asset management.; and 42
8. Division of youth and family programs. 43
B. City Engineer: The position of city engineer shall be assigned to the department of 44
community and neighborhoods under the administrative direction of the director of community 45
and neighborhoods. The city engineer shall be a registered professional engineer of the state and 46
shall be responsible for the review, supervision and acceptance of all engineering and 47
architectural design, and construction work required by or for the city, except as assigned in this 48
code to other departments or offices of the city; the coordination and supervision of all 49
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
3
construction work done within the public rights of way of the city; and the records of public 50
improvements as prescribed by state statute. The duties may be delegated by the city engineer as 51
deemed prudent and appropriate; such delegation may include the department of public utilities 52
(for recording and maintaining engineering records relating to the water and sewer systems and 53
its engineering functions) and the department of airports. 54
SECTION 3. Section 2.08.080 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the department of 55
public services, is amended as follows: 56
2.08.080: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES: 57
A. Functions: The department of public services shall have charge of and be responsible for 58
the division of parks and public lands; the division of youth and family programs; and fleet 59
management, the division of facilities, the division of compliance, the division of streets, and the 60
division of city engineering: 61
1. The general supervision, maintenance, upkeep and control of the city's parks, 62
playgrounds, athletic fields, golf courses, pools and other recreational areas and facilities; 63
21. The operation of the crossing guard programcity's cemetery; 64
3. Recreational activities and public event planning; 65
4. Maintenance and upkeep of shade trees and other plantings; 66
52. The operation and maintenance of streets, parkways, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic 67
signals, and similar public ways and facilities; 68
63. Maintenance and repair of all city owned buildings within the city; and 69
74. Enforcement of parking ordinances and regulations. 70
B. City Engineer: The position of city engineer shall be assigned to the department of public 71
services under the administrative direction of the director of public services. The city engineer 72
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
4
shall be a registered professional engineer of the state and shall be responsible for the review, 73
supervision and acceptance of all engineering and architectural design, and construction work 74
required by or for the city, except as assigned in this code to other departments or offices of the 75
city; the coordination and supervision of all construction work done within the public rights of 76
way of the city; and the records of public improvements as prescribed by state statute. The duties 77
may be delegated by the city engineer as deemed prudent and appropriate; such delegation may 78
include the department of public utilities (for recording and maintaining engineering records 79
relating to the water and sewer systems and its engineering functions) and the department of 80
airports. 81
SECTION 4. Section 2.26.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions related 82
to urban forestry, is amended as follows: 83
2.26.020: DEFINITIONS: 84
85
For the purpose of this chapter the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall 86
have the meanings given in this section: 87
PARKING/PLANTING STRIP: The area between the curb and sidewalk and the area between 88
sidewalk and private property line that is city owned property; unpaved streetside city property; 89
or an area inside the private property line where an easement is given to the city for the purpose 90
of planting trees. 91
PRIVATE TREES: Any and all trees growing on private property within the city limits as of or 92
after the effective date of the ordinance from which this section or successor sections derives and 93
which that are not defined or designated in this chapter as street trees, park trees or public trees. 94
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY: A portion of property reserved for public use and accepted for such 95
use by the city to provide circulation and travel to abutting properties, including, but not limited 96
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
5
to, streets, alleys, sidewalks, provisions for public utilities, cut and fill slopes, and open public 97
spaces. 98
PUBLIC TREES: All trees growing on any street, park, or any public place owned and/or 99
managed by Salt Lake City as of or after the effective date of this chapter or its successor 100
ordinances. 101
PUBLIC UTILITY: Any public, private or cooperatively owned line, facility or system for 102
producing, transmitting or distributing communications, power, electricity, light, heat, gas, oil 103
products, water, waste or storm water, thatwhich directly or indirectly serves the public or any 104
part thereof within the corporate limits of the city. 105
TREE TOPPING: The specific reduction in the overall size of a tree and/or the severe cutting 106
back of branches or limbs to such a degree so as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the 107
tree. 108
URBAN FORESTER: The city urban forester who is selected by the director of the department 109
of public landsservices to that position in the department of public landsservices. 110
URBAN FORESTRY PROGRAM: The program thatwhich is a part of the department of public 111
landsservices and thatwhich is responsible for the care and maintenance of the urban forest 112
resources located on city property. 113
SECTION 5. Section 2.26.170 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the powers and 114
duties of the urban forester, is amended as follows: 115
2.26.170: POWERS AND DUTIES OF URBAN FORESTER: 116
The urban forester shall be the supervisor of the urban forestry program of the department of 117
public landsservices and shall be responsible to the director of the department of public 118
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
6
landsservices in carrying out the duties of this position. The urban forester shall initiate an urban 119
forest management plan. 120
SECTION 6. Section 2.26.210 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to landscape permits 121
for public right of way, is amended as follows: 122
2.26.210: LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY: 123
It is unlawful for any person to plant, prune or remove any public tree, without first obtaining a 124
permit from the department of public landsservices. Permits shall not be required for work 125
performed by city personnel. 126
A. Planting And Maintaining Public Trees: The Salt Lake City urban forestry standards and 127
specifications shall be used as a guideline for planting and pruning public trees. 128
B. Removing Trees: The urban forester must approve any permit for removal of public trees 129
and as a condition, the permittee may be required to compensate the city for the value of the 130
tree(s) removed either by replacement thereof or by monetary assessment. 131
C. Permit Fee: Commercial companies, public utilities or individuals employed in the 132
landscaping or arboricultural business shall be required to pay a permit fee per job as shown on 133
the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule or a permit fee per year as shown on the Salt Lake 134
City consolidated fee schedule. 135
SECTION 7. Section 2.43.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the purpose of the 136
golf enterprise fund advisory board, is amended as follows: 137
2.43.020: PURPOSE: 138
A. The mayor and the Salt Lake City council, hereinafter city council, declare it to be a policy 139
of the city that the city be a provider of golf course facilities and golf programs in Salt Lake City, 140
under the direction of the golf division of the Salt Lake department of public landsservices 141
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
7
department. The division shall coordinate all golf related activities funded by the city's golf 142
enterprise fund. 143
B. The golf division may direct, operate and maintain all golf courses maintained by Salt 144
Lake City. 145
C. This chapter is enacted and intended for the purpose of establishing a Salt Lake City golf 146
enterprise fund advisory board for the general purpose of establishing criteria and guidelines for 147
assessing the city's golf program needs, and to recommend priorities of the golf program, as well 148
as to monitor any joint golf agreements between the city and other entities. The more specific 149
powers and duties of the board shall be set forth in section 2.43.080 of this chapter, or its 150
successor. 151
SECTION 8. Section 2.43.030 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions related 152
to the golf enterprise fund advisory board, is amended as follows: 153
2.43.030: DEFINITIONS: 154
BOARD: The Salt Lake City golf enterprise fund advisory board created under this chapter. 155
CITY: Means and refers to Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah. 156
COUNCIL: The Salt Lake City council. 157
DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC landsSERVICES: A person appointed by 158
the mayor with the advice and consent of the council who is duly qualified and acting head of the 159
department of public landsservices. 160
FUND OR GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND: The golf enterprise fund referred to in this chapter or 161
its successor. 162
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
8
GOLF DIRECTOR: A person appointed by the director of the department of public 163
landsservices to serve as the director of the division of golf within the department of public 164
landsservices. 165
MAYOR: The duly elected or appointed, and qualified mayor of Salt Lake City. 166
MEMBER: A person appointed by the mayor who is duly qualified and an acting, voting 167
member of the board. 168
PERSON: An individual. 169
SECTION 9. Section 2.43.080 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the powers and 170
duties of the golf enterprise fund advisory board, is amended as follows: 171
2.43.080: POWERS AND DUTIES: 172
The board shall have the following powers and duties: 173
A. Determine and establish such rules and regulations for the conduct of the board as the 174
members shall deem advisable; provided, however, that such rules and regulations shall not be in 175
conflict with this chapter or its successor, or other city, state or federal law; 176
B. Recommend the adoption and alteration of all rules, regulations, procedures and 177
ordinances which it shall from time to time deem in the public interest and most likely to 178
advance, enhance, foster, and promote activities, for the conduct of the business of, and the use 179
and operation of golf facilities within Salt Lake City and for the purposes of carrying out the 180
objects of this chapter; provided, however, that such rules and regulations shall not be in conflict 181
with this chapter or its successor, or other city, state or federal law; 182
C. Recommend planning, establishment and approval of all construction and expansion 183
projects for city golf programs and facilities. The approval required in this section shall be in 184
addition to all other approval of other city departments required by law or city policy; 185
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
9
D. Recommend broad matters of policy regarding the operation and management of city golf 186
programs and facilities which may include, but need not be limited to, the following: 187
1. Expansion of city golf facilities, 188
2. Timing of such expansion, 189
3. Establishing rate structures for golf fees to the public or to any person, firm or 190
corporation, public or private, and for leasing of space or facilities, or for granting rights, 191
privileges or concessions at city golf facilities, and 192
4. Determination of the number or type of concessionaires, services, or facilities at city golf 193
facilities; 194
E. Review and make recommendation annually on the budget for the division of golf within 195
the department of public landsservices; 196
F. Assist the golf director in the continuing orderly development and promotion of city golf 197
facilities in order to best serve the citizens of Salt Lake City. 198
SECTION 10. Section 2.94.040 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the creation of the 199
parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board, is amended as follows: 200
2.94.040: CREATION OF BOARD: 201
A. There is created the city parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board 202
(board). The board shall be comprised of nine (9) to eleven (11) voting members. All 203
appointments shall be made for a three (3) year term. One member of the board shall be 204
appointed from each city council district. The remaining members of the board shall be 205
appointed as at large members. No more than three (3) members may live outside of the Salt 206
Lake City boundaries. 207
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
10
B. Nominations to the board should reflect diverse community interests by seeking to find 208
members with geographic, professional, cultural and neighborhood/community diversity. 209
C. The board shall also include the following ex officio nonvoting members: 210
1. The chair of the city's transportation advisory board, or the chair's designee; 211
2. The chair of the community development and capital improvements board or the chair's 212
designee; 213
3. The chair of the historic landmark commission or the chair's designee; and 214
4. The mayor or the mayor's designees. 215
D. The board will be located and staffed in the department of public landsservices and will 216
have access to and assistance from the parks director, the urban forester, the director of 217
transportation, the trails coordinator, the city natural lands program manager, or their designees; 218
other city departments and/or divisions; and the city attorney's office as needed. 219
SECTION 11. Section 3.24.030 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions related 220
to procurement, is amended as follows: 221
3.24.030: DEFINITIONS: 222
As used in this chapter: 223
BID PACKAGE: All documents, whether attached or incorporated by reference, used for 224
soliciting sealed bids, such as a notice, bid form, form contract, specifications and similar 225
documents. 226
BID, PROPOSAL OR OFFER: An offer to perform. 227
BIDDER: A person who submits a bid. 228
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection 229
3.24.040A of this chapter, or any successor to that subsection. 230
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
11
CITY ENGINEER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection 2.08.0802.08.050B of 231
this code, or any successor to that subsection. 232
CONSTRUCTION: The process of building, renovating, altering, improving or repairing any 233
city building or public work, but does not include the routine operation or maintenance, or minor 234
repair of, existing city property. 235
CONSTRUCTION RELATED SUPPLIES AND SERVICES: All supplies and services put to 236
use in the process of construction, including professional services related to construction. 237
DIVISION: Any division of a city department, or any other agency or subdivision of the city. 238
OFFEROR: A person who submits a proposal, a response to a request for qualifications, a quote, 239
a bid, or any other offer or submission. 240
OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES: All supplies and services put to use in 241
connection with managing and operating the city, including professional services. Operational 242
supplies and services does not include construction related supplies and services. 243
PERSON: Any individual, group of individuals, entity, group of entities, business, agency, club, 244
committee, union or other organization or organizations, not including the city or any of its 245
employees, officers, departments or divisions. 246
PROCUREMENT: Buying, purchasing, renting, leasing, leasing with an option to purchase, or 247
otherwise acquiring any supplies or services, and all related acquisition processes. 248
PROCUREMENT OFFICIAL: The chief procurement officer or city engineer, or a city 249
employee who is authorized to act in the capacity of a procurement official as specifically 250
delegated in the procurement rules. 251
PROCUREMENT RULES: The administrative rules, policies, executive orders or other rules 252
adopted by the mayor in accordance with subsection 3.24.040A2 of this chapter, or any 253
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
12
successor to that subsection. 254
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Those services that are provided by a person skilled in the 255
practice of a learned or technical discipline. Providers of professional services often require 256
prolonged and specialized intellectual training, and profess attainments in special knowledge as 257
distinguished from mere skills. Disciplines may include, without limitation, accounting, auditing, 258
architecture, court reporting, engineering, experts in a specialized field, finance, law, materials 259
testing, medicine, planning, surveying, and others. 260
PROPOSAL PACKAGE: All documents, whether attached or incorporated by reference, used 261
for soliciting a proposal, response to a request for qualifications, or other proposal or offer to 262
perform city work, and may include such documents as a notice, scope of work, form contract or 263
other documents. 264
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: Soliciting to receive sealed proposals. 265
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: Soliciting to receive statements describing the 266
qualifications of potential bidders or offerors. 267
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER OR RESPONSIBLE OFFEROR: A person who has the capability in 268
all respects to fully perform the contract requirements, and who has the integrity, capacity and 269
reliability which will assure good faith performance. 270
RESPONSIVE BIDDER OR RESPONSIVE OFFEROR: A person who has submitted a bid or 271
offer that conforms in all material respects to the bid package, proposal package, or other 272
request. 273
SERVICES: The furnishing of labor, time, or effort by any person, and includes professional 274
services. 275
SUPPLIES: All property, including equipment, materials and printing, but excludes land or a 276
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
13
permanent interest in land. 277
SECTION 12. Section 3.32.060 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to applications, 278
investigations, and recommendations related to no fault golf claims, is amended as follows: 279
3.32.060: APPLICATION; INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDATION: 280
Applications received by the city recorder shall be referred to the department of public 281
landsservices for investigation and recommendation. The department's report shall be forwarded 282
to the city attorney for determination under the criteria of this chapter. All payments authorized 283
by the city attorney shall be made by the director of the department of public landsservices solely 284
from funds to be set aside under this chapter. 285
SECTION 13. Section 3.22.100 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to budget 286
expenditures related to no fault golf claims, is amended as follows: 287
3.32.100: BUDGET EXPENDITURE: 288
The city department of public landsservices is authorized to provide for and include within its 289
budget within the recreation fund an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) 290
annually from which funds may be drawn to make the foregoing payments. 291
SECTION 14. Section 15.16.031 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to golf courses and 292
green fees, is amended as follows: 293
15.16.031: GOLF COURSES; GREEN FEES: 294
A. Fees Imposed: There shall be imposed on any person playing golf at any of the city golf 295
courses the fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Programs and fee 296
descriptions listed in this section shall become effective on the effective date hereof. All green 297
fees, membership programs fees, parameters, and program time frames shall be listed on the golf 298
program's website and posted in each city golf course clubhouse on the effective date hereof. 299
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
14
1. Senior And Junior Green Fees: Time frames for senior and junior green fees will be 300
determined by the head golf course professional at each city golf course and are listed in the Salt 301
Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Time frames are subject to change. Senior green fees and 302
junior green fees shall not be considered discounts for purposes of this section. 303
2. Grandfathered Senior Season Golf Passes: In 1997, the decision was made by the Salt 304
Lake City golf division, with the approval of the city council, to phase out the senior season pass 305
program and to effectively grandfather the senior season pass program for qualified senior 306
season pass holders based on their continued participation. Senior season passes for calendar 307
years subsequent to 1997 were available solely to those individuals who had purchased calendar 308
1997 senior season passes on or before June 30, 1997. No other senior season passes were issued 309
after this date. Senior season pass holders were required to renew their passes annually in order 310
to remain eligible for a senior season pass. Any senior season pass holder who failed to renew a 311
senior season pass for any year would not be eligible for any further senior season pass. 312
Grandfathered senior season golf passes may not be used Fridays through Sundays, on 313
recognized holidays, or for group reservation play. The fees pertaining to the grandfathered 314
senior season pass program are shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. 315
Grandfathered senior season golf passes shall be considered discounts for purposes of this 316
section. 317
3. School Golf Teams: Green fees for school golf team special play (high school and 318
collegiate golf teams) shall be as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Time 319
frames for school golf team fees will be determined by the head golf course professional at each 320
city golf course and are listed in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Time frames are 321
subject to change. 322
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
15
4. Tee Times: Green fees for advance tee time reservations (minimum 18 holes) shall be as 323
shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. 324
5. Tee Time Cancellations: The department of public landsservices, with concurrence of the 325
mayor, may set reasonable regulations with regard to amounts of refunds for cancellations and 326
time in which cancellations must be made. 327
6. Membership Programs: The golf director may designate time specific membership 328
programs designed to encourage customer loyalty and recurring play at city golf courses. Golf 329
program membership prices, parameters, and time frames are subject to change annually and are 330
listed in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. 331
7. Private Lessons: Private lesson fees may be established by the individual teacher. Private 332
lesson fees shall be approved annually by the golf director or designee. 333
B. Golf CIP Fund: One dollar ($1.00) less sales tax per nine (9) hole round at each city golf 334
course for all green fee types shall be allocated to a dedicated golf capital improvement fund. 335
Nine percent (9%) of all annual pass sales shall be allocated to this fund. 336
C. Definitions: 337
JUNIOR: Any person age six (6) through age seventeen (17). 338
RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Pioneer Day, and Labor 339
Day. 340
SENIOR: Any person age sixty (60) or older. 341
D. Adjustment Of Programs, Fees, Or Time Frames: Subject to subsection E of this section, 342
the director of public landsservices or the director's designee, with the approval of the mayor or 343
the mayor's designee, shall have the authority, at any time, to adjust the programs, fees, or time 344
frames listed in this section for any city golf course, if the director deems it necessary to increase 345
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
16
the use of the golf course or to increase fee revenue. All changes to programs, fees, or time 346
frames shall be posted immediately at the point of sale in the city golf course clubhouse and on 347
the city golf course website. 348
E. Prohibition On Use Of More Than One Discount Or Pass: With respect to the green fee for 349
any round of golf, a golfer may not benefit from more than one kind of discount or pass during a 350
single transaction. For example, a golfer participating in a membership program may not 351
combine their membership discount with any other discount pass or promotional offer, thereby 352
receiving multiple discounts on any given green fee. 353
SECTION 15. Section 15.16.035 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to golf courses and 354
group reservations, is amended as follows: 355
15.16.035: GOLF COURSES; GROUP RESERVATIONS: 356
Reservations for exclusive use of a city golf course such as for group play and outings shall be 357
allowed in accordance with the following guidelines: 358
A. Merchandise Fees: Additional fees above and beyond the regular green and cart fees may 359
be added for group play at the discretion of the head golf professional at each city golf course. A 360
per person minimum merchandise fee may be charged as shown on the Salt Lake City 361
consolidated fee schedule. 362
B. Green Fees: Green fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule shall be 363
charged for each participant. 364
C. Reasonable Regulations Set By Department Of Public Services: The department of public 365
landsservices may set reasonable regulations with regard to: 366
1. How many days in advance of the date for which the facility is reserved that all 367
reservation and green fees must be paid; 368
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
17
2. Amounts of refunds for cancellations and time in which cancellations must be made; 369
3. Rescheduling "rainouts"; 370
4. Minimum and maximum number of golfers; 371
5. Cart reservations; 372
6. Minimum and maximum numbers of holes to be reserved for group play; 373
7. Dates and times for taking group reservations; 374
8. City golf courses for which group reservations may be made; 375
9. Fees for special services requested of the city over and above services normally provided; 376
however, such costs shall reflect actual city costs, including overhead; 377
10. How many group reservations a person or group can make in a single calendar year; 378
11. How many group reservations a person can make per request; 379
12. Making reservations by phone or in person. 380
D. Adjustment Of Programs, Fees, Or Time Frames: Subject to subsection 15.16.031E of this 381
chapter, the director of public landsservices or the director's designee, with the approval of the 382
mayor or the mayor's designee, shall have the authority, at any time, to adjust the programs, fees, 383
or time frames listed in this section for any city golf course, if the director deems it necessary to 384
increase the use of the golf course or to increase golf course revenue. All changes to programs, 385
fees, or time frames shall be posted immediately at the point of sale in the city golf course 386
clubhouse and on the city golf course website. 387
SECTION 16. Section 15.16.090 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to recreation 388
program fees, is amended as follows: 389
15.16.090: RECREATION PROGRAM FEES: 390
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
18
A. The director of public landsservices and the director of community and neighborhoods, 391
with approval of the mayor, shall propose to the city council a fee schedule for recreation 392
program fees. The city council may consider including such fees on the Salt Lake City 393
consolidated fee schedule. The maximum fees charged shall be as follows: 394
1. City Special Events: The majority of special events produced or sponsored by Salt Lake 395
City shall be free to the public. These events include, but are not limited to, Bike Bonanza, 396
Friday Night Flicks, 4th Of July Celebration at Jordan Park, Fireworks for 24th Of July 397
Celebration at Liberty Park, Monster Block Party, Highland Bagpipe Experience, Salt Lake City 398
Gets Fit Online Tracking, The People's Market, and the International Culture Fest. 399
The Salt Lake City Gets Fit 5K is currently charging the admission fee shown on the Salt Lake 400
City consolidated fee schedule. The Salt Lake City Gets Fit Volleyball Tournament charges the 401
admission fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. These admission fees will 402
not exceed the amount shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule, per person. These 403
fees represent a partial recovery of the costs to produce these events. 404
Fees for additional special events and festivals that may be produced or sponsored by Salt Lake 405
City, or held on city owned or city managed property, shall be established consistent with fees 406
for similar events as set forth in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. 407
2. Programs And Fees: 408
a. Youth And Family Programs: The youth and family recreation program fees are shown 409
on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. 410
B. The director of public landsservices and the director of community and neighborhoods, in 411
proposing fees within the limitations provided in this section, shall determine the fee based upon 412
the recoupment of costs incurred by city personnel for their time in making the reservations and 413
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
19
in their involvement with the activity. The fees charged do not represent the payment of any 414
consideration for the use of the land, which is provided at no cost, fee, or consideration. 415
C. Refugee youth are eligible for scholarships funded by Salt Lake County. In general, 416
refugee status is a form of protection that may be granted to people who meet the definition of 417
refugee and who are of special humanitarian concern to the United States. 418
SECTION 17. Section 18.95.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions 419
related to use of Leed standards in city funded construction, is amended as follows: 420
18.95.020: DEFINITIONS: 421
As used in this chapter: 422
APPLICABLE BUILDING PROJECT: The construction or major renovation of a commercial, 423
multi-family residential, or municipal building that will contain more than ten thousand (10,000) 424
square feet of occupied space when the design contract for such project commences on or after 425
November 17, 2006. 426
BOARD: The board of appeals and examiners created under chapter 18.12 of this title, 427
hereinafter called "board". 428
BUILDING OFFICIAL: The director of the division of building services or the designee of the 429
director. 430
CERTIFIED: The level of compliance with the leadership in energy and environmental design 431
(LEED) standards designated as "certified" by the United States Green Building Council 432
(USGBC). 433
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection 434
3.24.040A of this code or that employee's designee pursuant to section 3.24.050 of this code, or 435
any successor to those sections. 436
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
20
CITY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS: Funds that are authorized to be used for construction by the 437
city council for use by any person or city department in order to construct an applicable building 438
project, including, without limitation, loans, grants, and tax rebates. However, this term shall not 439
apply to the funds of the library or redevelopment agency. 440
CITY ENGINEER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection 2.08.0802.08.050B of 441
this code or that employee's designee pursuant to section 3.24.050 of this code, or any successor 442
to those sections. 443
LEED STANDARD: The leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) green building 444
rating system for new construction and major renovations (LEED-NC) as adopted in November 445
2002 and revised in November 2005, the LEED green building rating system for commercial 446
interiors (LEED-CI) as adopted in November 2002, or the LEED green building rating system 447
for existing buildings upgrades, operations and maintenance (LEED-EB) as adopted in October 448
2004 and updated in July 2005. 449
MAJOR RENOVATION: Work that demolishes space down to the shell structure and rebuilds it 450
with new walls, ceilings, floors and systems, when such work affects more than twenty five 451
percent (25%) of the building's square footage, and the affected space is at least ten thousand 452
(10,000) square feet or larger. 453
SILVER: The level of compliance with LEED standards designated as "silver" by the USGBC. 454
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: A determination of good faith efforts to comply as further 455
described in section 18.95.110 of this chapter. 456
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE: Any proposed building that is intended to be in existence for five 457
(5) years or less or any existing building that at the time it was constructed was intended to be in 458
existence for five (5) years or less. 459
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
21
USGBC: The organization known as the United States green building council. 460
SECTION 18. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in 461
accordance with Utah Code section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code section 462
10-3-713. 463
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ____________, 464
2021. 465
____________________________ 466
CHAIRPERSON 467
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 468
469
___________________________ 470
CITY RECORDER 471
472
Transmitted to Mayor on ______________________. 473
474
Mayor’s Action: __________ Approved. ___________ Vetoed. 475
476
477
____________________________ 478
MAYOR 479
480
481
482
___________________________ 483
CITY RECORDER 484
485
486
(SEAL) 487
488
489
Bill No. ______ of 2021. 490
Published: _____________________. 491
492
493
494
495
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By: _______________________
Boyd Ferguson
Date: __________________
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2021
(Organizational changes)
An ordinance enacting section 2.08.120 and amending Sections 2.08.050, 2.08.080,
2.26.020. 2.26.170, 2.26.210, 2.43.020, 2.43.030, 2.43.080, 2.94.040, 3.24.030, 3.32.060,
3.32.100, 15.16.031, 15.16.035, 15.16.090, and 18.95.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to
the department of public services, the department of public lands, and the department of
community and neighborhoods.
WHEREAS, the city desires to make certain organizational changes relating to the
department of public services, the department of public lands, and the department of community
and neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, desires to enact section 2.08.120
and amend Sections 2.08.050, 2.08.080, 2.26.020. 2.26.170, 2.26.210, 2.43.020, 2.43.030,
2.43.080, 2.94.040, 3.24.030, 3.32.060, 3.32.100, 15.16.031, 15.16.035, 15.16.090, and
18.95.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to such organizational changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that:
SECTION 1. Section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the department of
public lands, is enacted to read as follows:
2.08.120: Department of Public Lands:
A. Functions: The department of public lands shall have charge of and be responsible for the
division of parks; the division of golf; the division of trails and natural lands; and the
division of urban forestry:
1. The general supervision, maintenance, upkeep and control of the city's parks,
playgrounds, athletic fields, golf courses, and other recreational areas and facilities;
2. The city's cemetery;
2
3. Recreational activities and public event planning and special event permitting; and
4. Maintenance and upkeep of shade trees and other plantings;
SECTION 2. Section 2.08.050 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the department of
community and neighborhoods, is amended as follows:
2.08.050: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS:
A. Functions: The department of community and neighborhoods shall have charge of and be
responsible for:
1. Land use planning;
2. Business regulation;
3. Housing;
4. Building and housing codes
5. Transportation engineering;
6. Nonparking civil enforcement, including enforcement of snow removal;
7. Capital asset management; and
8. Division of youth and family programs.
SECTION 3. Section 2.08.080 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the department of
public services, is amended as follows:
2.08.080: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES:
A. Functions: The department of public services shall have charge of and be responsible for
the division of fleet management, the division of facilities, the division of compliance, the
division of streets, and the division of city engineering:
1. The operation of the crossing guard program;
2. The operation and maintenance of streets, parkways, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic
signals, and similar public ways and facilities;
3. Maintenance and repair of all city owned buildings within the city; and
3
4. Enforcement of parking ordinances and regulations.
B. City Engineer: The position of city engineer shall be assigned to the department of public
services under the administrative direction of the director of public services. The city
engineer shall be a registered professional engineer of the state and shall be responsible for
the review, supervision and acceptance of all engineering and architectural design, and
construction work required by or for the city, except as assigned in this code to other
departments or offices of the city; the coordination and supervision of all construction work
done within the public rights of way of the city; and the records of public improvements as
prescribed by state statute. The duties may be delegated by the city engineer as deemed
prudent and appropriate; such delegation may include the department of public utilities (for
recording and maintaining engineering records relating to the water and sewer systems and
its engineering functions) and the department of airports.
SECTION 4. Section 2.26.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions related
to urban forestry, is amended as follows:
2.26.020: DEFINITIONS:
For the purpose of this chapter the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall
have the meanings given in this section:
PARKING/PLANTING STRIP: The area between the curb and sidewalk and the area between
sidewalk and private property line that is city owned property; unpaved streetside city property;
or an area inside the private property line where an easement is given to the city for the purpose
of planting trees.
PRIVATE TREES: Any and all trees growing on private property within the city limits as of or
after the effective date of the ordinance from which this section or successor sections derives and
that are not defined or designated in this chapter as street trees, park trees or public trees.
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY: A portion of property reserved for public use and accepted for such
use by the city to provide circulation and travel to abutting properties, including, but not limited
to, streets, alleys, sidewalks, provisions for public utilities, cut and fill slopes, and open public
spaces.
PUBLIC TREES: All trees growing on any street, park, or any public place owned and/or
managed by Salt Lake City as of or after the effective date of this chapter or its successor
ordinances.
PUBLIC UTILITY: Any public, private or cooperatively owned line, facility or system for
producing, transmitting or distributing communications, power, electricity, light, heat, gas, oil
products, water, waste or storm water, that directly or indirectly serves the public or any part
thereof within the corporate limits of the city.
4
TREE TOPPING: The specific reduction in the overall size of a tree and/or the severe cutting
back of branches or limbs to such a degree so as to remove the normal canopy and disfigure the
tree.
URBAN FORESTER: The city urban forester who is selected by the director of the department
of public lands to that position in the department of public lands.
URBAN FORESTRY PROGRAM: The program that is a part of the department of public lands
and that is responsible for the care and maintenance of the urban forest resources located on city
property.
SECTION 5. Section 2.26.170 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the powers and
duties of the urban forester, is amended as follows:
2.26.170: POWERS AND DUTIES OF URBAN FORESTER:
The urban forester shall be the supervisor of the urban forestry program of the department of
public lands and shall be responsible to the director of the department of public lands in carrying
out the duties of this position. The urban forester shall initiate an urban forest management plan.
SECTION 6. Section 2.26.210 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to landscape permits
for public right of way, is amended as follows:
2.26.210: LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY:
It is unlawful for any person to plant, prune or remove any public tree, without first obtaining a
permit from the department of public lands. Permits shall not be required for work performed by
city personnel.
A. Planting And Maintaining Public Trees: The Salt Lake City urban forestry standards and
specifications shall be used as a guideline for planting and pruning public trees.
B. Removing Trees: The urban forester must approve any permit for removal of public trees and
as a condition, the permittee may be required to compensate the city for the value of the
tree(s) removed either by replacement thereof or by monetary assessment.
C. Permit Fee: Commercial companies, public utilities or individuals employed in the
landscaping or arboricultural business shall be required to pay a permit fee per job as shown
on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule or a permit fee per year as shown on the Salt
Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
SECTION 7. Section 2.43.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the purpose of the
golf enterprise fund advisory board, is amended as follows:
5
2.43.020: PURPOSE:
A. The mayor and the Salt Lake City council, hereinafter city council, declare it to be a policy of
the city that the city be a provider of golf course facilities and golf programs in Salt Lake
City, under the direction of the golf division of the department of public lands. The division
shall coordinate all golf related activities funded by the city's golf enterprise fund.
B. The golf division may direct, operate and maintain all golf courses maintained by Salt Lake
City.
C. This chapter is enacted and intended for the purpose of establishing a Salt Lake City golf
enterprise fund advisory board for the general purpose of establishing criteria and guidelines
for assessing the city's golf program needs, and to recommend priorities of the golf program,
as well as to monitor any joint golf agreements between the city and other entities. The more
specific powers and duties of the board shall be set forth in section 2.43.080 of this chapter,
or its successor.
SECTION 8. Section 2.43.030 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions related
to the golf enterprise fund advisory board, is amended as follows:
2.43.030: DEFINITIONS:
BOARD: The Salt Lake City golf enterprise fund advisory board created under this chapter.
CITY: Means and refers to Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the state of Utah.
COUNCIL: The Salt Lake City council.
DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC lands: A person appointed by the mayor
with the advice and consent of the council who is duly qualified and acting head of the
department of public lands.
FUND OR GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND: The golf enterprise fund referred to in this chapter or
its successor.
GOLF DIRECTOR: A person appointed by the director of the department of public lands to
serve as the director of the division of golf within the department of public lands.
MAYOR: The duly elected or appointed, and qualified mayor of Salt Lake City.
MEMBER: A person appointed by the mayor who is duly qualified and an acting, voting
member of the board.
PERSON: An individual.
6
SECTION 9. Section 2.43.080 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the powers and
duties of the golf enterprise fund advisory board, is amended as follows:
2.43.080: POWERS AND DUTIES:
The board shall have the following powers and duties:
A. Determine and establish such rules and regulations for the conduct of the board as the
members shall deem advisable; provided, however, that such rules and regulations shall not
be in conflict with this chapter or its successor, or other city, state or federal law;
B. Recommend the adoption and alteration of all rules, regulations, procedures and ordinances
which it shall from time to time deem in the public interest and most likely to advance,
enhance, foster, and promote activities, for the conduct of the business of, and the use and
operation of golf facilities within Salt Lake City and for the purposes of carrying out the
objects of this chapter; provided, however, that such rules and regulations shall not be in
conflict with this chapter or its successor, or other city, state or federal law;
C. Recommend planning, establishment and approval of all construction and expansion projects
for city golf programs and facilities. The approval required in this section shall be in addition
to all other approval of other city departments required by law or city policy;
D. Recommend broad matters of policy regarding the operation and management of city golf
programs and facilities which may include, but need not be limited to, the following:
1. Expansion of city golf facilities,
2. Timing of such expansion,
3. Establishing rate structures for golf fees to the public or to any person, firm or
corporation, public or private, and for leasing of space or facilities, or for granting rights,
privileges or concessions at city golf facilities, and
4. Determination of the number or type of concessionaires, services, or facilities at city
golf facilities;
E. Review and make recommendation annually on the budget for the division of golf within the
department of public lands;
F. Assist the golf director in the continuing orderly development and promotion of city golf
facilities in order to best serve the citizens of Salt Lake City.
SECTION 10. Section 2.94.040 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the creation of the
7
parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board, is amended as follows:
2.94.040: CREATION OF BOARD:
A. There is created the city parks, natural lands, trails, and urban forestry advisory board
(board). The board shall be comprised of nine (9) to eleven (11) voting members. All
appointments shall be made for a three (3) year term. One member of the board shall be
appointed from each city council district. The remaining members of the board shall be
appointed as at large members. No more than three (3) members may live outside of the Salt
Lake City boundaries.
B. Nominations to the board should reflect diverse community interests by seeking to find
members with geographic, professional, cultural and neighborhood/community diversity.
C. The board shall also include the following ex officio nonvoting members:
1. The chair of the city's transportation advisory board, or the chair's designee;
2. The chair of the community development and capital improvements board or the chair's
designee;
3. The chair of the historic landmark commission or the chair's designee; and
4. The mayor or the mayor's designees.
D. The board will be located and staffed in the department of public lands and will have access
to and assistance from the parks director, the urban forester, the director of transportation, the
trails coordinator, the city natural lands program manager, or their designees; other city
departments and/or divisions; and the city attorney's office as needed.
SECTION 11. Section 3.24.030 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions related
to procurement, is amended as follows:
3.24.030: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this chapter:
BID PACKAGE: All documents, whether attached or incorporated by reference, used for
soliciting sealed bids, such as a notice, bid form, form contract, specifications and similar
documents.
BID, PROPOSAL OR OFFER: An offer to perform.
BIDDER: A person who submits a bid.
8
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection
3.24.040A of this chapter, or any successor to that subsection.
CITY ENGINEER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection 2.08.080 of this code,
or any successor to that subsection.
CONSTRUCTION: The process of building, renovating, altering, improving or repairing any
city building or public work, but does not include the routine operation or maintenance, or minor
repair of, existing city property.
CONSTRUCTION RELATED SUPPLIES AND SERVICES: All supplies and services put to
use in the process of construction, including professional services related to construction.
DIVISION: Any division of a city department, or any other agency or subdivision of the city.
OFFEROR: A person who submits a proposal, a response to a request for qualifications, a quote,
a bid, or any other offer or submission.
OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES: All supplies and services put to use in
connection with managing and operating the city, including professional services. Operational
supplies and services does not include construction related supplies and services.
PERSON: Any individual, group of individuals, entity, group of entities, business, agency, club,
committee, union or other organization or organizations, not including the city or any of its
employees, officers, departments or divisions.
PROCUREMENT: Buying, purchasing, renting, leasing, leasing with an option to purchase, or
otherwise acquiring any supplies or services, and all related acquisition processes.
PROCUREMENT OFFICIAL: The chief procurement officer or city engineer, or a city
employee who is authorized to act in the capacity of a procurement official as specifically
delegated in the procurement rules.
PROCUREMENT RULES: The administrative rules, policies, executive orders or other rules
adopted by the mayor in accordance with subsection 3.24.040A2 of this chapter, or any
successor to that subsection.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Those services that are provided by a person skilled in the
practice of a learned or technical discipline. Providers of professional services often require
prolonged and specialized intellectual training and profess attainments in special knowledge as
distinguished from mere skills. Disciplines may include, without limitation, accounting, auditing,
architecture, court reporting, engineering, experts in a specialized field, finance, law, materials
testing, medicine, planning, surveying, and others.
PROPOSAL PACKAGE: All documents, whether attached or incorporated by reference, used
for soliciting a proposal, response to a request for qualifications, or other proposal or offer to
9
perform city work, and may include such documents as a notice, scope of work, form contract or
other documents.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: Soliciting to receive sealed proposals.
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS: Soliciting to receive statements describing the
qualifications of potential bidders or offerors.
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER OR RESPONSIBLE OFFEROR: A person who has the capability in
all respects to fully perform the contract requirements, and who has the integrity, capacity and
reliability which will assure good faith performance.
RESPONSIVE BIDDER OR RESPONSIVE OFFEROR: A person who has submitted a bid or
offer that conforms in all material respects to the bid package, proposal package, or other
request.
SERVICES: The furnishing of labor, time, or effort by any person, and includes professional
services.
SUPPLIES: All property, including equipment, materials and printing, but excludes land or a
permanent interest in land.
SECTION 12. Section 3.32.060 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to applications,
investigations, and recommendations related to no fault golf claims, is amended as follows:
3.32.060: APPLICATION; INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDATION:
Applications received by the city recorder shall be referred to the department of public lands for
investigation and recommendation. The department's report shall be forwarded to the city
attorney for determination under the criteria of this chapter. All payments authorized by the city
attorney shall be made by the director of the department of public lands solely from funds to be
set aside under this chapter.
SECTION 13. Section 3.22.100 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to budget
expenditures related to no fault golf claims, is amended as follows:
3.32.100: BUDGET EXPENDITURE:
The city department of public lands is authorized to provide for and include within its budget
within the recreation fund an amount not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) annually
from which funds may be drawn to make the foregoing payments.
SECTION 14. Section 15.16.031 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to golf courses and
green fees, is amended as follows:
10
15.16.031: GOLF COURSES; GREEN FEES:
A. Fees Imposed: There shall be imposed on any person playing golf at any of the city golf
courses the fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Programs and fee
descriptions listed in this section shall become effective on the effective date hereof. All
green fees, membership programs fees, parameters, and program time frames shall be listed
on the golf program's website and posted in each city golf course clubhouse on the effective
date hereof.
1. Senior And Junior Green Fees: Time frames for senior and junior green fees will be
determined by the head golf course professional at each city golf course and are listed in
the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Time frames are subject to change. Senior
green fees and junior green fees shall not be considered discounts for purposes of this
section.
2. Grandfathered Senior Season Golf Passes: In 1997, the decision was made by the Salt
Lake City golf division, with the approval of the city council, to phase out the senior
season pass program and to effectively grandfather the senior season pass program for
qualified senior season pass holders based on their continued participation. Senior season
passes for calendar years subsequent to 1997 were available solely to those individuals
who had purchased calendar 1997 senior season passes on or before June 30, 1997. No
other senior season passes were issued after this date. Senior season pass holders were
required to renew their passes annually in order to remain eligible for a senior season
pass. Any senior season pass holder who failed to renew a senior season pass for any year
would not be eligible for any further senior season pass. Grandfathered senior season golf
passes may not be used Fridays through Sundays, on recognized holidays, or for group
reservation play. The fees pertaining to the grandfathered senior season pass program are
shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. Grandfathered senior season golf
passes shall be considered discounts for purposes of this section.
3. School Golf Teams: Green fees for school golf team special play (high school and
collegiate golf teams) shall be as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
Time frames for school golf team fees will be determined by the head golf course
professional at each city golf course and are listed in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee
schedule. Time frames are subject to change.
4. Tee Times: Green fees for advance tee time reservations (minimum 18 holes) shall be as
shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
5. Tee Time Cancellations: The department of public lands, with concurrence of the mayor,
may set reasonable regulations with regard to amounts of refunds for cancellations and
time in which cancellations must be made.
6. Membership Programs: The golf director may designate time specific membership
programs designed to encourage customer loyalty and recurring play at city golf courses.
11
Golf program membership prices, parameters, and time frames are subject to change
annually and are listed in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
7. Private Lessons: Private lesson fees may be established by the individual teacher. Private
lesson fees shall be approved annually by the golf director or designee.
B. Golf CIP Fund: One dollar ($1.00) less sales tax per nine (9) hole round at each city golf
course for all green fee types shall be allocated to a dedicated golf capital improvement fund.
Nine percent (9%) of all annual pass sales shall be allocated to this fund.
C. Definitions:
JUNIOR: Any person age six (6) through age seventeen (17).
RECOGNIZED HOLIDAYS: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Pioneer Day, and Labor Day.
SENIOR: Any person age sixty (60) or older.
D. Adjustment Of Programs, Fees, Or Time Frames: Subject to subsection E of this section, the
director of public lands or the director's designee, with the approval of the mayor or the
mayor's designee, shall have the authority, at any time, to adjust the programs, fees, or time
frames listed in this section for any city golf course, if the director deems it necessary to
increase the use of the golf course or to increase fee revenue. All changes to programs, fees,
or time frames shall be posted immediately at the point of sale in the city golf course
clubhouse and on the city golf course website.
E. Prohibition On Use Of More Than One Discount Or Pass: With respect to the green fee for
any round of golf, a golfer may not benefit from more than one kind of discount or pass
during a single transaction. For example, a golfer participating in a membership program
may not combine their membership discount with any other discount pass or promotional
offer, thereby receiving multiple discounts on any given green fee.
SECTION 15. Section 15.16.035 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to golf courses and
group reservations, is amended as follows:
15.16.035: GOLF COURSES; GROUP RESERVATIONS:
Reservations for exclusive use of a city golf course such as for group play and outings shall be
allowed in accordance with the following guidelines:
A. Merchandise Fees: Additional fees above and beyond the regular green and cart fees may be
added for group play at the discretion of the head golf professional at each city golf course.
A per person minimum merchandise fee may be charged as shown on the Salt Lake City
consolidated fee schedule.
B. Green Fees: Green fees shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule shall be
charged for each participant.
12
C. Reasonable Regulations Set By Department Of Public Services: The department of public
lands may set reasonable regulations with regard to:
1. How many days in advance of the date for which the facility is reserved that all
reservation and green fees must be paid;
2. Amounts of refunds for cancellations and time in which cancellations must be made;
3. Rescheduling "rainouts";
4. Minimum and maximum number of golfers;
5. Cart reservations;
6. Minimum and maximum numbers of holes to be reserved for group play;
7. Dates and times for taking group reservations;
8. City golf courses for which group reservations may be made;
9. Fees for special services requested of the city over and above services normally
provided; however, such costs shall reflect actual city costs, including overhead;
10. How many group reservations a person or group can make in a single calendar year;
11. How many group reservations a person can make per request;
12. Making reservations by phone or in person.
D. Adjustment Of Programs, Fees, Or Time Frames: Subject to subsection 15.16.031E of this
chapter, the director of public lands or the director's designee, with the approval of the
mayor or the mayor's designee, shall have the authority, at any time, to adjust the programs,
fees, or time frames listed in this section for any city golf course, if the director deems it
necessary to increase the use of the golf course or to increase golf course revenue. All
changes to programs, fees, or time frames shall be posted immediately at the point of sale in
the city golf course clubhouse and on the city golf course website.
SECTION 16. Section 15.16.090 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to recreation
program fees, is amended as follows:
15.16.090: RECREATION PROGRAM FEES:
A. The director of public lands and the director of community and neighborhoods, with
approval of the mayor, shall propose to the city council a fee schedule for recreation
13
program fees. The city council may consider including such fees on the Salt Lake City
consolidated fee schedule. The maximum fees charged shall be as follows:
1. City Special Events: The majority of special events produced or sponsored by Salt Lake
City shall be free to the public. These events include, but are not limited to, Bike
Bonanza, Friday Night Flicks, 4th Of July Celebration at Jordan Park, Fireworks for
24th Of July Celebration at Liberty Park, Monster Block Party, Highland Bagpipe
Experience, Salt Lake City Gets Fit Online Tracking, The People's Market, and the
International Culture Fest.
The Salt Lake City Gets Fit 5K is currently charging the admission fee shown on the
Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The Salt Lake City Gets Fit Volleyball
Tournament charges the admission fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee
schedule. These admission fees will not exceed the amount shown on the Salt Lake City
consolidated fee schedule, per person. These fees represent a partial recovery of the
costs to produce these events.
Fees for additional special events and festivals that may be produced or sponsored by
Salt Lake City, or held on city owned or city managed property, shall be established
consistent with fees for similar events as set forth in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee
schedule.
2. Programs And Fees:
a. Youth And Family Programs: The youth and family recreation program fees are
shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule.
B. The director of public lands and the director of community and neighborhoods, in proposing
fees within the limitations provided in this section, shall determine the fee based upon the
recoupment of costs incurred by city personnel for their time in making the reservations and
in their involvement with the activity. The fees charged do not represent the payment of any
consideration for the use of the land, which is provided at no cost, fee, or consideration.
C. Refugee youth are eligible for scholarships funded by Salt Lake County. In general, refugee
status is a form of protection that may be granted to people who meet the definition of
refugee and who are of special humanitarian concern to the United States.
SECTION 17. Section 18.95.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to definitions
related to use of Leed standards in city funded construction, is amended as follows:
18.95.020: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this chapter:
APPLICABLE BUILDING PROJECT: The construction or major renovation of a commercial,
multi-family residential, or municipal building that will contain more than ten thousand (10,000)
14
square feet of occupied space when the design contract for such project commences on or after
November 17, 2006.
BOARD: The board of appeals and examiners created under chapter 18.12 of this title,
hereinafter called "board".
BUILDING OFFICIAL: The director of the division of building services or the designee of the
director.
CERTIFIED: The level of compliance with the leadership in energy and environmental design
(LEED) standards designated as "certified" by the United States Green Building Council
(USGBC).
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection
3.24.040A of this code or that employee's designee pursuant to section 3.24.050 of this code, or
any successor to those sections.
CITY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS: Funds that are authorized to be used for construction by the
city council for use by any person or city department in order to construct an applicable building
project, including, without limitation, loans, grants, and tax rebates. However, this term shall not
apply to the funds of the library or redevelopment agency.
CITY ENGINEER: The city employee designated pursuant to subsection 2.08.080 of this code
or that employee's designee pursuant to section 3.24.050 of this code, or any successor to those
sections.
LEED STANDARD: The leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) green building
rating system for new construction and major renovations (LEED-NC) as adopted in November
2002 and revised in November 2005, the LEED green building rating system for commercial
interiors (LEED-CI) as adopted in November 2002, or the LEED green building rating system
for existing buildings upgrades, operations and maintenance (LEED-EB) as adopted in October
2004 and updated in July 2005.
MAJOR RENOVATION: Work that demolishes space down to the shell structure and rebuilds it
with new walls, ceilings, floors and systems, when such work affects more than twenty five
percent (25%) of the building's square footage, and the affected space is at least ten thousand
(10,000) square feet or larger.
SILVER: The level of compliance with LEED standards designated as "silver" by the USGBC.
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: A determination of good faith efforts to comply as further
described in section 18.95.110 of this chapter.
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE: Any proposed building that is intended to be in existence for five
(5) years or less or any existing building that at the time it was constructed was intended to be in
existence for five (5) years or less.
15
USGBC: The organization known as the United States green building council.
SECTION 18. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in
accordance with Utah Code section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code section
10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ____________,
2021.
____________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
___________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on ______________________.
Mayor’s Action: __________ Approved. ___________ Vetoed.
____________________________
MAYOR
___________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ______ of 2021.
Published: _____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
By: _______________________
Boyd Ferguson
Date: __________________ 5-4-21
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY22Budget
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Russell Weeks, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver, Allison Rowland,
Sylvia Richards, Kira Luke, Sam Owen, and Libby Stockstill
DATE: June 15, 2021 UPDATED 2:05 PM
RE: Fiscal Year 2021-22 MOTIONS FOR CITY BUDGET ADOPTION
– RED TEXT TO BE READ ALOUD BY COUNCIL MEMBERS –
MOTION 1. Adopts City Budget except Library and CIP (agenda item H14)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as outlined in the
attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and
the Library Fund.
MOTION 2. Adopts Library Fund Budget (agenda item H10)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
MOTION 3. Sets All Tax Rates (agenda item H9)
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library
Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as listed
on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax
Commission.
A tax of .004076 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. .002854 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $88,819,132 of on-going revenue; and
B. .000014 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $433,129
of one-time revenue; and
C. .000556 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $17,315,863 of on-going
revenue; and
D. .000649 shall be credited as revenue in the special Library Fund, generating $20,979,219 of on-going revenue;
and
E. .000003 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the Library Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $83,554 of
one-time revenue.
MOTION 4. CIP & Debt Service
I move that the Council adopt $37,355,406 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $8,572,651 in funding
for annual debt service and other ongoing commitments, as detailed in the Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget
excluding the first year payment for the proposed new sales tax Series 2022 bond, and with the understanding that
funding for CIP projects and the proposed bond will be considered separately later this year.
MOTION 5. Adopts Legislative Intent Statements / Interim Study Items
I move that the Council adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5,
items A through E.
A. Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration propose a boarded building fee that
includes the full city costs of monitoring and responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
B. Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide their strategy for
evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
C. Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide information on the following items in
anticipation of a work session briefing to review and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
a. Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
b. Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed short-term CIP plan,
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning ordinances, with the goal of removing
barriers to providing additional food and beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a future legislative priority.
Page | 2
D. Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the definition of “public safety” for allocation of
Funding Our Future revenue include not only the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social
workers and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the City’s public safety alternative
response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
E. Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide an estimate of the funding that would
be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as
supplies, equipment, and appropriate signage.
MOTION 6. All other budget-related ordinances, including compensation (agenda items H3 to H8 and H11 to
H13)
I move that the Council adopt ordinances A through F as shown on the motion sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2021-
22 budget.
A. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Local 1004, representing
eligible employees in City departments.
B. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022 the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees in the Fire
Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
C. Appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2022, the provisions of the memorandum of understanding between
Salt Lake City Corporation and the Salt Lake Police Association, representing eligible employees in the Police Department.
Staff note: the Council is tentatively scheduled to consider adopting the memorandum of understanding in July.
D. Approving the Fiscal Year 2022 Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City Corporation and increasing
salary figures by 2% based on the Council’s final adopted FY22 annual budget.
E. Approving an ordinance amending Chapter 14.32, Salt Lake City Code, Construction, Excavation and Obstructions in the Public
Right of Way
F. Approving an ordinance amending several chapters of Salt Lake City Code related to organizational changes including creation of
the Public Lands Department.
Staff note: The Council is scheduled to hold a public hearing and potentially adopt amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee
Schedule on July 13.
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
Revenue and Other Sources 293,332,497 32,797,506 326,130,003
Changes to FY21 Base Revenue
Sales and Use Tax 5,956,884
Sales Tax Option (1/2 Percent) 2,802,494
RDA Property Tax 594,707
Property Tax Adjustment (628,442)
Franchise Tax 890,000
PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) 53,148 Business/Regulatory Licenses (1,600,684)
Permits 4,702,006
Intergovernmental revenue 199,618
Charges for Service (518,238)
Fines and Forfeitures (464,391)
Parking Meter revenue (660,000)
Interest income (629,528)
Miscellaneous revenue (641,771)
Interfund reimbursement 1,409,938
Transfers 365,000
CPI Adjustment 377,633
Inland Port Tax Increment 983,242
Inland Port Tax Increment - Contra Revenue (983,242)
Convention Hotel Tax Increment 10,116
Convention Hotel Tax Increment - Contra Revenue (10,116)
Total Base Changes 9,405,880 2,802,494 12,208,374 - - - - - -
Proposed Changes in Revenue Resulting from Policy and Ordinance Changes
Judgment Levy (66,835) 43,697
Estimated Property Tax for New Growth 1,324,297 (959,833)
Property Tax Stabilization 1,000,000
Total Revenue Changes from Policy and Ordinance Changes 2,257,462 - 2,257,462 (916,136) - - - (916,136) -
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
One-Time Revenues
Remove Airport Building Permits (2,300,000)
Remove Health Insurance Premium Holiday (1,830,389)
Remove CDBG Transfer for CARES/Misc Grants (423,332)
Remove Transfer from Debt Service for North Temple Viaduct (996,159)
Remove Transfer from CIP (City Daycare Project) (250,000)
Remove Transfer from CIP (Recapture Completed Projects) (422,979)
Remove Airport Reimbursement for Body Cameras (129,000)
Remove Budgeted Use of Fund Balance (4,885,620)
ARPA Revenue Loss 10,000,000 1,432,646
One Time Use of General Fund Balance 4,900,000 1,193,000
REP Funding from FY2021 (remaining) 2,300,000 314,899
One Time Use of Fund Balance from Underserved Neighborhood Holding Account 1,000,000
Use of remaining balance of Investments in Underserved Neighborhoods Holding
Account 669,138
Fire Reimbursement for Deployments 515,000
Reallocated prior year Housing Plan funding 750,000
Health Insurance Premium Holiday 915,195
Use of Funding Our Future Fund Balance 2,129,483
Police Impact Fee Reimbursement to General Fund 1,898,497
Use of Funding Our Future Transit Key Routes Holding Account 1,879,654
Total One-Time Revenue 8,392,716 750,000 9,142,716 5,508,180 - 4,009,137 - 9,517,317 -
Grand Total Revenue Changes 20,056,058 3,552,494 23,608,552 4,592,044 - 4,009,137 - 8,601,181 -
Grand Total Revenue 313,388,555 36,350,000 349,738,555 4,592,044 4,009,137 8,601,181 -
City Council:
FY21 Beginning Balance 4,226,075 35.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget 243,979
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 35,759
Insurance rate changes 13,172
Living Wage Adjustment 910
1% Salary Increase 31,264
Total City Council 4,551,159 35.00 - - 4,551,159 35.00 - - - - - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Legislative Non-Departmental
FY21 Beginning Balance 290,100 - - -
No Changes
Total City Council 290,100 - - - 290,100 - - - - - - -
Mayor:
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,799,755 25.00 83,310 1.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget 283,148
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 166,145
Insurance rate changes 8,744
Living Wage Adjustment 3,795
1% Salary Increase 30,241
Reclassify Census Coordinator to Citywide Volunteer Coordinator 83,310 1.00 (83,310) (1.00)
Transfer ADA & Equity Coordinator positions from CAN 288,576 2.00
Transfer Consumer Protection Analyst position from Finance 83,216 1.00
REP Commission Senior Staff Position (Funding is in Non Departmental) 1.00
Sponsorship Awards 5,000
Cultural Ambassador pilot program 9,850
Total Mayor 4,761,780 30.00 - - 4,761,780 30.00 - - - - - -
Attorneys Office:
FY21 Beginning Balance 7,123,638 50.25
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget 66,603
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 31,843
Insurance rate changes 19,984
1% Salary Increase 55,480
BA#5 - New - Sr City Attorney 173,978 1.00
BA#5 - New - Sr City Attorney 173,978 1.00
BA#5 - New - Legal Secretary 87,748 1.00
BA#5 - New - Assistant City Recorder 97,612 1.00
Social Media Retention 15,588
Office Victim Advocate - Grant Funding Match 18,500
Associate City Prosecutors (10 Months) 268,050 3.00 (178,700) (2.00)
Increase Pay Grade for 10 Associate City Prosecutors 75,000
Total Attorney 8,133,002 57.25 - - 8,133,002 57.25 (103,700) (2.00) - - (103,700) (2.00)
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Community and Neighborhood Development
FY21 Beginning Balance 23,242,118 197.00 1,076,452 7.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (101,089)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 658,084
Insurance rate changes 77,552
CCAC Adjustments [10 Months] 107,553
Merit Changes 58,448
1% Salary Increase 179,963
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Mgr (105,920) (1.00)
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Specialist (80,054) (1.00)
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Specialist (83,930) (1.00)
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Specialist (90,916) (1.00)
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Innovations Team Support Budget (53,400)
BA#7 - Transfer to IMS - GIS Programmer Analyst (106,458) (1.00)
BA#7 - Transfer to IMS - GIS Programmer Analyst (108,646) (1.00)
Transfer ADA & Equity Coordinator positions to Mayor's Office (288,576) (2.00)
Transfer Youth and Family Division to Community and Neighborhoods
Department (Personnel Costs) 1,812,153 18.00
Transfer Youth and Family Division to Community and Neighborhoods
Department (Operational Costs) 251,345
Transfer Engineering Division from Community and Neighborhoods Department
(Personnel Costs) (4,864,910) (44.00)
Transfer Engineering Division from Community and Neighborhoods Department
(Operational Costs) (178,402)
CAN Deputy Director of Community Services [10 Months] 158,750 1.00
HAND Office Facilitator [Revenue Offset] 79,836 1.00
HAND Operational Costs [Revenue Offset] 40,164
Planning Manager (10 Months) 113,458 1.00
Senior Planners (10 Months) 275,248 3.00
Homeless Services
Homeless Cut #1 - CCC/Green Team Reductions (6 Months) (115,000) -
Sales Tax Option - Transit
No change in Can (see Non Departmental)
Sales Tax Option - Housing Plan
Build A More Equitable City (from Non-Departmental) 388,000
Expanded Housing Opportunity Program - Landlord Insurance (from Non-
Departmental) 53,000
Incentivized Rent Assistance (from Non-Departmental) 671,620
Mortgage Assistance (from Non-Departmental) 50,000
Housing Plan - Marketing home ownership programs (from Non-
Departmental$300,000) 300,000
Housing Plan - Service Models for most vulnerable (from Non-
Departmental $535,380) 525,380
Shared Housing 62,000
Total Community and Neighborhood 20,568,719 166.00 3,046,398 6.00 23,615,117 172.00 388,706 4.00 - - 388,706 4.00
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Economic Development
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,388,562 18.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (8,383)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 104,634
Insurance rate changes 6,812
Merit Changes 5,792
1% Salary Increase 17,498
Small Business Construction Mitigation (One-time) 200,000
Total Economic Development 2,514,915 18.00 - - 2,514,915 18.00 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Finance:
FY21 Beginning Balance 8,387,673 69.70
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (29,493)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 62,676
Insurance rate changes 29,916
Merit Changes 17,138
1% Salary Increase 64,316
BA#5 - New - Consumer Protection Analyst 45,644 1.00
Transfer Consumer Protection Analyst position to Mayor's Office (83,216) (1.00)
Deputy Director [10 Months] 143,603 1.00
Business Analyst 89,500 1.00
Amex Card Merchant Fees 40,000
Total Finance 8,727,757 71.70 - - 8,727,757 71.70 40,000 - - - 40,000 -
Fire:
FY21 Beginning Balance 42,737,520 366.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (306,333)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 272,562
Insurance rate changes 164,636
Plan A Payout [One-Time] 161,243
Merit Changes 346,049
1% Salary Increase 340,686
BA#7 - Transfer from PD - Battalion Chief (Changed from EM Manager) 142,920 1.00
BA#7 - New - Fire Captain 124,776 1.00
BA#7 - Transfer from PD - EM Training Program Specialist 114,849 1.00
BA#7 - Transfer from PD - EM Community Preparedness Coordinator 88,924 1.00
BA#7 - Transfer from PD - EM Multi Language Media Coordinator 98,918 1.00
BA#7 - Transfer from PD - EM Critical Infrastructure Liaison 89,608 1.00
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - EM Operational Costs 107,294
Airport Rescue Firefighting Expenses (ARFF) 352,300
Fire Department Deployment Expense Reimbursement [One-Time] 515,000
Emergency Management Phase 2 236,448 2.00
Total Fire 45,350,952 372.00 236,448 2.00 45,587,400 374.00 - - - - - -
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Human Resources
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,629,008 21.20
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget 33,586
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 97,183
Insurance rate changes 10,088
CCAC Adjustments [10 Months] 3,502
1% Salary Increase 25,266
BA#4 - New - Deputy HR Director (.85) 147,991 0.85
Human Resources Analyst - ERP 111,075 1.00
HR Supervisor - Recruitment [10 Months] 101,020 1.00
Human Resources Technician [10 Months] 108,950 2.00
Total Human Resources 3,267,669 26.05 - - 3,267,669 26.05 - - - - - -
Justice Courts
FY21 Beginning Balance 4,726,866 42.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (14,055)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 73,500
Insurance rate changes 16,876
Merit Changes 12,292
1% Salary Increase 35,427
Total Justice Courts 4,850,906 42.00 - - 4,850,906 42.00 - - - - - -
Police:
FY21 Beginning Balance 70,347,769 648.00 8,749,563 63.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (1,745,264)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 270,501
Insurance rate changes 253,328
CCAC Adjustments [10 Months] 43,645
Merit Changes 865,184
1% Salary Increase 657,270
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - Emergency Manager (134,122) (1.00)
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - EM Training Program Specialist (114,849) (1.00)
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - EM Community Preparedness Coordinator (88,924) (1.00)
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - EM Multi Language Media Coordinator (98,918) (1.00)
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - EM Critical Infrastructure Liaison (89,608) (1.00)
BA#7 - Transfer to Fire - EM Operational Costs (107,294)
BA#7 - Social Worker Change 841,997
BA#7 - Encampment Cleanup 650,000
Versaterm contractual changes 39,391
Legislated Action Requiring Budget [10 Months] 60,833 1.00
Police Officer Mental Health Responder [10 Months] 100,000 1.00
Increased Public Mental Health Responders (Funding in Non Departmental)
[9@10 Months and 3@6 Months] 450,000 6.00 6.00
Street Racing Initiative 70,000 (450,000)
Police Staffing from the 2021 Holding Account (from Non Departmental) 2,800,000
Total Police 74,620,939 645.00 8,749,563 69.00 83,370,502 714.00 - 6.00 - - - 6.00
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Public Lands:
FY21 Beginning Balance - -
Living Wage Adjustment 21,230
Transfer Public Lands Division from Public Services Department (Personnel
Costs) 10,956,781 110.35
Transfer Public Lands Division from Public Services Department (Operational
Costs) 6,415,644
Public Lands Department Development [Ongoing] 536,583 4.00
Public Lands Department Development [One Time] 14,400
North Temple Grounds Keeper - 1.00
Public Lands New Properties/Amenities [Ongoing] 338,413 1.00
New Recreational Trail System [Ongoing] 304,167 2.00 (51,847) (1.00)
Contractual Increases 79,000
Utilities Increases 162,500
Total Public Lands 18,828,718 118.35 - - 18,828,718 118.35 (51,847) (1.00) - - (51,847) (1.00)
Public Services:
FY21 Beginning Balance 44,302,195 310.35 2,353,031 19.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget (57,548)
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 808,235
Insurance rate changes 124,784
Living Wage Adjustment 1,290
Merit Changes 260,156
1% Salary Increase 228,013
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Deputy Director (176,436) (1.00)
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Strategy and Special Projects Manager (100,714) (1.00)
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Innovations Team Support Budget (30,200)
Transfer Public Lands Division to Public Lands Department (Personnel Costs) (10,956,781) (110.35)
Transfer Public Lands Division to Public Lands Department (Operational Costs) (6,415,644)
Transfer Youth and Family Division to Community and Neighborhoods
Department (Personnel Costs) (1,812,153) (18.00)
Transfer Youth and Family Division to Community and Neighborhoods
Department (Operational Costs) (251,345)
Transfer Engineering Division from Community and Neighborhoods Department
(Personnel Costs) 4,864,910 44.00
Transfer Engineering Division from Community and Neighborhoods Department
(Operational Costs) 178,402
Engineer [9 Months] 92,255 1.00
Landscape Architect [9 Months] 169,833 2.00
Licensed Architect [9 Months] 88,477 1.00
Engineering Information and Records Specialist [9 Months] 42,375 1.00
Engineering New Position Increases 9,593
Contractual Increases 115,100
Utilities Increases 128,500
Budget and Management Analysis [Ongoing] 52,800
Concrete Road Maintenance Initiative [Ongoing] 80,000
Concrete Road Maintenance Initiative [One Time] 69,500
Streets Response Team FTE [Ongoing] 53,300 1.00
Increase 1/2 Asphalt Budget [Ongoing] 120,000
Two Public Fireworks Shows - removed due to extreme drought [One-time] (25,000)
Total Public Services 31,666,097 229.00 2,675,831 20.00 34,341,928 249.00 (25,000) - - - (25,000) -
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
911 Communications Bureau
FY21 Beginning Balance 8,260,571 100.00
FY22 Base personal services projection less FY21 budget 104,461
Restore 6 Months Vacancy Savings 171,250
Insurance rate changes 37,768
Merit Changes 98,566
1% Salary Increase 62,439
32 Hour Work Week Pilot Program [Extending Pilot Program from Six to 11
Months] 153,450 8.00 127,875
Total 911 Dispatch Bureau 8,735,055 100.00 153,450 8.00 8,888,505 108.00 - - 127,875 - 127,875 -
Non Departmental: Original Budget Changes Original Budget Changes
FY21 Beginning Balance
Governmental Transactions
Airport Trail Reimbursement 103,887 103,887
Fire SCBA 197,000 197,000
Police Body Cameras and Vehicle Integration 780,422 512,578 1,293,000 (93,000)
Axon Body Camera Services Enhancement 349,692
City Resident Bus Pass (HIVE) 1,260,000 1,260,000
Contract for Animal Services [BA#5 Contractual Adjustment $44,192] 1,866,295 44,192 1,910,487
Demographic Contract 50,000 50,000
Interest Expense for TRANS Bonding/Note 350,000 350,000 (350,000)
Jazz Festival - -
Jordan River Commission (Membership) 14,000 14,000
Municipal Elections - 275,000 275,000 (183,327)
2021 Ranked Choice Voting Public Awareness and Education Outreach (One-
time) 50,000
Retirement Payouts 635,000 61,000 696,000
Sorenson Center with County 1,014,800 1,014,800
Tuition Aid program 300,000 300,000
Washington D. C. Lobbyist 75,000 75,000
City Council Legislative Portion of Citywide Lobbyist 60,000
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Inter-Governmental Transfers
Capital Improvement Fund:
Debt Service Fund
Debt Service on Bonds 8,731,712 (1,089,332) 7,642,380
Debt Service on ESCO and Crime Lab Lease 877,105 19,395 896,500
Bond for ESCO Debt (55,399) 55,399 -
Debt Service Transfer to LBA for Fire Station Debt Service - -
Ongoing Commitments
Transfer to CIP for ongoing commitments 498,133 1,027,474 1,525,607
Facilities Capital Replacement 350,000 350,000
Parks Capital Replacement 250,000 250,000
New Projects 3,907,824 (446,842) 3,460,982 1,001,415
Capital Maintenance Fund (TBD)
Capital Improvement Projects Fund (TBD)
CIP Projects (TBD) 1,380,000 (100,000) 1,280,000
Infrastructure Projects (TBD) 2,400,000 (100,000) 2,300,000
Transit Plan - FTN Improvements (TBD) 1,100,000 (1,100,000) -
Council Identified - Underserved Neighborhoods & Communities of Color
[Remove One-Time] 1,669,138 (1,669,138) -
Triggered CIP from new growth - -
Transfer Out to CIP Fund Funding Our Future Transit Key Routes
Holding Account (One-time) 1,879,654
Fleet Fund:
Fleet - Replacement Fund 5,165,600 (65,600) 5,100,000
Streets Fleet Equipment Replacement 950,916 950,916
Fire Apparatus Replacement 4,000,000 4,000,000
Fire Emergency Management Vehicles 105,000 105,000
Public Service Concrete Maintenance Equipment 58,000 58,000
Public Services Engineering Position Increases Vehicles (2) 55,800 55,800
Fleet - Centralized Fleet Maintenance 6,303,103 315,600 138,500 6,757,203
Golf Fund:
Golf (Living Wage and CCAC Salary Adjustments Transfer) 246,000 124,100 370,100
Golf ESCO Payment Transfer [One-Time] FY2021 460,585 (460,585) -
Golf ESCO Payment Transfer [One-Time] FY2022 484,000 484,000
Golf ESCO Bonding Savings (34,601) 34,601 -
Golf Admin Fee Transfer 306,582 9,197 315,779
Golf IMS Fee Transfer 200,000 200,000
Golf Fund Balance Deficit Transfer [One Time] 500,000 500,000
Governmental Immunity Fund 2,767,963 2,767,963
Information Management Services Fund:
IMS Services 11,396,867 11,396,867
Budget Amendment Changes 715,729 80,054 795,783
Contractual Changes 577,803 577,803
Technical & Inflationary Increases 152,392 152,392
Initiatives 1,030,250 350,000 1,380,250
New positions 467,652 467,652
Insurance and Risk Management Fund 2,164,883 82,734 2,247,617
Public Utilities Funds:
Public Utilities (HIVE - Pass through expense) 61,000 61,000
Public Utilities - Land Swap payment - 200,000 200,000
GF Costs for Street lighting 50,000 50,000
GF Costs for Street Lighting in Enhanced Service Areas 54,420 54,420
SAA Street Lighting 20,000 20,000
Redevelopment Agency Fund 13,501,935 594,707 14,096,642
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Municipal Contributions & Civic Support
Mayor - Receptions/Employee Appreciation 20,000 20,000
ACE Fund 200,000 200,000
Board and Commissions honoraria [FY2021 REP Fund Balance] 26,000 26,000
Diversity Outreach (CoCs, etc.) 3,000 3,000
Fair Park Public Market from Underserved Neighborhoods Holding Account 1,000,000 1,000,000
Housing Authority Transitional Housing 85,000 85,000
Legal Defenders 1,292,774 1,292,774
Local Business Marketing Grants 20,000 20,000
Local First 20,000 20,000
Music Licensing Fees 7,000 7,000
National League of Cities and Towns 11,535 11,535
Rape Recovery Center 30,000 30,000
Sister Cities 10,000 10,000
Salary Contingency 1,613,986 1,613,986 1,505,068
Salt Lake City Arts Council (transferred to ED for PT Employees) 612,500 612,500 37,500
Salt Lake City Foundation - 3,000 3,000
SL Area Chamber of Commerce 50,000 50,000
Sugar House Park Authority 218,891 5,904 224,795
Tracy Aviary 674,922 674,922
US Conference of Mayors Membership 12,242 12,242
Utah Economic Development Corporation (Remove $30,000 Study [One-
Time]) 108,000 108,000
Utah Foundation Membership 10,000 10,000
Utah League of Cities and Towns Membership 160,684 160,684
ULCT ARPA Assistance (One-time) 20,000
World Trade Center Membership [BA#7 Addition] - 50,000 50,000
YWCA - FJC Wrap around services 45,000 45,000
Inn Between [One-Time] [Remove in FY2022] 30,000 (30,000) -
Transfer Out to RDA North Temple Project Area the remaining balance of
Investments in Underserved Neighborhoods Holding Account (One-time) 669,138
Police Department and Racial Equity In Policing Funding
Police Officer Training [One-Time $150,400] 322,800 (117,400) 205,400
Social Worker Program [BA#7 - Correct Accounting Error] 2,411,727 (1,589,008) 139,390 962,109
Increased Mental Health Responders (Funding in Non Departmental) [9@10
Months and 3@6 Months] 450,000 450,000 562,500
Community Connections Center Lease and/or Repairs and Remodel (One-
time) 200,000
Diversifying Public Safety Civilian Response Models Holding Account 2,001,608
Racial Equity in Policing [moved to Police Department $] 2,800,000 (2,800,000) -
Commission of Racial Equity & Policing 100,000 20,000 120,000
REP Commission Senior Staff Position [FY2021 REP Fund Balance] 190,000 190,000
REP Commission Peer Court Support [FY2021 REP Fund Balance] 20,000 20,000
REP FY2021 Holding Account [FY2021 REP Fund Balance] 1,970,000 1,970,000 314,899
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
ISSUE
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
Council Changes to MRB
General Fund Sales Tax Option TOTAL FY2022 Budget
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES
Sales Tax Option - Housing Plan
Housing Plan - Build a more equitable City (move to CAN-HAND $388,000) 300,000 (300,000) -
Housing Plan - Community Land Trust (Eliminated) 500,000 (500,000) -
Housing Plan - Expanded Housing Opportunity Program - Landlord Insurance
(move to CAN-HAND $53,000) 350,000 (350,000) -
Housing Plan - Incentivized Rent Assistance (move to CAN-HAND $671,620) 900,000 (900,000) -
Housing Plan - Mortgage Assistance (move to CAN-HAND $50,000) 500,000 (500,000) -
Housing Plan - Land Discounts and Financing (transfer to RDA) 2,590,000 2,590,000
Housing Plan - Marketing home ownership programs (move to CAN_HAND
$300,000) 300,000 (300,000) -
Housing Plan - Service Models for most vulnerable (move to CAN-HAND
$525,380) 200,000 (200,000) -
Sales Tax Option - Transit Plan
Transit Plan - Key Routes 4,700,000 (200,000) 4,500,000
Transit Plan - On Demand Ride Services (Smaller Service Area) - 1,100,000 1,100,000
Transit Plan - Bus Service Mobilization for 1000 North bus route - 1,101,319 1,101,319
Transit Plan - UTA Outreach 100,000 100,000
Total Non Departmental 75,295,329 3,063,010 16,110,468 3,540,289 98,009,096 4,143,885 - 3,881,262 - 8,025,147 -
Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE Amount FTE
General Fund Total Expenses and Other Uses Budget 315,226,108 1,910.35 34,512,447 105.00 349,738,555 1,897.00 4,592,044 7.00 4,009,137 - 8,601,181 7.00
Balanced budget (1,837,553) 1,837,553 (0) - - -
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
CIP Fund (FC 83)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 24,420,242
Eliminate FY2021 GF funding (Including Funding Our Future, less Debt Service and LBA Transfer)(15,782,971)
Eliminate FY2021 Class C funding (3,000,000)
Eliminate FY2021 Impact fee funding (5,058,011)
Eliminate FY2021 funding from additional sources (579,260)
Transfer In from General Fund Nondepartmental Funding Our Future
Transit Key Routes Holding Account (One-time)1,879,654
FY2022 GF Funding (Excluding transfer directly to Debt Service;
includes one-time $155,709 recaptured General Fund dollars from
completed projects)14,125,469 1,157,124
FY2022 General Fund Funding our Future 3,580,000
FY2022 Less amount transferred directly to debt service including
LBA (8,538,880)
FY2022 Class C Funding (Excluding transfer directly to Debt Service;
includes one-time $208,981 recaptured funding from completed
projects)3,021,706 208,981
FY2022 Impact Fee Funding (Excluding transfer directly to LBA Debt
Service)8,276,103
FY2022 ¼¢ Sales Tax Funding 4,900,000
FY2022 Community Development Block Grant 322,000
FY2022 Funding from additional sources 571,059
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,837,215 26,257,457 5,082,974 31,340,431
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 25,093,221
Eliminate FY2021 Ongoing Commitment Funding (1,522,687)
Eliminate FY2021 Maintenance Funding (2,948,507)
Eliminate FY2021 Capital Projects Funding (11,472,697)
Eliminate FY2021 Class C Funding (2,046,329)
Eliminate FY2021 Streets Impact Fee Funding (4,177,733)
Eliminate FY2021 Cost Overrun and Percent for Art (263,634)
Eliminate FY2021 Transfer to Debt Service (154,706)
Eliminate FY2021 Transfer to Debt Service - Class C (953,671)
Eliminate FY2021 Transfer to Debt Service/LBA - Impact Fees Fire (880,278)
Eliminate FY2021 Transfer to General Fund (Completed CIP Project
Funding)(422,979)
Eliminate FY2021 Transfer Out from City Daycare Project to GF (250,000)
FY2022 Ongoing Commitment Funding 1,583,423
FY2022 Maintenance Funding GF, Funding our Future 300,000
FY2022 Maintenance Funding ¼¢ Sales Tax 400,000
600 North Corridor Transformation (One-time)1,879,654
FY2022 Capital Projects Funding 7,425,520 1,157,124
FY2022 Class C Funding 2,046,329 208,981
FY2022 Streets Impact Fees Funding 491,520
FY2022 Parks Impact Fees Funding 6,800,450
FY2022 ¼¢ Sales Tax Funding 4,500,000
FY2022 Community Development Block Grant 322,000
Cost Overrun and Percent for art 280,200
Transfer to Debt Service - General Fund 148,505
Transfer to Debt Service - Class C 975,377
Transfer to Debt Service/LBA Impact Fees Fire 984,133
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,164,236 26,257,457 4,409,995 30,667,452
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0 672,979
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,000
Change in Special Assessment Fees 0
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 0 3,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 0 3,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
Misc. Special Service Districts (FC 46)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 1,550,000
Change in revenue from New Assessment 0
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 0 1,550,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 1,550,000
Change in expense from New Assessment 0
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 0 1,550,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Street Lighting Enterprise Fund (FC 48)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance-base lighting 4,286,798
Street lighting fees (126,729)
Reduction in interest income 32,500
Reduction in other revenues (1,800)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (96,029)4,190,769
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance-base lighting 5,379,697 1.52
Personnel services 1.20 133,223
Charges for service 185,040
Debt services 1,703
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2.72 319,966 5,699,663
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (1,508,894)
Water Utility (FC 51)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 120,657,632
Metered water sales 15,850,038
Interest income (317,896)
Other revenue (36,486)
Impact fees 600,000
Aid to construction from development (22,020)
Sale of equipment (94,760)
Bond proceeds (16,089,000)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (110,124)120,547,508
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 126,333,193 270.22
Personnel services 6.51 2,753,856
Operating & maintenance 50,128
Charges for service 3,770,278
Capital outlay 906,945
Capital improvements (8,330,000)
Cost of bond issuance (89,000)
Debt services 1,970,155
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 276.73 1,032,362 127,365,555
Budgeted revenues and other sources over (6,818,047)
(under) expenditures and other uses
Sewer (FC 52)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 199,230,301
Sewer utility service revenue 7,819,937
Interest income (821,301)
Other revenues 0
Impact fees 0
Aid to construction from development (583,177)
Other sources 0
WIFIA Loan 680,000
Bond Proceeds 72,402,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 79,497,459 278,727,760
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 212,638,399 122.01
Personnel services 4.54 209,462
Operating & maintenance 76,074
Charges for service 1,072,403
Capital outlay 655,164
Capital improvements 49,793,413
Cost of bond issuance 402,000
Debt services 3,366,881
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 126.55 55,575,397 268,213,796
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 10,513,964
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Storm Water Utility (FC 53)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 10,746,170
Stormwater utility service revenue 974,050
Interest income (80,470)
Other operating revenues 3,000
Sale of equipment (4,000)
Bond Proceeds 6,160,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 7,052,580 17,798,750
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 17,961,860 34.82
Personnel services 4.75 586,853
Operating & maintenance 3,600
Charges for service (59,570)
Capital outlay (164,000)
Capital improvements 587,500
Cost of bond issuance 34,200
Debt Service 250,570
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 39.57 1,239,153 19,201,013
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (1,402,263)
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 274,891,999
Change in operating revenues 1,506,500
Change in passenger facility charges 0
Change in grants and reimbursements (377,000)
Change in customer facility charges (618,000)
Change in airport general revenue bonds 0
Change in interest income (17,413,900)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (16,902,400)257,989,599
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 302,311,600 610.80
Increase in operating expenses 24,361,800
Decrease in Passenger Incentive Rebate (5,702,200)
Increase in interest expense 12,244,600
Increase in capital equipment 4,093,700
Increase in capital improvements projects 369,483,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 610.80 404,480,900 706,792,500
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (448,802,901)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Refuse (FC 57)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 12,601,294
Refuse Collection Revenues 0
Other Misc. Revenues (6,484)
Recycling Proceeds 0
Landfill (SLVSWMF) dividends (42,500)
Sale of equipment and vehicles 85,000
Principal & Interest for CIK Loan Repayment (0)
Finance Proceeds for Equip Purchases (see corresponding expense) 5,676,289
FY22 Waste & Recycling Can Collection 8% Fee Increase 1,189,716
FY22 Transfer from GF to Refuse Fund E&E to cover revenue shortfall 440,000
FY22 C‐REP Multiple Anchor Community Participation Contribution Funds 275,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 7,617,021 20,218,315
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 16,515,438 63.00
Financed vehicle purchases (see corresponding revenue) 5,708,289
Lease payments for equipment purchases 826,383
Fleet maintenance 246,000
Fleet fuel (5,000)
Tipping fees (482,288)
Personal services base to base changes 92,151
Personal services salary increase 54,530
Personal services insurance, pension changes 34,152
Personal services overtime/other 4,092
IMS Network & Admin Costs 232,530
PUBS Billing Allocation Costs 52,124
Misc operational expenses 337,432
Remove FY21 One-time Sustainability Projects Budget (175,000)
FY22 C-REP SLC Anchor City Contractual Participation Expense 275,000
FY22 Sustainability Projects New Requests 655,000
FY22 Waste & Recycling Call-to-Haul Program Enhancement 30,000
FY22 Waste & Recycling Delong Yard Facility Improvements (Asphalt $85K, Modular Dock $210K) 295,000
FY22 Sustainability Ongoing Hourly Position 1040 Hours 17,672
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 63.00 8,198,067 24,713,505
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (4,495,190)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Golf Fund - Operations (FC 59)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 8,307,092
Green Fees 213,562
Driving Range 4,780
Cart Rental 5,300
Retail Sales (33,455)
Other 15,708
General Fund Transfer (IMS, Admin Fees)205,693
Debt Proceeds - Lease Capital 768,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,179,588 9,486,680
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 7,687,696 34.65
Eliminate Assistant Professional Position (1.00) (74,720)
Personal Services adjustments from organizational changes 3,127
Personal Services (COLA, Living Wage Increases)170,932
Retail Merchandise 6,088
Operating Supplies 36,180
Increase for Utilities 62,950
Charges and Services 106,680
City Charges (IMS, Admin Fees)16,593
Debt Service Payments (Carts)(58,153)
Operating Equipment Cash Purchases 257,575
Equipment Lease Capital 768,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 33.65 1,295,252 8,982,948
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 503,732
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Golf Fund - CIP Dedicated (FC 59)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 732,264
Green Fees 5,720
Green Fees ($1 per 9 hole increase)124,800
Transfer from GF for ESCO 50,649
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 181,169 913,433
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 797,201
Debt Service Payments (ESCO)50,649
Capital Expenditures (133,381)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget - (82,732)714,469
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 198,964
Emergency 911 (FC 60)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,925,000
No Change 0
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 0 3,925,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,789,270
Remove CAD to CAD One-Time Funding from FY2021 (117,145)
Remove Emergency Notifications System One-Time Funding for FY2021 (22,125)
CAD-to-CAD Sharing 85,010
Versaterm Data Sharing Hub 26,200
NICE Radio Logger Upgrade - Vesta 30,765
Motorola NICE Redundant GP Server 63,218
APCO IntelliComm Software 201,663
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 267,586 4,056,856
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (131,856)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Fleet Management (FC 61) - Maintenance
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 12,616,184
Car Wash billing increase 6,000
Fuel revenue impact 100,382
Work Order billings 501,183
Loaner pool budget moved to Maintenance budget 2,400
Other revenue - now must pay to discard recycled oil and adj scrap metal sales (41,411)
Adding back operational cut 246,580
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 815,134 13,431,318
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 12,596,994 45.00
FY21 Base personal service adjustments (101,061)
Salary Increase and Merit changes 37,825
Increase in health insurance 49,676
Annual fuel calibrations on fuel dispensing equipment 7,500
Annual fuel upgrades 50,000
Fuel impact 108,282
Increase for IMS charges 99,125
Increase for utilities 10,185
Increase in City charges (IMS, Admin Fees)15,134
Loaner pool budget moved from Replacement budget 27,069
Miscellaneous (41,490)
Moved GPS expense to Fleet from GF 179,600
Parts 3% increase 133,467
Adding back operational cut 246,580
Total Expenses and Other Uses Budget 45.00 821,892 13,418,886
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 12,432
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Fleet Management (FC 61) - Replacement
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 6,461,809
Increased leased purchases to stay under $4M debt service cap 2,000,000
Transfer from GF for Debt Service (292,654)
Transfer from GF for Replacement of Vehicles 5,504,370
Streets Funding our Future purchases 58,000
Vehicle sales at auctions 212,975
Estimated VW Grant Revenue & Expense 564,589
Loaner pool moved to Fleet Maintenance (2,400)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 8,044,880 14,506,689
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 6,612,277
Capital outlay with cash, including UC cars 599,696
Debt Service - Current year lease purchases reduced $2.3M to stay under $4M debt service limit 250,139
Debt Service - Prior Years (542,792)
New vehicle prep, parts, outsourced labor & admin 205,934
Funding our Future - Public Safety vehicles 4,000,000
Funding our Future - Streets vehicles 950,916
Streets Funding our Future purchases 58,000
Increased leased purchases to stay under $4M debt service cap 2,000,000
Estimated VW Grant Revenue & Expense 564,589
Loaner pool moved to Fleet Maintenance fund (27,069)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget - 8,059,413 14,671,690
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (165,001)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Information Management Services (FC 65)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 17,345,710
Change in Transfer from General Fund 3,373,880
Change in Transfer from Transportation 215,869
Change in Transfer from Public Utilities 1,251,699
Change in Transfer from Airport Fund 2,295,374
Change in Payment from Redevelopment Agency 25,839
Change in Transfer from Sustainability Fund 223,554
Change in Transfer from Golf Fund (195,967)
Change in Transfer from Fleet Fund 139,161
Change in Transfer from Risk Fund (33,506)
Change in Transfer from Governmental Immunity Fund 3,511
Change in Payment from Library (340,884)
One-Time Fund Balance Transfer from GF (54,000)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 6,904,530 24,250,240
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 18,289,687 69.00
Change in Personnel Expense 206,788
Budget Amendment Changes
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Mgr 1.00 105,920
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Specialist 1.00 80,054
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Specialist 1.00 83,930
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Civic Engagement Specialist 1.00 90,916
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Deputy Director 1.00 176,436
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Strategy and Special Projects Manager 1.00 100,714
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Strategy and Special Projects Manager 1.00 100,714
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Innovations Team Support Budget 30,200
BA#6 - Transfer to IMS - Innovations Team Support Budget 53,400
BA#7 - Transfer to IMS - GIS Programmer Analyst 1.00 106,458
BA#7 - Transfer to IMS - GIS Programmer Analyst 1.00 108,646
Contractual Changes
- ERP Software Subscription 750,000
- Microsoft Additional Licensing 54,855
- Various Software Contracts 324,536
Technical & Inflationary Increases
- Administrative Fees 95,000
- Software Support Services 24,449
- ESRI Advantage Program 65,000
- Penetration Testing 50,000
Initiatives
- ERP Software Implementation 2,000,000
- Website Enhancements 125,000
- Server Infrastructure 180,000
- PSB Network Infrastructure (FOF)350,000
New Positions
- ERP Conversion Manager 1.00 164,756
- Network Engineer - Cyber Security 1.00 122,236
- Network Engineer - Unified Communications [10 Months] 1.00 122,236
- Software Services - Data Engineer [9 Months] 1.00 127,404
- Network Engineer - Enterprise Backup and Wireless [10 Months] 1.00 122,236
- Civic Engagement Specialist 1.00 90,916
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 84.00 6,012,800 24,302,487
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (52,247)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC69)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 7,571,945
Remove Appropriation of Fund Balance (3,104,945)
Change in revenue 1,033,000
County local option sales tax from State FY21 1,100,000
County local option sales tax from State FY22 1,100,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 128,055 7,700,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 7,571,945
Personnel Changes 7,142
Remove Appropriation of Fund Balance (3,104,945)
Remove FY2021 One Time Project Funding (4,067,000)
Transfer to CIP 4,900,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (2,264,803)5,307,142
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 2,392,858
CDBG Operating (FC 71)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,509,164
Change in Federal Funds 1,832,168
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,832,168 5,341,332
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 3,509,164
Change in Federal Funds 582,168
Transfer to Housing 1,250,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,832,168 5,341,332
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Misc. Grants Operating (FC 72)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 8,261,044
Change in Federal Grant Revenue (21,851)
Change in Program Income 0
Change in Appropriation of Cash (5,186,016)
American Rescue Plan 13,884,794
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 8,676,927 16,937,971
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 8,261,044
Change in Approved Grant Expenditures (5,207,867)
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Grant
- Revenue Replacement [Transfer Out to General Fund] 10,000,000 1,432,646
- Special Projects Assistant for Community Commitment Program (CAN) 1.00 93,829
- Associate Planners 3.00 235,000 (3.00) (235,000)
- Transportation Right of Way Utilization Manager 1.00 160,000 (1.00) (160,000)
- Youth & Family Community and Program Manager (from BA#2) (CAN) 1.00 90,633
- Youth & Family COVID Programming Continuation (CAN) 711,350
- Arts Council Staffing & Operational Costs (Economic Development) 3.00 350,000 (3.00) (350,000)
- Business & Cultural Districts (Economic Development) 1.00 150,000 (1.00) (150,000)
- Economic Development Strategic Plan (Economic Development) 50,000
- Economic Development Staff (Economic Development) 2.00 290,000
- TechLakeCity (Economic Development)45,000 (45,000)
- Construction Mitigation 200,000 (200,000)
- American Express Card Merchant Fees (Finance) 40,000 (40,000)
- Grant Administrator (Finance) 1.00 101,020
- Grant Manager (Finance)1.00 95,000
- Business Analyst (Finance)1.00 89,500 (1.00) (89,500)
- Apprenticeship Program (All Departments)1,000,000
- MRT Expansion [6 Months] (Fire) 4.00 136,762
- MRT Expansion [One-Time $46,700] (Fire)46,700
- Forest Preservation and Growth Program 1.00 219,000 (1.00) (219,000)
- Forest Preservation and Growth [One-Time]95,000 (95,000)
ARPA Holding Account (One-time)1,583,500
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 8,676,927 16,937,971 (10.00) 1,432,646.00
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Other Special Revenue Fund (FC73)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 0
Appropriation of Cash 273,797
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 273,797 273,797
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 0
Change in Expenditures 273,797
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 273,797 273,797
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
Donation Fund (FC 77)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,380,172
Change in Revenue 500,000
Change in Revenue from GUCOA (127,607)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 372,393 2,752,565
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,380,172
Change in Transfer to GF 500,000
Change in GUCOA Expense (127,607)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 372,393 2,752,565
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Housing (FC 78)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 20,339,000
Change in Transfer from GF 0
Change in Transfer from GF for FOF (5,640,000)
Change in Transfer from CDBG 250,000
Change in Federal Grant Income 0
Change in Program Income 390,000
Change in Interest Income (616,700)
Change in Miscellaneous Income/Sale of Property 42,000
Change in Appropriation of Cash (479,300)
Change in Loan Principal and Escrow Payments (1,156,000)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (7,210,000)13,129,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 23,248,016
Change in Loan Disbursements and Associated Expenses (5,996,016)
Change in Funding Our Futures Expenses (5,640,000)
Change in Other Expenses (100,000)
Change in Interest Expense (40,000)
Change in Note Payable & T&I Payments 59,000
Change in Transfer to General Fund 750,000
Change in Transfer to RDA Fund 2,590,000
Change in Transfer to CDBG Fund 1,250,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (7,127,016)16,121,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (2,992,000)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Debt Service (FC 81)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 35,118,583 35,118,583
Change in G. O Property Tax (3,880,797) (3,880,797)
Change in Debt Service from RDA 44,213 44,213
Change in Debt Service from Internal Transfers 0 0
Change in Transfer from General Fund (1,011,168) (1,011,168)
Change in Transfer from CIP (154,750) (154,750)
Change in Transfer from Refuse (340)(340)
Change in Transfer from Fleet (318)(318)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (5,003,160)30,115,423 (5,003,160)30,115,423
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 37,519,401 37,519,401
Change in Debt Service Payments and related expenses (6,668,978) (6,668,978)
Transfer Out from North Temple Viaduct Bond RDA Reimbursement
to North Temple Project Area 1,000,000 1,000,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (6,668,978)30,850,423 (5,668,978)31,850,423
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (735,000) (1,735,000)
Government Immunity (FC 85)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,787,963
Change in transfers in
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 0 2,787,963
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,855,203 8.50 78,710
Change in Personnel Expense 0.50 0
Change in Other Expense 0
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 9.00 78,710 2,933,913
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (145,950)
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
COUNCIL CHANGES
Insurance and Risk Management (FC 87)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 48,432,623
Change in transfers in 416,347
Insurance Changes 2,573,614
Change in transfer from the General Fund 82,734
Premium Holiday (One-time)1,438,025
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 3,072,695 51,505,318
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 51,409,025 6.10
Change in Personnel Expense 20,716
BA#4 HR Director (.15)0.15 26,615
HR Supervisor - Insurance [10 months] 1.00 108,950
Claims/Admin Assistant [10 Months] 0.50 61,987
Change in Health Insurance 2,573,614
Change in Property Insurance Premium & Excess Premium 166,280
Change in Brokerage Fee 25,000
Change in Comm Crime Bonds & Cyber Liability 18,927
Change in SDI Admin Fee 5,124
Change in Overhead Expenses (38,724)
Remove Fund Balance Transfer for FY2021 (2,876,049)
Transfer out of Fund Balance for Premium Holiday FY2022 1,438,025
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 7.75 1,530,464 52,939,489
Budgeted revenues and other sources over (1,434,171)
(under) expenditures and other uses
Total Revenue Budget 1,327,017,931
Total Expense Budget 1,729,140,012
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
Central Business District
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 25,066,500 2,506,650 27,573,150
Interest Income 300,000 50,000 350,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 25,366,500 2,556,650 27,923,150 25,366,500 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Taxing Entity Payment (60%) 15,039,900 1,503,990 16,543,890
Eccles Debt Service Block 70 RDA Match 2,638,112 469,628 3,107,740
Transfer to Administration 2,506,650 250,665 2,757,315
Commercial Development Loan Program 250,000 (250,000) -
Miscellaneous Property Expense 800,000 175,000 975,000
TI Reimbursement Jazz Arena 700,000 107,710 807,710
Gallivan Maintenance 528,543 (5,405) 523,138
TI Reimbursement 222 South Main 500,000 169,688 669,688
Gallivan Programming 200,000 50,000 250,000
Gallivan Administration 351,492 (11,010) 340,482
Eccles Debt Service Reserve 1,537,449 262,551 1,800,000
Parking Ramp Leases 64,355 - 64,355
Capital Expenditures - Japantown
-{Holding Account}-250,000 (250,000) -
Capital Expenditures - Storefront Revitalization
-{Holding Account}-- 83,832 83,832
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 25,366,500 2,556,650 27,923,150 25,366,500 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
West Capitol Hill
Revenue and Other Sources
Interest Income 100,000 50,000 150,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 100,000 50,000 150,000 100,000 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Transfer to Administration 100,000 50,000 150,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 100,000 50,000 150,000 100,000 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
West Temple Gateway
Revenue and Other Sources
Interest Income 50,000 - 50,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Transfer to Administration 50,000 - 50,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
Depot District
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 3,844,278 76,886 3,921,164
Interest Income 180,000 20,000 200,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,024,278 96,886 4,121,164 4,024,278 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
TI Reimbursement Gateway 1,200,000 65,520 1,265,520
Primary Housing Fund 768,856 15,377 784,233
Capital Expenditures - 100 S Utilities
-{Holding Account}-388,981 (388,981) -
Capital Expenditures - Station Center Infrastructure
-{Holding Account}-- 332,179 332,179
Transfer to Administration 576,642 11,533 588,175
Grant Tower Debt Service 275,800 (200) 275,600
TI Reimbursement Alta Gateway 260,000 119,960 379,960
TI Reimbursement Homewood Suites 110,000 (4,064) 105,936
Miscellaneous Property Expense 100,000 20,000 120,000
TI Reimbursement Cowboy Partners Liberty Gateway 94,000 (24,439) 69,561
TI Reimbursement Cicero 50,000 (50,000) -
Capital Expenditures - Environmental Remediation Sites 3 & 4
-{Holding Account}-200,000 - 200,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 4,024,278 96,885 4,121,163 4,024,278 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0 -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
Granary District
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 608,945 12,179 621,124
Interest Income 40,000 5,000 45,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 648,945 17,179 666,124 648,945 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Adaptive Reuse loan program
-{Holding Account}-396,814 (396,814) -
Capital Expenditures - Community/Cultural Initiative
-{Holding Account}-- 443,731 443,731
Primary Housing Fund 121,789 2,436 124,225
Transfer to Administration 91,342 1,827 93,169
TI Reimbursement Artspace Commons 34,000 (34,000) -
Miscellaneous Property Expense 5,000 - 5,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 648,945 17,180 666,124 648,945 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (0) -
North Temple
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 426,810 8,536 435,346
Interest Income 14,000 1,000 15,000
Transfer In from Primary Housing Fund (One-time)1,000,000 1,000,000
Transfer In from Debt Service Fund Class 81 North Temple Viaduct
Bond RDA Reimbursement (One-time)1,000,000 1,000,000
Transfer In from General Fund Investments in Underserved
Neighborhoods Holding Account (One-time)669,138 669,138
Transfer In from Program Income Fund North Temple Catalytic
Project Holding Account (One-time)255,215 255,215
Use of North Temple Catalytic Project Holding Account (One-time)788,037 788,037
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 440,810 9,536 450,346 440,810 3,712,390 3,712,390
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Expenditures - Catalytic Project
-{Holding Account}-270,086 19,182 289,268 (289,268) (289,268)
Primary Housing Fund 85,362 1,707 87,069
Capital Expenditures - 10% School Construction Fund
-{Holding Account}-42,681 (12,207) 30,474
Transfer to Administration 42,681 854 43,535
North Temple Strategic Intervention Fund
-{Holding Account}-4,001,658 4,001,658
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 440,810 9,536 450,346 440,810 3,712,390 3,712,390
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (0) -
Block 70
Revenue and Other Sources
Private Fundraising 800,000 (800,000) -
Transfer From CBD Taxing Entity Payments 4,043,171 66,029 4,109,200
Transfer From CBD Eccles Debt Service RDA match 2,638,112 469,628 3,107,740
Transfer from CBD Eccles Debt Service Reserve Account 1,537,449 262,551 1,800,000
Tax Increment 1,884,631 37,693 1,922,323
Interest Income 50,000 (50,000) -
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 10,953,363 (14,099) 10,939,263 10,953,363 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Eccles Theater Debt Service 8,070,927 (2,718) 8,068,209
Reserve for Eccles Debt Service 480,959 (390,342) 90,617
Regent Street Bond Debt Service 981,087 467,653 1,448,740
Taxing Entity Payments (30%) 565,390 11,307 576,697
Fundraising Fulfillment 150,000 (50,000) 100,000
Eccles Theater- Operating Reserve for Ancillary Spaces 475,000 - 475,000
Property and Liability Insurance 50,000 (50,000) -
Regent Street Parking Structure Capital Reserves
-{Holding Account}-100,000 - 100,000
Regent Street Maintenance 80,000 - 80,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 10,953,363 (14,100) 10,939,263 10,953,363 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0 -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
North Temple Viaduct
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 1,158,313 23,166 1,181,479
Interest Income 1,500 6,000 7,500
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,159,813 29,166 1,188,979 1,159,813 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Debt Service Payment to Salt Lake City 1,142,438 28,819 1,171,257
Transfer to Admin 17,375 347 17,722
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,159,813 29,166 1,188,979 1,159,813 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
Northwest Quadrant
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment - 1,500,000 1,500,000 -
Interest Income - - - - - -
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - -
Expenses and Other Uses
TI Reimbursement NWQ Phase I - 500,000 500,000 -
Transfer to Secondary Housing - 350,000 350,000 -
Shared Costs
-{Holding Account}-- 350,000 350,000 -
Transfer to Primary Housing - 150,000 150,000 -
Transfer to Admin - 150,000 150,000 -
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
Stadler Rail
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment - 71,000 71,000 -
Interest Income - - - - - -
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget - 71,000 71,000 - - -
Expenses and Other Uses
TI Reimbursement - 56,800 56,800 -
Transfer to Primary Housing - 7,100 7,100 -
Transfer to Admin - 7,100 7,100 -
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget - 71,000 71,000 - - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
Revolving Loan Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
FY17 Beginning Balance
Interest on Investment 470,000 - 470,000
Principal Payments 275,000 (220,000) 55,000
Interest on Loans 107,000 (82,000) 25,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 852,000 (302,000) 550,000 852,000 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Available to Lend 852,000 (302,000) 550,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 852,000 (302,000) 550,000 852,000 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
Program Income Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
Parking Structure Income 1,242,335 - 1,242,335
Rents 315,000 (99,300) 215,700
Interest Income 250,000 - 250,000
Loan Repayments 88,000 (60,000) 28,000
Interest on Loans 10,500 (4,000) 6,500
Use of North Temple Catalytic Project Holding Account (One-time)255,215 255,215
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,905,835 (163,300) 1,742,535 1,905,835 255,215 255,215
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Expenditures - Commercial Revitalization Program
-{Holding Account}-- 667,535 667,535
Professional Services 299,009 991 300,000
Miscellaneous Property Expense 300,000 - 300,000
Capital Expenditures - Sustainability Technical Assistance Program
-{Holding Account}-- 200,000 200,000
Transfer to Administration 176,611 (176,611) -
Marketing and Sales 25,000 - 25,000
Project Area Seed Funds 505,215 (505,215) -
Capital Expenditures - Gallivan Repairs
-{Holding Account}-250,000 - 250,000
Capital Expenditures - Project Area Art
-{Holding Account}-250,000 (250,000) -
Project Area Creation 100,000 (100,000) -
Transfer Out to North Temple Project Area (One-time)255,215 255,215
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,905,835 (163,300) 1,742,535 1,905,835 255,215 255,215
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
Secondary Housing Fund (formerly Project Area Housing Fund)
Revenue and Other Sources
Interest Income 44,000 - 44,000
Transfer from NWQ - 350,000 350,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 44,000 350,000 394,000 44,000 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Expenditures - Housing Development Loan Program
-{Holding Account}-394,000 (394,000)
Infill Housing Development 44,000 (44,000) -
Capital Expenditures - Accessory Dwelling Unit Program
-{Holding Account}-394,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 44,000 (44,000) 394,000 44,000 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
Primary Housing Fund (formerly Citywide Housing Fund)
Revenue and Other Sources
Transfer from Depot 768,856 15,377 784,233
Interest Income 225,000 - 225,000
Transfer from NWQ - - 150,000
Transfer from Granary 121,789 2,436 124,225
Loan Repayments 82,547 (31,547) 51,000
Interest on Loans 80,225 (10,225) 70,000
Transfer from Stadler Rail - 7,100 7,100
Transfer from North Temple 85,362 1,707 87,069
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,363,779 (15,152) 1,498,627 1,363,779 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Housing NOFA 1,363,779 (1,363,779) -
Housing Development Loan Program
-{Holding Account}-- 498,627 498,627
Strategic Site Acquisition
-{Holding Account}-- 1,000,000 1,000,000 (1,000,000) (1,000,000)
Transfer Out to North Temple Project Area (One-time)1,000,000 1,000,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,363,779 134,848 1,498,627 1,363,779 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (0) -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
NWQ Housing Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
UIPA Housing Allocation - 250,000 250,000 -
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget - 250,000 250,000 -
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Expenditures - Accessory Dwelling Unit Program
-{Holding Account}-- 250,000 250,000 - (250,000) (250,000)
Westside Urban Land Fund -{Holding Account}-250,000 250,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget - 250,000 250,000 - - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
Housing Development Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
Funding Our Future Land Discounts and Financing 2,590,000 - 2,590,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 2,590,000 - 2,590,000 2,590,000 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
Housing Development Loan Program
-{Holding Account}-2,590,000 - 2,590,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2,590,000 - 2,590,000 2,590,000 - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses - -
FUND
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Recommended
Budget
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES BOARD CHANGES
Administration
Revenue and Other Sources
Transfer from Central Business District 2,506,650 250,665 2,757,315
Transfer from Depot District 576,642 11,533 588,175
Transfer from West Capitol Hill 100,000 50,000 150,000
Transfer from Granary District 91,342 1,827 93,169
Transfer from West Temple Gateway 50,000 - 50,000
Transfer from North Temple 42,681 854 43,535
Transfer From Program Income Fund 176,610 (176,610) -
Transfer from North Temple Viaduct 17,375 347 17,722
Transfer from Northwest Quadrant - 150,000 150,000
Transfer from Stadler Rail - 7,100 7,100
Transfer from FC77 1,171,996 (1,171,996) -
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,733,296 (876,281) 3,857,015 4,733,296 - -
Expenses and Other Uses
RDA Personnel 2,100,484 19 154,148 2,254,632
Gallivan Personnel 1,171,996 13 (1,171,996) -
Administrative Fees 800,000 139,683 939,683
Operating & Maintenance 308,116 51,884 360,000
Charges and Services 202,700 - 202,700
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment 150,000 (50,000) 100,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 4,733,296 32 (876,281) 3,857,015 4,733,296 - - -
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (0) -
TOTAL Revenue 54,232,619 57,942,203 54,232,619 3,967,605
TOTAL Expense 54,232,619 57,942,203 54,232,619 3,967,605
CIP Allocations detailed on Cap Projects tab 4,738,562 7,679,646 - (1,933,268)
Appropriation of Fund Balance - - - -
GRAND TOTALS
FY2021
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2021
Budget
FY2022
Budget
Local Building Authority (FC66)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,219,250
Change in Building Lease Revenue 3,975
Change in Transfers In 295,997
Appropriation of Cash (298,297)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,675 2,220,925
Expenses and Other Uses
FY21 Beginning Balance 2,219,250
Change in Debt Service (1,125)
Change in Project Costs 2,800
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,675 2,220,925
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 00
LBA KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
FY2020
Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2020
Budget
FY2021
Budget
Multi-Agency Drug Task Force (FC41)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY20 Beginning Balance 1,763,746
Remove FY2021 Funding (1,763,746)
Appropriation of Cash Balance from Forfeiture 1,567,118
Appropriation of Cash Balance from Restitution 466,455
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 269,827 2,033,573
Expenses and Other Uses
FY20 Beginning Balance 1,763,746
Remove FY2021 Expense (1,763,746)
Change in Operating Expense 2,033,573
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 269,827 2,033,573
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
MULTI-AGENCY DRUG TASK FORCE KEY CHANGES
ISSUE
Budget Budget Budget FY 21-22
DEPARTMENT 2019-20 2020-21 2021-2022 Variance
GENERAL FUND
Attorney's Office 50.25 50.25 55.25 5.00
City Council 35.00 35.00 35.00 0.00
911 Communications Bureau 100.00 100.00 108.00 8.00
Community and Neighborhood 204.00 204.00 176.00 (28.00)
Economic Development 16.00 18.00 18.00 0.00
Department of Finance 69.70 69.70 71.70 2.00
Fire 366.00 366.00 374.00 8.00
Human Resources 22.05 21.20 26.05 4.85
Justice Courts 44.00 42.00 42.00 0.00
Mayor's Office 24.00 26.00 30.00 4.00
Police 711.00 711.00 720.00 9.00
Public Lands 0.00 0.00 117.35 117.35
Public Services 341.35 329.35 249.00 (80.35)
Non Departmental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 1983.35 1972.50 2022.35 49.85
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Airport 563.80 610.80 610.80 0.00
Golf 34.65 34.65 33.65 (1.00)
Public Utilities 427.00 435.00 452.00 17.00
Sustainability 63.00 63.00 63.00 0.00
ENTERPRISE FUND
TOTAL 1088.45 1143.45 1159.45 16.00
INTERNAL SERVICE AND OTHER FUNDS
Information Mgmt Svcs 71.00 69.00 84.00 15.00
Fleet Management 45.00 45.00 45.00 0.00
Government Immunity 8.50 8.50 9.00 0.50
Risk Management 6.25 6.10 7.45 1.35
Special Revenue: 1/4 Sales Tax from County 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
INTERNAL SERVICE AND OTHER
FUND TOTAL 133.75 131.60 148.45 16.85
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 19.00 32.00 32.00 0.00
TOTAL POSITIONS 3224.55 3279.55 3362.25 82.70
STAFFING DOCUMENT SUMMARY
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS 2019-20 THROUGH 2021-22
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
City Council
Council Person xxx 7.00 7.00 7.00
Executive Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director-City Council 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Advisor City Council 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Deputy Director -Council 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Public Policy Analyst 33 2.00 2.00 2.00
Operations Mgr/Mentor 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Community Facilitator
Community Facilitator 31 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Operations Mgr/Mentor
Public Policy Analyst II 31 3.00 3.00 3.00
Council Office Communication Director 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Policy Analyst 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Policy Analyst/Public Engagement 28 3.00 2.00 2.00
Public Engage/Comm Specialist II 28 0.00 1.00 1.00
Constituent Liaison/Public Policy Analyst 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Public Engagement & Comm Special 26 0.00 2.00 2.00
Constituent Liaison 26 3.00 2.00 2.00
Assistant to Council Executive Director 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Council Admin Asst 24 5.00 5.00 5.00
RPT Council Staff Asst 26 2.00 1.00 1.00
CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 35.00 35.00 35.00
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
City Administration
Mayor xxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chief of Staff 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chief Administrative Officer 41 0.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief of Staff 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Advisor 39 4.00 3.00 2.00 One Reclassification to Chief Equity Officer
Communications Director 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Deputy Director 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Policy Advisor 29 1.00 2.00 2.00
REP Commision Senior Staff Position 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Associate Director of Community Empowerment 28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Liaison 26 3.00 5.00 5.00
Executive Assistant 24 4.00 5.00 4.00 One Reclassification to Equity Team Member
Office Manager Mayor's Office 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Outreach Sp & E Coord 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Census Coordinator (23)
Census Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Community Outreach Sp &E Coord(24)
Communication & Content Mgr 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 19 2.00 2.00 2.00
Front Office Clerk 19 1.00 0.00 0.00
City Administration Total 24.00 26.00 25.00
Office of Equity and Inclusion
Chief Equity Officer 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 Formerly Senior Advisor
Equity Team Member 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Community & Neighborhood Dept. formerly
ADA & Equity Coordinator (26)
Equity Team Member 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Community & Neighborhood Dept. formerly
ADA & Equity Coordinator
Equity Team Member 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Finance Dept. formerly Consumer
Protection Analyst (16)
Equity Team Member 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Formerly Executive Assistant (24)
Office of Equity and Inclusion Total 0.00 0.00 5.00
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TOTAL 24.00 26.00 30.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU
911 Dispatch Director 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
911 Dispatch Deputy Director 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
911 Dispatch Operations Mgr 26 2.00 2.00 2.00
911 Dispatch Supervisor 24 10.00 10.00 10.00
911 Dispatch Dispatcher I-III 14-18 82.00 82.00 90.00 8 New Positions
911 Dispatch Dispatcher I-III Unfunded 14-18 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU TOTAL 100.00 100.00 108.00
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
Office of the Executive Director
Executive Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
ORAT Director 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant -Appointed 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Construction Coordinator 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Secretary 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Technician II 15 0.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Director's Office Total 5.00 6.00 6.00
Public Relations Division
Director Airport Public Relations & Marketing 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Air Service Development Manager 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Senior Manager Air Services Development
Senior Manager Air Services Development 31 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Air Service Development Manager
Airport Communication Manager 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Community Outreach Manager
Airport Community Outreach Manager 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Communication Manager
Airport Communication Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Public Relations Manager
Airport Public Relations Manager 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Communication Coordinator
Public Relations Total 4.00 4.00 4.00
Planning and Environmental Division
Director of Airport Plan/Cap Program 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Environmental Program Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Senior Planner 30 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 changed from Airport Principal Planner
Airport Principal Planner 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Senior Planner
Airport Senior Environmental Sustainability
Coordinator
31 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Environmental Sustainability
Coordinator
Airport Environmental Sustainability Coord 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Senior Airport Environmental Sustainability
Coordinator
Airport Planning Programs Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Associate Planner
Associate Planner 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Planning Programs Coordinator
Environmental Specialist II 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Environmental Specialist I
Environmental Specialist I 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Environmental Specialist II
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Planning & Environmental Total 9.00 9.00 9.00
Finance and Accounting Division
Director of Finance and Accounting 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Controller 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Finance Manager 37 2.00 1.00 1.00
Construction Finance Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst III 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Auditor III 28 1.00 1.00 1.00
Auditor II 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Accountant I
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Accountant III 27 5.00 5.00 5.00
Accountant II 21 3.00 3.00 3.00
Airport Procurement Specialist 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Accountant I 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Auditor II
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 2.00 0.00 0.00
Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport 14 2.00 0.00 0.00
Part-Time/Accounting Intern 0.50 0.50 0.50
Finance and Accounting Total 22.50 16.50 16.50
Maintenance Division
Director of Maintenance 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Maintenance Director 36 0.00 0.00 4.00 3 changed from Airport Maintenance Superintendent, 1
changed from Technical Systems Program Mgr
Airport Maintenance Operations Superintendent 34 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Assistant Maintenance Director
Airport Fleet Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Superintendent 32 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Assistant Maintenance Director
Aviation Services Manager 31 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 changed from Facilities Maintenance Contract Coordinator
Airport Maintenance Ops Support Mgr 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Facilities Assets Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Manager 31 3.00 3.00 3.00
Facilities Maint Warranty/Commission Mgr 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Technical Systems Program Mgr 29 2.00 3.00 2.00 1 changed to Assistant Maintenance Director
Tech Systems Analyst IV 28 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Maintenance Electrician I (Apprentice)
Computer Maint Mgmt Systems Administrator 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Computer Maint Systems Supervisor
Computer Maint Systems Supervisor 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Computer Maint Mgmt Systems Administrator
Airport Fleet/Warehouse Operations Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Contract Administrator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Facility Maint Supervisor 27 2.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Airport Grounds/Pavement Supervisor 27 4.00 4.00 4.00
Plant Coordinator Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Maintenance Supervisor
Aviation Srvs Tech Sys Adm 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Civil Maint Warranty 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Manager 26 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Facility Maintenance Coordinator
HVAC Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Management Services Supervisor 25 4.00 4.00 4.00
Facility Maint Supervisor 25 21.00 21.00 13.00 8 changed to Airport Maintenance Supervisor
Airport Signs Graphic Design Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Coordinator 25 21.00 21.00 25.00 2 changed from Facility Maintenance Manager, 2 from
Facilities Contract Compliance Specialist
Airport Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 1.00 10.00 8 FTE's changed from Facility Maint Supervisor, 1 from Plant
Coordinator Supervisor
Electronic Security Technician 24 14.00 14.00 12.00 2 changed to Airfield Maintenance Electrician
Management Analyst 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Supervisor 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Grounds/Pavement Super 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Contract Coordinator 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Aviation Services Manager
Facility Support Coordinator 26 0.00 0.00 4.00 2 changed from Painter II, 2 changed from General
Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 20.00 22.00 3.00 19 changed to Airfield Maintenance Electrician
Airfield Maintenance Electrician 25 0.00 0.00 21.00 19 changed from Maintenance Electrician IV, 2 changed
from Electronic Security Technician
Airfield Electrical Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 4.00 3 changed from Carpenter II, 1 moved from Operations -
Paging Operator
HVAC Tech II 21 8.00 8.00 8.00
Airport Lead Sign Technician 21 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Fleet Mechanic 21 4.00 6.00 5.00 1changed to Fleet Mechanic II
Plumber II 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Budget & Special Projects
Airport Procurement Specialist 21 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Senior Warehouse Operator
Airport Budget & Special Projects Coordinator 20 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Plumber II
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Airport Maintenance Mechanic II 20 6.00 0.00 0.00
Airfield Maint. Equip. Operator IV 20 23.00 23.00 23.00
Airport Lighting & Sign Technician 20 3.00 5.00 5.00
Carpenter II 20 7.00 9.00 6.00 3 changed to Airfield Electrical Supervisor
General Maintenance Worker 20 2.00 8.00 6.00 2 changed to Facility Support Coordinator
Fleet Body Repair and Painter 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mechanic I/II 20 19.00 19.00 20.00 1 changed Senior Fleet Mechanic
Painter II 20 5.00 7.00 5.00 2 changed to Facility Support Coordinator
Office Facilitator I/II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facilities Contract Compliance Specialist 19 0.00 8.00 6.00 2 changed to Facility Maintenance Coordinator
Facility Maint. Contract Repair Senior Repair
Technician
19 2.00 0.00 0.00
Facility Maint Contract Repair Tech II 19 3.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Florist 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airfield Maint. Equipment Oper III 18 61.00 66.00 66.00
Maintenance Electrician I (Apprentice)17 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Tech Systems Analyst IV
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 2.00 4.00 1 changed from Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport & 1 changed
from Airpor Procurement Specialist
Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport 14 0.00 2.00 1.00 1 changed to Senior Warehouse Operator
Fleet Services Worker 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Intern 0.50 0.50 0.50
Maintenance Division Total 266.50 293.50 294.50
Engineering Division
Director - Airport Engineering 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer VII 36 2.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Architect 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Engineer Project Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Senior Architectural Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer VI 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Architect 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Geographic Information System Mgr 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer V 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Construction Program Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Construction Manager 27 3.00 3.00 3.00
Engineering Tech VI 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
GIS Programmer Analyst 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Engineering Tech V 24 3.00 3.00 3.00
Architectural Associate IV 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech IV 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Construction Project Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Coordinator III 22 2.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Field Technician 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Records Program Specialist 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Division Total 31.00 31.00 31.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Operations Division
Chief Operating Officer 39 0.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Airport Operations 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Operations Director 38 0.00 0.00 3.00 3 changed from Airport Operations - Superintendent
Airport Operations Superintendent - Security
Comm
35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Assistant Operations Director
Airport Operations Superintendent - Landside 35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Assistant Operations Director
Airport Operations Superintendent - Terminals 35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Assistant Operations Director
Airport Operations Manager - Ground
Transportation
31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager / Parking 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager - Airfield 29 16.00 16.00 14.00 1 changed to Airport Operations Manager - Terminals, 1
changed to Airport Operations Manager - Customer Service
Airport Operations Manager Airfield/FBO 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager - Terminals 29 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Airport Operations Manager - Airfield
Airport Operations Manager -Safety 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager - Security 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager / Communications 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager - Customer Service 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Operations Manager - Airfield
Airport Customer Service Supervisor 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Operations Supervisor - Airfield
Airport Training Coordinator 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
Safety Program Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 3.00 1 changed from Airport Landside Operations Supervisor, 1
changed fromo Airport Operations Specialist - Airfield
Airport Operations Supervisor - Airfield 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Customer Service Supervisor
Airport Landside Operations Supervisor 25 13.00 13.00 12.00 Changed to Safety Program Coordinator
Airport Operations Duty Agent Supervisor 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Supervisor / Access Control 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Access Control Coordinator 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Landside Operations Officer
Management Analyst 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Senior Secretary
Airport Operations Supervisor / Communications 24 5.00 5.00 5.00
Airport Operations Training Supervisor
Communications
24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engagement Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Specialists - Airfield 23 22.00 22.00 21.00 Changed to Safety Program Coordinator
Airport Operations Specialists - Terminal 23 25.00 25.00 25.00
Airport Operations Customer Service
Representative
23 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Senior Secretary
Airport Operations Agent - FBO 23 6.00 6.00 6.00
Airport Operations Duty Agent 23 0.00 14.00 14.00
Employment Services Coordinator 21 1.00 2.00 1.00 Changed to Airport Operations Coordinator
Airport Commercial Vehicle Ins 18 3.00 3.00 3.00
Airport Landside Operations Officer 18 37.00 37.00 36.00 Changed to Airport Operations Access Control Coord
Air Operations Security Spec 17 2.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Operations Lead Coordinator 17 4.00 4.00 4.00
Airport Operations Coordinator 16 0.00 0.00 14.00 8 changed from Airport Operations Coord II, 5 changed from
Airport Operations Coord I, 1 changed from Employment
Services Coordinator
Airport Operations Coord II 16 8.00 8.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Operations Coordinator
Senior Secretary 15 3.00 3.00 0.00 Changed to Office Facilitator II, Airport Operations Customer
Service Rep, Part-Time Operations Intern
Access Control Specialist 15 5.00 7.00 7.00
Office Technician II 15 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Coord I 14 5.00 5.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Operations Coordinator
Paging Operator 10 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Maintenance - Airfield Electrical Sup
Part-Time Operations Technician 1.50 1.50 2.50 Changed from Senior Secretary
Part-Time Operations Intern 1.00 1.00 1.00
Regular Part-Time/Paging Operator 10 0.30 0.30 0.30
Operations Division Total 176.80 197.80 196.80
Commercial Services Division
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Director Administration and Commercial Services 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Commercial Manager Airport 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Contracts & Procurement Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Property & Real Estate Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Development Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Tenant Relations Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Property Specialist II 27 1.00 1.00 3.00 1 changed from Airport Property Specialist I, 1 changed from
Contracts Specialist II
Airport Contract Specialist I 27 1.00 2.00 2.00
Commercial Program Specialist 27 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Contracts Specialist II 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 Channged to Airport Property Specialist II
Airport Risk Manager 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Risk Management Coordinator
Airport Risk Management Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Risk Manager
Airport Property Specialist I 24 2.00 2.00 1.00 Channged to Airport Property Specialist II
Admin Assistant / GRAMA Coord 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Secretary II 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Administrative Secretary
Administrative Secretary 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Administrative Secretary II
Commercial Services Division Total 14.00 16.00 16.00
Information Technology Services Division
Airport Information Management Services Director 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Information Technology Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Special Systems Manager 36 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Airport Tech Systems Superintendent
Airport Tech Systems Superintendent 36 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Airport Special Systems Manager
Software Engineer III 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Engineering Team Manager 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Network System Engineer II
Network System Engineer III 33 1.00 1.00 3.00 2 changed from Network System Engineer II
Network System Engineer II 31 4.00 4.00 1.00 2 changed to Network System Engineer III, 1 FTE changed
to Network Engineering Team Manager
Software Support Admin II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Technical System Program Manager 29 3.00 3.00 3.00
Network Support Team Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Support Administrator III 27 8.00 8.00 7.00 Changed to Network Support Administrator II
Technical Systems Analyst IV 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Technical Systems Analyst III 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Technical Systems Analyst II
Network Support Administrator II 25 8.00 9.00 10.00 Changed from Network Support Administrator III
Technical Systems Analyst II 24 1.00 2.00 3.00 Changed from Technical Systems Analyst III
Network Support Administrator I 23 2.00 2.00 2.00
Information Technology Services Division
Total
35.00 37.00 37.00
SLC DEPT OF AIRPORTS TOTAL 563.80 610.80 610.80
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Office of City Attorney
City Attorney 42 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office of City Attorney Total 2.00 2.00 2.00
Legal Support
General Fund
Deputy City Attorney 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Division Chief Senior City Attorney 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 changed from Senior City Attorney
Senior City Attorney 39 9.50 9.50 8.50 1 New Position BA#5, 2 changed to Division Chief Senior City
Attorney
Assistant City Attorney 34 0.50 0.50 0.50
First Assistant City Prosecutor 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Assistant City Prosecutor 29 3.00 3.00 3.00 1 changed from Assosiate City Prosecutor
Associate City Prosecutor 27 9.00 9.00 10.00 1 New Postition; 1 changed to Assistant City Prosecutor
Paralegal 21 4.50 4.50 4.50
Prosecutor Law Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Legal Secretary III 18 1.00 1.00 3.00 New Position BA#5, 1 changed from Government Immunity
Senior Prosecutor Assistant 17 3.00 3.00 6.00 3 changed from Prosecutor Assistant
Prosecutor Assistant 16 7.00 7.00 4.00 3 changed to Senior Prosecutor Assistant
Legal Support Total 41.50 41.50 45.50
City Recorder
City Recorder 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst City Recorder Operations 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 changed to Minutes and Records Clerk
Asst City Recorder Records Spec 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 changed to Minutes and Records Clerk
Minutes and Records Clerk 19 0.00 0.00 2.00 1 changed from Asst City Recorder Operations; 1 changed
from Asst City Recorder Records Spec.
Deputy Recorder 26 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 New Position BA#5, changed from grade 19 to 26
Senior Records Technician 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 changedto Associate Records Technician
Associate Records Technician 18 1.00 1 changed from Senior Records Technician
RPT/Records Clerk 0 0.75 0.75 0.75
City Recorder Total 6.75 6.75 7.75
Risk Management Fund
Risk Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Risk Management Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I 18 0.00 0.00 0.50 New Position
Subtotal of Risk Mgmt Fund 2.00 2.00 2.50
Governmental Immunity Fund
Division Chief Senior City Attorney 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Senior City Attorney
Senior City Attorney 39 3.50 3.50 3.50 1 New Position BA#5, 1 changed to Division Chief
Assistant City Attorney 34 0.50 0.50 0.50
Claims Adjuster 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Legal Secretary III 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 moved to general fund
Claims Specialist 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Paralegal 21 2.50 2.50 2.50
Office Facilitator I 18 0.00 0.00 0.50 New Position
Subtotal of Gov Imm Fund 8.50 8.50 9.00
CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 60.75 60.75 66.75
General Fund 50.25 50.25 55.25
Risk Management Fund 2.00 2.00 2.50
Governmental Immunity Fund 8.50 8.50 9.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS
CAN Admin Office of the Director
CAN Admin Office of the Director
CAN Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
CAN Deputy Director 37 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Position
CAN Financial & Administrative Services Dir 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
CARES Policy and Program Manager 32 1.00 2.00 1.00 1 Transferred to Engineering
Civic Engagment Mngr, Spec, Asst 21-31 0.00 4.00 0.00 4 Transferred to IMS Innovations Team
Civic Engagement Innovations Manager 32 1.00 0.00 0.00
CARES Real Property Mngr, Agent, Spec 21-31 1.00 4.00 4.00
CIP Manager, Specialist 25-31 0.00 2.00 2.00
CARES Capital Asset Division Manager 31 1.00 0.00 0.00
Civic Engagement Manager 31 1.00 0.00 0.00
CARES Real Property Agent 26 2.00 0.00 0.00
ADA & Equity Program Coordinators 26 0.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to the Mayor's Office
ADA Community Liaison 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Cares Capital Improv Program Specialist 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Civic Engagement Program Spec 24 2.00 0.00 0.00
Small Business Loan Officer 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Assistant 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
CARES Office Facilitator 18-19 1.00 0.00 0.00
CAN Admin Office of Director Total 18.00 18.00 12.00
Building Services
Building Official 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Building Serv & Licensing Manager 32 3.00 3.00 3.00
Development Review Spvr, Sr, Planner I-III 25-30 0.00 8.00 1.00 7 Transferred to Planning
Development Review Supervisor 30 2.00 0.00 0.00
Economic Dev Business Coord 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Plans Examiner Sr, Chief, I-III 25-29 0.00 10.00 10.00
Building Inspector Sr, I-III 19-29 0.00 22.00 22.00
Civil Enforcement Spvr, Insp, Officer I-III 17-29 0.00 9.00 9.00
Housing/Zoning Specialist 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Building Inspector 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Chief Plans Examiner 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Plans Examiner 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Housing/Zoning Inspector 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Sr. Development Review Planner 27 2.00 0.00 0.00
Housing/Zoning Legal Investigator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Building Inspector I-III 19-27 21.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Protection Engineer 29 2.00 1.00 1.00
Development Review Planner I- II 25 4.00 0.00 0.00
Plans Examiner I-II 25 6.00 0.00 0.00
Review Processor Supervisor 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 2.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Enforcement Officer I- II 17-19 8.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Permit Processor I-II 14-16 4.00 5.00 5.00
Office Facilitator I-III, Sr Secretary 15-19 0.00 5.00 5.00
Senior Secretary 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Technician II 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Building Services Total 66.00 66.00 59.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Engineering
City Engineer 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to PS
Deputy City Engineer 36 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to PS
Engineer II-VII 27-36 13.00 12.00 0.00 12 Transferred to PS
Architect City, Sr, Mngr, III 29-36 0.00 4.00 0.00 4 Transferred to PS
GIS Mngr, Coord, Anaylst, Spec 24-33 0.00 7.00 0.00 2 Transferred to IMS, 5 Transferred to PS
Survey City, Prof Land 26-30 0.00 3.00 0.00 3 Transferred to PS
City Architect 36 1.00 0.00 0.00
GIS Manager 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Architect 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 0.00 0.00
GIS Systems Coordinator 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
City Surveyor 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Landscape Architect III 29 2.00 0.00 0.00
Financial Analyst III 29 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to Y&F
Engineering Const Program Project Manager 29 3.00 3.00 0.00 3 Transferred to PS
Pub Way Concrete/Pave Manager 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Technician IV-VI 23-27 8.00 9.00 0.00 9 Transferred to PS
GIS Programmer Analyst 27 2.00 0.00 0.00
Professional Land Surveyor/GIS Specialist 26 2.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Support Services Manager 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to PS
GIS Specialist 24 2.00 0.00 0.00
Civic Engagement Program Spec 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to PS
GIS Tech II 23 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to PS
Eng Info and Records Spec 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to PS
Engineering Total 46.00 46.00 0.00
Housing & Neighborhood Development
Director, HAND 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director HAND 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
HAND Policy and Prog Manager, Spec 26-32 0.00 5.00 5.00
Housing Program Manager 29 2.00 0.00 0.00
Homeless Manager, Coord 26-29 0.00 2.00 2.00
Homeless Manager 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
HAND Project Policy 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Accountant III 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Planner 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Manager Housing 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Homeless Strategies & Outreach 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Dev Programs Specialist 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Dev Grant Admin 26 2.00 3.00 3.00
CD Programs & Grant Specialist 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Rehab Spec, Officer I-II 22-25 0.00 5.00 5.00
Housing Rehab Specialist 25 2.00 0.00 0.00
Housing & Rehab Loan Officer 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Rehab Specialist I-II 22-23 2.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Loan Administrator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New Position
Housing & Neighborhood Dev Total 21.00 21.00 22.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Planning
Planning Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Planning Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Planning Manager 33 3.00 3.00 4.00 New Position
Planning Programs Supervisor 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Development Review Spvr, Sr, Planner I-III 25-30 0.00 0.00 7.00 7 Transferred from Building Services
Planner Senior, Pricincipal, Assoc 24-28 0.00 21.00 21.00
Senior Planner 28 8.00 0.00 3.00 3 New Positions
Urban Designer 28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Principal Planner 27 10.00 0.00 0.00
Associate Planner 24 2.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Secretary 18 2.00 2.00 2.00
Graphic Design Tech 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Planning Total 30.00 30.00 41.00
Transportation
Director of Transportation Planning 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director of Transportation 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer II-VII 36 6.00 7.00 7.00
Transportation Program Manager 33 3.00 2.00 2.00
Transit Program Planner I-III 25.28 6.00 7.00 7.00
Traffic Control Center Super, Oper I-II 23-26 0.00 2.00 2.00
Traffic Control Center Super 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Special Projects Analyst 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Traffic Tech I-II 23 4.00 4.00 4.00
Traffic Control Center Oper I-II 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Traffic Control Center I 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II, Tech 15-19 1.00 2.00 2.00
Office Technician I 12 1.00 0.00 0.00
Transportation Total 26.00 26.00 26.00
Youth & Family Division
Youth & Family Div Director 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from PS
Associate Director Youth City 29 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 Transferred from PS
Financial Analyst III 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Engineering
Senior Community Programs Manager 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from PS
Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 7.00 7 Transferred from PS
Events Coordinator Sorenson 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from PS
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from PS
Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from PS
Program Assistant 14 0.00 0.00 4.00 4 Transferred from PS
Youth City Coordinator 10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Youth & Family Total 0.00 0.00 19.00
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOOD TOTAL 207.00 207.00 179.00
General Fund 204.00 204.00 176.00
1/4 Cent Sales Tax Transportation Fund 3.00 3.00 3.00
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Economic Development
Economic Development Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Deputy Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Technology & Innovation Strategic Ind Advisor 34 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from 29 to 34
Director of Business Development 32 0.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from from 29 to 32.
Economic Development Manager 29 5.00 4.00 4.00
ED Project Coordinator 25 2.00 3.00 3.00
Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Total 10.00 12.00 12.00
Arts Council
Arts Council Executive Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arts Council Assistant Director 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from 27 to 29
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Arts Council Program Coordinator 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Public Art Program Manager 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arts Council Total 6.00 6.00 6.00
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 16.00 18.00 18.00
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Redevelopment Agency
Chief Operating Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief Operating Officer 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Project Manager 33 2.00 2.00 2.00
Financial Analyst III 29 0.00 0.00 1.00
Project Manager 29 7.00 7.00 7.00
Communications Manager 29 0.00 0.00 1.00
Communications Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 0.00
Property Administrator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant II 21 1.00 1.00 0.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II Non-Union 19 0.00 0.00 2.00
Office Facilitator I 18 2.00 2.00 0.00
Redevelopment Agency Total 19.00 19.00 19.00
Gallivan Plaza
Custodian II 11 0.00 1.00 1.00
Office Technician I 12 0.00 1.00 1.00
General Maintenance Worker II 16 0.00 5.00 5.00
Office Facilitator II Non-Union 19 0.00 1.00 1.00
Plaza Marketing/Activities Supr 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Gallivan Event Adv/Mktg Manager 25 0.00 2.00 2.00
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 1.00 0.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 0.00 1.00
Plaza & Comm Events Div Director 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
Redevelopment Agency Total 0.00 13.00 13.00
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL 19.00 32.00 32.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Office of the Fire Chief
Fire Chief 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Chief 35 2.00 2.00 2.00
Administrative Secretary II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial & Admin Svs Manager 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I-III 18-27 0.00 2.00 3.00 1 New Position
Office of the Fire Chief Total 5.00 8.00 9.00
Community Relations
Battalion Chief 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Captain 30 2.00 0.00 0.00
Recruiting/Outreach Specialist 20 1.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Public Education Specialist 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Relations Total 6.00 0.00 0.00
Finance
Financial & Admin Svs Manager 32 1.00 0.00 0.00
Accountant I-III 18-27 2.00 0.00 0.00
Finance Total 3.00 0.00 0.00
Logistics
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Battalion Chief 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Captain 30 2.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Fighter 22-28 3.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Logistics Coordinator 19 1.00 0.00 0.00
Support Services Total 7.00 0.00 0.00
Communications Division
Director Emergency Communications 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Public Safety Technology Systems Coordinator 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Communication Tech 20 1.00 0.00 0.00
Communications Division Total 3.00 0.00 0.00
Training
Battalion Chief 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Captain 30 3.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Fighter 22-28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Logistics Coordinator 19 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 0.00 0.00
Training Total 7.00 0.00 0.00
Operations
Battalion Chief 33 6.00 6.00 6.00
Captain 30 52.00 65.00 65.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 197.00 222.00 222.00
Fire Fighter Unfunded 22-27 10.00 10.00 10.00
Operations Total 265.00 303.00 303.00
Airport Operations
Battalion Chief 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Captain 30 10.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 30.00 0.00 0.00
Operations Total 41.00 0.00 0.00
Emergency Medical
Battalion Chief 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Captain 30 2.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 8.00 0.00 0.00
Community Health Care Paramedic 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 0.00 0.00
Emergency Medical Total 13.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Prevention
Battalion Chief 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Captain 30 3.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 7.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Prevention Specialist 17 3.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 2.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Prevention Totals 16.00 0.00 0.00
Fire Administrative Services
Battalion Chief 33 0.00 6.00 7.00 1 Transferred from Police & Reclassified from Emergency
Management Program Director
Captain 30 0.00 12.00 14.00 2 New Positions
Recruiting/Outreach Specialist 20 0.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 0.00 21.00 21.00
Community Health Care Paramedic 24 0.00 2.00 2.00
Public Education Specialist 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Logistics Coordinator 19 0.00 2.00 2.00
Director Emergency Communications 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Public Safety Technology Systems Coordinator 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Communication Tech 20 0.00 1.00 1.00
Emergency Mgt Multi-Language Media
Coordinator
25 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Police
Emergency Mgt Training Program Specialist 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Police
Community Preparedness Coordinator 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Police
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Emergency Mgt Critical Infrastructure Liaison 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Police
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 3.00 3.00
Fire Prevention Specialist 17 0.00 3.00 3.00
Office Technician I 12 0.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Administrative Services Total 0.00 55.00 62.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 366.00 366.00 374.00
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Accounting Total
Chief Financial Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Business Sys Analyst Team Lead 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Controller 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Sys Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Systems Admin 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Payroll & Accounting Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
City Payroll Administrator 26 2.00 2.00 2.00
Grants Acq/Project Coordinator 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sr Payroll Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Payroll Kronos Specialist 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
City A/P Coordinator 20 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accounting Total 14.00 14.00 16.00
Financial Reporting/Budget
Deputy Controller 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 2.00 2.00
Financial Analyst IV (RDA)32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant IV 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Staffing/Position Control Specialist 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Property Control Agent 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Reporting/Budget 6.00 6.00 6.00
Internal Audit & Financial Analysis
Director Int Audit & Fin Analysis 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Financial Analyst Auditor 32 4.00 4.00 4.00
Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Internal Audit & Financial Analysis Total 6.00 6.00 6.00
Revenue & Collections
Director Revenue & Collections 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Collections Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Licensing Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst III 29 2.00 1.00 1.00
Landlord/Tenant License Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Collections Officer 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Collections Officer 20 4.00 4.00 4.00
Consumer Protection Analyst 0.00 0.00 0.00 New Position BA#5, transferred to Mayors Office
Business License Officer 17 2.00 3.00 3.00
Business License Processor II 16 4.00 3.00 3.00
Business License Processor I 14 1.00 1.00 1.00
Revenue & Collections Total 19.00 19.00 19.00
Civil Action Unit
Lead Hearing Officer Referee Coord.19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hearing Officer Referee Coord II 18 2.00 2.00 2.00
Hearing Officer Referee Coord I 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Civil Action Unit 3.00 3.00 3.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Purchasing
Chief Procurement Officer 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Contracts Administrator 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Purchasing Consultant 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Procurement Specialist II 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Procurement Specialist I 24 1.00 2.00 2.00
Contract Development Specialist 23 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Contracts Process Coordinator 17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Purchasing Total 10.00 10.00 10.00
Treasurer's Office
City Treasurer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Treasurer 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cash & Investment Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 2.00 2.00 2.00
Cashier Administrator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Payment Processor 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Treasurer's Office Total 9.00 9.00 9.00
Policy & Budget
City Budget Director 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Budget & Policy Analyst 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Policy & Budget Analyst 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Budget and Policy Total 3.00 3.00 3.00
General Fund 69.70 69.70 71.70
Risk Fund 0.30 0.30 0.30
FINANCE 70.00 70.00 72.00
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Human Resource Administrative Support
Chief Human Resource Officer 41 0.00 0.80 0.80
Human Resource Mgmt Director 41 0.80 0.00 0.00
Deputy Chief Human Resource Officer 37 0.00 0.00 0.85 Changed from Human Res Deputy Director
Human Resource Deputy Director 37 0.85 0.00 0.00 New position BA#5, changed to Deputy Chief Human
Resource Officer BA#7
Civilian Review Board Investigator 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recruiting & Onboarding Mgr 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.80 0.80 0.80
Human Resources Supervisor - Recruitment 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Compensation and Classification Anaylst 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Leave Specialist 29 0.00 0.80 0.80
Senior HR Recruiter 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resource Leave Coordinator 27 0.80 0.00 0.00
Employee Marketing & Communications 25 0.80 0.80 0.00 Changed to Human Resource Business Partner II (29)
HR Office Administrator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Benefits Analyst 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Benefits Analyst (25)
Benefits Analyst 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Senior Benefits Analyst (27)
HR Recruiter 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
HR Admin & Onboarding Specialist 21 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Sr HR Tech (19), Assoc HR Recruiter (21)
Associate HR Recruiter 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from HR Admin & Onboarding Specialist (21)
Senior HR Technician 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from HR Admin & Onboarding Specialist (21)
Senior HR Technician 19 0.00 0.00 2.00 New positions
Administrative Support Total 11.05 13.20 17.25
Departmental Consultants
Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 0.00 0.00 0.00
Employee Relations/EEO Manager 34 0.00 1.00 1.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Labor & Employee Relations 34 1.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Program Specialist 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Business Partner II 29 0.00 5.00 5.80 Changed from Employee Marketing & Comm (25)
Senior Human Resource Consultant 29 6.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Consultant 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Associate 22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Departmental Consultants Total 9.00 6.00 6.80
Training
Education Program Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Learning and Development Specialist 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Training & Development Coord (24)
Training & Development Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Learning and Development Specialist (27)
Human Resource Management Total 2.00 2.00 2.00
Benefits
Chief Human Resource Officer 41 0.00 0.20 0.20
Human Resource Mgmt Director 41 0.20 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Deputy Director 37 0.15 0.00 0.15
Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.20 0.20 0.20
Human Resources Supervisor - Benefits 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Human Resource Leave Specialist 29 0.00 0.20 0.20
Human Resource Leave Coordinator 27 0.20 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Business Partner II 29 0.00 0.00 0.20 Changed from Employee Marketing & Comm (25)
Employee Marketing & Communications 25 0.20 0.20 0.00 Changed to Human Resource Business Partner II (29)
Senior Benefits Analyst 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Benefits Analyst (25)
Benefits Analyst 25 2.00 2.00 1.00 Changed to Senior Benefits Analyst (27)
Benefits Total 3.95 3.80 4.95
Human Resources Total 26.00 25.00 31.00
General Fund 22.05 21.20 26.05
Risk Fund 3.95 3.80 4.95
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Department Leadership and Administration
Chief Information Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst II-III 24-29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Solution Manager 34 4.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Department Leadership and Administration
Totals
7.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Services
Financial Manager I 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst II-III 24-29 0.00 0.00 2.00 The titles of these individuals have been renamed. This does
not affect the pay of these employees.
Asset Management Administrator 26 0.00 1.00 0.00
Inventory Control Specialist 24 0.00 1.00 0.00
Purchasing and Administration Totals 0.00 3.00 3.00
Infrastructure Technology Services (ITS)
Chief Information Security Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Engineering Team Manager 34 0.00 1.00 2.00 New Position - ERP Manager
Network Security Manager 34 3.00 0.00 0.00
Network Systems Engineer I-III 27-33 7.00 9.00 12.00 New Position - Cyber security, Unified communications, and
Enterprise Backup and Wireless.
INF Technology Support Manager 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
End User Team Manager 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Dept Info tech Operation Team Lead 31 1.00 0.00 0.00
Network Support Administrator I - III 23-27 12.00 12.00 12.00
Asset Management Administrator 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Inventory Control Specialist 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Infrastructure Technology Services Totals 27.00 24.00 28.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Geographical Information Systems
Chief Data Officer 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 These employees have been transferred from CAN and other
Parts of IMS to create this team. These are not new positions
within the city and were moved from CAN. However, they are
now housed with IMS.
GIS Programmer Analyst 30 0.00 0.00 2.00 Moved in budget Amedment #8
Geo Info Systems (GIS) Coord 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved in budget Amedment #8
Geographical Information Systems Totals 0.00 0.00 4.00
Software Services
Chief Technology Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Software Services 37 0.00 0.00 0.00
Software Engineer Team Lead 36 0.00 1.00 1.00
Enterprise Application Architect 37 1.00 0.00 0.00
Geo Info Systems (GIS) Coord 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 This position was moved to the GIS Team
Software Lead 34 0.00 4.00 2.00 1 moved to Tech Solution Manager and 1 moved to Software
Support Admin.
Sr Software Engineer 35 2.00 1.00 1.00
Software Engineering Data Admin 36 3.00 4.00 3.00 This position was moved to the GIS Team
Software Engineer I-III 27-33 6.00 5.00 5.00
Software Engineer Team Manager 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Software Support Team Manager 34 3.00 0.00 0.00
Software Support Admin I-III 28-32 14.00 14.00 15.00 Moved from Software Lead
Tech Solution Manager 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Software Lead
Software Support Totals 32.00 32.00 30.00
Media and Engagement Services We have rebranded this team to be more encompasing of
the work that they perform.
Video Production Manager 3 1.00 1.00 1.00
Multimedia Production Spec I-III 23-31 4.00 4.00 4.00
Civic Engagement Program Specialist 24 0.00 0.00 5.00 1 New Position. The remaining 4 were transferred from
another department.
Multimedia Production Services Totals 5.00 5.00 10.00
Enterprise Project Management We have rebranded this team to be more encompasing of
the work that they perform.
Technology Solution Team Lead 36 0.00 1.00 1.00
INF Tech Project Manager 35 0.00 1.00 1.00
Software Lead 34 0.00 2.00 2.00
Solution Management Totals 0.00 4.00 4.00
Innovations Team
Chief Innovations Officer 36 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position BA#6
Innovations Team Lead 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position BA#6
Senior Innovations Consultant 30 0.00 0.00 2.00 New Position BA#6
Solution Management Totals 0.00 0.00 4.00
INFORMATION MGMT SVCS TOTALS 71.00 69.00 84.00
JUSTICE COURT
Justice Court
Criminal Court Judge 37 5.00 5.00 5.00
City Courts Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Justice Court Section Manager 26 2.00 2.00 2.00
Justice Court Supervisor 24 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accountant II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Justice Court Case Managers 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Justice Court Lead Judicial Assistant 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Payment Processor 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant III 17 11.00 0.00 0.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant II 16 7.00 0.00 0.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Justice Court Judicial Assistant I 15 9.00 0.00 0.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant I,II,III 15-17 0.00 25.00 25.00
Justice Court Total 44.00 42.00 42.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Office of the Police Chief
Chief of Police 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Chief 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Deputy Chief (32) / Transferred to Investigative
Lieutenant--Police 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial & Admin Services Manager 32 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Administration
Sergeant Police 29 1.00 1.00 4.00 Transferred from Patrol and Administration
Police Public Relations Director 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Communications Administrative Director (37)
Communications Administrative Director 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Police Public Relations Director (29)
Police Officer 19-25 5.00 8.00 8.00
Mental Health Professional 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Accountant I-III 21-27 4.00 4.00 0.00 Transferred to Administration
Grant Acquis & Proj Fin Analyst 27 0.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Administration
Grants Acquisition/Project Coordinator 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Patrol Bureau
Administrative Assistant Appointed 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Executive Assistant
Executive Assistant 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Administrative Assistant
Administrative Secretary I-II 18-21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Services Coordinator 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Administration
Graphic Design Specialist 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Graphic Designer 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Tech I-II 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office of the Police Chief Total 21.00 24.00 21.00
Administration and Operational Support
Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Captain--Police 34 4.00 4.00 1.00 Transferred to Training and Investigations
Lieutenant--Police 32 5.00 5.00 1.00 Transferred to Investigative
Sergeant--Police 29 18.00 18.00 2.00 Transferred to Investigative
Financial & Admin Services Manager 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Office of the Chief
Accountant I-III 21-27 0.00 0.00 4.00 Transferred from Office of the Chief
Grant Acquis & Proj Fin Analyst 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Office of the Chief
Police Services Coordinator 20 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Office of the Chief
Records Director 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Lab/Evidence Room Manager Director 29 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Manager (29)
Police Officer I-III 19-25 118.00 147.00 7.00 Transferred to Investigative and Patrol
Public Safety Tech Systems Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Lab Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 0.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Police Intelligence Specialist 21 5.00 3.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Forensic Scientist Lab Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Quality Assurance Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Communications Tech 23 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to 24 from 23
Information Systems Supervisor 22 5.00 5.00 5.00
Forensic Scientist 21 5.00 5.00 5.00
Grama Coordinator/Paralegal 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mgt Services Supervisor Coordinator 18 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Supervisor
Sr Police Information Specialist 15 13.00 13.00 13.00
Technical Support Specialist 15 5.00 5.00 5.00
Office Facilitator 18-19 0.00 2.00 1.00 Transferred to Investigative
Office Tech I-II 12-15 3.00 1.00 1.00
Police Information Specialist 13 16.00 16.00 16.00
Crime Lab Technician I-II 16-19 15.00 15.00 15.00
Evidence Technician I-II 16 7.00 7.00 6.00 Changed to Evidence Supervisor
Evidence Supervisor 23 1.00 Changed from Evidence Technician (16)
Victim Advocate Program Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Victim Advocate 22 2.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Gang Outreach Coordinator 15 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Community Programs Manager (24) Transferred
to Investigative
Crime Stats & Analysis Director 27 0.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Crime Statistics & Analysis Supervisor 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Emergency Management
Emergency Mgt Program Director 31 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Fire Department
Emergency Management City Wide Training &
Exercise Coord
24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Fire Department
Community Preparedness Coord.23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Fire Department
Emergency Management Asst Crit Infrastructure
Liaison
18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Fire Department
Outreach Program Administrator 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Fire Department
Administration 239.00 268.00 96.00
Patrol Operations Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Captain Police 34 4.00 4.00 3.00 Changed to Deputy Chief (37) / Moved to Training
Lieutenant--Police 32 17.00 18.00 12.00 Transferred to Investigative
Sergeant--Police 29 44.00 49.00 30.00 Transferred to Investigative and Training
Police Officer 19-25 348.00 310.00 279.00 Transferred to Investigative
Authorization - Early Hire Police Officer 19-25 20.00 20.00 0.00 Transferred to Training
Social Work Director 30 0.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Social Work Manager 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Social Work Case Worker 19 5.00 5.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Community Programs Manager 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Office of the Chief
LCSW/Mental Health Counselor 24 4.00 4.00 0.00 Transferred to Investigative
Administrative Secretary I 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Training and Airport Bureau
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 0.00 2.00 1.00 Transferred to Investigative
Office Tech I-II 12-15 5.00 3.00 1.00 Transferred to Training and Airport Bureau
Patrol Operations 451.00 419.00 327.00
Investigative Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Office of the Chief
Captain Police 34 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from Administration
Lieutenant--Police 32 0.00 0.00 5.00 Transferred from Patrol
Sergeant--Police 29 0.00 0.00 18.00 Transferred from Patrol and Administration
Police Officer 19-25 0.00 0.00 111.00 Transferred from Patrol and Administration
Social Work Director 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Patrol
Social Work Manager 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Administration / Changed from LCSW (24)
Social Work Case Worker 19 0.00 0.00 8.00 Transferred from Patrol / New
LCSW/Mental Health Counselor 24 0.00 0.00 12.00 Transferred from Patrol / New
Victim Advocate Program Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Administration
Victim Advocate 22 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from Administration
Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Patrol / Changed from Gang Outreach
Coordinator (15)
Crime Stats & Analysis Director 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Administration
Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from Administration / New
Police Intelligence Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from Administration
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from Patrol and Administration
Investigative Bureau 0.00 0.00 173.00
Training and Airport Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Captain / Moved from Operations
Captain Police 34 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from Administration
Lieutenant--Police 32 0.00 0.00 5.00 Transferred from Patrol and Administration
Sergeant--Police 29 0.00 0.00 15.00 Transferred from Patrol
Police Officer 19-25 0.00 0.00 58.00 Transferred from Patrol and Administration
Authorization - Early Hire Police Officer 19-25 0.00 0.00 20.00 Transferred from Patrol
Administrative Secretary I 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Patrol
Office Tech I-II 12-15 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Patrol
Training and Airport Bureau 0.00 0.00 103.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 711.00 711.00 720.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Administrative Services
Public Services Department Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Admin Services Deputy Director 38 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 FTE moved to IMS
Operations Deputy Director 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications and Administration Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Business Systems Analyst Team Lead 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
CARES Policy & Program Manager 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 FTE from Community & Neighborhoods
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.35 0.35 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Safety Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Strategy & Special Project Manager 28 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 FTE moved to IMS
Communications Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 FTE moved from Compliance and changed from Parking
Enforcement Officer (18)
Executive Assistant 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant Appointed 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Financial Analyst II 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 changed from Public Outreach and Information Liaison
(21)
Financial Analyst I 21 2.00 2.00 2.00
Public Outreach and Information Liaison 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 changed to Management Analyst (24)
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office of Director Total 15.35 15.35 15.00
Gallivan & Events Division
Gallivan Utah Center Program
Plaza & Comm Events Div Dir 32 0.95 0.00 0.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Facility Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Advertising/Marketing Mgr 25 1.45 0.00 0.00
Plaza Marketing/Activities Super 23 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 0.95 0.00 0.00
General Maint Worker I,II 16 5.00 0.00 0.00
Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Tech I 12 1.00 0.00 0.00
Custodian II 11 1.00 0.00 0.00
Plaza & Comm Events Div Dir 32 0.05 0.00 0.00
Advertising/Marketing Mgr 25 0.55 0.00 0.00
Special Events Permit Manager 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Special Events Permit Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 0.05 0.00 0.00
Special Events Admin Asst 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Gallivan & Events Total 15.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Transferred Engineering from Department of Community
& Neighborhoods
City Engineer 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Deputy City Engineer 36 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineer VII 36 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from CAN
City Architect 36 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineer VI 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineer V 33 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from CAN
GIS Manager 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Senior Architect 33 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from CAN
Senior Landscape Architect 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineer IV 31 0.00 0.00 6.00 5 Transferred from CAN and 1 New
GIS Systems Coordinator 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Licensed Architect 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 New
City Surveyor 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Financial Analyst III 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineer III 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Landscape Architect III 29 0.00 0.00 3.00 1 Transferred from CAN and 2 New
Engineering Const Program Project Manager 29 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from CAN
Pub Way Concrete/Pave Manager 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineer II 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineering Technician VI 27 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from CAN
GIS Programmer Analyst 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Professional Land Surveyor 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineering GIS/Asset Management Specialist 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineering Procurement & Contracts Specialist 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineering Support Services Manager 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
GIS Specialist 24 0.00 0.00 3.00 Transferred from CAN
Civic Engagement Program Spec 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineering Tech V 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from CAN
Engineering Tech IV Union 23 0.00 0.00 4.00 Transferred from CAN
GIS Tech II 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 2.00 Transferred from CAN
Eng. Data/SID Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from CAN
Eng. Info and Records Spec 18 0.00 0.00 2.00 1 Transferred from CAN and 1 New
Engineering Total 0.00 0.00 48.00
Golf Division
Golf Program - Golf Fund
Golf Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Associate Director 33 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Golf Manager 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.65 0.65 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Golf Professional 30 5.00 5.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Golf Course Super 27 to 36 holes 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
9-hole Golf Professional 27 2.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Golf Course Super 18 holes 27 3.00 3.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Golf Superintendent 9 Hole 25 2.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Assistant Golf Club Professional 20 7.00 7.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Assistant Golf Course Super 20 10.00 12.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Public Lands
Golf Subtotal for Golf Fund 34.65 34.65 0.00
Golf Division Total 34.65 34.65 0.00
Youth & Family Division
General Fund
Youth & Family Div Director 35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Associate Director Youth City 29 2.00 2.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Senior Community Programs Manager 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Community Programs Manager 24 7.00 7.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Events Coordinator Sorenson 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Program Assistant 14 4.00 4.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Youth City Coordinator 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred to CAN
Youth & Family Total 18.00 18.00 0.00
Compliance Division
Compliance Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Compliance Div Field Supervisor 27 2.00 1.00 1.00
Compliance Swing-Shift Field Supervisor 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1.0 from (19) Office Facilitator
Parking Pay Station Tech 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Compliance Enforcement Officer 20 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1.0 to (21) Special Projects Assistant
Parking Enforcement Officer 18 18.00 18.00 17.00 1.0 FTE changed and moved to PS Admin Communications
Coordinator (25)
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed 1.0 from (13) from Crossing Guard Coordinator
Crossing Guard Coordinator 13 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1.0 to (15) Office Tech II
Office Tech I 12 2.00 2.00 2.00
Compliance Total 30.00 30.00 29.00
Facilities Services Division
Building Maintenance Program
Facilities Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 1.00 1.00
Facilities Commissioning Authority 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst I 28 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Program Manager 28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 1.00 1.00
Energy/Utilities Management Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
District Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Supervisor 25 3.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Plumber III 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead HVAC Technician 22 0.00 1.00 1.00
HVAC Technician II 21 3.00 2.00 2.00
Lead Bldg Maintenance Tech 21 5.00 5.00 0.00 Changed 5.0 to (21) Maintenance Specialist III
Maintenance Specialist III 21 0.00 0.00 5.00 Changed 5.0 from (21) Lead Bldg Maintenance Tech
Carpenter II 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Painter II 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1.0 from Sprinkler Irrigation Tech I (16)
Gen Maint Worker IV 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1.0 to General Maintenance Worker II
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Specialist II 19 0.00 0.00 10.00 Changed 10.0 from (18) Building Equipment Operator II
Building Equipment Operator II 18 10.00 10.00 0.00 Changed 10.0 to (19) Maintenance Specialist II
General Maintenance Worker III 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1.0 from General Maintenance Worker IV
Building Equipment Operator I 17 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1.0 to (17) Maintenance Specialist I
Maintenance Specialist I 17 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1.0 from (17) Building Equipment Operator I
Equipment Operator 17 2.00 2.00 2.00
General Maintenance Worker III 16 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to General Maintenance Worker I (16)
General Maintenance Worker I 16 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from General Maintenance Worker III (17)
Senior Facilities Landscaper 16 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech 16 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1.0 to Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III (20)
Office Technician II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Beautification Maintenance Worker II 13 3.00 3.00 3.00
Beautification Maintenance Worker I 12 2.00 2.00 2.00
Facilities Services Total 47.00 47.00 47.00
Fleet Management Division
Fleet Fund
Fleet Mgmt Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Operations Manager 28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Fleet Daily Operations Leader 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fleet Asset Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mgmt Service Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Fleet Warehouse Super 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Metal Fabrication Tech 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Customer Service Advisor Lead 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Senior Mechanic 21 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fleet Mechanic 20 23.00 24.00 25.00 1 Changed from Fleet Mechanic Trainee (16)
Fleet Customer Service Advisor 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mechanic Trainee 16 3.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to Fleet Mechanic (20)
Fleet Senior Warehouse Operator 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Parts Warehouse Support Worker 14 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fleet Maintenance Scheduler 12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fleet Parts Delivery Driver 11 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Management Total 45.00 45.00 45.00
Streets Division
Streets Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 3.00 3.00
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Program Mgr 28 3.00 0.00 0.00
Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Maintenance Supervisor (25)
Streets Construction & Maintenance Supervisor 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Streets Operations Maintenance Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Streets Response Team Field Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 Changed from (21) Response Team Leader
Maintenance Supervisor 25 5.00 5.00 4.00 1 Changed to Operations Supervisor (27)
Traffic Signal Lead 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Traffic Signal Tech II 23 2.00 3.00 3.00
Response Team Leader 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to (24) SRT Field Supervisor
Streets Maintenance Lead 21 6.00 6.00 6.00
Traffic Maintenance Lead 21 2.00 2.00 2.00
Traffic Signal Tech I 21 2.00 1.00 1.00
Concrete Finisher 20 10.00 10.00 10.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Senior Asphalt Equipment Oper 20 12.00 12.00 12.00
Lead Equipment Operator 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Streets Response Team Member II 19 1.00 0.00 1.00 New position
Asphalt Equipment Oper II 18 38.00 38.00 38.00
Concrete Saw & Grinder Oper 18 2.00 2.00 2.00
Streets Response Team Member I 18 1.00 2.00 2.00
Traffic Maintenance Operator II 18 8.00 7.00 7.00
Communication and GIS Coordinator 18 0.00 1.00 1.00
Equipment Operator 17 5.00 5.00 5.00
Traffic Maintenance Operator I 16 2.00 3.00 3.00
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Communications Coordinator 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Streets Total 109.00 109.00 110.00
PUBLIC LANDS
Public Lands Administration
Public Lands Deputy Director 38 1.00 1.00 0.00
Associate Director Public Lands 33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 0.00
Landscape Architect III 29 1.00 1.00 0.00
Comm/Events & Marketing Mgr 29 0.00 1.00 0.00
PPL Project Manager 28 1.00 1.00 0.00
Program Support Coordinator 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 0.00
Public Relations Coordinator 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Parks Usage Coordinator 21 1.00 1.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 1.00 1.00 0.00
Public Lands Administration Total 10.00 10.00 0.00
Parks Division
Parks Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 2.00 0.00
Regional Athletic Complex Manager 29 1.00 1.00 0.00
City Sexton 28 1.00 1.00 0.00
Maintenance Program Manager 28 2.00 0.00 0.00
Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 1.00 0.00
District Supervisor 25 7.00 8.00 0.00
Maintenance Supervisor 25 2.00 1.00 0.00
Advertising/Marketing Mgr 25 0.00 1.00 0.00
Special Events Permit Manager 25 0.00 1.00 0.00
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 1.00 1.00 0.00
Metal Fabrication Tech 22 1.00 1.00 0.00
Events Coordinator 21 1.00 1.00 0.00
Plumber II 21 3.00 3.00 0.00
Central Control Irrigation Specialist 20 2.00 2.00 0.00
Concrete Finisher 20 1.00 1.00 0.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 1.00 1.00 0.00
General Maintenance Worker IV 19 3.00 3.00 0.00
Special Event Permit Coordinator 18 0.00 1.00 0.00
Irrigation Technician 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parks Maint Worker Irrigation Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Florist 18 1.00 1.00 0.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech II 18 4.00 3.00 0.00
Cemetery Equipment Operators 17 4.00 4.00 0.00
Florist III 17 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Maint Worker III 16 1.00 0.00 0.00
Graffiti Response Field Tech 16 6.00 6.00 0.00
Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 16.00 20.00 0.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech I 16 1.00 2.00 0.00
Office Tech II 15 3.00 3.00 0.00
Parks Groundskeeper 12 9.00 10.00 0.00
Parks Total 72.00 80.00 0.00
Trails and Natural Lands Division
Trails & Natural Lands Division Director 32 1.00 1.00 0.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Open Space Lands Program Manager 29 0.00 0.00 0.00
District Supervisor 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Natural Lands Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 0.00
Volunteer & Outreach Coordinator 19 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 5.00 2.00 0.00
Parks Groundskeeper 12 1.00 0.00 0.00
Trails and Natural Lands Total 10.00 5.00 0.00
Urban Forestry Division
Urban Forestry Division Director 32 1.00 1.00 0.00
Urban Forestry Program Manager 29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Forestry Crew Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 0.00
Forest Area Service Coordinator 22 3.00 3.00 0.00
Arborist III 21 4.00 5.00 0.00
Arborist II 19 6.00 4.00 0.00
Arborist I 18 0.00 1.00 0.00
Urban Forestry Total 15.00 15.00 0.00
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT TOTAL 421.00 409.00 294.00
TOTALS BY FUND
General Fund 341.35 329.35 249.00
Fleet Management Fund 45.00 45.00 45.00
Golf Fund 34.65 34.65 0.00
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT
Public Lands Administration Transferred from Public Services
Parks & Public Lands Director 41 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Deputy Director Public Lands (38)
Public Lands Deputy Director 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 New FTE
Finance Manager II 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 New FTE
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 Transferred from Public Services Admin
Business Systems Analyst II 30 0.00 0.00 1.00
Landscape Architect III 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed to Public Landscape Planner
Comm/Events & Marketing Mgr 29 0.00 0.00 1.00
PPL Project Manager 28 0.00 0.00 1.00
PPL Landscape Planner 28 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed 1.0 from Landscape Arch III (29) ; 1.0 New FTE
PPL Asset Manager 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Warehouse Supervisor PG24
Community & Building Partnership Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 New FTE
Advertising/Marketing Mgr 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Parks Division
Special Events Permit Manager 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Parks Division
Warehouse Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed to Asset Manager PG 27
Parks Usage Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 1.00
Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 1.00
Special Event Permit Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Parks Division
Warehouse Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Sr Warehouse Operator to Warehouse
Specialist (PG15)
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed to Warehouse Specialist
Public Lands Administration Total 0.00 0.00 17.35
Parks Division Transferred from Public Services
Parks Division Director 35 0.00 0.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 0.00 0.00 2.00
Regional Athletic Complex Manager 29 0.00 0.00 1.00
City Sexton 28 0.00 0.00 1.00
Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 1.00
District Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 8.00
Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 1.00
Advertising/Marketing Mgr 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Moved to Public Lands Admin
Special Events Permit Manager 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Moved to Public Lands Admin
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 0.00 0.00 1.00
Metal Fabrication Tech 22 0.00 0.00 1.00
Events Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 1.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Plumber II 21 0.00 0.00 3.00
General Maintenance Worker III 21 0.00 0.00 4.00 1 Changed from Concrete Finisher (20), 3 Changed from
General Maintenance Worker IV (19)
Central Control Irrigation Specialist 20 0.00 0.00 2.00
Concrete Finisher 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed to General Maintenance Worker III (21)
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 0.00 0.00 1.00
General Maintenance Worker IV 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed to General Maintenance Worker III (21)
Special Event Permit Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 Moved to Public Lands Administration
Senior Florist 18 0.00 0.00 1.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech II 18 0.00 0.00 3.00
General Maintenance Worker II 18 1.00
Cemetery Equipment Operators 17 0.00 0.00 4.00
Graffiti Response Field Tech 16 0.00 0.00 6.00
Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 0.00 0.00 20.00 1 new FTE, 1 Changed to General Maintenance Worker II
(18)
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech I 16 0.00 0.00 2.00
Office Tech II 15 0.00 0.00 3.00
Parks Groundskeeper 12 0.00 0.00 10.00
Parks Total 0.00 0.00 78.00
Trails and Natural Lands Division Transferred from Public Services
PPL Deputy Director Planning & Ecological
Services 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Division Director (32)
Trails & Natural Lands Division Director 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed 1.0 to Deputy Director (38)
Strategy & Special Projects Manager 28 1.00 1.0 New FTE
District Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Natural Lands Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 1.00
Graphic Design Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 New FTE
Stewardship and Education Coordinator 22 1.00 Changed from Volunteer Coordinator (19)
Volunteer & Outreach Coordinator 19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Changed to Stewardship and Education Outreach (22)
Sr Natural Resource Technician 16 2.00 Changed from Senior Parks Groundskeeper (16)
Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New FTE, 2 Changed to Sr Natural Resource Technician
(16)
Parks Groundskeeper 12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Trails and Natural Lands Total 0.00 0.00 7.00
Urban Forestry Division Transferred from Public Services
Urban Forestry Division Director 32 0.00 0.00 1.00
Urban Forestry Program Manager 29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Forestry Crew Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 1.00
Forest Area Service Coordinator 22 0.00 0.00 3.00
Arborist III 21 0.00 0.00 5.00
Arborist II 19 0.00 0.00 4.00
Arborist I 18 0.00 0.00 1.00
Urban Forestry Total 0.00 0.00 15.00
Golf Division
Golf Program - Golf Fund Transferred from Public Services
Golf Division Director 35 1.00
Associate Director 33 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.65
Golf Professional III 30 1.00 Added III to the end
Golf Course Super 27 to 36 holes 29 1.00
Golf Course Super 18 holes 27 3.00
Golf Professional II 26 2.00 Changed from 18-hole Golf Professional to Golf Professional
II
Golf Superintendent 9 Hole 25 2.00
Golf Professional I 23 3.00
Changed from 9-hole Golf Professional to Golf Professional I;
2.0 changed from Assistant Golf Club Professional (20)
Player Development and Programs Mgr 21 1.00 1.0 changed from Assistant Golf Club Professional (20)
Assistant Golf Club Professional 20 4.00 2.0 changed to Golf Professional I (23); 1.0 changed to
Player Development and Programs Mgr (21)
Assistant Golf Course Super 20 12.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00
Office Tech II 15 1.00
Golf Subtotal for Golf Fund 0.00 0.00 33.65
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Golf Division Total 0.00 0.00 33.65
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT TOTAL 0.00 0.00 151.00
TOTALS BY FUND
General Fund 0.00 0.00 117.35
Golf Fund 0.00 0.00 33.65
DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY
Waste & Recycling Division Refuse Fund
Waste & Recycling Div Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager I 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste & Recycling Operations Manager 31 0.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Program Manager 28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Special Projects Analyst and Safety Coordinator 28 0.00 1.00 1.00
W&R Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from Maintenance Supervisor to W&R Operations
Supervisor (27)
Maintenance Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed from Maintenance Supervisor to W&R Operations
Supervisor (27)
W & R Permit Coordinator 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
W & R Education & Permits Lead 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed from W&R Education & Permits Lead to WR
Program Lead (20)
WR Program Lead 20 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from W&R Education & Permits Lead and Office
Tech II to WR Program Lead (20)
Waste & Recycling Equip Op II 18 29.00 28.00 29.00 Changed from Lead Equipment Operator to Waste &
Recycling Equip Op II (18)
Senior Equipment Operator 19 4.00 4.00 4.00
Lead Equipment Operator 20 4.00 4.00 3.00 Changed from Lead Equipment Operator to Waste &
Recycling Equip Op II (18)
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Tech II 15 4.00 4.00 3.00 Changed from Office Tech II to WR Program Lead (20)
W & R Education Specialist 15 5.00 5.00 5.00
Container Maintenance Worker 14 2.00 2.00 2.00
Waste & Recycling Total 56.00 56.00 56.00
Environ & Energy Division Refuse Fund
Sustainability Envir Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sustainability Deputy Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Energy Climate Program Mgr 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sustainability Program Manager 29 1.00 1.00 3.00 Changed from Sustainability Community Manager &
Sustainable Business Prog Coor to Sustainability Program
Manager (29)
Sustainability Community Manager 28 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed from Sustainability Community Manager to
Sustainability Program Manager (29)
Sustainable Business Prog Coor 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed from Sustainable Business Prog Coor to
Sustainability Program Manager (29)
Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Office Facilitator II to Special Projects
Assistant (21)
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed from Office Facilitator II to Special Projects
Assistant (21)
Environ & Energy Division Refuse Fund 7.00 7.00 7.00
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT (Refuse
Fund) TOTAL
63.00 63.00 63.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
Administration
Director--Public Utilities 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director-Public Utilities 39 1.00 2.00 2.00
Executive Assistant 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant-Appointed 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Chief Strategy & Innovations Officer 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
GIS Info Tech Systems Admin 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Engineer III-VII 26-36 3.00 0.00 0.00
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Mgr 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Safety Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
PU Communications Engagement Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
GIS Analyst II 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Change from a GIS Analyst (27)
GIS Coordinator 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
PU Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Professional Land Surveyor/GIS Spec 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
GIS Analyst 27 3.00 4.00 3.00 1 Change to a GIS Analyst II (30)
Engineer II 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Tech VI 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Community & Engagement Coordinator 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Employee Development Manager 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Util Dev Review Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utility Planner & Development Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Locator Manager 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Utility Planner 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
GIS Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech III-V 21-24 4.00 0.00 0.00
GIS Leak Detection Tech II 23 2.00 2.00 2.00
GIS Technician II 23 1.00 0.00 0.00
Public Relations Coordinator 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Util Dev Review Specialist 19 3.00 4.00 4.00
Office Technician II 15 0.00 2.00 2.00
Records Technician 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Sr. Utilities Representative - Cont 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Utility Locator 19 8.00 8.00 8.00
Administration Total 41.00 34.00 36.00
Maintenance
Operations Maint Superintendent 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Distribution System Mgr 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Computer Operation Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maint Support Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Storm Water Maint Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
WW Collection Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Irrigation Canal Systems Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water System Maintenance Super 27 4.00 4.00 4.00
Water System Operation Super 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Electrical Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Irrigation System Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Technical System Analyst III-IV 26-28 2.00 3.00 3.00
Water Service Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste Water Collection Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lift Station Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Storm Water Maintenance Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Water Meter Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Office Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Water Meter Tech 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Maint Coord Public Util 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Specialist 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Sr Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr. Utilities Rep. Office/Technical 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sr. Communications Coordinator-Public Util 15 6.00 6.00 6.00
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 6.00 6.00 6.00
Metal Fabrication Technician 22 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Water Dist System Operator 21 16.00 16.00 16.00
Senior Water System Maint Operator 21 16.00 16.00 16.00
Waste Water Collection Lead Maint Worker 21 6.00 6.00 6.00
WW Lift Station Lead Worker 21 0.00 0.00 4.00 3 Changed from Waste Water Lift Station Lead Wkr (20); 1
New Position
Drainage Maintenance Lead Worker 21 0.00 0.00 3.00 2 Changed from Drainage Maintenance Worker III (19), 1
New Position
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
General Maintenance Worker V 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to General Maintenance Worker III from a General
Maintenance Worker V
Senior Pumps Maint Tech 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Concrete Finisher 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Irrigation Operator 20 4.00 4.00 4.00
Waste Water Lift Station Lead Wkr 20 3.00 3.00 0.00 3 Changed to WW Lift Station Lead Worker (21)
Water System Maintenance Operator I-II 17-19 27.00 27.00 27.00
Water Meter Tech I-III 18-19 6.00 6.00 6.00
Waste Water Coll Maint Worker II 19 12.00 12.00 12.00
Drainage Maintenance Worker III 19 10.00 10.00 9.00 2 Changed to Drainage Maintenance Lead Worker (21), 1
New Position
Pumps Maintenance Technician 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Facility/Building Maint Wkr 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Maintenance Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Waste Water Lift Station Maint Wkr 18 3.00 4.00 4.00
Irrigation Operator II 17 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New Position
Landscape Restoration Lead Wkr 17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility/Building Maintenance Wkr 15 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 New Position
Water Distribution Valve Operator 15 8.00 8.00 8.00
Water Maintenance Support Wkr 14 2.00 2.00 2.00
Custodian II 11 2.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Total 173.00 175.00 180.00
Water Reclamation Plant
Water Reclamation Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Dept Manager 35 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineer VI 33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Rec Plant Operations & Maint Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Regulatory Compliance Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
WRF Maintenance Manager 31 0.00 1.00 1.00
Pretreatment Program Manager 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Laboratory Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Project Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pretreatment Compliance Specialist 25 1.00 0.00 0.00
Waste Water Business Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
W.W. Plant Maintenance Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Facility Process Control
Analyst
27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Facility Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Reclamation Safety Specialist 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
WRF Operations Supervisor 26 0.00 4.00 Changed from Water Reclamation Facility Lead Operator
Water Reclamation Facility Lead Operator 26 7.00 6.00 0.00 4 Changed to WRF Operations Supervisor; 2 Changed to
WRF Operator III's (21)
Fats, Oils & Grease Program Supervisor 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
WRF FOG/Sewer Rate Program Supervisor 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Instrumentation and Controls Technician II-IV 25-28 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 Changed from Painter II (20)
Technical Systems Analyst II-IV 24-28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Laboratory Chemist 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Pretreatment Inspect/Permit Writer 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lab Chemist 24 3.00 2.00 2.00
Water Reclamation Planner Scheduler 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Facility Operator IV 23 0.00 0.00 4.00 Changed from WRF Operator III (21)
Waste Water Senior Operator 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pretreatment Inspect/Permit Writer 23 4.00 4.00 4.00
Pretreatment Sr Sampler Inspect 19 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Facilitator II Non Union 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Technician II 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Sr Utilities Representative- Office /Technical 15 1.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 2.00 2.00 2.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
HVAC Technician II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste Water Plant Maint. Operator IV 21 8.00 8.00 8.00
Water Reclamation Facility Operator III 21 18.00 19.00 17.00 2 Changed from Water Reclamation Facility Lead Operator
(26); 4 Changed to WRF Operator IV (23)
Painter II 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Instrumentation & Cntl Tech IV (28)
Waste Water Preventative Maint Worker 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste Water Plant Maint. Operator I 15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Water Reclamation Plant Total 69.00 69.00 69.00
Finance
Finance Administrator 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager III 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
Customer Service Manager Public Utilities 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant IV 29 3.00 3.00 3.00
Financial Analyst III 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Metering Technologies Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant III 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Water Metering Technologies Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Billing Office Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Customer Services Supervisor 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Customer Service Accts/Coll Invent 18 6.00 6.00 6.00
Sr. Utilities Rep. - Generalist 15 9.00 9.00 9.00
Sr. Utilities Rep. - Customer Service 15 7.00 7.00 7.00
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Tech II 19 6.00 6.00 7.00 1 Changed from Water Meter Reader II (14)
Water Meter Reader III 18 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Water Meter Reader II (14)
Water Meter Reader II 14 7.00 7.00 5.00 1 Changed to Advanced Meter Infra Tech II (19); 1 Changed
to a Meter Reader III (18)
Finance Total 49.00 50.00 50.00
Water Quality & Treatment
Water Quality & Treatment Administrator 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Treatment Plant Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
L&C Cross Connection Control Manager 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Cross Connection Control Manager (26)
Regulatory Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pretreatment Program Manager 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Watershed Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Storm Water Quality Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Treatment Plant Assistant Manager 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Lead and Copper Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Project Manager 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Water Treatment Process Control Analyst 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
WTP Facility Manager/Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 3.00 Change from Water Treatment Plant Lead Operator (26)
Cross Connection Control Manager 26 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to L&C Cross Conn. Control Manager (30)
Watershed Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Technical System Analyst III 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Water Treatment Plant Lead Oper 26 3.00 3.00 0.00 Change to WTP Facility Manager/Supervisor (27)
Pretreatment Compliance Specialist 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Storm Water Compliance Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Storm Water Quality Coordinator 23 2.00 3.00 3.00
Cross Connections Control Coord 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
Pretreatment Inspect/Permit Writer 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Storm Water Technician II Union 22 0.00 0.00 2.00 Change from Stormwater Technician (21)
Storm Water Technician Union 21 2.00 2.00 0.00 Change to Stormwater Technician II (22)
Cross Connections Control Inspector 21 0.00 1.00 1.00
Pretreatment Sr Sampler Inspect 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Quality Assur Sr Samp Cl Water 17 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lead Watershed Ranger 21 2.00 2.00 4.00 Change to Lead Watershed Ranger; 2 Changed from
Watershed Ranger (19)
Watershed Ranger 19 5.00 5.00 4.00 2 Changed to Lead Watershed Ranger; 1 New Position
Water Plant Operator II 21 25.00 25.00 25.00
Water Quality & Treatment Admin Total 52.00 53.00 56.00
Water Resources
Water Resources Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Department Special Projects Manager 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilities Water Rights, Contracts and Property
Manager
30 1.00 1.00 1.00
PU Sustainability Manager 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Sustainability Program Manager 28 1.00 0.00 0.00
Water Conservation Program Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Change to 30 from 26
Water Resources Eng/Scientist 27 2.00 2.00 2.00 Change to 27 from 26
Water Rights & Property Agent 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
Property & Water Contracts Asst 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hydrology Specialist Union 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Conservation Technician 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
PU Records Prog Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Rights Assistant 16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Resources Total 8.00 10.00 11.00
Engineering
Chief Engineer - Public Utilities 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer III-VII 29-36 12.00 16.00 23.00 Dev-2-VII,1V, 2IV, 5 New positions: 3 Engineer IV's (31) & 2
Engineer V's (33); 1 Changed from an Engineer VI (34) to
and Engineer VII (36); 1 Changed from an Eng Tech VI (27);
1 Changed from an Eng Tech IV (23)
Sr Water Treatment Engineer 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Control Specialist 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Construction Program/Projects
Manager
29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer II 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Tech II - VI 19-27 17.00 Combined all Engineering Techs under Engineering
Engineering Tech IV- VI 23-27 9.00 9.00 0.00 1 Changed to an Engineer IV (34), Transferred 8 to
Engineering Tech II - VI
Engineering Tech III-V 21-24 0.00 5.00 0.00 1 Changed to an Engineer IV (31); 1 Transferred from Street
lighting, Transferred 5 to Engineering Tech II - VI.
Eng Contracts Coord Public Util 22 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Document Controls Specialist (18)
Engineering Tech III 21 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to Engineering Tech II - VI.
Engineering Tech II 19 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to Engineering Tech II - VI.
Document Controls Specialist 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Engineering Contracts Coord P.U. (22)
Administrative Secretary 18 0.00 0.00 1.00 New position
Engineering Tech I 17 0.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Streetlighting from Engineering
Contracts Process Coordinator 17 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Contracts Technician (15)
Contracts Technician 15 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Contracts Process Coordinator (17)
Engineering Total 32.00 42.00 48.00
Street Lighting
Engineer V 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech IV 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Engineering
Engineering Tech III 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from an Engineering Technician I (17)
Engineering Tech I 17 1.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred from Engineering to Streetlighting; Changed to
an Engineering Technician III (21).
Street Lighting Total 3.00 2.00 2.00
Grades 2019-20 20-2021 2021-2022
Changes from
FY 2020-21 to FY 21-22
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT TOTAL 427.00 435.00 452.00
Water Utility Fund 270.22 276.65 283.16
Sewer Utility Fund 120.63 122.01 126.55
Storm Water Utility Fund 33.65 34.82 39.57
Full Time
Street Lighting Fund 2.50 1.52 2.72
CITYWIDE GRANT FUNDED POSITIONS
Attorney's Office
Victime Advocate 0.00 0.00 1.00 Application Pending
Attorney's Office Total 0.00 0.00 1.00
Community & Neighborhoods
CARES Policy and Program Manager 25-27 0.00 0.00 3.00 Expires December 2022, with possible extensions
Youth and Family Program Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 Extend with ARP Funding
Special Projects Assistant for Community
Commitment Program
0.00 0.00 1.00 Possible ARP Funding
Associate Planners 0.00 0.00 0.00 Possible ARP Funding
Transportation Right of Way Utilization Manager 0.00 0.00 0.00 Possible ARP Funding
Treasury Policy and Program Manager 25-27 0.00 0.00 2.00 Expires December 2021, with possible extensions
Community & Neighborhoods Total 0.00 1.00 7.00
Economic Development
Economic Development Manager 29 0.00 0.00 2.00 Possible ARP Funding
Project Manager 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Possible ARP Funding
Arts Council Program Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Possible ARP Funding
Economic Development Total 0.00 0.00 2.00
Fire Department
Fire Fighter 22-27 0.00 0.00 4.00 Possible ARP Funding
Office Technician II 15 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Police - Fix the Bricks Grant
Fire Department Total 0.00 0.00 5.00
Finance Department
- Grant Administrator 0.00 0.00 1.00 Possible ARP Funding
- Grant Manager 0.00 0.00 1.00 Possible ARP Funding
- Business Analyst 0.00 0.00 0.00 Possible ARP Funding
Fire Department Total 0.00 0.00 2.00
Public Lands Department
Arborist 0.00 0.00 0.00 Possible ARP Funding
Fire Department Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL GRANT FUNDED POSITIONS 0.00 1.00 17.00
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ____ of 2021
(Adopting the City budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund
which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of
Salt Lake City, Utah for fiscal year 2021-2022)
An ordinance adopting the city budget, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is
separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City for fiscal year 2021-
2022.
PREAMBLE
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 10-6-111 of the Utah Code, the City Budget Officer
prepared and filed with the City Council a tentative budget in proper form for all funds for which
budgets are required by said law, including tentative budgets for the general fund, the library fund,
special revenue funds, debt service funds and the capital improvements funds for fiscal year 2021-
2022. The tentative budget was accompanied by a budget message as required by law.
That tentative budget was adopted by the City Council, in Resolution No. ____ of 2021,
on May 4, 2021.
Section 10-6-118 of the Utah Code requires that before the 30th day of June of each fiscal
year, or September 1, in case of a property tax increase under Sections 59-2-919 through 59-2-923
of the Utah Code, the governing body shall, by resolution or ordinance, adopt a budget for the
ensuing fiscal year for each fund for which a budget is required.
The City budget officer has prepared a budget, in proper form, for all funds for which
budgets are required by law. Section 2.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code states in part that
employment staffing documents shall be adopted as an element of the City’s budget, or otherwise,
as the City Council may require. Three copies of such documents have been filed for use and
examination of the public in the Office of the City Recorder whose permanent office is located at
451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 but which office is temporarily
located at 349 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84111.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to adopt a budget, except the
budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, for fiscal year 2021-2022, and to adopt
the employment staffing documents. All conditions precedent to the adoption of the budget, which
includes the employment staffing documents, have been accomplished.
SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF BUDGET. The budget attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance, shall be, and the same hereby is adopted as the budget of the City, excluding the
budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021
and ending June 30, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Sections 10-6-105, 10-6-118
and 59-2-923 of the Utah Code, subject to the conditions set forth herein. The budget is subject to
the approval of the Mayor and reconsideration of the City Council pursuant to Section 10-3b-204
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. EXHIBITS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE. The following
exhibits are incorporated by reference in the budget for fiscal year 2021-2022 and adopted as an
element of the budget:
A. The Key Changes for All Funds, labeled “Council Adopted June ________, 2021”;
B. The employment Staffing Document, labeled “Council Adopted June ________, 2021”; and
C. The Motion Sheet, labeled “Council Adopted June ________, 2021.”
SECTION 4. BUDGET CONTINGENCIES. The following contingencies apply to the
budget adopted for fiscal year 2021-2022:
1. Diversification of public safety response – Set aside $2 million from Funding our Future,
public safety category, in an appropriated account with a contingency, which will be
released by the Council after discussion with the Administration about the feasibility of
establishing community enforcement and support approaches that enhance community
safety and reduce the dependence on sworn police officers for duties that fall outside of
their scope.
2. Conditional appropriation about future dollars spent on foothill trails – Existing and
new funds for the construction, modification and decommissioning of trails built under the
Foothills Trail System Master Plan, Phase 1, will be placed on hold contingent on the
Administration’s review in collaboration with a broad spectrum of community stakeholders
of:
a. the implementation to date of the master plan;
b. identification of adjustments or additional engagement as warranted; and
c. the Council’s authorization to move forward after the Council evaluates the results
of the process.
The City Council is willing to provide funding to the Administration for one or more
outside experts who can objectively evaluate the technical and public policy aspects of the
trail changes and additions completed to date and anticipated in the master plan.
That written evaluation should focus on, but not be limited to, the extent to which trail
planning and development have been consistent with the vision, goals and principles in the
Master Plan, including: best practices; strategies for the preservation and stewardship of
the land; and respect for Tribal concerns. In addition, the written evaluation should include
an analysis of how the process could be adapted to better meet the needs and desires of all
users.
Existing and new funds for environmental studies will not be on hold, so long as such funds
are not used for construction or decommissioning of trails. Existing and new funds for
maintenance or repair of existing trails will be on hold, but may be released incrementally
by the Council as information about adherence to best practices and progress on community
feedback is received.
3. Conditional appropriation for ARPA dollars – set aside $1,583,500 million the City
grant fund for future appropriation once federal guidelines are officially finalized and
programs/proposals can be tailored to meet those guidelines, including for potential future
CIP discussions and reimbursements for eligible expenses the City already incurred.
4. Continued Contingency for All Funding Our Future -- Sales Tax Funds (this has been
adopted each year since the City implemented the sales tax). The Council approves
Funding Our Future sales tax revenue appropriations with the following conditions:
a. Expenditure of Funding Our Future Sales Tax Funds. Funding our Future funds
may not be expended unless the department or division expending the funds
complies with:
i. Utah Fiscal Procedures Act
ii. The City’s Procurement Code and Rules
iii. Written verification from the City Attorney and City Finance Director that
proper legal and financial procedures have been followed.
b. Other Funding Our Future Budget Contingencies:
i. The Administration providing a written semiannual spending,
implementation and outcomes report on each of the four critical need areas.
ii. Tracking funding for Fleet provided through the Funding our Future tax
separately to ensure it is spent only on public safety (police, fire, dispatch).
iii. The Administration spending funds in the four critical need areas as adopted
in the attached key changes spreadsheet.
iv. The Administration bringing back to the Council any proposed adjustments
to the adopted budget in a budget amendment for re-appropriation before
changes are made.
v. The Administration maintaining and regularly updating a publicly available
dashboard reflecting revenues received and actual uses.
vi. In FY21-22 and all future funding requests, providing a label denoting
which line items are funded with this Funding Our Future sales tax funds.
vii. For all positions added, the Administration shall submit an annual written
review along with the Mayor’s Recommended Budget to ensure that each
position continues to serve the critical need areas and, if a Council work
session briefing is scheduled, provide a presentation of the report.
5. New Contingent Appropriation - Small Business Outreach and Support. Allocation of
$100,000 from the general fund to the Department of Economic Development’s small
business outreach and support program during the City’s major capital projects is
contingent on the Administration determining by August 31, 2021 whether the program is
eligible for ARPA funding. If the program does qualify for ARPA, those Federal funds
would replace a total of $200,000 general fund dollars, including the additional $100,000
which was approved in this budget to ensure that the program could begin its work
immediately.
SECTION 5. FILING OF BUDGET. The City Budget Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to certify and file copies of said budget with the State Auditor as required by Section 10-
6-118 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 5. PUBLIC INSPECTION. The City Budget Officer is hereby authorized and
directed to certify and file copies of the budget in the office of said Budget Officer and in the
Office of the City Recorder whose permanent office is located at 451 South State Street, Room
415, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 but which office is temporarily located at 349 South 200 East, Salt
Lake City, UT 84111, which budget shall be available for public inspection during regular business
hours as required by Section 10-6-119 of the Utah Code.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be deemed effective on July 1,
2021.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of June , 2021
______________________________
Amy Fowler, Council Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman, Recorder
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________.
Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
Bill No. _______ of 2021.
Published: ____________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
Date:____________________
By:_________________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Katherine Lewis
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:June 15, 2021
RE: Sugar House Master Plan & Zoning Map Amendment at
Approximately 850 & 870 East 2100 South CC to CSHBD2
PLNPCM2020-00906 & 00925
The Council will be briefed about an ordinance to amend the zoning map and Sugar House Master Plan
Future Land Use Map for properties located at approximately 850 and 870 East 2100 South from the
current CC (Corridor Commercial) zoning designation to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District).
Previous uses of the property were a Nestle factory and offices (previously Snelgrove’s ice cream store and
factory) at 850 East and an office building at 870 East. Buildings on the property are now vacant. The
applicant proposes construction of a mixed-use development including residential and commercial space
on the approximately 3.24 acres.
Two petitions are associated with this request:
•Master Plan Amendment-The Sugar House Community Master Plan designates the subject
properties as “Mixed Use-Low Intensity.” The request is to amend the future land use map for the
parcels to “Business District Mixed Use-Neighborhood Scale.”
•Zoning Map Amendment-The applicant is requesting a zoning map amendment for the subject
properties from their current CC designation to CSHBD2.
The Planning Commission found there are no specific policies in the 2005 Sugar House Master Plan to
support or prohibit the proposed future land use map amendment.
Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: June 15, 2021
Set Date: June 15, 2021
Public Hearing: July 13, 2021
Potential Action: July 20, 2021
Page | 2
Vicinity map with subject parcels outlined in yellow
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendment, determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1.Is the Council supportive of the proposed rezone?
2.The Council may wish to ask if affordable housing units are planned for the proposed
development.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As shown on the map below, properties surrounding the subject parcels are a mix of zoning designations
including:
•CC: Corridor Commercial
•CSHBD2: Sugar House Business District
•FB-SE: Form Based Special Purpose Corridor Edge Subdistrict
•R-1-5000: Single-Family Residential
•RMF-35: Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential
Page | 3
Vicinity zoning map with subject parcels outlined in yellow.
MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff found the requested change to the Sugar House Master Plan future land use map is not
particularly significant as both current and proposed land use designations are mixed-use. The primary
reason for the master plan and zoning designation changes are to allow an additional 15’ of building height.
Planning staff also reviewed Plan Salt Lake (2015) which outlines an overall vision of sustainable growth
and development in the city. They found the proposed zoning map amendment and overall project aligns
with the plan’s vision and guiding principles and are supported by policies and strategies in the plan.
ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON
A table comparing building size limits, yard requirements, and some design requirements for the
current CC and proposed CSHBD2 zoning designations is below.
Corridor Commercial (CC) –
Existing Zoning
Sugar House Business
District (CSHBD2) –
Proposed Zoning
Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Area: 10,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width: 75’
No minimum lot area or width is
required.
Minimum Yard
Requirements
Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Front and Corner Side Yard: 15’
2. Interior Side Yard: None required.
3. Rear Yard: 10’
4. Buffer Yards: All lots abutting
Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Front and Corner Side Yard: No
minimum yard is required.
2. Maximum Setback: 15'
3. Interior Side Yard: None
Page | 4
property in a Residential District shall
conform to buffer yard requirements in
chapter 21A.48.
4. Rear Yard: No minimum yard is
required.
5. Buffer Yards: All lots abutting a
lot in a Residential District shall
conform to buffer yards and
landscape requirements in chapter
21A.48. In addition, for those
structures located on properties
zoned CSHBD that abut properties
in a Low Density, Single-family
Residential Zone, every 3’ in
building height above 30’ shall
require a corresponding 1’ setback
from the property line at grade.
The additional required setback
area can be used for landscaping
or parking.
Landscape Yard
Requirements
A landscape yard of 15’ shall be required
on all front and corner side yards,
conforming to the requirements of
section 21A.48.090 and subsection
21A.48.100C.
None required.
Maximum Building
Height
Maximum Building Height: No building
shall exceed 30’. Additional building
height of 15’ may be granted through the
Design Review in conformance with
chapter 21A.59 for a maximum of 45’, and
subject to additional landscaping
requirements.
The Maximum Building Height in
the CSHBD2 zone shall not exceed
30’ for buildings used
exclusively for nonresidential
purposes.
Additional square footage may be
obtained up to a maximum of 60’
if a residential component is
included in the development.
Buildings used exclusively for
residential purposes may be built
to a maximum of 60’.
First Floor/Street Level
Requirements
None The first floor of street level space
of all buildings with this area shall
be required to provide uses
consisting of residential, retail
goods establishments, retail
service establishments, public
service portions of businesses,
restaurants, taverns/brewpubs,
bar establishments, art galleries,
theaters or performing art
facilities.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment C of the Planning Commission staff report (pages 35-36 of the Administration’s transmittal)
outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal.
Planning staff found this proposal complies with applicable standards. Please see the Planning Commission
staff report for full details.
PUBLIC PROCESS
• January 6, 2021 The applicant presented and discussed the proposal at the Sugar House
Community Council meeting. The community council sent a letter to the Planning Commission in
Page | 5
support of the proposed rezone.
• February 10, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing notice was posted on the property.
• February 11, 2021 Public hearing notices mailed to nearby residents and property owners and
posted to City and State websites on this date.
• February 12, 2021 Newspaper notice of public hearing.
• The Planning Commission held a public hearing February 24, 2021. Several people spoke
primarily expressing opposition to the proposed rezone citing concerns with affordable housing,
density, and traffic. The Planning Commission forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation
to the City Council for the proposed rezone.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: Petitions PLNPCM2020-00906 & 00925
Sugar Town/Snelgrove Ice Cream Factory –
Sugar House Master Plan & Zoning Map Amendments
850 & 870 E. 2100 South
STAFF CONTACT: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner
(385)226-9056 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council amend the master plan & zoning map as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and
General Business Machines, LLC, has submitted applications for Master Plan Future Land Use
Map and Zoning Map amendments for the two parcels located at approximately 850 & 870 E.
2100 South in anticipation of a mixed-use type development (residential and commercial). The
applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Sugar House Master Plan from
“Mixed Use - Low Intensity” to “Business District Mixed-Use - Neighborhood Scale” and to
change the zoning on the subject property from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to CSHBD2
(Sugar House Business District).
April 15, 2021
Lisa Shaffer (May 5, 2021 16:34 MDT)
05/05/2021
05/05/2021
The Planning Commission found that there are no specific policies in the Sugar House Master
Plan (2005) that support the proposed future land use map amendment nor are there any specific
policies that would prohibit the proposed amendment. The basis for the request for the zoning
map amendment is based on additional building height (15’) that cold be realized should the
amendment be approved.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
● Early Notification – Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and
tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on December 16, 2020. In addition,
the Sugar House Community Council was also provided notification.
● Sugar House Community Council – The applicant presented and discussed the proposal
at the Sugar House Community Council meeting on January 6, 2021. Planning Staff was
in attendance. A letter from the Sugar House Community Council is attached in the
Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 24, 2021 (Exhibit 3b). The SHCC is
in favor of the proposed amendments.
● Planning Commission Meeting – On February 24, 2021, the Planning Commission held
a public hearing regarding the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments. The
Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation regarding
the proposal on to the City Council for decision. The staff report and minutes of the February
24, 2021 Planning Commission are found in Exhibit 3b & 3c respectively.
EXHIBITS:
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
a) ORIGINAL NOTICE & POSTMARK – February 12, 2021
b) NEWSPAPER NOTICE – February 12, 2021
c) STAFF REPORT – February 24, 2021
d) AGENDA & MINUTES – February 24, 2021
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
5. MAILING LIST
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2021
(Amending the zoning of the properties located at approximately 850 and 870 East 2100 South
Street from CC Corridor Commercial District to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District) and
amending the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to the properties located at 850 and
870 East 2100 South Street from CC Corridor Commercial District to CSHBD2 (Sugar House
Business District) pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00906 and amending the Sugar House
Master Plan Future Land Use Map pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00925.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on February
24, 2021 on an application submitted by Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and
General Business Machines, LLC to rezone the properties located at 850 and 870 East 2100
South Street (Tax ID Nos. 16-20-129-023 and 16-20-129-009) (the “Properties”) from CC
Corridor Commercial District to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District) pursuant to Petition
No. PLNPCM2020-00906, and to amend the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map
with respect to those parcels from Mixed Use - Low Intensity to Business District Mixed-Use -
Neighborhood Scale pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2020-00925; and
WHEREAS, at its February 24, 2021 meeting, the planning commission voted in favor of
forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said applications; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be
and hereby are rezoned from CC Corridor Commercial District to CSHBD2 (Sugar House
Business District).
SECTION 2. Amending the Sugar House Master Plan. The Future Land Use Map of
the Sugar House Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future land use
designation of the Properties identified in Exhibit “A” from Mixed Use - Low Intensity to
Business District Mixed-Use - Neighborhood Scale.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 201x.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance amending zoning and MP 850 and 870 E 2100 S
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney
April 14, 2021
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description for the Properties to be Rezoned and Subject to the Sugar House Master Plan
Future Land Use Map Amendment:
Address: 850 E. 2100 South
Tax ID No. 16-20-129-023
0610 BEG S 0^21'12" W 203.50 FT FR THE NE COR OF LOT 10, BLK 44, 10 AC PLAT A,
BIG FIELD SUR; S 0^21'12" W 67.10 FT; N 89^50'35" W 727.89 FT; N 0^20'03" E 115.16 FT;
E 139.31 FT; N 145.*
Contains 130,244 sq feet or 2.99 acres more or less.
Address: 870 E. 2100 South
Tax ID No. 16-20-129-009
0505 COM 9 RD W & 10 FT S FR NE COR LOT 10 BLK 44 10 AC PLAT A BIG FIELD SUR
W 4.59 RD S 142 FT E 4.59 RD N 142 FT TO BEG 6090-1450 6754-1107 8361-2124,2118
Contains 10,890 sq feet or .25 acres more or less.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
A) ORIGINAL NOTICE & POSTMARK – February 12, 2021
B) NEWSPAPER NOTICE – February 12, 2021
C) STAFF REPORT – February 24, 2021
D) AGENDA & MINUTES – February 24, 2021
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
5. MAILING LIST
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Sugar Town/Snelgrove Ice Cream Factory –
Sugar House Community Master Plan & Zoning Map Amendments
Petitions PLNPCM2020-00906 & 00925
November 12, 2020 Petitions received by the City.
December 10, 2020 Petitions assigned to and received by Lex Traughber.
December 10, 2020 The Sugar House Community Council was emailed notification of the
proposal.
December 16, 2020 Early notification mailed to property owners and tenants located within
300 feet of the subject property boundaries.
January 6, 2021 The applicant formally presented the proposal to the Sugar House
Community Council at their regularly scheduled monthly meeting.
February 10, 2021 Property posted with signs for the February 24, 2021 Planning
Commission hearing.
February 12, 2021 Notice of the Planning Commission’s May 22, 2019 Public Hearing
mailed to all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the
subject property. Listserve notification of Planning Commission agenda
emailed. Agenda posted on the Planning Division and State websites
February 12, 2021 Newspaper notice appears in the newspaper.
February 24, 2021 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Planning Commission voted
unanimously to forward a positive recommendation regarding the
requests on to the City Council for a decision.
March 1, 2021 Sent a draft ordinance to the City Attorney’s Office for review reflecting
the Planning Commission’s recommendation regarding the master plan
& zoning map amendments. Requested review of the draft ordinance.
Received ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office.
March 12, 2021 Transmittal submitted to CAN.
2. NOTICE OF COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2020-00906 & 00925–
Sugar Town/Snelgrove Ice Cream Factory – Sugar House Community Master Plan
& Zoning Map Amendments – Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and
General Business Machines, LLC, has submitted applications for a Master Plan Future Land Use
Map and Zoning Map amendments for the two parcels located at approximately 850 & 870 E.
2100 South in anticipation of a mixed-use type development (residential and commercial). The
applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Sugar House Master Plan
from "Mixed Use - Low Intensity" to "Business District Mixed-Use - Neighborhood Scale" and to
change the zoning on the subject property from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to CSHBD2
(Sugar House Business District). The intent of the request is to change the zoning of the
property to allow more flexibility to develop future multi -family residential, office or mixed-use
development. This project requires both a Master Plan and a Zoning Map amendment. The
subject property is located in Council District 7 represented by Amy Fowler (Staff contact: Lex
Traughber at (385) 226-9056 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com).
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: Room 315
City & County Building
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Lex
Traughber at (385) 226-9056 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday or via e-mail at lex.traughber@slcgov.com
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests
for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other
auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To
make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-
535-7600, or relay service 711.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
A. Original Notice & Postmark
February 12, 2021
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
B. Newspaper Notice
February 12, 2021
Order Number:
Referral Code:
From:Rankins, Marlene
To:Traughber, Lex
Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Order modified confirmation.
Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:33:05 AM
Hey Lex,
This is the type of confirmation they provide us with now for your file.
Thank you,
MARLENE RANKINS
Administrative Secretary
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-6171
Email marlene.rankins@slcgov.com
www.OurNeighborhoods.CAN.com
www.slc.gov/planning/
www.slc.gov/historic-preservation/
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as
possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding
and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning
Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with
development rights.
From: legals@deseretnews.com <legals@deseretnews.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:24 AM
To: Rankins, Marlene <Marlene.Rankins@slcgov.com>
Cc: ltapusoa@utahmediagroup.com
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Order modified confirmation.
THANK YOU for your business.
This is your confirmation that your order has been changed. Below are the details of your transaction. Please save this confirmation for
your records.
Job Details
DN0010647
Classification:
Other Notices
Package:
Legals
Order Cost:
$126.92
PC 2.24.21 NOTICE
Account Details
Planning Division
PO Box 145480
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480
801-533-6171
marlene.rankins@slcgov.com
Planning Division
Schedule for ad number DN00106470
Fri Feb 12, 2021
Deseret News Legals
All Zones
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
C. Staff Report
February 24, 2021
1
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
Staff Report
PLANNING DIVISION
_____________ COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
From: Lex Traughber – Senior Planner
(801) 535-6184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com
Date: February 24, 2021
Re: Sugar Town/Snelgrove Ice Cream Factory –
Sugar House Community Master Plan & Zoning Map Amendments
Petitions PLNPCM2020-oo906 & 00925
MASTER PLAN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS
PROPERTY ADDRESSES: 850 & 870 E. 2100 South
PARCEL IDs: 16-20-129-009 & 023
ZONING DISTRICT: CC – Commercial Corridor
MASTER PLAN: Mixed Use – Low Intensity
REQUEST: Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and General Business Machines, LLC, has
submitted applications for a Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map amendments for the two parcels
located at approximately 850 & 870 E. 2100 South in anticipation of a mixed-use type development (residential
and commercial). The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map in the Sugar House Master Plan
from “Mixed Use - Low Intensity” to “Business District Mixed-Use - Neighborhood Scale” and to change the
zoning on the subject property from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business
District). The following two petitions are associated with this request:
a. Master Plan Amendment - The associated future land use map in the Sugar House Community
Master Plan currently designates the subject properties as "Mixed Use – Low Intensity". The
petitioner is requesting to amend the future land use map for the parcels to " Business District
Mixed-Use – Neighborhood Scale ". Case number PLNPCM2020-00925
b. Zoning Map Amendment - The subject properties are currently zoned CC – Commercial
Corridor District. The petitioner is requesting to amend the zoning map designation of the
properties to C-SHBD2 – Sugar House Business District. Case number PLNPCM2020-00906
The Planning Commission’s role in these applications is to provide a recommendation to the City Council, who has final
decision making authority.
RECOMMENDATION: Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a positive
recommendation regarding the proposed amendments on to the City Council for consideration.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Vicinity Maps
B. Applicant Information
2
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
C. Analysis of Standards
D. Public Process and Comments
E. City Comments
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and General Business
Machines, LLC, has submitted applications for a Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map amendments
for the two parcels located at approximately 850 & 870 E. 2100 South in anticipation of a mixed-use type
development (residential and commercial). The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use Map in the
Sugar House Master Plan from “Mixed Use - Low Intensity” to “Business District Mixed-Use - Neighborhood
Scale” and to change the zoning on the subject property from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to CSHBD2
(Sugar House Business District). The intent of the request is to change the zoning of the property to allow more
flexibility to develop future multi-family residential, office or mixed-use development. The map below indicates the
approximate area to be potentially affected by the proposals.
The applicant has submitted detailed rationales for the proposed amendments in their applications. This
information is attached for review (Attachment B). Potential master plan and zoning amendment approvals
would allow for residential, commercial, or mixed-use type land uses in the future. A specific development plan
has been submitted to the City for “Design Review” (Petition PLNPCM2021-00025) consideration, and will be
presented to the Planning Commission for a decision at a later date. The task at hand for the Planning
Commission at this time is to consider whether or not an amendment to the Future Land Use Map adopted as part
of the Sugar House Master Plan, and a rezone of the subject property, is appropriate based on adopted City master
plan policies and the adopted standards for entertaining rezone requests.
3
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
PHOTOS OF SUBJECT SITE:
The Snelgrove property
as viewed from 2100
South looking
southwest.
Another view of the
Snelgrove property as
viewed from 2100
South looking
east/southeast.
4
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
View across the street
from the subject property
on 2100 South.
View of the southwest
corner of the property
from the 800 East and
Commonwealth Avenue
intersection looking east.
5
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
View of the southeast
corner of the property
along Commonwealth
Avenue looking
northwest.
View looking east down
Commonwealth Avenue
opposite the rear of the
Snelgrove factory.
6
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
The garages that front
on Commonwealth
Avenue opposite the
Snelgrove factory
building.
Looking west down
Commonwealth Avenue;
Snelgrove factory
building on the right
hand side of the photo.
7
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
The corner of 900 East
and Commonwealth
Avenue looking west.
ADJACENT LAND USES AND ZONING:
The subject property is currently zoned “Corridor Commercial” and is a parcel of property approximately 3.23
acres in size located between 2100 South and Commonwealth Avenue, and between 800 and 900 East. Please
refer to Attachment A – Vicinity Maps. An abandoned factory and vacant office buildings are currently sitting on
the property.
Surrounding zoning includes CC (Corridor Commercial) to the north, CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District)
adjacent and to the east, FB-SE (Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District) adjacent and to the west, and R-
1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential) and FB-SE to the south. With the exception of the residentially zoned
property located to the south, all surrounding adjacent property is used commercially.
Planning Staff notes that abutting residentially zoned property to the south of the subject property is separated by
Commonwealth Avenue, a city street. Commonwealth Avenue essentially functions as an alley in this case, with
garage access for the homes on Elm Avenue located on Commonwealth as demonstrated in the above photos. A
home located on the southeast corner of 800 East and Commonwealth is oriented toward 800 East.
The requests for the master plan future land use map amendment and the zoning map amendment are reasonable
requests based on consistency with surrounding land use and zoning.
Comparison of the Existing CC (Corridor Commercial) and the CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business
District) Zoning Districts
The subject property is zoned CC – Corridor Commercial. The purpose of the Corridor Commercial zoning district is:
The purpose of the CC Corridor Commercial District is to provide an environment for efficient and
attractive commercial development with a local and regional market area along arterial and major
collector streets while promoting compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods through design standards.
This district provides economic development opportunities through a mix of land uses, including retail
sales and services, entertainment, office and residential. Safe, convenient and inviting connections that
8
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
provide access to businesses from public sidewalks, bike paths and streets are necessary. Access should
follow a hierarchy that places the pedestrian first, bicycle second and automobile third. This district is
appropriate in areas where supported by applicable master plans. The standards are intended to
promote a safe and aesthetically pleasing environment to all users.
The applicant has requested that the property be rezoned to CSHBD2 – Sugar House Business District. The purpose of
the Sugar House Business District is:
The purpose of the CSHBD Sugar House Business District is to promote a walkable community with a
transit oriented, mixed use town center that can support a twenty four (24) hour population. The
CSHBD provides for residential, commercial and office use opportunities, with incentives for high
density residential land use in a manner compatible with the existing form and function of the Sugar
House master plan and the Sugar House Business District.
The major difference, and the primary reason for the master plan and zoning amendments, between the CC –
Corridor Commercial District and the CSHBD2 – Sugar House Business District lies in the maximum building
height allowed between the two zones. As shown in the table below, the maximum building height that could be
realized in the CC – Corridor Commercial District is 45’, and the maximum building height that could be realized
in the CSBD2 – Sugar House Business District is 60’. The land uses allowed in these two Districts per chapter
21A.33 – Land Use Tables are virtually identical.
Secondary differences between the two zones are that the CC requires more setbacks and associated landscaping,
while the CSHBD2 requires active ground floor uses along the public street frontages. The former would result in
a more open and suburban condition, while the latter would result in a more urban condition.
Finally, should the property be rezoned to CSHBD2, any new construction on the subject that exceeds 30’ in
height or twenty thousand square feet in size would be subject to the Design Review process, which is a public
process requiring Planning Commission action. In short, should the property be rezoned, the proposed building
would fall under review in a public setting.
Comparison of Zoning Ordinance Standards
A simplified table showing a comparison of the building size limits and yard requirements as well as some of the design
requirements for both zones is included below. This is extracted from the more detailed requirements for each zone
found in the Zoning Ordinance in Chapter 21A.32.080 – I – Institutional and Chapter 21A.24.180 – R/O – Residential/
Office.
Corridor Commercial (CC) –
Existing Zoning
Sugar House Business District
(CSHBD2) – Proposed Zoning
Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Area: 10,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width: 75’
No minimum lot area or width is required.
Minimum Yard
Requirements
Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Front and Corner Side Yard: 15’
2. Interior Side Yard: None required.
3. Rear Yard: 10’
4. Buffer Yards: All lots abutting
property in a Residential District shall
conform to buffer yard requirements in
chapter 21A.48.
Minimum Yard Requirements:
1. Front and Corner Side Yard: No minimum
yard is required.
2. Maximum Setback: 15'
3. Interior Side Yard: None
4. Rear Yard: No minimum yard is required.
5. Buffer Yards: All lots abutting a lot in a
Residential District shall conform to buffer
9
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
Comparing two key development standards, building height and setbacks, the CSHBD2 zone allows for more
building height than the CC Zone by 15’, the building setbacks are very similar (15’) with the difference being that
buildings in the CSHBD2 Zone may be built to the property line if so desired.
CITY WIDE MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS:
Sugar House Master Plan (2005)
The subject property is located within the Sugar House Master Plan (SHMP) area (see SHMP Future Land Use
Map – Attachment A). The associated Sugar House Future Land Use Map currently designates the property as "Mixed
Use – Low Intensity". The petitioner is requesting to amend the future land use map so that the property is designated
as "Business District Mixed Use – Neighborhood Scale". Note that both future land uses are similar as they are both
mixed-use designations. According to the SHMP on page 5, the “Neighborhood Scale Mixed- Use” designation is “lower
in scale (in reference to the “Town Center Scale Mixed Use” designation) but still orients directly to the street. Uses
include residential, retail, and commercial businesses or primarily small tenants. It is focused around a
transit/pedestrian oriented commercial/retail area with a strong street presence, wide sidewalks, street furnishings,
lighting and landscaping. The street level businesses are commercial and retail in nature, while the upper level can be
either residential or office depending on compatibility of the adjacent uses. Neighborhood Scale Mixed Use occurs
along the perimeter of the Business District, and acts as a transition to the adjacent residential and commercial areas.”
Several policies in the SHMP relate to the requested master plan amendment on various levels. The plan outlines the
following policies:
- Providing space for small tenants in the retail and office buildings that are developed (page 4).
- Increasing a residential presence through a mixed use land pattern (page 4).
- Directing development to be transit and pedestrian oriented (page 4).
yards and landscape requirements in chapter
21A.48. In addition, for those structures
located on properties zoned CSHBD that
abut properties in a Low Density, Single-
family Residential Zone, every 3’ in building
height above 30’ shall be required a
corresponding 1’ setback from the property
line at grade. The additional required
setback area can be used for landscaping or
parking.
Landscape Yard
Requirements
A landscape yard of 15’ shall be required on
all front and corner side yards, conforming
to the requirements of section 21A.48.090
and subsection 21A.48.100C.
None required.
Maximum Building
Height
Maximum Building Height: No building
shall exceed 30’. Additional building
height of 15’ may be granted through the
Design Review in conformance with
chapter 21A.59 for a maximum of 45’,
and subject to additional landscaping
requirements.
The Maximum Building Height in the CSHBD2
zone shall not exceed 30’ for buildings used
exclusively for nonresidential purposes.
Additional square footage may be obtained up
to a maximum of 60’ is a residential component
is included in the development. Buildings used
exclusively of residential purposes may be built
to a maximum of 60’.
First Floor/Street Level
Requirements
None
The first floor of street level space of all
buildings with this area shall be required to
provide uses consisting of residential, retail
goods establishments, retail service
establishments, public service portions of
businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar
establishments, art galleries, theaters or
performing art facilities.
10
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
Discussion: The requested change to the future land use map in the SHMP is not particularly significant given
that the current and proposed land use designations are both mixed-use in nature. There are no specific policies
in the SHMP that support the proposed future land use map amendment nor are there any specific policies that
would prohibit the proposed amendment. As previously noted, the basis for the requested change to the SHMP
and the rezone request are based on additional building height (15’) that could be realized should the amendment
be approved.
Plan Salt Lake (2015)
Plan Salt Lake outlines an overall vision of sustainable growth and development in the city. This includes the
development of a diverse mix of uses which is essential to accommodate responsible growth. At the same time,
compatibility, how new development fits into the scale and character of existing neighborhoods is an important
consideration. New development should be sensitive to the context of surrounding development while also providing
opportunities for new growth.
Guiding Principles specifically outlined in Plan Salt Lake include the following:
Growing responsibly while providing people with choices about where they live, how they live, and
how they get around.
A beautiful city that is people focused.
A balanced economy that produces quality jobs and foster an environment for commerce, local
business, and industry to thrive.
The proposed zoning map amendment and overall project is aligned with the vision and guiding principles
contained in Plan Salt Lake and are supported by the policies and strategies in the document.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed master plan and zoning map amendments meet or are able to meet standards for these types of
requests as outlined in Attachment C.
NEXT STEPS:
The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration as part
of the final decision on these petitions.
11
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAPS
12
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
AREA ZONING
13
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
ATTACHMENT B: APPLICANT INFORMATION
14
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
ATTACHMENT C: ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENTS
State Law, Utah Code Annotated, Title 10 Chapter 9a, requires that all municipalities have a master plan. However,
there is no specific criteria relating to master plan amendments. The City does not have specific criteria relating to
master plan amendments. However, City Code Section 21A.02.040 – Effect of Adopted Master Plans or General Plans
addresses this issue in the following way:
All master plans or general plans adopted by the planning commission and city council for the city, or
for an area of the city, shall serve as an advisory guide for land use decisions. Amendments to the text of
this title or zoning map should be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the
applicable adopted master plan or general plan of Salt Lake City. (Ord. 26-95 § 2(1-4), 1995)
In this case, the master plan is being amended in order to provide consistency between the Sugar House Master Plan and
the proposed zoning designation of the subject property. State Law does include a required process in relation to a public
hearing and recommendation from the Planning Commission in relation to a master plan amendment. The required
process and noticing requirements have been met.
ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS
21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed
to the legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making a decision to
amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider the following:
Factor Finding Rationale
1. Whether a proposed map
amendment is consistent
with the purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through
its various adopted
planning documents.
Complies Based on the existing land uses in the vicinity of the subject
property, the development pattern of the surrounding
neighborhood, and the adopted master plans, amending the zoning
map for the subject parcels from CC (Corridor Commercial District) to
CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District) is appropriate.
2. Whether a proposed map
amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements
of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to promote the health, safety,
morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the present and
future inhabitants of Salt Lake City, to implement the adopted plans of
the city, and, in addition:
A. Lessen congestion in the streets or roads;
B. Secure safety from fire and other dangers;
C. Provide adequate light and air;
D. Classify land uses and distribute land development and
utilization;
E. Protect the tax base;
F. Secure economy in governmental expenditures;
G. Foster the city's industrial, business and residential
development; and
H. Protect the environment. (Ord. 26-95 § 2(1-3), 1995)
The proposed zone change from CC to CSHBD2 would support the
purposes of the zoning ordinance found in Chapter 21A.02.030:
Purpose and Intent as outlined above. The change would help to
distribute land and utilizations (D.), while helping to support the
city’s residential and business development (G.)
15
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
3. The extent to which a
proposed map amendment
will affect adjacent
properties;
Complies
It is Planning Staff’s opinion that the proposed zoning map
amendment could have a positive impact on adjacent properties
with thoughtful future development with an emphasis on
appropriate and compatible design.
4. Whether a proposed map
amendment is consistent
with the purposes and
provisions of any applicable
overlay zoning districts
which may impose
additional standards
N/A
The subject property is not located within any designated overlay
zoning districts.
5. The adequacy of public
facilities and services
intended to serve the
subject property, including,
but not limited to,
roadways, parks and
recreational facilities,
police and fire protection,
schools, stormwater
drainage systems, water
supplies, and wastewater
and refuse collection.
Complies The proposal was reviewed by the various city departments tasked
with administering public facilities and services (see comments –
Attachment E). The city has the ability to provide services to the
subject property. The infrastructure may need to be upgraded at the
owner’s expense in order to meet specific City requirements.
If the rezone is approved, the proposal will need to comply with
these requirements for future development or redevelopment of the
site. Public Utilities, Engineering, Transportation, Fire, and Police
and other departments will also be asked to review any specific
development proposals submitted at that time.
16
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
ATTACHMENT D: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS
Meetings & Public Notice
The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the
proposed project.
January 6, 2021 – The applicant presented and discussed the proposal at the Sugar House Community Council
meeting. Planning Staff was in attendance. A letter from the Sugar House Community Council is attached for
review. The SHCC is in favor of the proposed amendments.
Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing for the proposal include:
• Property posted on February 10, 2021.
• Notices mailed on February 11, 2021.
• Agenda posted on the Planning Division and Utah Public Meeting Notice websites on February 11, 2021.
• Newspaper Notice of Public Hearing – February 12, 2021
Letter to PC Sugar Town Rezone.doc www.sugarhousecouncil.org 1
February 2, 2020
TO: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
FROM: Judi Short, First Vice Chair and Land Use Chair
Sugar House Community Council
RE: PLNPCM2020-00906 Snelgrove Property – Sugar House Master Plan (SHMP) and Zoning Map Amendments
We are writing you concerning the proposed Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map Amendment for the two parcels at
850 and 870 East 2100 South. This parcel has long been known as Snelgrove’s Ice Cream, with a store and ice cream factory. More
recently, it was Nestle’s with just a factory. I’ve often wondered why we had a factory in the heart of Sugar House. The parcels are
zoned CC Commercial Corridor, the purpose of which is to provide an environment for efficient and attractive automobile oriented
commercial development along arterial and major collector streets. However, the Sugar House Master Plan Future Land Use Map calls
for it to be Business District Mixed Use – Neighborhood Scale. The petitioner is asking that this be rezoned to CSHBD2. The purpose of
that zone is to promote a walkable community with a transit oriented, mixed use town center that can support a twenty-four-hour
population. The CSHBD provides for residential, commercial and office use opportunities, with incentives for high-density residential
land use in a manner compatible with the existing form and function of the Sugar House master plan and the Sugar House Business
district.
We have a bus route on 2100 south with 15-minute service now, and this is a block from the S-Line. Our Transportation Committee is
working with the city to try to add bike lanes along 2100 South, which could make it more comfortable for pedestrians.
At the time the SHMP was updated in 2005, we talked about bringing the CSHBD2 zone all along 2100 South (the Lincoln Highway) to
700 East. However, there were businesses along that section from 900 East to 700 East, that would then be non-conforming, and it
didn’t go any further. That zone stopped at 900 East. A number of us have been talking about doing extending the CSHBD2 since that
time. Please note this petition is only for these two parcels. The rest of the parcels on this block and across the street, and west of
800 East will remain CC for now.
The CC zone allows most of the same uses as CSHBD2, but it also allows things like bus stations, warehouses, and other things that
really don’t fit along that corridor. The advantage of the CSHBD2 zone is that it has design guidelines, so that new development has to
be consistent with the standards set in the master plan, those are evident in the newly built parts of the Sugar House Business District.
The other advantage of the rezone is it would allow for additional height, and the applicant has said that will allow him to build a floor
of affordable housing to the project. The applicant says he has convinced the property owner that it is the right thing to do. One thing
we especially like it that it will allow the community to have some input into the design of anything that is built in this zone.
We have met with the applicant at two SHCC Land Use and Zoning meetings and he presented his plans at least on community council
meeting. This is on our website, and a link has been in our newsletter at least twice. I have attached the comments that we received.
I know at least once, I asked the group of about 35 on the zoom call if anyone had any objections to the rezone, and not a word was
spoken.
We are in favor of this rezone.
17
Snelgrove Publish Date: Feb 24, 2021
ATTACHMENT E: CITY COMMENTS
Date Task/Inspection Status/Result Action By Comments
11/12/2020 Pre-Screen Accepted Anglin, Anna John,
Thank you for submitting your zoning
amendment application. It appears to be a
complete application as a preliminary review.
However, once the planner assigned to it does a
thorough review, they may ask for additional
information. There is a fee balance of $283.25
for processing 1+ acres and noticing fees. I
have attached instructions on how to pay for
the balance on line through the Citizens Access
Portal. The project number is PLNPCM2020-
00906 – Snelgrove Ice Cream Plant in
Sugarhouse Rezone.
Thanks,
ANNA ANGLIN
Principal Planner
12/2/2020 Staff Assignment Assigned Traughber, Lex
12/10/2020 Planning Dept Review In Progress Traughber, Lex
12/10/2020 Staff Assignment Routed Traughber, Lex
1/8/2021 Engineering Review Complete Weiler, Scott No objections.
1/27/2021 Building Review Complete Mikolash, Gregory Building Services finds no problem with the
proposed amendments – This would include
Zoning, Fire and Building Code.
1/27/2021 Community Council Review Complete Traughber, Lex The applicant met with the Sugar House
Community Council on 1/6/2021.
1/27/2021 Fire Code Review Complete Mikolash, Gregory Building Services finds no problem with the
proposed amendments – This would include
Zoning, Fire and Building Code.
1/27/2021 Police Review Complete Traughber, Lex PD has no issues with these plans per Lamar
Ewell - SLC Police
1/27/2021 Public Utility Review Complete Draper, Jason No objection to the proposed Master Plan and
Zoning Map amendments. The proposed
development or others that would fit the
proposed zoning may require water, sewer, and
storm drain improvements. The site will need
to meet stormwater requirements for detention
and green infrastructure.
1/27/2021 Staff Review and Report In Progress Traughber, Lex
1/27/2021 Transportation Review Complete Barry, Michael Transportation has no comments on these
proposals.
1/27/2021 Zoning Review Complete Mikolash, Gregory Building Services finds no problem with the
proposed amendments – This would include
Zoning, Fire and Building Code.
2/4/2021 Community Council Review Complete Traughber, Lex
2/4/2021 Planning Dept Review Complete Traughber, Lex
2/4/2021 Staff Review and Report Draft Traughber, Lex
Work Flow History Report
PLNPCM2020-00906
850 E 2100 S
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
D. Agenda & Minutes
February 24, 2021
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the
Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation
February 24, 2021 at 5:30 p.m.
(The order of the items may change at the Commission’s discretion)
This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County Building. Commission Members
will connect remotely. We want to make sure everyone interested in the Planning Commission meetings
can still access the meetings how they feel most comfortable. If you are interested in watching the Planning
Commission meetings, they are available on the following platforms:
• YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
• SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting or provide general
comments, email; planning.comments@slcgov.com or connect with us on Webex at:
• http://tiny.cc/slc-pc-02242021
Instructions for using Webex will be provided on our website at SLC.GOV/Planning
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR JANUARY 10, 2021
REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Modifications to Izzy South Design Review at approximately 534 East 2100 South -
A request by Ryan McMullen for Design Review and Special Exception approval to develop a 71-unit
mixed use building located at approximately 534 East 2100 South in the Community Business CB
zoning district. The applicant received Design Review approval on December 9, 2020 for
a building over 15,000 square feet in size and Special Exception approval to allow 3' of additional
building height. Since that time, the applicants modified their design to include additional building
materials on the south and north facades. In accordance with section 21A.59.080, these types of
modifications to the approved Design Review plans require approval from the Planning Commission.
The project is located within Council District 7, represented by Amy Fowler (Staff contact: Caitlyn
Miller at (385) 315- 8115 or caitlyn.miller@slcgov.com) Case number: PLNPCM2020-00222
2. Snelgrove Ice Cream Factory Property MP and Rezone at approximately 850 & 870 East 2100
South - Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and General Business Machines, LLC,
has submitted applications for a Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map amendments for
the two parcels located at approximately 850 & 870 E. 2100 South in anticipation of a mixed-use type
development (residential and commercial). The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land
Use Map in the Sugar House Master Plan from "Mixed Use-Low Intensity" to "Business District Mixed-
Use-Neighborhood Scale" and to change the zoning on the subject property from CC (Corridor
Commercial District) to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District). The following two petitions are
associated with this request:
a. Master Plan Amendment - The associated future land use map in the Sugar House
Community Master Plan currently designates the properties as "Mixed Use – Low
Intensity". The petitioner is requesting to amend the future land use map for the parcels to
"Business District Mixed-Use – Neighborhood Scale". Case number PLNPCM2020-00925
b. Zoning Map Amendment - The properties are currently zoned CC – Commercial Corridor
District. The petitioner is requesting to amend the zoning map designation of the properties
to C-SHBD2 – Sugar House Business District. Case number PLNPCM2020-00906
The subject project site is located in Council District 7 represented by Amy Fowler (Staff contact: Lex
Traughber at (385) 226-9056 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com)
3. Reilly Planned Development & Preliminary Subdivision Plat at approximately 1159 E 1300 S -
A request by Anthony Reilly, property owner, for approval of a preliminary subdivision plat as a
planned development to divide one existing lot into two lots at the above-mentioned address. Planned
development approval is required for reduced lot width (from 50 feet to 46 and 40.25 feet) and a
reduced side yard setback on Lot 1 (4 feet to 3 feet). The property is zoned R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential) and within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Amanda Roman
at (385) 386-2765 or amanda.roman@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00681 &
PLNSUB2020-00683
4. Conditional Use for an ADU at approximately 1395 E Michigan Avenue – Prescott Muir, property
owner, is requesting Conditional Use approval for an attached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) located
in the basement of the existing single-family dwelling at the above-listed address. The applicant is
proposing a two-bedroom apartment measuring 963 square feet in size. The property is zoned R-
1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential) and is within Council District 6, represented by Dan Dugan. (Staff
contact: Amanda Roman at (385) 386-2765 or amanda.roman@slcgov.com) Case number
PLNPCM2020-00944
For Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes, visit the Planning Division’s website at slc.gov/planning/public-
meetings. Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified,
which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.
Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Page 2
Judi Short – Stated the purpose of a Design Review is to get a better result; she does not believe that
the proposal is doing that.
Devin O’Donnell – Stated his opposition of the request and raised concern with lack of low -income
housing.
Eli Kauffman – Stated her opposition of the request.
Eoin Daxter – Stated his opposition of the request and raised concerns with the affordabilit y.
Soren Simonsen – Raised concern with proposed material.
Michelle Mower – Stated her opposition of the request.
Paula Mendoza – Stated her opposition of the request.
Lynn Schwartz – Provided an email comment stating opposition of the request.
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer closed the Public Hearing.
The Commission made the following comments:
• The purpose of these projects are to build density
MOTION
Commissioner Bell stated, based on the information in the staff report and the information
received in the meeting I move that the Planning Commission approve the requested modification
to petition numberPLNPCM2020-00222 for Izzy South located at approximately 534 East 2100
South.
With the following modification:
1. That the applicant
Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins, Lee,
Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passed unanimously.
Snelgrove Ice Cream Factory Property MP and Rezone at approximately 850 & 870 East 2100
South - Mark Isaac, representing Sugarhouse Village, LLC, and General Business Machines, LLC, has
submitted applications for a Master Plan Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map amendments for the two
parcels located at approximately 850 & 870 E. 210 0 South in anticipation of a mixed -use type
development (residential and commercial). The applicant is requesting to amend the Future Land Use
Map in the Sugar House Master Plan from "Mixed Use -Low Intensity" to "Business District Mixed -Use-
Neighborhood Scale" and to change the zoning on the subject property from CC (Corridor Commercial
District) to CSHBD2 (Sugar House Business District). The following two petitions are associated with this
request:
a. Master Plan Amendment - The associated future land use map in the Sugar House
Community Master Plan currently designates the properties as "Mixed Use – Low
Intensity". The petitioner is requesting to amend the future land use map for the parcels to
"Business District Mixed -Use – Neighborhood Scale". Case number PLNPCM2020-00925
Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Page 3
b. Zoning Map Amendment - The properties are currently zoned CC – Commercial Corridor
District. The petitioner is requesting to amend the zoning map designation of the properties
to C-SHBD2 – Sugar House Business District. Case number PLNPCM2020-00906
The subject project site is located in Council District 7 represented by Amy Fowler (Staff contact: Lex
Traughber at (385) 226-9056 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com)
Lex Traughber, Senior Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in the case
file). He stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to
the City Council.
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Clarification on whether there is an intent to
Mark Isaac, applicant, provided further information.
The Commission, Staff and Applicant discussed the following:
• I would like to suggest that
• Clarification on setback requirements
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing;
Judi Short, Land Use Chair Sugar House Community Council – Stated her support of the rezone request.
David Fernandez – Stated his opposition of the request.
Eli Kauffman – Stated her opposition of the request.
Eoin Daxter – Stated concerns with affordable housing in the neighborhood.
Michelle Mower – Stated concerns with affordable housing.
Soren Simonsen – Stated his opposition of the request.
Lexi Langford – Stated her opposition of the request.
Tom Greenleigh – Stated his opposition of the request.
Tyler Adams – Raised concerns with affordable housing.
Stephanie Christian – Provided an email comment stating her opposition of the request.
Hollie Brown – Provided an email comment stating her opposition of the request and raised concerns
with added traffic.
Kimia Golchin – Stated her opposition of the request.
Annie Lim – Stated her opposition of the request and raised concerns with affordable housing.
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer closed the Public Hearing.
Salt Lake City Planning Commission February 24, 2021 Page 4
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Clarification on sidewalk requirements
• Clarification on whether parking is included
• Clarification on whether there has been a requirement for affordable housing
MOTION
Commissioner Young-Otterstrom stated, based on the analysis and findings in the staff report
that amendments for Master Plans and the standards for Zoning Map Amendments have been
substantially met, testimony and the proposal presented, I move that the Planning Commission
forward a positive recommendation to the City Council in suppor t of the proposed amendments
located at approximately 850 & 870 E. 2100 South. PLNPCM-00906 & 00925
Commissioner Bell seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins, Lee,
Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passe d unanimously.
The Commission took a short break.
Reilly Planned Development & Preliminary Subdivision Plat at approximately 1159 E 1300 S -
A request by Anthony Reilly, property owner, for approval of a preliminary subdivision plat as a planned
development to divide one existing lot into two lots at the above -mentioned address. Planned
development approval is required for reduced lot width (from 50 feet to 46 and 40.25 feet) and a
reduced side yard setback on Lot 1 (4 feet to 3 feet). The property is zoned R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential) and within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Amanda Roman at
(385) 386-2765 or amanda.roman@slcgov.com ) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00681 &
PLNSUB2020-00683
Amanda Roman, Principal Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in the
case file). She stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve the request with the
conditions listed in the staff report.
Anthony Reilly, applicant, provided further information.
The Commission, Staff and Applicant discussed the following:
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing; seeing no one wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer
closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION
Commissioner Barry stated, based on the findings listed in the staff report, the information
presented, and input received during the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission
approve the Planned Development petition (PLNPCM2020 -00681) and Preliminary Subdivision
Plat (PLNSUB2020-00683) as proposed, subject to complying with the conditions listed in the staff
report.
Commissioner Bachman seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins,
Lee, Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passed unanimously.
Vice Chairperson Barry continued the meeting.
4. ORIGINAL PETITIONS
5. MAILING LIST
MOUNTAIN STATE TEL & TEL CO
OLATHE, KS 66063
PO BOX 2599
MKP FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/14/2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84158
PO BOX 58564
MKP FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/14/2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84158
PO BOX 58564
MKP FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/14/2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84158
PO BOX 58564
MKP FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/14/2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84158
PO BOX 58564
FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION
INCORPORATED
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2060 S WINDSOR ST
NUPETCO ASSOCIATES
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2001 S WINDSOR ST
PETTY INVESTMENT CO.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2001 S WINDSOR ST
PETTY MOTOR COMPANY
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2001 S WINDSOR ST
ANDERSON INVESTMENT CORP.
HIGHLAND, UT 84003
5455 W 11000 N # 202
ANDERSON INVESTMENT CORP.
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
777 E 2100 S
BICYCLE ENTERPRISES LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
803 E 2100 S
MKP FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/14/2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84158
PO BOX 58564
A & A FUNK, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
2582 S ELIZABETH ST # 4
FELLOWSHIP FOUNDATION
INCORPORATED
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2060 S WINDSOR ST
YOUNG S LEE
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
825 E 2100 S
BICYCLE ENTERPRISES, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
803 E 2100 S
CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84150
50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST
MELISSA L SOUTHWICK
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
2152 S 800 E
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
2160 S 800 E
JILL C HALL
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
2166 S 800 E
A SERIES OF 2172 S
SANDY, UT 84092
11289 S WYNGATE LN
774 ASSOCIATES LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
774 E 2100 S
ANDERSON INVESTMENT CORPORATION
AMERICAN FORK, UT 84003
5455 W 11000 N #202
NUPETCO ASSOCIATES LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2001 S WINDSOR ST
NUPETCO ASSOCIATES LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2001 S WINDSOR ST
HOWTON PROPERTIES LLC
ATLANTA, GA 30355
PO BOX 52427
PHOENIX OF SALT LAKE CITY, LLC
DEERFIELD, IL 60015
PO BOX 1159
NUPETCO ASSOCIATES, LLC; UINTAH
INVESTMENT, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84105
2001 S WINDSOR ST
GENERAL BUSINESS MACHINES, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84108
1828 S WASATCH DR
921 PROPERTIES LC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84124
4070 S EVELYN DR
SUGARHOUSE VILLAGE, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
1165 E WILMINGTON AVE
2010 VENTURES, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
812 E 2100 S
SKH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC
PARK CITY, UT 84098
1280 FOXCREST CT
DALE F BONDARUK
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104
1455 W WASATCH AVE
ALEXA LANGFORD
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
833 E ELM AVE
SHAUN FUHRIMAN
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
837 E ELM AVE
KAYCEE NIPPER; LANDY NIPPER; PAUL
NIPPER (JT)
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
841 E ELM AVE
ELM AVENUE HOME LLC
OGDEN, UT 84402
1680 NAVAJO DR
HEIDI M BEINTEMA; RACHEL BRUNO
SAN DIEGO, CA 92116
4223 MEADE AVE
JLF VENTURES LLC
DRAPER, UT 84020
13827 S SPRAGUE LN
GRODBROS REAL ESTATE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP LLLP
PARK CITY, UT 84068
PO BOX 680365
AURELIO RUELAS
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
1015 E ELM AVE
WASATCHRENTALPROPERTIES, LLC
PARK CITY, UT 84098
110 MATTERHORN DR
AURELIO RUELAS
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
1015 E ELM AVE
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114
PO BOX 144575
ELIZABETH M HUELSKAMP
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
2151 S 800 E
3AS SUGARHOUSE LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116
867 N AMERICAN BEAUTY DR
TARTARO REVOCABLE LIVNG TRUST
06/17/2015
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
2167 S 800 E
ALICE U ESPINOSA
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
820 E ELM AVE
KIMIA GOLCHIN; MAGGIE NARTOWICZ (JT)
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
826 E ELM AVE
RHAMA RENTALS LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103
524 N MAIN ST
ROBERT V HARRELL
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
836 E ELM AVE
DEBRA S GRIMES
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
840 E ELM AVE
LA BREDIN LEGACY TRUST 9/15/2017
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
844 E ELM AVE
KAIA ANNE RAGNHILDSTVEIT; OYVIND
RAGNHILDSTVEIT; TIFFANY RAGNHILD
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
850 E ELM AVE
BARBARA L MCCAULEY
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106
854 E ELM AVE
MARK R MORRIS
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111
35 E 100 S # 602
MATTHEW P MANES; MARK MORRIS (JT)
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111
35 E 100 S
GRODBROS REAL ESTATE LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP LLLP
PARK CITY, UT 84060
3642 OAKWOOD DR
GRODNIK PROPERTIES, LLC
PARK CITY, UT 84060
3642 OAKWOOD DR
SMITH'S FOOD KING PROPERTIES INC
CINCINNATI, OH 45202
1014 VINE ST 7TH FLOOR
Current Occupant
2023 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
2027 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
2027 S 800 E #NFF1
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
2029 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
2021 S WINDSOR ST
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
2035 S WINDSOR ST
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
2030 S 900 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Current Occupant
767 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
809 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
815 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
837 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
827 E 2100 S #NFF1
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
724 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
2172 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
790 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
863 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
867 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
875 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
909 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
935 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
870 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
880 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
850 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
823 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
829 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
847 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
851 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
857 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
859 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
2141 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
2147 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
818 E COMMONWEALTH AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
820 E COMMONWEALTH AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
2165 S 800 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
830 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
858 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
866 E ELM AVE
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
2148 S 900 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
2166 S 900 E
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
Current Occupant
922 E 2100 S
Salt Lake City, UT 84106
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
From:george chapman
To:Traughber, Lex
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments against Case PLNPCM2020-00906, PLNPCM2020-00925 at Planning Commission
Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 4:38:12 PM
I am concerned but supportive of the project on the former Snelgrove site due to the need for
wide sidewalks since the only safe way to ride a bike on 2100S. is on a raised and wide
sidewalk. In addition, any entrance and/or exit should be away from 2100S 900E intersection
for safety reasons (and an important bus stop).
Otherwise, this project is an important and much needed addition to Sugar House. If needed,
please give the developer flexibility in height to allow wider sidewalks.
From:Mark Morris
To:Planning Public Comments; Traughber, Lex
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Email in support of Petition PLNPCM2020-00906: Snelgrove Site Rezone
Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 12:24:58 PM
SLC Planning Commission-
I'm emailing in support of the petition to update the city's land use map and zoning
ordinance to permit the 'Snelgrove Ice Cream' parcel in Sugar House to proceed.
I have owned a home on Elm Avenue directly south of this parcel for the last 15 years. I have
welcomed the investments and added activity in the Sugar House business district over the last
decade. With each new project, we've added much desired housing and walkability for the
neighborhood. Having been in this part of the city for many years, the walkability has much
improved over time, and it makes this neighborhood one of the most walkable in the entire
state. With the city's investments to update 900 East through this neighborhood this year, its
clear that the prioritizing of walkability/bikeability of the community is a priority, which I
applaud.
Having looked at the back of the Snelgrove factory out my front window for many years, I see
the potential for the site, and welcome the change to the neighborhood with housing and the
new liquor store.
I have participated as a neighborhood resident in the discussions with the Sugar House Land
Use committee with the developer, and have seen many of the community's suggestions
integrated into site plan changes and improvements. I think the addition of walking routes
through the block go a long way to improving access to all, and chopping up a large block in
the neighborhood. From my experience, the development team is acting in good faith to bring
a well-designed and context sensitive project to an urban neighborhood, encouraging more
residents to move to a neighborhood where they can walk to many destinations, and live a less
car-centric life. With easy access to bus, train, bike, and walking, from my experience this is
one of the most liveable neighborhoods in the city.
I certainly wish there was more space along 2100 South in the project for retail/services space,
rather than just the building's gym and leasing office. No doubt there are other retailers or
service providers who would be more than interested in space next door to one of the city's
few liquor stores. I appreciate the inclusion of public art in the project, and look forward to
seeing it come together.
Thank you for the city's attention to this neighborhood. I know you hear a lot of resistance to
new projects in Sugar House, but that is certainly not a unanimous opinion.
Mark Morris, PLA, LEED™AP, ASLA
VODA Landscape + Planning
159 West Broadway #200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Phone (385)429-2858
Email mark@vodaplan.com
Web www.vodaplan.com
From:Landon Clark
To:Traughber, Lex; Anderson, John
Subject:(EXTERNAL)
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:01:21 PM
Hi Lex or John,
My name is Landon Clark with the Sugar House Community Council.
I won't be able to make the planning commission meeting tonight but wanted to send a
paragraph from the SHCC for you to read tonight to the planning commission.
Speaking on behalf of the Sugar House Community Council we would like to talk about the
level of outreach this developer has done with our community. They have presented at our
general community council meeting a couple of times, our Land Use and Zoning a couple of
times and have met with a group of us countless times. Their level of community engagement
has been outstanding. For the most part we have had a very positive response throughout the
community. There is a lot of discussion about bringing more affordable housing to Sugar
House. When this group had the idea of including work force housing in exchange for an
extra floor of height the response was overwhelming positive, even George Chapman gave a
thumbs up.
Thank you
Landon Clark
Sugar House Community Council Chair
GO UTES!
From:Anderson, John
To:Della Rae Riker
Cc:Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) : 850 & 870 E. 2100 South Rezone
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 4:31:45 PM
Thanks for the additional comments. I will make sure that the commission receives them.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Della Rae Riker
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 4:27 PM
To: Anderson, John <John.Anderson@slcgov.com>
Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) : 850 & 870 E. 2100 South Rezone
John,
Thank you for your quick response and the meeting information.
The only additional comments I have are that 2100 S is already stressed with traffic. Many of the
roads in Sugarhouse are heavily trafficked and in need of repair as a result. We haven't even seen
the traffic impact from the occupation of the new apartments between McClelland and Highland
Drive. Also, for neighbors who love the cozy feel of their Sugarhouse street having to look at a 60'
building will have an emotional impact. In a time when people's lives have been drastically impacted
by COVID now seems the time to maintain the integrity of our community as much as possible.
Again, many thanks,
Della Rae
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:32 PM Anderson, John <John.Anderson@slcgov.com> wrote:
Della Rae,
Good afternoon, your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning
Commission before tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there are
instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC02.24.2021
agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to
questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the
counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which
may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or
preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Della Rae Riker
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:13 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) : 850 & 870 E. 2100 South Rezone
Please don't. Sugarhouse is becoming much too crowded and losing the community charm. Keep
it as small as possible.
--
Della Rae Riker
--
Della Rae Riker
raeriker@gmail.com
801-891-3238
From:Anderson, John
To:Della Rae Riker; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Rankins, Marlene; Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) : 850 & 870 E. 2100 South Rezone
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:32:10 PM
Della Rae,
Good afternoon, your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning
Commission before tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there
are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Della Rae Riker
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:13 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) : 850 & 870 E. 2100 South Rezone
Please don't. Sugarhouse is becoming much too crowded and losing the community charm. Keep it
as small as possible.
--
Della Rae Riker
From:Robinson, Molly
To:Stephanie Christian; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) 21st south snelgrove
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 5:33:50 PM
Thanks, Stephanie. We will read your comments into the record during the public hearing.
MOLLY O'NEILL ROBINSON, AICP
Planning Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7261
CEL 385-226-8656
EML MOLLY.ROBINSON@SLCGOV.COM
WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
WWW.OURNEIGHBORHOODSCAN.COM
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response
to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do
so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie Christian
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 5:31 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) 21st south snelgrove
I am writing to express my opposition to the reasoning proposal on 21st south near the old snelgroves. Adding the
proposed amount of housing to that area of 21st south will create an unsustainable amount of congestion. The
congestion is already an issue that needs to be addressed. I am not opposed to dense housing however the additional
traffic and needs need to be addressed more thoroughly than what is proposed.
-Stephanie Christian
Sent from my iPhone
From:Anderson, John
To:David Fernandez; Planning Public Comments
Cc:"Judi Short"; Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Deny the Sugar Town Zoning Change
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:27:23 AM
David,
Your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning Commission at
tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there are instructions on
how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: David Fernandez
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:13 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Cc: 'Judi Short'
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Deny the Sugar Town Zoning Change
I call for the Salt Lake Planning Commission to deny the request for the change of zoning and
prevent the development of the apartment complex known as “Sugar Town” to proceed.
Furthermore, I would call for the Salt Lake Planning Commission, the Salt Lake City Council and the
Mayor to find the courage to move heaven and earth to re-open the Snelgrove factory as a local
boutique ice cream parlor. I ask this not because it is easy, but because it is hard.
Regards,
David Fernandez
From:Robinson, Molly
To:Hollie Brown; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) No more condos in Sugarhouse!!
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 5:54:42 PM
Thank you for your comments, Hollie. We will read your comments into the record during the public hearing
tonight.
MOLLY O'NEILL ROBINSON, AICP
Planning Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7261
CEL 385-226-8656
EML MOLLY.ROBINSON@SLCGOV.COM
WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
WWW.OURNEIGHBORHOODSCAN.COM
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response
to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do
so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hollie Brown
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 5:49 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) No more condos in Sugarhouse!!
The proposed plan for the old Snelgrove site is a bad idea. Sugarhouse is getting so built out and the charm that once
made this neighborhood so desirable is all but gone. Traffic is insane especially on 2100 s from 700 e to 1300 e. The
roads aren’t designed for the drastic increase in traffic. I have lived in Sugarhouse for 48 years and have watched it
deteriorate. Cramming another condo into the area only benefits the developers because it certainly isn’t benefiting
residents. When will enough be enough? How about focusing on open spaces and developing unique features that
will add to the community instead of another chain restaurant or retail store that will be out of business in six
months? Instead of telling taxpayers of proposed building, how about asking area residents what we’d like to see? I
guarantee no one will say more condos and retail.
Thank you,
Hollie Brown
From:Anderson, John
To:Carling Mars; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Opposing luxury redevelopment of area near Snelgrove
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:35:31 AM
Carling,
Good morning, I’m assuming that you’re referencing the proposed zoning changes at the
former Snelgrove ice cream plat which is located at 850 E. 2100 S. That project would not
remove any existing housing as currently proposed. It would only remove the existing
nonconforming industrial site. You can learn more about the project here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/00906.00925StaffRep
ort.pdf I hope this is helpful. If you have additional questions please let me know.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Carling Mars
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:11 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Opposing luxury redevelopment of area near Snelgrove
Hello!
I am opposed to getting rid of the somewhat affordable options around 2100 S and 800 E in the
interest of building a luxury apartment building. We have an affordable housing crisis in SLC and we
need to be building more housing that is accessible to people making minimum wage or even
amounts much higher than minimum wage, as these people are being priced out of many
neighborhoods by luxury developments that demolish existing more affordable housing. All new
housing developments should be required to include subsidized housing for low income people. We
are not going to fix the homelessness crisis by erecting luxury apartments. We need more affordable
housing, not less.
Best,
Carling Mars
SLC resident
From:Anderson, John
To:The Greenleighs; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Request to speak at hearing Petitions PLNPCM2020-oo906 & 00925
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:53:08 AM
Thomas,
In order to participate in tonight’s meeting there are instructions on how to connect on the
meeting’s agenda found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf If for some reason you are unable to connect to tonight’s meeting,
please send an email to this address, and I can read your comments aloud to the
commission. Please let me know if you have any questions.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: The Greenleighs
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:48 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Request to speak at hearing Petitions PLNPCM2020-oo906 & 00925
I would like to speak briefly at tonight's meeting of the Planning Commission regarding two concerns we
have as a close neighbor to the proposed SugarTown project.
1) The proposed 2019-style modernistic design conflicts with the 1920's -1950's look of the surrounding
neighborhood, the look that made Sugarhouse a desirable location for the development in the first place.
2) Due to the proximity of the development to our homes (18 feet), and the age of much of the building
being demolished, we request that a specific plan be added to the proposal to protect the neighbors
from toxic dust and debris, and that there be a specific plan for noise mitigation during demolition and
construction.
Thank you for this opportunity.
Thomas Greenleigh
From:Anderson, John
To:Devin; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Re-zoning
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 11:53:45 AM
Devin,
Your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning Commission at tonight’s meeting. I do
also want you to know that Salt Lake City leaders and staff are certainly aware of the current housing affordability
crisis and we are working hard looking for solutions to mitigate a significant problem. If you would like to
participate in the meeting this evening there are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be
found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC02.24.2021agenda.pdf
Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response
to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do
so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
-----Original Message-----
From: Devin
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 11:19 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Re-zoning
Hello,
I am writing today to as you to oppose the snelgrove re-zone. Honestly, as a long time resident of SLC I find it
beyond troubling how much new development has pushed lower income people out of the city. We’ve seen such a
large amount of new development in the last 5-10 years. Each time a building goes up, seeing that a studio
apartment is over $1200, 1br $1300+ and 2 br $1500+ is scary. Doing this with even $15/hr is a stretch. It’s making
renting anything else difficult as well with the prices being driven up by these luxury buildings.
When you look at the generally accepted 50/20/30 plan for budgeting it’s not in your citizens’ interest to allow this
to continue. That rule states 50% of income should go to your essentials (food, transport, housing, utilities). A
$15/hr worker brings in ~$2400 a month leaving $1200 for the necessities. Rent alone just broke that so now your
other life expenses like food and utilities are taking away from what should be saved income. You’d need two
people at that income level to make it possible. At minimum wage... forget it. A $1600/mo income would take 2
people just to afford a studio.
So, I beg of you, please stop this and any other re-zones. Stop giving breaks to these high cost apartments. In fact,
pressure the existing ones to offer a higher percentage of not just low income but also affordable rates. Many people
fall in the middle that are left out because they can’t afford market rate but make to much to qualify as low income.
Lining the city’s pockets by bringing out of state residents in can’t be more important than supporting existing
residents and adding to our homeless population.
Thank you,
Devin O'Donnell
From:Anderson, John
To:Angie Witzel; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Development
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:31:09 AM
Angie,
Your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning Commission at tonight’s meeting. If you
would like to participate in the meeting there are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be
found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC02.24.2021agenda.pdf
Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response
to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do
so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
-----Original Message-----
From: Angie Witzel
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:37 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Development
I am very concerned about the proposed 60 Unit housing and business development on the former Snelgrove site.
The Sugar House area does not have the infrastructure to support the existing multi unit homes and businesses.
I drive on dilapidated roads in desperate need of repair every day. The traffic in Sugarhouse is terrible as most roads
are one lane with the exception of 21st South.
Until major improvements in infrastructure are made, this development should not move forward. As much as the
planning community thinks Sugar House is a walking community, it is not.
Thank You
Angie Witzel
From:Anderson, John
To:Kim Lee; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Rankins, Marlene; Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Lot
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:04:46 PM
Kim,
Good afternoon, your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning Commission before
tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there are instructions on how to do so on the
meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC02.24.2021agenda.pdf
Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response
to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do
so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Lee
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:07 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Lot
Please do allow plans for more condos or apartments in the sugarhouse area. It is ruining what has been a great
place to live and shop. There is not enough parking as is. And the traffic patterns are horrendous at certain hours of
the day! Please rethink this!.
thanks,
From:Anderson, John
To:Kim Kendall; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Property
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:29:24 AM
Kim,
Your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning Commission at
tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there are instructions on
how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Kim Kendall
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 7:38 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Property
This plan to rezone the Snelgrove property for yet MORE high density housing and retail is a
disaster!! Please reconsider and understand that 2100 S. is a main thorough fair, the existing
infostructure is absolutely not capable of supporting what you are planning. Please be conscious of
the people and businesses that fit into current infostructure. 2100 S. from 2300 East west to State
street has already become more dangerous for drivers and pedestrians, crime has skyrocketed and it
is absolutely ridiculous to think that it can support the traffic that comes with additional housing and
retail.
Regards,
Kim Kendall
From:Anderson, John
To:Kristin Kraus; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove property
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:15:06 AM
Kristin,
Good morning, your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning
Commission before tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there
are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Kristin Kraus
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:00 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove property
I'm very disappointed to read about the plans to convert the former Snelgrove ice cream
property to another mixed use facility with shops and living units of up to 60 feet. Aren't
there enough of those in Sugarhouse? I feel like we are turning into NYC, which is not a
good thing!
The great thing about Sugarhouse used to be that it wasn't suburbia with the same stores
and fast food restaurants as everywhere else. There were quaint shops and cute buildings.
This is what we want for our neighborhood, NOT more rezoned ridiculousness.
Sincerely,
Kristin Kraus
84106
From:Robinson, Molly
To:Scott Sartor; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Property Proposal
Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 2:26:56 PM
Mr. Sartor,
Thank you for your comment. The Planning Commission made a positive recommendation
to the City Council regarding the matter at their meeting last Wednesday, February 24th.
We will forward your comment in our packet to the City Council. You will have future
opportunities to give comment as the City Council will also hold a public hearing prior to
making a decision to approve or deny the request.
Thanks,
Molly
MOLLY O'NEILL ROBINSON, AICP
Planning Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7261
CEL 385-226-8656
EML MOLLY.ROBINSON@SLCGOV.COM
WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
WWW.OURNEIGHBORHOODSCAN.COM
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
From: Scott Sartor
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 4:54 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove Property Proposal
To Whom it May Concern,
I am against any more apartments or condos in this area. Traffic is already at capacity on 2100
South from 700 East to 1300 East. Please go drive and walk around the block there before you do
anything that involves more condos/ affordable housing!
Thanks very much,
Scott Sartor
From:Anderson, John
To:Ann Haynes; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Traughber, Lex; Rankins, Marlene
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove property
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:28:42 AM
Ann,
Your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning Commission at tonight’s meeting. If you
would like to participate in the meeting there are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be
found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC02.24.2021agenda.pdf
Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as
accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to
application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response
to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do
so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Haynes
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:57 AM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove property
To whom it may concern,
Please do not change the zoning of the snelgrove parcel. Sugarhouse, and 2100 south, do not need more traffic and
tall buildings. Keep the corridor designation please! We are just overwhelmed with the model of business on the
bottom floor and apartments above.
Ann Haynes
Sent from my iPhone
From:Anderson, John
To:devwright@gmail.com; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Rankins, Marlene; Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove redevelopment
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:00:41 PM
Devin,
Good afternoon, your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning
Commission before tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there
are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: devwright@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:31 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove redevelopment
Hello,
I want to state my support for the redevelopment of the Snelgrove property in Sugarhouse. I think
that a mixed use development would be a perfect addition to this neighborhood and would replace
an unsightly industrial building. Salt Lake City needs more density so an additional floor and
extension to 60” height is reasonable.
Thank you for your attention,
Devin Wright
From:Anderson, John
To:Lucy Houser; Planning Public Comments
Cc:Rankins, Marlene; Traughber, Lex
Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove rezone
Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:01:42 PM
Lucy,
Good afternoon, your comments are appreciated and they will be shared with the Planning
Commission before tonight’s meeting. If you would like to participate in the meeting there
are instructions on how to do so on the meeting’s agenda that can be found here:
http://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Planning%20Commission/2021/02.%20February/PC0
2.24.2021agenda.pdf Please let me know if you have additional comments to share.
JOHN ANDERSON
Manager
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-7214
CEL 385-226-6479
EMAIL john.anderson@slcgov.com
www.SLC.GOV/PLANNING
www.ourneighborhoodscan.com
"Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights."
From: Lucy Houser
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:54 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Snelgrove rezone
Hello,
I oppose the rezoning of the Snelgrove property.
I live right around the corner at 1982 South 800 East. The traffic is already terrible on 2100 South,
and that enormous apartment building where Granite Furniture used to be next to Fairmont Park
hasn't even opened yet. Adding yet another large apartment building to Sugar House will very
negatively affect the traffic situation.
In addition, a 60' building is simply too high. It will shadow and overlook the neighborhood, affecting
our access to natural light and will impinge on our privacy.
Please do not give permission to the developers to go ahead with this project as it is currently
planned. Send them back to the drawing board.
Lucy Houser
I oppose
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: June 15, 2021
RE: Rezone& Master Plan Amendment
810 East 800 South R-2 to CB
PLNPCM2020-00740 &
PLNPCM2020-00741
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing June 15, 2021
Set Date: June 15, 2021
Public Hearing: July 13, 2021
Potential Action: July 20, 2021
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed on a proposal to rezone property located at approximately 810 East 800 South.
from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) and amend the Central
Community Future Land Use Map from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial.
The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the Council.
The property is currently vacant. The city’s permit card files show that a single-family home was
demolished in 1989. The applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a two-story building that
would have commercial space on the first floor, residential units on the second floor, and parking located to
the rear.
Page | 2
Vicinity Map
(From Attachment A, Planning Commission Staff Report)
Page | 3
Zoning Map
Page 2 of the Transmittal Letter
Page | 4
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Planning Commission Staff Report
Pages 3-5 of the Planning Commission staff report identify three main issues for review. A short
description of each issue and the finding is provided below for reference. Please see the Planning
Commission staff report for full analysis.
Issue 1: Compatibility with adopted planning documents
This section reviewed the proposal for compatibility with existing master plans such as the East Central
Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake.
•The preliminary plans for a mixed-use development require the zoning map and master plan
amendments.
•The CB zoning district and Community Commercial land use designation are consistent with the
proposed development. They are also consistent with the zoning and land use on the adjacent
Smith’s property.
•There is a commercial use on the adjacent Smith’s property and on the corner of 800 East and 800
South. As such, the proposed amendments are appropriate for the context and the neighborhood.
•The current zoning and small size of the parcel limits the property to a single-family residence.
•The proposed master plan amendment and zoning map amendment are also compatible with the
citywide Plan Salt Lake in that it would provide a mix of uses, redevelopment of a vacant property,
and additional commercial space and residential units in the central area of the city.
Issue 2: Zoning compatibility with adjacent properties
•The existing zone, R-2, generally permits single- and two-family residential properties.
•The CB zone, consistent with the Smith’s property to the east, allows for a variety of commercial
uses and multifamily development.
•The anticipated use of the site with commercial on the first floor and residential on the second floor
would serve as a transition from adjacent higher intensity uses and would be compatible with the
commercial development to the east and the mix of small scale commercial and residential
development to the west.
Issue 3: Existing zoning limitations and proposed zone
•The subject property is currently zoned R-2, which allows for single-family and two-family
dwellings.
o Two-family dwellings require a minimum of 8,000 square feet, which is approximately
1,200 square feet larger than this parcel.
o With this requirement, the property is generally limited to single-family uses. It has been
vacant since the previous residence was demolished in 1989,
Zoning District Comparison
Page | 5
R-2
(Existing)
CB
(Proposed)
Minimum Lot Area
Single-family detached dwellings
Two-family dwellings
5,000 sq. ft.
8,000 square feet
None
Max Height
28 ft. to the ridge or the
average of the block face;
20 ft. for flat roofs
30 ft.
Front Yard
Average of
block face or
20 ft.
None
required
Rear Yard
25% of lot depth not less
than 15 ft., need not be
more than 25’
10 ft.
Interior Side Yard
4 ft. on one or
10 ft. on the
other
None
required
Max Building Coverage 40%NA
Landscape Yard NA Front yard, if
provided
Buffer yard NA 7 ft. next to
residential
Allowed Uses Comparison
The transmittal letter notes the Planning Commission discussed recommending that the City Council limit
the site to specific uses, but, ultimately, did not make a recommendation on use of the site.
The CB allows many more commercial uses than the R-2. Pages 22 – 24 of the Planning Commission staff
report includes a comparison of the allowed uses in the R2 and CB zoning districts.
Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments –
PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
810 East 800 South
Request:
To rezone the
parcel from R-2 to
CB and amend the
master plan future
land use map
designation from
Low Density
Residential to
Community
Commercial.
Existing Zoning
-Existing zoning is R-2
-Proposed zoning is CB
Conceptual Proposal
Key Considerations
Compatibility with Master Plans
-Requires Master Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial
-Adjacent property is Community Commercial
-Proposal is consistent with Plan Salt Lake and Central Community Master Plan
Zoning Compatibility
-Property is currently vacant
-Residence on site demolished in 1989
-Existing R-2 zoning and approximately 6,850 sq. ft. size of parcel limits current use to a single-family home
-Proposed CB zoning consistent with property to the east
Existing Zoning Limitations and Proposed Zone
-Small, approximately 6,850 sq. ft. property
-Limited to a single-family home on property; vacant since 1989
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 28, 2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director Department of Community & Neighborhoods
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
810 East 800 South
STAFF CONTACT: Sara Javoronok, AICP, Senior Planner
(385) 226-4448, sara.javoronok@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council amend the zoning map and master plan as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The applicant, Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group, on
behalf of the property owner, 810 E Holdings LLC, is requesting Master Plan and Zoning Map
amendments for an approximately 0.15 acre (6,850 sq. ft.) property located at approximately 810
East 800 South. The applicant is requesting a Master Plan amendment to change the Central
Community Future Land Use Map designation from Low Density Residential to Community
Commercial. The applicant is also requesting a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning of
the parcel from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business). The
applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a two-story building that would have
commercial space on the first floor, residential units on the second floor, and parking located to
the rear.
The property is approximately 0.15 acres (6,850 sq. ft.) and is zoned R-2. The applicant is
requesting a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning of the parcel to CB. The Central
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 445 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145487, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5487 TEL 801.535.7712 FAX 801.535.6269
5/4/2021
5/5/2021
Community Master Plan was adopted in 2005 and the Future Land Use Map designates this area
as Low Density Residential. The zoning map amendment to CB requires a change in the land use
designation to Community Commercial. The property is currently vacant. The city’s permit card
files show that a single-family home was demolished in 1989.
Map showing the area proposed for rezoning outlined in yellow with
existing adjacent zoning identified
PUBLIC PROCESS:
Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to the East Central and East
Liberty Park Community Councils on October 14, 2020. The community council was given 45
days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed
zoning amendment.
The East Liberty Park Community Council held a Zoom meeting on October 22, 2020 that the
applicant, developer, and staff attended. Phil Winston presented the project and also stated the
applicant was willing to enter into a development agreement prohibiting a restaurant or bar.
Comments were generally supportive of the proposal and neighbors have indicated that they
were against a restaurant or bar.
The Community Council submitted a letter of support (attached) for the project with a
development agreement.
Planning Commission Meeting: On January 13, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. One citizen provided testimony in
support of the request. One citizen spoke in opposition to the request because of the wide range
of uses permitted in CB. A neighbor provided an email comment in support of the request. The
Commission discussed recommending that the City Council limit the site to specific uses, but,
ultimately, did not make a recommendation on use of the site. The Commission voted
unanimously to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council for the rezone and
master plan amendment, consistent with the staff recommendation.
EXHIBITS:
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Planning Commission
A) Mailing Notice
B) Staff Report
C) Agenda/Minutes/Newspaper Notice
4. Public Comment
5. Original Petition
6. Mailing List
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2021
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 810 East 800 South
Street to rezone the parcel from R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential to CB Community
Business District and amending the Central Community Future Land Use Map)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 810
East 800 South Street to rezone the parcel from R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District
to CB Community Business District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2020-00740 and
amending the Central Community Future Land Use Map pursuant to petition number
PLNPCM2020-00741.
WHEREAS, Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group submitted an application to
rezone a parcel of property located at 810 East 800 South Street to rezone the parcel from R-2
Single- and Two-Family Residential District to CB Community Business District pursuant to
petition number PLNPCM2020-00740 and amending the Central Community Future Land Use
Map with respect to the property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial
pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2020-00741; and
WHEREAS, at its January 13, 2021 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt
Lake City Council on said applications; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the city council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the parcel located at 810 East 800 South Street (Tax ID No. 16-
2
08-176-024-0000), which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is
rezoned from R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District to CB Community Business
District.
SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Master Plan. The Future Land Use
Map of the Central Community Master Plan shall be and hereby is amended to change the future
land use designation of the property identified in Exhibit “A” from Low Density Residential to
Community Commercial.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ____________, 2021.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2021
Published: ______________.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: _________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney
April 20, 2021
3
Exhibit “A”
Legal description of the property parcel
Tax ID No. 16-08-176-024-0000
BEG 5 RDS E FR NW COR LOT 5, BLK 2, PLAT B, SLC SUR; E 5 RDS; S 5 RDS; W 5 RDS;
N 5 RDS TO BEG.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Project Chronology
2. Notice of City Council Hearing
3. Planning Commission – January 13, 2021 Public Hearing
A. Mailing Notice
B. Staff Report
C. Agenda/Minutes/Newspaper Notice
4. Public Comment
5. Original Petition
6. Mailing List
1. CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petitions: PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
September 23, 2020 Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group submits application for
rezone and master plan amendment of the property at 810 East 800
South.
October 8, 2020 Petitions PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741
assigned to Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner, for staff analysis and
processing.
October 14, 2020 Email sent to Recognized Community Organizations (East Central
and East Liberty Park Community Councils) informing them of the
petition.
October 22, 2020 Proposal discussed at East Liberty Park Community Council Zoom
meeting
December 29, 2020 Sign posted on property.
December 29, 2020 Planning Commission hearing notices posted on City and State
websites and Planning Division listserv. Notices also mailed out to
property owners/residents. A newspaper notice was also requested
to be printed as required for master plan amendments.
January 13, 2021 Planning Commission reviewed the petition and held a public
hearing. The commission voted unanimously to send a positive
recommendation to the City Council.
January 15, 2021 Ordinance review requested from City Attorney’s office.
2. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2020-00740 Zoning Map
Amendment and PLNPCM2020-00741 Master Plan Amendment, requests by Stanford Bell of
Altus Development Group, on behalf of the property owner, to amend the zoning map for the
property located at approximately 810 East 800 South. The proposal would rezone the property
from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) pursuant to petition
PLNPCM2020-00740 and amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map with respect to
the property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial pursuant to petition
number PLNCPM2020-00741. The applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a two-
story building that would have commercial space on the first floor, residential units on the second
floor, and parking located to the rear. The property is in Council District 5, represented by Darin
Mano.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE: Date #1 and Date #2
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location.
**This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency
Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our
website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during
the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at
(801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received
through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal, please call Sara Javoronok at 385-226-4448
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at
sara.javoronok@slcgov.com. You may review the file online at
https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/citizen, by selecting the Planning tab, and entering the petition
numbers PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours
in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days
in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
A. Mailing Notice
December 29, 2020
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
B. Staff Report
January 13, 2021
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
Staff Report
To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission
From: Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner, 801-535-7625
Date: January 13, 2021
Re: PLNPCM2020-00740 and PLNPCM2020-00741 – 810 East 800 South
Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 810 East 800 South
PARCEL ID: 16-08-176-024-0000
MASTER PLAN: Central Community
ZONING DISTRICT: R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential)
REQUEST: The applicant, Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group, on behalf of the property
owner, 810 E Holdings LLC, is requesting Master Plan and Zoning Map amendments for
an approximately 0.15 acre (6,850 sq. ft.) property located at approximately 810 East 800
South. The applicant is requesting a Master Plan amendment to change the Central
Community Future Land Use Map designation from Low Density Residential to
Community Commercial. The applicant is also requesting a Zoning Map amendment to
change the zoning of the parcel from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB
(Community Business). The applicant submitted preliminary development plans for a
two-story building that would have commercial space on the first floor, residential units
on the second floor, and parking located to the rear.
RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information in this staff report, Planning Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for
the proposed master plan and zoning map amendments.
ATTACHMENTS:
A.Vicinity Map
B.Site Photographs
C.Additional Applicant Information
D.Existing Conditions & Development Standards
E.Analysis of Standards
F.Public Process & Comments
G.Department Review Comments
1
BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The property is approximately 0.15 acres (6,850 sq. ft.) and is zoned R-2. The applicant is requesting a
Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning of the parcel to CB. The Central Community Master
Plan was adopted in 2005 and the Future Land Use Map designates this area as Low Density
Residential. The zoning map amendment to CB requires a change in the land use designation to
Community Commercial. The property is currently vacant. The city’s permit card files show that a
single-family home was demolished in 1989. Per the applicant, this was due to a fire. The residence is
shown on the 1898 Sanborn maps, the first to cover this area, and is shown as two stories with brick on
the first floor. The 1950 Sanborn maps also show the residence on the site (and approximately 19
residences and an 11-unit apartment building on the Smith’s site).
Map showing the area proposed for rezoning outlined in yellow with
existing adjacent zoning identified
2
KEY ISSUES:
The key issues listed below have been identified through the analysis of the project, community input,
and department review comments.
Issue 1: Compatibility with adopted planning documents
The proposal is consistent with the Central Community Master Plan and Plan Salt Lake. The Central
Community Master Plan identifies this property as Low Density Residential (5-10 dwelling
units/acre). The property is currently vacant and located to the west of a Smith’s grocery store and is
to the east of a duplex zoned R-2. Slightly further to the east on the corner of 800 East and 800 South
is a Small Neighborhood Business (SNB) zoned parcel. Residential properties are located to the north.
The preliminary plans for a mixed-use development require the zoning map and master plan
amendments. The CB zoning district and Community Commercial land use designation are consistent
with the proposed development. They are also consistent with the zoning and land use on the adjacent
Smith’s property. While a change from the existing designations, it is appropriate for the site and the
neighborhood. The property has been vacant since 1989. There is a commercial use on the adjacent
Smith’s property and on the corner of 800 East and 800 South (Vis). As such, the proposed
amendments are appropriate for the context and the neighborhood.
Several goals and criteria in the Central Community Master Plan are applicable to this project. The
plan’s Vision for the Future identifies several applicable criteria among four goals:
Livable communities and neighborhoods
• A variety of residential land use supports all types of housing and the affordability of the housing
stock.
• The appropriate transition of multi-family housing with mixed land uses in designated areas
supports sustainable development within the community.
Vital and sustainable commerce
• Increased pedestrian accessibility and cultural activities encourage more housing that supports
the employment center of the downtown area.
• An enhanced built environment encourages employees to work and live in the Central
Community and supports the creation of smaller locally owned businesses.
Unique and active places
• New places where people can gather, meet, socialize, and recreate are created using design
excellence and shared resources.
• Existing destination centers and gathering places are enhanced through urban design
recommendations.
Pedestrian mobility and accessibility
• Children, senior adults, and those with disabilities can access destination points without being
threatened by vehicular movement.
• Improved pedestrian movement along arterials and collectors ensures pedestrian safety.
The proposed rezoning and master plan amendment would allow for a future development that could
include commercial and residential uses, including the development proposed in the preliminary plans
for a building with a first-floor commercial use and second floor residential. The property is in a
location that is accessible to pedestrians and near other commercial and residential uses.
Specific to the East Central North Neighborhood Planning Area, the following issues apply:
• Ensure that commercial development is compatible with any adjacent residential land uses
• Reduce excessive density potential, stabilize the neighborhood, and conserve the neighborhood’s
residential character.
• Improve zoning enforcement, including illegal conversion to apartments, yard cleanup, “slum
lords,” etc.
3
The current zoning and small size of the parcel limits the property to a single-family residence. This is
likely why it remains vacant. While a single-family residence was its historic use, the previous residence
on the property was demolished 30 years ago and it has not been redeveloped in the past 30 years. In
addition, while not recent, the construction of the Smith’s and the change to the character of the
neighborhood with its development makes the proposed commercial zoning, change in the land use
designation, and the preliminary proposal for a mixed-use development appropriate for the site.
The proposed master plan amendment and zoning map amendment are also compatible with the
citywide Plan Salt Lake. Consistent with Plan Salt Lake, the proposal will provide a mix of uses,
redevelopment of a vacant property, and additional commercial space and residential units in the
central area of the city. The plan identifies several initiatives that the proposed rezoning helps to
implement. In the Growth Chapter, the following apply:
1.Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and
transportation corridors.
2.Encourage a mix of land uses.
3.Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land.
The proposed rezoning is located on 800 South, one block north of the 900 South “Funding our Future”
frequent service transit route and one block west of the 900 East Route 209. As stated above, the site
is currently vacant, and the proposed rezoning and master plan amendment are consistent with the use
to the east and, given the small nature of the property, would serve as a transition to the residential and
small neighborhood business uses to the west.
While a residential use would not be required, the applicant submitted a preliminary proposal that
included housing units. In this case, two initiatives in the Housing Chapter apply as well:
2.Increase the number of medium density housing types and options.
4.Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the
potential to be people-oriented.
5.Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate.
The site is located in close proximity to existing infrastructure, including frequent service transit routes.
The preliminary proposal for commercial and residential would provide additional space for small
businesses and additional residential units in the neighborhood.
Issue 2: Zoning compatibility with adjacent properties
As detailed in Attachment A – Vicinity Maps and Attachment D – Existing Conditions and
Development Standards, the surrounding properties are zoned CB and R-2. The R-2 zone generally
permits single- and two-family residential properties. The CB zone, consistent with the Smith’s
property to the east, allows for a variety of commercial uses and multifamily development. Given these
standards, the anticipated use of the site with commercial on the first floor and residential on the
second floor would serve as a transition from adjacent higher intensity uses and would be compatible
with the commercial development to the east and the mix of small scale commercial and residential
development to the west.
Issue 3: Existing zoning limitations and proposed zone
The subject property is currently zoned R-2, which allows for single-family and two-family dwellings.
However, two-family dwellings require a minimum of 8,000 square feet, which is approximately 1,200
square feet larger than this parcel. With this requirement, the property is generally limited to single-
family uses. It has been vacant since the previous residence was demolished in 1989, so this reuse
seems unlikely. This is detailed in Attachment D – Existing Conditions and Development Standards.
As previously stated, the proposed CB zoning district is consistent with the zoning of the Smith’s
property to the east. Grocery stores are frequently zoned CB, which is intended to provide for the close
4
integration of moderately sized commercial areas with adjacent residential neighborhoods. It allows
for an additional 5’ of building height compared to the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) and SNB
zoning districts, which could allow for a taller first floor ceiling height that often benefits commercial
uses and is consistent with the zoning to the east. The maximum height in CB at 30’ is 2’ greater than
the 28’ permitted for a single-family home with a pitched roof in the R-2 zoning district. CB allows for
a wider variety of uses compared to SNB. The uses in CB are similar to CN and many of the additional
uses permitted in CB, such as an assisted living facility, gas station, or hotel are likely to be developed
on larger parcels. This property is adjacent to an existing CB zoned property and the uses, height, and
design standards related to glass and blank wall length as well as the maximum 30’ height are
appropriate for the site.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed master plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial and
the proposed zoning map amendment from R-2 to CB would allow for a variety of commercial uses and
multifamily residential on the site. Currently, the property is vacant since a historically single-family
residence was demolished in 1989. Generally, due to the small size of the site, development of a greater
intensity than a single-family residence is not permitted due to lot area restrictions. The proposed CB
zoning district is located on the Smith’s property to the east and a rezoning of this small parcel to CB
would serve as a transition to the R-2 and SNB zoned properties near the subject property.
The East Liberty Park Community Council discussed the proposed rezoning at their October meeting
and submitted a letter in support of the proposal. At the meeting, there were questions about the
proposed use, including whether a restaurant or bar would be permitted and a potential development
agreement with a restriction on these uses. In addition, staff has received three emails in support of
the proposal (Attachment F).
NEXT STEPS:
The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their
consideration as part of the final decision on this petition. If ultimately approved, the applicant may
proceed with the submission of plans to redevelop the site. If ultimately denied, the applicant would be
able to construct a single-family home on the property.
ATTACHMENT A: VICINITY MAP
6
Noble Pl
80
0
E
900 S
Chase Ave
800 S
900 S
800 S
Me
n
d
o
n
C
t
800 S
900 S
80
0
E
80
0
E
Wi
n
d
s
o
r
S
t
731
758 764 768 718
726
732
738
742
764
717 816 826 840
721
725
729
739
747
749
753
757
761
765
724
726
730
736
744
750
754
760
762
785 819
823
831 833
719 854 856
723
725
729
733
737
743
751
753
755
759
761
763
845 851 861
726
732
746
750
760
768
772
780
752
756
764
768
774 802
839
847
851
853855857859
863
814
818
824
828
832
836
844
848
854
751
753
763
765 775 777
859
801
809
813
817
823
829
847
832
829
825
825
810
835
833
834
834
819 841 865 870859
876
80
0
E
Li
n
c
o
l
n
S
t
Lowell Ave
Belmont Ave
Eg
l
i
C
t
Wi
n
d
s
o
r
S
t
La
k
e
S
t
Sego Ave
700 S
900 S
90
0
E
800 S
70
0
E
¯Salt Lake City Planning Division, 10/12/2020
Legend
Subject Property
Parcels
Vicinity Map
0 80 160 240 32040
Feet7
ATTACHMENT B: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
View of the property.
View of the property, the accessory structure on the property to the west, and the back of the commercial
building on the corner of 800 S and 800 E.
8
View of Smith’s property to the east.
View of east/front façade of commercial property at 800 S and 800 E.
9
View of adjacent duplex to the east – 800 E/front facade.
View of the front/west façade (800 E) of the property to the south of the subject property.
10
View from the site looking across 800 S
11
ATTACHMENT C: ADDITIONAL APPLICANT
INFORMATION
12
Updated 7/1/
Master Plan Amendment
Amend the text of the Master Plan Amend the Land Use Map
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By: Date Received: Project #:
Name of Master Plan Amendment:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Address of Subject Property (or Area):
Name of Applicant: Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant:Cell/Fax:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner:Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
Planners are available for consultation prior to submitting this application. Please call (801) 535-7700 if
you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application.
REQUIRED FEE
Filing fee of $ plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre.
$100 for newspaper notice.
Plus additional fee for mailed public notices.
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent: Date:
13
Updated 7/1/
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
e
w
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Project Description (please attach additional sheets.)
Describe the proposed master plan amendment.
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
Declare why the present master plan requires amending.
Is the request amending the Land Use Map?
If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed.
Is the request amending the text of the master plan?
If so, please include exact language to be changed.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Mailing Address: Planning Counter
PO Box 145471
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
In Person: Planning Counter
451 South State Street, Room 215
Telephone: (801) 535-7700
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I
understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the
submittal package.
14
Updated 7/1/
Zoning Amendment
Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance Amend the Zoning Map
OFFICE USE ONLY
Received By: Date Received: Project #:
Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Address of Subject Property (or Area):
Name of Applicant: Phone:
Address of Applicant:
E-mail of Applicant:Cell/Fax:
Owner Contractor Architect Other:
Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant):
E-mail of Property Owner:Phone:
Please note that additional information may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate
information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and
made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public
review by any interested party.
AVAILABLE CONSULTATION
If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City
Planning Counter at (801) 535-7700 prior to submitting the application.
REQUIRED FEE
iling fee of $plus $121 per acre in excess of one acre
for newspaper notice.
Plus additional fee for mailed public notices.
SIGNATURE
If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required.
Signature of Owner or Agent: Date:
15
Updated 7/1/
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
e
w
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Project Description (please attach additional sheets.)
A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment.
A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned.
List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area.
Is the request amending the Zoning Map?
If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed.
Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance ?
If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed.
WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION
Mailing Address: Planning Counter
PO Box 145471
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
In Person: Planning Counter
451 South State Street, Room 215
Telephone: (801) 535-7700
INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I
understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the
submittal package.
16
September 22, 2020
Salt Lake City Planning Commission
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Re: Description of Master Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 810 E 800 S
Planning Commission,
We are seeking to develop and construct a mixed commercial / residential building at 810 E 800
S, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake County Parcel Number 16-08-176-024-0000 (the “Property”).
We are submitting two applications in conjunction with each other to begin this process: 1) an
amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Central Community Master Plan, changing the
Property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial, and 2) a zoning map
amendment changing the Property from R-2 to CB (Community Business).
The Property is subject to the Central Community Master Plan, East Central North
Neighborhood, which has the Property listed as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use
Map. Additionally, the property is currently zoned as R-2. The Property is an empty lot and has
been that way for well over twenty-five years. It currently attracts the transient population and
has been not beneficially used for a significant period of time.
The corner of 800 S 800 E has turned into a small commercial hub, with several businesses
located immediately to the west of the Property and zoned as Small Neighborhood Business.1
Smith’s grocery store is located immediately to the east of the Property, which is zoned CB.
With the Property sandwiched between commercial uses, it is not a desirable location for a single
family or two-family dwelling. Additionally, the market value of the Property, given its
excellent commercial location, makes it cost prohibitive to build a single-family dwelling or two-
family dwelling under the current zoning. The Property will most likely continue to sit vacant
unless it is allowed to be used for commercial or mixed-use purposes.
We intend to build a two-story mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and
residential units on the second floor. We have included a proposed site plan and a rough
rendering of the elevation of the building as seen from 800 South. This use meets the purposes
of the Master Plan by locating “community level retail sales and services on appropriate
arterials,” in an area that is already surrounded by commercial uses. See Central Community
Master Plan, CLU-1.2, page 11. There is also a heavy emphasis in the Central Community
Master Plan on providing mixed use commercial / residential properties with “ground level
1 There is a garage immediately to the west of the Property that is zoned R-2. However, that garage juts
out from a parcel further to the south that has a duplex with in home business operating out of the
property. The block face surrounding the Property appears to be all commercial. The only property that
adjoins the Property and is used solely as a residential home is immediately to the south.
17
commercial space [and] apartment or condominium units above the first floor,” especially in the
9th and 9th area just to the south of the Property. See Central Community Master Plan, page 11.
This development meets these objectives and will add to the community.
We respectfully request that the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map be
amended so that the Property is designated at Community Commercial and that the Property be
rezoned to from R-2 to CB.
We’re excited to move forward with this project. Please reach out to me if you have any
questions.
Best,
Stanford Bell
801-884-9044
18
EXISTINGBUILDING(1442 SF)
EXISTINGBUILDING
800 SOUTH
810 E 800 S (0.16 ACRES - 6850 SF)
2600 SF (LOWER)
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING POWER POLE
ADA
2900 SF (UPPER)
ARTIST
STUDIO
ARTIST
STUDIO
DUMPSTER
17
'
-
6
"
21
'
-
6
"
EXISTINGBUILDING
SCALE:
A1
A1-01
SITE PLAN - 081820810 E 800 S
1/16"=1'-0"
19
COFFEE BOUTIQUE GALLERY
810 EAST CONCEPT SKETCH 8/24/20BOUTIQUE COMMERCIAL GROUND FLOORRESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE
810
20
ATTACHMENT D: EXISTING CONDITIONS &
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
CURRENT USES OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS AND THOSE WITHIN THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY
Abutting property to the north:
The properties to the north and across 800 South are single-family residences that are zoned R-2
(Single and Two-Family Residential).
Abutting property to the south:
The property to the south is zoned R-2 and there is a single-family home on the property.
Abutting property to the east:
The property to the east is zoned CB (Community Business) and there is a Smith’s grocery store on
the site.
Abutting property to the west:
The property to the west is zoned R-2 and there is a duplex on the property. The property to the west
of it has a commercial building and is zoned SNB (Small Neighborhood Business).
CURRENT AND PROPOSED ZONING STANDARDS (21A.24.110 and 21A.26.030)
The subject property is zoned R-2 and the proposal is for CB. The following table provides the
general yard and bulk requirements for development within the zoning districts.
R-2 Zoning District (Existing)
Minimum Lot Area (single-family detached dwellings) Minimum Lot Width
5,000 sq. ft. 50 ft.
CB Zoning District (Proposed)
Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width
None None
21
R-2 Zoning District (Single-family)
Front Yard Rear Yard Interior Side
Yards
Maximum
Building
Coverage
Height
Average of
block face or
20 ft.
25% of lot depth not less
than 15 ft., need not be
more than 25’
4 ft. on one or
10 ft. on the
other
40% 28 ft. to the ridge or the
average of the block face;
20 ft. for flat roofs
CB Zoning District
Front Yard Rear
Yard
Interior
Side Yards
Height Maximum Building
Coverage
Landscape Yards Buffer Yards
None
required
10 ft. None
required
30 ft. NA Front yard, if
provided
7 ft. next to
residential
Allowed uses in each zone:
Land use tables for each zone are below for reference.
Permitted and Conditional Uses by District
Use R-2 CB
Accessory use, except those that are specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P P
Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C8 P
Alcohol:
Bar establishment (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11
Brewpub (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11
Tavern (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) C10,11
Animal: Veterinary office P
Antenna, communication tower P
Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone C
Art gallery P
Artisan food production (2,500 square feet or less in floor area) P24
Bed and breakfast P
Bed and breakfast inn P
Bed and breakfast manor C3
Clinic (medical, dental) P
Commercial food preparation P
Community garden C P
22
Daycare center, adult P
Daycare center, child C22 P
Daycare, nonregistered home daycare or preschool P22 P22
Daycare, registered home daycare or preschool P22 P22
Dwelling:
Assisted living facility (large) P
Assisted living facility (small) P
Dwelling, accessory unit P
Dwelling, assisted living facility (limited capacity) C
Dwelling, group home (small)15 P
Dwelling, manufactured home P
Dwelling, single-family (detached) P
Dwelling, twin home and two-family P2
Group home (large)17 P
Group home (small) when located above or below first story office, retail, or
commercial use, or on the first story where the unit is not located adjacent to street
frontage18
P
Living quarter for caretaker or security guard P
Multi-family P
Rooming (boarding) house P
Eleemosynary facility C P
Financial institution P
Financial institution with drive-through facility P9
Gas station C
Government facility C C
Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P
Home occupation P24 P23
Hotel/motel C
Large wind energy system P
Library P
Limousine service (small) C
Mixed use development P
Mobile food business (operation on private property) P
Municipal service uses, including City utility uses and police and fire stations C C
Museum P
Nursing care facility P
Office P
Open space P
Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P
Park P P
Parking:
23
Off site P
Park and ride lot C
Park and ride lot shared with existing use P P
Place of worship on lot less than 4 acres in size C P
Reception center P
Recreation (indoor) P
Recycling collection station P
Restaurant P
Restaurant with drive-through facility P9
Retail goods establishment P
Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area P
With drive-through facility P9
Retail service establishment P
Furniture repair shop P
With drive-through facility P9
Reverse vending machine P
Sales and display (outdoor) P
School:
College or university P
Music conservatory P
Professional and vocational P
Seminary and religious institute C P
Seasonal farm stand P
Studio, art P
Theater, live performance P12
Theater, movie C
Urban farm P P
Utility, building or structure P5 P2
Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe, or pole P5 P2
Vehicle:
Automobile repair (minor) P
Qualifying provisions for CB:
2. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations.
9. Subject to conformance to the provisions in section 21A.40.060 of this title for drive-through use regulations.
10. Subject to conformance with the provisions in section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title.
11. In CN and CB Zoning Districts, the total square footage, including patio space, shall not exceed 2,200 square feet in total.
Total square footage will include a maximum 1,750 square feet of floor space within a business and a maximum of 450 square
feet in an outdoor patio area.
22. Subject to section 21A.36.130 of this title.
23. Allowed only within legal conforming single-family, duplex, and multi-family dwellings and subject to section 21A.36.030
of this title.
24
24. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.
Qualifying provisions for R-2:
2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no more than 3 such dwellings
are located along the same block face (within subdivisions approved after April 12, 1995).
5. See subsection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations.
8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of subsection 21A.24.010S of this title.
22. Subject to section 21A.36.130 of this title.
24. Subject to section 21A.36.030 of this title.
25
ATTACHMENT E: ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
MASTER PLAN AMENDMENTS
State Law, Utah Code Annotated, Title 10 Chapter 9a, requires that all municipalities have a master
plan. However, there is no specific criteria relating to master plan amendments. The City does not
have specific criteria relating to master plan amendments. However, City Code Section 21A.02.040 –
Effect of Adopted Master Plans or General Plans addresses this issue in the following way:
All master plans or general plans adopted by the planning commission and city council
for the city, or for an area of the city, shall serve as an advisory guide for land use
decisions. Amendments to the text of this title or zoning map should be consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the applicable adopted master plan or
general plan of Salt Lake City. (Ord. 26-95 § 2(1-4), 1995)
In this case, the master plan is being amended in order to provide consistency between the Central
Community Master Plan and the proposed zoning designation of the subject property. In this case,
the master plan identifies the property as low density residential. The zoning map and master plan
requests facilitate a rezoning of the property to the Community Business district, consistent with the
adjacent property to the east. This district allows for a much wider variety of uses. The small size of
the parcel limits the practicality of many of these permitted uses on the site. The applicant’s
preliminary proposal for two-story mixed-use building with commercial on the first floor and
residential units on the second floor would be compatible with the neighborhood and serve as a
transition between the more intensive use of the Smith’s property to the east and the duplex and small
commercial building to the west. State Law does include a required process in relation to a public
hearing and recommendation from the Planning Commission for a master plan amendment. The
required process and noticing requirements have been met. Should the Planning Commission make a
positive recommendation for the zoning map amendment, an amendment to the master plan is also
appropriate.
ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS
21A.50.050: A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a
matter committed to the legislative discretion of the city council and is not controlled by any one
standard. In making a decision to amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider the
following:
Factor Finding Rationale
1.Whether a proposed
map amendment is
consistent with the
purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through
its various adopted
planning documents;
Complies As discussed in Issue 1, the proposed
zoning amendment is consistent
with Plan Salt Lake and policies
within the Central Community
Master Plan. The master plan
amendment will provide consistency
with the land use map in the Central
Community Master Plan. This
proposal would provide a transition
from the more intensive commercial
development to the east with the
residential and small commercial
development to the west.
2.Whether a proposed
map amendment furthers
the specific purpose
statements of the zoning
ordinance.
Complies Section 21A.02.030 of the Salt Lake
City Code provides the purpose and
intent of the overall Zoning
Ordinance stating that it is to,
“promote the health, safety, morals,
convenience, order, prosperity and
26
welfare of the present and future
inhabitants of Salt Lake City, to
implement the adopted plans of the
city, and to carry out the purposes of
the municipal land use development
and management act…and other
relevant statutes.” Additionally, it is
to address the following:
A. Lessen congestion in the streets
or roads;
B. Secure safety from fire and other
dangers;
C. Provide adequate light and air;
D. Classify land uses and distribute
land development and utilization;
E. Protect the tax base;
F. Secure economy in governmental
expenditures;
G. Foster the city's industrial,
business and residential
development; and
H. Protect the environment.
The proposed master plan and map
amendment would foster the city’s
development with additional
commercial space and residential
units on a parcel that has been
vacant for 30 years. It would protect,
and likely increase, the tax base and
possibly lessen congestion in the
streets by placing more residences
and neighborhood scale commercial
space in the neighborhood.
3. The extent to which a
proposed map
amendment will affect
adjacent properties;
Complies As discussed in Issue 2 and
Attachment D, the proposed map
amendment will have an effect on
the adjacent properties since a use
more intensive than a single-family
home could be constructed.
However, the parcel has been vacant
for 30 years and has not
redeveloped. The proposed zone is
consistent with the property to the
east and, given its size, would likely
provide a transition to the less
intensively developed properties to
the west.
4. Whether a proposed
map amendment is
consistent with the
purposes and provisions
of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may
impose additional
standards
The zone is
consistent
with
any other
applicable
overlays.
The site is located within the
Groundwater Source Protection
Overlay and is within the boundaries
of a National Historic District. It
would be required to comply with
the requirements of the
Groundwater Source Protection
overlay. City historic preservation
requirements do not apply to
properties within National Historic
Districts.
27
5. The adequacy of public
facilities and services
intended to serve the
subject property,
including, but not limited
to, roadways, parks and
recreational facilities,
police and fire protection,
schools, stormwater
drainage systems, water
supplies, and wastewater
and refuse collection.
City services
can be
provided
to the
site.
The subject property is located
within a built environment where
public facilities and services already
exist. Redevelopment on this
property may require upgrading or
installation of utilities and drainage
systems.
No concerns were received from
other City departments regarding
the zoning amendment or the
potential for development on these
properties as long as normal
development requirements are met.
28
ATTACHMENT F: PUBLIC PROCESS AND COMMENTS
Public Notice, Meetings, Comments
The following is a list of public meetings and other public input opportunities related to the proposed
project:
Notice of Application to Recognized Community Organization:
A notice of application was sent to the East Central and East Liberty Park Community Councils on
October 14, 2020. The community council was given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to
request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment.
The East Liberty Park Community Council held a Zoom meeting on October 22, 2020 that the
applicant, developer, and staff attended. Phil Winston presented the project and also stated the
applicant was willing to enter into a development agreement prohibiting a restaurant or bar.
Comments were generally supportive of the proposal and neighbors have indicated that they were
against a restaurant or bar.
The Community Council submitted a letter of support (attached) for the project with a development
agreement.
Open House:
An online open house was posted on October 19, 2020.
Notice of the public hearing for the proposal included:
Early notification sent to property owners within 300’ on October 15, 2020.
Public hearing notice posted on December 29, 2020.
Public notice posted on City and State website and Planning Division list serve on December 29,
2020.
Public hearing notice sent to property owners within 300’ on December 29, 2020.
Public Input:
Staff has received three emails in support of the proposal that are attached.
29
ELPCO (East Liberty Park Community Organization) elpcoslc@gmail.com www.facebook/com/ELPCO
January 6, 2021
Dear SLC Planning Commission:
The board of ELPCO, the East Liberty Park Community Organization, is writing in support of the request by
Stanford Bell and Phil Winston of Altus Development Group to amend the Central Community Master Plan and
the zoning map for a development project at 810 East 800 South [Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00740 &
PLNPCM2020-00741].
Our positive recommendation results from a careful examination of this proposal, a comprehensive
presentation by the developers, and feedback from residents who live near the project area.
We support this project for the following reasons:
• The development creates a better use for a vacant property
• The project adds housing units to the neighborhood
• The zoning change to CB (Community Business) is consistent with the proposed design and with the
zoning of adjacent parcels
• The project mixes residential and commercial uses in a scale that this appropriate for the streetscape
• The zoning and master plan changes are supported by nearby residents
In October 2020, Phil Winston from Altus Designs presented about this project for 20 minutes during an online
ELPCO community meeting. He described the purpose of the development and the reason for the zoning
changes and reviewed his team’s community engagement efforts.
You can watch the ELPCO presentation by Phil Winston here: https://youtu.be/lYhdavQ-QlE?t=480
During this presentation, Phil Winston mentioned his decision to not allow a restaurant or bar to occupy the
commercial space based on his conversations with residents. He added he would codify this in a development
agreement attached to the project.
ELPCO supports this development agreement, would recommend that it be expanded to include confirmation
of mixed-use design with residential units and the use of durable building materials consistent with the
surrounding properties. We would also like to see this development agreement attached to the title of the
property. We recommend the SLC City Council work with Altus to complete this development agreement.
Additionally, ELPCO contacted residents of 800 East who live adjacent to the project and have recently been
involved with the Telegraph Exchange Lofts proposal. Here are two comments we received regarding this
project.
We support it completely. First of all, it fits the location and scale very well. They have done a great job
of checking in and clearing the idea with us and other neighbors. We feel it does a great job filling that
eyesore of a space that is not ideal for home or duplex, while also adding housing. The design acts as a
buffer to yards/homes from 800 S and has well thought out design and greenery to blend, while still
creating a structure that will visually enhance the neighborhood.
30
ELPCO (East Liberty Park Community Organization) elpcoslc@gmail.com www.facebook/com/ELPCO
[…] are in support of the project. While hesitant to set the precedent of spot rezoning, we agree that
this is a different situation than Telegraph Exchange and this lot will never thrive as anything but
commercial. Phil Winston and the Demuris did a good job in engaging the immediate neighborhood for
feedback and the mixed-use design will greatly improve this stretch of 800 South.
In summary, ELPCO supports the master plan and zoning map amendments for the project at 810 East 800
South.
Sincerely,
Jason Stevenson, ELPCO co-chair
Darryl High, ELPCO co-chair
Dave Richards, Land Use advisor
Judi Short, Land Use advisor
About ELPCO
ELPCO is the East Liberty Park Community Organization—a local, city-sanctioned community organization that
represents the residents and businesses in the East Liberty Park area of Salt Lake City. The area covered by
ELPCO is defined by the boundaries of 700 E to 1300 E and 800 S to 1700 S. ELPCO currently meets online on the
fourth Thursday of every month. Learn more at www.facebook.com/ELPCO or by emailing elpcoslc@gmail.com
- Sign up for ELPCO's twice-monthly e-newsletters here: http://eepurl.com/gcOcCL
31
From:John Webster
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) 810 East 800 South proposal
Date:Friday, November 20, 2020 12:01:54 PM
Hi Sara,
I'm writing in favor of the development proposal on 800 south and 810 East, just West of the Smith's
grocery store.
I've been a home owner in the area since the early 1990s and watched the surrounding area improve
dramatically. That 800 South area around Smiths has been a bit of a neglected space. Seems that city
and private development has favored the 900 South corridor. We appreciate the amenities that
development afforded and would welcome extending the rejuvenation to 800 South. The mix of
commercial space with residential above is a great combination. We need the tax base business brings
and more residential housing. Win win.
Thank you for your consideration.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Warm regards,
- John Webster
32
From:Tom Brennan
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2020-00740/00741 Public Comment
Date:Friday, October 23, 2020 8:46:48 AM
Sara,
I’m writing in general support of the proposed development at 810 East 800 South. This is an
appropriate use at this location. The general scale of the proposed development is in character with
other neighborhood business in the 9th and 9th neighborhood.
While this is an application for a zoning change and not a design review, I would encourage that the
application to change zoning be tied in some manner to the materials used for the exterior.
Specifically I would encourage that materials be appropriate for the neighborhood – specifically not
Exterior Insulated Insulation (EIFS) more commonly referred to as stucco or Dryvit. While the
rendering is conceptual (and could in fact drastically change), what appears to be proposed is a
traditional brick and industrial sash façade could easily be built using an EIFS system which would be
completely inappropriate for the area.
Thank you,
-- Thomas S. Brennan, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB 1018 S. Lake Street Salt Lake City, UT 84105
33
From:John Ewanowski
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) Public Comment - 810 E. 800 South development
Date:Monday, November 30, 2020 1:03:33 PM
Sara,
I am writing as an architect, member of the SLC Historic Landmark Commission, and 9th and
9th resident to register my support for Altus Development Group's proposed project at 810 E.
800 South. The current vacant lot is an eyesore, and the building depicted in the 8/24/20
Concept Sketch is handsome and appropriately scaled. I like how the design references the
past while utilizing contemporary materials. As a result, I support the zoning map amendment
and master plan amendment as depicted by the applicant.
Sincerely,
John
--
John Ewanowski
1022 S. 900 East | Salt Lake City, UT 84105
34
ATTACHMENT G: DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS
Public Utilities – Jason Draper, Jason.Draper@slcgov.com
No objections to the zone and master plan amendment. Development will likely require off-site
improvements including and upgrade of the water main.
Zoning, Building, and Fire Code – Greg Mikolash, Gregory.Mikolash@slcgov.com
Building Services finds no zoning, building code, or fire code related issues associated with this
request.
Engineering – Scott Weiler, Scott.Weiler@slcgov.com
No objection.
Transportation – Michael Barry, Michael.Barry@slcgov.com
Transportation has no objections to this Zoning Map and master Plan amendment
35
3. PLANNING COMMISSION
C. Agenda/Minutes/Newspaper Notice
January 13, 2021
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the
Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation
January 13, 2021, at 5:30 p.m.
(The order of the items may change at the Commission’s discretion)
This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County Building. Commission Members
will connect remotely. We want to make sure everyone interested in the Planning Commission meetings
can still access the meetings how they feel most comfortable. If you are interested in watching the Planning
Commission meetings, they are available on the following platforms:
• YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
• SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the meeting or provide general
comments, email; planning.comments@slcgov.com or connect with us on Webex at:
• http://tiny.cc/slc-pc-01132021
Instructions for using Webex will be provided on our website at SLC.GOV/Planning
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 9, 2020
REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Maven Lofts Design Review & Planned Development at approximately 156 East 900 South -
Joe Jacoby, representing Jacoby Architects, has submitted applications to the city for Design
Review and a Planned Development to construct an addition that would create 57 new residential
units located at approximately 156 E 900 South. The proposal is for a 4 -story building that will be
located roughly on the same footprint as the existing building. The applicant is requesting Design
Review approval to allow for an additional 15 FT of building height, for a total building height of
approximately 45 FT. Through the Planned Development process, the applicant is requesting to
decrease the front, rear, and corner side yard setbacks for the second, third, and fourth stories of the
building. The exterior wall of the prop osed upper stories is slightly stepped back from the exterior wall
of the existing building, which is located right at the property line. The CC zoning district requires a
front and corner side yard setback of 15’ and a rear yard setback of 10’. In order to utilize the ground
floor of the existing building, the applicant is also requesting to allow the rooftop garden areas to
count toward landscaping requirements. The property is located within the CC (Commercial
Corridor) zoning district in council district 5, represented by Darin Mano (Staff contact: Amy
Thompson at (385) 226 -9001 or amy.thompson@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00721
& PLNPCM2020-00722
2. Windsor Court Planned Development at approximately 1966 S Windsor Street - Mike
Spainhower, representing the property owner, is requesting approval for a 17 -unit multi-family
dwelling at 1966 S. Windsor Street. The project would be built on an existing vacant lot. The total site
is 0.7 acres. The Planned Development is needed to address a modification to the front yard setback
and landscape buffers. The subject property is located in the RMF -35 zoning district and within
Council District 7, represented by Amy Fowler (Staff contact: Katia Pace at (385) 226 -8499
or katia.pace@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020 -00727
3. Village at North Station Building D Design Review at approximately 1925 W North Temple –
Michael Batt, representing the property owner, is seeking Design Revie w approval to modify a front
setback requirement for a proposed building located at approximately 1925 W North Temple. The
applicant is requesting to modify the maximum 5' front yard setback requirement due to the location
of a high voltage power line alon g Orange Street. They are requesting increased front yard setback
so that the front of the building is a required minimum safe distance from the power line. Modifications
to the front yard setback can be approved through the Design Review process. The subject property
is located within the TSA-MUEC-T (Transit Station Area District - Mixed Use Employment Center
Station – Transition) zoning district. The property is in Council District 1, represented by James
Rogers (Staff contact: Daniel Echeverria at (385) 226-3835 or daniel.echeverria@slcgov.com) Case
Number PLNPCM2020-00730
4. 9th Mixed-Use Multifamily Design Review – Eric Moran, on behalf of the property owner and
management company, RD Management, along with architects Peter Jacobsen and Jeff Byers of
The Richardson Design Group, are seeking Design Review approva l to redevelop the property
located at the southwest corner of the intersection of 400 South and 900 East with residential and
commercial space. The proposal includes 264 residential units and approximately 16,000 square
feet of commercial space. The app licant is requesting Design Review by the Planning Commission
to allow for a façade length greater than 200 feet in the TSA-UN-C zoning district and for modifications
to the design standards in 21A.37. The property is located within Council District 4, re presented by
Ana Valdemoros. (Staff contact: Sara Javoronok at (385) 226 -4448 or sara.javoronok@slcgov.com )
Case number PLNPCM2020-00641
5. AT&T Wireless Communication Facility Conditional Use at approximately 1550 South 5600
West – A request by Brian Sieck of Smartlink for a new AT&T wireless communications facility with
an 80’ monopole and unmanned communication site located at approximately 1550 South 5600 West.
The proposed site would be located in the northwest corner of the parcel. The subject property is
located within the M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zoning district and is located within Council District 2,
represented by Andrew Johnston (Staff Contact: Sara Javoronok at (385) 226 -4448 or
sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case number PLNPCM2020-00819
6. Master Plan Amendment & Rezone at approximately 810 East 800 South – Salt Lake City has
received a request from Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group representing the property owner
of 810 East 800 South, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning map. The
proposal would rezone the property located at a pproximately 810 East 800 South from R-2 (Single
and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) and the Central Community Master Plan
Future Land Use map designation from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial . The
applicant anticipates developing the site with a two-story building with commercial on the first floor
and residential units on the second floor. The subject property is zoned R-2 (Single and Two-Family
Residential) and is located within Council District 5 represented by Darin Ma no (Staff contact: Sara
Javoronok at (385) 226 -4448 or sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020 -00740
& PLNPCM2020-00741
7. Master Plan Amendment and Rezone at approximately 554 & 560 South 300 East - Salt Lake
City has received a request from Mariel Wirthlin, with The Associated Group and representing the
property owner of 554 and 560 South 300 East, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and
the zoning map. The proposal would rezone the properties located at approximately 554 and 560
South 300 East from RO (Residential Office) to RMU (Residential/Mixed Use) and amend the Central
Community Future Land Use Map from Residential/Office Mixed Use to High Mixed Use. The
proposed Master Plan amendment to High Mixed Use and rezone to RMU is intended to allow retail
service uses on the property, in addition to office use. The subject property is zoned RO
(Residential Office) and is located within Council District 4, represented by Ana Valdemoros (Staff
contact: Nannette Larsen at (385) 386-2761 or nannette.larsen@slcgov.com) Case numbers
PLNPCM2020-00604 & PLNPCM2020-00712
8. Fence Height Zoning Ordinance Amendment – A request by the City Council to amend the zoning
ordinance regulations to remove the special exception process that allows for over -height fences
(Chapter 21A.52.030) and to define instances where a taller fence may be appropriate and approved
by right. The proposed amendments would limit fence, wall, and hedge height to four feet (4’) in front
yards and six feet (6’) in the side or rear yards, except for in a few specific instances. Those instances
include when a residential district abuts a nonresidential district, in extraction industries and
manufacturing districts, public facilities and recrea tion facilities where a greater height is necessary
to protect public safety, private game courts, and construction fencing. Additionally, the Planning
Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission would have the authority to grant additional
fence, wall, or hedge height as part of a land use application. The amendments proposed to Chapter
21A.40 will affect all zoning districts throughout Salt Lake City. The changes would apply Citywide.
(Staff contact: Krissy Gilmore at (801) 535 -7780 or kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com) Case number
PLNPCM2020-00511
For Planning Commission agendas, staff reports, and minutes, visit the Planning Division’s website at slc.gov/planning/public-
meetings. Staff Reports will be posted the Friday prior to the meeting and minutes will be posted two days after they are ratified,
which usually occurs at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission.
Salt Lake City Planning Commission January 13, 2021 Page 1
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
This meeting was held electronically pursuant to the
Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
A roll is being kept of all who attended the Planning Commission Meeting. The meeting was called to
order at 05:30 PM. Audio recordings of the Planning Commission meetings are retained for a period of
time. These minutes are a summary of the meeting. For complete commentary and presentation of the
meeting, please visit https://www.youtube.com/c/SLCLiveMeetings.
Present for the Planning Commission meeting were: Chairperson, Brenda Scheer; Vice Chairperson,
Amy Barry; Commissioners, Adrienne Bell, Carolynn Hoskins, Matt Lyon, Sara Urquhart, and Crystal
Young-Otterstrom. Commissioners Jon Lee, and Andres Paredes were excused.
Planning Staff members present at the meeting were: Michaela Oktay, Planning Deputy Director; Nick
Norris, Planning Director; Paul Nielson, Attorney; Amy Thompson, Senior Planner; Katia Pace, Principal
Planner; Daniel Echeverria, Senior Planner; Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner; Nannette Larsen, Principal
Planner; Krissy Gilmore, Principal Planner; and Marlene Rankins, Administrative Secretary.
Chairperson Brenda Scheer, read the emergency proclamation for holding a remote meeting.
APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 9, 2020, MEETING MINUTES. 02:31
MOTION 02:46
Commissioner Young-Otterstrom moved to approve the December 9, 2020 meeting minutes.
Commissioner Urquhart seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Lyon,
Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. Commissioner Hoskins abstained from voting as
she was not present for the said meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR 04:24
Chairperson Scheer informed the public of the long agenda and that there will be a break half-way through
the agenda.
Vice Chairperson Barry stated she had nothing to report.
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR 05:33
Michaela Oktay, Planning Director, stated she had nothing to report.
05:55
Maven Lofts Design Review & Planned Development at approximately 156 East 900 South - Joe
Jacoby, representing Jacoby Architects, has submitted applications to the city for Design Review and a
Planned Development to construct an addition that would create 57 new residential units located at
approximately 156 E 900 South. The proposal is for a 4-story building that will be located roughly on the
same footprint as the existing building. The applicant is requesting Design Review approval to allow for
an additional 15 FT of building height, for a total building height of approximately 45 FT. Through the
Planned Development process, the applicant is requesting to decrease the front, rear, and corner side
yard setbacks for the second, third, and fourth stories of the building. The exterior wall of the proposed
upper stories is slightly stepped back from the exterior wall of the existing building, which is located right
at the property line. The CC zoning district requires a front and corner side yard setback of 15’ and a rear
yard setback of 10’. In order to utilize the ground floor of the existing building, the applicant is also
Salt Lake City Planning Commission January 13, 2021 Page 6
PUBLIC HEARING 2:28:51
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing; seeing no one wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer
closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION 2:29:15
Commissioner Bachman stated, based on the findings listed in the Staff Report, the information
presented and input received during the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission
approve the Conditional Use for the AT&T communications site with an 80-foot monopole and
associated equipment (Petition PLNPCM2020-00819) subject to the following conditions:
1. Any modifications to the approved plans after the issuance of a building permit must be
specifically requested by the applicant and approved by the Planning Division prior to
execution.
2. Applicant shall comply with all other department/division requirements.
Commissioner Hoskins seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins,
Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passed unanimously.
2:30:50
Master Plan Amendment & Rezone at approximately 810 East 800 South – Salt Lake City has
received a request from Stanford Bell of Altus Development Group representing the property owner of
810 East 800 South, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning map. The proposal
would rezone the property located at approximately 810 East 800 South from R-2 (Single and Two-Family
Residential) to CB (Community Business) and the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use map
designation from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. The applicant anticipates
developing the site with a two-story building with commercial on the first floor and residential units on the
second floor. The subject property is zoned R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) and is located within
Council District 5 represented by Darin Mano (Staff contact: Sara Javoronok at (385) 226-4448 or
sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00740 & PLNPCM2020-00741
Sara Javoronok, Senior Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in the case
file). She stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation
to the City Council.
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Whether it’s in the Commissions purview to require a development agreement
Phillip Winston, applicant, provided a presentation with further details.
The Commission, Staff and Applicant discussed the following:
• Clarification on why the CB zone was chosen
• Setback standards for CB zone
PUBLIC HEARING 2:48:35
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing;
Zachary Dussault – Stated his support of the request.
Cindy Cromer – Stated there is no way that the CB zone with its wide array of allowed uses is appropriate
with at this sensitive location.
Nathan Florence - Provided an email comment stating his support of the request.
Salt Lake City Planning Commission January 13, 2021 Page 7
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer closed the Public Hearing.
The Commission discussed the following:
• Possibility of additional condition for a recommendation to the City Council
MOTION 3:01:53
Commissioner Bell stated, based on the findings and analysis in the staff report, testimony, and
discussion at the public hearing, I move that the Planning Commission forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, file PLNPCM2020-
00740, proposed zone change from R-2 (Single and Two Family Residential District) to CB
(Community Business) and file PLNPCM2020-00741 proposed master plan amendment from Low
Density Residential to Community Commercial.
Commissioner Bachman seconded the motion. Commissioners Bachman, Barry, Bell, Hoskins,
Lyon, Urquhart, and Young-Otterstrom voted “Aye”. The motion passed unanimously.
3:03:36
Master Plan Amendment and Rezone at approximately 554 & 560 South 300 East - Salt Lake City
has received a request from Mariel Wirthlin, with The Associated Group and representing the property
owner of 554 and 560 South 300 East, to amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning
map. The proposal would rezone the properties located at approximately 554 and 560 South 300 East
from RO (Residential Office) to RMU (Residential/Mixed Use) and amend the Central Community Future
Land Use Map from Residential/Office Mixed Use to High Mixed Use. The proposed Master Plan
amendment to High Mixed Use and rezone to RMU is intended to allow retail service uses on the
property, in addition to office use. The subject property is zoned RO (Residential Office) and is located
within Council District 4, represented by Ana Valdemoros (Staff contact: Nannette Larsen at (385) 386-
2761 or nannette.larsen@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLNPCM2020-00604 & PLNPCM2020-00712
Nannette Larsen, Principal Planner, reviewed the petition as outlined in the Staff Report (located in the
case file). She stated Staff recommended that the Planning Commission forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council.
The Commission and Staff discussed the following:
• Clarification on how the height difference changes with the RMU zone
• Clarification on what the rezone is allows
Mariel Wirthlin, applicant, provided further information.
PUBLIC HEARING 3:16:38
Chairperson Scheer opened the Public Hearing;
Zachary Dussault – Stated his support of the request.
Cindy Cromer – Stated this RO zone is a bad zone and every square inch of it we can get rid of in the
City is a good thing.
Seeing no one else wished to speak; Chairperson Scheer closed the Public Hearing.
Notice of Public Hearing
On Wednesday, January 13, 2021, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
will hold a public hearing to consider making recommendations to the City
Council regarding the following petitions:
1. Master Plan Amendment & Rezone at approximately 810 East 800 South
– Salt Lake City has received a request from Stanford Bell of Altus Devel-
opment Group representing the property owner of 810 East 800 South, to
amend the Central Community Master Plan and the zoning map. The pro-
posal would rezone the property located at approximately 810 East 800
South from R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Busi-
ness) and the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use map designa-
tion from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. The applicant
anticipates developing the site with a two-story building with commercial
on the first floor and residential units on the second floor. The subject prop-
erty is zoned R-2 (Single and Two-Family Residential) and is located within
Council District 5 represented by Darin Mano (Staff contact: Sara Javoro-
nok at (385) 226-4448 or sara.javoronok@slcgov.com) Case numbers PLN-
PCM2020-00740 & PLNPCM2020-007412.
2. Fence Height Zoning Ordinance Amendment – A request by the City
Council to amend the zoning ordinance regulations to remove the special
exception process that allows for over-height fences (Chapter 21A.52.030)
and to define instances where a taller fence may be appropriate and ap-
proved by right. The proposed amendments would limit fence, wall, and
hedge height to four feet (4’) in front yards and six feet (6’) in the side or rear
yards, except for in a few specific instances. Those instances include when
a residential district abuts a nonresidential district, in extraction industries
and manufacturing districts, public facilities and recreation facilities where a
greater height is necessary to protect public safety, private game courts, and
construction fencing. Additionally, the Planning Commission and the Historic
Landmark Commission would have the authority to grant additional fence,
wall, or hedge height as part of a land use application. The amendments
proposed to Chapter 21A.40 will affect all zoning districts throughout Salt
Lake City. The changes would apply Citywide. (Staff contact: Krissy Gilm-
ore at (801) 535-7780 or kristina.gilmore@slcgov.com) Case number PLN-
PCM2020-00511
The public hearing will begin at 5:30 p.m. via Webex. To participate go to:
http://tiny.cc/slc-pc-01132021
This Meeting will not have an anchor location at the City and County Build-
ing. Commission Members will connect remotely. If you are interested in
watching the Planning Commission meetings, they are available on the fol-
lowing platforms:
YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.
slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Public Hearing portion of the
meeting or provide general comments, email; planning.comments@slcgov.
com.
DN0000000
4. PUBLIC COMMENT
From:cindy cromer
To:Javoronok, Sara
Subject:(EXTERNAL) comments on proposal for 810 E 800 S
Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 4:24:29 PM
To Members of the Salt Lake Planning Commission
From cindy cromer
Re request for rezoning and master plan amendment at 810 E 800 S
1/13/21
My history with this parcel goes back almost 35 years to the expansion of the Smith's Food
King, certainly one of the worst land use decisions the City has made in the past 40 years. In
addition to wiping out dozens of units of modest housing, the City threw the balance of the
9th and 9th business district out of whack and precipitated the demolition of even more
housing to accommodate the loading dock after the expansion.
It was the inadequate loading dock on 900 S which led to the demise of the house at 810 E
800 S. The owner fled because of the trucks idling outside his bedroom and then the house
burned.
There is no way that the CB zone with its wide array of allowed uses is appropriate at this
sensitive location. And the neighbors and community organization can only be assured of
getting what they are willing to support if the City Council enters into a development
agreement with the owner to specify the mass and materials of the new building as well as
limiting the uses. I am not speaking to the integrity of the owner, only that there are no
guarantees that he will be able to do what the neighbors can support. The CB zone itself will
allow abundant uses, forms, and materials which no one would support.
The appropriate zone is the RMU-35 which would allow the proposed uses without the
encroachment of a more intensive zone into the smaller scale uses to the west. There are
lessons to learn from what the City did decades ago. One of them is that if you make a
mistake in land use, you probably will not be able to fix it. Another one is that the bad
decision will haunt future development. The CB zone was never appropriate here and its
extension into the residential area is a request that I cannot support when there is a new
alternative zone to accomplish what the owner wants to do, the RMU-35.
From:Rankins, Marlene
To:Javoronok, Sara
Cc:Oktay, Michaela
Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Rezoning and master plan amendment 810 E 800 S
Date:Tuesday, January 26, 2021 11:57:20 AM
Hi Sara,
Please see the email below.
Thanks,
MARLENE RANKINS
Administrative Secretary
Planning Division
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
TEL 801-535-6171
Email marlene.rankins@slcgov.com
www.OurNeighborhoods.CAN.com
www.slc.gov/planning/
www.slc.gov/historic-preservation/
Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions
as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or
prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in
response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written
feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.
From: Nathan Florence <nathansflorence@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 5:41 PM
To: Planning Public Comments <planning.comments@slcgov.com>
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Rezoning and master plan amendment 810 E 800 S
I’m around the corner from the parcel in question and have dealt with various uses of it for the
almost 20 years we have owned our home at 817 South on 800 East. While we have fought multiple
local projects that we felt overreached or encroached on the street/neighborhood in other locations,
we enthusiastically support this effort for the situation. The location, as it stands now, is not well
suited for its current zoning and the proposed use is creative and fitting. We have been grateful, as
neighbors, for the efforts of the potential developers for engaging with all of the neighbors from the
outset and looking to create a project that really benefits everyone in the neighborhood. It is a great
use for an otherwise problematic property.
We would still like the City to engage in an overall approach to growth that would not be dependent
on this kind of spot re-zone by developers, but in this case we strongly support the application.
Thanks, Nathan and Marian Florence
--
www.nflorencefineart.com
www.artandbelieffilm.com
5. ORIGINAL PETITIONS
PLNPCM2020-00740 & PLNPCM2020-00741
September 22, 2020
Salt Lake City Planning Commission
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Re: Description of Master Plan Amendment and Zone Change for 810 E 800 S
Planning Commission,
We are seeking to develop and construct a mixed commercial / residential building at 810 E 800
S, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake County Parcel Number 16-08-176-024-0000 (the “Property”).
We are submitting two applications in conjunction with each other to begin this process: 1) an
amendment to the Future Land Use Map in the Central Community Master Plan, changing the
Property from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial, and 2) a zoning map
amendment changing the Property from R-2 to CB (Community Business).
The Property is subject to the Central Community Master Plan, East Central North
Neighborhood, which has the Property listed as Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use
Map. Additionally, the property is currently zoned as R-2. The Property is an empty lot and has
been that way for well over twenty-five years. It currently attracts the transient population and
has been not beneficially used for a significant period of time.
The corner of 800 S 800 E has turned into a small commercial hub, with several businesses
located immediately to the west of the Property and zoned as Small Neighborhood Business.1
Smith’s grocery store is located immediately to the east of the Property, which is zoned CB.
With the Property sandwiched between commercial uses, it is not a desirable location for a single
family or two-family dwelling. Additionally, the market value of the Property, given its
excellent commercial location, makes it cost prohibitive to build a single-family dwelling or two-
family dwelling under the current zoning. The Property will most likely continue to sit vacant
unless it is allowed to be used for commercial or mixed-use purposes.
We intend to build a two-story mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and
residential units on the second floor. We have included a proposed site plan and a rough
rendering of the elevation of the building as seen from 800 South. This use meets the purposes
of the Master Plan by locating “community level retail sales and services on appropriate
arterials,” in an area that is already surrounded by commercial uses. See Central Community
Master Plan, CLU-1.2, page 11. There is also a heavy emphasis in the Central Community
Master Plan on providing mixed use commercial / residential properties with “ground level
1 There is a garage immediately to the west of the Property that is zoned R-2. However, that garage juts
out from a parcel further to the south that has a duplex with in home business operating out of the
property. The block face surrounding the Property appears to be all commercial. The only property that
adjoins the Property and is used solely as a residential home is immediately to the south.
commercial space [and] apartment or condominium units above the first floor,” especially in the
9th and 9th area just to the south of the Property. See Central Community Master Plan, page 11.
This development meets these objectives and will add to the community.
We respectfully request that the Central Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map be
amended so that the Property is designated at Community Commercial and that the Property be
rezoned to from R-2 to CB.
We’re excited to move forward with this project. Please reach out to me if you have any
questions.
Best,
Stanford Bell
801-884-9044
EXISTINGBUILDING(1442 SF)
EXISTINGBUILDING
800 SOUTH
810 E 800 S (0.16 ACRES - 6850 SF)
2600 SF (LOWER)
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING POWER POLE
ADA
2900 SF (UPPER)
ARTIST
STUDIO
ARTIST
STUDIO
DUMPSTER
17
'
-
6
"
21
'
-
6
"
EXISTINGBUILDING
SCALE:
A1
A1-01
SITE PLAN - 081820810 E 800 S
1/16"=1'-0"
COFFEE BOUTIQUE GALLERY
810 EAST CONCEPT SKETCH 8/24/20BOUTIQUE COMMERCIAL GROUND FLOORRESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE
810
6. MAILING LIST
Name Address City State Zip
SMITH'S FOOD KING PROPERTIES INC 1014 VINE ST 7TH FLOOR CINCINNATI OH 45202
ES 187779 LC 1099 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
CHRISTOPHER DEMURI; MEREDITH DEMURI (JT)1099 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105
IXCHEL, LLC 1192 E DRAPER PKWY # 152 DRAPER UT 84020
PAUL A DOUGLAS 146 STONE MILL RD LOT 24 HUDSON NY 12534
KEVIN W STIGGE; PAMELA CALLAHAN (JT)1965 RIDGEHILL DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010
HAMILTON PLACE HOUSING CORPORATION 223 W 700 S # C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
SLC 84102 LLC 24101 MOUNTAIN CHARLIE RD LOS GATOS CA 95033
JOSH COOK 2461 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106
CLEARWATER HOMES, LLC 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
800 EAST FOURPLEX LLC 3734 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124
CODY V DERRICK 645 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
BARN THAI LLC 758 E 700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CHRISTOS TSOUFAKIS (JT)760 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ILONA ZENNER 761 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 762 S WINDSOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84102
BECKY S ROBERTS 763 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 764 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
JAMES A HARRIS; CATHERINE CARGILL (JT)765 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 774 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
REED L DURFEY; SHANNON N DURFEY (JT)785 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 801 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 802 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 803 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 805 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
BRIAN C MILES 809 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 809 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 810 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
JULIA BJORNSTAD 813 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 814 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
NATHAN S FLORENCE; MARIAN C FLORENCE (JT)817 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ANGELA CARLSON; MICHAEL S JACOBSEN (JT)818 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
BRENDA L CHRISTENSEN 819 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
SUZANNE MONTGOMERY 823 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
ROBERT S NAK; MARIA L NAK (JT)823 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
CATHERINE E LILLY 824 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 825 E CHASE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84102
BRADLEY R CAIRNS 828 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 829 E CHASE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 829 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
MELODIE RICHARDSON 831 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 832 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
CHARLES T GRAYSON; MELANIE S GRAYSON (JT)832 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
BENJAMIN R KURTIS; ERIKA P KURTIS 833 E 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
Current Occupant 833 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 834 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 836 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 845 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 847 S 800 E Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 850 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 851 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
Current Occupant 876 E 800 S Salt Lake City UT 84102
TONY MARTINEZ PO BOX 1875 SANDY UT 84091
Altus Development Group 336 W BROADWAY ST, STE 110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101
Sara Javoronok, Planning Division PO Box 145480 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 5/26/2021
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 5/26/2021
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/26/20201
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Art Design Board
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Art Design Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Meggie Troili as a member of
the Art Design Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
May 26, 2020
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Fowler,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Art Design Board.
Meggie Troili – to be appointed for a three year term starting from the date of City Council advice
and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 5/26/2021
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 5/26/2021
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/26/20201
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Art Design Board
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Art Design Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Tiffini Porter as a member of
the Art Design Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
May 26, 2020
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Fowler,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Art Design Board.
Tiffini Porter – to be appointed for a three year term starting from the date of City Council advice
and consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 5/27/2021
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 5/27/2021
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/27/2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Housing Authority of Salt Lake City.
STAFF CONTACT: Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation Housing Authority of Salt
Lake City.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint William Davis as a member of
the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
May 27, 2021
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Fowler,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Housing Authority of Salt
Lake City:
William Davis– to be appointed for a four yesr term starting the date of City Council advice and
consent.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 4/2/2021
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 4/2/2021
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 4/2/2021
Amy Fowler, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Police Civilian Review Board.
STAFF CONTACT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
Jessi Eagan
jessi.eagan@slcgov.com
Board Appointment Recommendation: Police Civilian Review Board.
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Justin Rodriguez as a member
of the Police Civilian Review Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
April 2, 2021
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Fowler,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership appointment to the Police Civilian Review
Board:
Justin Rodriguez – to be appointed for a three year term starting the date of City Council advice and
consent and ending on September 2, 2024.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Wally Cromar called in to express his concern regarding the amount of AirBnBs. He lives in
District Five and has noticed an increase in the amount of homes that are purchaced and then
turned around and used for short-term rentals.Wally believes this is a problem because they're
6/9/2021 8:47 John Doe taking homes off the market for people to purchase. Affordable Housing
The city seems to be involved in a plethora of issues all requiring budgets. Many appear to be
nonessential in a setting of limited moneys. Basic services seem to be secondary in importance.A
visible example of this is the great number of potholes in our roads. If you drive our district you
won't be able to avoid them.They are everywhere. I have spoken to some of the good men who
fix them.They are consistently shorted of the resources needed to stay on top of potholes.
Touchy feely endeavors can be good, but not at the expense of basic services that impact all of
us. Please fund the streets department adequately.Or create a wheel alignment service every
6/9/2021 8:57 Boyd Vogeler driver can take advantage of.Sent from my iPhone FY21 Budget
Subject: (EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2021-00472 I wish to complain about having a hideous electrical
box outside my front door.This should have been installed in the alley behind the houses, please Small Cell Wireless
6/9/2021 13:21 Paul Jerominski stop this atrocity happening in our nice neighborhood.Thank you Paul Jerominski Facilities
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 1
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
..James Rogers,Thank you, I will follow up with the Senator and Representative.The following is
an email I sent to the Mayor. I thought you might be interested in my thoughts on homelessness
in District 1: Housing first, new alcohol law, bus ticket or van driven, breaking up homeless
camps, length of occupancy,traveling psychiatrist,traveling therapist,education, recruitment
van, no contact with past homeless acquaintances and job integration are some ideas I've been
thinking about. I understand some of these ideas are not new and they have been proven to
work. Other ideas are new and might need to be implemented constantly to see expedited and
continuous progressive results.Which is basically someone hired and trained by the city to do
their job. Housing first is a great place to start if implemented correctly. I'm sure you're familiar
with AA and other drug and alcohol treatment programs. One of the problems with some of
these programs is when they have clients or participants associating with each other beyond a
certain point. Everyone needs a thinking chair. People call this space different things, but
everyone needs a space where no one will disturb them long enough to come to the realization
of the different thoughts in their head. I would not put homeless people in the same building. I
would find a home for every individual or family and place them in a different location. Experts
say you are the equivalent of your five closest friends. It would be hard to grow fast if four of the
closest people you know are homeless and broke. Like crabs pulling each other back into the
bucket(homelessness),who never need a lid. It would be almost impossible to grow if they see
their fellow homeless pals daily. Getting the housed ready to maintain and thrive in their new
position.The traveling psychiatrist and therapist can make their rounds to the different homes
healing the minds of the homeless.They can schedule and travel like a delivery route would,
6/9/2021 23:38 Michael Waldron reducing driving time and fuel consumption.*Continued 1/3* Homelessness
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 2
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
*Continued 2/3*There would be a dispatch that would monitor time,distance, and location.Job
integration would work on sealing or clearing up their criminal background report,significantly
improving their credit score,and giving them a job.The city must contract with companies to
immediately put the now housed to work. Education is key,once individuals are given a home,
their education begins.Wealth building strategies,facts about alcohol and drugs. How to build
healthy relationships. It should be mandatory they must watch 1-2 hours(via internet)of this
education five days a week.The idea is to take the hand of God and reach down into the depths
of one's soul and lift them to a safe and healthy environment while nurturing them to become a
healthy productive citizen once again. Instilling in the minds of the homeless they can,and giving
them the opportunity to,achieve anything they want in life, must resonate in the minds of all.
The constant push to eliminate the homeless.The recruitment van picks up homeless people
daily. Maybe the van can hand out free treats,flyers,the promise of a house,etc..The homeless
are screened on how long they have lived in Utah,a little background on their situation,and
determining if they are from here or how long they have lived here.Word travels fast in the
homeless community.The questioning would need to be done very carefully.The questioning
would need to be about their story and within the questioning or story,determine if the
homeless person came from a different city or has been here for some time. Depending on the
story, if they traveled here from another city,we send them back via bus ticket or van.There
needs to be a clear message that Salt Lake City does not help every homeless person in the
United States. If the homeless have been in Salt Lake County for quite some time,then they
should receive help.The process of breaking up homeless camps should be done every two
weeks. If programs are available for new recruits,we do not want to make being homeless
comfortable for the homeless.There should be an alcohol law passed that states: "Only people
who have a residency will be able to purchase alcohol."The residency can be from anywhere in
Michael Waldron the U.S..This law would help prevent the homeless from purchasing alcohol.
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 3
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
*Continued 3/3*This is not full proof, but it's to help wake up the homeless and give them more
time to think about that recruitment van that comes by. I hope this helps in the process of
lowering the homeless population. If you have any questions about any of these ideas, please
email me back.Thank you, Michael Waldron James Rogers, I appreciate you forwarding my email
to UDOT. I understand there are policies and procedures in place to identify areas that would
benefit from a sound wall. I kept wondering why the little league baseball field was not being
used very often at the West Pointe Park. It didn't take much time to realize that I couldn't hear
my wife's voice from twenty feet away,and there was my answer. How can you teach a team to
play baseball when they can't hear what you're saying?A park that was ill designed before
construction began. I'm not here to point blame at the City, Ivry Homes, UDOT,or anyone else,
rather I would like to focus on the solution to the many problems related to the lack of a sound
wall in this community. I know a lot of people who suffer from asthma and sleep apnea who live
in close proximity to the freeway. I believe the homes closest to the freeway are within 200 feet
and the db rating is well above 67. If I understand correctly,this allows cities/UDOT to receive
federal aid from the government through the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970. It is a shame that
the homes closest to the freeway are not able to use their backyards in the way other homes
further away are able to. I see a lot of people's homes who are against the freeway not using
their backyards at all.They barbeque in the front, hang out in the front,and even the children
are forced to play in the front due to the pollution. I understand this may take a big push,a
multifacet approach with pressure from different parties. I hope I can count on your support to
have a sound wall built in the West Pointe community.What are your thoughts on building a
sound wall along 1-215 on the east side of the freeway from 700 N.to 2100 N. in the West Pointe
community? Does James Rogers think building a sound wall is a good investment to the
Michael Waldron community?Thank you, Michael Waldron
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 4
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Hello, I have a "Non essential"yoga business in SH on 1100 E and buying the building. I managed
to stay in business. I want to keep my property taxes even lower, not higher. I prefer
maintenance on what we have. Not creating more stuff for future tax increases.Water,sewer,
roads, pothole repairs and even new pavement on roads. Keeping infrastructure current. I still
have wind damage city trees with broken branches ready to fall on cars in my parking lot.This is
an example of not being able to take care of what we already have. If you must throw money at
something how about more pickleball courts. Fairmont Park has room for 2 more.Thanks Greg
6/10/2021 9:46 Greg Airhart Airhart Sent from my iPhone On Jun 9, FY22 Budget
Hi there, I work at Cotopaxi downtown and am frequently intimidated and scared by the
homeless population while walking into our office. I've seen illegal drug use in recent weeks and I
believe the situation has escalated since downtown had been quieter during covid. Please help
us feel safe in public spaces of SLC! We need more policing and regulation of these groups.Thank
6/10/2021 15:50 Julie Hirsch you Julie Hirsch Homelessness
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 5
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Council Member Fowler,Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed city
budget.After reviewing the documents, I have just a few comments: 1.The Mayor's Office is
experiencing excessive bureaucratic growth and you should vote against that.A 20%+budget
increase is a bad indicator and we definitely do not need more"senior staff"on the city payroll. If
she wants more staff,she should bring funding offsets from her office to pay for it. 2.The surge
in violent and property crimes needs to be reversed.The only effective and direct solution is
more and better policing,so please spend more there.A budget neutral action city leaders
should also take is to stop vilifying our city police force.The Mayor,without evidence, has
declared our police systemically racist.That emboldens criminals, makes police less effective,and
our community less safe. Empowering police and standing against criminals that victimize our
city and residents is a great place to start. 3.The criminal vagrancy problem remains bad and
getting worse,so please spend more money there. It gets cold every winter,so allowing the
"shelter resistant"to summer in the parks and have a crisis every winter is not effective policy,
planning,or use of resources.As we discussed in your office 3+years ago,there are full-time,
resident homesteaders in Sugarhouse Park.Same ones.Still there.A budget free action to
immediately improve the city is to reverse the sanctuary policy of allowing our public spaces to
become the chosen lifestyle option of the troubled and those who just opt out of our shelter
support services. I've been a resident of SLC for almost 20 years.Things are definitely getting
worse in the city, not better.While the budget is essential to fund city priorities and services,
there are a number of better policy choices that would immediately halt the city's recent, but
unmistakable decline.SF,Seattle, Portland, LA,and Austin are excellent models of what Salt Lake
City must work to avoid becoming.Thank you for soliciting the input.Ted Frederick Resident,
6/11/2021 8:25 Ted Frederick District 7 FY22 Budget
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 6
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
James rogers is out to lunch thinking parks should not become a department.They have the
biggest job in the city!Save that extra money it will cost by getting rid of economic development
and sustanibility.They have no corporate function other than feel good nonsense. Parks has a
Anonymous huge function and has to manage tons of land. BTW, make all the park strips parks so they can
6/11/2021 17:27 Constituent close at 11.Just saying. FY21 Budget
it is surprising this needs to be said,again and again and again but the city needs to defund the
police. i think city councils are in service to fascism because I should not have to hope that a
group of people see the obvious problem with giving murderers millions of dollars to continue
murdering people.the money needs to go to the library, parks, UTA.anywhere BUT the police. i
hate the city council and dont see your value. but since I have the ability to tell you that you
Anonymous need to not give the police department an iota of cents.the police, like the city council, bring no
6/11/2021 17:43 Constituent value to the city or people's lives defund the police FY21 Budget
I have lived at my property for over 20 years and every year since I have been told there is no
funding for alley repair/upkeep.The alleys are your property and your responsibity to maintain.
Currently you are in a budget session where funding for alley repair is possible. Please stop being
6/11/2021 19:22 Scott Weaver the alley slum lords that you are.Thanks FY21 Budget
Basic infrastructure has been ignored—please accelerate street reconstruction and repair
6/11/2021 20:44 Rob Thompson without sacrificing public safety. FY21 Budget
Hi-I was disappointed to see the Mayor's recommendation to increase police funding. I see that
the explanation for this is to have necessary staff to respond to calls for service in a timely
manner.The police are being asked to do too much and the emphasis should be to shift to
reducing their involvement in situations where they are not needed or helpful.This explanation
suggests we need to keep funding at the current levels to keep things how they are, but they are
not working as things are. I am in favor of reducing funding and reallocating that funding to
6/11/2021 22:24 Drew Trafton different places like mental health. FY21 Budget
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 7
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Dear City Council, I am asking that you substantially increase the budget for our Police
Department.We are tired of living in an ever increasingly dangerous city. I am happy to pay more
in taxes to keep our streets safe. On April 10th my friend was stabbed, unprovoked, in broad
daylight on Main St. downtown and almost died. Enough is enough. I undstand that this city
council has an antagonistic streak when it comes to our Police and that now we are paying dearly
in crime for it. It's time to reverse this trend.This city has become a very dangerous place to live.
6/12/2021 0:06 Ira Hinckley Please take some substantive actions to make our streets safe again. Ira Hinckley FY21 Budget
Please allow plenty of funding for our overworked and under-appreciated police dept. Please
Anonymous designate plenty of funding for the acquisition of land for parks&open space.That's the main
6/12/2021 8:09 Constituent contributor ro quality of life in Salt Lake City. FY21 Budget
Water costs are becoming exorbitant for myself and my neighbors.The proposed water price
hike is inequitable due to differing water charges across different municipalities in Utah and in
light of upcoming federal infrastructure assistance and investment. If SLC government. intends
for residents to let their lawns and foliage turn to zero scape,then this price hike will start that
transition.As a homeowner, I feel there are better solutions. Please reconsider this onerous tax
6/12/2021 23:53 Chris Orrock hike. FY21 Budget
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 8
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Dear City Council: I write to voice my support for the proposed FY21-22 budget of$83,370,502
for the Salt Lake City Police Department.The perception of Salt Lake City to be a safe and
welcoming destination is critical to the successful recovery from the ravages that the pandemic
imposed on our tourism and business travel industries.Additionally,the well-publicized scarcity
of hospitality workforce means that any hotel or restaurant employee has a clear opportunity to
work either in downtown or in a suburb that is perceived to be safer during their commute on
public transportation,while walking between their vehicle and their employer,or even in the
workplace itself.A couple of weeks ago,our overnight desk agent reported to me that a group of
"suspicious-acting"guests had checked into the hotel.Once they had left the front desk,the
agent went online and discovered that two members of the party had outstanding felony
warrants.One of them was indicated to be on the states"most wanted" list.She called police
dispatch and was informed that"unless they are causing any trouble"the police would not take
action. It is difficult to determine what"causing trouble"should be interpreted to mean.
Apparent prostitution? Drug activity? Human trafficking?Where do we draw the line?Increasing
violent crime is undermining businesses and property owners'efforts to create a vibrant city and
reactivate Salt Lake's economy. If our Central Business District deteriorates,so will the City's sales
tax base.We need a strong downtown economy to support vital services across the City. Please
fund the police staffing and programs needed to deter crime and keep Salt Lake City safe. Ric
Tanner General Manager Kimpton Hotel Monaco
6/15/2021 10:46 Ric Tanner Police Funding
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 9
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Dear Council,Over the past year and a half, I have proactively voiced my concern to the city
council and SLC trails committee that the master plan for the SLC foothills neglects the wildlife,
beauty,and design of the existing trail system. Rather ran improving on the current trails,the
plan destroys the beauty we all seek in the foothills by infilling trails between existing trails and
cutting through the vegetation.As a civil engineer who works daily with geomaterials, I am
familiar with the soils the existing plan built through in Phase 1. Morris Meadow is a prime
example of the poor design and poor understanding of the soils in the foothills by the design
firm. Later phases of the existing plan call for placing major switchbacks on the faces of Mt Wire
and Mt Van Cott,two of the pinnacle peaks towering above Salt Lake City. If these trails are
constructed with the current plan the switchbacks will permanently scar the mountain faces and
will be the backdrop for SLC forever.Additionally,the plan calls for the trails to be graded to
permit mountain bikes to the summit.This will only result in additional downhill mountain bike
scarring caused by social trails down the face of the peaks. I understand the city has frozen the
existing construction until this fall but is soliciting for Phase 2 construction at the moment. I
believe this is a shortsighted view.The current plan has shown major flaws in Phase 1. It is clear
the current design did not adequately consult foot users for the project design. I am asking that
you freeze the project and open the design up for feedback from the entire user community Foothills Trail System
6/15/2021 12:07 Mike Johnson given the pore implementation and learnings taken from Phase 1.Thank you, Eric Edelman Master Plan
Dear Councilmembers,Thank you for your service to our City. I have spoken at the past two
public hearings about the new trails that sadly were built quickly and not in line with the goals of
the master plan.Attached are three documents that support slowing down the process until we
can learn from what has been done and do better in the next two phases.As I write this,trails
crews are busy realigning one of the new trails in City Creek Canyon.A mistake on the first go? It
is an expensive process that needs oversight.Thank you, Beverley Cooper Beverley Cooper 801-
May I live this day Compassionate of heart,Clear in word,Gracious in awareness, Foothills Trail System
6/15/2021 12:08 Beverley Cooper Courageous in thought,Generous in love.John O'Donohue Master Plan
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 10
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
Dear Salt Lake City Council Members,June 15,2021 I am writing to express my deep concern
over some of the trail work that has recently taken place in the foothills above City Creek Canyon
and the Avenues neighborhood. I will focus on just one significant aspect,although there are
other serious problems with the trail work so far. I hike almost every day in the foothills with my
dog. My usual go to is at the top of Terrace Hills Drive.The Terrace Hills West trail goes up a
switchback and then onto a wide ridge,an old jeep trail,to head to the upper City Creek Saddle
or onto a contour trail to Terrace Hills East, also a wide trail.These wide trails serve a very
important function in the trails system because they act as collectors from higher and narrower
trails and comfortably accommodate a mix of users; hikers,trail runners,dog walkers and
mountain bikers with minimal conflict.A couple of months ago when I came upon the new trails I
admit I was a little shocked at their extent. But then,when I learned that the plan was to close
the existing wide multiuse trail up the Terrace Hills West ridge and send ALL of the foot and bike
traffic on a new single track cut into hillside on a contour below the ridge, I was aghast.What
worked well for all users, hikers and bikers,was to be eliminated and everyone would be forced Foothills Trail System
6/15/2021 12:10 Roger Borgenicht onto a new,single track piece of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail *Contiuned 1/2* Master Plan
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 11
Public Comments 06.09.2021-06.15.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment Topic
*Continuted 2/2*A few years ago at the beginning of the dramatic increase in mountain bike
activity there were some hard feelings and sometimes tension on the trails between hikers and
bikers.The wide trails on the east and west of Terrace Hills trailhead allow cooperative shared
use much better than a single track(and helped immensely in the past year with Covid where
people could easily social distance from one side of the trail to the other). I believe the lack of
stress or tension on the wider trails and the interaction with all trail users on them contribute to
what I've experienced as an increase in common trail courtesy. I want to point out that the ill-
conceived proposed closing of Terrace Hills West ridge trail was done with 30-foot long pole
fences and 3-foot deep trenches dug crossways across the ridge trail, an incredibly heavy handed
method to message trail behavior. Never have I seen such an imposing method used. Lastly,the
Foothills Master Plan uses social trails as a derogatory term but I think it is the opposite.The
existing trails are there because that's where people wanted to explore.Our goal should be to
protect existing social trails that have been there for decades and discourage or prevent spider
trails.This will protect the hillside habitat for the flora and fauna that share our wonderful
foothills.Thank you for your consideration of revisiting the Trails Master Plan, restoring closed
Roger Borgenicht trails and repairing mistakes made. Roger Borgenicht
1:21 PM 6/15/2021 Page 12