06/10/2021 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
WORK SESSION ONLY
June 10, 2021 Thursday 3:00 PM
This Meeting Will be an Electronic Meeting Pursuant to the Chair’s
Determination.
SLCCouncil.com
No Formal Meeting
Please note: A general public comment period will not be held this day. This is the Council's monthly scheduled
briefing meeting. Item start times and durations are approximate and are subject to change at the Chair’s discretion.
Welcome and public meeting rules
The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters. The public is welcome to listen. Items
scheduled on the Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and / or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting
based on circumstance or availability of speakers.
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. Item start times
and durations are approximate and are subject to change at the Chair’s discretion.
Generated: 15:31:41
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the
Chair’s determination.
As Salt Lake City Council Chair, I hereby determine that conducting the Salt Lake City
Council meeting at an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the health and safety
of those who may be present, and that the City and County building has been ordered
closed to the public for health and safety reasons.
Members of the public are encouraged to participate in meetings. We want to make sure
everyone interested in the City Council meetings can still access the meetings how they
feel most comfortable. If you are interested in watching the City Council meetings, they
are available on the following platforms:
•Facebook Live: www.facebook.com/slcCouncil/
•YouTube: www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
•Web Agenda: www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
•SLCtv Channel 17 Live: www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
As always, if you would like to provide feedback or comment, please call us or send us an
email:
•24-Hour comment line: 801-535-7654
•council.comments@slcgov.com
More info and resources can be found at: www.slc.gov/council/contact-us/
Upcoming meetings and meeting information can be found
here: www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
We welcome and encourage your comments! We have Council staff monitoring inboxes
and voicemail, as always, to receive and share your comments with Council Members. All
agenda-related and general comments received in the Council office are shared with the
Council Members and added to the public meeting record. View comments by visiting the
Council Virtual Meeting Comments page.
Work Session Items
1.Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget: Unresolved Issues Follow-up ~ 3:00 p.m.
120 min.
The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about unresolved issues relating to the
proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Unresolved issues are follow-up items to any
questions or requests that Council Members have raised during the Department budget
briefings.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 1, 2021; Thursday, June 3, 2021; Tuesday, June 8, 2021; and
Thursday, June 10, 2021
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and Tuesday, June 1,
2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Standing Items
2.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
3.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and
announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.
4.Tentative Closed Session
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health
of an individual;
b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i) public discussion of the transaction would:
(A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
(ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and
(iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements
of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m. on _____________________, the undersigned, duly appointed City
Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL BUDGET
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
www.slccouncil.com/city-budget
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Ben Luedtke, Lehua Weaver
Allison Rowland, Sam Owen, Sylvia Richards and Libby Stockstill
DATE:June 10, 2021
RE:UNRESOLVED BUDGET ISSUES
The Council reviewed this information on Tuesday, June 1st, June 3rd and June 8th, and
received additional information from the Administration. The Council indicated initial
items of interest and conducted straw polls. See attached for the spreadsheet reflecting
straw polls as of the end of that discussion. Staff has recorded the Council’s preferences and
updated a ‘balancing spreadsheet.’ Staff will be prepared to do this again in real time on
June 10th so that the Council and public can see the impacts of the tentative decisions. There
may be additional information based on ongoing compensation discussions.
Additional information:
1.Revenue
a. Property Tax
i. Judgement levy – County information clarified that the Council can adopt
an additional $43,697.
ii. Property Tax New Growth – As of the printing of this staff report, Council
Staff does not have updated information on the exact amount of property
tax new growth. If it is higher than the Mayor’s recommended budget, the
Council will be able to use those dollars in budget deliberations. If it is
lower the Council will need to re-balance the budget or consider revenue
increases. (Note: By state law the tax commission is required to transmit this
information by June 8th.) Currently expenses exceed revenue by
$413,461.
b.Impact Fee Reimbursement: The General Fund fronted investments in capital
projects for police. The City’s Impact Fee Plan recognizes this past investment of
$1.8 million. The proposal is to reimburse the General Fund for those past
investments with existing police impact fees. This approach is contemplated in the
City’s Impact Fee Plan and allowed by state law. While this is one-time money, it
Project Timeline:
Briefing: June 10, 2021
Budget Hearing: May 18, June
1, 2021
Potential Action: June 15, 2021
2
provided the Council additional flexibility that was not available when the Mayor
transmitted the budget.
c. Fund balance – This assumes a starting point as recommended in the Mayor’s
Recommended budget, appropriating $4.9 million from fund balance which leaves
it at 13.89%. It is a Council legislative intent/goal to keep 14% fund balance,
although that was an increase from the previous year of 13%. There is no legal
stipulation that you should stay above 13% although bond counsel has advised
that it’s a good idea not to continually erode fund balance (rating agencies could
penalize the city for that).
i. Straw polls include allocating fund balance freed up by Council adoption of
Budget Amendment Number 9 (reimbursing bonuses with ARPA dollars
instead of General Fund dollars). This freed up $1.2 million for the Council
to spend without impacting the fund balance level proposed by the Mayor.
While this is one-time money, it provided the Council additional flexibility
that was not available when the Mayor transmitted the budget.
ii.Previously staff was advised that 10% was the level at which rating
agencies noted. Staff note: the higher the City’s credit rating is, the lower
the cost is for the City to borrow.
2.Expenses
a. Additional information on labor negotiations may be available at the June 10th
meeting.
b. Clarification on Mayor’s Equity Office structure: The proposed budget includes moving
three positions from other Departments into the Mayor's office to focus on Diversity,
Equity, and Inclusion work. The new team will work under the Equity Officer and
include four existing positions. If the Council is supportive, the staffing document
would change the names of these various positions to Equity Team Member while the
Mayor’s Office sorts out the organizational structure of the Equity Office. Straw poll:
Would the Council be supportive of the proposed changes? Would the Council also
support the positions being posted prior to July 1?
c. The Economic Development Department provided more information in writing
about the Tech Lake City initiative which was forwarded to Council Member
separately.
d. The Council may wish to evaluate expense items once property tax numbers are
final and the amount out of balance is more certain. Currently expenses exceed
revenue by $413,461.
Proposed Contingent Appropriations (these would appear in the
1.Diversification of public safety response – Set aside $2 million from Funding our Future,
public safety category, in a holding account for later appropriation, pending discussion with the
Administration about the feasibility of establishing community enforcement and support
approaches that enhance community safety and reduce the dependence on sworn police officers
for duties that fall outside of their scope.
2.Conditional appropriation about future dollars spent on foothill trails – condition any
current or future budget for trails that no dollars are spent until the public review period is over
and the Council has been briefed/approves of future plans
3
3.Conditional appropriation for ARPA dollars – set aside $1,583,500 million in a holding
account in non-departmental for future appropriation once federal guidelines are officially
finalized and programs/proposals can be tailored to meet those guidelines, including for
potential future CIP discussions and reimbursements for eligible expenses the City already
incurred
4.Continued Contingency for All Funding Our Future -- Sales Tax Funds (this has been
adopted each year since the City implemented the sales tax). The Council approves Funding
Our Future sales tax revenue appropriations with the following conditions:
a. Expenditure of Funding Our Future Sales Tax Funds. Funding our Future funds may not
be expended unless the department or division expending the funds complies with:
i. Utah Fiscal Procedures Act
ii. The City’s Procurement Code and Rules
iii. Written verification from the City Attorney and City Finance Director that
proper legal and financial procedures have been followed.
b. Other Funding Our Future Budget Contingencies:
i. The Administration providing a written semiannual spending, implementation
and outcomes report on each of the four critical need areas.
ii. Tracking funding for Fleet provided through the Funding our Future tax
separately to ensure it is spent only on public safety (police, fire, dispatch).
iii. The Administration spending funds in the four critical need areas as adopted in
the attached key changes spreadsheet.
iv. The Administration bringing back to the Council any proposed adjustments to
the adopted budget in a budget amendment for re-appropriation before changes
are made.
v. The Administration maintaining and regularly updating a publicly available
dashboard reflecting revenues received and actual uses.
vi. In FY21 and all future funding requests, providing a label denoting which line
items are funded with this Funding Our Future sales tax funds.
vii. For all positions added, the Administration shall submit an annual written
review along with the Mayor’s Recommended Budget to ensure that each
position continues to serve the critical need areas and, if a Council work session
briefing is scheduled, provide a presentation of the report.
c.New Contingent Appropriation - Small Business Outreach and Support. Allocation
of $100,000 from the general fund to the Department of Economic Development’s
small business outreach and support program during the City’s major capital projects
[OR major road projects] is contingent on the Administration determining by August
31, 2021 whether the program is eligible for ARPA funding. If the program does qualify
for ARPA, those Federal funds would replace a total of $200,000 general fund dollars,
including the additional $100,000 which was approved in this budget to ensure that the
program could begin its work immediately.
Proposed New Legislative Intents, Fiscal Year 2022
a.Update Boarded-Building Fee. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration
propose a boarded building fee that includes the full city costs of monitoring and
responding by police, fire and other city departments at these properties.
4
b.Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation. It is the intent of the Council that the
Administration provide their strategy for evaluating whether to expand the Trips-to-
Transit program, which will begin to serve west side neighborhoods in late 2021, to other
areas of the City.
c.Golf Fund Update. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide
information on the following items in anticipation of a work session briefing to review
and discuss options for the Golf Fund.
o Golf Fund Financial Sustainability: Trends in revenues, expenditures,
o Long-term CIP Plans. Based on current projections and the recently-completed
short-term CIP plan,
o Golf Food and Beverage Options. A review of the specific open space zoning
ordinances, with the goal of removing barriers to providing additional food and
beverage options in golf courses. To the extent that barriers exist in State law the
Council requests an analysis of those, and that changing them be identified as a
future legislative priority.
d.Expanded Funding Our Future Definition. It is the intent of the Council that the
definition of “public safety” for allocation of Funding Our Future revenue include not only
the Police Department, Fire Department, and 911 Dispatch, but also any social workers
and non-emergency traffic enforcement programs which are designed to expand the
City’s public safety alternative response model. (Note: The current definition included Fire
and 911 Dispatch since FY2020.)
e.Public Lands Maintenance. It is the intent of the Council that the Administration provide
an estimate of the funding that would be needed to adequately maintain all of the City's
public lands. This estimate should include the number of FTEs, as well as supplies,
equipment, and appropriate signage.
f.Small Business Support. It is the intent of the Council to include funding for a small
business support program within all major road projects.
OR
It is the intent of the Council to include funding for a small business support program
within all major capital projects that have the potential to impact businesses.
RDA RELATED LEGISLATIVE INTENTS:
g.Energy Efficiency as a Condition of any RDA Project Loans and Investments. It is the
intent of the Council/Board that all RDA project loans and investments require certain
energy efficiency standards be met as a condition of funding by January 1, 2022. The
Council/Board may wish to designate specific energy efficiency or sustainability
standards, such as those set out by LEED and other accrediting organizations. (See
examples at https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/green-building-standards.)
5
h.Structure of Accounts within RDA, including Fund Balances and Previous Capital
Projects. It is the intent of the Council/Board to review the full structure of RDA accounts
with RDA and Finance Staff, including fund balances and capital projects funded in
previous years. The Board may wish to discuss with the RDA and Finance staff the best
way to get this information on a real-time basis. Staff note: The City’s Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) effort will help in tracking/providing this information in a less labor-
intensive way, although the horizon for full implementation could be a year or longer.
The following information was provided for the Council’s June 1st and 3rd discussions. It is
provided again for reference.
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
Staff has kept a list of items that one or more Council Members have raised as potential changes to the Mayor’s
Recommended budget. It should be noted that this is a staff-generated draft, reflecting Council questions and
discussions as of the date of its printing. It may be updated prior to the work session discussion, and Council
Members may have changes or corrections to individual items.
If a budget impact is apparent, that amount has been listed, or noted as “to be determined.” Depending on
Council feedback, adjustments can be made to the overall key changes document, so that the Council can track
the net effect of these decisions on the overall budget.
Changes to the budget may cause it to be out of balance (increase or decrease expenses and revenues). As these
changes occur, the Council would need to identify offsetting revenue enhancements or expense reductions to
bring the budget back in balance. Staff can research and provide other revenue generation or expense cutting
options if the Council is interested.
(Note: this list is not comprehensive – please let staff know if there are other items to add)
General Follow-up Items/Themes
1.ARPA funding guidance - After receiving guidance from the US Treasury, the Administration
has advised that the funds are much more restrictive than what is proposed in the Mayor’s
recommended budget. In general all funds have to be specifically tied to recovering from the
effects of the pandemic. The Administration provided information about which of the proposed
uses are eligible, which are eligible with adjustments, and which are not eligible. Each of these
is noted in the attached spreadsheet.
a. In the absence of clear alternative uses for ARPA dollars, the Council could place the
remaining unspent dollars in a holding account for future allocation once eligible
uses are identified. The Council may also ask the Administration to review all CIP
projects for ARPA eligibility.
b. The Council may wish to hold a policy discussion with the Administration about policy
goals for potential future federal funding (ARPA dollars or potential future
infrastructure dollars), and if there are specific areas of the City budget the Council
would like to target.
c. Staff is checking with the Attorney’s office and Administration about using ARPA
dollars for issues the Council has identified as a priority.
d.Position by position review:
6
i.The Council may wish to review the positions that are not eligible and decide
whether to include them in the general fund (if revenues permit).
ii.The Council may wish to review the positions/programs that are eligible if
changes to the scope of the positions/programs are made, and decide whether
those changes are consistent with Council goals and are practical to implement.
iii.The Council may wish to review the positions that are eligible and identify
support.
iv. For the positions that the Council supports, the Council may wish to specify
whether their expectation is that those be recorded in the City’s financial system
as temporary grant positions, or as regular employees.
2.Public Safety service delivery – the Council has supported a variety of ideas that go along
with diversifying public safety response and enhancing accountability and transparency in
policing. It should be noted that all of these ideas are subject to identifying available resources.
The detailed ideas are listed in the attached spreadsheet, but in general this includes:
•Support for more social workers
•Support for a civilian community service office (holding account with details TBD)
•Support for increasing mental health resources for first responders, including dispatch
•Support for equipment and/or staff to enhance transparency with body cameras.
3.Investment in Capital Improvements for constituents – The Council has expressed an
interest in increasing funding for the CIP fund so that additional constituent projects that are
not currently recommended for funding, can be addressed. Council Members have indicated
that their interest is particularly due to the City not accepting constituent projects in FY 21.
This idea is subject to identifying available resources.
a.Council Members have asked about increasing the CIP fund to the traditional 7% level.
If the Council wanted to increase the funding for CIP to 7% level, it would need to
identify $2,775,049 in revenue. (Depending on eventual usage in CIP, sources could
include General Fund, Funding our Future, County transportation funds, Transportation
holding account)
b.An alternative idea is to allocate specific amounts sufficient to fund specific projects.
4.Compensation – some Council Members have expressed an interest in increasing
compensation for employees beyond the Administration's proposed 1% increase. This idea is
subject to identifying available resources.
a. If the Council wanted to increase compensation for employees by 1% across the board,
it would require identifying $1.7 million in the general fund ($1.1million for
represented units) and $1.1 million in other funds.
b. This would not necessarily adjust the City’s general approach to compensate to “95% of
market” – the Council could adjust that pending available resources.
c. Staff can provide amounts for specific employee units of the City if the Council is
interested.
7
d.Council Members also discussed adjusting the City’s policy of compensating at 95% of
market.
5.New Positions – some Council Members expressed an interest in considering proposed new
positions in more detail. Each new position is listed in the attached spreadsheet under the
proposed department. Note: While most positions are funded for less than a full year to reflect
the time it takes to actually hire an employee, there are a few that are proposed for a full year
of funding. The Council could consider adjusting those budget amounts to reflect the realities
of the hiring process. Alternately, the Council could authorize advertising for new positions to
begin before the fiscal year begins.
6.Department Reorganizations – some Council Members expressed an interest in taking more
time to consider department reorganizations. To the extent that any new FTEs are proposed
either as a part of reorganizations or in general, those are in the attached spreadsheet.
7.Funding source options - Staff has identified the following potential funding sources for
Council discussion/consideration, potentially to address some of the above ideas (these are
included on the attached spreadsheet):
a.Potential additional revenue (pending information from Tax Commission and follow up
from the Administration)
i.Actual New Growth
ii.Actual Judgement levy
iii.Revenue loss replacement from ARPA - (potentially more than $10m is eligible)
b. Funds included in the MRB that are not needed
i. Election expenses - $187k
ii. Interest expense (not doing a tax anticipation note this year) - $350k
iii. Body cam one-time dollars - $93k
c. Fund balances available
i. Funding our future fund balance available - $200k from FY 20, $1.9m fry FY 21
(above 14%) - note: this is one-time $
ii. General fund balance available if BA #9 ARPA dollars are adopted - $1.2m -
note: this is one-time $
iii. North Temple Viaduct CRA debt service overage – TBD - note: this is one-time
$
d. Holding accounts available
i. Transportation holding account - $1.8m - note: this is one-time $
ii. Holding account for underserved communities (CIP?) - $669,138 - note: this is
one-time $
Potential conditional appropriations
5. Diversification of public safety response – Set aside $_______ from _______ in a holding
account for later appropriation, pending discussion with the Administration about the feasibility
of establishing community enforcement and support approaches that enhance community safety
and reduce the dependence on sworn police officers for duties that fall outside of their scope.
8
6. Conditional appropriation about future dollars spent on foothill trails – condition any current or
future budget for trails that no dollars are spent until the public review period is over and the
Council has been briefed/approves of future plans
7.Continued Contingency for All Funding Our Future -- Sales Tax Funds (this has been
adopted each year since the City implemented the sales tax). The Council approves Funding
Our Future sales tax revenue appropriations with the following conditions:
a. Expenditure of Funding Our Future Sales Tax Funds. Funding our Future funds may not be
expended unless the department or division expending the funds complies with:
i. Utah Fiscal Procedures Act
ii. The City’s Procurement Code and Rules
iii. Written verification from the City Attorney and City Finance Director that proper
legal and financial procedures have been followed.
b. Other Funding Our Future Budget Contingencies:
i. The Administration providing a written semiannual spending, implementation and
outcomes report on each of the four critical need areas.
ii. Tracking funding for Fleet provided through the Funding our Future tax separately
to ensure it is spent only on public safety (police, fire, dispatch).
iii. The Administration spending funds in the four critical need areas as adopted in the
attached key changes spreadsheet.
iv. The Administration bringing back to the Council any proposed adjustments to the
adopted budget in a budget amendment for re-appropriation before changes are made.
v. The Administration maintaining and regularly updating a publicly available
dashboard reflecting revenues received and actual uses.
vi. In FY21 and all future funding requests, providing a label denoting which line items
are funded with this Funding Our Future sales tax funds.
vii. For all positions added, the Administration shall submit an annual written review
along with the Mayor’s Recommended Budget to ensure that each position continues to serve
the critical need areas and, if a Council work session briefing is scheduled, provide a
presentation of the report.
Potential legislative intents
1.Update Boarded Building Fee.
2. Golf Fund Update. To include:
a.Golf Fund Financial Sustainability.
b.Long-term CIP Plans.
c. Golf Food and Beverage Options
3. Ongoing Expenses for Maintenance at City-Owned Parcels
4.Energy Efficiency as a Condition of RDA Project Loans and Investments.
5.RDA Structure of Accounts, including Fund Balances and Previous Capital Projects.
6. Trips to transit – evaluating for expansion in future areas. The Administration has provided
some additional information:
Measuring success: The Transit Master Plan identifies accessibility and cost effectiveness as the two
key goals for this program. The specific metrics to determine if we are meeting those goals could be
total ridership, as well as cost per rider. Here are the metrics being used by UTA for their Southwest
Salt Lake County Service:
9
Timeline: We anticipate that this service will launch between August and the end of 2021. After one
year, we will be able to do some initial evaluations, but it may take 2-3 years to fully understand the
impact and benefits of the service.
6/10/2021 **DRAFT - Representing Council Straw Polls on 6-3 ** 1:14 PM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
A B C D E F G H I J K
Net (449,111)$ -$ -$ -$
Amount Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses Revenue Expenses
Revenue Items
Actual New Growth Revenue TBD
Judgement Levy (if the actual amount is greater than the
proposed budget)43,697$ $43,697
Confirm property tax stabilization 1,000,000$
Capture funds not expended/encumbered from FY 2020 Funding
our Future 200,000$ 200,000$
Funding our future fund balance dollars over 14%1,929,483$ 1,929,483$
Capture funds swapped in BA #9 for ARPA dollars
(would increase usage of fund balance from $4.9 million to $6.1
milion)1,193,000$ 1,193,000$
Revenue replacement for ARPA
(potential to increase from MRB)1,432,646$ 1,432,646$
Use overage funds from North Temple Viaduct CDA account for
debt service - Transfer to RDA for N. Temple Strategic
Intervention 1,000,000$
Carry forward CIP dollars set aside for underserved communities
- Transfer to RDA for N. Temple Strategic Intervention 669,138$
CIP recapture 155,709$ 155,709$
Completed Class C funds 208,981$ 208,981$
Old CDBG projects 73,444$
Recapture Public Safety Impact Fees for future capacity needs
already built $ 1,898,497 1,898,497$
Expense Items
Total ARPA Expenses proposed in MRB 4,198,794$
Attorney's Office
NEW - City Prosecutors (10 months) - $89,350 each, 10 months
(Council question - reclassification?) $ 268,050
Straw poll - One new prosecutor ($89,350), reclassify others
($75k). Victim advocate matching funds remain funded. $ (103,700)(103,700)$
Community and Neighborhoods
NEW - CAN Deputy (10 months)158,750$
NEW - HAND office facilitator (revenue offset)
ARPA Funded:
Eligible - Special projects assistant focused on Community
Commitment Program (CCP)93,829$
Not eligible - Associate Planners (Funding for 3 - $78,333 each)235,000$ (235,000)$
Not eligible - Transportation Right of Way Utilization Mgr 160,000$ (160,000)$
Eligible - Youth and Family Community Program Mgr 90,633$
Eligible - Youth and Family Programming continuation 711,350$
Response to Council question re: enhancing ability to do long
term planning (not in MRB unless straw polled by Council)-
funding is for 10 months
Planning Manager 113,458$ 113,458$
3 Senior Planners 275,248$ 275,248$
3 Principal Planners 263,865$
1 Administrative Support Position 61,999$
operational budget 30,000$
Economic Development
ARPA Funded:
Not Eligible - 3 FTE - Arts Council Staffing $ 350,000 (350,000)$
Not Eligible - 1 FTE -Business & Cultural Districts $ 150,000 (150,000)$
Eligible - Economic Dev Strategic Plan (if focused on covid
recovery programs - more info needed) $ 50,000
Eligble - Economic Development Staff (if focused on recovery
efforts - more info needed) $ 290,000
Not Eligible - Tech Lake City $ 45,000 (45,000)$
Not Eligible - Construction Mitigation (need more info if
focused on small business recovery loans) - $100k available if no
ARPA dollars available $ 200,000 200,000$ (200,000)$
Finance
NEW - 1 FTE - Deputy Director (10 months) $ 143,603
NEW - 1 FTE - Business Analyst (full year) $ 89,500
ARPA Funded:
Eligible - 1 FTE Grant Administrator $ 101,020
Eligible - 1 FTE Grant Manager $ 95,000
Not Eligible - Amex Cart Merchant Fees $ 40,000 40,000$ (40,000)$
Not Eligible - Business Analyst $ 89,500 (89,500)$
Fire
Emergency Management "Phase 2" Positions
NEW - 1 Fire Captain $ 136,865
NEW - 1 Accountant $ 63,517
ARPA Funded:
Eligible -4 FTE - MRT Expansion (6 months) $ 136,762
Eligible - MRT Expansion Equipment (one-time) $ 46,700
Human Resources
NEW - HR Analyst to support ERP $ 111,075
NEW - HR Supervisor (10 Months) $ 136,865
NEW - 2 FTEs - HR Tech (10 Months) - $54,475 each/10 months $ 108,950
Police
NEW - staff to track legislated issues (10 months)60,833$
NEW - internal mental health resource (10 months) $ 100,000
NEW - 6 social workers (see non-dept for funding) - 3 @ 10
months, 3 @ 6 months
Additional social workers (SEE NON-DEPT)
Alternative response models (SEE NON-DEPT)
Body Camera technology (SEE NON-DEPT)
Public Services
Public Lands Department TBD
New department or keep in Public Services (estimated difference
between Department and Division is $45-$50k)
NEW - 1 FTE Deputy Director (10 months)134,316$
NEW - 1 FTE Community Partnership Coordinator (10 months)84,113$
NEW - 1 FTE Public Land Planner (10 months)95,327$
NEW - 1 FTE Finance Manager II (10 months)117,877$
NEW - 1 FTE Groundskeeper (10 months)convert from seasonal
NEW - 1 FTE Recreational Trail Manager (10 months)64,734$
NEW - 1 FTE Recreational Signage Coordinator (10 months)51,847$ (51,847)$
NEW - 1 FTE Trails and Natural Lands Technician (10 months)41,419$
Maintenance of new amenities 338,413$
Recapture 2 months of funding from any FTEs added TBD
ARPA Funded:
Not Eligible - Forest Preservation and Growth - 1 FTE and
ongoing equipment 219,000$ straw polled - no (219,000)$
Not Eligible - Forest Preservation and growth one-time 95,000$ straw polled - no (95,000)$
Recature Fireworks funding due to drought conditions 25,000$ (25,000)$
Additional help with special events permitting
Public Services Department
NEW - Engineer (9 Months)92,255$
NEW - 2 FTES - Landscape Architect (9 months)169,833$
NEW - 1 FTE Architect (9 months)88,477$
NEW - Engineering Informaton and Records Specialist (9
months)42,375$
NEW - 1 FTE Streets Response Team (FOF)53,300$
911 Communications (rename department)
NEW - 8 FTE Dispatchers (6 months) to implement 32 hr
workweek pilot (FOF) - increase to 10 months 153,450$ 127,875$
Council idea - add internal mental health FTE (10 months) $ 100,000
Non Departmental
recapture funds based on actual election expenses 183,327$ (133,327)$
recapture interest expense 350,000$ (350,000)$
Additional CIP dollars - funding sources are general fund, FOF,
County Transportation fund, Class B&C
to 7% level 2,775,049$ 2,775,049$
for specific community applications TBD
to CIP from Funding our Future - would have to be for FOF
eligible projects
Compensation holding amount 1,505,068$ 1,505,068$
recapture $1.8 million from transportation holding account to
fund street improvements on 600 North Corridor
Transformation 1,879,654$ 1,879,654$ 1,879,654$
ULCT - additional funding for ARPA assistance (one-time -TBD)20,000$ 20,000$
Legislative non-departmental - Citywide lobbyist 60,000$ 60,000$
Correct Arts Council Allocation 37,500$ 37,500$
Adjustments related to police reform and/or alternative
response models - only in budget if straw polled by Council:
Additional social workers (cost per month per social worker FTE
- Staff is confirming amount)9,375$
3 more social workers for 6 months 168,750$
6 more socail workers for 10 months *flexibility to adjust via
budget amendment* - using data to determine when co-
response is needed 562,500$ 562,500$
Allocation for potential lease expense or repair/remodel for
CCC space 200,000$ 200,000$
Civilian response model (TBD) - potential holding account for
further discussion with the Administration - including traffic
enforcement 2,000,000$ 2,001,608$
fund additional axon body camera services 349,692$ 349,692$
potential FTE or contract position to review body camera
footage and/or use of force incidents, support to PCRB - maybe
in HR
other FTEs as recommended that could be implemented from
Matrix audit
remove funding for body camera equipment from FY 21 (only
needed one-time)93,000$ (93,000)$
ARPA Funded:
Eligible - Apprenticeship Program (if focused on re-
employment)1,000,000$
Holding account for ARPA dollars pending further evaluatation
for eligibility in BA #1 1,583,500$
Other funds
Unresolved Issues Tracking General Fund Funding our Future ARPA Funding
CIP Funding (pending
need to track separately)