01/09/2024 - Meeting Materials
Board of Directors of the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
SALT LAKE CITY
REVISED AGENDA
January 9, 2024 Tuesday 2:00 PM
Council Work Room
451 South State Street, Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCRDA.com
In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance, the meeting may be held electronically. After 5:00
p.m., please enter the City & County Building through the main east entrance.
This is a discussion among RDA Board Directors and select presenters. The public is welcome to listen,
unless otherwise specified as a public comment period. Items scheduled may be moved and / or discussed
during a different portion of the Meeting based on circumstance or availability of speakers. Item start
times and durations are approximate and are subject to change at the Chair’s discretion.
Generated: 10:35:44
Comments:A.
1.General Comments to the Board ~2:00 p.m.
5 min
The RDA Board of Directors will receive public comments regarding Redevelopment
Agency business in the following formats:
1.Written comments submitted to RDA Board offices, 451 South State Street, Suite
304, P.O. Box 145476, Salt Lake City, UT. 84114-5476.
2.Comments to the RDA Board of Directors. (Comments are taken on any item not
scheduled for a public Hearing, as well as on any other RDA Business. Comments
are limited to two minutes.)
B.Public Hearing - individuals may speak to the Board once per public hearing
topic for two minutes, however written comments are always accepted:
NONE.
C.Redevelopment Agency Business - The RDA Board of Directors will receive
information and/or hold discussions and/or take action on:
1.Election of Chair and Vice Chair ~ 2:05 p.m.
20 min.
The Board will take a straw poll to nominate the Board Chair (proposed to be a one-year
term if the bylaws are amended as previously discussed) and Vice Chair (a one-year
term). The process includes expressions of interest from Board Members, nominations
for each position, and then voting each for the Chair and Vice Chair positions.
2.Utah Open Meetings Law Training ~ 2:25 p.m.
20 min.
The Board will receive a briefing from the City Attorney’s Office about the Utah Open
Meetings Law training. This briefing will serve as the annual training for both the Board
of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council.
3.RDA Audit Review and Approval for Fiscal Year 2022-23 ~ 2:45 p.m.
15 min.
The Board will review and consider approval of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 RDA Audit,
which shows the Agency's financial conditions as of June 30, 2023.
4.Resolution: USA Climbing National Training Center Ground Lease at
Approximately 310 South 500 West -
-
The Board will receive a briefing and consider approving a resolution that would
authorize the lease rate and terms for USA Climbing Headquarters and Training Facility
at Approximately 310 South 500 West. The development is envisioned to include
adaptive reuse of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company building, construction of a
primary building with multiple climbing walls, and a public outdoor plaza on the corner.
Related improvements could include a temporary surface parking lot if needed, a
permanent parking structure, utility upgrades, new streets, and reconstruction of
existing streets, among other potential projects.
5.Informational: City Creek Daylighting Design Plan Along the
Folsom Trail ~ 3:00 p.m.
20 min.
The Board will receive a briefing about updated designs to daylight (bring to the surface)
a portion of City Creek that runs parallel to the Folsom Trail from approximately 700
West to 1000 West. The designs include a public restroom, pond, pedestrian bridges,
bike racks, amphitheater, and public art among other amenities. The project is being
coordinated with another project to complete the Folsom Trail which is funded by $5
million from the voter-approved Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond.
6.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director TENTATIVE
5 min.
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of information items,
announcements, and scheduling items. The Board of Directors may give feedback or
policy input.
7.Report and Announcements from RDA Staff TENTATIVE
5 min.
The Board may review Board information and announcements. The Board may give
feedback on any item related to City business, including but not limited to:
•Project Updates;
•Community Updates; and
•Scheduling Items.
8.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair TENTATIVE
5 min.
Report of the Chair and Vice Chair.
D.Written Briefings – the following briefings are informational in nature and
require no action of the Board. Additional information can be provided to the
Board upon request:
NONE.
1.Informational: Pre-Disposition Property Report at 310 South 500 West in -
Adjournment
Station Center
-
The Board will receive a written briefing about plans for disposition of the property
located at approximately 310 South 500 West. This item is related to a proposed ground
lease and potential funding requests for a USA Climbing national training facility.
E.Consent – the following items are listed for consideration by the Board and can be
discussed individually upon request. A motion to approve the consent agenda is
approving all of the following items:
NONE.
F.Tentative Closed Session
The Board will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
1.discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of
an individual;
2.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
3.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property:
(i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or
(ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms;
4.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i)public discussion of the transaction would:
(A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms;
(ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered
for sale; and<
(iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale
5.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
6.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of
the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
G.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m. on _____________________, the undersigned, duly appointed City
Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
OPEN AND PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT
RDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS/SLC COUNCIL
2024
OPEN AND PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT
UTAH CODE CHAPTER 52-4
OPEN AND
PUBLIC
MEETINGS ACT
•Generally,
MEETINGS of a
PUBLIC BODY are
open to the public,
unless an
EXCEPTION allows
the meeting to be
CLOSED.
PUBLIC BODY
MEETINGS of a PUBLIC
BODY are open to the
public, unless an
EXCEPTION allows the
meeting to be CLOSED.
Salt Lake City Council/RDA
Board are PUBLIC BODIES.
MEETINGS
MEETINGS of a PUBLIC BODY
must be open to the public,
unless an EXCEPTION allows
the meeting to be CLOSED.
MEETINGS
•Convening of
•at least a quorum
•to discuss,receive comments,
or act on a matter over which
the body has jurisdiction or
advisory power.
WHICH GATHERINGS ARE SUBJECT TO THE OPEN AND PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT?
YES
•Electronic meetings
•Retreats
•Workshops
•Field trips
NO
•Chance meetings
•Social gatherings
•No quorum
TRANSPARENCY TO THE PUBLIC
REQUIREMENTS OF OPMA
PUBLIC
NOTICE
WHAT?
•Every Meeting
•Annual Meeting Schedule
•Emergency Meetings
HOW?
•Class A Notice
PUBLIC NOTICE EVERY MEETING
•24-hour notice
•Must include:
–Agenda
–Date
–Time
–Place
PUBLIC
NOTICEPUBLIC NOTICE ANNUAL MEETINGS
Annually scheduled meetings
–Date
–Time
–Place
•Revisions?
–Only if adding a NEW regularly scheduled
meeting
WHAT?
•Every Meeting
•Annual Meeting Schedule
•Emergency Meetings
HOW?
•Class A Notice
PUBLIC
NOTICE
WHAT?
•Every Meeting
•Annual Meeting Schedule
•Emergency Meetings
HOW?
•Class A Notice
EMERGENCY MEETINGS
•Cannot hold unless:
–Attempt to notify all members
–A majority of members approve holding
the emergency meeting
•Best notice practicable of time, place, and
topics
•Final action may be taken at an emergency
meeting if topic is listed on the agenda
PUBLIC
NOTICE
WHAT?
•Every Meeting
•Annual Meeting Schedule
•Emergency Meetings
HOW?
•Class A Notice
PROVIDING PUBLIC NOTICE
•Class A Notice
–Post on the Utah Public Notice website
–Post on the RDA Board/City Council’s
websites
–Post at a public location within the city
that is reasonably likely to be seen by
residents of the city
ELECTRONIC MEETINGS
TYPES OF ELECTRONIC MEETINGS
•Electronic meetings with anchor location
–Provide anchor location for the public to join
electronic meeting
•Electronic meetings WITHOUT anchor location
–Chair makes written determination, read at the
beginning of meeting
–Notice of meeting details the Chair’s determination,
facts supporting Chair’s determination, information on
how the public can connect
–Chair’s determination only lasts 30 days
MEETING RECORDS
OPEN MEETINGS
•Recording
•Written minutes
–Date, time, place
–Members present and absent
–Substance of all matters proposed, discussed,
or decided
–Record of each vote
–Name of member of the public who provided
comments and a summary of the comments
–Other information requested
•OFFICIAL RECORD = APPROVED WRITTEN
MINUTES
CLOSED MEETINGS
•Recording
–Date, time, place
–Names of all present and absent (unless
disclosure would impair confidentiality
necessary for original purpose of closing the
meeting
•Written minutes optional
•Exception if discussing
–Character, professional competence, or physical or
mental health of an individual
–Deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems
•Protected Records under GRAMA
OPEN AND
PUBLIC
MEETINGS ACT
•Generally,
MEETINGS of a
PUBLIC BODY are
open to the public,
unless an
EXCEPTION allows
the meeting to be
CLOSED.
CLOSED MEETINGS
A MEETING MAY BE CLOSED ONLY TO
DISCUSS SPECIFIED TOPICS
CLOSED MEETINGS
A MEETING MAY BE CLOSED ONLY TO DISCUSS SPECIFIED TOPICS
•An individual’s character, professional competence or physical or mental health
•Collective bargaining strategy
•Pending or reasonably imminent litigation
•Real property purchase, exchange, lease
–Disclose appraisal or value or prevent transaction on best possible terms
•Real property sale
–Disclose appraisal or value or prevent transaction on best possible terms;
–City previously gave notice that the property would be offered for sale; AND
–Terms of sale are publicly disclosed before the City approves the sale
•Deployment of security devices
•Criminal misconduct investigations
•Consideration of a loan application under certain circumstances
•Advice of legal counsel
CLOSED MEETINGS PROCEDURES
•Starts as open meeting
•2/3 vote to approve closing the
open meeting
•Publicly announce and enter into
the minutes:
–Reason(s) for closing the meeting
–Location of the meeting
–Roll call vote by name
PUBLIC COMMENT AND PARTICIPATION
PUBLIC COMMENT AND PARTICIPATION
•State law or City Code
requirements
•Other public comments
–At discretion of the Chair
–Comments may be discussed
during meeting if not on agenda
–No FINAL ACTION if not on
agenda
DISRUPTION OF MEETING
•May REMOVE an individual
from the meeting if
–WILLFULLY DISRUPTS to the
extent that the orderly conduct
of the meeting is SERIOUSLY
COMPROMISED
CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATING OPMA
CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATING OPMA
•Member may be charged with a
Class B misdemeanor if they
knowingly violates the closed
meeting provisions of OPMA
•Private individuals can bring lawsuit
for alleged violation of OPMA
–Final action may be void
–Suit must be commenced within 90 days
of the final action or 30 days of the final
action concerning issuance of bonds
QUESTIONS?
Thank you!
ERIN MENDENHALL MARY BETH THOMPSON
Mayor Chief Financial Officer
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
349 SOUTH 200 EAST
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114
TEL 801-535-7272
RDA BOARD TRANMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: ___________________
Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director Date sent to Council: ______________
_____________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 20, 2023
Alejandro Puy, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Information Officer __________________________
Danny Walz, RDA Director __________________________
SUBJECT: RDA Financial Audit – Fiscal Year 2022 – 2023
SPONSOR: N/A
STAFF CONTACT:
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
Mike Burns (801) 565-6461
Danny Walz (801) 535-7209
Eide Bailly
DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing
RECOMMENDATION: RDA Financial Audit – Fiscal Year 2022 – 2023
BUDGET IMPACT: N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: N/A
PUBLIC PROCESS: N/A
EXHIBITS:
1. RDA 2023 BOARD Communication letter
2. RDA 2023 Final Financial Statement
Erin Mendenhall (Dec 21, 2023 12:15 MST)
What inspires you, inspires us. | eidebailly.com
5 Triad Center, Ste. 600 | Salt Lake City, UT 84180-1106 | T 801.532.2200 | F 801.532.7944 | EOE
1
December 15, 2023
To the Board of Directors
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, Utah
We have audited the financial statements of Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (the Agency) as of and
for the year ended June 30, 2023, and have issued our report thereon dated December 15, 2023. Professional
standards require that we advise you of the following matters relating to our audit.
Our Responsibility in Relation to the Financial Statement Audit under Generally Accepted Auditing
Standards
As communicated in our letter dated October 24, 2023, our responsibility, as described by professional
standards, is to form and express an opinion about whether the financial statements that have been prepared
by management with your oversight are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit of the financial
statements does not relieve you or management of your respective responsibilities.
Our responsibility, as prescribed by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain
reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, as part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the Agency solely for the purpose of
determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control.
We are also responsible for communicating significant matters related to the audit that are, in our
professional judgment, relevant to your responsibilities in overseeing the financial reporting process.
However, we are not required to design procedures for the purpose of identifying other matters to
communicate to you.
Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit
We conducted our audit consistent with the planned scope and timing we previously communicated to you.
Compliance with All Ethics Requirements Regarding Independence
The engagement team, others in our firm, as appropriate, our firm, and other firms utilized in the
engagement, if applicable, have complied with all relevant ethical requirements regarding independence.
2
Qualitative Aspects of the Entity’s Significant Accounting Practices
Significant Accounting Policies
Management is responsibile for selecting and use appropriate accounting policies. A summary of the
significant accounting policies adopted by the Agency is included in Note 1 to the financial statements. No
matters have come to our attention that would require us, under professional standards, to inform you about
(1) the methods used to account for significant unusual transactions and (2) the effect of significant
accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or
consensus.
Significant Accounting Estimates
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based
on management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience
about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are
particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility
that future events affecting them may differ markedly from management’s current judgments. The most
sensitive accounting estimates affecting the financial statements are as follows:
• Net Pension Liability – The net pension liability is actuarily determined by the Utah Retirement
Systems (URS) in accordance with the requirements of government accounting standards. The
estimate is prepared by the URS for Salt Lake City Corporation, and the City allocates the liability and
other related balances to the various funds. We evaluated the report provided by the URS and the
key factors and assumptions used by the City in the allocation of the net pension liability to the
Agency and determined that the estimated net pension liability is reasonable in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole.
• Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts on
notes receivable is based on loan risk and management’s estimate of the collectability of the loans.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance for doubtful accounts
and determined that it is reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
Financial Statement Disclosures
Certain financial statement disclosures involve significant judgment and are particularly sensitive because of
their significance to financial statement users. The most sensitive disclosure affecting the Agency’s financial
statements relates to the Agency’s commitments disclosed in Note 10.
Significant Difficulties Encountered during the Audit
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management relating to the performance of the
audit.
Uncorrected and Corrected Misstatements
For purposes of this communication, professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely
misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that we believe are trivial, and communicate
them to the appropriate level of management.
3
Further, professional standards require us to also communicate the effect of uncorrected misstatements
related to prior periods on the relevant classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, and the
financial statements as a whole. Uncorrected misstatements or matters underlying those uncorrected
misstatements could potentially cause future-period financial statements to be materially misstated, even
though the uncorrected misstatements are immaterial to the financial statements currently under audit.
There were no uncorrected or corrected misstatements identified as a result of our audit procedures.
Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter,
whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter,
which could be significant to the Agency’s financial statements or the auditor’s report. No such
disagreements arose during the course of the audit.
Circumstances that Affect the Form and Content of the Auditor’s Report
For purposes of this letter, professional standards require that we communicate any circumstances that affect
the form and content of our auditor’s report. We did not identify and circumstances that affect the form and
content of the auditor’s report.
Representations Requested from Management
We have requested certain written representations from management which are included in the management
representation letter dated December 15, 2023.
Management’s Consultations with Other Accountants
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting
matters. Management informed us that, and to our knowledge, there were no consultations with other
accountants regarding auditing and accounting matters.
Other Significant Matters, Findings, or Issues
In the normal course of our professional association with the Agency, we generally discuss a variety of matters,
including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, significant events or transactions that
occurred during the year, operating conditions affecting the entity, and operating plans and strategies that may
affect the risks of material misstatement. None of the matters discussed resulted in a condition to our retention
as the Agency’s auditors.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of the
Agency and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties.
Salt Lake City, Utah
Financial Statements
June 30, 2023 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
(A Component Unit of Salt Lake City Corporation)
i
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Table of Contents
June 30, 2023
INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................................... i FINANCIAL SECTION:
Independent Auditor’s Report ......................................................................................................................................... 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 5
Basic Financial Statements
Financial Statements
Statements of Net Position ............................................................................................................................. 10
Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position ..................................................................... 12
Statements of Cash Flows .............................................................................................................................. 14 Notes to the Financial Statements ........................................................................................................................ 15
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ................................................................................. 16
Note 2. Cash and Cash Equivalents ............................................................................................................ 19
Note 3. Restricted Net Position .................................................................................................................. 20
Note 4. Loans and Other Long-Term Receivables ...................................................................................... 21
Note 5. Lease Receivables ......................................................................................................................... 21
Note 6. Capital Assets................................................................................................................................ 22
Note 7. Bonds Payable .............................................................................................................................. 22
Note 8. Pension Plans ................................................................................................................................ 24
Note 9. Equity Interest in Joint Venture ...................................................................................................... 30
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies................................................................................................... 32
Note 11. Concentrations .............................................................................................................................. 35 Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability ................................................................................ 37
Schedule of Contributions .......................................................................................................................................... 38
Notes to Required Supplementary Information ........................................................................................................... 38 Supplementary Information Combining Statement of Net Position Information by Project Area ............................................................................. 40
Combining Statement of Revenues and Expenses and Changes in Net Position by Project Area ................................... 42
Selected Financial Information by Project Area .......................................................................................................... 43
1
Financial Section
What inspires you, inspires us. | eidebailly.com
5 Triad Center, Ste. 600 | Salt Lake City, UT 84180-1106 | T 801.532.2200 | F 801.532.7944 | EOE
Independent Auditor’s Report
The Board of Directors
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, Utah
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying statements of net position of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City (the Agency), a component unit of Salt Lake City Corporation, Utah, as of June 30, 2023, and
the related statements of revenue, expenses and changes in net position and cash flows for the year
then ended and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Agency’s
basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Agency as of June 30, 2023, and the changes in its financial
position, and, where applicable, cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America (GAAS). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s
Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be
independent of the Agency, and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the
relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and for the
design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions
or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Agency’s ability to
continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any
currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
2
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that
includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and
therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher
than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a
substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a
reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
•Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
•Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such
procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements.
•Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Agency’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is
expressed.
•Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
•Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate,
that raise substantial doubt about the Agency’s ability to continue as a going concern for a
reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters
that we identified during the audit.
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s
discussion and analysis Verify on pages 5 through 8 and Required Supplementary Information on pages 37
and 38 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of
management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the
basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied
certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management
about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with
management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained
during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance
on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an
opinion or provide any assurance.
3
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively
comprise the Agency’s basic financial statements. The supplementary information on pages 40 through 42
are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial
statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly
to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly
to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the
basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the supplementary
information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
Salt Lake City, Utah
December 15, 2023
4
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
5
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
(Unaudited)
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (Agency) management presents to the readers of its financial statements
this narrative information. It contains an overview and analysis of the financial position and results of operations
as of, and for the year ended, June 30, 2023. As management of the Agency, we encourage readers to consider
information contained in this discussion.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
As of June 30, 2023, assets and deferred outflows of the Agency exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows by
$263,579,243 (net position). Of the total amount, $176,458,287 is available to meet ongoing obligations to
creditors. The remaining net position amount of $87,120,957 is either restricted or invested in capital assets, net of
related debt, and therefore not available to meet the Agency's ongoing obligations. Net position increased by
$28,041,649.
A significant portion of total assets is the unrestricted cash amounting to $68,456,820. Statutorily, the Agency is
required to spend the tax increment funds received within the boundaries of the project area for which it was
collected, except for affordable housing projects that benefit any area within the City. No one project or project
area has access to all of the unrestricted cash balance shown above. Restricted cash of $45,357,777 reflects
remaining bond proceeds for the Eccles Theater and the Regent Street projects, and other funds already
committed to specific projects.
Another significant portion of assets is the loans receivable balance. Loans are awarded to individuals and
businesses for acquisition, rehabilitation, new construction or façade renovation, and continue to be an important
aspect of the Agency’s blight elimination mission. For fiscal year 2023, the Agency originated $30,315,133 in
new loans. The amount of principal received on outstanding loans was $663,707. The Agency’s loans receivable
balance, including accrued interest is $67,920,453 an increase of $13,030,255.
OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This discussion and analysis serves as an introduction to the Agency's basic financial statements and the notes to
the financial statements. This report also contains information in addition to the basic financial statements that
will help the reader to gain a more in-depth understanding of the Agency.
The Statements of Net Position show the Agency’s total assets, deferred outflows, liabilities and deferred
inflows with the difference shown as net position for the most recent fiscal year. Increases or decreases over time
in net position give an indicator as to whether the financial condition of the Agency is improving or declining.
The Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position show the changes to net position that
occurred during the most recent fiscal year. These changes are recorded when the underlying event that causes the
change occurs regardless of when the cash transaction takes place. Therefore revenues and expenses are recorded
in this statement for some items that the resulting cash flows occur in a future period. Examples are future debt
interest payments when the fiscal year ends between interest payments, and earned, but not yet received, interest
on loans.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
6
The Statements of Cash Flows show the inflows and outflows of cash for the most recent fiscal year as a result
of transactions in four categories. The categories are operating activities, capital and related financing activities,
non-capital and related financing activities and investing activities.
Notes to the Financial Statements contain additional information important to a complete understanding of the
information contained in the basic financial statements. Notes to the financial statements begin on page 15 of this
report.
OTHER INFORMATION
Required supplemental schedules containing pension information and other supplementary information containing
selected data by project area are included in this report immediately following the notes to the financial statements
and can be found on pages 36-42.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
As mentioned earlier, changes in net position may over time indicate the Agency’s financial position. A significant
portion of the Agency’s net position, 82.8%, is comprised of its unrestricted amounts and amounts invested in
capital assets - net of related debt, and results from the Agency’s ongoing purpose of eliminating urban blight. The
Agency has issued debt to support several large scale economic development and public infrastructure projects.
As an incentive to a developer, the Agency may sell land for less than its cost or market value. Newly developed
properties generate increased property taxes, a portion of which the Agency receives to pay debt and finance
ongoing activities. The remaining portion of net position, 17.2%, represents resources that have restrictions on
how they can be used.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Net Position
Fiscal 2023 Fiscal 2022
Current and other assets $ 295,641,061 $ 274,450,675
Capital assets 41,763,180 41,633,453
Total assets $ 337,404,241 $ 316,084,128
Deferred outflow of resources $ 4,613,873 $ 5,110,747
Bonds payable $ 50,537,363 $ 56,380,000
Other liabilities 3,570,374 3,397,092
Total liabilities $ 54,107,737 $ 59,777,092
Deferred inflow of resources $ 24,331,134 $ 25,880,190
Net position
Invested in capital assets - net of related debt $ 41,763,180 $ 41,633,454
Restricted for capital construction 45,357,776 63,592,306
Unrestricted 176,458,287 130,311,834
Total net position $ 263,579,243 $ 235,537,594
Agency Activities
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
7
The Agency’s receipt of incremental property taxes, the increase in property taxes in excess of the tax base when
the project area was created, is generated from higher property values due to redevelopment activities.
Incremental property taxes received increased by $146,513 or 0.46%, during the fiscal year.
Total operating expenses of the Agency decreased by $1,312,782 or 3.9%. This change was due to an decrease in
overall redevelopment activities of the Agency of $1,299,326 and a decrease in Depreciation Expense of $13,456.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Changes in Net Position
Fiscal 2023 Fiscal 2022
Revenues
Program revenues
Rental and other income $ 2,789,666 $ 2,012,684
General revenues
Transfers in from Salt Lake City Corporation 22,627,900 39,855,868
Interest and investment valuation income 4,995,349 (442,423)
Gain/(Loss) on sale of capital assets — (6,054,782)
Grants and other contributions 32,252,004 32,105,491
Miscellaneous income (expense) 332 (1,222)
Total revenues 62,665,251 67,475,616
Expenses
Personnel services 2,262,907 1,588,385
Operating and maintenance 1,529,860 1,239,009
Charges and services 28,026,607 30,291,307
Depreciation and amortization 650,024 663,479
Interest and fiscal charges 2,043,494 3,973,156
Change in equity interest in joint venture 110,709 (640,830)
Total expenses 34,623,601 37,114,506
Increase/(Decrease) in net position 28,041,649 30,361,110
Net position, beginning 235,537,594 205,176,484
Net position, ending $ 263,579,243 $ 235,537,594
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital Asset investments by the Agency consist of land, land improvements, buildings, construction in process
and a small amount of equipment. The investment in capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, increased by
$129,726 in fiscal year 2023.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Capital Assets, Net of Depreciation
Fiscal 2023 Fiscal 2022
Land and easement rights $ 21,324,975 $ 20,455,049
Parking facilities and plaza 6,617,037 7,211,355
Other buildings 387,242 493,897
Equipment 85,290 124,518
Construction in progress 13,348,636 13,348,636
Total $ 41,763,180 $ 41,633,455
Additional information relating to the capital assets of the Agency can be found in Note 6, on page 22 of this
report.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
8
Long-term debt (net) of the Agency totaled $44,462,363 as of June 30, 2023. The tax increment bonds require
semi-annual interest payments and annual principal payments. Principal payments for the 2013 bonds began in
April 2016. Principal payments for the 2015 bonds began in April 2018. Principal payment on the 2019 refunding
bonds began in April 2020.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Long-Term Debt
Fiscal 2023 Fiscal 2022
2013 Tax increment bonds, net $ — $ 3,765,000
2015A and 2015B Tax increment bonds 8,845,000 10,075,000
2019 Tax Increment refunding bonds, net 41,720,000 42,540,000
Total $ 50,565,000 $ 56,380,000
Additional information on the Agency’s long-term debt can be found in Note 7, beginning on page 23 of this
report.
Requests for information
Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial
information should be addressed to the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, 451 South State Street, Room
118, P.O. Box 145518 Salt Lake City Utah, 84114-5518.
* * * * *
9
Basic Financial Statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
10
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2023
Assets
Current assets
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents $ 68,456,820
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 45,357,777
Loans and other long-term receivables, current portion 724,895
Other current receivables 1,309,908
Lease receivable, current portion 393,438
Prepaid expenses 88,665
Total current assets 116,331,503
Non-current assets
Capital assets, at cost
Land and rights 21,324,975
Parking facilities and plaza 55,022,531
Other buildings 576,742
Office furniture and equipment 391,601
Construction in progress 13,348,636
Accumulated depreciation (48,901,305)
Net capital assets 41,763,180
Loans and other long-term receivables, net of current portion 67,195,558
Lease receivable, net of current portion 24,889,855
Land and buildings held for resale 36,796,546
Investment in joint venture 50,427,599
Total non-current assets 221,072,739
Total assets 337,404,241
Deferred Outflows
Deferred outflows - Pension 346,956
Deferred outflows - refunding of debt 4,266,916
Total assets and deferred outflows $ 342,018,114
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
11
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2023
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 2,745,152
Accrued compensation, current portion 37,680
Accrued interest payable 333,401
Bonds payable, current portion 6,075,000
Total current liabilities 9,191,233
Non-current liabilities
Accrued compensation, net of current portion 285,056
Net pension liability 169,084
Bonds payable, net of discounts and current portion 44,462,363
Total non-current liabilities 44,916,503
Total liabilities 54,107,737
Deferred inflows
Deferred inflows - Leases 24,326,002
Deferred inflows - Pensions 5,132
Total deferred inflows 24,331,134
Net Position
Net investment in capital assets 41,763,180
Restricted for construction and loan commitments held in escrow 45,357,776
Unrestricted 176,458,287
Total net position 263,579,243
Total liabilities, deferred inflows and net position $ 342,018,114
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
12
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Operating revenues
Rental and other income $ 1,153,608
Interest income from loans receivable 738,088
Interest income from leases 897,970
Miscellaneous income (expense) 332
Total operating revenues 2,789,998
Operating expenses
Personnel services 2,262,907
Operating and maintenance 1,529,860
Charges and services 28,026,607
Depreciation 650,024
Total operating expenses 32,469,399
Operating Gain (Loss) (29,679,400)
Non-operating revenues (expenses)
Interest income (loss) 4,995,349
Grants and other contributions 32,252,004
Changes in equity interest in joint venture (110,709)
Interest and fiscal charges (2,043,494)
Total non-operating revenues (expenses) 35,093,150
Gain/(Loss) before operating transfers 5,413,750
Transfers in from Salt Lake City Corporation 22,627,900
Change in net position 28,041,649
Net position, beginning of year 235,537,594
Net position, end of year $ 263,579,243
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
13
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Cash flows from operating activites
Cash received from rentals $ 1,177,647
Cash from miscellaneous income 333
Cash paid to suppliers (29,841,379)
Cash paid to employees (2,320,521)
Loans disbursed (9,784,191)
Principal collected on loans receivable 663,707
Interests collected on loans receivable 668,787
Net cash used in operating activities (39,435,617)
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities
Payments for acquisition of land and buildings held for sale (5,513,295)
Proceeds from sale of capital assets 194,455
Principal received on lease receivable 379,715
Principal payments made on bonds payable (5,815,000)
Interest and fiscal charges paid on bonds payable (1,562,318)
Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (12,316,443)
Cash flows from non-capital and related financing activities
Transfers in from Salt Lake City Corporation 22,627,900
Contributions from other taxing entities 32,252,004
Net cash from non-capital and related financing activities 54,879,904
Cash flows from investing activities
Interest received from investments and cash and cash equivalents 4,995,349
Distributions received from Interest in Joint Venture 730,930
Net cash from investing activities 5,726,279
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 8,854,123
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 104,960,474
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 113,814,597
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
14
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Statement of net position presentation of cash and cash equivalents
Unrestricted $ 68,456,820
Restricted 45,357,777
Total cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 113,814,597
Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash used for operating activities
Operating loss $ (29,679,400)
Adjustment to reconcile operating loss to net cash used for operating activities
Depreciation 650,024
Principal forgiven on loans receivable 159,530
Increase/(decrease) from:
Change in interest receivable (69,300)
Change in other receivables (419,763)
Change in prepaid expenses (52,665)
Change in pension assets 484,040
Change in deferred outflows-pension (67,581)
Change in accounts payable 27,985
Change in accrued compensation 31,857
Change in net pension liability 169,084
Changes in deferred inflows-pension (675,012)
Changes in deferred inflows - leases (873,932)
Total (30,315,133)
Loans disbursed (9,784,191)
Principal collected on loans 663,707 66
Net cash used for operating activities $ (39,435,617)
Schedule of Non-Cash Activities
Recognition of equity interest in joint venture $ (841,639)
Transfer of loans to Salt Lake City Corporation (622,448)
15
Notes to the Financial Statements
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
16
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and History
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (the Agency) was established in 1969 by Salt Lake City
Corporation (the City) pursuant to the provisions of the Community Development and Renewal Agencies Act. The
Agency is charged with the responsibility for the elimination of blight through the process of redevelopment in
designated project areas. This objective is generally accomplished through: installation of public improvements,
grants and loans provided to residents and businesses for improvements, and acquisition and preparation of land
sites and sale of such land for development by the private or public sector. As an incentive to a developer, the
Agency may sell land for less than its cost or market value.
Basis of Presentation
The Agency, a separate legal entity that operates as an enterprise fund, is a blended component unit of the City
and is included in the City’s annual comprehensive financial report. The accompanying financial statements
include certain funds which were established in accordance with bond requirements. The records of the Agency
are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Agency considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Investments
Investments are shown at fair value, based upon quoted market prices. A portion of the Agency’s investments at
June 30, 2023, are deposited in the pooled cash account of the City. The City’s pooled cash account is invested
primarily in the Public Treasurer’s Investment Fund (the Treasurer’s Fund) which is not registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulatory oversight of the Treasurer’s Fund is provided by the Money
Management Council, which is subsequently monitored by the State of Utah. The fair market value of the
Agency’s position in the fund is the same as the value of the fund shares owned by the Agency.
Allowance for Doubtful Receivables
Historically, the Agency has not experienced any significant losses from bad debts in the past. However, the
Agency acquired two additional housing loan portfolios. Management believes there are potential impairments
with those loan portfolios at June 30, 2023, therefore, a reserve for bad debt expense was established at the time
of transfer. The current allowance totals $2,500,000. The allowance will be reviewed each year as portfolio
performance changes.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
17
Lease Receivables
Lease receivables are recorded by the Agency as the present value of future lease payments expected to be
received from the lessee during the lease term, reduced by any provision for estimated uncollectible amounts.
Lease receivables are subsequently reduced over the life of the lease as cash is received in the applicable reporting
period. The present value of future lease payments to be received are discounted based on the interest rate the
Agency charges the lessee.
Capital Assets
Property, equipment, and land are carried at cost. Depreciation of equipment and structures is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives that range from 5 to 35 years. No depreciation is recorded on
construction in process until the construction project is complete and the asset is placed into service. When assets
are retired or otherwise disposed of, costs and related accumulated depreciation, if any, are removed, and any
resulting gain or loss is included in revenues or expenses. The capitalization threshold for capital assets is
$20,000.
Land and Buildings Held for Resale
Land and buildings held for resale, purchased as part of the Agency’s redevelopment efforts, are carried at the
lower of cost or net realizable value. The cost of buildings and improvements that the Agency determines not to
be recoverable are expensed. Gains and losses (including impairment) on land and buildings held for resale are
included in revenues and expenses.
Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources
In addition to assets, financial statements will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of
resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of
net position that applies to a future period(s) and will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense) until
then. In addition to liabilities, the financial statement will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows
of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of
net position that applies to a future period(s) and will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until
that time.
Deferred inflows related to leases where Agency is the lessor is reported in the statement of net position. The
deferred inflows of resources related to leases are recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) on a straight-line
basis over the term of the lease.
Transfers In and Transfers Out
Transfers In are property taxes, sales taxes received and other fees collected by the City and transferred to the
Agency. Transfers In of property taxes are the portion of the incremental property tax in the designated program
areas attributable to increases over the base year in which the properties were designated as redevelopment areas.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
18
Transfers Out are expenditures of program funds through another City department or operating expenditures for
internal services of the City.
Revenue Recognition
Rental revenue, interest revenue from loans, and miscellaneous revenue are reported as operating revenues.
Transactions which are capital, financing or investing related, including transfers in, are reported as non-operating
revenues. Revenue for services is recognized at the time the service is performed. Revenue from private donations
is recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements have been satisfied.
Operating and Non-Operating Revenue and Expenses
Operating revenues and expenses result from providing goods and services relating to the primary operations of
the Agency. Other revenues and expenses are reported as non-operating. All expenses related to operating the
Agency are reported as operating expenses. Interest expense and financing costs are reported as non-operating
expenses.
Restricted and Unrestricted Resources
Some projects may receive more than one source of funding. The Agency is restricted by some sources to apply
funds only to specific approved projects. The Agency priority is to utilize restricted funds, before using
unrestricted funds.
Pensions
For purposes of measuring the net pension asset or liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows
of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Utah
Retirement Systems Pension Plan (URS) and additions to/deductions from the URS’s fiduciary net position have
been determined on the same basis as they are reported by URS. For this purpose, benefit payments (including
refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms.
Investments are reported at fair value.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires the Agency to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from
those estimates.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
19
2. Cash and Cash Equivalents
The following is a summary of cash and cash equivalents at June 30:
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market accounts $ (17,768,787)
Investments in the pooled investment account of Salt Lake City Corporation 131,583,284
Petty Cash 100
$ 113,814,597
Financial statement presentation
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents $ 68,456,820
Restricted cash and cash equivalents, current portion 45,357,777
$ 113,814,597
The Agency maintains funds in the City’s pooled cash and investment accounts. The Agency pays the City or
receives from the City an allocation of interest expense or income based upon each of the RDA's fund's relative
balance in the pooled accounts.
Deposits
It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in accordance with principles of sound treasury management and
in compliance with state and local laws, regulations, and other policies governing the investment of public funds,
specifically according to the terms and conditions of the Utah State Money Management Act of 1974 (the Act)
and Rules of the State Money Management Council as currently amended, and the City’s own written investment
policy.
City policy provides that not more than 25% of the total City funds or 25% of the Qualified Depository’s
allotment, whichever is less can be invested in any one Qualified Depository. Not more than 20% of total City
funds may be invested in any one certified out-of-state depository institution. However, there shall be no
limitation placed on the amount invested with the Treasurer’s Fund and other money market mutual funds,
provided that the overall standards of investments achieve the City’s policy objectives. All of the Agency’s
deposits during the years ended June 30, 2023, were made with Qualified Depositories.
Deposit Custodial Credit Risk
Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the government’s deposits may not be returned
to it. The State of Utah does not require collateral on deposits. As of June 30, 2023, none of the Agency’s cash
balance was covered by federal depository insurance. The Agency’s cash balance of $113,814,597 as of June 30,
2023, was uninsured and was not collateralized and therefore was exposed to some degree of custodial credit risk.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
20
Investments
The Agency’s investment balance as of June 30, 2023, included in cash and cash equivalents, was $129,433,923.
The City may place public money in investments authorized by the Act (U.C.A 51-7-11). The Utah State
Treasurer shall ensure that all purchases and sales of securities are settled within 15 days of the trade date. In
general, these investments can be any of the following subject to restrictions specified in the Act: Obligations of
the U.S. Treasury and most Government-Sponsored Agencies; Commercial paper; Bankers Acceptances; Publicly
traded fixed rate corporate obligations; Certain variable rate securities and deposits; Deposits with the State Public
Treasurer’s Investment Pool; Certain fixed rate negotiable deposits with a qualified depository or through a
certified dealer; Qualifying repurchase agreements; Open-end managed money market mutual funds; Utah State
Treasurer’s Investment Pool; and Investment with deferred compensation plan administrators.
The Agency did not enter into any reverse repurchase agreements during the year ended June 30, 2023. The
Agency does not have a formal investment policy that limits investment maturities as a means of managing its
exposure to fair value losses arising from increasing interest rates.
Fair Value of Investments
The Agency measures and records its investments using fair value measurement guidelines established by
generally accepted accounting principles. These guidelines recognize a three-tiered fair value hierarchy, as
follows:
• Level 1: Quoted prices for identical investments in active markets;
• Level 2: Observable inputs other than quoted market prices; and,
• Level 3: Unobservable inputs.
At June 30, 2023, the Agency had $131,583,284 in investments in the pooled investment account of the City,
which were invested in the State Public Treasurer’s Investment Pool. These investments were valued by applying
the fair value factor, as calculated by the Utah State Treasurer, to the Agency’s average daily balance in the
Treasurer’s Fund at June 30, 2023. Such valuation is considered a Level 2 valuation for GASB Statement No. 72
purposes.
3. Restricted Net Position
Certain components of net position are restricted by provisions of the applicable bond resolutions adopted and
entered into by the Agency (Note 7).
The following is a summary of restricted net position at June 30.
Restricted for construction improvements under the related bond resolutions $ 21,028,828
Restricted for construction by appropriation 24,328,949
Total restricted net position $ 45,357,777
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
21
4. Loans and Other Long-Term Receivables
The following is a summary of loans and other long-term receivables at June 30.
Tax increment rehabilitation loans bearing interest from 0% to 5%.
Principal and interest are payable in monthly installments;
includes accrued interest of $155,269 $ 28,677,267
Loans bearing interest at 2.5% to 3%, interest payable monthly;
collateralized by property, letters of credit, and restricted
cash accounts; includes accrued interest of $0 5,180,754
Housing loans bearing interest from 0% to 3%, with principal
and interest due monthly; collateralized by property; includes
accrued interest of $271,341 18,197,187
Housing Trust Fund loans bearing interest from 0% to 5%, principal and
interest payments due monthly or annually; includes $0 accrued
interest, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,500,000 17,905,103
Total 69,960,311
Less current portion (724,895)
Total loans and other long-term receivables $ 69,235,416
As of June 30, 2023, the Agency had committed to, and approved funding for, additional loans totaling
$34,306,462, which funds had not yet been disbursed.
5. Lease Receivables
The Agency has accrued a receivable for three parking structure leases. The remaining receivable for these leases
was $25,283,294 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Deferred inflows related to these leases were $24,326,002 as
of June 30, 2023. Interest revenue recognized on these leases was $897,970 for the year ended June 30, 2023.
Principal receipts of $393,438 were recognized during the fiscal year. The interest rate on the leases is 3.5%. Final
receipt is expected in fiscal year 2052.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
22
As of June 30, 2023, the Agency anticipates the following payments on lease receivables.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 392,417 $ 884,367 $ 1,276,784
2025 406,508 870,276 1,276,784
2026 458,233 855,085 1,313,318
2027 475,701 838,638 1,314,339
2028 492,737 821,602 1,314,339
2029-2033 3,026,961 3,810,403 6,837,365
2034-2038 3,829,401 3,701,373 7,530,774
2039-2043 4,725,443 3,586,401 8,311,844
2044-2048 6,062,344 3,464,495 9,526,839
2049-2052 5,413,547 3,337,023 8,750,570
Total $ 25,283,293 $ 22,169,663 $ 47,452,956
6. Capital Assets
The following is a summary of transactions affecting capital assets for the year ended June 30, 2023:
Description Balance July 1, 2022 Additions Transfers Retirements Balance June 30, 2023
Office furniture and equipment $ 500,836 $ — $ — $ (109,235) $ 391,601
Parking facilities and plaza 55,022,531 — — — 55,022,531
Other buildings 666,918 — (90,177) — 576,741
Construction in process 13,348,636 — — — 13,348,636
Land and rights 20,455,049 — 869,927 — 21,324,976
Total 89,993,970 — 779,750 (109,235) 90,664,485
Accumulated depreciation
Office furniture and equipment (376,318) (39,228) — 109,235 (306,311)
Parking facilities (47,811,176) (594,318) — — (48,405,494)
Other buildings (173,022) (16,478) — — (189,500)
Total accumulated depreciation (48,360,516) (650,024) — 109,235 (48,901,305)
Net capital assets $ 41,633,453 $ (650,024) $ 779,750 $ — $ 41,763,180
Land and rights includes approximately $10,598,000 for Block 79, site of the Delta Center Arena sports complex.
Block 79 was leased to Larry H. Miller Arena Corporation for 50 years at $1 per year. The lease will expire on
June 7, 2040.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
23
7. Bonds Payable
The following is a summary of bonds payable at June 30, 2023.
Series 2015A tax increment revenue bonds
2.57% due 2020 through 2029 $ 8,845,000
Series 2019 tax increment revenue refunding bonds
(Advanced Refund Series 2013); 1.95% to 2.976%, due 2020 through 2031 41,720,000
Less deferred outflows (4,266,916)
Less unamortized discounts (27,637)
Total bonds payable 46,270,447
Less amount due within one year 6,075,000
Total bonds payable less amount due within one year $ 40,195,447
The following is a summary of transactions affecting bonds payable for the year ended June 30, 2023:
Balance July 1, 2022 Additions
Principal Payments and Reductions Balance June 30, 2023 Due Within One Year
Federally taxable tax increment
revenue bonds Series 2013 $ 3,765,000 $ — $ (3,765,000) $ — $ —
Subordinate tax increment
revenue bonds Series 2015A 10,075,000 — (1,230,000) 8,845,000 1,300,000
Federally taxable subordinate tax
revenue refunding bonds Series 2019 42,540,000 — (820,000) 41,720,000 4,775,000
Less unamortized discounts
and deferred outflows (4,831,373) — 536,819 (4,294,554) —
Total bond obligations $ 51,548,627 $ — $ (5,278,181) $ 46,270,447 $ 6,075,000
In October 2013, the Agency issued $64,730,000 in federally taxable tax increment revenue bonds, with interest
rates ranging from 3.0% to 6.0%. The bond proceeds were used to fund the construction of the Eccles Theater.
The Agency received net proceeds of $63,929,046, including accrued interest of $1,377,835, and net of issuance
costs of $735,103 (which were expensed on the statement of revenues and expenses and changes in net position),
and a discount of $65,851, which is being amortized over the life of the bonds using the straight-line interest
method.
In May 2015, the Agency issued $12,215,000 in Series 2015A subordinate tax increment revenue bonds and
$1,060,000 in Series 2015B taxable subordinate tax increment revenue bonds (total of $13,275,000) for the
construction of the Regent Street Improvements. The interest rates on the Series 2015A and 2015B bonds are
2.57% and 2.66%, respectively. The Agency received net proceeds of $12,543,274, including accrued interest of
$631,975 and issuance costs of $99,752, which were both expensed as incurred.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
24
In November 2019, the RDA issued Tax Increment Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2019 at a par amount of
$44,640,000, for the purpose of refunding a portion of the Agency's outstanding Taxable Tax Increment Revenue
Bonds, Series 2013 (Performing Arts Center Project). The difference between the cash flows required to service
the old debt and the cash flows required to service the new debt was $6,133,692. The Agency also incurred a cost
of issuance of $347,995, which was expensed as incurred. The bonds carry coupon rates of 1.90% to 2.976% and
have a final maturity date of April 1, 2031. The True Interest Cost of the bonds is 2.745%. The refunding of the
Series 2013 bonds resulted in net present value savings of $2,305,750.
Bond principal and interest maturities are as follows.
Year ending June 30, Principal Interest Total Obligation
2024 $ 6,075,000 $ 1,333,604 $ 7,408,604
2025 6,265,000 1,191,945 7,456,945
2026 6,455,000 1,038,946 7,493,946
2027 6,670,000 876,253 7,546,253
2028 6,885,000 701,961 7,586,961
2029-2033 18,215,000 1,019,062 19,234,062
Less unamortized discounts and deferred outflows (4,294,554) — (4,294,554)
Total $ 46,270,446 $ 6,161,771 $ 52,432,217
8. Pension Plans
General Information about the Plan
Plan Description
Eligible plan participants are provided with pensions through the Utah Retirement Systems (URS). The URS are
comprised of the following pension trust funds:
• Public Employees Noncontributory Retirement System (Noncontributory System)
• Tier 2 Public Employees Contributory Retirement System (Tier 2 Public Employees System),which is a
multiple-employer, cost-sharing, public employee retirement system
The Tier 2 Public Employees System became effective July 1, 2011. All eligible employees beginning on or after
July 1, 2011, who have no previous service credit with any of the Utah Retirement Systems, are member of the
Tier 2 Retirement System.
The URS are established and governed by the respective sections of Title 49 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953, as
amended. The URS defined benefit plans are amended statutorily by the State Legislature. The Utah State
Retirement Office Act in Title 49 provides for the administration of the URS under the direction of the Utah State
Retirement Board (URS Board), whose members are appointed by the Governor. URS are fiduciary funds defined
as pension (and other employee benefit) trust funds. URS is a component unit of the State of Utah. Title 49 of the
Utah Code grants the authority to establish and amend the benefit terms.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
25
URS issues a publicly available financial report that may be obtained by writing to the Utah Retirement Systems,
560 East 200 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 or by visiting the website: www.urs.org.
Benefits Provided
URS provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Retirement benefits are as follows:
System Final Average Salary
Years of Service Required and/or Age Eligible for
Benefit Percentage per Year of Service COLA**
Noncontributory System Highest 3 years 30 years any age 2.0% per year all years Up to 4%
25 years any age*
20 years age 60*
10 years age 62*
4 years age 65
Tier 2 Public Employees System Highest 5 years 35 years any age 1.5% per year all years Up to 2.5%
20 years age 60*
10 years age 62*
4 years age 65
*with actuarial deductions
** All post-retirement cost-of-living adjustments are non-compounding and are based on original benefit except for Judges, which is a compounding benefit. The cost-of-living adjustments are also limited to the actual Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase for the year, although unused CPI increases not met may be carried forward to subsequent years.
Contributions
As a condition of participation in the URS, employers and/or employees are required to contribute certain
percentages of salary and wages as authorized by statute and specified by the URS Board. Employer contributions
are actuarially determined as an amount that, when combined with employee contributions (where applicable) is
expected to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to
finance any unfunded actuarial accrued liability.
Contributions rates as of June 30, 2023, are as follows:
Employee Paid Employer Paid Employer 401(k)
Noncontributory System
15 Local Government Div - Tier 1 N/A 17.97 % N/A
Tier 2 DC Only
211 Local Government N/A 6.19 % 10.00 %
For the year ended June 30, 2023, the employer and employee contributions to the URS were as follows:
Employer Contributions Employee Contributions
Noncontributory System $ 103,603 N/A
Tier 2 Public Employees System 154,707 N/A
Total Contributions $ 258,310 $ —
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
27
Year ended December 31, Net Deferred Outflows (Inflows) of Resources
2023 $ (38,169)
2024 4,064
2025 48,337
2026 175,121
2027 1,424
Thereafter 6,092
Actuarial assumptions
The total pension asset in the December 31, 2022 actuarial valuations was determined using the following
actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement:
Inflation 2.50%
Salary increases 3.25 - 9.25%, average, including inflation
Investment rate of return 6.85%, net of pension plan investment expenses, including inflation
Mortality rates were adopted from an actuarial experience study dated January 1, 2020. The retired mortality tables are developed usng URS retiree experience and are based upon gender, occupation, and age as appropriate with projected improvement using 80% of the ultimate rates from the MP-2019 improvement assumption using a
base year of 2020. The mortality assumption for active members is the PUB-2010 Employees Mortality Table for public employees, teachers, and public safety members, respectively.
The actuarial assumptions used in the January 1, 2022, valuation were based on an experience study of the
demographic assumptions as of January 1, 2020, and a review of economic assumptions as of January 1, 2021.
The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block
method, in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan
investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class and is applied consistently to each
defined benefit pension plan. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by
weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected
inflation. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are
summarized in the following table:
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
28
Expected Return Arithmetic Basis
Asset class
Target Asset Allocation
Real Return Arithmetic Basis
Long-Term Expected Portfolio Real Rate of Return
Equity securities 35.00 % 6.58 % 2.30 %
Debt securities 20.00 % 1.08 % 0.22 %
Real assets 18.00 % 5.72 % 1.03 %
Private equity 12.00 % 9.80 % 1.18 %
Absolute return 15.00 % 2.91 % 0.44 %
Cash and cash equivalents — % (0.11) % — %
Totals 100.00 % 5.17 %
Inflation 2.50 %
Expected arithmetic nominal return 7.67 %
The 6.85% assumed investment rate of return is comprised of an inflation rate of 2.50% and a real return of 4.35%
that is net of investment expense.
Discount Rate
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.85 percent. The projection of cash flows used
to determine the discount rate assumed that employee contributions will be made at the current contribution rate,
and that contributions from all participating employers will be made at contractually required rates that are
actuarially determined and certified by the URS Board. Based on those assumptions, the pension plan's fiduciary
net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current, active, and
inactive employees. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to
all periods of projected benefit payments, to determine the total pension liability. The discount rate does not use
the Municipal Bond Index Rate.
Sensitivity of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Asset and Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate
The following presents the proportionate share of the net pension liability calculated using the discount rate of
6.85 percent, as well as what the proportionate share of the net pension liability (asset) would be if it were
calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percentage point lower (5.85 percent) or 1 percentage point higher (7.85
percent) than the current rate:
1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase 5.95% 6.95% 7.95%
Noncontributory System $ 793,981 $ 125,982 $ (432,166)
Tier 2 Public Employees System 188,334 43,102 (68,780)
Total $ 982,315 $ 169,084 $ (500,946)
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
29
Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Detailed information about the pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued URS
financial report.
Defined Contribution Savings Plans
The Defined Contribution Savings Plans are administered by the URS Board and are generally supplemental plans
to the basic retirement benefits of the URS, but may also be used as a primary retirement plan. These plans are
voluntary, tax-advantaged retirement savings programs authorized under sections 401(k), 457(b), and 408 of the
Internal Revenue code. Detailed information regarding plan provisions is available in the separately issued URS
financial report.
The Agency participates in the following Defined Contribution Savings Plans with URS:
• 401(k) plan
• 457(b) plan
• Roth IRA plan
• Traditional IRA plan
Employer and employee contributions to the URS Defined Contribution Savings Plans for the years ended June
30, were as follows.
2023 2022 2021
401(k) Plan
Employer contributions $ 62,175 $ 33,006 $ 37,442
Employee contributions 79,079 55,449 43,410 457(b) Plan
Employer contributions — — —
Employee contributions 43,280 34,450 9,830 Roth IRA Plan
Employer contributions — N/A N/A
Employee contributions 15,120 11,511 13,364 Traditional IRA Plan
Employer contributions — N/A N/A
Employee contributions 1,981 — —
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
30
9. Equity Interest in Joint Venture
Formation
In March 2013, the Agency, along with Salt Lake City (City) and Salt Lake County (County), executed an
Interlocal Cooperation Agreement to form and create a separate legal entity, the Utah Performing Arts Center
Agency (UPACA), an interlocal entity that will own, operate, maintain and improve the George S. and Dolores
Doré Eccles Theater (Theater).
Structure
The Agency owns 41.85%, with the City owning 33.15%, and the County owning 25% in UPACA. UPACA is
governed by a board of trustees consisting of nine members. Board membership is comprised of three
representatives appointed by the County and six representatives appointed by the City/Agency. Each
representative has one vote and each representative's term continues until a successor is appointed.
Operation
In March 2013, an Operating Agreement was entered into by UPACA, the Agency, the City and the County
assigning responsibility for the operation and management to the County Center for the Arts (CFA) through
December 31, 2041. CFA accounts for UPACA on a calendar year. Net operating income is distributed annually to
the partners in amounts outlined in organizational agreements after required contributions to operating and capital
reserve accounts. The County is responsible for any operating deficits of the Eccles Theater. The Agency is
responsible for any operating loss of the Eccles Site.
Equity
The Agency began construction on the Theater in 2014. The Theater, which hosts national touring Broadway
shows, concerts, comedy and other entertainment events, opened its doors on October 20, 2016. The first full year
of operations for UPACA ended December 31, 2017. The Agency formally transferred all assets to UPACA as of
July 2017, for accounting purposes. The Agency's equity interest in the net position of UPACA at December 31,
2022 was $50,427,599.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
31
Summary financial information for UPACA for 2022 is as follows:
Utah Performing Arts Center Agency
Summary Financial Information
As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2022
Pooled Cash and Investments $ 13,142,789
Accounts Receivable and prepaid expenses 942,857
Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation 115,398,120
Total assets 129,483,766
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 4,122,957
Show proceeds held for others 4,474,030
Due to Salt Lake County 390,724
Total liabilities 8,987,711
Total net position $ 120,496,055
Charges for services $ 8,597,041
Contributions and other revenues 50,000
Operating expenses (5,358,196)
Interest expense (45,163)
Depreciation (2,691,556)
Income (loss) before distributions 552,126
Distributions to owners (2,563,210)
Change in Net Postion $ (2,011,084)
Audited financial statements for UPACA may be obtained from Salt Lake County Arts and Culture, 50 West 200
South, Salt Lake City, UT 84101, or by calling 385-468-1020.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
32
10. Commitments and Contingencies
During the year ended June 30, 2013, the City issued $15,000,000 of Bond Anticipation Notes (BANS) to begin
construction on the Eccles Theater. These bonds were issued in expectation of the issuance of the Tax Increment
Bonds (as discussed in Note 7) and the Sales Tax Revenue Bonds issued by the City (as discussed below). The
City received the proceeds of the BANS and paid design and pre-construction costs. During the year ended June
30, 2014, the City issued Series 2013A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds in the amount of $51,270,000 to aid in
financing the construction of the Eccles Theater. With the proceeds of these bonds, the City paid off the BANS
and the remaining net proceeds of $34,349,587 were transferred to the Agency as a contribution from the City.
Bond issuance costs and accrued interest of $1,920,413 were recognized by the Agency as expense. In addition,
upon issuance of the bonds, the Agency used private donations of $2,596,649 and contributed $1,104,957 of its
own funds into an escrow account for capitalized interest on the bonds. In December 2019, the City completely
refunded the Series 2013A bonds by issuing Series 2019B taxable sales and excise tax revenue refunding bonds in
the amount of $58,540,000, saving the Agency over $11,000,000 in principal and interest payments. As of
June 30, 2023, anticipated cumulative payments remaining under the agreement were $76,689,609. Anticipated
payments are included in the table below.
The Agency will remit principal and interest payments semi-annually to the City per the debt service schedules as
a contribution to the City (expense). Total anticipated payments are as follows.
Annual
Year ending June 30, Obligation
2024 2,188,086
2025 2,187,723
2026 2,186,443
2027 2,184,427
2028 2,186,796
2029-2033 23,472,420
2034-2038 42,283,714
Total $ 76,689,609
As discussed previously, proceeds from the Series 2013 Agency bonds and Series 2013A City bonds provided
financing for the construction of the Eccles Theater on Block 70 within the Central Business District (CBD). The
remaining non-refunded portion of the Agency's Series 2013 bonds were paid in fiscal year 2023. The Series 2019
taxable tax increment revenue refunding bonds issued by the Agency mature in 2031. The Series 2019 taxable
sales and excise tax revenue refunding bonds (advance refunding of Series 2013A) issued by the City are payable
through fiscal year 2038. The annual debt service will be funded by the incremental property taxes generated from
the CBD Project area, Block 70 Community Development Area (CDA) and private donations. Annual principal
and interest payments on the bonds associated with the Theater are expected to require approximately 30% of tax
increment revenues generated from CBD and Block 70, beginning in fiscal year 2016. As of June 30, 2023, the
total principal and interest remaining to be paid on all bonds for the Eccles Theater project was $123,749,493.
The Agency has pledged future tax increment revenues to repay the remaining Series 2019 Tax Increment and
Series 2019A Sales Tax Revenue Refunding bonds. Through inter-local agreements entered into with the City and
Salt Lake County (the County), CBD tax increment revenue that would have been remitted to these agencies has
been pledged to the Agency through tax year 2040. In December 2011, the Agency entered into an agreement with
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
33
the City in which the Agency will retain a portion of the City's Taxing Entity Committee (TEC) allocation, in
order to pay principal and interest on the Theater bond obligations. Each year, beginning in tax year 2015 through
2040, the City will continue to receive from the Agency a dollar amount equal to the 2014 TEC allocation. The
original inter-local agreement specified that the Agency will retain 80% of the remaining TEC allocation. This
inter-local agreement was subsequently amended in May 2013 to provide that the Agency will retain up to 100%
of the remaining TEC allocation, as is necessary to fund debt service payments. The Agency is required to
reimburse the City for any portion of this additional TEC allocation that is utilized for debt service on the Eccles
Theater, with the balance accruing interest at the City's general fund rate. The Agency is required to commit CBD
tax increment in an amount equal to the City allocation under these agreements. Similarly, in October 2012, the
Agency entered into an interlocal agreement with the County wherein the Agency is entitled to retain the County's
portion of the CBD tax increment up to a maximum of $43,000,000. The County will continue to receive from the
Agency a dollar amount equal to the 2014 TEC allocation each year beginning in tax year 2015 through 2040, and
the Agency will retain the remaining TEC allocation to fund debt service on the Eccles Theater project. During the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, the Agency transferred $6,520,478 in CBD incremental tax revenue to Block 70
for Eccles debt service per the agreements, and transferred an additional $2,469,853 in available CBD tax
increment revenue. In addition, the Agency entered into an inter-local agreement with the City and the Salt Lake
City School District (SLCSD) wherein the Agency is entitled to receive the City's and SLCSD's portions of the tax
increment from the Block 70 CDA for twenty-five years, beginning in the tax year 2016, for the purpose of
funding debt service on the Eccles Theater. The tax increment funds are not limited to funding debt service, but
will also be used to fund the creation of a cultural core and for debt service on the Regent Street improvement
bonds. In addition, in September 2012, the Agency entered into an agreement with the County wherein the
Agency is entitled to receive the County’s portion of the Tax Increment from the Block 70 CDA for 25 years,
beginning in tax year 2016, up to a maximum of $7,000,000 for the purposes of funding debt service on the
Eccles Theater. During the year ended June 30, 2023, the Agency received an additional $4,150,044 in
incremental property taxes under these agreements. The Agency expended $9,564,596 to cover the principal and
interest payments due during the year.
During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Agency entered into a reimbursement agreement with Rio Grande
Development LLC, a developer of a project within the Agency's Depot District Project Area. Tremonton
Hospitality LLC, dba Urban Suites assumed the agreement through an assignment and assumption agreement
signed in June 2016. NF IV-VA SSCI Salt Lake LLC assumed the agreement through an assignment and
assumption agreement signed in Fiscal Year 2021. Under this agreement, the Agency is obligated to repay to the
developers, from the tax increment revenue increases received from the prospective projects, at the lesser of
$2,020,000 or 37.5% of the tax increment increases over the reimbursement term, plus accrued interest, but not to
exceed the tax increment revenues received by the Agency from the individual projects. These obligations are also
subject to the developers paying property taxes in a timely manner and the receipts of certificates project
completion. For the year ended June 30, 2023, the Agency paid the developers $73,047.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Agency entered into a reimbursement agreement with 222 S. Main
Investments, LLC, a developer of a project within the Agency’s Central Business District Project Area. Under this
agreement, the Agency is obligated to repay to the developers 85% of the tax increment revenues received by the
Agency from the respective project up to the lesser of: 1) total developer costs less $127,300,000 or 2)
$6,000,000, plus accrued interest of 5.9%, over the reimbursement term, which expires in January 2031. These
obligations are also subject to the developers paying property taxes on a timely basis, the receipt of certificates of
project completion, and annual certificates of compliance with the other terms of the reimbursement agreement.
For the year ended June 30, 2023, the Agency recorded expenses of $559,841.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
34
During the year ended June 30, 2015, the Agency entered into a reimbursement agreement with Liberty Gateway
Properties, L.C. (Liberty) for a mixed-use housing project located on 500 West between South Temple and 100
South, in the Agency’s Depot District Project Area. The agreement provides a tax increment reimbursement to the
Developer for costs incurred in connection with the associated parking garage component of the project from the
tax increment created from the property. Under the agreement, the Agency will pay the Developer a
reimbursement amount equal to the sum of 1) $3,000 multiplied by the actual number of eligible at-grade
structured parking stalls (up to a maximum of 48 stalls), plus 2) $6,000 multiplied by the actual number of below-
grade structured parking stalls (up to a maximum of 112), together with simple interest accrued thereon. The
maximum that will be reimbursed is $816,000. The reimbursement term is for the tax years 2015 through 2022.
The Agency will make an annual payment to the Developer during the reimbursement term in an amount equal to
72% of the tax increment for such year actually received by the Agency until the earlier to occur of 1) Developer
has received an amount equal to the reimbursement amount or 2) the expiration of the reimbursement term. These
obligations are subject to the Developer paying property taxes on a timely basis, receipts of certificates of project
completion, and other annual reporting duties as defined in the reimbursement agreement. For the year ended
June 30, 2023, the Agency recorded expenses of $129,148.
During the year ended June 30, 2017, the Agency and Larry H. Miller Arena Corporation (the "Lessee"), entered
into a Participation and Reimbursement Agreement for the renovation of the Delta Center Arena at 301 West
South Temple, as part of the Central Business District Neighborhood Redevelopment Project Area Plan. This
agreement outlines the Agency's commitment to partially reimburse the Lessee for public area upgrades through
tax increment financing, with a cap of $15,946,396 for Tax Increment (TI) Reimbursement Payments and
$6,753,604 for Grant Reimbursement Payments, ensuring the total reimbursement does not exceed $22,700,000.
The Reimbursement Term will expire December 31, 2040, with annual payments contingent on the Lessee's
compliance with specific conditions, including project completion, property tax payments, and maintaining the
Arena as the home venue for Utah Jazz NBA games. The Agency retains the right to issue bonds secured by the
tax increment, with the understanding that this will not absolve it of its obligations under this agreement. The
Agency's financial commitment, encompassing both TI and Grant Reimbursement Payments, is firmly capped,
and any shortfall in tax increment generation will not extend the Agency's obligations beyond the agreed term. For
the year ended June 30, 2023, the Agency recorded expenses of $657,881, which consisted of $350,899 of TI
Reimbursement Payments and $306,982 of Grant Reimbursement Payments.
During the year ended June 30, 2019, the Agency entered into a reimbursement agreement with Stadler US, Inc, a
developer of a project located within the Agency’s Stadler Rail Project Area. Under the agreement, the Agency is
obligated to reimburse the developers, from the tax increment revenues received from the respective projects, up
to $9,610,721 over a twenty (20) year term, but not in excess of the tax increment revenues received from the
individual projects. These obligations are also subject to the developers paying property taxes on a timely basis
and the receipts of certificates of project completion. For the year ended June 30, 2023, the Agency made
reimbursements to Stadler for tax years 2019-2022 totaling $350,941.
During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Agency entered into a reimbursement agreement with NWQ, LLC, a
developer of a project located within the Agency’s Northwest Quadrant Project Area. Under the agreement, the
Agency is obligated to reimburse the developers, from the tax increment revenues received from the respective
projects, up to $28,000,000 over a nineteen (19) year term, but not in excess of the tax increment revenues
received from the individual projects. These obligations are also subject to the developers paying property taxes
on a timely basis and the receipts of certificates of project completion. The first reimbursement was made for tax
years 2019-2021. The total reimbursement paid for the year ended June 30, 2023 to NWQ LLC, was $154,107.
During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Agency entered into a reimbursement agreement with West Quarter
Residential I, LLC, a developer of a project located within the Agency’s Block 67 Project Area. Under the
agreement, the Agency is obligated to reimburse the developers, from the tax increment revenues received from
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2023
35
the respective projects, up to $15,000,000 over a twenty (20) year term as a pass-through from Salt Lake County
for transportation funds from the State of Utah, but not in excess of the tax increment revenues received from the
individual projects. These obligations are also subject to the developers paying property taxes on a timely basis
and the receipts of certificates of project completion. The first year of reimbursement was anticipated to be for the
2022 tax year. No payments were made during the ended June 30, 2023.
In March, 2008, the Agency and the State of Utah (State) entered into a lease agreement for the rental by the State
of 250 parking stalls in a parking structure owned by the Agency. The lease requires monthly payments of $20
per stall, for a total of $5,000 per month. The lease term is 20 years. In addition, the lease includes a provision for
the repayment of a portion of the construction costs to be paid by the State of $350,000 over the term of the
parking rental agreement. The repayment terms requires interest of 3% and monthly payments of $2,077, in
addition to the monthly rent payments. The balance of the unpaid amount as of June 30, 2023, was $69,533,
which has been recorded as a note receivable.
11. Concentrations
Operating revenues are not adequate to fund operations of the Agency. The Agency received $46,422,496 of
transfers of tax increment from various taxing entities during the year ended June 30, 2023, which were recorded
as non-operating revenues of $32,252,004 in Grants and other contributions, and $14,170,492 in Transfers In.
These funds are critical for the continuing operations of the Agency.
36
Required Supplementary Information
June 30, 2023 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
37
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Schedule of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability
December 31, 2022
Last 10 Years*
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Noncontributory System 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Proportion of the net pension liability 0.07% 0.08% 0.09% 0.04% 0.07% 0.06% 0.05% 0.07%
Proportionate share of the net pension liability $ 125,982 $(465,973) $ 351,656 $ 285,453 $ 301,169 $ 405,107 $ 297,064 $ 317,700
Covered payroll $ 573,163 $ 631,023 $ 743,599 $ 312,019 $ 558,845 $ 477,356 $ 432,740 $ 611,285
Proportionate share of the net pension liability
as a percentage of its covered payroll 21.98% (73.84)% 47.29% 91.49% 53.89% 84.86% 68.65% 51.97%
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the
total pension liability 97.50% 107.70% 93.70% 87.00% 91.90% 87.30% 87.80% 90.20%
Tier 2 Public Employees System 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Proportion of the net pension liability 0.04% 0.04% 0.05% 0.02% 0.02% 0.03% 0.04% 0.02%
Proportionate share of the net pension li bilit /( t) $ 43,102 $ (18,067) $ 12,332 $ 9,117 $ 2,007 $ 3,445 $ (83) $ (726)
Covered payroll $ 942,654 $ 792,345 $ 761,977 $ 248,511 $ 222,660 $ 269,084 $ 245,666 $ 117,554
Proportionate share of the net pension li bilit /( t)
as a percentage of its covered payroll 4.57% (2.28)% 1.62% 3.67% 0.09% 1.28% (0.03)% (0.62)%
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the
total pension liability 97.70% 103.80% 90.80% 90.80% 97.40% 95.10% 100.20% 103.50%
*In accordance with paragraph 81.a of GASB 68, employers will need to disclose a ten-year history of their proportionate share of the Net Pension Liability/(Asset) in their RSI. The ten-year schedule will need to be built prospectively. The schedule above is for the eight years currently available.
38
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Schedule of Contributions
June 30, 2023
Last 10 Fiscal Years*
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Noncontributory System 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Actuarial determined contributions $ 103,603 $ 114,810 $ 134,849 $ 56,778 $ 105,455 $ 91,614 $ 140,147 $ 175,299
Contributions in relation to the contractually required contribution (103,603) (114,810) (134,849) (56,778) (105,455) (91,614) (140,147) (175,299)
Contribution deficiency $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Covered employee payroll $ 573,163 $ 625,677 $ 734,726 $ 309,377 $ 575,011 $ 499,259 $ 432,740 $ 637,982
Contributions as a percentage of covered payroll ** 18.08% 18.35% 18.35% 18.35% 18.34% 18.35% 32.39% 27.48%
Tier 2 Public Employee System *** 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Actuarial determined contributions $ 17,566 $ 17,836 $ 16,191 $ 5,582 $ 5,169 $ 40,101 $ 33,041 $ 16,040
Contributions in relation to the contractually required contribution (17,566) (17,836) (16,191) (5,582) (5,169) (40,101) (33,041) (16,040)
Contribution deficiency $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Covered employee payroll $ 942,654 $ 228,743 $ 230,509 $ 276,833 $ 204,783 $ 268,954 $ 244,828 $ 122,688
Contributions as a percentage of covered payroll ** 1.86% 7.80% 7.02% 2.02% 2.52% 14.91% 13.50% 13.07%
*In accordance with paragraph 81.a of GASB 68, employers will need to disclose a ten-year history of their proportionate share of the Net Pension Liability/(Asset) in their RSI. The ten-year schedule will need to be built prospectively. The schedule above is for the eight years currently available.
**Contributions as a percentage of covered payroll may be different than the URS Board certified rate due to rounding or other administrative issues.
***Contributions in Tier 2 include an amortization rate to help fund the unfunded liabilities in the Tier 1 systems. Tier 2 systems were created effective July 1, 2011.
39
Supplementary Information
June 30, 2023 Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Combining Statements of Net Position Information by Project Area
June 30, 2023
9-Line Block 70 CDA CBD Citywide Housing Depot District Granary District
Housing Development Trust North Temple
North Temple Viaduct
Northwest Quadrant
Northwest Quadrant Housing
Program Income Fund Project Area Housing RDA Admin Revolving Loan Fund Stadler State Street
Sugarhouse Project
West Capital Hill West Temple Gateway Total
Assets
Cash and cash equivalent (unrestricted) $ 3,072,061 $(17,729,058)$ 14,215,990 $ 10,698,233 $ 4,035,812 $ 6,266,190 $ 6,514,036 $ 3,030,782 $ 58,395 $ 1,042,251 $ 873,866 $ 9,171,682 $ 2,321,522 $ 2,631,180 $ 15,080,779 $ 12,249 $ 6,101,351 $ 60,758 $ 912,693 $ 86,049 $ 68,456,820
Loans and other receivable — 1,309,908 3,727,703 17,128,528 — 136,962 22,547,385 4,475,342 — — — 26,261,003 — — 18,926,823 — — — — — 94,513,654
Cash and cash equivalent (restricted)25,246,305 1,990,429 91,584 8,311,474 2,345,770 645,664 2,060,459 3,774,933 43,721 12,295 194,908 636,507 3,727 45,357,777
Land and water rights — 4,790,823 15,664,227 — — — — — — — — 869,927 — — — — — — — — 21,324,976
Improvements - other than buildings — — 55,022,530 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 55,022,530
Buildings — — — — — — — — — — — — 576,742 — — — — — — — 576,742
Machinery and equipment — — 191,265 — — — — — — — — 34,975 — 165,361 — — — — — — 391,601
Construction in process — 12,683,590 665,047 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 13,348,636
Accumulated depreciation — — (48,510,558)— — — — — — — — (34,975)(189,500)(166,272)— — — — — — (48,901,305)
Land and buildings held for sale — — 4,615,001 1,000,000 18,633,492 — — — — — — 6,402,452 3,454,690 — 1,247,515 — — 1,414,806 28,590 — 36,796,546
Investment in Joint Venture — 50,427,599 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,427,599
Other assets 2,344 4,688 9,375 — 23,047 — — 2,148 — — — — — 33,000 — — — 7,031 4,688 2,344 88,665
Total Assets 3,074,405 76,733,854 47,591,008 28,918,346 31,003,825 6,403,152 31,407,190 8,153,936 58,395 3,102,710 873,866 46,479,998 6,207,174 2,675,563 35,450,025 12,249 6,101,351 1,482,595 1,582,478 92,120 337,404,241
Deferred outflows — 4,266,916 — — — — — — — — — — — 346,956 — — — — — — 4,613,873
Total assets and deferred outflows $ 3,074,405 $ 81,000,771 $ 47,591,008 $ 28,918,346 $ 31,003,825 $ 6,403,152 $ 31,407,190 $ 8,153,936 $ 58,395 $ 3,102,710 $ 873,866 $ 46,479,998 $ 6,207,174 $ 3,022,520 $ 35,450,025 $ 12,249 $ 6,101,351 $ 1,482,595 $ 1,582,478 $ 92,120 $ 342,018,114
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ — 1,838,407 (108,528)— 123,958 1,000 — — — — — 288,282 19,521 64,890 23,261 — — 63,000 428,361 3,000 $ 2,745,152
Accrued compensation - current — — — — — — — — — — — — — 37,680 — — — — — — 37,680
Accrued interest payable - current — 333,401 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 333,401
Bonds payable - current portion — 6,075,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,075,000
Pension liability — — — — — — — — — — — — — 169,084 — — — — — — 169,084
Long term compensation liability — — — — — — — — — — — — — 285,056 — — — — — — 285,056
Advances from (to) other funds — 1,150,000 (1,150,000)— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Bonds payable, net — 44,462,363 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44,462,363
Total liabilities — 53,859,171 (1,258,528)— 123,958 1,000 — — — — — 288,282 19,521 556,711 23,261 — — 63,000 428,361 3,000 54,107,737
Deferred inflows — — — — — — — — — — — 24,326,002 — 5,132 — — — — — — 24,331,134
Fund Balance
Net position, beginning 1,370,211 24,045,385 44,022,184 26,197,294 28,084,228 4,543,887 27,928,124 7,348,647 34,412 2,085,658 573,696 21,045,331 6,149,883 1,922,779 34,604,624 240,381 2,631,695 667,394 1,551,432 490,347 235,537,594
Revenues 4,342,047 11,057,955 30,114,898 5,119,245 7,592,514 1,942,255 8,079,495 1,807,482 2,745,502 1,587,495 1,674,276 12,625,595 78,669 4,666,017 1,253,972 144,088 7,806,726 768,782 634,645 16,980 104,058,639
Expenses 2,637,853 7,961,740 28,032,048 2,398,193 4,796,875 1,286,360 4,600,429 1,002,193 2,721,519 570,444 1,374,106 7,858,340 40,899 4,128,119 431,832 372,220 4,337,070 16,581 1,031,961 418,208 76,016,990
Net transfers in (out)(543,115)6,525,166 (8,169,250)2,322,243 (2,355,107)(378,582)3,081,321 (294,533)(40,800) (274,226) (1,374,106) 3,585,025 — 20,125,624 550,000 (21,751) (867,414) 750,744 6,323 337 22,627,900
Total net position, ending 3,074,405 27,141,600 46,105,034 28,918,346 30,879,867 5,199,782 31,407,190 8,153,936 58,395 3,102,710 873,866 25,812,585 6,187,654 2,460,677 35,426,764 12,249 6,101,351 1,419,595 1,154,117 89,120 263,579,243
Total liabilities, deferred inflows and net position $ 3,074,405 81,000,771 44,846,506 28,918,346 31,003,825 5,200,782 31,407,190 8,153,936 58,395 3,102,710 873,866 50,426,869 6,207,174 3,022,520 35,450,025 12,249 6,101,351 1,482,595 1,582,478 92,120 $ 342,018,114
40
41
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Combining Statement of Revenues and Expenses and Changes in Net Position by Fund
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
9-Line Block 70 CDA CBD Citywide Housing Depot District Granary District
Housing Develop- ment State Street North Temple
North Temple Viaduct CDA Northwest Quadrant
Northwest Quadrant Housing / UIPA
Program Income Fund
Project Area Housing
RDA Admini- stration
Revolving Loan Fund Stadler Sugarhouse Project
West Capital Hill
West Temple Gateway Total
Revenue
Net transfers In(Out)$ (543,115) $ 6,525,166 $ (8,169,250)$ 2,322,243 $ (2,355,107)$ (378,582) $ 3,081,321 $ (294,533) $ (40,800) $ (274,226)$ (1,374,106)$ 3,585,025 $ — $ 20,125,624 $ 550,000 $ (21,751) $ (867,414) $ 750,744 $ 6,323 $ 337 $ 22,627,900
Grants and Other Contributions 2,601,746 1,925,503 25,941,783 — 5,316,113 1,081,675 — 988,936 2,720,019 1,371,125 1,545,843 (171,737)— (15,544,598) — 138,526 4,337,070 — — — 32,252,004
Interest on Investments — 144,087 2,336,613 332,754 370,203 147,486 218,740 110,886 25,483 74,259 128,433 408,211 68,669 84,659 1,398 5,562 — 1,457 525,969 10,478 4,995,349
Rental & other income — — 45,138 66,056 — — 307,005 — — — — 2,013,893 — — 357,574 — — — — — 2,789,666
Miscellaneous revenue — — — — — — — — — — — — — 332 — — — — — — 332
Changes in Equity in JV — (110,709)— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — (110,709)
Gain/Loss on sale of capital assets — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total revenue $ 2,058,631 $ 8,484,047 $ 20,154,284 $ 2,721,052 $ 3,331,209 $ 850,580 $ 3,607,066 $ 805,289 $ 2,704,702 $ 1,171,158 $ 300,169 $ 5,835,393 $ 68,669 $ 4,666,017 $ 908,972 $ 122,337 $ 3,469,656 $ 752,201 $ 532,293 $ 10,815 $ 62,554,541
Expense
Personal Services $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 2,262,907 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 2,262,907
O & M — — — — — — — — — — — — — 14,572 — — — — — — 14,572
Charges & Services 354,437 3,344,338 17,470,961 — 535,570 194,685 128,000 — 2,680,719 154,107 — 1,068,139 14,421 1,817,568 86,832 350,470 — — 929,609 412,042 29,541,896
Depreciation — — 600,473 — — — — — — — — — 16,478 33,072 — — — — — — 650,024
Interest & Fiscal Charges — 2,043,494 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2,043,494
Contribs to SLC — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total expense 354,437 5,387,832 18,071,434 — 535,570 194,685 128,000 — 2,680,719 154,107 — 1,068,139 30,899 4,128,119 86,832 350,470 — — 929,609 412,042 34,512,892
Changes in net position $ 1,704,194 $ 3,096,215 $ 2,082,850 $ 2,721,052 $ 2,795,639 $ 655,895 $ 3,479,066 $ 805,289 $ 23,983 $ 1,017,051 $ 300,169 $ 4,767,254 $ 37,771 $ 537,897 $ 822,140 $ (228,132) $ 3,469,656 $ 752,201 $ (397,316) $ (401,227) $ 28,041,649
42
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Selected Financial Information by Project Area
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
9-Line Block 70 CDA CBD Citywide Housing Depot District Granary District
Housing Develop- ment State Street North Temple
North Temple Viaduct CDA Northwest Quadrant
Northwest Quadrant Housing / UIPA
Program Income Fund Project Area Housing
RDA Admini- stration Revolving Loan Fund Stadler Sugarhouse Project West Capital Hill
West Temple Gateway Total
Grants and Other Contributions $ 2,601,746 $ 1,925,503 $ 25,941,783 $ — $ 5,316,113 $ 1,081,675 $ — $ 988,936 $ 2,720,019 $ 1,371,125 $ 1,545,843 $ (171,737) $ — $ (15,544,598) $ — $ 138,526 $ 4,337,070 $ — $ — $ — $ 32,252,004
Loans receivable principal received — — — 39,930 — — 321,379 — — — — — 38,642 — — 263,757 — — — — 663,707
Interest on investments — 144,087 2,336,613 332,754 370,203 147,486 218,740 110,886 25,483 74,259 128,433 408,211 68,669 84,659 1,398 5,562 — 1,457 525,969 10,478 4,995,349
Bonds payable — 50,537,363 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 50,537,363
Interest and fiscal charges — 1,562,318 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,562,318
Debt principal paid — 5,815,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 5,815,000
Origination of loans — — 225,437 2,622,658 — 136,962 4,768,750 4,475,342 — — — — — — 1,872,994 — — — — — 14,102,143
Refunds of tax increment 284,437 505,445 12,704,953 — 202,195 — — — — 154,107 — — — — — 350,941 — — — — 14,202,078
Personal Services — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2,262,907 — — — — — — 2,262,907
Operating & Maintenance — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,529,860 — — — — — 1,529,860
Charges & Services 354,437 3,344,338 17,470,961 — 535,570 194,685 128,000 — 2,680,719 154,107 — 1,068,139 14,421 1,817,568 86,832 350,470 — — 929,609 412,042 29,541,896
Budgetary transfers in (out)(336,889) 6,623,842 (9,381,157) 1,993,593 (1,807,887)(316,685)— (657,924) (197,990)(36,542) (310,605)103,535 4,340,960 (16,250)— —
Depreciation 613,146 16,478 33,855 663,479
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL DANNY WALZ
Executive Director Director
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
STAFF MEMO
DATE:December 22, 2023
PREPARED BY:Ashley Ogden, Senior Project Manager
Marcus Lee, Project Coordinator
Cara Lindsley, Deputy Director
RE:USA Climbing at Station Center – Property Disposition at approximately 310
South 500 West
REQUESTED ACTION:Review the proposed term sheet and consider approving via attached
resolution
POLICY ITEM:Property Disposition, Budget
BUDGET IMPACTS:Proposed ground lease abatement and ~$8 million in direct financial
contribution and outside costs
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The RDA has been engaged in discussions with USA Climbing centered on the opportunity of locating
their permanent headquarters and national training facility on RDA-owned property at approximately 310
South 500 West, which is within the bounds of the Station Center redevelopment project. The RDA and
USA Climbing have negotiated the proposed term sheet (Attachment A), and key terms are summarized
in this memo. The RDA proposes to enter into a 99-year ground lease agreement with USA Climbing and
requests that the Board consider approving the requested lease abatement, which involves no lease
payments being charged while the facility is under construction and stabilization, and subsequent
escalation of the lease rate until 60% of fair market value (FMV) is reached. In addition, the proposed
terms call for multiple areas of direct RDA investment in the project that will require Board approval and
are being proposed separately in FY2024 Budget Amendment #2. If both the proposed term sheet and
budget amendment are approved, the RDA and USA Climbing will enter into an exclusive negotiation
agreement to memorialize these commitments until all conditions are met and final ground lease and
development agreements can be executed.
BACKGROUND:
USA Climbing is the national governing body of the sport of competition climbing in the United States
and as a 501(c)3 nonprofit, promotes the disciplines of bouldering, lead, and speed climbing, as well as
the collegiate and paraclimbing series. The organization is sanctioned by the International Federation for
Sport Climbing, the International Olympic Committee, and the United States Olympic & Paralympic
Committee. Sport Climbing became an official Olympic event at the 2020 Tokyo games and multiple
American athletes have already qualified for the 2024 Paris Summer Olympics.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518
WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCRDA.COM
TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
USA Climbing relocated to Salt Lake City from Boulder, Colorado, in 2018, and quickly announced their
intentions to establish a National Training Center where athletes could receive specialized training to
compete at the highest levels internationally. Since that time, the organization has been operating and
training athletes in Granary District buildings that are slated for eventual redevelopment, while also
searching for a site where they can develop a permanent headquarters and training facility. The Utah State
Legislature appropriated $15 million to USA Climbing during the 2023 session to support the effort.
In the Spring of 2023, the RDA was asked to explore potential opportunities to locate the new facility on
RDA-owned property, and USA Climbing expressed interest in the Station Center area. As the Station
Center Vision & Implementation Plan was actively in progress for most of this year, negotiations have
happened concurrently with the visioning and planning of the district. USA Climbing has been a great
partner, engaging in productive and transparent negotiations while being an active participant in Station
Center workshops and outreach events. RDA Staff welcomes the opportunity to continue to work with
USA Climbing to make the vision for the Station Center project a reality, with the headquarters and
national training facility serving as the first anchor tenant and catalytic flag in the ground. Please refer to
Attachment C, Station Center Site Plan.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project involves the construction of a national headquarters and training facility for USA Climbing
on the southwest corner of 500 West and 300 South and is anticipated to include three primary
components:
1. New construction of a primary structure that is 65-75 feet tall with a roughly 45,000 square
foot (sf) footprint (exact specifications subject to further community engagement). This structure
will include bouldering, lead, and speed climbing walls, as well as other support uses that are
typical of a climbing facility. Most areas will be accessible by the community; some spaces will
be reserved for the U.S. National Team’s exclusive use.
2. Rehabilitation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company building, anticipated to include
publicly facing and accessible food, beverage, and retail uses, as well as private spaces for USA
Climbing offices.
3. New construction of an outdoor plaza that will be utilized for USA Climbing-hosted
competitions as well as other non-USA Climbing events (will be designed to accommodate 3,500
– 5,000 spectators). Adjacent building facades will include climbing walls to be used for regular
training and competition events, with secure access controls that allow the public to view the
climbing but prevent general access from the plaza.
Design work is preliminary and if the project moves forward, USA Climbing will work with the Planning
and Building Services Divisions to achieve a design that meets applicable zoning and building code
requirements, in addition to receiving administrative design approval from the RDA. USA Climbing’s
goal is to break ground on the facility in Fall 2024 and be operational in time to submit a bid to host the
2027 Climbing World Championships, a qualifying event for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games.
Please refer to Attachment E, Preliminary Project Renderings.
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC IMPACT:
In addition to the community benefits described in the “Summary of Key Terms” section below, which
are captured in the proposed term sheet, the project will bring many additional community and economic
benefits to the RDA’s Station Center redevelopment project, Salt Lake City, and the State of Utah:
•
•
Supported by a $15 million investment from the State of Utah (already appropriated).
Lends Station Center an identity and focus that aligns with the natural/cultural context of Salt
Lake City and Utah.
•Will regularly attract visitors to the district during off-peak hours and activate the neighborhood
with ~6-10 large multi-day events per year.
•
•
Provides near-term development activity at Station Center while developers for other sites are
solicited.
Will be a catalytic activation to generate excitement for the Station Center project, help attract
developers/tenants, and spur adjacent private landowners to make plans for their properties.
USA Climbing will hire 50-60 new employees.•
•USA Climbing has an estimated event-related economic impact of ~$300 million over a 10-year
period.
•USA Climbing draws many national and international visitors and brings awareness to Salt Lake
City as a world-class climbing destination.
SUMMARY OF KEY TERMS:
Lease Area
•To include building footprints and setback areas between buildings and adjacent right-of-ways
(approximately 1.12 acres)
•
•
Outdoor plaza area to be leased at no cost (approximately 0.6 acres)
These areas are highlighted in Attachment D.
Lease Term
•
•
99 years, to commence upon execution of a ground lease agreement
In last five (5) years of term - option to extend for an additional 50 years at FMV, unless
otherwise negotiated and approved
Lease Rate
•
•
Based on fee simple FMV of lease area multiplied by 5%
Annual lease rate to be escalated every 5 years based on previous 5 years’ average Consumer
Price Index (CPI), with a minimum escalation of 2% and a maximum escalation of 5% (hereafter
referred to as “escalated annual lease rate”).
Lease Abatement
The escalated annual lease rate shall be reduced according to the following schedule:•
o
o
o
o
o
Years 1-6: USA Climbing will not make any lease payments during the first six years to
account for construction and stabilization.
Year 7: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 45% of the escalated annual
lease rate.
Year 8: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 50% of the escalated annual
lease rate.
Year 9: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 55% of the escalated annual
lease rate.
Years 10-99: USA Climbing shall make annual payments that are equal to 60% of the
escalated annual lease rate.
Common Area Maintenance (CAM) Fees
•CAM fees will be collected from Station Center lessees to contribute to the cost of maintaining
public spaces in the neighborhood, including plazas, park strips, public art, alleyways, parking
facilities, etc.
•
•
Annual CAM fee for USA Climbing will be $1.50/sf of the gross floor area of the project, to be
assessed upon receipt of an occupancy permit.
The annual CAM fee shall be escalated using the same escalation method as the annual lease rate
and charged at the same reduced schedule used for the lease abatement.
Community Benefits
•The proposed lease abatement is tied to USA Climbing providing certain community benefits and
as such, if they are not provided, the lease rate will increase. A mechanism for this increase will
be specified in a future ground lease agreement.
•Some community benefits are physical improvements that will be memorialized in construction
drawings, development agreements, cost-sharing agreements, and/or use agreements. These
include:
o
o
Activation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company Building as described above.
Design, construction, and management of the outdoor plaza, which will primarily be used
for USA Climbing-hosted events and made available for use by other entities for
additional events. USA Climbing shall allow all reasonable requests by outside parties to
utilize the plaza for special events and shall not charge the City or RDA for use of the
space.
•Other community benefits are programmatic and ongoing in nature and shall be memorialized in
a 5-year community benefits plan that is provided by USA Climbing to RDA staff for their
approval, and which may be amended from time to time with prior staff approval. RDA staff will
present USA Climbing’s informational progress report to the RDA Board of Directors at the
conclusion of each 5-year plan period. At this time, the following benefits have been noted in the
Term Sheet:
o Equitable and inclusive programming that may include offerings such as youth
programming, workforce development opportunities, and access to the facility for
community members who may not otherwise have access to the sport of climbing, based
on income or other key measures.
o Transportation demand management strategies to reduce auto dependency of employees
and visitors and encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. This may
include discounted day passes for those that utilize public transit, and inclusion of
shower, locker, and bicycle storage facilities.
RDA Participation and Other Obligations
Parking – The RDA is exploring the feasibility of financing and developing a shared parking structure on
the south block of the neighborhood.
•If developed, the RDA will lease parking privileges to interested property owners and tenants,
including USA Climbing.
•If the structure is not completed by the time the USA Climbing facilities are operational, the RDA
shall lease adjacent property to USA Climbing at no cost, to be used as a temporary surface
parking lot. The planned location of the parking structure and temporary lot (if needed) is shown
in Attachment F.
Outdoor Plaza – Prior to construction, USA Climbing and the RDA will determine a cost-sharing
formula and the RDA will reimburse USA Climbing up to $1 million for agreed-upon plaza construction
costs.
Adaptive Reuse of Salt Lake Mattress Company Building – The RDA will reimburse USA Climbing
up to $6 million for design and construction costs associated with seismic upgrades and building
improvements needed to meet minimum building code requirements. After the 2020 earthquake, the RDA
made a significant investment in the stabilization of this historic warehouse with the intent to rehabilitate
and incorporate it into the Station Center development.
Demolition of Existing Structures on Site – The RDA will reimburse USA Climbing up to $120,000 for
costs related to the demolition of existing structures on site.
Environmental Remediation – The RDA will reimburse USA Climbing for the cost differential between
disposing of clean soils and contaminated soils that may be encountered on site. It is estimated that these
costs will not exceed $200,000.
Adjacent Public Improvements, Accessible Parking Spaces – USA Climbing will benefit from the
planned Station Center public improvements, to include upgraded utilities, the reconstruction of 300
South, construction of new mid-block street connections and public plazas. It is the RDA’s intent to
coordinate with USA Climbing, the design consultants, and pertinent City divisions when developing the
public improvement plans and construction phasing strategy. The RDA will identify opportunities to
incorporate accessible on-street parking spaces near the project to serve the organization’s paraclimbing
athletes.
Relocation of State Warehouse Users & Art Collection (not in term sheet) – In late 2022, the RDA
purchased multiple State-owned parcels that will make up the future USA Climbing site. As part of that
transaction, the RDA agreed to allow the State’s Department of Cultural & Community Engagement
(C&CE) to continue using the existing warehouse structure, parking lot, and small storage shed on site, as
their future permanent home is currently under construction near the State Capitol building. A handful of
C&CE employees work on site and a historic art collection is housed there. The lease agreement indicates
that this arrangement shall remain in place until 1) C&CE can move into the new facility or 2) through the
end of 2028, whichever comes first. If the RDA desires to redevelop the property before either of the
above milestones are reached, the RDA must work with C&CE to relocate the employees and art to
another site that can accommodate their needs. The RDA and C&CE leadership will work together to
identify potential locations where the art collection and office can be temporarily located until the new
C&CE facilities at the State Capitol are completed, anticipated in Fall 2026.
ASSOCIATED BUDGET REQUESTS:
The table below summarizes RDA budget impacts associated with the USA Climbing project and
attached term sheet. The planned Station Center parking structure and relocation of the State warehouse
users and art collection are listed separately as outside costs because the parking structure will not solely
benefit USA Climbing, and the State relocation would be a necessary RDA obligation for any
redevelopment project that occurs before 2027.
FINANCIAL USES IMPLEMENTATION RDA
CONTRIBUTION
Outdoor Plaza •
•
USA Climbing will fund design work.
USA Climbing will fund and implement
construction, with RDA contribution.
USA Climbing will be responsible for
management.
RDA will be responsible for maintenance,
utilizing USA Climbing CAM Fees.
USA Climbing will fund and implement
construction, with RDA contribution.
$1 million
•
•
•Adaptive Reuse of SL
Mattress Co. Building
$6 million
$120,000Demolition•USA Climbing will fund and implement
demolition, with RDA contribution.
Environmental Remediation •USA Climbing will fund and implement
remediation work, with RDA
contribution.
~$200,000 (cost
estimate)
TOTAL DIRECT CONTRIBUTION TO USA CLIMBING PROJECT ~$7,320,000
Parking Structure •
•
•
RDA exploring feasibility of ~$31 million
financing/developing structure.
USA Climbing will lease future parking
allocation from RDA.
RDA to work with State of Utah to find
new temporary location until new
permanent facility at State Capitol is
completed (currently under construction).
Relocation of State Warehouse
Users & Art Collection
~$523,000 (cost
estimate)
TOTAL OUTSIDE COSTS
NEXT STEPS:
~$31,523,000
It is requested that the Board review the proposed term sheet and consider approving via attached
resolution. In addition, budget allocations necessary to support commitments made in the term sheet have
been proposed in FY2024 Budget Amendment #2. If both the proposed term sheet and budget
amendments are approved, next steps will include the following:
•The RDA and USA Climbing will enter into an exclusive negotiation agreement to memorialize
commitments by both parties until final ground lease and development agreements can be
executed.
•
•
•
USA Climbing will refine the project design and launch a capital funding campaign to support
construction costs, with the goal of securing permits and breaking ground in Fall 2024.
RDA staff will work with USA Climbing to identify and incorporate short-term infrastructure
needs into the larger Station Center public improvements planning, funding, and design strategy.
When all conditions have been met (listed in Attachment A, Proposed Term Sheet), the RDA and
USA Climbing will finalize and execute ground lease and development agreements.
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION:
•On September 15, 2020, the RDA Board allocated $865,000 for the stabilization of the Salt Lake
Mattress Company Building.
•On November 10, 2022, the RDA Board adopted a resolution approving FY2023 Budget
Amendment #2, which provided $500,000 for the RDA to contract with the consultant team to
develop the Station Center Vision & Implementation Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Proposed Term Sheet
B. Proposed Resolution
C. Station Center Site Plan
D. Proposed Lease Area
E. Preliminary Project Renderings
F. Proposed Parking Locations
ATTACHMENT A
USA CLIMBING AT STATION CENTER
Draft Development and Ground Lease Agreement Term Sheet
Purpose
The purpose of ground leasing Redevelopment Agency property at Station Center to USA Climbing is to
help facilitate the construction of their national headquarters and training facility as well as establish an
exciting and catalytic anchor tenant for the development of Station Center.
Parties
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) and USA Climbing. USA Climbing is the national
governing body of the sport of competition climbing in the United States. USA Climbing is a non-profit
entity that promotes the disciplines of bouldering, lead and speed climbing, as well as collegiate and
paraclimbing series.
Property to be Leased
A portion of property near the southwest corner of 500 West 300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. The
lease area shall encompass building footprints, setback areas between buildings and adjacent rights-of-
way, and the outdoor plaza. An approximate depiction of the real property to be leased is shown in Exhibit
A of this document and will be referred throughout as “Lease Area.”
Project Description
The project involves the construction of a headquarters and training facility for USA Climbing, which will
include:
1. New construction of a primary structure that is about 65-75 feet tall with a roughly 45,000 sf
footprint (exact specifications subject to further stakeholder engagement). This structure will
include bouldering, lead, and speed climbing walls, as well as other support uses that are typical
of a climbing facility. Most areas of the facility will be accessible by the community; some spaces
will be reserved for the U.S. National Team’s exclusive use. The exterior building facades will
include climbing walls.
2. Rehabilitation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company building, anticipated to include
publicly facing and accessible food, beverage, and retail uses, as well as private spaces for USA
Climbing offices.
3. New construction of an outdoor plaza that will be utilized for USA Climbing-hosted competitions
as well as other non-USA Climbing events (will be designed to accommodate 3,500 – 5,000
spectators).
Lease Terms
1. Term: 99 years, to commence upon execution of a ground lease agreement. Execution of a
ground lease agreement is contingent on both parties satisfying the conditions outlined in the last
section of this document. Ownership of the improvements constructed on the Lease Area will
revert to RDA ownership at the end of the term. In the last five years of the term, USA Climbing
may exercise an option to renew the lease for an additional 50 years. The lease rate for the
additional lease period will be fair market value, unless otherwise negotiated and approved by the
administration and legislative body.
1
2. Lease Rate: As set forth in more detail below, the lease rate will be based on a portion of the fair
market value of the Lease Area and will be increased incrementally over time. The outdoor plaza
space shall not be included in the calculation of the lease rate. Stated another way, the outdoor
plaza shall be leased at no cost.
a. The annual lease rate will be the fee simple, fair market value of the Lease Area (not
including the outdoor plaza space, as determined by an RDA-commissioned appraisal)
multiplied by 5% (Annual Lease Rate). If a ground lease agreement is not executed
within 18 months of the approval of this term sheet by the RDA Board of Directors, the
RDA shall reserve the right to commission an updated appraisal on which the Annual
Lease Rate will be based.
b. The Annual Lease Rate will be increased, or escalated, every five years. This escalator is
based on the average consumer price index (CPI) rate over the previous five years, with a
minimum escalation rate of 2% and a maximum escalation rate of 5%. The first
escalation will take place at the start of the 6th year of the lease and be based on the
average CPI rate calculated for the first 1-5 years of the lease. The Annual Lease Rate,
inclusive of the escalation, shall be referred to as the “Escalated Annual Lease Rate.”
c. The Escalated Annual Lease Rate shall be reduced according to the following schedule:
i. Years 1-6: USA Climbing will not make any lease payments during the first six
years to account for construction and stabilization.
ii. Year 7: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 45% of the
Escalated Annual Lease Rate.
iii. Year 8: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 50% of the
Escalated Annual Lease Rate.
iv. Year 9: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 55% of the
Escalated Annual Lease Rate.
v. Years 10-99: USA Climbing shall make annual payments that are equal to 60% of
the Escalated Annual Lease Rate.
3. Common Area Maintenance (CAM) Fees: CAM fees will be collected from Station Center
lessees to contribute to the cost of maintaining public spaces in the neighborhood. The annual
CAM fee for USA Climbing will be $1.50 per square foot of the gross floor area of their project,
inclusive of the new structure and the Salt Lake Mattress Company Building (Annual CAM Fee).
Gross floor area shall be interpreted to mean the sum in square feet of all floors of the building,
measured from the exterior face of the exterior walls. The Annual CAM Fee will be assessed
upon USA Climbing receiving its occupancy permit, be charged at the same reduced rate as the
schedule provided in 2.c.i-v, and escalated in the same manner as outlined in 2.b.
4. Community Benefits: During the term of the lease, USA Climbing is committed to providing the
community benefits described below. The lease rate outlined above is tied to USA Climbing
providing these benefits, and as such, should USA Climbing not provide these benefits, the lease
rate will increase as specified in more detail in the agreements.
a. Equitable and inclusive programming that may include offerings such as youth
programming, workforce development opportunities, and access to the facility for
community members who may not otherwise have access to the sport of climbing, based
on income or other key measures.
b. Transportation demand management strategies to reduce auto dependency of employees
and visitors and encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. This may
2
include discounted day passes for those that utilize public transit, and inclusion of
shower, locker, and bicycle storage facilities.
c. Activation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company Building, anticipated to include –
at ground level - food and beverage and retail components that are open and clearly
accessible by the general public during regular operating hours. The second floor will
house private USA Climbing offices and the basement may be utilized for storage.
d. Design, construction, and management of the outdoor plaza, which will primarily be used
for USA Climbing-hosted events and made available for use by other entities for
additional events.
i. Design – USA Climbing shall work collaboratively with the RDA to develop the
design for the outdoor plaza, which shall be incorporated into the construction
drawings for the larger project at USA Climbing’s sole expense.
ii. Construction – The plaza shall be constructed by USA Climbing and built at the
same time as the rest of the project. Prior to construction, USA Climbing and the
RDA will determine a cost-sharing formula and the RDA will reimburse USA
Climbing for agreed-upon plaza construction costs, in an amount not to exceed
$1 million, unless a greater amount is approved by the RDA Board of Directors.
iii. Management – USA Climbing will be responsible for managing the use of the
plaza, for both USA Climbing and non-USA Climbing-hosted events. It is
anticipated that USA Climbing will host six (6) multi-day competition events per
year, in addition to smaller events associated with their programming. USA
Climbing events may take precedence over other plaza uses but when there is no
scheduling conflict, USA Climbing shall allow all reasonable requests by outside
parties to utilize the plaza for special events. USA Climbing shall not charge the
City or RDA for the use of the plaza. Other Station Center lessees that contribute
to the CAM fund will be charged a reduced rental rate for the use of the plaza.
iv. Maintenance – USA Climbing shall contribute to a CAM fund that will be
utilized to fund maintenance of the outdoor plaza, as well as other publicly
owned parks, plazas, park strips, public art, alleyways, parking facilities, etc.,
within the neighborhood. CAM fees will also be used to fund enhanced street and
sidewalk maintenance beyond the baseline City maintenance level. The RDA or
future neighborhood governance entity shall be responsible for implementing
maintenance activities funded by the CAM assessment.
e. Tracking and Reporting. Some of the community benefits described above are physical
improvements that will be memorialized in construction drawings, development
agreements, cost-sharing agreements, and/or use agreements. Others are programmatic
and ongoing in nature and shall be memorialized in a 5-year community benefits plan that
is provided by USA Climbing to RDA Staff for their approval, and which may be
amended from time to time with prior Staff approval. RDA Staff will present USA
Climbing’s informational progress report to the RDA Board of Directors at the conclusion
of each 5-year plan period.
5. Additional Terms:
a. Parking: The RDA is exploring the feasibility of financing and developing a shared
parking structure on the south block of the neighborhood.
i. If developed, the RDA will lease parking privileges to interested property owners
and tenants, including USA Climbing, based on operational needs, estimated
demand, and parking management best practices.
3
ii. If the parking structure is not completed by the time the USA Climbing project is
operational, the RDA shall lease adjacent RDA-owned property to USA
Climbing at no cost for a temporary surface parking lot. USA Climbing shall be
responsible for funding and constructing all site improvements necessary for the
surface parking lot. The planned location of the parking structure and temporary
surface parking lot (if needed) is shown in Exhibit B.
iii. Should the parties need surface parking for an extended period, the parties will
work together to negotiate a solution to accommodate USA Climbing’s parking
needs within one block of their facility, with the goal of ultimately eliminating
the surface parking lot.
b. Salt Lake Mattress Building: As part of the construction of the project, USA Climbing
will take on the responsibility of paying the up-front costs of rehabilitating the historic
Salt Lake Mattress Building. Subject to future Board approval, the RDA will reimburse
USA Climbing up to $6 million for design and construction costs associated with seismic
upgrades and building improvements needed to meet minimum building code
requirements, unless a greater amount is approved by the RDA Board of Directors.
c. Demolition of Existing Buildings: The Lease Area currently contains existing structures.
USA Climbing will take on the responsibility of paying the up-front costs of demolition.
Subject to future Board approval, the RDA will reimburse USA Climbing up to $120,000
for these costs, unless a greater amount is approved by the RDA Board of Directors.
d. Contaminated Soil Disposal: It is possible that USA Climbing will encounter soils
contaminated with semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) during excavation for their
building. Potentially contaminated soils should be screened and stockpiled during
excavation and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws. USA Climbing will take
on the responsibility of paying the up-front costs of disposing of contaminated soils, and,
subject to future Board approval, the RDA will reimburse USA Climbing for the cost
differential associated with transporting and disposing of contaminated soil versus non-
contaminated soil. It is anticipated that the cost differential will not exceed $200,000.
e. RDA to Develop Certain Adjacent Public Improvements: As part of the planned
redevelopment of the neighborhood, RDA will design and install utilities with increased
capacity to support increased density, reconstruct 300 South between 500 West and 600
West, and extend the City grid by building out new midblock street connections, as
illustrated in Exhibit C. It is the RDA’s intent to coordinate with USA Climbing, the
design consultants, and pertinent City divisions when developing plans for the public
improvements adjacent to USA Climbing’s lease area.
i. Accessible Parking Spaces – The RDA recognizes that USA Climbing works
with paraclimbing athletes who may require special accommodation. As such, the
RDA commits to working with USA Climbing to identify opportunities to
incorporate accessible on-street parking spaces near the project, along the
planned Market Street alignment.
Conditions to Execution of Lease and Development Agreements
•
•
USA Climbing to receive approval of these development agreement and lease terms by the RDA
Board of Directors.
Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, including any applicable RDA policies such
as the Sustainable Development and Public Art policies. If any waivers of RDA policies are
requested, such waivers must be considered by the RDA Board of Directors.
4
•
•
The Project shall align with the RDA’s administrative design review process, which shall require
RDA’s review and approval to ensure the design and development plans are consistent with the
term sheet.
USA Climbing to receive all City approvals required to construct the Project, including obtaining
any necessary zoning approvals from the City’s Planning Division and a will-issue demolition
and building permit from the City’s Building Services Division.
•
•
USA Climbing to provide evidence of insurance in such amounts and coverage as deemed
necessary by the RDA.
Parties agree on the form of a Development Agreement, which shall include, but is not limited to:
o USA Climbing’s commitment to construct the Project consistent with the RDA Board-
approved term sheet, all City approvals, and a schedule of development.
An RDA-approved community benefit plan/strategy.
RDA to approve USA Climbing’s financial sources and uses and firm financial
commitments for sources of funding and donations consistent with the schedule of
development.
o
o
o
o
USA Climbing’s commitment to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
An obligation for USA Climbing to provide the RDA quarterly progress reports on the
construction of the Project.
o Remedies should USA Climbing not comply with the terms of the Development
Agreement may include, but not be limited to, filing a breach of contract claim,
terminating the ground lease, damages, injunctive relief, or any other remedies available
at law.
•Parties to agree on the form of a Lease Agreement, which shall include, but is not limited to:
o
o
USA Climbing’s obligation to pay the applicable Lease Rate and CAM fees.
USA Climbing’s commitment to maintain the Project, during the term, consistent with the
RDA-Board approved term sheet.
o USA Climbing shall not be permitted to assign the lease to an unaffiliated entity without
the RDA’s consent, which may be withheld at the RDA’s sole discretion.
Submission and approval of the community benefits plan.
An obligation for USA Climbing to provide the RDA annual progress reports on the
performance of the public benefits.
o
o
o
o
Continual operation of USA Climbing’s headquarters, outdoor plaza, and activation of the
Salt Lake Mattress Building consistent with the term sheet and the community benefits
plan.
Remedies should USA Climbing not comply with the terms of the Lease Agreement may
include, but not be limited to, filing a breach of contract claim, terminating the ground
lease, increasing the Lease Rate, damages, injunctive relief, or any other remedies
available at law.
•Receive approval from the RDA and City Attorney’s Office on all matters pertaining to the
legality, sufficiency, and form and substance of all other documents that are deemed reasonably
necessary for the execution of the transaction.
5
Exhibit A: Lease Area
6
Exhibit B: Proposed Future Parking Areas
Temporary Surface
Parking Lot
Shared Parking
Structure
7
Exhibit C: Planned Neighborhood Midblock Street Connections
8
ATTACHMENT B
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
RESOLUTION NO. _______________
Authorizing Lease Rate and Terms for USA Climbing Headquarters and Training Facility
at Approximately 500 West 300 South
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF SALT LAKE CITY AUTHORIZING LEASE RATE AND TERMS FOR USA CLIMBING
HEADQUARTERS AND TRAINING FACILITY AT RDA-OWNED PROPERTY AT
APPROXIMATELY 500 WEST 300 SOUTH IN THE DEPOT DISTRICT PROJECT AREA.
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) desires to ground
lease real property located at approximately 500 West and 300 South in Salt Lake City
(Property) for the purpose of redeveloping it in a manner consistent with RDA’s Depot District
Project Area Plan.
WHEREAS, USA Climbing (USAC), a non-profit and national governing body of the
sport of competition climbing in the United States, intends to ground lease the Property from the
RDA and construct their national headquarters and training facility (Project) at the Property. The
Project will also include certain public benefits including equitable and inclusive programming,
transportation demand management strategies, use and activation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress
Company building, and construction of an outdoor plaza to be utilized for USAC-hosted
competitions as well as other non-USAC community events. Certain details of the Project, ground
lease terms, and public benefits are more particularly described on the term sheet attached as
Exhibit A (Term Sheet).
WHEREAS, the RDA is willing to provide USAC a below-market ground lease of the
Property to facilitate the development of the Project in exchange for USAC’s commitment to
develop and maintain the public benefits in the Project as detailed on the Term Sheet.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City that the Board approves the terms outlined on the
Term Sheet for the Project and that the Board authorizes the RDA administration to negotiate the
final agreements consistent with the Term Sheet or more beneficial to the RDA, and execute the
ground lease and any other relevant documents consistent with this Resolution and incorporating
such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney’s office.
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, this
____ day of , 202 .
_________________________________
, Chair
Approved as to form:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Allison Parks
The Executive Director:
____ does not request reconsideration
____ requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting.
________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Attest:
________________________
City Recorder
EXHIBIT A
TERM SHEET
ATTACHMENT C
STATION CENTER SITE PLAN
ATTACHMENT D
PROPOSED LEASE AREA
ATTACHMENT E
PRELIMINARY PROJECT RENDERINGS
ATTACHMENT F
PROPOSED PARKING LOCATIONS
City Creek Daylighting
at Folsom Trail
SLC RDA Board of Directors
Salt Lake City, UT
Context
Project Site
City Creek
Context
4 4
2
3
1
0
0
0
W
E
S
T
FOLSOM AVE.
11
1
66
2
5
12
5
16
16
17
3
6
5
6
5
5
16
5
65
6
5
6
16
16
16
5
6
16
11
10 16
5
6
16
5
12
6
5
16
A3
LA40215
1515 LANDSCAPING - 1000 WEST NODE
21
21
EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CONCRETE TRAIL - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CRUSHED STONE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B4/LA401
RAILROAD TIE ACCENT - SEE DETAIL B4/LA402
BENCH - TYPE A - SEE DETAIL A1/LA401
BENCH - TYPE B - SEE DETAIL A3/LA401
RAILROAD TIE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B2/LA401
TRASH RECEPTACLE - SEE DETAIL A4/LA401
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (PROVIDE 1` 6" MIN. FROM FACE
OF CURB TO OVERHEAD LIGHT) - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
BOLLARD LIGHTS - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER FREEWAY UNDERPASS
LANDSCAPE BOULDERS - SEE DETAIL B1/LA401
METAL EDGING - SEE DETAIL B3/LA401
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
RELOCATED EXISTING BENCH
EXISTING CITY CREEK BOX CULVERT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
PATHWAY BOLLARD LIGHTS
MATCHLINE
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER
FREEWAY UNDERPASS
BOX CULVERT
RAIL ROAD TIE PAVING
PHASE 1 NODES
CRUSHED STONE
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
CONTRACTOR TO MEET ALL
MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS
AND COORDINATE COLOR AND
PATTERNING WITH SALT LAKE CITY
APPROXIMATE AREA OF
CONTAMINATED SOILS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
Designed By
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
CADD Filename
Sheet No.
UTA Contract No.
DrawingSALT LAKE CITY
SLC_MUP_1
FOLSOM TRAIL
18-23997P
TC
TC
KR, MP
TS
1. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF PERTINENT SITE
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED UNDER OTHER
SECTIONS. IF ANY PART OF THIS PLAN CANNOT
BE FOLLOWED DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS,
CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
2. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL AND LIGHTING PLANS.
LA101 Site Materials Plan.dwg
90
0
W
E
S
T
2
7 12
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
15
6
9
8
10
6
7
36
12
5
5
15
11
5
9
16
11
16
9
16
16
16
17
5
16
6
6
5
12
6516
5
6
16
5
6
16
5
4
44
6
5
16
6
16
2 5 6
6
16 5 6
7
2
5
'
M
I
N
.
2
5
'
M
I
N
.
LANDSCAPING - 900 WEST NODE
LANDSCAPING - 900 WEST NODE
21 21
EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CONCRETE TRAIL - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CRUSHED STONE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B4/LA401
RAILROAD TIE ACCENT - SEE DETAIL B4/LA402
BENCH - TYPE A - SEE DETAIL A1/LA401
BENCH - TYPE B - SEE DETAIL A3/LA401
RAILROAD TIE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B2/LA401
TRASH RECEPTACLE - SEE DETAIL A4/LA401
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (PROVIDE 1` 6" MIN. FROM FACE
OF CURB TO OVERHEAD LIGHT) - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
BOLLARD LIGHTS - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER FREEWAY UNDERPASS
LANDSCAPE BOULDERS - SEE DETAIL B1/LA401
METAL EDGING - SEE DETAIL B3/LA401
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
RELOCATED EXISTING BENCH
EXISTING CITY CREEK BOX CULVERT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
PATHWAY BOLLARD LIGHTS
MATCHLINE
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER
FREEWAY UNDERPASS
BOX CULVERT
RAIL ROAD TIE PAVING
PHASE 1 NODES
CRUSHED STONE
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
CONTRACTOR TO MEET ALL
MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS
AND COORDINATE COLOR AND
PATTERNING WITH SALT LAKE CITY
APPROXIMATE AREA OF
CONTAMINATED SOILS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
Designed By
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
CADD Filename
Sheet No.
UTA Contract No.
DrawingSALT LAKE CITY
SLC_MUP_1
FOLSOM TRAIL
18-23997P
TC
TC
KR, MP
TS
1. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF PERTINENT SITE
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED UNDER OTHER
SECTIONS. IF ANY PART OF THIS PLAN CANNOT
BE FOLLOWED DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS,
CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
2. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL AND LIGHTING PLANS.
LA101 Site Materials Plan.dwg
JE
R
E
M
Y
S
T
.
12 114
3
6
6
15
6
6
12
11
5
15
12
6
16
16
3
16
5
5
6
17
16
5
16
5
6
16
5
16
6
151665
16
5
6
16
6
5
16
5
16 6
5
6
5
16
16
15
15
2
5
'
M
I
N
.
LANDSCAPING - JEREMY ST.
LANDSCAPING - JEREMY ST.
2121
EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CONCRETE TRAIL - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CRUSHED STONE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B4/LA401
RAILROAD TIE ACCENT - SEE DETAIL B4/LA402
BENCH - TYPE A - SEE DETAIL A1/LA401
BENCH - TYPE B - SEE DETAIL A3/LA401
RAILROAD TIE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B2/LA401
TRASH RECEPTACLE - SEE DETAIL A4/LA401
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (PROVIDE 1` 6" MIN. FROM FACE
OF CURB TO OVERHEAD LIGHT) - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
BOLLARD LIGHTS - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER FREEWAY UNDERPASS
LANDSCAPE BOULDERS - SEE DETAIL B1/LA401
METAL EDGING - SEE DETAIL B3/LA401
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
RELOCATED EXISTING BENCH
EXISTING CITY CREEK BOX CULVERT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
PATHWAY BOLLARD LIGHTS
MATCHLINE
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER
FREEWAY UNDERPASS
BOX CULVERT
RAIL ROAD TIE PAVING
PHASE 1 NODES
CRUSHED STONE
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
CONTRACTOR TO MEET ALL
MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS
AND COORDINATE COLOR AND
PATTERNING WITH SALT LAKE CITY
APPROXIMATE AREA OF
CONTAMINATED SOILS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
Designed By
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
CADD Filename
Sheet No.
UTA Contract No.
DrawingSALT LAKE CITY
SLC_MUP_1
FOLSOM TRAIL
18-23997P
TC
TC
KR, MP
TS
1. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF PERTINENT SITE
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED UNDER OTHER
SECTIONS. IF ANY PART OF THIS PLAN CANNOT
BE FOLLOWED DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS,
CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
2. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL AND LIGHTING PLANS.
LA101 Site Materials Plan.dwg
80
0
W
E
S
T
2
4
12
3
12
10
1
1
6
7
8
9
4
7
6
12
6
12
6
5
3
15
2
11
5
6
2
16
16
1717
5
16
6
6
5
16
6
16
5 6
5
5
6
16
16
16 6
16
9
5
11
16
5
16
5
16
6
5
5
5
16
6
5
16
5
6
5
21
21
LANDSCAPING - 800 WEST
LANDSCAPING - 800 WEST
EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CONCRETE TRAIL - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP - SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
CRUSHED STONE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B4/LA401
RAILROAD TIE ACCENT - SEE DETAIL B4/LA402
BENCH - TYPE A - SEE DETAIL A1/LA401
BENCH - TYPE B - SEE DETAIL A3/LA401
RAILROAD TIE PAVING - SEE DETAIL B2/LA401
TRASH RECEPTACLE - SEE DETAIL A4/LA401
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (PROVIDE 1` 6" MIN. FROM FACE
OF CURB TO OVERHEAD LIGHT) - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
BOLLARD LIGHTS - SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER FREEWAY UNDERPASS
LANDSCAPE BOULDERS - SEE DETAIL B1/LA401
METAL EDGING - SEE DETAIL B3/LA401
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
RELOCATED EXISTING BENCH
EXISTING CITY CREEK BOX CULVERT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS
EXISTING STREET LIGHTS
PATHWAY BOLLARD LIGHTS
MATCHLINE
EXISTING LIGHTS UNDER
FREEWAY UNDERPASS
BOX CULVERT
RAIL ROAD TIE PAVING
PHASE 1 NODES
CRUSHED STONE
THERMOPLASTIC CROSSING
CONTRACTOR TO MEET ALL
MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENTS
AND COORDINATE COLOR AND
PATTERNING WITH SALT LAKE CITY
APPROXIMATE AREA OF
CONTAMINATED SOILS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION
Designed By
Drawn By
Checked By
Approved By
CADD Filename
Sheet No.
UTA Contract No.
DrawingSALT LAKE CITY
SLC_MUP_1
FOLSOM TRAIL
18-23997P
TC
TC
KR, MP
TS
1. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF PERTINENT SITE
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED UNDER OTHER
SECTIONS. IF ANY PART OF THIS PLAN CANNOT
BE FOLLOWED DUE TO SITE CONDITIONS,
CONTACT OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
2. COORDINATE WITH CIVIL AND LIGHTING PLANS.
LA101 Site Materials Plan.dwg
Prior Design
Site & Existing Conditions
800 W
900 W
Segment 1
Segment 2
Plaza
1000 W
Design
Mountain Stream
Jordan River
Diversion Point
Site
Water System
Water Concept
Stream ChannelStream Channel Pond
Cascade Mountain Pond Concept
10
0
0
W
100 S
9
0
0
W
8
0
0
W
I-
1
5
Je
r
e
m
y
S
t
Inspriation
Rail Yard Train Cars
Overall Site Plan
Main Segment
(Active)Seconardy Segment
(Natural/Passive)
Main Plaza
(Urban)
Stream ChannelStream Channel
10
0
0
W
100 S
Folsom St
S Temple
9
0
0
W
8
0
0
W
I-
1
5
I-
1
5
Je
r
e
m
y
S
t
Pond & Stream
1000 W to 900 W
Potential Street MaterialADA RampWidened Planting Strip
Seating Area Amphitheater Seating
Mid-Block Entry
Seating Area
Stream Channel
Secondary Path Existing TrailTables & Chairs
Narrowed Crossing Distance
Micro Plazas Bridges Amphitheater Seating
10
0
0
W
9
0
0
W
Folsom St
Conceptual Section
Seating Area
Bioswale
Stream Overlook
Stream Channel
Existing Trail
Amphitheater SeatingAmphitheater Seating
900 W to 800 W
Small Plaza w/Seat Wall
Shade Trees
Micro Plaza
Existing Path Entry Plaza
Stream Channel
Future Adjacent Property
Access/Use Zone
Secondary Path
Bridge
Plaza/Seating Area
Seatwalls
Tables & Chairs
9
0
0
W
8
0
0
W
Je
r
e
m
y
S
t
Main Plaza
Entry Area
Future Play /
Skate Area
(TBD)
Pond
Cascade
Gravel Seating Area
Moveable Wooden Benches
Paving Accent Bands
Seating Nooks
Bike Lane
Street Trees
Mounded Planting Areas
Permeable Pavers
Bridge
Stream Channel
Conceptual Sections
Movable Benches
Micro Plazas
Promenade
Raised Planter Screen
Wood Benches
Planting Areas
Planting Areas OverlookSeat Walls
Bridge
Pond
Cascade
Stream Channel
Material Palette / Inspriation
WOOD
BENCHES
AMPHITHEATER
SEATING
MAIN
BRIDGE
SECONDARY
STREAM
CROSSINGS
ICONIC
PLAY AREA /
PUBLIC ART
MOVEABLE
FURNITURE
PAVING
PATTERNS
URBAN
CANOPY
SEATWALLS
Seatwalls | Benches
Straight C-CurveS-Curve
Wood Topper
Concrete
Pavers
Folsom Street
Folsom Street
Planted BulboutsNarrowed Crossing Distance
24’ Travel Lane
Expanded Planting Strip Extended Curb/Narrowed
Crossing Distance
Parallel ParkingStreet Trees Raised Crosswalk
Folsom Street
Existing
Redesigned
Public Art
Potential Public Art Locations
Potential Street-Crossing ArtPotential Building Murals Potential Lighting &
Murals Installations
(beneath highway)
Public Art Ideas
OVERPASS
MURALS
OVERPASS
LIGHTING
BUILDING
MURALS
STREET
ART
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCRDA.COM
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL
Executive Director DANNY WALZ
Director
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
DATE: November 22, 2023
PREPARED BY: Lauren Parisi, RDA Senior Project Manager
RE: City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail
REQUESTED ACTION: Briefing regarding the City Creek Daylighting Design Plan
POLICY ITEM: North Temple Project Area
BUDGET IMPACTS: N/A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In June of 2022, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“RDA”)
began working with the consulting team including CRSA Architecture Planning and Design, Bio-West
Engineering, Avenue Consultants and Seven Canyons Trust (“Consultant”) to complete a “Design Plan” to
daylight (bring to the surface) a portion of City Creek that runs underground within a culvert just north of
the Folsom Trail from approximately 700 West to 1000 West. Originally recommended in Salt Lake City’s
1992 Open Space Plan, the daylighting of City Creek along Folsom Trail is envisioned to revitalize the
former rail corridor into a thriving ecosystem and active community connection. As the preliminary design
planning effort comes to a close, this memo provides a summary of the design process and plan
(Attachment A) as well as next steps regarding implementation.
DESIGN PLAN EFFORT:
Technical Analysis. The City Creek Daylighting Design Plan builds off the Feasibility Study, published in
June of 2020, that identified multiple concepts for daylighting the creek. The Consultant was directed to
move forward with design of the first concept, which features an eight-foot-wide partial-flow stream
channel. To do this, the Consultant conducted a detailed technical analysis of water quality data, flow data
and soil samples. Current site conditions were also analyzed including existing infrastructure and grading
along the trail. The results of this research are included under the Technical Analysis section of the Design
Plan.
Community Engagement. In addition to the technical analysis, the Consultant completed a robust
community engagement effort to better understand the community’s vision for the City Creek at Folsom
Trail. Engagement was phased to provide check-in points with the community throughout the design
process, which included conducting multiple surveys, a stakeholder forum and a final design walk. In
addition to engaging with the public, a technical advisory committee comprised of local experts provided
feedback at critical points in the design process. More detailed information, including the results of the
community engagement, is included under the Community Engagement section of the Design Plan.
2
City Creek Design. The final design plan features three distinct segments of creek/trail referred to as “The
Active,” “The Natural” and “The Plaza.” The design language is inspired by the corridor’s previous identity
as the Folsom rail-line. Secondary paths, plazas, and plantings find their shape from the interchanges and
switches in a rail yard, while plantings, pavers, and seating draw from the stacked and linear boxes of train
cars. The new channel will begin at a basin on the Plaza segment to store water for a constant base flow and
reduce peak runoff by storing flow during peak periods. Paying homage to the creek’s canyon headwaters,
a cascade at the inflow will oxygenate the water to prevent stagnation and related water quality issues.
Wetland and riparian vegetation will enhance water quality before entering the more confined channel.
The creek will then move into a channel with a continuous baseflow of approximately two to four cubic
feet per second. The bottom of the channel will have coarse gravel and small cobbles with riparian
vegetation growing on the banks. The channel will need to cross several existing roadways utilizing
traditional culverts, inverted siphons, or other cost-effective options.
In addition to the comprehensive design concept, the Consultant has produced construction drawings
considered to be 40% complete. This includes elements such as the proposed width and grade of the
constructed creek, drainage aspects, landscaping details, paving design and pedestrian amenities.
3
NEXT STEPS: Project implementation will be phased. The first phase includes the installation of
landscaping, irrigation, and certain amenities by the Public Lands Department. These improvements will be
primarily adjacent to the trail and focused on intersections and other nodes. This will occur within the
“Folsom Corridor,” from 1000 West to 800 West, along South Temple from 800 to 600 West, and all the
way to the North Temple FrontRunner Station. Design and construction of these first phase, trail-oriented
improvements are funded by a $2 million allocation of the voter-approved General Obligation (GO) Bond
for Parks, Trails, and Open Space. Construction may begin in 2024 or 2025.
Subsequent phases will include additional landscaping improvements to support a new creek channel, and
diverting City Creek waters from the buried culvert to the surface. It is anticipated that multiple funding
sources, including the RDA’s North Temple project area funds, federal grants, and philanthropic dollars,
will be needed to cover the total estimated project cost of approximately $12.1 million. The RDA, in
collaboration with other city departments, will work to identify these funding sources for finalizing the
design and implementing the creek daylighting.
ATTACHMENT:
Attachment A – City Creek Daylighting Design Plan
A Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City & Seven Canyons Trust
Collaboration.
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
2
3
.
DAYLIGHTING
DESIGN PLAN.
Thank you to our partners and
funders who made the this plan
possible, and a special thank
you to the many community
members who participated in
the process and contributed to
the document. All photographs
and graphics courtesy of the
Seven Canyons Trust or CRSA,
unless otherwise noted.
Seven Canyons Trust — Brian Tonetti & Jess
Lofland
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City — Cara
Lindsley & Lauren Parisi
CRSA — Kelly Gillman, Bradley Kraushaar,
Kenneth Sanhueza, Laura Smith, & Cooper
Parson
Avenue Consultants — Stacee Adams &
Thomas McMurtry
BIO-WEST, Inc. — Christopher Sands
Land Acknowledgment.
The stream, colloquially
known as City Creek, flows
through the ancestral lands of
the Eastern Shoshone Tribe,
Goshute Indian Tribe,
Northwestern Band of the
Shoshone Nation, Ute Indian
Tribe, and Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes [01]. The stream’s
native names include nah-
poh-pah (unknown language)
and so’ho-gwa (Shoshoni
language) [02].
Partners & Funders.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan02
T
E
A
M
.
Technical Advisory Committee.
Project Management Team.
Salt Lake City Public Lands — Tom Millar, Tyler
Murdock, & Makaylah Respicio-Evans
Salt Lake City Public Utilities — Michael
Guymon, Jason Draper, & Holly Lopez
Salt Lake City Planning — Rylee Hall
Salt Lake City Transportation — Will Becker
Utah State University — Ryan Dupont
University of Utah — Jenn Follstad Shah
Residents & Business Owners — Paulo Aguilera
& Victoria Karpos
Redevelopment Agency of
Salt Lake City
Seven Canyons Trust
Crocker Catalyst Foundation
Willard L. Eccles Charitable
Foundation
Danuel Stanger
Kevin & Alice Steiner
Dominion Energy
George S. & Dolores Doré
Eccles Foundation
Rocky Mountain Power
Grant Kesler
Scandia
Snell & Wilmer
Zeke Dumke III
Sources:
[01]Seven Canyons Trust, Land
Acknowledgment (2020).
[02]Stansbury, Map of the Great
Salt Lake and Adjacent Country in
the Territory of Utah (1852); and
Chamberlin, Place and Personal
Names of the Gosiute Indians of Utah
(1913).
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
.
Section 01.City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
City Creek on North Temple, circa 1867. Photo credit: Utah
State Historical Society.
The City Creek at Folsom Trail
Daylighting Design Plan is a
community-based vision for
City Creek and additional
improvements along the
Folsom Trail between 700 West
and 1000 West in the Poplar
Grove neighborhood of Salt
Lake City.
This plan follows the City Creek
Daylighting Feasibility Study
published in June 2020, which
identified two concepts for the
daylighting of City Creek along
the Folsom Trail. Each originate
at a pond to be located on City-
owned property at 39 South
800 West. The first concept
was deemed most feasible by
a collaborative team of Salt
Lake City departments, which
features an approximately
eight-foot-wide partial-flow
stream channel.
daylighting
[dey-lahy-ting]
verb - The
uncovering
of a stream
previously
buried in a pipe
or culvert.
City Creek at Folsom Trail will
revitalize a former rail corridor
into a thriving ecosystem
and community connection
to create a beautiful, safe,
and welcoming community
centerpiece with more access
to nature, improved water
quality, and mitigated surface
area flooding.
The City Creek at Folsom Trail
Daylighting Design Plan is a
collaboration between the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City and Seven Canyons
Trust. CRSA, in partnership
with BIO-WEST and Avenue
Consultants, were selected to
assist with the plan’s creation.
Relevant plans and documents:
Open Space Plan (1992)
North Temple Boulevard Plan
(2010)
Westside Master Plan (2014)
Pedestrian & Bicycle Master
Plan (2015)
City Creek Daylighting
Feasibility Study (2020)
Mission & Vision.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan06
RAIL TO
The Folsom Trail is an off-
street, paved trail located at 50
South (between South Temple
and 100 South) from the North
Temple FrontRunner Station
to the Jordan River Trail in Salt
Lake City. West of Interstate-15,
it follows a former railroad
right-of-way, acquired by Salt
Lake City in 2007-2008. The
first phase was completed
in 2022, which included
installation of the trail to 1000
West, lighting, crossings, and
some site furniture.
The Salt Lake City Open Space
Bond, approved in 2022,
allocated approximately $5
million towards the completion
of the Folsom Trail between
1000 West and the Jordan River.
Additional property acquisition
may be required to make this
connection [03]. Remaining
funds will be put towards
landscaping, amenities, and/
or creek daylighting.
Folsom Trail.
CREEK & TRAIL.
Left to right: Folsom Trail looking east at 800 West. Folsom Trail looking west at
800 West. Folsom Trail looking east at 1000 West.
As Salt Lake City urbanized at
the turn of the 20th Century,
the Plat of Zion was imposed
on the geography of the
Wasatch Front. Houses were
concentrated along creeks
and floodplains for its water
source and cooling in the
summertime. However, spring
brought snowmelt and, with it,
flooding. Floodwaters ravaged
fields and houses along the
banks.
Instead of relocating houses
out of the floodplain to
prevent damage, creeks were
channelized as they entered
the broad valley bottom,
straightening the previously
meandering channels. In 1856,
the two branches of City Creek
were combined into a 12-foot
ditch down the middle of North
Temple [04]. This caused banks
to steepen and erode, creating
History.
State Fairpark [05].
Even at that time, residents
lamented the loss of the creek
through downtown. From a
1921 Deseret News article:
“To hide completely the
flowing water within a
conduit and to make of [North
Temple] a stretch of ordinary
pavement would be to throw
away opportunity for which
many cities would gladly pay
a million dollars” [06].
Daylighting Salt Lake City’s
creeks gained traction after
the devastating 1983 floods,
which saw City Creek flow in
a sandbagged channel down
State Street. The 1992 Open
Space Plan highlighted a route
for City Creek that would flow
from Memory Grove, through
the downtown core, into what
would become The Gateway,
and finally through the Folsom
rail corridor on its way to the
Jordan River [07].
In 1995, the transformation of
a surface parking lot into what
is now City Creek Park began.
A public-private partnership
between Salt Lake City and
the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints exchanged
the ownership of the lot for
rights to underground parking.
a safety issue for early settlers.
The City’s creeks became the
early sewer system due to
their hydrology, flowing east-
west out of the city. Pollution
from sewage, agriculture,
and industry degraded water
quality. Many of the early
canals, diversions, and dams
left channels devoid of water.
Regarded as a nuisance, this
led to the burial of many
portions of Salt Lake City’s
creeks. Completed in 1914, the
City Creek aqueduct transports
creek water underground from
Memory Grove to the Jordan
River—spilling out at the Utah
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan09Images left to right: City Creek burial on North Temple in 1910. City Creek flooding
on State Street in 1983. Grant Tower exchange of Folsom rail-line in 1952. Photo
credit: Utah State Historical Society & Richard Kindig.
Benches, green space, and a
stone-lined creek create an
oasis in the heart of downtown
Salt Lake City. The creek
daylighting was extended
onto Canyon Road upstream
towards Memory Grove and
later downstream onto North
Temple adjacent to the Church
Conference Center in 2000 [04].
In 2006, the United States Army
Corps of Engineers initiated a
feasibility study to extend the
creek daylighting down the
Folsom rail corridor [08]. The
Folsom rail line was realigned
in 2007 to 2008. And, in 2011,
an overflow culvert was placed
down the corridor to mitigate
flooding [09]. For a variety of
reasons, the feasibility study
was never approved, and
momentum waned. Renewed
interest, including a 2020
feasibility study led by Salt
Lake City and the design and
construction of the Folsom
Trail, reinvigorated the project.
10
Sources:
[03] Salt Lake
City, Parks, Trail,
and Open Space
Bond (2023).
[04] BIO-
WEST, Riparian
Corridor Study:
City Creek
Management
Plan (2010).
[05] Watson,
The Stream
That Built a City
(1995).
[06] Deseret
News, City
Creek Should Be
Preserved (1921).
[07] Salt Lake
City, Open Space
Plan (1992).
[08] URS, Euclid
Small Area
Master Plan
(2006).
[09] J-U-B,
Folsom Avenue
Storm Drain
Project (2011).
City Creek daylighting at City Creek Park in Salt Lake City.
Section 02.City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
City Creek daylighting on Canyon Road in Salt Lake City.
EXISTING CONDITIONS & TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.
City Creek is a 15-mile small,
mountainous stream that
flows from City Creek Canyon,
through the Capitol Hill,
Greater Avenues, Downtown,
Fairpark, and Poplar Grove
neighborhoods of Salt Lake
City, and into the Jordan River.
The creek is characterized
by a steep gradient within
the canyon and confined
and partially confined valley
settings. The upper canyon
demonstrates natural step-pool
morphology with gravel-cobble
and occasional boulder stream
bed. The creek transitions to
steep pool-riffle form in the
lower canyon [09].
The banks support a robust
riparian ecosystem of native
mature trees and shrubs. As the
creek flows into the valley, it
winds through a series of parks
and open spaces, including City
Creek Natural Area, Memory
Grove, Canyon Road, and City
cubic feet per
second
(cfs)
A measurement
for flow rate or
discharge in a
stream equal to
one cubic foot
of water per
second.
Creek Park, with riparian-
associated and ornamental
species.
The City Creek watershed
drains approximately 24.7
square miles. The flow is
snowmelt-driven with peak
discharge between May and
Downstream of West
Temple, the creek continues
underground beneath North
Temple in the North Temple
Conduit to the Jordan River.
There is a diversion at
approximately 600 West that
has the ability to split flows
between the North Temple
Conduit and the Folsom Drain.
The Folsom Drain runs between
the Folsom Drain Junction Box,
beneath the Folsom Trail, to the
Jordan River.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan14
June. Average peak flow is 45
cubic feet per second (cfs) and
average low flow is three cubic
feet per second [10]. The highest
recorded flow was 322 cfs in
1983 [09]. Salt Lake County
currently measures flow at
Memory Grove Park (1961 to
1963 and 1969 to present).
Key.
Soil Sample - No Concern Water Quality Sample
Soil Sample - Concern Design Plan
Figure 01. Map of Folsom Corridor.
F E D C B A
Folsom Trail
Folsom Drain
North Temple Culvert
Folsom Trail - Proposed
Folsom Trail - Detour
Segments
16
The City Creek Daylighting
Feasibility Study analyzed
daylighting City Creek’s flow
within the Folsom corridor.
The corridor was divided into
six segments (Figure 01). Three
concepts were recommended:
Concept 01. Daylight only
the base flow in City Creek—
approximately two to four
cubic feet per second.
Concept 02. Daylight the
full design flow of the four-
foot by 12-foot box culvert
underneath the corridor,
the Folsom Drain, at
F
E
A
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
S
T
U
D
Y
.
Image: Partial flow design concept in City Creek Daylighting
Feasibility Study. Photo credit: Landmark Design.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
by a team of Salt Lake City
departments to move forward
with Concept 01, the partial
flow channel, in Segments B, C,
and D (approximately 700 West
to 1000 West).
Opportunity exists in future
phases to extend the creek
channel to both upstream and
downstream segments on the
Folsom corridor. However,
grading challenges and
private property constraints
will require additional design
considerations [11].
Data Gap.
The City Creek Daylighting
Feasibility Study identified
additional data was needed to
inform this design plan. The
data gap included flow and
water quality at the North
Temple diversion box, the
Folsom Drain junction box, the
Folsom Drain at 1000 West,
and the Jordan River outfall.
Additional technical analysis
was competed to fill the
gap, which is outlined in the
following section.
approximately 150 cubic feet
per second and remove some
or all of the culvert.
Concept 03. Combine 01
and 02 to address property
constraints in Segments E
and F.
Each concept was determined
to be physically feasible.
However, the costs ranged
significantly, and the resulting
channel varied in space
needed, utilities impacted,
and water conveyed. For the
first phase, it was deemed
18 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.
As concluded in the City Creek Daylighting Feasibility Study,
additional technical analysis was needed to fill the data gap and
inform the design of the creek channel.
Water Quality.
Sampling locations included
Memory Grove, North Temple
Diversion, Detention Basin
Junction, and 1000 West (Figure
01). In 2019, two samples were
taken at Memory Grove and
North Temple Diversion during
snowmelt-driven high flow
Figure 02. City Creek Flow Rate at Memory Grove in 2022 (cfs).
by the State of Utah (6.5-
9.0), falling between 8.1 and
8.8. Turbidity was below the
State threshold (10.0) except
during spring run-off, which
is not unusual. Escherichia
coli was below the maximum
State threshold (668) except
downstream of 1000 West
where the water is stagnated
in the Folsom Drain. Coliform
and E. coli measurements are
of concern but not unusual
for this urban context. It is
important to keep the creek
flowing in the new channel to
prevent stagnant conditions.
Upstream, City Creek has two
designated uses:
Class 2B - Protected for
secondary contact recreation
(and infrequent primary
contact recreation) where
there is low bodily contact or
likelihood of ingestion, such
as paddling, wading, and
fishing.
Class 3A - Protected for cold-
water game fish species and
other aquatic life necessary
for their lifecycle.
Based on the water quality
results, a Class 2B designated
use is recommended for
the new creek channel. It is
recommended that testing
continue to quantify potential
water quality improvements
post-implementation.
Flow.
The closest continuous flow
data is measured at Memory
Grove. Additional flow
measurements were conducted
at the North Temple Diversion,
Detention Basin Junction, and
1000 West in July, September,
and October in 2022, which was
a dry year with a short peak
reaching only 16 cubic feet per
second (cfs).
Preliminary results suggest
significant groundwater
inputs between Memory Grove
and North Temple diversion,
including base flow at Memory
Grove and inflow pumped
from underground parking
downtown. It is estimated
flows double at North Temple.
However, in one instance, flow
Jan JulMar SepMay NovFebAugAprOctJun Dec
5
0
1
0
1
5
2
0
(05/02/2019) and summertime
low flow (08/08/2019). In 2022,
three samples were taken
at all four locations in July,
September, and October. Based
on samples, water quality is
typical for an urban stream.
Measurements for pH were
within the range established
20 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
Figure 03. Environmental Protection Agency Screening Levels.
Frequency
Factors
Time
250 days
Adult
8 hr.
250 days
Youth & Adult
4 hr.
350 days
Youth & Adult
24 hr.
Industrial Recreational Residential
Soils.
Properties within and around
the project area include multiple
Environmental Protection
Agency-identified brownfield
and Superfund sites, which
has resulted in contamination
of soils and groundwater.
A limited site investigation
was previously conducted in
July 2011, which identified
concentrations of Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons above
the Environmental Protection
Agency’s regional screening
levels in the several areas of the
project area.
A Phase II Environmental Site
Assessment was completed
in October 2022 to assess existing soil
contamination. The investigation was limited
to the first five feet below surface grade based
on the understanding that construction will be
limited to this area. A total of 39 distinct and four
duplicate soil samples were collected from 19
soil borings within the project area—one shallow
soil sample less than one foot below surface
grade and one deep (one to three feet and/or
three to five feet below surface grade). Samples
were analyzed for Metals (Arsenic, Barium,
Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium,
and Silver), Total Recoverable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons, Volatile Organic Compounds,
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons – Gasoline Range
Organics, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons –
Diesel Range Organics, and Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons. Recreational screening levels
were used to analyze results (Figure 03).
Soils less than one foot below surface grade
near boings SB-2, SB-3, and SB-12 contain
chemical concentrations above the recreational
screening level. Soils at three to five feet below
surface grade near SB-8 contain chemical
concentrations above the industrial screening
levels [13]. Any soil excavated in these areas
should be properly handled and disposed of at
a permitted landfill. Additional sampling and
analysis should be completed at three to five
feet below surface grade near soil boring SB-16
to determine if arsenic concentrations exceed
accepted background levels.
Sources:
[09] BIO-WEST,
Salt Lake
City Riparian
Corridor Study:
City Creek
Management
Plan (2010).
[10] Salt Lake
County, Stream
Care Guide
(2014).
[11] Salt Lake
City, City Creek
Daylighting
Feasibility Study
(2020).
[12] BIO-WEST,
City Creek
Daylighting
Project Hydrology
Summary
(2023).
[13] BIO-WEST,
Folsom Trail Soil
Contamination
Memorandum
(2022).
was 14 times bigger at North
Temple compared to Memory
Grove [12]. Groundwater inputs
support continuous flow
delivery even in below average
drier months, where values
may reach below two cfs.
New low-flow diversion baffles
were installed at North Temple
in October 2022 to better deliver
minimum flows. The one
measurement conducted after
installation shows a delivery of
2.32 cfs to the Detention Basin
Junction, which was base flow
in Memory Grove at the time [12].
However, more measurements
are needed to test baffles and
quantify groundwater inputs
downstream of Memory Grove.
Section 03.
Folsom Trail Mural Project by Roots Art Kollective.
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
E
N
G
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
Public and stakeholder
engagement provides the
structure for the City Creek at
Folsom Trail Daylighting Design
Plan. Creative community
engagement strategies were
utilized to ensure equity in
outreach and gathering the
public’s thoughts, ideas, and
visions for the future City
Creek at Folsom Trail.
All materials and engagement
opportunities were offered
in Spanish and English to
accommodate the diverse
presence within this
community. Targeted social
media advertising to zip codes
touching the trail (84101,
84103, 84104, and 84116) was
successful in reaching the
target demographic. Mailers
and two rounds of door hangers
were sent to 600 properties
buffering the corridor. Lawn
signs were placed along the trail
Engagement
Quick Facts:
Total Residents
Involved:
1,527
Surveys Collected:
265
Visual Preference
Completed:
701
Design Feedback
Comments:
65
Activation/
Engagement
Events:
13
~300’ Mural
Completed
24 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
and at key neighborhood nodes
to engage residents on their
own time. Popular community
events, like the Fisher
Mansion Beer Garden, were
utilized to maximize project
engagement. Additional fun,
creative engagement events,
like the design walks and
celebration, were hosted to
encourage further feedback
from residents. Finally, the
Folsom Trail Mural Project was
implemented with local west-
side artists to bring short-term
activation to the corridor, while
highlighting the daylighting of
City Creek and Folsom Trail.
SURVEY.
The survey was launched
September 12, 2022 and was
available until September
30, 2022. The survey was
distributed online and in-
person. Six intercept surveying
events engaged participants
along the trail, at key
community nodes, and during
popular community events.
homelessness, maintenance,
and safety (38, 33, and 31 percent,
respectively). Gentrification
and evaporation, two main
concerns identified at the
start of the project, were only
cited by 1 percent. Seventeen
percent of participants were
not concerned about the
project.
Figure 04. What would you like to see along the creek and trail? (%)Results.
Survey participants mostly
had never used the trail (46
percent). Interestingly, weekly
users were next at 23 percent.
Users mostly lived by the trail
and/or used it for walking,
biking, or rolling (both 48
percent). Some used it to
commute (21 percent) or to
shop and/or work nearby (both
17 percent). Visiting family or
friends nearby was lowest at 9
percent.
Participants prioritized seating
areas, lighting, and trash and
recycling cans, all of which
already exist along the trail.
This either underscores the
need for additional amenities
in this category or shows a lack
of use among participants.
Playgrounds were the lowest
priority. This may underscore
the safety concerns for children
expressed in the following
question.
The main concerns about the
project included unsheltered
1
0
0
2
0
3
0
4
0
5
0
There were 23 comments on
the comment map—5 from
intercept surveying and 18
online. Nine were concerns,
nine amenities, three popular
areas, and two uncategorized.
S
e
a
t
i
n
g
P
l
a
c
e
m
a
k
i
n
g
/
A
r
t
D
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
F
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
T
r
a
s
h
/
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
G
r
e
e
n
I
n
f
r
a
-
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
H
a
b
i
t
a
t
B
i
k
e
R
a
c
k
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
D
o
g
W
a
s
t
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
y
S
p
a
c
e
Image left to right: Intercept surveying at 900 West along
the Folsom Trail. Visual preference at Fisher Mansion Beer
Garden.
26 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
VISUAL PREFERENCE.
The visual preference was launched October 1, 2022 and was
available until January 6, 2023. It was distributed online and in-
person. The visual preference was also programmed at the two-
day Fisher Mansion Beer Garden, which engaged residents in-
person during this popular community festival. The Stakeholder
Forum was hosted on January 11, 2023.
Results.
The visual preference asked participants to prioritize three
elements across six categories: art and placemaking, gathering
spaces, play spaces, secondary trails, landscaping, and other.
Images were attached to the three elements to give participants
a sense of possibilities. Preference points were given to each of
the three engagement opportunities: Fisher Mansion Beer Garden
Day One, Fisher Mansion Day Two, and Online (Figure 05).
Stakeholder Forum.
Eighteen technical experts, community leaders, and municipal
staff joined the Stakeholder Forum at Sugar Space. A presentation
introduced attendees to the project, background, existing
conditions, community engagement, three characterizations:
“Urban Industrial,” “Modern Greenway,” and “Nature Corridor,”
and an early conceptual design. They were then spilt into three
categories—Water, Community, and Recreation—for individual
conversations prompted by questions about whether the
characterizations met project expectations and their preferences.
Then, the group came together for a final discussion about the
individual conversations collectively.
Figure 05. Visual preference across three engagement opportunities
1
0
Art/Placemaking Secondary TrailsGathering Spaces LandscapingPlay Spaces Other
2
3
S
c
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
S
o
i
l
P
a
v
i
l
i
o
n
G
r
e
e
n
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
N
a
t
u
r
e
P
l
a
z
a
L
i
g
h
t
G
r
a
v
e
l
B
o
a
r
d
w
a
l
k
s
N
a
t
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
T
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
S
p
l
a
s
h
P
a
d
M
u
r
a
l
P
a
v
e
d
C
r
e
a
t
i
v
e
S
e
a
t
i
n
g
X
e
r
i
s
c
a
p
e
W
o
r
k
o
u
t
D
o
g
P
a
r
k
28 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
DESIGN FEEDBACK.FOLSOM TRAIL MURAL PROJECT
Design feedback was launched
August 14, 2023 and was
available until September 15,
2023. It was distributed online
and in-person. Two design
walks toured the designs with
residents. Surveying was also
programmed at the two-day
Fisher Mansion Beer Garden,
which engaged residents in-
person during this popular
community festival. On
September 11, 2023, a separate
meeting was held with business
owners around the Folsom Trail
to gather specific feedback
from this stakeholder group.
Results.
The corridor was split into
three distinctive segments
based on the user experience
of each and amenities provided
therein:
The Plaza – ~700 to 800 West
The Natural – 800 to 900 West
The Active – 900 to 1000 West
Four questions were asked for
each segment—what excites
you, what do you dislike, what
is missing, and do you have
concerns. Some feedback was
specific for each segment, and
some was consistent across
the segments. Generally,
respondents found City
Creek, green/natural space,
trees and native vegetation,
shade, and seating areas most
exciting. They disliked the
street crossings. They thought
lighting, enforcement, and
improved street crossings
were missing. Finally, they
were most concerned with
the design attracting people
experiencing homelessness,
safety, maintenance, and
activation.
Eight business owners joined
the business owners feedback
event on September 11, 2023.
This targeted event also led
to online comments from
business owners not able to
attend the in-person meeting.
Design Walks.
Two design walks were held
Image: Folsom Trail Mural Project by Roots Art Kollective.
on September 30, 2023 to
provide in-person tours
of the design and solicit
feedback. Approximately eight
participants joined. In addition,
an outreach table was hosted at
The Plaza (35 South 800 West),
which engaged an additional
seven passersby.
Roots Art Kollective, a team of
three local Mexican-American
artists, were chosen to paint
the mural. Completed in
September 2023, it fills the
nearly 300-foot-long wall at 25
S 1000 W, overlooking the trail.
The piece creates immediate
activation and beautification—
and will stimulate further art
and placemaking efforts. The
mural compliments larger
engagement efforts on the
plan by highlighting efforts,
generating excitement, and
building support.
Section 04.
Example of timber seating proposed at The Plaza.
D
E
S
I
G
N
.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
The design language is inspired
by the corridor’s previous
identity as the Folsom rail-line.
Secondary paths, plazas, and
plantings find their shape from
the interchanges and switches
in a rail yard, while plantings,
pavers, and seating draw from
the stacked and linear boxes of
train cars.
City Creek.
The new channel will begin
at a basin to store water for a
constant base flow and reduce
peak runoff by storing flow
during peak periods. Paying
homage to the creek’s canyon
headwaters, a cascade at the
inflow will oxygenate the
water to prevent stagnation
and related water quality
issues. Wetland and riparian
vegetation will enhance water
quality before entering the
more confined channel.
City Creek
Quick Facts:
Native Name:
Nah-po-pah,
so’ho-gwa
(Goshute) [14]
Watershed Size:
24.7 sq. mi. [15]
Total Stream
Length:
14.6 mi.
Buried Length:
2.0 mi. [16]
Average Peak
Flow:
45 cfs
Key.
Native
Accent
Green Infrastructure
Meadow
Riparian
Figure 06. Final Conceptual Design.
Skate Park
Movable Benches
Restroom
Nature Play Space
Street Crossing Art
Permeable Paving
SeatwallRaised Crossing
ADA Ramp
Folsom Trail
Cascade & Pond
Paving AccentFolsom Drain
Tables & ChairsCity CreekMural
Secondary TrailRDA Property Bike Racks
Amphitheater Seating
Movable Benches
Amphitheater Seating
34 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
Figure 07. Segment Cross Sections.
The Plaza.
The Active.
Rail Tie BenchesMovable Benches
Amphitheater Seating
Seatwall Overlook Cascade
Plaza Plaza
Plaza PondPlaza
PlazaCity Creek
Plaza
Parking - 20’
Parking - 20’
Travel Lane - 25’
Travel Lane - 24’
Parking - 20’
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
1
0
’
Planting
Planting
Plaza City Creek
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
P
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
F
o
l
s
o
m
A
v
e
n
u
e
F
o
l
s
o
m
T
r
a
i
l
F
o
l
s
o
m
T
r
a
i
l
F
o
l
s
o
m
T
r
a
i
l
Folsom Avenue - Existing.
Folsom Avenue - Proposed.
36 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
The creek will then move
into a more confined channel
with a continuous baseflow
of approximately two to four
cfs. The bottom of the channel
will have coarse gravel and
small cobbles with riparian
vegetation growing on the
banks. The channel will need to
cross several existing roadways
which will utilize traditional
culverts, inverted siphons, or
other cost-effective options.
Development Design Guide.
Trail-oriented development
along the Folsom Trail and City
Creek will fulfill the desire of
residents and businesses to
live and locate along streams,
trails, and other amenities.
They will bring density to
corridor and offer additional
amenities, such as bicycle
storage, workrooms, rentals,
and shower/locker facilities,
that are not as feasible on public
lands. They offer tenants and
visitors connection to active
transportation, recreational
opportunities, and nature from
their doorstep, while blurring
the line between the corridor
and adjacent properties.
When developers integrate
goals, they also improve their
property values and bottom-
line. Ultimately, a balancing
of preservation/adaptive
reuse and new mixed-use
development will protect the
character of the neighborhood,
while diversifying housing,
jobs, and entertainment to
create a vibrant, healthy, and
thriving neighborhood.
Trail-oriented developments
should achieve many, if not all,
of the following guidelines for
successful integration into the
corridor and neighborhood:
Add indoor and outdoor
amenities at development
to offer additional facilities
to enhance user experience
(Figure 06).
Implement ADA-compliant
connector trails with
wayfinding signage on
property to make Folsom
Trail connection easy and
accessible.
Orient development, exits/
entrances, and active uses
towards the corridor to create
a bustling, lively ground-
floor.
Provide outdoor dining areas,
covered patios, and overlooks
on property adjacent to
the corridor to activate
it and increase resident
surveillance.
Put green infrastructure, such
as green roofs, rain gardens,
and bioswales, on property to
mitigate stormwater runoff
from roofs, parking lots, and
other impervious surfaces
into City Creek.
Hire local artists to paint
murals on blank walls
adjacent to the corridor that
uplift the diverse cultures on
Salt Lake City’s west-side and
add additional placemaking,
sculptural elements,
and artistic lighting at
development to beautify the
neighborhood and create a
vibrant area.
Provide an abundance of
Indoor
Outdoor
Low Cost Medium Cost High Cost
Figure 08. Amenities for developments adjacent to Folsom Trail.
Discounts for
users
Restroom use
Water refills
Bicycle pump/
tool station
Bicycle racks
Dog water bowl
Drinking water
fountain
Outdoor furniture
Pet waste station
Programming
Trash/recycling
bins
Nature play space
Outdoor exercise
equipment
Pavilion/gazebo
Playground
Public art
Trail access
Wayfinding
signage
Play field/court
Plaza
Splash pad
Stage/
amphitheater
Bicycle storage
Bicycle valet
Locker/shower
facilities
Bicycle rentals
Widened hallways
Workroom/on-
site mechanic
38 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
well-designed bike racks on
property to accommodate
cyclists using trail.
Ensure adequate, but
wildlife-friendly and dark-
sky compliant, lighting
and design principles that
provide safety for trail users
and tenants alike.
Equity.
While adaptive reuse,
preservation, and new mixed-
use developments will certainly
improve the livability of the
corridor, developers should be
mindful of equity, inclusion,
and displacement related
to gentrification. Equitable
development reduces the risk
of displacement by ensuring
housing is available and
affordable, provides jobs and
resources that benefit the
community, and fosters a sense
of pride and ownership in the
surrounding neighborhood.
Salt Lake City is developing
the Anti-Displacement Strategy,
which contains a two-year
action plan to “identifying
priority actions that the City
can take to help people stay
and thrive in our community as
we grow” [17]. These strategies
will go a long way towards
addresses challenges related to
displacement.
Individual developments
along the Folsom Trail can
also contribute to equity in
substantial ways. Affordable
housing options should
be included in each new
development to ensure
impacted residents are not
displaced. At minimum,
existing affordable housing
stock within a half-mile buffer
to the corridor should be
preserved. Developers should
also consider hiring community
stewards from the surrounding
neighborhood to assist with
engagement, programming,
and maintenance. They can
help build trust between the
community and developers
to keep residents invested
in the improvement of their
neighborhood, while creating
jobs. Stewards should be multi-
lingual and paid a living wage.
Programming.
Activation is a critical way
to improve user safety and
experience. More eyes on
the trail and creek will lead
to community surveillance
of the corridor and quicker
identification and response to
issues. Programs, events, and
gatherings will draw more
users to the corridor and bring
positive activity. Programming
can also improve inclusion
by expressing community
identity, celebrate diverse
traditions, promote shared
values, and create a sense
of place. They can showcase
underrepresented voices
and be a format for public
discourse.
Service-oriented volunteer
efforts can get students and
residents involved in on-the-
ground meaningful activity,
while meeting maintenance
requirements for municipal
departments, such as litter
clean-up, noxious weed
removal, plantings, seeding,
and more. Teachings would
develop stewardship around
the corridor and a pathway for
community members to get
involved in their neighborhood
improvement. Ultimately,
efforts build support for
implementation and ongoing
investment in these areas as
community member learn
about and appreciate the value.
Image left to right: Example of main bridge proposed at The
Plaza. Example of skate park and public art proposed at The
Plaza.
BUDGET.
The Plaza.The Plaza.The Natural.The Natural.The Active.The Active.
40 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
Demolition.
Public Art.
Soft Costs.
Market Estimate Totals.
Baseline Estimate Comparison.
Landscaping
Street & Curb
$ 46,692
Focal Sculpture
Street Crossings
Artistic Lighting
$ 120,940
$ 12,196,563
$ 8,554,277
Contingency
Overhead
Insurance
Permits & Fees
Engineering
$ 4,305,411
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 103,440
$ 2,500
$ 5,000
$ 110,940
$ 5,647,140
$ 4,477,792
$ 526,077
$ 378,775
$ 70,705
$ 176,762
$ 282,819
$ 1,435,137
$ 526,077
$ 378,775
$ 70,705
$ 176,762
$ 282,819
$ 1,435,137
$ 526,077
$ 378,775
$ 70,705
$ 176,762
$ 282,819
$ 1,435,137
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,500
$ -
$ 2,500
$ 3,075,478
$ 1,862,242
$ 45,804
$ 3,888
$ 49,692
$ -
$ 7,500
$ -
$ 7,500
$ 3,473,945
$ 2,214,243
Site Structures.
Bridges
Restroom
Rail Tie Benches
Tables & Chairs
Bike Racks
Skate Park
Nature Play
Area Lighting
$ 1,524,228
$ 152,750
$ 24,400
$ 132,703
$ -
$ 4,000
$ 699,675
$ -
$ 92,000
$ 1,105,528
$ 4,800
$ -
$ -
$ 3,000
$ 3,000
$ -
$ 250,000
$ 61,500
$ 322,300
$ 14,400
$ -
$ -
$ 15,000
$ 3,000
$ -
$ -
$ 64,000
$ 96,400
Stream & Plantings.
Pond
Stream Channel
Trees
Groundcover
$ 3,058,218
$ 257,500
$ 56,210
$ 148,660
$ 458,542
$ 920,912
$ -
$ 217,717
$ 58,650
$ 756,718
$ 1,033,085
$ -
$ 224,414
$ 109,980
$ 769,827
$ 1,104,221
Hardscaping.
Pavers
Concrete
Crushed Stone
Miscellaneous
$ 3,138,074
$ 1,480,151
$ 424,559
$ 58,028
$ 111,885
$ 2,074,623
$ 212,456
$ -
$ 46,856
$ 23,144
$ 282,456
$ 388,216
$ 41,351
$ 95,954
$ 255,474
$ 780,995
Sources:
[14] Stansbury,
Map of the
Great Salt Lake
and Adjacent
Country in the
Territory of
Utah (1852); and
Chamberlin,
Place and
Personal Names
of the Gosiute
Indians of Utah
(1913).
[15] Salt Lake
County, Stream
Care Guide
(2014).
[16] Seven
Canyons Trust,
Creek Channel
Alignment Data
(2018).
[17] Salt Lake
City, Anti-
Displacement
Strategy (2023).
Permitting.
There are no environmental permits needed for
the project typically of other stream restoration
projects. Expected required permits include:
Salt Lake City Building Permit;
Salt Lake City UPDES Storm Water Discharges
Permit; and
State of Utah Storm Water General Permit for
Construction Activities.
Additional permits may be needed if the project
is within Utah Department of Transportation
right-of-way beneath Interstate-15 and a noise
permit may be needed when construction begins.
Implementation.
The City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design
Plan brings us to the engineering phase. The
next steps are to build momentum and raise the
funding to construct the project. To learn more
about how you can get involved, visit the project
website: folsomtrail.org.
NEXT STEPS.
42 City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan
MAINTENANCE.
Hardscaping.
Site Structures.
Stream & Plantings.
Public Art.
Totals.354.5 Days 144 Days $ 134,500
Pavers
Concrete
Crushed Stone
Miscellaneous
26.5
26
12
25
2
4
-
18
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Bridges
Restroom
Rail Tie Benches
Tables & Chairs
Bike Racks
Skate Park
Nature Play
Area Lighting
8
12
1
1
1
12
12
2
6
8
-
4
-
4
4
8
$ 10,000
$ 20,000
$ -
$ 12,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 4,000
Pond
Stream Channel
Trees
Groundcover
32
32
39
102
24
12
8
24
$ -
$ 4,000
$ 12,000
$ 67,500
Focal Sculpture
Street Crossings
Artistic Lighting
4
6
1
4
8
6
$ 5,000
$ -
$ -
Labor Days.Contingency.Budget.
City Creek at Folsom Trail Daylighting Design Plan.
fo
l
s
o
m
t
r
a
i
l
.
o
r
g
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL DANNY WALZ
Executive Director Director
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of SALT LAKE CITY
STAFF MEMO
DATE:December 22, 2023
PREPARED BY:Marcus Lee, Project Coordinator
Ashley Ogden, Senior Project Manager
Cara Lindsley, Deputy Director
RE:Tier 1 Pre-Disposition and Lessee Selection Report for Property Assemblage
located at approximately 310 South 500 West
REQUESTED ACTION: Written Briefing
POLICY ITEM:Property Disposition
N/ABUDGET IMPACTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In accordance with the revised Real Property Disposition Policy that was adopted on March 23, 2021,
when disposing of Tier 1 properties, the RDA is required to provide an update to the Board of Directors
during the following stages of the disposition process: pre-disposition (prior to marketing the property),
developer/lessee selection, and development/lease agreement. Per the same policy, the RDA may
exclusively negotiate with a non-profit or governmental agency to dispose of property for community
development or public use. This memorandum provides a pre-disposition and lessee selection report for a
lease area that totals 1.72 acres and is located at approximately 310 South 500 West in the Depot District
Project Area.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES
The information provided in Attachment A is intended to serve as a pre-disposition and lessee selection
report for the lease of Tier 1 property located at approximately 310 South 500 West. The report provides
an update to the Board as to the property’s reuse plan, method of disposition, selected lessee, timeline of
disposition, and other information relevant to the disposition of the property.
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION
•On September 15, 2020, the RDA Board allocated $865,000 for the stabilization of the Salt Lake
Mattress Company Building.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Tier 1 Pre-Disposition and Lessee Selection Report
B. Proposed Project Renderings
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518
WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCRDA.COM
TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
Attachment A
TIER 1 PRE-DISPOSITION AND LESSEE
SELECTION REPORT
Property to be leased located at approximately 310 South 500 West
The following information serves as a pre-disposition and lessee selection report for the lease of Tier 1
property located at 310 South 500 West. The report includes the property’s reuse plan, method of
disposition, selected lessee, timeline of disposition, and other information relevant to the disposition of
the property.
Property/Lease Area: 1.72-acre lease area located at approximately 310 South 500 West, to include
proposed building footprints, setback areas between buildings and adjacent right-
of-ways, and a proposed outdoor plaza area. The lease area spans multiple
parcels that will be consolidated to create a development site.
Current Status:The area contains the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company building, as well as a
warehouse, accessory structure and parking lot that was purchased from, and is
currently leased back by, the State of Utah Department of Community and
Cultural Engagement.
Project Area:Depot District
Property Type:
Tier 1 Justification:
Tier 1
The property is specifically identified in a Salt Lake City adopted master plan.
The property is fronting or adjacent to city-owned property, other than a public
street, of at least 0.5 acres in size.
Property’s Reuse Plan:
The RDA has been exclusively negotiating with USA Climbing, the national governing body of the sport
of competition climbing, for the opportunity to develop their permanent headquarters and national
training facility on RDA-owned property at approximately 310 South 500 West, which is within the
bounds of the Station Center redevelopment project. A separate agenda item and staff memo includes a
draft term sheet that is being presented for the Board’s consideration. The proposed project is anticipated
to include three primary components:
1. New construction of a primary structure that is 65-75 feet tall with a roughly 45,000 square
foot (sf) footprint (exact specifications subject to further stakeholder engagement). This structure
will include bouldering, lead, and speed climbing walls, as well as other support uses that are
typical of a climbing facility. Most areas of the facility will be accessible by the community;
some spaces will be reserved for the U.S. National Team’s exclusive use.
2. Rehabilitation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company building, anticipated to include
publicly facing and accessible food, beverage, and retail uses, as well as private spaces for USA
Climbing offices.
3. New construction of an outdoor plaza that will be utilized for USA Climbing-hosted
competitions as well as other non-USA Climbing events (will be designed to accommodate 3,500
– 5,000 spectators). Adjacent building facades will include climbing walls to be used for regular
training and competition events, with secure access controls that allow the public to view the
climbing but prevent general access from the plaza.
Design work is preliminary and if the project moves forward, USA Climbing will work with the Planning
and Building Services Divisions to achieve a design that meets applicable zoning and building code
requirements, in addition to receiving administrative design approval from the RDA.
Method of Disposition:
The RDA has exclusively negotiated with USA Climbing, a non-profit entity, proposed terms of a 99-year
ground lease. The RDA’s Real Property Disposition Policy allows for disposition via exclusive
negotiation in certain circumstances, including if the disposition is to a non-profit for a community
development or public use. The RDA proposes to lease property to USA Climbing through exclusive
negotiation because USA Climbing is a 501(c)3 and the proposed project is projected to achieve the
following community development objectives:
•
•
Will regularly attract visitors to the district during off-peak hours and activate the neighborhood
with ~6-10 large multi-day events per year.
Will be a catalytic activation to generate excitement for the Station Center project, help attract
developers/tenants, and spur adjacent private landowners to make plans for their properties.
USA Climbing will hire 50-60 new employees.•
•USA Climbing has an estimated event-related economic impact of ~$300 million over a 10-year
period.
•USA Climbing draws many national and international visitors and brings awareness to Salt Lake
City as a world-class climbing destination.
•
•
Activation of the historic Salt Lake Mattress Company Building as described above.
Equitable and inclusive programming that may include offerings such as youth programming,
workforce development opportunities, and access to the facility for community members who
may not otherwise have access to the sport of climbing, based on income or other key measures.
Terms include the option to extend the lease term for an additional 50 years at fair market value, unless
otherwise negotiated and approved. The annual lease rate is based on the fee simple, fair market value of
the lease area, with the exception of the outdoor plaza area, which is proposed to be leased at no cost. The
annual lease rate will escalate every five 5 years based on the previous 5 years’ average Consumer Price
Index (CPI). A draft term sheet has been presented to the Board for their consideration and includes a
proposed lease abatement that would reduce the lease rate according to the following schedule:
•
•
•
•
•
Years 1-6: USA Climbing will not make any lease payments during the first six years to account
for construction and stabilization.
Year 7: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 45% of the escalated annual lease
rate.
Year 8: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 50% of the escalated annual lease
rate.
Year 9: USA Climbing shall make a payment that is equal to 55% of the escalated annual lease
rate.
Years 10-99: USA Climbing shall make annual payments that are equal to 60% of the escalated
annual lease rate.
Property discounts are subject to approval by a majority vote of the Board if property is to be leased at a
discount greater than 10% of the appraised fair market value.
Lessee Selection:
If the RDA Board approves the proposed term sheet and associated budget requests, the RDA and USA
Climbing will enter into an exclusive negotiation agreement to memorialize the commitments until all
conditions are met and final ground lease and development agreements can be executed.
Estimated Timeline of Disposition:
Pending RDA Board approval of the terms and associated budget requests, the RDA estimates the
schedule of disposition of the property will be as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
RDA Board approval of term sheet/budget requests: Q1 2024
Both parties enter into exclusive negotiation agreement: Q1 2024
USA Climbing to refine project design and secure necessary City approvals: Q1 – Q3 2024
Both parties finalize/enter into ground lease and development agreements: Q3 – Q4 2024
USA Climbing breaks ground on project: Q3 – Q4 2024
Other Information Relevant to Disposition of the Property:
In late 2022, the RDA purchased multiple State-owned parcels that will make up the future USA
Climbing site. As part of that transaction, the RDA agreed to allow the State’s Department of Cultural &
Community Engagement (C&CE) to continue using the existing warehouse structure, parking lot, and
small storage shed on site, as their future permanent home is currently under construction near the State
Capitol building. A handful of C&CE employees work on site and a historic art collection is housed there.
The lease agreement indicates that this arrangement shall remain in place until 1) C&CE can move into
the new facility or 2) through the end of 2028, whichever comes first. If the RDA desires to redevelop the
property before either of the above milestones are reached, the RDA must work with C&CE to relocate
the employees and art to another site that can accommodate their needs. The RDA and C&CE leadership
will work together to identify potential locations where the art collection and office can be temporarily
located until the new C&CE facilities at the State Capitol are completed, anticipated in Fall 2026.
Attachment B – Proposed Project Renderings
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
SWORN STATEMENT SUPPORTING CLOSURE OF MEETING
I, ____________________, acted as the presiding member of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, which met on
________________________ in an electronic meeting pursuant to Salt Lake City Proclamation.
Appropriate notice was given of the Redevelopment Agency meeting as required by §52-4-202.
A quorum of the Council was present at the meeting and voted by at least a two-thirds vote, as detailed in the minutes of
the open meeting, to close a portion of the meeting to discuss the following:
§52-4-205(l)(a) discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an
individual;
§52 -4-205(1)(b) strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
§52-4-205(l)(c) strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
§52-4-205(l)(d) strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including
any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the
appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from
completing the transaction on the best possible terms;
§52-4-205(l)(e) strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right
or water shares if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated
value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction
on the best possible terms; (ii) if the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale;
§52-4-205(1)(f) discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
§52-4-205(1)(g) investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A Closed Meeting may also be held for Attorney-Client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code
§78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and
Public Meetings Act.
Other, described as follows: _____________________________________________________________
The content of the closed portion of the Council meeting was restricted to a discussion of the matter(s) for which the
meeting was closed.
With regard to the closed meeting, the following was publicly announced and recorded, and entered on the minutes of the
open meeting at which the closed meeting was approved:
(a)the reason or reasons for holding the closed meeting;
(b)the location where the closed meeting will be held; and
(c)the vote of each member of the public body either for or against the motion to hold the closed meeting.
The recording and any minutes of the closed meeting will include:
(a)the date, time, and place of the meeting;
(b)the names of members Present and Absent; and
(c)the names of all others present except where such disclosure would infringe on the confidentiality
necessary to fulfill the original purpose of closing the meeting.
Pursuant to §52-4-206(6), a sworn statement is required to close a meeting under §52-4-205(1)(a) or (f), but a record by
tape recording or detailed minutes is not required; and Pursuant to §52-4-206(1), a record by tape recording and/or
detailed written minutes is required for a meeting closed under §52-4-205(1)(b),(c),(d),(e),and (g):
A record was not made.
A record was made by: : Electronic
recording
Detailed written minutes
I hereby swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
Presiding Member Date of Signature
January 9, 2024
Alejandro Puy
Alejandro Puy (Jan 10, 2024 12:02 MST)01/10/2024
RDA 1-9-24 Sworn Statement
Final Audit Report 2024-01-10
Created:2024-01-10
By:STEPHANIE ELLIOTT (stephanie.elliott@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAZEpMF7eLCVnEoNgPEgtA9bdxP3st98zX
"RDA 1-9-24 Sworn Statement" History
Document created by STEPHANIE ELLIOTT (stephanie.elliott@slcgov.com)
2024-01-10 - 6:35:48 PM GMT
Document emailed to alejandro.puy@slcgov.com for signature
2024-01-10 - 6:39:43 PM GMT
Email viewed by alejandro.puy@slcgov.com
2024-01-10 - 6:42:47 PM GMT
Signer alejandro.puy@slcgov.com entered name at signing as Alejandro Puy
2024-01-10 - 7:02:02 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Alejandro Puy (alejandro.puy@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2024-01-10 - 7:02:04 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2024-01-10 - 7:02:04 PM GMT