Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/02/2024 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL REVISED AGENDA FORMAL MEETING April 2, 2024 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings.    Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com   CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Victoria Petro, Chair District 1 Chris Wharton, Vice Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy District 2 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7   Generated: 10:13:34 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Eva Lopez Chavez will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1-B3 will be heard as one public hearing.   1. Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Department of Public Safety. If awarded, the grant will fund $9,280 for the Police Department Crime Lab 2024 Annual Accreditation Fee through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   2. Grant Application: Utah Department of Transportation Improvements to State Street Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Transportation Department to the Utah Department of Transportation. If awarded, the grant will fund improvements to State Street including the addition of a mid-block HAWK signal at 640 South and State Street.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   3. Grant Application: Assistance to Firefighters Submission Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to FEMA. If awarded, the grant will fund the purchase of 12 Automated External Defibrillators and 5 CPR Devices to replace current devices past their service life.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   4. Ordinance: Temporary Closure of 7200 West Between Interstate 80 and California Avenue The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would temporarily close a segment of 7200 West between I-80 and California Ave to mitigate unsafe conditions. State law allows temporarily closing certain streets until the unsafe conditions are mitigated or up to two years, whichever is less. Recurring illegal dumping activity on and adjacent to the road has worsened the risk of fire and caused mitigation expenses to the City.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Rezone at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties located at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South from R-1/7,000 (Single- Family Residential District) to CB (Community Business District). The proposal would allow for a wider range of land uses including multi-family, commercial, retail, and restaurants. Future development plans were not submitted by the applicant at this time. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 6. Petitioner: Tyler Morris, representing the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00385.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 16, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 6, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 20, 2024 and Tuesday, March 26, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)   E.NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County, generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. This resolution would only start the annexation process. The annexation will eventually come back to the Council for final approval, including designating the zoning of the properties annexed into the City after it has gone through the public process.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).     F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund – Parea, LLC. The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $350,000 loan for Parea, LLC at 320 East 900 South from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Parea, LLC is a new restaurant/market for Greek food from Chef Manoli Katsanevas. This loan will assist in the creation of fifteen new jobs in the next year and the retention of thirty current jobs.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).     G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Window Requirements for New Construction in The City’s Local Historic Districts The Council will set the date of Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code and amend the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay which includes properties within local historic districts and landmark sites. The proposed amendments add clarity to existing processes in terms of appropriate window materials, window location, and window installation in new construction projects. The City currently has 14 local historic districts and approximately 150 Landmark Sites. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00444    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 26, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2. Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC The Council will set the date of Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving the 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC. It will replace the existing Transportation Master Plan that was adopted in 1996. The Plan identifies five high-level goals, eight long-term policies called “key moves” and over 60 implementation actions to guide transportation decisions citywide over the coming decades.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3. Ordinance: Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would make the following amendments to City code: •Zoning Map Amendments: rezone properties to align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. •Zoning Text Amendments: establish a new zone, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 (MU-8), and rezone some properties within Ballpark Station Area to MU-8. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00169    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   4. Ordinance: MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to establish sign regulations for the Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) zoning district. The proposed amendments are intended to establish sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zoning district. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00959.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   5. Resolution: Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 to accept public comment for a resolution that would initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County, generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. This resolution would only start the annexation process. The annexation will eventually come back to the Council for final approval, including designating the zoning of the properties annexed into the City after it has gone through the public process.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   6. Ordinance: Enforcement on Work Without A Certificate of Appropriateness Zoning Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code for work done without a certificate of appropriateness. The proposal would address unlawful construction and demolition activities in the H Historic Preservation Zoning District Overlay. The proposed amendments are intended to protect historic resources, including designated local historic districts and local landmark sites. The changes are aimed at adding enforcement tools to prevent and counter potential code violations and at establishing a clear process to remedy alterations or demolition that occur without approval. The proposed changes will affect Chapter 21A.34.020 and related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023- 00336.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   7. Board Appointment: Housing Authority of Salt Lake – Fraser Nelson The Council will consider approving the appointment of Fraser Nelson to the Housing Authority of Salt Lake Board for a term ending April 2, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   H.ADJOURNMENT:     CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 2:00 p.m. on Monday, April 1, 2024, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. Items B1-B3 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 2, 2024 3 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/2/24 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.No.None FY2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant - Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2024 Annual Accreditation Fee If approved, the grant will pay for the Police Department’s Crime Lab 2024 accreditation fee. Needs Public Hearing Yes $9,280 Utah Department of Public Safety (pass through from U.S. DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance) Police Dept. 2.No.None.Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street - mid- block HAWK signal at 640 South and State Street If approved, the grant will provide funding for a mid-block HAWK signal at 640 South State Street. Needs Public Hearing No $155,000 Utah Department of Transporta- tion Transporta- tion Division 3.Yes. Match amount is $12,644 Source: Fire Dept. discretion- ary funds None.Assistance to Firefighters Grant for 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Device replacements If approved, the grant will fund the purchase of 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Devices for the Fire Department to replace current devices past their service life. Needs Public Hearing Yes $126,440 FEMA Fire Department The Administration has responded to the following questions from Council staff. 2.Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street - mid-block HAWK Signal at 640 South and State Street Questions: a.Does the Cooperative Agreement entered Jan. 23,2024 (listed in the memo) indicate any other improvements to State Street? The Signal Work is just one piece of a larger project. The project is being constructed on State Street from 600-800 South and includes the following elements: Midblock bus bulbouts A new signalized crosswalk between 600-700 South ( this is the signal that UDOT is paying for) Other safety improvements for people walking and taking transit. b. What is the name of the Grant Program? This was not a grant the City applied for and received. In this case, UDOT is offering to give the City money to complete the signal work for the project. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Jennifer Bruno, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Rachel Otto, Jill Love, Mary Beth Thompson, Cindy Lou Trishman CC: Sarah Behrens, Mike Brown, Shellie Dietrich, Jaysen Oldroyd, Recorder Routing; Sylvia Richards, DeeDee Robinson, Linda Sanchez, Taylor Hill, Lehua Weaver, Amy Dorsey, Shellie Dietrich, Aaron Price, David Pond FROM: Laura Nygaard DATE: March 11, 2024 SUBJECT: FY2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant FUNDING AGENCY: Utah Department of Public Safety (pass through from U.S. DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance) GRANT PROGRAM: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program REQUESTED AMOUNT: $9,280 DEPARTMENT APPLYING: Police Department COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A SPECIFICS:  Equipment/Supplies  Technical Assistance (Training)  Provides FTE Position  Existing  New  Overtime  Requires Funding After Grant Explanation:  Match Required:  In-Kind and/or  Cash  Other – See grant details below GRANT DETAILS: The Salt Lake City Police Department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Forensic Services (UBFS) application for the FY2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The state’s application includes $9,280 for the Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2024 Annual Accreditation Fee through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. Items B1-B3 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 2, 2024 3 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/2/24 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.No.None FY2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant - Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2024 Annual Accreditation Fee If approved, the grant will pay for the Police Department’s Crime Lab 2024 accreditation fee. Needs Public Hearing Yes $9,280 Utah Department of Public Safety (pass through from U.S. DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance) Police Dept. 2.No.None.Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street - mid- block HAWK signal at 640 South and State Street If approved, the grant will provide funding for a mid-block HAWK signal at 640 South State Street. Needs Public Hearing No $155,000 Utah Department of Transporta- tion Transporta- tion Division 3.Yes. Match amount is $12,644 Source: Fire Dept. discretion- ary funds None.Assistance to Firefighters Grant for 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Device replacements If approved, the grant will fund the purchase of 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Devices for the Fire Department to replace current devices past their service life. Needs Public Hearing Yes $126,440 FEMA Fire Department The Administration has responded to the following questions from Council staff. 2.Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street - mid-block HAWK Signal at 640 South and State Street Questions: a.Does the Cooperative Agreement entered Jan. 23,2024 (listed in the memo) indicate any other improvements to State Street? The Signal Work is just one piece of a larger project. The project is being constructed on State Street from 600-800 South and includes the following elements: Midblock bus bulbouts A new signalized crosswalk between 600-700 South ( this is the signal that UDOT is paying for) Other safety improvements for people walking and taking transit. b. What is the name of the Grant Program? This was not a grant the City applied for and received. In this case, UDOT is offering to give the City money to complete the signal work for the project. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO:Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Adrienne Buhler, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier, Sarah Behrens Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com Katherine Lewis FROM:Amy Dorsey DATE:April 3, 2024 SUBJECT: Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street FUNDING AGENCIES:Utah Department of Transportation GRANT PROGRAM: REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT:$155,000 DEPARTMENT: Transportation COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED:Cooperative Agreement entered Jan. 23,2024 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance No staff Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Match Required: no match required GRANT DETAILS: The City is planning to make improvements to State Street including the addition of a mid block HAWK signal at 640 South and State Street to accommodate current and future traffic needs. UDOT will contribute funds to this project. Items B1-B3 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: Public Hearing: April 2, 2024 3 NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COUNCIL REVIEW 4/2/24 City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.No.None FY2023 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant - Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2024 Annual Accreditation Fee If approved, the grant will pay for the Police Department’s Crime Lab 2024 accreditation fee. Needs Public Hearing Yes $9,280 Utah Department of Public Safety (pass through from U.S. DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance) Police Dept. 2.No.None.Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street - mid- block HAWK signal at 640 South and State Street If approved, the grant will provide funding for a mid-block HAWK signal at 640 South State Street. Needs Public Hearing No $155,000 Utah Department of Transporta- tion Transporta- tion Division 3.Yes. Match amount is $12,644 Source: Fire Dept. discretion- ary funds None.Assistance to Firefighters Grant for 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Device replacements If approved, the grant will fund the purchase of 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Devices for the Fire Department to replace current devices past their service life. Needs Public Hearing Yes $126,440 FEMA Fire Department The Administration has responded to the following questions from Council staff. 2.Utah Department of Transportation improvements to State Street - mid-block HAWK Signal at 640 South and State Street Questions: a.Does the Cooperative Agreement entered Jan. 23,2024 (listed in the memo) indicate any other improvements to State Street? The Signal Work is just one piece of a larger project. The project is being constructed on State Street from 600-800 South and includes the following elements: Midblock bus bulbouts A new signalized crosswalk between 600-700 South ( this is the signal that UDOT is paying for) Other safety improvements for people walking and taking transit. b. What is the name of the Grant Program? This was not a grant the City applied for and received. In this case, UDOT is offering to give the City money to complete the signal work for the project. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez, Lehua Weaver; Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto; Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com; Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Amy Dorsey, Adrienne Buhler; Fire Department | Karl Lieb CC: Clint Rasmussen, Brittany Blair FROM: Adrienne Buhler DATE: March 12, 2024 SUBJECT: Assistance to Firefighters Grant (23) Submission FEMA FUNDING AGENCY: FEMA FEDERAL PROGRAM: Assistance to Firefighters Grant REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $126,440.91 DEPARTMENT: Fire COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: March 7, 2024 SPECIFICS:  Equipment/Supplies  Technical Assistance  Provides FTE Existing □ New  Overtime □ Requires Funding After Grant Explanation:  Match Required $12,644.09 □ In-Kind and  Cash GRANT DETAILS: The Fire Department has applied to receive funds to support the purchase of 12 AEDs and 5 CPR Devices to replace current devices past their service life. All devices will be placed on frontline apparatus. Match funds will be cash from SLCFD discretionary funds. Item B4 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst DATE: April 2, 2024 RE: Ordinance: Temporary Closure of 7200 West between Interstate 80 and California Ave MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. MOTION 3 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING & ADOPT I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance temporarily closing a portion of 7200 West between Interstate 80 and California Ave. Staff note: The closure would go into effect upon the ordinance being published and last for up to two years or until 30 days after the safety issues are mitigated, whichever comes first. MOTION 4 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff TO: Salt Lake City Council Victoria Petro, Chair Date Received: Date Sent to Council: FROM: Jorge Chamorro, Public Services Director SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance to Close a Portion of7200 West STAFF CONTACTS: Jon Larsen, Transportation Jorge Chamorro, Public Services Department Director DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Consider and adopt the attached ordinance BUDGET IMPACT: None OFFICE OF THE MAYOR March 12, 2024 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The City Council is being asked to adopt an ordinance closing a portion of 7200 West between California Ave and I-80 (see exhibit A) on, or soon after, March 15, 2024 and until March 14, 2026. In response to the increased fire danger on public and private property posed by the recurring illegal dumping activity and the costly mitigation incurred by City Departments. The ordinance states that closure will take effect upon its adoption. This portion of 7200 West runs between California Avenue, on the South end, and after the UP railroad crossing, on the North end. The road is unimproved, meaning no asphalt, concrete or curb and gutter. The area experiences frequent illegal dumping of bulky, hazardous, and large amounts of waste due to the remote location and proximity to permitted solid waste management facilities. Responding to multiple complaints received over the last year, this location has been cleared of illegally dumped waste twice in the last year, with several City Divisions and Departments involved in these efforts. The first cleanup occurred during the week of February 20'\ 2023, resulting in the removal of: 3.6 tons of tires, 15 mattresses and over 250 tons of waste, with a total cost for labor and dumping fees of $30,000. The most recent cleanup took place in the first week of December P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMA YOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 3/12/2024 3/12/2024 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 2023, when a contractor performed the work at cost to the City of $35,000. Despite that effort, waste has slowly started accumulating again. This road has been previously closed under the direction of Salt Lake City Fire Department due to hazardous conditions caused by standing ice and water. The Fire and Police Departments are supportive of this proposal. To further deter illegal dumping, potential hazards, and reduce impact of costly cleanups, the Administration is proposing to close the 7200 West between California Ave and I-80 (see exhibit A). Utah Code 72-5-105 requires that any closure may not impair the rights-of-way or easements of any property owner and the franchise rights of any public utility, and that all property owners must still have reasonable access to their property. The closure will consist of a physical barrier, swing arm gate, installed at each closure point. Keys will be provided to adjacent property owners and a Knox Box will be installed for Fire Department’s access. Union Pacific, owner of the railroad tracks within the proposed temporary closure, will retain access to their property and has provided a letter of support (see attachment 2). Rio Tinto (Kennecott), owner of multiple parcels within the proposed temporary closure, will retain access to their property and has provided a letter of support for this closure (see attachment 3). Waste Management, owner of the Mountain View Landfill with an access gate within the proposed closure has also provided a letter of support (see attachment 4). No other property owners would be impacted by this temporary closure. PUBLIC PROCESS: This temporary closure is not subject to the early notification process as per the exemption included in City Code 2.60.050C3. EXHIBITS: A. Legal Description and Map of 7200 West Closure Between California Ave (1400 S) and I-80 B. Letters of Support from Union Pacific, Rio Tinto (Kennecott) and Waste Management C. Ordinance adopting the temporary closure. 17200 WEST POWER LINE - CALIFORNIA AVE ENGINEERING DIVISION SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PUBLIC SERVICES SURVEY DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION ”” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” EXHIBIT "A" Rio Tinto Kennecott, 4700 Daybreak Parkway, South Jordan, Utah 84009 Rio Tinto Kennecott 4700 Daybreak Parkway South Jordan, Utah 84009 Tel: (801) 204-2000 Sent via Email 09 February 2024 Public Services Department Salt Lake City Corporation 451 South State Street, Room 135 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 RE: Temporary Closure of a Section of 7200 West To Whom It May Concern: As a representative of Kennecott Utah Copper LLC (Kennecott), owner of the parcels on both sides of the proposed road closure, I express support for the temporary road closure at 7200 West between California Ave (1400 S) and I-80 with the understanding that Kennecott will have gate access. Kennecott supports this project as a practical solution to reduce illegal dumping, encampments, and other illicit activites along the corridor. The impacts of which have spilled over onto Kennecott property. These activities are a cause for environmental and safety concerns for Kennecott’s employees, contractors, and tenants. Kennecott will remain in communication with the City project contacts during this temporary closure and will share any additional concerns if they arise. If you have questions about this letter of support, you can contact me via email at colton.norman@riotinto.com or by phone at (385) 253-0910. Sincerely, Colton Norman Principal Advisor – Land Managment Rio Tinto Kennecott UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 650 Davis Rd Salt Lake City, UT 84119 Nathan Anderson Senior Director, Public Affairs Corporate Relations P 801-212-5415 F 402-501-2301 E nanderson@up.com March 7, 2024 RE: Temporary Closure of a section of 7200 W To Whom it May Concern: Union Pacific Railroad, owner of the rail line that is crossed by 7200West in Salt Lake City, supports the proposed road closure between California Ave (1400 S) and I-80, as long as access by railroad personnel and equipment remains open. We have been assured that gates installed will be made accessible to appropriate Union Pacific personnel. We support this project for general safety and rail efficiency reasons. Illegal dumping and potential for trespassing/encampments put our employees at risk and prevent safe access to our property. This can create delays in getting crews to and from trains which impacts safe and efficient train movement and can have ramifications to the motoring public by unnecessarily blocking crossings in the area I will remain in communication with the City’s project contacts during this temporary closure and will share with them any additional concerns if they arise. If you have questions about this letter of support, you can contact me directly. Sincerely, Nathan Anderson Senior Director, Public Affairs 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2024 (Temporarily closing a portion of 7200 West Street between California Avenue and the Southerly Boundary of Tax Parcel 14-03-300-001-0000) An ordinance temporarily closing a portion of 7200 West Street between California Avenue and the Southerly Boundary of Tax Parcel 14-03-300-001-0000, pursuant to Utah Code Section 72-5-105. WHEREAS, areas along 7200 West Street north of California Avenue and adjacent to the Union Pacific rail line that is located approximately 3/4ths of a mile north of California Avenue have been used for dangerous criminal activity, including illegally dumping debris, including hazardous materials; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(3) allows a municipality to temporarily close a class C road to mitigate unsafe conditions after following the procedures specified under Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(5), which requires the city to hold a public hearing on the temporary closure and provide notice to the Utah Department of Transportation and the adjacent landowners of the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the city has complied with the procedures set forth in Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(5); and WHEREAS, the city has partnered with Salt Lake County as part of a coordinated clean up effort, which includes mitigating the unsafe conditions adjacent to the portion of 7200 West Street described herein; and WHEREAS, the abutting property owners are supportive of this temporary closure and the efforts to clean up areas adjacent to 7200 West Street; and 2 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that there is good cause for the temporary closure of the portion of 7200 West Street described herein to mitigate the unsafe conditions caused by illegal dumping of hazardous materials and other debris; NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Temporarily Closing a City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of 7200 West Street situated between California Avenue and the Southerly Boundary of Tax Parcel 14- 03-300-001-0000, and which is more particularly shown and described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is hereby temporarily closed as a public right-of-way pursuant to Utah Code Section 72- 5-105 for the period described in Section 2 below and is declared not presently necessary or available for use as a public right-of-way during that period. SECTION 2. Temporary Closure Period; Reopening. In accordance with the planned coordinated clean-up and criminal detection and prevention activities, the portion of 7200 West Street described herein shall be closed as a public right-of-way from the effective date of this ordinance until two years thereafter or thirty (30) days after mitigation of the unsafe conditions is completed, whichever occurs first. Upon the conclusion of the temporary closure period, the mayor shall direct that the portion of 7200 West Street described in Exhibit "A" hereto shall be reopened and all obstructions to vehicular traffic removed. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its publication. 3 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024 Published: ______________. Ordinance temporarily closing a portion of 7200 W_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney March 11, 2024 Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South PLNPCM2023-00385 MOTION 1 (adopt) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 8, 2023 Darin Mano, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: 1300 South Commercial Rezone Petition PLNPCM2023-00385 STAFF CONTACT: Eric Daems, Senior Planner 801-535-7236 or eric.daems@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council amend the zoning map as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Tyler Morris, the applicant representing the property owner, submitted a petition for a Zoning Map Amendment for the properties located at 2260, 2270, and 2290 E. 1300 South. The properties are currently zoned R-1-7000, which is a single-family residential zone. The petition is to rezone the properties to CB- Community Business. The CB zone allows for a wider range of land uses including multi-family, commercial, retail, and restaurants. The request did not require a master plan amendment. At this point, the applicant has not provided a development plan for the properties. However, it is anticipated they would be developed in junction with adjoining properties to the south and would be used for multi-family housing or a mixed-use development. AS rachel o//o (Nov 20, 2023 11:0у MST)11ҝ20ҝ2023 11ҝ20ҝ2023 The subject properties front along 1300 South, between Foothill Drive and 2300 East. 1300 South is a collector street where 2300 East is a local street and Foothill Drive is a State arterial street. The property currently contains three single-family homes. Each of the dwellings are currently used as housing rentals. Within proximity of the subject property, there is a mix of single-family and commercial uses. The neighborhood to the north (across 1300 South) contains single-family homes and is zoned R-1-12,000. The properties to the south and west include a single- story gas station, 2-story restaurant/office, and 3-story hotel. The commercial properties are zoned CB. The property to the east (across 2300 East) is a cemetery and is zoned OS (Open Space). The Planning Commission reviewed the request at a public hearing September 13, 2023. The Commission had some questions about final development of the property but voted (7-2) in favor of the City Council amending the zoning map as requested. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification- Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and tenants located within 300 feet of the subject parcels on July 3, 2023. • East Bench Community Council- Notification to the East Bench Community Council was sent on July 3, 2023. The community council did not request the applicant attend a community open house but did present a letter of opposition which is in the Planning Commission Staff Report. • City Open House- A virtual open house was hosted by the city from July 3, 2023 - August 17, 2023. • Planning Commission Public Hearing- On September 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted to recommend the City Council approve the rezone. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of September 13, 2023 b) PC Minutes of September 13, 2023 c) Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBITS: 1) Project Chronology 2) Notice of City Council Hearing 3) Original Petition 4) Mailing List 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 202__ (An ordinance amending the zoning of properties located at 2260 East 1300 South, 2270 East 1300 South, and 2290 East 1300 South from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District to CB Community Business District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 2260 East 1300 South, 2270 East 1300 South, and 2290 East 1300 South from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District to CB Community Business District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023- 00385. WHEREAS, Tyler Morris (“Petitioner”) submitted an application to rezone the parcels located at 2260 East 1300 South, 2270 East 1300 South, and 2290 East 1300 South (Tax ID. Nos. 16-10-379-004-0000, 16-10-379-005-0000, and 16-10-379-006-0000) (collectively, the “Property”) from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District to CB Community Business District; and WHEREAS, at its September 13, 2023 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on the application; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the city council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property, as legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District to CB Community Business District. 2 SECTION 2. Condition. The zoning map amendment set forth herein is conditioned upon the owner of the Property entering into a development agreement with Salt Lake City to retain three dwelling units on the Property. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the condition set forth in Section 2 is satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. SECTION 4. Time. If the condition set forth in Section 2 has not been met within one year after adoption of this ordinance, then this ordinance shall become null and void. The city council may, for good cause shown, extend the time period for satisfying the above condition by resolution. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ____________, 20__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 20__ Published: ______________. Ordinance rezoning 2260 E. 1300 S., 2270 E. 1300 S., and 2290 E. 1300 S. to CB APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney November 16, 2023 3 Exhibit “A” Legal description of the Property Tax ID No. 16-10-379-004-0000 326 COM N 89º53'42" W 156.5 FT FR NE COR LOT 12 BLK 15 5 AC PLAT C BIG FIELD SUR N 89º53'42" W 91.5 FT S 0º02'52" E 110 FT S 89º53'42" E 91.5 FT N 0º02'52" W 110 FT TO BEG 0.23 AC 5445-1625 5853-2576 Tax ID No. 16-10-379-005-0000 326 COM N 89º53'42" W 88 FT FR NE COR LOT 12 BLK 15 5 AC PLAT C BIG FIELD SUR N 89º53'42" W 68.5 FT S 0º02'52" E 110 FT S 89º53'42" E 68.5 FT N 0º02'52" W 110 FT TO BEG 0.17 AC 5595-1401 5681-1152 5686-282 Tax ID No. 16-10-379-006-0000 326 COM AT NE COR LOT 12 BLK 15 5 AC PLAT C BIG FIELD SUR N 89º53'42" W 88 FT S 0º02'52" E 114 FT S 89º53'42" E 96 FT N 0º02'52" W 114 FT W 8 FT TO BEG 938-41, 1197- 97 6110-2590 6116-1628 6119-0622 6129-740 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Project Chronology 1300 South Commercial Zoning Map Amendment Petition PLNPCM2023-00385 May 19, 2023 Petition received by the City June 15, 2023 Petition assigned to Eric Daems. July 3, 2023 Notice sent to East Bench Community Council. July 3, 2023 Early notification sent to property owners and tenants within 300’ of subject properties. July 3 – August 17, 2023 Virtual open house hosted on the City’s website. September 4, 2023 Notice signs posted on properties indicating date of Public Hearing. September 7, 2023 Notice of the Planning Commission Public Hearing posted and mailed to property owners and tenants within 300’ of subject properties. September 7, 2023 Notice of Public Hearing emailed to listserv accounts. September 13, 2023 Planning Commission Public Hearing held. Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the proposal. November 8, 2023 Transmittal Submitted to CAN 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00385– A request by Tyler Morris, representing the property owner, for a Zoning Map Amendment for the properties located at 2260, 2270, and 2290 E. 1300 South. 1. Zoning Map Amendment: To rezone the subject properties from R-1-7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business). The CB zone allows for a wider range of land uses including multi-family, commercial, retail, and restaurants. However, a specific development proposal has not been provided at this point. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Eric Daems at 801-535-7236 or via e-mail at eric.daems@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00385. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION Zoning Amendment  Amend the text of the Zoning Ordinance  Amend the Zoning Map OFFICE USE ONLY Received By: Date Received: Project #: Name or Section/s of Zoning Amendment: PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION Address of Subject Property (or Area): Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Cell/Fax: Applicant’s Interest in Subject Property:  Owner  Contractor  Architect  Other: Name of Property Owner (if different from applicant): Phone: formation may be required by the project planner to ensure adequate information is provided for staff analysis. All information required for staff analysis will be copied and made public, including professional architectural or engineering drawings, for the purposes of public review by any interested party. AVAILABLE CONSULTATION If you have any questions regarding the requirements of this application, please contact Salt Lake City Planning Counter at zoning@slcgov.com prior to submitting the application. REQUIRED FEE Map Amendment: $1,142 filing fee, plus $121 per acre (excess of one acre), plus additional public notice fee. Text Amendment: $1,142 filing fee, plus additional public notice fee. Public noticing fees will be assessed after the application is submitted. SIGNATURE If applicable, a notarized statement of consent authorizing applicant to act as an agent will be required. Signature of Owner or Agent: Date: SA L T L A K E C I T Y P L A N N I N G UPDATED 6/28/22 4 (2260 E, 2270 E. & 2290 E.) 1300 S. 4 TJDD Properties, LLC 05/11/2023 Updated 9/14/22 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided by Salt Lake City for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. AFFIRMATION OF SUFFICIENT INTEREST I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. The following shall be provided if the name of the applicant is different than the name of the property owner: 1.If you are not the fee owner attach a copy of your authorization to pursue this action provided by the fee owner. 2.If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 3.If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership 4.If a Home Owner’s Association is the applicant than the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. Be advised that knowingly making a false, written statement to a government entity is a crime under Utah Code Chapter 76-8, Part 5. Salt Lake City will refer for prosecution any knowingly false representations made pertaining to the applicant’s interest in the property that i s the subject of this application. APPLICANT SIGNATURE Name of Applicant: Application Type: Signature: Date: FEE TITLE OWNER SIGNATURE Legal Description of Subject Property: Name of Owner: Signature: Date: Tyler Morris Zoning Amendment TJDD Properties, LLC 05/11/2023 COM N 89^53'42" W 156.5 FT FR NE COR LOT 12 BLK 15 5 AC PLATC BIG FIELD SUR N 89^53'42" W 91.5 FT S 0^02'52" E 110 FT S 89^53'42" E 91.5 FT N 0^02'52" W 110 FT TO BEG 0.23 AC 5445-1625 5853-2576 05/11/2023 St a f f R e v i e w SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 1.Project Description (please electronically attach additional sheets. See Section 21A.50 for the Amendments ordinance.) A statement declaring the purpose for the amendment. A description of the proposed use of the property being rezoned. List the reasons why the present zoning may not be appropriate for the area. Is the request amending the Zoning Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed. WHERE TO FILE THE COMPLETE APPLICATION Apply online through the Citizen Access Portal. There is a step-by-step guide to learn how to submit online. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED ______ I acknowledge that Salt Lake City requires the items above to be submitted before my application can be processed. I understand that Planning will not accept my application unless all of the following items are included in the submittal package. UPDATED 6/28/22 4 4 4 4 4 4. MAILING LIST NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP DEE'S FOOTHILL INVESTMENTS LLC 1136 E WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 HUNSAKER, LILLIAN S; TR 1233 S FOOTHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 Current Occupant 1304 S FOOTHILL DR Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 1309 S FOOTHILL DR Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 1310 S 2300 E Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 1313 S FOOTHILL DR Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 1345 S FOOTHILL DR Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 1400 S FOOTHILL DR Salt Lake City UT 84108 AP FOOTHILL VILLAGE, LLC 1616 CAMDEN RD #210 CHARLOTTE NC 28203 JONES, DONALD J & KRISTY W(JT) 2223 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 LEISHMAN, MERLIN R &LARRY R; TRS 2235 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 Current Occupant 2236 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2241 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2244 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2249 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2252 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2253 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2259 E LAIRD WAY Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2260 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84108 Current Occupant 2270 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84108 GOCHNOUR, RALPH L. & ROSETTA S 2289 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 Current Occupant 2290 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84108 LAMPROPOULOS, FRED 2315 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 LAURA G GAYLORD LIV TRGAYLORD, LAU 2321 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 Current Occupant 2350 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84108 LARKIN MEMORIAL CORPORATION 260 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 TJDD PROPERTIES, LLC 348 E 6400 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 RELIANCE BUILDING COMPANY 3591 E COVEPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 TJDD PROPERTIES, LLC 4222 S WANDER LN HOLLADAY UT 84124 FOREST CORPORATION 5330 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117 GROW, JODY W; JTGROW, RICHARD F; JT 623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DOANE, KERRY S; TR(KSD TRUST) PO BOX 581486 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 Signature: Email: Alejandro Sanchez (Nov 20, 2023 10:16 MST) alejandro.sanchez@slcgov.com CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at 2260, 2270, and 2290 East 1300 South PLNPCM2023-00385 PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE One person spoke at the March 26, 2024 continued public hearing requesting that any potential new development on the site be ADA compliant. The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future meeting. No one spoke at the February 20, 2024 public hearing. Because the petitioner planned to provide additional information, the Council continued the hearing to a future meeting. The petitioner followed up indicating that if the zoning map amendment was approved by the Council, it is likely some portion of new dwelling units would meet the 80% area median income (AMI) threshold, but they are not open to committing to any requirement through a development agreement. If the rezone is not approved, a smaller development could be built on the parking lot area of the property under existing zoning and would be less likely to include dwelling units at the 80% AMI threshold. It is anticipated that a new tenant will occupy the currently vacant restaurant space fronting Foothill Drive, which will serve as the mixed-use portion of a new development. It is the petitioner’s belief that limited exposure and foot traffic from 2300 East would make it difficult for retail businesses in other areas of the site to succeed. The following information was provided for previous Council meetings. It is included again for background purposes. Item Schedule: Briefing: January 16, 2024 Set Date: February 6, 2024 Public Hearing: February 20, March 26, 2024 Potential Action: April 2, 2024 Page | 2 BRIEFING UPDATE Much of the January 16, 2024 briefing was focused on potential affordable housing in the proposed development. Council Members expressed a desire for affordable units either with, or separate from, the Affordable Housing Initiative. The petitioner said they hadn’t planned on including affordable units but will review possibilities to include them. Planning staff will work with the petitioner to let them know what options exist for affordable units. When asked about maintaining current zoning on the subject parcels and constructing fourplexes, the petitioner said it wouldn’t be financially feasible, and the existing homes would likely stay. Without these parcels, there is not enough space to do a development in the current parking lot. They are amenable to exploring available tools and include them as options for future development. The petitioner will discuss with the property owner and follow up once they have more information. The petitioner clarified that the subject parcels, vacant restaurant, and parking lot are under common ownership. There are plans for a new tenant to move into the restaurant space. The proposed building would utilize most of the parking lot and include 50-60 units, providing an additional housing option in an area of predominantly single-family homes. The existing gas station/fast food restaurant, and hotel are under separate ownership and not included in this proposal. The petitioner will provide more information to the Council after discussions with the property owner. The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for parcels at 2260 East, 2270 East, and 2290 East 1300 South in City Council District Six from their current R-1/7,000 (Single-family Residential) zoning designation to CB (Community Business). The petitioner has not submitted development plans for the parcels, but it is anticipated they would be developed along with adjoining property to the south for multi-family housing or a mixed-use development. The parcels are between Foothill Drive and 2300 East, as shown in the image below, and each has a single-family dwelling currently used as rental housing. Adjacent properties to the south and west are zoned CB and include a parking lot, gas station/fast food restaurant, a two-story restaurant and office building (the restaurant is currently vacant), and a three-story hotel. Properties on the north side of 1300 South are zoned R-1/12,000 and include single-family homes. A cemetery zoned OS (Open Space) is on the east side of 2300 East. The Foothill Village shopping center is on the west side of Foothill Drive and is zoned CS (Community Shopping). The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning map amendment during its September 13, 2023 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted 7-2 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. One Commissioner who voted in opposition cited concerns with what could be built on the site under the proposed zoning, and a potential loss of residential feel. She prefers moderate-density residential zoning for the parcels. The other Commissioner who voted against the motion did not state why he was opposed. Planning staff received a letter from the East Bench Community Council outlining their opposition to the proposed zoning map amendment. It is included on pages 21-24 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized here. Concerns include changes to the neighborhood and encroachment, and the proposed zoning does not follow some initiatives found in the East Bench Master Plan. In addition, Planning received email comments expressing concern with neighborhood impacts including parking, traffic, and reduced walkability. Page | 3 Area zoning map with the subject properties outlined in yellow. Aerial view looking south with the subject properties outlined in yellow. Images courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to ask the applicant if they plan to include any affordable housing in potential future projects on the subject sites. If yes, is the Council interested in asking the applicant Page | 4 if they would be willing to enter into a development agreement pertaining to affordable housing units? 2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration how the Affordable Housing Incentives may impact this petition or development potential on the property. 3. The Council may wish to ask if tenants of the properties will be offered relocation assistance. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 4-8 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – Master Plan Compatibility. Planning staff found that the proposed zoning map amendment supports several initiatives in Plan Salt Lake, East Bench Master Plan, and the Salt Lake City Housing Plan. It has the potential to increase moderate-density housing in a neighborhood with existing infrastructure. Combining the parcels with adjacent parcels already zoned CB would allow cohesive development for the block and vehicular access from a key intersection on Foothill Drive. Consideration 2 – Housing Loss Mitigation. When properties with housing units are rezoned to a zoning district that allows non-residential uses, a housing loss mitigation plan approved by the City is required. Options for mitigation are found in Chapter 18.97.030 Salt Lake City Code. They include replacement housing, a fee based on the difference between existing housing and replacement cost, and a fee where deteriorated housing exists, not caused by deliberate indifference of the landowner. In this case, the petitioner chose to enter a development agreement with the City requiring the three single-family homes to be replaced with at least the same number of dwelling units if the homes are demolished. Consideration 3 – Neighborhood Impacts. The CB zoning district is intended to provide close integration of moderately sized commercial areas with adjacent residential neighborhoods. As discussed above, the subject properties abut CB-zoned development to the south and west. Planning staff found that if additional development occurred on the CB zoned properties, the single-family homes would feel isolated and potentially out of place. Future buildings larger than 7,500 square feet within the CB zone would require additional design standards and design review approval from the Planning Commission. As shown in the zoning comparison table below, the 30-foot maximum building height in CB zoning is similar to the 28-foot maximum height under current R-1/7,000 zoning. Planning staff found that 1300 South will help buffer single-family residential properties to the north. ZONING COMPARISON The following table compares building height, setback, and other requirements for the current R-1/7,000 and proposed CB zoning districts. Page | 5 R-1/7,000 (Current)CB (Proposed) Maximum Building Height 28 feet for pitched roofs or average of block face. 20 feet for flat roofs. 20-foot maximum exterior wall height adjacent to interior side yards. 30 feet. Setbacks Front - average of buildings on block face or 20 feet where none exist. Corner side - average of buildings on block face or 20 feet where none exist. Side - 6 feet and 10 feet. Rear - 25 feet. Front - none. Sides - none. Rear- 10 feet. A maximum setback of 15 feet is required for at least 75% of the façade. Exceptions approved only through design review. Coverage/Open Space At least 60% required.All provided yards to be landscaped. Parking Two parking spaces per dwelling unit.Minimum: Studio and 1+ bedrooms: 1 space per dwelling unit. Maximum: All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per dwelling unit. 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per dwelling unit. Lot Area/Width No minimum size or width for municipal services, open space and trails, utility lines. 12,000 square feet and 80 feet wide for places of worship less than 4 acres in size. 7,000 square feet and 50 feet wide for all other permitted uses. None Analysis of Standards Attachment E (pages 17-19) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties Complies Page | 6 Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Some City public facilities and services may need to be upgraded and improved if the density changes or if land use changes to a more intense use. City Department Review During City review of the petitions, no responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal but stated additional review and permits would be required if the property is developed. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • May 19, 2023-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • June 15, 2023-Petition assigned to Eric Daems, Senior Planner. • July 3, 2023- o Notice sent to East Bench Community Council. o Early notification sent to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject properties. • July 3-August 17, 2023-Virtual open house hosted on the City’s website. • September 4, 2023-Notice signs posted on properties indicating date of the public hearing. • September 7, 2023- o Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing posted and mailed to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject properties. o Notice of public hearing emailed to listserv accounts. • September 13, 2023- Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 7-2 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • August 22, 2023-Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office. • November 16, 2023-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • November 20, 2023-Transmittal received in City Council Office. Item E1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: MOTION SHEET – Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation MOTION 1 I move that the Council adopt a resolution expressing intent to pursue annexation of the area shown on the map in Exhibit A into Salt Lake City. MOTION 2 I move that the Council reject the Resolution. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: April 2, 2024 RE:Northpoint Area Annexation Initiation PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: Public Hearing: Potential Action: April 2, 2024 ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a resolution that would initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County, generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. This resolution would only start the annexation process. The annexation will eventually come back to the Council for final approval, including designating the zoning of properties annexed into the city, after it has gone through the public process. The State annexation process requires a public hearing on the annexation initiation to be held no sooner than 30 days after the resolution is adopted. Staff proposes the Council hold a briefing and adopt the resolution initiating the annexation process on April 2. Then hold a public hearing on May 7. During that time City staff will reach out to stakeholders and property owners about the annexation. The Northpoint Small Area plan (adopted November 2023) included policy direction pertaining to potential annexations that are considered before a new zoning district is approved, that would help implement the polices and goals of the small area plan. Page | 2 That guidance states the following: “…any unincorporated land located within the Transitional area, upon annexation into the city, will be subject to the AG-2 zoning designation until such time as the City Council adopts a new zoning district or overlay that aligns with the envisioned plan. (Page 14, Northpoint Small Area Plan) Next Steps / Timeline A city led annexation would move forward according to the following timeline: 1. Adopt a Resolution initiating the process (proposed for April 2) a. Start noticing for the public hearing 14 days after adoption 2. Hold a Public Hearing (Proposed for May 7) a. No earlier than 30 days after resolution adopted to start the process b. Must provide 3 weeks’ notice 3. The protest period is between the adoption of the Resolution and the Public Hearing. a. Protest will be received by the City Recorder’s Office b. If 50% of the total land value and 50% of the total land area of private property owners submit a protest, then the annexation area must be re-evaluated and cannot continue. 4. Adopt Ordinance annexing properties into the city 5. Within 60 days of adoption file with the Lieutenant Governor’s Office a. Notice of Impending Boundary Action b. Final Local Entity Plat c. Adopted Ordinance The zoning of properties will be designated at the time of annexation, it is not required to go through the typical zoning process. However, if the Council chooses, they have the option to request the Planning Commission make a recommendation on the zoning. This could be done before the Annexation ordinance (step 3) is adopted. Within 60 days of adoption file with the Lieutenant Governor’s Office • Notice of Impending Boundary Action • Final Local Entity Plat • Adopted Ordinance APRIL 2: Adopt Proposed Resolution APRIL 16: Public Hearing Notice (3 weeks before the Public Hearing, 14 days after the Resolution is adopted) APRIL 2 - MAY 7: Protest Period (Received at the City Recorder’s Office) May 7: Hold a Public Hearing Adopt Proposed Ordinance • North Salt Lake consents to annexation • Salt Lake County consents to annexation NEXT STEPS | CITY INTIATED ANNEX 1 2 3 4 5 6 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 03/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Northpoint Area Annexation STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director at nick.norris@slcgov.com or 801-535-6173 DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution initiating the process to annex lands into the city as indicated in the attached Resolution. BUDGET IMPACT: None, however annexing land into the city increases property tax from the annexed properties, but also increases cost to provide municipal services. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The purpose of this transmittal is to provide the City Council with a resolution to initiate the annexation process for land located in unincorporated portions of Salt Lake County. The land in question is generally located along 2200 West and within the area identified as the Northpoint community. The city has the authority to annex land without a petition from property owners, under Utah Code Section 10-2-418. The Council is only being asked to initiate the process. If the annexation is initiated and ultimately approved as proposed, it would eliminate all islands and peninsulas in the general area. PUBLIC PROCESS: An annexation without a petition authorized under Utah Code requires the City Council to hold a public hearing no earlier than 30 days after adopting the attached resolution, which indicates the council’s intent to annex the area described in Exhibit B. The City rachel otto (Mar 24, 2024 12:42 MDT)03/24/2024 03/24/2024 Council must give three weeks prior notice of the public hearing, which the City Recorder’s Office will assist with. The City council may adopt an ordinance approving the annexation upon conclusion of the public hearing. Utah code section 10-2-418 requires that North Salt Lake provide consent to the annexation because several years ago they amended their annexation policy to include some of the same land that is subject to this annexation proposal. EXHIBITS: 1) Resolution 2) Annexation maps and additional information Exhibit A Resolution RESOLUTION NO. ________ OF 2024 RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED PROPERTIES NORTH-NORTHEAST OF THE SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AND NEAR THE SALT LAKE COUNTY BORDER WITH DAVIS COUNTY PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE SECTION 10-2-418 WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-2-418 allows a municipality to annex unincorporated areas without an annexation petition under certain circumstances; and WHEREAS, some owners of real property north of 2100 North Street and adjacent to 2200 West Street in unincorporated Salt Lake County near the Salt Lake County-Davis County border (the “Properties”) have expressed interest in annexing their land into Salt Lake City’s corporate limits; and WHEREAS, collectively, the Properties are contiguous to the corporate limits of Salt Lake City and are identified within an expansion area described as “Study Area 1 - West Airport” in the city’s annexation policy plan titled, “A MASTER ANNEXATION POLICY DECLARATION for Salt Lake City, Utah” adopted in 1979 and as shown on the map accompanying that plan titled, “SALT LAKE CITY Annexation Policy Declaration Proposed Future Boundaries”; and WHEREAS, a majority of the area consists of residential or commercial development with fewer than 800 residents; and WHEREAS, in addition to the privately-owned land in the proposed annexation area, over 200 acres of the Properties are owned by Salt Lake City Corporation, the majority of which was acquired through federal grants for such land to be used for airport purposes; and WHEREAS, the Properties constitute an unincorporated peninsula, as that term is defined in Utah Code Section 10-2-401; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake County Council approved an annexation near Rose Park Lane with the contingency that Salt Lake City make efforts to annex all of the unincorporated areas to the west and north of the Property; and WHEREAS, most of the area in the proposed annexation has received some Salt Lake City municipal-type services for many years and continue to receive those utility services; and WHEREAS, as part of an effort by private property owners to annex a portion of the Properties into North Salt Lake City in recent years, North Salt Lake City amended its annexation policy plan in 2021 to include some of the proposed annexation areas into that city’s proposed expansion area; and WHEREAS, some owners who sponsored the effort to annex into North Salt Lake City are now supportive of annexing into Salt Lake City’s corporate boundaries; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Subsection 10-2-418(2) requires that unincorporated areas that are within the expansion areas of more than one municipality must receive the consent of all other municipalities whose annexation policy plans include the subject area in their respective expansion areas in order to annex the area; and WHEREAS, in pursuing its intent to annex the Properties, Salt Lake City acknowledges that it must receive the consent of North Salt Lake City before annexation of the Properties can be completed; and WHEREAS, because the Properties are within Salt Lake City’s expansion area in its 1979 annexation policy plan and because the Properties are collectively congruous to Salt Lake City corporate limits, the Salt Lake City Council finds that adopting this resolution of intent to annex the Properties identified in Exhibit A hereto is in the city’s and private property owners’ best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: That Salt Lake City intends to pursue annexation of the area shown on the map in Exhibit “A” into Salt Lake City pursuant to Utah Code Section 10-2-418. DATED this ______ day of ________________, 2024. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of ________________, 2024. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By:___________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Resolution intent to annex properties per 10-2-418 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney March 18, 2024 EXHIBIT “A” (map of proposed area to be annexed) Exhibit B: Annexation Maps and Additional Information N32 00 W N 3 200 W Rudy Duck Clb Reclamation Ditch N 2450 W W 2100 N S e w a g e C a n a l N 3200 W W 3300 N N 32 00 W Rudy Duck Clb N 32 00 W Re cla m a tion D itc h N 3 20 0 W Reclamation Ditch W 2100 N J o r d an R i v e r Sewage C anal S e w a g e C a n a l J or d a n River N 2 200 W N 2 200 W W 3300 N N 22 00 W W 2670 N W 2670 N R e c l a mat i o n D i tc h N 22 00 W W 2100 N Fo xboro Dr Walton Dr Kent Dr Legacy P k wy N Jo rd an River J o r d a n R i v e r W Center St W Center St Fo x b o ro Dr River B e n d W a y Walton Dr S 1200 W Jo rd a n R i v er Dr Lega cy P k wy N S e w a g e C a n al J o r d a n R i v e r Jordan R i v er 215 215 S 1 2 0 0 W Lega cyPkwy N 27 Re c la ma ti on Ditch Rose P ar k L n W 2670 N Lega cy P kw yN 27 Jor dan R i v er Rose Par kLn 2350 N 25 J o r d a n Riv e r Rose ParkLn W 2100 N N2180 W F o x Ho l l ow Dr S t a mford Dr M a n c hest e r D r O l d h a m D r Somersby Win d s o r D r W Center St Farnham Dr Chatham DrN Bos ton Ln Caleb Dr Amazon DUT7 Salt Lake City C anal 68 S R e dwood Rd Jo r dan River S Redwood Rd N Redwood Rd Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Salt Lake, Utah Geospatial Resource Center, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Salt Lake County, Maxar, Microsoft . 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.13 Miles Proposed AnnexationSLC/SLCO/Davis County Boundary City-Initiated Annexation Hunter Stables Legend 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  10 11 12 13 15 14 16 17181 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 30 31 3233 34 35 36 37 38                N3200 W N 3200 W Rudy Duck Clb Reclamation Ditch N 2450 W W 2100 N S e w a g e C a n a l N 3200 W W 3300 N N 3200 W Rudy Duck Clb N 3200 W R e cla m a tio n D itc h N 3200 W Reclamation Ditch W 2100 N J o r d a n R i v e r Sewage Canal S e w a g e C a n al J or d a n River N 2 200 W N 2200 W W 3300 N N 2200 W W 2670 N W 2670 N R e c l a m a t i o n D i tc h N 2200 W W 2100 N Foxboro Dr Walton Dr Kent Dr Legacy P kwy N Jordan River J o r d a n R i v e r W Center St W Center St Foxboro Dr River B e n d W a y Walton Dr S 1200 W Jord a n R i v er Dr Legacy P kwy N S e w a g e C a n al J o r d a n R i v e r Jordan River 215 215 S 1 2 0 0 W LegacyPkwy N 27 Reclamation Ditch Rose P ar k L n W 2670 N LegacyPkwyN 27 Jordan River RoseParkLn 2350 N 25 J o r d a n Riv e r Rose ParkLn W 2100 N N2180 W F o x Hollow Dr S t amford Dr M a n c h e s t e r D r O l d h a m D r Somersby Win d s o r D r W Center St Farnham Dr Chatham DrN Boston Ln Caleb Dr Amazon DUT7 Salt LakeCityCanal 68 S R edwood Rd Jordan River S Redwood Rd N Redwood Rd Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Salt Lake, Utah Geospatial Resource Center, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS, Salt Lake County, Maxar, Microsoft . 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.13 Miles Proposed AnnexationSLC/SLCO/Davis County Boundary City-Initiated Annexation Hunter Stables Legend Item F1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget and Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO PAREA, LLC, AT 320 EAST 900 SOUTH MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council adopt the ordinance approving a $350,000 loan for Parea, LLC, from the Economic Development Loan Fund. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance, and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Allison Rowland Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:April 2, 2024 RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO PAREA, LLC, AT 320 EAST 900 SOUTH ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will consider approving a loan from the City’s Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) to a business called Parea, LLC, a restaurant and market for Greek food owned by Chef Manoli Katsanevas. The City’s Economic Development Loan Committee recommends the Council approve a $350,000 loan at an 11.50% fixed interest rate over seven years to this business in the start-up category. This loan will assist in the creation of 15 new jobs in the next year, and retention of 30 existing jobs. The loan amount is larger than most EDLP start-up loans—more than triple the standard $100,000 limit. Program rules allow this threshold to be exceeded by business owners who can demonstrate three or more years of experience in a comparable industry, and the EDLP Loan Committee agreed this was the case for Mr. Katsanevas. In addition, he owns the property where the business will be located and will provide $550,000 of his own funds to the project. The relatively high interest rate reflects the 8.5% prime rate at the time of the application plus the standard EDLF four percentage points, though the project did qualify for a 1% reduction (see section B below). Goal of the briefing: Consider a potential $350,000 loan from the Economic Development Loan Fund to a business called Parea, LLC. ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A.Interest Rates. For context, the nationwide median small business commercial and industrial loan rates for the third quarter of 2023 (the most recent data available), were 7.71% for fixed-rate loans at urban banks, and 8.98% for variable rate loans, according to the most recent U.S. Federal Reserve Small Business Lending Survey.i In the second quarter of 2022, these rates were 4.50% and 5.55% respectively. Interest Item Schedule: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Public Hearing: N/A Potential Action: April 2, 2024 Page | 2 rates for EDLF loans consider an assessment of the risk level of different applicants, among other factors. Loan interest rates have ranged from 7.25% to 11.00% since the beginning of 2022, with most at 7.25%. B.Interest Rate Reductions. The bases for potential reductions are as follows: 1.Location within a priority area: RDA Project Area; Opportunity Zone; West of I-15; or Neighborhood Business Improvement Program (NBIP, previously known as Façade Improvement) target area. 2.Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individuals (SEDI)-Owned Businesses: 51% of the business is owned by at least one SEDI individual. 3.Low Income Business Owner: Income does not exceed 80% of Salt Lake County average median income (AMI) as defined by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 4.Sustainability: Either, a. Membership in SLC Green’s E2 Business Program; or b. Loan proceeds will be used for the purchase of electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging stations and infrastructure, renewable energy including but not limited to wind and solar, heat pumps, high efficiency equipment, and/or energy efficiency. C.Goals: The application from Parea, LLC, meets the following EDLF program goals: •Increases employment opportunities; •Stimulates business development and expansion; •Encourages private investment; •Promotes economic development; •Enhances neighborhood vitality; and, •Boosts commercial enterprise. D.Program. The EDLF is a program administered by the Department of Economic Development, which is charged with maintaining the corpus of the EDLF in a manner sufficient to perpetuate the goals of the program. Each loan application is pre-screened, and an underwriting analysis and economic impact statement are completed before an application may be recommended for Loan Committee (see below) review. Information on successful applications is transmitted to the Council to consider for final approval. E.Available balance and amount of outstanding loans. The Finance Department reported that the Fund’s cash on hand was $8,700,000 on March 19, 2024. Outstanding loans totaled $3,754,305 as of that date. F.EDLF Committee Membership. The Department of Economic Development lists nine members of the EDLF Committee as follows: City Employees Community Volunteers 1. Finance Director, Community and Neighborhoods Department 2. Salt Lake City Business Advisory Board (BAB) member 3. Representative of the Mayor’s Office 4. Banker 5. Salt Lake City employee at large 6. Community lender Page | 3 7. Representative of the Division of Housing Stability 8. Business mentor 9. Director, Department of Economic Development 10. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to have a policy discussion with the Administration about interest rates charged by the City from this and other loan funds, and whether it makes sense to re-evaluate how interest rates are determined for lenders, especially since the City typically offers loans as a lender-of-last-resort. 2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the EDLF Committee considered any other unique information about this business that would help Council Members with their own evaluations of how this application compares to others. For example, are there risk factors that are evaluated for each company, like outstanding loans, years in business, etc.? 3.What outreach does the Department do to ensure a diverse pool of businesses successfully applies to the EDLF? Are applications from diverse owners, particularly those whose businesses are located on the Westside, offered additional support through the application process? Does EDLF staff have ideas for improving access that would benefit from program changes or additional funding? 4. The Council may wish to request a more general update on EDLF use and processes. This could include the number of applications, review criteria used, loan program goals, etc. i Source: Small Business Lending Survey, Small Business Lending Demand Continues to Decline. Consulted on March 26, 2024, at https://www.kansascityfed.org/surveys/small-business-lending- survey/small-business-lending-demand-continues-to-decline-december-2023/. DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ERIN MENDENHALL MAYOR LORENA RIFFO-JENSON DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL _______________________ Date Received: ___________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: ___________ __________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: March 21, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Director, Department of Economic Development SUBJECT: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund (EDLF) – (Parea LLC) STAFF CONTACTS: Roberta Reichgelt, Business Development Director, Roberta.reichgelt@slcgov.com Project Manager, Brian Pantle, Brian.Pantle@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Loan Approval RECOMMENDATION: The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of $350,000 loan to Parea LLC. BUDGET IMPACT: $350,000 from the Economic Development Loan Fund BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On February 29th, 2024, a loan request from Parea LLC was presented to the EDLF Loan Committee for review and discussion. A new quick style restaurant/market along the 900 South that will sell Greek Food from award winning Chef Manoli Katsanevas. Basic Loan request Business Name: Parea LLC Address: 320 East 900 South Loan Amount Requested: $350,000 Loan Term: 7 Years Interest Rate: 11.50% Use of Funds: Buildout of restaurant augmenting Manoli’s investment in the build out. Loan Type: Startup – However an exemption was made given the experience and history Manoli has as a restaurateur in Salt Lake City. Council District: D5 Reasoning behind staff recommendation rachel otto (Mar 25, 2024 16:30 MDT) 03/25/2024 03/25/2024 Applicants of The Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) go through a thorough application process consisting of a pre-screening, underwriting analysis and economic impact statement. Only after the loan applicant goes through these processes, then the loan is recommended to be reviewed by the Loan Committee members. Upon the thorough review of the Loan Committee members then a recommendation is made before the loan is transmitted to the Mayor for Council to receive the recommendation for final approval. Because the Loan Committee review process must adhere to the Open Meetings Act, DED’s staff has worked closely with the City Attorney’s Office to ensure that applicants’ information is protected and at the same time the public process is followed. In addition, the EDLF loans must meet the following goals of the Economic Development Loan Fund as stated in the EDLF program guidelines. This loan meets the EDLF program guidelines in the following areas. •Increasing employment opportunities. •Stimulating business development. •Encouraging private investment. •Promote economic development. •Enhancing neighborhood vitality. •Boosting commercial enterprise. This loan will assist in the creation of 15 new jobs in the next year and retention of 30 current jobs. This loan was recommended by the EDLF Committee to the City Council for approval. EDLF Loan Balances 1.As reported from The Finance Department on 3/19/2024, the EDLF available fund balance is: $8,700,000. 2.As of 3/19/2024 the amount of outstanding loans total is: $5,612,706.27 EDLF Loan Committee There is a total of nine (9) EDLF Committee members. City Employees: 1.Community and Neighborhoods Finance 2.Mayor’s Office 3.Employee at large 4.Housing Stability 5.Economic Development Community Volunteers: 6.Business Advisory Board (BAB) member 7.Banker 8.Community lender 9.Business mentor Attachments: Terms Sheet and Ordinance ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 15, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2023-00444 – Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts STAFF CONTACT: Lex Traughber, Senior Planner (801) 535-6184 or lex.traughber@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Landmark Commission and the Planning Commission both voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for consideration. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Proposal Snapshot: The proposed text and guideline amendments impact properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay which includes properties within local historic districts and landmark sites. Salt Lake City currently has 14 local historic districts and approximately 150 Landmark Sites. The proposed changes add clarity to existing processes in terms of appropriate window materials, window location, and window installation in new construction projects. The following summarizes the proposed changes: Proposed Changes/Additions: •Adds a section to 21A.34.020(H) to clarify prohibited window material (vinyl) and window location, as well as a minimum window installation depth (3”). __________________________ rachel otto (Feb 22, 2024 15:08 CST)02/22/2024 02/22/2024 • Adds additional language to the Residential and Historic Apartments & Multi-family Design Guidelines to clarify historically appropriate window materials (Wood, clad wood, and fiberglass) in new construction, the appropriate location and use of vinyl windows in new construction, and the use of aluminum storefront windows at the ground floor where there is a commercial use or amenity space associated with a multi-family building. Issue Origin: Like many historic districts throughout the United States, new infill construction is a regulated design subject to review by local municipalities. In many cases, cities have created design guidelines that help define common elements of historic buildings that should be reflected in new construction. Many cities and towns also have specific ordinance standards addressing new construction as opposed to standards for the treatment of historic structures. This is the case for Salt Lake City. The approach to the design of alterations to historic structures, where it is critical to incorporate and conserve historic materials, forms, and details naturally vary from approaches toward new construction, in which the primary goal is to integrate the new building into the surrounding historic environs that create the character of the historic property or district. Salt Lake City has followed many of its peers in creating a dual set of standards for historic and new buildings in its historic districts, as well as creating design guidelines to specifically address new construction. A rudimentary set of standards were included in the city’s first preservation ordinance in 1976, with most design reviews of new construction reviewed by the then Historic Landmark Committee informally using unadopted, externally developed guidelines, usually developed based on national thinking at the time. In many cases, standards for additions were adapted for new construction. Issues of consistency raised their heads at times. Efforts to standardize both the approach and processes used by the HLC culminated in a new set of standards set forth in the 1995 zoning ordinance rewrite, shortly followed by published design guidelines completed in 1998, which included an extensive section on new construction. Consistent application and interpretation, particularly regarding design details such as window design, continued to be a problem. This factored into a larger reexamination of the city’s preservation program, in which clear and consistent, easy-to-understand standards and guidelines were cited as a goal by stakeholders including residents, developers, and policymakers. In 2012, the city rewrote its design guidelines for residential buildings, greatly expanding the guidelines for new construction. Guidelines for multi-family residential and commercial new constructions soon followed in 2015. Later, the city updated its ordinance standards for new construction, again with the goal of increased clarity and consistency. This evolution has gradually improved the success of projects, both in design and length of review processes and required design revisions. In particular, the new ordinance standards in 21A.34.020.H provide vastly improved clarity for applicants, planning staff, and the members of the HLC in the course of evaluating new construction. While the concepts of the earlier ordinance remain, the new standards elaborate on these concepts and provide clearer standards of approval that can be tied to adopted design guidelines. Evaluation: While broader issues such as building scale, massing, form, and primary materials are being successfully addressed with recent changes, it is increasingly apparent that the standards and guidelines could be improved for clarity when it comes to the design details of new buildings. In particular, issues have emerged in how the existing ordinance standards and guidelines are applied in the case of windows on new principal buildings (single and multifamily), particularly in terms of window material and the manner in which a window is installed. Issues with Current Standards and Design Guidelines: In general, there is ample direction in the city’s standards and guidelines regarding window size, shape, types, fenestration pattern, and location. All of these attributes are clearly apparent in the building design when it is submitted for review. Planning staff is able to make findings for the HLC, who can then determine whether the project meets these standards and determine whether the windows are appropriate. At present, inconsistencies arise in review in terms of window material and window installation. The issue is actually three fold: • First, the current design standards and guidelines somewhat dance around the use of vinyl as an appropriate window material. The design guidelines “discourage” the use of vinyl windows as they are not considered to be a historically appropriate nor a durable material, but they do not outright prohibit their use. There is little guidance toward consistency in what determines an appropriate window material, other than discouraging the use of vinyl as a non-durable material, and encouraging the use of “durable materials” (presumably wood, metal clad wood, composite, etc). As a result, the HLC has required wood or metal clad wood windows on some projects, fiberglass or composite on others, has approved vinyl in many instances, and in rare cases not addressed a window material at all in their final approval. • Second, design standards and guidelines are somewhat vague regarding the requirement for windows to be set back from the primary wall plane. Section 21A.34.020.H(6)(c) of the zoning ordinance states, “Windows and other openings are incorporated in a manner that reflects patterns, materials, and detailing established in the district and/or setting.” This is based on traditional building patterns and is also intended to provide variation in the wall plane, creating visual interest, and again references traditional design and construction methods. In response to this zoning requirement, planning staff has typically asked developers to include a minimum 3” window reveal and the HLC has approved this window installation detail many times. That said, nowhere in the design standards and guidelines is the depth of a window reveal outlined or stipulated. • Finally, the manner in which the issue of appropriate window materials and installation in new construction projects is not consistent between the various design guideline documents (Residential and Historic Apartment & Multifamily Buildings), and therefore they cause confusion and uncertainty. The Historic Apartment & Multifamily Building Guidelines are in fact more extensive and descriptive than the Residential Design Guidelines in terms of windows in new construction, however both documents could be ameliorated to provide more clarity. Consistency and clarity is needed between these documents, as well as the zoning ordinance, to further address windows in new construction projects. Scope and Severity of Problem: The problem outlined here is most apparent in large-scale multi-family residential projects which take up more and more time on each HLC agenda. Again, this is not a new phenomenon; ordinance revisions, new design guidelines, and process changes dealing specifically with window approvals are evidence that the HLC has wrestled with this many times before. However, the HLC is wrangling with an approach to windows in a broader building climate in Salt Lake City that has seen a record number of large-scale, multifamily residential projects proposed throughout the city. Logically, it also follows that the larger the building, the more windows the building will have. The window cost in multifamily buildings typically takes up a larger proportion of the overall budget than in smaller projects, making it an attractive line item on which to make changes or opt for less expensive, often vinyl, windows. Likewise, current design trends tend toward the use of materials that do not create a change in depth between the face of the wall plane and the face of the window. While the design guidelines call for materials that “provide a solid masonry character for lower floors and for the most public facades of the building.” (Guideline 12.69) it is typical to use another material such as siding or stucco on the upper stories of a large multifamily building, particularly those in which several levels of stick-built construction sit on a two or three-story concrete framed base. It is much more difficult to place a recessed window in these types of walls. Problems such as those enumerated above are much more common on these upper stories, and it is in these locations where problems are most apparent. Taking the observational or anecdotal data as well as the data analysis above into account, it is apparent that a goal for further reviews of new construction is to: • Ensure that the ordinance standards and design guidelines are met with regard to windows installed in new construction projects; • Provide consistency in windows approved for new construction projects; address the specific use of vinyl windows and window installation. Adopted Policy: Preservation Policy: In November, 2011, the Salt Lake City Council adopted a Preservation Philosophy (Resolution 53 of 2011) to guide the City’s Preservation Program. Some of the policy directives from this document relate directly to the current project, namely: • Achieve a successful city-wide historic preservation program by clearly conveying historic preservation objectives, opportunities, and benefits while consistently interpreting and applying the City's adopted standards and efficiently administering the process. • The Historic Preservation Overlay District standards are to be used as the basis for decision making when considering applications for Certificates of Appropriateness. Apply standards in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. The proposed amendments aim to make standards clear and predictable to improve applicants’ understanding of the requirements and decision makers’ ability to efficiently administer the zoning ordinance. Community Preservation Plan: Another significant guiding document for Salt Lake City’s historic preservation program is the Community Preservation Plan (2012). This document adds context, detail, and direction in implementing the broad outlines of the city’s adopted preservation philosophy. The Community Preservation Plan has a number of policies related to the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments include new language to clarify appropriate and inappropriate window materials, placement/location, and installation in new construction projects in the City’s local historic district. The following policies outlined in this plan are relevant to the proposed amendments: Policy 4.2b: Improve user-friendliness of the decision-making process. The City will work to make participation in the preservation program as clear, predictable, and as easy as possible. This will be achieved through developing informational resources and making necessary procedural changes. Policy 4.2c: Ensure informational resources are available to assist applicants in knowing the requirements, and timeframes for each step to help them successfully navigate the process. Policy 6.1c: Encourage the use of sustainable building practices that comply with adopted policy, guidelines and regulations relating to historic preservation in the renovation and maintenance of historic structures. Policy 6.1d: Ensure adopted guidelines and regulations allow for the appropriate use of green building practices as they emerge. Policy 6.1e: The incorporation of green building practices is encouraged whenever they are compatible with best historic preservation practices. Plan Salt Lake: Finally, preservation is mentioned as a specific objective of Plan Salt Lake (2015), Salt Lake City’s citywide master plan with the guiding principle of “maintaining places that provide a foundation for the City to affirm our past.” Additional context and guidance are given to this citywide objective through a series of initiatives, many of which directly relate to and support the proposed changes. • Preserve and enhance neighborhood and district character. • Retain areas and structures of historic and architectural value. • Integrate preservation into City regulation, policy, and decision making. • Balance preservation with flexibility for change and growth. • Improve education and outreach about the value of historic preservation. The purpose statement for the H – Historic Preservation Overlay District is as follows: In order to contribute to the welfare, prosperity and education of the people of Salt Lake City, the purpose of the H historic preservation overlay district is to: 1. Provide the means to protect and preserve areas of the city and individual structures and sites having historic, architectural or cultural significance; 2. Encourage new development, redevelopment and the subdivision of lots in historic districts that is compatible with the character of existing development of historic districts or individual landmarks; 3. Abate the destruction and demolition of historic structures; 4. Implement adopted plans of the city related to historic preservation; 5. Foster civic pride in the history of Salt Lake City; 6. Protect and enhance the attraction of the city's historic landmarks and districts for tourists and visitors; 7. Foster economic development consistent with historic preservation; and 8. Encourage social, economic and environmental sustainability. The proposed amendments, in clarifying and updating language to incorporate new development criteria that are critical to the implementation of the city’s Historic Preservation Program are fully consistent with these purposes. Commission Recommendations: The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed this application on November 2, 2023, and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for consideration. The Planning Commission considered this application on January 10, 2024, and subsequently voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for consideration. PUBLIC PROCESS: • March 2, 2023 – Work Session – A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC asked for some additional follow-up information. • May 4, 2023 – Windows Tour – Conducted a tour with the Historic Landmark Commission to look at various examples (both good and bad) of window types and installations, in and around the Capitol Hill and South Temple Local Historic Districts. • May 4, 2023 – Work Session – A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC directed Planning Staff to pursue a “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows in new construction in the City’s historic districts. • August 21, 2023 – Open House – An on-line open house was posted to the Planning Division’s website to solicit comment from the public regarding the proposed zoning ordinance text language and design guidelines language. • October 23, 2023 – Consistent with State law, a notice of the Historic Landmark Commission meeting was posted at the Marmalade, Sweet, Anderson Foothill, and Main Libraries. • October 19, 2023 - Public notice for the November 2, 2023, HLC hearing was posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve. • November 2, 2023 – Historic Landmark Commission public hearing. The HLC voted unanimously to support the proposed changes and to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. • January 10, 2024 – Planning Commission public hearing. The PC voted unanimously to support the proposed changes and to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. HISTORIC LANDMARK & PLANNING COMMISSION RECORDS: a) HLC Agenda of November 2, 2023 (Click Here) b) HLC Minutes of November 2, 2023 (Click Here) c) HLC Staff Report of November 2, 2023 (Click Here) d) PC Agenda of January 10, 2024 (Click Here) e) PC Minutes of January 10, 2024 (Click Here) f) PC Staff Report of January 10, 2024 (Click Here) EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts Petition PLNPCM2023-00444 January 2023 Petition assigned to Lex Traughber. March 2, 2023 A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC asked for some additional follow-up information. May 4, 2023 Conducted a tour with the Historic Landmark Commission to look at various examples (both good and bad) of window types and installations, in and around the Capitol Hill and South Temple Local Historic Districts. May 4, 2023 A work session was held with the Historic Landmark Commission to obtain direction regarding the proposed amendments. The HLC directed Planning Staff to pursue a “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows in new construction in the City’s historic districts. June 6, 2023 Petition initiated by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall. August 16, 2023 A notification was sent to all Recognized Organizations to solicit comment regarding the proposed zoning ordinance text language and design guidelines language. August 21, 2023 An on-line open house was posted to the Planning Division’s website to solicit comment from the public regarding the proposed zoning ordinance text language and design guidelines language. October 19, 2023 Public notice for the November 2, 2023, HLC hearing was posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve. October 23, 2023 Consistent with State law, a notice of the Historic Landmark Commission meeting was posted at the Marmalade, Sweet, Anderson Foothill, and Main Libraries. November 2, 2023 Historic Landmark Commission public hearing. The HLC recommended a couple of small wording changes, but voted unanimously to support the proposed changes and to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. January 10, 2024 Planning Commission public hearing. The PC voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation on to the City Council for consideration. January 11, 2024 Requested an ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office. January 26, 2024 Received ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office. February 12, 2024 Transmittal submitted to CAN. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00444 – Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic District – A request made by Mayor Erin Mendenhall directing the Planning Division to update the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance and the Historic Residential and Multifamily/Historic Apartment Design Guidelines, to address the use of vinyl windows in new construction projects in the City’s Local Historic Districts (LHDs). As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: **This meeting will not have a physical location. **This will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation. If you are interested in participating in the Public Hearing, please visit our website at https://www.slc.gov/council/ to learn how you can share your comments during the meeting. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801)535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Lex Traughber at (801) 535-6184 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail at lex.traughber@slcgov.com People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: May 9, 2023 Re: Initiate Petition to Amend Text in the Zoning Ordinance, Residential and Multifamily Design Guidelines to Update, Coordinate, and Clarify the Use of Vinyl Windows in New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts (LHDs) This memo is to request that a petition be initiated directing the Planning Division to update the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, the Historic Residential and Multifamily/Historic Apartment Design Guidelines, to coordinate and clarify the use of vinyl windows in new construction projects in the City’s Local Historic Districts (LHDs). Two work sessions have been held with the Historic Landmark Commission to discuss the matter and obtain proposal direction. The first work session was held on March 2, 2023 and the second was held on May 4, 2023. At the work session in May, the Historic Landmark Commission directed Planning Staff to pursue a “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows in the City’s LHDs. A “hybrid” approach to the use of vinyl windows includes the exploration of where vinyl windows may be appropriate in new construction projects, how any vinyl windows are installed, and the relation of the vinyl window to proposed building cladding. A hybrid approach would allow for the reasonable use of vinyl windows on a new construction project along with the use of more historically appropriate windows such as wood, wood clad, or composite windows. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the City’s adoption process for zoning text amendments, which includes citizen input and public hearings with the Historic Landmark Commission, Planning Commission, and the City Council. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. _____________________________________ ______________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date 4. ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (An ordinance amending Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code and amending the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District.) An ordinance amending Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code and the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023- 00444. WHEREAS, on November 2, 2023, the Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission (“Landmark Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00444) to amend Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code and the adopted design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; and WHEREAS, at its November 2, 2023 meeting, the Landmark Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) and the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said petition; and WHEREAS, at its January 10, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the city council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.34.020.H. That Subsection 21A.34.020.H of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Standards for Certificate of Appropriateness Involving New Construction or Alteration of a Noncontributing Structure) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: H. Standards for Certificate of Appropriateness Involving New Construction or Alteration of a Noncontributing Structure: In considering an application for a certificate of appropriateness involving new construction, or alterations of noncontributing structures, the historic landmark commission, or planning director when the application involves the alteration of a noncontributing structure shall, using the adopted design guidelines as a key basis for evaluation, determine whether the project substantially complies with each of the following standards that pertain to the application to ensure that the proposed project fits into the established context in ways that respect and contribute to the evolution of Salt Lake City’s architectural and cultural traditions: 1. Settlement Patterns and Neighborhood Character: a. Block and Street Patterns: The design of the project preserves and reflects the historic block, street, and alley patterns that give the district its unique character. Changes to the block and street pattern may be considered when advocated by an adopted city plan. b. Lot and Site Patterns: The design of the project preserves the pattern of lot and building site sizes that create the urban character of the historic context and the block face. Changes to the lot and site pattern may be considered when advocated by an adopted city plan. c. The Public Realm: The project relates to adjacent streets and engages with sidewalks in a manner that reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. Projects should maintain the depth of yard and height of principal elevation of those existing on the block face in order to support consistency in the definition of public and semi-public spaces. d. Building Placement: Buildings are placed such that the project maintains and reflects the historic pattern of setbacks and building depth established within the historic context and the block face. Buildings should maintain the setback demonstrated by existing buildings of that type constructed in the district or site’s period of significance. e. Building Orientation: The building is designed such that principal entrances and pathways are oriented such that they address the street in the pattern established in the historic context and the block face. 2. Site Access, Parking, and Services: 3 a. Site Access: The design of the project allows for site access that is similar, in form and function, with patterns common in the historic context and the block face. (1) Pedestrian: Safe pedestrian access is provided through architecturally highlighted entrances and walkways, consistent with patterns common in the historic context and the block face. (2) Vehicular: Vehicular access is located in the least obtrusive manner possible. Where possible, garage doors and parking should be located to the rear or to the side of the building. b. Site and Building Services and Utilities: Utilities and site/building services (such as HVAC systems, venting fans, and dumpsters) are located such that they are to the rear of the building or on the roof and screened from public spaces and public properties. 3. Landscape and Lighting: a. Grading of Land: The site’s landscape, such as grading and retaining walls, addresses the public way in a manner that reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. b. Landscape Structures: Landscape structures, such as arbors, walls, fences, address the public way in a manner that reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. c. Lighting: Where appropriate lighting is used to enhance significant elements of the design and reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. 4. Building Form and Scale: a. Character of the Street Block: The design of the building reflects the historic character of the street facade in terms of scale, composition, and modeling. (1) Height: The height of the project reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. Projects taller than those existing on the block face step back their upper floors to present a base that is in scale with the historic context and the block face. (2) Width: The width of the project reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. Projects wider than those existing on the block face modulate the facade to express a series of volumes in scale with the historic context and the block face. (3) Massing: The shape, form, and proportion of buildings, reflects the character of the historic context and the block face. (4) Roof Forms: The building incorporates roof shapes that reflect forms found in the historic context and the block face. 5. Building Character: 4 a. Facade Articulation and Proportion: The design of the project reflects patterns of articulation and proportion established in the historic context and the block face. As appropriate, facade articulations reflect those typical of other buildings on the block face. These articulations are of similar dimension to those found elsewhere in the context, but have a depth of not less than 12 inches. (1) Rhythm of Openings: The facades are designed to reflect the rhythm of openings (doors, windows, recessed balconies, etc.) established in the historic context and the block face. (2) Proportion and Scale of Openings: The facades are designed using openings (doors, windows, recessed balconies, etc.) of similar proportion and scale to that established in the historic context and the block face. (3) Ratio of Wall to Openings: Facades are designed to reflect the ratio of wall to openings (doors, windows, recessed balconies, etc.) established in the historic context and the block face. (4) Balconies, Porches, and External Stairs: The project, as appropriate, incorporates entrances, balconies, porches, stairways, and other projections that reflect patterns established in the historic context and the block face. 6. Building Materials, Elements and Detailing: a. Materials: Building facades, other than windows and doors, incorporate no less than 80% durable material such as, but not limited to, wood, brick, masonry, textured or patterned concrete and/or cut stone. These materials reflect those found elsewhere in the district and/or setting in terms of scale and character. b. Materials on Street-Facing Facades: The following materials are not considered to be appropriate and are prohibited for use on facades which face a public street: vinyl siding and aluminum siding. c. Architectural Elements and Details: The design of the building features architectural elements and details that reflect those characteristic of the district and/or setting. 7. Windows: Windows and other openings are incorporated in a manner that reflects patterns, materials, and detailing established in the district and/or setting. a. Window installation depth: Window reveals shall be a minimum of three inches. b. Prohibited window material: Vinyl windows are not considered to be historically appropriate nor durable, and are prohibited for use where they are readily visible from the street (public and private). 8. Signage Location: Locations for signage are provided such that they are an integral part of the site and architectural design and are complementary to the principal structure. 5 SECTION 2. Amending the text of “A Preservation Handbook for Historic Residential Properties & Districts in Salt Lake City”. That the adopted design standards for residential structures in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District set forth in the manual titled “A Preservation Handbook for Historic Residential Properties & Districts in Salt Lake City” shall be, and hereby is amended to revise Chapter 12 in the section pertaining to “Windows” that begins on page 12:13 thereof to read as follows: Windows Window openings often provide a considerable degree of modeling to the building facades, with a distinctive recess (window reveal) of the plane of the window from the plane of the wall. This characteristic enhances the visual strength of a facade, conveying a sense of the depth and solidity of the wall, and distinct areas of shadow which change with the time of day and the season. This recess also helps to shelter the window and the window frame. Windows also provide a medium for fine detail and craftsmanship, using decorative pattern, lead and often stained glass. 12.20 Windows with vertical emphasis are encouraged. • A general rule is that the height of a vertically proportioned window should be twice the dimension of the width in most residential contexts. • Certain styles and contexts, e.g. the bungalow form, will often be characterized by horizontally proportioned windows. • See also the discussions of the character of the relevant historic district (PART III) and architectural styles (Ch.4, PART I). 12.21 Window reveals should be a characteristic of most facades. • This helps to emphasize the character of the facade modeling and materials. • It should enhance the degree to which the building integrates with its historic setting. • It also helps to avoid the impression of superficiality which can be inherent in some more recent construction, e.g. with applied details like window surrounds. • Typical historic window reveals are 3-4” in depth. 12.22 Windows and doors should be materials that appear similar in scale, proportion and character to those used traditionally in the neighborhood. 6 • Double-hung windows with traditional reveal depth and trim will be characteristic of most districts. • Window profiles should project from the plane of the glass creating a distinct hierarchy of detail for the window opening and the composition of the facade. • Durable window frame construction and materials should be used. • Window frame finish should be of durable architectural quality, chosen to complement the building design. • Wood, clad wood, and fiberglass are generally appropriate window materials. • Vinyl should be avoided as a non-durable material in the regional climate. • Vinyl windows, on rear and secondary facades, where they are not readily visible from the street (public or private), will be considered on a case-by-case basis. • See also the rehabilitation section on windows (PART II, Ch.3) as well as the discussions of specific historic districts (PART III) and relevant architectural styles (PART I, Ch.4). SECTION 3. Amending the text of “Design Guidelines for Historic Apartment & Multifamily Buildings in Salt Lake City”. That the adopted design standards for apartment and multifamily structures in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District set forth in the manual titled “Design Guidelines for Historic Apartment & Multifamily Buildings in Salt Lake City” shall be, and hereby is amended to revise Chapter 12 in the section pertaining to “Windows” that begins on page 12:57 thereof to read as follows: WINDOWS Of the many architectural characteristics of the design of a building façade, the design of the windows is perhaps the most important. Window openings provide a considerable degree of modeling and detail to the facades, with the window reveals creating a distinctive recess of the plane of the reflective window from the plane and texture of the wall. Window reveals enhance the sense of visual strength of the facade, conveying an impression of the depth, solidity and permanence of the wall. The difference in plane between window and wall surface also creates distinctive light, shadow and reflection which will change with the time of day, and also with the season. This recess also helps to shelter the window and the window frame, and helps to moderate solar gain. Window openings and design are the focus of finer frame detailing and craftsmanship, in the past using classical frame profiles, decorative subdivided or leaded lights and often stained glass. The form, the subdivision and the profiles of the window framing, their finishes and 7 colors, play a major role in creating the modeling, detailing, quality and richness, and consequently the perceived scale of the building. Design Objective The design of a new multifamily building should include window design subdivision, profiles, materials, finishes and details which ensure that the windows play their characteristic positive role in defining the proportion and character of the building and its contribution to the historic context. 12.71 Windows should be designed to be in scale with those characteristic of the building and the historic setting. • Excessive window scale in a new building, whether vertical or horizontal, will adversely affect the sense of human scale and affinity with buildings in the district. • Subdivide a larger window area to form a group or pattern of windows creating more appropriate proportions, dimensions and scale. 12.72 Windows with vertical proportion and emphasis are encouraged. • A vertical proportion is likely to have greater design affinity with the historic context. • It helps to create a stronger vertical emphasis which can be valuable integrating the design of a larger scale building within its context. • See also the discussion of the character of the relevant historic district and architectural styles (PART I). 12.73 Window reveals should be a characteristic of most facades. • These help to express the character of the facade modeling and materials. • Window reveals will enhance the degree to which the building integrates with its historic setting. • A reveal should be recessed into the primary plane of the wall, and not achieved by applying window trim to the façade. • This helps to avoid the impression of superficiality which can be inherent in some more recent construction, e.g. with applied details like window trim and surrounds. • A hierarchy of window reveals can effectively complement the composition of the fenestration and facades. • Typical historic window reveals are 3-4” in depth. 8 12.74 Windows and doors should be materials that appear similar in scale, proportion and character to those used traditionally in the neighborhood. • Window profiles should project from the plane of the glass creating a distinct hierarchy of detail for the window opening and the composition of the facade. • Durable window frame construction and materials should be used. • Window frame finish should be of durable architectural quality, chosen to complement the building design. • Wood, clad wood, and fiberglass are generally appropriate window materials. • Vinyl should be avoided as a non-durable material in the regional climate. • Vinyl windows, on rear and secondary facades, where they are not readily visible from the street (public or private), will be considered on a case-by-case basis. • Aluminum storefront windows may be appropriate at the ground floor where there is a commercial use or amenity space associated with a multi-family building, and will be considered on a case by case basis. • Dark or reflective glass should be avoided. • See also the rehabilitation section on windows (PART II, Ch.3) as well as the discussions of specific historic districts (PART III) and relevant architectural styles (PART I). SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 9 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance amending window regulations new construction in historic districts (final) APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Paul C. Nielson, Senior City Attorney January 26, 2024 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC STAFF CONTACT: Joe Taylor, Transportation Planner IV, Joe.taylor@slcgov.com, or (801) 535-6679 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Administration has developed the Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC (the Plan) to replace the existing Transportation Master Plan. The Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan, while a remarkable and progressive document for its time, was adopted in 1996. Much has changed since that time, including transportation planning practices and the zeitgeist of how we think about public rights-of-way. Mobility of goods and services is still of necessity, but it shares space with notions of safety, accessibility, and concerns for the environment. The policy landscape within Salt Lake City has also changed dramatically since the mid-1990s. Plan Salt Lake (2015) laid out the City’s vision, aiming to prepare our city for growth while simultaneously focusing on sustainability and livability. At the root of the vision is quality of life for current and future generations. Specifically, in the realm of transportation, Salt Lake City has adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2015) and a Transit Master Plan (2017). These rachel otto (Mar 24, 2024 12:41 MDT)03/24/2024 03/24/2024 plans provide a list of projects that the City hopes to accomplish to bring transit and active transportation into parity with our current autocentric landscape. In this context, Connect SLC (formally the Transportation Master Plan) aims to take the values espoused by the former plans, as well as those we heard from the community during development of the Plan update, and to imbue all transportation projects, initiatives, and day-to- day operations with those values. Much like Plan Salt Lake, Connect SLC is intended to function as a Citywide plan that brings consistency not only to the Transportation Division’s work, but also to the City as a whole, recognizing that many divisions and departments of the City touch our transportation system in some way. According to the vision of Connect SLC “It is our plan, envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices. Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and safety, expand access to opportunities, and improve air quality.” KEY MOVES: The Plan lays out eight key moves to advance these values in our transportation network: 1. Authentic and Intentional Engagement • Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices at the planning table. 2. Zero Traffic Deaths • Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all. 3. Great Networks for Active Mobility • Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health outcomes. 4. Transit Friendly Neighborhoods • Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City. 5. Healing the East-West Divide • Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside neighborhoods. 6. Low Emission Mobility Options • Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our streets. 7. Places for People • Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community gathering places. 8. Operationalize Complete Streets • Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership. PUBLIC PROCESS: Engagement began with the creation of a Community Advisory Council (CAC). Through a formal application process, we identified nine individuals who would be compensated hourly for their work on the project. The CAC gave ideas directly, helping shape the broader community engagement plan. They also participated in events, edited documents (including the final draft of the Plan), and perhaps most importantly, gave us access to their own networks. With the help of the CAC, we launched a public engagement effort that asked the community what they value most in their transportation system. Results from an online survey and in-person events conducted at pop-up vaccine clinics were weighted to reflect city demographics, in this case, adjusting for a lack of people 18 and under. Individuals who live, work, and/or go to school in Salt Lake City identified safety from harm, affordability, reliability, equity, and sustainability as their top transportation values. The project team then took these values and created a large menu of policy options to address them. The policy areas that received the most public support formed the basis of the second round of engagement, detailed below. A total of 879 (15 in Spanish, 864 in English) people responded to the City’s online survey and approximately 60 people participated through in-person outreach. While demographic information was not consistently collected for in-person participants, these events focused on reaching communities who were under-represented in online survey responses, particularly people who live in Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods. The full report for the first round of engagement, including geographic and demographic analysis of the respondents, is included in Exhibit 4 of this document. The second round of engagement took the values identified in the first round and created a menu of policy options that could potentially advance those values. These policy options were explained with both written explanations and visual representations. Participants could vote online for the concepts that best addressed their desires and concerns. Participants were also able to plot points on a map of the city and identify problems or highlight things that worked well. This process was also conducted at several in-person events where participants could use stickers and post-it notes to vote on the concepts. In-person engagement took place at the following locations: • Three Creeks Park Dedication • Northwest Recreation Center (timed to coincide with a soccer tournament) • Living Traditions Festival • West High School • Gail Miller Resource Center • Spy Hop Block Party • University Neighborhood Partners/Partners in the Park • Salt Lake City Homeless Resource Fair (Madsen Park) Since individuals could vote multiple times and demographic information was not collected, the exact number of individuals responding to the second round of engagement was not collected. However, we received thousands of responses during this round. We had a native Spanish speaker present to help with engagement at some of these events, and the results were significant enough to be highlighted in Key Move 1 of Connect SLC. After the second round of engagement, staff took two additional internal engagement steps. First, in order to address City representation, we presented the project to the Planning Commission and the City Council for the first time. Recommendations from these entities included focus on the following areas: safety, integration with land use policy, and continued effort toward complete street programs for critical east-west corridors These comments were integrated into the plan, specifically in Key Moves 2, 5, 7 and 8. Second, the work was presented to a meeting of City department directors. This work session allowed other departments and divisions to voice any concerns and create space for suggestions on how the Plan could better integrate with other City efforts across departments. The draft plan was presented to the Planning Commission on November 8, 2023. The Commission unanimously recommended adoption by the City Council with the following text amendment: “Section 1.3 be amended to read, Strategy 1.3 facilitates long term dialogue between the City, the local community, and other reginal partners. For Strategy 2.1 to establish a vision zero action plan, to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and awareness about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City.” Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan 2) 1996 Transportation Master Plan (Currently Adopted) 3) Draft Citywide Transportation Plan – Connect SLC 4) Survey Report (First round of public engagement) 5) 2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (Adopted) 6) 2017 Transit Master Plan (Adopted) EXHIBIT 1: Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. ___ OF 2024 (Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan) WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a, the Municipal Land Use, Development, and Management Act (the “Act”), on December 7, 2015, the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) passed Ordinance No. 63 of 2015 to adopt Plan Salt Lake as a general plan; and WHEREAS, as part of Salt Lake City Corporation’s (“City”) general plan, on July 19, 1996, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 19 of 1996 adopting the Transportation Master Plan of 1996 (the “1996 Transportation Masterplan”) as a guiding document for transportation policy; and WHEREAS, since its adoption, significant changes in the state of transportation policy and practice, as well as concerns regarding safety, sustainability, mobility preferences, and equity considerations have rendered the adopted 1996 Transportation Master Plan valuable but obsolete; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 8, 2023 to consider recommending adoption of Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan (the “2023 Transportation Plan”), as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, at its November 8, 2023 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council to adopt the 2023 Transportation Plan as provided in Exhibit "A” attached hereto; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that the adoption of this ordinance is in the City’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. Adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan. That Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is hereby adopted to replace the 1996 Transportation Masterplan as part of City’s general plan, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a. 2. Jurisdiction. That Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan shall apply within the City’s municipal boundaries to their full extent. 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of ___________________, 2024. .2 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: ______________________________ Victoria Petro, Chair ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: _______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. MAYOR ___________________________ CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM (SEAL)Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __________________________ Bill No. ________ of 2024 Published: ______________. _______________________________ Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney March 6, 2024 ___________________________ : _____________________ Montoya, Senior City Attor March 6, 2024 EXHIBIT 3: Connect SLC :The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan HARDWARE GROCERIES A P T S PHARMACY RESTAURANT CafeP DOWNTOWN Cafe Salt Lake City · August 2023 DRAFT As the capital city of Utah, it is important for Salt Lake City to not only recognize the First Nations peoples and the meaningful role they play within our everyday urban fabric, but also to lead out in true partnership with them. The contributions of the Ute, Paiute, Goshute, Dine’/Navajo, and Shoshoni are immeasurable and we strive as a city to move forward in consultation and true collaborative leadership with our relatives. —Mayor Mendenhall Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan2 3 Acknowledgments SALT LAKE CITY Joe Taylor, Project Manager Julianne Sabula Lara McLellan Becka Roolf Amy Thompson Michael McNamee Roxanna Orellana Ashley Cleveland C.J. Johnson UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Alex Beim Joey Alsop WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL COUNCIL Nikki Navio UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Angelo Papastamos Grant Farnsworth CONSULTANT TEAM Nelson\Nygaard Avenue Consultants Shiels Obletz Johnsen SPECIAL THANKS West High School Gail Miller Resource Center Salt Lake City Public Library Neighborworks Salt Lake Neighborhood House Northwest Rec Center Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan4 Contents 1. Our vision ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Getting around Salt Lake City ...........................................................................................16 3. Community engagement ...................................................................................................22 4. Aligning transportation with our values..........................................................................32 5. Key Moves ............................................................................................................................44 Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement ...........................................................................50 Zero Traffic Deaths .........................................................................................................................60 Great Networks for Active Mobility ..............................................................................................68 Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods ...................................................................................................76 Healing the East-West Divide ........................................................................................................84 Low Emissions Options ...............................................................................................................112 Places for People .........................................................................................................................126 Operationalize Complete Streets ..............................................................................................130 6. Achieving our vision .........................................................................................................140 5 Our vision Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan6 1 Connect SLC is a 20-year vision for transportation in Salt Lake City. It is our plan, envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices. Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and safety, expand access to opportunities, and improve air quality. Connect SLC identifies how we move today, what we value, how we want to improve public spaces, and what improvements would make it easier for us to move around Salt Lake City (SLC). Through our transportation programs, policies, and investments, we can directly influence the quality of life for people who live in, work in, and visit our city. 7 HARDWARE GROCERIES A P T S PHARMACY RESTAURANT P DOWNTOWN Business people meet on the street to walk and talk. Residents gather on the street to protest. Tourists take a stroll, enjoying a street performance while heading out to dinner. Kids learn about traffic safety and how to navigate the world while walking to school. People take a leisurely midday bike ride. Our streets are not just a means to move people and goods. They provide space for public life, economic exchange, and community gathering. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan8 Plan Salt Lake Specialized Plans and Studies Area and Community Plans SLC Transit Master Plan SLC Pedestrian Master Plan Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide Complete Streets Ordinance C N N E C T S L O Project timeline Select Community Advisory Committee SUMMER Set Community Values, Vision, and Framework Phase 1 Engagement FALL Develop Key Policies and Programs Phase 2 Engagement WINTER - SUMMER Developthe Key Moves FALL Compile the Plan SPRING - SUMMER Adopt the Plan FALL 2021 2022 2023 TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN C N N E C T S L O Project Timeline How does Connect SLC relate to other plans? Connect SLC is rooted in the building blocks of Plan Salt Lake to “Establish and articulate a citywide vision for Salt Lake City.” It focuses specifically on the Plan Salt Lake guiding principles of Neighborhoods, Growth, Transportation, Air Quality, Beautiful City, Equity, and Economy. 9 What has SLC accomplished since the 1996 Transportation Plan? Salt Lake City’s last citywide transportation plan was completed in 1996. Since that time, our population has grown and our neighboring communities whose residents work and go to school in SLC have also expanded dramatically. We’ve taken many steps to improve the transportation options available for our growing community. The first TRAX light rail line opens from Downtown SLC to Sandy SLC publishes its Transportation Plan The Complete Streets Executive Order requires SLC streets to be designed, operated, and maintained for all modes of traffic, including for people walking and biking, and for travelers of all ages and abilities The Complete Streets Ordinance codifies the prior Executive Order, ensuring that the policy remains in place The Winter Olympics leads to an expedited expansion of I-15 that includes high- occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes The Downtown in Motion Master Plan presents a vision for separated bike lanes downtown FrontRunner commuter rail begins operating from SLC to Ogden Bike corrals are first added to SLC streets at the request of local businesses, replacing a single car parking space with a 10-bike rack A western segment of the 9-Line Trail is constructed along the old 900 South railroad corridor 50 miles of new and redesigned bikeways open in SLC—the largest annual expansion in the city’s history The North Temple multimodal corridor opens with bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and the Green Line TRAX serving SLC airport, providing an important multimodal east–west connection 20021996 2008 2011 1999 2007 2010 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan10 Utah’s first bicycle traffic signal is installed on 1300 South and 600 East at the south end of Liberty Park Over 130 hybrid-electric or all-electric vehicles are included in the City’s fleet The McClelland Trail and the University to Downtown Bikeway opens GREENbike, Utah’s non-profit bike share program, launches in SLC Streetcars return to SLC with the opening of the S-Line and the passage of the Sugar House Circulation Plan The first dockless scooter companies launch in SLC as part of an 18-month Dockless Shared Micro-Mobility pilot University of Utah and Brigham Young University sign deal with the UTA and issue free transit passes for all students SLC constructs its first protected bike lane, a 2-block segment along 300 East SLC’s first protected intersection for bikes opens, connecting protected lanes on 300 South to 200 West—the second protected intersection in America and the first one constructed using Federal funds The 600 East Neighborhood Byway opens—the first low-speed, low-volume street optimized for comfortable bicycle and pedestrian travel in Utah The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan declares walking and bicycling as integral to SLC’s transportation system Plan Salt Lake provides a 25-year vision to balance growth, sustainability, and livability UTA pilots fare free transit for one month—“Free Fare February” SLC Council approves updates to residential and off-street parking requirements to support affordable housing and help meet climate goals Utah Transit Authority (UTA) establishes permanent on-demand service to Southern Salt Lake County and SLC WestsideThe Transit Plan was developed, prioritizing the frequent transit network, pilot programs for shuttles, enhanced bus corridors, and transit access improvements 2015 2016 20222018 2013 2017 2012 2021 11 What key issues does Connect SLC address? SLC is one of the fastest growing urban areas in the country. In 2022, SLC was among the top ten fastest growing cities in the country,1 growing by 14,000 residents or 7.5% since 2010. An additional 30,000 residents are projected in the next 20 years.2 The surrounding metropolitan area, including Salt Lake and Tooele Counties, are projected to grow even faster. A growing population means more demand on our streets, and more people traveling in, around, and out of the city. SLC must focus on housing affordability and bringing people closer to destinations. Our transportation system supports a vibrant downtown core and provides access to businesses throughout SLC. Downtown in Motion was developed to revitalize the core and connect people to transit. Recent housing policy changes also allow for more density by permitting the construction of missing middle housing. When more homes and destinations are closer together, it is easier for people to take transit, walk, and bike to meet their daily needs. Effective transportation and land use policy is a powerful tool in addressing affordability by bringing residents closer to essential services, healthy food options, and jobs. Transportation decisions have divided SLC, hindering Westside neighborhoods. People living in Westside neighborhoods are disconnected from jobs, recreation, and essential services due to I-15, I-80, freight rail tracks, and other large projects. While investment occurs in the Westside, there has been a lack of outreach to and collaboration with historically marginalized communities, leading to distrust and an inability to address the needs of the community. Future transportation investments must reflect the voices and needs of people in the Westside neighborhoods. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan12 There are limited transportation options to combat climate change. The American Lung Association 2022 State of the Air report card ranks SLC at 20th in the nation for short-term particle pollution,3 and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has consistently spotlighted the city for its dangerous levels of pollutants. Ozone pollution is exceptionally high in the region, of which 50% is directly generated by motor vehicles.4 Transformational changes are needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. Promoting active transportation and increasing use of public transit by expanding transit options are essential to meeting climate goals set forth in the SLC Climate Positive 2040 Resolution. Traffic deaths are on the rise. During the COVID-19 pandemic, motor vehicle traffic declined, but traffic deaths increased. Pedestrian and bicycle traffic fatalities and series injuries have gone up. Utah had a record number of bicycle and vehicle fatalities in 2021.5 In 2023, SLC committed to eliminating traffic fatalities by joining the Vision Zero Network. Changes to policy and public infrastructure are critical to protect and ensure the safety of our most vulnerable road users. Addressing safety encourages residents to walk, bike, and roll. Travel options are needed for people traveling at all times of day. Traffic in the morning and evening commute hours has decreased compared to pre- pandemic levels. The COVID-19 pandemic showed that travel for essential services is spread throughout the day. Future transportation decisions must be inclusive of all travel patterns, not just those of commuters during the typical peak hours. 13Chapter 1: Introduction Vision We envision a Salt Lake City where everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices that support safety, health, and sustainability. Our commitment to a more equitable future Connect SLC centers equity in our transportation planning process, focusing on those who have been negatively impacted by past policies and investments, and highlighting the critical need to address the accessibility, connectivity, and mobility challenges experienced by people and communities who have historically been historically left out of the decision-making process. 14 Connect SLC Transportation Master Plan 2023 Goals Our goals—articulated through public input and crafted by the project’s Community Advisory Committee—inform the Key Moves and associated strategies and actions to achieve them. Equity Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Health and Safety Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Reliable Options Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Affordability People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Sustainability Our transportation system incorporates a range of design solutions, technologies, and mobility options to aggressively reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions caused by vehicle use. 15Chapter 1: Introduction Getting around Salt Lake City Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan16 2 We envision a transportation system that is safe and reliable for people walking, rolling, biking, and taking transit. So safe and reliable, in fact, that they are preferred travel options! Currently, driving feels to many like the safest and most reliable way to get around, but not everyone can drive and our climate and city can’t sustain the impacts of so many vehicle trips. Our transportation system does not fully meet the diverse and varied needs of our community. Whether it’s commuting to work, taking a walk to nearby parks, or biking to school, more work is needed to overcome historical barriers for people who navigate the city without personal vehicles. 17 (Other) Getting to work Most commutes are made by driving alone, putting stress on existing roadways and slowing our progress towards cleaner air. How do people get to work in SLC? Source: 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates 63% drive alone to work 13% typically work from home (significant increase after the COVID-19 pandemic) 6% take transit, and fewer walk (5%) and bike (3%)5% 3% 250K+ people work within SLC. 83% live outside SLC city limits and travel into SLC on a regular basis. Providing convenient regional transportation options is key to meeting the needs of longer- distance commuters. Each person in this graphic represents 10,000 commuters Source: LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics, 2019 “Please do a better job of accounting for people who don’t drive in cars everywhere they go. Streets seem designed only for drivers, and everyone else seems like an afterthought.” “The city has an overabundance of on-street parking… We should rethink our use of that space for greater public benefit, like micro-parks, placemaking, transit and pedestrian islands, and bicycle storage.” ENGAGEMENT SPOTLIGHT Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan18 Riding a bike Addressing safety challenges Pedestrian, bicyclist, and motorcyclist casualties from road- based collisions are rising. Source: UDOTZeroFatalities Year-to-Year Fatality Dashboard SLC enjoys great access to mountains and nature, with extensive trails outside the urban area. However, getting to these destinations without a private vehicle is challenging. Demand is rising for an all-ages-and-abilities bicycle network to make bicycling a viable means of reliably getting around the city both for commuters and for recreation. 138 miles of shared-use trails across SLC. While this is an invaluable resource, many trails still don’t connect safely to places where people live or need to go. 322 94 12 traffic collisions claimed 322 lives in Utah in 2022 ... ... of which 94 fatalities took place within Salt Lake County ... ... representing an increase of 12 fatalities from 2021 14% of streets in SLC have designated bikeway infrastructure.6 The citywide bicycle network is incomplete, with many gaps that prevent access to existing trails. 3% of people ride a bike to work,7 but many others also bike to local stores, restaurants, and services. New projects such as the 9 Line and McClelland trails are helping to build out the 2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. 19 A long walk around the block Standard blocks in SLC are twice as long as in most major cities, making it challenging to connect to transit and other destinations without using a personal vehicle. Ridership on the S-Line Streetcar surpassed pre-pandemic levels in summer 2022, as high-density residential developments are completed along the corridor. This is a testament to the benefit of transit-oriented development. UTA On Demand saw a 300% increase in ridership in the first year of service, with more than 1,000 rides provided in December 2022. Taking transit Transit ridership on UTA buses, FrontRunner, and TRAX light rail is well below pre- pandemic level, but people are coming back to transit.8 How much has ridership recovered since the pandemic? There are new opportunities that inspire hope for transit in SLC: 81% 67% 59% DOWNTOWN Fe b 2 0 2 0 r i d e r s h i p Bus ridership FrontRunner rail ridership Light rail ridership Cafe A P T S STORE RESTAURANT P 660ft Salt Lake City 200ftblocks 660ftblocks 300ftblocks Salt Lake City San Francisco Portland (OR) Source: UTA Ridership, Feb. 2020 and Feb. 2023 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan20 Innovative transportation solutions are adapting to changes in the way we travel REMOTE AND HYBRID WORK A shift to remote and hybrid work has transformed how and when we travel. DEMAND AT ALL TIMES OF DAY Where traditional transit services remain scheduled to serve peak hour travel, the success of UTA’s On Demand and S-Line streetcar show how serving riders at all times of day is more important than ever before. NEW COMPLEMENTARY OPTIONS New mobility options will continue to play an important role to complement bus and rail services and provide more options for people in SLC to move around. DOWNTOWN 21 Community engagement Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan22 3 Connect SLC is a community-driven plan. It is grounded in ideas from families, youth, seniors, people of color, people with disabilities, people who are unhoused, people who are not fluent in English, and other people who have historically been left out of the conversation. We connected with people in three ways: • A community Advisory Committee • Two online surveys • In-person workshops and conversations with people at community events The Connect SLC engagement process sought to understand community values around transportation, identify what people saw as our biggest challenges and issues, and gain insight into key moves that would help address our most pressing needs. 23 • Launch Project Webpage • Invite applications for the Community Advisory Committee Project Kickoff • Identify community values for transportation Phase 1 Engagement • Design big ideas and key moves for transportation • Host SLC Westside Charrette Week Phase 2 Engagement •Unveil final Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan Final Plan 2021 2022Community Outreach and Engagement Timeline 2023 What was the community engagement timeline? Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan24 Who is the Community Advisory Committee? Connect SLC convened a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) to ensure diverse perspectives of the community were represented in shaping the plan. We developed a framework for selecting a representative group of residents, then put out an open call for membership applications. Members were selected based on their diverse skills, experiences, community involvement, and unique transportation perspectives, and were compensated for their time. The CAC included nine members from the SLC community bringing diverse professional and lived experiences of navigating the transportation network as people of color, people with disabilities, and other underrepresented populations. The CAC helped shape the plan through meetings and tours covering: How to effectively engage the community CAC members provided feedback on the public engagement plan for Connect SLC Goal setting CAC members refined plan goals and values, and defined opportunities and challenges facing our transportation system Key Moves and strategies The CAC informed solutions and strategies to improve our streets and transportation network Solutions for east– west connectivity The CAC walked parts of the city where I-15 and rail tracks divide our neighborhoods and discussed future solutions City staff also met with CAC members in smaller groups to review plan goals, key moves for the future of transportation, and other critical elements of the draft plan. Throughout the planning process, CAC members played a key role in conducting in-person engagement and outreach directly in their communities. 25 Phase 1: Transportation Values Connect SLC engagement began with a focus on understanding what community members valued and how systems for mobility and access influenced our collective ability to achieve those values. Connect SLC vision and goals are drawn from these conversations. What we did We collected public feedback on transportation values online and in-person. This effort coincided with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing much of our in-person efforts to pivot from their original design. • An online survey was available in English and Spanish and asked respondents to rank what they value in a transportation system. • An interactive Community Values Tapestry activity asked community members to prioritize values in a transportation system during in-person events. Due to the pandemic, in-person events were limited to pop up vaccine clinics at Westside elementary schools. While the number of responses was smaller than we might have hoped, the people we heard from represent historically underrepresented communities. community members reached through in-person events and online surveys939 The Community Values Tapestry was an interactive activity asking the community to share their most important values related to transportation. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan26 What we heard Values The community’s top values were Reliability, Air Quality and the Environment, Safety, and Affordability. The CAC added Equity as a value. Outcomes Community members identified the following important outcomes. Improve zero- and low-emission options (walking, bicycling, transit) Improve road pavement conditions Increase transit frequency and reliability Enhance street lighting Ensure transit is affordable Reduce traffic speeds Widen sidewalks EQUITY SAFETYRELIABILITY AFFORDABILITYAIR QUALITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT DOWNTOWN A B DOWNTOWN 27 Phase 2: Big Ideas The second phase of community engagement presented 14 potential strategies to improve our transportation network and support the Connect SLC vision and values. We called these strategies our “Big Ideas” for transportation. What we did Pop-up events The project team and the CAC conducted multiple in-person pop-up events. These events were focused on reaching underrepresented populations, such as unhoused people, youth, and residents of Westside neighborhoods. We asked people to give feedback on the Big Ideas and had a map available for participants to note specific improvements. At least one Spanish-speaking staff member was present at each pop-up. Pop-ups were organized at the following locations and events: • Gail Miller Resource Center • Art @ The Confluence • West High School • Living Traditions Festival • Spy Hop • University Neighborhood Partners • Northwest Recreation Center Interactions 2,479 Events 7 These boards asked the public to weigh in on which ideas to improve transportation in SLC were most important to them. The prevention of traffic deaths, making transportation affordable, expanding transit, and creating public spaces were the four highest rated suggestions of the 14 options shown. Photo: Salt Lake City. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan28 StoryMap A web-based StoryMap provided in English and Spanish was distributed online to complement the Pop-Up events. The StoryMap included a short description of each Big Idea and allowed people to indicate their level of support. An interactive map allowed participants to place points and draw lines in places where they saw opportunity for transportation improvements. Visits to the StoryMap 800+ StoryMap interactions 702 Points and lines added to the map 120 Westside Connections Charrette Week The Westside Connections Charrette Week brought together residents, community-based organization leaders, city staff, and agency partner staff to document gaps and identify ideas for transportation and public space improvements between Westside and Eastside neighborhoods. Activities included stakeholder interviews and a facilitated walking tour, or “Walkshop.” The Walkshop, which included members of the CAC, provided a first-hand experience of the persistent challenges of Westside transportation infrastructure and barriers crossing I-15 and the railroad tracks. Local residents and city staff came together for a “walkshop” along major divides between the Westside and Eastside neighborhoods to discuss challenges and opportunities. Photo: Salt Lake City Interactive online map survey from StoryMap engagement. Photo: Connect SLC 29 What we heard Participants in the Phase 2 online survey and in-person events voiced the strongest support for these five Big Ideas: • Price options relative to people’s income: Provide free transit, continue Free Fare February, and expand the existing Free Fare Zone. • Grow the city’s tree canopy: Increase the tree canopy in support of climate adaptability. • Create more safe places to cross the street: Improve safety at intersections, crosswalks, and on the streets in general. Fast vehicle speeds and the width of streets make it discouraging and dangerous for people to walk. • Support frequent, connected transit: Provide frequent and connected transit that is a reliable and sustainable alternative to driving. Improve service in Westside neighborhoods and expand transit to run on evenings and weekends. Install improved bus stops that provide shelter. • Reconnect neighborhoods: Reconnect neighborhoods that have been divided by highways. Augment public space and improve connections between neighborhoods for people who walk, roll, and bike. People also shared their own Big Ideas for transportation. • Improve and add protected bike lanes. Connect existing bike lanes to form a network and separate them from pedestrians and cars to facilitate more bike trips. • Enforce and educate for safety. Enforce lower speed limits. Educate drivers and transit operators to look out for people walking and biking. • Prioritize people, not cars. Design for more density in the city. Decrease dependency on cars to improve air quality, especially on high inversion days. Focus on increasing foot traffic to support local businesses. On wide streets, reallocate space used for cars to space for people—widen sidewalks and add bike lanes. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan30 Internal engagement The Connect SLC team engaged staff from many City departments that help deliver and manage the City’s mobility options. These people bring an important perspective and can represent input from the very many citizens they interact with in their work. Presentations and check-ins Progress on the plan was presented to the following internal organizations throughout the process. Feedback was collected and incorporated at every stage. • Bicycle Advisory Committee • Accessibility and Disability Commission • Transportation Advisory Board • Salt Lake City Planning Commission • Mayor’s Office of Equity and Inclusion • Salt Lake City Council Internal City workshops A series of internal City workshops with staff and Division Directors were conducted to help shape the plan. These workshops were critical to gain buy-in and allow the various divisions that work in the right-of-way to provide critical input to ensure successful implementation of the plan. “I really enjoyed getting to work with other people in my community who are passionate about improving transportation for everyone. Our meetings were always collaborative and focused on making sure the most underserved members of our community had a voice in the proposed changes. With lots of events and feedback, we were able to create a plan that aims to include all of the diverse groups within SLC.” —Testimonial from CAC member Tessa Nicolaides 31 Aligning transportation with our values Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan32 4 Connect SLC is rooted in our community’s values and collective desire to provide equitable access to jobs, schools, housing, parks, and community resources. Our community values affordable transportation options, clean air and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and streets that keep everyone—especially our most vulnerable travelers—safe. Community values shape Connect SLC From November 2021 through January 2022, Salt Lake City (SLC) conducted an online and in-person citywide survey to understand the public’s priorities and values for transportation. This engagement was the foundation for shaping the Connect SLC vision and goals. Five goals emerged, informed by the values we heard from the community: Equity: Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Health and Safety: Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Reliable Options: Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Affordability: People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Sustainability: Our transportation system incorporates a range of design solutions, technologies, and mobility options to aggressively reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions caused by vehicle use. 33 Equity Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Our challenges Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods are home to the city’s greatest concentration of people of color, people with low incomes, young people, people with disabilities, and people who speak English as a second language. Streets, sidewalks, and transportation infrastructure and services in Westside neighborhoods have been shaped by historic disinvestment and many of the most polluting, harmful transportation uses have been located in this area. Westside neighborhoods have more sidewalk gaps, fewer transit options, and fewer bike facilities than other parts of the city. While Westside neighborhoods are some of the most affordable places to live in SLC, residents are at a high risk of displacement.9 The City must balance new investment with strategies to prevent displacement. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City has made progress in improving transportation options and facilities for Westside neighborhoods. The reconstruction of 900 South and the 300 North pedestrian and bicycle bridge provide much-needed west-to-east connections. The Westside Transportation Equity Study proposes many equity-driven engagement strategies and transportation projects and the City was awarded a Reconnecting Communities grant in 2023 to help foster east–west connectivity. The City has also recently initiated complementary efforts for equitable food access, housing, and gentrification mitigation. “Me preocupa que el transporte público aumente los precios de la renta y la vivienda. Me gustaría que nuevos proyectos tomen en consideración el impacto económico en las comunidades de bajos ingresos porque no quiero que mi comunidad sea desplazada.” “Everyone should have equal access to the transportation, regardless of ability or disability.” “Equitable access to the community through transportation, especially for marginalized communities, should be the primary focus of any plan. Focus on making transportation improvements in low-income areas in ways that residents will use and appreciate.” Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan34 This map presents the census tracts within Salt Lake City limits by equity score, which represents the concentration of people of color, with low income, with disabilities, and other factors within the tract. Areas with the highest concentration are on the west side of I-15. 35 Health and Safety Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other mobility device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Our challenges SLC’s streets pose a challenge to safety. There were 400 severe and fatal crashes in SLC from 2016-2020; 40% involved someone walking or riding a bicycle. SLC’s block lengths and streets widths are twice as long and wide as other major U.S. cities. People are more likely to drive faster when streets are wide, and higher vehicle speeds in crashes involving pedestrians mean a lower chance of survival. Wide streets also mean it takes people longer to cross the street, and they are more exposed to vehicles travelling at high speeds. This risk is even higher for people who move slower due to age or disability. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City is committed to Vision Zero, the goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries. To meet this goal, the City will build on the work of the multi-department Safe Streets Task Force to analyze crashes and identify where future interventions are needed to prevent traffic injuries and deaths. The City has also partnered with the Utah Department of Transportation’s Zero Fatalities program for safety education. Along with our partners at the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC), SLC is one of six communities to receive a Federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant. The grant will allow WFRC to coordinate with the selected communities on the creation of a regional traffic safety action plan. The work will help SLC and its neighbors to generate new and useful ideas and policy for safer streets regionwide. “I often fear for my safety any time I’m not traveling in a car. This is mostly due to wide roads and unsafe crossings. Cars travel too fast and too close to the sidewalk in many places.” “Zero transportation related deaths should be the #1 priority.” “I would like to bike and walk more; many streets and sidewalks don’t make me feel safe.” “I just want protection from the drivers. I’d like to see young and old feel confident moving around their home city on their feet or bicycle without risking their lives.” Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan36 This map shows the locations within SLC where fatal and severe injuries from traffic collisions took place, with the highest concentration of collisions clustered in Downtown and along Redwood Road and State Street. 37 25 30 50 chance of pedestrian fatality or severe injury 25% mph mph mph chance of pedestrian fatality or severe injury 50% chance of pedestrian fatality or severe injury 90% Vehicle speed and risk of pedestrian fatality There is a strong correlation between vehicle speeds and the risk of pedestrian fatality or severe injury.10 Lower speeds are a key component of improving roadway safety for all. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan38 Reliable Options Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Our challenges A reliable transportation system gets people where they need to go on time and provides a smooth, comfortable experience. If transit comes at unpredictable times, or sidewalks always need maintenance and are covered in snow or debris, then people have a hard time depending on taking transit or walking. In SLC, transit typically takes much longer than driving, buses and trains don’t come often enough, and transit stops aren’t always close enough to provide a seamless connection. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City has identified a Frequent Transit Network to target fast, reliable bus service through infrastructure improvements like transit lanes and signal improvements. The City is also working with UTA to build multimodal mobility hubs to connect great walking and biking options to transit service and concentrate amenities like bikeshare, bike parking, and public space. “Reliability is important for me because I work full-time at a hospital and being on time for work is a priority.” “People need to be able to trust their transportation when planning for their day.” “If I can’t count on the system, I’m not going to use it.” 39 Affordability People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Our challenges Housing and transportation are the biggest expenses for most households. Affordability continues to be a primary concern for residents in SLC.11 On average, housing and transportation costs account for 39% of household spending, and the cost of transportation increases as residents live further away from the central area of SLC.12 People with low incomes typically cannot afford to live near their workplaces and have longer commutes.13 For people who are unhoused or living in severe poverty, the costs of car ownership or transit passes can be an obstacle to meeting daily needs. What’s in motion? There are several programs in SLC to support transit affordability: • UTA Reduced Fare FAREPAY Card provides a 50% discount off the public fare to all qualifying seniors, youth, persons with disabilities, and individuals who qualify based on income. • Hive Pass Program is a half-price ($42/mo) pass available to SLC residents. • Student Pass Programs provide passes to students of all ages. All students in the SLC school district and their parents receive free passes. Students, staff, and faculty at the University of Utah and Brigham Young University can access free transit by using their campus ID cards, thanks to a partnership with UTA. • Fare Free February was a pilot in February 2022 where UTA provided free transit for one month to increase ridership and to remove the cost burden of transportation for all Utahns. Fare Free February was touted as a success with noticeable increases in ridership during the fare free month. The largest increases were observed on Saturdays. Average Saturday ridership in February was up 58.1% over January. Weekday ridership was up 16.2% and Sunday ridership was up 32.5%.14 Source: UTA Fare Free February Final Report (2022) “I work with a lot of underprivileged folks in the community and wish it were easier and cheaper to use the bus and TRAX.” “Affordability means more access to more people.” “Public transportation should be free to people under the poverty line.” Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan40 This map illustrates the areas in SLC with households that spend the greatest proportion of their income on housing and transportation costs. People living in the most northeastern and southeastern parts of the city bear the highest transportation cost burden, corresponding to the lack of transit access in those neighborhoods. The costs are increasingly higher the farther one lives from Downtown. 41 Sustainability The people of Salt Lake City can use convenient transportation options that help to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality. Our challenges Salt Lake City’s air quality is among the worst of any U.S. city. Poor air quality is particularly harmful to children, the elderly, and people with chronic conditions such as heart and lung disease, and disproportionately affects people with lower incomes and people of color. Researchers from the University of Utah found that schools in SLC with predominantly low-income and non-white students were disproportionately exposed to air pollution, even on clean air days. Motor vehicle emissions are a major contributor to climate change, which has exacerbated the drought conditions that are contributing to rapidly reduced water levels in the Great Salt Lake. The drying lake poses the threat of toxic arsenic-laced dust being blown into the city. What’s in motion? Salt Lake City’s Climate Positive 2040 aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2040 and will focus on transportation emissions. The Clean the Air Challenge and Idle Free Utah are two initiatives SLC has in place to encourage more sustainable modes of transportation. “Air quality is worsening in Salt Lake City and I want our children to inherit a healthy city.” “Climate change is our biggest threat. I would love to see a more expansive public transport system across different areas in the valley.” Climate Positive 2040 “The Department of Sustainability is an expression within local government of broader values and priorities shared by our residents. Climate Positive 2040 is a synthesis of these goals that not only conveys how to address climate change, but also how to pursue system level change and create outcomes desired by local individuals, families and businesses.” Director of Sustainability, Vicki Bennett CLIMATE POSITIVE + 2040 Salt Lake City is committed to protecting the public health and safety of its residents, including ensuring access to clean air, clean water and a livable environment. Climate Positive 2040 highlights the transformational changes needed for Salt Lake City to reach long-term climate and energy goals. Salt Lake City is prioritizing a near-term transition to clean, renewable energy to remove carbon pollution from electricity generation that makes up over half of the community carbon footprint. This plan represents a holistic approach for Salt Lake City government, businesses and households to reduce carbon pollution and build resiliency to impacts and vulnerabilities in a warming world. A high-level timeline with key target dates is included below and complements strategic steps for energy, food and social systems that are detailed in the following pages. Climate Positive is supported by more detailed, prescriptive action plans already created or in development for Salt Lake City – hyperlinks to these reports are included in the online version of Climate Positive. DEFINING CLIMATE POSITIVE EFFICIENT BUILDINGS ZERO WASTE RESILIENCY SUSTAINABLE FOOD RENEWABLE ENERGY CLEAN TRANSPORTATION 80% REDUCTION IN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR COMMUNITY ELECTRICITY 204020322020 ENHANCED PREPAREDNESS & LIVABILITY 50% RENEWABLES FOR MUNICIPAL ELECTRICITY REDUCTION IN POLLUTION & CA R B O N E M I S S I O N S Source: Salt Lake City Climate Positive 2040 (2017) Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan42 Salt Lake City’s air quality is among the worst of any U.S. city #8 for high ozone days #17 for daily particle pollution Ozone is high in the summer Particulates are high in the winter when the Salt Lake Valley experiences inversions Warm air high in the atmosphere acts like a lid Cold air and pollution are trapped lower down between the mountains ����� Motor vehicles account for about half of all emissions in Salt Lake City Improvements in vehicle technology have led to cleaner air 50% Emissions Bad air quality is bad for residents’ health Parts of SLC have a higher rate of asthma than 95% of the nation Kids and other vulnerable populations are especially impacted Data Sources: American Lung Association, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, CDC Places Why is air quality a major problem in Salt Lake City? 43 Key Moves Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan44 5 Key Moves are how we move to action and achieve our transportation goals This section describes the eight Connect SLC Key Moves as well as their strategies, actions, and evaluation metrics. The Key Moves are: Authentic and Intentional Engagement Healing the East- West Divide Zero Traffic Deaths Low-Emissions Mobility Options Great Networks for Active Mobility Places for People Transit Friendly Neighborhoods Operationalize Complete Streets DOWNTOWN 45 KEY MOVE 2 Zero Traffic Deaths Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all. 2.1 Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan Action: Convene a Vision Zero working group Action: Embrace the Safe Systems approach to traffic safety Action: Analyze crash history and create a plan for action 2.2 Create safer streets Action: Take advantage of federal funding opportunities Action: Focus on high-injury corridors and intersections Action: Reduce vehicle speeds KEY MOVE 1 Authentic and Intentional Engagement Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices at the planning table.  3rLorLtL]e XQGerserYeG SoSXOatLoQs aQG ParJLQaOL]eGbYoLces Action ΖPSroYe sta΍ XnGerstanGinJ oI the local coPPXnit\ b\ PeetinJ people where they are Action: Partner with Community-Based Organizations in equity areas and bXilG caSacit\ Ior SXblic enJaJePent Action &enter coPPXnit\ inSXt anG neeGs in GirectinJ IXtXre inYestPents Ior the :estsiGe  5eGeȴQe eQJaJePeQt as aQ oSSortXQLt\ Ior cocreatLoQ Action: Give communities agency in planning contexts and empower neiJhborhooG Yoices in leaGinJ oXtreach e΍orts Action: Compensate community participants to value their time and contributions  )acLOLtate OoQJterP oQJoLQJ GLaOoJXe EetZeeQ the &Lt\ aQG the OocaO coPPXQLt\ Action Establish ePbeGGeG coPPXnit\ IocXs JroXSs or aGYisor\ Sanels Action ActiYel\ GePonstrate the oXtcoPes oI coPPXnit\ inSXt Action 8SGate the enJaJePent JXiGe Zith a ZorNSlan Ior recXrrinJ collaborative co-creation Overview of Key Moves, strategies, and actions Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan46 KEY MOVE 3 Great Networks for Active Mobility Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health outcomes. 3.1 Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity Action: Designate a Pedestrian Priority Network Action: Adopt crossing guidelines Action: Identify the greatest needs for improving active mobility 3.2 Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options Action: Implement low-stress facility design Action: Adopt an equitable shared mobility policy Action: Improve work zone standards 3.3 Create active spaces Action: Create slow, shared, and car-free streets Action: Activate alleys KEY MOVE 4 Transit Friendly Neighborhoods Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel iQ 6alt /ake &ity . 0ake transit convenient and reliable ActioQ ΖQstitXtioQali]e 6/& aQG 87A SartQersKiS witK a MoiQt taskforce oQ advancing transit ActioQ ([SaQG tKe cityȇs bXs laQe aQG traQsit siJQal Sriority 763 Qetwork . Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces ActioQ ([SaQG 6/&ȇs 'owQtowQ APbassaGors SroJraP to sXSSort aQG sta΍ traQsit facilities ActioQ :ork witK 87A to XSJraGe bXs stoSs iQ 6/& witK SasseQJer aPeQities ActioQ +arQess tecKQoloJy to PoGerQi]e PaMor traQsit facilities aQG waitiQJ areas . (nhance the urban conte[t to make transit an attractive option ActioQ (stablisK PXltiPoGal Pobility KXbs iQ local areas of iPSortaQce aQG fXtXre JrowtK Action: Improve access-to-transit infrastructure to complete tKe cityȇs street Qetwork ActioQ 8se 6Pall Area aQG &ircXlatioQ SlaQs to eQcoXraJe GeQse GeveloSPeQt aroXQG statioQ areas 47 KEY MOVE 5 Healing the East-West Divide Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside neighborhoods. 5.1 Develop a community-driven east–west transportation strategy Action: Elevate voices of communities on the Westside and those most impacted by transportation infrastructure Action: Center human safety, health, and experience Action: Craft a community-centric East-West Transportation Strategy that addresses immediate needs and inspires bold action 5.2 Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks Action: Develop fast implementation projects that stitch the east–west divide Action: Develop bold concepts to repair and build community Action: Improve transportation options that support safe, affordable east–west travel 5.3 Reclaim spaces to serve community and function at a human scale Action: Create a program to bring life and community identity to “below the freeway” spaces Action: Foster local and grassroots efforts to envision remedies and uses for “in between” spaces Action: Rethink freeway ramps 5.4 Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods where prosperity is shared Action: Develop complete, inclusive, transit-oriented neighborhoods Action: Use grade and elevation to create great experiences KEY MOVE 6 Low-Emissions Mobility Options Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and eɝciently manage our streets 6.1 Build awareness and use of transportation options Action: Hire a transportation options program manager to enhance employer outreach Action: Expand student and education pass programs Action: Implement a transportation wallet Action: Incentivize developers to incorporate transportation demand management TD0 into the development process 6.2 Manage existing parking supply Action: Consolidate parking functions under a new parking program Action: Understand parking utilization and performance Action: Optimize a single mobile parking application  &ommunicate a uniȴed parkinJ strateJy and Erand Action: Create an updated parking brand and communications plan Action: 3rioriti]e clear and consistent wayȴnding and signage Action: Pilot a park-once-and-walk district in Downtown SLC  'eYelop a curE manaJement strateJy Action: Conduct a survey for existing curb uses across Salt /ake City Action: Implement a project to pilot innovative and shared curb uses Action: Develop Curb Management Guidelines Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan48 KEY MOVE 7 Places for People Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community gathering places. 7.1 Leverage private investment in high growth areas Action: Create public realm action plans Action: Incentivize developers to implement adopted street concept plans Action: Establish a green street network 7.2 Promote connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts Action: Value street and alley vacations Action: Require midblock pathways KEY MOVE 8 Operationalize Complete Streets Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through e΍ective partnership. 8.1 Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design and management Action: Integrate Complete 6treets into the full proMect development lifecycle Action: 6tructure proMect development teams to ensure accountability Action: Establish a Complete 6treets 6teering Committee 8.2 Develop tools to guide decision-making Action: 8pdate the 4uality 7ransportation Improvement 3rogram screening tool to align with Connect 6LC Action: 'evelop datadriven storytelling tools to support Complete 6treets assessments Action: Align capital proMects with policies and best practice 8.3 Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development Action: )ormalize use of the 6treet and Intersection 7ypologies 'esign *uide in proMect development Action: Require compliance with the 6treet and Intersection 7ypologies 'esign *uide in the Complete 6treets assessment 49 Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement Build lasting relationships and empower diverse community voices to shape transportation decisions. Centering equity and community voices in decision-making rejuvenates public enthusiasm and trust in the transportation planning process. We continue to build on the active and inclusive engagement started during Connect SLC to shape a future informed by community. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 1 Equity: Salt Lakers are informed and involved participants in the planning process. Equity: Solutions for transportation are co-created with the community, not just for the community. Equity: Salt Lake City residents have trust in the planning process, feel that their voices are actively being heard by decision-makers, and see the results. Photo source: Salt Lake City Our strategies 1.1 Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices 1.2 Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation 1.3 Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City and local community Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan50 What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • A lack of trust and relationships has opened a chasm between the community and the agencies that are making transportation decisions. • SLC has identified best practices for existing engagement practices, but more still needs to be done. The community is looking for more transformative, participatory means of direct engagement with transportation planning. • Historically underserved communities, particularly those living in Westside neighborhoods, are skeptical that top-down planning decisions will serve their needs. “Transformation in our approach [to public engagement], rather than more techniques.” —SLC Westside Transportation Equity Study “Our historic and personal biases are far from just. In this process, as in all our work, the goal is to take ownership of the past and strive to do better in the future.”—SLC Westside Transportation Equity Study WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • Salt Lake City’s Civic Engagement Team has an established Engagement Guide that details best practices, tactics, and checklists on the technical aspects of engagement. • The Westside Transportation Equity Study is a landmark report that calls out the disparity in transportation infrastructure across different neighborhoods in SLC, highlighting the need for a transformative approach to reengage the Westside. • The State of Transportation Equity in Utah (Utah Division of Multicultural Affairs) is a 2022 report conducted by the state of Utah, outlining the disparities that exist in transportation access in the state. • Connect SLC established a process to pay community members to serve on the Community Advisory Committee. “Meet people on the street, at bus stops, at grocery stores, and other gathering places to ask for their input.” —Community Advisory Committee, Connect SLC Engagement Spotlight 5151 Case Study: NYCDOT Street Ambassador Program (New York, NY) NYC Department of Transportation’s Street Ambassador program engages residents in their communities. The program was launched in 2015 to engage residents around upcoming projects and establish long-term, ongoing connections with the community to increase their understanding of planning concepts and the changes that are possible on city streets. Best Practice Takeaways: • Be intentional about seeking out and hearing from marginalized groups. • Assemble a multi-lingual team ready to engage with residents regardless of English language proficiency. • Think creatively about where to engage with residents. As well as places like senior centers and libraries, Street Ambassador teams canvass at malls, public beaches, and movie theaters. • Design the engagement strategy as an entry point into the planning profession, creating pathways to leadership and future opportunities for community members. Strategy 1.1: Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices Amplify the voices of communities that have been historically disenfranchised by planning processes and level the playing field in civic participation. ACTION Improve staff understanding of the local community by meeting people where they are Formal public meetings can be a barrier to many people, since they traditionally take place during the evenings when white-collar workers (including planners) are available, while those with varying shift jobs are not. This skews engagement toward those who work during the day and have the time, energy, and resources to attend, while often missing the voices of those directly impacted by changes. To truly meet our residents where they are means beginning with an understanding of who they are and what challenges they face. Strategies include: • Tabling at shopping centers, community centers, and places of worship at all hours and on all days of the week. • Recognizing that not all of our residents speak English well or at all, and won’t engage unless they feel confident they will be understood. • Compensating participants and providing childcare services, recognizing that not everyone has the time and ability to engage meaningfully. NYCDOT Street Ambassadors tabling and meeting community members at a public event booth. Source: NYCDOT Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan52 ACTION Partner with Community-Based Organizations in equity areas and build capacity for public engagement Partnering with community-based organizations (CBOs) helps to achieve robust community participation and understanding of community needs. SLC should partner with–and pay – a diverse group of CBOs, representing a range of community interests. Planning staff and CBOs should also jointly establish clear roles, goals, and expectations for successful partnerships. Partnerships with organizations should include a commitment to build capacity. This includes training planning staff to work with CBOs and understand their unique skillsets and ensuring that CBO members have access to resources that explain planning concepts and best practices for partnering with agencies (for example, understanding procurement or how to write a proposal). Case Study: Los Angeles Metro Equity Platform & Community Based Organization Partnering Strategy (Los Angeles, CA) LA Metro (the regional transit provider in Los Angeles, CA), adopted an equity platform in 2018 to define equity for the agency and outline its approach to centering equity in internal and external processes. A key component of the platform is developing and investing in an engagement program oriented to community-based organizations (CBOs). In 2021 the agency released its CBO Partnering Strategy that includes a set of recommendations to improve LA Metro’s growing partnerships with community organizations. Best Practice Takeaways: • Create accountability and set clear and consistent parameters for partnering with CBOs. Mutually agreed upon scope of work and timeline should be revisited throughout the duration of a project. • Make room to acknowledge and address any preexisting agency-CBO tensions that may impact collaboration. • Establish an internal resource library, including sample contracting templates for CBOs. ACTION Center community input and needs in directing future investments for the Westside The Westside of SLC—segregated from the Eastside by I-15 and at- grade freight rail—has long been disproportionately impacted by inequitable transportation investment, causing long-standing frustration and distrust towards City planning processes. In 2023, SLC received a federal Reconnecting Communities grant to study options for healing the East-West divide. This is a landmark opportunity to correct and remedy past harms by practicing authentic and intentional community partnerships. Some example strategies include: • Convening focus groups with people of diverse lived experiences and personal histories. • Using visual communication and visual preference surveys over text- based information and surveys. • Allocating sufficient staff time to be responsive to community questions and concerns. 53 Local Spotlight: Salt Lake City Westside Transportation Equity Study (2021) The Westside is home to the highest concentrations of minority populations in SLC and the wider Wasatch Front region. Yet one’s transportation options and access in the Westside neighborhoods differ drastically from those in Downtown, the University of Utah, or other neighborhoods to the east of I-15. In a joint effort, SLC, UDOT, and UTA conducted the Westside Transportation Equity Study to identify strategies to engage with and invest in the historically underserved Westside neighborhoods. Some opportunities from the study include: • Improve community engagement and direct infrastructure improvements to the Westside. • Build trust in engagement processes. 48% of residents in Districts 1 and 2 (Westside) are Latinx, but only comprised 7% of respondents to past project surveys. • Involve the community in actual design processes to improve public confidence in future investments. Opportunities for community co- creation of ideas, projects, and programs hold the most promise for meaningful change and relationship building. Examples of this include bus stop design workshops that took place in the Rose Park neighborhood, where local CBOs worked hand-in-hand with agency staff. Community members and city staff paint road surfacing as part of a community workshop. Source: Salt Lake City Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan54 Strategy 1.2: Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation Weave community members’ participation into the process to collaboratively develop solutions with planning staff. ACTION Give communities agency in planning contexts and empower neighborhood voices in leading outreach efforts A proactive and inclusive approach to community engagement creates opportunities for co-creation. This strategy empowers both government and the public to collaborate in decision-making, jointly designing, planning, and executing project work. A key component of co-creation is centering events designed and led by residents, including bike rides, walk audits, charrettes, and healing spaces. These events cement residents’ ownership of the narrative surrounding their communities and the changes they wish to see. City staff should be trained to support and empower local voices to lead in these contexts. ACTION Establish a compensation program for direct payment to citizen and community organization participants Community-based organizations and residents bring valuable time and irreplicable insight to the planning table and should be compensated for their work. Compensation for community member participation is becoming a standard practice nationally, but procurement and contracting procedures can add complicated barriers. SLC should establish clear internal practices around compensation. Partnering with umbrella organizations will help to ensure that organizations and community members are paid fairly and with ease. 55 Case Study: LADOT Vision Zero dignity-infused community engagement strategy (Los Angeles, CA) LADOT’s Vision Zero Dignity-Infused Community Engagement model takes an expansive and restorative approach to engagement. The model seeks to atone for the negative impacts of past planning practices and to incorporate a wide range of lived experience and perspective in the technical planning process. A Vision Zero project on LA’s Avalon Boulevard created an inclusive experience for residents by training them as street team leaders, working with local street vendors to spread awareness and increase participation in neighborhood Vision Zero events, and providing support for community led bike rides. Best Practice Takeaways: • Partner with local CBO to stand up a street team that created employment opportunities for residents along the project corridor. • Meet with local street vendors and residents to disseminate project information in culturally relevant ways. • Build capacity for residents to lead engagement by hosting bi-weekly trainings. • Collaborate with neighborhood residents to create culturally relevant programming. LADOT Livable Streets South LA Vision Zero Community Healing Space. Source: LADOT and VisionZeroLA Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan56 Strategy 1.3: Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City, the local community and other regional partners Rebuild community trust by establishing a forum for lasting conversations. ACTION Establish embedded community focus groups or advisory panels The establishment of standing equity cabinets or working groups will help elevate issues and perspectives lived by underserved populations to the planning table. ACTION Actively demonstrate the outcomes of community input Transparent communication is key to rebuilding trust between communities and planning staff. Building this transparency includes reporting back to community members after engagement to make it clear that their insights were valued and thoughtfully considered. A plan for reporting on outcomes should be included at the outset. This means working with partners to determine an appropriate and feasible reporting timeline, as well as the best mechanisms for sharing decisions – e.g., through social media, a formal report, or a series of community meetings. SLC’s Civic Engagement team already makes “closing the loop” a key part of their engagement practice. ACTION Update the engagement guide with a workplan for recurring, collaborative co-creation Salt Lake City’s Civic Engagement Team currently maintains an official Engagement Guide, which documents specific tools and best practices for engagement activities. As the authoritative document on public engagement for the City, the Engagement Guide should be expanded to include a wider range of strategies as proposed in this Key Move, including long-term engagement and compensation practices. Codifying how agency staff should identify opportunities for engagement at community locations, walk shops, and other co-creation-based activities will help ensure implementation. “Improve the City’s public progress reporting to support public accountability and support transportation investments.” —Salt Lake City Staff Survey, December 2021 57 Case Study: SDOT Transportation Equity Workgroup (Seattle, WA) The Seattle Department of Transportation first convened the Transportation Equity Workgroup in April 2019 with the goal of building trust and accountability between SDOT and historically underinvested communities. The Workgroup is composed of members with expertise in community work, and affiliation with CBOs that represent populations of interest. The Workgroup serves as a steward for the Department’s Equity Framework, which seeks to level the playing field and guide equitable decision- making for transportation programs and projects across Seattle. Workgroup members serve two-year terms, with a 3-month onboarding process and commitment to two meetings per month. Members who complete on-boarding are compensated at $75 per hour for their time, up to 100 hours per year, and are required to sign a memorandum of agreement with the Department. Best Practice Takeaways: • Create standing committees that co-create with agency staff to impact official policy. • Foster capacity building and civic engagement for community members who work at the grassroots level. • Identify actionable steps for the agency to move forward with. Metrics • Dollars paid to community-based organizations and community members. • Comparison of demographic data for survey and in-person outreach events compared to city-wide demographics. • Geographical distribution of in-person events and survey responses. Source: Barbara Mendez, SDOT Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan58 Photo source: Salt Lake City 59 Zero Traffic Deaths Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all. Every member of our community is safe on our streets and has access to safe, healthy, equitable mobility. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 2 Equity: We design our transportation system to protect the most vulnerable people. Health and Safety: Traffic deaths and debilitating injuries are eliminated by 2035. Sustainability: People can choose transportation options that reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions without fear of losing their lives. Photo source: Salt Lake City Our strategies 2.1 Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan 2.2 Create safer streets Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan60 People enjoy a protected bicycle lane in SLC. Source: Salt Lake City. What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • Streets in SLC are not designed to protect people who walk, use wheelchairs, or bicycle. • High motor vehicle speeds are a major factor in people’s perception of safety. • Additional funding and partnerships are needed to implement key safety improvements. Key Stats From 2017-2020 there were 46 fatal crashes and 236 serious injury crashes in SLC, an average of 1.5 per week 95 fatal or serious injury crashes involved people walking and 30 involved someone riding a bicycle, over 40% of the total WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • In 2023, SLC announced its commitment to becoming the first Vision Zero city in Utah. A proclamation by the Mayor set a goal to achieve zero traffic fatalities and serious traffic injuries by 2035. • The Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide provides a framework for multimodal street design that considers land use context and mobility needs. • SLC staff analyze crash history when deciding where to make transportation improvements. • The City regularly implements proven safety improvements such as: –Reducing the number of travel lanes to reduce the ‘multiple- threat’ problem faced by pedestrians who have to cross multiple lanes of traffic moving in both directions –Adding center medians –Enhancing pedestrian crossings at unsignalized, signalized, and stop controlled locations 6161 Strategy 2.1: Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and awareness about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City Build a strong foundation to eliminate traffic deaths by 2035. ACTION Convene a Vision Zero working group Traffic safety is influenced by many systems, including transportation, law enforcement, land use policy, public health, technology, and communication. To reduce or eliminate traffic deaths and debilitating injuries, communities need to ensure meaningful interagency collaboration. The existing Safe Streets Task Force may be the appropriate place to continue this work; the City should address whether a broader coalition of partners is needed. The Vision Zero Working Group should meet regularly and support consistent communication, coordination, and revisions to the Action Plan over time. ACTION Embrace the Safe Systems approach to traffic safety The Safe Systems approach to preventing traffic deaths and serious injuries represents a shift from a reactive focus on individual behavior to proactively designing systems that accommodate human error. Adopting this approach often requires a culture change within agencies and in the community. Through the Vision Zero Working Group, community engagement, and other venues, policymakers, City staff, and Salt Lakers should be educated to create a culture of shared responsibility. Engaging with impacted communities People who are unhoused, older adults, and people who rely on walking are more likely to be killed or seriously injured in crashes. SLC should seek to understand who is most impacted by crashes locally and engage with community groups and advocates about potential solutions. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan62 How do the Safe Systems approach and Vision Zero work together? The Safe Systems approach is a distinct departure from the current paradigm of transportation planning. It recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to ensure those inevitable mistakes do not result in severe injuries or fatalities. Safe Systems is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries on SLC roadways. It is informed by the Safe Systems approach, recognizing that traffic deaths are preventable even if human error is not. It factors in human limitations as part of infrastructural, policy, and planning designs to make streets safe for all ages and abilities. This means that transportation designers and policymakers are expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. ACTION Analyze crash history and create a plan for action A Vision Zero Action Plan should analyze historic crash trends and input collected from the public to identify safety needs and priorities. Crash analysis should include the most recent five years of available data and answer the following questions, with a focus on crashes that result in a fatality or serious injury: • Where do crashes take place? • Who is most likely to be involved in crashes? • When do crashes occur? • Why do crashes occur? • What types of crashes are most common? The plan should lay out actionable strategies, assign responsibility, provide an estimate of budget and other resource needs, and provide a framework for monitoring outcomes. Prevent Crashes Safe System Approach Traditional Approach Improve Human Behavior Control Speeding Individuals are Responsible React Based on Crash History Prevent Death and Serious Injury Design for Human Mistakes and Limitations Reduce System Kinetic Energy Shared Responsibility Proactively Identify and Address Risks 63 Case Study: Vision Zero (Denver, CO) In 2017, Denver introduced its Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP) in its commitment to zero traffic-related deaths and serious injuries by 2030. It has five goals: Process & Collaboration, Safe Streets, Safe Speeds, Culture of Safety, and Data & Transparency. The VZAP is effective because it is supported by data for compelling communication to policy makers and the public. It also maps out a High Injury Network (HIN) with Communities of Concern (CoC) to equitably target Vision Zero actions. The VZAP is a collaboration effort between Denver and partners from multiple disciplines, including the Denver Vision Zero Coalition, Denver Health & Hospital Authority and many others. Source: Vision Zero Action Plan, City and County of Denver High Injury Network All Modes The HIN includes all types of Denver streets, but is mostly multi-lane arterials. It is comprised of the following types of streets: • 96% arterial streets • 1% collector streets • 3% local streets Source: DPW; DPD HIN: City of Denver Street HIN: State Highway DENVER VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 8 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan64 Strategy 2.2: Build and operate safer streets Implement proven strategies to make streets safer. ACTION Take advantage of federal funding opportunities With a Vision Zero Action Plan in place, SLC will be able to take advantage of funding opportunities such as the federal Safe Streets 4 All grant program to make infrastructure improvements. Wasatch Front Regional Council is developing a regional safety plan and will be a key partner for funding and implementation. ACTION Focus on high- injury corridors and intersections A large proportion of traffic deaths take place on a relatively small number of streets. SLC will see the greatest safety benefit by focusing improvements on the streets and intersections (including rail crossings) where most traffic deaths and serious injuries occur. The Federal Highway Administration collects research and provides guidance on safety measures that are effective in reducing fatalities and serious injuries. SLC should use this resource to select measures that are tailored to the types of crashes that take place at high-injury locations. ACTION Reduce vehicle speeds Higher motor vehicle speeds increase the likelihood that someone will die or suffer a life-altering injury in a crash, particularly when people walking or bicycling are involved. A driver moving at greater speed has reduced peripheral vision and must react more quickly to prevent a crash. For this reason, safe speed is one of the core elements of the safe systems approach to achieving Vision Zero. 65 Road diets reallocate the available pavement between curbs to slow speeds by reducing the number of general-purpose motor vehicle lanes, which also allows for bicycle lanes, pedestrian refuge islands, exclusive transit lanes, transit stops, or parking. Speed humps are an elongated mound in the roadway pavement surface extending across the travel way at a right angle to the traffic flow. Typically 3 inches in height and 12 feet in length, the vertical deflection causes a reduction in prevailing speed along a roadway. Chicanes are extensions of the curb arranged in an alternating pattern that require cars to oscillate between sides of a roadway. Curb extensions improve safety because they increase visibility, reduce speed of turning vehicles, encourage pedestrians to cross at designated locations, shorten the crossing distance, and prevent vehicles from parking at corners. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons combined with pedestrian and/or bicycle warning signs are used at mid-block crossings and at intersections of minor streets with major streets to enhance marked crosswalks. Bicycle signal phases provide separate control of bicycle movements at intersections. These separate phases reduce the number of conflicts between turning vehicles and bicycles traveling through the intersection. Examples of our tools for safer streets Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan66 Why speed matters Reducing vehicle speeds is not just a matter of changing the posted speed limit. The way streets are designed has a big impact on how fast people drive. Wider lanes and greater distances between intersections make people feel comfortable driving faster. Narrower lanes and streets with a diversity of uses like sidewalks, bicycle facilities, parked cars, and transit lanes and stops encourage people to slow down. Signals can also be timed to set the pace of traffic. SLC has seen success with the Livable Streets traffic calming program for neighborhood streets, but a different approach is needed for the high-speed, high- volume arterials where most traffic deaths occur. The Street Typology Design Guide and a review of City engineering design standards are tools to achieve this. Metrics • Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-injury locations). • Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc.). • Change in prevailing vehicle speeds on key corridors representing each of the City’s street typologies. 63 ft Thinking Braking 119 ft 164 ft 20 MPH 30 MPH 40 MPH 67 Great Networks for Active Mobility Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health outcomes. Active transportation is the mode of choice for shorter trips in Salt Lake City. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 3 Reliable Options: Connected walking, rolling, and bicycling networks get people to their destinations, whether they travel within their neighborhoods or across town. Health and Safety: Walkways and bikeways are designed to provide a safe, low-stress experience for all ages and abilities, including older adults, children, and people with disabilities. Sustainability: More trips are made using zero-emissions transportation modes. Photo source: Salt Lake City Our strategies 3.1 Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity 3.2 Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options 3.3 Create active spaces Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan68 What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • Crossing the street is challenging due to long blocks, wide streets, and a lack of pedestrian improvements. • People walking and bicycling are often forced to go out of their way to find a safe and comfortable route – there is a need to both improve existing facilities and create new connections. • Emerging mobility, such as shared e-scooters and e-bikes, should be explored to provide more transportation options to more people. Key Stats 166 miles of designated on-street bicycle lanes and routes, including 3 miles of protected lanes The share of Salt Lakers using active transportation to get to work has decreased, from 3.0% in 2010 to 2.7% in 2020 WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • Salt Lake City adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan in 2015, which is guiding ongoing projects such as the 9-Line Trail and 300 West reconstruction. • City staff follow guidelines for pedestrian crossing design based on the speed and width of the road. • Through the Livable Streets Program, SLC has identified 400 miles of streets for safety improvements, and planning efforts have begun for the top four priority zones, two of which are on the Westside. • In May 2022, the City Council voted to reduce neighborhood speed limits from 25 mph to 20 mph. • The City is rebuilding streets like 900 S and 2100 S to be safer and more comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists. • The Alleyway Pilot program is rejuvenating alleys for community use. 6969 What are pedestrian centers and corridors? Pedestrian centers and corridors are places where safety and comfort for people walking and rolling in wheelchairs are enhanced by applying more robust design standards and guidelines, such as wider sidewalks, pedestrian-scale lighting requirements, and crossing spacing maximums (see Crossing Guidelines Action below). • Pedestrian centers are neighborhoods and districts with a high density of residents and/or jobs and a mix of existing and planned land uses that enable short trips between homes and destinations. • Pedestrian corridors provide connections to important destinations such as schools, parks, shopping centers, and transit stops. Corridors can be designated in multiple tiers based on the roadway classification, level of demand, and land use. In 2023, SLC began construction of the 9-Line Trail that will provide an important east–west connection, linking neighborhoods, business districts, and cultural destinations. Strategy 3.1: Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity Create guidelines and networks that help people in Salt Lake City connect to key destinations safely. ACTION Designate a Pedestrian Priority Network Salt Lake City should build on the pedestrian priority corridors and neighborhood byways identified in the 2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan to designate a citywide network of pedestrian centers and corridors. Designated pedestrian centers and corridors also guide the City in the development of capital improvement projects that make infrastructure improvements where demand for walking and bicycling is greatest. The 9-Line Trail will provide an important east–west connection for people walking and biking. Source: Salt Lake City Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan70 Case Study: Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines (Denver, CO) Denver’s Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines provide guidance for installing new marked crossings at locations that do not have a traffic signal or stop sign. When deciding where to locate crossings, staff consider: the distance to the nearest existing marked crossing; the traffic volume of the street; whether the crossing will serve a school, park, or shared-use path; latent pedestrian demand; the volume of pedestrian activity in the area; and design considerations such as ability to install curb ramps and sight distance. Considering latent demand—where more people would walk and roll if conditions were safer—is an important aspect of the analysis. By looking at population and employment density and connections to destinations (including transit stops), the latent demand analysis elevates locations where people are likely to walk more after an improvement is made. The Guidelines also provide recommended treatments for crossings based on the size, speed, and volume of the roadway. Source: Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines, City and County of Denver ACTION Adopt crossing guidelines Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines are policy documents that guide City staff in determining where and how to make crossing improvements. SLC should build on the Downtown Master Plan Mid-Block Walkway Design Guide and the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide to create a citywide policy that addresses the location and design of marked crossings. The Guidelines may include: • A desired crossing spacing maximum for major corridors and centers to ensure that people do not have to go too far out of their way to find a place to cross the street (e.g., marked crossings should be no more than 800 feet apart). • A decision-making process for determining the exact location for new crossings. • A toolbox of crossing treatments for both controlled and uncontrolled crossing locations. • A standardized guide that helps determine the most appropriate pedestrian crossing designs and improvements. Guidance for locating new marked crossings and selecting the appropriate design treatments is complemented by engineering design standards for crossing elements such as pedestrian refuge islands. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER UNCONTROLLED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING GUIDELINES15 Table 4: Recommended treatment at marked crosswalks Roadway Type Vehicle ADT ≤9,000 Vehicle ADT >9,000 to 15,000 Vehicle ADT ≥15,000 ≤30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤30 mph 35 mph 40 mph 2 Lanes (1 lane in each direction) A 1 2 4 6 A 4 6 B 4 6 A 4 6 A 4 6 C 4 6 B 4 6 B 4 6 C 4 6 3 lanes with raised median / Single lane one-ways (1 lane in each direction) A 1 2 3 6 A 3 6 B 3 6 B 2 3 6 B 3 6 B 3 6 B 2 3 6 B 3 6 C 3 6 3 lanes w/o raised median (1 lane in each direction with a left-turn lane) A 1 2 3 4 6 A 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 B 3 4 6 B 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 C 3 4 6 4+ lanes with raised median (2 or more lanes in each direction) A 3 5 6 A 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 B 3 5 6 B 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 C 3 5 6 4+ lanes w/o raised median/ Multilane one-ways (2 or more lanes in each direction) A 3 4 5 6 B 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 B 3 4 5 6 B 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 C 3 4 5 6 Notes: Refer to the table instructions on the previous page for more information on how to use this table, such as when exceptions may be required or permitted. Explore geometric enhancements prior to the implementation of the treatment identified in the table. The recommendations in this table were updated based off of research summarized in the Federal Highway Administration’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations (FHWA-SA-17-072). When applying this table at an uncontrolled intersection leg on a signalized corridor, Level A may be upgraded to B with approval of the City Traffic Engineer. Level A may also be upgraded to B if a gap study reveals insufficient gaps to safely cross. Geometric Enhancements: 1. Raised Crosswalk 2. In-street pedestrian sign 3. Advanced “yield here to” markings & signage 4. Pedestrian refuge island 5. Road diet 6. Curb Extensions Level Treatment A Markings & Signing B RRFB C PHB or Signal 71 ACTION Identify the greatest needs for improving active mobility Salt Lake City should carry out a citywide assessment to determine where sidewalks and curb ramps need to be installed or improved. This assessment could help support an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transition plan, with the goal of making all sidewalks and crossings accessible for people with disabilities. To guide where improvements are made first, the City should develop a set of criteria that uses data on equity, safety, and access to destinations. Improvement projects can be organized into implementation phases based on the result of the analysis. Additional funding will likely be needed to support this work. Case Study: PedPDX Marked Crossing Guidelines (Portland, OR) PedPDX, the City of Portland’s Pedestrian Plan, establishes a desired spacing between marked pedestrian crossings. The desired spacing varies depending on the type of street and nearby land use. Areas with a higher level of pedestrian activity and demand should have marked crossings approximately every 530 feet (every other block based on Portland’s standard block length), while other major streets should have marked crossings about every 800 feet, at minimum. Transit stops should always have a marked crossing within 100 feet, regardless of street classification. Source: PedPDX Marked Crossing Guidelines, PBOT Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan72 Strategy 3.2: Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options Provide comfortable facilities for people to bike, scoot, and roll. ACTION Implement low- stress facility design Salt Lake City should continue to implement the recommended low-stress bikeway network using facility selection and design guidance from the NACTO Urban Bikeways Design Guide and develop locally-specific neighborhood byway design guidelines, including traffic calming elements and design options for major street crossings. City engineering design standards should be consistent with bike facility design best practices. ACTION Adopt an equitable shared mobility policy Salt Lake City should continue to work with private shared mobility operators to ensure bikes and scooters are deployed in neighborhoods with more low-income residents and people who depend on transit, walking, and biking. Given how quickly offerings are changing, shared mobility agreements and deployment should be reviewed frequently and adapted as new devices and new reservation and payment technologies become available. ACTION Improve work zone standards Temporary or intermittent closures due to construction make travel less safe, reliable, and convenient for people walking and bicycling. Construction that impacts the public right-of- way in SLC is required to have a traffic control plan that includes an ADA-compliant pedestrian path. Requirements for bicycle accommodation in work zones are less clear. SLC should adopt more robust standards and guidelines, putting more resources toward enforcement, and providing training on updated standards to help make sure people have a seamless travel experience during construction. Case Study: Washington DC Work Zone Policy (Washington DC) Washington DC’s Pedestrian Safety and Work Zone Standard provides preferred methods for safely routing pedestrians and bicyclists through work zones that occupy the public right-of-way. Standards for walkways in work zones include dimensions for flooring and roofs, and ensures walkways have lighting, transit access, and signage, and are ADA compliant. Prioritization of preferred methods for pedestrian protection are based on phase of construction, and generally prioritize the method that is most convenient for pedestrians to use. The standards describe how pedestrian accommodations around work zones may impact the bicycle right-of-way and should be considered in traffic control plans. Training is an essential part of implementing these standards in a traffic control plan.73 Case Study: Los Angeles People St Program (Los Angeles, CA) The Los Angeles People St Program transforms streets into public spaces. The program was created in collaboration with the City of Los Angeles departments of Public Works and City Planning, the Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti, and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). Community groups apply to participate and work with LADOT to design their own projects, choosing from a menu of low-cost materials to create plazas, parklets, and bicycle corrals. Non-profits, business improvement districts, and groups of property owners are examples of eligible community partners. Community partners are responsible for the installation, operation, management, and maintenance of parklets. Projects are permitted for one year with the option to renew the permit. A new parklet with herbs and community garden plots installed on Motor Avenue in Los Angeles, as part of the People St program. Source: LADOT Livable Streets Strategy 3.3: Create active spaces Bring our streets to life through street programs and activated alleyways. ACTION Create slow, shared, and car-free streets Salt Lake City should expand the Livable Streets Program to identify candidates for shared curbless or car-free street design and add appropriate design features to the Livable Streets Toolkit. Features could include low-cost, easy-to- implement materials like paint, benches, and planters. Streets should be prioritized based on the City’s equity goals and community input. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan74 ACTION Activate alleys The Alleyway Pilot Program partners with neighbors and community councils to improve and maintain alleys. SLC should identify long-term funding to make the program permanent and consider including it as part of an expanded Livable Streets Program. Candidate locations for improvements could be identified in two categories: alleys with potential to be better connections for people walking and bicycling, and alleys with potential to be redesigned as public space. Pursuing and supporting partnerships with neighborhood-based groups to implement and maintain alleys will be crucial to success. Prioritization criteria should be established, and funding sources identified that align with the functional objectives of a specific alley project (for instance, a green alley could be funded through stormwater management funds whereas active alleys for pedestrians and bicyclists could be funded by non-motorized transportation grants or capital funds). Metrics • Change in walking and bicycling mode share. • Number of new or enhanced pedestrian crossings. • Change in access to all-ages-and-abilities bicycle facilities (e.g., population within ¼ mile). 75 Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City. To face the environmental and mobility challenges of the next 20 years, SLC will support the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) in promoting a safe, reliable, and convenient transit experience. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 4 Photo source: Salt Lake City Our strategies 4.1 Make transit convenient and reliable 4.2 Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces 4.3 Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option Sustainability: Public transit is the preferred way to travel to school and work. Health and Safety: All people can reliably and affordably get where they need to go by transit. Sustainability: Station areas are lively urban spaces, designed for people and the communities they belong to. Reliable Options: People can depend on transit, and the experience of transferring between modes of travel is seamless, safe, and convenient. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan76 What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • Negative perceptions of public transit remain the largest barrier to transit use. Safety, convenience, and reliability of service need to be improved. • Longer distance commutes and trips into SLC with multiple transfers are difficult to navigate. • More attractive, inviting urban spaces near transit are needed to support transit ridership. Key stats 5% of commuters in SLC travel by public transit (US Census, 2021 ACS) Only 17% of existing bus stops in SLC have a bench or shelter 33% of UTA survey respondents live near TRAX stations, but a third of them don’t take transit 32% of UTA survey respondents say “inconvenience” is their biggest barrier to riding transit WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • Salt Lake City adopted a Transit Master Plan in 2017, which presents a blueprint for addressing some of the community’s greatest concerns around transit. • The Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) is updating its 2023-2050 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which identifies inter-county connectivity and air quality as major transportation priorities. The previous RTP (2019) set aside $5.3 billion for transit- related investments over the next 27 years. • Utah Transit Authority (UTA) is in the process of updating its 30-year Long-Range Transit Plan (LRTP), which will assess the long-term needs and implementation strategies for systemwide improvements. • Community led initiatives such as the Rio Grande Plan reflect public desire for transformative transit-oriented spaces. • Other projects such as the Future of Light Rail Study and the development of high-capacity transit corridors across SLC are underway. 77 Speed and reliability investments make transit faster • San Francisco, CA: dedicated bus lanes have reduced travel times on local buses by up to 32%. Source: SFMTA Van Ness Blvd project website • Austin, TX: new half-mile bus lane reduced PM peak travel time by 52% across 6 bus routes. Source: CapMetro Streets for Transit Report Strategy 4.1: Make transit convenient and reliable Support UTA in making transit a viable and competitive alternative to driving by investing in transit-priority streets. ACTION Institutionalize the SLC and UTA partnership with a joint taskforce on advancing transit SLC and UTA priorities are deeply intertwined. Going beyond an interlocal agreement, a bilateral taskforce can take initiative to establish a transit-centered vision for the city where plans can be accelerated and processes can be coordinated. ACTION Expand the City’s bus lane and transit signal priority (TSP) network Across North America, transit priority treatments such as dedicated bus lanes and optimized and prioritized traffic signals have proven to be effective at reducing travel times on transit. The speed and on-time reliability of transit are significant factors that influence a person’s travel decisions. Investing in transit priority corridors will help make transit more competitive with driving. SLC can play an innovative role in helping deliver the Frequent Transit Network identified in the SLC Transit Master Plan. “Work with UTA so that TRAX doesn’t have to stop at every intersection. That really slows it down and makes it somewhat frustrating to ride.” —Connect SLC community input Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan78 Down t o w n . . . 3 m i n Down t o w n . . . 6 m i n A bus-only lane in downtown saves the bus time and keeps it running on schedule... ...which means the bus saves time along the entire route. People outside of downtown benefit from an on-time departure too. As transit travel times become more competitive with driving, more people take the bus, relieving traffic congestion and improving air quality citywide. Who benefits from transit priority investments? Source: Nelson\Nygaard ACTION Explore regional transit connections and fill gaps in the external and intercity travel market As the region’s largest urban center, 83% of people employed in SLC commute from outside the city limits on a regular basis. Given the prevalence of these trips, improving the quality of regional transit connections and exploring opportunities for intercity bus services will ensure critical connections are served and regional auto travel is reduced. 79 Strategy 4.2: Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces Design transit spaces and experiences that are comfortable, accessible, and human-centered. ACTION Expand SLC’s Downtown Ambassadors program to support and staff transit facilities Since its inception in 2018, the SLC Downtown Street Ambassadors program has been successful in supporting local residents and businesses as a community safety and wayfinding resource. Ambassadors provide directions, coordinate resources with local agencies, and serve as visible faces of the community. Expanding the program and meeting the needs of transit riders can help alleviate ongoing concerns over safety at bus stops and station areas. Local Spotlight: Salt Lake City Downtown Ambassador Program “In 2020, Downtown Ambassadors performed 6,591 wellness checks on individuals in the downtown area, referred 1,448 individuals to shelter and services, and responded 2,859 times to merchants who needed assistance.” —SLC City Blog While UTA is in the process of procuring transit ambassadors for TRAX light rail, coordinating resources between the City and transit agency can provide better coverage and support to riders waiting for buses and trains, and otherwise interacting with transit spaces. Source: Downtown AllianceConnect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan80 ACTION Harness technology to modernize major transit facilities and waiting areas Real-time bus information screens can help alleviate uncertainty and provide accessible information to those without access to an online smartphone app. Solar powered e-paper displays are being trialed across the world as the energy-efficient, all-weather readable solution to expensive LED screens. Major transit facilities such as rail stations and mobility hubs can benefit from interactive kiosks, electric charging stations, digital bike lockers, and bikeshare stations to maximize convenience. Example elements of a major transit facilityACTION Work with UTA to upgrade bus stops in SLC with passenger amenities Bus stop amenities are not only investments for transit riders. Shelters, benches, street lighting, greenery, and wayfinding signage help to liven the streetscape and public space for everyone. Transit riders depend on a comfortable place to wait and plan their trips, and citywide upgrades at major transit stops can help make riding transit a valued way of life. Stops and stations are the access points where people enter, exit, and interact with the transit system. First impressions matter. “Upgrade transit facilities—bus stop shelters would be nice.” —Connect SLC community input Dow n t o w n . . . 3 m i n Dow n t o w n . . . 6 m i n Real-time information Bikeshare services i 123>> Secure bike storage Wayfinding and mobile ticketing Carshare 81 Strategy 4.3: Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option Tailor the surrounding urban environment to incentivize transit development and usage. ACTION Establish multimodal mobility hubs in local areas of importance and future growth Mobility hubs put people first, emphasizing comfort and safety for riders to transfer between modes of travel. Amenities such as secure bike lockers, e-scooters, and bike share stations make transit more attractive when first- and last-mile trips are more convenient to make. Furthermore, upgrading transit centers and park-and-rides across SLC would be a great first step in reducing car dependency. UDOT currently manages a mobility hub program which falls under the agency’s transportation demand management (TDM) efforts. The City can partner with UDOT and UTA to tailor mobility hub solutions within city limits, targeting land uses and developments that are ideal for a density of transportation options. Case Study: Eastgate Mobility Hub (Bellevue, WA) The Eastgate Mobility Hub 2025 is a conceptual vision formed from partnerships between King County Metro, the City of Bellevue, Washington Department of Transportation, Sound Transit, and other Eastgate stakeholders. The Eastgate Mobility Hub vision transforms Eastgate Park- and-Ride into an integrated mobility hub connecting nearby employees, students, and passengers with transportation options. In addition to a park- and-ride, the space would host a variety of travel options such as carpool, carshare, bike parking and a micromobility hub. The conceptual pedestrian plaza would have weather protection and public art installation, offering placemaking opportunities that create an enjoyable user experience. Source: Eastgate Mobility Hub Vision, King County Metro Bellevue Mercer Island Seattle Newcastle Clyde Hill Yarrow Point Hunts Point 90 90 5 405 EastgatePark-and-RideEastgatePark-and-Ride Next B u s . . . 3 m i n Next B u s . . . 6 m i n PARK I N G PAvaila b l e : 8 8 Occup i e d : 4 1 2 EASTGATE MOBILITY HUB VISION 2025 This brochure outlines a conceptual vision for the transformation of the Eastgate Park-and-Ride facility into a regional mobility hub by the year 2025. The Eastgate Mobility Hub 2025 Phase I project is a partnership between King County Metro, the City of Bellevue, and Eastgate stakeholders including WSDOT and Sound Transit. These partners share a vision of transforming the Eastgate Park- and-Ride into an integrated mobility hub with a broad range of first- and last-mile access and transportation options and amenities that support fixed route transit investments. These improvements will be leveraged by enhanced information, customer facilities, and managed parking. The Eastgate Park-and-Ride facility is a dynamic site, with: • 17 local and regional express bus routes, as well as public and private shuttles; • A five-story parking garage and surface parking lots providing 1,614 parking stalls for transit riders connecting from farther away; • Nearby Bellevue College, with an annual enrollment of nearly 30,000 students and 1,500 employees; • Major employers and human service providers in the greater Eastgate area; and • Extensive bus inrastructure, including center access ramps, layover spaces, and electric bus charging capability. Ongoing and future transportation improvements in the area include regional bike paths, expansion of the local bike lane network, introduction of RapidRide bus rapid transit service, and Link light rail service. The design concepts outlined in this brochure are the result of a year-long partnership between King County Metro, the City of Bellevue, and Eastgate stakeholders. This work was guided by stakeholder interviews and the results of an all- day design workshop held in December 2018 with agency representatives, community members, area employers, project consultants, and mobility service providers. Eastgate Park-and-Ride is owned by WSDOT and operated by King County Metro Transit, resulting in some limitations on activities allowed on the property. Legislative action may be required to deliver some elements of the vision described in this document. CONTENTS What is a Mobility Hub? 2 Site Plan and Features 3 Conceptual Rendering 5 Mobility Hub Benefits 7 Implementation Strategy 11 Mobility hubs are active spaces where a variety of multimodal transportation options, information resources, placemaking features, and traveler amenities converge in a well-designed, publicly accessible space to support a variety of different types of trips. Mobility hubs are more than just transit stations or park- and-rides—mobility hubs are safe, comfortable, convenient, accessible places to connect smoothly and easily between transit service and other travel modes. A successful mobility hub design should not only organize the space but also prioritize the needs of different people based on the vision, mission, and objectives of the local community and transportation agencies. Mobility hubs provide an excellent platform for supporting more equitable access to transportation options, and for advancing new public and private mobility services and partnerships. They are important points of entry into the regional public transportation network for many travelers, providing a valuable opportunity to create an enjoyable user experience and build a strong relationship between the community and transportation providers. WHAT IS A MOBILITY HUB? 1 2 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan82 ACTION Improve access- to-transit infrastructure to complete the city’s street network For transit to be effective, SLC residents must feel safe and comfortable accessing transit stops and stations from where they live and work. Completing sidewalks and implementing protected bicycle infrastructure and high visibility street crossings around station areas will connect people to transit and make first-/last-mile connections more seamless. Asset inventory of right-of-way infrastructure should include its proximity and utility to transit. ACTION Use Small Area and Circulation plans to encourage dense development around station areas The effectiveness of public transit is constrained or enhanced by the land uses surrounding it, and transit-oriented development (TOD) facilitates easy access to jobs and services by concentrating people and employment near major bus and rail facilities. Small Area Plans, Circulation Plans, and Station Area Plans are valuable planning tools that can design a vision for communities that are served by high-capacity transit, tailoring development priorities and uses to the needs of each context. SLC can also further coordinate development review processes to better serve the potential of TOD around station areas. Metrics • Change in transit mode share. • Number of TSP and bus lane treatments installed per year. • Change in travel time for commuters traveling into SLC. • Percentage of stops in SLC upgraded with amenities. • Transit rider satisfaction survey results. “Support bus journeys by increasing frequency and providing comfortable pathways to and from bus stops.” —Community input 83 Healing the East-West Divide Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside neighborhoods. Salt Lake City provides safe, clear, and dignified linkages and culturally relevant public spaces designed with and for communities who have been most harmed and disadvantaged by past infrastructure. Everyone has access to attainable housing options and essential goods and services using connected networks that promote walking, rolling, bicycling, and transit ridership. Supporting our values Our strategies 5.1 Develop a community-driven east–west transportation strategy 5.2 Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks 5.3 Reclaim spaces to serve community and function at a human scale 5.4 Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods where prosperity is shared Sustainability: Westside neighborhoods have access to sustainable transportation options that help improve air quality. Equity: Transportation improvements are prioritized in areas most in need; policy development, planning, and design efforts center the voices, experiences, and desires of SLC’s Westside residents, BIPOC communities, and others who have been harmed or marginalized by transportation investments. Affordability: Affordable transportation options are available for those who need them. Health and Safety: Our transportation system provides equal opportunity for safety, health, and overall quality of life for Westside residents. Reliable Options: People living on the Westside can connect easily to neighborhoods throughout SLC. KEY MOVE 5 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan84 What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • The Westside is a historically redlined area of the city where residents were more likely to be denied mortgages to secure homeownership and build general wealth. • People living in Westside neighborhoods feel disconnected from Downtown SLC and the Eastside neighborhoods. • People don’t feel safe crossing the east–west divide. People walking and bicycling are exposed to unsafe travel conditions, highway ramps, and unwelcoming environments. • Significant street and public space investments are needed to close gaps caused by I-15, the Union Pacific railroad tracks, I-215, and S.R 201. • There is a lack of trust in local government from years of feeling unheard during major transportation decisions that have divided community members from the rest of the city. • People who live in Westside neighborhoods feel anxiety about being displaced by new residents with higher incomes who are being attracted to the area by increased market-rate housing development and public investments in bike lanes and transit station improvements. These experiences are reflected by the physical extent and pervasiveness of the infrastructure that creates them. WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • Recognizing our history: The 2020 Westside Transportation Equity Study identifies the lack of transportation equity in SLC’s Westside neighborhoods. Identifying and documenting historic harm and current inequity in our transportation system is one small step in progressing toward a more just city. • Making investments: Salt Lake City and the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) launched UTA On Demand service on the Westside to provide transportation to neighborhoods that lack fixed transit routes. New Westside routes have been implemented as of August 2022 that are part of the Frequent Transit Network and include upgrades to bus stops, making them more accessible to transit riders of all ages and abilities. • Planning a connected future: The US DOT launched a first-ever program – the Reconnecting Communities Pilot—to reconnect communities that are cut off from opportunity and burdened by past transportation infrastructure decisions. In 2023, SLC was successful in obtaining a $1.9M federal planning grant to continue to work with community partners to heal the City’s east–west divide. • Critical Connections: While not yet in process at the time of this plan, the work from the Reconnecting Communities grant should create design-level solutions to the east-west divide co-created with the community. 8585 Redlining map of Salt Lake City (ca. 1933–1939). Source: National Archives Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan86 Divided through history Historic transportation investments bifurcate SLC and perpetuate socio-economic inequities, threaten community cohesion, and are a cause of environmental injustice. The time has come to reverse the community harm caused by these investments and SLC is pursuing this end. To do so, it is important to understand how we arrived at this place. Bold and human-centric decisions, made with the historic context of past harms in mind, will be needed to change the march of history, which has placed economic gain and mechanization over community, safety, and well-being. A spur of the Transcontinental Railroad was constructed, setting a rail pathway that is in place today. Rapid railway expansion supported industrial growth; by 1910, there were three parallel railroad tracks running in the pathway of Third West. I-15 was constructed, removing several blocks of historic gridded neighborhood streets, homes, and businesses in SLC. UDOT evaluated options to further widen I-15 from 400 South in SLC to Farmington. “Good health and connected communities” are among the project’s purpose and need statements. History shows that freeway expansions in urban areas benefit those traveling through and from suburban communities at the expense of residents who chose or are forced to live close to the freeway envelope. SLC’s original 660-foot square blocks were platted and built emanating from Temple Square after white settlers arrived. Industry takes hold and locates along the Jordan River, polluting it with industrial waste. Redlining maps were drawn, marking Westside neighborhoods undesirable for federally-backed mortgages compared to Eastside neighborhoods. I-15 was expanded, including rebuilding many interchanges and creating many of the current long, auto-centric viaducts that connect east to west across the freeway and railroad tracks. Late 1800s1850s–1860s 1939 1997–2001 Late 1870s 1880s–1920 1960s–1970s 2023 The lands of the Salt Lake Valley are the ancestral home of and an important gathering place for the Ute, Paiute, Goshute, Dine’/Navajo, and Shoshoni people. 87 Residents’ view on the divide The Connect SLC project team met members of the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and walked areas around I-15 and the railroad lines. The team conducted interviews with organizations who serve communities in need and people and communities affected by freeway and railroad corridors. The community identified three key challenges: Significant investment is needed to close gaps and provide more public space. Embed equity to produce community- first outcomes. Multiple agencies must coordinate to address infrastructure issues. Invest in safe and efficient pathways for people. Local government must center the voices of community members to build trust. Retrofit streets and transit facilities to offer dignified and welcoming experiences. Incentivize the development of complete, transit-oriented neighborhoods. From this process, four key opportunities emerged: 1 2 3 4 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan88 The Westside is home to 36% of SLC residents.36% Source: US Census ACS 2018 5-Year Estimates (2014-2018) Source: Environmental Justice Screening Tool, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Source: Fatality and Serious Injury Data, Utah Department of Transportation Zero Fatalities Source: US Census ACS 2018 5-Year Estimates (2014- 2018) Key stats of fatal crashes in SLC take place on the Westside. 77%����� The Westside is younger and more racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse than Salt Lake City as a whole. 55.1% are non-white, non-Hispanic (34.6% citywide). 25.8% living below the poverty level (17.9% citywide). 30.7% are under 18 years old (19.6% citywide). 22.7% are persons with disabilities (10.5% citywide). Neighborhoods adjacent to I-15 and I-215 are exposed to more air pollution than the rest of Salt Lake City. When compared to nationwide pollution rates, Westside census tracts rank in the 80th percentile or above for diesel particulate matter and ozone and have a high risk of cancer and asthma. 80thpercentile 89 POPLAR GROVE FAIRPARK BALLPARK EASTSIDE WESTSIDE DOWNTOWN SLC ROSE PARK EAST CENTRAL GLENDALE 300 N N Temple St 1000 W 400 SRedwood Rd 900 W 1800 N 900 S 2100 S 600 N 200 S 800 S 1300 S 1700 S Railyard Utah State Fairgrounds University of Utah State Capitol Salt Lake Central Station Liberty Park Jordan Park Jordan River Trail Jordan River Trail 9-Line Trail South of the railyard, there are more than 30 locations where the street grid is disconnected due to I-15 and the railroad tracks. At-grade railroad crossings are active hundreds of times a day, with no published schedule for when freight trains pass through. This causes significant travel delays for everyone who travels on these corridors. Most through-streets are auto-centric with high traffic volumes and speeds. People walking and bicycling have only two low-stress options. Six of the 11 east-west through-streets are high-crash corridors.At-grade railroad crossing High collision corridor Disconnected street Auto-centric corridor Frequent transit corridor Low-stress walking and bicycling corridor Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan90 POPLAR GROVE FAIRPARK BALLPARK EASTSIDE WESTSIDE DOWNTOWN SLC ROSE PARK EAST CENTRAL GLENDALE 300 N N Temple St 1000 W 400 SRedwood Rd 900 W 1800 N 900 S 2100 S 600 N 200 S 800 S 1300 S 1700 S Railyard Utah State Fairgrounds University of Utah State Capitol Salt Lake Central Station Liberty Park Jordan Park Jordan River Trail Jordan River Trail 9-Line Trail South of the railyard, there are more than 30 locations where the street grid is disconnected due to I-15 and the railroad tracks. At-grade railroad crossings are active hundreds of times a day, with no published schedule for when freight trains pass through. This causes significant travel delays for everyone who travels on these corridors. Most through-streets are auto-centric with high traffic volumes and speeds. People walking and bicycling have only two low-stress options. Six of the 11 east-west through-streets are high-crash corridors.At-grade railroad crossing High collision corridor Disconnected street Auto-centric corridor Frequent transit corridor Low-stress walking and bicycling corridor Existing challenges tobthebeastȂwest divide 91 Strategy 5.1: Develop a community-driven East-West Transportation Strategy Improve safe east–west connections to knit the city together. ACTION Elevate voices of communities on the Westside and those most impacted by transportation infrastructure The Westside Transportation Equity Study and ongoing efforts reveal the economic impacts and social and environmental harms from I-15 and railroad expansion. SLC has an opportunity to gather as a community, elevate voices, and join in a process of co-creation to break down barriers and create a better city for generations to come. With City funding dedicated to solving east–west connectivity problems and a grant from the USDOT, SLC is positioned to tackle these problems in a manner that centers equity and the experience of those harmed by previous transportation infrastructure investments. A process that centers equity and human voices will require new structures for planning and community co-creation. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan92 Case Study: Reconnecting South Park (Seattle, WA) Reconnecting South Park is a community-led, community-centered effort to rethink, remove, and/or repurpose a segment of State Route 99 in Seattle, WA. This segment of highway divides one of Seattle’s most diverse, impoverished, and environmentally impacted neighborhoods. The City of Seattle hired a group of neighborhood-based organizations active in South Park to lead the community visioning effort. A technical team will support urban design, housing, transportation analysis and engineering, and equitable development, but local community-based organizations are leading the vision. The process is structured to shift power to community members and organizations and embrace a process of co-creation with government, advocate, and community partners. Source: Nelson\Nygaard 93 ACTION Center human safety, health, and experience The east–west divide plays a pervasive role in dictating cultural, racial, economic, and psychological outcomes for SLC residents. The Connect SLC vision is for a city in which living east or west of the “divide” has no impact on one’s education, safety, daily routine, or economic stability. Safety Short-term and long-term strategies and projects to improve safety are needed and can provide opportunities to make crossings more welcoming and comfortable, especially for people walking or bicycling. Health Numerous environmental health reports show significantly elevated cardiovascular mortality risk, lung cancer, and childhood asthma for people living near heavily traveled freeways. Gaseous and particulate pollutants emitted by fossil fuel-burning vehicles have negative health impacts and have been shown to cause disease and poor health outcomes. Wind directions, wind speed, time of day (level of traffic), and other factors all affect risk of exposure. A 2019 study showed that children living near a highway experienced development delays at two times the national average. Diesel-powered trains also produce high levels of dangerous air pollutants, making the combination of busy mainline rail lines, rail switching yards, and an interstate highway a community health hazard. Source: Salt Lake City ““A 2019 study showed that children living near a highway experienced development delays at two times the national average.15 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan94 As SLC and its partners at UDOT and in the development community build and redesign spaces around the freeway, there are many tactics that can help to reduce impacts. Transportation • Vehicle electrification • Train electrification • Travel options and reduction in driving • High use of transit • Infrastructure improvements such as filtration systems, sound walls, etc. • Decking over or tunneling freeways or rail tracks Urban design and development • Landscaping barriers • Land use buffers • Tree planting • Urban design treatments that protect people from wind patterns • Smart location of parks and public spaces • Building siting and design that affects wind patterns User Experience Changing the mentality of crossing under a highway is a tall order. Infrastructure designed to move thousands of vehicles is difficult to bring to a human scale, but many cities have tried with great success. Many of the most successful examples use spaces adjacent to streets to create activated public spaces. These spaces also require active programming, security, and lighting to succeed over the long term. This graphic from the report Improving Health in Communities Near Highways illustrates how smart development can help shield people in public spaces from airborne particulates. Source: Community Assessment of Freeway Exposure and Health, Tufts University Case Study: Underpass Park (Toronto, ON) Toronto’s Underpass Park is a great example of a radical transformation of space under an urban freeway that is well used by community members. Community-based programming that delivers public amenities desired by the community and appropriate for the location is essential. Part of Toronto’s Underpass Park includes basketball courts and a skate park next to the concrete support columns. Source: Waterfront Toronto 95 Cafe HARDWARE CLINIC GROCERIES A P T S PHARMACYSTORE DOWNTOWN RESTAURANT P SAFE AND DIGNIFIED LINKAGES ENHANCED PUBLIC TRANSIT HUMAN SCALE INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SPACE ACTION Craft a community-centric East-West Transportation Strategy that addresses immediate needs and inspires bold action People who travel across and near freeway and railroad corridors in SLC experience both physical and psychological barriers to access destinations like jobs, education, health care, and grocery stores. Safety and travel time challenges have long been documented for Westside communities. The city and its partners should mitigate these barriers by designing, planning, and managing city assets, curbs, streets, and infrastructure to prioritize the safe and efficient movement of people, especially those who are most underserved and marginalized. An East- West Transportation Strategy will identify community-derived strategies that improve access to jobs and services, reduce travel time, make travel more reliable, and solve longstanding safety challenges. Bold work to rethink how urban freeways and rail infrastructure impact our communities is gaining traction across the United States. However, these efforts remain small and often on the fringe compared to the multibillion-dollar industries that power freeway expansion. Critical efforts to reduce reliance on vehicular mobility require community- driven leadership, bold thinking, and realistic and sequenced implementation programs. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan96 Cafe HARDWARE CLINIC GROCERIES A P T S PHARMACYSTORE DOWNTOWN RESTAURANT PEQUITABLE MOBILITY OPTIONS EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY CO-CREATION BEYOND ENGAGEMENT PILOTS AND EARLY ACTION PROGRAMS 97 Strategy 5.2: Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks Create safe and reliable linkages between Eastside and Westside neighborhoods. ACTION Develop fast implementation projects that stitch the east–west divide Short-term enhancements help improve the travel time and experience for people living in Westside neighborhoods. These improvements can help to save lives and make crossing safer while larger infrastructure solutions are developed and implemented. These opportunities should focus on the mobility needs of communities experiencing poor safety outcomes and having the greatest needs according to the UDOT Healthy Places Index. Strategies to improve at-grade rail crossings: • Improve sidewalks and provide curb ramps on all streets leading to at-grade rail crossings. • Channelize space for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians as they approach a crossing gate (e.g., a fixed median with flexible bollard can prevent people from trying to drive under a descending gate). • Add hinged pedestrian gate skirts at all at-grade pedestrian rail crossings. • Examine feasibility of installing Accessible Pedestrian Signals at all at-grade rail crossings. • Improve crossing surfaces where people cross rail tracks at-grade. • Increase warning time for pedestrians and bicyclists at rail crossings. • Keep all paint lines and markings fresh and visible (use “Keep Clear” paint markings in track zone). Pedestrian Gate Skirts The use of a technology called a Hinged Pedestrian Gate Skirt is effective at reducing risk factors for at-grade pedestrian rail crossings. Combined with enhanced sidewalk infrastructure, the addition of these pedestrian- focused drop arms helps improve safety outcomes. Hinged Pedestrian Gate Skirts reduce safety concerns for at grade pedestrian rail crossings. Source: USDOTConnect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan98 ACTION Develop bold concepts to repair and build community The impact of the infrastructure that divides the city is both physical and psychological. The sheer size of highway viaducts, looming overpasses, and freight tracks shape a hostile landscape that is, at best, intimidating to people walking and bicycling. People in the Westside neighborhoods feel acutely the sense of disconnection and exclusion from the full offerings of the city. Salt Lake City should also pursue continued investment in pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly under or overpasses that provide seamless connections and community gathering spaces. These represent larger capital projects and take longer to plan and implement, but a series of grade-separated crossings like the 300 North Bridge can be delivered much more rapidly than major infrastructure projects that require changes to mainline rail tracks or the highway. 300 North Bridge Under Construction (2023). Source: Salt Lake City “Many times, I feel boxed in on this side of town. It is very common for me to be blocked by a train when I am commuting by bicycle to the granary, Central Ninth, Ball Park, or downtown areas.” —Connect SLC community input 99 New multi-use trails, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, and enhancements to existing biking and walking facilities provide more comfortable options for vulnerable travelers. New Complete Street connections give everyone more options for traveling to and from the Westside. Many existing through-streets are connected to freeway ramps. Creating new street connections provides a safer experience with lower traffic speeds. Mobility Hubs bring different travel options together. This includes transit service, shared mobility, and improved connections for people walking and bicycling. Modernized interchanges and reconfigured highway access ramps improve safety for all modes, create new connections, and open up land for development and public space. E M E R G E N C Y Railyard Utah State Fairgrounds University of Utah State Capitol Salt Lake Central Station Liberty Park Jordan Park POPLAR GROVE FAIRPARK BALLPARK DOWNTOWN SLC ROSE PARK EAST CENTRAL GLENDALE Jordan River Trail FAIRPARK BALLPARK DOWNTOWN SLC EAST CENTRAL300 N N Temple St 900 W 400 S 1800 N 2100 S 600 N 200 S 1300 S 1700 S Jordan River Trail 9-Line Trail Modernized interchange New complete street connection New grade-separated trail connection Added protection for walking and bicycling Mobility hub Frequent transit corridor Potential I-15 cap and train box EASTSIDE WESTSIDE Opportunities to heal the east–west divide Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan100 New multi-use trails, a bicycle and pedestrian bridge, and enhancements to existing biking and walking facilities provide more comfortable options for vulnerable travelers. New Complete Street connections give everyone more options for traveling to and from the Westside. Many existing through-streets are connected to freeway ramps. Creating new street connections provides a safer experience with lower traffic speeds. Mobility Hubs bring different travel options together. This includes transit service, shared mobility, and improved connections for people walking and bicycling. Modernized interchanges and reconfigured highway access ramps improve safety for all modes, create new connections, and open up land for development and public space. E M E R G E N C Y Railyard Utah State Fairgrounds University of Utah State Capitol Salt Lake Central Station Liberty Park Jordan Park POPLAR GROVE FAIRPARK BALLPARK DOWNTOWN SLC ROSE PARK EAST CENTRAL GLENDALE Jordan River Trail FAIRPARK BALLPARK DOWNTOWN SLC EAST CENTRAL300 N N Temple St 900 W 400 S 1800 N 2100 S 600 N 200 S 1300 S 1700 S Jordan River Trail 9-Line Trail Modernized interchange New complete street connection New grade-separated trail connection Added protection for walking and bicycling Mobility hub Frequent transit corridor Potential I-15 cap and train box EASTSIDE WESTSIDE 101 Big ideas to heal the east–west divide The scope and scale of the infrastructure that divides us dictates the need for equally big moves to reconnect our neighborhoods. BIG IDEA Bury I-15 I-15 bisects SLC, looming above the street grade and creating a physical and psychological barrier. What is it? • Replace the aging I-15 viaduct with a cut- and-cover tunnel in Central Salt Lake City • Extent could stretch from north of 600 N to south of Ballpark • Create acres of space for housing, commercial uses, public services, parks, and public space Inspiration: The replacement of the State Route 99 Viaduct in Seattle with a new highway tunnel has created a generational opportunity to reconnect people with the City’s waterfront. Source: Waterfront Seattle Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan102 Inspiration: Cap atop the Reno train trench. Source: Downtown Reno Partnership Seattle’s Lid I-5 Study determined that lidding the below-grade sections of the freeway could add 10 acres of public park and 4,500 new housing units, reconnect historic grid streets, and help reduce noise and pollution. Source: WSP/City of Seattle BIG IDEA Trench the train Mainline rail tracks are the most disruptive feature of SLC’s transportation system and the number one cause of poor reliability for travelers. What is it? • Build a train trench along 500 W • A community vision includes restoration of the Rio Grande Depot to serve as the main passenger rail and transit hub • Create acres of space for housing, commercial uses, public services, parks, and public space BIG IDEA Reconsider freeway ramps I-15 ramp connections to the city are some of the most dangerous places for travelers of all modes and impact development opportunity. What is it? • Reconstruct the 600 N interchange to be a safe and viable east- to-west crossing for all modes • Rebuild 500 S and 600 S to reduce intrusion and impact on the city • Reconsider the 500 S / 600 S interchange to reconnect the street grid over/under the highway and tracks while providing urban- scale freeway access • Remove the 900 S ramp to open land for public uses and development in the Ballpark/Central 9th neighborhood where the ramps consume 8+ acres 103 Source: Google Streetview Inspiration: View of the entrance to a proposed pedestrian crossing of mainline rail tracks from integrated development at Sacramento Valley Station in California. Source: Perkins & Will BIG IDEA Break the berm South of 900 S I-15 is constructed largely on a raised berm with very few places to cross through or over. What is it? • Add multimodal crossings between 900 S-1300 S, 1300 S–1700 S, and 1700 S–2100 S. • Use highway elevation and stub streets to create new connections • Focus on creating safe, well-lit crossings for people walking, rolling, and bicycling • Create crossings that aren’t influenced by high-speed traffic and freeway ramps BIG IDEA Integrate development Transit-oriented development opportunities are plentiful in Ballpark, the Granary, the Depot District, and Gateway. New privately owned or developed public spaces could include crossings integrated with new buildings, parking, or other development. What is it? • Use public and private development projects along the tracks to created activated crossing opportunities • Leverage redevelopment of the Depot District and Salt Lake Central (UTA) to create public crossings • Work with TOD partners—including UTA and SLC Redevelopment Authority (RDA)—and private developers to build privately owned public spaces that create community crossings, plazas, and gathering spaces Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan104 At the time of this plan, UDOT was considering another widening of I-15. Without significant mitigation and community-centered design, further expansions to the highway will worsen many conditions described in this chapter. Cities like Boston and Seattle have buried or covered major highways as a strategy to maintain vehicular mobility, while restoring urban fabric. While these approaches add capital cost, the long-term fiscal and community benefits can be overwhelmingly positive, prove to be a major regenerative force, and provide space for cherished public lands and spaces, parks, trails, housing, and other community-centric uses. Image: The Rose Kennedy Greenway in Boston resulting from the undergrounding of the Central Artery. Source: Rose Kennedy Greenway 105 Local Spotlight: North Temple Mobility Hub Project Salt Lake City’s North Temple Mobility Hub Project is an excellent example of how physical design, programming, and digital connectivity can combine to enhance access to east–west TRAX light rail service that is not vulnerable to delay. Mobility hubs should integrate community- desired features such as public spaces, retail, or family-/youth- oriented amenities. Combined with housing and development that meets community needs and levels of affordability, mobility hubs can put more people in easy reach of reliable mobility options. Mobility hub features identified by the North Temple Study. Source: Salt Lake City ACTION Improve transportation options that support safe, affordable east– west travel A critical and cost-effective approach to breaking down east–west travel barriers is through improved travel options. Public transit has several grade-separated crossings of I-15 and the rail tracks, but these lines are not always convenient to access in Westside neighborhoods. Along with improvements to transit (see Key Move 4), creating mobility hubs and providing local services that bring people to them is a critical strategy. “Sidewalks under the freeway end abruptly and I am scared drivers won’t see me coming.” —Connect SLC community input Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan106 Case Study: Progress Park (San Francisco, CA) In 2012, a parcel of land under the I-280 on-ramp in the Dogpatch neighborhood of San Francisco was transformed into a park and neighborhood hub. Before the transformation, the land was prone to dumping and inappropriate uses. Neighboring families and residents lobbied for change, and with help from a partnership with Public Works the parcel became Progress Park, a public green space with walking paths and seating, street workout fitness amenities, and a bocce court. Despite being under a freeway, the park hosts a variety of events attended by families, children, and neighborhood residents. Progress Park has no official sources of funding and is maintained entirely by volunteers, demonstrating the tremendous power of a community coming together to create better public spaces. Source: Green Benefit District Strategy 5.3: Reclaim spaces to serve community and function at a human scale Reimagine the spaces between to be safe, secure, and supportive of the community. ACTION Create a program to bring life and community identity to “below the freeway” spaces The absence of human scale features, such as lighting, shade, and active frontages around underpasses make people feel uncomfortable, unsafe, and exposed. A program to bring activities and public art below the freeways would help transform people’s experiences and bring purpose and community gathering places to life. The Below the Freeway Program could fund things like lighting, skate parks, bicycle pump tracks, and culturally appropriate public art. Partnerships and interagency agreements between SLC and UDOT will be needed to make improvements to the right-of-way around the freeways. 107 ACTION Foster local and grassroots efforts to envision remedies and uses for “in-between” spaces Local leaders in arts, culture, and community organizing can be powerful forces of change. City-supported programs that offer small grants to improve safety, security, and public space can lead to transformative change. SLC should develop a new grant program to encourage neighborhood-driven improvements to existing underpasses and in-between spaces to generate projects that improve these areas and celebrate local community. ACTION Rethink freeway ramps Highway on- and off-ramps consume large amounts of urban real estate, create gaps in walkable, bikeable neighborhood grids, and pose safety risks for people of all modes as vehicles transition from highway to urban driving. All highway expansion projects should carefully consider how key on-and off- ramps interface with the city. In South Boston local artists imagined and brought to life a “Starry Night” sky using LED lights. Initially a temporary installation, the City has agreed to make the improvements permanent. Source: Pharos Controls Dallas deconstructed the St Paul ramp from the Woodall Rogers Freeway to develop Klyde Warren Park, which sits on a 1,200 foot-long cap over the depressed freeway. Source: Thomas McConnell via Highline Network Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan108 Strategy 5.4: Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods where prosperity is shared Bring community-supported development and amenities and an enhanced sense of place to the Westside neighborhoods. ACTION Develop complete, inclusive, transit-oriented neighborhoods Westside neighborhoods tend to host far fewer opportunities for jobs, education, recreation, and socialization within reach using existing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian networks than Eastside neighborhoods. The city should explore ways to leverage the ongoing surge in private and public sector development as a pathway to increase affordable housing, culturally appropriate public and open spaces, jobs, and services like grocery stores to reduce the need for people to travel outside their neighborhoods to meet their daily needs. Seattle’s Convention Center and Freeway Park was one of the first freeway capping projects in the world and continues to bridge rapidly developing neighborhoods on both sides of I-5. Source: Wikimedia Commons via Planetizen The “Blox” development in Copenhagen includes a museum, shops, and other public amenities, creating a public space that bridges a highway separating the city from the waterfront. Source: Arup ACTION Use grade and elevation to create great experiences New development provides opportunity to bring public spaces above ground level and create opportunity for pedestrians to cross at-grade rails or roadways without typical intersection conflicts. Almost all of SLC RDA redevelopment districts are adjacent to or cross the east–west divide. As these areas redevelop, the City, the RDA, and development partners should seek opportunities to leverage new development to bridge the divide. 109 Metrics • Travel time reliability east to west compared to north to south. • Number of safe, protected crossings for all modes between 2100 S and 600 N. • Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-injury locations such as in the Westside neighborhoods). • Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc). • Percent of income spent on transportation (Housing + Transportation Index). Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan110 Photo source: Salt Lake City PLACEHOLDER 111 Low Emissions Options Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our streets. Salt Lake City is able to achieve an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2040 to meet the Climate Positive 2040 goals by offering convenient, low emission transportation and mobility options. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 6 Photo source: UTA Our strategies 6.1 Build awareness and use of transportation options 6.2 Manage existing parking supply 6.3 Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand 6.4 Develop a curb management strategy Equity: Public spaces are reimagined for low- and no-emission travel options, improving mobility and access for all. Health and Safety: Salt Lake City enjoys cleaner air quality from reduced vehicle emissions. Affordability: Residents and employees have low-cost alternatives to driving alone. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan112 What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • Curb space is a finite resource with growing and competing demand from e-deliveries, passenger pick-up and drop-off, dining, electric vehicle charging, on-street parking and parking for bikes and scooters. • Affordable housing is in short supply, yet the oversupply of parking spaces remains a costly barrier to optimizing use of land. • Driving remains the dominant way of travel in SLC; alternative travel options are not available or are not well understood. • While there have been many studies over the past decade recommending changes to SLC’s parking, curb usage, and alternative mobility options, implementation has been limited. Local Spotlight: Climate Positive 2040 Plan SLC’s Climate Positive 2040 Plan outlines strategies to achieve an 80% reduction in Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2040 compared to the 2009 baseline. Transportation-related strategies to achieve the goal include increasing the use of public transit, promoting active transportation, accelerating electric vehicle adoption, and reducing emissions from air travel. WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • Ride with Hive is a program that offers a 50% discount to SLC residents to ride buses, TRAX, and the S-Line Streetcar. • The SLC School District transit pass program offers transit passes to students, faculty, and staff district-wide at no cost, promoting both transit use and improved air quality. • Smart Trips was a City-sponsored program offering free transit passes, bike gear, and education materials to help people take advantage of transportation options. • Off-street parking regulations provide parking minimums and maximums based on proximity to transit and land use. In areas with a mix of land uses that are near transit, developers may be exempt from providing a minimum number of vehicle parking spaces. • The City Permit Parking (CPP) program is SLC’s residential permit parking program, managing all day non-resident vehicle parking in and near residential areas. • The Sidewalk Dining Design Guidelines balance the competing demands for use on public sidewalks and curb space. 113 Strategy 6.1: Build awareness and use of transportation options Promote transportation and mobility options as sustainable and affordable alternatives to driving alone. ACTION Hire a transportation options program manager Providing businesses, employees, and residents with a single source of information for transportation options can simplify communications and facilitate participation in transportation options programs. SLC should hire a transportation options (TO) program manager to lead the creation of a branded centralized website for TO information, as well as strengthen partnerships with TO providers including UTA, GREENbike, and other micromobility options. The program manager should conduct education and outreach with employers to increase awareness and participation in TO programs, reducing car travel and increasing the proportion of people who bike, walk, take transit, and share rides. ACTION Expand student and education pass programs Students from elementary to university are great pioneers of building a transit culture. TO programs catered to school travel greatly support the education system and help meet climate goals. UTA and the SLC School District have recently partnered to offer a one-year pilot program with free transit passes for all K-12 students, while 15 universities and private schools have discounted transit passes negotiated with UTA. Free or discounted pass programs alone will not systemically get more people on transit. The City should explore complementary strategies to help encourage and promote transportation options. Actions include promoting bus access options to popular afterschool activity centers and recreational destinations, creating a “bike bus” program, and setting up a transit “buddy system” to help new students navigate public transportation together. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan114 Case Study: PBOT Transportation Wallet (Portland, OR) The Portland Bureau of Transportation (PBOT) designates parking districts throughout Portland and offers packaged transportation wallets to reduce parking demand and incentivize transportation by all modes within the districts. The transportation wallet includes bundled transportation incentives, including an annual streetcar pass and credit for transit; and bikeshare, scooter, and carshare credits. People living and working in the parking districts can purchase transportation wallets for 87% off the retail cost. Alternatively, they can receive the wallet for free when they trade in an eligible parking permit or if they qualify for TriMet’s Low Income Transit Fare. ACTION Implement a transportation wallet A transportation wallet incentivizes people in areas with good access to transportation options to give up their residential parking permits in exchange for transit passes or other transportation credits. The wallet should include a package of transportation options such as transit passes, bikeshare and micromobility credits, and ridehailing or carshare credits. This does not prohibit the use of a car, but disincentivizes private car ownership to alleviate demand on parking while meeting transportation and emissions goals. Source: Portland Transportation Wallet 115 Case Study: Shift Transportation Options (TO) Program (San Francisco, CA) San Francisco established Shift, a TO program designed to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) induced by new development by setting a VMT reduction target and implementing TO measures. Targets are set based on proposed land uses and number of accessory parking spaces built. Developers work with the City to select from a menu of TO measures to create a TO plan and achieve the VMT target. Examples include improved pedestrian infrastructure, bicycle facilities, on-site childcare, unbundling of parking costs from housing costs, and parking cash-out. The TO plan is then submitted to the City and included as a condition of approval of the development. Property owners must routinely report on compliance with the TO plan. Source: Transportation Demand Mnaagement Program, City and County of San Francisco ACTION Incentivize developers to incorporate TDM into the development process Achieving mode shift will take commitment from the development community. SLC can incentivize developers to reduce anticipated traffic impacts and improve multimodal access to and from the site. Examples of incentives can include density bonuses, reductions in parking minimums, and reductions in right-of-way fees. The City should develop an online menu of multimodal strategies and programs for developers to choose from to achieve maximum flexibility in their design while providing the greatest benefit to the City. STANDARDS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPTED AUGUST 4, 2016 Version 3. Updated March 11, 2021 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan116 Strategy 6.2: Manage existing parking supply Use a data-driven approach to track and achieve transportation and climate goals. ACTION Consolidate parking functions under a new parking program SLC’s parking functions are spread across several City departments. The City should better coordinate parking-related functions under a single parking program and hire a parking program manager. The new program manager should be a seasoned parking professional with experience managing municipal systems of similar complexity and demonstrated understanding of parking’s role in an integrated, multimodal transportation system. The parking manager should be responsible for managing public on- and off-street parking facilities, including implementing a robust parking utilization and performance tracking system, optimizing a parking mobile application to improve the parking experience, and implementing a unified brand and wayfinding program. This role should also support developers to draft shared parking agreements. ACTION Understand parking utilization and performance Better parking management requires proper understanding of the utilization and performance of existing parking infrastructure. SLC should develop performance and utilization metrics to understand and manage the city’s current on- and off-street parking inventory. This set of metrics should form a parking information database that is maintained by SLC. Parking data from the parking application provides insights on when, where, and how parking is used. A public-private partnership between the City and private parking companies should be formed to share performance and utilization data to improve parking management and price parking effectively throughout the city. Centralized management and leadership in parking Salt Lake City last completed a parking management study in 2012. The 2012 study found inadequate coordination among the City’s municipal divisions for parking management. Today, City staff are advocating for improved parking management coordination, performance monitoring, and communication with residents and visitors about parking concerns. 117 ACTION Optimize a single mobile parking application With a mix of public and private parking options throughout SLC, parking cost and availability need to be better communicated. ParkSLC is an existing mobile application intended to help users pay for parking in SLC. Resources should be dedicated to upgrade ParkSLC to be consistent with changes in branding (Strategy 6.3) and tie in with parkingslc.com functions such as finding parking. App operations should be integrated with physical parking infrastructure, including wayfinding and signage, to alleviate frustration with finding and paying for parking. Case Study: Parking Kitty (Portland, OR) Parking Kitty is a mobile pay app managed by the City of Portland. It allows patrons to pay and add time to parking sessions directly from their phone and will send reminders when a parking session is almost over. On-street parking and publicly owned parking garages in Portland are marked with Parking Kitty signs and zone numbers to make it easy to pay for parking. Parking Kitty is also available on mobile browsers. Source: parkingkitty.com, City of Portland Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan118 Strategy 6.3: Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand Provide clear parking guidance to facilitate a park-once experience for those who need to drive. ACTION Create an updated parking brand and communications plan Establishing a brand communicates a consistent, recognizable message. Currently, parkingslc.com offers a wealth of information on where and how to find parking in garages, lots, and on-street. SLC should create a brand—a unified look and feel for all things parking—to support a centralized parking program. An updated website should be the foundation of the brand, in addition to maps, wayfinding and signage, and other communications materials. ACTION Prioritize clear and consistent wayfinding and signage SLC’s parking supply is underutilized. In areas where parking is perceived to be limited, such as Downtown SLC, wayfinding should direct people to available parking, facilitate vehicle flow, and make it easy to pay for parking. Wayfinding should also be available for people who walk, roll, and bike. In addition to helping with navigation, signage should display real-time information at lots or garages such as number of available spots, or alternative available parking locations to reduce confusion and frustration. ACTION Pilot a park-once- and-walk district in Downtown SLC A park-once-and-walk district means visitors can park once and access multiple destinations without using a car. Currently, Downtown SLC is part of UTA’s Free Fare Zone where TRAX and buses are free. It is also classified as “Transit Context” per the City’s parking code, which means businesses can provide minimal off-street parking. SLC should pilot a park-once-and-walk district to reduce traffic, promote shared parking, and improve parking availability for businesses. Revenue from parking in the district should be directly reinvested to upgrade pedestrian infrastructure such as sidewalks, benches, and street trees or fund transportation options programs. Parking revenue can also fund bike parking and other micromobility options. 119 Case Study: Old Pasadena Parking District (Pasadena, CA) Old Pasadena is a downtown historic district with more than 200 destinations and attractions for shopping, dining, arts, and entertainment. Visitors can park at on-street metered parking, and revenue from meter parking is used to fund programs to maintain the streetscapes and alley walkways in Old Pasadena. Visitors are encouraged to park at any of the three Park & Walk garages that are centrally located and provide walkable access to the variety of destinations without having to drive. Park & Walk garages are marked on maps with P&W icons and offer hourly and daily pricing so drivers do not have to move their vehicles during their visit. Source: Old Pasadena Walking Map Chado Tea Room OSAWA Restaurant Bone Kettle FoundrSpace Bodegon No. 69 PURE Nails Spa 85°CBakery Café Th e 3 5 e r B a r Kings RowGastropub TheCellar Va n s He l l o G e l a t o We O l i v e & W i n e B a r Chef TonyDim Sum Gloss Nail Spa BrooklynSquare Me d W e i g h t L o s s Yi F a n g F r u i t T e a Dining, Nightlife, Snacks, Coffee, & Tea Valet Stand Park & Walk Garages (First 2 hrs $1 then $2/hr up to $12 daily max) Public Parking Metro Gold Line Station ATM Health, Beauty, & Spa Cultural, Community, & Specialty Services Apparel & Accessories Home, Gifts, & Specialty Retail Old Pasadena Directory Map N De Lacey Schoolhouse Marriott One Colorado Memorial Park Gold Line Station Del MarGold LineStation An d e r s o n Bu s i n e s s Ap p l e S t o r e AT&T Jimmy John’sGourmetSandwiches BunkerExperience Blick Art Materials Ro c h e B o b o i s El i s a B . The Container Store CrownCityLoan De s i g n Wi t h i n R e a c h House ofIntuition Everson RoyceWine & Tasting FishbecksPatio Center Playground WhitmoreRareBooks Incycle Bicycles MaudeWoods Old PasadenaGeneralStore Pa p e r S o u r c e Pl a c e Ve n d ô m e PotteryBarn Re s t o r a t i o n Ha r d w a r e Ro m a n t i x Steiner Library Se i h o I n t e r n a t i o n a l T-MobileSprint Ti f f a n y & C o . Cigars by Chivas Mo t t o Te a C a f e RamenTatsunoya Lemon TreePasadena Fishwives Parachute Cl o t h e s H e a v e n Cr o s s r o a d s Tr a d i n g C o . Ei l e e n F i s h e r J. Crew Je n e t t e B r a s NE O P a s a d e n a Patagonia Ma d e w e l l Za r a Th e S h a d e S t o r e Ur b a n O u t f i t t e r s Su n g l a s s H u t Idealab BananaRepublic PanacheBridal Au d i o E l e m e n t Anthropologie Crêpes de Paris Ni k e R u n n i n g Fi n n + W i l l o w Un i o n S a n d w i c h True FoodKitchen Fr e e P e o p l e Fo o t l o c k e r - H o u s e o f H o o p s Av o c a d o M a t t r e s s FriendshipPasadenaChurch Pasadena FireDept. Station 31 Livery Studio Pa s a d e n a Se n i o r C e n t e r Bickley Printing RococoRoom Pr i x A d o r n m e n t Ch a s e B a n k Cu r a t o r i a l IPICTheaters Armory Center for the Arts Courtyard by Marriott Pasadena Shell Gas Station Eco AutoCare Church of Scientology Enchantress RomanesqueRoom Library HallLofts Ol d P a s a d e n a Co l l e c t i o n A p a r t m e n t s Old PasadenaPharmacy &Marketplace Richard HolbrookDesign BicosHospitality Hair byCesaré Union Salon Pure Barre Sc i z z o r Ha i r S a l o n Pa s . E l i t e F i t n e s s Massage Room Harmony Nail Ta n g l e s S a l o n Burke Williams Spa Bar Method La t h e r SOH Grill House Ev a n t h é A v e d a Ha i r S a l o n Pa s a d e n a Be a u t y B a r BodyFirm Cl a s s i c Ki c k b o x i n g EmblushBeaute SoapKitchen Twigzz Sephora Bo k a o s Av e d a Ch i g n o n H a i r S a l o n Whimsy Pasadena We l l s F a r g o Home Brewed Bar Ro c c o ’ s T a v e r n So f a U L o v e Co r e P o w e r Y o g a Bo i l i n g P o i n t Ji n T e a S h o p CozyStylishChic Room & Board Fa r r o w & B a l l Daddy’sChickenShack SageVeganBistro One ColoradoCourtyard Christensen Alley Fraser Alley McCormick Alley Edwin Alley Sm i t h A l l e y Mi l l e r A l l e y Do u g l a s A l l e y Mil l s P l a c e Martin Alley Ma r m o r a A l l e y Ca r r A l l e y No o d l e S t . All India Café AmaraCafé Ma e s t r o SO R R I S O Ba r n e y ’ s B e a n e r y Bu c a d i B e p p o Pe a r l T h a i E a t e r y Ti b e t N e p a l H o u s e CaféSantorini Ma m a M Su s h i Ch e e s e c a k e Fa c t o r y Cl u b 5 4 Blue BottleCoffee Taco Libre Dog Haus Scizzor91 DotsCupcakes El Toreo CaféEdwin Mills by Equator FatherNature GrandviewPalace Gy u - K a k u J a p a n e s e BB Q D i n i n g He y , Th a t ’ s Am o r e ! De LaceyNails HimalayanCafé Ho t W i n g s C a f é Il FornaioCucinaItaliana In t e l l i g e n t s i a IX T a p a C a n t i n a KingTaco Th e K i t c h e n La GrandeOrange Café LuckyBaldwins Pub The LuggageRoom Pizzeria Mi P i a c e I t a l i a n Ki t c h e n & B a k e r y Mig n o n C h o c o l a t e Su s h i S t o p The Speakeasy Old TownePub Q’ s B i l l i a r d C l u b Copa Vida Russell’s Po k e S a l a d B a r St a r b u c k s Su b w a y Sushi Roku Su s h i E n y a TortasMexico El e c t r i c D r i v e Hayes Alley Exchange Alley Brainard Alley Mercantile Place Br a l e y C o u r t Ke n d a l l A l l e y Le g g e A l l e y Compass De W i t t A l g o r r i Al g o r r i SW A A r c h i t e c t s Ba k e r A l l e y Central Court Plotkin Alley Hugus Alley Pacific Alley El e c t r i c D r i v e Bonham Aly Morgan Alley Specstacular In d i a n a C o l o n y Va l e n t i n e S w e e t s Un i o n R e s t a u r a n t Te s l a M o t o r s 2n d S t r e e t U S A Sc o t c h & S o d a Ka b u k i Hu s t l e r H o l l y w o o d Courtyard atFair Oaks Tea RoseGarden Beer & Claw Dog Bakery Neon Retro Arcade Roll Factoryby Stray Cat Sh a n t ’ s C l o c k MI N I S O SanctuaryFitness Ch o n g Q i n g Ya o M e i H o t p o t FightAcademy Raymond Renaissance Color MeMine Slater’s 50/50 The Blind Donkey En t r e N o u s Fr e n c h B i s t r o Ze m r u s Es c r o w FM F i n a n c i a l 80 N. Raymond Condominiums Telacu Courtyard Apartments Marine Building Law Offices Pa s a d e n a En d o s c o p y C e n t e r Th e H e t t e m a G r o u p StoneCompanyStore Der Wolf Updated November 2022 - Map not to scale. W GREEN ST E GREEN ST Memorial Park Central Park Restrooms Lu l u l e m o n A t h l e t i c a Pe l o t o n Me + C r e p e All Love Collections Prolece Tea One Zo Boba Pi n o t ’ s P a l e t t e Pi n k S u g a r & W a x CTRL Collective 21 ChoicesFrozenYogurt Re d i r e c t Mk t g Homage Cheeks& Co.Wa r b y P a r k e r Roots & RyeAcai Bar Di r t D o g Ch a R e d e f i n e Ma i n C h i c k Ta c o s 1 9 8 6 Pa p e r R i c e Na u g h t y P a n d a Ki c k s n e a k e r Jamba Coffee& Plants Sa l t & S t r a w Ga m e o l o g y Cu s t o m C o m f o r t Ma t t r e s s Cr a v e C a f e Kaviar Sushi Pe r l e DelightPastry Jake’s U S t r e e t P i z z a Ag n e s R e s t a u r a n t M. An d o n i a Industrious Cr a t e & B a r r e l D e s i g n S t u d i o Al l b i r d s Leafy Ro t h y ’ s Ae s o p Al f r e d Il FornaioBakery Go l d B u g Po p p i n g Y o l k Old Town Gymnasium Te m p u r - P e d i c Lo v e S a c Moom 48Thai Do s B e s o s Kr e a t i o n Tacos Super Gallito Beard Papa’sSu n r i g h t T e a The Next Oakobing bb . q C h i c k e n De La Ruio Lashes Yuzu Shabu& Grill SATO Ramen House ElevatedPhysicalTherapy Sa m e d a y H e a l t h DesignerDomicile Lu c i d Mo t o r s Boba Cha Cha Ca r n e l i a n S a l o n Cr a f t b y S m o k e & F i r e He r m a n M i l l e r Sweet Life RorinLo Ba r C e l o n a Mic h a e l H a l l Fi n e A r t SkinLaundry 3C a t e a G o In t e r i o r D e f i n e Royalty Salon MA U M Ge n e r a l Pilates Sculpt Le C h a t e a u de T i e n T a o VieroBridal HeadSpa EN I Like Pie Bakeshop Planta Go r j a n a Dr . M a r t e n s S t o r e Ci r c a L i g h t i n g Playground Castle Green turns heads with its architectural pedigree and prowess Band Shell The Memorial Park Band Shell dates to the 1930s and is host to free concerts under the stars. Restrooms Castle Green S P A S A D E N A A V E N P A S A D E N A A V E W COLORADO BLVD E COLORADO BLVD S F A I R O A K S A V E S A R R O Y O P K W Y E WALNUT STW WALNUT ST N F A I R O A K S A V E E DEL MAR BLVD W UNION ST E UNION ST LEONARD V. PIERONI ST W DAYTON ST S D E L A C E Y A V E N D E L A C E Y A V E S R A Y M O N D A V E N R A Y M O N D A V E HOLLY ST W VALLEY ST E HOLLY ST B i g Ban g Th e o r y W a y Bi g B a n g T heo ry Way Big Bang Theory Way 75 W.3 W.1 E. 48 S . 82 S . 17 5 S . 65 E.83 E. 16 N . 44 N . 10 0 N . WALK SCORE WALKER’S PARADISE95 BIKER’S PARADISE BIKE SCORE96 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan120 Strategy 6.4: Develop a curb management strategy Modernize curb management practices to meet expanding demands on the curb. ACTION Conduct a survey for existing curb uses across SLC To better understand the opportunities and challenges of managing curb space, SLC should conduct a comprehensive survey of existing conditions and peer review of best practices. Inventorying existing curb uses will help staff and the public better understand how curb space is being used today and the potential opportunities that exist. Interviews with partner agency staff will also help the City understand how various stakeholders impact curb space and identify the diverse needs and perspectives of curb users from parking to delivery services to bus stop placement. ACTION Implement a project to pilot innovative and shared curb uses While there are many possibilities for improved and dynamic curb uses, not all are equally applicable to different contexts. Pilot projects allow the City to conduct trials in a controlled setting and at a smaller scale, illuminating how different stakeholders will respond to the change in curb uses. Conducting pilot projects is also a great way to involve local residents, employers, and the surrounding community in the design process, clearly addressing their needs and concerns. Why manage the curb? Curbs are one of SLC’s largest public assets, playing a multitude of roles within the city—they are a physical barrier between the street and sidewalk, a loading zone for goods and people, a storage facility for parking automobiles and, in some cases, shared mobility devices, and more. Several of these uses compete for space, often resulting in prioritization of parking for single occupancy vehicles over other uses. Use of the curb has a direct and substantial impact on placemaking, especially in high use areas. A curb management strategy is needed because the curb: • Is one of our largest public resources • Has a growing number of demands • Connects us to transportation options • Can be a tool to achieve community goals to reduce emissions and encourage people to bike, walk, take transit, and share rides 121 BANK BANK RESTA U R A N T RESTA U R A N T PARK I N G PAvaila b l e : 8 8 Occup i e d : 4 1 2 ++ PHARMACY PHARMACY No Par k i n g Tow Z o n e 9:00PM – 3 : 0 0 A M THUR–S A T No Pa r k i n g Tow Z o n e 9:00PM – 3 : 0 0 A M THUR– S A T 2 hou rParki n g 7:00AM – 9 : 0 0 P M THUR– S A T 2 hou rParki n g 7:00AM – 9 : 0 0 P M THUR– S A T 2 hou rParki n g 7:00AM – 9 : 0 0 P M THUR– S A T No Par k i n g Tow Z o n e 9:00PM – 3 : 0 0 A M THUR–S A T No Par k i n g Tow Z o n e 9:00PM – 3 : 0 0 A M THUR–S A T 2 hou rParkin g 7:00AM – 9 : 0 0 P M THUR– S A T No Parkin g Tow Zon e 9:00PM–3: 0 0 A M THUR–SAT2 hour Parking 7:00AM–9 : 0 0 P M THUR–SAT No Parki n g Tow Zon e 9:00PM–3 : 0 0 A M THUR–SAT2 hour Parking 7:00AM–9 : 0 0 P M THUR–SAT PARKING COMEDY COMEDY U T A Today, the curb is ... How we manage the curb will change Prioritized for cars.At odds with our climate goals. Subsidized – even in areas with priced parking, the true cost is not passed on to drivers. Confusing – it’s difficult to understand what is allowed where. 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan122 U T A U T A PARK I N G PAvaila b l e : 8 8 Occup i e d : 4 1 2 15 mi n loadin g 15 mi n loadin g BANK BANK ++ PHARMACY PHARMACY pARKING 2 hour pARKING 2 hour 15 mi n loadin g PARKING RESTA U R A N T RESTA U R A N T COMEDY COMEDY Tomorrow, our curbs should be ... Prioritized for shared transportation options like carshare, shuttle, and carpoolers. Priced appropriately to shift people away from private vehicles. Supportive of delivery services, ridehail loading, and eventual autonomous vehicles. Activated for other uses like parklets and dining. 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 123 Case Study: SFMTA Curb Management Strategy and Design Guidelines (San Francisco, CA) Recognizing that curb space is a finite resource, San Francisco Muni published a new framework categorizing the hierarchy of curb functions and presented a list of strategies and policies to overhaul the management of curb space. The Guidelines support planners and engineers in curb zone placement and design as part of SFMTA projects and include guidance on data collection from surveys to video observations. Some notable recommendations include: • Standardize curb data inventory • Develop public communications and information campaigns on parking and loading regulations • Study pricing to address curb use impacts • Expand the use of loading zones that vary based on time of day • Prioritize disability access in curb management 80 feet of curb can serve: 4 Private Vehicles 22 Mopeds/Motorcycles 32 Shared Bikes 1 40’ Coach Bus 8 22 32 63 THE SFMTA’S APPROACH: LOOKING AT THE CURB THROUGH A NEW LENS By first allocating space to those uses that provide the greatest amount of access, the curb can facilitate the movement of more people and goods, more effectively utilizing limited curb space and helping ensure direct access to the curb for individuals with mobility limitations. CURB MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Source: SFMTA Curb Management Strategy Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan124 Metrics • Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). • Percentage of curb space not allocated for parking. • Percentage of parking revenue invested in mobility options. • Parking performance (occupancy, turnover, violations). • Awareness of transportation options programs via biennial citywide transportation surveys. ACTION Develop Curb Management Guidelines The above two actions will set up SLC to establish a blueprint for the future, defining how curb space should be prioritized based on the local context, community goals, and current and future demands on urban streets. Based on the curb use inventory and results of the pilot project(s), SLC should create a document that outlines Curb Management Guidelines to help prioritize how curbs are used and managed across the city. 125 Places for People Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community gathering places. Tools, incentives, and standards help to leverage private development and create places for people. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 7 Photo source: Salt Lake City Sustainability: Facilities are built to support people to bike, walk, take transit, and share rides more often. Equity: Capital funding is distributed equitably by creating priority networks. Our strategies 7.1 Leverage private investment in high growth areas 7.2 Promote connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts What we heard • Homogeneous residential districts put daily destinations farther away, which means trips are longer and people have a hard time biking, walking, and taking transit. • Long blocks make it challenging for people to connect to destinations. • Investments—along with new development—are needed to help create attractive public spaces in our communities. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan126 Strategy 7.1: Leverage private investment in high growth areas Invest in open and green space to support development and create beautiful public spaces. ACTION Create public realm action plans Public realm action plans in high growth neighborhoods help guide mobility and public space investments. These plans identify opportunities for pocket parks, linear parks, alley revitalization, and land acquisition opportunities to create more open and green space. SLC should reallocate right-of-way (ROW), leverage multi-agency partnerships, and repurpose land acquisition funds to create park- like spaces in the ROW in areas that lack public parks and green space. ACTION Incentivize developers to implement adopted street concept plans Street concept plans provide a common vision shared between community members, property owners, developers, and city officials. Multiple property owners typically implement street concept plans over time as parcels on the block redevelop. Ten percent street concept plans should be developed for signature streets in the areas that have the most potential for transformation. The plans should be formally adopted by the SLC Transportation Department to provide confidence to developers that they have been properly vetted by subject matter experts to reduce their risk in the review process. Incentives to encourage implementation could include density bonuses or a reduction in right-of-way fees during construction. Case Study: Street Design Concept Plan Program (Seattle, WA) The City of Seattle’s Street Design Concept Plan Program includes formally adopted concept plans for more than a dozen streets, such as Terry Avenue, that have a high potential for new development. Terry Avenue street concept plan (Seattle, WA). Source: Gustafson Guthrie Nichol Ltd. via Community Design + Architecture 127 Case Study: City of Seattle Public Life Program (Seattle, WA) The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) developed the Public Life Program in 2017 to collect and elevate ‘people data’ through public life studies to understand how our public spaces are being used and by whom through observational research methods. The results of a public life study provide SDOT with people-centered data to make investment decisions, evaluate designs and interventions, and understand what makes a successful public space. Vine Street in Seattle, WA. Source: Mike Nakamura, via NACTO ACTION Establish a Green Street network Green Streets are legislated in the land use code and designed to give priority to pedestrian circulation and open space. Discretionary pedestrian improvements on Green Streets enable private development to receive bonus density. The Green Street network should include streets that are conducive to green stormwater infrastructure, including soil infiltration, slopes, and right-of-way availability. As a first step, SLC has committed to developing a downtown Green Loop to be built over the next 5-10 years, which will feature urban linear parks and urban forests. Expansion to a codified, citywide initiative can transform the public realm and promote healthy, walkable communities across the city. Key steps to develop a Green Street network include: • Create a Green Streets GIS layer in the Complete Streets StoryMap. • Develop interdepartmental agreements to foster partnerships between Department of Public Works and Department of Public Safety. • Dedicate staff resources to tracking and coordinating with private development to foster partnerships in a timely way. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan128 Strategy 7.2: Promote connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts Enhance connectivity to help people get around easily. ACTION Value street and alley vacations A street or alley vacation is a type of easement in which a public agency transfers the right-of-way of a public street to a private property owner. Salt Lake City should put a high value on street and alley vacations beyond the appraisal, recognizing that street vacations can limit the permeability of the network for pedestrians over time. Street vacations should be offset with comparable public benefits to the pedestrian and public space network. ACTION Require midblock pathways Salt Lake City has some of the longest blocks in the country, hindering connectivity. To avoid large blocks that exceed 300’ in length, SLC should require midblock pathways between or through parcels to achieve more permeability at the block level to encourage walking and to add more visual interest and depth to large scale developments. Implementation of midblock through connections can also be achieved through public benefits resulting from street and/ or alley vacations, incentive programs, and/or cost waivers for right-of-way improvements. Metrics • Number of uninterrupted blocks (without midblock crossings) in the city. • Creation of and progress on Green Streets. 129 Operationalize Complete Streets Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership. Streets are the lifeblood of our neighborhoods. Their design affects our behaviors and decisions—how safe we feel, where we can or choose to live, how we get around, how easy it is to get to the doctor, whether our kids walk or bike to school, and our physical, environmental, and economic health. To ensure our streets are designed for the people of Salt Lake, we must foster a cultural shift at the City of Salt Lake to support Complete Streets outcomes from planning to implementation to asset management. Supporting our values KEY MOVE 8 Photo source: Salt Lake City Our strategies 8.1 Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design and management 8.2 Develop tools to guide decision-making 8.3 Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development Sustainability: Our streets and transportation assets are built and maintained to help people travel sustainably. Equity and Affordability: Investments in transportation ensure safe and reliable travel for everyone in all parts of the city. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan130 What’s happening in SLC? WHAT WE HEARD • There is a lack of coordination across city departments and no centralized role in charge of street projects for their lifetimes. • Improved coordination between divisions and departments is needed to implement complete street projects (particularly planning, design, utilities, and maintenance). • Support and partnership are needed to ensure complete street outcomes on UDOT owned streets. • Chartering and interdepartmental agreements are needed for utility and street tree conflicts and street lighting. WHAT WE’RE DOING NOW • The Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide defines designs for 17 distinct types of streets. • A Complete Streets Ordinance was adopted in 2010, requiring streets to be designed, operated, and maintained for all modes of travel, including people walking and biking and for travelers of all ages and abilities. • Complete Streets assessments are completed in the Transportation Division but commitments are often the first thing to fall off when budgets are constrained. Photo Source: Lance Tyrell via slc.gov 131 Cafe HARDWARE CLINIC GROCERIES A P T S PHARMACYSTORE P RESTAURANT DOWNTOWN What does a Complete Street feel like? Complete streets and intersections ensure safe and equitable access, mobility, and opportunities for people of all ages, abilities, incomes, races, ethnicities, and genders. They are: • Sensitive and responsive to land use and ecological contexts. • Slow, encouraging responsible movement through physical design. • Inclusive of diverse transportation choices (bus and rail transit, bikeways, walkways, diverse curbside uses, mobility devices, motor vehicle lanes, shared spaces, and/or freight, depending on context). • Interconnected, providing a network of streets that allow people to get from place to place directly and safely. • Balanced, providing space for mobility, access, greening, placemaking, and other functions of a street. Not every street needs to contain all elements, but a complete streets network ensures that everyone has a safe and convenient travel option. TRANSIT STOPS include amenities to make transit more desirable and accessible MID-BLOCK CROSSWALKS provide safe and convenient walking paths and reduce vehicle speeds WIDE SIDEWALKS provide ample room for people walking and rolling, enhance the public realm, and spur activity Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan132 Cafe HARDWARE CLINIC GROCERIES A P T S PHARMACYSTORE P RESTAURANT DOWNTOWN STREET PARKING AND LOADING is strategically planned to maximize utilization STREET LIGHTING increases safety and creates human scale BIKE PARKING makes it convenient to visit nearby attractions BIKE LANES provide protection from vehicle and pedestrian traffic LANDSCAPING creates a comfortable and inviting pedestrian environment and establishes green streets 133 Strategy 8.1: Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design and management Engage a broader multidisciplinary team in project development to ensure consistent, high-quality Complete Streets outcomes. ACTION Integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle Salt Lake City has an adopted ordinance, leadership support, and staff resources that are dedicated to Complete Streets. For change to infiltrate throughout the organization, the process needs to become decentralized and integrated into how the City plans, develops, designs, manages, and maintains its streets and transportation assets. All departments and divisions involved in these activities should have ownership of Complete Streets outcomes, which are central to the community vision and goals of Connect SLC. ACTION Structure project development teams to ensure accountability City staff with different skills and responsibilities are involved in planning, designing, and implementing street projects. Each has accountability for distinct outcomes and when projects transition between divisions, design outcomes can naturally shift. SLC should engage all accountable parties early and keep everyone engaged throughout the project development, delivery, and maintenance lifecycle to ensure safety, equity, and mobility outcomes are balanced and community inputs are realized. A Complete Streets Steering Committee (see action at right) can ensure leadership support. At the staff level, creating a project development division (or comparable staff structure) will ensure engagement of all needed subject matter experts early and continually. The case study at right describes a success story for this approach. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan134 Case Study: Complete Streets Program (Seattle, WA) The Policy and Planning Division of the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) administers the Complete Streets program. Program management includes accountability, tracking, and training to ensure that the framework is in compliance with the legislated mandate and in keeping with best practice. However, the Complete Streets assessment for each capital project is the responsibility of the “project developer,” who resides in the Project Development Division. This process requires signing off on the scope of work by a core team of interdisciplinary subject matter experts before a project can advance past 30% design. A project manager in the Capital Projects Division participates in the 0-30% phase (planning and concept design) and continues in the management of later design phases ensuring that the Complete Streets assessment and goals are realized. This process weighs each subject matter expert equally. If there is disagreement at the staff level by any subject matter expert, then the project is escalated to an Executive Steering Committee for final decisions on scope of work and budget. Prior to the establishment of a Project Development Division, Policy and Planning was responsible for finalizing all Complete Streets assessments for capital projects, in accordance with the Complete Streets ordinance. This resulted in a ‘watch dog’ role within the organization; Complete Streets outcomes were more sporadic and were often reliant on the good will of the project manager. The organizational changes resulted in institutional change and broader accountability over Complete Streets outcomes. ACTION Establish a Complete Streets Steering Committee A Complete Streets Steering Committee should be established to provide regular coordination between key department and division leadership and joint accountability for various stages and functions of Complete Street planning, design, delivery, and maintenance. The Committee will also be responsible for making policy and organizational recommendations to ensure effective Complete Streets processes and outcomes, consider and grant exceptions to policy, coordinate funding and budgeting, and create an annual report on Complete Streets efforts in the city. The Committee should include the following members or their appointees: • Transportation Division Director • Engineering Division Director/City Engineer • Planning Division Director • Building Services Director • Streets Division Director • Department of Airports Director • Public Lands Division Director • Public Utilities Division Director • Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Source: Complete Streets Program, SDOT 135 Strategy 8.2: Develop tools to guide decision-making ACTION Update the Quality Transportation Improvement Program screening tool to align with Connect SLC Salt Lake City’s Quality Transportation Improvement Program (QTIP) is a tool that uses criteria aligned with City values and priorities— including equity-centered criteria—to inform decision-making about capital project and program priorities. An update of the QTIP tool will align with Connect SLC goals and ensure smaller projects—and those that provide critical connections to areas in need—are better positioned for funding. Recommended updates are provided below: • Criteria Review: Update the existing criteria to align with Connect SLC goals including a review of equity criteria. • Safety: Move away from heat map analysis for severe and fatal crashes so that every incidence is considered. • Automated Scoring: Automate the scoring process to improve the speed at which projects can be scored. • Connectivity Metric: Create a metric to evaluate a project’s value with respect to the larger mobility context (e.g., a small completion of a larger trail network that would not otherwise score very highly). ACTION Develop data-driven storytelling tools to support Complete Streets assessments Operationalizing Complete Streets with easy-to-use tools and easy linkages to relevant data is critical to ensure the process is manageable and useful to City staff. Clear communication tools can also ensure equity and safety are centered in the process and staff have clear communication tools when meeting internally and with the public. A GIS StoryMap can serve as a universal tool to walk project managers through the Complete Streets assessment with data sources hyperlinked to each section. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan136 ACTION Align capital projects with policies and best practice City staff require data-based protocols and tools to ensure that the policy intent of our Complete Streets Ordinance is implemented through street design and operations. Analytical tools, metrics, and/ or thresholds that have historically been used to assess project- level impacts often favor vehicular level of service (LOS) and can make it difficult to implement multimodal transportation projects. SLC should develop tools and policies that can help measure and balance Complete Streets goals. • Create a Multimodal Level of Service policy to apply to capital projects that establishes acceptable levels of vehicle delay if and when LOS for other modes like biking and transit improves. • Establish pedestrian and bicycle crossing policies based on system needs and actual use patterns or projections. • Develop and use a form of preventative modeling to assess safety risks for vulnerable street users instead of using crash data to justify safety improvements – understanding how, why, and where crashes may happen. Case Study: Vehicular Level of Service Policy Application for Capital Projects (Seattle, WA) Seattle has robust Complete Streets policies and support from leadership to shift to a sustainable transportation network. However, multimodal capital projects were often evaluated using the same metrics and thresholds as vehicular-based projects. A level of service (LOS) policy was developed to ensure that vehicular delay did not serve as a roadblock to multimodal project implementation. The Complete Streets assessment requires an agreement between the project manager and the traffic engineer to agree on alternative metrics that will be used to assess potential multimodal impacts. (For example, an important metric for a bike project may be the resultant delays to transit.) 137 ACTION Formalize use of the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide in project development The SLC Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide provides direction on how street design can shape the city around our values and goals. Its 17 street typologies should be used to guide implementation and inform dimensional standards for street capital projects. The SLC Transportation Division should work with development review teams to ensure the guidelines are used when developers rebuild street frontages or street and alley segments. For example, ensuring pedestrian clear space and greening dimensions as a buffer between sidewalk and travel lanes are met can improve the quality of the pedestrian experience. ACTION Require compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide in the Complete Streets assessment Capital projects should reflect project relevant dimensions of the street type assignment. For instance, if a protected bike lane is proposed, it should match the facility design and corresponding dimensions that are illustrated in the Design Guide. For projects that do not meet the dimensional standards depicted in the Design Guide, a deviation for capital projects should be required as part of the Complete Streets assessment. Metrics • Track compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide, particularly the number of deviations granted. • Track Complete Streets elements added to projects as a result of the interdepartmental process. • Provide a public facing dashboard where finalized Complete Streets assessments can be viewed. Strategy 8.3: Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan138 139 Achieving our vision Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan140 6 Connect SLC is a guide for how we move and connect people, goods, and our community. It is an expression of our collective values and a roadmap for how we work together to achieve our goals as a community. Achieving the Connect SLC vision requires commitment to creating ongoing community conversations, better organizing our City departments for coordinated project delivery, leveraging partnerships with other organizations, and upholding our commitment to report on key outcomes to hold ourselves accountable. 141 An ongoing community conversation Implementation of Connect SLC starts with a commitment to engaging the community in new ways. Connect SLC sets the stage for the City, agency partners, and the community to engage in ongoing conversations to help ensure transportation projects, programs, and investments reflect the needs of—and are co-created with—the community. SLC recognizes that Westside neighborhoods lack transportation equity and have been marginalized by past infrastructure choices. All transportation investments and processes must be led with a racial equity framework, recognizing that racial inequities are deeply ingrained in our processes and often unintentionally perpetuate harm. Leading with racial equity provides the opportunity to proactively integrate racial justice in our decision-making, and ultimately our policies, practices, and institutional culture. Look back to move forward This framework will help SLC learn from the past and move toward a more equitable future. Understand the history of racist mobility policies Analyze how communities benefitted or were harmed Acknowledge impacts on mobility access today and the need to change Identify strategies, investments, and programs needed to avoid displacement and continued disinvestment Create a process to report back on key outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 Strategies Investments Programs Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan142 Organizing for success Cities are complex places. We barely think about our travel experience when all goes well, but behind the scenes there is a lot happening to make our travel experiences smooth, safe, and enjoyable and ensure that the thousands of other people traveling simultaneously have the same experience. An integrated transportation system is the result of careful long-term planning, investment, and day-to-day operations that keep people safe, signals on, systems moving, and goods arriving. Many SLC departments are working to ensure our travel options are safe, reliable, and effective and that the way we allocate our finite street space aligns with our safety, equity, and climate goals. How these departments work together and manage the many needs of our streets is critical to reaching the aspirations set forth in this plan. 143 TRANSPORTATION-FOCUSED All or most transportation functions are in one department that is primarily focused on transportation. Sometimes these departments also have a partner agency (e.g., Engineering, Public Works) that handles certain responsibilities like construction or maintenance.Note: Adapted from NACTO’s “Structured for Success” (2022) TRANSPORTATION-INCLUSIVE All or most transportation functions are in a larger department that is not solely focused on transportation, such as an Engineering Department or a Department of Public Works. TRANSPORTATION-DIFFUSE Transportation functions are spread across multiple departments, none of which is solely focused on transportation. How SLC is structured to deliver Connect SLC Salt Lake City reorganized its Transportation Division in the Department of Community and Neighborhoods to improve capital project delivery. This was in response to a significant increase in transportation funding starting in 2019. As part of the reorganization, the Transportation Division created new work groups to allow for specialization. Previously, project managers had been expected to lead every element of a project from securing funding through construction. The new structure separates out the general planning work group into three groups: a strategic planning and programming team, a project delivery team, and a safety and analytics team. The Division increased staffing and redefined certain staff roles to better utilize several new sources of capital project funding as well as better organize project prioritization and grant writing efforts. Despite this reorganization, SLC’s transportation planning, delivery, and maintenance processes are relatively diffuse compared with agencies that have a consolidated department of transportation. SLC’s diffuse structure has pros and cons. The involvement of multiple departments can include a broader set of City leadership in decision- making and can lead to strong partnerships at the leadership level. However, coordination requires time and resources and it can be challenging to ensure the full lifecycle of a project or program is considered from the outset when multiple leaders are responsible for budgeting and staffing. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan144 Keys to a successful Connect SLC implementation Keys to success How Connect SLC moves us forward What to do next Clear goals Articulates our transportation vision and values and the strategies and actions to move the dial • Create an Action Plan that helps to prioritize what we’re doing first, next, and in the future • Maintain strong Director-level coordination Reliable and recurring funding Sets a strong vision for our transportation system to support asks for new funding, both locally and from Federal and State partners • Sustain and develop reliable local funding sources that can support projects and programs needed to meet the Connect SLC vision • Continue to be opportunistic, seeking grant funds and public-private partnerships to achieve the vision Strong coordination and hand-offs Documents how to integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle • Map project development process/delivery chain • Create a Complete Streets Working Group • Use the Complete Streets process and committee as a delivery tool and approach to ensuring shared commitments are realized • Update project planning and development process to ensure all phases of the project lifecycle are included, all the necessary departments are involved throughout project development, particularly those responsible for operations and maintenance Commitment to evaluation Identifies a set of key metrics to track plan progress • Create an Action Plan that documents how progress will be tracked and communicated to the community • Continue to manage and update the project prioritization process to ensure community goals are being met through the Quality Transportation Improvement Process (QTIP) Manage change Identifies resources, staffing, and partnerships to tackle our most serious challenges • Develop a Vision Zero task force and rapid response team, taking both a structure planning approach and responding immediately to known threats • Develop an East-West Transportation Strategy to address immediate needs and inspire bold action Investment in staff Identifies the need to improve staff understanding of the local community Recommends that staff involved in the decision-making are more representative of the community • Work with local schools, professional organizations, trade unions, and community-based organizations (CBOs) to increase the number of underrepresented populations in vocational professions across the City’s departments • Train planning staff to work with CBOs to understand their unique skillsets and ensure that CBO members have access to resources Strategic communications and community engagement Provides an engagement framework to co- create with community • Partner with the Equity and Inclusion team to update SLC’s Engagement Guide • Tie equitable engagement to staff and leadership decisions through an Equity Working Group or Cabinet Note: Keys to success adapted from NACTO’s “Structured for Success” (2022) 145 Joining with our partners Implementation of Connect SLC will require strong coordination with agency partners, key stakeholders, and community-based organizations. Engage with our communities Partner with neighborhoods and Recognized Community Organizations to identify participants for the Equity Working Group. • Equity and Inclusion Team of Salt Lake City • Community Outreach Team of Salt Lake City • Neighborhood and Community Organizations –Westside Coalition –Community Councils of SLC –NeighborWorks Salt Lake City –All community-based organizations representing the people of SLC Improve health and safety Partner with law enforcement and other public health and safety divisions and organizations to achieve Vision Zero goals. • Law enforcement • Salt Lake County Health Department • SLC Police Pioneer Bike Squad • SLC Unified School District • SLC schools, colleges, and universities • Wasatch Front Regional Council Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan146 Provide transportation options and services Partner with transportation options service providers to improve awareness of options and increase the number of people biking, walking, and taking transit for more trips. • UTA • GREENbike • UDOT TravelWise Manage the right of way Partner with right-of-way operators and the divisions that manage public land and utilities to ensure Complete Streets implementation is seamless and safe connections are made. • SLC Public Utilities Department • SLC Public Lands Department • UDOT • Freight rail operators Improve our public spaces Partner with our economic development and tourism partners to enhance our public spaces and attract equitable development. • Department of Economic Development • Downtown Alliance • SLC Redevelopment Agency • SLC Arts Council • Visit Salt Lake DOWNTOWN 147 Measuring our progress Connect SLC sets a vision for Salt Lake City’s transportation future. But how will we know if we’re making progress to achieve the vision? This section outlines the performance measures for Connect SLC—organized by our values outlined in Chapter 4—to help track our progress. Our values Our Key Moves Our measure Our metric Target Equity • Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement Design engagement to foster co-creation • Dollars paid to community-based organizations and community members • Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Public Engagement Expanded engagement to underserved populations to prioritize marginalized voices • Comparison of demographic data for survey and in-person outreach events compared to city-wide demographics • Geographical distribution of in-person events and survey responses N/A • Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Improved safety for people living and working in Westside neighborhoods • Number of safe, protected crossings for all modes between 2100 S and 600 N • Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Improved awareness of transportation options • Change in awareness of transportation options (from biennial transportation survey) Equity Our transportation system is accessible and welcoming to people with diverse abilities, identities, lived experiences, and language skills. Investments are made to counteract historic and current disparities. Health and Safety Our transportation system keeps people safe when they walk, use a wheelchair or other device, bicycle, take transit, and drive. Streets are designed to prevent collisions and support personal health. Reliable Options Salt Lake City residents, employees, and visitors have access to a variety of travel options that consistently get them to the places they want to go. Affordability People can easily access transportation options that fit their budget and payment methods. Sustainability Our transportation system incorporates a range of design solutions, technologies, and mobility options to aggressively reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions caused by vehicle use. Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan148 Our values Our Key Moves Our measure Our metric Target Health and Safety • Key Move 2: Zero Traffic Deaths • Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Eliminate traffic-related fatalities and reduce serious injuries from traffic collisions • Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-injury locations such as in the Westside neighborhoods) • Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc.) • Change in prevailing vehicle speeds on key corridors representing each of the City’s street typologies • Key Move 3: Great Networks for Active Mobility Increase the amount of safe facilities for people walking and biking • Number of new or enhanced pedestrian crossings • Access to all ages and abilities bicycle facilities (e.g., population within ¼ mile) • Percent of people walking and bicycling for all types of trips • Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods Improve the transit rider experience • Percentage of stops in SLC upgraded with amenities Reliable Options • Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods • Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Increase the number of transportation options people have available • Percent of people who take transit for all types of trips (from biennial transportation survey) • Percent of parking revenue reinvested in mobility options • Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods • Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Enhance reliability of our transportation system • Person hours of delay • Number of TSP and bus lane treatments installed per year • Transit rider satisfaction survey results (from UTA onboard survey) • Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Improved reliability to the Westside neighborhoods • Travel time reliability east to west compared to north to south Affordability • Key Move 4: Transit- Friendly Neighborhoods • Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide Decrease the percent of income spent on transportation • Percent of income spent on transportation (H+T Index) Sustainability • Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options Reduction in transportation- related emissions • Reduction in VMT 149 Endnotes 1 The American Growth Project, UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School. 2022’s Fastest Growing U.S. Cities, Ranked. https://kenaninstitute. unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/american-growth-project- 10122022r.pdf 2 Utah Governor’s Office of Management and Budget Municipal Population Projections. https://mountainland.org/img/Data/ Projections/GOMBSmallAreaProjections.pdf 3 American Lung Association. State of the Air 2022. https://www.lung. org/getmedia/74b3d3d3-88d1-4335-95d8-c4e47d0282c1/sota- 2022 4 Clean the Air Challenge. https://cleartheairchallenge.org/wp- content/uploads/5791_CTAC_FactSheetRevise.pdf 5 Utah Department of Transportation Zero Fatalities. Up-to-date Fatality and Serious Injury Data (2023). https://zerofatalities.com/ statistics/ 6 Salt Lake City GIS Open Data Portal. 7 US Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2021). 8 UTA February 2020 Ridership Data. Weekday Mode-Level Boardings. 9 Salt Lake City Thriving in Place Strategy Website (2023). https://www. thrivinginplaceslc.org/ 10 Tefft, Brian, ‘Impact speed and a pedestrian’s risk of severe injury or death,’ Accident Prevention and Analysis (2013). 11 Salt Lake City Resident Survey (2021). http://slcdocs.com/ims/ Survey2021.pdf 12 Housing and Transportation Index, Salt Lake City, Utah. https:// htaindex.cnt.org/fact-sheets/?lat=40.75962&lng=-111.886798&focu s=place&gid=26322#fs 13 US Census Bureau. American Community Survey (2021). 14 UTA Free Fare February Final Report (April 2022). 15 Environmental Research, Volume 174, July 2019. Prenatal and early life exposures to ambient air pollution and development. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/ S0013935119301987 Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan150 151 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: April 2, 2024 RE:Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00169 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: April 2, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 7, 2024 ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposal that would implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area plan (adopted by the council in October 2022), and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: •Zoning Map Amendments would rezone properties to align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. •Zoning Text Amendments would establish a new zone, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) Zoning District and would rezone some properties within Ballpark Station Area to MU-8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in support of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council. Sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone are currently being processed under a separate petition, PLNPCM2023-00959. It has been transmitted to the Council office and will be considered concurrent with these zoning petitions. Page | 2 Zoning Maps The existing and proposed zoning maps are on page 2 of the transmittal letter. They are provided below for quick access. Existing Zoning Map Proposed Zoning Map ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Potential addition of uses to the final ordinance •The transmittal letter includes a recommendation from planning staff for the Council to consider including the uses listed below as permitted in the land use table for the MU-8 zoning district. These recommendations came up after the Planning Commission reviewed and made their recommendation. o Amphitheater Formal o Amphitheater Informal o Health and Fitness Facility o Community Recreation Center o Plaza o Stadium The Council could choose to include these in the final ordinance without the petition going back to the Planning Commission because the potential changes are considered to be within the scope of the petition. If adopted, these uses would be added to the MU-8 zoning district and would be permitted wherever the MU-8 is located throughout the city. Page | 3 Properties with no Recommended Zoning Changes Not all parcels within the study area are being proposed to be rezoned. The following properties are proposed to stay with their existing zoning: o Most PL Public Lands (One PL parcel, currently a school, is proposed to be rezoned to MU-8) o RMF-35 Multifamily Residential zoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North Parking lot (This will be considered in a second phase to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process.) o R-1-5000 Single Family Residential zone north of Merrimac Avenue o OS Open Space and R-MU Residential Mixed-Use zoning in the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. Creation of the Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) district Pages 6-8 of the Planning Commission staff report outline the following key components of the proposed MU-8 zoning district. Also, please see Attachment A to this report. It includes the MU-8 development standards proposed by Planning Staff. o The proposed MU-8 zone is a form based mixed use district which allows a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. o The purpose of the district is to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. o The regulations allow buildings up to eight stories in height with focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. o The proposed development and design standards address ground floor activation, building form, massing, scale, and building placement. o The standards aim to facilitate a pedestrian friendly, engaging experience and mitigate height and density impacts on adjacent properties and properties located in low density zones. o Most of the properties proposed to be rezoned to MU-8 are currently zoned with a commercial designation. One parcel that is currently zoned PL is proposed to be rezoned to MU-8 as well. o The current Bees Stadium and the Parking lot to the north are not proposed to be zoned MU-8 in order to give the City maximum flexibility if/when the Ballpark Next process is completed. South State Street Corridor Overlay Zoning vs MU-8 Some of the properties in the project area are also in the South State Street Corridor Overlay , SSSC. They are zoned Public Lands and Commercial Corridor. Planning Staff is proposing to rezone properties in the overlay zone to the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use District 8 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 and keep some of those properties out of the SSSC overlay because the standards are less restrictive than the design standards of the MU-8 and FB-UN2 zoning districts. (Planning Commission Staff Report, Pages 13-14) Policy Questions •Does the Council support including the additional uses proposed by Planning staff as permitted in the MU-8 zoning district in the final ordinance? •Does the Council wish to ask the Administration for more information on why the city owned property that includes the baseball stadium and parking lot are proposed to stay as PL? Page | 4 Future Land Use Area Boundaries This proposal considers zoning amendments for properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan: 1. Heart of the Neighborhood 2. Main Street Area 3. State Street Area 4. Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area The key zoning map changes are summarized in the tables below. Please see the planning commission staff report for more details. 1. Heart of the Neighborhood (Planning Commission staff report pages 5-10) 2. Main Street & State Street Areas (Planning Commission staff report pages 11-14) 3. Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area (Planning Commission staff report pages 15-16) Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Salt Lake City Council – April 2, 2024 PLNPCM2023-00169 SLC BALLPARK STATION AREA // REZONES Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Establish Zoning Districts that align with the plan ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT Establish a new zone, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Recommended approval REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Heart of the Neighborhood •Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area •Main Street & State Street PROJECT AREA & State Street Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Commercial Corridor (CC) •General Commercial (CG) •Commercial Neighborhood (CN) •Moderate Density Multifamily Residential (RMF-35) •Residential Business (RB) •Residential Mixed Use (R-MU) •Public Lands (PL) •Open Space (OS) EXISTING ZONING Salt Lake City // Planning Division REZONES: •Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) •Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1 (FB- UN1) •Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 (FB- UN2) •Public Land (PL) – Future Library Site •MU-8 & FB-UN2 exempt from SSSC Overlay PRESERVED ZONES: •PL & RMF-35 – Ballpark Properties •R-1-5000 •R-MU & OS – Jefferson Park PROPOSED ZONING Salt Lake City // Planning Division PROPOSED LOCATIONS •Heart of the Neighborhood •Main Street & State Street OVERVIEW •High density form based mixed use zone •Eight stories in height •Uses: Residential, office, commercial/retail services, parks, community facilities, education/institutional MU-8 ZONE Salt Lake City // Planning Division FORMS ESTABLISHED •Row House •Multi-family/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use (Other) DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS Height •Row House: 40 FT •Other: 50 FT, 90 FT Authorized through Design Review MU-8 STANDARDS Salt Lake City // Planning Division OPEN SPACE AREA •Row House: 25% of footprint •Other: 20% of lot area DESIGN REQUIREMENTS •Min. of 20% - vegetation •1 area min. dimension of 15’ by 15’ •Area over 500 SF – 1 usable element MU-8 OPEN SPACE Salt Lake City // Planning Division SIDEWALK WIDTH •Min. 10 FT GROUND FLOOR USE •Other: 80% of street facing facades •Retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries theaters or performing art facilities MU-8 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning MU-8 DESIGN STANDARDS •Entry Feature •Upper-Level Façade Step Back Adjacent to lower density zones •Durable Ground Floor Building Materials: 70% •Durable Upper Floor Building Materials: 50% •Ground Floor Glass: 60% •Upper Floor Glass: 15% •Building Entrance: 1 building entrance every 40 FT •Max. Length of a Street Facing Façade: 200 FT •Blank Wall: Max. Length of a blank wall 30 FT •Lighting Exterior •Lighting Parking Lot •Screening of mechanical equipment •Screening of service areas •Ground Floor Residential Entrance •Parking garage or structures •Tree Canopy Coverage: 66% •Min. Vegetation Standards •Street Trees •Minimize Curb Cuts •Overhead Cover •Streetscape Landscaping •Height Transitions Between Adjacent Buildings Salt Lake City // Planning Division PROPOSED LOCATIONS •Heart of the Neighborhood •Jefferson Park Mixed Use OVERVIEW •Small scale residential: Urban House, Two-Family, Cottage, Row House •Height: 30 FT •Open Space: 10% min. •Subject to design standards FB-UN1 Salt Lake City // Planning Division PROPOSED LOCATIONS •Heart of the Neighborhood •Jefferson Park Mixed Use OVERVIEW •Mix of uses •Forms: Cottage, Row House & Other •Height: 50 FT •Open Space: Vary by form •Subject to open space & site/building design standards FB-UN2 Salt Lake City // Planning Division CONTEXT AREAS •Transit: MU-8 & FB-UN2 •Zones surrounding mass transit •Minimal parking required •Neighborhood: FB-UN1 •1 space per DU •Proposal reduces parking required PARKING Salt Lake City // Planning Division •Affordable Housing Incentives •Adopted in Dec. •FB-UN1: Additional ½ story up to 30 FT •FB-UN2: Additional story •Proposed MU-8: 2 additional stories & Admin. Design Review •Provide additional height/density identified in the plan. AHI Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning BALLPARK PROPERTIES 2024 DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Use Considerations •Amphitheater Formal and Informal •Health and Fitness Facility •Community Recreation Center •Plaza •Stadium BALLPARK NEXT Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PUBLIC PROCESS June 2023 Input period began July-Oct. 2023 Proposal Modifications Oct. 2023 Planning Commission Recommendation Salt Lake City // Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION •Recommended approval of the zoning map and zoning text amendments. RECOMMENDATION Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Brooke Olson // Principal Planner Brooke.olson@slcgov.com 801-535-7118 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: February 20, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: SLC Ballpark Station Area - Rezones STAFF CONTACT: Booke Olson, Principal Planner brooke.olson@slcgov.com, 801-535-7118 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve the zoning map and zoning text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. The City is proposing rachel otto (Feb 27, 2024 08:54 MST)02/27/2024 02/27/2024 associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station Area. Existing Zoning The project area is predominately zoned a variety of commercial and moderate density, multifamily residential zoning districts. The majority of the existing zoning districts within the project area do not provide the development standards, density, and land uses specified in the plan. Proposed Zoning The City is proposing three new zoning districts in the area to align with the plan, including the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. Additionally, the City is Proposed Zoning Map Existing Zoning Map proposing to exempt the MU-8 and FB-UN2 zones from the SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay zone which is mapped along the eastern boundary of the project area. Two properties located at 105 W 1400 S and 1410 S West Temple are owned by Salt Lake City Public Library. The properties are proposed to be rezoned from RMF-35 Multifamily Residential to PL Public Lands to accommodate the future development of a public library. Preserved Zoning The City is proposing to preserve the existing PL Public Lands and RMF-35 Multifamily Residential zoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North Parking lot, which will be considered in a second phase to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. The City is also proposing to preserve an R-1-5000 Single Family Residential zone north of Merrimac Avenue, the OS Open Space and R-MU Residential Mixed Use zoning in the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. Proposed MU-8 Zone The proposed MU-8 zone is a high density form based mixed use district which allows buildings up to eight stories in height and a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The zone aims to facilitate the creation of quality, high density, pedestrian oriented developments. The standards of the zone are form based and vary for each building form established in the zone including row houses, multifamily residential, storefront, and vertical mixed use. The standards are also intended to mitigate height and density impacts on adjacent properties, and properties located in low density zones. Staff presented the proposal at a Planning Commission work session meeting on October 11, 2023. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 25, 2023, voted, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. It should be noted sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone are currently being processed under a separate petition, PLNPCM2023-00959. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed sign regulations on January 24, 2024 and recommended approval to the City Council. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Council Office. Since petitions PLNPCM2023-00169 and PLNPCM2023-00959 are associated with creating regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone, the council may want to consider scheduling the briefings and public hearing for both petitions simultaneously if transmitted to Council Staff within similar timeframes. Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles The Ballpark Next community visioning process was initiated to establish guiding principles for the future use and development of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties. The draft Guiding Principles were published in January 2024 and will provide direction for decision making throughout the development process. As mentioned, the rezoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties will be considered in a second phase of this proposal to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. However, if there is a desire to implement the proposed MU-8 zone on either of the properties the Council should consider a modification to the proposed ordinance to allow the following land uses in the MU-8 zone which were identified in the Ballpark Next process. These uses were not specifically identified as permitted uses in the proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission but the Council may desire to add them to the proposed ordinance now. • Amphitheater Formal • Amphitheater Informal • Health and Fitness Facility • Community Recreation Center • Plaza • Stadium PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the application was initiated: • April 2023 - An informational webpage posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. The webpage is regularly updated with new information as necessary. • June 2, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. • June 2, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. • July 13, 2023 – Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. • September 7, 2023 – Planning Staff modified the proposal based on the public input received and presented the proposal modifications at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal. • September 8, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. • September 8, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. • October 16, 2023 - Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. • October 25, 2023 – Planning Commission held a public hearing. Four members of the public spoke and the Ballpark Community Council submitted a letter. Several public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment D of the staff report. Initial modifications were made to the draft proposal in July through October 2023 in response to public comments received. A summary of the proposal modifications in response to public comments is provided in Attachment E of the Staff Report. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Memo of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) d) PC Agenda of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) e) PC Minutes of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) f) Planning Commission Staff Report of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Petition Initiation Request 5) Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles 6) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 7) Mailing List ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED 7. MAILING LIST 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels situated in the Ballpark Station Area Plan to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels in the boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area Plan as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 on an application submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and 2 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR 3 ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ballpark Station Area Rezonesv2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney February 19, 2024 4 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel Maps and Table Existing Zoning Map 5 Proposed Zoning Map PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-408-006-0000 1039 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-007-0000 1049 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-008-0000 1055 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-009-0000 175 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-010-0000 171 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-011-0000 165 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-012-0000 151 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-013-0000 1022 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-014-0000 1032 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-015-0000 1036 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-016-0000 1046 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-017-0000 1052 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-018-0000 1056 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-019-0000 1058 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-024-0000 1062 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-003-0000 129 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-004-0000 127 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-005-0000 111 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-006-0000 1025 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-007-0000 1035 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-008-0000 1043 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-011-0000 1051 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-016-0000 134 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-017-0000 128 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-018-0000 124 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-020-0000 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-021-0000 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-022-0000 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-023-0000 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-026-0000 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-031-0000 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-033-0000 1047 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-035-0000 1061 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-037-0000 133 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-038-0000 1001 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-040-0000 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-041-0000 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-042-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-043-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-044-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-003-0000 1091 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-004-0000 1095 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-009-0000 175 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-010-0000 167 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-011-0000 163 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-012-0000 159 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-013-0000 149 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-014-0000 147 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-015-0000 137 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-016-0000 135 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-029-0000 1089 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-030-0000 1085 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-031-0000 185 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-001-0000 1121 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-002-0000 1127 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-003-0000 1131 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-004-0000 169 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-005-0000 163 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-006-0000 157 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-007-0000 151 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-008-0000 145 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-009-0000 139 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-013-0000 1143 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-014-0000 182 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-015-0000 178 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-016-0000 172 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-017-0000 170 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-018-0000 166 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-019-0000 160 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-020-0000 156 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-429-021-0000 152 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-022-0000 138 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-023-0000 134 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-024-0000 132 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-025-0000 128 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-026-0000 122 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-433-001-0000 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-002-0000 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-003-0000 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-004-0000 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-005-0000 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-006-0000 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-007-0000 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-008-0000 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-009-0000 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-010-0000 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-011-0000 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-012-0000 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-013-0000 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-014-0000 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-015-0000 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-016-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-017-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-001-0000 121 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-002-0000 123 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-003-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-004-0000 127 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-005-0000 129 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-006-0000 131 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-007-0000 133 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-008-0000 135 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-009-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-001-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-002-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-003-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-004-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-005-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-006-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-007-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-008-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-009-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-010-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-011-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-012-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-013-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-001-0000 1167 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-002-0000 179 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-003-0000 175 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-004-0000 173 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-005-0000 165 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-006-0000 159 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-009-0000 147 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-010-0000 141 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-011-0000 137 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-012-0000 133 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-013-0000 129 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-014-0000 125 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-015-0000 121 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-016-0000 182 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-017-0000 178 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-018-0000 174 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-019-0000 170 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-020-0000 164 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-021-0000 160 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-022-0000 156 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-023-0000 150 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-024-0000 146 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-025-0000 142 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-026-0000 140 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-027-0000 132 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-476-028-0000 130 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-029-0000 126 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-030-0000 122 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-031-0000 118 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-032-0000 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-033-0000 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-034-0000 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-035-0000 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-036-0000 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-037-0000 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-038-0000 155 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-039-0000 151 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-002-0000 155 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-003-0000 125 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-004-0000 121 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-005-0000 119 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-006-0000 117 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-007-0000 115 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-008-0000 111 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-009-0000 105 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-010-0000 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-011-0000 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-012-0000 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-013-0000 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-12-477-014-0000 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-13-229-003-0000 105 W 1400 S RMF-35 PL 15-13-229-004-0000 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 PL 15-12-481-008-0000 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-009-0000 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-010-0000 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-011-0000 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-004-0000 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-005-0000 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-006-0000 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-007-0000 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-009-0000 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-228-006-0000 1414 S JEFFERSON ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-232-025-0000 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-12-479-018-0000 1234 S MAIN ST PL MU-8 15-12-477-019-0000 114 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-020-0000 1285 S RICHARDS ST CN MU-8 15-12-479-021-0000 34 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-022-0000 1270 S MAIN ST CN MU-8 15-12-481-007-0000 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST CN MU-8 15-12-477-018-0000 120 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-477-026-0000 180 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-480-001-0000 1338 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-001-0000 135 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-481-002-0000 1309 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-003-0000 1317 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-004-0000 1321 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-005-0000 1333 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-001-0000 1340 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-005-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-211-009-0000 150 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-211-010-0000 1376 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-011-0000 1380 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-012-0000 1386 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-013-0000 1390 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-226-007-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-227-001-0000 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE CG MU-8 15-13-227-002-0000 1385 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-227-008-0000 124 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-228-002-0000 1404 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-228-003-0000 1410 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-002-0000 1425 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-006-0000 119 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-229-007-0000 1411 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-430-001-0000 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-430-024-0000 36 W FREMONT AVE CC FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-430-028-0000 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-001-0000 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-002-0000 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-010-0000 1116 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-014-0000 60 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-015-0000 56 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-017-0000 1152 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-020-0000 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-432-009-0000 1155 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-010-0000 1159 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-011-0000 1165 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-012-0000 1171 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-016-0000 1150 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-017-0000 1160 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-018-0000 1164 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-019-0000 1172 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-001-0000 1185 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-010-0000 1186 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-13-231-022-0000 1400 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-023-0000 1414 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-024-0000 1430 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-028-0000 1380 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-305-010-0000 1175 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-018-0000 1160 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-019-0000 9 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-020-0000 17 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-021-0000 19 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-025-0000 1147 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-003-0000 1155 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-004-0000 1167 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-008-0000 1162 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-009-0000 33 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-010-0000 37 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-011-0000 41 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-352-001-0000 1185 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-011-0000 1222 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-016-0000 1207 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-001-0000 50 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-002-0000 58 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-003-0000 1190 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-004-0000 1207 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-005-0000 1212 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-006-0000 1209 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-007-0000 1213 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-008-0000 1225 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-019-0000 1241 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-354-013-0000 1325 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-014-0000 28 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-015-0000 1345 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-017-0000 1337 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-001-0000 40 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-002-0000 60 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-003-0000 1325 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-004-0000 1331 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-005-0000 1335 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-006-0000 1345 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-001-0000 1357 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-002-0000 1361 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-003-0000 1375 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-004-0000 1381 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-005-0000 1401 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-006-0000 1405 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-007-0000 1415 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-008-0000 1433 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-009-0000 1364 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-010-0000 1376 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-011-0000 1382 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-012-0000 1388 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-015-0000 1398 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-016-0000 1406 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 16-18-101-017-0000 1412 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-018-0000 1420 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-019-0000 1448 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-020-0000 23 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-021-0000 25 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-022-0000 29 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-023-0000 33 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-024-0000 1392 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-001-0000 1359 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-003-0000 1363 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-004-0000 1379 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-005-0000 1383 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-006-0000 1389 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-007-0000 1393 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-008-0000 1397 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-009-0000 1401 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-010-0000 1405 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-028-0000 1411 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-029-0000 1421 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-030-0000 1356 S STATE ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-032-0000 59 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. _____ of 2024 2 3 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the 4 Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) 5 6 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 7 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. 8 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 9 public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 10 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 11 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 12 establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 13 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition 14 No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and 15 WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 16 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 17 petition; and 18 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 19 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 21 22 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 23 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and 24 Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 25 2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the 26 zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 27 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: 28 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 29 districts: 30 31 Section Reference District Name A. Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B. Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict B. C. Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District B D. Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District D E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District E F. Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District F G. Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District G H. Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District H I. Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose 33 SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of 34 the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 35 new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: 36 CHAPTER 21A.25 37 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 38 39 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS 40 41 A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use 42 districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in 43 the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, 44 increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by 45 increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The 46 regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward 47 public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. 48 49 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based 50 on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 51 5 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 52 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed 53 subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and 54 any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that 55 may be found in this title. 56 57 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a 58 nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse 59 matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 60 61 21A.25.020: Reserved 62 63 21A.25.030: Reserved 64 65 21A.25.040: Reserved 66 67 21A.25.050: Reserved 68 69 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT 70 71 A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is 72 to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight 73 stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in 74 or near the subdistrict. 75 76 B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated 77 regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 78 79 1. Row House Building Form Standards: 80 a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: 81 (i). 1300 South 82 (ii). West Temple 83 (iii). Main Street 84 85 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 86 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 87 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form 88 Standards: 89 (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: 90 (i). 1300 South 91 (ii). West Temple 92 (iii). Main Street 93 94 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 95 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 96 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 97 98 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this 99 subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following 100 standards: 101 102 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, 103 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living 104 spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space 105 area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot 106 landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area 107 requirement. 108 109 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ 110 by 15’. 111 112 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover 113 at least 50% of the open space area. 114 115 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one 116 useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. 117 118 a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; 119 b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space 120 area; 121 c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to 122 provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not 123 limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport 124 court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; 125 d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 126 127 D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are 128 listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable 129 parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. 130 131 132 TABLE 21A.25.060.D 133 DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 134 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 135 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in 136 addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. 137 138 TABLE 21A.25.060.E 139 140 141 F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve 142 construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any 143 specific building form regulation. 144 145 G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in 146 this subdistrict. 147 148 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 149 1. The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2. The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 150 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 151 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 152 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 153 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 154 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 155 8. 21A.46 Signs 156 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 157 158 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That 159 Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 160 Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 161 A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 162 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 163 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that 164 they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable 165 requirements of this title. 166 167 168 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That 169 Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 170 Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 171 B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 172 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 173 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they 174 are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 175 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. 176 177 SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That 178 Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to 179 include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based 180 Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 181 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED 182 MIXED USE DISTRICTS 183 11 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 184 Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted 185 Use Permitted and Conditional Uses By District MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor) P Bar establishment (outdoor) P Brewpub (indoor) P1 Brewpub (outdoor) P1 Tavern (indoor) P1 Tavern (outdoor) C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental) P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 12 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large) P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small) P Congregate care facility (large) P Congregate care facility (small) P Group home (large) P Group home (small) P Multi-family P Residential support (large) P Residential support (small) P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor) P Recreation (outdoor) P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor) P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) 186 Qualifying provisions: 187 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related 188 Establishments", of this title. 189 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 190 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 191 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or 192 radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 193 administrative rules. 194 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this 195 title. 196 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 197 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 198 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a 199 property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building 200 demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 201 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar 202 establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of 203 spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 204 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. 205 206 207 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That 208 Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 209 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 210 new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: 211 G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form 212 Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 213 214 15 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That 215 Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With 216 Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as 217 follows. 218 C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning 219 districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. 220 221 TABLE 21A.36.020.C 222 HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS 223 Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 224 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties 225 and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 226 16 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 227 228 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That 229 Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards 230 Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is 231 amended to read and appear as follows: 232 b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 233 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban 234 Neighborhood), FB-MU11UN3 (Form Based Urban NeighborhoodMixed Use 11 235 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-236 SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House 237 Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this 238 section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. 239 240 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 241 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each 242 Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H 243 while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: 244 H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts 245 246 Standard (Code Section) District MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 17 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 Notes: 264 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the 265 following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to 266 the building type being allowed in the zone. 267 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 268 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of 269 the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 270 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall 271 not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. 272 273 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. 274 That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General 275 Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and 276 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 277 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.265 through 21A.34 of this title: form based 278 mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway 279 districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): 280 a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable 281 materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing 282 in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven 283 chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, 284 metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or 285 combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of 286 similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon 287 approval by the zZoning aAdministrator through an administrative 288 interpretation application. 289 b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be 290 constructed of or contain: 291 (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. 292 (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing 293 such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or 294 plywood. 295 296 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That 297 Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 298 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is 299 amended to read and appear as follows: 300 20 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU Twin home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Two-family 21 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Nursing care facility Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Group home 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Residential support Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 301 302 303 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 23 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Crematorium 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community recreation center Jail Government facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Social service mission and charity dining hall Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Meeting hall membership organization Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas 24 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park See Table Note B No Maximum Ambulance service Cemetery No Minimum Plazas Park Open space Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. K-12 private Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity K-12 public 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Dance/music studio 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental) 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Hospital, including accessory lodging facility Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 304 305 306 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger Poultry farm or processing plant 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse Agricultural use No Minimum Community garden Farmer’s market 27 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Theater, live performance Theater, movie Amphitheater See Table Note B Athletic Field Stadium Tennis court (principal use) 2 spaces per court No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Bowling 2 spaces per lane Convention center 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium Health and fitness facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Performing arts production facility Reception center 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Recreation (indoor) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre) 1 space per designated camping or RV spot No Maximum Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor) See Table Note B Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Restaurant Tavern Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 29 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Department Fashion oriented development 30 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Flea market (indoor) Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 32 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Impound lot 33 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 307 308 309 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 TRANSPORTATION USES 34 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Airport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Heliport Bus line station/terminal No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking Railroad, repair shop 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum No Maximum Truck freight terminal Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per Bakery, commercial 35 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication Laundry, commercial 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing 36 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Printing plant Processing center (indoor) Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station No minimum Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility No minimum No maximum Building materials distribution Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage No minimum No minimum No maximum Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution 37 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution No Minimum No Maximum Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure No Minimum No Maximum Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station 38 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Living quarter for caretaker or security guard Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory No Maximum Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory 39 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 310 311 40 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That 312 Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 313 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is 314 amended to read and appear as follows:315 41 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 316 317 318 319 320 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft. 1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft. 1 per 8,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 42 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That 322 Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 323 Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and 324 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 325 43 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 326 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 6 ft. 0 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 0 ft. RMF-30 N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 15 ft. M-2 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. FP 20 ft. 6 ft. 0 ft. 44 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 30 ft. 10 ft. PL 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district PL-2 20 ft. RP 30 ft. 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-3 D-4 See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. G-MU 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB-SC N MU-8 TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 327 328 46 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That 329 Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 330 Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 331 and appear as follows: 332 47 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 333 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 334 48 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 335 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 336 first publication. 337 338 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. 339 340 341 ______________________________ 342 CHAIRPERSON 343 344 ATTEST: 345 346 ______________________________ 347 CITY RECORDER 348 349 350 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 351 352 353 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 354 355 356 ______________________________ 357 MAYOR 358 359 ______________________________ 360 CITY RECORDER 361 362 (SEAL) 363 364 Bill No. ________ of 2024. 365 Published: ______________. 366 367 368 Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (legislative)v2 369 370 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning districts: Section Reference District Name A. Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B. Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict C. Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District D. Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District F. Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District G. Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District H. Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District I. Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: CHAPTER 21A.25 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 21A.25.020: Reserved 21A.25.030: Reserved 21A.25.040: Reserved 21A.25.050: Reserved 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in or near the subdistrict. B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 1. Row House Building Form Standards: a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following standards: 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover at least 50% of the open space area. 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; and/or d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. TABLE 21A.25.060.D DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. TABLE 21A.25.060.E F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any specific building form regulation. G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in this subdistrict. 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 1. The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2. The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8. 21A.46 Signs 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted Use Permitted and Conditional Uses By District MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor) P Bar establishment (outdoor) P Brewpub (indoor) P1 Brewpub (outdoor) P1 Tavern (indoor) P1 Tavern (outdoor) C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental) P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 12 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large) P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small) P Congregate care facility (large) P Congregate care facility (small) P Group home (large) P Group home (small) P Multi-family P Residential support (large) P Residential support (small) P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P 13 Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P 5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor) P Recreation (outdoor) P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor) P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P 14 Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 15 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows. C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. TABLE 21A.36.020.C HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 16 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-MU11 (Form Based Mixed Use 11 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts Standard (Code Section) District MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 17 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) 18 Notes: 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to the building type being allowed in the zone. 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.25 through 21A.34 of this title: form based mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon approval by the zoning administrator through an administrative interpretation application. b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be constructed of or contain: (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or plywood. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU Twin home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Two-family 21 Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Nursing care facility Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Group home 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Residential support Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum 22 Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 23 Crematorium 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community recreation center Jail Government facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Social service mission and charity dining hall Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Meeting hall membership organization Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas 24 Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park See Table Note B No Maximum Ambulance service Cemetery No Minimum Plazas Park Open space Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. K-12 private Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity K-12 public 25 Dance/music studio 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental) 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Hospital, including accessory lodging facility Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger Poultry farm or processing plant 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse Agricultural use No Minimum Community garden Farmer’s market 27 Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Theater, live performance Theater, movie Amphitheater See Table Note B Athletic Field Stadium Tennis court (principal use) 2 spaces per court No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Bowling 2 spaces per lane Convention center 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium Health and fitness facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Performing arts production facility Reception center 28 Recreation (indoor) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre) 1 space per designated camping or RV spot No Maximum Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor) See Table Note B Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Restaurant Tavern Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Department Fashion oriented development 30 Flea market (indoor) Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Impound lot 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Heliport 34 Bus line station/terminal No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking Railroad, repair shop 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum No Maximum Truck freight terminal Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Bakery, commercial 35 Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication Laundry, commercial 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) 36 Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station No minimum Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility No minimum No maximum Building materials distribution Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage No minimum No minimum No maximum Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution No Minimum No Maximum Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure No Minimum No Maximum Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Living quarter for caretaker or security guard Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory No Maximum Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory 39 Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 40 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 41 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft. 1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft. 1 per 8,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 42 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 43 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 6 ft. 0 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 0 ft. RMF-30 N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 15 ft. M-2 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. FP 20 ft. 6 ft. 0 ft. 44 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 30 ft. 10 ft. PL 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district PL-2 20 ft. RP 30 ft. 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-3 D-4 See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. G-MU 45 FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC N MU-8 TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 46 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 47 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 48 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (final)v2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney February 19, 2024 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00169 Nov. 2021 Salt Lake City initiated the creation of a small area plan within the Ballpark Neighborhood, The Ballpark Station Area Plan. Oct. 18 2022 The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by Salt Lake City Council. Mar. 1, 2023 Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning map and zoning text amendment petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and rezone properties within the boundaries of the plan. Mar. 22, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00169 assigned to Brooke Olson, Principal Planner. Apr. 2023 An informational webpage was posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. Apr. – Jun. 2023 Zoning map and text amendment proposal was refined and finalized. Jun. 2, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Jul. 13, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. Jul. – Sept. 2023 Significant modifications were made to the proposal in response to public input received. Sept. 7, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal modifications at a Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the modified proposal. Sept. 8, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. Oct. 11, 2023 Staff presented the petition at a Planning Commission work session meeting to gather feedback, identify key issues, and answer questions in anticipation of a future public hearing. Oct. 13, 2023 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing is sent to property owners and occupants within 300 ft of the subject properties. Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing property signs are also posted in the project boundary. Oct. 16, 2023 Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director Oct. 25, 2023 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the petition and voted to recommend the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. Nov. 21, 2023 Draft ordinances requested from the City Attorney’s Office. Nov. 29, 2023 The Planning Commission ratifies the minutes for their meeting on October 25, 2023. Jan. 29, 2024 Draft ordinances received from the City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00169– Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Zoning District. The City is proposing associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station area, within a portion of the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street and State Street Areas. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Brooke Olson at 801-535-7118 or via e-mail at brooke.olson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00169. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Ballpark NEXT Vision Statement Guiding Principles 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED October 25, 2023 Hello Planning Commissioners, My name is Amy J. Hawkins, and I serve as Chair of the Ballpark Community Council. Thank you for your attention this evening during a lengthily virtual meeting. My additional thanks are plentiful and at the end of this comment. We only have three out of five Ballpark Community Council board positions filled as we come up to an election next week, so I hesitate to say that these comments are the official position of the board. However, they are informed by extensive public engagement sessions with the Ballpark Community Council. My remarks tonight are fundamental: we understand that fixed rail goes through our neighborhood. We hope to capitalize on the opportunities it provides for economic development, best practices in urban planning, and the ability for folks to live in what’s almost a “15-minute neighborhood”, without displacing our committed residents and businesses, allowing folks the opportunity to age in place, without sacrificing affordability or community safety. These desires sound completely reasonable to residents and yet aren’t an easy ask in one of the most rapidly developing neighborhoods in one of the most actively growing metropolitan areas in the United States. Residents are concerned about plans to add substantial housing density when 1) we are already short on public land and spaces to recreate to support residents’ health, and 2) we’re concerned about plans for rezoning that eliminate setbacks. I know some view setbacks as a way to make housing unnecessarily more expensive, but in a community that already has serious disparities in our neighborhood’s urban tree canopy, in health outcomes, and a demonstrable heat island effect, removing setbacks removes our remaining opportunities to grow our urban tree canopy and protect our future residents. Planning Commissioners, please view setbacks through the lens of what needs to happen to prevent our heat island effect from becoming worse in a neighborhood that is still hurting from the effects of redlining and the “People’s Freeway”—Interstate 15, the 9th South offramp, and State Street, that powerfully disconnect us from our neighbors. We realize that the guiding principles for the Ballpark NEXT project may direct future planners to meet some of these concerns, but since that project is now completely disconnected from this Ballpark rezone proposal, we can’t build in those expectations for the Ballpark space when the committee may choose to go in a completely different direction. Over and over, I heard from fellow residents that we want to avoid recreating the problems of 400 South in this new MU-8 zone in Ballpark. Do these new MU-8 ground floor activation requirements do enough to avoid the problems of 400 South? Are there special considerations to preserve the little mature tree canopy that we have? It is important to highlight that this plan proposes re-zoning a public school site from PL to MU-8. This is only obliquely referenced in your 145-page Staff Report a few times. Horizonte Instruction and Training Center is an alternative public high school in the Salt Lake City School District located at 1234 S. Main Street. Horizonte works with community organizations, including Catholic Community Services’ refugee resettlement program and the Odyssey House, to reach students from diverse backgrounds, and enrolls both high school-aged students and continuing education adults. In 2019, about 85% of the 217 12th grade students were low income, and those students collectively spoke more than a dozen languages. Horizonte is the is the only public school within our neighborhood boundaries. Maybe we could have emphasized this more during the Ballpark Station Area Plan meetings, which I was a part of, but during COVID and meeting over Zoom, we may not have thought to give this the emphasis that we should have. Community Council participation tends to select for people who experience the kind of privilege such that we might not have been taught at schools like Horizonte. Prior to the pandemic, Elizabeth, my neighbor across the street who grew up in Mexico and who learned English as a second language, was earning her GED at Horizonte. Does it serve the interests of equity and investing in human capital in the Ballpark neighborhood to rezone Horizonte? Does it serve the interests of economic development? I don’t know, but given the wider discussion about closing public elementary schools in Salt Lake City, it’s concerning that this isn’t part of the staff report and tonight’s discussion. Please discuss why we should consider rezoning this property. This is a huge project with big implications for the Ballpark neighborhood. I attended my first informal Ballpark Station Area Plan meeting with Christine Richman and Annaka Egan and others from GSBS Consulting to brainstorm about building the committee in November 2020. That means the Ballpark Community Council, along with and private and Planning Division partners, have been engaging on variations on this topic for three years, in spite of the pandemic. I applaud my community for showing up, online, on comment boards, on post-its, and then in person, even though we have been dealt what feels like a very significant blow of the Salt Lake Bees announcing that they are leaving our neighborhood. I also want to state our strong appreciation for how much the Planning Division, particularly Brooke Olson, John Anderson, and Nick Norris, have been willing to work with the Ballpark neighborhood and the Community Council in the past several months, working with us as we negotiated trying to find a new in-person meeting place—Thank you, Salt Lake Community College, for opening your doors to us—as we have been simultaneously juggling the engagement calendar of the engagement for this rezone, the Ballpark NEXT engagement plan, and the engagement for the 300 West Corridor and Central Pointe Station area plan. Not only did they and Nick Norris’s formidable e-bike show up for our in person meetings and our outdoor engagement event at Jefferson Park last week, but they heard our feedback and created a new form of zoning, MU-8, replacing the proposed TSA zoning. I’m grateful for the granular discussions they’ve had about Lucy and Paxton Avenue, activation requirements for ground floor use, and our concerns about greenspace. Their passion for community engagement is clear, and they have gone the extra mile to be collaborators with the community in this project. Sincerely, Amy J. Hawkins 1 Olson, Brooke From:Olson, Brooke Sent:Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:43 PM To:Ciara C Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Attachments:Tables4.pdf Hi Ciara, Thank you so much for reaching out with your ques ons and comments. Your comments will be provided to the City Council prior to the public hearing. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the proposal but the City's proposal is available on the project webpage: h$ps://www.slc.gov/planning/2023/04/14/ballparkplan-rezones/. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the City's Ballpark Sta on Area rezone proposal on October 25th, 2023, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposal. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmi$ed to the City Council Office. Once transmi$ed, the City Council will hold a briefing and a public hearing for the proposal and make a final decision. To provide you with some brief background informa on, the City is proposing to rezone proper es along Main Street and Major Street, 200 W, and West Temple to FB-UN2, Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. The City's rezone recommenda ons are based on land use, design, building height, and density recommenda ons specified in the Ballpark Sta on Area plan: h$p://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Master%20Plans/Central%20Community/22-10-27_Ballpark.pdf The majority of these areas proposed to be rezoned to FB-UN2 are currently zoned CC, Community Commercial and RMF-35, Mul family Residen al. The exis ng zoning CC and RMF-35 regula ons lack design standards, a mix of pedestrian oriented uses, and higher density allowance iden fied in the master plan. The plan calls for a moderate density mixed use development and buildings up to 4-7 stories in height, in the Main Street and State Street areas between 1300 S and Merrimac/Cleavland Avenue, as well as the Jefferson Park mixed use area along 200 W and West Temple. The proposed zoning changes are intended to establish a zoning framework which meets the master plan vision to create quality pedestrian oriented development that provides higher density housing, neighborhood ameni es, and ac vates the neighborhood. The FB-UN 2 zone is a form based mixed use district which allows a mix of residen al, office, ins tu onal, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The purpose of the FB-UN2 zone states the zone “Generally includes buildings up to four stories in height, with taller buildings located on street corner parcels, which may contain a single use or a mix of commercial, office, and residen al uses. Development regula ons are based on building type, with the overall scale, form, and orienta on of buildings as the primary focus.” The standards of the FB-UN2 zone are based on specific building forms established in the zone including: • Co$age Development • Row House • Mul family Residen al/ Storefront/Ver cal Mixed Use (Other) The FB-UN2 zoning regula ons were recently changed to address several livability concerns iden fied in the zoning regula ons including the lack of setback requirements and open space requirements as you men oned. The code changes were recently adopted by the City Council earlier this year. The changes increased the design standards, open space design standards, and required landscape yards for specific building forms and uses. The new regula ons are intended to create pedestrian oriented developments and mi gate impacts associated with higher density through a 2 variety of architectural design standards and addi onal setback requirements. Open space design standards have been added to ensure the open spaces on site consist of living vegeta on and are usable by all occupants of a property. I've a$ached a summary of the current FB-UN2 development regula ons, which list some of the general requirements of the zone. The development standards of the FB-UN2 zone can be found at this link: h$ps://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/saltlakecityut/latest/saltlakecity_ut/0-0-0-65370#JD_21A.27.050 Thank you again for reaching out and please let me know if you have any further ques ons. BROOKE OLSON | (She/Her/Hers) Principal Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: (801) 535-7118 Email: Brooke.olson@slcgov.com WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING WWW.SLC.GOV Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to ques ons as accurately as possible based upon the informa on provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to applica on are not binding and they are not a subs tute for formal Final Ac on, which may only occur in response to a complete applica on to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary wri$en feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. -----Original Message----- From: Ciara C < > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 12:39 PM To: Olson, Brooke <brooke.olson@slcgov.com> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Cau on: This is an external email. Please be cau ous when clicking links or opening a$achments. Dear Brook, I understand the comment period me for the Ballpark rezone has ended however I have simple ques on. This is not meant with anger or sarcasm but why is much of the rezone going to be FBUN 2? From what I understand that zone is extremely beneficial to the developer without much of a benefit to the neighborhood. Two examples are that the developer gets to build higher and without a setback. This seems like a nega ve to an area with many single family homes with the least amount of greenspace compared to any other area in the city. I truly want to know what the upside is. Thanks Ciara Sent from my iPhone 1 Olson, Brooke From:Charles Button < > Sent:Monday, October 30, 2023 2:32 PM To:Olson, Brooke Subject:(EXTERNAL) New Tag Comment Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Cau on: This is an external email. Please be cau ous when clicking links or opening a achments. Hello Brooke, Here is a new comment a er a ending planning commission for ballpark. As a homeowner on Jefferson street-I welcome the new zoning classifica on passed through the planning commission for the Ballpark proposal. I’m against TAGs amendments to change that new zoning to large scale RMU. Even TAG has made statements they want to align with ballpark plan but now sound like they just want to change for their purposes not the community/Ballpark Proposal. Planning Commission Berry and others almost voted against Ballpark plan due to wanted to remove 3 RMU zones near Jefferson street. Please deny TAGs two proposals. Thank you! Chuck B Jefferson Street Homeowner. Sent from my iPhone 7. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP WWC91 HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 847 SPANISH FORK UT 84660 951 WASHINGTON LLC 3037 E LOUISE AVE MILLCREEK UT 84109 LEE, CHRISTOPHER 955 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILCOX, STEFANIE 1589 W CHATEAU CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 WOLFSON WEST OLD KENTAPARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 PITTSBURGH HOUSE LOFTSLIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9TH STREET CENTER LLC 1175 E 1850 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 DAVIS, TRAVIS 967 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 244 FAYETTE, LLC 3170 BANNOCK DR PROVO UT 84604 PROVOST, TIFFANIE 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, JOSE R &ROSALBA R; JT 1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CAPITOL CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 FENTON & ELAINE BATES FAM TRET AL 6816 S ANDERSON WY WEST JORDAN UT 84084 SILVER ANTLER, LLC 1717 S REDWOOD RD board UT 84104 UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY board UT 84101 WASATCH LIMITED COMPANY 926 S JEFFERSON ST board UT 84101 965 CENTRAL LC 70 NORTH MAIN #106 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 PRICE 959 SOUTH, LLC 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FACADE, LLC 64 W FAYETTE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 987 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STRONG DESIGN, LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 AND JUSTICE FOR ALL 205 W 400 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DKL PROPERTIES, LLC 560 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 AMAZING GRACE, LC 503 E TENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 WEST BROOKLYN, LLC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 5,LLC 11995 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 TWO HUNDRED WEST, LLC 720 N REXFORD DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZE FAM REV TRUST) 1102 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZEF REV TRUST) 1112 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARATHON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,LLC 3731 W SOUTHJORDAN PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 LONG, JIMMIE E 1049 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE; JTLONARDO, MARCUS A; JT 160 E FORT UNION BLVD MIDVALE UT 84047 ROBERTS, KATHLEEN M 175 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MYLECRAINE, DAN E 171 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SS CAPITAL, LLC 35 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ELK RIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC 526 E REDONDO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 GILES, KRISTIE 1022 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASIC, AMRA 1032 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 1036 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BUTTON, CHARLES E 1052 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CABRERA, LERNICE 1056 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THORPE, JAMIE L 1058 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TENFIFTEEN PARTNERS, LLC 3045 E LOUISE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DE ANZA-C9 LP 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CAUSEY, KATHRYN A 923 LONGLEAF DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JOHNSON BROTHERS INVESTMENTS,LLC 126 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MATINKHAH, AKBAR 2618 E SKYLINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 CARNEGIE HOLDINGS LLC 4019 S OLYMPIC WY HOLLADAY UT 84124 R AND J PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENTS LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 INTERMOUNTAIN LAND COMPANY LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 KETCH, GREGORY C 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 GONZALEZ B, RUBEN A &LOPEZ V, TIMOTEO S; JT 1035 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BAILEY, GREG R; TRET AL 639 MOUNTAIN VIEW CIR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 MIDGLEY, DAVID P 1051 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLAGER, DOUGLAS; JTWRIGHT, MARCUS; JT 134 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ALLEN, CARLETON J 128 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CONNELLY, CARL 2263 E HIGH MOUNTAIN DR SANDY UT 84092 KOMAROV, VADIM D; JTLAMB, CHRISTOPHER E; JT 1002-1006 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAM, RACHELLE 1008 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, RICHARD E 1010 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 400 EAST/WT APARTMENTS, LLC 11589 S SUMMERFIELD CIR SANDY UT 84092 ADAMS, STEVEN C 1042 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BEMIS, DAVID M 8479 S 1380 E SANDY UT 84093 HERNANDEZ, JOSEPH L 1047 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 2223 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BURT, ANDREW; JTBURT, CYNTHIA; JT 133 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SIERRA, ISMAEL G &OJEDA, JESUS J; JT 1001 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN M 1058 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN; JTRANDALL, KEVIN; JT 1064 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 13818 S VESTRY RD DRAPER UT 84020 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1697 N FORT LN LAYTON UT 84041 CURRENT OCCUPANT 440 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLORES, GUADALUPE 1091 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SALT LAKE CITY 1530 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PEREZ, TERESA &CARDENAS, PASCUAL; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUNT, LARISSA M 167 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SOMEWHERE OTR, LLC PO BOX 9874 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 TAYLOR, JAMES C &JESSICA M; JT 3556 S 5600 W #1-533 WEST VALLEY UT 84120 GOWON, JOB G 145-147 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ANDERSON, LEE 137 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 TAG SLC, LLC 1089 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DOHENY-VIDOVICH PARTNERS 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CARDENAS, PASCUAL &PEREZ, MARIA T; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PEREZ, PEDRO CARDENAS 1127 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LARSON, JESSICA 1131 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THREE BIRDS, LLC 169 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TINOCO, ESTEBAN R. & SOPHIE R.4628 W 4695 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 KATHLEEN LOIS COCHRAN REV TRCOCHRAN, KATHLEEN L; TR 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 COCHRAN, KATHLEEN L; TR 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 GARZARELLI, DAN O 950 HARBOR AVE HENDERSON NV 89002 BUSTAMANTE, JUAN R &RAMIREZ, GRISELDA A; JT 139 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HART, NATHAN 2359 E 3225 S MILLCREEK UT 84109 GARCIA, LEO PAUL 182 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CASS, JEREMY; JTCASS, SARA; JT 178 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FINLINSON, MITCHELL T 172 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BRUNELLE, BRIANA 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ORLANDINI, KIM; JTET AL 5951 W JUNIPER ACRES CT WEST VALLEY UT 84128 TUMINEZ, JESSA; JTLONARDO, ANDRE; JT 162 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARQUIS, TANGUY 156 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HADLEY, PATRICK L; JTMAYBURY, KAREN; JT 152 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 EK REAL ESTATE FUND I, LLC 111 W 33RD ST NEW YORK NY 10120 SHAPIRO, ALLIE R 1420 PEERLESS PL APT 123 LOS ANGELES CA 90035 DALE WINETEER TRET AL 132 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COATES FAMILY INVESTING,LLC SERIES 2 PO BOX 526344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 KANE, JOHN A; JTKANE, CAROLINE O; JT 122 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH INC PO BOX 572070 MURRAY UT 84157 STATE OF UT, DIV OF FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT 450 N STATE OFFICE BLDG SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 HOUSING AUTHORITY OFSALT LAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STATE OF UTAH 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 10TH AND MAIN, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 8350 S VIA RIVIERA WY COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALTLAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STRONG DESIGN LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 N C CARRIDO INC 1085 N NOCTURNE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 COLLABORATIVE 1135 GP, LLC 1135 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLIAMSON, CARY AET AL 9938 S TULIP DR WHITE CITY UT 84094 D & P PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 10032 ROBIN OAKS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89117 SCHNEIDER, PROPERTIES, LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 35 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 1799 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 31 WEST FREMONT AVENUE LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 25 FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 21 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1127 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1133 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1139 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ACTION MOBILE REPAIRS, INC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 E7 PARTNERS, LLC 949 S DENVER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BLOCKYARD, LLC 1159-1161 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KCTH PROPERTY LLC 1165 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JAVA PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 71899 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 RIC-ROB LC 1130 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GS INVESTMENT, LLC 1160 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, EILEEN G; JTBROWN, MICHAEL J; JT 1148 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CUTTING, WILLIAM M III; JTET AL 1146 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLSON, SHEILA 1144 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG ROWHAUS, LLC 4035 W 58TH PLACE LOS ANGELES CA 90043 DAVID WULF & AARON NELSONLIVING TRUST 2845 S IMPERIAL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BENTLEY, ABBEY; JTABERMAN, MICHAEL; JT 1138 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCMAHON, JULIE R 1136 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICAL, LISA 1134 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TROP, DENNIS A 1132 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URRY, SLOAN 1130 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCKEON, KATHLEEN 1128 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 NELSON, JENIFER F 1126 S WESTTEMPLE ST #112 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 QUINN, PATRICK &HAMILTON, ERIN; JT 1124 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MORTENSEN-MAHYERA LIV TRET AL 1122 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARNWINE, CAITLIN; JTARNWINE, MATTHEW; JT 1120 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THOMAS, LEAH 353 E 1500 N OREM UT 84057 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 SORENSON, SCOTT 121 W FREMONT AVE #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 OCAMPO, KRISHEILA 123 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GONZOL, DARREN &MLEYNEK, TARA; JT 125 W FREMONT AVE #119 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WALKER, JESSE C &HOFELING, MARK; JT 127 W FREMONT AVE #120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASKETT, NATHAN T; JTWHITE, ADAM T; JT 129 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MASTAIN, HENRY S 131 W FREMONT AVE #122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCBRIDE, MARCUS 133 W FREEMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84701 FINLINSON, WHITNEY M 135 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOWMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 PARKSIDE CONDOS, LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOS,LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOMINIUMHOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION INC 7931 BLAZE TRAIL CT ORANGEVALE CA 95662 PAXTON PLACE, LLC 77 DRY CANYON DR LINDON UT 84042 M-SHOT HOLDINGS, LLC 6629 TROUT CREEK CT PARK CITY UT 84098 HALVERSON, JOHN L 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SPOTTY DOG ENTERPRISES LLC 809 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TUCKER TOWING, LLC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALVERSON, MARY E; JTHALVERSON, STEPHEN J; JT 1471 E TUMBLEWEED WY DRAPER UT 84020 ASCEND PROPERTIES, LLC 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 I LOVE LUCY AVE, LLC 600 E GILBERT DR TEMPE AZ 85281 D D MANAGEMENT, LLC 13775 S KENNINGTON CT DRAPER UT 84020 COLONY B LLC 196 W GOLF COURSE RD LOGAN UT 84341 LOWE'S HIW INC PO BOX 1000 MOORESVILLE NC 28115 JACOBS, RYAN C 230 W 1300 S #8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ZACHARIAS, NATHAN 230 W 1300 S #9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HENDERSON, ELENA K; JTHENDERSON, MICHAEL S; JT 230 W 1300 S #10 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAGARACI, ISABEL 230 W 1300 S #11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MYRICK, TREVOR 230 W 1300 S #12 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NEWBERRY, ARIA; JTPASSEY, NICHOLAS C; JT 230 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDREA B MITTON LIV TRMITTON, ANDREA B; TR 230 W 1300 S #14 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CW THE LUCY, LLC 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 PUPAIBOOL, JAKRAPUN 942 W LOTUS BROOK DR SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84119 MORGAN STEWART INVESTMENTS,LLC 230 W 1300 S #2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROBINSON, JASON R 7438 S DAN DR WEST JORDAN UT 84084 ERICKSEN, CHELSEA 230 W 1300 S #4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINS, MICHAEL G 230 W 1300 S #5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 URWIN, JEREMY 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 RICHARDS, CODY 230 W 1300 S #7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LING, MENG C 230 W 1300 S #29 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CROSSBOW PROPERTIES LLC 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 GOTHBERG, SPENCER 230 W 1300 S #31 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKS, KRISTINA R 230 W 1300 S #32 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SQUIRES, BROOKE 230 W 1300 S #33 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FITZGERALD, MARISSA V 230 W 1300 S #34 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SIDDEEK, HANI 230 W 1300 S #35 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KUSHNER, JOSHUA 230 W 1300 S #22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MCLEOD, SUSAN; JTMCLEOD, CHRISTOPHER; JT 230 W 1300 S #23 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MATTHEWS, SHAUN 230 W 1300 S #24 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PAN, JANE Y; JTTAN, HAI B; JT 741 E 600 N ROOSEVELT UT 84066 LAPP, ROBERT ANDREW 230 W 1300 S #26 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, GABRIELLA L 230 W 1300 S #27 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SASICH, MICHAEL J 230 W 1300 S #28 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PETERSEN, LANDONPETERSEN, JAXON 230 W 1300 S #15 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEWOLF FAM TRDEWOLF, JANICE B; TR 1250 S NEVADA AVE PROVO UT 84606 HANSEN, JINKY GATUTEO JTHANSEN, TYLER STEVEN JT 230 W 1300 S #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WONG, DENISE 230 W 1300 S #18 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CHERNENKO, ALLA JTVAN HUELE, YANNICK JT 230 W 1300 S #19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROTTER, ERIN; JTSANDERS, SAMUEL; JT 230 W 1300 S #20 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BUSHNELL, DAVID W; JTBROCKSCHMIDT, VERONICA L; JT 230 W 1300 S #21 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUCY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 ELLEFSEN, GIANNI 3010 S RICHMOND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 WARD, CLINT Z 179 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WHITLOCK, CAMERON T 175 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARLICK, SANDRA L 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KETCH, GREGORY C &KAREN A; JT 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 URBAN SENSE, LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 DOWLER ENTERPRISES LLC 1112 N 1100 W FARMINGTON UT 84025 DICKSON, KYLE 141 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GREENE, CHARLES A 137 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALL, KIM C 133 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JALALPOUR, JALEE 4121 WEBSTER ST OAKLAND CA 94609 KREMER, JORDAN 125 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUGHES, DON R 121 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F; JT 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F & SULIETI; TC 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GOODRICH, BENJAMIN P 174 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LEMASTER PROPERTIES, LLC 8084 S 1700 E SANDY UT 84093 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE 1055 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LUND, JENNY E &CHRISTIANSEN, KEVIN; JT 160 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GASS, PATRICK R 156 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KING, LARRY E, JR 150 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MILLS, DEXTER M; JTOVESON, JESSICA; JT 146 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ENGLAND, GEORGE M 211 E TRUMAN AVE SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 ELLIS, JODY R; JTELLIS, RONALD W; JT 130 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DEMILLE, JANIE A 132 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARIAS, JOSE G 140 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COBIAN, ANA D S 3683 S RIVER HORSE RD WEST VALLEY UT 84119 VIDAL, ARYS Q JR 122 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOOD, JAMES V 118 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOO, DAVID 2826 E DIMPLE DELL RD SANDY UT 84092 YBARRA, PETER E 1174 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 YBARRA, PATRICIA; SURVET AL 1178 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1182 WEST TEMPLE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HUGHES, LAUREN 1188 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WRIGHT, ANTHONY P; JTWRIGHT, MERRICK C; JT 1192 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN SENSE LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 KIM, SU H; JTBAE, JUNHYUK; JT 155 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARCIA, RUTH 125 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TANAKA, MELISSA R; JTTANAKA, ROGER H JR; JT 121 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ESMAY, RYAN K; JTCANENGUEZ, ANDREA M C; JT 119 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SAGONA, JORDAN M 117 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ZOBRIST, KARLY A 115 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, POMPILIO O 111 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 RAEMHILD, IAN 105 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALEY, MICHELE R 2967 E MORNINGSIDE DR HOLLADAY UT 84124 SCHEAR, ADAM G 1208 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICA, CADE S; JTMERICA, STEVIE Z; JT 1212 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KOCHERHANS, STEVEN 1216 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALTLAKE 1220 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 INDIAN WALK-IN CENTER INC 120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUTHLAND CORP, THE PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221 S L C CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 OIKOS 8 LLC 1185 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JENSEN, MARC R 1056 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 SALT LAKE CITY BOARD OFEDUCATION 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BFR, LLC 907 E 250 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BFR, LLC 185 S STATE ST #800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1300 BALLPARK, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VINA, SHERRY &ANTHONY D; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 BIJCO LLC 8704 S SUGARLOAF DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 RJL, LTD 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JEFFERSON STREET LLC PO BOX 571217 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84157 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 1349 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY CORP 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT UT 84101 JUDD JONES REFRACTORY &ACID SPECIALTIES INC 2904 MILLCREEK CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 JEFFERSON BALLPARK, LLC 1240 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 VILLAS AT 1400 SOUTHHOLDINGS, LP 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY LOGAN UT 84321 RICK & MEG OSGUTHORPE REV LIVTRUST 02/05/2023; ET AL 58 S TROUT LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 SHELTER THE HOMELESS, INC 242 W PARAMOUNT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 TABRIZ, SATTAR N 1429 E ROOSEVELT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 RENPRO TWO, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 HOME BASE APARTMENTS, LLC 3211 W STARLITE DR WEST JORDAN UT 84088 P STREET INVESTMENTS, LC 1328 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 SANDSTONE CAFE LLC 2182 E BALD EAGLE CT DRAPER UT 84020 FIREFIGHTERS CREDIT UNION 124 W 1400 S #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BALL PARK APARTMENTS, LP 1380 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEER RUN TIMBER, LLC 8919 S RED WILLOW CIR SANDY UT 84093 KNAPHUS, BRADLEY R 1410 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CR TOWNEGATE COMMUNITIES, LLC 444 W BEECH ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 RUECO, LLC; 41.46%TRADITION POINTE LLC; 58.54% 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 THOMAS, BRYSON 105-109 W 1400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3855 S 500 W SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 JOHNSON, RONALD K 1416 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECO, LLCTRADITION POINTE LLC 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 VICTORIA JOURDIN, LLC 38 S NORTHRIDGE WY SANDY UT 84092 YUCATAN LLC 540 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 OLIVER, ANGELA 1116 N SONATA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 CHIDAMBARAM, PRIYADHARSHINI 1421 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILLIAMS, MICHELLE L; JTWILLIAMS, ZACHARY R; JT 1429 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SILVA, DANIEL S; JTSILVA, MCKENZIE T; JT 68 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MISAKA, MARY S 62 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKHEAD, STANLEY J 1388 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RABAGLIA, JOSEPH 1396 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAWRENCE, ASHLEY &MAUSS, ANDREW; JT 1400 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLADE, CHRISTOPHER L; ET AL 1404 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CASH, GARY L 3 S ALTAWOOD DR SANDY UT 84092 CARLSEN, ERIKA 1418 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DUNCOMBE, EARL D &RENAE; JT 4051 S 3200 W WEST VALLEY UT 84119 MERRIMAC RENTALS, LLC 4893 GLENHOLLOW CIR OCEANSIDE CA 92057 SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FAJARDO, HIRAM H; JTKINSLEY-HERNANDEZ, JESSICA; JT 1381 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAPIA-GUZMAN, JULIO CESAR 7617 NE 1ST CT MIAMI FL 33138 MENZEL, JORDAN 1399 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 EKEY, MADISON; JTMEDLER, JONATHAN; JT 1401 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DERBIDGE, CHRIS &ROSIELER; JT 1407 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MONOCHROMATIC LLC 553 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 2174 S MAIN ST SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 1430 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH PRIDE CENTER PO BOX 1078 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1360 S MAIN, LLC 1360 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 OMAHONY, RYAN E 32 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALLISON, JOHN B &TONI L; JT 30 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HOU, JIN HUA 286 E SNOWY RIVER CT SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 WHALEY, BRIAN; JTHAWKINS, AMY; JT 26 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NELSON, RICHELLE L 24 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BBP INTERMOUNTAIN 1494 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WOLF, THOMAS &KIMBERLY; JT 1478 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HAYDEN, JAMES H &WEST, SCOTT E; JT 1488 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1500 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1502 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DENISTON, SHAWN J; ET AL 1748 E MOUNTAIN VIEW DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 HIGHCLIFF PROPERTYMANAGEMENT, LLC PO BOX 526110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 GABBOTT, LEWIS 1469 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAY, MARLIN D 1475 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LEBOUTILLIER, SHAWN T 1481 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOWEN, DONALD E; JTGOWEN, LAUREN V O; JT 1487 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDERSON, ADAM &AMANDA; JT 246 E HAMPTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAMPTON, MARY A M; JTET AL 65 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FLETCHER LEE STUMPH TRSTUMPH, FLETCHER; TR 1454 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ATWOOD, KIMBERLY M &GIBSON, STEVEN D; TC 1460 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JENNINGS, PAT &THOMAS L; JT 1470 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROWLAND, ANDREW C 1476 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAYLOR, CLAYTON R; JTMECHAM, SHELBIE A; JT 1482 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KETTLE CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC 13087 S 1300 W RIVERTON UT 84065 MIDDLETON, DORIS &SWARTZ, FLORENCE; JT 1494 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINSON, MONIQUE C; JTOBORN, CRAIG; JT 930 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, ET AL 1 EQUITY WY WESTLAKE OH 44145 KUNGA, THUPTEN &DOLMA, PHURBU; JT 64 W ANDREW AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TALLEY FAM LIV TRET AL 1964 E GYRFALCON DR SANDY UT 84092 RICHARDS0408 LLC 12786 S 600 E DRAPER UT 84020 TRAN DO REV TRTRAN, ANNA; TR 1859 W SIR JAMES DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BERGERA, JORDAN E; JTNINOWSKI, TIMOTHY J; JT 1455 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1463 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HYMAS, ANTHONY L; JTHYMAS, JULIE A; JT 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLASGOW, ROBERT E; JTGLASGOW, TIFFANY S; JT 1340 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JENNINGS-HILL, TIMOTHY 1487 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 YAMAGATA, MAKI 1491 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOHNS, KEELAN 2320 S 2100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GABBOTT'S ROW, LLC 650 S 500 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 C Z PROPERTIES LLC 1476 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARCIA, RASHELL C 1484 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATIONASSOCIATION A NON-PROFIT CORP 1488 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEFF SANDSTROM LIV TRSANDSTROM, JEFF; TR 35 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FOUR HOLDINGS, INC 1530 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARFF ENTERPROSES, INC 777 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, BILL B, TR 3433 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GARFF ENTERPRISES INC 64 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FOOD FORWARD HOLDINGS, LLC 439 E SEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HANSEN & HANSEN PROPERTIES LLC 5840 S HOLLADAY BLVD HOLLADAY UT 84121 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST #3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SHELTER THE HOMELESS II LC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CITY CREEK HOSPITALITY, LLC,LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ANDERSON, THOMAS E 3178 E VISTA BONITA CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 EVERGREENE CONSTRUCTION CO,LC 571 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CHEN'S INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 CHENS INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 DALE & LORILYN KINYON LIV TRET AL 1696 MUELLER PARK RD BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 RANDY TOPHAM PROPERTIES LLC 168 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 UNIQUE PROPERTIES, LLC 1677 E BURNING OAK DR DRAPER UT 84020 CREATESPACE SLC, LLC 2605 JEFFERSON AVE OGDEN UT 84401 FRESH START PROPERTIES LLC 1807 E VINTAGE OAK LN MURRAY UT 84121 KENTUCKY BOURBON LLC 832 E CLAYBOURNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CLARK, MARION B; TRSET AL 2500 E ARNETT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GREEN BEINGS LLC 563 E 3785 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84106 HODZIC, IRFAN &JASMINKA; JT 481 E 2700 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 CLATTERBUCK, ALISON O 1055 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 EVEREAL-ESTATE 2, LLC 11711 S GROVES MEADOW CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 PHOENIX WEST ENTERPRISE, LLC PO BOX 65694 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 OH MAI DOWNTOWN, INC 1102 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VASILIOU, GEORGE 1061 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCHOF SALT LAKE CITY 1090 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BECKSTRAND, DONALD S FAMILYLTD PARTNERSHIP 5727 S 675 E MURRAY UT 84107 ANDERSON, KATIE L 1144 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GODFREY, THOMAS; JTPACKER, KIERA K; JT 1150 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MAGAR, WILSON T 1154 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JORDAN, LAWRENCE W, JR 1160 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAEDER, RACHEL M 9 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SMITH, SEAN E; JTMARQUEZ, T'KEYA; JT 17 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VINA, SHERRY & RHETT B; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DSPTOO, LLC 1111 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 KUANG FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC 1623 W MORNING VIEW WY LEHI UT 84043 BROUSE, DONALD &SHARON; JT 1136 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LEDO ENTERPRISES PO BOX 9167 SPRINGFIELD MO 65801 60E LLC 2840 E JENNIE LN HOLLADAY UT 84117 DYNASTY CONDOMINIUMOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1623 W MORNING VIEW WAY LEHI UT 84043 PEREZ, INMER 1029 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 VALINO, GABINO F &ROBIN L; JT 1149 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CASTRO, MCEDGAR G 1155 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CORONODO, CLAUDIA 1167 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MARTINEZ, MARIO A 1535 S BRAVA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GRANT, TERI 1156 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILDING, THOMAS V 1162 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WALSTER, JOHN D; TR(JDWFT) PO BOX 65122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 KOTTWITZ, CASSINDA N 37 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GHIMIRE, BISHNU 41 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 45 EAST KELSEY, LLC 1373 E SKYLINE DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SCHNEIDER PROPERTIES LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 HUXFORD, TYLER; JTZUNIGA, YESENIA; JT 50 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MOORE, RYAN C; JTWILKINSON, OLIVIA E; JT 58 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1700 INVESTMENTS, LLC 1190 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 NATE WADE INVESTMENTCOMPANY 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BING KONG TONG INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1213 MAJOR STREET LLC 1539 E MEADOWMOOR RD HOLLADAY UT 84117 1200 STATE PROPERTY LLC 1418 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 BING KONG TONG, INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 GPKP, LLC 1220 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LANDEN PROPERTIES LLC 13 E WANDERWOOD WY SANDY UT 84092 FREE WESLEYAN CHURCH OFTONGA IN UTAH 57 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DAGNEY GROUP LLC THE 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 BMP II VENTURES, L.L.C.1343 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BMP VENTURES LLC 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 NATE WADE INVESTMENT 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 LOCKHART, DORINA C 1398 N 640 W WEST BOUNTIFUL UT 84087 NATE WADE INVESTMENT CO 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BIG CHEEZ PROPERTY MANAGEMENTLLC 1345 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BROTHERS & SON RETAIL LLC 1302 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1324 SOUTH STATE, LLC PO BOX 31356 TAMPA FL 33631 VU, HAI T T 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 AXIOM PROPERTIES III, LLC 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SCHILLING, BRUCE C; TR 917 E MILLCREEK WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 DEVARGAS, MARVINE M; TR 3774 S 400 E SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 1405 MAIN, LLC 2014 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 FAMILY HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 J & S AUTO SERVICE INC 1433 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGSLLC PO BOX 9948 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS,LLC 1163 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 PEREZ ENTERPRISES, INC 2774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 JOHNSON, JORDAN 23 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DALIPE, DEN M T; JTLAYDA, NATHALIE J C; JT 25 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILKINS, HEATHER R 29 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LE, TRUC T 33 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOR-LOKKEN,SNOWOWLWOLFESCHLEGELSTEINH 1392 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HRM REAL ESTATE, LLC 5267 W SUN BLOOM CIR HERRIMAN UT 84096 CATALAN PROPERTIES LLC 215 S 400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CATALAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C 1383 S MAJOR ST #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS, DANIEL 1389 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUZA LAND LLC 2230 DOC HOLLIDAY DR PARK CITY UT 84060 FOUNDRY PROPERTIES LLC 722 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 WASATCH INN, LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1438 S PROPERTIES LLC 3424 S STATE ST #A SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 GJACK ENTERPRISES LLC 59 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BIG WORLD PROPERTY LLC 8126 S HIDDEN SPRINGS CV SANDY UT 84094 CONDIE MAIN STREET HOLDINGS LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 PSAMMOSLIN LLC 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BRIGHT BOLIDE LLC 976 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STATE OF UTAH DIV FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MGMT 450 N STATE OFFICE #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 BEEHIVE STATE EMPLOYEESCREDIT UNION 40 NE LOOP 410 STE 607 SAN ANTONIO TX 78216 UTAH STATE BUILDINGOWNERSHIP AUTHORITY 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 MAJOR STREET BUILDING LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 RASMUSSEN, L NEIL &SALLY A; TRS 7988 S STAUNING CV COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 WASATCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1085 N MAIN ST BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BEN NELSON TRUST 12/14/2022NELSON, BENNY E; TR 1481 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WULFPAK PRODUCTIONS LLC 1483 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1485 MAJOR STREET, LLC 110 MATTERHORN DR PARK CITY UT 84098 MATTINGLY, PHILIP R TR PO BOX 375 HEBER CITY UT 84032 ATK, LLC 1017 W HIDDEN COVE DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 SUES ALTERATION UT INC 1441 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 KHANAL, BIPLOB; JTSHARMA, UMA; JT 1480 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BVT LLC 1484 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LASSETER, LINDA D 1463 S EDISON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LOTUS 1492 STATE, LLC 338 E SOUTHTEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JKC LLC 2843 E WATER VISTA WY SANDY UT 84093 NGUYEN, VINH; JTVO, LOAN; JT 1774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 OSTROWSKI PEARCE LIV TRET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOSSELIN-URIBE, ALEXANDRE; JTLOUGHLIN, EMILY Q; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUSTESEN, STEPHEN M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MANNAN, BEENISH; JTRAHIM, FAHIM; JT 2850 SUMMIT DR POCATELLO ID 83201 PETERSON, CLAIRE 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GRAVES, LINCOLN R; JTWEISBERG, BRENT M; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #F SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, BRADY; JTPATEL, CHANDANI; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE # G SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SINGH, SAHIBA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #H SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUNDQUIST, TAYLOR B; JTLUNDQUIST, LISA K; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #J SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UHLIG, KYLE; JTUHLIG, ANAHI N; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #K SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DANIEL HOUPT AND SHAWNA CUANTRUST; ET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #L SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECK, JOSEPH E; JTRUESCK, LAUREN E; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #M SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JIANG, ZIYANG 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAM, TUNG X 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #P SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHREYER, TANNER 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #Q SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEHERRERA, SAMANTHA A 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #R SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANASIK, CLAYTON 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SORRENTINO, DIANA M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #T SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 APHICO, LLC 1055 E LAFAYETTE ST SANDY UT 84094 PATEL, RUPA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #V SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 M15 LOFTS CONDOMINIUMASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 5555 DRAPER UT 84020 Current Occupant 945 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 951 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 961 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 964 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 966 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 970 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 943 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 947 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 969 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 971 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 954 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 965 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 223 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 215 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 933 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 935 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 959 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 46 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 960 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 24 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 52 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 80 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 949 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 975 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1018 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1024 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1050 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1098 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1039 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1055 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1046 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1015 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1075 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1062 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 120 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 111 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1025 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1043 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 124 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1061 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1101 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1103 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 175 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 149 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 135 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 168 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 158 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 154 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 148 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 136 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 122 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 110 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1085 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 185 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 157 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 145 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1143 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 166 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 160 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 138 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 134 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 128 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 65 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1020 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1099 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1041 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1011 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1070 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1116 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 60 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 56 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1152 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 35 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 31 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 25 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 21 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1127 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1133 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1139 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1155 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1171 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1150 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1164 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1172 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 131 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 133 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #2 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #3 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #4 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #5 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #6 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #7 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #8 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #9 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #10 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #11 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #12 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 218 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 227 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 211 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 220 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 225 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 238 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 228 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #11 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #13 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #3 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #6 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #30 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #25 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #16 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM2 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1167 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 173 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 182 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 170 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 164 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 140 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 155 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 180 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 55 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1186 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1234 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1285 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 34 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1270 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1338 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 135 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1309 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1317 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1321 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1333 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1339 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 77 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 150 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1386 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1390 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1445 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 208 W PARAMOUNT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1365 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 126 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1385 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 124 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1404 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 149 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1425 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 105 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 119 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1355 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1409 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1417 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1429 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1422 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 50 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1415 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1494 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1478 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1502 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1447 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1455 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1461 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1469 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1487 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1493 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1451 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1501 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1497 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 68 W ANDREW AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1431 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1449 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1499 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1498 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1530 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 20 E 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 958 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1017 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1025 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 21 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 999 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 998 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1035 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1007 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1009 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1019 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1000 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1004 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1010 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1016 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1026 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1030 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1045 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1077 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1085 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1101 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 50 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1051 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1050 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1062 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1084 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1175 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 19 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1141 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1151 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1157 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1142 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1148 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1152 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1156 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1122 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 60 E HARVARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #201 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #202 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #204 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #206 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #205 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #208 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #203 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #101 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #102 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1145 S FOULGER ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1150 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1185 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1222 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1207 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST #REAR Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1209 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1213 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1225 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1200 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1216 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 85 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1241 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1325 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1345 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1337 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 40 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 60 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1325 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1331 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1318 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1324 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1330 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1332 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1361 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1375 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1364 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1398 S MAJOR ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1406 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1412 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1420 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1359 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1363 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1379 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1383 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1393 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1374 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1392 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1416 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1438 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1479 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1476 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1457 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1467 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 38 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1482 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 48 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 54 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 58 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1453 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1463 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 47 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 65 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1458 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1460 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1472 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1504 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1446 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #D Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #U Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Received: 4/02/2024 Date sent to Council: 4/02/2024 ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 04/01/24 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: SLC Ballpark Station Area - Rezones STAFF CONTACT: Brooke Olson, Principal Planner brooke.olson@slcgov.com, 801-535-7118 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve the zoning map and zoning text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. The City is proposing rachel otto (Apr 2, 2024 14:20 MDT) associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station Area. Existing Zoning The project area is predominately zoned a variety of commercial and moderate density, multifamily residential zoning districts. The majority of the existing zoning districts within the project area do not provide the development standards, density, and land uses specified in the plan. Proposed Zoning The City is proposing three new zoning districts in the area to align with the plan, including the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. Additionally, the City is Proposed Zoning Map Existing Zoning Map proposing to exempt the MU-8 and FB-UN2 zones from the SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay zone which is mapped along the eastern boundary of the project area. Two properties located at 105 W 1400 S and 1410 S West Temple are owned by Salt Lake City Public Library. The properties are proposed to be rezoned from RMF-35 Multifamily Residential to PL Public Lands to accommodate the future development of a public library. Preserved Zoning The City is proposing to preserve the existing PL Public Lands and RMF-35 Multifamily Residential zoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North Parking lot, which will be considered in a second phase to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. The City is also proposing to preserve an R-1-5000 Single Family Residential zone north of Merrimac Avenue, the OS Open Space and R-MU Residential Mixed Use zoning in the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. Proposed MU-8 Zone The proposed MU-8 zone is a high density form based mixed use district which allows buildings up to eight stories in height and a mix of residential, office, institutional, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The zone aims to facilitate the creation of quality, high density, pedestrian oriented developments. The standards of the zone are form based and vary for each building form established in the zone including row houses, multifamily residential, storefront, and vertical mixed use. The standards are also intended to mitigate height and density impacts on adjacent properties, and properties located in low density zones. Staff presented the proposal at a Planning Commission work session meeting on October 11, 2023. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 25, 2023, voted, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. It should be noted sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone are currently being processed under a separate petition, PLNPCM2023-00959. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed sign regulations on January 24, 2024 and recommended approval to the City Council. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Council Office. Since petitions PLNPCM2023-00169 and PLNPCM2023-00959 are associated with creating regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone, the council may want to consider scheduling the briefings and public hearing for both petitions simultaneously if transmitted to Council Staff within similar timeframes. Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles The Ballpark Next community visioning process was initiated to establish guiding principles for the future use and development of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties. The draft Guiding Principles were published in January 2024 and will provide direction for decision making throughout the development process. As mentioned, the rezoning of the Ballpark and Ballpark North parking lot properties will be considered in a second phase of this proposal to align with the Ballpark Next community visioning process. However, if there is a desire to implement the proposed MU-8 zone on either of the properties the Council should consider a modification to the proposed ordinance to allow the following land uses in the MU-8 zone which were identified in the Ballpark Next process. These uses were not specifically identified as permitted uses in the proposal reviewed by the Planning Commission but the Council may desire to add them to the proposed ordinance now. • Amphitheater Formal • Amphitheater Informal • Health and Fitness Facility • Community Recreation Center • Plaza • Stadium PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the application was initiated: • April 2023 - An informational webpage posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. The webpage is regularly updated with new information as necessary. • June 2, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. • June 2, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. • July 13, 2023 – Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. • September 7, 2023 – Planning Staff modified the proposal based on the public input received and presented the proposal modifications at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal. • September 8, 2023 – The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. • September 8, 2023 - Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. • October 16, 2023 - Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. • October 25, 2023 – Planning Commission held a public hearing. Four members of the public spoke and the Ballpark Community Council submitted a letter. Several public comments have been received and are provided in Attachment D of the staff report. Initial modifications were made to the draft proposal in July through October 2023 in response to public comments received. A summary of the proposal modifications in response to public comments is provided in Attachment E of the Staff Report. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Memo of October 11, 2023 (Click to Access) d)PC Agenda of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) e)PC Minutes of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) f)Planning Commission Staff Report of October 25, 2023 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4)Petition Initiation Request 5) Ballpark Next Draft Guiding Principles 6) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 7)Mailing List ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2.PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4.PETITION INITATION REQUEST 5.BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6.PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED 7. MAILING LIST 1.ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels situated in the Ballpark Station Area Plan to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels in the boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area Plan as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 on an application submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to rezone certain parcels from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands pursuant to petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and 2 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto shall be and hereby are rezoned from CC Commercial Corridor, CG General Commercial, CN Neighborhood Commercial, PL Public Lands, RB Residential Business, RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential, and R-MU Residential Mixed Use to, as applicable, MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8, FB-UN1 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 1, FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2, and PL Public Lands. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code Section 10-3-713. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR 3 ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ballpark Station Area Rezonesv2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney February 19, 2024 4 EXHIBIT “A” Parcel Maps and Table Existing Zoning Map 5 Proposed Zoning Map PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-408-006-0000 1039 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-007-0000 1049 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-008-0000 1055 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-408-009-0000 175 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-010-0000 171 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-011-0000 165 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-012-0000 151 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-013-0000 1022 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-014-0000 1032 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-015-0000 1036 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-016-0000 1046 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-017-0000 1052 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-018-0000 1056 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-019-0000 1058 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-408-024-0000 1062 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-003-0000 129 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-004-0000 127 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-005-0000 111 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-006-0000 1025 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-007-0000 1035 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-008-0000 1043 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-011-0000 1051 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-016-0000 134 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-017-0000 128 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-018-0000 124 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-020-0000 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-021-0000 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-022-0000 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-023-0000 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-026-0000 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-031-0000 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-033-0000 1047 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-035-0000 1061 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-037-0000 133 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-038-0000 1001 S JEFFERSON ST RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-040-0000 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-041-0000 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-042-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-427-043-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-427-044-0000 <Null>RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-003-0000 1091 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-004-0000 1095 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-009-0000 175 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-010-0000 167 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-011-0000 163 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-012-0000 159 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-013-0000 149 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-014-0000 147 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-015-0000 137 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-016-0000 135 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-428-029-0000 1089 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-030-0000 1085 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-428-031-0000 185 W GOLTZ AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-001-0000 1121 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-002-0000 1127 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-003-0000 1131 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-004-0000 169 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-005-0000 163 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-006-0000 157 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-007-0000 151 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-008-0000 145 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-009-0000 139 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-013-0000 1143 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-014-0000 182 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-015-0000 178 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-016-0000 172 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-429-017-0000 170 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-018-0000 166 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-019-0000 160 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-020-0000 156 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-429-021-0000 152 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-022-0000 138 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-023-0000 134 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-024-0000 132 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-025-0000 128 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-429-026-0000 122 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-433-001-0000 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-002-0000 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-003-0000 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-004-0000 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-005-0000 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-006-0000 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-007-0000 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-008-0000 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-009-0000 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-010-0000 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-011-0000 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-012-0000 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-013-0000 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-014-0000 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-015-0000 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-016-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-433-017-0000 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-001-0000 121 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-002-0000 123 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-003-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-004-0000 127 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-005-0000 129 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-006-0000 131 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-007-0000 133 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-008-0000 135 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-434-009-0000 125 W FREMONT AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-001-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-002-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-003-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-004-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-005-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-006-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-007-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-008-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-009-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-010-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-011-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-012-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-435-013-0000 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-001-0000 1167 S 200 W RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-002-0000 179 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-003-0000 175 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-004-0000 173 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-005-0000 165 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-006-0000 159 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-009-0000 147 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-010-0000 141 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-011-0000 137 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-012-0000 133 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-013-0000 129 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-014-0000 125 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-015-0000 121 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-016-0000 182 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-017-0000 178 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-018-0000 174 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-019-0000 170 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-020-0000 164 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-021-0000 160 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-022-0000 156 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-023-0000 150 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-024-0000 146 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-025-0000 142 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-026-0000 140 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-027-0000 132 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-476-028-0000 130 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-029-0000 126 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-030-0000 122 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-031-0000 118 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-032-0000 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-033-0000 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-034-0000 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-035-0000 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-036-0000 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-037-0000 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-476-038-0000 155 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-476-039-0000 151 W PAXTON AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-002-0000 155 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-003-0000 125 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-004-0000 121 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-005-0000 119 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-006-0000 117 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-007-0000 115 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-008-0000 111 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-009-0000 105 W LUCY AVE RMF-35 FB-UN1 15-12-477-010-0000 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-011-0000 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-012-0000 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 FB-UN2 15-12-477-013-0000 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-12-477-014-0000 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 MU-8 15-13-229-003-0000 105 W 1400 S RMF-35 PL 15-13-229-004-0000 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST RMF-35 PL 15-12-481-008-0000 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-009-0000 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-010-0000 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-12-481-011-0000 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-004-0000 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-005-0000 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-226-006-0000 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-007-0000 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST RB MU-8 15-13-227-009-0000 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-228-006-0000 1414 S JEFFERSON ST R-MU MU-8 15-13-232-025-0000 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST R-MU MU-8 15-12-479-018-0000 1234 S MAIN ST PL MU-8 15-12-477-019-0000 114 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-020-0000 1285 S RICHARDS ST CN MU-8 15-12-479-021-0000 34 W 1300 S CN MU-8 15-12-479-022-0000 1270 S MAIN ST CN MU-8 15-12-481-007-0000 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST CN MU-8 15-12-477-018-0000 120 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-477-026-0000 180 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-480-001-0000 1338 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-001-0000 135 W 1300 S CG MU-8 15-12-481-002-0000 1309 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-003-0000 1317 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-004-0000 1321 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-481-005-0000 1333 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-001-0000 1340 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-210-005-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-211-009-0000 150 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-211-010-0000 1376 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-011-0000 1380 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-012-0000 1386 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-211-013-0000 1390 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-226-007-0000 <Null>CG MU-8 15-13-227-001-0000 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE CG MU-8 15-13-227-002-0000 1385 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-227-008-0000 124 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-228-002-0000 1404 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-228-003-0000 1410 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-002-0000 1425 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-13-229-006-0000 119 W 1400 S CG MU-8 15-13-229-007-0000 1411 S JEFFERSON ST CG MU-8 15-12-430-001-0000 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-430-024-0000 36 W FREMONT AVE CC FB-UN1 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 15-12-430-028-0000 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-001-0000 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-002-0000 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-431-010-0000 1116 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-014-0000 60 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-015-0000 56 W PAXTON AVE CC MU-8 15-12-431-017-0000 1152 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-431-020-0000 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST CC FB-UN2 15-12-432-009-0000 1155 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-010-0000 1159 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-011-0000 1165 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-012-0000 1171 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-016-0000 1150 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-017-0000 1160 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-018-0000 1164 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-432-019-0000 1172 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-001-0000 1185 S RICHARDS ST CC MU-8 15-12-479-010-0000 1186 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 15-13-231-022-0000 1400 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-023-0000 1414 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-024-0000 1430 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 15-13-231-028-0000 1380 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-305-010-0000 1175 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-018-0000 1160 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-305-019-0000 9 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-020-0000 17 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-021-0000 19 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-305-025-0000 1147 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-003-0000 1155 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-004-0000 1167 S FOULGER ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-008-0000 1162 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-351-009-0000 33 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-010-0000 37 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-351-011-0000 41 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-352-001-0000 1185 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-011-0000 1222 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-352-016-0000 1207 S MAIN ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-001-0000 50 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-002-0000 58 E KELSEY AVE CC MU-8 16-07-353-003-0000 1190 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-004-0000 1207 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-005-0000 1212 S STATE ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-006-0000 1209 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-007-0000 1213 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-008-0000 1225 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-353-019-0000 1241 S MAJOR ST CC MU-8 16-07-354-013-0000 1325 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-014-0000 28 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-015-0000 1345 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-354-017-0000 1337 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-001-0000 40 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-002-0000 60 E 1300 S CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-003-0000 1325 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-004-0000 1331 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-005-0000 1335 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-07-355-006-0000 1345 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-001-0000 1357 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-002-0000 1361 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-003-0000 1375 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-004-0000 1381 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-005-0000 1401 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-006-0000 1405 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-007-0000 1415 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-008-0000 1433 S MAIN ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-009-0000 1364 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-010-0000 1376 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-011-0000 1382 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-012-0000 1388 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-015-0000 1398 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-016-0000 1406 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 PARCEL_SID PARCEL_ADDR ZONING PROPOSED_ZONE 16-18-101-017-0000 1412 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-018-0000 1420 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-019-0000 1448 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-020-0000 23 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-021-0000 25 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-022-0000 29 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-023-0000 33 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 16-18-101-024-0000 1392 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-001-0000 1359 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-003-0000 1363 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-004-0000 1379 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-005-0000 1383 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-006-0000 1389 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-007-0000 1393 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-008-0000 1397 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-009-0000 1401 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-010-0000 1405 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-028-0000 1411 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-029-0000 1421 S MAJOR ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-030-0000 1356 S STATE ST CC FB-UN2 16-18-102-032-0000 59 E CLEVELAND AVE CC FB-UN2 1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. _____ of 2024 2 3 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the 4 Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) 5 6 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 7 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. 8 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 9 public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 10 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 11 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 12 establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 13 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition 14 No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and 15 WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 16 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 17 petition; and 18 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 19 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 21 22 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 23 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and 24 Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 25 2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the 26 zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 27 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: 28 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 29 districts: 30 31 Section Reference District Name A. Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B. Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict B.C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District B D. Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District D E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District E F. Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District F G. Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District G H. Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District H I. Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose 33 SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of 34 the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 35 new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: 36 CHAPTER 21A.25 37 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 38 39 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS 40 41 A.Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use42 districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in 43 the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, 44 increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by 45 increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The 46 regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward 47 public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. 48 49 B.Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based50 on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 51 5 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 52 1.Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed53 subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and 54 any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that 55 may be found in this title. 56 57 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a58 nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse 59 matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 60 61 21A.25.020: Reserved 62 63 21A.25.030: Reserved 64 65 21A.25.040: Reserved 66 67 21A.25.050: Reserved 68 69 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT 70 71 A.Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is72 to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight 73 stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in 74 or near the subdistrict. 75 76 B.Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated77 regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 78 79 1. Row House Building Form Standards:80 a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets:81 (i). 1300 South 82 (ii). West Temple 83 (iii). Main Street 84 85 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 86 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 87 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form88 Standards: 89 (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: 90 (i). 1300 South 91 (ii). West Temple 92 (iii). Main Street 93 94 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 95 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1.Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2.Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 96 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 97 98 C.Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this99 subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following 100 standards: 101 102 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio,103 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living 104 spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space 105 area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot 106 landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area 107 requirement. 108 109 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’110 by 15’. 111 112 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover113 at least 50% of the open space area. 114 115 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one116 useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. 117 118 a.A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area;119 b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space120 area; 121 c.An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to122 provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not 123 limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport 124 court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; 125 d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area.126 127 D.Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are128 listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable 129 parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. 130 131 132 TABLE 21A.25.060.D 133 DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 134 E.Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8135 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in 136 addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. 137 138 TABLE 21A.25.060.E 139 140 141 F.Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve142 construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any 143 specific building form regulation. 144 145 G.Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in146 this subdistrict. 147 148 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables149 1.The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2.The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a.Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b.A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2. 21A.36 General Provisions150 3. 21A.37 Design Standards151 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures152 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures153 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses154 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading155 8. 21A.46 Signs156 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers157 158 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That 159 Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 160 Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 161 A.Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020,162 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 163 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that 164 they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable 165 requirements of this title. 166 167 168 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That 169 Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 170 Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 171 B.Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020,172 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 173 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they 174 are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 175 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. 176 177 SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That 178 Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to 179 include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based 180 Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 181 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED 182 MIXED USE DISTRICTS 183 11 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 184 Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted 185 Use Permitted and Conditional Uses By District MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor) P Bar establishment (outdoor) P Brewpub (indoor) P1 Brewpub (outdoor) P1 Tavern (indoor) P1 Tavern (outdoor) C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental) P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 12 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large) P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small) P Congregate care facility (large) P Congregate care facility (small) P Group home (large) P Group home (small) P Multi-family P Residential support (large) P Residential support (small) P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor) P Recreation (outdoor) P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor) P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) 186 Qualifying provisions: 187 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related188 Establishments", of this title. 189 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales.190 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1.191 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or192 radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 193 administrative rules. 194 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this195 title. 196 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title.197 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title.198 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a199 property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building 200 demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 201 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar202 establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of 203 spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 204 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title.205 206 207 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That 208 Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 209 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 210 new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: 211 G.Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form212 Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 213 214 15 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That 215 Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With 216 Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as 217 follows. 218 C.Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning219 districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. 220 221 TABLE 21A.36.020.C 222 HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS 223 Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 224 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties225 and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky.226 16 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 227 228 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That 229 Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards 230 Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is 231 amended to read and appear as follows: 232 b.The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35233 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban234 Neighborhood), FB-MU11UN3 (Form Based Urban NeighborhoodMixed Use 11235 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-236 SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House237 Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this238 section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply.239 240 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 241 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each 242 Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H 243 while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: 244 H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts245 246 Standard (Code Section) District MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 17 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 Notes: 264 1.This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the265 following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to266 the building type being allowed in the zone.267 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone.268 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of269 the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection270 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall271 not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum.272 273 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. 274 That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General 275 Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and 276 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 277 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.265 through 21A.34 of this title: form based278 mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway 279 districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): 280 a.Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable281 materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing282 in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven283 chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone,284 metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or285 combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of286 similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon287 approval by the zZoning aAdministrator through an administrative288 interpretation application.289 b.Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be290 constructed of or contain:291 (1)Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal.292 (2)Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing293 such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or294 plywood.295 296 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That 297 Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 298 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is 299 amended to read and appear as follows: 300 20 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU Twin home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Two-family 21 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Nursing care facility Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Group home 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Residential support Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 301 302 303 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 23 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Crematorium 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community recreation center Jail Government facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Social service mission and charity dining hall Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Meeting hall membership organization Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas 24 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park See Table Note B No Maximum Ambulance service Cemetery No Minimum Plazas Park Open space Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. K-12 private Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity K-12 public 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Dance/music studio 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental) 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Hospital, including accessory lodging facility Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 304 305 306 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger Poultry farm or processing plant 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse Agricultural use No Minimum Community garden Farmer’s market 27 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Theater, live performance Theater, movie Amphitheater See Table Note B Athletic Field Stadium Tennis court (principal use) 2 spaces per court No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Bowling 2 spaces per lane Convention center 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium Health and fitness facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Performing arts production facility Reception center 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Recreation (indoor) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre) 1 space per designated camping or RV spot No Maximum Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor) See Table Note B Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Restaurant Tavern Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 29 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Department Fashion oriented development 30 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Flea market (indoor) Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 32 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Impound lot 33 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 307 308 309 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 TRANSPORTATION USES 34 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Airport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Heliport Bus line station/terminal No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking Railroad, repair shop 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum No Maximum Truck freight terminal Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per Bakery, commercial 35 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication Laundry, commercial 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing 36 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Printing plant Processing center (indoor) Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station No minimum Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility No minimum No maximum Building materials distribution Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage No minimum No minimum No maximum Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution 37 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution No Minimum No Maximum Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure No Minimum No Maximum Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station 38 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Living quarter for caretaker or security guard Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory No Maximum Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory 39 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 310 311 40 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That 312 Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 313 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is 314 amended to read and appear as follows:315 41 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 316 317 318 319 320 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft. 1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft. 1 per 8,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 42 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 321 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That 322 Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 323 Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and 324 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 325 43 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 326 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 6 ft. 0 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 0 ft. RMF-30 N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 15 ft. M-2 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. FP 20 ft. 6 ft. 0 ft. 44 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 30 ft. 10 ft. PL 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district PL-2 20 ft. RP 30 ft. 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-3 D-4 See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. G-MU 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB-SC N MU-8 TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 327 328 46 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That 329 Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 330 Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 331 and appear as follows: 332 47 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 333 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 334 48 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 335 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 336 first publication. 337 338 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. 339 340 341 ______________________________ 342 CHAIRPERSON 343 344 ATTEST: 345 346 ______________________________ 347 CITY RECORDER 348 349 350 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 351 352 353 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 354 355 356 ______________________________ 357 MAYOR 358 359 ______________________________ 360 CITY RECORDER 361 362 (SEAL) 363 364 Bill No. ________ of 2024. 365 Published: ______________. 366 367 368 Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (legislative)v2 369 370 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning districts: Section Reference District Name A. Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B. Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict C. Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District E.Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District H. Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District I. Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: CHAPTER 21A.25 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 21A.25.020: Reserved 21A.25.030: Reserved 21A.25.040: Reserved 21A.25.050: Reserved 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in or near the subdistrict. B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 1. Row House Building Form Standards: a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following standards: 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover at least 50% of the open space area. 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; and/or d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. TABLE 21A.25.060.D DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. TABLE 21A.25.060.E F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any specific building form regulation. G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in this subdistrict. 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 1.The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2.The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8. 21A.46 Signs 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 Legend: C = Conditional P = Permitted Use Permitted and Conditional Uses By District MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor) P Bar establishment (outdoor) P Brewpub (indoor) P1 Brewpub (outdoor) P1 Tavern (indoor) P1 Tavern (outdoor) C1 Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental) P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Crematorium P Daycare center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 12 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large) P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small) P Congregate care facility (large) P Congregate care facility (small) P Group home (large) P Group home (small) P Multi-family P Residential support (large) P Residential support (small) P Shared Housing P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P 13 Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P 5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor) P Recreation (outdoor) P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor) P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P 14 Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 15 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows. C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. TABLE 21A.36.020.C HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 16 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-MU11 (Form Based Mixed Use 11 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts Standard (Code Section) District MU-8 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 17 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3) X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) 18 Notes: 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to the building type being allowed in the zone. 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.25 through 21A.34 of this title: form based mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): a.Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon approval by the zoning administrator through an administrative interpretation application. b.Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be constructed of or contain: (1)Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. (2)Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or plywood. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU Twin home 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Two-family 21 Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Nursing care facility Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Group home 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Residential support Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum 22 Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 23 Crematorium 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Community recreation center Jail Government facility 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Social service mission and charity dining hall Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lounge 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Meeting hall membership organization Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas 24 Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 sq. ft., whichever is less 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Zoological park See Table Note B No Maximum Ambulance service Cemetery No Minimum Plazas Park Open space Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. K-12 private Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity K-12 public 25 Dance/music studio 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental) 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Hospital, including accessory lodging facility Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Kennel Pound Veterinary office Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger Poultry farm or processing plant 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse Agricultural use No Minimum Community garden Farmer’s market 27 Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Theater, live performance Theater, movie Amphitheater See Table Note B Athletic Field Stadium Tennis court (principal use) 2 spaces per court No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Bowling 2 spaces per lane Convention center 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium Health and fitness facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Performing arts production facility Reception center 28 Recreation (indoor) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre) 1 space per designated camping or RV spot No Maximum Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor) See Table Note B Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Restaurant Tavern Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Department Fashion oriented development 30 Flea market (indoor) Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Impound lot 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,0000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Heliport 34 Bus line station/terminal No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking Railroad, repair shop 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum No Maximum Truck freight terminal Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Bakery, commercial 35 Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office No Minimum No Maximum Processing center (outdoor) Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication Laundry, commercial 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) 36 Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station No minimum Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility No minimum No maximum Building materials distribution Flammable liquids or gases, beating fuel distribution and storage No minimum No minimum No maximum Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution No Minimum No Maximum Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure No Minimum No Maximum Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Living quarter for caretaker or security guard Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum No Maximum Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory No Maximum Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory 39 Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons who’s right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 40 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 41 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft. 1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft. 1 per 8,000 sq. ft. 1 per 5,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 42 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 43 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 6 ft. 0 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 0 ft. RMF-30 N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 15 ft. M-2 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. FP 20 ft. 6 ft. 0 ft. 44 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 30 ft. 10 ft. PL 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district PL-2 20 ft. RP 30 ft. 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-3 D-4 See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. G-MU 45 FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC N MU-8 TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 46 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 47 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: Use General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 48 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 (final)v2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney February 19, 2024 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00169 Nov. 2021 Salt Lake City initiated the creation of a small area plan within the Ballpark Neighborhood, The Ballpark Station Area Plan. Oct. 18 2022 The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by Salt Lake City Council. Mar. 1, 2023 Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning map and zoning text amendment petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and rezone properties within the boundaries of the plan. Mar. 22, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00169 assigned to Brooke Olson, Principal Planner. Apr. 2023 An informational webpage was posted to the Planning Division’s website. This webpage provides additional information regarding the City’s proposal, frequently asked questions, next steps in the Planning process, and the project contact information. Apr. – Jun. 2023 Zoning map and text amendment proposal was refined and finalized. Jun. 2, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Jul. 13, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal at the joint Ballpark and Central 9th Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. Jul. – Sept. 2023 Significant modifications were made to the proposal in response to public input received. Sept. 7, 2023 Planning Staff presented the proposal modifications at a Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the modified proposal. Sept. 8, 2023 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal modifications. The Ballpark, Central 9th, Liberty Wells, and Central City Community Councils were sent a 45-day notice for the proposal modifications. Oct. 11, 2023 Staff presented the petition at a Planning Commission work session meeting to gather feedback, identify key issues, and answer questions in anticipation of a future public hearing. Oct. 13, 2023 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing is sent to property owners and occupants within 300 ft of the subject properties. Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing property signs are also posted in the project boundary. Oct. 16, 2023 Planning Staff held a public engagement event to inform the public and solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director Oct. 25, 2023 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the petition and voted to recommend the City Council adopt the proposed zoning map and zoning text amendments. Nov. 21, 2023 Draft ordinances requested from the City Attorney’s Office. Nov. 29, 2023 The Planning Commission ratifies the minutes for their meeting on October 25, 2023. Jan. 29, 2024 Draft ordinances received from the City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00169– Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated this petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan, and rezone properties identified within four future land use areas specified in the plan including the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street Area, State Street Area, and the Jefferson Park Mixed Use Area. The proposal consists of the following amendments: A: Zoning Map Amendments: The proposed zoning map amendments are intended to establish zoning districts that align with the goals, policies, future land use recommendations, and community vision established in the plan. B: Zoning Text Amendments: The City is proposing zoning text amendments to establish a new zone, MU-8, Form Based, Mixed Use 8 Zoning District. The City is proposing associated zoning map amendments to implement the proposed MU-8 zone in the Ballpark Station area, within a portion of the Heart of the Neighborhood, Main Street and State Street Areas. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Brooke Olson at 801-535-7118 or via e-mail at brooke.olson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00169. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4.PETITION INITATION REQUEST 5. BALLPARK NEXT DRAFT GUIDING PRINCIPLES Ballpark NEXT Vision Statement Guiding Principles 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED October 25, 2023 Hello Planning Commissioners, My name is Amy J. Hawkins, and I serve as Chair of the Ballpark Community Council. Thank you for your attention this evening during a lengthily virtual meeting. My additional thanks are plentiful and at the end of this comment. We only have three out of five Ballpark Community Council board positions filled as we come up to an election next week, so I hesitate to say that these comments are the official position of the board. However, they are informed by extensive public engagement sessions with the Ballpark Community Council. My remarks tonight are fundamental: we understand that fixed rail goes through our neighborhood. We hope to capitalize on the opportunities it provides for economic development, best practices in urban planning, and the ability for folks to live in what’s almost a “15-minute neighborhood”, without displacing our committed residents and businesses, allowing folks the opportunity to age in place, without sacrificing affordability or community safety. These desires sound completely reasonable to residents and yet aren’t an easy ask in one of the most rapidly developing neighborhoods in one of the most actively growing metropolitan areas in the United States. Residents are concerned about plans to add substantial housing density when 1) we are already short on public land and spaces to recreate to support residents’ health, and 2) we’re concerned about plans for rezoning that eliminate setbacks. I know some view setbacks as a way to make housing unnecessarily more expensive, but in a community that already has serious disparities in our neighborhood’s urban tree canopy, in health outcomes, and a demonstrable heat island effect, removing setbacks removes our remaining opportunities to grow our urban tree canopy and protect our future residents. Planning Commissioners, please view setbacks through the lens of what needs to happen to prevent our heat island effect from becoming worse in a neighborhood that is still hurting from the effects of redlining and the “People’s Freeway”—Interstate 15, the 9th South offramp, and State Street, that powerfully disconnect us from our neighbors. We realize that the guiding principles for the Ballpark NEXT project may direct future planners to meet some of these concerns, but since that project is now completely disconnected from this Ballpark rezone proposal, we can’t build in those expectations for the Ballpark space when the committee may choose to go in a completely different direction. Over and over, I heard from fellow residents that we want to avoid recreating the problems of 400 South in this new MU-8 zone in Ballpark. Do these new MU-8 ground floor activation requirements do enough to avoid the problems of 400 South? Are there special considerations to preserve the little mature tree canopy that we have? It is important to highlight that this plan proposes re-zoning a public school site from PL to MU-8. This is only obliquely referenced in your 145-page Staff Report a few times. Horizonte Instruction and Training Center is an alternative public high school in the Salt Lake City School District located at 1234 S. Main Street. Horizonte works with community organizations, including Catholic Community Services’ refugee resettlement program and the Odyssey House, to reach students from diverse backgrounds, and enrolls both high school-aged students and continuing education adults. In 2019, about 85% of the 217 12th grade students were low income, and those students collectively spoke more than a dozen languages. Horizonte is the is the only public school within our neighborhood boundaries. Maybe we could have emphasized this more during the Ballpark Station Area Plan meetings, which I was a part of, but during COVID and meeting over Zoom, we may not have thought to give this the emphasis that we should have. Community Council participation tends to select for people who experience the kind of privilege such that we might not have been taught at schools like Horizonte. Prior to the pandemic, Elizabeth, my neighbor across the street who grew up in Mexico and who learned English as a second language, was earning her GED at Horizonte. Does it serve the interests of equity and investing in human capital in the Ballpark neighborhood to rezone Horizonte? Does it serve the interests of economic development? I don’t know, but given the wider discussion about closing public elementary schools in Salt Lake City, it’s concerning that this isn’t part of the staff report and tonight’s discussion. Please discuss why we should consider rezoning this property. This is a huge project with big implications for the Ballpark neighborhood. I attended my first informal Ballpark Station Area Plan meeting with Christine Richman and Annaka Egan and others from GSBS Consulting to brainstorm about building the committee in November 2020. That means the Ballpark Community Council, along with and private and Planning Division partners, have been engaging on variations on this topic for three years, in spite of the pandemic. I applaud my community for showing up, online, on comment boards, on post-its, and then in person, even though we have been dealt what feels like a very significant blow of the Salt Lake Bees announcing that they are leaving our neighborhood. I also want to state our strong appreciation for how much the Planning Division, particularly Brooke Olson, John Anderson, and Nick Norris, have been willing to work with the Ballpark neighborhood and the Community Council in the past several months, working with us as we negotiated trying to find a new in-person meeting place—Thank you, Salt Lake Community College, for opening your doors to us—as we have been simultaneously juggling the engagement calendar of the engagement for this rezone, the Ballpark NEXT engagement plan, and the engagement for the 300 West Corridor and Central Pointe Station area plan. Not only did they and Nick Norris’s formidable e-bike show up for our in person meetings and our outdoor engagement event at Jefferson Park last week, but they heard our feedback and created a new form of zoning, MU-8, replacing the proposed TSA zoning. I’m grateful for the granular discussions they’ve had about Lucy and Paxton Avenue, activation requirements for ground floor use, and our concerns about greenspace. Their passion for community engagement is clear, and they have gone the extra mile to be collaborators with the community in this project. Sincerely, Amy J. Hawkins 1 Olson, Brooke From:Olson, Brooke Sent:Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:43 PM To:Ciara C Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Attachments:Tables4.pdf Hi Ciara, Thank you so much for reaching out with your ques ons and comments. Your comments will be provided to the City Council prior to the public hearing. I'm not sure how familiar you are with the proposal but the City's proposal is available on the project webpage: h$ps://www.slc.gov/planning/2023/04/14/ballparkplan-rezones/. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the City's Ballpark Sta on Area rezone proposal on October 25th, 2023, and recommended the City Council adopt the proposal. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmi$ed to the City Council Office. Once transmi$ed, the City Council will hold a briefing and a public hearing for the proposal and make a final decision. To provide you with some brief background informa on, the City is proposing to rezone proper es along Main Street and Major Street, 200 W, and West Temple to FB-UN2, Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2. The City's rezone recommenda ons are based on land use, design, building height, and density recommenda ons specified in the Ballpark Sta on Area plan: h$p://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Master%20Plans/Central%20Community/22-10-27_Ballpark.pdf The majority of these areas proposed to be rezoned to FB-UN2 are currently zoned CC, Community Commercial and RMF-35, Mul family Residen al. The exis ng zoning CC and RMF-35 regula ons lack design standards, a mix of pedestrian oriented uses, and higher density allowance iden fied in the master plan. The plan calls for a moderate density mixed use development and buildings up to 4-7 stories in height, in the Main Street and State Street areas between 1300 S and Merrimac/Cleavland Avenue, as well as the Jefferson Park mixed use area along 200 W and West Temple. The proposed zoning changes are intended to establish a zoning framework which meets the master plan vision to create quality pedestrian oriented development that provides higher density housing, neighborhood ameni es, and ac vates the neighborhood. The FB-UN 2 zone is a form based mixed use district which allows a mix of residen al, office, ins tu onal, community, open space, commercial, and retail service uses. The purpose of the FB-UN2 zone states the zone “Generally includes buildings up to four stories in height, with taller buildings located on street corner parcels, which may contain a single use or a mix of commercial, office, and residen al uses. Development regula ons are based on building type, with the overall scale, form, and orienta on of buildings as the primary focus.” The standards of the FB-UN2 zone are based on specific building forms established in the zone including: • Co$age Development • Row House • Mul family Residen al/ Storefront/Ver cal Mixed Use (Other) The FB-UN2 zoning regula ons were recently changed to address several livability concerns iden fied in the zoning regula ons including the lack of setback requirements and open space requirements as you men oned. The code changes were recently adopted by the City Council earlier this year. The changes increased the design standards, open space design standards, and required landscape yards for specific building forms and uses. The new regula ons are intended to create pedestrian oriented developments and mi gate impacts associated with higher density through a 2 variety of architectural design standards and addi onal setback requirements. Open space design standards have been added to ensure the open spaces on site consist of living vegeta on and are usable by all occupants of a property. I've a$ached a summary of the current FB-UN2 development regula ons, which list some of the general requirements of the zone. The development standards of the FB-UN2 zone can be found at this link: h$ps://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/saltlakecityut/latest/saltlakecity_ut/0-0-0-65370#JD_21A.27.050 Thank you again for reaching out and please let me know if you have any further ques ons. BROOKE OLSON | (She/Her/Hers) Principal Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: (801) 535-7118 Email: Brooke.olson@slcgov.com WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING WWW.SLC.GOV Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to ques ons as accurately as possible based upon the informa on provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to applica on are not binding and they are not a subs tute for formal Final Ac on, which may only occur in response to a complete applica on to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary wri$en feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. -----Original Message----- From: Ciara C < > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 12:39 PM To: Olson, Brooke <brooke.olson@slcgov.com> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Ballpark rezone Cau on: This is an external email. Please be cau ous when clicking links or opening a$achments. Dear Brook, I understand the comment period me for the Ballpark rezone has ended however I have simple ques on. This is not meant with anger or sarcasm but why is much of the rezone going to be FBUN 2? From what I understand that zone is extremely beneficial to the developer without much of a benefit to the neighborhood. Two examples are that the developer gets to build higher and without a setback. This seems like a nega ve to an area with many single family homes with the least amount of greenspace compared to any other area in the city. I truly want to know what the upside is. Thanks Ciara Sent from my iPhone 1 Olson, Brooke From:Charles Button < > Sent:Monday, October 30, 2023 2:32 PM To:Olson, Brooke Subject:(EXTERNAL) New Tag Comment Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Cau on: This is an external email. Please be cau ous when clicking links or opening a achments. Hello Brooke, Here is a new comment a er a ending planning commission for ballpark. As a homeowner on Jefferson street-I welcome the new zoning classifica on passed through the planning commission for the Ballpark proposal. I’m against TAGs amendments to change that new zoning to large scale RMU. Even TAG has made statements they want to align with ballpark plan but now sound like they just want to change for their purposes not the community/Ballpark Proposal. Planning Commission Berry and others almost voted against Ballpark plan due to wanted to remove 3 RMU zones near Jefferson street. Please deny TAGs two proposals. Thank you! Chuck B Jefferson Street Homeowner. Sent from my iPhone 7. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP WWC91 HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 847 SPANISH FORK UT 84660 951 WASHINGTON LLC 3037 E LOUISE AVE MILLCREEK UT 84109 LEE, CHRISTOPHER 955 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILCOX, STEFANIE 1589 W CHATEAU CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 WOLFSON WEST OLD KENTAPARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 PITTSBURGH HOUSE LOFTSLIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9TH STREET CENTER LLC 1175 E 1850 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 DAVIS, TRAVIS 967 S WASHINGTON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 244 FAYETTE, LLC 3170 BANNOCK DR PROVO UT 84604 PROVOST, TIFFANIE 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, JOSE R &ROSALBA R; JT 1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CAPITOL CENTER PROPERTIES, LLC 1475 E SIGSBEE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 FENTON & ELAINE BATES FAM TRET AL 6816 S ANDERSON WY WEST JORDAN UT 84084 SILVER ANTLER, LLC 1717 S REDWOOD RD board UT 84104 UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY 669 WEST 200 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY board UT 84101 WASATCH LIMITED COMPANY 926 S JEFFERSON ST board UT 84101 965 CENTRAL LC 70 NORTH MAIN #106 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 PRICE 959 SOUTH, LLC 230 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FACADE, LLC 64 W FAYETTE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 987 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STRONG DESIGN, LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 AND JUSTICE FOR ALL 205 W 400 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DKL PROPERTIES, LLC 560 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 AMAZING GRACE, LC 503 E TENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 WEST BROOKLYN, LLC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 5,LLC 11995 EL CAMINO REAL SAN DIEGO CA 92130 TWO HUNDRED WEST, LLC 720 N REXFORD DR BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZE FAM REV TRUST) 1102 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JOHNSON, LISA; TR(EZEF REV TRUST) 1112 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARATHON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,LLC 3731 W SOUTHJORDAN PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 LONG, JIMMIE E 1049 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE; JTLONARDO, MARCUS A; JT 160 E FORT UNION BLVD MIDVALE UT 84047 ROBERTS, KATHLEEN M 175 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MYLECRAINE, DAN E 171 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SS CAPITAL, LLC 35 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ELK RIDGE MANAGEMENT, LLC 526 E REDONDO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 GILES, KRISTIE 1022 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASIC, AMRA 1032 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 1036 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BUTTON, CHARLES E 1052 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CABRERA, LERNICE 1056 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THORPE, JAMIE L 1058 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TENFIFTEEN PARTNERS, LLC 3045 E LOUISE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DE ANZA-C9 LP 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CAUSEY, KATHRYN A 923 LONGLEAF DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JOHNSON BROTHERS INVESTMENTS,LLC 126 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MATINKHAH, AKBAR 2618 E SKYLINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 CARNEGIE HOLDINGS LLC 4019 S OLYMPIC WY HOLLADAY UT 84124 R AND J PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENTS LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 INTERMOUNTAIN LAND COMPANY LLC 5288 S COMMERCE DR #B-150 MURRAY UT 84107 KETCH, GREGORY C 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 GONZALEZ B, RUBEN A &LOPEZ V, TIMOTEO S; JT 1035 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BAILEY, GREG R; TRET AL 639 MOUNTAIN VIEW CIR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 MIDGLEY, DAVID P 1051 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLAGER, DOUGLAS; JTWRIGHT, MARCUS; JT 134 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ALLEN, CARLETON J 128 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CONNELLY, CARL 2263 E HIGH MOUNTAIN DR SANDY UT 84092 KOMAROV, VADIM D; JTLAMB, CHRISTOPHER E; JT 1002-1006 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAM, RACHELLE 1008 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, RICHARD E 1010 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 400 EAST/WT APARTMENTS, LLC 11589 S SUMMERFIELD CIR SANDY UT 84092 ADAMS, STEVEN C 1042 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BEMIS, DAVID M 8479 S 1380 E SANDY UT 84093 HERNANDEZ, JOSEPH L 1047 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG HOLDINGS, LLC 2223 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BURT, ANDREW; JTBURT, CYNTHIA; JT 133 W MEAD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SIERRA, ISMAEL G &OJEDA, JESUS J; JT 1001 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN M 1058 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MANO, DARIN; JTRANDALL, KEVIN; JT 1064 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 13818 S VESTRY RD DRAPER UT 84020 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1697 N FORT LN LAYTON UT 84041 CURRENT OCCUPANT 440 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FLORES, GUADALUPE 1091 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SALT LAKE CITY 1530 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PEREZ, TERESA &CARDENAS, PASCUAL; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUNT, LARISSA M 167 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SOMEWHERE OTR, LLC PO BOX 9874 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 TAYLOR, JAMES C &JESSICA M; JT 3556 S 5600 W #1-533 WEST VALLEY UT 84120 GOWON, JOB G 145-147 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ANDERSON, LEE 137 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 TAG SLC, LLC 1089 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DOHENY-VIDOVICH PARTNERS 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 CARDENAS, PASCUAL &PEREZ, MARIA T; JT 1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PEREZ, PEDRO CARDENAS 1127 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LARSON, JESSICA 1131 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THREE BIRDS, LLC 169 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TINOCO, ESTEBAN R. & SOPHIE R.4628 W 4695 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 KATHLEEN LOIS COCHRAN REV TRCOCHRAN, KATHLEEN L; TR 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 COCHRAN, KATHLEEN L; TR 347 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 GARZARELLI, DAN O 950 HARBOR AVE HENDERSON NV 89002 BUSTAMANTE, JUAN R &RAMIREZ, GRISELDA A; JT 139 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HART, NATHAN 2359 E 3225 S MILLCREEK UT 84109 GARCIA, LEO PAUL 182 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CASS, JEREMY; JTCASS, SARA; JT 178 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FINLINSON, MITCHELL T 172 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BRUNELLE, BRIANA 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ORLANDINI, KIM; JTET AL 5951 W JUNIPER ACRES CT WEST VALLEY UT 84128 TUMINEZ, JESSA; JTLONARDO, ANDRE; JT 162 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARQUIS, TANGUY 156 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HADLEY, PATRICK L; JTMAYBURY, KAREN; JT 152 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 EK REAL ESTATE FUND I, LLC 111 W 33RD ST NEW YORK NY 10120 SHAPIRO, ALLIE R 1420 PEERLESS PL APT 123 LOS ANGELES CA 90035 DALE WINETEER TRET AL 132 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COATES FAMILY INVESTING,LLC SERIES 2 PO BOX 526344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 KANE, JOHN A; JTKANE, CAROLINE O; JT 122 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH INC PO BOX 572070 MURRAY UT 84157 STATE OF UT, DIV OF FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT 450 N STATE OFFICE BLDG SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 HOUSING AUTHORITY OFSALT LAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STATE OF UTAH 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 10TH AND MAIN, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST #104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LAKE LIMITED 8350 S VIA RIVIERA WY COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALTLAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STRONG DESIGN LLC 979 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 N C CARRIDO INC 1085 N NOCTURNE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 COLLABORATIVE 1135 GP, LLC 1135 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLIAMSON, CARY AET AL 9938 S TULIP DR WHITE CITY UT 84094 D & P PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 10032 ROBIN OAKS DR LAS VEGAS NV 89117 SCHNEIDER, PROPERTIES, LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 35 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 1799 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 31 WEST FREMONT AVENUE LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 25 FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 21 WEST FREMONT AVENUE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1127 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1133 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 1139 RICHARDS STREET, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ACTION MOBILE REPAIRS, INC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 E7 PARTNERS, LLC 949 S DENVER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BLOCKYARD, LLC 1159-1161 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KCTH PROPERTY LLC 1165 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JAVA PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 71899 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 RIC-ROB LC 1130 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GS INVESTMENT, LLC 1160 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, EILEEN G; JTBROWN, MICHAEL J; JT 1148 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CUTTING, WILLIAM M III; JTET AL 1146 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLSON, SHEILA 1144 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG ROWHAUS, LLC 4035 W 58TH PLACE LOS ANGELES CA 90043 DAVID WULF & AARON NELSONLIVING TRUST 2845 S IMPERIAL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 BENTLEY, ABBEY; JTABERMAN, MICHAEL; JT 1138 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCMAHON, JULIE R 1136 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICAL, LISA 1134 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TROP, DENNIS A 1132 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URRY, SLOAN 1130 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCKEON, KATHLEEN 1128 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 NELSON, JENIFER F 1126 S WESTTEMPLE ST #112 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 QUINN, PATRICK &HAMILTON, ERIN; JT 1124 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MORTENSEN-MAHYERA LIV TRET AL 1122 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARNWINE, CAITLIN; JTARNWINE, MATTHEW; JT 1120 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THOMAS, LEAH 353 E 1500 N OREM UT 84057 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 SORENSON, SCOTT 121 W FREMONT AVE #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 OCAMPO, KRISHEILA 123 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GONZOL, DARREN &MLEYNEK, TARA; JT 125 W FREMONT AVE #119 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WALKER, JESSE C &HOFELING, MARK; JT 127 W FREMONT AVE #120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASKETT, NATHAN T; JTWHITE, ADAM T; JT 129 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MASTAIN, HENRY S 131 W FREMONT AVE #122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MCBRIDE, MARCUS 133 W FREEMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84701 FINLINSON, WHITNEY M 135 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMSHOWMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 262 E 3900 S #200 MURRAY UT 84107 PARKSIDE CONDOS, LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOS,LLC 1944 E QUARTZRIDGE DR SANDY UT 84092 PARKSIDE CONDOMINIUMHOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION INC 7931 BLAZE TRAIL CT ORANGEVALE CA 95662 PAXTON PLACE, LLC 77 DRY CANYON DR LINDON UT 84042 M-SHOT HOLDINGS, LLC 6629 TROUT CREEK CT PARK CITY UT 84098 HALVERSON, JOHN L 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SPOTTY DOG ENTERPRISES LLC 809 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TUCKER TOWING, LLC 1145 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALVERSON, MARY E; JTHALVERSON, STEPHEN J; JT 1471 E TUMBLEWEED WY DRAPER UT 84020 ASCEND PROPERTIES, LLC 235 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 I LOVE LUCY AVE, LLC 600 E GILBERT DR TEMPE AZ 85281 D D MANAGEMENT, LLC 13775 S KENNINGTON CT DRAPER UT 84020 COLONY B LLC 196 W GOLF COURSE RD LOGAN UT 84341 LOWE'S HIW INC PO BOX 1000 MOORESVILLE NC 28115 JACOBS, RYAN C 230 W 1300 S #8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ZACHARIAS, NATHAN 230 W 1300 S #9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HENDERSON, ELENA K; JTHENDERSON, MICHAEL S; JT 230 W 1300 S #10 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAGARACI, ISABEL 230 W 1300 S #11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MYRICK, TREVOR 230 W 1300 S #12 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NEWBERRY, ARIA; JTPASSEY, NICHOLAS C; JT 230 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDREA B MITTON LIV TRMITTON, ANDREA B; TR 230 W 1300 S #14 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CW THE LUCY, LLC 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 PUPAIBOOL, JAKRAPUN 942 W LOTUS BROOK DR SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84119 MORGAN STEWART INVESTMENTS,LLC 230 W 1300 S #2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROBINSON, JASON R 7438 S DAN DR WEST JORDAN UT 84084 ERICKSEN, CHELSEA 230 W 1300 S #4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINS, MICHAEL G 230 W 1300 S #5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 URWIN, JEREMY 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 RICHARDS, CODY 230 W 1300 S #7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LING, MENG C 230 W 1300 S #29 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CROSSBOW PROPERTIES LLC 8143 COURTYARD LOOP PARK CITY UT 84098 GOTHBERG, SPENCER 230 W 1300 S #31 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKS, KRISTINA R 230 W 1300 S #32 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SQUIRES, BROOKE 230 W 1300 S #33 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FITZGERALD, MARISSA V 230 W 1300 S #34 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SIDDEEK, HANI 230 W 1300 S #35 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KUSHNER, JOSHUA 230 W 1300 S #22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MCLEOD, SUSAN; JTMCLEOD, CHRISTOPHER; JT 230 W 1300 S #23 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MATTHEWS, SHAUN 230 W 1300 S #24 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PAN, JANE Y; JTTAN, HAI B; JT 741 E 600 N ROOSEVELT UT 84066 LAPP, ROBERT ANDREW 230 W 1300 S #26 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, GABRIELLA L 230 W 1300 S #27 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SASICH, MICHAEL J 230 W 1300 S #28 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PETERSEN, LANDONPETERSEN, JAXON 230 W 1300 S #15 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEWOLF FAM TRDEWOLF, JANICE B; TR 1250 S NEVADA AVE PROVO UT 84606 HANSEN, JINKY GATUTEO JTHANSEN, TYLER STEVEN JT 230 W 1300 S #17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WONG, DENISE 230 W 1300 S #18 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CHERNENKO, ALLA JTVAN HUELE, YANNICK JT 230 W 1300 S #19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROTTER, ERIN; JTSANDERS, SAMUEL; JT 230 W 1300 S #20 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BUSHNELL, DAVID W; JTBROCKSCHMIDT, VERONICA L; JT 230 W 1300 S #21 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUCY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVILLE UT 84014 ELLEFSEN, GIANNI 3010 S RICHMOND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 WARD, CLINT Z 179 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WHITLOCK, CAMERON T 175 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARLICK, SANDRA L 170 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KETCH, GREGORY C &KAREN A; JT 655 E 100 N ALPINE UT 84004 URBAN SENSE, LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 DOWLER ENTERPRISES LLC 1112 N 1100 W FARMINGTON UT 84025 DICKSON, KYLE 141 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GREENE, CHARLES A 137 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALL, KIM C 133 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JALALPOUR, JALEE 4121 WEBSTER ST OAKLAND CA 94609 KREMER, JORDAN 125 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HUGHES, DON R 121 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F; JT 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TUIFUA, SIAOSI K &TUPOU F & SULIETI; TC 178 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GOODRICH, BENJAMIN P 174 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LEMASTER PROPERTIES, LLC 8084 S 1700 E SANDY UT 84093 HILDEBRAND, DANIELLE 1055 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LUND, JENNY E &CHRISTIANSEN, KEVIN; JT 160 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GASS, PATRICK R 156 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KING, LARRY E, JR 150 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MILLS, DEXTER M; JTOVESON, JESSICA; JT 146 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ENGLAND, GEORGE M 211 E TRUMAN AVE SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 ELLIS, JODY R; JTELLIS, RONALD W; JT 130 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DEMILLE, JANIE A 132 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ARIAS, JOSE G 140 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COBIAN, ANA D S 3683 S RIVER HORSE RD WEST VALLEY UT 84119 VIDAL, ARYS Q JR 122 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOOD, JAMES V 118 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WOO, DAVID 2826 E DIMPLE DELL RD SANDY UT 84092 YBARRA, PETER E 1174 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 YBARRA, PATRICIA; SURVET AL 1178 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1182 WEST TEMPLE, LLC 805 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HUGHES, LAUREN 1188 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WRIGHT, ANTHONY P; JTWRIGHT, MERRICK C; JT 1192 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN SENSE LLC 10962 S MANITOU WY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 KIM, SU H; JTBAE, JUNHYUK; JT 155 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 GARCIA, RUTH 125 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TANAKA, MELISSA R; JTTANAKA, ROGER H JR; JT 121 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ESMAY, RYAN K; JTCANENGUEZ, ANDREA M C; JT 119 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SAGONA, JORDAN M 117 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ZOBRIST, KARLY A 115 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HERNANDEZ, POMPILIO O 111 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 RAEMHILD, IAN 105 W LUCY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HALEY, MICHELE R 2967 E MORNINGSIDE DR HOLLADAY UT 84124 SCHEAR, ADAM G 1208 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MERICA, CADE S; JTMERICA, STEVIE Z; JT 1212 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KOCHERHANS, STEVEN 1216 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 URBAN INDIAN CENTER OF SALTLAKE 1220 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 INDIAN WALK-IN CENTER INC 120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUTHLAND CORP, THE PO BOX 711 DALLAS TX 75221 S L C CORPORATION PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 OIKOS 8 LLC 1185 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JENSEN, MARC R 1056 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 SALT LAKE CITY BOARD OFEDUCATION 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BFR, LLC 907 E 250 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BFR, LLC 185 S STATE ST #800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1300 BALLPARK, LLC 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 VINA, SHERRY &ANTHONY D; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 BIJCO LLC 8704 S SUGARLOAF DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 RJL, LTD 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JEFFERSON STREET LLC PO BOX 571217 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84157 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 1349 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY CORP 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CURRENT OCCUPANT 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT UT 84101 JUDD JONES REFRACTORY &ACID SPECIALTIES INC 2904 MILLCREEK CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 JEFFERSON BALLPARK, LLC 1240 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 VILLAS AT 1400 SOUTHHOLDINGS, LP 595 S RIVERWOODS PKWY LOGAN UT 84321 RICK & MEG OSGUTHORPE REV LIVTRUST 02/05/2023; ET AL 58 S TROUT LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 SHELTER THE HOMELESS, INC 242 W PARAMOUNT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LIBERTY BALLPARK OWNER, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 TABRIZ, SATTAR N 1429 E ROOSEVELT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 RENPRO TWO, LLC 6434 S 1650 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84121 HOME BASE APARTMENTS, LLC 3211 W STARLITE DR WEST JORDAN UT 84088 P STREET INVESTMENTS, LC 1328 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 SANDSTONE CAFE LLC 2182 E BALD EAGLE CT DRAPER UT 84020 FIREFIGHTERS CREDIT UNION 124 W 1400 S #101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BALL PARK APARTMENTS, LP 1380 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEER RUN TIMBER, LLC 8919 S RED WILLOW CIR SANDY UT 84093 KNAPHUS, BRADLEY R 1410 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CR TOWNEGATE COMMUNITIES, LLC 444 W BEECH ST SAN DIEGO CA 92101 RUECO, LLC; 41.46%TRADITION POINTE LLC; 58.54% 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 THOMAS, BRYSON 105-109 W 1400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3855 S 500 W SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 JOHNSON, RONALD K 1416 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECO, LLCTRADITION POINTE LLC 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 VICTORIA JOURDIN, LLC 38 S NORTHRIDGE WY SANDY UT 84092 YUCATAN LLC 540 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 OLIVER, ANGELA 1116 N SONATA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 CHIDAMBARAM, PRIYADHARSHINI 1421 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILLIAMS, MICHELLE L; JTWILLIAMS, ZACHARY R; JT 1429 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SILVA, DANIEL S; JTSILVA, MCKENZIE T; JT 68 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MISAKA, MARY S 62 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANKHEAD, STANLEY J 1388 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RABAGLIA, JOSEPH 1396 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAWRENCE, ASHLEY &MAUSS, ANDREW; JT 1400 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLADE, CHRISTOPHER L; ET AL 1404 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CASH, GARY L 3 S ALTAWOOD DR SANDY UT 84092 CARLSEN, ERIKA 1418 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DUNCOMBE, EARL D &RENAE; JT 4051 S 3200 W WEST VALLEY UT 84119 MERRIMAC RENTALS, LLC 4893 GLENHOLLOW CIR OCEANSIDE CA 92057 SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 MUNICIPAL BUILDING AUTHORITYOF SLC 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 FAJARDO, HIRAM H; JTKINSLEY-HERNANDEZ, JESSICA; JT 1381 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAPIA-GUZMAN, JULIO CESAR 7617 NE 1ST CT MIAMI FL 33138 MENZEL, JORDAN 1399 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 EKEY, MADISON; JTMEDLER, JONATHAN; JT 1401 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DERBIDGE, CHRIS &ROSIELER; JT 1407 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MONOCHROMATIC LLC 553 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 2174 S MAIN ST SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 MERRIMAC PARTNERS, LLC 1430 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH PRIDE CENTER PO BOX 1078 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1360 S MAIN, LLC 1360 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 OMAHONY, RYAN E 32 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALLISON, JOHN B &TONI L; JT 30 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HOU, JIN HUA 286 E SNOWY RIVER CT SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 WHALEY, BRIAN; JTHAWKINS, AMY; JT 26 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NELSON, RICHELLE L 24 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BBP INTERMOUNTAIN 1494 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WOLF, THOMAS &KIMBERLY; JT 1478 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HAYDEN, JAMES H &WEST, SCOTT E; JT 1488 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1500 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CALL, LUCY 1502 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DENISTON, SHAWN J; ET AL 1748 E MOUNTAIN VIEW DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 HIGHCLIFF PROPERTYMANAGEMENT, LLC PO BOX 526110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 GABBOTT, LEWIS 1469 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MAY, MARLIN D 1475 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LEBOUTILLIER, SHAWN T 1481 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOWEN, DONALD E; JTGOWEN, LAUREN V O; JT 1487 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANDERSON, ADAM &AMANDA; JT 246 E HAMPTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAMPTON, MARY A M; JTET AL 65 W MERRIMAC AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FLETCHER LEE STUMPH TRSTUMPH, FLETCHER; TR 1454 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ATWOOD, KIMBERLY M &GIBSON, STEVEN D; TC 1460 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JENNINGS, PAT &THOMAS L; JT 1470 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROWLAND, ANDREW C 1476 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TAYLOR, CLAYTON R; JTMECHAM, SHELBIE A; JT 1482 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KETTLE CREEK PROPERTIES, LLC 13087 S 1300 W RIVERTON UT 84065 MIDDLETON, DORIS &SWARTZ, FLORENCE; JT 1494 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HIGGINSON, MONIQUE C; JTOBORN, CRAIG; JT 930 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, ET AL 1 EQUITY WY WESTLAKE OH 44145 KUNGA, THUPTEN &DOLMA, PHURBU; JT 64 W ANDREW AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TALLEY FAM LIV TRET AL 1964 E GYRFALCON DR SANDY UT 84092 RICHARDS0408 LLC 12786 S 600 E DRAPER UT 84020 TRAN DO REV TRTRAN, ANNA; TR 1859 W SIR JAMES DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BERGERA, JORDAN E; JTNINOWSKI, TIMOTHY J; JT 1455 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1463 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHULZ, JASON 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HYMAS, ANTHONY L; JTHYMAS, JULIE A; JT 1475 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GLASGOW, ROBERT E; JTGLASGOW, TIFFANY S; JT 1340 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JENNINGS-HILL, TIMOTHY 1487 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 YAMAGATA, MAKI 1491 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOHNS, KEELAN 2320 S 2100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GABBOTT'S ROW, LLC 650 S 500 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 C Z PROPERTIES LLC 1476 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARCIA, RASHELL C 1484 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATIONASSOCIATION A NON-PROFIT CORP 1488 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEFF SANDSTROM LIV TRSANDSTROM, JEFF; TR 35 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FOUR HOLDINGS, INC 1530 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GARFF ENTERPROSES, INC 777 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 BROWN, BILL B, TR 3433 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GARFF ENTERPRISES INC 64 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 FOOD FORWARD HOLDINGS, LLC 439 E SEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HANSEN & HANSEN PROPERTIES LLC 5840 S HOLLADAY BLVD HOLLADAY UT 84121 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GRANDEUR PROPERTIES LLC 858 S STATE ST #3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SHELTER THE HOMELESS II LC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CITY CREEK HOSPITALITY, LLC,LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 ANDERSON, THOMAS E 3178 E VISTA BONITA CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 EVERGREENE CONSTRUCTION CO,LC 571 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CHEN'S INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 CHENS INTERNATIONAL CORP PO BOX 1385 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 DALE & LORILYN KINYON LIV TRET AL 1696 MUELLER PARK RD BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 RANDY TOPHAM PROPERTIES LLC 168 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 UNIQUE PROPERTIES, LLC 1677 E BURNING OAK DR DRAPER UT 84020 CREATESPACE SLC, LLC 2605 JEFFERSON AVE OGDEN UT 84401 FRESH START PROPERTIES LLC 1807 E VINTAGE OAK LN MURRAY UT 84121 KENTUCKY BOURBON LLC 832 E CLAYBOURNE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CLARK, MARION B; TRSET AL 2500 E ARNETT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 GREEN BEINGS LLC 563 E 3785 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84106 HODZIC, IRFAN &JASMINKA; JT 481 E 2700 S SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 CLATTERBUCK, ALISON O 1055 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 EVEREAL-ESTATE 2, LLC 11711 S GROVES MEADOW CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 PHOENIX WEST ENTERPRISE, LLC PO BOX 65694 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 OH MAI DOWNTOWN, INC 1102 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VASILIOU, GEORGE 1061 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCHOF SALT LAKE CITY 1090 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BECKSTRAND, DONALD S FAMILYLTD PARTNERSHIP 5727 S 675 E MURRAY UT 84107 ANDERSON, KATIE L 1144 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GODFREY, THOMAS; JTPACKER, KIERA K; JT 1150 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MAGAR, WILSON T 1154 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JORDAN, LAWRENCE W, JR 1160 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 RAEDER, RACHEL M 9 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SMITH, SEAN E; JTMARQUEZ, T'KEYA; JT 17 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 VINA, SHERRY & RHETT B; JT 3751 S WASATCH BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 DSPTOO, LLC 1111 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 KUANG FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC 1623 W MORNING VIEW WY LEHI UT 84043 BROUSE, DONALD &SHARON; JT 1136 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LEDO ENTERPRISES PO BOX 9167 SPRINGFIELD MO 65801 60E LLC 2840 E JENNIE LN HOLLADAY UT 84117 DYNASTY CONDOMINIUMOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1623 W MORNING VIEW WAY LEHI UT 84043 PEREZ, INMER 1029 S 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 VALINO, GABINO F &ROBIN L; JT 1149 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CASTRO, MCEDGAR G 1155 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CORONODO, CLAUDIA 1167 S FOULGER ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MARTINEZ, MARIO A 1535 S BRAVA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GRANT, TERI 1156 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILDING, THOMAS V 1162 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WALSTER, JOHN D; TR(JDWFT) PO BOX 65122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84165 KOTTWITZ, CASSINDA N 37 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 GHIMIRE, BISHNU 41 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 45 EAST KELSEY, LLC 1373 E SKYLINE DR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 SCHNEIDER PROPERTIES LLC 1207 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 HUXFORD, TYLER; JTZUNIGA, YESENIA; JT 50 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 MOORE, RYAN C; JTWILKINSON, OLIVIA E; JT 58 E KELSEY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1700 INVESTMENTS, LLC 1190 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 NATE WADE INVESTMENTCOMPANY 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BING KONG TONG INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 1213 MAJOR STREET LLC 1539 E MEADOWMOOR RD HOLLADAY UT 84117 1200 STATE PROPERTY LLC 1418 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 BING KONG TONG, INC PO BOX 735 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 GPKP, LLC 1220 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 LANDEN PROPERTIES LLC 13 E WANDERWOOD WY SANDY UT 84092 FREE WESLEYAN CHURCH OFTONGA IN UTAH 57 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DAGNEY GROUP LLC THE 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 THE DAGNEY GROUP, LLC 9424 S 300 W SANDY UT 84070 BMP II VENTURES, L.L.C.1343 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BMP VENTURES LLC 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 NATE WADE INVESTMENT 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 LOCKHART, DORINA C 1398 N 640 W WEST BOUNTIFUL UT 84087 NATE WADE INVESTMENT CO 1421 S AMBASSADOR WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BIG CHEEZ PROPERTY MANAGEMENTLLC 1345 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BROTHERS & SON RETAIL LLC 1302 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1324 SOUTH STATE, LLC PO BOX 31356 TAMPA FL 33631 VU, HAI T T 569 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 AXIOM PROPERTIES III, LLC 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SCHILLING, BRUCE C; TR 917 E MILLCREEK WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I;JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 KIM, JOONG Y &JONG I; JT 3880 E THOUSAND OAKS CIR MILLCREEK UT 84124 DEVARGAS, MARVINE M; TR 3774 S 400 E SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 1405 MAIN, LLC 2014 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 FAMILY HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 J & S AUTO SERVICE INC 1433 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGSLLC PO BOX 9948 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 THOMAS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS,LLC 1163 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 PEREZ ENTERPRISES, INC 2774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 JOHNSON, JORDAN 23 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DALIPE, DEN M T; JTLAYDA, NATHALIE J C; JT 25 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILKINS, HEATHER R 29 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LE, TRUC T 33 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOR-LOKKEN,SNOWOWLWOLFESCHLEGELSTEINH 1392 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HRM REAL ESTATE, LLC 5267 W SUN BLOOM CIR HERRIMAN UT 84096 CATALAN PROPERTIES LLC 215 S 400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CATALAN PROPERTIES, L.L.C 1383 S MAJOR ST #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THOMAS, DANIEL 1389 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SOUZA LAND LLC 2230 DOC HOLLIDAY DR PARK CITY UT 84060 FOUNDRY PROPERTIES LLC 722 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 WASATCH INN, LLC 1009 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1438 S PROPERTIES LLC 3424 S STATE ST #A SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84115 GJACK ENTERPRISES LLC 59 E CLEVELAND AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BIG WORLD PROPERTY LLC 8126 S HIDDEN SPRINGS CV SANDY UT 84094 CONDIE MAIN STREET HOLDINGS LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 PSAMMOSLIN LLC 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 BRIGHT BOLIDE LLC 976 E FOURTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 STATE OF UTAH DIV FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION & MGMT 450 N STATE OFFICE #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 BEEHIVE STATE EMPLOYEESCREDIT UNION 40 NE LOOP 410 STE 607 SAN ANTONIO TX 78216 UTAH STATE BUILDINGOWNERSHIP AUTHORITY 450 N STATE ST #4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1725 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 MAJOR STREET BUILDING LC 4625 W 4100 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 RASMUSSEN, L NEIL &SALLY A; TRS 7988 S STAUNING CV COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 WASATCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1085 N MAIN ST BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 BEN NELSON TRUST 12/14/2022NELSON, BENNY E; TR 1481 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WULFPAK PRODUCTIONS LLC 1483 S MAJOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1485 MAJOR STREET, LLC 110 MATTERHORN DR PARK CITY UT 84098 MATTINGLY, PHILIP R TR PO BOX 375 HEBER CITY UT 84032 ATK, LLC 1017 W HIDDEN COVE DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 SUES ALTERATION UT INC 1441 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 KHANAL, BIPLOB; JTSHARMA, UMA; JT 1480 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BVT LLC 1484 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LASSETER, LINDA D 1463 S EDISON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LOTUS 1492 STATE, LLC 338 E SOUTHTEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 JKC LLC 2843 E WATER VISTA WY SANDY UT 84093 NGUYEN, VINH; JTVO, LOAN; JT 1774 W 3500 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 OSTROWSKI PEARCE LIV TRET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GOSSELIN-URIBE, ALEXANDRE; JTLOUGHLIN, EMILY Q; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUSTESEN, STEPHEN M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MANNAN, BEENISH; JTRAHIM, FAHIM; JT 2850 SUMMIT DR POCATELLO ID 83201 PETERSON, CLAIRE 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GRAVES, LINCOLN R; JTWEISBERG, BRENT M; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #F SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SMITH, BRADY; JTPATEL, CHANDANI; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE # G SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SINGH, SAHIBA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #H SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUNDQUIST, TAYLOR B; JTLUNDQUIST, LISA K; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #J SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 UHLIG, KYLE; JTUHLIG, ANAHI N; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #K SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DANIEL HOUPT AND SHAWNA CUANTRUST; ET AL 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #L SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RUECK, JOSEPH E; JTRUESCK, LAUREN E; JT 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #M SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JIANG, ZIYANG 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LAM, TUNG X 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #P SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCHREYER, TANNER 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #Q SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEHERRERA, SAMANTHA A 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #R SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BANASIK, CLAYTON 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SORRENTINO, DIANA M 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #T SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 APHICO, LLC 1055 E LAFAYETTE ST SANDY UT 84094 PATEL, RUPA 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #V SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 M15 LOFTS CONDOMINIUMASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 5555 DRAPER UT 84020 Current Occupant 945 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 951 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 961 S WASHINGTON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 964 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 966 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 970 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 943 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 947 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 969 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 971 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 936 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 942 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 954 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 956 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 965 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 223 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 215 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 933 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 935 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 937 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 959 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 46 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 940 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 960 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 24 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 52 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 80 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 939 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 949 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 975 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W BROOKLYN AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1018 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1024 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1050 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1098 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1039 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1055 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1046 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1015 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1075 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1062 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 120 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 111 W MEAD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1025 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1043 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 124 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1002 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1008 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1010 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1012 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1061 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1095 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1101 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1103 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 175 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 149 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 135 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 168 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 158 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 154 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 148 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 136 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 122 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 110 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1085 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 185 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 163 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 157 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 145 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1143 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 166 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 160 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 138 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 134 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 128 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 987 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 65 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1020 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 36 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1099 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1041 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 995 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1000 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1011 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1070 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1116 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 60 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 56 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1152 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 35 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 31 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 25 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 21 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1127 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1133 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1139 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1155 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1159 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1171 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1150 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1164 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1172 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 121 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 125 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 127 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 131 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 133 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #2 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #3 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #4 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #5 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #6 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #7 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #8 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #9 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #10 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #11 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST #12 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1028 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 218 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 216 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1148 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 227 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 211 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 232 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 222 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 220 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 224 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 225 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 208 W LUCY AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 203 W PAXTON AVE #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 238 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 228 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #11 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #13 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #1 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #3 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #6 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #30 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #25 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S #16 Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 230 W 1300 S ##COM2 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1167 S 200 W Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 173 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 165 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 159 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 147 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 129 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 182 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 170 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 164 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 142 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 140 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 130 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 126 W LUCY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1170 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1174 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1178 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1182 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1188 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1192 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 155 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 151 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1204 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1208 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1212 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1216 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1220 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 180 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 55 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1186 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1234 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1285 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 34 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1270 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84101 Current Occupant 1338 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 135 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1309 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1317 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1321 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1333 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1339 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1306 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1308 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1310 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1312 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1314 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 77 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 150 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1386 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1390 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1445 S 300 W Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 208 W PARAMOUNT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1365 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 126 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1358 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1370 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 127 W ALBERMARLE AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1385 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1394 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 124 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1404 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 149 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1425 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 105 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 119 W 1400 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1355 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1409 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1417 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1429 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1422 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 50 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1395 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1415 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1414 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1380 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S MAIN ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 W MERRIMAC AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1494 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1478 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1502 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1450 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1447 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1455 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1461 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1469 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1487 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1493 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1451 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1501 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1497 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 68 W ANDREW AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1500 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1431 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1449 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1481 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1499 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1498 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1530 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 20 E 900 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 958 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1017 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1025 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 21 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 999 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 998 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1035 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1007 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1009 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1019 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1000 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1004 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1010 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1016 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1026 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1030 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1045 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1077 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1085 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1101 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 50 E HERBERT AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1051 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1050 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1062 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1084 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1175 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 19 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1141 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1147 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1151 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1157 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1142 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1148 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1152 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1156 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1122 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 60 E HARVARD AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #201 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #202 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #204 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #206 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #205 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #208 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #203 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #101 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1158 S STATE ST #102 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1145 S FOULGER ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1146 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1150 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 33 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 45 E KELSEY AVE Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1185 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1222 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1207 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST #REAR Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1209 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1213 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1225 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1200 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1216 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 85 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1241 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1212 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84111 Current Occupant 1325 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 28 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1345 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1337 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 40 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 60 E 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1325 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1331 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1335 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1318 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1324 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1330 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1332 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1340 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1350 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1357 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1361 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1375 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1381 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1364 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1376 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1398 S MAJOR ST #NFF Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1406 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1412 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1420 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1448 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1359 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1363 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1379 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1383 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1393 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1397 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1401 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1405 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1374 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1382 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1388 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1392 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1400 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1410 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1416 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1438 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1411 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1421 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1356 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1475 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1479 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1476 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1496 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1457 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1467 S MAIN ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 38 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1482 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1490 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 48 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 54 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 58 E CLEVELAND AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1453 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1463 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1471 S MAJOR ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 47 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 65 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1458 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1460 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1470 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1472 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1488 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1492 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1504 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 1446 S STATE ST Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #D Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE #U Salt Lake City UT 84115 Current Occupant 15 E KENSINGTON AVE Salt Lake City UT 84115 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: April 2, 2024 RE:MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments PLNPCM2023-00959 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: April 2, 2024 Set Date: April 2, 2024 Public Hearing: May 7, 2024 Potential Action: May 21, 2024 ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposal that would amend sections chapter 21A.46 Signs to establish the sign regulations for the proposed Form Based Mixed Use 8 (MU-8) zoning district. This is a City initiated zoning text amendment that would help implement the vision and goals of the Ballpark Station Area Plan. The proposed amendments establish a variety of sign types in the zone, which are intended to provide appropriate signage primarily oriented to pedestrian and mass transit. This petition is related to the Ballpark Station Area Rezone and Text Amendments (PLNPCM2023-00169) that the Council is considering concurrent to this petition. According to the transmittal letter, most sign types require a review and approval by the City and issuance of a building permit prior to installation. If sign regulations are not established for the MU-8 zone, very limited signage would be allowed in the zone such as building security signs, small public safety signs, and house number signs which are exempt from sign regulations. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in support of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council. Page | 2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Below is a summary of the key changes, See pages 2-3 of the transmittal letter for further information. 1.Amendments to 21A.46.096 – Sign Regulations for Form Based Districts a. Amend the sign regulations for Form Based Districts to also include sign regulations for Form Based Mixed Use Districts. b. Add the MU-8 zone to the sign type specification tables. See chapter 21A.46.020 for sign type definitions. The following sign types would be permitted in the MU- 8 zone: o A frame o Awning or Canopy o Construction o Flat o Flat Sign Building Orientation o Marquee o Monument o Nameplate o New Development o Private Directional o Projecting o Projecting Parking Entry o Real Estate o Window 2. Amendments to 21A.46.125.B.3.d – Vintage Signs a. Add MU-8 to the list of zoning districts in which vintage signs can be relocated to for use as a piece of public art, subject to meeting specific requirements: o Original design and character of sign is retained or restored o The sign advertises a business no longer in operation Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Salt Lake City Council – April 2, 2024 PLNPCM2023-00959 TEXT AMENDMENT // MU-8 ZONE SIGN REGULATIONS Salt Lake City // Planning Division ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT Amend 21A.46 Signs to establish on- site sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council. REQUEST Salt Lake City // Planning Division DETAILS •Modifications to 21A.46.096 •Signs for Form Based Districts PROPOSAL Salt Lake City // Planning Division •21A.46.125 – Vintage Signs •Vintage Signs can be relocated to MU-8 zone for use as public art PROPOSAL Salt Lake City // Planning Division PLANNING COMMISSION •Recommended approval of the zoning text amendments. RECOMMENDATION Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Brooke Olson // Principal Planner Brooke.olson@slcgov.com 801-535-7118 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: 03/20/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: 03/20/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/19/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods SUBJECT: PLNPCM2023-00959 - MU-8 Zone Sign Text Amendments STAFF CONTACT: Brooke Olson, Principal Planner brooke.olson@slcgov.com, 801-535-7118 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopt the zoning text amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City initiated this petition to amend sections of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use Subdistrict 8. Specifically, amendments to chapter 21A.46 Signs, which addresses sign regulations in each zoning district. The proposed amendments are intended to establish sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zoning district. The MU-8 zone is proposed to be created and mapped in the center of the Ballpark Station Master Plan Area under petition PLNPCM2023-00169, the Ballpark Station Area Rezones. The proposed MU-8 zone is a high density form based mixed use district, allowing buildings up to 8 stories in height and intended to facilitate the creation of high density pedestrian oriented developments. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zone on October 25, 2023 and recommended approval to the City Council. The proposal is currently in the process of being transmitted to the Council Office. Since petitions PLNPCM2023-00169 and PLNPCM2023- SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 rachel otto (Mar 20, 2024 09:32 MDT) 00959 are associated with creating regulations for the proposed MU-8 zone, the council may want to consider scheduling the briefings and public hearing for both petitions simultaneously if transmitted to Council Staff within similar timeframes. Chapter 21A.46 establishes sign regulations for each of the City’s Zoning Districts. The regulations specify sign quantity, size, and placement regulations for various sign types permitted in each zone. Several sign types are exempt from the City’s sign regulations, however, most sign types require a review and approval by the City and issuance of a building permit prior to installation. If sign regulations are not established for the MU-8 zone, very limited signage would be allowed in the zone such as building security signs, small public safety signs, and house number signs which are exempt from sign regulations. The proposed amendments establish a variety of sign types in the zone, which are intended to provide appropriate signage primarily oriented to the pedestrian and mass transit. In comparison to the City’s high density commercial zones, proposed signage in the MU-8 zone is more pedestrian oriented, and limited in terms of sign types, size, and quantity. The MU-8 sign regulations are proposed to be located within chapter 21A.46.096, sign regulations for Form Based Districts and created to be consistent with the sign regulations for the newly adopted FB-MU11, Form Based Mixed Use 11 zone (previously titled FB-UN3). While the FB-MU11 and MU-8 zones vary in terms of some use and bulk regulations, both zones are high density form based mixed use zones intended to create quality pedestrian-oriented developments. Both zones consist of similar development regulations and seen as having similar needs for signage, therefore treated the same in regard to sign controls. Summary of Proposed Changes The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being proposed to establish sign regulations for the MU-8 Zone: 1. Amendments to 21A.46.096 – Sign Regulations for Form Based Districts • Amend the sign regulations for Form Based Districts to also include sign regulations for Form Based Mixed Use Districts. • Add the MU-8 zone to the sign type specification tables. See chapter 21A.46.020 for sign type definitions. The following sign types would be permitted in the MU- 8 zone: o A-Frame o Awning or Canopy o Construction o Flat o Flat Sign Building Orientation o Marquee o Monument o Nameplate o New Development o Private Directional o Projecting o Projecting Parking Entry o Real Estate o Window 2. Amendments to 21A.46.125.B.3.d – Vintage Signs • Add MU-8 to the list of zoning districts in which vintage signs can be relocated to for use as a piece of public art, subject to meeting specific requirements: o Original design and character of sign is retained or restored o The sign advertises a business no longer in operation PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the application was initiated: • December 8, 2023 – An online open house posted to the Planning Division’s website. • December 8, 2023 – Salt Lake City’s Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. • January 4, 2024 - Planning Staff presented the proposal at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. • January 4, 2024 – Planning Commission held a public hearing. No members of the public spoke to the petition. Staff has not received any public comment regarding the proposed text amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of January 24, 2024 b) PC Minutes of January 24, 2024 c) Planning Commission Memo of January 24, 2024 EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Petition Initiation Request ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST 1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the 5 Salt Lake City Code to establish sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 6 Subdistrict) 7 8 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 9 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959 to create sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed 10 Use 8 Subdistrict. 11 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 12 public hearing on January 24, 2024 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 13 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 14 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 15 establish sign regulations for that subdistrict. 16 WHEREAS, at its January 24, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 17 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 18 petition; and 19 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 20 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 22 23 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.46.096. That 24 Section 21A.46.096 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Form Based 25 Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 26 21A.46.096: SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE FORM BASED AND FORM BASED 27 MIXED USE DISTRICTS: 28 29 The following regulations shall apply to signs permitted in the form based code and form LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2 30 based mixed use zoning districts. Any sign not expressly permitted by these district 31 regulations is prohibited. 32 33 A. Sign Regulations for the Form Based Code and Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 34 1. Purpose: Sign regulations for the form based code and form based mixed use zoning 35 districts are intended to provide appropriate signage oriented primarily to pedestrian 36 and mass transit traffic. 37 2. Applicability: This subsection applies to all signs located within the form based code 38 and form based mixed use zoning districts. This subsection is intended to list all 39 permitted signs in the zone. All other regulations in this chapter shall apply. 40 B. Sign Type, Size and Height Standards: 41 1. A-Frame Sign: 42 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 43 44 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 3 46 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU- 8 Specifications A-frame sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 2 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Placement On public sidewalk or private property. Obstruction free area Minimum of 8 feet must be maintained at all times for pedestrian passage. 47 48 2. Awning or Canopy Sign: 49 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4 50 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Awning or canopy sign P P P P P P Quantity 1 per window or entrance. Width Equal to the width of the window. Projection No maximum depth from building facade, however design subject to mitigation of rainfall and snowfall runoff, conflict avoidance with tree canopy, and issuance of encroachment permits where required. The awning or canopy can project a maximum of 2 feet into a special purpose corridor. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet of vertical clearance. Letters and logos Allowed on vertical portions of sign only. Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face a special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 51 52 3. Construction Sign: 53 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Construction sign (see definition in this chapter) P P P P P P Quantity 1 per construction site. Height Maximum of 8 feet. Maximum of 12 feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Area Maximum of 64 square feet. Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor, but must be located on private property. 54 55 4. Flat Sign: 56 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Flat sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. No maximum width in FB-MU and MU-8. Height Maximum of 3 feet. No maximum height in FB-MU and MU- 8. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of store frontage. Projection Maximum of 1 foot. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 6 57 58 5. Flat Sign (building orientation): 59 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Flat sign (building orientation) P P Quantity 1 per building face. Height May not extend above the roof line or top of parapet wall. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 60 61 6. Marquee Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Marquee sign P P Quantity 1 per building. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. Height May not extend above the roof of the building. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. Projection Maximum of 6 feet. May project into right of way a maximum of 4 feet provided the sign is a minimum of 12 feet above the sidewalk grade. 62 63 7. Monument Sign: 64 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 7 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Monument sign P P Quantity 1 per building. Setback 5 feet. Height Maximum of 20 feet. Area 1 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 65 66 8. Nameplate Sign: 67 68 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 69 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Nameplate sign P P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Area Maximum of 3 square feet. 70 71 9. New Development Sign: Sign Type FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications New Development sign P P Quantity 1 per street frontage. Setback 5 feet. Height 12 feet. Area 200 square feet. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 8 72 10. Private Directional Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Private directional sign (see definition in this chapter) P P P P P P Quantity No limit. Height Maximum of 5 feet. Area Maximum of 8 square feet. Restriction May not contain business name or logo. Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 73 74 11. Projecting Sign: 75 76 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 77 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB-SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Projecting sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway. Area 6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total. Projection Maximum of 4 feet from building façade. Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 9 78 12. Projecting Parking Entry Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Projecting P P P P Quantity 1 per parking entry. parking Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway. entry sign Height Maximum of 2 feet. (see Area 4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total. projecting sign graphic) Projection Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet within the special purpose corridor. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 79 80 13. Public Safety Sign: 81 82 83 84 85 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 10 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Public P P P P P P Quantity No limit. safety sign Height Maximum of 6 feet. (see Area 8 square feet. definition in this Projection Maximum of 1 foot. chapter) Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 86 87 14. Real Estate Sign: 88 89 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 90 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Real estate sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Height Maximum of 12 feet. Area 32 square feet. 64 square feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 11 91 15. Window Sign: 92 93 [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 94 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Window sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per window. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Area Maximum of 25% of window area. 95 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 12 96 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of Salt Lake City 97 Code. That Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Vintage 98 Signs), shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 99 d. Be relocated to a new site for use as a piece of public art, provided that the 100 original design and character of the sign is retained, or will be restored, and it 101 advertises a business no longer in operation. Vintage signs may only be relocated 102 for use as public art to sites in the following districts: D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, G-MU, 103 CSHBD1, CSHBD2, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, FB-SE, MU-8, TSA. 104 105 SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 106 first publication. 107 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. 108 109 110 111 CHAIRPERSON 112 113 ATTEST: 114 115 116 CITY RECORDER 117 118 119 Transmitted to Mayor on . 120 121 Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. 122 123 124 125 MAYOR 126 127 128 CITY RECORDER 129 130 (SEAL) 131 132 Bill No. of 2024. 133 Published: . 134 135 Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 signs (legislative)_v1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of the Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to establish sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959 to create sign regulations for the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 24, 2024 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00959) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish sign regulations for that subdistrict. WHEREAS, at its January 24, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.46.096. That Section 21A.46.096 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Form Based Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 21A.46.096: SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE FORM BASED AND FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS: The following regulations shall apply to signs permitted in the form based and form based 2 mixed use zoning districts. Any sign not expressly permitted by these district regulations is prohibited. A. Sign Regulations for the Form Based and Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 1. Purpose: Sign regulations for the form based and form based mixed use zoning districts are intended to provide appropriate signage oriented primarily to pedestrian and mass transit traffic. 2. Applicability: This subsection applies to all signs located within the form based and form based mixed use zoning districts. This subsection is intended to list all permitted signs in the zone. All other regulations in this chapter shall apply. B. Sign Type, Size and Height Standards: 1. A-Frame Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 3 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU- 8 Specifications A-frame sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 2 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Any portion of the frame (the support structure) may extend up to 6 inches in any direction beyond the sign face. Placement On public sidewalk or private property. Obstruction free area Minimum of 8 feet must be maintained at all times for pedestrian passage. 2. Awning or Canopy Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] 4 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Awning or canopy sign P P P P P P Quantity 1 per window or entrance. Width Equal to the width of the window. Projection No maximum depth from building facade, however design subject to mitigation of rainfall and snowfall runoff, conflict avoidance with tree canopy, and issuance of encroachment permits where required. The awning or canopy can project a maximum of 2 feet into a special purpose corridor. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet of vertical clearance. Letters and logos Allowed on vertical portions of sign only. Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face a special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 3. Construction Sign: 5 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Construction sign (see definition in this chapter) P P P P P P Quantity 1 per construction site. Height Maximum of 8 feet. Maximum of 12 feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Area Maximum of 64 square feet. Location permitted Private property or a public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor, but must be located on private property. 4. Flat Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Flat sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. No maximum width in FB-MU and MU-8. Height Maximum of 3 feet. No maximum height in FB-MU and MU- 8. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of store frontage. Projection Maximum of 1 foot. 6 5. Flat Sign (building orientation): Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Flat sign (building orientation) P P Quantity 1 per building face. Height May not extend above the roof line or top of parapet wall. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 6. Marquee Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Marquee sign P P Quantity 1 per building. Width Maximum of 90% of width of leasable space. Height May not extend above the roof of the building. Area 11/2 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. Projection Maximum of 6 feet. May project into right of way a maximum of 4 feet provided the sign is a minimum of 12 feet above the sidewalk grade. 7. Monument Sign: 7 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Monument sign P P Quantity 1 per building. Setback 5 feet. Height Maximum of 20 feet. Area 1 square feet per linear foot of building frontage. 8. Nameplate Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Nameplate sign P P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Area Maximum of 3 square feet. 9. New Development Sign: Sign Type FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU FB-SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications New Development sign P P Quantity 1 per street frontage. Setback 5 feet. Height 12 feet. Area 200 square feet. 8 10. Private Directional Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Private P P P P P P Quantity No limit. directional Height Maximum of 5 feet. sign (see Area Maximum of 8 square feet. definition in Restriction May not contain business name or logo. this chapter) Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 11. Projecting Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB-SC FB- SE MU-8 Specifications Projecting sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway. Area 6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total. Projection Maximum of 4 feet from building façade. Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 9 12. Projecting Parking Entry Sign: Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Projecting P P P P Quantity 1 per parking entry. parking Clearance Minimum of 10 feet above sidewalk/walkway. entry sign Height Maximum of 2 feet. (see Area 4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total. projecting sign graphic) Projection Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet within the special purpose corridor. Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 13. Public Safety Sign: 10 Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Public P P P P P P Quantity No limit. safety sign Height Maximum of 6 feet. (see Area 8 square feet. definition in this Projection Maximum of 1 foot. chapter) Location Private property or public street. Signs can face permitted the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 14. Real Estate Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Real estate sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners may have 2. Height Maximum of 12 feet. Area 32 square feet. 64 square feet in FB-MU and MU-8. Location permitted Private property or public street. Signs can face the special purpose corridor but must be located on private property. All signs are subject to the requirements of the revocable permitting process. 11 15. Window Sign: [Codifier: image remains unchanged.] Sign Type FB- UN1 FB- UN2 FB- MU FB- SC FB-SE MU-8 Specifications Window sign P P P P P Quantity 1 per window. Height Maximum of 3 feet. Area Maximum of 25% of window area. ____________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City Att SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of Salt Lake City Code. That Subsection 21A.46.125.B.3.d of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Vintage Signs), shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: d. Be relocated to a new site for use as a piece of public art, provided that the original design and character of the sign is retained, or will be restored, and it advertises a business no longer in operation. Vintage signs may only be relocated for use as public art to sites in the following districts: D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, G-MU, CSHBD1, CSHBD2, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, FB-SE, MU-8, TSA. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance adopting FB-MU8 signs (final)_v1 12 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: March 11, 2024 By: _ K orney 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00959 Nov. 2021 Salt Lake City initiated the creation of a small area plan within the Ballpark Neighborhood, The Ballpark Station Area Plan. Oct. 18 2022 The Ballpark Station Area Plan was adopted by Salt Lake City Council. Mar. 1, 2023 Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning map and zoning text amendment petition to implement the recommendations in the Ballpark Station Area Plan and rezone properties within the boundaries of the plan. The proposal included the creation of a new zone, the proposed MU-8 zoning district. Nov. 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00959 assigned to Brooke Olson, Principal Planner. Dec. 8 2023 An online open house posted to the Planning Division’s website. Dec. 8, 2023 Salt Lake City’s Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Jan. 4, 2024 Planning Staff presented the proposal at the Ballpark Community Council meeting to solicit feedback on the proposal and answer questions. Jan. 11, 2024 Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing property signs are posted in the project area. Jan. 24, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the petition and voted to recommend the City Council adopt the proposed zoning text amendments. Jan. 31, 2024 Draft ordinance requested from the City Attorney’s Office. Feb. 14, 2024 The Planning Commission ratifies the minutes for their meeting on January 24, 2024. Mar. 11, 2024 Draft ordinances received from the City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00959– Salt Lake City initiated this petition to amend sections of the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the proposed MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use Subdistrict 8. Specifically, amendments to chapter 21A.46 Signs, which addresses sign regulations in each zoning district. The proposed amendments are intended to establish sign regulations for the proposed MU-8 zoning district. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Brooke Olson at 801-535-7118 or via e-mail at brooke.olson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00959. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. PETITION INITATION REQUEST MEMORANDUM PLANNING DMSION DEPAR'IMENT ofCOM.MUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: LisaShaffer, auef AdministrativeOfficer; BlakeThomas, Department of Communityand NeighborhooclsDirector; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: March 1, 2023 Re: Initiate Petition toforZ011ingMapAmendments in the BallparkNeighborl10odandAssociated ZoningText Amendments This memo is to request that a petition is initiated directing the Planning Division to amend the zoning in portions of the Ballpark neighborhood in response to direction provided by the recently adopted Ballpark Station Area Plan. This plan was approved by the City Council on October 18, 2022. The Ballpark Station Area Plan provides guidance for future development and land useto support tl1e livability and futme gro,-vth in the Ballpark neighborhood. One of the keyimplementation steps identified in the plan is updating the zoning to establish a framework for future growth. The Planning Division is recommending that the zoning changes be broken into two phases: • Phase1: 2'.oning changes for the "Heart of the Neighborhood" which is focused on the vicinity of 1300 Sand West Temple St, the Jefferson Park Mixed Use area Oocated north of the ballpark to the Interstate 15 viaduct)and the Main Street conidor between Kelsey Ave and Cleveland Ave. Please refer to the attached map for the areas intended to be addressed in Phase1. • Phase 2: The remaining area along Main Street, south of Cleveland Ave. It is anticipated that Phase 2 will be started in conjunction with the adoption process for Life on State, anticipated to start later this year. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the Cityadoption process for zoning map amendments, which includes contacting recognized organizations and mailing notices to all property owners and residents in the study area in addition to general citizen input and public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. The division will also hold public engagement events in the neighborhood to provide propertyowners, residents and business owners a convenient wayto share their comments with staff. The adoption process will also include collaboration with other City Departments. The map below displays the initial proposal recommended by the Planning Division and identifies the areas that would be rezoned and the identified zoning dist1ict that most closely ali&'llS with the Ballpark Station Area Plan vision and goals. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451SOUTI-1STATE STREET,ROOM 406 PO BOX145480 SALT LAKECITY. UT84114-5480 WWW.SLC.GOV TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 BALLPARK STATION AREA - REZONE RECOMMENDATIONS N 0 90 180 360 540 -=---===Feet A In addition to the proposed zoning map amendments the working group recommended that some zoning text amendments be included as well. These amendments would help to ensure that the proposed zones meet the recommendations from the plan and may include such thing5 but not limited to greater height in the TSA areas than currently allowed and increased setbacks on heavily trafficked streets. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that isthe decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. Erin Mendenhall 03/02/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date Signature: :E:,4:::H. =l09c=59 MST) Email: erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com • Page3 Created: 2023-03-01 Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) Status: Signed Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAApOqZtc1YmfRzmqEmDSum3FE4pzwkbfGu Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2 Final Audit Report 2023-03-02 "Ballpark Rezones Petition Initiation Memo v2" History 'El Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slcgov.com) 2023-03-01 • 11:27:54 PM GMT q Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature 2023-03-01 - 11:28:57 PM GMT 'El Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) 2023-03-02 - 5:23:12 AM GMT !D'0 Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) Signature Date: 2023-03-02 • 4:59:36 PM GMT• Time Source: server t, Agreement completed. 2023-03-02 - 4:59:36 PM GMT Powt<edby Adobe Acrobat Sign • I Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council Briefing –April 2, 2024 PLNPCM2023-00336 TEXT AMENDMENT – ENFORCEMENT ON WORK WITHOUT COA Salt Lake City //Planning Division •City initiated •Addresses unlawful construction and demolition activities •Impacts properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay District citywide OVERVIEW Local Historic Districts Local Landmark Sites Salt Lake City //Planning Division The loss of a historic resource is irreversible Development pressure Zoning enforcement OBJECTIVE: •Prevent and counter violations BACKGROUND/ISSUE Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PROPOSED CHANGES 1.Adds enforcement subsection within the H Overlay 2.Limits redevelopment 3.Establishes a reconstruction process 4.Addresses violations & historic status determinations 5.Clarifies eligibility for Economic Hardship 6.Changes to related sections Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning RELATED PROPOSED CHANGES Work without COA for full or partial demolition of a contributing structure or landmark site: $250/day (new) Increase boarded building: $14,000 ($1,560) Enhanced fee for boarded contributing structures: $14,850 (new). Stop work order: $250/day (new) Increase general fines for violations to $50-$200/day Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 4. Feedback from HLC and PC 1. Enforcement Limitations KEY CONSIDERATIONS 2. Additional Tools 3. City Goals & Policies Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 1. ENFORCEMENT LIMITATIONS 1.STOP WORK ORDER 2.FINES 3.CERTIFICATE OF NONCOMPLIANCE 1.STOP WORK ORDER 2.FINES 3.CERTIFICATE OF NONCOMPLIANCE SOLUTIONCONTEXTPROBLEMTOOLS Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning •Restrict future redevelopment •Prevent greater development potential •Additional costs •Unfavorable outcome 2. ADDITIONAL TOOLS Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning •Wider Range of Preservation Tools •Enforcement of Regulation and Approvals •Ensure Preservation Regulations are Enforced •Guiding Principle: Preservation 3. CITY GOALS & POLICIES Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 4. FEEDBACK FROM HLC AND PC Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PUBLIC PROCESS Notices Briefings Hearings Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONS PC RECOMMENDATION Forward a positive recommendation to City Council HLC RECOMMENDATION Forward a positive recommendation to City Council with considerations: •Increase the 25 year to 50 years •Explore a fee charge for vacant property Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Mayara Lima // Planning Manager-Zoning Administrator mayara.lima@slcgov.com Amy Thompson // Planning Manager amy.thompson@slcgov.com ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Received: 3/28/2024 Date sent to Council: 3/28/2024 ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/21/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods __________________________ SUBJECT: Zoning text amendment related to enforcement on work done with a Certificate of Appropriateness STAFF CONTACT: Mayara Lima, Planning Manager-Zoning Administrator, Mayara.lima@slcgov.com, 801-535-6141 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the changes to the zoning ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This city-initiated petition is intended to address unlawful construction and demolition activities in the City’s local historic districts. The purpose of this amendment is to protect historic resources, which includes designated local historic districts and local landmark sites. The amendment adds enforcement tools to prevent and counter potential code violations. It establishes a clear process to remedy alterations or any demolitions that occur without approval. The proposed changes will affect Chapter 21A.34.020 (H Historic Preservation Overlay District) and related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning. Issue: A Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) is required prior to performing any exterior work on a property located within the historic overlay. The COA is the main tool the city has to ensure the work is appropriate, meets standards/design guidelines and ultimately will not damage rachel otto (Mar 28, 2024 13:52 MDT) the historic integrity of a historic resource. When work is done without such review, it puts historic resources at risk of losing their status or worse. The city’s zoning and building code enforcement is equipped to address work without permits but currently lacks the necessary tools or fines to account for the illegal demolition or permanent damage of historic resources. Unlike typical code violations that can be reversed through replacement, repair or maintenance, once all or part of a historic building is removed, its value is lost permanently. No replica can recreate the original materials, craftsmanship, and cultural value that provide authenticity and historical context to the individual resource. Because of the higher risk, enforcement of violations in the historic overlay requires a more tailored approach. Proposal: Based on research of current enforcement limitations and tools used in other cities, the proposal includes the following changes to the Zoning Ordinance: 1. Create an enforcement subsection within the historic overlay (21A.34.020): The subsection would reference the enforcement chapter in the Zoning Code (21A.20) and lists additional consequences for work conducted in violation of the historic overlay provisions. 2.Prohibit redevelopment of a property when a principal building is demolished without approval unless the proposal is for reconstruction: A contributing principal building or landmark site demolished without a COA would require reconstruction. A certificate of noncompliance would be issued and recorded against the property following the violation to prevent redevelopment for 25 years unless the applicant proposes to reconstruct the demolished structure. 3.Establish a reconstruction process: The reconstruction would have to follow specific standards to ensure the new building is true to the size, proportions, and features of the original structure. The applicant would be required to sign a legally binding restrictive covenant to acknowledge the reconstruction, prohibit future demolition and major alterations for 25 years and ensure that the terms are carried with the land. This process would be consolidated with the recently adopted standards for reconstruction of carriage houses in landmark sites. 4. Prohibit a property owner from requesting a change of status based on a violation: The city would require that any work done without a COA be undone if retroactive approval is not possible. In the case of an irreversible alteration, a request to administratively change the historic status from contributing to noncontributing based on work done without a COA would be rejected. That is, regardless of the alterations, the structure will still be reviewed as a contributing. This restriction would limit the property owner from further harmful alterations or a full demolition. A change of status would still be possible through a district survey update, subject to Council approval. 5.Clarify that self-imposed conditions are not eligible for Economic Hardship: Language added to the Economic Hardship process would disqualify requests for demolition of a contributing building based on a hardship that is related to owner’s financial ability to rehabilitate a property, lack of due diligence, or self-imposed conditions, such as demolition by neglect, intentional destabilization of the structure or enforcement of a violation. 6.Coordinate with other city code sections that relate to reconstruction and enforcement: Other sections would be amended to allow nonconforming use and noncomplying structures to be restored in case of reconstruction (21A.38) and to create a reconstruction definition (21A.62.040). PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Input: •October 3, 2023: All Salt Lake City recognized organizations were sent the required 45- day notice for the proposed text amendment. •October 10, 2023: An online open house webpage was posted to provide additional information on the petition. •October 23, 2023: The planning division sent out public outreach to stakeholders. Commission Briefing: Staff presented preliminary draft proposal to Historic Landmark and Planning Commissions to introduce the request, gather feedback, identify key issues, and answer questions. •November 2, 2023: Historic Landmark Commission •November 8, 2023: Planning Commission Their concerns were discussed in the meetings and several topics/questions were outlined and addressed in detail in Key Consideration #4 of the PC Staff Report. Public Hearings: •January 4, 2024: Historic Landmark Commission Following the public hearing, the Historic Landmark Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to City Council with the following modifications: o That the 25-year period prohibiting redevelopment and the demolition of the reconstructed structure be increased to 50 years. o That staff explore a fee, similar to the boarded building fee, for a property that is left vacant and not reconstructed. The agenda, minutes, and staff report are bookmarked below for reference. •January 10, 2024: Planning Commission Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to City Council to adopt the ordinance as proposed. The Planning Commission did not agree with the modifications recommended by the Historic Landmark Commission. The agenda, minutes, and staff report are bookmarked below for reference. Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) and Planning Commission (PC) Records a)HLC Agenda of January 4, 2024 (Click to Access) b)HLC Minutes of January 4, 2024 (Click to Access) c)HLC Staff Report of January 4, 2024 (Click to Access) d)PC Agenda of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access) e)PC Minutes of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access) f)PC Staff Report of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published 1. ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to penalties for work done without a certificate of appropriateness.) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00336 pertaining to the creation of penalties for work done without a certificate of appropriateness. WHEREAS, on January 4, 2024, the Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission (“Landmark Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the creation of penalties for work done without a certificate of appropriateness pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00336; and WHEREAS, at its January 4, 2024 meeting, the Landmark Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation with modifications to the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) and the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2024 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said petition; and WHEREAS, at its January 10, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Section 21A.34.020. That the list of subsections in Section 21A.34.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended as follows, with no other revisions to Section 21A.34.020: 21A.34.020: H HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT: A.Purpose Statement B.Applicability C.Local Historic Designation, Amendments or Revocation D.Historic Status Determination E.Certificate of Appropriateness Required F.Procedures for Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness G.Standards for Alteration of a Landmark Site, Contributing Structure or New Construction of an Accessory Structure H.Standards for New Construction or Alteration of a Noncontributing Structure I.Standards for Relocation J.Standards for Demolition of a Landmark Site K.Standards for Demolition of a Contributing Principal Building L.Economic Hardship Determination M.Reconstruction N. Enforcement SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.E.1. That Subsection 21A.34.020.E of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Certificate of Appropriateness Required) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1. A certificate of appropriateness shall be required for all of the following: a. Any exterior alteration to the property or any structure on the property unless specifically exempted under Subsection 21A.34.020.E.2; b. New construction; c. Relocation of a structure or object on the same site or to another site; d. Demolition; and e. Reconstruction 3 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.F.2. That Subsection 21A.34.020.F.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Procedure for Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 2.Historic Landmark Commission Authority: The following shall only be decided by the historic landmark commission: a.Substantial alteration or addition to a landmark site or contributing site, building, and/or structure; b. New construction of a principal building in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District; c.Relocation of a landmark site or contributing principal building; d.Demolition of a landmark site or contributing principal building; e.Economic hardship determination; f.Reconstruction; and g. Applications referred by the planning director. SECTION 4. Enacting the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.F.3.c. That a new Subsection 21A.34.020.F.3.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Procedure for Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness: Submission of Application) is hereby enacted as follows: c. Reconstruction Application Requirements: In addition to the general application requirements listed above, applications for reconstruction shall include drawings and photographs of the original structure that justify the dimensions and details of the proposed structure. The applicant shall provide documentation that indicates the original structure’s approximate: (1)Location on the site and the estimated setbacks. (2)Building footprint, including shape and size. (3)Roof shape, slope and details. (4)Building height, including wall height and roof height. (5)Openings, including location, arrangement, size and details of any window or door openings. For reconstruction of carriage house, include carriage entries. (6)Exterior building materials. SECTION 5. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.F.6. That Subsection 21A.34.020.F.6 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation 4 Overlay District: Procedure for Issuance of Certificate of Appropriateness) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 6. Administrative Decisions: The planning director or designee shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a certificate of appropriateness based upon written findings of fact. The decision of the planning director or designee shall become effective upon issuance of the certificate of appropriateness or of the findings and order in the case of an administrative denial. SECTION 6. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.L.3.c. That Subsection 21A.34.020.L.3.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Economic Hardship Determination: Procedure for Determination of Economic Hardship) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: c. Finding of Economic Hardship: If after reviewing all of the evidence presented by the applicant and the advice/testimony of the planning director’s appointed qualified expert, and if the historic landmark commission finds that the applicant has presented sufficient information supporting a determination of economic hardship, then the historic landmark commission shall approve the demolition. In order to show that all beneficial or economically viable use cannot be obtained, the historic landmark commission must find that all of the following are met: (1) The contributing principal building or landmark site cannot be economically used or rented at a reasonable rate of return in its present condition or if rehabilitated; (2) The contributing principal building or landmark site cannot be put to any reasonable beneficial use in its present condition, or if rehabilitated; (3) Bona fide efforts during the previous year to sell or lease the contributing principal building or landmark site at a reasonable price have been unsuccessful; and (4) The hardship is not a mere reduction in economic value of the property, is not caused by the owner’s financial ability to rehabilitate a property, is not caused by the owner’s lack of due diligence to rehabilitate a property, or by any other self-imposed condition, such as demolition by neglect, intentional destabilization of the structure or a violation outlined in 21A.34.020.N.3. SECTION 7. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.M. That Subsection 21A.34.020.M of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 5 M. Reconstruction: 1. Applicability: a. Reconstruction after demolition without a certificate of appropriateness: If a landmark site or contributing structure is demolished without a certificate of appropriateness, an application for reconstruction will be considered in accordance with the provisions of this Subsection. b. Reconstruction of a carriage house on a landmark site: An application for the reconstruction of a historic carriage house is allowed subject to the provision of this Subsection and if the following criteria are satisfied: (1) The carriage house is located on a landmark site. For the purpose of this section, any site that has been further subdivided since the construction of the last principal building on the site shall be considered part of the landmark site. (2) Documentation has been provided that indicates a carriage house associated with the historic period of the landmark site existed on the site. Documentation may include any property related record, prior survey, photographs, site plans, or similar records. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the necessary documentation and justification for the proposed dimensions and details of the carriage house that is proposed to be reconstructed. Documentation shall provide sufficient detail to estimate the approximate details of the carriage house. 2. Modifications authorized: The following modifications are authorized for reconstruction in accordance with this Subsection: a.Density: The qualifying provisions for density found in the minimum lot area and lot width tables of the zoning district do not apply to the proposed reconstruction, and in the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not apply. b.Multiple buildings on a single parcel: If the reconstruction results in multiple buildings on a single parcel, the buildings are allowed without each building having street frontage. 3. Compliance with additional codes: An application for reconstruction shall comply with all applicable codes, regulations and engineering standards that have been adopted by the State of Utah or the city. 4. Approval Standards: In considering an application for a certificate of appropriateness involving reconstruction, the historic landmark commission shall grant the certificate if it finds the project complies with all of the following standards: a. Reconstruction depicts only vanished or non-surviving portion of a property and includes measures to preserve any remaining historic materials, features, and spatial relationships. 6 b. The reconstruction is an accurate duplication of historic features and elements substantiated by documentary or physical evidence. When evidence is not available, conjectural designs may be allowed if supported by research of similar structures of the same era as the original structure. c. Designs that were never executed historically will not be allowed. d. The proposed structure replicates the size, shape, location, orientation, material and design of the original structure. e. The proposed structure replicates character defining features and details of the original structure. 5. Additional requirements for reconstruction of a carriage house on a landmark site: a. Subdivision Prohibited: Further subdivision of the property after approval of a reconstruction under this section is prohibited and portions of Section 21A.38.060 authorizing subdivisions of lots with more than two principal buildings shall not be applicable. b. Updated Intensive Level Survey: If reconstruction is approved, the applicant shall provide the city an updated intensive level survey to document the changes to the landmark site. c. Allowed Uses After Reconstruction: The following uses shall be allowed in a reconstructed carriage house approved under this section: (1) A single-family dwelling, regardless of lot area, lot width or street frontage; (2) Any accessory use authorized in the underlying zoning district or overlay district; or (3) Accessory dwelling units subject to the applicable regulations for accessory dwelling units. 6. Restrictive covenant for reconstruction after demolition: In the case of a reconstruction after demolition without a certificate of appropriateness, the property owner shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for the reconstruction required pursuant to 21A.34.020.N.3. The restrictive covenant shall, without limitation: a. Acknowledge the required reconstruction; b. Prohibit demolition and major alterations to the reconstructed structure for 25 years from the date of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, transferrable to any future property owner; c. Identify the nature of the approval and any conditions thereof; d. Require compliance with all applicable regulations; and e. Identify the city’s remedies for any violation of the covenant. 7. Historic status for reconstruction after demolition: Following reconstruction, the zoning administrator shall issue a historic status determination in accordance with section 21A.34.020.D, indicating the historic status of the reconstructed structure as noncontributing. Any future historic resource survey or status determination shall evaluate the reconstructed structure on its own merits. 7 SECTION 8. Enacting the text of Subsection 21A.34.020.N. That a new Subsection 21A.34.020.N of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Overlay Districts: H Historic Preservation Overlay District) is hereby enacted as follows: N. Enforcement: Any property on which work is done without a certificate of appropriateness when such is required under 21A.34.020, shall be subject to the enforcement process established in Section 21A.20. As applicable, the city shall have the following additional remedies as set forth below: 1. Any work done in violation of this chapter, and which does not comply with or cannot be made to comply with the standards of this chapter shall be undone. The structure or site shall be restored to its condition prior to such unlawful alteration to the greatest extent possible without further damage. 2.A request for historic status determination as outlined in 21A.34.020.D to change the status from contributing to noncontributing based on work done without a certificate of appropriateness shall be rejected. 3. In the case of demolition of a contributing principal structure or local landmark site without a certificate of appropriateness, a certificate of noncompliance will be issued and recorded against the property prohibiting redevelopment for 25 years unless the proposed redevelopment is for reconstruction as permitted by 21A.34.020.M. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.38.040.H.5. That Subsection 21A.38.040.H.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures: Nonconforming Uses: Modifications to Nonconforming Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 5. Deterioration or Destruction of Structure with a Nonconforming Use: Restoration of a deteriorated, damaged or destroyed structure and continuance of a nonconforming use shall be subject to the following: a. If a building or structure that contains a nonconforming use is allowed to deteriorate to a condition that the structure is rendered uninhabitable as determined by the building official and is not repaired or restored within one year after written notice to the property owner that the structure is uninhabitable, the nonconforming use will cease to be legal. b. If a building or structure that contains a nonconforming use is voluntarily razed, or is required by law to be razed, the nonconforming use shall not be resumed. 8 c. If a property owner has voluntarily demolished seventy five percent (75%) or more of the perimeter wall length and area dimensions of the exterior walls and/or total floor area of a structure, the structure shall not be restored. d. A nonconforming use may be restored when reconstruction is approved according to the provisions of 21A.34.020.M.1.a. e. If a building or structure that contains a nonconforming use is involuntarily destroyed in whole or in part due to fire or other calamity and the structure or use has not been abandoned, the nonconforming use may be resumed and the building or structure may be restored to the condition prior to the destruction, provided such work is reasonably pursued in a time frame determined by the building official after such calamity. SECTION 10. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.38.050.G. That Subsection 21A.38.040.G of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures: Noncomplying Structures) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: G. Deterioration, Damage or Destruction of Noncomplying Structure: Restoration of a deteriorated, damaged or destroyed noncomplying structure shall be subject to the following: 1. If a noncomplying structure is allowed to deteriorate to a condition that the structure is rendered uninhabitable as determined by the building official and is not repaired or restored within one year after written notice to the property owner that the structure is uninhabitable, the noncomplying structure status will be lost and requires either complete demolition or compliance with the standards of the zoning district in which the structure is located. 2. If a property owner or authorized representative voluntarily demolishes a noncomplying structure or the noncomplying structure is required by law to be razed, the structure shall not be restored unless it is restored to comply with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. Demolition of a noncomplying structure includes any act or process that destroys or removes seventy five percent (75%) or more of the perimeter wall length and area dimensions of exterior walls and/or total floor area of a structure. 3. A noncomplying structure may be restored when reconstruction is approved according to the provisions of 21A.34.020.M.1.a. 4. If a noncomplying structure is involuntarily destroyed in whole or in part due to fire or other calamity and the structure or use has not been abandoned, the structure may be restored to its original condition with respect to building footprint, setback, height and other noncomplying dimensional standards of the zoning district in which the structure is located, provided such work is started within one year, unless a longer time frame is approved by the building official, after such calamity. 9 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall be and hereby is amended to add the following definitions, which shall be inserted in alphabetical order and shall read as follows: RECONSTRUCTION (AS IT APPLIES TO PROPERTIES WITHIN THE H HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT): The act or process of depicting, by means of new construction, the form, features, and detailing of a non-surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location. SECTION 12. Adopting a “Reconstruction” fee in the Consolidated Fee Schedule. That the section of the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule titled, “Zoning Fees: Historic Landmarks Commission Review (Application)” shall be, and hereby is amended to add a new “Reconstruction” fee, which shall read as follows: Service Fee Additional Information Section Reconstruction $2,982 See also fee for required public notices (21A.10.010 E) 21A.34.020 SECTION 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER 10 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance for Work Without a COAv2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney March 19, 2024 2. CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00336 May 1, 2023 Mayor signed the petition initiation to address unlawful construction and demolition activities in the H Historic Preservation Zoning District Overlay. May 5, 2023 Petition assigned to Katia Pace, Principal Planner, for processing and research. October 3, 2023 Notice emailed to recognized organizations citywide. October 10, 2023 Proposed code changes posted to the Planning Division’s webpage as an online open house. November 1, 2023 Petition re-assigned to Mayara Lima, Planning Manager-Zoning Administrator. November 2, 2023 Briefing with the Historic Landmark Commission. November 8, 2023 Briefing with the Planning Commission. December 22, 2023 HLC public hearing notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division listserv. December 29, 2023 HLC Staff Report posted online and sent to the Historic Landmark Commission. December 29, 2023 PC public hearing notices were posted on City and State websites and at city library. January 4, 2024 PC Staff Report posted online and sent to the Planning Commission. January 4, 2024 HLC held the public hearing and forwarded a positive recommendation with modifications to City Council. January 10, 2024 PC held the public hearing and forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council. January 11, 2024 Ordinance corrections forwarded to the Attorney’s Office. March 19, 2024 Ordinance returned from the Attorney’s Office. March 19, 2024 Transmitted to CAN administration. 3. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00336 – Enforcement on work without a Certificate of Appropriateness – Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated a petition for a zoning text amendment to address unlawful construction and demolition activities in the H Historic Preservation Zoning District Overlay. The purpose of the petition is to protect historic resources, which includes designated local historic districts and local landmark sites. The text changes are aimed at adding enforcement tools to prevent and counter potential code violations and at establishing a clear process to remedy alterations or demolition that occur without approval. The proposed changes will affect Chapter 21A.34.020 and related provisions of Title 21A-Zoning. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Cassie Younger at 801-535-6211 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e- mail at mayara.lima@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00336. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 4.ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT 2 What we need in addition to this proposal are  ‐data on the outcomes of enforcement, including cases before this Commission  ‐increased benefits for owners of contributory structures through density bonuses not linked to requirements  for affordable housing  ‐implementation of transfer of development rights  ‐focus on compatible mass and scale for new construction after examining the relationship between base  zoning and overlay zoning  ‐addressing so‐called acts of God such as fires in vacant buildings  God does not burn historic buildings.     3      ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 3/4/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 3/4/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/4/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Housing Authority of Salt Lake STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson April.Patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Housing Authority of Salt Lake RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Fraser Nelson member of the Housing Authority of Salt Lake. ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 March 4, 2024 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Petro, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Housing Authority of Salt Lake. Fraser Nelson to be appointed for a four year term starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor cc: file Dear Councilman Pui, I am writing in regards to Zoning Map Amendment Request: PLNPCM2023-00096: 1463 S & 1467 S Cheyenne Street Zoning Map Amendment I have lived at for nearly 9 years. There are many things I love about my neighborhood, but what drew me here and has kept me here happily is the thriving urban agriculture community, the lovely and diverse families, and the knowledge, skill, and tool sharing that happens on a constant basis. (Fig. A) I have several specific concerns about the proposed re-zoning and development of 1463 S & 1476 S Cheyenne Street which I will outline here. Direct Negative Impact on Productive Green Space: 1463 S Cheyenne Street, as well as the two lots to the North of these properties are utilized by the small business, “B.U.G. Farms.” This year B.U.G. Farms will be growing healthy, local food for over 100 low-income households as well as to be distributed through Wasatch Community Gardens to community organizations like the Road Home, and Odyssey House. B.U.G. Farms also supports our direct neighbors by sharing produce. It is becoming increasingly difficult for farmers to produce local food in Salt Lake County, and the loss of even one established garden lot can mean the difference between a farming business thriving or failing. A garden is not just a piece of land. It takes many years and significant investments to build the soil and establish productive garden plots. In addition to the loss of soil and productive green space that this re-zoning would set in motion should it be approved, there is a possibility that these housing units would block the sun on the garden plot directly Attachment 1 - Page 1 to the North, reducing its productivity, and not only taking one established garden out of commission, but also causing harm to another. Increased Traffic Recently, Wasatch Community Gardens partnered with Utah Open Lands to acquire a large piece of property at 1425 S. Cheyenne Street. This parcel will become the new home of the Green Phoenix Farm, a program that provides jobs and job training to women who are experiencing homelessness, with an impressive success rate. We are thrilled to have this program moving into our neighborhood, however, it will undoubtedly significantly increase the traffic on our street. On a normal day, you will see kids riding their bikes up and down the street, families taking walks, farmers pushing carts, tractors doing work for the community, and plenty of happy cats. Adding 8 units to the street would increase traffic even more and decrease safety for all. Increased Development Potential The re-zoning of 1463 S & 1467 S Cheyenne Street would send a signal from the City to other developers: That there is little or no support or preservation for this incredibly unique neighborhood that demonstrates sustainability, cooperation, food-equity solutions, and quite frankly, is an oasis in one of Salt Lake City’s most glaring areas of food apartheid. Were this re- zoning approved, it would likely encourage other developers to request re-zoning of additional key areas in the neighborhood. While I understand the need for affordable housing, it should be noted that most of the farmers in the neighborhood extend the space in their homes to provide truly affordable housing beyond just the owners. In my house, for example, we house 3-4 adults who work for nonprofits, farms, are students, or work in the arts. These residents work notoriously underpaid jobs, often barely a living wage, and it is our privilege to be able to help them have a safe, comfortable, affordable place to live. There are many other farming homes in the neighborhood that utilize a similar mindset to help provide significant housing solutions. When we have only 3 adults living here full-time, we use our additional space to provide respite emergency housing and temporary housing for farmers. (See Fig. A) A better solution than high-density developments here, would be to rehabilitate and utilize 1463 S Cheyenne Street to provide truly affordable housing, keep the soil intact and productive, and let our neighborhood continue producing food and demonstrating social, environmental, and economic sustainability. Glendale Community Council Meeting On April 19, 2023, I attended the Glendale Community Council Meeting (Recorded here). At 51:45 Mr. Holland refers to the lot at 1463 S Cheyenne Street as “not really very utilized.” Which is far from true. At 55:18, Mr. Holland references including a community garden in his development plan, but there is clearly little to no space for this in the updated zoning request which now contains plans for 8 single family units (increased from 5 that he proposed on April 19, 2023). Attachment 1 - Page 2 1463 S Cheyenne Street is neither vacant, nor an underutilized space, which, as Mr. Holland points out at 53:14 out is the target of development in the Westside Master Plan. The message that I hear from City Hall, is that Salt Lake City cares about preserving productive green spaces, and is an ally to farmers and local, organic food producers. Please stand by your words, and help us protect this crucial space and this unique and thriving neighborhood. Sincerely, Sharah Yaddaw Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Attachment 1 - Page 3