04/16/2024 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
REVISED AGENDA
FORMAL MEETING
April 16, 2024 Tuesday 7:00 PM
Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at
the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings.
Council Chambers
451 South State Street, Room 315
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Victoria Petro, Chair
District 1
Chris Wharton, Vice Chair
District 3
Alejandro Puy
District 2
Eva Lopez Chavez
District 4
Darin Mano
District 5
Dan Dugan
District 6
Sarah Young
District 7
Generated: 09:37:01
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Eva Lopez Chavez will conduct the formal meeting.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 13, 2024.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Items B1-B3 will be heard as one public hearing.
1. Grant Application: Environmental Protection Agency Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant Program (CRPG) – Clean Electricity
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Sustainability to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If awarded,
the grant would fund the launch of the clean electricity “Utah Renewable
Communities” (URC) program. The funds will subsidize the URC program by covering
the first five years of estimated administration and resource costs and participant support
costs, lowering the program rate paid by participating customers. Sub-award funding will
go to Utah Community Action, Weber State University, and Moab City to assist Low-
Income and Disadvantaged Communities in accessing energy bill assistance and
navigating the URC program.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
2. Grant Application: 2024 Climate Pollution Reduction Grant - Salt Lake City
Combined Heat and Power Project
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Public Utilities to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If
awarded, the grant would fund the design and installation of a biodigester, which would
help manage waste at the City’s Water Reclamation Plant. This project will also include
the design and construction of a new combined heat and power facility including the
installation of two high-efficiency gas engine units and electrical improvements to
support the new power generation system.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
3. Grant Application: Environmental Protection Agency Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant Program (CPRG) - Fleet Electrification and Trees
The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the
Department of Public Services to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If
awarded, the grant would fund one grant and project manager position, one full-time
workforce development program manager position, and two part-time seasonal tree
stewards. Additionally, grant monies would be used to fund Fleet Electrification and
Green Workforce Development to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, support the Fleet
Division’s Accelerator Program, and support tree planting to improve the City’s existing
urban forest and forest management. This application also includes sub-awards to Utah
Neighborhood Partners (UNP) and Utah Clean Energy (UCE).
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent
agenda.
4. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendments at Approximately 2760, 2800, and
2828 North 2200 West
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the zoning of properties at approximately 2760, 2800, and 2828 North
2200 West from AG-2 (Agricultural District) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing District). The
proposal includes properties of approximately 14.33 acres. Plans for future development
were not submitted with these applications. Consideration may be given to rezoning the
properties to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within
Council District 1. Petitioner: Will Channell with OCC Industrial, who is under contract
for the properties. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and
PLNPCM2022-00701.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
5. Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at Approximately 1791
South and 1815 South State Street and 118 East and 120 East Coatsville
Avenue
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would
amend the zoning of properties at approximately 1791 and 1815 South State Street from
CC (Corridor Commercial) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use), as well as amending the
zoning of properties at approximately 118 and 120 East Coatsville Avenue from R-1/5000
(Single Family Residential) to R-MU (Residential/Mixed Use). The proposal would also
amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map. The applicant's intent of these
amendment requests is to accommodate a redevelopment proposal to be submitted at a
later date. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district
with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 5. Petitioner: Matthew
Ratelle of Colmena Group, representing the property owners. Petition No.:
PLNPCM2022-00998 & PLNPCM2022-00999.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/MavenStateRezone.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
6. Ordinance: Window Requirements for New Construction in The City’s Local
Historic Districts
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would
amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code and amend the adopted
design standards for residential and multifamily structures pertaining to the regulation
of windows in the H Historic Preservation Overlay which includes properties within local
historic districts and landmark sites. The proposed amendments add clarity to existing
processes in terms of appropriate window materials, window location, and window
installation in new construction projects. The City currently has 14 local historic districts
and approximately 150 Landmark Sites. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00444.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, March 26, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
7. Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC
The Council will accept public comment and consider approving the 2023 Citywide
Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC. It will replace the existing Transportation
Master Plan that was adopted in 1996. The Plan identifies five high-level goals, eight
long-term policies called “key moves” and over 60 implementation actions to guide
transportation decisions citywide over the coming decades.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/TransportationSLC.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
8. Ordinance: Enforcement on Work Without A Certificate of Appropriateness
Zoning Text Amendment
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would
amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code for work done without a
certificate of appropriateness. The proposal would address unlawful construction and
demolition activities in the H Historic Preservation Zoning District Overlay. The
proposed amendments are intended to protect historic resources, including designated
local historic districts and local landmark sites. The changes are aimed at adding
enforcement tools to prevent and counter potential code violations and at establishing a
clear process to remedy alterations or demolition that occur without approval. The
proposed changes will affect Chapter 21A.34.020 and related provisions of Title 21A-
Zoning. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00336.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/HistoricDistrictsSLC.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for
Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants
The Council will consider an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant
funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year
2024-25. The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding,
HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)
funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The
resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake
City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
For more information visit tinyurl.com/AnnualHUDGrants.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 and Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 5, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.3 for Fiscal Year 2023-24
The Council will consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City,
including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The Council
previously adopted all items in the budget amendment except funding to replacement
downtown parking pay stations to allow additional time to review that proposal.
For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, December 5, 2023; Tuesday, December 12, 2023; Tuesday,
January 9, 2024; Tuesday, January 16, 2024; and Tuesday, February 6, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 12, 2023 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 12, 2023; Tuesday, January 16,
2024; Tuesday, February 6, 2024; and Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to
comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person
will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1. Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations - Volunteers of
America Youth Resource Center
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance enacting a temporary zoning regulation
authorizing the Volunteers of America Youth Resource Center at approximately 888
South 400 West to increase the maximum capacity up to fifty individuals, as long as the
maximum occupancy meets building and fire code safety standards for up to 180 days.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
2. Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations - Geraldine E. King
Women’s Resource Center
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance extending a temporary zoning
regulation authorizing the Geraldine E. King Women’s Resource Center at approximately
131 East 700 South to increase the maximum capacity up to 250 individuals, as long as
the maximum occupancy meets building and fire code safety standards. The ordinance
will take effect on May 1, 2024, for up to 180 days.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
3. Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations - Gail Miller Resource
Center
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance extending a temporary zoning
regulation authorizing the Gail Miller Resource Center at 242 West Paramount Avenue to
increase the maximum capacity up to 250 individuals, as long as the maximum
occupancy meets building and fire code safety standards. The ordinance will take effect
on May 1, 2024, for up to 180 days.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
4. Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations - St. Vincent de Paul
Center
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance extending a temporary zoning
regulation authorizing the St. Vincent de Paul Center located at 437 West 200 South, to
provide overnight homeless shelter accommodations beyond April 15th, and at the
current level of occupancy, as long as the maximum occupancy meets building and fire
code safety standards,. The ordinance will take effect on May 1, 2024, for up to 180 days.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
5. Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations - MicroShelter
Community Program
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance extending a temporary zoning
regulation authorizing a temporary shelter community use at approximately 255 South
600 West Street to continue operations at the current location beginning June 1, 2024
and ending July 31, 2024.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider
motions.
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NONE.
G.CONSENT:
1. Ordinance: Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to attached structures, including garages. In 2021, Utah
State code was amended, changing standards required for these structures. The changes
to the state code imposed limitations on what municipalities can require in terms of
design elements. As a result, City code needs to be updated to match these regulations.
The Planning Division is proposing a text amendment to update standards related to
these structures, which include garages, entrance landings, and building foundations. The
amendment focuses on aligning the standards with City goals and addressing state law.
The proposed text amendments apply Citywide. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00952.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
2. Ordinance: Rezone at Approximately 536 South 200 West
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties
at approximately 536 South 200 West, 216 West Orchard Place, 224 West Orchard Place,
226 West Orchard Place, and 230 West Orchard Place from D-2 (Downtown Support
District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The proposal would align with a recently
approved D-2 to D-1 amendment for a neighboring property to the north. Future
development plans were not submitted by the applicant at this time. Consideration may
be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics.
The project is within Council District 4. Petitioner: Jason Boal, representing the property
owners. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00730.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
3. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 West 1300 South
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of City-owned property
at approximately 1050 West 1300 South from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential
District) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi-Family Residential District). The proposed
amendment would support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the
Westside Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another
zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District
2. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00609.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
4. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2023-24
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the
employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-24. The proposed amendment
includes an infrastructure loan pilot program to upgrade utilities while 2100 South is
being reconstructed between 700 East and 1300 East, a State appropriation for Avenues
City Cemetery road reconstruction and irrigation system upgrades, and additional
funding for one-time police officer new hire bonuses, among other items.
For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
5. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Metropolitan Water District Preview, Property
Tax Proposal
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider approving the proposed property tax increase by the Metropolitan Water
District of Salt Lake and Sandy, for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The Council may take action on
Tuesday, May 21, 2024.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
6. Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board – Isaac Atencio
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Isaac Atencio to the Business
Advisory Board for a term ending December 25, 2028.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
H.ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 1:00 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 2024, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder,
does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice
Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The
Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who
have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, February 13, 2024.
The following Council Members were present:
Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva
Lopez Chavez
Present Legislative leadership:
Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff
Present City Staff:
Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson –
Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent
Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Andrew Johnston – Director of
Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer
– Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Cassie
Younger – Senior Planner, Wayne Mills – Planning Manager, Angela Price – Legislative Affairs
Director, Jorge Chamorro – Public Services Director, Julie Crookston – Public Services Deputy
Director, Ben Buckley – Associate Planner, Aaron Bentley – Chief Information Officer
The meeting was called to order at: 4:15 pm.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
1
Work Session Items
1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 4:00 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects
in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and
resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts,
and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.
Andrew Johnston provided information regarding:
Homelessness Update
•Disruption to Encampment Impact Mitigation (EIM) and Rapid Intervention Team
(RIT) work last week due to inclement weather
•Folsom Trail and 1000 West along the Jordan River being a focal point for EIM and
RIT work this coming weekend
•Successful Resource Fair held last week at the Rescue Mission
•No Code-Blue were called due to the current mild weather
•State Legislative Funding Requests Impacts
◦Recap on Public Safety & Emergency Services recommendations from the
Governor’s budget to the Legislature
◦Items impacted by funding/not funding the Governor’s recommendations –
winter emergency shelter beds were generally at 99% capacity (including
winter shelter beds, medically vulnerable population (MVP), and Code Blue
beds totaling 825 beds)
◦At minimum, 625 of these beds could be eliminated in the summertime and
going forward without additional funding
◦Deeply affordable housing requests
◾40K of Utah renters were extremely low income renters (30% AMI or
below)
◾Homelessness could not be solved without housing and services
•Funding was needed to continue winter emergency shelter beds
2.Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 803, 805,
807, and 815 West Simondi Avenue and 802, 806, 810, and
814 West 300 North
~ 4:20 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of
properties located at approximately 803, 805, 807, and 815 West Simondi Avenue
and 802, 806, 810, and 814 West 300 North from R1/7000 (Single-Family Residential)
to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family). The proposal would also amend the Northwest
Community Master Plan Future Land Use Map. The proposal would allow greater
flexibility in housing types to develop these properties. Consideration may be given to
rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project
is within Council District 2. Petitioner: NeighborWorks.
For more information visit http://tinyurl.com/SimondiAve300NorthRezone.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
2
Brian Fullmer provided an introduction to the proposal.
Cassie Younger and Wayne Mills provided information regarding:
•Vicinity map including subject properties, current/proposed zoning, and project
description
•Existing condition; all properties were currently vacant with an alley that runs
through the center
•The applicant was proposing to amend the Future Land Use Map be updated to
Medium Density Residential
•Housing typologies between the the zones (R-1-7000 and RMF-30)
•Comparison of development standards for R-1-7000 and RMF-30
•Planning Commission having forwarded a positive recommendation for the zoning
map and Master Plan amendment
•Affordable housing considerations for new development on the properties
David Foster (Applicant, NeighborWorks) and Maria Garciaz (NeighborWorks)
provided information regarding:
•Examples of buildings that previously occupied the properties (fourplex, former
gas station, garages, etc.)
•Examples of past townhomes built by NeighborWorks
•Examples of the proposed ideas for the vacant property
•Seeking a deal with Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency for a community land
trust to bring the units in under $400,000
•Plans to maintain the alley and to activate street level with front porches
3.Ordinance: Zoning Terms and Definitions Amendment ~ 4:40 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of
Title 21A of Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the zoning ordinance. The proposal would
remove Chapter 21A.60 List of Terms and would also amend Chapter 21A.62 Definitions.
Other amendments are made throughout Title 21A for clarity and consistency. No zoning
standards or land use regulations are changed by this text amendment.
Ben Buckley provided information regarding:
•Details of the project request; removal of Chapter 21A.60 List of Terms,
amendments to 21A.62.040 and to related provisions throughout Title 21A
•No zoning standards or land use regulations were being impacted by this
amendment
•Planning Commission having forwarded a positive recommendation
•Proposed changes include definitions being amended or clarified as well as where
building heights were measured from
4.Informational: State Legislative Briefing ~ 5:00 p.m.
30 min.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
3
The Council will receive a briefing about issues affecting the City that may arise during
the 2024 Utah State Legislative Session.
Angela Price provided information regarding:
•The Legislative Affairs team was tracking 253 bills and working on over 50 bills
currently
•Ranked Choice Voting Bill – The City being in opposition to the bill, as it would roll
back the pilot program for ranked choice voting, cutting the pilot program in May
2024
•Homeless and Housing Appropriations Bills
◦House Bill (HB) 42 – Homelessness Amendments, having passed out of
committee last week, the City had ongoing concerns with this bill and was
currently working with the sponsor through Utah League of Cities and
Towns (ULCT)
◦HB 298 – passed by the House and waiting for the Senate, Homelessness
Appropriations would potentially be tied to this bill, hence the reason for its
status
•Land Use Bills
◦HB 476 – Municipal Land Use Regulations – heard this morning in
committee
◦HB 465 – Housing Affordability Revisions – having passed out of committee
this morning
•The Council having issued a statement regarding the State Board of Education and
the Legislative team was watching this closely to see if the Legislature would take
action
•Various/multiple social bills that could impact how the City operated and how
employees were cared for both religious freedoms and utilization of gender specific
language – all being watched closely, working on amendments, and building
coalitions/partnerships regarding these bills
5.Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA)
Training ~ 5:30 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing from the Recorder's Office about the Government
Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA). This briefing will serve as the annual
training for both the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency and the City
Council.
Cindy Lou Trishman provided information regarding:
GRAMA, Records Retention, 2023 Statistics
•GRAMA having been enacted into law in 1991 under Title 63G, Chapter 2 with a
balanced effort to support:
◦Right to access by the public
◦Guidelines for necessary restrictions
◦Prevention of abuse of confidentiality in government
•Retention schedules
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
4
◦Records having retention periods defined by time and value
◦Records being retained according to the periods identified by the City
Recorder’s Office in coordination with department records managers
◦Governing retention included identification and destruction processes (paper
and digital) for records and data
•Records include anything that was received, prepared, owned, or retained such as
books, letters, recordings, electronic data, maps, etc.
•There are some material not defined as records under GRAMA based on the
requirement to respond to the request, but these records are still evaluated for
value and its duration of life cycle
•GRAMA Specifics
◦10 business days to respond (not counting day of receipt, holidays, or
weekends)
◦Five business days to respond to expedited requests
◦Extensions could be requested
◦Fee waivers were evaluated in conjunction with the Recorder’s Office and the
department providing responsive records
•Denials & Appeals
◦Issued for a variety of reasons (based on classification of records, including
private, controlled, or confidential records)
◦Requester has 30 calendar days to appeal a decision
◦City having 10 business days to respond to an appeal
◦Requester may appeal City’s decision to the State Records Committee or
District Court
•Statistics and Additional Information
◦15,620 GRAMA requests received in 2023 (a 5% decrease from the previous
year)
◦Police records being the highest area of GRAMA requests
◦30 appeals requested in 2023
◦Five GRAMA requests went to the State Records Committee (SRC) of which
three were mediated/withdrawn, and two were heard by the SRC, but upheld
that the City had the correct classification and record decision
6.Dinner Break ~ 5:50 p.m.
30 min.
7.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 ~ 6:20 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about Budget Amendment No.4 for the Fiscal Year
2023-24 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect
adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and
modifications. The proposed amendment includes over $1.8 million for police officer
overtime related to the Clean Neighborhoods Program, three new full-time mechanics in
the Fleet Division, $230,000 to expand a City air quality incentives program, and a new
software tool to identify non-compliant short-term rentals among other items.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
5
For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.
Ben Luedtke and Mary Beth Thompson provided information regarding the Budget
Amendment, and Council Members discussed the following items:
•Item A-1 – $230K Air Quality Incentives Program Expansion for Electric Bikes
and Indoor Air Purification (from nondepartmental holding account and satisfying
condition on the funds)
◦Council Member Puy said although he wanted access to e-bikes for the
public, there were other crises facing the City, and he struggled with this item
as a budget amendment
◦Council Member Petro said she was interested in meeting (with the
Administration) to discuss the structural necessity for maintaining e-bikes
for emerging Americans and people who would potentially become part of
the bike culture, particularly in her district
◦Straw Poll: Support to approve funding Item A-1 for this fiscal year
only and the intention is to signal to the administration, that this would not
be an ongoing function and specifically the Council was interested in
potentially making changes to the 50/50 breakdown (income qualified vs.
not income qualified.) All Council Members were in favor.
•Item A-9 – $194K Mobile Phone Data Extraction Software (IMS Fund Balance)
◦Straw Poll: Support to approve Item A-9. All Council Members were in
favor.
•Item A-10 – $203,148 Versaterm Case Service Software Upgrade (IMS Fund
Balance)
◦Aaron Bentley explained that this software would be used for public safety
cases only and would allow for access up to 30 different languages for verbal
communication and up to 60 languages for texting and the form, confirmed
this would consolidate services and existing mobile apps would expire at the
end of this year
◦Straw Poll: Support to approve Item A-10. All Council Members were in
favor.
•Item A-7 – $400K Increase in Fleet Maintenance Capacity (General Fund)
◦Jorge Chamorro and Julie Crookston explained the correlation of
billable and maintenance hours that determined the need for additional
staff needed for the increased work, confirmed that the current Fleet building
had capacity to take on the additional requested employees with one
projected to be a mobile mechanic
◦Council Member Puy offered his support for this item but wanted to discuss
for the future, if it would benefit the City to lease vehicles vs. purchasing
retired fleets from other agencies
◦Straw Poll: Support to approve Item A-7. All Council Members were in
favor.
8.Informational: SLC Emergency Management Update 2024 ~ 6:50 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
6
90 min.
The Council will receive an annual report of the City’s emergency procedures, the
Council’s role in an emergency, and an overview of Emergency Management’s current
programs and efforts.
Item not held.
Standing Items
9.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
Item not held.
10.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -
-
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and
announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.
Item not held.
11.Tentative Closed Session -
-
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health
of an individual;
b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i) public discussion of the transaction would:
(A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
7
(ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and
(iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements
of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to
enter into Closed Session for the purposes of discussion regarding the
deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems and advice of
counsel.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
Closed Session started at 6:10 pm, ending at 6:40 pm. Minutes and Recording not
created pursuant to UCA 52-4-206(6)(b).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Council Member
Dugan to exit Closed Session.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
8
Meeting adjourned at: 6:40 pm.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair – Victoria Petro
_______________________________
City Recorder – Cindy Trishman
Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council
Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments
submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may
not remain active indefinitely.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City
Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, February 13, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a
full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code
§52-4-203.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
9
Item B1 – B3
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
________________________________________________________________________________
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Review of 3 EPA Environmental Grant Applications
4/16/24
Council Members,
Ben has provided the following introduction: As the Council may recall, the grants listed below were expected as the implementation steps from
the Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) that the Dept. of Sustainability developed. The grants were mentioned during the February 20th briefing
and then Council Members were able to discuss the individual applications in small group meetings last month. The three applications are
competing for the same grant funding from the EPA so being awarded more than one is unlikely.
All three grants are eligible because the Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) included the activities as potential greenhouse gas emissions reduction
measures. Sustainability coordinated with Public Utilities, Fleet, and Urban Forestry on the PCAP development and their applications. Sustainability
couldn’t be the applicant for all of them because of EPA rules limiting how many applications each entity may submit.
There are five different funding level tiers for these one-time, nationally competitive EPA grants. The competition is within the tiers as much as
across all applications. The below chart is from an EPA presentation about the grant program. So the Public Services application is Tier E, and the
Sustainability application and the Public Utilities application are both in Tier D.
City Match
Required?
Number of
FTEs
Requested
Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual
Grant
Total
Grant &
and FTE
Amount
Funding
Agency
Requested
By
1.EPA Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant
Program (CRPG) –
Clean Electricity
Launch clean electricity
Utah Renewable
Communities program.
Subsidize URC program
by covering the first 5
years of estimated
administration and
resource costs and
participant support
costs. Sub-award will go
to Utah Community
Action, Weber State
University, and Moab
City to assist Low-
Income and
Disadvantaged
Communities.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $49,633,447
Tier D in the
above chart
EPA Sustainability
`
2.No.None.2024 Climate
Pollution Reduction
Grant - Salt Lake City
Combined Heat and
Power Project
Design and install a
biodigester which would
help manage waste at
the City’s Water
Reclamation Plant. Also
includes the design and
construction of a new
combined heat and
power facility including
installation of two high
efficiency gas engine
units and electrical
improvements to
support the new power
generation system.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $22,500,000
Tier D in the
above chart
EPA Public
Utilities
3.No.Four: 1
Grant
Project
Mgr., 1
Workforce
Developmt.
Program
Mgr., 2
seasonal
tree
stewards
EPA Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant
Program (CPRG) Fleet
Electrification and
Trees
Fund 4 positions. Fund
Fleet Electrification and
Green Workforce
Development to reduce
greenhouse emissions,
support the Fleet
Division’s Accelerator
Program, & support tree
planting to improve the
City’s existing urban
forest. Also includes sub-
awards to Utah
Neighborhood Partners
and Utah Clean Energy.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $9,835,723
Tier E in the
above chart
EPA Public
Services
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Amy Dorsey
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
EC: Department of Sustainability Sophia Nicholas, Christopher Thomas
FROM: Adrienne Buhler
DATE: April 2, 2024
SUBJECT: EPA CPRG Grant Submission Notification
FUNDING AGENCIES: EPA
GRANT PROGRAM: Climate Pollution Reduction Grant Program
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $49,633,447.
DEPARTMENT: Sustainability
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Rocky Mountain Power, Utah Community Action, Weber State University, Moab City
DATE SUBMITTED: 3/29/2024
SPECIFICS:
☐Equipment/Supplies Only
☐Technical Assistance
☐Provides Hourly Positions
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
☐Match Required None In-Kind Services and ☐ Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
A grant to launch a community choice clean electricity program called the Utah Renewable Communities (URC)
program. The grant award will go toward funding to subsidize the URC program by covering the first five years of
estimated administration and resource costs as participant support costs, thereby lowering the program rate paid by
participating customers. Funding as sub-awards will also go to Utah Community Action, Weber State University, and
Moab City to employ URC Navigators to assist Low-Income and Disadvantaged Communities in accessing energy bill
assistance and navigating the URC program.
Item B1 – B3
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
________________________________________________________________________________
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Review of 3 EPA Environmental Grant Applications
4/16/24
Council Members,
Ben has provided the following introduction: As the Council may recall, the grants listed below were expected as the implementation steps from
the Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) that the Dept. of Sustainability developed. The grants were mentioned during the February 20th briefing
and then Council Members were able to discuss the individual applications in small group meetings last month. The three applications are
competing for the same grant funding from the EPA so being awarded more than one is unlikely.
All three grants are eligible because the Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) included the activities as potential greenhouse gas emissions reduction
measures. Sustainability coordinated with Public Utilities, Fleet, and Urban Forestry on the PCAP development and their applications. Sustainability
couldn’t be the applicant for all of them because of EPA rules limiting how many applications each entity may submit.
There are five different funding level tiers for these one-time, nationally competitive EPA grants. The competition is within the tiers as much as
across all applications. The below chart is from an EPA presentation about the grant program. So the Public Services application is Tier E, and the
Sustainability application and the Public Utilities application are both in Tier D.
City Match
Required?
Number of
FTEs
Requested
Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual
Grant
Total
Grant &
and FTE
Amount
Funding
Agency
Requested
By
1.EPA Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant
Program (CRPG) –
Clean Electricity
Launch clean electricity
Utah Renewable
Communities program.
Subsidize URC program
by covering the first 5
years of estimated
administration and
resource costs and
participant support
costs. Sub-award will go
to Utah Community
Action, Weber State
University, and Moab
City to assist Low-
Income and
Disadvantaged
Communities.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $49,633,447
Tier D in the
above chart
EPA Sustainability
`
2.No.None.2024 Climate
Pollution Reduction
Grant - Salt Lake City
Combined Heat and
Power Project
Design and install a
biodigester which would
help manage waste at
the City’s Water
Reclamation Plant. Also
includes the design and
construction of a new
combined heat and
power facility including
installation of two high
efficiency gas engine
units and electrical
improvements to
support the new power
generation system.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $22,500,000
Tier D in the
above chart
EPA Public
Utilities
3.No.Four: 1
Grant
Project
Mgr., 1
Workforce
Developmt.
Program
Mgr., 2
seasonal
tree
stewards
EPA Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant
Program (CPRG) Fleet
Electrification and
Trees
Fund 4 positions. Fund
Fleet Electrification and
Green Workforce
Development to reduce
greenhouse emissions,
support the Fleet
Division’s Accelerator
Program, & support tree
planting to improve the
City’s existing urban
forest. Also includes sub-
awards to Utah
Neighborhood Partners
and Utah Clean Energy.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $9,835,723
Tier E in the
above chart
EPA Public
Services
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards , Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Jill Love
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Sarah Behrens, Adrienne Buhler, Amy
Dorsey
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
FROM: Sarah Behrens
DATE: April 8, 2024
SUBJECT: Salt Lake City Combined Heat and Power project
FUNDING AGENCIES: Environmental Protection Agency
GRANT PROGRAM: 2024 Climate Pollution Reduction Grant – Implementation Grant
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $22,500,000
DEPARTMENT: Public Utilities
COLLABORATING AGENCIES:
DATE SUBMITTED: March 28, 2024
SPECIFICS:
Equipment/Supplies Only
Technical Assistance
Provides Hourly Positions
Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation:
Match Required In-Kind Services and Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
Public Utilities has requested funds to design and install a biodigester as part of the SLC Water Reclamation Plant. A combined
heat and power system, cogeneration, is an efficient, clean, and reliable method of converting biogas (a byproduct of the
anaerobic digestion process) to electrical power and thermal energy needed for the treatment process.
Salt Lake City Combined Heat and Power project will encompass the design and construction of a new combined heat and
power facility which includes the procurement and installation of two high efficiency gas engine units, electrical
improvements to support the new power generation system, and connecting the electrical power produced into the new 13.8
kV plant electrical distribution system being constructed as part of the Salt Lake City Water Reclamation Facility Nutrient
Project.
No. Scope of Work Capital Cost
1. Engineering Pre -Design $429,663
2. Engineering Detailed Design and Construction services $2,792,807
3. Permitting $358,052
4. Contract
Contractor's General Conditions & administrative cost for construction $1,183,896
Contractor's Mob, Bond, Insurance and Profit $1,469,610
5. Market Adjustment Factor (10%) $1,627,510
6. CHP Construction (Direct Costs)
New Engine 1 $1,220,000
Heat Exchanger 1 $60,000
New Engine 2 $1,220,000
Heat Exchanger 2 $60,000
Electrical and Controls $4,748,000
7. Additional Infrastructure Construction Costs -
Supporting Infrastructure - Sitework, Yard Piping, Yard Electrical, etc. $2,557,800
8. Contingency (30%) $3,755,792
9. Total Capital Cost - 2023 Dollars (rounded) $21,500,000
10. Total Capital Cost - 2024 Dollars (rounded) $22,500,000
Item B1 – B3
Page 1
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING
________________________________________________________________________________
The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion:
Motion 1 – Close and Refer
I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-3 to a
future Consent Agenda for action.
Project Timeline:
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Review of 3 EPA Environmental Grant Applications
4/16/24
Council Members,
Ben has provided the following introduction: As the Council may recall, the grants listed below were expected as the implementation steps from
the Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) that the Dept. of Sustainability developed. The grants were mentioned during the February 20th briefing
and then Council Members were able to discuss the individual applications in small group meetings last month. The three applications are
competing for the same grant funding from the EPA so being awarded more than one is unlikely.
All three grants are eligible because the Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) included the activities as potential greenhouse gas emissions reduction
measures. Sustainability coordinated with Public Utilities, Fleet, and Urban Forestry on the PCAP development and their applications. Sustainability
couldn’t be the applicant for all of them because of EPA rules limiting how many applications each entity may submit.
There are five different funding level tiers for these one-time, nationally competitive EPA grants. The competition is within the tiers as much as
across all applications. The below chart is from an EPA presentation about the grant program. So the Public Services application is Tier E, and the
Sustainability application and the Public Utilities application are both in Tier D.
City Match
Required?
Number of
FTEs
Requested
Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual
Grant
Total
Grant &
and FTE
Amount
Funding
Agency
Requested
By
1.EPA Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant
Program (CRPG) –
Clean Electricity
Launch clean electricity
Utah Renewable
Communities program.
Subsidize URC program
by covering the first 5
years of estimated
administration and
resource costs and
participant support
costs. Sub-award will go
to Utah Community
Action, Weber State
University, and Moab
City to assist Low-
Income and
Disadvantaged
Communities.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $49,633,447
Tier D in the
above chart
EPA Sustainability
`
2.No.None.2024 Climate
Pollution Reduction
Grant - Salt Lake City
Combined Heat and
Power Project
Design and install a
biodigester which would
help manage waste at
the City’s Water
Reclamation Plant. Also
includes the design and
construction of a new
combined heat and
power facility including
installation of two high
efficiency gas engine
units and electrical
improvements to
support the new power
generation system.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $22,500,000
Tier D in the
above chart
EPA Public
Utilities
3.No.Four: 1
Grant
Project
Mgr., 1
Workforce
Developmt.
Program
Mgr., 2
seasonal
tree
stewards
EPA Climate Pollution
Reduction Grant
Program (CPRG) Fleet
Electrification and
Trees
Fund 4 positions. Fund
Fleet Electrification and
Green Workforce
Development to reduce
greenhouse emissions,
support the Fleet
Division’s Accelerator
Program, & support tree
planting to improve the
City’s existing urban
forest. Also includes sub-
awards to Utah
Neighborhood Partners
and Utah Clean Energy.
Needs
Public
Hearing
No $9,835,723
Tier E in the
above chart
EPA Public
Services
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Office of the City Council | Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Taylor Hill, Sylvia Richards, Linda Sanchez,
Lehua Weaver
Office of the Mayor | Rachel Otto, Jill Love
Department of Finance | Mary Beth Thompson, Aaron Price, Amy Dorsey
Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com
EC: Public Services Department| Jorge Chamorro, Julie Crookston
Department of Sustainability Sophia Nicholas, Debbie Lyons
Urban Forestry Tony Gliot
FROM: Adrienne Buhler
DATE: April 2, 2024
SUBJECT: EPA CPRG Fleet Electrification and Trees Grant Submission Notification
FUNDING AGENCIES: EPA
GRANT PROGRAM: Climate Pollution Reduction Grant Program
REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $ 9,835,723.00
DEPARTMENT: Public Services
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: SLC Urban Forestry, SLC Sustainability, University Neighborhood Partners (UNP), Utah Clean Energy
(UCE)
DATE SUBMITTED: 3/29/2024
SPECIFICS:
☐Equipment/Supplies Only
☐Technical Assistance
☒Provides 2 FT and 2 PT seasonal positions.
☐Existing ☒New ☐Overtime ☐Requires Funding After Grant
Explanation: 1 FT Grant and Project Manager; 1 FT Workforce Development Program Manager; 2
PT seasonal tree stewards.
☐Match Required None In-Kind Services and ☐ Cash
GRANT DETAILS:
This application contains two GHG reduction measures from SLC’s PCAP:
Measure 1: Fleet Electrification and Green Workforce Development will significantly reduce GHG emissions by 2030
and beyond, while also providing substantial community benefits, particularly in LIDACs. Measure 1 contains three
subtasks Task 1.1 SLC Municipal Charging Infrastructure Installations, Task 1.2 Workforce Development Program, and
Task 1.3 Government Fleets Accelerator Program.
Measure 2: Equity-Focused Tree planting will enhance urban afforestation, improve forest management of the existing
urban forest, reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and beyond, and provide substantial community benefits,
particularly in LIDACs.
This application also includes sub-awards to UNP and UCE.
Item B4
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: MOTION SHEET – Zoning Map Amendment: AG-2 to M-1
2760 N, 2800 N and 2828 N 2200 W
PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and
PLNPCM2022-00701
MOTION 1
I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
MOTION 2
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting.
MOTION 3
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance contingent on the developer and
administration finalizing the development agreement pursuant to the terms outlined in the draft development
agreement, Attachment A.
COUNCIL STAFF
REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE:Zoning Map Amendment: AG-2 to M-1
2760 North, 2800 North and 2828 North 2200
WestPLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700
and PLNPCM2022-00701
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: March 19, 2024
Set Date: March 26, 2024
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Potential Action: May 7, 2024
NEW INFORMATION
During the March 19 work session briefing the council discussed the proposed zoning amendment with
Planning staff and the applicant. The Council gave staff the following direction for the draft development
agreement.
1. Add language to clarify package delivery is allowed secondary to the primary use.
2. Prefer to keep the proposed number of trees as proposed in the first draft, require as screening
adjacent to residential, allow clustering in other areas.
3. Keep requirement to complete subdivision process.
Based on that direction the Administration updated the draft development agreement (see Attachment A).
The applicant has reviewed the draft and is supportive of it.
The key obligations of the developer that were discussed by the Council are outlined below. Please see
pages 2-4 of Attachment A to see the full list of conditions.
1. Structures on the Westerly Parcels shall be limited to a 33% building coverage ratio and no
structure on the Property shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from finished floor elevation to
the top of the building (the height exception of 5’ for parapet
Page | 2
The Property shall not be used primarily as a “Package Delivery Facility”
o package delivery facility is defined as: a facility for the receipt, transfer, short
term storage, and dispatching of goods and packages.
2. Install landscaping in accordance with the city’s landscaping and Northwest Quadrant overlay
district landscaping ordinances.
Lots abutting a residential use (as depicted in the development agreement exhibit) will have
a 15’ vegetative buffer.
Vegetative buffer will include a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees with at least one
planted every 30 ft.
Property lines directly abutting residential use will have 1 tree for every 15 linear feet and 1
shrub every 3 feet, with mature height of no less than 4 feet.
3. A condition of any future building permit for the Property shall limit construction activity to
between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Friday and 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Saturday
4. Property Developer shall apply for a preliminary subdivision plat and comply with all applicable
subdivision standards.
The following information was provided for the March 19 briefing. It is provided again for
background purposes.
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will be briefed on a proposal that would rezone three parcels located at 2760 North, 2800
North and 2828 North 2200 West from AG-2 to M-1.
In January 2023 this petition was tabled by the Planning Commission until the Northpoint Small Area plan
was finalized by the City Council. The Northpoint Plan was approved by the Council on November 14,
2023. This petition was heard by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2023, and received a positive
recommendation.
The Northpoint Small Area plan included policy direction pertaining to zoning changes that are considered
before a new zoning district is approved, that would help implement the polices and goals of the small area
plan. That guidance states the following:
“…any proposed zoning map amendment in the Transitional area will also be subject to a
development agreement aimed at realizing the plan’s vision and design standards, until the area’s
zoning regulations are adopted.” (Page 14, Northpoint Small Area Plan)
With that direction in mind, the applicant and Planning staff have been working on a development
agreement that would be adopted as part of the zoning amendment. (See Attachment A) The agreement is
not yet finalized, but the concepts outlined on page 2 of the transmittal letter are being considered as part
of the discussion. See Policy Questions section below (page 3) for Development Agreement Discussion.
Vicinity Map
From Transmittal Letter, Page 1
Red square shows where this rezone fits the larger area of the city
Page | 3
POLICY QUESTIONS
Page | 4
1. The applicant, City Planning, Attorneys office, and Council staff have been discussing concepts that
would be included in the development agreement to ensure the vision and policies of the
Northpoint Small Area Plan are implemented.
Does the Council support the concepts outlined below being included in a potential development
agreement between the developer and the City?
Not allow package and delivery services
Maximum of 33% building coverage of the property
Maximum 40 ft height (city ordinance allows an additional 5’ to include a parapet to
help mask mechanical equipment on the roof)
Landscaping buffer adjacent to residential shall include a mix of evergreen and deciduous
trees, with at least one tree planted every 30 feet as shown
Infrastructure to accommodate a minimum of 5% EV Capable parking will be provided
Buildings will be designed and constructed to be solar ready.
2. A significant point of discussion during the adoption of the small area plan was a prohibition on
warehouse distribution uses. With that in mind the draft development agreement includes
language that would prohibit package delivery uses. However, the developer has noted delivery and
packaging uses will likely be needed as a part of the overall business operations by potential tenants
who manufacture or build a product on site that would then need to be shipped from their location.
Does the Council support allowing delivery services as a secondary use to business in the
development agreement?
3. The City has received many reports of community concerns about impacts from the development
going on in the area. The Council may wish to consider how the development agreement could be
used to help mitigate impacts that result from construction, such as limiting times when
construction may occur, address potential street closures, traffic safety, and work in the public right
of way, etc.
The Applicant has included in the draft development agreement conditions that would:
a. Limit construction operations between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Friday and
9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Saturday.
b. Provide a phone number and email address for a contact person for neighbors to reach out
to if there are any construction related concerns/comments.
PUBLIC PROCESS
January 11, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting
o Early Notification was sent August 5, 2022
Page | 5
o Notification of the proposal was sent to the Westpointe Community Council on
August 5, 2022.
o The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 7-1 to table the petitions until the
North Point Small Area Plan was approved and adopted by the City Council.
December 13, 2023, Planning Commission Meeting
o Early notification was sent November 29, 2023
o December 8, 2023, Public hearing notice mailed.
o The Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted 6-1 (with one abstention) to send
a favorable recommendation for the petitions to the City Council.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
1. Adjacent land use and zoning
o This area of the city is a mixture of single family residential, agriculture, natural habitat and
much of it is transitioning to light industrial uses such as warehouses, industrial assembly
land offices.
2. Northpoint Small Area Plan
o In recent years this area has experienced substantial growth that has led to some conflict
between industrial development adjacent to agriculture and residential uses, and
developments adjacent to or abutting critical habitat areas (i.e. wetlands and upland).
o Industrial development has begun, and is expected to continue, to develop in this area of
Salt Lake City. The Northpoint vision is to balance the anticipated growth of light industrial
and manufacturing uses with the existing and continued residential and agricultural uses of
the area.
o The Northpoint Small Area Plan includes a variety of policies meant to help mitigate the
effects of high-impact development on the residential, agricultural uses as well as the
natural environment. Some of these methods include:
• Appropriate buffering, building design, and development characteristics to reduce
the impacts on residential and agricultural uses, important wildlife habitats, and
other uses within the area.
• Design standards to reduce the negative impacts that future land uses may have
on air quality, water quality, noise, and light.
• Recommends a Northpoint-specific development code that codifies the
recommended design standards and includes incentive-based tools for open space
preservation.
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
Salt Lake City Corporation
Attn: Planning Director
451 S. State Street, Suite 406
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Tax Parce Nos. 08-09-476-028-0000;
08-10-300-012-0000; 08-09-476-026-0000
DEVELOPMENT AND USE AGREEMENT
THIS DEVELOPMENT AND USE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and
entered into by and between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a political subdivision of
the State of Utah (“City”) and ________________________ (“Developer”). City and Developer
may be referred to herein collectively as “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. Developer is the owner of approximately 12.174 acres of land located at 2722 North
2200 West Street and 2828 North 2200 West Street in Salt Lake City (the “Property”), which land
is more particularly described on the attached Exhibit “A”. The Property is compromised of three
(3) tax parcels, Parcels 08-09-476-026-0000 and 08-09-476-028-0000 (“Westerly Parcels”) and
Parcel 08-10-300-012-0000 (“Easterly Parcel”).
B. Developer submitted petitions to amend the zoning map with respect to the
Property to change the zoning from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing
District (Petition Nos. PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700, and PLNPCM2022-00701).
C. The Salt Lake City Planning Commission made a positive recommendation to the
Salt Lake City Council on Developers’ petitions at its December 13, 2023 meeting.
D. On Month XX, XXX the city council voted to approve Developer’s petitions
subject to Developer entering into a development agreement requiring Developer to design its
development project to be compliant with the design standards established in the Northpoint Small
Area Plan.
E. City, acting pursuant to its authority under the Municipal Land Use,
Development, and Management Act, Utah Code §§ 10-9a-101, et seq., as amended, and in
furtherance of its land use policies, goals, objectives, ordinances, and regulations of Salt Lake
2
City, in the exercise of its legislative discretion, has elected to approve and enter into this
Agreement.
For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, and in reliance on the foregoing recitals, City and Developer agree as follows:
1. Incorporations of Recitals. The Parties hereby incorporate the foregoing recitals
into this Agreement.
2. Obligations of the Parties.
a. Developer hereby agrees that the Property shall be bound to provide an
environment for light industrial uses that produce no appreciable impact on
adjacent properties, that desire a clean attractive industrial setting, and that
protects nearby sensitive lands and waterways. To that end, the Property shall not
be used for “Package Delivery Facility” as defined in Title 21A of the Salt Lake
City Code as a principal use. The Property may seek approval for all other
permitted or conditional uses in the underlying zoning district and conduct
accessory uses thereto in accordance with such approval(s). Further, structures on
the Westerly Parcels shall be limited to a 33% building coverage ratio and no
structure on the Property shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from finished
floor elevation to the top of the building (the height exception of 5’ for parapet
would apply if needed per 21A.36.020.C).
b. The Property shall be subject to a 75-foot setback from the Reclamation
Canal.
c. The Property shall be subject to a 65-foot setback from existing residential
dwellings.
d. Developer hereby agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the
requirements set forth in Chapter 21A.48 of the Salt Lake City Code as well as the
Northwest Quadrant Overlay District landscaping requirements set forth in
Subsection 21A.34.140.B.2 thereof. All lots abutting a residential use shall
provide a 15’ planted vegetative buffer within the required interior side or rear
landscape yard (except for the emergency only access drive as shown on Exhibit
B). At a minimum, such vegetative buffer shall include a mix of evergreen and
deciduous trees, with at least one tree planted every 30 feet as shown in red on
Exhibit B. The property lines directly abutting the residential use, as shown in
green on Exhibit B, shall provide 1 tree for every 15 linear feet and 1 shrub every
3 feet, with a mature height of no less than 4’, shall be required along the length
of the landscape buffer. All landscaping on the Property shall consist of native
and drought-tolerant plants found in the “Salt Lake City Northwest Quadrant
Plant List”. Grass turf is prohibited.
3
e. To mitigate the contrast of the built and natural environment, Developer
agrees to utilize the following building materials on principal structures on the
Property: brick, natural stone, wood, tinted/textured concrete. Exterior plastic
vinyl siding or any reflective or shiny polished materials shall not be used. Light
reflective roofing material with a minimum solar reflective index (SRI) of 82 shall
be used for all roofs.
f. Developer hereby agrees to install and maintain lighting fixtures on the
Property that are International DarkSky Association-approved fixtures and are
compliant with Northwest Quadrant Overlay District requirements.
g. Developer shall utilize detention or retention ponds that meet requirements
established by the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities.
h. Mirrored or highly reflective glass shall not be installed on structures on
the Property to support bird-friendly design in accordance with Subsection
21A.34.140.C.1.a of the Salt Lake City Code.
i. Structures on the Property that face 2200 West Street shall not exceed a
maximum continuous building frontage of 250 feet .
j. Developer hereby agrees that decorative fencing features installed on the
Property that could be hazardous to wildlife shall be prohibited including: (a)
pointed or narrow extensions as the top of fences, (b) wires that may entangle
animals , and (c) hollow fence posts that are open at the top when birds or other
small animals may become entrapped in open cavity. The fencing material may
not be more than 49% opaque.
k. Developer hereby agrees that excavation methods shall be consistent with
Salt Lake City requirements.
l. Developer hereby agrees that access to loading docks and truck turnaround
areas on the Property shall be provided to the side or rear of buildings and shall
not be in any required buffer areas.
m. Developer will work in good faith with future occupants to encourage and
support occupants that engage in sustainable processes and produce minimal
emissions.
n. Developer will include a food truck pad in the side or rear yard of the
Westerly Parcels.
o. A condition of any future building permit for the Property shall limit
construction activity to between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM Monday through Friday
and 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM on Saturday.
4
p. Developer will provide the public a phone number and email address for a
contact person for neighbors to reach out to if there are any construction related
concerns/comments.
q. Prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any principal building
constructed on the Property Developer will provide infrastructure to
accommodate a minimum of 5% EV Capable parking. Developer will install the
electrical panel capacity with a dedicated circuit and a continuous raceway from
the panel to the future EV parking spots (“EV Capable”).
r. Prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for any principal building
constructed on the Property Developer will design and construct a building that is
solar ready. Developer will design the roof load capacity, pre-install capped
conduit that is sized to accommodate system capacity to the main electrical room,
and install a PV main service upstream of the distribution breaker.
s. Prior to applying for a building permit for any development on the
Property Developer shall submit a FAA Form 7460 to the Federal Aviation
Administration.
t. Prior to development of the Property Developer shall apply for a
preliminary subdivision plat and comply with all applicable subdivision standards.
No building permit for a development pursuant to this Agreement shall be issued
by the City until a final plat is recorded. The landscaping buffers in Exhibit “B”
shall be subject to modification to comply with all lot and easement boundaries
established through the platting process.
u. Developer shall record this Agreement against the Property by filing this
Agreement with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
v. City agrees to publish Ordinance___of 2024 within 21 days of Developer
providing proof that this Agreement has been recorded with the Salt Lake County
Recorder.
3. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application of
any term or provision of this Agreement to a particular situation, is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining terms and provisions of this
Agreement, or the application of this Agreement to other situations, shall continue in full force
and effect unless amended or modified by mutual consent of the Parties.
4. Other Necessary Acts. Each Party shall execute and deliver to the other any
further instruments and documents as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the objectives
and intent of this Agreement.
5. Construction/Interpretation. This Agreement has been reviewed and revised
by legal counsel for both the City and Developer, and no presumption or rule that ambiguities
5
shall be construed against the drafting Party shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of
this Agreement.
6. Other Miscellaneous Terms. The singular shall include the plural; the
masculine gender shall include the feminine; “shall” is mandatory; “may” is permissive. Terms
that are undefined in this Agreement shall be interpreted using the definitions provided in
Chapter 21A.62 of the Salt Lake City Code, or its successor.
7. Covenants Running with the Land. The provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute real covenants, contract and property rights, and equitable servitudes, which shall run
with the land subject to this Agreement. The burdens and benefits of this Agreement shall bind
and inure to the benefit of each of the Parties, and to their respective successors, heirs, assigns,
and transferees. Developer shall record this Agreement against the Property with the Salt Lake
County Recorder.
8. Waiver. No action taken by any Party shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of
compliance by such Party with respect to any representation, warranty, or condition contained in
this Agreement.
9. Remedies. Either Party may, in addition to any other rights or remedies, institute
an equitable action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, enforce any covenant or agreement
herein, enjoin any threatened or attempted violation thereof, enforce by specific performance the
obligations and rights of the Parties hereto, or to obtain any remedies consistent with the
foregoing and the purpose of this Agreement.
10. Utah Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with
the laws of the State of Utah.
11. Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Each Party shall use its best efforts
and take and employ all necessary actions in good faith consistent with this Agreement to ensure
that the rights secured by the other Party through this Agreement can be enjoyed.
12. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is between the City and
Developer. No other party shall be deemed a third-party beneficiary or have any rights under
this Agreement.
13. Force Majeure. No liability or breach of this Agreement shall result from delay
in performance or nonperformance caused, directly or indirectly, by circumstances beyond the
reasonable control of the Party affected (“Force Majeure”), including, but not limited to, fire,
extreme weather, terrorism, explosion, flood, war, power interruptions, the act of other
governmental bodies, accident, labor trouble or the shortage or inability to obtain material,
service, personnel, equipment or transportation, failure of performance by a common carrier,
failure of performance by a public utility, or vandalism.
14. Entire Agreement, Counterparts and Exhibit. Unless otherwise noted herein,
this Agreement is the final and exclusive understanding and agreement of the Parties and
6
supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to all or any
part of the subject matter hereof. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be in
writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of City and Developer. The following exhibits
are attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein for all purposes: Exhibit “A” (legal
descriptions of the Property); Exhibit “B” (landscaping and development site plan).
15. Term and Termination. This Agreement includes covenants, conditions, and
restrictions regarding the development and use of Developer’s Property, which shall run with the
land in perpetuity. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions may only be modified or
terminated with the express authorization of the Salt Lake City Council.
16. REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR CITY
OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.
Developer represents that it has not: (1) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City officer or
employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (2)
retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a
commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona
fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of securing business; (3) knowingly breached
any of the ethical standards set forth in City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt
Lake City Code; or (4) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly
influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the
ethical standards set forth in City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City
Code.
17. GOVERNMENT RECORDS ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT ACT . City is
subject to the requirements of the Government Records Access and Management Act, Chapter 2,
Title 63G, Utah Code Annotated or its successor (“GRAMA”). All materials submitted by
Developer pursuant to this Agreement are subject to disclosure unless such materials are exempt
from disclosure pursuant to GRAMA. The burden of claiming an exemption from disclosure
shall rest solely with Developer. Any materials for which Developer claims a privilege from
disclosure shall be submitted marked as “Business Confidential” and accompanied by a concise
statement of reasons supporting Developer’s claim of business confidentiality. City will make
reasonable efforts to notify Developer of any requests made for disclosure of documents
submitted under a claim of business confidentiality. Developer may, at Developer’s sole
expense, take any appropriate actions to prevent disclosure of such material. Developer
specifically waives any claims against City related to disclosure of any materials required by
GRAMA.
[Signature Page to Follow]
7
EFFECTIVE as of the _____ day of , 2024.
CITY:
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a
municipal corporation of the State of Utah
By: _____________________________ By: _______________________________
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Salt Lake City Recorder
STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE
On the this day of , 2024, personally appeared before me Erin
Mendenhall, who being by me duly sworn did say for herself, that she is the Mayor of SALT
LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah municipal corporation that executed the foregoing
instrument, and the said Mayor duly acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the
same.
____________________________________
Notary Public
Approved as to form:
________________________________
City Attorney’s Office
Date:____________________________
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON FOLLOWING PAGE
8
DEVELOPER:
By: _____________________________
Its: _____________________________
By: _____________________________
Its: _____________________________
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
County of _________)
On the ____________________, personally appeared before me, ______________________,
who being by me duly sworn, did say that he executed the foregoing instrument as the
__________________ of _______________________, a ________________________, and said
person acknowledged to me that said _________________________ executed the same.
__________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC, residing in
___________ County, Utah
9
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal description of Developer’s Property located at 2722 N 2200 West and 2828 N 2200 West:
Tax ID No. 08-09-476-028-0000
PARCEL 1:
Beginning at the center of a 4 rod street at the extension of an existing fence line being 930.97
feet North from the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section
9, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and running thence along said
fence line South 89°17'15" East 231.37 feet to a found rebar and cap marking a Boundary Line
Agreement in Book 8538 at Page 5539, in the Salt Lake County Recorder's office; thence along
said Boundary Line Agreement the following two (2) courses, (1) thence South 89°52'05" East
528.95 feet; (2) thence South 89°44'09" East 437.26 feet, more or less, to an existing fence
corner marking the West line of the Salt Lake City No. 2 Ditch; thence along said fence line
South 46°26'25" East 156.46 feet; thence South 45°13'18" East 488.92 feet to an existing fence
corner marking the Boundary Line Agreement in Book 9169 at Page 3763, in the Salt Lake
County Recorder's office; thence along said Boundary Line Agreement North 89°47'55" West
428.68 feet; thence along an existing fence line North 89°24'13" West 118.06 feet; thence
continuing along said existing fence South 89°53'29" West 228.26 feet, more or less, to an
irrigation ditch; thence North along said ditch 280.40 feet, more or less, to the extension of an
existing fence line; thence along said fence line South 89°53'23" West 550.00 feet; thence North
141.20 feet, more or less, to the extension of an existing fence line; thence along said fence line
North 89°49'45" West 333.00 feet, more or less, to the center of a 4 rod street; thence North
along the center of said street 34.48 feet to the point of beginning.
LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Westerly portion of subject property lying within
the bounds of 2200 West Street.
PARCEL 1A:
A non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress by vehicular and pedestrian traffic as more
particularly defined by that certain
Grant of Access Easement and Agreement recorded December 17, 2013 as Entry No. 11777223
in Book 10199 at Page 9395
of official records.
Tax ID No. 08-10-300-012-0000
PARCEL 2:
Beginning at a point South 89°59'57" West 90.60 feet along the section line and North 473.796
feet and East 432.125 feet and North 45°34'00" West 643.198 feet and South 89°51'55" East
114.548 feet to the true point of beginning from the Northeast corner of Section 16, Township 1
North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and running thence South 89°51'55" East
516.654 feet along an old fence and boundary agreement line; thence along the Westerly right of
way of the proposed I-215 Project Number SP-0067(1)0 for the following three courses; South
10
20°02'53" West 326.750 feet; South 17°35'05" West 61.470 feet; South 24°11'59" East 23.016
feet; thence North 45°34'00" West 553.875 feet along the Northeasterly line of the Salt Lake
City Drainage Canal to the point of beginning.
Tax ID No. 08-09-476-026-0000
PARCEL 3:
Beginning 416.46 feet North and 333 feet East and 22.36 feet North from the Southwest corner
of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 1 West,
Salt Lake Base and Meridian; thence East 550 feet; thence North 257.64 feet; thence West 550
feet; thence South 257.64 feet to the point of beginning.
ALSO:
Beginning 556.46 feet North from the Southwest corner of Southeast quarter of the Southeast
quarter of Section 9, Township 1 North, Range 1 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian; thence
South 117.64 feet; thence East 333 feet; thence North 117.64 feet; thence West 333 feet to
beginning.
LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion lying within the bounds of 2200 West
Street.
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT:Petitions PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-00701
Zoning Map Amendment
2760 N., 2800 N., and 2828 N. 2200 West
STAFF CONTACT:Diana Martinez, Senior Planner
(801) 535-7215 or diana.martinez@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendations of the Planning
Commission to approve the petitions for a zoning map amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Will Channell with OCC Industrial, representing the property owner of 2800 N. and who is under contract
for the properties at approximately 2760 and 2828 N. at 2200 West, is requesting a Zoning Map
Amendment to allow the development of the properties. The proposed amendment would rezone three
parcels from AG-2 (Agricultural) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing). The subject properties, in total, are
approximately 14.33 acres (624,216 square feet). Plans for future development were not submitted with
these applications.
Two of the subject parcels front along 2200 West, and the third (triangular) parcel is to the east of the other
parcels. The area immediately to the north of the subject properties is zoned agricultural, however, it is
under the jurisdiction of Salt Lake County. The area to the direct west is zoned BP (Business Park) and has
been quickly developing over the last year with large distribution warehouses. The area immediately to the
south of the subject properties is zoned AG-2 Agricultural Zoning District. In total, including the subject
property, this area currently zoned AG-2 is about 67 acres.
On November 14, 2023, the North Point Small Area Plan was approved and adopted by the Salt Lake City
Council. The Plan’s Vision Overview was adopted with an annexation and zoning amendment policy that states
(on pg.14), “…any proposed zoning map amendment in the Transitional area will also be subject to a
development agreement aimed at realizing the plan’s vision and design standards, until the area’s zoning
regulations are adopted.”
The application request for zoning map amendment must comply with the standards of review listed in
the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Staff’s analysis shows that those standards and goals were met and
had recommended approval of these petitions to the Planning Commission with a condition of approval
that all three parcels will have a development agreement signed between the parcel owners and the City
stating the proposed development will meet the intent of the North Point Small Area Plan and that the
property owner will comply with the Development Agreement.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
●Early Notification for the January 11, 2023 Meeting –
o Notification of the proposal was sent to all property owners and tenants located within
300 feet of the subject parcels on August 5, 2022
o Notification of the proposal was sent to the Westpointe Community Council on August 5,
2022. A comment letter was submitted to the planning staff and is in the original staff
report dated January 11, 2023.
●Planning Commission Meeting –
On January 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed
zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted 7-1 to table the petitions until the
North Point Small Area Plan is approved and adopted by the City Council.
Early Notification for the December 13, 2023 Meeting-
o November 29, 2023- Public hearing notice sign posted on the property.
o December 8, 2023.-
Public hearing notice mailed.
Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve.
Planning Commission Meeting-
On December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed
zoning map amendment. The Planning Commission voted 6-2 (with one abstention) to send a
favorable recommendation for the petitions to the City Council.
PLANNING RECORDS:
a) PC Agenda of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
b) PC Minutes of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
c) PC Staff Report of January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
d) PC YouTube Video of the January 11, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
e) PC Agenda of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
f) PC Minutes of December 13, 2023, meeting Click Here)
g) PC Staff Report of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
h) PC YouTube Video of December 13, 2023, meeting (Click Here)
EXHIBITS:
1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
3. ORIGINAL PETITIONS
4. MAILING LIST
5. ORDINANCE
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(Amending the zoning of properties located at 2760 North, 2800 North, and 2828 North
2200 West Street from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map about properties located at 2760 North, 2800 North,
and 2828 North 2200 West Street from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing
District pursuant to Petitions No. PLNPCM2022-00699, PLNPCM2022-00700 and PLNPCM2022-
00701.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) held
a public hearing on December 13, 2023, on a petition submitted by Will Channel with OCC
Industrial to rezone parcels located at 2760 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-09-476-026-
0000), 2800 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-10-300-012-0000), and 2828 North 2200
West Street (Tax ID No.08-09-476-028-0000) (collectively, the “Properties”) from AG-2
Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District; and
WHEREAS, at its December 13, 2023, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (the “City Council”) on
said petitions; and
WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has
determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted
by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Properties identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall
be and hereby are rezoned from AG-2 Agricultural District to M-1 Light Manufacturing District.
SECTION 2. Condition. The zoning map amendment set forth herein is conditioned upon
2
___________________________
atherine D. Pasker, Senior City A
the owner(s) of the Property entering into a development agreement with Salt Lake City in a form
substantially similar to the latest form of development agreement presented to the City Council in
connection with this ordinance.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first
publication. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the
condition set forth in Section 2 is satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his
designee.
SECTION 4. Time. If the condition set forth in Section 2 has not been met within one year
after adoption of this ordinance, then this ordinance shall become null and void. The City Council
may, for good cause shown, extend the time period for satisfying the above condition by resolution.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
Ordinance amending zoning of 2760 N., 2800 N., and 2828 N. 2200 Westv2
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 11, 2024
By: _
K
ttorney
3
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Description of Properties to be Rezoned:
2760 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-09-476-026-0000):
SEC 09 TWNSHP 1N RNG 1W 1Q 0406,BEG 416.46 FT N & 333 FT E & 22.36 FT N FR SW
COR OF SE 1/4,OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 9, T1N, R1W, SLB & M; E 550 FT; N 257.64,FT; W 550 FT;
S 257.64 FT TO BEG. ALSO, BEG 556.46 FT N FR,SW COR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 SEC 9, T1N,
R1W, SL
2800 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No. 08-10-300-012-0000):
SEC 10 TWNSHP 1N RNG 1W 1Q 1226,BEG S 89?59'57" W 90.60 FT & N 473.796 FT & E
432.125 FT & N,45?34'00" W 643.198 FT & S 89?51'55" E 114.548 FT FR NE COR,SEC 16, T1N,
R1W, SLB & M; S 89?51'55" E 516.654 FT; S,20?02'53" W 326.750 FT; S 17?35'05" W 61.470 FT
2828 North 2200 West Street (Tax ID No.08-09-476-028-0000):
1218,BEG IN CEN OF A 4 RD STREET ( 2200 WEST ST ), N 930.97 FT FR,SW COR OF SE 1/4
OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 9, T1N, R1W, SLB & M; S,89?17'15" E 231.37 FT; S 89?52'05" E 528.95 FT; S
89?44'09",E 437.26 FT; S 46?26'25" E 156.46 FT; S 45?13'18" E 488.92,FT; N 89?47'
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received: _________________
Date sent to Council: _________________
TO:DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
STAFF CONTACT:
DOCUMENT TYPE:
RECOMMENDATION:
BUDGET IMPACT:
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
any proposed zoning map amendment in the Transitional area will also be subject to a
development agreement aimed at realizing the plan’s vision and design standards, until the area’s zoning
regulations are adopted.”
PUBLIC PROCESS
Early Notification for the January 11, 2023 Meeting
o
o
Planning Commission Meeting –
Early Notification for the December 13, 2023 Meeting-
o
o
Planning Commission Meeting-
PLANNING RECORDS:
EXHIBITS:
Item B5
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: 1791 South, 1815 South State Street, and 118 East, 120 East Coatsville Avenue
Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments (Maven State)
PLNPCM2022-00998/01203 & PLNPCM2022-00999
MOTION 1 (close and defer)
I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight))
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance.
MOTION 3 (continue hearing)
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: 1791 South, 1815 South State Street, and 118 East, 120 East Coatsville Avenue
Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments (Maven State)
PLNPCM2022-00998/01203 & PLNPCM2022-00999
BRIEFING UPDATE
During the March 19, 2024 briefing Council Members asked about potential affordable housing units in
future development on the site. The petitioner said they would like to include some affordable units but are
not able to commit to them given the current financial landscape. They are reviewing the recently adopted
affordable housing incentives to determine if those will make it more feasible to include affordable units.
The petitioner said they received concerns about potential building heights and impacts to the
neighborhood. Shadow and solar studies have been conducted to help guide building design to mitigate
impacts. In addition, the petitioner clarified that the proposal includes commercial uses on the ground
floor of the existing building, and on the State Street façade of the new building.
The following information was provided for the March 19, 2024 Council briefing and
public hearing. It is included again for background purposes.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for properties at 1791 South and
1815 South State Street, and 118 East and 120 East Coatsville Avenue in City Council District Five from
their current CC (Corridor Commercial) and R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential) zoning designations to
R-MU (Residential Mixed Use). In addition, the proposal calls for amending the Central Community
Master Plan future land use map from the current “Community Commercial” and “Low-Density
Residential” designations to “High Mixed Use.”
Item Schedule:
Briefing: March 19, 2024
Set Date: March 26, 2024
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Potential Action: May 7, 2024
Page | 2
Current R-1/5,000 and CC zoning allow buildings up to 28 feet and 30 feet respectively. (CC zoning allows
an additional 15 feet of height through the design review process.) The proposed R-MU zoning allows
residential buildings up to 75 feet high, and nonresidential buildings up to 45 feet.
Vacant single-family homes located at 118 East and 120 East Coatsville Avenue, and a vacant restaurant at
1791 South State Street would be demolished as part of the proposal. Because the proposed zoning map
amendment would permit nonresidential use of the land, a housing loss mitigation plan is required. The
plan was submitted to the City and calls for providing replacement housing to mitigate the loss of two
housing units.
The petitioner’s stated objective is to consolidate the properties and redevelop the site into a mixed-use
project. Under the current proposal there would be two primary structures; adaptive reuse of a vacant
former furniture store at 1815 South State Street into mixed use commercial and office space; and an
apartment building with approximately 150 units and ground-floor commercial space that wraps the
building. The apartments would be a mix of affordable and market rate units, and three levels of parking
with approximately 190 spaces.
The proposed apartment building is anticipated to have the following mix of apartments:
65 Studio
55 one bedroom
25 two bedroom
5 three bedroom
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposals during its May 10, 2023 meeting and held a public
hearing at which three people spoke in opposition. Concerns expressed include neighborhood impacts due
to building height, light pollution, loss of privacy for adjacent properties, traffic accessing the site on
residential streets, and parking.
When asked why the proposal includes vehicle access off Coatsville and Downington Avenues, the
petitioner stated their intent to activate the State Street frontage and not make it a parking lot. In addition,
a bus stop is in front of the property on State Street making vehicle access to the site from the same
location problematic.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward positive recommendations on
both the zoning map and future land use amendments with the following recommended
conditions:
1. A minimum 30-foot building setback required on the eastern boundary of the site that abuts single-
family residential zoning regardless of the building orientation of future development.
2. At the 30-foot setback line buildings are limited to 60 feet in height. Each added foot of building
height must be stepped back an additional one foot from the 30-foot setback line. (This does not
apply where the building is set back 45 feet or more.)
3. A 10-foot landscape buffer as defined in the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance is required along the
eastern boundary of the subject site that abuts the single-family residential zoning district. The
landscape buffer may be located within the 30-foot building setback area and must include the
following:
a. A solid fence six feet in height;
b. A four-foot-tall shrub hedge along the entire length of the landscape buffer; and
c. Shade trees planted at the rate of one tree for every 30 linear feet.
Page | 3
4. The existing building at 1815 South State Street shall be repurposed with the redevelopment of the
site.
5. These conditions apply only when the abutting properties to the east are zoned single-family
residential. If the zoning changes on the properties to the east to a zoning district that allows
building heights greater than 35 feet, these conditions no longer apply.
Area map with subject parcels outlined in red.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning and future land use map amendments, determine if
the Council supports moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. In keeping with the Council’s interest in housing affordability, the Council may wish to ask for more
information about the number of each size dwelling unit that are anticipated to be affordable and
Page | 4
for how many years, and at what percentage of AMI the developer / petitioner plans to list the
properties for rent.
2. Is the Council supportive of the Planning Commission’s recommended conditions?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Planning staff provided the following table summarizing the proposed amendments for each of the subject
parcels.
Table courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division
The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property and amending the future land use map.
Although a concept plan was included in the application materials, no formal site plan has been submitted
to the City, nor is it within the scope of the Council’s role to review the plans. Because zoning of a property
can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing
the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 6-7 of
the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the
staff report.
Consideration 1-Impact on Adjacent Residential District
As noted above, the maximum residential building height in the R-MU zoning district is 75 feet. A 30-foot
buffer is required along the rear property line. Preliminary plans submitted by the petitioner show the
proposed building 30 feet from the eastern property line that abuts single-family residential properties.
However, if the plans are reconfigured to make the eastern property line a side property line, only a 10-foot
landscape buffer would be required adjacent to single-family residential properties to the east. Planning
staff recommended the 30-foot setback on the eastern boundary which abuts R-1/5,000 zoning regardless
of building orientation. They felt this condition is necessary to ensure the setback is maintained if
development plans change or the property is sold.
Planning staff also recommended the step back requirement in addition to the 30-foot setback. Buildings
would be limited to 60 feet at the setback line without a step back. Each additional foot of building height
Page | 5
would require a one-foot step back to help reduce the building’s scale, minimize shadows, and increase
privacy for neighbors. (Note-the step back would not apply for buildings 45 feet or more from the property
line.)
Planning staff recognizes impacts to neighbors of a large building on the site will not be completely
mitigated by the recommended conditions, but believes it is a reasonable compromise that will push the
bulk of the building toward State Street and allow the site to be redeveloped.
Consideration 2-Housing Mitigation Plan
As discussed above, because the proposed zoning map amendment would permit nonresidential use of the
land, a housing loss mitigation plan is required. Options for mitigating the loss of residential housing
include providing replacement housing, paying a fee to the City’s housing trust fund based on the
difference between the housing value and replacement costs of building new units, and if deteriorated
housing exists that is not caused by deliberate indifference of the landowner, the petitioner may pay a flat
fee to the City’s housing trust fund. The petitioner submitted a plan to the City and elected to provide
replacement housing to mitigate the loss of two housing units. The plan was reviewed and approved by the
Community and Neighborhoods Director.
Consideration 3-Compliance with Master Plan Policies
The subject parcels are within the 2005 Central Community Master Plan area and the proposal does not
align with the plan’s future land use map or some policies within the plan. However, Planning staff believes
goals and objectives from more recent plans support additional density and mixed use near major
transportation corridors such as State Street.
ZONING COMPARISON
Planning staff provided the following table in Attachment C (page 32) of the Planning Commission staff
report. It is replicated here for convenience.
CC (current)R-1/5,000 (current)R-MU (proposed)
Maximum Building Height 30 feet
(An additional 15 feet of
building height can be
approved through the
design review process.)
28 feet to the ridge of the
roof or the average height of
other principal buildings on
the block face.
20 feet to the top of a flat
roof
75 feet for residential
buildings,
45 feet for nonresidential
buildings
Front Setback 15 feet Average of block face or 20
feet.
No setback is required for
multi-family buildings or
nonresidential uses.
Side Setback Corner side yard: 15 feet
Interior: None required
Corner side yard: 10 feet
Interior: 4 feet on one side,
10 feet on the other
No setback is required for
multi-family buildings or
nonresidential uses.
Rear Setback 10 feet 25% of lot depth or 20 feet,
whichever is less.
25% of lot depth or 30 feet,
whichever is less.
Permitted Uses Commercial uses including
retail sales and services,
entertainment, office and
residential.
Single-family detached
dwellings, parks, home
occupations, dormitories.
Commercial and residential
uses including high-density
residential, retail, service
commercial, and small-scale
office uses.
Minimum Lot Width 75 feet Single-family detached:
50 feet
Single-family attached:
3,000 square feet/unit
Page | 6
Single-family detached:
5,000 square feet/unit
Two-family dwellings:
8,000 square feet
Multifamily and non-
residential: No minimum
Open Space None other than required
yard areas.
60% (40% maximum
building coverage).
20%. Landscape yards,
plazas and courtyards may
count toward this
requirement.
Analysis of Factors
Attachment E (pages 41-44) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines master plan and zoning map
amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. It is Planning staff’s
opinion that the proposed master plan amendment changing the future land use map to medium-density
residential fulfills the intended outcomes of policies within Plan Salt Lake and Growing SLC. Please see the
Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through its various adopted
planning documents.
Does not comply with current
Central City Master Plan
future land use map or several
policies within the plan.
Many purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies in Plan
Salt Lake, and other more
recent plans support the
proposed amendments.
Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
The extent to which a proposed map amendment will
affect adjacent properties
Proposal has potential to
create impacts to adjacent
properties. Recommended
conditions will help mitigate
impacts.
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes and provisions of any applicable
overlay zoning districts which may impose additional
standards.
Complies
The adequacy of public facilities and services
intended to serve the subject property, including, but
not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational
facilities, police and fire protection, schools,
stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and
wastewater and refuse collection.
Complies
City Department Review
During City review of the petitions, no responding departments or divisions expressed objections to the
proposal, but stated additional comments would be provided if the property is developed.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Page | 7
• October 31, 2022 – Applications submitted.
• November 17, 2022 – Petition assigned to staff.
• November 28, 2022 – Petition routed for department review comments.
• November 29, 2022 – 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations sent to
Community Councils.
• November 30, 2022 – Early notification of the proposal sent to neighbors within 300 feet of the
development. Project posted to the online open house webpage.
• January 16, 2023 - The 45-day public comment period for recognized organizations ended. The
online open house period ended. Planning staff worked with the applicant to mitigate potential
impacts related to building height. Staff finalized the recommended conditions, and the applicant
modified their original proposal to comply with the conditions. The applicant chose to delay their
hearing with the Planning Commission because of scheduling conflicts.
• April 25, 2023 – Public hearing notice posted on property.
• April 26, 2023 - Planning Commission public hearing notice mailed to neighbors within 300 feet
of the subject site. Notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning listserv.
• May 10, 2023 - Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation.
• June 1, 2023-Draft ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office.
• June 14, 2023-Planning received draft ordinance from the Attorney’s Office.
• June 21, 2023-Transmittal received in City Council Office.
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________Date Received: _________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Salt Lake City CouncilTO: DATE:June , 2023
Darin Mano, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
________________________
SUBJECT:Maven State Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendment
(PLNPCM2022-00998 & PLNPCM2022-00999)
STAFF CONTACT:Trevor Ovenden, Principal Planner, 801-535-7168 or trevor.ovenden@slcgov.com
Meagan Booth, Principal Planner, 801-535-7213 or meagan.booth@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE:Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The City Council follows the Planning Commission s recommendation and
approve the requested Zoning Map and Master Plan amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT:None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Matthew Ratelle with the Colmena Group representing the property owner initiated the following
amendment requests in anticipation of a future redevelopment project. (see table and maps on next page)
The proposal includes two requests: (1) to amend the Central Community Future Land use map from
Community Commercial and Low Density Residential to High Mixed Use and (2) to amend the zoning
map designation from R-1/5,000 (Single Family Residential) and CC (Commercial Corridor) to R-MU
(Residential Mixed Use). The project area is approximately 1.37 acres or 59,677.2 square feet includes
the following four properties:
1791 S State Street
1815 S State Street
118 E Coatsville Ave
120 E Coatsville Ave
A formal development proposal has not been submitted at this time. More information, including the
Planning Commission Staff Report.
HOUSING LOSS MITIGATION
Per Chapter 18.97 of City Ordinance, any petition for a zoning change that would permit a nonresidential
use of land, that includes within its boundaries residential dwelling units, may not be approved until a
housing mitigation plan is approved by the city. The applicant submitted a housing loss mitigation plan,
which can be found in the Planning Commission Staff Report, that satisfied Housing Loss Mitigation
requirements by providing replacement housing. The final plan was evaluated and approved by the
this petition.
Address Current
Zoning
Proposed
Zoning
Current Future Land Use
Designation
Proposed Future Land
Use Designation
1791 S State
Street
CC RMU Community Commercial High Mixed Use
1815 S State
Street
CC RMU Community Commercial High Mixed Use
118 E Coatsville
Ave
R-1/5,000 RMU Low Density Residential High Mixed Use
120 E Coatsville
Ave
R-1/5,000 RMU Low Density Residential High Mixed Use
Existing Future land use map designations
(Central Community Master Plan)
Subject properties and current zoning
PUBLIC PROCESS:
November 29, 2022 Staff sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community
organizations to the Liberty Wells and Ballpark Community Council. An email in support of the
request was received from the chair of the Liberty Wells Community Council.
November 30, 2022 Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were
provided early notification of the proposal.
November 30, 2022 The project was posted to the Online Open House webpage.
April 25, 2023 Public hearing notice sign posted on the property
April 26, 2023 Public hearing notice mailed. Public notice posted on City and State websites
and Planning Division list serve
Planning Commission Hearing and Recommendation
On May 10, 2023 the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and held a public hearing. The hearing
can be viewed here beginning at 1:29:07. A brief summary of the of the key topics that were discussed is
as follows:
Traffic circulation and vehicular access to the site.
The applicant explained that vehicular access will not be off of State Street because of the
existing bus stop in front of the site and their goal of making the central area a lively,
urban space.
Impact regarding building height
Several commissioners made comments regarding the potential impact on adjacent
neighbors but clarified that they support the project and believe it will be beneficial to the
neighborhood.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of approval with the
following recommended conditions:
1. A minimum 30-foot building setback shall be required from the eastern boundary of the subject
site that abuts the single-family residential zoning district, regardless of the building orientation
of future development.
2. At the 30-foot setback line buildings are limited to 60 feet in height. Each additional foot of
building height must be stepped back an additional one foot from the 30-foot setback line. This
does not apply where the building is set back 45 feet or more.
3. A 10-foot landscape buffer as defined in the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance is required along
the eastern boundary of the subject site that abuts the single-family residential zoning district. The
landscape buffer may be located within the 30-foot building setback area and must include the
following:
a. A solid fence six feet in height;
b.
c. Shade trees planted at the rate of one tree for every 30 linear feet.
4. The existing building at 1815 S State shall be repurposed with the redevelopment of the site.
5. These conditions apply only when the abutting properties to the east are zoned single-family
residential. In the event that the zoning changes on the properties to the east to a zoning district
that allows building heights greater than 35 feet, these conditions no longer apply.
One public comment was received after publication of the Planning Commission staff report and can be
found in exhibit 4.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of May 10, 2023 (Click to Access)
b)PC Minutes of May 10, 2023 (Click to Access)
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of May 10, 2023 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Project Chronology
2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3) Comment Received After Publication of PC Staff Report
4) Mailing List
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
2) NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
3) COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER PUBLICATION OF PC STAFF REPORT
4) MAILING LIST
1. PROJECT
CHRONOLOGY
Project Chronology
Petitions:PLNPCM2022-00998 & PLNPCM2022-00999
October 31, 2022 Applications submitted.
November 17, 2022 Petition assigned to staff.
November 28, 2022 Petition routed for Department Review Comments.
November 29, 2022 Staff sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community
organizations to the Community Councils.
November 30, 2022 Neighbors within 300 feet of the development were provided early
notification of the proposal.
November 30, 2022 The project was posted to the Online Open House webpage.
January 16, 2023 The 45-day public comment period for recognized organizations
ended. The online open house period ended. Staff worked with the
applicant to mitigate potential impacts related to building height.
Staff finalized the recommended conditions and the applicant
modified their original proposal to comply with the conditions. The
applicant chose to delay their hearing with the Planning
Commission because of scheduling conflicts.
April 25, 2023 Public hearing notice sign posted on the property
April 26, 2023 Public hearing notice mailed. Public notice posted on City and
State websites and Planning Division list serve
May 10, 2023 Planning Commission Public Hearing and recommendation
June 1, 2023
June 14, 2023
2. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2022-00998 and PLNPCM2022-00999
Maven State Zoning Map and Master Plan Amendments Salt Lake City has received these
amendment requests, specified below, from Matthew Ratelle with the Colmena Group representing the
property owner. The intent of these amendment requests is to accommodate a redevelopment proposal
to be submitted at a later date. The project is within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano.
A. Master Plan Amendment (Case number PLNPCM2022-00999)
1791 & 1815 S State Street
designation from Community Commercial to High Mixed Use.
118 & 120 E Coatsville Ave Amend the Central Community Master
Use designation from Low Density Residential to High Mixed Use.
B. Zoning Map Amendment (Case number PLNPCM2022-00998)
1791 & 1815 S State Street rezone from CC Commercial Corridor to R-MU Residential Mixed
Use.118 & 120 E Coatsville Ave rezone from R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential to R-MU
Residential Mixed Use.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments
regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning
this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
PLACE: Electronic and in-person options.
451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person
opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx
connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also
be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to
council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the
Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Trevor
Ovenden at 801-535-7168 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or
via e-mail at trevor.ovenden@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at
https://citizenportal.slcgov.com
PLNPCM2022-00998 and PLNPCM2022-00999.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids
and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please
contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service
711.
3. COMMENT NOT INCLUDED
WITH PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
4. MAILING LIST
Item B6
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts
PLNPCM2023-00444
MOTION 1 (close and defer)
I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight))
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance.
MOTION 3 (continue hearing)
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Window Requirements for New Construction in the City’s Local Historic Districts
PLNPCM2023-00444
BRIEFING UPDATE
During the March 26, 2024 briefing Planning staff confirmed that the proposed changes only apply to new
construction in historic districts, and not to remodels or renovations of existing buildings. Vinyl windows
have not been approved for use in local historic districts, but the restrictions are not in City code. This
would codify the restrictions.
During a discussion about not allowing the use of vinyl windows in new construction within local historic
districts, Council Members asked whether the restrictions would work against affordable housing
incentives. The Council is working to promote geographically equitable affordability and would not want
new regulations to be an impediment. Planning staff noted that the proposal allows for vinyl windows on
building faces that cannot be seen from the street. They pointed out that windows are often a significant
cost in larger developments, and the proposed changes are intended to be sensitive to costs while
maintaining a preservation program. Planning said a variety of window materials including wood, clad
wood, fiberglass, and a composite of wood and other materials would be allowed under the proposal.
The following information was provided for the March 26, 2024 Council briefing. It is
included again for background purposes.
The Council will be briefed about a proposal requested by Mayor Mendenhall to update the zoning
ordinance and text within the City’s Historic Residential Design Guidelines and Historic Apartment &
Multifamily Building Design Guidelines handbooks. The changes would apply to the use of vinyl windows
for new construction in the city’s 15 local historic districts (LHDs) and approximately 150 designated
Item Schedule:
Briefing: March 26, 2024
Set Date: April 2, 2024
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Potential Action: May 7, 2024
Page | 2
landmark sites. (Note: Two additional LHDs, Princeton Heights and Upper Yale, are in process as of the
writing of this report. If adopted as proposed, these requirements would also apply to those LHDs.)
A landmark site is defined in Chapter 21A.62.010 Salt Lake City Code as:
Any historic site that has been designated in accordance with [City Code] or any site on the Salt
Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. A landmark site includes an individual building, structure
or feature or an integrated group of buildings, structures or features on a single site. Such sites are
of exceptional importance to the city, state, region or nation and impart high artistic, historic or
cultural values. A landmark site clearly conveys a sense of time and place and enables the public to
interpret the historic character of the site.
Planning staff noted the proposed changes include:
Adds a section to 21A.34.020(H) to clarify prohibited window material (vinyl) and window
location, as well as a minimum window installation depth (3”).
Adds additional language to the Residential and Historic Apartments & Multi-family Design
Guidelines to clarify historically appropriate window materials (wood, clad wood, and fiberglass) in
new construction, the appropriate location and use of vinyl windows in new construction, and the
use of aluminum storefront windows at the ground floor where there is a commercial use or
amenity space associated with a multi-family building.
To reiterate, the proposed changes would apply only to new construction in the city’s LHDs and landmark
sites.
Page 4 of the Planning Commission staff report included the following goals for the proposed ordinance
update:
Ensure that the ordinance standards and design guidelines are met with regard to windows
installed in new construction projects.
Provide consistency in windows approved for new construction projects; address the specific use of
vinyl windows and window installation.
The Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) reviewed the proposed text amendment at its November 2,
2023 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. The Commission voted unanimously to
forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed text amendment at its January 10, 2024 meeting and
held a public hearing at which no one spoke. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. Is the Council supportive of allowing vinyl windows on non-street facing façades of new buildings
in LHDs and landmark sites on a case-by-case basis?
2. Is the Council supportive of requiring a minimum 3” window reveal on new buildings in LHDs and
landmark sites?
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Page | 3
Salt Lake City, along with many other cities throughout the country, has design guidelines for infill
construction in historic districts that help define elements of historic buildings that should be considered
for new construction. This is to help integrate new buildings into historic areas of the city. These guidelines
differ from those for alterations to existing historic structures, which include and conserve historic
materials and building details.
Planning staff noted that the evolution of standards for both new construction and historic buildings
through the years has gradually helped projects succeed in design, length of review process, and required
design revisions. It is Planning’s opinion that the proposed standards will build on the current ordinance
by providing improved clarity for applicants, Planning staff, and the HLC when evaluating new
construction.
The following issues were identified by Planning staff as they relate to window materials and installation in
LHDs:
Current design guidelines discourage the use of vinyl windows as they are not considered to be
historically appropriate and are not a durable material. However, these windows are not
prohibited. Design standards and guidelines encourage the use of durable materials but there is not
consistency in defining what materials are acceptable. This resulted in the HLC requiring wood or
metal clad wood windows on some projects, fiberglass or composite materials on others, and
approval of vinyl windows for many projects. The updated ordinance provides additional clarity
and consistency.
The City’s design guidelines and standards do not specify the depth of a window’s reveal, or how far
it is set back from the wall plane. Section 21A.34.020.H(6)(c) of the City’s zoning ordinance states
“Windows and other openings are incorporated in a manner that reflects patterns, materials, and
detailing established in the district and/or setting.” Planning staff noted that “This is based on
traditional building patterns and is intended to provide variation in the wall plane, creating visual
interest….” [Administration’s transmittal, page 4.] To help clarify this, the proposed ordinance calls
for window reveals to be a minimum of three inches.
Planning staff identified inconsistencies in the City’s Residential Design Guidelines, and Historic
Apartment & Multifamily Building Guidelines documents as they relate to appropriate window
materials and installation. The proposed ordinance amends language in these documents for
consistency and clarity.
Planning staff noted the Historic Landmark Commission regularly addresses issues of using vinyl windows,
and not setting windows back from the wall plane. Of particular concern are larger multi-family residential
developments that have many windows on several floors. Builders can save a considerable amount of
money if they choose less expensive, often vinyl, windows.
In addition, recent design trends frequently use materials that place windows at the wall plane rather than
including a reveal of 3 or 4 inches. Setting windows back from the wall plane creates visual interest as light
and shadow patterns vary throughout the day, and seasons.
Planning reviewed current design guidelines for using vinyl windows in new construction in cities
throughout the United States including Charleston, SC; Boise, ID; Charlotte, NC; Denver, CO; Nashville,
TN; and Ogden, UT, among others. Most of the cities do not allow vinyl windows in new construction,
though some allow them depending on location and visibility from the street. For the complete list, please
refer to page 4 of the Planning Commission staff report.
Page | 4
KEY CONSIDERATION
Planning staff identified one key consideration related to the proposal, found on pages 5-7 of the Planning
Commission staff report, and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning staff
report.
Consideration 1 – Compliance with City Goals, Policies, and Master Plans:
Planning staff found the proposed amendments align with the following:
The City’s 2011 Preservation Philosophy,
The 2012 Community Preservation Plan, and
Plan Salt Lake (2015)
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment E (pages 21-22) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are
summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as
stated through its various adopted planning documents.
Complies
Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may impose additional standards.
Complies
The extent to which a proposed text amendment
implements best current, professional practices of urban
planning and design.
Complies
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• January 2023 – Petition assigned to Lex Traughber, Senior Planner.
• March 2, 2023 – Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) work session.
• May 4, 2023 –
o Tour with HLC to view examples of windows in and near the Capitol Hill and South
Temple LHDs.
o HLC work session.
• June 6, 2023 – Petition initiated by Mayor Mendenhall.
• August 16, 2023 – Notice sent to all recognized organizations requesting comments on the
proposed zoning ordinance text, and design guidelines language.
• August 21, 2023 – Online open house posted to Planning Division website requesting comments
on the proposed zoning ordinance text, and design guidelines language.
Page | 5
• October 19, 2023 – HLC public hearing notice posted to City and State websites and Planning
Division listserv.
• October 23, 2023 – HLC meeting notice posted at Marmalade, Sweet, Anderson Foothill, and
Main Libraries.
• November 2, 2023 – HLC public hearing. The Commission suggested some minor wording
changes and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
• January 10, 2024 – Planning Commission public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to
forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
• January 11, 2024 – Planning staff requested an ordinance from the Attorney’s Office.
• January 26, 2024 – Ordinance from the Attorney’s Office received by Planning Division.
• February 22, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office.
Item B7
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan - Connect SLC
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action.
MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date.
MOTION 3 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING & ADOPT
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance replacing the 1996
Transportation Master Plan with Connect SLC as the Citywide Transportation Plan.
MOTION 4 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Citywide Transportation Plan: “Connect SLC”
NEW INFORMATION
The Citywide Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC sets the 20-year vision and transportation policies
umbrella that all transportation related plans, programs, and projects fit under. Note that the City is moving
away from using the phrase “master plan” when referring to Council-adopted policy documents. This Citywide
Transportation Plan would replace the 1996 Transportation Master Plan. The overall policy direction of the
plan is to focus on helping people move around the City regardless of the transportation mode they choose; it’s
neither autocentric nor anti-automobile. The draft plan reflects a desire to be proactive with changing the City’s
streetscapes to meet the needs of all users across transportation modes. The Council held a midpoint check in
briefing on the Plan back in November 2022. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to forward a
favorable recommendation to the Council in November 2023. The Council’s public hearing is scheduled for
April 16 and could vote to adopt the plan on May 7 or May 21. The Council has the authority to add, remove, or
modify parts of the plan before adoption.
See Attachment 1 with pages 45-49 of the Plan for an overview of all the policies, strategies, and actions. The
Citywide Transportation Plan is not a list of capital projects to improve transportation which will appear in the
forthcoming Capital Asset Plan (a five to 10-year Capital Improvement Program or CIP Plan). Rather, the plan
proposes eight core policies called “Key Moves” that each have multiple strategies and specific implementation
actions to advance the 20-year transportation vision for the City. For example, Key Move 6 Low-emissions
Mobility Options has four strategies numbers 6.1 – 6.4 and each of the strategies has multiple implementation
actions listed underneath. There are over 60 specific actions to implement the key moves.
Council Member Recent Areas of Interest and Feedback
Below is a list of Council Member’s areas of interest and feedback from prior briefings and recent discussions
about the draft plan and related topics. The list identifies which key moves and supporting strategies relevant
to the topic for easier reference. The list is not comprehensive, is in no particular order, and provided for
discussion purposes.
Implementing the Livable Streets traffic calming program
- Key move 2 Zero Traffic Deaths and strategies 2.1 and 2.2, key move 3 Great Networks for Active
Mobility strategy 3.1, and key move 8 Operationalize Complete Streets strategies 8.1 and 8.2
- See policy question #3 about adding a Livable Streets program implementation policy goal
- The program moves the City’s transportation safety efforts into a more proactive approach, however,
there are limits to what the City can do on roads owned and controlled by UDOT and railroad crossings
Project Timeline:
1st Briefing: November 10, 2022
2nd Briefing & Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
3rd Briefing: May 7, 2024 (if needed)
Potential Adoption Vote: May 7 or 21, 2024
Page | 2
Mitigating Westside transportation challenges caused by freight trains blocking City streets
- Key move 5 Healing the East-West Divide and strategies 5.1 – 5.4
- This is identified as the City’s single greatest transportation challenge
- The Council funded $150,000 in the FY2024 annual budget for train crossing safety signs to provide
better notice on upcoming freight trains blocking a street and the potential duration. The intersection
of 900 West and South Temple was selected as the initial site to pilot the new service. Delivery and
installation of the signs is anticipated this spring
- See section below with an update on the Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Federal
Planning Grant to study transportation solutions to the east-west divide
Demand management of greater downtown curb space and parking
- Key move 6 Low-emissions Mobility Options and strategies 6.1 – 6.4
- Council Members recently raised this topic in Budget Amendment #3 which proposes funding to
replace all the downtown parking pay stations. The existing policies, fees, and placements would
remain but be evaluated for potential changes after the public becomes accustomated to the new
stations (a change management approach)
- The Council is tentatively scheduled to vote on the funding at the April 16 formal meeting
- The new stations include features that could facilitate implementing some of the actions identified in
the plan
Improve alleyways as part of the City’s transportation network
- Key move 3 Great Networks for Active Mobility strategies 3.1 – 3.3 and key move 7 Places for People
strategy 7.2
- There are approximately 80 miles of alleyways in the City but many are not well suited for mobility
purposes because they’re disconnected from preferred travel routes and lack of regular ongoing
maintenance
Supporting housing placement and density near transportation centers and transit-oriented development
- Key move 4 Transit Friendly Neighborhoods strategies 4.1 – 4.3
- In December, the Council acting as the RDA Board recently adopted a housing and transit
reinvestment zones or HTRZs policy and is exploring multiple potential zones in the City. HTRZs are a
new state authorized tool addressing housing around public transit stations
Improve public transportation options to and sustainability in the Northwest Quadrant (NWQ)
- Key move 3 Great Networks for Active Mobility strategies 3.1 – 3.3, key move 4 Transit Friendly
Neighborhoods strategies 4.1 – 4.3 , and key move 7 Places for People strategy 7.1
- The demand for greater transportation options for workers to get to and from the NWQ has increased
as the area experiences high growth. Some employers have commented that the lack of transportation
options is a talent recruitment and retention barrier
- Council Members have highlighted the importance of water conservation and managing stormwater
runoff on City streets is particularly salient in the NWQ near the Great Salt Lake
Explore separating vehicles from non-vehicle transportation modes to improve safety
- Key move 2 Zero Traffic Deaths and strategies 2.1 and 2.2, key move 3 Great Networks for Active
Mobility strategies 3.1 – 3.3, and key move Healing the East-West Divide and strategies 5.1 – 5.4
- Council Members have mentioned under crossings (currently one under Foothill Drive is conceptually
being explored) and overpasses for pedestrians as safety tools to further separate vehicle traffic from
other modes of transportation
Advocate for fare capping so public transit users don’t overpay
- Key move 4 Transit Friendly Neighborhoods strategies 4.1 and 4.2, key move 6 Low-emissions Mobility
Options and strategies 6.1
- Fare capping has been implemented by public transit agencies in other states. After a passenger buys
short-time tickets in an amount equivalent to the cost of a monthly pass then they automatically get
transit access the rest of the month as if they had purchased a monthly pass
Page | 3
Action Plan, Metrics, and Next Steps
See Attachment 2 for the 30 proposed metrics organized by key move policy
An Action Plan is proposed that documents how progress will be tracked and communicated to the community.
This would follow adoption of the Citywide Transportation Plan and likely require funding. The Transportation
Division stated this would be an important first step after adoption. The preference is to “contract with a non-
profit organization that will provide a highly experienced a research fellow for one year to review City policies
and procedures to identify conflicts and gaps, and to make recommendations that will bring practices across
the City into alignment with one another and with Connect SLC.” The fellow could also work on systems to
track the proposed metrics. See policy question #4 about funding in the next annual budget for an Action Plan.
Council Members have mentioned multiple performance metrics that would help show success in advancing
the City’s transportation policies such as impact of transportation infrastructure changes on sales tax revenues
from surrounding businesses, reduced fatalities and crashes, shorter wait times for east-west travel, reducing
the number, location, and duration of streets blocked by trains, improved air quality, less speeding, shifting
trips away from vehicles to other transportation modes, etc. Some of these are already tracked either by the City
or other entities while some metrics would require new systems and funding to collect and analyze the data.
Below are examples of next steps for each of the eight key moves. See policy question #2 about the Council
sharing their top priorities with the Administration to implement the Citywide Transportation Plan’s policies
and inform future budget requests.
- Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Engagement – Hiring transportation staff with diverse language
skills and cultural backgrounds that better represent the community population being served.
- Key Move 2: Zero Traffic Deaths –
o Consider “near miss” identification technology software to expand our understanding of where
collisions occur.
o Creating a position dedicated to implementing this policy. Note that the Council added four
transportation planner FTEs in the FY2023 annual budget to facilitate faster implementation
of the Livable Streets traffic calming program.
- Key Move 3: Great Networks for Active Mobility – Funding CIP transportation programs such as
Livable Streets traffic calming, neighborhood byway, safer pedestrian crossings, and midblock
walkways.
- Key Move 4: Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods –
o Continue the frequent bus service routes partnership with UTA as part of Funding Our Future
o Fund mobility hubs in residential neighborhoods to improve access to transit and supporting
amenities
- Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide – Identify local matching funds for upcoming federal grant
applications to implement transportation solutions from the Reconnecting Communities federal
planning grant. See policy question #5 on this topic and the update about the study later in this report.
- Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options – Develop a parking strategy and curbspace
management strategy for the greater downtown and potentially Sugar House. Note that the Council is
scheduled to consider funding downtown parking pay station replacements in Budget Amendment #3
on April 16.
- Key Move 7: Places for People – Expand the City’s alleyways program to activate these spaces and
integrate with transportation networks.
- Key Move 8: Operationalize Complete Streets – Evaluate policies and procedures across programs and
departments to identify gaps and areas to align them with the Citywide Transportation Plan.
Page | 4
Policy Questions
1. Modify or Add Policies and Actions – Does the Council agree with the eight core policies called “Key
Moves” in the plan? Does the Council see any policies, strategies, and/or implementation actions that
should be modified or are missing? See Attachment 1 with pages 45-49 of the Plan for an overview of
all the policies, strategies, and actions.
2. Next Steps for the Eight Core Policies Called Key Moves – The Council may wish to share top priorities
with the Administration about what next steps are most important to help inform future budget,
staffing, and resource requests. for each of the Key Moves and whether progress could not happen on
some without new funding, fulltime employees, technology, or other resources.
3. Livable Streets Program Implementation Policy Goal – The Council has expressed a desire to fully
implement the City’s Livable Street traffic calming program on a faster time than the 20 years
estimated based on funding levels the past few years. The Council may wish to discuss with the
Administration whether to explicitly make this a policy goal and metric in the Citywide Transportation
Plan. The forthcoming Capital Asset Plan could estimate funding levels needed annually to achieve this
goal. Fully implementing the program across all 113 zones is estimated to cost $52 million for the
remaining 104 zones yet to be funded ($500,000 average cost per zone).
4. Funding for an Action Plan and Metrics to Measure Progress over 20-years – The Council may wish to
ask the Administration to include funding in the FY2025 annual budget for the proposed Action Plan,
review of city policies and procedures for alignment with the new Citywide Transportation Plan, and
systems to track the proposed metrics.
5. Identify Local Matching Funds for Reconnecting Communities Federal Construction Grants – The
Council may wish to ask the Administration to recommend in future budget openings local matching
funds for anticipated federal grant applications to construct east-west transportation solutions. The
Council previously discussed that the timing of the Reconnecting Communities final study may not
align with the limited funding opportunities offered under the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law.
Public Comments
A few constituents spoke at the general public comment portion of recent Council formal meetings and at the
Planning Commission’s public hearing. The comments focused on two topics: (1) improving safety for non-
vehicle travel through construction zones and (2) adding the Rio Grande Plan or elements thereof to include
the concept of undergrounding sections of railroad tracks through the greater downtown area.
Improving Safety for Non-vehicle Travel through Construction Zones
Strategy 3.2 has an implementation action to improve work zone standards that could address the issue raised
by the constituent. It calls for the City to “adopt more robust standards and guidelines, putting more resources
toward enforcement, and providing training on updated standards to help make sure people have a seamless
travel experience during construction” (page 73). The constituent suggested further actions the City could take
including additional resources for enforcement of traffic laws, especially through construction zones, which
could include the Police Motors Squad, the Police Civilian Response Team, photo radar, etc. Another
suggestion was requiring a site plan that accommodates travel spaces for all types of users when issuing a
building permit (e.g., covered pedestrian walkways when construction temporarily closes a sidewalk and/or
bike lane with particular focus on the downtown and areas with a greater number of non-vehicle travelers).
The Rio Grande Plan / Undergrounding Sections of Railroad Tracks
Key Move #5 is Healing the East – West Divide and the constituent’s comment fits within Strategy 5.2 Provide
safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks and the implementation action to develop
bold concepts to repair and build community. The action includes five “Big Ideas” (pages 102 – 104) that reflect
elements of the community-driven Rio Grande Plan:
- Bury Interstate 15
- Trench the train
- Reconsider freeway ramps
- Break the berm
- Integrate development
Page | 5
City Awarded Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Federal Planning Grant
Since the November 2022 briefing, the City applied for and in February 2023 was awarded a Reconnecting
Communities planning grant. The grant is funding a study on transportation solutions to heal the east-west
divide. The proposed study process received approval in February by the Federal Highways Administration
office in Washington D.C. This allows the agreements to be executed and the study to begin in earnest.
Study Budget
The study has a total budget of $3.74 million. UDOT is acting as the financial administrator for the City. The
Federal Highway Administration preferred this arranged in part because UDOT already has the systems to
regularly manage federal transportation funds and meet the compliance requirements. The budget includes:
- $1.97 million from the federal reconnecting communities planning grant
- $1.24 million from the General Fund
- $500,000 from UTA
- $25,000 from the RDA
- $5,000 from Public Utilities
Timing of Study Completion may not Align with Federal Implementation Grant Application Deadlines
Council Member have expressed interest to the Administration about submitting federal applications for
implementation funding. Those applications may need to be submitted before the study is finalized, which
could be in two years. There are limited federal funding opportunities to implement the results of the study
but the largest federal grants are scheduled to only be available for two or three more years. Most of these
construction grants are authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
Congressional authorization would be needed to extend most of these construction and implementation
grants beyond the next two or three years. At a transportation conference, Council staff learned that the U.S.
Department of Transportation’s implementation grants are anticipated to prioritize applications that have
greater matching funds and include a coalition of participating agencies.
Planning Commission Recommended Two Changes to the Plan
The Planning Commission held a follow up briefing and accepted public comment at the November 8, 2023
meeting, and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. The Commission
also unanimously passed a second motion that:
“With an additional recommendation that Section 1.3 be amended to read, Strategy 1.3 facilitates long
term dialogue between the City, the local community, and other regional partners. For Strategy 2.1 to
establish a vision zero action plan, to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and
awareness about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City.”
The Transportation Division updated the language in the specific sections for strategies 1.3 (page 57) and 2.1
(page 62) to reflect the Commission’s motion. The overview of key moves, strategies, and actions on Page 46
was inadvertently not updated and will be as part of an updated transmittal for the adoption vote tentatively
scheduled for May 7.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Overview of Policies, Strategies, and Actions in Citywide Transportation Plan taken from pages 45-49
2. Citywide Transportation Plan Metrics by Key Move Policies
− Information below was provided to the Council at the November 10, 2022, midpoint check in briefing −
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration transmitted a status report on efforts to update the City’s Transportation Master Plan. The
Council adopted the last plan in 1996. It provides high-level transportation policy direction for the City which
influences other plans, programs, budgets, projects, studies and more. The new plan is called Connect SLC. It
covers all modes of transportation through the City instead of an auto-centric focus. This briefing is a chance
for the Council to provide policy feedback, hear community priorities received through public engagement, and
Page | 6
discuss the current recommendations and direction. Council feedback will be incorporated into development of
a draft plan which is expected to be available next year.
The City has many plans that fit under the umbrella of the Transportation Master Plan such as the 2015 Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan, the 2017 Transit Master Plan, the recently completed Sugar House Local Link
Study and many others. These more specific plans and studies include project recommendations that advance
the City’s Transportation Master Plan policies.
The Transportation Division worked with a Community Advisory Council throughout the process of developing
the values, policy goals and priorities for the upcoming plan update. This included site visits and workshops
such as experiencing the west-east divide firsthand for those unfamiliar with it. The top values based on public
feedback which are being used to guide development of the Plan are: air quality and the environment,
reliability, safety, affordability, ease of use, equity, and access to opportunities.
Goal of the briefing: Review the draft values and policy direction developed based on public engagement
and provide feedback to be incorporated into the draft Transportation Master Plan update.
POLICY QUESTIONS
The below questions are meant to highlight Council Member priorities, areas of interest and potential topics
for the briefing discussion.
1. West-East Divide – To what degree should addressing the east-west transportation problem be
prioritized in the new Plan? See Additional Info section for a federal grant the City applied for to study
potential solutions to this problem.
2. Performance Metrics – What policy goals could the Plan advance that should be evaluated? For
example, reduced fatalities and crashes, shorter wait times for east-west travel, reducing at-grade
railroad and street crossings, improved air quality, less speeding, shifting trips away from vehicles to
other transportation modes, etc.
3. Traffic Calming – How does the new Plan build upon the City’s new Livable Streets Program which
redesigns the public right of way to implement traffic calming?
4. Alleyways – How should the Plan address alleyways? The City has considered some alleyways as being
for mobility and transportation while others might be better suited for activation of other uses. See
Additional Info section for details on City funding for alleyways. The Council may wish to ask the
Administration if ongoing funding for alleyway maintenance will be recommended in future budgets.
5. Accessibility Standards – Does the City have an ordinance or policy designating ADA accessibility the
basic standard for all transportation infrastructure investments? How would this be reflected in the
new Plan?
6. Partnerships – To what extent do the City’s transportation policy goals depend upon support from
railroad companies, the Utah Transit Authority, the Utah Department of Transportation, and other
external partners?
7. Students and Schools – How does the City support students traveling to and from schools? Are there
additional policies that could help such as the State’s Safe Routes to School program or feedback from
the School District and parents that should be considered?
8. Keeping up with Technology – How should new and emerging transportation technologies be reflected
in the plan such as super-fast electric vehicle charging stations, drones, self-driving vehicles, air taxies,
delivery robots, etc.?
9. Education and Enforcement - Should public education and enforcement be part of the Plan? The
Council Office has received public comments that bus stops, bike lanes and sidewalks are sometimes
blocked by parked vehicles, vehicles idling, scooters, and obstructions to ADA ramps.
Page | 7
ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
City Applied for Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Federal Grant
The City was not awarded a federal RAISE grant and is awaiting response to the RCP application. The grant
would fund the analysis & prioritization of solutions to the east-west divide through transportation
infrastructure changes that encourage connectivity and community stabilization. Transportation is proposing
to study the following intersections: north-south I-15 and rail corridor and east-west crossings (600 North, 200
South, 400 South, 800 South, 900 South/9-line Trail, 1300 South, 1700 South and 2100 South.)
Grant funding: $1,970,000 from U.S. Dept. of Transportation
Match: $1,770,000 – Sources: $1,240,000 from Funding our Futures (BAM#4); UTA $500,000; RDA/Arts
Council; $25,000, Public Utilities $5,000
Alleyways Funding
In FY2021 the Council approved $200,000 in one time money for a pilot program for alleyway maintenance
and improvements. The funding was from the County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation. This funding
was used to start a pilot program where selected alleys with support of adjacent residents received pavement
rehabilitation treatments, vegetation was removed and amenities were added such as flowerbeds, art, and
lighting. As part of FY2023 CIP the Council approved $142,919 from the General Fund for alleyway
improvements which could include continuing the pilot program. Previously, the City did not have dedicated
funding for alleyway improvements. The limited available funding for public right of way projects was focused
on street reconstructions, ADA accessibility improvements and ongoing maintenance.
ACRONYMS
ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BAM – Budget Amendment
HTRZ – Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone
NWQ – Northwest Quadrant
RCP – Reconnecting Communities Pilot federal grant
RDA – Redevelopment Agency
TBD – To Be Determined
UTA – Utah Transit Authority
Key Moves are how we move to action
This section describes the eight Connect SLC Key Moves as well as their strategies, actions, and
evaluation metrics. The Key Moves are:
Authentic and
Intentional
Engagement
Healing the East-
West Divide
Low-Emissions
Mobility Options
Great Networks
Places for People
Transit Friendly
Neighborhoods
Operationalize
Complete Streets
DOWNTOWN
45
Attachment 1
Overview of Policies, Strategies, and Actions in Citywide Transportation Plan taken from pages 45-49
KEY MOVE 2
Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all.
Action: Convene a Vision Zero working group
Action: Analyze crash history and create a plan for action
2.2 Create safer streets
Action: Take advantage of federal funding opportunities
Action: Focus on high-injury corridors and intersections
Action: Reduce vehicle speeds
KEY MOVE 1
Authentic and Intentional Engagement
Build lasting relationships with community members to empower
diverse voices at the planning table.
people where they are
Action: Partner with Community-Based Organizations in equity areas and
Action: Give communities agency in planning contexts and empower
Action: Compensate community participants to value their time and
contributions
collaborative co-creation
Overview of Key Moves, strategies, and actions
Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan46
1.1 Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices
Action: Improve staff understanding of the local community by meeting
build capacity for public engagement
Action: Center community input and needs in directing future
investments for the Westside
1.2 Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation
neighborhood voices in leading outreach efforts
1.3 Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City and the
local community
Action: Establish embedded community focus groups or advisory panels
Action: Actively demonstrate the outcomes of community input
Action: Update the engagement guide with a workplan for recurring,
Zero Traffic Deaths
2.1 Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan
Action: Embrace the Safe Systems approach to traffic safety
KEY MOVE 3
Invest in our active transportation network to improve
KEY MOVE 4
Transit Friendly Neighborhoods
Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel
advancing transit
Action: Improve access-to-transit infrastructure to complete
Great Networks for Active Mobility
connections and health outcomes.
3.1 Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity
Action: Designate a Pedestrian Priority Network
Action: Adopt crossing guidelines
Action: Identify the greatest needs for improving acti ve mobility
3.2 Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options
Action: Implement low-stress facility design
Action: Adopt an equitable shared mobility policy
Action: Improve work zone standards
3.3 Create active spaces
Action: Create slow, shared, and car-free streets
Action: Activate alleys
in Salt Lake City.
4.1 Make transit convenient and reliable
Action: Institutionalize SLC and UTA partnership with a joint taskforce on
Action: Expand the city's bus lane and transit signal priority (TSP) network
4.2 Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces
Action : Expand SLC's Downtown Ambassadors program to support and
staff transit facilities
Action : Work with UTA to upgrade bus stops in SLC with
passenger amenities
Action: Harness technology to modernize major transit facilities
and waiting areas
4.3 Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option
Action : Establish multimodal mobility hubs in local areas
of importance and future growth
the city's street network
Action: Use Small Area and Circulation plans to encourage
dense development around station areas
47
KEY MOVE 5
Healing the East-West Divide
in Westside neighborhoods.
5.1 Develop a community-driven east–west transportation strategy
addresses immediate needs and inspires bold action
5.2 Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway
5.3 Reclaim spaces to serve community and function
5.4 Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods
KEY MOVE 6
Low-Emissions Mobility Options
Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals
6.1 Build awareness and use of transportation options
Action: Hire a transportation options program manager to enhance
Action: Expand student and education pass programs
Action: Implement a transportation wallet
Action: Incentivize developers to incorporate transportation demand
6.2 Manage existing parking supply
Action: Consolidate parking functions under a new parking program
Action: Understand parking utilization and performance
Action: Optimize a single mobile parking application
Action: Create an updated parking brand and communications plan
Action: Pilot a park-once-and-walk district in Downtown SLC
Action: Implement a project to pilot innovative and shared curb uses
Action: Develop Curb Management GuidelinesAction: Develop Curb Management Guidelines
Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan48
Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting
Action: Elevate voices of communities on the Westside and those most
impacted by transportation infrastructure
Action: Center human safety, health, and experience
Action: Craft a community-centric East-West Transportation Strategy that
and railroad tracks
Action: Develop fast implementation projects that stitch the east-west divide
Action: Develop bold concepts to repair and build community
Action: Improve transportation options that support safe, affordable
east-west travel
at a human scale
Action: Create a program to bring life and community identity to "below
the freeway" spaces
Action: Foster local and grassroots efforts to envision remedies and uses
for "in between" spaces
Action: Rethink freeway ramps
where prosperity is shared
Action: Develop complete, inclusive, transit-oriented neighborhoods
Action: Use grade and elevation to create great experiences
and efficiently manage our streets .
employer outreach
management (TDM) into the development process
6.3 Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand
Action: Prioritize clear and consistent wayfinding and signage
6.4 Develop a curb management strategy
Action: Conduct a survey for existing curb uses across Salt Lake City
KEY MOVE 7
Places for People
KEY MOVE 8
Operationalize Complete Streets
Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets
8.1 Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design
8.2 Develop tools to guide decision-making
assessments
8.3 Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development
Leverage community benefits from private investment
to create welcoming community gathering places.
7.1 Leverage private investment in high growth areas
Action: Create public realm action plans
Action: lncentivize developers to implement adopted street concept plans
Action: Establish a green street network
7.2 Promote connectivity at the block level to create
walkable districts
Action: Value street and alley vacations
Action: Require mid block pathways
through effective partnership.
and management
Action: Integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle
Action: Structure project development teams to ensure accountability
Action: Establish a Complete Streets Steering Committee
Action: Update the Quality Transportation Improvement Program screening
tool to align with Connect SLC
Action: Develop data-driven storytelling tools to support Complete Streets
Action: Align capital projects with policies and best practice
Action: Formalize use of the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide
in project development
Action: Require compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies
Design Guide in the Complete Streets assessment
49
ATTACHMENT 2
Citywide Transportation Plan Metrics by Key Move Policies
Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Engagement
- Dollars paid to community-based organizations and community members.
- Comparison of demographic data for survey and in-person outreach events compared to city-wide
demographics.
- Geographical distribution of in-person events and survey responses.
Key Move 2: Zero Traffic Deaths
- Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-
injury locations).
- Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using
personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc.).
- Change in prevailing vehicle speeds on key corridors representing each of the City’s street
typologies.
Key Move 3: Great Networks for Active Mobility
- Change in walking and bicycling mode share.
- Number of new or enhanced pedestrian crossings.
- Change in access to all-ages-and-abilities bicycle facilities (e.g., population within ¼ mile).
Key Move 4: Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods
- Change in transit mode share.
- Number of TSP and bus lane treatments installed per year.
- Change in travel time for commuters traveling into SLC.
- Percentage of stops in SLC upgraded with amenities.
- Transit rider satisfaction survey results.
Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide
- Travel time reliability east to west compared to north to south.
- Number of safe, protected crossings for all modes between 2100 S and 600 N.
- Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-
injury locations such as in the Westside neighborhoods).
- Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using
personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc).
- Percent of income spent on transportation (Housing + Transportation Index).
Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options
- Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).
- Percentage of curb space not allocated for parking.
- Percentage of parking revenue invested in mobility options.
- Parking performance (occupancy, turnover, violations).
- Awareness of transportation options programs via biennial citywide transportation surveys.
Key Move 7: Places for People
- Number of uninterrupted blocks (without midblock crossings) in the city.
- Creation of and progress on Green Streets.
Key Move 8: Operationalize Complete Streets
- Track compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide, particularly the
number of deviations granted.
- Track Complete Streets elements added to projects as a result of the interdepartmental process.
- Provide a public facing dashboard where finalized Complete Streets assessments can be viewed.
PROCESS RECAP
•Public Engagement Driven
•Values Based
•Not a List of Infrastructure Projects
•A 20 Year Vision for Transportation
in SLC
WHAT’S IN IT
•Vision
•Getting Around SLC
•Community Engagement
•Values
•Key Moves
•Achieving the Vision
VISION
It is our plan, envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where
everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices.
Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and safety, expand access to
opportunities, and improve air quality. Connect SLC identifies how we move
today, what we value, how we want to improve public spaces, and what
improvements would make it easier for us to move around Salt Lake City
(SLC). Through our transportation programs, policies, and investments, we
can directly influence the quality of life for people who live in, work in, and
visit our city.
Getting Around SLC
•What is Happening on our Roadways Today
•Safety
•Mode Split
•Trends and Challenges
Community Engagement
•Community Advisory Council
•Phase 1: Values
•Phase 2: Big Ideas
VALUES
•Equity
•Health and Safety
•Reliable Options
•Affordability
•Sustainability
KEY MOVES: Authentic and Intentional Engagement
Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices at the
planning table.
•Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices
•Redefine engagement and an opportunity for co-creation
•Facilitate long-term ongoing dialogue between the City and local
communities
KEY MOVES: Zero Traffic Deaths
Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all.
•Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan
•Create Safer Streets
KEY MOVES: Great Networks for Active Mobility
Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health
outcomes.
•Improve Pedestrian Safety and Connectivity
•Expand Low-Stress Bicycling Networks and Micromobility Options
•Create Active Spaces
KEY MOVES: Transit Friendly Neighborhoods
Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City.
•Make Transit Convenient and Reliable
•Nurture Inclusive and Welcoming Transit Spaces
•Enhance the Urban Context to Make Transit an Attractive Option
KEY MOVES: Healing the East-West Divide
Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside
neighborhoods.
•Develop a Community Driven East-West Transportation Strategy
•Provide Safe and Reliable Connections Across the Freeway and Tracks
•Reclaim Spaces to Serve Community and Function at a Human Scale
•Develop Equitable Connected Neighborhoods where Prosperity is Shared
KEY MOVES: Low Emissions Mobility Options
Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our
streets.
•Build Awareness and Use of Transportation Options
•Manage Existing Parking Supply
•Communicate and Unified Parking Strategy and Plan
•Develop a Curb Management Strategy
KEY MOVES: Places for People
Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community
gathering places.
•Leverage Private Investment in High Growth Areas
•Promote Connectivity at the Block Level to Create Walkable Districts
KEY MOVES: Operationalize Complete Streets
Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership.
•Develop Shared Goals and Accountability for Complete Streets Design and
Management
•Develop Tools to Guide Decision Making
•Use Street Typologies to Guide Complete Streets Development
THANK YOU!
joe.taylor@slcgov.com
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/tmp/
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________Date Received: _________________
, Chief Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT:Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC
STAFF CONTACT:Joe Taylor, Transportation Planner IV, Joe.taylor@slcgov.com, or
(801) 535-6679
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC
BUDGET IMPACT:None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:The Administration has developed the Citywide
Transportation Plan: Connect SLC (the Plan) to replace the existing Transportation Master Plan.
The Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan, while a remarkable and progressive document
for its time, was adopted in 1996. Much has changed since that time, including transportation
planning practices and the zeitgeist of how we think about public rights-of-way. Mobility of
goods and services is still of necessity, but it shares space with notions of safety, accessibility,
and concerns for the environment.
The policy landscape within Salt Lake City has also changed dramatically since the mid-1990s.
Plan Salt Lake (2015) laid out the City’s vision, aiming to prepare our city for growth while
simultaneously focusing on sustainability and livability. At the root of the vision is quality of life
for current and future generations. Specifically, in the realm of transportation, Salt Lake City has
adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2015) and a Transit Master Plan (2017). These
plans provide a list of projects that the City hopes to accomplish to bring transit and active
transportation into parity with our current autocentric landscape.
In this context, Connect SLC (formally the Transportation Master Plan) aims to take the values
espoused by the former plans, as well as those we heard from the community during
development of the Plan update, and to imbue all transportation projects, initiatives, and day-to-
day operations with those values. Much like Plan Salt Lake, Connect SLC is intended to function
as a Citywide plan that brings consistency not only to the Transportation Division’s work, but
also to the City as a whole, recognizing that many divisions and departments of the City touch
our transportation system in some way. According to the vision of Connect SLC “It is our plan,
envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where everyone enjoys equitable,
affordable, and reliable transportation choices. Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and
safety, expand access to opportunities, and improve air quality.”
KEY MOVES:The Plan lays out eight key moves to advance these values in our transportation
network:
1. Authentic and Intentional Engagement
Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices
at the planning table.
2. Zero Traffic Deaths
Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all.
3. Great Networks for Active Mobility
Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health
outcomes.
4. Transit Friendly Neighborhoods
Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City.
5. Healing the East-West Divide
Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside
neighborhoods.
6. Low Emission Mobility Options
Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage
our streets.
7. Places for People
Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming
community gathering places.
8. Operationalize Complete Streets
Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership.
PUBLIC PROCESS: Engagement began with the creation of a Community Advisory Council
(CAC). Through a formal application process, we identified nine individuals who would be
compensated hourly for their work on the project. The CAC gave ideas directly, helping shape
the broader community engagement plan. They also participated in events, edited documents
(including the final draft of the Plan), and perhaps most importantly, gave us access to their own
networks. With the help of the CAC, we launched a public engagement effort that asked the
community what they value most in their transportation system. Results from an online survey
and in-person events conducted at pop-up vaccine clinics were weighted to reflect city
demographics, in this case, adjusting for a lack of people 18 and under.
Individuals who live, work, and/or go to school in Salt Lake City identified safety from harm,
affordability, reliability, equity, and sustainability as their top transportation values. The project
team then took these values and created a large menu of policy options to address them. The
policy areas that received the most public support formed the basis of the second round of
engagement, detailed below.
A total of 879 (15 in Spanish, 864 in English) people responded to the City’s online survey and
approximately 60 people participated through in-person outreach. While demographic
information was not consistently collected for in-person participants, these events focused on
reaching communities who were under-represented in online survey responses, particularly
people who live in Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods. The full report for the first round
of engagement, including geographic and demographic analysis of the respondents, is included in
Exhibit 4 of this document.
The second round of engagement took the values identified in the first round and created a menu
of policy options that could potentially advance those values. These policy options were
explained with both written explanations and visual representations. Participants could vote
online for the concepts that best addressed their desires and concerns. Participants were also able
to plot points on a map of the city and identify problems or highlight things that worked well.
This process was also conducted at several in-person events where participants could use stickers
and post-it notes to vote on the concepts. In-person engagement took place at the following
locations:
Three Creeks Park Dedication
Northwest Recreation Center (timed to coincide with a soccer tournament)
Living Traditions Festival
West High School
Gail Miller Resource Center
Spy Hop Block Party
University Neighborhood Partners/Partners in the Park
Salt Lake City Homeless Resource Fair (Madsen Park)
Since individuals could vote multiple times and demographic information was not collected, the
exact number of individuals responding to the second round of engagement was not collected.
However, we received thousands of responses during this round. We had a native Spanish
speaker present to help with engagement at some of these events, and the results were significant
enough to be highlighted in Key Move 1 of Connect SLC.
After the second round of engagement, staff took two additional internal engagement steps.
First, in order to address City representation, we presented the project to the Planning
Commission and the City Council for the first time. Recommendations from these entities
included focus on the following areas: safety, integration with land use policy, and continued
effort toward complete street programs for critical east-west corridors These comments were
integrated into the plan, specifically in Key Moves 2, 5, 7 and 8.
Second, the work was presented to a meeting of City department directors. This work session
allowed other departments and divisions to voice any concerns and create space for suggestions
on how the Plan could better integrate with other City efforts across departments.
The draft plan was presented to the Planning Commission on November 8, 2023. The
Commission unanimously recommended adoption by the City Council with the following text
amendment:
“Section 1.3 be amended to read, Strategy 1.3 facilitates long term dialogue between the City,
the local community, and other reginal partners. For Strategy 2.1 to establish a vision zero
action plan, to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and awareness
about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City.”
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access)
b)PC Minutes of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access)
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan
2)1996 Transportation Master Plan (Currently Adopted)
3) Draft Citywide Transportation Plan – Connect SLC
4)Survey Report (First round of public engagement)
5)2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (Adopted)
6)2017 Transit Master Plan (Adopted)
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
NO. ___ OF 2024
(Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a, the Municipal Land Use,
Development, and Management Act (the “Act”), on December 7, 2015, the Salt Lake City
Council (“City Council”) passed Ordinance No. 63 of 2015 to adopt Plan Salt Lake as a general
plan; and
WHEREAS, as part of Salt Lake City Corporation’s (“City”) general plan, on July 19,
1996, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 19 of 1996 adopting the Transportation Master
Plan of 1996 (the “1996 Transportation Masterplan”) as a guiding document for transportation
policy; and
WHEREAS, since its adoption, significant changes in the state of transportation policy
and practice, as well as concerns regarding safety, sustainability, mobility preferences, and
equity considerations have rendered the adopted 1996 Transportation Master Plan valuable but
obsolete; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on
November 8, 2023 to consider recommending adoption of Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide
Transportation Plan (the “2023 Transportation Plan”), as required by the Act; and
WHEREAS, at its November 8, 2023 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
voted unanimously in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council to
adopt the 2023 Transportation Plan as provided in Exhibit "A” attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has
determined that the adoption of this ordinance is in the City’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
1. Adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan. That Connect
SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is
hereby adopted to replace the 1996 Transportation Masterplan as part of City’s
general plan, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a.
2. Jurisdiction. That Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan shall
apply within the City’s municipal boundaries to their full extent.
3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been
published in accordance with Utah Code 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance
with Utah Code 10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of
___________________, 2024.
.2
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________________
Victoria Petro, Chair
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
MAYOR
___________________________
CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM
(SEAL)Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: __________________________
Bill No. ________ of 2024
Published: ______________. _______________________________
Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney
March 6, 2024
___________________________
:_____________________
Montoya,Senior City Attor
March 6,2024
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Enforcement on Work Without a Certificate of Appropriateness
PLNPCM2023-00336
MOTION 1 (close and defer)
I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting.
MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight))
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance.
(Optional additional motion)
I further move that the Council include a requirement in the ordinance that any certificate of appropriateness be
physically posted on the site during the period of construction after the applicable building or demolition permit
is obtained.
MOTION 3 (continue hearing)
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Enforcement on Work Without a Certificate of Appropriateness
PLNPCM2023-00336
BRIEFING UPDATE
Planning staff briefed the Council on changes to the City code the Administrating is proposing for work
done without a certificate of appropriateness (COA). It would address unlawful construction and
demolition activities in the Historic Preservation Zoning District Overlay to protect historic resources in
local historic districts and local landmark sites citywide. Work on the proposed text amendment began
several months ago and was not initiated by any single event.
Council Members discussed the importance of preserving historic structures and the increased risk of
losing them given pressures associated with growth in the city. A Council Member noted owners of historic
buildings are stewards of the structures and responsible for their maintenance during the time they own
them giving future generations an opportunity to enjoy these buildings and have a chance at stewardship.
The Council expressed a desire for the financial penalty of illegally demolishing a historic structure to be
significant enough to dissuade someone from doing so and not have fees and fines low enough to be
considered a “cost of doing business.” There was also a discussion of a potentially higher level of scrutiny
for landmark sites, which are seen as buildings that have an even greater value. Planning is working on
additional information and will provide it to the Council when it is ready.
Under the proposal, a contributing building that is demolished without a COA would require
reconstruction. The property owner would be required to enter a restrictive covenant with the City
prohibiting demolition and major alterations to the reconstructed building for 25 years and the restrictive
covenant would transfer to any future property owner during that period. Planning found that
Item Schedule:
Briefing: April 2, 2024
Set Date: April 2, 2024
Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
Potential Action: May 7, 2024
Page | 2
development potential of property is sometimes viewed as more valuable than buildings on the property.
Restricting development on a site is seen as a more effective deterrent than fines.
Planning staff is working on a separate text amendment with fees that relate to the current enforcement
without a certificate of appropriateness proposal. This proposed text amendment will come to the Council
in the coming weeks. Some of the proposed fees include:
work without a certificate of appropriateness for full or partial demolition of contributing structure
or landmark site: $250/day (new)
Increased boarded building fee outside H overlay: $14,000 (currently $1,560)
Enhanced fee for boarded contributing structures: $14,850 (new)
o It is worth noting that only one of the boarded building fees would be charged.
Stop work order: $230/day (new)
Increase general fines for violations to $50-$200/day.
Following the briefing, a Council Member asked about requiring demolition permits to be posted on sites
where demolition is happening. The Administration said International Commercial, and Residential
Building Codes, which are included in State code, require permits to be kept at the work site. The
International Code Council oversees these building codes and provided commentary saying permits must
be displayed at work sites, but these comments are not included in the adopted International Building
Codes. The City’s building code follows State code which requires permits onsite but does not require them
to be posted.
If the City building code is changed to be more restrictive than State code, the State Building Code
Commission generally needs to grant permission. There is a process for this which takes several months
and may or may not be approved.
In addition, Council Members asked the following questions during the briefing. As of the publishing of
this staff report the Administration’s responses are not yet available, but we will forward them to the
Council as soon as they are.
Can the City prohibit a developer who demolishes a historic building without a certificate of
appropriateness from doing business in the city for one year (or another timeframe)?
Can the City assess a vacant property fine for buildings demolished without a certificate of
appropriateness?
What is the feasibility of assessing some number of historic buildings in the city each year (number
TBD) and creating a report describing building condition. This would help identify buildings that
are allowed to deteriorate to the point of being economically unfeasible to preserve.
Can the fee for full or partial demolition of a contributing building be either the proposed $250/day
or tied to a percentage of the property’s assessed value, whichever is greater?
POLICY QUESTION
1. The Council may wish to discuss changing City code by adding a requirement to display demolition
permits on work sites. This would follow the State Building Code Commission process discussed
above.
Summary of Planning Division Follow-up Memo to the
Enforcement on Work Without a Certificate of Appropriateness
A separate building code administration and enforcement transmittal is coming to the
Council soon that includes enforcement provisions related to the current work without a
certificate of appropriateness item.
o Changes will be included in both ordinances so there is continuity.
o The building code administration and enforcement transmittal has also been in the
works for some time and is not the result of any specific event.
The Administration proposes a fine of $250/day for full or partial demolition of a
contributing structure, and $500/day for full or partial demolition of a landmark site without
a certificate of appropriateness.
The Council asked about a penalty proportional to property value.
o The Administration believes this could be found arbitrary and capricious. Property
value is not always consistent with its historical value.
The Council asked about a penalty for vacant property.
o The Attorney’s Office said this may conflict with state law principle that property
owners have a right to exclude others.
The Council asked about conducting annual assessments of a portion of landmark sites in the
city.
o The Administration found the following constraints:
Staff resources,
Owner permission to inspect sites,
City’s lack of ability to require deficiencies to be corrected (unless deficiency
is a health or safety issue).
Property owner outreach. To ensure that owners of property in a local historic district are
informed of the regulations in the historic preservation overlay, Planning staff does the
following:
o Annual postcards are mailed to property owners notifying them of the overlay
designation.
The notice includes links to Planning’s website preservation section with
information on standards, guidelines, and resources for maintaining historic
properties.
o Planning intends to extend the notifications to owners of landmark sites.
o Planning has an email address dedicated to addressing inquiries about historic
structures.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
City Council Briefing –April 2, 2024
PLNPCM2023-00336
TEXT AMENDMENT –
ENFORCEMENT ON
WORK WITHOUT COA
Salt Lake City //Planning Division
•City initiated
•Addresses unlawful
construction and
demolition activities
•Impacts properties subject
to the H Historic
Preservation Overlay
District citywide
OVERVIEW
Local Historic Districts
Local Landmark Sites
Salt Lake City //Planning Division
The loss of a historic resource is
irreversible
Development pressure
Zoning enforcement
OBJECTIVE:
•Prevent and counter violations
BACKGROUND/ISSUE
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
PROPOSED CHANGES
1.Adds enforcement subsection within
the H Overlay
2.Limits redevelopment
3.Establishes a reconstruction process
4.Addresses violations & historic
status determinations
5.Clarifies eligibility for Economic
Hardship
6.Changes to related sections
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
RELATED PROPOSED CHANGES
Work without COA for full or
partial demolition of a
contributing structure or
landmark site: $250/day (new)
Increase boarded building:
$14,000 ($1,560)
Enhanced fee for boarded
contributing structures: $14,850
(new).
Stop work order: $250/day (new)
Increase general fines for
violations to $50-$200/day
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
4. Feedback from
HLC and PC
1. Enforcement
Limitations
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
2. Additional
Tools
3. City Goals &
Policies
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
1. ENFORCEMENT LIMITATIONS
1.STOP WORK
ORDER
2.FINES
3.CERTIFICATE OF
NONCOMPLIANCE
1.STOP WORK
ORDER
2.FINES
3.CERTIFICATE OF
NONCOMPLIANCE
SOLUTIONCONTEXTPROBLEMTOOLS
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
•Restrict future redevelopment
•Prevent greater development potential
•Additional costs
•Unfavorable outcome
2. ADDITIONAL TOOLS
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
•Wider Range of Preservation
Tools
•Enforcement of Regulation and
Approvals
•Ensure Preservation Regulations
are Enforced
•Guiding Principle: Preservation
3. CITY GOALS & POLICIES
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
4. FEEDBACK FROM HLC AND PC
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
PUBLIC PROCESS
Notices Briefings Hearings
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONS
PC RECOMMENDATION
Forward a positive recommendation to City Council
HLC RECOMMENDATION
Forward a positive recommendation to City Council with considerations:
•Increase the 25 year to 50 years
•Explore a fee charge for vacant property
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Mayara Lima //
Planning Manager-Zoning
Administrator
mayara.lima@slcgov.com
Amy Thompson //
Planning Manager
amy.thompson@slcgov.com
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS
MEMORANDUM
To: Salt Lake City Council
From: Mayara Lima, Planning Manager/Zoning Administrator
Date: April 12, 2024
Re: Follow-up to Council Briefing on a Text Amendment for Enforcement on Work Done
Without a Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA).
On April 2, 2024, the City Council held a briefing regarding a text amendment for Enforcement on
Work Done Without a CoA (PLNPCM2023-00336). During the briefing, the City Council asked staff
to further research some aspects of the proposal. This memo includes the staff’s response to those
items:
Proposed penalty
A separate petition (PLNPM2023-00868, Building Code Administration and Enforcement) has been
transmitted to council. The petition contains related enforcement provisions. The changes proposed
to 21A.20, as it relates to fines for work without a CoA, will be transferred to this petition and
included as part of the enforcement for work without a CoA text amendment. This update has been
reflected in the ordinance.
Council also inquired about the penalty for demolition of a contributing structure or landmark site
without a certificate of appropriateness proposed as $250. This is a new fee that does not currently
exist in our code. The figure was assessed as compared to what is proposed for other code violations:
Penalty per day by type of violation
Residential
zoning
General
work
without
COA
Housing
code
General
building
Commercial
zoning
Violation
of stop
word order
Demolition
without COA
$25-$50 $50 $50-$200 $100 $100-$200 $250 $250
A demolition without a COA of a contributing building or a landmark site is similar in gravity to a
violation of a stop work order and thus, is held to higher standards. Some cities in the country impose
a one-time fine, ranging from $1,000 to $10,000. Our proposed fine, which accumulates daily, is
proportional to the violation and comparable to what is done in other cities because of the time it
would take for a property owner to resolve the violation.
The reconstruction process would be lengthy, and a property owner would accumulate daily fines
until the reconstruction is approved. In addition to the fines, the owner would incur costs to obtain
the required documentation. After that, redevelopment of the property will continue to be restricted
for 25 years. Considering the entire process, the penalty is proportionate to the violation.
Page 2
Additionally, we recommend starting within a range of other penalties and potentially increasing it
later since this is the first instance of such a fine in Salt Lake City.
• Increased penalty for demolition of a landmark site:
Council suggested that landmark sites be held to even higher standards. The ordinance has
been updated to reflect an increase for demolition of landmark site to $500 per day, which is
double that of a demolition of a contributing building.
• Penalty based on property value:
Council asked to consider a penalty that is proportional to the property value of the
demolished structure. This solution is problematic because it could be found arbitrary and
capricious. A property value is not always consistent with its historical value. For example, a
building that has not been maintained or is physically small could have a lower property
value than its value to the city in terms of historic preservation. Additionally, the value could
easily fall outside the penalty threshold permitted by state code (Class B misdemeanor,
$1,000 maximum).
• Penalty for vacant property:
The Attorney’s Office indicated that this solution may conflict with state law. Utah law
recognizes the common law principle that property owners have a right to exclude others. As
a general proposition, penalizing that choice (i.e. by imposing fines for leaving a property
vacant) is likely to conflict with that right.
Landmark Site Assessment
A suggestion was made to conduct annual assessments of locally designated landmark sites. There
are constraints with doing these assessments, including staff resources, owner’s permission to inspect
and lack of city’s ability to require that deficiencies be corrected. From a historic perspective, the
zoning ordinance only regulates the exterior of landmark sites. Staff cannot legally conduct an
inspection of a landmark property without permission from the property owner. If permission is
granted and staff finds a deficiency with the exterior of the building, the City cannot require the
property owner to obtain the necessary approvals and conduct the work, unless the deficiency is a
health or safety violation. At best, a visual inspection of the exterior could be conducted for
documentation purposes. This could also have an impact on the division’s budget and resource
allocation.
Property Owner Outreach
The Planning Division is dedicated to ensuring property owners are informed about they live in a
local historic district and the corresponding regulations outlined in the H Historic Preservation
Overlay. To achieve this, we employ several outreach strategies. Firstly, a notice is recorded on the
property, accessible through any title search, to highlight its inclusion in a historic district. Moreover,
annual postcards are mailed out to notify property owners of their designation, accompanied by links
to the Preservation section of the Planning Department's website. This online resource hub offers
comprehensive information on standards, guidelines, and available resources for maintaining
historic properties. Looking ahead, we plan to extend this notification process to owners of
Landmark Sites. Furthermore, we operate a dedicated preservation email staffed by knowledgeable
planners who are equipped to address inquiries and offer technical assistance concerning historic
Page 3
structures. Through these concerted efforts, we aim to foster a proactive and informed approach to
historic preservation within our city.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/AnnualHUDGrants
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Annual U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Grant Funding Allocations 2024-2025:
Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG),
HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME),
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA),
One-time HOME-American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARPA), and
One-time Recaptured CDBG-Covid (CDBG-CV)
MOTION 1 – ADOPT
I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan funding
allocations attached to the motion sheet as Exhibit A for the following grant programs: CDBG, ESG,
HOME, HOPWA, HOME-ARPA, and CDBG-CV.
Staff note: HUD has not announced the final actual funding amounts that the City will receive for
CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA. Page 21 of the Exhibit A funding log shows contingencies for how to
adjust individual grant awards to applicants depending on whether the available funding is more or
less than estimated.
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
Item C1
Estimated 2024-2025 Funding Available: 5,197,763$
Category Maximum Allocated Balance
2024-2025 Admin (20%):879,552$ 679,552$ 200,000$
2024-2025 Public Services (15%):659,664$ 659,664$ -$
2024-2025 Housing & Neighborhood Improvements:3,858,547$ 3,858,547$ -$
1 FY23-24 679,552$ REQUEST:679,552$
FY22-23 710,934$ CDCIP:679,552$
FY21-22 701,832$ MAYOR:679,552$
FY20-21 701,833$ COUNCIL:679,552$
FY19-20 686,791$
5 YR TOTAL 3,480,942$
REQUEST:679,552$
CDCIP:679,552$
MAYOR:679,552$
COUNCIL:679,552$
1 Alliance House Inc.REQUEST:300,000$
CDCIP:221,000$
MAYOR:221,000$
COUNCIL:221,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
2 ASSIST, Inc. FY23-24 926,766$ REQUEST:950,000$
FY22-23 700,000$ CDCIP:747,547$
FY21-22 700,000$ MAYOR:747,547$
FY20-21 391,373$ COUNCIL:747,547$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 391,000$
5 YR TOTAL 3,109,139$
3 First Step House FY23-24 379,703$ REQUEST:302,000$
Recovery Residence Rehabilitation FY22-23 322,000$ CDCIP:290,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:290,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:290,000$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 701,703$
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/25
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
HOUSING
FUNDING CAPS AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL REGULATION
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
15.5%
15.5%
15.5%
Funding for salaries and operational expenses to administer and monitor the
federal grants, and to conduct the community processes. Funding may be
utilized by:
Attorney's Office
Finance Department
Housing Stability Division
CITY ADMINISTRATION
Housing Stability Division / Finance /
Attorney's Office
Note: 20% ($879,552) is the maximum amount allowed CITY ADMINISTRATION
TOTAL
15.5%
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME#
80.00
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
The funds will be used to demolish and help rebuild 1805 S Main Street to be
a 16 deeply affordable and safe housing units
An application was also submitted to HOME-ARPA #1 for the same project.
This application is to demolish the existing nine unit structure and build a
new 16 unit housing structure. This applicant also applied for funding from
the RDA's affordable housing Notice of Funding Availability or NOFA.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 69.38
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
NEW
Funds for critical rehabilitation at 720 Valdez Dr. 411 N Grant St. and 379 N
redwood Rd.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 73.39
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
1805 S Main Street Rebuild
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Supporting salaries, operational, and rehabilitation activities including
plumbing, heating & electrical, radon testing/mitigation, roof repair,
accessibility ramps, and accessibility design projects, etc.Emergency Home Repair & Accessibility
and Community Design
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 1
4 FY23-24 462,389$ REQUEST:2,000,000$
FY22-23 300,000$ CDCIP:342,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:342,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:342,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 762,389$
5 Odyssey House Inc.REQUEST:80,000$
CDCIP:80,000$
MAYOR:80,000$
COUNCIL:80,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
6 REQUEST:240,000$
CDCIP:220,000$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:220,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
7 FY23-24 711,027$ REQUEST:850,000$
FY22-23 500,000$ CDCIP:671,000$
FY21-22 600,000$ MAYOR:671,000$
FY20-21 485,600$ COUNCIL:671,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 439,873$
5 YR TOTAL 2,736,500$
8 Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division FY23-24 406,253$ REQUEST:500,000$
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:-$
Shared Equity Program FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:220,000$
FY20-21 250,000$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 656,253$
9 Neighborworks of Salt Lake FY23-24 406,267$ REQUEST:400,000$
FY22-23 196,837$ CDCIP:358,000$
Home Rehabilitation & Improvement FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:358,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:358,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 603,104$
10 YWCA Utah REQUEST:225,000$
CDCIP:221,000$
MAYOR:221,000$
COUNCIL:221,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
REQUEST:5,847,000$
CDCIP:3,150,547$
MAYOR:3,150,547$
COUNCIL:3,150,547$
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Roof Replacement for YWCA Utah's
Transitional Housing Facility
HOUSING TOTAL
60.61%
112.5%
60.6%
60.6%
Providing Solar Energy and Green Rehab to
low to moderate income or LMI
Community Land Trust program. Provides low to moderate income
homebuyers the opportunity to purchase a home by removing the cost of the
land. The resident will purchase the home/land improvements. Salt Lake City
retains ownership of the land to ensure future affordability.
70.25
Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership
via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or
financing.
70.13Program to provide assistance to low to moderate-income (LMI) residents
through home rehabilitations and down payments
An application was also submitted to HOME #5 for the same purpose.Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 67.67
Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership
via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or
financing.
Funds will be used to replace YWCA Utah's Kathleen Robison Huntsman (KRH)
transiontal housing facility's roof
NEW 74.29
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
Home Repair Program
Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
74.86
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
69.50
Housing: Support programs that provide access to home ownership
via down payment assistance, and/or housing subsidy, and/or
financing.
69.13
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of aging
housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts and
diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
ICAST will implement solar PV with or without battery storage systems that
include key rehabilitative aspects in multi-unit housing
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
HOUSING
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
Lighthouse and Martindale Clinic Roof
Replacement
Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division
Fix the Bricks
International Center for Appropriate and
Sustainable Technology (ICAST)
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Funds will be used to provide the two connecting facilities with a new roof NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Funds will be used to provide seismic retrofits to low to moderate income or
LMI residential homes
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
NEW
Salaries and operational support for the Housing Rehabilitation and Target
Repair programs that provide home repair services that address health,
safety, and structural issues for low income homeowners.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 2
1 Salt Lake City - Housing Stability Division FY23-24 925,000$ REQUEST:885,000$
FY22-23 650,000$ CDCIP:708,000$
FY21-22 502,000$ MAYOR:708,000$
FY20-21 425,883$ COUNCIL:708,000$
FY19-20 319,642$
5 YR TOTAL 2,822,525$
2 REQUEST:280,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
REQUEST:1,165,000$
CDCIP:708,000$
MAYOR:708,000$
COUNCIL:708,000$
1 Advantage Services Inc REQUEST:85,000$
CDCIP:63,164$
MAYOR:63,164$
COUNCIL:63,164$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
2 Boys and Girls Club of SL REQUEST:116,153$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
3 Catholic Community Services of Utah REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
4 Catholic Community Services of Utah REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
81.46
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANREQUEST/RECOMMENDED
Behavioral Health and build Community
Resiliency Program
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME
Community Resiliency: Economic Development efforts via
supporting the improvement and visibility of small businesses
through façade improvement programs.
WeeCare, Inc. dba Upwards
Provide paid supportive employment to individuals who are experiencing
homelessness, formerly homeless, or staying at the Homeless Resource
Centers
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
Provide grant money to businesses for facade improvements, focusing on
small businesses and target areas.
PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDSPROJECT DESCRIPTION 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
PUBLIC SERVICES
13.6%
13.6%
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE TOTAL
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 69.83
22.4%
Boost Program / Business Operations &
Optimization Support & Tolls for Child Care
Providers
Neighborhood Business Improvement
Program (NBIP)
Funds will be used to expand ecnomnic opportunites for daycare providers in
SLC by training them to use essential tools to make their operations more
efficent and supporting hiring new LMJ's
An application was also submitted to CDBG-CV for the same program.
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 49.00
13.6%
Community Resiliency: Provide ecnomic development support for
microenterprise buisness
Funding would provide salary/benefits for a Chef Trainer, who provides
classroom and hands-on instruction regarding food safety, health codes,
understanding and using equipment, and the preparation of a full-range of
foods.
This application is for the same program but a different employee position
than the application immediately below.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Provisional Supportive Employment
Program
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
NEW
Provide Staff and operation costs for trauma-informed care and services that
support their mental and emotional health
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 71.67
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS: TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFASTRUCTURE - SEE ATTACHMENT 3 FOR TARGET AREA MAP
Chef Trainer at CCS Kitchen Academy
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs that reduce
food insecurity for vulnerable population.
80.46
Employment/Lifeskills Coordinator at CCS
Kitchen Academy
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs that reduce
food insecurity for vulnerable population.
Funding would provide salary/benefits for a Employment/Lifeskills
Coordinator, who provides classroom and hands-on instruction regarding
food safety, health codes, understanding and using equipment, and the
preparation of a full-range of foods.
This application is for the same program but a different employee position
than the application immediately above.
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 80.88
NEW
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 3
5 Children's Center Utah FY23-24 30,489$ REQUEST:110,000$
Therapeutic Preschool Program FY22-23 55,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 85,489$
6 Children's Media Workshop REQUEST:85,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
7 REQUEST:55,000$
CDCIP:-$
Housing Counseling MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
COUNCIL:-$
8 First Step House FY23-24 30,000$ REQUEST:50,000$
FY22-23 30,299$ CDCIP:33,000$
FY21-22 41,700$ MAYOR:33,000$
FY20-21 47,000$ COUNCIL:33,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 178,999$
9 First Step House FY23-24 30,000$ REQUEST:80,000$
FY22-23 30,000$ CDCIP:61,500$
FY21-22 48,000$ MAYOR:61,500$
FY20-21 50,000$ COUNCIL:61,500$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 38,806$
5 YR TOTAL 196,806$
10 Friends of Switchpoint, Inc REQUEST:238,286$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
11 Friends of Switchpoint, Inc REQUEST:238,286$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
PUBLIC SERVICES
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
72.75
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
71.38
Community Resiliency: Expand access to early childhood education
to set the stage for academic achievement, social development,
and change the cycle of poverty.
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
Salaries and administrative costs for Peer Support Services (PSS) Program
which provides peer-based supportive services, delivered by certified Peer
Support Specialists.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 83.13
Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing tools to
increase economic and/or housing stability.
NEW Community Development Corporation of
Utah
Travel/Well Schools
Transportation: Support access to transportation prioritizing very
low-income and vulnerable populations
This program provides treatment for preschool-aged children, who have been
the victims of assault or trauma, and who are struggling to succeed in
childcare or preschool. Follow up with intensive group therapy to gain
resilience and learn essential skills.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 78.75
Provide salary and direct operational costs for a housing/homeowner
counseling program
Provide operational costs for the Travel/Well program which provides
mapping and safety tools to increase safe pedestrian travel.
This is one of only two applications that advance the City's transportation
goal in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. There have been few transportation
applications during the five years.
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 50.67
Provide supportive employment services to high-risk, high-need individuals in
our community caught in the cycles of relapse, mental illness, incarceration,
homelessness, and unemployment.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 81.00
Funds will provide salary for case management for homeless seniors and
veterans aged 55+ located at Point at Airport
This application is for the same program but at a different location two block
away from the application immediately below.
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 72.88Airport Permanently Supportive Case
Management Program
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
Funds will provide salary for case management for homeless seniors and
veterans aged 55+ Located at Point at Fairpark
This application is for the same program but at a different location two block
away from the application immediately above.
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Fairpark Permanently Supportive Case
Management Program
Employment Preparation and Placement
(EPP) Program
Peer Support Services
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options, counseling support,
and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 4
12 International Rescue Committee FY23-24 30,489$ REQUEST:60,000$
FY22-23 40,000$ CDCIP:-$
FY21-22 54,400$ MAYOR:-$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 44,629$
5 YR TOTAL 169,518$
13 Legal Aid Society of Salt Lake FY23-24 30,000$ REQUEST:30,000$
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 30,000$
14 Odyssey House Inc.REQUEST:90,000$
CDCIP:47,000$
MAYOR:47,000$
COUNCIL:47,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
15 Odyssey House Inc.REQUEST:150,000$
CDCIP:85,000$
MAYOR:85,000$
COUNCIL:85,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
16 FY23-24 30,000$ REQUEST:30,000$
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:-$
Survivial Services of Refugees FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:-$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 30,000$
17 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services FY23-24 49,692$ REQUEST:55,000$
Community Dental Project FY22-23 42,500$ CDCIP:40,000$
FY21-22 44,400$ MAYOR:40,000$
FY20-21 44,000$ COUNCIL:40,000$
FY19-20 48,510$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL 229,102$
18 Shelter The Homeless FY23-24 -$ REQUEST:132,000$
FY22-23 30,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 30,000$
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 82.13House Bus Passes
Transitional Housing
Salt Lake American
GMRC & GEK Security
Salaries, supplies, and lab fees for Community Dental Project, to support
homeless and low-income individuals with dental services.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Homeless Services: Expand support for medical and dental care
options for those experiencing homelessness
Provide security within the Gail Miller Resource Center and/or GMRC &
Geraldine E. King or Resource Center. The applicant confirmed they are
unconcerned limiting the scope of these funds to only security. The original
request included security and food. CDBG Public Services #21 was submitted
by The Road Home for operational expenses at the GMRC. ESG Part 1 #3 was
submitted by Shelter the Homeless for operational expenses at the same
shelters. Also, ESG Part 1 #5 was submitted by VOA for operational expenses
at the GEK.
PUBLIC SERVICES
Provide bus passes to low to moderate income or LMI clients and clients in
their Harm Reduction Programming
This is one of only two applications that advance the City's transportation
goal in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. There have been few transportation
applications during the five years.
Funds will be used for the Domestic Violence Victim Assitance Program to
provide free legal representation to victims of domestic violence, regardless
of their income.
81.38
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
NEW
78.75
76.63
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Funds will facilitate Digital Inclusion staff to support refugee and other new
Americans access/learn digital technology skills, critical to improving their
economic and housing stability.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 69.25
Transportation: Support access to transportation prioritizing very
low-income and vulnerable populations
Provide financial assistance for low to moderate income or LMI clients to
move into transitional housing post in-patient treatment and while living in
transitional housing
An application was also submitted to HOME-ARPA #4 for the same purpose.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Housing: Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable
housing as a primary strategy to prevent and end homelessness
Language Interpretation Translation and Guidance,
Social Service Facilitators, Survival Resources and Services Facilitation of
Access to Survival Resources and Services to refugee community
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 69.13
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs that reduce
food insecurity for vulnerable population.
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs that reduce
food insecurity for vulnerable population
83.92
Digital Skills & Education Access to Build
Resiliency Refugees and New Americans
Community Resiliency: Promote digital inclusion through access to
digital communication technologies and the internet.
Domestic Violence Victim Assistance
Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing tools to
increase economic and/or housing stability.
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 5
19 South Valley Sanctuary FY23-24 30,489$ REQUEST:40,000$
FY22-23 40,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 100,000$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 30,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20
5 YR TOTAL 200,489$
20 The Inn Between FY23-24 50,776$ REQUEST:100,000$
End of Life Care and Medical Respite FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 45,599$
5 YR TOTAL 96,375$
21 The Road Home FY23-24 55,450$ REQUEST:101,048$ Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 72,000$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 127,450$
22 The Road Home FY23-24 50,000$ REQUEST:50,000$
Housing Staffing FY22-23 40,000$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 90,000$
23 United Way of Salt Lake REQUEST:45,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
24 Utah Legal Services REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
25 Wasatch Community Gardens FY23-24 30,489$ REQUEST:39,884$
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:-$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 30,489$
Domestic Violence Case Manager and
Housing Assistance
Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing
and supportive services.
Provides homeless individuals who need hospice or other end of life care and
temporary medical respite housing for homeless individuals experiencing a
medical crisis.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
PUBLIC SERVICES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Provide salary and benefits to the shelter director to work alongside victim
advocates and survivors to provide emergencty shelter and supportive
services
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 76.17
76.00
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Poverty Disrupter Project
Provide Salary and benefits and direct operational costs to the Poverty
Disrupter Project that is aimed to expand employment and finanicial stability
for low to moderate income or LMI residents
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 76.00
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
NEW
Behavioral Health: Support programs that provide connection to
permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs.
Support may include, but is not limited to supporting obtaining
housing via deposit and rent assistance and barrier elimination to
the extent allowable to regulation
Operational support for the Gail Miller Resource Center to help with
emergency shelter, clothing, access to showers, support with community
resources, and connection to community housing options.
CDBG Public Services #18 and ESG Part 1 #3 were submitted by Shelter the
Homeless for operational expenses at the same shelters.
78.38
The housing navigation staff work at four of the resource centers and
coordinate with other service providers to serve households referred into the
program.
Utah's Promise: Basic Needs for SLC
Residents
68.13Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
NEWProvide customer-centric referral connection services to SLC residents in
need that include warm transfers, follow-up services, and client satisfaction
surveys.
Homeless Resource Centers
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing
and supportive services.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 77.92
Homeless Services: Expand case management support as a way to
connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent housing
and supportive services.
Provides farm-based employment, work readiness training, job placement
assistance, and mentoring for women facing and/or experiencing
homelessness. Request for One-time expenses related to farm move
including partial soil removal and disposal, Geotextile layer, Importing clean
soil, and palletizing and moving supplies.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 72.42Green Team Program
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational training
programs targeting low-income and vulnerable populations.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 6
26 FY23-24 40,456$ REQUEST:97,144$
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:30,000$
Health and Housing Transtion Team FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 40,456$
27 YWCA Utah FY23-24 56,249$ REQUEST:218,990$
FY22-23 37,778$ CDCIP:-$
FY21-22 33,900$ MAYOR:-$
FY20-21 58,285$ COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
FY19-20 58,285$
5 YR TOTAL 244,497$
28 Ruff Haven Crisis Sheltering REQUEST:42,900$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
29 Neighborhood House Association REQUEST:87,387$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
PUBLIC SERVICES
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION
YWCA’s secure, emergency shelter offers 36 onsite and 4 overflow units to
victims left homeless due to domestic violence. Provide salary and benefits
for essential shelter staffing infrastructure.
There was an error where the program applied to the neighborhood
improvements category, but the proposed uses are ineligible under that
funding category. Housing Stability staff provided technical assistance to the
applicant to try and avoid the issue in the future. It should be noted that the
organization and the specific program have applied for and received funding
in the CDBG Public Services category for several years before.
INELIGIBLE Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 N/AEnhancing Early Childhood Education
Address social determinatnes of health including acces to health care and
housing stability.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 77.25
Community Resiliency: Expand Access to health care and housing
stability.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 74.54DV and Residential Services
Wasatch Homeless Health Care, Inc. dba
Fourth Street Clinic
Crisis Sheltering Services for Companion
Animals of Homeless Individuals and
Families
HUD provided guidance that this application is ineligible because as a
standalone service the primary beneficiary is the animal and not the intended
qualified population of individuals experienceing homelessness. If the service
was part of a larger holistic approach removing housing barriers, then a
better case could be made for eligibility.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 N/AINELIGIBLE
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless services including
Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency overflow
operations.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 7
REQUEST:2,577,078$
CDCIP:659,664$
MAYOR:659,664$
COUNCIL:659,664$
FUND REQUEST
Housing 5,847,000$
Neighborhood Improvements: Transp & ED 1,165,000$
Public Services 2,577,078$
Administration 679,552$
TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED:10,268,630$
CDCIP Board Recommendations:
Administration Analysis:
If an increase in funding:
5,197,763$ CDCIP:
Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation
If a decrease in funding:
Estimated Program Income:1,000,000$
Allocate 20% of the annual CDBG award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the
annual award and 15% of the estimated 2024-25 CDBG Program Income to Public Services.
Remove funding from the lowest scoring activities and then reduce additional applications
from lowest to highest scoring. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or
$10,000.
Note: 15% is the maximum amount allowed per HUD regulations
Allocate 20% of the annual CDBG award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the
annual award and 15% of the estimated 2024-25 CDBG Program Income to Public Services.
Add additional funding to the highest scoring applications up to 75% of the average board
recommended amount before moving to the next highest scoring application. As much as
practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000.
COUNCIL:
5,197,763$
-$ COUNCIL:
-$
15.0%
MAYOR:-$
Reallocated CDBG:
ESTIMATED 24-25 GRANT AWARD:
FUND AVAILABILITY
3,397,763$
15.0%PUBLIC SERVICES
TOTAL
CDCIP:
800,000$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:5,197,763$
FUNDS ALLOCATED
MAYOR:
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION
75.8%
15.0%
TOTALS
5,197,763$
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 8
180,000$ Max for Part 1:181,860$
100,368$
303,100$
1 Family Promise Salt Lake FY23-24 30,408$ REQUEST:51,881$
Community Family Shelter FY22-23 30,247$ CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL 60,655$
2 First Step House FY23-24 40,636$ REQUEST:60,000$
FY22-23 36,248$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 49,250$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 60,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY19-20 50,000$
5 YR TOTAL 236,134$
3 Shelter the Homeless REQUEST:229,169$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
4 Soap2Hope REQUEST:154,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 Volunteers of America, Utah FY23-24 30,408$ REQUEST:60,000$
FY22-23 65,048$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 30,000$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 38,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$
FY19-20 -$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
5 YR TOTAL 163,456$
6 Volunteers of America, Utah FY23-24 30,408$ REQUEST:100,000$
FY22-23 45,249$ CDCIP:30,000$
FY21-22 44,000$ MAYOR:30,000$
FY20-21 46,000$ COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY19-20 44,115$
5 YR TOTAL 209,772$
REQUEST:655,050$ 216.12%
CDCIP:180,000$ 59.39%Max 60%
MAYOR:180,000$ 59.39%Max 60%
COUNCIL:180,000$ 59.39%Max 60%
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 79.79
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 77.67Geraldine King Women's Resource Center
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Operational and essential services of the VOA Youth Resource Center,
which serves homeless and at risk teens age 15-22.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
The Funds would be used for the repair and maintenance of the facilities
Gerald E King (GEK) and Gail Miller Resource Center (GMRC). As well as
supporting the cost of utilities, insurance and the purchase of an
estimated 90 bed replacements. CDBG Public Services #18 was submitted
by Shelter the Homeless for operational expenses at the same shelters.
CDBG Public Services #21 was submitted by The Road Home for
operational expenses at the GMRC. ESG Part 1 #5 was submitted by VOA
for GEK operational expenses.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
SALT LAKE CITY ESG PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
Part 1 Funding: Street Outreach and Emergency Shelter:
Part 2 Funding: Homelessness Prevention, RRH, HMIS, and Admin:
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
2024-2025 Funding Available:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS#REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
First Step House will provide on-site behavioral health assessment,
referral, and peer support services to individuals at the Men's Homeless
Resource Center.
PART 1 - STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER
The FPSL family shelter program utilizes 12 Salt Lake Valley buildings to
shelter homeless families. Each shelter location houses 3-4 families at a
time for one week at a time.
Homeless Resource Center Program
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
83.25
79.00
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
78.25Shelter Operation GMRC &GEK
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
NEW
The funds will help provide services such as nightly outreach to provide
essential care and connect with case management, client referrals to
community health partners, prevention/education advocacy for harm
reduction, and transportation services such as the UTA bus fare program
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 74.13
Homeless Services: Homeless emergency shelter, resource
center, or overflow operations
Harm Reduction Street Outreach Program
*FUNDING FOR PART 1 CANNOT EXCEED $181,860
STREET OUTREACH AND EMERGENCY SHELTER TOTAL
Operational and service expenses for the Geraldine E. King Women's
Resource Center.
CDBG Public Services #18 and ESG Part 1 #3 were submitted by Shelter
the Homeless for operational expenses at the same shelters.
Homeless Youth Resource Center
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 9
1 REQUEST:40,000$
CDCIP:33,000$
MAYOR:33,000$
COUNCIL:33,000$ Consolidated Plan Objective:
2 REQUEST:152,938$ Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
CDCIP:34,368$
Rapid ReHousing (RRH)MAYOR:34,368$
COUNCIL:34,368$ Consolidated Plan Objective:Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
3 The Road Home FY23-24 34,337$ REQUEST:91,888$
FY22-23 51,816$ CDCIP:33,000$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:33,000$
FY20-21 40,765$ COUNCIL:33,000$ Consolidated Plan Objective:
FY19-20 84,077$
5 YR TOTAL 210,995$
REQUEST:284,826$
CDCIP:100,368$
MAYOR:100,368$
COUNCIL:100,368$
1 Salt Lake City Corporation FY23-24 22,732$ REQUEST:22,732$
FY22-23 22,510$ CDCIP:22,732$
FY21-22 22,630$ MAYOR:22,732$
FY20-21 22,446$ COUNCIL:22,732$
FY19-20 21,843$
5 YR TOTAL 112,161$
REQUEST:962,608$
CDCIP:303,100$
MAYOR:303,100$
COUNCIL:303,100$
962,608$
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
ESTIMATED 24-25 GRANT AWARD:303,100$ CDCIP BOARD:303,100$ -$
REALLOCATION:-$ MAYOR:303,100$ -$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 303,100 COUNCIL:303,100$ -$
CDCIP Board Recommendation:Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation
If an increase in funding If a decrease
in funding
7.5%
7.5%To provide management, oversight, and monitoring of the ESG program.
Administration: 7.5% of ESG allocation.
HOMELESS PREVENTION & RAPID REHOUSING & HMIS TOTAL
Program Administration
PART 2 - HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, AND HMIS
UCA will staff case workers who receive clients from their intake system,
assess each client, and provide a case management
Family Promise Salt Lake Funds will help provide rental assistance to families facing homelessness,
security and utility deposits, utility payments, rental application fees, and
case management
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 77.75
Prevention and RRH Services
Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization
assistance
Allocate 7.5% of the annual ESG award to program administration. Remove
funding from the lowest scoring activities and then reduce additional
applications from lowest to highest scoring. As much as practicable, round to
the nearest $1,000.
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Allocate 7.5% of the annual ESG award to program administration. Do not exeed the 60%
Part 1 funding cap. Add additional funding to the highest scoring applications up to 75%
of the average board recommended amount before moving to the next highest scoring
application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000.
NEW
NEWSalt Lake Community Action dba Utah
Community Action 81.50
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:FUNDS ALLOCATED:
Requested Funds
ADMINISTRATION
Rapid Re-Housing Program
Salary support for case managers in The Road Home’s Rapid Re-housing
Program working with participants, combined with short-term rental
assistance.
HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION, RAPID RE-HOUSING, HMIS, AND ADMINISTRATION
79.38
Housing Programs: Rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing stabilization
assistance
7.5%
7.5%
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 10
Estimated 2024-2025 Funding Available:-$
1 FY23-24 213,950$ REQUEST:374,800$
FY22-23 200,000$ CDCIP:-$
Down Payment Assistance FY21-22 200,000$ MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 200,000$ COUNCIL:-$
FY19-20 200,000$
5 YR TOTAL 1,013,950$
2 REQUEST:500,000$
CDCIP:500,000$
Recovery Housing Program MAYOR:500,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:500,000$
3 REQUEST:2,000,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
New City Plaza Apartments COUNCIL:-$
4 REQUEST:600,000$
CDCIP:464,305$
Affordable Home Ownership MAYOR:464,305$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:464,305$
5 FY23-24 -$ REQUEST:420,000$
FY22-23 208,661$ CDCIP:-$
Down Payment Assistance FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:-$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 208,661$
6 FY23-24 138,431$ REQUEST:178,431$
FY22-23 138,500$ CDCIP:178,431$
DV Survivor Housing Assistance FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:178,431$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:178,431$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 276,931$
7 FY23-24 349,839$ REQUEST:350,000$
FY22-23 200,000$ CDCIP:350,000$
TBRA program FY21-22 200,000$ MAYOR:350,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 200,000$ COUNCIL:350,000$
FY19-20 200,000$
5 YR TOTAL 1,149,839$
8 FY23-24 208,757$ REQUEST:233,142$
FY22-23 167,669$ CDCIP:233,142$
TBRA program FY21-22 167,669$ MAYOR:233,142$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 70,000$ COUNCIL:233,142$
FY19-20 70,000$
5 YR TOTAL 684,095$
Utah Community Action 79.29
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 73.00
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of
aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts
and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
82.14
75.29
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide access
to home ownership via down payment assistance and/or
housing subsidy and/or financing.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
71.86
69.86
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide access
to home ownership via down payment assistance and/or
housing subsidy and/or financing.
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide access
to home ownership via down payment assistance and/or
housing subsidy and/or financing.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
81.86
Housing: Support housing programs that address needs of
aging housing stock through targeting rehabilitation efforts
and diversifying the housing stock within neighborhoods.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
NEW
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
Community Development Corporation of
Utah
Direct aid in the form of grants/loans not to exceed $39,000 each to first-
time low to moderate income or LMI home buyers in Salt Lake City for
down payment assistance.
Direct aid in the form of grants/loans not to exceed $100,000 each to first-
time low to moderate income or LMI home buyers in Salt Lake City for
down payment assistance.
An application was also submitted to CDBG Housing #9 for the same
purpose.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Tenant Based Rental Assistance for survivors of domestic violence.
Funds will be used to rehabilitate housing intended for those aged 62 and
older
This applicant also applied for funding from the RDA's affordable housing
Notice of Funding Availability or NOFA.
Salt Lake Valley Habitat for Humanity Funds will be used to provide zero interest mortgages to low to moderate
income or LMI residents on newly built homes slated to be completed in
2026
NEW Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Housing Opportunities Inc.; Project
Subsidiary of the County Housing Authority
First Step House Funds will be used for rehabilitation associated with mold and meth
remediation as well as carpet, paint, and sprinkler system located at 434 S
500 E and 426 S 500 E
SALT LAKE CITY HOME PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/
RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Available to Allocate2,156,661$
APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#
Operational support, direct client rental assistance through Tenant Based
Rental Assistance (TBRA).
An application was also submitted to HOME-ARPA #5 for the same purpose.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Neighborworks Salt Lake
South Valley Sanctuary
Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) for eligible clients in The Road
Home's Rapid Re-housing Program.
An application was also submitted to HOME-ARPA #6 for the same purpose.
The Road Home Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 79.71
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 11
9 Volunteers of America, Utah FY23-24 99,732$ REQUEST:174,867$
FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:174,867$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:174,867$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:174,867$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 99,732$
10 Salt Lake City Corporation FY23-24 349,076$ REQUEST:400,000$
Salt Lake City Homebuyer Program FY22-23 -$ CDCIP:-$
FY21-22 -$ MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:-$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 349,076$
11 Salt Lake City Corporation FY23-24 153,550$ REQUEST:153,550$
FY22-23 153,718$ CDCIP:153,550$
FY21-22 984,634$ MAYOR:153,550$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 1,066,667$ COUNCIL:153,550$
FY19-20 939,266$
5 YR TOTAL 3,297,835$ 15% of HOME Award: $ 153,550.00
12 Salt Lake City Corporation FY23-24 102,366$ REQUEST:102,366$
Program Administration FY22-23 97,486$ CDCIP:102,366$
FY21-22 97,486$ MAYOR:102,366$
FY20-21 95,750$ COUNCIL:102,366$
FY19-20 88,507$
5 YR TOTAL 481,595$ 10% of HOME Award: $ 102,366
REQUEST:5,487,156$
CDCIP:2,156,661$
MAYOR:2,156,661$
COUNCIL:2,156,661$
ESTIMATED 24-25 GRANT AWARD:1,023,661$
ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME:800,000$
REALLOCATION:333,000$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:2,156,661$
If an increase in funding
If a decrease in funding
Allocate 10% of the annual HOME award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the
annual award and 15% of the estimated 2024-25 CDBG Program Income to Public Services.
Remove funding from the lowest scoring activities and then reduce additional applications
from lowest to highest scoring. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or
$10,000.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97YRC TBRA Program
Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new
construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing.
Funds will be used for development activities including acquisition, new
construction, and rehabilitation of existing housing.
Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) for eligible clients at the Youth
Resource Center (Pilot)
N/ACombined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 72.00
Housing Programs: Housing development that increases
the number of units available for income eligible residents
(Acquistion, New Construction).
Housing Programs: Housing development that increases
the number of units available for income eligible residents
(Acquistion, New Construction).
APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME
Allocate 10% of the annual HOME award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the
annual award for the CHDO Set-Aside. Add additional funding to the highest scoring
applications up to 75% of the average board recommended amount before moving to the
next highest scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or
$10,000.
CHDO Set Aside; Community Housing
Development Organization
PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUEST/
RECOMMENDED
MAYOR:
FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:
Funding to administer the HOME program (10% of the total HOME
allocation).
CDCIP Board Recommendation: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation
-$
COUNCIL:
CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD:
-$
-$
PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid rehousing,
homeless prevention, and housing stabilization assistance.
80.00
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 12
Estimated 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
1 FY23-24 629,102$ REQUEST:762,124$
FY22-23 519,185$ CDCIP 522,223$
Tenant Based Rental Assistance FY21-22 489,332$ MAYOR:522,223$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 510,797$ COUNCIL:522,223$
FY19-20 438,020$
5 YR TOTAL 2,586,436$
2 Utah AIDS Foundation FY23-24 75,319$ REQUEST:75,319$
HOPWA Supportive Services FY22-23 70,000$ CDCIP 75,319$
FY21-22 30,000$ MAYOR:75,319$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 30,000$ COUNCIL:75,319$
FY19-20 30,000$
5 YR TOTAL 235,319$
3 Utah AIDS Foundation FY23-24 107,600$ REQUEST:107,600$
Mental Health Services FY22-23 100,000$ CDCIP 107,600$
FY21-22 50,000$ MAYOR:107,600$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 -$ COUNCIL:107,600$
FY19-20 -$
5 YR TOTAL 257,600$
4 Utah Community Action FY23-24 172,835$ REQUEST:199,714$
STRMU/PHP/Supportive Services FY22-23 195,736$ CDCIP 199,714$
FY21-22 85,099$ MAYOR:199,714$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
FY20-21 162,044$ COUNCIL:199,714$
FY19-20 127,099$
5 YR TOTAL 742,813$
5 Salt Lake City Corporation FY23-24 27,985$ REQUEST:27,985$
Program Administration FY22-23 25,205$ CDCIP 27,985$
FY21-22 18,026$ MAYOR:27,985$
FY20-21 16,003$ COUNCIL:27,985$
FY19-20 14,166$
5 YR TOTAL 101,385$ 3% of HOPWA Award: $ 27,985
1,172,742$
932,841$
932,841$
932,841$
ESTIMATED 2024-2025 GRANT AWARD: $ 932,841 -$
REALLOCATION:-$ -$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:932,841$ -$
TOTAL MAYOR:
APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#
CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD:
Provides short term rental, mortgage, and/or utilities (STRMU) assistance,
permanent housing placement (PHP), and supportive services to persons
with HIV/AIDS
To provide management, oversight, and monitoring of the HOPWA program.
Provides Mental Health Services to persons with HIV/AIDS
COUNCIL:
REQUEST:
CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD:
Housing Connect; County Housing Authority
81.57
Behavioral Health: Support programs that provide connection to
permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
80.29
Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and
end homelessness.
932,841$
SALT LAKE CITY HOPWA PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
Provides Supportive Services to persons with HIV/AIDS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION REQUEST/
RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
Provides Tenant Based Rental Assistance to households with HIV/AIDS
At the March 5 public hearing, the applicant stated that a minimum of
$550,000 is needed to continue providing rental assistance to the 57
households in the program. At the $522,223 recommended funding level
they would need to end rental assistance to seven households. It appears
that this information was not disclosed to the advisory board or the Mayor
when making their funding recommendations. The Council will explore non-
HUD grant options for this funding gap.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
76.88
PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
Available to Allocate
83.00
Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and
end homelessness.
Housing Programs: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and
end homelessness.
Allocate 3% of the annual HOPWA award to program administration. Add additional funding to the highest
scoring applications up to 75% of the average board recommended amount before moving to the next
highest scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000.
If a decrease
Allocate 3% of the annual HOPWA award to program administration. Remove funding from the lowest scoring
activities and then reduce additional applications from lowest to highest scoring. As much as practicable, round to the
nearest $1,000 or $10,000.
CDCIP Board Recommendation: Fund the agencies at the above Final Funding Recommendation
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:
If an increase
FUND AVAILABILITY:
COUNCIL:
MAYOR:
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 13
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
1 Alliance House REQUEST:150,000$
1805 S Main Street Rebuild CDCIP 97,000$
MAYOR:97,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:97,000$
2 Asian Association of Utah REQUEST:265,693$
Tenant Based Rental Assistance CDCIP 193,608$
MAYOR:193,608$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:193,608$
3 First Step House REQUEST:277,200$
Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA)CDCIP 178,000$
MAYOR:178,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:178,000$
4 Odyssey House Inc REQUEST:300,000$
Transtition to Permanent Housing CDCIP 223,000$
MAYOR:223,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:223,000$
5 Utah Community Action REQUEST:760,742$
UCA HOME ARPA TBRA CDCIP 466,000$
MAYOR:466,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:466,000$
6 The Road Home REQUEST:550,000$
Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA)CDCIP 344,000$
MAYOR:344,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal/Strategy:
COUNCIL:344,000$
2,303,635$
1,501,608$
1,501,608$
1,501,608$
2024-2025 GRANT AWARD: $ 1,501,608 -$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $ 1,501,608 -$
-$
SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARPA PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
1,501,608$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/
RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#
Provides Tenant-Based Rental Assistance. This program will divert refugee, immigrant,
and victims of trafficking (VOT) community members, especially those with language
barriers, from potential homelessness situations and into resources provided at AAU,
including housing prevention, rehousing, and supportive services
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 81.29
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing
stabilization assistance.
Not Applicable;
One-time federal funding
related to the pandemic
Provides Tenant Based Rental Assistance to near homeless and individuals with severe
and persistent mental illness (SPMI)
An application was also submitted to CDBG Housing #1 for the same project. This
application is for short-term rental assistance to the current residents living at the
housing structure which will be demolished and rebuilt. This applicant also applied for
funding from the RDA's affordable housing Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 77.14
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing
stabilization assistance.
Not Applicable;
One-time federal funding
related to the pandemic
HOME-ARP Administration funding was allocated by Council prior to this awarding cycle. Final award amount is known, so no
contingencies are necessary.
FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:
CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD:
MAYOR:
COUNCIL:
TOTAL
REQUEST:
CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD:
MAYOR:
COUNCIL:
80.00Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 80.00Provide TBRA and Security Deposit assistance for elderly individuals or clients with
disabilities
An application was also submitted to HOME #8 for the same purpose.
Provide TBRA and Security Deposit assistance for individuals who are participating in
The Road Homes Rapid Re-Housing program and in need of finaicial assistance
An application was also submitted to HOME #7 for the same purpose.
Not Applicable;
One-time federal funding
related to the pandemic
Not Applicable;
One-time federal funding
related to the pandemic
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing
stabilization assistance.
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing
stabilization assistance.
Provide First and Last Month Rent for those moving out of transitional Housing. The
program aims to provide stable housing for clients transitioning into permanent housing
after residential treatment and for outpatient clients needing tenant-based rental
assistance
An application was also submitted to CDBG Public Services #15 for the same purpose.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 78.43
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing
stabilization assistance.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 80.71
Housing Programs: Housing programs that provide
applicable rent assistance in the form of rapid
rehousing, homeless prevention, and housing
stabilization assistance.
Provide TBRA and Security Deposit assistance for individuals to provide stablized
housing after tranistioning out of a sober living Not Applicable;
One-time federal funding
related to the pandemic
Not Applicable;
One-time federal funding
related to the pandemic
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 14
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
1 Advantage Services Inc REQUEST:85,000$
CDCIP:63,164$
MAYOR:63,164$
COUNCIL:63,164$
2 Boys and Girls Club of SL REQUEST:116,153$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$
3 Catholic Community Services of Utah REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$
4 Catholic Community Services of Utah REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
5 Children's Center Utah REQUEST:110,000$
Therapeutic Preschool Program CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
COUNCIL:30,000$
6 Children's Media Workshop REQUEST:85,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
30,000$
INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
PENDING CDBG-
CV ELIGIBILITY
RESPONSE
30,000$
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
30,000$
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs
that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population.
80.88
Travel/Well Schools
Transportation: Support access to transportation
prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable
populations
30,000$
50.67
Chef Trainer at CCS Kitchen Academy
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Employment/Lifeskills Coordinator at
CCS Kitchen Academy
Behavioral Health and build
Community Resiliency Program
Funding would provide salary/benefits for a Chef Trainer, who provides
classroom and hands-on instruction regarding food safety, health codes,
understanding and using equipment, and the preparation of a full-range of
foods.
This application is for the same program but a different employee position than
the application immediately below.
Provide paid supportive employment to individuals who are experiencing
homelessness, formerly homeless, or staying at the Homeless Resource Centers 81.46Provisional Supportive Employment
Program 63,164$
Provide Staff and operation costs for trauma-informed care and services that
support their mental and emotional health 71.67
Funding would provide salary/benefits for a Employment/Lifeskills Coordinator,
who provides classroom and hands-on instruction regarding food safety, health
codes, understanding and using equipment, and the preparation of a full-range
of foods.
This application is for the same program but a different employee position than
the application immediately above.
30,000$
30,000$
30,000$
80.46
PENDING CDBG-
CV ELIGIBILITY
RESPONSE
This program provides treatment for preschool-aged children, who have been
the victims of assault or trauma, and who are struggling to succeed in childcare
or preschool. Follow up with intensive group therapy to gain resilience and
learn essential skills.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 78.75
Community Resiliency: Expand access to early
childhood education to set the stage for academic
achievement, social development, and change the
cycle of poverty.
Provide operational costs for the Travel/Well program which provides mapping
and safety tools to increase safe pedestrian travel.
This is one of only two applications that advance the City's transportation goal
in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. There have been few transportation
applications during the five years.
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
287,752$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Regular CDBG Request
and Recommended 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#CDBG-CV
Council Funding
Total Regular
CDBG + CDBG-CV
Community Resiliency: Provide job training / vocational
training programs targeting low-income and
vulnerable populations.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options,
counseling support, and case management for those
experiencing behavioral health crisis.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs
that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 15
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
287,752$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Regular CDBG Request
and Recommended 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#CDBG-CV
Council Funding
Total Regular
CDBG + CDBG-CV
7 REQUEST:55,000$
CDCIP:-$
Housing Counseling MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
COUNCIL:-$
8 First Step House REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:33,000$
MAYOR:33,000$
COUNCIL:33,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
9 First Step House REQUEST:80,000$
CDCIP:61,500$
MAYOR:61,500$
COUNCIL:61,500$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
10 Friends of Switchpoint, Inc REQUEST:238,286$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
11 Friends of Switchpoint, Inc REQUEST:238,286$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
12 International Rescue Committee REQUEST:60,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
30,000$
INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
30,000$
Funds will facilitate Digital Inclusion staff to support refugee and other new
Americans access/learn digital technology skills, critical to improving their
economic and housing stability.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Digital Skills & Education Access to
Build Resiliency Refugees and New
Americans Community Resiliency: Promote digital inclusion
through access to digital communication technologies
and the internet.
-$
PENDING CDBG-
CV ELIGIBILITY
RESPONSE
69.25
Funds will provide salary for case management for homeless seniors and
veterans aged 55+ Located at Point at Fairpark
This application is for the same program but at a different location two block
away from the application immediately above.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Fairpark Permanently Supportive Case
Management Program
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options,
counseling support, and case management for those
experiencing behavioral health crisis.
30,000$
Funds will provide salary for case management for homeless seniors and
veterans aged 55+ located at Point at Airport
This application is for the same program but at a different location two block
away from the application immediately below.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Airport Permanently Supportive Case
Management Program
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options,
counseling support, and case management for those
experiencing behavioral health crisis.
30,000$
30,000$
72.88
72.75
Salaries and administrative costs for Peer Support Services (PSS) Program
which provides peer-based supportive services, delivered by certified Peer
Support Specialists.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Peer Support Services
Behavioral Health: Expand treatment options,
counseling support, and case management for those
experiencing behavioral health crisis.
61,500$
Provide supportive employment services to high-risk, high-need individuals in
our community caught in the cycles of relapse, mental illness, incarceration,
homelessness, and unemployment.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Employment Preparation and
Placement (EPP) Program
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational
training programs targeting low-income and
vulnerable populations.
33,000$
81.00
83.13
Community Development Corporation
of Utah
Provide salary and direct operational costs for a housing/homeowner
counseling program
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 71.38
Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing
tools to increase economic and/or housing stability.30,000$
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 16
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
287,752$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Regular CDBG Request
and Recommended 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#CDBG-CV
Council Funding
Total Regular
CDBG + CDBG-CV
13 Legal Aid Society of Salt Lake REQUEST:30,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
14 Odyssey House Inc.REQUEST:90,000$
CDCIP:47,000$
MAYOR:47,000$
COUNCIL:47,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
15 Odyssey House Inc.REQUEST:150,000$
CDCIP:85,000$
MAYOR:85,000$
COUNCIL:85,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
16 REQUEST:30,000$
CDCIP:-$
Survivial Services of Refugees MAYOR:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
COUNCIL:-$
17 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services REQUEST:55,000$
Community Dental Project CDCIP:40,000$
MAYOR:40,000$
COUNCIL:40,000$
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
18 Shelter The Homeless REQUEST:132,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
Provide security within the Gail Miller Resource Center or GMRC & Geraldine E.
King or Resource Center GEK facilities 24/7 and to provide 2 meals a day to
those in the two facilities
CDBG Public Services #21 was submitted by The Road Home for operational
expenses at the GMRC. ESG Part 1 #3 was submitted by Shelter the Homeless
for operational expenses at the same shelters. Also, ESG Part 1 #5 was
submitted by VOA for operational expenses at the GEK.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97GMRC & GEK Security and Food
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs
that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population
30,000$ $ -
76.63
Salaries, supplies, and lab fees for Community Dental Project, to support
homeless and low-income individuals with dental services.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Homeless Services: Expand support for medical and
dental care options for those experiencing
homelessness
40,000$ INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
Salt Lake American Language Interpretation Translation and Guidance,
Social Service Facilitators, Survival Resources and Services Facilitation of Access
to Survival Resources and Services to refugee community
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 69.13
Community Resiliency: Provide support for programs
that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population.30,000$ 30,000$
83.92
Provide financial assistance for low to moderate income or LMI clients to move
into transitional housing post in-patient treatment and while living in
transitional housing
An application was also submitted to HOME-ARPA #4 for the same purpose.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Transitional Housing
Housing: Support rent assistance programs to
emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to
prevent and end homelessness
88,000$
Provide bus passes to low to moderate income or LMI clients and clients in
their Harm Reduction Programming
This is one of only two applications that advance the City's transportation goal
in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. There have been few transportation
applications during the five years.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97House Bus Passes
Transportation: Support access to transportation
prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable
populations
50,000$ 3,000$
3,000$
81.38
82.13
Funds will be used for the Domestic Violence Victim Assitance Program to
provide free legal representation to victims of domestic violence, regardless of
their income.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Domestic Violence Victim Assistance
Community Resiliency: Build resiliency by providing
tools to increase economic and/or housing stability.
30,000$
PENDING CDBG-
CV ELIGIBILITY
RESPONSE
78.75
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 17
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
287,752$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Regular CDBG Request
and Recommended 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#CDBG-CV
Council Funding
Total Regular
CDBG + CDBG-CV
19 South Valley Sanctuary REQUEST:40,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$
20 The Inn Between REQUEST:100,000$
End of Life Care and Medical Respite CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
21 The Road Home REQUEST:101,048$ Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$
22 The Road Home REQUEST:50,000$
Housing Staffing CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
COUNCIL:30,000$
23 United Way of Salt Lake REQUEST:45,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$
24 Utah Legal Services REQUEST:50,000$
CDCIP:30,000$
MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
Provide Salary and benefits and direct operational costs to the Poverty
Disrupter Project that is aimed to expand employment and finanicial stability
for low to moderate income or LMI residents
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Poverty Disrupter Project
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational
training programs targeting low-income and
vulnerable populations.
30,000$
PENDING CDBG-
CV ELIGIBILITY
RESPONSE
76.00
Provide customer-centric referral connection services to SLC residents in need
that include warm transfers, follow-up services, and client satisfaction surveys.68.13Utah's Promise: Basic Needs for SLC
Residents
30,000$ 30,000$
Homeless Resource Centers
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:Homeless Services: Expand case management support
as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness
with permanent housing and supportive services.
The housing navigation staff work at four of the resource centers and
coordinate with other service providers to serve households referred into the
program.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97 77.92
Homeless Services: Expand case management support
as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness
with permanent housing and supportive services.
33,000$
33,000$
3,000$
3,000$
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:Behavioral Health: Support programs that provide
connection to permanent housing upon exiting
behavioral health programs. Support may include, but
is not limited to supporting obtaining housing via
deposit and rent assistance and barrier elimination
Provides homeless individuals who need hospice or other end of life care and
temporary medical respite housing for homeless individuals experiencing a
medical crisis.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless
services including Homeless Resource Center
Operations and Emergency overflow operations.
Operational support for the Gail Miller Resource Center to help with
emergency shelter, clothing, access to showers, support with community
resources, and connection to community housing options.
CDBG Public Services #18 and ESG Part 1 #3 were submitted by Shelter the
Homeless for operational expenses at the same shelters.
78.38
32,752$ 2,752$
Provide salary and benefits to the shelter director to work alongside victim
advocates and survivors to provide emergencty shelter and supportive services 76.17
76.00
Domestic Violence Case Manager and
Housing Assistance 30,000$ INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Homeless Services: Expand case management support
as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness
with permanent housing and supportive services.
Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 18
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
287,752$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Regular CDBG Request
and Recommended 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#CDBG-CV
Council Funding
Total Regular
CDBG + CDBG-CV
25 Wasatch Community Gardens REQUEST:39,884$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
26 REQUEST:97,144$
CDCIP:30,000$
Health and Housing Transtion Team MAYOR:30,000$
COUNCIL:30,000$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
27 YWCA Utah REQUEST:218,990$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
28 Ruff Haven Crisis Sheltering REQUEST:42,900$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
29 Neighborhood House Association REQUEST:87,387$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
N/A
N/A
There was an error where the program applied to the neighborhood
improvements category, but the proposed uses are ineligible under that
funding category. Housing Stability staff provided technical assistance to the
applicant to try and avoid the issue in the future. It should be noted that the
organization and the specific program have applied for and received funding in
the CDBG Public Services category for several years before.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Enhancing Early Childhood Education
-$ $ -
HUD provided guidance that this application is ineligible because as a
standalone service the primary beneficiary is the animal and not the intended
qualified population of individuals experienceing homelessness. If the service
was part of a larger holistic approach removing housing barriers, then a better
case could be made for eligibility.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Crisis Sheltering Services for
Companion Animals of Homeless
Individuals and Families -$ INELIGIBLE FOR
CDBG-CV
INELIGIBLE FOR REGULAR
CDBG
DISQUALIFED; APPLIED TO
WRONG CDBG CATEGORY
YWCA’s secure, emergency shelter offers 36 onsite and 4 overflow units to
victims left homeless due to domestic violence. Provide salary and benefits for
essential shelter staffing infrastructure.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97DV and Residential Services
Homeless Services: Provide support for homeless
services including Homeless Resource Center
Operations and Emergency overflow operations.
30,000$ 30,000$
Wasatch Homeless Health Care, Inc.
dba Fourth Street Clinic
Address social determinatnes of health including acces to health care and
housing stability.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Community Resiliency: Expand Access to health care
and housing stability.
33,000$ 3,000$
74.54
77.25
Provides farm-based employment, work readiness training, job placement
assistance, and mentoring for women facing and/or experiencing
homelessness. Request for One-time expenses related to farm move including
partial soil removal and disposal, Geotextile layer, Importing clean soil, and
palletizing and moving supplies.
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97Green Team Program
Community Resiliency: Provide job training/vocational
training programs targeting low-income and
vulnerable populations.
30,000$ 30,000$
72.42
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 19
Final 2024-2025 Funding Available: -$
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2024/2025
287,752$ Available to Allocate
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Regular CDBG Request
and Recommended 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLANAPPLICANT/PROJECT NAME#CDBG-CV
Council Funding
Total Regular
CDBG + CDBG-CV
30 REQUEST:280,000$
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$ Consolidated Plan Goal & Strategy:
REQUEST:2,577,078$ N/A -$
CDCIP BOARD:659,664$ N/A -$
MAYOR:659,664$ N/A -$
COUNCIL:659,664$ 287,752$ 947,416$
2024-2025 GRANT AWARD: $ 287,752 287,752$
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:287,752$ 287,752$
-$
CDCIP Board recommends that SLC open an additional competitive application and solicit additional applications.
59.88
Community Resiliency: Provide economic development
support for microenterprise buisness
FUND AVAILABILITY:AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION:
Administration Analysis:
CDBG-CV Administration funding was allocated by Council prior to this awarding cycle. Final award amount is known, so
no contingencies are necessary.
WeeCare, Inc. dba Upwards
CDCIP Advisory Board Recommendation:
Combined Admin & CDCIP Score:
Maximum score: 97
Boost Program / Business Operations &
Optimization Support & Tolls for Child
Care Providers
Funds will be used to expand ecnomnic opportunites for daycare providers in
SLC by training them to use essential tools to make their operations more
efficent and supporting hiring new low to moderate income jobs or LMJs
An application was also submitted to CDBG Neighborhood Improvements #2
for the same program.
CDCIP ADVISORY BOARD:
MAYOR:
COUNCIL:
TOTAL
-$ -$
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 20
Grant If MORE Funding Available If LESS Funding Available
CDBG
Allocate 20% of the annual CDBG award to program
administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award
and 15% of the estimated 2024-25 CDBG Program
Income to Public Services. Add additional funding to
the highest scoring applications up to 75% of the
average board recommended amount before moving
to the next highest scoring application. As much as
practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000.
Allocate 20% of the annual CDBG award to program
administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award
and 15% of the estimated 2024-25 CDBG Program
Income to Public Services. Remove funding from the
lowest scoring activities and then reduce additional
applications from lowest to highest scoring. As much
as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or
$10,000.
ESG
Allocate 7.5% of the annual ESG award to program
administration. Do not exeed the 60% Part 1 funding
cap. Add additional funding to the highest scoring
applications up to 75% of the average board
recommended amount before moving to the next
highest scoring application. As much as practicable,
round to the nearest $1,000.
Allocate 7.5% of the annual ESG award to program
administration. Do not exeed the 60% Part 1 funding
cap. Add additional funding to the highest scoring
applications up to 75% of the average board
recommended amount before moving to the next
highest scoring application. As much as practicable,
round to the nearest $1,000.
HOME
Allocate 10% of the annual HOME award to program
administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award for
the CHDO Set-Aside. Add additional funding to the
highest scoring applications up to 75% of the average
board recommended amount before moving to the
next highest scoring application. As much as
practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000.
Allocate 10% of the annual HOME award to program
administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award
and 15% of the estimated 2024-25 CDBG Program
Income to Public Services. Remove funding from the
lowest scoring activities and then reduce additional
applications from lowest to highest scoring. As much
as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or
$10,000.
HOPWA
Allocate 3% of the annual HOPWA award to program
administration. Add additional funding to the
highest scoring applications up to 75% of the average
board recommended amount before moving to the
next highest scoring application. As much as
practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000.
Allocate 3% of the annual HOPWA award to program
administration. Remove funding from the lowest
scoring activities and then reduce additional
applications from lowest to highest scoring. As much
as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or
$10,000.
COUNCIL FUNDING CONTINGENCIES
Note that there are no funding contingencies for the CDBG-CV or HOME-ARPA one-time federal funding related to the
pandemic because these are awards from prior years so the final actual amounts are known.
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 21
Goals Strategies
Housing: Provide expanded housing options for all economic and
demographic segments of Salt Lake City’s population while diversifying
housing stock within neighborhoods
1. Support housing programs that address the needs of aging housing stock through targeted rehabilitation efforts
and diversifying the housing stock within the neighborhoods
2. Support affordable housing development that increases the number and types of units available for qualified
residents
3. Support programs that provide access to home ownership
4. Support rent assistance programs to emphasize stable housing as a primary strategy to prevent and/or end
homelessness
5. Support programs that provide connection to permanent housing upon exiting behavioral health programs
6. Provide housing and essential supportive services to persons with HIV/AIDS
Transportation: Promote accessibility and affordability of multimodal
transportation options
1. Within eligible target areas, improve bus stop amenities as a way to encourage the accessibility of public transit
and enhance the experience of public transit
2. Within eligible target areas, expand and support the installation of bike racks, stations, and amenities as a way
to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation
3. Support access to transportation, prioritizing very low-income and vulnerable populations
Community Resiliency: Provide tools to increase economic and/or
housing stability
1. Support job training and vocational rehabilitation programs that increase economic mobility
2. Improve visual and physical appearance of deteriorating commercial buildings - limited to CDBG Target Area
3. Provide economic development support for microenterprise businesses
4. Direct financial assistance to for-profit businesses
5. Expand access to early childhood education to set the stage for academic achievement, social development,
and change the cycle of poverty
6. Promote digital inclusion through access to digital communication technologies and the internet
7. Provide support for programs that reduce food insecurity for vulnerable population
Homeless Services: Expand access to supportive programs that help
ensure homelessness is rare, brief and non-reoccurring
1. Expand support for medical and dental care options for those experiencing homelessness
2. Provide support for homeless services including Homeless Resource Center Operations and Emergency
Overflow Operations
3. Provide support for programs undertaking outreach services to address the needs of those living an
unsheltered life
4. Expand case management support as a way to connect those experiencing homelessness with permanent
housing and supportive services
Behavioral Health: Provide support for low income and vulnerable
populations experiencing behavioral health concerns such as substance
abuse disorders and mental health challenges
1. Expand treatment options, counseling support, and case management for those experiencing behavioral health
crisis
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Goals and Strategies
Note: language in BLUE is additional information added by Council staff
Exhibit A to Motion Sheet and Funding Allocations Resolution
Last Updated March 27, 2024 Attachment 2 - FY2025 HUD Grants Funding Log Page 22
Item C2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY24
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards, Jennifer Bruno, and Kira Luke
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Budget Amendment Number Three FY2024
Staff note: Four urgent items were adopted on December 12, 2023. The Council adopted most other
items on January 16 and two further items on February 6. The amendment remained open to consider
this single remaining item, A-10: downtown parking pay station replacements. Motion 1 would
authorize a single upfront payment and avoid $291,895 of interest expense compared to Motion 2
which would authorize an initial half year payment this fiscal year and then larger payments evenly
spread across years two through seven (fiscal years 2025 – 2030).
MOTION 1 – ADOPT REMAINING ITEM WITH SINGLE UPFRONT PAYMENT
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2024 final budget of Salt Lake City
for item A-10, authorizing the full payment of $1.612 million from General Fund Balance.
A-10: Downtown Parking Pay Station Replacements ($1.612 million from General Fund Balance)
MOTION 2 – ADOPT REMAINING ITEM WITH SEVEN-YEAR PAYMENT SCHEDULE
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance amending the Fiscal Year 2024 final budget of Salt Lake City
for item A-10 as shown on the motion sheet.
A-10: Downtown Parking Pay Station Replacements ($135,993 from General Fund Balance)
MOTION 3 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
FINANCIAL
UPDATEJanuary 16, 2024
FY 2023 REVENUES –ALL
$41.86 M Beyond Budget
Spike in Q4
$(100,000,000)
$-
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Sum of Actuals
Cumulative Actuals
Budget Amount
Forecasted amount
2
Major Category Budget Actual Variance
Taxes 287,722,785 313,755,533 26,032,748
Charges, Fees, and Rentals 4,432,794 5,811,688 1,378,894
Fines 3,765,174 3,519,515 (245,659)
Interest Income 2,071,154 11,814,671 9,743,517
Interfund Reimbursement 24,431,717 25,857,520 1,425,803
Intergovernmental Revenue 4,644,622 5,936,560 1,291,938
Licenses and Permits 40,736,114 43,946,510 3,210,396
Miscellaneous Revenues 3,455,828 4,691,828 1,236,000
Parking Meter Collections 2,635,475 2,616,329 (19,146)
Transfers 54,013,488 51,822,655 (2,190,833)
Grand Total 427,909,151 469,772,809 41,863,658
FY 2023 REVENUES –ALL
3
FY 2023 EXPENSES –ALL
$30 M Below Budget
$-
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
$600,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Sum of Actuals
Cumulative Total
Budget
4
FY 2023 EXPENSES –PERSONNEL
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Sum of Actuals
Cumulative Total
Budget
$15.7 M Below Budget
5
FY 2023 VACANCY SAVINGS BY DEPT
-$66,834
$789,622
$708,634
$666,939
$229,610
$949,060
$448,783
$93,219
$186,243
$722,641
$7,290,705
$366,830
$3,284,279
-20M M 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M 120M
911 Dispatch Bureau
City Council Office
Community & Neighborhoods
Department of Finance
Economic Development
Fire Department
Human Resources Department
Justice Court
Office of the City Attorney
Office of the Mayor
Police Department
Public Lands
Public Services
Variance
2023 Amend Budget
2023 Actuals
6
Major Category Budget Actual Variance
Personal Services 259,355,475 243,685,745 15,669,730
Charges and Services 96,134,386 86,396,601 9,737,785
Operating & Maintenance Supply 17,054,952 13,384,844 3,670,109
Capital Expenditures 7,102,802 3,053,081 4,049,721
Transfers Out 99,167,639 81,117,256 18,050,383*
Carry Forward Encumbrances 21,157,931
Grand Total 478,815,254 427,637,526 30,019,797
FY 2023 EXPENSES –ALL
7
FY 2023 YEAR END FUND BALANCE
TOTAL TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 160,123,682 202,575,741 Use of Fund Balance (22,836,870) (32,868,799) Prior Year Encumbrances (20,423,209) (21,157,931) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 116,863,603 148,549,011
Beginning Fund Balance Percent 24.85%33.42%Year End CAFR AdjustmentsRevenue Changes - - Expense Changes (2,257,746) (2,484,423) Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 114,605,857 146,064,588
Final Fund Balance Percent 24.37%32.86%Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (7,442,610) (1,170,982)
Adjusted Fund Balance 178,933,386 143,722,624
Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 38.05%32.33%
Projected Revenue 470,299,454 444,504,923
FY2023 Budget FY2024 Budget
8
Major Category FY 24 Budget FY 24 Actuals New Projection Variance
Taxes 261,229,840 261,229,840 258,222,765 (3,007,075)
Charges, Fees, and Rentals 5,427,047 5,427,047 6,452,523 1,025,476
Fines 2,561,547 2,561,547 2,567,590 6,043
Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000 0
Interfund Reimbursement 26,131,213 26,131,213 26,144,079 12,866
Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,134,621 5,234,598 99,977
Licenses and Permits 40,879,327 40,879,327 40,934,211 54,884
Miscellaneous Revenues 4,458,012 4,458,012 4,478,294 20,282
Parking Meter Collections 2,801,089 2,801,089 2,801,089 0
Transfers 9,938,944 9,938,944 9,938,944 0
Total w/o Special Tax 366,561,640 366,561,640 364,774,093 (1,787,547)
Sales Tax Additional ½49,084,479 49,084,479 49,484,479 400,000
Total General Fund 415,646,119 415,646,119 414,258,572 (1,387,547)
FY 2024 REVENUE PROJECTION
(NOVEMBER)
9
10
*Local Sales and Use Tax
1%
Referred to as General Sales Tax
Funding Our Future
0.5%
County Option Sales Tax for Transportation
0.25%
: City revenue is about 75% of tax at POS
: 61% of Local Sales and Use revenue
: 9% of Local Sales and Use revenue
SALES TAX OVERVIEW
HISTORICAL REVENUE
11
FY 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Actuals 61,864,445 64,897,423 66,324,147 73,778,034 86,532,634 89,090,809 89,500,000
Actuals Percentage Change 8.31%4.90%2.20%11.24%17.29%2.96%0.46%
Budgets 58,016,887 62,950,961 65,350,000 62,049,593 68,119,999 83,500,000 92,500,000
Budgets Percentage Change 6.78%8.50%3.81%-5.05%9.78%22.58%10.78%
Over/Under Budget 3,847,558 1,946,462 974,147 11,728,441 18,412,635 5,590,809 (3,000,000)
-
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Sales Tax
Budget vs Actuals
Budgets Actuals
*est.
SALES TAX DISTRIBUTION
(OCTOBER)
12
July - October Sales Tax Distribution: 75%
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 11,669,931 886,646 8%38.6%11,710,220 40,289 0%40.0%
Wholesale Trade 4,198,147 553,381 15%13.9%3,581,373 (616,775) -15%12.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 3,790,277 674,979 22%12.5%3,920,095 129,817 3%13.4%
Manufacturing 2,182,771 231,529 12%7.2%1,925,191 (257,580) -12%6.6%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,235,755 (160,637) -12%4.1%1,248,372 12,617 1%4.3%
Information 1,380,392 93,315 7%4.6%1,265,843 (114,549) -8%4.3%
Other Services (except Public Administration)880,333 (5,635) -1%2.9%840,602 (39,731) -5%2.9%
Utilities 829,472 151,120 22%2.7%883,431 53,959 7%3.0%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 861,274 118,225 16%2.9%876,139 14,866 2%3.0%
Construction 841,073 401,516 91%2.8%538,670 (302,403) -36%1.8%
Admin and Supp, Waste Mgmt and Rem Services 745,371 73,762 11%2.5%694,893 (50,478) -7%2.4%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 542,381 219,462 68%1.8%485,467 (56,914) -10%1.7%
Total 29,157,177 3,237,662 12.5%96.5%27,970,296 (1,186,881) -4.1%95.6%
2023 2024
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATESTREET
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKECITY, UTAH 84114-5455
ERINMENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETHTHOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITYCOUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________Date Received: _______________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: __________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 16, 2023
Darin Mano, Chair
FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:FY24 Budget Amendment #3 - Revised
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT:Greg Cleary (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2024 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $0.00 $1,730,731.89
FLEET FUND $975,177.00 $975,177.00
CIP FUND $410,177.00 ($750,177.00)
TRANSPORTATION FUND $0.00 ($205,177.00)
IMPACT FEES FUND $0.00 $6,527,961.00
IMS FUND $12,000.00 $4,531,083.00
MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND $1,705,700.79 $2,234,473.29
CDBG FUND $0.00 $46,642.50
TOTAL $3,103,054.79 $15,090,714.68
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2024 Budget Adjustments
The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2024.
Due to the timing of this budget amendment, there are no updates to the FY 2024 revenue
projections. Revenues are trending as expected are there are no reasons to assume any variance
to the initially adopted projections. The City has begun closing out the financials for Fiscal Year
2023, and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses and is finalized.
The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes
included in Budget Amendment #3.
With the adoption of Budget Amendment #3, the available fund balance will adjust to 14.08 percent of the FY
2024 Adopted Budget.
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $3,103,054.79 in revenue and
$15,090,714.68 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in eight (8) funds, with an
increase of nine (9.0) FTEs. The proposal includes 30 initiatives for Council review.
A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration
requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2023
(Third amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024)
An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the
Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending
June 30, 2024.
In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate staffing changes
2
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2023.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2023.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
___ _______
Jaysen Oldroyd
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Fire Department Single-Role Paramedics GF - 150,119.00 Ongoing 4.00
1 Fire Department Single-Role Paramedics GF - 10,400.00 One-time -
2 ARPA Employee Expenses Misc Grants - 14,225.00 One-time -
3 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division GF - 297,220.40 Ongoing 4.00
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division GF - 12,000.00 One-time -
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division IMS 12,000.00 12,000.00 One-time -
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division GF 20,000.00 One-time -
5 Streets Impact Fee Funding for 2100 South
Reconstruction Project Impact Fees - 3,323,590.00 One-time -
6 Streets Impact Fee Funding for 600/700 North
Reconstruction Project Impact Fees - 3,204,371.00 One-time -
7 Access Control System Upgrade - Security GF - 400,000.00 One-time -
8 Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet GF - (20,000.00)One-time -
8 Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet GF - 20,000.00 One-time -
8 Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet Fleet 20,000.00 20,000.00 One-time -
9 Road Marking Maintenance GF - 200,000.00 Ongoing -
10 Paystation Replacement GF - 135,992.49 One-time -
11 Rail Spur Removal GF - 205,000.00 Ongoing -
11 Rail Spur Removal CIP 205,000.00 205,000.00 One-time -
12 Temporary Shelter Community Misc Grants - 500,000.00 One-time -
13 Grant Employee - Finance - 6 Months @ 75%CDBG Grants - 43,642.50 Ongoing 0.75
13 Grant Employee - Finance - 6 Months @ 25%Misc Grants - 14,547.50 Ongoing 0.25
13 Grant Employee - Finance - One-time Costs CDBG Grants - 3,000.00 One-time -
14 Consulting for the Enterprise Billing Systems IMS - 250,000.00 One-time -
15 Mill & Overlay Pilot Program Equipment Transportation (205,177.00)One-time -
15 Mill & Overlay Pilot Program Equipment CIP 205,177.00 (955,177.00)One-time -
15 Mill & Overlay Pilot Program Equipment Fleet 955,177.00 955,177.00 One-time -
16 The Road Home - Family Hotel Winter Plan GF 300,000.00 One-time -
1
Move Funding for Downtown Central Precinct Tenant
Improvements for North Temple Substation and
Downtown Central Project
GF - (513,208.00)One-time -
1
Move Funding for Downtown Central Precinct Tenant
Improvements for North Temple Substation and
Downtown Central Project
GF - 513,208.00 One-time -
2 IMS FY 2023 Encumbrance Roll Forward IMS - 4,269,083.00 One-time -
3 Move Cultural Core Funding to Non-Departmental
from Arts Council Cost Center GF (250,000.00)One-time -
3 Move Cultural Core Funding to Non-Departmental
from Arts Council Cost Center GF 250,000.00 One-time -
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
-
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section A: New Items
Section D: Housekeeping
Section F: Donations
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Consent Agenda #2
1 Utah Department of Natural Resources/Forestry Misc Grants 200,000.00 200,000.00 One-time -
2 Department of Workforce Services Know Your Neighbor Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 One-time -
3 EPA Salt Lake City Schovaers Cleanup Misc Grants 495,200.00 495,200.00 One-time -
4 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG Grant)Misc Grants 38,000.00 38,000.00 One-time -
5 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) SLCPD Victim Advocates Misc Grants 346,131.80 346,131.80 One-time -
6 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG)Misc Grants 386,620.00 386,620.00 One-time -
7 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Rosewood Park Misc Grants 29,507.51 29,507.51 One-time -
8 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Riverside Park Misc Grants 20,517.38 20,517.38 One-time -
9 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Regional Athletic
Complex Misc Grants 12,881.77 12,881.77 One-time -
10 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Day Riverside LibraryMisc Grants 22,642.33 22,642.33 One-time -
11 FEMA Power Poles Cameras Misc Grants 39,200.00 39,200.00 One-time -
12 Utah Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Misc Grants 15,000.00 15,000.00 One-time -
Total of Budget Amendment
Items
3,103,054.79 15,090,714.68 - - 9.00
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1:
General Fund GF - 1,730,731.89 - - 8.00
Fleet Fund Fleet 975,177.00 975,177.00 - - -
CIP Fund CIP 410,177.00 (750,177.00) - - -
Transportation Fund Transportation - (205,177.00) - - -
Impact Fees Fund Impact Fees - 6,527,961.00 - - -
IMS Fund IMS 12,000.00 4,531,083.00 - - -
Miscellaneous Grants Misc Grants 1,705,700.79 2,234,473.29 - - 0.25
CDBG Operating Fund CDBG Grants - 46,642.50 - - 0.75
Total of Budget Amendment Items 3,103,054.79 15,090,714.68 - - 9.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Section I: Council Added Items
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
2
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
Revenue FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
- Revenue BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue
General Fund (Fund 1000)448,514,918 0.00 0.00 0.00 448,514,918.00
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 - 0.00 1,700,000.00
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)4,681,185 4,681,185.00
Water Fund (FC 51)176,637,288 176,637,288.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)289,941,178 289,941,178.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,865,892 19,865,892.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)403,513,000 403,513,000.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)25,240,459 25,240,459.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)12,710,067 12,710,067.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,925,000 3,925,000.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,108,969 36,800.00 975,177.00 33,120,946.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)36,254,357 9,000.00 6,000.00 12,000.00 36,281,357.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 - 5,597,763.00
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 1,705,700.79 26,823,040.79
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 62,416.00 462,416.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)14,659,043 14,659,043.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)32,341,586 32,341,586.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)30,199,756 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 410,177.00 56,313,826.25
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,888,581 3,888,581.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)60,932,137 60,932,137.00
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,623,631,451 263,800.00 41,751,732.25 3,103,054.79 - - 1,668,750,038.04
3
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Expenditure FY 2023-24 Adopted
Budgetg - Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense
General Fund (FC 10)448,514,918 204,200.00 (763,950.00)1,730,731.89 449,685,899.89
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 664,293.70 2,364,293.70
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)6,044,119 6,044,119.00
Water Fund (FC 51)177,953,787 177,953,787.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)301,832,622 301,832,622.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)22,947,474 22,947,474.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)520,438,997 520,438,997.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)28,263,792 28,263,792.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)17,938,984 17,938,984.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,498,750 14,461,793.00 975,177.00 47,935,720.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)38,702,171 9,000.00 6,000.00 4,531,083.00 43,248,254.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 (205,177.00) 9,494,823.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 46,642.50 5,644,405.50
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 2,234,473.29 27,351,813.29
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 65,472.00 465,472.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)10,212,043 10,212,043.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)34,894,979 5,777,784.00 40,672,763.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,708,286 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 55,412,179.25
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,370,012 3,370,012.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)63,574,655 63,574,655.00
- Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,009 14,892,993.00 41,655,131.95 15,090,714.68 - - 1,840,552,848.63
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
Contingent Appropriation
4
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Fire Department Medical Response Paramedics GF $150,119.00
GF $10,400.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Chief Karl Lieb /
Clint Rasmussen
For questions, please include Chief Lieb, Clint Rasmussen, Greg Cleary and Mary Beth Thompson
Current Status
The Salt Lake City Fire Department (SLCFD) currently operates three Medical Response Teams (MRTs) with another
funded at the Salt Lake City Airport beginning in January of 2024 for a total of four MRTs. Each MRT is comprised of 4
Firefighters (FFs), for a total of 16 FFs allocated and funded for the MRT program. All FFs currently allocated to the MRT
are Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs). By staffing a MRT with 3 EMTs and 1 Paramedic, rather than 4 EMTS, the
response capability would increase by
Replacing one of the EMTs as a Paramedic (Advanced Life Support or ALS) would increase the capability of the MRTs by
approximately 30% and allow them to perform more advanced patient assessments.
Paramedics are currently at a premium nationwide. Fortunately, SLCFD trains and remains appropriately staffed with
Paramedics on our Medic Engines (4-handed) for our optimal response model - two Paramedics on each of eight daily
Medic (ALS) Engines within SLC. These Medic Engines respond to the most serious medical and fire calls and should
remain staffed in this configuration as a 4-handed unit for maximum capability.
Proposal
This item it to establish 4 new FTEs (Medical Response Paramedics) and reclassify 4 existing FTEs (Firefighters) to
Medical Response Paramedics.
The SLCFD proposes to diversify our current MRT model by replacing and displacing a total of eight (8) MRT FF EMTs
with Medical Response Paramedics (SRPs). This would ideally staff one (1) Paramedic on each unit of four daily operating
MRTs.
The transition would expand the current MRTs response capability with an ALS component while maintaining the integrity
of the MRT as a FD resource responding from and residing within select SLCFD fire stations.
The SRPs would be civilian, potentially sworn, and eligible to participate in the Firefighters or Tier 2 Public
Safety/Firefighter retirement systems.
The SRPs would participate in a training regimen developed by the SLCFD for their specific role within our EMS response
Process
The SLCFD would realize eight (8) Medical Response Paramedics through a combination of additional FTEs and
conversion of existing FTEs:
1. SLCFD is requesting four (4) additional FTEs in the form of Medical Response Paramedics at a half-year cost $150,119
plus some start-up costs of $10,400. Full year funding for FY25 would be an additional budget increase of $142,519. No
January 2024.
2. SLCFD would retain the option to convert four (4) existing vacant FF positions currently funded for the MRT to SRPs by
the end of calendar year 2023.
3. The remaining four FFs displaced by the four requested SRPs would be utilized to fill 4-handed vacancies or additional
resources throughout Salt Lake City in an effort to reduce OT and consistently staff SLCFD heavy apparatus.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
A-2: ARPA Employee Expenses Misc. Grants $14,225.00
Department: Finance & Economic Development Prepared By: Mary Beth
Thompson
Funding in the amount of $14,225.00 is being requested to cover expenses for one grant employee for the remainder of the
Fiscal Year. Throughout the year, staffing levels have been in flux to support this ongoing need. The additional amount will
sufficiently cover the personnel expenses, factoring in vacancies saving
ARPA grant activity.
A-3: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-4: GF $297,220.40
GF $12,000.00
IMS $12,000.00
GF $20,000.00
Department: City Attorney Prepared By: Katherine Lewis
For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary, Katie Lewis
This funding is to establish and support four (4) new FTEs, creating the Legislative
office. The primary focus of this division will be on legislative affairs, with special focus on the legislative session and the
various impacts to Salt Lake City. The proposed funding in the amount of $297,220.40 assumes the positions to be filled
for six-months in Fiscal Year 2024, with a hire date in January. The four (4) positions are to be ongoing, with a financial
impact of $594,440.79 annually beginning if FY25. The four proposed positions are as follows:
Legislative Affairs Director (E34)
Senior City Attorney (E39)
Special Projects Analyst (E26)
Administrative Assistant (N21)
The supporting Ordinance:
Establishes that because the City Attorney manages the legal affairs of both the executive and legislative branches
of government, she reports to both the Mayor and Council chair, and can be removed at the discretion of the
Mayor.
Clarifies that the City A
Legislative Affairs.
Clarifies that the City Attorney may retain outside counsel on behalf of the City, if she concludes that the City
terest, is unable, or is unavailable to perform that legal work for the City.
Creates the Division of Legislative Affairs, which will be responsible for monitoring state and federal legislation
and engaging in advocacy, collaboration, and tracking of all legislative matters for the City.
legislative agenda, and will report to both branches of government on legislative priorities and policies.
This initial funding request accounts for one-time expenses for staff equipment such as computers ($12,000), funding via a
Non Departmental Transfer ($12,000), and a tenant improvement to established workspaces and necessary equipment
($20,000).
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
A-5: Streets Impact Fee Funding for 2100 South Reconstruction
Project
Impact Fees $3,323,590.00
Department: Public Services Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stevens
For questions, please include Mark Stevens, Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith, Jorge Chamorro
Engineering and Transportation are requesting a budget amendment to increase the appropriation of Streets Impact Fees
for the 2100 South Reconstruction Project. Multiple departments (Engineering, Transportation, the Finance Capital Asset
Planning Team, and the Office of the City Attorney) have conducted an analysis of the 2100 South Reconstruction Project,
and based on the increase in overall cost and the increase in the portion of the project related to Complete Streets, this
project is eligible for an additional $3,323,590 of Streets Impact Fees.
A-6: Streets Impact Fee Funding for 600/700 North Reconstruction
Project
Impact Fees $3,204,371.00
Department: Public Services Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stevens
For questions, please include Mark Stevens, Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith, Jorge Chamorro
Engineering and Transportation are requesting a budget amendment to increase the appropriation of Streets Impact Fees
for the 600 North/ 700 North Reconstruction Project. Multiple departments (Engineering, Transportation, the Finance
Capital Asset Planning Team, and the Office of the City Attorney) have conducted an analysis of the 600 North/ 700 North
Reconstruction Project, and based on the increase in overall cost and the increase in the portion of the project related to
Complete Streets, this project is eligible for an additional $3,204,371 of Streets Impact Fees.
A-7: Access Control System Upgrade Security GF $400,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro
For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro
The current access control system and devices across City buildings are now considered outdated and vulnerable, and staff
are proposing this be addressed before the system fails. This system is used for access badges issued to all City employees
to scan at certain doors to gain access to a given space. The Safety and Security Program proposes continuing the transition
to the S2 control access system as a City-wide standard.
With the recent allocation of funding from Council, the Public Safety Building and City Hall have upgraded their back-end
software. The funding requested for the next phase should transition Plaza 349 and the Justice Courts. Additionally, access
cards and card readers will be purchased for all four buildings. This project scope has been developed with staff from
various departments, including IMS, to ensure standards and needs are met. The estimated cost for this project is
$400,000.
A-8: Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet GF ($20,000.00)
GF $20,000.00
Fleet $20,000.00
Department: Public Services Compliance
Julie Crookston
Nancy Bean, Denise Sorensen
Public Services - Compliance is requesting a transfer of $20,000 to the Fleet Replacement Fund helping cover the
difference in cost to purchase two electric trucks instead of the originally funded smaller vehicles.
Fleet has been presented with an opportunity to order these electric trucks. One of the vehicles is part of the replacement
cycle, upgrading the originally intended vehicle to a more capable one, and will allow for Parking Enforcement operations
to continue during winter snow events, especially in areas like the Avenues. Additionally, the extra cargo space is needed to
transport equipment such as pay station kiosks and equipment as needed. In addition to these advantages, the second
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
4
vehicle will provide adequate space to transport three (3) mitigation officers (FTEs recently approved) and their supplies
for our Long-Term Parking Mitigation Team. The addition of these 2 EVs will bring Compliance closer to their goal to have
a 100% electric fleet.
A-9: Road Marking Maintenance GF $200,000.00
Department: Public Services Streets Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro
For question, please include Jorge Chamorro
Over the past few years the Transportation Division has been successful in obtaining funding for special road markings
through the CIP process, which include green paint on certain bike lanes.
After assessing the current inventory of assets made up of 1010 bike racks and 3.23 miles of green-painted bike lanes and
markings, staff has concluded that this ongoing maintenance need should no longer rely on the CIP process but rather be
added to the Streets operating budget. At this time the need does not justify upfront cost of equipment procurement,
Streets will develop a maintenance schedule and oversee a contract to perform the necessary maintenance work. If funding
is approved for this item, though most of the work would not occur in the winter, contract development and work
scheduling could be done in the meantime with work happening as weather allows.
The Streets Division is requesting $200,000 to be added to their budget for ongoing maintenance of road markings and
assets recently inventoried.
A-10: Pay Station Replacement GF $135,992.49
Department: Public Services/Finance
For questions please include Mary Beth Thompson and Jorge Chamorro
The current pay stations were purchased over 10 years ago. Due to their age, they are past the end of their useful life and at
risk of failure. New pay stations will allow the City to modernize the services offered to end users. The new pay stations
will provide more features for the public including parking payment, information sharing about events going on city wide,
the capability to pay by license plate technology, potential pollution sensors, and other innovative features. The
modernization of the pay stations will allow for smoother staff operations and continued service to end users. City Finance
is recommending a 7-year amortization rather than using the General Fund for one-time payment.
The amortization schedule is attached and includes a 7-year payment schedule, with $135,992.49 due in Year 1, and
$271,984.98 due in years two (2) through year seven (7). This includes an interest rate of 4.60%. The Council may consider
a 5-year schedule which is also attached, with an interest rate of 4.77%.
This item is being brought forward with Budget Amendment 3 due to the Request for Proposal process and market
conditions around equipment. At the time of budget development, staff did not have clear insight into the cost or timeline
of pay station procurement and delivery. Following the completion of the RFP process, staff feel it is best to proceed with
the selected vendor for the reasons outlined above.
A-11: Rail Spur Removal GF $205,000.00
CIP $205,000.00
Department: Public Services Engineering Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro /
JP Goates
For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro and JP Goates
Housekeeping request to move $205,000, approved by Council on BA#1 of FY23, item A-7, but placed on a GF cost center,
and were recaptured at the end of FY23, from Fund Balance to a Capital Project Cost Center for Engineering to initiate the
project.
An overview of the original request is below.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
5
The property on which this rail spur is located, 535 S. 600 W., was conveyed in 1997 by the City to a private party, with
partial consideration for this conveyance being an easement to construct, operate, and maintain a railroad spur and
associated facilities. Pursuant to an Amended and Restated Easement and Boundary Line Agreement, executed on July 3,
2000, the easement shall terminate if the City ceases to use the rail spur for more than one year, and that the City shall
r over one year, the City is
contractually obligated to remove it.
A-12: Temporary Shelter Community (Sanctioned Camping) Misc. Grants $500,000
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Greg
Cleary/Shellie Dietrich
Staff is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $500,000 to support startup costs associated with city efforts
around a Temporary Shelter Community or Sanctioned Camping. This funding will allow staff to roll out the program, with
ongoing assessment in needs, service levels, and funding being further developed in the coming months.
Specifically, the $500,000 will support the Police Departments role in this effort, with overtime staffing of offers at the
temporary shelters. In addition to the program, the most effective and efficient police staffing levels will also be assessed.
The Police Department will look to savings in other areas of the budget to help support the program, notably with the
savings realized with any vacant positions. Staff will return to council in the coming months with additional funding
requests as needed, and once there is better data and information available on what the program is to entail and what
might be needed to fund the ongoing efforts. Attached to this item is an ARPA financial reconciliation.
A-13: New Financial Grant Analyst Housing Stability Program
Support
CDBG Grants $46,642.50
Misc. Grants $14,547.50
Department: CAN Prepared By: Randy Hillier
For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Blake Thomas and Tony Milner
This request is for funding to support one FTE for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2024, which is intended to oversee the
grant allocation from the ARPA program, supporting the Housing Stability Program. The proposed Finance Grant Analyst
will work under the direction of the Deputy Director of Finance and will assist in the financial monitoring of multiple
grants to ensure compliance with city financial processes as well as state and federal grant requirements. The position will
be split across two grant funding sources 75% CDBG and 25% Misc. Grants. A job description for this position is
attached.
A-14: Consulting for Enterprise Billing Systems IMS $250,000.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony /
Gloria Cortes
For questions, please include Aaron Bentley, Gloria Cortes and Joesph Anthony
This item provides funding for consulting services for the Enterprise Billing systems for PUBS which is primarily used by
Sustainability and Public Utilities. PUBS needs to be replaced or upgraded, and the consultant work includes an analysis of
the city's needs and compare that to best practices and make a recommendation on where the city should be moving with
regards to future decisions. Microsoft has current solution mapped at the end of life by FY2025. Therefore, staff
are initiating the work to finding a solution in the current year have an adequate platform it in place by the beginning of
FY2025.
The proposal and expenses will be paid for by the annual allocation that IMS uses to collect its revenue on an annual basis
and is estimated based on 1,000 hours of work, at $250 per hour.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
6
A-15: Mill & Overlay Pilot Program - CIP Equipment Transp. Fund
($205,177.00)
CIP ($750,000.00)
Fleet Fund $955,177.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Denise Sorensen,
Julie Crookston, Greg Cleary
For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro, Dawn Valente, Mike Atkinson, and Mary Beth Thompson
Streets received notification in August that the Council had adopted the CIP application of equipment for the Mill &
Overlay program, totaling $750,000. As Streets began to coordinate with Fleet to purchase the equipment it became
apparent that the manufacturers ordering window for 2023 had already closed. The 2024 window has now opened,
however the manufacturer increased prices such that there is now a $205,200 deficit (includes make-ready). This item is to
request an additional $205,200 to cover the increase in price, as well as the transfer of the $750,000 from the CIP Fund to
the Fleet Replacement Fund.
The vendor has notified us that there will be another price increase, estimated at approximately $7,000 around mid-
December 2023. The next price increase will incur in July 2024, however if we do not have the equipment by Spring 2024
it will be very difficult to evaluate the pilot program as the equipment used during the first part of the fiscal year has been a
combination of shared and/or rented.
This item includes financial adjustments from the Transportation Fund (1/4 cent sales tax), CIP Funds, and the Fleet Fund
to ensure the most appropriate use of funds for the proposed capital equipment procurement. When initially preparing the
Capital Budget, the Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program was funded in the amount of $750,000 with the ¼ cent
sales tax , which is to be dedicated to transportation related projects. However, after
consultation with city staff, it was determined that the ¼ cent sales tax is not intended to support equipment expenses. As
a result, staff is reallocating the $750,00o to the Complete Streets Project, and is proposing to utilize an additional
$205,177 of available Transportation Funds to support the Complete Streets Reconstruction Project, where this funding
source is better aligned and is eligible for the given project.
This adjustment results in a reduction of general CIP funds needed to support the Complete Streets Reconstruction Project
in the amount of $750,000, which are to be transferred to the Fleet Fund for the capital equipment procurement in
support of the Mill and Overlay project. The end result of these adjustments includes the use of $205,177 of Transportation
Funds to support the Complete Streets Project.
A-16: The Road Home - Family Hotel Winter Interim Plan GF $300,000.00
Department: CAN Prepared by: Brent Beck, Greg
Cleary
For questions, please include Blake Thomas and Andrew Johnston
In support of The Road Home program, staff is proposing the use of up to $300,000 from General Fund Fund Balance to
assist the State by adding additional motel options for families ahead of the winter months. The goal of this program is to
expand support for families to step out of the cold into a sheltered situation until the opening of the Family Non-
Congregate Shelter in 2024. The use of $300,000 from GF Fund Balance is proposed following council action in Budget
Amendment #2, which allocated $1M back to Fund Balance, associated with the Discontinued Deeply Affordable Housing
Development.
Attached is the Road Home Family Hotel Winter Interim Plan which outlines the program in more detail, challenges the
program faces, staffing levels, and how additional funds will support the program.
The Administration is requesting that the Council hold a Straw Poll on funding this initiative to expedite the budget for
use in this program.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
7
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Moving Funding for Downtown Central Precinct Tenant
Improvements for North Temple Substation and Downtown Central
Project
GF ($513,208.00)
GF $513,208.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Brent Beck
For question, please include Brent Beck, Blake Thomas, Tammy Hunsaker, JP Goates
Funding for the Downtown Central Precinct Tenant Improvements for North Temple Sub Station and Downtown Central
Project in the amount of $513,208 was added by the Council to the CAN budget during the budget decision making
process. However, this funding should have gone to Public Services since it will be the Facilities division that will be
managing the improvements. This item does not allocate any additional funding, but simply moves funding from one
department to another for the same work.
D-2: IMS FY 2023 Encumbrance Roll Forward IMS $4,269,083.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony /
Gloria Cortes
For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortes, Aaron Bentley
IMS has encumbered money that was expected to be paid out of the FY23 funds and either will need to be paid, or has
already been paid in FY24. These encumbrances are listed in the Carry Over Encumbrance reports. All of these items have
been approved for purchase by central finance in a prior year. These expenses will be paid for by the annual allocation that
IMS uses to collect it's revenue on an annual basis.
D-3: Move Cultural Core Funding to Non-Departmental from Arts
Council Cost Center GF ($250,000.00)
GF $250,000.00
Department: Non-Departmental, Economic Development Prepared By: Greg Cleary
For questions, please include: Mary Beth Thompson, Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Felicia Baca
This item is to move funds from Non-Departmental budget. This
is an effort to align funding with the appropriate cost center within the new financial system.
Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources
Section F: Donations
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
8
Section G: Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda
G-1: Utah Department of Natural Resources/Forestry Misc. Grants $200,000.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL) has awarded Salt Lake City $200,000 for the purposes of removing
navigational hazards, including downed trees, garbage, and other debris from the Jordan River from 2100 South to 2400
North. This funding will provide for safer conditions on the river channel for recreational boaters.
Public hearing was held on September 19, 2023
No match is required.
G-2: Department of Workforce Services-- Know Your Neighbor Misc. Grants $100,000.00
Department: Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
DWS is extending the Salt Lake City's Know Your Neighbor contract. The original contract was for $100,000 to pay for the
salary and benefits of a full-time volunteer coordinator from October 1, 2022, to September 30,2023. The extension will
include an increase of $100,000 to extend the period for one year starting October 1, 2023, and ending September 30,
2024. Thus, making the total amount of the contract $200,000. This is a refugee volunteer program that runs through the
office. This program benefits refugee clients as well as people from the larger community who volunteer to help.
Public Hearing will be held November 7, 2023
No Match is required.
G-3: EPA Salt Lake City Schovaers Electronics Cleanup Misc. Grants $495,200.00
Department: RDA Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This is one of two Brownfields grants awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Salt Lake City area for
the purpose of cleaning up land of hazardous substances, pollutant or contaminants for the revitalization of the
properties. These grants are part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). This grant has been awarded to
Salt Lake City in the amount of $495,200 to conduct remediation activities at the former Schovaers site (22 South Jeremy
Street) in Salt Lake City. A second grant for $1 million was awarded to Salt Lake County for the assessment and cleanup
projects in Magna Township.
Public hearing was held on December 13, 2022
No Match is required.
G-4: Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Misc. Grants $38,000.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) provides state, local, tribal and territorial emergency
management agencies with the resources required for implementation of the National Preparedness System and works
toward the National Preparedness Goal of a secure and resilient nation. This is the annual allocation from the state and will
be used to support Emergency Management functions and programs.
A public hearing was held on May 16, 2023.
A 50% match is required.
G-5: Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) - SLCPD Victim Advocates Misc Grants $346,131.80
Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Salt Lake City Police Department is requesting continuation funding for our SLCPD VOCA grant funded Victim
Advocate positions. Additionally, there are emergency funds for assisting victims included in the application.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
9
The grant will continue to fund 2.69 existing FTEs and includes emergency funds that will be used to help victims. This is a
two-year grant. The period of performance starts July 1, 2023, and ends June 30,2025.
Public hearing will be on November 7, 2023.
No match is required.
G-6: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Misc. Grants $386,620.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) allows states and local governments to support a
broad range of activities to prevent and control crime and to improve the criminal justice system, some of which could have
environmental impacts.
The Salt Lake City Police Department will use this money for the following:
Professional Travel Training for Sworn and Civilian Staff - $40,125
Pole Cameras - $20,000
High Speed License Plate Recognition (+Accessories) - $22,970
Climbing Equipment - $20,160
Night Vision Goggles and Mounts - $49,098
Optics - $11,192
Ballistic Rated Windshields - $19,500
Surveillance Trailer Maintenance and Replacement - $14,000
K9 GPS and Narcotics Enforcement Supplies - $6,132
Community Policing and Targeted Enforcement Overtime - $76,100
Subaward to Salt Lake County (BJA allocation) - $53,672
Subaward to Unified Police Department (BJA allocation) - $53,671
No new staff members are proposed as part of this item.
A public hearing was held on September 19, 2023.
No match is required.
G-7: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Rosewood Park Misc. Grants $29,507.51
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports necessary infrastructure for the installation of one (1) approved dual port charger at Rosewood Park,
located at 1400 North 1200 West in Salt Lake City. This charger will be available to the public 24/7. There is no cost related
to the charger in this incentive. Accepting the incentive payment obligates the participant to maintain functioning chargers
and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years, starting from the date of the incentive payment.
The maintenance cost of this item is the lesser of the following: $29,507.51 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023
No match is required.
G-8: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Riverside Park Misc.
Grants $20,517.38
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports necessary infrastructure for the installation of one (1) dual port AC Level 2 charger at Riverside Park,
located at 1450 West Leadville Avenue in Salt Lake City. This charger will be available to the public 24/7. There is no cost
related to the charger in this incentive. Accepting the incentive payment obligates the participant to maintain functioning
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
10
chargers and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years, starting from the date of the incentive payment. No new
staff positions.
The maintenance cost of this item is lesser of the following: $20,517.38 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023.
No match is required.
G-9: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Regional Athletic Complex Misc. Grants $12,881.77
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports the necessary infrastructure for the installation of one (1) approved dual port AC Level 2 charger at the
Regional Athletic Complex, located at 2080 Rose Park Lane in Salt Lake City. This charger w ill be available to the public
24/7. There is no cost related to the charger in this incentive. Accepting the incentive payment obligates the participant to
maintain functioning chargers and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years, starting fr om the date of the
incentive payment. No new staff members.
The maintenance cost of this item is the lesser of the following: $12,881.77 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023.
No match is required.
G-10: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Day Riverside Library Misc. Grants $22,642.33
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports the necessary infrastructure for the installation of two (2) approved dual port AC Level 2 chargers at the
Day Riverside Library, located at 1575 West 1000 North in Salt Lake City. The project will result in a total of four (4) char ging
ports. The chargers will be available to the public 24/7. There is no cost related to the in this incentive. Accepting the incentive
payment obligates the participant to maintain functioning chargers and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years,
starting from the date of the incentive payment. No new staff members.
The maintenance cost of this item is the lesser of the following: $22,642.33 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023.
No match is required.
G-11: FEMA Power Poles Cameras Misc. Grants $39,200.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
FEMA is providing funding to the Fire Department for the temporary installation of cameras onto existing powers poles as
needed.
A public hearing was held May 16, 2023.
No match is required.
G-12: Utah Crimes Against Children Task Force Misc. Grants $15,000.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) has created the Utah Internet Crimes Against Children
(ICAC) Task Force Program, which is a national network of state and local law enforcement cybercrime units. The national
ICAC program assists state and local law enforcement agencies to develop an effective response to cyber enticement, sexual
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
11
exploitation of a minor, and other child sexual abuse material cases. The Police Department will utilize this funding to
support its ongoing efforts to protect children from cybercrime.
Public Hearing was held on August 15, 2023.
No match is required.
Section I: Council Added Items
Impact Fees - Summary Confidential
Data pulled 07/20/2023
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 1,402,656$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 273,684$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 16,793,487$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,304,485$ D
24,774,312$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month
202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202407 (Jul2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202408 (Aug2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202409 (Sep2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202410 (Oct2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202411 (Nov2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202412 (Dec2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202501 (Jan2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202502 (Feb2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202503 (Mar2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202504 (Apr2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202505 (May2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202506 (Jun2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202507 (Jul2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202508 (Aug2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202509 (Sep2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202510 (Oct2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202511 (Nov2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 1,103,628$ 1,103,628$
202512 (Dec2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 113,748$ 113,748$
202601 (Jan2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 3,960$ 3,960$
202602 (Feb2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 26,929$ 26,929$
202603 (Mar2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 95,407$ 95,407$
202604 (Apr2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 1,065,383$ 1,065,383$
202605 (May2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 95,762$ 95,762$
202606 (Jun2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 53,972$ 53,972$
Total, Currently Expiring through Jun 2026 -$ -$ -$ 2,558,788$ 2,558,788$
FY
2
0
2
3
Calendar
Month
FY
2
0
2
4
FY
2
0
2
5
FY
2
0
2
6
Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 07/20/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Police Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Police Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Police Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
IFFP Contract - Police 8423003 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$
Grand Total 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$
A
Fire
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Fire Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Fire Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Fire Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Fire Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Fire Training Center 8417015 (499,533)$ -$ (499,533)$ -$
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ -$ 58.00
IFFP Contract - Fire 8423004 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ B
IF Excess Capacity - Fire 8423006 2,200,000$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$
Grand Total 1,712,546$ 3,021$ 1,700,467$ 9,058.00
Parks
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Parks Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Parks Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Parks Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Parks Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 261,187$ -$ 261,187$ -$
Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 700,000$ -$ 700,000$ -$
Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 16,959$ 1,705$ 15,254$ -$
JR Boat Ram 8420144 3,337$ -$ 3,337$ -$
RAC Parcel Acquisition 8423454 395,442$ -$ 395,442$ 0$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ -$ 42$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,262$ 23,000$ -$ 262$
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$
9line park 8416005 16,495$ 855$ 13,968$ 1,672$
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$
Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ 4,328$ -$ 8,103$
FY IFFP Contract - Parks 8423005 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$
9Line Orchard 8420136 156,827$ 132,168$ 6,874$ 17,785$
Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ 253,170$ 21,830$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,042,694$ 240,179$ 764,614$ 37,902$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 56,109$ -$ 1,302$ 54,808$
Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 608,490$ 443,065$ 93,673$ 71,752$ C
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 156,565$ 44,791$ 30,676$ 81,099$
Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 555,030$ 52,760$ 402,270$ 100,000$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 254,159$ 133,125$ 13,640$ 107,393$
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 122,281$ -$ 1,310$ 120,971$
Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$
Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 160,819$ -$ 2,781$ 158,038$
Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ 156,146$ 104,230$ 159,624$
RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 179,323$ -$ 712$ 178,611$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 266,306$ 10,285$ 4,262$ 251,758$
900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 287,848$ -$ -$ 287,848$
Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 300,000$ -$ 678$ 299,322$
Open Space Prop Acq-Trails 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$
SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ -$ 319,139$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 428,074$ 5,593$ 23,690$ 398,791$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 446,825$ 18,467$ 14,885$ 413,472$
Open Space Prop Acq-City Parks 8423452 450,000$ -$ -$ 450,000$
Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ 9,440$ 34,921$ 465,638$
Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 499,563$ -$ 106$ 499,457$
RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$
Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 867,962$ -$ 2,906$ 865,056$
Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 1,000,000$ -$ 3,096$ 996,905$
SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ 41,620$ 62,596$ 1,200,466$
GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,177,849$ 524,018$ 930,050$ 1,723,781$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,149,123$ 69,208$ 94,451$ 2,985,464$
Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000$ -$ -$ 4,350,000$
Grand Total 24,106,716$ 1,913,351$ 4,236,078$ 17,957,287$
Streets
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Street Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Street Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Street Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Street Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,292$ -$ 1,292$ -$
500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 15,026$ 11,703$ 3,323$ -$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 13,473$ -$ 13,473$ -$
900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$
Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ 25,398$ -$ -$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ -$ 13,000$ -$
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 63,955$ -$ 63,955$ -$
Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ -$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 12,925$ 940$ 2,244$
Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ 38,084$ 6,316$
Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ 16,693$ 18,699$
500 to 700 S 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ D
900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 17,300$ 11,746$ 29,734$
1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$
200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$
300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$
Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$
Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 110,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 281,586$ 124,068$ 40,300$ 117,218$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 181,846$ -$ 542$ 181,303$
200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 252,000$ -$ -$ 252,000$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 780,182$ 46,269$ 393,884$ 340,029$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 836,736$ 55,846$ 45,972$ 734,918$
700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 1,120,000$ -$ 166$ 1,119,834$
1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 3,111,335$ 1,192,649$ 224,557$ 1,694,129$
Grand Total 8,267,218$ 1,503,600$ 987,926$ 5,775,692$
Total 34,095,480$ 3,419,972$ 6,924,471$ 23,751,037$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
8484002
24,774,312$
8484003
8484005
16,793,487$
6,304,485$
$273,684
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
8484001
1,402,656$
RESOLUTION NO. _____ OF 2023
(Requesting Admission to the Firefighters Retirement System)
WHEREAS, Utah Code Sections 49-23-101 et seq. authorize an employer of emergency
medical service personnel to elect to include such personnel in the Tier 2 Firefighter Retirement
system with the Utah Retirement System; and
WHEREAS, employers of full time emergency medical service personnel including
paramedics for interfacility transport, including Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”), are
authorized to elect to include such personnel in the Tier 2 Firefighter Retirement system with the
Utah Retirement System; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to provide benefits authorized by Utah state law for
the public safety personnel by the City; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council of Salt Lake City (“City Council”) to
exercise the election authorized by statute to approve and authorize coverage under the Fighters
Retirement Systems for City firefighter and emergency medical services personnel, including the
City’s social workers who provide emergency response services.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1.Election and Authorization. The City Council hereby elects to cover the City’s
emergency service personnel, also including the City’s social workers who provide emergency
response services, who can be qualified for such coverage pursuant to Utah Code Sections 49-23-
101 et seq. in the Tier 2 Firefighter Retirement System with the Utah Retirement System. The
Mayor is hereby authorized to undertake all of the necessary actions to enroll the City in the benefit
programs of the Firefighters Retirement Systems offered by Utah Retirement Systems, including
the retirement coverage and death benefit coverage for qualified employees under the laws and
regulation of the Utah Retirement Systems.
2.Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon passage.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _________, 2023.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY RECORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
______________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney
Date: ______October 9, 2023________
Medical Response Paramedic
Job Profile Summary Under the supervision of a Fire Department Officer and the direction of emergency room medical
personnel, and in compliance with Utah State and Fire Department operating procedures, provides basic
and advanced life support and medical care to victims of sudden illness and accident, at the emergency
scene, and during transport to an appropriate medical facility. This is a specialized work performed in
accordance with National and Salt Lake City Fire Department performance and training standards.
Job Description
TYPICAL DUTIES:
• Responds to medical emergencies in fire department vehicle with EMT partner. Examines
patient at emergency scene and establishes priorities for treatment. Communicates with
appropriate hospital emergency room. Provides all treatment according to orders from
hospital staff or standing orders, including ECG monitoring, administering IV fluids and
medications, defibrillation intubation, splinting and bandaging, extraction, and other
treatments necessary for stabilization of patients prior to arrival at emergency room. May
transport patients with assistance from contracted ambulance company.
• Performs daily medical equipment checks, cleans, and makes equipment used at medical
scene serviceable after each call. Keeps record of each medical emergency and patient on
forms provided by Utah State Division of Health. Maintains company medical logbook.
• Responds to other emergencies with assigned partner as dispatched, carries out orders of
company/division officer and other activities necessary for handling an emergency. Acts to
maintain safety for self and other members of the team.
• Participates in drills and classes as provided by the department or company officer.
Participates in physical fitness training. Demonstrates medical skills as required by
appropriate authority. Fulfills paramedic certification requirements as established by the
State of Utah. Conducts periodic medical training for members as assigned.
• Complies with city and department policies and procedures. Completes daily job
assignments from company officer to maintain fire station, grounds, and equipment in
clean and serviceable condition. Meets with company officer to assess job performance.
• Maintains the ability to perform medical activities and participates in all functions
required of a paramedic on the Salt Lake City Fire Department.
• Performs other duties as required.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
• Successful completion of paramedic training and maintenance of certification and licensure
as a Utah State Paramedic, including CME attendance and all required testing. Such
certification must be in good standing at all times.
• Must satisfy the medical condition requirements of National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) Standard 1582.
• Possession of valid driver license.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
• Considerable exposure to stressful situations as a result of human behavior while
responding to emergency and non-emergency situations.
Medical Response Paramedic
• Moderately heavy physical activity. Required to stand, walk, or sit uncomfortably for
extended periods. Exposure to disagreeable elements such as cold, dampness, toxic
fumes, smoke, and noise. Intermittent exposure to infectious diseases, emotionally upset
patient, and relatives. Frequent exposure to extreme weather conditions.
• May be subjected to lifting weights of 50 pounds or more, aroused out of sleep by fire alarm
gongs. Subjected to rapid changes in temperature by responding from station facilities to
outside temperatures. May be required during prolonged emergency operations to work
without sleep for extended periods. Subjected to traffic hazards during emergency
responses through city traffic.
The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by
persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities
and skills required of personnel so classified.
All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with
disabilities.
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ___ of 2023
(Division of Legislative Affairs and City Attorney Reporting)
An ordinance amending chapter 2.08.040 of the Salt Lake City Code to add a division of
legislative affairs to the Department of the City Attorney and to clarify the City
Attorney s reporting obligations to both branches of government.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation is the capitol city and engages in year-
round efforts to collaborate with and advocate before the Utah legislature.
WHEREAS, the Utah legislature is meeting more frequently and opening more
bill files that affect Salt Lake City and all Utah municipalities.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City has a strong interest in monitoring trends in federal
legislation.
WHEREAS, given the City s legislative goals, the City is committed to
establishing a fulltime staff of City employees who are engaged in and supporting the
City s legislative interests.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor have a significant interest in equally
participating in the direction of the City s collaboration and advocacy for the City s
legislative interests.
WHEREAS, under City Code 2.08.040, the Salt Lake City Attorney s Office is
responsible to both the Mayor and the City Council, and the executive and legislative
branches enjoy equal and independent access to the services of the City Attorney s
Office.
2
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City now desires to amend city code to
create a division of legislative affairs within the Department of the City Attorney.
WHEREAS, the division of legislative affairs will direct the City s legislative
advocacy and collaboration efforts, and will be equally responsible to the Mayor and the
City Council.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City also desires to clarify the
Department of the City Attorney s reporting obligations to both branches of government
and clarify the instances in which the City may hire outside counsel.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That section 2.08.040 of the Salt Lake City Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
2.08.040: OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY:
A. Functions:
1. The city attorney shall be the chief legal officer of the city and shall be
responsible to the mayor and city council for the proper administration of the
legal affairs of the executive and legislative branches of city government. The
city attorney shall report to both the mayor and the council chair and may be
removed at the discretion of the mayor.
2. The executive and legislative branches of government shall enjoy equal and
independent access to the services of the office of the city attorney with reference
to their respective functions and duties. It shall be the responsibility of the city
attorney to administer the office of the city attorney in a manner which will enable
the mayor and city council to fulfill their respective duties in a timely fashion.
3. The foregoing notwithstanding, the city attorney shall not in any instance, either
personally, or by his or her deputies, act as both prosecutor and advocate before
(and at the same time advisor to) any board, commission, agency, officer, official
or body of the city. In cases where such a conflict shall arise, special counsel may
be employed who shall not be subject to the control or direction of the city
attorney in such matter, and who shall provide the legal service to or before such
board, commission, agency, officer, official or body.
3
4. Supervise the office of the city recorder, the risk management division, and the
division of legislative affairs.
B. Outside Executive Or Legislative Counsel: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed
to prohibit the city attorney from retaining outside counsel for either the city council or
mayor from appropriated funds, provided, however, that the city attorney will retain
outside counsel for either the mayor or city council only after he/she concludes that the
office of city attorney has a conflict of interest, is unable, or is unavailable to perform the
legal work requested on behalf of such branch of city government.
C. City Recorder:
1. The city recorder shall be assigned to the office of the city attorney and be under
the administrative direction of the city attorney; however, the recorder shall be
responsible to the city council, which shall have equal and independent access for
services with respect to legislative functions.
2. The city recorder shall keep the corporate seal, the official papers and records of
the city, as required by law; the record of the proceedings of the city, as required
by law; and shall attest legal documents of the city and do those other matters
prescribed by law.
D. Division of Legislative Affairs.
1. The division of legislative affairs will be responsible for monitoring state and
federal legislation and engaging in advocacy, collaboration, and tracking of all
legislative matters for the city.
2. The director of legislative affairs will be responsible for working with the
executive and legislative branches of city government to craft a legislative agenda
for the city and will report to both branches of city government on legislative
priorities and policies.
SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of __________________
2023.
____________________________________
Darin Mano, Council Chair
ATTEST:
4
_________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________.
_________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed.
_______________________________________
MAYOR
_________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2023.
Published: __________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL SERVICES 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 035X
LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DIRECTOR 034X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
LEGISLATIVE & POLICY MANAGER 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST III 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER)037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER)035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
APPENDIX B APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT
Effective June 25, 2023
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 033X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 033X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 036X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X*
INFORMATION MGT SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 038X
JUSTICE COURT ADMINISTRATOR 037X
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR
024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POLICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC LANDS
PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
URBAN FORESTRY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PUBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
SAFETY & SECURITY DIRECTOR 037X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, remov
or modified without approval of the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the
Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council
members elect are also equivalent to those provided to full time employees.
Director of Legislative and Government Affairs
The Director of Legislative and Government Affairs reports to the City Attorney and is responsive
to both the Legislative and Administrative branches of Salt Lake City government.
The Director is responsible for monitoring and interpreting state legislation, appropriations and
authorizations, and proposed or existing state regulations, keeping both the Legislative and
Administrative branches of Salt Lake City government informed of legislative impacts to the City,
and advising and developing policy responses.
Incumbent must be able to work extended hours and on weekends as needed, especially while the
Legislature is in session.
Duties:
-Helps ensure City departments are apprised of existing and proposed state regulations and
laws and ensures such regulations and laws are fully implemented.
-Knows City legislative priorities and advocates for City legislative priorities before the
State legislature.
-Communicates effectively between the Administrative and Legislative branches of Salt
Lake City government to -upon and
clearly communicated internally and externally.
-Knows City department-specific legislative priorities and negotiates the acceptable City
priority when multiple departments have different/conflicting priorities.
-Ensures City departments and Administrative and Legislative branches of government
timely receive information necessary to understand and participate in City legislative
priorities.
-Participates with City elected officials and department leadership in establishing direction,
goals, and policies.
-Meets with staff in both branches of City government to determine needs and challenges.
-Oversees staff in the Office of Legislative Affairs and outside contracted lobbyists, and
helps set goals for performance.
-Ensures compliance with applicable federal and/or state laws, regulations, and/or City
rules, standards and guidelines, etc.
-Represents City interests on key legislative issues, task forces, committees, etc. and/or
drafts legislation, find sponsors, proposes amendments, etc.
-Ensures that legislation is implemented and followed.
-Works with both branches of City government and legislators if there are concerns in
implementation.
-Identify and prioritize system changes and improvements in legislative processes.
-Demonstrate and utilize knowledge and understanding of best practices in working with
the legislature.
-Supervise subordinate personnel including hiring, determining workload and delegating
assignments, training, monitoring and evaluating performance, and initiating corrective or
disciplinary actions.
-Gives recommendations to both branches of City government regarding implementation of
passed legislation.
-Tracks current events, legislation and other issues of interest to both branches of City
government.
-Other duties as assigned.
Qualifications:
-Sufficient education to demonstrate an aptitude to perform above and related duties; AND
minimum of six (6) years of progressively responsible experience directly related to
municipal government administration, and state and local legislative processes; OR An
equivalent combination of education and experience.
-Thorough knowledge of principles and practices of city government and legislative
processes; Utah laws, regulations, and guidelines governing all aspects of municipal
operations; legal and political issues affecting city operations and management.
-Considerable skill in the art of diplomacy and cooperative problem solving; establishing
and maintaining effective working relationships with state, federal, and other local
officials, elected officials and City residents.
-Ability to understand and interpret complex laws, rules, regulations, policies, and
guidelines; establish and maintain effective working relationships with employees, other
entities and the public; communicate effectively, verbally and in writing; implement
cooperative problem-solving processes.
-The ability to communicate information and ideas so others will understand, including the
ability to adapt communication.
-Collaborative with stakeholders and both branches of City government.
-The ability to think critically to help solve problems.
-The ability to tell when something is wrong or is likely to go wrong and help pull the right
people together to solve it.
-Experience working with diverse communities.
-Strong planning/project management skills.
Salt Lake City Corporation, Human Resources Department
Job Title: Finance Grant Analyst
Job Code Number: 002589 FLSA: Exempt
Pay Level: 27 EEO Code: 2
Bargaining Unit: 600 Benchmark: Research Analyst Grant Prog. Mgr.
JOB SUMMARY:
The Finance Grant Analyst will be under the general direction of the Deputy Director of Finance. The
Finance Grant Analyst will assist in the financial monitoring of multiple grants to ensure compliance
with city financial processes as well as state and federal grant requirements. ,
TYPICAL DUTIES:
Assist the Deputy Controller with Financial support for Housing grants. This includes, but limited to:
Working alongside other financial professionals.
Preparing calculations in Excel
Managing and approving payments through Workday
Reviewing, reconciling, and administering controls for grant funds
Analyzing, summarizing and/or reviewing data
Reporting findings, interpreting results and/or making recommendations
Collaborating with other team members
Work to ensure budgets and budget amendments are reconciled.
Assist in entering grants into Workday and managing the Workday Grants process.
Assist the Grant Manager with reporting and monitoring of grants. This includes, but not limited to:
Assisting the Housing Stability division with City contracts and processes.
Reviewing subrecipient contracts to ensure grant compliance.
Serves as a liaison to provide administrative and technical guidance.
Identifies, resolves, and ensures system compliance issues to follow State and Federal
regulations, as well as City policies, procedures, and ordinances.
Organizes and reviews grant files to ensure documentation is complete, maintained, and
retained for appropriate audit trails.
Prepares and presents reports for informational briefings and status updates.
Performs other duties as assigned.
MINIMUM OUALIFICATIONS:
1. B ch as accounting,
business or finance and four years of years in contract and/or grant experience. Education and
experience may be substituted on a year-for-year basis
2. Knowledge of finance and accounting theory, including generally accepted accounting principles.
3. Knowledge of administering and managing grants and contract policy, procedure, and guidelines
under City, State, and Federal laws and regulations.
4. Knowledge of 2 CFR 200 Federal grant regulations.
5. Ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing and build consensus with diverse
backgrounds, with varied organizational needs and differing priorities.
6. Ability to coordinate with and instruct others, as necessary, to ensure compliance and accuracy.
7. Ability to independently bring tasks and projects to meet successful and timely resolution.
8. May require minimum amounts of travel to and from meetings, trainings, and conferences.
9. Occasional non-traditional working hours, which may include evening and weekend meetings.
PREFERRED OUALIFICATIONS:
1. Experience in federal grant administration.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
1. Light physical effort, comfortable working conditions, handling of light weights, intermittent sitting,
standing and walking.
2. Considerable exposure to stressful situations as a result of report deadlines and human behavior.
Offers of employment are contingent on successful completion of a criminal background check
in accordance with City policy and applicable law. Criminal offenses will be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis and do not automatically disqualify a candidate from City employment.
The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by
persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities
and skills required of personnel so classified.
All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with
disabilities.
Position Review Information
Date: 10/28/2023
Departmental Approval: Mary Beth Thompson
HR Consultant Approval: Mike Sanchez
Compensation Approval: David Salazar
Notes: Update to minimum qualifications
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATESTREET
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKECITY, UTAH 84114-5455
ERINMENDENHALL
Mayor
MARY BETHTHOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
CITYCOUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________Date Received: _______________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: __________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: October 31, 2023
Darin Mano, Chair
FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:FY24 Budget Amendment #3
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT:Greg Cleary (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2024 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $0.00 $1,430,731.89
FLEET FUND $20,000.00 $20,000.00
CIP FUND $205,000.00 $205,000.00
IMPACT FEES FUND $0.00 $6,527,961.00
IMS FUND $12,000.00 $4,531,083.00
MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS FUND $1,705,700.79 $2,234,473.29
CDBG FUND $0.00 $46,642.50
TOTAL $1,942,700.79 $14,995,891.68
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2024 Budget Adjustments
The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2024.
Due to the timing of this budget amendment, there are no updates to the FY 2024 revenue
projections. Revenues are trending as expected are there are no reasons to assume any variance
to the initially adopted projections. The City has begun closing out the financials for Fiscal Year
2023, and will provide updates to Council as the audit progresses and is finalized.
The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes
included in Budget Amendment #3.
With the adoption of Budget Amendment #3, the available fund balance will adjust to 13.89 percent of the FY
2024 Adopted Budget.
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $1,942,700.79 in revenue and
$14,995,891.68 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in seven (7) funds, with an
increase of nine (9.0) FTEs. The proposal includes 28 initiatives for Council review.
A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration
requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2023
(Third amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2023-2024)
An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023 which adopted the
Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2023, and Ending
June 30, 2024.
In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2023, and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate any staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 29 of 2023.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate staffing changes
2
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2023 and ending June 30, 2024, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including any
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2023.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2023.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
___ _______
Jaysen Oldroyd
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Fire Department Single-Role Paramedics GF - 150,119.00 Ongoing 4.00
1 Fire Department Single-Role Paramedics GF - 10,400.00 One-time -
2 ARPA Employee Expenses Misc Grants - 14,225.00 One-time -
3 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division GF - 297,220.40 Ongoing 4.00
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division GF - 12,000.00 One-time -
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division IMS 12,000.00 12,000.00 One-time -
4 City Attorney's Office Legislative Division GF 20,000.00 One-time
5 Streets Impact Fee Funding for 2100 South
Reconstruction Project Impact Fees - 3,323,590.00 One-time -
6 Streets Impact Fee Funding for 600/700 North
Reconstruction Project Impact Fees - 3,204,371.00 One-time -
7 Access Control System Upgrade - Security GF - 400,000.00 One-time -
8 Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet GF - (20,000.00)One-time -
8 Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet GF - 20,000.00 One-time -
8 Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet Fleet 20,000.00 20,000.00 One-time -
9 Road Marking Maintenance GF - 200,000.00 Ongoing -
10 Paystation Replacement GF - 135,992.49 One-time -
11 Rail Spur Removal GF - 205,000.00 Ongoing -
11 Rail Spur Removal CIP 205,000.00 205,000.00 One-time -
12 Temporary Shelter Community Misc Grants - 500,000.00 One-time -
13 Grant Employee - Finance - 6 Months @ 75%CDBG Grants - 43,642.50 Ongoing 0.75
13 Grant Employee - Finance - 6 Months @ 25%Misc Grants - 14,547.50 Ongoing 0.25
13 Grant Employee - Finance - One-time Costs CDBG Grants - 3,000.00 One-time -
14 Consulting for the Enterprise Billing Systems IMS - 250,000.00 One-time -
1
Move Funding for Downtown Central Precinct Tenant
Improvements for North Temple Substation and
Downtown Central Project
GF - (513,208.00)One-time -
1
Move Funding for Downtown Central Precinct Tenant
Improvements for North Temple Substation and
Downtown Central Project
GF - 513,208.00 One-time -
2 IMS FY 2023 Encumbrance Roll Forward IMS - 4,269,083.00 One-time -
3 Move Cultural Core Funding to Non-Departmental
from Arts Council Cost Center GF (250,000.00)One-time -
3 Move Cultural Core Funding to Non-Departmental
from Arts Council Cost Center GF 250,000.00 One-time -
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
-
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section A: New Items
Section D: Housekeeping
Section F: Donations
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Consent Agenda #2
1 Utah Department of Natural Resources/Forestry Misc Grants 200,000.00 200,000.00 One-time -
2 Department of Workforce Services Know Your Neighbor Misc Grants 100,000.00 100,000.00 One-time -
3 EPA Salt Lake City Schovaers Cleanup Misc Grants 495,200.00 495,200.00 One-time -
4 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG Grant)Misc Grants 38,000.00 38,000.00 One-time -
5 Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) SLCPD Victim Advocates Misc Grants 346,131.80 346,131.80 One-time -
6 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG)Misc Grants 386,620.00 386,620.00 One-time -
7 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Rosewood Park Misc Grants 29,507.51 29,507.51 One-time -
8 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Riverside Park Misc Grants 20,517.38 20,517.38 One-time -
9 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Regional Athletic
Complex Misc Grants 12,881.77 12,881.77 One-time -
10 Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Day Riverside Library Misc Grants 22,642.33 22,642.33 One-time -
11 FEMA Power Poles Cameras Misc Grants 39,200.00 39,200.00 One-time -
12 Utah Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Misc Grants 15,000.00 15,000.00 One-time -
Total of Budget Amendment
Items
1,942,700.79 14,995,891.68 - - 9.00
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1:
General Fund GF - 1,430,731.89 - - 8.00
Fleet Fund Fleet 20,000.00 20,000.00 - - -
CIP Fund CIP 205,000.00 205,000.00 - - -
Impact Fees Fund Impact Fees - 6,527,961.00
IMS Fund IMS 12,000.00 4,531,083.00 - - -
Miscellaneous Grants Misc Grants 1,705,700.79 2,234,473.29 - - 0.25
CDBG Operating Fund CDBG Grants - 46,642.50 - - 0.75
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,942,700.79 14,995,891.68 - - 9.00
Administration Proposed Council Approved
Section I: Council Added Items
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
2
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2023-24 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
Revenue FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
- Revenue BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue
General Fund (Fund 1000)448,514,918 0.00 - 448,514,918.00
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 - 0.00 1,700,000.00
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)4,681,185 4,681,185.00
Water Fund (FC 51)176,637,288 176,637,288.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)289,941,178 289,941,178.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)19,865,892 19,865,892.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)403,513,000 403,513,000.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)25,240,459 25,240,459.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)12,710,067 12,710,067.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,925,000 3,925,000.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,108,969 36,800.00 20,000.00 32,165,769.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)36,254,357 9,000.00 6,000.00 12,000.00 36,281,357.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 - 5,597,763.00
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 1,705,700.79 26,823,040.79
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 62,416.00 462,416.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)14,659,043 14,659,043.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)32,341,586 32,341,586.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)30,199,756 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 205,000.00 56,108,649.25
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,888,581 3,888,581.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)60,932,137 60,932,137.00
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,623,631,451 263,800.00 41,751,732.25 1,942,700.79 - - 1,667,589,684.04
3
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Expenditure FY 2023-24 Adopted
Budgetg - Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense
General Fund (FC 10)448,514,918 204,200.00 (763,950.00)1,430,731.89 449,385,899.89
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000.00
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,397,355 1,397,355.00
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,700,000 664,293.70 2,364,293.70
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)6,044,119 6,044,119.00
Water Fund (FC 51)177,953,787 177,953,787.00
Sewer Fund (FC 52)301,832,622 301,832,622.00
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)22,947,474 22,947,474.00
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)520,438,997 520,438,997.00
Refuse Fund (FC 57)28,263,792 28,263,792.00
Golf Fund (FC 59)17,938,984 17,938,984.00
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,800,385 3,800,385.00
Fleet Fund (FC 61)32,498,750 14,461,793.00 20,000.00 46,980,543.00
IMS Fund (FC 65)38,702,171 9,000.00 6,000.00 4,531,083.00 43,248,254.00
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)9,700,000 9,700,000.00
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)5,597,763 46,642.50 5,644,405.50
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,919,917 16,197,423.00 2,234,473.29 27,351,813.29
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)400,000 65,472.00 465,472.00
Donation Fund (FC 77)500,000 500,000.00
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)10,212,043 10,212,043.00
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)34,894,979 6,732,961.00 41,627,940.00
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)29,708,286 218,000.00 25,485,893.25 55,412,179.25
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)3,370,012 3,370,012.00
Risk Fund (FC 87)63,574,655 63,574,655.00
- Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,768,914,009 14,892,993.00 41,655,131.95 14,995,891.68 - - 1,840,458,025.63
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
Contingent Appropriation
4
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Fire Department Medical Response Paramedics GF $150,119.00
GF $10,400.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Chief Karl Lieb / Clint
Rasmussen
For questions, please include Chief Lieb, Clint Rasmussen, Greg Cleary and Mary Beth Thompson
Current Status
The Salt Lake City Fire Department (SLCFD) currently operates three Medical Response Teams (MRTs) with another
funded at the Salt Lake City Airport beginning in January of 2024 for a total of four MRTs. Each MRT is comprised of 4
Firefighters (FFs), for a total of 16 FFs allocated and funded for the MRT program. All FFs currently allocated to the MRT
are Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs). By staffing a MRT with 3 EMTs and 1 Paramedic, rather than 4 EMTS, the
response capability would increase by
Replacing one of the EMTs as a Paramedic (Advanced Life Support or ALS) would increase the capability of the MRTs by
approximately 30% and allow them to perform more advanced patient assessments.
Paramedics are currently at a premium nationwide. Fortunately, SLCFD trains and remains appropriately staffed with
Paramedics on our Medic Engines (4-handed) for our optimal response model - two Paramedics on each of eight daily
Medic (ALS) Engines within SLC. These Medic Engines respond to the most serious medical and fire calls and should
remain staffed in this configuration as a 4-handed unit for maximum capability.
Proposal
This item it to establish 4 new FTEs (Medical Response Paramedics) and reclassify 4 existing FTEs (Firefighters) to
Medical Response Paramedics.
The SLCFD proposes to diversify our current MRT model by replacing and displacing a total of eight (8) MRT FF EMTs
with Medical Response Paramedics (SRPs). This would ideally staff one (1) Paramedic on each unit of four daily operating
MRTs.
The transition would expand the current MRTs response capability with an ALS component while maintaining the integrity
of the MRT as a FD resource responding from and residing within select SLCFD fire stations.
The SRPs would be civilian, potentially sworn, and eligible to participate in the Firefighters or Tier 2 Public
Safety/Firefighter retirement systems.
The SRPs would participate in a training regimen developed by the SLCFD for their specific role within our EMS response
Process
The SLCFD would realize eight (8) Medical Response Paramedics through a combination of additional FTEs and
conversion of existing FTEs:
1. SLCFD is requesting four (4) additional FTEs in the form of Medical Response Paramedics at a half-year cost $150,119
plus some start-up costs of $10,400. Full year funding for FY25 would be an additional budget increase of $142,519. No
January 2024.
2. SLCFD would retain the option to convert four (4) existing vacant FF positions currently funded for the MRT to SRPs by
the end of calendar year 2023.
3. The remaining four FFs displaced by the four requested SRPs would be utilized to fill 4-handed vacancies or additional
resources throughout Salt Lake City in an effort to reduce OT and consistently staff SLCFD heavy apparatus.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
A-2: ARPA Employee Expenses Misc. Grants $14,225.00
Department: Finance & Economic Development Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson
Funding in the amount of $14,225.00 is being requested to cover expenses for one grant employee for the remainder of the
Fiscal Year. Throughout the year, staffing levels have been in flux to support this ongoing need. The additional amount will
sufficiently cover the personnel expenses, factoring in vacancies saving
ARPA grant activity.
A-3: Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal
A-4: GF $297,220.40
GF $12,000.00
IMS $12,000.00
GF $20,000.00
Department: City Attorney Prepared By: Katherine Lewis
For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary, Katie Lewis
This funding is to establish and support four (4) new FTEs, creating the Legislative
office. The primary focus of this division will be on legislative affairs, with special focus on the legislative session and the
various impacts to Salt Lake City. The proposed funding in the amount of $297,220.40 assumes the positions to be filled
for six-months in Fiscal Year 2024, with a hire date in January. The four (4) positions are to be ongoing, with a financial
impact of $594,440.79 annually beginning if FY25. The four proposed positions are as follows:
Legislative Affairs Director (E34)
Senior City Attorney (E39)
Special Projects Analyst (E26)
Administrative Assistant (N21)
The supporting Ordinance:
Establishes that because the City Attorney manages the legal affairs of both the executive and legislative branches
of government, she reports to both the Mayor and Council chair, and can be removed at the discretion of the
Mayor.
Clarifies that the City A
Legislative Affairs.
Clarifies that the City Attorney may retain outside counsel on behalf of the City, if she concludes that the City
terest, is unable, or is unavailable to perform that legal work for the City.
Creates the Division of Legislative Affairs, which will be responsible for monitoring state and federal legislation
and engaging in advocacy, collaboration, and tracking of all legislative matters for the City.
legislative agenda, and will report to both branches of government on legislative priorities and policies.
This initial funding request accounts for one-time expenses for staff equipment such as computers ($12,000), funding via a
Non Departmental Transfer ($12,000), and a tenant improvement to established workspaces and necessary equipment
($20,000).
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
A-5: Streets Impact Fee Funding for 2100 South
Reconstruction Project
Impact Fees $3,323,590.00
Department: Public Services Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stevens
For questions, please include Mark Stevens, Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith, Jorge Chamorro
Engineering and Transportation are requesting a budget amendment to increase the appropriation of Streets Impact Fees
for the 2100 South Reconstruction Project. Multiple departments (Engineering, Transportation, the Finance Capital Asset
Planning Team, and the Office of the City Attorney) have conducted an analysis of the 2100 South Reconstruction Project,
and based on the increase in overall cost and the increase in the portion of the project related to Complete Streets, this
project is eligible for an additional $3,323,590 of Streets Impact Fees.
A-6: Streets Impact Fee Funding for 600/700 North
Reconstruction Project
Impact Fees $3,204,371.00
Department: Public Services Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stevens
For questions, please include Mark Stevens, Mike Atkinson, Jordan Smith, Jorge Chamorro
Engineering and Transportation are requesting a budget amendment to increase the appropriation of Streets Impact Fees
for the 600 North/ 700 North Reconstruction Project. Multiple departments (Engineering, Transportation, the Finance
Capital Asset Planning Team, and the Office of the City Attorney) have conducted an analysis of the 600 North/ 700 North
Reconstruction Project, and based on the increase in overall cost and the increase in the portion of the project related to
Complete Streets, this project is eligible for an additional $3,204,371 of Streets Impact Fees.
A-7: Access Control System Upgrade Security GF $400,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro
For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro
The current access control system and devices across City buildings are now considered outdated and vulnerable, and staff
are proposing this be addressed before the system fails. This system is used for access badges issued to all City employees
to scan at certain doors to gain access to a given space. The Safety and Security Program proposes continuing the transition
to the S2 control access system as a City-wide standard.
With the recent allocation of funding from Council, the Public Safety Building and City Hall have upgraded their back-end
software. The funding requested for the next phase should transition Plaza 349 and the Justice Courts. Additionally, access
cards and card readers will be purchased for all four buildings. This project scope has been developed with staff from
various departments, including IMS, to ensure standards and needs are met. The estimated cost for this project is
$400,000.
A-8: Compliance Electric Vehicle Funds Transfer to Fleet GF ($20,000.00)
GF $20,000.00
Fleet $20,000.00
Department: Public Services Compliance
Crookston
Nancy Bean, Denise Sorensen
Public Services - Compliance is requesting a transfer of $20,000 to the Fleet Replacement Fund helping cover the
difference in cost to purchase two electric trucks instead of the originally funded smaller vehicles.
Fleet has been presented with an opportunity to order these electric trucks. One of the vehicles is part of the replacement
cycle, upgrading the originally intended vehicle to a more capable one, and will allow for Parking Enforcement operations
to continue during winter snow events, especially in areas like the Avenues. Additionally, the extra cargo space is needed to
transport equipment such as pay station kiosks and equipment as needed. In addition to these advantages, the second
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
4
vehicle will provide adequate space to transport three (3) mitigation officers (FTEs recently approved) and their supplies
for our Long-Term Parking Mitigation Team. The addition of these 2 EVs will bring Compliance closer to their goal to have
a 100% electric fleet.
A-9: Road Marking Maintenance GF $200,000.00
Department: Public Services Streets Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro
For question, please include Jorge Chamorro
Over the past few years the Transportation Division has been successful in obtaining funding for special road markings
through the CIP process, which include green paint on certain bike lanes.
After assessing the current inventory of assets made up of 1010 bike racks and 3.23 miles of green-painted bike lanes and
markings, staff has concluded that this ongoing maintenance need should no longer rely on the CIP process but rather be
added to the Streets operating budget. At this time the need does not justify upfront cost of equipment procurement,
Streets will develop a maintenance schedule and oversee a contract to perform the necessary maintenance work. If funding
is approved for this item, though most of the work would not occur in the winter, contract development and work
scheduling could be done in the meantime with work happening as weather allows.
The Streets Division is requesting $200,000 to be added to their budget for ongoing maintenance of road markings and
assets recently inventoried.
A-10: Pay Station Replacement GF $135,992.49
Department: Public Services/Finance
The current pay stations were purchased over 10 years ago. Due to their age, they are past the end of their useful life and at
risk of failure. New pay stations will allow the City to modernize the services offered to end users. The new pay stations
will provide more features for the public including parking payment, information sharing about events going on city wide,
the capability to pay by license plate technology, potential pollution sensors, and other innovative features. The
modernization of the pay stations will allow for smoother staff operations and continued service to end users. City Finance
is recommending a 7-year amortization rather than using the General Fund for one-time payment.
The amortization schedule is attached and includes a 7-year payment schedule, with $135,992.49 due in Year 1, and
$271,984.98 due in years two (2) through year seven (7). This includes an interest rate of 4.60%. The Council may consider
a 5-year schedule which is also attached, with an interest rate of 4.77%.
This item is being brought forward with Budget Amendment 3 due to the Request for Proposal process and market
conditions around equipment. At the time of budget development, staff did not have clear insight into the cost or timeline
of pay station procurement and delivery. Following the completion of the RFP process, staff feel it is best to proceed with
the selected vendor for the reasons outlined above.
A-11: Rail Spur Removal GF $205,000.00
CIP $205,000.00
Department: Public Services Engineering Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro / JP Goates
For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro and JP Goates
Housekeeping request to move $205,000, approved by Council on BA#1 of FY23, item A-7, but placed on a GF cost center,
and were recaptured at the end of FY23, from Fund Balance to a Capital Project Cost Center for Engineering to initiate the
project.
An overview of the original request is below.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
5
The property on which this rail spur is located, 535 S. 600 W., was conveyed in 1997 by the City to a private party, with
partial consideration for this conveyance being an easement to construct, operate, and maintain a railroad spur and
associated facilities. Pursuant to an Amended and Restated Easement and Boundary Line Agreement, executed on July 3,
2000, the easement shall terminate if the City ceases to use the rail spur for more than one year, and that the City shall
contractually obligated to remove it.
A-12: Temporary Shelter Community (Sanctioned Camping) Misc. Grants $500,000
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Greg Cleary/Shellie
Dietrich
Staff is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $500,000 to support startup costs associated with city efforts
around a Temporary Shelter Community or Sanctioned Camping. This funding will allow staff to roll out the program, with
ongoing assessment in needs, service levels, and funding being further developed in the coming months.
Specifically, the $500,000 will support the Police Departments role in this effort, with overtime staffing of offers at the
temporary shelters. In addition to the program, the most effective and efficient police staffing levels will also be assessed.
The Police Department will look to savings in other areas of the budget to help support the program, notably with the
savings realized with any vacant positions. Staff will return to council in the coming months with additional funding
requests as needed, and once there is better data and information available on what the program is to entail and what
might be needed to fund the ongoing efforts. Attached to this item is an ARPA financial reconciliation.
A-13: New Financial Grant Analyst Housing Stability
Program Support
CDBG Grants $46,642.50
Misc. Grants $14,547.50
Department: CAN Prepared By:
This request is for funding to support one FTE for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2024, which is intended to oversee the
grant allocation from the ARPA program, supporting the Housing Stability Program. The proposed Finance Grant Analyst
will work under the direction of the Deputy Director of Finance and will assist in the financial monitoring of multiple
grants to ensure compliance with city financial processes as well as state and federal grant requirements. The position will
be split across two grant funding sources 75% CDBG and 25% Misc. Grants. A job description for this position is
attached.
A-14: Consulting for Enterprise Billing Systems IMS $250,000.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony / Gloria
Cortes
This item provides funding for consulting services for the Enterprise Billing systems for PUBS which is primarily used by
Sustainability and Public Utilities. PUBS needs to be replaced or upgraded, and the consultant work includes an analysis of
the city's needs and compare that to best practices and make a recommendation on where the city should be moving with
regards to future decisions. Microsoft has current solution mapped at the end of life by FY2025. Therefore, staff
are initiating the work to finding a solution in the current year have an adequate platform it in place by the beginning of
FY2025.
The proposal and expenses will be paid for by the annual allocation that IMS uses to collect its revenue on an annual basis
and is estimated based on 1,000 hours of work, at $250 per hour.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
6
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Moving Funding for Downtown Central Precinct Tenant
Improvements for North Temple Substation and Downtown
Central Project
GF ($513,208.00)
GF $513,208.00
Department: CAN Prepared By: Brent Beck
For question, please include Brent Beck, Blake Thomas, Tammy Hunsaker, JP Goates
Funding for the Downtown Central Precinct Tenant Improvements for North Temple Sub Station and Downtown Central
Project in the amount of $513,208 was added by the Council to the CAN budget during the budget decision making
process. However, this funding should have gone to Public Services since it will be the Facilities division that will be
managing the improvements. This item does not allocate any additional funding, but simply moves funding from one
department to another for the same work.
D-2: IMS FY 2023 Encumbrance Roll Forward IMS $4,269,083.00
Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony / Gloria
Cortes
For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortes, Aaron Bentley
IMS has encumbered money that was expected to be paid out of the FY23 funds and either will need to be paid, or has
already been paid in FY24. These encumbrances are listed in the Carry Over Encumbrance reports. All of these items have
been approved for purchase by central finance in a prior year. These expenses will be paid for by the annual allocation that
IMS uses to collect it's revenue on an annual basis.
D-3: Move Cultural Core Funding to Non-Departmental from
Arts Council Cost Center GF ($250,000.00)
GF $250,000.00
Department: Non-Departmental, Economic Development Prepared By: Greg Cleary
For questions, please include: Mary Beth Thompson, Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Felicia Baca
This item is to move funds from Non-Departmental budget. This
is an effort to align funding with the appropriate cost center within the new financial system.
Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources
Section F: Donations
Section G: Consent Agenda
Consent Agenda
G-1: Utah Department of Natural Resources/Forestry Misc. Grants $200,000.00
Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL) has awarded Salt Lake City $200,000 for the purposes of removing
navigational hazards, including downed trees, garbage, and other debris from the Jordan River from 2100 South to 2400
North. This funding will provide for safer conditions on the river channel for recreational boaters.
Public hearing was held on September 19, 2023
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
7
No match is required.
G-2: Department of Workforce Services-- Know Your
Neighbor Misc. Grants $100,000.00
Department: Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
DWS is extending the Salt Lake City's Know Your Neighbor contract. The original contract was for $100,000 to pay for the
salary and benefits of a full-time volunteer coordinator from October 1, 2022, to September 30,2023. The extension will
include an increase of $100,000 to extend the period for one year starting October 1, 2023, and ending September 30,
2024. Thus, making the total amount of the contract $200,000. This is a refugee volunteer program that runs through the
office. This program benefits refugee clients as well as people from the larger community who volunteer to help.
Public Hearing will be held November 7, 2023
No Match is required.
G-3: EPA Salt Lake City Schovaers Electronics Cleanup Misc. Grants $495,200.00
Department: RDA Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This is one of two Brownfields grants awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Salt Lake City area for
the purpose of cleaning up land of hazardous substances, pollutant or contaminants for the revitalization of the
properties. These grants are part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). This grant has been awarded to
Salt Lake City in the amount of $495,200 to conduct remediation activities at the former Schovaers site (22 South Jeremy
Street) in Salt Lake City. A second grant for $1 million was awarded to Salt Lake County for the assessment and cleanup
projects in Magna Township.
Public hearing was held on December 13, 2022
No Match is required.
G-4: Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Misc. Grants $38,000.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) provides state, local, tribal and territorial emergency
management agencies with the resources required for implementation of the National Preparedness System and works
toward the National Preparedness Goal of a secure and resilient nation. This is the annual allocation from the state and will
be used to support Emergency Management functions and programs.
A public hearing was held on May 16, 2023.
A 50% match is required.
G-5: Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) - SLCPD Victim Advocates Misc Grants $346,131.80
Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Salt Lake City Police Department is requesting continuation funding for our SLCPD VOCA grant funded Victim
Advocate positions. Additionally, there are emergency funds for assisting victims included in the application.
The grant will continue to fund 2.69 existing FTEs and includes emergency funds that will be used to help victims. This is a
two-year grant. The period of performance starts July 1, 2023, and ends June 30,2025.
Public hearing will be on November 7, 2023.
No match is required.
G-6: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG) Misc. Grants $386,620.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
8
The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) allows states and local governments to support a
broad range of activities to prevent and control crime and to improve the criminal justice system, some of which could have
environmental impacts.
The Salt Lake City Police Department will use this money for the following:
Professional Travel Training for Sworn and Civilian Staff - $40,125
Pole Cameras - $20,000
High Speed License Plate Recognition (+Accessories) - $22,970
Climbing Equipment - $20,160
Night Vision Goggles and Mounts - $49,098
Optics - $11,192
Ballistic Rated Windshields - $19,500
Surveillance Trailer Maintenance and Replacement - $14,000
K9 GPS and Narcotics Enforcement Supplies - $6,132
Community Policing and Targeted Enforcement Overtime - $76,100
Subaward to Salt Lake County (BJA allocation) - $53,672
Subaward to Unified Police Department (BJA allocation) - $53,671
No new staff members are proposed as part of this item.
A public hearing was held on September 19, 2023.
No match is required.
G-7: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Rosewood Park Misc. Grants $29,507.51
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports necessary infrastructure for the installation of one (1) approved dual port charger at Rosewood Park,
located at 1400 North 1200 West in Salt Lake City. This charger will be available to the public 24/7. There is no cost related
to the charger in this incentive. Accepting the incentive payment obligates the participant to maintain functioning chargers
and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years, starting from the date of the incentive payment.
The maintenance cost of this item is the lesser of the following: $29,507.51 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023
No match is required.
G-8: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready
Riverside Park Misc. Grants $20,517.38
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports necessary infrastructure for the installation of one (1) dual port AC Level 2 charger at Riverside Park,
located at 1450 West Leadville Avenue in Salt Lake City. This charger will be available to the public 24/7. There is no cost
related to the charger in this incentive. Accepting the incentive payment obligates the participant to maintain functioning
chargers and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years, starting from the date of the incentive payment. No new
staff positions.
The maintenance cost of this item is lesser of the following: $20,517.38 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023.
No match is required.
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
9
G-9: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Regional Athletic
Complex Misc. Grants $12,881.77
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports the necessary infrastructure for the installation of one (1) approved dual port AC Level 2 charger at the
Regional Athletic Complex, located at 2080 Rose Park Lane in Salt Lake City. This charger will be available to the public
24/7. There is no cost related to the charger in this incentive. Accepting the incentive payment obligates the participant to
maintain functioning chargers and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years, starting from the date of the
incentive payment. No new staff members.
The maintenance cost of this item is the lesser of the following: $12,881.77 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023.
No match is required.
G-10: Rocky Mountain Power Make Ready Day Riverside
Library Misc. Grants $22,642.33
Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
This item supports the necessary infrastructure for the installation of two (2) approved dual port AC Level 2 chargers at the
Day Riverside Library, located at 1575 West 1000 North in Salt Lake City. The project will result in a total of four (4) char ging
ports. The chargers will be available to the public 24/7. There is no cost related to the in this incentive. Accepting the incentive
payment obligates the participant to maintain functioning chargers and allow public access 24/7 for a minimum of five years,
starting from the date of the incentive payment. No new staff members.
The maintenance cost of this item is the lesser of the following: $22,642.33 or 80% of the total project cost.
A public hearing was held on July 18, 2023.
No match is required.
G-11: FEMA Power Poles Cameras Misc. Grants $39,200.00
Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
FEMA is providing funding to the Fire Department for the temporary installation of cameras onto existing powers poles as
needed.
A public hearing was held May 16, 2023.
No match is required.
G-12: Utah Crimes Against Children Task Force Misc. Grants $15,000.00
Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) has created the Utah Internet Crimes Against Children
(ICAC) Task Force Program, which is a national network of state and local law enforcement cybercrime units. The national
ICAC program assists state and local law enforcement agencies to develop an effective response to cyber enticement, sexual
exploitation of a minor, and other child sexual abuse material cases. The Police Department will utilize this funding to
support its ongoing efforts to protect children from cybercrime.
Public Hearing was held on August 15, 2023.
No match is required.
Section I: Council Added Items
Salt Lake City FY 2023-24 Budget Amendment #3
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
10
Impact Fees - Summary Confidential
Data pulled 07/20/2023
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 1,402,656$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 273,684$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 16,793,487$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 6,304,485$ D
24,774,312$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202207 (Jul2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202208 (Aug2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202209 (Sep2022)2023Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202210 (Oct2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202211 (Nov2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202212 (Dec2022)2023Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202301 (Jan2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202302 (Feb2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202303 (Mar2023)2023Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202304 (Apr2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202305 (May2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202306 (Jun2023)2023Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month
202307 (Jul2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202308 (Aug2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202309 (Sep2023)2024Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202310 (Oct2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202311 (Nov2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202312 (Dec2023)2024Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202401 (Jan2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202402 (Feb2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202403 (Mar2024)2024Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202404 (Apr2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202405 (May2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202406 (Jun2024)2024Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202407 (Jul2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202408 (Aug2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202409 (Sep2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202410 (Oct2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202411 (Nov2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202412 (Dec2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202501 (Jan2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202502 (Feb2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202503 (Mar2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202504 (Apr2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202505 (May2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202506 (Jun2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202507 (Jul2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202508 (Aug2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202509 (Sep2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202510 (Oct2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202511 (Nov2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 1,103,628$ 1,103,628$
202512 (Dec2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ 113,748$ 113,748$
202601 (Jan2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 3,960$ 3,960$
202602 (Feb2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 26,929$ 26,929$
202603 (Mar2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ 95,407$ 95,407$
202604 (Apr2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 1,065,383$ 1,065,383$
202605 (May2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 95,762$ 95,762$
202606 (Jun2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ 53,972$ 53,972$
Total, Currently Expiring through Jun 2026 -$ -$ -$ 2,558,788$ 2,558,788$
FY
2
0
2
3
Calendar
Month
FY
2
0
2
4
FY
2
0
2
5
FY
2
0
2
6
Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 07/20/2023 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Police Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Police Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Police Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Police Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
IFFP Contract - Police 8423003 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$
Grand Total 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$
A
Fire
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Fire Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Fire Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Fire Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Fire Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Fire Training Center 8417015 (499,533)$ -$ (499,533)$ -$
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ -$ 58.00
IFFP Contract - Fire 8423004 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$ B
IF Excess Capacity - Fire 8423006 2,200,000$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$
Grand Total 1,712,546$ 3,021$ 1,700,467$ 9,058.00
Parks
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Parks Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Parks Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Parks Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Parks Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 261,187$ -$ 261,187$ -$
Emigration Open Space ACQ 8422423 700,000$ -$ 700,000$ -$
Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 16,959$ 1,705$ 15,254$ -$
JR Boat Ram 8420144 3,337$ -$ 3,337$ -$
RAC Parcel Acquisition 8423454 395,442$ -$ 395,442$ 0$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ -$ 42$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,262$ 23,000$ -$ 262$
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$
9line park 8416005 16,495$ 855$ 13,968$ 1,672$
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$
Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ 4,328$ -$ 8,103$
FY IFFP Contract - Parks 8423005 9,000$ -$ -$ 9,000$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$
9Line Orchard 8420136 156,827$ 132,168$ 6,874$ 17,785$
Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 275,000$ -$ 253,170$ 21,830$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,042,694$ 240,179$ 764,614$ 37,902$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 56,109$ -$ 1,302$ 54,808$
Green loop 200 E Design 8422408 608,490$ 443,065$ 93,673$ 71,752$ C
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 156,565$ 44,791$ 30,676$ 81,099$
Fisher House Exploration Ctr 8421401 555,030$ 52,760$ 402,270$ 100,000$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 254,159$ 133,125$ 13,640$ 107,393$
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 122,281$ -$ 1,310$ 120,971$
Three Creeks West Bank NewPark 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$
Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 160,819$ -$ 2,781$ 158,038$
Historic Renovation AllenParK 8422410 420,000$ 156,146$ 104,230$ 159,624$
RAC Playground with ShadeSails 8422415 179,323$ -$ 712$ 178,611$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 266,306$ 10,285$ 4,262$ 251,758$
900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 287,848$ -$ -$ 287,848$
Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 300,000$ -$ 678$ 299,322$
Open Space Prop Acq-Trails 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$
SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ -$ 319,139$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 428,074$ 5,593$ 23,690$ 398,791$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 446,825$ 18,467$ 14,885$ 413,472$
Open Space Prop Acq-City Parks 8423452 450,000$ -$ -$ 450,000$
Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 510,000$ 9,440$ 34,921$ 465,638$
Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 499,563$ -$ 106$ 499,457$
RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$
Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 867,962$ -$ 2,906$ 865,056$
Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 1,000,000$ -$ 3,096$ 996,905$
SLCFoothillsTrailheadDevelpmnt 8422412 1,304,682$ 41,620$ 62,596$ 1,200,466$
GlendaleWtrprk MstrPln&Rehab 8422406 3,177,849$ 524,018$ 930,050$ 1,723,781$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,149,123$ 69,208$ 94,451$ 2,985,464$
Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000$ -$ -$ 4,350,000$
Grand Total 24,106,716$ 1,913,351$ 4,236,078$ 17,957,287$
Streets
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Description Cost Center
Sum of Street Allocation
Budget Amended
Sum of Street Allocation
Encumbrances
Sum of Street Allocation YTD
Expenditures
Sum of Street Allocation
Remaining Appropriation
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 1,292$ -$ 1,292$ -$
500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 15,026$ 11,703$ 3,323$ -$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 13,473$ -$ 13,473$ -$
900 S Signal Improvements IF 8422615 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$
Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ 25,398$ -$ -$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ -$ 13,000$ -$
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 63,955$ -$ 63,955$ -$
Local Link Construction IF 8422606 50,000$ -$ 50,000$ -$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,109$ 12,925$ 940$ 2,244$
Transportatn Safety Imprvmt IF 8422620 44,400$ -$ 38,084$ 6,316$
Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 35,392$ -$ 16,693$ 18,699$
500 to 700 S 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ D
900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ -$ 28,000$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 58,780$ 17,300$ 11,746$ 29,734$
1700S Corridor Transfrmtn IF 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$
200S TransitCmpltStrtSuppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ -$ 37,422$
300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$
Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$
Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 110,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 281,586$ 124,068$ 40,300$ 117,218$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 181,846$ -$ 542$ 181,303$
200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 252,000$ -$ -$ 252,000$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 780,182$ 46,269$ 393,884$ 340,029$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 836,736$ 55,846$ 45,972$ 734,918$
700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 1,120,000$ -$ 166$ 1,119,834$
1300 East Reconstruction 8423625 3,111,335$ 1,192,649$ 224,557$ 1,694,129$
Grand Total 8,267,218$ 1,503,600$ 987,926$ 5,775,692$
Total 34,095,480$ 3,419,972$ 6,924,471$ 23,751,037$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
8484002
24,774,312$
8484003
8484005
16,793,487$
6,304,485$
$273,684
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
8484001
1,402,656$
RESOLUTION NO. _____ OF 2023
(Requesting Admission to the Firefighters Retirement System)
WHEREAS, Utah Code Sections 49-23-101 et seq. authorize an employer of emergency
medical service personnel to elect to include such personnel in the Tier 2 Firefighter Retirement
system with the Utah Retirement System; and
WHEREAS, employers of full time emergency medical service personnel including
paramedics for interfacility transport, including Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”), are
authorized to elect to include such personnel in the Tier 2 Firefighter Retirement system with the
Utah Retirement System; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to provide benefits authorized by Utah state law for
the public safety personnel by the City; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council of Salt Lake City (“City Council”) to
exercise the election authorized by statute to approve and authorize coverage under the Fighters
Retirement Systems for City firefighter and emergency medical services personnel, including the
City’s social workers who provide emergency response services.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1.Election and Authorization. The City Council hereby elects to cover the City’s
emergency service personnel, also including the City’s social workers who provide emergency
response services, who can be qualified for such coverage pursuant to Utah Code Sections 49-23-
101 et seq. in the Tier 2 Firefighter Retirement System with the Utah Retirement System. The
Mayor is hereby authorized to undertake all of the necessary actions to enroll the City in the benefit
programs of the Firefighters Retirement Systems offered by Utah Retirement Systems, including
the retirement coverage and death benefit coverage for qualified employees under the laws and
regulation of the Utah Retirement Systems.
2.Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon passage.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _________, 2023.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
____________________________
CITY RECORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
______________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney
Date: ______October 9, 2023________
Medical Response Paramedic
Job Profile Summary Under the supervision of a Fire Department Officer and the direction of emergency room medical
personnel, and in compliance with Utah State and Fire Department operating procedures, provides basic
and advanced life support and medical care to victims of sudden illness and accident, at the emergency
scene, and during transport to an appropriate medical facility. This is a specialized work performed in
accordance with National and Salt Lake City Fire Department performance and training standards.
Job Description
TYPICAL DUTIES:
• Responds to medical emergencies in fire department vehicle with EMT partner. Examines
patient at emergency scene and establishes priorities for treatment. Communicates with
appropriate hospital emergency room. Provides all treatment according to orders from
hospital staff or standing orders, including ECG monitoring, administering IV fluids and
medications, defibrillation intubation, splinting and bandaging, extraction, and other
treatments necessary for stabilization of patients prior to arrival at emergency room. May
transport patients with assistance from contracted ambulance company.
• Performs daily medical equipment checks, cleans, and makes equipment used at medical
scene serviceable after each call. Keeps record of each medical emergency and patient on
forms provided by Utah State Division of Health. Maintains company medical logbook.
• Responds to other emergencies with assigned partner as dispatched, carries out orders of
company/division officer and other activities necessary for handling an emergency. Acts to
maintain safety for self and other members of the team.
• Participates in drills and classes as provided by the department or company officer.
Participates in physical fitness training. Demonstrates medical skills as required by
appropriate authority. Fulfills paramedic certification requirements as established by the
State of Utah. Conducts periodic medical training for members as assigned.
• Complies with city and department policies and procedures. Completes daily job
assignments from company officer to maintain fire station, grounds, and equipment in
clean and serviceable condition. Meets with company officer to assess job performance.
• Maintains the ability to perform medical activities and participates in all functions
required of a paramedic on the Salt Lake City Fire Department.
• Performs other duties as required.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:
• Successful completion of paramedic training and maintenance of certification and licensure
as a Utah State Paramedic, including CME attendance and all required testing. Such
certification must be in good standing at all times.
• Must satisfy the medical condition requirements of National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) Standard 1582.
• Possession of valid driver license.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
• Considerable exposure to stressful situations as a result of human behavior while
responding to emergency and non-emergency situations.
Medical Response Paramedic
• Moderately heavy physical activity. Required to stand, walk, or sit uncomfortably for
extended periods. Exposure to disagreeable elements such as cold, dampness, toxic
fumes, smoke, and noise. Intermittent exposure to infectious diseases, emotionally upset
patient, and relatives. Frequent exposure to extreme weather conditions.
• May be subjected to lifting weights of 50 pounds or more, aroused out of sleep by fire alarm
gongs. Subjected to rapid changes in temperature by responding from station facilities to
outside temperatures. May be required during prolonged emergency operations to work
without sleep for extended periods. Subjected to traffic hazards during emergency
responses through city traffic.
The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by
persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities
and skills required of personnel so classified.
All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with
disabilities.
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ___ of 2023
(Division of Legislative Affairs and City Attorney Reporting)
An ordinance amending chapter 2.08.040 of the Salt Lake City Code to add a division of
legislative affairs to the Department of the City Attorney and to clarify the City
Attorney s reporting obligations to both branches of government.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation is the capitol city and engages in year-
round efforts to collaborate with and advocate before the Utah legislature.
WHEREAS, the Utah legislature is meeting more frequently and opening more
bill files that affect Salt Lake City and all Utah municipalities.
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City has a strong interest in monitoring trends in federal
legislation.
WHEREAS, given the City s legislative goals, the City is committed to
establishing a fulltime staff of City employees who are engaged in and supporting the
City s legislative interests.
WHEREAS, the City Council and the Mayor have a significant interest in equally
participating in the direction of the City s collaboration and advocacy for the City s
legislative interests.
WHEREAS, under City Code 2.08.040, the Salt Lake City Attorney s Office is
responsible to both the Mayor and the City Council, and the executive and legislative
branches enjoy equal and independent access to the services of the City Attorney s
Office.
2
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City now desires to amend city code to
create a division of legislative affairs within the Department of the City Attorney.
WHEREAS, the division of legislative affairs will direct the City s legislative
advocacy and collaboration efforts, and will be equally responsible to the Mayor and the
City Council.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City also desires to clarify the
Department of the City Attorney s reporting obligations to both branches of government
and clarify the instances in which the City may hire outside counsel.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That section 2.08.040 of the Salt Lake City Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
2.08.040: OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY:
A. Functions:
1. The city attorney shall be the chief legal officer of the city and shall be
responsible to the mayor and city council for the proper administration of the
legal affairs of the executive and legislative branches of city government. The
city attorney shall report to both the mayor and the council chair and may be
removed at the discretion of the mayor.
2. The executive and legislative branches of government shall enjoy equal and
independent access to the services of the office of the city attorney with reference
to their respective functions and duties. It shall be the responsibility of the city
attorney to administer the office of the city attorney in a manner which will enable
the mayor and city council to fulfill their respective duties in a timely fashion.
3. The foregoing notwithstanding, the city attorney shall not in any instance, either
personally, or by his or her deputies, act as both prosecutor and advocate before
(and at the same time advisor to) any board, commission, agency, officer, official
or body of the city. In cases where such a conflict shall arise, special counsel may
be employed who shall not be subject to the control or direction of the city
attorney in such matter, and who shall provide the legal service to or before such
board, commission, agency, officer, official or body.
3
4. Supervise the office of the city recorder, the risk management division, and the
division of legislative affairs.
B. Outside Executive Or Legislative Counsel: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed
to prohibit the city attorney from retaining outside counsel for either the city council or
mayor from appropriated funds, provided, however, that the city attorney will retain
outside counsel for either the mayor or city council only after he/she concludes that the
office of city attorney has a conflict of interest, is unable, or is unavailable to perform the
legal work requested on behalf of such branch of city government.
C. City Recorder:
1. The city recorder shall be assigned to the office of the city attorney and be under
the administrative direction of the city attorney; however, the recorder shall be
responsible to the city council, which shall have equal and independent access for
services with respect to legislative functions.
2. The city recorder shall keep the corporate seal, the official papers and records of
the city, as required by law; the record of the proceedings of the city, as required
by law; and shall attest legal documents of the city and do those other matters
prescribed by law.
D. Division of Legislative Affairs.
1. The division of legislative affairs will be responsible for monitoring state and
federal legislation and engaging in advocacy, collaboration, and tracking of all
legislative matters for the city.
2. The director of legislative affairs will be responsible for working with the
executive and legislative branches of city government to craft a legislative agenda
for the city and will report to both branches of city government on legislative
priorities and policies.
SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of __________________
2023.
____________________________________
Darin Mano, Council Chair
ATTEST:
4
_________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________.
_________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed.
_______________________________________
MAYOR
_________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _______ of 2023.
Published: __________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Date:__________________________________
By: ___________________________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL SERVICES 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 035X
LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DIRECTOR 034X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
LEGISLATIVE & POLICY MANAGER 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST III 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER)037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER)035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
APPENDIX B APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT
Effective June 25, 2023
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 033X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 033X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 036X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X*
INFORMATION MGT SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 038X
JUSTICE COURT ADMINISTRATOR 037X
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR
024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POLICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC LANDS
PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
URBAN FORESTRY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PUBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
SAFETY & SECURITY DIRECTOR 037X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, remov
or modified without approval of the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the
Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council
members elect are also equivalent to those provided to full time employees.
ed
911 BUREAU Job Title Grade
911 DISPATCH DIRECTOR 041X
911 COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 032X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
AIRPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF AIRPORTS 041X
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AIRPORT 040X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 039X
DIRECTOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE 039X
DIRECTOR FINANCE/ACCOUNTING AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT ADMINISTRATION/COMMERCIAL SERVICES 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 039X
DIRECTOR OF AIRPORT PLANNING & CAPITAL PROJECTS 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS - AIRPORT 039X
DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL READINESS & TRANSITION 039X
DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING 038X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY 041X
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 040X
CITY RECORDER 035X
LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DIRECTOR 034X
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBER-ELECT N/A*
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 041X
COUNCIL LEGAL DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - CITY COUNCIL 039X
ASSOCIATE DEPUTY DIRECTOR COUNCIL 037X
LEGISLATIVE & POLICY MANAGER 037X
SENIOR ADVISOR CITY COUNCIL 037X
SENIOR PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 033X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST III 031X
COMMUNITY FACILITATOR 031X
OPERATIONS MANAGER & MENTOR CITY COUNCIL 031X
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYST 031X
POLICY ANALYST/PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 028X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST II 028X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON/POLICY ANALYST 027X
CONSTITUENT LIAISON 026X
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT & COMMUNICATIONS SPECIALIST I 026X
ASSISTANT TO THE COUNCIL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 025X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT/AGENDA 024X
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 021X
COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 037X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - COMMUNITY SERVICES 037X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (ENGINEER)037X
PLANNING DIRECTOR 037X
BUILDING OFFICIAL 035X
DIRECTOR OF HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT 035X
DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION (PLANNER)035X
YOUTH & FAMILY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
APPENDIX B APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT
Effective June 25, 2023
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 037X
ARTS DIVISION DIRECTOR 033X
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DIRECTOR 033X
FINANCE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 041X
CITY TREASURER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 039X
CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER 036X
FIRE
FIRE CHIEF 041X
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF 037X
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 041X
DEPUTY CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER 037X
CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR 035X
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X*
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X*
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X*
INFORMATION MGT SERVICES
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 041X
CHIEF INNOVATIONS OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER 039X
JUSTICE COURTS
JUSTICE COURT JUDGE 038X
JUSTICE COURT ADMINISTRATOR 037X
MAYOR
CHIEF OF STAFF 041X
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 041X
COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 039X
SENIOR ADVISOR 039X
COMMUNICATIONS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 030X
POLICY ADVISOR 029X
REP COMMISSION POLICY ADVISOR 029X
COMMUNITY LIAISON 026X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
OFFICE MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 024X
COMMUNITY OUTREACH - EQUITY & SPECIAL PROJECTS
COORDINATOR
024X
COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT MANAGER - MAYOR'S OFFICE 021X
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 019X
CONSUMER PROTECTION ANALYST 016X
POLICE
CHIEF OF POLICE 041X
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE 039X
DEPUTY CHIEF POLICE 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - COMMUNICATIONS 037X
ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR - INTERNAL AFFAIRS 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC LANDS
PUBLIC LANDS DIRECTOR 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUBLIC LANDS 037X
GOLF DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PARKS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
URBAN FORESTRY DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
PUBLIC SERVICES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES 041X
CITY ENGINEER 039X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS 038X
SAFETY & SECURITY DIRECTOR 037X
FACILITIES DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
FLEET DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
STREETS DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
COMPLIANCE DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
PUBLIC UTILITIES
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC UTILITIES 039X
CHIEF ENGINEER - PUBLIC UTILITIES 037X
WATER QUALITY & TREATMENT ADMINSTRATOR 037X
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT 026X
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 041X
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 037X
SUSTAINABILITY
SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTOR 041X
SUSTAINABILITY DEPUTY DIRECTOR 037X
WASTE & RECYCLING DIVISION DIRECTOR 035X
Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, remov
or modified without approval of the City Council.
* Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the
Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council
members elect are also equivalent to those provided to full time employees.
ed
Director of Legislative and Government Affairs
The Director of Legislative and Government Affairs reports to the City Attorney and is responsive
to both the Legislative and Administrative branches of Salt Lake City government.
The Director is responsible for monitoring and interpreting state legislation, appropriations and
authorizations, and proposed or existing state regulations, keeping both the Legislative and
Administrative branches of Salt Lake City government informed of legislative impacts to the City,
and advising and developing policy responses.
Incumbent must be able to work extended hours and on weekends as needed, especially while the
Legislature is in session.
Duties:
-Helps ensure City departments are apprised of existing and proposed state regulations and
laws and ensures such regulations and laws are fully implemented.
-Knows City legislative priorities and advocates for City legislative priorities before the
State legislature.
-Communicates effectively between the Administrative and Legislative branches of Salt
Lake City government to -upon and
clearly communicated internally and externally.
-Knows City department-specific legislative priorities and negotiates the acceptable City
priority when multiple departments have different/conflicting priorities.
-Ensures City departments and Administrative and Legislative branches of government
timely receive information necessary to understand and participate in City legislative
priorities.
-Participates with City elected officials and department leadership in establishing direction,
goals, and policies.
-Meets with staff in both branches of City government to determine needs and challenges.
-Oversees staff in the Office of Legislative Affairs and outside contracted lobbyists, and
helps set goals for performance.
-Ensures compliance with applicable federal and/or state laws, regulations, and/or City
rules, standards and guidelines, etc.
-Represents City interests on key legislative issues, task forces, committees, etc. and/or
drafts legislation, find sponsors, proposes amendments, etc.
-Ensures that legislation is implemented and followed.
-Works with both branches of City government and legislators if there are concerns in
implementation.
-Identify and prioritize system changes and improvements in legislative processes.
-Demonstrate and utilize knowledge and understanding of best practices in working with
the legislature.
-Supervise subordinate personnel including hiring, determining workload and delegating
assignments, training, monitoring and evaluating performance, and initiating corrective or
disciplinary actions.
-Gives recommendations to both branches of City government regarding implementation of
passed legislation.
-Tracks current events, legislation and other issues of interest to both branches of City
government.
-Other duties as assigned.
Qualifications:
-Sufficient education to demonstrate an aptitude to perform above and related duties; AND
minimum of six (6) years of progressively responsible experience directly related to
municipal government administration, and state and local legislative processes; OR An
equivalent combination of education and experience.
-Thorough knowledge of principles and practices of city government and legislative
processes; Utah laws, regulations, and guidelines governing all aspects of municipal
operations; legal and political issues affecting city operations and management.
-Considerable skill in the art of diplomacy and cooperative problem solving; establishing
and maintaining effective working relationships with state, federal, and other local
officials, elected officials and City residents.
-Ability to understand and interpret complex laws, rules, regulations, policies, and
guidelines; establish and maintain effective working relationships with employees, other
entities and the public; communicate effectively, verbally and in writing; implement
cooperative problem-solving processes.
-The ability to communicate information and ideas so others will understand, including the
ability to adapt communication.
-Collaborative with stakeholders and both branches of City government.
-The ability to think critically to help solve problems.
-The ability to tell when something is wrong or is likely to go wrong and help pull the right
people together to solve it.
-Experience working with diverse communities.
-Strong planning/project management skills.
Salt Lake City Corporation, Human Resources Department
Job Title: Finance Grant Analyst
Job Code Number: 002589 FLSA: Exempt
Pay Level: 27 EEO Code: 2
Bargaining Unit: 600 Benchmark: Research Analyst Grant Prog. Mgr.
JOB SUMMARY:
The Finance Grant Analyst will be under the general direction of the Deputy Director of Finance. The
Finance Grant Analyst will assist in the financial monitoring of multiple grants to ensure compliance
with city financial processes as well as state and federal grant requirements. ,
TYPICAL DUTIES:
Assist the Deputy Controller with Financial support for Housing grants. This includes, but limited to:
Working alongside other financial professionals.
Preparing calculations in Excel
Managing and approving payments through Workday
Reviewing, reconciling, and administering controls for grant funds
Analyzing, summarizing and/or reviewing data
Reporting findings, interpreting results and/or making recommendations
Collaborating with other team members
Work to ensure budgets and budget amendments are reconciled.
Assist in entering grants into Workday and managing the Workday Grants process.
Assist the Grant Manager with reporting and monitoring of grants. This includes, but not limited to:
Assisting the Housing Stability division with City contracts and processes.
Reviewing subrecipient contracts to ensure grant compliance.
Serves as a liaison to provide administrative and technical guidance.
Identifies, resolves, and ensures system compliance issues to follow State and Federal
regulations, as well as City policies, procedures, and ordinances.
Organizes and reviews grant files to ensure documentation is complete, maintained, and
retained for appropriate audit trails.
Prepares and presents reports for informational briefings and status updates.
Performs other duties as assigned.
MINIMUM OUALIFICATIONS:
1. B ch as accounting,
business or finance and four years of years in contract and/or grant experience. Education and
experience may be substituted on a year-for-year basis
2. Knowledge of finance and accounting theory, including generally accepted accounting principles.
3. Knowledge of administering and managing grants and contract policy, procedure, and guidelines
under City, State, and Federal laws and regulations.
4. Knowledge of 2 CFR 200 Federal grant regulations.
5. Ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing and build consensus with diverse
backgrounds, with varied organizational needs and differing priorities.
6. Ability to coordinate with and instruct others, as necessary, to ensure compliance and accuracy.
7. Ability to independently bring tasks and projects to meet successful and timely resolution.
8. May require minimum amounts of travel to and from meetings, trainings, and conferences.
9. Occasional non-traditional working hours, which may include evening and weekend meetings.
PREFERRED OUALIFICATIONS:
1. Experience in federal grant administration.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
1. Light physical effort, comfortable working conditions, handling of light weights, intermittent sitting,
standing and walking.
2. Considerable exposure to stressful situations as a result of report deadlines and human behavior.
Offers of employment are contingent on successful completion of a criminal background check
in accordance with City policy and applicable law. Criminal offenses will be reviewed on a
case-by-case basis and do not automatically disqualify a candidate from City employment.
The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by
persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities
and skills required of personnel so classified.
All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with
disabilities.
Position Review Information
Date: 10/28/2023
Departmental Approval: Mary Beth Thompson
HR Consultant Approval: Mike Sanchez
Compensation Approval: David Salazar
Notes: Update to minimum qualifications
Item E1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation - Youth VOA Shelter, 888 South 400 West
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting temporary zoning regulations
authorizing a temporary increase in overnight capacity at the youth homeless resource center
at 888 South 400 West.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations
Authorizing Temporary Increase in Overnight Capacity
at the Youth Homeless Resource Center at 888 S 400 W)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2014, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Volunteers of America to operate a thirty-bed homeless youth shelter at
888 S 400 W (the “Shelter”); and
WHEREAS, in 2022 there was a 30% rise in homelessness among families with children
and in June 2023 alone there were 297 unaccompanied homeless youth; and
WHEREAS, with these increases in homelessness among youth there has not been a
commensurate increase in the shelter space available for homeless youth; and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of youth
experiencing homelessness and the efforts to address the needs of those youth experiencing
homelessness has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising
social crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless youth resource centers are opened (or
permanent housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily increasing the
overnight capacity at the Shelter; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that youth experiencing homelessness
have access to shelter; and
2
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the Shelter has submitted and is in the process of pursuing an amendment to
its conditional use permit to increase the number of beds it can provide, but the application is
currently being processed by the relevant city departments and will require additional analysis
before it can be considered by city land use authorities; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days, no
more than twenty additional overnight sleeping accommodations for youth less than twenty three
years old at the Shelter on an emergency basis to provide shelter to youth experiencing
homelessness (a “temporary overflow homeless shelter use”), subject to the provisions herein;
and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered youth pending consideration of an amendment to the Shelter’s conditional use permit
constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use
regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
3
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit youth
shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing safe housing for the
City’s unsheltered youth pending consideration of the conditional use permit amendment to
permit the increased number of beds constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest
sufficient to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 888 S 400 W, which is already operating as a youth homeless shelter.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity from thirty beds to fifty
beds for homeless youth less than twenty three years old at the location identified in Section 2
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the Shelter is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The Shelter shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
4
b. Volunteers of America, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed fifty
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
issued prior to any increase in overnight occupancy of the Shelter pursuant to
this Ordinance.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the Shelter on
August 27, 2014 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This temporary zoning ordinance shall remain in effect until 180
days after its effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
5
___________________________
Katherine Pasker, Senior City At
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
VOA TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: April 12, 2024
By:
torney
Item E2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation – King HRC, 131 East 700 South
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting temporary zoning regulations
authorizing a temporary increase in overnight capacity at the Geraldine E. King Women’s
Resource Center located at 131 East 700 South.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing a
Temporary Increase in Overnight Capacity at the Geraldine E. King
Women’s Resource Center located at 131 East 700 South)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2018, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Shelter the Homeless to operate a 200-bed homeless resource center at
131 East 700 South (the “HRC”); and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the challenge addressing the needs of those
individuals has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising social
crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless resource centers are opened (or permanent
housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily increasing the overnight
capacity at the HRC; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that individuals experiencing
homelessness have access to shelter; and
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah is in the process of siting a permanent homeless resource
campus but additional time is needed in order to locate and prepare the location, and during such
2
period it is in the best interests of the city to allow additional capacity at existing homeless
resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days, no
more than 50 additional overnight sleeping accommodations at the HRC on an emergency basis,
subject to the provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered pending the creation of a larger state run facility constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit new
and expand existing shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that temporarily increasing the
overnight capacity of existing shelter resources, pending the creation of a larger state-run facility,
3
to help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness have access to shelter constitutes a
compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 131 East 700 South, which is already operating as a homeless resource
center.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity to 250 beds
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the HRC is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The HRC shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
b. Shelter the Homeless, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 250
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
4
__________________________
Katherine Pasker, Senior City At
issued prior to any increase in overnight occupancy of the HRC pursuant to
this Ordinance.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the HRC on or
about April 11, 2018 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall remain in effect until 180 days after its
effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
KING TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 12, 2024
By: _
torney
Item E3
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation – Miller Resource Center, 242 West Paramount Avenue
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting temporary zoning regulations
authorizing a temporary increase in overnight capacity at the Gail Miller Resource Center
located at 242 West Paramount Avenue.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing a Temporary Increase in
Overnight Capacity at the Gail Miller Resource Center located at 242 West Paramount Avenue)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2018, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Shelter the Homeless to operate a 200-bed homeless resource center at
242 West Paramount Avenue (the “HRC”); and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the challenge addressing the needs of those
individuals has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising social
crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless resource centers are opened (or permanent
housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily increasing the overnight
capacity at the HRC; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that individuals experiencing
homelessness have access to shelter; and
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah is in the process of siting a permanent homeless resource
campus but additional time is needed in order to locate and prepare the location, and during such
2
period it is in the best interests of the city to allow additional capacity at existing homeless
resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days, no
more than 50 additional overnight sleeping accommodations at the HRC on an emergency basis,
subject to the provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered pending the creation of a larger state run facility constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit new
and expand existing shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that temporarily increasing the
overnight capacity of existing shelter resources, pending the creation of a larger state-run facility,
3
to help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness have access to shelter constitutes a
compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 242 West Paramount Avenue, which is already operating as a homeless
resource center.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity to 250 beds
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the HRC is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The HRC shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
b. Shelter the Homeless, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 250
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
4
___________________________
Katherine Pasker, Senior City At
issued prior to any increase in overnight occupancy of the HRC pursuant to
this Ordinance.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the HRC on or
about April 11, 2018 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall remain in effect until 180 days after its
effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
MILLER TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: April 12, 2024
By:
torney
Item E4
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation – St. Vincent de Paul Center, 437 West 200 South.
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting temporary zoning regulations
authorizing a temporary overnight shelter at the St. Vincent de Paul Center located at 437
West 200 South.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing a Temporary
Overnight Shelter at the St. Vincent de Paul Center located at 437 West 200 South)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2014, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to The Road Home to operate an approximately 65-bed winter homeless
resource center at 437 West 200 South (the “HRC”); and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the challenge addressing the needs of those
individuals has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising social
crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless resource centers are opened (or permanent
housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily extending the period in
which the HRC can provide overnight shelter services; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that individuals experiencing
homelessness have access to shelter; and
WHEREAS, extending the period during which an existing shelter can provide overnight
accommodations, as opposed to siting an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the
community as a whole; and
2
WHEREAS, the State of Utah is in the process of siting a permanent homeless resource
campus but additional time is needed in order to locate and prepare the location, and during such
period it is in the best interests of the city to allow additional capacity at existing homeless
resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days,
continued overnight sleeping accommodations at the HRC on an emergency basis, subject to the
provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered pending the creation of a larger state run facility constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit new
and expand existing shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that temporarily extending the
3
period in which the HRC can provide overnight shelter services, pending the creation of a larger
state-run facility, to help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness have access to
shelter constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient to justify this temporary
land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 437 West 200 South, which is already operating as a winter homeless
resource center for the period between October 1 and April 15 each year.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. The HRC continuing to provide overnight homeless
shelter accommodations beyond April 15th, and at the current level of occupancy, is hereby
authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. Allowing the HRC to continue providing overnight shelter
beyond April 15th, at the existing level of occupancy, is authorized subject to the following:
a. The HRC shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
b. Catholic Community Services, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client
ratio in compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security
guards may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
4
__________________________
atherine Pasker, Senior City Att
c. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the HRC on or
about August 13, 2014 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall remain in effect until 180 days after its
effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
SVDP TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 12, 2024
By: _
K
orney
Item E5
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: Temporary Land Use Regulation – Temporary Shelter, 255 South 600 West
Motion 1 –
I move that the Council adopt an ordinance enacting temporary zoning regulations
authorizing a temporary shelter community use at approximately 255 South 600 West Street.
Motion 2 –
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An ordinance enacting temporary land use regulations authorizing
a temporary shelter community use at approximately 255 South 600 West Street)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration of or recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to enact an
ordinance establishing a temporary land use regulations for any part of a municipality if the
legislative body makes a finding of a compelling, countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City and the State of Utah are committed to ensuring that persons
experiencing homelessness have access to shelter and have been pursuing innovative ways to
provide temporary housing options to unsheltered individuals; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah acquired portable living structures to provide secure and
more weather-resistant individual living space to persons experiencing homelessness as part of a
temporary shelter community pilot project; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency (“SLCRDA”) has committed
property it owns at approximately 255 South 600 West Street to host a temporary shelter
community during the initial phase of the temporary shelter community pilot project; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah intends to establish the temporary shelter community on a
different property on a longer-term basis, but needs a short period of time in which to continue
operations while the new location is prepared; and
WHEREAS, the SLCRDA property at approximately 255 South 600 West Street is zoned
G-MU Gateway Mixed Use District, which does not allow a shelter community use; and
WHEREAS, the temporary shelter community use is only intended to be located on the
SLCRDA property for approximately 60 days, and making an amendment to the city’s land use
2
regulations and/or zoning map for the proposed short-term use is inconsistent with established
long-term planning mechanisms that ordinarily would apply to the SLCRDA property; and
WHEREAS, leaving the portable living structures vacant during this short relocation
period is contrary to the State of Utah’s investment in the structures and the stability of the
housing they offer; and
WHEREAS, temporary land use regulations allowing a temporary shelter community at
approximately 255 South 600 West Street on a short-term basis are necessary to implement the
initial phase of the pilot project and allow the State of Utah sufficient time to prepare the long-
term site; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow a temporary shelter community
use at approximately 255 South 600 West Street for a period not to extend past July 31, 2024
subject to the provisions herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the City Council finds that accommodating a temporary shelter
community (as defined below) at approximately 255 South 600 West Street for up to two months
in order for the State of Utah to relocate the temporary shelter community to a more appropriate
location, without jeopardizing the housing of individuals that would otherwise be unsheltered,
constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interests that justifies these temporary land use
regulations. The City Council also finds that pursuing innovative solutions to mitigate impacts of
homelessness and addressing the issue of individuals camping in public spaces by authorizing a
temporary shelter community use at the SLCRDA property at approximately 255 South 600
West Street further justifies these temporary land use regulations.
3
SECTION 2. Location. These temporary land use regulations shall apply only to
SLCRDA-owned property located at approximately 255 South 600 West Street.
SECTION 3. Definitions.
“Portable living structure” is an enclosed structure with a footprint no greater than 200
square feet intended to provide temporary living quarters and space to store personal belongings
for persons experiencing homelessness and for service provider’s staff. A portable living
structure must be constructed with solid walls and a roof that meet applicable snow and wind
load ratings, have a lockable door, be collapsible or easily disassembled, and may be no taller
than 10 feet. An example of a portable living structure is provided in Exhibit A attached hereto.
A portable living structure does not include a tent manufactured for recreational camping, a
makeshift tent, a trailer, a manufactured home (as defined in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake
City Code), a recreational vehicle, accessory dwelling unit, tiny home, or any other item or
structure not similar to the example in Exhibit A.
“Temporary shelter community” is a land use that is a grouping of temporary, portable
living structures intended to provide shelter for persons experiencing homelessness in a
concentrated area on a lot or parcel owned or leased by a governmental entity with the
permission of that governmental entity. A temporary shelter community is not a recreational
camping use and shall not occur within a public right-of-way.
SECTION 4. Uses Authorized. A temporary shelter community use at the
location identified in Section 2 above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in
Section 5.
4
SECTION 5. Conditions. The temporary shelter community use at the location specified
in Section 2 is authorized subject to the following:
a. The portable living structures to be occupied shall meet all building and fire
code requirements for such use unless other reasonable means or methods are
approved, in writing, by the Fire Marshal and/or the Chief Building Official.
A decision on whether a plan for alternative means and methods under this
section provides sufficient assurance for life safety protection shall be made in
the sole discretion of the Building Official and/or Fire Marshall and shall not
be appealable.
b. A homeless services provider selected to manage the temporary shelter
community must provide on-site supervisory staff to coordinate the needs of
the persons occupying the portable living structures. The services provider
shall staff the temporary shelter community 24 hours per day, seven days per
week while these temporary land use regulations are in effect.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 50
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
issued prior to any overnight occupancy of the building.
d. The services provider shall comply with the previously submitted security and
operations plan that met the requirements set forth in Subsection
21A.36.350.A.2 of the Salt Lake City Code. In addition to the requirements in
that subsection, the security and operations plan addresses the impacts of the
5
proposed temporary shelter community and identifies actions to mitigate those
impacts including, but not limited to:
i. Employing security personnel 24 hours per day, seven days per week
to regularly patrol the premises of that property;
ii. Communicating with the Salt Lake City Police Department frequently
including coordinating with the SLCPD’s use of CompStat
information to ensure public nuisance issues are mitigated.
e. The services provider shall maintain the existing fencing. Installed fencing
may be up to 6 feet tall in all areas of the property during the period that this
temporary land use is in effect, including required yards, but any fencing that
exceeds allowable fence heights or otherwise do not comply with the
requirements set forth in Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.120 shall be
removed by July 31, 2024.
f. The services provider shall require all patrons of the temporary shelter
community to check in and check out and maintain an accurate log of those
staying at the facility
g. Each portable living structure shall accommodate only one person plus any
pets.
h. A maximum of 27 portable living structures may be located on the property
described in Section 2 above.
SECTION 6. Duration. This temporary zoning ordinance shall remain in effect until July
31, 2024 unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
6
___________________________
atherine D. Pasker, Senior City A
SECTION 7. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on June 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
TSC TLUR 4.12.2024v1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 12, 2024
By: _
K
ttorney
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________Date Received: _________________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2023-00952
Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment
STAFF CONTACT:Grant Amann, Associate Planner
grant.amann@slcgov.com, 801-535-6171
DOCUMENT TYPE:Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance as recommended by Planning Commission
BUDGET IMPACT:None
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being
proposed.
1. Amendments to 21A.24.010 General Provisions
Removal of language dictating design features such as exterior building colors,
residential building foundation standards and entrance landing requirements.
2. Amendments to 21A.24.020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 100, 110, and 120
Removal of language dictating the location of garages doors. This language is a
design element that was made illegal to regulate by the updates to the Utah State
Code.
Clarification on the location that replacement garages can be built. This language
matches the historic interpretation at the city and increases readability and
understanding of the code.
Clarification that in FP and FR districts, accessory buildings are not permitted in
any required yard, but are permitted in non-required yards.
3. Amendments to 21A.36.190: Residential Building Standards For Legal Conforming
Single-Family Detached Dwellings, Two-Family Dwellings And Twin Homes In
Nonresidential Zoning Districts
Removal of language dictating foundation standards and entrance landings. This
language is redundant and unenforceable in the zoning code because it is already
addressed in building code.
4. Amendments to 21A.40.050: General Yard, Bulk, and Height Limitations:
Clarification and addition of language dictating the location of accessory
buildings, especially those located in side yards. This language clarifies that
accessory buildings are permitted in required interior side yards when located a
minimum of 4 feet from any portion of the principal building.
Addition of an illustrative graphic which helps depict this regulation.
Clarification of language dictating the location of accessory buildings in rear
yards, which is generally one foot from side and rear lot lines, and no closer than
4 feet to any portion of the principal building.
This clarification also helps distinguish pedestrian connections, such as
not be considered attached.
5. Amendments to 21A.62.040 -Definitions of Terms
Clarification in the definitions that impact accessory and attached structures.
Clarification in the definition of the front line of buildings
porches the
location of attached garages can hinge on the location of the porch.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community
Councils on November 21, 2023.
No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal.
The Planning Commission public hearing was held on January 10th, 2024.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to
the City Council for the proposal as requested by the applicant.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access)
b)PC Minutes of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access)
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of January 10, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of City Council Hearing
4. Petition Initiation Request
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2023-00952
Attached Garages Zoning Text Amendment
November 17, 2023 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division
November 17, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00952 was assigned to Grant Amann,
Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
November 21, 2023 Early notification announcement of the project to all recognized
community councils, providing information about the proposal
and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45-
day input and comment period.
December 28, 2023 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice
of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at
various library public noticing points city wide.
January 10, 2024 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice
period.
January 10, 2024 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a
positive recommendation to approve the proposed text
amendment.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00952-The Salt Lake City
Planning Division is proposing a text amendment to update the standards related to attached
structures, which includes garages, entrance landings, and building foundations. In 2021, Utah
State code was amended, changing standards required of these structures. The changes to the
state code imposed limitations on what municipalities can require in terms of design elements.
As a result, City code needs to be updated to match these regulations. The amendment focuses on
aligning the standards with city goals and addressing state law. The text amendments apply
citywide.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE: Room 326, 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and
County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more
information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-
Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All
comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com.The application details
petition number PLNPCM2023-00952
The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make
requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate
in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or
relay service 711.
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council:
TO:Salt Lake City Council
DATE:
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM:Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2023-00730
Approx. 536 S. 200 W. Zoning Map Amendment
STAFF CONTACT:Grant Amann, Principal Planner
grant.amann@slcgov.com,801-535-6171
DOCUMENT TYPE:Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:Approve the ordinance amending the zoning map for the property at
approximately 536 S. 200 W. as recommended by Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT:None
The applicant is requesting the rezone as they are considering options for the property.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all property owners and
current occupants within 300 ft. on January 2, 2024.
No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal.
The Planning Commission public hearing was held on February 28
th, 2024.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to
the City Council for the proposal as requested by the applicant.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of February 28, 2024 (Click to Access)
b)PC Minutes of February 28, 2024 (Click to Access)
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of February 28, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of City Council Hearing
4. Petition Initiation Request
500 S 500 S
2.PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECTCHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2023-00730
Approx. 536 S. 200 W. Zoning Map Amendment
October 11, 2023 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division
October 11, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00730 was assigned to Grant Amann,
Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
January 2nd, 2024 Early notification announcement of the project to all property
owners within 300ft., providing information about the proposal
and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45-
day input and comment period.
February 15, 2024 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice
of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at
the property.
February 16, 2024 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice
period.
February 28, 2024 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a
positive recommendation to approve the proposed map
amendment.
3.NOTICE OFCITY COUNCILHEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00730-Jason Boal,
representing the property owners, is requesting to amend the zoning map for the properties
located at approximately 536 S. 200 W., 216 W. Orchard Pl., 224 W. Orchard Pl., 226 W.
Orchard Pl., and 230 W. Orchard Pl. The applicant is seeking to rezone the subject properties
from D-2 (Downtown Support District) to D-1 (Central Business District). The subject
properties are approximately 0.525 acres in total. No development plans were submitted with
this application.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE: Room 326, 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and
County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more
information, please visit www.slc.gov/council.Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-
Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All
comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com.The application details
petition number PLNPCM2023-00730.
The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make
requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate
in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or
relay service 711.
4.ORIGINAL PETITION
5.MAILING LIST
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: 1050 West 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2023-00609
The Council will be briefed about a proposal from the Administration to amend the zoning map for an
approximately 1.4-acre vacant City owned parcel at 1050 West 1300 South in City Council District Two
from its current R-1/5,000 (Single-family Residential) zoning designation to RMF-30 (Low-density Multi-
family Residential). The Administration has not prepared a development plan yet, but affordable housing
would likely be developed on the site if the proposed zoning map amendment is approved by the Council.
Council Members will recall recently approving a similar request for property at 756 South Montgomery
Street. The current request is the second in a series of similar requests for City owned parcels that will be
part of proposed West Side Infill Housing. Once the rezone process is complete for the properties, it is
anticipated that a request for proposals will be issued to construct infill housing on the sites.
The current R-1/5,000 zoning is limited to single-family homes and uses intended to serve them such as
schools, churches, and parks. Area zoning is dominated by single-family residential as shown in the map
below. The proposed RMF-30 zoning would allow small scale, low-density residential housing units. It
allows different housing types including single- and two-family, townhomes, multi-family, row houses, and
cottage developments. The zoning district can provide moderate density increases while minimizing
negative impacts to single-family neighborhoods.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning map amendment during its February 14, 2024
meeting and held a public hearing at which three people spoke in opposition to the proposal. Concerns
cited include impacts to neighborhood quality of life, the riparian corridor overlay, drainage issues,
driveways, and required parking would all reduce the number of units that could be built on the site. Other
comments included a desire for the property to be converted into a park as was the plan under a previously
Item Schedule:
Briefing: April 16, 2024
Set Date: April 16, 2024
Public Hearing: May 7, 2024
Potential Action: May 21, 2024
Page | 2
approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application (discussed below). Planning staff
recommended and the Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the
City Council. The Commissioner who voted against the proposal did not state a reason for his vote.
Area zoning map with the subject property outlined in blue.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. Since the property is owned by the City, the Council may wish to discuss with the Administration
what City goals for housing they have for potential development on the subject property such as if it
will be used to advance affordability goals.
2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if they intend the proposed housing units to be for
sale under the community land trust.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development (now Housing Stability) purchased the property
in 2010 with the intention of developing it for housing. In 2021 approximately $150,736 was awarded
through a constituent initiated CIP application to plan and design a park on the subject property. The CIP
process missed that the proposed park did not conform to the current zoning for residential housing. The
CIP process has been updated since then to include a zoning compliance check to avoid similar situations
in the future. Following the application’s approval, the Administration analyzed the property’s suitability
for a park, and housing was determined to be a better fit. The constituent was notified of the decision.
Council staff will track the previously awarded funds for the Council to consider recapturing them for a new
project in a future CIP cycle. It is the Administration’s intention to develop housing on the property.
Because the property’s proximity to the Jordan River, a portion of it is within the riparian corridor overlay
(RCO) which protects the river from impacts caused by development (see image below). If the property is
developed, an RCO permit must be obtained. Areas within RCOs cannot be developed, which limits the
potential number of dwelling units that can be constructed on the property.
Page | 3
Image showing riparian corridor overlay and its impact on the subject parcel highlighted.
Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division
The property is close to California Avenue and 900 West which are arterial streets with access to transit
and bike lanes. However, the section of 1300 South where this property is located is narrow and lacks curbs
and gutters. The road would need to be widened and improved to accommodate additional traffic
generated by development on the site. Additionally, utilities and drainage systems will need to be upgraded
to support proposed development.
The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted
nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can
outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the
zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 5-9 of
the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the
staff report.
Consideration 1 – Implementation of the Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt
Lake
Planning staff found the proposal generally aligns with goals and initiatives of the 2014 Westside Master
Plan, Plan Salt Lake (2015), and Housing Salt Lake (2023-2027) by adding incremental density to the area
on underutilized property with a variety of housing types.
Page | 4
Consideration 2 – Neighborhood Compatibility & Impact
Planning staff received comments from nearby residents who expressed concerns with the proposal. These
include impacts from increased density, and a desire to keep the property undeveloped. Planning staff
noted that the property “has not been set aside for recreational or preservation purposes and could be
developed under the current R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential zoning standards.”
Design standards in the RMF-30 zone will allow development of new housing that is compatible with the
existing neighborhood. In addition, this zone calls for durable materials, minimum requirements for glass,
a maximum length of external blank walls and other requirements to provide an aesthetically pleasing
development. The existing R-1/5,000 zoning does not have these requirements. In addition, development
standards are similar for both the R-1/5,000 and RMF-30 zoning districts as shown in the table below.
Required parking (shown in the table below) is to be provided on-site. This will help reduce on-street
parking on 1300 South.
Consideration 3 – Development Potential
The RCO will reduce the parcel’s developable area to approximately 1.25 acres. Based on this, Planning
staff calculated the following potential numbers of housing units under current and proposed zoning. It
should be noted that roads and driveways on the site, parking, setbacks and landscape buffers, and
maximum lot coverage may reduce these numbers.
R-1/5,000 Single-family residential (current)
10 new single-family homes with minimum lot sizes of 5,000 square feet.
RMF-30 (Low density multi-family residential (proposed)
Up to 36 new cottage development units with minimum 1,500 square foot lot sizes.
Up to 27 units of any other permitted housing type with minimum 2,000 square foot lot sizes.
In addition, RMF-30 zoning allows a mix of housing types, so there is potential for some combination of
single-family, duplex, row houses, cottages, and multi-family units if the zoning map amendment is
approved and the property is developed.
ZONING COMPARISON
The following table compares building height, setback, and other requirements for the current R-1/5,000
and proposed RMF-30 zoning districts.
R-1/5,000 (Current)RMF-30 (Proposed)
Maximum Building Height 28 feet for pitched roof,
20 feet for flat roof.
30 feet.
Front Yard 20 feet or average of the block
face.
20 feet or average of the block
face.
Side Yard 4 feet on one side and 10 feet on
the other.
Single family detached and two-
family: 4 feet on one side and 10
feet on the other.
Multi-family (maximum of 8
attached units): 10 feet.
Page | 5
Row Houses (maximum of 6
attached units): 6 feet on one side
and 10 feet on the other.
Cottage Development: 4 feet.
Rear Yard Minimum 25% of the lot depth or
20 feet, whichever is less.
Minimum of 20% lot depth, need
not exceed 25 feet (10 feet
required for cottage
developments).
Parking Requirements Two spaces per dwelling unit.Two-family: Two spaces per
dwelling unit.
Multi-family:
Studio and one bedroom:
One space per dwelling
unit.
Two or more bedrooms:
1.25 spaces per dwelling
unit.
Row House and
Sideways Row House:
Two spaces per dwelling unit.
Cottage Developments:
One space per dwelling unit.
Lot Area/Width 5,000 square feet, with minimum
lot width of 50 feet.
Single family detached, two-
family, multi-family, row houses:
2,000 square feet. Minimum lot
width requirements are not
applicable.
Cottage developments:
1,500 square feet. Minimum lot
widths are not applicable.
Analysis of Standards
Attachment E (pages 19-21) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards
that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized
below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through its various adopted
planning documents.
Complies
Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
Page | 6
The extent to which a proposed map amendment will
affect adjacent properties.
Complies
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes and provisions of any applicable
overlay zoning districts which may impose additional
standards.
Complies
The adequacy of public facilities and services
intended to serve the subject property, including, but
not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational
facilities, police and fire protection, schools,
stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and
wastewater and refuse collection.
Development will
require utility and
drainage systems
upgrades.
City Department Review
During City review of the petition, Public Utilities noted some offsite utilities will need to be upgraded as
discussed above. Also, Transportation stated improvements to the section of 1300 South where this
property is located will need improvements previously mentioned. No other responding departments or
divisions expressed concerns with the proposal, but stated additional review and permits would be
required if the property is developed. Additional information can be found in Attachment G (pages 24-26)
of the Planning Commission staff report.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• July 27, 2023-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division.
• August 17, 2023-Petition assigned to Rylee Hall, Principal Planner.
• August 29, 2023-Notice sent to the Glendale Community Council informing them of the petition.
45-day recognized organization comment period begins.
• September 27, 2023-Early notification notice mailed to property owners and residents within 300
feet of the subject properties.
• October 3, 2023-Online open house begins and runs through February 14, 2024
• October 13, 2023-45-day comment period for recognized organizations ends. No formal comments
were submitted by the recognized organizations.
• October 18, 2023-Planning staff presents proposal at the Glendale Community Council at the
Chair’s request.
• February 2, 2024-
o Public hearing notice posted on property.
o Planning Commission public hearing notices posted on City and State websites and sent
via the Planning Division listserv.
o Notices mailed to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject properties.
• February 14, 2024- Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to
forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment.
• XXX XX, 2024-Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office.
Page | 7
• XXX XX, 2024-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office.
• March 26, 2024-Transmittal received in City Council Office.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Salt Lake City Council –April 16th, 2024
PLNPCM2023-00609
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT//
1050 W 1300 S
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
REQUEST
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
o City-owned property
o R-1/5,000 to RMF-30
PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommended approval of the
zoning map amendment
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS
R-1/5,000
•Single-family residential
•5,000 SF minimum lot size
RMF-30
•Increased density
•Housing type options
•Design Standards
•Low-density residential
•Building height
•Lot coverage
•Setbacks
•Parking
IN COMMON
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
PROPERTY & NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Rylee Hall // Principal Planner
Rylee.hall@slcgov.com
801-535-6308
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Received: 3/26/2024
Date sent to Council: 3/26/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/25/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
_
SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2023-00609 - Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S
STAFF CONTACT: Rylee Hall, Principal Planner
801-535-6308 or rylee.hall@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve the petition for a zoning map amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the
zoning map designation of City-owned property at 1050 W 1300 S in July 2023. The request is
to rezone the entirety of the subject property from the R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential
zoning district to the RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential zoning district. The
proposal is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the
Westside Master Plan. On February 14th, 2024, the Planning Commission heard the petition and
forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the zoning map. If adopted,
the new zone would facilitate construction of more residential units than would be allowed in the
current zone as well as more options for housing types - including duplexes, townhomes, multi-
family and cottage-style development.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
rachel otto (Mar 26, 2024 14:31 MDT)
In 2010, the Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development (now Housing Stability)
purchased the property with funds intended for housing development and the land was
bookmarked for future housing development. Definitive plans for development are awaiting the
outcome of the rezone process.
The subject property is a large, vacant parcel with frontage on 1300 South. Properties directly
adjacent to the site area are zoned R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential and the subject site’s
block is also entirely within the R-1/5,000 Zone and contains only single-family homes. The
Jordan River and Jordan River Trail are located across the street from the property. Due to its
proximity to the Jordan River, a portion of this property is within the RCO (Riparian Corridor
Overlay) to protect this waterway from potential negative impacts caused by future development.
Any development of the property, under the current or proposed zone, will be required to obtain
a RCO (Riparian Corridor Overlay) permit, and the requirements for this permit will restrict
development potential in regards to building placement and overall density. The requirements for
obtaining a permit include a ‘no disturbance area,’ measured from the AHWL (Annual High
Water Line) which lands roughly along the front boundary of the property. For undeveloped land
that is greater than 1 acre, the ‘no disturbance area’ extends 100 ft. from the AHWL. This
translates as an approximate 100 ft. setback from the front property line and the land within this
setback may not be disturbed. Only a portion of the ‘no disturbance area’ can be used to calculate
the development potential (density) of future development.
The RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential zoning district is intended to create
transitional residential development between neighborhoods primarily composed of detached
single-family homes, like areas zoned R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential, and denser multi-
family and mixed-use development. The residential development allowed in this zone is small
scale and low-density in nature. It is intended to maintain the existing character of established
residential neighborhoods while allowing new small-scale multi-family development on
underutilized lots to expand options for housing. The development regulations for the RMF-30
are similar to the existing zone with slightly higher allowable building height and lot coverage
allowance. The RMF-30 Zone would also introduce design standards that are not required in the
R-1/5,000 Zone, such as requirements for building materials, ground floor glass, and blank walls
that face a street.
Key Zoning Standards Comparison (Minimum Requirements)
Zone
Lot
Area
per
unit
Lot
Width
Max.
Height
Front
Yard
Side
Yard
Rear Yard
Lot
Coverage
R-1/5,000
5,000
SF
50 ft.
28 ft. or
20 ft.
flat roof
Min. 25% of the
lot depth or 20 ft.,
whichever is less
40%
4 ft. on one
side & 10 ft.
on the other
Single
Family
(detached)
Two-
family
RMF-30
Multi-
family
(max. 8
attached
units)
2,000
SF
N/A
30 ft.
20 ft. or
the average
of the
block face
10 ft.
Min. of 20% lot
depth, need not
exceed 25 ft..
50%
Row
6 ft. on one
side and 10
ft. on the
other
Houses
(Max. 6
attached
units)
Cottage
Developm
ent
1,500
SF
4 ft.
10 ft.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Early Notification - Information concerning this petition was sent to the Glendale
Neighborhood Council on August 29th, 2023. The community council did not provide formal
comments on this proposal. In addition to this, notice of the proposal was mailed to all
property owners and residents within 300 ft. of the property on September 27th, 2023. An
online open house has been posted on the Planning Division’s website since October 3rd,
2023.
• Planning Commission Meeting - The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on
February 14th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. During
the review process, Staff received some public comments from neighbors who have concerns
about the proposal. These comments can be viewed in the Planning Commission Staff Report
(link under Planning Commission Records). The general concerns were about impacts to their
properties caused by an increase in residential density and a desire to maintain the existing
undeveloped lot as is. Although the lot is vacant, it has not been set aside for recreational or
preservation purposes and could be developed under its current zoning designation. Since the
property was purchased by the City in 2010, there has been some discussion about developing
the site as a park. In 2021, the city received and awarded funding for a CIP (Capital
Improvement Program) grant for the ‘Three Creeks West Park Planning and Design’ through
a constituent application. Following the approval of the CIP application, the city analyzed the
property’s suitability for a park and ultimately, the property was deemed ineligible, and the
constituent was notified of this decision. Two public comments were received prior to the
Planning Commission meeting and after the publication of the staff report. These can be
viewed in Exhibit 6 – Additional Public Comment (received after staff report publication).
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
d) Planning Commission Meeting Recording
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of the City Council Public Hearing
4. Original Petition
5. Mailing List
6. Additional Public Comment (received after staff report publication)
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. ORDINANCE
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
5. MAILING LIST
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
(RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION)
1. ORDINANCE
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 1050 West 1300 South to
change the zoning from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density
Multi-Family Residential District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1050 West 1300
South, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, (the “Property”) to change the zoning from R-
1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential
District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00609.
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning
Commission”) held a public hearing considering a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall
to rezone the Property from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low
Density Multi-Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00609; and
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said
petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1: Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by
the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property shall be and hereby is rezoned from R-1/5,000
Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District.
e:___________________________
____________________________
Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Att
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ,
2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
Rezoning 1050 W 1300 S from R-1 to RMF30_v1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Dat March 24, 2024
By:
orney
Exhibit A
Legal Description of the Property
Tax Parcel No. 15-11-381-053-0000
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND SITUATE IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SALT LAKE BASE AND
MERIDIAN, SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH. COMPRISING 1.26
ACRES OF LOT “G” GLENDALE PARK PLAT “A” DESCRIBED AS PARCELS 1 AND 2
IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 2003 AS ENTRY
NO. 8896641, IN BOOK 8912, AT PAGE 4525 OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER,
0.03 ACRES OF THAT PARTICULAR REMAINDER PARCEL OF LOT “G”, GLENDALE
PARK PLAT “A” DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED
NOVEMBER 22, 2002 AS ENTRY NO. 8430946, IN BOOK 8689, AT PAGE 0350 OF SAID
COUNTY RECORDER AND 0.12 ACRES OF THE REMAINDER PARCEL OF SAID LOT
“G” HISTORICALLY USED AS ACCESS FOR THE PARCELS WITHIN SAID LOT “G”.
BASIS OF BEARING FOR SUBJECT PARCEL BEING SOUTH 89º49’52” EAST 2869.92
FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 11.
SUBJECT PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SALT LAKE COUNTY WELL MONUMENT
MONUMENTALIZING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11;
THENCE SOUTH 89º49’52” EAST 2135.87 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER SECTION AND NORTH 00º10’08” EAST 354.67 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 3 ROD WIDE STREET AND
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 01º01’42” EAST 246.07 FEET ALONG A CHAIN LINK FENCE TO A
FENCE CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 86º25’53” WEST 40.17 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE TO A POINT ON
THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF CALIFORNIA PLACE PLAT C; THENCE NORTH
27º34’43” EAST (NORTH 27º20’00” EAST PER SAID PLAT) 66.44 FEET COINCIDENT
WITH SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY TO A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED
PLS 356548;
THENCE NORTH 61º46’57” EAST 5.58 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION IN A
FENCE LINE AND A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548;
THENCE NORTH 89º10’21” EAST 20.18 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO A
NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548;
THENCE SOUTH 89º58’20” EAST 166.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
6, CALIFORNIA PLACE SUBDIVISION PLAT “D” AND A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP
STAMPED PLS 356548;
THENCE SOUTH 89º08’04” EAST 109.51 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID SUBDIVISION, (SOUTH 89º24’28” EAST PER SAID PLAT), TO A NUMBER 5
REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548 SAID REBAR LYING 1.08 FEET EAST OF A
FENCE CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 00º14’43” WEST 50.95 FEET TO A POINT 0.40 FEET
SOUTHEASTERLY OF A FENCE CORNER;
THENCE NORTH 89º45’17” WEST 85.00 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 00º14’43” WEST 168.77 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE TO A POINT ON
THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID 3 ROD WIDE STREET;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES COINCIDENT WITH SAID RIGHT OF
WAY SOUTH 75º 58’22” WEST 25.28 FEET;
SOUTH 67º09’43” WEST 201.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
2. PROJECT
CHRONOLOGY
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2023-00609
July 27, 2023 Petition for the zoning map and amendment received by the Salt Lake City
Planning Division.
August 17, 2023 Petition assigned to Rylee Hall, Principal Planner.
August 29, 2023 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Glendale
Neighborhood Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day
Recognized Organization input and comment period.
September 27, 2023 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and
property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information
about the proposal and how to give public input on the project.
October 3, 2023 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The
Online Open House was posted to the online open house webpage on October 3rd,
2023 through February 14th, 2024.
October 13, 2023 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No
formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date
related to this proposal.
October 18, 2023 The proposal was presented by Staff at the a Glendale Neighborhood Council
meeting at the Chair’s request.
February 2nd, 2024 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning
Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Public notice posted
on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning
Commission meeting on February 14, 2024. Public hearing notice mailed.
February 14, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 14, 2024. By a
majority vote of 6-1, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00609 – Zoning Map
Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S – Mayor Mendenhall has initiated a petition to amend the zoning
map for city-owned property at the above-listed address. The proposal would rezone the property
from R-1/5000 (Single-Family Residential) to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential)
District. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to support appropriately scaled
housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. The project is within Council
District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council
concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting
the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
PLACE: Electronic and in-person options.
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person
opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including
WebEx connection information, please visit https://www.slc.gov/council/agendas/. Comments
may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an
email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared
with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Rylee
Hall at 801-535-6308 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via
e-mail at rylee.hall@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://aca-
prod.accela.com/SLCREF/Default.aspx, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition
number PLNPCM2023-00609.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711.
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT ofCOMMUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS
To:
From:
CC:
Date:
Re:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Nick Norris, Planning Director
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and
Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director
July 20, 2023
Petition Initiation to rezone city-owned land located at 756 South Montgomery Street, 929 South
Navajo Street, and 1050 West 1300 South
This memo is to formally request that a petition be initiated to rezone city-owned land located at the
referenced addresses. This proposal would rezone each parcel to RMF-30 to support appropriately
scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Plan. Other zoning districts that are similar
in scale may be considered based on community feedback. Please see the attached map for reference.
This initiation would also authorize a lot line adjustment for the parcel located at 929 South Navajo
Street in order to maintain the 9-Line trail. The Department of Community and Neighborhoods would coordinate with Parks and Public Lands and Engineering on the lot line adjustment.
This memo includes a signature block to formally initiate the associated petitions. Please notify the
Planning Division when the memo is signed.
Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you.
Concurrence to initiate the text amendment petitions as noted above.
Erin Mend7ritiatt(Jul 25, 2023 09:41 MDT) 07/25/2023
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406
PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480
WWW.SLC.GOV
TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174
Vicinity Maps of Subject Properties
756 South Montgomery Street
• Page 2
929 South Navajo Street
1050 West 1300 South
• Page 3
Created: 2023-07-20
Nick Norris(nick.norris@slcgov.com)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAzUCdiPJg3AA-x-Nu4NWZt94vuRcB_RYH
Rezone City Owned land in westside plan
Final Audit Report 2023-07-25
"Rezone City Owned land in westside plan" History
'El Document created by Nick Norris (nick.norris@slcgov.com)
2023-07-20 - 11:03:08 PM GMT
e. Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature
2023-07-20 - 11:03:55 PM GMT
ti Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
2023-07-21 - 4:50:46 AM GMT
0o Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2023-07-25 - 3:41:42 PM GMT - Time Source: server
9 Agreement completed.
2023-07-25 - 3:41:42 PM GMT
5. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP
ADAN GAMBOA MORGA 1226 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
AGUSTIN LOPEZ 1188 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ALFREDO ARELLANO; XOCHITI VILLALOBOS; JUAN
J GOMEZ VILLALOBOS (JT 1194 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ANDRZEJ FORYS; KRYSTYNA FORYS (TC) 1191 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ANNA L MARTINEZ; MARIA A MARTINEZ (JT) 1190 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ARIC CAMPBELL; VIRGINIA CAMPBELL (JT) 1014 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
AURORA GONZALEZ 1202 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
BERNARDO E HERNANDEZ 1042 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
CHRISTOPHER E SHELTON; COTY A SHELTON (JT) 1080 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
CVN&TNIT 1117 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
EFRAIN VAZQUEZ SANCHEZ 1191 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
EPIFANIO SARINANA; MARTHA E SARINANA (JT) 1204 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
GILES C LARSEN 1030 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
GTTC PROPERTIES LC 17 N EAGLEWOOD DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054
HANS G EHRBAR 08/23/2006 3375 W MOUNT ELLEN WY TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129
HUBERT CARDENAS 1203 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
HUGO SILVA; ANA L SILVA (JT) 1118 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JAMES B SWAYDAN & LORIE R SWAYDAN
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 05/10/20 2959 PALMETTO CIR ST GEORGE UT 84790
JAMIE M FENN; JEREMY R FENN 1084 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JANET KNUDSEN 1018 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JEREMY P. KING 1205 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JERRY D VANDEMERWE 1088 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOEL W CANNON; SHAWN CANNON (JT) 1183 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE A MORENO-ARRIAGA (JT) 1187 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE CHAVEZ; REBECA CHAVEZ (JT) 1066 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
JOSE LUIS ESTRADA; SANDRA ALFARO RIOS (JT) 1197 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE OJEDA; BLANCA OJEDA (JT) 1198 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE R HERNANDEZ; ROSALBA R HERNANDEZ (JT) 1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
KAP HLUN; BLAK ZING (JT) 1211 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
KEITH E TILLMAN; CARLA J TILLMAN (JT) 1212 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
KEVIN HOBBS; TANNISHA HOBBS (JT) 1106 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
LORETTA J QUINTANA 1058 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
LULU S JIMENEZ 2929 S LAZY J CIR WEST VALLEY UT 84120
LUONG H LE; BINH THANH NGUYEN (JT) 1120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MANUEL SANTIAGO 1115 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MARGARET H MADSEN; SCOTT K MADSEN (JT) 1199 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MARIA SALAZAR 1188 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MICHAEL C CLAPIER 6610 CHARLES ST RACINE WI 53402
MINH QUANG NGUYEN; SANG THI KIM LAI (JT) 7088 W ECHOMOUNT RD WEST VALLEY UT 84118
OWEN QUINONEZ 1201 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PATRICIA QUIROZ; VICTOR RAUL QUIROZ (JT) 1200 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PEDRO GUTIERREZ; NICOLASA GUTIERREZ (JT) 1194 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PHAP VO; BICH LE T VO (JT) 1197 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PHUONG VAN NGUYEN; TRUOC THI VO (JT) 1093 W MODESTO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PROVO-JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY AUTHORITY PO BOX 146001 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
RALPH PLESCIA; VONNA R PLESCIA (TC) 1048 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
RAUL & MARIE SEOANE FAMILY TRUST
03/13/2018 7455 S 4950 W WEST JORDAN UT 84081
REYNALDO B ROSALES 1182 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ROBERTO C PONCE; CARMEN A PONCE (JT) 1196 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ROLANDO GARCIA; EDGAR GARCIA (JT) 1198 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ROSA GARCIA-PLANCARTE 1179 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
SCOTT GOSLIN; VICKI GOSLIN (JT) 1207 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
SIRIAN ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ ROMERO;
SERGIO GARCIA VARILLAS (JT) 1197 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TALITA LATU; PASILI LATU (JT) 1020 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TANIELA VAKE 1100 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
THANH DAC NGUYEN; TU THI HUYNH (TC) 1123 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
THANH H SR NGUYEN; HUE T VO (JT) 1057 W MODESTO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TIN CEU AUNG 1113 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1193 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1010 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 4657 E 20TH ST JOPLIN MO 64801
URIEL M RODRIGUEZ; MARIA D RODRIGUEZ (JT) 1187 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
VIET TRUONG MAI; CHAN P PYO; NEE LA; THEH P
PYO 1217 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
WAYNE XIA; AMY XINGYUAN LI (JT) 6535 S CANYON CREST DR HOLLADAY UT 84121
ZARA AND TAJ INVESTMENTS, LLC 1121 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
Occupant PARCEL_ADDR CITY STATE ZIPCODE
Current Occupant 1127 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1123 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1109 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1103 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1091 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1120 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1110 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1108 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1060 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1050 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1042 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1032 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1040 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1086 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1082 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1189 S ONTARIO DR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1026 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1063 W MODESTO AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1203 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1189 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1195 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1064 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1026 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1020 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1016 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1024 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
(RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION)
> -----Original Messap;e--- -
> From: scott goslin,
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 6:31PM
> To: Hall, Rylee <rvlee-hall@slcgov.com>
> Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Request for plans, information about PLNPCM > 2023-00609
>
> Hello Rylee, thanks )'OU for your response.
> So I the neighbor have anything to sayingvoteabout this change? Or proposed change? > I think what may be built wouldaffect the overall decision > It originally stated a changein zoning, height ofstructureat center point and distances to other property.
> You informed me that a? 20%
> Size or distance would apply ( something like that clause).
> I see it affectingly changing the traffics, infrastructure, property price( in re.sale), etc.. > I will be attendingand hoping they move the project to mayor Mendalls neighborhood!! Her policies do not help our area.
> I also see a raising the base lot height to accommodate the drainage or septic systems. It a problem nei,."t to the rh<er, we havean additional pumping station L lhis neighborhood to deal
With just that. > Pleaselet me knowany details for this projectsince in directlyin my BACKYARD!
> Sincerely scott goslin
Hello Rylee , I have some additional comment’s to say about this project.
Even though this project does directly affect me in the backyard of my community, I have new
thoughts about it and the current housing situation in Salt Lake City.
I have seen new information on this topic through a local And nationwide view. Due to some
PBS reporting. ( Harvard study).
I was wrong in feeling about a loss of community value. This is a small view and not a
community building issue. The extra traffic congestion, noise, sight lines, loss of green space
etc.
However I do feel that property values will slide down, but taxes go higher. With the city finding
long term excuse to manage this property to keep its values.
Once a property is Rezoned it cannot be undone. Thus forcing the neighborhood to deal with is
short sighted vote.
I see that rents and housing pricing is outrageous in all
Community’s and in ours.
I understand that city wants to help alleviate this issue in any way they can for it residents.
However I do Not see this being realized. Lots of new housing and no cost breaks given to those
tenants.
But I do see several other issues that have fueled my opinion about this in a negative way.
1) A lot of housing but really not helping anyone but companies.
The city removed a housing structure for homelessness, only to build a new overpriced building.
I’m speaking of the downtown shelter. I’m sure the city has made money and “Rezoned” this
land to accommodate these projects.
Maybe the city sets up a long term deal with these resources. to help Provide housing at
reduced rate for tax relief or something to relief these tenants.
The current property’s of 1000w between Glendale ,
Modesto do not have septic connections to city. No sidewalks or lights.
The property in discussion will have to be raised in base elevation to help with drainage. We
have a pumping station to help with this matter already.
A rise in base elevation will affect the overall height of these structures. These properties and the
one for mentioned will also have a loss of 20 plus feet in lot size , to accommodate the street and
infrastructure codes.
Also this street that will be clogged due to heavier traffic.
I see the need for a rezoning but nobody can show me a Proposed site plan. Just any long term
thought to what this might be.
With any details of the change of height restrictions ,( 2 feet increased height. This does not do
anything except hide the views).
The proposed setback will put neighboring house looking into my home. And restricting river
and Mountain Views.
These are some of the details that seems to be lacking in this debate.
So I cannot believe anything good long term will Come out of this rezoning with out full ideas,
some thought into what we need and want this land to be. Also some full disclosure of what the
city wants and needs are.
In writing this I have contacted my local councilman Alejandro Puy, still awaiting a response.
2) I see rezoning all over the city but not helping anyone but white men, ( and I’m white).
The Conditional Use Permits have been done away with in salt lake county, city. Making it
very hard to find a space to start and grow a business . ( explaining later)
3) I see a huge taxes increase for anything in SLC, and not getting anything out of it. Except
Constant Construction, removal
Of parking downtown. And more F$@king scooters on the sidewalks. And as a Pedestrian
getting almost hit daily walking on sidewalks but Nobody using those bike lanes! The city has
received monies from these companies and they park their product on city land. But this doesn’t
improve anyone’s health. Just more fat dangerously unaware people! So much for bikes.
I’m not a big fan of this bike program so far.
I moved out of south salt lake after 17 years , when the huge increase of high rise apartments(ritz
bowling ), and seemed lack of long term vision. It was I , whom lacked the vision and did not
want live in such a congested area. ( and I have met Mayor Wood and like her vision at that
time.)
This was south salt city’s lack of Vision to me. And it only seems more money for the city as we
cram more into a smaller space.
They rezoned for the dodge dealerships and forced 6 blocks of traffic onto one street, Wentworth
ave. Not good for the community.
This being one of the reasons. I Moved to a lower income area. Better house 1910 to a 1998
build.
Only to Have a 100% increased taxes in less than 4 years in (Glendale).
So with the lack of clear vision, I would ask for a negative vote for this project.
So I feel that Salt Lake City may be doing the same quick fixes.
But lacking the best vision for long term growth.
I do not appreciate how mayor Medhall is more Media savey, to Have a camera running for all
Her great deeds. But not really for the greater good of our community.
So The business side,
Let me explain.
I was going to start and new year round food business to provide fresh greens growing
hydroponically, year round .
But when researching this issue. However when trying to find space to have the business,
almost impractical. The rise Land cost, city fees and lack of augiculture space. ( no rezoning or
permits, C.U.P. Changes.)
So with our Bad air and such seems uncontrolled growth, land, costs. I’ve chosen to Kill my
business and keep my head above water.
Now with high Interest rates not
Even possible now!
As for fair wages to pay for housing. I am a UNION member for 35 years. Being a union
member helps my bottom Line. Only because we Believe in wages for work.
I see a lack of good wages and people stretching to make ends meet. Paying more in a tip does
not help people long term and insults the consumer.
Pay a fair wages and this might float the boat! Amazing how nobody wants that?
Furthermore all city wants is another team. Really more growth forcing people out.
I’m sure these same issues are
Occurring in the north part of the city. Forcing others to find somewhere else to live but
nowhere to go, in SLC county, city.
So in closing I’m glad to
Hear the city wants to help. But I don’t think they have thought this out.
Vote No !
Sincerely Scott Goslin
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY24
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards,
Jennifer Bruno, Kira Luke, and
Sam Owen
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Budget Amendment Number 5 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024
Budget Amendment Number Five includes 23 proposed amendments, $32,633,928 in revenues and $70,351,358 in
expenditures of which $24,404,465 is from General Fund Balance and requesting changes to seven funds. Item A-3
is a request for $7 million of one-time General Fund monies which would be used to negotiate a loan with the
Thackeray Company, representing several businesses, who are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100
South in the Sugar House Business District. A fact sheet and additional info was pending at the time of publishing
this report.
Tracking New Ongoing General Fund Costs for the Next Annual Budget
(See Attachment 1 at the end of this staff report)
The chart of potential new ongoing General Fund costs for the FY2025 annual budget is available as Attachment 1
and included at the end of this document. If all the items are adopted as proposed by the Administration, then the
FY2025 annual budget could have $380,882 of new ongoing costs. The total new ongoing costs from Budget
Amendments 1 through 5 would be $7,568,554. It’s important to note that $3.1 million of that could be covered by
the Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation State Grant assuming the Legislature continues to appropriate sufficient
funds under the current formula and law.
Fund Balance
If all the items are adopted as proposed, then General Fund Balance would be projected at 28.12% which is
$67,210,724 above the 13% minimum target of ongoing General Fund revenues. It’s important to note that while
Fund Balance at this level is healthy the FY2025 annual budget (like the FY2024 annual budget) is anticipated to
have a relatively large structural deficit necessitating use of one-time Fund Balance.
The Administration has requested straw polls for the following items:
A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan for Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East ($7 Million one-time
from General Fund Balance and Transferred to the Loan Fund)
D-5: Housing Authority PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) Check ($40,000 to General Fund)
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
Project Timeline:
Set Date: April 16, 2024
1st Briefing: April 16, 2024
2nd Briefing: May 7, 2024
Public Hearing: May 7, 2024
3rd Briefing (if necessary): May 14, 2024
Potential Action: (tentative) May 21, 2024
Revenues Update
The Finance Department plans to provide a sales tax revenues update to the Council at the April 16 briefing. Overall
revenues have improved since Budget Amendment #4 when total General Fund revenues were forecast to be $1.4 million
below budget which was mostly driven by sales tax underperforming. The updated table shows total General Fund
revenues are trending slightly above budget partly because of the Funding Our Future 0.5% sales tax coming in higher.
The Department provided some additional details on revenue line items with significant changes:
- Sales Taxes: The regular sales and use tax is $2.7 million below budget while the local option Funding Our Future
(FOF) 0.5% sales tax is $3.7 million above budget. The two sales taxes have different exemptions and percentage
splits between which government entities receive the resulting revenue. This is why the two sales tax revenues do
not always trend in the same direction at the same time. The City took a conservative approach to budget
projections for the FOF sales tax since it was enacted in 2018. The historical is being used to refine FOF sales tax
projections for the FY2025 annual budget.
- Charges from Services: The $1.2 million (25%) increase from charges for services is caused by police off-duty
security (offset by an increase in actual police overtime). Also contributing is an increase in building civil
enforcement revenue as those accounts have been turned over to the collections unit.
- Franchise Taxes: The $925,203 (7.5%) increase from franchise taxes continues a recent trend after several years of
multi-million dollar decreases in this revenue source. The increase is due to water rate increases of about 22%
over prior year that are now impacting city revenue. This trend should continue as Public Utilities is requesting
another rate increase in FY2025.
- Rental and Other Income: The $419,599 (62%) increase is from facility rental revenue due to increased demand
for city facilities and increases in city costs for water, gas, and power utilities which are passed through. There is
an offsetting increase in these utility expenditures.
Fund Balance Chart
The Administration’s chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. Fund balance has been
updated to include proposed changes for Budget Amendment #5. Based on those projections the adjusted fund
balance is projected to be at 28.12%.
A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached to the transmittal. The
Administration requests that document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
Impact Fees Updates are pending further implementation of the City's new financial system (Workday) and
integration with Accela that handles building permit records.
The Administration’s transmittal provides an updated summary of impact fee tracking. The information is current as
of 7/20/23. The table below has taken into account impact fees appropriated by the Council on August 15 as part of
the FY2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) . As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have
no refunds during all of FY2024 and FY2025. The transportation section of the City’s Impact Fees Plan was updated
in October 2020. The Administration is working on updates to the fire, parks, and police sections of the plan.
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend” Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring
Impact Fees
Fire $273,684 More than two years away -
Parks $14,064,637 More than two years away -
Police $1,402,656 More than two years away -
Transportation $6,064,485 More than two years away -
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
Section A: New Items
Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the
transmittal for some of these items.
A-1: Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases for Fire Hydrant Rentals ($133,250 one-time from
General Fund Balance)
The Administration is requesting $133,250 to cover fee increases on maintenance costs on fire hydrants in the City. While
Public Utilities refers to this as “rental” fee, it is not renting hydrants in the traditional sense of rent. The fee covers
maintenance costs and use of the hydrants. Public Utilities increased this fee in FY 24, but it was overlooked while putting
together the Fire Department budget that year. For FY 25, Finance is recommending that this cost be shifted to non-
departmental as it is a City-wide expense for a City-wide benefit.
A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention (Total of $1,423,875 from General Fund Balance of which
$1,159,375 one-time and $264,500 ongoing)
In Budget Amendment #5 of FY2023, the Council approved $5.5 million to offer $8,500 one-time bonuses to all police
officers, except executive level (e.g., deputy chief and above), with a two-year employment commitment. The bonuses also
included the City paying the pensionable cost of approximately $3,000 on average to the Utah Retirement System for the
employee’s pension. If an officer left employment with the City before completing the two-year commitment, then they
would need to repay a prorated share of the cost to the City. The date of the bonuses are staggered based on an employee’s
hiring anniversary date. This item is requesting funding to continue providing bonuses to new hires using this same
framework.
The Administration is requesting $264,500 to provide 23 lateral hire bonuses. A lateral hire is when a police officer
working at another law enforcement agency is hired to work at the Salt Lake City Police Department. A lateral hire is
already POST certified and needs significantly less training than a new entry level hire. The estimated cost is $125,000 -
$150,000 for a new entry level police officer from date of hire to completion of all trainings so they can fully operate as an
officer out on patrol. The funding would be ongoing so bonuses could continue to be provided to lateral hires in future
fiscal years.
The Administration is also requesting $1,159,375 one-time to provide bonuses to new entry level and lateral hires expected
in May and retention bonuses to existing officers that haven’t yet participated in the bonus program.
The Department has relied on mandatory overtime to maintain minimum patrol staffing levels at times during recent
years. The Police Chief stated this approach helps in the short-term but is unsustainable in the long term. The bonus
program was designed to incentivize longer retention of officers and faster hiring of new officers. The program goal was to
stabilize staffing levels and help the Police Department reach full staffing within two years. The Department reports a high
participation rate by officers in the program and improved staffing levels.
In March, 34 funded sworn officer positions were vacant and two additional vacancies were anticipated. Depending upon
the completion rate of planned upcoming hiring classes, the Department could reach full functional staffing in 2024. Note
that there are many unknowns outside the City’s control when projecting when the Police Department could reach full
staffing such as the number of qualified candidates applying, the state of the Wasatch Front metropolitan and national
economies, officers on leave, crime rates, etc.
Policy questions:
1. Availability of Vacancy Savings is Pending – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on
available vacancy savings in the Police Department that could be used instead of General Fund Balance to cover
some of the costs for bonuses. An analysis of vacancy savings was pending at the time of publishing this staff
report.
2. Limit of One Bonus – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to confirm that only a single bonus is
offered. For example, if a sworn employee left, then would they be eligible for a second bonus upon returning in
the future?
3. Need to Continue Lateral Hire Bonus Program after Reaching Full Staffing – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration why providing bonuses for lateral hires is recommended to continue with ongoing funding after
the Department reaches full functional staffing levels?
4. Unused ARPA Funds – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to check if there are any unused ARPA
funds that were budgeted but not spent that should be recaptured and obligated for use by the federal deadline at
the end of this calendar year.
A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan for Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East ($7 Million
one-time from General Fund Balance and Transferred to the Loan Fund)
The Administration may be requesting a straw poll for this item (pending the fact sheet and updated info).
In order to facilitate a faster, less disruptive, and less costly reconstruction of 2100 S from 700 E to 1100 E, the
Administration proposes negotiating a market-rate loan of up to $7 million to The Thackeray Co. as the representative of
several entities in the area that are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100 S. This funding would be put toward
needed water and sewer upgrades in Sugarhouse and allow the City’s contractor to replace the infrastructure in
conjunction with the road upgrades instead of in subsequent phases that would necessitate re-opening the road over the
next several years. Release of the funds will be contingent on the City negotiating a loan agreement with the developer that
would include a market-rate interest rate and adequate collateral should the development not take place for some reason.
Additional information and a fact sheet will be shared with the council in the coming days.
At the time of publishing this staff report the fact sheet and additional information was pending. The funding is proposed
to be transferred to the Loan Fund for better tracking and so the funds don’t lapse to Fund Balance at the end of the fiscal
year recognizing that more time might be needed to negotiate loan agreements. One option the Council could consider is
approving the funds contingent upon later approval of the proposed loan terms.
A-4: State Funding for Avenues Cemetery Road Reconstruction and Irrigation System Upgrades ($3
Million one-time State Appropriation to the CIP Fund)
This budget amendment is requesting approval to receive additional $3,000,000 in State appropriated funds to be spent
on the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation CIP bond project. This request will permit the Summer 2024 bidding and
contracting to proceed without delays for the construction of the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation project. Funding any
later than June 30 may delay bidding and contracting or add cost to the project PRJ-230007 8323213 - BD Cemetery.
The project is funded by three sources: City's 2022 Sales Tax Revenue Bond (approx.$11,200,000); a state legislative
appropriation ($3,000,000, this request); and by a private donor ($1,000,000, received through a donation agreement
and budget amendment). Bond and donation amounts are combined in Row 20 of "Grant Information". The legislative
appropriation can be given to the City in no fewer than two separate issuances once money is spent down (i.e., a
reimbursement). However, the City needs the funds upfront to bid and award the construction contract. This funding
will be reimbursed by the State once the City spends it (even partially) and reports on performance outcome
measurements (likely FY 26/27). The funding allocation for the $3,000,000 from the state will not be recognized until the
contract is complete, which is anticipated to happen by April 16th. The final “Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery
Preservation” request for appropriation (RFA) from the legislature is also attached.
The request for appropriation states that unused funding should be returned to the State at the end of FY2025 (June 30,
2025). The actual deadline will be determined in the funding agreement between the City and State which could be later.
The total available funding for the Avenues City Cemetery road reconstructions and irrigation system upgrades is $15.2
million (from the bond, private donation, and state appropriation). This would significantly improve those aging assets
but not fully fund the estimated need of $14.1 million for irrigation system upgrades and $20 million for road
reconstructions.
A-5: Traffic Signal for 2200 West and 2100 North Intersection ($450,000 one-time from General Fund
Balance to the CIP Fund)
The Administration is requesting $450,000 to add traffic signals at the 2200 W /2100 N intersection. This is currently a
2-way stop sign controlled intersection in a high growth area of the City. There is a worsening safety concern at this
intersection that a traffic signal would address. Traffic at this intersection has increased faster than anticipated in recent
years, and drivers turning off 2200 West onto 2100 North are finding it challenging to identify safe gaps in traffic. This has
resulted in an increase in traffic accidents at this location including severe injuries. This issue is exacerbated by the
relatively high speeds (45 mph) on 2100 North that makes it harder for drivers to accurately judge gaps in traffic. In past
CIP discussions, the Council has expressed a willingness to fund capital projects to address legitimate and serious safety
issues instead of waiting for the annual CIP process. Some Council Members have also commented that serious and urgent
safety issues should not be forced to seek funding through the competitive CIP process.
A-6: Police Impact Fee Refunds ($47,592 one-time from Unappropriated Police Impact Fee Balance in
CIP)
The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property using Police Impact Fees. The intended property did not
work for the police precinct. Disencumbering of these funds has resulted in the required refund of impact fees plus actual
interest earned on the funds (as required by state law) due to their expiration. This refund will be funded with proceeds
from unappropriated Police Impact Fees. $38,464 (principal)+ Approximate Interest $9,128 = Total $47,592. At the time
of publishing this staff report, the option of using excess capacity to reimburse the General Fund for past eligible expenses
was being explored.
A-7: Update of the Transportation Section in the Impact Fees Facilities Plan ($29,817 rescope from last
IFFP update and $30,184 from Unappropriated Transportation Impact Fees)
The City is in the process of updating the Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) for Police, Fire and Parks. Updating the Streets
IFFP at the same time will not only be cost efficient but is needed for the efficient CIP planning of Streets and
Transportation. The Transportation bond is nearly complete and updating the Streets IFFP will aid Capital Asset Planning
(CAP) in the preparation of the CAP 10-year Plan. One hundred percent of the cost is impact fee eligible and the scope
includes Streets/Transportation Study and Preparation of the IFFP. The full request of $60,000 is to be funded by a
rescope of the remaining $29,816.67 from the 2020 IFFP appropriation, with the remainder to come from unallocated
Streets Impact Fees.
A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridge - Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement ($165,500 one-time
from General Fund Balance)
The Administration is requesting $165,000 to replace the rocks on the riverbank underneath the North Temple Jordan
River Bridge. The project entails removing the existing rocks and replacing them with larger boulders considered
uninviting for human activities. The request is framed as a reimbursement, but to date, the project is still in the permitting
process and has yet to begin.
In addition to discouraging unsanctioned access under the bridge, the rock replacement is anticipated to have a positive
environmental impact. The Administration has worked with the State's stream alteration division to ensure that the
project follows requirements to improve riverbank erosion control and will reduce scour (soil erosion around bridge
supports, which threatens bridge stability).
The North Temple Jordan River Bridge is currently the only location prioritized for this type of project. The rock
replacement project is one of several complementary approaches to reduce illegal activities in the area. Other efforts
include: a nearby trailhead parking lot closure, temporary fencing to limit access off the paved trail, targeted law
enforcement and overall increased police presence - including a Mobile Control Center on the Fairgrounds parking lot and
addressing limited lighting in the area (some of which is privately-owned).
Policy questions:
Need at other Bridges over the Jordan River – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how much this
approach would cost at other bridges over the Jordan River that are also impacted by illegal activities. For
example, public complaints and comments have noted campfires under bridges that caused wooden parts of the
bridges to be damaged.
Coordinating with the Folsom Trail – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on any
impacts this project may have on the planned completion of the western portion of the Folsom Trail from 1000
West to the Jordan River.
A-9: Additional Funding for 7 Days a Week Service from Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team Contract
($130,649 one-time from General Fund Balance)
In the FY2024 annual budget, the Council approved a $598,000 increase to the $802,000 ongoing base budget for
Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team contract. The new ongoing budget is $1.4 million. The Administration is
requesting a one-time increase of $130,649 as a result of two changes that were made this fiscal year. First the Clean
Team’s services were made immediately available to requests from the Police Department, and second, those services were
expanded from five to seven days a week. These changes were made to reduce duplication of clean up requests, increase
response times, and align the services hours with the seven days a week operating hours of the Police Department’s Camp
Mitigation Squads. Without the additional funding the Mobile Clean Team would reduce services to five days a week to
stay within budget.
Services include cleanup of abandoned camp materials, voluntary trash removal from active encampments, and biowaste
removal. The mobile clean team works with the City’s Rapid Intervention Team. Services are provided on public property
except for biowaste removal which is available on private property. In limited circumstances trash removal is also
provided on private property.
Policy questions:
1. Clean Team Funding in the FY2025 Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to evaluate whether
another ongoing funding increase is needed to meet demand for the Clean Team’s Services. The Administration
stated some services are seeing less demand such as the Rio Grande Clean Team and bathroom attendants. The
Council may also wish to ask what is reducing demand for those services and if the need actually reduced, moved
elsewhere, or perhaps there are opportunities for a more proactive cleaning approach.
2. Metrics – Would the Council like additional information about metrics for the Mobile Clean Team?
A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP Holding Account ($15 Million one-time from General Fund Balance
to CIP Fund)
The Finance Department is requesting a one-time transfer of $15 million from General Fund Balance to a CIP holding
account for capital maintenance. This item is to ensure adequate fund balance levels, while also focusing on the financial
need for capital maintenance across the city. The Administration is considering reconvening the CIP resident advisory
board to help determine how best to use these funds in development of the FY2025 CIP budget. The funding
recommendations would come to the Council for approval and release of the funds from the CIP holding account.
The Council’s recent deliberations at the annual retreat, financial risks and reserves analysis briefing, and budget letter to
the Mayor identified deferred maintenance as a top priority for the one-time Fund Balance tens of millions of dollars over
the City’s 13% minimum target. Some specific examples include life and safety projects, energy efficiency, fleet vehicle
replacements and maintenance, traffic safety infrastructure and signage, pavement maintenance, and the large 400 South
bridge project. This proposal would seem to be in line with the Council’s recent retreat discussions about ways to prioritize
one-time money.
Policy questions:
Council role - The Council may wish to confirm with the Administration that the Council will be involved in
decisions about how funds are spent from this account.
Prioritizing capital maintenance – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether other ongoing,
underfunded City needs were considered for this transfer, and how the administration arrived at capital
maintenance as a priority. The Council may wish to understand further the Administration’s definition of “capital
maintenance” to better understand the types of projects this could fund.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
(None)
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
(None)
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Adding Budget for Finance Grant Position – Correction (Transfer of $14,548 from Misc. Grants Fund
and $46,643 from CDBG Fund to General Fund, and $3,000 to IMS Fund)
In Budget Amendment #3 of this fiscal year, budget was added to CDBG and Miscellaneous Grants funds for a Grants-
related position within the Finance department. However, there was a miscommunication, and the budget should not have
been added to CDBG and Misc. Grants. Both of those fund classes already have the maximum amount of budget added for
personnel at the beginning of each fiscal year. What should have happened is the budget and FTE should have been added
within the Finance department as a general fund funded FTE. The expenditures for this position would be periodically
reimbursed by the CDBG and Misc Grant funds after a time-tracking report is submitted justifying a reimbursement.
D-2: Recognizing Overtime Revenue in Budget ($1,736,505 from General Fund)
The Police Department is requesting a budget appropriation for overtime that has associated revenues from special events,
overtime staffing, contracts and task force reimbursements. The amount being requested is based on what has been
received through February conservatively projected through the remainder of the fiscal year.
D-3: Relocate CAN CRAG Funds ($100,000 from General Fund)
On March 19, 2024, during their review of the annual HUD grant awards for FY 2025, Council asked the administration to
evaluate other existing City rental assistance funding sources and return to the Council with options in relation to a
funding gap for Housing Connect's HUD HOPWA program.
This item provides recommendations and potential adjustments to reallocate the unused CAN CRAG funds to address
Housing Connect's funding gap, and to fund another HUD applicant that was ineligible for FY 2025 HUD funds.
- Housing Connect/The Housing Authority of Salt Lake County, HOPWA Program: $27,800
- Neighborhood House, Early Childhood Education Program: $72,200
Both recommendations are eligible activities per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee: Eviction Assistance &
Rent Relief and Expanded Educational Opportunities.
Note: Per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee, all CAN CRAG funds need to be spent by December 31, 2024.
D-4: HOME Dormant Income Transfer (Transfers $3,463,696 from Housing Fund to Misc. Grants Fund)
This housekeeping item moves the remaining HUD HOME dormant program income in the amount of $3,463,696.23 to
the correct fund. Budget is currently posted to the Housing fund. Due to federal grant tracking purposes, as well as
Finance wanting like to consolidate all grants in the grant fund, the department is requesting to move the HOME dormant
program funds to the grant fund. This budget amendment would move existing budget/funds and will have a zero-sum
budgetary impact.
D-5: Housing Authority Payment In Lieu Of Taxes or PILOT Check ($40,000 to General Fund)
The Administration may be requesting a straw poll for this item pending clarification on the arrangement.
The expenditure budget in the Non-Departmental Housing cost center currently sits at $85,000 while a total of $125,000
in expenditures is expected. This amendment will increase the budget to the appropriate level.
D-6: Airport Interest Budget Adjustment ($21,933,876 from Airport Fund)
The Airport initially budgeted $121,528,000 in interest expense based on the gross amount rather than the net value. The
actual forecast amount of interest expense is $142,900,000. This will adjust the Airport’s interest expense budget to
match interest in our debt service schedules rather than net debt service (interest less capitalized interest). This
amendment will budget the $21,933,876 difference from the Airport fund.
D-7: Open Streets 2024 at TBD Location and Times ($250,288 rescope of unused funds from prior year
Downtown Open Main Street events)
The Economic Development Department has identified a total of $250,288 available to be rescoped for Open Streets
events this year. The location, dates, and times are TBD. The Department stated that a different business district would be
selected outside of downtown and the events would likely be held in the fall. The events would be smaller than the
downtown Open Main Street events of the past three years and have a lower total cost. The Department anticipates no
additional funding will be needed. There are three sources for the funding from the past two fiscal years of Open Main
Street events:
- $57,000 remaining from $500,000 approved in Budget Amendment #5 of FY 2023 for the 2023 Open Streets
program
- $69,128 remaining following the completion of the Open Streets 2023 event
- $124,159.60 remaining from the $250,000 approved in Budget Amendment #1 of FY 2024
Policy Questions:
Plans and Total Budget Need for Summer or Fall 2024 Open Streets – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration for an update on plans and total estimated budget needed to operate Open Streets at a new TBD
location. In prior years, the summer events would be run for 15 weeks from Memorial Day to Labor Day, on Main
Street from South Temple to 400 South, and from Noon to 2am on Fridays and Saturdays. Prior year events had
significantly higher costs than $250,000 (double that amount).
Summer vs Fall Timing for Open Streets – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the pros and
cons of holding open streets events in the summer vs the fall. Public feedback from prior years suggested some
businesses and attendees preferred summer events over fall events because of the warmer weather such as more
comfortable outdoor dining arrangements, and the coordination with the greater number of special events
happening at the same time which bring more people (attendees and performers) to the area.
Final Report of Pedestrianizing Main Street Downtown – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an
update on when the final report will be available about options and recommendations to permanently
pedestrianize parts of Main Street from South Temple to 400 South. The study website is www.mainslc.com
Rotating Locations – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether Open Streets events could
be rotated around the city at different business districts.
D-8: Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up ($3,675, 752 from General Fund – One-time)
In late March, staff received an updated memo from the Salt Lake County Auditor. After receiving this memo (Pursuant
to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act”) staff are increasing the revenues and
expenses by $3,675,752 accordingly to account for the final annual distribution. The corresponding memo is attached for
additional detail.
Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources
E-1: WITHDRAWN
Section F: Donations
(None)
Section G: Grant Consent Agenda No. 4
G-1: Department of Environmental Quality – State of Utah – Service Line Inventory ($100,000 from
Misc. Grants Fund)
Department of Public Utilities (DPU) received $100,000 to conduct a service line inventory and produce a lead service line
replacement (LSLR) plan for an estimated 13,894 water line connections in qualifying disadvantage census blocks meeting
the Hardship Funding Criteria of Utah Department of Environmental Quality. On December 16, 2020, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency adopted the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) Act that went into effect on
January 16, 2021, and has a compliance date of October 16, 2024. DPU must complete a service line inventory that
includes publicly owned and customer-owned portions of the service line and develop a lead service line replacement plan
between 2023 and the LCRR compliance date. A public hearing was held May 16, 2023.
Section G: Grant Consent Agenda No. 5
G-1: Safe Streets For All ($953,600 from Misc. Grants Fund)
The Office of the Mayor requested $953,600 for the TravelWell Schools demonstration project on behalf of the nonprofit
Children’s Media Workshop. The project tests and refines a multi-media and digital mapping tool augmented with an
educational campaign to deliver multi-disciplinary messaging aligned with the Safe System Approach targeting
underserved populations, citizen behavioral activities, and community engagement and empowerment.
The anticipated outcome is transformational change through real-time identification of travel behaviors, problems, and
solutions resulting in zero deaths on Salt Lake City roadways. Children’s Media Workshop and Mapps Lab LLC developed
the TravelWell Schools digital mapping tool that the project will test on a small-scale to gauge effectiveness and assess for
inclusion in the Safe Streets for All Action Plan under development by Wasatch Front Regional Council. Children’s Media
Workshop has committed to providing the full $238,400 worth in non-federal match, which is often required for grants.
This amount is strictly for the City’s grant match; however, it will not pass through or need to be budgeted for by the City.
A public hearing was held November 7, 2023.
G-2: Marathon Petroleum – Drone Funding ($4,532 from Misc. Grants Fund)
Funding will provide for the purchase of a drone to train first responders and prepare for an emergency response. The
public hearing was held January 16, 2024.
G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Grant ($600,068 from Misc. Grants Fund)
This funding is for the Salt Lake Metro Narcotics Task Force. This contract is for salaries and fringe for existing Salt
Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator. Funding will also support overtime for
outside agencies that participate in the task force. Other expenses: travel, K9 contracts, supplies, equipment and other
administrative costs. The public hearing was held March 5, 2024.
G-4: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant ($9,280 from Misc. Grants Fund)
The Salt Lake City Police Department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of
Forensic Services (UBFS) application for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The
state’s application includes $9,280 for the Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2023 Annual Accreditation Fee
through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. The public hearing was held June 6, 2023.
Section I: Council-Added Items
(None)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Potential New Ongoing General Fund Costs Approved in Midyear Budget Amendments (Chart)
ACRONYMS
ADU – Accessory Dwelling Unit
ANAB – ANSI National Accreditation Board
CAN – Department of Community and Neighborhoods
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
CIP – Capital Improvement Program Fund
CRAG – Community Recover Assistance Grants
DPU – Department of Public Utilities
FTE – Full Time Employee
FY – Fiscal Year
FOF – Funding Our Future
GF – General Fund
HOPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids
HUD – Department of Housing & Urban Development
IFFP – Impact Fee Facilities Plan
IMS – Information Management Services
Misc. – Miscellaneous
RDA – Redevelopment Agency
RFA – Request For Appropriation
RFP – Request For Proposal
SAA – Special Assessment Area
UBFS – Utah Bureau of Forensic Services
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Request:
Council staff has provided the following list of potential new ongoing costs to the General Fund. Many of these are new
FTE’s approved during this fiscal year’s budget amendments, noting that each new FTE increases the City’s annual budget
costs if positions are added to the staffing document. Note that some items in the table below are partially or fully funded
by grants. If a grant continues to be awarded to the City in future years, then there may not be a cost to the General Fund
but grant funding is not guaranteed year-over-year.
Budget
Amendment Item
Potential
Cost to
FY2025
Annual
Budget
Full Time Employee
(FTEs) Notes
#2
Item A-1:
Homeless
General Fund
Reallocation Cost
Share for State
Homeless
Mitigation Grant
$53,544
0.5 FTE Community
Development
Grant Specialist for
Homelessness
Engagement and
Response Team
(HEART)
This position is proposed to be half
funded from the State Homeless
Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant and half
by the General Fund for FY2024. The
$107,088 reflects the fully loaded
annual cost for the FTE.
#2
Item A-5: Create
a Public Lands
Planning &
Design Division $12,113
Reclassify an existing
FTE to a higher pay
grade and director of
new division. Request
position be appointed
in a future budget
opening.
Transfer all four (4) full-time landscape
architect positions and associated
operating budget ($543,144) from the
Engineering Division (Public Services
Department) to this new division in the
Public Lands Department. Returned as
item D-1 in Budget Amendment #4
#2
A-6 Sorenson
Janitorial and
County Contract -
Senior
Community
Programs
Manager
Budget
Neutral
(see note to
the right)
1 Senior Community
Programs Manager
This item requires amending an
existing interlocal agreement with the
County. At the time of publishing this
report, staff is checking whether the
amendment could result in additional
funding needs to maintain current
levels of service. The item might not be
budget neutral depending on the
agreement changes.
#2
A-7: Economic
Development
Project Manager
Position
$122,000
1 Economic
Development Project
Manager
Would be focused on the creation of
Special Assessment Areas or SAAs for
business districts and renewal every
three to five years.
#2 A-9: Know Your
Neighbor
Program
Expenses
$6,500
Program expenses were inadvertently
left out of the last annual budget
#2 A-10: Love Your
Block Program
Expenses
$55,750
Program expenses were inadvertently
left out of the last annual budget
Budget
Amendment Item
Potential
Cost to
FY2025
Annual
Budget
Full Time Employee
(FTEs) Notes
#2
Item E-3:
Homeless Shelter
Cities Mitigation
Grant Award
$3,107,201
13 Existing FTEs:
- 2 Police sergeants
- 10 police officers
- 1 Business &
community liaison
4.5 New FTEs:
- 1 Sequential Intercept
Case Manager in the
Justice Court
- 0.5 Grant Specialist in
CAN (half grant funded
and half by the General
Fund in item above)
- 1 Police sergeant
- 2 police officers
Admin expects to apply for grant
funding annually to cover these costs.
General Fund would not need to cover
costs if the State grant is awarded to
the City to fully cover the costs.
Note: Justice Court FTE is part of the
City’s contribution towards
implementation of the “Miami Model”
of diversion out of the homelessness
system.
#2
G-1: Greater Salt
Lake Area Clean
Energy and Air
Roadmap
Coordinator
Position
$482,915
(funding is
to cover
four years
of new FTE)
1 Coordinator
Four years of salary and benefits. The
position would be responsible for
facilitating the sustained involvement
of jurisdiction partners, managing
consultants, assisting with community
engagement, coordinating stakeholder
and public engagement activities and
presentations, and tracking task
completion and achievement.
#3
A-1: Fire
Department (4
New FTEs) $292,638
4 New Medical
Response Paramedic
FTEs
Annual cost; this assumes the Fire
Department requests two new entry
level firefighters to replace the two that
were converted into civilian paramedics
#3
A-4 City
Attorney’s Office
Legislative
Division (4 New
FTEs) $594,441
Legislative Affairs
Director (E34) • Senior
City Attorney (E39) •
Special Projects Analyst
(E26) • Administrative
Assistant (N21) Focus
on legislative affairs,
with special emphasis
on the legislative
session
Annual cost
#3 A-9: Adding
Multimodal
Specialized Road
Markings
Maintenance
Funding into the
Streets Division’s
Base Budget
$200,000
#3 A-10: Downtown
Parking Pay
Station
Replacements
$271,985
Would be paid annually over six fiscal
years from FY2025 – FY2030. The
Council left Budget Amendment #3
open to consider this item later
#4 A-2: Short-term
Rental $49,000
Budget
Amendment Item
Potential
Cost to
FY2025
Annual
Budget
Full Time Employee
(FTEs) Notes
Identification
Software
#4 A-4: Liberty Park
Greenhouses $62,500
#4 A-7: Increase
Fleet
Maintenance
Capacity $312,585 3 New Mechanics
3 new FTE mechanics,
education/training,
software/hardware, maintenance from
outside vendor. Request to finish this
fiscal year is $399,909.
#4 A-8: Police
Officer Overtime $1,829,000 This item would double the annual line
item for police officer overtime
#5 A-2: Police
Recruitment and
Retention
Ongoing
amount of
$264,500
#3 & #5 D-1: Adding
Budget for
Finance Grant
Position -
Correction
$116,382 1 FTE
Budget was mistakenly added to CDBG
and Misc Grants. The General Fund
will front the cost for the FTE and later
the grants will reimburse the General
Fund for eligible expenses
TOTALS $7,568,554 33 FTEs of which 20
are New
Salt Lake City
Revenue Update
SLC City Council Update 04/16/2024
FY24 Revenue Projection
Revenue
FY23-24 Amended
Budget
New Projection through
March 2024
Amended Variance
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
Revenue
Property Taxes 131,752,713 131,752,713 -
Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 117,129,000 114,465,900 (2,663,100)
Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 13,273,330 925,203
Total Taxes 261,229,840 259,491,943 (1,737,897)
Revenue
Charges For Services 4,745,443 5,938,036 1,192,593
Fines & Forfeitures 2,571,547 2,607,446 35,899
Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 -
Interfund Service Charges 26,131,213 26,041,511 (89,702)
Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,159,621 25,000
Licenses 18,434,301 18,438,665 4,364
Miscellaneous Revenue 2,948,012 2,966,118 18,106
Parking Meter Revenue 2,801,089 2,801,089 -
Parking Tickets 1,500,000 1,499,955 (45)
Permits 22,445,026 22,487,608 42,582
Property Sale Proceeds - - -
Rental & Other Income 681,604 1,101,203 419,599
Gain on Property Dispositions - - -
Operating Transfers In 10,130,410 10,130,410 -
Total W/O Special Tax 105,523,266 107,171,662 1,648,396
ObjectCodeDescription
Sales Tax Addition 1/2%49,084,479 52,800,000 3,715,521
Total General Fund 415,837,585 419,463,605 3,626,020
*est
Sales Tax Revenue and Budget
FY July August September October November December January
2024 (millions)6.70$ 7.57$ 8.15$ 6.88$ 8.83$ 7.03$ 7.04$
2023 (millions)6.63$ 7.78$ 8.28$ 7.04$ 7.81$ 8.12$ 6.65$
YoY Chg (millions)0.07$ (0.21)$ (0.12)$ (0.16)$ 1.02$ (1.09)$ 0.39$
YoY % Chg 1% -3% -1% -2% 13% -13% 6%
*Sales Tax Revenue: Post Distribution
FY Comparison 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Actuals (millions)64.897$ 66.324$ 73.778$ 86.533$ 89.091$ 88.000$
% Change 2% 11% 17% 3% -1%
Budget (millions)62.951$ 65.350$ 62.050$ 68.120$ 83.500$ 92.500$
% Change 4% -5% 10% 23% 11%
In millions
YTD Sales Tax Receipts
By Major Sector
* By Budget Period
YTD
July 2023 - January 2024 sales_tax YoY Chg sales_tax YoY Chg
Sector Name (millions)(millions)(millions)(millions)
Retail Trade 27.741$ 0.779$ 3% 39% 28.047$ 0.305$ 1% 40%
Wholesale Trade 9.587$ 1.175$ 14% 14% 8.526$ (1.061)$ -11% 12%
Accommodation and Food Services 8.886$ 1.614$ 22% 13% 9.123$ 0.237$ 3% 13%
Manufacturing 5.257$ 0.709$ 16% 7% 4.509$ (0.748)$ -14% 7%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 2.791$ (0.512)$ -16% 4% 2.782$ (0.009)$ 0% 4%
Information 3.298$ 0.230$ 8% 5% 3.119$ (0.179)$ -5% 5%
Utilities 2.335$ 0.638$ 38% 3% 2.347$ 0.012$ 1% 3%
*other sectors shown in appendix
Total 70.703$ 5.615$ 9%1 69.263$ (1.439)$ -2%1
FY23 FY24
YoY %
Chg
% of
Total
YoY %
Chg
% of
Total
Prior Year Current Year
•Is retail making a come back?
•Manufacturing is not as resilient as retail.
•Acc and food services flattened out and trending down
•Wholesale Trade is trending down since its peak (Q2 2023)
Quarter Trends
*Sales Tax Collection: Pre-Distribution
Trends Looking Forward
Key Points
•Funding Our Future Sales Tax Revenue is
trending over budget.
Trends
•Will retail keep a strong trend?
•Can the other major sectors rebound as
well?
•Interest Rates will remain higher for
longer.
•Inflation slowed but prices remain high.
•The labor market is softening but resilient.
*Sales Tax Revenue: Post Distribution
FY Comparison 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Actuals (millions)64.897$ 66.324$ 73.778$ 86.533$ 89.091$ 88.000$
% Change 2% 11% 17% 3% -1%
Budget (millions)62.951$ 65.350$ 62.050$ 68.120$ 83.500$ 92.500$ 94.500$
% Change 4% -5% 10% 23% 11% 2%
Appendix
Appendix
YTD July 2023 - January 2024 2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 27,741,357 778,960 3% 39.2% 28,046,761 305,404 1% 40.5%
Wholesale Trade 9,587,173 1,174,996 14% 13.6% 8,526,143 (1,061,029) -11% 12.3%
Accommodation and Food Services 8,885,858 1,614,324 22% 12.6% 9,122,934 237,077 3% 13.2%
Manufacturing 5,256,997 708,553 16% 7.4% 4,509,008 (747,990) -14% 6.5%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 2,790,775 (511,934) -16% 3.9% 2,781,673 (9,102) 0% 4.0%
Information 3,297,858 230,477 8% 4.7% 3,119,260 (178,598) -5% 4.5%
Utilities 2,334,701 638,023 38% 3.3% 2,346,994 12,293 1% 3.4%
Other Services (except Public Administration)1,938,533 (51,364) -3% 2.7% 1,978,393 39,860 2% 2.9%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 2,090,818 159,418 8% 3.0% 2,194,797 103,979 5% 3.2%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 1,898,902 106,810 6% 2.7% 1,748,539 (150,363) -8% 2.5%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 1,295,567 87,453 7% 1.8% 1,674,307 378,740 29% 2.4%
Construction 1,250,302 148,368 13% 1.8% 1,116,859 (133,444) -11% 1.6%
Noncategorized (66,309) 135,334 -67% -0.1% (267,183) (200,874) 303% -0.4%
Motor Vehicle 555,680 (68,264) -11% 0.8% 592,980 37,300 7% 0.9%
Finance and Insurance 382,864 25,860 7% 0.5% 392,087 9,223 2% 0.6%
Transportation and Warehousing 597,676 268,334 81% 0.8% 510,972 (86,704) -15% 0.7%
Educational Services 330,734 55,297 20% 0.5% 360,516 29,782 9% 0.5%
Special Events 224,236 38,800 21% 0.3% 254,349 30,114 13% 0.4%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 95,419 27,114 40% 0.1% 44,740 (50,679) -53% 0.1%
Health Care and Social Assistance 79,840 (41,398) -34% 0.1% 57,702 (22,138) -28% 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 73,623 32,455 79% 0.1% 75,243 1,620 2% 0.1%
Public Administration 58,547 57,020 3735% 0.1% 68,537 9,990 17% 0.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 1,419 545 62% 0.0% 7,882 6,462 455% 0.0%
Grand Total 70,702,570 5,615,181 9% 100.0% 69,263,494 (1,439,076) -2% 100.0%
By Sector: July – January Sales Receipts
Appendix
October - December (Cal 4th Q)2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 12,194,475 46,208 0% 39.3% 12,459,287 264,811 2% 41.4%
Wholesale Trade 4,220,952 401,713 11% 13.6% 3,659,828 (561,124) -13% 12.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 3,797,395 664,394 21% 12.2% 3,874,539 77,144 2% 12.9%
Manufacturing 2,333,386 354,502 18% 7.5% 1,937,668 (395,718) -17% 6.4%
Information 1,510,197 173,206 13% 4.9% 1,362,095 (148,102) -10% 4.5%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,102,466 (276,402) -20% 3.6% 1,070,564 (31,902) -3% 3.6%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 960,750 77,623 9% 3.1% 1,069,696 108,946 11% 3.6%
Other Services (except Public Administration)794,197 (37,684) -5% 2.6% 890,556 96,360 12% 3.0%
Utilities 946,589 300,854 47% 3.1% 1,001,044 54,456 6% 3.3%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 780,129 117,067 18% 2.5% 797,676 17,547 2% 2.6%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 931,872 164,709 21% 3.0% 806,386 (125,486) -13% 2.7%
Construction 489,439 (60,592) -11% 1.6% 477,238 (12,201) -2% 1.6%
Noncategorized (36,181) 30,912 -46% -0.1% (137,572) (101,391) 280% -0.5%
Motor Vehicle 222,289 (16,272) -7% 0.7% 143,927 (78,362) -35% 0.5%
Finance and Insurance 156,910 1,882 1% 0.5% 176,966 20,056 13% 0.6%
Transportation and Warehousing 235,559 37,372 19% 0.8% 219,452 (16,107) -7% 0.7%
Educational Services 133,741 24,742 23% 0.4% 144,665 10,924 8% 0.5%
Special Events 95,596 48,634 104% 0.3% 39,194 (56,403) -59% 0.1%
Health Care and Social Assistance 40,988 (22,719) -36% 0.1% 27,113 (13,875) -34% 0.1%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 40,835 10,051 33% 0.1% 21,791 (19,044) -47% 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 42,784 27,781 185% 0.1% 39,959 (2,825) -7% 0.1%
Public Administration 22,078 21,086 2124% 0.1% 24,129 2,051 9% 0.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 593 250 73% 0.0% 1,475 882 149% 0.0%
Grand Total 31,017,039 2,089,316 7% 100.0% 30,107,677 (909,362) -3% 100.0%
By Sector: October – December Sales Receipts
Appendix
December 2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 4,444,898 (421,259) -9% 40.6% 4,185,815 (259,083) -6% 45.5%
Accommodation and Food Services 1,403,275 179,333 15% 12.8% 1,203,135 (200,140) -14% 13.1%
Wholesale Trade 1,349,081 71,179 6% 12.3% 993,736 (355,345) -26% 10.8%
Manufacturing 795,426 (14,331) -2% 7.3% 611,588 (183,838) -23% 6.6%
Information 565,384 49,342 10% 5.2% 455,613 (109,772) -19% 5.0%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 395,159 (238,372) -38% 3.6% 314,132 (81,027) -21% 3.4%
Utilities 429,058 187,566 78% 3.9% 381,097 (47,960) -11% 4.1%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 383,640 (25,641) -6% 3.5% 296,735 (86,905) -23% 3.2%
Other Services (except Public Administration)262,680 (96,074) -27% 2.4% 242,925 (19,755) -8% 2.6%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 242,236 5,550 2% 2.2% 266,115 23,880 10% 2.9%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 184,867 (158,173) -46% 1.7% 70,686 (114,181) -62% 0.8%
Construction 162,184 (41,239) -20% 1.5% 123,797 (38,387) -24% 1.3%
Noncategorized (6,790) 42,486 -86% -0.1% (132,552) (125,762) 1852% -1.4%
Finance and Insurance 45,694 (12,731) -22% 0.4% 49,933 4,239 9% 0.5%
Transportation and Warehousing 86,880 (25,180) -22% 0.8% 63,787 (23,093) -27% 0.7%
Motor Vehicle 68,999 (19,051) -22% 0.6%(68,999) #NULL!0.0%
Educational Services 45,400 2,662 6% 0.4% 44,727 (674) -1% 0.5%
Special Events 57,762 37,731 188% 0.5% 4,271 (53,491) -93% 0.0%
Health Care and Social Assistance 18,402 (11,918) -39% 0.2% 14,649 (3,753) -20% 0.2%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 465 (9,548) -95% 0.0% 1,805 1,340 288% 0.0%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 10,146 4,045 66% 0.1%825 (9,321) -92% 0.0%
Public Administration 9,541 8,643 962% 0.1% 9,994 453 5% 0.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 223 103 86% 0.0%578 355 160% 0.0%
Grand Total 10,954,609 (484,879) -4% 100.0% 9,203,389 (1,751,220) -16% 100.0%
By Sector: December Sales Receipts
Appendix By Sector: January Sales Receipts
January 2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 3,658,024 159,527 5% 40.9% 3,566,253 (91,771) -3% 38.2%
Wholesale Trade 1,172,741 (50,718) -4% 13.1% 1,234,567 61,826 5% 13.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 1,233,275 333,259 37% 13.8% 1,302,025 68,750 6% 14.0%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 396,724 12,722 3% 4.4% 388,135 (8,588) -2% 4.2%
Manufacturing 493,896 40,437 9% 5.5% 440,315 (53,580) -11% 4.7%
Utilities 504,646 164,100 48% 5.6% 450,428 (54,218) -11% 4.8%
Information 372,233 (64,526) -15% 4.2% 378,987 6,753 2% 4.1%
Other Services (except Public Administration)229,103 (16,443) -7% 2.6% 260,376 31,272 14% 2.8%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 223,520 (25,865) -10% 2.5% 259,954 36,435 16% 2.8%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 63,605 (198,093) -76% 0.7% 320,394 256,789 404% 3.4%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 254,718 (9,632) -4% 2.8% 231,189 (23,529) -9% 2.5%
Construction 88,710 (12,607) -12% 1.0% 170,034 81,325 92% 1.8%
Motor Vehicle 92,079 (8,939) -9% 1.0% 148,396 56,317 61% 1.6%
Noncategorized (22,766) (43,586) -209% -0.3% (130,302) (107,536) 472% -1.4%
Finance and Insurance 58,509 10,833 23% 0.7% 54,746 (3,764) -6% 0.6%
Educational Services 36,198 12,326 52% 0.4% 79,774 43,576 120% 0.9%
Transportation and Warehousing 77,386 56,352 268% 0.9% 72,618 (4,768) -6% 0.8%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 8,325 (893) -10% 0.1% 4,789 (3,536) -42% 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,689 (839) -33% 0.0% 18,724 17,035 1008% 0.2%
Special Events (3,261) (16,206) -125% 0.0% 72,529 75,789 -2324% 0.8%
Health Care and Social Assistance 7,236 (2,907) -29% 0.1% 4,516 (2,720) -38% 0.0%
Public Administration 2,667 2,675 -36441% 0.0% 3,272 604 23% 0.0%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 138 (10) -7% 0.0%284 146 106% 0.0%
Grand Total 8,949,396 340,966 4% 100.0% 9,332,003 382,607 4% 100.0%
Appendix By Major Sector: Quarterly Sales Receipts
FY of Sale Quarter Retail Trade Accommodation and Food Services Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Information Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Utilities
2019 Qtr1 8,840,669 3,229,510 2,819,637 1,437,880 889,999 1,330,696 650,949
2019 Qtr2 8,980,389 2,977,822 3,125,970 1,600,378 908,116 1,101,265 595,041
2019 Qtr3 8,035,452 3,230,430 2,687,025 1,188,545 918,359 1,175,153 784,179
2019 Qtr4 8,920,143 3,303,139 2,668,238 1,324,535 841,227 1,236,248 589,312
2020 Qtr1 9,126,149 3,103,933 2,671,128 1,449,950 847,159 1,243,391 659,085
2020 Qtr2 9,673,538 2,939,158 2,972,407 1,467,426 974,516 1,043,266 601,858
2020 Qtr3 8,533,575 2,347,658 2,772,559 1,380,079 1,063,300 1,160,602 833,627
2020 Qtr4 9,130,173 1,359,433 2,530,010 1,533,402 924,486 746,459 572,884
2021 Qtr1 9,805,006 1,923,870 3,037,084 1,618,560 987,372 1,046,595 654,253
2021 Qtr2 10,711,287 1,822,128 3,133,787 1,766,834 1,155,358 908,556 595,245
2021 Qtr3 10,002,144 2,197,624 3,034,731 1,683,342 1,107,001 1,184,735 830,309
2021 Qtr4 11,292,340 2,985,179 3,887,127 1,802,172 1,076,364 1,511,988 598,603
2022 Qtr1 11,315,632 3,238,517 3,369,479 2,116,102 1,293,631 1,539,839 710,396
2022 Qtr2 12,148,267 3,133,000 3,819,239 1,978,884 1,336,991 1,378,868 645,735
2022 Qtr3 11,315,774 3,379,011 3,827,142 1,887,582 1,324,437 1,523,307 977,741
2022 Qtr4 11,636,854 3,653,526 4,106,633 1,980,554 1,182,880 1,381,584 779,372
2023 Qtr1 11,888,857 3,855,188 4,193,480 2,429,716 1,415,427 1,291,586 883,466
2023 Qtr2 12,194,475 3,797,395 4,220,952 2,333,386 1,510,197 1,102,466 946,589
2023 Qtr3 11,130,137 4,113,711 3,897,920 1,635,056 1,329,046 1,324,938 1,314,263
2023 Qtr4 11,411,870 4,018,756 3,927,290 2,013,275 1,327,088 1,184,530 842,125
2024 Qtr1 12,021,221 3,946,371 3,631,749 2,131,024 1,378,178 1,322,974 895,521
2024 Qtr2 12,459,287 3,874,539 3,659,828 1,937,668 1,362,095 1,070,564 1,001,044
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATESTREET
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKECITY, UTAH 84114-5455
CITYCOUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________Date Received: _______________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: __________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 2, 2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:FY24 Budget Amendment #5
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT:Greg Cleary (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE:Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2024 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $5,513,448.00 $32,816,721.73
AIRPORT FUND 0.00 21,933,876.00
CIP FUND 18,450,000.00 3,527,775.33
LOAN FUND 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00
IMS FUND 3,000.00 3,000.00
CDBG FUND 0.00 (46,643.00)
MISC GRANTS FUND 1,667,480.10 5,116,628.33
TOTAL $32,633,928.10 $70,351,358.39
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2024 Budget Adjustments
The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2024.
To date, revenues are trending slightly above initial budget. At this time, Finance staff are
projecting revenues to remaining consistent with current estimates for the remainder of FY 2024.
Modifications have been made primarily to Sales Tax, resulting in a decrease of approximately
$2.6 million, while an increase in revenue is projected in the Sales Tax Additional ½ % by an
estimated $3.7 million.
The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes
included in Budget Amendment #5.
With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #5, the available fund balance will adjust to 28.12 percent
of the FY 2024 Adopted Budget.
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $32,633,928.10 in revenue and
$70,351,358.39 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in seven (7) funds, with no
change to FTEs in the city. The proposal includes ten (10) initiatives for Council review and
additional housekeeping and grant related items.
A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration
requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
1
Memo
TO: City Council leadership
DATE: February 2, 2024
FROM: Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy
SUBECT FY25 Proposed Increase to the Certified Tax Rate
CC: MWDSLS Board of Trustees
ISSUES
The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (“District”) needs an increase in revenue to
address critical water infrastructure and to pay for the cost increases from other entities (i.e., Central
Utah Water Conservancy District, Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District, and Provo River Water
Users Association). The following is a summary of these critical capital projects and costs from other
entities:
Description Annual Cost Type of
Expense
Long-Term
Financial Impact
Entity responsible
for securing
funding
Cottonwoods Connection Project
(District/SLC/SC)
Purpose: Required project to
address aging infrastructure and Salt
Lake Aqueduct seismic and other
elements of resiliency.
$2,276,800 Capital $41.5 Million
(repayment of 30
year loan/bond)
Metropolitan Water
District of Salt Lake
& Sandy
Deer Creek Dam Intake Project
(PRWUA costs)
Purpose: Required project to
replace aging dam infrastructure
that delivers 85,000 AF of water
(80% of water portfolio) to the Salt
Lake Valley.
$1,240,000 Capital $37 Million
(30 years
repayment)
Provo River Water
Users Association
Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley
Water Treatment Plant Capital and
O&M (JVWCD costs)
Purpose: Address aging
infrastructure that delivers water to
Northwest quadrant of Salt Lake
City.
$5,023,680
(5 year
average)
Capital and
O&M
$32.5 Million
(10 years of
capital projects)
Jordan Valley Water
Conservancy District
Central Utah Project OMR&R
(CUWCD costs)
Purpose: Expenses related to the
District’s investment in Central Utah
Project water.
$1,501,500 O&M and
repair and
replacement
of CUP
facilities
$6.9 Million
(forecasted target
increase)
Central Utah Water
Conservancy District
Total $9,371,370 $117.9 Million
2
RECOMMENDATION
To meet the District’s revenue needs, the board of trustees recommends increasing the certified tax rate
to 0.00035. By way of information, the District’s maximum tax rate is 0.0005.
In 2008, the District increased the certified rate to 0.00035. Over time, the rate has eroded as the value
of properties has increased. Since 2008, the District has not implemented a certified rate increase. Taxes
are a reliable source of revenue and the investment in water infrastructure projects will benefit future
generations. The investment in capital projects that will last more than 75 years supports generational
equity.
AUTHORIZATION FROM SALT LAKE CITY AND SANDY COUNCILS
As of January 1, 2015 current statute (17B-2a-608) states than increasing the certified tax rate requires
approval by “the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the board of trustees
under Section 17B-2a-604.” The appointed board of trustees of the Metropolitan Water District of Salt
Lake & Sandy must receive approval from their appointed authority to increase the certified tax rate to
0.00035.
The timing of the city councils’ approving the District’s certified tax rate needs to occur after the District
adopts the tentative FY25 budget on April 15, 2024 and before the budget public hearing on May 20,
2024. The statutory deadline for budget adoption is June 22, 2024.
With the approval of both city councils, the certified rate would increase as budgeted and be formally
adopted after a Truth in Taxation hearing in August.
A question to be resolved is how the two cities want to present the tax increase to their councils for
approval.
Attachment A describes in more detail the statutory requirements of each city council.
CONCENSUS FROM CITY COUNCILS
There must be consensus from both councils and each city will be taxed at a uniform and equal rate. If
either council does not approve an increase to the certified tax rate, then the District will propose an
increase to the water rate. The water rate must also be uniformly applied to all cities comprising this
District. The District will propose an 39.33% water rate increase to both member cities (36.33%
generates the revenue equal to the property tax and the 3% water rate increase was already forecasted
in the FY25 budget).
Table 1 calculates the annual impact of an increase to the certified tax rate to Sandy City and Salt Lake
City property owners. On average, a property owner in the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake &
Sandy’s service area would see an annual property tax increase of $47.00.
3
Table 2 represents the net revenue generated from the certified tax rate increase. The District would
receive an additional $8.6 million in tax revenue. Table 2 also shows the estimated tax revenue from
each member city.
Table 3 represents the current water sales revenue and the projected water rate increase of 36.33% to
match the revenue net revenue increase of the proposed property tax.
Table 1: Annual impact of property tax increase to Property Owner
City Median
Market
Value of
Property
Taxable
Home Value
(55% of
median)
Current
Year Tax
Rate
Proposed
Next Year
Certified Tax
Rate
Percent
Increase
Annual
Increase to
property
owner
Monthly
increase
Sandy $628,000 $345,400 0.000216 0.00035 62.04% $46.28 $3.86
Salt Lake $576,000 $316,800 0.000200 0.00035 75.00% $47.52 $3.96
Table 2: Dollar amount generated from an increase in the certified tax rate
City 2023 Tax
Year Certified
Tax Rate
2023 Tax
Revenue
Proposed
Certified Tax
Rate
Estimated 2024
Tax Revenue
Net Revenue
Increase
Sandy City 0.000216 $3,010,170 0.00035 $ 4,877,590 $1,867,420
Salt Lake City 0.000200 $9,030,509 0.00035 $15,802,603 $6,772,094
Total MWDSLS
Taxes
$12,040,679
0.00035
$20,680,193
$8,639,514
Table 3: Dollar amount generated from an increase to water rates
City FY24 Water
Sales Revenue
Percent
Increase
Estimated FY25 Water
Sales Revenue
Net Revenue Increase
Sandy City $ 6,658,388 36.33% $ 9,077,381 $2,418,993
Salt Lake City $17,121,570 36.33% $23,341,836 $6,220,266
Total MWDSLS
Water Sales to
Member Cities
$23,779,958
36.33%
$32,419,217
$8,639,259
FY25 Property Tax
Certified Rate Increase
Proposal
Salt Lake City Council Meeting
April 2, 2024
Background
The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake &
Sandy is a special district that provides
drinking water to Salt Lake City and Sandy
City.
Sandy City joined the District in 1990.
The District’s board is comprised of seven
trustees.
The Salt Lake City Council appoints five of the
trustees.
The Sandy City Council appoints two of the
trustees.
Revenue Sources
25.113236
12.040679
12.93062
1.105537
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Water Sales Property Taxes Assessments Miscellaneous
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
o
f
d
o
l
l
a
r
s
FY25 Escalating Costs and Capital
Needs for Aging Infrastructure
Description Annual Cost Type of Expense Long-Term
Financial Impact
Entity responsible for securing
funding
Cottonwoods Connection Project
(District/SLC/SC)
Purpose: Required project to address aging
infrastructure and Salt Lake Aqueduct seismic
and other elements of resiliency.
$2,276,800 Capital $41.5 Million
(repayment of 30
year loan/bond)
Metropolitan Water District of Salt
Lake & Sandy
Deer Creek Dam Intake Project (PRWUA costs)
Purpose: Required project to replace aging dam
infrastructure that delivers 85,000 AF of water
(80% of water portfolio) to the Salt Lake Valley.
$1,240,000 Capital $37 Million
(30 years repayment)
Provo River Water Users
Association
Jordan Aqueduct/Jordan Valley Water
Treatment Plant Capital and O&M (JVWCD
costs)
Purpose: Address aging infrastructure that
delivers water to Northwest quadrant of Salt
Lake City.
$5,023,680
(5 year average)
Capital and O&M $32.5 Million
(10 years of capital
projects)
Jordan Valley Water Conservancy
District
Central Utah Project OMR&R (CUWCD costs)
Purpose: Expenses related to the District’s
investment in Central Utah Project water.
$1,501,500 O&M and repair
and replacement
of CUP facilities
$6.9 Million
(forecasted target
increase)
Central Utah Water Conservancy
District
Total $9,371,370 $117.9 Million
$9.3M of revenue needs
FY25 Tentative Budget
Table 1: Annual impact of property tax increase to Property Owner
City
Median Market
Value of
Property
Taxable Home
Value (55% of
Median)
Current Year
Tax Rate
Current
MWDSLS Tax
(Annual)
Proposed Next
Year Certified
Tax Rate
Percent
Increase
MWDSLS
Tax
(Annual)
Net
Annual
Increase
Sandy City $628,000 $345,400 0.000216 $74.61 0.00035 62.04% $120.89 $46.28
Salt Lake City $576,000 $316,000 0.000200 $63.36 0.00035 75.00% $110.88 $47.52
Property Taxes versus Water Rates
Table 2: Dollar amount generated from an increase in the certified tax rate
City 2023 Tax Year
Certified Tax
Rate
2023 Tax
Revenue
Proposed
Certified Tax
Rate
Estimated 2024
Tax Revenue
Net Revenue
Increase
Sandy City 0.000216 $3,010,170 0.00035 $ 4,877,590 $1,867,420
Salt Lake City 0.000200 $9,030,509 0.00035 $15,802,603 $6,772,094
Total MWDSLS
Taxes $12,040,679 0.00035 $20,680,193 $8,639,514
Table 3:Dollar amount generated from an increase to water rates
City FY24 Water
Sales Revenue
Percent
Increase
Estimated FY25 Water
Sales Revenue
Net Revenue Increase
Sandy City $ 6,658,388 36.33%$ 9,077,381 $2,418,993
Salt Lake City $17,121,570 36.33%$23,341,836 $6,220,266
Total MWDSLS Water
Sales to Member
Cities
$23,779,958 36.33%$32,419,217 $8,639,259
Council’s decision will determine if there is an increase to the certified tax
rate. If not approved by either council, the District will increase water rates to
both member cities.
MWDSLS Property Taxes versus Water Rates
Table 4: Certified tax rate increased to 0.00035
City
2023 Tax
Revenue
Estimated
2024 Tax
Revenue
Net Revenue
Increase
Sandy City $3,010,170 $4,877,590 $1,867,420
Salt Lake City $9,030,509 $15,802,603 $6,772,094
Total MWDSLS Taxes $12,040,679 $20,680,193 $8,639,514
Table 5: Water rates increased by 36.33%
City
FY24 Water
Sales
Revenue
Estimated
FY25 Water
S ales
Revenue
Net Revenue
Increase
Sandy City $6,658,388 $9,077,381 $2,418,993
Salt Lake City $17,121,570 $23,341,836 $6,220,266
Total MWDSLS Water Sales $23,779,958 $32,419,217 $8,639,259
Background on Budget Process
Tentative revenue and expenses projections
Proposed certified tax rate of 0.00035
Open public meeting
Work Session Presentation on FY25 Budget
Posted FY25 Tentative Budget on Website
Open public meeting
FY25 Tentative Budget Adopted by the Board
Statute 17B-2a-608
Requirements
Consistent with current statute (17B-2a-608), increasing the certified tax rate requires
approval by “the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the
board of trustees under Section 17B-2a-604.”
Salt Lake City and Sandy City Council must approve increasing the certified tax rate.
Approval occurs after the District adopts tentative budget in April and before the
District’s public hearing in May.
Consensus required.
Member Cities agreement requires equal application of certified tax rate and water
rates.
Note: MWDSLS Board of Trustees will evaluate property tax rate every 2 years and
determine if the District needs to re-establish or increase property tax rate every 3
years.
FY25 Budget Process Timing Considerations
March
•Work Session Discussion on Budget. Open public meeting
April
•Board approval of the tentative budget
May
•Tentative budget public hearing
June
•Board meeting to approve FY25 budget.
April/May
•City Councils approve District’s increase to certified tax rate
August
•Certified tax
rate hearing
•Adoption of final
tax rate and
FY25 budget.
September
•Deadline
for
submitting
budget to
State
Auditor.
Thank you
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 3/28/2024
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 3/28/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/28/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Business Advisory Board
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Business Advisory Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Isaac Atencio member of the
Business Advisory Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
March 28, 2024
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Dear Council Member Petro,
Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Business Advisory
Board.
Isaac Atencio to be appointed for a four year term starting from date of City Council advice and
consent and ending on Monday, December 25, 2028.
I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/3/2024 7:19 Reese Wilson Homelessness, feeling unsafe in my own
neighborhood and city
I can understand what is being done about the homelessness in SLC. From what I can find, there is a temporary
shelter open for the winter, but no sustainable, long term plans. My fisnce just moved from San Fransico and feels
less safe here. We walked to pioneer park yesterday and there were probably 30 homeless people. 4 were
practically guarding the park right at the entrance and a whole gang of them were in the middle of the park. One
man was running around with his pants completely down. As mayor, how can you be okay with this happening at
the hub of the neighborhood, where people and their KIDS should be able to hang out and play. It’s like this every
single day. When I walk with my finance im constantly looking over my shoulder and judging the characters I see
as potential threats. My friends parents just visited their youngest son at the U, and they were accosted multiple
times by homeless people during their stay in downtown. This is a small city relatively and there is homeless
people on every corner.
4/3/2024 14:59 Janiece Murray Please call for an immediate ceasefire {contact_data~salutation,} I write to you as a constituent and as a member of Amnesty International USA with
deep concern over the escalating conflict in Gaza and Israel. The U.S. government – including at the local level –
is uniquely positioned to have tremendous impact in this conflict to ensure the protection of civilians and prevent
further suffering. Since October 7, we have witnessed horror unfolding on an unimaginable scale in the Occupied
Palestinian Territories and Israel. More than 2 million Palestinians in the occupied Gaza Strip are struggling to
survive amid the Israeli military’s ongoing offensive, and the level of civilian casualties has been unprecedented. I
am encouraging you to publicly call for an immediate ceasefire and appeal to the Israeli government to allow life-
saving fuel, water, and food into Gaza. The majority of Americans support a ceasefire, but President Biden has yet
to call for one. In response, towns and cities across the country are rising up to pass their own resolutions. I ask
that you, in your capacity, do what you can to help to pass one here. The need for an immediate ceasefire by all
parties is more urgent than ever to protect civilians, prevent a mounting civilian death toll in Gaza, prevent further
displacement of Palestinians, and provide an opportunity to secure the safe release of the remaining hostages.
Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Janiece Murray cc: Erin Mendenhall
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/4/2024 11:05 Deborah Stone Comments from Fairpark Resident Victoria I was at the community council meeting the other night that you attended. You might remember I was the
person who said Jon Larsen doesn’t do anything about the trucks practicing driving on neighborhood streets. That
is not why I’m writing to you by the way. I think you said something about the homeless population and the drug
problem. If I remember right, it was something like they don’t have to give up their drugs to have a place to live,
but can’t bring contraband into a housing unit. If I heard that correctly, it was the most positive thing I have heard
regarding the homeless population. As most of us know, substance dependence is a disorder that is not easily
stopped until a person is ready. Even then it is difficult. I have 34+ years of sobriety and have helped many people
attain and sustain sobriety though counseling. If the goal for the homeless population is to protect people from
the elements such as weather and from becoming a victim of a violent crime, drug or alcohol use should not be
the criteria that disqualifies them from a safe place to sleep and bathe. I have often imagined what it would be
like if the city could acquire some of the long-time vacant buildings around the city and repurpose them for the
individuals who are not ready to follow the rules and be done with drugs and alcohol but who need a safe place to
sleep. I have thought through all of the specifications and amenities including security as a ‘clean and safe’
building method that would probably cost a fraction of what has already been proposed. You told us all at the
meeting to contact you if we had any comments or ideas so that is what I am doing with this email. I work from
home doing teletherapy and have a lot of free time just getting my counseling business off the ground. If this
sounds like anything that might be interesting, you can reach me easily. Other comments I had are about the ball
field. I don’t enjoy baseball and will never attend a game. I believe construction of a ball park so close to Fairpark
residents will provide nothing short of more pollution, traffic congestion, and inconvenience for Fairpark residents
than we have already. There will be more housing problems and more people to use and drink our scarce water
that we worry so much about. And we have to pay more sales taxes for this! And, we all know that once it is done
our property taxes will increase. So, I am not for building the ball park. Respectfully, Deb Stone PhD CMHC
4/5/2024 7:47 Mary Lee Walton Budget Season Dear Chris, We need $ to save The Lake and for public schools! Thanks, Mary Walton
4/5/2024 9:29 Richard Steiner News from District Six: April Newsletter Hi Dan, I did a non scientific survey on next door asking if people were in favor of public funding for sports
stadiums. At last count there were about 20 responses all resoundingly not in favor of the teams or the public
funding (well one liked the prospect of hockey but not public funding). The city council really needs to take a
firmer stand on this issue. gifts to billionaires is not in the public interest. Rick
4/5/2024 10:00 Brian Mickey landscaping ordinances Dear Chris, Thank you for representing me on the SLC city council. I'm in favor of the recent changes to
landscaping ordinances. I'd like to see additional restrictions on leaf blowers (especially those powered by
gasoline) and similar yard-care equipment that generates noise pollution, air pollution, and carbon pollution.
Many better alternatives exist, for example: https://www.quietcleanpdx.org/solutions-alternatives-to-gas-leaf-
blowers/ https://dengarden.com/landscaping/Gas-Powered-Leaf-Blowers-Now-Illegal SLC should join other
progressive cities around the country that have already banned or restricted these dirty devices. It's time to retire
these unnecessary gadgets and improve the quality of life for SLC residents and landscaping workers. Best
regards, Brian
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/8/2024 9:23 Madison Merrill Building Accessibility Dear Council, I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to share an experience with you that left a lasting
impression on me. Recently, as I was picking up groceries at the Smiths on 8th South, I encountered a situation
that deeply saddened me. A visually impaired individual was wandering near the loading docks, clearly
disoriented and in need of assistance to locate the building entrance. Despite my efforts to guide him, I observed
his continued struggle to find his way. It struck me that accessing a building should not pose such a significant
challenge, especially for individuals with disabilities If we build our buildings with strong pedestrian access
(preferably with the buildings built to the street and the parking to the rear), it would not only be more accessible
to people with disabilities but for all pedestrians. Just something to consider if the council is ever updating the
city's development ordinances :) Creating inclusive and accessible spaces benefits the entire community and
aligns with the positive direction our city has been heading in recent years. I appreciate your dedication and hard
work for our community, and I am excited to see the continued progress of our city under great leadership. Thank
you for considering this feedback, and please keep up the excellent work. Warm regards, Madison Merrill
4/8/2024 9:49 Dan Stewart Walk in to City Council Walk in - Constituent wants to appeal the decision on the Simondi Avenue rezone Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-
00361 & PLNPCM2023-00499. He has a petition coming but would like more information on this process.
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/8/2024 11:34 Joel Wanger Reject an immediate, permanent ceasefire Dear Alejandro, I’m the Political Director of Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI), an organization of Democratic Party leaders
and activists from across the country, with over 100,000 supporters dedicated to advancing the values of the Democratic Party
— important among them our party’s long support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship. I am writing today because some have
been asking local governments to take a position in favor of an immediate, permanent ceasefire in Gaza. While ceasefires
seem attractive in the midst of a horrible war, an immediate permanent ceasefire would leave Hamas in control of Gaza, in
control of its weapons, and in control of the hostages. We hope you will join us, and the American people, in opposing such a
result. Americans oppose a ceasefire that leaves Hamas in charge of Gaza and holding hostages by 60% to just 17% who
support a ceasefire that allows Hamas to remain in power. More recently, the Harvard-Harris poll confirmed the general
finding with even more lopsided numbers showing that 67% of Americans favor a ceasefire only after the release of hostages
and Hamas being removed from power. A humanitarian pause, to facilitate the release of hostages and bring aid into Gaza,
would, of course, be welcome. The President negotiated such a pause which, as he made clear, ended because Hamas no
longer wanted to release hostages. More recently, the Biden-Harris Administration has sought a longer pause. Israel accepted
the U.S. parameters, but Hamas has rejected them. The AP reported “U.S. officials have said that they are skeptical that
Hamas actually wants a deal, because the group has balked at a number of what the U.S. and others believe are legitimate
requests, including giving the names of hostages to be released.” Moreover, Hamas could end the war immediately by
surrendering its leaders, its weapons, and the hostages. Israeli military action would stop within minutes and aid would flood
into Gaza. A resolution urging Hamas to surrender would be consonant with U.S. policy and very much appreciated. This war is
being fought for one reason and one reason only: Because on October 7th Hamas terrorists attacked Israeli communities
resulting in 1,200 deaths, 15,000 injuries and hundreds of kidnapped hostages. The savage attack included raping, burning,
mutilating, and executing women and children, Jews and Arabs alike. As you are aware, Hamas broke the last two ceasefires. A
ceasefire was in place until Hamas broke it on October 7th, in the single deadliest day for the Jewish people since the
Holocaust. Right now, Hamas continues to hold more than 130 hostages, including Americans and a one-year-old baby. We
are committed to a permanent peace and a two-state solution, but a resolution in support of a permanent and immediate
ceasefire does nothing to advance peace between Israelis and Palestinians, nor does it recognize the reality of the situation on
the ground. Hamas leadership has promised to execute attacks like October 7th over and over again. A “permanent” ceasefire
now gives them the opportunity to keep that promise, attacking again at a time of their choosing. We would be most grateful for
your opposition to any and all efforts to call for a permanent ceasefire now. If you have questions or would like to discuss any
of the issues involved, just reply to this email to let me know. If you’d like to sign up to receive future communications from
DMFI like informational talking points and memos, click here. Sincerely, Joel Wanger Political Director Democratic Majority for
Israel
4/8/2024 12:18 Adam Swillinger SLCPD Nextdoor Post Comments/D6 Adam: Eh... tell that to people that prowled my car 3 times. I don't buy it. (4/6/24) SLC PD is still down approx. 50
officers. Please work on hiring the needed law enforcenent. to really get the crime down... Just sayin... Nextdoor
Post: Due to Salt Lake City’s Police Department’s commitment to community-based policing, Salt Lake City has
achieved a 7-year low in crime. Crime is down 17% year to date. Residents can see updated statistics citywide, as
well as by neighborhood, in a newly designed dashboard at this website: tinyurl.com/SLCCrimeDashboard.
(4/5/24)
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/8/2024 12:20 Richard L SLCPD Dashboard Nextdoor Post/D6 Richard: I made a point at a CC meeting that in districts with commercoal and residential districts that it would be
useful to distinguish between the two. (4/8/24) ND Post: Due to Salt Lake City’s Police Department’s
commitment to community-based policing, Salt Lake City has achieved a 7-year low in crime. Crime is down 17%
year to date. Residents can see updated statistics citywide, as well as by neighborhood, in a newly designed
dashboard at this website: tinyurl.com/SLCCrimeDashboard. (4/5/24)
4/8/2024 12:41 Jon Bernal Speeding Cars Along Crestview Drive Hello, This morning, I watched two cars speed through the stop sign at the corner of Oakhurst and Crestview
Drive and proceeded to go well over 30-35 mph heading west on Crestview. Thankfully, my young child was at
school and not on the street at this time. Can a policeman get up here to help enforce the speeders along
Crestview Drive? What will it take to get some traffic calming measures on this street? I know you cannot be there
at all times, but I'd love for you to have a presence in the area to catch the rule breakers or at least remind people
the speed limit is 20 mph. Thank you, Jon Bernal
4/8/2024 16:28 Michelle Martinez public comment To Salt Lake City Council - I have been an early education worker in Salt Lake City for several years now and I am
writing to you because I feel let-down by our City Council and their decision not to fund Upwards. Upwards has
been an invaluable resource for connecting childcare providers like myself with families in need and showing
support for the childcare industry in our City. Park City recently invested over a million dollars in childcare
support, meanwhile Salt Lake City fails to provide similar assistance. This decision not only affects providers like
me but also puts working families in a difficult position as they struggle to find the right care for their children.
Please think this decision through more thoroughly. Thank you for your time. Michelle Martinez
4/9/2024 14:50 Karen Garff Pickleball courts for Sunnyside / D6 Hi Dan- If you have the opportunity to champion some new pickleball courts for the Sunnyside Park improvement
plan with the lease of the land to the university for their new baseball stadium it would be much appreciated.
Thank you- Karen Garff on Michigan Ave.
4/9/2024 14:51 Gary Wavra Dan Dugan / D6 Good Morning Councilman Dugan, Sir, I am concerned that as a city we are spending an inordinate amount of
money on non-revenue issues and not enough money on issues such as basic road repairs especially within our
district 6 boundaries. My latest motivation writing you about this issue is the following: I hosted individuals
representing a medium sized company based in Portland, OR seeking a presence and possibly relocating their
HQ here to the University area of SLC. They are a SAAS organization thus would negligibly affect our air quality
with production and add additional tax base for property, income, and sales tax. However, they were very
concerned about how the city streets in this area are in such disrepair and the extraordinary amount of money
focused on the growing unhoused population situation plaguing our community. It really is time that the City
Council take the lead away from the mayor and prioritize making SLC attractive to business and finding solutions
to dissuading the unhoused from gathering in the SLC area. Aggressive action taken towards the unhoused when
high profile events have taken place in the past seem to have positive though short-term results as there is little
follow-through after the events have removed the spotlight off the city. The money redirected to items such as
meaningful street repair and attracting business to this city will more than pay for themselves over time. I really
do not see how coddling the unhoused has a positive effect on the city as it has become an ever-growing money
pit. I do appreciate the links in your newsletter to the street repairs going on in the city. Please take time to review
the points in this email. I welcome your response. All the best, Gary D. Wavra
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/9/2024 15:35 Nathan Strain Unsafe railroad crossing behavior videos.Good morning. Yesterday as I was walking I encountered a train blocking the 600 W railroad crossing. This train
was stopped for nearly 30 minutes. While it was stopped numerous pedestrians walked along the second track to
go around the back of the train. As I was filming a few of them a man went under the stopped train. This train's
brakes were not applied, shortly after the man went under the stopped train another train came through very fast
on the second track. I have attached a video of the people walking around back and the man going under the
train. I have also attached a video of the second train that came with very little notice. The third video I have
attached is of an incident I recorded last month at the same crossing of two bikers ignoring an active crossing and
coming dangerously close to a Frontrunner train. It is my hope that these videos can serve as a basis for needing
the Rio Grande Plan. The videos are all in this album: https://photos.app.goo.gl/5CuahJmdrtoqdyzy8 Thank you,
Nathan Strain.
4/9/2024 16:32 Nathan Hatch New Construction Problems Hi SLC council. I'm currently moving apartments and there are many new buildings to choose from. However, I've
noticed an alarming trend in building in that most of the new construction are using heavily tinted windows which
blocks a great majority of light entry into units. I currently live in a unity with tinted glass and even though it's
south facing the unit feels like it causes health problems due to the lack of sunlight exposure (I work from home
so this is more important for my wellbeing). My current unit window opens fully so I can let in natural light, but
many of the new units have very tiny windows and even north facing apartments have tinted glass making the
units extremely dark. I believe this trend is due to supposed energy efficiency standards but even north facing
apartments have the tinting, and tinting doesn't really change energy use on large buildings very dramatically but
it does compromise the health of residents by diminishing light availability. Please look into this and change
building standards accordingly. Since units are also trending smaller this makes living in SLC potentially very
limiting.
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/11/2024 16:25 Anne Curtis Roads on 1100 South I cannot believe that the city has put in literal road blocks of cement on 1100 South and have been cutting down
the speed limits all over and for what reason? 1100 south use to be 30 now 25mph just so you can put bike lanes
in when half the year they won’t be used anyway. People are high centering their cars on these cement curbs you
have stuck in the way everywhere. I know that just one of these cement curbs cost hundreds of thousands each
and there are about 20 of them. I have to commute down this road twice or more daily and what use to take 12
minutes takes 25now. We have never been warned about this huge change to our streets or speed limit on any of
the surrounding streets. People now go so slow you can’t even drive anywhere. Was this supposed to make me
want to take the bus or tracks? I can’t to my job. Instead I hate living in SLC now and people agree with me. The
roads and road planning are the absolute worst in the nation. It has to be. Anyone that hinders traffic to this extent
has to be on the same lines with someone who needs complete control (a dictator) or is imagining that there are
hundreds of bikers out there and that traffic just doesn’t exist. With all the condos going up you’d think you would
build more lanes instead of less. Face it, winter is over 6 months here and we aren’t getting out our bikes to
commute on a psycho road like 1100 south. Please just try driving to work that way a few times. I dare you. Now
that you’ve spent our taxes I never agreed to, I’d love to know the geniuses who worked this out in theory and not
reality. I really want to know who it is responsible because I do not want to vote for them in the future. And if you
could please stop the closure of more lanes and lowering of more speed limits by 5 mph it would help traffic
move instead of the traffic jams I have to encounter every time I go anywhere by Windsor Place where I live. This
will be ignored I’m sure. If you are remotely interested in what is really happening out there in SLC just ask its
residents like myself. We would love to come talk to you. I would. Disappointed, Anne Curtis 19 year resident
4/11/2024 16:38 Michael Spore Phone call to City Council Hello, I'm calling to leave a comment about the vote of the new hockey stadium that will use the taxpayer money
to do this. I think it is very unfair to the taxpayer because we have already struggling with the high tax and I think
the owner of the hockey team should pay for it because they are already a millionaire. I would like to discuss
about this with someone and would like the council member taking this as a consideration. Thank you
4/12/2024 8:42 Ethan Smith PLNAPP2024-00140 - Appeal of a Planning
Commission Decision at 675 N F Street -
4/18/2024
Chris, I wanted to reach out to you prior to the hearing on April 18, 2024. We have been continually checking the
Citizen Portal and the Salt Lake City Website to see if there have been any filings. As of today, the only filing that
appears is our appeal and its’ exhibits that were submitted in February. I’ve noted that according to the Salt Lake
City Appeal Hearing Officer’s policies and procedures that any information that is included in the staff report
should be submitted at least 14 days before the hearing to be included. As I cannot see anything on either the
Citizen Portal or the Salt Lake City Website, I am under the impression that none have been filed, but wanted to
email you to see if this was the case. Please let me know. Additionally, as the hearing is on 4/18, we should see
the Staff Report on Friday (4/12), correct? The due date given on the Citizen’s Portal is 3/15/2024 and was last
marked as “In Progress” on 2/15/2024 and I have not seen any change to this since 2/15/2024 despite the hearing
being delayed. Also, if you know who has been assigned to be the appeal hearings officer for this matter and
could let us know that would be greatly appreciated. Best, Ethan M. Smith, Esq
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/12/2024 10:33 Joan Ogden Nextdoor / D6 I have, of late, noticed a significant number of postings and responses addressing how people feel,
overwhelmingly negative, about the proposed MLB stadium and hockey stadium. I know how busy you are, and
thought to pass on the information in case you haven’t had a chance to see those. I’ve copied the above to the
members of the EBCC board, as well. Best, Joan Ogden
4/12/2024 19:10 Anthony Teramana Unauthorized Demolition Penalties I hope the proposed penalties for unauthorized demolition of buildings succeed and apply to this building. Will
increased penalties apply? I think banning redevelopment of that site, or at least redevelopment that does not
also include restoration of the structure, is an amazing consequence.
4/14/2024 17:46 Trisha B Homeless I need help I have no where to go. I have tried to go to shelters but they tell me they don't have a bed for me. But then I get in
trouble for sleeping outside whether that is on private property or public city property. Where do you expect me to sleep if there
isn't a ground I can do that on? Are the homeless no longer allowed sleep and rest unless in shelter. And then refused shelter.
Because at this point this has been my experience. I haven't spent so much money in order to travel to these places I am told to
go. Just to be turned away when it's dark and cold and then in an area I do not know and it is not safe to be. I am on disability. I
suffer from chronic pain due to multiple back issues, I also have severe depression with psychotic features, panic disorder
with agoraphobia as well as severe GAD, with c-ptsd from relationships with Domestic violence, every day has been that much
harder for me to continue on. Not able to stand being outside around people, and then expected to sleep outside with people
and other triggers like loud noises, sirens, dogs barking. And just being in the dark alone and cold with no where I can feel safe
behind a locked door. But then I am woken up by police or other people yelling at me to move that I am not allowed there. But I
have no where to go. I don't understand what is expected when there is no other option. I go days with out eating and drinking, I
can't walk very far with my pain just increasing each day I go without rest. Most of the time I can't even sit down anywhere
afraid to fall asleep whether that is day or night. I am so scared all the time. I don't know what to do. And now it's late on a
Sunday night and I don't for see anyone replying to this since no one has responded before. By phone or message. And all
"resources" Utah provides is just another line that provides another number to call. But never getting anyone on the phone. I
got walked in to the homeless shelter the other night and as soon as the police officer left after telling him I could get a bed. He
left and then I was told no bed available and it was too late to check in. I would have to check back at 7 am!! This was on
absolutely no sleep for 5 days. I could barely move. And they kept having issues in the shelter and having cops with sirens and
screaming and yelling at people from the shelter by the shelter I am not sure. All I know. Is each time I am put in a situation like
that all my body does is panic. And sometimes I blackout and I don't know what happens because time is missing which just
scares me more. And then the cycle repeats. But with everything going on there and them lying to the cop and then turning me
away after he leaves. Well that should leave anyone not just someone who has experienced trauma but anyone I think very
worried about a place like that. And to still turn me away when it's freezing outside knowing I had no where to go. Them staying
24 hours. But then they say no bed for me. Which lately is the story of my life. Any answer, is just "no, you can't, that's not
allowed, or basically....you are not wanted here" everyday I think about killing myself. And then everyday I think more and more
that maybe I am already dead and I am living in hell already. Being punished. And my Life will continue this way only getting
Worse and I can't think of what worse can be since those thoughts could burrow a hole of intrusive thoughts and just make all
this more unbearable..more unbelievable . I don't know what to do. I can't and your resources I just get someone on the phone
giving me another number to call. Or voicemails. That are never returned. Or told that for one reason or another that they can't
help me . So what is it? What do I do? Can you tell me where I sleep tonight since shelter is clearly not going to happen for
me?? Please help me anybody My name is Trisha I am a female. Please help me.
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/15/2024 8:58 Bim Oliver Opposed to sales tax increase Hello Sarah. I'm writing to strongly encourage your opposition to the proposed sales tax increase intended to
finance the new arena. • Public financing of arenas is a losing proposition—i.e. it never generates the projected
public returns. That fact is well documented. According to the Berkeley Economic Review, for example,
“subsidies [of sports facilities] have not created the local impact that they promised.” • The arena is a private
facility; it will not be open to the public. (Entry is gained only with a ticket.) So it should be privately financed. •
The suggestion that the arena will “revitalize” downtown is a fallacy. If that were the case, then the area around
the Delta Center would have been “revitalized” long ago. Arenas are dead spaces; over the long term, they
actually depress activity where they are located. During basketball/hockey season, for example, a new arena
would be active for fewer than 100 days. Even with special events, it would be active well less than half the year.
The rest of the time, it would sit vacant (as the Delta Center does now). • There are much more immediate public
priorities in Salt Lake City that might justify a sales tax increase. Roads throughout the city are in terrible
condition. We are still grappling with homelessness and affordable housing. And we should invest in other
initiatives that would truly have a revitalizing impact on downtown. • With all that said: There's no need for a new
arena. The Delta Center is fully functional, serving as the home court for the Jazz and as a venue for NHL games
(the Las Vegas Golden Knights) and special events. For these and other reasons, the proposed increase
represents public policy at its worst - misguided and misdirected without substantive public benefit - and I
strongly encourage your opposition. Thank you for your attention. Bim Oliver Salt Lake City
4/15/2024 16:29 Robbie Stutchbury Rio Grand Plan My name is Robbie and I am reaching out to you concerning The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Salt Lake City’s
Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan. I am concerned about the lack of acknowledgement of the
Rio Grande Plan in the RDA's current plans. There is a lot of public support for the Rio Grande Plan in the city, and
the city has already funded an official costs & impacts analysis. While I support the RDA moving forward with their
mixed-use, transit-oriented vision for the district, I believe that the Rio Grande Plan should be considered as a
possibility in their plans and analysis, whether it becomes a reality or not. I want to encourage the stakeholders
(city council members, Mayor, and the RDA) to include the Rio Grande Plan in all future studies and ask the RDA
to go back and include it in their plan now. Thank you Robbie Stutchbury
4/15/2024 16:51 Marry ann Ann Wright City wide transportation plan: East West
connectivity
Hello - I have reviewed the proposed transportation plan. In my view, one of the most obvious solutions to East-
West connectivity would be to place North Temple underground for several blocks and allow the LDS Church to
have more of a campus. (They can do it in Paris and Rome and other places. And, I am not LDS.) I am for less
traffic lights between the East and West sides. From the East side - think U of U, especially - accessing Rose Park,
the airport etc., or vice versa. The trek is fraught with lights and traffic. That the City ever allowed yet more lights
to go up without really solving the E-W issue was unconscionable. And now a new sports arena? Really? Thank
You, Mary Ann Wright
4/15/2024 16:52 Sandy Lara New hockey team name Congratulations on a new hockey team! The following names would fit your bill. The Buzz, the elks,
pioneers….swarm, fighting saints. (I remember the Aba stars, they were great!) thank you for your time. Andrew of
the North Pole.
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/15/2024 17:00 Joseph Bateman Re: News from SLC Council: Weigh in on the
Draft Citywide Transportation Plan
Hello SLC City Council, Regarding the Connect SLC plan, have you considered restoring the 951 bus that used to
run downtown to alta/snowbird? The bus was for as long as I lived here. In fact, I picked my apartment on
proximity to a stop location. Several years ago, UTA consolidated the routes to begin south of the city, mainly in
Sandy. I know myself and other downtown citizens would enjoy the bus returning to service. In addition, the
downtown businesses and hotels might benefit from tourists staying downtown. Thanks for your consideration,
Joe Bateman
4/16/2024 8:31 Douglas Bohner Road Maintenance Lack of road maintenance, crack seal, has ruined some of the streets to the point of full replacement required.
What are your plans for those streets? Examples 17th south, 13th south. How are full street replacements
budgeted or capitalized for vs street maintenance? Taxes are already too high in SLC.
4/16/2024 9:25 Anonymous
Constituent
Voicemail about Master Plan Parking Voicemail: Hello I am calling regarding the master plan parking division 5.3. It states residential neighborhoods
will be protected from the negative impact of overflow parking from adjacent land uses. I am concerned and
hoping you are including the U of U and the impact on the Yalecrest neighborhood during sporting events, etc.
There will be more baseball and the crowds from that and the use of our neighborhood prevents us from getting
into our driveways and just the obedience of the residential signage and also the trash, the trash is terrible. The
public urination on our curbs and all of the noise. I hope you take this into consideration and find something else
to do with them. Also the buses that park on Sunnyside throughout the summer with all of the events at the
University, park and leave their motors running and there are nasty fumes. I hope you consider this and consider
Yalecrest. We are not a bunch of stuffy people, we live here and we take pride in living here and we would like to
take pride in living in our City. Thank you.
4/16/2024 9:30 Rachel Quist Zoning text amendment related to
enforcement on work done without a
Certificate of Appropriateness
Dear SLC Council Members: I am writing to you to express support for the proposed Zoning text amendment
related to the enforcement of work done without a Certificate of Appropriateness in the H Historic Preservation
Overlay District. The proposed amendments are appropriate, especially the enforcement actions, to ensure the
lawful processes of SLC are adhered to. I especially appreciate the inclusion of self-imposed conditions are not
eligible for Economic Hardship or justification for changing the building from a contribution status to a non-
contributing status. This seems like a common sense approach to help combat some of the loss of the City's
historic resources. I submit this to you as an owner of a historic home in the Central City local/national historic
district. v/r Rachel Quist
4/16/2024 9:40 Vin Frost Tax Dollars SHAME on ALL of our legislators for voting to bring a hockey team to SLC and forcing the taxpayers to pay for
it!!!!!!!!! And we have no say. Yet again. May you all go to hell for continuously not thinking what Utah citizens
want and need. We DON'T CARE what benefits it brings to the cities. We care about spending less of OUR hard-
earned money. Supporting sports teams is NOT in any of our budgets!!! We are NOT millionaires or billionaires!!!
Thx a lot for HATING US, IDJITS!!!!¡!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/16/2024 9:59 Frederick Jenny Rio Grande District Vision and
Implementation Plan Official
Members of the City Council, Mayor Mendenhall and SLC RDA, My name is Frederick Jenny, I have spoken at RDA
and City Council meetings before advocating for the Rio Grande Plan. I am reaching out to you concerning The
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Salt Lake City’s Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan. I am
concerned about the lack of acknowledgement of the Rio Grande Plan in the RDA's current plans. There is a lot of
public support for the Rio Grande Plan in the city, and the city has already funded an official costs & impacts
analysis. While I support the RDA moving forward with their mixed-use, transit-oriented vision for the district, I
believe that the Rio Grande Plan should be considered as a possibility in their plans and analysis, whether it
becomes a reality or not. I want to encourage the stakeholders (city council members, Mayor, and the RDA) to
include the Rio Grande Plan in all future studies and ask the RDA to go back and include it in their plan now.
Thank you, Frederick M. Jenny
4/16/2024 10:01 Keri Holt Maven state Writing to express my concern over any additional high density housing in this area! No more! The area is already
overcrowded underserved and any additional high density housing even mixed use will NEGATIVELY impact our
neighborhood and public safety! The continued addition of these types of projects are taking away from our
neighborhood.
4/16/2024 10:03 Joyce Marder SLC Council: Connect SLC I am recovering from an injury sustained when I lost my balance on an uneven portion of sidewalk (that the EMT
pointed out) along 1300 East and sustained a serious head injury. I have communicated my concerns about the
danger that uneven sidewalks present to my councilperson for years. I have been told it is up to homeowners to
repair sidewalks. There is no homeowner on 1300 East. My input is this: Fix the sidewalks.
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/16/2024 11:15 Devon Darland Urgent comments: SLC Council Meeting on
4/17
Good morning, I am writing to you all because my husband and I are unable to attend the SLC Council meeting
tomorrow (4/17) at 7pm at the City Hall Building on State St but we want to ensure our voices are heard regarding
a proposal by Maven State for the property on State St between Coatsville and Downington Ave. My husband and I
live at 144 E Downington Ave with our son and this proposal will have a direct and negative impact on our daily
lives. First, I want to say that since we cannot attend the Council meeting in person, Craig S. Cook, who I believe
will be there and is a neighbor of ours, speaks for us - we share his opinions on the matter and he can delve into
much more detail regarding our shared neighborhood concerns than I can in this email. Second, I want to briefly
share some of our concerns here: My husband and I are concerned about the number of high rise, large unit rental
properties going up in the area which are crowding out the view and the parking for the neighborhood. With this
developer's proposal for changing zoning, we are deeply concerned about the increase of traffic it'll bring through
our neighborhoods and the impact on an already tight parking situation on our street (Downington Ave). We
already have a high number of through traffic on our street, with non-residents speeding down our street and
posing a safety risk, in addition to an increase of crime in the area - we don't need more! Parking is certainly an
issue on our street already - half the houses don't have driveways and rely upon street parking, which will become
non-existent if you approve of this developer's proposal. I'm sure everyone can relate to the annoyance of not
being able to find street parking near your residence, but I wanted to add two personal stories which may deepen
your understanding of our high concern. I have fibromyalgia and depending on the day, can barely walk let alone
carry groceries or other items from my vehicle into my own house - being able to find parking in front of my house
is a necessity for my daily existence. Both my husband and adult son who each have cars are autistic - daily
routines are essential for their functioning and if you know anyone on the autism spectrum, you may be able to
empathize with how important it is for those routines to be maintained as much as possible or all hell breaks
loose. My husband and son both try to park in the exact same spots on our street every day, it's already stressful
not having control of where folks park on the street and whenever there are extra cars on the street who have
taken their spots, it throws off their entire day. Autistic meltdowns are much more likely on days when they can't
park in their routine spots. I don't want to even try to imagine what life will be like when parking becomes near
impossible on a daily basis due to the increased apartment residents in the area and lack of parking that would
result from this developer's proposal. Again, I want to reiterate in email since we cannot attend in person: We are
deeply concerned about Maven State's proposal for the property on State St between Downington and Coatsville
and Craig S. Cook speaks for us at the meeting! Take care, Devon & Steph Darland
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description
4/16/2024 11:19 Giridhar Thiagarajan SLC Council: Connect SLC Hello, Unfortunately, I wont be able to attend the meeting tonight but I thought I should send you some of my
thoughts in this context: i) I feel like the streets would become more friendly and walker friendly if there was more
shade. We live in a desert and to expect people to shun their cars and walk or bike the city should provide more
shaded walkways in public spaces. ii) Trees can provide the above mentioned shade and also reduce air, noise
and light pollution from our streets. iii) An innovative proposal could be that homes and businesses that maintain
a trees in their park strip could be given an incentive or a discount in their property taxes or something like that. iv)
Transition to electric buses should be taken up at a faster pace v) All government vehicles can move to EVs vi)
Encourage more shared vehicles to go EV. For instance, uber drivers and delivery trucks can get some incentive to
move to EVs. vii) All electric chargers should get energy from renewable sources such as solar. viii) One big
problem is that more neighborhood schools are shutting down and parents have to drive kids to schools that are
far off without school bus services. Get the school district to bus more kids in electric buses or vans. Thanks, Giri
4/16/2024 14:04 Rhianna Riggs Comments re: Enforcement on Unlawful
Construction and Demolition Activities
Salt Lake City Council Members, Thank you for taking swift action against property owners who illegally demolish
historic properties without a permit. I would like to express my support for the text amendments that are being
proposed and ask that the council consider the addition of two others: 1. The creation of an ordinance stating
demolition crews must contact and verify with the City that the appropriate permits are in place prior to starting
demolition. If this is not followed, administer appropriate fines as necessary. 2. Extend the protection of the
rebuilt buildings from 25 years to indefinitely protected as all historic landmarks are currently protected. I am
disappointed that these proposed changes will not apply to the offending property owner of the Fifth Ward
building but do hope that justice will be served for their negligence and lack of respect for our historic resources.
Thank you, Rhianna Riggs
4/16/2024 14:06 Jennifer HE Oppose A Rezoning Request Under Case #
PLNPCM2022-00998 and PLNPCM2022-
00998
To whom it may concern: My name is Jennifer He, the owner of AAT Series LLC, who owns the property located at
141 East Coatsville, Salt Lake City, UT 84105. I strongly oppose the rezoning request under case # PLNPCM2022-
00998 and PLNPCM2022-00998. The city should maintain the present CC zone and deny the zone change
request. Sincerely, Jennifer He
4/16/2024 20:56 Alessandro Rigolon Transportation master plan I generally support the broad goals of the transportation master plan but it needs some edits. 1. Feature the Rio
Grande Plan and commit to implementing it 2. Create actual goals. Reduction of VMT by how much? How many
more miles of bike lanes 3. Re-prioritize neighborhood byways 4. Commit to vision zero by a given date, with
concrete action between now and that date 5. Describe how the city will approach working to UDOT to make
UDOT roads safer. Those are the deadliest roads in SLC 6. Include climate adaptation strategies for people
walking, biking, taking transit, and everyone else not driving. It's darn hot out there in the summer. Active
transportation routes need to have bigger trees