04/16/2024 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
REVISED AGENDA
WORK SESSION
April 16, 2024 Tuesday 4:00 PM
Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in
person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas.
Council Work Room
451 South State Street, Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
4:00 PM Work Session
Or immediately following the 1:00 PM
Redevelopment Agency Meeting
7:00 pm Formal Meeting
Room 315
(See separate agenda)
Welcome and public meeting rules
In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance, the meeting may be held electronically. After 5:00 p.m., please enter the
City & County Building through the main east entrance.
The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters. The public is welcome to listen. Items
scheduled on the Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and / or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting
based on circumstance or availability of speakers.
The Website addresses listed on the agenda may not be available after the Council votes on the item. Not all agenda items will
have a webpage for additional information read associated agenda paperwork.
Generated: 09:36:17
Note: Dates not identified in the project timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. Item start
times and durations are approximate and are subject to change.
Work Session Items
1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 4:00 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects
in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and
resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts,
and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
2.Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations ~ 4:15 p.m.
10 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about ordinances that would enact temporary zoning
regulations affecting the facilities located at each Homeless Resource Center: Volunteers
of America Youth Resource Center, MicroShelter Community Program, Geraldine E. King
Women’s Resource Center, Gail Miller Resource Center, and St. Vincent de Paul Center.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
3.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 West 1300
South ~ 4:25 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of City-
owned property at approximately 1050 West 1300 South from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family
Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi-Family Residential District). The
proposed amendment would support appropriately scaled housing choices as
recommended by the Westside Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the
property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within
Council District 2.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024
4.Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC ~ 4:40 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about the 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan titled
Connect SLC. It will replace the existing Transportation Master Plan that was adopted in
1996. The Plan identifies five high-level goals, eight long-term policies called “key moves”
and over 60 implementation actions to guide transportation decisions citywide over the
coming decades.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/TransportationSLC.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
5.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Proposed Budget: Department of Public
Utilities ~ 5:00 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will be briefed about the Mayor’s recommended budget for the Department
of Public Utilities for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4,
2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD
6.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2023-
24 ~ 5:30 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about Budget Amendment No.5 for the Fiscal Year
2023-24 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect
adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and
modifications. The proposed amendment includes an infrastructure loan pilot program
to upgrade utilities while 2100 South is being reconstructed between 700 East and 1300
East, a State appropriation for Avenues City Cemetery road reconstruction and irrigation
system upgrades, and additional funding for one-time police officer new hire bonuses,
among other items.
For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD
7.Informational: Capital City Revitalization Zone ~ 6:00 p.m.
30 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about Senate Bill 272, including next steps toward
creating a Capital City Revitalization Zone, which could potentially facilitate
redevelopment around the Delta Center.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
8.Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board – Isaac Atencio ~ 6:30 p.m.
5 min
The Council will interview Isaac Atencio prior to considering appointment to the
Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 25, 2028.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 16, 2024
Standing Items
9.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -
-
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
10.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -
-
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and
announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.
11.Tentative Closed Session -
-
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health
of an individual;
b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i) public discussion of the transaction would:
(A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
(ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and
(iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements
of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 1:00 p.m. on Monday, April 15, 2024, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder,
does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice
Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The
Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who
have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
Administrative
Updates
April 16, 2024
www.slc.gov/feedback/
Regularly updated with highlighted
ways to engage with the City.
Community Engagement Highlights
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.com
Planning slc.gov/planning
Thriving in PlacePlanning
•Transmitted or in Transmittal process
•Historic overlay enforcement
•Gas stations near water bodies
•Demolition in Historic Districts regulations if done w/o permits
•Allowing Projecting Signs in all commercial and mixed -use districts
•Prohibiting demolition of housing for parking
•Modifications to Planning and Historic Landmark
Commissions'Numbers
•Mobile business Text Amendment
•Planning Commission in May
•2100 South Station Area Plan and Zoning Amendments including
Ballpark Station Area Plan amendments
•Online engagement has ended adoption process expected to start in
May
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.comThriving in PlaceMayor's Office
www.slc.gov/stewardship/
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.comThriving in PlaceEvents
Events are collected from ACE funded events, City sponsored events, and publicly permitted events. This is
not meant to be an all -inclusive list of all events going on in the City.
Event Name Start Date Location Hosting Organization ACE
Funded?
Earth Day Weekend at Esther’s Garden at
Congregation Kol Ami
4/20/24 Esther's Garden at Congregation
Kol Ami
Congregation Kol Ami Yes
Spring Into Wellness Health Fair 2024 4/20/24 University of Utah Population
Health Clinic Rose Park and Utah
Refugee Services
Rose Park Providers Coalition, University of Utah
Population Health Centers Rose Park, Utah Refugee
Services, Best of Africa and more
No
Westside Coalition Annual Meeting / Community
Celebration
4/23/24 Utah State Fair Grounds,
Promontory Building
Westside Coalition Yes
ADU Homes Tour: Big Impact, Small Package 4/27/24 Woodbine (ADU addresses
provided at registration)
SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors Yes
Elevate Theater Company “Finding Nemo, Jr. the
Musical” Evening Show
04/27/24 Rose Wagner Performing Arts
Center
Tanner Dance Program Yes
Nihon Matsuri (Japan Festival)04/27/24 Japantown Street Wasatch Front North JACL/ Nihon Matsuri Yes
Storytelling Through Song 04/27/24 Sorenson Unity Center Bomba Marile Yes
Ballpark Bites 05/01/24 Jefferson Park Salt Lake City Events No
IFSC World Cup Salt Lake City 2024 05/03/24 USA Climbing Training
Center/Momentum Indoor
Climbing Millcreek
USA Climbing, International Federation of Sport
Climbing
Yes
Homeless Resource Center Utilization:
•97% Full- Base Shelter Capacity + Winter beds
Encampment Impact Mitigation/ Rapid
Intervention:
•EIM- Rio Tinto Property @ 7200 W
•RIT - Westside- South end of Jordan River Trail
Resource Fair:
•Friday, April 12 9:30 -12:30 @ Pioneer Park
HRC Neighborhood BBQ Socials:
•Wed April 10 @ Geraldine King HRC
•Wed April 17th @ Gail Miller HRC 5:30 -7pm
Kayak Court:
•Friday April 19th @ Constitution Park
Homelessness
Update
Shelters: 801-990-9999
Additional System Information:
Salt Lake Valley Coalition to
End Homelessness (SLVCEH)
endutahhomelessness.org/
salt-lake-valley
Utah Office of Homeless
Services (OHS)
jobs.utah.gov/homelessness/
index.html
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations
Authorizing Temporary Increase in Overnight Capacity
at the Youth Homeless Resource Center at 888 S 400 W)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2014, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Volunteers of America to operate a thirty-bed homeless youth shelter at
888 S 400 W (the “Shelter”); and
WHEREAS, in 2022 there was a 30% rise in homelessness among families with children
and in June 2023 alone there were 297 unaccompanied homeless youth; and
WHEREAS, with these increases in homelessness among youth there has not been a
commensurate increase in the shelter space available for homeless youth; and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of youth
experiencing homelessness and the efforts to address the needs of those youth experiencing
homelessness has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising
social crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless youth resource centers are opened (or
permanent housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily increasing the
overnight capacity at the Shelter; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that youth experiencing homelessness
have access to shelter; and
2
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the Shelter has submitted and is in the process of pursuing an amendment to
its conditional use permit to increase the number of beds it can provide, but the application is
currently being processed by the relevant city departments and will require additional analysis
before it can be considered by city land use authorities; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days, no
more than twenty additional overnight sleeping accommodations for youth less than twenty three
years old at the Shelter on an emergency basis to provide shelter to youth experiencing
homelessness (a “temporary overflow homeless shelter use”), subject to the provisions herein;
and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered youth pending consideration of an amendment to the Shelter’s conditional use permit
constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use
regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
3
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit youth
shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing safe housing for the
City’s unsheltered youth pending consideration of the conditional use permit amendment to
permit the increased number of beds constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest
sufficient to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 888 S 400 W, which is already operating as a youth homeless shelter.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity from thirty beds to fifty
beds for homeless youth less than twenty three years old at the location identified in Section 2
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the Shelter is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The Shelter shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
4
b. Volunteers of America, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed fifty
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
issued prior to any increase in overnight occupancy of the Shelter pursuant to
this Ordinance.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the Shelter on
August 27, 2014 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This temporary zoning ordinance shall remain in effect until 180
days after its effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
5
___________________________
Katherine Pasker, Senior City At
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
VOA TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: April 12, 2024
By:
torney
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An ordinance enacting temporary land use regulations authorizing
a temporary shelter community use at approximately 255 South 600 West Street)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration of or recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to enact an
ordinance establishing a temporary land use regulations for any part of a municipality if the
legislative body makes a finding of a compelling, countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City and the State of Utah are committed to ensuring that persons
experiencing homelessness have access to shelter and have been pursuing innovative ways to
provide temporary housing options to unsheltered individuals; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah acquired portable living structures to provide secure and
more weather-resistant individual living space to persons experiencing homelessness as part of a
temporary shelter community pilot project; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency (“SLCRDA”) has committed
property it owns at approximately 255 South 600 West Street to host a temporary shelter
community during the initial phase of the temporary shelter community pilot project; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah intends to establish the temporary shelter community on a
different property on a longer-term basis, but needs a short period of time in which to continue
operations while the new location is prepared; and
WHEREAS, the SLCRDA property at approximately 255 South 600 West Street is zoned
G-MU Gateway Mixed Use District, which does not allow a shelter community use; and
WHEREAS, the temporary shelter community use is only intended to be located on the
SLCRDA property for approximately 60 days, and making an amendment to the city’s land use
2
regulations and/or zoning map for the proposed short-term use is inconsistent with established
long-term planning mechanisms that ordinarily would apply to the SLCRDA property; and
WHEREAS, leaving the portable living structures vacant during this short relocation
period is contrary to the State of Utah’s investment in the structures and the stability of the
housing they offer; and
WHEREAS, temporary land use regulations allowing a temporary shelter community at
approximately 255 South 600 West Street on a short-term basis are necessary to implement the
initial phase of the pilot project and allow the State of Utah sufficient time to prepare the long-
term site; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow a temporary shelter community
use at approximately 255 South 600 West Street for a period not to extend past July 31, 2024
subject to the provisions herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the City Council finds that accommodating a temporary shelter
community (as defined below) at approximately 255 South 600 West Street for up to two months
in order for the State of Utah to relocate the temporary shelter community to a more appropriate
location, without jeopardizing the housing of individuals that would otherwise be unsheltered,
constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interests that justifies these temporary land use
regulations. The City Council also finds that pursuing innovative solutions to mitigate impacts of
homelessness and addressing the issue of individuals camping in public spaces by authorizing a
temporary shelter community use at the SLCRDA property at approximately 255 South 600
West Street further justifies these temporary land use regulations.
3
SECTION 2. Location. These temporary land use regulations shall apply only to
SLCRDA-owned property located at approximately 255 South 600 West Street.
SECTION 3. Definitions.
“Portable living structure” is an enclosed structure with a footprint no greater than 200
square feet intended to provide temporary living quarters and space to store personal belongings
for persons experiencing homelessness and for service provider’s staff. A portable living
structure must be constructed with solid walls and a roof that meet applicable snow and wind
load ratings, have a lockable door, be collapsible or easily disassembled, and may be no taller
than 10 feet. An example of a portable living structure is provided in Exhibit A attached hereto.
A portable living structure does not include a tent manufactured for recreational camping, a
makeshift tent, a trailer, a manufactured home (as defined in Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake
City Code), a recreational vehicle, accessory dwelling unit, tiny home, or any other item or
structure not similar to the example in Exhibit A.
“Temporary shelter community” is a land use that is a grouping of temporary, portable
living structures intended to provide shelter for persons experiencing homelessness in a
concentrated area on a lot or parcel owned or leased by a governmental entity with the
permission of that governmental entity. A temporary shelter community is not a recreational
camping use and shall not occur within a public right-of-way.
SECTION 4. Uses Authorized. A temporary shelter community use at the
location identified in Section 2 above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in
Section 5.
4
SECTION 5. Conditions. The temporary shelter community use at the location specified
in Section 2 is authorized subject to the following:
a. The portable living structures to be occupied shall meet all building and fire
code requirements for such use unless other reasonable means or methods are
approved, in writing, by the Fire Marshal and/or the Chief Building Official.
A decision on whether a plan for alternative means and methods under this
section provides sufficient assurance for life safety protection shall be made in
the sole discretion of the Building Official and/or Fire Marshall and shall not
be appealable.
b. A homeless services provider selected to manage the temporary shelter
community must provide on-site supervisory staff to coordinate the needs of
the persons occupying the portable living structures. The services provider
shall staff the temporary shelter community 24 hours per day, seven days per
week while these temporary land use regulations are in effect.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 50
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
issued prior to any overnight occupancy of the building.
d. The services provider shall comply with the previously submitted security and
operations plan that met the requirements set forth in Subsection
21A.36.350.A.2 of the Salt Lake City Code. In addition to the requirements in
that subsection, the security and operations plan addresses the impacts of the
5
proposed temporary shelter community and identifies actions to mitigate those
impacts including, but not limited to:
i. Employing security personnel 24 hours per day, seven days per week
to regularly patrol the premises of that property;
ii. Communicating with the Salt Lake City Police Department frequently
including coordinating with the SLCPD’s use of CompStat
information to ensure public nuisance issues are mitigated.
e. The services provider shall maintain the existing fencing. Installed fencing
may be up to 6 feet tall in all areas of the property during the period that this
temporary land use is in effect, including required yards, but any fencing that
exceeds allowable fence heights or otherwise do not comply with the
requirements set forth in Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.40.120 shall be
removed by July 31, 2024.
f. The services provider shall require all patrons of the temporary shelter
community to check in and check out and maintain an accurate log of those
staying at the facility
g. Each portable living structure shall accommodate only one person plus any
pets.
h. A maximum of 27 portable living structures may be located on the property
described in Section 2 above.
SECTION 6. Duration. This temporary zoning ordinance shall remain in effect until July
31, 2024 unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
6
___________________________
atherine D. Pasker, Senior City A
SECTION 7. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on June 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
TSC TLUR 4.12.2024v1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 12, 2024
By: _
K
ttorney
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing a
Temporary Increase in Overnight Capacity at the Geraldine E. King
Women’s Resource Center located at 131 East 700 South)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2018, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Shelter the Homeless to operate a 200-bed homeless resource center at
131 East 700 South (the “HRC”); and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the challenge addressing the needs of those
individuals has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising social
crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless resource centers are opened (or permanent
housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily increasing the overnight
capacity at the HRC; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that individuals experiencing
homelessness have access to shelter; and
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah is in the process of siting a permanent homeless resource
campus but additional time is needed in order to locate and prepare the location, and during such
2
period it is in the best interests of the city to allow additional capacity at existing homeless
resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days, no
more than 50 additional overnight sleeping accommodations at the HRC on an emergency basis,
subject to the provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered pending the creation of a larger state run facility constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit new
and expand existing shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that temporarily increasing the
overnight capacity of existing shelter resources, pending the creation of a larger state-run facility,
3
to help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness have access to shelter constitutes a
compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 131 East 700 South, which is already operating as a homeless resource
center.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity to 250 beds
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the HRC is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The HRC shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
b. Shelter the Homeless, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 250
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
4
__________________________
Katherine Pasker, Senior City At
issued prior to any increase in overnight occupancy of the HRC pursuant to
this Ordinance.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the HRC on or
about April 11, 2018 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall remain in effect until 180 days after its
effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
KING TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 12, 2024
By: _
torney
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing a Temporary Increase in
Overnight Capacity at the Gail Miller Resource Center located at 242 West Paramount Avenue)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on April 11, 2018, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to Shelter the Homeless to operate a 200-bed homeless resource center at
242 West Paramount Avenue (the “HRC”); and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the challenge addressing the needs of those
individuals has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising social
crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless resource centers are opened (or permanent
housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily increasing the overnight
capacity at the HRC; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that individuals experiencing
homelessness have access to shelter; and
WHEREAS, increasing the overnight capacity at an existing shelter, as opposed to siting
an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the community as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the State of Utah is in the process of siting a permanent homeless resource
campus but additional time is needed in order to locate and prepare the location, and during such
2
period it is in the best interests of the city to allow additional capacity at existing homeless
resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days, no
more than 50 additional overnight sleeping accommodations at the HRC on an emergency basis,
subject to the provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered pending the creation of a larger state run facility constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit new
and expand existing shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that temporarily increasing the
overnight capacity of existing shelter resources, pending the creation of a larger state-run facility,
3
to help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness have access to shelter constitutes a
compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient to justify this temporary land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 242 West Paramount Avenue, which is already operating as a homeless
resource center.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. Increasing the overnight capacity to 250 beds
above is hereby authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. The temporary increase in the number of beds at the HRC is
authorized subject to the following:
a. The HRC shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
b. Shelter the Homeless, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client ratio in
compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security guards
may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
c. The overnight occupancy, including supervisory staff, shall not exceed the
occupancy limits identified in a temporary certificate of occupancy issued by
the City, but in no case shall the number of overnight occupants exceed 250
individuals, excluding staff. Such temporary certificate of occupancy must be
4
___________________________
Katherine Pasker, Senior City At
issued prior to any increase in overnight occupancy of the HRC pursuant to
this Ordinance.
d. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the HRC on or
about April 11, 2018 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall remain in effect until 180 days after its
effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
MILLER TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: April 12, 2024
By:
torney
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(An Ordinance Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations Authorizing a Temporary
Overnight Shelter at the St. Vincent de Paul Center located at 437 West 200 South)
WHEREAS, Section 10-9a-504 of the Utah Code permits a municipality, without prior
consideration and recommendation from the municipality’s planning commission, to
enact a temporary land use regulation for any part or all of a municipality if the governing body
makes a finding of a compelling countervailing public interest; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2014, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission granted a
conditional use permit to The Road Home to operate an approximately 65-bed winter homeless
resource center at 437 West 200 South (the “HRC”); and
WHEREAS, despite the efforts at various levels of government, the number of
individuals experiencing homelessness and the challenge addressing the needs of those
individuals has been compounded by the economic, humanitarian, and other various rising social
crises; and
WHEREAS, that until additional homeless resource centers are opened (or permanent
housing is made available) there should be flexibility in temporarily extending the period in
which the HRC can provide overnight shelter services; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to ensuring that individuals experiencing
homelessness have access to shelter; and
WHEREAS, extending the period during which an existing shelter can provide overnight
accommodations, as opposed to siting an additional shelter, imposes a lesser impact on the
community as a whole; and
2
WHEREAS, the State of Utah is in the process of siting a permanent homeless resource
campus but additional time is needed in order to locate and prepare the location, and during such
period it is in the best interests of the city to allow additional capacity at existing homeless
resource centers; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to allow for a period of 180 days,
continued overnight sleeping accommodations at the HRC on an emergency basis, subject to the
provisions herein; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that providing housing for the City’s
unsheltered pending the creation of a larger state run facility constitutes a compelling,
countervailing public interest which justifies a temporary land use regulation; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council intends for this temporary ordinance to be
effective only until 180 days after the effective date of this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages the State, County, public interest
groups, other cities, and community organizations to continue to work together with the City
to proactively address the causes and effects of the myriad of social, economic, humanitarian,
and public health crises that continue to increase the number of individuals experiencing
homelessness and compound the efforts to address the needs of those experiencing
homelessness; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council encourages other cities in Utah to permit new
and expand existing shelter locations in their communities.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Finding of Compelling Countervailing Public Interest. Pursuant to Section
10-9a-504 of the Utah Code, the Salt Lake City Council finds that temporarily extending the
3
period in which the HRC can provide overnight shelter services, pending the creation of a larger
state-run facility, to help ensure that individuals experiencing homelessness have access to
shelter constitutes a compelling, countervailing public interest sufficient to justify this temporary
land use regulation.
SECTION 2. Location. This temporary land use regulation shall apply to the
property located at 437 West 200 South, which is already operating as a winter homeless
resource center for the period between October 1 and April 15 each year.
SECTION 3. Uses Authorized. The HRC continuing to provide overnight homeless
shelter accommodations beyond April 15th, and at the current level of occupancy, is hereby
authorized subject to the conditions listed in Section 4.
SECTION 4. Conditions. Allowing the HRC to continue providing overnight shelter
beyond April 15th, at the existing level of occupancy, is authorized subject to the following:
a. The HRC shall meet all building and fire code requirements for such use
unless other reasonable means or methods are approved, in writing, by the
Fire Marshal and/or the Building Official. A decision on whether a plan for
alternative means and methods under this section provides sufficient
assurance for life safety protection shall be made in the sole discretion of the
Building Official and/or Fire Marshal and shall not be appealable.
b. Catholic Community Services, as the operator, will maintain a staff to client
ratio in compliance with minimums set forth in state licensing code. Security
guards may not be counted as part of this staffing ratio.
4
__________________________
atherine Pasker, Senior City Att
c. All other conditions not expressly superseded by this temporary land use
regulation set forth in the conditional use permit issued to the HRC on or
about August 13, 2014 remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 5. Duration. This Ordinance shall remain in effect until 180 days after its
effective date unless earlier amended, modified, or repealed.
SECTION 6. Effective Date. After publication, this Ordinance shall take effect on May 1,
2024.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
SVDP TLUR 4.12.2024
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:April 12, 2024
By: _
K
orney
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE: 1050 West 1300 South Zoning Map Amendment
PLNPCM2023-00609
The Council will be briefed about a proposal from the Administration to amend the zoning map for an
approximately 1.4-acre vacant City owned parcel at 1050 West 1300 South in City Council District Two
from its current R-1/5,000 (Single-family Residential) zoning designation to RMF-30 (Low-density Multi-
family Residential). The Administration has not prepared a development plan yet, but affordable housing
would likely be developed on the site if the proposed zoning map amendment is approved by the Council.
Council Members will recall recently approving a similar request for property at 756 South Montgomery
Street. The current request is the second in a series of similar requests for City owned parcels that will be
part of proposed West Side Infill Housing. Once the rezone process is complete for the properties, it is
anticipated that a request for proposals will be issued to construct infill housing on the sites.
The current R-1/5,000 zoning is limited to single-family homes and uses intended to serve them such as
schools, churches, and parks. Area zoning is dominated by single-family residential as shown in the map
below. The proposed RMF-30 zoning would allow small scale, low-density residential housing units. It
allows different housing types including single- and two-family, townhomes, multi-family, row houses, and
cottage developments. The zoning district can provide moderate density increases while minimizing
negative impacts to single-family neighborhoods.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning map amendment during its February 14, 2024
meeting and held a public hearing at which three people spoke in opposition to the proposal. Concerns
cited include impacts to neighborhood quality of life, the riparian corridor overlay, drainage issues,
driveways, and required parking would all reduce the number of units that could be built on the site. Other
comments included a desire for the property to be converted into a park as was the plan under a previously
Item Schedule:
Briefing: April 16, 2024
Set Date: April 16, 2024
Public Hearing: May 7, 2024
Potential Action: May 21, 2024
Page | 2
approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application (discussed below). Planning staff
recommended and the Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the
City Council. The Commissioner who voted against the proposal did not state a reason for his vote.
Area zoning map with the subject property outlined in blue.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. Since the property is owned by the City, the Council may wish to discuss with the Administration
what City goals for housing they have for potential development on the subject property such as if it
will be used to advance affordability goals.
2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if they intend the proposed housing units to be for
sale under the community land trust.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development (now Housing Stability) purchased the property
in 2010 with the intention of developing it for housing. In 2021 approximately $150,736 was awarded
through a constituent initiated CIP application to plan and design a park on the subject property. The CIP
process missed that the proposed park did not conform to the current zoning for residential housing. The
CIP process has been updated since then to include a zoning compliance check to avoid similar situations
in the future. Following the application’s approval, the Administration analyzed the property’s suitability
for a park, and housing was determined to be a better fit. The constituent was notified of the decision.
Council staff will track the previously awarded funds for the Council to consider recapturing them for a new
project in a future CIP cycle. It is the Administration’s intention to develop housing on the property.
Because the property’s proximity to the Jordan River, a portion of it is within the riparian corridor overlay
(RCO) which protects the river from impacts caused by development (see image below). If the property is
developed, an RCO permit must be obtained. Areas within RCOs cannot be developed, which limits the
potential number of dwelling units that can be constructed on the property.
Page | 3
Image showing riparian corridor overlay and its impact on the subject parcel highlighted.
Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division
The property is close to California Avenue and 900 West which are arterial streets with access to transit
and bike lanes. However, the section of 1300 South where this property is located is narrow and lacks curbs
and gutters. The road would need to be widened and improved to accommodate additional traffic
generated by development on the site. Additionally, utilities and drainage systems will need to be upgraded
to support proposed development.
The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted
nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can
outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the
zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 5-9 of
the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the
staff report.
Consideration 1 – Implementation of the Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt
Lake
Planning staff found the proposal generally aligns with goals and initiatives of the 2014 Westside Master
Plan, Plan Salt Lake (2015), and Housing Salt Lake (2023-2027) by adding incremental density to the area
on underutilized property with a variety of housing types.
Page | 4
Consideration 2 – Neighborhood Compatibility & Impact
Planning staff received comments from nearby residents who expressed concerns with the proposal. These
include impacts from increased density, and a desire to keep the property undeveloped. Planning staff
noted that the property “has not been set aside for recreational or preservation purposes and could be
developed under the current R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential zoning standards.”
Design standards in the RMF-30 zone will allow development of new housing that is compatible with the
existing neighborhood. In addition, this zone calls for durable materials, minimum requirements for glass,
a maximum length of external blank walls and other requirements to provide an aesthetically pleasing
development. The existing R-1/5,000 zoning does not have these requirements. In addition, development
standards are similar for both the R-1/5,000 and RMF-30 zoning districts as shown in the table below.
Required parking (shown in the table below) is to be provided on-site. This will help reduce on-street
parking on 1300 South.
Consideration 3 – Development Potential
The RCO will reduce the parcel’s developable area to approximately 1.25 acres. Based on this, Planning
staff calculated the following potential numbers of housing units under current and proposed zoning. It
should be noted that roads and driveways on the site, parking, setbacks and landscape buffers, and
maximum lot coverage may reduce these numbers.
R-1/5,000 Single-family residential (current)
10 new single-family homes with minimum lot sizes of 5,000 square feet.
RMF-30 (Low density multi-family residential (proposed)
Up to 36 new cottage development units with minimum 1,500 square foot lot sizes.
Up to 27 units of any other permitted housing type with minimum 2,000 square foot lot sizes.
In addition, RMF-30 zoning allows a mix of housing types, so there is potential for some combination of
single-family, duplex, row houses, cottages, and multi-family units if the zoning map amendment is
approved and the property is developed.
ZONING COMPARISON
The following table compares building height, setback, and other requirements for the current R-1/5,000
and proposed RMF-30 zoning districts.
R-1/5,000 (Current)RMF-30 (Proposed)
Maximum Building Height 28 feet for pitched roof,
20 feet for flat roof.
30 feet.
Front Yard 20 feet or average of the block
face.
20 feet or average of the block
face.
Side Yard 4 feet on one side and 10 feet on
the other.
Single family detached and two-
family: 4 feet on one side and 10
feet on the other.
Multi-family (maximum of 8
attached units): 10 feet.
Page | 5
Row Houses (maximum of 6
attached units): 6 feet on one side
and 10 feet on the other.
Cottage Development: 4 feet.
Rear Yard Minimum 25% of the lot depth or
20 feet, whichever is less.
Minimum of 20% lot depth, need
not exceed 25 feet (10 feet
required for cottage
developments).
Parking Requirements Two spaces per dwelling unit.Two-family: Two spaces per
dwelling unit.
Multi-family:
Studio and one bedroom:
One space per dwelling
unit.
Two or more bedrooms:
1.25 spaces per dwelling
unit.
Row House and
Sideways Row House:
Two spaces per dwelling unit.
Cottage Developments:
One space per dwelling unit.
Lot Area/Width 5,000 square feet, with minimum
lot width of 50 feet.
Single family detached, two-
family, multi-family, row houses:
2,000 square feet. Minimum lot
width requirements are not
applicable.
Cottage developments:
1,500 square feet. Minimum lot
widths are not applicable.
Analysis of Standards
Attachment E (pages 19-21) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards
that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized
below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of
the city as stated through its various adopted
planning documents.
Complies
Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
Page | 6
The extent to which a proposed map amendment will
affect adjacent properties.
Complies
Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent
with the purposes and provisions of any applicable
overlay zoning districts which may impose additional
standards.
Complies
The adequacy of public facilities and services
intended to serve the subject property, including, but
not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational
facilities, police and fire protection, schools,
stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and
wastewater and refuse collection.
Development will
require utility and
drainage systems
upgrades.
City Department Review
During City review of the petition, Public Utilities noted some offsite utilities will need to be upgraded as
discussed above. Also, Transportation stated improvements to the section of 1300 South where this
property is located will need improvements previously mentioned. No other responding departments or
divisions expressed concerns with the proposal, but stated additional review and permits would be
required if the property is developed. Additional information can be found in Attachment G (pages 24-26)
of the Planning Commission staff report.
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• July 27, 2023-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division.
• August 17, 2023-Petition assigned to Rylee Hall, Principal Planner.
• August 29, 2023-Notice sent to the Glendale Community Council informing them of the petition.
45-day recognized organization comment period begins.
• September 27, 2023-Early notification notice mailed to property owners and residents within 300
feet of the subject properties.
• October 3, 2023-Online open house begins and runs through February 14, 2024
• October 13, 2023-45-day comment period for recognized organizations ends. No formal comments
were submitted by the recognized organizations.
• October 18, 2023-Planning staff presents proposal at the Glendale Community Council at the
Chair’s request.
• February 2, 2024-
o Public hearing notice posted on property.
o Planning Commission public hearing notices posted on City and State websites and sent
via the Planning Division listserv.
o Notices mailed to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject properties.
• February 14, 2024- Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to
forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment.
• XXX XX, 2024-Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office.
Page | 7
• XXX XX, 2024-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office.
• March 26, 2024-Transmittal received in City Council Office.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Salt Lake City Council –April 16th, 2024
PLNPCM2023-00609
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT//
1050 W 1300 S
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
REQUEST
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
o City-owned property
o R-1/5,000 to RMF-30
PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommended approval of the
zoning map amendment
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICTS
R-1/5,000
•Single-family residential
•5,000 SF minimum lot size
RMF-30
•Increased density
•Housing type options
•Design Standards
•Low-density residential
•Building height
•Lot coverage
•Setbacks
•Parking
IN COMMON
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
PROPERTY & NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Rylee Hall // Principal Planner
Rylee.hall@slcgov.com
801-535-6308
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Received: 3/26/2024
Date sent to Council: 3/26/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 3/25/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
_
SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2023-00609 - Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S
STAFF CONTACT: Rylee Hall, Principal Planner
801-535-6308 or rylee.hall@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve the petition for a zoning map amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the
zoning map designation of City-owned property at 1050 W 1300 S in July 2023. The request is
to rezone the entirety of the subject property from the R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential
zoning district to the RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential zoning district. The
proposal is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the
Westside Master Plan. On February 14th, 2024, the Planning Commission heard the petition and
forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the zoning map. If adopted,
the new zone would facilitate construction of more residential units than would be allowed in the
current zone as well as more options for housing types - including duplexes, townhomes, multi-
family and cottage-style development.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
rachel otto (Mar 26, 2024 14:31 MDT)
In 2010, the Division of Housing and Neighborhood Development (now Housing Stability)
purchased the property with funds intended for housing development and the land was
bookmarked for future housing development. Definitive plans for development are awaiting the
outcome of the rezone process.
The subject property is a large, vacant parcel with frontage on 1300 South. Properties directly
adjacent to the site area are zoned R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential and the subject site’s
block is also entirely within the R-1/5,000 Zone and contains only single-family homes. The
Jordan River and Jordan River Trail are located across the street from the property. Due to its
proximity to the Jordan River, a portion of this property is within the RCO (Riparian Corridor
Overlay) to protect this waterway from potential negative impacts caused by future development.
Any development of the property, under the current or proposed zone, will be required to obtain
a RCO (Riparian Corridor Overlay) permit, and the requirements for this permit will restrict
development potential in regards to building placement and overall density. The requirements for
obtaining a permit include a ‘no disturbance area,’ measured from the AHWL (Annual High
Water Line) which lands roughly along the front boundary of the property. For undeveloped land
that is greater than 1 acre, the ‘no disturbance area’ extends 100 ft. from the AHWL. This
translates as an approximate 100 ft. setback from the front property line and the land within this
setback may not be disturbed. Only a portion of the ‘no disturbance area’ can be used to calculate
the development potential (density) of future development.
The RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential zoning district is intended to create
transitional residential development between neighborhoods primarily composed of detached
single-family homes, like areas zoned R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential, and denser multi-
family and mixed-use development. The residential development allowed in this zone is small
scale and low-density in nature. It is intended to maintain the existing character of established
residential neighborhoods while allowing new small-scale multi-family development on
underutilized lots to expand options for housing. The development regulations for the RMF-30
are similar to the existing zone with slightly higher allowable building height and lot coverage
allowance. The RMF-30 Zone would also introduce design standards that are not required in the
R-1/5,000 Zone, such as requirements for building materials, ground floor glass, and blank walls
that face a street.
Key Zoning Standards Comparison (Minimum Requirements)
Zone
Lot
Area
per
unit
Lot
Width
Max.
Height
Front
Yard
Side
Yard
Rear Yard
Lot
Coverage
R-1/5,000
5,000
SF
50 ft.
28 ft. or
20 ft.
flat roof
Min. 25% of the
lot depth or 20 ft.,
whichever is less
40%
4 ft. on one
side & 10 ft.
on the other
Single
Family
(detached)
Two-
family
RMF-30
Multi-
family
(max. 8
attached
units)
2,000
SF
N/A
30 ft.
20 ft. or
the average
of the
block face
10 ft.
Min. of 20% lot
depth, need not
exceed 25 ft..
50%
Row
6 ft. on one
side and 10
ft. on the
other
Houses
(Max. 6
attached
units)
Cottage
Developm
ent
1,500
SF
4 ft.
10 ft.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Early Notification - Information concerning this petition was sent to the Glendale
Neighborhood Council on August 29th, 2023. The community council did not provide formal
comments on this proposal. In addition to this, notice of the proposal was mailed to all
property owners and residents within 300 ft. of the property on September 27th, 2023. An
online open house has been posted on the Planning Division’s website since October 3rd,
2023.
• Planning Commission Meeting - The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on
February 14th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. During
the review process, Staff received some public comments from neighbors who have concerns
about the proposal. These comments can be viewed in the Planning Commission Staff Report
(link under Planning Commission Records). The general concerns were about impacts to their
properties caused by an increase in residential density and a desire to maintain the existing
undeveloped lot as is. Although the lot is vacant, it has not been set aside for recreational or
preservation purposes and could be developed under its current zoning designation. Since the
property was purchased by the City in 2010, there has been some discussion about developing
the site as a park. In 2021, the city received and awarded funding for a CIP (Capital
Improvement Program) grant for the ‘Three Creeks West Park Planning and Design’ through
a constituent application. Following the approval of the CIP application, the city analyzed the
property’s suitability for a park and ultimately, the property was deemed ineligible, and the
constituent was notified of this decision. Two public comments were received prior to the
Planning Commission meeting and after the publication of the staff report. These can be
viewed in Exhibit 6 – Additional Public Comment (received after staff report publication).
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14th, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
d) Planning Commission Meeting Recording
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of the City Council Public Hearing
4. Original Petition
5. Mailing List
6. Additional Public Comment (received after staff report publication)
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. ORDINANCE
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
5. MAILING LIST
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
(RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION)
1. ORDINANCE
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
(Amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel of property located at 1050 West 1300 South to
change the zoning from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density
Multi-Family Residential District)
An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1050 West 1300
South, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, (the “Property”) to change the zoning from R-
1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential
District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00609.
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning
Commission”) held a public hearing considering a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall
to rezone the Property from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low
Density Multi-Family Residential District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00609; and
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said
petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1: Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by
the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and
hereby is amended to reflect that the Property shall be and hereby is rezoned from R-1/5,000
Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District.
e:___________________________
____________________________
Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Att
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of ,
2024.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on .
Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published: .
Rezoning 1050 W 1300 S from R-1 to RMF30_v1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Dat March 24, 2024
By:
orney
Exhibit A
Legal Description of the Property
Tax Parcel No. 15-11-381-053-0000
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND SITUATE IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SALT LAKE BASE AND
MERIDIAN, SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH. COMPRISING 1.26
ACRES OF LOT “G” GLENDALE PARK PLAT “A” DESCRIBED AS PARCELS 1 AND 2
IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 17, 2003 AS ENTRY
NO. 8896641, IN BOOK 8912, AT PAGE 4525 OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER,
0.03 ACRES OF THAT PARTICULAR REMAINDER PARCEL OF LOT “G”, GLENDALE
PARK PLAT “A” DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED
NOVEMBER 22, 2002 AS ENTRY NO. 8430946, IN BOOK 8689, AT PAGE 0350 OF SAID
COUNTY RECORDER AND 0.12 ACRES OF THE REMAINDER PARCEL OF SAID LOT
“G” HISTORICALLY USED AS ACCESS FOR THE PARCELS WITHIN SAID LOT “G”.
BASIS OF BEARING FOR SUBJECT PARCEL BEING SOUTH 89º49’52” EAST 2869.92
FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 11.
SUBJECT PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SALT LAKE COUNTY WELL MONUMENT
MONUMENTALIZING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11;
THENCE SOUTH 89º49’52” EAST 2135.87 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER SECTION AND NORTH 00º10’08” EAST 354.67 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 3 ROD WIDE STREET AND
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 01º01’42” EAST 246.07 FEET ALONG A CHAIN LINK FENCE TO A
FENCE CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 86º25’53” WEST 40.17 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE TO A POINT ON
THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF CALIFORNIA PLACE PLAT C; THENCE NORTH
27º34’43” EAST (NORTH 27º20’00” EAST PER SAID PLAT) 66.44 FEET COINCIDENT
WITH SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY TO A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED
PLS 356548;
THENCE NORTH 61º46’57” EAST 5.58 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION IN A
FENCE LINE AND A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548;
THENCE NORTH 89º10’21” EAST 20.18 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO A
NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548;
THENCE SOUTH 89º58’20” EAST 166.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
6, CALIFORNIA PLACE SUBDIVISION PLAT “D” AND A NUMBER 5 REBAR AND CAP
STAMPED PLS 356548;
THENCE SOUTH 89º08’04” EAST 109.51 FEET COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID SUBDIVISION, (SOUTH 89º24’28” EAST PER SAID PLAT), TO A NUMBER 5
REBAR AND CAP STAMPED PLS 356548 SAID REBAR LYING 1.08 FEET EAST OF A
FENCE CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 00º14’43” WEST 50.95 FEET TO A POINT 0.40 FEET
SOUTHEASTERLY OF A FENCE CORNER;
THENCE NORTH 89º45’17” WEST 85.00 FEET TO A FENCE CORNER;
THENCE SOUTH 00º14’43” WEST 168.77 FEET ALONG A FENCE LINE TO A POINT ON
THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID 3 ROD WIDE STREET;
THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES COINCIDENT WITH SAID RIGHT OF
WAY SOUTH 75º 58’22” WEST 25.28 FEET;
SOUTH 67º09’43” WEST 201.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
2. PROJECT
CHRONOLOGY
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2023-00609
July 27, 2023 Petition for the zoning map and amendment received by the Salt Lake City
Planning Division.
August 17, 2023 Petition assigned to Rylee Hall, Principal Planner.
August 29, 2023 Information about the proposal was sent to the Chair of the Glendale
Neighborhood Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day
Recognized Organization input and comment period.
September 27, 2023 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and
property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information
about the proposal and how to give public input on the project.
October 3, 2023 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. The
Online Open House was posted to the online open house webpage on October 3rd,
2023 through February 14th, 2024.
October 13, 2023 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. No
formal comments were submitted to staff by the recognized organizations to date
related to this proposal.
October 18, 2023 The proposal was presented by Staff at the a Glendale Neighborhood Council
meeting at the Chair’s request.
February 2nd, 2024 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning
Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Public notice posted
on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning
Commission meeting on February 14, 2024. Public hearing notice mailed.
February 14, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 14, 2024. By a
majority vote of 6-1, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00609 – Zoning Map
Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S – Mayor Mendenhall has initiated a petition to amend the zoning
map for city-owned property at the above-listed address. The proposal would rezone the property
from R-1/5000 (Single-Family Residential) to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential)
District. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to support appropriately scaled
housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. The project is within Council
District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council
concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting
the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
PLACE: Electronic and in-person options.
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person
opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including
WebEx connection information, please visit https://www.slc.gov/council/agendas/. Comments
may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an
email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared
with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Rylee
Hall at 801-535-6308 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via
e-mail at rylee.hall@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://aca-
prod.accela.com/SLCREF/Default.aspx, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition
number PLNPCM2023-00609.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711.
4. ORIGINAL PETITION
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING DIVISION
DEPARTMENT ofCOMMUNTIY and NEIGHBORHOODS
To:
From:
CC:
Date:
Re:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Nick Norris, Planning Director
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and
Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director
July 20, 2023
Petition Initiation to rezone city-owned land located at 756 South Montgomery Street, 929 South
Navajo Street, and 1050 West 1300 South
This memo is to formally request that a petition be initiated to rezone city-owned land located at the
referenced addresses. This proposal would rezone each parcel to RMF-30 to support appropriately
scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Plan. Other zoning districts that are similar
in scale may be considered based on community feedback. Please see the attached map for reference.
This initiation would also authorize a lot line adjustment for the parcel located at 929 South Navajo
Street in order to maintain the 9-Line trail. The Department of Community and Neighborhoods would coordinate with Parks and Public Lands and Engineering on the lot line adjustment.
This memo includes a signature block to formally initiate the associated petitions. Please notify the
Planning Division when the memo is signed.
Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you.
Concurrence to initiate the text amendment petitions as noted above.
Erin Mend7ritiatt(Jul 25, 2023 09:41 MDT) 07/25/2023
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406
PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480
WWW.SLC.GOV
TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174
Vicinity Maps of Subject Properties
756 South Montgomery Street
• Page 2
929 South Navajo Street
1050 West 1300 South
• Page 3
Created: 2023-07-20
Nick Norris(nick.norris@slcgov.com)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAzUCdiPJg3AA-x-Nu4NWZt94vuRcB_RYH
Rezone City Owned land in westside plan
Final Audit Report 2023-07-25
"Rezone City Owned land in westside plan" History
'El Document created by Nick Norris (nick.norris@slcgov.com)
2023-07-20 - 11:03:08 PM GMT
e. Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature
2023-07-20 - 11:03:55 PM GMT
ti Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
2023-07-21 - 4:50:46 AM GMT
0o Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2023-07-25 - 3:41:42 PM GMT - Time Source: server
9 Agreement completed.
2023-07-25 - 3:41:42 PM GMT
5. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP
ADAN GAMBOA MORGA 1226 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
AGUSTIN LOPEZ 1188 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ALFREDO ARELLANO; XOCHITI VILLALOBOS; JUAN
J GOMEZ VILLALOBOS (JT 1194 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ANDRZEJ FORYS; KRYSTYNA FORYS (TC) 1191 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ANNA L MARTINEZ; MARIA A MARTINEZ (JT) 1190 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ARIC CAMPBELL; VIRGINIA CAMPBELL (JT) 1014 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
AURORA GONZALEZ 1202 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
BERNARDO E HERNANDEZ 1042 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
CHRISTOPHER E SHELTON; COTY A SHELTON (JT) 1080 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
CVN&TNIT 1117 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
EFRAIN VAZQUEZ SANCHEZ 1191 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
EPIFANIO SARINANA; MARTHA E SARINANA (JT) 1204 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
GILES C LARSEN 1030 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
GTTC PROPERTIES LC 17 N EAGLEWOOD DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054
HANS G EHRBAR 08/23/2006 3375 W MOUNT ELLEN WY TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129
HUBERT CARDENAS 1203 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
HUGO SILVA; ANA L SILVA (JT) 1118 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JAMES B SWAYDAN & LORIE R SWAYDAN
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 05/10/20 2959 PALMETTO CIR ST GEORGE UT 84790
JAMIE M FENN; JEREMY R FENN 1084 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JANET KNUDSEN 1018 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JEREMY P. KING 1205 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JERRY D VANDEMERWE 1088 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOEL W CANNON; SHAWN CANNON (JT) 1183 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE A MORENO-ARRIAGA (JT) 1187 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE CHAVEZ; REBECA CHAVEZ (JT) 1066 E 600 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102
JOSE LUIS ESTRADA; SANDRA ALFARO RIOS (JT) 1197 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE OJEDA; BLANCA OJEDA (JT) 1198 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
JOSE R HERNANDEZ; ROSALBA R HERNANDEZ (JT) 1213 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
KAP HLUN; BLAK ZING (JT) 1211 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
KEITH E TILLMAN; CARLA J TILLMAN (JT) 1212 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
KEVIN HOBBS; TANNISHA HOBBS (JT) 1106 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
LORETTA J QUINTANA 1058 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
LULU S JIMENEZ 2929 S LAZY J CIR WEST VALLEY UT 84120
LUONG H LE; BINH THANH NGUYEN (JT) 1120 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MANUEL SANTIAGO 1115 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MARGARET H MADSEN; SCOTT K MADSEN (JT) 1199 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MARIA SALAZAR 1188 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
MICHAEL C CLAPIER 6610 CHARLES ST RACINE WI 53402
MINH QUANG NGUYEN; SANG THI KIM LAI (JT) 7088 W ECHOMOUNT RD WEST VALLEY UT 84118
OWEN QUINONEZ 1201 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PATRICIA QUIROZ; VICTOR RAUL QUIROZ (JT) 1200 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PEDRO GUTIERREZ; NICOLASA GUTIERREZ (JT) 1194 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PHAP VO; BICH LE T VO (JT) 1197 S GLENDALE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PHUONG VAN NGUYEN; TRUOC THI VO (JT) 1093 W MODESTO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
PROVO-JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY AUTHORITY PO BOX 146001 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
RALPH PLESCIA; VONNA R PLESCIA (TC) 1048 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
RAUL & MARIE SEOANE FAMILY TRUST
03/13/2018 7455 S 4950 W WEST JORDAN UT 84081
REYNALDO B ROSALES 1182 S MODESTO CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ROBERTO C PONCE; CARMEN A PONCE (JT) 1196 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ROLANDO GARCIA; EDGAR GARCIA (JT) 1198 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
ROSA GARCIA-PLANCARTE 1179 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
SCOTT GOSLIN; VICKI GOSLIN (JT) 1207 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
SIRIAN ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ ROMERO;
SERGIO GARCIA VARILLAS (JT) 1197 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TALITA LATU; PASILI LATU (JT) 1020 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TANIELA VAKE 1100 W CALIFORNIA AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
THANH DAC NGUYEN; TU THI HUYNH (TC) 1123 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
THANH H SR NGUYEN; HUE T VO (JT) 1057 W MODESTO AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TIN CEU AUNG 1113 W ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1193 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1010 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 4657 E 20TH ST JOPLIN MO 64801
URIEL M RODRIGUEZ; MARIA D RODRIGUEZ (JT) 1187 S SANTA YNEZ CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
VIET TRUONG MAI; CHAN P PYO; NEE LA; THEH P
PYO 1217 S ONTARIO DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
WAYNE XIA; AMY XINGYUAN LI (JT) 6535 S CANYON CREST DR HOLLADAY UT 84121
ZARA AND TAJ INVESTMENTS, LLC 1121 W 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104
Occupant PARCEL_ADDR CITY STATE ZIPCODE
Current Occupant 1127 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1123 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1109 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1103 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1091 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1120 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1110 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1108 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1060 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1050 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1042 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1032 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1040 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1086 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1082 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1114 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1189 S ONTARIO DR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1026 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1063 W MODESTO AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1203 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1189 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1195 S MODESTO CIR Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1064 W 1300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1026 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1020 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1016 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
Current Occupant 1024 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104
6. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT
(RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION)
> -----Original Messap;e--- -
> From: scott goslin,
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 6:31PM
> To: Hall, Rylee <rvlee-hall@slcgov.com>
> Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Request for plans, information about PLNPCM > 2023-00609
>
> Hello Rylee, thanks )'OU for your response.
> So I the neighbor have anything to sayingvoteabout this change? Or proposed change? > I think what may be built wouldaffect the overall decision > It originally stated a changein zoning, height ofstructureat center point and distances to other property.
> You informed me that a? 20%
> Size or distance would apply ( something like that clause).
> I see it affectingly changing the traffics, infrastructure, property price( in re.sale), etc.. > I will be attendingand hoping they move the project to mayor Mendalls neighborhood!! Her policies do not help our area.
> I also see a raising the base lot height to accommodate the drainage or septic systems. It a problem nei,."t to the rh<er, we havean additional pumping station L lhis neighborhood to deal
With just that. > Pleaselet me knowany details for this projectsince in directlyin my BACKYARD!
> Sincerely scott goslin
Hello Rylee , I have some additional comment’s to say about this project.
Even though this project does directly affect me in the backyard of my community, I have new
thoughts about it and the current housing situation in Salt Lake City.
I have seen new information on this topic through a local And nationwide view. Due to some
PBS reporting. ( Harvard study).
I was wrong in feeling about a loss of community value. This is a small view and not a
community building issue. The extra traffic congestion, noise, sight lines, loss of green space
etc.
However I do feel that property values will slide down, but taxes go higher. With the city finding
long term excuse to manage this property to keep its values.
Once a property is Rezoned it cannot be undone. Thus forcing the neighborhood to deal with is
short sighted vote.
I see that rents and housing pricing is outrageous in all
Community’s and in ours.
I understand that city wants to help alleviate this issue in any way they can for it residents.
However I do Not see this being realized. Lots of new housing and no cost breaks given to those
tenants.
But I do see several other issues that have fueled my opinion about this in a negative way.
1) A lot of housing but really not helping anyone but companies.
The city removed a housing structure for homelessness, only to build a new overpriced building.
I’m speaking of the downtown shelter. I’m sure the city has made money and “Rezoned” this
land to accommodate these projects.
Maybe the city sets up a long term deal with these resources. to help Provide housing at
reduced rate for tax relief or something to relief these tenants.
The current property’s of 1000w between Glendale ,
Modesto do not have septic connections to city. No sidewalks or lights.
The property in discussion will have to be raised in base elevation to help with drainage. We
have a pumping station to help with this matter already.
A rise in base elevation will affect the overall height of these structures. These properties and the
one for mentioned will also have a loss of 20 plus feet in lot size , to accommodate the street and
infrastructure codes.
Also this street that will be clogged due to heavier traffic.
I see the need for a rezoning but nobody can show me a Proposed site plan. Just any long term
thought to what this might be.
With any details of the change of height restrictions ,( 2 feet increased height. This does not do
anything except hide the views).
The proposed setback will put neighboring house looking into my home. And restricting river
and Mountain Views.
These are some of the details that seems to be lacking in this debate.
So I cannot believe anything good long term will Come out of this rezoning with out full ideas,
some thought into what we need and want this land to be. Also some full disclosure of what the
city wants and needs are.
In writing this I have contacted my local councilman Alejandro Puy, still awaiting a response.
2) I see rezoning all over the city but not helping anyone but white men, ( and I’m white).
The Conditional Use Permits have been done away with in salt lake county, city. Making it
very hard to find a space to start and grow a business . ( explaining later)
3) I see a huge taxes increase for anything in SLC, and not getting anything out of it. Except
Constant Construction, removal
Of parking downtown. And more F$@king scooters on the sidewalks. And as a Pedestrian
getting almost hit daily walking on sidewalks but Nobody using those bike lanes! The city has
received monies from these companies and they park their product on city land. But this doesn’t
improve anyone’s health. Just more fat dangerously unaware people! So much for bikes.
I’m not a big fan of this bike program so far.
I moved out of south salt lake after 17 years , when the huge increase of high rise apartments(ritz
bowling ), and seemed lack of long term vision. It was I , whom lacked the vision and did not
want live in such a congested area. ( and I have met Mayor Wood and like her vision at that
time.)
This was south salt city’s lack of Vision to me. And it only seems more money for the city as we
cram more into a smaller space.
They rezoned for the dodge dealerships and forced 6 blocks of traffic onto one street, Wentworth
ave. Not good for the community.
This being one of the reasons. I Moved to a lower income area. Better house 1910 to a 1998
build.
Only to Have a 100% increased taxes in less than 4 years in (Glendale).
So with the lack of clear vision, I would ask for a negative vote for this project.
So I feel that Salt Lake City may be doing the same quick fixes.
But lacking the best vision for long term growth.
I do not appreciate how mayor Medhall is more Media savey, to Have a camera running for all
Her great deeds. But not really for the greater good of our community.
So The business side,
Let me explain.
I was going to start and new year round food business to provide fresh greens growing
hydroponically, year round .
But when researching this issue. However when trying to find space to have the business,
almost impractical. The rise Land cost, city fees and lack of augiculture space. ( no rezoning or
permits, C.U.P. Changes.)
So with our Bad air and such seems uncontrolled growth, land, costs. I’ve chosen to Kill my
business and keep my head above water.
Now with high Interest rates not
Even possible now!
As for fair wages to pay for housing. I am a UNION member for 35 years. Being a union
member helps my bottom Line. Only because we Believe in wages for work.
I see a lack of good wages and people stretching to make ends meet. Paying more in a tip does
not help people long term and insults the consumer.
Pay a fair wages and this might float the boat! Amazing how nobody wants that?
Furthermore all city wants is another team. Really more growth forcing people out.
I’m sure these same issues are
Occurring in the north part of the city. Forcing others to find somewhere else to live but
nowhere to go, in SLC county, city.
So in closing I’m glad to
Hear the city wants to help. But I don’t think they have thought this out.
Vote No !
Sincerely Scott Goslin
Item B7
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan - Connect SLC
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action.
MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date.
MOTION 3 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING & ADOPT
I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt an ordinance replacing the 1996
Transportation Master Plan with Connect SLC as the Citywide Transportation Plan.
MOTION 4 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Citywide Transportation Plan: “Connect SLC”
NEW INFORMATION
The Citywide Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC sets the 20-year vision and transportation policies
umbrella that all transportation related plans, programs, and projects fit under. Note that the City is moving
away from using the phrase “master plan” when referring to Council-adopted policy documents. This Citywide
Transportation Plan would replace the 1996 Transportation Master Plan. The overall policy direction of the
plan is to focus on helping people move around the City regardless of the transportation mode they choose; it’s
neither autocentric nor anti-automobile. The draft plan reflects a desire to be proactive with changing the City’s
streetscapes to meet the needs of all users across transportation modes. The Council held a midpoint check in
briefing on the Plan back in November 2022. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to forward a
favorable recommendation to the Council in November 2023. The Council’s public hearing is scheduled for
April 16 and could vote to adopt the plan on May 7 or May 21. The Council has the authority to add, remove, or
modify parts of the plan before adoption.
See Attachment 1 with pages 45-49 of the Plan for an overview of all the policies, strategies, and actions. The
Citywide Transportation Plan is not a list of capital projects to improve transportation which will appear in the
forthcoming Capital Asset Plan (a five to 10-year Capital Improvement Program or CIP Plan). Rather, the plan
proposes eight core policies called “Key Moves” that each have multiple strategies and specific implementation
actions to advance the 20-year transportation vision for the City. For example, Key Move 6 Low-emissions
Mobility Options has four strategies numbers 6.1 – 6.4 and each of the strategies has multiple implementation
actions listed underneath. There are over 60 specific actions to implement the key moves.
Council Member Recent Areas of Interest and Feedback
Below is a list of Council Member’s areas of interest and feedback from prior briefings and recent discussions
about the draft plan and related topics. The list identifies which key moves and supporting strategies relevant
to the topic for easier reference. The list is not comprehensive, is in no particular order, and provided for
discussion purposes.
Implementing the Livable Streets traffic calming program
- Key move 2 Zero Traffic Deaths and strategies 2.1 and 2.2, key move 3 Great Networks for Active
Mobility strategy 3.1, and key move 8 Operationalize Complete Streets strategies 8.1 and 8.2
- See policy question #3 about adding a Livable Streets program implementation policy goal
- The program moves the City’s transportation safety efforts into a more proactive approach, however,
there are limits to what the City can do on roads owned and controlled by UDOT and railroad crossings
Project Timeline:
1st Briefing: November 10, 2022
2nd Briefing & Public Hearing: April 16, 2024
3rd Briefing: May 7, 2024 (if needed)
Potential Adoption Vote: May 7 or 21, 2024
Page | 2
Mitigating Westside transportation challenges caused by freight trains blocking City streets
- Key move 5 Healing the East-West Divide and strategies 5.1 – 5.4
- This is identified as the City’s single greatest transportation challenge
- The Council funded $150,000 in the FY2024 annual budget for train crossing safety signs to provide
better notice on upcoming freight trains blocking a street and the potential duration. The intersection
of 900 West and South Temple was selected as the initial site to pilot the new service. Delivery and
installation of the signs is anticipated this spring
- See section below with an update on the Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Federal
Planning Grant to study transportation solutions to the east-west divide
Demand management of greater downtown curb space and parking
- Key move 6 Low-emissions Mobility Options and strategies 6.1 – 6.4
- Council Members recently raised this topic in Budget Amendment #3 which proposes funding to
replace all the downtown parking pay stations. The existing policies, fees, and placements would
remain but be evaluated for potential changes after the public becomes accustomated to the new
stations (a change management approach)
- The Council is tentatively scheduled to vote on the funding at the April 16 formal meeting
- The new stations include features that could facilitate implementing some of the actions identified in
the plan
Improve alleyways as part of the City’s transportation network
- Key move 3 Great Networks for Active Mobility strategies 3.1 – 3.3 and key move 7 Places for People
strategy 7.2
- There are approximately 80 miles of alleyways in the City but many are not well suited for mobility
purposes because they’re disconnected from preferred travel routes and lack of regular ongoing
maintenance
Supporting housing placement and density near transportation centers and transit-oriented development
- Key move 4 Transit Friendly Neighborhoods strategies 4.1 – 4.3
- In December, the Council acting as the RDA Board recently adopted a housing and transit
reinvestment zones or HTRZs policy and is exploring multiple potential zones in the City. HTRZs are a
new state authorized tool addressing housing around public transit stations
Improve public transportation options to and sustainability in the Northwest Quadrant (NWQ)
- Key move 3 Great Networks for Active Mobility strategies 3.1 – 3.3, key move 4 Transit Friendly
Neighborhoods strategies 4.1 – 4.3 , and key move 7 Places for People strategy 7.1
- The demand for greater transportation options for workers to get to and from the NWQ has increased
as the area experiences high growth. Some employers have commented that the lack of transportation
options is a talent recruitment and retention barrier
- Council Members have highlighted the importance of water conservation and managing stormwater
runoff on City streets is particularly salient in the NWQ near the Great Salt Lake
Explore separating vehicles from non-vehicle transportation modes to improve safety
- Key move 2 Zero Traffic Deaths and strategies 2.1 and 2.2, key move 3 Great Networks for Active
Mobility strategies 3.1 – 3.3, and key move Healing the East-West Divide and strategies 5.1 – 5.4
- Council Members have mentioned under crossings (currently one under Foothill Drive is conceptually
being explored) and overpasses for pedestrians as safety tools to further separate vehicle traffic from
other modes of transportation
Advocate for fare capping so public transit users don’t overpay
- Key move 4 Transit Friendly Neighborhoods strategies 4.1 and 4.2, key move 6 Low-emissions Mobility
Options and strategies 6.1
- Fare capping has been implemented by public transit agencies in other states. After a passenger buys
short-time tickets in an amount equivalent to the cost of a monthly pass then they automatically get
transit access the rest of the month as if they had purchased a monthly pass
Page | 3
Action Plan, Metrics, and Next Steps
See Attachment 2 for the 30 proposed metrics organized by key move policy
An Action Plan is proposed that documents how progress will be tracked and communicated to the community.
This would follow adoption of the Citywide Transportation Plan and likely require funding. The Transportation
Division stated this would be an important first step after adoption. The preference is to “contract with a non-
profit organization that will provide a highly experienced a research fellow for one year to review City policies
and procedures to identify conflicts and gaps, and to make recommendations that will bring practices across
the City into alignment with one another and with Connect SLC.” The fellow could also work on systems to
track the proposed metrics. See policy question #4 about funding in the next annual budget for an Action Plan.
Council Members have mentioned multiple performance metrics that would help show success in advancing
the City’s transportation policies such as impact of transportation infrastructure changes on sales tax revenues
from surrounding businesses, reduced fatalities and crashes, shorter wait times for east-west travel, reducing
the number, location, and duration of streets blocked by trains, improved air quality, less speeding, shifting
trips away from vehicles to other transportation modes, etc. Some of these are already tracked either by the City
or other entities while some metrics would require new systems and funding to collect and analyze the data.
Below are examples of next steps for each of the eight key moves. See policy question #2 about the Council
sharing their top priorities with the Administration to implement the Citywide Transportation Plan’s policies
and inform future budget requests.
- Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Engagement – Hiring transportation staff with diverse language
skills and cultural backgrounds that better represent the community population being served.
- Key Move 2: Zero Traffic Deaths –
o Consider “near miss” identification technology software to expand our understanding of where
collisions occur.
o Creating a position dedicated to implementing this policy. Note that the Council added four
transportation planner FTEs in the FY2023 annual budget to facilitate faster implementation
of the Livable Streets traffic calming program.
- Key Move 3: Great Networks for Active Mobility – Funding CIP transportation programs such as
Livable Streets traffic calming, neighborhood byway, safer pedestrian crossings, and midblock
walkways.
- Key Move 4: Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods –
o Continue the frequent bus service routes partnership with UTA as part of Funding Our Future
o Fund mobility hubs in residential neighborhoods to improve access to transit and supporting
amenities
- Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide – Identify local matching funds for upcoming federal grant
applications to implement transportation solutions from the Reconnecting Communities federal
planning grant. See policy question #5 on this topic and the update about the study later in this report.
- Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options – Develop a parking strategy and curbspace
management strategy for the greater downtown and potentially Sugar House. Note that the Council is
scheduled to consider funding downtown parking pay station replacements in Budget Amendment #3
on April 16.
- Key Move 7: Places for People – Expand the City’s alleyways program to activate these spaces and
integrate with transportation networks.
- Key Move 8: Operationalize Complete Streets – Evaluate policies and procedures across programs and
departments to identify gaps and areas to align them with the Citywide Transportation Plan.
Page | 4
Policy Questions
1. Modify or Add Policies and Actions – Does the Council agree with the eight core policies called “Key
Moves” in the plan? Does the Council see any policies, strategies, and/or implementation actions that
should be modified or are missing? See Attachment 1 with pages 45-49 of the Plan for an overview of
all the policies, strategies, and actions.
2. Next Steps for the Eight Core Policies Called Key Moves – The Council may wish to share top priorities
with the Administration about what next steps are most important to help inform future budget,
staffing, and resource requests. for each of the Key Moves and whether progress could not happen on
some without new funding, fulltime employees, technology, or other resources.
3. Livable Streets Program Implementation Policy Goal – The Council has expressed a desire to fully
implement the City’s Livable Street traffic calming program on a faster time than the 20 years
estimated based on funding levels the past few years. The Council may wish to discuss with the
Administration whether to explicitly make this a policy goal and metric in the Citywide Transportation
Plan. The forthcoming Capital Asset Plan could estimate funding levels needed annually to achieve this
goal. Fully implementing the program across all 113 zones is estimated to cost $52 million for the
remaining 104 zones yet to be funded ($500,000 average cost per zone).
4. Funding for an Action Plan and Metrics to Measure Progress over 20-years – The Council may wish to
ask the Administration to include funding in the FY2025 annual budget for the proposed Action Plan,
review of city policies and procedures for alignment with the new Citywide Transportation Plan, and
systems to track the proposed metrics.
5. Identify Local Matching Funds for Reconnecting Communities Federal Construction Grants – The
Council may wish to ask the Administration to recommend in future budget openings local matching
funds for anticipated federal grant applications to construct east-west transportation solutions. The
Council previously discussed that the timing of the Reconnecting Communities final study may not
align with the limited funding opportunities offered under the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law.
Public Comments
A few constituents spoke at the general public comment portion of recent Council formal meetings and at the
Planning Commission’s public hearing. The comments focused on two topics: (1) improving safety for non-
vehicle travel through construction zones and (2) adding the Rio Grande Plan or elements thereof to include
the concept of undergrounding sections of railroad tracks through the greater downtown area.
Improving Safety for Non-vehicle Travel through Construction Zones
Strategy 3.2 has an implementation action to improve work zone standards that could address the issue raised
by the constituent. It calls for the City to “adopt more robust standards and guidelines, putting more resources
toward enforcement, and providing training on updated standards to help make sure people have a seamless
travel experience during construction” (page 73). The constituent suggested further actions the City could take
including additional resources for enforcement of traffic laws, especially through construction zones, which
could include the Police Motors Squad, the Police Civilian Response Team, photo radar, etc. Another
suggestion was requiring a site plan that accommodates travel spaces for all types of users when issuing a
building permit (e.g., covered pedestrian walkways when construction temporarily closes a sidewalk and/or
bike lane with particular focus on the downtown and areas with a greater number of non-vehicle travelers).
The Rio Grande Plan / Undergrounding Sections of Railroad Tracks
Key Move #5 is Healing the East – West Divide and the constituent’s comment fits within Strategy 5.2 Provide
safe and reliable connections across the freeway and railroad tracks and the implementation action to develop
bold concepts to repair and build community. The action includes five “Big Ideas” (pages 102 – 104) that reflect
elements of the community-driven Rio Grande Plan:
- Bury Interstate 15
- Trench the train
- Reconsider freeway ramps
- Break the berm
- Integrate development
Page | 5
City Awarded Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Federal Planning Grant
Since the November 2022 briefing, the City applied for and in February 2023 was awarded a Reconnecting
Communities planning grant. The grant is funding a study on transportation solutions to heal the east-west
divide. The proposed study process received approval in February by the Federal Highways Administration
office in Washington D.C. This allows the agreements to be executed and the study to begin in earnest.
Study Budget
The study has a total budget of $3.74 million. UDOT is acting as the financial administrator for the City. The
Federal Highway Administration preferred this arranged in part because UDOT already has the systems to
regularly manage federal transportation funds and meet the compliance requirements. The budget includes:
- $1.97 million from the federal reconnecting communities planning grant
- $1.24 million from the General Fund
- $500,000 from UTA
- $25,000 from the RDA
- $5,000 from Public Utilities
Timing of Study Completion may not Align with Federal Implementation Grant Application Deadlines
Council Member have expressed interest to the Administration about submitting federal applications for
implementation funding. Those applications may need to be submitted before the study is finalized, which
could be in two years. There are limited federal funding opportunities to implement the results of the study
but the largest federal grants are scheduled to only be available for two or three more years. Most of these
construction grants are authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
Congressional authorization would be needed to extend most of these construction and implementation
grants beyond the next two or three years. At a transportation conference, Council staff learned that the U.S.
Department of Transportation’s implementation grants are anticipated to prioritize applications that have
greater matching funds and include a coalition of participating agencies.
Planning Commission Recommended Two Changes to the Plan
The Planning Commission held a follow up briefing and accepted public comment at the November 8, 2023
meeting, and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. The Commission
also unanimously passed a second motion that:
“With an additional recommendation that Section 1.3 be amended to read, Strategy 1.3 facilitates long
term dialogue between the City, the local community, and other regional partners. For Strategy 2.1 to
establish a vision zero action plan, to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and
awareness about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City.”
The Transportation Division updated the language in the specific sections for strategies 1.3 (page 57) and 2.1
(page 62) to reflect the Commission’s motion. The overview of key moves, strategies, and actions on Page 46
was inadvertently not updated and will be as part of an updated transmittal for the adoption vote tentatively
scheduled for May 7.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Overview of Policies, Strategies, and Actions in Citywide Transportation Plan taken from pages 45-49
2. Citywide Transportation Plan Metrics by Key Move Policies
− Information below was provided to the Council at the November 10, 2022, midpoint check in briefing −
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Administration transmitted a status report on efforts to update the City’s Transportation Master Plan. The
Council adopted the last plan in 1996. It provides high-level transportation policy direction for the City which
influences other plans, programs, budgets, projects, studies and more. The new plan is called Connect SLC. It
covers all modes of transportation through the City instead of an auto-centric focus. This briefing is a chance
for the Council to provide policy feedback, hear community priorities received through public engagement, and
Page | 6
discuss the current recommendations and direction. Council feedback will be incorporated into development of
a draft plan which is expected to be available next year.
The City has many plans that fit under the umbrella of the Transportation Master Plan such as the 2015 Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan, the 2017 Transit Master Plan, the recently completed Sugar House Local Link
Study and many others. These more specific plans and studies include project recommendations that advance
the City’s Transportation Master Plan policies.
The Transportation Division worked with a Community Advisory Council throughout the process of developing
the values, policy goals and priorities for the upcoming plan update. This included site visits and workshops
such as experiencing the west-east divide firsthand for those unfamiliar with it. The top values based on public
feedback which are being used to guide development of the Plan are: air quality and the environment,
reliability, safety, affordability, ease of use, equity, and access to opportunities.
Goal of the briefing: Review the draft values and policy direction developed based on public engagement
and provide feedback to be incorporated into the draft Transportation Master Plan update.
POLICY QUESTIONS
The below questions are meant to highlight Council Member priorities, areas of interest and potential topics
for the briefing discussion.
1. West-East Divide – To what degree should addressing the east-west transportation problem be
prioritized in the new Plan? See Additional Info section for a federal grant the City applied for to study
potential solutions to this problem.
2. Performance Metrics – What policy goals could the Plan advance that should be evaluated? For
example, reduced fatalities and crashes, shorter wait times for east-west travel, reducing at-grade
railroad and street crossings, improved air quality, less speeding, shifting trips away from vehicles to
other transportation modes, etc.
3. Traffic Calming – How does the new Plan build upon the City’s new Livable Streets Program which
redesigns the public right of way to implement traffic calming?
4. Alleyways – How should the Plan address alleyways? The City has considered some alleyways as being
for mobility and transportation while others might be better suited for activation of other uses. See
Additional Info section for details on City funding for alleyways. The Council may wish to ask the
Administration if ongoing funding for alleyway maintenance will be recommended in future budgets.
5. Accessibility Standards – Does the City have an ordinance or policy designating ADA accessibility the
basic standard for all transportation infrastructure investments? How would this be reflected in the
new Plan?
6. Partnerships – To what extent do the City’s transportation policy goals depend upon support from
railroad companies, the Utah Transit Authority, the Utah Department of Transportation, and other
external partners?
7. Students and Schools – How does the City support students traveling to and from schools? Are there
additional policies that could help such as the State’s Safe Routes to School program or feedback from
the School District and parents that should be considered?
8. Keeping up with Technology – How should new and emerging transportation technologies be reflected
in the plan such as super-fast electric vehicle charging stations, drones, self-driving vehicles, air taxies,
delivery robots, etc.?
9. Education and Enforcement - Should public education and enforcement be part of the Plan? The
Council Office has received public comments that bus stops, bike lanes and sidewalks are sometimes
blocked by parked vehicles, vehicles idling, scooters, and obstructions to ADA ramps.
Page | 7
ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
City Applied for Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) Discretionary Federal Grant
The City was not awarded a federal RAISE grant and is awaiting response to the RCP application. The grant
would fund the analysis & prioritization of solutions to the east-west divide through transportation
infrastructure changes that encourage connectivity and community stabilization. Transportation is proposing
to study the following intersections: north-south I-15 and rail corridor and east-west crossings (600 North, 200
South, 400 South, 800 South, 900 South/9-line Trail, 1300 South, 1700 South and 2100 South.)
Grant funding: $1,970,000 from U.S. Dept. of Transportation
Match: $1,770,000 – Sources: $1,240,000 from Funding our Futures (BAM#4); UTA $500,000; RDA/Arts
Council; $25,000, Public Utilities $5,000
Alleyways Funding
In FY2021 the Council approved $200,000 in one time money for a pilot program for alleyway maintenance
and improvements. The funding was from the County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation. This funding
was used to start a pilot program where selected alleys with support of adjacent residents received pavement
rehabilitation treatments, vegetation was removed and amenities were added such as flowerbeds, art, and
lighting. As part of FY2023 CIP the Council approved $142,919 from the General Fund for alleyway
improvements which could include continuing the pilot program. Previously, the City did not have dedicated
funding for alleyway improvements. The limited available funding for public right of way projects was focused
on street reconstructions, ADA accessibility improvements and ongoing maintenance.
ACRONYMS
ADA – Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BAM – Budget Amendment
HTRZ – Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone
NWQ – Northwest Quadrant
RCP – Reconnecting Communities Pilot federal grant
RDA – Redevelopment Agency
TBD – To Be Determined
UTA – Utah Transit Authority
Key Moves are how we move to action
This section describes the eight Connect SLC Key Moves as well as their strategies, actions, and
evaluation metrics. The Key Moves are:
Authentic and
Intentional
Engagement
Healing the East-
West Divide
Low-Emissions
Mobility Options
Great Networks
Places for People
Transit Friendly
Neighborhoods
Operationalize
Complete Streets
DOWNTOWN
45
Attachment 1
Overview of Policies, Strategies, and Actions in Citywide Transportation Plan taken from pages 45-49
KEY MOVE 2
Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all.
Action: Convene a Vision Zero working group
Action: Analyze crash history and create a plan for action
2.2 Create safer streets
Action: Take advantage of federal funding opportunities
Action: Focus on high-injury corridors and intersections
Action: Reduce vehicle speeds
KEY MOVE 1
Authentic and Intentional Engagement
Build lasting relationships with community members to empower
diverse voices at the planning table.
people where they are
Action: Partner with Community-Based Organizations in equity areas and
Action: Give communities agency in planning contexts and empower
Action: Compensate community participants to value their time and
contributions
collaborative co-creation
Overview of Key Moves, strategies, and actions
Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan46
1.1 Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices
Action: Improve staff understanding of the local community by meeting
build capacity for public engagement
Action: Center community input and needs in directing future
investments for the Westside
1.2 Redefine engagement as an opportunity for co-creation
neighborhood voices in leading outreach efforts
1.3 Facilitate long-term, ongoing dialogue between the City and the
local community
Action: Establish embedded community focus groups or advisory panels
Action: Actively demonstrate the outcomes of community input
Action: Update the engagement guide with a workplan for recurring,
Zero Traffic Deaths
2.1 Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan
Action: Embrace the Safe Systems approach to traffic safety
KEY MOVE 3
Invest in our active transportation network to improve
KEY MOVE 4
Transit Friendly Neighborhoods
Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel
advancing transit
Action: Improve access-to-transit infrastructure to complete
Great Networks for Active Mobility
connections and health outcomes.
3.1 Improve pedestrian safety and connectivity
Action: Designate a Pedestrian Priority Network
Action: Adopt crossing guidelines
Action: Identify the greatest needs for improving acti ve mobility
3.2 Expand low-stress bicycling networks and micromobility options
Action: Implement low-stress facility design
Action: Adopt an equitable shared mobility policy
Action: Improve work zone standards
3.3 Create active spaces
Action: Create slow, shared, and car-free streets
Action: Activate alleys
in Salt Lake City.
4.1 Make transit convenient and reliable
Action: Institutionalize SLC and UTA partnership with a joint taskforce on
Action: Expand the city's bus lane and transit signal priority (TSP) network
4.2 Nurture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces
Action : Expand SLC's Downtown Ambassadors program to support and
staff transit facilities
Action : Work with UTA to upgrade bus stops in SLC with
passenger amenities
Action: Harness technology to modernize major transit facilities
and waiting areas
4.3 Enhance the urban context to make transit an attractive option
Action : Establish multimodal mobility hubs in local areas
of importance and future growth
the city's street network
Action: Use Small Area and Circulation plans to encourage
dense development around station areas
47
KEY MOVE 5
Healing the East-West Divide
in Westside neighborhoods.
5.1 Develop a community-driven east–west transportation strategy
addresses immediate needs and inspires bold action
5.2 Provide safe and reliable connections across the freeway
5.3 Reclaim spaces to serve community and function
5.4 Develop equitable, connected neighborhoods
KEY MOVE 6
Low-Emissions Mobility Options
Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals
6.1 Build awareness and use of transportation options
Action: Hire a transportation options program manager to enhance
Action: Expand student and education pass programs
Action: Implement a transportation wallet
Action: Incentivize developers to incorporate transportation demand
6.2 Manage existing parking supply
Action: Consolidate parking functions under a new parking program
Action: Understand parking utilization and performance
Action: Optimize a single mobile parking application
Action: Create an updated parking brand and communications plan
Action: Pilot a park-once-and-walk district in Downtown SLC
Action: Implement a project to pilot innovative and shared curb uses
Action: Develop Curb Management GuidelinesAction: Develop Curb Management Guidelines
Connect SLC Citywide Transportation Plan48
Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting
Action: Elevate voices of communities on the Westside and those most
impacted by transportation infrastructure
Action: Center human safety, health, and experience
Action: Craft a community-centric East-West Transportation Strategy that
and railroad tracks
Action: Develop fast implementation projects that stitch the east-west divide
Action: Develop bold concepts to repair and build community
Action: Improve transportation options that support safe, affordable
east-west travel
at a human scale
Action: Create a program to bring life and community identity to "below
the freeway" spaces
Action: Foster local and grassroots efforts to envision remedies and uses
for "in between" spaces
Action: Rethink freeway ramps
where prosperity is shared
Action: Develop complete, inclusive, transit-oriented neighborhoods
Action: Use grade and elevation to create great experiences
and efficiently manage our streets .
employer outreach
management (TDM) into the development process
6.3 Communicate a unified parking strategy and brand
Action: Prioritize clear and consistent wayfinding and signage
6.4 Develop a curb management strategy
Action: Conduct a survey for existing curb uses across Salt Lake City
KEY MOVE 7
Places for People
KEY MOVE 8
Operationalize Complete Streets
Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets
8.1 Develop shared goals and accountability for Complete Streets design
8.2 Develop tools to guide decision-making
assessments
8.3 Use street typologies to guide Complete Streets development
Leverage community benefits from private investment
to create welcoming community gathering places.
7.1 Leverage private investment in high growth areas
Action: Create public realm action plans
Action: lncentivize developers to implement adopted street concept plans
Action: Establish a green street network
7.2 Promote connectivity at the block level to create
walkable districts
Action: Value street and alley vacations
Action: Require mid block pathways
through effective partnership.
and management
Action: Integrate Complete Streets into the full project development lifecycle
Action: Structure project development teams to ensure accountability
Action: Establish a Complete Streets Steering Committee
Action: Update the Quality Transportation Improvement Program screening
tool to align with Connect SLC
Action: Develop data-driven storytelling tools to support Complete Streets
Action: Align capital projects with policies and best practice
Action: Formalize use of the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide
in project development
Action: Require compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies
Design Guide in the Complete Streets assessment
49
ATTACHMENT 2
Citywide Transportation Plan Metrics by Key Move Policies
Key Move 1: Authentic and Intentional Engagement
- Dollars paid to community-based organizations and community members.
- Comparison of demographic data for survey and in-person outreach events compared to city-wide
demographics.
- Geographical distribution of in-person events and survey responses.
Key Move 2: Zero Traffic Deaths
- Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-
injury locations).
- Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using
personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc.).
- Change in prevailing vehicle speeds on key corridors representing each of the City’s street
typologies.
Key Move 3: Great Networks for Active Mobility
- Change in walking and bicycling mode share.
- Number of new or enhanced pedestrian crossings.
- Change in access to all-ages-and-abilities bicycle facilities (e.g., population within ¼ mile).
Key Move 4: Transit-Friendly Neighborhoods
- Change in transit mode share.
- Number of TSP and bus lane treatments installed per year.
- Change in travel time for commuters traveling into SLC.
- Percentage of stops in SLC upgraded with amenities.
- Transit rider satisfaction survey results.
Key Move 5: Healing the East-West Divide
- Travel time reliability east to west compared to north to south.
- Number of safe, protected crossings for all modes between 2100 S and 600 N.
- Change in rate of traffic deaths and serious injuries (all modes) per capita (citywide and at high-
injury locations such as in the Westside neighborhoods).
- Change in number of traffic deaths and serious injuries for people walking, bicycling, and using
personal devices (wheelchairs, skateboards, etc).
- Percent of income spent on transportation (Housing + Transportation Index).
Key Move 6: Low Emissions Mobility Options
- Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).
- Percentage of curb space not allocated for parking.
- Percentage of parking revenue invested in mobility options.
- Parking performance (occupancy, turnover, violations).
- Awareness of transportation options programs via biennial citywide transportation surveys.
Key Move 7: Places for People
- Number of uninterrupted blocks (without midblock crossings) in the city.
- Creation of and progress on Green Streets.
Key Move 8: Operationalize Complete Streets
- Track compliance with the Street and Intersection Typologies Design Guide, particularly the
number of deviations granted.
- Track Complete Streets elements added to projects as a result of the interdepartmental process.
- Provide a public facing dashboard where finalized Complete Streets assessments can be viewed.
PROCESS RECAP
•Public Engagement Driven
•Values Based
•Not a List of Infrastructure Projects
•A 20 Year Vision for Transportation
in SLC
WHAT’S IN IT
•Vision
•Getting Around SLC
•Community Engagement
•Values
•Key Moves
•Achieving the Vision
VISION
It is our plan, envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where
everyone enjoys equitable, affordable, and reliable transportation choices.
Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and safety, expand access to
opportunities, and improve air quality. Connect SLC identifies how we move
today, what we value, how we want to improve public spaces, and what
improvements would make it easier for us to move around Salt Lake City
(SLC). Through our transportation programs, policies, and investments, we
can directly influence the quality of life for people who live in, work in, and
visit our city.
Getting Around SLC
•What is Happening on our Roadways Today
•Safety
•Mode Split
•Trends and Challenges
Community Engagement
•Community Advisory Council
•Phase 1: Values
•Phase 2: Big Ideas
VALUES
•Equity
•Health and Safety
•Reliable Options
•Affordability
•Sustainability
KEY MOVES: Authentic and Intentional Engagement
Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices at the
planning table.
•Prioritize underserved populations and marginalized voices
•Redefine engagement and an opportunity for co-creation
•Facilitate long-term ongoing dialogue between the City and local
communities
KEY MOVES: Zero Traffic Deaths
Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all.
•Establish a Vision Zero Action Plan
•Create Safer Streets
KEY MOVES: Great Networks for Active Mobility
Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health
outcomes.
•Improve Pedestrian Safety and Connectivity
•Expand Low-Stress Bicycling Networks and Micromobility Options
•Create Active Spaces
KEY MOVES: Transit Friendly Neighborhoods
Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City.
•Make Transit Convenient and Reliable
•Nurture Inclusive and Welcoming Transit Spaces
•Enhance the Urban Context to Make Transit an Attractive Option
KEY MOVES: Healing the East-West Divide
Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside
neighborhoods.
•Develop a Community Driven East-West Transportation Strategy
•Provide Safe and Reliable Connections Across the Freeway and Tracks
•Reclaim Spaces to Serve Community and Function at a Human Scale
•Develop Equitable Connected Neighborhoods where Prosperity is Shared
KEY MOVES: Low Emissions Mobility Options
Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage our
streets.
•Build Awareness and Use of Transportation Options
•Manage Existing Parking Supply
•Communicate and Unified Parking Strategy and Plan
•Develop a Curb Management Strategy
KEY MOVES: Places for People
Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming community
gathering places.
•Leverage Private Investment in High Growth Areas
•Promote Connectivity at the Block Level to Create Walkable Districts
KEY MOVES: Operationalize Complete Streets
Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership.
•Develop Shared Goals and Accountability for Complete Streets Design and
Management
•Develop Tools to Guide Decision Making
•Use Street Typologies to Guide Complete Streets Development
THANK YOU!
joe.taylor@slcgov.com
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/tmp/
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________Date Received: _________________
, Chief Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT:Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC
STAFF CONTACT:Joe Taylor, Transportation Planner IV, Joe.taylor@slcgov.com, or
(801) 535-6679
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC
BUDGET IMPACT:None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:The Administration has developed the Citywide
Transportation Plan: Connect SLC (the Plan) to replace the existing Transportation Master Plan.
The Salt Lake City Transportation Master Plan, while a remarkable and progressive document
for its time, was adopted in 1996. Much has changed since that time, including transportation
planning practices and the zeitgeist of how we think about public rights-of-way. Mobility of
goods and services is still of necessity, but it shares space with notions of safety, accessibility,
and concerns for the environment.
The policy landscape within Salt Lake City has also changed dramatically since the mid-1990s.
Plan Salt Lake (2015) laid out the City’s vision, aiming to prepare our city for growth while
simultaneously focusing on sustainability and livability. At the root of the vision is quality of life
for current and future generations. Specifically, in the realm of transportation, Salt Lake City has
adopted a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2015) and a Transit Master Plan (2017). These
plans provide a list of projects that the City hopes to accomplish to bring transit and active
transportation into parity with our current autocentric landscape.
In this context, Connect SLC (formally the Transportation Master Plan) aims to take the values
espoused by the former plans, as well as those we heard from the community during
development of the Plan update, and to imbue all transportation projects, initiatives, and day-to-
day operations with those values. Much like Plan Salt Lake, Connect SLC is intended to function
as a Citywide plan that brings consistency not only to the Transportation Division’s work, but
also to the City as a whole, recognizing that many divisions and departments of the City touch
our transportation system in some way. According to the vision of Connect SLC “It is our plan,
envisioned by the community, to work toward a future where everyone enjoys equitable,
affordable, and reliable transportation choices. Connect SLC sets goals to improve health and
safety, expand access to opportunities, and improve air quality.”
KEY MOVES:The Plan lays out eight key moves to advance these values in our transportation
network:
1. Authentic and Intentional Engagement
Build lasting relationships with community members to empower diverse voices
at the planning table.
2. Zero Traffic Deaths
Implement a Vision Zero Strategy to improve safety for all.
3. Great Networks for Active Mobility
Invest in our active transportation network to improve connections and health
outcomes.
4. Transit Friendly Neighborhoods
Make transit a competitive and attractive mode of travel in Salt Lake City.
5. Healing the East-West Divide
Heal past harms by building trust with the community and reinvesting in Westside
neighborhoods.
6. Low Emission Mobility Options
Expand transportation options to meet our climate goals and efficiently manage
our streets.
7. Places for People
Leverage community benefits from private investment to create welcoming
community gathering places.
8. Operationalize Complete Streets
Design, build, operate, and maintain great streets through effective partnership.
PUBLIC PROCESS: Engagement began with the creation of a Community Advisory Council
(CAC). Through a formal application process, we identified nine individuals who would be
compensated hourly for their work on the project. The CAC gave ideas directly, helping shape
the broader community engagement plan. They also participated in events, edited documents
(including the final draft of the Plan), and perhaps most importantly, gave us access to their own
networks. With the help of the CAC, we launched a public engagement effort that asked the
community what they value most in their transportation system. Results from an online survey
and in-person events conducted at pop-up vaccine clinics were weighted to reflect city
demographics, in this case, adjusting for a lack of people 18 and under.
Individuals who live, work, and/or go to school in Salt Lake City identified safety from harm,
affordability, reliability, equity, and sustainability as their top transportation values. The project
team then took these values and created a large menu of policy options to address them. The
policy areas that received the most public support formed the basis of the second round of
engagement, detailed below.
A total of 879 (15 in Spanish, 864 in English) people responded to the City’s online survey and
approximately 60 people participated through in-person outreach. While demographic
information was not consistently collected for in-person participants, these events focused on
reaching communities who were under-represented in online survey responses, particularly
people who live in Salt Lake City’s Westside neighborhoods. The full report for the first round
of engagement, including geographic and demographic analysis of the respondents, is included in
Exhibit 4 of this document.
The second round of engagement took the values identified in the first round and created a menu
of policy options that could potentially advance those values. These policy options were
explained with both written explanations and visual representations. Participants could vote
online for the concepts that best addressed their desires and concerns. Participants were also able
to plot points on a map of the city and identify problems or highlight things that worked well.
This process was also conducted at several in-person events where participants could use stickers
and post-it notes to vote on the concepts. In-person engagement took place at the following
locations:
Three Creeks Park Dedication
Northwest Recreation Center (timed to coincide with a soccer tournament)
Living Traditions Festival
West High School
Gail Miller Resource Center
Spy Hop Block Party
University Neighborhood Partners/Partners in the Park
Salt Lake City Homeless Resource Fair (Madsen Park)
Since individuals could vote multiple times and demographic information was not collected, the
exact number of individuals responding to the second round of engagement was not collected.
However, we received thousands of responses during this round. We had a native Spanish
speaker present to help with engagement at some of these events, and the results were significant
enough to be highlighted in Key Move 1 of Connect SLC.
After the second round of engagement, staff took two additional internal engagement steps.
First, in order to address City representation, we presented the project to the Planning
Commission and the City Council for the first time. Recommendations from these entities
included focus on the following areas: safety, integration with land use policy, and continued
effort toward complete street programs for critical east-west corridors These comments were
integrated into the plan, specifically in Key Moves 2, 5, 7 and 8.
Second, the work was presented to a meeting of City department directors. This work session
allowed other departments and divisions to voice any concerns and create space for suggestions
on how the Plan could better integrate with other City efforts across departments.
The draft plan was presented to the Planning Commission on November 8, 2023. The
Commission unanimously recommended adoption by the City Council with the following text
amendment:
“Section 1.3 be amended to read, Strategy 1.3 facilitates long term dialogue between the City,
the local community, and other reginal partners. For Strategy 2.1 to establish a vision zero
action plan, to further engage with the community to raise pedestrian safety and awareness
about potential collision in the streets in Salt Lake City.”
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access)
b)PC Minutes of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access)
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of November 8, 2023 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan
2)1996 Transportation Master Plan (Currently Adopted)
3) Draft Citywide Transportation Plan – Connect SLC
4)Survey Report (First round of public engagement)
5)2015 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (Adopted)
6)2017 Transit Master Plan (Adopted)
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
NO. ___ OF 2024
(Ordinance adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a, the Municipal Land Use,
Development, and Management Act (the “Act”), on December 7, 2015, the Salt Lake City
Council (“City Council”) passed Ordinance No. 63 of 2015 to adopt Plan Salt Lake as a general
plan; and
WHEREAS, as part of Salt Lake City Corporation’s (“City”) general plan, on July 19,
1996, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 19 of 1996 adopting the Transportation Master
Plan of 1996 (the “1996 Transportation Masterplan”) as a guiding document for transportation
policy; and
WHEREAS, since its adoption, significant changes in the state of transportation policy
and practice, as well as concerns regarding safety, sustainability, mobility preferences, and
equity considerations have rendered the adopted 1996 Transportation Master Plan valuable but
obsolete; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on
November 8, 2023 to consider recommending adoption of Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide
Transportation Plan (the “2023 Transportation Plan”), as required by the Act; and
WHEREAS, at its November 8, 2023 meeting, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission
voted unanimously in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council to
adopt the 2023 Transportation Plan as provided in Exhibit "A” attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has
determined that the adoption of this ordinance is in the City’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
1. Adopting Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan. That Connect
SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “A” is
hereby adopted to replace the 1996 Transportation Masterplan as part of City’s
general plan, pursuant to Utah Code Chapter 10-9a.
2. Jurisdiction. That Connect SLC: The 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan shall
apply within the City’s municipal boundaries to their full extent.
3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been
published in accordance with Utah Code 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance
with Utah Code 10-3-713.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of
___________________, 2024.
.2
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________________
Victoria Petro, Chair
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
MAYOR
___________________________
CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM
(SEAL)Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: __________________________
Bill No. ________ of 2024
Published: ______________. _______________________________
Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney
March 6, 2024
___________________________
:_____________________
Montoya,Senior City Attor
March 6,2024
Page | 1
COUNCIL BUDGET
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Sam Owen, Policy Analyst
DATE:April 16, 2024
RE:FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES,
Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Street Lighting Funds
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The total proposed FY25 budget for the Department of Public Utilities is $553,114,955, which is $44.3 million
(8.7%) higher than the FY24 budget of $508,778,032.
The Department consists of four utilities, Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Street Lighting, each Enterprise
Funds, generating revenue through user fees and separately allocating staffing, materials budgets and capital
improvement programs. Each fund is responsible for extensive capital asset networks, largely regulated by state
and federal requirements. The department funds and implements infrastructure maintenance and upgrades to
comply with current federal regulation, and mandates of reliable customer service and regulation.
The chart below shows key utility service cost points for customers and residents requested in the budget
proposal for each fund. This example is focused on a medium residential user in the city. The budget book
includes more information about other classes of users for each utility listed.
Utility &
proposed
rate increase by
percent, MEDIUM
residential users
Proposed
usage rate
increase,
residential
customers
monthly
Proposed
NEW fixed
rate increase,
residential
customers
monthly
Estimated
monthly
residential
customer
change
Average
annual
residential
customer
change
FY25 NEW revenue
projection
Proposed bond and
loan revenue FY25
Water, 4%$2.73 $10.18 $12.91 $154.92 $26,609,260 $100,558,000
Sewer, 4%$2.16 $7.22 $9.38 $112.56 $11,612,632 $240,009,000
Stormwater, 10%$1.06 $0.00 $1.06 $12.72 $1,355,391 $5,028,000
Street Lighting,
10%
$0.62 $0.00 $0.62 $7.44 $459,209 $0
TOTAL
CUSTOMER
IMPACT, SELECT $23.97 $287.64
Project timeline:
Briefing: April 16, 2024
Budget Hearings: May 21 & June
6, 2024
Potential Action: tentative June 11,
2024
Page | 2
Proposed increases to the combined operating budget of all utilities for FY25 include 5% for employee benefits
and compensation, as well as increases paid to other city departments such as Information Management
Services (IMS) and risk management.
The total operational cost of $151,464,015 also includes $540,070 more in payments to the Metropolitan Water
District of Salt Lake and Sandy (MWDSLS) for water purchased, then conveyed through the Salt Lake City water
system. Separately, the Water District is seeking an additional $6,772,094 million in revenue through a property
tax increase proposal.
If the tax increase proposal does not move ahead this year, water sales costs from the Water District could
increase rates by about 39%, which would need to be recovered by the utility through a possible additional rate
increase for customers.
BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS BY UTILITY
Water Utility
Operating sales in the water utility are budgeted to increase by 28.6%. This results in part from a new proposed
fixed rate that would apply to all water service connections, in addition to a water usage rate increase. This
includes a usage rate increase of approximately 4%. The Administration indicates that it is likely that future
budget years will include further rate increase proposals.
Rate increases over past years have brought in only 41% of projected revenue, leaving the water utility with a
year-over-year budget shortfall. The new fixed fee on all water connections is an attempt to recover that
shortfall, and maintain balanced revenue and expenditures going forward. The fixed fee will not rely on usage, so
the actual revenue should more closely match the projection.
The department obtained $31,500,000 in grant funding through the federal Building Resilient Infrastructure
and Communities (BRIC) program. These funds will go toward construction on the City Creek Water Treatment
Plant. Water treatment plant upgrades and construction are a major focus of the utility’s FY25 capital program.
The department also anticipates a low-interest loan installment of $6,700,000 for Lead and Copper water line
replacement. This replacement program is part of a federal requirement. With these funds, the department has
greater flexibility to help pay for these water line replacements that could otherwise fall on the homeowner.
Bonded debt service climbs to about $20 million per year through FY28.
WATER UTILITY FY 2023-24
Figure amended for rollover
contracts, where applicable
FY 2024-25 PERCENT
CHANGE
Total balanced revenue and
expenditures
$207,569,015 $206,304,772 -0.61%
Capital improvement budget $100,511,912 $85,718,000 -14.72%
Operating expenditures $90,961,294 $100,720,648 10.73%
Debt payments $10,170,366 $12,349,624 21.43%
Operating sales $93,046,300 $119,655,560 28.60%
Sewer Utility
Operating sales in the sewer utility are budgeted to increase by 15.22%, or $11,612,632. This results in part from
a new proposed fixed rate that would apply to all sewer service connections, in addition to a sewer usage rate
increase. This includes a usage rate increase of approximately 4%. The Administration indicates that it is likely
that future budget years will include further rate increase proposals.
Page | 3
Bonded debt service escalates between $34 million and $39 million per year through FY28; WIFIA loan
repayment starts FY28, adding about $15 million to debt repayment. Capital expense for the new Water
Reclamation Facility, under construction until 2026, will be an estimated $213,125,333. Total project cost for
this generational facility is now about $910 million.
SEWER UTILITY FY 2023-24
Figure amended for rollover
contracts, where applicable
FY 2024-25 PERCENT
CHANGE
Total balanced revenue and
expenditures
$538,416,907 $311,873,824 -42.08%
Capital improvement budget $475,253,281 $242,348,333 -49.01%
Operating expenditures $31,060,940 $34,137,412 9.90%
Debt payments $29,168,726 $33,150,579 13.65%
Operating sales $76,303,000 $87,915,632 15.22%
Stormwater Utility
Operating sales are budgeted at $14,909,297, a 10% increase from the previous year. The Administration
indicates that it is likely that future budget years will include rate increase proposals of between 5% and 10%.
The additional service cost has to do with the utility’s requirements for infrastructure and water quality.
The utility will receive $2 million in American Rescue Plan (ARPA) funds for infrastructure upgrades and
replacement.
Debt service climbs briefly, falls, then approaches $1.6 million through FY28.
STORMWATER UTILITY FY 2023-24
Figure amended for rollover
contracts, where applicable
FY 2024-25 PERCENT
CHANGE
Total balanced revenue and
expenditures
$23,873,513 $28,159,596 17.95%
Capital improvement budget $8,041,105 $12,294,000 52.89%
Operating expenditures $11,669,060 $12,512,720 7.23%
Debt payments $1,735,254 $1,673,376 -3.57%
Operating sales $13,553,906 $14,909,297 10.00%
Street Lighting Utility
Operating sales are budgeted at $5,051,294, a 10% increase from the previous year. The additional service cost
has to do with the utility’s requirements for infrastructure and inflation. The Administration indicates that it is
likely that future budget years will include further rate increase proposals.
The largest component of the utility’s capital improvement program is base level projects, totaling $900,000.
Debt service remains at about the current level of about $193,000 through FY28.
Page | 4
STREET LIGHTING UTILITY FY 2023-24
Figure amended for rollover
contracts, where applicable
FY 2024-25 PERCENT
CHANGE
Total balanced revenue and
expenditures
$6,151,963 $6,776,763 10.16%
Capital improvement budget $2,256,415 $1,240,000 -45.05%
Operating expenditures $3,701,986 $4,093,235 10.57%
Debt payments $193,562 $193,528 -0.02%
Operating sales $4,592,085 $5,051,294 10.00%
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. Is the Council interested in exploring reduced or alternative rate increase scenarios?
a. The Council could adopt or amend the current proposal, and consider a proviso that the
department return as soon as practicable with cost & rate justification information from its
pending rate study. This would be used to evaluate the possibility of reducing the rate burden, or
focusing financial support in a more beneficial and comprehensive way.
b. Are there categories of customer the department anticipates would be most significantly
impacted by the current proposal, e.g. businesses or collective residential developments?
c. Has the department considered or implemented targeted engagement to ratepayers that might
fall into categories facing significant impact under the current proposal? In the past, one vehicle
for doing this has been the comprehensive rate study.
2. Are there more robust measures the City could implement with financial utility support for customers?
3. Is there complete information about the scale of changes being considered for the department’s impact
fee update? (Impact fees in this context are also known as connection fees) When might the Council like
to hear more about a potential revision or update?
4. The department provides a private street lighting grant matching program. Constituents can apply for
grant funds, match the funds, and the city will manage installation of a new streetlight that constituents
are responsible for in terms of electricity payment and maintenance.
a. Is the distribution of these private lights geographically equitable throughout the city? What
impediments and opportunities does the department see with this program, in terms of
implementing the Street Lighting Master Plan?
5. Broadly, would the Council like to hear more about implementation of the most recently adopted Street
Lighting Master Plan?
6. The Council might wish to ask the department to provide material documenting public engagement
efforts for the various major projects across all funds.
a. For example, what information does the department track and manage about participants in
engagement efforts, or otherwise aggregate data about participants? Can this information be
used to broaden and build public outreach?
b. The Watershed Master Plan update is one example of a process that has included stakeholder
engagement from communities citywide. What other programs does the department manage
and promote that solicit this kind of engagement?
Page | 5
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Proposals for future year rate increases will also come before the Council in subsequent annual budgets.
This year, the department is conducting a comprehensive rate study, which will help determine the
nature and extent of those rate increase proposals. The department conducts a rate study about every
five years, or so.
Public Utilities delivers water within and outside Salt Lake City municipal boundaries. This service
includes Millcreek, Cottonwood Heights, Holladay, Murray, Midvale and South Salt Lake. The other
utilities serve only inside the city boundaries. County water customers pay about 30% more than City
water customers based on actuarial assessment of liability and historical investment.
The department is not proposing new full-time equivalent (FTE) positions to its current total of 495. The
department does propose to create a new role of Deputy Finance Director, using an existing vacancy.
The position would address succession, workload, financial planning and the extensive process of
changing the department’s utility billing system.
The existing impact fee schedule for the department’s divisions is out of date. The department is
initiating an Impact Fee Plan update April 2024, anticipated completion calendar 2024.
This chart from the department’s budget book shows the timing of debt service on bonds and loans. Cash
generated from the debt goes to fund capital programs in the utilities.
Total debt service increases notably this fiscal year and in years subsequent. The bonded debt depicted in the
chart above funds massive infrastructure maintenance, upgrades and construction. The timing of these
infrastructure costs is determined partially by regulatory requirements from state and federal governments.
Timing is also determined by opportunities to coordinate projects with the City’s other capital programs such as
Page | 6
road reconstruction. The major driver of the utilities’ infrastructure programs is maintaining critical service
delivery citywide.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Fiscal year 2024-25 Public Utilities budget book
1
Public Utilities FY24-25 Budget
Presented by Laura Briefer and Lisa Tarufelli
DEPARTMENT-WIDE OVERVIEW
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
2
3
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Department-Wide Insights for FY 2025 – Budget Drivers
•Insight #1: Assessment and replacement of aging water, sewer,
stormwater, and street lighting infrastructure continues to be a
high priority.
•Insight #2: Federal and state regulatory obligations are the
primary drivers of SLCDPU’s operational and capital expenditures
in the Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Utilities.
•Insight #3: Inflationary pressures for all four utilities have
increased the costs to replace aging infrastructure, meet
regulatory compliance requirements, and bond for projects.
•Insight #4: Drought conditions over the last two to three years
have a significant revenue impact to the Water and Sewer Utilities,
resulting in less than 50% rate revenue recovery.
•Insight #5 and #6: SLCDPU’s initiatives are directly aligned with
Mayor and Council priorities
4
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Department-Wide Insights for FY 2025 – Budget Scoring Matrix
Insight #7: Budget matrix score for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Operational Programs is 20
Insight #8: Budget matrix score for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Capital Programs is 20
Insight #9: Budget matrix score for Street Lighting Operations and Capital Programs is 16
5
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Department-Wide Insights for FY 2025 - Personnel
•Insight #10: The FY 2025 budget includes the addition of a Deputy
Finance Administrator. This position will be created using an
existing vacancy within the Finance Division. The position is
needed to address succession and increased workload associated
with financial strategy, the multi-year process to replace SLCDPU’s
billing system, and rate studies.
•SLCDPU currently has 495 FTEs and is not proposing additional
FTEs.
6
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Department-Wide Budget Overview - Revenues
Revenue
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Operating Sales 187,495,291 187,495,291 227,531,783 40,036,492 21.35%
Interest 1,468,936 1,468,936 1,558,134 89,198 6.07%
Permits 267,500 267,500 267,500 - 0.00%
Interfund Charges 4,215,396 4,215,396 4,638,504 423,108 10.04%
Other Revenues 1,827,190 1,827,190 3,520,747 1,693,557 92.69%
Impact Fees 4,400,000 4,400,000 4,400,000 - 0.00%
Contributions 14,275,230 14,275,230 40,790,000 26,514,770 185.74%
Bond/Loan Proceeds 277,176,000 277,176,000 345,595,000 68,419,000 24.68%
From (To) Reserves 17,652,489 284,885,855 (75,186,713) (360,072,568) -126.39%
Total 508,778,032$ 776,011,398$ 553,114,955$ (222,896,443)$ -28.72%
Projected Department of Public Utilities Revenues for FY 2024-25
7
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Department-Wide Budget Overview - Expenditures
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Personal Services 54,251,832 54,252,960 58,701,685 4,448,725 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 9,761,269 10,273,610 12,008,822 1,735,212 16.89%
Charges for Services 69,447,361 72,866,710 80,753,508 7,886,798 10.82%
Debt Service 41,267,908 41,267,908 47,367,107 6,099,199 14.78%
Capital Outlay 10,849,889 11,287,497 12,683,500 1,396,003 12.37%
Capital Improvements 323,199,773 586,062,713 341,600,333 (244,462,380) -41.71%
Total 508,778,032$ 776,011,398$ 553,114,955$ (222,896,443)$ -28.72%
Proposed Department of Public Utilities Expenditures for FY 2024-25
8
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Department-Wide Budget Overview
Funds Operations Capital Debt Fund Totals
Water 100,720,648 93,234,500 12,349,624 206,304,772
Sewer 34,137,412 244,585,833 33,150,579 311,873,824
Storm 12,512,720 13,973,500 1,673,376 28,159,596
Street 4,093,235 2,490,000 193,528 6,776,763
Total 151,464,015$ 354,283,833$ 47,367,107$ 553,114,955$
Summary of Utilities Fund Budgets FY 2025
WATER UTILITY
9
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Water Utility Budget Revenue Insights
Insight #W1: Significant water conservation trends are expected to be sustained, resulting in decreased revenue
from usage-based rates.
Insight #W2: Rate stabilization is needed to offset revenue reductions to cover operations and capital.
Insight #W3: Usage rate increases have performed poorly in terms of revenue realization, due to decreased water
usage.
Insight #W4: A combination of a 4% rate increase and a rate stabilization fee based on meter size is proposed this
year to increase revenue reliability while continuing to provide a water conservation price signal.
Insight #W5: The revenue budget is proposed to decrease by $1,264,243, or .61%, from the FY2024 amended
budget.
10
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Water Utility Rate Stabilization Fee
2024 Current to Proposed
Current Rate Service Fee Rate Stabilization Fee Total Fixed Fee (Amount increased)
3/4 $13.61 $14.15 $10.18 $24.33 $10.72
1 $17.81 $18.52 $20.43 $38.95 $21.14
1 1/2 $28.28 $29.41 $84.40 $113.81 $85.53
2 $40.87 $42.50 $84.40 $126.90 $86.03
3 $74.40 $77.38 $448.08 $525.46 $451.06
4 $112.11 $116.59 $448.08 $564.67 $452.56
6 $216.95 $225.63 $448.08 $673.71 $456.76
8 $342.72 $356.43 $448.08 $804.51 $461.79
10 $887.78 $923.29 $448.08 $1,371.37 $483.59
2025 Proposed RateMeter Size (Inches)
11
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Water Utility Usage Rate Change for Residential Customers
12
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Water Utility Monthly Rate Change Impact
2024
Account Type Monthly
Usage
Meter
Size
Current
Rate
Proposed
Rate
Stabilization
Fee Total $
Change
Residential
Minimum Use 6 ccf 3/4 $25.73 $26.75 $10.18 $36.93 $11.21
Residential Low
Use 8 ccf 3/4 $29.76 $30.95 $10.18 $41.13 $11.37
Residential
Medium Use 21 ccf 3/4 $68.22 $70.95 $10.18 $81.13 $12.91
Residential High
Use 61 ccf 1 $228.92 $238.08 $20.43 $258.51 $29.59
Industrial Use 8,040 ccf 2 $19,064.08 $19,826.64 $84.40 $19,911.04 $846.96
Commercial Use 966 ccf 2 $2,237.61 $2,327.11 $84.40 $2,411.51 $173.90
2025
13
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Water Utility Budget Expenditure Insights
Insight #W6: An increase in personal services of $2,718,363 is proposed. This increase
accounts for a 5% cost of living adjustment and employee compensation changes.
Insight #W7: A 3% increase in wholesale water costs through MWDSLS is proposed. This
assumes that MWDSLS can restore its certified tax rate to the historic .00035 level. If the tax
rate is not restored, the MWDSLS increase will be 39%.
Insight #W8: Capital improvement investment for aging infrastructure is planned at
$85,718,000.
Insight #W9: The expenditure budget is proposed to decrease $1,264,243 or 0.61% of the
FY2024 amended budget.
SEWER UTILITY
14
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Sewer Utility Budget - Revenue Insights
Insight #S1: The estimated project cost to complete the Water Reclamation
Facility is $910,447,800. Funding for this project is accomplished through
revenue bonds, WIFIA loan and rate revenues.
Insight #S2: Rate stabilization is needed to offset revenue reductions from
conservation to cover operations and capital. This includes a 4% inflationary rate
increase and a service fee increase based on water meter size.
Insight #S3: Revenue bond issuance of $99,000,000 is planned in FY2025.
Insight #S4: The total revenue budget is $311,873,824, which is a decrease of
$226,543,083, or 42.08% from the FY2024 amended budget.
Revenue Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference Percent
Change
Operating Sales 76,303,000 76,303,000 87,915,632 11,612,632 15.22%
Interest 849,448 849,448 784,650 (64,798) -7.63%
Permits 267,500 267,500 267,500 - 0.00%
Other Revenues 171,000 171,000 1,132,002 961,002 561.99%
Bond/ Loan Proceeds 209,802,000 209,802,000 240,009,000 30,207,000 14.40%
Impact Fees 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 0.00%
Contribution 898,230 898,230 - (898,230) -100.00%
From (To) Reserves 11,891,444 248,475,729 (19,884,960) (268,360,689) -108.00%
Total 301,832,622$ 538,416,907$ 311,873,824$ (226,543,083)$ -42.08%
Projected Sewer Revenues for FY 2024-25
FY WIFIA Bonds Total
2020-2021 - 106,178,950 106,178,950
2021-2022 13,112,999 279,887,524 293,000,523
2022-2023 - - -
2023-2024 178,517,000 - 178,517,000
2024-2025 140,456,000 99,000,000 239,456,000
2025-2026 16,549,801 47,250,000 63,799,801
2026-2027 - 27,000,000 27,000,000
Total 348,635,800.00$ 559,316,474.00$ 907,952,274.00$
*Includes past issuances and utilitzation for New WRF.
Sewer Planned Debt*
15
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Sewer Utility Budget - Expenditure Insights
Insight #S5: The FY2025 budget includes $242,348,333 in planned projects. Of this amount, $213,575,333 is
designated for the new Water Reclamation Facility.
Insight #S6: The FY2025 budget proposes a decrease of $226,543,083, or 42.08%, of the FY2024 amended budget.
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference Percent
Change
Personal Services 15,388,675 15,388,675 16,650,547 1,261,872 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 3,396,134 3,671,048 4,155,306 484,258 13.19%
Charges for Services 11,679,448 12,001,217 13,331,559 1,330,342 11.09%
Debt Service 29,168,726 29,168,726 33,150,579 3,981,853 13.65%
Capital Outlay 2,884,866 2,933,960 2,237,500 (696,460) -23.74%
Capital Improvements 239,314,773 475,253,281 242,348,333 (232,904,948) -49.01%
Total 301,832,622$ 538,416,907$ 311,873,824$ (226,543,083)$ -42.08%
Proposed Sewer Expenditures for FY 2024-25
16
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Sewer Utility Rate Stabilization Fee
Class 2024
Current Fee
2025
Proposed
Fee
$ Change
3/4 - 7.22 7.22
1 - 21.21 21.21
1 1/2 - 56.50 56.50
2 - 56.50 56.50
3 - 287.81 287.81
4 - 287.81 287.81
6 - 287.81 287.81
8 - 287.81 287.81
10 - 287.81 287.81
Fixed Sewer fee based on water meter size.
Sewer Rate Stablization Fee
17
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Sewer Utility Monthly Rate Change Impact
2024
Account Type
Annualized
Average Winter
Water Usage (CCF)
Current Rate Proposed
Uage Rate Fixed Fee Total Sewer
Charge $ Changes
Residential Minimum Use 2 ccf $13.58 $14.12 $7.22 $21.34 $7.76
Residential Low Use 4 ccf $27.16 $28.24 $7.22 $35.46 $8.30
Residential Medium Use 8 ccf $54.32 $56.48 $7.22 $63.70 $9.38
Residential High Use 15 ccf $101.85 $105.90 $21.21 $127.11 $25.26
Industrial 2, 4 2,014 ccf $23,523.52 $24,470.10 $56.50 $24,526.60 $1,003.08
Commercial 2,1 34 ccf $262.48 $273.02 $56.50 $329.52 $67.04
*Industrial & Commercial charges are calculated based on flow rate, BOD and TSS. Fixed Fee is based on water meter size.
2025
STORMWATER UTILITY
18
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Stormwater Utility Budget - Revenue Insights
Insight #SW1: Proposed rate increase of 10%. Rate increases
between 5% and 10% are anticipated in future years through
FY2029.
Insight #SW2: Proposed bond issuance of $5,000,000.
Insight #SW3: The total revenue budget is $28,159,596, which is
an increase of $4,286,083, or 17.95% from the FY2024 amended
budget.
19
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Stormwater Utility Budget - Expenditure Insights
Insight #SW4: Proposed capitalization of $12,294,000 to renovate
portions of the stormwater collection system.
Insight #SW5: Proposed bond issuance of $5,000,000.
Insight #SW3: The total expenditure budget is $28,159,596, which
is an increase of $4,286,083, or 17.95% from the FY2024 amended
budget.
20
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Stormwater Utility Monthly Rate Change Impact
2024 2025
Account Type ERUs Current Rate Proposed
Rate $ Changes
Residential less than
.25 Acre Any ERU 7.57 8.33 0.76
Residential more than
.25 Acre Any ERU 10.57 11.63 1.06
Industrial 25 ERU 189.25 208.25 19.00
Commercial 10 ERU 75.70 83.30 7.60
STREET LIGHTING UTILITY
21
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Street Lighting Utility Budget - Revenue Insights
Insight #SL1: Proposed rate increase of 10%.
Insight #SL2: General Fund transfer of $20,000 to the Street Lighting Utility to maintain the City’s private lights
program. This is an ongoing General Fund program administered by Public Utilities.
Revenue
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended
Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Operating Sales 4,592,085 4,592,085 5,051,294 459,209 10.00%
Interest 44,000 44,000 42,594 (1,406) -3.20%
Other Revenues 25,100 25,100 100 (25,000) -99.60%
General Fund Contributions 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 0.00%
From (To) Reserves 1,362,964 1,470,778 1,662,775 191,997 13.05%
Total 6,044,149$ 6,151,963$ 6,776,763$ 624,800$ 10.16%
Projected Street Lighting Revenues for FY 2024-25
22
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Street Lighting Utility Budget - Expenditure Insights
Insight #SL3: The FY2025 budget includes $1,240,000 in capital investments.
Insight #SL4: The FY2025 budget proposes an increase of $624,800 or 10.16%, of the FY2024 amended budget.
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended
Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Personal Services 412,432 413,560 447,452 33,892 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 6,994 6,994 6,994 - 0.00%
Charges for Services 3,191,161 3,281,432 3,638,789 357,357 10.89%
Debt Service 193,562 193,562 193,528 (34) -0.02%
Capital Outlay 1,250,000 1,250,000
Capital Improvements 2,240,000 2,256,415 1,240,000 (1,016,415) -45.05%
Total 6,044,149$ 6,151,963$ 6,776,763$ 624,800$ 10.16%
Proposed Street Lighting Expenditures for FY 2024-25
23
PUBLIC UTILITIES FY2025 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Street Lighting Monthly Rate Change Impact
2024 2025
Flat Rate or
Block
Current Rate per
ERU
Proposed Rate
per ERU
Base 4.10 4.51 0.41
Group 1 6.24 6.86 0.62
Group 2 17.53 19.28 1.75
Group 3 48.20 53.02 4.82
$ Change
COMBINED RATE CHANGE MONTHLY IMPACT
24
2024 2025
Account Type Fund Monthly
Usage Meter Size Current
Rate
Proposed
Rate
$
Change
Water 6 ccf 3/4 25.73 26.75 1.03
Stabilization Fixed Fee 3/4 0.00 10.18 10.18
Sewer Class 1-1 2 ccf Combined Fee 13.58 14.12 0.54
Stabilization Fixed Fee Fixed Fee 0.00 7.22 7.22
Storm Single and Duplex <.25 Acre Flat Fee 7.57 8.33 0.76
Street Lighting Base Flat Fee 4.10 4.51 0.41
Total 50.98 71.11 20.14
Water 8 ccf 3/4 29.76 30.95 1.19
Stabilization Fixed Fee 3/4 0.00 10.18 10.18
Sewer Class 1-1 4 ccf Combined Fee 27.16 35.46 8.30
Stabilization Fixed Fee Fixed Fee 0.00 7.22 7.22
Storm Single and Duplex <.25 Acre Flat Fee 7.57 8.33 0.76
Street Lighting Group 1 Flat Fee 6.24 6.86 0.62
Total 70.73 99.00 28.27
Water 21 ccf 3/4 68.22 70.95 2.73
Stabilization Fixed 3/4 0.00 10.18 10.18
Sewer Class 1-1 8 ccf Combined Fee 54.32 63.70 9.38
Stabilization Fixed Fixed Fee 0.00 7.22 7.22
Storm Single and Duplex >.25 Acre Flat Fee 10.57 11.63 1.06
Street Lighting Group 1 Flat Fee 6.24 6.86 0.62
Total 139.35 170.54 31.19
Water 61 ccf 1 228.92 238.08 9.16
Stabilization Fixed 1 0.00 20.43 20.43
Sewer Class 1-1 15 ccf Combined Fee 101.85 127.11 25.26
Stabilization Fixed Fixed Fee 0.00 7.22 7.22
Storm Single and Duplex >.25 Acre Flat Fee 10.57 11.63 1.06
Street Lighting Group 2 Flat Fee 17.53 19.28 1.75
Total 358.87 423.75 64.88
* Sewer is based on prior year average winter water consumption
Residential Low
Use
Residential
Medium Use
Residential
High Use
Residential
Minimum Use
SELECT CITY CUSTOMERS
Combined Rate Change
AVERAGE MONTHLY Impact on Select City Customers
MWDSLS SCENARIO DISCUSSION
IMPACT OF NO CERTIFIED TAX RATE INCREASE
THANK YOU
Presented by Laura Briefer, Department Director and Lisa Tarufelli, Finance
Administrator
Table of Contents
BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 ......................................................... 1
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE BACKGROUND ......................................................................................
SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 1
SEWER UTILITY SPECIFIC INSIGHTS FOR FY2025......................................................................
STORMWATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND........................................................ 1
STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 1
STORMWATER UTILITY BUDGET INSIGHTS FOR FY2025 ..........................................................1
STREET LIGHTING UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND.................................................. 1
STREET LIGHTING INFRASTRUCTURE BACKGROUND ..................................................................1
STREET LIGHTING UTILITY BUDGET INSIGHTS FY 2025 ..........................................................1
COMBINED UTILITIES- BUDGET SUMMARY AND CASH FLOW ........................... 21
WATER UTILITY- BUDGET SUMMARY AND CASH FLOW.....................................2
SEWER UTILITY- BUDGET SUMMARY AND CASH FLOW .....................................4
STORMWATER UTILITY- BUDGET SUMMARY AND CASH FLOW.........................
STREET LIGHTING UTILITY- BUDGET SUMMARY AND CASH FLOW ..................5
APPENDIX A: RATE CHANGE COMPARISONS AND CUSTOMER IMPACTS...........6
APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION....................................................7
APPENDIX C: WATER UTILITY ALTERNATE BUDGET ..........................................9
BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU; City) is pleased to
present its recommended budget for fiscal year 2024-2025 (FY 2025). The FY
2025 budget includes funding for operations, maintenance, and capital
investments in the water, sewer, stormwater, and street lighting utilities.
SLCDPU operates each of its utilities as separate enterprise funds. The proposed
FY 2025 budget also includes a multi-year outlook through FY 2028-2029.
FY 2025 Budget Insights
SLCDPU’s FY 2025 budget presentation includes several important budget
insights, and because SLCDPU’s annual budgets tend to overlap previous and
future fiscal years, the FY 2025 insights continue many themes from the last
several years. The proposed budget and the five-year outlook include several
important overarching insights across the collective utilities operated by
SLCDPU:
Insight #1: Assessment and replacement of aging water, sewer, stormwater, and
street lighting infrastructure continues to be a high priority due to the critical
nature of these systems and the necessity to continue to provide a high level of
service, reliability, and compliance with federal and state regulations. This is
reflected in our short-term and long-term capital asset management plan.
Insight #2: Federal and state regulatory obligations are the primary direct and
indirect drivers of SLCDPU’s operational and capital expenditures in the Water,
Sewer, and Stormwater Utilities.
Insight #3:Inflationary pressures for all four utilities have increased the costs to
replace aging infrastructure, meet regulatory compliance requirements, and bond
for projects. This is especially impactful to generational projects, such as water
treatment and wastewater treatment facilities given the already large costs of
these projects.
Insight #4: At the same time costs of service are increasing, drought conditions
and decreased water usage over the last several years have a significant revenue
impact to the Water and Sewer Utilities, resulting in a less than 50% rate revenue
recovery. This rate revenue recovery is driving proposed rate stabilization
changes water and sewer fees to maintain financial health and resilience while
SLCDPU conducts the necessary programs to continue to meet water and sewer
service levels.
Insight #5:SLCDPU’s initiatives for FY 2025 are directly aligned with many of
the Mayor’s priorities for resiliency and organizational efficiency, including the
following:
Completion of Phase 1 design of a new Public Utilities campus.
Planning for a potential City employee daycare in the design of the new
Public Utilities campus.
Completion of new water, sewer, and stormwater rate studies.
Completion of a new impact fee study and facilities plan.
Update of the City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan to incorporate climate
resiliency.
Support implementation of recommendations from the citywide facility
water use audit.
Completion of an updated Watershed Management Plan.
Update water and utility bill assistance programs.
Move forward the City’s Growing Water Smart process.
Continue the repair and replacement of aging infrastructure.
Continue momentum of getting water to Great Salt Lake.
Move forward the Great Salt Lake shoreline preservation.
Insight #6: SLCDPU’s initiatives for FY 2025 are also aligned with several City
Council priorities:
Maintaining and updating infrastructure according to the needs of the
system and capacity of ratepayers and other stakeholders;
Environmental stewardship, including clear policy measures to preserve
and protect the watershed area and Great Salt Lake;
Appropriate and coherent water conservation measures at all City
facilities;
Inclusive financial modeling that accounts for generational equity and
economic variation across the City’s diverse populations;
Equitable rate structure that ensures water access and services, and
encourages water conservation and water stewardship;
Adequate compensation for all employees;
Transparent engagement with constituents and ratepayers on projects,
billing, financial forecasting, and long-term resilience and conservation;
and
Ongoing and proactive engagement with other governments at the state,
county, and municipal levels to protect resources.
Operational Programs for the Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Utilities
Insight #7: The budget matrix score for water, sewer, and stormwater operational
programs is 20 due to the direct public benefit, core service, mandate, and goals
of our elected officials for these critical services.
Environmental,
Social, and
Community Benefit
Reliance and Core
Service Mayor Goals Council Goals
Mandate/Legal
Obligation Total Score
Score 4 4 4 4 4
20
The FY 2025 budget reflects investment into existing water, sewer, and
stormwater operational programs to meet current and upcoming regulatory
requirements for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater. SLCDPU is
mandated to ensure drinking water quality, sewer effluent and stormwater
quality, and must administer the City’s water rights and water resources pursuant
to multiple state statutes.
There are several programs required under the federal and state Safe Drinking
Water Acts, including:
The federal Lead and Copper Rule and upcoming revisions;
The Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule #5;
Source water protection programs, including surface water and
groundwater protection. An example of this is the revision of the City’s
Watershed Management Plan; and
Water resiliency plans.
Programs required under the federal Clean Water Act and Utah Water Quality
Act include the implementation of the following:
The City’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit; and
The City’s Wastewater Discharge Permit under the Utah Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System.
Programs associated with the City’s water resources are required pursuant to
State statutes and rules. For FY 2025, this includes programs such as:
Annual water use reporting;
The state water rights adjudication;
Water resources planning;
Water conservation planning;
Great Salt Lake considerations; and
Water rate evaluations and studies.
Capital Programs for Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Utilities
Insight #8: Like SLCDPU’s operational programs, the overall budget matrix score
for capital programs for the Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Utilities scores on the
budget matrix due to public benefit, core service, mandates, and the goals of our
elected officials.
Capital programs associated with the City’s Water, Sewer, and Stormwater
Utilities are needed to ensure regulatory compliance and improve the reliability
of critical infrastructure. SLCDPU’s proposed FY 2025 budget continues planned
Environmental,
Social, and
Community Benefit
Reliance and Core
Service Mayor Goals Council Goals
Mandate/Legal
Obligation Total Score
Score 4 4 4 4 4
20
capital projects that have been anticipated over the previous several years. Of
note, the FY 2025 budget has significant continued investment in the City’s aging
vertical infrastructure:
Reconstruction of the City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) to meet
Clean Water Act requirements, anticipated to continue through 2026;
The design and construction to rehabilitate the City’s three drinking water
treatment plants that were installed in the 1950’s; and
Continued rehabilitation work on Mountain Dell Dam and other City-
owned dams.
The capital budget also includes horizontal infrastructure rehabilitation,
including water, sewer, and stormwater conveyance lines, some of which are
associated with road reconstruction projects.
Street Lighting Utility Operations and Capital Programs
Insight #9: The budget matrix score for Street Lighting Operations and Capital
Programs is 16. Public way lighting supports aspects of livability and public
safety. In addition, there is a legal obligation to provide public way lighting, and it
is a core service of the City.
The Street Lighting Utility is prioritizing the replacement of lights to improve
energy efficiency and Dark Skies compliance.
Summary of Expenditures and Revenues
The total proposed FY 2025 budget is $553,114,955, a 28.72% decrease from the
FY 2024 amended budget of $776,011,398. The FY 2024 adopted budget was
adjusted for FY 2023 carryover encumbrances for open contracts, purchase
orders, and amendments. Those changes are reflected in the amended budget
amount.
The proposed operating budget of $151,464,015 is $14,070,735 or 10.24% higher
than the current year amended budget. The increase includes a 5.0% increase to
accommodate employee compensation and benefit changes. Amounts paid to
other departments for IMS charges, administrative service fees, payment in lieu
of taxes, and risk management is projected to increase by $1,552,043.
Operational costs also reflect a $540,070 increase to be paid to the Metropolitan
Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy (MWDSLS) pursuant to their projected
increased operational and capital needs.
The proposed capital budget for FY 2025 is $341,600,333. Debt service is
anticipated to be $47,367,107. Funding for capital projects in FY 2025 will be
Environmental,
Social, and
Community Benefit
Reliance and Core
Service Mayor Goals Council Goals
Mandate/Legal
Obligation Total Score
Score 4 4 2 2 4
16
generated through rate revenue, bond proceeds from Series 2022 and planned
2025 issues, a federal grant, and a federal loan.
There are proposed rate increases for the Water, Sewer, and Stormwater Utilities.
This includes modest usage rate increases at the inflation rate of 4% for the Water
and Sewer utilities, along with an increase in the service fees of $10.18 for the
Water Utility and $7.22 for the Sewer Utility (example fee for smallest meter
size). The service fee increases for the Water and Sewer Utilities reflect a rate
stabilization effort that will help offset the poor usage rate revenue recovery of
previous years so that the capital and operational programs can continue in
future years for these utilities. There are also proposed rate increases of 10% in
the Stormwater Utility, and a 10% increase in Street Lighting rates. Appendix A
includes a summary of expected customer rate impacts.
Funds Operations Capital Debt Fund Totals
Water 100,720,648 93,234,500 12,349,624 206,304,772
Sewer 34,137,412 244,585,833 33,150,579 311,873,824
Storm 12,512,720 13,973,500 1,673,376 28,159,596
Street 4,093,235 2,490,000 193,528 6,776,763
Total 151,464,015$ 354,283,833$ 47,367,107$ 553,114,955$
Summary of Utilities Fund Budgets FY 2025
Revenue
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Operating Sales 187,495,291 187,495,291 227,531,783 40,036,492 21.35%
Interest 1,468,936 1,468,936 1,558,134 89,198 6.07%
Permits 267,500 267,500 267,500 - 0.00%
Interfund Charges 4,215,396 4,215,396 4,638,504 423,108 10.04%
Other Revenues 1,827,190 1,827,190 3,520,747 1,693,557 92.69%
Impact Fees 4,400,000 4,400,000 4,400,000 - 0.00%
Contributions 14,275,230 14,275,230 40,790,000 26,514,770 185.74%
Bond/Loan Proceeds 277,176,000 277,176,000 345,595,000 68,419,000 24.68%
From (To) Reserves 17,652,489 284,885,855 (75,186,713) (360,072,568) -126.39%
Total 508,778,032$ 776,011,398$ 553,114,955$(222,896,443)$ -28.72%
Projected Department of Public Utilities Revenues for FY 2024-25
Summary of Additional Proposed Positions/Personnel Changes
Insight #10: The proposed budget includes the addition of a Deputy Finance
Administrator for SLCDPU. This position will be created using an existing vacancy
within the Finance Division. This position is needed to address succession and
increased workload associated with financial planning and the multi-year process
to change SLCDPU’s billing system.
SLCDPU currently has 495FTEs and is not proposing any additional FTE positions
for FY 2025.
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Personal Services 54,251,832 54,252,960 58,701,685 4,448,725 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 9,761,269 10,273,610 12,008,822 1,735,212 16.89%
Charges for Services 69,447,361 72,866,710 80,753,508 7,886,798 10.82%
Debt Service 41,267,908 41,267,908 47,367,107 6,099,199 14.78%
Capital Outlay 10,849,889 11,287,497 12,683,500 1,396,003 12.37%
Capital Improvements 323,199,773 586,062,713 341,600,333 (244,462,380) -41.71%
Total 508,778,032$ 776,011,398$ 553,114,955$(222,896,443)$ -28.72%
Proposed Department of Public Utilities Expenditures for FY 2024-25
Water Utility Enterprise Fund
Water Infrastructure Background
The Salt Lake City water system is one of the oldest and largest systems
west of the Mississippi River with over 1,129 miles of 12-inch or smaller
distribution lines, and more than 192 miles of large transmission mains for a total
asset inventory of 1,321 miles of pipe with over fifty pressure zones. The service
area covers the Salt Lake City corporate boundaries as well as the east side of the
Salt Lake Valley to the mouth of Little Cottonwood Canyon—a total of 141 square
miles. This includes water supply to portions of other incorporated cities such as
Mill Creek, Cottonwood Heights, Holladay, Murray, Midvale, and South Salt Lake
Cities.
SLCDPU’s asset management program includes personnel and systems to assess
the condition of the large water transmission mains, distribution mains,
treatment and pumping plants, reservoirs, tanks, wells, canals, and other
infrastructure to assure repair and replacement is completed with minimal
impact to the public.
Addressing aging water infrastructure through rehabilitation and replacement is
a priority and is the primary reason behind gradual rate increases planned for the
next few years in the Water Utility. For instance, each of SLCDPU’s three water
treatment plants were originally constructed in the 1950’s and have undergone or
are undergoing numerous upgrades. Based on recent condition assessments,
SLCDPU is preparing a strategy to replace these treatment plants in future years
to ensure this critical infrastructure remains viable for the long-term protection
of public health and can better withstand major seismic events. There is also a
continual need to repair and replace pipe segments to maintain water service and
reduce emergency repair costs and impacts to the public.
Water Utility Revenue and Expenditure Insights for the FY 2025
Budget
Revenue Insights
Insight #W1: Water Utility customers were very successful in significant water
conservation during drought conditions and are anticipated to continue a similar
trend of conservation due to drought and a desire to protect Great Salt Lake
water levels.
Insight #W2: Revenue reductions over the last two years due to reduced water
consumption are significant, causing a shift to rate stabilization.
Insight #W3: Usage rate increases for the Water Utility have performed relatively
poorly in revenue generation over the last six years.
Insight #W4: Due to the significant previous years revenue reductions and
anticipated continued conservation in future years, SLCDPU is pursuing a 4%
usage rate increase to account for annual inflation in combination with an
increase to the fixed fee (established by meter size) to improve revenue reliability.
Rate increases are anticipated in future years but will be refined once SLCDPU
finishes a comprehensive rate study during FY 2025.
Insight #W5: The revenue budget is proposed to decrease by 1,264,243 or 0.61%
from the FY 2024 budget. The proposed Water Utility revenue budget for FY
2025 by major category is as follows:
Operating Sales: Revenue is expected to be 28.60% more than FY 2024 budgeted
levels. The proposed budget is based on utilization of a 4% rate increase and a
service fee increase for rate stabilization purposes.
Interest Income: Interest earnings are expected to remain consistent.
Interfund Charges: The Water Utility is reimbursed by sewer, stormwater, street
lighting, refuse, and the Hive program for services related to billing. Related
revenue is anticipated to increase based on actual costs.
Revenue Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference Percent
Change
Operating Sales 93,046,300 93,046,300 119,655,560 26,609,260 28.60%
Interest 456,502 456,502 463,989 7,487 1.64%
Interfund Charges 4,215,396 4,215,396 4,638,504 423,108 10.04%
Other Revenues 1,568,090 1,568,090 2,325,645 757,555 48.31%
Impact Fees 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - 0.00%
Contributions 13,005,000 13,005,000 38,770,000 25,765,000 198.12%
Bond Proceeds 62,346,000 62,346,000 100,558,000 38,212,000 100.00%
From (To) Reserves 1,316,499 30,931,727 (62,106,926) (93,038,653) -300.79%
Total 177,953,787$ 207,569,015$ 206,304,772$(1,264,243)$ -0.61%
Projected Water Revenues for FY 2024-25
Bond Proceeds: The FY 2024 anticipated bond issuance of $62,000,000 will be
combined with the planned FY 2025 bond issuance of $38,000,000. A total of
$100,000,000 is anticipated during FY 2025.
Contributions: BRIC grant funding for City Creek Treatment plant of $31,500,000
and low interest loan proceeds for Lead and Copper of $6,700,000 are anticipated
in FY 2025.
Reserve Funds: SLCDPU plans to transfer $62,106,926 to reserves.
Water Utility Expenditure Insights
Insight #W6: The Water Utility’s FY 2025 budget includes an increase of
$2,718,363 in personal services. The increase in personal services is attributed to
a 5.0% increase to accommodate employee compensation changes, an increase in
additional pay, and benefit changes.
Insight #W7: Wholesale water costs through the Metropolitan Water District of
Salt Lake and Sandy (MWDSLS) is projected to increase in FY 2025 without
increases to operational or assessment charges. A 3% increase is included in this
budget. This increase may be more significant, at 39%, should the Sandy City and
Salt Lake City Councils not approve the proposed restoration of the Certified Tax
Rate to .00035. Appendix C includes the budget scenario for the Water Utility
should the Certified Tax Rate not be approved by both Councils.
Insight #W8: SLCDPU plans to invest $85,718,000 in capital improvements for
Water Utility infrastructure in FY 2025. The capital improvement program
includes a prioritized balance of needed improvements to treatment plants, water
lines, dams, meter replacements, pump stations, wells, and other infrastructure.
With construction costs escalating, SLCDPU is cautiously resuming its plans for
gradual rate increases and investment into aging infrastructure this year.
Insight #W9: The expenditure budget for the Water Utility is proposed to
decrease by $1,264,243 or 0.61% from the FY 2024 amended budget. The
proposed budget for FY 2025 by major category is as follows:
Personal Services: Employee-related costs are estimated to increase $2,718,363
or 8.20%. The FY 2025 budget includes a 5.0% increase to accommodate
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference Percent
Change
Personal Services 33,150,755 33,150,755 35,869,118 2,718,363 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 5,973,044 6,136,400 7,182,025 1,045,625 17.04%
Charges for Services 48,973,599 51,674,139 57,669,505 5,995,366 11.60%
Debt Service 10,170,366 10,170,366 12,349,624 2,179,258 21.43%
Capital Outlay 5,586,023 5,925,443 7,516,500 1,591,057 26.85%
Capital Improvements 74,100,000 100,511,912 85,718,000 (14,793,912) -14.72%
Total 177,953,787$ 207,569,015$ 206,304,772$(1,264,243)$ -0.61%
Proposed Water Expenditures for FY 2024-25
employee compensation and benefit changes. Additional negotiated changes not
included in the current budget and compensation adjustments are included.
Materials & Supplies: The increase is attributed to increased permitting and
chemical costs.
Charges for Services: The proposed budget for charges and services will increase
$5,995,366 or 11.60%. Increases in professional services for Lead and Copper are
included in this category.
Debt Service: In compliance with current bond issues and in anticipation of the
Series 2025 debt, the budget for debt services is projected to increase by
$2,179,258.
Capital Outlay: The proposed budget for capital outlay for FY 2025 includes
$1,500,000 dedicated to the City’s watershed purchase account, $250,000 for
water right and company purchases, $250,000 for water stock purchases,
$150,000 for additional land purchases, $2,159,000 for 25 vehicles, $1,052,500
for field equipment, $155,000 for non-motive equipment, and $2,000,000 for
year 1 of the replacement billing software.
Capital Improvements: The proposed capital improvement budget for FY 2025 is
$85,718,000. A detailed list of capital improvement projects is included in the
cash flow summaries for the water utility. A capital project summary by facility
type is as follows:
Type of Project
Proposed Budget
2024-2025
Treatment Plants 62,850,000
Water Service Connections 6,450,000
Pumping Plant Upgrades 320,000
Reservoirs 1,375,000
Water Mains and Hydrants 10,093,000
Wells 2,000,000
Culverts, Flumes, and Bridges 2,550,000
Buildings 80,000
Total 85,718,000$
Proposed Water Capital Improvement Program
for FY 2024-25
Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund
Sewer Infrastructure Background
The City’s Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) was constructed in 1965 and has
undergone numerous upgrades since. Nutrient removal regulations adopted by
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ) in 2015 require a new
sewage treatment process. After much study, SLCDPU determined that the WRF
has reached the end of its useful life and adapting the 55-year-old facility to meet
the new nutrient removal requirements is not feasible. A new WRF is currently
under construction, to be completed in 2026. SLCDPU has been implementing a
financing strategy of gradual rate increases, revenue bonding and a low interest
federal loan for the replacement of the WRF. SLCDPU is also currently exploring
grant opportunities for components of the project to help reduce costs to
ratepayers and decrease the debt burden. Inflationary pressures have resulted in
increasing the projected cost of the new WRF to $910,447,800, requiring
additional financing and construction strategies to be implemented, primarily
additional revenue bonds to pay for the project increases and deferral of portions
of the project to a later date.
The sewer collection system (678 miles of pipeline, and several pump stations) is
a very challenging environment; hydrogen sulfide gases, sediment, roots and
other factors affect the competency of the collection lines. SLCDPU’s asset
management program includes personnel and systems to assess the condition of
the sewer collection system, pump stations, and other infrastructure to assure
repair and replacement is completed with minimal impact to the public. More
than 38% of the sewer collection system is greater than 80 years old.
The sewer collection system capacity has expanded in recent years, in large part
to meet growth requirements related to the new State Correctional Facility, the
Airport expansion, new development occurring in the Northwest Quadrant of Salt
Lake City, and infill high density development. Capacity needs created by new
development is paid for by developers.
Sewer Utility Specific Insights for FY 2025
New Water Reclamation Facility Construction Insights
Insight #S1: The estimated project cost to complete the WRF is now
$910,447,800. Construction began in FY 2020 and SLCDPU has expended
approximately $303.2 million to date on this project.
Current financing for the new WRF is anticipated to be accomplished primarily
using a combination of revenue bonds, user rates, and a federal loan through the
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA). The loan will provide
up to 49% of the anticipated cost of the new WRF as submitted in 2020
($711,725,000). The interest rate at loan closing in 2020 was extremely favorable
at 1.34%. This is expected to save SLCDPU’s ratepayers more than $100 million
over the life of the project compared to revenue bonds. Debt plans have been
revised due to increased estimated project costs. SLCDPU is also seeking federal
grants for components of the project to reduce the reliance on debt.
Sewer Utility Revenue Insights
Insight #S2:A proposed 4% inflationary rate increase is anticipated to generate
an additional $1,251,369 in sewer fees. A proposed service fee increase (based on
water meter size) is anticipated to generate $10,361,263 in additional revenues.
Proposed sales revenues are based on the best estimates available. The
additional revenue is required for the sewer utility to meet its capital and
operations objectives. Rate and service fee increases in future years are also
anticipated at this time, but the structure and estimation of these increases will
be refined once SLCDPU’s rate study is completed this year.
Insight #S3: SLCDPU planned bond issuance for FY 2025 is anticipated to be
$99,000,000. Additional bonded debt of $74,250,000 is anticipated from FY
2026 to FY 2027 to meet capital objectives, primarily the reconstruction of the
WRF. It is anticipated that WIFIA loan proceeds of $16,549,801 will be utilized
during the same period. Debt will be used in conjunction with rate increases to
FY WIFIA Bonds Total
2020-2021 - 106,178,950 106,178,950
2021-2022 13,112,999 279,887,524 293,000,523
2022-2023 - - -
2023-2024 178,517,000 - 178,517,000
2024-2025 140,456,000 99,000,000 239,456,000
2025-2026 16,549,801 47,250,000 63,799,801
2026-2027 - 27,000,000 27,000,000
Total 348,635,800.00$ 559,316,474.00$ 907,952,274.00$
*Includes past issuances and utilitzation for New WRF.
Sewer Planned Debt*
blend pay as you go and borrowing strategies. The proposed debt is for a 30-year
term creating intergenerational equity payback on the new WRF facility. The
City’s professional financial advisors have been involved in the process to
measure debt service and ratios to comply with external rating agency standards.
SLCDPU intends to maintain its AAA rating to limit costs of borrowing.
Insight #S4: The total revenue budget is expected to decrease by $226,543,083 or
42.08% to $311,873,824 from the FY 2024 amended budget. The proposed
budget for FY 2025 by major category is as follows:
Sewer service fees: Sewer fee revenues are expected to increase $11,612,632 or
15.22%. This includes a 4% inflationary rate increase and a sewer rate stabilization
fee based on water meter size.
Interest Income: Interest earnings are expected to decrease due to spending of
bond proceeds.
Permit Fees: No change is anticipated.
Other Revenues: Lease proceeds are responsible for the increase.
Impact Fees: No change is anticipated.
Bond Proceeds: Issuance of $99,000,000 of revenue bonds is anticipated in FY
2025.
Loan Proceeds: The budget anticipates utilizing $140,456,000 in WIFIA loan
proceeds.
Contribution: Decreased and properly categorized as other revenues.
Reserve Funds: Unspent bond proceeds of $19,884,960 will be transferred to
reserves for use on the WRF project.
Sewer Utility Expenditure Insights
Insight #S5: The proposed sewer budget for FY 2025 includes $242,348,333 in
planned projects. Of this amount $213,575,333 is designated for the new WRF,
$1,450,000 for the existing WRF, $2,500,000 for lift stations, and $24,993,000
for improvements to the sewer collections system.
Revenue Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference Percent
Change
Operating Sales 76,303,000 76,303,000 87,915,632 11,612,632 15.22%
Interest 849,448 849,448 784,650 (64,798) -7.63%
Permits 267,500 267,500 267,500 - 0.00%
Other Revenues 171,000 171,000 1,132,002 961,002 561.99%
Bond/ Loan Proceeds 209,802,000 209,802,000 240,009,000 30,207,000 14.40%
Impact Fees 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 0.00%
Contribution 898,230 898,230 -(898,230) -100.00%
From (To) Reserves 11,891,444 248,475,729 (19,884,960) (268,360,689) -108.00%
Total 301,832,622$ 538,416,907$ 311,873,824$(226,543,083)$ -42.08%
Projected Sewer Revenues for FY 2024-25
Insight #S6: The sewer utility’s FY 2025 budget proposes a decrease of
$226,543,083 or 42.08% from the FY 2024 amended budget. The proposed
budget for FY 2025 by major category is as follows:
Personal Services: Employee-related costs are estimated to increase $1,261,872
or 8.20%. The FY 2025 budget includes a 5.0% increase to accommodate
employee compensation and benefit changes. Additional negotiated changes not
included in the current budget and compensation adjustments are included.
Materials & Supplies: The sewer utility’s budget for this category increased by
$484,258. The change is attributed rising costs of supplies including chemical
purchases.
Charges for Services: Increases in professional and contractual services and
additional utility costs.
Debt Service: The annual debt service budget is expected to increase by
$3,981,853 in FY 2025. The increase is attributed to payments on existing debt
and includes interest payments for the Series 2025 debt.
Capital Outlay: The proposed capital outlay budget for FY 2025 includes
$315,000 for 7 vehicles and trucks, $610,500 for field maintenance equipment,
$62,000 for non-motive equipment, and $1,250,000 for year 1 of replacement
billing software costs.
Capital Improvements: The proposed capital improvement budget for FY 2025 is
$242,348,333. a decrease of $226,426,511Y from the current year amended
budget. A detailed list of capital improvement projects is included in the cash flow
summary for the sewer utility. A capital project summary by facility type is as
follows:
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference Percent
Change
Personal Services 15,388,675 15,388,675 16,650,547 1,261,872 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 3,396,134 3,671,048 4,155,306 484,258 13.19%
Charges for Services 11,679,448 12,001,217 13,331,559 1,330,342 11.09%
Debt Service 29,168,726 29,168,726 33,150,579 3,981,853 13.65%
Capital Outlay 2,884,866 2,933,960 2,237,500 (696,460) -23.74%
Capital Improvements 239,314,773 475,253,281 242,348,333 (232,904,948) -49.01%
Total 301,832,622$ 538,416,907$ 311,873,824$(226,543,083)$ -42.08%
Proposed Sewer Expenditures for FY 2024-25
Proposed Budget
2024-2025
214,575,333
24,993,000
2,500,000
Buildings 280,000
242,348,333$
Proposed Sewer Capital Improvement Program for
FY 2024-25
Type of Project
WRF
Collection System
Lift Stations
Total
Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund
Stormwater Infrastructure Background
The City’s stormwater system includes 350 miles of stormwater collection lines,
76 miles of canals and drainage ditches, 32 miles of open channel creeks and
rivers, culverts, 27 lift stations, and 63 detention basins. These systems must be
maintained to prevent flooding and to meet the water quality requirements in the
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. SLCDPU is also
responsible for all city facilities meeting MS4 requirements. A new MS4 was
issued to the City in June 2021, with resulting updated requirements that are
being implemented.
A Drainage Master Plan was completed in 1993. The FY 2025 budget includes the
continuation of an update of the Drainage Master Plan to include water quality
and climate change issues, such as storm intensification, in addition to
traditional conveyance.
Stormwater Utility Budget Insights for FY2024
Stormwater Utility Revenue Insights
Insight #SW1: SLCDPU is proposing a rate increase of 10% in FY 2025. Rate
increases between 5% and 10% are anticipated in future years through FY 2029 in
order to maintain and rehabilitate infrastructure and meet more stringent water
quality requirements.
Insight #SW2: A $5,000,000 bond issuance is planned during FY 2025.
Insight #SW3: The revenue budget is proposed to increase by $4,286,083 or
17.95% from the FY 2024 amended budget. The proposed revenue budget for FY
2025 by major category is as follows:
Operating Sales: Revenue is expected to increase by approximately 10%.
Interest Income: Interest earnings are expected to increase due to higher cash
balances and increased rates.
Revenue
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Operating Sales 13,553,906 13,553,906 14,909,297 1,355,391 10.00%
Interest 118,986 118,986 266,901 147,915 124.31%
Other Revenues 63,000 63,000 63,000 - 0.00%
Impact Fees 750,000 750,000 750,000 - 0.00%
Contributions 352,000 352,000 2,000,000 1,648,000 468.18%
Bond Proceeds 5,028,000 5,028,000 5,028,000 - 100.00%
From (To) Reserves 3,081,582 4,007,621 5,142,398 1,134,777 28.32%
Total 22,947,474$ 23,873,513$ 28,159,596$ 4,286,083$17.95%
Projected Storm Revenues for FY 2024-25
Other Revenues: Other revenues include permits, fines, and reimbursements. No
change is anticipated.
Contributions: ARPA funding of $2,000,000 is expected to be received during FY
2025.
Impact Fees: No change is anticipated.
Bond Proceeds: Issuance of $5,000,000 of revenue bonds is anticipated in FY
2025.
Reserve Funds: Reserves of $5,142,398 will be utilized for stormwater system
improvements.
Stormwater Utility Expenditure Insights
Insight #SW4: The Stormwater Utility’s FY 2025 budget proposes capitalizing
$12,294,000 to renovate portions of the stormwater collection system.
Insight #SW5: The expenditure budget for the Stormwater Utility is proposed to
increase $4,286,083 or 17.95%. The proposed budget for fiscal year FY 2025 by
major category is as follows:
Personal Services: Employee-related costs are estimated to increase to $434,598
or 8.20%. The FY 2025 budget includes a 5.0% increase to accommodate
employee compensation and benefit changes. Additional negotiated changes not
included in the current budget and compensation adjustments are included.
Materials and Supplies: The increase is due to increased parts and maintenance
supply costs.
Charges for Services: Other professional services and fleet costs are anticipated to
increase in FY 2025.
Debt Service: The annual debt service budget is expected to decrease by $61,878
in FY 2025.
Capital Outlay: The proposed capital outlay budget for FY 2025 includes
$190,000 for three vehicles, $239,500 for field maintenance equipment, and
$1,250,000 for year 1 of replacement billing software costs.
Major
Expenditure
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Personal Services 5,299,970 5,299,970 5,734,568 434,598 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 385,097 459,168 664,497 205,329 44.72%
Charges for Services 5,603,153 5,909,922 6,113,655 203,733 3.45%
Debt Service 1,735,254 1,735,254 1,673,376 (61,878) -3.57%
Capital Outlay 2,379,000 2,428,094 1,679,500 (748,594) -30.83%
Capital Improvements 7,545,000 8,041,105 12,294,000 4,252,895 52.89%
Total 22,947,474$ 23,873,513$ 28,159,596$ 4,286,083$ 17.95%
Proposed Storm Expenditures for FY 2024-25
Capital Improvements: The proposed capital improvement budget for FY 2025 is
$12,294,000, an increase of $4,252,895 from the FY 2024 amended budget. A
detailed list of capital improvement projects is provided in the cash flow summary
for the stormwater utility. The capital project summary by facility types are as
follows:
Proposed
Budget
2,605,000
5,914,000
100,000
40,000
Detention Basins 3,635,000
12,294,000$
Lift Stations
Landscaping
Total
Type of Project
Lines and Riparian Corridor Projects
Proposed Storm Capital Improvement
Buildings
Street Lighting Utility Enterprise Fund
Street Lighting Infrastructure Background
SLCDPU’s Street Lighting Master Plan balances safety, character, responsibility
to public health and the environment, and equity using a series of plan
guideposts for evaluating the illuminated environment and the technical
elements of a streetlighting system. SLCDPU anticipates revising the street
lighting cost of service and rate study, as well as preparing a programmatic and
systematic approach to implementation of the 2020 master plan.
Of the 15,860 lights that the City maintains, more than 60% are now considered
to be energy efficient. The FY 2025 budget funds implementation of the 2020
Street Lighting Master Plan, as well as the continued conversion to high
efficiency lights.
Street Lighting Utility Budget Insights FY 2024
Street Lighting Utility Revenue Insights
Insight #SL1: A rate increase of 10% is proposed for the Street Lighting Utility in
order to keep up with inflationary costs and implement the street lighting master
plan. FY 2025 rates are $4.51 for base, Tier 1 $6.86, Tier 2 $19.28, and Tier 3
$53.02.
Insight #SL2: Continuation of the private lights program is proposed in the FY
2025 budget. The program includes a $20,000 transfer from the General Fund
and indicates the on-going desire of the City to provide matching support to
reduce the capital costs to neighborhoods installing private street lighting.
SLCDPU administers this program and encourages Dark Skies lighting on private
lights in the program.
The revenue budget is proposed to increase by $624,800 or 10.16% from the FY
2024 budget. The proposed budget for FY 2025 by major category is as follows:
Operating Sales: Revenue is expected to increase by approximately 10%.
Interest Income: Interest earnings are anticipated to decrease due to declining
cash balance.
Other Revenues: Revised based on current year revenues.
General Fund Contributions: Anticipated FY 2025 contribution from General
Fund.
Reserve Funds: The FY 2025 budget anticipates using $1,662,775fromthe utility’s
reserve funds.
Street Lighting Utility Expenditure Insights
Insight #SL3: Street Lighting Utility capital improvements totaling $1,240,000
are planned in the FY 2025 budget. The Street Lighting Capital Program focuses
on high efficiency and system upgrades in neighborhood, arterial and collector
Revenue
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended
Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Operating Sales 4,592,085 4,592,085 5,051,294 459,209 10.00%
Interest 44,000 44,000 42,594 (1,406) -3.20%
Other Revenues 25,100 25,100 100 (25,000) -99.60%
General Fund Contributions 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 0.00%
From (To) Reserves 1,362,964 1,470,778 1,662,775 191,997 13.05%
Total 6,044,149$ 6,151,963$ 6,776,763$ 624,800$ 10.16%
Projected Street Lighting Revenues for FY 2024-25
streets per the 2020 Street Lighting Master Plan. This includes replacement of
outdated induction lighting with LED and replacement of cactus poles.
Insight #SL4: The expenditure budget for the Street Lighting Utility is proposed
to increase $624,800 or 10.16% from the FY 2024 amended budget. The
proposed budget for FY 2025 by major category is as follows:
Personal Services: Employee-related costs are estimated to increase $33,892 or
8.20%. The FY 2025 budget includes a 5.0% increase to accommodate employee
compensation and benefit changes. Additional benefit changes not included in
the current budget and compensation adjustments are included.
Charges for Services: The proposed budget for charges and services increases
$450,626 or 14.13% in FY 2025 due to increased costs in technical services.
Debt Service: In compliance with the outstanding Series 2017 Bond, budgeted
debt service payments will decrease slightly from FY 2024.
Capital Outlay: The proposed budget includes $1,250,000 for year 1 of
replacement billing software costs.
Capital Improvements: The proposed capital improvement budget for FY 2025 is
$1,240,000, a decrease of $1,106,415 from the FY 2024 amended budget. A capital
projects summary by facility type is as follows for base lighting and all enhanced
tiers:
Major Expenditure
Categories
Adopted Budget
2023-2024
Amended
Budget
2023-2024
Proposed Budget
2024-2025 Difference
Percent
Change
Personal Services 412,432 413,560 447,452 33,892 8.20%
Materials and Supplies 6,994 6,994 6,994 - 0.00%
Charges for Services 3,191,161 3,281,432 3,638,789 357,357 10.89%
Debt Service 193,562 193,562 193,528 (34) -0.02%
Cap al Outlay 1,250,000 1,250,000
Capital Improvements 2,240,000 2,256,415 1,240,000 (1,016,415) -45.05%
Total 6,044,149$ 6,151,963$ 6,776,763$ 624,800$ 10.16%
Proposed Street Lighting Expenditures for FY 2024-25
Proposed Budget
2024-2025
1,240,000
1,240,000.00$
System upgrades for high efficiency and uniformity - Base Tiers 1-3
Total
Type of Project
Proposed Street Lighting Capital Improvement Program for FY 2024-2025
Combined Utilities- Budget Summary and Cash Flow
PUBLIC UTILITIES
COMBINED WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER, AND STREET LIGHTING CASH FLOW
FY 2025 BUDGET AND FY 2026-2029 FORECAST
(3,775,443)(4,671,160) (4,421,206) (3,786,854) (3,938,328)
CC51200 SC530204
4400 2015-0460 DISTRIBUTION AND ELECTRICAL BARN 4 4 850,000
4400 PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND FEASIBILITY 5 5 400,000 45,000,000
4400 2018-1015 Potable Water Transport Tanker Vehicle 2 0 250,000
4400 2023-1068 Irrigation Shop Improvements - Electrical and Roofing 5 5 200,000
4400 West Campus Builiding Modifications/Upgrades 80,000
400,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ 46,100,000$
CC51101 SC530222
4400 512627489 2022-1101 WATER PLANTS CAPITAL PROJECT SUPPORT (FY 23/24) 5 5
Funded by BRIC Grant 700,000
Funded by DPU 950,000
4400 2023-1158 WATER PLANTS CAPITAL PROJECT SUPPORT (ANNUAL) 5 5
Funded by BRIC Grant
Funded by DPU 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000
4400 512627488 2022-1102 WATER PLANTS COMPLIANCE PROJECTS FY 23/24 5 5 2,000,000
4400 2023-1159 WATER PLANTS COMPLIANCE PROJECTS (ANNUAL) 5 5 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 22,000,000
700,000 - - - - - -
2,950,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 3,400,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 22,000,000
3,650,000$ 3,400,000$ 3,400,000$ 3,400,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ 22,000,000$
CC51300 SC530222
4400 512260079 2017-2043 Treatment Plant Upgrades 5 5
Funded by BRIC Grant 1,200,000
Funded by DPU 500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 1,000,000
4400 512260095 2022-1090
City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades - CM/GC 5 5
Funded by BRIC Grant 350,000
Funded by DPU 150,000
4400 512260096 2021-1095 City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades - BRIC Package 5 5
Funded by BRIC Grant 8,400,000 31,500,000 5,180,000
Funded by DPU 3,600,000 13,500,000 31,220,000 5,000,000
4400 512260084 2020-1075 City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades - Public Engagement 5 5
Funded by BRIC Grant 200,000
Funded by DPU 90,000 300,000
300,000
2021-1094 CITY CREEK TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES - SOLIDS PROCESSING 5 5 12,000,000
4400 512260098 2023-1059 City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades - Project Facilitation 5 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
4400 512260097 2023-1019 City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades - Visual Documentation 5 0 100,000
10,150,000 31,500,000 5,180,000 - - - -
4,340,000 16,000,000 34,120,000 6,100,000 100,000 - 12,000,000
14,490,000$ 47,500,000$ 39,300,000$ 6,100,000$ 100,000$ -$ 12,000,000$
CC51301 SC530222
4400 512450090 2021-1052 Parleys Entrance Gate Replacement Project 5 1
4400 512450088 2020-1183
Parleys WTP - Raw Water Intake & Priority Improvements II 5 4 12,000,000 20,000,000
4400 512450093 2022-1031 PARLEYS WTP - BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 4 5 12,000,000
4400 2021-1053 Parleys WTP Access Control Improvements 4 0 1,050,000
4400 2021-1016 Parleys WTP Backwash Tank Improvements 4 3 500,000
4400 2021-1097
Parleys WTP Rebuild - Alternatives Analysis 4 0
500,000
4400 2020-1182 Parleys WTP - Filter Rehab 4 4 16,000,000
4400 2020-1179 Parleys WTP New Chemical Facilities 5 4 20,000,000
4400 2020-1181 Parleys WTP - Electrical Building & Upgrades 5 4 12,500,000
4400 2020-1190
Parleys WTP Filters & Operations Bldg Rebuild & Reservoir 4 4
94,000,000
4400 2020-1184 Parleys WTP - Stilling Tower and Basin Rebuild 5 4 2,100,000
4400 2020-1188 Parleys WTP - Clarifier and Clarifier Pump Station Rebuild 4 4 4,500,000
4400 2020-1189 Parleys WTP - PAC Storage & Feed 4 4 5,500,000
4400 2023-1020
Parleys WTP Elevator Replacement 4 4
250,000
-$ 750,000$ -$ -$ 12,000,000$ 20,000,000$ 168,150,000$
CC51302 SC530222
4400 512627476 2020-1069 Big Cottonwood WTP Rebuild 5 4 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 30,000,000
4400 512627484 2020-1134
Big Cottonwood WTP Rebuild - CM/GC (Design Phase)5 4
3,000,000
4400 2022-1129 BIG COTTONWOOD WTP REBUILD - CM/GC (CONSTRUCTION)5 4 215,000,000
4400 512627479 2020-1093 BIG COTTONWOOD WTP REBUILD - PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 5 4 3,000,000
4400 2023-1023 BIG COTTONWOOD CREEK PUMP STATION 5 0 10,000,000 25,000,000
4400 512627485 2022-1026
SLA REPLACEMENT - COTTONWOODS CONNECTION 5 4 10,000,000 8,200,000
4400 512627486 R22-0574 SLA REPLACEMENT / COTTONWOODS CONNECTION PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 5 4 200,000
4400 2023-1112 Big Cottonwood WTP Bypass Channel Replacement 5 5 6,000,000
4400 2023-1148 Big Cottonwood WTP Interim Improvements 5 5 2,000,000
4400 2023-1056
Big Cottonwood WTP - Interim Sed Basin Improvements 5 4
2,000,000
4400 512627491 2023-1057 Big Cottonwood WTP Intake Screening 5 5 2,000,000
20,200,000$ 11,200,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 9,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 278,000,000$
10,150,000 31,500,000 5,180,000 - - - -
28,190,000 31,350,000 38,520,000 10,500,000 23,100,000 23,000,000 480,150,000
38,340,000$ 62,850,000$ 43,700,000$ 10,500,000$ 23,100,000$ 23,000,000$ 480,150,000$
CC51200 SC530019
4400 2021-1103 Emigration Pump Station Drain Field Assessment and Upgrade 5 5 120,000 250,000
4400 513416359 2016-0888 3900 South Pump Station 4 4 150,000 400,000 4,000,000
4400 513416377 2020-1089 3900 South Pump Station Phase 2 and Edwards Drive Pipe Improvements 5 0 5,000,000
4400 2020-1090 3900 South Pump Station Phase 3 - Supply and High Pressure Pipelines 5 0 6,000,000
4400 2020-1091 3900 South Pump Station Phase 4 - Pump Station Connections 5 0 1,500,000
4400 2015-0563 Oakhills Pump Station - MCC - VFD - Pump Upgrade 3 3 1,650,000
4400 513416379 2022-1098 Arlington Hills Pump Station full back up power 5 5 700,000 50,000
4400 2016-1179 300 East Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 700,000
4400 2016-1180 3300 South Booster Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1181 Kenton Drive Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1183 Virginia and Millcreek Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1184 Eastwood Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1185 Millcreek Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1186 39th and Birch Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1187 Canyon Cove Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1188 7800 South Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1190 Carrigan Cove Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1173 North Bench Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1175 University Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1176 Research Park Pump Station Backup Power 5 4 500,000 5,000,000
4400 2016-1177 Oak Hills Pump Station Backup Power 5 4 2,000,000
4400 2016-1178 Bonneville Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1191 3900 South Booster Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 400,000
4400 2016-1192 6200 South Irrigation Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 500,000
4400 2016-1193 Emigration Pump Station Backup Power 3 3 300,000
4400 2016-1224 Arlington Hills Pump Station VFD's 3 3 200,000
4400 2016-1225 North Bench Pump Station VFD's 3 3 200,000
4400 2017-2009 Repair and Line of University Drain Line 2 3 20,000
4400 2015-0517 4500 South Pump Station Black Top 2 4 200,000
4400 2015-0522 Recurring Pump Station Repair Fund (Annual) 3 0 200,000
4400 2015-0169 UV Upgrade 6200 South Pump Station 1 2 300,000
4400 2016-1194 Ensign Downs Pump Station Backup Power 3 0 400,000
4400 2015-0172 MP 3.8C - Victory Road - Ensign Downs Phase II - Property Purchase 4 0 525,000
4400 2015-0173 4500 South Pump Station (Back Up) 5 0 1,500,000
4400 2022-1032 University Pump Station Piping Replacement and Equipment Upgrade 5 5 200,000
4400 2015-0665 Upgrades to Underground Pump Stations 4 4 240,000
4400 2016-0957 Morris Pump Station 3 0 600,000
900,000$ 320,000$ 250,000$ 5,000,000$ 6,000,000$ 1,425,000$ 24,710,000$
CC51200 SC530513
4400 512900273 2016-0737 IRRIGATION SCADA IMPROVEMENTS 5 5 60,000
4400 2016-0816 Rockhouse Dump - Intake Improvement 5 3 200,000
4400 513000034 2016-0858 Flume from Double barrels to Railroad tracks 4 5 2,200,000
4400 2023-1150 Flume from Double Barrels to Railroad Tracks, Phase 2 4 5 1,500,000
4400 5129246 R19-0029 Replace Flume/Auto Dump and JSL Canal Enclosure at Millcreek 4 5 2,000,000 700,000
4400 2015-0604 JSL 3800 S Rehab Floor and Leakage 3 4 100,000
4400 2015-0151 JSL Enclosure from 1300 East to Millcreek 3 3 1,000,000
4400 2015-0606 JSL 4500 South to Osage Orange Drive – Canal Bank Hydraulics 3 3 20,000
4400 2015-0149 New Irrigation Conduit on Harvard Avenue 4 0 600,000
4400 2016-1165 Low Flow Channel at Spencers Pond (Big cottonwood Creek) 4 0 300,000
4400 2015-0602 JSL Canal – Modify Big Spill to Handle Temporary Pump 2 2 1,100,000
4400 2016-1287 Wells at Walker Lane and Fountain Beau 1 3 500,000
4400 2016-0749 J&SL Diversion Structure at 2700 South 2 0 2,000,000
4400 2016-1286 3000 East Well for Water Deliveries 2 0 1,000,000
4400 2015-0153 Piping Ditch on JSL, Osage Orange Avenue to Lincoln Lane 1 0 500,000
4400 2018-1019 14600 S Canal Over Flow Structure 3 3 1,000,000
4400 2018-1082 Little Tanner Pipe Project 2 0 100,000
4400 2015-0151 JSL Enclosure from 1300 East to Millcreek 3 3 1,000,000
4400 2022-1194 Jordan and Salt Lake Canal - Copperview Well Improvements 4 4 70,000
4400 2022-1196 Big Cottonwood Flume Rehabilitation 5 4 250,000
4400 2019-1013 Rehabilitation/Replacement of the JSL in the City Limits (Annual) 5 4 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
4400 2019-1026 Cottage Ave Bank Property 5 4 140,000
4400 2022-1195 Jordan and Salt Lake Canal - Access at 700 East 5 0 350,000
4400 2022-1234 Red Butte Creek, Flow Measurement for Irrigation 5 0 500,000
4400 2022-1233 6200 South Lift Station - Auto-trashrack Refurbishment 5 5 70,000
4400 2022-1191 J&SL - Culvert at Downstream of Highland Drive (Polo Club) 5 3 200,000
4400 2018-1020 Lift Station on Big Cottonwood Creek 3 3 100,000
4400 2016-0755 Little Cottonwood Creek Flume 5 5 250,000
4,200,000$ 2,550,000$ 240,000$ 100,000$ 170,000$ 100,000$ 10,950,000$
CC51200 SC530514
4400 513223431 2020-1092 Brinton Springs Well Improvements 4 4 500,000
4400 51322336 2015-0171 Well Treatment Project - 1500 East Well 5 4 100,000
4400 2019-1185 Edgewood Well Improvements 4 4 400,000
4400 2023-1176 Well Assessment and Upgrades (Annual) 5 5 250,000 250,000 500,000
4400 2023-1177 Well Building Structure Upgrades (Annual) 5 5 250,000 250,000 500,000
4400 513600115 2020-1088 Focused Well Siting Study 2 0 300,000
4400 2016-0820 Dyers Inn - Electrical Upgrades 4 4 550,000
4400 2017-2071 Dyer's Inn Well Flush Line 4 4 100,000
4400 2016-0911 1300 E Well Chlorination 3 4 400,000
4400 2015-0565 19th and 27th South Well - VFD 3 0 60,000
4400 2015-0570 Treatment of PCE at Wells 3 0 10,000,000
4400 2015-0569 Red Butte 2 0 2,500,000
4400 2018-1091 Van Winkle property Fence 1 5 20,000
4400 2022-1095 Walker Lane Well House Repair 5 5 12,500
4400 2020-1110 Fontaine Well Improvements 4 4 455,000
4400 2020-1100 Diagonal Well Improvements 4 4 350,000
4400 2020-1101 Ellison Well Improvements 4 4 450,000
4400 2016-1234 Shed at Emigration Well 5 4 40,000
4400 2019-1031 Royal Vault Well Connections 2 3 100,000
4400 513223435 2023-1101 Artesian 1 Well Project 5 5 800,000
4400 513223434 2023-1044 Millcreek/Evergreen Well Pump Repair 5 5 900,000
4400 2020-1111 Dyer's Inn Well Improvements 4 4 2,500,000
4400 513223437 2024-1022 Advanced Treatment for Wells 5 5 300,000 2,500,000
100,000$ 2,000,000$ 2,500,000$ -$ 500,000$ 500,000$ 19,737,500$
CC51200 SC530016
4400 512700031 2015-0209 Mountain Dell Dam - Rebuilding of Outlet Gates and Pipes 4 4 5,100,000
4400 512700015 2018-1106 Mountain Dell Dam Spillway Rehabilitation 5 4 70,000 700,000
4400 512700041 2022-1114 Mountain Dell Dam Rehabilitation - Revegetation 5 5 250,000
4400 512700023 2023-1169 Mountain Dell Dam Rehabilitation - Revegetation of Disturbed Areas. 5 5 60,000
4400 512700043 2022-1123 Mountain Dell Dam Rehabilitation - Piping of Drains 5 0 100,000
4400 2023-1170 Mountain Dell Dam Rehabilitation - Piping of Drains - Phase 2 5 5 250,000
4400 512700042 2022-1124 Mountain Dell Dam - New Staff Gauge 5 0 100,000 100,000
4400 512700045 2022-1125 Mountain Dell Dam - Concrete repairs 5 4 250,000 250,000 1,000,000
4400 512700044 2022-1127 Mountain Dell Dam - New Boat ramp 4 5 70,000 70,000 200,000
4400 512700046 2019-1130 PARLEYS BOAT HOUSE REBUILD 5 5 100,000 500,000
6,040,000$ 320,000$ 900,000$ 250,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$ 160,000$
2023-1171 Little Dell Dam - Restore Exterior Pipe Coating 4 4 50,000 500,000
4400 2020-1008 Little Dell Penstock Winterization 4 4 250,000
4400 2018-1108 Little Dell Dam Staff Gauge 3 0 250,000
4400 2022-1145 Little Dell Dam - Diversion/Penstock Flowmeter 5 5 30,000
4400 2022-1154 Little Dell Dam - Instrumentation Upgrade 5 5 350,000
4400 2022-1163 Little Dell Dam - Control and Monitoring Panels 5 5 300,000
4400 2022-1153 Little Dell Dam - DOCS and Audit Lighting Rehabilitation 5 4 100,000
4400 2022-1219 LITTLE DELL DAM - NEW ENTRANCE SECURITY GATE 5 3 175,000
4400 2022-1142 Little Dell Dam - Restoration of DOCS Pipe Coating 5 4 100,000 1,000,000
4400 512700047 2022-1143 Storage Reservoirs - Control Panel Replacement 5 5 400,000
4400 2022-1229 Little Dell Dam - Security Camera Improvements 5 4 50,000
400,000$ 30,000$ 100,000$ 1,050,000$ 600,000$ -$ 1,375,000$
4400 2015-0156 PARLEY'S CANYON HYDROPOWER PROJECT 1 0 1,300,000
4400 2018-1034 SPILL PROTECTION PROJECT - I-80 AT LAMB'S CANYON 5 0 300,000
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,600,000$
4400 2022-1168 RED PINE DAM REHABILITATION 5 4 5,000,000
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000,000$
4400 2018-1109 Cecret Lake Flow Meter and Telemetry 4 0 60,000
4400 2022-1166 Cecret Dam - outlet channel gauge rehabilitation 5 4 40,000
4400 2022-1165 Cecret Dam - outlet rehabilitation 5 4 40,000
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 140,000$
4400 512700038 2022-1156 Lake Mary Dam - Rehabilitation 5 4 500,000 10,000,000
-$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000,000$
4400 512700036 2022-1062 TWIN LAKES DAM - GATE REPAIRS 5 5 250,000
4400 2022-1162 Twin Lakes Dam - Concrete study 5 3 100,000
250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$
4400 2022-1164 Red Butte Dam - Control Panels 5 5 225,000
-$ 225,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
6,690,000$ 1,075,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,300,000$ 1,100,000$ 1,000,000$ 18,375,000$
CC51200 SC530014
4400 513444164 2017-2067 Marcus Reservoir Tank Upgrades 5 5 1,000,000
4400 2023-1160 AM - Tank and Reservoir Inspections and Repairs (Annual) 5 5 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
4400 2015-0406 Emigration Tunnel Power 4 4 100,000
4400 513444168 2017-2111 Tanner Reservoir Full Replacement 4 4 4,500,000
4400 2022-1242 Distribution Tank and Reservoir Paving (Annual) 4 4 500,000
4400 513444180 2016-0753 BASKIN OVERFLOW/DRAIN GOOSENECK BOX 4 4 120,000
4400 513444184 2017-2061 Teton Tanks Slope Stabilization 4 3 350,000
4400 513444174 2015-0525 Perry Hollow Tank - Accessibility and other Improvements 2 5 750,000
4400 2015-0459 Tank Painting and Corrosion Control (Annual) 3 3 1,000,000
4400 2016-0935 Ensign Downs Overflow 3 3 150,000
4400 2015-0516 Mount Olympus Tanks & Pump Station Blacktop 2 4 100,000
4400 2015-0499 Rainer Tank 2 2 280,000
4400 2016-0917 Ensign Downs Lower Reservoir Modifications 2 2 200,000
4400 2015-0520 North Bench Tank Road 1 3 550,000
4400 2015-0526 Victory Road 1 3 100,000
4400 2016-0754 Capitol Hills Tanks - Truck Access 3 0 200,000
4400 2015-0529 Emigration Tank Upgrades 1 2 100,000
4400 2015-0530 Teton Tank Site Upgrades 3 4 500,000
4400 2015-0458 Miscellaneous Repairs 3 2 100,000
4400 513444185 2017-2010 Cove tank stabilization project 2 3 200,000
4400 2017-2064 Carrigan Cove Tank Power 2 3 50,000
4400 2017-2112 Granite Oaks/Telford Reservoir Repairs 3 3 50,000
4400 513444181 2018-1023 BASKIN RESERVOIR EFFLUENT PIPE 4 4 500,000
4400 2018-1033 Military Reservoir Condition Assessment 5 4 650,000
4400 2022-1244 Neff's Tank Condition Assessment 5 5 200,000 2,200,000
4400 513444182 2021-1063 15th East Reservoir roof repairs 5 5 1,500,000
4400 513444183 2021-1096 Park Reservoir Joint Waterproofing 5 5 350,000
4400 513444189 2021-1104 Canyon Cove Upper Tank East Hillside Slope Upgrade 5 5 50,000 250,000
4400 513444188 2021-1108 Capitol Hills Tanks Basin Drain Upgrade 5 5 400,000
4400 2021-1006 Neff's Tank Safety and Access Improvements 4 4 300,000
4400 2021-1007 Neff's Tank Interior and Exterior Surface Improvements 4 4 100,000
4400 2020-1065 Rehabilitation or Replacement of City and Morris Lines from CCWTP 1 4 10,000,000
4400 2022-1025 Morris Reservoir Access Improvements 3 4 115,000
4400 2020-1095 Teton North - Interior Recoat and Exterior Improvements 2 4 300,000
4400 2020-1050 Ferguson Coating and Upgrades 2 4 400,000
4400 2019-1024 Teton South - Interior Recoat and Exterior Improvements 1 4 250,000
4400 2019-1030 Marcus Reservoir Seismic Improvements 5 4 500,000
4400 2019-1016 SLAQ Tanner Connection Access Road Improvements 2 0 200,000
4400 2019-1084 North Bench Interior Recoating 4 4 2,000,000
4400 2019-1020 Capitol Hills South - Seismic Study 3 3 100,000
4400 2019-1021 Eastwood South - Interior Coating and Exterior Improvements 1 4 300,000
4400 2019-1023 Mount Olympus East - Seismic Retrofit Evaluation 1 2 20,000
4400 2019-1083 Canyon Cover Upper Interior Recoating 4 4 300,000
4400 2019-1022 Eastwood South - Exterior Coating 1 2 500,000
4400 2019-1029 Marcus Reservoir Tank Upgrades 3 4 50,000
4400 2019-1019 Capitol Hills South - Interior Coating and Exterior Improvements 3 3 250,000
4400 2020-1026 Teton North Structural Assessment 4 4 150,000 1,000,000
4400 2020-1004 1500 East Structural Evaluation 3 3 100,000
4400 2023-1063 Neffs Tank Rebuild 5 5 3,100,000
4400 2023-1151 Marcus Reservoir Replacement 5 4 5,000,000
4400 2017-2013 East Bench Tanks Drain Line Gooseneck 1 5 225,000
4400 2023-1157 Tanner Reservoir Valve Replacement 5 5 600,000
2,300,000$ 300,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 5,600,000$ 1,525,000$ 33,535,000$
CC51200 SC530013
4400 2023-1162 City/County/State Driven Projects (Annual) 5 5 250,000 100,000 1,000,000
4400 2023-1163 Roadway Bond Waterline Contingency (Annual) 5 5 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
4400 513600120 2022-1245 Sanitary Survey Deficiencies (Triennial) 5 5 400,000
4400 2024-1001 Sanitary Survey Deficiencies (Annual) 5 5 400,000 400,000
4400 513505603 2022-1246 W Temple - North Temple to 400 South 4 4 800,000
4400 513505602 2022-1247 Virginia Street - South Temple to 11th Ave 5 5 300,000
4400 513505578 2022-1250 2100 SOUTH - 700 EAST TO 1700 EAST 4 4 1,800,000
4400 2021-1003 Hope Avenue Water Main 300 W to 400 W 4 4 400,000
4400 513505567 2022-1130 969 Shirecliff Road Water Main 4 5 100,000
4400 2021-1089 Olympus Splendor Water Line Replacement 3 4 3,500,000
4400 2022-1086 Little Cottonwood Conduit Inspection 5 4 400,000
4400 2022-1068 Big Cottonwood Conduit Inspection 5 4 400,000
4400 2019-1142 Harris Ave Water - Main to 25 South 1 0 250,000
4400 2019-1077 Chase Avenue Water Main Replacement 3 5 110,000
4400 2016-0817 ARV to code - Vent to Atmosphere 5 5 250,000
4400 2021-1041 City Creek Canyon Fire Protection and Utilities Improvements 4 0 28,000,000
4400 2020-1019 Crestview Drive Water Main Replacement 4 3 700,000
4400 2021-1038 Replacement of Parleys Canyon Conduit 5 3 2,500,000
4400 2020-1113 State Street - 1700 S to 400 S Water Main Replacement 4 4 12,000,000
4400 2020-1114 State St - 1700 S. to 2100 S. Water Main Replacement 2 4 4,000,000
4400 2020-1112 SR-186 (400 S) - State Street to 1300 E Water Main Replacement 4 4 9,000,000
4400 2023-1016 Laird Ave water main from 1100 E to 1300 E 1 3 250,000
4400 2023-1129 600 N Water Main Replacement - Ramber Drive to Oakley Street 1 4 950,000
4400 2023-1109 Park Street Water Line Replacement 1 3 500,000
4400 2023-1108 Princeton Ave Water Line Replacement 1 3 1,100,000
3,600,000$ 150,000$ 50,000$ 450,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 65,810,000$
4400 2022-1245 FY23/24 TASK 1 PROGRAM MANAGMENT SERVICES (JACOBS) 400,000
4400 2023-1172 TASK 1 PROGRAM MANAGMENT SERVICES (JACOBS) 293,000 160,000
4400 2023-1015 Water Distribution Capital Project Support (Annual) 5 5 300,000
4400 2022-1251 FY 23/24 EMERGENCY REPAIRS (Annual) 5 5 500,000
4400 2023-1164 Emergency Repairs (Annual) 5 5 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
4400 2023-1163 Roadway Bond Waterline Contingency (Annual) 5 5 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
4400 2024-1002 REGULATOR REPLACEMENT (Annual) 5 5 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
4400 2024-1003 NEW MAINLINE VALVES - COUNTY (Annual) 5 5 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
4400 2022-1255 NEW WATER LINES - CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS (Annual) 5 5 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
4400 2022-1256 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENTS (Annual) 5 5 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
4400 2022-1254 NEW MAINLINE VALVES - CITY 5 5 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
4400 513900131 2019-1047 Marcus Reservoir Meter and Service Tap to JVWCD 5 0 80,000
4400 2016-0958 10th and B PRV 3 4 225,000
4400 2016-0751 Reconnection of 1700 South and Foothill Utilities 2 4 100,000
4400 513505407 2020-1031 UPPER CONDUIT REPAIR DESIGN 4 5 100,000
4400 513505599 2022-1257 UPPER CONDUIT REPAIR CONSTRUCTION - PHASE 3 4 5 3,500,000
4400 2023-1165 Upper Conduit Repair Construction - Phase 4 5 5 2,500,000
4400 2023-1166 Upper Conduit Repair Construction - Phase 5 5 5 3,500,000 4,200,000 5,700,000 9,000,000
4400 2016-0923 Sam Park Inlet Vault 3 3 100,000
4400 2016-0959 10th and E PRV 3 3 210,000
4400 2016-0960 8th and L PRV 3 3 210,000
4400 2016-0914 Connections at RR 4 0 440,000
4400 2020-1071 Cathodic Retrofitting Project (Annual) 5 5 500,000
4400 514500023 2021-1049 C12-R15 PRV Replacement 5 4 100,000
4400 2020-1003 Transmission Line Valve Replacement Along 500 S 4 4 270,000
4400 513800048 2021-1062 BCC Connection to LCC Valve Replacement Project 5 4 50,000 850,000
4400 513800045 2022-1134 Big Cottonwood Conduit Isolation Upgrades 5 0 50,000 175,000 1,500,000
4400 2020-1072 PRV Inspection Program (Annual) 5 5 250,000
4400 2018-1090 Metering Water Sources 1 0 1,000,000
4400 2017-1308 Installation of New Snow Gauging Stations 4 0 60,000
5,330,000$ 5,418,000$ 1,660,000$ 6,500,000$ 5,700,000$ 7,200,000$ 12,465,000$
4400 2022-1258 Water Main Replacements (Annual) 4 4 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000
4400 2024-1004 900 East and 5600 South Water Main Replacement 5 5 250,000 5,000,000
4400 2015-0624 1700 South - 1000 East to 1100 East 4 5 160,000
4400 2016-1230 17th and Foothill Telemetry and Power 4 5 200,000
4400 2015-0253 Pleasant Valley Line 4 5 653,000
4400 2015-0254 City Creek Highline 4 5 460,000
4400 2015-0237 Gregson Avenue - 2465 East to 2700 East 4 4 80,000
4400 2015-0260 West Temple - 500 South to 800 South (East Side) 4 4 469,000
4400 2017-2022 2880 South Water Main Replacement 4 4 500,000
4400 2015-0236 800 South - 1200 East to 1220 East 3 5 134,000
4400 2015-0613 Oak Creek Drive - 8200 South to End of Line 3 5 300,000
4400 513302045 2015-0616 Mardonna Way (3545 S) - Suniland Drive to Millstream Drive - Water Main 3 5 153,000
4400 2015-0620 Wilton Way Water Main Replacement 3 5 374,000
4400 2015-0621 1700 South - Foothill to Wasatch Water Main Replacements 3 5 257,000
4400 2015-0622 Milton Avenue (1595 South) - 1100 East to 1200 East 3 5 179,000
4400 2017-2066 2700 E Dead-end Connection 3 5 100,000
4400 2016-0738 Relocate 12" CIP Main from Under House (East Bench suction line) 5 2 255,000
4400 2015-0239 Cobblecrest Rd - 6380 S to 2300 E; Haun Ave - 2300 E to Cobblecrest 4 3 411,000
4400 2015-0232 North Temple - 1800 West to Redwood Road 4 3 156,200
4400 2015-0241 Westminster Avenue - Laurelhurst (2550 East) to Foothill Boulevard (2600 East) 4 3 90,000
4400 2015-0258 Biscayne Dr (2975 E) - Bengal Blvd to Oakview Cir 4 3 158,000
4400 2015-0550 Dupont Ave (1335 N) - American Beauty Dr to 990 W 4 3 115,000
4400 2016-1228 Replace PRV's - R11 and R12 4 3 400,000
4400 2015-0249 Scott Avenue - 700 East to Scott Park Lane 3 4 105,000
4400 2015-0400 R37 Maywood Regulator 3 4 650,000
4400 2015-0625 Bryan Avenue (1565 South) - 900 East to 1000 East 3 4 172,000
4400 2016-0889 CR1 PRV 5 5 1,000,000
4400 2016-0890 CR2 PRV 5 5 1,000,000
4400 2016-0891 Hydrant 3300 South 750 East E3-5H 3 4 40,000
4400 2016-0901 PRV E3-R49 Replacement 5 5 650,000
4400 2016-0910 Highland Drive Regulators 3 4 1,300,000
4400 2016-0912 R73 Replacement 3 4 200,000
4400 2016-0913 CUP Regulators 3 4 300,000
4400 2016-0918 2300 East - Clabourne to 3300 South 3 4 200,000
4400 2016-0934 PRV at 17th 3 4 210,000
4400 2016-1169 J Street Pipeline and PRV Replacement 3 4 300,000
4400 2016-1273 New Water Main - 1000 East 3 4 300,000
4400 2017-2062 Roxbury PRV C46-R66 3 4 150,000
4400 2017-2065 Camille St. Dead-end Connection 3 4 20,000
4400 2016-1283 Suicide Rock Runaround 2 5 25,000
4400 2015-0619 Buccaneer Drive Water Main Replacement 3 3 151,000
4400 2016-0748 Water Valve Replacement Project No. 3 2 4 100,000
4400 2015-0242 700 East - Driggs Ave (2370 S) to Warnock Ave (2470 S) 1 5 257,000
4400 2015-0256 900 East Hillview (4060 South) - Replace DIP Main Under Sewer 1 5 36,000
4400 2016-0756 300 West - 700 S to 800 S 1 5 175,000
4400 2016-0892 Kearns Line Replacement 5 5 175,000 800,000 15,000,000
4400 2016-0900 R48 Valve 3 3 220,000
4400 2016-0906 6-inch on 9th 3 3 450,000
4400 2016-0915 Smiths Connection 3 3 70,000
4400 2016-0916 Country Club PRV 3 3 250,000
4400 2016-0933 Maywood 6-inch 3 3 220,000
4400 2016-0936 16-inch Valve Vault 3 3 65,000
4400 2016-1222 PRV Replacement - A8-14 3 3 200,000
4400 2016-1231 New PRV - R73 3 3 200,000
4400 2016-1232 New PRV - R74 3 3 200,000
4400 2016-1235 Power at Emigration Tunnel 3 3 100,000
4400 2015-0399 Research Park Upgrade 5 0 410,000
4400 2016-0919 Inserta Valves 5 0 50,000
4400 2017-1299 Edward Drive Regulated Improvements 5 0 500,000
4400 2017-2068 Indian Rock Pressure Zone Redundant Feed 5 0 250,000
4400 2017-2070 Highland Dr Water Main - 6200 S to Diamond Hills Ln 3 2 250,000
4400 513302046 2015-0615 Suniland Drive (3550 E) - Millstream Lane to End of Suniland Circle - Water Main 3 2 149,000
4400 2015-0426 Fort Union and Highland Ave Intersection 2 3 302,500
4400 2017-2011 900 East from Van Winkle to 5600 South 2 3 100,000
4400 2015-0248 500 South - 2130 West to Orange Street 4 0 315,000
4400 2015-0250 6200 South - 2900 East to 3000 East 4 0 350,000
4400 2015-0544 Short Hills Dr (3375 E) - 8220 South to 8315 South 4 0 55,000
4400 2016-0925 2700 E Connection 2 2 60,000
4400 2015-0480 1700 East from Ft Union Blvd (6935 S) to 7080 South 1 3 360,000
4400 2015-0548 3900 South - 900 East to 940 East 3 0 130,000
4400 2015-0586 Parley's Canyon Blvd 1700 East to 1800 East 3 0 181,000
4400 2015-0626 400 East - 1497 South to 1530 South 3 0 37,000
4400 2015-0627 1400 East - Gilmer Avenue to Yale Avenue 3 0 32,000
4400 2016-1168 Kearns Valve 3 0 30,000
4400 2015-0413 700 North 8" AC 2 1 115,000
4400 2015-0641 Little Cottonwood Creek Cement Cap 4" 1 2 35,000
4400 2015-0407 2200 West Water Main Extension 1 0 255,000
4400 513505450 2019-1182 South Temple Water Main - 1000 W to Jordan River 5 5 90,000 1,100,000
4400 2018-1096 Cheyenne Street Water Line Replacement 5 5 600,000
4400 2016-0856 7000 South Sand Trap and Screen Removal 5 5 50,000
4400 2018-1041 Upper Boundary Springs Effluent Line Replacement from Spring Box to Tank 4 5 500,000
4400 2019-1132 East Place Water Main Replacement 4 5 100,000
4400 2019-1125 Olympus Drive Water Main Replacement 5 5 2,100,000
4400 513505472 2021-1027 1000 N Water Main Replacement 5 5 500,000
4400 2022-1003 11th Ave Waterline Replacement 5 5 3,800,000
4400 513505601 2022-1069 Bonneville Blvd Water Pipe Liner Project 5 5 600,000
4400 2021-1089 Olympus Splendor Water Line Replacement 5 5 3,500,000
4400 2021-1032 Hope Avenue 300 to 400 West 3 4 275,000
4400 2020-1087 3300 S Water Main And Transmission Replacement - Highland Dr to I-215 4 4 15,000,000
4400 2022-1193 Midland Street-Riverview Avenue Water Line Replacement 2 3 1,500,000
4400 2023-1069 West Temple Water Main Improvements 4 5 3,000,000
4400 2023-1074 700 East Water Main Replacements - 2100 South to 2700 South 5 5 8,100,000
4400 2023-1075 700 East Water Main Replacements - 2700 S to Springview Dr 5 5 3,650,000
4400 2023-1078 300 E Water Main Replacement - 600 S to 900 S 5 5 2,200,000
4400 2023-1079 2100 South Water Main Replacement - 900 W to 1045 W 5 5 1,100,000
4400 2024-1006 Beck Street Water Main Replacement - 900 N to 1720 N 5 5 5,700,000
4400 2024-1008 Parkview Dr Water Main Replacement - 3892 S to Park Terrace Dr 5 5 4,000,000
4400 2024-1009 Wasatch Blvd. Water Main Replacement - Warr Rd. to Rainier Ave. 5 5 825,000
4400 2024-1012 Heughs Canyon Neighborhood Water Main Replacement 5 5 6,750,000
4400 2024-1013 1300 South Water Main Replacement - Foothill Drive to Wasatch Drive 5 5 1,350,000
4400 2023-1167 R-3 PRV Replacement 4 5 750,000
4400 2023-1168 R-2 PRV Replacement 4 4 750,000
4400 2024-1010 R-50 PRV Replacement 5 5 650,000
4400 2024-1011 R-57 PRV Replacement 5 5 650,000
4400 2024-1032 24-inch Mokveld Valve Replacement at Suicide Rock 5 5 650,000
690,000$ 825,000$ 4,450,000$ 18,653,000$ 5,900,000$ 8,000,000$ 83,433,700$
CC51200 SC530012
4400 513416337 2015-0629 MP3.16 - North Bench Pump Station 5 5 3,500,000
4400 2015-0217 City Creek Treatment Line to Morris Reservoir 5 4 11,100,000
4400 513302020 2015-0230 3rd East Phase II - Marcus to Artesian Basin 4 4 2,500,000 10,000,000 15,000,000
4400 2015-0632 Wastewater Reuse 4 3 23,000,000
4400 2015-0633 Millcreek Treatment Plant Line - Tank to Wasatch Blvd (24") 4 3 750,000
4400 2015-0218 MP 3.5B - 16" Pipeline on Newport Way/Nantucket Drive 4 2 394,000
4400 2015-0224 MP 3.5A - 12" Pipeline on Highland Dr (6200 S High Zone) 3 3 317,000
4400 2015-0229 MP 3.17 - 8" Loop at 2200 West/2200 North 5 0 1,000,000
4400 2015-0219 MP3.9 - New Pump Station - Teton to Mt. Olympus/4500 South High - IF 4 0 695,000
4400 2015-0220 MP3.6B - 12" Pipeline on Brighton Way 4 0 200,000
4400 2015-0221 MP3.5C - 16" Pipeline on Bengal Boulevard 4 0 80,000 500,000 5,000,000
4400 2015-0231 MP 3.8C - Victory Road - Ensign Downs Phase II - IF 4 0 200,000 350,000 3,500,000
4400 513505600 2022-1169 MP3.1A - East-West Conveyance Line - Terminal Reservoir to 300 E 5 0 5,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000
4400 2015-0227 MP3.7 - Add Throttling Control Valve Into Wilson Reservoir 3 0 150,000
4400 2015-0538 MP 3.12A - 7800 South Pressure Zone - 4.3 MG Reservoir 2 0 3,000,000
4400 2015-0636 MP2.1 - Develop Additional Ground Water Sources 2 0 18,000,000
4400 2015-0630 MP2.2 - Additional Surface Water Development 2 0 12,000,000
4400 2022-1170 MP3.1B - East-West Conveyance Line - 300 E to 3200 W 5 0 31,000,000
4400 2015-0631 Millcreek Water Treatment Facility 1 0 80,000,000
4400 2023-1013 2026-2039 Groundwater Development 5 4 39,000,000
4400 2022-1119 Aquifer Storage and Recovery 4 4 21,000,000
4400 2015-0428 MP 3.12 B - 7800 South Auxiliary Power 3 3 305,000
4400 2020-1019 MP.T1 Crestview Drive Water Line Replacement 4 4 1,000,000
4000. 2024-1014 Update Water Distribution Master Plan 5 3 250,000
5,000,000$ 3,700,000$ 18,000,000$ 20,080,000$ 28,350,000$ 18,500,000$ 258,161,000$
14,620,000$ 10,093,000$ 24,160,000$ 45,683,000$ 40,000,000$ 33,750,000$ 419,869,700$
CC51102 SC530015
4000 SERVICE LINE REPAIR/REPLACEMENTS 5 5 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,800,000
4000 NEW SERVICE CONNECTIONS 5 5 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
4000 NEW SERVICE CONNECTIONS-DEVELOPERS 5 5 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000
4000 LARGE METER REPLACEMENTS 5 5 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
4000 METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 5 5 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
4000 AMI METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 1,600,000
4400 REVISED LEAD AND COPPER RULE COMPLIANCE 4 3 500,000
4400 2022-1152 Lead Service Replacement Program 5 5 1,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
5,950,000$ 6,450,000$ 7,950,000$ 7,950,000$ 7,950,000$ 7,950,000$ 1,600,000$
CC51200 SC530504
4400 Restore Two Sites
4400 2023-1012 City Creek Asphalt Renewal (Annual) 100,000
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$
31,500,000 5,180,000 - - - -
54,218,000 74,720,000 70,633,000 84,620,000 69,250,000 1,055,127,200
73,500,000$ 85,718,000$ 79,900,000$ 70,633,000$ 84,620,000$ 69,250,000$ 1,055,127,200$
CC51200 SC530204
4500 2019-1041 LIFT STATION STORAGE FACILITY 5 0 200,000 600,000
4500 2022-1226 SLCDPU Campus (Sewer) 5 5 350,000 8,000,000
4500 2021-1051 Collections WRF Receiving Pad 4 0 60,000 330,000 3,300,000
4500 West Camput Building Modifications/Upgrades 80,000
350,000$ 280,000$ 60,000$ 930,000$ -$ -$ 11,300,000$
CC51413 SC530021
4500 2019-1046 LIFT STATION SCOPING and ASSET MANAGEMENT PRIORITIZATION 2 1 500,000
4500 524907101 2017-1301 5300 WEST LIFT STATION (SS17) CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS 4 5 2,500,000
4500 2015-0264 SOUTH LIFT STATION (SS05)4 4 500,000
4500 2015-0270 WESTPOINTE LIFT STATION WET WELL IMPROVEMENTS (SS 33)2 2 550,000
4500 2017-2008 Billy Mitchell (SS16) Capacity Upgrades 4 5 250,000 2,000,000
4500 2020-1063 Amelia Earhart LS Rehab 3 3 550,000
4500 2020-1062 Concord LS Improvements 3 2 700,000
4500 2020-1060 California Place LS Improvements 3 3 339,900
4500 2020-1064 Morton Lift Station Rehabilitation 3 3 500,000
4500 2020-1061 West LS Improvements 3 2 300,000
4500 2020-1070 North LS (SS04) Rehabilitation 3 3 350,000
4500 2020-1078 600 N LS Rehab 3 3 350,000
4500 2020-1079 Nin Tech LS Rehabilitation 3 4 350,000
4500 2021-1024 500 S PS Biofilter Make-up Water 2 1 100,000
4500 2021-1136 Industrial LS Improvements 4 5 250,000 2,500,000
4500 2020-1191 500 S PS Programming & Integration 4 4 150,000
4500 2022-1103 1700 N Lift Station Flow Meter Installation 2 4 150,000
2,750,000$ 2,500,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 500,000$ 6,889,900$
CC51501 SC530222
4500 2016-1133 REHAB OF VERTICAL TURBINE PUMPS 4 4 200,000
4500 524905412 2022-1088 SLCWRF - Digester 4 Roof Rehabilitation 5 5 100,000
4500 2022-1001 SLCWRF - 5th Rotary Drum Thickener 5 0 2,100,000
4500 2023-1122 Capital Asset Rehabilitation and Upgrades (Annual)5 5 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 750,000
4500 2022-1201 Cogen Radiator 5 5 250,000
4500 2022-1211 Digester Plug Valves Replacement (Annual)4 4 110,000
4500 2023-1123 Trickling Filter Rehabilitation (Annual)5 5 150,000 150,000 150,000
4500 2023-1153 West Maintenance Remodel 2 2 250000
4500 2023-1152 East Maintenance Remodel 2 2 250000
4500 2023-1121 Demolition of Existing WRF 3 3 20,000,000
4500 2023-1154 New WRF Expansion, Phase 2 1 1 230,000,000
4500 2023-1155 New WRF Expansion, Phase 3 1 1 140,000,000
1,760,000$ 1,450,000$ 1,450,000$ 3,000,000$ -$ -$ 390,700,000$
4500 525400068 2017-2050 New WRF - Professional Design Services (Design Services - AECOM) 7,335,521 5,584,000 2,500,000 500,000
4500 524905411 2022-1030 FY 22/23 WRF Capital Project Support
4500 2022-1243 FY 23/24 WRF Capital Project Support 3,000,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 1,000,000
4500 524905337 2017-2052 New WRF - Water Renew Public Outreach (Public Engagement -WF&Co) 122,646
4500 524905362 2019-1054 New WRF - Visual Documentation Services for Construction (Project Documentation - MultiVista) 90,324 90,324 90,324 45,162
4500 524905368 2019-1131 Salt Lake City Water Reclamation Facility LEED Commissioning Agent
4500 524905271 2015-0505 New WRF - Core - Design Build Reclamation Facility (Construction - Based off BODR) 195,250,273 200,000,000 40,000,000
4500 Contingency 4,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 1,000,000
4500 Financing costs 701,009 701,009 525,000 846,603
212,259,773$ 214,575,333$ 50,315,324$ 6,391,765$ -$ -$ 390,700,000$
215,359,773$ 217,355,333$ 50,375,324$ 7,321,765$ 250,000$ 500,000$ 408,889,900$
CC51200 SC530011
4500 2020-1154 1200 WEST TRUNK LINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT/ PROJECT PRE-DESIGN 5 3 600,000 600,000
4500 2015-0664 SIPHON INSPECTION PROJECT 3 3 200,000 200,000
4500 2015-0645 COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT CAP SCOPING 2 2 300,000
4500 2020-1155 BECK STREET TRUNK LINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT/PRE-DESIGN 2 2 600,000
4500 2020-1156 ORANGE STREET TRUNK LINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT/PROJECT PRE-DESIGN 4 4 430,000
-$ -$ 200,000$ 1,030,000$ 600,000$ -$ 1,100,000$
4500 2015-0652 EAST SIDE INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY 3 4 300,000
4500 2015-0651 ANNUAL HYDRAULIC MODEL CALIBRATION 4 3
150,000
4500 2017-2078 VARIOUS BASIN INFLOW TESTING 4 4 250,000
4500 2018-1029 BASIN 11 I&I 3 4 250,000
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 950,000$
4500 2022-1227 MISC. PUBLIC SERVICES PROJECTS (ANNUAL)5 5 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
4500 525003054 2019-1126 500 SOUTH FM DISCHARGE BIOTOWER 5 0 2,500,000
4500 2019-1127 ORANGE STREET LOCATION 4 BIOTOWER 2 0 2,840,000
4500 2021-1082 ORANGE STREET LOCATION 5 BIOTOWER 2 0 2,640,000
4500 2020-1053 SLCo Surplus Inspection Reporting 5 3 250,000
4500 2020-1169 SLCo Surplus Canal Certification Project 5 4 4,000,000
4500 2021-1132 Downtown Local Area Study 3 4 250,000
4500 2021-1002 700 North Sewer Rehabilitation 4 5 200,000 5,500,000
400,000$ 8,200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 10,180,000$
4500 2015-0486 1% PER YEAR SEWER REHABILITATION/SYSTEM RENEWAL 5 5 3,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 8,400,000
4500 2015-0722 Phase 1 - Beck Sewer Trunk Line Rehabilitation 5 4 10,000,000
4500 2016-0897 1200 W Trunk Line Rehabilitation - West Temple 5 5 8,000,000
4500 2021-1084 1200 W Trunk Line Rehabilitation - 1300 S 5 4 6,000,000
4500 2016-0902 800 S AND 1100 E LATERAL CONNECTIONS AND UPSTREAM INFILTRATION 3 4 350,000
4500 2015-0727 300 W - 550 S TO 600 S 3 3 250,000
4500 2016-0895 ELGIN AVE SEWER REPLACEMENT 3 4 50,000 350,000
4500 2015-0318 700 SOUTH - 3750 WEST TO IRON ROSE PLACE (3830 W)4 4 650,000
4500 525002851 R18-0027 1200 WEST TRUNK LINE REHABILITATION PROJECT 5 5 32,000,000
4500 525003010 2020-1009 BECK STREET TRUNK LINE REHABILITATION PROJECT 5 5 10,000,000 20,000,000
4500 2016-1240 CIPP SEWER ON MCCLELLAND ST AT CRANDAL AVE 3 5 35,000
4500 2015-0683 8TH AVE - FROM M ST TO L ST 3 4 22,000
4500 2016-0963 North Bonneville Dr Sewer Rehab 3 4 25,000
4500 2016-0972 CIPP SEWER VIRGINIA ST FROM MH 22062 TO POPPERTON WAY 3 4 25,000
4500 525002972 2016-0975 CIPP SEWER IN INTERNATIONAL CENTER ON NEIL ARMSTRONG ROAD 3 5 115,000
4500 2016-0976 CIPP SEWER ON DONNER WAY AND DONNER CIRCLE 3 4 20,000
4500 2016-0978 CIPP SEWER ON OAK HILLS WAY 3 4 66,000
4500 2016-0984 CIPP SEWER ON WILTON WAY TO SHERWOOD DR 3 4 110,000
4500 2016-0996 CIPP SEWER 1700 SOUTH AND FOOTHILL DR 3 4 85,000
4500 2016-1025 CIPP SEWER 1700 SOUTH 2100 EAST 3 4 50,000
4500 2016-1029 CIPP SEWER ON 1100 EAST FROM MICHIGAN AVE TO HERBERT AVE 3 5 90,000
4500 2016-1034 CIPP SEWER ON WHITLOCK AVE FROM HIGHLAND DR TO DOUGLAS ST 3 4 40,000
4500 2016-1037 CIPP SEWER ON HOLLYWOOD AVE BETWEEN 1800 EAST AND 1900 EAST 3 3 55,000
4500 2016-1043 CIPP SEWER ON 200 EAST AND 100 SOUTH 3 5 200,000
4500 2016-1046 CIPP SEWER ON 100 SOUTH STATE STREET 3 5 250,000
4500 2016-1060 CIPP SEWER ON 800 EAST FROM SIMPSON AVE TO WILMINGTON AVE 3 5 200,000
4500 2016-1061 CIPP SEWER ON THIRD AVE FROM O ST TO P ST 3 4 70,000
4500 2016-1074 CIPP SEWER ON SOUTH TEMPLE FROM P ST TO Q ST 3 5 900,000
4500 2016-1076 CIPP SEWER ON 900 EAST FROM SOUTH TEMPLE TO 100 SOUTH 3 4 40,000
4500 2016-1079 CIPP SEWER ON 200 SOUTH 1300 EAST TO UNIVERSITY 3 4 40,000
4500 2016-1082 CIPP SEWER ON LINDEN AVE AND 1000 EAST 3 5 40,000
4500 2016-1083 CIPP SEWER ON 900 EAST BETWEEN 300 SOUTH AND 400 SOUTH 3 4 400,000
4500 2016-1084 CIPP SEWER ON GILMER DR 3 4 80,000
4500 2016-1085 CIPP SEWER ON 1900 EAST FROM HERBERT AVE TO YALE AVE 3 5 60,000
4500 2016-1088 CIPP SEWER ON FAYETTE AVE AND WEST TEMPLE 3 5 50,000
4500 2016-1109 CIPP SEWER ON ELY PL AND 700 EAST 3 5 90,000
4500 2016-1010 CIPP SEWER ON 1000 EAST FROM SOUTH TEMPLE TO 100 SOUTH 3 4 55,000
4500 2016-1111 CIPP SEWER ON 200 EAST FROM 250 SOUTH TO 300 SOUTH 3 5 200,000
4500 2016-1115 CIPP SEWER ON 200 NORTH BETWEEN WEST TEMPLE AND ALMOND ST 3 4 110,000
4500 2016-1122 CIPP SEWER ON EDGEHILL ROAD AND LITTLE VALLEY ROAD 3 5 35,000
4500 2016-1124 CIPP SEWER ON NORTHMONT WAY AND EIGHTEENTH AVE 3 5 60,000
4500 2016-1126 CIPP SEWER ON TERRACE HILLS DR BETWEEN NORTHCREST DR AND NORTH BONNEVILLE 3 5 90,000
4500 2016-1132 CIPP SEWER ON NINTH AVE BETWEEN K STREET AND L STREET 3 4 70,000
4500 2016-1140 CIPP SEWER ON DORCHESTER DR FROM BRAEWICK RD TO SANDRUN RD 3 5 70,000
4500 2016-1142 CIPP SEWER ON B STREET FROM SIXTH AVE TO SEVENTH AVE 3 5 300,000
4500 2016-1145 CIPP SEWER ON DONNER WAY FROM THACKERAY PL TO SHAKESPEARE PL 3 5 40,000
4500 2016-1152 CIPP SEWER ON KENSINGTON AVE AND BEACON DR 3 4 100,000
4500 2016-1153 CIPP SEWER ON CANTERBURY DR FROM LANCASTER DR TO WILTON WAY 3 5 70,000
4500 2016-1156 CIPP SEWER ON UTE DR FROM INDIAN HILL CIRCLE TO EAGLE WAY 3 5 60,000
4500 2016-1157 CIPP SEWER ON COMANCHE DR AND EAGLE WAY 3 5 15,000
4500 2016-1158 CIPP SEWER ON WASATCH DR BETWEEN 1700 SOUTH AND SKYLINE DR 3 5 150,000
4500 2016-1172 CIPP SEWER FROM 1911 SOUTH FOOTHILL TO 1975 SOUTH FOOTHILL 3 4 19,000
4500 2016-1198 CIPP SEWER ON BLAINE AVE AND TEXAS ST 3 5 90,000
4500 2016-1207 CIPP SEWER ON INDUSTRIAL AVE AND 1700 SOUTH 3 5 15,000
4500 2016-1209 CIPP SEWER ON 2300 EAST BETWEEN CLUBHOUSE DR AND MAYWOOD DR 3 5 30,000
4500 2016-1212 CIPP SEWER FROM 2526 EAST COMMONWEALTH TO WYOMING ST 3 5 35,000
4500 2016-1213 CIPP SEWER ON 2000 EAST BETWEEN WILSON AVE AND DOWNINGTOWN AVE 3 5 60,000
4500 2016-1214 CIPP SEWER FROM 1838 EAST DOWNINGTOWN AVE TO 1800 EAST 3 5 70,000
4500 2016-1215 CIPP SEWER ON 2100 EAST FROM WILSON AVE TO DOWNINGTOWN AVE 3 4 25,000
4500 2016-1229 CIPP SEWER ON GLENMARE ST BETWEEN STRATFORD AVE AND 2700 SOUTH 3 5 19,000
4500 2016-1241 CIPP SEWER ON HUDSON AVE BETWEEN HIGHLAND DRIVE AND 1400 EAST 3 5 100,000
4500 2016-1242 CIPP SEWER ON SYLVAN AVE BETWEEN 1900 EAST AND 2000 EAST 3 4 40,000
4500 2016-1245 CIPP SEWER ON THIRD AVE AT CANYON ROAD 3 5 80,000
4500 2016-1248 CIPP SEWER ON C STREET BETWEEN FIFTH AVE AND SIXTH AVE 3 5 180,000
4500 2016-1256 University Blvd (500 S) Sewer Rehab 3 4 70,000
4500 2016-0821 ELGIN AVE 1000 E - 950 E 2 4 250,000
4500 2016-0967 Cambridge Way Sewer Rehab 3 4 80,000
4500 2016-0974 CIPP SEWER ON 1500 WEST FROM TALISMAN DR TO 895 NORTH 3 4 100,000
4500 2016-0977 CIPP SEWER BONNEVILLE DR 3 3 70,000
4500 2016-0982 CIPP SEWER AT ST MARY'S WAY AND OQUIRRH DRIVE 3 4 110,000
4500 2016-1006 CIPP SEWER ON 4TH AVE FROM VIRGINIA ST TO U ST 3 5 55,000
4500 2016-1007 CIPP SEWER ON FORT DOUGLAS CIRCLE 3 5 30,000
4500 2016-1053 CIPP SEWER ON KRISTIANNA CIR AND VIRGINIA ST 3 5 120,000
4500 2016-1054 CIPP SEWER ON ROUNDTOFT DR TO EAST CAPITOL BLVD 3 5 80,000
4500 2016-1062 CIPP SEWER ON SECOND AVE FROM L STREET TO M STREET 3 5 40,000
4500 2016-1127 CIPP SEWER ON 550 EAST NORTHHILLS DR 3 5 100,000
4500 2016-0969 CIPP SEWER LINE ON 300 WEST FROM 400 NORTH TO BISHOP PL 3 4 25,000
4500 2016-1066 CIPP SEWER ON M STREET BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND AVE 3 5 260,000
4500 2016-0870 Easement North of Oquirrh Dr 3 4 $1,000,000
4500 2017-2021 800 South 1200 East 3 5 80,000
4500 2017-1302 LEARNED AVE 1034 TO 1000 WEST 3 5 100,000
4500 2017-2023 400 East 2100 - 1700 South 4 5 500,000
4500 2017-2036 350 West 600 South North Side 4 5 150,000
4500 2017-2037 1000 East Logan Ave 3 5 110,000
4500 2017-2038 700 to 800 West 300 North North Side 3 5 300,000
4500 2017-2041 420 South 700 West 2 5 50,000
4500 2017-2047 994 South Oak Hills 3 4 150,000
4500 2018-1001 190 East Social Hall 1 5 250,000
4500 2018-1008 CIPP on South Temple Between A and B Street 3 5 25,000
4500 2018-1009 Q Street Sewer Rehab 3 5 400,000
4500 2018-1010 CIPP on 3rd ave from C Street to E Street 2 5 90,000
4500 2018-1011 CIPP on 100 south from 750 - 800 West 2 5 75,000
4500 2018-1012 Spot Repair on Wasatch Drive at 1758 South 3 5 25,000
4500 2018-1021 Foothill Drive 1300-1000 South 4 5 200,000
4500 2018-1022 500 South, Main Street to State Street 1 2 40,000
4500 2018-1027 845 West 200 South 2 5 350,000
4500 2018-1039 900 East 100 - 200 South East Side 2 4 65,000
4500 2018-1042 100 South 800 - 700 East south side 3 4 65,000
4500 2018-1086 18th Ave 630 - 724 East 2 5 800,000
4500 2018-1087 Laird Ave 1300 - 1100 East 2 4 120,000
4500 2018-1097 CIPP State St and 500 S to 200 E and 100 S 4 4 2,000,000
4500 2018-1111 North Temple (from Main to West Temple) Capacity Project 4 4 600,000
4500 2019-1017 Downington Ave and 2500 East 3 3 60,000
4500 2019-1051 Harvard Ave - Major St to Main St 4 5 150,000
4500 2019-1058 CIPP on M Street 1st - 4th ave 3 4 500,000
4500 2019-1059 CIPP 800 West 500 to 600 North 3 5 500,000
4500 2019-1104 280 South 300 West 3 5 200,000
4500 2019-1139 Fulton Sewer Extension 1 0 680,000
4500 2019-1156 Pioneer Side Sewer Relocation 3 3 300,000
4500 2020-1045 900 E & Lowell Ave Main Extension 1 3 300,000
4500 2020-1175 Blanchard Pipe Rehab and Replacement 3 4 350,000
4500 2021-1012 Dupont Sewer Rehab 4 5 75,000
4500 2021-1001 200 E Sewer Rehabilitation 4 5 260,000
4500 2021-1005 West Temple 30-inch Sewer Rehab.4 4 5,100,000
4500 2021-1040 900 South 1300 East Sewer Line Rehab 3 4 105,000
4500 2021-1107 Stratford Ave Sewer Rehab 3 4 350,000
4500 2022-1013 Exchange Pl - Cactus St Rehab/Replacement 3 3 250,000
4500 2022-1022 800 S 300 E Sewer Rehab 3 5 60,000 600,000
4500 2022-1024 Atkin Ave Sewer Rehab 2 4 170,000
4500 2022-1066 Danone (1730 S) Sewer Rehab 3 5 900,000
4500 2022-1067 Pipe Replacement - Facility ID 24350 24349 3 3 300,000
4500 2022-1070 600 N Sewer Capacity Project 4 4 1,000,000
4500 2022-1071 400 N 316 W Sewer Rehab 1 5 60,000
4500 525003075 2022-1072 PS-2 Force Main Utility Locating Project 5 5 175,000
4500 2022-1073 2100 S Sewer Rehabilitation Project (600 E/400 E)5 4 700,000
4500 2022-1099 400 E 2100 South Sewer Line Repair 5 4 396,600
4500 2022-1096 4200 West North Temple 24-inch Sewer Project 2 3 1,000,000
4500 2022-1097 State Street - 400 S & 700 S Sewer Rehab 4 5 200,000
4500 2022-1131 4200 West North Temple Construction 5 5 1,000,000
4500 2022-1259 200 E & 300 S to 400 S Sewer Rehab 4 5 793,100
4500 2023-1002 Sewer Rehab 1090 South Harvard Ave 5 4 700,000
4500 2023-1006 1330 N Redwood Road 5 5 100,000
4500 2023-1037 CIPP 700 South 1000 East 3 4 60,000
4500 2023-1039 CIPP Windsor St 2 4 90,000
4500 2023-1040 Replace Sewer on McClelland Street 1 5 60,000
4500 2023-1076 Bonneville Golf Course Sewer Improvements 4 4 600,000
4500 2023-1077 CIPP 900-100 South 200 E Alley 3 5 110,000
4500 2023-1126 Emery Street Replacement and Upsize Phase 2 4 5 1,750,000
4500 2023-1127 CIPP Harvard Ave 300 East to Blair Stree 3 3 100,000
4500 2023-1128 CIPP Paramount Sewer Line 200 W to 300 W 3 4 100,000
4500 2022-1133 Emergent Operational Support Project(s) (Annual)5 4 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
4500 2021-1034 North Temple 1000 West Point Repair 2 4 65,000
4500 2021-1054 Grounding Rod Point Repair(s) 3 4 100,000
4500 2022-1005 800 W - Storm Sewer Obstruction 2 2 500,000
2,155,000$ 8,500,000$ 9,910,000$ 5,450,000$ 14,700,000$ 14,500,000$ 93,985,700$
4500 2020-1158 MAINTENANCE ACCESS REHAB PROGRAM (VARIOUS LOCATIONS) 5 5 1,000,000
4500 2021-1018 500 S Surplus Siphon Rehabilitation 4 4 750,000
4500 2021-1050 Facility ID 21309 Replacement 2 4 170,000
4500 2021-1081 700 S Maintenance Access Rehab 2 3 500,000
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,420,000$
4500 2015-0485 Emergencies - Contributions by Developers 5 5 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
4500 2021-1085 FY 23/24 Collection System Capital Project Support 4 4 800,000
4500 2022-1230 TASK 1 PROGRAM MANAGMENT SERVICES FY 23/24(Jacobs) 4 4 350,000
4500 2023-1133 TASK 1 PROGRAM MANAGMENT SERVICES FY 24/25(Jacobs) 4 4 293,000 120,000
1,650,000.00$ 793,000$ 620,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ 500,000.00$ -$
4500 2016-0950 MP13 - BECK STREET TRUNK REPLACEMENT FROM 500 SOUTH AND STATE STREET TO 700 SOU 5 3 20,000,000
4500 525002879 R19-0082 1800 North Sewer Realignment, Phase 2 - Trunk Sewer 5 5 1,500,000
4500 525002915 R19-0084 1800 North Sewer Realignment, Phase 3 - Rehabilitation 5 5 6,000,000 6,000,000
4500 525002631 2015-0280 ORANGE STREET - PHASE IV - INDIANA TO 1500 SOUTH 5 4 1,200,000 9,500,000
4500 2016-0929 MP16 - 600 WEST AND 700 SOUTH TO 500 WEST AND 800 SOUTH 5 5 2,500,000
4500 2016-0931 MP17B - MAIN STREET FROM 800 SOUTH TO 900 SOUTH 5 5 1,750,000
4500 2016-0940 MP19 - FOLSOM AVENUE FROM 500 WEST TO 1000 WEST 5 5 13,500,000
4500 2016-0941 MP20 - 700 WEST FROM 900 SOUTH TO 600 SOUTH 5 4 5,500,000
4500 2016-0942 MP21 - 100 SOUTH AND 300 WEST DIVERSION 5 4 360,000
4500 2015-0322 MP28 - NORTH TEMPLE - AIRPORT TO ORANGE STREET 4 4 8,000,000 8,250,000
4500 2016-0949 MP26 - SOUTH TEMPLE AND 400 WEST DIVERSION 4 4 250,000
4500 2016-0943 MP22 - PIONEER ROAD FROM CALIFORNIA AVENUE TO 1500 SOUTH 4 4 9,000,000
4500 2016-0947 MP24 - 400 SOUTH FROM 300 WEST TO 600 WEST 4 3 3,000,000
4500 2016-0953 MP31 - 600 SOUTH FROM 800 WEST TO 900 WEST 4 3 2,000,000
4500 2016-0952 MP30 - 200 EAST FROM 300 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH 5 5 350,000 4,000,000
4500 2016-0946 MP23 - Parallel 1000 West Trunk 4 3 500,000 25,000,000
4500 2016-1195 MP29 - BECK STREET TRUCK REPLACEMENT FROM 200 SOUTH AND 300 WEST TO STATE STRE 4 3 16,000,000
4500 2016-0841 500 S. PUMP AND THIRD FORCE MAIN INSTALLATION 5 1 18,000,000
4500 2016-0954 MP32 - 700 WEST FROM 700 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH (EAST SIDE OF I-15)4 3 3,000,000
4500 2015-0660 SATELLITE TREATMENT PLANT 5 0 405,500,000
4500 2016-0948 MP25 - Centennial Lift Station Discharge 1 0 3,400,000
4500 2019-1123 700 S. PUMP AND THIRD FORCE MAIN INSTALLATION 5 2 20,000,000
4500 525003027 2019-1085 2300 E/WILMINGTON AVE/YUMA ST UPSIZING PROJECT 5 4 11,000,000
4500 525002924 2015-0483 Land Easement for 500 South MP Project to Orange Street 5 4 225,000
4500 2016-0842 MP12B&C - 500 South Capacity Upgrades (3400 West to Orange Street)5 4 1,500,000 15,000,000
4500 525002940 2019-1082 2100 S CAPACITY UPGRADE PROJECT 5 5 12,000,000
4500 2019-1105 SOUTH TEMPLE UPSIZING PROJECT 5 5 250,000 2,000,000
4500 2019-1116 Gladiola Street Capacity Project 2 0 4,000,000
4500 2019-1117 Amelia Earhart Dr/Jimmy Doolittle Rd Upsizing Project 3 3 2,000,000
4500 2019-1118 2100 S Upsizing Project 3 3 1,500,000
4500 2019-1119 California Ave Upsizing Project 3 3 660,000
4500 2019-1120 South Temple/200 E Upsizing Project 3 3 1,000,000
4500 2019-1121 700 S Upsizing Project 3 2 2,000,000
4500 2019-1122 N Wall St Upsizing Project 3 2 500,000
4500 2020-1044 MP8B – 3230 West Capacity Upgrades 4 2 4,000,000
4500 2022-1015 PS-1 Capacity Upgrade Preliminary Assessment 5 1 250,000
4500 2022-1016 PS-2 Capacity Upgrade Preliminary Assessment 5 1 250,000
4500 2022-1018 PS-1 Intermediate Capacity Upgrade Project 4 1 5,700,000
4500 2022-1019 PS-1 Buildout Capacity Upgrade Project 4 1 14,000,000
4500 2022-1017 PS-2 Intermediate Capacity Upgrade Project 4 1 9,000,000
4500 2022-1021 PS-2 Force Main Capacity Upgrade 4 1 15,000,000
4500 2022-1020 PS-2 Buildout Capacity Upgrade Project 4 1 15,500,000
23,955,000$ 24,993,000$ 22,505,000$ 25,380,000$ 28,000,000$ 33,450,000$ 732,755,700$
239,314,773$ 242,348,333$ 72,880,324$ 32,701,765$ 28,250,000$ 33,950,000$ 1,141,645,600$
CC51200 SC530204
4600 WEST CAMPUS BUILDING MODIFICATIONS/UPGRADES 40,000
-$ 40,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
CC51200 SC530021
4600 2022-1111 VARIOUS LIFT STATIONS (Annual) 5 5 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
4600 53471040 2015-0066 SWEDE TOWN LIFT STATION 4 4 200,000 131,000 1,500,000
4600 534710109 2020-1144 NORTHWEST DRAIN LIFT STATION RECONSTRUCTION 5 4 450,000 5,200,000
4600 2015-0146 STORMWATER LIFT STATION CONDITION ASSESSMENT 5 5 140,000 140,000
4600 534710113 2023-1053 SIR TIMOTHY LIFT STATION UPGRADES 5 5 357,000
4600 534710112 2023-1052 LIETENANT LIFT STATION UPGRADES 5 5 357,000
4600 2023-1107 400 SOUTH AND JORDAN RIVER LIFT STATION 4 0 3,197,000
4600 2021-1126 600 SOUTH AND JORDAN RIVER LIFT STATION 4 4 3,197,000
4600 2021-1058 900 SOUTH AND JORDAN RIVER LIFT STATION 4 4 3,197,000
4600 2023-1118 900 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE LIFT STATION 5 0 315,000
4600 2015-0144 HARTLAND LIFT STATION ABANDONMENT 1 3 46,000
4600 2015-0145 300 WEST 1300 SOUTH LIFT STATION ABANDONMENT 1 3 46,000
650,000$ 5,914,000$ 371,000$ 240,000$ 1,600,000$ 100,000$ 10,398,000$
CC51200 SC530018
4600 534701213 2021-1065 GRANARY DISTRICT FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION AND RE-MAPPING 5 5
Funded by ARPA Grant:365,000 3,635,000
Funded by DPU:
4600 2021-1110 VARIOUS DETENTION BASINS (Annual) 5 5 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 100,000
4600 2022-1167 ENSIGN DETENTION BASIN RECONSTRUCTION 5 5 376,000
4600 2018-1014 PIONEER PARK DETENTION BASIN 4 4 1,550,000
4600 2022-1115 FORESTDALE GOLF COURSE DETENTION SYSTEM 4 4 1,198,000
4600 2022-1116 BONNEVILLE GOLF COURSE DETENTION SYSTEM 4 4 1,179,000
4600 2022-1137 LIBERTY LAKE DETENTION ENHANCEMENTS 5 0 756,000
4600 2022-1138 PARLEYS WAY STORMWATER ENHANCEMENTS 4 0 3,532,000
4600 2022-1091 DETENTION BASIN 15 IMPROVEMENTS 3 3 386,000
4600 2023-1144 FEDERAL HEIGHTS DETENTION BASIN RETROFIT 5 3 750,000
365,000 3,635,000 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 9,827,000
365,000$ 3,635,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 9,827,000$
CC51200 SC530018
4600 2022-1171 VARIOUS COLLECTION MAINS (Annual) 5 5 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000
4600 534701086 2021-1028 HIGHLAND DRIVE - JSL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 5 5 500,000
4600 534701157 2021-1112 NORTHWEST DRAIN BYPASS TO JORDAN RIVER 5 5 150,000 1,650,000
4600 534701159 2022-1006 STORM DRAIN REHAB - EMIGRATION CREEK AND 1700 S 4 5 350,000
4600 534701208 2023-1043 SWEDE TOWN STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 5 5 873,000
4600 2022-1112 800 SOUTH STORM DRAIN - 200 EAST TO 300 EAST 5 5 344,000
4600 2020-1147 700 W STORM DRAIN - 1840 S TO 2100 S 4 3 774,000
4600 2020-1047 CWA 3 STORM DRAIN - 1500 S TO CALIFORNIA AVE 3 3 931,000
4600 2021-1021 CWA 2 CULVERT REPLACEMENT AT 2270 W 500 S 4 3 423,000
4600 2021-1057 WILMINGTON AVE STORM DRAIN 4 4 2,633,000
4600 2017-2034 RED BUTTE CREEK CULVERT REHAB AT 900 SOUTH 4 4 403,000
4600 2023-1010 RED BUTTE CREEK CULVERT REHAB AT 1300 EAST 4 4 490,000
4600 2022-1118 CITY DRAIN - HUNTER STABLES CROSSING REPLACEMENT 5 4 258,000
4600 2022-1120 ORANGE ST STORM DRAIN - NORTH TEMPLE TO I-80 4 4 613,000
4600 2015-0143 1500 EAST STORM DRAIN - 1700 S TO EMIGRATION CREEK 4 4 558,000
4600 2023-1098 500 SOUTH STORM DRAIN EXTENSION AT BUTTE ST 4 4 620,000
4600 2023-1110 1700 SOUTH STORM DRAIN - 500 W TO JORDAN RIVER 5 3 2,700,000
4600 2023-1114 CWA-3 EXTENSION BYPASS TO CWA LIFT STATION 5 0 4,932,000
4600 2023-1115 I STREET STORM DRAIN - 4TH AVENUE TO 600 EAST 5 0 1,924,000
4600 2023-1111 EMIGRATION CREEK OVERFLOW TO HERMAN FRANKS PARK 5 0 3,780,000
4600 2023-1119 LEE DRAIN REHAB - 2800 WEST TO 2975 WEST 5 4 794,000
4600 2023-1134 600 EAST STORM DRAIN - SOUTH TEMPLE TO 400 SOUTH 5 0 3,062,000
4600 2023-1135 LEE DRAIN - 5600 WEST CULVERT 5 4 957,000
4600 2023-1136 LEE DRAIN - 5500 WEST CULVERT 5 4 575,000
4600 2023-1137 LEE DRAIN - 5070 WEST CULVERT 5 4 442,000
4600 2023-1138 LEE DRAIN - 4800 WEST CULVERT 5 4 712,000
4600 2023-1139 LEE DRAIN - UPRR & 4600 WEST CULVERT 5 4 580,000
4600 2023-1140 LEE DRAIN - BANGERTER HIGHWAY CULVERT 5 4 1,681,000
4600 2023-1141 LEE DRAIN - UPRR & 3900 WEST CULVERT 5 4 532,000
4600 2023-1142 LEE DRAIN - GLADIOLA ST CULVERT 5 4 495,000
4600 2023-1145 900 WEST STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS - 900 SOUTH TO 1300 S 4 4 719,000
4600 2023-1146 100 SOUTH STORM DRAIN - 600 E TO 1350 E 5 3 4,993,000
4600 2022-1139 LOCAL SD IMPROVEMENTS (Annual) 5 5 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000
4600 534701156 2021-1056 LOCAL SD IMPROVEMENTS - BRENTWOOD CIRCLE SD 4 5 550,000
4600 2022-1140 LOCAL SD IMPROVEMENTS - 750 S AT ELIZABETH AVE AND 750 S 2 5 296,000
1,000,000$ 344,000$ 1,850,000$ 2,073,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,200,000$ 41,027,000$
CC51200 SC530018
PROPERTY ASSESMENT AND FEASIBLITY 3 3 250,000
4600 2022-1104 FY 23/24 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES (TASK 1) - STORMWATER 3 3 160,000
4600 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES (TASK 1) - STORMWATER 3 3 147,000 60,000
4600 2022-1106 STORM DRAIN CITY/COUNTY/STATE PROJECTS (Annual) 5 5 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000
4600 2022-1107 SMALL AREA STUDIES 5 5 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 280,000
4600 2023-1033 BALLPARK STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS 5 5 180,000
4600 534701160 2020-1132 300 NORTH SD - 300 WEST TO 1000 WEST 4 4 500,000
4600 534701162 2020-1137 VIRGINIA STREET SD - SOUTH TEMPLE TO 11TH AVE 4 4 200,000
4600 534701163 2020-1139 1300 EAST SD - 2100 SOUTH TO 3000 SOUTH 4 4 1,500,000 200,000
4600 534701164 2020-1138 W TEMPLE SD - NORTH TEMPLE TO 400 SOUTH 3 3 100,000
4600 534701214 2020-1140 LOCAL STREETS SD FY24 3 5 100,000
4600 534701193 2020-1141 2100 SOUTH SD - 700 EAST TO 1700 EAST 4 4 1,600,000
4600 534701209 2022-1150 600 NORTH AND 700 NORTH SD - I-15 TO REDWOOD RD 4 4 500,000
4600 2020-1143 LOCAL STREETS SD FY25 3 5 200,000
4600 2023-1104 MAIN STREET SD - N TEMPLE TO 300 N 3 4 40,000 185,000
4600 2022-1148 700 NORTH SD - REDWOOD ROAD TO 2200 WEST 4 4 48,000 387,000
4600 2023-1149 200 EAST SD - N TEMPLE TO 500 S 4 4 130,000 735,000
4600 2022-1146 900 WEST SD - NORTH TEMPLE TO 600 NORTH 3 3 96,000 1,081,000
4600 2022-1147 LOCAL STREETS SD FY26 4 4 100,000
4600 2022-1149 LOCAL STREETS SD FY27 4 4 200,000
4600 2020-1142 1700 EAST SD - 1700 SOUTH TO 2700 SOUTH 4 4 20,000 420,000
4600 2022-1075 GREEN LOOP - STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS 4 0 6,370,000
4600 2022-1141 BONNEVILLE BLVD STORM DRAIN 4 0 2,500,000
4600 2023-1147 BECK STREET STORM DRAIN RETROFIT 5 4 1,878,000
4,430,000$ 1,361,000$ 2,688,000$ 1,340,000$ 1,140,000$ 1,140,000$ 15,628,000$
CC51200 SC530018
4600 2022-1179 VARIOUS PUBLIC UTILITY DEFINED PROJECTS (Annual) 5 5 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 600,000
4600 2022-1084 CLEANOUT BOX REHABILITATION - 2100 S 5 5 125,000
4600 2022-1085 CLEANOUT BOX REHABILITATION - 2700 S 5 5 125,000
300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 300,000$ 850,000$
CC51200 SC530018
4600 2022-1180 RIPARIAN CORRIDOR PROJECTS (Annual) 4 4 250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 900,000
4600 2022-1182 CITY CREEK - RIPARIAN IMPROVEMENTS AT MEMORY GROVE 4 4 302,000
4600 2020-1120 EMIGRATION CREEK - ALLEN PARK IMPROVEMENTS 5 5 450,000
4600 2023-1111 JORDAN RIVER - GADSBY DAM REMOVAL 5 5 234,000
4600 2022-1094 JORDAN RIVER - CORNELL WETLANDS MURAL 3 3 87,000
4600 2022-1181 JORDAN RIVER - BANK STABILIZATION AT PEACE GARDENS 4 4 247,000
4600 2016-1201 JORDAN RIVER - 1700 SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS 3 3 2,498,000
4600 2015-0721 RIPARIAN CORRIDOR SIGNAGE AND INTERPRETATION 4 4 75,000
250,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 4,343,000$
CC51200 SC530018
4600 2022-1172 VARIOUS LOCAL AREA PROJECTS (Annual) 5 5 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 300,000
4600 2022-1174 CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS (Annual) 3 0 400,000
500,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 300,000$
CC51200 SC530018
4600 2022-1186 VARIOUS MASTER PLAN PROJECTS (Annual) 5 5 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 5,000,000
-$ -$ 1,000,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ 5,000,000$
CC51200 SC530504
4600 2022-1183 VARIOUS LANDSCAPING PROJECTS (Annual) 5 5 50,000 50,000 100,000
4600 534900015 2022-1093 CORNELL WETLANDS REVEGETATION 5 5 50,000 25,000 25,000
4600 2022-1184 NORTHWEST OIL DRAIN (Annual) 5 5 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
50,000$ 100,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$
7,545,000$ 12,294,000$ 6,934,000$ 6,178,000$ 6,240,000$ 4,940,000$ 87,373,000$
4700 51006 SC530006
4710 51006 SC530006
4720 51006 SC530006
4730 51006 SC530006
Streetlighting Rate Change Comparisons
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
(3,775,443)(4,671,160) (4,421,206) (3,786,854) (3,938,328)
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY24
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Sylvia Richards,
Jennifer Bruno, Kira Luke, and
Sam Owen
DATE: April 16, 2024
RE: Budget Amendment Number 5 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024
Budget Amendment Number Five includes 23 proposed amendments, $32,633,928 in revenues and $70,351,358 in
expenditures of which $24,404,465 is from General Fund Balance and requesting changes to seven funds. Item A-3
is a request for $7 million of one-time General Fund monies which would be used to negotiate a loan with the
Thackeray Company, representing several businesses, who are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100
South in the Sugar House Business District. A fact sheet and additional info was pending at the time of publishing
this report.
Tracking New Ongoing General Fund Costs for the Next Annual Budget
(See Attachment 1 at the end of this staff report)
The chart of potential new ongoing General Fund costs for the FY2025 annual budget is available as Attachment 1
and included at the end of this document. If all the items are adopted as proposed by the Administration, then the
FY2025 annual budget could have $380,882 of new ongoing costs. The total new ongoing costs from Budget
Amendments 1 through 5 would be $7,568,554. It’s important to note that $3.1 million of that could be covered by
the Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation State Grant assuming the Legislature continues to appropriate sufficient
funds under the current formula and law.
Fund Balance
If all the items are adopted as proposed, then General Fund Balance would be projected at 28.12% which is
$67,210,724 above the 13% minimum target of ongoing General Fund revenues. It’s important to note that while
Fund Balance at this level is healthy the FY2025 annual budget (like the FY2024 annual budget) is anticipated to
have a relatively large structural deficit necessitating use of one-time Fund Balance.
The Administration has requested straw polls for the following items:
A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan for Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East ($7 Million one-time
from General Fund Balance and Transferred to the Loan Fund)
D-5: Housing Authority PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) Check ($40,000 to General Fund)
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
Project Timeline:
Set Date: April 16, 2024
1st Briefing: April 16, 2024
2nd Briefing: May 7, 2024
Public Hearing: May 7, 2024
3rd Briefing (if necessary): May 14, 2024
Potential Action: (tentative) May 21, 2024
Revenues Update
The Finance Department plans to provide a sales tax revenues update to the Council at the April 16 briefing. Overall
revenues have improved since Budget Amendment #4 when total General Fund revenues were forecast to be $1.4 million
below budget which was mostly driven by sales tax underperforming. The updated table shows total General Fund
revenues are trending slightly above budget partly because of the Funding Our Future 0.5% sales tax coming in higher.
The Department provided some additional details on revenue line items with significant changes:
- Sales Taxes: The regular sales and use tax is $2.7 million below budget while the local option Funding Our Future
(FOF) 0.5% sales tax is $3.7 million above budget. The two sales taxes have different exemptions and percentage
splits between which government entities receive the resulting revenue. This is why the two sales tax revenues do
not always trend in the same direction at the same time. The City took a conservative approach to budget
projections for the FOF sales tax since it was enacted in 2018. The historical is being used to refine FOF sales tax
projections for the FY2025 annual budget.
- Charges from Services: The $1.2 million (25%) increase from charges for services is caused by police off-duty
security (offset by an increase in actual police overtime). Also contributing is an increase in building civil
enforcement revenue as those accounts have been turned over to the collections unit.
- Franchise Taxes: The $925,203 (7.5%) increase from franchise taxes continues a recent trend after several years of
multi-million dollar decreases in this revenue source. The increase is due to water rate increases of about 22%
over prior year that are now impacting city revenue. This trend should continue as Public Utilities is requesting
another rate increase in FY2025.
- Rental and Other Income: The $419,599 (62%) increase is from facility rental revenue due to increased demand
for city facilities and increases in city costs for water, gas, and power utilities which are passed through. There is
an offsetting increase in these utility expenditures.
Fund Balance Chart
The Administration’s chart below shows the current General Fund Balance figures. Fund balance has been
updated to include proposed changes for Budget Amendment #5. Based on those projections the adjusted fund
balance is projected to be at 28.12%.
A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached to the transmittal. The
Administration requests that document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
Impact Fees Updates are pending further implementation of the City's new financial system (Workday) and
integration with Accela that handles building permit records.
The Administration’s transmittal provides an updated summary of impact fee tracking. The information is current as
of 7/20/23. The table below has taken into account impact fees appropriated by the Council on August 15 as part of
the FY2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) . As a result, the City is on-track with impact fee budgeting to have
no refunds during all of FY2024 and FY2025. The transportation section of the City’s Impact Fees Plan was updated
in October 2020. The Administration is working on updates to the fire, parks, and police sections of the plan.
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend” Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring
Impact Fees
Fire $273,684 More than two years away -
Parks $14,064,637 More than two years away -
Police $1,402,656 More than two years away -
Transportation $6,064,485 More than two years away -
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
Section A: New Items
Note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the Administration’s descriptions from the
transmittal for some of these items.
A-1: Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases for Fire Hydrant Rentals ($133,250 one-time from
General Fund Balance)
The Administration is requesting $133,250 to cover fee increases on maintenance costs on fire hydrants in the City. While
Public Utilities refers to this as “rental” fee, it is not renting hydrants in the traditional sense of rent. The fee covers
maintenance costs and use of the hydrants. Public Utilities increased this fee in FY 24, but it was overlooked while putting
together the Fire Department budget that year. For FY 25, Finance is recommending that this cost be shifted to non-
departmental as it is a City-wide expense for a City-wide benefit.
A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention (Total of $1,423,875 from General Fund Balance of which
$1,159,375 one-time and $264,500 ongoing)
In Budget Amendment #5 of FY2023, the Council approved $5.5 million to offer $8,500 one-time bonuses to all police
officers, except executive level (e.g., deputy chief and above), with a two-year employment commitment. The bonuses also
included the City paying the pensionable cost of approximately $3,000 on average to the Utah Retirement System for the
employee’s pension. If an officer left employment with the City before completing the two-year commitment, then they
would need to repay a prorated share of the cost to the City. The date of the bonuses are staggered based on an employee’s
hiring anniversary date. This item is requesting funding to continue providing bonuses to new hires using this same
framework.
The Administration is requesting $264,500 to provide 23 lateral hire bonuses. A lateral hire is when a police officer
working at another law enforcement agency is hired to work at the Salt Lake City Police Department. A lateral hire is
already POST certified and needs significantly less training than a new entry level hire. The estimated cost is $125,000 -
$150,000 for a new entry level police officer from date of hire to completion of all trainings so they can fully operate as an
officer out on patrol. The funding would be ongoing so bonuses could continue to be provided to lateral hires in future
fiscal years.
The Administration is also requesting $1,159,375 one-time to provide bonuses to new entry level and lateral hires expected
in May and retention bonuses to existing officers that haven’t yet participated in the bonus program.
The Department has relied on mandatory overtime to maintain minimum patrol staffing levels at times during recent
years. The Police Chief stated this approach helps in the short-term but is unsustainable in the long term. The bonus
program was designed to incentivize longer retention of officers and faster hiring of new officers. The program goal was to
stabilize staffing levels and help the Police Department reach full staffing within two years. The Department reports a high
participation rate by officers in the program and improved staffing levels.
In March, 34 funded sworn officer positions were vacant and two additional vacancies were anticipated. Depending upon
the completion rate of planned upcoming hiring classes, the Department could reach full functional staffing in 2024. Note
that there are many unknowns outside the City’s control when projecting when the Police Department could reach full
staffing such as the number of qualified candidates applying, the state of the Wasatch Front metropolitan and national
economies, officers on leave, crime rates, etc.
Policy questions:
1. Availability of Vacancy Savings is Pending – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on
available vacancy savings in the Police Department that could be used instead of General Fund Balance to cover
some of the costs for bonuses. An analysis of vacancy savings was pending at the time of publishing this staff
report.
2. Limit of One Bonus – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to confirm that only a single bonus is
offered. For example, if a sworn employee left, then would they be eligible for a second bonus upon returning in
the future?
3. Need to Continue Lateral Hire Bonus Program after Reaching Full Staffing – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration why providing bonuses for lateral hires is recommended to continue with ongoing funding after
the Department reaches full functional staffing levels?
4. Unused ARPA Funds – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to check if there are any unused ARPA
funds that were budgeted but not spent that should be recaptured and obligated for use by the federal deadline at
the end of this calendar year.
A-3: 2100 South Infrastructure Loan for Utility Upgrades between 700 East and 1100 East ($7 Million
one-time from General Fund Balance and Transferred to the Loan Fund)
The Administration may be requesting a straw poll for this item (pending the fact sheet and updated info).
In order to facilitate a faster, less disruptive, and less costly reconstruction of 2100 S from 700 E to 1100 E, the
Administration proposes negotiating a market-rate loan of up to $7 million to The Thackeray Co. as the representative of
several entities in the area that are or will be developing property adjacent to 2100 S. This funding would be put toward
needed water and sewer upgrades in Sugarhouse and allow the City’s contractor to replace the infrastructure in
conjunction with the road upgrades instead of in subsequent phases that would necessitate re-opening the road over the
next several years. Release of the funds will be contingent on the City negotiating a loan agreement with the developer that
would include a market-rate interest rate and adequate collateral should the development not take place for some reason.
Additional information and a fact sheet will be shared with the council in the coming days.
At the time of publishing this staff report the fact sheet and additional information was pending. The funding is proposed
to be transferred to the Loan Fund for better tracking and so the funds don’t lapse to Fund Balance at the end of the fiscal
year recognizing that more time might be needed to negotiate loan agreements. One option the Council could consider is
approving the funds contingent upon later approval of the proposed loan terms.
A-4: State Funding for Avenues Cemetery Road Reconstruction and Irrigation System Upgrades ($3
Million one-time State Appropriation to the CIP Fund)
This budget amendment is requesting approval to receive additional $3,000,000 in State appropriated funds to be spent
on the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation CIP bond project. This request will permit the Summer 2024 bidding and
contracting to proceed without delays for the construction of the Cemetery Roadways and Irrigation project. Funding any
later than June 30 may delay bidding and contracting or add cost to the project PRJ-230007 8323213 - BD Cemetery.
The project is funded by three sources: City's 2022 Sales Tax Revenue Bond (approx.$11,200,000); a state legislative
appropriation ($3,000,000, this request); and by a private donor ($1,000,000, received through a donation agreement
and budget amendment). Bond and donation amounts are combined in Row 20 of "Grant Information". The legislative
appropriation can be given to the City in no fewer than two separate issuances once money is spent down (i.e., a
reimbursement). However, the City needs the funds upfront to bid and award the construction contract. This funding
will be reimbursed by the State once the City spends it (even partially) and reports on performance outcome
measurements (likely FY 26/27). The funding allocation for the $3,000,000 from the state will not be recognized until the
contract is complete, which is anticipated to happen by April 16th. The final “Historic Salt Lake City Cemetery
Preservation” request for appropriation (RFA) from the legislature is also attached.
The request for appropriation states that unused funding should be returned to the State at the end of FY2025 (June 30,
2025). The actual deadline will be determined in the funding agreement between the City and State which could be later.
The total available funding for the Avenues City Cemetery road reconstructions and irrigation system upgrades is $15.2
million (from the bond, private donation, and state appropriation). This would significantly improve those aging assets
but not fully fund the estimated need of $14.1 million for irrigation system upgrades and $20 million for road
reconstructions.
A-5: Traffic Signal for 2200 West and 2100 North Intersection ($450,000 one-time from General Fund
Balance to the CIP Fund)
The Administration is requesting $450,000 to add traffic signals at the 2200 W /2100 N intersection. This is currently a
2-way stop sign controlled intersection in a high growth area of the City. There is a worsening safety concern at this
intersection that a traffic signal would address. Traffic at this intersection has increased faster than anticipated in recent
years, and drivers turning off 2200 West onto 2100 North are finding it challenging to identify safe gaps in traffic. This has
resulted in an increase in traffic accidents at this location including severe injuries. This issue is exacerbated by the
relatively high speeds (45 mph) on 2100 North that makes it harder for drivers to accurately judge gaps in traffic. In past
CIP discussions, the Council has expressed a willingness to fund capital projects to address legitimate and serious safety
issues instead of waiting for the annual CIP process. Some Council Members have also commented that serious and urgent
safety issues should not be forced to seek funding through the competitive CIP process.
A-6: Police Impact Fee Refunds ($47,592 one-time from Unappropriated Police Impact Fee Balance in
CIP)
The City Council set aside funding for the purchase of property using Police Impact Fees. The intended property did not
work for the police precinct. Disencumbering of these funds has resulted in the required refund of impact fees plus actual
interest earned on the funds (as required by state law) due to their expiration. This refund will be funded with proceeds
from unappropriated Police Impact Fees. $38,464 (principal)+ Approximate Interest $9,128 = Total $47,592. At the time
of publishing this staff report, the option of using excess capacity to reimburse the General Fund for past eligible expenses
was being explored.
A-7: Update of the Transportation Section in the Impact Fees Facilities Plan ($29,817 rescope from last
IFFP update and $30,184 from Unappropriated Transportation Impact Fees)
The City is in the process of updating the Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) for Police, Fire and Parks. Updating the Streets
IFFP at the same time will not only be cost efficient but is needed for the efficient CIP planning of Streets and
Transportation. The Transportation bond is nearly complete and updating the Streets IFFP will aid Capital Asset Planning
(CAP) in the preparation of the CAP 10-year Plan. One hundred percent of the cost is impact fee eligible and the scope
includes Streets/Transportation Study and Preparation of the IFFP. The full request of $60,000 is to be funded by a
rescope of the remaining $29,816.67 from the 2020 IFFP appropriation, with the remainder to come from unallocated
Streets Impact Fees.
A-8: North Temple Jordan River Bridge - Riverbank Deterrent Rock Replacement ($165,500 one-time
from General Fund Balance)
The Administration is requesting $165,000 to replace the rocks on the riverbank underneath the North Temple Jordan
River Bridge. The project entails removing the existing rocks and replacing them with larger boulders considered
uninviting for human activities. The request is framed as a reimbursement, but to date, the project is still in the permitting
process and has yet to begin.
In addition to discouraging unsanctioned access under the bridge, the rock replacement is anticipated to have a positive
environmental impact. The Administration has worked with the State's stream alteration division to ensure that the
project follows requirements to improve riverbank erosion control and will reduce scour (soil erosion around bridge
supports, which threatens bridge stability).
The North Temple Jordan River Bridge is currently the only location prioritized for this type of project. The rock
replacement project is one of several complementary approaches to reduce illegal activities in the area. Other efforts
include: a nearby trailhead parking lot closure, temporary fencing to limit access off the paved trail, targeted law
enforcement and overall increased police presence - including a Mobile Control Center on the Fairgrounds parking lot and
addressing limited lighting in the area (some of which is privately-owned).
Policy questions:
Need at other Bridges over the Jordan River – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how much this
approach would cost at other bridges over the Jordan River that are also impacted by illegal activities. For
example, public complaints and comments have noted campfires under bridges that caused wooden parts of the
bridges to be damaged.
Coordinating with the Folsom Trail – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an update on any
impacts this project may have on the planned completion of the western portion of the Folsom Trail from 1000
West to the Jordan River.
A-9: Additional Funding for 7 Days a Week Service from Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team Contract
($130,649 one-time from General Fund Balance)
In the FY2024 annual budget, the Council approved a $598,000 increase to the $802,000 ongoing base budget for
Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team contract. The new ongoing budget is $1.4 million. The Administration is
requesting a one-time increase of $130,649 as a result of two changes that were made this fiscal year. First the Clean
Team’s services were made immediately available to requests from the Police Department, and second, those services were
expanded from five to seven days a week. These changes were made to reduce duplication of clean up requests, increase
response times, and align the services hours with the seven days a week operating hours of the Police Department’s Camp
Mitigation Squads. Without the additional funding the Mobile Clean Team would reduce services to five days a week to
stay within budget.
Services include cleanup of abandoned camp materials, voluntary trash removal from active encampments, and biowaste
removal. The mobile clean team works with the City’s Rapid Intervention Team. Services are provided on public property
except for biowaste removal which is available on private property. In limited circumstances trash removal is also
provided on private property.
Policy questions:
1. Clean Team Funding in the FY2025 Budget – The Council may wish to ask the Administration to evaluate whether
another ongoing funding increase is needed to meet demand for the Clean Team’s Services. The Administration
stated some services are seeing less demand such as the Rio Grande Clean Team and bathroom attendants. The
Council may also wish to ask what is reducing demand for those services and if the need actually reduced, moved
elsewhere, or perhaps there are opportunities for a more proactive cleaning approach.
2. Metrics – Would the Council like additional information about metrics for the Mobile Clean Team?
A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP Holding Account ($15 Million one-time from General Fund Balance
to CIP Fund)
The Finance Department is requesting a one-time transfer of $15 million from General Fund Balance to a CIP holding
account for capital maintenance. This item is to ensure adequate fund balance levels, while also focusing on the financial
need for capital maintenance across the city. The Administration is considering reconvening the CIP resident advisory
board to help determine how best to use these funds in development of the FY2025 CIP budget. The funding
recommendations would come to the Council for approval and release of the funds from the CIP holding account.
The Council’s recent deliberations at the annual retreat, financial risks and reserves analysis briefing, and budget letter to
the Mayor identified deferred maintenance as a top priority for the one-time Fund Balance tens of millions of dollars over
the City’s 13% minimum target. Some specific examples include life and safety projects, energy efficiency, fleet vehicle
replacements and maintenance, traffic safety infrastructure and signage, pavement maintenance, and the large 400 South
bridge project. This proposal would seem to be in line with the Council’s recent retreat discussions about ways to prioritize
one-time money.
Policy questions:
Council role - The Council may wish to confirm with the Administration that the Council will be involved in
decisions about how funds are spent from this account.
Prioritizing capital maintenance – The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether other ongoing,
underfunded City needs were considered for this transfer, and how the administration arrived at capital
maintenance as a priority. The Council may wish to understand further the Administration’s definition of “capital
maintenance” to better understand the types of projects this could fund.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
(None)
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
(None)
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Adding Budget for Finance Grant Position – Correction (Transfer of $14,548 from Misc. Grants Fund
and $46,643 from CDBG Fund to General Fund, and $3,000 to IMS Fund)
In Budget Amendment #3 of this fiscal year, budget was added to CDBG and Miscellaneous Grants funds for a Grants-
related position within the Finance department. However, there was a miscommunication, and the budget should not have
been added to CDBG and Misc. Grants. Both of those fund classes already have the maximum amount of budget added for
personnel at the beginning of each fiscal year. What should have happened is the budget and FTE should have been added
within the Finance department as a general fund funded FTE. The expenditures for this position would be periodically
reimbursed by the CDBG and Misc Grant funds after a time-tracking report is submitted justifying a reimbursement.
D-2: Recognizing Overtime Revenue in Budget ($1,736,505 from General Fund)
The Police Department is requesting a budget appropriation for overtime that has associated revenues from special events,
overtime staffing, contracts and task force reimbursements. The amount being requested is based on what has been
received through February conservatively projected through the remainder of the fiscal year.
D-3: Relocate CAN CRAG Funds ($100,000 from General Fund)
On March 19, 2024, during their review of the annual HUD grant awards for FY 2025, Council asked the administration to
evaluate other existing City rental assistance funding sources and return to the Council with options in relation to a
funding gap for Housing Connect's HUD HOPWA program.
This item provides recommendations and potential adjustments to reallocate the unused CAN CRAG funds to address
Housing Connect's funding gap, and to fund another HUD applicant that was ineligible for FY 2025 HUD funds.
- Housing Connect/The Housing Authority of Salt Lake County, HOPWA Program: $27,800
- Neighborhood House, Early Childhood Education Program: $72,200
Both recommendations are eligible activities per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee: Eviction Assistance &
Rent Relief and Expanded Educational Opportunities.
Note: Per City Code 2.20, Community Recovery Committee, all CAN CRAG funds need to be spent by December 31, 2024.
D-4: HOME Dormant Income Transfer (Transfers $3,463,696 from Housing Fund to Misc. Grants Fund)
This housekeeping item moves the remaining HUD HOME dormant program income in the amount of $3,463,696.23 to
the correct fund. Budget is currently posted to the Housing fund. Due to federal grant tracking purposes, as well as
Finance wanting like to consolidate all grants in the grant fund, the department is requesting to move the HOME dormant
program funds to the grant fund. This budget amendment would move existing budget/funds and will have a zero-sum
budgetary impact.
D-5: Housing Authority Payment In Lieu Of Taxes or PILOT Check ($40,000 to General Fund)
The Administration may be requesting a straw poll for this item pending clarification on the arrangement.
The expenditure budget in the Non-Departmental Housing cost center currently sits at $85,000 while a total of $125,000
in expenditures is expected. This amendment will increase the budget to the appropriate level.
D-6: Airport Interest Budget Adjustment ($21,933,876 from Airport Fund)
The Airport initially budgeted $121,528,000 in interest expense based on the gross amount rather than the net value. The
actual forecast amount of interest expense is $142,900,000. This will adjust the Airport’s interest expense budget to
match interest in our debt service schedules rather than net debt service (interest less capitalized interest). This
amendment will budget the $21,933,876 difference from the Airport fund.
D-7: Open Streets 2024 at TBD Location and Times ($250,288 rescope of unused funds from prior year
Downtown Open Main Street events)
The Economic Development Department has identified a total of $250,288 available to be rescoped for Open Streets
events this year. The location, dates, and times are TBD. The Department stated that a different business district would be
selected outside of downtown and the events would likely be held in the fall. The events would be smaller than the
downtown Open Main Street events of the past three years and have a lower total cost. The Department anticipates no
additional funding will be needed. There are three sources for the funding from the past two fiscal years of Open Main
Street events:
- $57,000 remaining from $500,000 approved in Budget Amendment #5 of FY 2023 for the 2023 Open Streets
program
- $69,128 remaining following the completion of the Open Streets 2023 event
- $124,159.60 remaining from the $250,000 approved in Budget Amendment #1 of FY 2024
Policy Questions:
Plans and Total Budget Need for Summer or Fall 2024 Open Streets – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration for an update on plans and total estimated budget needed to operate Open Streets at a new TBD
location. In prior years, the summer events would be run for 15 weeks from Memorial Day to Labor Day, on Main
Street from South Temple to 400 South, and from Noon to 2am on Fridays and Saturdays. Prior year events had
significantly higher costs than $250,000 (double that amount).
Summer vs Fall Timing for Open Streets – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration the pros and
cons of holding open streets events in the summer vs the fall. Public feedback from prior years suggested some
businesses and attendees preferred summer events over fall events because of the warmer weather such as more
comfortable outdoor dining arrangements, and the coordination with the greater number of special events
happening at the same time which bring more people (attendees and performers) to the area.
Final Report of Pedestrianizing Main Street Downtown – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for an
update on when the final report will be available about options and recommendations to permanently
pedestrianize parts of Main Street from South Temple to 400 South. The study website is www.mainslc.com
Rotating Locations – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether Open Streets events could
be rotated around the city at different business districts.
D-8: Community Reinvestment Agency Act True Up ($3,675, 752 from General Fund – One-time)
In late March, staff received an updated memo from the Salt Lake County Auditor. After receiving this memo (Pursuant
to Utah Code Ann. § 17C-1-606 of the “Community Reinvestment Agency Act”) staff are increasing the revenues and
expenses by $3,675,752 accordingly to account for the final annual distribution. The corresponding memo is attached for
additional detail.
Section E: Grants Requiring No Staff Resources
E-1: WITHDRAWN
Section F: Donations
(None)
Section G: Grant Consent Agenda No. 4
G-1: Department of Environmental Quality – State of Utah – Service Line Inventory ($100,000 from
Misc. Grants Fund)
Department of Public Utilities (DPU) received $100,000 to conduct a service line inventory and produce a lead service line
replacement (LSLR) plan for an estimated 13,894 water line connections in qualifying disadvantage census blocks meeting
the Hardship Funding Criteria of Utah Department of Environmental Quality. On December 16, 2020, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency adopted the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (LCRR) Act that went into effect on
January 16, 2021, and has a compliance date of October 16, 2024. DPU must complete a service line inventory that
includes publicly owned and customer-owned portions of the service line and develop a lead service line replacement plan
between 2023 and the LCRR compliance date. A public hearing was held May 16, 2023.
Section G: Grant Consent Agenda No. 5
G-1: Safe Streets For All ($953,600 from Misc. Grants Fund)
The Office of the Mayor requested $953,600 for the TravelWell Schools demonstration project on behalf of the nonprofit
Children’s Media Workshop. The project tests and refines a multi-media and digital mapping tool augmented with an
educational campaign to deliver multi-disciplinary messaging aligned with the Safe System Approach targeting
underserved populations, citizen behavioral activities, and community engagement and empowerment.
The anticipated outcome is transformational change through real-time identification of travel behaviors, problems, and
solutions resulting in zero deaths on Salt Lake City roadways. Children’s Media Workshop and Mapps Lab LLC developed
the TravelWell Schools digital mapping tool that the project will test on a small-scale to gauge effectiveness and assess for
inclusion in the Safe Streets for All Action Plan under development by Wasatch Front Regional Council. Children’s Media
Workshop has committed to providing the full $238,400 worth in non-federal match, which is often required for grants.
This amount is strictly for the City’s grant match; however, it will not pass through or need to be budgeted for by the City.
A public hearing was held November 7, 2023.
G-2: Marathon Petroleum – Drone Funding ($4,532 from Misc. Grants Fund)
Funding will provide for the purchase of a drone to train first responders and prepare for an emergency response. The
public hearing was held January 16, 2024.
G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Grant ($600,068 from Misc. Grants Fund)
This funding is for the Salt Lake Metro Narcotics Task Force. This contract is for salaries and fringe for existing Salt
Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator. Funding will also support overtime for
outside agencies that participate in the task force. Other expenses: travel, K9 contracts, supplies, equipment and other
administrative costs. The public hearing was held March 5, 2024.
G-4: Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant ($9,280 from Misc. Grants Fund)
The Salt Lake City Police Department is proposed as a sub-awardee in the Utah Department of Public Safety, Bureau of
Forensic Services (UBFS) application for the FY 2022 Paul Coverdell Forensic Science Improvement Grant Program. The
state’s application includes $9,280 for the Salt Lake City Police Department Crime Lab 2023 Annual Accreditation Fee
through ANAB (ANSI National Accreditation Board) under ISO/IEC 17020. The public hearing was held June 6, 2023.
Section I: Council-Added Items
(None)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Potential New Ongoing General Fund Costs Approved in Midyear Budget Amendments (Chart)
ACRONYMS
ADU – Accessory Dwelling Unit
ANAB – ANSI National Accreditation Board
CAN – Department of Community and Neighborhoods
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
CIP – Capital Improvement Program Fund
CRAG – Community Recover Assistance Grants
DPU – Department of Public Utilities
FTE – Full Time Employee
FY – Fiscal Year
FOF – Funding Our Future
GF – General Fund
HOPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids
HUD – Department of Housing & Urban Development
IFFP – Impact Fee Facilities Plan
IMS – Information Management Services
Misc. – Miscellaneous
RDA – Redevelopment Agency
RFA – Request For Appropriation
RFP – Request For Proposal
SAA – Special Assessment Area
UBFS – Utah Bureau of Forensic Services
ATTACHMENT 1
Council Request:
Council staff has provided the following list of potential new ongoing costs to the General Fund. Many of these are new
FTE’s approved during this fiscal year’s budget amendments, noting that each new FTE increases the City’s annual budget
costs if positions are added to the staffing document. Note that some items in the table below are partially or fully funded
by grants. If a grant continues to be awarded to the City in future years, then there may not be a cost to the General Fund
but grant funding is not guaranteed year-over-year.
Budget
Amendment Item
Potential
Cost to
FY2025
Annual
Budget
Full Time Employee
(FTEs) Notes
#2
Item A-1:
Homeless
General Fund
Reallocation Cost
Share for State
Homeless
Mitigation Grant
$53,544
0.5 FTE Community
Development
Grant Specialist for
Homelessness
Engagement and
Response Team
(HEART)
This position is proposed to be half
funded from the State Homeless
Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant and half
by the General Fund for FY2024. The
$107,088 reflects the fully loaded
annual cost for the FTE.
#2
Item A-5: Create
a Public Lands
Planning &
Design Division $12,113
Reclassify an existing
FTE to a higher pay
grade and director of
new division. Request
position be appointed
in a future budget
opening.
Transfer all four (4) full-time landscape
architect positions and associated
operating budget ($543,144) from the
Engineering Division (Public Services
Department) to this new division in the
Public Lands Department. Returned as
item D-1 in Budget Amendment #4
#2
A-6 Sorenson
Janitorial and
County Contract -
Senior
Community
Programs
Manager
Budget
Neutral
(see note to
the right)
1 Senior Community
Programs Manager
This item requires amending an
existing interlocal agreement with the
County. At the time of publishing this
report, staff is checking whether the
amendment could result in additional
funding needs to maintain current
levels of service. The item might not be
budget neutral depending on the
agreement changes.
#2
A-7: Economic
Development
Project Manager
Position
$122,000
1 Economic
Development Project
Manager
Would be focused on the creation of
Special Assessment Areas or SAAs for
business districts and renewal every
three to five years.
#2 A-9: Know Your
Neighbor
Program
Expenses
$6,500
Program expenses were inadvertently
left out of the last annual budget
#2 A-10: Love Your
Block Program
Expenses
$55,750
Program expenses were inadvertently
left out of the last annual budget
Budget
Amendment Item
Potential
Cost to
FY2025
Annual
Budget
Full Time Employee
(FTEs) Notes
#2
Item E-3:
Homeless Shelter
Cities Mitigation
Grant Award
$3,107,201
13 Existing FTEs:
- 2 Police sergeants
- 10 police officers
- 1 Business &
community liaison
4.5 New FTEs:
- 1 Sequential Intercept
Case Manager in the
Justice Court
- 0.5 Grant Specialist in
CAN (half grant funded
and half by the General
Fund in item above)
- 1 Police sergeant
- 2 police officers
Admin expects to apply for grant
funding annually to cover these costs.
General Fund would not need to cover
costs if the State grant is awarded to
the City to fully cover the costs.
Note: Justice Court FTE is part of the
City’s contribution towards
implementation of the “Miami Model”
of diversion out of the homelessness
system.
#2
G-1: Greater Salt
Lake Area Clean
Energy and Air
Roadmap
Coordinator
Position
$482,915
(funding is
to cover
four years
of new FTE)
1 Coordinator
Four years of salary and benefits. The
position would be responsible for
facilitating the sustained involvement
of jurisdiction partners, managing
consultants, assisting with community
engagement, coordinating stakeholder
and public engagement activities and
presentations, and tracking task
completion and achievement.
#3
A-1: Fire
Department (4
New FTEs) $292,638
4 New Medical
Response Paramedic
FTEs
Annual cost; this assumes the Fire
Department requests two new entry
level firefighters to replace the two that
were converted into civilian paramedics
#3
A-4 City
Attorney’s Office
Legislative
Division (4 New
FTEs) $594,441
Legislative Affairs
Director (E34) • Senior
City Attorney (E39) •
Special Projects Analyst
(E26) • Administrative
Assistant (N21) Focus
on legislative affairs,
with special emphasis
on the legislative
session
Annual cost
#3 A-9: Adding
Multimodal
Specialized Road
Markings
Maintenance
Funding into the
Streets Division’s
Base Budget
$200,000
#3 A-10: Downtown
Parking Pay
Station
Replacements
$271,985
Would be paid annually over six fiscal
years from FY2025 – FY2030. The
Council left Budget Amendment #3
open to consider this item later
#4 A-2: Short-term
Rental $49,000
Budget
Amendment Item
Potential
Cost to
FY2025
Annual
Budget
Full Time Employee
(FTEs) Notes
Identification
Software
#4 A-4: Liberty Park
Greenhouses $62,500
#4 A-7: Increase
Fleet
Maintenance
Capacity $312,585 3 New Mechanics
3 new FTE mechanics,
education/training,
software/hardware, maintenance from
outside vendor. Request to finish this
fiscal year is $399,909.
#4 A-8: Police
Officer Overtime $1,829,000 This item would double the annual line
item for police officer overtime
#5 A-2: Police
Recruitment and
Retention
Ongoing
amount of
$264,500
#3 & #5 D-1: Adding
Budget for
Finance Grant
Position -
Correction
$116,382 1 FTE
Budget was mistakenly added to CDBG
and Misc Grants. The General Fund
will front the cost for the FTE and later
the grants will reimburse the General
Fund for eligible expenses
TOTALS $7,568,554 33 FTEs of which 20
are New
Salt Lake City
Revenue Update
SLC City Council Update 04/16/2024
FY24 Revenue Projection
Revenue
FY23-24 Amended
Budget
New Projection through
March 2024
Amended Variance
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
Revenue
Property Taxes 131,752,713 131,752,713 -
Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 117,129,000 114,465,900 (2,663,100)
Franchise Taxes 12,348,127 13,273,330 925,203
Total Taxes 261,229,840 259,491,943 (1,737,897)
Revenue
Charges For Services 4,745,443 5,938,036 1,192,593
Fines & Forfeitures 2,571,547 2,607,446 35,899
Interest Income 8,000,000 8,000,000 -
Interfund Service Charges 26,131,213 26,041,511 (89,702)
Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,159,621 25,000
Licenses 18,434,301 18,438,665 4,364
Miscellaneous Revenue 2,948,012 2,966,118 18,106
Parking Meter Revenue 2,801,089 2,801,089 -
Parking Tickets 1,500,000 1,499,955 (45)
Permits 22,445,026 22,487,608 42,582
Property Sale Proceeds - - -
Rental & Other Income 681,604 1,101,203 419,599
Gain on Property Dispositions - - -
Operating Transfers In 10,130,410 10,130,410 -
Total W/O Special Tax 105,523,266 107,171,662 1,648,396
ObjectCodeDescription
Sales Tax Addition 1/2%49,084,479 52,800,000 3,715,521
Total General Fund 415,837,585 419,463,605 3,626,020
*est
Sales Tax Revenue and Budget
FY July August September October November December January
2024 (millions)6.70$ 7.57$ 8.15$ 6.88$ 8.83$ 7.03$ 7.04$
2023 (millions)6.63$ 7.78$ 8.28$ 7.04$ 7.81$ 8.12$ 6.65$
YoY Chg (millions)0.07$ (0.21)$ (0.12)$ (0.16)$ 1.02$ (1.09)$ 0.39$
YoY % Chg 1% -3% -1% -2% 13% -13% 6%
*Sales Tax Revenue: Post Distribution
FY Comparison 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Actuals (millions)64.897$ 66.324$ 73.778$ 86.533$ 89.091$ 88.000$
% Change 2% 11% 17% 3% -1%
Budget (millions)62.951$ 65.350$ 62.050$ 68.120$ 83.500$ 92.500$
% Change 4% -5% 10% 23% 11%
In millions
YTD Sales Tax Receipts
By Major Sector
* By Budget Period
YTD
July 2023 - January 2024 sales_tax YoY Chg sales_tax YoY Chg
Sector Name (millions)(millions)(millions)(millions)
Retail Trade 27.741$ 0.779$ 3% 39% 28.047$ 0.305$ 1% 40%
Wholesale Trade 9.587$ 1.175$ 14% 14% 8.526$ (1.061)$ -11% 12%
Accommodation and Food Services 8.886$ 1.614$ 22% 13% 9.123$ 0.237$ 3% 13%
Manufacturing 5.257$ 0.709$ 16% 7% 4.509$ (0.748)$ -14% 7%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 2.791$ (0.512)$ -16% 4% 2.782$ (0.009)$ 0% 4%
Information 3.298$ 0.230$ 8% 5% 3.119$ (0.179)$ -5% 5%
Utilities 2.335$ 0.638$ 38% 3% 2.347$ 0.012$ 1% 3%
*other sectors shown in appendix
Total 70.703$ 5.615$ 9%1 69.263$ (1.439)$ -2%1
FY23 FY24
YoY %
Chg
% of
Total
YoY %
Chg
% of
Total
Prior Year Current Year
•Is retail making a come back?
•Manufacturing is not as resilient as retail.
•Acc and food services flattened out and trending down
•Wholesale Trade is trending down since its peak (Q2 2023)
Quarter Trends
*Sales Tax Collection: Pre-Distribution
Trends Looking Forward
Key Points
•Funding Our Future Sales Tax Revenue is
trending over budget.
Trends
•Will retail keep a strong trend?
•Can the other major sectors rebound as
well?
•Interest Rates will remain higher for
longer.
•Inflation slowed but prices remain high.
•The labor market is softening but resilient.
*Sales Tax Revenue: Post Distribution
FY Comparison 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Actuals (millions)64.897$ 66.324$ 73.778$ 86.533$ 89.091$ 88.000$
% Change 2% 11% 17% 3% -1%
Budget (millions)62.951$ 65.350$ 62.050$ 68.120$ 83.500$ 92.500$ 94.500$
% Change 4% -5% 10% 23% 11% 2%
Appendix
Appendix
YTD July 2023 - January 2024 2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 27,741,357 778,960 3% 39.2% 28,046,761 305,404 1% 40.5%
Wholesale Trade 9,587,173 1,174,996 14% 13.6% 8,526,143 (1,061,029) -11% 12.3%
Accommodation and Food Services 8,885,858 1,614,324 22% 12.6% 9,122,934 237,077 3% 13.2%
Manufacturing 5,256,997 708,553 16% 7.4% 4,509,008 (747,990) -14% 6.5%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 2,790,775 (511,934) -16% 3.9% 2,781,673 (9,102) 0% 4.0%
Information 3,297,858 230,477 8% 4.7% 3,119,260 (178,598) -5% 4.5%
Utilities 2,334,701 638,023 38% 3.3% 2,346,994 12,293 1% 3.4%
Other Services (except Public Administration)1,938,533 (51,364) -3% 2.7% 1,978,393 39,860 2% 2.9%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 2,090,818 159,418 8% 3.0% 2,194,797 103,979 5% 3.2%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 1,898,902 106,810 6% 2.7% 1,748,539 (150,363) -8% 2.5%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 1,295,567 87,453 7% 1.8% 1,674,307 378,740 29% 2.4%
Construction 1,250,302 148,368 13% 1.8% 1,116,859 (133,444) -11% 1.6%
Noncategorized (66,309) 135,334 -67% -0.1% (267,183) (200,874) 303% -0.4%
Motor Vehicle 555,680 (68,264) -11% 0.8% 592,980 37,300 7% 0.9%
Finance and Insurance 382,864 25,860 7% 0.5% 392,087 9,223 2% 0.6%
Transportation and Warehousing 597,676 268,334 81% 0.8% 510,972 (86,704) -15% 0.7%
Educational Services 330,734 55,297 20% 0.5% 360,516 29,782 9% 0.5%
Special Events 224,236 38,800 21% 0.3% 254,349 30,114 13% 0.4%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 95,419 27,114 40% 0.1% 44,740 (50,679) -53% 0.1%
Health Care and Social Assistance 79,840 (41,398) -34% 0.1% 57,702 (22,138) -28% 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 73,623 32,455 79% 0.1% 75,243 1,620 2% 0.1%
Public Administration 58,547 57,020 3735% 0.1% 68,537 9,990 17% 0.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 1,419 545 62% 0.0% 7,882 6,462 455% 0.0%
Grand Total 70,702,570 5,615,181 9% 100.0% 69,263,494 (1,439,076) -2% 100.0%
By Sector: July – January Sales Receipts
Appendix
October - December (Cal 4th Q)2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 12,194,475 46,208 0% 39.3% 12,459,287 264,811 2% 41.4%
Wholesale Trade 4,220,952 401,713 11% 13.6% 3,659,828 (561,124) -13% 12.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 3,797,395 664,394 21% 12.2% 3,874,539 77,144 2% 12.9%
Manufacturing 2,333,386 354,502 18% 7.5% 1,937,668 (395,718) -17% 6.4%
Information 1,510,197 173,206 13% 4.9% 1,362,095 (148,102) -10% 4.5%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1,102,466 (276,402) -20% 3.6% 1,070,564 (31,902) -3% 3.6%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 960,750 77,623 9% 3.1% 1,069,696 108,946 11% 3.6%
Other Services (except Public Administration)794,197 (37,684) -5% 2.6% 890,556 96,360 12% 3.0%
Utilities 946,589 300,854 47% 3.1% 1,001,044 54,456 6% 3.3%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 780,129 117,067 18% 2.5% 797,676 17,547 2% 2.6%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 931,872 164,709 21% 3.0% 806,386 (125,486) -13% 2.7%
Construction 489,439 (60,592) -11% 1.6% 477,238 (12,201) -2% 1.6%
Noncategorized (36,181) 30,912 -46% -0.1% (137,572) (101,391) 280% -0.5%
Motor Vehicle 222,289 (16,272) -7% 0.7% 143,927 (78,362) -35% 0.5%
Finance and Insurance 156,910 1,882 1% 0.5% 176,966 20,056 13% 0.6%
Transportation and Warehousing 235,559 37,372 19% 0.8% 219,452 (16,107) -7% 0.7%
Educational Services 133,741 24,742 23% 0.4% 144,665 10,924 8% 0.5%
Special Events 95,596 48,634 104% 0.3% 39,194 (56,403) -59% 0.1%
Health Care and Social Assistance 40,988 (22,719) -36% 0.1% 27,113 (13,875) -34% 0.1%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 40,835 10,051 33% 0.1% 21,791 (19,044) -47% 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 42,784 27,781 185% 0.1% 39,959 (2,825) -7% 0.1%
Public Administration 22,078 21,086 2124% 0.1% 24,129 2,051 9% 0.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 593 250 73% 0.0% 1,475 882 149% 0.0%
Grand Total 31,017,039 2,089,316 7% 100.0% 30,107,677 (909,362) -3% 100.0%
By Sector: October – December Sales Receipts
Appendix
December 2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 4,444,898 (421,259) -9% 40.6% 4,185,815 (259,083) -6% 45.5%
Accommodation and Food Services 1,403,275 179,333 15% 12.8% 1,203,135 (200,140) -14% 13.1%
Wholesale Trade 1,349,081 71,179 6% 12.3% 993,736 (355,345) -26% 10.8%
Manufacturing 795,426 (14,331) -2% 7.3% 611,588 (183,838) -23% 6.6%
Information 565,384 49,342 10% 5.2% 455,613 (109,772) -19% 5.0%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 395,159 (238,372) -38% 3.6% 314,132 (81,027) -21% 3.4%
Utilities 429,058 187,566 78% 3.9% 381,097 (47,960) -11% 4.1%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 383,640 (25,641) -6% 3.5% 296,735 (86,905) -23% 3.2%
Other Services (except Public Administration)262,680 (96,074) -27% 2.4% 242,925 (19,755) -8% 2.6%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 242,236 5,550 2% 2.2% 266,115 23,880 10% 2.9%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 184,867 (158,173) -46% 1.7% 70,686 (114,181) -62% 0.8%
Construction 162,184 (41,239) -20% 1.5% 123,797 (38,387) -24% 1.3%
Noncategorized (6,790) 42,486 -86% -0.1% (132,552) (125,762) 1852% -1.4%
Finance and Insurance 45,694 (12,731) -22% 0.4% 49,933 4,239 9% 0.5%
Transportation and Warehousing 86,880 (25,180) -22% 0.8% 63,787 (23,093) -27% 0.7%
Motor Vehicle 68,999 (19,051) -22% 0.6%(68,999) #NULL!0.0%
Educational Services 45,400 2,662 6% 0.4% 44,727 (674) -1% 0.5%
Special Events 57,762 37,731 188% 0.5% 4,271 (53,491) -93% 0.0%
Health Care and Social Assistance 18,402 (11,918) -39% 0.2% 14,649 (3,753) -20% 0.2%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 465 (9,548) -95% 0.0% 1,805 1,340 288% 0.0%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 10,146 4,045 66% 0.1%825 (9,321) -92% 0.0%
Public Administration 9,541 8,643 962% 0.1% 9,994 453 5% 0.1%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 223 103 86% 0.0%578 355 160% 0.0%
Grand Total 10,954,609 (484,879) -4% 100.0% 9,203,389 (1,751,220) -16% 100.0%
By Sector: December Sales Receipts
Appendix By Sector: January Sales Receipts
January 2023 2024
Sector Name sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total sales_credit Diff FY Y/Y % Ch % of Total
Retail Trade 3,658,024 159,527 5% 40.9% 3,566,253 (91,771) -3% 38.2%
Wholesale Trade 1,172,741 (50,718) -4% 13.1% 1,234,567 61,826 5% 13.2%
Accommodation and Food Services 1,233,275 333,259 37% 13.8% 1,302,025 68,750 6% 14.0%
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 396,724 12,722 3% 4.4% 388,135 (8,588) -2% 4.2%
Manufacturing 493,896 40,437 9% 5.5% 440,315 (53,580) -11% 4.7%
Utilities 504,646 164,100 48% 5.6% 450,428 (54,218) -11% 4.8%
Information 372,233 (64,526) -15% 4.2% 378,987 6,753 2% 4.1%
Other Services (except Public Administration)229,103 (16,443) -7% 2.6% 260,376 31,272 14% 2.8%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 223,520 (25,865) -10% 2.5% 259,954 36,435 16% 2.8%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 63,605 (198,093) -76% 0.7% 320,394 256,789 404% 3.4%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 254,718 (9,632) -4% 2.8% 231,189 (23,529) -9% 2.5%
Construction 88,710 (12,607) -12% 1.0% 170,034 81,325 92% 1.8%
Motor Vehicle 92,079 (8,939) -9% 1.0% 148,396 56,317 61% 1.6%
Noncategorized (22,766) (43,586) -209% -0.3% (130,302) (107,536) 472% -1.4%
Finance and Insurance 58,509 10,833 23% 0.7% 54,746 (3,764) -6% 0.6%
Educational Services 36,198 12,326 52% 0.4% 79,774 43,576 120% 0.9%
Transportation and Warehousing 77,386 56,352 268% 0.9% 72,618 (4,768) -6% 0.8%
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 8,325 (893) -10% 0.1% 4,789 (3,536) -42% 0.1%
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1,689 (839) -33% 0.0% 18,724 17,035 1008% 0.2%
Special Events (3,261) (16,206) -125% 0.0% 72,529 75,789 -2324% 0.8%
Health Care and Social Assistance 7,236 (2,907) -29% 0.1% 4,516 (2,720) -38% 0.0%
Public Administration 2,667 2,675 -36441% 0.0% 3,272 604 23% 0.0%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 138 (10) -7% 0.0%284 146 106% 0.0%
Grand Total 8,949,396 340,966 4% 100.0% 9,332,003 382,607 4% 100.0%
Appendix By Major Sector: Quarterly Sales Receipts
FY of Sale Quarter Retail Trade Accommodation and Food Services Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Information Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Utilities
2019 Qtr1 8,840,669 3,229,510 2,819,637 1,437,880 889,999 1,330,696 650,949
2019 Qtr2 8,980,389 2,977,822 3,125,970 1,600,378 908,116 1,101,265 595,041
2019 Qtr3 8,035,452 3,230,430 2,687,025 1,188,545 918,359 1,175,153 784,179
2019 Qtr4 8,920,143 3,303,139 2,668,238 1,324,535 841,227 1,236,248 589,312
2020 Qtr1 9,126,149 3,103,933 2,671,128 1,449,950 847,159 1,243,391 659,085
2020 Qtr2 9,673,538 2,939,158 2,972,407 1,467,426 974,516 1,043,266 601,858
2020 Qtr3 8,533,575 2,347,658 2,772,559 1,380,079 1,063,300 1,160,602 833,627
2020 Qtr4 9,130,173 1,359,433 2,530,010 1,533,402 924,486 746,459 572,884
2021 Qtr1 9,805,006 1,923,870 3,037,084 1,618,560 987,372 1,046,595 654,253
2021 Qtr2 10,711,287 1,822,128 3,133,787 1,766,834 1,155,358 908,556 595,245
2021 Qtr3 10,002,144 2,197,624 3,034,731 1,683,342 1,107,001 1,184,735 830,309
2021 Qtr4 11,292,340 2,985,179 3,887,127 1,802,172 1,076,364 1,511,988 598,603
2022 Qtr1 11,315,632 3,238,517 3,369,479 2,116,102 1,293,631 1,539,839 710,396
2022 Qtr2 12,148,267 3,133,000 3,819,239 1,978,884 1,336,991 1,378,868 645,735
2022 Qtr3 11,315,774 3,379,011 3,827,142 1,887,582 1,324,437 1,523,307 977,741
2022 Qtr4 11,636,854 3,653,526 4,106,633 1,980,554 1,182,880 1,381,584 779,372
2023 Qtr1 11,888,857 3,855,188 4,193,480 2,429,716 1,415,427 1,291,586 883,466
2023 Qtr2 12,194,475 3,797,395 4,220,952 2,333,386 1,510,197 1,102,466 946,589
2023 Qtr3 11,130,137 4,113,711 3,897,920 1,635,056 1,329,046 1,324,938 1,314,263
2023 Qtr4 11,411,870 4,018,756 3,927,290 2,013,275 1,327,088 1,184,530 842,125
2024 Qtr1 12,021,221 3,946,371 3,631,749 2,131,024 1,378,178 1,322,974 895,521
2024 Qtr2 12,459,287 3,874,539 3,659,828 1,937,668 1,362,095 1,070,564 1,001,044
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATESTREET
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKECITY, UTAH 84114-5455
CITYCOUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________Date Received: _______________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council: __________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 2, 2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM:Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT:FY24 Budget Amendment #5
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT:Greg Cleary (801) 535-6394 or Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE:Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2024 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $5,513,448.00 $32,816,721.73
AIRPORT FUND 0.00 21,933,876.00
CIP FUND 18,450,000.00 3,527,775.33
LOAN FUND 7,000,000.00 7,000,000.00
IMS FUND 3,000.00 3,000.00
CDBG FUND 0.00 (46,643.00)
MISC GRANTS FUND 1,667,480.10 5,116,628.33
TOTAL $32,633,928.10 $70,351,358.39
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2024 Budget Adjustments
The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2024.
To date, revenues are trending slightly above initial budget. At this time, Finance staff are
projecting revenues to remaining consistent with current estimates for the remainder of FY 2024.
Modifications have been made primarily to Sales Tax, resulting in a decrease of approximately
$2.6 million, while an increase in revenue is projected in the Sales Tax Additional ½ % by an
estimated $3.7 million.
The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes
included in Budget Amendment #5.
With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #5, the available fund balance will adjust to 28.12 percent
of the FY 2024 Adopted Budget.
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $32,633,928.10 in revenue and
$70,351,358.39 in expenses. The amendment proposes changes in seven (7) funds, with no
change to FTEs in the city. The proposal includes ten (10) initiatives for Council review and
additional housekeeping and grant related items.
A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration
requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 3/28/2024
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 3/28/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE 3/28/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Business Advisory Board
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
April.Patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment Recommendation: Business Advisory Board
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Isaac Atencio member of the
Business Advisory Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474
WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
March 28, 2024
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Dear Council Member Petro,
Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Business Advisory
Board.
Isaac Atencio to be appointed for a four year term starting from date of City Council advice and
consent and ending on Monday, December 25, 2028.
I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor