Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/02/2024 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL REVISED AGENDA FORMAL MEETING   July 2, 2024 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas.  Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com   CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Victoria Petro, Chair District 1 Chris Wharton, Vice Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy District 2 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7   Generated: 10:38:31 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Sarah Young will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 20, 2024; April 16, 2024; May 14, 2024; and May 21, 2024. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1. Ordinance: Zoning Incentives for Adaptive Reuse and Preservation of Buildings Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings. The proposal would remove zoning barriers that prevent the reuse of buildings and offer zoning incentives to encourage a building to be reused rather than demolished. The proposed amendments involve multiple chapters of the Zoning Ordinance and would apply Citywide. Petition No.:PLNPCM2023-00155.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 11, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at 1544 and 1550 South 900 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of properties at approximately 1544 and 1550 South 900 West from R- 1/7,000 (Single Family Residential) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi Family Residential). Combined, the two parcels total approximately 0.82 acres in size. Future development plans were not submitted by the applicant at this time but the applicant did include a draft site plan in their written narrative illustrating their intent to build townhomes on the property. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. Petitioner: Paul Garbett (Garbett Homes), representing the property owners. Petition No.:PLNPCM2024-00128.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 4, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 11, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   3. Ordinance: Confirming the Compensation Adjustments for Executive Municipal Officers of Salt Lake City Corporation The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance confirming the compensation adjustments for executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City Corporation, consistent with Utah State Code 10-3-818.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 11, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Resolution: Capital City Revitalization Zone Participation Agreement The Council will consider adopting a resolution endorsing the participation agreement and project area with the City and the Smith Entertainment Group (SEG) pertaining to the Capital City Revitalization Zone. The proposed participation agreement outlines how the City and SEG could utilize sales tax revenue to develop the project area. After the City Council's endorsement, the state's Revitalization Zone Committee shall review the endorsed participation agreement and project area before sending it back to City Council for final approval. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCRevitalizationZone.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024; Tuesday, May 7, 2024; Tuesday, June 11, 2024; and Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 11, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)   E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A The Council will consider adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $39,525,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bonds, series 2024A, related to the water infrastructure improvements. The Council's action includes fixing the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the maximum number of years over which the Bonds may mature, the maximum interest rate, if any, or assessment fee which the Bonds may bear, and the maximum discount from par at which the Bonds may be sold; providing for the publication of a notice of public hearing and bonds to be issued; providing for the running of a contest period; authorizing the execution by the City of a supplemental indenture, and other documents required in connection therewith; authorizing the taking of all other actions necessary to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this resolution; and related matters.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 11, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).     G.CONSENT: 1. Resolution: Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A The Council will set the date of Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m. to accept public comment on a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $39,525,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bonds, series 2024A, related to the water infrastructure improvements. The Council's action includes fixing the maximum aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the maximum number of years over which the Bonds may mature, the maximum interest rate, if any, or assessment fee which the Bonds may bear, and the maximum discount from par at which the Bonds may be sold; providing for the publication of a notice of public hearing and bonds to be issued; providing for the running of a contest period; authorizing the execution by the City of a supplemental indenture, and other documents required in connection therewith; authorizing the taking of all other actions necessary to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this resolution; and related matters.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 11, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2. Ordinance: Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention District Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the D4 Secondary Central Business District zoning district to support the creation of a Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention (SECC). The proposed text amendments would make the following changes to the D4 zoning district: 1. Modify the maximum height allowed through design review from 125 feet to 600 feet. 2. Modifying the required front and corner yard setback requirements are changing to clarify that buildings with plazas and other similar public spaces are allowed to exceed the maximum setback. 3. Change the table of allowed uses for the D4 zoning district would change as follows: o Stadiums change from a conditional use to a permitted use. o Commercial parking would be changed from a conditional use to a permitted use. (A current requirement prohibiting the demolition of a building for principal use parking on the property would remain.) 4. Expand the existing sign overlay that applies to the Delta Center to extend to the blocks that contain the Salt Palace. This allows more flexibility for signs related to the entertainment venues within the overlay and allows modifications to signs through the design review process for buildings that are subject to design review. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCRevitalizationZone.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3. Ordinance Clarification: MU-8 Zone Text Amendment The Council will correct an oversight from May 21, 2024 pertaining to the ordinance adopting the Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict in Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code. The clarification relates to including Single-Family Attached as a permitted use in the zone, which is consistent with other building forms in the district. Petition No.:PLNPCM2023-00169.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   4. Board Appointment – Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board – Steve Bloch The Council will consider approving the appointment of Steve Bloch to the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board for a term ending July 2, 2027.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5. Board Appointment – Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board – Michael Dodd The Council will consider approving the appointment of Michael Dodd to the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board for a term ending July 2, 2027.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   6. Board Appointment – Human Rights Commission – Emily Khan The Council will consider approving the appointment of Emily Khan to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 28, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 2, 2024 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   H.ADJOURNMENT:     CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 28, 2024, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. CINDY LOU TRISHMAN SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, February 20, 2024. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Kelsey Lindquist – Senior Planner, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff, Megan Yuill – Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Julie Crookston – Deputy Director of Public Services, Debbie Lyons – Sustainability Director, Sophia Nicholas – Sustainability Deputy Director, Laura Briefer – Public Utilities Director, Michaela Oktay – Assistant Planning Director, Lorena Riffo Jenson – Director of Economic Development, Peter Makowski – Economic Development Manager, Jesse Stewart – Public Utilities Deputy Director, Lex Traughber – Senior Planner, Chimalli Hernandez-Garcia – Neighborhood Specialist, John Wells – Hydrologist, Nannette Larsen – Senior Planner, Angela Price – Legislative Affairs Director The meeting was called to order at 2:04 pm.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1 Work Session Items 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.      Chimalli Hernandez-Garcia provided information regarding: Community Engagement Highlights •Ways to engage with the City: www.slc.gov/feedback/ •Planning Department event/project updates •Public Lands event/project updates •Love Your Block updates ◦Applications open March 1, 2024 ◦Mini-grant application assistance sessions – March 5 and March 14, 2024, 5:30 pm to 7:00 pm •Mayor’s Office Community Outreach Office Hours, including dates and locations Council Member Young inquired as to what the process and timeline would be in terms of wrapping up the current city-sanctioned camping, if there was a more formal plan (in partnership) with the State in place before the due date was reached. Andrew Johnston said the micro-shelter project was identified to be a temporary project lasting through May 2024 with the intention to lead into a second phase on State-owned property starting around the same time. Mr. Johnston added that the State Office of Homeless Services was currently working with the Legislature on funding appropriations, these funding appropriations could have an impact on the aforementioned timeline, and an update regarding the issue would be provided to the Council following the end of the Legislative Session. 2.Ordinance: Yalecrest - Princeton Heights Local Historic District ~ 2:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning map to apply the H-Historic Overlay District, establishing the Yalecrest-Princeton Heights Local Historic District. The proposal includes 43 homes located at approximately 1323 Princeton Avenue to 1500 East along Princeton Avenue. The project is within Council District 6. Petitioner: Paula Harline. For more information visit tinyurl.com/HistoricDistrictsSLC.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 2   Brian Fullmer provided an introduction to the proposal. Lex Traughber provided information regarding: Yalecrest-Princeton Heights Local Historic District •Map of the proposed district •Map showing the relation to nearby historic districts •Local Historic District (LHD) designation process •Zoning ordinance standards for map amendments •Adopted City Policy document updates •Planning Commission and Historic Landmark Commission having both forwarded a positive recommendation for the proposal •Canvass information for the neighborhood/proposed district Paula Harline (Petitioner) said neighborhood equity was a focus, spoke to how the proposed LHD would contribute to density, diversity, and compassion, and thanked Council Members for providing feedback regarding the proposal. 3.Ordinance: Rezone at Approximately 756 South Montgomery Street ~ 2:35 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of the property located at approximately 756 South Montgomery Street from R-1/5,000 (Single- Family Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi-Family Residential District). The proposal would allow the construction of a higher number of residential dwellings on this property and is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the properties to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2.      Brian Fullmer provided an introduction to the proposal. Kelsey Lindquist provided information regarding: Zoning Map Amendment – 756 South Montgomery Street •Subject property – currently in the portfolio of the Housing Stability Division and goal was to further develop into affordable housing •Surrounding context (zoning and land uses) •Comparison of the zoning districts (RMF-30 vs. R-1-5000), including land uses and development standards •Applicable plans and policies •Planning Commission having forwarded a positive recommendation for this proposal 4.Informational: Water and Snowpack Report ~ 2:55 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the Department of Public Utilities about the status of water runoff, snowpack and water supply projections. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 3      Laura Briefer provided information regarding: Salt Lake Water Supply Outlook – 2024 •Salt Lake City’s water service area: ◦Serving drinking water to more than 360,000 people, ◦Includes all of Salt Lake City and large portions of Mill Creek, Holladay, and Cottonwood Heights, small portions of South Salt Lake City, Murray, and Midvale ◦Stormwater and sanitary sewer service, etc. •Determining annual water supply outlook: ◦Current conditions ◾above normal snowpack in water sheds ◾no listed drought in our region ◾soil moisture appears improved ◦High probability of average or above watershed yields this year ◾98%-112% of average for local Wasatch Mountain watersheds ◾Little over a month prior to the start of the water year •Big Cottonwood Creek (2022-2024): ◦Providing about 20-25% of water supplies annually ◦2022 annual yield was 20,700 acre-feet, 2023 yield was 48,000 acre-feet, and estimated yield for 2024 was 35,000 acre-feet •Precipitation and temperature outlook (via the National Weather Service), both being factors in water supply and water demand •Reservoir health: ◦Deer Creek Reservoir being most critical to the City, providing 30-35% of water supplies annually and reliable water during droughts, 96% full as of February, 14 2024 ◦Little Dell and Mountain Dell Reservoirs in Parleys Canyon were also important for water supplies and flood control •Great Salt Lake: ◦Current level was 4193.4 feet (elevation level, not depth of the lake) ◦United States Geological Survey (USGS) information regarding lake levels and the health of the lake (metrics based on wetlands, biology, land use, recreation, economics, and safety •Water demand and conservation: ◦Water conservation was necessary for overall water resiliency now and in the future ◦Great Salt Lake remained in peril although water supplies looked good ◦Communities would be asked to continue to conserve water Council Member Young inquired if contributions from Salt Lake City watersheds to the Great Salt Lake (GSL) were tracked. John Wells said it was tracked to a certain degree, but could be tracked better as far as metrics for usage and what was released back to the Lake, and a good majority of GSL contribution came from the City’s water reclamation facility and metrics were available for that. Council Member Young expressed the importance of the data and as a possible conservation tool for her constituents to ensure they’re doing what they can to help contributions to the GSL. Resolution: Authorizing Transfer of Foreign Trade Zone ~ 3:15 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 4 Council Member Puy inquired in regards to releasing water from Utah Lake, if there was any information shared with organizations that worked along the Jordan River. Laura Briefer said the Jordan River Commission had just formed the Jordan River Watershed Council with the purpose to make more information available to communities, and could so due to their close connection to communities along the Jordan River. Jesse Stewart added that water released from Utah Lake (to the GSL) started a couple of weeks ago, the City was working closely with the Utah Lake Water Users Association, the Lower/Upper Jordan Commissioners and Salt Lake County Flood Control, and roughly 480-500+ cubic feet per second (CFS) was being released right now and could increase over the next several months as more leases came through from the Deer Creek/Jordanelle system. Council Member Petro requested more information on the safety metric detailed in the GSL analysis from the USGS, and if/how those factors could affect westside neighborhoods of the City. Laura Briefer said she would provide more information regarding the metric. 5.Authority  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a resolution that would transfer Salt Lake City’s Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) grantee status to the World Trade Center Utah (WTC Utah). The Administration is requesting this transfer to take advantage of staff capacity and other resources at WTC Utah.      Allison Rowland provided a brief introduction to the Resolution. Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Peter Makowski, and Jonathan Friedman (CEO, World Trade Center Utah – WTC Utah) provided information regarding: •History: ◦Foreign Trade Zone #30 (FTZ #30) approved by the FTZ Board in May 1977 ◾Allowed companies to reduce or defer taxes and duties on imported products ◾Served Northern Utah communities with a 60-mile/90-minute drive time from the City ◦Approved for Alternative Site Framework (ASF) in 2017, reducing application time and adding City fee ◦Past operators/businesses: Cabela’s, Scott Sports, Red Wing Shoes •Current operator: Specialized Bicycle Components from Salt Lake City, a bicycle manufacturing facility who established their FTZ subzone in 2021, and the City was currently working with them for a new location near the Salt Lake International Airport (to be finalized this year) •Future operator: Albion Minerals from Ogden, Utah, a nutraceutical manufacturer, completing their application in 2024 •Next steps and future of FTZ #30: ◦Request support from the Council to provide a letter to FTZ Board to transfer FTZ #30 to WTC Utah MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5 ◦FTZ Board supports WTC Utah’s application and transfers Grantee Authority ◦WTC Utah could support in-house consulting, enhanced service and marketing, saving money and resources for companies interested in the FTZ •WTC Utah being a private, non-profit organization, existed to help Utah companies grow internationally Council Member Puy expressed excitement and support for the change and added that he would be interested in receiving regular reporting regarding the program to ensure City cooperation. Council Member Lopez Chavez expressed support of the FTZ, as it further anchored Salt Lake City as a critical regional player, not just within Utah, but in the surrounding states as well. 6.Ordinance: Landscaping and Buffers Chapter Text Amendment Follow-up ~ 3:35 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Landscaping and Buffers chapter amendments. The proposed amendments would seek to reduce water consumption, enhance the urban forest, and improve air quality and green infrastructure city-wide. The proposal would also seek to clarify, simplify, and reorganize the landscaping and buffer chapter to be more user-friendly. The City Council may consider modifications to other related sections of the code as part of this proposal. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCLandscapingAndBuffers.      Jennifer Bruno indicated there were several changes and clarifications requested by the Council that had been included/addressed within the Staff Report, and the last unresolved issue was enforcement for those who had already installed artificial turf with currently 10 open enforcement cases that were on pause until the Administration could clarify/establish enforcement options. Nanette Larson provided information regarding: Landscaping & Buffers, Chapter 48 Follow-up •The current Landscaping and Buffer Chapter prohibits artificial turf in required yard areas (front yard, corner side yard, and buffer areas) through an administrative interpretation, not specifically called out in the code •The Central Utah Water Conservancy District had allowed for artificial turf in the rear yard and the current/proposed modifications to the Landscaping and Buffer Chapter did not prohibit artificial turf in the rear yard •The current landscaping chapter required 33% vegetation in the front/corner/side yards (all rock landscaping was prohibited) Council Members discussed enforcement options for the current 10 cases of artificial turf enforcement, including: •Fairness of exempting these properties when other properties were made to be in compliance •Sunsetting/remediation plan/program for those under current enforcement MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 6 •A sequenced strategy to address artificial turf now and future legislative intents to address other landscaping enforcement issues Laura Briefer said although Public Utilities was not involved in the enforcement aspect, she was sympathetic to setting precedent on zoning enforcement and suggested further discussion between Public Utilities and the Administration to envision a recommendation that struck a balance regarding enforcement. Council Member Wharton asked Public Utilities and the Administration to look into further enforcement options and to include the Attorney’s Office to ensure future situations were clear and consistent. Michaela Oktay explained that a sunsetting process/plan would prove complicated from an enforcement aspect. 7.Tentative Break ~ 3:50 p.m.  15 min.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 7   8.Informational: Developing a Priority Climate Action Plan for the Salt Lake City Metropolitan Statistical Area ~ 4:05 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the Priority Climate Action Plan for the Salt Lake City Metropolitan Statistical Area (Salt Lake County and Tooele County). The plan is due by March 1, 2024 to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The plan would identify potential actions to reduce greenhouse gases and harmful air pollutants. The actions identified in the plan would be eligible for $4.6 Billion of nationally competitive climate pollution reduction implementation grant funding. Applications for that funding are due by April 1, 2024. The EPA is limiting the number of applications an agency may submit alone, while coalitions of entities may submit multiple applications.      Council Member Mano arrived during this agenda item. Ben Luedke provided an introduction to the briefing, including deadlines for deliverables/applications and grant funding information. Sophia Nicolas and Debbie Lyons provided information regarding: Greater Salt Lake Area Clean Energy and Air Roadmap (SL-CLEAR) •Key deliverables in the grant: ◦Priority Climate Action Plan (PCAP) and SL-CLEAR due March 1, 2024, Implementation Grant Proposals due April 1, 2024 ◦Comprehensive Climate Action Plan (CCAP) due August 2025 ◦Status Report due August 2027 (1:20:20) •Priority Climate Action Plan as defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): ◦Near-term ◦High priority ◦Implementation-ready ◦Authority to implement or pathway being established •Required PCAP elements: ◦Greenhouse Gas (GHG) inventory (includes all of Tooele and Salt Lake counties with a focus on energy use and transportation) ◦Quantified measures (over 50 ideas had been gathered so far from stakeholder engagement) ◦Low-Income and Disadvantaged Community (LIDAC) benefits analysis ◦Authority to implement •Milestones and activities: ◦Interagency coordination (March to April 2023) ◦Salt Lake City submitted application (May 31, 2023) ◦EPA sent SLC award notice (August 3, 2023) ◦SLC Council approved the grant (October 3, 2023) ◦Partnership agreements, consulting requests for proposals (RFPs), hiring staff, eight jurisdictional/stakeholder meetings, Resident Environmental Justice Committee established, public survey, and beginning to coalesce on MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 8 implementation grant application (October 2023 to present) ◦PCAP submitted to EPA (March 1, 2024) •PCAP priority sectors of ideas submitted: ◦Buildings (commercial, home, electrification, efficiency) ◦Electricity (solar, residential, commercial, Utah Renewable Communities) ◦Transportation (electric vehicle adoption, SLC Fleet, mode shift) ◦Natural lands (Urban Forestry – carbon sequestration) ◦Wastewater (biodigester retrofit) •Next steps: ◦Feedback from Council ◦March 1, 2024: finalize PCAP/SL-CLEAR (quantification and narrative) ◦April 1, 2024: submit implementation grant(s) Council Member Petro asked that the Council be considered a constituency/stakeholder group much earlier in the process and suggested small group meetings to further discuss the topic before the April 1, 2024 deadline. 9.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Follow-up ~ 4:25 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about Budget Amendment No.4 for the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes over $1.8 million for police officer overtime related to the Clean Neighborhoods Program, three new full-time mechanics in the Fleet Division, $230,000 to expand a City air quality incentives program, and a new software tool to identify non-compliant short-term rentals among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9   Ben Luedtke presented information regarding the Budget Amendment, including: •Item A-2 – $49K Short-term Rental Identification Software (General Fund Balance) •Item A-4 – Liberty Park Greenhouse Stabilization and Entrance Gates ($31k Ongoing Temporary Greenhouse Operations from General Fund, $250K Re- appropriation of Vacancy Savings One-time to CIP for Greenhouse Repairs OR Stay in Operational Budget for Temporary Greenhouses, and $37K Re- appropriation of Vacancy Savings One-time to CIP for Entrance Gates) ◦Kristin Riker provided history and uses of the greenhouses at Liberty Park, explained the greenhouses had been in a state of disrepair for quite some time and reasoning for the need for park gates ◦Council Member Petro explained the need for a Capital Asset Management Plan to manage unexpected expenses on the City’s historic assets •Item I-2 – $6 M Placeholder for Housekeeping Move of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Dormant Program Income (from the Housing Loan Fund to the Grants Fund) ◦Straw Poll: Support for Item I-2. Council Members Petro, Young, Dugan, Lopez Chavez, and Wharton were in favor. Council members Puy and Mano were absent for the poll •Item A-5 – $558K Public Lands One-Time Budget Reallocation ($333K to the Fleet Fund and $225K to Contract Temporary Labor) •Item A-6 – $130K Fire Station 1 Perimeter Fencing (one-time from Fire Impact Fees as excess capacity reimbursement to the General Fund and transfer to CIP Fund) •Item A-8 – $1.8 M Police Overtime Ongoing Budget Increase (General Fund Balance) •Item A-11 – $250K Replacing Two Traffic Signals Damaged in Accidents (one- time General Fund Balance) ◦Julie Crookston explained the traffic signals were temporarily fixed by in- house technicians and still required a full repair by an outside vendor in order to be deemed fully safe/functional 10.Informational: Financial Risks and Reserves Analysis ~ 4:45 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Consultant about the recently completed financial risks and reserves analysis.      Mary Beth Thompson and Shane Cavenaugh (Government Financial Officers Association – GFOA) provided information regarding: Risk-Based Analysis of General Fund Reserve for Salt Lake City •Council having approved $75K for risk assessment in 2018 •Background/history of the GFOA (established in 1906) •Defining “reserves”: a budget and policy term that describes the resources available outside of the budget for use if the resources appropriated inside of the budget are insufficient, offering protection against unplanned, unavoidable costs MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 10 or losses. •Defining risks the City was subject to: shock vs. stress – reserves being an appropriate tool for shocks because temporary recovery period matches with non- renewable nature of reserves •Examples of natural and human made catastrophes/shocks: ◦Wildfires ◦Earthquakes ◦Tornados and strong winds ◦Floods •Revenue instability (recessions and pension): sales tax (40%), property taxes (29%), other economically sensitive revenues (9%), all other revenues (22%) •Determining amount of exposure to risks/how risks were analyzed: Monte Carlo computer simulation used as standard practice in industries like insurance (around since the 1950s) •Data to build the simulation: ◦SLC’s own historical experience ◦Historical experience in a wider region ◦SLC Finance & Public Safety staff (calibrated estimators) ◦Third party experts (earthquake and county flood experts, etc.) •Consideration of all the risks analyzed •Bond rating agency expectations (SLC having a goal of maintaining AAA bond rating) •Implications: ◦Reducing the “savings account” or the “insurance policy” would make it harder to meet rating agency expectations ◦SLC could borrow from enterprise funds or internal service funds in an emergency ◦General Fund having a role in backstopping some aspects of SLC operations so must be able to stand alone to an extent •Additional factors considered: ◦FEMA/other reimbursements ◦Commercial insurance ◦Taxbase impairment ◦Opportunity costs ◦Spending cuts ◦Annual surpluses and deficits •SLC having relatively small chance of reaching critical threshold in coming years, should not have difficulty meeting rating agency expectations, SLC’s reserves were simulated to remain stable with very slight growth over a ten year period •Next steps: ◦Determining/considering the Council’s/City’s risk attitude/appetite ◦Council/Administration to determine preferred amount of reserves based on risk appetite ◦SLC Council/Administration to consider a comprehensive reserve policy 11.Informational: State Legislative Briefing ~ 5:05 p.m.  10 min. The Council will receive a briefing about issues affecting the City that may arise during MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 11 the 2024 Utah State Legislative Session.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12   Angela Price presented information regarding: •City currently tracking 277 bills, working on over 20 bills, and monitoring 17 bills •Revenue numbers were stabilizing and showed positive progress •HB 562 Utah Fairpark Area Investment & Restoration – was currently being analyzed and reviewed by the City’s Legislative team •Press event regarding the Housing & Homelessness Appropriation recommendations from Governor Cox •HB 298 Homelessness Bill – having passed out of Senate committee with an additional City supported amendment added, providing the opportunity for a provider to be on the homeless council •HB 421 Homelessness Amendments – a third substitute was being analyzed for impacts to the City •Home Ownership Bills HB 572 and SB 268 – creating additional funding opportunities for affordable home-ownership, currently being analyzed and reviewed by the Legislative team •SB 150 Religious Freedom – SLC and Utah League of Cities and Towns (ULCT) both having concerns with this bill, with hopes of additional amendments •HB 396 Workplace Discrimination Amendments – City was closely monitoring this bill •HB 374 – City having opposition to this bill and monitoring closely •SB 214 – City was currently monitoring this bill •SB 224 – City was working with the bill sponsor on amendments for the bill 12.Board Appointment Interviews for the Racial Equity in Policing Commission ~ 5:15 p.m.  15 min. The Council will interview the following candidates prior to considering their appointment to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission: •Alex Vandiver •Chloe Raymundo •Detria Taylor •Diya Oommen •Heather Stringfellow •Jason Hinojosa •Rodrigo Fernandez-Esquivias    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 13   Interviews were held for all candidates. Council Member Petro said Alex Vandiver’s, Chloe Raymundo’s, Detria Taylor’s, Diya Oommen’s, Heather Stringfellow’s, Jason Hinojosa’s, and Rodrigo Fernandez-Esquivas’ names were on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. Standing Items   13.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair   Report of Chair and Vice Chair.    Item not held.   14.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.    Item not held.   15.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 14 (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.    Closed Session started at 5:25 pm, ending at 5:55 pm. Minutes and Recording not created pursuant to UCA 52-4-206(6)(b).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and attorney-client matters. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to exit Closed Session. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 15 Meeting adjourned at 5:55pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Victoria Petro _______________________________ City Recorder – Cindy Trishman Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, February 20, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 20, 2024 16 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, April 16, 2024. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Blake Thomas – Community & Neighborhoods Director, Katie Schnell – Mayor's Executive Assistant, Amy Thompson – Planning Manager, Jon Larsen – Transportation Director, Joe Taylor – Transportation Planner, Laura Briefer – Public Utilities Director, Sam Owen – Council Public Policy Analyst, Lisa Hunt – Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Reed – Financial Analytics Manager, Rylee Hall – Principal Planner The meeting was called to order at 4:02 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 1 Work Session Items 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 4:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.      Katie Schnell provided information regarding: Community Engagement Highlights •Ways to engage with the City: www.slc.gov/feedback/ •Planning Department events/projects •Mayor’s Office involvement for Earth Day www.slc.gov/stewardship/ •Mayor’s Office Community Office Hours (locations and dates) •Salt Lake City events – April through May 2024 Andrew Johnston provided information regarding: Homelessness Update •Homeless Resource Center (HRC) utilization (shelter/bed capacity) •Encampment Impact Mitigation/Rapid Intervention event locations •Resource Fair was held April 12, 2024 at Pioneer Park •HRC Neighborhood BBQ Socials (dates/locations) •Kayak Court to be held April 19, 2024 2.Ordinance: Enacting Temporary Zoning Regulations ~ 4:15 p.m.  10 min. The Council will receive a briefing about ordinances that would enact temporary zoning regulations affecting the facilities located at each Homeless Resource Center: Volunteers of America Youth Resource Center, MicroShelter Community Program, Geraldine E. King Women’s Resource Center, Gail Miller Resource Center, and St. Vincent de Paul Center.      Andrew Johnston provided information regarding: •Details of the mechanism – allowing for the City to enact a temporary land use for up to 180 days in a specific location •The State Office of Homeless Services this year having received more funding than previous years for operations state-wide for homeless resource centers and other programs – funding to continue shelter operations past winter (winter beds) through the summer if the providers and cities agree •Details of the proposal ◦Locations – resource centers, other facilities, and the winter service task force ◦Number of beds only allowed during winter time ◦Requesting the Council approve new temporary land use resolutions for the Geraldine E. King Homeless HRC, the Gail Miller HRC, and Volunteers of MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 2 America (VOA) Youth Resource Center from May 1 through October 2024 (extending shelter/bed availability) ◦Requesting the Council approve a new temporary land use resolution for St. Vincent de Paul for mid April through mid October 2024 (extending shelter/bed availability) ◦Requesting a new 60-day temporary land use resolution to allow operation in June and July 2024 (with the expectation that the State Office of Homelessness Services would find another location by the end of that time frame) ◦The Winter Services Task Force having identified the need for 900-1,000 beds for next winter, planning would occur this year through the summertime, with winter shelter plans taking effect around the first of November 2024 (matching the timing for the land use resolution and lasting for six months) •Being in the best interest of Salt Lake City and those experiencing homelessness to stay indoors during the summertime •Programs outside of the City would have to follow similar process with their own location •Details of State Mitigation Fund •Determining the amount of need ◦The Point In Time Count being a foundational metric in determining the projected amount of beds needed ◦Usage of existing winter beds •The State Office of Homeless Services, after identifying the 900-1,000 bed need, was actively seeking a location for additional permanent shelter options – large enough to handle the need year-round and not just through the winter, but it was unknown if/when this would happen 3.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 West 1300 South ~ 4:25 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning of City- owned property at approximately 1050 West 1300 South from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi-Family Residential District). The proposed amendment would support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 3   Brian Fullmer provided an introduction. Rylee Hall, Amy Thompson, and Blake Thomas provided information regarding: •Details of the request (initiated by the Mayor) •Planning Commission having recommended approval of the proposal •No current development plan as of yet •Details regarding existing and proposed zoning districts (R-1-5000 vs. RMF-30) •Subject property and neighborhood context details •Future home ownership opportunities for the site once it has been rezoned (in a community land trust model) Council Member Puy suggested any utility (water, sewer, drainage) updates needed for the related road be made in conjunction with the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) funded updates proposed for the road resurfacing/new curb/gutter, reducing the impacts of construction, and eliminating the need to dig up new work. Council Member Petro said if community land trust was the goal here, to start activating around increased down payment assistance and credit counseling, as many in her community were worried of being displaced by Major League Baseball development, down payments were nearly impossible to save for, and credit would continue to be a barrier for traditional structures. 4.Ordinance: Citywide Transportation Plan: Connect SLC ~ 4:40 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the 2023 Citywide Transportation Plan titled Connect SLC. It will replace the existing Transportation Master Plan that was adopted in 1996. The Plan identifies five high-level goals, eight long-term policies called “key moves” and over 60 implementation actions to guide transportation decisions citywide over the coming decades. For more information visit tinyurl.com/TransportationSLC.      Ben Luedtke provided an introduction. Joe Taylor and Jon Larsen provided information regarding: Citywide Transportation Plan •Process recap: ◦Plan being rooted in public engagement ◦Values based ◦Not a list of infrastructure projects ◦Plan contained a 20-year vision for transportation in Salt Lake City •Contents of the plan: ◦Vision of the plan ◦Getting around SLC: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 4 ◾How safe the City’s roads were ◾Mode split (the City tending to be more auto-centric) ◾Trends and challenges ◦Community engagement: ◾Community Advisory Council – nine citizens serving a paid position to review applications, with two phases of community engagement focusing on: ◾Values: equity, health and safety, reliable options, affordability, and sustainability ◾Big Ideas: ideas and policy treatments to advance said ideas ◦Key Moves: ◾Authentic and Intentional Engagement – prioritizing underserved populations and marginalized voices, redefine engagement and an opportunity for co-creation, facilitate long-term ongoing dialogue between the City and local communities ◾Zero Traffic Deaths – establish a Vision Zero action plan, create safer streets ◾Great Networks for Active Mobility – improving pedestrian safety and connectivity, expand low-stress bicycling networks, create active spaces ◾Transit Friendly Neighborhoods – making transit convenient and reliable, nuture inclusive and welcoming transit spaces, enhancing the urban context to make transit an attractive option ◾Healing the East-West Divide – developing a community driven east- west transportation strategy, providing safe and reliable connections across the freeway and tracks, reclaiming spaces to serve community and function at a human scale, etc. ◾Low Emissions Mobility Options – building awareness and use of transportation options, managing existing parking supply, developing a curb management strategy, etc. ◾Places for People – leveraging private investment in high growth areas, promoting connectivity at the block level to create walkable districts ◾Operationalize Complete Streets – developing shared goals and accountability for complete streets design and management, developing tools to guide decision making, using street typologies to guide Complete Streets development •Implementation timeline and costs involved 5.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Proposed Budget: Department of Public Utilities ~ 5:00 p.m.  30 min. The Council will be briefed about the Mayor’s recommended budget for the Department of Public Utilities for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 5   Sam Owen provided an introduction. Laura Briefer provided information regarding: •Overview of organizational structure •Department-wide insights for FY 2025 – Budget drivers, budget scoring matrix for water/sewer/storm water operational/capital programs, and for street lighting and capital programs •Department-wide insight for personnel •Department-wide budget overview – total revenues, total expenditures, and summary of utilities fund budgets (operations, capital, debt) •Water Utilities ◦Water utility revenue insights ◦Proposed rate stabilization fee ◦Rate change data for residential customers ◦Monthly rate change impact ◦Expenditure insights (drivers for expenditures) •Sewer Utility ◦Sewer utility revenue insights (projected sewer revenues for FY 24-25 and sewer planned debt) ◦Expenditure insights (proposed sewer expenditures and proposed sewer capital improvement program for FY 24-25 ◦Proposed rate stabilization fee ◦Monthly rate change impact •Storm Water Utility ◦Storm water utility revenue insights (projected storm revenues for FY 24-25 – $28,159,596) ◦Expenditure insights, proposed storm expenditures and proposed storm capital improvement for FY 24-25 ◦Monthly rate change impact •Street Lighting Utility ◦Revenue insights (proposed rate increase of 10%, projected street lighting revenues for FY 24-25) ◦Expenditure insights (proposed street lighting expenditures for FY 24-25) ◦Monthly rate change impact •Combined rate change average monthly impact summary (for all rate changes) •Impact of no certified tax rate increase for Metropolitan Water District of Sandy & Salt Lake (MWDSLS) – a little over $6M would be passed to the water utility, rates requiring adjustment to cover the cost 6.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 ~ 5:30 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about Budget Amendment No.5 for the Fiscal Year MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 6 2023-24 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes an infrastructure loan pilot program to upgrade utilities while 2100 South is being reconstructed between 700 East and 1300 East, a State appropriation for Avenues City Cemetery road reconstruction and irrigation system upgrades, and additional funding for one-time police officer new hire bonuses, among other items. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24.      Ben Luedtke provided information regarding: •There were 23 proposed items •Over $70M of new expenditures of which over $24M would come from General Fund Balance •$7.5M of new ongoing costs (from Budget Amendments 1 through 5) to be added into the next annual budget •Fund Balance (if all items in Budget Amendment 5 were adopted as proposed) would be at 27.7% (or $65.5M above the 13% minimum target) •Item A-1 – Fire Department Public Utilities Cost Increases for Fire Hydrant Rentals ($133,250 one-time from General Fund) •Item A-2 – Police Officer Recruitment and Retention Bonuses (total of $1,423,875 from General Fund of which $1,159,375 was one-time and $264,500 was ongoing) ◦Council Member Petro requested more information on what the previous retention rate for Police Officers was ◦Council Member Young requested more information on what type of lateral raises were being offered by other municipalities and how our rates compared to theirs Mary Beth Thompson, Andrew Reed, and Lisa Hunt provided information regarding: •Fiscal Year 2024 (FY24) total revenue projection •Sales tax revenue and budget comparison (history of budget actuals and monthly collection data) •Year to date (YTD) sales tax receipts by major sector and quarter trends (retail trade, wholesale trade, manufacturing, food services, etc.) •Trends looking forward; Funding Our Future Sales Tax revenue was trending over budget, interest rates would remain higher for longer, labor market was softening but resilient •Current rate of retention for Police Officers (92%) 7.Informational: Capital City Revitalization Zone ~ 6:00 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about Senate Bill 272, including next steps toward creating a Capital City Revitalization Zone, which could potentially facilitate MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 7 redevelopment around the Delta Center.      Katie Lewis provided an overview of the process under SB 272 and approving an up to .5% sales tax increase City-wide to benefit an applicant developing a project area, including: •Defining a project area – an area located in Salt Lake City, no greater than 100 acres, roughly centered around a qualified stadium (major league sports stadium or home venue for a major league sports team) •Defining a major league sports team – either a NBA (National Basketball Association) or a NHL (National Hockey League) team •Purpose of this Bill – creating a process to provide public funding for the development of the Delta Center for either an NBA or NHL franchise under the law and to also develop property around the Delta Center of up to 100 acres •Next step being for the Council to approve a .5% sales tax increase •Application requirements for the franchise agreement (for either NBA or NHL franchise) •Application recently received from Smith Entertainment Group and its affiliates, was currently under review in the City Attorney’s Office (received by the City on April 4, 2024) •Upon receipt of a complete application, the City and applicant begin negotiating the terms of the participation agreement (being the contract for a term of up to 30- years where the City and the applicant were agreeing on what/how the .5% sales tax would be spent on to develop the project area) •Terms to be included in the participation agreement: map or description of project area, description of the type and extent of the tax revenue available, the location and footprint of the qualified stadium, plans for the design/remodel/operation of an existing or new stadium, and a Master Plan •The law specifies what the tax could be used for: debt service or cost of bonds, cost to construct or remodel the stadium, construction/demotion of structures within the project area, aesthetic/entertainment/recreational purposes, infrastructure in roads, traffic mitigation, law enforcement/public security, the City receives a 1% administrative cost (cannot be a direct subsidy to the entity/applicant) •Timeline moving forward/important dates: ◦September 1, 2024 – law requires by this date that the applicant and the City will provide notice and copy of application, proposed project area, proposed participation agreement to the City Council for approval ◦The Council, no later than 14 days after receiving the notice, must hold a public meeting, and by majority vote to endorse or reject the project area or the participation agreement or both ◦If the Council has endorsed both the project area and participation agreement, it will be sent to the Revitalization Zone Committee (RZC), and no later than 30-days the RZC will be required to hold a public meeting and by majority vote, approve or reject the project area and participation agreement. (The RZC cannot make amendments to either the project area or agreement.) ◦September 1, 2024 – law requires by this date that the City to adopt any zoning changes required to effectuate the plan under the participation Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board – Isaac ~ 6:30 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8 agreement ◦December 31, 2024 – by this date, if approved by the RZC, the City will have final approval of the applicant and adopt the .5% tax ◦May 7, 2024 – Work Session presentation by Smith Entertainment Group (SEG), discussing SEG’s vision and introduction to deal points in the participation agreement ◦May 21, 2024 – A public hearing would be held related to the terms of the participation agreement and project area ◦July 2, 2024 – Work Session discussion related to the participation agreement with a potential vote that evening Council Member Mano spoke on SB 272, expressing excitement for what it meant for the City, and said it was an opportunity to keep professional sports downtown, reinvest in the capital City, and solidify the City as the arts/entertainment/sports center for the entire Intermountain West, however; it was an opportunity to undo the racism fueled urban renewal project that led to the eminent domain and seizure of SLC’s historic Japantown to make way for the Salt Palace in the 1960s. He went on to express gratitude for the willingness of Mayor Mendenhall, Mayor Wilson (Salt Lake County), and Ryan Smith (Smith Entertainment Group) to include and prioritize Japantown in the current negotiations for the Captial City Revitalization Zone plans, he would update the Council on his recent meetings with leaders and members of the Japanese-American community on what true reparations might look like to Japantown, and stated his decision to levy an additional sales tax would not be taken lightly, but was certain that the inclusion of genuine reparations for Japantown in this project would make Salt Lake City’s sports and entertainment district the most meaningful, culturally rich and historically significant, sports and entertainment district in the entire country. 8.Atencio  5 min The Council will interview Isaac Atencio prior to considering appointment to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 25, 2028.      Interview was held. Council Member Petro said Isaac Atencio’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. Standing Items   9.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.    Item not held.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 9 10.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.    Item not held.   11.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.    Item not held.     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 10 Meeting adjourned at 6:39 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Victoria Petro _______________________________ City Recorder – Cindy Trishman Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 16, 2024 11 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Cindy Gust-Jenson – Executive Director, Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Kristin Riker – Public Lands Department Director, Aaron Bentley – Chief Information Officer, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Tyler Murdock – Public Lands Deputy Director, Carmen Bailey – Public Lands Deputy Director, Matt Kammeyer – Golf Division Director, Nole Walkingshaw – Chief Innovation Officer, Debra Alexander – Human Resources Director, David Salazar – Compensation Manager, Clemens Landau – Justice Court Judge, Valeta Hitchcock – Justice Court Financial Manager, Kate Fairchild – Justice Courts Administrator, Kira Luke – Council Communications & Policy Analyst, Tim Cosgrove – Council Community Liaison The meeting was called to order at 2:15 pm.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 1 Work Session Items Click Here for the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25   1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a   Tim Cosgrove provided information regarding: Community Engagement Updates •Ways to engage with the City: www.slc.gov/feedback/ •Engineering Department events/projects •Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) Downtown construction projects for 2024 •Housing Stability projects and community surveys •Planning Department events/projects •Public Utilities events/projects •Mayor’s Office Community Office Hours (locations/times) •May-June 2024 City events Andrew Johnston provided information regarding Homelessness Update •Homeless Resource Center utilization data (shelter/beds) •Encampment Mitigation/Rapid Intervention Team location updates •Kayak Court held at Pioneer Park due to problematic river conditions •Winter Services Task Group – weekly focus meetings regarding site options, funding and provider search   2.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Metropolitan Water District Preview, Property Tax Proposal Follow-Up ~ 2:15 p.m.  10 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about a proposed property tax increase by MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 2 the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy, for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/MetroWaterDistrict. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 2, 2024; Tuesday, May 7, 2024; and Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 and Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 and Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3 Annalee Munsey (Metro Water General Manager) and Tom Godfrey (Metro Water Board Chair) provided information regarding: Summary of Proposed Increase/Re-establishment of Certified Tax Rate •Requirement of increase in revenue to address critical, aging infrastructure •District raised revenue through either property tax or water rates •District having adopted a tentative budget which included a 3% water rate increase and an increase of the certified tax rate to 00035% for member cities •In January 2015 the statute stated that increasing the certified tax rate required approval by the legislative body of each municipality that appoints a member to the Metro Water Board of Trustees – the Board must receive approval from their appointed authority to increase their certified tax rate •Both Councils must agree (Salt Lake City and Sandy City) and each City had to be taxed at a uniform and equal rate – Sandy City Council having voted to approve the District’s increase to the certified tax rate on May 7, 2024 •Reading of the report of the proposed tax increase/FY 2025 Tentative Budget by Board Chair, Tom Godfrey, appointed by the Salt Lake City Council, with a majority of the trustees appointed to the Metro Water Board by the Salt Lake City Council present in the audience (report required by Utah Code Section 17B-1-1003)   3.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Department of Public Lands ~ 2:25 p.m.  45 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Department of Public Lands budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD   Council Member Wharton joined the meeting during this agenda item. Allison Rowland provided an introduction to the item. Kristin Riker, Tyler Murdock, Mary Beth Thompson, and Carmen Bailey provided information regarding: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 4 •Overview of the Department ◦Divisions include: ◾Administrative ◾Parks ◾Urban Forestry ◾Trails & Natural Lands ◾Planning & Design ◾Park Rangers ◦161.85 Full-time employees (FTEs) ◦9.08 Part-time employees ◦58.18 Seasonal employees •Organizational chart for the department •Overview of changes from General Fund and Funding Our Future (FOF) •Listing of six Budget Insights: ◦Inflationary and contractual ◦New property maintenance ◦Trails & Natural Lands Division Director appointment ◦Accelerating Public Lands project implementation ◦Park Project Coordinator ◦FOF transfer: FY24 one-time expense to FY25 Public Lands Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund •Key changes/insights – requesting $1.1M from General Fund and $1M from FOF •Forecast for inflationary and contractual increases •Financing for newly acquired properties – Capital Asset Planning Committee to share recommendations for funding options with Administration and then Council •Request for new properties and growth – Glendale Park Phase I •Request for new Project Coordinator position (breakdown of costs) •Trails & Natural Lands Division Director Appointment details •Accelerating Public Lands project implementation and delivery details •Goals of the Department identified in the Mayor’s 2024 Plan •FOF one-time transfer to FY25 Capital Improvement Program details •Streets/parks maintenance recognized for City assets within the CIP books, further review to be made and provided to the Council •Impact fees, General Obligation Bonds, and sales tax (some having deadlines) funding new spaces within Public Lands assets •Working with the Rapid Intervention Team and other partners to provide services in City parks   4.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Golf Fund ~ 3:10 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Golf Fund budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 5 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD   Jennifer Bruno provided an introduction to the item. Matt Kammeyer and Kristin Riker provided information regarding: Golf Fund Budget FY25 •Golf having boomed since the pandemic of 2020 •Overview: ◦Proposed budget total – $20,468,636 ◦Six full-service golf courses ◦Five driving ranges with 15 free practice areas ◦59% of all rounds were booked online ◦34 FTEs ◦253 part-time employees •Rounds played data over the past 10-years •Golf course utilization data (2018 to 2023) •Four key changes/insights: ◦Revenue increase – green fees, driving range fees, golf cart rental fees, etc. ($908,749) ◦Administrative fees – starting wage, equity pay adjustments, administrative overhead costs, etc. ($17,786) ◦Inflationary & contractual increases – water, sewer, stormwater, etc. ($266,059) ◦Golf course re-investments – tee box leveling projections, cart path improvements, Rose Park irrigation project, etc. ($1,098,780) •Overview of total expenses ($11,567,472) •Partnering with Utah State University to test drought tolerant grass seeds at the Bonneville, Glendale, and Rose Park golf courses Council Member Young requested a listing of the Golf CIP projects backlog in a numeric prioritized list, rather than its current form of high/medium/low priority. Matt Kammeyer said he would provide an updated list to the Council.   5.Tentative Break ~ 3:40 p.m.  20 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 6 Set Public Hearing Date - Hold hearing to accept public comment - TENTATIVE Council Action -   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 7 6.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Information Management Services ~ 4:00 p.m.  45 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Information Management Services (IMS) budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The department provides technical support for the City. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD   Kira Luke provided an introduction to the item. Aaron Bentley and Nole Walkingshaw provided information regarding: Information Management Services FY25 Budget •Overview of organizational structure in the Department •Division operations/staffing information: ◦Office of the CIO ◦Innovation & Projects ◦Network & Security Services ◦Software Services ◦GIS & Data Analytics ◦Multimedia Services ◦Field Support Services ◦Communication & Engagement ◦100 FTEs ◦Six part-time employees ◦21 seasonal employees •Summary of key changes/insights, including: ◦Contractual increases ◦Inflationary increases ◦Audio/visual technology ◦Radio replacement program ◦New FTEs ◦New Citywide FTE tech requests ◦Reduction strategy ◦FY24 one-time money reductions ◦Employee changes ◦FY24 budget amendments •Total request for FY25 – $1,824,111 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 8 Council Member Puy requested a breakdown of the communication assistance/resources IMS provided for all the different departments in the City, as well as how the IMS communication team worked with communications staff housed throughout many departments in the City and if any efficiencies/synergies had been found. Nole Walkingshaw said the information was not currently available but was something they could provide to the Council. Council Member Lopez Chavez requested a break down of the contractual increases for City software. Aaron Bentley said that the increases ranged over 100 different applications and would provide the Council with a list of the programs the increase would cover. Council Member Lopez Chavez also requested more information about which softwares would consolidate over time and how many more subscriptions would be funded over the next several years. Aaron Bentley said this additional information would be provided to the Council.   7.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Proposed Compensation and Benefits for City Employees ~ 4:45 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Compensation budget, which accounts for personnel and payroll costs, for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD   Ben Luedtke provided an introduction to the item. Deb Alexander and David Salazar provided information regarding: Compensation FY24-25 Budget •2024 Salary budget forecast ◦Providing insight to the projected and actual increases reported by participants based on type of increase and other factors including state, industry, and organization ◦Basis for Citizen Compensation Advisory Committee recommendation of no less than 5% cost of living increase for FY25 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 9 •FY25 Market-based pay adjustments, including a sample of targeted job titles across departments •Proposed edits/changes to the Compensation Plan for non-represented employees, specifically for shift differential Benefits FY24-25 Budget •Overview of organizational structure for the Department •Four key changes/insights: ◦PEHP Renewal ◾IRS having announced minimum deductibles would increase from $1500/$3000 annually to $1600/$3200 annually (single or two- party/family respectively) ◾50% of eligible employees met their deductible in plan year 2023 ◾Impact of increases of deductibles ◦HSA City Share ◾Proposing an increase of minimums to $2000 for singles/$4000 for doubles/families ◾City to contribute $1,000 for single coverage and $2,000 for double/family ◦URS Midtown Clinic New Benefit ◾Proposal for a Dietitian – employees would have access to one-on-one training sessions and training sessions provided for each department ◦Parental Policy Leave Changes ◾No direct budgetary impact – comes from departmental budgets ◾Proposing 12 weeks of paid time off (eliminating the requirement to apply for Short-term disability concurrently with parental leave)   8.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Justice Court ~ 5:15 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Justice Court budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The Justice Court handles misdemeanor criminal citations, small claims, traffic citations and traffic school for moving violations. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD   Sylvia Richards provided an introduction to the item. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 10 Clemens Landau, Valeta Hitchcock, and Kate Fairchild provided information regarding: Justice Courts FY24-25 Budget •Highlights: ◦Arraignment scheduling process updates – resulting in failure to appear rate decreasing significantly ◦In-person vs. virtual hearings data – 30% being in-person hearings (on the incline), 70% being virtual hearings (on the decline) •Overview of organizational structure for the Department •Overview of requested changes ◦Community Outreach Case Manager position request – due to increase on case load, partnerships, the need to identify gaps and barriers, to provide for successful outcomes through the “sequential intercept model”, and the need for data collection ◦Community Outreach van request (one ten passenger van) – to move staff and equipment efficiently throughout the City for community programs •Total Budget request for FY25 – $150,363 •Division operations/staffing information: ◦Judiciary ◦Management ◦Community Outreach ◦Technology ◦Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ◦Specialty (Homeless outreach) ◦Court Support ◦43 total FTEs Council Members Lopez Chavez and Petro requested more information regarding the increase in case load; if it was commensurate with population growth or was it out- pacing population growth, where the identified “hot spots” were throughout the City indicating those most in need. Kate Fairchild said that was part of the need for the Case Manager position as they currently did not have the resources to collect the needed data to pinpoint the information accurately.   9.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Rose Kjesbo ~ 5:45 p.m.  5 min The Council will interview Rose Kjesbo prior to considering appointment to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 3, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 11 Interview held. Council Member Petro said Rose Kjesbo’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration.   10.Informational: Central Business Improvement Area 2025 - 2028 Written Briefing  - The Council will receive a written briefing about authorizing the Central Business Improvement Area for another three-year period from April 2025 - April 2028 (CBIA- 25). The City established the Central Business Improvement Area (CBIA) in 1991 and has been reauthorized every three years. The current contract was awarded to the Downtown Alliance in 2022 and will expire in April 2025, coinciding with the conclusion of the current assessment area, CBIA-22. The CBIA is a special assessment on commercial properties downtown for economic promotion activities. A second special assessment is levied for holiday lighting in the downtown. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 12 Written briefing only. No discussion was held.   Standing Items   11.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.    Item not held.   12.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.    Item not held.   13.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 13 A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.    Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of attorney-client matters. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Chris Wharton, Darin Mano Final Result: 5 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Council Member Dugan to exit Closed Session A. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Chris Wharton Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Closed Session A started at 2:10 pm. Held via Zoom and in the Work Session Room (location) Council Members in Attendance: Petro, Young, Puy, Mano, Lopez Chavez, Dugan (Wharton absent) City Staff in Attendance: Mayor Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love, Megan Yuill, Lindsey Nikola, Katherine Lewis, Katherine Pasker, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Ben Luedtke, Allison Rowland, Nick Tarbet, Whitney Fernandez Gonzalez, Mary Beth Thompson, Matthew Brown, and Cindy Lou Trishman. Closed Session A ended at 2:50 pm. __________ Closed Session B started at 5:59 pm. Held via Zoom and in the Work Session Room (location) Council Members in Attendance; Petro, Young, Puy, Mano, Lopez Chavez, Dugan, and Wharton City Staff in Attendance: Mayor Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love, Megan Yuill, Lindsey Nikola, Jaysen Oldroyd, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Ben Luedtke, Whitney Fernandez Gonzalez, Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt, Greg Cleary, Debra Alexander, David Salazar, Steven Schubach, Matthew Brown, and Cindy Lou Trishman. Closed Session B ended at 6:45 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 14   Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Puy to enter into Closed Session (B) for the purposes of strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining and advice of counsel. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Chris Wharton Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to exit Closed Session (B). AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Chris Wharton Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 15 Meeting adjourned at: 6:45 pm. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Victoria Petro _______________________________ City Recorder – Cindy Trishman Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 21, 2024 16 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, May 14, 2024. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Deputy Director, Lehua Weaver – Associate Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Katherine Lewis – City Attorney, Cindy Lou Trishman – City Recorder, Michelle Barney – Minutes & Records Clerk, Ben Luedtke – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff, Megan Yuill – Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Lisa Hunt – Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Greg Cleary – City Budget Director, Elizabeth Buehler – Director of Innovation & Project Management, Kira Luke – Communications & Policy Analyst, Hailey Leek – Innovations Team Lead, Angela Romero – Senior Community Program Manager The meeting was called to order at 3:00 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 1 Work Session Items Click Here for the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25 1.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Administration’s Overview and Revenue Update ~ 3:15 p.m. 40 min. The Council will receive a revenue update and an overview from the Administration of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt, Greg Cleary, and Andrew Johnston presented the following (complete presentation available in Meeting Materials): • Thanked those involved in the FY24-25 Budget Committee • Reviewed the General Fund Revenue including the FY24 Adopted Budget ($448,514,918), FY25 Recommended Budget ($475,245,078) and Change from FY24 Adopted Budget ($26,730,160) • Major changes to the General Fund revenue • History of property tax • Commercial property value by Council District final assessed value • History of general sales tax revenue • Gross Point of Sales tax receipts • Total expenditures for all funds • General Fund expense by department • Salary expense major changes General Fund – personnel expenses • Expense major changes General Fund – major changes • Fund Balance General Fund projection • Homelessness services changes Council Members, Mary Beth Thompson, Lisa Hunt, David Cleary, and Andrew Johnston discussed: • Council asked if the drop in sales tax was a lag from the pandemic or a lack of services in Salt Lake City ◦ Data showed it was not from the pandemic • Council asked Staff to provide information on historical turnaround regarding manufacturing after a market downfall ◦ Staff stated they would provide the information to Council via email MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 2 • If the State was working to expand the number of beds available for the homeless, why did the Rapid Intervention Team need to be doubled and what would happen to the team after they were no longer needed • Data showed portable toilets were not being used but people were complaining there were not enough public restrooms and what was causing the issues ◦ Placement of portable restrooms caused homeless individuals to congregate in areas around the restrooms therefore the general public tended to use the portable restrooms less frequently • Appreciation for the State’s help to address homelessness; how was Salt Lake City sharing its experience in what worked/did not work with cities that were just starting the process of creating homeless structures ◦ Andrew Johnston reviewed the different programs/groups (Salt Lake included) that assisted neighboring cities with information on what worked/did not work when starting a homeless shelter • Council wanted metrics on cleanup services for bio-waste and the number of cases that were being addressed ◦ Andrew Johnston gave a brief overview of the clean up process and stated more information could be provided • Council wanted metrics on outreach for homeless individuals and information on how many individuals take advantage of services ◦Andrew Johnston reviewed current outreach activities and how other states address homeless outreach more effectively • Council wanted information on the RV program and how it was evolving • Council wanted more information on the amount of funding for economic development and if it was normal for a city the size of Salt Lake to have such a low Economic Development Department budget ◦ Mary Beth Thompson stated information could be researched and sent to Council 2.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Council Staff Overview ~ 3:55 p.m. 40 min. The Council will receive an overview from Council Staff of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 3 -HQQLIHU %UXQR and %HQ /XHGWNH presented the following complete presentation available in Meeting Materials : ‡Council’s role in the budget ‡ Legislative Branch perspective Ń High level budget takeaways Ń Policy balancing ‡ General Fund revenue percentage change from previous year ‡ Revenue sources the City could control ‡ Addressing the maintenance backlog ‡ ETuity and diversified response models ‡ Maintaining a healthy rainy day fund ‡ City employee compensation ‡ Community outreach and engagement ‡ Highlights to previous priorities ‡ Truth in Taxation ‡ New growth ‡ The budget withwithout property tax stabilization or increase and who paid if the economy diddid not grow at the same rate ‡ Other FY25 property taxfee proposals Council Members, Jennifer Bruno, and Ben Luedtke discussed: • Council asked what the fund balance would be used for if it were not used for new employee positions ◦ Jennifer Bruno reviewed the different areas funding could be used in and stated more information could be provided to the Council • The backlog of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) projects awaiting completion and how much it would cost to complete those projects • Council wanted the cost of updating the irrigation in parks included in the information • Council wanted information on servicing HIVE (free bus passes for school age children) passes for people outside of the Salt Lake school district • Council wanted information on what was being done for street safety • The trigger for Utah Transit Authority (UTA) to cover the full cost to increase bus routes to run every 15 minutes Council Members discussed the request for a Downtown Projects Advisor position: • Whether or not Council Members supported the proposal • Job description for the position Straw Poll Support the request for the full time employee (FTE) related to the management of downtown projects was supported by all Council Members present. Jennifer Bruno asked Council to forward any budget questions to Staff. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 4 15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Finance Department budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.comSLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, and Lisa Hunt presented the following complete presentation available in Meeting Materials : ‡ Finance organizational chart ‡ Overview of changes to General Fund expenditures ‡ Insight descriptions ‡ Key changesinsights 3.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Finance Department a 4:35 p.m. Council Members, Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, and Lisa Hunt discussed: • Different project modules and how each benefited the Council in tracking the cost of projects • How the project modules would help with future budgeting and eliminating overspending • Reduction of employees should happen with the improvement of efficiencies in software • Council asked how tools and ongoing costs were calculated into projects • Council asked to see grant portfolios • Council questioned the thirty percent decrease in internal auditing ◦ Mary Beth Thompson reviewed the changes to where auditing was accounted for in the budget MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 5 4.Informational: 2024 Resident Survey Results ~ 4:50 p.m. 20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the 2024 Resident Panel Survey Results. Salt Lake City conducts a Citywide resident survey approximately every two years by contracting with a research firm to measure public moods and sentiments regarding current issues and City services. The responses were collected in March and April 2024 from 653 participants. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Kira Luke, Hailey Leek, Elizabeth Buehler, Scott Riding (Y2 Analytics) and Tatiana Gilchris (Y2 Analytics) presented the following (complete presentation available in Meeting Materials): • Survey respondent’s demographics • Survey methodology ◦ Sampling ◦ Mode ◦ Margin of error • Demographics ◦ Tenure ◦ Children ◦ Home ownership ◦ Age ◦ Gender ◦ Race ◦ Marital status ◦ Employment ◦ Education ◦ Income MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 6 • Geographic distribution by Council District • Objectives & takeaways ◦ Five key findings to remember • Survey objectives – Research goals • Panel residents – Key metric comparisons to prior surveys • Overall quality of life in Salt Lake City • Quality of life by Council District • Less than half said their tax dollar were well spent • Top 10 rated City services • Bottom 10 rated City services • Neighborhoods & initiatives • Residents find neighborhoods walkable, connected, accessible • SLC residents feel safer during the day • Constituents enjoy SLC’s restaurants and food options • Public safety ◦ Police receive a general level of trust ◦ 9 in 10 believe the Police should build community relationships ◦ Emergency call initiative had nearly unanimous support ◦ Social workers should handle these calls due to specialized training ◦ Those who prefer Police support concern about violence • Family focus ◦ 62% do not plan to have kids • Transportation & roads ◦ Residents agreed that public transport should run later ◦ Residential roads have mixed reviews ◦ City roads were not seen as well maintained • Parks and open space ◦ Residents wanted parks in downtown, Sugar House • City communication channels & website ◦ Just over half of City responses were satisfactory ◦ X being most popular social media outlet for SLC content ◦ Majority of residents do not attend community councils Council Members, Kira Luke, Hailey Leek, Elizabeth Buehler, Scott Riding, and Tatiana Gilchris discussed: • How the weight of the responses were calculated • The time it took to complete the survey • If other cities had seen similar results with the cost of living ◦ Yes, inflation had caused dissatisfaction with City services across the nation • Council asked for a summary of the data related to each of the Council Districts • More time was needed to conduct the survey, allow for phone options, increasing the response rates and research how to best contact people • Account for the different languages, diversity and other various barriers in the different Council Districts to assist with survey responses Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Interview was held. Council Member Petro stated Stacee Adam’s name would be on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 7 5. 5 min The Council will interview Miranda Bradshaw prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 27, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Interview was held. Council Member Petro stated Miranda Bradshaw’s name would be on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. 6.Board Appointment: Sister Cities Board – Stacee Adams ~ 5:15 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Stacee Adams prior to considering appointment to the Sister Cities Board for a term ending July 3, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Miranda Bradshaw ~ 5:10 p.m. 7.Board Appointment: Library Board – Natalie Moldover ~ 5:20 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Natalie Moldover prior to considering appointment to the Library Board for a term ending June 30, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Interview was held. Council Member Petro stated Natalie Moldover’s name would be on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. Interview was held. Council Member Petro stated Gabriella Huggins’s name would be on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. 9.Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board – Bryce Wurtsbaugh ~ 5:30 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Bryce Wurtsbaugh prior to considering appointment to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 25, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Interview was held. Council Member Petro stated Bryce Wurtsbaugh’s name would be on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 8 8.Board Appointment: Arts Council – Gabriella Huggins ~ 5:25 p.m. 5 min The Council will interview Gabriella Huggins prior to considering appointment to the Arts Council Board for a term ending May 21, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 Shiv Parihar spoke to the experiences of participating in Youth City Government, lessons learned, and the need to increase housing in Salt Lake City. Liam Mountain LaMalfa spoke to his participation in Youth City Government and the need to protect the Great Salt Lake. Laynee Hall spoke to her participation in Youth City Government and working with the Utah State Food Bank. Council Members thanked members of Youth City Government for bringing their voice to the Council and being an inspiration to City leaders. 11.Dinner Break ~ 5:55 p.m. 30 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 9 10.Youth State of the City Address.~ 5:35 p.m. 20 min. The YouthCity Government will present the Youth State of the City Address to the Council. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Angela Romero introduced the Youth City Government students. Youth City Government Students: Diya Oommen spoke to her involvement in Youth City and experience with the government. Wild Violet Badger spoke to her participation in Youth City and how the decisions of state government affected students of Salt Lake City. Owen Hodgkinson spoke to his first year in Youth City Government and how it helped him grow, the impacts of homelessness on Salt Lake City and that it was a world wide problem not just a state problem. 12.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Follow-up ~ 6:25 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about Budget Amendment No.5 for the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes an infrastructure loan pilot program to upgrade utilities while 2100 South is being reconstructed between 700 East and 1300 East, a State appropriation for Avenues City Cemetery road reconstruction and irrigation system upgrades, and additional funding for one-time police officer new hire bonuses among other items. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024; Tuesday, May 7, 2024 and Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 16, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Ben Luedtke reviewed the discussion on May 7, 2024, regarding Partial Adoption Vote for Five-Time-Sensitive and presented the following items (complete presentation available in Meeting Materials): •A-2: Police Recruitment and Retention (Total of $1,423,875 from General Fund Balance of which $1,159,375 one-time and $264,500 ongoing) •A-4: State Funding for Avenues Cemetery Road Reconstruction and Irrigation System Upgrades ($3 Million one-time State Appropriation to the CIP Fund) •A-5: Traffic Signal for 2200 West and 2100 North Intersection ($450,000 one- time from General Fund Balance to the CIP Fund) •A-6: Police Impact Fee Refunds ($47,592 one-time from Unappropriated Police Impact Fee Balance in Capital Improvement Project (CIP)) •A-7: Update of the Transportation Section in the Impact Fees Facilities Plan ($29,817 rescope from last IFFP update and $30,184 from Unappropriated Transportation Impact Fees) •A-9: Additional Funding for Seven Days a Week Service from Advantage Services’ Mobile Clean Team Contract ($130,649 one-time from General Fund Balance) •A-10: Fund Balance Allocation to CIP Holding Account ($15 Million one-time from General Fund Balance to CIP Fund) •D-3: Relocate Community and Neighborhood (CAN) Funds ($100,000 from General Fund) •D-4: HOME Dormant Income Transfer (Transfers $3,463,696 from Housing Fund to Misc. Grants Fund) •D-6: Airport Interest Budget Adjustment ($21,933,876 from Airport Fund) •D-7: Open Streets 2024 at TBD Location and Times ($250,288 rescope of unused funds from prior year Downtown Open Main Street events) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 10 Council Members and Ben Luedtke discussed: • Support funding request for Police • The cost of the traffic light • Discussing this with the Transportation Department on the installation of a round about instead of a traffic light on Item A-5 • Council requested more information on where the Clean Team was needed and where bio waste was being removed to help track why the portable restrooms were not being used • Council requested information on how much was the City spending to clean up bio waste from sidewalks and streets ◦Andrew Johnston said the request was to increase clean up services to seven days a week and was more of homeless debris than bio-waste debris • If there was a way to show support for item D-4 now (not later) • Moving the Open Streets program and if the current location was ideal ◦ The current request was to re-scope the funds and hold the event in the Granary District • Council requested more information on what was trying to be accomplished ◦ Mayor Mendenhall stated the difficulty in working with Downtown Alliance was timing, next year timing for Main Street would work better, the move to Granary would be a good experiment to see what a green loop activity would look like in the district • When the request for the Main Street Open Street program would be made • When the request for the Open Street program in the Granary District was required MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 1 1 Sylvia Richards introduced the item. Katie Lewis, Ralph Chamness (Chief Deputy, Salt Lake County District Attorney’s Office), Scott Fisher (First Assistant Prosecutor, Salt Lake County District Attorney’s Office), and Paige Williamson (First Assistant Prosecutor, Salt Lake County District Attorney’s Office) presented the following (complete presentation available in Meeting Materials): • City Attorney’s Office Organizational Chart • Insight Descriptions – Operations • Insight Descriptions – Personnel Funds • Dedicated Arrangement Judge Model • Rotating Arraignment Judge Model (all five judges move through week by week) Council Members, Katie Lewis, Ralph Chamness, Scott Fisher, and Paige Williamson discussed: • Council commended the Legislative team for the work load they handled and stated there would never be enough to compensate them for all they do • Council thanked the Recorders Office for the knowledge and expertise they provided not only while attending Council meetings but in all aspects of servicing the City • Council inquired about the current work load of the Prosecution team and if any cases were being held up • The Rotating Arraignment Judge Model would improve the current system by providing five judges, rotating on a week to week basis instead of on judge trying to juggle the large case load MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 1 2 13.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Office of the City Attorney ~ 6:55 p.m. 30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed Attorney’s Office budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 14, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items. There were no announcements. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 1  Standing Items - - 14.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair Report of Chair and Vice Chair. Council Member Petro spoke to the SEG Development meetings regarding Japantown that she and Council Member Mano attended. Council Memeber Petro and Council Member Puy attended a meeting with Symphony Members, Salt Lake County Mayor, and owners of the Delta Center regarding potential changes to Abravanel Hall. Council Member Mano thanked everyone involved in the conversations regarding Japantown and spoke to the expression of hope people shared after the meeting. 15.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director - - MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 - - 16.Tentative Closed Session The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Closed Session began at 7:45 pm Held via Zoom and in the Work Session Room (location) Council Members in Attendance: Council Members Petro, Puy, Wharton, Lopez Chavez, Mano, Dugan, and Young. City Staff in Attendance: Mayor Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Megan Yuill, Lindsey Nikola, Katherine Lewis, Allison Parks, Katherine Pasker, Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Ben Luedtke, Nick Tarbet, Matthew Brown, and Cindy Lou Trishman. Closed Session ended at 9:05 pm 14 Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of attorney-client matters. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to exit closed session and adjourn. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 14, 2024 15 Meeting adjourned at 9:05 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair Victoria Petro _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, May 14, 2024 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. Item B1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:July 2, 2024 RE: Zoning Incentives for Adaptive Reuse and Preservation of Buildings PLNPCM2023-00155 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:July 2, 2024 RE: Zoning Incentives for Adaptive Reuse and Preservation of Buildings PLNPCM2023-00155 BRIEFING UPDATE During the May 30, 2024 briefing Council Members were generally supportive of a rolling age of buildings at least 50 years old, rather than a set date of, for example, buildings constructed prior to 1976. The draft ordinance has been updated to reflect the rolling building age. A question was raised about bird friendly glass in the buildings. Planning staff said affected buildings are generally older, and existing glass along with other character defining features would be allowed to remain. They further stated that they found bird friendly glass is hard to come by and expensive. Reducing the upper floor glass requirement would result in less surface area that birds might hit. In response to a question about the difference between the proposed incentives and the recently adopted affordable housing incentives, Planning staff noted the A-incentives only apply to existing buildings and shared the following table. Item Schedule: Briefing: May 30, 2024 Set Date: June 11, 2024 Public Hearing: July 2, 2024 Potential Action: July 9, 2024 Page | 2 The following information was provided for May 30, 2024 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal requested by Mayor Mendenhall to amend the zoning ordinance to encourage and support adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings. The City Code currently has several barriers complicating reuse of buildings. The proposal addresses these barriers and adds incentives to the ordinance that encourage reusing buildings citywide. Under the proposal, a new “Building Preservation Incentives” section would be added to Chapter 21A.52, Zoning Incentives. This new section includes two subsections, Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings (“A Incentives”), and Preservation of a Principal Building (“B Incentives”). “A Incentives” provide flexibility in uses for eligible buildings important to neighborhoods such as those on the National Register of Historic Places, and buildings formerly used for churches, schools, or hospitals, among others. “B Incentives” apply to eligible buildings at least 50 years old that are being preserved and cover at least 25% of a development site. They may also apply to new construction on the same site. Both incentives are discussed in more detail in the Additional Information section below. Page | 3 Planning staff researched other cities with ordinances offering incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings. These cities included, Austin, El Paso, Los Angeles, Dever, Nashville, Tucson, Tempe, Pittsburgh, St. Petersburg, and Portland. The following features were researched: location within the city where incentives are offered, eligibility criteria, goals of the incentives, and what incentives are offered. These are discussed on pages 6-7 of the Planning Commission staff report. Planning also created a focus group primarily consisting of architects and developers to gain additional insight into challenges and barriers to utilizing existing buildings. Feedback provided was that the incentives need to make it more economically viable to keep a building rather than tear it down when redeveloping a property. The development potential of a property frequently makes it more attractive from an economic perspective to demolish buildings rather than preserve and reuse them. The Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their meetings. Both commissions voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. Two ordinance proposals Planning included two versions of the proposed ordinance. Version 1 was prepared for the Planning Commission meeting. Version 2 includes changes to the “B Incentives” that planning staff identified after the Planning Commission’s recommendation, based on questions raised during their discussion. These are listed below on page 3. 1. Does the Council prefer to keep the original proposed ordinance (ordinance version 1)? 2. Is the Council supportive of Planning staff’s proposed changes related to building age, design standards for upper floor glass, and building entrances and included in ordinance version 2? Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal after a public hearing, which will be set for July 2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION “A Incentives” offer use flexibility in eligible buildings which are important to the neighborhood and generally have artistic, historic, or cultural value, or are large underutilized buildings. Currently, the ordinance for adaptive reuse of a landmark site allows nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential district, provided the use meets standards for preservation of the building’s character and neighborhood compatibility. The proposal adds the following found on page 2 of the Administration’s transmittal: •Broadens eligibility to include buildings that are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places, buildings formerly used for churches, schools, or hospitals, and other culturally or historically significant buildings. •Allows residential uses in addition to the nonresidential uses already allowed through this process. The proposal would also allow for residential uses in eligible buildings in the Public Lands (PL) and Institutional (I) zones where the only residential use currently allowed is living quarters for a caretaker or security guard. •Prohibit certain uses. Impactful uses were identified as prohibited because of their potential for negative impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and to the eligible building. •Removes minimum square footage requirement. The current building square footage minimum of 7,000 square feet is a significant obstacle to qualify for adaptive reuse incentives. “B Incentives” apply to eligible buildings at least 50 years old that are being preserved and cover a minimum of 25% of a development site. They can also apply to new construction on the same site. Rather Page | 4 than use incentives like those listed above, these proposed incentives modify base zoning requirements for allowed uses. The following summary of “B Incentives” is found on page 3 of the Administration’s transmittal: •Removes the planned development requirement for modifications that are commonly requested through this process but are generally straightforward such as creating lots without street frontage and having buildings on the same parcel without all buildings having public street frontage. •Includes the addition of an Administrative Planned Development process for certain zoning modifications to allow for a more streamlined review process for eligible projects. •Removes the minimum lot area and width requirements for all zones except single family zoning districts. •Includes additional building height in various zoning districts through administrative design review. Currently, there is no height incentive being offered in the single, two-family and RMF zoning districts. •Reduces parking for eligible projects. Based on questions raised in the Planning Commission meeting planning staff identified the following potential modifications to “B Incentives” found on pages 3-4 of the transmittal for the Council to consider. These are included in version 2 of the draft ordinance. “B Incentive” for Building Age Eligibility During the Planning Commission meeting a Commissioner expressed some concern with ordinance language stating eligible buildings must be at least 50 years old. This rolling date would allow buildings constructed in the 1980s and 1990s to become eligible for incentives in the coming years. The concern is that some buildings from that era and later are not worth preserving. Planning suggested that the Council could consider fixed date language that requires eligible buildings to be built prior to 1976. Design Standards for New Construction Utilizing the “B Incentives.” Unless stricter design standards are required within the zoning district where a property is located, projects utilizing the incentives must meet specific design standards in the proposed ordinance. Planning recommends some changes to the following proposed design standards: •Upper Floor Glass-The Planning Commission reviewed a draft ordinance that requires the surface area of each floor’s façade to contain a minimum of 50% glass, which can be reduced to 25% on the ground floor for residential use. After review, Planning believes that the 50% threshold is too high for upper levels of buildings. Only the Downtown zones and Gateway Mixed Use zones have an upper-level glass requirement of 50% and it is difficult for projects in those zones to meet the requirement without a request for a design review modification. General Commercial zoning requires 25%, the FB-UN and RMF-30 zones require 15%, and the other zones do not have an upper floor glass requirement. Planning staff recommends reducing the upper floor glass requirement to 20% for projects that utilize the incentives. Zones that have a higher percentage requirement will still be subject to the higher standards. Planning also recommends adding language to clarify that glass requirements are consistent with the design standards chapter regarding the location of ground floor glass between 3-8 feet on the building and unobstructed visibility into the space. •Building Entrances-Planning staff recommends adding language to the building entrances design standard to address that entry features such as unenclosed entry porches, porticos, awnings or canopies, or emphasized doorways for required building entrances need to meet descriptions in City code for these entry features. Page | 5 KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 7-13 of the Planning Commission staff report, and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning staff report. Consideration 1-How the proposed amendment helps implement City goals and policies identified in adopted plans: Planning staff found that the proposed amendment generally aligns with the guiding principles, policies, and goals found in Plan Salt Lake, Housing SLC, Sustainable Salt Lake, the Salt Lake City Community Preservation Plan, Thriving in Place, and various neighborhood plans. Consideration 2-Changes Made After Commission Briefings: Planning staff made some changes to the original proposal largely based on feedback from Historic Landmark and Planning Commissioner feedback during the briefings. The proposed changes are summarized below. •Parking for multi-family minimum has been reduced from one space per dwelling unit to 0.5 spaces. Requiring one space per dwelling unit was not a significant incentive, particularly in the RMF zones where reduced parking would be beneficial because other incentives such as additional height are not being offered. •Existing building parking: If existing parking exceeds minimums under the proposed incentive, only the minimum required needs to be kept. •“A Incentives – Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings: Multi-family is being proposed as a permitted rather than conditional use for eligible existing buildings meeting “A Incentives” eligibility requirements in most residential zones and the I-Institutional zone. It is believed that impacts on adjacent properties may be less with an existing building. •“B Incentives” – Preservation of a Principal Building: o Building Eligibility: a previous draft proposed buildings needed to be at least 30 years old to be eligible for the incentives. The current proposal has been changed to require buildings to be at least 50 years old. It is believed that 30-year-old buildings are less likely to be demolished than those 50 years old or older. Rather than a rolling date of buildings being at least 30 or 50 years old, the Council could consider fixed date language requiring eligible buildings to be built prior to 1976 as noted above. o Single- and Two-Family Zoning Districts: The current proposal includes incentives for single- and two-family zones. Creating a lot without public street frontage and reduced lot width would not require a planned development. Lot area requirements would still apply in the FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R-1/12,000, 7,000, and 5,000 zoning districts. Lot area requirements would not apply to SR-1/1A, and R-2 zones to incentivize dividing properties and create additional units where two-family and twin homes are permitted but limited by lot area requirements. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment D (pages 28-29) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Page | 6 Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. See below* The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Complies * 10 overlay districts would be affected by the proposal. These are included on page 53 of the Planning Commission staff report. Planning staff noted “The proposed amendments would be limited by additional standards in many of these overlay zoning districts. The base and overlay districts may provide additional standards and restrictions than provided for in these incentives. Except as indicated with the proposed incentives, all base zoning district or overlay zoning district standards and requirements take precedence over the proposed incentives.” Planning stated the following related to Properties in the H Historic Preservation Overlay District: Regarding properties that are subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay District, which includes properties within a local historic districts or local landmark sites, the proposed incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of principal buildings would not change the historic standards, guidelines, or processes. The historic landmark commission, who is authorized to implement the H Historic Preservation Overlay District, already has the authority to modify base zoning district regulations, such as setbacks, height and lot coverage. As a result of these authorized modifications, most properties subject to the H overlay only need approval from the historic landmark commission. The projects that also require approval from the planning commission are typically projects that include creating a lot that doesn’t have public street frontage, necessitating a planned development. With the introduction of the proposed incentives, the need for a planned development for such lots would be eliminated, thereby making the approval process more efficient for properties subject to the H overlay. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • February 16, 2023 – Mayor Mendenhall signed the petition initiation. • April 17, 2023 – Initial information posted to the City’s online open house webpage. • April 20, 2023 – Initial information emailed to recognized organizations, focus group and stakeholders, for the purpose of gathering early feedback to inform the draft ordinance. • July 18, 2023 – All recognized organizations were sent the 45-day required notice for text amendments that included a draft ordinance for review. Focus group and stakeholders were also provided with updated information with a draft ordinance for review. • August 3, 2023 – Historic Landmark Commission briefing. • August 21, 2023 – Planning staff presented at Sugar House Community Council Land Use Committee. • September 27, 2023 – Planning Commission briefing. Page | 7 • October 11, 2023 – Proposal presented to Business Advisory Board. • October 19, 2023 – Public hearing notice posted to City and State websites and a hearing notice posted in the following public libraries: Main, Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch, Marmalade, Fairpark, Glendale and Sprague. • October 26, 2023 – Staff report for the Historic Landmark Commission hearing posted to Planning’s website. • November 2, 2023 – The Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council. • February 15, 2024 – Public hearing notice posted to City and State websites and a notice of the hearing was posted in the following public libraries: Main, Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch, Marmalade, Fairpark, Glendale and Sprague. • February 21, 2024 – Staff report for Planning Commission hearing posted to Planning’s website. • February 28, 2024 – The Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council. • April 3, 2024 – Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office. • April 22, 2024 – Ordinance from the Attorney’s Office received by Planning Division. • May 2, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings) An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155. WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin Mendenhall to amend the zoning code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155); and WHEREAS, at its February 28, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.015.A. That Subsection 21A.10.015.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Engagement: Land Use Projects Subject to Public Engagement) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: A. Land Use Projects Subject to Public Engagement: The following are considered land use projects for purposes of this chapter and are subject to the public engagement process and requirements herein: 1. Request for an alley/street closure or vacation; 2. Amendments to Title 21A; 3. Conditional use applications; 2 4. Design review applications that are subject to review by the planning commission as provided in Chapter 21A.59; 5. Applications to demolish one or more landmark sites or contributing structures located within a local historic district; 6. Master plans, including amendments, to be adopted by the city council; 7. Requests for certificates of appropriateness required for new construction of principal structures, except for single family and two family dwellings; 8. Planned development applications that are subject to review by the planning commission as provided in Chapter 21A.55; and 9. Zoning map amendments. SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.020.B. That Subsection 21A.10.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Hearing Notice Requirements: Special Noticing Requirements for Certain Administrative Approvals) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: B. Special Noticing Requirements for Administrative Approvals: 1. Notice of Application for Design Review and Planned Development: a. Notification: At least twelve (12) days before a land use decision is made for an administrative design review application as authorized in Chapter 21A.59 of this title, or an administrative planned development as authorized by Chapter 21A.55 of this title, the planning director shall provide written notice to the following: (1) All owners and identifiable tenants of the subject property, land abutting the subject property, and land located directly across the street from the subject property. In identifying the owners and tenants of the land the city shall use the Salt Lake City geographic information system records. (2) Recognized community organization(s) in which the subject property is located. b. Contents of the Notice of Application: The notice shall generally describe the subject matter of the application, where the public may review the application, the expected date when the planning director will authorize a final land use decision, and the procedures to appeal the land use decision. c. End of Notification Period: If the planning director receives comments identifying concerns related to the design review application not complying with the requirements of Chapter 21A.59, or the planned development not complying with 3 the requirements of Chapter 21A.55, the planning director may refer the matter to the planning commission for their review and decision on the application. SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.S. That Subsection 21A.24.010.S of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Adaptive Reuse of a Landmark Building in Residential Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: S. Compliance with Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential zoning districts shall comply with Section 9.28.040, “Noises Prohibited.” SECTION 4. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.W. That Subsection 21A.24.010.W of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General Provisions: Compliance with Noise Regulations Required) shall be, and hereby is repealed in its entirety as follows: W. Compliance With Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential zoning districts shall comply with section 9.28.040, "Noises Prohibited", of this Code. SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.130.E.6. That Subsection 21A.24.010.E.6 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RMF- 35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District: Minimum Yard Requirements: Existing Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard shall be no greater than the established setback line of the existing building. 4 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.160.D. That Subsection 21A.24.160.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RB Residential/Business District: Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width) shall be, and hereby is amended only to eliminate the Land Use “A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail or office uses” from the table in said subsection, with no other changes to the table: Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail or office uses Included in principal use Included in principal use SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.180.I. That Subsection 21A.24.180.I of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RO Residential/Office District: Offices in Existing Buildings on Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand Square Feet) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: I. Offices in Existing Buildings on Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand Square Feet: Offices occupying existing buildings are permitted on a five thousand (5,000) square foot minimum lot. Additions to existing buildings that are greater than fifty percent (50%) of the existing building footprint or that exceed the height of the existing building shall be subject to design review (chapter 21A.59 of this title) unless the existing building is using the incentives in 21A.52.060. SECTION 8. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.26.010.K. That Subsection 21A.26.010.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Commercial Districts: General Provisions: Bed and Breakfast Establishments and Reception Centers in Landmark Sites in the CN Neighborhood Commercial and CB Community Business Districts) shall be, and hereby is repealed in its entirety as follows: 5 K. Bed And Breakfast Establishments And Reception Centers In Landmark Sites In The CN Neighborhood Commercial And CB Community Business Districts: 1. Conditional Use Required: Where not otherwise authorized by this title and after conditional use approval by the Planning Commission pursuant to chapter 21A.54 of this title, landmark sites in a CN or CB District may be used for a bed and breakfast establishment or reception center subject to the following standards: a. Standards: In addition to the standards for conditional uses, section 21A.54.080 of this title, the Planning Commission shall find the following: (1) The structure is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the City accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the designation and conditional use applications at the same time because of the risk of probable demolition; (2) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site; (3) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood; and (4) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the structure (if the structure is a residential structure), including mature landscaping. b. Condition Of Approval: A preservation easement in favor of the City shall be placed upon the landmark site. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling, multi-family” and “Mixed use development” and to repeal only the use category “Temporary use of closed schools and churches”, with no other changes to the table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as follows: Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 RB R-MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Adaptive reuse for additiona l uses in eligible buildings C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 Dwelling , multi- family P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P P P P P P P P P Mixed use develop ment P P P P P Temporar y use of closed schools and churches C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 6 7 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That the “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts of Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to notes “1”, “6”, “8” and “19” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 1. Reserved. 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review unless the building qualifies for the incentives in 21A.52.060. 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 19. Reserved. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be amended only as to the use category “Bed and breakfast” and to repeal only the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception centers in landmark sites”, with no other changes to the table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P 8 Bed and breakfast manor P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to note “3” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 3. Reserved. SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) is amended only to repeal the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception centers in landmark sites”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition 9 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 2 1A.24.010S of this title) P P P P P P P P Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010. S of this title) P P P P P P P P SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That Section 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse M-1 M-2 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That the “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing 10 Districts of Section 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to note “7” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 7. Reserved. SECTION 16. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 SECTION 17. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to note “4” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 4. Reserved. SECTION 18. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 11 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Use G-MU Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P SECTION 19. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be amended only for the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site” and “Dwelling: Multi-family”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG- 2 AG- 5 AG- 20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings C2 C2 C2 C2 P2 Dwelling: Multi- family P2 P2 P2 P P 12 13 SECTION 20. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That the “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts of Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to note “2” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. SECTION 21. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That Section 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling: Multi-family”, and “Reception center” and to repeal only the use categories “House museum in a landmark”, and “Office and/or reception center in a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings C9 Dwelling: Multi-family P9 P P P P House museum in landmark site P P P P P Office and/or Reception center in a landmark site P P P P Reception center P P P P 14 SECTION 22. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That the “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts of Section 21A.33.870 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended to add an additional note “9”, which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. SECTION 23. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.170. That Section 21A.36.170 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Reuse of Church and School Buildings) is hereby repealed in its entirety as follows: 21A.36.170: RESERVED SECTION 24. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.1 That Subsection 21A.44.060.A.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location and Design: Generally: Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this ordinance shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the building or use served, unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, "Off-Site Parking Permitted", or 21A.55.020, “Planned Developments – Authority”. SECTION 25. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.020. That Section 21A.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Applicability) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.52.020 APPLICABILITY: 15 A. This chapter applies as indicated within each subsection. B. The planned development process in Chapter 21A.55 is not required as indicated within this chapter. C. The administrative planned development process in Chapter 21A.55, and the administrative design review process in Chapter 21A.59 may be applicable as indicated within this chapter. SECTION 26. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.030. That Section 21A.52.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Relationship to Base Zoning District and Overlay Zoning Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.52.030: RELATIONSHIP TO BASE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS: Unless otherwise indicated in this chapter, all base zoning district or overlay zoning district standards and requirements take precedence. SECTION 27. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.040. That Section 21A.52.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Approval Process) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.52.040: APPROVAL PROCESS: Unless specifically exempted or modified by this chapter, all requirements of this title shall apply. A. Zoning Incentives: Applicants using the zoning incentives in this chapter shall submit a zoning incentives application and provide the following information: 1. The applicant's name, address, telephone number and interest in the property to which the incentives shall apply; 2. The owner's name, address and telephone number, if different than the applicant, and the owner's signed consent to the filing of the application; 3. The street address, tax parcel number and legal description of the subject property; 4. The zoning classification, zoning district boundaries and present use of the subject property; 5. The location of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, accessory and principal, showing the number of stories and height, dwelling type, if applicable, 16 major elevations and the total square footage of the floor area by proposed use and any additional information required for site plan review set forth in Chapter 21A.58; 6. The total number of dwelling units in the project, the number of affordable units, the number of bedrooms in the affordable units, the location of the affordable units, and level of affordability; 7. Any additional information required by Chapter 21A.59 design review or 21A.55 planned development, as applicable; and 8. Any additional information the zoning administrator deems necessary to demonstrate compliance with this chapter. B. Preliminary approval shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, a building permit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no permits shall be issued until final approval is obtained pursuant to this Chapter. Preliminary approval shall be valid for a period of one year unless complete building plans have been submitted to the Division of Building Services. C. Administrative design review and administrative planned development, where applicable, shall be exempt from the application fees and noticing fees otherwise required pursuant to Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55. D. Following the approval of any administrative design review or planned development application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the approved application unless a modification is approved subject to the process outlined in Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55, as applicable. E. Final approval shall occur following the recording of the restrictive covenant. F. Preliminary and final approvals shall be administrative approvals by the planning director or the planning director's designee. SECTION 28. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.A. That Subsection 21A.52.050.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable Housing Incentives: Purpose) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.52.050 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES: A. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section are intended to encourage the development of affordable housing. The provisions within this section are intended to facilitate the construction of affordable housing by allowing more inclusive development than would otherwise be permitted in the base zoning districts. Housing constructed using the incentives is intended to be compatible in form with the neighborhood and provide for safe and comfortable places to live and play. 17 SECTION 29. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3. That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 3. Incentives in the CB Community Business, CC Corridor Commercial, CG General Commercial, and I Institutional Zoning Districts: a. The following housing types: row houses, sideways row houses, and cottage developments are authorized. b. The minimum open space requirements in the I Institutional zoning district do not apply. c. To be eligible for the incentives listed in this subsection 3, a development shall meet the affordability requirements for Type C in Table 21A.52.050.G. SECTION 30. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.52. That Chapter 21A.52 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended to add a new Section 21A.52.060, with no other revisions to the chapter, to read as follows: 21A.52.060: BUILDING PRESERVATION INCENTIVES: The provisions in this section provide optional incentives to development projects that include the preservation of an existing building. The incentives located in Subsection 21A.52.060.A may be combined with the incentives outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. A. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings: 1. Purpose: To allow additional land uses in buildings that generally contribute to the character of the city so they can be redeveloped for economically viable uses. These buildings may be underutilized or have outlived their original use due to economic conditions, size of the building, a substantial degree of deterioration of the property, or other factors. Eligible buildings may hold historical or cultural significance or contribute to the existing neighborhood fabric through their architectural features, size, or previous use. 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to adaptive reuse of a building that meets the eligibility standards in 21A.52.060.A.3. 3. Eligibility Standards: a. The following buildings are eligible for the incentives in this subsection: 18 (1) Landmark Sites; (2) Buildings individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places; (3) Buildings designed and formerly used for schools, hospitals, places of worship, or other similar institutional uses; and (4) Buildings that the planning director has deemed significant based on the structure’s association with events that have contributed to broad patterns of history, association with lives of persons important in the city’s past, or displays distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. b. Exterior features that are important in defining the overall character of the building shall be retained. c. Exterior alterations to the eligible building shall meet the standards in 21A.34.020.G. d. The proposed use is conducive to the preservation of the building. e. A change of use to a residential use is not permitted in the OS (Open Space) zoning district. f.If the eligible building is located in a residential zoning district, and the existing use is residential, a change of use to nonresidential is not permitted. g. Properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay must obtain a Certificate of Appropriateness in accordance with 21A.34.020. 4. Incentives: a. Additional Uses: Unless prohibited by Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.a(1), any use may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use in zoning districts where Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings is listed in the land use tables in Chapter 21A.33, subject to the provisions in this subsection and any specific provisions applicable to the use in this title. Any conditional use shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards outlined in Chapter 21A.54. (1) Prohibited Uses: A change of use to one of the following uses is prohibited: Ambulance services (indoor and outdoor), amusement park, auditorium, bio- medical facility, bus line station/terminal, bus line yard and repair facility, car wash, check cashing/payday loan business, community correctional facility (large and small), contractor’s yard/office, drive-through facility associated with any use, equipment rental (indoor and outdoor), gas station, heliport, hotel/motel, impound lot, intermodal transit passenger hub, jail, large wind energy system, laundry and dry cleaning establishments, limousine service (large and small), heavy manufacturing, pet cemetery, recycling collection station, sexually oriented business, sign painting/fabrication, storage (outdoor), public storage (outdoor), wireless telecommunications facility, homeless resource centers, and any other uses that are only allowed in the manufacturing districts. b. Parking and Loading: The following are the minimum off-street parking and loading requirements for the eligible building. These minimums may be further reduced with the alternatives to minimum parking calculations in 21A.44.050. (1) Multi-Family: 0.5 off-street parking space per dwelling unit is required; 19 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces for the proposed use listed in the general context of the required off-street parking table in 21A.44 may be reduced by 40%; (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, no additional parking shall be required; (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements of the zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not apply. 5. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 21A.52.060.A shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run with the land for the duration of the adaptive reuse and shall provide for the following, without limitation: a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any conditions thereof; b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features important to the character of the building shall be preserved for the duration of the adaptive reuse or if subject to 21A.34.020, indefinitely unless otherwise permitted by the terms of a certificate of appropriateness; c. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the potential enforcement actions for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 6. Modifications to Approved Adaptive Reuse: Any modification to the use approved under these incentives requires a new zoning incentives application. Any new adaptive reuse shall also require a new zoning incentives application unless the new use is permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the zoning district. 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection A, or the restrictive covenant on the property as set forth in 21A.52.060.A.5, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for violations as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 21A.52.060.A.5, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. B. Preservation of a Principal Building: 1. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section are intended to encourage the preservation of buildings, supporting city goals related to sustainability, neighborhoods, economy, and housing. The provisions are designed to support 20 developments that include preserving an eligible building by allowing flexibility with certain zoning regulations while still maintaining the unique urban fabric and character of neighborhoods. 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to projects in all zoning districts that preserve an existing principal building that meets the eligibility standards in 21A.52.060.B.3. These incentives may be applied to existing principal buildings and new construction within the same development area. For the purposes of this subsection, the development area may include multiple abutting lots or parcels. 3. Eligibility Standards: a. Building Age: The existing building to be preserved shall be a minimum of 50 years old. b. Minimum Footprint of Eligible Building: The footprint of the eligible building to be preserved covers a minimum of 25% of the development area. A lower percentage may be considered by the planning director if the building has frontage on a public street, contains a publicly accessible use such as retail, restaurant, or entertainment, or would be highly visible from public spaces within the interior of the site. c. Retention of All Existing Principal Structures: In the FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R - 1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000, R-2, SR-1, SR-1A, SR-3, and all RMF zoning districts, all existing principal structures included in the overall development area shall be retained. d. Modifications to Existing Building: A maximum of 25% of each street facing building wall may be removed to accommodate modifications or additions. No more than 50% of the building’s exterior walls may be removed. Portions of a building wall with character defining architectural features shall not be removed. e. Retention of Existing Active Commercial Uses: Eligible buildings with existing active commercial uses with ground level street frontage are subject to the following requirements. For the purpose of this subsection, active commercial uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent to a building and encourage pedestrian activity and walk-in traffic. Active uses may include retail goods/service establishments, restaurants, bars, art and craft studios, or other uses determined to be substantially similar in terms of activation by the planning director. (1) A minimum of 50% of the length shall be retained along the street frontage in the existing building or be included as part of the new development. If included in the new development, the active commercial use shall have the primary entrance on the street frontage with direct public access from the street frontage. (2) The existing depth of the active commercial use shall be maintained or a minimum depth of 25 feet, whichever is less. (3) These requirements do not apply to nonconforming active commercial uses with ground level street frontage. 4. Incentives: 21 a. Planned Development Waived: A planned development is not required for the following: (1) More Than One Principal Building Per Lot: More than one principal building per lot is allowed without having frontage along a public street. (2) Lots without Frontage on a Public Street: Lots do not require frontage on a public street if necessary cross access easements are provided. b. Administrative Planned Development: The following are authorized through an administrative planned development pursuant to the procedures and standards in Chapter 21A.55. The minimum planned development size required by 21A.55.060 does not apply: (1) Modification to the minimum yard requirements. (2) Modification to the open space and landscaping requirements when the modification specifically relates to preserving the existing building(s). (3) Modifications to the provisions for awnings and canopies, balconies, patios, and porches in Table 21A.36.020.B, Obstructions in Required Yards. (4) Modifications to the parking location and setback requirements in Table 21A.44.060.A. (5) Parking within the boundary of a planned development area but located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is allowed and is not considered off-site parking. The parking must only serve the uses within the planned development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions of this title. c. Minimum Lot Area, Width & Coverage: (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot width tables of the zoning district does not apply. (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot width tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning districts: FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. (3) RMF-30 zoning district: The minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not apply. (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the individual lot or parcel within the development area. d. Height: Additional building height is authorized in zoning districts as indicated in the following sections through administrative design review. The maximum height per story of the additional building height incentive shall not exceed 12 feet. Administrative design review shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards in Chapter 21A.59. The additional height authorized by this subsection shall not be combined with the additional height authorized by Subsection 21A.52.050, Affordable Housing Incentives. (1) Residential districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive RMU-35 45’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RMU-45 55’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 22 RMU 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RO 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. (2) Commercial Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive CB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CN May build one additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CC 45’ CG 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building for properties in the boundary described in 21A.26.070.G. CSHBD1 105’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CSHBD2 60’ and 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Transition 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Core 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. (3) Form-based districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 90’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-MU11 125’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN2 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. 23 FB-SC 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SE 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN1 3 stories and 30’ in height. (4) Downtown districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive D-2 120’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. D-3 180’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. (5) Other districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive GMU 180’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. MU 60’ provided that the additional height is for residential uses only. I Building heights in excess of 35' but not more than 75' provided, that for each foot of height over 35', each required yard shall be increased 1'. UI Building heights in excess of 75' but not more 120' provided that the additional height is supported by the master plan and compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. OS – Lots greater than 4 acres Building heights in excess of 45’ up to 60’ provided that for each foot of height over 45’, each required yard and landscaped yard shall be increased by 1’. e. Administrative design review is permitted for the following: (1) Buildings in the CSHBD1 or CSHBD2 zoning district that exceed 20,000 square feet in size. (2) Buildings in the CB zoning district that exceed 7,500 gross square feet of floor area for a first-floor footprint or in excess of 15,000 gross square feet floor area. 24 f. Parking: The following are the minimum off-street parking requirements unless a lesser requirement is listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44. These minimums may be further reduced with the alternatives to minimum parking calculations in 21A.44.050. (1) Residential: 0.5 space per dwelling unit for multi-family; 1 space per dwelling unit for all other residential uses. (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces for the proposed use listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44 may be reduced by 40%. (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, no additional parking shall be required. (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. g. Minimum Required Yards: The minimum required yards may apply to the perimeter of the development area and not to the individual lot or parcel within the development area. 5. Design Standards for New Construction: Unless a stricter design standard related to each of the following is included in the base zone or Chapter 21A.37, the following design standards are required for all zones except single and two-family zoning districts: a. Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, 50% of any street facing facade shall be clad in durable materials. Durable materials include stone, brick, masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials may be used for the remainder of the facade facing the street. Other materials proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is appropriate for the proposed location on the building. b. Ground Floor Glass: The surface area of the ground floor of a street facing façade shall contain a minimum percentage of glass as indicated below, calculated between 3 feet and 8 feet above grade. All ground floor glass shall allow unhampered and unobstructed visibility into the building for a depth of at least 5 feet, excluding any glass etching and window signs when installed and permitted in accordance with Chapter 21A.46, "Signs", of this title. (1) Nonresidential Uses: 50% ground floor glass (2) Residential Uses: If the ground level of the building is occupied by residential uses that face the street, the minimum glass requirement is 20%. c. Upper Floor Glass: The surface area of the façade of each street facing floor above the ground floor must contain a minimum of 20% glass. d. Maximum Length of a Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall uninterrupted by windows or doors at the ground floor level along any street facing façade is 15 feet. Emergency exit doors and doors to access structured parking or utility equipment shall not count as an interruption. 25 e. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: (1) The maximum length of each street facing building facade shall not exceed 100 feet in the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 districts. (2) The maximum length of each street facing building façade shall not exceed 175 feet in all other zoning districts. f. Building Entrances: A building entrance that provides direct access to the use with a walkway connected to the public sidewalk is required for each ground floor street facing façade as follows: (1) Single Family Attached: All units abutting a street shall have the primary entrance on the street. (2) Multi-family: At least one building entrance is required for each street facing façade. Additional building entrances shall be required every 75 feet. (3) Unless the base zone of the property has specific entry feature requirements, all required residential building entries shall have an unenclosed entry porch, portico, awning or canopy, or emphasized doorway entry feature as described in 21A.37.050.P. The entry feature may encroach in the front yard setback, but the encroachment shall not be closer than 5 feet from the front property line. (4) Nonresidential Uses: At least one building entrance is required for each street facing façade. Additional building entrances shall be required every 40 feet. g. Garage Doors Facing Street: Garage doors are prohibited on the façade of the building that is parallel to, or located along, a public street. h. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020B, “Obstructions In Required Yards”. 6. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 21A.52.060.B shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any conditions thereof; b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features important to the character of the building shall be preserved during the term; c. Projects that apply the incentives to new buildings on the development site shall guarantee retention of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives for a minimum term of 30 years or, if the eligible building is subject to 21A.34.020, indefinitely unless otherwise permitted by the terms of a certificate of appropriateness after such 30 year period; d. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the city’s potential remedies for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 26 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection B, or the restrictive covenant on the property as set forth in 21A.52.060.B.6, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for violations as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 21A.52.060.B.6, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.B. Financial remedies for a violation of the covenant may include liquidated damages representing a reasonable estimate of the value of the incentives, plus other associated damages valued up to 20% of the tax assessed value of the preserved building over the three preceding years. SECTION 31. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.020. That Section 21A.55.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Authority) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.020: AUTHORITY: A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny, or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific zoning standards outlined in 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying provisions in 21A.52.060.B in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is located. B. Planning Commission Review: The planning commission may approve planned developments for uses listed in the tables of permitted and conditional uses for each category of zoning district or districts. The approval shall be in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is located. In approving a planned development, the planning commission may change, alter, modify or waive the following provisions of this title: 1. Zoning and Subdivision Regulations: Any provisions of this title or of the city's subdivision regulations as they apply to the proposed planned development except that the planning commission cannot approve a use that is not allowed in the zoning district in which the planned development is located. 2. Off-Site Parking: Parking within the boundary of a planned development area, but located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is allowed and not considered off-site parking. The parking must only serve the uses within the planned development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions of this title. 27 3. Building Height: Up to five feet (5') of additional building height, except in the FR, R-1, SR, or R-2 zoning districts where additional building height cannot be approved through the planned development process. 4. Density: Residential planned developments shall not exceed the density limitation of the zoning district where the planned development is proposed except as allowed below. The calculation of planned development density may include open space that is provided as an amenity to the planned development. Public streets located within or adjacent to a planned development shall not be included in the planned development area for the purpose of calculating density. a. In the RMF zoning districts and on lots 0.20 acres or more in size, developments that change a nonconforming commercial use to a residential use that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density limitations of the zoning district when approved as a planned development. SECTION 32. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.030. That Section 21A.55.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Planning Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.030: DECISION: A. No Presumption of Approval: A request for a planned development does not constitute an assurance or presumption that such planned development will be approved. Rather, each proposed planned development shall be evaluated on an individual basis, in relation to its compliance with the standards and factors set forth in this chapter and with the standards for the zoning district in which it is located, in order to determine whether the planned development is appropriate at a particular location. B. Approval: The planning commission or planning director in the case of administrative planned developments, may approve a planned development as proposed or may impose conditions necessary or appropriate for the planned development to comply with the standards and factors set forth in this chapter. C. Denial: The planning commission or planning director in the case of administrative planned developments, may deny an application for a planned development if it finds that the proposal does not meet the intent of the base zoning district, does not meet the purpose of this chapter, or is not consistent with the standards and factors as set forth in this chapter. 28 SECTION 33. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.040. That Section 21A.55.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Procedures) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.040: PROCEDURES: A. Application: An application for a planned development shall be made on an application form prepared by the zoning administrator and accompanied by applicable fees as noted in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible for payment of all mailing fees established for required public noticing. A complete application shall contain at least the following information submitted by the applicant, unless certain information is determined by the zoning administrator to be inapplicable or unnecessary to appropriately evaluate the application: 1. A complete description of the proposed planned development including the zoning regulations being modified in the planned development and the planning objectives being met; 2. When the proposed planned development includes provisions for common open space or recreational facilities, a statement describing the provision to be made for the care and maintenance of such open space or recreational facilities; 3. A written statement with supporting graphics showing how the proposed planned development is compatible with other property in the neighborhood; 4. Plans, as required pursuant to Section 21A.58.060 of this title, with the exception of the number of copies required; 5. Architectural graphics including floor plans, elevations, profiles and cross sections; 6. A preliminary subdivision plat, if required; 7. Traffic impact analysis, where required by the City Transportation Division; and 8. Other information or documentation the zoning administrator may deem necessary for proper review and analysis of a particular application. B. Determination of Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a planned development, the zoning administrator shall make a determination of completeness of the application pursuant to Section 21A.10.010 of this title. C. Public Notification and Engagement: 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an application that qualifies for administrative review, the planning director shall provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10.020.B. 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: a. Applications subject to planning commission review are subject to the notification requirements of Chapter 2.60. 29 b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements found in Chapter 21A.10. SECTION 34. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.050. That Section 21A.55.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Standards for Planned Developments) shall be, and hereby is amended, as to the preamble only with Subsections A through G unchanged: 21A.55.050: STANDARDS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: The planning commission, or the planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a planned development based upon written findings of fact according to each of the following standards. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide written and graphic evidence demonstrating compliance with the following standards: SECTION 35. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.070. That Section 21A.55.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Appeal of the Planning Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.070: APPEAL OF THE DECISION: Any person adversely affected by a final decision of the planning commission or planning director in the case of administrative planned developments, may appeal to the appeals hearing officer in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.16 of this title. The filing of the appeal shall not stay the pending the outcome of the appeal, except as provided for under Section 21A.16.030F of this title. SECTION 36. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.080. That Section 21A.55.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Time Limit on Approved Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.080: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 30 No planned development approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless a building permit has been issued or complete building plans have been submitted to the Division of Building Services and Licensing. The planning commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, may grant an extension of a planned development for up to one additional year when the applicant is able to demonstrate no change in circumstance that would result in an unmitigated impact. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the expiration of the planned development approval. SECTION 37. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.090. That Section 21A.55.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Effect of Approval of Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.090: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: The approval of a proposed planned development by the planning commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall not authorize the establishment or extension of any use nor the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of any building or structure, but shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications for any permits or approvals that may be required by the regulations of the city, including, but not limited to, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy and subdivision approval. SECTION 38. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.100. That Section 21A.55.100 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Modifications to Development Plan) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.100: MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Following planned development approval, the development plan approved by the planning commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall constitute the site design in relation to building placement and design, landscaping, mobility and circulation elements, and any elements that were approved as zoning modifications through the planned development process. Modifications to the development plan may be allowed pursuant to this section. A. New Application Required for Modifications and Amendments: Modifications or amendments shall be subject to the provisions of this section. 31 B. Minor Modifications: The planning director may authorize minor modifications to the approved development plan when such modifications appear necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations necessary to comply with an adopted building, fire, or engineering code or standard or when the modification complies with the applicable standards in the underlying zoning district or overlay district. Such minor modifications shall be limited to the following elements: 1. Adjusting the distance as shown on the approved development plan between any one structure or group of structures, and any other structure or group of structures, or any vehicular circulation element; 2. Adjusting the location of any open space; 3. Adjusting any final grade; 4. Altering the types of landscaping elements and their arrangement within the required landscaping buffer area; 5. Signs; 6. Relocation or construction of accessory structures that comply with the provisions of 21A.40 and any applicable accessory structure regulations; or 7. Additions which comply with the lot and bulk requirements of the underlying zone. Such minor modifications shall be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title and the development plan as approved pursuant to this chapter and shall be the minimum necessary to comply with the standards of the underlying zoning district or the applicable building, fire, or engineering code or standard. A minor modification shall not be approved if the modification reduces a required building setback, authorizes an increase in lot coverage, or increases building height. C. Major Modifications: Any modifications to the approved development plan not authorized by Subsection B shall be considered to be a major modification. The planning commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall give notice to all property owners consistent with notification requirements located in chapter 21A.10 of this title. The planning commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, may approve an application for a major modification to the approved development plan, not requiring a modification of written conditions of approval or recorded easements, upon finding that any changes in the plan as approved will be in substantial conformity with the approved development plan. If the commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, determines that a major modification is not in substantial conformity with the approved development plan, then the commission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall review the request in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. 32 D. Other Modifications: Any modification to the planned development that complies with the standards of the underlying zoning district or overlay zoning district is allowed provided the modification does not violate a condition of approval or other requirement placed on the planned development as part of the approval of the application and required permits and approvals are obtained. SECTION 39. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.59.020.A. That Subsection 21A.59.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Review: Authority: Administrative Review) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized elsewhere in this title. 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review objectives. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the 33 request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. SECTION 40. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: a. Amending the definition of “ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A LANDMARK BUILDING.” That the definition shall be amended to read as follows: ADAPTIVE REUSE FOR ADDITTIONAL USES IN ELIGIBLE BUILDINGS: Other land uses, in addition to those specifically listed in the land use tables, may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use subject to the provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.A. b. Amending the definition of “PARKING, OFF SITE.” That the definition of “PARKING, OFF SITE” shall be amended to read as follows: PARKING, OFF SITE: An off-street parking area intended to serve one or more uses and that is located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve. Parking approved within the boundary of a planned development that only serves uses within the planned development area is not considered off-site parking. c. Repealing the definition “HOUSE MUSEUM IN A LANDMARK SITE” as follows: HOUSE MUSEUM IN LANDMARK SITE: A dwelling unit which is converted from its original principal use as a dwelling unit to a staffed institution dedicated to educational, aesthetic or historic purposes. Such museum should include a staff who commands an appropriate body of special knowledge necessary to convey the historical, aesthetic or architectural attributes of the building and its collections to the general public. Such staff should also have the ability to reach museological decisions consonant with the experience of his or her peers and have access to and acquaintance with the literature of the field. Such museum should maintain either regular hours or be available for appointed visits such that access is reasonably convenient to the public. SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. 34 __________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Adaptive Reuse Preservation Incentives_Opt2(final)v2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: June 13, 2024 By: _ K _ Attorney _______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Jill Love 05/23/2024 Jill Love (May 23, 2024 16:27 MDT)Date Received: Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 05/23/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 05/02/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT: Text Amendment - Zoning Incentives for Adaptive Reuse and Preservation of Buildings STAFF CONTACT: Amy Thompson, Planning Manager amy.thompson@slcgov.com or 801-535-7281 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a petition that was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to make changes to the zoning ordinance to both encourage and support the adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings. As the Salt Lake Valley continues to grow, the City’s older neighborhoods and buildings face increasing pressure for redevelopment, presenting both challenges and opportunities. This proposal addresses barriers that currently prevent the reuse of existing buildings and introduces incentives into the zoning ordinance to encourage buildings to be retained rather than demolished. The proposed amendments would apply citywide. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Preservation of a Principal Building – 21A.52.060.B (“B Incentives”) To assist in developing the amendments, planning staff conducted research on several cities that have adopted ordinances that offer incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of existing buildings. Key features that were researched include location of the program (certain neighborhoods, specific zones, etc.), eligibility criteria, goals, and the types of incentives offered. Additionally, a focus group was created to help staff better understand current challenges and barriers to utilizing existing buildings. The focus group was largely made up of architects and developers, some of which have specific experience with these types of projects. Additionally, staff worked closely with the City’s Sustainability Division and Economic Development/Business Development on the proposal. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: The proposed ordinance changes would be in Chapter 21A.52, Zoning Incentives. The proposal creates a new section within that chapter, “Building Preservation Incentives”, which is separated into two sub- sections, “Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings” (21A.52.060.A), and “Preservation of a Principal Building” (21A.52.060.B). Each sub-section is discussed in greater detail below. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings – 21A.52.060.A (“A Incentives”) The “A Incentives” are primarily a use incentive to allow for flexibility of uses in eligible buildings, which usually include buildings that hold high artistic, historic, or cultural value, or large underutilized structures that are part of the neighborhood fabric. The current zoning ordinance for adaptive reuse of a landmark site allows nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential zoning district, subject to meeting standards related to preserving building character and neighborhood compatibility. The proposed ordinance expands on this current process with the following changes: •Broadens eligibility to include buildings that are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places, buildings formerly used for churches, schools, or hospitals, and other culturally or historically significant buildings. •Allows residential uses in addition to the nonresidential uses already allowed through this process. Additionally, the proposal would allow for residential uses in eligible buildings in the Public Lands (PL) and Institutional (I) zones where the only residential use currently allowed is living quarters for a caretaker or security guard. •Prohibit certain uses. Impactful uses were identified as prohibited because of their potential for negative impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and to the eligible building. •Removes minimum square footage requirement. The current building square footage minimum of 7,000 square feet is a significant obstacle to qualify for adaptive reuse incentives. The “B Incentives” apply to the eligible building being preserved and can also apply to any new construction on the same development site. In contrast to the “A Incentives,” this incentive is not a use incentive; these “B Incentives” are zoning modifications to the base zoning requirements for uses allowed in the zone. Projects that utilize the incentives in this subsection will be required to adhere to specific design standards for the new construction, retain existing active commercial uses on site, and enter into a restrictive covenant ensuring the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives is retained for at least 30 years. Eligibility: The “B Incentives” apply to new development projects that preserve a building that is at least 50 years old and covers a minimum of 25% of the development site; a lower percentage may be considered in certain circumstances. Summary of “B Incentives” •Removes the planned development requirement for modifications that are commonly requested through this process but are generally straightforward such as creating lots without street frontage and having buildings on the same parcel without all buildings having public street frontage. •Includes the addition of an Administrative Planned Development process for certain zoning modifications to allow for a more streamlined review process for eligible projects. •Removes minimum lot area and width requirements for all zones except single family zoning districts. •Includes additional building height in various zoning districts through administrative design review. Currently, there is no height incentive being offered in the single, two-family and RMF zoning districts. •Reduces parking for eligible projects. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL Both the Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission held public hearings to review the proposed text amendment and unanimously forwarded a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council. Following these recommendations, staff identified the following for Council consideration. •“B Incentive” Building Age Eligibility – The draft ordinance presented at the public hearings includes language that eligible buildings must be a minimum of 50 years old. Some planning commissioners expressed concerns with a rolling date and the ability for later period buildings (1980’s/1990’s) to become eligible for the incentives in the near future – typically, the development pattern of later eras may not be something worth preserving. Instead of the eligibility language “at least 50 years old,” the council could consider fixed date language that requires eligible buildings to be built prior to 1976. •Design Standards for New Construction Utilizing the “B Incentives” – Unless a stricter design standard is required in the Design Standards chapter for the zoning district the property is located in, projects utilizing the incentives have to meet specific design standards outlined in the proposed ordinance. Staff is recommending some additional changes to the following design standards in the proposal: o Upper Floor Glass – The draft ordinance reviewed by the planning commission requires the surface area of the facade of each floor to contain a minimum of 50% glass, which can be reduced on the ground level for residential uses to 25%. After looking at this closer, staff is of the opinion that the 50% threshold is too high for the upper levels of the building. Currently, only the Downtown zones and the Gateway Mixed Use (GMU) zones have an upper-level glass requirement of 50% and it is difficult for projects in those zones to meet the existing requirement without a request for a design review modification. The CG zone requires 25%, the FB-UN and RMF-30 zones require 15%, and the rest of the zones do not have an upper floor glass requirement. Staff is recommending reducing the upper floor glazing requirement to 20% for projects that use the incentives. Zones that have a higher % requirement in the Design Standards Chapter (21A.37) will still be subject to the higher standard. Staff is also recommending adding some clarifying language, so the glass requirements are consistent with the design standards chapter regarding the location of ground floor glass (between 3-8 FT on the building) and unobstructed visibility into the space. o Building Entrances – Added language to the building entrances design standard to address that entry features (un-enclosed entry porch, portico, awning or canopy, or emphasized doorway) for required building entrances need to meet the description in 21A.37.050.P for these entry features. The above recommendations are reflected in ordinance version 2 if the Council decides they would like these changes incorporated. If the Council does not want these changes incorporated, they have been left out of ordinance version 1. PUBLIC PROCESS: Open House: On April 17, 2023, a virtual open house page was created on Planning’s website and published via listserv. The initial information provided an introduction to the proposal to gather feedback early on in the process, and information was continually updated with revised draft ordinances and updated information throughout the process. Initial Outreach: On April 20, 2023, all Salt Lake City recognized organizations, focus group members, and stakeholders, were sent initial information for the purpose of gathering early feedback to inform the draft ordinance. Recognized Organizations: On July 18, 2023, the required 45-day notice and draft ordinance was sent to all recognized organizations for feedback. Community Council Meetings: On August 21, 2023, at the request of the chair, staff attended the Sugar House Land Use Committee meeting to discuss the proposed text amendment and answer any questions from the community. Comments Received: •Comments from Recognized Organizations: The East Liberty Park Community Organization & and the Sugar House Community Council provided letters in support of the proposal. The Sugar House Community Council did express concerns with reducing parking as an incentive. •Public Comments: Staff received four public comments in support of the proposal. Historic Landmark Commission Public Hearing: On November 2, 2023, the Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. No one spoke during the public hearing. Planning Commission Public Hearing: On February 28, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. One person spoke in favor of the proposal at the public hearing. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION (HLC) RECORDS (click each item to access): Briefing - August 3, 2023: •HLC Agenda •HLC Briefing Memo •HLC Minutes Public Hearing - November 2, 2023: •HLC Agenda •HLC Staff Report •HLC Minutes •HLC Meeting Video PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) RECORDS (click each item to access): Briefing – September 27, 2023 •PC Agenda •PC Briefing Memo •PC Minutes •PC Meeting Video Public Hearing – February 28, 2024 •PC Agenda •PC Staff Report •PC Minutes •PC Meeting Video EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance - Version 2 2) Ordinance – Version 1 3) Project Chronology 4) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 5) Petition Initiation 6) Public Comments Received After Publication of the Staff Report 1.ORDINANCE (VERSION 2) LEGISLATIVE 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings) 6 7 An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City 8 Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings pursuant to 9 Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155. 10 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning 11 Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin 12 Mendenhall to amend the zoning code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and 13 preservation of buildings (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155); and 14 WHEREAS, at its February 28, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 15 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.015.A. That 21 Subsection 21A.10.015.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 22 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Engagement: Land Use Projects Subject to 23 Public Engagement) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 24 A. Land Use Projects Subject to Public Engagement: The following are considered land use 25 projects for purposes of this chapter and are subject to the public engagement process and 26 requirements herein: 27 28 1. Request for an alley/street closure or vacation; 29 2. Amendments to Title 21A; 30 3. Conditional use applications; LEGISLATIVE 2 31 4. Design review applications, that are subject to review by the planning commission as 32 provided in Chapter 21A.59; 33 5. Applications to demolish one or more landmark sites or contributing structures 34 located within a local historic district; 35 6. Master plans, including amendments, to be adopted by the city council; 36 7. Requests for certificates of appropriateness required for new construction of principal 37 structures, except for single family and two family dwellings; 38 8. Planned development applications that are subject to review by the planning 39 commission as provided in Chapter 21A.55; and 40 9. Zoning map amendments. 41 42 43 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.020.B. That 44 Subsection 21A.10.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 45 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Hearing Notice Requirements: Special 46 Noticing Requirements for Certain Administrative Approvals) shall be, and hereby is amended to 47 read as follows: 48 B. Special Noticing Requirements for Administrative Approvals: 49 50 1. Notice of Application for Design Review and Planned Development: 51 52 a. Notification: At least twelve (12) days before a land use decision is made for an 53 administrative design review application as authorized in Chapter 21A.59 of this 54 title, or an administrative planned development as authorized by Chapter 21A.55 55 of this title, the planning director shall provide written notice to the following: 56 (1) All owners and identifiable tenants of the subject property, land abutting the 57 subject property, and land located directly across the street from the subject 58 property. In identifying the owners and tenants of the land the city shall use 59 the Salt Lake City geographic information system records. 60 (2) Recognized community organization(s) in which the subject property is 61 located. 62 63 b. Contents of the Notice of Application: The notice shall generally describe the 64 subject matter of the application, where the public may review the application, the 65 expected date when the planning director will authorize a final land use decision, 66 and the procedures to appeal the land use decision. 67 68 c. End of Notification Period: If the planning director receives comments identifying 69 concerns related to the design review application not complying with the 70 requirements of Chapter 21A.59, or the planned development not complying with LEGISLATIVE 3 71 the requirements of Chapter 21A.55, the planning director may refer the matter to 72 the planning commission for their review and decision on the application. 73 74 75 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.S. That 76 Subsection 21A.24.010.S of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 77 Provisions: Adaptive Reuse of a Landmark Building in Residential Districts) shall be, and hereby 78 is amended to read as follows: 79 80 S. Compliance with Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential zoning 81 districts shall comply with Section 9.28.040, “Noises Prohibited.”Adaptive Reuse Of A 82 Landmark Building In Residential Districts: 83 1. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the adaptive reuse of a landmark site in a residential 84 district is to preserve landmark sites as defined in subsection 21A.34.020B of this title. In some 85 instances these sites have outlived their original use due to economic conditions, size of the 86 building, and/or a substantial degree of deterioration of the historic property. Such sites, 87 however, still contribute to the welfare, property and education of the people of Salt Lake City 88 because of their historic, architectural or cultural significance. The Planning Commission shall 89 consider the allowance of a nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential district 90 according to the qualifying provisions outlined in subsection S2a of this section and pursuant 91 to chapter 21A.54 of this title, in order to ensure that the residential character of the surrounding 92 environment is preserved. 93 2. Conditional Use Required: Where authorized by this title as shown in 94 section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of 95 this title, landmark sites in any residential district may be used for certain nonresidential uses. 96 a. Qualifying Provisions: In order to qualify for conditional use review by the 97 Planning Commission under section 21A.54.080, "Standards For Conditional Uses", of 98 this title, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with the following: 99 (1) The building is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City 100 register of cultural resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the 101 City accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 102 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the designation 103 and conditional use applications together. 104 (2) The landmark building shall have a minimum of seven thousand (7,000) 105 square feet of floor area, excluding accessory buildings. 106 (3) The new use will require minimal change as these features are important 107 in defining the overall historic character of the building and environment. 108 (4) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site. LEGISLATIVE 4 109 (5) Significant archaeological resources affected by the project shall be 110 protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures 111 shall be undertaken. 112 (6) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. 113 (7) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of 114 craftsmanship that characterize the property shall be preserved. 115 (8) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 116 structure or site including mature landscaping. 117 (9) The change in use from residential to nonresidential is necessary due to 118 the excessive size of the landmark site for residential uses allowed in the residential 119 district, and/or demonstration that the building cannot reasonably be used for its 120 original intended use. 121 (10) The proposed use will not have a material net cumulative adverse 122 impact on the neighborhood or the City as a whole by considering the following: 123 (A) The spatial distribution of: 124 (i) Business licenses issued for properties located within three 125 hundred feet (300') of any property line and the block frontage on both sides 126 of the street between 100 series addresses; and 127 (ii) Previously approved conditional uses for nonresidential uses 128 in landmark sites within the same planning community, as shown on a map of 129 planning communities maintained by the Zoning Administrator. 130 (B) Impacts on neighboring properties including, but not limited to: 131 (i) Traffic; 132 (ii) Parking; 133 (iii) Signs; 134 (iv) Lighting; 135 (v) Removal of landscaping; and 136 (vi) For the purposes of evaluating subsections S2a(10)(B)(i) 137 through S2a(10)(B)(v) of this section, professionally prepared impact studies 138 shall not be required unless specifically requested by the Zoning 139 Administrator; 140 (vii) Noise, fumes or odors; 141 b. Credit For On Street Parking: Some or all of the off street parking spaces 142 required in section 21A.44.030 of this title may be met by the provision of on street 143 spaces. Such credit shall require the site plan review approval. Requests for on street 144 parking shall meet the following requirements: LEGISLATIVE 5 145 (1) All on street parking facilities shall be designed in conformance with the 146 standards established by the City Transportation Engineer; 147 (2) Prior to approving any requests for on street parking, the development 148 review team shall determine that the proposed on street parking will not materially 149 adversely impact traffic movements and related public street functions; and 150 (3) Credit for on street parking shall be limited to the number of spaces 151 provided along the street frontage adjacent to the use. 152 153 SECTION 4. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.W. That 154 Subsection 21A.24.010.W of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 155 Provisions: Compliance with Noise Regulations Required) shall be, and hereby is repealed in its 156 entirety as follows: 157 158 W. Compliance With Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential 159 zoning districts shall comply with section 9.28.040, "Noises Prohibited", of this Code. 160 161 SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.130.E.6. 162 That Subsection 21A.24.010.E.6 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RMF- 163 35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District: Minimum Yard Requirements: Existing 164 Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 165 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard 166 shall be no greater than the established setback line of the existing building unless the 167 proposed yard encroachment is to accommodate additional units. New principal 168 buildings must conform to current yard area requirements, unless the new principal 169 two-family dwelling or twin home has legal conforming status as outlined in 170 section 21A.38.070 of this title. 171 172 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.160.D. That 173 Subsection 21A.24.160.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RB 174 Residential/Business District: Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width) shall be, and hereby is LEGISLATIVE 6 175 amended only to eliminate the Land Use “A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail 176 or office uses” from the table in said subsection, with no other changes to the table: 177 178 179 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.180.I. That 180 Subsection 21A.24.180.I of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RO 181 Residential/Office District: Offices in Existing Buildings on Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand 182 Square Feet) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 183 I. Offices iIn Existing Buildings oOn Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand Square Feet: 184 Offices occupying existing buildings are permitted on a five thousand (5,000) square foot 185 minimum lot. Additions to existing buildings that are greater than fifty percent (50%) of 186 the existing building footprint or that exceed the height of the existing building shall be 187 subject to design review (chapter 21A.59 of this title) unless the existing building is using 188 the incentives in 21A.52.060. 189 190 SECTION 8. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.26.010.K. That 191 Subsection 21A.26.010.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Commercial Districts: General 192 Provisions: Bed and Breakfast Establishments and Reception Centers in Landmark Sites in the 193 CN Neighborhood Commercial and CB Community Business Districts) shall be, and hereby is 194 repealed in its entirety as follows: 195 196 K. Bed And Breakfast Establishments And Reception Centers In Landmark Sites In The CN 197 Neighborhood Commercial And CB Community Business Districts: 198 1. Conditional Use Required: Where not otherwise authorized by this title and after 199 conditional use approval by the Planning Commission pursuant to chapter 21A.54 of this Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail or office uses Included in principal use Included in principal use LEGISLATIVE 7 200 title, landmark sites in a CN or CB District may be used for a bed and breakfast 201 establishment or reception center subject to the following standards: 202 a. Standards: In addition to the standards for conditional uses, section 21A.54.080 of 203 this title, the Planning Commission shall find the following: 204 (1) The structure is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City Register of 205 Cultural Resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the City 206 accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 207 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the 208 designation and conditional use applications at the same time because of the risk 209 of probable demolition; 210 (2) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site; 211 (3) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood; and 212 (4) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 213 structure (if the structure is a residential structure), including mature landscaping. 214 b. Condition Of Approval: A preservation easement in favor of the City shall be placed 215 upon the landmark site. 216 217 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 218 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 219 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 220 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling, multi-family” and “Mixed use development” and to repeal 221 only the use category “Temporary use of closed schools and churches”, with no other changes to the 222 table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as follows: 8 223 Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 RB R-MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Adaptive reuse for additiona l uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P86 Dwelling , multi- family P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P P P P P P P P P Mixed use develop ment P1 P P P P Temporar y use of closed schools and churches C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 224 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 9 225 226 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That the 227 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 228 Districts of Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 229 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 230 notes “1”, “6”, “8” and “19” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as 231 follows: 232 1. Reserved. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 233 234 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 235 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the 236 building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review 237 unless the building qualifies for the incentives in 21A.52.060. 238 239 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSubsection 21A.52.060.A 21A.24.010S 240 of this title. 241 242 19. Reserved. Subject to section 21A.36.170 of this title. 243 244 245 246 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 247 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 248 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be amended only as to the use category “Bed and 249 breakfast” and to repeal only the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House 250 museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception centers in landmark sites”, with no other 251 changes to the table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as 252 follows: 253 254 255 Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District LEGISLATIVE 10 CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P Bed and breakfast manor C3 C3 P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C 257 258 259 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 260 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial 261 Districts of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 262 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 263 note “3” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 264 3. Reserved. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City register of cultural 265 resources (see subsections 21A.26.010S and 21A.26.010K of this title). 266 267 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 268 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 269 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) is amended only to repeal the use categories 270 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception 271 centers in landmark sites”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area 272 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: LEGISLATIVE 11 273 Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Use Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 2 1A.24.010S of this title) P P P P P P P P Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010. S of this title) P P P P P P P P 274 275 276 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That Section 277 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 278 Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 279 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for 280 Manufacturing Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse M-1 M-2 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7 281 LEGISLATIVE 12 282 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That the 283 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing 284 Districts of Section 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 285 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as 286 to note “7” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 287 7. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 288 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent 289 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 290 review. 291 292 SECTION 16. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 293 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 294 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 295 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 296 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 298 299 SECTION 17. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 300 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 301 Districts of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 302 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 303 note “4” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 304 4. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 305 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent LEGISLATIVE 13 306 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 307 review (chapter 21A.59 of this title). 308 309 SECTION 18. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 310 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 311 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 312 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway 313 District, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Use G-MU Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P 314 315 SECTION 19. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 316 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 317 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be amended only for the use categories 318 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site” and “Dwelling: Multi-family”, in the Table of Permitted and 319 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 14 320 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG- 2 AG- 5 AG- 20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C2 C2 C2 C2 P2 P2 Dwelling: Multi- family P2 P2 P2 P P 321 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 15 322 323 SECTION 20. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That the 324 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose 325 Districts of Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 326 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only 327 as to note “2” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 328 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. When located 329 in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 330 331 SECTION 21. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That Section 332 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 333 Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 334 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling: Multi-family”, and “Reception center” and to repeal only the 335 use categories “House museum in a landmark”, and “Office and/or reception center in a landmark 336 site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts, with no other changes 337 to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible of a landmark buildings C9 P Dwelling: Multi-family P9 P P P P House museum in landmark site P P P P P Office and/or Reception center in a landmark site P P P P Reception center P P P P 338 339 LEGISLATIVE 16 340 SECTION 22. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That the 341 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based 342 Districts of Section 21A.33.870 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 343 Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended to add an additional note 344 “9”, which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 345 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 346 347 SECTION 23. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.170. That Section 348 21A.36.170 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Reuse of Church and School 349 Buildings) is hereby repealed in its entirety as follows: 350 21A.36.170: RESERVEDUSE OF CHURCH AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS: 351 A. Change Of Use: In the PL, PL-2, I, UI or any residential district, a change of use of 352 any church or school to a use that is allowed as a permitted use or conditional use in the zoning 353 district may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this 354 title. 355 B. Temporary Use Of Closed Schools And Churches; Authorized As Conditional Use: The 356 temporary use of closed schools and churches may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to 357 the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this title, in the zoning districts indicated in the land use 358 tables of this title, provided that: 359 1. Use: The temporary use is for office space or educational purposes for public or private 360 charities. 361 2. Application: The application for a temporary use of a closed school or church shall 362 include, in addition to the application submission requirements of chapter 21A.54 of this title, the 363 following information: 364 a. Building Plans: As part of the application, the applicant shall provide a site plan drawn 365 to scale showing existing structures, auxiliary buildings, existing 366 parking and landscaping, and any proposed changes to the site. In converting the existing facility 367 to the proposed conditional use, no major exterior or interior alterations of the building shall be 368 made which render the building incompatible with a return to its use as a school or church; and 369 b. Use Plan: A proposed use plan including: LEGISLATIVE 17 370 (1) Hours and days of operation, 371 (2) Evidence of noise, odor or vibration emissions, 372 (3) Evidence of the number of classes, including hours taught, days taught, and the 373 expected class size, 374 (4) Average number of clients per day and the frequency of turnover of the clients, and 375 (5) Number of employees, staff or volunteers, both total and expected to be on the 376 premises at any given time. 377 3. Prohibition: No provision of this section shall be construed to allow any use in a 378 closed school or church for retail, residential or industrial purposes, or any use involving any 379 type of correctional or institutional facility. 380 4. Ownership: The School Board or church shall remain the owner of the property during 381 the period of time for which the conditional use is granted and any change of ownership away 382 from the School Board or church shall immediately cause the conditional use to terminate. 383 5. Automatic Termination Of Use: If the School Board or church group determines that no 384 future public or religious use will be made of the building as a public school or church, the 385 conditional use as granted under this section shall immediately cease and the property shall 386 thereafter be used only for uses permitted in the zoning district. 387 6. Temporary Use: The conditional use provided by this section shall be temporary only. 388 The time of such use shall be subject to the decision of the Planning Commission based on its 389 consideration of the criteria specified in subsection B7 of this section. The Planning Commission 390 may authorize the conditional use for a period not to exceed five (5) years, which may be 391 renewed for additional periods not in excess of five (5) years. 392 7. Termination For Excess Use: If the Planning Commission determines that the conditional 393 use is being used substantially in excess of the plan for use submitted pursuant to subsection B2b 394 of this section, the Planning Commission may, after an informal hearing, revoke the conditional 395 use if it determines that the excess use is having a negative impact on the neighborhood. 396 397 SECTION 24. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.1 That Subsection 398 21A.44.060.A.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 399 Parking Location and Design: Generally: Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building 400 Served), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 401 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required 402 to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this 403 ordinance shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the building or use served, LEGISLATIVE 18 404 unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, "Off-Site Parking 405 Permitted", or 21A.55.020, “Planned Developments – Authority”. 406 407 SECTION 25. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.020. That 408 Section 21A.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Applicability) shall 409 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 410 411 21A.52.020 APPLICABILITY: 412 A. This chapter applies as indicated within each subsection. 413 B. The planned development process in Chapter 21A.55 is not required as indicated within 414 this chapter. 415 C. The administrative planned development process in Chapter 21A.55, and the 416 administrative design review process in Chapter 21A.59 may be applicable as indicated 417 within this chapter. 418 419 SECTION 26. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.030. That 420 Section 21A.52.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Relationship to Base 421 Zoning District and Overlay Zoning Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as 422 follows: 423 424 21A.52.030: RELATIONSHIP TO BASE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OVERLAY 425 ZONING DISTRICTS: 426 Unless otherwise indicated in this chapter, all base zoning district or overlay zoning district 427 standards and requirements take precedence except as indicated in this section. 428 429 SECTION 27. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.040. That 430 Section 21A.52.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Approval Process) 431 shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 432 433 21A.52.040: APPROVAL PROCESS: LEGISLATIVE 19 434 Unless specifically exempted or modified by this chapter, all requirements of this title shall 435 apply. 436 A. Zoning Incentives: Applicants using the zoning incentives in this chapter shall submit a 437 zoning incentives application and provide the following information: 438 1. The applicant's name, address, telephone number and interest in the property to which 439 the incentives shall apply; 440 2. The owner's name, address and telephone number, if different than the applicant, and 441 the owner's signed consent to the filing of the application; 442 3. The street address, tax parcel number and legal description of the subject property; 443 4. The zoning classification, zoning district boundaries and present use of the subject 444 property; 445 5. The location of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, accessory and 446 principal, showing the number of stories and height, dwelling type, if applicable, 447 major elevations and the total square footage of the floor area by proposed use and 448 any additional information required for site plan review set forth in Chapter 21A.58; 449 6. The total number of dwelling units in the project, the number of affordable units, the 450 number of bedrooms in the affordable units, the location of the affordable units, and 451 level of affordability; and 452 7. Any additional information required by Chapter 21A.59 design review or 21A.55 453 planned development, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this 454 chapter, as applicable; and 455 8. Any additional information the zoning administrator deems necessary to demonstrate 456 compliance with this chapter. 457 B. Preliminary approval shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications 458 for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, 459 a building permit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no permits shall be issued until final 460 approval is obtained pursuant to this Chapter. Preliminary approval shall be valid for a 461 period of one year unless complete building plans have been submitted to the Division of 462 Building Services. 463 C. Administrative design review and administrative planned development, where applicable, 464 shall be exempt from the application fees and noticing fees otherwise required pursuant 465 to Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55. 466 D. Following the approval of any administrative design review or planned development 467 application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the 468 approved design review application unless a modification is approved subject to the 469 process outlined in Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55, as applicable. 470 E. Final approval shall occur following the recording of the restrictive covenant. 471 F. Preliminary and final approvals shall be administrative approvals by the planning director 472 or the planning director's designee. 473 474 SECTION 28. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.A. That 475 Subsection 21A.52.050.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable 476 Housing Incentives: Purpose) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 20 477 478 21A.52.050 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES: 479 A. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section chapter are intended to encourage the 480 development of affordable housing. The provisions within this section are intended to 481 facilitate the construction of affordable housing by allowing more inclusive development 482 than would otherwise be permitted in the base zoning districts. Housing constructed using 483 the incentives is intended to be compatible in form with the neighborhood and provide for 484 safe and comfortable places to live and play. 485 486 SECTION 29. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3. 487 That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: 488 Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 489 490 3. Incentives in the CB Community Business, CC Corridor Commercial, CG General 491 Commercial, and I Institutional Zoning Districts: 492 a. The following housing types: row houses, sideways row houses, and cottage 493 developments are authorized provided the affordability requirements in 494 subsection b. are complied with;. 495 b. The minimum open space requirements in the I Institutional zoning district do 496 not apply. 497 c. To be eligible for the incentives listed in this subsection 3a., a development shall 498 meet the affordability requirements for Type C in Table 21A.52.050.G. 499 500 SECTION 30. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.52. That Chapter 501 21A.52 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended 502 to add a new Section 21A.52.060, with no other revisions to the chapter, to read as follows: 503 21A.52.060: BUILDING PRESERVATION INCENTIVES: 504 The provisions in this section provide optional incentives to development projects that include 505 the preservation of an existing building. The incentives located in Subsection 21A.52.060.A may 506 be combined with the incentives outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 507 A. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings: 508 509 1. Purpose: To allow additional land uses in buildings that generally contribute to the 510 character of the city so they can be redeveloped for economically viable uses. These LEGISLATIVE 21 511 buildings may be underutilized or have outlived their original use due to economic 512 conditions, size of the building, a substantial degree of deterioration of the property, 513 or other factors. Eligible buildings may hold historical or cultural significance or 514 contribute to the existing neighborhood fabric through their architectural features, 515 size, or previous use. 516 517 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to adaptive reuse of a building 518 that meets the eligibility standards in 21A.52.060.A.3. 519 520 3. Eligibility Standards: 521 a. The following buildings are eligible for the incentives in this subsection: 522 (1) Landmark Sites; 523 (2) Buildings individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places; 524 (3) Buildings designed and formerly used for schools, hospitals, places of 525 worship, or other similar institutional uses; and 526 (4) Buildings that the planning director has deemed significant based on the 527 structure’s association with events that have contributed to broad patterns of 528 history, association with lives of persons important in the city’s past, or 529 displays distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of 530 construction. 531 b. Exterior features that are important in defining the overall character of the 532 building shall be retained. 533 c. Exterior alterations to the eligible building shall meet the standards in 534 21A.34.020.G. 535 d. The proposed use is conducive to the preservation of the building. 536 e. A change of use to a residential use is not permitted in the OS (Open Space) 537 zoning district. 538 f.If the eligible building is located in a residential zoning district, and the existing 539 use is residential, a change of use to nonresidential is not permitted. 540 g. Properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay must obtain a Certificate 541 of Appropriateness in accordance with 21A.34.020. 542 4. Incentives: 543 a. Additional Uses: Unless prohibited by Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.a(1), any use 544 may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use in zoning districts where 545 Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings is listed in the land use 546 tables in Chapter 21A.33, subject to the provisions in this subsection and any 547 specific provisions applicable to the use in this title. Any conditional use shall be 548 reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards outlined in Chapter 21A.54. 549 (1) Prohibited Uses: A change of use to one of the following uses is prohibited: 550 Ambulance services (indoor and outdoor), amusement park, auditorium, bio- 551 medical facility, bus line station/terminal, bus line yard and repair facility, car 552 wash, check cashing/payday loan business, community correctional facility 553 (large and small), contractor’s yard/office, drive-through facility associated 554 with any use, equipment rental (indoor and outdoor), gas station, heliport, 555 hotel/motel, impound lot, intermodal transit passenger hub, jail, large wind 556 energy system, laundry and dry cleaning establishments, limousine service LEGISLATIVE 22 557 (large and small), heavy manufacturing, pet cemetery, recycling collection 558 station, sexually oriented business, sign painting/fabrication, storage 559 (outdoor), public storage (outdoor), wireless telecommunications facility, 560 homeless resource centers, and any other uses that are only allowed in the 561 manufacturing districts. 562 b. Parking and Loading: The following are the minimum off-street parking and 563 loading requirements for the eligible building. These minimums may be further 564 reduced with the alternatives to minimum parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 565 (1) Multi-Family: 0.5 off-street parking space per dwelling unit is required; 566 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 567 for the proposed use listed in the general context of the required off-street 568 parking table in 21A.44 may be reduced by 40%; 569 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 570 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 571 no additional parking shall be required; 572 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 573 c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements 574 of the zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In 575 the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 576 apply. 577 578 5. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 579 21A.52.060.A shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 580 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 581 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 582 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 583 with the land for the duration of the adaptive reuse and shall provide for the 584 following, without limitation: 585 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 586 conditions thereof; 587 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 588 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 589 important to the character of the building shall be preserved for the duration of the 590 adaptive reuse or if subject to 21A.34.020, indefinitely unless otherwise permitted 591 by the terms of a certificate of appropriateness; 592 c. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the potential 593 enforcement actions for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 594 595 6. Modifications to Approved Adaptive Reuse: Any modification to the use approved 596 under these incentives requires a new zoning incentives application. Any new 597 adaptive reuse shall also require a new zoning incentives application unless the new 598 use is permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the zoning district. 599 600 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection A, or the restrictive covenant on the 601 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.A.5, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 602 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for LEGISLATIVE 23 603 violations as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 604 21A.52.060.A.5, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 605 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 606 607 B. Preservation of a Principal Building: 608 609 1. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section are intended to encourage the 610 preservation of buildings, supporting city goals related to sustainability, 611 neighborhoods, economy, and housing. The provisions are designed to support 612 developments that include preserving an eligible building by allowing flexibility with 613 certain zoning regulations while still maintaining the unique urban fabric and 614 character of neighborhoods. 615 616 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to projects in all zoning districts 617 that preserve an existing principal building that meets the eligibility standards in 618 21A.52.060.B.3. These incentives may be applied to existing principal buildings and 619 new construction within the same development area. For the purposes of this 620 subsection, the development area may include multiple abutting lots or parcels. 621 622 3. Eligibility Standards: 623 a. Building Age: The existing building to be preserved was built prior to 1976. 624 b. Minimum Footprint of Eligible Building: The footprint of the eligible building to 625 be preserved covers a minimum of 25% of the development area. A lower 626 percentage may be considered by the planning director if the building has frontage 627 on a public street, contains a publicly accessible use such as retail, restaurant, or 628 entertainment, or would be highly visible from public spaces within the interior of 629 the site. 630 c. Retention of All Existing Principal Structures: In the FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R - 631 1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000, R-2, SR-1, SR-1A, SR-3, and all RMF zoning 632 districts, all existing principal structures included in the overall development area 633 shall be retained. 634 d. Modifications to Existing Building: A maximum of 25% of each street facing 635 building wall may be removed to accommodate modifications or additions. No 636 more than 50% of the building’s exterior walls may be removed. Portions of a 637 building wall with character defining architectural features shall not be removed. 638 e. Retention of Existing Active Commercial Uses: Eligible buildings with existing 639 active commercial uses with ground level street frontage are subject to the 640 following requirements. For the purpose of this subsection, active commercial 641 uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent 642 to a building and encourage pedestrian activity and walk-in traffic. Active uses 643 may include retail goods/service establishments, restaurants, bars, art and craft 644 studios, or other uses determined to be substantially similar in terms of activation 645 by the planning director. 646 (1) A minimum of 50% of the length shall be retained along the street frontage in 647 the existing building or be included as part of the new development. If 648 included in the new development, the active commercial use shall have the LEGISLATIVE 24 649 primary entrance on the street frontage with direct public access from the 650 street frontage. 651 (2) The existing depth of the active commercial use shall be maintained or a 652 minimum depth of 25 feet, whichever is less. 653 (3) These requirements do not apply to nonconforming active commercial uses 654 with ground level street frontage. 655 656 4. Incentives: 657 a. Planned Development Waived: A planned development is not required for the 658 following: 659 (1) More Than One Principal Building Per Lot: More than one principal building 660 per lot is allowed without having frontage along a public street. 661 (2) Lots without Frontage on a Public Street: Lots do not require frontage on a 662 public street if necessary cross access easements are provided. 663 b. Administrative Planned Development: The following are authorized through an 664 administrative planned development pursuant to the procedures and standards in 665 Chapter 21A.55. The minimum planned development size required by 666 21A.55.060 does not apply: 667 (1) Modification to the minimum yard requirements. 668 (2) Modification to the open space and landscaping requirements when the 669 modification specifically relates to preserving the existing building(s). 670 (3) Modifications to the provisions for awnings and canopies, balconies, patios, 671 and porches in Table 21A.36.020.B, Obstructions in Required Yards. 672 (4) Modifications to the parking location and setback requirements in Table 673 21A.44.060.A. 674 (5) Parking within the boundary of a planned development area but located on a 675 different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is allowed and is 676 not considered off-site parking. The parking must only serve the uses within 677 the planned development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions 678 of this title. 679 c.Minimum Lot Area, Width & Coverage: 680 (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 681 width tables of the zoning district does not apply. 682 (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 683 width tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning 684 districts: FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. 685 (3) RMF-30 zoning district: The minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 686 apply. 687 (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the 688 individual lot or parcel within the development area. 689 d.Height: Additional building height is authorized in zoning districts as indicated in 690 the following sections through administrative design review. The maximum 691 height per story of the additional building height incentive shall not exceed 12 692 feet. Administrative design review shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures 693 and standards in Chapter 21A.59. The additional height authorized by this LEGISLATIVE 25 694 subsection shall not be combined with the additional height authorized by 695 Subsection 21A.52.050, Affordable Housing Incentives. 696 697 (1) Residential districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive RMU-35 45’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RMU-45 55’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RMU 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RO 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 698 699 (2) Commercial Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive CB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CN May build one additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CC 45’ CG 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building for properties in the boundary described in 21A.26.070.G. CSHBD1 105’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CSHBD2 60’ and 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Transition 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Core 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 700 LEGISLATIVE 26 701 (3) Form-based districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 90’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-MU11 125’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN2 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SC 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SE 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN1 3 stories and 30’ in height. 702 703 (4) Downtown districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive D-2 120’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. D-3 180’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 704 705 (5) Other districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive GMU 180’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. MU 60’ provided that the additional height is for residential uses only. I Building heights in excess of 35' but not more than 75' provided, that for each foot of height over 35', each required yard shall be increased 1'. UI Building heights in excess of 75' but not more 120' provided that the additional height is supported by the master plan and compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. OS – Lots greater than 4 acres Building heights in excess of 45’ up to 60’ provided that for each foot of height over 45’, each required yard and landscaped yard shall be increased by 1’. 706 LEGISLATIVE 27 707 708 e. Administrative design review is permitted for the following: 709 (1) Buildings in the CSHBD1 or CSHBD2 zoning district that exceed 20,000 710 square feet in size. 711 (2) Buildings in the CB zoning district that exceed 7,500 gross square feet of floor 712 area for a first-floor footprint or in excess of 15,000 gross square feet floor 713 area. 714 f. Parking: The following are the minimum off-street parking requirements unless a 715 lesser requirement is listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44. 716 These minimums may be further reduced with the alternatives to minimum 717 parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 718 (1) Residential: 0.5 space per dwelling unit for multi-family; 1 space per dwelling 719 unit for all other residential uses. 720 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 721 for the proposed use listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44 722 may be reduced by 40%. 723 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 724 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 725 no additional parking shall be required. 726 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 727 728 g. Minimum Required Yards: The minimum required yards may apply to the 729 perimeter of the development area and not to the individual lot or parcel within 730 the development area. 731 732 5. Design Standards for New Construction: Unless a stricter design standard related to 733 each of the following is included in the base zone or Chapter 21A.37, the following 734 design standards are required for all zones except single and two-family zoning 735 districts: 736 a. Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, 50% of any street facing 737 facade shall be clad in durable materials. Durable materials include stone, brick, 738 masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that 739 includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, 740 weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials 741 may be used for the remainder of the facade facing the street. Other materials 742 proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of 743 the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is 744 appropriate for the proposed location on the building. 745 b. Ground Floor Glass: The surface area of the ground floor of a street facing façade 746 shall contain a minimum percentage of glass as indicated below, calculated 747 between 3 feet and 8 feet above grade. All ground floor glass shall allow 748 unhampered and unobstructed visibility into the building for a depth of at least 5 749 feet, excluding any glass etching and window signs when installed and permitted 750 in accordance with Chapter 21A.46, "Signs", of this title. 751 (1) Nonresidential Uses: 50% ground floor glass 752 (2) Residential Uses: If the ground level of the building is occupied by residential 753 uses that face the street, the minimum glass requirement is 20%. LEGISLATIVE 28 754 c. Upper Floor Glass: The surface area of the façade of each street facing floor 755 above the ground floor must contain a minimum of 20% glass. 756 d. Maximum Length of a Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall 757 uninterrupted by windows or doors at the ground floor level along any street 758 facing façade is 15 feet. Emergency exit doors and doors to access structured 759 parking or utility equipment shall not count as an interruption. 760 e. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: 761 (1) The maximum length of each street facing building facade shall not exceed 762 100 feet in the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 districts. 763 (2) The maximum length of each street facing building façade shall not 764 exceed 175 feet in all other zoning districts. 765 f.Building Entrances: A building entrance that provides direct access to the use 766 with a walkway connected to the public sidewalk is required for each ground floor 767 street facing façade as follows: 768 (1) Single Family Attached: All units abutting a street shall have the primary 769 entrance on the street. 770 (2) Multi-family: At least one building entrance is required for each street facing 771 façade. Additional building entrances shall be required every 75 feet. 772 (3) Unless the base zone of the property has specific entry feature requirements, 773 all required residential building entries shall have an unenclosed entry porch, 774 portico, awning or canopy, or emphasized doorway entry feature as described 775 in 21A.37.050.P. The entry feature may encroach in the front yard setback, 776 but the encroachment shall not be closer than 5 feet from the front property 777 line. 778 (4) Nonresidential Uses: At least one building entrance is required for each street 779 facing façade. Additional building entrances shall be required every 40 feet. 780 g. Garage Doors Facing Street: Garage doors are prohibited on the façade of the 781 building that is parallel to, or located along, a public street. 782 h. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment shall be screened 783 from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of 784 siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural 785 design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location 786 restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020B, “Obstructions In 787 Required Yards”. 788 789 6. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 790 21A.52.060.B shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 791 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 792 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 793 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 794 with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: 795 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 796 conditions thereof; 797 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 798 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 799 important to the character of the building shall be preserved during the term; 800 c. Projects that apply the incentives to new buildings on the development site shall 801 guarantee retention of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives for a LEGISLATIVE 29 802 minimum term of 30 years or, if the eligible building is subject to 21A.34.020, 803 indefinitely unless otherwise permitted by the terms of a certificate of 804 appropriateness after such 30 year period; 805 d. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the city’s potential 806 remedies for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 807 808 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection B, or the restrictive covenant on the 809 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.B.6, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 810 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for violations 811 as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 812 21A.52.060.B.6, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 813 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.B. Financial remedies for a 814 violation of the covenant may include liquidated damages representing a reasonable 815 estimate of the value of the incentives, plus other associated damages valued up to 816 20% of the tax assessed value of the preserved building over the three preceding 817 years. 818 819 820 SECTION 31. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.020. That 821 Section 21A.55.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Authority) shall 822 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 823 824 21A.55.020: AUTHORITY: 825 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with 826 modifications, deny, or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific 827 zoning standards outlined in 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying 828 provisions in 21A.52.060.B in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in 829 this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 830 located. 831 832 B. Planning Commission Review: The Pplanning Ccommission may approve planned 833 developments for uses listed in the tables of permitted and conditional uses for each 834 category of zoning district or districts. The approval shall be in accordance with the 835 standards and procedures set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the 836 district in which the property is located. 837 In approving a planned development, the Pplanning Ccommission may change, alter, 838 modify or waive the following provisions of this title: 839 1A. Zoning Aand Subdivision Regulations: Any provisions of this title or of the Ccity's 840 subdivision regulations as they apply to the proposed planned development except 841 that the Pplanning Ccommission cannot approve a use that is not allowed in the 842 zoning district in which the planned development is located, with the exception of 843 off-site parking as further described in this section. LEGISLATIVE 30 844 2B. Off-Site Parking: Off-site pParking within the boundary of a planned development 845 area, but located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is 846 in zoning districts where off-site parking is not an allowed and not considered off- 847 site parking use. The parking must only serve the uses be located within the planned 848 development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions of this title. 849 3C.Building Height: Up to five feet (5') of additional building height, except in the FR, 850 R-1, SR, or R-2 Zzoning Ddistricts where additional building height cannot be 851 approved through the planned development process. 852 4D.Density: Residential planned developments shall not exceed the density limitation 853 of the zoning district where the planned development is proposed except as allowed 854 below. The calculation of planned development density may include open space that 855 is provided as an amenity to the planned development. Public streets located within 856 or adjacent to a planned development shall not be included in the planned 857 development area for the purpose of calculating density. 858 a1. In the RMF Zzoning Ddistricts and on lots 0.20 acres or more in size, 859 developments that change a nonconforming commercial use to a residential use 860 that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density limitations of 861 the zoning district when approved as a planned development. 862 863 SECTION 32. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.030. That 864 Section 21A.55.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Planning 865 Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 866 867 21A.55.030: PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 868 869 A. No Presumption Oof Approval: A request for a planned development does not constitute 870 an assurance or presumption that such planned development will be approved. Rather, 871 each proposed planned development shall be evaluated on an individual basis, in relation 872 to its compliance with the standards and factors set forth in this chapter and with the 873 standards for the zoning district in which it is located, in order to determine whether the 874 planned development is appropriate at a particular location. 875 876 B. Approval: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 877 planned developments, may approve a planned development as proposed or may impose 878 conditions necessary or appropriate for the planned development to comply with the 879 standards and factors set forth in this chapter. 880 881 C. Denial: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 882 planned developments, may deny an application for a planned development if it finds that 883 the proposal does not meet the intent of the base zoning district, does not meet the LEGISLATIVE 31 884 purpose of this chapter, or is not consistent with the standards and factors as set forth in 885 this chapter. 886 887 888 SECTION 33. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.040. That 889 Section 21A.55.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Procedures) 890 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 891 892 21A.55.040: PROCEDURES: 893 894 A. Application: An application for a planned development shall be made on an application 895 form prepared by the zoning administrator and accompanied by applicable fees as noted 896 in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible 897 for payment of all mailing fees established for required public noticing. The applicant 898 must file an application for planned development approval with the Planning Director. A 899 complete application shall contain at least the following information submitted by the 900 applicant, unless certain information is determined by the zoning administrator Planning 901 Director to be inapplicable or unnecessary to appropriately evaluate the application. The 902 application submittal shall include one paper copy and one digital copy: 903 904 1. A complete description of the proposed planned development including the zoning 905 regulations being modified in the planned development and the planning objectives 906 being met; 907 2. When the proposed planned development includes provisions for common open space 908 or recreational facilities, a statement describing the provision to be made for the care 909 and maintenance of such open space or recreational facilities; 910 3. A written statement with supporting graphics showing how the proposed planned 911 development is compatible with other property in the neighborhood; 912 4. Plans, as required pursuant to sSection 21A.58.060 of this title, with the exception of 913 the number of copies required; 914 5. Architectural graphics including floor plans, elevations, profiles and cross sections; 915 6. A preliminary subdivision plat, if required; 916 7. Traffic impact analysis, where required by the City Transportation Division; and 917 8. Other information or documentation the zoning administratorPlanning Director may 918 deem necessary for proper review and analysis of a particular application. 919 920 B. Determination Oof Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a planned 921 development, the zoning administratorPlanning Director shall make a determination of 922 completeness of the application pursuant to sSection 21A.10.010 of this title. 923 924 C. Public Notification and Engagement: 925 LEGISLATIVE 32 926 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an 927 application that qualifies for administrative review, the planning director shall 928 provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10.020.B. 929 930 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: 931 a. Applications subject to planning commission review are subject to the notification 932 requirements of Chapter 2.60. 933 b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements 934 found in Chapter 21A.10. 935 936 Staff Report: Upon completing a site plan review and receiving recommendations from 937 applicable City department(s)/division(s), a staff report evaluating the planned development 938 application shall be prepared by the Planning Division and forwarded to the applicant and the 939 Planning Commission. 940 941 D. Public Hearing: The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review the 942 planned development application in accordance with the standards and procedures set 943 forth in chapter 21A.10 of this title. 944 945 E. Planning Commission Action: Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission 946 shall decide, on the basis of the standards contained in section 21A.55.050 of this chapter 947 whether to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the application. 948 949 F. Notification Of Decision: The Planning Director shall notify the applicant of the decision 950 of the Planning Commission in writing, accompanied by one copy of the submitted plans 951 marked to show such decision and a copy of the motion approving, approving with 952 modifications, or denying the development plan application. 953 954 955 SECTION 34. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.050. That 956 Section 21A.55.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Standards for 957 Planned Developments) shall be, and hereby is amended, as to the preamble only with 958 Subsections A through G unchanged: 959 960 21A.55.050: STANDARDS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: 961 962 The Pplanning Ccommission, or the planning director in the case of an administrative planned 963 development, may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a planned development based upon 964 written findings of fact according to each of the following standards. It is the responsibility of the 965 applicant to provide written and graphic evidence demonstrating compliance with the following 966 standards: 967 LEGISLATIVE 33 968 969 SECTION 35. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.070. That 970 Section 21A.55.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Appeal of the 971 Planning Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 972 973 21A.55.070: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 974 Any person adversely affected by a final decision of the Pplanning Ccommission or planning 975 director in the case of administrative planned developments, on an application for a planned 976 development may appeal to the Aappeals Hhearing Oofficer in accordance with the provisions 977 of cChapter 21A.16 of this title. The filing of the appeal shall not stay the pending the outcome 978 of the appeal, except as provided for under sSection 21A.16.030F of this title. 979 980 SECTION 36. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.080. That 981 Section 21A.55.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Time Limit on 982 Approved Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 983 984 21A.55.080: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 985 No planned development approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless a 986 building permit has been issued or complete building plans have been submitted to the Division 987 of Building Services and Licensing. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case 988 of an administrative planned development, may grant an extension of a planned development for 989 up to one additional year when the applicant is able to demonstrate no change in circumstance 990 that would result in an unmitigated impact. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the 991 expiration of the planned development approval. 992 993 SECTION 37. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.090. That 994 Section 21A.55.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Effect of 995 Approval of Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 996 997 21A.55.090: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: LEGISLATIVE 34 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 The approval of a proposed planned development by the Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall not authorize the establishment or extension of any use nor the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of any building or structure, but shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications for any permits or approvals that may be required by the regulations of the Ccity, including, but not limited to, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy and subdivision approval. SECTION 38. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.100. That 1007 Section 21A.55.100 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Modifications 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 to Development Plan) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.100: MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Following planned development approval, the development plan approved by the Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall constitute the site design in relation to building placement and design, landscaping, mobility and circulation elements, and any elements that were approved as zoning modifications through the planned development process. Modifications to the development plan may be allowed pursuant to this section. A. New Application Required Ffor Modifications Aand Amendments: No substantial Mmodifications or amendments shall be made in the construction, development or use without a new application under subject to the provisions of this section.title. Minor modifications or amendments may be made subject to written approval of the Planning Director and the date for completion may be extended by the Planning Commission upon recommendation of the Planning Director. B. Minor Modifications: The Pplanning Ddirector may authorize minor modifications to the approved development plan pursuant to the provisions for modifications to an approved site plan as set forth in chapter 21A.58 of this title when such modifications appear necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations necessary to comply with an adopted building, fire, or engineering code or standard or when the modification complies with the applicable standards in the underlying zoning district or overlay district. Such minor modifications shall be limited to the following elements: 1. Adjusting the distance as shown on the approved development plan between any one structure or group of structures, and any other structure or group of structures, or any vehicular circulation element or any boundary of the site; 2. Adjusting the location of any open space; LEGISLATIVE 35 1034 3. Adjusting any final grade; 1035 4. Altering the types of landscaping elements and their arrangement within the 1036 required landscaping buffer area; 1037 5. Signs; 1038 6. Relocation or construction of accessory structures that comply with the provisions 1039 of 21A.40 and any applicable accessory structure regulations; or 1040 7. Additions which comply with the lot and bulk requirements of the underlying 1041 zone. 1042 Such minor modifications shall be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title and 1043 the development plan as approved pursuant to this chapter and shall be the minimum 1044 necessary to overcome the particular difficulty comply with the standards of the 1045 underlying zoning district or the applicable building, fire, or engineering code or standard 1046 and shall not be approved if such modifications would result in a violation of any 1047 standard or requirement of this title. A minor modification shall not be approved if the 1048 modification reduces a required building setback, authorizes an increase in lot coverage, 1049 or increases building height. 1050 C. Major Modifications: Any modifications to the approved development plan not 1051 authorized by sSubsection B of this section shall be considered to be a major 1052 modification. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an 1053 administrative planned development, shall give notice to all property owners consistent 1054 with notification requirements located in chapter 21A.10 of this title. The Pplanning 1055 Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, 1056 may approve an application for a major modification to the approved development plan, 1057 not requiring a modification of written conditions of approval or recorded easements, 1058 upon finding that any changes in the plan as approved will be in substantial conformity 1059 with the approved development plan. If the commission or planning director in the case 1060 of an administrative planned development, determines that a major modification is not in 1061 substantial conformity with the approved development plan, then the commission or 1062 planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall review the 1063 request in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. 1064 D. Other Modifications: Any modification to the planned development that complies with 1065 the standards of the underlying zoning district or overlay zoning district is allowed 1066 provided the modification does not violate a condition of approval or other requirement 1067 placed on the planned development as part of the approval of the application and required 1068 permits and approvals are obtained. 1069 LEGISLATIVE 36 1070 SECTION 39. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.59.020.A. That 1071 Subsection 21A.59.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Review: Authority: 1072 Administrative Review) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1073 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, 1074 deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when 1075 proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing 1076 structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, 1077 Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized in the specific zoning district 1078 elsewhere in this title. 1079 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director 1080 finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, 1081 the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, 1082 the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other 1083 buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, 1084 and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives 1085 (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 1086 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions 1087 or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is 1088 necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of 1089 the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with 1090 the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face 1091 on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review 1092 objectives. 1093 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does 1094 not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the 1095 applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no 1096 modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the 1097 design comply. 1098 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning 1099 commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than 1100 allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification 1101 can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the 1102 request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided 1103 in this section. 1104 LEGISLATIVE 37 1105 SECTION 40. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That 1106 Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall 1107 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1108 a. Amending the definition of “ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A LANDMARK 1109 BUILDING.” That the definition shall be amended to read as follows: 1110 ADAPTIVE REUSE FOR ADDITTIONAL USES IN ELIGIBLE OF A LANDMARK 1111 BUILDINGS: The process of reusing a building for a purpose other than which it was built or 1112 designed for landmark buildings original use is no longer feasible. Other land uses, in addition to 1113 those specifically listed in the land use tables, may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use 1114 subject to the provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 1115 1116 b. Amending the definition of “PARKING, OFF SITE.” That the definition of 1117 “PARKING, OFF SITE” shall be amended to read as follows: 1118 PARKING, OFF SITE: An off-street parking area intended to serve one or more uses and that is 1119 located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve. Parking approved within 1120 the boundary of a planned development that only serves uses within the planned development 1121 area is not considered off-site parking. 1122 c. Repealing the definition “HOUSE MUSEUM IN A LANDMARK SITE” as 1123 follows: 1124 HOUSE MUSEUM IN LANDMARK SITE: A dwelling unit which is converted from its original 1125 principal use as a dwelling unit to a staffed institution dedicated to educational, aesthetic or 1126 historic purposes. Such museum should include a staff who commands an appropriate body of 1127 special knowledge necessary to convey the historical, aesthetic or architectural attributes of the 1128 building and its collections to the general public. Such staff should also have the ability to reach 1129 museological decisions consonant with the experience of his or her peers and have access to and 1130 acquaintance with the literature of the field. Such museum should maintain either regular hours 1131 or be available for appointed visits such that access is reasonably convenient to the public. 1132 1133 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 1134 first publication. LEGISLATIVE 38 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 2024. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , CHAIRPERSON 1140 1141 1142 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Adaptive Reuse Preservation Incentives_Opt2(legislative)v1 2.ORDINANCE (VERSION 1) LEGISLATIVE 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings) 6 7 An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City 8 Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings pursuant to 9 Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155. 10 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning 11 Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin 12 Mendenhall to amend the zoning code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and 13 preservation of buildings (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155); and 14 WHEREAS, at its February 28, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 15 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.015.A. That 21 Subsection 21A.10.015.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 22 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Engagement: Land Use Projects Subject to 23 Public Engagement) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 24 A. Land Use Projects Subject to Public Engagement: The following are considered land use 25 projects for purposes of this chapter and are subject to the public engagement process and 26 requirements herein: 27 28 1. Request for an alley/street closure or vacation; 29 2. Amendments to Title 21A; 30 3. Conditional use applications; LEGISLATIVE 2 31 4. Design review applications, that are subject to review by the planning commission as 32 provided in Chapter 21A.59; 33 5. Applications to demolish one or more landmark sites or contributing structures 34 located within a local historic district; 35 6. Master plans, including amendments, to be adopted by the city council; 36 7. Requests for certificates of appropriateness required for new construction of principal 37 structures, except for single family and two family dwellings; 38 8. Planned development applications that are subject to review by the planning 39 commission as provided in Chapter 21A.55; and 40 9. Zoning map amendments. 41 42 43 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.020.B. That 44 Subsection 21A.10.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 45 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Hearing Notice Requirements: Special 46 Noticing Requirements for Certain Administrative Approvals) shall be, and hereby is amended to 47 read as follows: 48 B. Special Noticing Requirements for Administrative Approvals: 49 50 1. Notice of Application for Design Review and Planned Development: 51 52 a. Notification: At least twelve (12) days before a land use decision is made for an 53 administrative design review application as authorized in Chapter 21A.59 of this 54 title, or an administrative planned development as authorized by Chapter 21A.55 55 of this title, the planning director shall provide written notice to the following: 56 (1) All owners and identifiable tenants of the subject property, land abutting the 57 subject property, and land located directly across the street from the subject 58 property. In identifying the owners and tenants of the land the city shall use 59 the Salt Lake City geographic information system records. 60 (2) Recognized community organization(s) in which the subject property is 61 located. 62 63 b. Contents of the Notice of Application: The notice shall generally describe the 64 subject matter of the application, where the public may review the application, the 65 expected date when the planning director will authorize a final land use decision, 66 and the procedures to appeal the land use decision. 67 68 c. End of Notification Period: If the planning director receives comments identifying 69 concerns related to the design review application not complying with the 70 requirements of Chapter 21A.59, or the planned development not complying with LEGISLATIVE 3 71 the requirements of Chapter 21A.55, the planning director may refer the matter to 72 the planning commission for their review and decision on the application. 73 74 75 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.S. That 76 Subsection 21A.24.010.S of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 77 Provisions: Adaptive Reuse of a Landmark Building in Residential Districts) shall be, and hereby 78 is amended to read as follows: 79 80 S. Compliance with Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential zoning 81 districts shall comply with Section 9.28.040, “Noises Prohibited.”Adaptive Reuse Of A 82 Landmark Building In Residential Districts: 83 1. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the adaptive reuse of a landmark site in a residential 84 district is to preserve landmark sites as defined in subsection 21A.34.020B of this title. In some 85 instances these sites have outlived their original use due to economic conditions, size of the 86 building, and/or a substantial degree of deterioration of the historic property. Such sites, 87 however, still contribute to the welfare, property and education of the people of Salt Lake City 88 because of their historic, architectural or cultural significance. The Planning Commission shall 89 consider the allowance of a nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential district 90 according to the qualifying provisions outlined in subsection S2a of this section and pursuant 91 to chapter 21A.54 of this title, in order to ensure that the residential character of the surrounding 92 environment is preserved. 93 2. Conditional Use Required: Where authorized by this title as shown in 94 section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of 95 this title, landmark sites in any residential district may be used for certain nonresidential uses. 96 a. Qualifying Provisions: In order to qualify for conditional use review by the 97 Planning Commission under section 21A.54.080, "Standards For Conditional Uses", of 98 this title, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with the following: 99 (1) The building is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City 100 register of cultural resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the 101 City accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 102 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the designation 103 and conditional use applications together. 104 (2) The landmark building shall have a minimum of seven thousand (7,000) 105 square feet of floor area, excluding accessory buildings. 106 (3) The new use will require minimal change as these features are important 107 in defining the overall historic character of the building and environment. 108 (4) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site. LEGISLATIVE 4 109 (5) Significant archaeological resources affected by the project shall be 110 protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures 111 shall be undertaken. 112 (6) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. 113 (7) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of 114 craftsmanship that characterize the property shall be preserved. 115 (8) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 116 structure or site including mature landscaping. 117 (9) The change in use from residential to nonresidential is necessary due to 118 the excessive size of the landmark site for residential uses allowed in the residential 119 district, and/or demonstration that the building cannot reasonably be used for its 120 original intended use. 121 (10) The proposed use will not have a material net cumulative adverse 122 impact on the neighborhood or the City as a whole by considering the following: 123 (A) The spatial distribution of: 124 (i) Business licenses issued for properties located within three 125 hundred feet (300') of any property line and the block frontage on both sides 126 of the street between 100 series addresses; and 127 (ii) Previously approved conditional uses for nonresidential uses 128 in landmark sites within the same planning community, as shown on a map of 129 planning communities maintained by the Zoning Administrator. 130 (B) Impacts on neighboring properties including, but not limited to: 131 (i) Traffic; 132 (ii) Parking; 133 (iii) Signs; 134 (iv) Lighting; 135 (v) Removal of landscaping; and 136 (vi) For the purposes of evaluating subsections S2a(10)(B)(i) 137 through S2a(10)(B)(v) of this section, professionally prepared impact studies 138 shall not be required unless specifically requested by the Zoning 139 Administrator; 140 (vii) Noise, fumes or odors; 141 b. Credit For On Street Parking: Some or all of the off street parking spaces 142 required in section 21A.44.030 of this title may be met by the provision of on street 143 spaces. Such credit shall require the site plan review approval. Requests for on street 144 parking shall meet the following requirements: LEGISLATIVE 5 145 (1) All on street parking facilities shall be designed in conformance with the 146 standards established by the City Transportation Engineer; 147 (2) Prior to approving any requests for on street parking, the development 148 review team shall determine that the proposed on street parking will not materially 149 adversely impact traffic movements and related public street functions; and 150 (3) Credit for on street parking shall be limited to the number of spaces 151 provided along the street frontage adjacent to the use. 152 153 SECTION 4. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.W. That 154 Subsection 21A.24.010.W of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 155 Provisions: Compliance with Noise Regulations Required) shall be, and hereby is repealed in its 156 entirety as follows: 157 158 W. Compliance With Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential 159 zoning districts shall comply with section 9.28.040, "Noises Prohibited", of this Code. 160 161 SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.130.E.6. 162 That Subsection 21A.24.010.E.6 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RMF- 163 35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District: Minimum Yard Requirements: Existing 164 Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 165 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard 166 shall be no greater than the established setback line of the existing building unless the 167 proposed yard encroachment is to accommodate additional units. New principal 168 buildings must conform to current yard area requirements, unless the new principal 169 two-family dwelling or twin home has legal conforming status as outlined in 170 section 21A.38.070 of this title. 171 172 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.160.D. That 173 Subsection 21A.24.160.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RB 174 Residential/Business District: Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width) shall be, and hereby is LEGISLATIVE 6 175 amended only to eliminate the Land Use “A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail 176 or office uses” from the table in said subsection, with no other changes to the table: 177 178 179 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.180.I. That 180 Subsection 21A.24.180.I of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RO 181 Residential/Office District: Offices in Existing Buildings on Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand 182 Square Feet) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 183 I. Offices iIn Existing Buildings oOn Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand Square Feet: 184 Offices occupying existing buildings are permitted on a five thousand (5,000) square foot 185 minimum lot. Additions to existing buildings that are greater than fifty percent (50%) of 186 the existing building footprint or that exceed the height of the existing building shall be 187 subject to design review (chapter 21A.59 of this title) unless the existing building is using 188 the incentives in 21A.52.060. 189 190 SECTION 8. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.26.010.K. That 191 Subsection 21A.26.010.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Commercial Districts: General 192 Provisions: Bed and Breakfast Establishments and Reception Centers in Landmark Sites in the 193 CN Neighborhood Commercial and CB Community Business Districts) shall be, and hereby is 194 repealed in its entirety as follows: 195 196 K. Bed And Breakfast Establishments And Reception Centers In Landmark Sites In The CN 197 Neighborhood Commercial And CB Community Business Districts: 198 1. Conditional Use Required: Where not otherwise authorized by this title and after 199 conditional use approval by the Planning Commission pursuant to chapter 21A.54 of this Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail or office uses Included in principal use Included in principal use LEGISLATIVE 7 200 title, landmark sites in a CN or CB District may be used for a bed and breakfast 201 establishment or reception center subject to the following standards: 202 a. Standards: In addition to the standards for conditional uses, section 21A.54.080 of 203 this title, the Planning Commission shall find the following: 204 (1) The structure is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City Register of 205 Cultural Resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the City 206 accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 207 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the 208 designation and conditional use applications at the same time because of the risk 209 of probable demolition; 210 (2) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site; 211 (3) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood; and 212 (4) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 213 structure (if the structure is a residential structure), including mature landscaping. 214 b. Condition Of Approval: A preservation easement in favor of the City shall be placed 215 upon the landmark site. 216 217 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 218 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 219 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 220 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling, multi-family” and “Mixed use development” and to repeal 221 only the use category “Temporary use of closed schools and churches”, with no other changes to the 222 table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as follows: 8 223 Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 RB R-MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Adaptive reuse for additiona l uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P86 Dwelling , multi- family P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P P P P P P P P P Mixed use develop ment P1 P P P P Temporar y use of closed schools and churches C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 224 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 9 225 226 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That the 227 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 228 Districts of Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 229 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 230 notes “1”, “6”, “8” and “19” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as 231 follows: 232 1. Reserved. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 233 234 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 235 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the 236 building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review 237 unless the building qualifies for the incentives in 21A.52.060. 238 239 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSubsection 21A.52.060.A 21A.24.010S 240 of this title. 241 242 19. Reserved. Subject to section 21A.36.170 of this title. 243 244 245 246 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 247 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 248 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be amended only as to the use category “Bed and 249 breakfast” and to repeal only the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House 250 museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception centers in landmark sites”, with no other 251 changes to the table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as 252 follows: 253 254 255 Use Permitted and Conditional Uses by District LEGISLATIVE 10 CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P Bed and breakfast manor C3 C3 P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C 257 258 259 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 260 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial 261 Districts of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 262 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 263 note “3” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 264 3. Reserved. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City register of cultural 265 resources (see subsections 21A.26.010S and 21A.26.010K of this title). 266 267 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 268 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 269 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) is amended only to repeal the use categories 270 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception 271 centers in landmark sites”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area 272 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: LEGISLATIVE 11 273 Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Use Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 2 1A.24.010S of this title) P P P P P P P P Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010. S of this title) P P P P P P P P 274 275 276 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That Section 277 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 278 Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 279 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for 280 Manufacturing Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse M-1 M-2 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7 281 LEGISLATIVE 12 282 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That the 283 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing 284 Districts of Section 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 285 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as 286 to note “7” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 287 7. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 288 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent 289 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 290 review. 291 292 SECTION 16. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 293 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 294 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 295 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 296 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 298 299 SECTION 17. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 300 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 301 Districts of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 302 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 303 note “4” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 304 4. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 305 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent LEGISLATIVE 13 306 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 307 review (chapter 21A.59 of this title). 308 309 SECTION 18. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 310 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 311 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 312 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway 313 District, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Use G-MU Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P 314 315 SECTION 19. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 316 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 317 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be amended only for the use categories 318 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site” and “Dwelling: Multi-family”, in the Table of Permitted and 319 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 14 320 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG- 2 AG- 5 AG- 20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C2 C2 C2 C2 P2 P2 Dwelling: Multi- family P2 P2 P2 P P 321 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 15 322 323 SECTION 20. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That the 324 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose 325 Districts of Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 326 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only 327 as to note “2” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 328 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. When located 329 in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 330 331 SECTION 21. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That Section 332 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 333 Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 334 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling: Multi-family”, and “Reception center” and to repeal only the 335 use categories “House museum in a landmark”, and “Office and/or reception center in a landmark 336 site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts, with no other changes 337 to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible of a landmark buildings C9 P Dwelling: Multi-family P9 P P P P House museum in landmark site P P P P P Office and/or Reception center in a landmark site P P P P Reception center P P P P 338 339 LEGISLATIVE 16 340 SECTION 22. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That the 341 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based 342 Districts of Section 21A.33.870 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 343 Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended to add an additional note 344 “9”, which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 345 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 346 347 SECTION 23. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.170. That Section 348 21A.36.170 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Reuse of Church and School 349 Buildings) is hereby repealed in its entirety as follows: 350 21A.36.170: RESERVEDUSE OF CHURCH AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS: 351 A. Change Of Use: In the PL, PL-2, I, UI or any residential district, a change of use of 352 any church or school to a use that is allowed as a permitted use or conditional use in the zoning 353 district may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this 354 title. 355 B. Temporary Use Of Closed Schools And Churches; Authorized As Conditional Use: The 356 temporary use of closed schools and churches may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to 357 the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this title, in the zoning districts indicated in the land use 358 tables of this title, provided that: 359 1. Use: The temporary use is for office space or educational purposes for public or private 360 charities. 361 2. Application: The application for a temporary use of a closed school or church shall 362 include, in addition to the application submission requirements of chapter 21A.54 of this title, the 363 following information: 364 a. Building Plans: As part of the application, the applicant shall provide a site plan drawn 365 to scale showing existing structures, auxiliary buildings, existing 366 parking and landscaping, and any proposed changes to the site. In converting the existing facility 367 to the proposed conditional use, no major exterior or interior alterations of the building shall be 368 made which render the building incompatible with a return to its use as a school or church; and 369 b. Use Plan: A proposed use plan including: LEGISLATIVE 17 370 (1) Hours and days of operation, 371 (2) Evidence of noise, odor or vibration emissions, 372 (3) Evidence of the number of classes, including hours taught, days taught, and the 373 expected class size, 374 (4) Average number of clients per day and the frequency of turnover of the clients, and 375 (5) Number of employees, staff or volunteers, both total and expected to be on the 376 premises at any given time. 377 3. Prohibition: No provision of this section shall be construed to allow any use in a 378 closed school or church for retail, residential or industrial purposes, or any use involving any 379 type of correctional or institutional facility. 380 4. Ownership: The School Board or church shall remain the owner of the property during 381 the period of time for which the conditional use is granted and any change of ownership away 382 from the School Board or church shall immediately cause the conditional use to terminate. 383 5. Automatic Termination Of Use: If the School Board or church group determines that no 384 future public or religious use will be made of the building as a public school or church, the 385 conditional use as granted under this section shall immediately cease and the property shall 386 thereafter be used only for uses permitted in the zoning district. 387 6. Temporary Use: The conditional use provided by this section shall be temporary only. 388 The time of such use shall be subject to the decision of the Planning Commission based on its 389 consideration of the criteria specified in subsection B7 of this section. The Planning Commission 390 may authorize the conditional use for a period not to exceed five (5) years, which may be 391 renewed for additional periods not in excess of five (5) years. 392 7. Termination For Excess Use: If the Planning Commission determines that the conditional 393 use is being used substantially in excess of the plan for use submitted pursuant to subsection B2b 394 of this section, the Planning Commission may, after an informal hearing, revoke the conditional 395 use if it determines that the excess use is having a negative impact on the neighborhood. 396 397 SECTION 24. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.1 That Subsection 398 21A.44.060.A.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 399 Parking Location and Design: Generally: Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building 400 Served), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 401 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required 402 to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this 403 ordinance shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the building or use served, LEGISLATIVE 18 404 unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, "Off-Site Parking 405 Permitted", or 21A.55.020, “Planned Developments – Authority”. 406 407 SECTION 25. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.020. That 408 Section 21A.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Applicability) shall 409 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 410 411 21A.52.020 APPLICABILITY: 412 A. This chapter applies as indicated within each subsection. 413 B. The planned development process in Chapter 21A.55 is not required as indicated within 414 this chapter. 415 C. The administrative planned development process in Chapter 21A.55, and the 416 administrative design review process in Chapter 21A.59 may be applicable as indicated 417 within this chapter. 418 419 SECTION 26. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.030. That 420 Section 21A.52.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Relationship to Base 421 Zoning District and Overlay Zoning Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as 422 follows: 423 424 21A.52.030: RELATIONSHIP TO BASE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OVERLAY 425 ZONING DISTRICTS: 426 Unless otherwise indicated in this chapter, all base zoning district or overlay zoning district 427 standards and requirements take precedence except as indicated in this section. 428 429 SECTION 27. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.040. That 430 Section 21A.52.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Approval Process) 431 shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 432 433 21A.52.040: APPROVAL PROCESS: LEGISLATIVE 19 434 Unless specifically exempted or modified by this chapter, all requirements of this title shall 435 apply. 436 A. Zoning Incentives: Applicants using the zoning incentives in this chapter shall submit a 437 zoning incentives application and provide the following information: 438 1. The applicant's name, address, telephone number and interest in the property to which 439 the incentives shall apply; 440 2. The owner's name, address and telephone number, if different than the applicant, and 441 the owner's signed consent to the filing of the application; 442 3. The street address, tax parcel number and legal description of the subject property; 443 4. The zoning classification, zoning district boundaries and present use of the subject 444 property; 445 5. The location of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, accessory and 446 principal, showing the number of stories and height, dwelling type, if applicable, 447 major elevations and the total square footage of the floor area by proposed use and 448 any additional information required for site plan review set forth in Chapter 21A.58; 449 6. The total number of dwelling units in the project, the number of affordable units, the 450 number of bedrooms in the affordable units, the location of the affordable units, and 451 level of affordability; and 452 7. Any additional information required by Chapter 21A.59 design review or 21A.55 453 planned development, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this 454 chapter, as applicable; and 455 8. Any additional information the zoning administrator deems necessary to demonstrate 456 compliance with this chapter. 457 B. Preliminary approval shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications 458 for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, 459 a building permit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no permits shall be issued until final 460 approval is obtained pursuant to this Chapter. Preliminary approval shall be valid for a 461 period of one year unless complete building plans have been submitted to the Division of 462 Building Services. 463 C. Administrative design review and administrative planned development, where applicable, 464 shall be exempt from the application fees and noticing fees otherwise required pursuant 465 to Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55. 466 D. Following the approval of any administrative design review or planned development 467 application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the 468 approved design review application unless a modification is approved subject to the 469 process outlined in Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55, as applicable. 470 E. Final approval shall occur following the recording of the restrictive covenant. 471 F. Preliminary and final approvals shall be administrative approvals by the planning director 472 or the planning director's designee. 473 474 SECTION 28. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.A. That 475 Subsection 21A.52.050.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable 476 Housing Incentives: Purpose) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 20 477 478 21A.52.050 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES: 479 A. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section chapter are intended to encourage the 480 development of affordable housing. The provisions within this section are intended to 481 facilitate the construction of affordable housing by allowing more inclusive development 482 than would otherwise be permitted in the base zoning districts. Housing constructed using 483 the incentives is intended to be compatible in form with the neighborhood and provide for 484 safe and comfortable places to live and play. 485 486 SECTION 29. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3. 487 That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: 488 Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 489 490 3. Incentives in the CB Community Business, CC Corridor Commercial, CG General 491 Commercial, and I Institutional Zoning Districts: 492 a. The following housing types: row houses, sideways row houses, and cottage 493 developments are authorized provided the affordability requirements in 494 subsection b. are complied with;. 495 b. The minimum open space requirements in the I Institutional zoning district do 496 not apply. 497 c. To be eligible for the incentives listed in this subsection 3a., a development shall 498 meet the affordability requirements for Type C in Table 21A.52.050.G. 499 500 SECTION 30. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.52. That Chapter 501 21A.52 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended 502 to add a new Section 21A.52.060, with no other revisions to the chapter, to read as follows: 503 21A.52.060: BUILDING PRESERVATION INCENTIVES: 504 The provisions in this section provide optional incentives to development projects that include 505 the preservation of an existing building. The incentives located in Subsection 21A.52.060.A may 506 be combined with the incentives outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 507 A. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings: 508 509 1. Purpose: To allow additional land uses in buildings that generally contribute to the 510 character of the city so they can be redeveloped for economically viable uses. These LEGISLATIVE 21 511 buildings may be underutilized or have outlived their original use due to economic 512 conditions, size of the building, a substantial degree of deterioration of the property, 513 or other factors. Eligible buildings may hold historical or cultural significance or 514 contribute to the existing neighborhood fabric through their architectural features, 515 size, or previous use. 516 517 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to adaptive reuse of a building 518 that meets the eligibility standards in 21A.52.060.A.3. 519 520 3. Eligibility Standards: 521 a. The following buildings are eligible for the incentives in this subsection: 522 (1) Landmark Sites; 523 (2) Buildings individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places; 524 (3) Buildings designed and formerly used for schools, hospitals, places of 525 worship, or other similar institutional uses; and 526 (4) Buildings that the planning director has deemed significant based on the 527 structure’s association with events that have contributed to broad patterns of 528 history, association with lives of persons important in the city’s past, or 529 displays distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of 530 construction. 531 b. Exterior features that are important in defining the overall character of the 532 building shall be retained. 533 c. Exterior alterations to the eligible building shall meet the standards in 534 21A.34.020.G. 535 d. The proposed use is conducive to the preservation of the building. 536 e. A change of use to a residential use is not permitted in the OS (Open Space) 537 zoning district. 538 f.If the eligible building is located in a residential zoning district, and the existing 539 use is residential, a change of use to nonresidential is not permitted. 540 g. Properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay must obtain a Certificate 541 of Appropriateness in accordance with 21A.34.020. 542 4. Incentives: 543 a. Additional Uses: Unless prohibited by Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.a(1), any use 544 may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use in zoning districts where 545 Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings is listed in the land use 546 tables in Chapter 21A.33, subject to the provisions in this subsection and any 547 specific provisions applicable to the use in this title. Any conditional use shall be 548 reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards outlined in Chapter 21A.54. 549 (1) Prohibited Uses: A change of use to one of the following uses is prohibited: 550 Ambulance services (indoor and outdoor), amusement park, auditorium, bio- 551 medical facility, bus line station/terminal, bus line yard and repair facility, car 552 wash, check cashing/payday loan business, community correctional facility 553 (large and small), contractor’s yard/office, drive-through facility associated 554 with any use, equipment rental (indoor and outdoor), gas station, heliport, 555 hotel/motel, impound lot, intermodal transit passenger hub, jail, large wind 556 energy system, laundry and dry cleaning establishments, limousine service LEGISLATIVE 22 557 (large and small), heavy manufacturing, pet cemetery, recycling collection 558 station, sexually oriented business, sign painting/fabrication, storage 559 (outdoor), public storage (outdoor), wireless telecommunications facility, 560 homeless resource centers, and any other uses that are only allowed in the 561 manufacturing districts. 562 b. Parking and Loading: The following are the minimum off-street parking and 563 loading requirements for the eligible building. These minimums may be further 564 reduced with the alternatives to minimum parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 565 (1) Multi-Family: 0.5 off-street parking space per dwelling unit is required; 566 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 567 for the proposed use listed in the general context of the required off-street 568 parking table in 21A.44 may be reduced by 40%; 569 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 570 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 571 no additional parking shall be required; 572 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 573 c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements 574 of the zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In 575 the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 576 apply. 577 578 5. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 579 21A.52.060.A shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 580 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 581 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 582 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 583 with the land for the duration of the adaptive reuse and shall provide for the 584 following, without limitation: 585 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 586 conditions thereof; 587 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 588 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 589 important to the character of the building shall be preserved for the duration of the 590 adaptive reuse or if subject to 21A.34.020, indefinitely unless otherwise permitted 591 by the terms of a certificate of appropriateness; 592 c. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the potential 593 enforcement actions for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 594 595 6. Modifications to Approved Adaptive Reuse: Any modification to the use approved 596 under these incentives requires a new zoning incentives application. Any new 597 adaptive reuse shall also require a new zoning incentives application unless the new 598 use is permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the zoning district. 599 600 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection A, or the restrictive covenant on the 601 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.A.5, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 602 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for LEGISLATIVE 23 603 violations as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 604 21A.52.060.A.5, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 605 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 606 607 B. Preservation of a Principal Building: 608 609 1. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section are intended to encourage the 610 preservation of buildings, supporting city goals related to sustainability, 611 neighborhoods, economy, and housing. The provisions are designed to support 612 developments that include preserving an eligible building by allowing flexibility with 613 certain zoning regulations while still maintaining the unique urban fabric and 614 character of neighborhoods. 615 616 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to projects in all zoning districts 617 that preserve an existing principal building that meets the eligibility standards in 618 21A.52.060.B.3. These incentives may be applied to existing principal buildings and 619 new construction within the same development area. For the purposes of this 620 subsection, the development area may include multiple abutting lots or parcels. 621 622 3. Eligibility Standards: 623 a. Minimum Building Age: The existing building to be preserved shall be a 624 minimum of 50 years old. 625 b. Minimum Footprint of Eligible Building: The footprint of the eligible building to 626 be preserved covers a minimum of 25% of the development area. A lower 627 percentage may be considered by the planning director if the building has frontage 628 on a public street, contains a publicly accessible use such as retail, restaurant, or 629 entertainment, or would be highly visible from public spaces within the interior of 630 the site. 631 c. Retention of All Existing Principal Structures: In the FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R - 632 1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000, R-2, SR-1, SR-1A, SR-3, and all RMF zoning 633 districts, all existing principal structures included in the overall development area 634 shall be retained. 635 d. Modifications to Existing Building: A maximum of 25% of each street facing 636 building wall may be removed to accommodate modifications or additions. No 637 more than 50% of the building’s exterior walls may be removed. Portions of a 638 building wall with character defining architectural features shall not be removed. 639 e. Retention of Existing Active Commercial Uses: Eligible buildings with existing 640 active commercial uses with ground level street frontage are subject to the 641 following requirements. For the purpose of this subsection, active commercial 642 uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent 643 to a building and encourage pedestrian activity and walk-in traffic. Active uses 644 may include retail goods/service establishments, restaurants, bars, art and craft 645 studios, or other uses determined to be substantially similar in terms of activation 646 by the planning director. 647 (1) A minimum of 50% of the length shall be retained along the street frontage in 648 the existing building or be included as part of the new development. If LEGISLATIVE 24 649 included in the new development, the active commercial use shall have the 650 primary entrance on the street frontage with direct public access from the 651 street frontage. 652 (2) The existing depth of the active commercial use shall be maintained or a 653 minimum depth of 25 feet, whichever is less. 654 (3) These requirements do not apply to nonconforming active commercial uses 655 with ground level street frontage. 656 657 4. Incentives: 658 a. Planned Development Waived: A planned development is not required for the 659 following: 660 (1) More Than One Principal Building Per Lot: More than one principal building 661 per lot is allowed without having frontage along a public street. 662 (2) Lots without Frontage on a Public Street: Lots do not require frontage on a 663 public street if necessary cross access easements are provided. 664 b. Administrative Planned Development: The following are authorized through an 665 administrative planned development pursuant to the procedures and standards in 666 Chapter 21A.55. The minimum planned development size required by 667 21A.55.060 does not apply: 668 (1) Modification to the minimum yard requirements. 669 (2) Modification to the open space and landscaping requirements when the 670 modification specifically relates to preserving the existing building(s). 671 (3) Modifications to the provisions for awnings and canopies, balconies, patios, 672 and porches in Table 21A.36.020.B, Obstructions in Required Yards. 673 (4) Modifications to the parking location and setback requirements in Table 674 21A.44.060.A. 675 (5) Parking within the boundary of a planned development area but located on a 676 different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is allowed and is 677 not considered off-site parking. The parking must only serve the uses within 678 the planned development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions 679 of this title. 680 c.Minimum Lot Area, Width & Coverage: 681 (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 682 width tables of the zoning district does not apply. 683 (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 684 width tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning 685 districts: FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. 686 (3) RMF-30 zoning district: The minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 687 apply. 688 (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the 689 individual lot or parcel within the development area. 690 d.Height: Additional building height is authorized in zoning districts as indicated in 691 the following sections through administrative design review. The maximum 692 height per story of the additional building height incentive shall not exceed 12 693 feet. Administrative design review shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures 694 and standards in Chapter 21A.59. The additional height authorized by this LEGISLATIVE 25 695 subsection shall not be combined with the additional height authorized by 696 Subsection 21A.52.050, Affordable Housing Incentives. 697 698 (1) Residential districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive RMU-35 45’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RMU-45 55’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RMU 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RO 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 699 700 (2) Commercial Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive CB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CN May build one additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CC 45’ CG 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building for properties in the boundary described in 21A.26.070.G. CSHBD1 105’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CSHBD2 60’ and 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Transition 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Core 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 701 LEGISLATIVE 26 702 (3) Form-based districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 90’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-MU11 125’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN2 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SC 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SE 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN1 3 stories and 30’ in height. 703 704 (4) Downtown districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive D-2 120’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. D-3 180’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 705 706 (5) Other districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive GMU 180’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. MU 60’ provided that the additional height is for residential uses only. I Building heights in excess of 35' but not more than 75' provided, that for each foot of height over 35', each required yard shall be increased 1'. UI Building heights in excess of 75' but not more 120' provided that the additional height is supported by the master plan and compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. OS – Lots greater than 4 acres Building heights in excess of 45’ up to 60’ provided that for each foot of height over 45’, each required yard and landscaped yard shall be increased by 1’. 707 LEGISLATIVE 27 708 709 e. Administrative design review is permitted for the following: 710 (1) Buildings in the CSHBD1 or CSHBD2 zoning district that exceed 20,000 711 square feet in size. 712 (2) Buildings in the CB zoning district that exceed 7,500 gross square feet of floor 713 area for a first-floor footprint or in excess of 15,000 gross square feet floor 714 area. 715 f. Parking: The following are the minimum off-street parking requirements unless a 716 lesser requirement is listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44. 717 These minimums may be further reduced with the alternatives to minimum 718 parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 719 (1) Residential: 0.5 space per dwelling unit for multi-family; 1 space per dwelling 720 unit for all other residential uses. 721 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 722 for the proposed use listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44 723 may be reduced by 40%. 724 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 725 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 726 no additional parking shall be required. 727 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 728 729 g. Minimum Required Yards: The minimum required yards may apply to the 730 perimeter of the development area and not to the individual lot or parcel within 731 the development area. 732 733 5. Design Standards for New Construction: Unless a stricter design standard related to 734 each of the following is included in the base zone or Chapter 21A.37, the following 735 design standards are required for all zones except single and two-family zoning 736 districts: 737 a. Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, 50% of any street facing 738 facade shall be clad in durable materials. Durable materials include stone, brick, 739 masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that 740 includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, 741 weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials 742 may be used for the remainder of the facade facing the street. Other materials 743 proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of 744 the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is 745 appropriate for the proposed location on the building. 746 b. Glass: The surface area of the façade of each floor facing a street must contain a 747 minimum of 50% glass. If the ground level of the building is occupied by 748 residential uses that face the street the specified minimum glass requirement may 749 be reduced to 25%. 750 c. Maximum Length of a Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall 751 uninterrupted by windows or doors at the ground floor level along any street 752 facing façade is 15 feet. Emergency exit doors and doors to access structured 753 parking or utility equipment shall not count as an interruption. LEGISLATIVE 28 754 d. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: 755 (1) The maximum length of each street facing building facade shall not exceed 756 100 feet in the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 districts. 757 (2) The maximum length of each street facing building façade shall not 758 exceed 175 feet in all other zoning districts. 759 e. Building Entrances: At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is 760 required for every street facing facade. Additional operable building entrances 761 shall be required on street facing facades every 40 feet for nonresidential uses and 762 every 75 feet for residential uses. All units adjacent to a public street shall have 763 the primary entrance on the street facing façade of the building with an 764 unenclosed entry porch, canopy or awning feature. 765 f. Garage Doors Facing Street: Garage doors are prohibited on the façade of the 766 building that is parallel to, or located along, a public street. 767 g. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment shall be screened 768 from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of 769 siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural 770 design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location 771 restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020B, “Obstructions In 772 Required Yards”. 773 774 6. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 775 21A.52.060.B shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 776 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 777 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 778 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 779 with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: 780 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 781 conditions thereof; 782 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 783 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 784 important to the character of the building shall be preserved during the term; 785 c. Projects that apply the incentives to new buildings on the development site shall 786 guarantee retention of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives for a 787 minimum term of 30 years or, if the eligible building is subject to 21A.34.020, 788 indefinitely unless otherwise permitted by the terms of a certificate of 789 appropriateness after such 30 year period; 790 d. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the city’s potential 791 remedies for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 792 793 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection B, or the restrictive covenant on the 794 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.B.6, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 795 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for violations 796 as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 797 21A.52.060.B.6, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 798 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.B. Financial remedies for a 799 violation of the covenant may include liquidated damages representing a reasonable LEGISLATIVE 29 800 estimate of the value of the incentives, plus other associated damages valued up to 801 20% of the tax assessed value of the preserved building over the three preceding 802 years. 803 804 805 SECTION 31. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.020. That 806 Section 21A.55.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Authority) shall 807 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 808 809 21A.55.020: AUTHORITY: 810 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with 811 modifications, deny, or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific 812 zoning standards outlined in 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying 813 provisions in 21A.52.060.B in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in 814 this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 815 located. 816 817 B. Planning Commission Review: The Pplanning Ccommission may approve planned 818 developments for uses listed in the tables of permitted and conditional uses for each 819 category of zoning district or districts. The approval shall be in accordance with the 820 standards and procedures set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the 821 district in which the property is located. 822 In approving a planned development, the Pplanning Ccommission may change, alter, 823 modify or waive the following provisions of this title: 824 1A. Zoning Aand Subdivision Regulations: Any provisions of this title or of the Ccity's 825 subdivision regulations as they apply to the proposed planned development except 826 that the Pplanning Ccommission cannot approve a use that is not allowed in the 827 zoning district in which the planned development is located, with the exception of 828 off-site parking as further described in this section. 829 2B. Off-Site Parking: Off-site pParking within the boundary of a planned development 830 area, but located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is 831 in zoning districts where off-site parking is not an allowed and not considered off- 832 site parking use. The parking must only serve the uses be located within the planned 833 development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions of this title. 834 3C. Building Height: Up to five feet (5') of additional building height, except in the FR, 835 R-1, SR, or R-2 Zzoning Ddistricts where additional building height cannot be 836 approved through the planned development process. 837 4D. Density: Residential planned developments shall not exceed the density limitation 838 of the zoning district where the planned development is proposed except as allowed 839 below. The calculation of planned development density may include open space that 840 is provided as an amenity to the planned development. Public streets located within LEGISLATIVE 30 841 or adjacent to a planned development shall not be included in the planned 842 development area for the purpose of calculating density. 843 a1. In the RMF Zzoning Ddistricts and on lots 0.20 acres or more in size, 844 developments that change a nonconforming commercial use to a residential use 845 that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density limitations of 846 the zoning district when approved as a planned development. 847 848 SECTION 32. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.030. That 849 Section 21A.55.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Planning 850 Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 851 852 21A.55.030: PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 853 854 A. No Presumption Oof Approval: A request for a planned development does not constitute 855 an assurance or presumption that such planned development will be approved. Rather, 856 each proposed planned development shall be evaluated on an individual basis, in relation 857 to its compliance with the standards and factors set forth in this chapter and with the 858 standards for the zoning district in which it is located, in order to determine whether the 859 planned development is appropriate at a particular location. 860 861 B. Approval: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 862 planned developments, may approve a planned development as proposed or may impose 863 conditions necessary or appropriate for the planned development to comply with the 864 standards and factors set forth in this chapter. 865 866 C. Denial: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 867 planned developments, may deny an application for a planned development if it finds that 868 the proposal does not meet the intent of the base zoning district, does not meet the 869 purpose of this chapter, or is not consistent with the standards and factors as set forth in 870 this chapter. 871 872 873 SECTION 33. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.040. That 874 Section 21A.55.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Procedures) 875 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 876 877 21A.55.040: PROCEDURES: 878 LEGISLATIVE 31 879 A. Application: An application for a planned development shall be made on an application 880 form prepared by the zoning administrator and accompanied by applicable fees as noted 881 in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible 882 for payment of all mailing fees established for required public noticing. The applicant 883 must file an application for planned development approval with the Planning Director. A 884 complete application shall contain at least the following information submitted by the 885 applicant, unless certain information is determined by the zoning administrator Planning 886 Director to be inapplicable or unnecessary to appropriately evaluate the application. The 887 application submittal shall include one paper copy and one digital copy: 888 889 1. A complete description of the proposed planned development including the zoning 890 regulations being modified in the planned development and the planning objectives 891 being met; 892 2. When the proposed planned development includes provisions for common open space 893 or recreational facilities, a statement describing the provision to be made for the care 894 and maintenance of such open space or recreational facilities; 895 3. A written statement with supporting graphics showing how the proposed planned 896 development is compatible with other property in the neighborhood; 897 4. Plans, as required pursuant to sSection 21A.58.060 of this title, with the exception of 898 the number of copies required; 899 5. Architectural graphics including floor plans, elevations, profiles and cross sections; 900 6. A preliminary subdivision plat, if required; 901 7. Traffic impact analysis, where required by the City Transportation Division; and 902 8. Other information or documentation the zoning administratorPlanning Director may 903 deem necessary for proper review and analysis of a particular application. 904 905 B. Determination Oof Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a planned 906 development, the zoning administratorPlanning Director shall make a determination of 907 completeness of the application pursuant to sSection 21A.10.010 of this title. 908 909 C. Public Notification and Engagement: 910 911 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an 912 application that qualifies for administrative review, the planning director shall 913 provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10.020.B. 914 915 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: 916 a. Applications subject to planning commission review are subject to the notification 917 requirements of Chapter 2.60. 918 b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements 919 found in Chapter 21A.10. 920 921 Staff Report: Upon completing a site plan review and receiving recommendations from 922 applicable City department(s)/division(s), a staff report evaluating the planned development 923 application shall be prepared by the Planning Division and forwarded to the applicant and the 924 Planning Commission. LEGISLATIVE 32 925 926 D. Public Hearing: The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review the 927 planned development application in accordance with the standards and procedures set 928 forth in chapter 21A.10 of this title. 929 930 E. Planning Commission Action: Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission 931 shall decide, on the basis of the standards contained in section 21A.55.050 of this chapter 932 whether to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the application. 933 934 F. Notification Of Decision: The Planning Director shall notify the applicant of the decision 935 of the Planning Commission in writing, accompanied by one copy of the submitted plans 936 marked to show such decision and a copy of the motion approving, approving with 937 modifications, or denying the development plan application. 938 939 940 SECTION 34. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.050. That 941 Section 21A.55.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Standards for 942 Planned Developments) shall be, and hereby is amended, as to the preamble only with 943 Subsections A through G unchanged: 944 945 21A.55.050: STANDARDS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: 946 947 The Pplanning Ccommission, or the planning director in the case of an administrative planned 948 development, may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a planned development based upon 949 written findings of fact according to each of the following standards. It is the responsibility of the 950 applicant to provide written and graphic evidence demonstrating compliance with the following 951 standards: 952 953 954 SECTION 35. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.070. That 955 Section 21A.55.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Appeal of the 956 Planning Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 957 958 21A.55.070: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 959 Any person adversely affected by a final decision of the Pplanning Ccommission or planning 960 director in the case of administrative planned developments, on an application for a planned 961 development may appeal to the Aappeals Hhearing Oofficer in accordance with the provisions LEGISLATIVE 33 962 of cChapter 21A.16 of this title. The filing of the appeal shall not stay the pending the outcome 963 of the appeal, except as provided for under sSection 21A.16.030F of this title. 964 965 SECTION 36. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.080. That 966 Section 21A.55.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Time Limit on 967 Approved Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 968 969 21A.55.080: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 970 No planned development approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless a 971 building permit has been issued or complete building plans have been submitted to the Division 972 of Building Services and Licensing. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case 973 of an administrative planned development, may grant an extension of a planned development for 974 up to one additional year when the applicant is able to demonstrate no change in circumstance 975 that would result in an unmitigated impact. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the 976 expiration of the planned development approval. 977 978 SECTION 37. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.090. That 979 Section 21A.55.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Effect of 980 Approval of Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 981 982 21A.55.090: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 983 The approval of a proposed planned development by the Pplanning Ccommission or planning 984 director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall not authorize the 985 establishment or extension of any use nor the development, construction, reconstruction, 986 alteration or moving of any building or structure, but shall authorize the preparation, filing and 987 processing of applications for any permits or approvals that may be required by the regulations 988 of the Ccity, including, but not limited to, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy and 989 subdivision approval. 990 991 SECTION 38. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.100. That 992 Section 21A.55.100 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Modifications 993 to Development Plan) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 34 994 995 21A.55.100: MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 996 Following planned development approval, the development plan approved by the Pplanning 997 Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall 998 constitute the site design in relation to building placement and design, landscaping, mobility and 999 circulation elements, and any elements that were approved as zoning modifications through the 1000 planned development process. Modifications to the development plan may be allowed pursuant 1001 to this section. 1002 A. New Application Required Ffor Modifications Aand Amendments: No substantial 1003 Mmodifications or amendments shall be made in the construction, development or use 1004 without a new application under subject to the provisions of this section.title. Minor 1005 modifications or amendments may be made subject to written approval of the Planning 1006 Director and the date for completion may be extended by the Planning Commission upon 1007 recommendation of the Planning Director. 1008 B. Minor Modifications: The Pplanning Ddirector may authorize minor modifications to the 1009 approved development plan pursuant to the provisions for modifications to an approved 1010 site plan as set forth in chapter 21A.58 of this title when such modifications appear 1011 necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations necessary to comply with an 1012 adopted building, fire, or engineering code or standard or when the modification complies 1013 with the applicable standards in the underlying zoning district or overlay district. Such 1014 minor modifications shall be limited to the following elements: 1015 1. Adjusting the distance as shown on the approved development plan between any 1016 one structure or group of structures, and any other structure or group of structures, 1017 or any vehicular circulation element or any boundary of the site; 1018 2. Adjusting the location of any open space; 1019 3. Adjusting any final grade; 1020 4. Altering the types of landscaping elements and their arrangement within the 1021 required landscaping buffer area; 1022 5. Signs; 1023 6. Relocation or construction of accessory structures that comply with the provisions 1024 of 21A.40 and any applicable accessory structure regulations; or 1025 7. Additions which comply with the lot and bulk requirements of the underlying 1026 zone. 1027 Such minor modifications shall be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title and 1028 the development plan as approved pursuant to this chapter and shall be the minimum 1029 necessary to overcome the particular difficulty comply with the standards of the 1030 underlying zoning district or the applicable building, fire, or engineering code or standard LEGISLATIVE 35 1031 and shall not be approved if such modifications would result in a violation of any 1032 standard or requirement of this title. A minor modification shall not be approved if the 1033 modification reduces a required building setback, authorizes an increase in lot coverage, 1034 or increases building height. 1035 C. Major Modifications: Any modifications to the approved development plan not 1036 authorized by sSubsection B of this section shall be considered to be a major 1037 modification. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an 1038 administrative planned development, shall give notice to all property owners consistent 1039 with notification requirements located in chapter 21A.10 of this title. The Pplanning 1040 Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, 1041 may approve an application for a major modification to the approved development plan, 1042 not requiring a modification of written conditions of approval or recorded easements, 1043 upon finding that any changes in the plan as approved will be in substantial conformity 1044 with the approved development plan. If the commission or planning director in the case 1045 of an administrative planned development, determines that a major modification is not in 1046 substantial conformity with the approved development plan, then the commission or 1047 planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall review the 1048 request in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. 1049 D. Other Modifications: Any modification to the planned development that complies with 1050 the standards of the underlying zoning district or overlay zoning district is allowed 1051 provided the modification does not violate a condition of approval or other requirement 1052 placed on the planned development as part of the approval of the application and required 1053 permits and approvals are obtained. 1054 1055 SECTION 39. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.59.020.A. That 1056 Subsection 21A.59.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Review: Authority: 1057 Administrative Review) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1058 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, 1059 deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when 1060 proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing 1061 structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, 1062 Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized in the specific zoning district 1063 elsewhere in this title. 1064 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director 1065 finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, 1066 the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, 1067 the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other 1068 buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, LEGISLATIVE 36 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review objectives. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. SECTION 40. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That 1091 Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall 1092 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1093 a. Amending the definition of “ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A LANDMARK 1094 BUILDING.” That the definition shall be amended to read as follows: 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 ADAPTIVE REUSE FOR ADDITTIONAL USES IN ELIGIBLE OF A LANDMARK BUILDINGS: The process of reusing a building for a purpose other than which it was built or designed for landmark buildings original use is no longer feasible. Other land uses, in addition to those specifically listed in the land use tables, may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use subject to the provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.A. b. Amending the definition of “PARKING, OFF SITE.” That the definition of 1102 “PARKING, OFF SITE” shall be amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 37 1103 PARKING, OFF SITE: An off-street parking area intended to serve one or more uses and that is 1104 located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve. Parking approved within 1105 the boundary of a planned development that only serves uses within the planned development 1106 area is not considered off-site parking. 1107 c. Repealing the definition “HOUSE MUSEUM IN A LANDMARK SITE” as 1108 follows: 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 HOUSE MUSEUM IN LANDMARK SITE: A dwelling unit which is converted from its original principal use as a dwelling unit to a staffed institution dedicated to educational, aesthetic or historic purposes. Such museum should include a staff who commands an appropriate body of special knowledge necessary to convey the historical, aesthetic or architectural attributes of the building and its collections to the general public. Such staff should also have the ability to reach museological decisions consonant with the experience of his or her peers and have access to and acquaintance with the literature of the field. Such museum should maintain either regular hours or be available for appointed visits such that access is reasonably convenient to the public. SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 1119 first publication. 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 2024. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , CHAIRPERSON 1125 1126 1127 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 1139 1140 1141 1142 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) LEGISLATIVE 38 1143 Bill No. of 2024. 1144 Published: . 1145 Adaptive Reuse Preservation Incentives_Opt1(legislative)v1 1146 3.CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00155 February 16, 2023 Mayor Mendenhall signed the petition initiation April 17, 2023 Initial information posted to the city’s online open house webpage April 20, 2023 Initial information emailed to recognized organizations, focus group and stakeholders, for the purpose of gathering early feedback to inform the draft ordinance July 18, 2023 All recognized organizations were sent the 45-day required notice for text amendments that included a draft ordinance for review. Focus group and stakeholders were also provided with updated information with a draft ordinance for review August 3, 2023 A briefing was held with the Historic Landmark Commission on the proposal August 21, 2023 The proposal was presented to the Sugar House Land Use Committee. September 27, 2023 The Planning Commission held a briefing to review the proposal October 11, 2023 The proposal was presented to the Business Advisory Board October 19, 2023 Public hearing notice posted to city and state websites and a notice of the hearing was posted in the following public libraries: Main, Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch, Marmalade, Fairpark, Glendale and Sprague. October 26, 2023 Staff report for Historic Landmark Commission hearing posted to Planning’s website November 2, 2023 The Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to City Council February 15, 2024 Public hearing notice posted city and state websites and a notice of the hearing was posted in the following public libraries: Main, Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch, Marmalade, Fairpark, Glendale and Sprague. February 21, 2024 Staff report for Planning Commission hearing posted to Planning’s website. February 28, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to City Council April 3, 2024 Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office April 22, 2024 Final ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office April 23, 2024 Transmitted to CAN Administration 4.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00155 – A petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall for a text amendment that would make changes to the zoning ordinance to support adaptive reuse and preservation of existing buildings. The goal of this proposed text amendment is to remove zoning barriers that prevent the reuse of buildings and offer zoning incentives to encourage a building to be reused rather than demolished. The proposed amendments involve multiple chapters of the Zoning Ordinance and would apply citywide. DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions related to this proposal, please call Amy Thompson at 801-535-7281 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail amy.thompson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00155. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 5.PETITION INITIATION To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Nick Norris, Planning Director From: Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director Date: February 10, 2023 Re: Initiate Petition to Amend Text in the Zoning Ordinance to Establish Regulations for the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings The Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a petition directing the Planning Division to make changes to the zoning ordinance to support adaptive reuse of existing buildings. The overall purpose of these zoning changes is to support and implement existing City plans and policies related to housing, historic preservation, sustainability and economic development. Adaptive reuse is both a sustainable practice and a vital a planning tool that aids in meeting the City’s various goals. The adaptive reuse of an existing structure retains a buildings original form while bypassing wasteful demolition. This process keeps substantial amounts of materials out of landfills and reduces energy consumption. Additionally, preserving these buildings which are often times historic or contain elements of unique architectural detailing, helps maintain neighborhood character and breathes new life into buildings that contribute to neighborhood fabric. Adaptive reuse allows existing buildings to serve our community for generations to come while continuing to tell the story of those who came before us. As part of this petition the Planning Division will work with Sustainability to find ways to improve the function and performance of existing buildings to reduce their environmental impact in exchange for relaxing or modifying zoning regulations that may deter or prohibit the reuse of existing buildings. The purpose of this zoning text amendment is to: •Create a mechanism to allow for the adaptive reuse of buildings while maintaining and protecting the neighborhood’s historic built form and character; •Identify City codes and policies that effectively serve as barriers to the adaptive reuse of existing buildings; •Identify a process for reviewing adaptive reuse projects; and, •Identify possible incentives for projects that include an adaptive reuse component such as modifications to setbacks, height, density, parking, lot width and lot coverage. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the City adoption process for zoning text amendments, which includes citizen input and public hearings with the Historic Landmark Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. Changes will be made to Title 21A: Zoning Ordinance but other chapters within the city code may also be changed if identified as necessary. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Please contact me at 385-214-5311or michaela.oktav@slc.gov.com if you have any questions. TI1ank you. C-011cm·rence to initiate tlte zoning text amendment petition as noted aboue. 02/16/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date •Page2 6.ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From:Turner Bitton To:Planning Public Comments Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments for Tonight"s Meeting Date:Wednesday, February 28, 2024 5:02:56 PM Hello, I’m writing on behalf of SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors to express our comments on items on tonight’s agenda. I have written out each of our comments below to correspond with each agenda item that we would like to submit comments on: 1) Parking Text Amendment: PLNPCM2023-00646 SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors strongly supports this proposal and encourages the planning commission to approve the proposal. Salt Lake City continues to need more housing, and the parking amendment is a way of preserving existing housing stock and preventing the creation of more unnecessary parking. In short, the proposal prioritizes people over parking and reflects our shared values. 2) Adaptive Reuse Text Amendment: PLNPCM2023-00155 SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors strongly supports the proposed adaptive reuse text amendments and thanks the planning staff for their comprehensive approach to the issue. Older buildings contribute to the culture, health, and vitality of neighborhoods. The proposal is thoughtfully crafted in a way that will provide new housing opportunities and types while also enhancing Salt Lake City's built environment. We encourage the planning commission to approve the proposal. —— Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in and for all of your work. Thank you, Turner C. Bitton (he/him) Executive Director SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors (801) 564-3860 www.slcneighbors.org _______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL jill love Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date Received: 05/02/2024 Date sent to Council: 05/02/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 05/02/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT: Text Amendment - Zoning Incentives for Adaptive Reuse and Preservation of Buildings STAFF CONTACT: Amy Thompson, Planning Manager amy.thompson@slcgov.com or 801-535-7281 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This is a petition that was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to make changes to the zoning ordinance to both encourage and support the adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings. As the Salt Lake Valley continues to grow, the City’s older neighborhoods and buildings face increasing pressure for redevelopment, presenting both challenges and opportunities. This proposal addresses barriers that currently prevent the reuse of existing buildings and introduces incentives into the zoning ordinance to encourage buildings to be retained rather than demolished. The proposed amendments would apply citywide. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 Preservation of a Principal Building – 21A.52.060.B (“B Incentives”) To assist in developing the amendments, planning staff conducted research on several cities that have adopted ordinances that offer incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of existing buildings. Key features that were researched include location of the program (certain neighborhoods, specific zones, etc.), eligibility criteria, goals, and the types of incentives offered. Additionally, a focus group was created to help staff better understand current challenges and barriers to utilizing existing buildings. The focus group was largely made up of architects and developers, some of which have specific experience with these types of projects. Additionally, staff worked closely with the City’s Sustainability Division and Economic Development/Business Development on the proposal. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: The proposed ordinance changes would be in Chapter 21A.52, Zoning Incentives. The proposal creates a new section within that chapter, “Building Preservation Incentives”, which is separated into two sub- sections, “Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings” (21A.52.060.A), and “Preservation of a Principal Building” (21A.52.060.B). Each sub-section is discussed in greater detail below. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings – 21A.52.060.A (“A Incentives”) The “A Incentives” are primarily a use incentive to allow for flexibility of uses in eligible buildings, which usually include buildings that hold high artistic, historic, or cultural value, or large underutilized structures that are part of the neighborhood fabric. The current zoning ordinance for adaptive reuse of a landmark site allows nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential zoning district, subject to meeting standards related to preserving building character and neighborhood compatibility. The proposed ordinance expands on this current process with the following changes: •Broadens eligibility to include buildings that are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places, buildings formerly used for churches, schools, or hospitals, and other culturally or historically significant buildings. •Allows residential uses in addition to the nonresidential uses already allowed through this process. Additionally, the proposal would allow for residential uses in eligible buildings in the Public Lands (PL) and Institutional (I) zones where the only residential use currently allowed is living quarters for a caretaker or security guard. •Prohibit certain uses. Impactful uses were identified as prohibited because of their potential for negative impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and to the eligible building. •Removes minimum square footage requirement. The current building square footage minimum of 7,000 square feet is a significant obstacle to qualify for adaptive reuse incentives. The “B Incentives” apply to the eligible building being preserved and can also apply to any new construction on the same development site. In contrast to the “A Incentives,” this incentive is not a use incentive; these “B Incentives” are zoning modifications to the base zoning requirements for uses allowed in the zone. Projects that utilize the incentives in this subsection will be required to adhere to specific design standards for the new construction, retain existing active commercial uses on site, and enter into a restrictive covenant ensuring the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives is retained for at least 30 years. Eligibility: The “B Incentives” apply to new development projects that preserve a building that is at least 50 years old and covers a minimum of 25% of the development site; a lower percentage may be considered in certain circumstances. Summary of “B Incentives” •Removes the planned development requirement for modifications that are commonly requested through this process but are generally straightforward such as creating lots without street frontage and having buildings on the same parcel without all buildings having public street frontage. •Includes the addition of an Administrative Planned Development process for certain zoning modifications to allow for a more streamlined review process for eligible projects. •Removes minimum lot area and width requirements for all zones except single family zoning districts. •Includes additional building height in various zoning districts through administrative design review. Currently, there is no height incentive being offered in the single, two-family and RMF zoning districts. •Reduces parking for eligible projects. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL Both the Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission held public hearings to review the proposed text amendment and unanimously forwarded a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council. Following these recommendations, staff identified the following for Council consideration. •“B Incentive” Building Age Eligibility – The draft ordinance presented at the public hearings includes language that eligible buildings must be a minimum of 50 years old. Some planning commissioners expressed concerns with a rolling date and the ability for later period buildings (1980’s/1990’s) to become eligible for the incentives in the near future – typically, the development pattern of later eras may not be something worth preserving. Instead of the eligibility language “at least 50 years old,” the council could consider fixed date language that requires eligible buildings to be built prior to 1976. •Design Standards for New Construction Utilizing the “B Incentives” – Unless a stricter design standard is required in the Design Standards chapter for the zoning district the property is located in, projects utilizing the incentives have to meet specific design standards outlined in the proposed ordinance. Staff is recommending some additional changes to the following design standards in the proposal: o Upper Floor Glass – The draft ordinance reviewed by the planning commission requires the surface area of the facade of each floor to contain a minimum of 50% glass, which can be reduced on the ground level for residential uses to 25%. After looking at this closer, staff is of the opinion that the 50% threshold is too high for the upper levels of the building. Currently, only the Downtown zones and the Gateway Mixed Use (GMU) zones have an upper-level glass requirement of 50% and it is difficult for projects in those zones to meet the existing requirement without a request for a design review modification. The CG zone requires 25%, the FB-UN and RMF-30 zones require 15%, and the rest of the zones do not have an upper floor glass requirement. Staff is recommending reducing the upper floor glazing requirement to 20% for projects that use the incentives. Zones that have a higher % requirement in the Design Standards Chapter (21A.37) will still be subject to the higher standard. Staff is also recommending adding some clarifying language, so the glass requirements are consistent with the design standards chapter regarding the location of ground floor glass (between 3-8 FT on the building) and unobstructed visibility into the space. o Building Entrances – Added language to the building entrances design standard to address that entry features (un-enclosed entry porch, portico, awning or canopy, or emphasized doorway) for required building entrances need to meet the description in 21A.37.050.P for these entry features. The above recommendations are reflected in ordinance version 2 if the Council decides they would like these changes incorporated. If the Council does not want these changes incorporated, they have been left out of ordinance version 1. PUBLIC PROCESS: Open House: On April 17, 2023, a virtual open house page was created on Planning’s website and published via listserv. The initial information provided an introduction to the proposal to gather feedback early on in the process, and information was continually updated with revised draft ordinances and updated information throughout the process. Initial Outreach: On April 20, 2023, all Salt Lake City recognized organizations, focus group members, and stakeholders, were sent initial information for the purpose of gathering early feedback to inform the draft ordinance. Recognized Organizations: On July 18, 2023, the required 45-day notice and draft ordinance was sent to all recognized organizations for feedback. Community Council Meetings: On August 21, 2023, at the request of the chair, staff attended the Sugar House Land Use Committee meeting to discuss the proposed text amendment and answer any questions from the community. Comments Received: •Comments from Recognized Organizations: The East Liberty Park Community Organization & and the Sugar House Community Council provided letters in support of the proposal. The Sugar House Community Council did express concerns with reducing parking as an incentive. •Public Comments: Staff received four public comments in support of the proposal. Historic Landmark Commission Public Hearing: On November 2, 2023, the Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. No one spoke during the public hearing. Planning Commission Public Hearing: On February 28, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. One person spoke in favor of the proposal at the public hearing. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION (HLC) RECORDS (click each item to access): Briefing - August 3, 2023: •HLC Agenda •HLC Briefing Memo •HLC Minutes Public Hearing - November 2, 2023: •HLC Agenda •HLC Staff Report •HLC Minutes •HLC Meeting Video PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) RECORDS (click each item to access): Briefing – September 27, 2023 •PC Agenda •PC Briefing Memo •PC Minutes •PC Meeting Video Public Hearing – February 28, 2024 •PC Agenda •PC Staff Report •PC Minutes •PC Meeting Video EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance - Version 2 2) Ordinance – Version 1 3) Project Chronology 4) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 5) Petition Initiation 6) Public Comments Received After Publication of the Staff Report 1.ORDINANCE (VERSION 2) LEGISLATIVE 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings) 6 7 An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City 8 Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings pursuant to 9 Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155. 10 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning 11 Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin 12 Mendenhall to amend the zoning code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and 13 preservation of buildings (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155); and 14 WHEREAS, at its February 28, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 15 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.015.A. That 21 Subsection 21A.10.015.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 22 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Engagement: Land Use Projects Subject to 23 Public Engagement) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 24 A. Land Use Projects Subject to Public Engagement: The following are considered land use 25 projects for purposes of this chapter and are subject to the public engagement process and 26 requirements herein: 27 28 1. Request for an alley/street closure or vacation; 29 2. Amendments to Title 21A; 30 3. Conditional use applications; LEGISLATIVE 2 31 4. Design review applications, that are subject to review by the planning commission as 32 provided in Chapter 21A.59; 33 5. Applications to demolish one or more landmark sites or contributing structures 34 located within a local historic district; 35 6. Master plans, including amendments, to be adopted by the city council; 36 7. Requests for certificates of appropriateness required for new construction of principal 37 structures, except for single family and two family dwellings; 38 8. Planned development applications that are subject to review by the planning 39 commission as provided in Chapter 21A.55; and 40 9. Zoning map amendments. 41 42 43 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.020.B. That 44 Subsection 21A.10.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 45 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Hearing Notice Requirements: Special 46 Noticing Requirements for Certain Administrative Approvals) shall be, and hereby is amended to 47 read as follows: 48 B. Special Noticing Requirements for Administrative Approvals: 49 50 1. Notice of Application for Design Review and Planned Development: 51 52 a. Notification: At least twelve (12) days before a land use decision is made for an 53 administrative design review application as authorized in Chapter 21A.59 of this 54 title, or an administrative planned development as authorized by Chapter 21A.55 55 of this title, the planning director shall provide written notice to the following: 56 (1) All owners and identifiable tenants of the subject property, land abutting the 57 subject property, and land located directly across the street from the subject 58 property. In identifying the owners and tenants of the land the city shall use 59 the Salt Lake City geographic information system records. 60 (2) Recognized community organization(s) in which the subject property is 61 located. 62 63 b. Contents of the Notice of Application: The notice shall generally describe the 64 subject matter of the application, where the public may review the application, the 65 expected date when the planning director will authorize a final land use decision, 66 and the procedures to appeal the land use decision. 67 68 c. End of Notification Period: If the planning director receives comments identifying 69 concerns related to the design review application not complying with the 70 requirements of Chapter 21A.59, or the planned development not complying with LEGISLATIVE 3 71 the requirements of Chapter 21A.55, the planning director may refer the matter to 72 the planning commission for their review and decision on the application. 73 74 75 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.S. That 76 Subsection 21A.24.010.S of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 77 Provisions: Adaptive Reuse of a Landmark Building in Residential Districts) shall be, and hereby 78 is amended to read as follows: 79 80 S. Compliance with Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential zoning 81 districts shall comply with Section 9.28.040, “Noises Prohibited.”Adaptive Reuse Of A 82 Landmark Building In Residential Districts: 83 1. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the adaptive reuse of a landmark site in a residential 84 district is to preserve landmark sites as defined in subsection 21A.34.020B of this title. In some 85 instances these sites have outlived their original use due to economic conditions, size of the 86 building, and/or a substantial degree of deterioration of the historic property. Such sites, 87 however, still contribute to the welfare, property and education of the people of Salt Lake City 88 because of their historic, architectural or cultural significance. The Planning Commission shall 89 consider the allowance of a nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential district 90 according to the qualifying provisions outlined in subsection S2a of this section and pursuant 91 to chapter 21A.54 of this title, in order to ensure that the residential character of the surrounding 92 environment is preserved. 93 2. Conditional Use Required: Where authorized by this title as shown in 94 section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of 95 this title, landmark sites in any residential district may be used for certain nonresidential uses. 96 a. Qualifying Provisions: In order to qualify for conditional use review by the 97 Planning Commission under section 21A.54.080, "Standards For Conditional Uses", of 98 this title, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with the following: 99 (1) The building is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City 100 register of cultural resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the 101 City accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 102 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the designation 103 and conditional use applications together. 104 (2) The landmark building shall have a minimum of seven thousand (7,000) 105 square feet of floor area, excluding accessory buildings. 106 (3) The new use will require minimal change as these features are important 107 in defining the overall historic character of the building and environment. 108 (4) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site. LEGISLATIVE 4 109 (5) Significant archaeological resources affected by the project shall be 110 protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures 111 shall be undertaken. 112 (6) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. 113 (7) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of 114 craftsmanship that characterize the property shall be preserved. 115 (8) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 116 structure or site including mature landscaping. 117 (9) The change in use from residential to nonresidential is necessary due to 118 the excessive size of the landmark site for residential uses allowed in the residential 119 district, and/or demonstration that the building cannot reasonably be used for its 120 original intended use. 121 (10) The proposed use will not have a material net cumulative adverse 122 impact on the neighborhood or the City as a whole by considering the following: 123 (A) The spatial distribution of: 124 (i) Business licenses issued for properties located within three 125 hundred feet (300') of any property line and the block frontage on both sides 126 of the street between 100 series addresses; and 127 (ii) Previously approved conditional uses for nonresidential uses 128 in landmark sites within the same planning community, as shown on a map of 129 planning communities maintained by the Zoning Administrator. 130 (B) Impacts on neighboring properties including, but not limited to: 131 (i) Traffic; 132 (ii) Parking; 133 (iii) Signs; 134 (iv) Lighting; 135 (v) Removal of landscaping; and 136 (vi) For the purposes of evaluating subsections S2a(10)(B)(i) 137 through S2a(10)(B)(v) of this section, professionally prepared impact studies 138 shall not be required unless specifically requested by the Zoning 139 Administrator; 140 (vii) Noise, fumes or odors; 141 b. Credit For On Street Parking: Some or all of the off street parking spaces 142 required in section 21A.44.030 of this title may be met by the provision of on street 143 spaces. Such credit shall require the site plan review approval. Requests for on street 144 parking shall meet the following requirements: LEGISLATIVE 5 145 (1) All on street parking facilities shall be designed in conformance with the 146 standards established by the City Transportation Engineer; 147 (2) Prior to approving any requests for on street parking, the development 148 review team shall determine that the proposed on street parking will not materially 149 adversely impact traffic movements and related public street functions; and 150 (3) Credit for on street parking shall be limited to the number of spaces 151 provided along the street frontage adjacent to the use. 152 153 SECTION 4. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.W. That 154 Subsection 21A.24.010.W of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 155 Provisions: Compliance with Noise Regulations Required) shall be, and hereby is repealed in its 156 entirety as follows: 157 158 W. Compliance With Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential 159 zoning districts shall comply with section 9.28.040, "Noises Prohibited", of this Code. 160 161 SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.130.E.6. 162 That Subsection 21A.24.010.E.6 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RMF- 163 35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District: Minimum Yard Requirements: Existing 164 Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 165 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard 166 shall be no greater than the established setback line of the existing building unless the 167 proposed yard encroachment is to accommodate additional units. New principal 168 buildings must conform to current yard area requirements, unless the new principal 169 two-family dwelling or twin home has legal conforming status as outlined in 170 section 21A.38.070 of this title. 171 172 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.160.D. That 173 Subsection 21A.24.160.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RB 174 Residential/Business District: Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width) shall be, and hereby is LEGISLATIVE 6 175 amended only to eliminate the Land Use “A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail 176 or office uses” from the table in said subsection, with no other changes to the table: 177 178 179 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.180.I. That 180 Subsection 21A.24.180.I of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RO 181 Residential/Office District: Offices in Existing Buildings on Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand 182 Square Feet) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 183 I. Offices iIn Existing Buildings oOn Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand Square Feet: 184 Offices occupying existing buildings are permitted on a five thousand (5,000) square foot 185 minimum lot. Additions to existing buildings that are greater than fifty percent (50%) of 186 the existing building footprint or that exceed the height of the existing building shall be 187 subject to design review (chapter 21A.59 of this title) unless the existing building is using 188 the incentives in 21A.52.060. 189 190 SECTION 8. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.26.010.K. That 191 Subsection 21A.26.010.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Commercial Districts: General 192 Provisions: Bed and Breakfast Establishments and Reception Centers in Landmark Sites in the 193 CN Neighborhood Commercial and CB Community Business Districts) shall be, and hereby is 194 repealed in its entirety as follows: 195 196 K. Bed And Breakfast Establishments And Reception Centers In Landmark Sites In The CN 197 Neighborhood Commercial And CB Community Business Districts: 198 1. Conditional Use Required: Where not otherwise authorized by this title and after 199 conditional use approval by the Planning Commission pursuant to chapter 21A.54 of this Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail or office uses Included in principal use Included in principal use LEGISLATIVE 7 200 title, landmark sites in a CN or CB District may be used for a bed and breakfast 201 establishment or reception center subject to the following standards: 202 a. Standards: In addition to the standards for conditional uses, section 21A.54.080 of 203 this title, the Planning Commission shall find the following: 204 (1) The structure is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City Register of 205 Cultural Resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the City 206 accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 207 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the 208 designation and conditional use applications at the same time because of the risk 209 of probable demolition; 210 (2) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site; 211 (3) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood; and 212 (4) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 213 structure (if the structure is a residential structure), including mature landscaping. 214 b. Condition Of Approval: A preservation easement in favor of the City shall be placed 215 upon the landmark site. 216 217 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 218 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 219 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 220 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling, multi-family” and “Mixed use development” and to repeal 221 only the use category “Temporary use of closed schools and churches”, with no other changes to the 222 table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as follows: 8 223 Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 RB R-MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Adaptive reuse for additiona l uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P86 Dwelling , multi- family P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P P P P P P P P P Mixed use develop ment P1 P P P P Temporar y use of closed schools and churches C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 224 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 9 225 226 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That the 227 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 228 Districts of Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 229 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 230 notes “1”, “6”, “8” and “19” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as 231 follows: 232 1. Reserved. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 233 234 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 235 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the 236 building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review 237 unless the building qualifies for the incentives in 21A.52.060. 238 239 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSubsection 21A.52.060.A 21A.24.010S 240 of this title. 241 242 19. Reserved. Subject to section 21A.36.170 of this title. 243 244 245 246 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 247 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 248 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be amended only as to the use category “Bed and 249 breakfast” and to repeal only the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House 250 museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception centers in landmark sites”, with no other 251 changes to the table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as 252 follows: 253 254 255 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse LEGISLATIVE 10 CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P Bed and breakfast manor C3 C3 P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C 257 258 259 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 260 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial 261 Districts of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 262 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 263 note “3” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 264 3. Reserved. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City register of cultural 265 resources (see subsections 21A.26.010S and 21A.26.010K of this title). 266 267 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 268 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 269 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) is amended only to repeal the use categories 270 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception 271 centers in landmark sites”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area 272 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: LEGISLATIVE 11 273 Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Use Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 2 1A.24.010S of this title) P P P P P P P P Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010. S of this title) P P P P P P P P 274 275 276 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That Section 277 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 278 Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 279 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for 280 Manufacturing Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse M-1 M-2 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7 281 LEGISLATIVE 12 282 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That the 283 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing 284 Districts of Section 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 285 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as 286 to note “7” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 287 7. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 288 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent 289 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 290 review. 291 292 SECTION 16. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 293 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 294 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 295 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 296 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 298 299 SECTION 17. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 300 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 301 Districts of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 302 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 303 note “4” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 304 4. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 305 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent LEGISLATIVE 13 306 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 307 review (chapter 21A.59 of this title). 308 309 SECTION 18. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 310 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 311 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 312 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway 313 District, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Use G-MU Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P 314 315 SECTION 19. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 316 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 317 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be amended only for the use categories 318 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site” and “Dwelling: Multi-family”, in the Table of Permitted and 319 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 14 320 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG- 2 AG- 5 AG- 20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C2 C2 C2 C2 P2 P2 Dwelling: Multi- family P2 P2 P2 P P 321 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 15 322 323 SECTION 20. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That the 324 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose 325 Districts of Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 326 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only 327 as to note “2” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 328 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. When located 329 in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 330 331 SECTION 21. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That Section 332 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 333 Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 334 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling: Multi-family”, and “Reception center” and to repeal only the 335 use categories “House museum in a landmark”, and “Office and/or reception center in a landmark 336 site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts, with no other changes 337 to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible of a landmark buildings C9 P Dwelling: Multi-family P9 P P P P House museum in landmark site P P P P P Office and/or Reception center in a landmark site P P P P Reception center P P P P 338 339 LEGISLATIVE 16 340 SECTION 22. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That the 341 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based 342 Districts of Section 21A.33.870 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 343 Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended to add an additional note 344 “9”, which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 345 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 346 347 SECTION 23. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.170. That Section 348 21A.36.170 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Reuse of Church and School 349 Buildings) is hereby repealed in its entirety as follows: 350 21A.36.170: RESERVEDUSE OF CHURCH AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS: 351 A. Change Of Use: In the PL, PL-2, I, UI or any residential district, a change of use of 352 any church or school to a use that is allowed as a permitted use or conditional use in the zoning 353 district may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this 354 title. 355 B. Temporary Use Of Closed Schools And Churches; Authorized As Conditional Use: The 356 temporary use of closed schools and churches may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to 357 the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this title, in the zoning districts indicated in the land use 358 tables of this title, provided that: 359 1. Use: The temporary use is for office space or educational purposes for public or private 360 charities. 361 2. Application: The application for a temporary use of a closed school or church shall 362 include, in addition to the application submission requirements of chapter 21A.54 of this title, the 363 following information: 364 a. Building Plans: As part of the application, the applicant shall provide a site plan drawn 365 to scale showing existing structures, auxiliary buildings, existing 366 parking and landscaping, and any proposed changes to the site. In converting the existing facility 367 to the proposed conditional use, no major exterior or interior alterations of the building shall be 368 made which render the building incompatible with a return to its use as a school or church; and 369 b. Use Plan: A proposed use plan including: LEGISLATIVE 17 370 (1) Hours and days of operation, 371 (2) Evidence of noise, odor or vibration emissions, 372 (3) Evidence of the number of classes, including hours taught, days taught, and the 373 expected class size, 374 (4) Average number of clients per day and the frequency of turnover of the clients, and 375 (5) Number of employees, staff or volunteers, both total and expected to be on the 376 premises at any given time. 377 3. Prohibition: No provision of this section shall be construed to allow any use in a 378 closed school or church for retail, residential or industrial purposes, or any use involving any 379 type of correctional or institutional facility. 380 4. Ownership: The School Board or church shall remain the owner of the property during 381 the period of time for which the conditional use is granted and any change of ownership away 382 from the School Board or church shall immediately cause the conditional use to terminate. 383 5. Automatic Termination Of Use: If the School Board or church group determines that no 384 future public or religious use will be made of the building as a public school or church, the 385 conditional use as granted under this section shall immediately cease and the property shall 386 thereafter be used only for uses permitted in the zoning district. 387 6. Temporary Use: The conditional use provided by this section shall be temporary only. 388 The time of such use shall be subject to the decision of the Planning Commission based on its 389 consideration of the criteria specified in subsection B7 of this section. The Planning Commission 390 may authorize the conditional use for a period not to exceed five (5) years, which may be 391 renewed for additional periods not in excess of five (5) years. 392 7. Termination For Excess Use: If the Planning Commission determines that the conditional 393 use is being used substantially in excess of the plan for use submitted pursuant to subsection B2b 394 of this section, the Planning Commission may, after an informal hearing, revoke the conditional 395 use if it determines that the excess use is having a negative impact on the neighborhood. 396 397 SECTION 24. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.1 That Subsection 398 21A.44.060.A.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 399 Parking Location and Design: Generally: Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building 400 Served), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 401 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required 402 to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this 403 ordinance shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the building or use served, LEGISLATIVE 18 404 unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, "Off-Site Parking 405 Permitted", or 21A.55.020, “Planned Developments – Authority”. 406 407 SECTION 25. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.020. That 408 Section 21A.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Applicability) shall 409 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 410 411 21A.52.020 APPLICABILITY: 412 A. This chapter applies as indicated within each subsection. 413 B. The planned development process in Chapter 21A.55 is not required as indicated within 414 this chapter. 415 C. The administrative planned development process in Chapter 21A.55, and the 416 administrative design review process in Chapter 21A.59 may be applicable as indicated 417 within this chapter. 418 419 SECTION 26. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.030. That 420 Section 21A.52.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Relationship to Base 421 Zoning District and Overlay Zoning Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as 422 follows: 423 424 21A.52.030: RELATIONSHIP TO BASE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OVERLAY 425 ZONING DISTRICTS: 426 Unless otherwise indicated in this chapter, all base zoning district or overlay zoning district 427 standards and requirements take precedence except as indicated in this section. 428 429 SECTION 27. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.040. That 430 Section 21A.52.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Approval Process) 431 shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 432 433 21A.52.040: APPROVAL PROCESS: LEGISLATIVE 19 434 Unless specifically exempted or modified by this chapter, all requirements of this title shall 435 apply. 436 A. Zoning Incentives: Applicants using the zoning incentives in this chapter shall submit a 437 zoning incentives application and provide the following information: 438 1. The applicant's name, address, telephone number and interest in the property to which 439 the incentives shall apply; 440 2. The owner's name, address and telephone number, if different than the applicant, and 441 the owner's signed consent to the filing of the application; 442 3. The street address, tax parcel number and legal description of the subject property; 443 4. The zoning classification, zoning district boundaries and present use of the subject 444 property; 445 5. The location of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, accessory and 446 principal, showing the number of stories and height, dwelling type, if applicable, 447 major elevations and the total square footage of the floor area by proposed use and 448 any additional information required for site plan review set forth in Chapter 21A.58; 449 6. The total number of dwelling units in the project, the number of affordable units, the 450 number of bedrooms in the affordable units, the location of the affordable units, and 451 level of affordability; and 452 7. Any additional information required by Chapter 21A.59 design review or 21A.55 453 planned development, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this 454 chapter, as applicable; and 455 8. Any additional information the zoning administrator deems necessary to demonstrate 456 compliance with this chapter. 457 B. Preliminary approval shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications 458 for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, 459 a building permit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no permits shall be issued until final 460 approval is obtained pursuant to this Chapter. Preliminary approval shall be valid for a 461 period of one year unless complete building plans have been submitted to the Division of 462 Building Services. 463 C. Administrative design review and administrative planned development, where applicable, 464 shall be exempt from the application fees and noticing fees otherwise required pursuant 465 to Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55. 466 D. Following the approval of any administrative design review or planned development 467 application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the 468 approved design review application unless a modification is approved subject to the 469 process outlined in Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55, as applicable. 470 E. Final approval shall occur following the recording of the restrictive covenant. 471 F. Preliminary and final approvals shall be administrative approvals by the planning director 472 or the planning director's designee. 473 474 SECTION 28. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.A. That 475 Subsection 21A.52.050.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable 476 Housing Incentives: Purpose) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 20 477 478 21A.52.050 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES: 479 A. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section chapter are intended to encourage the 480 development of affordable housing. The provisions within this section are intended to 481 facilitate the construction of affordable housing by allowing more inclusive development 482 than would otherwise be permitted in the base zoning districts. Housing constructed using 483 the incentives is intended to be compatible in form with the neighborhood and provide for 484 safe and comfortable places to live and play. 485 486 SECTION 29. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3. 487 That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: 488 Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 489 490 3. Incentives in the CB Community Business, CC Corridor Commercial, CG General 491 Commercial, and I Institutional Zoning Districts: 492 a. The following housing types: row houses, sideways row houses, and cottage 493 developments are authorized provided the affordability requirements in 494 subsection b. are complied with;. 495 b. The minimum open space requirements in the I Institutional zoning district do 496 not apply. 497 c. To be eligible for the incentives listed in this subsection 3a., a development shall 498 meet the affordability requirements for Type C in Table 21A.52.050.G. 499 500 SECTION 30. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.52. That Chapter 501 21A.52 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended 502 to add a new Section 21A.52.060, with no other revisions to the chapter, to read as follows: 503 21A.52.060: BUILDING PRESERVATION INCENTIVES: 504 The provisions in this section provide optional incentives to development projects that include 505 the preservation of an existing building. The incentives located in Subsection 21A.52.060.A may 506 be combined with the incentives outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 507 A. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings: 508 509 1. Purpose: To allow additional land uses in buildings that generally contribute to the 510 character of the city so they can be redeveloped for economically viable uses. These LEGISLATIVE 21 511 buildings may be underutilized or have outlived their original use due to economic 512 conditions, size of the building, a substantial degree of deterioration of the property, 513 or other factors. Eligible buildings may hold historical or cultural significance or 514 contribute to the existing neighborhood fabric through their architectural features, 515 size, or previous use. 516 517 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to adaptive reuse of a building 518 that meets the eligibility standards in 21A.52.060.A.3. 519 520 3. Eligibility Standards: 521 a. The following buildings are eligible for the incentives in this subsection: 522 (1) Landmark Sites; 523 (2) Buildings individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places; 524 (3) Buildings designed and formerly used for schools, hospitals, places of 525 worship, or other similar institutional uses; and 526 (4) Buildings that the planning director has deemed significant based on the 527 structure’s association with events that have contributed to broad patterns of 528 history, association with lives of persons important in the city’s past, or 529 displays distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of 530 construction. 531 b. Exterior features that are important in defining the overall character of the 532 building shall be retained. 533 c. Exterior alterations to the eligible building shall meet the standards in 534 21A.34.020.G. 535 d. The proposed use is conducive to the preservation of the building. 536 e. A change of use to a residential use is not permitted in the OS (Open Space) 537 zoning district. 538 f.If the eligible building is located in a residential zoning district, and the existing 539 use is residential, a change of use to nonresidential is not permitted. 540 g. Properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay must obtain a Certificate 541 of Appropriateness in accordance with 21A.34.020. 542 4. Incentives: 543 a. Additional Uses: Unless prohibited by Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.a(1), any use 544 may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use in zoning districts where 545 Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings is listed in the land use 546 tables in Chapter 21A.33, subject to the provisions in this subsection and any 547 specific provisions applicable to the use in this title. Any conditional use shall be 548 reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards outlined in Chapter 21A.54. 549 (1) Prohibited Uses: A change of use to one of the following uses is prohibited: 550 Ambulance services (indoor and outdoor), amusement park, auditorium, bio- 551 medical facility, bus line station/terminal, bus line yard and repair facility, car 552 wash, check cashing/payday loan business, community correctional facility 553 (large and small), contractor’s yard/office, drive-through facility associated 554 with any use, equipment rental (indoor and outdoor), gas station, heliport, 555 hotel/motel, impound lot, intermodal transit passenger hub, jail, large wind 556 energy system, laundry and dry cleaning establishments, limousine service LEGISLATIVE 22 557 (large and small), heavy manufacturing, pet cemetery, recycling collection 558 station, sexually oriented business, sign painting/fabrication, storage 559 (outdoor), public storage (outdoor), wireless telecommunications facility, 560 homeless resource centers, and any other uses that are only allowed in the 561 manufacturing districts. 562 b. Parking and Loading: The following are the minimum off-street parking and 563 loading requirements for the eligible building. These minimums may be further 564 reduced with the alternatives to minimum parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 565 (1) Multi-Family: 0.5 off-street parking space per dwelling unit is required; 566 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 567 for the proposed use listed in the general context of the required off-street 568 parking table in 21A.44 may be reduced by 40%; 569 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 570 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 571 no additional parking shall be required; 572 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 573 c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements 574 of the zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In 575 the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 576 apply. 577 578 5. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 579 21A.52.060.A shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 580 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 581 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 582 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 583 with the land for the duration of the adaptive reuse and shall provide for the 584 following, without limitation: 585 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 586 conditions thereof; 587 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 588 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 589 important to the character of the building shall be preserved for the duration of the 590 adaptive reuse or if subject to 21A.34.020, indefinitely unless otherwise permitted 591 by the terms of a certificate of appropriateness; 592 c. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the potential 593 enforcement actions for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 594 595 6. Modifications to Approved Adaptive Reuse: Any modification to the use approved 596 under these incentives requires a new zoning incentives application. Any new 597 adaptive reuse shall also require a new zoning incentives application unless the new 598 use is permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the zoning district. 599 600 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection A, or the restrictive covenant on the 601 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.A.5, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 602 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for LEGISLATIVE 23 603 violations as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 604 21A.52.060.A.5, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 605 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 606 607 B. Preservation of a Principal Building: 608 609 1. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section are intended to encourage the 610 preservation of buildings, supporting city goals related to sustainability, 611 neighborhoods, economy, and housing. The provisions are designed to support 612 developments that include preserving an eligible building by allowing flexibility with 613 certain zoning regulations while still maintaining the unique urban fabric and 614 character of neighborhoods. 615 616 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to projects in all zoning districts 617 that preserve an existing principal building that meets the eligibility standards in 618 21A.52.060.B.3. These incentives may be applied to existing principal buildings and 619 new construction within the same development area. For the purposes of this 620 subsection, the development area may include multiple abutting lots or parcels. 621 622 3. Eligibility Standards: 623 a. Building Age: The existing building to be preserved was built prior to 1976. 624 b. Minimum Footprint of Eligible Building: The footprint of the eligible building to 625 be preserved covers a minimum of 25% of the development area. A lower 626 percentage may be considered by the planning director if the building has frontage 627 on a public street, contains a publicly accessible use such as retail, restaurant, or 628 entertainment, or would be highly visible from public spaces within the interior of 629 the site. 630 c. Retention of All Existing Principal Structures: In the FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R - 631 1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000, R-2, SR-1, SR-1A, SR-3, and all RMF zoning 632 districts, all existing principal structures included in the overall development area 633 shall be retained. 634 d. Modifications to Existing Building: A maximum of 25% of each street facing 635 building wall may be removed to accommodate modifications or additions. No 636 more than 50% of the building’s exterior walls may be removed. Portions of a 637 building wall with character defining architectural features shall not be removed. 638 e. Retention of Existing Active Commercial Uses: Eligible buildings with existing 639 active commercial uses with ground level street frontage are subject to the 640 following requirements. For the purpose of this subsection, active commercial 641 uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent 642 to a building and encourage pedestrian activity and walk-in traffic. Active uses 643 may include retail goods/service establishments, restaurants, bars, art and craft 644 studios, or other uses determined to be substantially similar in terms of activation 645 by the planning director. 646 (1) A minimum of 50% of the length shall be retained along the street frontage in 647 the existing building or be included as part of the new development. If 648 included in the new development, the active commercial use shall have the LEGISLATIVE 24 649 primary entrance on the street frontage with direct public access from the 650 street frontage. 651 (2) The existing depth of the active commercial use shall be maintained or a 652 minimum depth of 25 feet, whichever is less. 653 (3) These requirements do not apply to nonconforming active commercial uses 654 with ground level street frontage. 655 656 4. Incentives: 657 a. Planned Development Waived: A planned development is not required for the 658 following: 659 (1) More Than One Principal Building Per Lot: More than one principal building 660 per lot is allowed without having frontage along a public street. 661 (2) Lots without Frontage on a Public Street: Lots do not require frontage on a 662 public street if necessary cross access easements are provided. 663 b. Administrative Planned Development: The following are authorized through an 664 administrative planned development pursuant to the procedures and standards in 665 Chapter 21A.55. The minimum planned development size required by 666 21A.55.060 does not apply: 667 (1) Modification to the minimum yard requirements. 668 (2) Modification to the open space and landscaping requirements when the 669 modification specifically relates to preserving the existing building(s). 670 (3) Modifications to the provisions for awnings and canopies, balconies, patios, 671 and porches in Table 21A.36.020.B, Obstructions in Required Yards. 672 (4) Modifications to the parking location and setback requirements in Table 673 21A.44.060.A. 674 (5) Parking within the boundary of a planned development area but located on a 675 different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is allowed and is 676 not considered off-site parking. The parking must only serve the uses within 677 the planned development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions 678 of this title. 679 c.Minimum Lot Area, Width & Coverage: 680 (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 681 width tables of the zoning district does not apply. 682 (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 683 width tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning 684 districts: FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. 685 (3) RMF-30 zoning district: The minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 686 apply. 687 (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the 688 individual lot or parcel within the development area. 689 d.Height: Additional building height is authorized in zoning districts as indicated in 690 the following sections through administrative design review. The maximum 691 height per story of the additional building height incentive shall not exceed 12 692 feet. Administrative design review shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures 693 and standards in Chapter 21A.59. The additional height authorized by this LEGISLATIVE 25 694 subsection shall not be combined with the additional height authorized by 695 Subsection 21A.52.050, Affordable Housing Incentives. 696 697 (1) Residential districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive RMU-35 45’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RMU-45 55’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RMU 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RO 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 698 699 (2) Commercial Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive CB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CN May build one additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CC 45’ CG 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building for properties in the boundary described in 21A.26.070.G. CSHBD1 105’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CSHBD2 60’ and 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Transition 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Core 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 700 LEGISLATIVE 26 701 (3) Form-based districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 90’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-MU11 125’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN2 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SC 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SE 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN1 3 stories and 30’ in height. 702 703 (4) Downtown districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive D-2 120’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. D-3 180’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 704 705 (5) Other districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive GMU 180’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. MU 60’ provided that the additional height is for residential uses only. I Building heights in excess of 35' but not more than 75' provided, that for each foot of height over 35', each required yard shall be increased 1'. UI Building heights in excess of 75' but not more 120' provided that the additional height is supported by the master plan and compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. OS – Lots greater than 4 acres Building heights in excess of 45’ up to 60’ provided that for each foot of height over 45’, each required yard and landscaped yard shall be increased by 1’. 706 LEGISLATIVE 27 707 708 e. Administrative design review is permitted for the following: 709 (1) Buildings in the CSHBD1 or CSHBD2 zoning district that exceed 20,000 710 square feet in size. 711 (2) Buildings in the CB zoning district that exceed 7,500 gross square feet of floor 712 area for a first-floor footprint or in excess of 15,000 gross square feet floor 713 area. 714 f. Parking: The following are the minimum off-street parking requirements unless a 715 lesser requirement is listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44. 716 These minimums may be further reduced with the alternatives to minimum 717 parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 718 (1) Residential: 0.5 space per dwelling unit for multi-family; 1 space per dwelling 719 unit for all other residential uses. 720 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 721 for the proposed use listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44 722 may be reduced by 40%. 723 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 724 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 725 no additional parking shall be required. 726 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 727 728 g. Minimum Required Yards: The minimum required yards may apply to the 729 perimeter of the development area and not to the individual lot or parcel within 730 the development area. 731 732 5. Design Standards for New Construction: Unless a stricter design standard related to 733 each of the following is included in the base zone or Chapter 21A.37, the following 734 design standards are required for all zones except single and two-family zoning 735 districts: 736 a. Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, 50% of any street facing 737 facade shall be clad in durable materials. Durable materials include stone, brick, 738 masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that 739 includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, 740 weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials 741 may be used for the remainder of the facade facing the street. Other materials 742 proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of 743 the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is 744 appropriate for the proposed location on the building. 745 b. Ground Floor Glass: The surface area of the ground floor of a street facing façade 746 shall contain a minimum percentage of glass as indicated below, calculated 747 between 3 feet and 8 feet above grade. All ground floor glass shall allow 748 unhampered and unobstructed visibility into the building for a depth of at least 5 749 feet, excluding any glass etching and window signs when installed and permitted 750 in accordance with Chapter 21A.46, "Signs", of this title. 751 (1) Nonresidential Uses: 50% ground floor glass 752 (2) Residential Uses: If the ground level of the building is occupied by residential 753 uses that face the street, the minimum glass requirement is 20%. LEGISLATIVE 28 754 c. Upper Floor Glass: The surface area of the façade of each street facing floor 755 above the ground floor must contain a minimum of 20% glass. 756 d. Maximum Length of a Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall 757 uninterrupted by windows or doors at the ground floor level along any street 758 facing façade is 15 feet. Emergency exit doors and doors to access structured 759 parking or utility equipment shall not count as an interruption. 760 e. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: 761 (1) The maximum length of each street facing building facade shall not exceed 762 100 feet in the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 districts. 763 (2) The maximum length of each street facing building façade shall not 764 exceed 175 feet in all other zoning districts. 765 f.Building Entrances: A building entrance that provides direct access to the use 766 with a walkway connected to the public sidewalk is required for each ground floor 767 street facing façade as follows: 768 (1) Single Family Attached: All units abutting a street shall have the primary 769 entrance on the street. 770 (2) Multi-family: At least one building entrance is required for each street facing 771 façade. Additional building entrances shall be required every 75 feet. 772 (3) Unless the base zone of the property has specific entry feature requirements, 773 all required residential building entries shall have an unenclosed entry porch, 774 portico, awning or canopy, or emphasized doorway entry feature as described 775 in 21A.37.050.P. The entry feature may encroach in the front yard setback, 776 but the encroachment shall not be closer than 5 feet from the front property 777 line. 778 (4) Nonresidential Uses: At least one building entrance is required for each street 779 facing façade. Additional building entrances shall be required every 40 feet. 780 g. Garage Doors Facing Street: Garage doors are prohibited on the façade of the 781 building that is parallel to, or located along, a public street. 782 h. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment shall be screened 783 from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of 784 siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural 785 design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location 786 restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020B, “Obstructions In 787 Required Yards”. 788 789 6. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 790 21A.52.060.B shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 791 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 792 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 793 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 794 with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: 795 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 796 conditions thereof; 797 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 798 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 799 important to the character of the building shall be preserved during the term; 800 c. Projects that apply the incentives to new buildings on the development site shall 801 guarantee retention of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives for a LEGISLATIVE 29 802 minimum term of 30 years or, if the eligible building is subject to 21A.34.020, 803 indefinitely unless otherwise permitted by the terms of a certificate of 804 appropriateness after such 30 year period; 805 d. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the city’s potential 806 remedies for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 807 808 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection B, or the restrictive covenant on the 809 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.B.6, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 810 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for violations 811 as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 812 21A.52.060.B.6, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 813 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.B. Financial remedies for a 814 violation of the covenant may include liquidated damages representing a reasonable 815 estimate of the value of the incentives, plus other associated damages valued up to 816 20% of the tax assessed value of the preserved building over the three preceding 817 years. 818 819 820 SECTION 31. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.020. That 821 Section 21A.55.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Authority) shall 822 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 823 824 21A.55.020: AUTHORITY: 825 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with 826 modifications, deny, or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific 827 zoning standards outlined in 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying 828 provisions in 21A.52.060.B in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in 829 this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 830 located. 831 832 B. Planning Commission Review: The Pplanning Ccommission may approve planned 833 developments for uses listed in the tables of permitted and conditional uses for each 834 category of zoning district or districts. The approval shall be in accordance with the 835 standards and procedures set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the 836 district in which the property is located. 837 In approving a planned development, the Pplanning Ccommission may change, alter, 838 modify or waive the following provisions of this title: 839 1A. Zoning Aand Subdivision Regulations: Any provisions of this title or of the Ccity's 840 subdivision regulations as they apply to the proposed planned development except 841 that the Pplanning Ccommission cannot approve a use that is not allowed in the 842 zoning district in which the planned development is located, with the exception of 843 off-site parking as further described in this section. LEGISLATIVE 30 844 2B. Off-Site Parking: Off-site pParking within the boundary of a planned development 845 area, but located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is 846 in zoning districts where off-site parking is not an allowed and not considered off- 847 site parking use. The parking must only serve the uses be located within the planned 848 development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions of this title. 849 3C.Building Height: Up to five feet (5') of additional building height, except in the FR, 850 R-1, SR, or R-2 Zzoning Ddistricts where additional building height cannot be 851 approved through the planned development process. 852 4D.Density: Residential planned developments shall not exceed the density limitation 853 of the zoning district where the planned development is proposed except as allowed 854 below. The calculation of planned development density may include open space that 855 is provided as an amenity to the planned development. Public streets located within 856 or adjacent to a planned development shall not be included in the planned 857 development area for the purpose of calculating density. 858 a1. In the RMF Zzoning Ddistricts and on lots 0.20 acres or more in size, 859 developments that change a nonconforming commercial use to a residential use 860 that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density limitations of 861 the zoning district when approved as a planned development. 862 863 SECTION 32. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.030. That 864 Section 21A.55.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Planning 865 Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 866 867 21A.55.030: PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 868 869 A. No Presumption Oof Approval: A request for a planned development does not constitute 870 an assurance or presumption that such planned development will be approved. Rather, 871 each proposed planned development shall be evaluated on an individual basis, in relation 872 to its compliance with the standards and factors set forth in this chapter and with the 873 standards for the zoning district in which it is located, in order to determine whether the 874 planned development is appropriate at a particular location. 875 876 B. Approval: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 877 planned developments, may approve a planned development as proposed or may impose 878 conditions necessary or appropriate for the planned development to comply with the 879 standards and factors set forth in this chapter. 880 881 C. Denial: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 882 planned developments, may deny an application for a planned development if it finds that 883 the proposal does not meet the intent of the base zoning district, does not meet the LEGISLATIVE 31 884 purpose of this chapter, or is not consistent with the standards and factors as set forth in 885 this chapter. 886 887 888 SECTION 33. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.040. That 889 Section 21A.55.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Procedures) 890 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 891 892 21A.55.040: PROCEDURES: 893 894 A. Application: An application for a planned development shall be made on an application 895 form prepared by the zoning administrator and accompanied by applicable fees as noted 896 in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible 897 for payment of all mailing fees established for required public noticing. The applicant 898 must file an application for planned development approval with the Planning Director. A 899 complete application shall contain at least the following information submitted by the 900 applicant, unless certain information is determined by the zoning administrator Planning 901 Director to be inapplicable or unnecessary to appropriately evaluate the application. The 902 application submittal shall include one paper copy and one digital copy: 903 904 1. A complete description of the proposed planned development including the zoning 905 regulations being modified in the planned development and the planning objectives 906 being met; 907 2. When the proposed planned development includes provisions for common open space 908 or recreational facilities, a statement describing the provision to be made for the care 909 and maintenance of such open space or recreational facilities; 910 3. A written statement with supporting graphics showing how the proposed planned 911 development is compatible with other property in the neighborhood; 912 4. Plans, as required pursuant to sSection 21A.58.060 of this title, with the exception of 913 the number of copies required; 914 5. Architectural graphics including floor plans, elevations, profiles and cross sections; 915 6. A preliminary subdivision plat, if required; 916 7. Traffic impact analysis, where required by the City Transportation Division; and 917 8. Other information or documentation the zoning administratorPlanning Director may 918 deem necessary for proper review and analysis of a particular application. 919 920 B. Determination Oof Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a planned 921 development, the zoning administratorPlanning Director shall make a determination of 922 completeness of the application pursuant to sSection 21A.10.010 of this title. 923 924 C. Public Notification and Engagement: 925 LEGISLATIVE 32 926 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an 927 application that qualifies for administrative review, the planning director shall 928 provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10.020.B. 929 930 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: 931 a. Applications subject to planning commission review are subject to the notification 932 requirements of Chapter 2.60. 933 b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements 934 found in Chapter 21A.10. 935 936 Staff Report: Upon completing a site plan review and receiving recommendations from 937 applicable City department(s)/division(s), a staff report evaluating the planned development 938 application shall be prepared by the Planning Division and forwarded to the applicant and the 939 Planning Commission. 940 941 D. Public Hearing: The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review the 942 planned development application in accordance with the standards and procedures set 943 forth in chapter 21A.10 of this title. 944 945 E. Planning Commission Action: Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission 946 shall decide, on the basis of the standards contained in section 21A.55.050 of this chapter 947 whether to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the application. 948 949 F. Notification Of Decision: The Planning Director shall notify the applicant of the decision 950 of the Planning Commission in writing, accompanied by one copy of the submitted plans 951 marked to show such decision and a copy of the motion approving, approving with 952 modifications, or denying the development plan application. 953 954 955 SECTION 34. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.050. That 956 Section 21A.55.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Standards for 957 Planned Developments) shall be, and hereby is amended, as to the preamble only with 958 Subsections A through G unchanged: 959 960 21A.55.050: STANDARDS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: 961 962 The Pplanning Ccommission, or the planning director in the case of an administrative planned 963 development, may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a planned development based upon 964 written findings of fact according to each of the following standards. It is the responsibility of the 965 applicant to provide written and graphic evidence demonstrating compliance with the following 966 standards: 967 LEGISLATIVE 33 968 969 SECTION 35. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.070. That 970 Section 21A.55.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Appeal of the 971 Planning Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 972 973 21A.55.070: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 974 Any person adversely affected by a final decision of the Pplanning Ccommission or planning 975 director in the case of administrative planned developments, on an application for a planned 976 development may appeal to the Aappeals Hhearing Oofficer in accordance with the provisions 977 of cChapter 21A.16 of this title. The filing of the appeal shall not stay the pending the outcome 978 of the appeal, except as provided for under sSection 21A.16.030F of this title. 979 980 SECTION 36. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.080. That 981 Section 21A.55.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Time Limit on 982 Approved Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 983 984 21A.55.080: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 985 No planned development approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless a 986 building permit has been issued or complete building plans have been submitted to the Division 987 of Building Services and Licensing. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case 988 of an administrative planned development, may grant an extension of a planned development for 989 up to one additional year when the applicant is able to demonstrate no change in circumstance 990 that would result in an unmitigated impact. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the 991 expiration of the planned development approval. 992 993 SECTION 37. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.090. That 994 Section 21A.55.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Effect of 995 Approval of Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 996 997 21A.55.090: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: LEGISLATIVE 34 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 The approval of a proposed planned development by the Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall not authorize the establishment or extension of any use nor the development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of any building or structure, but shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications for any permits or approvals that may be required by the regulations of the Ccity, including, but not limited to, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy and subdivision approval. SECTION 38. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.100. That 1007 Section 21A.55.100 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Modifications 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 to Development Plan) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 21A.55.100: MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Following planned development approval, the development plan approved by the Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall constitute the site design in relation to building placement and design, landscaping, mobility and circulation elements, and any elements that were approved as zoning modifications through the planned development process. Modifications to the development plan may be allowed pursuant to this section. A. New Application Required Ffor Modifications Aand Amendments: No substantial Mmodifications or amendments shall be made in the construction, development or use without a new application under subject to the provisions of this section.title. Minor modifications or amendments may be made subject to written approval of the Planning Director and the date for completion may be extended by the Planning Commission upon recommendation of the Planning Director. B. Minor Modifications: The Pplanning Ddirector may authorize minor modifications to the approved development plan pursuant to the provisions for modifications to an approved site plan as set forth in chapter 21A.58 of this title when such modifications appear necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations necessary to comply with an adopted building, fire, or engineering code or standard or when the modification complies with the applicable standards in the underlying zoning district or overlay district. Such minor modifications shall be limited to the following elements: 1. Adjusting the distance as shown on the approved development plan between any one structure or group of structures, and any other structure or group of structures, or any vehicular circulation element or any boundary of the site; 2. Adjusting the location of any open space; LEGISLATIVE 35 1034 3. Adjusting any final grade; 1035 4. Altering the types of landscaping elements and their arrangement within the 1036 required landscaping buffer area; 1037 5. Signs; 1038 6. Relocation or construction of accessory structures that comply with the provisions 1039 of 21A.40 and any applicable accessory structure regulations; or 1040 7. Additions which comply with the lot and bulk requirements of the underlying 1041 zone. 1042 Such minor modifications shall be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title and 1043 the development plan as approved pursuant to this chapter and shall be the minimum 1044 necessary to overcome the particular difficulty comply with the standards of the 1045 underlying zoning district or the applicable building, fire, or engineering code or standard 1046 and shall not be approved if such modifications would result in a violation of any 1047 standard or requirement of this title. A minor modification shall not be approved if the 1048 modification reduces a required building setback, authorizes an increase in lot coverage, 1049 or increases building height. 1050 C. Major Modifications: Any modifications to the approved development plan not 1051 authorized by sSubsection B of this section shall be considered to be a major 1052 modification. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an 1053 administrative planned development, shall give notice to all property owners consistent 1054 with notification requirements located in chapter 21A.10 of this title. The Pplanning 1055 Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, 1056 may approve an application for a major modification to the approved development plan, 1057 not requiring a modification of written conditions of approval or recorded easements, 1058 upon finding that any changes in the plan as approved will be in substantial conformity 1059 with the approved development plan. If the commission or planning director in the case 1060 of an administrative planned development, determines that a major modification is not in 1061 substantial conformity with the approved development plan, then the commission or 1062 planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall review the 1063 request in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. 1064 D. Other Modifications: Any modification to the planned development that complies with 1065 the standards of the underlying zoning district or overlay zoning district is allowed 1066 provided the modification does not violate a condition of approval or other requirement 1067 placed on the planned development as part of the approval of the application and required 1068 permits and approvals are obtained. 1069 LEGISLATIVE 36 1070 SECTION 39. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.59.020.A. That 1071 Subsection 21A.59.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Review: Authority: 1072 Administrative Review) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1073 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, 1074 deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when 1075 proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing 1076 structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, 1077 Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized in the specific zoning district 1078 elsewhere in this title. 1079 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director 1080 finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, 1081 the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, 1082 the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other 1083 buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, 1084 and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives 1085 (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 1086 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions 1087 or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is 1088 necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of 1089 the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with 1090 the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face 1091 on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review 1092 objectives. 1093 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does 1094 not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the 1095 applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no 1096 modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the 1097 design comply. 1098 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning 1099 commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than 1100 allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification 1101 can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the 1102 request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided 1103 in this section. 1104 LEGISLATIVE 37 1105 SECTION 40. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That 1106 Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall 1107 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1108 a. Amending the definition of “ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A LANDMARK 1109 BUILDING.” That the definition shall be amended to read as follows: 1110 ADAPTIVE REUSE FOR ADDITTIONAL USES IN ELIGIBLE OF A LANDMARK 1111 BUILDINGS: The process of reusing a building for a purpose other than which it was built or 1112 designed for landmark buildings original use is no longer feasible. Other land uses, in addition to 1113 those specifically listed in the land use tables, may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use 1114 subject to the provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 1115 1116 b. Amending the definition of “PARKING, OFF SITE.” That the definition of 1117 “PARKING, OFF SITE” shall be amended to read as follows: 1118 PARKING, OFF SITE: An off-street parking area intended to serve one or more uses and that is 1119 located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve. Parking approved within 1120 the boundary of a planned development that only serves uses within the planned development 1121 area is not considered off-site parking. 1122 c. Repealing the definition “HOUSE MUSEUM IN A LANDMARK SITE” as 1123 follows: 1124 HOUSE MUSEUM IN LANDMARK SITE: A dwelling unit which is converted from its original 1125 principal use as a dwelling unit to a staffed institution dedicated to educational, aesthetic or 1126 historic purposes. Such museum should include a staff who commands an appropriate body of 1127 special knowledge necessary to convey the historical, aesthetic or architectural attributes of the 1128 building and its collections to the general public. Such staff should also have the ability to reach 1129 museological decisions consonant with the experience of his or her peers and have access to and 1130 acquaintance with the literature of the field. Such museum should maintain either regular hours 1131 or be available for appointed visits such that access is reasonably convenient to the public. 1132 1133 SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 1134 first publication. LEGISLATIVE 38 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 2024. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , CHAIRPERSON 1140 1141 1142 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Adaptive Reuse Preservation Incentives_Opt2(legislative)v1 2.ORDINANCE (VERSION 1) LEGISLATIVE 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. of 2024 3 4 (Amending the zoning text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings) 6 7 An ordinance amending the text of various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City 8 Code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and preservation of buildings pursuant to 9 Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155. 10 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning 11 Commission”) held a public hearing on a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor, Erin 12 Mendenhall to amend the zoning code pertaining to zoning incentives for adaptive reuse and 13 preservation of buildings (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00155); and 14 WHEREAS, at its February 28, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 15 of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on said petition; 16 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19 20 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.015.A. That 21 Subsection 21A.10.015.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 22 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Engagement: Land Use Projects Subject to 23 Public Engagement) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 24 A. Land Use Projects Subject to Public Engagement: The following are considered land use 25 projects for purposes of this chapter and are subject to the public engagement process and 26 requirements herein: 27 28 1. Request for an alley/street closure or vacation; 29 2. Amendments to Title 21A; 30 3. Conditional use applications; LEGISLATIVE 2 31 4. Design review applications, that are subject to review by the planning commission as 32 provided in Chapter 21A.59; 33 5. Applications to demolish one or more landmark sites or contributing structures 34 located within a local historic district; 35 6. Master plans, including amendments, to be adopted by the city council; 36 7. Requests for certificates of appropriateness required for new construction of principal 37 structures, except for single family and two family dwellings; 38 8. Planned development applications that are subject to review by the planning 39 commission as provided in Chapter 21A.55; and 40 9. Zoning map amendments. 41 42 43 SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.10.020.B. That 44 Subsection 21A.10.020.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Application, Public 45 Engagement, and Public Noticing Procedures: Public Hearing Notice Requirements: Special 46 Noticing Requirements for Certain Administrative Approvals) shall be, and hereby is amended to 47 read as follows: 48 B. Special Noticing Requirements for Administrative Approvals: 49 50 1. Notice of Application for Design Review and Planned Development: 51 52 a. Notification: At least twelve (12) days before a land use decision is made for an 53 administrative design review application as authorized in Chapter 21A.59 of this 54 title, or an administrative planned development as authorized by Chapter 21A.55 55 of this title, the planning director shall provide written notice to the following: 56 (1) All owners and identifiable tenants of the subject property, land abutting the 57 subject property, and land located directly across the street from the subject 58 property. In identifying the owners and tenants of the land the city shall use 59 the Salt Lake City geographic information system records. 60 (2) Recognized community organization(s) in which the subject property is 61 located. 62 63 b. Contents of the Notice of Application: The notice shall generally describe the 64 subject matter of the application, where the public may review the application, the 65 expected date when the planning director will authorize a final land use decision, 66 and the procedures to appeal the land use decision. 67 68 c. End of Notification Period: If the planning director receives comments identifying 69 concerns related to the design review application not complying with the 70 requirements of Chapter 21A.59, or the planned development not complying with LEGISLATIVE 3 71 the requirements of Chapter 21A.55, the planning director may refer the matter to 72 the planning commission for their review and decision on the application. 73 74 75 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.S. That 76 Subsection 21A.24.010.S of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 77 Provisions: Adaptive Reuse of a Landmark Building in Residential Districts) shall be, and hereby 78 is amended to read as follows: 79 80 S. Compliance with Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential zoning 81 districts shall comply with Section 9.28.040, “Noises Prohibited.”Adaptive Reuse Of A 82 Landmark Building In Residential Districts: 83 1. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the adaptive reuse of a landmark site in a residential 84 district is to preserve landmark sites as defined in subsection 21A.34.020B of this title. In some 85 instances these sites have outlived their original use due to economic conditions, size of the 86 building, and/or a substantial degree of deterioration of the historic property. Such sites, 87 however, still contribute to the welfare, property and education of the people of Salt Lake City 88 because of their historic, architectural or cultural significance. The Planning Commission shall 89 consider the allowance of a nonresidential use of a landmark site in a residential district 90 according to the qualifying provisions outlined in subsection S2a of this section and pursuant 91 to chapter 21A.54 of this title, in order to ensure that the residential character of the surrounding 92 environment is preserved. 93 2. Conditional Use Required: Where authorized by this title as shown in 94 section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of 95 this title, landmark sites in any residential district may be used for certain nonresidential uses. 96 a. Qualifying Provisions: In order to qualify for conditional use review by the 97 Planning Commission under section 21A.54.080, "Standards For Conditional Uses", of 98 this title, the applicant must demonstrate compliance with the following: 99 (1) The building is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City 100 register of cultural resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the 101 City accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 102 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the designation 103 and conditional use applications together. 104 (2) The landmark building shall have a minimum of seven thousand (7,000) 105 square feet of floor area, excluding accessory buildings. 106 (3) The new use will require minimal change as these features are important 107 in defining the overall historic character of the building and environment. 108 (4) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site. LEGISLATIVE 4 109 (5) Significant archaeological resources affected by the project shall be 110 protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures 111 shall be undertaken. 112 (6) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. 113 (7) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of 114 craftsmanship that characterize the property shall be preserved. 115 (8) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 116 structure or site including mature landscaping. 117 (9) The change in use from residential to nonresidential is necessary due to 118 the excessive size of the landmark site for residential uses allowed in the residential 119 district, and/or demonstration that the building cannot reasonably be used for its 120 original intended use. 121 (10) The proposed use will not have a material net cumulative adverse 122 impact on the neighborhood or the City as a whole by considering the following: 123 (A) The spatial distribution of: 124 (i) Business licenses issued for properties located within three 125 hundred feet (300') of any property line and the block frontage on both sides 126 of the street between 100 series addresses; and 127 (ii) Previously approved conditional uses for nonresidential uses 128 in landmark sites within the same planning community, as shown on a map of 129 planning communities maintained by the Zoning Administrator. 130 (B) Impacts on neighboring properties including, but not limited to: 131 (i) Traffic; 132 (ii) Parking; 133 (iii) Signs; 134 (iv) Lighting; 135 (v) Removal of landscaping; and 136 (vi) For the purposes of evaluating subsections S2a(10)(B)(i) 137 through S2a(10)(B)(v) of this section, professionally prepared impact studies 138 shall not be required unless specifically requested by the Zoning 139 Administrator; 140 (vii) Noise, fumes or odors; 141 b. Credit For On Street Parking: Some or all of the off street parking spaces 142 required in section 21A.44.030 of this title may be met by the provision of on street 143 spaces. Such credit shall require the site plan review approval. Requests for on street 144 parking shall meet the following requirements: LEGISLATIVE 5 145 (1) All on street parking facilities shall be designed in conformance with the 146 standards established by the City Transportation Engineer; 147 (2) Prior to approving any requests for on street parking, the development 148 review team shall determine that the proposed on street parking will not materially 149 adversely impact traffic movements and related public street functions; and 150 (3) Credit for on street parking shall be limited to the number of spaces 151 provided along the street frontage adjacent to the use. 152 153 SECTION 4. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.010.W. That 154 Subsection 21A.24.010.W of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: General 155 Provisions: Compliance with Noise Regulations Required) shall be, and hereby is repealed in its 156 entirety as follows: 157 158 W. Compliance With Noise Regulations Required: Any construction work in residential 159 zoning districts shall comply with section 9.28.040, "Noises Prohibited", of this Code. 160 161 SECTION 5. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.130.E.6. 162 That Subsection 21A.24.010.E.6 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RMF- 163 35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District: Minimum Yard Requirements: Existing 164 Yards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 165 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard 166 shall be no greater than the established setback line of the existing building unless the 167 proposed yard encroachment is to accommodate additional units. New principal 168 buildings must conform to current yard area requirements, unless the new principal 169 two-family dwelling or twin home has legal conforming status as outlined in 170 section 21A.38.070 of this title. 171 172 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.160.D. That 173 Subsection 21A.24.160.D of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RB 174 Residential/Business District: Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width) shall be, and hereby is LEGISLATIVE 6 175 amended only to eliminate the Land Use “A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail 176 or office uses” from the table in said subsection, with no other changes to the table: 177 178 179 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.24.180.I. That 180 Subsection 21A.24.180.I of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Residential Districts: RO 181 Residential/Office District: Offices in Existing Buildings on Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand 182 Square Feet) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 183 I. Offices iIn Existing Buildings oOn Lots Less Than Twenty Thousand Square Feet: 184 Offices occupying existing buildings are permitted on a five thousand (5,000) square foot 185 minimum lot. Additions to existing buildings that are greater than fifty percent (50%) of 186 the existing building footprint or that exceed the height of the existing building shall be 187 subject to design review (chapter 21A.59 of this title) unless the existing building is using 188 the incentives in 21A.52.060. 189 190 SECTION 8. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.26.010.K. That 191 Subsection 21A.26.010.K of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Commercial Districts: General 192 Provisions: Bed and Breakfast Establishments and Reception Centers in Landmark Sites in the 193 CN Neighborhood Commercial and CB Community Business Districts) shall be, and hereby is 194 repealed in its entirety as follows: 195 196 K. Bed And Breakfast Establishments And Reception Centers In Landmark Sites In The CN 197 Neighborhood Commercial And CB Community Business Districts: 198 1. Conditional Use Required: Where not otherwise authorized by this title and after 199 conditional use approval by the Planning Commission pursuant to chapter 21A.54 of this Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width A single dwelling unit located above first floor retail or office uses Included in principal use Included in principal use LEGISLATIVE 7 200 title, landmark sites in a CN or CB District may be used for a bed and breakfast 201 establishment or reception center subject to the following standards: 202 a. Standards: In addition to the standards for conditional uses, section 21A.54.080 of 203 this title, the Planning Commission shall find the following: 204 (1) The structure is designated as a landmark site on the Salt Lake City Register of 205 Cultural Resources. The designation process must be completed prior to the City 206 accepting a conditional use application for the structure unless the Planning 207 Director determines that it is in the best interest of the City to process the 208 designation and conditional use applications at the same time because of the risk 209 of probable demolition; 210 (2) The use is conducive to the preservation of the landmark site; 211 (3) The use is compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood; and 212 (4) The use does not result in the removal of residential characteristics of the 213 structure (if the structure is a residential structure), including mature landscaping. 214 b. Condition Of Approval: A preservation easement in favor of the City shall be placed 215 upon the landmark site. 216 217 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That Section 218 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 219 Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 220 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling, multi-family” and “Mixed use development” and to repeal 221 only the use category “Temporary use of closed schools and churches”, with no other changes to the 222 table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as follows: 8 223 Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse FR-1/ 43,560 FR-2/ 21,780 FR-3/ 12,000 R-1/ 12,000 R-1/ 7,000 R-1/ 5,000 SR-1 SR-2 SR-3 R-2 RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 RB R-MU- 35 R-MU- 45 R-MU RO Adaptive reuse for additiona l uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 C8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P86 Dwelling , multi- family P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P P P P P P P P P Mixed use develop ment P1 P P P P Temporar y use of closed schools and churches C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 C19 224 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 9 225 226 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.020. That the 227 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential 228 Districts of Section 21A.33.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 229 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Residential Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 230 notes “1”, “6”, “8” and “19” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as 231 follows: 232 1. Reserved. A single apartment unit may be located above first floor retail/office. 233 234 6. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not exceed 50 235 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent of the 236 building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design review 237 unless the building qualifies for the incentives in 21A.52.060. 238 239 8. Subject to conformance with the provisions of sSubsection 21A.52.060.A 21A.24.010S 240 of this title. 241 242 19. Reserved. Subject to section 21A.36.170 of this title. 243 244 245 246 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 247 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 248 Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be amended only as to the use category “Bed and 249 breakfast” and to repeal only the use categories “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House 250 museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception centers in landmark sites”, with no other 251 changes to the table, which aforementioned use categories shall read and appear in that table as 252 follows: 253 254 255 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse LEGISLATIVE 10 CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P Bed and breakfast manor C3 C3 P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010S of this title) C 257 258 259 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That the 260 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial 261 Districts of Section 21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 262 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 263 note “3” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 264 3. Reserved. When located in a building listed on the Salt Lake City register of cultural 265 resources (see subsections 21A.26.010S and 21A.26.010K of this title). 266 267 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.035. That Section 268 21A.33.035 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 269 Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area Districts) is amended only to repeal the use categories 270 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, “House museum in landmark sites” and “Offices and reception 271 centers in landmark sites”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Transit Station Area 272 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: LEGISLATIVE 11 273 Permitted and Conditional Uses by District TSA-UC TSA-UN TSA-MUEC TSA-SP Use Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Core Transition Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P P P P P House museum in landmark sites (see subsection 2 1A.24.010S of this title) P P P P P P P P Offices and reception centers in landmark sites (see subsection 21A.24.010. S of this title) P P P P P P P P 274 275 276 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That Section 277 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 278 Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 279 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for 280 Manufacturing Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse M-1 M-2 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site C C7 281 LEGISLATIVE 12 282 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.040. That the 283 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing 284 Districts of Section 21A.33.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 285 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as 286 to note “7” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 287 7. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 288 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent 289 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 290 review. 291 292 SECTION 16. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That Section 293 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 294 Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 295 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 296 Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P P P P4 298 299 SECTION 17. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.050. That the 300 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown 301 Districts of Section 21A.33.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 302 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to 303 note “4” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 304 4. Reserved. Building additions on lots less than 20,000 square feet for office uses may not 305 exceed 50 percent of the building's footprint. Building additions greater than 50 percent LEGISLATIVE 13 306 of the building's footprint or new office building construction are subject to a design 307 review (chapter 21A.59 of this title). 308 309 SECTION 18. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.060. That Section 310 21A.33.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 311 Conditional Uses in the Gateway District) shall be amended only to repeal the use category 312 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway 313 District, with no other changes to the table, as follows: Use G-MU Adaptive reuse of a landmark site P 314 315 SECTION 19. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That Section 316 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 317 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be amended only for the use categories 318 “Adaptive reuse of a landmark site” and “Dwelling: Multi-family”, in the Table of Permitted and 319 Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 14 320 Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse RP BP FP AG AG- 2 AG- 5 AG- 20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings of a landmark site C2 C2 C2 C2 P2 P2 Dwelling: Multi- family P2 P2 P2 P P 321 LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE 15 322 323 SECTION 20. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.070. That the 324 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose 325 Districts of Section 21A.33.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 326 Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only 327 as to note “2” which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 328 2. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. When located 329 in a building listed on the Salt Lake City Register of Cultural Resources. 330 331 SECTION 21. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That Section 332 21A.33.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of Permitted and 333 Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended only as to the use categories “Adaptive 334 reuse of a landmark site”, “Dwelling: Multi-family”, and “Reception center” and to repeal only the 335 use categories “House museum in a landmark”, and “Office and/or reception center in a landmark 336 site”, in the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts, with no other changes 337 to the table, as follows: Permitted and Conditional Uses by DistrictUse FB-UN1 FB-UN2 FB-MU11 FB-SC FB-SE Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible of a landmark buildings C9 P Dwelling: Multi-family P9 P P P P House museum in landmark site P P P P P Office and/or Reception center in a landmark site P P P P Reception center P P P P 338 339 LEGISLATIVE 16 340 SECTION 22. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.080. That the 341 “Qualifying Provisions” notes to the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based 342 Districts of Section 21A.33.870 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Land Use Tables: Table of 343 Permitted and Conditional Uses in Form Based Districts) shall be amended to add an additional note 344 “9”, which shall appear in numerical order with the other notes and read as follows: 345 9. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 346 347 SECTION 23. Repealing the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.36.170. That Section 348 21A.36.170 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: General Provisions: Reuse of Church and School 349 Buildings) is hereby repealed in its entirety as follows: 350 21A.36.170: RESERVEDUSE OF CHURCH AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS: 351 A. Change Of Use: In the PL, PL-2, I, UI or any residential district, a change of use of 352 any church or school to a use that is allowed as a permitted use or conditional use in the zoning 353 district may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this 354 title. 355 B. Temporary Use Of Closed Schools And Churches; Authorized As Conditional Use: The 356 temporary use of closed schools and churches may be allowed as a conditional use pursuant to 357 the provisions of chapter 21A.54 of this title, in the zoning districts indicated in the land use 358 tables of this title, provided that: 359 1. Use: The temporary use is for office space or educational purposes for public or private 360 charities. 361 2. Application: The application for a temporary use of a closed school or church shall 362 include, in addition to the application submission requirements of chapter 21A.54 of this title, the 363 following information: 364 a. Building Plans: As part of the application, the applicant shall provide a site plan drawn 365 to scale showing existing structures, auxiliary buildings, existing 366 parking and landscaping, and any proposed changes to the site. In converting the existing facility 367 to the proposed conditional use, no major exterior or interior alterations of the building shall be 368 made which render the building incompatible with a return to its use as a school or church; and 369 b. Use Plan: A proposed use plan including: LEGISLATIVE 17 370 (1) Hours and days of operation, 371 (2) Evidence of noise, odor or vibration emissions, 372 (3) Evidence of the number of classes, including hours taught, days taught, and the 373 expected class size, 374 (4) Average number of clients per day and the frequency of turnover of the clients, and 375 (5) Number of employees, staff or volunteers, both total and expected to be on the 376 premises at any given time. 377 3. Prohibition: No provision of this section shall be construed to allow any use in a 378 closed school or church for retail, residential or industrial purposes, or any use involving any 379 type of correctional or institutional facility. 380 4. Ownership: The School Board or church shall remain the owner of the property during 381 the period of time for which the conditional use is granted and any change of ownership away 382 from the School Board or church shall immediately cause the conditional use to terminate. 383 5. Automatic Termination Of Use: If the School Board or church group determines that no 384 future public or religious use will be made of the building as a public school or church, the 385 conditional use as granted under this section shall immediately cease and the property shall 386 thereafter be used only for uses permitted in the zoning district. 387 6. Temporary Use: The conditional use provided by this section shall be temporary only. 388 The time of such use shall be subject to the decision of the Planning Commission based on its 389 consideration of the criteria specified in subsection B7 of this section. The Planning Commission 390 may authorize the conditional use for a period not to exceed five (5) years, which may be 391 renewed for additional periods not in excess of five (5) years. 392 7. Termination For Excess Use: If the Planning Commission determines that the conditional 393 use is being used substantially in excess of the plan for use submitted pursuant to subsection B2b 394 of this section, the Planning Commission may, after an informal hearing, revoke the conditional 395 use if it determines that the excess use is having a negative impact on the neighborhood. 396 397 SECTION 24. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.44.060.A.1 That Subsection 398 21A.44.060.A.1 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 399 Parking Location and Design: Generally: Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building 400 Served), shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 401 1. Parking Located on Same Lot as Use or Building Served: All parking spaces required 402 to serve buildings or uses erected or established after the effective date of this 403 ordinance shall be located on the same lot or parcel as the building or use served, LEGISLATIVE 18 404 unless otherwise allowed pursuant to Subsection 21A.44.060.A.4, "Off-Site Parking 405 Permitted", or 21A.55.020, “Planned Developments – Authority”. 406 407 SECTION 25. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.020. That 408 Section 21A.52.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Applicability) shall 409 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 410 411 21A.52.020 APPLICABILITY: 412 A. This chapter applies as indicated within each subsection. 413 B. The planned development process in Chapter 21A.55 is not required as indicated within 414 this chapter. 415 C. The administrative planned development process in Chapter 21A.55, and the 416 administrative design review process in Chapter 21A.59 may be applicable as indicated 417 within this chapter. 418 419 SECTION 26. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.030. That 420 Section 21A.52.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Relationship to Base 421 Zoning District and Overlay Zoning Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as 422 follows: 423 424 21A.52.030: RELATIONSHIP TO BASE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OVERLAY 425 ZONING DISTRICTS: 426 Unless otherwise indicated in this chapter, all base zoning district or overlay zoning district 427 standards and requirements take precedence except as indicated in this section. 428 429 SECTION 27. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.52.040. That 430 Section 21A.52.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Approval Process) 431 shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 432 433 21A.52.040: APPROVAL PROCESS: LEGISLATIVE 19 434 Unless specifically exempted or modified by this chapter, all requirements of this title shall 435 apply. 436 A. Zoning Incentives: Applicants using the zoning incentives in this chapter shall submit a 437 zoning incentives application and provide the following information: 438 1. The applicant's name, address, telephone number and interest in the property to which 439 the incentives shall apply; 440 2. The owner's name, address and telephone number, if different than the applicant, and 441 the owner's signed consent to the filing of the application; 442 3. The street address, tax parcel number and legal description of the subject property; 443 4. The zoning classification, zoning district boundaries and present use of the subject 444 property; 445 5. The location of all existing and proposed buildings and structures, accessory and 446 principal, showing the number of stories and height, dwelling type, if applicable, 447 major elevations and the total square footage of the floor area by proposed use and 448 any additional information required for site plan review set forth in Chapter 21A.58; 449 6. The total number of dwelling units in the project, the number of affordable units, the 450 number of bedrooms in the affordable units, the location of the affordable units, and 451 level of affordability; and 452 7. Any additional information required by Chapter 21A.59 design review or 21A.55 453 planned development, to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this 454 chapter, as applicable; and 455 8. Any additional information the zoning administrator deems necessary to demonstrate 456 compliance with this chapter. 457 B. Preliminary approval shall authorize the preparation, filing and processing of applications 458 for any permits or approval that may be required by the city, including, but not limited to, 459 a building permit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no permits shall be issued until final 460 approval is obtained pursuant to this Chapter. Preliminary approval shall be valid for a 461 period of one year unless complete building plans have been submitted to the Division of 462 Building Services. 463 C. Administrative design review and administrative planned development, where applicable, 464 shall be exempt from the application fees and noticing fees otherwise required pursuant 465 to Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55. 466 D. Following the approval of any administrative design review or planned development 467 application, any future alteration to the property, building or site shall comply with the 468 approved design review application unless a modification is approved subject to the 469 process outlined in Chapters 21A.59 and 21A.55, as applicable. 470 E. Final approval shall occur following the recording of the restrictive covenant. 471 F. Preliminary and final approvals shall be administrative approvals by the planning director 472 or the planning director's designee. 473 474 SECTION 28. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.A. That 475 Subsection 21A.52.050.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable 476 Housing Incentives: Purpose) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 20 477 478 21A.52.050 AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES: 479 A. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section chapter are intended to encourage the 480 development of affordable housing. The provisions within this section are intended to 481 facilitate the construction of affordable housing by allowing more inclusive development 482 than would otherwise be permitted in the base zoning districts. Housing constructed using 483 the incentives is intended to be compatible in form with the neighborhood and provide for 484 safe and comfortable places to live and play. 485 486 SECTION 29. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3. 487 That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: 488 Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 489 490 3. Incentives in the CB Community Business, CC Corridor Commercial, CG General 491 Commercial, and I Institutional Zoning Districts: 492 a. The following housing types: row houses, sideways row houses, and cottage 493 developments are authorized provided the affordability requirements in 494 subsection b. are complied with;. 495 b. The minimum open space requirements in the I Institutional zoning district do 496 not apply. 497 c. To be eligible for the incentives listed in this subsection 3a., a development shall 498 meet the affordability requirements for Type C in Table 21A.52.050.G. 499 500 SECTION 30. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.52. That Chapter 501 21A.52 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended 502 to add a new Section 21A.52.060, with no other revisions to the chapter, to read as follows: 503 21A.52.060: BUILDING PRESERVATION INCENTIVES: 504 The provisions in this section provide optional incentives to development projects that include 505 the preservation of an existing building. The incentives located in Subsection 21A.52.060.A may 506 be combined with the incentives outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 507 A. Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings: 508 509 1. Purpose: To allow additional land uses in buildings that generally contribute to the 510 character of the city so they can be redeveloped for economically viable uses. These LEGISLATIVE 21 511 buildings may be underutilized or have outlived their original use due to economic 512 conditions, size of the building, a substantial degree of deterioration of the property, 513 or other factors. Eligible buildings may hold historical or cultural significance or 514 contribute to the existing neighborhood fabric through their architectural features, 515 size, or previous use. 516 517 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to adaptive reuse of a building 518 that meets the eligibility standards in 21A.52.060.A.3. 519 520 3. Eligibility Standards: 521 a. The following buildings are eligible for the incentives in this subsection: 522 (1) Landmark Sites; 523 (2) Buildings individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places; 524 (3) Buildings designed and formerly used for schools, hospitals, places of 525 worship, or other similar institutional uses; and 526 (4) Buildings that the planning director has deemed significant based on the 527 structure’s association with events that have contributed to broad patterns of 528 history, association with lives of persons important in the city’s past, or 529 displays distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of 530 construction. 531 b. Exterior features that are important in defining the overall character of the 532 building shall be retained. 533 c. Exterior alterations to the eligible building shall meet the standards in 534 21A.34.020.G. 535 d. The proposed use is conducive to the preservation of the building. 536 e. A change of use to a residential use is not permitted in the OS (Open Space) 537 zoning district. 538 f.If the eligible building is located in a residential zoning district, and the existing 539 use is residential, a change of use to nonresidential is not permitted. 540 g. Properties subject to the H Historic Preservation Overlay must obtain a Certificate 541 of Appropriateness in accordance with 21A.34.020. 542 4. Incentives: 543 a. Additional Uses: Unless prohibited by Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.a(1), any use 544 may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use in zoning districts where 545 Adaptive Reuse for Additional Uses in Eligible Buildings is listed in the land use 546 tables in Chapter 21A.33, subject to the provisions in this subsection and any 547 specific provisions applicable to the use in this title. Any conditional use shall be 548 reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards outlined in Chapter 21A.54. 549 (1) Prohibited Uses: A change of use to one of the following uses is prohibited: 550 Ambulance services (indoor and outdoor), amusement park, auditorium, bio- 551 medical facility, bus line station/terminal, bus line yard and repair facility, car 552 wash, check cashing/payday loan business, community correctional facility 553 (large and small), contractor’s yard/office, drive-through facility associated 554 with any use, equipment rental (indoor and outdoor), gas station, heliport, 555 hotel/motel, impound lot, intermodal transit passenger hub, jail, large wind 556 energy system, laundry and dry cleaning establishments, limousine service LEGISLATIVE 22 557 (large and small), heavy manufacturing, pet cemetery, recycling collection 558 station, sexually oriented business, sign painting/fabrication, storage 559 (outdoor), public storage (outdoor), wireless telecommunications facility, 560 homeless resource centers, and any other uses that are only allowed in the 561 manufacturing districts. 562 b. Parking and Loading: The following are the minimum off-street parking and 563 loading requirements for the eligible building. These minimums may be further 564 reduced with the alternatives to minimum parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 565 (1) Multi-Family: 0.5 off-street parking space per dwelling unit is required; 566 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 567 for the proposed use listed in the general context of the required off-street 568 parking table in 21A.44 may be reduced by 40%; 569 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 570 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 571 no additional parking shall be required; 572 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 573 c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements 574 of the zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In 575 the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 576 apply. 577 578 5. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 579 21A.52.060.A shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 580 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 581 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 582 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 583 with the land for the duration of the adaptive reuse and shall provide for the 584 following, without limitation: 585 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 586 conditions thereof; 587 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 588 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 589 important to the character of the building shall be preserved for the duration of the 590 adaptive reuse or if subject to 21A.34.020, indefinitely unless otherwise permitted 591 by the terms of a certificate of appropriateness; 592 c. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the potential 593 enforcement actions for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 594 595 6. Modifications to Approved Adaptive Reuse: Any modification to the use approved 596 under these incentives requires a new zoning incentives application. Any new 597 adaptive reuse shall also require a new zoning incentives application unless the new 598 use is permitted in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the zoning district. 599 600 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection A, or the restrictive covenant on the 601 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.A.5, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 602 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for LEGISLATIVE 23 603 violations as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 604 21A.52.060.A.5, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 605 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.A. 606 607 B. Preservation of a Principal Building: 608 609 1. Purpose: The incentives set forth in this section are intended to encourage the 610 preservation of buildings, supporting city goals related to sustainability, 611 neighborhoods, economy, and housing. The provisions are designed to support 612 developments that include preserving an eligible building by allowing flexibility with 613 certain zoning regulations while still maintaining the unique urban fabric and 614 character of neighborhoods. 615 616 2. Applicability: The incentives in this subsection apply to projects in all zoning districts 617 that preserve an existing principal building that meets the eligibility standards in 618 21A.52.060.B.3. These incentives may be applied to existing principal buildings and 619 new construction within the same development area. For the purposes of this 620 subsection, the development area may include multiple abutting lots or parcels. 621 622 3. Eligibility Standards: 623 a. Minimum Building Age: The existing building to be preserved shall be a 624 minimum of 50 years old. 625 b. Minimum Footprint of Eligible Building: The footprint of the eligible building to 626 be preserved covers a minimum of 25% of the development area. A lower 627 percentage may be considered by the planning director if the building has frontage 628 on a public street, contains a publicly accessible use such as retail, restaurant, or 629 entertainment, or would be highly visible from public spaces within the interior of 630 the site. 631 c. Retention of All Existing Principal Structures: In the FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R - 632 1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000, R-2, SR-1, SR-1A, SR-3, and all RMF zoning 633 districts, all existing principal structures included in the overall development area 634 shall be retained. 635 d. Modifications to Existing Building: A maximum of 25% of each street facing 636 building wall may be removed to accommodate modifications or additions. No 637 more than 50% of the building’s exterior walls may be removed. Portions of a 638 building wall with character defining architectural features shall not be removed. 639 e. Retention of Existing Active Commercial Uses: Eligible buildings with existing 640 active commercial uses with ground level street frontage are subject to the 641 following requirements. For the purpose of this subsection, active commercial 642 uses are those that support the vibrancy and usability of the public realm adjacent 643 to a building and encourage pedestrian activity and walk-in traffic. Active uses 644 may include retail goods/service establishments, restaurants, bars, art and craft 645 studios, or other uses determined to be substantially similar in terms of activation 646 by the planning director. 647 (1) A minimum of 50% of the length shall be retained along the street frontage in 648 the existing building or be included as part of the new development. If LEGISLATIVE 24 649 included in the new development, the active commercial use shall have the 650 primary entrance on the street frontage with direct public access from the 651 street frontage. 652 (2) The existing depth of the active commercial use shall be maintained or a 653 minimum depth of 25 feet, whichever is less. 654 (3) These requirements do not apply to nonconforming active commercial uses 655 with ground level street frontage. 656 657 4. Incentives: 658 a. Planned Development Waived: A planned development is not required for the 659 following: 660 (1) More Than One Principal Building Per Lot: More than one principal building 661 per lot is allowed without having frontage along a public street. 662 (2) Lots without Frontage on a Public Street: Lots do not require frontage on a 663 public street if necessary cross access easements are provided. 664 b. Administrative Planned Development: The following are authorized through an 665 administrative planned development pursuant to the procedures and standards in 666 Chapter 21A.55. The minimum planned development size required by 667 21A.55.060 does not apply: 668 (1) Modification to the minimum yard requirements. 669 (2) Modification to the open space and landscaping requirements when the 670 modification specifically relates to preserving the existing building(s). 671 (3) Modifications to the provisions for awnings and canopies, balconies, patios, 672 and porches in Table 21A.36.020.B, Obstructions in Required Yards. 673 (4) Modifications to the parking location and setback requirements in Table 674 21A.44.060.A. 675 (5) Parking within the boundary of a planned development area but located on a 676 different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is allowed and is 677 not considered off-site parking. The parking must only serve the uses within 678 the planned development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions 679 of this title. 680 c.Minimum Lot Area, Width & Coverage: 681 (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 682 width tables of the zoning district does not apply. 683 (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot 684 width tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning 685 districts: FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. 686 (3) RMF-30 zoning district: The minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 687 apply. 688 (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the 689 individual lot or parcel within the development area. 690 d.Height: Additional building height is authorized in zoning districts as indicated in 691 the following sections through administrative design review. The maximum 692 height per story of the additional building height incentive shall not exceed 12 693 feet. Administrative design review shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures 694 and standards in Chapter 21A.59. The additional height authorized by this LEGISLATIVE 25 695 subsection shall not be combined with the additional height authorized by 696 Subsection 21A.52.050, Affordable Housing Incentives. 697 698 (1) Residential districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive RMU-35 45’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RMU-45 55’, regardless of abutting use or zone. RB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RMU 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. RO 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 699 700 (2) Commercial Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive CB 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CN May build one additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CC 45’ CG 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building for properties in the boundary described in 21A.26.070.G. CSHBD1 105’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. CSHBD2 60’ and 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Transition 1 additional story equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. TSA-Core 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 701 LEGISLATIVE 26 702 (3) Form-based districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 90’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-MU11 125’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN2 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SC 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-SE 1 additional story equal to the average height of the other stories in the building. FB-UN1 3 stories and 30’ in height. 703 704 (4) Downtown districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive D-2 120’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. D-3 180’ and 3 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. 705 706 (5) Other districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive GMU 180’ and 2 additional stories equal to or less than the average height of the other stories in the building. MU 60’ provided that the additional height is for residential uses only. I Building heights in excess of 35' but not more than 75' provided, that for each foot of height over 35', each required yard shall be increased 1'. UI Building heights in excess of 75' but not more 120' provided that the additional height is supported by the master plan and compatible with the adjacent neighborhood. OS – Lots greater than 4 acres Building heights in excess of 45’ up to 60’ provided that for each foot of height over 45’, each required yard and landscaped yard shall be increased by 1’. 707 LEGISLATIVE 27 708 709 e. Administrative design review is permitted for the following: 710 (1) Buildings in the CSHBD1 or CSHBD2 zoning district that exceed 20,000 711 square feet in size. 712 (2) Buildings in the CB zoning district that exceed 7,500 gross square feet of floor 713 area for a first-floor footprint or in excess of 15,000 gross square feet floor 714 area. 715 f. Parking: The following are the minimum off-street parking requirements unless a 716 lesser requirement is listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44. 717 These minimums may be further reduced with the alternatives to minimum 718 parking calculations in 21A.44.050. 719 (1) Residential: 0.5 space per dwelling unit for multi-family; 1 space per dwelling 720 unit for all other residential uses. 721 (2) Nonresidential: The minimum number of required off-street parking spaces 722 for the proposed use listed in the required off-street parking table in 21A.44 723 may be reduced by 40%. 724 (3) Existing Parking Below the Minimum: If the existing parking for the eligible 725 building does not meet the minimum off-street parking requirements above, 726 no additional parking shall be required. 727 (4) Loading areas as indicated in Table 21A.44.070-A shall not be required. 728 729 g. Minimum Required Yards: The minimum required yards may apply to the 730 perimeter of the development area and not to the individual lot or parcel within 731 the development area. 732 733 5. Design Standards for New Construction: Unless a stricter design standard related to 734 each of the following is included in the base zone or Chapter 21A.37, the following 735 design standards are required for all zones except single and two-family zoning 736 districts: 737 a. Building Materials: Other than windows and doors, 50% of any street facing 738 facade shall be clad in durable materials. Durable materials include stone, brick, 739 masonry, textured or patterned concrete, fiber cement board or other material that 740 includes a minimum manufacturer warranty of 20 years from color fading, 741 weather, and local climate induced degradation of the material. Other materials 742 may be used for the remainder of the facade facing the street. Other materials 743 proposed to satisfy the durable requirement may be approved at the discretion of 744 the planning director if it is found that the proposed material is durable and is 745 appropriate for the proposed location on the building. 746 b. Glass: The surface area of the façade of each floor facing a street must contain a 747 minimum of 50% glass. If the ground level of the building is occupied by 748 residential uses that face the street the specified minimum glass requirement may 749 be reduced to 25%. 750 c. Maximum Length of a Blank Wall: The maximum length of any blank wall 751 uninterrupted by windows or doors at the ground floor level along any street 752 facing façade is 15 feet. Emergency exit doors and doors to access structured 753 parking or utility equipment shall not count as an interruption. LEGISLATIVE 28 754 d. Maximum Length of Street Facing Facades: 755 (1) The maximum length of each street facing building facade shall not exceed 756 100 feet in the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 districts. 757 (2) The maximum length of each street facing building façade shall not 758 exceed 175 feet in all other zoning districts. 759 e. Building Entrances: At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is 760 required for every street facing facade. Additional operable building entrances 761 shall be required on street facing facades every 40 feet for nonresidential uses and 762 every 75 feet for residential uses. All units adjacent to a public street shall have 763 the primary entrance on the street facing façade of the building with an 764 unenclosed entry porch, canopy or awning feature. 765 f. Garage Doors Facing Street: Garage doors are prohibited on the façade of the 766 building that is parallel to, or located along, a public street. 767 g. Screening of Mechanical Equipment: All mechanical equipment shall be screened 768 from public view and sited to minimize their visibility and impact. Examples of 769 siting include on the roof, enclosed or otherwise integrated into the architectural 770 design of the building, or in a rear or side yard area subject to yard location 771 restrictions found in Section 21A.36.020, Table 21A.36.020B, “Obstructions In 772 Required Yards”. 773 774 6. Restrictive Covenant Required: Any owner who uses the incentives in Subsection 775 21A.52.060.B shall enter into a legally binding restrictive covenant, the form of 776 which shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be 777 recorded on the property with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to issuance of a 778 building permit for a building using the incentives. The restrictive covenant shall run 779 with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: 780 a. Acknowledge the use of the incentives, the nature of the approval, and any 781 conditions thereof; 782 b. Shall guarantee that the physical elements of the eligible building used to qualify 783 for the incentives shall remain in substantially the same form and exterior features 784 important to the character of the building shall be preserved during the term; 785 c. Projects that apply the incentives to new buildings on the development site shall 786 guarantee retention of the eligible building used to qualify for the incentives for a 787 minimum term of 30 years or, if the eligible building is subject to 21A.34.020, 788 indefinitely unless otherwise permitted by the terms of a certificate of 789 appropriateness after such 30 year period; 790 d. The terms of compliance with all applicable regulations and the city’s potential 791 remedies for any violation of the restrictive covenant. 792 793 7. Enforcement: Violations of this Subsection B, or the restrictive covenant on the 794 property as set forth in 21A.52.060.B.6, shall be investigated and prosecuted pursuant 795 to 21A.20. The city shall have additional remedies or financial penalties for violations 796 as identified in the terms of the restrictive covenant required by Subsection 797 21A.52.060.B.6, which shall be reasonably related to enforcement of the 798 requirements and purpose of Subsection 21A.52.060.B. Financial remedies for a 799 violation of the covenant may include liquidated damages representing a reasonable LEGISLATIVE 29 800 estimate of the value of the incentives, plus other associated damages valued up to 801 20% of the tax assessed value of the preserved building over the three preceding 802 years. 803 804 805 SECTION 31. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.020. That 806 Section 21A.55.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Authority) shall 807 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 808 809 21A.55.020: AUTHORITY: 810 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with 811 modifications, deny, or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific 812 zoning standards outlined in 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying 813 provisions in 21A.52.060.B in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in 814 this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 815 located. 816 817 B. Planning Commission Review: The Pplanning Ccommission may approve planned 818 developments for uses listed in the tables of permitted and conditional uses for each 819 category of zoning district or districts. The approval shall be in accordance with the 820 standards and procedures set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the 821 district in which the property is located. 822 In approving a planned development, the Pplanning Ccommission may change, alter, 823 modify or waive the following provisions of this title: 824 1A. Zoning Aand Subdivision Regulations: Any provisions of this title or of the Ccity's 825 subdivision regulations as they apply to the proposed planned development except 826 that the Pplanning Ccommission cannot approve a use that is not allowed in the 827 zoning district in which the planned development is located, with the exception of 828 off-site parking as further described in this section. 829 2B. Off-Site Parking: Off-site pParking within the boundary of a planned development 830 area, but located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve, is 831 in zoning districts where off-site parking is not an allowed and not considered off- 832 site parking use. The parking must only serve the uses be located within the planned 833 development area unless otherwise authorized by other provisions of this title. 834 3C. Building Height: Up to five feet (5') of additional building height, except in the FR, 835 R-1, SR, or R-2 Zzoning Ddistricts where additional building height cannot be 836 approved through the planned development process. 837 4D. Density: Residential planned developments shall not exceed the density limitation 838 of the zoning district where the planned development is proposed except as allowed 839 below. The calculation of planned development density may include open space that 840 is provided as an amenity to the planned development. Public streets located within LEGISLATIVE 30 841 or adjacent to a planned development shall not be included in the planned 842 development area for the purpose of calculating density. 843 a1. In the RMF Zzoning Ddistricts and on lots 0.20 acres or more in size, 844 developments that change a nonconforming commercial use to a residential use 845 that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density limitations of 846 the zoning district when approved as a planned development. 847 848 SECTION 32. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.030. That 849 Section 21A.55.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Planning 850 Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 851 852 21A.55.030: PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 853 854 A. No Presumption Oof Approval: A request for a planned development does not constitute 855 an assurance or presumption that such planned development will be approved. Rather, 856 each proposed planned development shall be evaluated on an individual basis, in relation 857 to its compliance with the standards and factors set forth in this chapter and with the 858 standards for the zoning district in which it is located, in order to determine whether the 859 planned development is appropriate at a particular location. 860 861 B. Approval: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 862 planned developments, may approve a planned development as proposed or may impose 863 conditions necessary or appropriate for the planned development to comply with the 864 standards and factors set forth in this chapter. 865 866 C. Denial: The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of administrative 867 planned developments, may deny an application for a planned development if it finds that 868 the proposal does not meet the intent of the base zoning district, does not meet the 869 purpose of this chapter, or is not consistent with the standards and factors as set forth in 870 this chapter. 871 872 873 SECTION 33. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.040. That 874 Section 21A.55.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Procedures) 875 shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 876 877 21A.55.040: PROCEDURES: 878 LEGISLATIVE 31 879 A. Application: An application for a planned development shall be made on an application 880 form prepared by the zoning administrator and accompanied by applicable fees as noted 881 in the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. The applicant shall also be responsible 882 for payment of all mailing fees established for required public noticing. The applicant 883 must file an application for planned development approval with the Planning Director. A 884 complete application shall contain at least the following information submitted by the 885 applicant, unless certain information is determined by the zoning administrator Planning 886 Director to be inapplicable or unnecessary to appropriately evaluate the application. The 887 application submittal shall include one paper copy and one digital copy: 888 889 1. A complete description of the proposed planned development including the zoning 890 regulations being modified in the planned development and the planning objectives 891 being met; 892 2. When the proposed planned development includes provisions for common open space 893 or recreational facilities, a statement describing the provision to be made for the care 894 and maintenance of such open space or recreational facilities; 895 3. A written statement with supporting graphics showing how the proposed planned 896 development is compatible with other property in the neighborhood; 897 4. Plans, as required pursuant to sSection 21A.58.060 of this title, with the exception of 898 the number of copies required; 899 5. Architectural graphics including floor plans, elevations, profiles and cross sections; 900 6. A preliminary subdivision plat, if required; 901 7. Traffic impact analysis, where required by the City Transportation Division; and 902 8. Other information or documentation the zoning administratorPlanning Director may 903 deem necessary for proper review and analysis of a particular application. 904 905 B. Determination Oof Completeness: Upon receipt of an application for a planned 906 development, the zoning administratorPlanning Director shall make a determination of 907 completeness of the application pursuant to sSection 21A.10.010 of this title. 908 909 C. Public Notification and Engagement: 910 911 1. Notice of Application for Administrative Review: Prior to the approval of an 912 application that qualifies for administrative review, the planning director shall 913 provide written notice as provided in Chapter 21A.10.020.B. 914 915 2. Required Notice for Planning Commission Review: 916 a. Applications subject to planning commission review are subject to the notification 917 requirements of Chapter 2.60. 918 b. Any required public hearing is subject to the public hearing notice requirements 919 found in Chapter 21A.10. 920 921 Staff Report: Upon completing a site plan review and receiving recommendations from 922 applicable City department(s)/division(s), a staff report evaluating the planned development 923 application shall be prepared by the Planning Division and forwarded to the applicant and the 924 Planning Commission. LEGISLATIVE 32 925 926 D. Public Hearing: The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review the 927 planned development application in accordance with the standards and procedures set 928 forth in chapter 21A.10 of this title. 929 930 E. Planning Commission Action: Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission 931 shall decide, on the basis of the standards contained in section 21A.55.050 of this chapter 932 whether to approve, approve with modifications or conditions, or deny the application. 933 934 F. Notification Of Decision: The Planning Director shall notify the applicant of the decision 935 of the Planning Commission in writing, accompanied by one copy of the submitted plans 936 marked to show such decision and a copy of the motion approving, approving with 937 modifications, or denying the development plan application. 938 939 940 SECTION 34. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.050. That 941 Section 21A.55.050 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Standards for 942 Planned Developments) shall be, and hereby is amended, as to the preamble only with 943 Subsections A through G unchanged: 944 945 21A.55.050: STANDARDS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: 946 947 The Pplanning Ccommission, or the planning director in the case of an administrative planned 948 development, may approve, approve with conditions, or deny a planned development based upon 949 written findings of fact according to each of the following standards. It is the responsibility of the 950 applicant to provide written and graphic evidence demonstrating compliance with the following 951 standards: 952 953 954 SECTION 35. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.070. That 955 Section 21A.55.070 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Appeal of the 956 Planning Commission Decision) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 957 958 21A.55.070: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: 959 Any person adversely affected by a final decision of the Pplanning Ccommission or planning 960 director in the case of administrative planned developments, on an application for a planned 961 development may appeal to the Aappeals Hhearing Oofficer in accordance with the provisions LEGISLATIVE 33 962 of cChapter 21A.16 of this title. The filing of the appeal shall not stay the pending the outcome 963 of the appeal, except as provided for under sSection 21A.16.030F of this title. 964 965 SECTION 36. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.080. That 966 Section 21A.55.080 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Time Limit on 967 Approved Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 968 969 21A.55.080: TIME LIMIT ON APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 970 No planned development approval shall be valid for a period longer than one year unless a 971 building permit has been issued or complete building plans have been submitted to the Division 972 of Building Services and Licensing. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case 973 of an administrative planned development, may grant an extension of a planned development for 974 up to one additional year when the applicant is able to demonstrate no change in circumstance 975 that would result in an unmitigated impact. Extension requests must be submitted prior to the 976 expiration of the planned development approval. 977 978 SECTION 37. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.090. That 979 Section 21A.55.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Effect of 980 Approval of Planned Development) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: 981 982 21A.55.090: EFFECT OF APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: 983 The approval of a proposed planned development by the Pplanning Ccommission or planning 984 director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall not authorize the 985 establishment or extension of any use nor the development, construction, reconstruction, 986 alteration or moving of any building or structure, but shall authorize the preparation, filing and 987 processing of applications for any permits or approvals that may be required by the regulations 988 of the Ccity, including, but not limited to, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy and 989 subdivision approval. 990 991 SECTION 38. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.55.100. That 992 Section 21A.55.100 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Planned Developments: Modifications 993 to Development Plan) shall be and hereby is amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 34 994 995 21A.55.100: MODIFICATIONS TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 996 Following planned development approval, the development plan approved by the Pplanning 997 Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall 998 constitute the site design in relation to building placement and design, landscaping, mobility and 999 circulation elements, and any elements that were approved as zoning modifications through the 1000 planned development process. Modifications to the development plan may be allowed pursuant 1001 to this section. 1002 A. New Application Required Ffor Modifications Aand Amendments: No substantial 1003 Mmodifications or amendments shall be made in the construction, development or use 1004 without a new application under subject to the provisions of this section.title. Minor 1005 modifications or amendments may be made subject to written approval of the Planning 1006 Director and the date for completion may be extended by the Planning Commission upon 1007 recommendation of the Planning Director. 1008 B. Minor Modifications: The Pplanning Ddirector may authorize minor modifications to the 1009 approved development plan pursuant to the provisions for modifications to an approved 1010 site plan as set forth in chapter 21A.58 of this title when such modifications appear 1011 necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations necessary to comply with an 1012 adopted building, fire, or engineering code or standard or when the modification complies 1013 with the applicable standards in the underlying zoning district or overlay district. Such 1014 minor modifications shall be limited to the following elements: 1015 1. Adjusting the distance as shown on the approved development plan between any 1016 one structure or group of structures, and any other structure or group of structures, 1017 or any vehicular circulation element or any boundary of the site; 1018 2. Adjusting the location of any open space; 1019 3. Adjusting any final grade; 1020 4. Altering the types of landscaping elements and their arrangement within the 1021 required landscaping buffer area; 1022 5. Signs; 1023 6. Relocation or construction of accessory structures that comply with the provisions 1024 of 21A.40 and any applicable accessory structure regulations; or 1025 7. Additions which comply with the lot and bulk requirements of the underlying 1026 zone. 1027 Such minor modifications shall be consistent with the intent and purpose of this title and 1028 the development plan as approved pursuant to this chapter and shall be the minimum 1029 necessary to overcome the particular difficulty comply with the standards of the 1030 underlying zoning district or the applicable building, fire, or engineering code or standard LEGISLATIVE 35 1031 and shall not be approved if such modifications would result in a violation of any 1032 standard or requirement of this title. A minor modification shall not be approved if the 1033 modification reduces a required building setback, authorizes an increase in lot coverage, 1034 or increases building height. 1035 C. Major Modifications: Any modifications to the approved development plan not 1036 authorized by sSubsection B of this section shall be considered to be a major 1037 modification. The Pplanning Ccommission or planning director in the case of an 1038 administrative planned development, shall give notice to all property owners consistent 1039 with notification requirements located in chapter 21A.10 of this title. The Pplanning 1040 Ccommission or planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, 1041 may approve an application for a major modification to the approved development plan, 1042 not requiring a modification of written conditions of approval or recorded easements, 1043 upon finding that any changes in the plan as approved will be in substantial conformity 1044 with the approved development plan. If the commission or planning director in the case 1045 of an administrative planned development, determines that a major modification is not in 1046 substantial conformity with the approved development plan, then the commission or 1047 planning director in the case of an administrative planned development, shall review the 1048 request in accordance with the procedures set forth in this section. 1049 D. Other Modifications: Any modification to the planned development that complies with 1050 the standards of the underlying zoning district or overlay zoning district is allowed 1051 provided the modification does not violate a condition of approval or other requirement 1052 placed on the planned development as part of the approval of the application and required 1053 permits and approvals are obtained. 1054 1055 SECTION 39. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.59.020.A. That 1056 Subsection 21A.59.020 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Review: Authority: 1057 Administrative Review) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1058 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, 1059 deny or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific design standards when 1060 proposed as new construction, an addition or modification to the exterior of an existing 1061 structure, or a modification to an existing structure as authorized in Section 21A.59.040, 1062 Table 21A.59.040 of this chapter or when authorized in the specific zoning district 1063 elsewhere in this title. 1064 1. The director shall approve a request to modify a design standard if the director 1065 finds that the proposal complies with the purpose of the individual zoning district, 1066 the purpose of the individual design standards that are applicable to the project, 1067 the proposed modification is compatible with the development pattern of other 1068 buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, LEGISLATIVE 36 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 and the project is compliant with the applicable design review objectives (Section 21A.59.050 of this chapter). 2. The director may approve a request to modify a design standard with conditions or modifications to the design if the director determines a modification is necessary to comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards of the base zoning, to achieve compatibility with the development pattern of other buildings on the block face or on the block face on the opposite side of the street, or to achieve the applicable design review objectives. 3. The director shall deny a request to modify a design standard if the design does not comply with the purpose of the base zoning district, the purpose of the applicable design standards or the applicable design review objectives and no modifications or conditions of approval can be applied that would make the design comply. 4. The director may forward a request to modify a design standard to the planning commission if the director finds that the request for modification is greater than allowed by this chapter, a person receiving notice of the proposed modification can demonstrate that the request will negatively impact their property, or at the request of the applicant if the director is required to deny the request as provided in this section. SECTION 40. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.62.040. That 1091 Section 21A.62.040 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Definitions: Definitions of Terms) shall 1092 be, and hereby is amended to read as follows: 1093 a. Amending the definition of “ADAPTIVE REUSE OF A LANDMARK 1094 BUILDING.” That the definition shall be amended to read as follows: 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 ADAPTIVE REUSE FOR ADDITTIONAL USES IN ELIGIBLE OF A LANDMARK BUILDINGS: The process of reusing a building for a purpose other than which it was built or designed for landmark buildings original use is no longer feasible. Other land uses, in addition to those specifically listed in the land use tables, may be allowed as a permitted or conditional use subject to the provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.A. b. Amending the definition of “PARKING, OFF SITE.” That the definition of 1102 “PARKING, OFF SITE” shall be amended to read as follows: LEGISLATIVE 37 1103 PARKING, OFF SITE: An off-street parking area intended to serve one or more uses and that is 1104 located on a different parcel or lot than the use(s) it is intended to serve. Parking approved within 1105 the boundary of a planned development that only serves uses within the planned development 1106 area is not considered off-site parking. 1107 c. Repealing the definition “HOUSE MUSEUM IN A LANDMARK SITE” as 1108 follows: 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 HOUSE MUSEUM IN LANDMARK SITE: A dwelling unit which is converted from its original principal use as a dwelling unit to a staffed institution dedicated to educational, aesthetic or historic purposes. Such museum should include a staff who commands an appropriate body of special knowledge necessary to convey the historical, aesthetic or architectural attributes of the building and its collections to the general public. Such staff should also have the ability to reach museological decisions consonant with the experience of his or her peers and have access to and acquaintance with the literature of the field. Such museum should maintain either regular hours or be available for appointed visits such that access is reasonably convenient to the public. SECTION 15. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 1119 first publication. 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 2024. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , CHAIRPERSON 1125 1126 1127 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor’s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 1139 1140 1141 1142 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) LEGISLATIVE 38 1143 Bill No. of 2024. 1144 Published: . 1145 Adaptive Reuse Preservation Incentives_Opt1(legislative)v1 1146 3.CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00155 February 16, 2023 Mayor Mendenhall signed the petition initiation April 17, 2023 Initial information posted to the city’s online open house webpage April 20, 2023 Initial information emailed to recognized organizations, focus group and stakeholders, for the purpose of gathering early feedback to inform the draft ordinance July 18, 2023 All recognized organizations were sent the 45-day required notice for text amendments that included a draft ordinance for review. Focus group and stakeholders were also provided with updated information with a draft ordinance for review August 3, 2023 A briefing was held with the Historic Landmark Commission on the proposal August 21, 2023 The proposal was presented to the Sugar House Land Use Committee. September 27, 2023 The Planning Commission held a briefing to review the proposal October 11, 2023 The proposal was presented to the Business Advisory Board October 19, 2023 Public hearing notice posted to city and state websites and a notice of the hearing was posted in the following public libraries: Main, Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch, Marmalade, Fairpark, Glendale and Sprague. October 26, 2023 Staff report for Historic Landmark Commission hearing posted to Planning’s website November 2, 2023 The Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to City Council February 15, 2024 Public hearing notice posted city and state websites and a notice of the hearing was posted in the following public libraries: Main, Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch, Marmalade, Fairpark, Glendale and Sprague. February 21, 2024 Staff report for Planning Commission hearing posted to Planning’s website. February 28, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to City Council April 3, 2024 Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office April 22, 2024 Final ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office April 23, 2024 Transmitted to CAN Administration 4.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00155 – A petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall for a text amendment that would make changes to the zoning ordinance to support adaptive reuse and preservation of existing buildings. The goal of this proposed text amendment is to remove zoning barriers that prevent the reuse of buildings and offer zoning incentives to encourage a building to be reused rather than demolished. The proposed amendments involve multiple chapters of the Zoning Ordinance and would apply citywide. DATE: Date #1 and Date #2 PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions related to this proposal, please call Amy Thompson at 801-535-7281 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday or via e-mail amy.thompson@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00155. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 5.PETITION INITIATION To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Nick Norris, Planning Director From: Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director Date: February 10, 2023 Re: Initiate Petition to Amend Text in the Zoning Ordinance to Establish Regulations for the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings The Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a petition directing the Planning Division to make changes to the zoning ordinance to support adaptive reuse of existing buildings. The overall purpose of these zoning changes is to support and implement existing City plans and policies related to housing, historic preservation, sustainability and economic development. Adaptive reuse is both a sustainable practice and a vital a planning tool that aids in meeting the City’s various goals. The adaptive reuse of an existing structure retains a buildings original form while bypassing wasteful demolition. This process keeps substantial amounts of materials out of landfills and reduces energy consumption. Additionally, preserving these buildings which are often times historic or contain elements of unique architectural detailing, helps maintain neighborhood character and breathes new life into buildings that contribute to neighborhood fabric. Adaptive reuse allows existing buildings to serve our community for generations to come while continuing to tell the story of those who came before us. As part of this petition the Planning Division will work with Sustainability to find ways to improve the function and performance of existing buildings to reduce their environmental impact in exchange for relaxing or modifying zoning regulations that may deter or prohibit the reuse of existing buildings. The purpose of this zoning text amendment is to: •Create a mechanism to allow for the adaptive reuse of buildings while maintaining and protecting the neighborhood’s historic built form and character; •Identify City codes and policies that effectively serve as barriers to the adaptive reuse of existing buildings; •Identify a process for reviewing adaptive reuse projects; and, •Identify possible incentives for projects that include an adaptive reuse component such as modifications to setbacks, height, density, parking, lot width and lot coverage. As part of the process, the Planning Division will follow the City adoption process for zoning text amendments, which includes citizen input and public hearings with the Historic Landmark Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. Changes will be made to Title 21A: Zoning Ordinance but other chapters within the city code may also be changed if identified as necessary. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Please contact me at 385-214-5311or michaela.oktav@slc.gov.com if you have any questions. TI1ank you. C-011cm·rence to initiate tlte zoning text amendment petition as noted aboue. 02/16/2023 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date •Page2 6.ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From:Turner Bitton To:Planning Public Comments Subject:(EXTERNAL) Comments for Tonight"s Meeting Date:Wednesday, February 28, 2024 5:02:56 PM Hello, I’m writing on behalf of SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors to express our comments on items on tonight’s agenda. I have written out each of our comments below to correspond with each agenda item that we would like to submit comments on: 1) Parking Text Amendment: PLNPCM2023-00646 SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors strongly supports this proposal and encourages the planning commission to approve the proposal. Salt Lake City continues to need more housing, and the parking amendment is a way of preserving existing housing stock and preventing the creation of more unnecessary parking. In short, the proposal prioritizes people over parking and reflects our shared values. 2) Adaptive Reuse Text Amendment: PLNPCM2023-00155 SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors strongly supports the proposed adaptive reuse text amendments and thanks the planning staff for their comprehensive approach to the issue. Older buildings contribute to the culture, health, and vitality of neighborhoods. The proposal is thoughtfully crafted in a way that will provide new housing opportunities and types while also enhancing Salt Lake City's built environment. We encourage the planning commission to approve the proposal. —— Thanks for the opportunity to weigh in and for all of your work. Thank you, Turner C. Bitton (he/him) Executive Director SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors (801) 564-3860 www.slcneighbors.org jill love jill love (May 2, 2024 14:54 MDT) Email:jill.love@slcgov.com Signature: Item B2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:July 2, 2024 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at 1544 and 1550 South 900 West PLNPCM2024-00128 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:July 2, 2024 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at 1544 and 1550 South 900 West PLNPCM2024-00128 BRIEFING UPDATE The Council did not have any questions or comments at the June 4, 2024 briefing. The following information was provided for June 4, 2024 Council briefing. It is included again for background purposes. The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for two vacant parcels at 1544 and 1550 South 900 West from their current R-1/7,000 (single-family residential) to RMF-30 (low density multi-family residential). Combined, the parcels total approximately 0.82 acres. The proposed zoning would allow more density on the parcels. In their application, the petitioner included a draft site plan showing 18 for sale townhomes on the subject parcels. (It is worth noting that the petitioner owns adjacent parcels at 1549, 1551, and 1565 South 1000 West that were rezoned from R-1/7,000 to RMF-30 in July 2023.) The draft site plan shows a total of 46 two- and three-bedroom townhomes on the five parcels, though other uses allowed under RMF-30 zoning such as small-scale multi-family, twin homes, cottage developments, or tiny homes could be built if the zoning map amendment is approved by the Council. The petition for this proposed rezone was received prior to the Community Benefit & Tenant Displacement ordinance adoption, so it is subject to requirements in place at that time. Since the properties are vacant, there is no loss of housing. Additionally, in their application narrative the petitioner stated their plan is to include a publicly accessible open space on a 30-foot Public Utilities easement on the south side of their Item Schedule: Briefing: June 4, 2024 Set Date: June 11, 2024 Public Hearing: July 2, 2024 Potential Action: July 9, 2024 Page | 2 proposed development. It is described as a “walking path with natural features and vegetation” that would also provide a mid-block connection between 900 and 1000 West. The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its April 10, 2024 meeting and held a public hearing at which one person spoke in support. Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the Council. As shown in the zoning map below, area zoning is a mix of single- and two-family residential (R-1/5,000, R-1/7,000, R-2), low- and moderate-density multi-family residential (RMF-30, RMF-35), community business (CB), and light manufacturing (M-1 (gray shaded area in lower right corner)). Area zoning map with subject parcels highlighted in red. Adjacent parcels outlined in green are owned by the petitioner and anticipated to be part of a future development. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTION 1. During their presentation to the Planning Commission, the petitioner referenced the proposed townhomes to be sold at an attainable price. The Council may wish to ask what the anticipated price range will be. Page | 3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. No formal site plan has been submitted to the City nor is it within the scope of the Council’s authority to review the plans. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 3-5 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – Compliance with City Goals, Policies, and General Plans Planning staff found that the proposed zoning map amendment supports initiatives in Plan Salt Lake (2015) including Growth and Housing. In addition, the 2014 Westside Plan identifies vacant or underutilized parcels such as those that are the subject of this proposed rezone as opportunities for infill development for multi-family projects. It is Planning staff’s opinion that rezoning the parcels to RMF-30 would be consistent with the plan’s guidance. Consideration 2 – R-1/7,000 vs. RMF-30 Zoning District Comparison As previously mentioned, RMF-30 zoning allows greater development potential than R-1/7,000. That said, development in RMF-30 is intended to be compatible with surrounding low-density neighborhoods. In addition, RMF-30 zoning includes design standards and encourages a higher level of development. Attachment D (pages 21-23) of the Planning Commission staff report includes a table comparing the zoning districts. A portion of the table is included below. For additional information please see the staff report. R-1/7,000 (Current)RMF-30 (Proposed) Maximum Building Height 28 feet 30 feet Minimum Lot Size 7,000 square feet 1,500 square feet/unit (cottage/tiny house) 2,000 square feet/unit (other single- and multi-family uses) 5,000 square feet/unit (non-residential) Minimum Lot Width 50 feet None Maximum Lot Width -110 feet Minimum Corner Side Yard 20 feet or average of block face 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard 25 feet 10 feet Landscape Yard -Front and corner side yards to be maintained as landscape Page | 4 yards Landscape Buffers -10 feet required for multi- family, row house, and non- residential uses Maximum Building Coverage 40%50% Design Standards Durable Building Materials: ground floor -50% Durable Building Materials: upper floors -50% Glass: ground floor -20% Glass: upper floors -15% Building Entrances -At least one operable building entrance on the ground floor is required for every street facing façade Screening of Mechanical Equipment -X Screening of Service Areas -X Entry Features -X Parking Minimum off-street parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit (single-family). 2 spaces per dwelling unit (single-family attached or detached), twin home, two-family. 1 space per dwelling unit (cottage development). Multi-family: 1 space per dwelling unit (studio and one-bedroom) 1.25 space per dwelling unit (2+ bedrooms) Consideration 3 – Neighborhood Analysis Planning staff noted the adjacent properties to the west discussed above which were rezoned to RMF-30 last year. In addition, there is a large parcel on 900 West to the south of the subject parcels that is zoned CB and is platted for 70 townhomes. It is Planning staff’s opinion that the request to rezone to RMF-30 is Page | 5 appropriate given multiple new developments in this neighborhood that will provide family-sized housing in the area. Analysis of Standards Attachment E (pages 24-26) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties Complies Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies City Department Review During City review of the petitions, no responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal but stated additional review, permits, and utility upgrades would be required if the property is developed. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • February 5, 2024-Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • February 12, 2024-Petition assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner. • February 15, 2024- o Notice sent to Glendale Community Council. o Early notification sent to residents and property owners within 300 feet of the project site. • February - April 2024-Online open house hosted to solicit public comments on the proposal. • March 29, 2024- Page | 6 o Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing posted on the property and mailed to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject properties. o Notice of public hearing posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning Division listserv. • April 10, 2024- Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • April 29, 2024-Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office. • May 7, 2024-Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • May 13, 2024-Transmittal received in City Council Office. _______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL rachel otto (May 13, 2024 15:42 MDT)Date Received:05/13/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date sent to Council:05/13/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 05/13/24 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2024-00128 - Zoning Map Amendment at 1544 S 900 W & 1550 S 900 W STAFF CONTACT: Andy Hulka, Principal Planner 801-535-6608 or andy.hulka@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the petition for a zoning map amendment. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Paul Garbett (Garbett Homes), representing the property owner, has submitted a petition to amend the Zoning Map for two parcels located at 1544 S 900 W and 1550 S 900 W. The requested Zoning Map Amendment would rezone the property from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to RMF- 30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential). The total area included in the proposal is approximately 0.82 acres or about 35,719 sq. ft. This petition was accepted prior to the adoption of the new Community Benefit and Tenant Displacement Amendments, which require applicants to provide specific information about plans for future development. While the ordinance did not require the applicant to submit full SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 development plans, the applicant did include a site plan in their written narrative illustrating their intent to build townhomes on the property. Current Zoning Proposed Zoning The primary difference between the R-1/7,000 and RMF-30 Zoning Districts is the allowed building types. The RMF-30 land use table lists tiny homes, cottage developments, twin homes, single-family attached dwellings, and multi-family dwellings as permitted uses. The Westside Plan encourages the use of vacant parcels as opportunities for multi-family projects. On April 10th, 2024, the Planning Commission heard the petition and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the zoning map. PUBLIC PROCESS: •Early Notification – On February 15, 2024, the Glendale Neighborhood Council was sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The Community Council provided a written statement of support for the project. Noticing signs were posted on the property and a notice of the proposal was also mailed to all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the property. An online open house was posted on the Planning Division’s website from February to April. •Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on April 10th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The full public meeting can be viewed using this link starting at minute 43:10. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of April 10th, 2024 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of April 10th, 2024 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of April 10th, 2024 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance 2. Project Chronology 3. Notice of the City Council Public Hearing 4. Mailing List 1. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2024 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to two parcels located at 1544 S 900 W and 1550 S 900 W from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential to RMF-30 Low Density Multi Family Residential) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to two parcels located at 1544 S 900 W and 1550 S 900 W (“Property”) from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential to RMF-30 Low Density Multi Family Residential pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2024-00128. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (”Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on April 10, 2024, on an application submitted by Paul Garbett of Garbett Homes, on behalf of the property owner, to rezone the Property from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential to RMF-30 Low Density Multi Family Residential pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2024-00128. WHEREAS, at its April 10, 2024, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the Property, as more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential to RMF-30 Low Density Multi Family Residential. 1 ___________________________ atherine D. Pasker, Senior City A SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2024. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on . Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of 2024. Published: . Ordinance Rezoning 1544 and 1550 S 900 W to RMF-30_v1 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: May 7, 2024 By: _ K ttorney EXHIBIT “A” 1544 S 900 W Tax ID: 15-14-253-031-0000 COM 265 FT S FR INTERSECTION OF FENCE LINE & 8TH WEST STREET (NOW 9TH WEST STREET) SD INTERSECTION BEING 825 FT E & 1278.75 FT N FR SW COR NE ¼ SEC 14 T1S R1W SL MER W 280 FT S 53 FT E 280 FT N 53 FT TO BEG .34 AC. 1550 S 900 W Tax ID: 15-14-253-032-0000 COM 318 FT S FR INTERSECTION OF FENCE LINE & 8TH WEST STREET (NOW 9TH WEST) SD INTERSECTION BEING 825 FT E & 1278.75 FT N FR SW COR NE ¼ SEC 14 T1S R1W SL MER W 280 FT S 72 FT M OR LE TO OLD FENCE LINE E LY ALG SD FENCE 280 FT TO W LINE OF 8TH WEST (NOW 9TH WEST) STREET N 78.1 FT M OR L TO BEG .48 AC. 3 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2024-00128 February 5, 2024 Petition for the zoning map amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. February 12, 2024 Petition assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner. February 15, 2024 Information about the proposal was sent to the Glendale Neighborhood Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. February 15, 2024 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Feb – Apr 2024 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. March 29, 2024 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting on April 10, 2024. Public hearing notice mailed. April 10, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 10, 2024. By a unanimous vote of 7-0, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-00128 – Zoning Map Amendment at 1544 S 900 W & 1550 S 900 W – Paul Garbett (Garbett Homes), representing the property owner, is requesting a zoning map amendment for the properties located at the above-stated address. The two parcels are approximately 0.82 acres (35,719 sq. ft.) in size. The proposal would rezone the properties from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) to RMF30 (Low Density Multi- Family Residential). No development plans were submitted with this application. The subject property is within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit https://www.slc.gov/council/agendas/. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Andy Hulka at 801-535-6608 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at andy.hulka@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://aca- prod.accela.com/SLCREF/Default.aspx, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00923. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP CLAIRE CULLINANE; CHRISTINE NELSON (JT)1505 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 DANIEL J ROBERTSON; SARAH ROBERTSON (JT)942 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JORGE SALVADOR ZAMORA; MARIA ISABEL VAZQUE 932 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ESTHER MUNOZ; ANASTACIO HERNANDEZ (JT)922 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AURELIA VEGA 912 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MICHAEL J TOMCZAK; KAREN A DREFUS (JT)3386 S LOS ALTOS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 MICHAEL G NIELSEN 1521 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JAMES W JR HEATH; DUSTIN HEATH (JT)1525 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 HECTOR TORRES; OTILIA TORRES (JT)1228 E TURQUOISE WY SANDY UT 84094 TAG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 RENE MARTINEZ 1561 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GEORGE RAUSCH LIVING TRUST 06/01/2017 1579 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MAFUA VAILOLO; TELESIA M OTUKOLO (JT)1585 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AJ HEALTHY LIFE LLC 1532 S 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LUIS MUNOZ; MICHELE AILENE GERO (JT)1526 S 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 RICARDO VAZQUEZ 13287 HERRIMAN ROSE BLVD HERRIMAN UT 84096 JS FM TRST 679 N DESOTO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JUAN MUNOZ; DELIA MUNOZ (JT)3487 W BRISTOL WY WEST VALLEY UT 84119 HANH THI NGUYEN; TRIEU MINH PHAM (TC)1529 S RIVERSIDE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ARON CARDENAS 1515 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JAIME A VEGA; R ISABEL VEGA (JT)941 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MARGARITA GERARDO; ASHLEY GABRIELA FRIAS GE 931 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 TRANG TQ LE 921 W CANNON OAKS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BHAGAWATI PAUDEL‐ GAUTAM; MANI GAUTAM (JT 1021 BEXLEY DR N SALT LAKE UT 84054 DAVID C CAPSON 1567 S 1000 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MATTHEW E SHAPIRO 4491 E RUSTIC KNOLLS LN FLAGSTAFF AZ 86004 MESERET DEMEKE 1512 S CANNON OAKS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 UTAH STATE BUILDING OWNERSHIP AUTHORITY 450 N STATE OFFICE # 4110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 STATE OF UTAH, DIVISION OF FACITLITIES CONSTRU 4315 S 2700 W TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129 SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 TAG 900 HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 STATE OF UTAH DEPT OF ADM SERVICES DIV FAC CO 450 N STATE OFFICE BLDG SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 Current Occupant 1513 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1535 S 1000 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1549 S 1000 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1551 S 1000 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1536 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1540 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1544 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1550 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1560 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1568 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1574 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 911 W CANNON OAKS PL Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1565 S 1000 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1511 S 1000 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1515 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1519 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1533 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1575 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1595 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1601 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1590 S 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Item B3 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members DATE:July 2, 2024 RE:Compensation Adjustments for Executive Municipal MOTION 1 Close and Adopt I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance confirming the compensation adjustments for Executive Municipal Officers. MOTION 2 Close and Refer I move that the Council close the public hearing and refer action to a future meeting.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  1   CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 2, 2024 TO: Council Chair Victoria Petro Council Vice Chair Chris Wharton Council Members PREPARED BY: Katie Lewis, City Attorney Rachel Otto, Mayor’s Chief of Staff RE: Initial Discussion Regarding Major Terms in Capital City Revitalization Zone Participation Agreement REQUESTED ACTION: Briefing July 2, 2024; follow up briefing on July 9, 2024; Consider approving a resolution endorsing the Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area and Participation Agreement on July 9, 2024 POLICY ITEM: Capital City Revitalization Zone BUDGET IMPACTS: This briefing is the first discussion of the proposed deal points of a Participation Agreement between Salt Lake City (City) and Smith Entertainment Group (SEG). - The potential next step will be a follow up briefing and vote by the Council to endorse the Participation Agreement and Project Area on July 9, 2024. - This is the first step towards the adoption of an additional .5% sales tax City-wide to be dedicated to the renovation of Delta Center and construction of a sports, entertainment, culture, and convention district. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For decades, residents of the City and the State of Utah have supported and enjoyed the presence of professional sports downtown, and the teams are an integral part of the community. During the 2024 general legislative session, the Utah legislature passed the Capital City Revitalization Zone Act, Utah Code 63N-3-1301, et seq. (the Act), which authorizes the City to levy a .5% sales and use tax for thirty years (Revitalization Tax) to be used for the benefit of revitalization projects within a designated project area at and around Delta Center, which is the home arena to the existing NBA franchise and the new NHL franchise. Under the Act, the City may initiate the process to impose the Revitalization Tax upon receiving an application from an entity that is a party to one or more professional sports franchise agreement(s) and that will play their home games in an arena downtown. Upon receipt of an application, the City and applicant may negotiate the terms of a proposed project area and participation agreement. If the City endorses the proposed project area and participation agreement, the City will provide notice of the endorsement to the state’s Revitalization Zone Committee, which committee has been established pursuant to Utah Code 63N-3-1307.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  2   Upon receipt of the City’s endorsement, the Revitalization Zone Committee has 30 days to review the proposed project area and participation agreement. If the Revitalization Zone Committee endorses the project area and participation agreement, the Committee will send notice of the endorsement back to the City for final approval and adoption of the Revitalization Tax and approval/execution of the participation agreement. SEG owns the Utah Jazz, the NBA franchise, and the Utah Hockey Club, the NHL franchise, whose home games are both played at Delta Center. On April 4, 2024, SEG applied to the City requesting the City impose Revitalization Tax to support a proposed remodel of Delta Center and construction of a sports, entertainment, culture, and convention district in downtown Salt Lake City. Upon receipt of the application, SEG and the City are negotiating a proposed project area that meets the requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1302 (Project Area) and a proposed participation agreement that meets the requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1305 (Participation Agreement). SUMMARY OF TERMS: The Project Area and Participation Agreement are being finalized and will be transmitted to the Council by July 5, 2024, at the latest. An overview of the terms is provided below.  Project: SEG will design, develop, construct and complete renovations to Delta Center to make it a first-class arena for the NBA and NHL teams. In collaboration with Salt Lake County, SEG also intends to develop portions of the two blocks east of Delta Center as a sports, entertainment, culture, and convention district. The Delta Center remodel and the development of the sports, entertainment, culture, and convention district is described here as the “District”. o During the design and construction of the District, SEG will use commercially reasonable efforts to use sustainable development elements into the improvements and SEG will endeavor to incorporate its construction contract bidding process readily available to and easily accessible to small-, minority-, veteran-, and/or woman-owned contractors and subcontractors. o The City will require design guidelines in a separate development agreement for the construction of the District. o By the tenth anniversary of the Participation Agreement, SEG will complete and make operational all elements of the District which are funded by the Revitalization Sales Tax.  Maximum Dollar Amount: The maximum amount of net bond proceeds that SEG may receive is $900,000,000. This will be paid from the Revitalization Tax collected by the City over thirty years, which is anticipated to generate revenues of approximately $1.2 billion (present value) over the 30- year life of the agreement. o Of the $900,000,000, SEG currently estimates that it will spend $525,000,000 in costs for the Delta Center remodel and $375,000,000 in costs for the other district improvements.  City Administrative Fee: The City will receive up to 1% of the Revitalization Tax over the thirty year period to reimburse the City for its costs incurred to create and administer the Project Area as an administrative fee.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  3    Public benefits: In exchange for the commitment of public funding for the remodel of Delta Center and construction of the sports, culture, convention, and entertainment district, SEG commits to the following public benefits for Salt Lake City: o Ticket fee: Starting on July 1, 2025, SEG will impose a fee on each ticket sold for events at Delta Center. The amount of the ticket fee will be: a fee of $1 per ticket if the ticket price is $25 or less; a fee of $2 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $25 but less than $200; and a fee of $3 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $200.  The ticket fee will be delivered to the City, to be deposited in a separate City- managed account (Public Benefit Account), to be spent on family-sized and affordable housing and other public benefit initiatives as determined by the City, and other initiatives the City identifies. o Community Support; Workforce Development: SEG will support community and workforce development initiatives by establishing or providing:  Apprenticeship Programs: During construction, maintenance, and operation of the District, SEG will encourage local community partners to train a diverse and competent workforce to become apprentices in sport-related trades. SEG will focus on individuals from communities in Salt Lake City from households that qualify for free or reduced lunch or otherwise meet the Income Eligibility Guidelines published by the Utah State Board of Education (Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families). SEG will conduct at least three in- person outreach events per year.  College internship programs: SEG will offer at least fifteen (15) paid internships per year for college students (with a goal of twenty-five percent (25%) of such students with demonstrated financial need), for careers in the sports business. The internships must be primarily on-site and in-person within the NHL team, the NBA team, or SEG.  High school shadowing programs: SEG will work with the NHL team and the NBA team to offer a shadowing program for at least ten (10) local high school students (with a goal of fifty percent (50%) of such students who are Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families) which will provide them the opportunity to shadow in person a staff member or department within the professional sports team organization or SEG, or the operator of the Delta Center, to learn about the business of a sports organization. The program will be housed within the NBA team, the NHL team, or SEG.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  4    Annual lectures/Speaking engagements: SEG will collaborate with local Salt Lake City high schools and middle schools for opportunities for members of the NHL team (i.e. players, coaches or staff), the NBA team (i.e. players, coaches or staff) or SEG personnel to speak to classes or student groups about the sports industry. SEG will conduct at least four (4) of these in person outreach events per year to such schools.  Youth programming: SEG will continue promoting the creation, development, and growth of youth programming for both basketball and hockey in Salt Lake City, SEG will invest $2,000,000 providing multi-faceted support to youth athletics in Salt Lake City.  Free and subsidized tickets: SEG shall ensure that the NHL team and the NBA team will each offer free or subsidized tickets to various home games each season to Salt Lake City-based community organizations, with the goal of encouraging Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families in Salt Lake City to attend NHL and NBA home games. o Gathering Spaces: As part of the development of the district, SEG will design gathering/event/plaza spaces that will welcome members of the community to downtown Salt Lake City. These spaces will include: (1) an outdoor event space; (2) walkways connecting the public streets and rights of way to the district; and (3) landscape features and other elements consistent with a place of gathering. These spaces are intended to be operated and maintained such that they are inclusive and welcoming spaces for individuals and families.  The Gathering Spaces will be owned, operated and managed by SEG. The rules and regulations for the gathering spaces will include a statement affirming SEG’s support of non-discriminatory behavior on the basis of race, creed, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, age, or physical or mental ability.  SEG and the City will identify, on an annual basis, two mutually acceptable periods of three days each, between May 1 and September 15, that the City or a community organization designated by the City and approved by SEG can use one or more of the gathering spaces free of cost for festivals and events.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  5   o Japantown: As part of the development of the District, SEG will coordinate with the City on its efforts to facilitate the recognition, revitalization, and/or redevelopment of the Japantown community, located at 100 South and 300 West. SEG will meet, at a minimum, twice a year for the first 36 months with members designated by the Japanese Church of Christ and the Buddhist Temple, about SEG’s progress and planning efforts and to receive input from the Japantown representatives about the development of the revitalization and redevelopment of Japantown. Additionally, SEG will seek to incorporate the following into the District development:  Activate the north side of 100 South in Japantown, including consideration of street facing activated spaces and minimizing the number of truck loading and unloading areas along 100 S and facing Japantown.  Create a pedestrian connection between the interior of the District and Japantown including a spatial buffer between the District development and the Japanese Church of Christ.  Use commercially reasonable efforts to incorporate Japanese architectural or landscaping elements in the 100 South ground level facades facing Japantown.  Work with the Japanese American community to develop historical markers that relate to Japantown’s history, with content approved by the local Japanese American community. SEG will approve content and location of any historical markers on SEG owned and controlled property. All historic markers will be installed and fabricated by SEG using funds from the Public Benefits Account.  The City agrees to spend not less than $5,000,000 from the Public Benefits Account for the revitalization and redevelopment of Japantown. o Public Safety: SEG will provide a space within the District for use by security personnel and Salt Lake City Police Department officers, including for the processing and holding of arrestees. o Public Art: The City will spend a minimum of $5,000,000 from the Public Benefits Account towards the design, fabrication, installation, and maintenance of various pieces of public art, including iconic art, in the District. The public art will be procured through a mutually agreed upon process between the City’s Arts Council and SEG. The procurement process will include a process for notifying and engaging with local artists to compete for the opportunity to create public art.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  6    Transparency and Reporting: o SEG will appoint a liaison to the City to be the point person to report on SEG’s use of the Revitalization Sales Tax, progress on the construction of the District, and implementation of the Public Benefits. o SEG (or its liaison), will attend at least one City Council meeting per year to provide a briefing and update on the District. o SEG’s liaison will also provide reports summarizing the projects being constructed, an accounting of the Revitalization Sales Tax received, a summary of the ticket fee, and the status on the construction schedule of the District. o SEG will provide an annual report to the City on the status of construction and design of the Gathering Spaces, the status of the workforce development and community support initiatives, and the number of public outreach events conducted by SEG for the community support initiatives.  Non-relocation provision: Should the agreement with the County be reached regarding the County Lease as noted below and other conditions be met, both the NBA and NHL will play their home games at Delta Center during the term of the Participation Agreement. If either team ceases to play its home games at Delta Center, the City has a variety of remedies, including specific performance or payment of damages.  County Lease: SEG agrees that they will negotiate and endeavor to execute a lease with the County for County-owned property necessary for the District development on or before July 1, 2025. Execution of the lease with the County is a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the Agreement.   ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR  7   NEXT STEPS: The City Council may schedule another discussion and potential action on the Participation Agreement and Project Area on July 9, 2024. If the City Council takes action to endorse the Project Area and Participation Agreement, the Act lays out the following next steps: 1. City staff will take all necessary steps to provide notice to the Revitalization Zone Committee of the City Council’s endorsement of the Project Area and Participation Agreement. 2. Within 30 days of the Revitalization Zone Committee’s receipt of the City’s notice, they will review the Project Area and Participation Agreement and, in a public meeting, vote to either approve or reject the Project Area and Participation Agreement. a. If the Revitalization Zone Committee rejects the Project Area or Participation Agreement, they will adopt findings explaining the rejection, and the City and SEG will have an opportunity to further negotiate or amend the Project Area and Participation Agreement. b. If the Revitalization Zone Committee approves the Project Area and Participation Agreement, they will provide notice to the City Council of such approval. 3. Once the Revitalization Zone Committee approves the Project Area and Participation Agreement, the City Council may, in a public meeting, give final approval to the Project Area and Participation Agreement. 4. After giving final approval, the City Council may vote in a public meeting to impose the Revitalization Sales Tax.   Salt Lake City Council June 11, 2024 UTAH JAZZ 1REIMAGINING DOWNTOWN SLC DELTA CENTER SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT CULTURE/CONVENTION CONVENTION CENTER ABRAVANEL HALL UMOCA SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE JAPANESE CHURCH OF CHRIST JAPANTOWN STREET GUIDING PRINCIPLES •Walkability •Safety •Sustainability •Economic Development •Suitable Parking •Restoring Connectivity & Flow •Cohesive Transportation Planning •Community Partnership •Arts, Cultural, & Community Gathering Spaces TEARING DOWN WALLS, NOT BUILDING NEW ONES Restoring connectivity and flow connecting the east and west sides of downtown while ensuring no new walls are inadvertently built. Nihon Matsuri / Japantown Handout Front of Handout: Revitalization of Japantown What Does S.B. 272 Do? • Allows the City to designate up to 100 acres as a “Capital City Revitalization Zone” after a qualified applicant (Smith Entertainment Group - SEG) submits an application and the Council and Revitalization Committee approves a participation agreement. • The zone is required to be around a “currently existing qualified stadium.” (In this case, the Delta Center). • Allows the City to enact a 0.5% sales tax increase City-wide, with the requirement that all funds generated by that tax be spent inside the zone for a period of 30 years. • Allows a qualified applicant to use these funds within that area to reconstruct a stadium, service debt on bonds for a stadium, infrastructure, and/or “associated uses including entertainment and recreational uses…” • Creates a “Capital City Revitalization Zone Committee” made up of state leaders that will receive regular reports from the City and applicant on the plan, including how funds are spent. Note: SB 272 creates an entirely new process and City Attorneys are still working with State Attorneys and the private sector to refine a shared understanding of the required information and steps. Questions? Reach out to City.Council.Liaisons@slcgov.com. Sign up for email updates about Japantown at tinyURL.com/JapantownUpdates. Back of Handout: What is the City’s Role in this Process? City Council: Consider adopting a participation agreement • After a qualified applicant (SEG) submits an application to the City, the City’s Administration negotiates a "participation agreement" based on that application. • SB 272 has a deadline of September 1 for this step, although it may be sooner. City Council: Consider approving a sales tax increase • As a part of the plan above, the participation agreement may identify the tool of increased sales tax revenue to fund the proposed project. • SB 272 has a deadline of December 31 for this step, although it may be sooner, and may be tied to the adoption of the participation agreement. City Attorneys are still working through this. Planning Commission and City Council: Rezoning to facilitate development Nihon Matsuri / Japantown Handout • The City is required to process any zoning adjustments to accommodate the development by September 1. Questions? Reach out to City.Council.Liaisons@slcgov.com. Sign up for email updates about Japantown at tinyURL.com/JapantownUpdates. Item F1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Lehua Weaver DATE:July 2, 2024 RE:Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A Water Infrastructure Improvements – Public and Private Lead Service Lines MOTION 1 Adopt I move that the Council adopt the resolution for the next round of Public Utilities Bonds, and refer to the consent agenda to set the date for a hearing on August 13, 2024. MOTION 2 Not Adopt I move that the Council not adopt the resolution. Item Schedule: Written Briefing: June 11, 2024 Unfinished Business: July 2, 2024 Public Hearing: August 13, 2024 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Lehua Weaver DATE: June 11, 2024 RE:Written Briefing: Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A Water Infrastructure Improvements – Public and Private Lead Service Lines ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Department of Public Utilities is proposing to obtain funding through the State in order to perform private and public lead service line identification and replacement. The funding will be treated similarly to the issuance of bonds in terms of repayment and debt calculation, however the State is officially the “purchaser” and a portion of the bonds may be forgiven. The project includes replacement of lead or galvanized lines for some private customers who would not otherwise be able to afford the required work. The bond terms include two favorable components: 1. The total “bonds” issued are for $39,525,000, however $19,350,000 will be treated more as a grant and forgiven through the State’s Revolving Loan Fund for work performed in certain census tracts, to ensure affordability of the required replacements. 2. Rather than a conventional interest rate, the State will charge a 1.5% “assessment” – this lower rate was established to keep costs as low as possible for City water customers. A higher interest rate could have resulted in a higher increase to water rates to pay the higher debt service (repayment). BACKGROUND INFORMATION •Project information: o The Federal funds were set aside to assist with meeting regulatory requirements, specifically with lead service line identification and replacement. o Water mains may also be replaced as needed. Item Schedule: Written Briefing: June 11, 2024 Unfinished Business: July 2, 2024 Public Hearing: August 13, 2024 Page | 2 o According to Public Utilities, ▪“The service line replacement will be prioritized based on: 1) Known lead service lines or galvanized lines requiring replacement 2) Environmental Justice 3) Addressing vulnerable populations to lead exposure 4) Sample results and customer participation.” ▪The location of needed replacements was “obtained from our inventory work, which includes extensive City Historical records review, home inspections, sampling and customer surveys and public outreach.” •Financial info: o The Bonds are not typical revenue bonds, because of the portion that will be forgiven and because the State is officially the “purchaser” of the bonds. o The 1.5% assessment (in lieu of an interest rate) is set based on the State’s cost to administer the loan. o The amount of the loan that is “forgivable” will be determined based on the work that can be performed in certain census tracts. o The current paperwork indicates that Public Utilities would need to set aside 5% of the water rate revenue annually, but staff understands from Bond Counsel that this requirement will be waived. Instead, Public Utilities staff explained that a “debt service reserve account in the amount of $745,625 will be established in accordance with the terms of the official paperwork (Section 3.3 of the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture). Annual deposits of $74.562.50 will be made into the account until the reserve requirement of $745,625 is met. This account is to be used if insufficient funds are available in the Bond Service account. •Schedule: On July 2nd, the Council will consider adopting a “parameters resolution” and set the date for a required hearing on August 13th. TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 21, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor J1ULove Jill Love (May 23, 202416:21 MDT) LAURA BRIEFER, DIRECTOR Department of Public Utilities CITY COUNCIL TRANSM ITTAL Date Received: 05/23/2024 Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 05/23/2024 SUBJECT: Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A STAFF CONTACT: Lisa M. Tarufelli, Finance Administrator, 801-483-6755 Iisa.tarufel Ii@slcgov.com Laura Briefer, Director, 801-483-6741 laura.briefer(ci),slcgov.com Teresa Gray, Water Quality and Treatment Administrator, 801-483-6744 teresa.gray@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing/Discussion RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider adopting a Bond Parameters Resolution for the issuance and sale of up to $39,525,000 principal amount of Salt Lake City Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A. This includes a recommendation to 1) brief the Council on June 11, 2024 in anticipation of adopting a Bond Parameters Resolution for the aforementioned bond issue; 2) adopt a Bond Parameters Resolution on July 2, 2024 approving the issuance of up to $39,525,000 principal amount of Salt Lake City Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A and give authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and provisions of and confirm the issuance of the Bond within certain parameters set forth in the attached Bond Parameters Resolution; and 3) hold a public hearing on August 13, 2024. BUDGET IMPACT: None. The FY25 budget anticipated the bond issuance (SRF Loan Proceeds). No budget opening will be required. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In accordance with provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, the City is required to hold a public a hearing to receive input from the public for all bond issues with respect to: a) the issuance of the Series 2024A revenue bonds and b) the potential economic impact that the water infrastructure improvements will have on the private sector. The financing team is requesting that the City Council approve the Bond Parameters Resolution on July 2, 2024 setting Tuesday, August 13, 2024 as the date to hold the public hearing. A Notice of Public Hearing is required to be published once at least 14 days before the public hearing. The publication of that notice is scheduled for July 3, 2024. FROM:Laura Briefer, Public Utilities Director The Bond Parameters Resolution for the above-referenced bond issue contemplates the issuance of up to a $39,525,000 principal amount bond bearing a hardship grant assessment fee in lieu of interest not to exceed 1.5% per annum with a bond period not to exceed 39 years. Public Utilities received a Federal SRF Loan Authorization through the State Drinking Water Board for the planning and construction of lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements. The loan will be secured by a non-voted Water Revenue Bond. The authorized loan is up to $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000, for up to 39 years at 1.5% hardship grant assessment fee in lieu of interest. Public Utilities is implementing a 5-year approach for planning and construction associated with a Lead Service Line Replacement Program (Program). This Program is being conducted to comply with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SOWA) and its revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule. Information gathered through the planning phases of the project will inform the subsequent construction required for lead service removals. Construction will include removal and replacement of both public services and private services. Public Utilities presented information to the City Council about the Lead and Copper Rule changes and our anticipated approach to comply with the changes in January 2023. Draft copies of the Bond Parameters Resolution, Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, LSL Signed Authorization Letter from the Drinking Water Board, draft amortization schedule, and preliminary calendar of events are included for your review. These documents are subject to change. Attachments: Bond Parameters Resolution Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture SLC LSL Signed Authorization Letter Draft Loan Amortization Schedule Preliminary Calendar of Events cc: Lisa Tarufelli, Public Utilities Finance Administrator Teresa Gray, Public Utilities Water Quality and Treatment Administrator Mark Kittrell, Salt Lake City Deputy Attorney Marina Scott 4871-4591-9676, v. 3 Gilmore Bell DRAFT 05/21/2024 Salt Lake City, Utah July 2, 2024 The City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), met in regular session at the regular meeting place of the Council in Salt Lake City, Utah, at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 2, 2024, with the following members present: Present: Victoria Petro Chair Chris Wharton Vice Chair Alejandro Puy Council Member Eva Lopez Chavez Council Member Darin Mano Council Member Dan Dugan Council Member Sarah Young Council Member There were also present: Erin Mendenhall Mayor Katherine N. Lewis City Attorney Absent: After the meeting had been duly called to order and after other matters not pertinent to this Resolution had been discussed, a Certificate of Compliance with Open Meeting Law with respect to this July 2, 2024 meeting was presented to the Council, a copy of which is attached hereto. The following resolution was then introduced in written form, was fully discussed, and pursuant to motion duly made by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , was adopted by the following vote: AYE: NAY: The resolution is as follows: 24871-4591-9676, v. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT MORE THAN $39,525,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2024A; FIXING THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BONDS, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF YEARS OVER WHICH THE BONDS MAY MATURE, THE MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE, IF ANY, OR ASSESSMENT FEE WHICH THE BONDS MAY BEAR, AND THE MAXIMUM DISCOUNT FROM PAR AT WHICH THE BONDS MAY BE SOLD; PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED; PROVIDING FOR THE RUNNING OF A CONTEST PERIOD; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY THE CITY OF A SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO THE CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS RESOLUTION; AND RELATED MATTERS. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Bond Act”), Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), is authorized to issue public utilities revenue bonds (to be issued in one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the City) payable from the net revenues of its existing water, sewer, storm drain and street lighting systems (collectively, the “System”) for the municipal purposes set forth therein; and WHEREAS, subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City Council of the City (the “Council”) desires to authorize the issuance of the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A (the “Series 2024A Bonds”) to (a) finance water improvements to the System, including the replacement of water lines (collectively, the “Project”) and (b) pay costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, pursuant to this Resolution, the Bond Act, a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (formerly known as U.S. Bank National Association), as trustee (the “Trustee”), and a Supplemental Indenture to be entered into between the City and the Trustee (the “Supplemental Indenture” and collectively with the Master Indenture, the “Indenture”), in substantially the form presented to the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted and which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Bond Act provides that prior to issuing bonds, an issuing entity must (a) give notice of its intent to issue such bonds and (b) hold a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to (i) the issuance of the bonds and (ii) the potential economic impact that the improvement, facility or property for which the bonds pay all or part of the cost will have on the private sector; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to call a public hearing for this purpose and to publish a notice of such hearing with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds; and 34871-4591-9676, v. 3 WHEREAS, the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board (the “Drinking Water Board”) has offered to purchase the Series 2024A Bonds; and WHEREAS, in order to allow the City, in consultation with the City’s Municipal Advisor, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (the “Municipal Advisor”) flexibility in setting the pricing date and final terms of the Series 2024A Bonds, the Council desires to grant to (a) the (i) Mayor of the City; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Mayor and the Mayor’s Chief of Staff, the City Treasurer; or (iv) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff and the City Treasurer, the Deputy Treasurer of the City and (b) (i) the Chair of the Council; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Chair of the Council, the Vice Chair of the Council; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Chair and Vice Chair of the Council, any other member of the Council (collectively, the “Designated Officers”), the authority to approve the final interest rates, if any, assessment fees, principal amounts, terms, maturities, redemption or other features, and purchase price at which the Series 2024A Bonds shall be sold and to make any changes with respect thereto from those terms which were before the Council at the time of adoption of this Resolution, provided such terms do not exceed the parameters set forth for such terms in this Resolution (the “Parameters”); NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. For the purpose of financing the Project and paying costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, the Council hereby authorizes the issuance of the City’s Series 2024A Bonds which shall be designated “Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A” (to be issued from time to time as one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the City) in the initial aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $39,525,000. The Series 2024A Bonds shall mature in not more than thirty-nine (39) years from their date or dates, shall be sold at a price not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total principal amount thereof with the understanding that the Drinking Water Board has agreed to forgive $19,350,000 in principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds such that the net principal repayment amount shall be $20,175,000. The Series 2024A Bonds shall not bear interest but shall bear an annual Hardship Grant Assessment Fee instead of interest at a rate not to exceed one and one-half percent (1.5%) per annum, and may be non-callable or subject to redemption, all as shall be approved by the Designated Officers in consultation with the City’s Municipal Advisor, all within the Parameters set forth herein. Section 2. The Supplemental Indenture in substantially the form presented at this meeting and attached hereto as Exhibits B is hereby authorized, approved, and confirmed. The Mayor or the Mayor’s Chief of Staff as the Mayor’s designee (collectively referred to herein as the “Mayor”) are hereby authorized to execute and deliver and the City Recorder or Deputy City Recorder (the “City Recorder”) to attest or countersign, the Supplemental Indenture, in substantially the forms and with substantially the content as the form presented at this meeting for and on behalf of the City, with final terms as may be established by the Designated Officers, in consultation with the Municipal Advisor, within the Parameters set forth herein, and with such alterations, changes or additions as may be necessary or as may be authorized by Section 4 hereof. The Designated Officers are each hereby authorized to specify and agree as to the final 44871-4591-9676, v. 3 principal amounts, terms, discounts, maturities, interest rates, assessment fees, redemption and other features, and purchase price with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds for and on behalf of the City, provided that such terms are within the Parameters set by this Resolution. Section 3. The appropriate officials of the City are authorized to make any alterations, changes, deletions or additions to the Indenture, the Series 2024A Bonds, or any other document herein authorized and approved which may be necessary to conform the same to the final terms of the Series 2024A Bonds (within the Parameters set by this Resolution), to correct errors or omissions therein, to complete the same, to remove ambiguities therefrom, or to conform the same to other provisions of said instruments, to the provisions of this Resolution or any resolution adopted by the Council or the provisions of the laws of the State of Utah or the United States. The execution thereof by the Mayor on behalf of the City shall conclusively establish such necessity, appropriateness, and approval with respect to all such additions, modifications, deletions, and changes incorporated therein. Section 4. The form, terms, and provisions of the Series 2024A Bonds and the provisions for the signatures, authentication, payment, registration, transfer, exchange, redemption, and number shall be as set forth in the Indenture. The Mayor and City Recorder are hereby authorized and directed to execute and seal the Series 2024A Bonds and to deliver said Series 2024A Bonds to the Trustee for authentication. The signatures of the Mayor and the City Recorder may be by facsimile or manual execution. Section 5. The appropriate officials of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Trustee the written order of the City for authentication and delivery of the Series 2024A Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. Section 6. Upon their issuance, the Series 2024A Bonds will constitute special limited obligations of the City payable solely from and to the extent of the sources set forth in the Series 2024A Bonds and the Indenture. No provision of this Resolution, the Indenture, the Series 2024A Bonds, or any other instrument, shall be construed as creating a general obligation of the City, or of creating a general obligation of the State of Utah or any political subdivision thereof, or as incurring or creating a charge upon the general credit of the City or its taxing powers. Section 7. The appropriate officials of the City, and each of them, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver for and on behalf of the City any or all additional certificates, documents and other papers (including, without limitation, any reserve instrument guaranty agreements permitted by the Indenture) and to perform all other acts they may deem necessary or appropriate in order to implement and carry out the matters authorized in this Resolution and the documents authorized and approved herein. Section 8. Pursuant to Section 11-14-318 of the Bond Act, the City shall hold a public hearing on August 13, 2024, to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and (b) the potential economic impact that the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds will have on the private sector. 54871-4591-9676, v. 3 The date for such public hearing shall not be less than fourteen (14) days after notice of the public hearing is posted as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102 (i) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (ii) on the City’s official website, and (iii) in a public location within the City that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the City. The City Recorder shall cause a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits hereto) to be kept on file in the office of the City Recorder, for public examination during the regular business hours of the City until at least thirty (30) days from and after the initial posting thereof. The City directs its officers and staff to post a “Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued” in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Bond Act”), that on July 2, 2024, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized the issuance of the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A (the “Series 2024A Bonds”) (to be issued in one or more series and with such other name, series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the City) and called a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and (b) any potential economic impact that the Project described herein to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds may have on the private sector. PURPOSE, TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING The City shall hold a public hearing on August 13, 2024, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. at 451 South State Street, Room 315, Salt Lake City, Utah. The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and (b) any potential economic impact that the project to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds may have on the private sector. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate. Members of the public may respond in writing at the address of the City or at the public hearing. All feedback will be forwarded to the Utah Division of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Board. PURPOSE FOR ISSUING THE SERIES 2024A BONDS The Series 2024A Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing water improvements, including the replacement of water lines, to the City’s water, sewer, storm drain and street lighting systems (collectively, the “System”) and paying costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. REVENUES TO BE PLEDGED The Series 2024A Bonds are special limited obligations of the City payable from the revenues of the System (the “Revenues”). PARAMETERS OF THE SERIES 2024A BONDS The City intends to issue the Series 2024A Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not more than Thirty-Nine Million Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($39,525,000), to mature in not more than thirty-nine (39) years from their date or dates, shall be sold at a price not 64871-4591-9676, v. 3 less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total principal amount thereof with the understanding that the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board as the purchaser of the Series 2024 Bonds has agreed to forgive $19,350,000 in principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds such that the net principal repayment amount shall be $20,175,000. The Series 2024A Bonds shall not bear interest but shall bear an annual Hardship Grant Assessment Fee instead of interest at a rate not to exceed one and one-half percent (1.5%) per annum. The Series 2024A Bonds are to be issued and sold by the City pursuant to the Resolution, including as part of said Resolution, a Master Trust Indenture (the “Master Indenture”) and a Supplemental Indenture of Trust (the “Supplemental Indenture” and collectively, the “Indenture”) which Indenture was before the Council in substantially final form at the time of the adoption of the Resolution and said Supplemental Indenture is to be executed by the City in such form and with such changes thereto as shall be approved by the City; provided that the principal amount, interest rate or rates, maturity, and discount of the Series 2024A Bonds will not exceed the maximums set forth above. OUTSTANDING BONDS SECURED BY REVENUES Other than the proposed Series 2024A Bonds, the City currently has $564,387,999 of bonds outstanding (the “Outstanding Bonds”) secured by the Revenues (as more fully described in the Indenture). OTHER OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE CITY Additional information regarding the City’s Outstanding Bonds may be found in the City’s financial report (the “Financial Report”) at: https://reporting.auditor.utah.gov/searchreports/s. For additional information, including any information more recent than as of the date of the Financial Report, please contact Marina Scott, City Treasurer, at (801) 535-6565. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST Based on the City’s current plan of finance the estimated cost of the Series 2024A Bonds to be issued under the Bond Act if held until maturity is $27,592,515. A copy of the Resolution and the Indenture are on file in the office of the Salt Lake City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, or, in the event such office is closed for any reason, at 349 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, Utah, where they may be examined during regular business hours of the City Recorder from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of publication of this notice. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice is provided by law during which any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of the Resolution, the Indenture (only as it pertains to the Series 2024A Bonds), or the Series 2024A Bonds, or any provision made for the security and payment of the Series 2024A Bonds, and that after such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality, or legality thereof for any cause whatsoever. DATED this July 2, 2024. 74871-4591-9676, v. 3 /s/ Cindy Lou Trishman City Recorder ********** Section 9. The City hereby reserves the right to opt not to issue the Series 2024A Bonds for any reason, including without limitation, consideration of the opinions expressed at the public hearing. Section 10. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its approval and adoption. Section 11. Upon the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, this Resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until the principal of, premium, if any, and Hardship Assessment Fee on the Series 2024A Bonds are deemed to have been duly discharged in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Indenture. 84871-4591-9676, v. 3 ADOPTED this July 2, 2024. Chair ( S E A L ) Attest and Countersign: City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 94871-4591-9676, v. 3 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or disapproval on July 2, 2024. By: Chair MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this July 2, 2024. By: Mayor 104871-4591-9676, v. 3 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly appointed and qualified City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify according to the records of the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) in my official possession that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct excerpt of the minutes of the meeting of the City Council held on July 2, 2024, including a resolution (the “Resolution”) adopted at said meeting as said minutes and Resolution are officially of record in my possession. I further certify that the Resolution, with all exhibits attached, was deposited in my office on July 2, 2024, and pursuant to the Resolution, a Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to Be Issued will be posted no less than fourteen (14) days before the public hearing date as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102: (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) in a public location within the City that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my signature and impressed hereon the official seal of said City, this July 2, 2024. (SEAL) By: City Recorder A-14871-4591-9676, v. 3 EXHIBIT A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the July 2, 2024, public meeting held by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) as follows: (a) By causing a Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be posted at the principal offices of the City at least twenty four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting; and (b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and (c) By causing a copy of such notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1 to be posted on the City’s official website at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. In addition, the Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council (attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be posted at least annually (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) in a public location within the City that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this July 2, 2024. (SEAL) By: City Recorder Attachments: SCHEDULE 1 -- NOTICE OF MEETING SCHEDULE 2 -- ANNUAL MEETING SCHEDULE B-14871-4591-9676, v. 3 EXHIBIT B INDENTURE State of Utah SPENCERJ. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieulenant Governor Department of Environmental Quality Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER Nathan Lunstad Director Drinking Water Board Kristi Bell, Chair Eric Franson, P.E, Vice-Chair Dawn Ramsey Justin Maughan Corinna Harris Jeff Coombs Shazelle Terry Blake Tullis, PhD. Kimberly D. Shelley Nathan Lunstad Executive Secretary April 10, 2024 Laura Briefer Salt Lake City Water System 1530 S. West Temple Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 Laura.briefer@slcgov.com Subject:Federal SRF Loan Authorization and Procedures for Committal of Funds; Salt Lake City Water System, System #18026, Loan #3F2028 Dear Laura Briefer: On February 29, 2024, the Drinking Water Board (hereinafter called the "Board") authorized a construction loan of up to $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness, for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000 for up to 39 years at 1.5% hardship grant assessment fee in lieu of interest, to Salt Lake City Water System (hereinafter called the "Recipient") for the planning and construction of lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements where large quantities of lead are present (hereinafter called the "Project"). The loan from the Board will be secured by General Obligation bond(s), Non-voted Water Revenue bond(s), or a combination thereof; issued by the Recipient as incremental disbursement bond(s) (hereinafter referred to as Bonds) disbursed on a monthly or quarterly basis. The Board has determined the retirement period for the Bonds to be no more than thirty-nine (39) years, with the assessment fee payable on the unpaid principal from the date of each advance of loan funds. The annual assessment fee is 1.5%. The Board will require annual principal payments on the Bonds, plus assessments, totaling approximately $687,000. Enclosed is the proposed bond repayment schedule. If a revenue bond is used, a debt service reserve fund equal to this annual amount must be established by no more than ten equal annual deposits. The authorized financial assistance will be deposited incrementally into the escrow account mentioned in item 2 along with other funds after the bonding requirements for the loan are completed and the principal forgiveness agreement is signed and fully executed. Special Conditions 195 North 1950 West• Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Telephone (801) 536-4200 • Fax (801) 536-4211 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on I00% recycled paper Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 2 This financial assistance was authorized subject to the availability of funds. The assistance represented by this authorization will be funded, in whole or in part, from the proceeds of a federal DWSRF Capitalization Grant (Section 1452 SOWA) to the State of Utah. Under the SRF Capitalization Grant Program, federal funds are to be made available to the State by way of authorized draws on a letter of credit over the construction period of the Project. Therefore, this authorization is expressly subject to the continued availability of federal funds through the SRF Capitalization Grant and the letter of credit related thereto. Neither the Board nor the State of Utah shall be bound by this authorization or by any obligation to provide further loan funds to or purchase any bonds from the Recipient if the SRF Capitalization Grant funds to which this authorization relates are not awarded or if payments under the letter of credit are withheld for any reason. As a condition of this authorization, the Board will require the Recipient to provide a schedule of estimated engineering and construction time for the Project within ninety (90) days of the date of this letter. If the Project has not progressed sufficiently for the Recipient to issue the Bond within twelve months of the date of authorization, authorized funding may be withdrawn. As a condition of this loan, the Board will require the Recipient to establish a capital facilities replacement reserve account. Deposits to that account shall be made at least annually in the amount of five percent (5%) of the Recipient's annual drinking water system budget, including depreciation, and must continue until the Bonds are redeemed. Failure to maintain the reserve account will constitute a technical default on the Bonds and may result in penalties being assessed. The Bonds may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time in minimum amounts of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof, with the prepayments applied against the Bond principal in inverse order of maturities. In addition, if any Bond proceeds remain after the Project is completed, those remaining proceeds shall be used to redeem Bond principal in inverse order of maturities. The Bond documents must contain the following provisions: i]The Bonds will initially be in the form of a single, fully-registered bond in the amount of $20,175,000 with provisions for incremental advances quarterly, based on a schedule that coincides with the rate at which engineering/construction related costs are expected to be incurred for the Project. However, provisions shall be made which would allow the Bonds to be exchanged for separate serial bonds in minimum denominations of $1,000. ii]If revenue bonds are used the Bonds must be secured by a pledge by the Recipient of 100% of the net revenue produced by the Recipient's water system, and the Recipient will be required to warrant and demonstrate that those net revenues equal or exceed 125% of the total annual debt service requirements on the Bonds and any other obligations secured by a pledge of those revenues. iii]If interest is payable on the Bonds, that interest must be tax-exempt, and delivery of the Bonds must be accompanied by an opinion of recognized bond counsel that the interest is not subject to state or federal income taxes. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 3 iv]If a revenue bond is used, and if the Recipient has previously issued bonds or other obligations secured by a pledge of water system revenues, the Bonds to be purchased by the Board shall be issued on a parity with those prior bonds or obligations with respect to the revenue. If it is not possible for the Bonds to be issued on a parity basis, the Recipient shall contact Michael J. Grange immediately at (801) 674-2563. Based on the information presented to the Board, the following sources of funding will be available for the construction of the Project: Agency Share % of Total Drinking Water Board (Loan)$20,175,000 51% Drinking Water Board (Principal Forgiveness)$19,350,000 49% Local Contribution $0 0% Total Project Cost $39,525,000 100.0% For DWSRF-funded projects the Recipient must submit engineering drawings for any water main replacements or copies of approved waterline installation standards to the Drinking Water Board for review. If the Recipient chooses to use a contractor for any portion of the authorized project, the Recipient must advertise for bids for those portions of the Project, must open the bids, and must demonstrate to the Drinking Water Board that the bidding process complied with Utah bidding laws and that available sources of funding are adequate to cover the cost of the Project and the bond insurance costs. Prior to bond closing the Recipient must make arrangements for all authorized financial assistance proceeds and all other Project funds to be available for deposit into the escrow account described below at the time the Board delivers funds unless other acceptable arrangements have been previously made. The financial assistance is conditioned upon the availability of funds at the time of closing, satisfaction of the conditions specified in this letter, and adherence to the project schedule approved at that time. If the Project does not proceed according to the project schedule, the Board may withdraw project authorization, so that other projects ready to proceed can obtain necessary funding. The Board may consider extensions to the project schedule. Any extension requested must be fully justified. After the Project's construction bids have been opened and the below listed requirements have been met, and if the project remains substantially as approved, loan closing will proceed subject to funds available at that time. But, if substantial changes in the Project are required, they must be considered by the Board for committal of funds. As the Recipient you will need to complete the following items before the Board will purchase your Bonds: I.The State of Utah has appointed William L. Prater, Esq. as special legal counsel to the Board (the "Board's Attorney") and has assigned to him the responsibility of reviewing Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 4 all proceedings and documents relating to the sale of bonds to the Board. His telephone number is (801) 566-8882, email is bill@billprater.com, or mail to P.O. Box 71368, Salt Lake City, Utah 84171. The Recipient's bond counsel shall submit the following items to his office at the times indicated below. A copy of the transmittal letter for the items indicated below must also be sent to the Division of Drinking Water to document project progress. a.No later than one week prior to the meeting at which the Recipient intends to adopt its Resolution for the issuance of the Bonds, a complete copy of the Resolution shall be submitted for review. b.No later than two weeks after the adoption of the Resolution, the following items shall be submitted: 1)A true and complete photocopy of the Resolution as adopted, showing signatures of the appropriate officials of the Recipient on the Resolution and on the Notice of Meeting, Acknowledgment of Notice and Consent, Certificate of Publication, Open Meeting Certificate, and other similar documents relating to the Resolution. 2)A true and complete photocopy of the minutes, notices, resolutions, and other documents relating to the Bonds, showing signatures of the appropriate officials. 3)A complete copy of the proposed documents to be signed at Closing, including (but not necessarily limited to) General Certificate, Signature Identification and Non-Litigation Certificate, Receipt, Arbitrage Certificate (ifrequired), Recipient Attorney's Non-Litigation Certificate, Certificate of Clerk (or Recorder) as to contents of Bond Transcript File, Escrow Agreement, and the Bond Attorney's Opinion. 4)A copy of the water rate structure described in paragraph 3 below of this letter. 5)A copy of the proposed opinion letter of the Recipient's attorney described in paragraph 7 of this letter. The procedures for bond approval will be substantially the same as required by the Utah Local Government Bonding Act as it applies to cities and towns. The opinion of the bond attorney must accompany delivery of the Bonds to the Board before proceeds of the loan will be released. At or after the Closing, the Board's Attorney will bill the Recipient, and the Recipient must pay those legal fees. This is an eligible project expenditure. If the Recipient fails to close the loan after this authorization, it will nonetheless be by billed for the actions taken by the Board's Attorney prior to loan cancellation. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 5 2.Consistent with requirements of the law and the covenants of applicable bond resolutions, the actual payment of funds by the Board to the Recipient will not take place until the Board has assurance the funds will be used for Project costs and the Project will actually be completed. To assure this, all monies to be expended on the Proiect. including the Recipient's share shall be placed in an escrow account supervised by the Recipient and the Board, unless other acceptable arrangements have been made. In general, the Board will make incremental advances into the account on a monthly or quarterly basis. A copy of the proposed escrow agreement shall be submitted to the Board and the Board's Attorney for review. Disbursements from the escrow account will be reviewed and approved by the Division of Drinking Water. A Disbursement Request Form must be completed and submitted along with each request. Disbursement amounts must be authorized in writing by the Recipient and the State prior to any funds being released from the escrow account. Please refer to the reimbursement instruction sheet. 3.At the time of the adoption of the bond resolution, the Recipient shall have passed an ordinance or resolution establishing reasonable water use rates and collection enforcement remedies, taking into account many factors including the need to have sufficient revenue income for all outstanding water system debts, operation and maintenance costs, and any reserve funds. It will then be necessary to implement effective collection procedures. A copy of the rate ordinance and collection enforcement procedures shall be submitted to the Board and the Board's Attorney for review. 4.The Recipient's contract with its engineer shall include the cost of developing the plans and specifications and the construction inspection of the Project. The contract shall be submitted to the Division of Drinking Water for review. (This requirement is to assure the Board that adequate and appropriate arrangements are made for completing and inspecting the project within the guidelines set by the Board.) 5.The project engineer shall submit, in accordance with R309-500, plans and specifications, bidding documents, and general conditions to the Division of Drinking Water for review and Plan Approval prior to soliciting bids on the Project. The engineer shall submit project documents via ddwpnf@utah.gov per https://deq. utah.govldrinking-water/general-plan- approval-process for the expeditious assignment and review of the plans and specifications. Any changes to approved plans and specifications prior to finalizing the Recipient Agreement must be reviewed and approved by the Division of Drinking Water. These funds cannot be disbursed until after the bid opening has occurred and a copy of the bid tabulation has been reviewed by the Division to assure that sufficient funds are authorized to complete the Project. If substantial changes in the Project are required, they must be considered by the Board for committal of additional funds. The following shall be included in the specifications: a.The Recipient shall require contractors hired to perform work on their project to pay prevailing wage rates according to Davis-Bacon labor wage requirements. See attached Reference Page for document location. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 6 b.The Recipient shall comply with the Build America Buy America Act requirements. See attached Reference Page for document location. 6.Rights-of-way and easements for construction, and operation and maintenance of the Project shall be acquired. The Recipient, through its engineer, shall furnish its attorney a right-of-way map showing the location of all sources, buildings, structures, pipelines, and other pertinent facilities not only in the Project but also for the entire water system. The engineer and presiding officer of the Recipient will sign this map and a copy provided to the Recipient's attorney as a basis for the certification described below. 7.The Recipient's attorney shall certify the following items in writing to the Board: a.The Recipient is a legal entity as of the date ofloan closing. b.The Recipient has valid legal title to the rights-of-way designated and shown on the rights-of-way map, including rights-of-way both for the project to be constructed and the remainder of the existing water system as of the date ofloan closing. c.The Recipient has established the ownership of water rights to any and all water used in the system and such rights are summarized with associated water right numbers. d.The bidding process and contract documents for the construction of the Project have the proper and legal format and are in compliance with the Utah Code Annotated 1953 (including, but not limited to Title 34, Chapter 30). e.After the completed and executed construction contract, along with the performance and payment bonds and evidence of necessary insurance, has been reviewed by the Recipient 's attorney, the Recipient 's attorney shall furnish to the Board his legal opinion that all of such items are legal and binding and in compliance with the Utah Code. As indicated earlier, a draft of this letter is to be submitted to the Board and the Board's Attorney two weeks after the adoption of the resolution. 8.If interest is payable on the Bonds, the Bonds must be accompanied by a legal opinion of recognized municipal bond counsel that interest on the bond obligations is exempt from federal income taxation. Unless otherwise covered, the opinion must also include a statement that the project to be constructed with the Bond proceeds is not for private activity and that the Recipient has complied with all the requirements of the Board with respect to the Utah Federal State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program (R309-705 of the Utah Administrative Code). 9.The Recipient must obtain and maintain continuously throughout the loan repayment period, a fidelity bond on the positions handling the Recipient's funds, in an amount at Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 7 least equal to the total amount of funds that will be on hand at any one time, exclusive of loan funds. This amount should be at least twice an annual payment or $1.374.000. This fidelity bond must be obtained and furnished to the Board prior to the loan closing date. The names of the insured on the position fidelity bond will be "Salt Lake City Water System and the State of Utah acting through the Drinking Water Board." 10.As a condition to the acceptance by the Board of a non-voted revenue bond, the issuer must: a.Publish notice and conduct a public hearing consistent with the requirements of the Utah Local Government Bonding Act, and b.Mail notices to System users in the Issuer's service area informing them of that public hearing. In addition to the time and location of the public hearing, the notices which are mailed to System users shall inform System users of the issuer's intent to issue a non-voted revenue bond to the Board, shall describe the face amount of the Bond, the rate of interest, the repayment schedule and shall describe the impact of the Project. User charge rates and connection fees shall be noted in that notice. That notice shall state that System users may respond to the Issuer in writing or in the public hearing. A copy of all written responses and a certified record of a public hearing shall be forwarded to the Board. If the Board feels that there is significant opposition to the proposed project, or if required by the Utah Local Government Bonding Act, it may be necessary for the Issuer to hold a bond election before the Board's funds will be made available. 11.As a condition of this loan, the Board will require the Recipient to complete a Water Conservation Plan. If your system has less than 500 connections, the plan must be submitted to the Division of Drinking Water prior to loan closing. If your system has more than 500 connections, the plan must be submitted to the Division of Water Resources for review and approval, and the approved plan must be adopted (completing the Certification of Adoption) prior to loan closing. If the Recipient has already adopted such a plan, that plan and its certification of adoption may be submitted to the Division of Drinking Water for verification. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 8 12.In compliance with Utah Code Annotated 9-8-404 and 36 CFR 800.3(g), the project engineer shall submit a report to the Division of Drinking Water that demonstrates a reasonable and good faith effort was made to identify and gather information to etermine if cultural resources are present in the area of potential effects, including a Class III Survey. The report format shall meet SHPO State of Utah Archaeological Compliance Guidance. Cultural resource reporting guidance is outlined in the Utah SHPO Short Cultural Resources Inventory Report Form. See attached Reference page for document location. 13.The Recipient must agree to comply with the above Federal laws, executive orders, and government-wide policies that apply to the Project and complete the following: a.Ensure, to the fullest extent possible, that Disadvantaged Business Enterprise procurement requirements are achieved in all procurements for prime contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and others. For your information, refer to these forms for DBE utilization: DBE Contact Log for Bidders, Subcontractor Participation, Performance, and Utilization forms, Suggested Sources for Locating Certified MBE/WBE Contractors in Utah. See attached Reference page for document locations. Ensure that the "six affirmative steps" are taken to assure compliance with the State's "fair share goals" in all procurements. The Division will specify the required language, documents, and instructions. (1)Bid solicitations shall state that this is a federally funded project requiring compliance with the State's "fair share goals" and federal EEO regulations. See attached Reference Page for document location. (2)The "Special Conditions" or "Supplemental Conditions" in the bid documents shall contain the language and instructions specifying the MBE and WBE procurement requirements, provided by the Division. (3)The same bid documents shall also contain the federal EEO requirements. b.Report MBE/WBE utilization for construction services on "EPA Form 5700-52A." See attached Reference Page for document location. This is a requirement for projects that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold set by the Office of Management and Budget. Annual reports are due by October 30th of each year. c.Include the following certification in the bond resolution: "The Issuer agrees, in accepting the proceeds of the Series Bonds, to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations related to the Utah State Revolving Fund administered by the Drinking Water Board These requirements include, but are not limited to, Title XIV of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996, 0MB Circular A-133, the Utah Federal State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program (R309-705 of the Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 9 Utah Administrative Code), the Utah Municipal Bond Act, the Utah Money Management Act, the Utah Procurement Code and the State of Utah Legal Compliance Audit Guide." 14.The Recipient shall submit a cash drawdown schedule prepared and certified by their consulting engineer to be a schedule that coincides with the rate at which expected construction related costs are incurred by the project. 15.The Recipient must get a Unique Entity ID from SAM.gov. Once the entity record has been validated, submit a copy of the Unique Entity ID to the Division of Drinking Water. 16.The Recipient shall comply with the Single Audit Act requirements in accordance with 0MB Circular A-133. 17.The Recipient is required to comply with the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Signage requirements. See attached Reference Page for document location. 18.In compliance with Utah Code Annotated 73-10g-402, water systems applying for federal financial assistance for improvements to capital assets related to water infrastructure shall commit to adopt a capital asset management plan. The Asset Management Plan shall be submitted to the Division for review and approval prior to loan closing, unless preparing an Asset Management Plan is included as part of the project for which the Recipient has applied for financial assistance. In which case, the Asset Management Plan shall be submitted to the Division as soon as it is completed or prior to the entity submitting its final project reimbursement request. To facilitate the timely completion of the financial assistance requirements outlined in this letter, the Recipient and its attorney and engineer shall submit to the Division of Drinking Water all of the items required before loan closing no later than 30 days before the bond closing, and the Recipient's bond attorney shall submit to the Board's Attorney the items listed in subsection "b" of paragraph l on or before the due date specified. These requirements must be completed on or before March 1, 2025. If the Recipient fails to reasonably comply with the Project schedule, the Authorization may be withdrawn in accordance with R309-705-7. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 10 These requirements may not cover all the matters pertaining to the Project. We anticipate that specific questions on matters relating to your Project will arise, and we are confident that a cooperative effort can resolve any issues. If you have any questions concerning these requirements, please contact Andrea Thurlow at (385) 260-0337, Heather Pattee at (385) 515-1498 or me at (801) 674-2563. Sincerely, DRINKING WATER BOARD Michael J. Grange, P.E. Assistant Executive Secretary MJG/hp/at/lr Enclosures 1.Reference Page 2.Salt Lake City Water System Loan Repayment Schedule cc: William Prater, Esq., William L. Prater, LLC, PO Box 71368, SLC, UT 84171, bill@billprater.com Lisa Tarufelli, Salt Lake City Water System, lisa.tarufelli@slcgov.com Teresa Gray, Salt Lake City Water System, Teresa.Gray@slcgov.com Emma McGowan, Jacobs, emma.mcgowan@jacobs.com Bradley Patterson, Gilmore & Bell, bpatterson@gilmorebell.com Andrea Thurlow, Division of Drinking Water, athurlow@utah.gov Heather Pattee, Division of Drinking Water, hpattee@utah.gov Nagendra Dev, Division of Drinking Water, ndev@utah.gov DDWFinance Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 11 Reference Page *Davis-Bacon labor wage requirements - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking- water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DOW-2022-0005 38.pdf. *American Iron and Steel Provision - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF /DDW-2022-000536.pdf *Build America Buy America Act - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022-004136.pdf *Utah SHPO Short Cultural Resources Inventory Report form - https://documents.deg.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF /DDW-2020- 038201.pdf#page=53 *Disadvantaged Business Enterprise procurement requirements - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022- 000522.pdf *DBE Contact Log for Bidders - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF /DDW-2022-000526.pdf *Subcontractor Participation, Performance, and Utilization forms - https://documents.deg.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022- 000526.pdf *Suggested Sources for Locating Certified MBE/WBE Contractors in Utah - https://documents.deg.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022- 000532.pdf *Federal EEO regulations - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022-000530.pdf *" EPA Form 5700-52A" - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022-000524.pdf INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines Law Last Updated: March 2, 2023 . Office of Digital Strategy White House Office, EOP Meena Yi Abbey Pitzer The Bipartisan Infrastructure The CHIPS and Science Act The Inflation Reduction Act The American Rescue Plan Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 2 Guidelines for Logo Applications The purpose of this document is to provide general guidelines for signs displayed at project sites for projects funded under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act), the CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, the American Rescue Plan, and other Federally-funded projects as appropriate. The first part of this document pertains to signs for Federally- funded projects that are not installed in the highway right-of- way. For highway signage guidance that is MUTCD compliant please see pages 13 and 14. For all other signs please start here. This document provides information about the Investing In America logo mark as well as how logos, marks and seals of states, cities, and counties can be incorporated into signage. Logos of contractors are not permitted on the signage. When logos are included in signage, the placement should conform to these brand guidelines. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 3 Variations and Usage There is one approved mark associated with the Investing In America logo. To preserve the integrity of the Investing In America logo mark, make sure to apply them correctly. Altering, distorting, or recreating the 'marks' in any way weakens the power of the image and what it represents. Layout and design of signs and communication materials will vary, so care must be taken when applying the logo mark. Primary Logo Mark INVESTING IN AMERICA Colors The colors, graphics, and fonts used should conform to graphic standards. PMS7687 C COLOR ■Blue CMYK 83,48,0,48 RGB 22 / 68 / 132 HEX #164484 PMS ■Red 0, 100, 81, 0 255 / 0 / 49 #FF0031 PMS185 C White 2,2,0,3 242/ 244/ 248 #F2F4F8 Bright White Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 4 Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 5 Logos INVESTING IN AMERICA White background: logo in red and blue INVESTING IN AMERICA Gray background: logo in red and blue Blue background: logo in all white Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 6 Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 s I Investing In America General Guidelines for Logo Applications PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's lSln.[Insert Name of Law]C co <::t 12 fn.481n.""I 71n.3.Sln. t------7----.::C=------ 3, 5 In.7 in. 72 in. 3.Sin.INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 6 Sign Colors 1.The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law INVESTING IN . PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law INVESTING IN l"" AMERICA 0,t; White AMERICA 0 Gray Blue Red Border PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 7 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 . Sign Colors 2.The CHIPS and Science Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act INVESTING IN AMERICA 0, ..INVESTING IN AMERICA White Gray Blue Red Border 0. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 8 Sign Colors 3.The Inflation Reduction Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act INVESTING IN AMERICA INVESTING IN AMERICA White Gray PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act 0.. Blue Red Border PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 6:2 J......,......0 .INVESTING IN AMERICA 06:J............. -.c,c..-. 2 0 . Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 9 0 .0 2 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 ,,.. Sign Colors 4.The American Rescue Plan PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 .i . ,. EJ I, White Gray Blue Red Border INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 10 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] State, City, and County Logo Variations PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA Square or Circular State Logo: 7x7 in. INVESTING IN AMERICA Rectangular or Oval State Logo: not to exceed 17.5 x 7 in. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 11 .. PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA 3 Logo Samples PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA County/City Logo l i .,; '•\- State Logol ''ll2QT Circular City Logo 7 x 7 in. State rectangular logo should not exceed 17.5 x7 in. Rectangular State Logo: not to exceed 17.5 x 7 in. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 12 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's (Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA J29-T 2 Logo Samples PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA, Circular State Lo o: 7 x 7 in. Rectangular State Logo: not to exceed 17.5 x 7 in. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 13 Pictograph ----27.9 ------4_.J._a_1---J._4_J.._11_55 J 5.775 ------zs.9----------- -.i------'39.s----------1-4..J.12.ss---- 13'.56 3.37 19 68.88 40.25 ---------------'I ----------------96 ----------------------------M3.37 Rules for Highway Right of Way Signage 8 Feet i i Rules for Highway Right of Way Signage 6 Feet INVESTING IN AMERICA C") --l .l.O... s;f'-¼ State Agency Pictograph USDOT Pictograph lONiri C'1 5.6-->IJ-E--19.04---- --)IE---16.84--•loo-E4 5.16 4-L-7.7645.6 --------20.12 --------21.96-------4..J.._s.4---3.76 I I 3.76-9.76-lk----------52.48--------- a>k-9.76- 5.25l-3-JE--14.25-------27.73 14.25--- 3.76 3.76 12 >1 Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 14 II. ' PROJECT FUNDED BY THE Bipartisan Infrastructure Law j Gilmore Bell DRAFT 05/21/2024 TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AND U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee Dated as of [August] 1, 2024 $39,525,000 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2024A 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS.............................................................................................................2 Section 1.1 Definitions..............................................................................................................2 Section 1.2 Authority for Twelfth Supplemental Indenture......................................................4 ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION, TERMS AND ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2024A BONDS.......4 Section 2.1 Authorization of Bonds, Principal Amount, Designation and Series.....................4 Section 2.2 Finding and Purpose...............................................................................................4 Section 2.3 Advances of Proceeds.............................................................................................5 Section 2.4 Debt Forgiveness....................................................................................................5 Section 2.5 Denominations, Payments, Payment Date, and Hardship Grant Assessment ........5 Section 2.6 Delinquent Payment...............................................................................................7 Section 2.7 Exchange of State Bond .........................................................................................7 Section 2.8 Paying Agent..........................................................................................................7 Section 2.9 Optional Redemption; Redemption Price...............................................................7 Section 2.10 Execution of Series 2024A Bond...........................................................................8 Section 2.11 Delivery of Series 2024A Bonds............................................................................8 ARTICLE III APPLICATION OF SERIES 2024A BOND PROCEEDS AND OTHER MONEYS; ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF ACCOUNTS AND SUBACCOUNTS .................................................................................................8 Section 3.1 Application of Proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds..............................................8 Section 3.2 Series 2024A Project Account................................................................................8 Section 3.3 Establishment of Debt Service Reserve Subaccount..............................................8 Section 3.4 Renewal and Replacement Fund............................................................................9 Section 3.5 Establishment of Series 2024A Project Account....................................................9 Section 3.6 Establishment of Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount ....................................9 ARTICLE IV ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE CITY........9 Section 4.1 Additional Covenants and Representations with Respect to the Series 2024A Bonds ...................................................................................................................9 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS...................................................................................................9 Section 5.1 Confirmation of Sale of Series 2024A Bonds........................................................9 Section 5.2 System of Registration..........................................................................................10 Section 5.3 Article and Section Headings...............................................................................10 Section 5.4 Partial Invalidity...................................................................................................10 Section 5.5 Counterparts..........................................................................................................10 Section 5.6 Electronic Signatures............................................................................................10 Section 5.7 Effective Date.......................................................................................................10 Section 5.8 Confirmation of Master Indenture........................................................................10 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 5.9 Representation Regarding Ethical Standards for City Officers and Employees and Former City Officers and Employees..........................................................10 EXHIBIT A-1 (FORM OF STATE BOND) ........................................................................... A-1-1 EXHIBIT A-2 (FORM OF EXCHANGE BOND) .................................................................. A-2-1 EXHIBIT B COST OF ISSUANCE DISBURSEMENT REQUEST .........................................B-1 EXHIBIT C FORM OF REQUISITION .....................................................................................C-1 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE THIS TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE (the “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture”), dated as of [August] 1, 2024, between Salt Lake City, Utah, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah (the “City” or “Issuer”), and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association duly organized and qualified under the laws of the United States of America, authorized by law to accept and execute trusts and having an office in Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Trustee”): WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City has entered into a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, as amended and supplemented to the date hereof (the “Master Indenture” and, together with the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, the “Indenture”), with the Trustee; and WHEREAS, the City considers it necessary and desirable and for the benefit of the City and the users of the System (as defined in the Master Indenture) to issue revenue bonds pursuant to the Indenture and as hereinafter provided for the purpose of financing part of the costs of acquiring a project consisting of the acquisition, improvement or extension of water improvements, facilities and property that will be a part of the System pursuant to authority contained in the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended; and WHEREAS in order to (i) finance all or a portion of the costs of construction of improvements to its water system, including, but not limited to lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements and related improvements (collectively, the “Series 2024A Project”), and (ii) finance the costs of issuance of the Bonds herein authorized, the City has determined to issue its Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A in the aggregate principal amount of $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness, for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000 (the “Series 2024A Bonds”); and WHEREAS, the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board (the “Drinking Water Board”) has agreed to purchase the Series 2024A Bonds at par upon the terms and conditions herein set forth; and WHEREAS, the Series 2024A Bonds will be authorized, issued and secured under the Indenture on a parity with all other Bonds issued and outstanding from time to time thereunder; and WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of the Series 2024A Bonds and of this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture have in all respects been duly authorized and all things necessary to make the Series 2024A Bonds, when executed by the City and authenticated by the Trustee, the valid and binding legal obligations of the City and to make this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture a valid and binding agreement have been done; 24854-3464-3644, v. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THIS TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE WITNESSETH: For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and of the purchase of the Series 2024A Bonds by the Bondholders thereof from time to time, and of the acceptance by the Trustee of the trusts hereby created, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the City has executed and delivered this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, and by these presents does confirm the pledge provided for in the Master Indenture and to further secure the payment of the Series 2024A Bonds and all other Bonds now or hereafter Outstanding under the Indenture does hereby sell, assign, transfer, set over and pledge unto U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, its successors and trusts and its assigns forever, all right, title and interest of the City in and to (a) the proceeds of the sale of the Series 2024A Bonds, (b) the Revenues, (c) all moneys held by Trustee in funds and accounts established hereunder, including the investments, if any, thereof (except for any Rebate Fund), and (d) all other rights hereinafter granted for the future securing of such Series 2024A Bonds subject to the permitted applications thereof as provided in the Master Indenture. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME unto the Trustee and its successors and its assigns in trust forever; IN TRUST, NEVERTHELESS, FIRST, for the equal and ratable benefit and security of all present and future Bondholders and Security Instrument Issuers without preference, priority, or distinction as to security or otherwise (except as otherwise specifically provided), of any of the Bonds or Security Instrument Repayment Obligations over any of the others by reason of time of issuance, sale, delivery, maturity or expiration thereof or otherwise for any cause whatsoever; and SECOND, for the equal and proportionate benefit, security and protection of all Reserve Instrument Issuers without preference, priority, or distinction as to lien or otherwise (except as otherwise specifically provided) of any Reserve Instrument Provider over any other Reserve Instrument Provider by reason of time of issuance, delivery or expiration thereof or otherwise for any cause whatsoever. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions. (a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b) of this Section and as the same may be amended hereby, all defined terms contained in the Master Indenture when used in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Master Indenture. (b)As used in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, unless the context shall otherwise require, the following terms shall have the following meanings: “Advance” means an incremental advance to the City of the Series 2024A Bonds by the Drinking Water Board in accordance with this Supplemental Indenture. “Drinking Water Board” means the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board, or any successor thereof. 34854-3464-3644, v. 3 “Hardship Grant Assessment” means the hardship grant assessment fee to be charged in connection with the Series 2024A Bonds pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof. “Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date” means, with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds, each February 1, commencing February 1, 2025. “Issue Date” means, with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds, the original date of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. “Indenture” means the Master Indenture as amended and supplemented by this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and as from time to time hereafter amended and supplemented by Supplemental Indentures. “Master Indenture” means the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented, between the City and the Trustee, providing for the issuance of public utility revenue bonds. “Outstanding Parity Bonds” means, as of the date of execution and delivery of the Series 2024A Bonds, (i) the Taxable Water and Sewer Bonds, Series 2009; (ii) the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2010; (iii) the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2011; (iv) Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2012; (v) Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2017; (vi) Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2020; (vii) Public Utilities Revenue Bond (WIFIA Loan), Series 2020B; and (viii) Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2022. “Record Date” means the fifteenth day of the month next preceding any Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date. “Renewal and Replacement Fund Reserve Requirement” means an amount equal to $0. “Repayable Principal Amount” means the maximum principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds payable to the Registered Owner thereof calculated by reducing the purchase price of the Series 2024A Bonds by the debt forgiveness amounts as provided in Section 2.4 and Section 2.5 hereof. “Series 2024A Bonds” means the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A, issued pursuant to this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. “Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount” means the Series Subaccount in the Bond Service Account established in Section 3.5. “Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount” means the Subaccount established in the Debt Service Reserve Account for the Series 2024A Bonds. “Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement” means an amount equal to $745,625. 44854-3464-3644, v. 3 “Series 2024A Project” means improvements to the City’s water system including, but not limited to lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements and related improvements. “Series 2024A Project Account” means the Project Account in the Construction Fund established in Section 3.4. “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture” means this Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of [August] 1, 2024, between the City and the Trustee. The terms “hereby,” “hereof,” “hereto,” “herein,” “hereunder,” and any similar terms as used in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, refer to this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. Section 1.2 Authority for Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. This Twelfth Supplemental Indenture is executed pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Indenture. ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION, TERMS AND ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2024A BONDS Section 2.1 Authorization of Bonds, Principal Amount, Designation and Series. In order to provide sufficient funds, together with other available moneys of the City, if any, for the (a) financing of the Series 2024A Project and (b) paying all expenses properly incidental thereto and to the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and in accordance with and subject to the terms, conditions and limitations established in the Indenture, the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A are hereby authorized to be issued. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be limited to $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000 and shall be issued (i) if issued as a state bond, in the form set forth in Exhibit A-1 (the “State Bond”) and (ii) if issued as an exchange bond, in the form set forth in Exhibit A-2 (the “Exchange Bonds”) in fully registered form. The Series 2024A Bonds shall bear a Hardship Grant Assessment from their Issue Date at the rate of 1.50% per annum on the unpaid principal balance of the Series 2024A Bonds which shall be payable commencing February 1, 2025, until the Series 2024A Bonds are paid in full. If issued as Exchange Bonds, the Series 2024A Bonds shall be in the denomination of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The Series 2024A Bonds shall initially be issued as one fully registered State Bond. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be in such form as to permit the Drinking Water Board to make incremental advances on its total loan commitment to the City during the period of acquisition and construction of the Series 2024A Project and in compliance with Section 2.3 below. Section 2.2 Finding and Purpose. The Series 2024A Bonds are hereby authorized to be issued for the purpose of paying part of the Cost of Construction of the Series 2024A Project pursuant to Section 2.03 of the Master Indenture. Except for the City’s Outstanding Parity Bonds and the Series 2024A Bonds authorized by this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, the City has no outstanding bonds, notes or other obligations issued pursuant to the Indenture. 54854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 2.3 Advances of Proceeds. On or before fifteen (15) days prior to the first day of each calendar quarter beginning prior to the payment by the City of costs of construction of the Series 2024A Project, or at such other time as shall be specified by the Drinking Water Board, the City shall provide to the Drinking Water Board a certificate setting forth a schedule of the costs of construction which the City estimates will become due and payable by the City during the next calendar quarter. Advances made by the Drinking Water Board on the basis of such certificates shall be deposited in the Series 2024A Construction Account. All such advances shall be in the amount of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Upon receipt of evidence of deposit of each advance in the Series 2024A Construction Account, the [Finance Director of the Department of Public Utilities of the City] shall give telephonic authorization followed by written confirmation to the Drinking Water Board to stamp or write the date and amount of such advance made by the Drinking Water Board in the appropriate place on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount appearing on the State Bond. Each advance made by the Drinking Water Board on the State Bond shall constitute proceeds of the State Bond and shall be deemed to constitute the full purchase price of the corresponding principal amount of the State Bond noted on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount appearing on the State Bond. As advances are made by the Drinking Water Board, they shall be deemed to represent principal payments in the order of their maturity. Section 2.4 Debt Forgiveness. The Drinking Water Board has committed to purchase the Series 2024A Bonds for a purchase price of not to exceed Thirty-Nine Million Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($39,525,000). The Drinking Water Board has also agreed to forgive and relieve the City of a maximum amount of Nineteen Million Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($19,350,000) of the maximum Total Principal Sum of the Series 2024A Bonds such that the Repayable Principal Amount of the Series 2024A Bonds shall not exceed Twenty Million One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($20,175,000). [Accordingly, approximately [ ] percent ( %) of each incremental advance pursuant to Section 2.3 hereof shall be forgiven and shall be recorded under the “Debt Forgiveness Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount on the State Bond certificate. The remaining approximately [ ] percent ( %) of each increment advance shall be recorded under the “Repayable Principal Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount and shall constitute the total principal repayment obligation of the City with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds.] Section 2.5 Denominations, Payments, Payment Date, and Hardship Grant Assessment. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be in the denomination of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or any integral multiple thereof and shall be paid as provided in this Section 2.5. Except as provided in the next succeeding paragraph, principal payments, whether at maturity or by redemption, shall be payable upon presentation of the applicable Series 2024A Bonds at the offices of the Paying Agent for endorsement or surrender, or of any successor Paying Agent. So long as the Drinking Water Board is the Registered Owner of the Series 2024A Bonds, payments on the Series 2024A Bonds shall be made by check or draft without presentation of the Series 2024A Bonds and mailed to the Drinking Water Board as the Registered Owner at the address shown on the registration books maintained by the Registrar. Payment on the Series 64854-3464-3644, v. 3 2024A Bonds shall be made in any coin or currency which on the date of payment is legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be dated as of the Issue Date, and shall be payable in installment payments of Principal on February 1 in the years and in the amounts and shall bear a Hardship Grant Assessment on the principal amount of each Advance beginning on the date of such Advance at the rate of 1.5% per annum. The City shall make a Hardship Grant Assessment only payment (accruing from date of closing) on February 1, 2025. Principal payments are as follows and as further described herein: Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount 2030 $443,000 2048 $578,000 2031 449,000 2049 587,000 2032 456,000 2050 596,000 2033 463,000 2051 605,000 2034 470,000 2052 614,000 2035 477,000 2053 623,000 2036 484,000 2054 633,000 2037 491,000 2055 642,000 2038 498,000 2056 652,000 2039 506,000 2057 661,000 2040 514,000 2058 671,000 2041 521,000 2059 681,000 2042 529,000 2060 692,000 2043 537,000 2061 702,000 2044 545,000 2062 713,000 2045 553,000 2063 723,000 2046 562,000 2064 734,000 2047 570,000 If less than $20,175,000 is advanced on the Series 2024A Bonds, the repayment period shall be shortened and the number of annual principal installments shall be reduced in inverse order of payment (and the amount of the final remaining principal payment shall be reduced, if required) to correspond to the maximum principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds. The Hardship Grant Assessment on Series 2024A Bonds so payable, and punctually paid and duly provided for, on any Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date will be paid to the Registered Owner thereof at the close of business on the Regular Record Date for such Hardship Grant Assessment. Any such Hardship Grant Assessment not so punctually paid or duly provided for shall forthwith cease to be payable to the registered owner of any Series 2024A Bonds on such Regular Record Date and may be paid to the registered owner thereof at the close of business on a Special Record Date for the payment of such defaulted Hardship Grant Assessment to be fixed by the Trustee, notice thereof to be given to such registered owner not less than ten days prior to such Special Record Date. The Hardship Grant Assessment shall be paid by check or draft mailed on each Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date to the Holder of each of the Series 2024A Bonds as the name and address of such Holder appears on the Record Date in the Register. The Hardship 74854-3464-3644, v. 3 Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds shall be calculated on the basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Section 2.6 Delinquent Payment. Payments of principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds which are delinquent from the due date thereof shall draw interest at the rate of [eighteen percent (18%)] per annum on the delinquent payment from said due date until paid in full. Section 2.7 Exchange of State Bond. As long as the Drinking Water Board is the sole Registered Owner of the Series 2024A Bonds, the Series 2024A Bonds shall be issued only as a State Bond in the form prescribed in Exhibit A-1. It is recognized that the Drinking Water Board may sell or otherwise transfer the Series 2024A Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the State Financing Consolidation Act, Title 63B, Chapter 1b, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, or otherwise. In the event the Drinking Water Board determines to sell or otherwise transfer all or a portion of the Series 2024A Bonds pursuant to the State Financing Consolidation Act, or otherwise, the State Bond shall be exchanged at the office of the Paying Agent for a like aggregate principal amount of Exchange Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.7. Any Series 2024A Bond, or any portion thereof, which is sold or otherwise transferred or liquidated by the Drinking Water Board pursuant to the State Financing Consolidation Act, or otherwise, shall be in the form of an Exchange Bond prescribed in Exhibit A-2, and shall be executed pursuant to authorization contained in Section 3.04 of the Master Indenture. Each principal payment on the State Bond not previously paid or canceled shall be represented by an equivalent principal amount of Exchange Bonds, in authorized denominations, and of like maturity. The City and its officers shall execute and deliver such documents and perform such acts as may reasonably be required by the City to accomplish the exchange of the State Bond for Exchange Bonds, provided that the Drinking Water Board shall pay or cause to be paid all costs and other charges incident to such exchange and the City shall have no obligation to pay any such costs or charges. Section 2.8 Paying Agent. U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby appointed the Paying Agent for the Series 2024A Bonds, pursuant and subject to Section 7.02 of the Master Indenture. Principal of the Series 2024A Bonds when due shall be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of the Trustee, or of its successor as Paying Agent. Payment of the Hardship Grant Assessment on Series 2024A Bonds will be made by the Paying Agent pursuant to Section 2.5 herein. Section 2.9 Optional Redemption; Redemption Price. (a) The Series 2024A Bonds may be prepaid at the election of the City, in whole or in part, at any time in minimum amounts of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof, with the prepayments applied against the Principal of the Series 2024A Bonds in inverse order of the payment due dates thereof. (b) The City shall provide notice of redemption as required in Section 4.03 of the Master Indenture, and upon at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of the amount of prepayment and the date scheduled for prepayment to the Drinking Water Board with respect to the State Bonds, and at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid or redeemed to the date of redemption. 84854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 2.10 Execution of Series 2024A Bond. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the Mayor by manual or facsimile signature, and attested and countersigned by the City Recorder by manual or facsimile signature, and the City’s seal shall be affixed or a facsimile thereof shall be imprinted upon the Series 2024A Bonds. The Series 2024A Bonds shall then be delivered to the Trustee and manually authenticated by it. Section 2.11 Delivery of Series 2024A Bonds. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be delivered to the Drinking Water Board, upon compliance with the provisions of Section 3.02 of the Master Indenture. ARTICLE III APPLICATION OF SERIES 2024A BOND PROCEEDS AND OTHER MONEYS; ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF ACCOUNTS AND SUBACCOUNTS Section 3.1 Application of Proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds. The Drinking Water Board shall deposit with the Trustee the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds when advanced pursuant to Section 2.3 herein, and the Trustee shall deposit said proceeds into the Series 2024A Project Account established by Section 3.5 herein and held by the Trustee and upon the Trustee’s receipt of an executed requisition form from the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. At closing, payment of [$ ], which constitutes the first incremental advance of the Series 2024A Bonds shall be deposited in the Series 2024A Project Account within the Construction Fund. Section 3.2 Series 2024A Project Account. Disbursements of moneys in the Series 2024A Project Account shall be made in accordance with the terms of Section 5.03 of the General Indenture. Each requisition from said Series 2024A Project Account shall be approved by a qualified representative of the Drinking Water Board; provided, however, that the costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds shall be paid by the Trustee from the Series 2024A Project Account upon receipt from the City of an executed Cost of Issuance Disbursement Request in substantially the form of Exhibit B attached hereto. Section 3.3 Establishment of Debt Service Reserve Subaccount. There is hereby established for the Series 2024A Bonds the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount. The amount to be deposited from the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds into the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount is $0. The City shall, upon the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, deposit annually $74,562.50 into the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount until the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement of $745,625 has been met. Amounts deposited in the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount shall be used to pay the principal and Hardship Grant Assessment falling due on the Series 2024A Bonds at any time when there are insufficient funds in the Bond Service Account to pay the same, but pending such use may be invested as provided in the Master Indenture. No further deposits to said Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount need be made unless payments from said Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount have reduced the same below the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement, in which event the City agrees to restore the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount to the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement in the time and in the manner specified in Section 5.05 of the Master Indenture. In lieu of a separate subaccount as provided 94854-3464-3644, v. 3 herein, the City may use internal notations on its books in order to account for the accumulation and maintenance of the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement. Section 3.4 Renewal and Replacement Fund. The amount to be deposited from the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds into the Renewal and Replacement Fund is $-0-. Section 3.5 Establishment of Series 2024A Project Account. There is hereby established a Project Account in the Construction Fund designated as the “Series 2024A Project Account.” Moneys in the Series 2024A Project Account shall be used for the purposes and as authorized by Section 5.03 of the Master Indenture to pay the Cost of Construction of the Series 2024A Project. Section 3.6 Establishment of Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount. Pursuant to Section 5.06(a) of the Master Indenture, there is hereby established a separate Series Subaccount in the Bond Service Account in the Principal and Interest Fund designated as the “Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount.” Moneys shall be deposited into and paid from the Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount in accordance with Section 5.06 of the Master Indenture to pay Principal of and interest, if any, and the Hardship Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds. ARTICLE IV ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE CITY Section 4.1 Additional Covenants and Representations with Respect to the Series 2024A Bonds. The City hereby covenants, represents, and agrees with the holder of the Series 2024A Bonds issued hereunder the following: (a)The City agrees, in accepting the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds, to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations related to the Utah State Revolving Fund administered by the Drinking Water Board. These requirements include, but are not limited to, Title XIV of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996, OMB Circular A-133, the Utah Federal State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program (R309-705 of the Utah Administrative Code), the Utah Local Government Bonding Act, the Utah Money Management Act, the Utah Procurement Code and the State of Utah Legal Compliance Audit Guide. (b)The Series 2024A Bonds are issued on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds and comply with the Additional Bonds requirements of the Master Indenture. (c)Each position of the City having custody or control of any of the Revenues or of the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds shall be bonded by a responsible corporate surety in an amount not less than twice the annual debt service on the Series 2024A Bonds ($1,374,000). ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.1 Confirmation of Sale of Series 2024A Bonds. The sale of the Series 2024A Bonds to the Drinking Water Board at a price of $[39,525,000], is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. 104854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 5.2 System of Registration. The Indenture shall constitute a system of registration within the meaning and for all purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act, Chapter 7 of Title 15, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended. Section 5.3 Article and Section Headings. The headings or titles of the several articles and sections hereof, and any table of contents appended to copies hereof, shall be solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, construction or effect of this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. Section 5.4 Partial Invalidity. In any one or more of the covenants or agreements, or portions thereof, provided in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture to be performed shall be contrary to law (other than the provisions of the Indenture limiting the liability of the City to make payments on the Bonds solely from Revenues and other amounts pledged therefor by the Indenture), then such covenant or covenants, such agreement or agreements, or such portions thereof, shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants and agreements or portions thereof and shall in no way affect the validity of this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture or of the Series 2024A Bonds; but the Holders of the Series 2024A Bonds and any other Security Instrument Issuer and any Reserve Instrument Issuer shall retain all the rights and benefits accorded to them under the Act or any other applicable provisions of law. Section 5.5 Counterparts. This Twelfth Supplemental Indenture may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be regarded for all purposes as an original; and such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 5.6 Electronic Signatures Pursuant to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 46, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, all parties, including the Trustee, have agreed and consented to the use of electronic signatures in connection with all documents executed in connection with the Series 2024A Bonds, including this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. Section 5.7 Effective Date. This Twelfth Supplemental Indenture shall take effect immediately. Section 5.8 Confirmation of Master Indenture. As supplemented and amended by this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, and except as provided herein, the Master Indenture is in all respects ratified and confirmed, and the Master Indenture and this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture shall be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument so that all of the rights, remedies, terms, conditions, covenants and agreements of the Master Indenture shall apply and remain in full force and effect with respect to this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and to any revenues, receipts and moneys to be derived therefrom. Section 5.9 Representation Regarding Ethical Standards for City Officers and Employees and Former City Officers and Employees. The Trustee represents that it has not: (a) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (b) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of 114854-3464-3644, v. 3 securing business; (c) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in the City’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (d) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in the City’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code. TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture to be executed by the Mayor (or her designee) and countersigned by the City Recorder, and its official seal to be hereunto affixed and attested by the City Recorder, and to evidence its acceptance of the trusts hereby created, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association has caused this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture to be executed, all as of the date hereof. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH COUNTERSIGN AND ATTEST: By: Mayor By: City Recorder (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By: Trust Officer S-1 A-1-14854-3464-3644, v. 3 EXHIBIT A-1 (FORM OF STATE BOND) Registered Registered UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2024A Number R - 1 $39,525,000 Hardship Grant Assessment Rate Maturity Date Dated Date 1.5%February 1, 2064 [August 29], 2024 Registered Owner: STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, DRINKING WATER BOARD Principal Amount: THIRTY-NINE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS************************** Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), a duly organized and existing municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah, located in Salt Lake County, Utah, acknowledges itself indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay, in the manner and from the source hereinafter provided, to the registered owner identified above, or registered assigns, out of the special fund hereinbelow designated and not otherwise, the Repayable Principal Amount and Debt Forgiveness Amount, set forth in the “Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount” attached hereto (the “Certificate”), but in no event more than a maximum principal amount of $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000. [Accordingly, approximately percent ( %) of each incremental advance pursuant to Section of the Supplemental Indenture shall be forgiven and shall be recorded under the “Debt Forgiveness Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount on the Certificate. The remaining approximately percent ( %) of each increment advance shall be recorded under the “Repayable Principal Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount and shall constitute the total principal repayment obligation of the City with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds.] The outstanding principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds shall bear a Hardship Grant Assessment [accruing from the Issue Date] at the rate of 1.5% per annum payable beginning February 1, 2025 and thereafter on each on February 1, until the Series 2024A Bonds are paid in full. This Bond, as to principal when due, will be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as paying agent of the City, or its successor as such paying agent; provided, however, that as long as the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Board (the “Drinking A-1-24854-3464-3644, v. 3 Water Board”) is the registered holder of this Bond, installment payments of principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment shall be made without presentation of the Bond by check or draft mailed to the Drinking Water Board as the Registered Owner at the address shown on the registration books maintained by the Registrar. The Hardship Grant Assessment on this Bond shall be payable by check or draft mailed to the Registered Owner hereof at its address as it appears on the registration books of the Paying Agent, who shall also act as the Registrar for the City, or at such other address as is furnished to the Paying Agent in writing by such Registered Owner. The Hardship Grant Assessment hereon shall be deemed to be paid by the Paying Agent when mailed. Both Principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Principal shall be payable in registered installments on February 1 of each of the years as set forth in the following repayment schedule: Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount 2030 $443,000 2048 $578,000 2031 449,000 2049 587,000 2032 456,000 2050 596,000 2033 463,000 2051 605,000 2034 470,000 2052 614,000 2035 477,000 2053 623,000 2036 484,000 2054 633,000 2037 491,000 2055 642,000 2038 498,000 2056 652,000 2039 506,000 2057 661,000 2040 514,000 2058 671,000 2041 521,000 2059 681,000 2042 529,000 2060 692,000 2043 537,000 2061 702,000 2044 545,000 2062 713,000 2045 553,000 2063 723,000 2046 562,000 2064 734,000 2047 570,000 If less than $20,175,000 is advanced on the Series 2024A Bonds, the repayment period shall be shortened and the number of annual principal installments shall be reduced in inverse order of payment (and the amount of the final remaining principal payment shall be reduced, if required) to correspond to the maximum principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds. Payments of principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds which are delinquent from the due date thereof shall draw interest at the rate of [eighteen percent (18%)] per annum on the delinquent payment from said due date until paid in full. This Bond is a special obligation of the City and is one of the public utilities revenue bonds of the City (the “Bonds”) issued under and by virtue of the Act and under and pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, and heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (said trustee and any successor thereto under the Master Indenture being herein referred to A-1-34854-3464-3644, v. 3 as the “Trustee”), as further amended and supplemented by a Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of [August] 1, 2024 (the “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and the Trustee (such Master Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and as hereafter amended and supplemented, being herein referred to as the “Indenture”), for the purposes of (a) paying all or a portion of the costs of construction of improvements to its water system, including, but not limited to lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements and related improvements and (b) paying of all expenses incident thereto and to the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. This Bond is issued on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds (as defined in the Indenture), such that this Bond is secured by an equal lien pledge of the Net Revenues of the City’s System with said Outstanding Parity Bonds. The Bonds are special limited obligations of the City, payable solely from the Net Revenues, moneys, securities, and funds pledged therefor in the Indenture. Neither the credit nor the taxing power of the City, the State or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof is pledged for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the State or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof. The issuance of the Bonds shall not directly, indirectly, or contingently obligate the City or the State or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof to levy any form of taxation therefor or to make any appropriation for the payment of the Bonds. THE CITY IS OBLIGATED TO PAY PRINCIPAL, INTEREST, IF ANY, AND THE HARDSHIP GRANT ASSESSMENT ON THIS BOND SOLELY FROM THE REVENUES (AFTER PAYMENT OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS) AND OTHER FUNDS OF THE CITY PLEDGED THEREFOR UNDER THE TERMS OF THE INDENTURE (AS DEFINED BELOW). THIS BOND IS NOT A DEBT OF THE CITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF INDEBTEDNESS OR PROVISIONS THEREFOR. PURSUANT TO THE INDENTURE, SUFFICIENT REVENUES HAVE BEEN PLEDGED AND WILL BE SET ASIDE INTO SPECIAL FUNDS BY THE CITY TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROMPT PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THIS BOND AND ALL BONDS OF THE SERIES OF WHICH IT IS A PART. This Bond is one of a Series of Bonds designated as “Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A” (the “Series 2024A Bonds”), limited to the aggregate principal amount of 39,525,000, dated as of the dated date identified above, and duly issued under and by virtue of the Act and under and pursuant to the Indenture and a Resolution of the City Council of the City adopted on [July 2], 2024. Copies of the Indenture are on file at the office of the City Recorder in Salt Lake City, Utah, and at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, in Salt Lake City, Utah, and reference to the Indenture and the Act is made for a description of the pledge and covenants securing the Series 2024A Bonds, the nature, manner and extent of enforcement of such pledge and covenants, the terms and conditions upon which the Series 2024A Bonds are issued and additional Bonds may be issued thereunder, and a statement of the rights, duties, immunities and obligations of the City and of the Trustee. Such pledge and other obligations of the City under the Indenture may be discharged at or prior to the maturity or redemption of the Series 2024A A-1-44854-3464-3644, v. 3 Bonds upon the making of provision for the payment thereof on the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture. Pursuant to the Indenture, the definition of the System is subject to including additional systems of the City by Supplemental Indenture, without the consent of the holders of Outstanding Bonds. This Bond and the issue of Bonds of which it is a part are issued in conformity with and after full compliance with the Constitution of the State of Utah and pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), and all other laws applicable thereto. As provided in the Indenture, Bonds may be issued from time to time in one or more series in various principal amounts, may mature at different times, may bear interest at different rates, and may otherwise vary as provided in the Indenture, and the aggregate principal amount of Bonds which may be issued is not limited. All Bonds issued and to be issued under the Indenture are and will be equally and ratably secured by the pledge and covenants made therein, except as otherwise expressly provided or permitted in or pursuant to the Indenture. To the extent and in the respects permitted by the Indenture, the Indenture may be modified, supplemented or amended by action on behalf of the City taken in the manner and subject to the conditions and exceptions prescribed in the Indenture. The holder or owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Indenture or to institute action to enforce the pledge or covenants made therein or to take any action with respect to an event of default under the Indenture or to institute, appear in, or defend any suit or other proceeding with respect thereto, except as provided in the Indenture. This Bond is transferable, as provided in the Indenture, only upon the books of the City kept for that purpose at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Trustee, duly executed by the registered owner or such duly authorized attorney, and thereupon the City shall issue in the name of the transferee a new registered Bond or Bonds of the same aggregate principal amount and series, designation, maturity and interest rate as the surrendered Bond, all as provided in the Indenture and upon the payment of the charges therein prescribed. The City and the Trustee may treat and consider the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the holder and absolute owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal hereof and interest due hereon and for all other purposes whatsoever. This Bond is subject to prepayment and redemption at any time, in whole or in part (if in part, in integral multiples of $1,000), at the election of the City in inverse order of the due date of the principal installments hereof and if less than all Bonds of a particular due date are to be redeemed, in such manner as the Trustee shall deem fair and appropriate, upon notice given as set forth in the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount to be so prepaid. The Series 2024A Bonds are issuable solely in the form of fully registered Bonds, without coupons, in the denomination of $1,000, or any integral multiple of $1,000. A-1-54854-3464-3644, v. 3 Except as otherwise provided herein and unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, words and phrases used herein shall have the same meanings as such words and phrases in the Indenture. It is hereby certified and recited that all conditions, acts and things required by the Constitution or statutes of the State of Utah or by the Act, or the Indenture to exist, to have happened or to have been performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Bond exist, have happened and have been performed and that the issue of Bonds, together with all other indebtedness of the City, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by said Constitution and statutes. This Bond shall not be valid until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been signed by the Trustee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, has caused this Bond to be signed in its name and on its behalf by the signature of its Mayor (or her designee), and its corporate seal to be impressed or imprinted hereon, and attested and countersigned by the signature of its City Recorder (the signatures of said Mayor and City Recorder being by facsimile or manual signature), all as of the dated date specified above. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH (SEAL) ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: By Mayor By City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney A-1-64854-3464-3644, v. 3 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Indenture and is one of the Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A of Salt Lake City, Utah. U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By: (Manual Signature) Authorized Officer Date of Authentication: [August ], 2024. A-1-74854-3464-3644, v. 3 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE (No writing to be placed herein except by the Bond Registrar) Date of Registration Name of Registered Owner Signature of Bond Registrar State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board A-1-84854-3464-3644, v. 3 CERTIFICATE OF DATES OF PAYMENT AND AMOUNT The undersigned authorized representative of the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board (the “Board”), hereby certifies that the Board has received written authorization from the [Finance Director of the Department of Public Utilities] of the City to stamp or write the amount or amounts indicated below on the date or dates set forth opposite such amount(s); that the amount last inserted under the column “Total Principal Sum” is the total amount received by the City for the issuance of this Bond, and that the undersigned has placed his/her signature in the space provided opposite such amount(s) to evidence the same. A copy of this certificate shall be forwarded to the Trustee (U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association) pursuant to the requirement in [Section 2.3] of the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated as of [August] 1, 2024. Amount of Payment Date of Payment [Debt Forgiveness Amount] Repayable Principal Amount Total Principal Sum Board Representative Signature $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ A-2-1 EXHIBIT A-2 (FORM OF EXCHANGE BOND) Registered Registered UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2024A Number R - $ Hardship Grant Assessment Rate Maturity Date Issue Date %February 1, 20 , 20 Registered Owner: Principal Amount: AND NO/100 DOLLARS Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), a duly organized and existing municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah, located in Salt Lake County, Utah, acknowledges itself indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay, but solely in the manner and from the revenues and sources hereinafter provided, to the Registered Owner identified above or its registered assigns, on the Maturity Date specified above, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the Principal Amount identified above. The Hardship Grant Assessment on the Principal Amount shall be payable by check or draft mailed by U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (the “Paying Agent”) to the Registered Owner hereof on each February 1. Principal and redemption price of this Bond shall be payable upon presentation of this Bond to the Paying Agent, for payment at maturity. If any installment payment of Bond principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment is not paid when due and payable, the City shall pay the Hardship Grant Assessment at the rate of [eighteen percent (18%)] per annum on the delinquent installment from said due date until paid. All payments shall be made in any coin or currency which on the date of payment is legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America. This Bond is one of an authorized issue of bonds of like date, term and effect except as to maturity, in the aggregate principal amount of Dollars ($ ), issued in exchange for the conversion of the City’s $39,525,000 Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A, issued under and by virtue of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended (the “Act”), and under and pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, and heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (said trustee and any successor thereto under the Master Indenture being herein referred to as the “Trustee”), as further amended and supplemented by a Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of [August] 1, 2024 (the “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and the Trustee (such Master Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and as hereafter amended and A-1-24854-3464-3644, v. 3 supplemented, being herein referred to as the “Indenture”), for the purposes of (a) paying all or a portion of the costs of construction of improvements to its water system, including, but not limited to the [planning and construction of lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements] and related improvements and (b) paying of all expenses incident thereto and to the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. This Bond is a special, limited obligation of the City payable solely from the Net Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) of the System and does not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any state constitutional or statutory limitation. In no event shall this Bond be deemed or construed to be a general obligation indebtedness of the City or payable from any funds of the City other than the Revenues of the System. As provided in the Indenture, bonds, notes and other obligations may be issued from time to time in one or more series in various principal amounts, may mature at different times, may bear Hardship Grant Assessments or interest at different rates and may otherwise vary as provided in the Indenture, and the aggregate principal amount of such bonds, notes and other obligations which may be issued is not limited. This Bond and all other bonds, notes and other obligations issued and to be issued under the Indenture on a parity with this Bond are and will be equally and ratably secured by the pledge and covenants made therein, except as otherwise expressly provided or permitted in or pursuant to the Indenture. The issuance of this Bond shall not, directly, indirectly or contingently, obligate the City or any agency, instrumentality or political subdivision thereof to levy any form of taxation therefor or to make any appropriation for its payment. The Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity at any time, in whole or in part (if in part, in integral multiples of $1,000), at the election of the City in inverse order of maturity (if less than all of the Bonds maturing on any single date are called for redemption, the Trustee shall select the Bonds to be redeemed, from the Outstanding Bonds maturing on that date not previously called for redemption, in such manner as in the Trustee’s sole discretion it shall deem appropriate and fair) upon not less than thirty (30) days’ nor more than forty-five (45) days’ prior notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of each Bond to be redeemed. Notice of redemption shall be mailed by the City, postage prepaid, to the registered owners of said Bonds addressed to such owners at their address appearing on the registration books maintained by the City. Subject to the provisions of the Indenture, the Series 2024A Bonds are issuable in fully registered form, without coupons, in denomination equal to the principal amount of the bonds or, upon exchange, in the denomination of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The City covenants and agrees that it will fix rates for service to customers of the System sufficient to pay this Bond when due, and principal and the Hardship Grant Assessments on all bonds and Bonds issued on a priority to or parity with this Bond, if any, as the same fall due, provided such rates must be reasonable rates for the type, kind and character of the service rendered, and will collect and account for the Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) to be received for such service, and will set aside one hundred percent (100%) of the Net Revenues of the System A-1-34854-3464-3644, v. 3 (as defined in the Indenture) to pay this Bond according to the payment terms hereinabove set forth and the principal and Hardship Grant Assessments on all bonds and notes issued on a parity with this Bond, if any. To the extent and in the respects permitted by the Indenture, the Indenture may be modified or amended by action on behalf of the City taken in the manner and subject to the conditions and exceptions prescribed in the Indenture. The Registered Owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Indenture or to institute action to enforce the pledge or covenants made therein or to take any action with respect to an event of default under the Indenture or to institute, appear in, or defend any suit or other proceeding with respect thereto, except as provided in the Indenture. This Bond is transferable by the registered holder hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing at the office of the Trustee (the “Registrar”) but only in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon payment of the charges provided in the Indenture and upon surrender and cancellation of this Bond. Upon such transfer a new registered Bond or Bonds of the same series and the same maturity and of authorized denomination or denominations for the same aggregate principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor. It is hereby certified, recited and declared that all conditions, acts and things essential to the validity of this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part do exist, have happened and have been done, and that every requirement of law affecting the issue hereof has been duly complied with; that this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part does not exceed any limitation prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the State of Utah; that one hundred percent (100%) of the Net Revenues to be derived from the operation of the System, including any future improvements, additions and extensions thereto, have been pledged and will be set aside into said special fund by the City to be used for the payment of this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part, and all bonds and notes issued on a parity with this Bond, if any, and that said Net Revenues of the System are not pledged, hypothecated or anticipated in any way other than by the issue of Series 2024A Bonds of which this Bond is one and all bonds and notes issued on a parity with this Bond, if any. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Indenture until the Certificate of Authentication on this Bond shall have been manually signed by the Trustee. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH COUNTERSIGN AND ATTEST: By: Mayor By: City Recorder B-1 EXHIBIT B COST OF ISSUANCE DISBURSEMENT REQUEST U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 170 South Main, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of [August 1], 2024, you are hereby authorized to pay to the following costs of issuance from the Series 2024A Project Account: [See Attached Schedule] SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Authorized Representative Form of Schedule COSTS OF ISSUANCE Payee Purpose Amount C-1 EXHIBIT C FORM OF REQUISITION Re: Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A in the sum of $ U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 170 South Main, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 You are hereby authorized to disburse from the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund with regard to the above-referenced bond issue the following: REQUISITION NUMBER: NAME AND ADDRESS OF PAYEE: AMOUNT: $ PURPOSE FOR WHICH EXPENSE HAS BEEN INCURRED: Each obligation, item of cost, or expense mentioned herein has been properly incurred, is a proper charge against the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund based upon audited, itemized claims substantiated in support thereof (evidence of such support not herein required by the Trustee), is justly due and owing and constitutes a Cost of a Project and has not been the basis for a previous withdrawal. The amount remaining in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund after such disbursement is made, together with the amount of unencumbered Net Revenues, if any, which the City reasonably estimates will be deposited in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund during the period of construction of the Project from the investment of moneys on deposit in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund, will, together with any other moneys lawfully available or expected to be lawfully available for payment of the Cost of the Project and after payment of the amount requested in said requisition, be sufficient to pay the Cost of Completion for the Project in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor then in effect; it being understood that no moneys from the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund may be expended unless, after giving effect thereto, the funds remaining in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund, together with such other funds and income and lawfully available moneys, are sufficient to pay the Cost of Completion for the Project. C-24854-3464-3644, v. 3 DATED: By: Its: STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DRINKING WATER BOARD By: Its: Assistant Executive Secretary Salt Lake City PROPOSED BOND REPAYMENT SCHEDULE 51 % Loan & 49 % P.F. PRINCIPAL $20,175,000.00 ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE February 1, 2024 HARDSHIP GRANT ASSESSMENT FEE 1.50%FIRST P&I PAYMENT DUE February 1, 2025 TERM 39 REVENUE BOND $20,175,000 NOMIN. PAYMENT $687,052.16 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$19,350,000.00 BEGINNING YEAR BALANCE DATE OF PAYMENT PAYMENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST ENDING BALANCE PAYM NO. =========== ==================== ================ ================ = ================== ================== ================= ===== 2025 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2025 $302,625.00 *$0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 0 2026 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2026 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 1 2027 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2027 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 2 2028 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2028 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 3 2029 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2029 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 4 2030 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2030 $745,625.00 $443,000.00 $302,625.00 $19,732,000.00 5 2031 $19,732,000.00 February 1, 2031 $744,980.00 $449,000.00 $295,980.00 $19,283,000.00 6 2032 $19,283,000.00 February 1, 2032 $745,245.00 $456,000.00 $289,245.00 $18,827,000.00 7 2033 $18,827,000.00 February 1, 2033 $745,405.00 $463,000.00 $282,405.00 $18,364,000.00 8 2034 $18,364,000.00 February 1, 2034 $745,460.00 $470,000.00 $275,460.00 $17,894,000.00 9 2035 $17,894,000.00 February 1, 2035 $745,410.00 $477,000.00 $268,410.00 $17,417,000.00 10 2036 $17,417,000.00 February 1, 2036 $745,255.00 $484,000.00 $261,255.00 $16,933,000.00 11 2037 $16,933,000.00 February 1, 2037 $744,995.00 $491,000.00 $253,995.00 $16,442,000.00 12 2038 $16,442,000.00 February 1, 2038 $744,630.00 $498,000.00 $246,630.00 $15,944,000.00 13 2039 $15,944,000.00 February 1, 2039 $745,160.00 $506,000.00 $239,160.00 $15,438,000.00 14 2040 $15,438,000.00 February 1, 2040 $745,570.00 $514,000.00 $231,570.00 $14,924,000.00 15 2041 $14,924,000.00 February 1, 2041 $744,860.00 $521,000.00 $223,860.00 $14,403,000.00 16 2042 $14,403,000.00 February 1, 2042 $745,045.00 $529,000.00 $216,045.00 $13,874,000.00 17 2043 $13,874,000.00 February 1, 2043 $745,110.00 $537,000.00 $208,110.00 $13,337,000.00 18 2044 $13,337,000.00 February 1, 2044 $745,055.00 $545,000.00 $200,055.00 $12,792,000.00 19 2045 $12,792,000.00 February 1, 2045 $744,880.00 $553,000.00 $191,880.00 $12,239,000.00 20 2046 $12,239,000.00 February 1, 2046 $745,585.00 $562,000.00 $183,585.00 $11,677,000.00 21 2047 $11,677,000.00 February 1, 2047 $745,155.00 $570,000.00 $175,155.00 $11,107,000.00 22 2048 $11,107,000.00 February 1, 2048 $744,605.00 $578,000.00 $166,605.00 $10,529,000.00 23 2049 $10,529,000.00 February 1, 2049 $744,935.00 $587,000.00 $157,935.00 $9,942,000.00 24 2050 $9,942,000.00 February 1, 2050 $745,130.00 $596,000.00 $149,130.00 $9,346,000.00 25 2051 $9,346,000.00 February 1, 2051 $745,190.00 $605,000.00 $140,190.00 $8,741,000.00 26 2052 $8,741,000.00 February 1, 2052 $745,115.00 $614,000.00 $131,115.00 $8,127,000.00 27 2053 $8,127,000.00 February 1, 2053 $744,905.00 $623,000.00 $121,905.00 $7,504,000.00 28 2054 $7,504,000.00 February 1, 2054 $745,560.00 $633,000.00 $112,560.00 $6,871,000.00 29 2055 $6,871,000.00 February 1, 2055 $745,065.00 $642,000.00 $103,065.00 $6,229,000.00 30 2056 $6,229,000.00 February 1, 2056 $745,435.00 $652,000.00 $93,435.00 $5,577,000.00 31 2057 $5,577,000.00 February 1, 2057 $744,655.00 $661,000.00 $83,655.00 $4,916,000.00 32 2058 $4,916,000.00 February 1, 2058 $744,740.00 $671,000.00 $73,740.00 $4,245,000.00 33 2059 $4,245,000.00 February 1, 2059 $744,675.00 $681,000.00 $63,675.00 $3,564,000.00 34 2060 $3,564,000.00 February 1, 2060 $745,460.00 $692,000.00 $53,460.00 $2,872,000.00 35 2061 $2,872,000.00 February 1, 2061 $745,080.00 $702,000.00 $43,080.00 $2,170,000.00 36 2062 $2,170,000.00 February 1, 2062 $745,550.00 $713,000.00 $32,550.00 $1,457,000.00 37 2063 $1,457,000.00 February 1, 2063 $744,855.00 $723,000.00 $21,855.00 $734,000.00 38 2064 $734,000.00 February 1, 2064 $745,010.00 $734,000.00 $11,010.00 $0.00 39 *Interest Only Payment $27,592,515.00 $20,175,000.00 $7,417,515.00 MAY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JUNE S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 JULY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AUGUST S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 DRAFT Legend BC:Bond/ Disclosure Counsel - Gilmore & Bell, P.C. (Brad Patterson) CA:City Attorney: () CC:City Council - Salt Lake City CO:City Officials: (Mary Beth Thompson and Russ Sundquist) CR:City Recorder's Office: (Cindy Lou Trishman) CT:City Treasurer's Office: (Marina Scott) DDW Division of Drinking Water (Andrea Thurlow and Heather Pattee) DWB:Drinking Water Board (Michael J. Grange) DWBA:Drinking Water Board Attorney (William L. Prater, Esq.) MA:Municipal Advisor - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (John Crandall and Elizabeth Read) M:Mayor: (Erin Mendenhall) PU:Public Utilities Office: (Laura Briefer, Lisa Tarufelli and Teresa Gray) T:Trustee - US Bank (Laurel Bailey) *Preliminary; Subject to Change Calendar of Bonding Events $20,175,000* Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024 (Drinking Water Board SRF Loan) May 9, 2024 DATE EVENT STATUS PARTICIPANTS February 29 Drinking Water Board authorized construction loan.DWB May 13 Bond Counsel prepares and distributes initial drafts of the Indenture and Parameters Resolution.BC May 21 Council Transmittal Packets (including Form of Parameters Resolution and Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds To Be Issued as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code) due to Mayor's Office for June 11 briefing. PU, BC June 11 Regular City Council Meeting: Bond transaction briefing.CC, PU, MA Council Transmittal Packets due to Mayor's Office for July 2 adoption of Parameters Resolution (approving previously circulated documents).PU, BC June 19 Market Holiday: Juneteenth National Independence Day.- July 2 Regular City Council Meeting: Council adopts Bond Parameters Resolution and sets the date of August 13 for Public Hearing.CC, PU, MA July 3 City Recorder posts “Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds To Be Issued as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code” . (30-day contest period begins)BC, CR July 4 Holiday: Independence Day.- July 8 City mails out notices monthly billing notices per State requirements.PU August 2 End of 30-day contest period.- August 13 Regular City Council Meeting: Public Hearing on bond issue.CC, PU, MA August 20 Distribution of closing documents.BC August 28 City executes and delivers all documentation to Bond Counsel prior to closing.M, CC, PU August 29 Bond Closing. Delivery of the bond proceeds to the City.ALL TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: May 21, 2024 Victoria Petro, Chair ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor J1ULove Jill Love (May 23, 202416:21 MDT) LAURA BRIEFER, DIRECTOR Department of Public Utilities CITY COUNCIL TRANSM ITTAL Date Received: 05/23/2024 Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 05/23/2024 SUBJECT: Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A STAFF CONTACT: Lisa M. Tarufelli, Finance Administrator, 801-483-6755 Iisa.tarufel Ii@slcgov.com Laura Briefer, Director, 801-483-6741 laura.briefer(ci),slcgov.com Teresa Gray, Water Quality and Treatment Administrator, 801-483-6744 teresa.gray@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing/Discussion RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider adopting a Bond Parameters Resolution for the issuance and sale of up to $39,525,000 principal amount of Salt Lake City Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A. This includes a recommendation to 1) brief the Council on June 11, 2024 in anticipation of adopting a Bond Parameters Resolution for the aforementioned bond issue; 2) adopt a Bond Parameters Resolution on July 2, 2024 approving the issuance of up to $39,525,000 principal amount of Salt Lake City Public Utilities Revenue Bond, Series 2024A and give authority to certain officers to approve the final terms and provisions of and confirm the issuance of the Bond within certain parameters set forth in the attached Bond Parameters Resolution; and 3) hold a public hearing on August 13, 2024. BUDGET IMPACT: None. The FY25 budget anticipated the bond issuance (SRF Loan Proceeds). No budget opening will be required. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In accordance with provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, the City is required to hold a public a hearing to receive input from the public for all bond issues with respect to: a) the issuance of the Series 2024A revenue bonds and b) the potential economic impact that the water infrastructure improvements will have on the private sector. The financing team is requesting that the City Council approve the Bond Parameters Resolution on July 2, 2024 setting Tuesday, August 13, 2024 as the date to hold the public hearing. A Notice of Public Hearing is required to be published once at least 14 days before the public hearing. The publication of that notice is scheduled for July 3, 2024. FROM:Laura Briefer, Public Utilities Director The Bond Parameters Resolution for the above-referenced bond issue contemplates the issuance of up to a $39,525,000 principal amount bond bearing a hardship grant assessment fee in lieu of interest not to exceed 1.5% per annum with a bond period not to exceed 39 years. Public Utilities received a Federal SRF Loan Authorization through the State Drinking Water Board for the planning and construction of lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements. The loan will be secured by a non-voted Water Revenue Bond. The authorized loan is up to $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000, for up to 39 years at 1.5% hardship grant assessment fee in lieu of interest. Public Utilities is implementing a 5-year approach for planning and construction associated with a Lead Service Line Replacement Program (Program). This Program is being conducted to comply with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SOWA) and its revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule. Information gathered through the planning phases of the project will inform the subsequent construction required for lead service removals. Construction will include removal and replacement of both public services and private services. Public Utilities presented information to the City Council about the Lead and Copper Rule changes and our anticipated approach to comply with the changes in January 2023. Draft copies of the Bond Parameters Resolution, Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, LSL Signed Authorization Letter from the Drinking Water Board, draft amortization schedule, and preliminary calendar of events are included for your review. These documents are subject to change. Attachments: Bond Parameters Resolution Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture SLC LSL Signed Authorization Letter Draft Loan Amortization Schedule Preliminary Calendar of Events cc: Lisa Tarufelli, Public Utilities Finance Administrator Teresa Gray, Public Utilities Water Quality and Treatment Administrator Mark Kittrell, Salt Lake City Deputy Attorney Marina Scott 4871-4591-9676, v. 3 Gilmore Bell DRAFT 05/21/2024 Salt Lake City, Utah July 2, 2024 The City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), met in regular session at the regular meeting place of the Council in Salt Lake City, Utah, at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 2, 2024, with the following members present: Present: Victoria Petro Chair Chris Wharton Vice Chair Alejandro Puy Council Member Eva Lopez Chavez Council Member Darin Mano Council Member Dan Dugan Council Member Sarah Young Council Member There were also present: Erin Mendenhall Mayor Katherine N. Lewis City Attorney Absent: After the meeting had been duly called to order and after other matters not pertinent to this Resolution had been discussed, a Certificate of Compliance with Open Meeting Law with respect to this July 2, 2024 meeting was presented to the Council, a copy of which is attached hereto. The following resolution was then introduced in written form, was fully discussed, and pursuant to motion duly made by Council Member and seconded by Council Member , was adopted by the following vote: AYE: NAY: The resolution is as follows: 24871-4591-9676, v. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT MORE THAN $39,525,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2024A; FIXING THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BONDS, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF YEARS OVER WHICH THE BONDS MAY MATURE, THE MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE, IF ANY, OR ASSESSMENT FEE WHICH THE BONDS MAY BEAR, AND THE MAXIMUM DISCOUNT FROM PAR AT WHICH THE BONDS MAY BE SOLD; PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED; PROVIDING FOR THE RUNNING OF A CONTEST PERIOD; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY THE CITY OF A SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO THE CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS RESOLUTION; AND RELATED MATTERS. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Bond Act”), Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), is authorized to issue public utilities revenue bonds (to be issued in one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the City) payable from the net revenues of its existing water, sewer, storm drain and street lighting systems (collectively, the “System”) for the municipal purposes set forth therein; and WHEREAS, subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City Council of the City (the “Council”) desires to authorize the issuance of the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A (the “Series 2024A Bonds”) to (a) finance water improvements to the System, including the replacement of water lines (collectively, the “Project”) and (b) pay costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, pursuant to this Resolution, the Bond Act, a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (formerly known as U.S. Bank National Association), as trustee (the “Trustee”), and a Supplemental Indenture to be entered into between the City and the Trustee (the “Supplemental Indenture” and collectively with the Master Indenture, the “Indenture”), in substantially the form presented to the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted and which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Bond Act provides that prior to issuing bonds, an issuing entity must (a) give notice of its intent to issue such bonds and (b) hold a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to (i) the issuance of the bonds and (ii) the potential economic impact that the improvement, facility or property for which the bonds pay all or part of the cost will have on the private sector; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to call a public hearing for this purpose and to publish a notice of such hearing with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds; and 34871-4591-9676, v. 3 WHEREAS, the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board (the “Drinking Water Board”) has offered to purchase the Series 2024A Bonds; and WHEREAS, in order to allow the City, in consultation with the City’s Municipal Advisor, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (the “Municipal Advisor”) flexibility in setting the pricing date and final terms of the Series 2024A Bonds, the Council desires to grant to (a) the (i) Mayor of the City; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Mayor and the Mayor’s Chief of Staff, the City Treasurer; or (iv) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Mayor, the Mayor’s Chief of Staff and the City Treasurer, the Deputy Treasurer of the City and (b) (i) the Chair of the Council; or (ii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of the Chair of the Council, the Vice Chair of the Council; or (iii) in the event of the absence or incapacity of both the Chair and Vice Chair of the Council, any other member of the Council (collectively, the “Designated Officers”), the authority to approve the final interest rates, if any, assessment fees, principal amounts, terms, maturities, redemption or other features, and purchase price at which the Series 2024A Bonds shall be sold and to make any changes with respect thereto from those terms which were before the Council at the time of adoption of this Resolution, provided such terms do not exceed the parameters set forth for such terms in this Resolution (the “Parameters”); NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. For the purpose of financing the Project and paying costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, the Council hereby authorizes the issuance of the City’s Series 2024A Bonds which shall be designated “Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A” (to be issued from time to time as one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the City) in the initial aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $39,525,000. The Series 2024A Bonds shall mature in not more than thirty-nine (39) years from their date or dates, shall be sold at a price not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total principal amount thereof with the understanding that the Drinking Water Board has agreed to forgive $19,350,000 in principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds such that the net principal repayment amount shall be $20,175,000. The Series 2024A Bonds shall not bear interest but shall bear an annual Hardship Grant Assessment Fee instead of interest at a rate not to exceed one and one-half percent (1.5%) per annum, and may be non-callable or subject to redemption, all as shall be approved by the Designated Officers in consultation with the City’s Municipal Advisor, all within the Parameters set forth herein. Section 2. The Supplemental Indenture in substantially the form presented at this meeting and attached hereto as Exhibits B is hereby authorized, approved, and confirmed. The Mayor or the Mayor’s Chief of Staff as the Mayor’s designee (collectively referred to herein as the “Mayor”) are hereby authorized to execute and deliver and the City Recorder or Deputy City Recorder (the “City Recorder”) to attest or countersign, the Supplemental Indenture, in substantially the forms and with substantially the content as the form presented at this meeting for and on behalf of the City, with final terms as may be established by the Designated Officers, in consultation with the Municipal Advisor, within the Parameters set forth herein, and with such alterations, changes or additions as may be necessary or as may be authorized by Section 4 hereof. The Designated Officers are each hereby authorized to specify and agree as to the final 44871-4591-9676, v. 3 principal amounts, terms, discounts, maturities, interest rates, assessment fees, redemption and other features, and purchase price with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds for and on behalf of the City, provided that such terms are within the Parameters set by this Resolution. Section 3. The appropriate officials of the City are authorized to make any alterations, changes, deletions or additions to the Indenture, the Series 2024A Bonds, or any other document herein authorized and approved which may be necessary to conform the same to the final terms of the Series 2024A Bonds (within the Parameters set by this Resolution), to correct errors or omissions therein, to complete the same, to remove ambiguities therefrom, or to conform the same to other provisions of said instruments, to the provisions of this Resolution or any resolution adopted by the Council or the provisions of the laws of the State of Utah or the United States. The execution thereof by the Mayor on behalf of the City shall conclusively establish such necessity, appropriateness, and approval with respect to all such additions, modifications, deletions, and changes incorporated therein. Section 4. The form, terms, and provisions of the Series 2024A Bonds and the provisions for the signatures, authentication, payment, registration, transfer, exchange, redemption, and number shall be as set forth in the Indenture. The Mayor and City Recorder are hereby authorized and directed to execute and seal the Series 2024A Bonds and to deliver said Series 2024A Bonds to the Trustee for authentication. The signatures of the Mayor and the City Recorder may be by facsimile or manual execution. Section 5. The appropriate officials of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Trustee the written order of the City for authentication and delivery of the Series 2024A Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture. Section 6. Upon their issuance, the Series 2024A Bonds will constitute special limited obligations of the City payable solely from and to the extent of the sources set forth in the Series 2024A Bonds and the Indenture. No provision of this Resolution, the Indenture, the Series 2024A Bonds, or any other instrument, shall be construed as creating a general obligation of the City, or of creating a general obligation of the State of Utah or any political subdivision thereof, or as incurring or creating a charge upon the general credit of the City or its taxing powers. Section 7. The appropriate officials of the City, and each of them, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver for and on behalf of the City any or all additional certificates, documents and other papers (including, without limitation, any reserve instrument guaranty agreements permitted by the Indenture) and to perform all other acts they may deem necessary or appropriate in order to implement and carry out the matters authorized in this Resolution and the documents authorized and approved herein. Section 8. Pursuant to Section 11-14-318 of the Bond Act, the City shall hold a public hearing on August 13, 2024, to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and (b) the potential economic impact that the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds will have on the private sector. 54871-4591-9676, v. 3 The date for such public hearing shall not be less than fourteen (14) days after notice of the public hearing is posted as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102 (i) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (ii) on the City’s official website, and (iii) in a public location within the City that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the City. The City Recorder shall cause a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits hereto) to be kept on file in the office of the City Recorder, for public examination during the regular business hours of the City until at least thirty (30) days from and after the initial posting thereof. The City directs its officers and staff to post a “Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued” in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Bond Act”), that on July 2, 2024, the City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized the issuance of the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A (the “Series 2024A Bonds”) (to be issued in one or more series and with such other name, series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the City) and called a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and (b) any potential economic impact that the Project described herein to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds may have on the private sector. PURPOSE, TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING The City shall hold a public hearing on August 13, 2024, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. at 451 South State Street, Room 315, Salt Lake City, Utah. The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and (b) any potential economic impact that the project to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds may have on the private sector. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate. Members of the public may respond in writing at the address of the City or at the public hearing. All feedback will be forwarded to the Utah Division of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Board. PURPOSE FOR ISSUING THE SERIES 2024A BONDS The Series 2024A Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing water improvements, including the replacement of water lines, to the City’s water, sewer, storm drain and street lighting systems (collectively, the “System”) and paying costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. REVENUES TO BE PLEDGED The Series 2024A Bonds are special limited obligations of the City payable from the revenues of the System (the “Revenues”). PARAMETERS OF THE SERIES 2024A BONDS The City intends to issue the Series 2024A Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not more than Thirty-Nine Million Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($39,525,000), to mature in not more than thirty-nine (39) years from their date or dates, shall be sold at a price not 64871-4591-9676, v. 3 less than one hundred percent (100%) of the total principal amount thereof with the understanding that the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board as the purchaser of the Series 2024 Bonds has agreed to forgive $19,350,000 in principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds such that the net principal repayment amount shall be $20,175,000. The Series 2024A Bonds shall not bear interest but shall bear an annual Hardship Grant Assessment Fee instead of interest at a rate not to exceed one and one-half percent (1.5%) per annum. The Series 2024A Bonds are to be issued and sold by the City pursuant to the Resolution, including as part of said Resolution, a Master Trust Indenture (the “Master Indenture”) and a Supplemental Indenture of Trust (the “Supplemental Indenture” and collectively, the “Indenture”) which Indenture was before the Council in substantially final form at the time of the adoption of the Resolution and said Supplemental Indenture is to be executed by the City in such form and with such changes thereto as shall be approved by the City; provided that the principal amount, interest rate or rates, maturity, and discount of the Series 2024A Bonds will not exceed the maximums set forth above. OUTSTANDING BONDS SECURED BY REVENUES Other than the proposed Series 2024A Bonds, the City currently has $564,387,999 of bonds outstanding (the “Outstanding Bonds”) secured by the Revenues (as more fully described in the Indenture). OTHER OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE CITY Additional information regarding the City’s Outstanding Bonds may be found in the City’s financial report (the “Financial Report”) at: https://reporting.auditor.utah.gov/searchreports/s. For additional information, including any information more recent than as of the date of the Financial Report, please contact Marina Scott, City Treasurer, at (801) 535-6565. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST Based on the City’s current plan of finance the estimated cost of the Series 2024A Bonds to be issued under the Bond Act if held until maturity is $27,592,515. A copy of the Resolution and the Indenture are on file in the office of the Salt Lake City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, or, in the event such office is closed for any reason, at 349 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, Utah, where they may be examined during regular business hours of the City Recorder from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of publication of this notice. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice is provided by law during which any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of the Resolution, the Indenture (only as it pertains to the Series 2024A Bonds), or the Series 2024A Bonds, or any provision made for the security and payment of the Series 2024A Bonds, and that after such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality, or legality thereof for any cause whatsoever. DATED this July 2, 2024. 74871-4591-9676, v. 3 /s/ Cindy Lou Trishman City Recorder ********** Section 9. The City hereby reserves the right to opt not to issue the Series 2024A Bonds for any reason, including without limitation, consideration of the opinions expressed at the public hearing. Section 10. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its approval and adoption. Section 11. Upon the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, this Resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until the principal of, premium, if any, and Hardship Assessment Fee on the Series 2024A Bonds are deemed to have been duly discharged in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Indenture. 84871-4591-9676, v. 3 ADOPTED this July 2, 2024. Chair ( S E A L ) Attest and Countersign: City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 94871-4591-9676, v. 3 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or disapproval on July 2, 2024. By: Chair MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this July 2, 2024. By: Mayor 104871-4591-9676, v. 3 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the duly appointed and qualified City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify according to the records of the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) in my official possession that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct excerpt of the minutes of the meeting of the City Council held on July 2, 2024, including a resolution (the “Resolution”) adopted at said meeting as said minutes and Resolution are officially of record in my possession. I further certify that the Resolution, with all exhibits attached, was deposited in my office on July 2, 2024, and pursuant to the Resolution, a Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to Be Issued will be posted no less than fourteen (14) days before the public hearing date as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102: (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) in a public location within the City that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my signature and impressed hereon the official seal of said City, this July 2, 2024. (SEAL) By: City Recorder A-14871-4591-9676, v. 3 EXHIBIT A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I, Cindy Lou Trishman, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the July 2, 2024, public meeting held by the City Council of the City (the “City Council”) as follows: (a) By causing a Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be posted at the principal offices of the City at least twenty four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting; and (b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and (c) By causing a copy of such notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1 to be posted on the City’s official website at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. In addition, the Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council (attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be posted at least annually (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) in a public location within the City that is reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this July 2, 2024. (SEAL) By: City Recorder Attachments: SCHEDULE 1 -- NOTICE OF MEETING SCHEDULE 2 -- ANNUAL MEETING SCHEDULE B-14871-4591-9676, v. 3 EXHIBIT B INDENTURE State of Utah SPENCERJ. COX Governor DEIDRE HENDERSON Lieulenant Governor Department of Environmental Quality Kimberly D. Shelley Executive Director DIVISION OF DRINKING WATER Nathan Lunstad Director Drinking Water Board Kristi Bell, Chair Eric Franson, P.E, Vice-Chair Dawn Ramsey Justin Maughan Corinna Harris Jeff Coombs Shazelle Terry Blake Tullis, PhD. Kimberly D. Shelley Nathan Lunstad Executive Secretary April 10, 2024 Laura Briefer Salt Lake City Water System 1530 S. West Temple Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 Laura.briefer@slcgov.com Subject:Federal SRF Loan Authorization and Procedures for Committal of Funds; Salt Lake City Water System, System #18026, Loan #3F2028 Dear Laura Briefer: On February 29, 2024, the Drinking Water Board (hereinafter called the "Board") authorized a construction loan of up to $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness, for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000 for up to 39 years at 1.5% hardship grant assessment fee in lieu of interest, to Salt Lake City Water System (hereinafter called the "Recipient") for the planning and construction of lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements where large quantities of lead are present (hereinafter called the "Project"). The loan from the Board will be secured by General Obligation bond(s), Non-voted Water Revenue bond(s), or a combination thereof; issued by the Recipient as incremental disbursement bond(s) (hereinafter referred to as Bonds) disbursed on a monthly or quarterly basis. The Board has determined the retirement period for the Bonds to be no more than thirty-nine (39) years, with the assessment fee payable on the unpaid principal from the date of each advance of loan funds. The annual assessment fee is 1.5%. The Board will require annual principal payments on the Bonds, plus assessments, totaling approximately $687,000. Enclosed is the proposed bond repayment schedule. If a revenue bond is used, a debt service reserve fund equal to this annual amount must be established by no more than ten equal annual deposits. The authorized financial assistance will be deposited incrementally into the escrow account mentioned in item 2 along with other funds after the bonding requirements for the loan are completed and the principal forgiveness agreement is signed and fully executed. Special Conditions 195 North 1950 West• Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144830 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830 Telephone (801) 536-4200 • Fax (801) 536-4211 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on I00% recycled paper Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 2 This financial assistance was authorized subject to the availability of funds. The assistance represented by this authorization will be funded, in whole or in part, from the proceeds of a federal DWSRF Capitalization Grant (Section 1452 SOWA) to the State of Utah. Under the SRF Capitalization Grant Program, federal funds are to be made available to the State by way of authorized draws on a letter of credit over the construction period of the Project. Therefore, this authorization is expressly subject to the continued availability of federal funds through the SRF Capitalization Grant and the letter of credit related thereto. Neither the Board nor the State of Utah shall be bound by this authorization or by any obligation to provide further loan funds to or purchase any bonds from the Recipient if the SRF Capitalization Grant funds to which this authorization relates are not awarded or if payments under the letter of credit are withheld for any reason. As a condition of this authorization, the Board will require the Recipient to provide a schedule of estimated engineering and construction time for the Project within ninety (90) days of the date of this letter. If the Project has not progressed sufficiently for the Recipient to issue the Bond within twelve months of the date of authorization, authorized funding may be withdrawn. As a condition of this loan, the Board will require the Recipient to establish a capital facilities replacement reserve account. Deposits to that account shall be made at least annually in the amount of five percent (5%) of the Recipient's annual drinking water system budget, including depreciation, and must continue until the Bonds are redeemed. Failure to maintain the reserve account will constitute a technical default on the Bonds and may result in penalties being assessed. The Bonds may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time in minimum amounts of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof, with the prepayments applied against the Bond principal in inverse order of maturities. In addition, if any Bond proceeds remain after the Project is completed, those remaining proceeds shall be used to redeem Bond principal in inverse order of maturities. The Bond documents must contain the following provisions: i]The Bonds will initially be in the form of a single, fully-registered bond in the amount of $20,175,000 with provisions for incremental advances quarterly, based on a schedule that coincides with the rate at which engineering/construction related costs are expected to be incurred for the Project. However, provisions shall be made which would allow the Bonds to be exchanged for separate serial bonds in minimum denominations of $1,000. ii]If revenue bonds are used the Bonds must be secured by a pledge by the Recipient of 100% of the net revenue produced by the Recipient's water system, and the Recipient will be required to warrant and demonstrate that those net revenues equal or exceed 125% of the total annual debt service requirements on the Bonds and any other obligations secured by a pledge of those revenues. iii]If interest is payable on the Bonds, that interest must be tax-exempt, and delivery of the Bonds must be accompanied by an opinion of recognized bond counsel that the interest is not subject to state or federal income taxes. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 3 iv]If a revenue bond is used, and if the Recipient has previously issued bonds or other obligations secured by a pledge of water system revenues, the Bonds to be purchased by the Board shall be issued on a parity with those prior bonds or obligations with respect to the revenue. If it is not possible for the Bonds to be issued on a parity basis, the Recipient shall contact Michael J. Grange immediately at (801) 674-2563. Based on the information presented to the Board, the following sources of funding will be available for the construction of the Project: Agency Share % of Total Drinking Water Board (Loan)$20,175,000 51% Drinking Water Board (Principal Forgiveness)$19,350,000 49% Local Contribution $0 0% Total Project Cost $39,525,000 100.0% For DWSRF-funded projects the Recipient must submit engineering drawings for any water main replacements or copies of approved waterline installation standards to the Drinking Water Board for review. If the Recipient chooses to use a contractor for any portion of the authorized project, the Recipient must advertise for bids for those portions of the Project, must open the bids, and must demonstrate to the Drinking Water Board that the bidding process complied with Utah bidding laws and that available sources of funding are adequate to cover the cost of the Project and the bond insurance costs. Prior to bond closing the Recipient must make arrangements for all authorized financial assistance proceeds and all other Project funds to be available for deposit into the escrow account described below at the time the Board delivers funds unless other acceptable arrangements have been previously made. The financial assistance is conditioned upon the availability of funds at the time of closing, satisfaction of the conditions specified in this letter, and adherence to the project schedule approved at that time. If the Project does not proceed according to the project schedule, the Board may withdraw project authorization, so that other projects ready to proceed can obtain necessary funding. The Board may consider extensions to the project schedule. Any extension requested must be fully justified. After the Project's construction bids have been opened and the below listed requirements have been met, and if the project remains substantially as approved, loan closing will proceed subject to funds available at that time. But, if substantial changes in the Project are required, they must be considered by the Board for committal of funds. As the Recipient you will need to complete the following items before the Board will purchase your Bonds: I.The State of Utah has appointed William L. Prater, Esq. as special legal counsel to the Board (the "Board's Attorney") and has assigned to him the responsibility of reviewing Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 4 all proceedings and documents relating to the sale of bonds to the Board. His telephone number is (801) 566-8882, email is bill@billprater.com, or mail to P.O. Box 71368, Salt Lake City, Utah 84171. The Recipient's bond counsel shall submit the following items to his office at the times indicated below. A copy of the transmittal letter for the items indicated below must also be sent to the Division of Drinking Water to document project progress. a.No later than one week prior to the meeting at which the Recipient intends to adopt its Resolution for the issuance of the Bonds, a complete copy of the Resolution shall be submitted for review. b.No later than two weeks after the adoption of the Resolution, the following items shall be submitted: 1)A true and complete photocopy of the Resolution as adopted, showing signatures of the appropriate officials of the Recipient on the Resolution and on the Notice of Meeting, Acknowledgment of Notice and Consent, Certificate of Publication, Open Meeting Certificate, and other similar documents relating to the Resolution. 2)A true and complete photocopy of the minutes, notices, resolutions, and other documents relating to the Bonds, showing signatures of the appropriate officials. 3)A complete copy of the proposed documents to be signed at Closing, including (but not necessarily limited to) General Certificate, Signature Identification and Non-Litigation Certificate, Receipt, Arbitrage Certificate (ifrequired), Recipient Attorney's Non-Litigation Certificate, Certificate of Clerk (or Recorder) as to contents of Bond Transcript File, Escrow Agreement, and the Bond Attorney's Opinion. 4)A copy of the water rate structure described in paragraph 3 below of this letter. 5)A copy of the proposed opinion letter of the Recipient's attorney described in paragraph 7 of this letter. The procedures for bond approval will be substantially the same as required by the Utah Local Government Bonding Act as it applies to cities and towns. The opinion of the bond attorney must accompany delivery of the Bonds to the Board before proceeds of the loan will be released. At or after the Closing, the Board's Attorney will bill the Recipient, and the Recipient must pay those legal fees. This is an eligible project expenditure. If the Recipient fails to close the loan after this authorization, it will nonetheless be by billed for the actions taken by the Board's Attorney prior to loan cancellation. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 5 2.Consistent with requirements of the law and the covenants of applicable bond resolutions, the actual payment of funds by the Board to the Recipient will not take place until the Board has assurance the funds will be used for Project costs and the Project will actually be completed. To assure this, all monies to be expended on the Proiect. including the Recipient's share shall be placed in an escrow account supervised by the Recipient and the Board, unless other acceptable arrangements have been made. In general, the Board will make incremental advances into the account on a monthly or quarterly basis. A copy of the proposed escrow agreement shall be submitted to the Board and the Board's Attorney for review. Disbursements from the escrow account will be reviewed and approved by the Division of Drinking Water. A Disbursement Request Form must be completed and submitted along with each request. Disbursement amounts must be authorized in writing by the Recipient and the State prior to any funds being released from the escrow account. Please refer to the reimbursement instruction sheet. 3.At the time of the adoption of the bond resolution, the Recipient shall have passed an ordinance or resolution establishing reasonable water use rates and collection enforcement remedies, taking into account many factors including the need to have sufficient revenue income for all outstanding water system debts, operation and maintenance costs, and any reserve funds. It will then be necessary to implement effective collection procedures. A copy of the rate ordinance and collection enforcement procedures shall be submitted to the Board and the Board's Attorney for review. 4.The Recipient's contract with its engineer shall include the cost of developing the plans and specifications and the construction inspection of the Project. The contract shall be submitted to the Division of Drinking Water for review. (This requirement is to assure the Board that adequate and appropriate arrangements are made for completing and inspecting the project within the guidelines set by the Board.) 5.The project engineer shall submit, in accordance with R309-500, plans and specifications, bidding documents, and general conditions to the Division of Drinking Water for review and Plan Approval prior to soliciting bids on the Project. The engineer shall submit project documents via ddwpnf@utah.gov per https://deq. utah.govldrinking-water/general-plan- approval-process for the expeditious assignment and review of the plans and specifications. Any changes to approved plans and specifications prior to finalizing the Recipient Agreement must be reviewed and approved by the Division of Drinking Water. These funds cannot be disbursed until after the bid opening has occurred and a copy of the bid tabulation has been reviewed by the Division to assure that sufficient funds are authorized to complete the Project. If substantial changes in the Project are required, they must be considered by the Board for committal of additional funds. The following shall be included in the specifications: a.The Recipient shall require contractors hired to perform work on their project to pay prevailing wage rates according to Davis-Bacon labor wage requirements. See attached Reference Page for document location. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 6 b.The Recipient shall comply with the Build America Buy America Act requirements. See attached Reference Page for document location. 6.Rights-of-way and easements for construction, and operation and maintenance of the Project shall be acquired. The Recipient, through its engineer, shall furnish its attorney a right-of-way map showing the location of all sources, buildings, structures, pipelines, and other pertinent facilities not only in the Project but also for the entire water system. The engineer and presiding officer of the Recipient will sign this map and a copy provided to the Recipient's attorney as a basis for the certification described below. 7.The Recipient's attorney shall certify the following items in writing to the Board: a.The Recipient is a legal entity as of the date ofloan closing. b.The Recipient has valid legal title to the rights-of-way designated and shown on the rights-of-way map, including rights-of-way both for the project to be constructed and the remainder of the existing water system as of the date ofloan closing. c.The Recipient has established the ownership of water rights to any and all water used in the system and such rights are summarized with associated water right numbers. d.The bidding process and contract documents for the construction of the Project have the proper and legal format and are in compliance with the Utah Code Annotated 1953 (including, but not limited to Title 34, Chapter 30). e.After the completed and executed construction contract, along with the performance and payment bonds and evidence of necessary insurance, has been reviewed by the Recipient 's attorney, the Recipient 's attorney shall furnish to the Board his legal opinion that all of such items are legal and binding and in compliance with the Utah Code. As indicated earlier, a draft of this letter is to be submitted to the Board and the Board's Attorney two weeks after the adoption of the resolution. 8.If interest is payable on the Bonds, the Bonds must be accompanied by a legal opinion of recognized municipal bond counsel that interest on the bond obligations is exempt from federal income taxation. Unless otherwise covered, the opinion must also include a statement that the project to be constructed with the Bond proceeds is not for private activity and that the Recipient has complied with all the requirements of the Board with respect to the Utah Federal State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program (R309-705 of the Utah Administrative Code). 9.The Recipient must obtain and maintain continuously throughout the loan repayment period, a fidelity bond on the positions handling the Recipient's funds, in an amount at Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 7 least equal to the total amount of funds that will be on hand at any one time, exclusive of loan funds. This amount should be at least twice an annual payment or $1.374.000. This fidelity bond must be obtained and furnished to the Board prior to the loan closing date. The names of the insured on the position fidelity bond will be "Salt Lake City Water System and the State of Utah acting through the Drinking Water Board." 10.As a condition to the acceptance by the Board of a non-voted revenue bond, the issuer must: a.Publish notice and conduct a public hearing consistent with the requirements of the Utah Local Government Bonding Act, and b.Mail notices to System users in the Issuer's service area informing them of that public hearing. In addition to the time and location of the public hearing, the notices which are mailed to System users shall inform System users of the issuer's intent to issue a non-voted revenue bond to the Board, shall describe the face amount of the Bond, the rate of interest, the repayment schedule and shall describe the impact of the Project. User charge rates and connection fees shall be noted in that notice. That notice shall state that System users may respond to the Issuer in writing or in the public hearing. A copy of all written responses and a certified record of a public hearing shall be forwarded to the Board. If the Board feels that there is significant opposition to the proposed project, or if required by the Utah Local Government Bonding Act, it may be necessary for the Issuer to hold a bond election before the Board's funds will be made available. 11.As a condition of this loan, the Board will require the Recipient to complete a Water Conservation Plan. If your system has less than 500 connections, the plan must be submitted to the Division of Drinking Water prior to loan closing. If your system has more than 500 connections, the plan must be submitted to the Division of Water Resources for review and approval, and the approved plan must be adopted (completing the Certification of Adoption) prior to loan closing. If the Recipient has already adopted such a plan, that plan and its certification of adoption may be submitted to the Division of Drinking Water for verification. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 8 12.In compliance with Utah Code Annotated 9-8-404 and 36 CFR 800.3(g), the project engineer shall submit a report to the Division of Drinking Water that demonstrates a reasonable and good faith effort was made to identify and gather information to etermine if cultural resources are present in the area of potential effects, including a Class III Survey. The report format shall meet SHPO State of Utah Archaeological Compliance Guidance. Cultural resource reporting guidance is outlined in the Utah SHPO Short Cultural Resources Inventory Report Form. See attached Reference page for document location. 13.The Recipient must agree to comply with the above Federal laws, executive orders, and government-wide policies that apply to the Project and complete the following: a.Ensure, to the fullest extent possible, that Disadvantaged Business Enterprise procurement requirements are achieved in all procurements for prime contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and others. For your information, refer to these forms for DBE utilization: DBE Contact Log for Bidders, Subcontractor Participation, Performance, and Utilization forms, Suggested Sources for Locating Certified MBE/WBE Contractors in Utah. See attached Reference page for document locations. Ensure that the "six affirmative steps" are taken to assure compliance with the State's "fair share goals" in all procurements. The Division will specify the required language, documents, and instructions. (1)Bid solicitations shall state that this is a federally funded project requiring compliance with the State's "fair share goals" and federal EEO regulations. See attached Reference Page for document location. (2)The "Special Conditions" or "Supplemental Conditions" in the bid documents shall contain the language and instructions specifying the MBE and WBE procurement requirements, provided by the Division. (3)The same bid documents shall also contain the federal EEO requirements. b.Report MBE/WBE utilization for construction services on "EPA Form 5700-52A." See attached Reference Page for document location. This is a requirement for projects that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold set by the Office of Management and Budget. Annual reports are due by October 30th of each year. c.Include the following certification in the bond resolution: "The Issuer agrees, in accepting the proceeds of the Series Bonds, to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations related to the Utah State Revolving Fund administered by the Drinking Water Board These requirements include, but are not limited to, Title XIV of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996, 0MB Circular A-133, the Utah Federal State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program (R309-705 of the Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 9 Utah Administrative Code), the Utah Municipal Bond Act, the Utah Money Management Act, the Utah Procurement Code and the State of Utah Legal Compliance Audit Guide." 14.The Recipient shall submit a cash drawdown schedule prepared and certified by their consulting engineer to be a schedule that coincides with the rate at which expected construction related costs are incurred by the project. 15.The Recipient must get a Unique Entity ID from SAM.gov. Once the entity record has been validated, submit a copy of the Unique Entity ID to the Division of Drinking Water. 16.The Recipient shall comply with the Single Audit Act requirements in accordance with 0MB Circular A-133. 17.The Recipient is required to comply with the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Signage requirements. See attached Reference Page for document location. 18.In compliance with Utah Code Annotated 73-10g-402, water systems applying for federal financial assistance for improvements to capital assets related to water infrastructure shall commit to adopt a capital asset management plan. The Asset Management Plan shall be submitted to the Division for review and approval prior to loan closing, unless preparing an Asset Management Plan is included as part of the project for which the Recipient has applied for financial assistance. In which case, the Asset Management Plan shall be submitted to the Division as soon as it is completed or prior to the entity submitting its final project reimbursement request. To facilitate the timely completion of the financial assistance requirements outlined in this letter, the Recipient and its attorney and engineer shall submit to the Division of Drinking Water all of the items required before loan closing no later than 30 days before the bond closing, and the Recipient's bond attorney shall submit to the Board's Attorney the items listed in subsection "b" of paragraph l on or before the due date specified. These requirements must be completed on or before March 1, 2025. If the Recipient fails to reasonably comply with the Project schedule, the Authorization may be withdrawn in accordance with R309-705-7. Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 10 These requirements may not cover all the matters pertaining to the Project. We anticipate that specific questions on matters relating to your Project will arise, and we are confident that a cooperative effort can resolve any issues. If you have any questions concerning these requirements, please contact Andrea Thurlow at (385) 260-0337, Heather Pattee at (385) 515-1498 or me at (801) 674-2563. Sincerely, DRINKING WATER BOARD Michael J. Grange, P.E. Assistant Executive Secretary MJG/hp/at/lr Enclosures 1.Reference Page 2.Salt Lake City Water System Loan Repayment Schedule cc: William Prater, Esq., William L. Prater, LLC, PO Box 71368, SLC, UT 84171, bill@billprater.com Lisa Tarufelli, Salt Lake City Water System, lisa.tarufelli@slcgov.com Teresa Gray, Salt Lake City Water System, Teresa.Gray@slcgov.com Emma McGowan, Jacobs, emma.mcgowan@jacobs.com Bradley Patterson, Gilmore & Bell, bpatterson@gilmorebell.com Andrea Thurlow, Division of Drinking Water, athurlow@utah.gov Heather Pattee, Division of Drinking Water, hpattee@utah.gov Nagendra Dev, Division of Drinking Water, ndev@utah.gov DDWFinance Laura Briefer, SLC WS April 10, 2024 Page 11 Reference Page *Davis-Bacon labor wage requirements - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking- water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DOW-2022-0005 38.pdf. *American Iron and Steel Provision - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF /DDW-2022-000536.pdf *Build America Buy America Act - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022-004136.pdf *Utah SHPO Short Cultural Resources Inventory Report form - https://documents.deg.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF /DDW-2020- 038201.pdf#page=53 *Disadvantaged Business Enterprise procurement requirements - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022- 000522.pdf *DBE Contact Log for Bidders - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF /DDW-2022-000526.pdf *Subcontractor Participation, Performance, and Utilization forms - https://documents.deg.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022- 000526.pdf *Suggested Sources for Locating Certified MBE/WBE Contractors in Utah - https://documents.deg.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial-assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022- 000532.pdf *Federal EEO regulations - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022-000530.pdf *" EPA Form 5700-52A" - https://documents.deq.utah.gov/drinking-water/financial- assistance/Federal%20SRF/DDW-2022-000524.pdf INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines Law Last Updated: March 2, 2023 . Office of Digital Strategy White House Office, EOP Meena Yi Abbey Pitzer The Bipartisan Infrastructure The CHIPS and Science Act The Inflation Reduction Act The American Rescue Plan Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 2 Guidelines for Logo Applications The purpose of this document is to provide general guidelines for signs displayed at project sites for projects funded under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act), the CHIPS and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, the American Rescue Plan, and other Federally-funded projects as appropriate. The first part of this document pertains to signs for Federally- funded projects that are not installed in the highway right-of- way. For highway signage guidance that is MUTCD compliant please see pages 13 and 14. For all other signs please start here. This document provides information about the Investing In America logo mark as well as how logos, marks and seals of states, cities, and counties can be incorporated into signage. Logos of contractors are not permitted on the signage. When logos are included in signage, the placement should conform to these brand guidelines. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 3 Variations and Usage There is one approved mark associated with the Investing In America logo. To preserve the integrity of the Investing In America logo mark, make sure to apply them correctly. Altering, distorting, or recreating the 'marks' in any way weakens the power of the image and what it represents. Layout and design of signs and communication materials will vary, so care must be taken when applying the logo mark. Primary Logo Mark INVESTING IN AMERICA Colors The colors, graphics, and fonts used should conform to graphic standards. PMS7687 C COLOR ■Blue CMYK 83,48,0,48 RGB 22 / 68 / 132 HEX #164484 PMS ■Red 0, 100, 81, 0 255 / 0 / 49 #FF0031 PMS185 C White 2,2,0,3 242/ 244/ 248 #F2F4F8 Bright White Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 4 Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 5 Logos INVESTING IN AMERICA White background: logo in red and blue INVESTING IN AMERICA Gray background: logo in red and blue Blue background: logo in all white Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 6 Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 s I Investing In America General Guidelines for Logo Applications PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's lSln.[Insert Name of Law]C co <::t 12 fn.481n.""I 71n.3.Sln. t------7----.::C=------ 3, 5 In.7 in. 72 in. 3.Sin.INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 6 Sign Colors 1.The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law INVESTING IN . PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law INVESTING IN l"" AMERICA 0,t; White AMERICA 0 Gray Blue Red Border PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 7 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 . Sign Colors 2.The CHIPS and Science Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's CHIPS and Science Act INVESTING IN AMERICA 0, ..INVESTING IN AMERICA White Gray Blue Red Border 0. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 8 Sign Colors 3.The Inflation Reduction Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act INVESTING IN AMERICA INVESTING IN AMERICA White Gray PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act 0.. Blue Red Border PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 6:2 J......,......0 .INVESTING IN AMERICA 06:J............. -.c,c..-. 2 0 . Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 9 0 .0 2 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 ,,.. Sign Colors 4.The American Rescue Plan PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's American Rescue Plan INVESTING IN AMERICA 0 .i . ,. EJ I, White Gray Blue Red Border INVESTING IN AMERICA Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 10 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] State, City, and County Logo Variations PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA Square or Circular State Logo: 7x7 in. INVESTING IN AMERICA Rectangular or Oval State Logo: not to exceed 17.5 x 7 in. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 11 .. PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA 3 Logo Samples PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA County/City Logo l i .,; '•\- State Logol ''ll2QT Circular City Logo 7 x 7 in. State rectangular logo should not exceed 17.5 x7 in. Rectangular State Logo: not to exceed 17.5 x 7 in. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 12 PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's (Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA J29-T 2 Logo Samples PROJECT FUNDED BY President Joe Biden's [Insert Name of Law] INVESTING IN AMERICA, Circular State Lo o: 7 x 7 in. Rectangular State Logo: not to exceed 17.5 x 7 in. Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 13 Pictograph ----27.9 ------4_.J._a_1---J._4_J.._11_55 J 5.775 ------zs.9----------- -.i------'39.s----------1-4..J.12.ss---- 13'.56 3.37 19 68.88 40.25 ---------------'I ----------------96 ----------------------------M3.37 Rules for Highway Right of Way Signage 8 Feet i i Rules for Highway Right of Way Signage 6 Feet INVESTING IN AMERICA C") --l .l.O... s;f'-¼ State Agency Pictograph USDOT Pictograph lONiri C'1 5.6-->IJ-E--19.04---- --)IE---16.84--•loo-E4 5.16 4-L-7.7645.6 --------20.12 --------21.96-------4..J.._s.4---3.76 I I 3.76-9.76-lk----------52.48--------- a>k-9.76- 5.25l-3-JE--14.25-------27.73 14.25--- 3.76 3.76 12 >1 Investing In America Signage Guidelines I Last Updated: 03/02/23 14 II. ' PROJECT FUNDED BY THE Bipartisan Infrastructure Law j Gilmore Bell DRAFT 05/21/2024 TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AND U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee Dated as of [August] 1, 2024 $39,525,000 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2024A 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS.............................................................................................................2 Section 1.1 Definitions..............................................................................................................2 Section 1.2 Authority for Twelfth Supplemental Indenture......................................................4 ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION, TERMS AND ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2024A BONDS.......4 Section 2.1 Authorization of Bonds, Principal Amount, Designation and Series.....................4 Section 2.2 Finding and Purpose...............................................................................................4 Section 2.3 Advances of Proceeds.............................................................................................5 Section 2.4 Debt Forgiveness....................................................................................................5 Section 2.5 Denominations, Payments, Payment Date, and Hardship Grant Assessment ........5 Section 2.6 Delinquent Payment...............................................................................................7 Section 2.7 Exchange of State Bond .........................................................................................7 Section 2.8 Paying Agent..........................................................................................................7 Section 2.9 Optional Redemption; Redemption Price...............................................................7 Section 2.10 Execution of Series 2024A Bond...........................................................................8 Section 2.11 Delivery of Series 2024A Bonds............................................................................8 ARTICLE III APPLICATION OF SERIES 2024A BOND PROCEEDS AND OTHER MONEYS; ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF ACCOUNTS AND SUBACCOUNTS .................................................................................................8 Section 3.1 Application of Proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds..............................................8 Section 3.2 Series 2024A Project Account................................................................................8 Section 3.3 Establishment of Debt Service Reserve Subaccount..............................................8 Section 3.4 Renewal and Replacement Fund............................................................................9 Section 3.5 Establishment of Series 2024A Project Account....................................................9 Section 3.6 Establishment of Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount ....................................9 ARTICLE IV ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE CITY........9 Section 4.1 Additional Covenants and Representations with Respect to the Series 2024A Bonds ...................................................................................................................9 ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS...................................................................................................9 Section 5.1 Confirmation of Sale of Series 2024A Bonds........................................................9 Section 5.2 System of Registration..........................................................................................10 Section 5.3 Article and Section Headings...............................................................................10 Section 5.4 Partial Invalidity...................................................................................................10 Section 5.5 Counterparts..........................................................................................................10 Section 5.6 Electronic Signatures............................................................................................10 Section 5.7 Effective Date.......................................................................................................10 Section 5.8 Confirmation of Master Indenture........................................................................10 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 5.9 Representation Regarding Ethical Standards for City Officers and Employees and Former City Officers and Employees..........................................................10 EXHIBIT A-1 (FORM OF STATE BOND) ........................................................................... A-1-1 EXHIBIT A-2 (FORM OF EXCHANGE BOND) .................................................................. A-2-1 EXHIBIT B COST OF ISSUANCE DISBURSEMENT REQUEST .........................................B-1 EXHIBIT C FORM OF REQUISITION .....................................................................................C-1 4854-3464-3644, v. 3 TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE THIS TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST INDENTURE (the “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture”), dated as of [August] 1, 2024, between Salt Lake City, Utah, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah (the “City” or “Issuer”), and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as successor in interest to U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association duly organized and qualified under the laws of the United States of America, authorized by law to accept and execute trusts and having an office in Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Trustee”): WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City has entered into a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, as amended and supplemented to the date hereof (the “Master Indenture” and, together with the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, the “Indenture”), with the Trustee; and WHEREAS, the City considers it necessary and desirable and for the benefit of the City and the users of the System (as defined in the Master Indenture) to issue revenue bonds pursuant to the Indenture and as hereinafter provided for the purpose of financing part of the costs of acquiring a project consisting of the acquisition, improvement or extension of water improvements, facilities and property that will be a part of the System pursuant to authority contained in the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended; and WHEREAS in order to (i) finance all or a portion of the costs of construction of improvements to its water system, including, but not limited to lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements and related improvements (collectively, the “Series 2024A Project”), and (ii) finance the costs of issuance of the Bonds herein authorized, the City has determined to issue its Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A in the aggregate principal amount of $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness, for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000 (the “Series 2024A Bonds”); and WHEREAS, the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board (the “Drinking Water Board”) has agreed to purchase the Series 2024A Bonds at par upon the terms and conditions herein set forth; and WHEREAS, the Series 2024A Bonds will be authorized, issued and secured under the Indenture on a parity with all other Bonds issued and outstanding from time to time thereunder; and WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of the Series 2024A Bonds and of this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture have in all respects been duly authorized and all things necessary to make the Series 2024A Bonds, when executed by the City and authenticated by the Trustee, the valid and binding legal obligations of the City and to make this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture a valid and binding agreement have been done; 24854-3464-3644, v. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THIS TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE WITNESSETH: For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and of the purchase of the Series 2024A Bonds by the Bondholders thereof from time to time, and of the acceptance by the Trustee of the trusts hereby created, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the City has executed and delivered this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, and by these presents does confirm the pledge provided for in the Master Indenture and to further secure the payment of the Series 2024A Bonds and all other Bonds now or hereafter Outstanding under the Indenture does hereby sell, assign, transfer, set over and pledge unto U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, its successors and trusts and its assigns forever, all right, title and interest of the City in and to (a) the proceeds of the sale of the Series 2024A Bonds, (b) the Revenues, (c) all moneys held by Trustee in funds and accounts established hereunder, including the investments, if any, thereof (except for any Rebate Fund), and (d) all other rights hereinafter granted for the future securing of such Series 2024A Bonds subject to the permitted applications thereof as provided in the Master Indenture. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME unto the Trustee and its successors and its assigns in trust forever; IN TRUST, NEVERTHELESS, FIRST, for the equal and ratable benefit and security of all present and future Bondholders and Security Instrument Issuers without preference, priority, or distinction as to security or otherwise (except as otherwise specifically provided), of any of the Bonds or Security Instrument Repayment Obligations over any of the others by reason of time of issuance, sale, delivery, maturity or expiration thereof or otherwise for any cause whatsoever; and SECOND, for the equal and proportionate benefit, security and protection of all Reserve Instrument Issuers without preference, priority, or distinction as to lien or otherwise (except as otherwise specifically provided) of any Reserve Instrument Provider over any other Reserve Instrument Provider by reason of time of issuance, delivery or expiration thereof or otherwise for any cause whatsoever. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions. (a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b) of this Section and as the same may be amended hereby, all defined terms contained in the Master Indenture when used in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Master Indenture. (b)As used in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, unless the context shall otherwise require, the following terms shall have the following meanings: “Advance” means an incremental advance to the City of the Series 2024A Bonds by the Drinking Water Board in accordance with this Supplemental Indenture. “Drinking Water Board” means the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board, or any successor thereof. 34854-3464-3644, v. 3 “Hardship Grant Assessment” means the hardship grant assessment fee to be charged in connection with the Series 2024A Bonds pursuant to Section 2.1 hereof. “Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date” means, with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds, each February 1, commencing February 1, 2025. “Issue Date” means, with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds, the original date of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. “Indenture” means the Master Indenture as amended and supplemented by this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and as from time to time hereafter amended and supplemented by Supplemental Indentures. “Master Indenture” means the Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, as heretofore amended and supplemented, between the City and the Trustee, providing for the issuance of public utility revenue bonds. “Outstanding Parity Bonds” means, as of the date of execution and delivery of the Series 2024A Bonds, (i) the Taxable Water and Sewer Bonds, Series 2009; (ii) the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2010; (iii) the Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2011; (iv) Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2012; (v) Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2017; (vi) Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2020; (vii) Public Utilities Revenue Bond (WIFIA Loan), Series 2020B; and (viii) Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2022. “Record Date” means the fifteenth day of the month next preceding any Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date. “Renewal and Replacement Fund Reserve Requirement” means an amount equal to $0. “Repayable Principal Amount” means the maximum principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds payable to the Registered Owner thereof calculated by reducing the purchase price of the Series 2024A Bonds by the debt forgiveness amounts as provided in Section 2.4 and Section 2.5 hereof. “Series 2024A Bonds” means the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A, issued pursuant to this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. “Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount” means the Series Subaccount in the Bond Service Account established in Section 3.5. “Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount” means the Subaccount established in the Debt Service Reserve Account for the Series 2024A Bonds. “Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement” means an amount equal to $745,625. 44854-3464-3644, v. 3 “Series 2024A Project” means improvements to the City’s water system including, but not limited to lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements and related improvements. “Series 2024A Project Account” means the Project Account in the Construction Fund established in Section 3.4. “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture” means this Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of [August] 1, 2024, between the City and the Trustee. The terms “hereby,” “hereof,” “hereto,” “herein,” “hereunder,” and any similar terms as used in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, refer to this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. Section 1.2 Authority for Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. This Twelfth Supplemental Indenture is executed pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Indenture. ARTICLE II AUTHORIZATION, TERMS AND ISSUANCE OF SERIES 2024A BONDS Section 2.1 Authorization of Bonds, Principal Amount, Designation and Series. In order to provide sufficient funds, together with other available moneys of the City, if any, for the (a) financing of the Series 2024A Project and (b) paying all expenses properly incidental thereto and to the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds and in accordance with and subject to the terms, conditions and limitations established in the Indenture, the City’s Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A are hereby authorized to be issued. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be limited to $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000 and shall be issued (i) if issued as a state bond, in the form set forth in Exhibit A-1 (the “State Bond”) and (ii) if issued as an exchange bond, in the form set forth in Exhibit A-2 (the “Exchange Bonds”) in fully registered form. The Series 2024A Bonds shall bear a Hardship Grant Assessment from their Issue Date at the rate of 1.50% per annum on the unpaid principal balance of the Series 2024A Bonds which shall be payable commencing February 1, 2025, until the Series 2024A Bonds are paid in full. If issued as Exchange Bonds, the Series 2024A Bonds shall be in the denomination of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The Series 2024A Bonds shall initially be issued as one fully registered State Bond. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be in such form as to permit the Drinking Water Board to make incremental advances on its total loan commitment to the City during the period of acquisition and construction of the Series 2024A Project and in compliance with Section 2.3 below. Section 2.2 Finding and Purpose. The Series 2024A Bonds are hereby authorized to be issued for the purpose of paying part of the Cost of Construction of the Series 2024A Project pursuant to Section 2.03 of the Master Indenture. Except for the City’s Outstanding Parity Bonds and the Series 2024A Bonds authorized by this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, the City has no outstanding bonds, notes or other obligations issued pursuant to the Indenture. 54854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 2.3 Advances of Proceeds. On or before fifteen (15) days prior to the first day of each calendar quarter beginning prior to the payment by the City of costs of construction of the Series 2024A Project, or at such other time as shall be specified by the Drinking Water Board, the City shall provide to the Drinking Water Board a certificate setting forth a schedule of the costs of construction which the City estimates will become due and payable by the City during the next calendar quarter. Advances made by the Drinking Water Board on the basis of such certificates shall be deposited in the Series 2024A Construction Account. All such advances shall be in the amount of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. Upon receipt of evidence of deposit of each advance in the Series 2024A Construction Account, the [Finance Director of the Department of Public Utilities of the City] shall give telephonic authorization followed by written confirmation to the Drinking Water Board to stamp or write the date and amount of such advance made by the Drinking Water Board in the appropriate place on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount appearing on the State Bond. Each advance made by the Drinking Water Board on the State Bond shall constitute proceeds of the State Bond and shall be deemed to constitute the full purchase price of the corresponding principal amount of the State Bond noted on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount appearing on the State Bond. As advances are made by the Drinking Water Board, they shall be deemed to represent principal payments in the order of their maturity. Section 2.4 Debt Forgiveness. The Drinking Water Board has committed to purchase the Series 2024A Bonds for a purchase price of not to exceed Thirty-Nine Million Five Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($39,525,000). The Drinking Water Board has also agreed to forgive and relieve the City of a maximum amount of Nineteen Million Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($19,350,000) of the maximum Total Principal Sum of the Series 2024A Bonds such that the Repayable Principal Amount of the Series 2024A Bonds shall not exceed Twenty Million One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($20,175,000). [Accordingly, approximately [ ] percent ( %) of each incremental advance pursuant to Section 2.3 hereof shall be forgiven and shall be recorded under the “Debt Forgiveness Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount on the State Bond certificate. The remaining approximately [ ] percent ( %) of each increment advance shall be recorded under the “Repayable Principal Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount and shall constitute the total principal repayment obligation of the City with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds.] Section 2.5 Denominations, Payments, Payment Date, and Hardship Grant Assessment. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be in the denomination of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) or any integral multiple thereof and shall be paid as provided in this Section 2.5. Except as provided in the next succeeding paragraph, principal payments, whether at maturity or by redemption, shall be payable upon presentation of the applicable Series 2024A Bonds at the offices of the Paying Agent for endorsement or surrender, or of any successor Paying Agent. So long as the Drinking Water Board is the Registered Owner of the Series 2024A Bonds, payments on the Series 2024A Bonds shall be made by check or draft without presentation of the Series 2024A Bonds and mailed to the Drinking Water Board as the Registered Owner at the address shown on the registration books maintained by the Registrar. Payment on the Series 64854-3464-3644, v. 3 2024A Bonds shall be made in any coin or currency which on the date of payment is legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be dated as of the Issue Date, and shall be payable in installment payments of Principal on February 1 in the years and in the amounts and shall bear a Hardship Grant Assessment on the principal amount of each Advance beginning on the date of such Advance at the rate of 1.5% per annum. The City shall make a Hardship Grant Assessment only payment (accruing from date of closing) on February 1, 2025. Principal payments are as follows and as further described herein: Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount 2030 $443,000 2048 $578,000 2031 449,000 2049 587,000 2032 456,000 2050 596,000 2033 463,000 2051 605,000 2034 470,000 2052 614,000 2035 477,000 2053 623,000 2036 484,000 2054 633,000 2037 491,000 2055 642,000 2038 498,000 2056 652,000 2039 506,000 2057 661,000 2040 514,000 2058 671,000 2041 521,000 2059 681,000 2042 529,000 2060 692,000 2043 537,000 2061 702,000 2044 545,000 2062 713,000 2045 553,000 2063 723,000 2046 562,000 2064 734,000 2047 570,000 If less than $20,175,000 is advanced on the Series 2024A Bonds, the repayment period shall be shortened and the number of annual principal installments shall be reduced in inverse order of payment (and the amount of the final remaining principal payment shall be reduced, if required) to correspond to the maximum principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds. The Hardship Grant Assessment on Series 2024A Bonds so payable, and punctually paid and duly provided for, on any Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date will be paid to the Registered Owner thereof at the close of business on the Regular Record Date for such Hardship Grant Assessment. Any such Hardship Grant Assessment not so punctually paid or duly provided for shall forthwith cease to be payable to the registered owner of any Series 2024A Bonds on such Regular Record Date and may be paid to the registered owner thereof at the close of business on a Special Record Date for the payment of such defaulted Hardship Grant Assessment to be fixed by the Trustee, notice thereof to be given to such registered owner not less than ten days prior to such Special Record Date. The Hardship Grant Assessment shall be paid by check or draft mailed on each Hardship Grant Assessment Payment Date to the Holder of each of the Series 2024A Bonds as the name and address of such Holder appears on the Record Date in the Register. The Hardship 74854-3464-3644, v. 3 Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds shall be calculated on the basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Section 2.6 Delinquent Payment. Payments of principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds which are delinquent from the due date thereof shall draw interest at the rate of [eighteen percent (18%)] per annum on the delinquent payment from said due date until paid in full. Section 2.7 Exchange of State Bond. As long as the Drinking Water Board is the sole Registered Owner of the Series 2024A Bonds, the Series 2024A Bonds shall be issued only as a State Bond in the form prescribed in Exhibit A-1. It is recognized that the Drinking Water Board may sell or otherwise transfer the Series 2024A Bonds pursuant to the provisions of the State Financing Consolidation Act, Title 63B, Chapter 1b, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, or otherwise. In the event the Drinking Water Board determines to sell or otherwise transfer all or a portion of the Series 2024A Bonds pursuant to the State Financing Consolidation Act, or otherwise, the State Bond shall be exchanged at the office of the Paying Agent for a like aggregate principal amount of Exchange Bonds in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.7. Any Series 2024A Bond, or any portion thereof, which is sold or otherwise transferred or liquidated by the Drinking Water Board pursuant to the State Financing Consolidation Act, or otherwise, shall be in the form of an Exchange Bond prescribed in Exhibit A-2, and shall be executed pursuant to authorization contained in Section 3.04 of the Master Indenture. Each principal payment on the State Bond not previously paid or canceled shall be represented by an equivalent principal amount of Exchange Bonds, in authorized denominations, and of like maturity. The City and its officers shall execute and deliver such documents and perform such acts as may reasonably be required by the City to accomplish the exchange of the State Bond for Exchange Bonds, provided that the Drinking Water Board shall pay or cause to be paid all costs and other charges incident to such exchange and the City shall have no obligation to pay any such costs or charges. Section 2.8 Paying Agent. U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, of Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby appointed the Paying Agent for the Series 2024A Bonds, pursuant and subject to Section 7.02 of the Master Indenture. Principal of the Series 2024A Bonds when due shall be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of the Trustee, or of its successor as Paying Agent. Payment of the Hardship Grant Assessment on Series 2024A Bonds will be made by the Paying Agent pursuant to Section 2.5 herein. Section 2.9 Optional Redemption; Redemption Price. (a) The Series 2024A Bonds may be prepaid at the election of the City, in whole or in part, at any time in minimum amounts of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof, with the prepayments applied against the Principal of the Series 2024A Bonds in inverse order of the payment due dates thereof. (b) The City shall provide notice of redemption as required in Section 4.03 of the Master Indenture, and upon at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of the amount of prepayment and the date scheduled for prepayment to the Drinking Water Board with respect to the State Bonds, and at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid or redeemed to the date of redemption. 84854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 2.10 Execution of Series 2024A Bond. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the Mayor by manual or facsimile signature, and attested and countersigned by the City Recorder by manual or facsimile signature, and the City’s seal shall be affixed or a facsimile thereof shall be imprinted upon the Series 2024A Bonds. The Series 2024A Bonds shall then be delivered to the Trustee and manually authenticated by it. Section 2.11 Delivery of Series 2024A Bonds. The Series 2024A Bonds shall be delivered to the Drinking Water Board, upon compliance with the provisions of Section 3.02 of the Master Indenture. ARTICLE III APPLICATION OF SERIES 2024A BOND PROCEEDS AND OTHER MONEYS; ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF ACCOUNTS AND SUBACCOUNTS Section 3.1 Application of Proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds. The Drinking Water Board shall deposit with the Trustee the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds when advanced pursuant to Section 2.3 herein, and the Trustee shall deposit said proceeds into the Series 2024A Project Account established by Section 3.5 herein and held by the Trustee and upon the Trustee’s receipt of an executed requisition form from the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. At closing, payment of [$ ], which constitutes the first incremental advance of the Series 2024A Bonds shall be deposited in the Series 2024A Project Account within the Construction Fund. Section 3.2 Series 2024A Project Account. Disbursements of moneys in the Series 2024A Project Account shall be made in accordance with the terms of Section 5.03 of the General Indenture. Each requisition from said Series 2024A Project Account shall be approved by a qualified representative of the Drinking Water Board; provided, however, that the costs of issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds shall be paid by the Trustee from the Series 2024A Project Account upon receipt from the City of an executed Cost of Issuance Disbursement Request in substantially the form of Exhibit B attached hereto. Section 3.3 Establishment of Debt Service Reserve Subaccount. There is hereby established for the Series 2024A Bonds the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount. The amount to be deposited from the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds into the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount is $0. The City shall, upon the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds, deposit annually $74,562.50 into the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount until the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement of $745,625 has been met. Amounts deposited in the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount shall be used to pay the principal and Hardship Grant Assessment falling due on the Series 2024A Bonds at any time when there are insufficient funds in the Bond Service Account to pay the same, but pending such use may be invested as provided in the Master Indenture. No further deposits to said Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount need be made unless payments from said Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount have reduced the same below the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement, in which event the City agrees to restore the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Subaccount to the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement in the time and in the manner specified in Section 5.05 of the Master Indenture. In lieu of a separate subaccount as provided 94854-3464-3644, v. 3 herein, the City may use internal notations on its books in order to account for the accumulation and maintenance of the Series 2024A Debt Service Reserve Requirement. Section 3.4 Renewal and Replacement Fund. The amount to be deposited from the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds into the Renewal and Replacement Fund is $-0-. Section 3.5 Establishment of Series 2024A Project Account. There is hereby established a Project Account in the Construction Fund designated as the “Series 2024A Project Account.” Moneys in the Series 2024A Project Account shall be used for the purposes and as authorized by Section 5.03 of the Master Indenture to pay the Cost of Construction of the Series 2024A Project. Section 3.6 Establishment of Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount. Pursuant to Section 5.06(a) of the Master Indenture, there is hereby established a separate Series Subaccount in the Bond Service Account in the Principal and Interest Fund designated as the “Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount.” Moneys shall be deposited into and paid from the Series 2024A Bond Service Subaccount in accordance with Section 5.06 of the Master Indenture to pay Principal of and interest, if any, and the Hardship Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds. ARTICLE IV ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE CITY Section 4.1 Additional Covenants and Representations with Respect to the Series 2024A Bonds. The City hereby covenants, represents, and agrees with the holder of the Series 2024A Bonds issued hereunder the following: (a)The City agrees, in accepting the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds, to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations related to the Utah State Revolving Fund administered by the Drinking Water Board. These requirements include, but are not limited to, Title XIV of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1996, OMB Circular A-133, the Utah Federal State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program (R309-705 of the Utah Administrative Code), the Utah Local Government Bonding Act, the Utah Money Management Act, the Utah Procurement Code and the State of Utah Legal Compliance Audit Guide. (b)The Series 2024A Bonds are issued on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds and comply with the Additional Bonds requirements of the Master Indenture. (c)Each position of the City having custody or control of any of the Revenues or of the proceeds of the Series 2024A Bonds shall be bonded by a responsible corporate surety in an amount not less than twice the annual debt service on the Series 2024A Bonds ($1,374,000). ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS Section 5.1 Confirmation of Sale of Series 2024A Bonds. The sale of the Series 2024A Bonds to the Drinking Water Board at a price of $[39,525,000], is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. 104854-3464-3644, v. 3 Section 5.2 System of Registration. The Indenture shall constitute a system of registration within the meaning and for all purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act, Chapter 7 of Title 15, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended. Section 5.3 Article and Section Headings. The headings or titles of the several articles and sections hereof, and any table of contents appended to copies hereof, shall be solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, construction or effect of this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. Section 5.4 Partial Invalidity. In any one or more of the covenants or agreements, or portions thereof, provided in this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture to be performed shall be contrary to law (other than the provisions of the Indenture limiting the liability of the City to make payments on the Bonds solely from Revenues and other amounts pledged therefor by the Indenture), then such covenant or covenants, such agreement or agreements, or such portions thereof, shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants and agreements or portions thereof and shall in no way affect the validity of this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture or of the Series 2024A Bonds; but the Holders of the Series 2024A Bonds and any other Security Instrument Issuer and any Reserve Instrument Issuer shall retain all the rights and benefits accorded to them under the Act or any other applicable provisions of law. Section 5.5 Counterparts. This Twelfth Supplemental Indenture may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be regarded for all purposes as an original; and such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 5.6 Electronic Signatures Pursuant to the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, Title 46, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, all parties, including the Trustee, have agreed and consented to the use of electronic signatures in connection with all documents executed in connection with the Series 2024A Bonds, including this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture. Section 5.7 Effective Date. This Twelfth Supplemental Indenture shall take effect immediately. Section 5.8 Confirmation of Master Indenture. As supplemented and amended by this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture, and except as provided herein, the Master Indenture is in all respects ratified and confirmed, and the Master Indenture and this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture shall be read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument so that all of the rights, remedies, terms, conditions, covenants and agreements of the Master Indenture shall apply and remain in full force and effect with respect to this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and to any revenues, receipts and moneys to be derived therefrom. Section 5.9 Representation Regarding Ethical Standards for City Officers and Employees and Former City Officers and Employees. The Trustee represents that it has not: (a) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (b) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of 114854-3464-3644, v. 3 securing business; (c) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in the City’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (d) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in the City’s conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code. TWELFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture to be executed by the Mayor (or her designee) and countersigned by the City Recorder, and its official seal to be hereunto affixed and attested by the City Recorder, and to evidence its acceptance of the trusts hereby created, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association has caused this Twelfth Supplemental Indenture to be executed, all as of the date hereof. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH COUNTERSIGN AND ATTEST: By: Mayor By: City Recorder (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By: Trust Officer S-1 A-1-14854-3464-3644, v. 3 EXHIBIT A-1 (FORM OF STATE BOND) Registered Registered UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2024A Number R - 1 $39,525,000 Hardship Grant Assessment Rate Maturity Date Dated Date 1.5%February 1, 2064 [August 29], 2024 Registered Owner: STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, DRINKING WATER BOARD Principal Amount: THIRTY-NINE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS************************** Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), a duly organized and existing municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah, located in Salt Lake County, Utah, acknowledges itself indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay, in the manner and from the source hereinafter provided, to the registered owner identified above, or registered assigns, out of the special fund hereinbelow designated and not otherwise, the Repayable Principal Amount and Debt Forgiveness Amount, set forth in the “Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount” attached hereto (the “Certificate”), but in no event more than a maximum principal amount of $39,525,000, with $19,350,000 in principal forgiveness for a net repayable amount of $20,175,000. [Accordingly, approximately percent ( %) of each incremental advance pursuant to Section of the Supplemental Indenture shall be forgiven and shall be recorded under the “Debt Forgiveness Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount on the Certificate. The remaining approximately percent ( %) of each increment advance shall be recorded under the “Repayable Principal Amount” column on the Certificate of Dates of Payment and Amount and shall constitute the total principal repayment obligation of the City with respect to the Series 2024A Bonds.] The outstanding principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds shall bear a Hardship Grant Assessment [accruing from the Issue Date] at the rate of 1.5% per annum payable beginning February 1, 2025 and thereafter on each on February 1, until the Series 2024A Bonds are paid in full. This Bond, as to principal when due, will be payable at the principal corporate trust operations office of U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota, as paying agent of the City, or its successor as such paying agent; provided, however, that as long as the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Board (the “Drinking A-1-24854-3464-3644, v. 3 Water Board”) is the registered holder of this Bond, installment payments of principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment shall be made without presentation of the Bond by check or draft mailed to the Drinking Water Board as the Registered Owner at the address shown on the registration books maintained by the Registrar. The Hardship Grant Assessment on this Bond shall be payable by check or draft mailed to the Registered Owner hereof at its address as it appears on the registration books of the Paying Agent, who shall also act as the Registrar for the City, or at such other address as is furnished to the Paying Agent in writing by such Registered Owner. The Hardship Grant Assessment hereon shall be deemed to be paid by the Paying Agent when mailed. Both Principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Principal shall be payable in registered installments on February 1 of each of the years as set forth in the following repayment schedule: Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount Maturity Date (February 1) Principal Amount 2030 $443,000 2048 $578,000 2031 449,000 2049 587,000 2032 456,000 2050 596,000 2033 463,000 2051 605,000 2034 470,000 2052 614,000 2035 477,000 2053 623,000 2036 484,000 2054 633,000 2037 491,000 2055 642,000 2038 498,000 2056 652,000 2039 506,000 2057 661,000 2040 514,000 2058 671,000 2041 521,000 2059 681,000 2042 529,000 2060 692,000 2043 537,000 2061 702,000 2044 545,000 2062 713,000 2045 553,000 2063 723,000 2046 562,000 2064 734,000 2047 570,000 If less than $20,175,000 is advanced on the Series 2024A Bonds, the repayment period shall be shortened and the number of annual principal installments shall be reduced in inverse order of payment (and the amount of the final remaining principal payment shall be reduced, if required) to correspond to the maximum principal amount of the Series 2024A Bonds. Payments of principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment on the Series 2024A Bonds which are delinquent from the due date thereof shall draw interest at the rate of [eighteen percent (18%)] per annum on the delinquent payment from said due date until paid in full. This Bond is a special obligation of the City and is one of the public utilities revenue bonds of the City (the “Bonds”) issued under and by virtue of the Act and under and pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, and heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (said trustee and any successor thereto under the Master Indenture being herein referred to A-1-34854-3464-3644, v. 3 as the “Trustee”), as further amended and supplemented by a Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of [August] 1, 2024 (the “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and the Trustee (such Master Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and as hereafter amended and supplemented, being herein referred to as the “Indenture”), for the purposes of (a) paying all or a portion of the costs of construction of improvements to its water system, including, but not limited to lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements and related improvements and (b) paying of all expenses incident thereto and to the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. This Bond is issued on a parity with the Outstanding Parity Bonds (as defined in the Indenture), such that this Bond is secured by an equal lien pledge of the Net Revenues of the City’s System with said Outstanding Parity Bonds. The Bonds are special limited obligations of the City, payable solely from the Net Revenues, moneys, securities, and funds pledged therefor in the Indenture. Neither the credit nor the taxing power of the City, the State or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof is pledged for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the State or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof. The issuance of the Bonds shall not directly, indirectly, or contingently obligate the City or the State or any agency, instrumentality, or political subdivision thereof to levy any form of taxation therefor or to make any appropriation for the payment of the Bonds. THE CITY IS OBLIGATED TO PAY PRINCIPAL, INTEREST, IF ANY, AND THE HARDSHIP GRANT ASSESSMENT ON THIS BOND SOLELY FROM THE REVENUES (AFTER PAYMENT OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS) AND OTHER FUNDS OF THE CITY PLEDGED THEREFOR UNDER THE TERMS OF THE INDENTURE (AS DEFINED BELOW). THIS BOND IS NOT A DEBT OF THE CITY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ANY CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF INDEBTEDNESS OR PROVISIONS THEREFOR. PURSUANT TO THE INDENTURE, SUFFICIENT REVENUES HAVE BEEN PLEDGED AND WILL BE SET ASIDE INTO SPECIAL FUNDS BY THE CITY TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROMPT PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THIS BOND AND ALL BONDS OF THE SERIES OF WHICH IT IS A PART. This Bond is one of a Series of Bonds designated as “Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A” (the “Series 2024A Bonds”), limited to the aggregate principal amount of 39,525,000, dated as of the dated date identified above, and duly issued under and by virtue of the Act and under and pursuant to the Indenture and a Resolution of the City Council of the City adopted on [July 2], 2024. Copies of the Indenture are on file at the office of the City Recorder in Salt Lake City, Utah, and at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, in Salt Lake City, Utah, and reference to the Indenture and the Act is made for a description of the pledge and covenants securing the Series 2024A Bonds, the nature, manner and extent of enforcement of such pledge and covenants, the terms and conditions upon which the Series 2024A Bonds are issued and additional Bonds may be issued thereunder, and a statement of the rights, duties, immunities and obligations of the City and of the Trustee. Such pledge and other obligations of the City under the Indenture may be discharged at or prior to the maturity or redemption of the Series 2024A A-1-44854-3464-3644, v. 3 Bonds upon the making of provision for the payment thereof on the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture. Pursuant to the Indenture, the definition of the System is subject to including additional systems of the City by Supplemental Indenture, without the consent of the holders of Outstanding Bonds. This Bond and the issue of Bonds of which it is a part are issued in conformity with and after full compliance with the Constitution of the State of Utah and pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Chapter 14 of Title 11, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), and all other laws applicable thereto. As provided in the Indenture, Bonds may be issued from time to time in one or more series in various principal amounts, may mature at different times, may bear interest at different rates, and may otherwise vary as provided in the Indenture, and the aggregate principal amount of Bonds which may be issued is not limited. All Bonds issued and to be issued under the Indenture are and will be equally and ratably secured by the pledge and covenants made therein, except as otherwise expressly provided or permitted in or pursuant to the Indenture. To the extent and in the respects permitted by the Indenture, the Indenture may be modified, supplemented or amended by action on behalf of the City taken in the manner and subject to the conditions and exceptions prescribed in the Indenture. The holder or owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Indenture or to institute action to enforce the pledge or covenants made therein or to take any action with respect to an event of default under the Indenture or to institute, appear in, or defend any suit or other proceeding with respect thereto, except as provided in the Indenture. This Bond is transferable, as provided in the Indenture, only upon the books of the City kept for that purpose at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Trustee, duly executed by the registered owner or such duly authorized attorney, and thereupon the City shall issue in the name of the transferee a new registered Bond or Bonds of the same aggregate principal amount and series, designation, maturity and interest rate as the surrendered Bond, all as provided in the Indenture and upon the payment of the charges therein prescribed. The City and the Trustee may treat and consider the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the holder and absolute owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal hereof and interest due hereon and for all other purposes whatsoever. This Bond is subject to prepayment and redemption at any time, in whole or in part (if in part, in integral multiples of $1,000), at the election of the City in inverse order of the due date of the principal installments hereof and if less than all Bonds of a particular due date are to be redeemed, in such manner as the Trustee shall deem fair and appropriate, upon notice given as set forth in the Indenture, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount to be so prepaid. The Series 2024A Bonds are issuable solely in the form of fully registered Bonds, without coupons, in the denomination of $1,000, or any integral multiple of $1,000. A-1-54854-3464-3644, v. 3 Except as otherwise provided herein and unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, words and phrases used herein shall have the same meanings as such words and phrases in the Indenture. It is hereby certified and recited that all conditions, acts and things required by the Constitution or statutes of the State of Utah or by the Act, or the Indenture to exist, to have happened or to have been performed precedent to or in the issuance of this Bond exist, have happened and have been performed and that the issue of Bonds, together with all other indebtedness of the City, is within every debt and other limit prescribed by said Constitution and statutes. This Bond shall not be valid until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been signed by the Trustee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, has caused this Bond to be signed in its name and on its behalf by the signature of its Mayor (or her designee), and its corporate seal to be impressed or imprinted hereon, and attested and countersigned by the signature of its City Recorder (the signatures of said Mayor and City Recorder being by facsimile or manual signature), all as of the dated date specified above. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH (SEAL) ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: By Mayor By City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: By City Attorney A-1-64854-3464-3644, v. 3 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Indenture and is one of the Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A of Salt Lake City, Utah. U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By: (Manual Signature) Authorized Officer Date of Authentication: [August ], 2024. A-1-74854-3464-3644, v. 3 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE (No writing to be placed herein except by the Bond Registrar) Date of Registration Name of Registered Owner Signature of Bond Registrar State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board A-1-84854-3464-3644, v. 3 CERTIFICATE OF DATES OF PAYMENT AND AMOUNT The undersigned authorized representative of the State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Drinking Water Board (the “Board”), hereby certifies that the Board has received written authorization from the [Finance Director of the Department of Public Utilities] of the City to stamp or write the amount or amounts indicated below on the date or dates set forth opposite such amount(s); that the amount last inserted under the column “Total Principal Sum” is the total amount received by the City for the issuance of this Bond, and that the undersigned has placed his/her signature in the space provided opposite such amount(s) to evidence the same. A copy of this certificate shall be forwarded to the Trustee (U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association) pursuant to the requirement in [Section 2.3] of the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated as of [August] 1, 2024. Amount of Payment Date of Payment [Debt Forgiveness Amount] Repayable Principal Amount Total Principal Sum Board Representative Signature $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ $ $$$ A-2-1 EXHIBIT A-2 (FORM OF EXCHANGE BOND) Registered Registered UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2024A Number R - $ Hardship Grant Assessment Rate Maturity Date Issue Date %February 1, 20 , 20 Registered Owner: Principal Amount: AND NO/100 DOLLARS Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), a duly organized and existing municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah, located in Salt Lake County, Utah, acknowledges itself indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay, but solely in the manner and from the revenues and sources hereinafter provided, to the Registered Owner identified above or its registered assigns, on the Maturity Date specified above, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the Principal Amount identified above. The Hardship Grant Assessment on the Principal Amount shall be payable by check or draft mailed by U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (the “Paying Agent”) to the Registered Owner hereof on each February 1. Principal and redemption price of this Bond shall be payable upon presentation of this Bond to the Paying Agent, for payment at maturity. If any installment payment of Bond principal and the Hardship Grant Assessment is not paid when due and payable, the City shall pay the Hardship Grant Assessment at the rate of [eighteen percent (18%)] per annum on the delinquent installment from said due date until paid. All payments shall be made in any coin or currency which on the date of payment is legal tender for the payment of debts due the United States of America. This Bond is one of an authorized issue of bonds of like date, term and effect except as to maturity, in the aggregate principal amount of Dollars ($ ), issued in exchange for the conversion of the City’s $39,525,000 Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A, issued under and by virtue of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended (the “Act”), and under and pursuant to a Master Trust Indenture, dated as of January 1, 2004, and heretofore amended and supplemented (the “Master Indenture”), between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (said trustee and any successor thereto under the Master Indenture being herein referred to as the “Trustee”), as further amended and supplemented by a Twelfth Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated as of [August] 1, 2024 (the “Twelfth Supplemental Indenture”), between the City and the Trustee (such Master Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture and as hereafter amended and A-1-24854-3464-3644, v. 3 supplemented, being herein referred to as the “Indenture”), for the purposes of (a) paying all or a portion of the costs of construction of improvements to its water system, including, but not limited to the [planning and construction of lead service line inventory and replacements as well as potential replacement of aging water mains to facilitate service line replacements] and related improvements and (b) paying of all expenses incident thereto and to the issuance of the Series 2024A Bonds. This Bond is a special, limited obligation of the City payable solely from the Net Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) of the System and does not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any state constitutional or statutory limitation. In no event shall this Bond be deemed or construed to be a general obligation indebtedness of the City or payable from any funds of the City other than the Revenues of the System. As provided in the Indenture, bonds, notes and other obligations may be issued from time to time in one or more series in various principal amounts, may mature at different times, may bear Hardship Grant Assessments or interest at different rates and may otherwise vary as provided in the Indenture, and the aggregate principal amount of such bonds, notes and other obligations which may be issued is not limited. This Bond and all other bonds, notes and other obligations issued and to be issued under the Indenture on a parity with this Bond are and will be equally and ratably secured by the pledge and covenants made therein, except as otherwise expressly provided or permitted in or pursuant to the Indenture. The issuance of this Bond shall not, directly, indirectly or contingently, obligate the City or any agency, instrumentality or political subdivision thereof to levy any form of taxation therefor or to make any appropriation for its payment. The Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity at any time, in whole or in part (if in part, in integral multiples of $1,000), at the election of the City in inverse order of maturity (if less than all of the Bonds maturing on any single date are called for redemption, the Trustee shall select the Bonds to be redeemed, from the Outstanding Bonds maturing on that date not previously called for redemption, in such manner as in the Trustee’s sole discretion it shall deem appropriate and fair) upon not less than thirty (30) days’ nor more than forty-five (45) days’ prior notice, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of each Bond to be redeemed. Notice of redemption shall be mailed by the City, postage prepaid, to the registered owners of said Bonds addressed to such owners at their address appearing on the registration books maintained by the City. Subject to the provisions of the Indenture, the Series 2024A Bonds are issuable in fully registered form, without coupons, in denomination equal to the principal amount of the bonds or, upon exchange, in the denomination of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof. The City covenants and agrees that it will fix rates for service to customers of the System sufficient to pay this Bond when due, and principal and the Hardship Grant Assessments on all bonds and Bonds issued on a priority to or parity with this Bond, if any, as the same fall due, provided such rates must be reasonable rates for the type, kind and character of the service rendered, and will collect and account for the Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) to be received for such service, and will set aside one hundred percent (100%) of the Net Revenues of the System A-1-34854-3464-3644, v. 3 (as defined in the Indenture) to pay this Bond according to the payment terms hereinabove set forth and the principal and Hardship Grant Assessments on all bonds and notes issued on a parity with this Bond, if any. To the extent and in the respects permitted by the Indenture, the Indenture may be modified or amended by action on behalf of the City taken in the manner and subject to the conditions and exceptions prescribed in the Indenture. The Registered Owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Indenture or to institute action to enforce the pledge or covenants made therein or to take any action with respect to an event of default under the Indenture or to institute, appear in, or defend any suit or other proceeding with respect thereto, except as provided in the Indenture. This Bond is transferable by the registered holder hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing at the office of the Trustee (the “Registrar”) but only in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon payment of the charges provided in the Indenture and upon surrender and cancellation of this Bond. Upon such transfer a new registered Bond or Bonds of the same series and the same maturity and of authorized denomination or denominations for the same aggregate principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor. It is hereby certified, recited and declared that all conditions, acts and things essential to the validity of this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part do exist, have happened and have been done, and that every requirement of law affecting the issue hereof has been duly complied with; that this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part does not exceed any limitation prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the State of Utah; that one hundred percent (100%) of the Net Revenues to be derived from the operation of the System, including any future improvements, additions and extensions thereto, have been pledged and will be set aside into said special fund by the City to be used for the payment of this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part, and all bonds and notes issued on a parity with this Bond, if any, and that said Net Revenues of the System are not pledged, hypothecated or anticipated in any way other than by the issue of Series 2024A Bonds of which this Bond is one and all bonds and notes issued on a parity with this Bond, if any. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Indenture until the Certificate of Authentication on this Bond shall have been manually signed by the Trustee. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH COUNTERSIGN AND ATTEST: By: Mayor By: City Recorder B-1 EXHIBIT B COST OF ISSUANCE DISBURSEMENT REQUEST U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 170 South Main, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Twelfth Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of [August 1], 2024, you are hereby authorized to pay to the following costs of issuance from the Series 2024A Project Account: [See Attached Schedule] SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Authorized Representative Form of Schedule COSTS OF ISSUANCE Payee Purpose Amount C-1 EXHIBIT C FORM OF REQUISITION Re: Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024A in the sum of $ U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association 170 South Main, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 You are hereby authorized to disburse from the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund with regard to the above-referenced bond issue the following: REQUISITION NUMBER: NAME AND ADDRESS OF PAYEE: AMOUNT: $ PURPOSE FOR WHICH EXPENSE HAS BEEN INCURRED: Each obligation, item of cost, or expense mentioned herein has been properly incurred, is a proper charge against the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund based upon audited, itemized claims substantiated in support thereof (evidence of such support not herein required by the Trustee), is justly due and owing and constitutes a Cost of a Project and has not been the basis for a previous withdrawal. The amount remaining in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund after such disbursement is made, together with the amount of unencumbered Net Revenues, if any, which the City reasonably estimates will be deposited in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund during the period of construction of the Project from the investment of moneys on deposit in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund, will, together with any other moneys lawfully available or expected to be lawfully available for payment of the Cost of the Project and after payment of the amount requested in said requisition, be sufficient to pay the Cost of Completion for the Project in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor then in effect; it being understood that no moneys from the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund may be expended unless, after giving effect thereto, the funds remaining in the Series 2024A Account of the Construction Fund, together with such other funds and income and lawfully available moneys, are sufficient to pay the Cost of Completion for the Project. C-24854-3464-3644, v. 3 DATED: By: Its: STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DRINKING WATER BOARD By: Its: Assistant Executive Secretary Salt Lake City PROPOSED BOND REPAYMENT SCHEDULE 51 % Loan & 49 % P.F. PRINCIPAL $20,175,000.00 ANTICIPATED CLOSING DATE February 1, 2024 HARDSHIP GRANT ASSESSMENT FEE 1.50%FIRST P&I PAYMENT DUE February 1, 2025 TERM 39 REVENUE BOND $20,175,000 NOMIN. PAYMENT $687,052.16 PRINC. FORGIVE.:$19,350,000.00 BEGINNING YEAR BALANCE DATE OF PAYMENT PAYMENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST ENDING BALANCE PAYM NO. =========== ==================== ================ ================ = ================== ================== ================= ===== 2025 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2025 $302,625.00 *$0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 0 2026 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2026 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 1 2027 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2027 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 2 2028 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2028 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 3 2029 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2029 $302,625.00 $0.00 $302,625.00 $20,175,000.00 4 2030 $20,175,000.00 February 1, 2030 $745,625.00 $443,000.00 $302,625.00 $19,732,000.00 5 2031 $19,732,000.00 February 1, 2031 $744,980.00 $449,000.00 $295,980.00 $19,283,000.00 6 2032 $19,283,000.00 February 1, 2032 $745,245.00 $456,000.00 $289,245.00 $18,827,000.00 7 2033 $18,827,000.00 February 1, 2033 $745,405.00 $463,000.00 $282,405.00 $18,364,000.00 8 2034 $18,364,000.00 February 1, 2034 $745,460.00 $470,000.00 $275,460.00 $17,894,000.00 9 2035 $17,894,000.00 February 1, 2035 $745,410.00 $477,000.00 $268,410.00 $17,417,000.00 10 2036 $17,417,000.00 February 1, 2036 $745,255.00 $484,000.00 $261,255.00 $16,933,000.00 11 2037 $16,933,000.00 February 1, 2037 $744,995.00 $491,000.00 $253,995.00 $16,442,000.00 12 2038 $16,442,000.00 February 1, 2038 $744,630.00 $498,000.00 $246,630.00 $15,944,000.00 13 2039 $15,944,000.00 February 1, 2039 $745,160.00 $506,000.00 $239,160.00 $15,438,000.00 14 2040 $15,438,000.00 February 1, 2040 $745,570.00 $514,000.00 $231,570.00 $14,924,000.00 15 2041 $14,924,000.00 February 1, 2041 $744,860.00 $521,000.00 $223,860.00 $14,403,000.00 16 2042 $14,403,000.00 February 1, 2042 $745,045.00 $529,000.00 $216,045.00 $13,874,000.00 17 2043 $13,874,000.00 February 1, 2043 $745,110.00 $537,000.00 $208,110.00 $13,337,000.00 18 2044 $13,337,000.00 February 1, 2044 $745,055.00 $545,000.00 $200,055.00 $12,792,000.00 19 2045 $12,792,000.00 February 1, 2045 $744,880.00 $553,000.00 $191,880.00 $12,239,000.00 20 2046 $12,239,000.00 February 1, 2046 $745,585.00 $562,000.00 $183,585.00 $11,677,000.00 21 2047 $11,677,000.00 February 1, 2047 $745,155.00 $570,000.00 $175,155.00 $11,107,000.00 22 2048 $11,107,000.00 February 1, 2048 $744,605.00 $578,000.00 $166,605.00 $10,529,000.00 23 2049 $10,529,000.00 February 1, 2049 $744,935.00 $587,000.00 $157,935.00 $9,942,000.00 24 2050 $9,942,000.00 February 1, 2050 $745,130.00 $596,000.00 $149,130.00 $9,346,000.00 25 2051 $9,346,000.00 February 1, 2051 $745,190.00 $605,000.00 $140,190.00 $8,741,000.00 26 2052 $8,741,000.00 February 1, 2052 $745,115.00 $614,000.00 $131,115.00 $8,127,000.00 27 2053 $8,127,000.00 February 1, 2053 $744,905.00 $623,000.00 $121,905.00 $7,504,000.00 28 2054 $7,504,000.00 February 1, 2054 $745,560.00 $633,000.00 $112,560.00 $6,871,000.00 29 2055 $6,871,000.00 February 1, 2055 $745,065.00 $642,000.00 $103,065.00 $6,229,000.00 30 2056 $6,229,000.00 February 1, 2056 $745,435.00 $652,000.00 $93,435.00 $5,577,000.00 31 2057 $5,577,000.00 February 1, 2057 $744,655.00 $661,000.00 $83,655.00 $4,916,000.00 32 2058 $4,916,000.00 February 1, 2058 $744,740.00 $671,000.00 $73,740.00 $4,245,000.00 33 2059 $4,245,000.00 February 1, 2059 $744,675.00 $681,000.00 $63,675.00 $3,564,000.00 34 2060 $3,564,000.00 February 1, 2060 $745,460.00 $692,000.00 $53,460.00 $2,872,000.00 35 2061 $2,872,000.00 February 1, 2061 $745,080.00 $702,000.00 $43,080.00 $2,170,000.00 36 2062 $2,170,000.00 February 1, 2062 $745,550.00 $713,000.00 $32,550.00 $1,457,000.00 37 2063 $1,457,000.00 February 1, 2063 $744,855.00 $723,000.00 $21,855.00 $734,000.00 38 2064 $734,000.00 February 1, 2064 $745,010.00 $734,000.00 $11,010.00 $0.00 39 *Interest Only Payment $27,592,515.00 $20,175,000.00 $7,417,515.00 MAY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JUNE S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 JULY S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AUGUST S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 DRAFT Legend BC:Bond/ Disclosure Counsel - Gilmore & Bell, P.C. (Brad Patterson) CA:City Attorney: () CC:City Council - Salt Lake City CO:City Officials: (Mary Beth Thompson and Russ Sundquist) CR:City Recorder's Office: (Cindy Lou Trishman) CT:City Treasurer's Office: (Marina Scott) DDW Division of Drinking Water (Andrea Thurlow and Heather Pattee) DWB:Drinking Water Board (Michael J. Grange) DWBA:Drinking Water Board Attorney (William L. Prater, Esq.) MA:Municipal Advisor - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (John Crandall and Elizabeth Read) M:Mayor: (Erin Mendenhall) PU:Public Utilities Office: (Laura Briefer, Lisa Tarufelli and Teresa Gray) T:Trustee - US Bank (Laurel Bailey) *Preliminary; Subject to Change Calendar of Bonding Events $20,175,000* Salt Lake City, Utah Public Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2024 (Drinking Water Board SRF Loan) May 9, 2024 DATE EVENT STATUS PARTICIPANTS February 29 Drinking Water Board authorized construction loan.DWB May 13 Bond Counsel prepares and distributes initial drafts of the Indenture and Parameters Resolution.BC May 21 Council Transmittal Packets (including Form of Parameters Resolution and Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds To Be Issued as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code) due to Mayor's Office for June 11 briefing. PU, BC June 11 Regular City Council Meeting: Bond transaction briefing.CC, PU, MA Council Transmittal Packets due to Mayor's Office for July 2 adoption of Parameters Resolution (approving previously circulated documents).PU, BC June 19 Market Holiday: Juneteenth National Independence Day.- July 2 Regular City Council Meeting: Council adopts Bond Parameters Resolution and sets the date of August 13 for Public Hearing.CC, PU, MA July 3 City Recorder posts “Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds To Be Issued as a Class A notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code” . (30-day contest period begins)BC, CR July 4 Holiday: Independence Day.- July 8 City mails out notices monthly billing notices per State requirements.PU August 2 End of 30-day contest period.- August 13 Regular City Council Meeting: Public Hearing on bond issue.CC, PU, MA August 20 Distribution of closing documents.BC August 28 City executes and delivers all documentation to Bond Counsel prior to closing.M, CC, PU August 29 Bond Closing. Delivery of the bond proceeds to the City.ALL COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: July 2, 2024 RE:Text Amendment: Sports, Entertainment, Cultural, and Convention District Text Amendments PLNPCM2024-00441 PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: July 2, 2024 Set Date: July 2, 2024 Public Hearing: August 13, 2024 Potential Action: August 13 or 20 ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will receive a briefing on a proposed ordinance that would amend the D4 Secondary Central Business District (D4) zoning district to support the creation of a Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention district. This proposal was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall in response to SB 272 Capitol City Revitalization Act, which established the process and timeline for creating a revitalization district centered around the Delta Center and Convention Center Blocks of Downtown Salt Lake City. The proposed text amendments would make the following changes to the D4 zoning district: 1. Modify the maximum height allowed through design review from 125 feet to 600 feet. • The height provisions that apply to a portion of block 67 would also be removed because they would no longer be necessary if the maximum height is removed. 2. Modify the required front and corner yard setback requirements to clarify that buildings with plazas and other similar public spaces are allowed to exceed the maximum setback. • Change the table of allowed uses for the D4 zoning district would change as follows: •Stadiums change from conditional use to a permitted use. •Commercial parking would be changed from conditional use to a permitted use. (A current requirement prohibiting the demolition of a building for principal use parking on the property would remain.) 3. Expand the existing sign overlay that applies to the Delta Center block to the blocks that contain the Salt Palace. This allows more flexibility for signs related to the entertainment venues within the Page | 2 overlay and allows modifications to signs through the design review process for buildings that are subject to design review. This briefing will be held in conjunction with the Council’s discussion about the proposed participation agreement which is on the agenda for potential adoption during the July 2 formal meeting. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Division recommended the Planning Commission adopt the proposed amendments. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 12, 2024, and forwarded a negative recommendation. They included the following reasons for their negative recommendation: •Does not comport with the downtown master plan •Does not comport with existing purpose of the zone •Do not have enough info about community benefits •Do not like the timeline of the process Additionally, the Commission recommended the Council consider the following: •Abravanel Hall be kept at its present site, and include a modest renovation with sales tax •Buffer around Japantown (Japanese Church of Christ, adjacent garden and Buddhist Temple) to minimize impact on historic structures. POLICY QUESTIONS •As noted below, there are two active petitions that relate to sign overlay districts for the County owned Salt Palace blocks. o Does the Council wish to provide directions on which sign overlay standards they prefer to move forward with, the County or City initiated petition? •In the discussion about increased building height, Planning staff suggested the Planning Commission could consider the following options to help mitigate impact from the increased height. These options could be addressed in a development agreement if the Council is interested in pursuing them. ▪Apply an increased setback from certain buildings, such as the Japanese Church of Christ ▪Require landscaped buffers that match the width of the existing garden on 100 South o The Council may wish to discuss these recommendations or other potential standards with Planning staff to determine if they would like to include changes in the final draft of the ordinance. •Planning staff recommended standards for electronic signs be considered that may help mitigate the impact on residential properties. These standards may include dimming and prohibiting animation between the hours of 11:00 PM and 7:00 AM for signs that directly face residential uses. (Page 9, Planning Commission Staff report) o Does the Council wish to discuss these types of conditions with Planning Staff? Page | 3 D4 Zoning Map page 10 of the Planning Commission Staff report ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Sign Overlay Petitions In March 2023 Salt Lake County initiated a petition that would create a sign overlay as it applies to the Salt Palace Convention Center (PLNPCM2023-00154). The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed sign overlay for the Salt Palace. However, they recommended excluding the Abravanel Hall and UMOCA properties from the overlay. The City initiated petition currently includes these properties in the proposed overlay district. This proposal could be considered less permissive than the sign overlay the Delta Center Block currently has. The proposal would include the following standards: •awning canopy signs limited to 3 square feet per linear foot of building face; 75 square feet maximum. •Flat Sign (Storefront Orientation) limited to one per building entry •Flat Sign Display, Electronic Changeable Copy may not be larger than 1400 square feet per sign •Monument Signs limited to 1 square foot per linear foot of street frontage and no more than 5 per city block •Parking Entrance Blade Sign (Projecting Parking Entry Sign) limited to 16 square feet per side; 32 square feet total with the noted location limitations Page | 4 •Special Event Sign may not cover more than 40% of the building. The Planning Commission forwarded a favorable recommendation with following conditions for Council to consider •UMOCA and Abravanel Hall be removed from the overlay; and •The City Council carefully considers limitations and regulations around illumination of signs, projecting signs and displays, LCD displays and projected images. Key Considerations Pages 4-8 of the Planning Commission staff report outline four key considerations. Below is a short summary of each issue. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for full analysis. 1. Building Height •The proposal would modify the maximum height allowed through design review from 125 feet to 600 feet. •Lots of public feedback was focused on how additional height would impact existing buildings such as the Japanese Church of Christ, Buddhist Temple and County owned properties such as Abravanel Hall and the Museum of Contemporary Art (UMOCA) •Planning noted zoning regulation can be used to reduce the impact to adjacent properties. This may include limiting building height, increasing setbacks, including spacing of towers when they exceed a certain height, and other similar regulations. 2. Changing Heliports from a Conditional Use to a Permitted Use •The original request included making heliports a permitted use. Based on input received, this has been dropped from the proposal. 3. Sign Regulations Consideration •The proposal would expand the arena sign overlay to the Salt Palace blocks and could result in more nighttime light emission that could impact some adjacent and nearby land uses, such as light trespass into residential uses, flashing lights, and other similar impacts created by digital signs. •The applicant for the district authorized under SB272 (Smith Entertainment Group) has indicated they would like to allow off premise advertising within the district. ▪A change like this would require the city to modify the current prohibition on new billboards within the city. ▪It would be a major policy change for the city. Therefore, the proposal is focused on “on-premise” advertising. •As noted above, in March 2023 Salt Lake County initiated a petition that would create a sign overlay as it applies to the Salt Palace Convention Center. Please see the section above for more detailed information. 4. Benefits of proposed text amendment •Planning staff outline how the surrounding blocks with the D4 zoning designation may be impacted by the changes to the D4 zone. Ultimately, the proposal could lead to many changes on these blocks that could help facilitate and support a sports, entertainment, culture and convention district. Page | 5 5. Public Input. •Many of the public comments expressed concern and support for the preservation of Abravanel Hall, the proposed sales tax increase and using public money for professional sports. Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Planning Commission June 12, 2024 PLNPCM2024-00441 SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, CULTURAL, AND CONVENTION DISTRICT CODE CHANGES Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning WHERE IS THE D4 ZONE? •D1 zone •No height limit •Extends to 300 West on South Temple •Extends to 200 West at 200 South and 400 South •Recently expanded to west side of 200 West at 500 South. Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning CURRENT ALLOWED HEIGHT Orange: 125 feet Blue: 180 feet Yellow: 375 feet Red: no limit Design review: Orange and yellow: 75 feet Blue: 90 feet Red: 200 feet 375 feet No Limit 125 feet No Limit 180 feet Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ISSUES •Height •Opposed to height •Blocking views •Shadows from tall buildings •Heliports •Will remain conditional use •Signs •Light impacts Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PROPOSED HEIGHT Initial proposal: •No maximum height •Design review above 75 feet Modified proposal •Permitted height: 75 feet •600 feet: with design review •Lower than D1, higher than other parts of downtown Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning HEIGHT IMPACTS Downtown plan defines view corridors •Public views, not private views Shadows: •Provides shade from heat •Colder in winter Historic Buildings •No locally protected buildings in D4 •May consider: •Increased setbacks •Stepbacks at certain heights •Design review includes impact standards Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning LAND USE CHANGES •Parking (commercial): change to permitted •Stadium: change to permitted •Proposal has changed: •Heliports stay conditional •Off site parking: already permitted Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SIGN REGULATIONS •Extend Arena Overlay to Salt Palace blocks •D1 and D4 have same sign regulations, no changes proposed Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SIGN REGULATIONS •Overlay allows different types and sizes of signs Flat Sign: Building Orientation 1 per building face 5 square feet for every foot of building frontage Flat Sign: Storefront Orientation 3 per storefront 2 square feet per linear foot of storefront Roof Sign 20 feet above roofline 5 square feet per building frontage One per building Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SIGN REGULATIONS Freestanding Electronic Changeable Copy Signs 45 feet in height (includes structure) 1600 square feet max 2 per city block No off site advertising Special Event Signs 60% of building façade 1 per street frontage Window Sign 90% of window area Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning DOWNTOWN PLAN •High Rise Core (CBD): •Grow to the south and west •D1 zone=CBD Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning DOWNTOWN PLAN: 5 KEY MOVES Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning DOWNTOWN PLAN Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning DOWNTOWN PLAN “The desired result is a 24-hour downtown fueled by significant numbers of new employees, residents and visitors, both day trip and overnight guests. In partnership with the arena and adjacent stakeholders, city hall should develop strategies to support this growth.” Downtown Plan, page 88 Different name in 2016 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SALT PALACE DISTRICT VISION “Active street fronts” “artistic entertainment opportunities” “well connected” “The Salt Palace does not turn its back to the streets” Downtown Plan, pg 100 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning HOUSING POLICIES Locate family housing in areas with good access to schools (West High is a 10-15 minute walk) Modify zoning regulations to encourage a variety of housing types Align city hall programs with other financing programs to implement affordable housing near transit. Downtown Plan, pg 40 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ALTERNATIVES: JAPANESE CHURCH OF CHRIST •Increase setbacks from the church •Limit height of buildings immediately adjacent to current height. •Maintain and expand existing garden around property Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ALTERNATIVES: SMITH ENTERTAINMENT GROUP •Design review above 400 feet •Off premise advertising allowed in sign overlay Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Recommendation: Not Adopt, but: •FUNDING RENOVATIONS OF ABRAVANEL HALL IN CURRENT LOCATION AND FORM; •BUFFER JAPANESE CHURCH OF CHRIST, ADJACENT GARDEN, AND BUDDHIST TEMPLE TO AVOID IMPACTS; •REQUIRE A COMMUNITY BENEFIT Staff Recommendation: Adopt as follows •INCREASE ALLOWED HEIGHT TO 600 FEET IN D4 ZONE •Maintain design review above 75 feet •STADIUMS AND COMMERCIAL PARKING BE A PERMITTED USE •Heliports to remain a conditional use •EXTEND THE ARENA SIGN OVERLAY TO THE SALT PALACE BLOCKS •No off-premise advertising at this time 1 ______________ ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL jill love 06/18/2024 jill love (Jun 18, 2024 17:01 MDT)Date Received: Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 06/18/2024 TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 06/18/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods _ SUBJECT:PLNPCM2024-00441 Sports, Entertainment, Cultural, and Convention District Text Amendments STAFF CONTACT: Nick Norris, Planning Director, nick.norris@slcgov.com 801-535-6173 DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the recommendation from the Planning Commission and the Planning Division and consider adopting an ordinance that supports the zoning changes to implement the Downtown Plan. The Planning Commission recommended not adopting the proposal or a modified proposal, while the Planning Division is recommending adopting the proposal. BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal was initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall in response to SB 272 Capitol City Revitalization Act which was adopted by the Utah Legislature earlier this year. SB 272 established a process for creating a “project area” to support the development of an entertainment district around a stadium that is home to a professional sports franchise. One of the requirements of the act is that the zoning to support the project area be in place by September 1, 2024. The proposed zoning changes are intended to satisfy the deadline in State Code and expand the development potential within the D4 Secondary Central Business Zoning District. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 2 D-4 PROPOSED CHANGES The proposed text amendments include the following general changes to the D4 Secondary Central Business District: •Modify the maximum height allowed through design review from 125 feet to 600 feet. •Modifying the required front and corner yard setback requirements are changing to clarify that buildings with plazas and other similar public spaces are allowed to exceed the maximum setback. •Change the table of allowed uses for the D4 zoning district would change as follows: o Stadiums change from a conditional use to a permitted use. o Commercial parking would be changed from a conditional use to a permitted use. (A current requirement prohibiting the demolition of a building for principal use parking on the property would remain.) •Expand the existing sign overlay that applies to the Delta Center to extended to the blocks that contain the Salt Palace. This allows more flexibility for signs related to the entertainment venues within the overlay and allows modifications to signs through the design review process for buildings that are subject to design review. o The Planning Commission recently reviewed a proposed sign overlay for the Salt Palace (PLNPCM2023-00154). That proposal is like the existing arena sign overlay and would allow additional sign types and larger signs. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of that proposal with modifications that included removing the land where the Utah Museum of Contemporary Art and Abravanel Hall from the sign overlay and recommending limitations on illuminated signs. The council has not yet discussed the Salt Palace sign overlay. The proposal associated with the Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention District would extend the sign overlay that applies to the arena to the Salt Palace blocks, resulting in one overlay instead of two. The council may want to consider both of those proposals at the same time or extend the sign overlay to only one block directly east of the Delta Center. o The D1 and D4 zones currently have the same base sign regulations. The arena overlay mostly increases the size of the allowed signs. Digital signs are already allowed within the overlay and within the base sign regulations. The details of the proposed text changes can be found in the attached ordinance. THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Division recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed amendments. The staff report presented to the commission identified several options that the commission may consider for amending the proposal. The Planning Commission, however, recommended that the council not adopt the proposal. The Commission did not offer modifications to the proposal for consideration, but did recommend that the City Council consider: •Maintaining Abravanel Hall in its current location and current form and allocating funds for its renovation. •A buffer be applied to the Japanese Church of Christ and adjacent garden and the Buddhist Temple to avoid impacting historic buildings. •That the City Council require a community benefit. 3 The motion passed unanimously. The reasons cited include the proposal not complying with the Downtown Plan or the purpose statement of the D4 zoning district and that the process was moving too quickly. PUBLIC PROCESS: This proposal included an online open house, an in-person open house, and a public hearing with the Planning Commission. A mailed notice was sent to all property owners and known occupants of each building and dwelling unit within the D4 zoning district, to all owners and occupants within 300 feet of the boundary of the D4 zoning district, and the Planning Division email list. The public hearing was also posted on the Utah Public Notice website and the Planning Commission website. In addition, notice was also sent to the Downtown and Capitol Hill Community Councils. Due to the September 1, 2024 deadline, the city utilized City Zoning Code section 21A.10.015.B.4 which allows for an exemption from the 45-day public input period under certain circumstances. This proposal utilized exemption a.(1) of 21A.10.015.B.4 which authorizes code amendments that are subject to an adoption deadline or action date set forth in legislation adopted by the Utah Legislature. The exemption utilized allowed the commission to make a recommendation within the required 45-day notification period. The notification period started on April 29th when all required notice of the 45-day notice period was mailed. The 45- day period ended on June 14, 2024. The Planning Commission made a recommendation on June 11, 2024. A summary of the public engagement, along with all written public comment received through noon on June 11, 2024 can be found in the Planning Commission staff report. Two email comments were received after noon on June 11, 2024. Those comments were read into the record of the Planning Commission. Planning Commission (PC) Records Due to the deadline in Utah Code, this transmittal provides a link to where the planning commission records will be placed. The minutes of the meeting will not be posted until they are approved by the Planning Commission, which is likely to happen after the transmittal is forwarded to the City Council. a)PC Agenda of June 12, 2024 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of June 12, 2024 (Click to Access, will not be posted until approved) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of June 12, 2024 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Hearing 4) Petition Initiation Request 5) Public Comment Received After PC Public Hearing 6) Mailing list 4 1. Ordinance 5 Project Title: Ente1tainment District Code Changes Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-00441 Version: I Date Prepared: June 18, 2024 Planning Commission Action: Not Recommended 6/12/2024 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summa1y purposes only): •Amends Section 21A.30.045 to clarify front yard setback requirements and modify building height within the D-4 zoning district subject to design review and other prov1s10ns. •Amends Section 21A.33.050 to allow "Parking, commercial", and '"Stadium" as permitted uses. •Amends Section 21A.46.110.A.3.b by expanding the location of the Arena Sign Overlay to include the Salt Palace blocks, provides a process to amend sign specific regulations within the overlay, and specifically prohibit off-premise adve1tising signs. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1 J. Amends Section 21A.30.045.D as follows: 2 D.Yard Requirements: 3 1. Front and Comer Side Yards: No minimum yards are required.:., ho1Ne>1er, a 4 ma:x:imll:Hl froat yanl seteaek of eight feet (8') is allov,•ed. If a front or comer side 5 yard is provided, the maximum setback shall be eight feet except for plazas and 6 other similar spaces. 7 a. If a yard is provided, The )'El:fft IBtiSt ee desigHed vrith the llSaeihty Effi a 8 soDBiaeratioa. De:r;elOf):EBeBt t;aat imf>lemeats the H:l-HEB. the yard is 9 required to have at least one of the following elements: 10 (1) Seating at a ratio of at least one bench for every five hundred (500) square 11 feet of yard space; 12 (2) Landscaping that includes an increase of at least twenty five percent 13 (25%) in the total number of trees required to be planted on the site; or 14 (3) Awning or a similar form of weather protection that covers at least five 15 feet (5') in width and length from all street-facing building entrances. VI Page 1 of 8 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney's Office Date: By: _----------------------------------------'I Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 6 16 b. Exceptions to this requirement may be authorized through the design review 17 process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title. . 18 c. The planning director, in consultation with the transportation director, may 19 modify this requirement to accommodate a wider sidewalk if the adjacent 20 public sidewalk is less than fifteen feet (15') wide and the resulting 21 modification to the setback results in a more efficient public sidewalk. The 22 planning director may waive this requirement for any addition, expansions, or 23 intensification, which increases the floor area or parking requirement by less 24 than fifty percent (50%) if the planning director finds the following: 25 (1) The architecture of the addition is compatible with the architecture of the 26 original structure or the surrounding architecture, or 27 (2) The addition reduces the extent of the noncompliance of the existing 28 building. 29 d. Regardless of the setback provided, doors shall be setback a minimum 30 distance to allow the door to operate without swinging into a right of way or 31 midblock walkway. 32 2. Interior Side Yards: No minimum side yard is required except a minimum of ten 33 feet (10') is required when the side yard is adjacent abutting to a zoning district 34 with a maximum permitted height of thirty five feet (35') or less. 35 3. Rear Yard: No minimum rear yard is required except a minimum of ten feet (10') 36 is required when the rear yard is abutting to a zoning district with a maximum 37 permitted height of thirty five feet (35') or less. 38 39 2. Amends Section 21A.30.045.E as follows: 40 41 E. Building Height: Buildings in the D-4 zoning district shall comply with the 42 following provisions: The permitted building height shall not exceed seventy five feet (75') 600 feet. Buildings taller than seventy-five feet (75') and up to one hundred twenty feet (120') may and up to 600 feet shall only be authorized through the design review process, subject to the requirements of Chapter 21A.59 of this title and the following regulations. a. Additional Height: Additional height may be authorized up to one hundred twenty feet (120') if the street facing facades contain ground floor commercial uses other than parking for at least seventy five percent (75%) of the street facing facades according to Chapter 21A.37 and subject to approval through the design review process in Chapter 21A.59. Page 2 of 8 43 1. 44 2. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 V1 VI Page 3 of 8 7 53 b..Additioeal PeHIHtted Height Loeatioe: 1-..dditioeal height greater thae oee 54 B-Mnarna tweet,' Feet (12Q') ettt est HlBt"e i½aH tB£ee B-Mnarea se1,eet,r H1,e Feet 55 (375') Hl: height is peHB:itted ffl the area 00Uflded by: 56 (1) The eenterhees of South Temple, West Temple, 200 South, flfl:d 200 ·west 57 Strnets; flfl:d 58 (2) BegHl::Elffig at the Soatheast Comer of Block a7, Plat 'A', Salt Lake City 59 gHP,'e;r, BH@ fl¼l½BH)g theeee a,l,seg the seath li.He of saia Bleek 07, 60 N89°54'02"Vl 283.86 feet; thence N00°04'50"E 38.59 feet; thence 61 Nl0°46'5l"Vl 238.70 feet; theeee N24°45'15"Vl 62.98 feet; theeee 62 sg9°54'02"E 355.45 feetto the east hee of said Block a7; theace a.loeg 63 said east hee S00°06'35"\V 330.14 feet to the poi.Ht ofbegiaemg. Cnetai.Hs 64 102,339 sqttat"e Feet, or 2.3 49 a.eres, Htore or less. 65 66 3. BailB:Hlgs Hl e (eess of oee hmulred tv,,enty feet (120') llfl to thrne hllfld:J.ed sev,eHty 67 fi¥e feet (375') Hltlry" be authorized subject to the fullowHl:g ptw.;iuions: 68 a. Af)prn>tal is sttbjeet to Chapter 2L<\.59 Design Re>ti:ew; 69 &.-a.Shall include a minimum stepback of five feet (51) or other architectural 70 feature that can deflect snow and ice from falling directly onto a sidewalk, V1 Page 4 of 8 8 71 midblock walkway, or other public space. The stepback may be located above 72 the height of the first floor and below one hundred twenty feet (120') in height 73 above the sidewalk or public space. Buildings that are clad in glass that totals 74 less than fifty percent (50%) of the total wall surface area are exempt from 75 this requirement; Buildings with less than fifty percent (50%) of the total 76 façade surface cladded in glass are exempt from this requirement; and 77 c. The additional height is supported by the applicable master plan; and 78 db. The building includes at least one of the following five options: 79 (1) Midblock walkway is provided on the property and the. The midblock 80 walkway connects to an existing or planned street, midblock walkway, or 81 publicly accessible public space and exceeds all the required dimensions 82 of Section 21A.30.010.G by at least five feet;. This option allows for 83 additional height in return for exceeding the midblock walkway 84 requirements; 85 (2) The building is utilizing affordable housing incentives identified 86 in chapter 21A.52 of this title.; 87 (3) The property where the building is located exceeds the minimum 88 requirement for ground floor uses identified in Chapter 21A.37 (Design 89 Standards) of this title, specifically: 90 (A) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1 (Design Standards Defined, 91 Ground Floor Use Only), the requirement must be increased to one hundred 92 percent (100%). This option requires that the entire ground floor use of a 93 building consists of retail good establishments, retail service establishments or 94 restaurants, public service portions of businesses, department stores, art 95 galleries, motion picture theaters, performing art facilities or similar uses that 96 encourages walk-in traffic through an active use. Vehicle entry and exit ways, 97 necessary for access to parking and loading and unloading areas required by 98 this title are exempt from this requirement provided these areas do not exceed 99 20% of the length of a building façade that faces a public street or public 100 space; or 101 (B) For Subsection 21A.37.050.A.2 (Design Standards Defined, Ground Floor 102 Use and Visual Interest), the ground floor use requirement must be increased 103 to seventy five percent (75%) and the visual interest requirement must be 104 increased to twenty five percent (25%). This option requires for an increased 105 percentage of ground floor space to be used for an active use, and an increased 106 percentage of the building to provide visual interest; 107 (4) The applicant provides a restrictive covenant on a historic building, a 108 building that is fifty (50) years or older, or a building that is a nationally 109 recognized property, located outside of the H Historic Preservation V1 Page 5 of 8 9 110 Overlay District for the purpose of preserving the structure for a minimum 111 of fifty (50) years.; or 112 (5) The proposal includes a privately owned, publicly accessible open space 113 on the property or on another property within the geographic boundaries 114 of the Downtown Plan. To qualify for this provision, a restrictive covenant 115 in the favor of the city shall be recorded against the open space portion of 116 the property. The space shall be a minimum of five hundred (500) square 117 feet and include enough trees to provide a shade canopy that covers at 118 least sixty percent (60%) of the open space area. This option allows for 119 additional height in return for the designation of open public open space. 120 ec. Exception: The first fifty feet (50') of height shall not be set back from the 121 street front more than five feet except that setbacks greater than five feet (5') 122 may be from the front property line, unless approved through the design 123 review process or, has when otherwise allowed by this code. 124 3. Amends the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts in Section 125 21A.33.050 only as to the “Parking, Commercial” and “Stadium” uses, with no other 126 changes to the table, as follows: 127 Permitted and Condition Uses By DistrictUse D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Parking, commercial C19 P19 C19 PC19 Stadium C C PC 128 129 130 4. Amends Section 21A.46.110.A.3.b as follows: 131 132 b. Sports Arena and Convention Center Sign Regulations. Located on the Block 133 Between South Temple and 100 South Between 300 and 400 West Streets. The following 134 signs shall be permitted on the blocks that contain the sports arena and convention center, 135 described as follows: beginning at the southwest corner of the intersection of South 136 Temple and West Temple Streets, heading south to the intersection of 200 South and 137 West Temple Streets, thence west to the intersection of 200 South and 200 West Streets, 138 thence north to the intersection of 100 South and 200 West, thence west to the 139 intersection of 100 South and 400 West Streets, thence north to the intersection of South 140 Temple and 400 West, thence east to the point of beginning. Modifications to sign 141 regulations within this overlay may be approved as part of the design review process for 142 any building that is subject to 21A.59. Signs shall not include off-premise advertising. 143 STANDARDS FOR THE SPORTS ARENA AND CONVENTION CENTER. LOCATED ON 144 THE BLOCK BETWEEN SOUTH TEMPLE AND 100 SOUTH BETWEEN 300 AND 400 145 WEST STREETS V1 Page 6 of 8 10 Types of Signs Permitted7 Maximum Area per Sign Face Maximum Height of Freestanding Signs1 Minimum Setback2 Number of Signs Permitted per Sign Type Awning/canopy signs 5 square feet per linear foot of canopy length (sign area only) Shall not be located above the second floor level of the building for both awning and canopy signs May extend 6 feet from face of building but not within 2 feet from back of curb 1 per first floor window/door, may be combined with adjacent doors/ windows Flat sign (general building orientation) 5 square feet per linear foot of building face See note 1 n/a 1 per building face Flat sign (storefront orientation) Flat sign (storefront orientation) See note 1 n/a 3 per business storefront Flat sign display, electronic changeable copy3 No larger than 1,400 square feet per sign See note 1 n/a 5 per city block Freestanding sign, electronic changeable copy4 Not more than 1,600 square feet per sign, which may be located in a continuous round display 45 feet n/a 2 per city block Monument sign 3 square feet per linear foot of street frontage 20 feet None 5 per street frontage Private directional sign5 100 square feet 20 feet No setback No limit Roof sign 5 square feet per linear foot of 20 feet above the roof line or parapet wall n/a 1 per building V1 Page 7 of 8 11 building frontage Roof surface sign 30,000 square feet6 n/a n/a 1 per roof surface Special event light pole sign 10 square feet 20 feet n/a 2 per light pole Special event sign Sign may cover up to 60% of total building face7 May not exceed the height of building n/a 1 per street frontage Window sign 90% of total frontage window area (interior or exterior) for sports arena events, not to exceed 6 months in duration for each calendar year unless otherwise allowed by the zoning administrator. No Limit n/a No Limit 146 Notes: 147 1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.J of this chapter.Reserved 148 2. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. 149 3. Flat sign, electronic changeable copy may display static or rotating messages or operate 150 as outdoor television monitors. 151 4. An advertising face on a freestanding sign with electronic changeable copy that is not 152 oriented to a public street may be operated to allow full motion video display. Displays 153 oriented to a public street must not allow animation, may change no more frequently than 154 every 8 seconds and must complete each transition within 1 second. 155 5. Private directional sign may include electronic changeable copy within the sign area. 156 6. To be located on the horizontal plane of a roof surface, primarily viewable from planes 157 and surrounding buildings located above the arena. V1 Page 8 of 8 12 158 7. Advertising or corporate logos are limited to on premises advertising of sports arena 159 events and sponsors only. 160 13 2. Project Chronology 14 Chronology April 18, 2024 Petition Initiated. April 25, 2024 Notice sent via email to Downtown and Capitol Hill Community Councils April 29, 2024 Notices of public input period, May 9, 2024 open house, and May 22, 2024 Planning Commission public hearing mailed. May 9, 2024 In person open house held outside of the Delta Center. May 13, 2024 May 22nd Planning Commission Public Hearing postponed until June 12, 2024. Updated notice of new date of public hearing mailed. June 12, 2024 Planning Commission Public Hearing held. 15 3. Notice of City Council Hearing 16 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-00441 Zoning Text Amendment to the D4 zoning district to support the creation of a Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention District around the Delta Center and Salt Palace Convention Center. The proposed text amendments increase the allowed building height in the D4 zone, change stadiums and commercial parking uses from conditional to permitted uses, expand the Arena Sign Overlay to the Salt Palace blocks, and makes other minor changes to the D4 zoning district. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: , at 7:00 PM PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Nick Norris at 801-535-6173 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e- mail at nick.norris@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2024-00441. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 17 4. Petition Initiation Request 18 19 5. Public Comment Received After PC Public Hearing 20 Norris, Nick F1rom: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Stephen Erickson Wednesday, June 12, 2024 1:25 PM Norris, Nick; Planninq Public Comments (EXTERNAL) Comments for Planning Commission re: rezone for downtown (SEG) Comments to Sl..:Cre Sports Entertainment Zone.docx I Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Dear Mr. Norris and Planning Commissioners, As a volunteer for Crossroads Urban Center, I am writing to support comments Crossroads submitted for you meeting tonight, and to add a couple of my own. I have also attached for your information a letter I submitted to the City Council for their meeting on May 21. I think it wise for the Commission to postpone any action on the proposed rezone downtown until the decisions are made whether or not to create a Community Reinvestment Area or a Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone for downtown redevelopment, as well as to await more information about the projects envisioned and the Community Benefits Agreements sought. There is enough time under SB 272 to allow for a more informed and robust public review process, and these decisions could have a significant influence upon the direction and financing options for any redevelopment. I also wish to state my personal objection to the proposed heliport, which I think is unnecessary and would add too much noise pollution downtown. Additionally, II would caution against a too-liberal allowance of light- polluting and obnoxious, invasive electric signage. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Respectfully, Steve Erickson Salt Lake City, UT 84103 21 Norris, Nick From:Bill Tibbitts Sent:Tuesday, June 11, 2024 2:37 PM To:Mendenhall, Erin Cc:Glenn Bailey; Petro, Victoria; Puy, Alejandro; Wharton, Chris; Lopez Chavez, Eva; Mano, Darin; Dugan, Dan; Young, Sarah; Otto, Rachel; City Council Liaisons; Council Comments; Mayor; Thomas, Blake; Norris, Nick; Clark, Aubrey; Planning Public Comments Subject:Re: (EXTERNAL) Letter about Delta Center rezone proposal (Letter attached this time) Dear Mayor Mendenhall, City Council Members, and Planning Commissioners: We have been pleased by recent media reports stating that Salt Lake City elected officials are negotiating with Smith Entertainment Group to obtain significant community benefits for all city residents in the proposed Delta Center tax and redevelopment plan. We are particularly pleased to read that there are negotiations underway to include affordable housing in this major development. Today we ask city leaders to postpone all votes on zoning changes or tax increases in support of the tax and redevelopment plan until the details about housing and other community benefits are finalized and made available to the public. A delay of days or weeks to finalize these kinds of details can only improve the final outcome. We also reiterate the position that we took on May 17, 2024, that ten percent of the units within the proposed redevelopment should be affordable to households earning less than $30,000 per year and that an additional ten percent be affordable to households earning less than $60,000 per year. Bill Tibbitts (He/Him/His) Deputy Executive Director Crossroads Urban Center 347 South 400 East Salt Lake City, UT 84111 www.crossroadsurbancenter.org 22 Norris, Nick From:CM Crompton Sent:Tuesday, June 11, 2024 4:55 PM To:Norris, Nick Subject:(EXTERNAL) Smith SPORTS/CONVENTION/ENTERTAINMENT/CULTURE. DIST. Proposal Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Please consider the “livability” of mostly high-end housing encroached on by height (expanded restrictions) Jumbotron (bright lights and noise) Heliport (extreme noise and intrusive disruption at random hours. Not to mention crowd, traffic/parking complications. Maybe too much indulgence for a livable and vibrant downtown? Would backers want to tolerate these intrusions where they live? Please convey these concerns since the meeting announced for tonight will not include a discussion of this proposed plan. I called several entities to confirm this. Regards, C. Crompton SLC. 23 6. Mailing list 24 PO BOX 1374 SALT LAKE UT 84110 1400 WEST ASSOCIATES, LLC 573 W STATE ST PLEASANT UT 84062 172 WEST 300 SOUTH, LLC PO BOX 2406 SALT LAKE UT 84110 214 NORTH TEMPLE CONDOMINIUMS AMD COMMON AREA MASTER CARD 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 218 BROADWAY, LLC 150 S STATE ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 309 WEST LC 375 W 200 S # 100 SALT LAKE UT 84101 39/42 LLC 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE UT 84111 401K HOME MOSTLY INC.1474 BLACK STONE AVENUE SAN JOSE CA 95118 99 WEST CONDOMINIUMS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE UT 84151 99VESTRY, LLC PO BOX 71670 PHOENIX AZ 85050 A E G FAM TRUST 4368 S ADONIS DR MILLCREEK UT 84124 A FAM TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 401 SALT LAKE UT 84101 A J & M CO LLC 7875 S 965 E SANDY UT 84094 AARON A ROYCE; BRIAN L HUTCHINSON (JT)346 W PIERPONT AVE #W115 SALT LAKE UT 84101 AARON HSU 360 W 300 S #229 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ABHINEET SABHARWAL 360 W 300 S #218 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ADAM DELEEUW; SHARON K DELEEUW (JT)342 W 200 S # 110 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ADRIAN LAZO 1539 S 1000 E SALT LAKE UT 84105 ADRIAN STALDER; SHOUWEN XU (JT)1781 PARK BLVD PALO ALTO CA 94306 ADRIENNE JARRETT 342 E EDITH AVE SALT LAKE UT 84111 AHMET B ALTINAY 328 W 200 S # 603 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALAMO CREEK 607 LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALASTAIR STEWARD 336 W 300 S #407 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALEXI RAE HATCH 163 W 200 S #405 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALIA MASSOUH 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W105 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALINA WHITE 328 W 200 S #408 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALISE ANN KING; KELLY KING; SYDNEY HATCH KING (JT)328 W 200 S #210 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ALLAN D ANDERSON; ALLAN J ANDERSON (JT)360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 AMBER GONDA; ROBERT GONDA 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 AMIR KASHANI 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 AMRA PASIC 336 W 300 S # 211 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ANDRA L LALLI REVOCABLE TRUST 09/05/2006 3070 S 950 E BOUNTIFU UT 84010 ANDREW LANE 328 W 200 S # 205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ANDREW VANDONGEN 327 W 200 S #303 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ANGELIA BUSH 342 W 200 S #106 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ANTHONY Y STRIKE TRUST 10/29/2022 9904 HUNTERS RUN LN CINCINNATOH 45242 AP FORD BUILDING, LLC 1616 CAMDEN RD CHARLOTT NC 28203 API QOZB, LLC 1074 E MUTTON HOLLOW RD KAYSVILLE UT 84037 APPLE HOSPITALITY SLCC 7140, LLC APPLE HOSPITALITY COMPANI RICHMON VA 23219 APPLE HOSPITALITY SLCH 7141 LLC 814 E MAIN ST RICHMON VA 23219 ARENA 327 LLC 327 W 200 S #001 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ARENA 327 LLC 327 W 200 S #103 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ARENA 327 LLC 327 W 200 S #104 SALT LAKE UT 84101 AREVKAP, LLC 1906 E JEREMY DR MURRAY UT 84121 ARNOLD L SWINDLEHURST; KAREN A SWINDLEHURST (JT)17 WHITMAN CT IRVINE CA 92617 ARTSPACE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, LLC 230 S 500 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 ASHLEY DAWN WASDEN 360 W 300 S #403 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ATCAT IRREVOCABLE TRUST 09/27/2023 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 AUGUST ALLEN 2790 E JUNIPER WY HOLLADAY UT 84117 AUSTIN MARK LONG; LELA RAE LONG (JT)360 W 300 S #203 SALT LAKE UT 84101 AXIS BUILDING ASSOCIATES, LLC 175 S MAIN ST # 610 SALT LAKE UT 84111 B REVOC TRUST 3579 KENZIES WAY N SANTA CLA UT 84765 BANDALOOPS, LLC 51 E 400 S # 210 SALT LAKE UT 84111 BANDED PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 743 CLEARFIEL UT 84089 BARBARA E YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST 04/14/2020 1545 S 1400 E SALT LAKE UT 84105 BARBARA ZIEGLER 336 W 300 S #202 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BARBU GOCIMAN 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1804 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BARBU GOCIMAN 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 BAY PACIFIC AMERICAN PLAZA II LLC 2001 UNION ST STE 300 SAN FRANCCA 94127 BCAL GATEWAY PROPERTY LLC 90 S 400 W # 570 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BENJAMIN THOMAS HATCH 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 BENSON, JOHN; BENSON, NANCY (JT)901 CHAHOTKIN DR ALEXANDR VA 22308 BENSON, JOHN; BENSON, NANCY (JT)901 CHAHOTKIN DR ALEXANDR VA 22308 BERGESON FEBRUARY 5,2014 FAMILY TRUST 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 BIGGER D INVESTMENTS L.L.C.320 W 200 S # FL-3 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BILL & CAROL BENGTZEN LLC 3577 E 8620 S COTTONW UT 84121 BINGHAM BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP 1658 E 1700 S SALT LAKE UT 84105 BK HOTEL, LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE UT 84109 BLAKE BRADLEY PETERSON 380 W 200 S #409 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BLAKE KENNETH SARLO 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 BNOLLC 51 E 400 S # 210 SALT LAKE UT 84111 BOYER GATEWAY HOTEL LC 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE UT 84111 BRABO INVESTMENTS LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRACKENBURY VENTURES, LLC 1452 S YUMA ST SALT LAKE UT 84108 BRADEN STEN 9751 S SILICA DR WHITE CIT UT 84094 BRADLEY DOCKTER 380 W 200 S #205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRADY MCINTYRE 308 W 300 S #LL2 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRANDI PATRICE TILLMAN 360 W 300 S #233 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRANDON WORTH HARGETT REVOCABLE TRUST 02/17/2022 328 W 200 S #607 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRENDA WRIGHT TRUST 06/27/2019 1217 N 1390 W SAINT GEO UT 84770 25 BRENT M PALFREYMAN (SURV)9477 S 2555 W SOUTH JORUT 84095 BRETT ROSS 360 W BROADWAY ST # 617 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRIAN L DAVIS 11306 S BROWN SUMMIT CIR SOUTH JORUT 84095 BRIAN P ARTHUR 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E116 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRIGETA N BENSON REVOCABLE TRUST 08/24/2018 3589 N 825 E NORTH OG UT 84414 BRISTOW PROPERTIES, LLC 2402 S RURAL RD # 203 TEMPE AZ 85282 BROADWAY PARK LOFTS UNIT OWNER ASSOCIATION 1218 E 7800 S SANDY UT 84094 BRODY C LEVEN; BARRY M LEVEN; GLORIA R LEVEN (TC)366 W PIERPONT AVE # W201 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRUCE C KOELLIKER 4756 S HILLHOUSE CV # 102 MURRAY UT 84107 BRUCE R MCFADDEN 380 W 200 S # 408 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRUCE SESSIONS; CAROL SESSIONS (JT)380 W 200 S # 602 SALT LAKE UT 84101 BRYAN L WARD; KATHY M WARD (JT)PO BOX 658 OAKLEY UT 84055 BUILDING 107 LLC 7882 S DEERCREEK RD COTTONW UT 84121 BVREF 175, LLC 1144 S SILVERSTONE WAY MERIDIAN ID 83642 C FAM TRUST; NGC TRUST 155 CRESTRIDGE DR DANVILLE CA 94506 CAITLIN GRANDJEAN 327 W 200 S #205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CALEB E CRAIL; CASSIDY E CRAIL (JT)655 CHERRY CIRCLE LAKE OSW OR 97034 CAMPANIA HOLDINGS, LLC 725 E 200 S BOUNTIFU UT 84010 CARLA J HEWITSON 342 W 200 S #107 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CARLOS M MOLINA 360 W 300 S # 614 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CAROLYN RICH-DENSON TRUST 03/08/2016 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CARRESON PROPERTIES, LLC 30 E BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 CHARLES SCOTT CLAUSEN 336 W 300 S #201 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHARLOTTE SALEVURAKIS ASSET PROTECTION TRUST 05/31/2018 4098 S 1500 E MILLCREEK UT 84124 CHASE JOHNSON 360 W 300 S #227 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHECKETTS FAMILY TRUST 05/07/2008 163 W 200 S # 305 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRIS & HEDY EYRE 2006 FAMILY TRUST 08/30/2006 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRIS H WILSON 1367 CEDARWOOD LN LOGAN UT 84321 CHRISTENSEN FAMILY TRUST 12/21/2012 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 207 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRISTIAN TYLER WOLSEY TRUST 04/15/2020 360 W 300 S #212 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRISTINE CHI KHIET TRINH; VIVIAN KHIET TRINH (JT)116 VALLEY OAKS LOOP UNION CIT CA 94587 CHRISTOPHER GIAMBRI 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRISTOPHER J KIDD 342 W 200 S #101 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRISTOPHER PITZAK 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRISTOPHER SCHWARZ; SONYA SCHWARZ (JT)342 W 200 S # 102 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHRISTOPHER W GARRISON 2937 CHAMPA ST # A DENVER CO 80205 CHRISTOPHER WAYNE MYERS 163 W 200 S # 505 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84150 CIERA DELIN BELYEA 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W113 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CINDY RICKS; DAVID RICKS (JT)716 17TH ST BELLINGHAWA 98225 CITI PLACE, LLC PO BOX 540230 NORTH SA UT 84054 CITY CREEK ASSOCIATES, LLC 95 W 100 S #340 LOGAN UT 84321 CITY CREEK CENTER ASSOCIATES, LLC 200 E LONG LAKE RD #300 BLOOMFIE MI 48304 CITY CREEK INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 6618 SCOTTSDA AZ 85261 CITY CREEK RESERVE INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE UT 84151 CITY CREEK RESERVE INC 200 E LONG LAKE RD #300 BLOOMFIE MI 48304 CITY CREEK RESERVE INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE UT 84151 CITY CREEK RESERVE INC PO BOX 21045 SEATTLE WA 98101 CLYDE JUPITER FAMILY INTER VIVOS REVOCABLE TRUST 04/05/2023 430 W 400 N BOUNTIFU UT 84010 CLYDE JUPITER FAMILY TRUST 04/05/2023 430 W 400 N BOUNTIFU UT 84010 COATES FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 06/08/2021 328 W 200 S #604 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CONNIE BULLIS TRUST 05/07/2019 PO BOX 581282 SALT LAKE UT 84158 CONSTANCE A DALY REVOCABLE TRUST 10/30/2020 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CORNER 64, LLC 19 E 200 S SALT LAKE UT 84111 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE UT 84151 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE UT 84150 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE UT 84150 COURTLAND SCOTT SCHWERDT 328 W 200 S #502 SALT LAKE UT 84101 COWBOY UP ALPINE, LLC PO BOX 3809 ALPINE WY 83128 CRAIG C LABRUM; MICHELLE R LABRUM (JT)280 W 100 N STE A VERNAL UT 84079 CRAIG R NIELSEN; MARIE NIELSEN (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CRISTEN A MOORE 163 W 200 S #404 SALT LAKE UT 84101 CRYSTAL ARLENE NUNO; SIDONIO NUNO (JT)218 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 CURT LALLI 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 CW FRONT ROW, LLC 1222 W LEGACY CROSSING BL CENTERVIL UT 84014 D & V INVESTMENTS, LLC 4743 SUMMERWOOD DR BOUNTIFU UT 84010 D CHRISTIAN HARRISON 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAKOTA LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION PO BOX 171014 SALT LAKE UT 84117 DALE F OSTLER 7689 SITIO MANANA CARLSBAD CA 92009 DALLAS GRAHAM 336 W BROADWAY ST # 215 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DANE ADAM DEHART 917 E CARSON GARDEN LN MILLCREEK UT 84124 DANETTE FULLMER 214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 DANIEL BULLOCK 360 W 300 S #601 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DANIEL J ASH 69 W SYRACUSE RD VINEYARD UT 84059 DANIEL LOMBARDI; NICOLE SHERMAN (JT)328 W 200 S #202 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DANJUE SHANG PO BOX 992 PARK CITY UT 84060 DAVID BRIAN DOVE FAMILY TRUST 06/11/2020 360 W 300 S #219 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID DANIEL MIRAMONTES (JT)360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID E ORR 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E114 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID JAMES MICHELSON 5235 S GLENDON ST MURRAY UT 84123 26 DAVID L ARNSON; BOBBIE C ARNSON (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1203 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID L MOULTON; SUZANNE L MOULTON (JT)PO BOX 981120 PARK CITY UT 84098 DAVID L NORMAN 214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST # E2 SALT LAKE UT 84103 DAVID LOFGREEN 328 W 200 S #503 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID M NOWASKEY 328 W 200 S #409 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID RICKS; CINDY RICKS (JT)716 17TH ST BELLINGHAWA 98225 DAVID S CHRISTENSEN 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID SHEN; YOUSENG SHEN (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DAVID W BERNOLFO; GLORIA B ROTHWELL 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 DAVIDSON HEATH 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DDFAV, LLC 2833 PACES LOOKOUT LN SE ATLANTA GA 30339 DEHART INVESTMENTS, LLC 436 E 1200 S SALEM UT 84653 DEL R & DIANE D JONES TRUST 11/28/2018 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DERE FAMILY TRUST 04/20/2007 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 DEREK DAY; JAMIE STOKES (JT)835 E SPRING VIEW DR MILLCREEK UT 84106 DESERET TITLE HOLDING CORP PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE UT 84151 DHARMESH B AHIR 332 W PARK LN FARMINGT UT 84026 DIAMOND PARKING INC 605 FIRST AVE #600 SEATTLE WA 98104 DIANE T BARLOW 2949 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE UT 84108 DOMA TERRA HOLDINGS, LLC 9350 S 150 E SANDY UT 84070 DONALD J RIZZO; TERESA M RIZZO (JT)4230 ROUS ST SAN DIEGO CA 92122 DOUG STAKER 163 W 200 S #503 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DOUGLAS WAYNE II OWENS 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E110 SALT LAKE UT 84101 DUC VAN VU; THUVAN GULMAHONG (JT)17046 TESORO DR SAN DIEGO CA 92128 DUSTIN J FRANDSEN 1995 NAVAJO HEIGHTS MOAB UT 84532 DV-PARAGON LP 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 DW&PBL TR 1661 E 1220 N LOGAN UT 84341 ELIA TULE 216 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 ELIZABETH KAY GOREY 1847 S 2600 E SALT LAKE UT 84108 ELIZABETH R BEHRMANN; GARY BEHRMANN (JT)458 S 2150 W OREM UT 84055 ELK RIDGE MGMT-360 WEST BROADWAY 414 LLC 131 N 1200 E LINDON UT 84042 ELLEN M DONOVAN; VAUGH G PEDERSEN (JT)328 W 200 S #608 SALT LAKE UT 84101 EMILY & CRAIG STEWART TRUST 01/31/2019 2255 WALNUT BLVD WALNUT C CA 94597 ERIC COLTER CANNON 1920 E NUNLEY CIR HOLLADAY UT 84121 ERIC D FREY 360 W 300 S # 217 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ERIC D FREY 360 W 300 S #224 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ERIC R OLSEN 163 W 200 S # 202 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ERIC WEIKERT 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W207 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ERNIELITO D COSTELLO; LAURIE A COSTELLO (JT)911 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE UT 84103 ESTATE NOT IDENTIFIED 1405 N EASTHILLS DR BOUNTIFU UT 84010 EUGENE F SASSER 1765 PEACHTREE ST NE #B3 ATLANTA GA 30309 FAE HOLDINGS 483563R LLC; VMM LLC 51 E 400 S SALT LAKE UT 84111 FARR FAMILY TRUST 12/05/2000 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 FENG PING WU; SHU-NUAN LIANG (JT)5273 ELLICOTT CT CENTREVIL VA 20120 FIREFLY TRUST 03/20/2023 250 N RED CLIFFS DR ST GEORGE UT 84790 FORMAN FAMILY TRUST 09/30/1997 PO BOX 83001 JACKSON WY 83001 FRANCISCO CESAR PERUZZO; ROBERT GERALD OLSON (JT)328 W 200 S #305 SALT LAKE UT 84101 FRANCOIS LANCELOT GERDAY 360 W 300 S # 418 SALT LAKE UT 84101 FRANKLIN R & ANNA R ROLAPP FAMILY TRUST 01/30/1995 220 COLLINS AVE BALBOA IS CA 92662 FRED A DUNBAR; MICHELLE DUNBAR (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 FREDERIC V BULL 163 W 200 S #407 SALT LAKE UT 84101 G A ROPER INVESTMENTS, LLC 95 N MAIN FILLMORE UT 84631 G RYAN EADS 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 GAELLE BATOT; NICOLAS ZIEGLER (JT)360 W 300 S #615 SALT LAKE UT 84101 GARDINER PROPERTIES, LLC 1075 E 2100 S SALT LAKE UT 84106 GARRETT C ZUPAN 2131 SPRINGSTONE DR LELAND NC 28451 GARRETT LIVING TRUST 10/08/2019 5568 E PIONEER FORK RD EMIGRATN UT 84108 GARY C NIELSON 2444 E 70 S HEBER CITYUT 84032 GARY D DITTEMORE; RONALD D DITTEMORE (JT)5385 SHOSHONE CIR OGDEN UT 84403 GATEWAY BLOCK A CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION 101 S 200 E # 200 SALT LAKE UT 84111 GATEWAY HP, LLC 2425 E CAMELBACK RD PHOENIX AZ 85016 GATEWAY OFFICE 4 LC 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE UT 84111 GAYLE LEE FAIRBANKS 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 GERALD L JOHNSON; DIANE D JOHNSON (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 GERRIT W GONG; SUSAN L GONG (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1007 SALT LAKE UT 84101 GGI 380 WEST, LLC 380 W 200 S #302 SALT LAKE UT 84101 GH REV LIV TR 3000 S OCEAN BLVD #1402 BOCA RAT FL 33432 GMM LIV TR 1514 S PRESTON ST SALT LAKE UT 84108 GORDAN SAVIN; MIRNA NOVAK (JT)1051 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84102 GRANT COULSON; MICHAEL COULSON (JT)360 W 300 S #613 SALT LAKE UT 84101 GRAYR BLEYAN; CATHERINE TIANMIN YUN (JT)346 W PIERPONT AVE #E107 SALT LAKE UT 84101 GREEK ORTHODOX CH HOLY TRINITY OF SLC & GREEK COMM OF UTAH 279 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 GREGORY H NELSON LIVING TRUST 03/28/2000 AMD & RESTATED 09/15/202 508 W SAGUARO WY IRVINS UT 84731 GREGORY J DIRKS; SARAH J DIRKS (JT)2109 N CASCADE AVE COLORADOCO 80907 GREGORY NICHOLES CARLISLE REVOCABLE TRUST 06/23/1999 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 GRETA SOMMERFELD 163 W 200 S #310 SALT LAKE UT 84101 GRITS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC 8690 S ESCALADE CIR COTTONW UT 84121 GURR FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 09/18/1997 380 W 200 S # 603 SALT LAKE UT 84101 H TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #2007 SALT LAKE UT 84101 HAROLD CURTIS SIMONSEN 328 W 200 S #403 SALT LAKE UT 84101 27 HAYNES FAMILY, LLC 2810 E CRESTVIEW DR SALT LAKE UT 84108 HB3, LLC 1717 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE UT 84108 HEATHER CHOI 328 W 200 S #307 SALT LAKE UT 84101 HEATHER MARIE RICART; RAMON A RICART (JT)2949 W 12875 S RIVERTON UT 84065 HEIDI NESTEL; STEVE NESTEL 1380 CAPITOL ST OGDEN UT 84401 HELOU, LLC 3005 GILLIS FALLS RD MT AIRY MD 21771 HIGHWAY 40 DEVELOPMENT 6406 S KEEN CT SALT LAKE UT 84121 HILLTOP INVESTMENTS, LLC 32 W 200 S SALT LAKE UT 84101 HIRE INTEGRATED, LLC 163 W 200 S #303 SALT LAKE UT 84101 HNYBADGER PROPERTIES, LLC 720 N 450 W OREM UT 84057 HOLY TRINITY GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH 279 S 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 HOWARD MARTIN WINKLER; CATHERINE GEROWE WINKLER (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 HPTWN PROPERTIES TRUST 215 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 HS TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 806 SALT LAKE UT 84101 HUGH F CONNOR; A CLOTILDE HOUCHON (JT)346 W PIERPONT AVE # E122 SALT LAKE UT 84101 IGWLT 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1404 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ILYAS STARK; EVENINGSTAR STARK (JT)360 W 300 S #413 SALT LAKE UT 84101 INTERMOUNTAIN BUDDHIST CHURCH 211 W 100 S SALT LAKE UT 84101 ITF BROADWAY, LLC 1435 E ARLINGTON DR SALT LAKE UT 84103 J & M BOLLWINKEL LLC 145 W 200 S SALT LAKE UT 84101 J STEVEN HANSEN LIVING TRUST 11/19/2020 360 W 300 S # 225 SALT LAKE UT 84101 J. CHRISTOPHER LANSING 214 S WILTON RD RICHMON VA 23226 JAC TRUST 05/17/2022 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JACOB A CASE 380 W 200 S # 509 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JACOB ALLEN CASE 380 W 200 S #509 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JACOB SMITH WHITE; JONESSA WHITE (JT)580 S RIDGE LN ALPINE UT 84004 JACOB VAGO 336 W BROADWAY ST # 408 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JACOB VAGO 360 W 300 S # 204 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JADGEV RAJ & JASPREET KAUR LIVING TRUST 04/18/2018 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAEHO LEE; HYUNKYUNG BAE (JT)2249 E EVERGREEN AVE MILLCREEK UT 84109 JAIMIE COGSWELL 961 S LAKE ST SALT LAKE UT 84105 JAKE BOWERS 360 W 300 S #231 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAMES A PIPER 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAMES B & KRISTINE WHITESIDES FAMILY TRUST 06/01/2001 102 PANORAMA COTO DE C CA 92679 JAMES E JI 360 E 300 S # 214 SALT LAKE UT 84111 JAMES R & BOK DONG JEANIE BRADSHAW LIVING TRUST 12/19/2008 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAMES R GRIBIN; NANCY N YOUELL (JT)360 W 300 S # 409 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAMES REX 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W111 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAMES XU SHEN; LYNDA ZEBIN XU (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAMISON ROSS SPENCER; JENNIFER RUTH SPENCER (JT)327 W 200 S #301 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JAPANESE CHURCH OF CHRIST 268 W 100 S SALT LAKE UT 84101 JARED NEILSEN 536 N CENTER ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 JARED STEWART 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E124 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JASON & JAIRAN WARE FAMILY TRUST 02/05/2020 34 E COLUMBUS CT SALT LAKE UT 84103 JASON LEISER 328 W 200 S # 410 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JBJ & AMJ FAM TRUST 1117 COTTONWOOD CT CLEBURNE TX 76033 JEB TRST 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #2001 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JEFFRY JOHNSON 360 W 300 S # 202 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JENNIFER BROWN; AARON BROWN (JT)336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JENNIFER FREDSALL 2209 E 7495 S COTTONW UT 84121 JENNIFER MILLER 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JENS BACH NIELSEN 4295 N 2900 E PO BOX 87 LIBERTY UT 84010 JESSICA ANDERSON 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E108 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JILL B FUGAL REVOCABLE TRUST 09/17/2020 1216 N 600 W PLEASANT UT 84062 JKS 203, LLC 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JLARSEN GROUP HOLDINGS LLC 1265 E FORT UNION BLVD COTTONW UT 84047 JODIE JORGENSEN LIVING TRUST 05/23/2022; JOSHUA M SMITH LIVING TR 484 GREYSTONE DR FARMINGT UT 84025 JODY L CHIARAMONTE 404 ASPEN CT LA PLATA MD 20646 JOHN A SIVO; DENISE J TAYLOR (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOHN A VICKERS 328 W 200 S # 506 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOHN HAMILTON 360 W 300 S #422 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOHN J III MAZUROWSKI 328 W 200 S #204 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOHN M TEMPLE REVOCABLE TRUST 12/22/1998; SUSNA F TEMPLE REVOCABL 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOHN S ZIEGLER REVOCABLE TRUST 03/27/2019 3088 MEADOWS DR PARK CITY UT 84060 JONATHAN BRONSON 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JONATHAN W BLANCH 380 W 200 S # 601 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JONATHAN W BLANCH 380 W 200 S # 601 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JONATHON GRANT HAWK 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W213 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JORDAN HENDRICKSON 163 W 200 S #205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOSE G PACHECO-BRITO 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOSH BRANDT 839 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST #106 SALT LAKE UT 84102 JOSHUA C SPRINGER 327 W 200 S #406 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOSHUA CARLBERG 163 W 200 S #S5 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOSHUA CARLBERG 163 W 200 S #507 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JOSHUA LUND 1163 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE UT 84105 JR&HBSFL TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 906 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JR&HBSFL TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 906 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JSM 2020 TRUST 12/11/2020 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 JUAN GUTIERREZ; RINA DODSON (JT)380 W 200 S # 203 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JULIE ROBIN MCKEE 163 W 200 S #401 SALT LAKE UT 84101 28 JUSTIN BINGHAM 251 ROSEBAY DR ENCINITAS CA 92024 JUSTIN MAYHEW 165 W 600 N SALT LAKE UT 84103 JUSTIN P JOHNSON 336 W 300 S # 311 SALT LAKE UT 84101 JYLLANA BUCHER SWEET 378 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 K L ENTERPRISES, LLC 4833 N EDGEWOOD DR # 201 PROVO UT 84604 KADEN A ROARK 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 KAREN K KELLER; SCOTT C KELLER (JT)1738 STONE RIDGE CIR BOUNTIFU UT 84010 KAREN S BURNETT; RICHARD R JR SYME (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 KARL & BEVERLY SNOW FAMILY TRUST 06/01/2020; PATRICIA B RUST 640 S APPENZELL LN MIDWAY UT 84049 KATSANEVAS ENTERPRISES INC 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84103 KATSANEVAS ENTERPRISES INC 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84103 KAYLA NIELSON 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W208 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KBSIII 155 NORTH 400 WEST, LLC PO BOX 28270 SANTA AN CA 92799 KEITH ASHTON; HEIDI ASHTON (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 KEITH KUSUDA 380 W 200 S # 503 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KELLY V MEJIA 655 CHERRY CR LAKE OSW OR 97034 KELLY W HUBBARD; NINA HUBBARD (JT)1613 QUAIL CANYON DR LOGAN UT 84321 KELVIN H MOSS; LESLIE J MOSS (JT)9970 HADLEIGH DR GRANITE B CA 95746 KEVIN BOYLE 7968 CEDER WAY PARK CITY UT 84098 KEVIN ELSBERRY 661 W DUNNING CT DRAPER UT 84020 KEVIN HOWE 88 BUSH ST UNIT 4115 SAN JOSE CA 95126 KIMBERLY THOMPSON 342 W 200 S #206 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KIN LAU 34 MONROE ST NEW YORK NY 10002 KNOCK OUT HOLDINGS, LLC 360 W 300 S #237 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KOOS KAMP TRUST 08/03/2021 PO BOX 440069 KOOSHARE UT 84744 KOREY DAVIS 328 W 200 S #406 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KRD TRST 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #3001 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KRISTEN DYCHES; KIRK DYCHES 342 W 200 S #203 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KRISTIN MELLUS 328 W 200 S # 206 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KWJ IV INVESTMENTS LLC 547 W 2600 S BOUNTIFU UT 84010 KYLE STEPHEN ALEXANDER 328 W 200 S #208 SALT LAKE UT 84101 KYLE W WESTON 327 W 200 S # 401 SALT LAKE UT 84101 L.L.C. AHC 3684 E KAIBAB CIR SALT LAKE UT 84109 L.L.C. WESTGATE DESIGN 1525 E WESTMORELAND DR SALT LAKE UT 84105 LAF RV TRST 801 SAGE BRUSH DR WORLAND WY 82401 LAKE EFFECT PROPERTY, LLC 3362 W 1820 S SALT LAKE UT 84104 LANCE SPENCER; ALISSA ANN JONES (JT)342 W 200 S # 108 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LARRY H MILLER ARENA CORP 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 LAURA WARDLE 351 W 800 N # 1 SALT LAKE UT 84103 LAUREN & CHERYL LOCEY REVOCABLE TRUST 11/01/2022 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 LC 200 WEST HOLDING 254 S 200 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 LC CRANE ASSOCIATES 307 W 200 S # 4001 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LC RED DESERT HOLDINGS 1125 N HOVI HILLS DR CEDAR CIT UT 84721 LE CHENG & KAI YANG FAMILY TRUST 5/9/2016 13001 LORETTA DR SANTA AN CA 92705 LINDA MAI PENDWARDEN; MICHAEL SCOTT PENWARDEN (JT)163 W 200 S #206 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LI-SU FAMILY TRUST 06/24/2019 1172 E 40 N OREM UT 84097 LOFT 403 LLC 1158 N MOUNTAIN RD KAYSVILLE UT 84037 LOGAN D GUNNELL; KENI SUE NELSON (JT)360 W 300 S #602 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LORIN A BROADBENT REVOCABLE TRUST 12/04/2014; LARAE T BROADBENT R 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 LOUIS & CYNTHIA MILLER LIVING TRUST 05/14/2019 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 LOVE PAD SLC, LLC 1340 N 7000 E HUNTSVILL UT 84317 LP HAMPSTEAD JACKSON PARTNERS 1032 15TH ST NW #370 WASHINGT DC 20005 LTD GATEWAY ASSOCIATES 101 S 200 E SALT LAKE UT 84111 LUCAS HORNS; LUCAS HORNS; JOSHUA P SHUTKIND 328 W 200 S #308 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LUIS R MACIAS 380 W 200 S #403 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LUKE SCHUNK 328 W 200 S #306 SALT LAKE UT 84101 LYLE LIVING TRUST 10/19/2018 1360 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE UT 84105 M FAM TR 1453 E ALTA CIR SALT LAKE UT 84103 M RES TRUST 9350 S 150 E # 1000 SANDY UT 84070 MADELINE COTTLE 336 W 300 S #207 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MADISON POTTER 360 W 300 S #421 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MAGGIE ELIZABETH OLSON; ANDREW WILLIAM TAMM (JT)360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MAITE ALONDRA CARRANZA MARTINEZ 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E119 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MAITE ALONDRA CARRANZA MARTINEZ 360 W 300 S #206 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MALLORY BLAIRE BROWN 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MANISH OBEROI; LOVINA OBEROI (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MARC KENNEDY PO BOX 802 DRAPER UT 84020 MARCIALA HERNANDEZ; MARIA LAM; ANTONIO DE JESUS HERNANDEZ (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MAREN SNOW; NATHAN SNOW (JT)218 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 MARGOT SAYER 7934 CORTE CARLSBAD CA 92009 MARIA LAM; MARCIALA GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MARIELA SUELDO; JEAN FRANCOIS P SAUZEAT 463 E LANA CT DRAPER UT 84020 MARILYN E BRANHAM REVOCABLE TRUST 11/30/2017 8203 WHETSTONE RD MOUNTAI MO 65711 MARK CANNON; DEBRA CANNON (JT)3980 E FOUBERT AVE MILLCREEK UT 84124 MARK EDLUND 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MARK ROGERS 328 W 200 S #509 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MARK TAYLOR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MARY HEERS; ARTHUR; ARTHUR HEERS (JT)PO BOX 208 MENDON UT 84325 MATTHEW DADAM; MELINA DADAM (JT)4293 S FORTUNA WY MILLCREEK UT 84124 MATTHEW RICHARD GALE; CLAUDIA SOTO SAAVEDRA (JT)327 W 200 S #403 SALT LAKE UT 84101 29 MATTHEW S TAYLOR 380 W 200 S # 504 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MAURINE YVONNE WAYMAN; KLOE LORRAINE HAMMON WAYMAN (JT)163 W 200 S #304 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MAVERIK COUNTRY STORES INC 185 S STATE ST # 800 SALT LAKE UT 84111 MAXWELL CHRISTEN 360 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MB 336 BROADWAY, LLC 3023 E JANKE FLATS LN SANDY UT 84092 MCCARLEY HOLDINGS, LLC PO BOX 1627 VERNAL UT 84078 MCE INVESTMENTS LLC 328 W 200 S # 100 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MCLOFTS LLC 7684 S KESWICK RD COTTONW UT 84093 MEC SALT LAKE CITY HOTEL OWNER, LLC 425 MARKET ST STE 1050 SAN FRANCCA 94105 MEGAN MARTIN 336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MEHRDAD SAMIE; AMY BETH LUKAS (JT)233 N EASTCAPITOL ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 MELANIE HUSCROFT 252 W WILTSHIRE LN SARATOGA UT 84045 MELISSA M HOLDEN 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1905 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MICHAEL & MARILYN WOOD FAMILY TRUST 04/01/2015 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MICHAEL C HATCH; BARTLEY FRASER (TC)360 W 300 S # 616 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MICHAEL JOSEPH HORD 328 W 200 S #402 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MICHAEL SAGE HARPER; SHANE F HUISH (JT)360 W 300 S #606 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MIKE & JOYCE MURRAY FAMILY TRUST 12/05/2014 PO BOX 70367 SEATTLE WA 98127 MIKE E MORAN 380 W 200 S #305 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MIKE LOSCALZO 163 W 200 S #309 SALT LAKE UT 84101 MIR M KHAN 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 MRK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE UT 84103 MULTI-ETHNIC SENIOR HOUSING LTD 223 W 700 S # C SALT LAKE UT 84101 MW TRUST 1743 E BEECHWOOD DR LAYTON UT 84040 NAIDA KLJAJIC; MAIDA KLJAJIC (JT)336 W BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 NAMICA LLC 1980 E OLYMPUS POINT DR HOLLADAY UT 84117 NAMRE 401K TRUST 04/08/2019 637 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE UT 84103 NATHAN C PERRY 6195 S RATON LN MURRAY UT 84123 NATHAN KENT MILLER 336 W 300 S #303 SALT LAKE UT 84101 NATHAN KULICK 493 18TH ST #2 BROOKLYN NY 11215 NATHAN SNOW; MAREN SNOW (JT)214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 NATHANIEL SNEDDON 327 W 200 S #404 SALT LAKE UT 84101 NCE HOMES, LLC 1149 DANIELS CANYON DR LAYTON UT 84040 NEUROSTREAM MEDIA LLC 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E106 SALT LAKE UT 84101 NIKOLAI H WEDEKIND 380 W 200 S #201 SALT LAKE UT 84101 NORTH TEMPLE ENTERPRISES, LLC 1153 S 3600 W SALT LAKE UT 84104 NURIA MERCED ALVAREZ PAGAN TRUST 06/18/2018 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #18TH SALT LAKE UT 84150 OB-OK, LLC 230 NORTH STREET DANVERS MA 01923 OLGA N KONONOVA; ANDREY KUTUZOV (JT)348 W PIERPONT AVE SALT LAKE UT 84101 ONE TRIBE TRUST 09/29/2015 252 E WILTSHIRE LN SARATOGA UT 84045 OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STA OWN_ZIP PAINLESS PARKING LLC 163 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 PALMER FAMILY TRUST 01/10/2013 5600 W LOVERS LN DALLAS TX 75209 PAMELA S JACOBSON; KEVIN L JACOBSON (JT)380 W 200 S #307 SALT LAKE UT 84101 PAPERBOX DEVELOPERS, LLC 180 N UNIVERSITY AVE #200 PROVO UT 84601 PARKER FIELDS RESIDUAL TRUST UNDER THE KATHERINE SMITH FIELDS TRU 682 VILLA ST MOUNTAI CA 94041 PARRISH PLACE VENTURES LLC 360 W 300 S #101 SALT LAKE UT 84101 PATRICK 402 PARTNERS, LLC 2087 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE UT 84109 PATRICK LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC 1390 E THORNTON AVE SALT LAKE UT 84105 PATRICK PARTNERS LLC 111 E SEGO LILY DR # 400 SANDY UT 84070 PATRICK PARTNERS, LLC 1092 E SOUTHUNION AVE MIDVALE UT 84047 PAUL BOND; WENDY BOND (JT)163 W 200 S #209 SALT LAKE UT 84101 PAUL T BERGERA FAMILY TRUST 04/02/2001 2666 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE UT 84106 PEERY REFI LLC 2381 ROSECRANS AVE EL SEGUND CA 90245 PHAYNARITH PANH 2735 E ROBIDOUX RD SANDY UT 84093 PHILIP ERICKSON 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 PHILLIP BRUCE HANSEN TRUST 11/17/2005 1682 N 6250 E EDEN UT 84310 PHILLIP J HUNT; KAREN L HUNT (JT)675 S GREEN VALLEY PKWY HENDERSO NV 89052 PIER 346, LLC 8029 S HUNTERS MEADOW CIR COTTONW UT 84093 PIERPONT HOLDINGS, LLC 151 W PIERPONT AVE SALT LAKE UT 84101 PIERPONT LOFTS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 2340 PARK CITY UT 84060 PIETRA PROPERTIES, LLC 273 N 1550 E LAYTON UT 84040 PILONEX, LLC PO BOX 655 SPRINGVIL UT 84663 PLANET SOFTWARE, LLC 342 W 200 S #201 SALT LAKE UT 84101 PLAYA VIDA TRUST 07/14/2022; PINNACLE TRUST 07/14/2022 380 W 200 S #604 SALT LAKE UT 84101 POPLAR STREET PUB, LLC 242 S 200 W SALT LAKE UT 84101 PRACHAR TRUST 04/06/2021 14908 LA CUMBRE DR PACIFIC PA CA 90272 PRAJIT RAVINDRAN 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 PROMONTORY PROPERTY, LLC 1210 WINTERGREEN CT ALPINE UT 84004 PROPERTY RESERVE INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE UT 84151 PROVIDENCE PROPERTIES, LLC 2891 W 1500 S VERNAL UT 84078 R & D FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC PO BOX 712020 SALT LAKE UT 84171 R & L EYRE TRUST 12/21/2020 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 R&G COUNTRY MANOR LLC 1154 WINTERGREEN CT ALPINE UT 84004 RACHEL DENSLEY 11945 S HIDDEN CANYON LN SANDY UT 84092 RACHEL PARKIN 10 FAXON AVE APT 808 QUNICY MA 02169 RANDON J GARDINER 163 W 200 S #S19 SALT LAKE UT 84101 RDD FM TRST 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 REALINE PROPERTIES LLC 30 E BROADWAY ST # 310 SALT LAKE UT 84111 REBECCA A SCHNEIDER; NOLAN A SCHNEIDER (JT)328 W 200 S #507 SALT LAKE UT 84101 30 REBECCA ANN BROWN; ROBERT PAUL BROWN (JT)328 W 200 S #107 SALT LAKE UT 84101 REBECCA H OSTHED TRUST 11/27/2023 436 E DAIRY LN DRAPER UT 84020 REBECCA LECHEMINANT 656 S 500 E SALT LAKE UT 84102 RED CLIFFS LLC 7224 DRY CREEK RD LONGMON CO 80503 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY PO BOX 145518 SALT LAKE UT 84114 RENSOR PROPERTIES, LLC 10047 S COPPER KING LN SOUTH JORUT 84095 REX FIORI; CARMEN FIORI (JT)380 W 200 S # 407 SALT LAKE UT 84101 REZA FAKHRIEH; DOWLING FAKRIEH, JOCELYN FAKHRIEH 564 W 700 S # 406 PLEASANT UT 84062 RHRE 30 CITY CREEK, LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 RIAN J WENDLING 154 VILLAGE GREEN AVE WOODSTO GA 30189 RICHARD & REBECCA HARSTON FAMILY TRUST 11/10/2008 10676 S WATERY WY SOUTH JORUT 84009 RICHARD C TORMAN; AMY L TORMAN (JT)1661 SOMERSET CT FARMINGT UT 84025 RICHARD FESSENDEN 360 W 300 S #619 SALT LAKE UT 84101 RICHARD S MORLEY 25 E CENTER ST NORTH SA UT 84054 RLH PARTNERSHIP II LP 1775 TYSONS BLVD 7TH FLR MCLEAN VA 22102 ROBERT D HARRIS; TERRI L HARRIS (JT)99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 ROCIO SOTO LIVING TRUST 12/04/2019 380 W 200 S #404 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ROLAND CHRISTENSEN 501 N 1400 W SALT LAKE UT 84116 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SALT LAKE 27 N 'C' ST SALT LAKE UT 84103 ROMNEY VENTURES LLC 2265 E MURRAY HOLLADAY RD HOLLADAY UT 84117 RON L SPERLE; JACQUELINE SNOW (JT)11307 S SILVER CHARM LN SANDY UT 84092 RONALD K JOHNSON LIVING TRUST 07/07/2021 380 W 200 S #402 SALT LAKE UT 84101 RONALD ZIPPRICH; LINDA ZIPPRICH (JT)328 W 200 S #501 SALT LAKE UT 84101 RYAN BURKE 327 W 200 S # 203 SALT LAKE UT 84101 RYAN L MITCHELL 360 W 300 S #612 SALT LAKE UT 84101 S FAM TR 1224 W BATEMAN POINT DR WEST JORDUT 84084 SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE 211 W 100 S SALT LAKE UT 84101 SALT LAKE CITY CH, LLC 303 PEACHTREE CENTER AVEN ATLANTA GA 30303 SALT LAKE CITY INVESTORS, LLC; TYRONE REVERSE, LLC 5150 OVERLAND AVE CULVER CI CA 90230 SALT LAKE CITY TRUST 12/16/2019 1196 W SOUTHJORDAN PKWY SOUTH JORUT 84095 SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE UT 84114 SALT LAKE TABERNACLE CORP 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE UT 84150 SAMUEL J BIGGS; SHEILA R BIGGS (JT)2455 E MALLORY ST MESA AZ 85213 SANDBOX CAPITAL, LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 SANDEEP TALWAR 328 W 200 S #606 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SANDRA A LEFLER 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1903 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SARA LUND 360 W BROADWAY ST # 242 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SARAH ALLEN 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E102 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SAW RV TRST; MSW RV TRST 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 SAYER FAMILY TRUST 02/15/2006 7934 CORTE DOMINGO CARLSBAD CA 92009 SBL 7 LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 SC89, LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #1004 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SCHMIEDER FAMILY TRUST 07/23/2014 424 PIAZZA LIDO NEWPORT CA 92663 SCOTT BASMADJIAN; PHILIP BASMADJIAN; BARBARA BASMADJIAN (JT)336 W 300 S #204 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SCOTT HUMPHREYS 5050 CALATRANA DR WOODLAN CA 91364 SCOTT PELICHOFF; LYNN PELICHOFF (JT)3578 S 1950 W WEST VALL UT 84119 SEAN L KELSTROM 336 W 300 S #309 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SEAN STRASBURG; HOLLIE STRASBURG (JT)308 W 300 S # 201 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SELJETAD DEVELOPMENT LLC 273 PARK VIEW CIR BOUNTIFU UT 84010 SERIES BROWN LION LLC 1287 W BLOOMINGTON DR SOU ST GEORGE UT 84790 SHANDRA KOEHLER; ELIZABETH A KOEHLER 380 W 200 S #506 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SHARD HOLDING LLC 30832 HUNT CLUB DR SAN JUAN CA 92675 SHAWN MCCRANEY & MARY MCCRANEY LIVING TRUST 02/20/2020 380 W 200 S #507 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SHERI J JENSEN INHERITANCE TRUST 08/30/2021 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 SHERRI M FINDLAY 360 W BROADWAY ST # 238 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SHIJIE WANG 336 W 300 S #205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SHYLO FARNSWORTH 4604 SW IDAHO DR PORTLAND OR 97221 SIDDHARTHA HERDEGEN 380 W 200 S #202 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SIVAPRASAD SUKAVANESHVAR; PRABHA SUNDARAM (JT)327 W 200 S # 101 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SKYFALL23, LLC 336 W 300 S # 402 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STANFORD & GLORIA CALL TRUST 06/15/2022 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 STATE BOARD OF REGENTS LOAN PURCHASE PROGRAM 60 S 400 W # FL-5 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF UTAH PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE UT 84114 STEPHEN GOUGH 380 W 200 S #308 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVE & LORI TUTTLE LIVING TRUST 08/25/2021 328 W 200 S #301 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN & JEANNE WHITING REVOCABLE TRUST 11/26/2019 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN BURGESS 380 W 200 S #306 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN FINAU; JOSHUA JONES (JT)328 W 200 S #201 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN H SIMPSON 346 W PIERPONT AVE # W206 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN M MAXWELL 328 W 200 S #102 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN M MAXWELL 328 W 200 S #609 SALT LAKE UT 84101 STEVEN NICHOLAS BURGESS 312 27TH AVE E #A SEATTLE WA 98124 STONE TRUST LLC 195 HANOVER ST HANOVER MA 02339 SUNNIE HONG GILES LIVING TRUST 03/30/2015 5189 N RIVER PARK WY PROVO UT 84604 SUSAN M PALMER 328 W 200 S # 304 SALT LAKE UT 84101 SWEET CANDY COMPANY 28128 PACIFIC COAST HWY MALIBU CA 90265 SYDNEY IZABELLA GONZALEZ; LEVI LINCHENKO (JT)163 W 200 S #408 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TAKASHI WADA; NAOMI WADA (JT)47 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84111 TARRAH SAMUEL 336 W 300 S #413 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TAYLOR BICKMORE 1566 E TIMONEY RD DRAPER UT 84020 31 TAYLOR MORGAN 360 W 300 S #618 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TCR LIV TRUST 7417 EVERWOOD ST. NE KEIZER OR 97303 THE ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH 155 S 300 W # 101 SALT LAKE UT 84101 THE OLIVE QOZB, LLC 1095 E 2100 S SALT LAKE UT 84106 THOMAS D AARON; MICHAEL D AARON (JT)600 WILLOW RD # 23 MENLO PA CA 94025 TIFFANY S WAKELING 163 W 200 S # 302 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TIMOTHY DAVIS 342 E EDITH AVE SALT LAKE UT 84111 TIMOTHY J DUFFY; KRISTIN B DUFFY (JT)163 W 200 S #506 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TIMOTHY KUNZ 163 W 200 S #207 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TIRE TOWN MIXED USE CONDO PH 1 COMMON AREA MASTER CARD 1145 S 800 E #110 OREM UT 84097 TMC TRUST 03/23/2023 PO BOX 1421 DRAPER UT 84020 TODD RENNER 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E111 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TODD THEOBALD 328 W 200 S #104 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TORIA J MAGLEBY FAMILY LIVING TRUST 03/11/2015 1175 E SECOND AVE SALT LAKE UT 84103 TRACE COCCIMIGLIO PO BOX 1484 SANDY UT 84091 TRAVIS & ALLISON JENSEN TRUST 11/10/2023 6296 PARK LN NORTH PARK CITY UT 84098 TRAVIS EDGAR FINSTAD TRUST 12/02/2019; MADALY LINDA FINSTAD TRUST 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 TRAVIS EDWARD DORSCH; BREANNA ERIN STUDENKA (JT)342 W 200 S #207 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TRAVIS R PETERSEN; DAVID G VAN OOSTENDORP (JT)14883 S VILLAGE CREST DR DRAPER UT 84020 TREVOR NEEDHAM 163 W 200 S #308 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TRIEU NGUYEN & SOPHAN KOY TRUST 09/21/2023 3911 S MARKET ST WEST VALL UT 84119 TROY D WILLIAMS 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E121 SALT LAKE UT 84101 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 14485 SHADOWLANE CT MORGAN CA 95037 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 14485 SHADOWLANE CT MORGAN CA 95037 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 2420 FARETTO LN RENO NV 89511 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 1173 E 200 N FRUIT HEIGUT 84037 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 713 ELM DR PETALUMA CA 94952 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED 367 ALPINE WAY STAR VALL WY 83127 TUCKER J SAMUELSEN 336 W 300 S # 306 SALT LAKE UT 84101 UC SALT LAKE, LLC 39 E EAGLE RIDGE DR NORTH SA UT 84054 UFFENS MARKETPLACE UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 1 LEHI UT 84043 UTAH DOORS, LLC SERIES TWO 4607 W DAYBREAK PKWY SOUTH JORUT 84009 UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST #1900 PORTLAND OR 97232 VALERIE F CALL 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 VALERIE L KITCHEN 328 W 200 S #508 SALT LAKE UT 84101 VENKATA R MUTYALA 8013 LOS SABALOS ST SAN DIEGO CA 92126 VESTAR GATEWAY, LLC 2425 E CAMELBACK RD PHOENIX AZ 85016 VICTOR-PHILIBERT COULON; KUAN LUO (JT)360 W 300 S #211 SALT LAKE UT 84101 VILLAGE 415, LLC 6000 S OAKHILL DR HOLLADAY UT 84121 VILLAGE 415/PIERPONT SPE, LLC 132 W PIERPONT AVE SALT LAKE UT 84101 VINCENT GAISFORD 163 W 200 S #306 SALT LAKE UT 84101 VINCENT MICHAEL MCGUIRE & JUDY ANN MCGUIRE LIVING TRUST 05/31/202 4916 S CENTER ST MURRAY UT 84107 VINCENT NGUYEN 163 W 200 S # T609 SALT LAKE UT 84101 VINCENT T NGUYEN 163 W 200 S # 510 SALT LAKE UT 84101 VINCENT T NGUYEN 163 W 200 S # 510 SALT LAKE UT 84101 VIVIAN KHIET TRINH 43219 PORTOFINO TER FREMONT CA 94539 VMM ARROW PRESS LLC 51 E 400 S # 210 SALT LAKE UT 84111 VRHR TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 804 SALT LAKE UT 84101 W FAM TR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 507 SALT LAKE UT 84101 W&HARRJRTR 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST # 506 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WAREHOUSE DISTRICT CONDO OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 571885 SALT LAKE UT 84157 WAYNE ASHTON LARSON TRUST 12/26/1991 2831 E WANDER CIR HOLLADAY UT 84117 WAYNE D GRAY 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 WEIKERT GEORGIA PROPERTIES LLC 3199 WYNN DR AVONDALE GA 30002 WEST BROADWAY INVESTORS, LLC 420 S ORANGE AVE STE 1200 ORLANDO FL 32801 WEST QUARTER LODGING I, LLC 1245 E BRICKYARD RD SALT LAKE UT 84106 WEST RIVER, LLC 187 N 100 E PRICE UT 84501 WESTERN ROCKY COMPANY 2001 UNION ST # 300 SAN FRANCCA 94123 WESTGATE LOFTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 WESTGATE SB HOLDINGS, LLC 1157 N BOYNTON RD KAYSVILLE UT 84037 WESTON KAY 342 W 200 S #205 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAM C VANWAGENEN 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E101 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAM E GOLDMAN 163 W 200 S # 410 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAM ELLIOT GOLDMAN 163 W 200 S # 410 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAM J SUTHERLAND 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST #2103 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAM L ARTHUR 163 W 200 S # 509 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAM L SWANK 299 S MAIN ST # 1300 SALT LAKE UT 84111 WILLIAM M MOORE REVOCABLE TRUST 08/16/2016; PATRICIA A MOORE REVO 5835 NW 26TH AVE CAMAS WA 98607 WILLIAM MEAD 380 W 200 S # 304 SALT LAKE UT 84101 WILLIAMS IRREVOCABLE TRUST 04/05/2016 3140 ORION DR MOAB UT 84532 WOLF CAPITAL, LLC 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 WW ZEPHYR OWNER VIII, LLC 2716 OCEAN PARK BLVD SANTA MO CA 90405 Y FAM TR 1193 ANGUS CT PARK CITY UT 84098 YEVGENY TUCHINSKY 99 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE UT 84101 YOUNG JIM LLC 1400 S FOOTHILL DR SALT LAKE UT 84108 ZACHARY HADDENHAM 1796 S 300 E SALT LAKE UT 84115 ZI LLANG 163 W 200 S #504 SALT LAKE UT 84101 ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK NA PO BOX 54288 LEXINGTO KY 40555 32 Occupant PARCEL_ADDR NEW_UNIT CITY ZIPCODE STATE Current Oc 344 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 110 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 39 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 49 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 2 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 101 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 55 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 99 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 95 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 455 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 421 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 430 W 50 N Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 155 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 28 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 48 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 60 N 400 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 395 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 308 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 116 N 300 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 112 N 300 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 102 N 300 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 274 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 264 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 250 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 248 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 242 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 230 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 107 N 200 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 206 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 125 N 200 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 133 N 200 W #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #C3 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #C4 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #C5 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #C6 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #C7 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #C8 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E-1 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E2 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E3 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E4 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E5 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E6 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #E-7 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W1 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W2 Salt Lake C 84103 UT 33 Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W3 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W4 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W5 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W6 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W7 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #W8 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 55 N 300 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 55 N 300 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 340 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 240 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 269 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 75 N 200 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 95 N 300 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 345 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 150 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 144 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 134 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 60 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 100 N WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 163 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 161 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 159 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 50 N 200 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 40 N 200 W Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 160 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 45 N WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 35 N WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 122 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 141 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 143 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 151 W NORTH TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 50 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84103 UT Current Oc 76 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 301 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 301 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 301 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 365 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 365 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 377 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 141 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 125 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 125 S 400 W #REAR Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 141 S 400 W #REAR Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 316 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 320 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT 34 Current Oc 140 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 144 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 345 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 160 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 424 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 444 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 90 S 400 W #2A Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 90 S 400 W #2B Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 90 S 400 W #2C Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 90 S 400 W #2D Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 90 S 400 W #2E Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 90 S 400 W #2F Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 424 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #100 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #106 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #205 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #207 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #209 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #303 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #309 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #310 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #404 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #407 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #410 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #506 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #510 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #601 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #602 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #603 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 328 W 200 S #605 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #108 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #109 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #110 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S #204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 342 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT 35 Current Oc 441 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 110 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 440 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 441 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 235 S RIO GRANDE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 268 S 400 W #NFF Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 224 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 234 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 244 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 280 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 229 S RIO GRANDE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 214 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 437 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 375 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 357 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 353 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 340 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 235 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 229 S 400 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 331 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 378 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #001 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #301 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #303 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #309 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #406 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #407 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #408 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #501 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #502 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #503 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #504 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #505 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #508 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #601 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #602 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S #603 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 380 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 36 Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W106 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W107 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W109 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W110 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W112 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W201 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W205 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W209 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W210 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W211 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W212 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #W214 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E109 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E112 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E113 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E117 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E118 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E120 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E122 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE #E123 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 350 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 346 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #106 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #107 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #108 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #109 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #110 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #208 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #209 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #210 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #211 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #212 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #213 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #214 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #215 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 37 Current Oc 336 W 300 S #301 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #302 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #305 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #306 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #307 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #308 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #310 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #311 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #312 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #313 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #314 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #315 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #402 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #403 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #404 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #406 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #408 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #409 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #410 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #411 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S #414 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 336 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #209 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #210 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #213 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #214 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #215 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #216 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #217 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #223 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #225 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #226 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #228 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #230 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #234 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #238 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #239 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #240 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #241 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #242 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #402 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #404 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 38 Current Oc 360 W 300 S #405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #408 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #409 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #410 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #411 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #412 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #414 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #415 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #416 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #417 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #418 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #423 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #603 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #604 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #605 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #611 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #614 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #616 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #617 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #620 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #621 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S #609 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 360 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 279 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 34 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 40 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 36 S 200 W #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 265 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 255 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 215 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 48 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 55 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 50 S 200 W #NFF Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 60 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 266 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 276 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 222 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 218 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 212 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 64 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 72 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 155 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 243 W 100 S #-REAR Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 247 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 215 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 126 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT 39 Current Oc 120 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 274 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 150 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 260 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 222 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 111 S 300 W #COM Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 111 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 131 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 111 S 300 W #P1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 111 S 300 W #P2 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 260 W QUARTER ROW Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 20 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 79 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 65 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 151 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 170 S WEST TEMPLE ST #84101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 75 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 50 S MAIN ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 50 S MAIN ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 50 S MAIN ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 30 S MAIN ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 55 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 55 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 45 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 44 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 44 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 50 S MAIN ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 79 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 67 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 37 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 115 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 119 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 123 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 37 W 100 S #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 155 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 55 W 100 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 127 S WEST TEMPLE ST #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 175 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 165 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 50 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 147 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #201 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #205 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 40 Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #207 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #301 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #302 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #303 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #305 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #306 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #307 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #402 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #403 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #404 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #501 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #502 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #503 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #504 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #505 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #506 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #507 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #603 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #604 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #605 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #606 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #607 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #703 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #704 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #705 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #706 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #707 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #801 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #802 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #803 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #804 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #805 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #806 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #807 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #901 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #902 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #903 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #904 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #905 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #906 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #907 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1003 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1004 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 41 Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1005 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1006 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1007 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1106 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1107 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1201 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1205 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1207 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1301 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1302 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1303 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1305 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1306 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1307 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1402 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1403 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1404 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1406 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1407 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1503 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1504 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1505 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1506 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1507 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1601 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1602 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1603 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1604 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1605 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1606 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1607 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1701 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1702 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1703 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1704 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 42 Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1705 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1706 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1707 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1801 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1802 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1803 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1804 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1805 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1806 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1807 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1901 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1902 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1903 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1904 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1905 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1906 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #1907 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2001 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2002 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2006 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2007 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2106 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2107 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2205 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2207 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2301 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2302 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2303 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2305 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2306 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2307 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2403 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2404 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2405 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2406 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2407 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2504 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2505 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 43 Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2506 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2507 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2703 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #3001 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2800 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2900 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #406 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #701 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2005 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2701 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2704 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 307 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 230 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 325 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 314 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 315 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 217 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 227 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 229 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 231 S 300 W #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 233 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 235 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 247 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 255 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 275 S 300 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 263 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 241 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 225 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 224 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 258 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 240 S POPLAR CT Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 234 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 257 S POPLAR CT Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 263 S POPLAR CT Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 218 W 300 S #NFF1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 222 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 210 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 202 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 260 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 307 W PIERPONT AVE #LL1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #103 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #104 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #105 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #106 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #107 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 44 Current Oc 308 W 300 S #108 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #109 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #201 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S #202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 308 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #102 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #201 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #206 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #207 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #208 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #304 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #305 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #306 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #307 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #308 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #401 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #402 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #407 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S #408 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 327 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 155 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 149 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 206 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 122 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 143 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 152 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 144 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 141 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 175 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 215 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 139 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 257 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 257 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 159 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 145 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 168 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 110 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 157 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 149 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 259 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 250 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 138 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT 45 Current Oc 128 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 275 S 200 W Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 259 S 200 W #NFF Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 164 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 143 W PIERPONT AVE Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 77 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 57 W 200 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 225 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 80 W 300 S Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S1 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S3 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S4 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S6 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S7 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S8 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S9 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S12 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S13 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S14 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S20 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S21 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #S22 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #101 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #201 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #202 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #203 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #204 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #210 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #301 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #302 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #305 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #402 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #403 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #406 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #409 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #410 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #501 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #502 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #505 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #508 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #509 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #510 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T601 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T602 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T603 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T604 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T605 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 46 Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T608 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T609 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 163 W 200 S #T610 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #2501 Salt Lake C 84101 UT Current Oc 99 W SOUTH TEMPLE ST #260 Salt Lake C 84101 UT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2024 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning districts: Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: CHAPTER 21A.25 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 21A.25.020: Reserved 21A.25.030: Reserved 21A.25.040: Reserved 21A.25.050: Reserved 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in or near the subdistrict. B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 1. Row House Building Form Standards: a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form Standards: (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: (i). 1300 South (ii). West Temple (iii). Main Street TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following standards: 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area requirement. 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ by 15’. 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover at least 50% of the open space area. 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space area; c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; and/or d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. TABLE 21A.25.060.D DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. TABLE 21A.25.060.E F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any specific building form regulation. G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in this subdistrict. 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 1. The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2. The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 8. 21A.46 Signs 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 Legend: C =Conditional P =Permitted Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Amphitheater formal P Amphitheater informal P Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Community recreation center P Crematorium P Daycare 12 center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity) P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Single-family attached P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Health and fitness facility P Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P 13 Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Plaza P Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P 14 Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium P Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) Qualifying provisions: 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol Related Establishments", of this title. 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality administrative rules. 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this title. 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. 15 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows. C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. TABLE 21A.36.020.C HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and 16 Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts Note: 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban Neighborhood), FB-MU11 (Form Based Mixed Use 11 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN-SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 17 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with X 18 Notes: 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to the building type being allowed in the zone. 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.25 through 21A.34 of this title: form based mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon approval by the zoning administrator through an administrative interpretation application. b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be constructed of or contain: (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or plywood. SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 20 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ 21 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: 22 A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 23 Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/lodge Meeting hall of membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 24 per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less sq. ft., whichever is less per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 25 Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 26 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market Grain elevator Pet cemetery No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum 27 Stable Stockyard Urban farm Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility Performing arts production facility Reception center 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 28 Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 29 Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department Fashion oriented development 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 30 Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 31 Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay 32 Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum 33 Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum 34 Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 35 Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum All Contexts: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 36 Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution No minimum No minimum No maximum 37 Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station No Minimum No Maximum 38 Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for the convenience of employees No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 39 General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) No Maximum TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. 40 B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 41 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 42 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 43 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 44 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. 45 I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. 46 FB-UN2, FB- MU11, FB- SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 47 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 48 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 49 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b. That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new subpart (2) “Form Based Mixed Use Districts” as shown below and renumber the existing subparts as follows with no changes to the associated tables: (2) Form Based Mixed Use Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 Two additional stories with administrative Design Review. (3) Commercial Districts [codifier: no change to the associated table] (4) Form-based districts: [codifier: no change to the associated table] (5) Downtown districts: [codifier: no change to the associated table] (6) Other districts: [codifier: no change to the associated table] SECTION 16. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON 50 ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2024. Published: ______________. Ordinance adopting MU8 (final)v6 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 1 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 2 No. _____ of 2024 3 4 (An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 5 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict) 6 7 An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 8 to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169 to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict. 9 WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 10 public hearing on October 25, 2023 to consider a petition submitted by Salt Lake City Mayor 11 Erin Mendenhall (Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00169) to amend various sections of Title 21A of 12 the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to create the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, to 13 establish regulations for that subdistrict, and to apply the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 14 Subdistrict to the properties within boundaries of the Ballpark Station Area pursuant to Petition 15 No. PLNPCM2023-00169; and 16 WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2023 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of 17 transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 18 petition; and 19 WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 20 adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 22 23 SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.22.010. That Section 24 21A.22.010 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Zoning Districts, Map and 25 Boundaries) shall be and hereby is amended to add a new chapter titled “21A.25 Form Based Mixed 2 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 26 Use Districts” and subsection “21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict” in the 27 zoning districts table, which Section Reference and District Name shall appear as follows: 28 21A.22.010 ZONING DISTRICTS: 29 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 30 districts: 3132 Section Reference District Name A.Residential Districts: 21A.24.020 FR-1/43,560 Foothills Estate Residential District 21A.24.030 FR-2/21,780 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.040 FR-3/12,000 Foothills Residential District 21A.24.050 R-1/12,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.060 R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.070 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District 21A.24.080 SR-1 and SR-1A Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.090 SR-2 (Reserved) 21A.24.100 SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential District 21A.24.110 R-2 Single- and Two-Family Residential District 21A.24.120 RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.130 RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.150 RMF-75 High Density Multi-Family Residential District 21A.24.160 RB Residential/Business District 21A.24.164 R-MU-35 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.168 R-MU-45 Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.170 R-MU Residential/Mixed Use District 21A.24.180 RO Residential/Office District B.Form Based Mixed Use Districts: 21A.25.060 MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict B. C.Commercial Districts: 21A.26.020 CN Neighborhood Commercial District 21A.26.025 SNB Small Neighborhood Business District 21A.26.030 CB Community Business District 21A.26.040 CS Community Shopping District 21A.26.050 CC Corridor Commercial District 3 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.26.060 CSHBD Sugar House Business District 21A.26.070 CG General Commercial District 21A.26.078 TSA Transit Station Area District B D.Form Based Districts: 21A.27.040 FB-SC and FB-SE Form Based Special Purpose Corridor District 21A.27.050 FB-UN1 and FB-UN2 Form Based Urban Neighborhood District 21A.27.060 FB-MU Form Based Mixed Use District D E. Manufacturing Districts: 21A.28.020 M-1 Light Manufacturing District 21A.28.030 M-2 Heavy Manufacturing District E F.Downtown Districts And Gateway Districts: Downtown Districts: 21A.30.020 D-1 Central Business District 21A.30.030 D-2 Downtown Support District 21A.30.040 D-3 Downtown Warehouse/Residential District 21A.30.045 D-4 Downtown Secondary Central Business District Gateway Districts: 21A.31.020 G-MU Gateway-Mixed Use District F G.Special Purpose Districts: 21A.32.020 RP Research Park District 21A.32.030 BP Business Park District 21A.32.040 FP Foothills Protection District 21A.32.050 AG Agricultural District 21A.32.052 AG-2 Agricultural District 21A.32.054 AG-5 Agricultural District 21A.32.056 AG-20 Agricultural District 21A.32.060 A Airport District 21A.32.070 PL Public Lands District 21A.32.075 PL-2 Public Lands District 21A.32.080 I Institutional District 21A.32.090 UI Urban Institutional District 21A.32.100 OS Open Space District 21A.32.105 NOS Natural Open Space District 21A.32.110 MH Mobile Home Park District 21A.32.120 EI Extractive Industries District 4 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 21A.32.130 MU Mixed Use District G H.Overlay Districts: 21A.34.020 H Historic Preservation Overlay District 21A.34.030 T Transitional Overlay District 21A.34.040 AFPP Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay District 21A.34.050 LC Lowland Conservancy Overlay District 21A.34.060 Groundwater Source Protection Overlay District 21A.34.070 LO Landfill Overlay District 21A.34.080 CHPA Capitol Hill Protective Area Overlay District 21A.34.090 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.100 M-1H Light Manufacturing Height Overlay District 21A.34.110 DMSC Downtown Main Street Core Overlay District 21A.34.120 YCI Yalecrest Compatible Infill Overlay District 21A.34.130 RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District 21A.34.140 Northwest Quadrant Overlay District 21A.34.150 IP Inland Port Overlay District H I.Character Conservation Districts: 21A.35.010 Purpose 33 34 SECTION 2. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.25. That Title 21A of 35 the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 36 new chapter, 21A.25 Form Based Mixed Use Districts as follows: 37 CHAPTER 21A.25 38 FORM BASED MIXED USE DISTRICT 39 40 21A.25.010: GENERAL PROVISIONS 41 42 A. Intent: The intent of this chapter is to create a scale of form based, mixed use 43 districts that can be used in different areas of the city based on the land use policies identified in 44 the general plan. The regulations are intended to provide places for small and large businesses, 45 increase the supply of a variety of housing types in the city, and promote the public health by 46 increasing the opportunity for people to access daily needs by walking or biking. The 47 regulations focus on the form of development, the manner in which buildings are oriented toward 48 public spaces, the scale of development, and the interaction of uses within the city. 49 50 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based 51 on the land use tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. 5 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 52 53 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed 54 subject to the requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and 55 any other provisions that specifically applies to accessory uses and structures that 56 may be found in this title. 57 58 2. Obnoxious or Offensive Uses: No use of land shall be permitted which creates a 59 nuisance by reason of odor, dust, smoke, vapors, noise, light, vibration or refuse 60 matter. Any nuisance shall be considered a violation of this title. 61 62 21A.25.020: Reserved 63 64 21A.25.030: Reserved 65 66 21A.25.040: Reserved 67 68 21A.25.050: Reserved 69 70 21A.25.060 MU-8 FORM BASED MIXED USE 8 SUBDISTRICT 71 72 A. Purpose: the purpose of the MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 zoning subdistrict is 73 to implement the city’s general plan in areas that identify mid rise buildings, generally eight 74 stories or less in height, that contain a mix of land uses that support people who choose to live in 75 or near the subdistrict. 76 77 B. Building form standards for each allowed building form and other associated 78 regulations for the MU-8 subdistrict are listed in the below tables of this section. 79 80 1. Row House Building Form Standards: 81 a. Prohibitions: This use is prohibited on the following streets: 82 (i). 1300 South 83 (ii). West Temple 84 (iii). Main Street 85 86 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.1 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House H Height Maximum of 40’. All heights measured from established grade. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. F Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum 10’. Maximum 20’, unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review (Chapter 21A.59). 6 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 87 88 2. Multi-Family Residential, Storefront, and Vertical Mixed-Use Building Form 89 Standards: 90 (a). Ground floor residential uses are prohibited on the following streets: 91 (i). 1300 South 92 (ii). West Temple 93 (iii). Main Street 94 95 TABLE 21A.25.060.B.2 S Interior Side Yard Minimum of 5’ between row house building form and side property line, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 30’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. No setback required for common walls. R Rear Yard Minimum of 20’ U Uses Per Story Residential on all stories; live/work units permitted on ground level. E Entry Feature Each dwelling unit must include an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Dwelling units abutting a street must include an entry feature on street facing façade. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P with minimum 5’ width are required for each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building façade at finished grade along any side and rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. OS Open Space Area Each dwelling unit shall include a minimum open space area that is equal to at least 25% of the footprint of the individual unit, subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. SO Side/Interior Orientation Dwelling units not located directly abutting a street are permitted, provided the design standards for glass are complied with on the façade with the required entry feature. Lots for individual row house dwelling units without public street frontage are allowed subject to recording a final subdivision plat that: 1. Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a shared driveway; and 2. Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. 7 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 96 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Multi-family Residential/Storefront/Vertical Mixed Use H Height Maximum height of 90’. All heights measured from established grade. Buildings in excess of 50’ require design review in accordance with Chapter 21A.59. Rooftop decks and associated railing/parapet are allowed on any roof, including roofs at the maximum allowed height. GH Ground Floor Height Minimum ground floor height 14’. This requirement shall precede the ground floor height requirements established in Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1. a Front and Corner Side Yard Setback Minimum: 10'. Maximum 20’ but may be increased if the additional setback is used for plazas, courtyards, or outdoor dining areas unless a greater setback is required due to existing utility easements in which case the maximum setback shall be at the edge of the easement. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). B Required Build-To Minimum of 50% of street facing facade shall be built within 10’ of the front or corner side property line. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). S Interior Side Yard No minimum required, except when an interior side yard is abutting a zoning district that has a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum shall be 10’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. R Rear Yard No minimum required, except when a rear yard is abutting a zoning district with a maximum permitted building height of 45’ or less, then the minimum is 20’. For the purpose of this regulation, an alley that is a minimum of 10’ in width that separates a subject property from a different zoning district shall not be considered abutting. GU Ground Floor Use The required ground floor use space facing the street shall be limited to the following uses: retail goods establishments, retail service establishments, public service portions of businesses, restaurants, taverns/brewpubs, bar establishments, art galleries, theaters, or performing art facilities. This applies to all streets with a right of way that is wider than 66’. May be modified through Design Review process (Chapter 21A.59). E Ground Floor Dwelling Entrances Ground floor dwelling units abutting a street must have an allowed entry feature. See 21A.37.050.P for allowed entry features. Pedestrian connections, as per Subsection 21A.37.050.P are required to each required entry feature. U Upper Level Stepback When abutting a lot in a zoning district with a maximum building height of 30’ or less, the first full floor of the building above 30’ shall step back 10’ from the building facade at finished grade along the side or rear yard that is abutting the lot in the applicable zoning district. This regulation does not apply when a lot in a different zoning district is separated from the subject parcel by a street or alley. MW Midblock Walkway If a midblock walkway is shown in an adopted city plan on the subject property, a midblock walkway shall be provided. The midblock walkway must be a minimum of 10’ wide and include a minimum 6’ wide unobstructed path. BF Building Forms Per Lot Multiple buildings may be built on a single lot provided all of the buildings have frontage on a street. All buildings shall comply with all applicable standards. OS Open Space Area A minimum of 20% of the lot area shall be open space area subject to all other open space area requirements of Subsection 21A.25.060.C “Open Space Area.” A minimum of 20% of the required open space area shall include vegetation. 8 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 97 98 99 C. Open Space Area Requirements: When the building forms allowed in this 100 subdistrict require an open space area, the open space area shall comply with the following 101 standards: 102 103 1. Open Space Area: Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, 104 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living 105 spaces. Private balconies shall not be counted toward the minimum open space 106 area requirement. Required parking lot landscaping or perimeter parking lot 107 landscaping shall also not count toward the minimum open space area 108 requirement. 109 110 2. At least one open space area shall include a minimum dimension of at least 15’ 111 by 15’. 112 113 3. Trees shall be included at a rate where the mature spread of the tree will cover 114 at least 50% of the open space area. 115 116 4. Open space areas that are greater than 500 square feet must contain at least one 117 useable element, accessible to all building occupants, from the following list. 118 119 a. A bench for every 250 square feet of open space area; 120 b. A table for outdoor eating for every 500 square feet of open space 121 area; 122 c. An outdoor amenity. This is defined as an amenity that intends to 123 provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities including, but not 124 limited to, walking paths, playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sport 125 court or similar amenity intended to promote outdoor activity; 126 d. Landscaping that equals at least 33% of the landscaped area. 127 128 D. Parking Regulations: Specific parking standards applicable to this subdistrict are 129 listed below in Table 21A.25.060.D of this section. These are in addition to any other applicable 130 parking standards in Chapter 21A.44. 131 132 133 TABLE 21A.25.060.D DS Design Standards See Chapter 21A.37 for other applicable building configuration and design standards. Parking Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone SP Surface Parking Location Surface parking shall be located behind or to the side of a principal building provided: 9 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 134 135 E. Streetscape Regulations: Specific streetscape regulations applicable to the MU-8 136 subdistrict are listed below in Table 21A.25.060.E of this section. These regulations are in 137 addition to any other applicable streetscape standards in Title 21A. 138 139 TABLE 21A.25.060.E 140 141 142 F. Uses Not Associated with Building Form: Allowed uses that do not involve 143 construction of a building, such as parks and open space, are not required to comply with any 144 specific building form regulation. 145 146 G. Additional Regulations: The following regulations apply to properties located in 147 this subdistrict. 148 149 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 1. The parking is set back a minimum of 25’ from the front or corner side property line; and 2. The setback area shall be considered a landscaped yard and comply with the landscape yard planting requirements in Chapter 21A.46 and include: a. Trees with a minimum mature spread of 20’ planted at one tree for every 20’ of street frontage; and b. A 3’ tall solid wall or fence at the property line along the street. A hedge or other similar landscaped screen may be used in place of a wall or fence provided the plants are spaced no further than 18 inches on center across the entire frontage. GE Garage Entrances Street facing parking garage entrance doors shall have a minimum 20’ setback from the front property line and shall not exceed 50% of the first floor building width. One-way garage entry may not exceed 14’ in width; multiway garage entry may not exceed 26’ in width. Driveways for row house building forms must be located along an alley or accessed at the rear of the building. LS Loading and Service Areas Allowed behind or to the side of a principal building only. All service areas shall be screened or located within the building. EB Existing Buildings The reuse of existing buildings is exempt from the requirements of this table unless new parking area(s) are being added. New parking areas are subject to compliance with this subsection. Streetscape Regulation Applicability: Applies to all properties in the zone ST Street Trees Street trees are required and shall be provided as per Subsection 21A.48.060.D. SW Sidewalk Width Sidewalks shall have a minimum width of 10’. Additional sidewalk width shall be installed by the developer so there is a minimum sidewalk width of 10'. This applies to new buildings and to additions that increase the gross building square footage by more than 50%. This standard does not require removal of existing street trees, buildings, or portions thereof. For purposes of this section, sidewalk width is measured from the back of the park strip or required street tree if no park strip is provided, toward the abutting property line. SL Street Lights Street lights are required and shall be installed in compliance with the city’s Street Lighting Master Plan and Policy or its successor. 10 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 150 2. 21A.36 General Provisions 151 3. 21A.37 Design Standards 152 4. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 153 5. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 154 6. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 155 7. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 156 8. 21A.46 Signs 157 9. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 158 159 SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.A. That 160 Subsection 21A.33.010.A of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 161 Permitted Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 162 A. Permitted Uses: The uses specified as permitted uses in sections 21A.33.020, 163 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 164 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, are permitted provided that 165 they comply with the general standards set forth in part IV of this title and all other applicable 166 requirements of this title. 167 168 169 SECTION 4. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.33.010.B. That 170 Subsection 21A.33.010.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables: General Provisions: 171 Conditional Uses) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 172 B. Conditional Uses: The uses specified as conditional uses in sections 21A.33.020, 173 21A.33.025, 21A.33.030, 21A.33.035, 21A.33.040, 21A.33.050, 21A.33.060, 21A.33.070, and 174 21A.33.080 of this chapter, tables of permitted and conditional uses, shall be allowed provided they 175 are approved pursuant to the standards and procedures for conditional uses set forth in chapter 176 21A.54 of this title, and comply with all other applicable requirements of this title. 177 178 SECTION 5. Enacting the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.025. That 179 Chapter 21A.33 of the Salt Lake City Code (Land Use Tables) shall be, and hereby is amended to 180 include a new section, 21A.33.025 “Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Form Based 181 Mixed Use Districts” shall read and appear as follows: 182 21A.33.025: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR FORM BASED 183 MIXED USE DISTRICTS 11 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 184 Legend: C =Conditional P =Permitted 185 Permitted and Conditional Uses By DistrictUse MU-8 Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P Affordable Housing Incentives Development P Alcohol: Bar establishment (indoor)P Bar establishment (outdoor)P Brewpub (indoor)P1 Brewpub (outdoor)P1 Tavern (indoor)P1 Tavern (outdoor)C1 Amphitheater formal P Amphitheater informal P Animal, veterinary office P Antenna, communication tower P Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height C Art gallery P Artisan food production P2,3 Bed and breakfast P Bed and breakfast inn P Bed and breakfast manor P Bio-medical facility P3,4 Bus line station/terminal P5 Clinic (medical, dental)P Commercial food preparation P3 Community garden P Community recreation center P Crematorium P Daycare 12 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT center, adult P center, child P nonregistered home daycare P6 registered home daycare or preschool P6 Dwelling: Accessory Unit P Artists’ loft/studio P Assisted living facility (large)P Assisted living facility (limited capacity)P Assisted living facility (small)P Congregate care facility (large)P Congregate care facility (small)P Group home (large)P Group home (small)P Multi-family P Residential support (large)P Residential support (small)P Shared Housing P Single-family attached P Exhibition hall Farmers’ market P Financial institution P Funeral home P Gas station Government facility C Government facility requiring special design features for security purposes P5 Health and fitness facility P Heliport, accessory Home occupation P7 Hotel/motel P Industrial assembly C3 Laboratory, medical related P3 Library P Mixed use development P 13 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Mobile food business (operation in the public right of way)P Mobile food business (operation on private property)P Mobile food court P Municipal services uses including city utility uses and police and fire stations P Museum P Office P Office, publishing company P Open space on lots less than 4 acres in size P5 Park P Parking Commercial C8 Off site P8 Performing arts production facility P Place of worship P9 Plaza P Radio, television station P Railroad, passenger station P Reception center P Recreation (indoor)P Recreation (outdoor)P Research and development facility P3 Restaurant P Restaurant with drive-through facility Retail goods establishment P Retail service establishment P Retail service establishment, upholstery shop P Sales and display (outdoor)P School: College or university P K - 12 private P K - 12 public P Music conservatory P Professional and vocational P Seminary and religious institute P 14 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Small brewery P Social service mission and charity dining hall C Stadium P Storage, self Studio, art P Technology facility P3 Theater, live performance P Theater, movie P Utility, buildings or structure P10 Utility, transmission wire, line, pipe or pole P10 Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P Warehouse Warehouse, accessory P Wireless telecommunications facility (see Section 21A.40.090, Table 21A.40.090.E of this title) 186 187 Qualifying provisions: 188 1. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Section 21A.36.300, "Alcohol 189 Related Establishments", of this title. 190 2. Must contain retail component for on-site food sales. 191 3. Consult the water use and/or consumption limitations of Subsection 21A.33.010.D.1. 192 4. Prohibited within 1/2 mile of a residential use if the facility produces hazardous or 193 radioactive waste as defined by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality 194 administrative rules. 195 5. Subject to conformance with the provisions of Chapter 21A.59, "Design Review", of this 196 title. 197 6. Subject to Section 21A.36.130 of this title. 198 7. Subject to Section 21A.36.030 of this title. 199 8. Parking lots, garages or parking structures, proposed as the only principal use on a 200 property that has frontage on a public street that would result in a building demolition 201 are prohibited subject to the provisions of Subsection 21A.30.010.F.3. 202 9. If a place of worship is proposed to be located within 600 feet of a tavern, bar 203 establishment, or brewpub, the place of worship must submit a written waiver of 204 spacing requirement as a condition of approval. 205 10. Subject to conformance to the provisions in Subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. 206 207 Commented [KP1]: Need these notes and to probably fix the superscript numbering in the table. 15 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 208 SECTION 6. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.34.090. That 209 Section 21A.34.090 of the Salt Lake City Code (Specific District Regulations: Overlay Districts: 210 SSSC South State Street Corridor Overlay District) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a 211 new subsection G while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said section: 212 G. Exemptions: The MU-8 Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict, and FB-UN2 Form 213 Based Urban Neighborhood 2 Subdistrict are exempt from the requirements in this Section. 214 215 SECTION 7. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.36.020.C. That 216 Subsection 21A.36.020.C of the Salt Lake City Code (General Provisions: Conformance With 217 Lot and Bulk Controls: Height Exceptions) shall be, and hereby is amended to read and appear as 218 follows. 219 C. Height Exceptions: Exceptions to the maximum building height in all zoning 220 districts are allowed as indicated in Table 21A.36.020.C of this subsection. 221 222 TABLE 21A.36.020.C 223 HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts Chimney As required by local, State or Federal regulations All zoning districts Church steeples or spires No limit All zoning districts Elevator/stairway tower or bulkhead 16 feet All Commercial, Manufacturing, Downtown, FB-UN2, FB- MU11, MU-8, RO, R-MU, RMF-45, RMF-75, RP, BP, I, UI, A, PL and PL-2 Districts Flagpole Maximum height of the zoning district in which the flagpole is located or 60 feet, whichever is less. Conditional use approval is required for additional height All zoning districts Light poles for sport fields such as ballparks, stadiums, Maximum height of the zoning district or 90 feet whichever is greater. Special exception approval is required for any All zoning districts that allow sport field activities and 16 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Type Extent Above Maximum Building Height Allowed By the District Applicable Districts soccer fields, golf driving ranges, and similar uses1 further additional height or if the lights are located closer than 30 feet from adjacent residential structures stadiums excluding parks less than 4 acres in size Mechanical equipment parapet wall 5 feet All zoning districts, other than the FP, FR-1, FR-2, FR-3, and Open Space Districts 224 Note: 225 1. Lighting shall be shielded to eliminate excessive glare or light into adjacent properties 226 and have cutoffs to protect the view of the night sky. 227 228 229 SECTION 8. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. That 230 Subsection 21A.37.050.A.1.b. of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards 231 Defined: Ground Floor Use and Visual Interest: Ground Floor Use Only) shall be, and hereby is 232 amended to read and appear as follows: 233 b. The MU-8 (Form Based Mixed Use 8 Subdistrict), TSA (Transit Station Area), R-MU-35 234 (Residential Mixed-Use), R-MU-45 (Residential Mixed-Use), FB-UN2 (Form Based Urban 235 Neighborhood), FB-MU11UN3 (Form Based Urban NeighborhoodMixed Use 11 236 Subdistrict), FBUN-SC (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Core), FBUN- 237 SE (Form Based Urban Neighborhood Special Corridor Edge), CSHBD (Sugar House 238 Business District) are not subject to the 16' minimum floor to ceiling height required by this 239 section. A zoning district that has a similar requirement, that requirement shall apply. 240 241 SECTION 9. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.37.060. That Table 242 21A.37.060 of the Salt Lake City Code (Design Standards: Design Standards Required in Each 243 Zoning District: Table 21A.37.060), shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subpart H 244 while retaining all other subparts, tables and notes in said table: 245 H. Form Based Mixed Use Districts 246 District Standard (Code Section)MU-8 17 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050.A.1) 803 Ground floor use + visual interest (%) (21A.37.050.A.2) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.B.3) 70 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.B.4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 601 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 15 Reflective Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050.C.1) 0 Reflective Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050.C.2) 0 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050.D) 40 Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.E) 30 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050.F) 200 Upper floor stepback (feet) (21A.37.050.G.4) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050.H) X Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050.I) X Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050.J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050.K.1) X2 Ground floor residential entrances for dwellings with X 18 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 Notes: 269 1. This may be reduced to twenty percent (20%) if the ground floor is within one of the 270 following building types: urban house, two-family, cottage, and row house; subject to 271 the building type being allowed in the zone. 272 2. Except where specifically authorized by the zone. 273 3. For buildings with street facing facades over 100' in length, a minimum of 30% of 274 the façade length shall be an “active use” as defined in Subsection individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L) Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050.M) X Tree canopy coverage (%) (21A.37.050.P.1) 66% Minimum vegetation standards (21A.37.050.P.2) X Street trees (21A.37.050.P.3)X Soil volume (21A.37.050.P.4) Minimize curb cuts (21A.37.050.P.5) X Overhead cover (21A.37.050.P.6) X Streetscape landscaping (21A.37.050.P.7) X Height transitions: angular plane for adjacent zone districts (21A.37.050.Q) X Horizontal articulation (21A.37.050.R) 19 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 275 21A.37.050.A.1. Except for the rowhouse building form, residential units shall 276 not count as an “active use” toward the 30% minimum. 277 278 SECTION 10. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2. 279 That Subsection 21A.40.120.D.1.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Regulations of General 280 Applicability: Regulations of Fences, Wall and Hedges: Design Requirements) shall be, and 281 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 282 2. Nonresidential districts (chapters 21A.265 through 21A.34 of this title: form based 283 mixed use districts, commercial districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway 284 districts, special purpose districts and overlay districts): 285 a. Allowed Materials: Fences and walls shall be made of high quality, durable 286 materials that require minimal maintenance. Acceptable materials for fencing 287 in nonresidential districts include, but are not limited to, chainlink, prewoven 288 chainlink with slats, wood, brick, tilt-up concrete, masonry block, stone, 289 metal, composite/recycled materials or other manufactured materials or 290 combination of materials commonly used for fencing. Other materials of 291 similar quality and durability, but not listed herein, may be used upon 292 approval by the zZoning aAdministrator through an administrative 293 interpretation application. 294 b. Prohibited Materials: Fences or walls in nonresidential districts shall not be 295 constructed of or contain: 296 (1) Scrap materials such as scrap lumber and scrap metal. 297 (2) Materials not typically used or designated/manufactured for fencing 298 such as metal roofing panels, corrugated or sheet metal, tarps or 299 plywood. 300 301 SECTION 11. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-A. That 302 Table 21A.44.040-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 303 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum and Maximum Off Street Parking) shall be, and hereby is 304 amended to read and appear as follows: 20 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement Maximum Parking Allowed General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Vehicle Stacking and Drive-Through Facilities: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.6 Outdoor Sales/Display/Leasing/Auction Areas: See Subsection 21A.44.040.A.7 RESIDENTIAL USES Household Living Artists’ loft/studio 1.5 spaces per DU 1 space per DU 0.5 spaces per DU No Minimum No Maximum Manufactured home Mobile home Single-family (attached) Single-family (detached) 2 spaces per DU Single-family cottage development building form 1 space per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum Twin home Two-family 2 spaces per DU 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU, not including recreational vehicle parking spaces Multi-family Studio and 1 bedrooms: 1 space per DU, Studio and 1+bedrooms: 1 space per DU Studio: No minimum No Minimum All Contexts: Studio & 1 Bedroom: 2 spaces per DU; 2+ 21 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 2+ bedrooms 1.25 space per DU 1 bedroom: 0.5 space per Du 2+ bedrooms: 1 space per DU bedrooms: 3 spaces per DU Group Living Assisted living facility Nursing care facility 1 space for every 6 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 4 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 3 DU; See Table Note A 1 space for every 8 infirmary or nursing home beds; plus 1 space for every 6 rooming units; plus 1 space for every 4 DU; See Table Note A No Minimum No Maximum Congregate Care Facility (large) 1 space for each family, plus 1 space for every 4 individual bedrooms, plus 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum Congregate Care Facility (small) 3 spaces per facility and 1 space for every 2 support staff present No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per bedroom plus 1 space for each support staff present Group home Residential support 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 6 persons design capacity; See Table Note A 1 space per 4 persons design capacity; See Table Note A No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 persons design capacity; See Table Note A Dormitory, fraternity, sorority 1 space per 2 persons design capacity 1 space per 3 persons design capacity 1 space per 4 persons design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 1 persons design capacity Rooming (boarding) house 1 space per 2 guest rooms 1 space per 3 guest rooms 1 space per 4 guest rooms No Minimum No Maximum Shared housing 0.5 spaces per unit 0.25 spaces per unit No Minimum No Maximum Table Notes: 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 305 306 307 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed PUBLC, INSTITUTIONAL, AND CIVIC USES Community and Cultural Facilities Art gallery Studio, Art Exhibition hall Museum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Crematorium Daycare center, adult Daycare center, child 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 23 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Homeless resource center Library Community correctional facility Community recreation center Jail 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Government facility Social service mission and charity dining hall 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area No Minimum No Maximum Municipal service use, including city utility use and police and fire station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per service vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Club/loungelodge Meeting hall of membership organization 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 8 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 10 seats in main assembly area No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area Convent/monastery 1 space per 4 persons design capacity 1 space per 6 persons design capacity 1 space per 8 persons design capacity No Minimum No Maximum Funeral home 1 space per 4 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 5 seats in main assembly area 1 space per 6 seats in main assembly area No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 4 seats in main assembly areas Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No maximum Place of worship 1 space per 6 seats or 1 space 1 space per 8 seats or 1 space per 400 1 space per 10 seats or 1 space No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 24 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT per 300 sq. ft., whichever is less sq. ft., whichever is less per 500 sq. ft, whichever is less space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater Fairground See Table Note B No Maximum Philanthropic use See Table Note B All Contexts: 1 space per 3.5 seats or 1 space per 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater All Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas Zoological park Ambulance service See Table Note B Cemetery Plazas Park Open space No Minimum No Maximum Educational Facilities College and university 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. office, research, and library area, plus 1 space per 10 seats in assembly areas K-12 private K-12 public Elementary or Middle: 1 space per 20 students design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 25 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT High Schools: 1 space per 8 students design capacity Dance/music studio Music conservatory Professional and vocational Professional and vocational (with outdoor activities) Seminary and religious institute 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Healthcare Facilities Clinic (medical, dental)4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. All Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Blood donation center 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Hospital Hospital, including accessory lodging facility 1 space per 3 patient beds design capacity 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 2 patient beds design capacity Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. 26 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 308 309 310 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 Maximum Parking Allowed COMMERCIAL USES Agricultural and Animal Uses Greenhouse Kennel Pound Veterinary office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Cremation service, animal Kennel on lots of 5 acres or larger 21 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Poultry farm or processing plant Raising of furbearing animals Slaughterhouse 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum 27 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Agricultural use Community garden Farmer’s market Grain elevator Pet cemetery Stable Stockyard Urban farm No Minimum Botanical garden See Table Note B Recreation and Entertainment Auditorium Theater, live performance Theater, movie 1 space per 4 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 6 seats in assembly areas 1 space per 8 seats in assembly areas No Minimum All Contexts: 1 space per 3 seats in assembly areas Amphitheater Athletic Field Stadium See Table Note B Tennis court (principal use)2 spaces per court Bowling 2 spaces per lane No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per court or lane Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: No Maximum Convention center Swimming pool, skating rink or natatorium 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Health and fitness facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces 28 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Performing arts production facility Reception center Recreation (indoor)3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. sq. ft.per 1,000 sq. ft. Recreational vehicle park (minimum 1 acre)1 space per designated camping or RV spot Amusement park See Table Note B Recreation (outdoor)See Table Note B No Maximum Food and Beverage Services Brewpub Restaurant Tavern Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.; Outdoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Indoor tasting/seating area: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Outdoor tasting/seating area: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit, Urban Center, and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area General Context: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. indoor tasting/seating area All Contexts: Outdoor tasting/seating area: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Office, Business, and Professional Services Check cashing/payday loan business Dental laboratory/research facility 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 29 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Financial institution Research and laboratory facilities Office (excluding medical and dental clinic and office) 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail Sales & Services Photo finishing lab Electronic repair shop Furniture repair shop Upholstery shop No Minimum 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Radio, television station 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Store, Convenience 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Auction, Indoor Store, Department 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. 30 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Fashion oriented development Flea market (indoor) Flea market (outdoor) Store, Mass merchandising Store, Pawn shop Store, Specialty Retail goods establishment Retail service establishment Store, Superstore and hypermarket Store, Warehouse club ft. Urban Center and Neighborhood Center Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail shopping center over 55,000 sq. ft. usable floor area Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Up to 100,000 sq. ft: 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Above 100,000 sq. ft: 1.25 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 1.75 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: Up to 100,000 sq. ft.: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft., above 100,000 sq. ft.: 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Plant and garden shop with outdoor retail sales area 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1.5 31 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lodging Facilities Bed and breakfast All Contexts: 1.25 spaces per guest bedroom Hotel/motel 1 space per guest bedroom 0.5 spaces per guest bedroom No Minimum All Contexts: 1.5 spaces per guest bedroom Vehicles and Equipment Vehicle Auction 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay 21 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum No Maximum Automobile part sales Automobile and truck repair sales/rental and service Boat/recreational vehicle sales and service (indoor) Equipment rental (indoor and/or outdoor) 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area plus 1 space per service bay No Minimum All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of indoor sales/leasing/office area, plus 1 space per service bay 32 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Equipment, heavy (rental, sales, service) Manufactured/mobile home sales and service Recreational vehicle (RV) sales and service Truck repair sales and rental (large) Car wash Car wash as accessory use to gas station or convenience store that sells gas No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Gas station 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum General Context: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. 33 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Bus line yard and repair facility Impound lot Limousine service Taxicab facility Tire distribution retail/wholesale 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per commercial fleet vehicle No Minimum No Maximum Adult Entertainment Establishments Sexually oriented business 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum All Contexts: 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Table Notes: A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 311 312 313 DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Minimum Parking Requirement General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Land Use All zoning districts not RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35,R-MU - 45, SR-3, FB-UN1, D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, Maximum Parking Allowed 34 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT listed in another context area FB-SE, SSSC Overlay FB-MU11, FB- SC, R-MU, MU- 8 TRANSPORTATION USES Airport Heliport Determined by Airport Authority No Maximum Bus line station/terminal Intermodal transit passenger hub Railroad, passenger station Transportation terminal, including bus, rail and trucking No Minimum Urban Center and Transit Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 1 space per 150 average daily passenger boardings Railroad, repair shop Truck freight terminal 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft., plus 1 space per fleet vehicle generally stored on-site No Minimum Railroad, freight terminal facility No Minimum No Maximum INDUSTRIAL USES Manufacturing and Processing Artisan food production Bakery, commercial 1 space per 1000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 0.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 35 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Neighborhood Center and General Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of production area, plus 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) Processing center (outdoor) 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail 10.5 space per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail No Minimum No Maximum All Contexts: 7 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office/retail Automobile salvage and recycling (indoor) Blacksmith shop Bottling plant Brewery/Small Brewery Chemical manufacturing and/or storage Commercial food preparation Distillery Drop forge industry Explosive manufacturing and storage Food processing Heavy manufacturing Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste Industrial assembly Jewelry fabrication 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum 36 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Laundry, commercial Light manufacturing Manufacturing and processing, food Paint manufacturing Printing plant Processing center (indoor) Recycling Sign painting/fabrication Studio, motion picture Welding shop Winery Woodworking mill 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. Collection station Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Extractive industry Refinery, petroleum products No minimum No Minimum No Maximum Storage and Warehousing Air cargo terminals and package delivery facility Building materials distribution No minimum No maximum Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage Package delivery facility Warehouse No minimum No minimum No maximum 37 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Warehouse, accessory to retail and wholesale business (maximum 5,000 square foot floor plate) Wholesale distribution Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus 1 space per 30 storage units 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office All Contexts: 1 space for every 15 storage units Contractor’s yard/office 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution Storage (outdoor) Storage and display (outdoor) Storage, public (outdoor) No Minimum No Maximum PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC UTILITY USES Utility: Building or structure Antenna, communication tower Antenna, communication tower, exceeding the maximum building height in the zone Large wind energy system Solar array Utility: Electric generation facility No Minimum No Maximum 38 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT Utility Sewage treatment plant Utility: Solid waste transfer station Utility: Transmission wire, line, pipe or pole Wireless telecommunications facility ACCESSORY USES Accessory Dwelling Unit See Section 21A.40.200: Accessory Dwelling Units Accessory guest and servant’s quarter Living quarter for caretaker or security guard 1 space per DU No Minimum All Contexts: 4 spaces per DU Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.1 space per 1,000 sq. ft.No Minimum No Maximum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Retail, sales and service accessory use when located within a principal building and operated primarily for No Minimum Transit and Urban Center Contexts: 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. 39 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT the convenience of employees Neighborhood Center Context: 3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. General Context: 4 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Warehouse, accessory Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title Heliport, accessory Reverse vending machine Storage, accessory (outdoor) No Maximum TEMPORARY USES Mobile food business (operation in public right- of-way) Mobile food business (operation on private property) Mobile food court Vending cart, private property Vending cart, public property Farm stand, seasonal No minimum, unless required by temporary use permit or as determined by the Zoning Administrator No Maximum Table Notes: 40 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT A. Facilities that are (a) occupied by persons whose right to live together is protected by the federal Fair Housing Act, and that (b) occupy a building originally constructed for another residential use shall have the same parking requirements as the residential use for which the building was constructed. B. Parking requirements to be determined by the transportation director based on considerations of factors such as estimated facility use, vehicle traffic to the facility, transit use to the facility, potential traffic congestion, and likelihood of overflow parking in surrounding neighborhoods. 314 315 41 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 316 SECTION 12. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.040-C. That 317 Table 21A.44.040-C of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 318 Required Off Street Parking: Minimum Bicycle Parking Requirements) shall be, and hereby is 319 amended to read and appear as follows: 42 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 320 321 322 323 324 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit Context Use All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU- 35, R-MU-45, SR-3, FB- UN1, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBD1, CSHBD2 D-1, D-3, D- 4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB- SC, R- MU, MU-8 Residential Uses 1 per 5 units 1 per 4 units 1 per 3 units 1 per 2 units Public, Institutional, and Civic Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. Commercial Uses 1 per 10,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft 1 per 4,000 sq. ft.1 per 2,000 sq. ft. Industrial Uses 1 per 15,000 sq. ft.1 per 8,000 sq. ft.1 per 5,000 sq. ft.1 per 3,000 sq. ft. *For all uses: In determining the minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required, fractional spaces are rounded to the nearest whole number, with one-half counted as an additional space 43 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 325 326 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.060-A. That 327 Table 21A.44.060-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 328 Parking Location And Design: Parking Location And Setback Requirements) shall be, and 329 hereby is amended to read and appear as follows: 44 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 330 TABLE 21A.44.060-A: PARKING LOCATION AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: N = parking prohibited between lot line and front line of the principal building Zoning District Front Lot Line Corner Side Lot Line Interior Side Lot Line Rear Lot Line GENERAL CONTEXT Residential (FR Districts, RB, RMF, RO) FR 6 ft. R-1, R-2, SR-1, SR-2 N Parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city standards is exempt from this restriction. 0 ft. RMF-30 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF- 75, RO N 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district. Limited to 1 side yard except for single-family attached lots. 0 ft. Commercial and Manufacturing (CC, CS, CG, M-1, M-2, SNB) CC 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CS 15 ft. CG N. See also Subsection 21A.26.070 .I M-1 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district M-2 15 ft. 0 ft.; or 50 ft. when abutting any residential district Special Purpose Districts A 0 ft. AG, AG-2, AG-5, AG-20 N 0 ft. BP 8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district EI 10 ft.30 ft.30 ft.20 ft. FP 20 ft.6 ft.0 ft. 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT I 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any residential district MH 0 ft. OS 10 ft. PL 30 ft. PL-2 20 ft. 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any residential district RP 30 ft.8 ft.; or 30 ft. when abutting any residential district NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER CONTEXT CB, CN, SNB N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district R-MU-35, R- MU-45 Surface Parking: N Parking Structures: 45' or located behind principal building Limited to 1 side yard, 0 ft,; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district RB, SR-3, FB-UN1, FB- SE N 0 ft. URBAN CENTER CONTEXT CSHBD1 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any residential district CSHBD2 N 0 ft.; or 7 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district D-2 Surface Parking: N Surface parking must be located behind the principal structure and comply with other requirements of Subsection 21A.30.010 .F Parking Structures: N 0 ft. MU Surface Parking: 25 ft. or located behind principal structure Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; limited to 1 side yard 0 ft. TSA-T See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 0 ft. TRANSIT CONTEXT D-1 D-3 See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.1 D-4 G-MU See Subsection 21A.44.060 .B.1, 21A.30.010 .F and 21A.31.010 .H 0 ft. 46 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT FB-UN2, FB- UN3MU11, FB-SC MU-8 N TSA-C See Subsection 21A.44.060.B.2 R-MU Surface Parking: 30 ft. Parking Structures: 45 ft. or located behind principal structure 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district Surface parking at least 30 ft. from front lot line 0 ft.; or 10 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district UI 0 ft; Hospitals: 30 ft.0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 0 ft.; or 15 ft. when abutting any 1-2 family residential district; Hospitals: 10 ft. 331 332 47 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 333 SECTION 14. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Table 21A.44.080-A. That 334 Table 21A.44.080-A of the Salt Lake City Code (Off Street Parking, Mobility and Loading: 335 Drive-Through Facilities and Vehicle Stacking Areas) shall be, and hereby is amended to read 336 and appear as follows: 48 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 337 TABLE 21A.44.080-A: REQUIRED VEHICLE STACKING SPACES: General Context Neighborhood Center Context Urban Center Context Transit ContextUse All zoning districts not listed in another context area RB, SNB, CB, CN, R-MU-35, R- MU-45, SR-3, FB-UNl, FB-SE, SSSC Overlay D-2, MU, TSA-T, CSHBDl, CSHBD2 D-J, D-3, D-4, G-MU, TSA-C, UI, FB-UN2, FB-MU11, FB-SC, R- MU, MU-8 Car Wash, Self-Service 3 spaces per bay or stall 2 spaces per bay or stall Car Wash, Automated 4 spaces per lane or stall 3 spaces per lane or stall Food and Beverage Service Uses 5 spaces per service lane 4 spaces per service lane Other Uses 3 spaces per service lane 3 spaces per service lane 49 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 339 340 SECTION 15. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b. 341 That Subsection 21A.52.050.G.4.b of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Zoning Incentives: 342 Affordable Housing Incentives: Incentives) shall be, and hereby is amended to include a new 343 subpart (2) “Form Based Mixed Use Districts” as shown below and renumber the existing 344 subparts as follows with no changes to the associated tables: 345 (2) Form Based Mixed Use Districts: Zoning District Permitted Maximum Height with Incentive MU-8 Two additional stories with administrative Design Review. 346 347 (23) Commercial Districts 348 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 349 (34) Form-based districts: 350 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 351 (45) Downtown districts: 352 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 353 (56) Other districts: 354 [codifier: no change to the associated table] 355 SECTION 16. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 356 first publication. 357 358 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. 359 360 361 ______________________________ 362 CHAIRPERSON 363 50 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 364 ATTEST: 365 366 ______________________________ 367 CITY RECORDER 368 369 370 Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 371 372 373 Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 374 375 376 ______________________________ 377 MAYOR 378 379 ______________________________ 380 CITY RECORDER 381 382 (SEAL) 383 384 Bill No. ________ of 2024. 385 Published: ______________. 386 Ordinance adopting MU8 (legislative)v6 387 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 6/10/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 6/10/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 6/10/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson april.patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Steve Bloch as a member of the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board. . ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 June 10, 2024 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Petro, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry and Trails Advisory Board. Steve Bloch to be appointed for a three year term starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 6/24/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 6/24/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 6/24/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson april.patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Michael Dodd as a member of the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. . . ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 June 24, 2024 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Petro, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Parks, National Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails Advisory Board. Michael Dodd to be appointed for a three year term starting from date of City Council advice and consent. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ______________________________ Date Received: 6/11/2024 Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Date Sent to Council: 6/11/2024 TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 6/11/2024 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff Office of the Mayor SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: Human Rights Commission STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson april.patterson@slcgov.com DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Emily Khan as a member of the Human Rights Commission. . ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor OFFICE OF THE MAYOR P.O. BOX 145474 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM TEL 801-535-7704 June 11, 2024 Salt Lake City Council 451 S State Street Room 304 PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 Dear Council Member Petro, Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Human Rights Commission. Emily Khan to be appointed for a four year term starting from date of City Council advice and consent and ending on Monday, December 28, 2028. I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment. Respectfully, Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/12/2024 8:54 Dayna McKee Sports Entertainment District Dear Council, I do not support public funding for this project. The SEG group should find a way to pay for this without needing additional taxpayer dollars. Curiously, the legislature and the City can find money to pay for a Sports Entertainment District, something that will be available only to those with the means to enjoy it, yet somehow cannot find enough funding for the homelessness crisis facing our city and state. Not to mention the dire housing crisis, the lack of affordable childcare, and the health disparities in our community, if we are to increase taxes, we should be funding projects that tackle the most pressing issues we face today. There is no equity in a sports entertainment district; if we are to fund anything, we should fund the basic needs of our community rather than a billionaire's pet project. I do support bringing sports and entertainment to our city as well as updating the infrastructure of downtown to be more walkable, sustainable, and equitable. However, I do not support giving public money to SEG to fund this project. Thank you for your time. 6/12/2024 9:14 Mindy Wilson Mayors Raise Hi Eva— I think a 25% raise for the mayor—just to “keep up with the Joneses”—is way too much. 10% raise is plenty generous & still double what city employees are set to get. Thank you. Mindy Wilson 6/12/2024 9:15 Anonymous Constituent .5% tax increase I am strongly opposed to the "Downtown Development" tax increase. Why do I, who rarely go downtown, have to subsidize a billionaire's development and profits? This is unfair. I am 80 years old and the cost of living in SLC is becoming prohibitive. 6/12/2024 9:16 Ben Throndsen Illegal Scooter Riders just curious what can be done about those riding commercial electric scooters while breaking city code. I have reported to the scooter companies and they say they have no recourse. I have reported it to the police and they say they have no time/jurisdiction, have reported to the city and they say talk to the scooter people. These riders are violating city code and the companies that are making money off them are apparently supposed to police their riders. Who has jurisdiction over this illegal activity that I can talk to? Thanks Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/12/2024 9:17 Deborah Ellis Remaking Downtown SLC Hello all City Council members, I've lived in SLC for 30 years and have great concerns for the hastily proposed plans to push through the extreme razing of our downtown as a result of one billionaire's purchase of a hockey team. There is no transparency to the plans really; big decisions not yet made and not yet reviewed by the public, and yet there is a looming deadline for voting on the proposal which is based upon an increase of SLC sales tax. As with many legislative decisions and bills as of the past few years in particular, they are announced in kind of a back-door manner and voted on, often in the middle of the night with an immediate deadline and no opportunity for public input. This proposal is really dressed up with little concrete information and as well is on a fast track to being voted on. There are more questions remaining about the plans than there is known information. To use an old expression, I think that SLC (developers, government, wealthy class) has gotten way too big for its britches and biting off all this in the face of another Olympics is just too much and will be hurting the many people who can't even afford housing here anymore. We need to focus our tax monies on roads, public safety, transportation and homelessness, rather than creating new entertainment venues for a handful of wealthy citizens. Why do the taxpayers have to foot the bill for a billionaire's project that will provide hockey (expensive hockey) to mainly the well off and millionaires who can afford to attend? Based on estimates of the actual costs of pro hockey games in other states, it may cost five hundred dollars for a family of four to attend one game. We have been subject to tax increase after tax increase for the recent years of the current mayor, and it is poised to continue. One tax cut sandwiched in between endless increases does not make it any easier for the average taxpayer. Since the millionaires, billionaires and the state of Utah will be the beneficiaries of this great plan to remake downtown SLC, the millionaires, billionaires and the state of Utah should foot the bill. There was a decision to stop taxing food in Utah, but that decision was made probably 18 months ago and still hasn't gone into effect. Yet if this sales tax increase passes, it will go into effect right away. Such double standards. There have been several other sites proposed for business development around a new hockey arena. Why does half of downtown SLC need to be torn down ("revitalized") to accommodate new businesses ("sports district") when a sports district can be newly constructed around any other new venue with more space to develop than there is in downtown SLC. Half of downtown is already inaccessible due to roadwork and current construction projects. I am 72 years old, still paying a mortgage, and have already been seeing for a number of years that I'm being taxed out of my home which I have owned for 27 years. Yet my house payment is less than any studio apartment I can move to in the city, or probably less than any studio apartment all along the Wasatch front. Please do not go forward with this pressurized plan to "revitalize" downtown SLC, based on the narrow financial interests of one man or a very small group of wealthy people, which will not benefit the great majority of taxpayers who are being targeted to finance all of it. Again, the state of Utah has alot of funds that should be applied to this project, instead of all taxpayers paying for all these things which they will not be able to use due to cost for the majority of residents. In good faith, Deborah Ellis 6/12/2024 9:19 Michael Walker Taxpayers dont want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Michael Walker Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/12/2024 10:57 Douglas Forney FW: (EXTERNAL) Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Douglas Forney 6/12/2024 13:56 Sonja & Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention District SLCity Council How short sighted can our city leaders be? When you are looking to make money & fame by creating a Sports, Entertainment, Culture, Convention District, rather than respecting some of Salt Lake's historic venues. I am totally against rebuilding Abravanel Hall. It is a beautiful building that was built in 1979 as Symphony Hall. Please do not try to remodel this historic and beautiful building! Salt Lake resident, Sonja Chesley 6/12/2024 14:18 Rainey Tadehara SB 272 We have a beautiful skyline and it would be a shame if we destroyed it for money. That being said. If you choose to go that route, it would be a significant snub to the immigrants that helped build salt lake to have started today's city council meeting dedicating a day to immigrants and refugees and then refusing to include them in the town they built. Thanks, Rainey Tadehara 6/12/2024 14:21 Kim Paturzo Support Livable Streets Hello, I'm contacting you on behalf of neighbors and myself. Please hear me when I say Livable Streets make our streets safer. We’ve seen it firsthand in the adjoining neighborhood to us. Our neighborhood is a byway that bicyclists, families and the like utilize. Our street needs the continuation of the street calming effects. Please support us in making our street safe. Please support Livable Streets. Thank you, Kim Paturzo 6/12/2024 14:24 Jesse Plautz Intermountain Healthcare || Parking Ramp Hello- I have quick feedback that I hope you’ll consider Regarding the recent plans for the Intermountain Healthcare Hospital in the Sears Block. I’m happy to hear distaste from the council about the plan. The City needs to preserve Main Street as a pedestrian and bike thoroughfare as much as possible. The parking ramp on Main Street is a big problem. I propose the following: Put the garage access ramps on 800 south, on the east and west side of Main Street. tunnel under Main Street without disrupting it. Build a beautiful pedestrian and bike thoroughfare under the skywalk. Thank you for your continued efforts in making SLC more walkable and less car centric. I see your work and I’m happy that you see the same opportunities for “new urbanism” as I do. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/13/2024 9:05 Jack Weis 1/2 Stadiums and "Cultural Districts" Dear Chris, The fad of the year seems to be pro sports stadiums: first baseball, then hockey, now some sort of basketball / hockey / convention mashup at the Delta Center. The City seems to be pretty gung-ho about these plans, to the point of wanting to commit the proceeds of a sales tax hike worth nearly a billion dollars to it. I think that would be a serious mistake. I have no general objection to big public-works projects, or even to sports stadiums, but this one is being sold to us under false pretenses. I will explain my objections to the arguments we have been given below. The stadium will pay for itself with increased business activity downtown. This almost never happens, and most economists agree that building stadiums is a poor use of taxpayer funds if the goal is economic development. This is an investment in world-class amenities for our city. The facility and the teams which play there will be privately owned. No bank on the planet would invest a billion dollars in exchange for a 0% ownership stake in any venture, no matter how good its business plan is. The taxpayers receive nothing for our investment beyond the vague hope that this will spur economic growth, which it won't - see above. If we were looking at buying a 49% stake in Ryan Smith's venture, maybe I'd think differently about this - but so far we have only been offered the opportunity to give Ryan Smith a billion dollars for free, while he pockets the profits of this "private" venture. This stadium will promote upward mobility. The stadium complex will further enrich Ryan Smith, already one of the wealthiest people in the state, via a tax on the goods and services purchased by everyday people in SLC. The players themselves will be paid well but will primarily come from out of state; the prospect of becoming a pro hockey player is hardly a realistic path toward upward mobility for our children. Utah already can't find enough construction workers, so that industry hardly needs the stimulus. Beyond construction, the only jobs we can realistically expect this to create are custodial and food-service jobs. That sector already struggles to hire people because those jobs are low-paying, dead-end jobs. Ryan Smith says the financials on this look amazing! Ryan Smith is an experienced businessman and has amassed a significant fortune in his own right. If this project is really going to be drowning in money, he shouldn't have any trouble lining up financing for it without going cap-in- hand to the taxpayer. If no bank anywhere is willing to lend him the money for this project, and he is unwilling to commit his own personal fortune to cover the gap, that ought to tell you something. Utahns are extremely excited about pro sports! Then why can't it be funded through ticket revenues & televising deals alone? This stadium will showcase our state to the world! Exactly zero CEOs are going to fly into SLC from New York or Shanghai or Bangalore for the sole purpose of watching an obscure NHL team play only to be wowed by our state, which they had previously never heard of, and you know it. For our skiing or national parks, maybe, but not this. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/13/2024 9:05 Jack Weis 2/2 CONTINUED!! Stadiums and "Cultural Districts" But Natalie Gochnour said it was a good idea! Professor Gochnour is a very smart lady, but she would say literally anything if she thought it would move us closer to her ideal of a "high-amenity, mid-size city," regardless of the cost. She has not, to my knowledge at least, given us any numbers on what sort of return we can expect from this investment. If she were to make a sincere effort to quantify the benefits of this project, I strongly suspect she'd be in for an unpleasant surprise, as has been the case in every other city to fall for the sports-driven development meme. Our tax burden isn't all that heavy and it's important to invest in our city! I agree. Start by building the Trax downtown loop and extensions to Glendale and Research Park so car-free living can become realistic in this city. Or finish building out the Google Fiber network, or build a couple pilot-scale air purifiers for our winter inversions, or use the money to incentivize pollution controls at area industrial facilities, or establish more slots for medical training at the U of U, or send all the homeless people to rehab / assisted living / job training as needed, or establish a scholarship for SLC residents studying needed subjects at the U of U to get free tuition, or build a bunch of apartments downtown, or hire people to streamline and digitize the process for building permits, business licenses, and such. I'm sure you've thought about this more than me, but there are hundreds of better ways you could use a billion dollars to improve life in SLC. This stadium proposal as currently conceived, in short, is little more than welfare for the wealthiest people in our state, and I hope you will vote no on any proposal to fund it with tax dollars taken from the less-fortunate. Regards, Jack Weis 6/13/2024 9:14 Helen Thatcher IHC Hospital Proposal I am very surprised at the magnitude of IHC’s proposal for the 8th S and State Street location. When first proposed, my immediate thought was gridlock. It’s been a year and the SLC traffic is overwhelmingly worse and the project is so much bigger than I thought. Getting downtown is already a problem. I wish I could suggest the solution but the hospital will only add to the traffic situation. Even the employees are not going to want to walk the 4+ blocks from a Trac station. Please consider the serious traffic issue before approving such a project. Thank you for listening. Helen Thatcher 6/13/2024 4:07 PM Kenna k Kies Revitalization of Salt Lake City/ Salt Palace Hello, I hope this message gets to you well. I’m messaging an inquiry about the revitalization efforts in Downtown Salt Lake. Please don’t allow the Smith Entertainment Group (SEG) demolish part or all of the Salt Palace. While I may not live in SLC, I do spend a ton of time down there going to Fan X, City Creek, and the Eccles. The plan to demolish part or all the Salt Palace would cause a disturbance with events like Fan X where we have so many people attend from out of state or even out of the country. I absolutely love Salt Lake City and wish for it to be revitalize, but not at the expense of the convention center. 6/13/2024 16:10 Curt GRESSETH Tell the mayor How about fixing the potholes along 500 East from South Temple to 400 South? Then we can talk about raises. 6/13/2024 16:12 Bernie Hart Best laid plans and the problems they encounter Wayne, Seems someone or some entity wants to build a grand coliseum in downtown SLC. Sort of like Rome strutting its stuff with total disregard for the masses. Honoring themselves and having an oversized idea of its own self-importance was the start of a whole series of problems for the empire. Having so many homeless folks in the middle of all this does not fit the image...so.. move them.... or jail them.... whatever is necessary ... but they have to go. I now have 70 survey's, on my way to 300. 60 are campers and everyone has been in a number of programs and is still struggling with a mental health or addiction problem. No exceptions. But move them where. Who would want this headache? This is the problem you all have to deal with before that grand idea works. Bernie Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/13/2024 16:13 Bernie Hart Please help me understand all this... I'm confused Wayne, Over 3,000 unhoused people in Utah. In Utah, and the plan is working. I may need more surveys to get your attention, the Mayors attention and the attention of the SLC City Council. I originally thought 300 would do the job, but that only represents 10% of the mentally ill and addicted in the "let us help you" system. They were all housed at one time. They all were in a number of treatment programs when they were in housing and still 3K "fell through the cracks" while in the system that you all are going to now reuse to "help them" deal with the same problems using the same solutions. Solutions and programs that didn't help them the first time, or third time around. Almost all have also been in jail or institutionalized while unhoused and each of those interactions with the system was an opportunity for you all to show the system you are going to use to now "help them" once they are "housed" is going to really work. But first you have to get them in housing. Good luck with that. But if you are lucky enough to get a few of them into housing and I understand all this, you all then expect the same system they were in a number of times to now "help them"... Hmmm! My head is starting to spin... I'm getting confused. Maybe someone could explain all this to me. Maybe it's old age and just a touch of dementia and I've forgotten how well the "system" really works. Could one of you stop by one morning and help a confused old man understand all this. Bernie 6/13/2024 16:15 Gil Podolsky Delta Center project I favor putting this project on hold for now. Leave the convention center and other existing facilities alone, except for routine maintenance. The new hockey team can share the Delta Center with the Jazz; or else use the E-Center or build their own place somewhere out of town. We don’t need another downtown sports venue or glitzy hotel. Salt Lake taxpayers don’t always need to subsidize private developer’s grand business schemes. The Council surely can come up with simpler, less costly and better targeted projects that address real needs. Gil Podolsky 6/13/2024 17:10 Anonymous Constituent Exploitative Behavior from a Council Member Council member Puy recently hired “models” from Nomad Alliance. These “models” were the reason Nomad Alliance got their funding pulled from the state. The “models” are homeless individuals that have been exploited. On top of that, he is paying them illegally in cash. They were used for a political advertisement. This is wrong and unethical on so many levels. This lack of judgement has no place in city council and he should be removed immediately. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/14/2024 9:14 Ira Hinckley Sad. Thanks a lot city council The Avenues community has worked together for four years asking Ivory Homes and the City to create a reasonable development at 675 N F Street. We have lost. The lot was zoned for nine homes but the multiple applications from Ivory Homes to the City have resulted in a Planned Development that will have 21 primary residences and 21 ADU’s for a total of 42 residences. This is a complete bastardizaiton of the concept of the ADU. ADU’s are intented to be added one at a time-here and there- by individual homeowners, not built in bulk by developers effectively, creating a sub-division of ADUs with far higher density than the surrounding community. There is very little to recommend this project; large two-story homes crammed together with no yards and grossly deficient parking, but we have run out of options. In retrospect we understand that we never stood a chance given the City’s relationship with Ivory Homes, their lack of interest in the opinions of residents and the City’s myopic focus on density and ADU’s Your support has not gone unnoticed. You helped us collect over 2100 signatures opposing the rezone. You helped fund our efforts. You wrote letters. You showed up for countless Planning Commission and City Council Meetings. You hosted yard signs. Your continued support has been overwhelming and we are so grateful to you for standing with us. During the past few months, we appealed the Planning Commission’s decision to approve the Planned Development based on the following six points: 1. The decision violates the Conditions of the Rezone from FR-3 to SR-1. 2. The lack of adequate parking or snow storage violates the compatible use requirement of City Code 21A.62.040. 3. The project does not qualify as a planned development and is not entitled to reduction of setbacks and expansion of building footprints. 4. The decision’s approval of high intensity development violates multiple provisions of city code. 5. The planning commission violated due process by approving a subdivision with built ADUs. 6. The Planning Commission decision is illegal as it overburdens an easement and violates City Code. 6/14/2024 9:20 Terry Marasco Hockey tax Issue with the hockey tax - I oppose it 1. I had a conversation with a council person, who said the burden on west side families, of lower incomes, is much less as we eat in fast food, not ritzy restaurants. a. There is no justification for any tax on low-income families under these circumstances 2. The tax will be spent internally, not going to the city but to pay for the stadium 3. The Ryan family is wealthy, and it becomes a moral question that those with much imposes on those with little. 4. It is unlikely that low-income families can afford the admission fee You can email these folks to express your concern. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/14/2024 9:23 Terry Marasco The NWQ Review group's proposal is unacceptable Dear Board Members: As a community leader on the west side who recognizes that the west side is the most polluted area in the state my opposition to the Group's recommendations are herein. Note that of almost 50 in the group, only 8 are from the west side, The group is a majority of Salt Lake Government officials and environmental groups. In no way has this group come to the west side and asked for input from a broad reach of citizens and businesses. For me, the proposal appears to be what the Salt Lake Government and environmental groups want rather than what is best for the west side. Any discussion of this tax allocation needs to be postponed until west sliders have a voice. Here are my suggestions: 1. RE: Great Salt Lake Shoreline Preserve land acquisition This is our priority request. Contribute match funding to land protection and restoration projects benefiting the wetlands and related areas of the GSL Shoreline. Salt Lake City received a GSLWET grant of $2 mil This request $3,000,000 The GSL has already received a large amount of attention from the city and the legislature (e.g., Salt Lake City received a GSLWET grant of $2 mil). $3M spent on pollution mitigation is more useful to the west side. While the GSL does have an effect on the west side, our needs are more immediate. For example, our neighborhoods are infected with drug dealers, illegal encampments, theft, and property damage. This money could be spent on safety issues as well as air pollution mitigation. https://www.clarity.io/blog/clean-air-cities-innovative-approaches-to-improving- air-quality-in-urban-settings 2, RE: On-Demand Transportation expansion Salt Lake City This Request $1,000,000 minimum could fund a one-year limited pilot This $1M would be better spent on pollution reduction and heat reduction on the west side. My opposition – this amount would be better spent on a tree project. The west side is already noted as lacking in trees (see Heat Island article), trees sequester carbon, remove pollutants, lower ambient temperatures. As climate change heats up the atmosphere tress are a viable solution to lower temperatures. https://www.kuer.org/health-science-environment/2023-10-17/want-to-know-where-salt-lake- citys-hot-spots-are-take-a-look-at-the-new-heat-map “New hyperlocal heat maps from a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-funded study show where the city’s hot spots are — generally anywhere with lots of asphalt and few trees. Temperatures tend to get hotter on the west side of town, with State Street serving as a loose dividing line.” Terry Marasco mentioned in: in https://dailyutahchronicle.com/2023/04/12/solving-poor-air- quality-on-the-west-side/https://dailyutahchronicle.com/2023/04/12/solving-poor-air-quality-on-the-west-side/ Trees remove air pollution: https://groundworkdenver.net/devs/Trees_airquality.pdf 3. No money should be spent on the landfill remediation Best, Terry Marasco Salt Lake City, Utah Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/14/2024 9:26 Craig Ogan Dispatch from the Front Please forward this message to your contacts who care about Abravanel Hall It may take the descriptive brevity of Hemingway or the articulate gravitas of Edward R. Murrow in London during the blitz to describe the action at the Salt Lake City Planning Commission, tonight, June 12, 2024. The Topic: Zoning Changes to Facilitate the Entertainment District proposal described by Salt Lake City Planning Department. A very professional and articulate discussion from the members of the public attending the meeting and then the Planning Commission members ensued: • First, some very well placed artillery shelling from several of the Utah Symphony Musicians about Abravanel Hall and how the Planning Commission's decisions on Zoning in the Entertainment District will effect Salt Lake City, the City's reputation, and cultural landscape • Second, a nuclear warhead was launched by Planning Commissioner, Bree Scheer. The Commissioner exploded the Zoning change proposals for the ED o Not being enough of a plan to consider o The changes are not consistent with what SLC has tried to do with development in downtown since the 1960s o The fallacy of chasing a "big thing" solution when there's no real problem that needs to be solved o The effect of the ED's height and digital footprint on neighborhoods surrounding the ED o Big projects don't age well (see ZCMI and Crossroads Mall, Main Street Beautification, even the Gateway and it's several reimaginations) • Other commissioners, from different prospective, found many other faults with the ED zoning proposal The result: the Planning Commission voted unanimously to "Save Abravanel Hall" and "not recommend" the proposed zoning changes which facilitate the ED to the City Council. The City Council and Salt Lake City mayor can ignore the Planning Commission. So continued interaction with the City Council Members is key Fantasy met reality, tonight at the Planning Commission, and reality carried the day. The meeting was recorded and will be available. Watch. Goodnight and good luck. 6/14/2024 14:25 Alex Churchward IHC Hospital on Former Sears Site Good Afternoon Alejandro, My name is Alex. I live in District 3 of Salt Lake City, but am writing to you as you were specifically quoted in the Salt Lake Tribune. I am dismayed by the Council's lack of support for the proposed hospital facility in downtown Salt Lake City. A world-class medical facility is a much-needed and desirable amenity. Expecting a hospital to somehow revitalize or engerize the downtown area is absurd. The City County building for example, in which you work, does little to add vibrancy to the city's core, but that's ok because that is not its purpose. How many of these mid-rise apartment buildings have street level retail that sits empty? Most of them. Please allow this project to move forward without requiring such ridiculous expectations. Thank you, Alex Churchward 6/18/2024 9:13 Marjorie McCloy Voicing Opposition to SEG Marjorie left a voicemail explaining her opposition to SEG and urging the Council to reject their proposal. Transcript: Hi, my name is Marjorie McCloy and I am a 9th and 9th resident, so Darin is my representative. I wanted to urge the Council to adhere to the planning commission's recommendation that the Smith Entertainment Group's proposal not allow any special treatment, that the height restriction not be allowed. I am quite, quite opposed to the Smith Entertainment Group owning a large section of downtown and the development being funded by Salt Lake City taxpayers only. I think this was an egregious misuse of power and I strongly recommend that the power systems listen to the people who are not politicians and whose job is to oversee the planning and Salt Lake and reject this height increase that the Smith Group is putting forth. Thank you very much. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/18/2024 9:25 Taylor Wilson Proactive Drought Management for Utah's Future Councilman Mano, My name is Taylor Wilson, and I am a resident of Salt Lake City, Utah. While we have been fortunate to experience two good snow pack years in a row, I remain deeply concerned about the ongoing threat of drought and its potential impact on our water supply, agriculture, and environment. As part of a comprehensive emergency management strategy, it is crucial to address the vulnerabilities in our water resources and infrastructure. I urge you to prioritize water conservation efforts, invest in modernizing our water infrastructure, and promote sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate the risks associated with future droughts. By taking these proactive measures, we can enhance our resilience and preparedness for drought conditions. Updating drought contingency plans, exploring water recycling technologies, and involving the public in water management planning are essential steps in ensuring our state’s long-term water security. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue and for your commitment to safeguarding Utah’s future. Sincerely, Taylor Wilson 6/18/2024 9:33 Bernie Hart Phone call to City Council Hi All, The survey we're doing shows that over 99% of the 75 campers we talked with are dealing with a mental health or addiction problem, and all had been in a program that claimed it could help them. Most had been in a number of programs..... and they are still lost. Maybe no one wants to talk about the effectiveness of the "we can help you" programs that claim they can help people who were lost because the survey sample size is too small. 75 is not a very big number. If that's the case, we'll just have to do a lot more surveys and along the way tell more stories about all the lost folks... who needed help... went for help ... and are still lost... Bernie 6/18/2024 12:35 Julie Allred Mr Smith This would affect every person in the state who are already reeling from the cost of living. I would say 90% or more never even come into the city. Why should we all have to pay for his dreams? Utah already taxes social security and is one of the highest taxed states. Please do not vote for this travesty for those of us who would never benefit!! 6/18/2024 12:44 Debra Day Olivier Tax increase .05% for Delta Center area development from District 6er Hello, Lived in Salt Lake City for more than 30 years and understand all to well the costs of increasing sales tax. As a retired teacher I would appreciate funding government from taxes and fees, NOT the sales tax. The SLC sales taxes are too high already, almost to California heights without the benefits. I was the caretaker for my ailing, poor sister in southern California, and the services for her were incredible-meals delivered to her home, full medical, in- home assistance(scheduled but not in effect she passed away), free rides to medical and dental offices, a service that would pick her and take her different places to walk(beaches, parks, etc) and more. This in a city that pays their police officers really well, has found housing for so many homeless that few are living unsheltered, beautiful parks and beaches, a pier for visiting and fishing, etc. I really object to raising sales tax to pay for this plan. What is the benefit of major league teams here? More tourists, more visitors, more strain on our utility, transportation, Police and fire departments. Seeing the new hotel at the Salt Lake Convention- what promises were made? As a Salt Laker please STOP this funding this plan from sales tax. Find another way. Perhaps the guys who had 53 million for a coal port in Oregon would be good guys to ask. Sincerely, Debra Day Olivier Salt Lake City, UT Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/18/2024 12:48 William Moran Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, William Moran 6/18/2024 16:26 Bernie Hart The surveys are showing that ..... Hi All, 102 homeless campers have now completed our informal survey. 99 have acknowledged that they are dealing with an addiction or mental health problem. And all 99 have been in treatment programs. The three who are dealing with neither problem, live in camps run by people struggling with mental health and addiction issues. All have had regular contact with SLCPD. SLCPD knows who they are, where they are ... and nothing changes. Is it possible that collectively they have been in so many "let us help you" programs without being "helped", that they are not service "resistant", but their shared knowledge of failure becomes a block and makes further engagement with services unappealing? If programs are failing and SLCPD is not impacting the situation. What do we do? Bernie 6/19/2024 16:44 Oswaldo Ponce de Leon Landa (EXTERNAL) Urgent Concerns Regarding Police Response to Student Protests at The University of Utah Dear Council Member Eva López Chávez, I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Oswaldo, and I am a concerned resident of District 4 in Salt Lake City. I am writing to express my deep disappointment and anger regarding the recent violent police response to peaceful student protests at The University of Utah. As a community organizer and liaison, I know you have a track record of showing up to help residents and businesses. However, your lack of response to this critical issue has left many of us feeling unheard and unsupported. Sharing a post from the ACLU on your social media is not enough. The events that unfolded during the protests were deeply troubling, and it is essential that we address them promptly and effectively. Here are some specific concerns I would like to bring to your attention: 1. Excessive Use of Force: Reports indicate that law enforcement officers used excessive force against peaceful student protesters. Tear gas, rubber bullets, and physical aggression were employed, resulting in injuries and trauma. As our representative, I urge you to investigate these incidents thoroughly and advocate for accountability. 2. Transparency and Accountability: We need transparency regarding the decision-making process that led to the police response. Were there alternative strategies considered? What protocols were followed? As our elected official, you have a responsibility to ensure accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies. 3. Community Healing: The aftermath of these events has left our community divided and hurting. We need leadership that fosters healing, dialogue, and understanding. Please consider organizing community forums, listening sessions, or town halls to address residents' concerns and work toward reconciliation. Council Member López Chávez, I believe in your commitment to social justice and community well-being. However, your silence on this matter has left me deeply disappointed. I urge you to take immediate action regarding the use of city resources during this unnecessarily violent incident. Sincerely, Oswaldo Ponce de León Landa Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/20/2024 8:46 Taylor Wilson Proactive Drought Management for Utah's Future Councilman Wharton, My name is Taylor Wilson, and I am a resident of Salt Lake City, Utah. While we have been fortunate to experience two good snow pack years in a row, I remain deeply concerned about the ongoing threat of drought and its potential impact on our water supply, agriculture, and environment. As part of a comprehensive emergency management strategy, it is crucial to address the vulnerabilities in our water resources and infrastructure. I urge you to prioritize water conservation efforts, invest in modernizing our water infrastructure, and promote sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate the risks associated with future droughts. By taking these proactive measures, we can enhance our resilience and preparedness for drought conditions. Updating drought contingency plans, exploring water recycling technologies, and involving the public in water management planning are essential steps in ensuring our state’s long-term water security. Thank you for your attention to this critical issue and for your commitment to safeguarding Utah’s future. Sincerely, Taylor Wilson 6/20/2024 9:08 Mercedes Smith one quick question about the tax and vote Hi Chris, Thank you for meeting with some of my colleagues the other day. I'm hoping you can help me answer just one 'easy' question. If the city council votes for the tax on July 2, can you still make amendments to the participation agreement between then and Sept 1? Or is the day of the vote also the last day to get an amendment made? Thank you. Onward, Mercedes Smith Principal Flute, Utah Symphony Founder, Black Strad Concert Attire 6/20/2024 9:30 Scott Rosenbush Smith Redevelopment proposal question Dear Councilman Wharton, At the Avenues Community Council meeting last week you mentioned that the City has until September to reach an agreement regarding the Smith Group's redevelopment proposal. Would you please confirm who is leading the negotiations on behalf of the City? Is it the Mayor's Office? The RDA? And who specifically is doing the negotiating? Thank you for all of your efforts on behalf of the City. Scott Rosenbush Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/20/2024 16:24 Stephanie Irvin NHL Impact Break Sports Grill Hello, My name is Stephanie Irvin, owner of The Break Sports Grill Restaurant franchise located at 140 w 300. We are a crosswalk away from the Delta Center, and the only Sports Grill within one block. My brother Bam Peck opened the first Break 10 years ago in South Jordan. He started as a bartender and opened his first Break with the support of friends and family investors. His brand is loved by many locals and non-locals due to the fun sports atmosphere, great service and amazing food. Our downtown location is the fourth Break to open and we cater to local and out of towners who want to eat local food and drinks. We opened in December of 2022, and have been extremely successful due to our proximity to the Delta Center and Salt Palace. We've hosted fans for the NBA Allstars, NCAA tournament, Jazz Games, concerts and much more. We have 30 employees who rely on the income from the events at the Delta Center. We are extremely excited about NHL coming to Salt Lake and the Delta Center. We love hosting fans and are excited to continue to serve locals and travelers who come to Salt Lake to watch their favorite sport and concert events. While we are excited about NHL, I am concerned about the future of our location if we are not incorporated in the plan to host and entertain local and non-local sports fans. A few of my concerns: Our business will lose revenue during construction if 300 S or 140 W are closed. If this is The new Entertainment F/B area south of the Delta center will choke our business off from the promenade and there will be no doors that open to our business front as they do today. What plans are there to support local businesses as part of the promenade, how will the Break be incorporated into the overall plan? Funds provided by taxpayers should be used to incorporate the Break into the overall plan and update the look of the Hyatt so that we fit into the overall plan. We want our local sports grill to be part of the plan and we would like to be given and exception to become a full bar as others in the surrounding area will be granted. My business partner and I have invested about $600k into the Break and we do not want to lose out on our investment while others will be benefitting from new opportunities. I will be contacting Salt Lake City as well, and appreciate a response to my inquiry, 6/21/2024 12:43 Perrine Anderson Abravanel Hall Perene Anderson, a constituent up by 15th and 15th. I want you to vote against tearing down Abravanel Hall. 6/21/2024 12:48 Maura Powers Abravanel Hall Maura Powers, Roosevelt Ave. Against Downtown hockey district getting rid of Abravanel Hall Call back 6/24/2024 12:37 Matthew Peters Request to Address Scooter Parking on Private Property Dear Salt Lake City Transportation Division, I am writing to express my ongoing frustration with Lime scooters being repeatedly parked on my private property at REDACTED, in the Avenues. Despite numerous attempts to resolve this issue directly with Lime through many emails, there has been no effective resolution. I have specifically requested that Lime create a no-parking zone on my grass, but this has not been implemented. As a homeowner paying a significant amount in property taxes, I find it unfair that I have to deal with the burden of these scooters on my property while receiving no share of the profits. It is unreasonable for me to continuously move these scooters to maintain my lawn, such as mowing. Lime benefits from their presence on my land without my consent or any compensation. I urge the city to implement stricter regulations and designated no-parking zones to prevent scooters from being left on private properties. I request that this is escalated to the Cities contact at Lime to ensure it is addressed promptly and effectively. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to a prompt and effective resolution. Sincerely, Matthew Peters Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/24/2024 16:37 Thea Brannon SEG's Downtown "Revitalization" Project I am writing as a citizen of Salt Lake City for 24 years, active with the Sugarhouse Community Council Zoning Subcommittee. I am deeply concerned about the inappropriateness of Ryan Smith demanding reimbursement (essentially) from the residents of SLC for his own personal ambitions. If he has enough money to add a hockey team to his collection,he can darn well pay for all his plans himself! The idea that we should be taxed primarily for his benefit is incomprehensible to me. The initial project itself is a cool idea, especially ditching the monstrous back end of the Convention Center and celebrating what's left of Japantown. However, I reject his blandishments about the value of increased property values--they're already TOO HIGH, accelerating homelessness and people struggling to pay rent! Likewise, his suggestion that his project will attract more outside private investment, I find chilling. That is the LAST thing we need! The only parties who would benefit from this are the real estate/developer bullies who populate most of the legislature, and who have allied with Smith to force this on SLC by Sept 1. Outside investment companies would be completely attuned only to their bottom line, not the health, happiness, and best interests of our community. I read that SEG wants a 99-year lease at current rate, with no leeway for inflation. NOT ACCEPTABLE. Also, a full 100-acre project area? NO. Probably the worst is the possibility of tax increment financing--a proven scam benefiting developers primarily, and a "Public Infrastructure District"-- whatever that means. Sounds suspiciously like a Utah Inland Port Authority boondoggle... If any more TIF has to be done, it should be done for the Rio Grande Project, which would be more beneficial to the larger community by perhaps even providing truly affordable housing on the newly available land, and by restoring a grand old train station to its proper use (as was done very successfully with a much less imposing station in Denver). And lastly, why on earth should Ryan Smith be deciding the fate of our Abravanel Hall? Who is he to have such power? I realize that you as a City Council are outgunned, but I beg you to be REALLY TOUGH in negotiations over this project and throw whatever weight you can back at the legislative and corporate powers that be. I greatly appreciate all the members of the Council struggling with this dilemma, and thank you for considering my comments. I really did try to restrain myself! 6/24/2024 16:40 Bernie Hart Surveys can tell a story Hi All, We have now collected almost 200 surveys. By the end of next week we will have reached out to every area in the city that has become the home of the campers in our city. The surveys are telling an interesting story. The campers story. And the story does not reflect the narrative created by most service providers. We'll also be gathering surveys from campers in Ogden and organizing a separate survey for people staying in the shelters. If anyone would like to join us, we'd really like the participation. It would be an opportunity for each of you to hear the experiences of people the "let us help you" system has failed to help. Bernie 6/25/2024 10:53 Brian M Arthur Please do not allow this unacceptable pay raise for SLC Mayor position Hi Chris, This raise asked by the current mayor is absurd. In business and corporations, a double digit pay raise in 10 to 15% range is considered extremely high. Also consider this article from Axios https://www.axios.com/local/salt-lake-city/2024/05/23/mayor-erin-mendenhall-salary-comparison Thr mayor , while I do like her, needs to SHOW us all she's the one who can lead this into our significant transitions needed for NHL, maybe and hopefully MLB and certainly the Olympics. Otherwise SLC and it's dilapidated streets and parks will continue to be a laughing stick of the West. I would agree to a 13 , half requested, increase if you truly believe it's merited. Then she shows us she deserves more thru the next few years. Thanks Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/25/2024 10:55 Graham Stork Taxes, Fees and Ryan Smith Mr. Wharton, I just finished reading The Salt Lake Tribune article on tax and fee increases for fiscal year 2024/2025. The increase is a significant chunk of change, but I understand that sometimes taxes and fees must go up. Infrastructure maintenance is required, expensive and cannot be deferred forever. BUT...What Ryan Smith is proposing is not required for my well being in Salt Lake City and I am completely opposed to my tax dollars being used to facilitate Ryan Smith's dream. I don't care what Ryan Smith does with the Salt Palace, Abravanel Hall, the Delta Center or any other part of downtown Salt Lake City...AS LONG AS HE DOES IT WITH HIS OWN MONEY. I do not support using Salt Lake City or State tax dollars to fund Ryan Smith's dreams. Graham Stork 204 M St Salt Lake City, UT 6/25/2024 14:34 Sheri P Bernard Understand your constituency Many of us are on fixed incomes and continue to watch EVERYTHING go up in cost, from property taxes to groceries, to gasoline. It is tone deaf for the older residents, as well as the ones who are living paycheck-to- paycheck, to subsidize a sports center like this. We don't want it; we don't need it. If sports are big business, let them fund 100% of the cost, to show 100% support of the community. If ticket sales will not fund the center, then the whole concept isn't financially feasible. Don't be seduced by the marketers and lobbyists ... the majority of SLC folk aren't supportive of this endeavor -- or wouldn't be if they understood what it will cost them, personally. 6/25/2024 16:18 Michael Jones District 6 Mailer, Traffic Calming . Dear Council Member Dugan et al, I received your mailer about traffic calming over a month ago and I am responding to your call for feedback with regard to safe streets and neighborhoods. I live in the area of REDACTED, which sees a lot of traffic of many different transportation modes. The intersection is on the UTA Bus Route 9, is designated as a bike route, and conducts neighborhood and thru traffic for automobiles. College, high school, and elementary school students walk along these streets, and many other people getting out to walk dogs, go for a run, or spend time outside. In the five years I have lived in the neighborhood, I have watched private drivers run the stop signs while driving east-west on 900 South (Orange Arrows). I have watched the 9 bus get stuck making a right turn from 1600 E to 900 S, because the turn is too tight. The bus must swing out into eastbound traffic on 900 S (Red Line), which is impossible if there is a car present (Blue Rectangle). Last year a UTA bus damaged a car that was parked on the curb (Pink Rectangle) when it took the turn too tight. I have watched traffic jam while drivers don't heed 4-way stop rules during high volume times around the UofU commuter traffic. I have seen pedestrians hustled across the crosswalk by impatient drivers. I am a practicing civil engineer in the Salt Lake metro area, and I have been thinking on this intersection for a couple of years. Below is my proposed solution. Begin by adding bulbout/curb extension on the north sides of the intersection (Purple Polygons). The effects are Increase radius for bus turn Decrease pedestrian crossing distance Increase pedestrian visibility Horizontal deflection for East/West traffic (details below) Add pedestrian refuge islands, south of where the current 900 S centerline exists (Purple Rectangles, Yellow lines for restriping centerline). The effects are In conjunction with point 4 above, adds horizontal deflection to slow traffic Create space for bus turns Pedestrian visibility, priority in language of built environment (could be coupled with raised crosswalks) For this to work, remove street parking for lane space on the south side of the intersection (Red Lines). Since this is residential with homes with driveways, impacts to parking are negligible. One concern with this design is bicycle use. Experienced cyclists are used to taking a car lane to perform a left turn, but inexperienced users should be considered in this design. Thank you for reaching out and for this opportunity to share my thoughts about the neighborhood. Respectfully, Michael Jones Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/25/2024 16:22 Thea Brannon EG's Downtown "Revitalization" Project I am writing as a citizen of Salt Lake City for 24 years, active with the Sugarhouse Community Council Zoning Subcommittee. I am deeply concerned about the inappropriateness of Ryan Smith demanding reimbursement (essentially) from the residents of SLC for his own personal ambitions. If he has enough money to add a hockey team to his collection,he can darn well pay for all his plans himself! The idea that we should be taxed primarily for his benefit is incomprehensible to me. The initial project itself is a cool idea, especially ditching the monstrous back end of the Convention Center and celebrating what's left of Japantown. However, I reject his blandishments about the value of increased property values--they're already TOO HIGH, accelerating homelessness and people struggling to pay rent! Likewise, his suggestion that his project will attract more outside private investment, I find chilling. That is the LAST thing we need! The only parties who would benefit from this are the real estate/developer bullies who populate most of the legislature, and who have allied with Smith to force this on SLC by Sept 1. Outside investment companies would be completely attuned only to their bottom line, not the health, happiness, and best interests of our community. I read that SEG wants a 99-year lease at current rate, with no leeway for inflation. NOT ACCEPTABLE. Also, a full 100-acre project area? NO. Probably the worst is the possibility of tax increment financing--a proven scam benefiting developers primarily, and a "Public Infrastructure District"-- whatever that means. Sounds suspiciously like a Utah Inland Port Authority boondoggle... If any more TIF has to be done, it should be done for the Rio Grande Project, which would be more beneficial to the larger community by perhaps even providing truly affordable housing on the newly available land, and by restoring a grand old train station to its proper use (as was done very successfully with a much less imposing station in Denver). And lastly, why on earth should Ryan Smith be deciding the fate of our Abravanel Hall? Who is he to have such power? I realize that you as a City Council are outgunned, but I beg you to be REALLY TOUGH in negotiations over this project and throw whatever weight you can back at the legislative and corporate powers that be. I greatly appreciate all the members of the Council struggling with this dilemma, and thank you for considering my comments. I really did try to restrain myself! Sincerely, Thea Brannon 6/25/2024 16:23 Byron Yensen Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Byron Yensen Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/25/2024 16:35 Bernie Hart Unbelievable Andrew, A sample of what the surveys are showing: Martin went into a program for the first time when he was 17. He is now 49 and sleeping in Liberty Park. Angel was 16 when he went into a program, he is now 41 and sleeping on the street. Celestino was 12, is now 60 and sleeping on the street. Usa was 18, is not 38 and sleeps around the library. Terry was 17, is now 35 and sleeps around the library. Brittany was 8, yes 8, is now 30 and sleeps around Taufer Park. No Name was 18, is now 32 and sleeps on the street in Sugarhouse. Bernadine was 7, yes 7, is now 43 and sleeps in Fairmont Park. Jacob was 18, is now 43 and sleeps on the street in Sugarhouse. Cassidy was 7, is now 47 and sleeps on the street in Sugarhouse. Kat was 13, is now 27 and also sleeps on the street in Sugarhouse. No Name was 17, is now 38 and sleeps on the street in Sugarhouse No Name was 9, is now 56 and sleeps around the Mission. Braden was 6, yes 6, is now 34 and sleeps arounds 2nd and 2nd. Dirk was 7, is now 44 and was sleeping in Washington Park. James was 16, is now 68 and was sleeping in Washing Park. Linda was 20, is now 36 and was sleeping in Washing Park. No Name was 6, is now 45 and was hanging in Washington Park. Timothy was 7, is now 37 and was hanging in Washington Park. Angelo was 19, is now 50 and was sleeping in Washington Park. Richard was 16, is now 33 and sleeping around 2nd & 2nd. Lonnie was 13, is now 49 and sleeping in Fairmont Park. This information comes from just one quarter of the surveys. They are all sleeping on the streets of Salt Lake City and all have been in some kind of "we can help you" program. And according to local service providers, none, even those who have been in a number of programs are ready to be helped. Unbelievable Bernie 6/25/2024 16:51 Diane B Whittaker Sales Tax Increase DO NOT increase the city-wide sales tax to pay for the new sports entertainment district. All counties should have the sales tax increase, not just SLC residents. This is detrimental for retail businesses and residents. This would put our sales tax a full 1% higher than the rest of the county. 6/25/2024 20:01 Paul Zuckerman Taxes for Developers Hello, In short, I do not wish my taxes to be invested in a developer's repurposing of our downtown. Nor do I wish to have my taxes raised for this purpose beyond proposed increases for public services. If this project is to be undertaken, and if it is financially worthy of being pursued, the developers and businesses that will profit from it should be paying for it. Private developers can renege on promises and walk away anytime making public partnerships a questionable proposition. Ask the folks in Phoenix. And finally, the council should continue to be very discriminating regarding requests for rezoning as was done when the request for elimination of the height restriction was denied. Thank you, Paul Zuckerman Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/26/2024 9:28 Arlin Cooper Rio Grande Plan Dear Councilman Puy, I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the current iterations of the Rio Grande District Project and to respectfully request that you do not support any version of the plan that does not include a provision to bury the train tracks. The presence of surface-level train tracks in Salt Lake City poses significant challenges that critically impact the cohesion, safety, and growth of our community. These tracks act as a formidable barrier, disrupting the connectivity between neighborhoods and limiting the potential for seamless urban development. The current state of the train tracks leads to several pressing issues: 1. **Safety Concerns**: Surface-level tracks increase the risk of accidents for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Burying the tracks would significantly enhance safety, preventing tragic incidents and promoting a more secure environment for all residents. 2. **Noise Pollution**: The noise generated by passing trains is a persistent disturbance that affects the quality of life for nearby residents and businesses. Subterranean tracks would mitigate this issue, contributing to a quieter, more livable urban space. 3. **Traffic Congestion**: Train crossings cause frequent interruptions in traffic flow, leading to congestion and delays. Burying the tracks would ensure uninterrupted vehicular movement, improving overall transportation efficiency in the city. 4. **Urban Development and Connectivity**: Surface-level tracks fragment the urban landscape, hindering the development of cohesive neighborhoods and public spaces. By burying the tracks, we can reclaim valuable land for parks, commercial areas, and residential developments, fostering a more integrated and vibrant community. 5. **Economic Growth**: Enhanced connectivity and improved urban aesthetics resulting from buried tracks would attract new businesses and investors, driving economic growth and increasing property values. I understand that incorporating such a significant infrastructure project into the Rio Grande District plan involves considerable investment and complex planning. However, the long-term benefits of burying the train tracks far outweigh the initial costs. This initiative would transform Salt Lake City into a more connected, safer, and prosperous urban center. I urge you to advocate for a version of the Rio Grande District Project that includes a comprehensive strategy to bury the train tracks. Your support in this matter is crucial for the future development and well-being of our city, especially for West side residents. Thank you for your attention to this important issue. I look forward to your positive response and am hopeful that, together, we can drive meaningful change for Salt Lake City. Sincerely, Arlin Cooper 6/27/2024 9:03 Daryl Ashley Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Daryl Ashley daryl Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/27/2024 9:08 Chanda Ashley Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium From: Chanda Ashley <AFP@sp.actcentr.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 9:52 AM To: Petro, Victoria <victoria.petro@slcgov.com> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Chanda Ashley St George 6/27/2024 9:13 Kay Martin Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Kay Martin 6/27/2024 11:17 Barbara Gandy Thank you for Council support of the arts in Utah Dear Members of the City Council - This email is to offer sincere thanks for your support of the Arts in Utah. Our theatre company, Pygmalion Productions dba Pygmalion Theatre Co. (a Resident of The Rose Wagner Performing Arts Center), has been the benefactor of grant money from Salt Lake Arts Council as well as Utah Arts and Museums and ZAP. Be assured that the grants directly support our shows, and without it, we would likely be unable to survive. There is such a bounty of cultural and arts events in Utah, and we are proud to be part of this vibrant community. I hope you are proud too, and will continue to support not only Pygmalion, but the broader arts community through continued funding. Sincerely yours, Barbara Gandy Member of the Board of Trustees Pygmalion Theatre Company - Giving Voice to Women Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 9:05 Tim Funk City sports, entertainment zone proposal . Dear Victoria and Darin, We hope the finds you both safe and well, Salt Lake City should pause and take a much longer look at the Smith Sports and Entertainment Group proposal now before you. This is probably the single most costly decision the city has ever had before it. When a proposal adds up to billions of dollars and stretches out over three decades or more it calls for deep inspection of all it demands of you as Council members. And, of all of us city residents faced with higher taxes. There is so much that can be said. However, we want to make two main points. First, we agree entirely with the City Planning Commission unanimous vote against the SEG proposal. We think the proposal asks too much too soon and that the City Council, and the Mayor in turn, should take a longer, more detailed look at what it offers and what it costs. Planning Commissioner Bree Sheer pointed out the history of previous city "big deals” that have fallen far short of what was anticipated. We don’t need another Crossroads Mall, or Gateway or stumbling City Creek Mall. We are strong enough and smart enough to go slower and get even smarter. Second, there are many struggling city residents, including my household and extended family, who are older and on reduced incomes who don’t want and really dcan’t afford higher taxes in the city prior. Given the the tax increase the City Council is now considering and the proposed increase in local sales tax we charging towards a $500 increase. Really we love living here but the cost of living is killing us bit by bit. As a lower, middle income renter and/or homeowner I have been paying local property and sale taxes in Salt Lake City for over sixty years. I can honestly say the sports, entertainment and convention glories predicted by this big deal only mean a harder time for me and other older residents. It is reported that more than half of senior households locally and and across the country rely on Social Security as their main source of income. Contribute as we have, and still do, to the body politic we cannot afford the SEG pie in the Utah sky. Take your time and do it right. If you have any questions please give me call. Take care. Tim Funk Crossroads Urban Center Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 9:44 Sean Farrell 300 West Policing Hello Marie, Chris and Alicia, I am a Capitol Hill Neighborhood resident and attended the Neighborhood Council meeting yesterday evening. First of all, thank you for your time and participation in these meetings. I had not attended one before last night and found it informative and helpful. Nevertheless, I want to follow up on the discussion around police patrols and enforcement on 300 West. While it was encouraging to learn there are new overtime patrols on 300 West between North Temple and 300 North, it was equally discouraging to learn these patrols will not extend farther north along 300 West. As a resident of this neighborhood who lives on 300 West and also runs along 300 West four or five times a week, I can assert the majority of the traffic issues, particularly the worst of the issues, take place between 600 North and North Gateway Park. I went from feeling discouraged to exasperated when I learned these patrols are only happening because a group of private citizens are funding them. I am deeply concerned that the only way to get the SLCPD to address the myriad traffic issues affecting this part of the city is to supply additional funds beyond the taxes we already pay as residents. My wife and I moved to this neighborhood in 2018. Over the last six years, we have noticed a near complete lack of a police presence in this neighborhood despite having brought these traffic and other concerns to city officials. We have been told repeatedly that one reason for this is the police are busy addressing other crimes. In talking with neighbors, including another couple at the meeting yesterday, they have been told the same. However, SLC-wide crime rates have been dropping sharply since 2021 per SLCPD statistics and, as we heard yesterday, crime rates continue to drop in the Capitol Hill neighborhood. Based on the city-wide and neighborhood trends, and the fact there are patrol divisions within the SLCPD, I am genuinely curious why there cannot be a regular patrol that includes the north end of 300 West? I believe a consistent presence, even if not frequent, would curtail many of the traffic issues we experience. I appreciate your consideration in this matter. Thank you again for all you do. Sincerely, Sean Farrell 6/28/2024 13:12 Rhonda Jonhnson Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Rhonda Johnson Kearns 6/28/2024 13:21 Paul Hamric Emigration Hello Dan Paul Hamric here from Canyon Crest Condo. I would love to see the rezone request get denied by the council vote. Thank you for all your day after day work that makes our district the best in our city. We at Canyon Crest appreciate all that you and your staff do for us. Thanks again Dan 6/28/2024 13:24 Stephanie Stewart Emigration Rezoning denied by Planning Commission Hello Councilman Dugan, I am an owner at the Canyon Crest Condominiums, REDACTED, and have recently learned that The Planning Commission denied the request to rezone the Emigration project. I would like to ask for your support to please accept the Commission's recommendation and deny the zoning request when the City Council meets. Thank you in advance and for your service. Very respectfully, Stephanie Stewart Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 13:34 Richard Layman Roundabout at Kensington Ave. and Ken Rey Street My next door neighbor told me there is some opposition to this. I live next to it and supportive. I do have a transportation planning background in sustainable mobility. I do think implementation was mishandled and I wrote a blog entry about it. RL 6/28/2024 13:46 Diane Epperson Emmigration Canyon rezoning The planning commission denied the rezoning for Emmigration Canuon re-zoning. When the city council meets, I would like you to support the planning commissions decision not to rezone Emmigration Canyon. Thank you, Diane Epperson resident of Canyon Crest Condo. 6/28/2024 13:47 Martha Wunderli Emigration project Dear Councilman Dugan, I am very happy that the Planning Commission rejected the request for the Enigration property rezoning. It is a poorly thought out project. They suggested a second roundabout in front of the property at a point where there is a bend in the road. That, the environmental impact on the area, flooding issues and the 30 degree slant on the land by Bench Towers, etc, etc, make this is a dangerous proposition. My husband, Sara and I attended last evening's meeting. If you were able to watch, you would have noted the number of people who attended to object. Please vote against rezoning when this comes before the Council. Thank you for your service. Martha Wunderli President 6/28/2024 14:31 Marcia Richards Emmigration Canyon rezoning I am writing to encourage you to accept the denial of rezoning near where I live. I have owned a place in Canyon Crest condos for 30 years and have watched the traffic get worse in Emmigration Canyon as it has been developed. A high density project would make this intolerable besides being inappropriate for the area. Thank you for your representation. Marcia Richards 6/28/2024 14:35 Dianna CANNON Fwd: About the rezoning Emigration Project As a constituent and person who lives near Emigration canyon, I am respectfully requesting that you honor the decision of the Commission and deny the request to rezone for the Emigration Project. So many of us are opposed to this and think it is a terrible idea to build so much additional infrastructure near our drinking water and in an area that should remain as it is. Many of us enjoy the trails, the shade, the wildlife and the beauty of the canyon. I strongly oppose more building in the area and hope that you do too. On top of that, it was originally decided that it was unsafe to build there for many reasons and rezoning it doesn’t make it any safer. It is also just a terrible idea to destroy the beauty of the area for more buildings. Housing can go in somewhere else. The area cannot take any more congestion. Please vote against the rezoning. Thank you, Dianna Cannon 6/28/2024 14:40 Julio Facelli Planning Commission denied the request to rezone the Emigration Project Dear Dan, I am writing to request your support of the planning commission recommendation on the rezoning request of the property at the east end of Salt Lake City on Emigration Canyon. All the community is against this rezoning request that is driven by landowners in search of making a quick profit without any appreciable benefit for the community. I urge you to vote in support of the commission recommendation and have the city consider the purchase of the property for the open space reservation program. It will be ideal for the city to purchase this property and connect it with the "dog park" making a true open space gateway from Emigration Canyon. Sincerely, Julio Facelli Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 14:57 Emily Chipman 1/2 Kensington "street calming" Hello, Jon and Julianne and cCouncilman Dugan, I am writing to express my concern about a recent "street calming" addition just east of 1900 East on Kensington Ave. I recently spoke with the transportation project manager Will, and he shared some insights about the project. However, I have now spoken to multiple neighbors and feel it's important to share some additional concerns. This installation has now CREATED multiple safety and traffic issues, which I am sharing below: Potential accidents and traffic issues are already occurring and multiple times a day. I and multiple neighbors have witnessed multiple drivers confused by the installation. Some are confused that it may be a traffic circle, and are driving into oncoming traffic. Due to the odd triangle shape and large size, it is unclear that the road is still a two way street. Yesterday, within a period of 15 minutes, I saw multiple cars driving on the wrong side of the road to treat it as a traffic circle rather than a 2 way road. I learned in speaking with Will that he thought it was funny seeing how people reacted after it was installed, and clearly people didn't know how to react. That's not good, and indicates we're not the only ones to see this. Child endangerment: Children have now started using this as a place to hang out and play. We've seen small children (hardly seeable aa they are bent over) drawing in chalk to play four square, and others hanging out on their bikes. In addition to playing in a place where cars are driving the wrong way, it also has not been properly installed which presents further risk. (See bullet below.) (I even took a photo last night of two 12 year old boys hanging out in the middle. There is also still chalk left in the middle of the street from children playing four square in it.) As a reminder, in 2022 a little girl was hit and killed in this area (21 east and 13th south) by a truck. This should be taken seriously and we take child safety seriously in our neighborhood. This is NOT safe. Improperly installed: This was not studied with a traffic study and has been used by a single neighbor who has a pet peeve. The city website indicates that studies will be done before changes are made to streets. This was not done. The person who installed it was not even aware that there is frequent street parking by neighbors when he arrived to install it. These cars include wide trucks. Given he had no awareness and the neighbors had to inform him of immediately calls design into question. The city website indicates you'll connect with the community before making changes. Our street was not notified about the installation as a street. The design was not controlled or created by the city. On the day of installation, two neighbors got involved. The first was the driving force and the person who mase the request. According to the other neighbor who was there, the neighbor made it larger than it originally started out. A second neighbor somehow learned about this and stayed home that day to make sure that it wasn't installed in a way that blocked her driveway. She had to leave early. The installation does partially block her driveway and disregarded her home. No neighbor should be involved in the installation or haphazard design of our street traffic. It is not even correctly installed: During my conversation with Will from your department, I learned that it doesn't even have the correct number of posts. (I'm sure because it was intended to be smaller.) Also, the fact that the city used a Prius to install the sticky pads for the poles causes me to question whether this is even legitimately put together and thought through. difficult to see and use. As noted, this has been a very confusing installation. When driving west on Kensington, it actually makes the street look cut off. One neighbor took to placing hot pink flamingos inside of it that does help. But if they weren't there, I wouldn't have noticed them the first day. I don't dare remove them because they've actually helped. creating neighborhood problems: Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 14:57 Emily Chipman 2/2 CONTINUED!! Kensington "street calming" The neighbor who stayed to make sure that their driveway wasn't blocked have now had people coming to their home to complain. Someone loterally came, parked in their parking lot, and approaches them to express their displeasure. But thise neighbors were not the ones who made the initial request, and now they have people upset with them. This has now created a streetwide community issue. The only person fully happy? The one person who has made the request. Unclear communication: when I spoke with Will, he would not give me a clear answer how long this would be in place other than "through at least end of summer:. Multiple concerns here: this is when kids are out playing the most, and creates greater risk. Our street should have been informed of changes to traffic and we should know what the situation is. Where was this communication rather than a sole person getting to make decisions for the complete neighborhood? I and my neighbors support safe driving and safe children. We understand if you want to study traffic patterns. However, this is not safe, nor is it appropriate for neighbors to choose the design at will. I request the following: Please immediately remove the dangerous installation. Will has indicated that it will "stay up through summer." However, I and multiple other neighbors are concerned that it puts children at even more risk when they are outside playing during this time. I ask that it be removed immediately. If something needs to be there, it needs to be safe and a STUDIED out and thoughtful design from a traffic engineer - not a neighbor! It was safer without this. We should lean towards safety and proper traffic design. Please complete a traffic study and reach out to our neighborhood before making future changes. We are impacted by the upcoming Kensington bikeway. Your department's actions suggest we will not be heard or considered, and brings into question the relationship we will have in coming years. It also calls into question how openly you will communicate with us and whether we will be notified of things that impact us. It is important that you honor what the city has committed to about making street and traffic changes, especially as this builds the relationship we'll be in as you make changes in coming years. Should you find traffic calming is needed, I'm sure we can understand that IF it has been properly designed with studies and ensures safe driving and children. We see many other options that were not considered, including: setting up a speed alert so that people are aware of their speeds putting up road signs to notify people that children are at play. Having proper street design and signs. It's important that we work together and build a positive relationship with the pending Kensington bike pathways, and this is an important step in building a positive relationship. Taking appropriate steps to care for this neighborhood is an important step in doing so. Thank you for allowing me to express my concerns. Councilman Dugan, I am happy to visit with you more if you have additional questions. I can also point you towards other neighbors who have concerns. We need your support because Will reported that this was installed as the city does not have money. This haphazard approach has now wasted time and created problems. I'm sure I and other neighbors would welcome your help woth this. Emily Chipman 6/28/2024 16:53 Bernie Hart Let's start counting Andrew, It seems the focus is going to be centered on how long people are homeless and how many "we can help you" programs they have been in. And I personally may start counting the number of excuses I hear about why the "we can help you" programs could not help someone. Yesterday I was talking with a SLCPD spokesperson about the number of homeless on our streets. They said it was a major problem and the solution was getting more of the people living on our streets into "we can help you programs". They have already been in at least 10 such programs and are still on the street. So, is putting someone back into programs that failed to help them a number of times really the best and only long term solution? The list of names: Ann entered the "we can help you" system when she was 7, she has been in 12 different programs, is now 39, addicted and sleeping behind a building on 600W. David entered the ..... Bernie 6/28/2024 16:54 Bernie Hart ... and a few more names Andrew, A few more names. These represent people who were older than 20 when they first reached out for help. Each has been in more than an average of 10 mental health or addiction programs and sleeps on the street in Salt Lake City. Anna, age 50, she sleeps in the area around 200S 300E Dave, age 60, is an addict and he sleeps around the Mission on 400E London is 42, been in a number of programs and sleeps in the Rio Grande area Now I'm starting to wonder what programs they were in ... and if the programs they were in really help more than a very few people. There are a lot of names, Bernie Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 16:56 Granary District Granary District Alliance - Letter of Support - Historic 5th Ward Dear Mayor Mendenhall and Salt Lake City Council members, The Granary District Alliance is writing you this letter as a consortium of business owners and local developers who are heavily invested in the well-being of the Granary District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake City as a whole. We appreciate the City’s immediate attention to the unlawful demolition of the former 5th Ward on 300 West by the developer TAG SLC and the listed property owner, and partner in TAG SLC, Jordan Atkin. This illegal act, was deliberate circumvention of safeguards, and it gives other responsible developers a bad name, and selfishly and unilaterally removed a piece of the history and soul of our community that our board and many members of the Granary community work very diligently to preserve, restore and revive. Any claim that the building has no economic value is false. On May 20th, not two weeks before the unlawful demolition, the GDA hosted a group highly interested in purchasing, renovating and creating a unique LGTBQ+ friendly meeting place at the historic 5th ward. This news was welcomed and encouraged by our board and was applauded by the nearly 40 other attendees present at the meeting. The immediate and loud public outcry about what this building meant to the citizens of Salt Lake City following its partial demolition further emphasizes the cultural value and importance of this building. We honor and recognize the character that buildings like this have for the soul of our city and our neighborhood. We also recognize the cultural and environmental benefit of retaining existing structures. The Granary district has several prominent, well known and successful adaptive reuse projects including breweries (Fisher Brewing, Kiitos Brewing, TF Brewing), the Dunn Engineering Building, the currently under construction Pickle and Hyde buildings as well as the large, multi-million dollar Evo and Industry campuses. We are a neighborhood that values, preserves and activates our historic structures. We know that you are hearing many voices on the matter and wanted to make clear that the position from the GDA and Granary community that you have our full support in pursuing this matter with this irresponsible developer as aggressively as possible, including penalties, bans on future development activity, and mandates to restore the structure to its original condition, etc. We also encourage you and your teams to take further action using the tools at your disposal, to preserve important historic structures in the Granary and throughout Salt Lake City. Thank you for your attention to this matter and your continued care for our city and community. Sincerely, The Granary District Alliance Board 6/28/2024 16:58 Riley Cooney 0.5% sales tax increase - please vote 'no' Hi Daniel and City Council Members, I encourage you to vote 'no' on a 0.5% sales tax increase. I'm a young father and inflation has been hard enough. In fact, I'll routinely drive to Costco in Lehi to avoid the Salt Lake City sales tax. We are considering leaving Yalecrest because taxes are getting out of control vs other parts of the County and State. I grew up in Seattle and saw my hometown lose an NBA basketball team because they voted against a tax like this on behalf of Starbuck's CEO and team owner, Howard Shultz. Don't believe Ryan Smith if he tells you the team is going elsewhere, they are not. We will not lose the team. We will not lose natural capitalism which will take place around the stadium. We don't need another tax and if we ever want to save room for tax increases, we should not rush into this decision as proper non-partisan studies haven't taken place. A MLB team down the road may require a short-term increase in taxes, and such a scenario will drive significantly more traffic (80 home games per year, family friendly environment) vs revitalizing an area that will naturally correct itself. This tax is a slippery slope, paid for by Salt Lake City residents but enjoyed by the rest of the state as 'free-riders' - better tax the tickets for games and concerts, but not a sales tax on everyone that only benefits ~10% of the residents of the city. Riley Cooney & Madeline Huntsman Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/28/2024 17:00 Bernie Hart Bullying and harassing the homeless is now legal.... Andrew, ....and now that the Supreme Court has made harassing and bullying the mentally ill and addicted living on our streets legal, saying their names and telling their stories is even more important. Names added to the list: Mary, age 37 sleeps behind the bushes on 900S, is addicted and the victim of severe abuse and has reached out to the "we can help you" programs for help a number of times. She showed up last week with a black eye and crying. She spent that night behind the bushes on 600S. And Daniel.... and Dave.... and JoJo... and Bernie 6/29/2024 5:55 J R 3RD WORLD ROADS!!!!!!!!! Where the hell is all the TAX MONEY they have been collecting from us all these decades for ROAD REPAIRS!!!!!!!!!!!!???????????? They still look like 3rd world roads! Downtown & Sugar House! Etc... Some are like 1/2 done! Why the hell stop!!!!! Why not finish!!!! Who's going to pay for our car & tire repairs!!!!!!!!!!?????????? Whose greedy pocket has ALL OUR TAX MONEY!!!!!!!?????????????? This is REDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!! FIX IT NOW!!!!!!!!! OR I & our social media influencer accounts will ALL VOTE YOU OUT! 7/1/2024 9:20 Joe Mangum American Institute of Architects Utah Chapter Letter to the Editor re: Abravanel Hall Hello, The AIA Utah Chapter Board has recently sent a letter to the editor of the Salt Lake Tribune regarding the preservation of Abravanel Hall. I have been asked to forward this letter to select members of the county and city governments and press. Thank you for your time, Joe Mangum Office & Program Manager, AIA Utah Letter: Editor: The board of the Utah Chapter of the American Institute of Architects implores Salt Lake County to preserve the iconic Abravanel Hall. Abravanel Hall is a well-crafted example of 20th-century Utah civic architecture. It was designed in 1976 by Frank Ferguson, a prominent Utah architect and Fellow of the American Institute of Architects. Abravanel Hall’s distinctive characteristics are representative of its architectural type and period, its high artistic value, and its status as a significant and distinguishable entity, make it is a strong candidate for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Its noteworthy features include its angularity, verticality, natural light, and connection to the outdoors. Abravanel’s glass curtainwall looks out onto a distinctive civic plaza and Temple Square beyond. It is worthy of the investment of taxpayer dollars to upgrade and renovate it to modern standards. It is also the duty of our leaders to ensure that accurate and vetted information is evaluated and understood before deciding on the future of this beloved building. For example, does Abravanel Hall need to bear the full cost of renovating the mechanical system tied into the Salt Palace? Can other improvements, such as the plaza redesign, be phased in to make the costs more attainable? Cost estimates are most accurate when performed by a professional third party. The price of a new building needs to be based on an orchestral concert hall and not a multi-use venue. Where do these numbers come from and what do they include? What assurance do we have as patrons that a new building will have better acoustics, improved siting, quality materials, elegance, and stature? How much will this really cost? Most importantly, will it hold the same place in the community’s heart? We hope that Mayor Jenny Wilson honors her statement that the facility will stay in its present form and that necessary upgrades and creative solutions will be found that respect the building's integrity. Board of Directors American Institute of Architects, Utah Chapter Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/1/2024 9:38 TAYLOR WILLIAMS SEG Sports Complex Salt Lake Councilmembers, I spent a good amount of time pondering on what I might say to you in this letter. At the outset I admit that my entire intention is to persuade you to vote “No” on subsidizing the cost of a hockey arena and sports/entertainment district with the use of tax dollars. I considered how a few simple words make you reconsider a “yes” vote or reinforce a “no” vote. Perhaps I would talk about the economic research on stadium subsidies, the impact of inflation and building costs, the cultural and historical impacts of the suggested site, the problems with crony capitalism and corporate welfare, or maybe just remind you of Ryan Smith’s net worth. While each of these has merit, validity, and value, as I thought through them I realized each of these options essentially missed the central issue at hand: people. So instead of giving you numbers or principles or facts and figures, I simply ask that you go through a simple thought exercise: Think about a person(s) you know who lives in the city who is financially struggling. Maybe it’s a single parent who is working to provide for their children; maybe it’s a newlywed couple who is just starting out and is on the bottom rungs of the economic ladder; maybe it’s a family who is trying to manage finances due to the dramatic increased cost of housing in the area, or anyone else. Now imagine yourself standing in front of them and you deliver – essentially – this simple message: “I want you to know that I voted yes to increasing your taxes so a billionaire businessman can build a hockey stadium. It’s going to cost you roughly $250 more dollars each year for the next 30 years.” As you imagine this moment think about how you feel. Are you excited and proud at the decision you made? Are you nervous and reluctant? Are you bracing for backlash or waiting for a fist bump? If you can imagine yourself with certainty in that moment I think you already know how to vote. I do not envy your position. Some decisions for elected officials are easy; others are hard. Sometimes there is clearly a “right” or “wrong” answer; other times there isn’t a right or wrong and just tradeoffs. I can imagine that there is immense political pressure on you from outside groups, both in favor and against this proposal. Regardless the scale of difficulty of the choice before you one thing is certain: every choice made has a consequence and outcome. As you think through the choice before you, focus on how you will feel as you explain this vote to your constituents. Respectfully, Taylor Williams Deputy State Director AFP Utah 7/1/2024 10:57 Matthew Peterson Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Matthew Petersen Paradise , UT Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/1/2024 10:59 Lynn Pershing Sports district Good Morning Dan I am deeply concerned and disturbed to learn that SLC might allow the “give away” and destruction of our City’s grand and long historic support of our outstanding fine arts culture and the recognition of the critically important and often abused Japanese community that shaped our city. Our city, county and state has had unwavering support of the arts since its inception. The arts is what makes our city amongst the greatest in our nation independent of size and was one reason I decided to move here 47 years ago this month. It celebrates a learned culture, a place of inspiration, and sensual refuge from the onslaught of urban chaos There are many types of entertainment a city can add to their downtowns. Variety is essential. When I traveled to Boston I often attended the Boston Pops and Symphony. When I traveled to Washington DC, I always included some time to visit the city’s many art museums. I was better for it. Let’s create a city with diversity of entertainment with a diversity of prices and diversity of cultural groups. Sports venues are exceeding expensive, the arts, food and historic areas are accessible to all. Let’s transform our city that touted itself to be the “crossroads of the West” in the past to be a “crossroads to the world” with our new accessible airport in the future. Respectfully Lynn K Pershing 7/1/2024 11:42 Lowell Young Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Lowell Young American Fork, UT Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/1/2024 12:42 Alicia Ramirez homeless plan Salt Lake City Council I would like to request that the homeless plan be further extended to a later date before final vote on how funds should be spent regarding the homeless plan and all other plans put on hold due to lack of comments from those effected by homelessness due to lack of knowledge and not having the information givin to them about the plan that will greatly effect their quality of life on their human rights to comment for lack of knowledge of their human rights and of the homeless plans due to lack of devices and other resources to be able to get the information adequately to all those effected and making sure that they must know that their voices are important in a decision that is crucial to their human rights and their quality of life and have a right to be treated equal with dignity and respect and have the right to know that their comments will insure that the state use every maximum resource to insure everyone living in their juriiction has access to this informaation and that they have rights to essential levels of housing, and orher social , economics an cultural rights and they need to know that their comments will make sure that public funds must first be spent to house the homeless before considering other expenditures. They also have a right to know that no one deserves to be tortured or treated inhumane during the ebatements and their personal property , documents and things of sentimental value destroyed and disposed of causing irreprable damages to their mental health, physical health and to their psychological health causing the trauma that effects their health due to stress and anxiety of how the city has mishandled the homeless funding by creating more problems with the health of homelessness by funding what creates a bigger problem with their health causing them to be put in survival mode. I was unable to voice a comment on the 27th of June and I have evidence and screen shots of the emails i got back when i tried to comment on this plan. I am part of the Homeless society and i represent the homeless on these streets who are disable 7/1/2024 16:04 Kyle Stephens Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Kyle Stephens Logan, UT 7/1/2024 16:23 Brandon McReavy Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Brandon McReavy Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/1/2024 16:43 Ira Hinckley Say NO to SEG Please vote no to billionaire welfare and keep tax payer $ out of Sports leagues. I’m completely fine if the Jazz want to walk away from here. Good riddance. Even your own Planning Commission thinks this is a stupid idea. Ira Hinckley Resident. 7/2/2024 12:09 Herald dennis Dennis PIERCEY Comment on Entertainment District Hi, Darin! I thought I would share with you an email I've sent to Chris Wharton. --------------- Hi, Chris! I'm an attorney, we've talked a couple of times when you were canvassing in the Avenues. I'm interested in talking briefly to you about the proposal. I've spoken in public comment to the City Council before focused on the climate crisis. Long-term distractions from addressing climate seem the path societies have followed for decades now, a habit seemingly impossible to break. The entertainment district presents as top-down economics further entrenching money and power with tools aimed at amassing more money and power? In many ways, perhaps inexorable, but not impossible to imagine better. I appreciate your efforts. Nothing to do but try to have the positive impact we can, limited for us all. Dennis 7/2/2024 12:12 John Powell Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, John Powell TAYLORSVILLE, UT 7/2/2024 12:24 Nanette Olson Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Nanette Santaquin, UT Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/2/2024 12:32 Diane Hadley Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Diane Hadley Herriman, UT 7/2/2024 12:35 Bernie Hart Data shows.... Andrew, Our survey shows that every camper surveyed (168) is dealing with a mental health or addiction problem. All have been in a number of programs. All... not some ... not most ... but all. All a number of times. I believe further research will show that they have been in at least 15 programs. Is the problem really a result of being unhoused, or the result of our health system being unable to effectively help people with their mental health problems? If you help people struggling with mental health problems... they can find housing without our help.... and never leave the housing they were in before they moved to the streets... More surveys will just reinforce the idea that this is a mental health crisis, not a housing or homeless problem. Thanks, Bernie 7/2/2024 12:36 Adam Silver Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium . Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Adam Silver Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/2/2024 12:36 Bernie Hart Efficacy and Anosognosia Hi All, Change is difficult and how we deal with and understand our problems may be the key to overcoming many of the problems we face. The two words that have most impacted my work with the homeless and engagement with service providers and policy makers are: Efficacy... the questioning of current truths and the continuing search for a better more effective truth Anosognosia.... the denial that we have a problem, or thinking we already have a solution to a problem, but really don't. Anosognosia: It often seems that we are unable to convince someone that they/we/society have a problem and current solutions are not impacting the problem. Anosognosia is a mental health condition and words have no impact and thinking you can use words to convince someone dealing with anosognosia of anything may be as big a problem as the problem itself. If we are in denial, searching for or being open to considering a different truth is impossible. We just know we are right and we already know everything we need to know about almost everything. We do. Yes, we do. Just ask me. Efficacy: It is a simple thought. Maybe we can do better. But to even consider doing something better, we have to first acknowledge that our current ideas about anything and everything may not be the whole truth... Can someone struggling with anosognosia do that? Even when the number of homeless campers on our streets keeps growing and the number of teens taking their own lives keeps increasing... we believe our answers are answers. But are they.... really... Bernie 7/2/2024 12:37 Marilyn Neilson Abravanel Hall Exclude Abravanel Hall from sny new development Marilyn Neilson 7/2/2024 12:39 Adam Whipple Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Adam Whipple 7/2/2024 12:46 David Clark Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium . Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, David Clark Park City, UT Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/2/2024 13:40 Paula Morris Sales Tax Increase Mr. Dugan, I can see by the agenda released yesterday that the Council is very likely to endorse today the very rushed application for Mr. Smith. In spite of all the studies showing no economic benefit to these projects, the Council seems to be willing to go ahead with the project. I realize that the legislature has put a burden on the Council but the Council has done nothing at all (that I can see) to push back or ask for clarification. My husband and I have grown children with families who live in SLC and so the impact of the sales tax will be a large burden with no benefit to us as taxpayers. It has also been clear with the three different articles in the DNews this past ten days that the County will demolish Abravanel Hall. County Mayor Wilson, the UMOCA spokesperson, and now even the CEO of the Utah Symphony have seen the writing on the wall and if one reads between the lines, it is obvious that the Smith downtown "experience" will happen. It is amazing to us that with the long history of failed "revitalizations" of downtown that the Council is just going to repeat the mistakes of the past. Paula Morris 7/2/2024 13:42 John Neumann Hockey Entertainment District Yes to district, NO to tax increase! This is a private venture and should be supported by private funding/venture capital. Taxes should be used for “basic” community needs such as infrastructure. I am an avid hockey fan but making everyone pay for MY ENJOYMENT via taxation is ridiculous! Thank you! 7/2/2024 13:52 Amy G Carmen concerns Dan - Thanks for talking to me at the Wasatch Hollow meeting tonight. As I mentioned, I (and many others) have a lot of concerns and unanswered questions about the Smith sports area. Is there a website that gives the details about funding, design, traffic, timeline, etc.? Who could I contact with the legislature about the sports arena proposal? I’m on the Accessibility and Disability Commission for Salt Lake. I would really like to see someone hired to represent the ADA aspect as they design and build it. One major complaint through all the city is accessibility in construction areas. I will discuss this with the commission as a concern of mine. Change of subject - As I left the library tonight, I drove through the round about on Princeton/Herbert/Yale that is just west of the library. Why can’t they do that at the Bryan/Kensington/1950 E. intersection? It would definitely calm traffic and be more safe. Thanks for your time! Amy Carmen 7/2/2024 1:56 PM Tim May Emigration Canyon Development Councilman Dugan. I strongly oppose the development proposal being considered on June 26th. Do you have a position on this issue? Tim May 7/2/2024 14:05 Richard Price Emigration Canyon proposed development Mr. Dugan, Please strongly object to the proposal for the apartment complexes at the mouth of Emigration Canyon scheduled for the City Council Meeting on June 26th, 2024. The response by our East Bench Community Council reflects our views. Dr. and Mrs. Richard R. Price 7/2/2024 14:09 Kathie Supiano PhD, LCSW Public Hearing - Zoning change Mr Dugan Kathie and I reside in Emigration Oaks (Marathon Circle). We purchased this home 19 years ago precisely due to its location and ease of access to the UofU campus where we both work. We are strongly against this potential zoning change. The owners of the property knew the current zoning when they acquired the property, but now want to change the zoning to permit building a high-rise building. In addition to the eyesore in the mouth of the canyon, we are concerned about the increase the canyon traffic from additional residents and their friends and visitors. We each drive past this section of Emigration Canyon road at least twice a day where the access road would be built. We are also avid cyclists and similarly would need to traverse this additional point of access to the canyon road. We urge you to vote against this proposal during this week’s Planning Commission meeting. Best, - Mark & Kathie Supiano Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/2/2024 15:19 Rose Flores FEEDBACK - Kensington Ave/Ken Rey Street/Bryan Ave Intersection - Quick Build Project Dear Mr. Baranowski, cc: jon.larsen@slcgov.com dan.dugan@slcgov.com transportation@slcgov.com We are writing to you Mr. Baranowski as the project manager of the Kensington Ave & Ken Rey St. Quick Build Project, namely the installation of a traffic calming structure in the center of the intersection at Kensington Ave/Ken Rey Street/Bryan Avenue. This is our response to the city’s request for feedback about the project. We are writing to express our strong opposition to creating this temporary installation, and from what we understand, also the plan to install a more permanent structure at this location in the future. Here are the reasons for our opposition: 1. No notification, nor neighborhood input, nor traffic study before installation of the temporary structure. It is our understanding this project was begun because one or two neighbors complained about speeding in the area. We and other residents in the neighborhood were not notified before installation (either by the city or the neighbors who complained), nor given an opportunity to have input before installation, nor made aware of any traffic study done to warrant its installation. The structure just appeared one day, much to our collective surprise! 2. The configuration creates confusion now regarding where cars are supposed to drive through the intersection (to the left, or to the right, or to go around the structure like a roundabout). This could easily lead to collisions and property damage, and possible injuries. 3. The temporary structure is already proving to be a magnet for children in the neighborhood who have used it as a playground, sometimes inside the triangle and sometimes on the periphery. This creates a dangerous situation for the children and a stressful situation for drivers in the area. Children should not be playing in the street! And the city should not be enticing them to do so. This was not the case before this temporary structure was erected, but could be expected to continue if a permanent structure is installed. 4. If the traffic lanes are narrowed by a permanent structure, which is the case with the temporary structure now, emergency vehicles such as ambulances, and especially large fire trucks, will have great difficulty passing thru the intersection. Similar problems could be expected for snow plows, and garbage and recycling trucks. With the structure in place, and the allowing of on-street parking in front of the houses around the intersection, the lanes for thru traffic are and would be too small. Overall, there seems to be here an example of “If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.” Having lived here for 30+ years, we have not experienced, observed, nor heard of any substantial problems justifying such drastic change to that intersection. As we have noted, the temporary reflector post structure is already creating problems, and a permanent structure would be sure to cause even more serious problems. That said, if it is determined through more careful study that some traffic safety measure is justified, then reflector posts like those currently in place, but arranged in a smaller dimension, would be superior to a more obtrusive permanent structure, such as a concrete berm or barrier. Thank you for the opportunity to give input, and thank you in advance for taking our concerns into consideration. Sincerely, Robert Flores and Rose Gacnik- Flores Kathy Barnes Shu and Karen Cheng Rob and Sandy Rowland Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/2/2024 15:27 Thomas Lombardi please vote NO on Capital City Revitalization Zone proposal Mr. Dugan, I am a constituent of yours in District 6. I am writing to ask that as my elected representative, you vote against the proposed Capital City Revitalization Zone proposal. It is offensive that a regressive taxing mechanism is being proposed for a development which seems to disproportionately benefit the more well off in our society (SEG, developers, and those who can afford to purchase services at the proposed zone). I am also concerned with the lack of transparency (the city's revitalization zone website is conspicuously lacking proposal details and next steps/dates), lack of oversight of how city funds are allocated, the Planning Commission's unanimous vote against the proposed zoning changes, and the speed at which such huge decisions are being made. I am originally from Salt Lake, however, I have lived in 3 other larger metropolitan areas with multiple professional sports teams. Some of the renderings of the proposed sports venue remind me of LA Live, in Los Angeles. I have been there, it is over- rated, and to build something like that here would be a sad use of taxpayer funds. Also, as the Wasatch Front grows, it is not realistic for every single attraction to be located in Salt Lake and trying to achieve this goal will result in a perpetual cycle of the city's taxpayers being fleeced by the attraction's owners. I would prefer city funds be used to build something that benefits the majority of the citizens who spend a large amount of time in the city. Some city elected officials, such as our Mayor (I am unsure of your stance), cite the state's legislative deadline as the rationale for the hurried process. Hopefully, the citizens of Salt Lake have their own government representatives to provide balance and guard against the whims of the Utah State Legislature. If they are unable to do this, then what is the point of having the city government? Thank you for your representation. Sincerely, Tom -- Thomas Lombardi, M.D. 7/2/2024 15:42 Rich Jones Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Rich Jones West Valley Ut, UT 7/2/2024 15:46 Carol Cagle Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Carol CagleMidvale, UT Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 7/2/2024 15:49 Richard Weaver Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Richard Weave South Jordan, UT 7/2/2024 15:54 Cindy Yates Taxpayers don't want to subsidize stadium Dear City Councilmember: I urge you to oppose the proposed citywide sales tax increase that would give nearly $1 billion to the NHL sports/entertainment district. Inflation and growth have substantially increased the cost of housing, food, energy and other essential household expenses in recent years. These compounding costs amount to more than $11,000 a year for the average family of four! Many Salt Lake City residents simply cannot afford the additional estimated cost of $225 per year if this sales tax increase is approved. We should not be subsidizing businesses and billionaires at the expense of the average working family. The risks that private businesses choose to take should not be placed on the backs of taxpayers, especially when that business alone stands to reap the financial rewards! Study after study shows that these subsidies do not provide the promised economic benefits, and often leave taxpayers with broken promises and mounting costs in the long run. Please vote against this tax increase and subsidy! Sincerely, Cindy Yates PLEASANT GROVE, UT 7/2/2024 16:39 Denzel Eslinger No Tax increase for billionaires Listen, I get you want to change downtown, you have been trying for over 20 years to create something that will keep workers from leaving as soon as they are done working, that will bring people downtown in the evenings, or weekends. I understand the efforts, but it is time to stop rewarding billionaire businesses and individuals with taxpayer money. If SEG believes in this project then let them get private financing for it, let them take out loans, pay interest and make payments like every other person wanting to start or improve their business. I am a huge NHL fan and while I love them bringing a team to SLC, let them follow the model used in Vegas, a private entity bought and paid for the team, a private entity bought land and build the arena, because public funds should go to everyone not just people who can afford tickets to sporting or other events. Let those folks pay, put a $5 per ticket tax on every event there and let the people participating pay for it. Salt Lake City has real issues with homelessness, crime, an addiction crisis and there is no way anything should be done to make a multi-billionaire more wealthy while there are people suffering in poverty that are unable to get the help they need. It is time to simply say no to corporate welfare, I don't have a couple hundred dollars a year to pay so SEG can build things that will make them richer, let them pay their own bills. No taxes, no special lease offers, nothing, billionaires do not deserve my tax money and I don't deserve to pay more in taxes so they can get richer. 7/2/2024 19:29 Elise Lazar Sales tax increase for sports arena Not in support