HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/09/2024 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
WORK SESSION
July 9, 2024 Tuesday 3:30 PM
Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in
person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas.
Council Work Room
451 South State Street, Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
3:30 PM Work Session
Or immediately following the 2:00 PM
Community Reinvestment Agency Meeting
7:00 pm Formal Meeting
Room 315
(See separate agenda)
Welcome and public meeting rules
In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance, the meeting may be held electronically. After 5:00 p.m., please enter the
City & County Building through the main east entrance.
The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters. The public is welcome to listen. Items
scheduled on the Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and / or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting
based on circumstance or availability of speakers.
The Website addresses listed on the agenda may not be available after the Council votes on the item. Not all agenda items will
have a webpage for additional information read associated agenda paperwork.
Generated: 09:09:45
Note: Dates not identified in the project timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. Item start
times and durations are approximate and are subject to change.
Work Session Items
1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 3:30 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects
in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and
resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts,
and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
2.Ordinance: Form Based Zone Corrections Text Amendment ~ 3:45 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would correct various sections
of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Form Based Districts. Form Based
Districts were adopted in 2016 and amended in 2023. It has been found that certain
standards are incorrect, inconsistent, or incompatible with the intent of the chapter.
Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 20, 2024
3.Ordinance: Projecting Business Signs Zoning Text
Amendment ~ 4:05 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of
Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to projecting business signs. The proposal
would create consistency and update the standards for projecting business signs in
commercial and mixed-use districts. Other sections of Title 21A – Zoning may also be
amended as part of this petition to increase clarity in the sign ordinance.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 20, 2024
4.Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment to Allow Single-Family
Attached Dwellings in Select Commercial Zones ~ 4:25 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of
Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to allow single-family attached dwellings in select
commercial zones where multifamily dwellings are already permitted. The proposal
includes Community Business (CB), Community Shopping (CS), Commercial Corridor
(CC), General Commercial (CG), and Sugar House Business Districts (CSHBD 1 & 2)
districts. Petitioner: Natalie Linchenko of TAG SLC.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 20, 2024
5.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget: Capital Improvement Program
Follow-up ~ 4:45 p.m.
40 min.
The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about the City's Capital Improvement
Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings,
parks, streets or other city-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful
life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service
and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific
funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25CIP.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, June 6, 2024; Tuesday, July 2, 2024; and Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 11, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 9, 2024 at 7 p.m. and Tuesday,
August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 20, 2024
6.Capital City Revitalization Zone Participation Agreement
Follow-up TENTATIVE
15 min.
The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about the proposed participation agreement
and project area with the City and the Smith Entertainment Group (SEG). The proposed
participation agreement outlines how the City and SEG could utilize the proposed sales
tax revenue to develop the project area. The Council may consider adopting a resolution
during the July 9 formal meeting endorsing the proposed participation agreement and
project area. However, if the Council endorses the proposed participation agreement and
project area, state law dictates additional steps prior to the participation agreement and
project area being finalized. Once the Council endorses the proposed participation
agreement and project area, Section 63N-3-1306 of the Utah Code provides that the
state's Revitalization Zone Committee shall review the endorsed project area and
participation agreement. After the state's Revitalization Zone Committee reviews the
project area and participation agreement, then the City Council will again review the
project area and participation agreement for final approval.
For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCRevitalizationZone.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, April 16, 2024; Tuesday, May 7, 2024; Tuesday, June 11, 2024;
Tuesday, July 2, 2024 and Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 7, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 21, 2024 and Tuesday, June 11,
2024 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
7.Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund - Goat Head,
LLC.~ 5:40 p.m.
5 min.
The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would approve a $100,000.00
loan for Goat Head, LLC at 702 South 300 East from the Economic Development Loan
Fund (EDLF). Goat Head, LLC is a restaurant serving vegan and vegetarian food. This
loan will assist in the creation of four new jobs in the next year and the retention of two
current jobs.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
8.Board Appointment: City and County Building Conservation and
Use Committee – Caitlyn Barhorst ~ 5:45 p.m.
5 min
The Council will interview Caitlyn Barhorst prior to considering appointment to the City
and County Building Conservation and Use Committee Board for a term ending July 17,
2028.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
9.Board Appointment: City and County Building Conservation and
Use Committee – Mark Morris ~ 5:50 p.m.
5 min
The Council will interview Mark Morris prior to considering appointment to the City and
County Building Conservation and Use Committee Board for a term ending July 17,
2028.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
10.Ordinance: Prohibiting Distribution Centers on the
Former North Temple Landfill Site Written Briefing
-
The Council will receive a written briefing about a proposal that would prohibit
distribution centers on the former North Temple Landfill site at 6780 West North
Temple Street, located within the Northwest Quadrant Overlay. The proposal would add
a new definition for “Distribution Center,” as well as prohibit distribution-related uses
on the site. The intent of the proposal is to avoid the concentration of a single land use
and to allow for diverse uses as outlined in the Northwest Quadrant Master Plan. The
project is within Council District 1.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 20, 2024
11.Resolution: Salt Lake City Computers for the
Community Program Written Briefing
-
The Council will receive a written briefing about a resolution authorizing the donation of
up to 500 surplus City computers to benefit disadvantaged communities and low to
moderate-income families through the SLC Computers for the Community program.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 6 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 20, 2024
12.Resolution: Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the First
Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake
City Corporation, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake
City, and the Utah Inland Port Authority
Written Briefing
-
The Council will receive a written briefing about the first amendment to a resolution
authorizing the Mayor to execute the Interlocal Agreement in her capacity as the Mayor
of Salt Lake City Corporation and as the Executive Director of the Redevelopment
Agency of Salt Lake City with the Utah Inland Port Authority (UIPA). The City and UIPA
entered into a contract on October 25, 2022 to comply with changes made by the
Legislature in March 2022.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 9, 2024
Standing Items
13.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -
-
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
14.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -
-
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and
announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.
15.Tentative Closed Session -
-
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental
health of an individual;
b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i) public discussion of the transaction would:
(A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
(ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and
(iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent
requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 4:00 p.m. on Friday, July 5, 2024, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does
hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website
created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt
Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have
indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
Administrative
Updates
July 9, 2024
www.slc.gov/feedback/
Regularly updated with highlighted
ways to engage with the City.
Community Engagement Highlights
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.com
Planning
Thriving in Place
•E-bike Rebate Program
•Launched today, open until July 16
•Five local bike shops participating
•Two bike options
•Three income-based voucher options
•SLCgreen.com/ebike
•100 South Reconstruction
•2025 project is beginning planning now
•Website launch this week
Sustainability & Transportation
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.com
Planning slc.gov/planning
Thriving in PlaceMayor's Office Community Office Hours
Date Place Address Start End
07/15/2024 Avenues on Fourth Gift
Shop
376 E. 4th Ave.5:30 p.m.7:00 p.m.
08/06/2024 Westpointe Park
(Westpointe Night Out)
1920 Colonel Rd.6:00 p.m.7:00 p.m.
08/16/2024 Sugar House Rocks 2065 E. 2100 S.6:00 p.m.9:00 p.m.
08/17/2024 Three Creeks Confluence
(Jazz in the Park)
950 1300 S.5:30 p.m.7:00 p.m.
08/17/2024 Kensington Street Festival Kensington Ave. (between
State & Main)
2:00 p.m.8:00 p.m.
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.comThriving in PlaceEvents
Events are collected from ACE funded events, City sponsored events, and publicly permitted events. This is not
meant to be an all -inclusive list of all events going on in the City. Please verify information before attending.
Event Start Date Event Location Host ACE Funded
Continue Mission Family Night at the Ball Park 7/11/24 Smith's Ballpark Continue Mission Yes
Yappy Hour 7/11/24 Liberty Park Salt Lake City Corporation No
Homeless Resource Fair 7/12/24 Downtown Library SLC Homeless Engagement
and Response Team
No
Outdoor Film Series 7/12/24 Liberty Park Salt Lake City Events &
Utah Film Center
No
Downtown Farmers Market 7/13/24 & 7/20/24 Pioneer Park Urban Food Connections of
Utah
Yes
Focus on Fest July: Disability (See it This Way)7/17/24 Fit2Recover Mental Healthy F.i.T.Yes
2024 Inclusion Festival 7/18/24 Liberty Park Special Olympics Utah Yes
Outdoor Film Series 7/19/24 Liberty Park Salt Lake City Events &
Utah Film Center
No
Summer Series Queer Maker Market 7/20/24 Under the Umbrella
Bookstore
Under the Umbrella
Bookstore
Yes
3rd Annual The Cookout 7/21/24 Fairmont Park OurSundays Yes
Pioneer Day Drone Show 7/24/24 Liberty Park Salt Lake City Events No
Utah Native American Chamber of Commerce
Uniting Communities Powwow
7/24/24 Liberty Park Utah Native American
Chamber of Commerce
Yes
Olympic Announcement Celebration 7/24/24 Washington Square SLC No
________________
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Jill Love
Jill Love (May 9, 2024 09:13 MDT)Date Received:05/09/2024
Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 05/09/2024
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 05/07/24
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
_
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2024-00155 - Form Based Zone Corrections Text Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Noah Elmore, Associate Planner
noah.elmore@slcgov.com or (801) 535-7971
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the ordinance as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated a zoning text amendment
to correct sections in Chapter 21A.27 - Form Based Districts.
The code currently contains language exempting certain building additions from development
standards that regulate building form such as setback, height, density, and design standards.
Exempting additions from the zoning district’s regulations would effectively negate the intent of the
chapter, which is to regulate building form. This had been corrected in this proposal.
Changes to existing buildings that do not affect a building entrance should not trigger compliance with
entry features standards, and small additions should not trigger open space area requirements. The
standard for residential balconies is also revised to clarify that balconies must be looking out over a
public street as opposed to a side yard.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
Other revisions will be made to correct errors that occurred inadvertently through previously adopted
text amendments. First, there are specific street corners called out in the zoning ordinance which
permit additional building height. A footnote will be revised to identify the correct street references.
Additionally, the chapter regulating fences, walls, and hedges inadvertently excludes form based
zoning districts in the list of the “non-residential” districts. This amendment will revise that section to
clarify which chapters fall under “non-residential”, including the form based zoning districts. Finally,
the proposal includes reinsertion of a deleted requirement to screen dumpsters.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized
community organizations on February 8, 2024, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the
online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with
any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning
amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on March 25, 2024.
Public Open House: An online open house was held from February 12, 2024 to March 25, 2024.
No public comment was received.
Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 10,
2024. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the
proposed amendment.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of April 10, 2024 (Click to Access)
b)PC Minutes of April 10, 2024 (Click to Access)
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of April 10, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1) Project Chronology
2) Notice of City Council Public Hearing
3) Original Petition
_________________________
Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City
Project Title: Form Based Zone Corrections
Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-00155
Version: 1
Date Prepared: April 29, 2024
Planning Commission Action: Recommended 4/10/24
This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments to Title 21A. Zoning:
•Deletes subsection 21A.27.020.C;
•Amends subsection B, C.1 and C.2 of 21A.27.030 to include exemptions to existing
structures;
•Amends table 21A.27.050.C.3, footnote 1.c containing an incorrect street intersection;
•Amends subsections D.2 and E.1.a(4) of 21A.40.120 to make technical changes.
Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as
part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is
existing with no proposed change.
1 1. Deletes Subsection 21A.27.020.C
2 C. Building Form Standards:
3 1. The provisions of this section shall apply to all properties located within the Form
4 Based Districts as indicated on the maps in each Form Based District.
5 2. Building form and street type standards apply to all new buildings and additions when
6 the new construction related to the addition is greater than twenty five percent (25%)
7 of the footprint of the structure or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is less.
8 Refer to Section 21A.27.030 of this chapter on the building configuration standards
9 for more information on how to comply with the standards. The graphics included
10 provide a visual representation of the standards as a guide and are not meant to
11 supersede the standards in the tables. Only building forms identified in the table are
12 permitted.
13
14 2. Amends Subsection 21A.27.030.B as follows:
15 B. Building Entry: Refer to the building entrance standards in Subsection 21A.37.050.D of
16 this title. In the case of an existing structure, this standard shall only apply if changes are
17 made to the building entrance.
18
19 [No amendment to the tables or illustrations in said subsection.]
20
21 3. Amends Subsection 21A.27.030.C.1 as follows:
1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: April 29, 2024
By: _
Attorney
22 1. Open Space Area: A minimum of ten percent (10%) of the lot area shall be provided for
23 open space area, unless a different requirement is specified in the building form
24 regulation. Individual districts may require additional open space area requirements.
25 Open space area may include landscaped yards, patio, dining areas, common balconies,
26 rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private balconies shall not be
27 counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. Required parking lot
28 landscaping or perimeter parking lot landscaping shall also not count toward the
29 minimum open space area requirement. Additions to existing buildings are exempt from
30 this standard when the addition is less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the footprint of
31 the structure or one thousand (1,000) square feet, whichever is less.
32
33 4. Amends Subsection 21A.27.030.C.2 as follows:
34 2. Residential Balconies: All street facing residential units above the ground floor or level
35 shall contain a usable balcony facing the street that is a minimum of four feet in depth.
36 Balconies may overhang any required yard. All dwelling units located above the first
37 story and on a street-facing façade shall include a balcony. The balcony shall be
38 accessible from the dwelling unit and project a minimum of four feet from the street-
39 facing façade. Balconies may project into a required front yard setback. In the case of an
40 addition to an existing structure, this standard shall only apply to portions added along
41 street-facing elevations.
42
43 5. Amends Footnote 1.c to Table 21A.27.050.C.3 as follows:
44 c. For legally existing parcels or lots as of January 1, 2023 located on the corners of 200
45 West Temple at Fayette Avenue;
46
47 6. Amends Subsection 21A.40.120.D.2 as follows:
48 2. Nonresidential dDistricts (cChapters 21A.26 through 21A.34 of this title: commercial
49 districts, manufacturing districts, downtown districts, gateway districts, special
50 purpose districts and overlay districts):
51
52 7. Amends Section 21A.40.120 to adopt Subsection 21A.40.120.E.1.a(4) as follows:
53 (4) All refuse disposal and recycling dumpsters shall be screened on all sides by a solid
54 wood fence, masonry wall, or an equivalent opaque material to a height of not less
55 than 6 feet but not more than 8 feet.
56
57 [END]
2
1. CHRONOLOGY
Project Chronology
Petition: PLNPCM2024-00155
February 6, 2024 Petition initiated by Mayor Mendenhall.
February 6, 2024 Petition assigned to Noah Elmore, Associate Planner.
February 2024 –
March 2024
Staff drafted language to support goals of the petition.
February 8, 2024 Notice of petition sent to all city recognized community
organizations.
February 12, 2024 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House
webpage. Public comment period ended March 25, 2024
March 28, 2024 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and
emailed to the listserv.
April 4, 2024 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage.
April 10, 2024 Planning Commission meeting and public hearing held. A
positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council.
April 30, 2024 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s office.
2. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-00155 – Mayor Erin Mendenhall has
initiated a zoning text amendment to correct sections in Chapter 21A.27 - Form Based Districts. Form
Based Districts were adopted in 2016 and most recently amended in 2023. Over time, staff has found
certain standards to be incorrect, inconsistent, or otherwise incompatible with the intent of the chapter.
Related provisions of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. (Staff Contact: Noah Elmore
at (801) 535-7971 or noah.elmore@slcgov.com)
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments
regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this
issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same
night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
TIME: 7:00 pm
PLACE: Electronic and in-person options.
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person
opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located
at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including
WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments
may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an
email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are
shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Noah
Elmore at (801) 535-7971 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
or via e-mail at noah.elmore@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at
https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, selecting the “Planning” tab, and entering petition number
PLNPCM2024-00155.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7600, or relay service 711.
3. ORIGINAL
PETITION
DEP
PLANNING DIVISION
T of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODSARTMEN
M
To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Cc: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Blake Thomas, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director;
Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director
From: Nick Norris, Planning Director
Date: February 2, 2024
Re: Zoning Amendments to correct standards in Chapter 21A.27 - Form Based Districts
The Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a text amendment to modify sections in Chapter
21A.27 - Form Based Districts that are incorrect or inconsistent with the purpose of the district. More
specifically:
Subsection 21A.27.020.C Building Form Standards
The section contains language that exempts certain building additions from development
standards, such as setback, height, density and design standards. We propose to delete this
section because it conflicts with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance, and it is
inconsistent with the purpose of the district.
Section 21a.27.030: Building Configuration and Design Standards
Some exemption to building additions is warranted and will be included in this section. For
example, changes to existing buildings not affecting a building entrance will not require
compliance with entry features standards, and small additions will not trigger open space
area requirements.
Footnotes in Table 21a.27.050.C.3
A recent amendment inadvertently changed the streets identified in the footnote and which
allowed additional building height at a block corner. The error is clear because the street
intersection now identified in the code is outside of the Form Based district.
Any other inconsistent regulations or incorrect regulations that are identified as part of the project
will also be included in the proposal.
A public process will be conducted to gauge public input on the proposed changes and the proposal
will follow the same required steps of any other text amendment, including notification to recognized
community organizations, a public hearing with the Planning Commission and a decision from City
Council.
This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If
the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank.
Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made not to initiate
the petition.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV
PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174
EMORANDUM
Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you.
Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above.
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date
Form Based Zone Corrections Petition Intiation
Final Audit Report
Created:
By:
Status:
Transaction ID:
2024-02-02
Mayara Balhego De Lima (mayara.lima@slcgov.com)
Signed
CBJCHBCAABMOX6huP8OLsbboRlmuXLt9b1Yoz-CxY7b
2024-02-06
"Form Based Zone Corrections - Petition lntiation" History
f:l Document created by Mayara Balhego De Lima (mayara.lima@slcgov.com)
2024-02-02 - 4:26:20 PM GMT
g Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com) for signature
2024-02-02 - 4:26:52 PM GMT
f:l Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
2024-02-03 - 5:45:37 AM GMT
0o Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2024-02-06 - 11:24:25 PM GMT - Time Source: server
9 Agreement completed.
2024-02-06 - 11:24:25 PM GMT
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: Form Based Zone Corrections Text Amendment
PLNPCM2024-00155
The Council will be briefed about a proposal from the Administration to correct sections of Chapter 21A.27
Salt Lake City Code regarding form-based districts. In the time since form-based districts were adopted in
2016 and the ordinance was amended in 2023, Planning staff identified language that is incorrect,
inconsistent, or incompatible with the chapter’s intent. The purpose of this text amendment is to revise the
ordinance language, so it is correct, consistent, and compatible with the zoning chapter’s intent.
Form-based districts emphasize the built environment over land use and focus on the form of a
development, how buildings are oriented toward public spaces, development scale, and interaction of uses
within the city. These districts provide places for people to live, work and recreate.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its April 10, 2024 meeting and held a public hearing at
which no one spoke. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the proposed text amendment.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTION
1. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if there are concerns multiple small additions
could negatively impact required open space areas like the potential of bypassing building form and
street type standards discussed in consideration 2 below.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: July 9, 2024
Set Date: July 9, 2024
Public Hearing: August 13, 2024
Potential Action: August 20, 2024
Page | 2
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Current code language exempts some building additions from setback, height, density and design
standards which does not align with the chapter’s intent. The proposed changes include:
•Allow modifications to existing buildings which do not affect a building entrance to proceed
without requiring compliance with entry features standards.
•Small additions would not trigger open space area requirements.
•Clarification that balconies must look over a public street and not a side yard.
•Deletes a footnote error referencing the corner of West Temple and Fayette Avenue and adds the
correct corner of 200 West and Fayette Avenue in the list of street corners that allow additional
height.
•Requires screening of waste and recycling dumpsters.
•Deletes a list of nonresidential districts that inadvertently omitted form-based districts in the
chapter regulating fences, walls, and hedges. The proposed change references the correct range of
code chapters rather than listing individual districts.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 2-3 of the Planning
Commission staff report, and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning
Commission staff report.
Consideration 1 – Ensuring Language Reflects Intent
Proposed changes revise and clarify the ordinance to ensure the chapter’s language aligns with the intent.
Potential changes are listed in the bullet points above.
Consideration 2 – Potential Outcomes if Ordinance is Not Revised
Planning noted the current ordinance language allows building additions up to 25% of the footprint or
1,000 square feet, whichever is less, without a requirement to adhere to building form and street type
standards. It would be possible to add a series of 1,000 square foot additions to a building without
complying with these standards. It is Planning’s opinion that being able to bypass the standards
undermines the ordinance’s intent.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment B (pages 6-7) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning text amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are
summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as
stated through its various adopted planning documents.
Complies
Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may impose additional standards.
N/A
Page | 3
The extent to which a proposed text amendment
implements best current, professional practices of urban
planning and design.
Complies
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• February 6, 2024 – Petition initiated by Mayor Mendenhall and assigned to Noah Elmore,
Associate Planner.
• February-March 2024 – Planning staff drafted language to support goals of the petition.
• February 8, 2024 – Notice of petition sent to all City recognized community organizations.
• February 12, 2024 – Petition posted to the Planning Division’s online open house webpage.
• March 25, 2024 – 45-day recognized community organization public comment period ends.
• March 28, 2024 – Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the
Planning Division listserv.
• April 10, 2024 – Planning Commission briefing and public hearing. The Commission forwards a
unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council.
• April 10, 2024 – Planning Division requests ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office.
• April 30, 2024 – Ordinance from Attorney’s Office received by Planning Division.
• May 9, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: Projecting Business Signs Zoning Text Amendment
PLNPCM2023-00996
The Council will be briefed about a proposal requested by the Administration to allow signs that project off
the front business façade (frequently referred to as “blade signs”) in all commercial and mixed-use
districts. They are currently allowed in only some of these districts. (A complete list of current and
proposed zoning districts where the signs are and would be allowed is found in the Additional Information
section below.) These signs contain only the business name and/or company logo. They project out from a
building over the right-of-way as shown in the image below.
Proposed changes include reducing the minimum height above a sidewalk of a projecting building sign
from 10 feet to eight feet, and reducing the distance a sign can project from the building from six feet to
four feet. The draft ordinance includes language requiring signs that project over a public right of way must
comply with the City’s encroachment policy. In addition. language clarifying that signs will be measured to
the back of the curb is included in the draft ordinance. Minor grammatical corrections to the section of City
Code related to signs are also included in the proposed text amendment.
Planning staff suggested the Council may wish to consider allowing larger projecting signs in more intense
commercial zones. Planning stated “…the projecting sign size is 6 square feet per face in both CN and CG
zones, but the CG zone allows buildings that can be up to 100’ taller than the CN zone. This often results in
taller ground floors, which can accommodate larger projecting signs.”
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its February 14, 2024 meeting and held a public
hearing at which one person spoke in support of the proposed text amendment. The Commission voted
unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: July 9, 2024
Set Date: July 9, 2024
Public Hearing: August 13, 2024
Potential Action: August 20, 2024
Page | 2
Illustration of projecting business sign with proposed maximum distance
signs can project from a building, and minimum distance from the ground.
Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTION
1. The Council may wish to discuss whether to allow larger projecting business signs in more intense
commercial zones that have increased maximum height.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The proposed changes would create consistency for these signs in all commercial and mixed-use districts
throughout the city. The proposed text amendment would also align City Code with updated State statute
requirements and help reduce barriers in the sign code by adding signs that are more visible to those
passing by.
Currently projecting business signs are permitted in the following commercial and mixed-use zoning
districts:
•R-MU – Residential Mixed Use
•MU – Mixed Use
•SNB – Small Neighborhood Business
•CSHBD – Sugar House Business District (1 & 2)
•TSA – Transit Station Area
•D-1 – Central Business District
•D-4 – Downtown Secondary Central Business District
Page | 3
•G-MU – Gateway Mixed-Use
The proposal would allow these signs in the following additional zoning districts:
•RB – Residential Business
•RO – Residential Office
•CN – Neighborhood Commercial
•CB – Community Business
•CS – Community Shopping
•CG – General Commercial
•FB – Form Based Zones
•M-1 and M-2 – Light Manufacturing and Heavy Manufacturing
•D-2 – Downtown Support District
•D-3 – Downtown
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 2-3 of the Planning
Commission staff report, and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning staff
report.
Consideration 1 – How the proposal furthers City goals and policies identified in Plan Salt
Lake:
Planning staff found that the proposed amendment aligns with a goal in Plan Salt Lake to address existing
barriers to understanding and implementing code regulations. City code becomes more flexible as sign
options are increased. Cleaning up ordinance language and alphabetizing lists will make the code more
readable and help promote governmental transparency.
Consideration 2 – Impact to the City:
The proposed amendment would only impact signs in commercial and mixed-use districts in the city.
Because these signs are over pedestrian rights of way, Planning found the amendment would promote
walkability and accessibility by allowing the signs in these districts and promote sign type consistency
throughout the city. It is Planning staff’s opinion that the amendment’s overall impact will be positive.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment B (pages 42-43) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning text amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are
summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as
stated through its various adopted planning documents.
Complies
Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may impose additional standards.
N/A
(No overlay districts
are being amended)
Page | 4
The extent to which a proposed text amendment
implements best current, professional practices of urban
planning and design.
Complies
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• December 14, 2023 – Petition initiated by Salt Lake City Planning Division.
• December 15, 2023 – Petition assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner.
• December 21, 2023 – Early notification to all recognized community councils. 45-day comment
period begins.
• February 2, 2024 – Public hearing notice with project information and notice of the Planning
Commission public hearing physically posted at various library noticing points citywide.
• February 4, 2024 – 45-day recognized community organization notice period ends.
• February 14, 2024 – Planning Commission briefing and public hearing. The Commission forwards
a unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council.
• February 21, 2024 – Planning Division requests ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office.
• April 22, 2024 – Ordinance from Attorney’s Office received by Planning Division.
• May 2, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
City Council Briefing –July 9, 2024
PLNPCM2023-00996
ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT
–PROJECTING SIGNS
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT
This is a city-initiated petition to
update current zoning regulations to
allow projecting business signs as
an approved sign type in all
commercial and mixed-use
districts.
PC RECOMMENDATION
o Approval
Salt Lake City has proposed this amendment to
have consistent sign types within the commercial
and mixed-use zoning districts in the city.
500 South 500 South
2
0
0
W
e
s
t
2
0
0
W
e
s
t
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
•Addition of “Projecting Business Signs” to the table of
permitted signs in each commercial and mixed-use district.
•Update the minimum clearance requirement from 10’ to 8’
•Clarification requiring public property lease and insurance
for projections over right of way for projecting signs.
•Grammatical changes, such as ensuring alphabetical order.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
IMPACTED SECTIONS
General [Sign] Standards (21A.46.070)
Tables of Permitted Signs for Each of the Following Zones
•RB, RO (21A.46.080)
•R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU and MU (21A.46.090)
•CN, CB, CS, CC, CSHBD, CG (21A.46.090)
•FB (21A.46.096)
•M-1, M-2 (21A.46.100)
•D-1, D-2, D-3, and D-4 (21A.46.110)
•Live Performance Theatre and Ancillary Uses
(21A.46.110)
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
To:Start Date:
06/28/2024
Date Sent to Council:
07/02/2024Salt Lake City Council Chair
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Chair
From:
Employee Name:
Amann, Grant
E-mail
grant.amann@slcgov.com
Department
Community and Neighborhood
Department Director Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signature*
Director Signed Date Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
06/28/2024 07/02/2024
Subject:
PLNPCM2023-00996 - Zoning Text Amendment - Projecting Signs in All Commercial Districts
Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table
Kelsey Lindquist, kelsey.lindquist@slcgov.com
Document Type*Budget Impact*Budget Impact:
Ordinance Yes
No
Recommendation:*
Adopt the ordinance as recommended by Planning Commission
Background/Discussion (?)
The Salt Lake City Planning Division is proposing a zoning text amendment to primarily update the standards for projecting business
signs in commercial and mixed-use districts.
The proposed amendment adds language to permit projecting business signs (sometimes referred to as “blade signs”) in all commercial
and mixed-use districts. This text amendment will create consistent sign allowance for projecting business storefront signs in all
commercial and mixed-use districts. Minor grammatical corrections to Chapter 21A.46 Signs are also included in the amendment.
These modifications are in line with the update in the State requirements and seek to foster a beautiful city that is both adaptable and
responsive to evolving needs and priorities.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being proposed.
Amendments to 21A.46- Signs
·Reduce ground clearance from 10’ to 8’,which is in line with similar requirements for
projecting business signs nationwide.
·
·
·
·
Additional instance of language requiring public property lease and insurance for signs
projecting into the public right of way.
Addition of “Projecting Business Storefront Sign” in the Table of Permitted Signs for the
following districts: RB, RO, CN,CB, CS, CG, FB, M-1 and M-2, D-2, and D-3.
Re-ordering list items to ensure alphabetical order for each permitted sign type in each
Table of Permitted signs.
Re-written language clarifying that signs will be measured to the back of curb.
Will the City Council need to hold a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
PUBLIC PROCESS:•Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community Councils on December 21, 2023.o No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal.The Planning Commission public hearing was held on February 14th, 2024.The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposal as requested by theapplicant.
•
Chief Administrator Officer's Comments
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2023-00996 - Projecting Business Signs Zoning Text
Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Grant Amann, Principal Planner, grant.amann@slcgov.com, 801-535-6171
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Salt Lake City Planning Division is proposing a
zoning text amendment to primarily update the standards for projecting business signs in
commercial and mixed-use districts.
The proposed amendment adds language to permit projecting business signs (sometimes
referred to as “blade signs”) in all commercial and mixed-use districts. This text
amendment will create consistent sign allowance for projecting business storefront signs in
all commercial and mixed-use districts. Minor grammatical corrections to Chapter 21A.46
Signs are also included in the amendment.
These modifications are in line with the update in the State requirements and seek to support
businesses by removing barriers in the sign code for adding signs that are more visible to all passers-by
whether they are on the sidewalk, bike lanes, or in a vehicle.
The City Council may want to consider if it is also appropriate for more intense commercial zones to
allow larger projecting signs. For example, the projecting sign size is 6 square feet per face in both CN
and CG zone, but the CG zone allows buildings that can be up to 100' taller than the CN zone. This
often results in taller ground floors, which can accommodate larger projecting signs.
Example of a projecting business sign and required dimensions.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being
proposed.
1. Amendments to 21A.46 - Signs
• Reduce ground clearance from 10’ to 8’, which is in line with similar
requirements for projecting business signs nationwide.
• Additional instance of language requiring public property lease and insurance
for signs projecting into the public right of way.
• Addition of “Projecting Business Storefront Sign” in the Table of Permitted
Signs for the following districts: RB, RO, CN, CB, CS, CG, FB, M-1 and M-2,
D-2, and D-3.
• Re-ordering list items to ensure alphabetical order for each permitted sign type
in each Table of Permitted Signs.
• Re-written language clarifying that signs will be measured to the back of curb.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community
Councils on December 21, 2023.
o No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal.
• The Planning Commission public hearing was held on February 14th, 2024.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to
the City Council for the proposal as requested by the applicant.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of February 14, 2024 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of February 14, 2024 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of City Council Hearing
4. Petition Initiation Request
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
4. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST
1.ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE
VERSIONS
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2024
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to projecting business signs.)
An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant
to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00996 pertaining to the particular sign type “projecting business
storefront” sign in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts.
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning
Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall
to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to standards
regulating projecting business storefront signs in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00996; and
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said
petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.C. That Subsection
21A.46.070.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
C.Clearance Between Sign and Ground: A minimum clearance of eight feet (8’) shall be
provided between the ground and the bottom of any pole, projecting sign or flag.
1
SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.J. That Subsection
21A.46.070.J of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and hereby
is amended to read as follows:
J.Signs on Public Property: Except for portable signs authorized pursuant to Section
21A.46.055 of this chapter, no sign shall be located on publicly owned land or inside street rights
of way, except signs erected by permission of an authorized public agency, or the city pursuant
to the city's right of way encroachment policy.
SECTION 3. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.K.2. That Subsection
21A.46.070.K.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
2.Projecting Building Signs: Projecting building signs may extend a maximum of four feet
(4’) from the face of the building but shall not extend over a public right of way, unless such
projection complies with the city’s right of way encroachment policy.
SECTION 4. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.080.C. That Subsection
21A.46.080.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Residential
Districts: Sign Regulations for the RB and RO Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read
as follows:
C.Sign Regulations for the RB and RO Districts:
1. Purpose: The purpose of sign regulations for the RB and RO districts is to
establish standards that allow for modest commercial signage while protecting the
predominant residential character of these districts.
2.Applicability: Regulations in subsections C3 and C5 of this section, respectively,
shall apply to all uses within the RB and RO districts. These regulations apply to each lot,
regardless of the number of buildings on a lot.
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Regulations:
STANDARDS FOR THE RB DISTRICT
2
Type Of Signs Maximum Maximum Height Of
Freestanding Signs1
Minimum
Setback
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Permitted Area Per
Sign Face
Awning sign/
canopy sign
10 square See note 1
feet (sign
area only)
May extend 6
feet from face of door/window
building, but
1 per first floor
shall not extend
across a property
line
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
facethroughcanopy
face if
signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy
face if
signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square 4 feet
feet
5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Development
entry sign2
50 square 8 feet
feet
10 feet 1 per entry; 2
maximum
Flat sign3 20 square See note 1
feet
n/a 1 per lot
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square
feet
4 feet 5 feet
5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Monument
sign2
24 square 4 feet
feet
1 per lot
Nameplate 2 square
feet
See note 1 1 per building
entry
New
development
sign
80 square 10 feet
feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Political sign 16 square 4 feet
feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limitPrivate
directional
sign
8 square
feet
4 feet
3
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign sign side,
total of 12
6 square
feet per
n/a May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face of space or entry
the building but
no closer than 2
feet to the back
of curb.
square feet
Minimum height
of 8 feet above
sidewalk.4
Public safety
sign
8 square
feet
6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate
sign
8 square
feet
4 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Window sign 6 square
feet
See note 1 No limit
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
3. Backlit awnings excluded.
4. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
4.Illumination: Illuminated signs in the RB district shall be limited to development
entry signs, flat signs, window signs and monument signs.
5.Sign Type, Size and Height Regulations for the RO District:
STANDARDS FOR THE RO DISTRICT
Type Of Signs Maximum Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum Setback Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Permitted Area Per
Sign Face
Awning sign/
canopy sign
10 square
feet (sign
area only)
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of building, door/window
but shall not extend
1 per first floor
across a property line
Construction
sign
32 square
feet
4 feet
8 feet
5 feet
10 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Development
entry sign2
50 square
feet
1 per entry; 2
maximum
Flat sign3,4 6 square feet See note 1
for each 50
1 per street
frontage
4
feet of
building
frontage or
major
portion
thereof
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square feet 4 feet 5 feet
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
Monument
sign2
32 square
feet
4 feet 1 per street
frontage
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
New
development
sign
80 square
feet
10 feet
4 feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Political sign 16 square
feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limitPrivate8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
6 square feet n/a
per sign side,
May extend 4 feet
from face of the
1 per leasable
space or entry
Storefront Sign total of 12
square feet
building but no closer
than 2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum height of 8
feet above sidewalk.5
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate
sign
16 square
feet
6 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Window sign 6 square feet See note 1 n/a No limit
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
3. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
4. Backlit awnings excluded.
5. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
5
SECTION 5. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU and MU
Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU And MU
Districts:
STANDARDS FOR THE R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU AND MU DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Maximum
Area Per Sign Height Of
Maximum Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Limit On
Combined
Permitted Face Freestanding
Signs1
Permitted Per Number
Sign Type Of Signs4
May extend 1 per first floor NoneAwning sign/
canopy sign
1 square foot
per linear foot
of storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area only)
See note 1
6 feet from
face of
door/window
building 2
feet from
back of
curb6
Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
through face if signage
is on 2 faces.
20% of canopy
face if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
None
NoneFlat sign
(general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
See note 1 1 sign per
building
frontage
orientation)8
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)7,8 of store
frontage5
frontage5
1 square foot
per linear foot
See note 1
4 feet
n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
6
Monument
sign3
100 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
Nameplate 2 square feet
80 square feet
See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
1 per street
frontage
None
New
development
sign
Pole sign (1
acre
10 feet
25 feet
5 feet None
75 square feet 15 feet and
a 6 foot
1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
minimum)maximum
projection
frontage
Political sign
Private
16 square feet
8 square feet
6 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None
directional
sign
Projecting
business
storefront sign total of 12
square feet
6 square feet
per sign side,
See note 1 May extend 1 per leasable None
4 feet from
face of the
space. All
signs shall be
building but located within
no closer
than 2 feet
to the back
of curb. A
minimum
height of 8
feet above
the sidewalk
shall be
the tenant's
leasable space
maintained.
See note 6
5 feetPublic safety
sign
Real estate
sign
8 square feet
16 square feet
6 feet No limit None
None
None
6 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
No limitWindow sign 25% of See note 1
window area of
each use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback, unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
4. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
7
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
8. Backlit awnings excluded.
SECTION 6. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CN District) shall be, and hereby is
amended to read as follows:
4.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CN District:
STANDARDS FOR THE CN DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Limit On
Combined
Awning sign/ 1 square foot See note 1 May extend
6 feet from
face of
building, but
shall not
extend across
a property
line
1 per first floor None
door/windowcanopy sign per linear foot
of storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy,40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
None
drive- through canopy face if
signage is on 2
faces. 20% of
canopy face if
signs are on 4
faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet 2 per building
8
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)5
1 square foot
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
frontage4
Monument
sign
75 square feet 5 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 10 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Political sign 16 square feet 6 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square feet 4 feet
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet
per sign side;
total of 12
n/a May extend
4 feet from
face of the
building but
no closer
1 per leasable
space or entry
None
square feet
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneReal estate
sign
16 square feet 6 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
frontage4
See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
None
orientation)
Window sign 25% of See note 1 No limit
window area
of each use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
9
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 7. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.5. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CB District) shall be, and hereby is
amended to read as follows:
5.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CB District:
STANDARDS FOR THE CB DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs4
Limit On
Combined
Awning sign/
canopy sign
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
May extend 6 1 per first floor None
feet from face door/window
of building6
storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
1 per street
frontagethroughcanopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet 2 per building None
10
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)7
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of store
n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
frontage5
Monument
sign3
100 square
feet
6 feet
12 feet
20 feet
5 feet
10 feet
10 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
(1 acre mini-
mum)
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 10 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Pole sign3 (1
acre
minimum)
75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
business. 100
square feet
15 feet and a
maximum 6
foot
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
projection
for multiple
businesses
Political sign 16 square feet 6 feet
8 square feet 4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry
of the
None
square feet building but
no closer than
2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet
16 square feet 6 feet
5 feet
5 feet
n/a
No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat
sign (general
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
1 sign per
building
frontage
11
building
orientation)
building
frontage5
Window sign 25% of See note 1 n/a No limit None
window area
of each use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. Pole and monument signs shall be permitted only when located in or adjacent to a
required landscaped setback.
4. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
SECTION 8. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.B.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.B.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CS District: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
4.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CS DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback4
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning sign/ 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/ window
of building,
None
canopy sign per linear
foot of
storefront;
building
total not to
exceed 40
square feet
(sign area
only)
but shall not
extend across
a property line
12
Canopy,40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy face None
drive- through canopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet
n/a
2 per building None
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of store
1 per business or None
storefront
frontage5
Monument
sign2
100 square
feet
12 feet
6 feet
10 feet 1 per pad site 1 per pad site
5 feet
n/aNameplate2 square feet See note 1 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew
development
sign
200 square
feet per sign
12 feet
25 feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Pole sign2 75 square
feet
At the
approved
1 per pad site 1 per pad site
landscape
setback with a
6 foot
projection, but
shall not
extend across
a property line
Political sign 32 square
feet
8 feet 10 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square feet 4 feet
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry
of the building
None
square feet but no closer
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
13
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet
25 feet
1 per building
Shopping
center
200 square
feet
1 per street
frontage
identification
sign
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
building
frontage5
n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
None
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total See note 1
frontage
No limit
window area
per floor
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Permitted only for freestanding buildings within shopping centers.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 9. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.C.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.C.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CC District: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CC DISTRICT
14
Types Of Signs
Permitted Per
Use
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Limit On
Combined
Awnings/canopy 1 square foot See note 1 10 feet 1 per first floor None
door/windowsignsper linear
foot of
storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
None
canopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are on
4 faces
Construction
sign
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
1.5 square See note 1 1 per business None
or storefrontfeet per linear
foot of store
frontage5
Monument sign4 100 square 6 feet
12 feet
20 feet
None
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontagefeet
(1 acre
minimum)
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Pole sign4 75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
15 feet and 1 per street 1 per street
frontageafrontage
business, 100 maximum
15
square feet 6 foot
for multiple projection
businesses
Political sign 32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May 1 per leasable
space or entry
None
extend 4
feet from
face of the
building
but no
square feet
closer than
2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneReal estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat sign 1 square foot See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
(general
building
per linear
foot of
orientation)building
frontage5
25% of total
frontage
Window sign See note 1 No limit None
window area
per use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. See Subsection 21A.46.090.C.4.a of this section.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
16
SECTION 10. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.D.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.D.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CSHBD and CG Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CSHBD DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area
Per Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Types Of Signs Maximum Area
Permitted Per Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/window
of building 2
signs linear foot of
storefront (sign
area only)feet from back
of curb5
Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy See note 1
12 feet
n/a 1 per canopy face
through face if signage is
on 2 faces. 20%
of canopy face if
signs are on 4
faces
Construction
sign
64 square feet None
n/a
1 per street frontage
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
2 square feet per See note 1
linear foot of
store frontage4
1 per business or
storefront
Marquee sign 1 square foot per See note 1
linear foot of
store frontage
See 1 per storefront
Subsection
21A.46.070.O
NoneMonument
sign3
Nameplate
100 square feet 20 feet 1 per street frontage
1 per building entry2 square feet See note 1 n/a
17
New 80 square feet 12 feet None 1 per development
development
sign
Pole sign3 75 square feet for 25 feet
a single business,
100 square feet
for multiple
No extension 1 per street frontage
across a
property line
is permitted
businesses
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
21 square feet
8 feet
7 feet
None
None
No limit
No limit
directional sign
Projecting
building sign
0.5 square foot
per linear foot of
street frontage;
not to exceed 40
square feet
See note 1 May extend 6 1 per street frontage
feet from face
of building,
but shall not
cross a
property line
Projecting
business
6 square feet per See note 1
sign side, total of
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space. Leasable
storefront sign 12 square feet of a building
and 2 feet
from back of
curb5. A
minimum
height of 8
spaces on corners
may have 2. All
signs shall be
located within the
tenant's leasable
area and not on any
feet above the other tenant's
sidewalk shall leasable space
be maintained
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet None No limit
Real estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet None
n/a
1 per street frontage
1 per building faceWall sign or
flat sign
1 square foot per See note 1
linear foot of
(general building face4
building
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total See note 1 n/a No limit
frontage window
area per use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. See Subsection 21A.46.090.D.6.a.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
18
5. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
SECTION 11. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.D.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.D.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CSHBD and CG Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
4.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CG DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
Awning/canopy 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/window
of building,
but shall not
cross a
signs per linear foot
of storefront
(sign area
only)
property line
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy face
through canopy face if
signage is on
2 faces. 20%
of canopy
face if signs
are on 4 faces
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)5
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street frontage
2 square feet
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 1 per business or
storefront
frontage4
Marquee sign 1 square foot See note 1
per linear foot
of store
See
Subsection
21A.46.070.O
1 per storefront
frontage
Monument
sign3
1 square foot 20 feet
per linear foot
8 feet
4 feet
None
1 per street frontage
19
of street
frontage
2 square feet
200 square
feet
Nameplate
New
development
sign
See note 1
12 feet
n/a
5 feet
1 per building entry
1 per street frontage
Pole sign3 1 square foot 35 feet
per linear foot
of street
10 feet with a 1 per street frontage
maximum 6
foot
frontage; 200
square feet
maximum for
a single
business, 300
square feet
projection. No
extension
across a
property line
is permitted
maximum for
multiple
businesses
Political sign
Private
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign total of 12
square feet
6 square feet
per sign side;
NA May extend 4 1 per leasable space
feet from face or entry
of the
building but
no closer than
2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street frontage
Sexually See Section 21A.36.140
oriented
business signs
Wall sign or
flat sign
(general
building
1 square foot See note 1
per linear foot
of building
n/a
n/a
1 per building face
No limit
face4
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total
frontage
See note 1
20
window area
per use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. See Subsection 21A.46.090.D.6.a.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 12. Amending the text of Subsections 21A.46.096.B.11 and 12. That
Subsections 21A.46.096.B.11 and 12 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign
Regulations for Form Based Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
11.Projecting Sign:
21
22
Sign
Type
FB- FB-
UN1 UN2 MU
FB-FB-
SC
FB-SE MU-8 Specifications
Projecting
sign
P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners
may have 2.
Clearance
Area
Minimum of 8 feet above sidewalk/walkway.
6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total.
Maximum of 4 feet from building façade.Projection
Location
permitted
Private property or public street. Signs can face the
special purpose corridor but must be located on
private property. All signs are subject to the
requirements of the revocable permitting process.
12.Projecting Parking Entry Sign:
Sign
Type
FB- FB-
UN1 UN2 MU
FB-FB-
SC
FB-SE MU-8 Specifications
Projecting
parking
entry sign
(see
projecting
sign
P P P P Quantity 1 per parking entry.
Clearance
Height
Minimum of 8 feet above sidewalk/walkway.
Maximum of 2 feet.
Area
Projection
4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total.
Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for
public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet
within the special purpose corridor.
graphic)
Location
permitted
Private property or public street. Signs can face
the special purpose corridor but must be located on
private property. All signs are subject to the
requirements of the revocable permitting process.
23
SECTION 13. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.100.A.3. That Subsection
21A.46.100.A.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Manufacturing
Districts: Sign Regulations for the M-1 and M-2 Manufacturing Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE M-1 AND M-2 DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Maximum
Area Per
Maximum
Height Of
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Limit On
Combined
Permitted Sign Face Freestanding
Signs1
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Awning/
canopy signs foot per
1 square See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor None
feet from face door/window
of building,linear foot
of but shall not
storefront
(sign area
only)
cross a
property line
Canopy,
drive-
40% of
canopy
See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
through face if
signage is
on 2 faces;
20% of
canopy
face if
signs are
on 4 faces
Construction 64 square
sign feet
Development 160 square 10 feet
12 feet 10 feet
10 feet
1 per street
frontage
None
1 per street
frontageentry sign feet
maximum
per sign;
200 square
feet total
for 2 signs
24
Flat sign
(storefront
2 square
feet per
See note 1 n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
orientation)4 linear foot
of store
frontage6
Monument
sign5
150 square 5 feet at the 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
streetfeetminimum
setback and
increases 1
foot for each
additional 1
foot of
frontage
setback for a
maximum of
20 feet
New 160 square 12 feet 10 feet
15 feet
1 per street
frontage
None
development feet per
sign sign; 200
square feet
total
Pole sign5 1 square
foot per
linear foot
of street
frontage;
200 square
feet
25 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
maximum
for a
single
business,
300 square
feet
maximum
for
multiple
businesses
Political sign 32 square
feet
8 feet
4 feet
10 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square
feet
25
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square
feet per
sign side;
total of 12
square feet
n/a May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry.
of the building
but no closer
None
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety 8 square 6 feet 10 feet No limit None
None
sign feet
Real estate
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Sexually
oriented
business
signs
See Section 21A.36.140
Wall sign or 1.5 square See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
face
None
None
flat sign4 feet per
linear foot
of each
building
face
Window sign 25% of See note 1 No limit
total
frontage
window
area per
floor
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. See Subsection 21A.46.100.A.4.a.
6. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 14. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.a. That Subsection
21A.46.110.A.3.a of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
26
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-1 and D-4 Downtown Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
a. D-1 and D-4 Districts:
27
STANDARDS FOR THE D-1 AND D-4 DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Awning
signs
Maximum Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
1 per first floor
door/window
Limit On
Combined
Number Of Signs3
1 square foot per linear
foot of storefront (sign
area only)
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
n/a
None
Canopy,
drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces;
20% of canopy face if
signs are on 4 faces
1 square foot per linear
foot of storefront (sign
area only); 20 square feet
maximum per canopy
See note 1
See note 1
1 per canopy face
1 per first floor
None
NoneCanopy
signs
May extend from
face of building but building entry
not within 2 feet of
the back of curb6
Construction 64 square feet
sign
12 feet 5 feet 1 per storefront None
Corporate
flag
32 square feet See subsection
A4c of this section building but not
8 feet from face of 1 per 50 feet of street
frontage, 50 foot
2 per street frontage
within 2 feet of the minimum street
back of curb6
n/a
frontage required
1 per building
face
Flat sign
(general
building
orientation)
Flat sign
(storefront
4 square feet per linear
foot of building face5
See note 1
See note 1
None
None2 square feet per linear
foot of each store
n/a 1 per business
storefront
orientation)4 frontage5
28
Marquee
sign
Subject only to
Subsection
See Subsection
21A.46.070.O
See Subsection
21A.46.070.O
1 per storefront None
21A.46.070.O
Monument
sign
Nameplate, 3 square feet
building
New
development
sign
Outdoor
television
monitor4,7
Pole sign
1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage
20 feet None
None
5 feet
1 per street frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
None8 square feet
12 feet200 square feet 1 per street frontage None
None
None
62 square feet See note 1. Sign
face limited to 8
feet in height
45 feet
None 1 per building
1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage;
200 square feet
None, but shall not 1 per street frontage
extend across a
property line
maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Political
sign
Private
directional
sign
32 square feet 8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None8 square feet
Projecting
building
sign
125 square feet per side; See note 1.
250 square feet total (See
May extend 6 feet
from face of
1 per street frontage
(See
21A.46.110.A.4.b)
None
None
21A.46.110.A.4.b) building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 4 feet
from face of
Projecting
business
9 square feet per side; 18 See note 1. Sign 1 per public business
entry to the streetsquare feet total face limited to 4
feet in height building but not
29
storefront
sign
Projecting
parking
entry sign
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 4 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
None
9 square feet; 18 square
feet total
See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
1 per driveway or
parking lot entry
None
Public 8 square feet
32 square feet
6 square feet
8 feet
No limit None
None
None
safety sign
Real estate
sign
None
n/a
1 per street frontage
1 per street frontageRoof signs 4 square feet per linear
foot of building face or 6
square feet per linear
foot of building face on
buildings taller than 100
feet
See note 1
Window
sign
25% of total frontage
window area per use
No limit n/a No limit None
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs and outdoor television monitors limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Allowed in conjunction with television stations only and are allowed only if the building contains a permanent broadcast studio
for the television station of at least 15,000 square feet.
30
SECTION 15. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.c. That Subsection
21A.46.110.A.3.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-1 and D-4 Downtown Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
c.Live Performance Theater and Ancillary Uses Located in the Interior of the Block
between State and Main Streets, between 100 and 200 South Streets:
31
STANDARDS FOR THE LIVE PERFORMANCE THEATRE AND ANCILLARY USES LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF
THE BLOCK BETWEEN STATE AND MAIN STREETS, BETWEEN 100 AND 200 SOUTH STREETS
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum Height Minimum Setback2
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning signs 1 square foot per linear foot of See note 1
storefront (sign area only)
May extend 6 feet
from face of
1 per first floor
door/window
None
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
n/aCanopy,
drive-
through
40% of canopy face if signage See note 1
is on 2 faces; 20% of canopy
face if signs are on 4 faces
1 per canopy
face
None
NoneCanopy signs 1 square foot per linear foot of See note 1
storefront (sign area only); 20
square feet maximum per
May extend from
face of building but
not within 2 feet of
the back of curb6
5 feet
1 per first floor
building entry
canopy
Construction 64 square feet
sign
12 feet 1 per storefront None
Corporate
flag
32 square feet See Subsection
21A.46.110.A.4.c
8 feet from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
1 per 50 feet of
street frontage,
50 foot
minimum street
frontage required
2 per building
face
2 per street
frontage
Flat sign
(general
4 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
building face5
n/a None
building
orientation)
32
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Marquee sign Subject only to Subsection
21A.46.070.O
Monument
sign
Nameplate,
building
New
development
sign
2 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
each store frontage5
n/a 1 per business
storefront
None
NoneSee Subsection
21A.46.070.O
1 square foot per linear foot of 20 feet
See Subsection
21A.46.070.O
None
1 per storefront
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
None
street frontage
3 square feet 8 square feet
12 feet
None
5 feet200 square feet 1 per street
frontage
None
NonePole sign 1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 200 square feet
maximum for a single
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Pole sign,
parking
1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 165 square feet
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
1
garage access maximum for a single business
Sign may be located off
premises to indicate garage
access point, as deemed
appropriate by zoning
administrator
Political sign 32 square feet 8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate8 square feet
directional
sign
Projecting
building
sign7,8
165 square feet per side; 330
square feet total
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
2 per street
frontage
None
33
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
Projecting
business
storefront
sign7,8
9 square feet per side; 18
square feet total
See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
May extend 7 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 10 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
1 per public
business entry
None
NoneProjecting
parking entry total
sign7,8
40 square feet; 80 square feet See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
1 per driveway
or parking lot
entry
Public safety 8 square feet
sign
6 square feet
8 feet
None No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
32 square feet None
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
Roof signs 4 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
building face or 6 square feet
per linear foot of building face
on buildings taller than 100
feet
Window sign 25% of total frontage window No limit
area per use
n/a No limit None
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
34
7. This applies only to signs not placed on the street frontages of State Street, Main Streets, 100 South Street and 200 South
Street. All signs of this type intended for these street frontages are to be governed by Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.a.
8. These sign types may have animated elements as defined in Subsection 21A.46.020.B of this chapter, restricted to the non-
mechanical animation of lights and lighting.
35
SECTION 16. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.B.3. That Subsection
21A.46.110.B.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-2 District: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards) shall be,
and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
36
STANDARDS FOR THE D-2 DISTRICT
Types Of Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per linear foot See note 1 May extend 6 feet 1 per first floor None
sign of storefront (sign area only)from face of
building 2 feet
from back of curb7
n/a
door/window
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces; 20% of
canopy face if signs are on 4
faces
See note 1 1 per canopy face None
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per business or None
storefront
None
2 square feet per linear foot
of each store frontage5
See note 1
Monument sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot 20 feet None
None
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
None
of street frontage
Nameplate,
building
New
3 square feet 8 square feet
12 feet200 square feet 1 per street
frontage
None
development
sign
Pole sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot
of street frontage; 200 square
feet maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
45 feet None, but shall not 1 per street 1 sign per street
frontageextend across a
property line
frontage
37
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
8 square feet
8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None
directional sign
Projecting
building sign
0.5 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage; not to
exceed 40 square feet
See note 1 May extend 6 feet 1 per street None
from face of
building, but shall
not cross a
frontage
property line
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet per sign side;
total of 12 square feet
n/a May extend 4 feet 1 per leasable None
from face of the
building but no
closer than 2 feet
to the back of
curb. Minimum
height of 8 feet
above sidewalk.7
5 feet
space or entry
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign
8 square feet
64 square feet
6 feet No limit None
None
None
12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
face
Wall sign or flat 4 square feet per linear foot
sign (general
building
See note 1
of building face5
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total frontage
window area per use
See note 1 n/a No limit n/a
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
38
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. See Subsection 21A.46.110.B.4.a.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
39
SECTION 17. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.C.3. That Subsection
21A.46.110.C.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-3 Downtown Residential/Warehouse District) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
40
STANDARDS FOR THE D-3 DISTRICT
Types Of Signs Maximum Area Per Sign Maximum Height Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs Permitted Combined Number
Per Sign Type
1 per first floor
door/window
Limit On
Permitted Face Of Freestanding
Signs1 Of Signs3
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per linear See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building 2 feet from
back of curb6
n/a 1 per canopy face None
None
signs foot of storefront (sign
area only)
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces; 20%
of canopy face if signs are
on 4 faces
See note 1
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Monument sign
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
2 per building None
1.5 square feet per linear
foot of store frontage5
See note 1 1 per business or None
storefront
100 square feet
3 square feet
80 square feet
12 feet None
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
NoneNameplate,
building
New
8 square feet
12 feet 5 feet 1 per None
development
sign
development
Pole sign 75 square feet for a single 25 feet
business; 100 square feet
for multiple businesses
None, but shall not 1 per street 1 sign per street
frontageextend across a
property line
5 feet
frontage
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
8 square feet
8 feet
4 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None5 feet
directional sign
41
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet per sign side; n/a
total of 12 square feet
May extend 4 feet
from face of the
building but no
closer than 2 feet to
the back of curb.
Minimum height of
8 feet above
1 per leasable
space or entry
None
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign
Wall sign or flat 1.5 square feet per linear
sign (general
building
8 square feet
64 square feet
6 feet 5 feet No limit None
None12 feet
See note 1
5 feet
n/a
1 per building
1 per building
facefoot of building face5
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total frontage
window area per use
See note 1 n/a No limit None
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
42
SECTION 18. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2024.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Bill No. ________ of 2024.
Published: ______________.
April 22, 2024Date:
By: _
K orney
Ordinance for Projecting Signs(final)v1
43
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
1
2
3
4
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2024
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the
5
6
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to projecting business signs.)
7
8
An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant
to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00996 pertaining to the particular sign type “projecting business
storefront” sign in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts.9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning
Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall
to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to standards
regulating projecting business storefront signs in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00996; and
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said
petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.C. That Subsection
21A.46.070.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
24
25
C.Clearance Between Sign and Ground: A minimum clearance of ten eight feet (10' 8’)
shall be provided between the ground and the bottom of any pole, projecting sign or flag.
1
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
26
27
28
SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.J. That Subsection
21A.46.070.J of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and hereby
is amended to read as follows:
29
30
31
32
J.Signs on Public Property: Except for portable signs authorized pursuant to Section
21A.46.055 of this chapter, no sign shall be located on publicly owned land or inside street rights
of way, except signs erected by permission of an authorized public agency., or the city pursuant
to the city's right of way encroachment policy.
33
34
35
36
SECTION 3. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.K.2. That Subsection
21A.46.070.K.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
2.Projecting Building Signs: Projecting building signs may extend a maximum of six four
feet (6' 4’) from the face of the building but shall not extend over a public right of way, unless
such projection complies with the city’s right of way encroachment policy.except in the D-1 and
D-4 zones as allowed in Section 21A.46.110 of this chapter.
SECTION 4. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.080.C. That Subsection
21A.46.080.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Residential
Districts: Sign Regulations for the RB and RO Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read
as follows:
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
C.Sign Regulations Ffor Tthe RB Aand RO Districts:
1. Purpose: The purpose of sign regulations for the RB and RO districts is to
establish standards that allow for modest commercial signage while protecting the
predominant residential character of these districts.
2.Applicability: Regulations in subsections C3 and C5 of this section, respectively,
shall apply to all uses within the RB and RO districts. These regulations apply to each lot,
regardless of the number of buildings on a lot.
3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Regulations:
STANDARDS FOR THE RB DISTRICT
2
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Type Of Signs Maximum Maximum Height Of
Freestanding Signs1
Minimum
Setback
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Permitted Area Per
Sign Face
Awning sign/
canopy sign
10 square See note 1
feet (sign
area only)
May extend 6
feet from face of door/window
building, but
1 per first floor
shall not extend
across a property
line
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
facethroughcanopy
face if
signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy
face if
signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square 4 feet
feet
5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Development
entry sign2
50 square 8 feet
feet
10 feet 1 per entry; 2
maximum
Flat sign3 20 square See note 1
feet
n/a 1 per lot
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square
feet
4 feet 5 feet
5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Monument
sign2
24 square 4 feet
feet
1 per lot
Nameplate 2 square
feet
See note 1 1 per building
entry
New
development
sign
80 square 10 feet
feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Political sign 16 square 4 feet
feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limitPrivate
directional
sign
8 square
feet
4 feet
3
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign sign side,
total of 12
6 square
feet per
n/a May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face of space or entry
the building but
no closer than 2
square feet feet to the back
of curb.
Minimum height
of 8 feet above
sidewalk.4
Public safety
sign
8 square
feet
6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate
sign
8 square
feet
4 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Window sign 6 square
feet
See note 1 No limit
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070.JI of this chapter.
2. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
3. Backlit awnings excluded.
4. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
4.Illumination: Illuminated signs in the RB district shall be limited to development
entry signs, flat signs, window signs and monument signs.
5.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Regulations Ffor Tthe RO District:
STANDARDS FOR THE RO DISTRICT
Type Of Signs Maximum Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum Setback Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Permitted Area Per
Sign Face
Awning sign/
canopy sign
10 square
feet (sign
area only)
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of building, door/window
but shall not extend
1 per first floor
across a property line
Construction
sign
32 square
feet
4 feet
8 feet
5 feet
10 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Development
entry sign2
50 square
feet
1 per entry; 2
maximum
Flat sign3,4 6 square feet See note 1
for each 50
1 per street
frontage
4
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
feet of
building
frontage or
major
portion
thereof
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square feet 4 feet 5 feet
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
Monument
sign2
32 square
feet
4 feet 1 per street
frontage
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
New
development
sign
80 square
feet
10 feet
4 feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Political sign 16 square
feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limitPrivate8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
6 square feet n/a
per sign side,
May extend 4 feet
from face of the
1 per leasable
space or entry
Storefront Sign total of 12
square feet
building but no closer
than 2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum height of 8
feet above sidewalk.5
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate
sign
16 square
feet
6 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Window sign 6 square feet See note 1 n/a No limit
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
3. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
4. Backlit awnings excluded.
5. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
81
5
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
82
83
84
85
86
SECTION 5. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU and MU
Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
87
88
89
90
91
3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards Ffor Tthe R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU And MU
Districts:
STANDARDS FOR THE R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU AND MU DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Maximum
Area Per Sign Height Of
Maximum Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Limit On
Combined
Permitted Face Freestanding
Signs1
Permitted Per Number
Sign Type Of Signs4
May extend 1 per first floor NoneAwning sign/
canopy sign
1 square foot
per linear foot
of storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area only)
See note 1
6 feet from
face of
door/window
building 2
feet from
back of
curb6
Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
through face if signage
is on 2 faces.
20% of canopy
face if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
None
NoneFlat sign
(general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
See note 1 1 sign per
building
frontage
orientation)8
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)7,8 of store
frontage5
frontage5
1 square foot
per linear foot
See note 1
4 feet
n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
Monument and pole signs:
6
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Monument
sign3
100 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
1 sign per
street
Pole sign (1
acre
75 square feet 25 feet 15 feet and
a 6 foot
1 per street
frontage
minimum)maximum
projection
n/a
frontage
Nameplate 2 square feet
80 square feet
See note 1
10 feet
1 per building
entry
1 per street
frontage
None
NoneNew
development
sign
5 feet
Pole sign (1
acre
75 square feet 25 feet 15 feet and
a 6 foot
1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
minimum)maximum
projection
frontage
Political sign
Private
16 square feet
8 square feet
6 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None
directional
sign
Projecting
business
storefront sign total of 12
square feet
6 square feet
per sign side,
See note 1 May extend 1 per leasable None
4 feet from
face of the
space. All
signs shall be
building and located within
2 feet from
back of
the tenant's
leasable space
curb. but no
closer than 2
feet to the
back of
curb. A
minimum
height of 10
8 feet above
the sidewalk
shall be
maintained.
See note 6
5 feetPublic safety
sign
Real estate
sign
8 square feet
16 square feet
6 feet No limit None
None
None
6 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
No limitWindow sign 25% of See note 1
window area of
each use
92
7
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
93
94
95
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
96
97
3. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback, unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
98
99
4. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Projection
over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
8. Backlit awnings excluded.
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
SECTION 6. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CN District) shall be, and hereby is
amended to read as follows:
111 4.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards Ffor Tthe CN District:
112
113
STANDARDS FOR THE CN DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Limit On
Combined
Awning sign/ 1 square foot See note 1 May extend
6 feet from
face of
building, but
shall not
extend across
a property
line
1 per first floor None
door/windowcanopy sign per linear foot
of storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy,
drive- through canopy face if
signage is on 2
40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
faces. 20% of
8
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
canopy face if
signs are on 4
faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
n/a
2 per building None
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)5
1 square foot
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 1 per business None
or storefront
frontage4
Monument
sign
75 square feet 5 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 10 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Political sign 16 square feet 6 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square feet 4 feet
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet
per sign side;
total of 12
n/a May extend
4 feet from
face of the
building but
no closer
1 per leasable
space or entry
None
square feet
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneReal estate
sign
16 square feet 6 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
frontage4
See note 1 n/a 1 per building
frontage
None
orientation)
9
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Window sign
Notes:
25% of
window area
of each use
See note 1 n/a No limit None
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
124
125
126
127
128
SECTION 7. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.5. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CB District) shall be, and hereby is
amended to read as follows:
129
130
131
132
5.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards Ffor Tthe CB District:
STANDARDS FOR THE CB DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs4
Limit On
Combined
Awning sign/
canopy sign
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
May extend 6 1 per first floor None
feet from face door/window
of building6
storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy, drive- 40% of
through canopy face
if signage is
See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
1 per street
frontage
10
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
n/a
2 per building None
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)7
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of store
1 per business None
or storefront
frontage5
Monument and pole signs:
Monument
sign3
100 square
feet
6 feet
12 feet
20 feet
5 feet
10 feet
10 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
(1 acre mini-
mum)
Pole sign3 (1 75 square feet 25 feet 15 feet and a
maximum 6
foot
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontageacrefor a single
business. 100
square feet
for multiple
businesses
minimum)
projection
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 10 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Pole sign3 (1
acre
minimum)
75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
business. 100
square feet
15 feet and a
maximum 6
foot
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
projection
for multiple
businesses
Political sign 16 square feet 6 feet
8 square feet 4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry
of the
None
square feet building but
11
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
no closer than
2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet
5 feet
n/a
No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
16 square feet 6 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
1 sign per
building
frontage
orientation)building
frontage5
Window sign 25% of See note 1 n/a No limit None
window area
of each use
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. Pole and monument signs shall be permitted only when located in or adjacent to a
required landscaped setback.
4. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Projection
over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
145
146
147
148
SECTION 8. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.B.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.B.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CS District: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
149
150
151
152
153
4.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CS DISTRICT
12
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback4
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning sign/ 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/ window
of building,
None
canopy sign per linear
foot of
storefront;
building
total not to
exceed 40
square feet
(sign area
only)
but shall not
extend across
a property line
Canopy,40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy face None
drive- through canopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet
n/a
2 per building None
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of store
1 per business or None
storefront
frontage5
Monument and pole signs:
Monument
sign2
100 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet
5 feet
1 per pad site
1 per pad site
1 per pad site
6 feet
Pole sign2 75 square
feet
25 feet At the
approved
1 per pad site
landscape
setback with a
6 foot
projection, but
shall not
extend across
a property line
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
13
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
New
development
sign
200 square
feet per sign
12 feet
25 feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
Pole sign2 75 square
feet
At the
approved
1 per pad site 1 per pad site
landscape
setback with a
6 foot
projection, but
shall not
extend across
a property line
Political sign 32 square
feet
8 feet 10 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square feet 4 feet
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry
of the building
but no closer
None
square feet
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet
25 feet
1 per building
Shopping
center
200 square
feet
1 per street
frontage
identification
sign
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
building
frontage5
n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
None
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total See note 1
frontage
No limit
14
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
window area
per floor
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Permitted only for freestanding buildings within shopping centers.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
164
165
166
167
SECTION 9. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.C.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.C.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CC District: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
168
169
170
171
3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CC DISTRICT
Types Of Signs
Permitted Per
Use
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Limit On
Combined
Awnings/canopy 1 square foot See note 1 10 feet 1 per first floor None
door/windowsignsper linear
foot of
storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
15
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
None
canopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are on
4 faces
Construction
sign
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
1.5 square See note 1 1 per business None
or storefrontfeet per linear
foot of store
frontage5
Monument and pole signs:
Monument sign4 100 square
feet
6 feet
12 feet
20 feet
None
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
(1 acre
minimum)
75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
business, 100
square feet
for multiple
businesses
Pole sign4
Nameplate
15 feet and 1 per street 1 per street
frontageafrontage
maximum
6 foot
projection
2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Pole sign4 75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
15 feet and 1 per street 1 per street
frontageafrontage
business, 100
square feet
maximum
6 foot
for multiple projection
businesses
Political sign 32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet No limit None
16
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Private
directional sign
8 square feet 4 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneProjecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May 1 per leasable
space or entryextend 4
feet from
face of the
building
but no
square feet
closer than
2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneReal estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat sign 1 square foot See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
(general
building
per linear
foot of
orientation)building
frontage5
25% of total
frontage
window area
per use
Window sign
Notes:
See note 1 No limit None
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. See sSubsection 21A.46.090.C.4.a of this section.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
183
184
SECTION 10. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.D.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.D.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
17
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
185
186
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CSHBD and CG Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
187
188
189
190
3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CSHBD DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area
Per Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Types Of Signs Maximum Area
Permitted Per Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/window
of building 2
signs linear foot of
storefront (sign
area only)feet from back
of curb5
Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy See note 1
12 feet
n/a 1 per canopy face
through face if signage is
on 2 faces. 20%
of canopy face if
signs are on 4
faces
Construction
sign
64 square feet None
n/a
1 per street frontage
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
2 square feet per See note 1
linear foot of
store frontage4
1 per business or
storefront
Marquee sign 1 square foot per See note 1
linear foot of
store frontage
See 1 per storefront
sSubsection
21A.46.070.O
of this chapter
NoneMonument
sign3
100 square feet 20 feet 1 per street frontage
Nameplate
New
2 square feet
80 square feet
See note 1
12 feet
n/a
None
1 per building entry
1 per development
development
sign
Pole sign3 75 square feet for 25 feet
a single business,
No extension 1 per street frontage
across a
18
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
100 square feet property line
for multiple
businesses
is permitted
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
21 square feet
8 feet
7 feet
None
None
No limit
No limit
directional sign
Projecting
building sign
0.5 square foot
per linear foot of
street frontage;
not to exceed 40
square feet
See note 1 May extend 6 1 per street frontage
feet from face
of building,
but shall not
cross a
property line
Projecting
business
6 square feet per See note 1
sign side, total of
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space. Leasable
storefront sign 12 square feet of a building
and 2 feet
from back of
curb5. A
spaces on corners
may have 2. All
signs shall be
located within the
tenant's leasableminimum
height of 10 8 area and not on any
feet above the other tenant's
sidewalk shall leasable space
be maintained
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet None No limit
Real estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet None
n/a
1 per street frontage
1 per building faceWall sign or
flat sign
1 square foot per See note 1
linear foot of
(general building face4
building
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total See note 1 n/a No limit
frontage window
area per use
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. See sSubsection 21A.46.090.D.6.a of this section.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Projection
over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
19
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
202
203
204
205
SECTION 11. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.D.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.D.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CSHBD and CG Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
206
207
208
209
4.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CG DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
Awning/canopy 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/window
of building,
but shall not
cross a
signs per linear foot
of storefront
(sign area
only)
property line
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy face
through canopy face if
signage is on
2 faces. 20%
of canopy
face if signs
are on 4 faces
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)5
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street frontage
2 square feet
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 1 per business or
storefront
frontage4
Marquee sign 1 square foot
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 See 1 per storefront
sSubsection
21A.46.070.O
of this chapter
4 feet
frontage
Monument
sign3
1 square foot
per linear foot
of street
frontage
2 square feet
20 feet 1 per street frontage
1 per building entry
8 feet None
n/aNameplateSee note 1
20
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
New
development
sign
200 square
feet
12 feet
35 feet
5 feet 1 per street frontage
Pole sign3 1 square foot
per linear foot
of street
10 feet with a 1 per street frontage
maximum 6
foot
frontage; 200
square feet
maximum for
a single
business, 300
square feet
maximum for
multiple
projection. No
extension
across a
property line
is permitted
businesses
Political sign
Private
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign total of 12
square feet
6 square feet
per sign side;
NA May extend 4 1 per leasable space
feet from face or entry
of the
building but
no closer than
2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
1 per street frontage
Sexually See sSection 21A.36.140 of this title
oriented
business signs
Wall sign or
flat sign
(general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
face4
See note 1
See note 1
n/a
n/a
1 per building face
No limit
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total
frontage
window area
per use
210
211 Notes:
21
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. See sSubsection 21A.46.090.D.6.a of this section.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
220
221
222
223
SECTION 12. Amending the text of Subsections 21A.46.096.B.11 and 12. That
Subsections 21A.46.096.B.11 and 12 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign
Regulations for Form Based Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
224
225
11.Projecting Sign:
226
22
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Sign
Type
FB- FB-
UN1 UN2 MU
FB-FB-
SC
FB-SE MU-8 Specifications
Projecting
sign
P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners
may have 2.
Clearance
Area
Minimum of 10 8 feet above sidewalk/walkway.
6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total.
Maximum of 4 feet from building façade.Projection
Location
permitted
Private property or public street. Signs can face the
special purpose corridor but must be located on
private property. All signs are subject to the
requirements of the revocable permitting process.
227
228
229
12.Projecting Parking Entry Sign:
Sign
Type
FB- FB-
UN1 UN2 MU
FB-FB-
SC
FB-SE MU-8 Specifications
Projecting
parking
entry sign
(see
projecting
sign
P P P P Quantity 1 per parking entry.
Clearance
Height
Minimum of 10 8 feet above sidewalk/walkway.
Maximum of 2 feet.
Area
Projection
4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total.
Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for
public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet
within the special purpose corridor.
graphic)
Location
permitted
Private property or public street. Signs can face
the special purpose corridor but must be located on
private property. All signs are subject to the
requirements of the revocable permitting process.
230
23
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
231
232 SECTION 13. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.100.A.3. That Subsection
21A.46.100.A.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Manufacturing
Districts: Sign Regulations for the M-1 and M-2 Manufacturing Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE M-1 AND M-2 DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Maximum
Area Per
Maximum
Height Of
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Limit On
Combined
Permitted Sign Face Freestanding
Signs1
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Awning/
canopy signs foot per
1 square See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor None
feet from face door/window
of building,linear foot
of but shall not
storefront
(sign area
only)
cross a
property line
Canopy,
drive-
40% of
canopy
See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
through face if
signage is
on 2 faces;
20% of
canopy
face if
signs are
on 4 faces
Construction 64 square
sign feet
Development 160 square 10 feet
12 feet 10 feet
10 feet
1 per street
frontage
None
1 per street
frontageentry sign feet
maximum
per sign;
200 square
feet total
for 2 signs
24
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Flat sign
(storefront
2 square
feet per
See note 1 n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
orientation)4 linear foot
of store
frontage6
Monument and pole signs:
Monument
sign5
150 square 5 feet at the 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
feet minimum
setback and
increases 1
foot for each
additional 1
foot of
setback for a
maximum of
20 feet
Pole sign5 1 square
foot per
linear foot
of street
frontage;
200 square
feet
25 feet 15 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
maximum
for a
single
business,
300 square
feet
maximum
for
multiple
businesses
New 160 square 12 feet 10 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
development feet per
sign sign; 200
square feet
total
25
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Pole sign5 1 square
foot per
linear foot
of street
frontage;
200 square
feet
25 feet 15 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
maximum
for a
single
business,
300 square
feet
maximum
for
multiple
businesses
Political sign 32 square
feet
8 feet
4 feet
10 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate8 square
feetdirectional
sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square
feet per
sign side;
total of 12
square feet
n/a May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry.
of the building
but no closer
None
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety 8 square 6 feet 10 feet No limit None
None
sign feet
Real estate
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Sexually
oriented
business
signs
See sSection 21A.36.140 of this title
Wall sign or 1.5 square See note 1 n/a
26
1 per building
face
None
flat sign4 feet per
linear foot
of each
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
building
face
Window sign 25% of
total
See note 1 n/a No limit None
frontage
window
area per
floor
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. See sSubsection 21A.46.100.A.4.a of this section.
6. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
251
252
253
254
SECTION 14. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.a. That Subsection
21A.46.110.A.3.a of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-1 and D-4 Downtown Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
255
256
257
3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
a. D-1 Aand D-4 Districts:
27
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
258
259
STANDARDS FOR THE D-1 AND D-4 DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Awning
signs
Maximum Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
1 per first floor
door/window
Limit On
Combined
Number Of Signs3
1 square foot per linear
foot of storefront (sign
area only)
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
n/a
None
Canopy,
drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces;
20% of canopy face if
signs are on 4 faces
1 square foot per linear
foot of storefront (sign
area only); 20 square feet
maximum per canopy
See note 1
See note 1
1 per canopy face
1 per first floor
None
NoneCanopy
signs
May extend from
face of building but building entry
not within 2 feet of
the back of curb6
Construction 64 square feet
sign
12 feet 5 feet 1 per storefront None
Corporate
flag
32 square feet See subsection
A4c of this section building but not
8 feet from face of 1 per 50 feet of street
frontage, 50 foot
2 per street frontage
within 2 feet of the minimum street
back of curb6 frontage required
1 per building
face
Flat sign
(general
building
orientation)
Flat sign
(storefront
4 square feet per linear
foot of building face5
See note 1
See note 1
n/a
n/a
None
None2 square feet per linear
foot of each store
1 per business
storefront
orientation)4 frontage5
28
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Marquee
sign
Subject only to
sSubsection
21A.46.070.O of this
chapter
See sSubsection
21A.46.070.O of
this chapter
See sSubsection
21A.46.070.O of
this chapter6
1 per storefront None
Monument,
pole, and
projecting
building
signs:
Monument
sign
Pole sign
1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage
1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage;
200 square feet
20 feet
45 feet
None 1 per street frontage 1 sign per street
frontage
None, but shall not 1 per street frontage
extend across a
property line
maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Projecting
building
sign
125 square feet per side; See note 1.
250 square feet total (See subsection
May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
None
1 per street frontage
(See subsection A4b
of this section)A4b of this
section)
Nameplate, 3 square feet
building
New
development
sign
Outdoor
television
monitor4,7
8 square feet
12 feet
1 per building None
None200 square feet 5 feet
None
1 per street frontage
62 square feet See note 1. Sign
face limited to 8
feet in height
1 per building None
29
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Pole sign 1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage;
200 square feet
45 feet None, but shall not 1 per street frontage
extend across a
property line
None
maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Political
sign
Private
directional
sign
32 square feet 8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None8 square feet
Projecting
building
sign
125 square feet per side; See note 1.
250 square feet total (See
May extend 6 feet
from face of
1 per street frontage
(See
21A.46.110.A.4.b)
None
None
None
21A.46.110.A.4.b) building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 4 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 4 feet
from face of
Projecting
business
storefront
sign
9 square feet per side; 18 See note 1. Sign 1 per public business
entry to the streetsquare feet total face limited to 4
feet in height
Projecting
parking
entry sign
9 square feet; 18 square
feet total
See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
1 per driveway or
parking lot entry
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
Public 8 square feet
32 square feet
6 square feet
8 feet
None No limit None
None
None
safety sign
Real estate
sign
None
n/a
1 per street frontage
1 per street frontageRoof signs 4 square feet per linear
foot of building face or 6
See note 1
30
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
square feet per linear
foot of building face on
buildings taller than 100
feet
Window
sign
25% of total frontage
window area per use
No limit n/a No limit None
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs and outdoor television monitors limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Projection over a public right of way must
comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Allowed in conjunction with television stations only and are allowed only if the building contains a permanent broadcast studio
for the television station of at least 15,000 square feet.
31
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
273
274
275
276
SECTION 15. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.c. That Subsection
21A.46.110.A.3.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-1 and D-4 Downtown Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
277
278
c.Live Performance Theater Aand Ancillary Uses Located Iin Tthe Interior Oof Tthe Block
Bbetween State Aand Main Streets, Bbetween 100 Aand 200 South Streets:
32
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
279
280
281
282
STANDARDS FOR THE LIVE PERFORMANCE THEATRE AND ANCILLARY USES LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF
THE BLOCK BETWEEN STATE AND MAIN STREETS, BETWEEN 100 AND 200 SOUTH STREETS
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum Height Minimum Setback2
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning signs 1 square foot per linear foot of See note 1
storefront (sign area only)
May extend 6 feet
from face of
1 per first floor
door/window
None
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
n/aCanopy,
drive-
through
40% of canopy face if signage See note 1
is on 2 faces; 20% of canopy
face if signs are on 4 faces
1 per canopy
face
None
NoneCanopy signs 1 square foot per linear foot of See note 1
storefront (sign area only); 20
square feet maximum per
May extend from
face of building but
not within 2 feet of
the back of curb6
5 feet
1 per first floor
building entry
canopy
Construction 64 square feet
sign
12 feet 1 per storefront None
Corporate
flag
32 square feet See sSubsection
21A.46.110.A.4.c
of this section
8 feet from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
1 per 50 feet of
street frontage,
50 foot
minimum street
frontage required
2 per building
face
2 per street
frontage
Flat sign
(general
4 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
building face5
n/a None
building
orientation)
33
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Marquee sign Subject only to sSubsection
21A.46.070.O of this chapter
2 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
each store frontage5
n/a 1 per business
storefront
None
NoneSee sSubsection
21A.46.070.O of
this chapter
See sSubsection
21A.46.070.O of this
chapter6
1 per storefront
Monument,
pole, and
projecting
building
signs:
Monument
sign
1 square foot per linear foot of 20 feet
street frontage
None 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per street
frontage
Pole sign 1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 200 square feet
maximum for a single
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Pole sign,
parking
1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 165 square feet
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
1
garage access maximum for a single business
Sign may be located off
premises to indicate garage
access point, as deemed
appropriate by Zoning
Administrator
Projecting
building
sign7,8
165 square feet per side; 330
square feet total
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
2 per street
frontage
34
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Nameplate,
building
New
development
sign
3 square feet 8 square feet
12 feet
None
5 feet
1 per building None
None200 square feet 1 per street
frontage
Pole sign 1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 200 square feet
maximum for a single
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
None
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Pole sign,
parking
1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 165 square feet
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
1
garage access maximum for a single business
Sign may be located off
premises to indicate garage
access point, as deemed
appropriate by zoning
administrator
Political sign 32 square feet 8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate8 square feet
directional
sign
Projecting
building
sign7,8
165 square feet per side; 330
square feet total
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 7 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
2 per street
frontage
None
NoneProjecting
business
storefront
sign7,8
9 square feet per side; 18
square feet total
See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
1 per public
business entry
35
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Projecting
parking entry total
sign7,8
40 square feet; 80 square feet See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
May extend 10 feet 1 per driveway
or parking lot
entry
None
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
NonePublic safety 8 square feet
sign
Real estate
sign
6 square feet
8 feet
No limit None
None
None
32 square feet None
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
Roof signs 4 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
building face or 6 square feet
per linear foot of building face
on buildings taller than 100
feet
Window sign 25% of total frontage window No limit
area per use
n/a No limit None
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line.Projection over a public right of way must
comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. This applies only to signs not placed on the street frontages of State Street, Main Streets, 100 South Street and 200 South
Street. All signs of this type intended for these street frontages are to be governed by sSubsection 21A.46.110.A.3.a of this
section.
8. These sign types may have animated elements as defined in sSubsection 21A.46.020.B of this chapter, restricted to the non-
mechanical animation of lights and lighting.
36
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
298
299
300
301
SECTION 16. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.B.3. That Subsection
21A.46.110.B.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-2 District: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards) shall be,
and hereby is amended to read as follows:
302 3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
37
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
303
304
305
STANDARDS FOR THE D-2 DISTRICT
Types Of Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per linear foot See note 1 May extend 6 feet 1 per first floor None
sign of storefront (sign area only)from face of
building 2 feet
from back of curb7
n/a
door/window
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces; 20% of
canopy face if signs are on 4
faces
See note 1 1 per canopy face None
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Monument and
pole signs:
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per business or
storefront
None
None2 square feet per linear foot
of each store frontage5
See note 1
Monument sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot 20 feet
45 feet
None 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per street
frontage
1 sign per street
frontage
of street frontage
Pole sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot
of street frontage; 200 square
feet maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
None, but shall not 1 per street
extend across a
property line
frontage
Nameplate,
building
3 square feet 8 square feet None 1 per building None
38
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
New
development
sign
200 square feet 12 feet
45 feet
5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
Pole sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot
of street frontage; 200 square
feet maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
None, but shall not 1 per street
extend across a
property line
1 sign per street
frontagefrontage
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
8 square feet
8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None
directional sign
Projecting
building sign
0.5 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage; not to
exceed 40 square feet
See note 1 May extend 6 feet 1 per street None
from face of
building, but shall
not cross a
frontage
property line
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet per sign side;
total of 12 square feet
n/a May extend 4 feet 1 per leasable None
from face of the
building but no
closer than 2 feet
to the back of
curb. Minimum
height of 8 feet
above sidewalk.7
5 feet
space or entry
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign
8 square feet
64 square feet
6 feet No limit None
None
None
12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
face
Wall sign or flat 4 square feet per linear foot
sign (general
building
See note 1
of building face5
orientation)
39
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Window sign
Notes:
25% of total frontage
window area per use
See note 1 n/a No limit n/a
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. See sSubsection 21A.46.110.B.4.a of this section.
7. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Projection over a public right of way must
comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
40
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
318
319
320
321
SECTION 17. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.C.3. That Subsection
21A.46.110.C.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-3 Downtown Residential/Warehouse District) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
322 3.Sign Type, Size Aand Height Standards:
41
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
323
324
325
STANDARDS FOR THE D-3 DISTRICT
Types Of Signs Maximum Area Per Sign Maximum Height Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs Permitted Combined Number
Per Sign Type
1 per first floor
door/window
Limit On
Permitted Face Of Freestanding
Signs1 Of Signs3
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per linear See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building 2 feet from
back of curb6
n/a 1 per canopy face None
None
signs foot of storefront (sign
area only)
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces; 20%
of canopy face if signs are
on 4 faces
See note 1
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Monument and
pole signs:
Monument sign
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
2 per building None
None1.5 square feet per linear
foot of store frontage5
See note 1 1 per business or
storefront
100 square feet 12 feet None 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per street
frontage
Pole sign 75 square feet for a single 25 feet
business; 100 square feet
for multiple businesses
None, but shall not 1 per street 1 sign per street
frontageextend across a
property line
n/a
frontage
Nameplate,
building
New
3 square feet
80 square feet
8 square feet
12 feet
1 per building None
None5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
42
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Pole sign 75 square feet for a single 25 feet None, but shall not 1 per street 1 sign per street
frontagebusiness; 100 square feet
for multiple businesses
32 square feet
extend across a
property line
5 feet
frontage
Political sign
Private
8 feet
4 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None8 square feet 5 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet per sign side; n/a
total of 12 square feet
May extend 4 feet
from face of the
building but no
closer than 2 feet to
the back of curb.
Minimum height of
8 feet above
1 per leasable
space or entry
None
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign
Wall sign or flat 1.5 square feet per linear
sign (general
building
8 square feet
64 square feet
6 feet 5 feet No limit None
None12 feet
See note 1
5 feet
n/a
1 per building
1 per building
facefoot of building face5
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total frontage
window area per use
See note 1 n/a No limit None
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see sSubsection 21A.46.070J.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Public property lease and insurance required for projection over property line. Projection over a public right of way must
comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
43
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
336
337
338
339
340
SECTION 18. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2024.
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2024.
Published: ______________.
362 Ordinance for Projecting Signs(legislative)v1
44
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition:PLNPCM2023-00996 –
Projecting Business Signs Zoning Text Amendment
December 14, 2023 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division
December 15, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00996 was assigned to Grant Amann,
Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
December 21, 2023 Early notification announcement of the project to all recognized
community councils, providing information about the proposal
and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45-
day input and comment period.
February 2, 2024
February 4, 2024
February 14, 2024
Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice
of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at
various library public noticing points city wide.
End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice
period.
Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a
positive recommendation to approve the proposed text
amendment.
February 21, 2024
April 22, 2024
Planning Department requested the official Ordinance language
from the City Attorney’s office.
Ordinance received from City Attorney’s office
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00996- Salt Lake City is
requesting to adopt new zoning regulations to allow projecting business signs as an
approved sign type in all commercial and mixed-use districts. The proposed regulation changes
will affect section 21A.46-Signs of the zoning ordinance. Related provisions of Title 21A-
Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition to increase clarity in the Sign ordinance.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and
County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more
information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-
Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All
comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com. The application details
can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the
petition number PLNPCM2023-00996
The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make
requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate
in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or
relay service 711.
4. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
jill love Date Received: 05/02/2024
Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 05/02/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 05/02/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
SUBJECT: Petition PLNPCM2023-00996 - Projecting Business Signs Zoning Text
Amendment
STAFF CONTACT: Grant Amann, Principal Planner, grant.amann@slcgov.com, 801-535-6171
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Salt Lake City Planning Division is proposing a
zoning text amendment to primarily update the standards for projecting business signs in
commercial and mixed-use districts.
The proposed amendment adds language to permit projecting business signs (sometimes
referred to as “blade signs”) in all commercial and mixed-use districts. This text amendment
will create consistent sign allowance for projecting business storefront signs in all commercial
and mixed-use districts. Minor grammatical corrections to Chapter 21A.46 Signs are also
included in the amendment.
These modifications are in line with the update in the State requirements and seek to support
businesses by removing barriers in the sign code for adding signs that are more visible to all passers-by
whether they are on the sidewalk, bike lanes, or in a vehicle.
The City Council may want to consider if it is also appropriate for more intense commercial zones to
allow larger projecting signs. For example, the projecting sign size is 6 square feet per face in both CN
and CG zone, but the CG zone allows buildings that can be up to 100' taller than the CN zone. This
often results in taller ground floors, which can accommodate larger projecting signs.
Example of a projecting business sign and required dimensions.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES:
The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being
proposed.
1. Amendments to 21A.46 - Signs
• Reduce ground clearance from 10’ to 8’, which is in line with similar
requirements for projecting business signs nationwide.
• Additional instance of language requiring public property lease and insurance
for signs projecting into the public right of way.
• Addition of “Projecting Business Storefront Sign” in the Table of Permitted
Signs for the following districts: RB, RO, CN, CB, CS, CG, FB, M-1 and M-2,
D-2, and D-3.
• Re-ordering list items to ensure alphabetical order for each permitted sign type
in each Table of Permitted Signs.
• Re-written language clarifying that signs will be measured to the back of curb.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
• Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community
Councils on December 21, 2023.
o No letters or emails were received in opposition to the proposal.
• The Planning Commission public hearing was held on February 14th, 2024.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to
the City Council for the proposal as requested by the applicant.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a) PC Agenda of February 14, 2024 (Click to Access)
b) PC Minutes of February 14, 2024 (Click to Access)
c) Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14, 2024 (Click to Access Report)
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance: Final and Legislative Versions
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of City Council Hearing
4. Petition Initiation Request
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
4. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST
1.ORDINANCE: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE
VERSIONS
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2024
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the
Salt Lake City Code pertaining to projecting business signs.)
An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant
to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00996 pertaining to the particular sign type “projecting business
storefront” sign in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts.
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning
Commission”) held a public hearing to consider a petition submitted by Mayor Erin Mendenhall
to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to standards
regulating projecting business storefront signs in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts
pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00996; and
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said
petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.C. That Subsection
21A.46.070.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
C.Clearance Between Sign and Ground: A minimum clearance of eight feet (8’) shall be
provided between the ground and the bottom of any pole, projecting sign or flag.
1
SECTION 2. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.J. That Subsection
21A.46.070.J of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and hereby
is amended to read as follows:
J.Signs on Public Property: Except for portable signs authorized pursuant to Section
21A.46.055 of this chapter, no sign shall be located on publicly owned land or inside street rights
of way, except signs erected by permission of an authorized public agency, or the city pursuant
to the city's right of way encroachment policy.
SECTION 3. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.070.K.2. That Subsection
21A.46.070.K.2 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: General Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
2.Projecting Building Signs: Projecting building signs may extend a maximum of four feet
(4’) from the face of the building but shall not extend over a public right of way, unless such
projection complies with the city’s right of way encroachment policy.
SECTION 4. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.080.C. That Subsection
21A.46.080.C of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Residential
Districts: Sign Regulations for the RB and RO Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read
as follows:
C.Sign Regulations for the RB and RO Districts:
1. Purpose: The purpose of sign regulations for the RB and RO districts is to
establish standards that allow for modest commercial signage while protecting the
predominant residential character of these districts.
2.Applicability: Regulations in subsections C3 and C5 of this section, respectively,
shall apply to all uses within the RB and RO districts. These regulations apply to each lot,
regardless of the number of buildings on a lot.
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Regulations:
STANDARDS FOR THE RB DISTRICT
2
Type Of Signs Maximum Maximum Height Of
Freestanding Signs1
Minimum
Setback
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Permitted Area Per
Sign Face
Awning sign/
canopy sign
10 square See note 1
feet (sign
area only)
May extend 6
feet from face of door/window
building, but
1 per first floor
shall not extend
across a property
line
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
facethroughcanopy
face if
signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy
face if
signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square 4 feet
feet
5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Development
entry sign2
50 square 8 feet
feet
10 feet 1 per entry; 2
maximum
Flat sign3 20 square See note 1
feet
n/a 1 per lot
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square
feet
4 feet 5 feet
5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Monument
sign2
24 square 4 feet
feet
1 per lot
Nameplate 2 square
feet
See note 1 1 per building
entry
New
development
sign
80 square 10 feet
feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Political sign 16 square 4 feet
feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limitPrivate
directional
sign
8 square
feet
4 feet
3
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign sign side,
total of 12
6 square
feet per
n/a May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face of space or entry
the building but
no closer than 2
feet to the back
of curb.
square feet
Minimum height
of 8 feet above
sidewalk.4
Public safety
sign
8 square
feet
6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate
sign
8 square
feet
4 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Window sign 6 square
feet
See note 1 No limit
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
3. Backlit awnings excluded.
4. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
4.Illumination: Illuminated signs in the RB district shall be limited to development
entry signs, flat signs, window signs and monument signs.
5.Sign Type, Size and Height Regulations for the RO District:
STANDARDS FOR THE RO DISTRICT
Type Of Signs Maximum Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum Setback Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Permitted Area Per
Sign Face
Awning sign/
canopy sign
10 square
feet (sign
area only)
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of building, door/window
but shall not extend
1 per first floor
across a property line
Construction
sign
32 square
feet
4 feet
8 feet
5 feet
10 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Development
entry sign2
50 square
feet
1 per entry; 2
maximum
Flat sign3,4 6 square feet See note 1
for each 50
1 per street
frontage
4
feet of
building
frontage or
major
portion
thereof
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square feet 4 feet 5 feet
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
Monument
sign2
32 square
feet
4 feet 1 per street
frontage
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
New
development
sign
80 square
feet
10 feet
4 feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Political sign 16 square
feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limitPrivate8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
6 square feet n/a
per sign side,
May extend 4 feet
from face of the
1 per leasable
space or entry
Storefront Sign total of 12
square feet
building but no closer
than 2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum height of 8
feet above sidewalk.5
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate
sign
16 square
feet
6 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Window sign 6 square feet See note 1 n/a No limit
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
3. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
4. Backlit awnings excluded.
5. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
5
SECTION 5. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU and MU
Districts) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU And MU
Districts:
STANDARDS FOR THE R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU AND MU DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Maximum
Area Per Sign Height Of
Maximum Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Limit On
Combined
Permitted Face Freestanding
Signs1
Permitted Per Number
Sign Type Of Signs4
May extend 1 per first floor NoneAwning sign/
canopy sign
1 square foot
per linear foot
of storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area only)
See note 1
6 feet from
face of
door/window
building 2
feet from
back of
curb6
Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
through face if signage
is on 2 faces.
20% of canopy
face if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
None
NoneFlat sign
(general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
See note 1 1 sign per
building
frontage
orientation)8
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)7,8 of store
frontage5
frontage5
1 square foot
per linear foot
See note 1
4 feet
n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
Garage/yard
sale sign
6 square feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
6
Monument
sign3
100 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
Nameplate 2 square feet
80 square feet
See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
1 per street
frontage
None
New
development
sign
Pole sign (1
acre
10 feet
25 feet
5 feet None
75 square feet 15 feet and
a 6 foot
1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
minimum)maximum
projection
frontage
Political sign
Private
16 square feet
8 square feet
6 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None
directional
sign
Projecting
business
storefront sign total of 12
square feet
6 square feet
per sign side,
See note 1 May extend 1 per leasable None
4 feet from
face of the
space. All
signs shall be
building but located within
no closer
than 2 feet
to the back
of curb. A
minimum
height of 8
feet above
the sidewalk
shall be
the tenant's
leasable space
maintained.
See note 6
5 feetPublic safety
sign
Real estate
sign
8 square feet
16 square feet
6 feet No limit None
None
None
6 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
No limitWindow sign 25% of See note 1
window area of
each use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. Monument signs shall have a 5 foot setback, unless integrated into the fence structure.
Height requirements for fence apply.
4. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
7
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
8. Backlit awnings excluded.
SECTION 6. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CN District) shall be, and hereby is
amended to read as follows:
4.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CN District:
STANDARDS FOR THE CN DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Limit On
Combined
Awning sign/ 1 square foot See note 1 May extend
6 feet from
face of
building, but
shall not
extend across
a property
line
1 per first floor None
door/windowcanopy sign per linear foot
of storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy,40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
None
drive- through canopy face if
signage is on 2
faces. 20% of
canopy face if
signs are on 4
faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet 2 per building
8
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)5
1 square foot
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
frontage4
Monument
sign
75 square feet 5 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
None
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 10 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Political sign 16 square feet 6 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square feet 4 feet
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet
per sign side;
total of 12
n/a May extend
4 feet from
face of the
building but
no closer
1 per leasable
space or entry
None
square feet
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneReal estate
sign
16 square feet 6 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot
per linear foot
of building
frontage4
See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
None
orientation)
Window sign 25% of See note 1 No limit
window area
of each use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
9
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 7. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.A.5. That Subsection
21A.46.090.A.5 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the R-MU-35, R-MU-45, R-MU, MU, SNB, CN and
CB Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CB District) shall be, and hereby is
amended to read as follows:
5.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards for the CB District:
STANDARDS FOR THE CB DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs4
Limit On
Combined
Awning sign/
canopy sign
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
May extend 6 1 per first floor None
feet from face door/window
of building6
storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
1 per street
frontagethroughcanopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet 2 per building None
10
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)7
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of store
n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
frontage5
Monument
sign3
100 square
feet
6 feet
12 feet
20 feet
5 feet
10 feet
10 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
(1 acre mini-
mum)
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 10 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Pole sign3 (1
acre
minimum)
75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
business. 100
square feet
15 feet and a
maximum 6
foot
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
projection
for multiple
businesses
Political sign 16 square feet 6 feet
8 square feet 4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry
of the
None
square feet building but
no closer than
2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet
16 square feet 6 feet
5 feet
5 feet
n/a
No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat
sign (general
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
1 sign per
building
frontage
11
building
orientation)
building
frontage5
Window sign 25% of See note 1 n/a No limit None
window area
of each use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. Pole and monument signs shall be permitted only when located in or adjacent to a
required landscaped setback.
4. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
SECTION 8. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.B.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.B.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CS District: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
4.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CS DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback4
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning sign/ 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/ window
of building,
None
canopy sign per linear
foot of
storefront;
building
total not to
exceed 40
square feet
(sign area
only)
but shall not
extend across
a property line
12
Canopy,40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy face None
drive- through canopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are
on 4 faces
Construction
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet
n/a
2 per building None
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of store
1 per business or None
storefront
frontage5
Monument
sign2
100 square
feet
12 feet
6 feet
10 feet 1 per pad site 1 per pad site
5 feet
n/aNameplate2 square feet See note 1 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew
development
sign
200 square
feet per sign
12 feet
25 feet
10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Pole sign2 75 square
feet
At the
approved
1 per pad site 1 per pad site
landscape
setback with a
6 foot
projection, but
shall not
extend across
a property line
Political sign 32 square
feet
8 feet 10 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square feet 4 feet
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry
of the building
None
square feet but no closer
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
13
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 10 feet
10 feet
10 feet
No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet
25 feet
1 per building
Shopping
center
200 square
feet
1 per street
frontage
identification
sign
Wall or flat
sign (general
building
1 square foot See note 1
per linear
foot of
building
frontage5
n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
None
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total See note 1
frontage
No limit
window area
per floor
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Permitted only for freestanding buildings within shopping centers.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 9. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.C.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.C.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CC District: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CC DISTRICT
14
Types Of Signs
Permitted Per
Use
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Limit On
Combined
Awnings/canopy 1 square foot See note 1 10 feet 1 per first floor None
door/windowsignsper linear
foot of
storefront;
building total
not to exceed
40 square feet
(sign area
only)
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
None
canopy face
if signage is
on 2 faces.
20% of
canopy face
if signs are on
4 faces
Construction
sign
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
1.5 square See note 1 1 per business None
or storefrontfeet per linear
foot of store
frontage5
Monument sign4 100 square 6 feet
12 feet
20 feet
None
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontagefeet
(1 acre
minimum)
Nameplate 2 square feet See note 1 n/a 1 per building
entry
None
NoneNew80 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per
development
sign
development
Pole sign4 75 square feet 25 feet
for a single
15 feet and 1 per street 1 per street
frontageafrontage
business, 100 maximum
15
square feet 6 foot
for multiple projection
businesses
Political sign 32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet n/a
per sign side;
total of 12
May 1 per leasable
space or entry
None
extend 4
feet from
face of the
building
but no
square feet
closer than
2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit None
NoneReal estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
Wall or flat sign 1 square foot See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
frontage
None
(general
building
per linear
foot of
orientation)building
frontage5
25% of total
frontage
Window sign See note 1 No limit None
window area
per use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. See Subsection 21A.46.090.C.4.a of this section.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
16
SECTION 10. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.D.3. That Subsection
21A.46.090.D.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CSHBD and CG Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CSHBD DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area
Per Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per
Sign Type
Types Of Signs Maximum Area
Permitted Per Sign Face
Maximum
Height Of
Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/window
of building 2
signs linear foot of
storefront (sign
area only)feet from back
of curb5
Canopy, drive- 40% of canopy See note 1
12 feet
n/a 1 per canopy face
through face if signage is
on 2 faces. 20%
of canopy face if
signs are on 4
faces
Construction
sign
64 square feet None
n/a
1 per street frontage
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)6
2 square feet per See note 1
linear foot of
store frontage4
1 per business or
storefront
Marquee sign 1 square foot per See note 1
linear foot of
store frontage
See 1 per storefront
Subsection
21A.46.070.O
NoneMonument
sign3
Nameplate
100 square feet 20 feet 1 per street frontage
1 per building entry2 square feet See note 1 n/a
17
New 80 square feet 12 feet None 1 per development
development
sign
Pole sign3 75 square feet for 25 feet
a single business,
100 square feet
for multiple
No extension 1 per street frontage
across a
property line
is permitted
businesses
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
21 square feet
8 feet
7 feet
None
None
No limit
No limit
directional sign
Projecting
building sign
0.5 square foot
per linear foot of
street frontage;
not to exceed 40
square feet
See note 1 May extend 6 1 per street frontage
feet from face
of building,
but shall not
cross a
property line
Projecting
business
6 square feet per See note 1
sign side, total of
May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space. Leasable
storefront sign 12 square feet of a building
and 2 feet
from back of
curb5. A
minimum
height of 8
spaces on corners
may have 2. All
signs shall be
located within the
tenant's leasable
area and not on any
feet above the other tenant's
sidewalk shall leasable space
be maintained
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet None No limit
Real estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet None
n/a
1 per street frontage
1 per building faceWall sign or
flat sign
1 square foot per See note 1
linear foot of
(general building face4
building
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total See note 1 n/a No limit
frontage window
area per use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. See Subsection 21A.46.090.D.6.a.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
18
5. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
6. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
SECTION 11. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.090.D.4. That Subsection
21A.46.090.D.4 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Mixed Use and
Commercial Districts: Sign Regulations for the CSHBD and CG Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
4.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE CG DISTRICT
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum
Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
Awning/canopy 1 square foot See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor
feet from face door/window
of building,
but shall not
cross a
signs per linear foot
of storefront
(sign area
only)
property line
Canopy, drive- 40% of See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy face
through canopy face if
signage is on
2 faces. 20%
of canopy
face if signs
are on 4 faces
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)5
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street frontage
2 square feet
per linear foot
of store
See note 1 1 per business or
storefront
frontage4
Marquee sign 1 square foot See note 1
per linear foot
of store
See
Subsection
21A.46.070.O
1 per storefront
frontage
Monument
sign3
1 square foot 20 feet
per linear foot
8 feet
4 feet
None
1 per street frontage
19
of street
frontage
2 square feet
200 square
feet
Nameplate
New
development
sign
See note 1
12 feet
n/a
5 feet
1 per building entry
1 per street frontage
Pole sign3 1 square foot 35 feet
per linear foot
of street
10 feet with a 1 per street frontage
maximum 6
foot
frontage; 200
square feet
maximum for
a single
business, 300
square feet
projection. No
extension
across a
property line
is permitted
maximum for
multiple
businesses
Political sign
Private
32 square feet 8 feet 5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit8 square feet 4 feet
directional sign
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign total of 12
square feet
6 square feet
per sign side;
NA May extend 4 1 per leasable space
feet from face or entry
of the
building but
no closer than
2 feet to the
back of curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
8 square feet 6 feet 5 feet No limit
Real estate sign 64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet 1 per street frontage
Sexually See Section 21A.36.140
oriented
business signs
Wall sign or
flat sign
(general
building
1 square foot See note 1
per linear foot
of building
n/a
n/a
1 per building face
No limit
face4
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total
frontage
See note 1
20
window area
per use
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. See Subsection 21A.46.090.D.6.a.
4. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 12. Amending the text of Subsections 21A.46.096.B.11 and 12. That
Subsections 21A.46.096.B.11 and 12 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign
Regulations for Form Based Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
11.Projecting Sign:
21
22
Sign
Type
FB- FB-
UN1 UN2 MU
FB-FB-
SC
FB-SE MU-8 Specifications
Projecting
sign
P P P P P Quantity 1 per leasable space. Leasable spaces on corners
may have 2.
Clearance
Area
Minimum of 8 feet above sidewalk/walkway.
6 square feet per side, 12 square feet total.
Maximum of 4 feet from building façade.Projection
Location
permitted
Private property or public street. Signs can face the
special purpose corridor but must be located on
private property. All signs are subject to the
requirements of the revocable permitting process.
12.Projecting Parking Entry Sign:
Sign
Type
FB- FB-
UN1 UN2 MU
FB-FB-
SC
FB-SE MU-8 Specifications
Projecting
parking
entry sign
(see
projecting
sign
P P P P Quantity 1 per parking entry.
Clearance
Height
Minimum of 8 feet above sidewalk/walkway.
Maximum of 2 feet.
Area
Projection
4 square feet per side, 8 square feet total.
Maximum of 4 feet from building facade for
public and private streets. Maximum of 2 feet
within the special purpose corridor.
graphic)
Location
permitted
Private property or public street. Signs can face
the special purpose corridor but must be located on
private property. All signs are subject to the
requirements of the revocable permitting process.
23
SECTION 13. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.100.A.3. That Subsection
21A.46.100.A.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Manufacturing
Districts: Sign Regulations for the M-1 and M-2 Manufacturing Districts: Sign Type, Size and
Height Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
STANDARDS FOR THE M-1 AND M-2 DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Maximum
Area Per
Maximum
Height Of
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs
Limit On
Combined
Permitted Sign Face Freestanding
Signs1
Permitted Per Number Of
Sign Type Signs3
Awning/
canopy signs foot per
1 square See note 1 May extend 6 1 per first floor None
feet from face door/window
of building,linear foot
of but shall not
storefront
(sign area
only)
cross a
property line
Canopy,
drive-
40% of
canopy
See note 1 n/a 1 per canopy
face
None
through face if
signage is
on 2 faces;
20% of
canopy
face if
signs are
on 4 faces
Construction 64 square
sign feet
Development 160 square 10 feet
12 feet 10 feet
10 feet
1 per street
frontage
None
1 per street
frontageentry sign feet
maximum
per sign;
200 square
feet total
for 2 signs
24
Flat sign
(storefront
2 square
feet per
See note 1 n/a 1 per business None
or storefront
orientation)4 linear foot
of store
frontage6
Monument
sign5
150 square 5 feet at the 5 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
streetfeetminimum
setback and
increases 1
foot for each
additional 1
foot of
frontage
setback for a
maximum of
20 feet
New 160 square 12 feet 10 feet
15 feet
1 per street
frontage
None
development feet per
sign sign; 200
square feet
total
Pole sign5 1 square
foot per
linear foot
of street
frontage;
200 square
feet
25 feet 1 per street
frontage
1 sign per
street
frontage
maximum
for a
single
business,
300 square
feet
maximum
for
multiple
businesses
Political sign 32 square
feet
8 feet
4 feet
10 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate
directional
sign
8 square
feet
25
Projecting
Business
Storefront
Sign
6 square
feet per
sign side;
total of 12
square feet
n/a May extend 4 1 per leasable
feet from face space or entry.
of the building
but no closer
None
than 2 feet to
the back of
curb.
Minimum
height of 8
feet above
sidewalk.7
Public safety 8 square 6 feet 10 feet No limit None
None
sign feet
Real estate
sign
64 square
feet
12 feet 10 feet 1 per street
frontage
Sexually
oriented
business
signs
See Section 21A.36.140
Wall sign or 1.5 square See note 1 n/a
n/a
1 per building
face
None
None
flat sign4 feet per
linear foot
of each
building
face
Window sign 25% of See note 1 No limit
total
frontage
window
area per
floor
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. See Subsection 21A.46.100.A.4.a.
6. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront
orientation and the general building orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
SECTION 14. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.a. That Subsection
21A.46.110.A.3.a of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
26
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-1 and D-4 Downtown Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
a. D-1 and D-4 Districts:
27
STANDARDS FOR THE D-1 AND D-4 DISTRICTS
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Awning
signs
Maximum Area Per
Sign Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of Signs
Permitted Per Sign
Type
1 per first floor
door/window
Limit On
Combined
Number Of Signs3
1 square foot per linear
foot of storefront (sign
area only)
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
n/a
None
Canopy,
drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces;
20% of canopy face if
signs are on 4 faces
1 square foot per linear
foot of storefront (sign
area only); 20 square feet
maximum per canopy
See note 1
See note 1
1 per canopy face
1 per first floor
None
NoneCanopy
signs
May extend from
face of building but building entry
not within 2 feet of
the back of curb6
Construction 64 square feet
sign
12 feet 5 feet 1 per storefront None
Corporate
flag
32 square feet See subsection
A4c of this section building but not
8 feet from face of 1 per 50 feet of street
frontage, 50 foot
2 per street frontage
within 2 feet of the minimum street
back of curb6
n/a
frontage required
1 per building
face
Flat sign
(general
building
orientation)
Flat sign
(storefront
4 square feet per linear
foot of building face5
See note 1
See note 1
None
None2 square feet per linear
foot of each store
n/a 1 per business
storefront
orientation)4 frontage5
28
Marquee
sign
Subject only to
Subsection
See Subsection
21A.46.070.O
See Subsection
21A.46.070.O
1 per storefront None
21A.46.070.O
Monument
sign
Nameplate, 3 square feet
building
New
development
sign
Outdoor
television
monitor4,7
Pole sign
1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage
20 feet None
None
5 feet
1 per street frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
None8 square feet
12 feet200 square feet 1 per street frontage None
None
None
62 square feet See note 1. Sign
face limited to 8
feet in height
45 feet
None 1 per building
1 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage;
200 square feet
None, but shall not 1 per street frontage
extend across a
property line
maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Political
sign
Private
directional
sign
32 square feet 8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None8 square feet
Projecting
building
sign
125 square feet per side; See note 1.
250 square feet total (See
May extend 6 feet
from face of
1 per street frontage
(See
21A.46.110.A.4.b)
None
None
21A.46.110.A.4.b) building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 4 feet
from face of
Projecting
business
9 square feet per side; 18 See note 1. Sign 1 per public business
entry to the streetsquare feet total face limited to 4
feet in height building but not
29
storefront
sign
Projecting
parking
entry sign
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 4 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
None
9 square feet; 18 square
feet total
See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
1 per driveway or
parking lot entry
None
Public 8 square feet
32 square feet
6 square feet
8 feet
No limit None
None
None
safety sign
Real estate
sign
None
n/a
1 per street frontage
1 per street frontageRoof signs 4 square feet per linear
foot of building face or 6
square feet per linear
foot of building face on
buildings taller than 100
feet
See note 1
Window
sign
25% of total frontage
window area per use
No limit n/a No limit None
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs and outdoor television monitors limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
7. Allowed in conjunction with television stations only and are allowed only if the building contains a permanent broadcast studio
for the television station of at least 15,000 square feet.
30
SECTION 15. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.c. That Subsection
21A.46.110.A.3.c of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-1 and D-4 Downtown Districts: Sign Type, Size and Height
Standards) shall be, and hereby is amended to read as follows:
c.Live Performance Theater and Ancillary Uses Located in the Interior of the Block
between State and Main Streets, between 100 and 200 South Streets:
31
STANDARDS FOR THE LIVE PERFORMANCE THEATRE AND ANCILLARY USES LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF
THE BLOCK BETWEEN STATE AND MAIN STREETS, BETWEEN 100 AND 200 SOUTH STREETS
Types Of
Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum Height Minimum Setback2
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning signs 1 square foot per linear foot of See note 1
storefront (sign area only)
May extend 6 feet
from face of
1 per first floor
door/window
None
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
n/aCanopy,
drive-
through
40% of canopy face if signage See note 1
is on 2 faces; 20% of canopy
face if signs are on 4 faces
1 per canopy
face
None
NoneCanopy signs 1 square foot per linear foot of See note 1
storefront (sign area only); 20
square feet maximum per
May extend from
face of building but
not within 2 feet of
the back of curb6
5 feet
1 per first floor
building entry
canopy
Construction 64 square feet
sign
12 feet 1 per storefront None
Corporate
flag
32 square feet See Subsection
21A.46.110.A.4.c
8 feet from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
1 per 50 feet of
street frontage,
50 foot
minimum street
frontage required
2 per building
face
2 per street
frontage
Flat sign
(general
4 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
building face5
n/a None
building
orientation)
32
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Marquee sign Subject only to Subsection
21A.46.070.O
Monument
sign
Nameplate,
building
New
development
sign
2 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
each store frontage5
n/a 1 per business
storefront
None
NoneSee Subsection
21A.46.070.O
1 square foot per linear foot of 20 feet
See Subsection
21A.46.070.O
None
1 per storefront
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
None
street frontage
3 square feet 8 square feet
12 feet
None
5 feet200 square feet 1 per street
frontage
None
NonePole sign 1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 200 square feet
maximum for a single
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
Pole sign,
parking
1 square foot per linear foot of 45 feet
street frontage; 165 square feet
None, but shall not
extend across a
property line
1 per street
frontage
1
garage access maximum for a single business
Sign may be located off
premises to indicate garage
access point, as deemed
appropriate by zoning
administrator
Political sign 32 square feet 8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
NonePrivate8 square feet
directional
sign
Projecting
building
sign7,8
165 square feet per side; 330
square feet total
See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building but not
2 per street
frontage
None
33
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
Projecting
business
storefront
sign7,8
9 square feet per side; 18
square feet total
See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
May extend 7 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
May extend 10 feet
from face of
building but not
within 2 feet of the
back of curb6
1 per public
business entry
None
NoneProjecting
parking entry total
sign7,8
40 square feet; 80 square feet See note 1. Sign
face limited to 4
feet in height
1 per driveway
or parking lot
entry
Public safety 8 square feet
sign
6 square feet
8 feet
None No limit None
None
None
Real estate
sign
32 square feet None
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per street
frontage
Roof signs 4 square feet per linear foot of See note 1
building face or 6 square feet
per linear foot of building face
on buildings taller than 100
feet
Window sign 25% of total frontage window No limit
area per use
n/a No limit None
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
34
7. This applies only to signs not placed on the street frontages of State Street, Main Streets, 100 South Street and 200 South
Street. All signs of this type intended for these street frontages are to be governed by Subsection 21A.46.110.A.3.a.
8. These sign types may have animated elements as defined in Subsection 21A.46.020.B of this chapter, restricted to the non-
mechanical animation of lights and lighting.
35
SECTION 16. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.B.3. That Subsection
21A.46.110.B.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-2 District: Sign Type, Size and Height Standards) shall be,
and hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
36
STANDARDS FOR THE D-2 DISTRICT
Types Of Signs
Permitted
Maximum Area Per Sign
Face
Maximum Height
Of Freestanding
Signs1
Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs Permitted
Per Sign Type
Limit On
Combined
Number Of
Signs3
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per linear foot See note 1 May extend 6 feet 1 per first floor None
sign of storefront (sign area only)from face of
building 2 feet
from back of curb7
n/a
door/window
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces; 20% of
canopy face if signs are on 4
faces
See note 1 1 per canopy face None
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per business or None
storefront
None
2 square feet per linear foot
of each store frontage5
See note 1
Monument sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot 20 feet None
None
5 feet
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
None
of street frontage
Nameplate,
building
New
3 square feet 8 square feet
12 feet200 square feet 1 per street
frontage
None
development
sign
Pole sign 6 1 square foot per linear foot
of street frontage; 200 square
feet maximum for a single
business, 300 square feet
maximum for multiple
businesses
45 feet None, but shall not 1 per street 1 sign per street
frontageextend across a
property line
frontage
37
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
8 square feet
8 feet
4 feet
5 feet
5 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None
directional sign
Projecting
building sign
0.5 square foot per linear
foot of street frontage; not to
exceed 40 square feet
See note 1 May extend 6 feet 1 per street None
from face of
building, but shall
not cross a
frontage
property line
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet per sign side;
total of 12 square feet
n/a May extend 4 feet 1 per leasable None
from face of the
building but no
closer than 2 feet
to the back of
curb. Minimum
height of 8 feet
above sidewalk.7
5 feet
space or entry
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign
8 square feet
64 square feet
6 feet No limit None
None
None
12 feet 5 feet
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
face
Wall sign or flat 4 square feet per linear foot
sign (general
building
See note 1
of building face5
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total frontage
window area per use
See note 1 n/a No limit n/a
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
38
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. See Subsection 21A.46.110.B.4.a.
7. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
39
SECTION 17. Amending the text of Subsection 21A.46.110.C.3. That Subsection
21A.46.110.C.3 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Signs: Sign Regulations for Downtown
Districts: Sign Regulations for the D-3 Downtown Residential/Warehouse District) shall be, and
hereby is amended to read as follows:
3.Sign Type, Size and Height Standards:
40
STANDARDS FOR THE D-3 DISTRICT
Types Of Signs Maximum Area Per Sign Maximum Height Minimum
Setback2
Number Of
Signs Permitted Combined Number
Per Sign Type
1 per first floor
door/window
Limit On
Permitted Face Of Freestanding
Signs1 Of Signs3
Awning/canopy 1 square foot per linear See note 1 May extend 6 feet
from face of
building 2 feet from
back of curb6
n/a 1 per canopy face None
None
signs foot of storefront (sign
area only)
Canopy, drive-
through
40% of canopy face if
signage is on 2 faces; 20%
of canopy face if signs are
on 4 faces
See note 1
Construction
sign
Flat sign
(storefront
orientation)4
Monument sign
64 square feet 12 feet 5 feet
n/a
2 per building None
1.5 square feet per linear
foot of store frontage5
See note 1 1 per business or None
storefront
100 square feet
3 square feet
80 square feet
12 feet None
n/a
1 per street
frontage
1 per building
1 sign per street
frontage
NoneNameplate,
building
New
8 square feet
12 feet 5 feet 1 per None
development
sign
development
Pole sign 75 square feet for a single 25 feet
business; 100 square feet
for multiple businesses
None, but shall not 1 per street 1 sign per street
frontageextend across a
property line
5 feet
frontage
Political sign
Private
32 square feet
8 square feet
8 feet
4 feet
No limit
No limit
None
None5 feet
directional sign
41
Projecting
Business
Storefront Sign
6 square feet per sign side; n/a
total of 12 square feet
May extend 4 feet
from face of the
building but no
closer than 2 feet to
the back of curb.
Minimum height of
8 feet above
1 per leasable
space or entry
None
sidewalk.6
Public safety
sign
Real estate sign
Wall sign or flat 1.5 square feet per linear
sign (general
building
8 square feet
64 square feet
6 feet 5 feet No limit None
None12 feet
See note 1
5 feet
n/a
1 per building
1 per building
facefoot of building face5
orientation)
Window sign 25% of total frontage
window area per use
See note 1 n/a No limit None
Notes:
1. For height limits on building signs, see Subsection 21A.46.070.I of this chapter.
2. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
3. The total number of signs permitted from the sign types combined.
4. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
5. A single-tenant building may combine the square footage total of both the storefront orientation and the general building
orientation flat signs to construct 1 larger sign.
6. Projection over a public right of way must comply with the city’s encroachment policy.
42
SECTION 18. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________,
2024.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Bill No. ________ of 2024.
Published: ______________.
April 22, 2024Date:
By: _
K orney
Ordinance for Projecting Signs(final)v1
43
2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition:PLNPCM2023-00996 –
Projecting Business Signs Zoning Text Amendment
December 14, 2023 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake
City Planning Division
December 15, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00996 was assigned to Grant Amann,
Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
December 21, 2023 Early notification announcement of the project to all recognized
community councils, providing information about the proposal
and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45-
day input and comment period.
February 2, 2024
February 4, 2024
February 14, 2024
Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice
of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at
various library public noticing points city wide.
End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice
period.
Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a
positive recommendation to approve the proposed text
amendment.
February 21, 2024
April 22, 2024
Planning Department requested the official Ordinance language
from the City Attorney’s office.
Ordinance received from City Attorney’s office
3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2023-00996- Salt Lake City is
requesting to adopt new zoning regulations to allow projecting business signs as an
approved sign type in all commercial and mixed-use districts. The proposed regulation changes
will affect section 21A.46-Signs of the zoning ordinance. Related provisions of Title 21A-
Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition to increase clarity in the Sign ordinance.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive
comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider
adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held
electronically:
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and
County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more
information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-
Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All
comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com. The application details
can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the
petition number PLNPCM2023-00996
The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make
requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate
in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or
relay service 711.
4. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST
jill love
jill love (May 2, 2024 14:56 MDT)
Signature:
Email: jill.love@slcgov.com
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM:Brian Fullmer
Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: Zoning Text Amendment to Allow Single-Family Attached Dwellings in Commercial Zones
PLNPCM2023-00894
The Council will be briefed about a proposal from TAG SLC to allow single-family attached dwellings as
permitted uses in commercial zones that currently allow multifamily buildings, which are typically
apartment buildings. Townhomes and row houses are common terms for single-family attached homes.
The petitioner stated their desire is to increase housing and home ownership options in the city.
The following zoning districts allow multifamily dwellings but not single-family attached homes:
•Community Business (CB)
•Community Shopping (CS)
•Commercial Corridor (CC)
•General Commercial (GC)
•Sugar House Business Districts (CSHBD 1 & 2)
A map showing the various affected zoning districts is below.
Item Schedule:
Briefing: July 9, 2024
Set Date: July 9, 2024
Public Hearing: August 13, 2024
Potential Action: August 20, 2024
Page | 2
Map showing properties potentially affected by proposed text amendment.
Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division
Page | 3
Planning staff is generally supportive of the proposal, except for including single-family attached dwellings
in the CSHBD and CB zoning districts. There is concern that the less dense townhome-style of buildings
that are typical of single-family attached housing might impact the Sugar House Business District, which is
quite dense. Additionally, Planning staff felt smaller scale neighborhood commercial nodes in the CB zones
adjacent to residential areas could be negatively affected. It is Planning’s opinion that development
pressure in these areas could drive out the small businesses that contribute to a neighborhood’s character,
and help make them walkable with access to amenities and community spaces.
Examples of CB zoning districts include 9th & 9th, Glendale Drive near Navajo Circle, 300 West in the
Marmalade District, and Highland Drive near the border with Millcreek City.
Planning also recommended requiring primary entries are street facing for units adjacent to public streets.
In addition, Planning staff recommended requiring porches, exterior lighting, walkways leading to public
sidewalks for single-family attached residential developments within the commercial districts.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its February 14, 2024 meeting and held a public
hearing at which no one spoke. The Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council including Planning staff’s recommended changes. The
Commissioner who voted against the motion felt the proposed changes should apply only to the CG zoning
district.
Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports
moving forward with the proposal.
POLICY QUESTION
1. The Council may wish to ask the Administration if and how this text amendment would be
impacted by the proposed commercial and mixed-use zones consolidation.
2. The Council may wish to discuss whether to exclude Sugar House Business District and Community
Business zoning districts from the proposed text amendment.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As the term indicates, single-family attached dwellings are connected by one or both side walls, also
referred to as “party walls.” They are built in groups of three or more units. Each unit sits on its own lot
(known as “fee-simple” ownership) and often includes a yard and garage or parking area. Each unit may be
leased or sold individually, along with the land on which it sits. (There are some exceptions such as
community land trusts where the property on which the units within a development are owned by a single
entity. This helps make home ownership attainable to a larger group of people since only the structure is
owned by the property owner.)
While they are classified as multi-family dwellings, condominiums are not part of the proposed text
amendment. The following is for information purposes. Condominiums are classified as multi-family
dwellings by the Planning Division and have a central ownership or management structure. Individual
living spaces are sold or leased and the land on which they sit, and common spaces are generally
collectively owned by the condominium owners.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Planning staff identified two key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 8-9 of the Planning
Commission staff report, and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning staff
report.
Page | 4
Consideration 1 – Alignment with Adopted Plans and Policies
Planning staff found that the proposed amendment aligns with principles in Plan Salt Lake and Housing
SLC related to increasing housing options, including home ownership, throughout the city.
After reviewing the Neighborhoods, and Economy guiding principles initiatives within Plan Salt Lake,
Planning believes the proposal should be modified to exclude the Community Business, and Sugar House
Business Districts as discussed above.
Consideration 2 – Public Input
Planning staff received comments related to the proposed text amendment from several developers, along
with some residents and community councils. Developers’ comments were supportive of the proposal,
noting opportunities to expand housing types throughout the city. Resident and community council
comments noted the replacement of some neighborhood commercial nodes by multifamily developments
in recent years, and a concern that additional nodes could be affected in the future.
As discussed above, Planning noted the potential for new housing options in smaller commercial nodes
could increase development pressure resulting in the loss of neighborhood amenities. Again, Planning staff
and the Planning Commission recommend removing CB and CSHBD from the list of zoning districts to
potentially allow single-family attached dwellings.
ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS
Attachment D (pages 23-27) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning text amendment
standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are
summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information.
Factor Finding
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as
stated through its various adopted planning documents.
Complies if CB and
CSHBD districts
removed.
Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the
specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance.
Complies if CB and
CSHBD districts
removed.
Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with
the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay
zoning districts which may impose additional standards.
Complies provided
development conforms
with requirements of
overlays.
The extent to which a proposed text amendment
implements best current, professional practices of urban
planning and design.
Complies
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
• November 2, 2023 – Application received by Salt Lake City Planning Division.
• November 9, 2023 – Petition assigned to Cassie Younger, Senior Planner.
• November 15, 2023 – Early notification to all recognized community councils. 45-day comment
period begins.
Page | 5
• November 20, 2023 – Proposal posted for online open house.
• December 30, 2023 – 45-day recognized community organization notice period ends.
• February 1, 2024 –
o Agenda posted to Planning Commission website and State of Utah public notice webpage.
o Public hearing notice sign with project information and Planning Commission public
hearing notice posted at various libraries throughout the city.
• February 14, 2024 – Planning Commission briefing and public hearing. The Commission forwards
a positive recommendation to the City Council.
• March 1, 2024 – Planning Division requests ordinance from the City Attorney’s Office.
• April 6, 2024 – Ordinance from Attorney’s Office received by Planning Division.
• April 24, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office.
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
City Council –July 9, 2024
PLNPCM2023-00894
TEXT AMENDMENT REQUEST //
SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED IN
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Allow Single-Family Attached where Multifamily is already
permitted in the following zones:
General Commercial (CG)
Community Business (CB)
Commercial Corridor (CC)
Community Shopping (CS)
Sugar House Business Districts (CSHBD 1 & 2)
APPLICANT’S REQUEST
Salt Lake City //Planning Division
Map illustrates the location of the
affected zones proposed by the
applicant
LOCATION OF
COMMERCIAL ZONES
Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
MULTI-FAMILY
•Apartments
•Shared open space, parking
•Land centrally owned
SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED
•Townhouses
• Separate yards, parking
•Land Individually owned
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
TOWNHOUSE
CONDOS
SINGLE-FAMILY
ATTACHED
Central ownership of land
Individual ownership of units only
Individual lots
Ownership includes yards and land
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
ADD SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED
•General Commercial (CG)
•Commercial Corridor (CC)
•Community Shopping (CS)
•Add design standards for single-
family attached
KEEP AS IS (MULTIFAMILY ONLY)
•Community Business (CB)
•Sugar House Business District
(CSHBD 1 & 2)
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
COMMUNITY
BUSINESS DISTRICT
•Neighborhood-level commercial hubs
•Encroachment from residential
development
•Usually includes more-affordable
commercial spaces
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
•Regional Node
•Higher density and mix of use
encouraged
•SFA dwellings usually less dense with
lighter mix of uses (if at all)
SUGAR HOUSE
BUSINESS DISTRICT
Salt Lake City // Planning Division
•All permit broad variety of uses
•CC & CG cover greater land area
•CS has stricter review process
OTHER DISTRICTS
(CC, CG, CS)
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DESIGN STANDARDS
GROUND FLOOR ENTRY
•Applies to all ground-floor units
adjacent to public street
•Must have primary entry facing street
ENTRY FEATURES
•Required entries must have porch
•Permitted design only
•Walkway connected to public sidewalk
•Exterior lighting highlighting entries
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
The Planning Commission forwarded a positive
recommendation with the recommended modifications on
February 14, 2024.
RECOMMENDATION
Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning
Cassie Younger Aaron Barlow
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
________________________ Date Received: _________________
Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 04/22/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
__________________________
SUBJECT: PLNPCM2023-00894 Zoning Text Amendment to allow Single-Family Attached
Dwellings in select Commercial Zones
STAFF CONTACT: Cassie Younger, Senior Planner, cassie.younger@slcgov.com, 801-535-6211
Aaron Barlow, Principal Planner, aaron.barlow@slcgov.com, 802-535-6182
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follow the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve the proposed zoning text amendments as modified by staff.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Natalie Linchenko of TAG SLC submitted a petition to
allow Single-Family Attached Dwellings as a permitted use in commercial zones where
multifamily is already permitted. These districts include Community Business (CB), Community
Shopping (CS), Commercial Corridor (CC), General Commercial (CG), and Sugar House
Business Districts (CSHBD 1 & 2). Single-Family Attached Dwellings are typically referred to
as townhomes or row houses. The applicant stated this petition was initiated to increase housing
options and housing ownership in the city.
While Planning staff agreed with the notion of expanding housing options within the city, there
were concerns about how townhouse-style development (which is typically less dense in nature)
would affect the dense mixed-use character of Sugar House and the small-scale commercial
nodes found within the CB district. Therefore, staff recommended that Single-Family Attached
jill love (Apr 24, 2024 12:02 MDT)
jill love 04/24/2024
04/24/2024
Dwellings should not be added to the CB and CSHBD districts. The recommendation also
included additional design standards for attached single-family dwellings within the remaining
affected commercial districts. These design standards would require ground-floor residential
entries with specified porch features along street-facing façades. More information can be
found in the Staff Report, linked below.
Planning Commission Review and Recommendation:
On February 14, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the
proposed amendments as proposed by the applicant and staff. The Commission voted (6:1) to
recommend approval of the text amendment as recommended by staff.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
•The Planning Division provided a 45-day comment period notice to all recognized
Community Organizations on November 15, 2023. Staff presented the petition at the
Sugar House Community Council meeting.
•An online open house has been on the Planning Division’s website since November 20,
2023.
•Public noticing of the Planning Commission hearing was completed on February 1, 2024
•Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 14, 2024 and made a
recommendation that the City Council approve the text amendment as recommended by
staff.
Planning Commission (PC) Records (Click to Access):
a)PC Agenda of February 14, 2024
b)PC Minutes of February 14, 2024
c)Recording of February 14, 2024 PC Meeting (Starting at 1:00:07)
d)Planning Commission Staff Report of February 14, 2024
EXHIBITS:
1.Chronology
2.Notice of City Council Hearing
3.Applicant’s Materials
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
1
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. _____ of 2024
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code
to allow single-family attached dwellings in select commercial zoning districts)
An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant
to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00894 to allow single-family attached dwellings in select
commercial zoning districts.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a
public hearing on February 14, 2024 to consider a petition submitted by TAG SLC, LLC to
amend Title 21A to allow single-family attached dwellings in select commercial zoning districts;
and
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said
petition; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section
21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for
Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to the “Dwelling: Single-family
attached” use, and which shall appear as follows:
2
Use CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB
Single-
family
attached
P P P P
SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.P. That
Subsection 21A.37.050.P of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards Defined: Entry
Features) shall be and hereby is amended as follows:
P. Entry Features: Each required entrance per Section 21A.37.050.D and 21A.37.050.L of
this title shall include a permitted entry feature with a walkway connected to a public sidewalk
and exterior lighting that highlights the entryway(s). Where buildings are located on a corner lot,
only one street facing façade must include an entry feature. Where a building does not have
direct public street frontage, the entry feature should be applied to the façade where the primary
entrance is determined to be located. A two-family dwelling arranged side by side, row house
and cottage court developments shall include at least one entry feature per dwelling unit adjacent
to a public street.
[Note to codifier: no changes to Subsections 21A.37.050.P.1 and 2, and all subsections thereto.]
SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.060.B. That the
table in Subsection 21A.37.060.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards Required in
Each Zoning District: Commercial Districts) shall be amended (1) as to the “Ground floor residential
entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L)” standard, (2) a new row for
“Entry features (21A.37.050.P)” standard to be inserted after the row “Primary entrance design SNB
District (21A.37.050.O)”, and (3) a new table Note number 3 inserted after Note 2, all of which shall
appear as follows:
3
Standard
(Code Section)
District
SNB CN CB CS CC CSHBD CG1 TSA
Ground floor
residential
entrances for
dwellings with
individual unit
entries
(21A.37.050.L)
X3 X3 X3 X
Entry features
(21A.37.050P)
X3 X3 X3
3. These standards only apply to single-family attached dwellings in this district.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its
first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024.
______________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________.
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed.
______________________________
MAYOR
4
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. ________ of 2024.
Published: ______________.
Ordinance allowing single family attached
in certain commercial zones (final)v1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date:___________________________
By: ____________________________
Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney
April 6, 2024
1
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1
No. _____ of 2024 2
3
(An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code 4
to allow single-family attached dwellings in select commercial zoning districts) 5
6
An ordinance amending various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pursuant 7
to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00894 to allow single-family attached dwellings in select 8
commercial zoning districts. 9
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a 10
public hearing on February 14, 2024 to consider a petition submitted by TAG SLC, LLC to 11
amend Title 21A to allow single-family attached dwellings in select commercial zoning districts; 12
and13
WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2024 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor 14
of transmitting a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said 15
petition; and 16
WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that 17
adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. 18
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 19
SECTION 1. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.33.030. That Section 20
21A.33.030 of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for 21
Commercial Districts) shall be and hereby is amended only as to the “Dwelling: Single-family 22
attached” use, and which shall appear as follows: 23
24
2
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Use CN CB CS1 CC CSHBD1 CG SNB
Single-
family
attached
P P P P
25
SECTION 2. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.050.P. That 26
Subsection 21A.37.050.P of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards Defined: Entry 27
Features) shall be and hereby is amended as follows: 28
P. Entry Features: Each required entrance per Section 21A.37.050.D and 21A.37.050.L of 29
this title shall include a permitted entry feature with a walkway connected to a public sidewalk 30
and exterior lighting that highlights the entryway(s). Where buildings are located on a corner lot, 31
only one street facing façade must include an entry feature. Where a building does not have 32
direct public street frontage, the entry feature should be applied to the façade where the primary 33
entrance is determined to be located. A two-family dwelling arranged side by side, row house 34
and cottage court developments shall include at least one entry feature per dwelling unit adjacent 35
to a public street. 36
37
[Note to codifier: no changes to Subsections 21A.37.050.P.1 and 2, and all subsections thereto.] 38
39
SECTION 3. Amending the text of Salt Lake City Code Subsection 21A.37.060.B. That the 40
table in Subsection 21A.37.060.B of the Salt Lake City Code (Zoning: Design Standards Required in 41
Each Zoning District: Commercial Districts) shall be amended (1) as to the “Ground floor residential 42
entrances for dwellings with individual unit entries (21A.37.050.L)” standard, (2) a new row for 43
“Entry features (21A.37.050.P)” standard to be inserted after the row “Primary entrance design SNB 44
District (21A.37.050.O)”, and (3) a new table Note number 3 inserted after Note 2, all of which shall 45
appear as follows: 46
Standard
(Code Section)
District
SNB CN CB CS CC CSHBD CG1 TSA
3
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
Ground floor
residential
entrances for
dwellings with
individual unit
entries
(21A.37.050.L)
X3 X3 X3 X
Entry features
(21A.37.050P)
X3 X3 X3
47
3. These standards only apply to single-family attached dwellings in this district. 48
49
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its 50
first publication. 51
52
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2024. 53
54
55
______________________________ 56
CHAIRPERSON 57
58
ATTEST: 59
60
______________________________ 61
CITY RECORDER 62
63
64
Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. 65
66
67
Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 68
69
70
______________________________ 71
MAYOR 72
73
______________________________ 74
CITY RECORDER 75
76
4
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
(SEAL) 77
78
Bill No. ________ of 2024. 79
Published: ______________. 80
Ordinance allowing single family attached 81
in certain commercial zones (legislative)v1 82
1)CHRONOLOGY
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2023-00894
November 2, 2023 Application for a Zoning Map Amendment was received.
November 9, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00894 was assigned to Cassie
Younger, Senior Planner, for staff analysis and processing.
November 15, 2023 Notice was sent to all Recognized Community
Organizations informing them of the petition.
November 20, 2023 The proposal was posted for an online open house.
The proposal can still be viewed online.
December 30, 2023 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized
Organizations ended.
February 1, 2024 Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and
the State of Utah Public Notice webpage.
Public hearing notice sign with project information and
notice of the Planning Commission public hearing posted at
various libraries throughout the city.
February 9, 2024 Planning Commission Staff Report was posted.
February 14, 2024 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a
recommendation to the City Council to approve the
proposed text amendment as recommended by Staff.
March 1, 2024 Staff sent a request to the Attorney's office for ordinance
April 6, 2024 Ordinance received from Attorney’s office
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
4 Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
2)NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00894 Zoning
Amendment to allow Single-Family Attached Dwellings in select Commercial Zones
where multifamily dwellings are already permitted. These districts include Community
Business (CB), Community Shopping (CS), Commercial Corridor (CC), General
Commercial (CG), and Sugar House Business Districts (CSHBD 1 & 2).
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive
comments regarding the petitions. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City
Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may
consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be
held:
DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the
City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake
City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may
also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending
an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any
source are shared with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call
Aaron Barlow at 801-535-6282 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, or via e-mail at aaron.barlow@slcgov.com
The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting
the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00894
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may
include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make
requests at least two make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711.
3)APPLICANT’S MATERIALS
Applicant's original petition 11/9/23
Text Amendment Proposal
for Single-Family Attached Housing to be permitted wherever Multi-Family is permitted
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to submit a proposal for a text amendment in the Salt Lake City zoning code. This
amendment aims to enhance housing ownership opportunities within Salt Lake City by allowing
single-family attached housing developments wherever multi-family is permitted.
I.Purpose:
The primary aim of this text amendment is to modify the existing zoning regulations, allowing for the
development of single-family attached housing anywhere that multi-family is permitted. In zoning
areas where single-family attached housing is prohibited while multi-family housing is permitted,
many projects that resemble townhomes are designated as condos for legal classification. This
classification as condos allows the projects to be considered a multi-family development rather than
single-family attached housing. The key issue at hand is that when a project is designated as a condo
rather than an attached single-family residence, it is much more likely it will be rented rather than
sold to individual families.
But why do investors often steer clear of selling condos? The answer lies in the significant liability
risks tied to condo sales. The intricate nature of condominium development, involving individual unit
sales within a shared property, can amplify the potential for legal disputes and financial liabilities.
Additionally, ownership percentage requirements create challenges in individually selling off the
project. Consequently, even if some developers are willing to take on the extra risks associated with
selling individual condo units, most architects, builders, and other stakeholders tend to shy away from
such projects.
This zoning text amendment is a direct response to concerns within our own firm and those voiced by
the developers, architects, and industry professionals we engage with regularly. This amendment is
not tied to a specific project but rather seeks to address a systemic issue. The current zoning
regulations inadvertently favor rental housing over homeownership by creating unnecessary hurdles
in producing more for sale units.
II.Zoning Ordinance to Be Changed:
The proposed text amendment would affect 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL
USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS.
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
III. Factors for City Council Consideration: This text amendment aligns with Salt Lake City's broader
objective of bolstering homeownership opportunities, fostering sustainable growth, and broadening
the availability of for-sale housing options.
Consistency with City Planning Documents: The amendment aligns with Salt Lake City's adopted
planning documents, particularly Growing SLC and Housing SLC, which emphasize increasing
homeownership opportunities and addressing the challenges of housing affordability.
In Housing SLC, the third goal is clearly outlined as "Enhancing opportunities for homeownership and
other avenues for wealth and equity development."
1 Additionally, in Growing SLC, Goal 2, Objective 6
explicitly emphasizes the need to "Expand opportunities for home ownership."
2
Community Support: The proposal
supports the community's desire for
increased opportunities for
homeownership. Within Housing SLC,
the most recent Salt Lake City Plan,
survey participants consistently ranked
homeownership among their top three
priorities, underscoring the significance
of this goal for both individual residents
and their communities.
3
3 Salt Lake City Documents, Accessed October 24, 2023
www.slcdocs.com/CAN/2023-Housing-SLC-Plan-Spread-1.pdf
2 Salt Lake City Documents, Accessed October 24, 2023
www.slcdocs.com/hand/Growing_SLC_Final_No_Attachments.pdf
1 Salt Lake City Documents, Accessed October 24, 2023
www.slcdocs.com/CAN/2023-Housing-SLC-Plan-Spread-1.pdf
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
IV.Conclusion:
This text amendment proposal seeks to enhance housing opportunities in Salt Lake City by allowing
single-family attached housing wherever multi-family is permitted, promoting sustainable growth and
making homeownership more accessible to its residents. We believe this change aligns with the city's
goals, and we appreciate your consideration of this important amendment.
Should you require any additional information or wish to discuss this proposal further, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
All the best,
Natalia Linchenko
Natalia@tagslc.com
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
P Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
Applicant's updated petition 11/15/23
Text Amendment Proposal
for Single-Family Attached Housing to be permitted wherever Multi-Family is permitted within
the Commercial District
To whom it may concern,
I am submitting a proposal for a text amendment to the Salt Lake City zoning code, aiming to increase
housing ownership opportunities by permitting single-family attached housing in commercial
districts (CB, CS, CC, CSHBD, and CG) where multi-family is currently allowed.
I.Purpose:
This text amendment primarily seeks to revise existing zoning regulations, aiming to eliminate
unnecessary obstacles in producing for sale homes. In zoning areas where single-family attached
housing is prohibited while multi-family housing is permitted, many projects that resemble
townhomes are designated as condos for legal classification. This classification as condos allows the
projects to be considered a multi-family development rather than single-family attached housing. The
key issue at hand is that when a project is designated as a condo rather than an attached single-family
residence, it is much more likely it will be rented rather than sold to individual families.
But why do investors often steer clear of selling condos? The answer lies in the significant liability
risks tied to condo sales. The intricate nature of condominium development, involving individual unit
sales within a shared property, can amplify the potential for legal disputes and financial liabilities.
Additionally, ownership percentage requirements create challenges in individually selling off the
project. Consequently, even if some developers are willing to take on the extra risks associated with
selling individual condo units, most architects, builders, and other stakeholders tend to shy away from
such projects.
This zoning text amendment is a direct response to concerns within our own firm and those voiced by
the developers, architects, and industry professionals we engage with regularly. This amendment is
not tied to a specific project but rather seeks to address a systemic issue. The current zoning
regulations inadvertently favor rental housing over homeownership by creating unnecessary hurdles
in producing more for sale units.
II.Zoning Ordinance to Be Changed:
The proposed text amendment would affect 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL
USES FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS.
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
11
III. Factors for City Council Consideration: This text amendment aligns with Salt Lake City's broader
objective of bolstering homeownership opportunities, fostering sustainable growth, and broadening
the availability of for-sale housing options.
Consistency with City Planning Documents: The amendment aligns with Salt Lake City's adopted
planning documents, particularly Growing SLC and Housing SLC, which emphasize increasing
homeownership opportunities and addressing the challenges of housing affordability.
In Housing SLC, the third goal is clearly outlined as "Enhancing opportunities for homeownership and
other avenues for wealth and equity development."
1 Additionally, in Growing SLC, Goal 2, Objective 6
explicitly emphasizes the need to "Expand opportunities for home ownership."
2
Community Support: The proposal
supports the community's desire for
increased opportunities for
homeownership. Within Housing SLC,
the most recent Salt Lake City Plan,
survey participants consistently ranked
homeownership among their top three
priorities, underscoring the significance
of this goal for both individual residents
and their communities.
3
3 Salt Lake City Documents, Accessed October 24, 2023
www.slcdocs.com/CAN/2023-Housing-SLC-Plan-Spread-1.pdf
2 Salt Lake City Documents, Accessed October 24, 2023
www.slcdocs.com/hand/Growing_SLC_Final_No_Attachments.pdf
1 Salt Lake City Documents, Accessed October 24, 2023
www.slcdocs.com/CAN/2023-Housing-SLC-Plan-Spread-1.pdf
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
12
IV.Conclusion:
This text amendment proposal seeks to enhance housing opportunities within Salt Lake City’s
Commercial Zoning District by allowing single-family attached housing wherever multi-family is
permitted, promoting sustainable growth and making homeownership more accessible to its
residents. We believe this change aligns with the city's goals, and we appreciate your consideration of
this important amendment.
Should you require any additional information or wish to discuss this proposal further, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
All the best,
Natalia Linchenko
Natalia@tagslc.com
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
13 Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments.
From:TAG SLC
To:TAG SLC; Younger, Cassie; Barlow, Aaron; Natalia Linchenko
Subject:(EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2023-00894 - possible changes to application
Date:Wednesday, December 20, 2023 9:58:45 AM
Attachments:image001.png
Cassie, Aaron and the Salt Lake Planners-
We have had several conversations about the potential recommendations you sent over last week. Ultimately, we want to
be a good partner to city with the goal of this application to make it easier to construct for sale housing throughout our
community.
Eliminate CB Zone from the applications:
We would like CB to remain as part of our application.
I totally understand the desire to foster these community nodes and the challenges removing neighborhood commercial
from neighborhoods. An overhaul of the zone is great as zoning leads to the development outcomes. Given the potential
lag in the adoption of any new ordinance we think its best to propose allowing SFA in this zone since multy family is at
this time allowed.
If the city and city council decides to modify the zone in the future, then SFA could be eliminated alongside multi family.
CSHBD-
We love density. The CSHBD 1 zone is unlikely to be conducive for SFA.
CSHBD 2 is a more likly place to see SFA since its only allowed to go to 60 ft but still not likly given the land values in this
district.
We arent advocating to build SFA here, we are advocating to remove zoning barriers to producing owner occupied
housing. I'm sure we could find some lots in this zone that SFA would be a good outcome, even in a zone that should be
denser.
Adding additional design guidelines:
Frankly, this is beyond the scope of our application. Our intent was to propose a simple modification to allow SFA into zones
where multi family is already allowed. Although I do think design standards are positive I think its more than this petition
can handle.
Also, it doesnt seem fair that units designed for ownership have a higher bar for design than doing a for rent project. I
would actually argue the opposite, if the city's intent is to promote more owner occupied units.
We understand your points and hope that you understand ours as well.
At this time we ask that our application remain the same.
Thanks
Jordan Atkin
PLNPCM2023-00894 Single-family
Attached Dwellings in Commercial Districts
Administrative Transmittal
Planning Division
14
Item E2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project-specific Allocations Budget
Staff Note: The Council previously approved holding a CIP public hearing on July 9 and August 13
which have been publicly advertised. The Council is tentatively scheduled to continue discussing CIP
project-specific funding at the August 13 meeting.
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council close the public hearing and hold another public hearing on August 13.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY25CIP
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke, Senior Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE:FY2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
CIP BUDGET BOOK PAGES:
-5-13 shows a summary table of proposed projects
and funding sources
-14-15 lists projects not recommended for funding
-19-23 identifies existing bonds paid from CIP (does not include General Obligation bonds) and
other ongoing obligations
-27-61 has project specific pages for the recommended General Fund CIP projects
-65-124 has project specific pages for enterprise fund capital projects (Airport, Golf, Public Utilities, and RDA)
NEW INFORMATION
At the July 2 briefing, the Council discussed the possible recapture of $1,887,153 from completed projects and a
cancelled project. The funds could be used for new CIP projects and/or added to the Cost Overrun Account. The
Council also requested two larger policy discussions with the Administration at a future date. First is about the
Cost Overrun process, amounts, and percentages as shown in Resolution 29 of 2017 section 11 (See Attachment
1). Second is all funding and programs for sidewalks which likely includes the Public Services, Community &
Neighborhoods, and Public Utilities Departments, and the deliberations could result in changes to City Code
such as the 50/50 cost share program. The Council also asked what resources would be needed to provide
ongoing regular publicly available status updates for CIP projects. Council staff will coordinate with the
Administration on next steps for these policy topics.
The Council began reviewing the funding log (Attachment 2) which was updated to be formatted for printing.
Note that the projects are listed from high to low scores by the CDCIP resident advisory board. The Council is
scheduled to continue reviewing the funding log at the July 9 work session in the afternoon. The first of two
public hearings is scheduled for the July 9 formal meeting in the evening.
Projects of Council Member Interest for Potential Additional Funding
Listed below are projects identified by Council Members as potential priorities for funding. This list is a
snapshot based on the July 2 briefing and will likely change based on future briefings.
- Project #4 Complete Streets Reconstruction requested $4.5 Million and the Board recommended $3.5
Million and the Mayor recommended full funding.
o Council Members Young and Dugan identified this project as a high priority if additional
funding is available such as the potential recapture of $1 million from completed projects. They
emphasized that local residential streets have not seen as much improvement compared to
major arterial streets in recent years. Part of this is a result of the policy decision to split the $87
million voter-approved Streets Reconstruction Bond 80% to major streets and 20% to local
Project Timeline:
Budget Hearings: May 21 & June 4, 2024
1st Briefing: June 6, 2024
2nd Briefing: July 2, 2024
3rd Briefing & Public Hearing: July 9, 2024
4th Briefing & Public Hearing: August 13, 2024
Potential Adoption Vote: August 20, 2024
Note: The Council approves debt service and overall
CIP funding in June with the annual budget. Project
specific funding is approved later by September 1.
Page | 2
streets. The Council could identify local residential streets as the priority for some or all funding
to reconstruct streets this CIP cycle.
- Project #6 Complete Streets Overlay requested $3.5 Million and Board recommended $2.75 Million and
Mayor recommended fully funding.
o Like Project #4 above, Council Members Young and Dugan identified this project as a high
priority if additional funding is available. The Council could identify local residential streets as
the priority for some or all funding to reconstruct streets this CIP cycle. It’s important to note
that many of the streets in worst condition are local residential streets where the pavement is in
serious or failing condition. An asphalt overlay is not an option once pavement has deteriorated
to a serious or failed condition so a full reconstruction is needed in those cases.
- Project #11 Safer Crossings Citywide requested $600,000 and is recommended for $300,000 from the
Board and the Mayor.
o Council Members Dugan and Lopez Chavez identified this project for potential additional
funding and asked how far the recommended funding level could go. A HAWK signal at a single
location would cost more than the recommended funding level and require using another
funding source to be completed such as the Cost Overrun Account or paired with a Livable
Streets traffic calming project. The recommended funding level would be enough for a few
smaller safety improvements such as flashing crosswalk signs, colored / stamped concrete,
raised crosswalk, and pedestrian refuge islands.
o Council Member Lopez Chavez has heard safety concerns from constituents about the
intersection of 700 South and 900 East which could use these funds for smaller safety
improvements as well as intersections along 500 South between 700 East and 900 East.
- Project #12 Sugar House Park Pavilion Replacement(s) requested $960,000 and is recommended for
$480,000 by the Board and the Mayor.
o Council Members Mano and Young commented that funding two pavilions at the request
funding level might have some savings and efficiencies compared to funding one pavilion at a
time. They also expressed support to fully fund this project given that the County has budgeted
matching funds of $960,000 and would reduce that budget to match a lower City project-
specific funding level. The pavilion replacements have an equal cost share split 50/50 between
the City and County. If this project was fully funded, then four pavilion replacements would
remain at Sugar House Park and would return for funding in future CIP cycles.
- Project #13 Transition to Regionally Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting Irrigation Systems, and
Reducing Water Use requested $3.25 Million and is recommended for $500,000 by both the Board and
the Mayor.
o Some Council Members asked for a prioritization of projects that could use these funds. The
Public Lands Department provided the below list the highest need areas based on irrigation
system conditions:
▪1200 East islands (South Temple to 400 South): Irrigation upgrades
▪700 East islands (900 South to 1300 South, UDOT owned and SLC maintained):
Irrigation upgrades
▪1300 East medians/islands and park strips (Parkway Avenue to Claybourne Avenue):
Irrigation upgrades
▪Allen Park: Full irrigation system improvements to supplement GO Bond funding and
provide cost efficiency with concurrent implementation and in concert with the
recommendations from the 2024 Adaptive Reuse and Management Plan
▪Roots Disc Golf/Jordan River Par 3: New irrigation and root watering systems
specifically for trees
o Some Council Members commented in recent discussions the need for capital maintenance
improvements and water conservation specifically for medians and islands. The Public Lands
Department identified five high need irrigation system replacement locations on islands as
shown below. Note that these five are after the three medians / islands (1200 East, 700 East,
and 1300 East) listed in the top priorities list above. The Department also noted that water costs
are the second highest operating expense after personnel costs, and medians are one of the
largest opportunities to reduce water use by upgrading irrigation systems to water trees
separately from ornamental grasses.
▪200 West islands (north of North Temple)
Page | 3
▪200 South islands (east of 900 East)
▪600 East Islands (South Temple to 900 South)
▪Parleys Way islands
▪800 West islands (300 North to ~150 South, 600 South to 900 South)
- Project #19 Traffic Signal Replacements and Upgrades requested $2.7 Million and the Board
recommended $730,000 and the Mayor recommended $860,000.
o Council Members Mano, Young, and Dugan flagged this project for potential additional funding
to ensure a minimum of two traffic signal replacements could be funded. Recent traffic signal
projects estimated the cost at $450,000 for an intersection so at least $900,000 would likely be
needed for two intersections, and the Cost Overrun Account could contribute some additional
funding if needed.
o Council Member Lopez Chavez emphasized that upgrading signals for cyclists and pedestrians is
a safety need in addition to replacing older signals.
- Project #20 Memory Grove Park Repairs and Preservation & Maintenance Plan requested $1.91 Million
and was not recommended for funding by Board but recommended for full funding by the Mayor.
o Multiple Council Members requested a detailed cost breakout of the individual projects,
prioritization of the projects, and what, if any, obligations the City has as stewards of the war
memorials and monuments in the park.
o Upon review, the Public Lands Department “does not believe that there are any agreements in
place that legally bind the City nor any partners to ongoing maintenance of the monuments and
memorials in the park. We will continue to investigate within our department and with our
partners to determine if there are any that we have missed. Though informal, several groups do
help or have helped with regular cleanups and small projects in the park (typically in-kind, but
sometime monetarily), including the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Preservation Utah, the Beta
Sigma Phi International Sorority, and the Friends of Memory Grove (which is organized through
the Greater Avenues Community Council).”
o One of the nine sub-projects would directly improve a monument in the park. The proposed
preservation and maintenance plan would recommend detailed improvements, repairs, and cost
estimates for the other monuments in the park. The nine sub-projects and associated costs are
listed below:
▪Meditation Stairs stone repairs ($119,700)
▪Repointing the 8-pillar monument (pagoda) ($79,900)
▪Repairing front entrance gate concrete pillars ($81,250)
▪Replacing the westside entryway planter ($8,200)
▪Cleaning and recoating the fountain to preserve concrete ($27,000)
▪Redo the Canyon Road sidewalk within the park so that it is historically correct (as the
stones are currently placed in concrete instead of mortar) ($98,000)
▪Podium repairs ($11,100)
▪Remove and replace concrete lighting ($31,000) (more could be appropriated to this
task in order to fully replace all concrete lighting in Memory Grove and City Creek
Parks, as well as along Canyon Road – note this is one of the most urgent projects
▪Replace the asphalt path with a concrete path on the west hillside, near the Capitol
Building ($602,500) – note this is one of the most urgent projects
▪Soft costs for the above nine projects estimated at $691,350 for contingency, permits,
design costs, and inflation over two years. These represent 40% of the total $1.75
Million cost.
- Project #29 Jordan River Trail Food Forest + Og Woi Partner Garden requested $385,000 but did not
receive a funding recommendation from the Board or the Mayor.
o Council Members Petro and Wharton identified this as a project of interest. The two projects
could be funded separately, which slightly increases the total cost. The Food Forest creation is
estimated to cost $280,000 and formalizing and bringing up to standards the Og-Woi
community garden is estimated to cost $120,000. There is uncertainty about potential
environmental contamination and impacts to the cost and project feasibility at these funding
levels. The Administration reports that given these concerns, a conservative approach would be
to fund the project with General Fund dollars and then after construction in a midyear budget
amendment using park impact fees to reimburse the General Fund.
Page | 4
- Project #41 California Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvements Construction requested $807,000 and
did not receive a funding recommendation from the Board or the Mayor.
o Council Member Puy expressed interest to staff about recapturing the $875,000 from the
cancelled corridor connection project at the Sorenson Center Campus and using some of those
funds to fully fund project #41. He mentioned this traffic calming project is a few blocks down
California Ave from the Sorenson Center Campus and would benefit many of the same students
and families using the Center’s facilities as well as those attending the adjacent Glendale Middle
School and Mountain View Elementary School. Council Member Young expressed support for
this approach.
- Project #48 Fayette Avenue Improvements between Washington Street & 200 West requested $560,000
but did not receive a funding recommendation from the Board or the Mayor.
o Council Members Mano, Lopez Chavez, and Puy identified this project for potential funding and
requested phasing options for smaller projects. One option is to split the project into a design
phase estimated to cost $80,000 and then a second phase funding construction at
approximately $480,000 in a future CIP cycle. The CIP project funding could be used as a local
match for state grant applications that the constituent has expressed an interest in pursuing.
Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings
At the July 2 and July 9 briefings, the Council may wish to identify any priority projects that do not have funding
recommendations or where additional funding is proposed, and any project-specific questions. Responsive
information and funding options would be gathered so the Council could balance the CIP project-specific
budgets on August 13 or 20. As part of the annual budget adoption vote on June 11, the Council made three
changes to the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for FY2025 CIP:
- Increased the transfer by an additional $250,000 from the General Fund to the CIP Fund which
are the most flexible dollars available for any CIP project.
- Added $2 million for project #23 the Livable Streets traffic calming program from the
quarter cent sales tax for transportation fund balance (separate from General Fund Balance) which
neither the resident advisory board nor the Mayor recommended to fund. The Council discussed a desire
to prioritize this program for funding over the next several years to reach all of the higher need
neighborhoods and a longer-term goal of implementing traffic calming in all residential neighborhoods.
The Council may wish to request that the Administration include stable ongoing funding for Livable
Streets traffic calming as a high priority in developing a five-year Capital Asset Plan.
- Added $3 million for public utility upgrades underneath 2100 South during the street
reconstruction between 700 East and 1100 East from Funding Our Future Fund Balance in addition to
the $7 million approved in Budget Amendment #5 of FY2024. The City anticipates reimbursement in
the future by requiring connection agreements of adjacent property owners as they seek to tie into the
upgraded utility lines. The resulting connection fee is proportional to each property’s front footage per
City Code. The connection fee obligation is also recorded against the adjacent properties so current and
future owners are notified of it.
Recapture $1 Million from Completed Projects
The Administration confirmed there is $1,012,153 of general fund dollars remaining and could be recaptured
from CIP projects that were constructed and fully closed out. Per the Council’s CIP policies section 12 (see
Attachment 1), these funds could be made available as additional funding to the Cost Overrun Account in
FY2025. It has a current balance of $937,232 and is proposed to receive an additional $223,171 in FY2025 CIP
for a new balance of $1,160,403. The Council could recapture some or all of the $1,012,153 from completed
projects or designate some of it for the Cost Overrun Account. The Administration reports this account has lower
utilization in recent years because the formula in CIP policy section 11 (see Attachment 1) has dollar limits that
have lost significant purchasing power since originally set in 2004. This means that the Cost Overrun Account
does not fill project funding gaps as much as before. The Council could request that the Administration review
and recommend adjustments to the Cost Overrun Account formula including the dollar and percentage limits.
Page | 5
Recapture $875,000 from a Cancelled Project: Connecting Corridor for Sorenson Multicultural
Center and Unity Center Funded Five Years Ago
The Council fully funded the proposed connecting corridor project to link the two community center buildings
on the Sorenson Campus five years ago. The Administration has confirmed that the project is cancelled. Per the
Council’s CIP policies (see Attachment 1), unfinished projects older than three years should be reviewed for
funding recapture. The $875,000 are General Fund dollars which are the most flexible of the CIP funding
sources and available to go to any project.
Aging Reports and Status Updates for CIP Projects
The Council may wish to ask for a list of projects that are older than 2 years, and any notes about the status of
the project, obstacles, and anticipated completion dates.
Updated CIP Debt Load Projections Chart through FY2028
The Finance Department provided the below updated chart of projected debt load on the CIP Fund through
FY2028. This updated version from the one in the Additional Info Section reflects a 9% goal for the annual
transfer from the General Fund to CIP instead of the historical 7% trend. It also includes larger ongoing projects
funding outside of the competitive CIP process such as new urban trail capital maintenance, new planning and
design funding, expanded public lands capital maintenance, and expanded vacant and leased city owned
property maintenance.
Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
Each year, the Council appropriates overall funding available for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and
approves debt payments and ongoing obligations as part of the annual budget in June. Over the summer, the
Council reviews individual projects and per state law must approve project specific funding by September 1. CIP
is an open and competitive process where residents, local organizations, and City departments submit project
applications. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) resident advisory board
reviews the applications in public meetings and makes funding recommendations to the Mayor and Council. The
Mayor provides a second set of funding recommendations which this year includes using $15 million from a
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026 -27 FY 2027 -28
Allocation of CIP General Fund Transfer Amount, 6 Year Projection, assuming 2%
revenue growth per year, and continued allocation of 9% of GF revenue to CIP
Debt Service On Bonds Other Debt Service Other Commitments Pay as You Go Projects
Page | 6
capital maintenance holding account that was created after the CDCIP Board completed their deliberations. The
Council considers both sets of funding recommendations and ultimately decides project specific funding.
Funding for capital improvements sometimes occurs in midyear budget amendments but the annual CIP process
is the Council’s largest annual opportunity to fund large public construction projects. This report provides an
overview of the proposed General Fund CIP budget for FY2025, projects of Council Member interest not
recommended for funding, policy questions, and further details in the Additional Info section and attachments.
Overview of the FY2025 CIP Proposed Budget
The total FY2025 CIP budget is $43.1 million. However, this increases to $58.1 million when including the $15
million capital maintenance holding account that the Council created in FY2024 Budget Amendment #5 and is
being added to the summer CIP deliberations. This is $17.5 million (43%) more than last year. The FY2024 CIP
budget was closer to the City’s typical funding levels in recent years. FY2023 was a record year for CIP with
nearly $47 million total funding plus the $67.5 Million Sales Tax Revenue Bond and voters approved $85 million
for Parks, Trails, and Open Space General Obligation Bonds. The Council approved spending the first $24.6
million issuance of that Parks Bond in October 2023.
The combined $25.2 million from the General Fund + Funding Our Future transfer to CIP (first and third rows
in the table below) is 6.8% of ongoing revenues which is slightly below the 7% seen in most budget years. On
May 7, in Budget Amendment #5 of FY2024, the Council appropriated $15 million to a CIP holding account for
capital maintenance projects. Taken together, the $40.2 million from the General Fund ($15 million plus the
$25.2 million) would be equivalent to a 10.8% of ongoing General Fund revenues transfer to CIP which is the
largest percentage for many years. Previous plans identified 7% as a recommended minimum level of investment
and a goal of 9%. The City did reach the 9% funding level in FY2023, although several departments have noted
difficulty with getting projects constructed due to staffing constraints, continued supply chain challenges, and
construction inflation.
A funding log summarizing the CDCIP resident advisory board and mayoral funding recommendations
including the $15 million for capital maintenance is available as Attachment 2. Note that the funding log is not
formatted for printing and is best viewed on an electronic device with a large screen. Updated funding logs
formatted for printing will be available for the July and August deliberations. The table below details funding
sources for CIP by fiscal year. See Attachment 5 for an overview of the major CIP Funding Sources. Other
highlights include:
Comparison of CIP Funding Sources by Fiscal Year
Page | 7
$9.3 Million Unrestricted General Funds – $9,370,549 of the ongoing transfer from the General Fund are
unrestricted funds available for any new projects (the most flexible funding available). This is calculated by
removing the debt service payments on existing bonds and rental payments for properties the City leases long-
term. The Council has restricted Funding Our Future to five critical need areas which is not part of this amount.
$855,950 Increase using Impact Fees – The amount of impact fees in the proposed CIP budget is
$3,824,800 which is entirely parks impact fees. There are over $24.2 million of impact fees available to spend
across the four types: fire, parks, police, and transportation. Most of the available funds are for parks. See the
Additional Info section for details.
$500,000 Increase using County 1/4¢ Sales Tax for Transportation – This became a new funding
source four years ago and is available to transportation projects per state law. As seen in other sales tax revenue
line items, this one has experienced significant growth in recent years. The City has conservatively budgeted for
new sales tax line items until a few years of actual revenues is available on which to base future projects. As a
result, the Quarter-cent Sales Tax for Transportation Fund Balance is estimated to have $6 million available in
addition to the $8.2 million in the FY2025 CIP proposed budget. The Council took a straw pool on June 4 during
the unresolved issues briefing to use $2 million of that Fund Balance for the Livable Streets traffic calming
Program which neither the CDCIP resident advisory board nor the Mayor recommended funding in FY2025.
$750,000 Increase using Class C (gas tax) – The City’s annual CIP budget for Class C funding has been
relatively flat at $3 million - $3.5 million for many years. This year, an additional $750,000 was identified in the
cash reserves / fund balance when incoming revenues exceeded the budget. The Finance Department is
conducting a reconciliation to determine whether additional funds could be available.
$12 Million Debt and Lease Payments – $11,985,204 (48%) of the ongoing General Fund transfer to CIP
(including Funding Our Future dollars) is needed to cover debt and rental payments. This calculation does not
include the $15 million from the capital maintenance holding account because those are one-time dollars from
the General Fund balance.
$ Change % Change
General Fund 15,126,884$ 25,231,431$ 21,189,461$ 21,355,753$ 166,292$ 1%
Capital Maintenance
Holding Account -$ -$ -$ 15,000,000$ 15,000,000$ ONE-TIME
Funding Our Future*3,580,000$ 5,100,000$ 4,271,001$ 3,837,642$ (433,359)$ -10%
Class C 3,021,706$ 3,000,000$ 3,500,000$ 4,250,000$ 750,000$ 21%
Impact Fees**8,276,103$ 4,159,755$ 2,968,850$ 3,824,800$ 855,950$ 29%
CDBG 322,000$ 722,000$ -$ -$ -$ ONE-TIME
Repurpose Old CIP
Accounts***252,271$ 152,660$ 614,689$ PENDING -ONE-TIME
County 1/4¢ Sales Tax 4,900,000$ 8,000,000$ 7,700,000$ 8,200,000$ 500,000$ 6%
Surplus Land Fund 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ ONE-TIME
Smith's Naming Rights
Revenue 154,000$ 154,000$ 150,000$ -$ (150,000)$ -100%
Landfill Revolving Fund -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ ONE-TIME
SLC Sports Complex ESCO 148,505$ 148,505$ 150,500$ 155,300$ 4,800$ 3%
Memorial House Rent
Revenue 68,554$ 68,554$ 50,000$ 20,000$ (30,000)$ -60%
TOTAL 36,027,131$ 46,736,905$40,594,501$ 58,143,495$ 17,548,994$ 43%
TOTAL without
ONE-TIME 35,252,860$45,862,245$39,979,812$ 41,643,495$ 1,663,683$ 4%
**Th ere are four impact fee types: fire, parks, police and streets
***Includes recaptured funds from multiple funding sources
Note: There's a $22,892 debt service rescope reduction not separated out in th e table above for FY2022
CIP Funding Sources Adopted
2021-22
Adopted
2023-24
Proposed
2024-25
FY2024 to FY2025
*Includes % to CIP "off th e top" available to any project, and funding for transit, and public righ t of way
infrastructure. Also, funding source is ongoing but Council could change th e use categories in th e future
Adopted
2022-23
Page | 8
Recapture Funds from Completed Projects and Unfinished Projects Older than Three Years
(Attachment 6 – Review by Departments was pending at time of publishing this staff report)
The CIP and Debt Management Resolution (Attachment 1) states that remaining funds should be considered for
recapture from completed projects and unfinished projects that are older than three years unless there has been
significant progress. The table in Attachment 6 is the staff’s attempt to follow up on the Council’s policy
guidance for CIP projects. Most of the 128 projects received General Fund dollars or impact fees. Some of this
funding could be recaptured by the Council as one-time revenue for General Fund uses, however, the other
sources like Class C, CDBG, impact fees, and donations have uses limited by law. A response and potential
funding to recapture will be added to one of the Council’s upcoming unresolved issues briefings.
Differences between CDCIP Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
The CDCIP Board’s recommendations do not include the $15 million for capital maintenance projects because
the appropriation was made after the Board’s final FY2025 budget meeting. The tables below summarize the
Mayor’s funding recommendations to use the $15 million for capital maintenance projects in three ways. The
Mayor’s recommendations also add $1.5 million of funding on top of the CDCIP Board’s funding levels from
three sources: $84,490 more from the General Fund, $750,000 more from Class C (gas tax), and $678,600
more from parks impact fees.
Mayor recommends additional funding to projects recommended by the CDCIP Board
Mayor recommends funding capital maintenance projects without CDCIP Board funding recommendations
General
Fund
Class C
(Gax Tax)
Parks
Impact
Fees
Funding Our
Future
Streets
Funding Our
Future
Transit
Transportation
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
General
Fund
Capital
Maintenance
Holding Account
Complete Streets
Reconstruction 3,500,000$1,000,000$ 4,500,000$
Completes Streets
Overlay 2,750,000$ 750,000$ 3,500,000$
Facilities
Replacement and
Renewal Plan
1,366,350$1,390,150$ 2,756,500$
Sport Courts and
Playgrounds
Replacements
549,150$ 54,490$904,450$ 1,508,090$
Traffic Signal
Replacements &
Upgrades
500,000$ 230,000$ 130,000$ 860,000$
Amplifying Our
Jordan
River Bond
1,300,000$200,000$ 1,500,000$
Project
CDCIP Board Funding Recommendations Mayor Additional
Funding Totals
(Board +
Mayor)
Page | 9
Mayor recommends substituting $3.14 million from the capital maintenance holding account for an equivalent
amount of quarter cent sales tax for transportation funding recommended by the CDCIP Board for rebuilding
the 400 South Jordan River Bridge and reallocate the $3.14 million to the Green Loop project for designing
eligible transportation parts of the project.
Budget Cleanup Position & Funding Inadvertently Not in Mayor’s Recommended Budget:
New Financial Analyst IV FTE for Impact Fees Tracking and Compliance
The Administration notified the Council Office earlier this week that a financial analyst IV FTE was
inadvertently not included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget. The position would be funded for 10 months to
recognize the time to hire at a cost of $143,258 at pay grade 32. The fully loaded annual cost is estimated at
$171,910. The position would be fully funded from impact fees and entirely dedicated to tracking, compliance,
and planning for impact fees. The four types of impact fees could equally split the cost of the position. The
Finance Department provided the below summary of why the position is needed:
"We are requesting the position based on the new requirements from the state auditor. The reporting
and tracking for impact fees has become extremely complex. All impact fees that are budgeted must be
tracked individually. This includes the dedicated revenues that are associated by the building permit as
well as any match. Individual revenues and expenses have to be tied to the individual project. This
tracking is going to take a lot of work for Salt Lake City to ensure that the revenues are being spent in a
timely fashion by project and to update the departments that the timing of the funds needing to be
spent. If we don't do this type of tracking on an ongoing basis, it could result in more refunds that have
to be given." Staff note: state law requires impact fees to be encumbered or spent within six years of
the City receiving them, and a refund of impact fees must be paid with interest to the original payor.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1.$15 Million Capital Maintenance Holding Account – The Council may wish to discuss whether
the funding recommendations for the one-time $15 million capital maintenance holding account align
with the policy goals to catch up on capital renewal and maintenance projects and any potential changes.
Some Council Members expressed interest in adding more funding for street reconstruction and overlay
projects, especially on local streets. The existing Overall Condition Index or OCI for roads that need to
be reconstructed is 83% are local and 17% are arterial (major) roads, and for roads that are eligible for
an asphalt overlay is similar at 83% local, 14% arterial, and 3% collector (in between local and arterial).
General Fund Class C
(Gax Tax)
Parks Impact
Fees
Capital Maintenance
Holding Account Totals
700 South Phase 7 from 4600 West
to 5000 West 4,500,000$ 4,500,000$
Memory Grove Park Urgent
Repairs, Preservation, and
Maintenance Plan
-$ 1,910,000$ 1,910,000$
Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and
ADA Improvements 500,000$ 500,000$
Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ 75,400$ 754,000$
Alleyway Improvements 500,000$ 500,000$
Historic Signs / Markers 30,000$ 30,000$
Public Way Concrete Replacement
and Repairs 750,000$750,000$
Project
Projects with Funding Only Recommended by the Mayor
1/4 ¢ Sales Tax for
Transportation Totals 1/4 ¢ Sales Tax for
Transportation
Capital Maintenance
Holding Account Totals
400 South Jordan River
Bridge Reconstruction 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$ 860,000$ 3,140,000$ 4,000,000$
Green Loop -$ -$ 3,140,000$ -$ 3,140,000$
Project
MayorCDCIP Board
Page | 10
2.Differences between CDCIP Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations – The Council
may wish to ask the Administration about the different funding recommendations from the CDCIP
residents advisory board and the Mayor as summarized in the three tables earlier in this report.
3.Livable Streets (Traffic Calming) Program Funding Level – The Council may wish to discuss
the funding level and pace of implementing the Livable Streets Program. See Attachment 9 with
information from the Transportation Division including second year accomplishments and maps of the
highest need zones. The Division anticipates completing 10 zones (neighborhoods) with the additional
$2 million straw polled by the Council at the June 4 meeting. An additional $8 million would be needed
to fully fund the remaining 16 high need zones (red, orange, and yellow on the color-coded map
assuming an average cost of $500,000 per zone).
4.Sidewalk Repair and Replacement Funding – The Council may wish to have a policy discussion
about the City’s overall approach to sidewalk repairs, replacements, and ADA ramps. The Council
discussed these issues in CIP last year such as using a sliding scale based on income for the 50/50 cost
share program, wanting to better understand the citywide sidewalk assessment results, how the separate
cost share program and proactive repair programs are related, and adding sidewalks as an eligible
funding strategy for the new 2025 – 2029 Consolidated Plan for CDBG. The FY2025 CIP budget
includes $750,000 for public right of way sidewalk repairs and replacements, and a separate $500,000
for the Proactive Public Way Concrete Repair Program which is broader to include assets in addition to
sidewalks like retaining walls, curb and gutter. The Council may also wish to consider whether some of
this funding should be moved out of the annual CIP competition and placed in the Engineering
Division’s operational maintenance budget. The Council endorsed this approach for multimodal bike
lane maintenance moving $200,000 from the CIP competition into the Streets Division’s base operating
budget.
5.Placeholder for Reconnecting Communities Implementation Grant Local Matching Funds
– The Council may wish to discuss when to identify local matching funds for anticipated applications to
the federal government to construction improvements addressing the east-west transportation divide.
The City received a $1.97 million grant from the federal reconnecting communities planning grant and
$1.77 million of local matching funds were provided ($1.27 million from the City and $500,000 from the
Utah Transit Authority). Council Members have encouraged the Administration to consider applying for
federal implementation grant funding which may need to be done before the final planning study report
is available. There are limited federal funding opportunities to implement the results of the study but the
largest federal grants are scheduled to only be available for two or three more years. Most of these
construction grants are authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
6.Status of 2022 Sales Tax Revenue Bond Projects – The Council may wish to request an update
and next steps for capital projects funded by the 2022 bond which have not spent most of the available
funding in the past two years such as the $6.1 million for westside railroad quiet zones, $7.5 million for
radio tower upgrades, $3 million for Fisher Mansion stabilization and improvements, $2 million for an
urban wood reutilization program, and $3 million for the city owned ballpark (before The Bees
announced a relocation out of the city). Some of these projects are issued by tax-exempt bond funds
which have approaching spending deadlines in the next couple years.
7.Status of $24.6 Million First Issuance of the Parks Bond Projects – The Council may wish to
ask the Administration for next steps to spend these funds that the Council gave final spending approval
for in October 2024. Only $30,169 out of $24.6 million has been spent so far.
8.Capital Asset Plan Early Policy Check-in Briefing – The Council may wish to request a briefing
for an early policy check-in about the guiding priorities and framework for developing the Capital Asset
Plan (five-year CIP plan bridging the City’s 20-year master plans and annual CIP budgets). Some
Council Members have expressed an interest in identifying the Livable Streets Program as a top priority
in the Capital Asset Plan to ensure funding over multiple years. They have also mentioned performance
metrics for CIP such as time from appropriation to completing construction. The FY2024 Non-
departmental budget transferred $350,000 to IMS for Capital Asset Planning software to facilitate
development and periodic updating of the plan. See Attachment 7 for the Council’s potential policy
goals, metrics, and requests from a briefing in 2019.
Page | 11
9.Inflationary Price Increases and the Cost Overrun Account – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration how inflationary price increases have impacted departments utilizing the CIP Cost
Overrun Account, and if additional funding may be needed to avoid project scope reductions. The
Council could also re-evaluate the funding level for the account and/or the formula for the maximum
amounts a project may receive, which hasn’t been updated since 2004 (see section 11 of Attachment 1).
10.Resources to Support Constituent Applications – The Council may wish to discuss with the
Administration the need to address geographic equity issues with additional targeted City resources for
neighborhoods that submit few or no constituent applicants. Some Council Members expressed interest
in being proactive to support constituent applications from neighborhoods with higher poverty rates.
Some constituents and CDCIP Board Members commented at public meetings in recent years that they
felt like some projects get more support from departments than others.
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Definition of a CIP Project
As defined in the Council-adopted 2017 Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution (Attachment
1), a CIP project must “involve the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other
physical structures, … have a useful life of five or more years, … have a cost of $50,000 or more, … or significant
functionality can be demonstrated…such as software.” The Council also set a three-year spending deadline as
part of the guiding policies. CIP accounts older than three years are periodically reviewed for recapture from
projects that finished under budget or were not pursued.
Comparison of CIP Project Requests by Year and Type
This chart was prepared by Council staff as a comparison of total project requests on the CIP funding log since
FY2017, and whether the application is from a constituent or internal to a City department. The FY2025 CIP
cycle has 72 project requests which is above average over the time shown in the chart. FY2021 had the fewest
with 19 project requests only from departments (it was intentionally an “abbreviated CIP cycle” per the
Administration at the time). FY2023 had the most with 90 project requests.
Note: this chart only includes funding requested in the competitive portion of CIP so debt service and ongoing
obligations are generally not reflected in the above figures
Cost Estimates for Regular CIP Projects
(Attachment 8)
Cost estimates will be updated over the summer to inform the Council’s project-specific deliberations in July and
August. The current version was last updated in July 2023. Cost estimates for various types of projects are based
on actual costs from recent years. The document was developed by Council staff in collaboration with the
Administration. The three categories of project cost estimates are parks, streets, and transportation. Inflation
10 13 19 14 0
24
41
29
40
67
37 35 40
19
50
49
30
32
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2022 FY2024 FY2025
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Total Project Requests by Fiscal Year (FY)
Constituent Departmental
Page | 12
and supply chain constraints have continued to impact the City’s capital projects so the costs shown in the
current version are likely more expensive now. Some categories have seen significant increases while others have
closer to typical inflation rate increases. The Engineering Division provided some context that the City doesn’t
know to what extent the larger price increases are temporary (such as related to pandemic caused short-term
supply chain disruptions) or longer-term trends.
Surplus Land Fund
The Administration reports the current available to spend balance is $4,833,240. The Surplus Land Fund
receives proceeds from the sale of real property (land and buildings). According to City policy the Surplus Land
Fund can be spent on purchasing real property. The funds are one-time because the property can only be sold
once. The funds remaining in this special account until used and do not lapse to General Fund Balance.
Cost Overrun Account
The Administration reports the current available to spend balance is $937,233. The FY2025 CIP budget includes
$223,171 of additional funding. If the two appropriations are approved, then the total available balance would be
$1,160,404. The Administration some prior year recaptured funding may also be available and the amount was
being confirmed at the time of publishing this report. The Council established this account for projects that
experience costs slightly higher than budgeted. A formula determines how much additional funding may be
pulled from the Cost Overrun account depending on the total Council-approved budget. See section 11 of
Attachment 1 for the formula. This process allows the Administration to add funding to a project without
returning to the Council in a budget amendment. A written notification to the Council on uses is required. The
purpose is to allow projects to proceed with construction instead of delaying projects until the Council can act on
a budget amendment which typically takes a few months.
1.5% for New Art and Maintenance of Existing Artworks
(New annual report is pending from the Arts Council)
The Administration stated the annual report required by ordinance about maintenance of City artworks in the
past fiscal year and planned for the next will be transmitted to the Council in July or August. This timing is after
the annual budget is adopted so the amount of funding available in CIP overall allows the 1.5% to be calculated
and inform how those funds would be used.
Salt Lake City Code, Chapter 2.30, established the Percent for Art Fund and designates roles for the Art Design
Board and Arts Council related to artist selection, project review and placement. The Public Art Program also
oversees projects with funding from the Airport and RDA. In April 2021 the Council amended Chapter 2.30 to
make several changes to the ordinance including an increase from 1% to 1.5% of ongoing unrestricted CIP
funding for art. There is no ceiling so the Council could approve funding for art above 1.5%. The ordinance also
sets a range of 10%-20% for how much of the resulting annual funding is allocated to maintenance (as opposed
to new artworks). This section of the ordinance also states that before funds are deposited into the separate
public art maintenance fund a report from the Administration will be provided to the Council identifying works
of art that require maintenance and estimated costs. This created the first ongoing dedicated funding for
conservation and maintenance of the City’s public art collection consisting of over 270 pieces and counting.
Impact Fee Unallocated “Available to Spend” Balances and Refund Tracking
The Council approved several million dollars of impact fee projects in the past few years. The table below is
current as of May 1, 2024 and includes a couple adjustments based on Budget Amendment #5 of FY2024 which
was adopted after the Mayor’s Recommended Budget was proposed to the Council on May 7. Available to spend
impact fee balances are bank account balances subtracting encumbrances and expired funds. The Mayor’s
recommended CIP budget proposes using $3,824,800 of parks impact fees. Impact fees must be encumbered or
spent within six years of the City receiving them. Expired impact fees must be returned to the entity who paid
them with interest over the intervening six years.
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date $ Expiring in
FY2027
Fire $578,695 More than two years away -
Parks $20,931,089 August 2026 $6,893,768
Police $1,553,249 More than two years away -
Transportation $1,154,192 August 2026 $2,691,888
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
Page | 13
CIP Debt Load Projections through FY2027
The Administration provided the following chart to illustrate the ratio of ongoing commitments to available
funding through FY2027. Pay as you go projects reflect new capital projects. The chart shows relatively stable
debt load projections using approximately 55% of the annual General Fund transfer to CIP. An important caveat
to note is the chart assumes 9% of ongoing General Fund revenues are transferred into CIP annually. The
FY2023 budget hit the 9% transfer goal but the City has typically been closer to 7% over the past 15 years. The
FY2024 budget transferred 7.1% of ongoing General Fund revenues into CIP (after including the Council’s $1.2
million above the Mayor’s Recommended Budget) which means less funding is available to go to new projects.
Most of these commitments are debt payments on existing bonds. Other commitments include, ESCO debt
payments, the Crime Lab lease, capital replacement funding for parks and facilities, contributions to the CIP cost
overrun account and the 1.5% for art fund. The CIP Budget Book includes an overview and details on each of the
ongoing commitments. Note that General Obligation (G.O.) bonds are not paid from CIP because they are
funded through a separate, dedicated voter-approved property tax increase.
An updated version of this chart was pending at the time of publishing this staff report. The below version is
from last year.
Clarifying “Complete Streets” and “Livable Streets” Initiatives
(See Attachment 9 for a Livable Streets Program update from the Transportation Division including second
year accomplishments and maps of the highest need zones)
There are two separate pots of funding – one for “complete streets” and another for “Livable Streets” – which are
both under the CIP umbrella. The “complete streets” funding is intended to be used to ensure that major street
reconstruction projects meet the standards defined in City Code Chapter 14.06, with elements like bike lanes
(Complete Streets). The “Livable Streets” funding is intended to be used for neighborhood scale traffic calming
projects as defined by the Livable Streets program presented to the Council in October 2021. This is separate
from street reconstruction projects. The program ranked all 113 zones citywide across several variables including
crash data, community assets, and resident socioeconomic factors. In August 2022, the Council provided policy
guidance that a citywide needs-based equity approach should be used to prioritize zones based on the ranking.
The program’s website is available at: https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/livable-
streets/#LivableStreetsProjects
Public Map of FY2025 CIP Project Applications
The Administration shared the below link to a recently published public map of the FY2025 CIP project
applications which includes an overlay of Council Districts for reference. Note that some projects are a polygon
Page | 14
for a larger area, others are lines such as for alleyway improvements, and some are dots when a project is limited
to a single property.
https://maps.slcgov.com/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=64074a434d9b4e5f86000306b65813a2
ATTACHMENTS
1. Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution 29 of 2017
2. FY2025 CIP Funding Log – Note the spreadsheet from the Administration is not formatted for printing
3. Mayor's Recommended CIP Book FY2025 Including $15 Million for Capital Maintenance
4. FY2025 Simplified CIP Funding Log by CDCIP Board Scores – PENDING
5. Overview of CIP Major Funding Sources
6. List of Completed and Unfinished Projects Older than Three Years – PENDING REVIEW BY
DEPARTMENTS FOR POTENTIAL FUNDING RECAPTURE
7. Capital Asset Plan (CAP) Council Requests from January 2019
8. Regular CIP Projects Cost Estimates (last updated July 2023)
9. Livable Streets Traffic Calming Program First Year Accomplishments Summary and Updated Zone Map
ACRONYMS
CAP – Capital Asset Plan (a five-year CIP plan)
CDBG – Community Development Block Grants
CDC – Centers for Disease Control
CDCIP – Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
ESCO – Energy Service Company
FTE – Full-time Employee
FY – Fiscal Year
GO Bond – General Obligation Bond
PSB – Public Safety Building
RESOLUTION NO . _29_0F 2017
(Salt Lake City Council capital and debt management policies.)
R 17-1
R 17-13
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council" or "Council") demonstrated its
commitment to improving the City's Capital Improvement Program in order to better address the
deferred and long-term infrastructure needs of Salt Lake City; and
WHEREAS, the analysis of Salt Lake City's General Fund Capital Improvement
Program presented by Citygate Associates in February 1999, recommended that the Council
review and update the capital policies of Salt Lake Corporation ("City") in order to provide
direction to the capital programming and budgeting process and adopt and implement a formal
comprehensive debt policy and management plan; and
WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program and budgeting practices have
evolved since 1999 and the City Council wishes to update the capital and debt management
policies by updating and restating such policies in their entirety to better reflect current
practices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to improve transparency of funding opportunities
across funding sources including General Fund dollars, impact fees, Class C (gas tax) funds,
Redevelopment Agency funds, Public Utilities funds, repurposing old Capital Improvement
Program funds and other similar funding sources.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,
Utah:
That the City Council has determined that the following capital and debt management
policies shall guide the Council as they continue to address the deferred and long-term
infrastructure needs within Salt Lake City:
Capital Policies
1. Capital Project Definition-The Council intends to define a capital project as follows:
"Capital improvements involve the construction, purchase or renovation of
buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. A capital improvement must
have a useful life of five or more years. A capital improvement is not a recurring
capital outlay item (such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine) or a maintenance
expense (such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches). In order to be
considered a capital project, a capital improvement must also have a cost of
$50,000 or more unless such capital improvement's significant functionality can
be demonstrated to warrant its inclusion as a capital project (such as software).
Acquisition of equipment is not considered part of a capital project unless such
acquisition of equipment is an integral part of the cost of the capital project."
2. Annual Capital Budget Based on 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan-The Council requests that
the Mayor's Recommended Annual Capital Budget be developed based upon the 10-Year
Capital Facilities Plan and be submitted each fiscal year to the City Council for consideration
as part of the Mayor 's Recommended Budget no later than the first Tuesday of May.
3. Multiyear Financial Forecasts-The Council requests that the Administration :
a. Prepare multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasts that correspond to the capital
program period;
b . Prepare an analysis of the City's financial condition , debt service levels within the capital
improvement budget, and capacity to finance future capital projects; and
c . Present this information to the Council in conjunction with the presentation of each one-
year capital budget.
4. Annual General Fund Transfer to CIP Funding Goal-Allocation of General Fund revenues
for capital improvements on an annual basis will be determined as a percentage of General
Fund revenue . The Council has a goal that no less than nine percent (9%) of ongoing General
Fund revenues be invested annually in the Capital Improvement Fund.
5. Maintenance Standard-The Council intends that the City will maintain its physical assets at
a level adequate to protect the City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance
and replacement costs.
6 . Capital Project Prioritization-The Council intends to give priority consideration to projects
that:
a. Preserve and protect the health and safety of the community;
b. Are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and
c. Provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in a preservation of the
community's prior investment, in decreased operating costs or other significant cost
savings , or in improvements to the environmental quality of the City and its
neighborhoods.
7. External Partnerships -All other considerations being equal, the Council intends to give fair
consideration to projects where there is an opportunity to coordinate with other agencies ,
establish a public/ private partnership, or secure grant funding .
8. Aligning Project Cost Estimates and Funding-The Council intends to follow a guideline of
approving construction funding for a capital project in the fiscal year immediately following
the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less accurate as more time
passes. The City can avoid expenses for re-estimating project costs by funding capital
projects in a timely manner.
9. Advisory Board Funding Recommendations-The Council intends that all capital projects be
evaluated and prioritized by the Community Development and Capital Improvement
Program Advisory Board . The resulting recommendations shall be provided to the Mayor ,
and shall be included along with the Mayor 's funding recommendations in conjunction with
the Annual Capital budget transmittal , as noted in Paragraph two above.
10. Prioritize Funding Projects in the 10-Year Plan-The Council does not intend to fund any
project that has not been included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan for at least one (1)
year prior to proposed funding, unless extenuating circumstances are adequately identified.
11. Cost Overrun Process -The Council requests that any change order to any capital
improvement project follow the criteria established in Resolution No. 65 of2004 which
reads as follows:
a. "The project is under construction and all other funding options and/ or methods
have been considered and it has been determined that additional funding is still
required.
b. Cost overrun funding will be approved based on the following formula:
1. 20% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets of $100,000 or less;
ii. 15% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets between $100,001 and $250,000;
iii. 10% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets over $250,000 with a maximum overrun cost of $1oo,ooo.
c. The funds are not used to pay additional City Engineering fees.
d. The Administration will submit a written notice to the City Council detailing the
additional funding awarded to projects at the time of administrative approval.
e. If a project does not meet the above mentioned criteria the request for additional
funding will be submitted as part of the next scheduled budget opening.
However, if due to timing constraints the cost overrun cannot be reasonably
considered as part of a regularly scheduled budget opening, the Administration
will prepare the necessary paperwork for review by the City Council at its next
regularly scheduled meeting."
12. Recapture Funds from Completed Capital Projects-The Council requests that the
Administration include in the first budget amendment each year those Capital Improvement
Program Fund accounts where the project has been completed and a project balance remains.
It is the Council's intent that all account balances from closed projects be recaptured and
placed in the CIP Cost Overrun Contingency Account for the remainder of the fiscal year, at
which point any remaining amounts will be transferred to augment the following fiscal year's
General Fund ongoing allocation.
13. Recapture Funds from Unfinished Capital Projects-Except for situations in which
significant progress is reported to the Council, it is the Council's intent that all account
balances from unfinished projects older than three years be moved out of the specific project
account to the CIP Fund Balance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, account balances for bond
financed projects and outside restricted funds (which could include grants, SAA or other
restricted funds) shall not be moved out of the specific project account.
14. Surplus Land Fund within CIP Fund Balance -Revenues received from the sale of real
property will go to the unappropriated balance of the Capital Projects Fund and the revenue
will be reserved to purchase real property unless extenuating circumstances warrant a
different use. It is important to note that collateralized land cannot be sold.
15 . Transparency of Ongoing Costs Created by Capital Projects-Any long-term fiscal impact to
the General Fund from a capital project creating ongoing expenses such as maintenance,
changes in electricity /utility usage, or additional personnel will be included in the CIP
funding log and project funding request. Similarly, capital projects that decrease ongoing
expenses will detail potential savings in the CIP funding log.
16. Balance Budget without Defunding or Delaying Capital Projects -Whenever possible,
capital improvement projects should neither be delayed nor eliminated to balance the
General Fund budget.
17. Identify Sources when Repurposing Old Capital Project Funds-Whenever the
Administration proposes repurposing funds from completed capital projects the source(s)
should be identified including the project name, balance of remaining funds, whether the
project scope was reduced, and whether funding needs related to the original project exist.
18. Identify Capital Project Details -For each capital project, the capital improvement projects
funding log should identify:
a. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board's
funding recommendations,
b. The Administration's funding recommendations,
c. The project name and a brief summary of the project,
d . Percentage of impact fee eligibility and type,
e. The project life expectancy,
f. Whether the project is located in an RDA project area,
g. Total project cost and an indication as to whether a project is one phase of a larger
project,
h. Subtotals where the project contains multiple scope elements that could be funded
separately,
1. Any savings derived from funding multiple projects together,
j. Timing for when a project will come on-line,
k. Whether the project implements a master plan,
1. Whether the project significantly advances the City's renewable energy or
sustainability goals,
m . Ongoing annual operating impact to the General Fund,
n. Any community support for the project -such as community councils or petitions,
o. Communities served,
p. Legal requirements/mandates,
q. Whether public health and safety is affected,
r. Whether the project is included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan,
s. Whether the project leverages external funding sources, and
t. Any partner organizations .
Debt Management Policies
1. Prioritize Debt Service for Projects in the 10 -Year Capital Facilities Plan -The Council
intends to utilize long-term borrowing only for capital improvement projects that are
included in the City's 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan or in order to take advantage of
opportunities to restructure or refund current debt. Short-term borrowing might be utilized in
anticipation of future tax collections to finance working capital needs.
2. Evaluate Existing Debt before Issuing a New Debt-The Council requests that the
Administration provide an analysis of the City's debt capacity, and how each proposal meets
the Council's debt policies, prior to proposing any projects for debt financing. This analysis
should include the effect of the bond issue on the City's debt ratios , the City 's ability to
finance future projects of equal or higher priority , and the City's bond ratings.
3. Identify Repayment Source when Proposing New Debt-The Council requests that the
Administration identify the source of funds to cover the anticipated debt service requirement
whenever the Administration recommends borrowing additional funds.
4. Monitoring Debt Impact to the General Fund-The Council requests that the Administration
analyze the impact of debt-financed capital projects on the City's operating budget and
coordinate this analysis with the budget development process.
5. Disclosure of Bond Feasibility and Challenges -The Council requests that the
Administration provide a statement from the City's financial advisor that each proposed bond
issue appears feasible for bond financing as proposed. Such statement from the City's
financial advisor should also include an indication of requirements or circumstances that the
Council should be aware of when considering the proposed bond issue (such as any net
negative fiscal impacts on the City 's operating budget, debt capacity limits , or rating
implications).
6. A void Use of Financial Derivative Instruments -The Council intends to avoid using interest
rate derivatives or other financial derivatives when considering debt issuance.
7 . Maintain Reasonable Debt Ratios-The Council does not intend to issue debt that would
cause the City's debt ratio benchmarks to exceed moderate ranges as indicated by the
municipal bond rating industry .
8. Maintain High Level Bond Ratings-The Council intends to maintain the highest credit
rating feasible and to adhere to fiscally responsible practices when issuing debt.
9. Consistent Annual Debt Payments Preferred -The Council requests that the Administration
structure debt service payments in level amounts over the useful life of the financed
project(s) unless anticipated revenues dictate otherwise or the useful life of the financed
project(s) suggests a different maturity schedule.
10. Sustainable Debt Burden-The Council intends to combine pay-as-you-go strategy with
long-term financing to keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit continued AAA general
obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity in case of
emergency.
11. Lowest Cost Options-The City will seek the least costly financing available when evaluating
debt financing options .
12. Avoid Creating Structural Deficits-The City will minimize the use of one-time revenue to
fund programs/projects that require ongoing costs including debt repayments.
13. Aligning Debt and Project Timelines-Capital improvement projects financed through the
issuance of bonded debt will have a debt service that is not longer than the useful life of the
project.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this -~3L.Lr_...d ___ day of
October , 2017.
ATTEST :
HB _A TTY -#64309 -v3-CIP _a nd _ Debt_ Management_Pol icies
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By 4 = ASL
CHAIRPERSON -=-::::::::____
Salt Lake City
App ed As To Form
By: ~~~~~~~.P
aysen Oldroyd
Da e: lt:>/-:z.../ 17
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
REQUEST 858,800$
CDCIP 858,800$ 858,800$
MAYOR 858,800$ 858,800$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 4,000,000$
CDCIP 4,000,000$ 4,000,000$
MAYOR 4,000,000$ 860,000$ 3,140,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 124,000$
CDCIP 124,000$ 124,000$
MAYOR 124,000$ 124,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 4,500,000$
CDCIP 3,500,000$ 3,500,000$
MAYOR 4,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 1,000,000$
COUNCIL -$
400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction
Engineering Division
This project will reconstruct the 400 South vehicle bridge over the Jordan River. This bridge
has deteriorated to a rating below 60 on the Bridge Health Index (BHI) as determined by UDOT
bridge inspection. Engineering had planned a rehabilitation project for the existing bridge
structure in previous years, however continued degradation, accelerated by the 2020
earthquake, has made reconstruction necessary. A consulting firm with specialized experience
will be used for this project.
2
Liberty Park Greenhouse Restoration
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The purpose of this proposal is to identify steps to secure the Liberty Park Greenhouse (LPG),
restore it to its once historical prominence, and identify innovative ways to renovate/redesign
the building to enhance its educational / recreational / environmental conservancy value to the
community. This work will be completed in advance of other funded work to produce design
and construction documents for the reconstruction of the greenhouse.
1) Facility Structural Audit Initiative- Funds would be used to develop/issue a call for
proposals, select a vendor, and pay for contracted engineering services to assess in detail the
current condition of the facility, identify construction services, and develop construction
documents to support structural restoration.
2) Facility Redesign Initiative- Working from/building upon the Facility Structural Audit, funds
would be allocated to support a case competition conducted the University of Utah's College of
Architecture and Planning Department aimed at completing design work that preserve the
facility's historical roots, provide multiple programming to enhance the community's
biodiversity/recreational/ educational interests as well as contribute to Liberty Park's overall
aesthetic beauty.
Complete Streets Reconstruction
Engineering Division
This annual program funds the vital reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including street
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate
complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements.
4
3
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration
Fire Department
The fire training tower is experiencing significant deterioration, posing safety concerns that
necessitate urgent attention. To rectify the situation, essential measures include patching
spalled concrete, addressing rebar corrosion, repairing cracks, and implementing waterproofing
measures. Ensuring the structural integrity of the tower is paramount, not only to maintain its
functionality but also to safeguard the well-being of individuals utilizing the facility for training
purposes.
1
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 1
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 921,700$
CDCIP 921,700$ 804,500$ 117,200$
MAYOR 921,700$ 804,500$ 117,200$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 3,500,000$
CDCIP 2,750,000$ 2,750,000$
MAYOR 3,500,000$ 2,750,000$ 750,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 750,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
7
6
Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents
Public Lands Department
In 2023, the Salt Lake City Public Services Department and Facilities Division completed a
Facility Condition Assessment for the greenhouse. This report identified the overall facility
condition as poor/failing. As of January 2024, Public Lands is no longer using the facility for
operational purposes.The Liberty Park Greenhouse, first constructed in 1902, has been the
primary greenhouse facility in Salt Lake City to propagate, grow, and store flowers, native
plants, and shrubs for planting throughout Salt Lake City’s Public Lands system. The
greenhouse has been a critical operational facility for the Public Lands Department and has
become an iconic and historic public asset within the City’s largest park. The recommended
phasing strategy includes:
1. Initial Facility Condition Assessment: Completed in 2023.
2. Detailed Structural Assessment for East Greenhouse: Funding Requested through FY 24
Budget Amendment 2. Completion of this step may allow for the use of the east greenhouse
while other areas undergo planning, design, and reconstruction.
3. Complete Structural Assessment: Funding requested through an FY 25 constituent CIP
application, separate from this application.
4. Design and Construction Documents for the construction of new greenhouse facilities:
Funding requested through this FY 25 internal CIP application, building off of the tasks funded
by the requested constituent application.
5. Renovation of the east greenhouse and reconstruction of the remaining greenhouses:
Future/timeline TBD, based on successful, subsequent funding request in FY 25-26.
5
Complete Streets Overlay
Engineering Division
This annual program funds the overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the level of
deterioration where full reconstruction is required. This Engineering Division overlay program
includes a 3” or greater depth asphalt mill and overlay (thicker than Streets Division
maintenance overlays of 2” or less), curb and gutter replacement and sidewalk replacement in
select locations, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate Complete Streets bicycle
and pedestrian access improvements.
Public Way Concrete
Engineering Division
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility
ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking,
or removal and replacement.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 2
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 2,756,500$
CDCIP 1,366,350$ 1,366,350$
MAYOR 2,756,500$ 1,366,350$ 1,390,150$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 2,200,000$
CDCIP 2,200,000$ 2,200,000$
MAYOR 2,200,000$ 2,200,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,500,000$
CDCIP 750,000$ 750,000$
MAYOR 750,000$ 750,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 600,000$
CDCIP 300,000$ 300,000$
MAYOR 300,000$ 300,000$
COUNCIL -$
10
9
8
11 Safer Crossings Citywide
Transportation Division
Pedestrian-focused crossings such as HAWK Beacons, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons,
raised crosswalks, curb extensions, and other similar safety improvements.
Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan
Facilities Division
The Facility Renewal and Deferred Asset Management Initiative for Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) is a
targeted effort aligned with the 10-year plan. Our goal is to strategically manage the existing
backlog of deferred assets by categorizing and prioritizing them based on building and
component criticality. This involves dividing the current backlog into three equal parts,
enabling us to address an approximately consistent number of assets per year. Additionally, we
aim to proactively tackle 50% of incoming deferred assets to prevent further accumulation. This
focused approach ensures efficient resource allocation and sets the foundation for sustained
facility enhancement over the coming years. It's crucial to highlight the ongoing facilities
condition assessment. This assessment will provide insight into the overall health of our
buildings and components, enabling us to make more informed decisions regarding
replacement and renewal.
Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements - Phase I
Facilities Division
Plaza 349 is critical to the day-to-day operations of the city by hosting several key departments
including: Human Resources, Engineering, Information Management Services, Transportation,
and Building Inspection divisions. In 2019 a space planning and vulnerability study identified
key elements to be updated that included life safety, access controls, and security. Facilities has
also identified key assets that include the HVAC system and parking structure. This CIP
application is for the first phase of the project and will include upgrading life safety, security,
HVAC design, and key HVAC asset upgrades. In 2022, Colvin Engineering completed an HVAC
replacement feasibility study, which will aid in this initiative.
Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Transit
Transportation Division
Continue our partnership with UTA installing bus stops, mobility hubs, and accessible first/last-
mile connections to them, on frequent transit routes. This program implements two of the key
recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe,
and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. UTA provides stop amenities in-kind and
maintains them for the life of the assets. Some of the new shelters are now equipped with
lighting, which will make passengers who are waiting more visible to operators, as well as to
increase safety and security while they are waiting. Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan,
a highly visible frequent service brand has been developed and is ready for deployment of this
brand and associated enhanced amenities at Frequent Transit Route bus stops throughout the
city. These investments in branding and enhanced stations can help achieve the Transit Master
Plan goal of providing a safe and comfortable transit access and waiting experience.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 3
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 960,000$
CDCIP 480,000$ 480,000$
MAYOR 480,000$ 480,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 3,250,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
13
12 Sugar House Park – Two Pavilion Replacements
Public Lands Department
Sugar House Park’s seven pavilions are over 50 years old—beyond their lifespan—and do not
meet code or accessibility guidelines. Failure of the pavilions could lead to injury or death. A
2016 Pavilion Study by Salt Lake County recommends full replacement of all seven pavilions.
This application seeks funding to match the County’s funding to replace one of these seven, as
well as associated amenities (signage, tables, barbecues, landscaping, water, and accessibility
features). Approving this funding will bring the total number of pavilions that have been or can
be replaced to two. (Recent City and County funding will replace the Fabian Lakeside Pavilion
in 2024.) Five remain to be funded. Approval of this request will provide park patrons (typically
Salt Lake City residents) with one complete pavilion replacement (a $960,000 project value) for
the cost (to the City) of just half of one. In 1957, with the incorporation of Sugar House Park,
Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County made a contractual agreement to jointly own the park
property and appropriate funds for facilities. The Sugar House Park Authority depends on these
appropriations from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County to carry out the park’s purpose as an
equitable, regional park of the highest quality. Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County are
committed to matching one another’s funds (1:1) and continuing this partnership to improve or
replace more assets in the future.
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting Irrigation Systems,
and Reducing Water Use
Public Lands Department
(1) improving irrigation efficiency and (2) replacing some turf areas with low-water, regionally-
appropriate plantings. Many of our public lands’ irrigation systems are 50-60 years old. They
use more water, take more time, and cost more to maintain than newer systems. Converting
irrigation systems so that trees can be watered separately from turf reduces water usage and
protects these critical assets, too. During extreme drought conditions, upgraded irrigation
systems can also dramatically reduce or even turn off turf irrigation while continuing to water
trees.The minimum effective amount of funding for this fiscal year's request is $500,000:
design and new irrigation for roughly 2.5 acres. Fully funding the request ($3.25M), however,
would fund new irrigation systems for up to 16 acres (which is less than 2% of the Public Lands
Department's irrigated landscapes). Due to the 25-30 year lifespan of irrigation systems and
some landscapes, ongoing requests would likely need to be around the $6M to $9M per year. If
partially funded, as recommended in the Mayor’s Budget, the Public Lands Department will
choose up to two acres from one or more of the following six priority sites within three types of
public lands (natural lands, parks, and islands): Miller Park, Wasatch Hollow Park and
Preserve, Ensign Peak, Allen Park, 1200 East islands (from South Temple to 400 South), and
1300 East median and park strips (from Parkway Ave to Claybourne Ave).
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 4
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 1,300,000$
CDCIP 1,300,000$ 1,300,000$
MAYOR 1,300,000$ 1,300,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 100,000$
CDCIP 100,000$ 100,000$
MAYOR 100,000$ 100,000$
COUNCIL -$
15
14 HVAC Control Replacement at the Public Safety Building
Facilities Division
At Public Safety Building, we have outdated Microsoft servers unsupported beyond Windows
Server 2016 and an obsolete Siemens Apogee building controls system. These vulnerabilities
jeopardize both operational efficiency and public safety. To address these pressing concerns, we
advocate for a holistic upgrade strategy. This involves transitioning from the unsupported
Microsoft 2012 and Siemens Apogee systems to Utah Yamas Controls. Our proposed solution
encompasses upgrading the City's EBO platform, provisioning advanced automation servers,
modernizing essential building systems, replacing antiquated temperature sensors, and
deploying new communication wiring throughout the facility. By implementing these upgrades,
we aim to enhance operational reliability, security, and resilience at the critical public safety
building, safeguarding both personnel and the community.
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Friends of Fairmont Park propose a Restroom Pilot CIP for 2024-25 for: (1) a planning study to
update planning guidance for city-wide parks restroom policy and practice, (2) conceptual
design for a new restroom if warranted by the study; (3) with the recommendation that a new
design be built and tested in Fairmont Park to demonstrate whether or not any new guidance is
workable in the Salt Lake context. Note that it is expected that the new design strategy will
reduce vandalism and maintenance costs and increase restroom uptime and safety. The intent
is to benchmark a proposed new restroom configuration against the current design in other
parks, to test the viability of this approach, developing best practice in park restroom
management for the city. Restroom safety and vandalism present ongoing problems in City
parks, especially the large, heavily used parks.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 5
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 1,600,000$
CDCIP 970,000$ 20,000$ 950,000$
MAYOR 970,000$ 20,000$ 950,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 3,100,000$
CDCIP 549,150$ 549,150$
MAYOR 1,508,090$ 549,150$ 54,490$ 904,450$
COUNCIL -$
17
16 Neighborhood Byways Program
Transportation Division
This project requests design and construction 30% matching funds for two neighborhood
byways currently under consideration for 70% state funding, under UDOT’s Transit
Transportation Investment Program, First-Last Mile (TTIF-FLM). The 800 East Neighborhood
Byway, Phase 2 (1300 South to the 900 East TRAX Station, 1.5 miles), would construct a first-
last mile connection to Red Line TRAX. UDOT has ranked this project #10 statewide. If state
funds are not received, this request will enable the project to construct intersection
improvements at 1300 South to connect the completed Phase 1 portion of the byway (1300 S to
1700 S) to future phases north of 1300 S. Funds would also be used for the design from 1300 S
to 900 E TRAX station, with construction funds to be sought in a subsequent year. The
Kensington Neighborhood Byway (1500 South, from West Temple to the McClelland Trail) has
already received both CIP and federal funds. However, construction costs have escalated, and a
more robust crossing of 700 East (a state highway) has been negotiated with UDOT than
previously anticipated. It is part of the east-west neighborhood byway traversing most of the
city east of I-15, connecting to the westside via the 1300 South viaduct. This crossing has also
been nominated for TTIF-FLM, and ranked #11 statewide, right behind the 800 East Project. If
state funds are not awarded, additional funds would be needed to complete the funding
package.
Courts & Playgrounds
Public Lands Department
This application will fund the replacement of one playground or partial reconstruction or
resurfacing of at least one court (some of our system’s most well-used and high-demand assets)
that are in the poorest condition. 63% of Public Lands assets have been evaluated to be in poor
or fair condition. With a typical lifespan of 20-30 years, it is essential that, going forward, the
City replace at least two playgrounds and one to two courts every year to ensure safe and
accessible features in our parks.
The following is a list of potential parks where court improvements or one playground
replacement project could occur, in descending order of priority (including condition,
opportunity, geographic need, and equity criteria).
1. Popperton Park (playground)
2. Wasatch Hollow Park (playground)
3. Sunnyside Park (courts)
4. 10th East Senior Center (courts)
5. Riverside Park (courts and playground)
6. Fairmont Park (courts, possibly playground)
7. Warm Springs Park (courts)
8. Westpointe Park (courts and playground)
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 6
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 4,500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 4,500,000$ 4,500,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 2,700,000$
CDCIP 730,000$ 230,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 860,000$ 230,000$ 500,000$ 130,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,910,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 1,910,000$ 1,910,000$
COUNCIL -$
20
19
18 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding
Engineering Division
The project is desperately needed to complete the last half mile of 700 South’s 4.6 mile long
reconfiguration from 25 Ft wide deteriorated asphalt road to a 50 FT wide concrete street with
bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage from Redwood Rd to 5600 West.
Where 700 South meets the Union Pacific rail at 4800 West is the City’s worst street/rail
intersection. The rail crossing restricts emergency services, causing re-routing delays, and
brings a plethora of constituent service requests each year.
Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program
Transportation Division
Based on condition rankings, the proposed allocation will fund the replacement of two traffic
signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies. The typical life of a
traffic signal is 30 years. After that age, frequent repairs are needed, and the structural supports
for the traffic signal may be at risk of failing, such that the signal might fall over including
potentially onto people or vehicles. But age is only one factor in ranking. Ranking has been
determined by an independent study, that combines equipment age, equipment condition, and
maintenance staff input. Signals that need frequent repairs are targeted for replacement.
Depending on actual construction costs, this amount may be sufficient to also upgrade one
intersection signal detection (which triggers a signal to respond to traffic, bicyclists, and
pedestrians) to current standards, and to replace one non-functional CCTV camera, used to
monitor signal operations to allow real-time signal adjustments in collaboration with UDOT's
valley-wide network.
Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs + Preservation & Maintenance Plan
Public Lands Department
Memory Grove is one of Salt Lake City’s most iconic park spaces. It is one of the thriving
cultural centerpieces of Salt Lake City’s parks system. But the features that draw visitors to the
Park – the historic features and mature trees that give Memory Grove its unique atmosphere –
are in a state of accelerating deterioration.
This funding would facilitate the completion of significant improvements to Memory Grove
Park through two phases:
(Phase 1, $1,750,000) Urgent capital repairs to be completed as soon as possible, with the
guidance of historic landscape architects and the Utah State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO). It is critical to the continued success of Memory Grove that the City begins now to
restore, preserve, and renew the assets that create the unique character of Memory Grove.
(Phase 2, $160,000) The development of a Preservation & Maintenance Plan for Memory Grove
Park and the Freedom Trail.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 7
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 1,410,300$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,500,000$
CDCIP 1,300,000$ 1,300,000$
MAYOR 1,500,000$ 1,300,000$ 200,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 3,000,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
24
23
22
21
Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Leveraging Bond Investment
Public Lands Department
Doubles the impact of the estimated $1,250,000 in GO Bond funding planned for the segment
of the Jordan River corridor between Indiana Avenue and California Avenue. Bond funding is
intended to focus on overall corridor improvements, water trail development, irrigation, tree
health, and the Parkway Trail: namely, non-impact fee eligible costs. This impact fee funding,
however, will be used on increasing level of service along and near the Jordan River corridor
and its public lands spaces, particularly focused on increasing safety, activation, and recreation
amenities. Some likely, high-priority improvements may include water and resource-efficient
irrigation and planting where they do not currently exist, additional lighting, nature-focused
pathways, river interaction and education opportunities, and additional features that activate
the corridor.
The River corridor’s Indiana Avenue to California Avenue segment has the highest
concentration of destinations and activity: seven parks and open spaces, and active
transportation intersections of the 9-Line Trail, the Jordan River Parkway Trail, sidewalks, and
bike lanes on Indiana, 900 West, and California. Of these seven spaces, the International Peace
Gardens, Bend in the River, and Modesto Park face difficult challenges that have made them
high-need, high-priority areas for both the Public Lands Department and the surrounding
communities.
Livable Streets Traffic Calming Program
Transportation Division
Note: The Council approved $2 million from the Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation's
fund balance (separate from General Fund Balance) as part of the annual budget adoption on
June 13
Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvements
Arts Council
The Salt Lake City Arts Council, part of the Department of Economic Development, requests
will address failing infrastructure (due to flooding, neglect, and lifespan end), ADA
requirements, energy efficiency, and the option to provide additional services to the public.
Items include: Interior Accessibility Ramp, Energy Efficient Gallery Lighting Upgrade,
Hardwood Floor Replacement, and Lower Level Community workspace/office renovations.
Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements
Fire Department
The fire training ground site improvement includes the excavation and construction of paved
area surrounding fire training props to allow access for firefighters and fire vehicles as they
train. Ideally this training ground would simulate a small cross section of the structures that are
in Salt Lake City and the site improvement would resemble streets and access points like what
is in the city. Currently there is approximately 45,000 square feet of underutilized training
ground.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 8
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 200,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 250,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
25
27
26
Jordan River Trail Safer Crossing Improvements
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
This project would fund design and construction of a raised crosswalk at 200 South on the
Jordan River Parkway Trail. This would also fund the installation of improved safety and
visibility features as well as aesthetic improvements at the I-80 underpass to enhance safety
and comfortability at this key section of the trail.
Police Department Training Center
Police Department
The police department requires a dedicated Training Facility. As SLC grows, so does the public
safety need. The SLCPD on-boards and trains 50-80 employees a year. The training consists of
a state certified satellite police academy and exclusive SLCPD academy. Both curriculums
require facilities to be effective and complete. Additionally, the department has statutory
training requirements for over 600 officers, which requires dedicated facilities (range, scenario
locations, emergency vehicle operations, arrest control and defensive tactics mat room, exercise
facility, dedicated academy and in-service classrooms, etc.). The department currently uses
community classrooms and a dilapidated city warehouse for academy training and in-service
training.
Pedestrian Safety / HAWK at Richmond St. and Zenith Ave.
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
I've lived at the corner of Richmond and Zenith for 3 years and walk across Richmond daily to
get to the daycare on another corner. Many pedestrians cross Richmond to get to daycare,
parks, bus stops, the grocery store, and Nibley Park School. Pedestrian traffic is only likely to
increase as more apartment buildings are completed in the Brickyard area. Despite all the
pedestrian traffic, Richmond remains a 4-lane street with a turning lane in the middle a road
design the city has expressed interest in replacing to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety (e.g.,
the 2100 S reconstruction). There is only a set of flashing pedestrian yield signs at Richmond
and Zenith, which drivers either don't notice or choose to disregard. My family and I often
stand at the Zenith corner so long, waiting for all 4 lanes to stop, that we have to hit the
pedestrian crosswalk button more than once. There are no speed limit signs on Richmond
between the controlled intersection at 1300 E/Highland and the next controlled intersection at
Richmond/Brickyard, nearly a half mile apart. Almost everything in between is residential.
With no expected reasons to slow down or stop, drivers treat Richmond like a highway.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 9
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 4,600,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 385,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
30
29
28 Transportation Corridor Transformations Program
Transportation Division
This funding will be used to make transformative transportation changes to streets that are not
in need of reconstruction. This includes changes to streets that are receiving surface treatments
(chip seal or slurry seal) and/or streets that are being repaved without full reconstruction.
Some streets may also receive transformative changes to transportation use without
resurfacing. These funds are generally used to make corridor-long changes to several blocks of
street, including but not limited to changes to striping, lane configurations, changes to curbs,
parking, streetscape elements such as street trees, and installation of semi-permanent
infrastructure such as separation curbs, bollards, delineators, or planters. Streets that are
anticipated to be considered with FY25 funds include sections of 500 or 600 South Grand
Boulevards, 900 South Streetscape additions, and several streets being resurfaced citywide.
Jordan River Trail Food Forest + Partner Garden
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The main purpose of this project is to install city water access to a new Wasatch Community
Gardens (WCG) food forest farm and the Og Woi People's Orchard and Garden (a project of
Blue Sky Institute), located on adjoining parcels of public land along the Jordan River Trail in
Fairpark/Rose Park. The WCG Food Forest Farm will serve as a living pantry to a community
without access to fresh, local food in an underutilized area with contaminated soil. The space
will be transformed from inoperable to flourishing through diverse planting of edible plants that
attempt to mimic the ecosystems and patterns found in nature. The Og Woi People' s Orchard
and Garden (OPOG) is a community collective project that serves as a model of how food can be
free and accessible. It involves helping a fruit orchard and associated vegetable gardens thrive,
with the intent of providing the produce grown by the plants to the people in the community. It
is also a place to enhance the overall health of the environment and to learn and teach
community resiliency and caring. Now that the OPOG site has been added to WCG's Green City
Grower's contract with Salt Lake City, WCG will partner with Og Woi to ensure all city
established management and infrastructure guidelines for a community garden are followed,
per WCG's documented and demonstrated best practices. As part of this partnership, WCG will
act as liaison between the participants in the Og Woi garden and SLC via the Green City
Grower's contract.
Urban Trails Program
Transportation Division
This FY25 request for citywide urban trails is anticipated to fund a new extension of the Sugar
House Greenway to complement S-Line Extension; provide funding for the currently
nicknamed “Alphabet Trail” which is roughly parallel to the “alphabet streets” along 1300 East
south of I-80; and to implement other trails, citywide, included in the Pedestrian and Bicycle
Master Plan (2015).
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 10
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 1,100,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
32
31 Route 209 - Accessibility, Bus Shelters, Benches, and Trash Cans
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
When the UTA created the new 209 route through the Avenues they greatly increased the
frequency and access to downtown / the U / Millcreek--it's great for mobility. However, nearly
every bus stop is non-ADA accessible, lacks benches / stools to support riders while they wait, a
shelter to protect them in the winter nor trash bins. My house is directly in front of a bus stop
and riders have left trash all over the street, the bus has to use my driveway to let anyone in a
wheelchair board and riders end up sitting in my yard when it's inclement weather because of
the protection of the trees. Every bus stop I've driven along the 209 route is the same--there are
no benches, there are no trash cans, and almost all of them don't have a clear easement from
sidewalk to curb to assist ADA / elderly riders. This is a huge opportunity to improve rider
safety and access, provide support and shelter to our riders and make sure neighborhoods stay
clean and safe. Adding more features to each bus stop would greatly improve community
support for expanded access to public transit.
Fairmont Park East Enhancement
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The project will improve the currently unsafe east side of Fairmont Park through numerous
enhancements that provide safer access and usability. These changes are urgently needed before
three new high-rise apartment complexes (due east of the park) come online in the next year or
two. The overall project may include, in order of priority and with the associated divisions, the
following:
#1 (Transportation Division Projects), an active transportation path connecting the east
Fairmont Park entrance to the S-Line Trail, adding ADA access to the east entrance (replacing
stairs), space for food trucks and dining infrastructure on the west side of 1100 East, and raised
crosswalks on 1100 East
#2 (Public Lands Department, repair the firepit area and add signage about historic
significance; add additional lighting to help prevent loitering/camping in this area; add a
woodchip pollinator pathway along the riparian for a closer look into the pollinator habitat.
Providing more interpretive signage
#3 (Public Lands Department), daylighting a spring and extending the existing boardwalk over
the spring, on the east side of the pond where it now flows across the sidewalk.
#4 (Arts Council), adding art features
#5 (Fire Department, Transportation Division, Public Lands Department), building a pollinator-
friendly median on 1100 East, pending Fire Department and Transportation Division review
and approval
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 11
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 10,000,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 3,140,000$ 3,140,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 170,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 337,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
35
34
33 Green Loop Implementation
Public Lands Department
This funding request is a joint application between Public Lands and Transportation, with
active participation from several other departments. The Green Loop project reimagines part of
the City’s underutilized public rights-of-way as functional green space in the heart of
downtown. Transformation of the public right-of-way requires design and construction of both
above-ground improvements (sidewalks, paths, bikeways, plazas, roadway, forest, plantings,
park features, and rain gardens) and below-ground infrastructure (public and private utilities).
Project costs include design and construction of above-ground green space, roadway
reconstruction, and some utility (public and private) relocation. The intent of this application is
to allocate funding to bring strategic segments of the Green Loop to construction as soon as
possible, particularly where there are timely opportunities to leverage grant funds and/or
develop financial partnerships. Robust public engagement is currently informing an in-progress
planning, and design process to develop a schematic design for the 200 East segment of the
Green Loop (South Temple to 900 South) and potentially others as opportunities arise.
Main Street Alley Improvements, from No-Tell Motel to Utah Pride
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
This application is for safety improvements for the public alleyway that runs north-south
between Main Street and Richards Street, for two blocks in particular: from behind the Utah
Pride Center to Andrew Avenue, one door north of the Main Street Motel. This application
unanimously supported by the board of the Ballpark Community Council together with Josh
Blankenship, who leads our neighborhood's weekly volunteer trash pickup group. Currently the
alley is without lighting and is bordered by several properties that are temporarily closed (The
Utah Pride Center), are periodically closed and are scheduled to be permanently closed (Smith's
Ballpark), homes that have been unoccupied and have been boarded for 7-9 years (1411 and
1415 S. Richards Street), or have been on pause in their development for over a year (1448 -
1470 S. Main Street, the Gabbott's Row 40-unit townhome-style apartments proposed for that
site). The improvements we are requesting would follow recommendations from the Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
Faultline Park Playground
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Replace playground equipment at Faultline Park which will include a new design, removal of
existing play equipment, concrete footings and surfacing. The new playground should
approximately be in the same footprint as the existing which will mean only minor
modifications to the surrounding surfacing. Lastly will be the installation of new play
equipment and surfacing. There may be existing site furnishings around the playground that
will need to be replaced.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 12
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 2,517,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 601,900$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 115,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
38
37
36 Guadalupe Neighborhood Streets Improvement
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The Guadalupe Community Improvement project aims to enhance pedestrian mobility in
Historic Guadalupe Neighborhood through the improvement of N 500 W. The project aims to
enhance pedestrian mobility through the installation of sidewalks and added street lights for
nighttime visibility and activation. Additionally, the inclusion of a bike lane, contingent on the
city's safety assessment, further promotes safe transportation options that'll connect cyclists in
the neighborhood to the larger SLC bike lane network. To mitigate environmental impact from
the highly active and nearby train tracks, a protective barrier along these tracks will prevent
aggregate leakage onto the road as well as keep pedestrians from crossing train tracks via Union
Pacific property, while the potential introduction of trees along the street adjacent to the
railroad tracks not only enhances the visual appeal but also contributes to noise and air quality
improvement.
Plaza 349 EV Charging Phase 1 and 2
Public Services Department
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a crucial project dedicated to upgrading the
charging infrastructure at Plaza 349. Situated off 200 E and University Boulevard, the Plaza 349
complex comprises an office building and a six-level parking garage, both served by a single
existing electrical service. The proposed project involves installing (20) new Level 2 charger
ports and backfeeding (4) pre-existing charging ports within the Plaza 349 parking garage,
which currently accommodates (38) fleet vehicles according to telematics data. Following the
recommendations from Kimley-Horn & Sawatch, the initial funding will support the first two
phases, including the installation of a new utility switching cabinet and transformer
strategically placed between the main building and parking garage to facilitate the required
electrical service for efficient EV charging. This initiative aligns with our commitment to
sustainable transportation and positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the
evolving needs of our expanding EV fleet.
500 East Raised Crosswalk (400 Block)
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
First Step House respectfully requests that the City implement a mid-block raised crosswalk on
500 E between 400 S and 500 E. Raised crosswalks improve safety for both vehicles and
pedestrians. This block of 500 E features mixed-use residential housing on the east side and a
Smith's Marketplace and bus station on the west side. First Step House operates a residential
treatment facility, outpatient treatment center, and two permanent supportive housing
buildings on the east side of the block. These buildings have 186 beds for residential clients and
provide outpatient services to dozens more individuals every day. The population served is very
low-income. First Step House clients primarily navigate the city on foot, including when they
get groceries or take the bus. A raised crosswalk between the residential side of the street and
the Smith's on the other side would dramatically improve safety for all pedestrians, including
200+ First Step House clients each day, and help calm traffic in a busy city passage.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 13
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 874,400$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 620,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 807,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 530,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
40
39
42
41
PSB EV Charging Phase 1 and 2
Public Services Department
We are seeking funding for the initial two phases of a vital project aimed at upgrading the
charging infrastructure at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a central facility for the
city's police and fire departments, emergency operations center, and combined dispatch unit.
The project involves the installation of (20) new Level 2 charger ports, along with backfeeding
(10) pre-existing ports within the existing two-floor garage, catering to a fleet of (50) public
services, police, and fire vehicles. Following the recommendations from Kimley-Horn &
Sawatch, the proposed funding will support the first two phases, which include the installation
of a new utility transformer on the east end of the property to facilitate the required electrical
service for efficient EV charging. This investment aligns with our commitment to sustainable
transportation and positions our city at the forefront of accommodating the evolving needs of
our expanding EV fleet.
Poplar Grove Park Lighting
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Safety and utility lighting around the perimeter and some interior of Poplar Grove Park. The
new lights will offer lighting to the sidewalks surrounding the park without increasing light
pollution to the surrounding neighborhood. Using the cities Victorian style lights with
underground power. This will allow the removal of overhead poles, which would remove clutter
from the skyline. Most of the existing poles only deliver power to the existing light fixtures,
(essentially stringing up extension cords in the sky.)
With proper placement, poles existing around the park, lighting street intersections can be
removed as well, offering further improvement of the skyline. The new lights should have
fresnel glass guiding the majority of the light down toward the sidewalk. Or appropriate task
light such as lighting an intersection and crosswalk.
California Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvements Construction
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project will implement the recommendations of a previously funded study to make
pedestrian safety improvements at the intersections of California Avenue and Concord
Street/Glendale Drive.
600 South Safety Improvements
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project aims to create a more complete 600 S street by implementing elements of the One-
Way Grand Boulevard Street Typology to the street. This would include the addition of
protected bicycle lanes, and bulb-outs or enhanced crossings that slow down traffic and
encourage drivers to check for people crossing. Our preferred solution is to create protected
bike lanes 200 E to 600 E, add bulb-outs where they do not exist, and install decorative
crossings. 600 S fronts several community destinations, like parks, recreation centers, and
shopping centers. Traffic volume data from UDOT shows a substantial decrease in traffic on
600 S east of State St (from 39,000 to 21,000) while the same number of travel lanes is
maintained. The project is unlikely to have a significant impact on motor vehicle travel times or
parking while increasing safety for all users and accommodating more modes of travel. The CIP
supports the city's goal of Vision Zero and helps create better community space.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 14
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 52,600$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 530,000$
CDCIP 530,000$ 530,000$
MAYOR 530,000$ 530,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 960,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 80,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
45
44
43
46 Marmalade-Fairpark East-West Connector Study
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Critical to the area's success is the design and construction of a safe intersection at 400 N 400
W that may involve concepts such as reduced lanes, raised crosswalks, benches, pedestrian
refuge islands, and possible greening of park strips. Placemaking, activation, and creating
connections to the multiple local businesses and community nodes (public library, schools, etc.)
in the area are features of this project. Multiple local businesses in the area ask for safer
connections and a more cohesive transportation network tie-in from various surrounding
neighborhoods. The project would take a phased approach, beginning with a study to create
recommendations and appropriate technical solutions for the project area. This request is for
Phase 1 - Study, with the potential for design depending on level of funding.
Victory Park Tennis Courts
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The project will resurface two existing tennis courts. Remove grape vines that create leaf clutter
from the existing south fence and make all necessary fence repairs.
Riverside Park Pathway Loop
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Create a looping recreational pathway that accommodates multiple user types that goes through
the park and utilizes the Jordan River Parkway Trail. Creating a looping path gives the people
who recreate at Riverside Park a place to continuously walk and recreate in a fixed location that
is ADA accessible. Potentially something that resembles something like the looping pathways at
Liberty and Sugar House Parks.
Improve or widen strategic pathways in the park: As an important community asset that has
been historically underserved and not seen capital improvements in 27 years, we believe this
park and our community deserve the investment required to have amenities on par with Liberty
Park and Sugar House Park. Making the pathways at Riverside Park more accessible,
connected, and purposeful serves to improve the health and happiness of our communities.
Curtis Park Reimagined
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Curtis Park hosts a boarded-up playground and underutilized open space. Despite its state, the
area remains highly frequented due to its proximity to the bustling Foothill Village and vibrant
surrounding communities. Our project aims to revitalize this space in tandem with Foothill
Village's 2024-2025 multimillion dollar remodel and their new grand promenade exiting
directly onto this public land.
Revamping the Park. Replacing the worn playground with a larger, contemporary version and
reducing physical barriers by lowering the earth wall along 2200 E., installing ADA-accessible
ramps, stairs, and concrete pathways, including a corridor to the forthcoming Foothill Village
entrance, construction of a centralized pavilion, and addressing safety issues.
This initiative deserves CIP funding because of timely relevance, promoting walkability,
enhancing safety, and community transformation. Acknowledging the current economic
challenges, we propose a phased three-year project that optimizes CIP funds.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 15
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 754,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 754,000$ 678,600$ 75,400$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 560,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
48
47 Fairmont Park Basketball Court
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Over the last few years, there has been a lot of investment in Fairmont Park. The improvements
to the pond, playground, dog park, jogging paths, and pickleball courts have brought a lot of
new activity and users to the park. More activity means that usage of the basketball court has
increased, as well. The court is currently a half-court size, with one hoop, no lines to indicate
the free throw or 3-point line, no lighting, and uneven concrete. The latter often results in
puddles after rain. The single hoop and small court create a bottleneck in the park, and users
often must wait to use the court on summer evenings. This proposal would create a standard
full-size court (94 ft by 50 ft) with six hoops (one full court and four perpendicular half courts)
and lighting for evening use. Improvements to the basketball court would not impact the
adjacent soccer fields and would require minimal grading. These improvements would be
similar to those made to the basketball court in Sugar House Park and would be well used given
the growth in apartments and housing in Sugar House.
Fayette Avenue Improvements between Washington Street & 200 West
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
The public infrastructure on Fayette Avenue between 200 and 300 West is not at minimum
standard for Salt Lake City. The proposed project includes improvements on unimproved City-
owned parcels on the south side of Fayette Avenue as well as sidewalk, curb, and gutter
installation on the north side of Fayette Avenue. Proposed improvements on the south side of
Fayette include completion of paved parking area and installation of curb, gutter,
sidewalk/pedestrian walkway, street trees, landscaping, and street lighting on both sides of
Fayette Avenue. This project is located in an area zoned FBUN-2 and is intended to be a
walkable community. Located within 0.25 mile of the 900 South TRAX stop, sidewalk, curb,
and gutter should be present to support walkability.
It is intended that the City's funding for this project could be a "match" for a TIF project with
UDOT to generally improve the south side of Fayette Avenue from 200 West to 300 West,
including improvement and re-uses of UDOT property in the area to improve the neighborhood
aesthetics and public safety while addressing walkability, park and open space, and parking
issues in the neighborhood. UDOT has indicated a willingness to be a partner is making better
use of its parcels along Fayette Avenue and in the neighborhood generally.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 16
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 6,250,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 650,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
50
49 “Elevating Access”: The Regional Athletic Complex’s Blueprint for the Future
Public Lands Department
This project will plan, design, and ultimately construct two new, publicly-accessible fields at the
RAC, a northern parking lot at the RAC, and a new trail and landscaping along Rose Park Lane
(the main public entrance to the RAC). Other planning and design work would also be
completed, as described in Steps 1-3, below. The planning, design, and construction proposed in
this application will strongly position Public Lands to pursue remaining needed funding (for up
to six additional fields and other public amenities) from Salt Lake County’s next authorization
of the Zoo, Arts, and Parks (ZAP) Program, which could be available in 2025 or 2026. At this
expanded size (24 total fields), the RAC would be able to host larger tier events and bring in
vastly more visitors and economic impact potential. The economic impact of the RAC would
also increase by up to 100% (est.), from $15 to $19 million each year (currently) to up to $25 to
$30 million.
1. Rose Park Lane Trail Improvements and Beautification design and construction, irrigation
upgrades, and landscaping
2. Planning, Engagement, and Design for the Remaining, Undeveloped 30 Acres of the RAC and
the 3.6-acre Rose Park Lane Open Space Property
3. Phase 1 RAC Construction: Construction of the first phase of improvements identified in the
sitewide plan (Step 2, above), which will include two new fields open for public use, walkways,
and the northern parking lot.
SLC Public Safety Building (Police Occupancy) Remodels
Police Department
This project focuses on overhauling six office spaces within the Public Safety Building (PSB) to
amplify functionality, security, and overall efficiency tailored for the police department's needs.
GSBS provided a detailed quote that outlines each room's scope, such as the removal and
installation of specific elements like flooring, millwork adjustments, and cabinetry finishing will
be executed with precision. The extensive remodel of the six office spaces within the PSB is
designed to facilitate both immediate function and future growth, seamlessly integrating
modern design elements and infrastructure upgrades to optimize operational efficiency and
adaptability for the police department.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 17
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 350,000$
CDCIP 350,000$ 350,000$
MAYOR 350,000$ 350,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 512,696$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 347,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
54
53
52
51 Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
“Free the Game” is a SLC-based non-profit on a mission to make soccer (the world's game)
more accessible to all. Over the years, soccer has become more of a business than a game -
requiring you to play for a club or a team to be able to play. Around the world, the game is
played in neighborhood parks and features low-maintenance materials like chain link fencing
and concrete. This proposal may convert unutilized or underutilized concrete courts (or add
new concrete pads) at several of the following parks in Salt Lake City into “futsal” or street
soccer courts. Salt Lake City funding would be a 50% match for private funding from “Free the
Game”.
Proposed locations:
Jordan Park (1060 South 900 West)
9th South River Park (1000 West Gennessee Avenue)
Liberty Park (600 East 900 South), dependent on Historic Landmark Commission approval
11th Avenue Park (581 North Terrace Hills Drive)
Jefferson Park (1084 South West Temple)
Fairmont Park (1040 East Sugarmont Avenue)
Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation
Engineering Division
This annual program funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated City alleyways,
including pavement and drainage improvements, as necessary.
International Peace Gardens
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
First, building a security fence around the gardens to protect the artwork and structures.
Second, we would add educational kiosks at the entrances and provide informational panels at
each countries' garden that would contain details of that countries people, culture, and
involvement in peace. The International Peace Gardens located at 1160 Dalton Ave S, SLC, were
conceived in 1939 but due to World War II were dedicated in 1952. Twenty-eight countries
from the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia are represented, symbolizing the true spirit of
democracy and world peace, history, literature, and many lands' cultural heritage. Recently, due
to vandalisms and theft, some of the remaining statues and artwork have been removed and put
in storage. The Salt Lake City Arts Council is working to restore and/or replace art pieces that
can be returned to the gardens.
1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk and repave street
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west side of road
on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave and repave 1200 E between Crandall Ave
and Zeith Ave.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 18
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 2,400,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 145,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 69,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
55
Playground Shade
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Install shade clothes over up to five existing playgrounds. In the summer, playground
equipment is too hot to use by 10am. By providing shade to the existing playgrounds, the
community will enjoy increased use of all play equipment for the full day in the summer. Shade
clothes will also help with the prevention of skin cancer.
The playgrounds selected, based on solar exposure, usage during the day, and feasibility, at
which shade clothes and structures could be added may be (in no order): Fairmont Park, Poplar
Grove Park, Wasatch Hollow Park, Westpointe Park, and Donner Trail Park.
First Encampment Park
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Our current goals for this request include repairing the engraved pioneer names that are
eroding from the rocks and correcting where needed to ensure historical accuracy; replacing
damaged monuments & adding context about the contributions of those who helped create the
park; adding QR codes on new signage to make additional historical information readily
accessible online; improving drainage in the dry 'riverbed' to reduce standing water issues that
attract mosquitoes & could prove deadly to human life; adding lighting for safety & other
systems to discourage criminal activity that many green spaces are struggling with; upgrading
the sprinkler system to reduce water waste & rock erosion; removing invasive plant species &
replanting water-wise vegetation while maintaining sight-lines & visibility within the park.
These CIP improvements could help facilitate creating curriculum for field trips & outdoor
classroom resources; working with Park Rangers to share historical information & connecting
with other Salt Lake Parks with historic significance, like Donner Park, as we work to 'Sustain
our Stories' .
Alley Improvement A798
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Residential alley improvement project at approximately 521 East Driggs Avenue.
58
57
56
700 East Median Tree Planting Project
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
Create a boulevard of trees on 700 E between 1300 S and 2100 S similar to the existing
boulevard of trees on 700 E between 900 S and 1300 E (across from Liberty Park). Just for
clarity the project is NOT referring to the trees on the park strip, it's to create a boulevard of
trees in the existing median between the two directions of traffic. The median is currently made
of asphalt and this project proposes to replace the asphalt with a boulevard of trees. The
benefits of this tree planting initiative are multifold and are outlined below:
i) Median will create safer flow of traffic in this very busy road and prevent road accidents
such as the recent one involving students from Hawthorne Elementary School.
ii) Provide shade and reduce the heat island effect along this huge area of asphalt.
iii) Contain air pollution and noise pollution in this busy road within the city limits.
iv) Add aesthetic appeal to businesses, schools and residential areas along this road and
contribute to positive economic impact along this road.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 19
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 477,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Westminster Urban Forestry and Traffic Calming Measures
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
This project aims to reduce traffic in the Westminster Neighborhood of Salt Lake City, and
expand urban forestry efforts in Sugarhouse. It is made up of two basic parts:
1. A study of (1) existing conditions, constraints, and opportunities, and (2) infrastructure and
programmatic recommendations, including the most effective, cost-efficient, and community-
supported methods of improving neighborhood street livability and expanding urban forestry.
This study may also include a series of tests of the recommendations.
2. Design and construction, or implementation, of the above recommendations in the defined
project area.
Harvey Milk Blvd LGBTQ+ and Neighborhood Visibility
Constituent Application; Arts Council
This application is being brought forward on behalf of Equality Utah, East Liberty Park
Community Organization, and Central 9th Community Council. The request would include the
following installations:
23 bike racks from 400 W. to 1300 E. at gathering places on each block along the street, with 3
additional racks placed in high-demand bike parking areas.
15 Benches installed along both sides of the street in the heart of the four business districts.
1000 E to 800 E, 400 E to 300 E, and West Temple to 400 W.
27 Banner arms would be placed in the heart of the four business districts. They would be
placed along both sides of the street. from 1000 E to 800 E, 400 E to 300 E, and West Temple
to 400 W. (The banners will be funded privately.)
3 Placemaking stand-alone art installations incorporating education about Harvey Milk, the
LGBTQ+ Civil Rights movement, and the LGBTQ+ community in Salt Lake City and Utah. On
city property near the street by Liberty Park, overhead in the Liberty Wells Neighborhood
between State Street and 200 East, and in the parking median between West Temple and 300
W in the Central 9th Neighborhood.
60
59
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 20
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 75,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 134,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 75,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
63
62
61 200 E 1910 S Public Art
Constituent Application; Arts Council
Public Art at the intersection of 200 E 1910 S. There is an 'island' of cement to split the lanes.
Bushes/trees and weeds have grown in the cracks. It looks terrible and has so for years. The
bushes accumulate garbage from people cleaning their cars or getting rid of a used baby diaper.
The bushes are so big that someone could hide in/behind which is a public safety concern. I
would like to see if this spot can be approved for public art.
Alleyways between Sherman/Harrison and Harrison/Browning
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
This project is intended to activate/adopt/improve the alleyways on the east side of 1100 East
between Sherman/Harrison and Harrison/Browning. There are several important community
centered small businesses combined with rental properties and home owners all of whom
border on these alleyways. These businesses and residents use the alleyways in order to avoid
the use of 1100 East. The alleyways are used for through access leading to the back entries of
these businesses and residences on 1100 East, Harrison Ave, Sherman and Browning. Residents
and businesses contract with snow removal services in the winter to allow free and safe traffic
to the businesses. The project will also facilitate the natural extension of the McClelland bicycle
trail so that cyclists can avoid the redesigned intersection of Harrison and 1100 East. The
alleyways are used regularly by constituents in the neighborhood for walking dogs and general
exercise.
Jackson Park Art
Constituent Application; Arts Council
Bring art to Jackson Park, an overlooked neighborhood gem in need of investment. Our
neighborhood is historically underserved and currently experiences serious crime, safety, and
health issues with our parks. With these issues hampering utilization of Westside parks,
Jackson's central location offers rare, walkable access. As the only accessible green space for
residents between major roadways and barriers, art here would promote health, invite play, and
show that Jackson Park matters. With highway expansions, elementary schools closing, and
this area hard hit with air quality issues, we need more than ever parks that are cared for. High-
quality, interactive art would go a long way to signal to the community that this is a fun, safe,
well-maintained park that you can feel comfortable bringing your children to.
1. A large sculpture or piece that can easily be interacted with by both kids and adults.
Something can be climbed on my kids and adults and/or have an interactable music or kinetic
element.
2. The sculpture to be memorable. Something on par with the Cats at Steinblick.
3. Animal motif to complement both the neighborhoods lived experienced with wildlife and the
theme of Steinbleck Park's Cat statues.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 21
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 330,000$
CDCIP 330,000$ 330,000$
MAYOR 330,000$ 330,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 174,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 55,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Fairpark placemaking signage
Constituent Application; Engineering Division
Fairpark Community Council would like to have signage for our neighborhood. Similar to Rose
Park and 9th & 9th -- cement base with metal cut out. We take great pride in our community
and would like others to know which neighborhood they are visiting!
Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Utilize this underutilized and unprogrammed small, city owned parcel more fully by creating a
pocket park and installing a playground on it. Proximity to residential areas, high concentration
of single family homes, and underutilized functionality make this a logical space for recreation
and community gathering. Many master plans overlap with this project area and initial input
from the community has been overwhelmingly positive. While protecting current trees and
vegetation, community members would like to see an engaging play structure, seating area,
garbage can, and signage.
800 East Parks and Pathway
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
From South Temple extending southward to 900 S, 800 E is a two lane, low speed road with
intermittent grassy medians separating the two lanes of traffic traveling in different directions.
These planted medians add visual appeal but are otherwise unused space in a densely populated
area and have potential to further serve the community. This project proposes designing the
transformation of these planted medians on 800 E into usable public spaces by turning them
into mini-parks with a two-way multi-use path that extends down the middle connecting all
these medians/mini parks from South Temple to 900 S. This project would align with and
extend the project already in progress to turn 800 E from 800 S to 2700 S into a neighborhood
byway. The already existing planted medians on 800 E north of 900 S and this neighborhood
byway in progress present a unique opportunity to use this green space to extend this byway
and add amenities like small park spaces. Turning the grassy medians on 800 E into park
spaces would entail some infrastructure modifications and some addition of amenities.
Lowering the curb at the north and south edges of each median to allow access to the park
spaces and multi-use path would be essential. Benches could be added along with a few small
pieces of playground equipment, and space could be dedicated for a small community garden.
The multi-use path would also need to be created with gravel or pavement.
66
65
64
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 22
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 86,200$
CDCIP 86,200$ 86,200$
MAYOR 86,200$ 86,200$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 280,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 50,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Building a calisthenics/fitness area within the confines of Salt Lake City's Liberty Park (District
5), dependent on Historic Landmark Commission approval. As alternative options, I would
propose Pioneer Park (District 4), Sugar House Park (District 7) and Jordan Park (District 2)
are also centrally located and heavily utilized by the public. Salt Lake City Public Lands staff
have added several other possible alternatives: Riverside Park, Poplar Grove Park, Jefferson
Park, and Westpointe Park.
The proposal is to devote 900-1500 square feet within the park to an area where 12-20 patrons
could utilize cemented/in-place calisthenic bars, and potentially weight equipment, who
currently enjoy the park, or would prospectively. To provide everyone with an equal and free
opportunity for strength fitness, and another option for the community. As the city continues to
grow in size and diversity, and with continued challenges associated with economic and
healthcare inequity, this project will be an extension and evolution to activities already
provided, with the hope of forwarding community and social progress for all.
Liberty Wells Community Garden
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
The Liberty Wells Community Council would like to convert an underutilized piece of UDOT
property located on 700 East (west side) at approximately 1800 South to a community garden.
LWCC already leases the property across the street and to the south from the State for our
'shed', that we use for storage for the numerous events we hold during the year. This new piece
of property is already maintained by SLC. SLC has a contract with the State which I believe is
pretty much mowing it to keep the weeds down. I have spoken to the State about this and they
have no problem with the concept and indicated that they would donate any surplus materials
we might need like fencing. I have also spoken with Wasatch Community Gardens about
managing it once it has been built. This parcel would make a superb garden. It has no trees on it
so it would be in the sun during most of daylight hours unlike many community gardens
including another LWCC community garden located on 1700 South and 700 East which has
several large trees on it.
Drop Arm Gate on the Entry to the Rear Parking Lot
Police Department
The East parking lot at the PSB is consistently occupied by apartment tenants despite numerous
efforts to alleviate the issue. To establish better control and ensure appropriate use of the space,
a cost-effective solution would be to install a drop arm. Drop arms are recognized for their
effectiveness in regulating access to parking areas, providing a simple yet efficient mechanism
to manage entry and exit, thereby addressing the current occupancy challenges.
69
68
67
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 23
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 50,000$
CDCIP 50,000$ 50,000$
MAYOR 50,000$ 50,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 95,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 200,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR -$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 30,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 30,000$ 30,000$
COUNCIL -$
Sugar House Map and Historic Recognition Project
Constituent Application; Transportation Division
The Sugar House Map and Historic Recognition Project. A series of metal maps throughout the
district to identify open spaces, trails, historic landmarks, public property, and retail space.
Includes a QR code to link to Sugar House Business Community.
East Bench H Rock Preserve
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
In recent years, the H-Rock and its surrounding slopes have seen significant damage and soil
erosion from unmanaged visitation and expanding vandalism. The hundreds of gallons of paint
from over the years have leached into surrounding soils and vegetation. The "H" - as well as all
other sides of the rock - repeatedly get vandalized with graffiti, profanity, and even hate speech.
Numerous user-created access trails spoke out from the H-Rock expanding the degradation of
the open space. In meetings this fall with Highland student council officers, the school
principal, and the Division of Trails & Natural Lands staff, there was a consensus of mutual
concern regarding student safety and environmental abuse. This project proposal includes
environmental clean-up and landscape repair, trail and open space restoration, and the addition
of trail-related amenities such as fencing, signage, and benches. TNL staff has already started
working with the Highland community to protect its connection to this space and to design and
implement a new H-Rock tradition that does not sacrifice student safety or the natural
environment.
Historic Markers
Mayor's Office
Note: This was added after the CDCIP Board had completed their deliberations and funding
recommendations
Additional one-time funding for creating and installing metal historic markers around the City
to highlight underrepresented communities and equity. The City's Human Rights Commission
and Racial Equity in Policing Commission could provide site selection prioritization feedback.
Potential sites could include Japantown, Plum Alley, Greektown, Radio City Lounge as the
oldest gay bar west of the Mississippi, and Seraph Young casting the first vote by a woman in a
US election, among others.
73
72
71
5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)
Constituent Application; Public Lands Department
Install tables and chairs/seats to facilitate face-to-face meetings - conversations. Tables would
make it possible to eat, play games, with others. We need a way to foster community. This might
be a low cost first step. I suggest we start with the area about 150 South 500 West. The area is
under trees but has a pronounced slope. Some grading may be required. The tables will be
installed in the park blocks along 500 West, between 50 North and 500 South. The concrete
picnic tables will be placed on hard surface paving and will not require bolting. The exact
product chosen may differ from what is displayed below.
70
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 24
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 750,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 750,000$ 750,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 350,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 350,000$ 350,000$
COUNCIL -$
Concrete Replacement
Engineering Division
Note: This was added after the CDCIP Board had completed their deliberations and funding
recommendations
This one-time City funded project addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks in the
public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement.
74
75 Planning and Design for Future CIP Applications
Available to Any Department / Division
Note: This was added after the CDCIP Board had completed their deliberations and funding
recommendations
These funds would be used to create design documents and refined cost estimates for future
CIP applications. The Administration stated the the funds would likely be used by the Public
Services' Department's Architectural Services Group such as for building reconfigurations and
renovations, and the Transportation Division which provided the below list of potential
projects.
1) Operationalize the newly adopted Citywide Transportation Plan (Connect SLC), which entails
hiring a research fellow or consulting firm to review all city code, standards, policies, and
processes for consistency, then recommend changes, updates, and new elements. Est $180-
500K. If funded, we've identified opportunities to pursue grant funds.
2) Concept Reports: develop preliminary designs and cost estimates for projects on the 10-year
Capital Improvement Plan. Est annual need is $300K, can use as little as $50K.
3) Multimodal Traffic Control: supplement the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD) with more nuanced/detailed standards that better address active transportation and
transit. Est. $30-50K.
4) Vision Zero: "near-miss" software to detect and analyze collision close calls. Also scalable.
Pilot for as little as est. $250K.
5) Neighborhood Byways Implementation Plan: similar to Livable Streets, a guiding document
with a methodology for prioritizing neighborhood byways and coordinating them with other
City plans and projects. Est. $30-50K through on-call.
6) Update Ped & Bike Master Plan: Est. $50-100K.
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 25
FOF Streets Class C
(gas tax)
1/4 ¢
Sales Tax
FOF
Transit
Transportation Dedicated Sources Capital
Maintenance
(Holding Acct)
#Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals
Parks
Impact
Fees
General
Fund
FOF
Other
REQUEST 500,000$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST -$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 223,171$ 223,171$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST -$
CDCIP -$
MAYOR 167,378$ 167,378$
COUNCIL -$
REQUEST 92,020,096$
CDCIP 25,046,200$ 7,300,000$ 1,100,000$ 3,146,200$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 3,500,000$ 8,000,000$ -$
MAYOR 42,799,839$ 8,570,549$ 1,154,490$ 3,824,800$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,250,000$ 8,000,000$ 15,000,000$
COUNCIL -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
8,820,549$ 1,154,490$ 3,824,800$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 4,250,000$ 8,000,000$ 15,000,000$
76 Vacant and Leased City-owned Property Maintenance
Real Estate Services Division
77 Cost Overrun Account
Finance Department
Funding set aside annually to cover unforeseen costs of projects per the Council's adopted CIP
policies resolution. The current balance of the Cost Overrun Account is $937,233.
TOTALS
78 1.5% for Art
Arts Council
Funding set aside annually to provide public art at City developed projects per Salt Lake City
Code.
COUNCIL AVAILABLE TO SPEND
Attachment 2 - Fiscal Year 2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Long Funding Log
Last Updated July 2, 2024 Page 26
Mayor’s
Recommended
Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MESSAGES Page:
MAYOR’S MESSAGE 5
SALT LAKE CITY PROFILE
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION ORGANIZATION 9
SALT LAKE CITY AT A GLANCE 11
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY PROFILE 14
SALT LAKE CITY BUDGET-IN-BRIEF 18
MAYOR’S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
BUDGET SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35
FY 2024-25 CAPITAL AND OPERATING BUDGET 41
GENERAL FUND KEY CHANGES 53
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES 64
LBA KEY CHANGES 79
RDA KEY CHANGES 80
MULTI-AGENCY DRUG TASK FORCE KEY CHANGES 91
FINANCIAL POLICIES
DEBT POLICIES 95
DEBT STRUCTURE 98
REVENUE 102
FY 2023-24 LEGISLATIVE INTENTS 122
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OVERVIEW 135
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2024-25 PROJECTS LIST 141
DEPARTMENT BUDGETS
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL 151
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 155
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 159
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 165
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS 171
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 177
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 183
FIRE DEPARTMENT 189
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES 195
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES 201
JUSTICE COURT 209
POLICE DEPARTMENT 214
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS 221
Table of Contents
1 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES 227
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 235
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 241
DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY 245
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 251
NON-DEPARTMENTAL 255
STAFFING DOCUMENT
STAFFING DOCUMENT INTRODUCTION 265
STAFFING DOCUMENT SUMMARY 267
STAFFING DOCUMENT DETAIL 267
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A: LIBRARY 317
APPENDIX B: HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS & RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 333
Table of Contents
2 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Mayor’s Message
This page intentionally left blank
Dear Salt Lake City,
I’m excited and grateful to serve as your mayor. Great opportunities continue to
approach us at a quickened pace. The new trail we are breaking will have lasting,
generational impacts on Salt Lakers’ quality of life. It’s an honor to listen to residents
and collaborate with partners to reach promising vistas in our City that we once could
only hope for.
Our highest priorities in the Fiscal Year 2025 budget reflect what we’ve heard residents
need during this period of growth: continuing to bolster our City’s affordable housing
stock, investing in more open space and public lands, improving walkability, and
continuing changes that have made our public spaces and neighborhoods safer for
families.
What follows is a responsible budget that addresses our residents' needs and requests
and paves the way for a future filled with opportunities to benefit all Salt Lakers.
This fiscally responsible budget focuses on my administration’s priorities:
a.Livability for residents and families
b.Resiliency
c.Capital Projects
d.Organizational efficiency and well-being
I must express my appreciation for this year’s budget committee for their diligent work
in producing a budget that reflects our shared goals and the future we envision for Salt
Lake City and is balanced and responsive to your needs.
Thank you, Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, Greg Cleary, Budget
Director, and the entire Finance Department; as well as Chief Equity Officer Damian
Choi; Chief Human Resources Officer Debra Alexander; Community and
Neighborhoods Director Blake Thomas; Chief Mike Brown; Public Utilities Director
Laura Briefer; City Attorney Katie Lewis; Chief Administrative Officer Jill Love; and
Chief Information Officer Aaron Bentley for their collaborative efforts.
Sincerely,
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
Salt Lake City Mayor's Message
5 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Mayor's Message
6 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City
Profile
This page intentionally left blank
SALT LAKE CITY ELECTED OFFICIALS
Fiscal Year 2024-25
MAYOR
Erin Mendenhall
CITY COUNCIL
Victoria Petro
(Chair)
District 1
Alejandro Puy
District 2
Chris Wharton
(Vice Chair)
District 3
Eva Lopez Chavez
District 4
Darin Mano
District 5
Dan Dugan
District 6
Sarah Young
District 7
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
9 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
10 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY AT A GLANCE
177 YEARS 173 YEARS
Date Founded
July 24, 1847
Date Incorporated
January 19, 1851
MAYOR COUNCIL 111.1 SQ. MILES
Form of Government Since 1980 Total City Area
204,657 4,327 FT.
2022 Estimated Population Average Elevation (1,319 Meters)
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
11 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
52.1˚F
(11.2 C) MEAN
28.2˚F
(-1.6 C) January
77.0˚F
(25.0 C) JULY
Average Daily Temperatures
58.5 INCHES
(1,486 MM)
16.5 INCHES
(419 MM)
Average Annual Snowfall Average Annual Rainfall
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
12 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS
MAP LEGEND
DISTRICT 1:Victoria Petro DISTRICT 5: Darin Mano
DISTRICT 2: Alejandro Puy DISTRICT 6: Dan Dugan
DISTRICT 3: Chris Wharton DISTRICT 7: Sarah Young
DISTRICT 4: Eva Lopez Chavez
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
13 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CALENDAR
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
14 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
$1,973,381,550
RECOMMENDED BUDGET FY 2025
6.6%
INCREASE
* Redevelopment Agency Included in the Other Enterprise Fund Amount.
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
15 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
16 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
$475,245,078
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
6.3%
INCREASE
GENERAL FUND REVENUE BY TYPE FY 2025
24%Property Taxes with
Pilot 6%Interfund
Reimbursement
37%Sales & Use Taxes 1%Intergovernmental
3%Franchise Taxes 1%Charges & Fees
8%Licenses & Permits 1%Fines
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
17 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Budget-in-Brief
Salt Lake City’s budget is comprised of several different types of funds,
including the General Fund, Enterprise Funds, and Internal Service Funds.
Enterprise funds, unlike the General Fund, are not supported by property
or sales taxes. Revenues in these funds come primarily from fees charged
for services provided. For instance, the Airport derives a large portion of its
revenues from landing fees while Public Utilities receives revenue from
water and sewer services.
The City also has a number of internal service funds such as Fleet and
Information Management Services. Internal service funds exist to account
for the financing of goods and services provided by one City agency or
department to another.
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
18 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
CITYWIDE EXPENDITURES
Fund Type FY 23 Adopted Budget FY 24 Adopted Budget
FY 25 Recommended Budget
Increase/ Decrease from FY 24 Adopted
Percent Change
General Fund 425,537,407 448,514,917 475,245,078 26,730,161 6.28%
Airport Enterprise Fund 384,681,671 520,438,997 576,395,097 55,956,100 14.55%
Public Utilities Enterprise Funds 413,124,942 508,778,032 553,114,955 44,336,923 10.73%
Other Enterprise Funds 128,758,874 137,218,660 136,574,724 (643,936)(0.50)%
Internal Service Funds 118,806,965 138,145,589 137,517,819 (627,770)(0.53)%
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funds 35,460,387 29,708,286 32,322,843 2,614,557 7.37%
All Other Funds 83,363,494 65,516,043 62,211,034 (3,305,009)(3.96)%
Total 1,589,733,740 1,848,320,524 1,973,381,550 125,061,026 7.87%
FY 2023 AND 2024 ADOPTED BUDGETS AND FY 2025 RECOMMENDED BUDGET
FY 23 Adopted Budget FY 24 Adopted Budget FY 25 Recommended Budget
General Fund Airport
Enterprise
Fund
Public
Utilities
Enterprise
Funds
Other
Enterprise
Funds*
Internal
Service Funds
Capital
Improvement
Program (CIP)
Fund
All Other
Funds
0
100,000,000
200,000,000
300,000,000
400,000,000
500,000,000
600,000,000
700,000,000
800,000,000
* Redevelopment Agency Included in the Other Enterprise Fund Amount.
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
19 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
General Fund Departments FY 23 Adopted Budget FY 24 Adopted Budget
FY 25 Recommended Budget
Increase/ Decrease from FY 24 Adopted
Percentage Change
Economic Development 3,695,620 4,425,091 4,809,183 384,092 8.68%
Human Resources 4,236,836 4,659,300 5,059,723 400,423 8.59%
Justice Courts 5,199,660 5,489,720 5,958,110 468,390 8.53%
Council Office 5,387,707 5,610,149 6,289,340 679,191 12.11%
Mayor's Office 6,625,451 6,820,067 7,366,396 546,329 8.01%
Attorney's Office 9,007,633 10,490,844 12,881,528 2,390,684 22.79%
Finance Department 10,709,847 12,168,296 12,963,889 795,593 6.54%
911 Communications Bureau 10,872,140 11,259,756 11,610,306 350,550 3.11%
Public Lands 24,229,676 27,295,271 29,716,013 2,420,742 8.87%
Community & Neighborhoods 29,311,147 33,143,161 34,709,138 1,565,977 4.72%
Public Services 39,398,484 43,449,292 46,261,468 2,812,176 6.47%
Fire Department 48,586,492 52,264,357 54,549,009 2,284,652 4.37%
Police Department 103,977,042 110,976,812.49 120,001,456 9,024,644 8.13%
Non Departmental 124,299,673 120,462,801.4 123,069,522 2,606,721 2.16%
Total 425,537,408 448,514,918 475,245,078 26,730,164 5.96%
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
20 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
4,425,091
4,809,183
4,659,300
5,059,723
5,489,720
5,958,110
5,610,149
6,289,340
6,820,067
7,366,396
10,490,844
12,881,528
12,168,296
12,963,889
11,259,756
11,610,306
27,295,271
29,716,013
33,143,161
34,709,138
43,449,292
46,261,468
52,264,357
54,549,009
110,976,812.49
120,001,456
120,462,801.4
123,069,522
Economic Development
Human Resources
Council Office
Justice Courts
Mayor's Office
Attorney's Office
Finance Department
911 Communications Bureau
Public Lands
Community & Neighborhoods
Public Services
Fire Department
Police Department
Non Departmental
FY
2
4
A
d
o
p
t
e
d
B
u
d
g
e
t
FY
2
5
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
B
u
d
g
e
t
—25,000,000 50,000,000 75,000,000 100,000,000 125,000,000
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
21 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
22 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY TYPE - 2018-2025
FY 2018 Actuals FY 2019 Actuals FY 2020 Actuals FY 2021 Actuals FY 2022 Actuals FY 2023 Actuals FY 2024 Budget FY 2025 Budget
Property Taxes w/ PILOT 90,414,308 94,654,243 99,342,715 99,474,985 103,862,288 113,256,864 116,207,713 116,996,349
Sales and Use Taxes 67,940,454 99,403,846 116,199,002 122,654,953 160,262,167 172,197,395 166,213,479 177,400,679
Franchise Taxes 28,418,423 27,238,435 26,863,146 23,952,168 11,750,309 12,756,596 12,348,127 14,450,000
Licenses & Permits 30,608,768 36,960,240 32,637,293 36,428,067 43,313,623 43,946,412 40,878,104 38,989,244
Fines & Forfeitures 5,567,814 3,316,215 3,753,706 3,539,471 3,717,871 3,519,427 4,063,548 4,435,035
Intergovernmental 5,791,774 6,066,496 5,086,254 4,781,753 5,960,591 5,936,546 5,134,621 5,954,017
Charges & Fees 5,671,710 5,573,679 4,283,760 4,842,902 5,840,601 5,811,594 4,881,922 6,886,114
Parking 3,404,582 3,509,898 2,771,331 1,915,888 2,997,333 2,616,322 2,801,089 2,701,331
Other Revenue 39,643,865 38,231,125 49,561,874 51,980,733 91,840,076 135,320,383 95,986,315 107,432,309
Total Operating Revenue 277,461,698 314,954,177 340,499,081 349,570,920 429,544,859 495,361,539 448,514,918 475,245,078
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
23 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY TYPE
2018–2025
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Property Taxes w/ PILOT Sales and Use Taxes Franchise Taxes
Licenses & Permits Fines & Forfeitures Intergovernmental
Charges & Fees Parking Other Revenue
FY 2018
Actuals
FY 2019
Actuals
FY 2020
Actuals
FY 2021
Actuals
FY 2022
Actuals
FY 2023
Actuals
FY 2024 Budget FY 2025 Budget
This stacked bar graph depicts the
various types of revenue collected
for the Salt Lake City General Fund
and how some of these revenues
have fluctuated over the years. It
is worth noting that sales tax
revenues have increased markedly
starting in FY 2019 due to the
implementation of Funding Our
Future 0.5% increase in Salt Lake
City’s sales tax rate. The Other
Revenue category has been
impacted by American Recovery
Act grant funds.
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
24 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND REVENUE - FY 2024 ADOPTED V. 2025 REC'D BUDGETS
General Fund Revenue FY 2024 Adopted Budget FY 2025 Rec'd Budget Increase/ Decrease Percentage Change
Property Tax 114,302,140 114,923,082 620,942 0.54%
RDA Related Property Tax 15,545,000 19,220,752 3,675,752 23.65%
Sales and Use Tax 166,213,479 177,400,679 11,187,200 6.73%
Franchise Tax 12,348,127 14,450,000 2,101,873 17.02%
Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,905,573 2,073,267 167,694 8.80%
Intergovernmental Revenue 5,134,621 5,954,017 819,396 15.96%
Charges, Fees and Rentals 5,690,001 6,886,114 1,196,113 21.02%
Other Revenue 68,375,964 89,562,654 21,186,690 30.99%
Interfund Transfers In 26,131,213 5,495,833 -20,635,380 (78.97)%
Available Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 32,868,799 39,278,680 6,409,881 19.50%
Total 448,514,917 475,245,078 26,730,161 5.96%
FY 2025 GF Revenue
Property Tax
114,923,082
RDA Related Property Tax
19,220,752
Sales and Use Tax
177,400,679
Franchise Tax
14,450,000
Charges for Services
6,886,114
Other Revenue
89,562,654
Available Fund Balance/
Cash Reserves
39,278,680
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
25 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Fiscal Year 2025
37%24%14%8%
Sales Use & Taxes Property Taxes Other Revenue Licenses and
Permits
8%4%3%1%
Available Fund
Balance // Cash
Reserves
RDA Related
Property Tax
Franchise Taxes Intergovernmental
1%
Charges for Service
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
26 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Property Tax Rates
in Salt Lake City
According to Utah State Code,
municipalities cannot assess
properties for more property tax
revenue than was generated in the
previous year, with the exception of
new growth. As property values generally
increase or decrease, property tax rates
fluctuate accordingly. The accompanying
graph (on the right) demonstrates how
the boom in property values in the City
affected the property tax rates that were
assessed during the earlier years shown
on the table above. It is also apparent in
recent years as well.
HISTORY OF TOTAL PROPERTY TAX RATE
(2013-2024)
FY
2
0
1
3
FY
2
0
1
4
FY
2
0
1
5
FY
2
0
1
6
FY
2
0
1
7
FY
2
0
1
8
FY
2
0
1
9
FY
2
0
2
0
FY
2
0
2
1
FY
2
0
2
2
FY
2
0
2
3
FY
2
0
2
4
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
0.0045
0.0050
0.0055
0.0060
General Operations Interest & Sinking Fund Library Total
FY 2013 0.003574 0.001097 0.000846 0.005517
FY 2014 0.003465 0.001064 0.00082 0.005349
FY 2015 0.003787 0.001066 0.000783 0.005636
FY 2016 0.003619 0.000989 0.000747 0.005355
FY 2017 0.003617 0.000941 0.000705 0.005263
FY 2018 0.003482 0.000772 0.00083 0.005084
FY 2019 0.003285 0.000692 0.000791 0.004768
FY 2020 0.003205 0.000648 0.000741 0.004594
FY 2021 0.002942 0.000713 0.000683 0.004338
FY 2022 0.002868 0.000556 0.000652 0.004076
FY 2023 0.002698 0.00046 0.000618 0.003776
FY 2024 0.002456 0.00042 0.00071 0.003586
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
28 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Sales Tax Revenues
in Salt Lake City
The table to the right demonstrates a
steady increase in sales tax revenues
in Salt Lake City over the past several
years. A sharp increase came with
the implementation of the
additional one-half-percent sales
tax increase that is used for
funding our future. The drop in
revenue from FY2020 to FY2021 was
the result of the economic downturn
brought on by the COVID 19
pandemic. In FY2022, sales and use
tax revenues rebounded as the
economy recovered. Further healthy
sales tax growth is expected in
FY2025.
Fiscal Year Sales & Use Tax Receipts % Increase
FY 2014 Actual 55,380,938 2.98%
FY 2015 Actual 57,873,243 4.50%
FY 2016 Actual 59,927,247 3.55%
FY 2017 Actual 62,776,248 4.75%
FY 2018 Actual 67,940,454 8.23%
FY 2019 Actual 99,403,846 46.31%
FY 2020 Actual 116,199,002 16.90%
FY 2021 Actual 122,654,953 5.56%
FY 2022 Actual 160,262,167 30.66%
FY 2023 Actual 172,197,395 (6.77)%
FY 2024 Budget 166,213,479 11.24%
FY 2025 Budget 177,400,679 11.63%
Average Increase 12.41%
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
29 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
RELATED ORDINANCE CHANGES AND OTHER BUDGETARY ACTIONS
2024-25
REVENUE RELATED ORDINANCES
Consolidated Fee
Schedule Adoption and
Changes
An ordinance amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to
modify various fees included therein in accordance with the changes
presented in the budget. The changes include adjustments to the CPI;
Water, Sewer and Storm Water rates; Amending delivery of Business
Licensing Documents; and change in Refuse rates.
Budget Adoption
An ordinance adopting the City budget, excluding the budget for the
Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing
document of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
Budget Adoption of
the Salt Lake City
Library
An ordinance adopting the budget and staffing document for the
Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
Tax Rate of Salt Lake City
and the City Library,
including the Judgement
Levy
An ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the
Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City
made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
Adopting the Mayor’s
Recommended Budget as
the Tentative Budget of
Salt Lake City
An ordinance adopting the Tentative Budgets of Salt Lake City, including
the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
BUDGET RESOLUTIONS
Budget Adoption of the
Local Building Authority
(LBA)
A resolution adopting the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of
the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
Adopting the Mayor’s
Recommended Budget
as the Tentative
Budget of the Local
Building Authority
A resolution adopting the Tentative Budgets for the Capital Projects
Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, for Fiscal Year
2024-25.
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
30 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Budget Adoption of
the Redevelopment
Agency (RDA)
A resolution adopting the final budget for the Redevelopment Agency of
Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
Adopting the Mayor’s
Recommended Budget as
the Tentative Budget of
the Redevelopment
Agency of Salt Lake City
A resolution adopting the Tentative Budgets of the Redevelopment Agency
of Salt Lake City, for Fiscal Year 2024-25.
HUMAN RESOURCES ISSUES
Compensation Plan
Ordinances
Ordinances adopting the compensation plan as ordinance for all
appointed and non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.
Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU)
Adoption Ordinance(s)
Ordinance(s) approving the Memorandum of Understanding(s) and
wage agreements between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American
Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Local 1004; the
International Police Association’s Local 75; and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81.
Salt Lake City Budget-in-Brief
31 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Mayor’s
Recommended
Budget
This page intentionally left blank
Budget Summary
As the City began planning for fiscal year 2025, a three-year plan was developed to
move the City forward. As part of this three-year plan, the City considered the
influx of one-time funding and the immediate help those funds provided against
the ongoing needs the use of those funds created. The budget would need to plan
not only for ongoing costs to provide services, but for future costs to maintain the
resources and staff paid for with the one-time revenues. Transitioning ongoing
costs paid for with one-time revenues to ongoing revenue streams is the goal of
the three-year plan.
The challenge facing the City was not about immediate funding options but about
creating ongoing revenue streams to meet the future needs of the City.
Salt Lake City has been experiencing strong growth in spite of the challenges of
the past few years. The City needs to continue to build and invest so future growth
will continue.
One positive ongoing revenue stream for the City has been sales tax. Sales tax
revenues over the past few years have performed much better than budget. Those
revenues have allowed the City to add to its fund balance and puts the City in a
sound position for the current year. The question that faced the mayor, her
administrative team, and the City budget committee was how to spend prudently
and continue establishing programs for the future of Salt Lake City.
The Mayor and her team looked at current revenues streams, one-time sources,
including the use of the City’s healthy fund balance, and potential new revenue
streams. The three-year outlook helped to provide a long-term strategy to carry
the City forward. The budget put forth today provides the City with a balance
between each of these options that will move the City forward to meet the
challenges that lie ahead.
The budget committee implemented a decision matrix to assist all departments in
comparing their insights. As the departments reviewed their insights, they were
asked to rate them based on different methods. The matrix looked at each City
service to determine why the City was performing it and whether there were
options to have the program provided through different means. It measured who
benefits from the program, with special consideration for those who have typically
been left behind in the past. It also looked at the process and outcome of adapting
to difficult or challenging incidents based on five criteria. Finally, the committee
considered whether the insight meets other goals as outlined by the Mayor for
2025, as well as the goals of the Council. The matrix allowed the budget committee
and the departments to have a broader view of each proposal and how programs
measured against each other.
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
35 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Because of this matrix, the initiatives brought forth in this budget have been
carefully weighed against the Mayor’s priorities of:
•Livability for residents and families
•Resiliency
•Capital Projects
•Organizational efficiency and well-being
The Mayor’s recommended budget provides a roadmap for Salt Lake City to
continue to grow and prosper. It has elements to take advantage of the economic
success of today and outlines a course to ensure the financial health of the City
going forward. This includes efforts to meet future needs for service through the
careful addition of needed personnel and the use of one-time funds to build
necessary resources to allow the City to continue to attract business and tourism
and provide services for its citizens.
REVENUES
Salt Lake City revenue across all funds for fiscal year 2025 are $2,045,216,014. This
represents an increase of 19.1% over fiscal year 2024 budgeted revenues. The
increase is the result of several sources. Sales tax revenue is a strong contributor
and the Airport continues to see growth in enplanements as well as retail
concessions. However, in an effort to maintain the continued growth, meet
regulatory requirements and other needs, the City will institute a rate increase at
Public Utilities and Refuse.
The largest contributors to City revenues are the Airport, Public Utilities and the
General Fund. Airport revenues are budgeted at $585.3 million while Public Utilities
total revenue across all funds is $628.3 million. The General Fund fiscal year 2025
budget is $475.2 million, including use of fund balance.
The City uses conservative revenue projections and maintains adequate reserves in
each fund to ensure long-term financial stability. For the general fund, Salt Lake
City creates its annual budget based on historical trend average of on-going
revenues. From these averages the City then projects future growth, one-time
revenues and potential new revenues to establish a final revenue projection. This
projection becomes the basis of the budget for the Mayor and administration to
create a balanced budget.
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
For fiscal year 2025, total general fund revenue increased by 5.96%. The increase is
associated with projected increases in property tax and sales and use tax, and the
use of $39.2 million of fund balance. For fiscal year 2025, the City projected
increases in interfund reimbursements and a slight increase in license revenue.
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
36 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The City has budgeted to use fund balance reserves to help cover projected
deficits. The budget uses $39.2 million of fund balance representing 8.26% of
General Fund revenue. While fund balance reserves were used, the City will still
maintain at least a projected 13% fund balance for fiscal year 2025.
Sales and use tax is budgeted to increase by $11.1 million. Other notable increases
in revenue are in interfund reimbursement, which is up $5.9 million and license
revenue, notably in airport parking and innkeepers tax, budgeted to increase by
$1.7 million.
There is a noteworthy decrease in permits revenue, which is down $3.6 million
due to high interest rates causing a slow down in construction.
EXPENSES
Total expense for Salt Lake City is budgeted at $1,973,381,550 across all funds. This
represents an increase of $122.1 million from last fiscal year, or a 6.6% increase.
The total budget for the General Fund is $475.2 million. The Airport budget is set at
$576.4 million, while Public Utilities is budgeted at $553.1 million.
The budget includes the addition of 62 full-time positions (FTEs) across all funds.
Staffing in the General Fund will increase by 32.5 FTEs while the Airport (25) and
IMS (1) also see staffing increases. 20 positions were previously added through
budget amendments during fiscal year 2024
GENERAL FUND EXPENSE
General Fund expense increased by $26.7 million an increase of 5.95% from fiscal
year 2024. Major changes to expense include salary, pension and benefit changes
totaling $298.9 million. The budget also includes the addition of 32.5 FTEs at an
anticipated cost of approximately $3.2 million.
Newly proposed positions include 2 FTE's to create an additional Community
Health Access Team. Public Lands staffing increased by 8 FTE's to assist with Parks
bond projects and parks maintenance. Public Services staffing increased by 8 FTEs:
2 FTEs to help with the completion of Parks projects, 3 for a new Rapid Intervention
Team, and 3 FTEs in the Engineering Division. The Police Department increased by
6 FTEs due to the expansion at the Airport. The 2.5 FTEs in Finance meet the
expanded needs as the City continues to grow.
Notable budgetary increases in the General Fund are contractual and inflationary
increases across all City Departments. The budget also includes continuation of
construction mitigation funding to assist businesses affected by City projects.
Funding is also included to ensure City IT resources are protected from external
threats, supporting enhancements to city emergency response dispatch systems.
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
37 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALARY, BENEFIT AND COMPENSATION COSTS
The largest portion of the general fund budget is personnel costs. The total cost for
compensation included in the general fund budget is $298.9 million. This
represents a 7.2% increase over fiscal year 2024. Personnel costs for the Airport
total $76.5 million, while Public Utilities personnel costs total $58.7 million.
Citywide personnel costs total $475.2 million as part of the Mayor's Recommended
Budget.
The Administration recommends funding for a 5% general base pay increase for all
employees, including AFSCME union. The distribution of actual employee pay
increases is subject to negotiations resulting in either tentative or previously
ratified agreements, according to the City’s Collective Bargaining Resolution. The
projected cost for these pay increases is approximately $8.4 million for the general
fund and $14.4 million across the City.
Although wage negotiations with Police and Fire Unions are on-going at the time,
the fiscal year 2025 recommended budget includes an amount necessary to fund a
5% general increase to the base wages for represented employees.
HEALTH INSURANCE
Salt Lake City continues to offer one medical plan this year: Summit STAR - a High
Deductible Health Plan (HDHP). The medical plan is administered through Public
Employees Health Plan (PEHP). This year the budget includes a small premium
increase of 3.66% to the Summit STAR plan. As before, the city will continue to pay
95% of the total Summit Star medical premium.
The city has realized significant savings - largely because of implementing the high
deductible health plan and front-loading half the annual deductible into a Health
Savings Account (HSA) for employees. The City HSA contribution will fund one-half
of the deductible for the plan - $1000 for singles and $2000 for doubles and
families. This increase is needed to keep up with the cost of medical services, in
additional to federally mandated contribution limits. The implementation of a
single provider network in 2011 has also been a significant source of savings for
employees and the City.
Utah Retirement Systems (URS) requires the city’s medical plan reserve be
maintained at a level to cover claims for a minimum of 55 days and a maximum of
100 days of premiums. The medical plan reserve balance has increased and has
continued to maintain a positive balance since 2011.
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
38 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
MARKET ADJUSTMENTS
As recommended by the Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee, the budget
includes market adjustments for certain benchmarked employee groups in the City
who lag either slightly or significantly behind market pay rates by more than 2%.
The projected costs for market adjustments are approximately $563,000 for the
general fund and $358,000 across other funds.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
The Capital Improvement Fund is used for payment of sales tax and class B/C
bond debt service and other infrastructure improvements including streets,
sidewalks, city buildings, curb, gutter, street lighting, parks, open space, trails and
bicycle facilities. More information on the specific projects funded this year will be
available in the Capital Improvement Program Budget. A summary of proposed
projects is included later in the budget book.
The budget includes a General Fund contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund
of $25.2 million including funding from the Funding Our Future sales tax. The
contribution for new or maintenance projects totals $10.8 million for fiscal year
2025. This amount will be added to bond funding and other funding to continue to
enhance and maintain capital assets.
The total fiscal year 2025 CIP exceeds $541 million with the inclusion of various
projects funded by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, the Department of
Airports, Public Utilities, Sustainability, Golf, federal and state partnerships, Class
“C” Funds, Impact Fees and the General Fund. Most of this funding is from Airport
CIP projects ($148.8 million), Public Utility improvements ($341.6 million) and $8.3
million in golf improvements to improve the golf experience on City owned
courses, and will support the positive trends golf has seen over the past two years.
FUNDING OUR FUTURE
To maintain our commitment to transparency, we have once again separated the
Funding Our Future budget of $57.8 million dollars to show use in the priority
areas of housing, transit, streets,public safety, and parks maintenance. Funding
supports a total of 172 FTE’s as well as setting aside funding for CIP.
Housing - The budget allocates $8 million toward affordable housing through land
discounts and financing, incentivized rent assistance and service to the most
vulnerable.
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
39 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Transit –$7 million is budgeted for the frequent transit network (FTN), with an
additional $3.3 million in funding for an on-demand ride service to help residents
reach transit networks.
Streets - The budget includes continuing funding for the new streets team funded
last year and additional equipment to expand the reach of that team. Additionally,
the budget includes $2 million for new infrastructure CIP projects.
Public Safety – The budget allocates funding for police officers, a Fire Department
Medical Response Team as well as mental health workers in both the Police and
Fire Departments. This year the expansion of the Rapid Intervention and the
Community Health Access Team are proposed to be funded through Funding Our
Future dollars.
CONCLUSION
The fiscal year 2024-2025 budget was prepared with the intent to maintain Salt
Lake City’s prosperity received over the past couple of years and sets forth a plan
to help the City meet ongoing costs with ongoing revenues. The budget will build
on the solid base the City has experienced and will help lead Salt Lake City into a
continued prosperous future, supporting the core values and services of the City.
This budget will allow City residents to continue to enjoy a safe, healthy, and
vibrant Salt Lake City.
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
40 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Revenue and Other Sources
GENERAL FUND (FC 100):
Property Taxes 110,885,727 113,861,387 114,923,082
RDA Related Property Tax 16,082,193 15,985,753 19,220,752
Sale and Use Taxes 172,197,395 166,213,479 177,400,679
Franchise Taxes 12,756,596 12,348,127 14,450,000
Payment in Lieu of Taxes 1,833,542 1,905,573 2,073,267
TOTAL TAXES 313,755,453 310,314,319 328,067,780
Intergovernmental Revenue 5,936,546 5,134,621 5,954,017
Charges for Services 5,811,594 4,881,922 6,886,113
Other Revenue 118,937,871 69,184,044 89,562,654
Interfund Transfers In 25,857,508 26,131,213 5,495,833
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES 156,543,519 105,331,800 107,898,617
SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES 470,298,972 415,646,119 435,966,397
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 32,868,798 39,278,681
TOTAL GENERAL FUND SOURCES 470,298,972 448,514,916 475,245,078
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND (FC 83, 84 & 86):
Intergovernmental Revenue 7,415,242 — 5,905,300
Sale of Land 23,115 200,000 —
Other Revenue 30,642,279 29,999,756 11,366,200
Bond Proceeds 89,956,695 — —
Interfund Transfers In 41,301,976 — 15,051,343
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND REVENUES 169,339,307 30,199,756 32,322,843
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 169,339,307 30,199,756 32,322,843
ENTERPRISE FUNDS:
AIRPORT (FC 540)
Intergovernmental Revenue 126,422,049 45,870,000 98,016,100
Charges for Services 268,344,801 330,988,600 179,784,800
Other Revenue 47,513,609 26,654,400 307,503,000
TOTAL AIRPORT FUND REVENUES 442,280,459 403,513,001 585,303,900
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 18,374,398 116,925,997 —
TOTAL AIRPORT FUND SOURCES 460,654,856 520,438,997 585,303,900
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
41 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GOLF (FC 680)
Charges for Services 10,644,232 10,550,653 11,286,031
Other Revenue 833,270 72,585 228,169
Interfund Transfers In 2,078,374 2,086,829 2,104,615
TOTAL GOLF FUND REVENUES 13,555,876 12,710,067 13,618,815
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 5,228,917 6,842,132
TOTAL GOLF FUND SOURCES 13,555,876 17,938,984 20,460,947
RDA (FC 920)
Charges for Services 311,954 1,403,600 —
Property Taxes 32,423,740 — 55,402,839
Other Revenue 7,345,557 47,321,567 8,548,376
Interfund Transfers In 41,165,412 27,037,843 20,705,669
TOTAL RDA FUND REVENUES 81,246,663 75,763,010 84,656,884
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 5,040,831 —
TOTAL RDA FUND SOURCES 81,246,663 80,803,841 84,656,884
REFUSE COLLECTION (FC 670)
Charges for Services 15,957,440 16,259,733 17,928,350
Other Revenue 2,767,515 8,980,726 4,734,044
TOTAL REFUSE COLLECTION FUND REVENUES 18,724,955 25,240,459 22,662,394
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 3,023,333 3,375,499
TOTAL REFUSE COLLECTION FUND SOURCES 18,724,955 28,263,792 26,037,893
SEWER UTILITY (FC 410)
Charges for Services 69,038,743 76,387,000 87,999,632
Debt Proceeds — 209,802,000 240,009,000
Other Revenue 18,798,268 3,752,178 3,750,152
TOTAL SEWER UTILITY FUND REVENUES 87,837,011 289,941,178 331,758,784
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 11,891,444 —
TOTAL SEWER UTILITY FUND SOURCES 87,837,011 301,832,622 331,758,784
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
42 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
STORM WATER UTILITY (FC 420)
Charges for Services 13,904,732 13,563,906 14,919,297
Debt Proceeds — 5,028,000 5,028,000
Other Revenue 5,747,159 1,273,986 3,069,901
TOTAL STORM WATER UTILITY FUND REVENUES 19,651,891 19,865,892 23,017,198
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 3,081,582 5,142,398
TOTAL STORM WATER UTILITY FUND SOURCES 19,651,891 22,947,474 28,159,596
WATER UTILITY (FC 400)
Charges for Services 88,469,344 94,273,390 121,640,205
Debt Proceeds — 62,346,000 100,558,000
Interest Income 4,453,143 — 463,989
Other Revenue 9,045,004 20,017,898 45,749,504
TOTAL WATER UTILITY FUND REVENUES 101,967,491 176,637,288 268,411,698
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 1,316,499 —
TOTAL WATER UTILITY FUND SOURCES 101,967,491 177,953,787 268,411,698
STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT (FC 430)
Charges for Services 4,288,143 4,592,185 5,051,394
Other Revenue 136,571 89,000 62,594
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND REVENUES 4,424,714 4,681,185 5,113,988
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 630,264 1,362,964 1,662,775
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT FUND SOURCES 5,054,978 6,044,149 6,776,763
HOUSING LOANS & TRUST (FC 690)
Miscellaneous Revenue 358,510 — 4,465,000
Charges for Services 11,119 — —
Other Revenue 1,546,031 13,619,432 954,000
Interfund Transfers In 1,019,188 1,039,611 —
TOTAL HOUSING LOANS & TRUST FUND REVENUES 2,934,848 14,659,043 5,419,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL HOUSING LOANS & TRUST FUND SOURCES 2,934,848 14,659,043 5,419,000
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
43 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS:
FLEET MANAGEMENT (FC 610)
Interfund Reimbursement 14,404,066 956,503 956,503
Charges for Services 140,279 18,037,796 19,292,645
Other Revenue 169,497 1,343,865 355,150
Interfund Transfers In 12,091,900 11,770,805 5,657,993
TOTAL FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND REVENUES 26,805,742 32,108,969 26,262,291
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 389,782 1,685,374
TOTAL FLEET MANAGEMENT FUND SOURCES 26,805,742 32,498,751 27,947,665
GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY (FC 630)
Property Taxes 3,775,947 3,888,581 3,888,581
Other Revenue 2,000,000 — 200,000
Interfund Transfers In 500,000 — —
TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND REVENUES 6,275,947 3,888,581 4,088,581
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND SOURCES 6,275,947 3,888,581 4,088,581
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (FC 650)
Charges for Services 27,373,914 36,254,357 40,526,281
Other Revenue (77,120) — —
Interfund Transfers In — — —
TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT. FUND REVENUES 27,296,794 36,254,357 40,526,282
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 132,827 2,447,814 —
TOTAL INFORMATION MGMT. FUND SOURCES 27,429,621 38,702,171 40,526,282
INSURANCE & RISK MANAGEMENT (FC 620)
Charges for Services 53,080,373 59,482,137 64,949,109
Other Revenue 190,143 1,450,000 200,000
TOTAL INSURANCE AND RISK MGMT. FUND REVENUES 53,270,516 60,932,137 65,149,109
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 2,642,518 —
TOTAL INSURANCE AND RISK MGMT. FUND SOURCES 53,270,516 63,574,655 65,149,109
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
44 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS:
CURB/GUTTER (FC 150)
Special Assessment Taxes 13,050 3,000 3,000
Other Revenue 412,600 — —
TOTAL CURB /GUTTER S.A. FUND REVENUES 425,650 3,000 3,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL CURB /GUTTER S.A. FUND SOURCES 425,650 3,000 3,000
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS:
CDBG OPERATING (FC 710)
Intergovernmental Revenue 4,074,525 5,597,763 5,485,515
Interfund Transfers In — — —
TOTAL CDBG FUND REVENUES 4,074,525 5,597,763 5,485,515
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL CDBG FUND SOURCES 4,074,525 5,597,763 5,485,515
EMERGENCY 911 DISPATCH (FC 750)
E911 Telephone Surcharges — — —
Charges for Services 5,001,226 3,850,000 3,925,000
Other Revenue 215,773 75,000 —
TOTAL E911 FUND REVENUES 5,216,999 3,925,000 3,925,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL E911 FUND SOURCES 5,216,999 3,925,000 3,925,000
MISC. GRANTS OPERATING (FC 720)
Intergovernmental Revenue 59,362,288 8,919,917 6,644,210
Other Revenue 789,837 — —
TOTAL MISC. GRANTS OPERATING FUND REVENUES 60,152,125 8,919,917 6,644,210
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL MISC. GRANTS OPERATING FUND SOURCES 60,152,125 8,919,917 6,644,210
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
45 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
MISC. SPEC. SERV. DISTRICTS (FC 760)
Special Assessment Taxes 1,568,910 1,700,000 1,700,000
Other Revenue 3,601 — —
Interfund Transfers In — —
TOTAL MISC. SPEC. SERV. DISTRICTS FUND REVENUES 1,572,511 1,700,000 1,700,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 96,120 — —
TOTAL MISC. SPEC. SERV. DISTRICTS FUND SOURCES 1,668,631 1,700,000 1,700,000
OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS (FC 730)
Miscellaneous Revenue 77,095 300,000 300,000
Charges for Services 212,838 — —
Other Revenue 77,136 — —
Interfund Transfers In 300,000 100,000 100,000
TOTAL OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND REVENUES 667,069 400,000 400,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL OTHER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND SOURCES 667,069 400,000 400,000
SALT LAKE CITY DONATION FUND (FC 770)
Intergovernmental Revenue 1,611,853 — —
Other Revenue 2,367,766 — —
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,165,184 500,000 500,000
TOTAL DONATION FUND REVENUES 5,144,803 500,000 500,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — — —
TOTAL DONATION FUND SOURCES 5,144,803 500,000 500,000
QUARTER CENT SALES TAX FOR TRANSPORTATION (FC 785)
Transfer from Salt Lake County 8,493,478 9,700,000 9,700,000
Other Revenue — — —
TOTAL QUARTER CENT REVENUES 8,493,478 9,700,000 9,700,000
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used 1,055,896 — 58,312
TOTAL QUARTER CENT SOURCES 9,549,374 9,700,000 9,758,312
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
46 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS:
DEBT SERVICE (FC 101)
Property Taxes 18,468,652 17,342,055 15,398,389
Intergovernmental Revenue 5,447,064 2,179,461 2,170,324
Bond proceeds 576,108 — —
Other Revenue 478,162 1,746,842 3,280,810
Interfund Transfers In 9,006,627 11,073,228 10,201,562
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND REVENUES 33,976,613 32,341,586 31,051,085
Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Used — 2,553,393 504,949
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND SOURCES 33,976,613 34,894,979 31,556,034
TOTAL REVENUE BUDGET 1,645,634,959 1,665,128,307 2,003,686,974
TOTAL USE OF FUND BALANCE 20,289,505 188,773,872 58,550,120
GRAND TOTAL OF SOURCES 1,665,924,464 1,853,902,179 2,062,237,093
Expenses and Other Uses
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
CITY COUNCIL OFFICE
General Fund 4,725,478 5,960,249 6,289,340
CITY COUNCIL OFFICE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,725,478 5,960,249 6,289,340
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
General Fund 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,396
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,396
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
Airport Fund 460,654,857 520,438,997 576,395,100
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — 8,908,800
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS TOTAL EXPENDITURES 460,654,857 520,438,997 585,303,900
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
47 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY
General Fund 8,683,237 10,490,844 12,881,528
Governmental Immunity Internal Svc. Fund 4,198,907 3,370,012 3,894,763
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 2,077,040 518,569 193,818
Insurance & Risk Mgmt. Internal Svc. Fund 3,533,343 4,856,345 5,091,906
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,415,486 18,717,200 21,868,197
DEPT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS
General Fund 30,935,445 33,143,161 34,709,138
DEPT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS TOTAL EXPENDITURES 30,935,445 33,143,161 34,709,138
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
General Fund 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
General Fund 10,038,470 12,168,296 12,963,889
IMS - IFAS 4,814,192 5,929,187 —
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
Risk 35,562 44,741 44,741
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,888,224 18,142,224 13,008,630
FIRE DEPARTMENT
General Fund 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,009
FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,009
HUMAN RESOURCES
General Fund 3,722,111 4,659,300 5,059,723
Insurance & Risk Mgmt. Internal Svc. Fund 46,899,399 58,673,569 60,012,462
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 2,802,212 — —
HUMAN RESOURCES TOTAL EXPENDITURES 50,621,510 63,332,869 65,072,185
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
48 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Information Management Service Fund 22,615,429 32,772,984 40,526,282
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
INFO. MGMT. SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICES FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22,615,429 32,772,984 40,526,282
JUSTICE COURT
General Fund 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110
JUSTICE COURT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110
POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Fund 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456
POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456
PUBLIC LANDS
General Fund 24,468,048 27,295,271 29,716,013
Golf Enterprise Fund 10,163,906 17,938,984 20,460,948
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 3,391,970 — —
PUBLIC LANDS TOTAL EXPENDITURES 34,631,954 45,234,255 50,176,960
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Fund 37,330,130 43,449,292 46,261,468
Fleet Management Internal Service Fund 21,787,416 32,498,750 27,947,665
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 5,018,326 — —
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 59,117,546 75,948,042 74,209,133
911 COMMUNICATION BUREAU
General Fund 10,109,240 11,259,756 11,610,306
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,109,240 11,259,756 11,610,306
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund 48,156,069 301,832,622 311,873,824
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 39,680,942 — 19,884,960
Storm Water Utility Enterprise Fund 11,019,868 22,947,474 28,159,596
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 8,632,023 — —
Water Utility Enterprise Fund 82,224,402 177,953,787 206,304,772
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
49 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 19,743,089 — 62,106,926
Street Lighting Enterprise Funds 5,054,978 6,044,149 6,776,763
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 146,455,317 508,778,032 553,114,955
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT
Refuse Fund 16,142,599 28,263,792 26,037,893
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 2,582,356 — —
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,142,599 28,263,792 26,037,893
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Redevelopment Agency Fund 68,238,864 80,803,841 84,656,884
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 13,007,799 — —
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL EXPENDITURES 68,238,864 80,803,841 84,656,884
NON DEPARTMENTAL
General Fund 133,576,286 120,112,701 123,069,522
Curb/Gutter Special Assessment Fund 82 3,000 3,000
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 425,568 — —
CDBG Operating Special Revenue Fund 4,056,150 5,597,763 5,485,515
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 18,375 — —
Emergency 911 Dispatch Special Rev. Fund 3,800,385 3,800,385 3,913,585
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 1,416,614 124,615 11,415
Housing Loans & Trust Special Rev. Fund 1,048,561 10,212,043 5,419,000
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 1,886,287 4,447,000 —
Misc. Grants Operating Special Rev. Fund 58,621,665 8,919,917 6,644,210
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 1,530,460 — —
Misc. Spec. Svc. Districts Special Rev. Fund 1,668,631 1,700,000 1,700,000
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation 9,549,374 9,700,000 9,758,312
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves — — —
Other Special Revenue Funds 325,173 400,000 400,000
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 341,896 — —
Salt Lake City Donation Fund 3,780,293 500,000 500,000
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
50 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 1,364,510 — —
Debt Service Funds 30,343,954 34,894,979 31,556,034
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 3,632,659 — —
Capital Projects Fund 56,759,529 29,708,286 32,322,843
Increase Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 112,579,778 491,470 —
NON DEPARTMENTAL TOTAL EXPENDITURES 303,530,083 225,549,074 220,772,021
GEN FUND BAL/CASH RESERVES
TOTAL EXPENSE BUDGET 1,403,328,052 1,848,320,524 1,971,131,177
TOTAL INC TO FUND BALANCE 220,131,904 5,581,654 91,105,919
GRAND TOTAL OF USES 1,623,459,956 1,853,902,178 2,062,237,097
NET CHANGE TO FUND BALANCE 199,842,399 (183,192,218) 32,555,800
(USE OF) OR INCREASE TO FUND BALANCE
TOTAL EXPENSES BY FUND TYPE:
Governmental Fund Type:
TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 427,834,464 448,514,918 475,245,078
CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 4,725,478 5,960,249 6,289,340
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,396
SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY 8,683,237 10,490,844 12,881,528
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS 30,935,445 33,143,161 34,709,138
DEPT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 10,038,470 12,168,296 12,963,889
FIRE DEPARTMENT 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,009
HUMAN RESOURCES 3,722,111 4,659,300 5,059,723
JUSTICE COURTS 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110
POLICE DEPARTMENT 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456
PUBLIC LANDS 24,468,048 27,295,271 29,716,013
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT 37,330,130 43,449,292 46,261,468
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 10,109,240 11,259,756 11,610,306
NON DEPARTMENTAL 133,576,286 120,112,701 123,069,522
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 81,801,671 30,618,065 28,401,622
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 30,344,036 34,897,979 31,559,034
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
51 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS 56,759,529 29,708,286 32,322,843
Proprietary Fund Type:
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 103,884,248 138,145,588 137,517,819
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 702,704,104 1,166,435,689 1,266,084,780
TOTAL EXPENSE BUDGET 1,403,328,052 1,848,320,525 1,971,131,180
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
ANNUAL FISCAL PERIOD 2024-25
MAYORS
ADOPTED RECOMMENDED
ACTUALS BUDGET BUDGET
FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
52 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Prior Year Adopted Budget 395,022,799 53,492,119 448,514,918
Taxes
Property Tax
New Growth 1,000,000 1,000,000
Property Tax Stabilization 1,000,000 1,000,000
Judgment Levy (1,289,025) (1,289,025)
RDA Tax Increment 3,675,752 3,675,752
Inland Port Increment 209,967 209,967
Other anticipated changes (interest, board letters) (300,000) (300,000)
PILOT 167,694 167,694
Sales Tax
General Fund 3,787,200 7,400,000 11,187,200
Franchise Taxes 2,101,873 2,101,873
Licenses and Permits
Licenses 1,744,771 1,744,771
Permits (3,634,854) (3,634,854)
Intergovernmental Revenue 819,396 819,396
Charges for Services (includes CPI increase) 1,100,282 1,100,282
Rental and Other Income 358,785 358,785
Fines 383,488 383,488
Parking Meter Collections (99,758) (99,758)
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue 340,565 340,565
Interfund Reimbursement 4,438,444 4,438,444
Administrative Fees 1,558,810 1,558,810
Other
Transfers (1,139,178) (1,139,178)
Change in One-Time Revenue
FY2025 One-Time Revenues
Use of Fund Balance 36,834,582 662,906 37,497,488
Recapture of REP Funding 1,781,192 1,781,192
Remove FY2024 One-Time Revenues
One Time Use of General Fund Balance (25,867,308) (3,657,641) (29,524,949)
Transfer - Health Insurance Premium Holiday (2 periods) (2,152,284) (2,152,284)
Transfer - ARPA Salary Restoration Removal (792,195) (792,195)
Transfer - Fleet (359,454) (359,454)
Recapture of REP Funding (1,781,192) (1,781,192)
GENERAL FUND REVENUE KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Funding Our Future TOTAL
Revenue Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
53 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Recapture of Downtown Summer 2023 Street Activation One-time Funding (500,000) (500,000)
Recapture of City Hall Security Improvements One-time Funding (379,450) (379,450)
Recapture of Downtown Central Precinct Lease and Tenant Improvements One-time Funding (643,208) (643,208)
Recapture of Black Water Tank Disposal Voucher Program One-time Funding (10,000) (10,000)
Recapture of Historic Signs/Markers (one time funding) (30,000) (30,000)
Proposed Revenue 421,343,716 57,897,384 475,245,078
GENERAL FUND REVENUE KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Funding Our Future TOTAL
Revenue Changes
Department
City Council 5,610,149 39.00
Base to Base (296,864) — — — (296,864) —
Salary Proposal 405,271 — — — 405,271 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 48,524 — — — 48,524 —
Pension/401k 44,840 — — — 44,840 —
Health Savings Account 19,750 — — — 19,750 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — — —
Council Member Salary Adjustments 57,570 — — — 57,570 —
Executive Security 50,000 50,000
TOTAL City Council 5,939,240 39.00 — — 5,939,240 39.00
Legislative Non Departmental 350,100
No New Proposals — —
TOTAL Legislative Non Departmental 350,100 — — — 350,100 —
Mayor's Office 6,820,067 34.00
Base to Base 26,915 — — — 26,915 —
Salary Proposal 57,200 — — — 57,200 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 15,021 — — — 15,021 —
Pension/401k (24,548) — — — (24,548) —
Health Savings Account 17,250 — — — 17,250 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 53,821 — — — 53,821 —
Budget Amendment #2: Love Your Block 62,250 — — 62,250 —
Office Reconfiguration (25,000) (25,000)
SLC Volunteer Corps expansion (Consultant +OpEx) (Ongoing) 63,000 — — 63,000 —
Love Your Block Program - tools & expansion (One-time) 69,000 — — 69,000 —
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund FTE Funding Our Future FTE TOTAL FTE
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
54 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Senior Advisor to the Mayor (39) - 12 months (Ongoing) 216,420 1.00 — — 216,420 1.00
Community cultural events (supplies) (Ongoing) 15,000 — — — 15,000 —
TOTAL Mayor's Office 7,366,396 35.00 — — 7,366,396 35.00
Attorney's Office 10,490,844 60.50
Base to Base 82,365 — — — 82,365 —
Salary Proposal 1,333,860 — — — 1,333,860 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 120,416 — — — 120,416 —
Pension/401k 151,306 — — — 151,306 —
Health Savings Account 39,500 — — — 39,500 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 13,977 — — — 13,977 —
Office Reconfiguration (55,000) (55,000)
Budget Amendment #4: Legislative Affairs Division 250,000 4.00 250,000 4.00
Operating Costs - Leg Affairs (Ongoing) 80,000 — — — 80,000 —
Professional Development (One-time) 49,000 — — 49,000 —
Personnel Adjustments - Leg Affairs (Adjust grade from N21 to E35) (Ongoing) 85,287 85,287
Personnel Adjustments - Recorders (Deputy Recorders from E26 to E31) (Ongoing) 89,710 — — 89,710 —
Special Projects Analyst - Boards Compensation Analyst (E26) - 10 months 89,640 1.00 — — 89,640 1.00
Prosecutors Office - City Prosecutor Assistant (10 months) 60,623 1.00 60,623 1.00
TOTAL Attorney's Office 12,881,528 65.50 — — 12,881,528 66.50
Community and Neighborhoods 28,682,472 187.00 4,460,689 8.00 33,143,161 195.00
Base to Base 1,024,588 — — 1,024,588 —
Salary Proposal 1,312,270 — 64,088 — 1,376,358 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 262,450 — 36,292 — 298,742 —
Pension/401k 157,347 — 8,514 — 165,861 —
Health Savings Account 95,250 — 5,750 — 101,000 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 213,920 — — — 213,920 —
Youth & Family 4 FTE - Typically Grant Funded (447,136) (4.00) — — (447,136) (4.00)
Train Crossing Safety Signage — (150,000) — (150,000) —
Budget Amendment: PD Substation TI moved to PS (513,208) — — — (513,208) —
Planning Study (100,000) — — — (100,000) —
Youth & Family Strategic Plan (100,000) — — — (100,000) —
Homeless - Ambassador Expansion Area Increase 197,399 — — — 197,399 —
Homeless - Black Water Tank Disposal Voucher Program (10,000) — — — (10,000) —
Homeless - RV Repairs (100,000) — (100,000)
Homeless - Winter Shelter Overflow (60,000) (60,000)
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund FTE Funding Our Future FTE TOTAL FTE
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
55 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Homeless - United Site Portable Toilet Rental (27,399) (27,399)
Communications & Engagement Manager (Grade 34) (10 Mths) 139,715 1.00 — — 139,715 1.00
Building Inspector III (E27) - (10 Mths) 104,580 1.00 — — 104,580 1.00
Vehicle —
Fleet Fuel Increase 11,557 — — 11,557 —
Consolidation of City Lease Budgets - CIP (560,000) — — (560,000) —
TOTAL Community and Neighborhoods 30,283,806 185.00 4,425,332 8.00 34,709,138 193.00
Economic Development 4,425,091 22.00
Base to Base 55,113 — — — 55,113 —
Salary Proposal 292,414 — — — 292,414 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 81,596 — — — 81,596 —
Pension/401k 41,718 — — — 41,718 —
Health Savings Account 17,500 — — — 17,500 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 3,751 — — — 3,751 —
Budget Amendment #2 - Project Manager 1.00 1.00
Construction Mitigation Funding — — — — — —
DED Strategic Plan (One-time) (80,000) (80,000)
Partnerships w./ Nonprofits Servicing Local Small Business (30,000) (30,000)
Granary District Special Assessment Area Study (60,000) — — — (60,000) —
Main Street Promenade Economic Analysis 115,000 — — — 115,000 —
Construction Mitigation Funding (100,000) — — (100,000) —
Sister Cities PT Employee 47,000 0.50 47,000 0.50
TOTAL Economic Development 4,809,183 22.50 — — 4,809,183 23.50
Finance Department 12,168,296 81.70
Base to Base 154,466 — — — 154,466 —
Salary Proposal 276,966 — — — 276,966 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 66,413 — — — 66,413 —
Pension/401k 18,428 — — — 18,428 —
Health Savings Account 37,600 — — — 37,600 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — — —
ResourceX Program Based Budgeting 60,000 — — — 60,000 —
Business Systems Analyst (10 Mths) - 2 FTE 126,437 2.00 — — 126,437 2.00
Grant Analyst - PT to FT 55,284 1.00 — — 55,284 1.00
TOTAL Finance Department 12,963,889 84.70 — — 12,963,889 84.70
Fire Department 50,863,404 388.00 1,400,953 14.00
Base to Base 163,859 — — 163,859 —
Salary Proposal 1,660,499 — 69,304 — 1,729,802 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 488,220 — (15,141) — 473,079 —
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund FTE Funding Our Future FTE TOTAL FTE
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
56 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Pension/401k (414,766) — 9,585 — (405,181) —
Health Savings Account 205,750 — 5,000 — 210,750 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — —
Chat Program One-time Program Costs — — (2,000) (2,000) —
Fire Captain - Medical Division One-time Program Costs — — (2,500) (2,500) —
SCBA Compressor & Hydrostatic Testing One-time Costs (114,000) — — — (114,000) —
BA3#: Medical Response Paramedics 2.00 — 2.00
Medical Response Paramedics (MRPs) — — 163,727 2.00 163,727 2.00
Contracts/Inflationary Increases 243,365 — — — 243,365 —
Narcotics Tracking System 65,000 — — — 65,000 —
Light Fleet Vehicles — — — — — —
Transfer to Non-Departmental for Fire Hydrant (241,250) — — — (241,250) —
TOTAL Fire 52,920,080 390.00 1,628,928 16.00 54,549,009 406.00
Human Resources Department 4,659,300 33.40
Base to Base 139,302 — — — 139,302 —
Salary Proposal 177,135 — — — 177,135 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 43,715 — — — 43,715 —
Pension/401k 15,821 — — — 15,821 —
Health Savings Account 24,450 — — — 24,450 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — — —
TOTAL Human Resources 5,059,723 33.40 — — 5,059,723 33.40
Justice Court 5,489,720 42.00
Base to Base 15,375 — — — 15,375 —
Salary Proposal 251,987 — — — 251,987 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 90,540 — — — 90,540 —
Pension/401k (3,125) — — — (3,125) —
Health Savings Account 25,250 — — — 25,250 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — — —
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund FTE Funding Our Future FTE TOTAL FTE
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
57 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Community Outreach Case Manager (Grade 19) (12 Mos) — — 88,363 1.00 1.00
Community Outreach Van — — — — — —
TOTAL Justice Court 5,869,747 42.00 88,363 1.00 5,958,110 43.00
Police Department 97,959,909 672.00 665 13,016,903 89.00
Base to Base (289,598) — — (289,598) —
Non Dept Social Works Transfer
Salary Proposal 824,336 — 2,109,141 — 2,933,477 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) (146,652) — 350,523 — 203,871 —
Pension/401k (1,684,750) — 187,183 — (1,497,567) —
Health Savings Account 292,500 — 67,250 — 359,750 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 48,464 — — 48,464 —
BA #4: Police Clean Neighborhoods — — 1,829,000 — 1,829,000 —
Increased Airport Operations One-time Expenses (106,680) — — (106,680) —
Increased Civilian Response One-time Equipment Costs — — (74,056) — (74,056) —
Calls for Service: Overtime Staffing — — 0 1,363,461 — 1,363,461 —
Inflationary Costs 199,145 — — — 199,145 —
Inflationary Costs: Fleet 232,399 — — — 232,399 —
Evidence Drying Locker Replacement 60,000 — — — 60,000 —
Contract, Event, Task Force Overtime (Revenue Offset) 1,434,295 — — — 1,434,295 —
Airport Staffing and Equipment (Revenue Offset) 2,328,683 6.00 — — 2,328,683 6.00
TOTAL Police Department 101,152,051 678.00 18,849,405 89.00 120,001,456 767.00
Public Lands 25,446,600 138.35 1,848,671 19.50
Base to Base 126,350 — — 126,350 —
Salary Proposal 298,883 — 278,046 — 576,929 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 62,939 — 161,011 — 223,950 —
Pension/401k (28,461) — 104,267 — 75,806 —
Health Savings Account 63,175 — 25,250 — 88,425 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 87,117 — — 87,117 —
T&NL New Properties & Growth and Use Impacts One-time Operational Expenses — — (50,000) — (50,000) —
BA #4: Ongoing Needs at Liberty Park 31,250 — — 31,250 —
BA #2: Planning & Design Division 4.00 4.00
BA #2: Operating Costs - Engineering Staff 12,000 — — 12,000 —
Contractual Increases 796,800 796,800 —
Glendale Park Phase I — — 106,800 106,800 —
Glendale Park Phase I: Maintenance Tech III (Grade 119 Union) (10 Mnths) — — 76,700 1.00 76,700 1.00
Public Lands Project Coordinator (Grade 26) (10 Mnths) — — — 1.00 — 1.00
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund FTE Funding Our Future FTE TOTAL FTE
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
58 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Senior Public Lands Planner (Grade 31) (10 Mnths) 121,979 1.00 — — 121,979 1.00
FTE Operational Budget 4,000 4,000
Senior Landscape Architect (Grade 34) (10 Mnths) 138,636 1.00 — 138,636 1.00
FTE Operational Budget 4,000 4,000
TOTAL Public Lands 27,165,268 144.35 2,550,745 21.50 29,716,013 165.85
Public Services 39,909,574 247.00 3,539,718 26.00
Base to Base 92,358 — — 92,358 —
Salary Proposal 212,849 — — 212,849 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 145,217 — (10,333) — 134,884 —
Pension/401k (19,122) — 52,203 — 33,080 —
Health Savings Account 117,000 — (3,528) — 113,472 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments 126,436 — 15,500 — 141,936 —
Budget Amendment #3: Road Marking Maintenance (Moved to CIP Maint.) — — 200,000 — 200,000 —
BA #2: Planning & Design Division (4.00) (4.00)
Mill and Overlay Pilot Program — — (130,000) — (130,000) —
Environmental Engineer One-time Expenses (18,000) — — — (18,000) —
Building Administrator One-time Expenses (2,750) — — — (2,750) —
Contractual Increases 603,308 — — — 603,308 —
Inflationary Increases 340,109 — — — 340,109 —
Internal Security Program - Consultant Costs 75,000 — — — 75,000 —
Incentive for RV Removal and Disposal — — 100,000 — 100,000 —
Project Delivery Support for Parks Projects 249,694 2.00 — — 249,694 2.00
Rapid Intervention Team (Following Pilot) — — 253,026 3.00 253,026 3.00
Rapid Intervention Team Vehicles (2) — —
Mill and Overlay Increase — — 296,000 — 296,000 —
Engineer IV (E31) - 10 Months 117,210 1.00 117,210 1.00
Reclass Seasonal to Sign and Markings Technicians — 2.00 — — — 2.00
TOTAL Public Services 41,948,882 248.00 4,312,585 29.00 46,261,468 277.00
911 Dispatch 10,412,910 92.00 846,846 8.00 100.00
Base to Base (113,642) — — (113,642) —
Salary Proposal 171,575 — 35,401 — 206,976 —
Health Insurance (3.66%) 128,127 — 51,935 — 180,061 —
Pension/401k 8,412 — 6,492 — 14,904 —
Health Savings Account 54,000 — 8,250 — 62,250 —
CCAC Salary Adjustments — — — — — —
TOTAL 911 Dispatch 10,661,382 92.00 948,924 8.00 11,610,306 100.00
Departmental Totals 319,371,274 2,059.45 32,804,283 172.50 352,175,556 2,233.95
GENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund FTE Funding Our Future FTE TOTAL FTE
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
59 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
rtar Apprenticeship Program 630,000 (500,000) — — 130,000
Employee Appreciation / CEAB Budget 150,000 — — — 150,000
City Hall Security Improvements (Remove One-Time) 379,450 (379,450) — — —
City Hall Police Presence (Ongoing) 280,350 — — 62,400 342,750
City Hall Security: City Hall Public Order Security (Ongoing) — — — 99,840 99,840
City Hall Security: Protective Detail (Ongoing) — 120,000 — — 120,000
Fire SCBAArt 197,400 — — — 197,400
Police Body Cameras and Vehicle Integration 687,422 — 512,578 — 1,200,000
Axon Body Camera Services Enhancement 349,692 — — 143,280 492,972
City Resident Bus Pass (HIVE) 350,000 — — — 350,000
Free Bus Passes for School Children,Parents,Guardian,Faculty 100,000 — 114,648 214,648
Contract for Animal Services 1,970,648 98,532 — — 2,069,180
Demographic Contract 50,000 — — — 50,000
Jordan River Commission (Membership) 16,000 — — — 16,000
Municipal Elections 20,000 — — —
Election Cost - FY 2025 — 50,000 — — 50,000
Election Cost 294,551 (294,551) — — —
Ranked Choice Voting Awareness 40,000 (40,000) — — —
Oath of Office Event 30,000 (30,000) — — —
Outgoing Elected Official Event 20,000 (20,000) — — —
Retirement Payouts 696,000 — — — 696,000
Sorenson Center with County 1,014,800 — — — 1,014,800
Transportation Utility Fee Consultant [One-Time] 50,000 (50,000) — — —
Tuition Aid program 320,000 — — — 320,000
GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Change Funding Our Future Change TOTAL
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
60 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Capital Improvement Fund:
Debt Service Fund
Debt Service on Bonds 9,540,526 (815,049) — — 8,725,477
Debt Service on ESCO 761,000 162,600 — — 923,600
Debt Service on LBA
Ongoing Commitments
Transfer to CIP for ongoing commitments 600,000 560,000 — — 1,160,000
Facilities Capital Replacement 350,000 — — — 350,000
Parks Capital Replacement 250,000 — — — 250,000
Planning and Design 350,000 350,000
Public Lands Transfer back to CIP for Maintenance — — — 683,152 683,152
Vacant Building Maintenance
CIP Percent for art 167,378 — — 167,378
CIP Contingency 223,171 — — 223,171
New Projects
Capital Improvement Projects Fund 7,300,000 — 3,100,000 54,490 10,454,490
Westside New Project (Art) — 150,000 (150,000) —
Historic Signs/Markers [One Time] 30,000 (30,000) — — —
Historic Signs/Markers [One Time] — 30,000 — — 30,000
Fleet Fund:
Fleet - Replacement Fund 5,000,000 — — — 5,000,000
Streets Fleet Equipment Replacement — — 1,700,000 (1,700,000) —
Public Safety Apparatus/Vehicle Replacement — — 4,000,000 (4,000,000) —
Remove FY2024 Vehicles for New Positions 135,000 908,350 (908,350) —
Vehicles for New Positions in FY2025 — 112,000 — 545,993 657,993
Fleet - Centralized Fleet Maintenance
Parts/Equipment/Labor 717,954 — — — 717,954
Golf Fund:
Golf (Living Wage and CCAC Salary Adjustments Transfer) 370,100 — — — 370,100
Golf ESCO Payment Transfer [One-Time] Prior Year 510,427 (510,427) — — —
Golf ESCO Payment Transfer [One-Time] Current Year — 528,213 — — 528,213
Golf Admin Fee Transfer 356,302 — — — 356,302
Golf IMS Fee Transfer 350,000 — — — 350,000
Rosepark Infrastructure renewal 500,000 — — — 500,000
Information Management Services Fund:
IMS Services 18,881,573 — 430,054 — 19,311,627
IMS Personnel Costs — — — — —
GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Change Funding Our Future Change TOTAL
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
61 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
IMS New Personnel 108,000 — — — 108,000
IMS Contractual and Other Increases 1,395,354 — — — 1,395,354
Contractual Increases - Increased Cost of Software 1,018,399 1,018,399
Inflationary Increases (Ongoing) 450,641 — 450,641
Audio Visual Technology (Ongoing) — 127,648 — — 127,648
Reduction Strategy - Legacy Systems and Consulting due to Implementation of Workday — (650,000) — — (650,000)
Spidr Tech Post 911 Call Text (FY 2024 One-time) — (10,000) — — (10,000)
Versaterm (Fire, Police, Attorneys Office) — — 578,975 578,975
Budget Amendment increase 397,688 397,688
Radio System Transfer to IMS from General Fund (Fire, Police, E911, Public Services) 241,645 — — — 241,645
Radio Replacement Program (One-time) — 250,000 — — 250,000
PSB Printer Maintenance Transfer to IMS from General Fund (Police) 55,000 — — — 55,000
New CAP Software ($350,000 one-time) $250,000 on going — 350,000 (100,000) 250,000
AutoCAD 22,000 — — — 22,000
Zoom Enterprise Software 25,000 — — — 25,000
Budget for New Positions — 32,500 — 11,000 43,500
Budget for Prior Year New Positions Remove [One-Time]? 127,750 (127,750) 59,164 (59,164) —
Insurance and Risk Management Fund
Salary Adjustments — — — —
Insurance Premium Increases — 468,171 — — 468,171
Life Savings Account 500,000 (500,000) — — —
Public Utilities Funds:
Public Utilities - HIVE : Pass through expense 61,000 — — — 61,000
Public Utilities - Land Swap payment 200,000 (200,000) — — —
Public Utilities - Assistance 100,000 — — — 100,000
Transfer from Fire for Fire Hydrant Fee — — 241,250 — 241,250
Fire Hydrant Fee (Ongoing) — — — 293,219 293,219
Water Usage Study - Transfer to Public Utilities [One-Time] 100,000 (100,000) — — —
Street Lighting
Street lighting (GF owned properties) 50,000 — — — 50,000
Street Lighting in Enhanced Service Areas (GF owned properties) 54,420 — — — 54,420
SAA Street Lighting 80,000 — — — 80,000
Redevelopment Agency Fund
RDA Tax Increment 15,985,753 3,675,752 — — 19,661,505
GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Change Funding Our Future Change TOTAL
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
62 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Housing Plan - Land Discounts and Financing (transfer to RDA) — — 1,840,000 750,000 2,590,000
Gap Financing for Switchpoints Project on N. Temple (One-time) — 250,000 (250,000) —
Switchpoint and Catalytic Grant Program — 750,000 (750,000) —
Sanctioned Camping Catalytic Grant Prog Holding Account (One-time) — 500,000 (500,000) —
Special Revenue Fund
Environmental Assessment Fund 100,000 — — — 100,000
Sustainability Fund —
GF E&E Operation Funding 1,170,900 — — — 1,170,900
E&E Food Program Funding Reinstatement (One-time) — — — —
Air Quality Incentives Program Expansion 230,000 (230,000)
Misc Program Efficiency Reductions (One-time) — — — —
Police Department and Racial Equity In Policing Funding
Police Officer Training (One-Time) 55,000 (55,000) — — —
Social Worker Program — — 706,553 — 706,553
Increased Mental Health Responders 562,500 — 571,074 — 1,133,574
Commission of Racial Equity & Policing 120,000 — — — 120,000
REP Commission Peer Court Support 20,000 (20,000) — — —
Arbinger Leadership Cohort (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 74,688 74,688
Leadership in Police Organization (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 52,500 52,500
School Resource Training (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 22,775 22,775
Culturally Responsive Therapy for Negative Police Interactions (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 99,840 99,840
REP FY2021 Holding Account [FY2021 REP Fund Balance] — — 1,531,389 — 1,531,389
Sales Tax Option - Transit Plan —
Transit Plan - Service for Key Routes — — 7,000,000
Transit Plan - On Demand Ride Services (Smaller Service Area) — — 3,000,000 307,807 3,307,807
Transit Plan - UTA Outreach — 100,000 100,000
Municipal Contributions & Civic Support
Mayor - Receptions/Employee Appreciation 20,000 — — — 20,000
ACE Fund 200,000 100,000 — — 300,000
Board and Commissions Honoraria (One-time) 26,000 (26,000) — — —
Diversity Outreach (CoCs, etc.) 3,000 — — — 3,000
Healthcare Innovation - Biohive 100,000 — — — 100,000
Downtown Street Activation One-time for Summer and Fall 2023 (One-time) 500,000 (500,000) — — —
GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Change Funding Our Future Change TOTAL
Expense Changes
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
63 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Open Streets-Continuation of Downtown Streets (One-time) — 400,000 — 400,000
Housing Authority Transitional Housing 85,000 — — — 85,000
Legal Defenders 1,645,067 79,750 — 1,724,817
Local Business Marketing Grants 20,000 — — — 20,000
Music Licensing Fees - Moving to IMS 9,000 (9,000) — — —
National League of Cities and Towns 12,797 — 12,797
Rape Recovery Center 30,000 — — — 30,000
Sister Cities 10,000 20,000 — 30,000
Salary Contingency 760,000 (760,000) — — —
Salt Lake City Arts Council 800,000 — 200,000 — 1,000,000
Salt Lake City Foundation 3,000 — — — 3,000
SL Area Chamber of Commerce 55,000 — — — 55,000
Suazo Membership 45,000 — —— 45,000
Sugar House Park Authority 270,251 (33,654) —— 236,597
Tracy Aviary 763,526 50,647 — 814,173
US Conference of Mayors Membership 12,242 2,000 — — 14,242
Utah Economic Development Corporation 108,000 — — — 108,000
Utah League of Cities and Towns Membership 233,474 9,873 — 243,347
Wasatch Community Gardens - Apprentice Gardner (from Apprentice Funding) 50,000 —— 50,000
World Trade Center Membership 50,000 — —— 50,000
PD Expungements 300,000 300,000
VOA-Detox 1,000,000
Salary Contingency 2,131,513
YWCA - FJC Wrap around services 45,000 — — — 45,000
— — — — —
TOTAL Non-Departmental 92,017,346 5,959,074 29,730,657 (4,637,555) 123,069,522
GENERAL FUND NON-DEPARTMENTAL KEY CHANGES
FY2025
General Fund Change Funding Our Future Change TOTAL
Expense Changes
CIP Fund (FC 300)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY24 Beginning Balance 30,199,756
Eliminate FY2024 GF Funding (Including Funding Our Future, less Debt Service)-13478136
Eliminate FY2024 Class C Funding (3,500,000)
Eliminate FY2024 Impact Fees Funding (2,968,850)
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
64 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Eliminate FY2024 funding from ¼¢ Sales Tax (8,191,470)
Eliminate FY2024 Funding from additional sources (2,061,300)
FY2025 GF Funding (Excluding transfer directly to Debt Service) 21,355,753
FY2025 General Fund Funding our Future 4,520,794
FY 2025 Less amount transferred directly to debt service (10,825,204)
FY2025 Class C Funding (Excluding transfer directly to Debt Service) 4,250,000
FY2025 Impact Fee Funding 3,146,200
FY2025 ¼¢ Sales Tax Funding 8,200,000
FY2025 Funding from additional sources 175,300
FY2025 Landfill 1,500,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 2,123,087 32,322,843
Expenses and Other Uses
FY24 Beginning Balance
30,199,756
Eliminate FY2024 Ongoing Commitment Funding (2,100,000)
Eliminate FY2024 Capital Projects Funding (11,169,047)
Eliminate FY2024 ¼¢ Sales Tax Funding (8,191,470)
Eliminate FY2024 General Fund One Time Sources [Historic Signs/Markers] (30,000)
Eliminate FY2024 Class C Funding (3,500,000)
Eliminate FY2024 Streets Impact Fee Funding (240,000)
Eliminate FY2024 Parks Impact Fee Funding (2,728,850)
Eliminate FY2024 Transfer to LBA Fire Stations #3 & #14 (1,180,800)
Eliminate FY2024 Cost Overrun and Percent for Art (409,089)
Eliminate FY2024 Transfer to Debt Service GF (150,500)
Eliminate FY2024 Funding from additional resources (500,000)
FY2025 Ongoing Commitment Funding 3,513,152
FY2025 Capital Projects Funding 11,137,642
FY2025 Class C Funding (Excluding transfer directly to Debt Service) 4,250,000
FY2025 Parks Impact Fees Funding 3,146,200
FY2025 ¼¢ Sales Tax Funding 8,200,000
Cost Overrun and Percent for art 390,549
Transfer to Debt Service - General Fund 155,300
FY25 Ongoing Landfill 1,500,000
Transfer In for Historic Signs/Markers [One-time] 30,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2,123,087 32,322,843
Budgeted revenues and other sources over — —
(under) expenditures and other uses
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
65 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Curb and Gutter (FC 150)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 3,000
No Changes —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 3,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 3,000
No Changes
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 3,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over —
(under) expenditures and other uses
Misc. Special Service Districts (FC 760)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,700,000
Change in revenue from New Assessment
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 1,700,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,700,000
Change in expense from New Assessment
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 1,700,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses —
Street Lighting Enterprise Fund (FC 430)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance-base lighting 4,681,185
Street lighting fees 459,209
Change in interest income (1,406)
Grants (25,000)
Transfer from the General Fund —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 432,803 5,113,988
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance-base lighting 6,044,149 2.57
Personnel services -0.22 35,020
Charges for service 447,628
Capital outlay 1,250,000
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
66 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Capital improvements (1,000,000)
Debt services -34
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2.35 732,614 6,776,763
Budgeted revenues and other sources over (1,662,775)
(under) expenditures and other uses
Water Utility (FC 400)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 176,637,288
Change in Metered Water Sales 26,609,260
Change in Interest Income 7,487
Other Revenue 1,180,663
Grants 25,865,000
Impact Fees —
Sale of Equipment —
Transfer from General Fund (100,000)
Bond proceeds 38,212,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 91,774,410 268,411,698
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 177,953,787 298.21
Personnel services -2.22 2,718,363
Operating & maintenance 1,208,981
Charges for service 8,695,906
Capital outlay 1,930,477
Capital improvements 11,618,000
Cost of bond issuance 212,000
Debt services 1,967,258
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 295.99 28,350,985 206,304,772
Budgeted revenues and other sources over 62,106,926
(under) expenditures and other uses
Sewer (FC 410)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 289,941,178
Change in Sewer Utility Service Revenue 11,612,632
Other Revenues 961,002
Change in Interest Income (64,798)
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
67 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Other sources (898,230)
WIFIA Loan (18,061,000)
Bond Proceeds 48,268,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 41,817,606 331,758,784
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 301,832,622 130.8
Personnel Services 0.08 1,261,872
Operating & Maintenance 759,172
Charges for Service 1,652,111
Capital Outlay (647,366)
Capital Improvements 3,033,560
Cost of bond issuance 268,000
Debt Service 3,713,853
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 130.88 10,041,202 311,873,824
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 19,884,960
Storm Water Utility (FC 420)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 19,865,892
Change in Stormwater Utility Service Revenue 1,355,391
Change in Interest Income 147,915
Other Operating Revenues 1,648,000
Impact Fees —
Bond Proceeds —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 3,151,306 23,017,198
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 22,947,474 43.42
Personnel Services 2.36 434,598
Operating & Maintenance 279,400
Charges for Service 510,502
Capital Outlay (699,500)
Capital Improvements 4,749,000
Cost of Bond Issuance —
Debt Service (61,878)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 45.78 5,212,122 28,159,596
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
68 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (5,142,398)
Airport Fund (FC 540)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY 23 Beginning Balance 403,513,000
Increase in operating revenues 132,417,500
Increase in passenger facility charges —
Increase in grants and reimbursements 51,645,600
Increase in customer facility charges 248,000
Increase in airport general revenue bonds —
Increase in interest income (2,520,200)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 181,790,900 585,303,900
Expenses and Other Uses
FY 23 Beginning Balance 520,438,997 639.3
Increase in operating expenses 25.00 23,178,400
Decrease in Passenger Incentive Rebate 7,140,400
Decrease in interest expense 45,595,000
Decrease in bond expense 665,100
Increase in capital equipment 6,892,800
Decrease in capital improvements projects (27,515,600)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 664.3 (553,060,700) 576,395,097
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 8,908,803
Waste and Recycling Fund (FC 670)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 23,607,733
Residential Service Fee Increase 1,619,837
Glass Recycling Fee Increase 18,780
Decrease in Debt Financing Proceeds and Misc Revenue (4,251,433)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (2,612,816) 20,994,917
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 25,617,162 57.00
Salary Changes 323,906
Capital Purchase Decrease (4,013,500)
PUBS Allocation 889,104
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
69 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Fleet Fuel and CNG Decrease (44,700)
Tipping Fee Increase 258,000
Fleet Maintenance Increase 221,524
Lease Debt Payment Decrease (30,838)
Increase in Operating and Admin Expense 107,968 1,380,896
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 57.00 (2,288,536) 23,328,626
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (2,009,429)
Environment and Energy Fund (FC670)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,632,726
Misc Revenue 34,751
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 34,751 1,667,477
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 2,646,630 8.00
Salary Changes 62,637
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 8.00 62,637 2,709,267
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (1,041,790)
Golf Fund - Operations (FC 680)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 10,960,213
Green Fees 631,236
Driving Range 81,416
Cart Rental (18,928)
Retail Sales 36,700
Other 136,636
General Fund Transfer (IMS, Admin Fees) —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 867,060 11,827,273
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 10,818,337 34.15
Personnel Changes 432,841
Retail Merchandise 36,275
Operating Supplies 63,156
Increase for Utilities 194,767
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
70 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Charges and Services 438,670
Operating Equipment Cash Purchases 239,688
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 34.15 1,405,397 12,223,734
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (396,461)
Golf Fund - CIP Dedicated (FC 680)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,749,854
Green Fees 38,903
Other (15,000)
Transfer from GF for ESCO 17,786
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 41,689 1,791,543
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 7,120,647
Debt Service Payments (ESCO) 17,786
Capital Expenditures 1,098,780
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 0 1,116,566 8,237,213
Budgeted revenues and other sources over 2,521,963
(under) expenditures and other uses 20,460,947 (6,445,670)
Emergency 911 (FC 750)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 3,925,000
No Change —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 3,925,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 3,800,385
VESTA Analytics Enterprize Contract (Revenue Offset) 113,200
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 113,200 3,913,585
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 11,415
Fleet Management (FC 610) - Maintenance
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 18,073,651
Fuel revenue impact (546,400)
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
71 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Work Order billings 1,773,794
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,227,394 19,301,045
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 18,428,983 46.00
Personnel Changes 311,845
Annualized BA4 FY24 added 3.0 FTE salary 3.00 286,200
On-going BA4 FY24 Fleet Mechanics 3.0 FTE costs 40,800
Fuel impact (533,770)
Combined inflationary factor 1,277,298
Air-time for 500 on-going GPS units 108,000
Life Style Savings Account —
Car wash debris clean out decreased (28,500)
Misc. internal Fleet efficiencies (233,828)
Replacement vehicle prep, parts, outsourced labor & admin (77,647)
Transfer to GF from Fund Class 61 for Non Departmental 1,407,038
Total Expenses and Other Uses Budget 49.00 2,557,436 20,986,419
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (1,685,374)
Fleet Management (FC 610) - Replacement
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 14,035,318
Transfer from GF for vehicles for new positions 657,993
Reduction of GF for vehicles for new positions (FY 24) (1,043,350)
Reduction of FOF funding (5,700,000)
Reduction of vehicle lease proceeds (1,000,000)
Increase in sale of vehicles (FY 25) 11,285
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (7,074,072) 6,961,246
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 14,069,767
Decrease in debt service (719,170)
Remove one-time funding for cash purchases (FY 24) (1,043,350)
Increase in cash purchases for vehicles 696,006
Reduction of vehicle leases (1,000,000)
New cash purchases for vehicles (5,700,000)
New GF cash purchases for vehicles for new positions 657,993
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 0 (7,108,521) 6,961,246
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
72 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses —
Information Management Services (FC 650)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 36,254,357
Change in Transfer from General Fund 4,271,925
Appropriation of Fund Balance —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,271,925 40,526,282
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 38,702,171 100.00
Personnel Changes (Base to Base) — 261,823
Insurance Rate Changes 252,321
Pension Changes 63,923
Annual Salary Proposal (COLA) 528,926
CCAC Study 154,675
One Time Funding from FY23 (2,060,000)
FY24 Ongoing Budget Amendments 397,688
Reduction Strategy (1,000,000)
Contractual Changes 1,566,767
Inflationary Changes 783,293
PSB Improvements 196,382
Radio Replacement 500,000
Computers and Software for New FTE with other departments 43,500
New Positions
Privacy Officer (Grade 34) (10 Months) 1.00 134,813
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 101.00 1,824,111 40,526,282
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation (FC 785)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 9,700,000
Remove FY2021 State Initiated County Local Option Sales Tax —
Revenue —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 9,700,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 9,700,000 0
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
73 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Transfer to General Fund for Personnel 49,782
Remove FY2023 Transfer to CIP (8,191,470)
Remove FY2023 Transfer to Debt Services (1,100,000)
Transfer to CIP - Projects 8,200,000
Transfer to Debt Services 1,100,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 0 58,312 9,758,312
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (58,312)
CDBG Operating (FC 710)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 5,597,763
Change in Federal Funds (112,248)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (112,248) 5,485,515
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 5,597,763
Change in Federal Funds (112,248)
Change in Transfer to Housing —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (112,248) 5,485,515
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
Misc. Grants Operating (FC 720)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 8,919,917
Change in Federal Grant Revenue —
Change in Program Income —
Change in Appropriation of Cash —
Change in ARPA Funding (4,025,707)
State transportation (HB488) Green Bike 1,750,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (2,275,707) 6,644,210
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 8,919,917
Change in Salary and Benefits 0
American Rescue Plan Grant
- Revenue Replacement [Transfer to General Fund] 0
- Salary Restoration 0
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
74 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
- Other (4,025,707)
Appropriation of HOME Program Income —
State transportation (HB488) Green Bike 1,750,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (2,275,707) 6,644,210
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses —
Other Special Revenue Fund (FC730)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 400,000
Transfer from GF - Environmental Assessment Fund 100,000
Transfer from GF - Emergency Demolition Revolving Fund (100,000)
Weed Abatement FY2024 Appropriation of Cash
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 400,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 400,000
Environmental Assessment Fund 100,000
Emergency Demolition Revolving Fund [One-Time] (100,000)
Add FY2024 Weed Abatement
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 400,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses —
Donation Fund (FC 770)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 500,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 500,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 500,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 500,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
75 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Housing (FC 690)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 14,659,043
Change in Transfer from CDBG —
Change in Program Income —
Change in Interest Income 4,000
Change in Miscellaneous Income/Sale of Property —
Change in Appropriation of Cash (8,217,432)
Change in Loan Principal and Escrow Payments 13,000
Change in Transfer to General Fund (1,039,611)
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (9,240,043) 5,419,000
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 10,212,043
Change in Loan Disbursements and Associated Expenses —
Change in Funding Our Futures Expenses —
Change in Other Expenses (3,828,432)
Change in Interest Expense 5,000
Change in Note Payable & T&I Payments 70,000
Change in Transfer to General Fund —
Change in Transfer to RDA Fund —
Change in Transfer to CDBG Fund (1,039,611)
Appropriation from Program Income —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (4,793,043) 5,419,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
Debt Service (FC 101)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 32,341,586
Change in G.O. Property Tax (745,852)
Change in State Reimbursement —
Change in Debt Service from RDA (9,138)
Change in Transfer from Transportation —
Change in Transfer from General Fund (1,435,351)
Change in Transfer from CIP —
Change in Lease Payments 336,154
Change in Transfer from Refuse 272,413
Change in Transfer from Fleet 291,272
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
76 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (1,290,501) 31,051,085
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 34,894,979
Change in Debt Service Payments and related expenses (536,945)
Remove One-Time Transfer Out from North Temple Viaduct Bond RDA Reimbursement to North Temple Project Area —
Lease Payments (1,102,000)
One-time transfer out from North Temple to Housing (1,700,000)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (3,338,945) 31,556,034
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses (504,949)
Governmental Immunity (FC 630)
Revenue and Other Sources 3,888,581
New Revenue Options
Revenues from other funds 200,000
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 200,000 4,088,581
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2023 Beginning Balance 3,370,012 9.00
Salary Changes 476,751
Professional Development 48,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 9.00 524,751 3,894,763
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 193,818
Insurance and Risk Fund (FC 620)
Revenue and Other Sources 60,932,137
New Revenue Options
Change in amount from GF 468,171
Change in Amount from Other Funds 3,748,801
Insurance Changes
One-time Health Premiums (3,457,033)
Remove One-Time
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 759,939 65,149,109
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2023 Beginning Balance 63,574,655 7.70
Salary Changes 235,194
Personnel Adjustments 25,015
Remove Transfer out of Fund Balance for Premium Holiday FY2024 (3,457,033)
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
77 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Vehicle Purchase 55,000
Fuel 3,500
Insurance Increase 3,212,778
Workers Compensation Change 1,500,000
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 7.70 1,574,454 65,149,109
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses —
OTHER FUND KEY CHANGES
Fiscal Year 2025
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget
Full Time Equivalent
Changes from FY2024 Budget
FY2025 Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
78 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
LBA KEY CHANGES
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget FY2025 Budget
Local Building Authority (FC660)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,517,400
Change in Building Lease Revenue (336,600)
Change in Transfers from General Fund (4,675)
Change in Transfer from CIP Impact Fee
Appropriation of Cash —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (341,275) 1,176,125
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,517,400
Change in Debt Service (341,275)
Change in Project Costs —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (341,275) 1,176,125
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses — —
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
79 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Central Business District
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 24,644,694 2,621,013 27,265,707
Interest Income — 1,841,006 1,841,006
Prior Year Transition Holding Account — 786,303 786,303
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 24,644,694 5,248,322 29,893,016
Expenses and Other Uses
Taxing Entity Payment 9,621,707 1,572,608 11,194,315
Eccles Debt Service 5,165,109 — 5,165,109
Eccles Debt Service Block 70 RDA Match 3,311,921 — 3,311,921
Transfer to Administration 2,464,469 262,101 2,726,570
TI Reimbursements (Jazz Arena, 222 Main) 1,300,000 — 1,300,000
Property Maintenance & Management 1,000,000 127,250 1,127,250
Gallivan Maintenance 573,975 17,832 591,807
Gallivan Administration 372,775 12,672 385,447
Gallivan Programming 250,000 — 250,000 Parking Ramp Leases (included in Misc Prop Exp) 75,000 (75,000) — Capital Reserves - Strategic Intervention Fund — 2,540,597 2,540,597
PRJ-NEW Capital Project - Gallivan Playground — 500,000 500,000
PRJ-NEW Capital Project - Japantown Art — 300,000 300,000
PRJ-000057 Capital Project - Maintenance & Repairs — 250,000 250,000
PRJ-NEW Capital Project - CBD Public Art — 150,000 150,000
PRJ-NEW Capital Project - Japantown Construction Docs — 100,000 100,000
PRJ-000061 Capital Project - Gallivan Master Planning 509,738 (509,738) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 24,644,694 5,248,322 29,893,016
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
West Capitol Hill
Revenue and Other Sources
Interest Income — 384,332 384,332
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 384,332 384,332
Expenses and Other Uses
PRJ-000015 Capital Project - Arctic Court Infill Home Construction — 384,332 384,332
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
80 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 384,332 384,332
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
West Temple Gateway
Revenue and Other Sources
Interest Income — — —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — — —
Expenses and Other Uses
Transfer to Administration — — —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — — —
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Depot District
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 5,422,435 770,663 6,193,098
Interest Income — 480,304 480,304
Prior Year Transition Holding Account 1,805,473 (1,383,474) 421,999
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 7,227,908 (132,507) 7,095,401
Expenses and Other Uses
Transfer to Primary Housing Fund 1,084,487 154,133 1,238,620
Transfer to Administration 813,365 115,600 928,965
Property Maintenance & Management 150,000 22,500 172,500
Charges & Services — 50,000 50,000
TI Reimbursement Gateway — — —
Transfer to Secondary Housing 1,000,000 (1,000,000) —
Capital Reserve - Infrastructure Improvements 3,680,056 25,260 3,705,316
Capital Reserve - Commercial Assistance Program 500,000 — 500,000
PRJ-000064 Capital Project - Home Inn Rio Grande Maintenance — 500,000 500,000
and
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 7,227,908 (132,507) 7,095,401
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
81 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Granary District
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 1,103,309 281,124 1,384,433
Interest Income — 198,730 198,730
Prior Year Transition Holding Account 291,284 (126,198) 165,086
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,394,593 353,656 1,748,249
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Reserve - Commercial Assistance Program 1,003,435 260,262 1,263,697
Transfer to Primary Housing Fund 220,662 56,224 276,886
Transfer to Administration 165,496 42,170 207,666
Property Maintenance & Management 5,000 (5,000) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,394,593 353,656 1,748,249
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
North Temple
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 1,008,715 535,030 1,543,745
Prior Year Transition Holding Account 343,277 (93,385) 249,892
Interest Income — 158,829 158,829
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,351,992 600,474 1,952,466
Expenses and Other Uses
Transfer to Primary Housing Fund 201,743 107,006 308,749
Transfer to Administration 100,872 130,689 231,561
Charges & Services — 50,000 50,000
Property Maintenance & Management — 50,000 50,000
Capital Reserve - Strategic Intervention 285,490 576,322 861,812
PRJ-NEW Capital Project - NT Property Reuse Planning — 300,000 300,000
PRJ-000086 Capital Project - School Construction Fund 70,610 29,734 100,344
PRJ-000022 Capital Project - City Creek Daylighting 50,000 — 50,000
Capital Reserve - Commercial Assistance Program 543,277 (543,277) —
Capital Reserve - Infrastructure Improvements 100,000 (100,000) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,351,992 600,474 1,952,466
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
82 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
Block 70
Revenue and Other Sources
Transfer From CBD Taxing Entity Payments 5,165,109 — 5,165,109
Transfer From CBD Eccles Debt Service RDA match 3,311,921 — 3,311,921
Tax Increment 1,829,228 304,764 2,133,992
Reserve for Eccles Debt 747,501 (293,359) 454,142
Interest Income — — —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 11,053,759 11,405 11,065,164
Expenses and Other Uses
Regent Street Bond Debt Service 8,071,024 (1,495) 8,069,529
Eccles Theater Debt Service 1,528,967 46,172 1,575,139
Taxing Entity Payments 548,768 11,405 560,173
Regent Street Maintenance 80,000 — 80,000
PRJ-000083 Capital Reserve - Eccles Theater Ancillary Spaces Ops 475,000 — 475,000
PRJ-000082 Capital Reserve - Eccles Fundraising Fulfillment 125,000 — 125,000
PRJ-000084 Capital Reserve - Regent Street Parking Structure 100,000 — 100,000
PRJ-NEW Capital Project - Reinstallation of "The Gulls" — 55,323 55,323
PRJ-000085 Capital Reserve - Regent Street Event Programming 25,000 — 25,000
PRJ-000022 Capital Project - Bennion Jewelers Relocation 100,000 (100,000) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 11,053,759 11,405 11,065,164
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
\North Temple Viaduct
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 2,774,419 345,371 3,119,790
Interest Income — 35,975 35,975
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 2,774,419 381,346 3,155,765
Expenses and Other Uses
Debt Service Payment to Salt Lake City 2,732,803 376,166 3,108,969
Transfer to Admin 41,616 5,180 46,796
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
83 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2,774,419 381,346 3,155,765
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Northwest Quadrant
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 1,398,548 1,101,561 2,500,109
Interest Income — 103,889 103,889
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,398,548 1,205,450 2,603,998
Expenses and Other Uses
TI Reimbursement NWQ Phase I 978,984 771,092 1,750,076
Transfer to Admin 139,855 110,156 250,011
Transfer to Primary Housing 139,855 110,156 250,011
PRJ-000087 Capital Reserve - NWQ Shared Costs 139,854 214,046 353,900
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,398,548 1,205,450 2,603,998
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Stadler Rail
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 141,297 19,854 161,151
Interest Income — 7,593 7,593
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 141,297 27,447 168,744
Expenses and Other Uses
TI Reimbursement 120,102 24,469 144,571
Transfer to Primary Housing 14,130 1,985 16,115
Transfer to Admin 7,065 993 8,058
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 141,297 27,447 168,744
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
State Street
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 4,423,811 1,445,048 5,868,859
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
84 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Prior Year Transition Holding Account 1,364,709 (715,732) 648,977
Interest Income — — —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 5,788,520 729,316 6,517,836
Expenses and Other Uses
Transfer to Secondary Housing — 1,000,000 1,000,000
Transfer to Admin 442,381 43,379 485,760
Taxing Entity Payments — 341,296 341,296
Transfer to Primary Housing 182,405 129,237 311,642
Transfer to Primary Housing - SLCSD HSG 259,976 15,268 275,244
Charges & Services — 50,000 50,000
Property Maintenance & Management — 50,000 50,000
Capital Reserve - Strategic Intervention 3,364,709 639,185 4,003,894
Capital Reserve - Commercial Assistance Programs 1,239,049 (1,239,049) —
PRJ-000051 Capital Project - Ballpark Next Planning 300,000 (300,000) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 5,788,520 729,316 6,517,836
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
9 Line
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment 2,653,781 376,934 3,030,715
Prior Year Transition Holding Account 802,208 (525,705) 276,503
Interest Income — — —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 3,455,989 (148,771) 3,307,218
Expenses and Other Uses
Taxing Entity Payments (SLCo.) 295,882 50,086 345,968
Transfer to Admin (City & SLCSD only) 253,543 10,363 263,906
Transfer to Primary Housing 144,592 16,342 160,934
Transfer to Primary Housing - SLCSD HSG 120,786 21,352 142,138
Charges & Services — 50,000 50,000
Property Maintenance & Management — 50,000 50,000
County Administration (now included in Taxing Entity Payments) 35,506 (35,506) —
Capital Reserve - Strategic Intervention 500,000 1,494,272 1,994,272
PRJ-New Capital Project - 9-Line Public Art 150,000 150,000 300,000
Capital Reserve - Commercial Assistance Programs 500,000 (500,000) —
Capital Program - Accessory Dwelling Units 1,455,680 (1,455,680) —
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
85 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 3,455,989 (148,771) 3,307,218
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Block 67 North CRA
Revenue and Other Sources
Tax Increment — 365,771 365,771
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget — 365,771 365,771
Expenses and Other UsesOperational ExpensesTI Reimbursements — 274,329 274,329
Transfer to Primary Housing — 36,577 36,577
Transfer to Admin — 18,288 18,288
PRJ-New Capital Reserves Project - Japantown Art — 36,577 36,577
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget — 365,771 365,771
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Revolving Loan Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
Principal Payments 196,750 55,250 252,000
Interest on Loans 30,000 50,400 80,400
Interest on Investment — — —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 226,750 105,650 332,400
Expenses and Other Uses
Additional Funds Available to Lend 226,750 105,650 332,400
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 226,750 105,650 332,400
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Program Income Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
Parking Structure Income 1,242,336 47,848 1,290,184
Rents 161,264 68,185 229,449
Loan Repayments 38,640 (5,040) 33,600
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
86 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Interest on Loans 7,452 (1,452) 6,000
Interest Income — — —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,449,692 109,541 1,559,233
Expenses and Other Uses
Charges & Services 330,000 127,500 457,500
Operating & Maintenance 330,000 33,000 363,000
Marketing and Sales (now included in O & M) 25,000 (25,000) —
PRJ-000078 Capital Reserve - Sugarhouse DI Demolition 550,000 (50,000) 500,000
PRJ-000057 Capital Reserve - Gallivan Maintenance & Repairs 214,692 24,041 238,733
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,449,692 109,541 1,559,233
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — —
Secondary Housing Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
Transfer In from State Street — 1,000,000 1,000,000
Transfer from Depot District 1,000,000 (1,000,000) 0
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,000,000 — 1,000,000
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Reserve - Competitive Housing Development (CHD) Loan Pool — 1,000,000 1,000,000
Capital Reserve - Partnership with SLCo. Sunday-Andersron Senior Center Housing Project [One-time] 1,000,000 (1,000,000) 0
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,000,000 — 1,000,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources
over/ (under) expenses and other uses — 0
9245 Primary Housing Dev/Loan Fund
Revenue and Other Sources
Loan Payments - Interest 2,379 3,441 5,820
Loan Payments - Principal 23,567 48,433 72,000
Transfer In from 9-Line 265,378 37,694 303,072
Transfer In from Block 67 North — 36,577 36,577
Transfer In from Block 70 — — —
Transfer In from Central Business District — — —
Transfer In from Depot District 1,084,487 154,133 1,238,620
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
87 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Transfer In from Granary District 220,662 56,224 276,886
Transfer In from North Temple 201,743 107,006 308,749
Transfer In from Northwest Quadrant 139,855 110,156 250,011
Transfer In from Stadler Rail 14,130 1,985 16,115
Transfer In from State Street 442,381 144,505 586,886
Transition Holding Account — 507,505 507,505
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 2,394,582 1,207,659 3,602,241
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Reserves Programs & Projects
Capital Reserves Program: HDLP - Competitive - {Holding Account}- 1,000,000 1,684,859 2,684,859
Capital Reserves Program: School District Required Family & Workforce Housing - {Holding Account}- 380,762 36,620 417,382
Captial Reserves Project - Housing Construction & Rehabilitation Program - {PRJ-000015 RDA - Arctic Court Infill Home Construction} -
— 500,000 500,000
Captial Reserves Project - Other Housing Program - {PRJ-000088 Sunday-Anderson Senior Center - SLCO Partnership} - 1,013,820 (1,013,820) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 2,394,582 1,207,659 3,602,241
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses — —
9248 Westside Community Initative
Revenue and Other Sources
Inland Port Housing 1,401,589 433,880 1,835,469
Transition Holding Account 433,880 (433,880) —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 1,835,469 — 1,835,469
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Reserves Programs & Projects
Capital Reserves Program: Strategic Intervention - {Holding Account}- — 1,000,000 1,000,000
Capital Reserves Program: Wealth Building Housing Opportunities - {Holding Account}- 1,135,469 (300,000) 835,469
Captial Reserves Project - Wealth Building Housing Opportunities Program - {PRJ-000089 Neighborworks for Shared Equity Workforce} -
700,000 (700,000) —
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
88 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 1,835,469 — 1,835,469
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses — —
9236 Housing Development Fund
Revenue and Other Sources — — —
Funding Our Future 1,840,000 750,000 2,590,000
Interest from Investments — — —
Loan Payments - Interest 76,563 31,437 108,000
Loan Payments - Principal 144,390 59,610 204,000
Transfer In from North Temple Viaduct 1,700,000 (1,700,000) —
Transfer In HOME Dormant Program Income Funds 6,476,014 (6,476,014) —
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 10,236,967 (7,334,967) 2,902,000
Expenses and Other Uses
Capital Reserves Programs & Projects
Capital Reserves Program: Accessory Dwelling Unit Program - {Holding Account}- 1,000,000 (1,000,000) —
Capital Reserves Program: HDLP - Competitive - {Holding Account}- 7,836,967 (6,934,967) 902,000
Capital Reserves Program: Wealth Building Housing Opportunities - {Holding Account}- — 2,000,000 2,000,000
Captial Reserves Project - Wealth Building Housing Opportunities Program - {PRJ-000089 Neighborworks for Shared Equity Workforce} -
1,400,000 (1,400,000) —
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 10,236,967 (7,334,967) 2,902,000
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0 —
9201 Redevelopment Agency Operations
Revenue and Other Sources
Transfer In from 9-Line 253,543 10,363 263,906
Transfer In from Block 67 North — 18,288 18,288
Transfer In from Block 70 — — —
Transfer In from Central Business District 2,464,469 262,101 2,726,570
Transfer In from Depot District 813,365 115,600 928,965
Transfer In from Granary District 165,496 42,170 207,666
Transfer In from North Temple 100,872 130,689 231,561
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
89 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Transfer In from North Temple Viaduct 41,616 5,180 46,796
Transfer In from Northwest Quadrant 139,855 110,156 250,011
Transfer In from Stadler Rail 7,065 993 8,058
Transfer In from State Street 442,381 43,379 485,760
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget 4,428,662 738,919 5,167,581
Expenses and Other Uses
Operations Programs 35.00
RDA Personnel 2,756,779 413,517 3,170,296
Administrative Fees 1,000,000 — 1,000,000
Charges & Services 296,883 153,117 450,000
Operating & Maintenance 375,000 75,000 450,000
Allocation to Fund Balance — 97,285 97,285
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget 4,428,662 35.00 641,634 5,167,581
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses — —
GRAND TOTALS
TOTAL Revenue 80,803,841 84,656,884
TOTAL Expense 80,803,841 84,656,884
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY KEY CHANGES
FUND FY2024 Adopted
Budget
Full Time
Equivalent
Changes from
FY2024 Budget
FY2025
Recommended
Budget
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
90 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
MULTI-AGENCY DRUG TASK FORCE KEY CHANGES
ISSUE FY2024 Adopted Budget Full Time Equivalent Changes from FY2024 Budget FY2025 Budget
Multi-Agency Drug Task Force (FC901)
Revenue and Other Sources
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,397,355
Remove FY2024 Funding (1,397,335)
Appropriation of Cash Balance from Forfeiture 36,852
Appropriation of Cash Balance from Restitution 1,037,361
Total Revenues and Other Sources Budget (323,122) 1,074,233
Expenses and Other Uses
FY2024 Beginning Balance 1,397,355
Remove FY2023 Expense (1,397,355)
Change in Operating Expense (1,074,233)
Total Expenditures and Other Uses Budget (323,102) 1,074,253
Budgeted revenues and other sources over
(under) expenditures and other uses 0
Salt Lake City Mayor’s Recommended Budget
91 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Financial
Policies
This page intentionally left blank
Debt Policies
The City's debt policy is defined by State statute with the goal of maintaining the
City's “Aaa/AAA” general obligation bond ratings, as rated by Moody's and Fitch
respectively, or other rating agencies. Accordingly, the City will continually monitor
all outstanding debt issues, as well as trends in key economic, demographic and
financial data, including a periodic review of important debt ratios and debt
indicators. The City will make all debt service payments in a timely and accurate
manner. The City will fully comply with all IRS arbitrage rebate requirements and
the bonds’ post issuance compliance regulations. In the preparation of official
statements or other bond related documents, the City will follow a policy of full and
complete disclosure of its financial and legal conditions.
The City's practice is to also adhere to the following guidelines:
1.State law limits general obligation bonded debt use for general
purposes to 4 percent of the adjusted fair market value of the City's
taxable property.
2.State law also limits general obligation bonded debt for water, sewer
and lighting purposes to 4 percent of the adjusted fair market value of
the property plus any unused portion of the amount available for
general purposes.
3.The City combines a pay-as-you-go strategy with long-term financing to
keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit the “Aaa/AAA” general
obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity
in an emergency.
4.The City limits debt to projects that cannot be reasonably funded in a
single year and to terms that are consistent with the useful life of the
project being undertaken.
5.The City seeks the least costly financing available. All debt commitments
are reviewed centrally by the City Treasurer who looks for opportunities
to combine issues or for alternative methods that will achieve the lowest
possible interest rates and other borrowing costs.
6.The City will continually analyze whether it would be advantageous to
refund bond issues based on market and budgetary conditions.
7.The City will issue Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes only for the
purpose of meeting short-term cash flow liquidity needs. In order to
exempt the notes from arbitrage rebate, the sizing of the notes and the
timing of cash flows will meet the “safe harbor” provisions of Federal
Tax Code.
8.The City will invest bond and note proceeds as well as all funds that are
pledged or dedicated to the payment of debt service on those bonds or
notes either in accordance with the terms of the borrowing instruments,
or if silent or less restrictive, then according to the terms and conditions
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
95 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
of the Utah State Money Management Act and Rules of the State Money
Management Council.
9.The City will maintain outstanding debt at a level such that revenues are
equal to or greater than 200% of the maximum annual debt service.
10.The City currently has $136,340,000 of outstanding general obligation
debt. This is well below the 4 percent (of fair market value) statutory
limits, which places the City’s general obligation borrowing limit at
$2,461,971,515. The City currently does not use general obligation debt
for water, sewer or lighting purposes. However, the full 8% may be used
for water, sewer and electric purposes but if it is so used, then no general
obligation bonds may be issued in excess of 8% for any purpose.
Legal Debt Margin:General Purposes
4%
Water, sewer, and
lighting
4%
Total
8%
General Obligation
Debt Limit $ 2,461,971,515 $ 2,461,971,515 $ 4,923,943,031
Less Outstanding
General Obligation
Bonds
$ (136,340,000) $ — $ (136,340,000)
Legal Debt Margin $ 2,325,631,515 $ 2,461,971,515 $ 4,787,603,031
2022 Fair market value of property -- $61,549,287,882
Source: Utah State Property Tax Division
SIGNIFICANT FUTURE DEBT PLANS Lease Revenue
Bonds, Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds
The City administration continuously evaluates the City’s funding of its Capital
Improvement Program, and proceeds of sales and excise tax revenue bonds will
be considered as one of the sources for funding the City’s capital infrastructure.
Currently, the City has no short-term plans to issue lease revenue bonds nor sales
and excise tax revenue bonds.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA (SAA)
The City has no short-term plans to issue assessment area bonds.
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
Currently, the City has no plans to hold a special bond election.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
96 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
MAJOR PROGRAMS AND FUTURE
DEBT CONSIDERATIONS
The City plans to issue an RFP for an interim credit facility not to exceed $300
million in calendar year 2024 related to the $5.13 billion “New SLC” formerly known
as the Airport Redevelopment Program. The interim credit facility is planned to be
refunded with a future general airport revenue bond issuance in the subsequent
year. The program is currently expected to be completed by 2026.
Public Utilities revenue bonds of up to $204 million are expected to be issued in
FY2025 to fund the Department of Public Utilities capital improvement program. A
major focus of the Department’s budget is the rehabilitation and replacement of
aging infrastructure. The largest planned projects are the continued work on the
new water reclamation facility to meet regulatory requirements, capital
construction and improvements to three water treatment plants, improvements
for storage reservoirs, phased construction of a new water conveyance line to
expand service and provide redundancy, and water, sewer, and storm water utility
infrastructure work. The Department will also be utilizing proceeds from a
$348,635,000 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan secured
to finance the construction of the water reclamation facility. The loan will be
drawn through 2026. The current outlook includes issuance of approximately $254
million in Public Utilities revenue bonds from FY 2026 through FY 2029 to fund
planned capital construction.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
97 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEBT STRUCTURE
Salt Lake City Outstanding Debt Issues
(RDA bond information has been excluded from this list)
(as of June 30, 2024)
Amount of Final Principal
Original Issue Maturity Date Outstanding
GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT
Series 2010B (Public Safety Facilities)$ 100,000,000 6/15/2031 $ 39,915,000
Series 2013A (Refunded a portion of Series 2004A) 6,395,000 6/15/2024 —
Series 2015A (Refund 2013B Sports Complex) 14,615,000 6/15/2028 4,655,000
Series 2017B (Refund Portion of 2010A) 12,920,000 6/15/2030 8,410,000
Series 2019 (Streets) (Refund Series 2017A) 22,840,000 6/15/2039 13,475,000
Series 2020 (Streets) 17,745,000 6/15/2040 11,700,000
Series 2021 (Streets) 20,660,000 6/15/2041 15,620,000
Series 2022 (Streets) 21,785,000 6/15/2042 18,715,000
Series 2023 (Parks, Trails & Open Space) 24,765,000 6/15/2043 23,850,000
TOTAL:$ 136,340,000
PUBLIC UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS
Series 2009 (Taxable) 6,300,000 2/1/2031 2,205,000
Series 2010 Revenue Bonds 12,000,000 2/1/2031 4,760,000
Series 2011 Revenue Bonds 8,000,000 2/1/2027 1,705,000
Series 2012 Improvement and Refunding '04 Bonds 28,565,000 2/1/2027 1,745,000
Series 2017 Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding (2008) 72,185,000 2/1/2037 54,445,000
Series 2020 Revenue Bonds 157,390,000 2/1/2050 157,390,000
Series 2020B Improvement Bonds (WIFIA loan) Revenue Bonds 348,635,000 8/1/2058 13,112,998.85
Series 2022 Revenue Bonds 329,025,000 2/1/2052 329,025,000
TOTAL:$ 564,387,998.85
SALES AND EXCISE TAX REVENUE BONDS
Series 2014B (CIP Projects) 10,935,000 10/1/2034 6,945,000
Series 2016A (Refund 2009A) 21,715,000 10/1/2028 11,755,000
Series 2019A (Refund 2007A) 2,620,000 4/1/2027 975,000
Series 2019B (Refund 2013A) (Federally Taxable) 58,540,000 4/1/2038 56,300,000
Series 2021 (Refund 2013B, LBA 2013A & 2014A) 15,045,000 10/1/2034 14,305,000
Series 2022A (Refunding 2012A) 8,900,000 10/1/2032 7,705,000
Series 2022 B 40,015,000 10/1/2042 40,015,000
Series 2022 C (Federally Taxable) 24,240,000 10/1/2032 22,315,000
TOTAL:$ 160,315,000
LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY LEASE REVENUE BONDS
Series 2016A (Fire Station #14) 6,755,000 4/15/2037 4,940,000
Series 2017A (Fire Station #3) 8,115,000 4/15/2038 6,630,000
TOTAL:$ 11,570,000
AIRPORT REVENUE BONDS
Series 2017A 826,210,000 7/1/2047 808,925,000
Series 2017B 173,790,000 7/1/2047 169,590,000
Series 2018A 753,855,000 7/1/2048 729,855,000
Series 2018B $ 96,695,000 7/1/2048 $ 96,695,000
Series 2021A 776,925,000 7/1/2051 773,900,000
Series 2021B 127,645,000 7/1/2051 127,280,000
Series 2023 600,000,000 7/1/2053 600,000,000
TOTAL:$ 3,306,245,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
98 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2024-25 Revenue
This section includes a general discussion of Salt Lake City's major revenue
sources. The City has eight major funds: General Fund, Golf Fund, Refuse Fund,
Water Fund, Sewer Fund, Storm Water Fund, Street Lighting Fund, Airport Fund,
and the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Fund. These funds and their major revenue
sources are discussed below.
REVENUE POLICIES
1.The City projects its annual revenue through analytical processes and adopts
its budget using conservative estimates and long-term forecasting.
2.The City minimizes using one-time revenue to fund programs incurring
ongoing costs.
3.Once taxes and fees are assessed, the City aggressively collects all revenues
due.
4.The City pursues abatement programs and other ways to reduce the effect of
taxes and fees on those least able to pay.
5.To the extent that the City’s revenue base is insufficient to fund current
services, the City will explore all potential options to reduce the cost of
government services; examine the effect of reducing the level of government
services; and finally, consider new user fees or increases in existing fees.
Should these three alternatives fail to offer a suitable solution, the City may
increase tax rates as a last resort.
6.The City reviews the budget for those programs that user fees can
reasonably fund. This review results in a policy that defines cost, specifies a
percentage of the cost to be offset by a fee, and establishes a rationale for
the percentage. When establishing these programs, the City considers the
following:
a.Market pricing;
b.Increased costs associated with rate changes;
c.The ability of users to pay;
d.The ability of individuals to make choices between using the service
and paying the fee or not using the service;
e.Other policy considerations. (For example, setting fines high enough to
serve as a deterrent; or pricing fees to even out demand for services.)
7.The City adjusts user fee rates annually based on an analysis of the criteria
established in policy six above. The City pursues frequent small increases as
opposed to infrequent large increases.
8.The City considers revenue initiatives consistent with the following:
a.Finding alternatives that address service demands created by the City's
large daytime population;
b.Finding alternatives that allocate an equitable portion of service costs
to tax-exempt institutions;
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
99 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
c.Finding alternatives to formulas that use residential population to
distribute key revenues such as sales tax and gasoline tax; and
d.Pursuing opportunities for citizen volunteerism and public/private
partnerships.
FORECASTING METHODOLOGY
Salt Lake City revenue forecasts are compiled using historical, time-series, trend,
and simulation models. These models focus primarily on past experiences and
trends, but modifications are made based on simulations reflecting anticipated
economic activities and proposed initiatives. The projected revenues using these
models are based upon anticipated economic growth, anticipated fee or tax
increases, as well as any new initiatives being proposed.
The City has several financial analysts that regularly track and report on revenue
collections and projections. Projections are monitored for precision, and revisions
are made throughout the year. This information is used to help forecast the
upcoming year’s revenue.
As part of the City’s modeling efforts, year-to-date cumulative revenue collections
are monitored and compared to previous years to identify changes in revenue
streams that may indicate areas of concern.
GENERAL FUND
The General Fund is the principal fund of the City and is used to account for
resources traditionally associated with governments that are not required to be
accounted for in another fund. The General Fund accounts for the normal activities
of the City, such as Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks and Community Development.
These activities are funded through taxes, fees, fines, and charges for services.
The majority of the City’s General Fund revenue comes from three sources - sales
taxes $177,400,679 (37.33%), property taxes $116,996,349 (24.62%), and licenses
and permits $38,989,245 (8.2%). These sources are impacted by local and national
economic trends and activities. Major increases or decreases in any one of these
three taxes can have a significant impact on City operations.
SALES TAX
Sales tax revenue is a principal source of Salt Lake City's General Fund revenue,
providing 37.33% of total projected revenue in FY 24-25. Sales tax revenue is
projected to increase in FY 24-25 as a result of healthy retail spending and an
increase in accommodations and food services spending. Sales tax revenue is
forecast using time series and trend analysis in conjunction with various modeling
scenarios which anticipate economic events that may impact the City. The forecast
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
100 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
includes comparing the State of Utah’s projections with the City’s projections to
determine if the City’s projections are reasonable.
PROPERTY TAX
Property tax revenue is a significant source of Salt Lake City’s General Fund
revenue, providing 24.62% of total projected revenue in FY 24-25. Property tax
revenue is projected to increase slightly in FY 24-25.
Salt Lake County calculates the Certified Tax Rate and expected revenue for each
taxing entity. State Tax Code requires taxing entities to adopt the county’s property
tax revenue forecast as their own unless they go through the truth-in-taxation
process and raise the rate above the certified rate.
LICENSES AND PERMITS
License and Permit revenue is another major source of General Fund revenue,
comprising 8.2% of projected General Fund revenue in FY 24-25. This revenue is
forecast using time series and trend analysis, as well as input from business and
construction representatives. License revenue includes various business taxes,
such as airport parking and transient room taxes, that are projected to increase
over the previous year. Permit revenue is expected to decrease in FY 24-25 due to
the slow trend of construction activity in the City.
OTHER GENERAL FUND REVENUE
The remaining General Fund revenues make up 30.16% of the total and are
comprised of the following:
a.Franchise Taxes
b.Intergovernmental Revenue
c.Charges, Fees, and Rentals
d.Fines
e.Parking Meter Collections
f.Interest Income
g.Miscellaneous Revenue, Transfers and Interfund Reimbursements.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
101 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The following table summarizes total General Fund Revenue by major category.
GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Property Taxes 94,654,243 99,342,715 99,474,985 103,862,288 113,256,864 114,514,375 116,996,349
Sales and Use Taxes 99,599,360 116,199,002 122,654,953 160,262,167 172,197,395 166,213,479 177,400,679
Franchise Taxes 27,042,921 26,863,146 23,952,168 11,750,309 12,756,596 12,348,127 14,450,000
Licenses and Permits 36,960,240 32,637,293 36,428,067 43,313,623 43,946,412 40,878,104 38,989,245
Intergovernmental Revenue 6,006,496 5,086,254 4,781,753 5,960,591 5,936,546 5,134,621 5,954,017
Charges, Fees, and Rentals 5,573,679 4,283,760 4,842,902 5,840,601 5,811,594 4,881,922 6,886,113
Fines 5,140,777 3,753,706 3,539,471 3,717,871 3,519,427 4,063,548 4,435,035
Parking Meter Collections 3,509,898 2,771,331 1,915,888 2,997,333 2,616,322 2,801,089 2,701,331
Interest Income 3,904,270 2,910,778 821,887 1,346,160 12,352,554 8,000,000 8,000,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 5,256,974 4,521,107 2,834,061 7,871,697 4,680,506 3,502,359 3,298,277
Interfund Reimbursement 16,363,850 20,574,064 20,971,348 21,717,361 25,857,508 26,131,213 32,128,467
General Fund Revenue 304,012,708 318,943,156 322,217,484 368,640,001 402,931,724 402,931,724 411,239,513
Other Financing Sources:
Transfers 7,564,418 6,800,493 8,447,676 19,920,935 51,822,650 9,938,944 5,495,833
Proceeds from Sale of Property — — — 25,554 10,300
Revenue and Financing Sources 311,577,126 325,743,648 330,665,160 388,560,936 454,779,928 398,407,781 416,745,646
Property Tax for RDA*10,284,464 13,245,339 14,020,140 15,456,918 15,445,980 15,545,000 19,220,752
Available Fund Balance/Cash Reserves 380,025 1,510,094 4,885,620 25,527,005 25,135,631 30,552,142 39,278,680
Total General Fund 322,241,615 340,499,081 349,570,920 429,544,859 495,361,539 444,504,923 475,245,078
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
102 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
GENERAL FUND REVENUE SOURCES
Available Fund Balance/Cash Reserves Property Tax for RDA*
Proceeds from Sale of Property Transfers
Interfund Reimbursement Miscellaneous Revenue
Interest Income Parking Meter Collections
Fines Charges, Fees, and Rentals
Intergovernmental Revenue Licenses and Permits
Franchise Taxes Sales and Use Taxes
Property Taxes
Act
u
a
l
FY1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY2
2
-
2
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
FY2
3
-
2
4
Bu
d
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
50,000,000
100,000,000
150,000,000
200,000,000
250,000,000
300,000,000
350,000,000
400,000,000
450,000,000
500,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
103 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND
The Golf Enterprise Fund accounts for the operations at six public golf course
locations; Bonneville, Forest Dale, Glendale, Mountain Dell, Nibley Park, and
Rose Park.
The City’s golf courses are operated as an enterprise fund where revenue
collected at the golf course through user fees supports operational and
maintenance expenses, capital improvement costs, and any debt that the golf
courses may incur.
Revenue in this fund is generated by user fees, including green fees, CIP $2 fees,
cart rental fees, range ball fees, merchandise purchases, lessons, concessionaire
rental fees, etc. Revenue is projected based on historical patterns and forecasts of
trends in the local market area.
The FY 24-25 Golf Fund budget for revenue and expense follows closely with 5-year
historical averages and recent demand for golf rounds and merchandise. In
addition, strategic price increases are being implemented that will have an impact
on revenues for FY 24-25. Driving Range revenue increases will coincide with new
range building for winter use at Glendale.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
104 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
GOLF FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY 18-19 ActualFY 19-20 ActualFY 20-21 ActualFY 21-22 ActualFY 22-23 BudgetFY 23-24 Budget FY 24-25
Golf Revenue
Green Fees 3,569,078 4,259,235 5,525,522 5,495,684 5,459,247 5,033,052 5,664,288
Golf Car Rental 1,461,066 1,471,019 2,225,396 1,982,077 2,158,346 2,258,224 2,239,296
Driving Range Fees 322,722 223,848 472,678 460,253 486,405 652,620 734,036
Retail Merchandise Sales 781,478 646,749 827,626 981,853 1,062,790 1,024,000 1,060,700
CIP Fee on rounds, passes 298,724 324,383 395,791 568,048 763,447 724,427 763,330
Miscellaneous 1,038,407 1,417,090 2,235,387 2,807,165 3,625,855 3,017,744 3,157,166
Total Golf Fund 7,471,475 8,342,324 11,682,400 12,295,080 13,556,090 12,710,067 13,618,816
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
GOLF FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
Miscellaneous
CIP Fee on rounds, passes
Retail Merchandise Sales
Driving Range Fees
Golf Car Rental
Green Fees
Act
u
a
l
FY
1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY
1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY
2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY
2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY
2
2
-
2
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
FY
2
3
-
2
4
Bu
d
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
105 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
REFUSE ENTERPRISE FUND
The Refuse Enterprise Fund Class consists of two funds:
•Operations Fund
•Environmental & Energy Fund
Revenue for the Operations Fund comes from refuse collection fees, inter-fund
reimbursements, and miscellaneous revenue. City households that receive these
services include most single-family, duplex, and triplex homes. They are charged
refuse collection fees based on the size of their refuse can(s). These fees are
calculated to recover the fund’s operational costs when combined with the other
sources of revenue described above. The Operations Fund revenue is forecasted
based on known factors such as the number of refuse cans in service, along with
scheduled events such as equipment replacement and changes in contractual
agreements.
Voluntary residential curbside glass recycling service, introduced in FY 2012-13,
continues to be offered. Those using this service are charged a separate
monthly fee.
The Environmental & Energy (E&E) Fund receives an owner’s distribution from the
Landfill (Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Facility / SLVSWMF) on an
ongoing basis. This is the primary source of revenue for this fund. As the Landfill
garbage tonnage has decreased in recent years, so has the related dividend to its
partners. Revenues from recycling proceeds have been another source of revenue
in the past for this fund. Recycling proceeds have not been budgeted in FY 2024-25
due to the volatility of global recycling markets. Current, ongoing initiatives and
operational expenses are partially funded by landfill revenue and E&E cash
balance. Beginning in FY 2021-22, the E&E Division also began receiving revenue
from the General Fund. This amount has increased each year with the goal of fully
supporting the E&E Division through the General Fund in FY 2025-26.
In prior years, E&E Fund projects have been funded by one-time distributions from
the landfill. A distribution of $5,500,000 was put into the E&E Division in FY 2010-11
and funded projects on air quality, energy efficiency, sustainable food, and other
projects. In FY 2016-17, $1,500,000 of landfill distribution funds were transferred
from the Waste & Recycling Operations Division to the E&E Division to continue to
fund projects. In FY 2017-18, another one-time landfill distribution of $1,200,000
was received. No other one-time funding distributions from the landfill are
expected.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
106 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Refuse Fund Revenue Summary
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Refuse Revenue
Landfill / SLVSWMF Dividends 681,152 557,041 558,398 449,013 468,335 450,000 480,000
Refuse Collection Fees 11,397,708 11,223,400 11,209,725 12,580,305 14,445,610 15,809,733 17,448,349
Interfund Reimb. & Misc 1,766,089 1,235,243 639,909 1,711,293 2,877,789 2,210,726 2,087,477
Total Refuse Fund 13,844,949 13,015,684 12,408,032 14,740,611 17,791,734 18,470,459 20,015,826
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
REFUSE FUND REVENUE
Interfund Reimb & Misc
Refuse Collection Fees
Landfill / SLVSWMF Dividends
Act
u
a
l
FY1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY2
2
-
2
3
Bud
g
e
t
FY2
3
-
2
4
Bud
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
107 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WATER UTILITY FUND
The Water Utility Fund operates as an enterprise fund. The Water Utility exists to
provide treated water to current city residents, maintain the City’s water
infrastructure, and to engage in conservation activities related to the City’s water
supply for future generations. The service area of the fund covers a total of 141
square miles and includes more than 360,000 residents. The service area includes
the geographic area within the Salt Lake City boundaries, as well as the east bench
of the Salt Lake Valley outside Salt Lake City boundaries, including to portions of
the cities of Millcreek, Holladay, Cottonwood Heights, South Salt Lake, Murray, and
Midvale. The Water Utility also has jurisdictional responsibilities to protect about
190 square miles of source water area in the headwaters of the Wasatch
Mountains. The Water Utility provides administrative utility billing services for the
Sewer Utility, the Stormwater Utility, the Street Lighting Utility, the Refuse Fund,
and the Hive Program.
Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary billing rates needed to
generate enough revenue to fund the operations of the utility. Independent rate
studies are conducted every several years to gather public input and to structure
rates in accordance with industry standards and community values. Budgeted FY
2024-25 revenues reflect a proposed rate increase of 4% and water use is
anticipated to be similar to the current year. The rate increase is applied to the
current minimum charge and four-tiered, inclining block rate structure. The
proposed budget includes a rate stabilization fee based on meter size.
Revenue received from metered water usage is the Water Utility’s main source of
operating revenue (95%). Other revenue categories include interest income,
miscellaneous revenue, impact fees, and inter-fund reimbursements.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
108 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
WATER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Water Revenue
Water Sales and Service 75,103,958 81,995,776 84,073,083 74,116,952 84,618,018 94,343,390 121,710,205
Interest Income 1,424,203 970,343 658,820 (340,275) 4,073,479 456,502 463,989
Permits, Fines & Other 523,688 480,673 953,791 423,530 1,124,724 271,000 271,000
Interfund Billing Services 2,394,985 2,370,157 2,921,829 2,972,142 3,177,284 4,215,396 4,638,504
Total Water Fund 79,446,834 85,816,949 88,607,523 77,172,349 92,993,506 99,286,288 127,083,698
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
WATER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
Interfund Billing Services
Permits, Fines & Other
Interest Income
Water Sales and Service
Act
u
a
l
FY1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY2
2
-
2
3
Bud
g
e
t
FY2
3
-
2
4
Bud
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
2
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
8
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
109 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SEWER UTILITY FUND
The Sewer Utility Fund operates as an enterprise fund. The Sewer Utility exists to
manage the collection and treatment of wastewater within Salt Lake City’s
corporate boundaries. The Sewer Utility is increasing capacity and expanding the
service of the sewer collection system to meet growth requirements related to the
new State Correctional Facility, the Airport expansion, and new development
anticipated in the Northwest Quadrant of Salt Lake City. The Sewer Utility operates
the City’s sewer collection and sewer treatment infrastructure which includes 678
miles of pipeline, several pump stations, and a water reclamation facility. The water
reclamation facility is being rebuilt to meet environmental regulations, and
construction is occurring in phases to meet the regulatory compliance deadline of
January 1, 2025. Additional construction will continue past this date. The first
phase of construction began in FY 19-20, and additional construction and design
work for future phases is ongoing.
Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary billing rates needed to
generate enough revenue to fund the operations of the utility. The Sewer Utility
charges customers based on average winter water use volume and strength of
produced waste. Independent rate studies are made every several years to gather
public input and to structure rates in accordance with industry standards and
community values. Budgeted FY 24-25 revenues reflect the anticipated impacts of
sewer flows in differing customer classes and a proposed 4% rate increase. The
rate increase is distributed within a seven-tiered block rate structure. The budget
also proposes a rate stabilization fee based on water meter size.
In FY 24-25, the main source of operating revenue for the sewer utility fund will be
charges for sewer services (97%). Other revenue categories include fines, interest
income, survey permits, and miscellaneous revenue.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
110 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SEWER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Sewer Revenue
Sewer Services 39,687,904 45,142,610 50,823,100 57,803,567 70,158,295 76,387,000 77,638,369
Interest Income 2,161,835 1,035,061 438,896 (40,179) 7,652,458 849,448 784,650
Permits, Fines, and Other 298,228 285,917 504,477 840,246 920,179 354,500 1,315,502
Total Sewer Fund 42,147,967 46,463,588 51,766,473 58,603,634 78,730,932 77,590,948 79,738,521
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
SEWER FUND REVENUE
Permits, Fines, and Other
Interest Income
Sewer Services
Act
u
a
l
FY1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY2
2
-
2
3
Bud
g
e
t
FY2
3
-
2
4
Bud
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
10,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
20,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
30,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
40,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
50,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
60,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
70,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
80,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
111 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
The Stormwater Utility operates as an enterprise fund. It exists to convey runoff
and stormwater and to maintain the quality of stormwater discharge within Salt
Lake City boundaries. It is also responsible for mitigating flooding caused by
stormwater runoff. The Stormwater Utility operates stormwater collection
infrastructure system which includes 350 miles of drainage pipe and 27 lift
stations.
Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary fees needed to generate
enough revenue to fund the operations of the utility. The Utility charges
customers for these services based on units calculated as equivalent residential
units (ERU), or ¼ acre determined by area of the customer’s property that is
impervious. The FY 2024-25 budget includes the 10% rate increase or
approximately $0.76 per equivalent residential (ERU) per month.
Revenues received from stormwater fees are the Utility’s main source of operating
revenue (98%). Other revenue categories include interest income and
miscellaneous revenue.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
112 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
STORM WATER FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Storm Water Revenue
Storm Water Services 9,555,773 10,720,158 10,703,273 11,944,768 13,904,739 13,563,906 14,919,297
Interest Income 184,128 129,047 105,061 32,158 799,872 118,986 266,901
Permits, Fines, & Other 50,687 85,397 94,137 163,559 72,997 53,000 53,000
Total Storm Water Fund 9,790,589 10,934,602 10,902,471 12,140,485 14,777,608 13,735,892 15,239,198
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
STORM WATER FUND REVENUE
Permits, Fines, & Other
Interest Income
Storm Water Services
Act
u
a
l
FY1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY2
2
-
2
3
Bud
g
e
t
FY2
3
-
2
4
Bud
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
113 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
STREET LIGHTING FUND
The Street Lighting Utility operates as an enterprise fund. It exists to manage the
City’s street lighting infrastructure facilitating safer vehicle and pedestrian travel at
night. Streetlights are provided at each intersection on long blocks and as needed
on mid-blocks. SLCDPU provides base-level street lighting service on a city-wide
basis and enhanced street lighting services for decorative lighting to two
residential neighborhoods and to one commercial area. Total system conversion to
high-efficiency lighting remains a high priority of this utility.
Revenues are forecast by anticipating the necessary fees needed to generate
enough revenue to fund the utilities operations. Street lighting fees are based on
units calculated as an equivalent residential unit (ERU) which is determined by
front footage of a property. The base lighting rates were established in 2013 at
$3.73 per month per ERU. The average Salt Lake City residence is one ERU, while
commercial, institutional, and industrial properties vary. (ERU). Rates were also
established in 2015 for each enhanced lighting service area. Street Light Fees
proposed in the FY 2024-25 budget include a rate increase of 10% or $0.41 per
equivalent residential (ERU) per month for the base fee.
Revenue received from street lighting fees are the Utility’s main source of
revenue (99%). Other revenue categories include interest income and
miscellaneous revenue.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
114 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
STREET LIGHTING FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Street Lighting Services 4,207,007 4,301,424 4,230,395 4,264,579 4,361,582 4,592,085 5,051,294
Interest Income 88,339 147,727 38,047 30,215 171,632 44,000 42,594
Other 180,558 300 200 204,751 1,111 100 100
Total Street Lighting Fund 4,475,905 4,449,450 4,268,642 4,499,545 4,534,325 4,636,185 5,093,988
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
STREET LIGHTING FUND REVENUE
Other
Interest Income
Street Lighting Services
Act
u
a
l
FY1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY2
2
-
2
3
Bud
g
e
t
FY2
3
-
2
4
Bud
g
e
t
F
Y
2
4
-
2
5
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
115 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
AIRPORT ENTERPRISE FUND
The Salt Lake City Department of Airports manages Salt Lake City International
Airport (SLCIA), Tooele Valley Airport, and South Valley Regional Airport (SRVA).
Salt Lake City International Airport (the Airport) serves a multi-state region and
consists of three air carrier runways and a general aviation runway and is classified
as a large hub airport. The Airport’s extensive route network served over 26.4
million passengers in FY 2022-23. The Airport provides 321 daily departures and
arrivals to 92 non-stop destinations. The New SLC completed phase II of the new
airport with the opening of 22 new gates on Concourse A East in October of 2023.
Phase III will bring an initial 5 gates on Concourse B East in October of 2024 as well
as the opening of the much anticipated Central Tunnel.
Tooele Valley Airport is a general aviation reliever airport to SLCIA. It has one
runway, and support services are on-demand only. South Valley Regional Airport is
also a general aviation reliever airport. It also has one runway and is a base for a
Utah National Guard military helicopter unit.
The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund. It is not supported by property
taxes, general funds of local governments, or special district taxes. Capital funding
requirements for FY 2024-25 are met from non-aeronautical revenues, passenger
facility charges, customer facility charges, general airport revenue bonds (GARBs),
Federal Aviation Administration grants under the Airport Improvement Program,
and State grants.
Major Sources of Airport Fund Revenue
Revenues are forecast by reviewing and analyzing lease agreements, capital
projects, CPI adjustments and passenger levels. The FY 2024-25 budget continues
to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures. Airport non-
aeronautical revenues for FY 2024-25 are projected to increase by 6.4% compared
to the FY 2023-24 budget as more passengers are traveling and spending money at
the Airport.
A major source of revenue (63%) is generated by the airlines. Air carriers pay on a
cost-of- service basis for the services they receive. Rates are set annually based on
direct operating cost, cost of capital, and amortization on asset investment. The
formula used for this system is considered a hybrid structure in the aviation
industry and is based on the ten-year airline use agreement (AUA) that will be
effective on July 1, 2024. In addition, the new AUA will provide more revenues in
the terminal cost center to help pay for construction costs of the new Airport.
Delta, Southwest, and Alaska have signed an extension through June 30, 2044 while
all other carriers have signed agreements through June 30, 2034. The new AUA
provides $1.40 per enplaned passenger revenue sharing, not to exceed 40% of net
remaining revenue, and is credited to the air carriers monthly. Enplaned
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
116 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
passengers are projected to increase by 2.9% to 14.5 million enplanements over
the FY 23-24 budget of 14.1 million enplanements.
The second major source of revenue (31%) is generated from the Airport
concessions. This includes revenue from food and retail concessions as well as car
rental and parking fees. For FY 2024-25, retail concessions, food and beverage,
rental cars, and parking are all projected to increase because of the increase in
passengers as well as an increase in the overall amount spent per passenger
traveling through the Airport. Remaining revenues are generated through cost
recovery of ground transportation costs, lease contracts on buildings, office space,
and hangars. The Airport also receives a portion of the State aviation fuel tax.
In FY 2011-12, the Airport began collecting customer facility charges (CFC) to fund a
new rental car facility. These charges increased from $4 to $5 in FY 12-13 and will
remain at $5 for FY 2024-25. The customer facility charges will meet the financial
requirements to build the rental car service and quick turnaround facilities, plus
the portion of the garage related to rental cars as well as any future rental car
capital improvement projects. The Airport was fully reimbursed in FY 2023-24 for
all the construction costs associated with the facilities mentioned above and will
continue to collect CFC's for future rental car projects.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
117 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
OPERATING REVENUE COMPARISON
Actual FY 18-19 Actual FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Actual FY 21-22 Actual FY 22-23 Budget FY 23-24 Budget FY FY24-25
Operating Revenue:
Concession 92,910,800 75,372,300 63,478,800 113,311,500 119,152,900 134,212,000 149,310,100
Airline 75,636,600 77,312,400 109,691,200 136,820,000 135,439,500 181,942,100 298,434,400
Other Rental 18,992,400 18,738,500 19,224,200 22,379,500 42,579,000 22,869,000 23,696,100
Total Operating Revenue 187,539,800 171,423,200 192,394,200 272,511,000 297,171,400 339,023,100 471,440,600
Period Ending
$
(
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
)
AIRPORT OPERATING REVENUE
Other Rental
Airline
Concession
Actua
l
F
Y
1
6
-
1
7
Actua
l
F
Y
1
7
-
1
8
Actua
l
F
Y
1
8
-
1
9
Actua
l
F
Y
1
9
-
2
0
Actua
l
F
Y
2
0
-
2
1
Budg
e
t
F
Y
2
1
-
2
2
Budg
e
t
F
Y
2
2
-
2
3
0
50,000,000
100,000,000
150,000,000
200,000,000
250,000,000
300,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
118 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
RDA FUND
The primary revenue source for the RDA’s redevelopment efforts is tax increment.
Tax increment is the increase (or “increment”) in the property taxes generated
within a project area over and above the baseline value of property taxes that were
in place at the time a project area was established. Property values increase as an
area is revitalized through investment, thereby creating tax increment. When an
RDA project area is established, the RDA and the participating taxing entities enter
into agreements that determine the amount of tax increment that will continue to
flow to the taxing entities, and the portion that will be reinvested by the RDA into
the project area for a defined period of time. The participating taxing entities
continue to receive the baseline property tax during the life of a project area.
The establishment of a project area and the collection of tax increment funds must
be approved by the RDA Board of Directors and any participating local taxing
entities (e.g., Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City School District, Metro
Water District, Central Utah Water Project, Salt Lake Mosquito Abatement, and Salt
Lake City Library). Not all taxing entities participate in every project area.
Per Utah State Statute, tax increment proceeds must be spent within the project
area where they originated or be found by the RDA Board of Directors to directly
impact that project area.
In addition to tax increment revenues from its various project areas, the RDA also
has the following revenue sources:
1.Interest Income. The RDA receives interest on cash balances.
2.Property Lease Income. The RDA receives lease revenues from various
owned properties, including parking garages in the Central Business
District Project Area.
3.RDA Loan Interest Income. The RDA receives interest generated from loans
it administers. The amount of interest received varies depending on the
number of outstanding loans at any given time.
4.Land Sale Proceeds. The RDA routinely sells property as part of its
redevelopment efforts.
RDA revenues are forecast for each project area by analyzing previous years’ tax
increments received and adjusting conservatively based on current real estate
market conditions. Other income from interest, lease revenues, and RDA loan
interest is also considered.
The FY 2024-25 forecasted RDA Fund revenue budget is $63,484,950.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
119 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE SUMMARY
ActualFY18-19 ActualFY19-20 ActualFY20-21 ActualFY21-22 ActualFY22-23 BudgetFY23-24 Budget FY24-25
Redevelopment Agency Revenue*
Block 70 2,159,178 1,629,755 803,534 2,846,637 1,958,881 1,829,228 2,133,992
Central Business District 25,461,421 32,565,335 31,251,766 28,369,709 28,323,535 24,644,694 29,106,713
West Capitol Hill 1,547,706 40,318 711,967 106,173 525,969 — 384,332
West Temple Gateway 60,753 (1,670,316) 17,246 6,448 10,479 — —
Depot District 3,895,569 5,533,602 5,525,331 5,238,774 5,686,316 5,422,435 6,673,402
Granary District 625,878 781,648 944,077 995,615 1,229,161 1,103,309 1,583,163
Housing Development Trust Fund — 2,590,000 2,583,445 20,629 4,115,745 4,776,563 2,902,000
North Temple 425,243 543,258 640,558 685,381 1,099,822 1,008,715 1,702,574
North Temple Viaduct 1,123,104 1,558,258 2,103,730 2,579,427 2,745,502 2,774,419 3,155,765
9-Line — — — 1,871,603 2,601,746 2,653,781 3,030,715
State Street — — — 3,289,619 4,337,070 4,423,811 5,868,859
Block 67 North — — — — — — 365,771
Sugar House 1,126 1,106 190,038 289 1,457 — —
Program Income 2,441,059 1,690,964 1,440,529 1,951,066 6,250,368 1,411,052 1,559,233
Northwest Quadrant — 198 1,688,689 1,044,303 1,445,384 1,398,548 2,603,998
Stadler Rail — 70,419 102,594 109,392 144,088 141,297 168,744
Westside Community Initiative — — 409,031 512,241 1,674,276 1,401,589 1,835,469
Primary Housing Fund 350,096 315,971 81,125 78,632 398,809 2,379 77,820
Secondary Housing Fund 45,303 43,617 13,227 11,491 68,669 — —
Revolving Loan 761,162 583,574 1,144,760 63,436 358,972 226,750 332,400
Total Redevelopment Agency Revenue 38,897,598 46,277,707 49,651,647 49,780,865 62,976,249 53,218,570 63,484,950
*Interfund transfers are excluded for reporting purposes.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
120 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Period Ending
$
M
i
l
l
i
o
n
s
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REVENUE SUMMARY
Revolving Loan
Secondary Housing Fund
State Street
9-Line
North Temple Viaduct
North Temple
Housing Development Trust Fund
Granary District
Depot District
West Temple Gateway
West Capitol Hill
Central Business District
Block 70
Act
u
a
l
FY
1
8
-
1
9
Act
u
a
l
FY
1
9
-
2
0
Act
u
a
l
FY
2
0
-
2
1
Act
u
a
l
FY
2
1
-
2
2
Act
u
a
l
FY
2
2
-
2
3
Bu
d
g
e
t
FY
2
3
-
2
4
Bu
d
g
e
t
FY
2
4
-
2
5
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,000
50,000,000
55,000,000
60,000,000
65,000,000
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
121 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
New and Outstanding
Legislative Intents
Updated April 10, 2024
AIRPORT
FY 2024 - Air Quality and Transit Investment – The City Council formally
requests that the Airport submit a written plan (and funding proposal if needed) to
the Council regarding plans to encourage and facilitate transit, ride sharing and
other transportation options which do not rely on single-passenger vehicles. The
Council requests that the plan include milestones and metrics to measure progress
on the Airport's investment in mitigating the air quality impact of private vehicle
trips to the airport, the environmental impact of the addition of parking lot
impervious surface to accommodate those vehicle trips, and shared advocacy.
Efforts to support and encourage transit opportunities for the traveling public are
also encouraged by the Council. In making this request the City Council recognizes
that the Airport makes strong environmental investments in its construction and
operations.
FY 2024 Administration Response - The Department of Airports is continuing to
pursue the projects presented in its briefing to Council last October. An informal
transmittal is attached, with updates to specific projects in red font.
See Attachment A.
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
FY 2024 - Department Role Clarity in Ordinance – It is the intent of the Council
to ask the Attorney’s Office to propose updates to the City’s code that define and
discuss the respective roles of City departments. This review should include, but
not be limited to, the Sustainability, Economic Development, and Public Lands
Departments. Per Council discussion, Sustainability is the priority.
FY 2024 Administration Response - The City Attorney’s Office submitted to the
Council proposed ordinance revisions/a transmittal memo on changes to Title 2
related to the Sustainability Department. The Office is currently working on
recommendations for other departments, including the Economic Development
Department and the Department of Public Lands.
FY 2024 - Pay Parity among Attorneys - It is the intent of the Council that the
Administration evaluate pay parity among the City Attorney’s Office, Salt Lake Legal
Defenders, the City prosecutors, and the County prosecutors. Because this may be
a longer-term issue, the Council could ask that the Human Resources Department
conduct a more thorough evaluation on this topic and recommend strategies to
achieve pay parity over the longer term. First priority is that attorneys on both
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
122 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
sides of a courtroom have pay parity; second would be parity among agencies
(County, State, Municipal).
FY 2024 Administration Response – The Salt Lake City Prosecutor’s Office supports
a review process and is willing to participate in any discussions and efforts. This effort
addresses two priorities.
“The first priority is that attorneys on both sides of a courtroom have pay parity”:
Discussion requires definition of terms so that those examining the issue have a base
for understanding, and a review of the various factors that may impact parity such as
– constitutional mandates, statutory obligations; other legal mandates, rules and
requirements; funding sources and budgetary stability, caseloads, case types,
workloads, experience levels, trial duties, administrative duties, respective attorney
and support staffing levels, physical offices, proximity to courthouses, etc.
“Second would be parity among agencies (County, State, Municipal)”: The same
factors above that are relevant side-to-side in a courtroom will be relevant to the
different levels of government and courts: justice courts, district courts, state appeal
courts. For example, recent salary adjustments that began at the state AG level have
created improvements in attracting interest and commitments to work for the Salt
Lake City Prosecutor’s Office.
FY 2023 - Boarded Building Fee – It is the intent of the Council to ask the
Administration for a timeframe when the Council can consider an updated
boarded-building fee, or request that the Attorney’s Office provide a draft directly
to the Council Office.
FY 2024 Administration Response – The updated boarded building fee structure
proposal received a unanimous positive recommendation from the Planning
Commission. The associated changes will be transmitted to the City Council near
the end of this April.
Prior Year’s Response - A transmittal will soon be submitted by the department with
the requested fee and details regarding the program associated with the fee.
FY 2023 - Open and Public Meetings Act (OPMA) – It is the intent of the Council
to ask the Administration to ensure that any City loan or grant processes comply
with the Open and Public Meetings Act (OPMA). The Council could request that the
City Attorney’s Office develop an ordinance more specifically codifying this
understanding.
FY 2024 Administration Response – Response forthcoming.
FY2021 - Decriminalization Review of City Code - It is the intent of the Council
that an in-depth review be conducted of the City Code to consider items that could
be de-criminalized. Council staff could work with Council Members and the City
Attorney’s Office to draft a scope and come back with a report on the timeline.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
123 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2024 Administration Response – The Salt Lake City Prosecutor’s Office supports
a review process for decriminalization efforts and is willing to participate in any
discussions and efforts, noting that there are specific city ordinances that are
frequently used and some of great utility that should be retained. Examples of city
ordinances that should be retained include: city adoption of the Uniform Fire Code
(18.44.010), city adoption of county health ordinances (9.02.010); negligent collision
(12.52.340), negligent collision causing serious bodily injury or death (12.52.355),
improper lookout (12.52.020), failure to supervise a child (11.60.020), battery
(11.08.020), incapable driver (12.24.050), incompetent driver (12.24.030), permitting
incompetent driver (12.24.040), targeted residential picketing (11.12.120),
expectoration and spitting in public places (11.36.150), one arm driving (12.52.060),
opening vehicle doors in traffic (12.52.100), backing of vehicles (12.52.120), allowing
unlicensed persons to drive (12.52.200), all ordinances related to animal cruelty and
animal attacks (Title 8 Animals Chapter 8.04 Animal Control). The charging level of
some offenses might be reviewed (city health violations as MC where county are set as
MB). Some city offenses may be compared to state offenses for redundancy and
necessity (targeted residential picketing as city code 11.12.120 and state code
76-9-109, reckless driving as city code 12.52.360 and state code 41-6a-528 ).
Prior Year’s Response - The initial review of City code, which included a law student
clerk and the Prosecutor’s Office, revealed that more attention and expertise will be
needed to complete this review, including involvement of the Prosecutor’s Office. The
project will be continued in the coming fiscal year.
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT (CAN)
FY 2024 - Options for Citywide Zoning Re-evaluation – It is the intent of the
Council that the Administration prepare a work plan that outlines options for
potential Citywide zoning improvements.
FY 2024 Administration Response - FY24 zoning - The Planning Division is
preparing a proposal to consolidate all of the existing mixed use and commercial
zoning districts (as many as 24 existing zoning districts) into a series of 6 or 7 form
based districts. The form-based districts would establish a scale of development,
ranging from the smaller neighborhood business districts up to the most intense
commercial districts that allow buildings up to 125 feet in height. This would
establish code language between districts and add clarity to applying the zoning code.
This work plan, which would identify the process, resource needs, and tentative
timeline is anticipated to be completed by end of February.
Simultaneously, the Planning Division is working on options for the City Council to
consider related to consolidating the single-family zoning districts. The options include
a list of potential modifications related to minimum lot areas and widths, allowed
housing types, lot coverage, building height, and flag lot provisions. This report is
expected to be completed by the end of January.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
124 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The Planning Division will also start code amendments to update the RMF-35 and
RMF-45 zoning districts to mirror the changes to RMF-30 that were adopted by the city
council in 2023. The RMF-75 zoning district will be included in the proposal to
consolidate the mixed use and commercial districts.
In addition, each of the above will result in simplifying the chapters of the zoning code
that are applicable to all zoning districts, including the land use tables in chapter
21A.33, 21A.36 General Provisions, 21A.37 Design Standards, 21A.44 Off street
parking, 21A.46 Signs, and 21A.48 Landscaping and buffers. This proposed work plan
is anticipated to be completed by the end
of February.
Lastly, the division is working with public utilities to update Plan Salt Lake to address a
state code requirement to integrate water use, consumption, and conservation with
land use planning. State code requires that this be adopted by December 31, 2025.
This proposal will include consistent definitions of future land use designations found
within the community plans and align those designations with zoning districts based
on development potential. The purpose is to improve and simplify forecasting long
term water needs and methods to promote water conservation.
It is anticipated that these actions will extend into the following year and will likely
require some budget allocation to cover the associated costs of completing these
tasks, including noticing and potentially an on-call consultant to help with some
aspects of the proposal, such as public engagement.
FY 2023 - Youth and Family Program Streamlining – It is the intent of the
Council to ask the Administration to evaluate whether to consolidate all City youth
and family programs into the Youth & Family Division. The purpose would be to
increase efficiency and propose options for future budget discussions. Additionally,
the Council would like the Administration to evaluate the City’s role in youth and
family programming in relation to other community organizations to identify
efficiencies and reduce duplication, factoring in overall community demand for
those services. Step 1 of this multi-step process was completed in FY23. Other
steps involve evaluating potential staffing redundancies and reviewing Fire
Department and Police Department programs for potential changes.
FY 2024 Administration Response - CAN has coordinated with Procurement on an
RFP to obtain a consultant to complete a strategic plan for the Youth and Family
Division, utilizing the $100,000 allocated in the FY 2024 budget. The strategic planning
process will include analysis of Youth and Family’s programming in consideration of
the availability of resources and needs within the community. The RFP will be issued
in Q1 of calendar year 2024.
Prior Year’s Response - Evaluate whether to consolidate all City youth and family
programs into the Youth & Family Division, purpose is to increase efficiency and
purpose options for future budget discussions).
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
125 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Some factors to consider:
•YouthCity provides seamless out of school time programs for youth ages 6-18.
Several factors distinguish YC programs from other City, nonprofit and school-
based programs and services.
•YouthCity is offered at a reduced cost to all City residents. This is possible based
on our braided funding stream of general fund dollars, grants, foundation
dollars, and parent fees while building upon existing City infrastructure in
parks and the Sorenson Campus.
•YouthCity is designed to support and augment school day learning using
evidence-based curriculums. All programs undergo a rigorous assessment
4 times per year.
•There are three additional youth programs offered by the Salt Lake City Police
Department and a vocational program offered by the Salt Lake Fire Department.
Each of the programs exist under the direction of staff who are experts in
their field.
What is the City’s role in Youth and Family programs in relation to other community
providers.
•Since inception, YouthCity has actively partnered with other service groups and
out of school time providers. In 2005, YouthCity, Salt Lake City School District, and
the Utah State Department of Workforce Services jointly submitted and was
awarded a Mott Foundation grant to establish the Utah Afterschool Network. UAN
sets the standard for quality, staff training requirements and networking for
providers locally, regionally, and statewide. All programs receiving federal and
state funding participate in a quality out of school time evaluation. Youth and
Family staff have maintained an active leadership role in UAN. The most recent
data indicates that there are 3 out of school time slots for every 5 youth needing
support and or care.
FY 2022 - Trips-to-Transit Expansion Evaluation - It is the intent of the Council
that the Administration provide their strategy for evaluating whether to expand the
Trips-to-Transit program, which began to serve Westside neighborhoods in late
2021, to other areas of the City.
FY 2024 Administration Response - Additional funding in the fiscal year 2024
budget for the UTA On-Demand program has allowed for the restoration of service to
levels that meet the high demand in the Westside service area. Expansion of the
current service area and/or the creation of new service areas in other parts of the City
can be evaluated in partnership with UTA and the on-demand service provider to
determine potential budget implications. Transportation recommends one more year
before developing expansion cost estimates to allow for additional data collection
and for the ridership trends to stabilize in the current service area.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
126 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Prior Year’s Response - This program has far exceeded expectations for usage in its
first year. While we are pleased with the overwhelming success of the program, there
has been some degradation in service as a result of its popularity. We recommend
allowing another 1-3 years to figure out the proper funding/service levels for the
current service area so that we have a better idea of what it would take to expand to
other areas.
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FY 2015 - Maintenance of Business Districts – See description under Public
Services Department.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
FY 2024 - Legal Defenders Association – It is the intent of the Council to request
the Administration.
•shift funding for the Legal Defenders contract to Funding Our Future, under the
policy umbrella of Public Safety, with the rationale that these attorneys are an
integral piece of the criminal justice system and often connect clients to resources
and services to help them recover from an addiction or otherwise help them get
back on their feet
•discuss with Salt Lake County whether it would be more efficient for the County
to manage the full contract, with the City contributing funding towards it.
FY 2024 Administration Response - The funding for Legal Defenders will be
discussed during the Administration’s budget deliberations. Any changes to the
funding source will be addressed at that times.
FY 2023 - Consolidated Fee Schedule Holistic Review – It is the intent of the
Council to complete a holistic evaluation of the City’s Consolidated Fee Schedule
in conjunction with the Finance Department. This evaluation would include equity
considerations and evaluate whether to increase, reduce, or in some cases
eliminate, City fees.
FY 2024 Administration Response - Finance is ready and available to take any
council recommendations for an evaluation of the CFS. Desired changes can
potentially be submitted with the FY25 Budget.
FY 2023 - Grants and Ongoing Programs – It is the intent of the Council to ask
the Administration to evaluate the extent to which new City programs have been
created through grants whose costs have continued beyond the life of the grant.
The Council will use this information to inform a policy or system for evaluating
when and whether it is appropriate for the City to create new programs with
grants.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
127 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2024 Administration Response - Response will be forthcoming.
FY 2015 - Maintenance of Business Districts – See description under Public
Services Department.
MAYOR'S OFFICE
FY 2024 - Apprenticeship Program Incentives – It is the intent of the Council to
ask the Administration to recommend strategies to incentivize an employee who
works through the City Apprenticeship program to remain with the City once they
are certified.
FY 2024 Administration Response - There are several strategies the
Administration, departments and Human Resources have recommended and
utilized to have apprentices stay with the City. These are summarized below:
1.The Mayor proposed, and the Council approved, funding of about $1 million
to advance the apprenticeship program. This funding has been used in two ways.
The funding has been used to pay the salary of thirty-five apprentices this last
year while they are working and learning with us. Secondly, the funding has been
used to "offset" the cost of four positions in Public Services. In addition to paying
the salary of the apprentices while they were learning, funding was transferred
to Public Services to help pay the cost of employing them full-time. On the
strength of that funding, Public Services requested two new positions in the
last budget year.
2.Departments have indicated apprentices are very incentivized by the prospect
of becoming full-time employees and receiving City benefits. Many are working
to further their education and ok forward to tuition benefits. Many have not had
healthcare insurance options which is a significant incentive.
3.The biggest incentive to apprentices is the opportunity to continue to work in a
workgroup they know and in which they feel comfortable. They have relationships
with their mentors and colleagues. They have developed a sense of friendship and
loyalty to them. Additionally, remaining with the City is a known, as opposed to
the uncertainty of a new workplace.
4.Department supervisors and mentors have been very flexible with the
apprentices. As mentioned, many of them are in school. Departments work
with them to adjust schedules and work duties. Apprentices say they appreciate
the work-life balance at the City, as opposed to sixteen-hour days in the
private sector.
FY 2024 - Evaluating Efficiencies of All Diversified Response Teams – It is the
intent of the Council to ask the Administration to evaluate all response teams that
may be considered part of a diversified response to public safety, establish
common metrics, and evaluate whether there are opportunities for efficiencies or
streamlining, including clarity on dispatch and whether/if the public is intended to
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
128 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
contact any teams directly and how resources are deployed. In addition, to clarify
roles of each team and how a call for service is routed from one team to another,
and how calls from the public are routed.
FY 2024 Administration Response - Response Forthcoming.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FY 2021 - Police Department Role – It is the intent of the Council to re-evaluate
the role the City asks the Police Department to play, and the budget to fulfill that
role, and ask the Administration to evaluate moving certain programs out of the
Police Department, like park rangers and social workers, and potentially add a
function to the Human Resources Department to enhance the independence of
the Internal Affairs unit.
a.Social Workers.
FY 2023 - Administration Response – The Community Connections Team is fully
staffed with 3 current vacancies that are in the hiring process. They continue to
provide referrals, resources and co-response throughout the city.
Prior Year’s Response:
Social Workers - This years’ response- Hiring processes are ongoing to fill vacant
positions. The police department is looking into hiring part time social workers to help
facilitate shift coverage on evenings and weekends using attrition savings from the
vacant positions.
b.Internal Affairs Unit.
FY 2024 - Administration Response – The Department hired a civilian director for
the Internal Affairs Unit, which is now part of the Chief’s Office. The director works
closely with the City’s Human Resources Department, the independent Civilian Review
Board, and the public. This director is not a sworn officer, which allows for continuity
and steady leadership since the position is not subject to rotating assignments.
Prior Year’s Response:
Internal Affairs Unit - The Department hired a civilian director for the Internal
Affairs Unit, which is now part of the Chief’s Office. The director works closely with the
City’s Human Resources Department, the independent Civilian Review Board, and the
public. This director is not a sworn officer, which allows for increased objectivity, as
well as for continuity and steady leadership since the position is not subject to
rotating assignments.
c.Police Civilian Response Team.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
129 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2024 - Administration Response – This team is now termed the Police
Community Response Team. This team is comprised of 16 FTE’s and 1 Lieutenant. All
positions are filled and the one-year anniversary of the team is 1/9/2023 and have
responded to approximately 3,000 calls for service to date.
Prior Year’s Response:
Police Civilian Response Team - Twelve PCRT (Police Community Response Team)
positions and 1 supervisor were funded for 6 months in the FY 2023 budget process.
The Police Department steering committee has worked to establish the job
descriptions, recruitment process, and address the training needs for these positions.
A hiring process was completed in December of 2022 and 10 qualified applicants will
fill positions as of 1/8/2023. An additional hiring process will be completed to hire the
remaining 2 positions when the program is established, and time allows. The training
program is anticipated to take 14 weeks to complete. The PCRT program will go into
service when the equipment and training needs have
been satisfied.
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT
FY 2024 - Golf Fee Structure – It is the intent of the Council to ask the
Administration to evaluate developing a program for the Golf Division that could
provide discounted rates to reduce financial barriers for City residents, especially
those with limited financial resources.
FY 2024 Administration Response – As part of the annual budget process, Golf
analyzes its fee structure compared to the projected revenue and operational
expenses. This includes revisiting its current programs and offerings. Golf also reviews
its course inventory and pricing structure through an affordability lens as requested
by the council via the most recent legislative intent. Additionally, Golf will be
researching and interviewing other municipalities that may have programs that
align with what the council has requested. Recommendations for the Council are
anticipated by the end of June 2024.
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
FY 2024 - Building Security - It is the intent of the Council that the Administration
prioritize hiring the new Safety and Security Manager FTE proposed for the Public
Services Department and return to the Council by the end of 2023 with
recommendations for how the building security funds could be used.
FY 2024 Administration Response - At the end of July 2023, this position was filled.
Since then, this position has been working on developing a security program for our
City facilities, including a vulnerability assessment tool that will ultimately provide an
outlook of what is needed to enhance security for our employees at our buildings. As
these security needs are identified, the capital needs will be incorporated in a plan for
funding consideration.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
130 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
A breakdown of the spending of the initial $1.2 million one-time funding has previously
been shared with Council staff.
FY 2015 - Maintenance of Business Districts - It is the intent of the Council to
hold a briefing regarding the costs of enhanced services provided to the Central
Business District, in order to consider: a) revising how City services are provided
and paid for, b) services that may be offered to other established or developing
Business Districts in the City, and c) maintenance of amenity upgrades (such as
lighting and benches). It is also the intent of the Council that this discussion
happen in time to incorporate any changes into the renewal of the Central
Business District agreement and Sugar House Business District. This Intent
includes SAAs. The work should involve the Department of Economic Development
and the Finance Department.
FY 2024 Administration Response - The topic of funding enhanced services in
business districts has been an ongoing discussion for many years. The current funding
for Facilities’ CBD and SBD maintenance is provided by the general fund and covers a
variety of maintenance items at a basic level of service. Funding for the maintenance
of Regent Street improvements is still being subsidized by the RDA and has not been
absorbed by the general fund. Additional amenities that have been added over time
have increased costs, yet operational budget has not reflected an increase other than
inflationary.
Currently, the Public Services Department does not have any mechanisms in place
that allow for funding of any additional services from sources outside the general
fund. The department does respond to demand and new requests as they are added
through increased budget asks, but no additional expansion of programs are in place
at this time.
The Central Business Improvement Assessment Area Management Agreement was
renewed in 2022 with Downtown Alliance and the Department of Economic
Development, and it does not cover CBD maintenance. The SBD has no agreements
in place or an officially defined area.
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
FY 2023 - Water Usage by the City – It is the intent of the Council to ask the
Administration to evaluate water usage by the City and make recommendations
for water conservation. This includes evaluation of water savings opportunities for
CIP projects.
FY 2024 Administration Response – The report on water usage is in final draft
form. Once the report is completed it will be presented to the Administration for
review and to inform the upcoming budget. The approximate date for Council
transmittal is currently unknown. See Attachment B.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
131 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
COUNCIL-LED INTENTS
FY 2023 - Rotating Outside Auditing of Each City Department – It is the intent
of the City Council to re-establish its practice of conducting management and
performance audits of City departments, divisions, and functions on a rotating
basis in the coming years. These audits are in addition to the financial audit that
the City Council oversees annually. The audits are intended to bring consultants in
for an independent look at existing City services to identify opportunities for
improved efficiencies. In addition to a focus on identifying potential efficiencies,
the Council intends to ask the auditors to identify or evaluate professional best
practices, definitions of success for each program, metrics associated with key
functions, and any duplication that exists with other City departments and/or other
levels of government. The Council intends for the audits to inform evaluations of
how City services are meeting residents’ needs while being fiscally responsible with
the taxpayer dollars.
FY 2021 - Police Department Reporting Ordinance – The Council intends to
work with the Attorney’s Office to create an ordinance that establishes reporting
requirements for internal information collected by and related to the Police
Department. The Council adopted a body worn camera ordinance in 2020, but
not broader reporting metrics.
Initially, the Council also intended to create an ordinance that establishes
reporting requirements for internal information collected by and related to
the PD.
The Council’s operational audit of the PD (Matrix Consulting) recommended
expanding public reporting, such as metrics related to:
•internal affairs,
•external complaints,
•workforce demographics and vacancies,
•body worn cameras (new software to facilitate review was funded), and use
of force.
Salt Lake City Financial Policies
132 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Capital
Improvement
Program
This page intentionally left blank
Capital Improvement
Program
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
Salt Lake City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning
program of capital expenditures needed to replace or expand the City’s public
infrastructure. The principal element that guides the City in determining the annual
infrastructure improvements and budget schedule is the current fiscal year capital
budget.
The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development &
Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents
from each district. The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety of criteria and
provides funding recommendations to the Mayor.
The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares
its funding recommendations for the City Council as part of the Annual
Recommended Budget. The City Council reviews the recommendations of the
Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects
before allocating funding and adopting the final CIP budget. The details of the
recommended FY2024-25 CIP Budget are included in this book.
In considering major capital projects, the City looks at the potential operating
impact of each project. New capital improvements often entail ongoing expenses
for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition, the repair and
maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the
new infrastructure. Conversely, a positive contribution, such as a reduction in
ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into the decision-
making process.
Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or
operations expenses, where the departments have included projections of any
increases to future operating costs.
The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress. All projects older
than three years that do not show significant progress are then considered for
recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready projects. The
Administration continuously evaluates the City’s funding of its Capital
Improvement Program. Because the proceeds from debt financing are considered
a source for funding the City’s capital improvement projects, the City analyzes the
effect that issuance of additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current
debt ratio.
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
135 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Resolution No. 29 of 2017 / Salt Lake City Council Capital and
Debt Management Policies
Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding
recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify the expectations of the City’s Capital
Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in
determining how to best address the City’s deferred and long-term maintenance
needs.
Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include:
•A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more
years and cannot have a recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a
fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not include maintenance
expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches.
•A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of $50,000 or
more, with few exceptions.
•Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect
its capital investments and minimize maintenance and replacement costs.
•Priorities are given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety
of the community; are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and
provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in the preservation of
the community’s prior investment.
•The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget
amendment of each year if an existing balance remains on a completed
project.
•Debt Service (excluding G.O. Bonding).
FY 2024-25 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ALLOCATIONS
Salt Lake City’s FY2024-25 adopted CIP budget appropriates $541,401,048 for CIP,
utilizing General Funds, Class “C” Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent Tax
Funds, Redevelopment Agency Funds, Enterprise Funds, and other public and
private funds.
The City’s General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and
Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a payment from the City CIP contribution,
except for the Eccles Theater project. The Library Fund covers the Local Building
Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt
associated with the construction of two fire stations is funded through CIP. Motor
Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds are funded through the City’s Class C Road fund.
Funds to pay debt service, equaling $10,825,204, are included in the adopted
annual budget.
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
136 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City’s
capital improvement projects. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds funded the
reconstruction of Class C roads throughout the City.
A total of $2,750,000 was recommended for Transportation projects. Of this
amount, the budget appropriates $1,500,000 of Funding our Future funds, and
$1,250,000 in ¼ Cent Tax funding. Programs funded include Transit Capital, Safer
Crossings, Neighborhood Byways, and Traffic Signal Replacement.
The recommended budget for Parks, Trails, and Open Space capital improvement
projects includes a total appropriation of $5,875,540 from the General Fund, Parks
Impact Fee funds, and Funding our Future funds. Projects funded include Liberty
Park Greenhouse, Sugar House Park Pavilions, Transitioning to Regionally
Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting Irrigation Systems, and Reducing Water Use,
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study, Courts and Playgrounds, Jordan River
Revitalization, Riverside Park Pathway Loop, Street Futsal Courts, Playground
Shade, Pocket Park Community Space, Calisthenics Fitness Area, and Conversation
Centers.
Public Services capital improvement recommended budget includes a total
appropriation of $17,225,150. Of this amount, the budget appropriates $4,866,350
from the General Fund, $4,250,000 of Class C funding, $1,358,800 of Funding our
Future funds, $6,750,000 in ¼ Cent Tax funding. Programs funded include 400
South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction, Complete Streets Reconstruction and
Overlay, Public Way Concrete, Concrete Replacement, Stabilizing the Fire Training
Tower, Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan, Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements,
and HVAC Control Replacement at the Public Safety Building.
An additional $30,000 in one-time funding for Historic Signs/Markers was also
recommended.
Capital Projects
The CIP pages include details for each recommended project for the FY2024-25
Budget. These pages provide a breakout of the funding recommendations and
future costs associated with each project. The total for capital projects in the
FY2024-25 budget is $25,880,690.
ENTERPRISE FUND PROJECTS
The City’s enterprise functions; Airport, Water, Sewer, Storm Water,
Redevelopment, Refuse Collection and Golf – are by nature, very capital intensive.
The budgets for these activities reflect the need to maintain the integrity and
capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality.
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
137 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Airport Fund – The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City
Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the
operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports (the Airport)
has 664 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing,
developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities
and services, and a convenient travel experience.
The Fiscal Year 2025 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues,
as well as expenditures. The budget no longer contains Covid-19 relief grants that
were used to recover lost revenue as well as subsidize the rates and charges for
commercial and cargo carriers. The Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA)
continues to benefit from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) grants awarded
for FY2025. The BIL grants will continue to provide much needed and critical
funding for airport capital infrastructure projects that are moving from design into
actual construction. The Airport will be bringing on five gates located on Concourse
B as well as the opening of the much anticipated central tunnel in October 2024.
These openings bring additional staffing and maintenance staff requirements while
seeing the complete elimination of the remaining hardstand operations.
The developed FY25 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with
increased passengers and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses.
The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects. These projects include
the Phase III and Phase IV of construction of gates on Concourse B. In addition,
critical projects found in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to
be funded to ensure that all Airport’s owned facilities keep up with critical
infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the
growth we are projecting into future years.
Public Utilities Funds – Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has
four distinct utilities: water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each utility is
operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not used to fund these
services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund
reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally a grant or state/federal government
subsidized loan. The department is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing
Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility
construction, a Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant to
fund a portion of the City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction, and an
American Rescue Plan Act grant to fund the Granary District Floodplain Mitigation
Re-mapping. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that
have been established for each fund. The rates were developed on a cost of service
basis. Our utilities are infrastructure intensive and administration of these assets
requires long term project and financial planning.
The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under
each. In fiscal year 2025, the department has over 60 capital projects between the
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
138 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects. Many of the capital
projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common for projects to
be designed in one year and constructed in subsequent years. The budget includes
projects rated as a high priority in the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP).
The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken
by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems
and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water
treatment plants were built in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Planning is underway for
each of the plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement, with
the City Creek re-construction proceeding towards a 2027 completion date. A
unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local
regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity are water rights
and exchange agreement obligations.
RDA Funds – The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) strengthens
neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic
opportunity, and foster authentic, equitable communities. The RDA utilizes a
powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development
projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public
spaces, and environmental sustainability. The RDA’s primary source of funds for
the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue,
depending on the specific budget account.
The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or
construction of city owned infrastructure projects. As part of the RDA Budget
Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year
funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval
process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation
once the specific projects' costs and details are known. Depending on the project,
the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements
for approval.
The RDA fiscal year 2025 budget process proposes three potential City
infrastructure projects:
•City Creek Daylighting: Allocates an additional $50,000 towards designing the
daylighting of City Creek along the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West,
supplementing the fiscal year 2024's $100,000 appropriation for final
construction drawings. The total project, aimed at improving access to nature,
water quality, and flood mitigation, is estimated to cost between $15 million
and $20 million.
◦
•Japantown Construction Documents: Designates $100,000 to produce detailed
construction documents for the Japantown Design Strategy, essential for
estimating costs and guiding redevelopment. The plans aim to revitalize the
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
139 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
neighborhood while honoring its historical significance and fostering
community engagement and connectivity.
◦
•Japantown Art: Designates a total of $336,577 for enhancing the cultural
landscape through various art installations recommended in the Japantown
Design Strategy that celebrate and preserve Japantown’s heritage. The initiative
aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience
for both residents and visitors.
Sustainability Fund - Sustainability operations enable continuing compliance
with federal, state and local regulations related to landfill gas collection, closing
portions of the landfill, and constructing a new landfill cell within the permitted
footprint included in the master plan. Sustainability proposed no capital projects
for FY 2024-25.
Golf Fund - The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt
Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price
for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of
state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess
revenue generated by user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue
over the past 3 years and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue
projects.
In addition, for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee
increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played to bring more capital into the Golf
CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $7,709,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in
FY25. The Golf Division is in the middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box
hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box areas at each
course and has allocated $60,000 in FY25 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division
is in the middle of a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct
some new carts paths and has allocated $525,000 for FY25. The Golf Division will
undergo a major project installing a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf
course budgeted at $4,400,000. Other significant projects include replacing the
driving range fence at Bonneville and driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf
course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses,
the Golf Division will be using $663,951 in FY25 to purchase additional equipment.
that are moving from design into actual construction. The Airport will be bringing
on 22 gates located on South Concourse East (SCE) in October 2024 which brings
additional staffing and maintenance staff requirements while seeing a significant
reduction in the hardstand operations.
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
140 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Debt Service Projects
Sales Tax Series 2014B Bond $ 744,551 $ 744,551
Sales Tax Series 2016A Bond $ 2,008,941 $ 2,008,941
Sales Tax Series 2019A Bond $ 357,351 $ 357,351
Sales Tax Series 2021 $ 518,668 $ 518,668
Sales Tax Series 2022B Bond $ 2,005,851 $ 2,005,851
Sales Tax Series 2022C Bond $ 3,090,117 $ 3,090,117
ESCO Debt Service to Bond $ 923,600 $ 923,600
Fire Station #3 $ 677,575 $ 677,575
Fire Station #14 $ 498,550 $ 498,550
Debt Service Projects Total $ 10,825,204 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 10,825,204
On
g
o
i
n
g
Ongoing Projects
Crime Lab $ 600,000 $ 600,000
City Leases $ 560,000 $ 560,000
Facilities Maintenance $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Urban Trail Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Planning and Design $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Public Lands Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 683,152 $ 933,152
Community and Neighborhoods - Surplus Land RES $ 700,000 $ 700,000
Ongoing Projects Total $ 2,810,000 $ 683,152 $ — $ — $ 200,000 $ — $ 3,693,152
Ot
h
e
r
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
Other Ongoing
Public Services- ESCO County Steiner $ 155,300 $ 155,300
Public Services - Memorial House $ 20,000 $ 20,000
FY25 Landfill $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Other Ongoing $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,675,300 $ 1,675,300
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
141 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Ne
w
C
I
P
New/Maintenance Projects Total
Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration $ 858,800 $ 858,800
400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Liberty Park Greenhouse Restoration $ 124,000 $ 124,000
Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 $ 3,500,000 $ 3,500,000
Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction Documents
$ 804,500 $ 117,200 $ 921,700
Complete Streets Overlay 2025 $ 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000
Public Way Concrete 2025 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan $ 1,366,350 $ 1,366,350
Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements - Phase I $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000
Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Transit
$ 750,000 $ 750,000
Safer Crossings Citywide $ 300,000 $ 300,000
Sugar House Park – Two Pavilion Replacements (50/50 Cost Share)
$ 480,000 $ 480,000
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting Irrigation Systems, and Reducing Water Use
$ 500,000 $ 500,000
HVAC Control Replacement at PSB $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
142 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Ne
w
C
I
P
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
Neighborhood Byways Program $ 20,000 $ 950,000 $ 970,000
Courts & Playgrounds $ 549,150 $ 54,490 $ 603,640
Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program
$ 730,000 $ 730,000
Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment
$ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000
Riverside Park Pathway Loop $ 530,000 $ 530,000
Street Futsal Courts $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Playground Shade $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way $ 330,000 $ 330,000
Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)
$ 86,200 $ 86,200
5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)
$ 50,000 $ 50,000
Historic Signs/Markers $ 30,000 $ 30,000
Concrete Replacement $ 750,000 $ 750,000
New Projects Total $ 7,330,000 $ 3,154,490 $ 4,250,000 $ 3,146,200 $ 8,000,000 $ — $ 25,880,690
Cost Overrun $ 223,171 $ 223,171
Percent for Art $ 167,378 $ 167,378
Total General Fund/Other Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/Surplus Land Fund CIP Projects
$ 21,355,753 $ 3,837,642 $ 4,250,000 $ 3,146,200 $ 8,200,000 $ 1,675,300 $ 42,464,895
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
143 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
Airport CIP Projects
FedEx Utilities and Roadway $ 3,935,000 $ 3,935,000
Decommission R/W 14-32 & T/W Improvements $ 3,605,000 $ 3,605,000
Taxiway U & V Proper Design $ 4,725,000 $ 4,725,000
Taxiway U & V Proper Construction $ 102,320,400 $ 102,320,400
Taxiway G from E to North of Delta Ramp $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Taxiway H1 & End Runway 16L / 34R Repair $ 4,939,000 $ 4,939,000
Taxiway F Reconstruction (F1 - F2)$ 9,524,000 $ 9,524,000
Runway 16L / 34R & Taxiway Complex Ext Environment Assessment
$ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
SVRA Randon Aviation Taxilane & Infrastructure $ 760,000 $ 760,000
SVRA Pavement Preservation & Apron Expansion $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
Bus Plaza EV Stations $ 1,162,000 $ 1,162,000
Economy Lot Bus Lane Reconstruction $ 3,067,000 $ 3,067,000
Landside Pavement Management FY25 $ 942,000 $ 942,000
QTA Equipment Replacement $ 248,000 $ 248,000
Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations - Phase IV (FY25)$ 1,549,000 $ 1,549,000
GA Hangar Demo - Hughes & Upper Limit $ 718,000 $ 718,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
144 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
GA Hangar Demo - Rows 6, 7, &15 and Pavement Preservation
$ 1,223,000 $ 1,223,000
State of Utah - Sky Harbour Roadway & Site Improvements
$ 3,260,000 $ 3,260,000
Total Airport CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 148,477,400 $ 148,477,400
Go
l
f
Golf CIP Projects
Tee Box Leveling $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Pump Replacement $ 25,000 $ 25,000
Maintenance Equipment $ 456,538 $ 456,538
Range Fence $ 900,000 $ 900,000
Property Fencing Project $ 55,000 $ 55,000
New Construction Projects $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Irrigation Improvements $ 4,400,000 $ 4,400,000
Cart Path Improvements $ 525,000 $ 525,000
Bridges $ 74,000 $ 74,000
On Course Restroom $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Range Hitting Pad Extension $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Golf Carts $ 206,305 $ 206,305
Total Golf CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 8,371,843 $ 8,371,843
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
145 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Pu
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Public Utilities CIP Projects
Water Main Replacements $ 10,093,000 $ 10,093,000
Treatment Plant Improvements $ 62,850,000 $ 62,850,000
Deep Pump Wells $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000
Meter Change-Out Program $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000
Water Service Connections $ 3,950,000 $ 3,950,000
Storage Reservoirs $ 1,075,000 $ 1,075,000
Pumping Plants & Pump Houses $ 320,000 $ 320,000
Culverts, Flumes & Bridges $ 2,550,000 $ 2,550,000
Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)$ 300,000 $ 300,000
Shops, Storehouse, Other Buildings (Water Utility)
$ 80,000 $ 80,000
Treatment Plants $ 214,575,333 $ 214,575,333
Collection Lines $ 24,993,000 $ 24,993,000
Lift Stations $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000
Pu
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Shops, Storehouse, Other Buildings (Sewer Utility)
$ 280,000 $ 280,000
Storm Drain Lines $ 2,155,000 $ 2,155,000
Riparian Corridor Improvements $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Landscaping $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Storm Water Lift Stations $ 5,914,000 $ 5,914,000
Detention Basins $ 3,635,000 $ 3,635,000
Shops, Storehouse, Other Buildings (Storm water Utility)
$ 40,000 $ 40,000
Street Lighting Projects $ 1,240,000 $ 1,240,000
Total Public Utilities CIP Projects $—$—$—$—$—$341,600,333 $ 341,600,333
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
146 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
RD
A
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) CIP Projects
City Creek Daylighting $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Japantown Construction Documents $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Japantown Art $ 336,577 $ 336,577
Total RDA CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 486,577 $ 486,577
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Sustainability CIP Projects
No Projects $ —
Total Sustainability CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Total Enterprise and Other Fund CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 498,936,153 $ 498,936,153
GRAND TOTAL $ 21,355,753 $ 3,837,642 $ 4,250,000 $ 3,146,200 $ 8,200,000 $ 500,611,453 $ 541,401,048
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2025
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City Capital Improvement Program
147 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Department
Budgets
This page intentionally left blank
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Office of the City Council
151 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 3,985,002 4,977,720 5,256,811
Operating and Maintenance 18,635 58,800 58,800
Charges & Services 856,161 921,729 971,729
Capital Expenditures 14,890 2,000 2,000
Total Office of the City Council 4,874,688 5,960,249 6,289,340
DIVISION BUDGETS
Community Affairs 4,725,478 5,610,149 5,939,240 39.00
Legislative Non-Departmental 149,210 350,100 350,100
Total Office of the City Council 4,874,688 5,960,249 6,289,340
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 4,874,688 5,960,249 6,289,340 39.00
Total Office of the City Council 4,874,688 5,960,249 6,289,340
FTE by Fiscal Year 36.00 39.00 39.00
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personnel Services
5,256,811
Operating and Maintenance
58,800
Charges & Services
971,729
Capital Expenditures
2,000
Salt Lake City Office of the City Council
152 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base to Base Changes (296,864)
Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024
budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year
2024. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual
staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes
that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 44,840
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 48,524
This increase reflects the cost of insurance for the City Council as described in the Budget
Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 405,271
This increase reflects the City Council Office portion of the salary proposal described in the
Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 19,750
The Health Saving Account is increased based on the description in the Budget Summary
Policy Issues
Compensation Adjustments 57,570
Compensation increase for various employees
Executive Security 50,000
Security for City Council events and meetings.
Salt Lake City Office of the City Council
153 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
154 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor
155 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor of Salt Lake City
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 4,217,383 5,238,468 5,537,026
O & M 51,515 112,953 138,473
Charges & Services 808,760 1,443,146 1,690,396
Capital Expenditures 42,132 25,500 500
Total Office of the Mayor 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,395
DIVISION BUDGETS
Community Outreach 448,615 1,293,505 1,557,344 9.00
Communication 4,671,175 5,526,562 525,788 3.00
Policy Advisors — — 690,083 3.00
Executive Staff — — 2,641,543 12.00
Government Relations — — 126,600
Equity Administration — — 1,825,037 8.00
Total Office of the Mayor 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,395
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,395 35.00
Total Office of the Mayor 5,119,790 6,820,067 7,366,395
FTE by Fiscal Year 32.00 34.00 35.00
Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor
156 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personnel Services
5,537,026
O & M
138,473
Charges & Services
1,690,396
Capital Expenditures
500
Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor
157 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 26,915
Base-to-Base changes compare personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget
to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024.
Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level,
including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that
happened in the first part of the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes (24,548)
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 15,021
This increase reflects the Office of the Mayor's insurance cost as described in the Budget
Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 111,021
This increase reflects the Mayor's Office portion of the salary proposal described in the
Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 17,250
The Health Saving Account is increased based on the description in the Budget Summary.
Budget Amendment #2: Love Your Block, Know Your Neighbor 62,250
Funding added in budget amendment #2 of FY2024 for the Know Your Neighbor Program
and the Love Your Block Program ongoing expenses.
Policy Issues
Office Reconfiguration Removal of One-time Funding (25,000)
Funding for the Mayor's Office office reconfiguration to accommodate additional employees
is being removed.
SLC Volunteer Corps Expansion (Consultant & Operating Exp) (Ongoing) 63,000
Funding of $30,000 is being included for a consulting fee to develop a volunteer service plan
and an additional $33,000 is being included for ongoing operational costs of the program.
Love Your Block Program - Tool & Expansion (One-time) 69,000
The recommended budget includes $65,000 for a truck and equipment for a trailer. An
additional $4,000 is also being included for ongoing operational costs and maintenance.
Senior Advisor to the Mayor (Grade 39) (12 Months) 216,420
The budget includes funding for a Senior Advisor to the Mayor position. This position will
oversee the execution of priority projects and public-private partnerships currently identified
and prioritized by the Mayor, including but not limited to the downtown sports &
entertainment district, Main Street pedestrian improvements, the Green Loop, and Grand
Boulevards.
Community Cultural Events Supplies (Ongoing) 15,000
The budget includes funding for supplies for the community cultural events.
Salt Lake City Office of the Mayor
158 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Airports
159 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Department of Airports
AIRPORT OVERVIEW
The Salt Lake City Department of Airports manages Salt Lake City International
Airport (the Airport), Tooele Valley Airport, and South Valley Regional Airport. The
Airport serves a multi-state region and consists of three air carrier runways and a
general aviation runway and is classified as a large hub airport. The Airport's
extensive route network served over 26.4 million passengers in FY2023. The
Airport provides 321 daily departures and arrivals to 92 non-stop destinations.
Enplaned passengers are estimated to increase by approximately 2.9% from the
FY2024 budget of 14.1 million enplanements to 14.5 million enplanements for
FY2025. The NEW SLC completed phase II of the new airport with the opening of 22
new gates on Concourse A east in October of 2023. Phase III will bring an initial 5
gates on Concourse B east in October of 2024 as well as the opening of the much
anticipated Central Tunnel.
Tooele Valley Airport is a general aviation reliever airport to the Airport. It has one
runway and support services are on-demand only. South Valley Regional Airport is
also a general aviation reliever airport. It also has one runway and is a base for a
Utah National Guard military helicopter unit.
The Department of Airports is an Enterprise Fund. It is not supported by property
taxes, general funds of local governments or special district taxes. Capital funding
requirements for FY2025 are met from non-aeronautical revenues, passenger
facility charges, customer facility charges, general airport revenue bonds (GARBs),
Federal Aviation Administration grants under the Airport Improvement Program,
and State grants.
MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT
The mission of the Salt Lake City Department of Airports is to develop and
manage a system of airports, owned by Salt Lake City, which provides quality
transportation facilities and services to optimize convenience, safety, and
efficiency for aviation customers. The vision is to achieve excellence and
unprecedented customer service in making Salt Lake City among the most
convenient and efficient air transportation centers in the world.
Salt Lake City Department of Airports
160 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Pass the Transportation Security Administration's
annual security inspection, TSR 1542 Security Regulations
Passed Passed Passed Pass Pass
Pass the annual certification by the FAA per Regulation 139 Passed Passed Passed Pass Pass
Maintain airfield runway operating capacity rate of not less than 95%>95%>95%>95%>95%>95%
The Airport Enterprise Fund
will maintain adequate cash
reserves of 25% of their operating expenditures
>25%>25%>25%>25%>25%
Target cost per enplaned passenger of not greater than $20.00 11.25*8.11*8.28 9.94 17.88
*Reflects impacts of COVID-19
Salt Lake City Department of Airports
161 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
William W. Wyatt, Department Director
I
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 58,756,634 71,058,829 76,520,700
Operating and Maintenance 20,108,959 18,938,100 25,014,000
Charges & Services 93,691,677 118,528,368 137,309,375
Capital Expenditures (64) 188,100,800 167,478,025
Interest & Bond Expenditures 139,648,339 123,662,900 169,923,000
Depreciation & Amortization 148,449,312 — —
Transfers Out — 150,000 150,000
Total Airport 460,654,857 520,438,997 576,395,100
DIVISION BUDGETS
Office of the Director 1,456,325 1,890,775 1,799,252 3.00
Finance & Accounting 298,933,161 322,696,040 349,434,063 16.50
Operations 49,384,056 55,303,646 58,251,711 209.80
Commercial Services 5,041,422 6,767,575 7,274,322 17.00
Maintenance 77,415,639 98,040,783 113,942,908 325.50
Planning & Environmental 1,977,943 3,039,050 3,452,056 16.00
Design & Construction Management 1,967,836 3,799,151 4,441,529 29.50
Information Technology 12,579,207 15,316,701 21,345,708 43.00
Communications & Marketing 1,246,902 1,879,976 1,991,352 4.00
Airport Police 10,652,366 11,705,300 14,462,200
Total Airport 460,654,857 520,438,997 576,395,100
FUNDING SOURCES
Airport Fund 5,054,978 6,044,149 576,395,100 664.30
Total Airport 5,054,978 508,778,032 576,395,100
FTE by Fiscal Year 619.30 639.30 664.30
Salt Lake City Department of Airports
162 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personnel Services
76,520,700
Operating and Maintenance
25,014,000
Charges & Services
137,309,375
Capital Expenditures
167,478,025
Interest & Bond Expenditures
169,923,000
Salt Lake City Department of Airports
163 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
164 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney
165 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Office of the
Salt Lake City Attorney
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
Our goal is to be valued and trusted partners, recognized and relied upon for our
expertise, creativity, and commitment to advancing the City’s goals.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
The City Attorney’s Office’s mission is to provide high-quality, timely legal
advice to the City and be relied upon as a trusted, productive, and positive City
team member.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Department of the Salt Lake City Attorney includes four divisions: the Civil
Attorney's Division, the Office of the City Recorder, the Legislative Affairs Division,
and the Risk Division. In addition, the City Attorney's Office manages the
contractual relationship between the County District Attorney and the City, in
which the County District Attorney is designated as the City Prosecutor.
The Department of the City Attorney strives to supervise and coordinate efforts of
its Divisions to support departments of the City (both the Administrative and
Legislative branches) through legal advice, process, and policy development.
Administratively, the Office closely coordinates with Risk Management on litigation
matters and claims submitted against the City, works with the Prosecutor’s Office
on budgetary and administrative matters, supports the Recorder’s Office to serve
the City’s goals of transparency and compliance with the law. The recent addition
of the Legislative Affairs division aligns the responsibility for monitoring state and
federal legislation and engaging in advocacy, collaboration, and tracking of
legislative matters for the City.
Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney
166 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Maintain an hourly rate for services provided by the City Attorney's Office (CAO) to less than 50% of the average rates the City pays for outside counsel
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Maintain the number of open litigation holds to less than a 10% increase from year to year
16% increase <10%<10%
Maintain the number of open litigation cases to less than a 10% increase from year to year
51% increase <10%<10%
Maintain a disposition rate of 85% or higher.85%97%>85%>85%
Have City Council Minutes approved and available to the public within 30 days at least 95% of the time.
80%95%95%100%100%
Number of GRAMA requests received by the City annually 15,976 16,435 15,620 15,000 15,000
Annual percentage increase in GRAMA requests >1%>1%>1%>1%
Process, activate, and digitize all contracts entered into on behalf of Salt Lake City within three working days 100% of the time
95%98%98%100%100%
Number of workers’ compensation claims filed, based on date of injury TBD 570 504 504 504
Number of property damage claims filed, based on date of loss. TBD 209 307 307 307
Number of bodily injury, claims filed, based on date of loss TBD 34 58 95 95
Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney
167 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 8,603,303 10,609,631 13,713,604
Operating and Maintenance 57,605 98,841 1,506,468
Charges & Services 7,728,732 7,922,884 6,617,282
Capital Expenditures 25,847 85,844 30,844
Total Attorney's Office 16,415,487 18,717,201 21,868,197
DIVISION BUDGETS
City Attorney's Office (Civil Division) 5,349,678 7,588,241 8,165,382 23.00
City Recorder 1,119,291 1,354,287 1,664,797 12.00
Risk Management 6,409,166 4,856,345 6,077,613 3.80
Prosecutor's Office 3,537,352 4,918,328 5,508,661 36.50
Legislative Review — — 451,744 4.00
Total Attorney's Office 16,415,487 18,717,201 21,868,197
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 8,683,237 10,490,844 12,881,528 66.50
Governmental Immunity Fund 4,198,907 3,370,012 3,894,763 9.00
Risk Fund 3,533,343 4,856,345 5,091,906 3.80
Total Attorney's Office 16,415,487 18,717,201 21,868,197
FTE by Fiscal Year 57.5 73.30 79.30
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
13,713,603.5
O & M
1,506,467.72
Charges and Services
6,617,281.56
Capital Expenditures
30,844
Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney
168 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE CITY ATTORNEY
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted General Fund budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 82,365
Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 151,306
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 120,416
This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Attorneys’ Office as described in the
Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 1,333,860
This increase reflects the Attorney's Office portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget
Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
CCAC Salary Adjustments 13,977
The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in
accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC).
Health Savings Account 39,500
The Health Savings account is increasing as described in the Budget Summary.
Policy Issues
Office Reconfiguration One-time Cost Reduction (55,000)
Represented as a reduction of one-time funding for the break room design on the 5th floor.
Operating Costs - Legislative Affairs (Ongoing) 80,000
The Division was created during a budget amendment, and it was an oversight to not include
operating costs. The costs will account for professional development and access to the Lobby Lounge.
Personnel Adjustments-Legislative Affairs (Adjust a position to grade E35) (Ongoing) 85,287
Adjustment of a position to provide Deputy Director support to the Legislative Affairs Director
position. This also includes a re-class to the Legislative Affairs Director.
Professional Development (One-time) 49,000
Conference attendance, annual certification requirements and a growing team aligns with the design
for collaborative partner development through professional opportunities.
Personnel Adjustments - Recorder's (Deputy Recorders from E26 to E31) (Ongoing) 89,710
Deputy Recorders have evolved in their role to include technology development and data
management in addition to paper records and operations. This adjustment is representative of the
required skill set and citywide support offered by the Recorder’s office. This also includes a re-class
for the Director of the Recorders Office.
Special Projects Analyst - Board Member Compensation (E26) (10 Months) (Ongoing) 89,640
In fulfillment of the Executive Order regarding Board & Commission Member compensation, the
Recorder’s office is handling the compensation in coordination with HR and Finance.
Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney
169 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Prosecutors Office - City Prosecutor Assistant (10 Months) (Ongoing) 60,623
Due to the judge model adjustment, two prosecutor assistants are necessary to support a single
judge. The request supports the new model of support, improve case processing and lessen the
probability of employee burnout.
Salt Lake City Office of the City Attorney
170 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods
171 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Department of Community
and Neighborhoods
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
1.CAN Administration
2.Building Services
3.Housing Stability
4.Planning
5.Transportation
6.Youth and Family
MISSION STATEMENT
The Department of Community and Neighborhoods creates Sustainable, Equitable,
Growing, and Opportunity-rich (“SEGO”) communities and neighborhoods through
emphases on:
1. Upward Mobility
2. Housing Affordability
3. Community Investment
4. Transportation Options
5. Neighborhood Amenities
6. Safe and Healthy Built Environments.
Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Building Services Number of building safety and
code compliance inspections completed 46,686 46,307 57,907 46,000 46,000
Transportation Number of annual service requests (stop signs, speeding, signal timing, parking, etc.)958 1,145 1,427 1,400 1,400
Planning Number of planning applications received annually 1,191 1,202 1,045 875 875
Housing Stability Residents assisted through programs supported by Federal funds 10,723 11,950 15,149 16,350 16,350
Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods
172 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas, Department Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 20,681,585 23,272,321 26,249,025
O & M 300,965 298,475 296,077
Charges & Services 9,937,576 9,572,365 8,164,036
Capital Expenditures 105,946 — —
Total Community & Neighborhoods 40,484,819 33,143,161 34,709,138
DIVISION BUDGETS
Building Services 7,000,103 7,685,416 8,994,317 65.00
Office of the Director 1,995,495 3,159,283 2,374,003 13.00
Housing Stability 10,717,062 9,106,818 9,762,459 22.00
Planning 4,941,873 5,426,157 5,888,337 42.00
Youth and Family Development 2,739,865 3,349,088 2,908,111 21.00
Transportation 13,090,421 4,416,399 4,781,912 30.00
Total Community & Neighborhoods 40,484,819 33,143,161 34,709,138
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 30,935,445 33,143,161 34,709,138 193.00
Transportation Fund 9,549,374 —
Total Community & Neighborhoods 40,484,819 33,143,161 34,709,138
FTE by Fiscal Year 190.00 195.00 193.00
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal
Services
26,249,025
O & M
296,077
Charges &
Services
8,164,036
Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods
173 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 1,024,588
Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 165,861
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 298,742
This increase reflects a change in insurance cost for the Department of Community and
Neighborhoods as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 1,590,278
This increase reflects the Department of Community and Neighborhoods' portion of the salary
proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
CCAC Salary Adjustments 213,920
The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in
accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC).
Health Savings Account 101,000
The Health Saving Account has increased as described in the Budget and Summary
Policy Issues
Youth & Family 4.0 FTE - Typically Grant Funded (447,136)
The FY 2024 included one time costs for 4 Youth and Family FTE's that are typically funded by a grant.
However, due to the timing and uncertainty of receiving the grant, these positions were temporarily
appropriated in the general fund.
Train Crossing Safety Signage (FOF) (150,000)
The FY 2024 budget included one time costs for a pilot program to create a system that alerts travelers
with dynamic signage at strategic railroad crossings that will allow them to take a different route.
Budget Amendment : PD Substation TI Moved to PS (513,208)
The FY 2024 budget included one time costs for the tenant improvement (TI) of the PD Substations.
The budget was transferred to Public Services as the administering entity of TI in a Budget
Amendment.
Planning Study (100,000)
The FY 2024 budget included one time costs to hire a consultant to assist with a study of
neighborhoods meeting basic core needs within walking distance.
Youth & Family Strategic Plan (100,000)
The FY 2024 budget included one time costs to draft a strategic plan to ensure the city is effectively
serving our youth and not duplicating community programs.
Homeless - Ambassador Expansion Area Increase 197,399
In order to continue to fund the ambassador coverage of Rio Grande, North Temple, Ballpark and
Central City areas, The Downtown Alliance has requested an increase in budget due to inflationary
costs in order to maintain the same level of staffing and coverage.
Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods
174 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Homeless - Black Water Tank Disposal Voucher Program (10,000)
Th FY 2024 budget included one time costs for black water dumping of occupied RV's where needed to
protect public and environmental health.
Homeless - RV Repairs (100,000)
The FY 2024 budget included one time costs for simple repairs of RV occupied vehicles and for the
decommission of RV's that were closed to occupancy. Any future funding for this program will be
requested through Public Services.
Homeless - Winter Shelter Overflow (60,000)
In order to maintain a flat budget, this budget is being reduced to fund the Ambassador program
increase. The decrease to this program will have little to no effect on current levels of service because
other State homeless funding exists to help fill this gap.
Homeless - United Site Portable Toilet Rental (27,399)
In order to maintain a flat budget, this budget is being reduced to fund the Ambassador program
increase. The decrease to this program will have little to no effect on current levels of service because
other State homeless funding exists to help fill this gap.
Communications and Engagement Manager (Grade 34) (10 Months) 139,715
CAN has many public facing divisions. This position will help craft effective communication strategies,
ensuring consistent messaging across divisions/department, including public relations, internal
communications and monitoring media coverage. (1 FTE)
Building Inspector III (Grade 27) (10 Months) 104,580
The budget includes a new FTE in order to comply with ordinance (5.14.085) requiring apartments
being inspected for housing violations every 4 years. (1 FTE)
Fleet Fuel Increases (Ongoing) 11,557
The FY 2024 budget includes inflationary increases based on fuel usage and prices.
Housekeeping - Consolidate City Lease Budgets (CIP) (Ongoing) (560,000)
There are currently three city properties that are leased (CCC, PD Substations, and the Crime Lab).
These funds are being transferred to consolidate all city leases into a single budget for tracking and
reporting purposes.
Salt Lake City Department of Community and Neighborhoods
175 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
176 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development
177 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Department of Economic
Development
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
Salt Lake City, the Capital City of Utah, seeks to serve as a regional leader for
economic opportunities, commerce, culture and recreation, research and
innovation, sustainability, and inclusiveness.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
The Department of Economic Development’s (Department) mission is to build Salt
Lake City as a vibrant, beautiful, prosperous, diverse, and authentic place. We do
this as a professional organization through partnerships, business development,
arts and culture, place-making, and revitalization, while promoting the City’s
many attributes.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development is working hard to make
Salt Lake City a better place to build a business and also a life. Along with
overseeing Economic Development initiatives, the Department focuses on business
development and growing the arts through the Salt Lake City Arts Council (Arts
Council). These teams have aligned resources and streamlined processes to grow
and nurture a city that fosters gainful job creation, thriving business districts and
neighborhoods, and a diverse arts and culture scene.
The Department of Economic Development has established a building services
liaison for businesses/developers to provide guidance on design review and
submittal processes throughout the City. The Department has grown partnerships
with key players in the Utah Economic Development ecosystem. Notably, the
Economic Development Corporation of Utah (EDC Utah), Governor's Office of
Economic Opportunity, Visit Salt Lake, and Salt Lake County. Also, the Department
has developed local partnerships with entities that include, Salt Lake City Arts
Council Foundation, the Downtown Alliance, Suazo Business Center, BioHive,
BioUtah, the World Trade Center Utah, the Salt Lake Chamber and the Diverse and
Ethnic Chambers of Commerce in the Salt Lake City Area.
Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development
178 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
*Business Development Division Performance Measurements
Business Development Performance Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Business Recruitment and Retention Site Visits 64 165 187 ≥225 235
New Leads Generated 131 194 200 ≥220 230
New Opportunities Created from Leads 138 242 130 ≥130 137
WINs (Written Impact Narrative) co-
published investment successes
with companies
11 16 12 ≥12 13
*Note: It is important to recognize that during the COVID-19 Pandemic, it was difficult to perform some of the activities that are part of
the work of the Economic Development Team which include, but are not limited to, visits with business owners and partners. However
during the pandemic, the Department created programs to support businesses; and although, these programs brought support to
businesses, it also resulted in the metrics being impacted during this unprecedented time.
Arts Council (Division) Mission Statement
The mission of the Salt Lake City Arts Council is to promote, present, and support artists and arts organizations in
order to facilitate the development of the arts and expand awareness, access, and engagement.
Arts Council Performance Measure 2021 Actuals 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Attendees 36,070 68,594 86,277 45,000 40,000
Artists Served 1,532 3,265 2,024 2,000 1,500
Total Grants Awarded 151 141 149 115 85
Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development
179 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Department Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 2,573,663 3,035,078 3,574,170
O & M 14,860 43,800 43,800
Charges & Services 422,948 646,213 591,213
Capital Expenditures 208,578 700,000 600,000
Total Economic Development 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183
DIVISION BUDGETS
Economic Development 1,924,246 3,004,282 1,849,202 14.50
Business Development — — 1,257,139
Arts Council 1,045,803 1,170,809 1,402,842 9.00
Cultural Core 250,000 250,000 300,000
Total Economic Development 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183 23.50
Total Economic Development 3,220,049 4,425,091 4,809,183
FTE by Fiscal Year 22.00 22.00 23.50
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
3,574,170.18
O & M
43,799.88
Charges and Services
591,212.88
Capital Expenditures
600,000
Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development
180 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 55,113
Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY 2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Insurance Rate Changes 81,596
This increase reflects a change in the insurance cost for the Department of Economic Development
as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 292,414
This increase reflects the Department of Economic Development's portion of the salary proposal
described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Pension Changes 41,718
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System.
CCAC Salary Adjustments 3,751
The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in
accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC).
Health Savings Account 17,500
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Policy Issues
DED Strategic Plan (One-time) (80,000)
This one-time funding in FY2023/2024 was to engage a consultant to build on the work done in the
previous strategic plan and includes changes within the economic landscape in Salt Lake City since
2020 and was one-time funding. The Department has contracted with a consultant and the process is
under way. No additional funding is needed.
Partnerships with Non-profits Servicing Local Small Business (30,000)
This one-time funding in FY2023/2024 was included by City Council in FY2024 to extend our
traditional financial support to community based organizations to more, smaller organizations who
serve small businesses.
Granary District Special Assessment Area Study (60,000)
This one-time funding was for the City to contract a consultant and pay the Bond Counsel for the
City’s due diligence to create a legal assessment area in the Granary District.
Main Street Promenade Economic Analysis (One-time) 115,000
This one-time funding request is a follow up analysis to the Main Street Promenade conceptual
design study. This study will report on key economic indicators such as sales tax, property tax, etc.
that will project the return on investment. It will also identify sources of funding to construct the
Promenade.
Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development
181 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Construction Mitigation (Continuation of One-time Funding) 100,000
The budget includes additional construction mitigation funding to continue the service provided by
the City starting in FY2022. The funding will be used to provide grants to businesses affected by
construction projects that have caused loss of revenue to promote their businesses to their
customers.
Non-Departmental Sister Cities (12 Months. PT) 47,000
DED has demonstrated the value and potential for the Sister Cities Program enhancements, but the
Department is not able to sustain it with existing resources. In addition, the Olympic bid has put
more pressure on diplomatic requests and demands within the City. (.5 FTE).
Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development
182 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Finance
183 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Finance Department
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
As stewards of public resources, we continually strive to excel in providing
accurate, clear, relevant, complete, and timely information through the
development and implementation of innovative programs and processes.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
In the spirit of service and dedication, the Finance Department develops
efficient and sustainable solutions to manage and safeguard Salt Lake City’s
financial resources.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Finance Department consists of six divisions: the Treasurer’s Office, Purchasing
and Contracts, Accounting and Financial Reporting, Administrative Audit, Revenue
Operations, and Policy and Budget. Grants Acquisition and Management, Financial
Analytics, and Capital Asset Planning are also housed within the department. Each
division is vital to Salt Lake City’s financial health and functionality.
•Accounting and Financial Reporting is responsible overall for payments and
financial reporting required by state law.
•Policy and Budget primarily focuses on ushering anything budget-related
within the City’s financial functions through all the required steps in the
annual budget and budget amendment process.
•Purchasing and Contracts Management staff are responsible for researching,
developing, procuring, and contracting for operational supplies and services
required for each City department to function within its defined scope.
•Administrative Audit functions entail auditing internal processes, policies,
procedures and investigating allegations of fraud, waste and abuse as well as
maintaining the fraud, waste and abuse hotline.
•Revenue Operations functions entail helping all departments collect on all
past-due revenues and ensure that revenues are coming into the City in a
timely manner.
•The Treasurer’s Office has the primary responsibility of ensuring the City’s
fiduciary responsibilities relating to the collection, management, and
disbursement of public funds are handled responsibly.
Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Maintain a General Fund Balance of
at least 15% of operating budget 21%24%38%>15%>15%
Maintain the City’s prestigious AAA
rating AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA
Salt Lake City Department of Finance
184 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 9,046,505 10,643,897 11,361,105
O & M 78,135 780,174 291,841
Charges & Services 5,763,584 5,573,153 1,355,684
Capital Expenditures — 1,145,000 —
Total Finance 14,888,224 18,142,224 13,008,630
DIVISION BUDGETS
Office of the Director — — 602,285 10.00
Accounting & Financial Reporting 3,206,820 2,229,781 3,345,798 14.00
Policy & Budget 855,138 3,140,673 668,218 8.00
Purchasing & Contracts 1,224,556 1,558,727 1,700,393 13.00
Revenue & Collections 1,970,345 2,073,612 3,556,024 23.00
Internal Audit 1,035,779 1,248,797 877,849 4.00
Treasurer's Office 1,781,394 1,961,447 1,994,504 9.00
Grants Administration — — 263,558 4.00
ERP Maintenance 4,814,192 5,929,187 —
Total Finance 14,888,224 18,142,224 13,008,630
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 10,038,470 12,168,296 12,963,889 84.70
Information Management Serv. Fund 4,814,192 5,929,187 —
Risk Fund 35,562 44,741 44,741
Total Finance 14,888,224 18,142,224 13,008,630
FTE by Fiscal Year 76.70 81.70 84.70
Salt Lake City Department of Finance
185 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
11,361,105
O & M
291,841
Charges and Services
1,355,684
Salt Lake City Department of Finance
186 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 154,466
Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 18,428
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 66,413
This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Finance Department as described in the
Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 343,378
This increase reflects the Finance Department's portion of the salary proposal described in the
Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 37,600
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Policy Issues
Resource X Program Based Budgeting (Ongoing) 60,000
Funding to continue the work effort around Program Based Budgeting with ResourceX. Now in its
third year, all general fund departments are participating and staff are looking to establish a long-
term contract.
Business Systems Analyst (Grade 28) (10 Months) 126,437
Two Business Systems Analyst positions are being recommended to primarily focus on tasks
surrounding the Workday Program. With Salt Lake City's new financial system has come some great
and new modules that weren't included in the legacy system. These new modules have created
demand to maintain, test, and improve the operations of the new financial system. (2 FTE)
Grant Analyst - PT to FT (Ongoing) 55,284
The existing Grant Analyst position has been difficult to fill as a part-time position due to the
expertise and skill set needed. As a full-time position, it is anticipated it will be easier to find stronger
candidates. (+ .5 FTE)
Salt Lake City Department of Finance
187 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
188 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Fire Department
189 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Fire Department
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
The Salt Lake City Fire Department provides exceptional emergency services with
progression and efficiency.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
Prepare Effectively. Respond Professionally. Impact Positively.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Salt Lake City Fire Department specializes in urban structural firefighting,
emergency medical services, and emergency management. The Department
has 406 full-time equivalent positions, divided into two battalions, serving in 14
stations covering 97 square miles.
All Firefighters hold a certification as Emergency Medical Technicians (Basic Life
Support). The Department also has firefighters trained to specialty levels of
Engineer, Hazardous Materials (Hazmat), Airport Rescue Firefighter (ARFF),
Swift Water Rescue (SWR) and, Heavy Rescue (HRT), improving customer
service delivery.
The Fire Administration Division comprises the Logistics, Community Relations, Fire
Prevention, Medical Services, and Technology Division. Logistics provides support
for all fire apparatus the department uses and they maintain the fire facilities' and
fire equipment. Fire Prevention reviews all buildings and proposed new
construction. Medical Services overseas the Community Health Access Team
(CHAT), Medical Response Team (MRT), CPR training, and Continuing Medical
Education (CME) for the department. Technology oversees all radio upkeep, station
alerting, and computer programs/software related to the department.
Fire Operations consist of Station Operations, Airport Operations, and the Training
Division. Firefighters are trained and ready to respond, meeting our core mission
of service to the public. The department maintains four firefighters per emergency
unit to operate at the most effective and efficient level possible and to protect
firefighters from the dangers associated with fighting fires. Each fire unit assigned
to the Operations Division is required to perform monthly business inspections.
Firefighters assigned to the Airport are the first responders to the airfield and
trained to the specialty level of Airport Rescue Firefighter (ARFF).
Salt Lake City Fire Department
190 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Karl Lieb, Fire Chief
Department Performance Measurements
Performance Measures 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Improved turnout times Ahead of Target Ahead of Target Ahead of Target Ahead of Target Ahead of Target
Reduce Operational Injuries Ahead of Target Ahead of Target Ahead of Target Ahead of Target Ahead of Target
Fire Prevention will complete 4,300
inspections per year 3,539 3,635 3,392 >4,300 >4,300
Salt Lake City Fire Department
191 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Karl Lieb, Fire Chief
FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 44,586,146 48,966,928 51,302,040
O & M 1,225,905 1,306,645 1,313,045
Charges & Services 1,755,691 1,806,784 1,798,923
Capital Expenditures 390,633 184,000 135,000
Total Fire 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,008
DIVISION BUDGETS
Fire Administrative Services 8,074,717 9,028,904 4,022,352 83.00
Fire Office of the Chief 3,979,980 3,821,053 4,079,324 9.00
Fire Operations 35,903,678 34,365,740 39,727,516 314.00
Fire Community Risk Reduction — 5,048,660 2,345,227
Fire Logistics — — 2,040,174
Fire Medical Division — — 2,334,415
Total Fire 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,008
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,008 406.00
Total Fire 47,958,375 52,264,357 54,549,008
FTE by Fiscal Year 392.00 402.00 406.00
Salt Lake City Fire Department
192 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services: 51,302,040
O & M
1,313,045
Charges & Services
1,798,923
Salt Lake City Fire Department
193 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Karl Lieb, Fire Chief
Changes discussed below represent changes to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base to Base Changes 163,859
Base to base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget
to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024.
Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level,
including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that
happened in the first part of the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes (405,181)
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 473,079
This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Fire Department as described in the
Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 1,729,802
This increase reflects the Fire Department's portion of the salary proposal described in the
Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 210,750
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Policy Issues
One-time Reductions (118,500)
The Fire Department was granted one-time money in FY2023-2024 to fund the acquisition of a
new compressor system at Station 1, as well as monies to hydrostatically test SCBA oxygen
bottles. This removes the one-time funding.
Transfer to Non-Departmental for Fire Hydrant (Ongoing) (241,250)
Public Utilities charges the General Fund the cost of maintaining all city fire hydrants including
associated water usage. This transfers the responsibility of this expenditure to the non-
departmental fund.
Medical Response Paramedics (MRPs) - (Ongoing) 163,727
This funds two new Medical Response Paramedics (MRPs) FTEs within the Fire Department's
Mobile Response Team (MRT) allowing the teams to respond to higher acuity level calls for
service. (2 FTE, FOF).
Contracts/Inflationary Increases (Ongoing) 243,365
This funds the high-inflationary environment of doing business. The increases will go towards
software/maintenance/supply contracts, medical equipment, education/training, and other
miscellaneous contracts.
Narcotics Tracking System (One-time) 65,000
This one-time funding will allow the department to procure a new narcotics tracking inventory
system ensuring compliance to federal rules/laws regarding pharmaceuticals and narcotics.
Salt Lake City Fire Department
194 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources
195 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Human Resources
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
To help Salt Lake City thrive through sustainable and effective human resource
business practices, policies, and investment in the City’s greatest asset, its
employees, to work collaboratively within departments and with city leaders.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
We deliver best-in-class service and programs, add strategic value to Salt Lake City
Corporation, and promote an engaged and dedicated workforce committed to the
highest levels of public service. We are focused on attracting the best talent,
promoting opportunities for growth and development, and providing fair and
competitive compensation packages for all employees.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Department of Human Resources is a team of 36 full-time employees and
provides services for all City employees.
The Administrative Team establishes goals and manages the operations of the HR
department.
Benefits ensure employees have comprehensive and competitive benefits
packages including, medical, dental, vision and life insurance programs, a large
portfolio of voluntary benefits, and an employee health clinic.
Compensation and Classification are responsible for ensuring that the City
maintains a competitive and equitable position with respect to pay. This is
achieved by conducting numerous salary surveys each year and recommending
necessary market adjustments and general wage increases employees need to
maintain a competitive pay position.
Employee Relations manages all disciplinary actions, and ADA compliance
requests for city employees. Members of this team are the front-line HR
representatives for departments across the City. This team also manages the City’s
leave programs including FMLA and short-term and long-term disability benefits.
Workplace Equity investigates workplace violations of the Equal Employment
Opportunity Act and City policy, ensuring that the City is a safe and enjoyable place
for all to be employed.
Employees’ University manages a robust learning and development program
including new employee orientation, supervisor boot camp, soft skill courses and
access to thousands of online courses.
Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources
196 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS) works closely with IMS to manage
the maintenance and integration of HR’s various technology systems.
Recruiting and Onboarding are responsible for recruiting all positions city-wide
with a focus on a diverse and well-qualified City workforce. Additionally, this team
has developed a comprehensive onboarding and off-boarding process.
Funding for the department is provided by the general and risk funds.
Department Performance Measurements
Performance Measures 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Complete the implementation of
Workday modules in all HR divisions:
HRIS, benefits, education,
compensation and classification,
employee relations and recruiting
and onboarding.*
ongoing ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Respond to EEO complaints,
including a investigation when
appropriate, in an average of 60 days
or fewer.
<60 <60 <60 <60 <60
Each Human Resource Business
Partner will attend a minimum of 30
staff and managerial meetings within
their respective departments per
year.
>30 >30 >30 >30 >30
Increase participation in financial
wellness programs offered to
employees by Salt Lake City by 5%. *
n/a**n/a**>.05 >.05 >.05
Decrease the "time-to-fill" job
recruitment timeframe for
historically hard-to-fill positions by
5%, City-wide. *
n/a**n/a**>.05 >.05 >.05
*New goal in 2023
**Data unavailable
Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources
197 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer
FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 4,394,245 4,905,089 5,419,467
O & M 32,137 69,283 67,946
Charges & Services 46,230,690 54,916,137 59,539,619
Transfers Out — 3,442,361 —
Total Human Resources 50,657,072 63,332,869 65,027,032
DIVISION BUDGETS
Administration 737,762 841,838 1,136,726 22.40
Recruiting & Onboarding 855,962 1,043,669 —
Education 282,505 349,134 415,745 2.00
Civilian Review Board 177,260 186,564 428,993
HR Information Systems 465,242 598,140 380,448
Employee Relations 1,203,380 1,639,955 1,701,873 9.00
Compliance — — 1,075,802
Insurance 46,934,961 58,673,569 59,887,445 4.60
Total Human Resources 50,657,072 63,332,869 65,027,032
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 3,722,111 4,659,300 5,059,723 33.40
Risk Management Fund 46,934,961 58,673,569 59,967,309 4.60
Total Human Resources 50,657,072 63,332,869 65,027,032
FTE by Fiscal Year 36.00 38.00 38.00
Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources
198 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
5,419,467
O & M
67,946
Charges & Services
59,539,619
Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources
199 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Debra Alexander, Chief Human Resources Officer
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted General Fund budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 139,302
Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 15,821
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 43,715
This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Human Resources Department as described
in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 177,135
This increase reflects the Department of Human Resource's portion of the salary proposal described
in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 24,450
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Salt Lake City Department of Human Resources
200 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
201 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Information Management
Services
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
Modernize municipal government through sustainable technology solutions.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission is to be a trustworthy and valued partner that delivers the right
information to the right audience at the right time.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
Salt Lake City’s Information Management Services department assists Salt Lake City
employees in providing essential city services through technology. The department
has six divisions:
Office of the CIO
The Chief Information Officer (CIO) is the Information Management Services
department director and leads the administrative office. It works with department
and division heads across the City and partners to deliver technology solutions that
modernize municipal government and connect the City to its constituents. The CIO
has two deputy directors, Nole Walkingshaw and Chad Korb who directly support
him.
The Financial Services Team is dedicated to procurement and asset management
and oversees the business and supply chain activities within IMS and for the City
computers and technology distributed throughout the city. They manage the daily
operations of accounts payable, budget, office management duties, procurement,
receiving, management, and disposal of all I.T. hardware and software assets for
the City.
The Enterprise Project Management team coordinates with City departments to
help them navigate I.T. systems and projects. Working with departments, they
create project plans and resource allocations necessary to accomplish the given
task and see the projects and solutions throughout the product life-cycle.
Data Analytics and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Led by the Chief Data Officer/Geographic Information Officer (CDO) (CGO). This
team is responsible for Data Analytics, Data Standards, Data Policies, Smart Cities
initiative, and Enterprise GIS for Salt Lake City. They assist departments in using
data to drive informed decision-making processes. The team also assists the City in
its transparency initiatives by providing easy access methods to City data.
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
202 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Infrastructure Technology and Security Division
Led by the Chief Information Security Officer, this division is responsible for
monitoring and administering the I.T. Infrastructure across the city. The division
consists of Cybersecurity, Network, and Systems Engineering teams. It ensures that
the network, systems, and users hosted in the City have full access to their data in
the most secure manner possible. Responsibilities for this division include
Network and Security infrastructure (across more than 50 locations and 2 data
centers), internet connectivity, unified communications, remote work
infrastructure, cloud infrastructure, enterprise backup systems, wired and wireless
communications, and numerous 3rd party applications among others.
Web and Media Services Division
Salt Lake City Web and Media Services is the in-house enterprise-wide digital
content governance, graphic design, media content, A/V infrastructure, and
broadcasting division of Information Management Services. Our goal is to be a
centralized city-wide service accessible to every department and division.
Communications and Engagement
The Public Affairs Lab(formerly the Civic Engagement Team) serves City staff across
multiple divisions and departments as an internal consultant on engagement and
communications, providing strategy, resources, and support in all stages of public
interaction. This team aims to empower City staff to engage the public across all
channels to reach new audiences, expand digital engagement, and increase
residence satisfaction. This team works to develop and maintain a structured and
scalable workflow with clear goals that align with Mayoral priorities, enable
transparency across departments, use data to measure effectiveness, and
communicate impact of decisions with key stakeholders.
The communications side of this team is responsible for managing social media
accounts representing the Salt Lake City Government. @SLCgov Social Media
channels serve as a digital way to inform, engage, and respond to SLC residents.
We share new ideas, in varied spaces, with different viewpoints reflecting City and
community voices. Through our content we seek to portray the authentic
experiences of those living and working in Salt Lake City, particularly those that
reinforce the administration's goals. This content should be reliable, relevant, and
accessible across platforms and reflective of the demographic and geographic
diversity of our city.
Software Services
Led by the Chief Technology Officer (CTO), the team designs, develops, integrates,
and maintains software solutions that the City procures or develops. They also
maintain City databases and create custom reporting solutions.
The team works with departments to reduce the software footprint and
standardize enterprise solutions. The application portfolio still sits at almost 200
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
203 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
applications, but several enterprise solutions have slowed the growth, and several
antiquated systems have collapsed into new centralized systems. We are also in
the process of modernizing several systems/applications and conducting the move
of many enterprise and departmental software packages to the cloud.”
Innovations Team
This team is led by the Chief Innovations Officer (CINNO). They have been tasked
with modernizing the city processes and procedures to bring a new high level of
efficiency and accuracy. One of their primary assignments is implementing a new
Workday ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system, which will be a multi-year,
multi-million dollar project that will help streamline and improve the finance,
accounting, asset management, and human resources systems.
Field Services Team
Led by the I.T. Technology Support Manager, the Field Services division is
responsible for supporting vast and diverse end-user software and hardware. The
division must also ensure the user data and systems are secure and running at
maximum efficiency. This division, consisting of Network Support Administrators
and Field Support Staff, is responsible for computer systems installation and
maintenance, system failure triage, incident routing, escalation, and monitoring.
Field Services also supports other IMS division field services, help desk services,
and on-site support for all city employees.
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
IMS Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Citywide I.T. assets inventoried
on an annual basis.75%89%82%100%100%
Case Closed by staff within
standard response thresholds
based on priority, severity, and
system.
92%91%TBD 99%99%
Objective and Key Results
(OKR) and Continuous
Feedback and Recognition
(CFR) Program implemented in
department.
40%50%70%100%100%
Projects that followed agile
project management
methodology.
80%85%90%100%100%
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
204 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 11,748,437 15,797,602 51,302,040
O & M 2,168,201 810,939 1,313,045
Charges & Services 7,361,676 12,023,525 1,798,923
Capital Expenditures 1,337,115 4,140,918 135,000
Total IMS 22,615,429 32,772,984 40,526,282
DIVISION BUDGETS
Office of the CIO — — 7,362,119 14.00
Applications Admin & Support Services 2,633,453 3,193,787 4,840,845 12.00
Data Analytics and GIS 676,395 980,073 1,522,562 6.00
Dpt Leadership and Admin Serv / Innovations Team 4,260,109 4,978,858 880,811 7.00
Enterprise Software Services 1,556,875 3,370,570 —
IMS Department Support 3,709,615 7,231,597 —
Info Management Services 317,529 226,800 —
Information Security 378,425 976,238 —
Multimedia Services 1,125,053 1,630,642 2,554,015 11.00
Network Services 1,959,733 3,790,356 5,242,146 20.00
PC Replacement 1,438,385 1,353,316 2,085,733
Software Support Services 4,559,813 5,040,746 16,038,052 31.00
User Support Services 44 — —
Total IMS 22,615,429 32,772,984 40,526,282
FUNDING SOURCES
Information Management Serv. Fund 22,615,429 32,772,984 40,526,282 101.00
Total IMS 22,615,429 32,772,984 40,526,282
FTE by Fiscal Year 92.00 100.00 101.00
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
205 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
51,302,040
O & M
1,313,045
Charges & Services
1,798,923
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
206 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley, Chief Information Officer
Changes discussed below represent changes to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 261,823
Base-to-Base changes compare personal services costs adopted as part of the FY 2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes
in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part
of the current fiscal year.
Insurance Rate Changes 252,321
This reflects an increase in the cost of insurance for the Department of Information Management
Service as described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Pension Changes 63,923
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System
Salary Proposal 528,926
This increase reflects the salary proposal described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
CCAC Salary Adjustments 154,675
The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in
accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC).
Policy Issues
One-time Funding from FY 2023 (2,060,000)
During the approved FY24 budget, IMS was given money to purchase radios for the city in
preparation for the new radio system going live. This was one-time money, and the reduction will
not occur in future years.
FY 2024 Ongoing Budget Adjustments 397,688
Versaterm Case Service & Cellebrite
Reduction Strategy (One-time) (1,000,000)
Reduction of legacy systems and consulting due to the implementation of Workday
Contractual Changes (Ongoing) 1,566,767
Increase cost of Software Services
Inflationary Changes (Ongoing) 783,293
Increased cost based on Inflationary
AV Replacement Program 196,392
The city has audio-visual technology that is aging and is due for replacement.
Radio Replacement Program (Ongoing) 500,000
To maintain and replace the radios purchased during FY23 and FY24 and provide ongoing
maintenance.
Computers and Software for New City FTE in FY25 43,500
New employees at the city will need new additional computers and software. This is the money that
will be used to buy them these devices.
Privacy Officer (10 Months) 134,813
Budget adds 1 FTE to comply with House Bill 491.
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
207 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Department of Information Management Services
208 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Justice Courts
209 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Salt Lake City Justice Court
MISSION STATEMENT
Ensure the highest standards of justice, professionalism, responsiveness, and
respect for those we serve.
VISION STATEMENT
Creating a court that is just, equitable, and trusted by all.
COURT CORE VALUES
Excellence
Having the desire to succeed and the motivation to reach our full potential,
going above and beyond to accomplish the task at hand.
Respect
Recognize and appreciate the value of each individual and their experience
and situation.
Integrity
Doing what we say we are going to do, applying honesty and accountability
with openness.
Community
Bridging the gap between the Court, community and other agencies,
improving access to resources and information.
Unity
Supporting one another and fostering growth while reaching our goals and
adhering to our values.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Salt Lake City Justice Court is the largest municipal court in the State of Utah,
with a very high volume of misdemeanor cases. The Court is a limited jurisdiction
court under the umbrella of the Utah State Court system. We are proud to be
part of the Salt Lake City portfolio of public institutions and to serve the citizens
and visitors of this great city.
The Justice Court is responsible for and processes Class B and C
misdemeanors, infractions and small claims cases, jury trials, appeals and
expungements, video hearings, homeless outreach, prisoner transports, and daily
interaction with jails throughout the State of Utah. The court orders, monitors
and tracks probation, warrants, community service, restitution, collections of
monetary penalties, appeals, expungements, and plea-in-abeyance cases. We also
provide community outreach, traffic school, coordination of language interpreter
services, and any ADA needs that arise.
The Justice Court judiciary, employees, and security team are dedicated to open
and transparent access to the Court, bringing justice for all, and providing a safe
and civil environment for dispute resolution.
Salt Lake City Justice Courts
210 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT
Kate Fairchild, Court Administrator
Department Performance Measures
Performance Measures 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target State Average
Access & Fairness - Percent of
Justice Court customers
satisfied with service
received.
NA NA N/A >90%>90%NA
Time to Disposition - 95% of
criminal case dispositions
should meet established
guidelines for Time to
Disposition (6 months).
58%58%64%>95%>95%79%
Age of Acting Pending Cases -
95% of all criminal cases
should have a disposition
within a 180-day time frame.
50%67%73%>95%>95%74%
Criminal Case Clearance Rate
- A Clearance Rate of 100%
means the court has disposed
of as many cases as were
filed, i.e., the court is keeping
up with its incoming caseload.
90%112%102%>100%>100%104%
Salt Lake City Justice Courts
211 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT
Kate Fairchild, Court Administrator
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 4,474,460 4,870,769 5,339,159
O & M 50,740 65,507 58,507
Charges & Services 398,958 544,277 551,277
Capital Expenditures 4,353 9,167 9,167
Total Justice Court 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110
DIVISION BUDGETS
Justice Court 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110 43.00
Total Justice Court 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110 43.00
Total Justice Court 4,928,511 5,489,720 5,958,110
FTE by Fiscal Year 42.00 42.00 43.00
.
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
5,339,159
O & M
58,507
Charges and
Services
551,277
Salt Lake City Justice Courts
212 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY JUSTICE COURT
Kate Fairchild, Court Administrator
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 15,375
Base-to-Base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes (3,125)
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System.
Insurance Rate Changes 90,540
This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Justice Court as described in the
Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 251,987
This increase reflects the Justice Court's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget
Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 25,250
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Policy Issues
Community Outreach Case Manager (Grade 19) (12 Months) 88,363
The Justice Court has increased its efforts with homelessness throughout the community and in the
courthouse. The number of individuals seen in 2024 has increased by 20%, and the number of cases
heard in 2024 has increased 103% since a low in 2022. Due to the increase in services and
expectations, the Mayor is requesting a dedicated Case Manager position who can add depth to
investigate and organize the many needs of this segment of the population. (1 FTE, FOF).
Salt Lake City Justice Courts
213 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Police Department
214 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Police Department
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
“We will build upon the noble traditions of integrity and trust to foster a
culture of service, respect and compassion toward our employees and the
community we serve.”
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
“We will serve as guardians of our community to preserve life, maintain
human rights, protect property, and promote individual responsibility and
community commitment.”
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Salt Lake City Police Department serves more than 200,000 residents of Salt
Lake City with 741 general fund FTEs in budget and 20 FTEs for sworn positions
that are unfunded to facilitate hiring processes for Fiscal Year 25. The Department
consists of the Office of the Chief, which oversees four Bureaus, Field Operations I,
Field Operations II, Administrative & Operational Support Bureau, and Investigative
Bureau.
The Department will continue working to help ensure professional public safety
and response to the community. The Department is working closely with the
Mayor and City Council on a proactive approach to the needs of our community.
The Department is working to increase efficiency by leveraging alternate response
models, including its Police Community Response Team and the use of
technologies. The Department will continue improving policies, increasing
transparency, training, and community involvement while upholding the Mission
and Vision of the Department, serve our community, and improve community
relations.
Under the leadership of Chief Mike Brown, the Department has four primary
objectives: lower violent crime, improve response times, fill all vacant sworn
positions, and increase community outreach.
The Salt Lake City Police Department is proud of the city’s growth trajectory. As Salt
Lake City becomes an entertainment and economic hub in the Mountain West, the
Salt Lake City Police Department will need appropriate growth to scale and achieve
the needs of residents and visitors alike as we look toward future world events,
including the Olympics. The City’s growth is reflected in the Department’s calls for
service. In FY 2023-2024, the Department’s service level for all calls, is trending
above the record set in 2022-2023. The demands on the Department have
required innovation and a strategic approach to manage our resources and
maintain responsiveness for our community members.
Salt Lake City Police Department
215 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mike Brown, Chief of Police
Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Lower violent crime when compared to
previous year +5%(3)%(17)%(5)%(5)%
Improve Response Times for Priority 1
Calls for Service (10 minutes or less)12:46 10:15 10:00 10:00
Fill all vacant sworn positions (0
vacancies) -39 -39 0 0
Increase community outreach events New Measure New Measure New Measure 5 Events per month 10 Events per month
Salt Lake City Police Department
216 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mike Brown, Chief of Police
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 95,727,166 103,346,800 110,644,432
O & M 2,059,922 3,040,484 4,473,979
Charges & Services 4,859,261 4,589,528 4,883,045
Capital Expenditures 372,945 0 0
Total Police 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456
DIVISION BUDGETS
Office of the Chief 10,875,693 11,194,112 15,679,933 31.00
Administrative 14,703,065 13,178,673 247,475 129.00
Police Field Ops 1 27,752,072 32,671,149 0 222.00
Police Field Ops 2 22,191,370 26,340,670 0 214.00
Investigations Division 27,497,094 27,592,208 13,348,455
Investigative Bureau 0 0 2,852,254 171.00
Police Community Outreach 0 0 118,557
Police Airport Division 0 0 15,264,431
Pioneer Patrol Division 0 0 13,784,704
Liberty Patrol Division 0 0 10,964,251
Central Patrol Division 0 0 12,633,613
Police Special Operations Division 0 0 13,594,591
Police Support Services Division 0 0 11,896,448
Police Training Division 0.00 0.00 9,616,743.86
Total Police 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456 767.00
Total Police 103,019,294 110,976,812 120,001,456
FTE by Fiscal Year 750.00 761.00 767.00
Salt Lake City Police Department
217 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
110,644,432
O & M
4,473,979
Charges & Services
4,883,045
Salt Lake City Police Department
218 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mike Brown, Chief of Police
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes (289,598)
Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes (1,497,567)
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System.
Insurance Rate Changes 203,871
This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Police Department as described in the
Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 2,933,477
This increase reflects the Police Department's portion of the salary proposal described in the Budget
Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
CCAC Salary Adjustments 48,464
The budget includes funding to bring non-represented positions in the City to fair market value in
accordance with the Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC).
Health Savings Account 359,750
This budget includes funding to cover increases in Health Savings Account
Budget Amendment #4: Police Clean Neighborhoods 1,829,000
Funding added in budget amendment #4 of FY 2024 for Police overtime.
Policy Issues
Increased Civilian Response One-time Equipment Costs (74,056)
Removing one time equipment costs funded in FY 24 from budget
Increased Airport Operations One-time Expenses (106,680)
Removing one time equipment costs funded in FY 24 from budget
Calls for Service: Overtime Staffing (Ongoing) 1,363,461
Overtime funding for patrol staffing of calls for service
Inflationary Costs (Ongoing) 199,145
Inflationary cost increase for supplies and contracts
Inflationary Costs: Fleet (Ongoing) 232,399
Increasing fleet budget for estimated FY 25 expense
Evidence Drying Locker Replacement (One-time) 60,000
Replacement of evidence drying lockers
Contract, Event, Task Force Overtime (Revenue Offset) (Ongoing) 1,434,295
Budget for staffing of contract and special event overtime that has associated revenue
Airport Staffing and Equipment (Revenue Offset) (Ongoing) 2,328,683
Budget increase for 6 additional officers and equipment for airport staffing
Salt Lake City Police Department
219 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Police Department
220 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2023-24
Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands
221 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Department of Public Lands
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
Provide a vibrant system of connected public landscapes and living infrastructure
that enhances the community’s identity, sense of place, and quality of life.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
Salt Lake City shall enhance the livability of the urban environment to ensure that
the resources under our management are carefully stewarded and equitably
accessible for future generations.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Department of Public Lands’ five divisions are tasked with the planning,
construction, coordination, maintenance, operations, and acquisition of Public
Lands with a community-based approach. In coordination with our many City
partners, we protect, grow, and enhance natural landscapes, trees, and outdoor
green spaces for the health, beauty, and recreational opportunities of residents
and visitors to the Capital City.
Administrative Services Division: provides leadership, project support, budget
support, and long-term strategies and initiatives through communications, public
outreach, finance, technology, information management, and policy development.
Parks Division: Is the steward of and responsible for the oversight of 864 acres of
park lands (City Parks), SLC Cemetery (130 acres), and the Regional Athletic
Complex (118 acres). The Salt Lake City Parks Division ensures the preservation,
development, and maintenance of parks throughout the city for the use and
enjoyment of community members and visitors to Salt Lake City. The Division's
new motto sums up the focus of the team: "Keeping Parks Clean, Green, and Safe".
Golf Division: Manages the operations of six full-service golf courses throughout
the city. Golf operations include the maintenance of all green spaces, programming
of golf clinics, tournaments, leagues, instruction programs and the management of
the course retail pro shops, cafes, and driving ranges and cart fleet maintenance
and rentals.
Planning & Design Division: Oversees planning efforts including master plans,
facility improvement plans, impact fee spending, facility improvement plans,
community engagement, and resource management plans, as well as design
development and implementation of Departmental capital projects and initiatives.
This includes adding park acreage, increasing level of service and adding new and
renovated assets.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands
222 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Trails & Natural Lands Division: Manages the management and care of
approximately 2,000 acres of Natural Lands and shared management of an
additional 6,000 acres located in the Salt Lake City Foothills. These lands consist of
riparian corridors, wetlands, trails, wildlife preserves and critical lands within the
Foothills. The divisions primary focus is on advancing the ecological health and
biodiversity of the public lands system and improving the quality, accessibility, and
equity of natural lands and resources for habitat protection and sustainable
recreational use.
Urban Forestry Division: Manages approximately 90,000 trees with 25,000
potential planting sites (located in city parks, on city facility properties, and along
city streets and trails). The program provides most services related to the
maintenance of city trees including; tree pruning, tree planting, removal, health
evaluation, emergency response, project plan review/permit issuance, storm
cleanup/pickup and hazard assessment.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS
Kristin Riker, Director
Department Performance Measures
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual FY24 Target FY25 Target
TRAILS & NATURAL LANDS: # of
active biodiversity enhancement
projects
2 4 6 10 15
FORESTRY: Ratio of trees planted to
trees removed (a number greater
than one indicates expansion)
1.61 2.05 1.59 1.6 1.6
GOLF: Revenue Per Start $30.38 $32.12 $32.49 $30.00 $30.00
PARKS: Ratio of maintained acres per
maintenance FTE 11.46 13.85 12 14 13
*FY 24 are goals only.
**Year over year numbers fluctuated due to FY20 & FY21 Covid 19 factors.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands
223 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS
Kristin Riker, Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 18,313,641 22,760,598 24,776,666
O & M 6,519,784 4,142,435 4,354,641
Charges & Services 8,187,415 10,444,500 12,144,489
Capital Expenditures 715,585 7,376,295 8,372,951
Debt Principal — — 413,761
Interest & Bond Expenditures 135,292 510,427 114,452
Depreciation & Amortization 760,237 — —
Total Public Lands 34,631,954 45,234,255 50,176,960
DIVISION BUDGETS
Public Lands Administration 5,473,498 3,547,945 3,752,082 19.85
Parks 12,247,383 15,444,530 15,982,287 84.85
Planning and Ecological Services — — 6,239,884 43.15
Urban Forestry 3,141,141 3,526,680 3,734,071 18.00
Golf 10,163,906 17,938,984 20,468,635 34.15
Total Public Lands 34,631,954 45,234,255 50,176,960
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 24,468,048 27,295,271 29,716,013 165.85
Golf Fund 10,163,906 17,938,984 20,460,948 34.15
Total Public Lands 34,631,954 45,234,255 50,176,960
FTE by Fiscal Year 177.00 192.00 200.00
FY 2024 Department Budget
Personal Services
24,776,666
O & M
4,354,641Charges & Services
12,144,489
Capital Expenditures
8,372,951
Bonding/Debt/Interest Charges
413,761
Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands
224 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC LANDS
Kristin Riker, Director
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Base-to-Base 126,350
Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 75,806
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 223,950
This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Department of Public Lands as
described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 664,046
This increase reflects the Department of Public Lands portion of the salary proposal described in the
Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 88,425
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Policy Issues
T&NL New Properties & Growth and Use Impacts One-time Operational Expenses (6,750)
FY24 budget included one time costs for foothill trails maintenance program startup cost for tools,
equipment, and materials.
Contractual Increases (Ongoing) 796,800
The Public Lands Department has experienced operational expense increases related to inflationary
and other contractual price increases. The budget includes funding for cost increases to multiple
expense categories related to utilities, fleet fuel and maintenance, operational contracts, and
supplies.
Glendale Park Phase I (Ongoing) 106,800
The budget includes funding for ongoing maintenance the new Glendale Park Phase I. Phase 1
includes playground, basketball court, mutli-use grass area, pavilion, shrub beds, art and parking lot
with planted islands.
Glendale Park Phase I: Maintenance Tech III (AFSCME 119) (10 Mos) 76,700
The budget includes funding for a Parks Maintenance Tech III position to provide landscape
maintenance at Glendale Park Phase I. (1 FTE, FOF)
Public Lands Project Coordinator (Grade 26) —
The budget includes a Project Coordinator to review, inspect and coordinate new maintenance
projects with City staff, park supervisors, and contractors. Funding is to be identified within the Public
Lands seasonal personnel budget.
Senior Public Lands Planner (Grade 31) (10 Mos) 121,979
The budget includes funding for a Senior Public Lands Planner to support Parks projects. (1 FTE, FOF)
Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands
225 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FTE Operational Expense (Ongoing) 4,000
The budget includes funding for the Senior Public Lands Planner operational expenses.
Senior Landscape Architect (Grade 34) (10 Mos) 138,636
The budget includes funding for a Senior Landscape Architect to support Parks projects. (1 FTE,FOF)
FTE Operational Expense (Ongoing) 4,000
The budget includes funding for the Senior Landscape Architect operational expenses.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands
226 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
227 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
The Department of
Public Services
The Department of Public Services provides essential services to residents,
businesses, and visitors; capital improvement project development and delivery;
and internal services that support all other City functions. The department’s vision
is to be responsive to and anticipate the needs of a growing, diverse, and vibrant
city. Department funds come from the General Fund and the Fleet Fund.
MISSION STATEMENT
Public Services is a team of professionals who value integrity, diversity, and equity.
We are committed to providing essential municipal services and accessible public
spaces for Salt Lake City by investing public funds effectively, efficiently, and
sustainably to make life better throughout the community.
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
Administrative Services under leadership of the Department Director, provides
leadership, project support, strategy, and vision to the department while
establishing standards and processes for transparent, accountable, and data-
driven solutions that aim to better serve the public and enhance City assets.
Administrative Services Division functions include technology implementation,
internal and external communications, finance, special projects, information
management, strategic planning, and policy and procedure tracking for
department management. Most recently, the city-wide internal security program
has been established and resides within this Division.
Compliance is responsible for providing the efficient and effective delivery of the
following services:
•Enforce City codes relevant to parking, food cart vendors, sidewalk
entertainers, and impoundment.
•Process customer service requests from residents and business owners.
•Enforce vehicle idling violations.
•Manage vehicle impound operations with contracted vendor.
•Recruit and supervise school crossing guards at State required intersections.
•Maintain and service parking pay stations.
•Manage operations and access of the Library Parking Garage.
Engineering as required by State code, manages procurement and construction of
City-funded capital projects sponsored by other divisions and departments.
Engineering is also responsible for data mapping used by internal and external
staff, all survey work, controls for subdivisions, and new roadways.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
228 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Facilities is responsible for the stewardship of 83 City-owned buildings, totaling
more than 2.54 million square feet and an additional 1.76 million square feet of
public plazas, rights-of-way, green ways, and trails in the Downtown and Sugar
House business districts. Facilities manages the Capital Asset Program that tracks
the condition of each facility, schedules repair and replacement, quantifies
deferred capital renewal, and projects costs to preserve assets over their lifetime.
Fleet maintains City-owned vehicles and equipment; supplies and monitors fuel at
15 locations; manages a vehicle pool; and maintains a truck wash-out facility. Fleet
prepares utilization and performance data that is used to optimize the fleet while
supporting the City’s environmental goals. The division is actively involved in
securing a plan for electric infrastructure.
Streets is responsible for the following Streets is responsible for the following operations on City-owned roadways:
•Repair and apply surface treatments on asphalt roadways as well as pothole
repair, and asphalt mill and overlay.
•Manage public-way concrete program which includes the upgrade of concrete
ADA ramps, concrete replacement through the 50/50 or 100% cost-share
program, and sidewalk trip and fall mitigation.
•Concrete road maintenance including joint sealing and limited slab
replacement.
•Control snow and ice on roadways, protected bike lanes, and viaduct sidewalks.
•Maintain signalized intersections’ signals, flashing crosswalks, and electronic
traffic control devices, providing after-hours coverage for emergency response.
•Perform annual inspections, installations, maintenance and replacement of
traffic signs and painted roadway markings.
•Street sweeping to protect the storm water drainage system while providing a
clean, well-presented City.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
229 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Jorge Chamorro, Director
Department Performance Measurements
Performance Measures FY2021 Actual FY2022 Actual FY2023 Actual FY2024 Target FY2025 Target
COMPLIANCE: maintain full
coverage of required school
crossings, with crossing guard staff
during the school year.
100%100%100%100%100%
ENGINEERING : Number of Public
Way Permits Issued 2,670 2,311 2,280 2,300 2,300
FACILITIES: Maintain productivity of
total tasks completed on time.71%75%75%75%77%
FLEET: Maintain mechanic
productivity rate during work hours
at 90% or greater
88%92%88%90%90%
STREETS: Complete mileage
projected for mill and overlay as
maintenance treatment (new metric
in 24)
N/A N/A N/A 5 miles 10 miles
ADMINISTRATION: Complete
building vulnerability assessments
(new metric in 24). Measured in
number of buildings assessed.
N/A N/A N/A 10 20
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
230 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Jorge Chamorro, Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 28,402,415 35,037,078 36,201,015
O & M 13,004,305 15,446,523 15,423,843
Charges & Services 9,743,635 10,705,136 12,723,538
Capital Expenditures 932,901 10,748,547 790,423
Equipment Expense — — 7,008,420
Interest & Bond Expenditures 200,872 3,355,903 —
Depreciation & Amortization 6,541,984 0 0
Transfers Out 291,434 654,855 2,061,893
Total Public Services 59,117,546 75,948,042 74,209,132
DIVISION BUDGETS
Administrative Services 2,731,989 3,623,427 4,263,050 20.00
Engineering 5,830,427 7,194,606 7,412,570 51.00
Compliance 3,064,105 4,574,427 5,003,106 32.00
Facility Services 11,413,240 11,980,848 13,042,062 58.00
Fleet 21,787,416 32,498,750 27,947,665 49.00
Streets 14,290,369 16,075,984 16,540,679 116.00
Total Public Services 59,117,546 75,948,042 74,209,132
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 37,330,130 43,449,292 46,261,467 277.00
Fleet Fund 21,787,416 32,498,750 27,947,665 49.00
Total Public Services 59,117,546 75,948,042 74,209,132
FTE by Fiscal Year 308.00 319.00 326.00
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
231 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personal Services
36,201,015
O & M
15,423,843
Charges & Services
12,723,538
Capital Expenditures
790,423
Equipment Expense
7,008,420
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
232 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Jorge Chamorro, Director
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 202 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base to Base Changes 92,358
Base to base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to
actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in
this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay
adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefits changes that happened in the first part of
the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 33,080
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah state pension system.
Insurance Rate Changes 134,884
This increase reflects a change in the cost of insurance for the Department of Public Services as
described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 354,785
This increase reflects the Department of Public Services portion of the salary proposal described in
the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Account 113,472
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Budget Amendment #3: Road Marking Maintenance (Ongoing) 200,000
Funding will be used to address the increased inventory of assets on the right of way, including bike
lane markings, bike racks and posted signs.
Policy Issues
Mill and Overlay Pilot Program (130,000)
The reduction reflects the conclusion of this pilot. The program will be consolidated in FY25 with
funding as reflected in the budget.
Environmental Engineer One-time Expenses (18,000)
Reduction of start up cost for FTE added in FY24.
Building Administrator One-time Expenses (2,750)
Reduction of start up cost for FTE added in FY24.
Contractual Increases (Ongoing) 603,308
The budget includes funding to cover expected rate increases in contracted services.
Inflationary Increases (Ongoing) 340,109
Funding is intended to cover inflationary impacts on ongoing expenses.
Internal Security Program - Consultant Costs (One-time) 75,000
Funding is intended to support the Security Director performing vulnerability assessments.
Incentive for RV Removal and Disposal (One-time) (FOF) 100,000
Additional funding for the Compliance Division to continue promoting the proper disposition and
timely removal of vehicles deemed a nuisance.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
233 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Engineer IV (Grade 31) (10 Months) 117,210
Funding will enable the Engineering Division to enforce construction violations occurring in the public
right-of-way (ROW). (1 FTE)
Project Delivery Support for Parks Projects (10 Months) 249,694
The budget includes funding for two FTEs to add capacity to support the Planning and Design
Division in the Public Lands Department. (2 FTE)
Rapid Intervention Team (Following Pilot) (10 Months) 253,026
Consolidates the pilot program and extend the capabilities of the RIT with an additional crew of
Cleanup Equipment Operators for small public way rehabilitations and manual cleanup services. (3
FTE, FOF)
Mill and Overlay Increase (One-time) 296,000
Consolidates the pilot program, increasing capacity to achieve additional lane miles of treated
roadways.
Reclass Seasonal to Sign and Markings Technician (2 FTEs) (Ongoing) —
Conversion of seasonal staff to add year-round capacity to the maintenance crews responsible for traffic signs and markings.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Services
234 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities
235 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Department Of Public Utilities
DEPARTMENT MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT
To serve our community and protect our environment by working to continuously
improve water, wastewater, stormwater, and street lighting services in a
sustainable manner. We strive to uphold the values of Service, Leadership,
Integrity, Flexibility, Efficiency, and Stewardship.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) provides water, sewer,
stormwater, and street lighting services. SLCDPU provides sewer, stormwater, and
street lighting to the approximately 200,000 residents of Salt Lake City. The service
area for SLCDPU’s water utility is much larger and provides drinking water to more
than 360,000 people in Salt Lake City and portions of Mill Creek, Holladay,
Cottonwood Heights, Murray, Midvale, and South Salt Lake. SLCDPU manages the
four utilities as separate enterprise funds under one administrative management
structure. SLCDPU develops and implements fees, rates, and rate structures that
are approved annually by the Salt Lake City Council.
SLCDPU's work in each of its four utilities is vital to public health, environment,
economy, and quality of life. Our 493 employees are responsible to ensure the
environment is protected, and that the public has access to clean, reliable, and
affordable water resources. SLCDPU is extremely accountable to the public in its
implementation of these services. In fulfilling this important responsibility, SLCDPU
is regulated by (1) federal and state agencies pursuant to the federal Safe Drinking
Water Act and Clean Water Act, and the state’s drinking water and water quality
statutes and rules; (2) federal and state statutes regarding water resources, water
quality, and flood control; and (3) local health department regulations concerning
drinking water and wastewater. SLCDPU, in turn, enforces numerous regulations
concerning water, stormwater, and sewer, primarily contained in Chapter 17 of Salt
Lake City’s ordinances. SLCDPU is also responsible for regulating the Riparian
Corridor Overlay Zone found in Chapter 21 of Salt Lake City’s ordinances.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities
236 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
Laura Briefer M.P.A., Director
Department Performance Measurements
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Water Quality: Water Quality Turbidity
is a measure of water clarity by
indicating how cloudy it is. The
national benchmark is less than 0.1
Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU).
0.03 NTU 0.0282 NTU 0.0234 NTU <0.1 NTU <0.1 NTU
Energy Use: AWWA Water-Energy
Efficiency median is 6,881 thousand
British thermal units per year per
million gallons (Kbtu/yr./MG).
1,902 Kbtu/yr/MG 2607 Kbtu/yr/MG 1,905 Kbtu/yr/MG 1,840 Kbtu/yr/MG 1,840 Kbtu/yr/MG
Water Use: Average Per Capita Water
Use in Gallons per Capita per Day
(gpcd as of 12/31).
193 gpcd 166 gpcd 163 gpcd <200 gpcd <200 gpcd
Sewer: Clean greater than 35% of the
sewer collection system.45% of System 45% of System 44% of System >35% of System >35% of System
Stormwater: Linear feet (LF) of lines
replaced, rehabilitated, or installed.13,541 LF 18,935 LF 18,956 LF*21,700 LF*21,700 LF*
*Target based on annual CIP planning.
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities
237 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
Laura Briefer M.P.A., Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 38,899,254 54,251,832 58,717,106
O & M 6,237,282 9,761,269 11,767,840
Charges & Services 53,911,642 68,863,756 80,939,069
Capital Expenditures (97) 334,049,662 7,900,000
Debt Principal — — 14,425,111
Debt Interest and Fiscal Charges 23,577,318 41,267,908 32,941,996
Building Expense 0 0 277,865,333
Improvements Expense — — 4,650,000
Equipment Expense 0 0 4,783,500
Infrastructure Expense 0 0 59,125,000
Deprecition & Amortization 23,829,918 — —
Transfers Out — 583,605 —
Total Public Utilities 146,455,317 508,778,032 553,114,955
DIVISION BUDGETS
Public Utilities Administration 7,419,074 9,029,919 17,241,502 48.00
Public Utilities Finance 40,848,012 29,806,655 114,261,885 51.00
Public Utilities Engineering 4,569,791 8,892,720 66,714,178 53.00
Water Quality 29,682,804 36,445,186 76,343,354 58.00
Water Reclamation 10,626,539 14,065,437 230,479,108 71.00
Water Resources 1,516,166 2,915,791 2,985,915 8.00
Public Utilities Operations and Maintenance 23,100,318 28,448,446 40,617,277 186.00
Public Utilities GIS and IT 2,573,768 3,856,308 4,471,736
CIP and Debt Service 26,118,845 375,317,570 —
Total Public Utilities 146,455,317 508,778,032 553,114,955
FUNDING SOURCES
Street Lighting Fund 5,054,978 6,044,149 6,776,763 2.35
Water Fund 82,224,402 177,953,787 206,304,772 295.99
Sewer Fund 48,156,069 301,832,622 311,873,824 130.88
Storm Water Fund 11,019,868 22,947,474 28,159,596 45.78
Total Public Utilities 146,455,317 508,778,032 553,114,955
FTE by Fiscal Year 460.00 476.00 475.00
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities
238 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personnel Services
58,717,106
O & M
11,767,840
Charges & Services
80,939,069Capital Expenditures
7,900,000
Debt Principal
14,425,111
Debt Interest and Fiscal Charges
32,941,996
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities
239 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
240 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
241 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Redevelopment Agency
Of Salt Lake City
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT AND CORE VALUES
The mission of the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) is to revitalize
neighborhoods and business districts to improve livability, spark economic growth,
and foster authentic communities, serving as a catalyst for strategic development
projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public
spaces, and environmental sustainability.
We foster a set of core values that collectively support the revitalization of Salt Lake
City’s communities:
ECONOMIC GROWTH We act as a responsible steward of public funds, taking a
long-term view of investment, return, and property values.
COMMUNITY IMPACT We prioritize projects and programs that demonstrate
commitment to improving equity and quality of life for residents and businesses in
Salt Lake City.
NEIGHBORHOOD VIBRANCY We cultivate distinct and livable built environments
that are contextually sensitive, resilient, connected, and sustainable.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
Since 1969, the RDA has played a pivotal role in revitalizing many areas of Salt Lake
City. Under the Utah Community Development and Renewal Agencies Act, the RDA
has the charge and financial tools to address blight and disinvestment in specific
parts of the City. By working with communities and development partners, the RDA
is transforming areas suffering from social, environmental, physical, or economic
challenges into neighborhoods and commercial districts that are characterized by a
variety of useful amenities, vital housing opportunities, successful local businesses,
connected public spaces, renewed infrastructure, and public art. As the owner of
the Gallivan Center, the RDA also works with the adjacent property owners to
oversee the maintenance and programming of the 3.5-acre downtown plaza.
To accomplish its goals to enhance livability and trigger economic investment, the
RDA utilizes a robust set of financial, planning, and revitalization tools to support
redevelopment within communities throughout the City. The RDA achieves its
goals through direction from its RDA Board of Directors (the same members as the
Salt Lake City Council) and is administered by its Executive Director (Salt Lake City
Mayor). Together with the Gallivan Center, the RDA has a total of 35 positions led
by the Director and Deputy Director. The staff conducts the daily operations of the
RDA as well as the maintenance and operations of the Gallivan Center.
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
242 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Danny Walz, Director
FY 2021-22 Actuals FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget
FY 2023-24 Recommended Budget
FY 2023-24 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personal Services 1,588,385 2,480,095 2,766,591
O & M 2,234,307 1,300,000 535,000
Charges & Services 29,967,989 22,452,621 54,339,133
Interest & Bond Expense 3,973,156 10,746,989 9,644,668
Capital Expenditures 6,054,782 14,278,181 841,900
Transfers Out — 12,043,013 16,529,592
Total RDA $ 43,818,619 $ 63,300,899 $ 84,656,884
DIVISION BUDGETS
Administration 3,193,068 3,998,655 5,167,581 21.00
Block 67 CRA 365,771
Block 70 5,766,465 10,915,154 11,065,164
Central Business District 24,008,623 27,596,650 29,893,016
Primary Housing Fund (CWH TI) — 1,599,880 3,602,241
Depot District 2,134,389 4,049,587 7,095,401
Granary District 644 648,546 1,748,249
Housing Development Fund — 5,230,000 2,902,000
North Temple 224,914 449,053 1,952,466
No Temple Viaduct 2,542,885 1,206,609 3,155,765
Northwest Quadrant — 908,100 2,603,998
Westside Community Initiative (NWQ Hsg/UIPA) 1,835,900 500,000 1,835,469
Program Income Fund 1,432,032 1,556,835 1,559,233
Secondary Housing Fund (PAH) 16,478 10,000 1,000,000
Revolving Loan Fund 937,335 345,000 332,400
Stadler Rail — 72,920 168,744
State Street — 2,631,183 6,517,836
9-Line 234,503 1,477,727 3,307,218
West Capitol Hill 1,491,383 100,000 384,332
Total RDA $ 43,818,619 $ 63,295,899 $ 84,656,884
FUNDING SOURCES
Redevelopment Agency Fund 74,179,729 63,300,899 84,656,884 21.00
Total RDA $ 74,179,729 $ 63,300,899 $ 84,656,884
FTE by Fiscal Year 19.00 19.00 21.00
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
243 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FY 2025 DEPT BUDGET
Personal Services
2,766,591
O & M
535,000
Capital Expenditures
841,900
Charges & Services
54,339,133
Interest & Bond Expense
9,644,668
Transfers Out
16,529,592
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
244 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability
245 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Sustainability Department
Overview
VISION STATEMENT
The Sustainability Department supports the vision of leading the way on resilience
and environmental stewardship.
MISSION STATEMENT
The Sustainability Department develops goals and strategies to protect our natural
resources, reduce pollution, slow climate change, and establish a path toward
greater equity, resiliency, and empowerment for the community.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Department of Sustainability aims to develop goals and strategies to protect
our natural resources, reduce pollution, slow climate change, and establish a path
toward greater resiliency and vitality for all aspects of our community. The
Department is organized in two separate divisions: the Waste & Recycling Division
and the Environment & Energy Division. The Waste & Recycling Division is
responsible for managing the City’s regular refuse, compost, and recycling
collection services and is funded by refuse collection fees. The Environment &
Energy Division develops plans and policies to preserve and improve our built and
natural environments and provide residents information on sustainability issues
affecting Salt Lake City. This division is funded primarily by landfill dividends and
recycling proceeds when available. The Department currently operates with 65 full-
time equivalent positions (FTE’s).
Department Performance Measurement
Measure 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Increase percent of residential waste stream diverted from the landfill through recycling and composting
0.372 0.37 0.36 ≥40%≥40%
50% renewable electricity generation for municipal operations by 2023 12% (est)0.12 0.1 ≥50%≥70%
100% renewable electricity generation for community by 2030 0.3 0.31 0.31 ≥30%≥30%
Reduce community greenhouse gas emissions 80% by 2040
4,720,000 (est.)
MTCO2e
4,620,000 (est.)
MTCO2e
4,600,000 (est.)
MTCO2e
≤ 4,620,000
MTCO2e
≤ 5,000,000
MTCO2e
SLCGreen Total social media followers (INSTAGRAM, Facebook, and Twitter)18,254 18,823 19,205 20,350 21,350
Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability
246 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT
Debbie Lyons, Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 5,651,014 6,752,544 7,137,658
O & M 427,198 633,100 731,507
Charges & Services 7,511,721 9,492,684 11,176,601
Capital Expenditures 252,030 8,124,067 3,710,567
Improvements Expense — — 51,000
Debt Principal — — 2,863,727
Bonding/Debt/Interest Charges 59,669 2,986,397 91,832
Depreciation & Amortization 1,968,540 — —
Transfers Out 272,427 275,000 275,000
Total Sustainability 16,142,599 28,263,792 26,037,892
DIVISION BUDGETS
Environment & Energy 1,836,297 2,646,630 2,935,619 8.00
Waste & Recycling 14306302 25617162 23102273.06 57.00
Total Sustainability 16,142,599 28,263,792 26,037,892
FUNDING SOURCES
Refuse Fund 16,142,599 28,263,792 26,037,892 65.00
Total Sustainability 16,142,599 28,263,792 26,037,892
FTE by Fiscal Year 63.00 63.00 65.00
FY 2025 Department Budget
Personnel Services
7,137,658
O & M
731,507
Charges & Services
11,176,601
Capital Expenditures
3,710,567
Improvements Expense
51,000
Debt Principal
2,863,727
Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability
247 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY
Debbie Lyons, Director
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes 86,153
Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024 budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year 2024. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefit changes that happened in the first part of the current fiscal year.
Salary Proposal and Benefit Changes 300,390
This increase reflects a 5% cost of living increase that is being proposed. This includes non-represented and AFSCME represented employees.
Policy Issues
Revenue
Waste & Recycling Residential Service Fee Revenue Increase (Ongoing) 1,619,837
This reflects a 10% increase to residential service fees for waste and recycling collection. Target cash balance for Waste & Recycling is 18% of operating revenue. Projected end-of-year cash balance with this fee increase is 12%.
Waste & Recycling Glass Recycling Fee Increase (Ongoing) 18,780
Curbside and drop-off glass recycling services are provided by a third party contractor. The monthly subscription fee for curbside glass collection is passed on to the customer through their monthly utility bill. The glass recycling fee increase is driven by a 3% CPI increase in contractual fees.
Waste & Recycling Debt Financing Proceeds and Misc Revenue Decrease (One-Time) (4,251,433)
This revenue item is directly related to an equivalent expense to finance capital purchases, and overall is budget neutral.
Energy & Environment Misc Revenue Increase (Ongoing) 34,751
Ongoing owners' distribution from the Salt Lake Valley Landfill is expected to increase by $30,000 and additional miscellaneous interest income is expected to increase by $4,751.
Expense
Waste & Recycling Capital Purchase Decrease (One-Time) (4,013,500)
Capital equipment financed in FY25 will decrease from FY24. The Department purchased more equipment than normal in FY24 due to supply chain limitations in prior years. Waste & Recycling equipment is replaced on a six-year cycle.
Waste & Recycling Public Utilities Billing System Allocation (Ongoing) 889,104
This increase reflects an expected 17% increase in an ongoing transfer to Public Utilities for collecting Waste and Recycling fees. In addition, Public Utilities is developing a new billing system and the Refuse Fund's calculated allocation will be $670,000 per year for the next three fiscal years.
Waste & Recycling Fleet Fuel and CNG Decrease (Ongoing) (44,700)
Fuel cost for the Department is expected to decrease by $44,700 for FY25 based on market outlook.
Waste & Recycling Tipping Fee Increase (Ongoing) 258,000
This increase reflects the change in fees charged at the Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Facility (Landfill) and Waste Management's Recovery Facility (recycling).
Waste & Recycling Fleet Maintenance Increase (Ongoing) 221,524
This reflects an expected 10% inflationary increase over the FY24 adopted budget.
Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability
248 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Waste & Recycling Lease Debt Payment Decrease (Ongoing) (30,838)
This decrease reflects scheduled financial payments for fiscal year 2020 equipment purchases that have ended. Due to supplier chain issues, capital purchases were postponed and thus scheduled financial payments decreased. Supply chain issues have improved so scheduled financial payments should resume in future fiscal years.
Waste & Recycling Operating and Administrative Increase (Ongoing) 107,968
This includes a 3% inflationary increase in glass recycling contract, building repairs and expenses, safety equipment, supplies and apparel. and other miscellaneous expenses.
Salt Lake City Department of Sustainability
249 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
250 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU
Organizational Structure Fiscal Year 2024-25
Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau
251 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
911 Dispatch Bureau
DEPARTMENT VISION STATEMENT
We will strive to partner with our officers and firefighters to create a safe and
healthy community where our citizens can work and live.
DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT
Salt Lake City 911 will maintain a high state of readiness to provide a caring and
committed link between our officers, firefighters, and citizens of Salt Lake City.
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The 911 Communications Bureau provides dispatch services for Salt Lake City and
Sandy City residents. They process all emergent and non-emergent calls in both
municipalities. The dispatchers work cooperatively with the Fire Departments and
Police Departments that they serve and Sandy Animal Services to address the
needs of the public.
The 911 Bureau is managed by an at-will director that reports to the Office of the
Mayor. The total FTEs for the 911 Communications Bureau stands at 100. The
majority of these FTEs answer calls 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, and answered
over 660,000 calls last year. These specialized dispatchers require rigorous training
each year and are held to high standards of quality response.
911 Communications Bureau Performance Measures
Performance Measures 2021 Actual 2022 Actual 2023 Actual 2024 Target 2025 Target
Answer phones within 15 seconds at least 95.24% of the time 95.24%95.34%93.71%95.00%95.00%
Answer phones within 40 seconds at least 98.47% of the time 98.47%98.19%97.42%99.00%99.00%
*911 Comm gathers performance measurement information on a calendar year basis.
Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau
252 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU
Lisa Kehoe, Director
FY 2022-23 Actuals
FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
FY 2024-25 FTE
DEPARTMENT BUDGET
Personnel Services 9,764,164 10,088,793 10,438,033
Operating and Maintenance 46,435 84,984 116,784
Charges & Services 298,518 935,606 905,116
Capital Expenditures 123 150,373 150,373
Total 911 Communications Bureau 10,109,240 11,259,756 11,610,306
DIVISION BUDGETS
Dispatch 10,872,140 11,259,756 11,610,306 100.00
Total 911 Communications Bureau 10,872,140 11,259,756 11,610,306
FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund 10,109,240 11,259,756 11,610,306 100.00
Total 911 Communications Bureau 10,109,240 11,259,756 11,610,306
FTE by Fiscal Year 100.00 100.00 100.00
FY 2024 Department Budget
Personnel Services
10,438,033Operating and Maintenance
116,784
Charges & Services
905,116
Capital Expenditures
150,373
Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau
253 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
SALT LAKE CITY 911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU
Lisa Kehoe, Director
Changes discussed below represent adjustments to the FY 2023-24 adopted budget.
Personal Services Base-to-Base Changes (113,642)
Base-to-base changes compares personal services costs adopted as part of the FY2024
budget to actual personal services costs paid during the first pay period of the calendar year
2024. Changes in this category incorporate changes in personal services at the individual staff
level, including pay adjustments, reclassifications, career ladders, and benefit changes that
happened in the first part of the current fiscal year.
Pension Changes 14,904
The budget includes changes as required for participation in the Utah State Pension System.
Insurance Rate Changes 180,062
This increase reflects a change in insurance costs for the 911 Communication Bureau as
described in the Budget Summary section of the Budget Book.
Salary Proposal 206,976
This increase reflects the 911 Communication Bureaus portion of the salary proposal
described in the Budget Summary portion of the Mayor's Recommended Budget Book.
Health Savings Plan 62,250
The budget includes an increase as described in the Budget Summary
Salt Lake City 911 Communications Bureau
254 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
General Fund Requests Overview
Municipal Contribution/Civic Support
Salt Lake City Arts Council 800,000 800,000 1,000,000
SL Area Chamber of Commerce 50,000 55,000 55,000
Sugar House Park Authority 218,891 270,251 236,597
Diversity Outreach — 3,000 3,000
Utah League of Cities and Towns 221,922 233,474 243,347
National League of Cities and Towns 12,797 12,797 12,797
Tracy Aviary 719,367 763,526 814,173
Sister Cities 8,208 10,000 30,000
ACE Fund (Previously Signature Events) 193,250 200,000 300,000
Dignitary Gifts/Receptions/Employee Appreciation 4,258 170,000 170,000
Housing Authority Transitional Housing 197,291 85,000 85,000
Regional Economic Development Funding 108,000 108,000 108,000
US Conference of Mayors — 12,242 14,242
Jordan River Membership — 16,000 16,000
Rape Recovery Center 30,000 30,000 30,000
YWCA - FJC Wrap Around Services 45,000 45,000 45,000
Housing Assist Program - Rental Assistance 147,794 — —
DAQ Lawnmower Exchange — 230,000 —
National League of Cities Conference — — —
Salt Lake City Foundation — 3,000 3,000
World Trade Center Membership 50,000 50,000 50,000
Local Business Marketing Program 20,000 20,000 20,000
Sorenson Center w/ County 830,498 1,014,800 1,014,800
Transit Key Routes 6,658,272 7,000,000 7,000,000
Home to Transit Program 1,669,331 3,000,000 3,307,807
Outreach New Routes 77,354 100,000 100,000
Hive Pass Pass-Through Expense 440,386 625,648 350,000
Free Bus Passes for School Children, Parents, Guardian, Faculty — — 214,648
Downtown Alliance Safety Ambassador (170,546) — —
Switchpoint Donation — 250,000 —
Suazo Membership 75,000 45,000 45,000
Healthcare Innovation-Biohive 77,690 100,000 100,000
NBA All Star Game 801,796 — —
Open Streets Initiative 150,000 500,000 400,000
Police Department Expungements — — 300,000
Volunteers of America Detox — — 1,000,000
Total Municipal Contribution/ Civic Support 13,436,559 15,752,738 17,068,411
Governmental Transactions
Capital Improvements Project Fund 31,617,831 13,257,591 14,368,191
Fleet Replacement Fund 12,091,900 11,743,350 5,657,993
Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
255 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Transfer to RDA 22,134,598 15,985,753 19,661,505
Transfer to Golf 25,700 —
Golf Fund ESCO 493,239 510,427 528,213
Golf Admin Fee Transfer 339,335 356,302 356,302
Golf IMS Transfer 350,000 350,000 350,000
Rosepark Infrastructure Renewal 500,000 500,000 500,000
Golf Course Living Wage & CCAC (One-time) 370,100 370,100 370,100
Transfer to Water Fund (Assistance) 100,000 200,000 100,000
Transfer to Water Fund (Fire Hydrant Fee) — — 534,469
Housing Sales Tax Plan (Transfer to the Housing Fund) — 1,840,000 2,590,000
Transfer to Governmental Immunity 500,000 — —
Transfer to Refuse Fund (Sustainability) 1,762,126 1,170,900 1,170,900
Transfer to Public Utilities Funds 2,000,000 — 61,000
Transfer to Risk Fund — — —
Transfer to Other Special Revenue Fund 300,000 100,000 100,000
Transfer to Information Management Services Fund — 22,311,740 23,615,477
IFAS Account IMS Transfer — — —
Total Transfers 80,917,282 79,195,089 80,789,352
Interfund Charges
General Fund Costs for Streetlighting 103,682 184,420 184,420
City Data Processing Services 19,676,545 — —
Risk Management Premium 2,970,656 3,911,485 3,879,655
Centralized Fleet Management 6,938,922 7,656,893 7,656,893
Ground Transportation GF Expense 50,000 — —
Total Interfund Charges 29,739,805 11,752,798 11,720,968
Grant Related Programs
Federal Grant Match Account — — —
Total Grant Related Programs — — —
Other Administrative Costs
Legal Defenders 1,404,676 1,645,067 1,724,817
Public Utilities - Land Swap Payment 200,000 200,000 —
10 Year Plan - Airport Trail Reimbursement Required by FAA Corrective Action Plan 103,886 — —
Apprenticeship Program — 630,000 130,000
City Hall Security Improvements (One-time) 500,490 379,450 —
City Hall Police Presence (Ongoing) — 280,350 342,750
City Hall Security: City Hall Public Order Security (Ongoing) — — 99,840
City Hall Security: Protective Detail (Ongoing) — — 120,000
Retirement Payouts 183,000 696,000 696,000
Music Licensing Fees - Moving to IMS 3,635 9,000 —
Contract with U of U for Demographic Project — 50,000 50,000
Washington DC Consultant — 75,000 75,000
Tuition Aid Program 214,222 320,000 320,000
Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
256 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Municipal Elections 39,964 404,551 50,000
Animal Services Contract 1,958,095 1,970,648 2,069,180
Citywide Equity Plan and Training 90,001 — —
Gentrification Mitigation Study 86,849 — —
Protest Response Costs (200) — —
Community Investment Priorities 1,000,000 — —
Police Department Body Cameras 1,547,571 1,549,692 1,692,972
Committee on Racial Equity on Policing — 120,000 —
Police Training 1,458 55,000 —
Police Department Social Worker Funding 218,089 1,840,127 —
Wind Storm Damage (161,951) — —
Boards & Commissions Honoraria — 26,000 —
REP: Increased Mental Health Responders — — 1,133,574
REP: Commission of Racial Equity & Policing — — 120,000
REP: Arbinger Leadership Cohort (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 74,688
REP: Leadership in Police Organization (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 52,500
REP: School Resource Training (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 22,775
REP: Culturally Responsive Therapy for Negative Police Interactions (REP-C) (Ongoing) — — 99,840
Racial Equity & Policing Peer Court — 20,000 —
Racial Equity & Policing Holding Account — 1,781,191 1,531,389
Salary Negotiation Hold — 760,000 —
Salary Contingency — — 2,131,513
Council Lobbyists — 60,000 —
Car and RV Camping Pilot Program 98,729 500,000 —
Return of Op Diversion Funding 490,847 — —
Contingency 2,104 — —
Shooting Range Remediation 121,284 — —
Council - Dignitary Gifts Rece 20,000 —
Fire SCBA — 197,400
Annual Financial Audit 270,100 —
Outdoor Bus Activity Grant Pilot 99,617 — —
PD Substations 113,292 — —
Downtown Streets Enhanced 443,000 — —
2023 Flooding 574,772 — —
Transportation Utility Fee Consultant — 50,000 —
Wasatch Community Gardens — 50,000 50,000
Total Other Administrative Costs 9,333,430 13,762,176 13,490,791
Special Revenue Fund Accounting
Total Special Revenue Fund Accounting 73,300,858 31,130,108 24,062,310
Debt Service Funds
Debt Service Funds 30,343,954 34,894,979 31,556,034
Special Improvement District Funds 82 3,000 3,000
Total Debt Service Funds 30,344,036 34,897,979 31,559,034
Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
257 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Capital Projects Funds
Capital Projects Fund 45,170,816 34,894,979 32,322,843
Impact Fees Fund 7,170,601 — —
Capital Projects Maintenance Fund 4,418,112 — —
Total Capital Projects Funds 56,759,529 34,894,979 32,322,843
FY 2022-23 Actual Budget FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget
Funding Sources
General Fund 133,427,076 120,462,801 123,069,522
Special Improvement Districts Funds 82 3,000 3,000
Miscellaneous Special Service District Fund 1,668,631 1,700,000 1,700,000
Emergency 911 3,800,385 3,800,385 3,913,585
CDBG Operating Fund 4,056,150 5,597,763 5,485,515
Misc Grants Operating Funds 58,621,665 8,919,917 6,644,210
Salt Lake City Donation Fund 3,780,293 500,000 500,000
Other Special Revenue Funds 325,173 400,000 400,000
Housing Funds 1,048,561 10,212,043 5,419,000
Debt Service Funds 30,343,954 34,894,979 31,556,034
Capital Projects Fund 45,170,816 34,894,979 32,322,843
Impact Fees Fund 7,170,601 — —
Capital Projects Maintenance Fund 4,418,112 — —
Total Non-Departmental 293,831,499 221,385,867 211,013,709
Non-Departmental FY 2022-23 Actuals FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget
FY 2024-25 Recommended Budget
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
258 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
General Fund Requests Overview
The Non-departmental portion of the budget provides a financial reporting and budgeting section to account for all
General Fund monies transferred to other funds, grants, and other special revenue funds. It provides accounting for
funds that do not programmatically belong to any particular City department. It includes an accounting of the City’s
debt service and capital improvement programs. It is also used to monitor disbursements of monies for civic
organizations that provide a service on behalf of Salt Lake City but are not legal entities of the City.
Apprenticeship Program (500,000)
A reduction in funding available for the Apprenticeship Program
Salt Lake City Arts Council (Ongoing) (FOF) 200,000
The budget includes an increase in funding for the Arts Council. $117,500 of this additional fund is for City Arts Grants, $2,500 is for increases in Art Barn utilities and the remaining $80,000 is for the increase in the cost of running the Twilight Concert Series, Living Traditions, Busker Fest and the Finch Lane Gallery.
City Hall Security: City Hall Police Presence (Ongoing) (FOF) 62,400
Funding is being recommended for staffing cost for a City Hall police presence on Tuesdays.
City Hall Security: City Hall Public Order Security (Ongoing) (FOF) 99,840
Funding is included for twice monthly City Hall public order security.
City Hall Security: Protective Detail (Ongoing) 120,000
The budget includes funding for the Mayor's protective detail.
Axon Body Camera Enhancements (Ongoing) (FOF) 143,280
Funding is being included to provide enhancements to the City's Axon Body Cameras.
Ace Fund (Ongoing) 100,000
This funding is meant to help cover inflationary increases as well as the increasing number of applications to the
Ace Fund being now being received.
Sister Cities (Ongoing) 20,000
Additional funding is being provided for the City's Sister Cities program to cover membership costs as well as program and diplomatic enhancements in anticipation of the upcoming Olympics bid.
Utah League of Cities and Towns (Ongoing) 9,873
The budget includes an increase in funding for the Utah League of Cities and Towns contract to align with the amount being billed by the organization.
Tracy Aviary (Ongoing) 50,647
The Aviary is requesting an additional $50,647, which includes a 7% CPI increase as well as $40,000 to be used as an offset for water service charges as referenced in their contract with the City.
US Conference of Mayors (Ongoing) 2,000
Funding to cover the anticipated increase in the cost of the US Conference of Mayor’s Membership.
Arbinger Leadership Cohort (REP-C) (Ongoing) (FOF) 74,688
This funding pertains to training that would provide an outward mindset including the following: strategic partnership, inclusion, outward mindset in public safety, strategic planning and execution.
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
259 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Leadership in Police Organization (REP-C) (Ongoing) (FOF) 52,500
This increase would fund a three-week course that explores leadership at different levels in the organization: leading individuals, leading groups, and leading organizations. The course uses the following methods: Applied Learning, Translation of Theory to Practice and Practical Leadership Strategies.
School Resource Training (REP-C) (Ongoing) (FOF) 22,725
The budget includes funding for professional development for all School Resource Officers (SROs) outside the legal basic requirements. This would allow all SROs to stay updated on current practices, and gain a deeper or broader expertise in youth development, as well as other areas pertinent to the field.
Culturally Responsive Therapy for Negative Police Interactions (REP-C) (Ongoing) (FOF) 99,840
This funding is to support grief counseling for family members affected by negative police interactions. The support would ensure that community members have the lowest barrier possible to soliciting counseling services that are culturally responsive and tailored to meet various diverse needs.
Transfer from Fire for Fire Hydrant Fee 241,250
Funding for Fire Hydrant maintenance has traditionally been paid to Public Utilities through the Fire Department budget. This funding will be moved to the Non-Departmental budget.
Fire Hydrant Fee (Ongoing) (FOF) 293,219
Funding is included to cover an increase in costs for Public Utilities to maintain Fire Hydrants in the City.
City Hall Security Improvements FY24 (One-time) (379,450)
The remaining funding for security improvements to the City and County Building will be removed from the budget.
Municipal Elections FY 2024 (One-time) (354,551)
A reduction in funding for various elections related costs in FY 2024.
Sugarhouse Park Authority (One-time) (33,654)
A one-time increase was included in the FY 2024 budget for a portion of the cost of a pavilion replacement in the park. This funding is being removed from the budget.
Transportation Utility Fee Consultant (One-time) (50,000)
Funding provided in FY 2024 for a Transportation Utility Fee consultant is being reduced.
Downtown Street Activation for Summer and Fall 2023 (One-time) (500,000)
The Mayor recommends removing funding for Downtown Open Streets activation that was utilized during the
Summer and Fall months of 2023.
Open Streets - Continuation of Downtown Streets (One-time) 400,000
Funding is being recommended for a continuation of the Downtown Open Streets efforts for the Summer and
Fall months of 2025. Funding will be needed during fiscal year 2025 to cover the costs associated with the
contract for Open Streets.
Police Officer Training (One-time) (55,000)
Remaining one-time funding for police training is being reduced from the budget.
Fleet Replacement Fund Transfer (6,085,357)
The reduction in funding for the Fleet Replacement fund transfer is primarily due to the reduction of $1,700,000 in FOF funding historically used for Streets fleet equipment and the reduction of $4,000,000 in FOF funding historically used for Public Safety apparatus and vehicles. Other changes include a reduction of funding needed for vehicles for newly added positions.
Golf Transfer 17,786
The funding for the Golf transfer is increasing due to a change in the required ESCO payment.
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
260 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
IMS Fund Transfer 1,340,962
The IMS fund transfer is increasing for several reasons, including; $250,000 in funding for the Radio Replacement program to maintain and replace radios purchased during fiscal years 2023 and 2024, the $100,000 reduction of one-time funding for CAP and $10,000 reduction for Spidr Tech software, changes in funding for new positions, increases in costs related to contracts and inflation, the ongoing $397,688 cost of Versaterm Case Service and Cellbrite that was added in BA #4 of FY 2024, the $650,000 reduction in costs for legacy systems due to the implementation of Workday, a $108,757 cost increase for a Privacy Officer position to comply with the requirements of House Bill 491 of this year's legislative session, and $127,648 cost of audio-visual equipment in need of replacement.
Debt Service Funding Transfer 523,676
Changes to the Debt Service transfer include a $815,049 reduction in bond debt service, a $162,600 increase in ESCO payments and an increase of $1,176,125 for the LBA debt service.
CIP Funding Transfer 1,147,642
The CIP funding transfer is being increased by $1,147,642 primarily due to the Public Land's department's transfer of $683,152 in funding back to CIP for maintenance. In the FY 2024 budget, this ongoing funding was used toward vehicles and other one-time costs associated with an increase in parks maintenance positions in the department. Other changes to the transfer include an increase of $560,000 for ongoing CIP commitments and a reduction of $150,000 for Westside art.
Public Utilities: Land Swap (Ongoing) (200,000)
$200,000 has been included annually for several years to cover the cost of a land swap between the City, the County and Public Utilities. The land swap costs have been covered and will now be reduced from the budget.
Public Utilities: Water Usage Study (One-time) (100,000)
Funding for a water usage study / audit for Salt Lake City facilities is being reduced from the budget.
RDA Transfer 2,925,752
The transfer to the RDA fund will increase primarily due to a $3,675,752 increase in RDA Tax Increment funding. Other changes include a reduction of $1.5 million for Gap Financing for Switchpoint's Project on North Temple, Switchpoint and Catalytic Grant Program and Sanctioned Camping Catalytic Grant Program Holding Account. There is also a $750,000 increase to the Housing Plan - Land Discounts and Financing transfer to RDA.
Sustainability: E&E Continuation of Air Quality Incentives (One-time) (230,000)
The budget removes one-time funding for air quality incentives for e-bikes and indoor air quality improvement tools.
Sustainability: Misc Program Efficiency Reductions (Ongoing) (46,200)
Various program reductions.
Boards & Commissions Honoraria (One-time) (26,000)
Funding for Boards and Commissions honoraria is being reduced from the budget.
REP Peer Court Support (20,000)
The budget removes funding for Peer Court.
Legal Defenders (Ongoing) 79,750
An increase in funding for the Legal Defenders contract is being included.
Music License Fees - Moving to IMS (9,000)
The budget for music license fees for the city are being moved from the Non-Departmental budget to IMS.
Salary Contingency (Ongoing) (760,000)
Funding set aside for potential anticipated salary items in the FY 2024 budget is being removed from the FY 2025 budget.
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
261 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Risk: Lifestyle Spending Account (One-time) (500,000)
Funding for the trial Lifestyle Spending Account program undertaken during FY 2024 is being removed from the budget.
Risk: Insurance Premium Increase 468,171
The city is evaluating moving to an insurance carrier from self insurance for workers compensation.
Animal Control Contract (Ongoing) 98,532
The increase required by the County based on the Animal Services contract.
UTA On Demand Service (Ongoing) (FOF) (Ongoing) 307,807
Funding to support contractual increase for the On-Demand Service.
Police Department Expungements (One-time) 300,000
The budget includes funding to reduce a backlog of expungements in process.
Volunteers of America - Detox (One-time) 1,000,000
Funding is being requested for the facility related needs at the Volunteers of America site on Redwood Road.
Salt Lake City Non-Departmental
262 Mayor’s Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Staffing
Document
This page intentionally left blank
Official Staffing Document
Summary for Fiscal Year 2024-25
This section reflects the official staffing document for FY 2024-25. The staffing
document inventories individual positions and pay grade classifications within each
division. It includes the total number of authorized positions and job classifications
for each department by division and fund. The total number of all positions in the
City is tallied on the initial summary page.
Any change made to the City staffing document that increased costs but did not
increase the number of positions was presented to the City Council for review. Any
change in the total number of positions requires the approval of the City Council.
The total numbers of positions are presented for the last two fiscal years (2022-23
and 2023-24), as well as the staffing level for FY 2024-25. Changes from the
previous fiscal year’s budget are noted and explained in the column entitled
Changes from FY 2023-24 to FY 2024-25.
Changes are noted as follows:
RECLASSIFICATIONS
•If a reclassification resulted in a pay grade change only, the notation would be,
for example, Changed to _________/from 29
•If a reclassification resulted in a change of title only, the notation would be, for
example, Changed to _________/from Personnel Director.
•If a reclassification resulted in a change of grade and title, the notation would
be, for example, Changed to_________/from Personnel Director (29)
REORGANIZATIONS
•If a position or part of a position has been transferred to a different part of the
organization the notation would be, for example, Transferred to_________/from
Employee Services.
•If a percentage of the position were transferred, the notation would be, for
example, .25 Transferred to _________/from Employee Services.
•If a position or percentage of a position were transferred to another
department, the notation would be, for example, Transferred to Department
of_________, Division of_________/from Employee Services.
•There will be offsetting notations in the receiving area of the organization to
explain from where the position or percentage of the position was transferred.
NEW POSITIONS
•A position which has been added to the official staffing document in Fiscal Year
2024-25 is noted as New Position.
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
265 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
ELIMINATED POSITIONS
•A position which has been removed from the official staffing document for the FY 2024-25
is noted as Position eliminated.
POSITION HELD VACANT
•A position which is being held vacant in the official staffing document for the
fiscal year 2024-25 is noted as Position held vacant.
POSITION TITLE ABBREVIATIONS
•H indicates an hourly position
•PT indicates a part-time position
•S indicates a seasonal position
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
266 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
STAFFING DOCUMENT SUMMARY
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEARS 2023 THROUGH 2025
Budget Budget Budget FY24-25
DEPARTMENT FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Variance
GENERAL FUND
Attorney's Office 57.50 60.50 66.50 6.00
City Council 36.00 39.00 39.00 0.00
911 Communications Bureau 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00
Community and Neighborhood 190.00 195.00 193.00 (2.00)
Economic Development 22.00 22.00 23.50 1.50
Department of Finance 76.70 81.70 84.70 3.00
Fire 392.00 402.00 406.00 4.00
Human Resources 31.40 33.40 33.40 0.00
Justice Courts 42.00 42.00 43.00 1.00
Mayor's Office 32.00 34.00 35.00 1.00
Police 750.00 761.00 767.00 6.00
Public Lands 143.35 157.85 165.85 8.00
Public Services 262.00 273.00 277.00 4.00
Non Departmental 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 2,134.95 2,201.45 2,233.95 32.50
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Airport 619.30 639.30 664.30 25.00
Golf 33.65 34.15 34.15 0.00
Public Utilities
Street Lighting 2.72 2.57 2.35 (0.22)
Water 288.16 298.21 295.99 (2.22)
Sewer 127.65 130.80 130.88 0.08
Storm Water 40.47 43.42 45.78 2.36
Total Public Utilities 459.00 475.00 475.00 0.00
Sustainability 63.00 65.00 65.00 0.00
ENTERPRISE FUND TOTAL 1,174.95 1,213.45 1,238.45 25.00
INTERNAL SERVICE AND OTHER FUNDS
Information Mgmt Svcs 92.00 100.00 101.00 1.00
Fleet Management 46.00 46.00 49.00 3.00
Government Immunity 9.00 10.00 9.00 (1.00)
Risk Management 7.40 7.70 8.70 1.00
Special Revenue: 1/4 Sales Tax from County 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
INTERNAL SERVICE AND OTHER FUND TOTAL 154.40 163.70 167.70 4.00
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 32.00 34.00 34.00 0.00
TOTAL POSITIONS 3,496.30 3,612.60 3,674.10 61.50
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
267 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
City Council
Council Person xxx 7.00 7.00 7.00
Executive Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director-City Council 39 1.00 2.00 2.00
Legislative & Policy Manager 37 0.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Advisor City Council 37 1.00 0.00 0.00
Associate Deputy Director -Council 37 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Public Policy Analyst 33 2.00 3.00 3.00
Operations Mgr/Mentor 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Facilitator 31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Public Policy Analyst II 31 3.00 3.00 3.00
Council Office Communication Director 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Policy Analyst 31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Policy Analyst/Public Engagement 28 2.00 1.00 1.00
Public Engage/Comm Specialist II 28 1.00 1.00 1.00
Constituent Liaison/Public Policy Analyst 27 2.00 3.00 3.00
Public Engagement & Comm Special 26 3.00 6.00 6.00
Constituent Liaison 26 3.00 3.00 3.00
Assistant to Council Executive Director 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Council Admin Asst 24 5.00 4.00 4.00
RPT Council Staff Asst 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
CITY COUNCIL TOTAL 36.00 39.00 39.00
Mayor Executive Staff
Mayor xxx 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chief of Staff 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Chief Administrative Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief of Staff 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief Administrative Officer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Advisor 39 2.00 0.00 0.00
Communications Director 39 1.00 0.00 0.00
Communications Deputy Director 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Policy Advisor 29 2.00 1.00 1.00
REP Commission Senior Staff Position 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Liaison 26 5.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant 24 5.00 3.00 3.00
Office Manager Mayor's Office 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
268 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Community Outreach Sp & E Coord 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Communication & Content Mgr 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Assistant 19 2.00 2.00 2.00
Mayor Executive Staff Total 27.00 12.00 12.00
Mayor Communication
Communications Director 39 0.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Deputy Director 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Communication & Content Mgr 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Mayor Communication Total 0.00 3.00 3.00
Mayor Policy Advisors
Senior Advisor 39 0.00 2.00 3.00 New Position
Mayor Policy Advisors Total 0.00 2.00 3.00
Mayor Equity Administration
Chief Equity Officer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
REP Commission Senior Staff Position 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Equity Team Member 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Community Liaison 26 3.00 5.00 5.00
Executive Assistant 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Mayor Equity Administration Total 5.00 8.00 8.00
Mayor Community Outreach
Senior Advisor 39 0.00 2.00 2.00
Community Liaison 26 0.00 4.00 4.00
Community Outreach Sp & E Coord 24 0.00 2.00 2.00
Executive Assistant 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
Mayor Community Outreach Total 0.00 9.00 9.00
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TOTAL 32.00 34.00 35.00
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
269 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
911 Dispatch Director 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
911 Dispatch Deputy Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
911 Dispatch Operations Mgr 31 0.00 0.00 4.00 4 Changed from Operations Manager grade 29 to Assistant Director grade 31.
911 Dispatch Operations Mgr 29 2.00 4.00 0.00 4 Changed from Operations Manager grade 29 to Assistant Director grade 31.
911 Dispatch Supervisor 27 10.00 9.00 9.00
911 Dispatch Dispatcher I-III 20 82.00 81.00 81.00
911 Dispatch Dispatcher I-III Unfunded 20 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
911 COMMUNICATIONS BUREAU TOTAL 100.00 100.00 100.00
Office of the Executive Director
Executive Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
ORAT Director 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to Real Estate & Commercial Development
ORAT Specialist 31 0.50 0.50 0.00 1 Transferred to Design & Construction Management
Executive Assistant 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Admin Assist (24)
Administrative Assistant - Appointed 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Executive Assist (26)
Airport Construction Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade changed from 18 to 23
Administrative Secretary 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Technician II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Director's Office Total 5.50 4.50 3.00
Communication and Marketing Division
Director Communication & Marketing 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Director Airport Public Relations & Marketing (38)
Director Airport Public Relations & Marketing 38 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Director Communication & Marketing (38)
Air Service Development Manager 31 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to Real Estate & Commercial Development
Senior Manager Air Services Development 31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Communication Manager 30 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New position
Airport Community Outreach Manager 30 0.00 0.00
Airport Communication Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade changed from 25 to 26
Airport Public Relations Manager 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Communication and Marketing Total 4.00 4.00 4.00
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
270 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Planning and Environmental Division
Director of Airport Plan/Cap Program 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Planning, Environmental & Cap Program Director 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Assistant Planning & Environmental Director (36)
Assistant Planning & Environmental Director 36 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Assistant Planning, Environmental & Cap Program Director (37)
Airport Environmental Program Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade changed from 33 to 34
Airport Senior Environmental Sustainability Coordinator 32 2.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade changed from 31 to 32
Airport Planning & DBE Manager 33 0.00 0.00 2.00 1 Changed from Airport Planner Manager (30) and 1 changed from Airport Senior Planner (30)
Airport Planner Manager 30 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Planning & DBE Manager (33)
Airport Senior Planner 30 3.00 2.00 1.00
1 Changed to Airport Planning & DBE Manager (33), 1 Changed to GIS Programmer Analyst (27), 1 New position
Airport Principal Planner 27 0.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Environmental Sustainability Coordinator 27 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Planning & DBE Programs Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airport Planning Programs Coord (25)
Airport Planning Programs Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Planning & DBE Coord (25)
Associate Planner 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Environmental Specialist II 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Environmental Specialist I 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geographic Information System Mgr 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
GIS Programmer Analyst 27 0.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Airport Senior Planner (30)
Office Facilitator II 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade changed from 19 to 22
Planning and Environmental Total 10.00 15.00 16.00
Finance and Accounting Division
Director of Finance and Accounting 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Controller 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Finance Manager 37 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Construction Finance Manager (33)
Construction Finance Manager 33 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Finance Manager (37)
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 0.00 0.00
Financial Analyst III 30 3.00 3.00 2.00 1 Changed to Accountant III (27); 2 Grade change from 29 to 30
Auditor IV 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Auditor III (28)
Auditor III 28 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Auditor IV (32)
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
271 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Accountant III 27 3.00 3.00 5.00 1 Changed from Financial Analyst III (29); 1 Changed from Accountant II (21)
Warehouse Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Auditor II 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant II 21 3.00 3.00 3.00 1 Changed to Accountant III (27); 1 Changed from Office Facilitator I/II (19)
Airport Procurement Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Accountant I 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport 14 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator I/II 19 0.00 0.00 1 Transferred from Maintenance; 1 Changed to Accountant II (21)
Part-Time/Accounting Intern 0.50 0.50 0.50
Finance and Accounting Total 16.50 15.50 16.50
Maintenance Division
Director of Maintenance 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Maintenance Director 36 4.00 4.00 5.00 1 New position
Airport Maintenance Operations Superintendent 34 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Fleet Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Superintendent 32 0.00 0.00 0.00
Aviation Services Manager 31 2.00 3.00 3.00
Airport Maintenance Ops Support Mgr 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Facilities Assets Manager 31 1.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Maintenance Manager 31 4.00 4.00 5.00 1 Changed from Maintenance Electrician IV (22)
Warranty Commissioning Manager 30 1.00 1.00
Facilities Maint Warranty/Commission Mgr 30 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Tech Systems Analyst IV (28)
Technical Systems Program Mgr 30 1.00 1.00 3.00 2 Changed from Senior Facility Maint Supervisor (27); 3 Grade changed from 29 to 30
Computer Maint Mgmt Systems Administrator 29 2.00 4.00 5.00 1 New position
Computer Maint Systems Supervisor 29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Tech Systems Analyst IV 28 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Facilities Maint Warranty/Commission Mgr (30)
Energy/Utilities Management Coordinator 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airport Energy Manager (27)
Airport Energy Manager 27 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Energy/Utilities Management Coordinator (27)
Airport Fleet/Warehouse Operations Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Contract Administrator 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Facility Maint Supervisor 27 5.00 4.00 2.00 2 Changed to Technical Systems Manager (30)
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
272 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Senior Airport Grounds/Pavement Supervisor 27 4.00 4.00 4.00
Plant Coordinator Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Aviation Srvs Tech Sys Adm 27 1.00 2.00 4.00
1 Changed from Facility Support Coordinator (26); 1 Changed from Facility Maintenance Coordinator (25)
Civil Maint Warranty 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 26 to 28
Facility Maintenance Manager 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
HVAC Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Management Services Supervisor 27 5.00 5.00 5.00 5 Grade change from 25 to 27
Facility Maint Supervisor 25 6.00 7.00 7.00
Airport Signs Graphic Design Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facilities Maintenance Coordinator 25 32.00 33.00 37.00 1 Changed to Aviation Services Tech Services Admin (27); 5 New positions
Airport Maintenance Supervisor 25 11.00 11.00 13.00 2 Changed from Airfield Maint. Euip. Operator I-II-III (16-43)
Electronic Security Technician 24 12.00 14.00 15.00 1 New position
Management Analyst 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Changed grade from 24 to 26
Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Grounds/Pavement Super 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility Maintenance Contract Coordinator 22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Facility Support Coordinator 26 6.00 4.00 3.00 1 Changed to Aviation Services Tech Services Admin (27)
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 4.00 4.00 2.00
1 Changed to Airport Maintenance Manager (31); 1 Changed to Airfield Maintenance Electrician (25); 2 Grade changed from 22 to 24
Airfield Maintenance Electrician 25 21.00 21.00 22.00 1 Changed from Maintenance Electrician IV (22)
Airfield Electrical Supervisor 27 4.00 5.00 5.00
HVAC Tech II 21 8.00 11.00 11.00
Airport Lead Sign Technician 21 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New position
Senior Fleet Mechanic 21 6.00 6.00 6.00
Plumber II 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Procurement Specialist 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Budget & Special Projects Coordinator 20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airfield Main. Specialist I-II-III 16-23 87.00 87 Changed from Airfield Maint. Equip. Operator I-II-III (16-23)
Airfield Maint. Equip. Operator I-II-III 16-23 89.00 90.00 0.00
1 Changed to Senior Florist (18); 2 Changed to Airfield Maintenance Supervisor (25); 87 Changed to Airfield Maint. Specialist I-II-III (16-23)
Airport Lighting & Sign Technician 20 3.00 3.00 3.00
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
273 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Carpenter II 20 9.00 8.00 0.00 8 Changed to General Maintenance Worker (20)
General Maintenance Worker 20 2.00 6.00 22.00 8 Changed from Carpenter II (20); 6 Changed from Painter II (20); 2 New positions
Fleet Body Repair and Painter 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Mechanic I/II 20 20.00 20.00 20.00
Painter II 20 7.00 6.00 0.00 6 Changed to General Maintenance Worker (20)
Office Facilitator I/II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Transferred to Finance & Acct
Facilities Contract Compliance Specialist 19 6.00 6.00 6.00
Facility Maint Contract Repair Tech II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Florist 18 1.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airfield Maint. Equip. Operator I-II-III (16-23)
Airfield Maint. Equipment Oper III 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maintenance Electrician I (Apprentice)17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 4.00 5.00 6.00 1 New position
Warehouse Sup Worker-Airport 14 1.00 0.00 0.00
Fleet Services Worker 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Intern 0.50 0.50 0.50
Maintenance Division Total 301.50 314.50 325.50
Design and Construction Management Division
Director - Airport Engineering 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Director of Design & Construction Management (39)
Director of Design & Construction Management 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Director - Airport Engineering (39)
Assist Director of Design & Construction Management 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Engineer VII (34)
Assist Director of Construction Management 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Senior Engineer Project Manager (34)
Assist Director of Project Delivery 37 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Engineer VI (34)
Engineer VII 36 2.00 2.00 2.00 1 Changed to Assist Director of Design & Construction Mngt (37); 1 Changed from Engineer VI (34)
Airport Architect 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade changed from 36 to 37
Senior Engineer Project Manager 34 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Assist Director of Construction Mngt (37)
Airport Senior Architectural Manager 34 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Senior Architect (36)
Engineer VI 34 2.00 2.00 1.00
1 Changed to Engineer VII (36); 1 Changed from Engineer V (33); 1 Changed to Assist Director of Project Delivery (37)
Airport Tenant Development Manager 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New position
Senior Architect 36 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Airport Senior Architectural Manager (34); 2 Grade change from 33 to 36
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
274 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Geographic Information System Mgr 33 1.00 0.00 0.00
Engineer V 33 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Engineer VI (34)
ORAT Specialist 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Transferred from Office of the Executive Director; 1 Changed to Intern (0)
Airport Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Construction Program Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Construction Manager 28 3.00 3.00 3.00 3 Grade change from 27 to 28
Engineering Tech VI 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
GIS Programmer Analyst 27 2.00 0.00
Management Analyst 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airport Construction Project Coordinator (23)
Engineering Tech V 24 3.00 3.00 3.00
Architectural Associate IV 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech IV 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Construction Project Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Management Analyst (26)
Project Coordinator III 22 2.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Field Technician 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Records Program Specialist 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Intern 0.00 0.00 0.50 1 Changed from ORAT Specialist
Design & Construction Management Total 31.00 28.00 29.50
Operations Division
Chief Operating Officer 40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 39 - 40
Director of Airport Operations 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Operations Director 38 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 New position
Airport Operations Superintendent - Security Comm 35 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Operations Superintendent - Landside 35 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Operations Superintendent - Terminals 35 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Safety, Engagement & Training Senior Manager 32 0.00 0.00 2.00
1 Changed from Safety Management Systems (SMS) Program Manager (31); 1 Changed from Airport Ops Manager - Safety (29)
Airport Operations Manager - Ground Transportation 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 31 to 30
Airport Operations Manager / Parking 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 31 to 32
Safety Management Systems (SMS) Program Manager 31 0.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Safety, Engagement & Training Senior Manager (32)
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
275 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Airport Operations Manager - Terminal/Landside 30 0.00 0.00 4.00
1 Changed from Airport Ops Manager - Airfield (30); 2 Changed from Airport Ops Manager - Terminals (29); 1 New position
Airport Operations Manager - Airfield 30 14.00 15.00 14.00
15 Grade change from 29 to 30; 1 Changed to Airport Ops Manager - Terminal/Landside (30); 14 Grade change from 29 to 30
Airport Operations Manager Airfield/FBO 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 29 - 30
Airport Operations Manager - Terminals 29 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Changed to Airport Ops Manager - Terminal/Landside (30)
Airport Operations Manager -Safety 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Safety, Engagement & Training Senior Manger (32)
Airport Operations Manager - Security 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 29 to 30
Airport Operations Manager / Communications 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Manager - Customer Service 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Customer Service Supervisor 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Training Coordinator 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Safety, Engagement & Training Manager 29 0.00 0.00 5.00 4 Changed from Airport Training Program Manager (29); 1 New position
Airport Training Program Manager 29 0.00 4.00 0.00 4 Changed to Airport Safety, Engagement & Training Manager (29)
Safety Program Coordinator 26 3.00 0.00 1.00 1 New position
Airport Operations Supervisor - Terminal/Landside 26 0.00 0.00 13.00
11 Changed from Airport Landside Operations Supervisor (25); 1 Changed from Airport Ops Supervisor - Airfield (25); 1 New position
Airport Operations Supervisor - Airfield 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Airport Operations Supervisor - Terminal/Landside (26)
Airport Landside Operations Supervisor 25 11.00 11.00 0.00 11 Changed to Airport Operations Supervisor - Terminal/Landside (26)
Airport Operations Duty Agent Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Operations Supervisor / Access Control 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Operations Access Control Coordinator 23 1.00 2.00 2.00
Management Analyst 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 24 to 26
Office Facilitator II 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 19 to 22
Airport Operations Supervisor / Communications 26 5.00 5.00 6.00 1 New position; 6 Grade change from 24 to 26
Airport Operations Training Supervisor Communications 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 24 to 27
Engagement Coordinator 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Operations Specialists - Airfield 23 22.00 22.00 22.00
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
276 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Airport Operations Specialists - Terminal/Landside I-III 23 41.00 77.00 77.00 1 Changed to Airport Operations Agent - FBO (23); 1 Changed from Part-time Ops Tech
Airport Operations Customer Service Representative 23 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 New position
Airport Operations Agent - FBO 24 6.00 6.00 7.00
1 Changed from Airport Ops Specialist - Terminal/Landside I-III (23); 7 Grade change from 23 to 24
Airport Operations Duty Agent 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Employment Services Coordinator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Secretary 18 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Commercial Vehicle Ins 18 3.00 4.00 4.00
Airport Landside Operations Officer 18 36.00 0.00 0.00
Air Operations Security Spec 17 2.00 2.00 2.00
Airport Operations Lead Coordinator 17 4.00 4.00 4.00
Airport Operations Coordinator 16 12.00 12.00 12.00
Airport Operations Coord II 16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Secretary 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Access Control Specialist 15 9.00 9.00 10.00 1 New position
Office Technician II 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Airport Operations Coord I 14 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paging Operator 10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Part-Time Operations Technician 2.50 2.50 1.50
One .5 position changed to Airport Ops Specialist - Terminal/Landside I-III (23); One .5 position eliminated
Part-Time Operations Intern 1.00 1.00 1.00
Regular Part-Time/Paging Operator 10 0.30 0.30 0.30
Operations Division Total 196.80 201.80 209.80
Real Estate & Commercial Development Division
Director Administration and Commercial Services 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
ORAT Director 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Office of the Executive Director
Commercial Manager Airport 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Contracts & Procurement Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Property & Real Estate Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Air Service & Business Development Manager 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1 from Business Development Manager (32)
Business Development Manager 32 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1 to Air Service & Business Development Manager (35)
Air Service Development Manager 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Transferred from Communication & Marketing
Airport Risk Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
277 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Airport Tenant Relations Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Property Specialist II 27 3.00 3.00 2.00 Changed 1 to Airport Property Specialist I 24
Airport Contract Specialist I 27 3.00 3.00 3.00
Commercial Program Coordinator 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1 from Commercial Program Specialist (27)
Commercial Program Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1 to Commercial Program Coordinator (27)
Airport Contracts Specialist II 26 0.00 0.00
Airport Risk Management Coordinator 24 0.00 0.00
Airport Property Specialist I 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1 from Airport Property Specialist II (27)
Admin Assistant / GRAMA Coord 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed 1 to Special Projects Assistant (21)
Special Projects Assistant 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed 1 from Admin Assistant / GRAMA Coord. (22)
Administrative Secretary II 21 0.00 0.00
Administrative Secretary 18 0.00 0.00
Real Estate & Commercial Development Total 15.00 15.00 17.00
Information Technology Services Division
Airport Information Management Services Director 39 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Director Information Technology (39)
Director Information Technology 39 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Airport Information Management Services Director (39)
Airport Information Technology Manager 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 36 to 38
Airport Special Systems Manager 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 36 to 37
Cybersecurity Engineer Manager 37 0.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Tech Systems Superintendent 36 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Network Architect 36 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Cybersecurity Engineer I (35)
Cybersecurity Engineer I 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Changed from Senior Network Architect (36)
Senior Software Engineer 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 34 to 35
Network Engineering Team Manager 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 37 to 38
Network System Engineer III 36 3.00 3.00 5.00 3 Grade change from 33 to 36; 1 Changed from Network Support Admin II (25); 1 New position
Information Tech Support Manager 32 0.00 0.00 4.00
3 Changed from Tech System Program Manager (30); 1 Changed from Network Support Admin I (23)
Network System Engineer II 34 2.00 2.00 1.00 2 Grade change from 31 to 34; 1 Changed to Network Support Admin III (27)
Software Support Admin II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
278 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Technical System Program Manager 30 3.00 3.00 0.00 3 Changed to Information Tech Support Manager (32)
Network Support Team Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 29 to 32
Network Support Administrator III 27 7.00 7.00 12.00
2 Changed from Tech Systems Analyst II (24); 2 Changed from Network Support Admin II (25); 1 Changed from Network System Engineer II (34)
Technical Systems Analyst IV 28 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 Grade change from 27 to 28; 1 Changed from Tech Systems Analyst II (24)
Technical Systems Analyst III 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Network Support Administrator II 25 11.00 11.00 9.00
2 Changed to Network Support Admin III (27); 1 Changed to Network System Engineer III (36); 1 New position
Technical Systems Analyst II 24 3.00 4.00 1.00 1 Changed to Tech Systems Analyst IV (28); 2 Changed to Network Support Admin III (27)
Network Support Administrator I 23 2.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to Information Tech Support Manager (32)
Information Technology Services Division Total 39.00 41.00 43.00
SLC DEPT OF AIRPORTS TOTAL (AIRPORT FUND)619.3 639.3 664.3
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Office of City Attorney
City Attorney 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Manager 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 grade change from 21 to 24
Office of City Attorney Total 2.00 2.00 2.00
Legal Support
General Fund
Deputy City Attorney 40 1.00 1.00 1.00
Division Chief Senior City Attorney 39 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior City Attorney 39 8.50 8.50 10.00 1 new position
Assistant City Attorney 34 0.50 0.50 0.00
First Assistant City Prosecutor 39 2.00 2.00 2.00 2 grade change from 34 to 39
Assistant City Prosecutor 29 3.00 4.00 2.00 2 positions changed to Associate City Prosecutor (33)
Associate City Prosecutor 33 10.00 11.00 13.00 13 grade changed from 27 to 33; 2 positions changed from Assistant City Prosecutor (29)
Paralegal 24 4.50 3.50 3.50 3.5 grade change from 21 to 26
Prosecutor Law Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
279 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Legal Secretary III 21 4.00 4.00 4.00 4 grade change from 18 to 21
Senior Prosecutor Assistant 17 6.00 4.00 2.00 2 Changed to Pros Asst
Prosecutor Assistant 16 4.00 6.00 9.00 1 new, 2 changed from Sr Pros Asst
Legislative Affairs Director 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 proposed grade change from 34
Special Project Analyst 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 new position; potential to change grade
Special Project Assistant 21 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 new position; potential to change grade
Legal Support Total 46.50 47.50 52.50
City Recorder
City Recorder 35 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 proposed to change grade from 35 to 38
Minutes and Records Clerk 21 3.00 3.00 3.00
Deputy Recorder 26 3.00 3.00 2.00 2 proposed to change grade from 26 to 31; 1 changed to Elections Management Coordinator
Elections Management Coordinator 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 changed from Deputy Recorder
Special Projects Analyst 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 1 proposed to change to Business Systems Analyst II (30)
Associate Records Technician 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Boards & Commission Liaison 23 0.00 1.00 1.00 1 proposed to change to Business Systems Analyst I (28)
Office Facilitator 20 0.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Analyst 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 new position
Records Archive Clerk 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Recorder Total 9.00 11.00 12.00
Risk Management Fund
Risk Manager 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade change from 35 to 38
Risk Management Analyst 26 0.00 1.00 1.00 Position is in 6203 Workers Compensation Fund
Risk Management Specialist 24 1.00 0.00 0.00
Risk Coordinator 21 0.00 0.00 0.50 .5 Moved from Gov Imm
Sr. Claims Adjuster 28 0.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Gov Imm
Senior Budget & Policy Analyst 32 0.30 0.30 0.30
Office Facilitator I 18 0.50 0.50 0.00
Subtotal of Risk Management Fund 2.80 2.80 3.80
Governmental Immunity Fund
Division Chief Senior City Attorney 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior City Attorney 39 3.50 3.50 4.00
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
280 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Assistant City Attorney 34 0.50 0.50 0.00 Changed to Sr. City Attorney
Claims Adjuster 24 1.00 0.00 0.00 Moved to Risk Admin
Paralegal 21 2.50 2.50 2.50
Risk Coordinator 21 0.00 1.00 0.50 .5 Moved to Risk Admin
Deputy Risk Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I 18 0.50 0.50 0.00
Subtotal of Gov Immunity Fund 9.00 10.00 9.00
CITY ATTORNEY TOTAL 69.30 73.30 79.30
General Fund 57.50 60.50 66.50
Risk Management Fund 2.80 2.80 3.80
Governmental Immunity Fund 9.00 10.00 9.00
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
CAN Admin Office of the Director
CAN Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
CAN Deputy Director 37 2.00 2.00 2.00
Financial & Admin Services Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Manager 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 1 New Position
Policy & Program Manager 29-32 3.00 2.00 2.00
Real Property Manager, Agent, Spec 21-34 4.00 4.00 4.00
CIP Manager, Specialist 25-31 2.00 0.00 0.00
Financial Analyst III 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Business Systems Analyst 28 0.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 0.00 0.00 0.00
CAN Admin Office of Director Total 15.00 12.00 13.00
Building Services
Building Official 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Building Services Manager 32 3.00 3.00 3.00
Business Systems Analyst 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Protection Engineer 29 2.00 2.00 2.00
Economic Dev Business Coordinator 29 2.00 1.00 1.00
Plans Examiner Sr, Chief, I-III 25-29 8.00 8.00 8.00
Building Inspector Sr, I-III 19-29 20.00 20.00 21.00 1 New Position
Civil Enforcement Spvr, Invst, Officer I-III 17-29 16.00 18.00 18.00
Permit Processor Spvr, I-II 14-24 5.00 5.00 5.00
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
281 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Office Facilitator & Technician I-III 15-19 5.00 5.00 5.00
Building Services Total 63.00 64.00 65.00
Housing Stability
Housing Stability Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Housing Stability Deputy Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Policy & Program Manager, Specialist 27-33 5.00 4.00 4.00
Homeless Manager, Coordinator 21-33 3.00 3.00 3.00
Accountant III 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Planner 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Comm Develop Grant Spec, Analyst 26 3.00 5.00 5.00
Housing Rehab Specialist, I-II 23-25 4.00 3.00 3.00
Housing Loan Officer, Administrator 21-25 1.00 2.00 2.00
Office Facilitator I-II 20-22 2.00 2.00 2.00
Housing Stability Total 21.00 22.00 22.00
Planning
Planning Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Planning Deputy Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Planning Manager 33 5.00 6.00 6.00
Planning Supervisor 31 1.00 0.00 0.00
Development Review Planner Sr, I-III 25-30 6.00 6.00 6.00
Planner Senior, Principal, Associate 24-28 24.00 25.00 25.00
Graphic Design Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Secretary 18 2.00 2.00 2.00
Planning Total 41.00 42.00 42.00
Transportation
Transportation Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Transportation Deputy Director 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Transportation Section Manager 33 2.00 2.00 2.00
Transportation Engineer II-VII 29-36 7.00 7.00 7.00
Transit Policy & Program Planner I-IV 25-31 11.00 11.00 11.00
Traffic Control Center Supervisor, I-II 23-26 2.00 2.00 2.00
Traffic Technician Sr, I-II 19-23 4.00 4.00 4.00
Office Facilitator & Technician II 19-22 2.00 2.00 2.00
Transportation Total 30.00 30.00 30.00
Youth & Family
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
282 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Youth & Family Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Youth & Family Associate Director 29 3.00 3.00 3.00
Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Community Programs Manager, Sr 24-26 9.00 13.00 9.00 4 positions moved to Pub Lands
Spec Projects & Events Coordinator 21 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Facilitator & Technician II 15-20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Program Assistant 14 4.00 4.00 4.00
Youth & Family Total 20.00 25.00 21.00
Community & Neighborhoods Total 190.00 195.00 193.00
General Fund 190.00 195.00 193.00
1/4 Cent Sales Tax Transportation Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Economic Development
Economic Development Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Deputy Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Technology & Innovation Strategic Ind Advisor 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Business Development 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst. Director of Business Development 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Manager 29 4.00 3.00 4.00 New Position
ED Project Coordinator 26 3.00 3.00 3.50 New PT position
Executive Manager 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Manager 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Economic Development Total 13.00 13.00 14.50
Arts Council
Arts Council Executive Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arts Council Assistant Director 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arts Council Program Manager 29 1.00 2.00 2.00
Public Art Program Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arts Council Program Coordinator 25 4.00 3.00 3.00
Office Facilitator I 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Arts Council Total 9.00 9.00 9.00
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL 22.00 22.00 23.50
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
283 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Finance Office of the Director
Chief Financial Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director 39 1.00 2.00 2.00
Controller 39 1.00 0.00 0.00
Business Sys Analyst Team Lead 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Sys Analyst II 30 1.00 2.00 4.00 2 New Positions
Financial Analyst II 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Payroll & Accounting Manager 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Business Analyst 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
Grant Manager 29 1.00 0.00 0.00
City Payroll Administrator 26 2.00 0.00 0.00
Grants Acq/Project Coordinator 25 2.00 0.00 0.00
Sr Payroll Specialist 23 1.00 0.00 0.00
Payroll Kronos Specialist 22 1.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
City A/P Coordinator 20 2.00 0.00 0.00
Finance Office of the Director Total 17.00 8.00 10.00
Finance Accounting Reporting
Accounting
Controller 39 0.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Controller 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager (RDA)33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 2.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV (RDA)32 1.00 0.00 0.00
Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst II 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Staffing/Position Control Specialist 22 1.00 0.00 0.00
Property Control Agent 22 1.00 0.00 1.00 Moved from Cap Asset Planning
City A/P Coordinator 20 0.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst II 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Acct Payable Clerk
Accounts Payable Clerk 18 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Bus Sys Analyst II
Payroll
Payroll & Accounting Manager 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
City Payroll Administrator 26 0.00 2.00 2.00
Sr Payroll Specialist 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Payroll Kronos Specialist 22 0.00 1.00 1.00
Finance Accounting Reporting Total 6.00 13.00 14.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
284 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Finance Internal Audit
Director Int Audit & Fin Analysis 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Auditor I 22 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Sr Fin Analyst Auditor
Auditor II 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Sr Fin Analyst Auditor
Auditor III 30 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Sr Fin Analyst Auditor
Sr Financial Analyst Auditor 32 4.00 3.00 0.00 Changed to Auditor I, II and III
Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Internal Audit & Financial Analysis Total 6.00 4.00 4.00
Finance Revenue
Collections
Director Revenue & Collections 36 1.00 0.00 0.00
Director of Revenue Operations 35 0.00 1.00 1.00
Collections Manager 30 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lead Collections Officer 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Fin Program Super
Collections Officer 20 4.00 3.00 3.00
Lead Hearing Officer Referee Coord.19 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Fin Program Super
Hearing Officer Referee Coord II 18 0.00 2.00 2.00
Finance Program Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from Lead Hearing Officer and Lead Collector
Licensing
City Licensing Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business License Liaison 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Landlord/Tenant License Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Fin Program Super
Business License Officer 17 3.00 3.00 4.00 Changed from BL Processor II
Good Landlord Manager 16 1.00 0.00 0.00
Business License Processor II 16 3.00 4.00 3.00 Changed to BL Officer
Business License Processor I 14 1.00 0.00 0.00
Finance Program Supervisor 24 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Landlord License Super
Analytics
Financial Analytics Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 2.00 2.00 1.00
Financial Analyst III 29 1.00 0.00 3.00 Changed from Fin Analyst III, IV
Financial Analyst II 25 0.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Fin Analyst III
Financial Analyst I 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Finance Revenue Total 21.00 23.00 23.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
285 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Finance Grants Administration
Grant Manager 31 0.00 1.00 1.00
Grants Acq/Project Coordinator 25 0.00 2.00 0.00 Changed two from Grant Acq Coord and 1 from PT to Full Time
Management and Grants Analyst 29 0.00 0.00 3.00 Changed from Grants Acq Coordinator
Lead Hearing Officer Referee Coord.19 1.00 0.00 0.00
Hearing Officer Referee Coord II 18 2.00 0.00 0.00
Finance Grants Administration Total 3.00 3.00 4.00
Finance Purchasing
Chief Procurement Officer 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief Procurement Officer 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Contracts Administrator 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Procurement Manager 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Purchasing Consultant 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Sr Contract Development Specialist 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Contract Dev Spec
Procurement Specialist II 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Procurement Specialist I 24 2.00 1.00 4.00 Changed from Contract Dev Spec
Contract Development Specialist 26 3.00 5.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Contracts Process Coordinator 17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finance Purchasing Total 11.00 13.00 13.00
Finance Treasurer
City Treasurer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Treasurer 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cash & Investment Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Fin Analyst III
Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 0.00 2.00 Changed from Fin Analyst IV
Cashier Administrator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst I 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
City Payment Processor 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Finance Treasurer's Office Total 9.00 9.00 9.00
Finance Policy, Budget and Capital Planning
Policy & Budget
City Budget Director 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Budget & Policy Analyst 32 1.00 2.00 2.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
286 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Policy & Budget Analyst
Policy & Budget Analyst 29 1.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Fin Analyst IV
Capital Asset Planning
Capital Asset Planning Manager 35 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
CIP Impact Fee Manager 30 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Fin Analyst IV
Capital Improvement Program Specialist 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 Funded by Impact Fees following State Statute.
Property Control Agent 22 0.00 1.00 0.00 Moved to Finance Accounting
Finance Budget & Policy Total 4.00 9.00 8.00
FINANCE 77.00 82.00 85.00
General Fund 76.70 81.70 84.70
Risk Fund 0.30 0.30 0.30
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Office of the Fire Chief
Fire Chief 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief 37 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Assistant Fire Chief
Assistant Fire Chief 35 2.00 2.00 3.00 1 Changed from Deputy Chief
Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager I-III 33-35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I-IV 18-27 3.00 3.00 0.00 3 Changed to Financial Analyst I-IV
Financial Analyst I-IV 22-32 0.00 0.00 3.00 3 Changed from Accountant I-IV
Office of the Fire Chief Total 9.00 9.00 9.00
Operations
Battalion Chief 33 6.00 6.00 6.00
Captain 30 65.00 66.00 66.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 228.00 232.00 232.00
Fire Fighter Unfunded 22-27 10.00 10.00 10.00
Operations Total 309.00 314.00 314.00
Fire Administrative Services
Battalion Chief 33 7.00 7.00 7.00
Captain 30 14.00 15.00 15.00
Enterprise Tech Solutions Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Changed from 35 to 36
FIRE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
287 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Social Work Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Emergency Management Public Information Officer/JIC Manager 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Health Care Paramedic 24 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Changed to Fire Fighter
Public Education Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst I-II 24 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 Changed from Senior Communication Tech
Emergency Mgt Training Program Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Preparedness Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Fighter 22-27 29.00 29.00 27.00
2 Changed from Community Health Care Paramedic4 Changed to Medical Response Paramedic
Medical Response Paramedic 22-27 0.00 0.00 8.00 4 Changed from Fire Fighter4 New positions
Social Worker 21-26 2.00 6.00 6.00
Recruiting/Outreach Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Communication Tech 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Business Systems Analyst I-II
Fire Logistics Coordinator 19 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Facilitator II 19 4.00 4.00 4.00
Emergency Mgt Critical Infrastructure Liaison 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Prevention Specialist 17 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Technician I 12 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Administrative Services Total 74.00 79.00 83.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 392.00 402.00 406.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Human Resource Administrative Support
Chief Human Resource Officer 41 0.80 0.80 0.80
Deputy Chief Human Resource Officer 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Civilian Review Board Investigator 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Recruiting & Onboarding Mgr 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.80 0.80 0.80
Human Resources Supervisor - Recruitment 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
HRIS Business Analyst 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Compensation and Classification Analyst 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Leave Specialist 29 0.80 0.80 0.80
Senior HR Recruiter 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Employee Marketing & Communications 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
288 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
HR Office Administrator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Benefits Analyst 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Benefits Analyst 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
HR Business Partner I 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
HR Recruiter 25 3.00 3.00 3.00
Project and Policy Manager 24 0.00 1.00 1.00
HR Admin & Onboarding Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Associate HR Recruiter 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior HR Technician 19 4.00 4.00 4.00
Administrative Support Total 20.40 22.40 22.40
Departmental Consultants
Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 0.00 0.00 0.00
Employee Relations/EEO Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Employee Relations Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resource Business Partner II 29 7.00 7.00 7.00
Departmental Consultants Total 9.00 9.00 9.00
Training
Education Program Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Learning and Development Specialist 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Training & Development Coordinator 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Management Total 2.00 2.00 2.00
Benefits
Chief Human Resource Officer 41 0.20 0.20 0.20
Human Resource Deputy Director 37 0.00 0.00 0.00
Human Resource Program Mgr II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
HRIS Business Analyst 30 0.20 0.20 0.20
Human Resources Supervisor - Benefits 30 2.00 2.00 2.00
Human Resource Leave Specialist 30 1.20 1.20 1.20
Human Resource Business Partner II 29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Employee Marketing & Communications 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Benefits Analyst 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Benefits Analyst 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Benefits Total 4.60 4.60 4.60
Human Resources Total 36.00 38.00 38.00
General Fund 31.40 33.40 33.40
Risk Fund 4.60 4.60 4.60
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
289 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Department Leadership and Administration
Chief Information Officer 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Innovations Consultant 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
IMS Deputy Director 39 1.00 2.00 2.00
Department Leadership and Administration Totals 2.00 4.00 4.00
Office of the CIO
Privacy Officer 34 0.00 0.00 1.00 New Position
Financial Manager I 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst II-III 24-29 2.00 2.00 2.00
Office Facilitator I-III 18-22 0.00 1.00 1.00
Asset Management Administrator 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Inventory Control Specialist 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Purchasing and Administration Totals 3.00 4.00 5.00
Infrastructure Technology Services (ITS)
Chief Information Security Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Enterprise Tech Solutions Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cybersecurity Engineer I-III 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Network Engineering Team Manager 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
IT Systems Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Systems Engineer I-III 27-33 14.00 14.00 14.00
INF Technology Support Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Network Support Administrator I - III 23-27 12.00 13.00 13.00
Infrastructure Technology Services Totals 32.00 34.00 34.00
Geographical Information Systems
Chief Data Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
GIS Programmer Analyst 30 2.00 2.00 2.00
Geo Info Systems (GIS) Coord 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Data/Info Specialist 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Geographical Information Systems Totals 4.00 5.00 5.00
Software Services
Chief Technology Officer 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Director 38 0.00 1.00 1.00
Software Engineer Team Manager 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Software Engineer Team Lead 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
290 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Software Engineering Data Admin 36 3.00 3.00 3.00
Sr Software Engineer 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Software Lead 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Geo Info Systems (GIS) Coord 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Software Engineer I-III 27-33 5.00 5.00 5.00
Software Support Admin I-III 28-32 16.00 16.00 16.00
Tech Solution Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Software Support Totals 31.00 32.00 32.00
Media and Engagement Services
Video Production Manager 3 1.00 1.00 1.00
Multimedia Production Spec I-III 23-31 4.00 4.00 4.00
Social Media Specialist 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Specialist 34 0.00 1.00 1.00
Civic Engagement Program Specialist 24 5.00 5.00 5.00
Multimedia Production Services Totals 10.00 12.00 12.00
Enterprise Project Management
Technology Solution Team Lead 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
INF Tech Project Manager 35 1.00 0.00 0.00
Software Lead 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Solution Management Totals 4.00 3.00 3.00
Innovations Team
Chief Innovations Officer 36 1.00 0.00 0.00
INF Tech Project Manager 35 0.00 1.00 1.00
Innovations Team Lead 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Innovations Consultant 30 2.00 2.00 2.00
Civic Engagement Specialist 24 2.00 2.00 2.00
Solution Management Totals 6.00 6.00 6.00
INFORMATION MGMT SVCS TOTALS (IMS FUND)92.00 100.00 101.00
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
291 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Justice Court
Justice Court Judge 37 5.00 5.00 5.00
City Courts Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager I 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Justice Court Manager 28 2.00 2.00 2.00
Justice Court Supervisor 26 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accountant II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst I 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Justice Court Lead Judicial Assistant 19 1.00 1.00 2.00 1 New position
City Payment Processor 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant III 17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant II 16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant I 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Justice Court Judicial Assistant I-II-III 15-17 25.00 25.00 25.00
Justice Court Total 42.00 42.00 43.00
JUSTICE COURT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Office of the Police Chief
Chief of Police 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Chief 39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Communications Administrative Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Internal Affairs Administrative Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mental Health Professional 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Data Science and Research Administrator 34 1.00 0.00 0.00
Lieutenant--Police 32 2.00 2.00 2.00
Financial & Admin Services Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sergeant Police 29 4.00 5.00 5.00
Police Public Relations Director 29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grant Acquis & Proj Fin Analyst 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Assistant Appointed 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Graphic Design Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I-III 21-27 4.00 4.00 4.00
Police Services Coordinator 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Officer 19-25 7.00 8.00 8.00
Administrative Secretary I-II 18-21 1.00 1.00 1.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
292 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Tech I-II 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office of the Police Chief Total 30.00 31.00 31.00
Administrative Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Captain--Police 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lieutenant--Police 32 2.00 2.00 2.00
Emergency Mgt Program Director 31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sergeant--Police 29 5.00 5.00 5.00
Crime Lab/Evidence Room Director 29-30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Forensic Scientist Lab Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Quality Assurance Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Stats & Analysis Director 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Records Director 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Victim Advocate Program Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Outreach Program Administrator 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Public Safety Tech Systems Coordinator 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Lab Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Emergency Management City Wide Training & Exercise Coord 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Forensic Scientist I-II 23-26 6.00 7.00 7.00
Sr Communications Tech 2324 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Police Intel Specialist 23.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Evidence Supervisor 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Community Preparedness Coord.23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grama Coordinator 23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Systems Supervisor 22 5.00 6.00 6.00
Victim Advocate 22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Police Intelligence Specialist 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grama Coordinator/Paralegal 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Officer I-III 19-25 26.00 26.00 26.00
Authorization - Early Hire Police Officer 19-25 20.00 20.00 20.00
Office Facilitator 18-19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fleet Mgt Services Supervisor Coordinator 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Emergency Management Asst Crit Infrastructure Liaison 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crime Lab Technician I-II 16-19 14.00 12.00 12.00
Evidence Technician I-II 16 6.00 6.00 6.00
Sr Police Information Specialist 15 12.00 11.00 11.00
Technical Support Specialist 15 5.00 5.00 5.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
293 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Gang Outreach Coordinator 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Police Information Specialist 13 16.00 15.00 15.00
Office Tech I-II 12-15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative 131.00 129.00 129.00
Field Operations I Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Captain Police 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lieutenant--Police 32 9.00 9.00 9.00
Social Work Director 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sergeant--Police 29 21.00 21.00 21.00
Community Programs Manager 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
LCSW/Mental Health Counselor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Police Officer 19-25 164.00 170.00 170.00
Authorization - Early Hire Police Officer 19-25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Social Work Case Worker 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 1.00 2.00 2.00
Administrative Secretary I 18 1.00 0.00 0.00
Civilian Response Specialist 19 12.00 16.00 16.00
Office Tech I-II 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Field Operations I Bureau 212.00 222.00 222.00
Field Operations II Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 0.00 1.00 1.00
Captain Police 34 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lieutenant--Police 32 8.00 8.00 8.00
Sergeant--Police 29 22.00 22.00 22.00
Police Officer 19-25 166.00 165.00 171.00 6 New positions for Airport
Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 0.00 3.00 3.00
Police Intelligence Specialist 21 0.00 3.00 3.00
Crime Stats & Analysis Director 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crime Stats & Analysis Supervisor 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Data Science and Research Administrator 34 0.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Tech I-II 12-15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Field Operations II Bureau 200.00 208.00 214.00
Investigative Bureau
Deputy Chief--Police 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
294 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Captain Police 34 1.00 2.00 2.00
Lieutenant--Police 32 4.00 4.00 4.00
Social Work Director 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sergeant--Police 29 19.00 19.00 19.00
Victim Advocate Director 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Social Work Manager 26 3.00 3.00 3.00
Victim Advocate Program Coordinator 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
LCSW/Mental Health Counselor 24 6.00 6.00 6.00
Community Programs Manager 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Crime Stats & Analysis Director 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Sr Police Intel Specialist 23 3.00 0.00 0.00
Victim Advocate 22 3.00 3.00 3.00
Police Intelligence Specialist 21 3.00 0.00 0.00
Police Officer 19-25 112.00 112.00 112.00
Social Work Case Worker 19 9.00 9.00 9.00
Office Facilitator I-II 18-19 2.00 3.00 3.00
Youth Specialists 15 4.00 4.00 4.00
Office Tech I-II 12-15 1.00 0.00 0.00
Investigative Bureau 177.00 171.00 171.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT TOTAL 750.00 761.00 767.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Public Lands Administration
Parks & Public Lands Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Lands Deputy Director 38 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director Public Lands 38 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from TNL Division
Finance Manager II 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.35 0.35 0.35
Communications & EngagementManager 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Comm/Events & Marketing Mgr (29)
Financial Analyst III 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Comm/Events & Marketing Mgr 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Communications &Engagement Manager (32)
PPL Project Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00
PPL Landscape Planner 28 0.00 0.00 0.00
PPL Asset Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Manager 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 19 to 26
Communications Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Community & Building Partnership Coordinator
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
295 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Community & Building Partnership Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Communications Coordinator
Public Lands Event Manager 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Special Events Permit Manager 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Civic Engagement Program Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Asst 21 0.00 1.00 1.00
Special Event Permit Coordinator 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Specialist 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.50 0.50
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 2.00 Transferred from Parks Division
Public Lands Administration Total 15.35 17.85 19.85
Parks Division
Parks Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 2.00 1.85 1.85
City Sexton 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Regional Athletic Complex Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Supervisor 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parks & Public Lands Project Coord 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 (1) New Position FY25 Budget
District Supervisor 25 9.00 9.00 9.00
Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Electrician IV 22 1.00 2.00 2.00
Metal Fabrication Tech 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Events Coordinator 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Plumber II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
General Maintenance Worker III 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parks Usage Coordinator 21 1.00 0.00 0.00
Central Control Irrigation Specialist 20 2.00 3.00 3.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Florist 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Trails & Natural Lands Director (35), Transferred to TNL Division
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech II 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cemetery Equipment Operators 17 4.00 4.00 4.00
Graffiti Response Field Tech 16 6.00 6.00 6.00
Parks Maintenance Tech I-II-III 13-19 22.00 33.00 34.00 (1) New Position FY25 Budget
General Maintenance Worker I-III 16-20 5.00 6.00 6.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech I-III 16-20 8.00 9.00 9.00
Office Tech II 15 3.00 3.00 2.00 Transferred to Admin Division
Parks Groundskeeper 12 10.00 0.00 0.00
Parks Total 81.00 84.85 84.85
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
296 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Planning & Design Division (New Division created byFY24 ordinance change separated from TNL)
Planning & Design Division Director 35 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from PlanningManager (33), Transferred from TNL Division
Senior Landscape Architect 34 0.00 0.00 2.00 (1) Transferred from Engineering Div/Public Svcs Dept, FY24 BA#2. (1) New Position FY25 Budget
Senior Public Lands Planner 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 (1) New Position FY25 Budget
Landscape Architect III 30 0.00 0.00 3.00 (3) Transferred from Engineering Div/Public Svcs Dept, FY24 BA#2,
Public Lands Planner 28 0.00 0.00 4.00 Changed from PPL Landscape Planner, Transferred from TNL Division
Planning and Design Total 0.00 0.00 11.00
Trails and Natural Lands Division
Deputy Director Public Lands 38 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Admin Division
Trails & Natural Lands Division Director 35 0.00 1.00 Changed from Senior Florist (18), Transferred from Parks Division
Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.15 1.15
Planning Manager 33 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Planning & Design Division Director (35), Transferred from TNL Division
PPL Landscape Planner 28 2.00 4.00 0.00 Changed to Public Lands Planner, Transferred from TNL Division
Recreation Trails Project Manager 28 1.00 1.00 1.00
Park Ranger Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Environmental Specialist 26 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Restoration Ecologist (22)
Natural Lands Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Stewardship and Education Coordinator 22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Restoration Ecologist 22 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Environmental Specialist (26)
Park Ranger Leads 21 4.00 4.00 4.00
Park Ranger 19 14.00 14.00 14.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Natural Resource Technician 16 2.00 7.00 7.00
Senior Parks Groundskeeper 16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Trails and Natural Lands Total 29.00 37.15 32.15
Urban Forestry Division
Urban Forestry Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Urban Forestry Operations Manager 28 4.00 1.00 1.00
Urban Forestry Services Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
297 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Urban Forestry Field Supervisor 24 0.00 2.00 2.00
Forest Area Service Coordinator 22 4.00 3.00 3.00
Arborist Crew Foreman 21 1.00 4.00 4.00
Arborist II 19 5.00 4.00 4.00
Arborist I 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Tech 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Urban Forestry Total 18.00 18.00 18.00
Golf Division
Golf Program - Golf Fund
Golf Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Director 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.65 0.65 0.65
Golf Professional III 30 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Golf Professional I (23)
Golf Course Super 27 to 36 holes 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Golf Course Super 18 holes 27 3.00 3.00 3.00
Golf Professional II 28 2.00 2.00 2.00
Golf Superintendent 9 Hole 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Golf Professional I 23 3.00 3.00 2.00 Changed to Golf Professional III (30)
Player Development and Programs Mgr 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Golf Club Professional 20 4.00 4.00 4.00
Assistant Golf Course Super 20 12.00 12.00 12.00
Senior Warehouse Operator 15 0.00 0.50 0.50
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Golf Subtotal for Golf Fund 33.65 34.15 34.15
Golf Division Total 33.65 34.15 34.15
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT TOTAL 177.00 192.00 200.00
General Fund 143.35 157.85 165.85
Golf Fund 33.65 34.15 34.15
PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Administrative Services
Public Services Department Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Admin Services Deputy Director 38 0.00 0.00 0.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
298 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Deputy Director, Public Services 38 2.00 2.00 2.00
Safety and Security Director 37 0.00 1.00 1.00
Enterprise Tech Solutions Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from E35 to E36
Financial Manager 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications and Administration Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst Team Lead 33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Capital Asset Manager 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from CARES Policy + Program Manager
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 0.00 0.00
Safety Program Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from E31 to E33
Data Analyst & Tech Support 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Business Systems Analyst I
Facilities Building Admin 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Facilities.
Safety Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from E24 to E26.
Financial Analyst II 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Management Analyst 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from E24 to E26.
Financial Analyst I-IV 21-32 5.00 5.00 5.00
Public Outreach and Information Liaison 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office of Director Total 18.00 19.00 20.00
Engineering
City Engineer 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy City Engineer 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer VII 36 2.00 2.00 2.00
City Architect 37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from E36 to E37
Senior Project Manager 34 1.00 2.00 5.00 2 New positions, 1.0 Transferred from Facilities
Engineer VI 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer V 33 3.00 4.00 1.00
1.0 Changed to Engineering Construction Program Project Manager (E29); 1.0 Changed to Civil Engineer V (E33); 1.0 Changed to Environmental Engineer V (E33)
Civil Engineer V 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Engineer V
Environmental Engineer V 33 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Engineer V
GIS Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Architect 35 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed from E33 to E35.Changed to Licensed Architect
Senior Landscape Architect 33 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Licensed Architect
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
299 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Engineer IV 31 6.00 6.00 4.00
1 New Position, 1.0 Changed to Engineering Tech VI (E27); 1.0 Changed to Eng I (26); 1.0 Changed to Eng II (E27)
GIS Systems Coordinator 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Eng GIS/Asset Management Specialist (E26)
Licensed Architect 32 1.00 1.00 2.00 Changed from Sr Architect
City Surveyor 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer III 29 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 Transferred to Streets Div; 1.0 Changed from Eng II(E27)
Landscape Architect III 29 3.00 3.00 0.00
2.0 Transferred to Public Lands Department; 1.0 Changed to Associate Landscape Architect II (E26); Transferred to Public Lands
Engineering Const Program Project Manager 29 3.00 3.00 4.00 Changed one from Engineer V (33)
Facilities Commissioning Authority 29 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Facilities Division; changed from E30
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 Changed to Business Systems Analyst II (E30)
Engineer II 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Contracts Administrator 0 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Engineering Procurements & Contracts Spec (E25)
Engineer I 0 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Engineer IV (E31)
Engineering Technician VI 27 3.00 3.00 4.00 Changed from Engineering Tech IV
Professional Land Surveyor 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering GIS/Asset Management Specialist 26 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.0 Changed from GIS Systems Coordinator (E30)
Engineering Procurement & Contracts Specialist 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Engineering Contracts Administrator (E27)
GIS Specialist 24 2.00 2.00 2.00
Civic Engagement Program Spec 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech V 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech IV 23 4.00 4.00 3.00 Changed to Engineering Technician VI
GIS Tech II 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Tech III 31 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Eng Info/Records Tech
Engineering Information and Records Specialist 20 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed to Eng Tech III
Special Projects Assistant 21 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed from Office Facilitator (N19)
Office Facilitator II 22 2.00 2.00 1.00 Changed from N19 to N22
Engineering Total 49.00 51.00 51.00
Compliance Division
Compliance Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Compliance Div Field Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.0 Changed from Compliance Swing-Shift Field Sup (N25)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
300 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Compliance Swing-Shift Field Supervisor 25 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.0 Changed to Compliance Div Field Supervisor (N27)
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Pay Station Tech 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lead Compliance Enforcement Officer 21 3.00 5.00 5.00 Changed from 120 to 121
Crossing Guard Program & Outreach Coordinator 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from N19 to N20
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Enforcement Officer 19 16.00 16.00 16.00 Changed from 118 to 199
Office Tech II 19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed form 215 to 219
Crossing Guard Coordinator 13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Tech I 16 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed from 212 to 216
Compliance Total 29.00 32.00 32.00
Facilities Services Division
Building Maintenance Program
Facilities Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Project Manager 34 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Engineering.
Construction Operations Manager 32 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Operations Manager.
Operations Manager 31 2.00 2.00 1.00 Changed one to Construction Operations Manager.
Energy/Utilities Management Coordinator 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to PG 27
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to PG30
Facilities Commissioning Authority 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Transferred to Engineering Division
Facility Maintenance Supervisor 29 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.0 Changed to Operations Supervisor (27)
Business Systems Analyst I 28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 2.00 5.00 2.0 Changed from Facility Maintenance Supervisor (29)1.0 Changed from Plumber III (22)
District Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Electrician IV 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from I24 to I25
Plumber III 22 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Operations Supervisor (27)
Lead HVAC Technician 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from 124 to 125
Clean-Up Equipment Operator III 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 New position
HVAC Technician II 24 2.00 2.00 1.00 Changed to HVAC Technician I
Lead Bldg Maintenance Tech 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
HVAC Technician I 22 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 Changed from HVAC Technician II (21)
Plumber II 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III
Maintenance Specialist III 23 0.00 0.00 6.00 6.0 Changed from Maint Spec I (117)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
301 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Carpenter II 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from Maintenance Specialist III
Painter II 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from 120
Clean-Up Equipment Operator II 16 0.00 0.00 2.00 New positions
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech III 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Plumber II (21)
Gen Maint Worker IV 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Facilitator II 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Specialist II 20 0.00 0.00 11.00 11.0 Changed from Maint Spec I (117)
Building Equipment Operator II 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Maintenance Worker III 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Building Equipment Operator I 17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Maintenance Specialist I-III 17-21 17.00 21.00 0.00
11.0 Changed to Maint Spec II (120)6.0 Changed to Maint Spec III (123)4.0 Changed to Trades Apprentice Specialist (117)
Equipment Operator 17 2.00 2.00 2.00
Trades Apprentice Specialist 17 0.00 0.00 4.00 Changed from Maint Spec I
General Maintenance Worker III 16 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Maintenance Worker I 16 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Facilities Landscaper 16 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sprinkler Irrigation Tech 16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Office Technician II 15 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Facilities Support Coordinator
Facilities Support Coordinator 26 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.0 Changed from Office Technician II
Beautification Maintenance Worker II 13 0.00 0.00 4.00 Changed from Beaut Worker I-II
Beautification Maintenance Worker I-II 12-13 7.00 7.00 3.00 Changed to Beaut Worker II
Facilities Services Total 52.00 57.00 58.00
Fleet Management Division
Fleet Mgmt Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst I 28 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Asset Manager 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fleet Mgmt Service Supervisor 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Fleet Senior Mechanic 28 3.00 3.00 3.00 Changed from 127
Fleet Warehouse Super 24 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Warehouse Manager (PG27)
Warehouse Manager 27 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Fleet Warehouse Super24
Fleet Metal Fabrication Tech 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from 124
Fleet Customer Service Advisor Lead 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from (21 to 23)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
302 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Fleet Customer Service Advisor 21 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.0 Changed from (PG19)
Fleet Mechanic 24 25.00 25.00 29.00 Changed from Fleet Trainee; 3 new FTEs added in BA4
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 Changed from Fleet Trainee (PG17)
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Special Projects Assistant (PG 21)
Fleet Mechanic Trainee 17 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Fleet Mechanic (PG124)
Fleet Senior Warehouse Operator 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed from 19
Fleet Parts Warehouse Support Worker 18 3.00 3.00 3.00 Changed from 17
Fleet Parts Delivery Driver 11 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Management Total (FLEET FUND)46.00 46.00 49.00
Streets Division
Streets Division Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 3.00 3.00 3.00
Business Systems Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer III 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Supervisor 27 2.00 2.00 6.00 4.0 Changed from Maintenance Supervisor (25)
Streets Operations Maintenance Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Streets Response Team Field Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Supervisor 25 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.0 Changed to Operations Supervisor (N27)
Traffic Signal Lead 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Traffic Signal Tech II 23 4.00 4.00 1.00
Response Team Leader 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Streets Maintenance Lead 24 6.00 6.00 10.00 4.0 Changed from Asphalt Equipment Operator II (119)
Traffic Maintenance Lead 24 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed from 23
Traffic Signal Tech I 21 1.00 1.00 6.00 3.0 Changed from Traffic Signal Tech II (323), 2 converted PT to FT
GIS Technician I 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Concrete Finisher 22 10.00 10.00 10.00 Changed from 121
Senior Asphalt Equipment Oper 22 12.00 11.00 12.00
1.0 Changed to Fleet Maintenance Coordinator (125) 1.0 Changed from Lead Equipment Operator (20)
Lead Equipment Operator 20 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Changed to Senior Asphalt Equipment Operator (122)
Office Facilitator II 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Changed to 122
Streets Response Team Member II 19 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 Changed to Streets Response Team Member I (118)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
303 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Asphalt Equipment Oper II 19 37.00 37.00 29.00
3.00 Changed to Asphalt Equipment Operator I (115) 4.0 Changed to Streets Maintenance Lead (124)
Concrete Saw & Grinder Oper 19 2.00 2.00 2.00 Changed to 119
Streets Response Team Member I 18 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 Changed from Streets Response Team Member II (19)
Traffic Maintenance Operator II 19 11.00 11.00 9.00 2.00 Changed to Traffic Maintenance Operator I (115)
Communication and GIS Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Streets Equipment Operator II 19 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Changed from Equipment Operator (17)
Asphalt Equipment Oper I 15 1.00 1.00 4.00 3.0 Changed from Asphalt Equipment Operator II (119)
Traffic Maintenance Operator I 15 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 Changed from Traffic Maintenance Operator II (119)
Office Tech II 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 New position converted PT to FT
Fleet Maintenance Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 Changed from Senior Asphalt Equipment Operator (20)
Streets Total 114.00 114.00 116.00
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT TOTAL 308.00 319.00 326.00
General Fund 262.00 273.00 277.00
Fleet Management Fund 46.00 46.00 49.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Administration
Director--Public Utilities 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director-Public Utilities 39 2.00 2.00 2.00
Executive Assistant 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 24 to 26
Public Utilities Policy & Public Affairs Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
GIS Info Tech Systems Admin 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Mgr 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Safety Program Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Utilities Water Rights, Contracts and Property Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 31, Transferred from Water Resources
PU Communications Engagement Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
GIS Programmer Analyst II 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
PU Surveyor 33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 33
GIS Programmer Analyst I 28 3.00 3.00 4.00 1 Changed from GIS Specialist (24)
Engineering Tech VI 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
304 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Water Rights & Property Agent 27 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 Transferred from Water Resources; Grade changed from 26 to 27
Safety Coordinator 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
Talent Management Coordinator 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Utility Planner & Development Coordinator 25 1.00 2.00 2.00
Locator Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Relations Coordinator 25 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Communications Specialist (27)
GIS Specialist 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Changed from GIS Technician I (21); 1 Changed to GIS Programmer Analyst I (28)
Safety Inspector 24 1.00 2.00 2.00
PU Records Prog Specialist 23 0.00 0.00 1.00 Transferred from Water Resources
GIS Leak Detection Tech II 23 2.00 2.00 2.00
Communications Specialist 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Public Relations Coordinator (25)
GIS Technician I 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to GIS Specialist (24)
Mobile Inventory Specialist & Technician 21 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Office Technician II (219)
Records Technician 21 0.00 0.00 2.00 2 Changed from Office Facilitator II (19)
Util Dev Review Specialist 19 4.00 4.00 4.00
Senior Utility Locator 19 8.00 8.00 9.00 1 Changed from Utility Locator (17)
Office Facilitator II 19 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Changed to Records Technicians (221)
Office Technician II 19 0.00 0.00 1.00 Changed from Mobile Inventory Specialist & Technician (21)
Utility Locator 17 0.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Senior Utility Locator (19)
Administration Total 39.00 45.00 48.00
Maintenance
Operations Maint Superintendent 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Distribution System Mgr 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
Computer Operation Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maint Support Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Maintenance Manager 33 0.00 1.00 1.00
Storm Water Maint Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
WW Collection Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Irrigation Canal Systems Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water System Maintenance Super 27 4.00 4.00 4.00
Water System Operation Super 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
305 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Electrical Operations Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Manager 27 0.00 1.00 1.00
Technical System Analyst III-IV 26-28 3.00 3.00 3.00
Water Service Coordinator 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste Water Collection Supervisor 26 2.00 2.00 2.00
Lift Station Maintenance Supervisor 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Storm Water Maintenance Supervisor 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Water Meter Maintenance Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Office Supervisor 25 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Water Meter Tech 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 21 to 125
Fleet Maint Coord Public Util 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed to 323 from 21
Office Facilitator II 22 1.00 Changed from Office Facilitator I (18)
Office Facilitator I 18 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Office Facilitator II (22)
Warehouse Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sr Warehouse Operator 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Warehouse Office Tech II 15 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr. Utilities Rep. Office/Technical 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Sr. Communications Coordinator-Public Util 15 6.00 6.00 6.00
Industrial Electrician IV 26 6.00 6.00 6.00
Metal Fabrication Technician 22 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Water Dist System Operator 21 16.00 16.00 16.00
Senior Water System Maint Operator 21 16.00 16.00 16.00
Waste Water Collection Lead Maint Worker 21 6.00 6.00 6.00
WW Lift Station Lead Worker 21 4.00 4.00 4.00
Drainage Maintenance Lead Worker 21 3.00 3.00 3.00
General Maintenance Worker III 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 21 to 123
Senior Pumps Maint Tech 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Concrete Finisher 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 20 to 122
Senior Irrigation Operator 22 4.00 4.00 4.00 Grade changed from 20 to 122
Waste Water Lift Station Lead Wkr 20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water System Maintenance Operator I-II 17-19 27.00 27.00 27.00
Water Meter Tech I-III 18-19 6.00 6.00 6.00
Waste Water Coll Maint Worker II 19 12.00 12.00 12.00
Drainage Maintenance Worker III 19 9.00 11.00 11.00
Pumps Maintenance Technician 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Facility/Building Maint Wkr 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fleet Maintenance Coordinator 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Waste Water Lift Station Maint Wkr 18 4.00 4.00 4.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
306 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Irrigation Operator II 17 4.00 4.00 4.00
Landscape Restoration Lead Wkr 17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Landscaper 16 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facility/Building Maintenance Wkr 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Water Distribution Valve Operator 15 8.00 8.00 8.00
Water Maintenance Support Wkr 14 2.00 2.00 2.00
Custodian II 11 2.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Total 180.00 184.00 184.00
Water Reclamation Plant
Water Reclamation Manager 36 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Facility Operations Manager 33 1.00 Changed from WRF Operations & Maint Manager (33)
WRF Operations & Maint Manager 33 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Water Reclamation Facility Operations Manager (33)
Regulatory Compliance Manager 34 1.00 1.00 1.00
WRF Maintenance Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Laboratory Program Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Industrial Pretreatment Program Coordinator 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 29 to 30
Maintenance Project Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste Water Business Manager 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
W.W. Plant Maintenance Coordinator 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 27 to 28
Water Reclamation Facility Process Control Analyst 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Employee Development Manager 26 1.00 Changed from WRF Office Administrator (21)
WRF Office Administrator 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Employee Development Manager (26)
Safety Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
WRF Operations Supervisor 27 4.00 4.00 4.00
Water Reclamation Facility Lead Operator 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fats, Oils & Grease Program Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Planner Scheduler 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Instrumentation and Controls Technician II-IV 25-28 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Laboratory Chemist 30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Industrial WW Pretreat Program Sr Permit Writer 26 6.00
2 Changed from Senior Industrial WW Pretreat Program (25); 4 Changed from Pretreatment Inspect/Permit Writer (23)
Senior Industrial WW Pretreat Program 25 2.00 2.00 0.00 Changed to Industrial WW Pretreat Program Sr Permit Writer (26)
Lab Chemist 26 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade changed from 24 to 326
Warehouse Supervisor 24 1.00 1 Changed from Sr. Warehouse Operator (15)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
307 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Water Reclamation Facility Operator IV 26 4.00 4.00 4.00 Grade changed from 23 to 126
Pretreatment Inspect/Permit Writer 23 4.00 4.00 0.00 4 Changed to Industrial WW Pretreat Program Sr Permit Writer (26)
Pretreatment Sr Sampler Inspect 19 2.00 4.00 0.00 4 Changed to Industrial WW Pretreat Program Sr Sampler (26)
Office Facilitator II Non Union 20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Industrial WW Pretreat Program Sr Sampler 26 4.00 Changed from Pretreatment Sr Sampler Inspect (19)
Senior Warehouse Operator 20 2.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to Warehouse Supervisor (26); Grade changed from 15 to 220
Sr Utilities Representative- Office /Technical 15 2.00 2.00 2.00
Industrial Electrician IV 26 2.00 2.00 2.00
HVAC Technician II 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 21 to 125
Waste Water Plant Maint. Operator IV 25 8.00 8.00 8.00 Grade changed from 21 to 125
Water Reclamation Facility Operator III 25 17.00 17.00 17.00 Grades 120 - 125
Painter II 20 0.00 0.00 0.00
CMMS/Utilities Administrator 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Reclamation Plant Total 69.00 71.00 71.00
Finance
Finance Administrator 39 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Finance Administrator 37 1.00 Changed from Financial Analyst IV (32)
Financial Manager III 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Analyst IV 32 3.00 4.00 3.00 1 Changed to Deputy Finance Administrator (37)
Utility Revenue Operations Manager 31 1.00 Changed from Water Metering Technologies Manager (27)
Customer Service Manager Public Utilities 29 1.00 1.00 0.00 Change to Customer Service Accts/Coll Invest (23)
Accountant IV 29 1.00 2.00 2.00
Financial Analyst III 30 3.00 2.00 2.00
Water Metering Technologies Manager 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Utility Revenue Operations Manager (31)
Accountant III 27 1.00 0.00 0.00
Water Metering Technologies Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 25 to 27
Billing Office Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 25 to 27
Customer Services Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 25 to 27
Customer Service Accts/Coll Invest 23 6.00 22.00 23.00 Grade changed from 18 to 223; 1 Changed from Customer Service Manager (29)
Sr. Utilities Rep. - Generalist 15 9.00 0.00 0.00
Sr. Utilities Rep. - Customer Service 15 7.00 0.00 0.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
308 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Senior Advanced Metering Infrastructure 21 0.00 4.00 4.00 Grade changed from 21 to 125
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Tech II 19 7.00 3.00 3.00 Grade changed from 19 to 120
Water Meter Reader III 18 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade changed from 18 to 223
Water Meter Reader II 15 5.00 5.00 5.00 Grade changed from 15 to 114
Finance Total 51.00 51.00 51.00
Water Quality & Treatment
Water Quality & Treatment Administrator 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Treatment Plant Systems Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Treatment Plant Systems Assistant Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
L&C Cross Connection Control Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 31
Regulatory Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 31
Watershed Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 31
Storm Water Quality Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 31
Water Treatment Plant Assistant Manager 30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Lead and Copper X Connection Supervisor 27 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Water Quality Supervisor (E28)
Project Manager 27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Treatment Plant Facility Manager 30 3.00 3.00 3.00
Watershed Operations Supervisor 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 27 to 28
Water Quality Supervisor 28 2.00
1 Changed from Storm Water Compliance Specialist (25); 1 Changed from Lead and Copper X Connection Supervisor (27)
Storm Water Compliance Specialist 25 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Water Quality Supervisor (E28)
Cross Connection Control Manager 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Treatment Plant Lead Oper 26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Watershed Special Projects Coordinator 26 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Quality Coordinator 24 4.00
1 Changed from Cross Connections Control Coord (23); 3 Changed from Storm Water Quality Coord (23)
Storm Water Quality Coordinator 23 3.00 3.00 0.00 3 Changed to Water Quality Coordinator (24)
Cross Connections Control Coord 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Changed to Water Quality Coordinator (24)
Storm Water Technician II Union 22 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Changed to Water Quality Technician (22)
Lead and Copper Technician 21 2.00 2.00 0.00 2 Changed to Water Quality Technician (22)
Water Quality Technician 22 0.00 0.00 5.00
2 Changed from Storm Water Technician Union (22); 2 Changed from Lead and Copper Technician (21); 1 Changed from Cross Connections Control Technician (21)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
309 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Cross Connections Control Technician 21 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 Changed to Water Quality Technician (22)
Quality Assurance Sr Sampler Cl Water 23 2.00 2.00 2.00 Grade changed from 17 to 23
Lead Watershed Ranger 23 4.00 4.00 2.00 2 Changed to Watershed Ranger (20)
Watershed Ranger 20 4.00 4.00 6.00 2 Changed from Lead Watershed Rangers (23)
Water Plant Operator II 24 25.00 25.00 25.00 25 Grade changed from 21 to 24
Water Quality & Treatment Admin Total 58.00 58.00 58.00
Water Resources
Water Resources Manager 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Utilities Water Rights, Contracts and Property Manager 30 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Administration
PU Sustainability Manager 30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 29 to 30
Sustainability Program Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Water Conservation Program Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 30 to 31
Water Resources Eng/Scientist 27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hydrologist I 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 27 to 28
Water Rights & Property Agent 26 1.00 2.00 0.00 2 Transferred to Administration
Property & Water Contracts Asst 20 1.00 0.00 0.00
Hydrology Specialist Union 23 1.00 2.00 2.00
Conservation Technician 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade changed from 26 to 23
PU Records Prog Specialist 23 1.00 1.00 0.00 Transferred to Administration
Water Resources Total 11.00 12.00 8.00
Engineering
Chief Engineer - Public Utilities 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineer III-VII 29-36 23.00 25.00 25.00
Sr Water Treatment Engineer 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Control Specialist 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Construction Program/Projects Manager 29 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Coordinator 29 0.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech II - VI 19-27 19.00 19.00 19.00
Engineering Tech IV- VI 23-27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Tech III-V 21-24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Eng Contracts Coord Public Util 22 2.00 2.00 2.00
Engineering Tech III 21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Tech II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Document Controls Specialist 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Administrative Secretary 18 1.00 1.00 1.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
310 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Engineering Tech I 17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Contracts Process Coordinator 17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Contracts Technician 15 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Total 50.00 53.00 53.00
Street Lighting
Engineer V 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech IV 23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Engineering Tech III 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Engineering Tech I 17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Street Lighting Total 2.00 2.00 2.00
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT TOTAL 460.00 476.00 475.00
Street Lighting Fund 2.72 2.57 2.35
Water Utility Fund 288.16 298.21 295.99
Sewer Utility Fund 127.65 130.80 130.88
Storm Water Utility Fund 40.47 43.42 45.78
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
311 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Waste & Recycling Division Refuse Fund
Waste & Recycling Div Director 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Financial Manager I 33 1.00 1.00 1.00
Waste & Recycling Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Maintenance Program Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Special Projects Analyst and Safety Coordinator 28 1.00 1.00 1.00
W&R Operations Supervisor 27 2.00 2.00 2.00
Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
W & R Permit Coordinator 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
W & R Education & Permits Lead 20 0.00 0.00 0.00
WR Program Lead 20 2.00 2.00 2.00
Waste & Recycling Equip Op II 18 29.00 29.00 29.00
Senior Equipment Operator 19 4.00 4.00 4.00
Lead Equipment Operator 20 3.00 3.00 3.00
Office Facilitator II 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
W & R Education Specialist I-II 16-19 0.00 5.00 5.00
Office Tech II 15 3.00 3.00 3.00
W & R Education Specialist 15 5.00 0.00 0.00
Container Maintenance Worker 14 2.00 3.00 3.00
Waste & Recycling Total 56.00 57.00 57.00
Environ & Energy Division Refuse Fund
Sustainability Envir Director 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sustainability Deputy Director 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sr Energy Climate Program Mgr 35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Sustainability Program Manager 29 3.00 3.00 3.00
Sustainability Community Manager 28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sustainability Community Projects Manager 26 0.00 1.00 1.00
Sustainable Business Prog Coor 24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II 19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Environ & Energy Division Refuse Fund 7.00 8.00 8.00
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT (Refuse Fund) TOTAL 63.00 65.00 65.00
DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
312 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Redevelopment Agency
Director - Redevelopment Agency 41 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency 37 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Project Manager 35 2.00 4.00 5.00 1 New position(s)
Financial Analyst IV 32 0.00 1.00 1.00
Project Manager 33 7.00 4.00 5.00 1 New position(s)
RDA Communications and Outreach Manager 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Communications Coordinator 25 0.00 1.00 1.00
Property Administrator 26 1.00 0.00 0.00
Redevelopment Agency Property Manager 30 0.00 1.00 1.00
Project Coordinator 28 1.00 4.00 2.00 2 Position(s) eliminated
Office Manager 21 2.00 1.00 1.00
Special Projects Assistant 21 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II Non-Union 20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Redevelopment Agency Total 19.00 21.00 21.00
Gallivan Plaza
Plaza & Comm Events Div Director 32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Operations Manager 31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facilities Maintenance Supervisor 25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Gallivan Event Adv/Mktg Manager 25 2.00 2.00 2.00
Plaza Marketing/Activities Supr 23 1.00 0.00 0.00
Event Coordinator II 23 0.00 1.00 1.00
Office Facilitator II Non-Union 22 1.00 1.00 1.00
General Maintenance Worker I 16 5.00 2.00 1.00 1 Changed to General Maintenance Worker II (18)
General Maintenance Worker II 18 0.00 1.00 1.00
1 Changed from General Maintenance Worker II (16), 1 Changed to General Maintenance Worker III (21)
General Maintenance Worker III 21 0.00 2.00 3.00 1 Changed from General Maintenance Worker II (18)
Office Technician I 19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Custodian II 11 1.00 1.00 1.00
Gallivan Plaza Total 13.00 13.00 13.00
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL 32.00 34.00 34.00
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Grades FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 Changes from FY2024 to FY2025
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
313 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Staffing Document
314 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Appendix
This page intentionally left blank
The City Library
Proposed Budget
Fiscal Year 2025
2 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Contents
Another happy patron at the Anderson-Foothill Branch.
Budget Overview
• General Fund Proposed Budget - $36,446,370
• Increase of $3.2M or 9.6%
• Higher due to Capital Projects
• Debt Service Fund Proposed Budget - $986,000
• Capital Project Fund Proposed Budget - $4,194,000
Contents and Budget Overview .........................................2
Letter from the Executive Director .....................................3
Staffing Profiles .............................................................6-7
General Fund Revenues ................................................8-9
General Fund Expenditures .......................................10-12
Debt Service Fund .........................................................13
Capital Project Fund .......................................................14
Branch Locations ...........................................................15
3Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Adam Weinacker
Library Board President
Noah Baskett
Executive Director
It is with pride and gratitude that I present this proposed budget for the Salt Lake City Public Library for fiscal year 2025. Having
stepped into the role of Executive Director in January 2024, I am humbled by the opportunity to further this 125-year-old institution’s
mission alongside a committed team of staff, and the broad trust of our city’s residents.
This budget focuses on strengthening the role that the Library plays in our city as a whole, and the unique and distinct
neighborhoods served by our eight locations.
April 2024
Mayor Mendenhall, City Council Members, and Residents of Salt Lake City,
Our operational priorities are:
• Making progress toward optimal staffing levels across the system – ensuring that we are fully equipped to serve all
patrons with excellence.
• Staff compensation and training – fairly compensating and supporting our staff who serve our residents with deep
commitment and care.
• Increasing the investment in our collection – extending access to books and other materials for our growing number
of residents.
Our capital priorities are:
• Improving our safety and security infrastructure – ensuring all patrons feel safe at the Library.
• Completing ongoing maintenance projects – maintaining our facilities for effective operations.
• Our Library Facilities Plan – building the groundwork for future growth and facilities to better serve city residents.
We created these priorities in alignment with the City’s Four Pillars, and feel as if we are marching in step toward a brighter future for
all of Salt Lake City.
This budget will allow us to deepen our connections to the communities we already serve and expand our reach – stepping into the
places where there are unmet needs. We’re already deeply embedded in SLC neighborhoods, but as the city grows, we must continue
to invest in the Library system so we can be active in contributing to a flourishing Salt Lake City. I’m confident that this budget
propels us toward the City’s collective goals.
A letter from the Executive Director
& Board President
We thank you for your close partnership and continued support!
4 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
T-shirt magic is made in the Main Library's Creative Lab.
Seed Libraries are now available at every branch!
5Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Birdwatching with a City Library Binocular Kit.Reading with a child.
The City Library's beekeeper examines a honeycomb.
6 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Staff Position FY24 FY25 FY25 − FY24
Difference
Accountant 1 0 -1
Accountant/Payroll Coordinator 0 1 1
Accounting Specialist 1.45 1.45 —
Administrative Assistant 0.475 1 0.525
Administrative Manager 1 3 2
Assistant Director 7 6 -1
Assistant Manager 4 10 6
Associate Librarian 20.8 21.35 0.55
Audio Visual Specialist 1 1 —
Cataloger 1 1 —
Circulation Supervisor 2 2 —
Community Garden Associate 0.45 0.45 —
Copy Editor & Public Relations 1 1 —
Creative Director 1 1 —
Custodial Manager 1 0 -1
Custodial Supervisor 2 2 —
Custodian 15.7 13.7 -2
Data Analyst 1 1 —
Delivery Driver 1 1 —
Deputy Director 1 1 —
Development & Donor Director 0 1 1
Equity Coordinator 1 1 —
Event Associate 1.45 1.45 —
Executive Administrative Assistant 1 1 —
Executive Director 1 1 —
Facility Manager 0 1 1
Graphic Designer 1 1 —
Help Desk Tech 1 1 —
Human Resource Associate 3.475 2.475 -1
Human Resource Project Manager 0 1 1
IT Tech 1 0 -1
Junior Designer 1 0 -1
Junior Project/Account Manager 0.475 0 -0.475
Librarian 42 41 -1
Library Aide 19.775 19.325 -0.45
Library Assistant 42.725 42.625 -0.1
Licensed Clinical Social Worker 1 0 -1
Literacy Initiatives Project Manager 0 1 1
Literary Project Specialist 1 0 -1
Logistics Coordinator 1 1 —
Maintenance Manager 1 0 -1
Maintenance Technician 5 6 1
Maintenance Supervisor 1 1 —
Manager 14 15 1
The FY25 Budget adds 8.425 FTE in new positions.
Proposed Staffing Additions:
• Four Assistant Managers
• Three part-time Library Assistants
• One Safety Associate
• One Social Worker
• One Development & Donor Coordinator
Staffing Profile
The annual Firefighter Storytime program.
SLCPL’s social worker Nicole Campolucci.
7Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Staff Position FY24 FY25 FY25 − FY24
Difference
Marketing & Comm Assistant 0 0.475 0.475
Marketing & Comm Project Manager 1 1 —
Network & Systems Engineer 1 1 —
Network Administrator I 0 1 1
Organizational Development Coordinator 1 1 —
Passport Agent 0.9 1.8 0.9
Passport Supervisor 1 1 —
Procurement & Contracts Manager 1 1 —
Project Manager/Assistant Facilities
Manager 0 1 1
Safety Associate 8.9 10.9 2
Safety Manager 1 0 -1
Safety Supervisor 2 2 —
Senior Graphic Designer 0 1 1
Senior Network Support Technician 1 1 —
Senior Software Support Engineer 1 1 —
Service Coordinator 3 3 —
Social Media Manager & Photographer 1 1 —
Social Services Coordinator 0 1 1
Social Worker 0 1 1
Staff Development Coordinator 1 1 —
Substitute Supervisor 1 0 -1
Tech Services Specialists 2 2 —
Technology Assistant 2.25 2.25 —
Technology Associate 2.425 1.425 -1
Technology Librarian 1 1 —
Technology Maintenance Tech 0 1 1
Technology Coordinator 1 0 -1
Trainer 1 1 —
Web Developer 1 1 —
Total 241.25 249.675 8.425
Sta ffing Profile ContinuedStaffing Profile
The Plot Community Garden at the Main Library.
EOD Manager Rita Christensen served on
the ALA’s Caldecott Awards committee.
Summertime Gardening Fundamentals
workshop.
8 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Charges for Services
Printer Revenues 24,070 25,000 20,000 (5,000)(20.0%)
Passport Services 215,571 181,500 145,000 (36,500)(20.1%)
Non-Resident Fees 17,179 16,000 16,000 0 0.0%
Subtotal 256,820 222,500 181,000 (41,500)(18.7%)
Intergovernmental Revenues
Grants - Federal 0 0 400,000 400,000 100.0%
Reimbursements - E Rate 21,424 23,700 20,000 (3,700)(15.6%)
Grants - State 49,921 47,000 44,000 (3,000)(6.4%)
RDA Rebate 849,099 900,000 850,000 (50,000)(5.6%)
Subtotal 920,444 970,700 1,314,000 343,300 35.4%
Tax Revenues FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Current Year Property Taxes 22,209,135 22,971,395 27,931,859 4,960,464 21.6%
Personal Property Taxes 2,465,830 1,944,825 2,284,361 339,536 17.5%
Property Taxes – Pass Through 987,705 800,000 1,280,000 480,000 60.0%
Delinquent Property Taxes 522,290 450,000 450,000 0 0.0%
Motor Vehicle Taxes 834,225 800,000 800,000 0 0.0%
Judgment Levy 141,026 293,205 100,000 (193,205)(65.9%)
Property Taxes (Contingency)0 0 1,878,000 1,878,000 100.0%
Subtotal 27,160,211 27,259,425 34,724,220 7,464,795 27.4%
Tax Year
2019
Tax Year
2020
Tax Year
2021
Tax Year
2022
Tax Year
2023
Tax Year
2024 est.
Certified
Tax Rate .000741 .000680 .000649 .000615 .000580 .000710
Residential
Property $40.76 $37.40 $35.70 $33.83 $31.90 $39.06
Commercial
Property $741.00 $680.00 $649.00 $615.00 $580.00 $710.00
This chart reflects the estimated property tax amount for each $100,000 of residential property
value and each $1,000,000 of commercial property value.
Tax Year 2024 amounts are based on FY25 budgeted real and personal property tax revenue less
estimaged new growth and a five percent increase in 2023 property values.
Tax Revenues
The Library’s primary source of funding is
property taxes. Current Year Property Tax
revenue has been budgeted at the amount
generated by the 2023 certified tax rate plus
an estimated amount for new growth of
$300,000 and a proposed increase of $5.3
million. The Library’s current property tax
rate is 0.000580, which is 58.0 percent of
the ceiling established by the Utah State
statute. If the proposed tax rate increase is
adopted, the 2024 estimated tax rate would
be 0.000710.
The Library is also required to budget for
property tax revenues collected by Salt Lake
County that are paid directly to other
government entities without coming directly
to the Library. An offsetting transfer from
the Library equal to this revenue is reflected
in the Transfers from the Library. The
amount of this transfer for FY25 is
estimated at $1,280,000.
General Fund Revenue
General Fund Revenue Overview
Revenue categories have been budgeted based on historical trends, current year
projections, and economic considerations. The color-coded explanations compare
the FY24 and FY25 budgets.
9Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Total Revenues FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Subtotal 29,044,448 33,012,370 36,446,370 3,434,000 10.4%
Fund Balances Appropriated
Fund Balance - Appropriated 0 4,023,640 0 (4,023,640)(100.0%)
Subtotal 0 4,023,640 0 (4,023,640)(100.0%)
Contributions & Transfers
Donations 9,294 2,500 2,500 0 0.0%
Subtotal 9,294 2,500 2,500 0 0.0%
Miscellaneous Revenues
Interest Earnings 644,411 445,000 150,000 (295,000)(66.3%)
Rents - Facilities 9,309 9,500 9,500 0 0.0%
Rents - Commercial Space 9,910 33,105 30,000 (3,105)(9.4%)
Sundry Revenues 14,369 26,000 15,150 (10,850)(41.7%)
Subtotal 677,999 513,605 204,650 (308,955)(60.2%)
Charges for Lost/Damaged Items FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Charges for Lost/Damaged Items 19,680 20,000 20,000 0 0.0%
Subtotal 19,680 20,000 20,000 0 0.0%
Intergovernmental Revenues
The FY25 budget for Intergovernmental Revenues is higher because
of an anticipated federal grant.
Charges for Services
Revenues from Charges for Services is anticipated to decrease
slightly, leveling off following post-pandemic increases as the Library
reopened and demand for services such as passports was
temporarily high.
Charges for Lost/Damaged Items
Revenue from Charges for Lost/Damaged Items is anticipated to
remain at consistent levels with FY24.
Miscellaneous Revenues
Miscellaneous revenue is budgeted to decrease as interest earnings
are projected to decline if interest rates settle and some of the
Library’s fund balances being used to fund capital projects.
Contributions & Transfers
The FY25 budget does not propose using any of the General Fund
balance, as projects in recent years have drawn down some of these
funds for one-time expenditures and capital projects. Transfers from
the General Fund include $3,894,000 for capital projects and
$986,000 to make payments on bonds for the Marmalade and
Glendale branches.
Showing love for the Great Salt Lake with a writing and crafting program.
10 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
General Fund Expenditures
Materials & Supplies
Subscriptions & Memberships 32,031 45,705 46,063 358 0.8%
Publicity 229,540 203,570 249,700 46,130 22.7%
Travel & Training 179,258 213,485 221,384 7,899 3.7%
Office Supplies & Expense 13,346 14,000 14,000 0 0.0%
Postage 29,221 30,500 31,850 1,350 4.4%
Special Department Supplies 301,910 402,930 435,476 32,546 8.1%
Printer Copier Paper 8,769 8,000 9,000 1,000 12.5%
Printer Copier Toner 54,120 57,000 65,000 8,000 14.0%
Subtotal 848,195 975,190 1,072,473 97,283 10.0%
Personnel FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Salaries & Wages - Regular 11,788,485 12,858,000 14,177,986 1,319,986 10.3%
Overtime - Regular 26,264 0 15,000 15,000 100.0%
Salaries & Wages - Flex 178,385 146,000 155,345 9,345 6.4%
Social Security - Regular 880,148 984,900 1,084,616 99,716 10.1%
Social Security - Flex 13,615 11,170 11,390 220 2.0%
Employee Insurance 1,663,774 2,316,500 2,746,835 430,335 18.6%
Retiree Insurance 20,400 20,400 60,020 39,620 194.2%
State Retirement 1,653,728 1,777,300 2,125,631 348,331 19.6%
Workers Compensation 23,789 38,600 43,073 4,473 11.6%
Unemployment Insurance 2,784 3,000 3,000 0 0.0%
Other Employee Benefits 83,403 119,065 97,565 (21,500)(18.1%)
Employee Appreciation 9,550 13,000 13,400 400 3.1%
Subtotal 16,344,325 18,287,935 20,533,861 2,245,926 12.3%
The City Library will continue to offer a high
deductible health plan and a contribution to
each employee’s health savings account.
The FY25 budget reflects a projected 10
percent increase in premiums. The Library
covers 100 percent of employee coverage
and 90 percent of employee plus dependent
premiums. The Library’s contributions to
health savings accounts are as follows:
$1,000 for single coverage and $2,000 for
employee plus dependent coverage.
For details on the Library’s staffing, refer to the
Staffing Profile on pages 6-7.
Personnel Overview
Personnel expenditures account for
approximately 70 percent of the Library’s
overall operating budget (General fund less
Transfers to the Capital and Debt Service
funds and Payments to Other Governments),
which is consistent with recent fiscal years.
The FY25 budget proposes a 5.5 percent
salary increase for all Library staff which
consists of a 4.0 percent cost of living
adjustment and a 1.5 percent longevity
adjustment.
General Fund
Expenditures
Overview
The color-coded explanations
compare the FY24 and FY25
expenditures.
11Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Services
Professional & Technical Services 137,352 123,700 451,436 327,736 264.9%
Security Contracts 54,066 45,250 53,400 8,150 18.0%
Technology Contracts 494,799 592,765 850,202 257,437 43.4%
City Administrative Charges 0 30,500 30,500 0 0.0%
Cataloging Charges 102,069 102,000 117,000 15,000 14.7%
Staff Training & Development 42,200 64,040 98,186 34,146 53.3%
Programming 265,557 304,895 307,345 2,450 0.8%
Board Development 12,549 7,000 10,000 3,000 42.9%
Interlibrary Loans 633 500 650 150 30.0%
Subtotal 1,109,225 1,270,650 1,918,719 648,069 51.0%
Buildings, Grounds, & Equpipment FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Fuel 10,511 12,000 12,000 0 0.0%
Maintenance - Equipment & Furniture 235,281 312,390 360,752 48,362 15.5%
Maintenance - Vehicles 8,384 10,500 10,500 0 0.0%
Maintenance - Buildings & Grounds 669,670 748,440 729,650 (18,790)(2.5%)
Utilities - Boiler Operations 99,643 115,000 115,000 0 0.0%
Utilities - Electricity 424,572 439,000 439,000 0 0.0%
Utilities - Natural Gas 273,640 199,500 199,500 0 0.0%
Utilities - City Services 93,827 94,500 94,500 0 0.0%
Utilities - Garbage 37,829 39,600 39,600 0 0.0%
Utilities - Telecommunications 94,176 76,855 109,963 33,108 43.1%
Subtotal 1,947,533 2,047,785 2,110,465 62,680 3.1%
Materials & Supplies
Overview
Funding for publicity, travel and training, and
printing supplies are proposed to increase by
approximately 10 percent to increase visibility
and awareness of library services, provide
staff with opportunities for professional
development, and adequately meet patron
demand for programming and services.
Buildings, Grounds, &
Equipment Overview
This budget category is proposed to
increase slightly by three percent to
address equipment and furniture
maintenance needs.
Services Overview
Services are budgeted to increase due to the
expansion and cost of technology hardware
and software service contracts.
Other Charges Overview
An increase in property and liability insurance
is being proposed in this category.
Other Charges
Insurance 372,901 439,100 559,572 120,472 27.4%
Rents 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Sundry Expense 70,600 25,400 31,230 5,830 23.0%
Executive Discretion 4,043 20,000 20,000 0 0.0%
Staff Innovation 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Subtotal 447,544 484,500 610,802 126,302 26.1%
12 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Total Expenditures FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Subtotal 28,254,599 33,012,370 35,417,920 2,405,550 7.3%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 789,849 0 1,028,450 --
Transfers, Grants, & Donations
Transfer to Capital Project Fund 2,271,500 5,841,700 3,894,000 (1,947,700)(33.3%)
Transfer to Debt Service Fund 936,925 985,500 986,000 500 0.1%
Payments to Other Governments 987,705 800,000 1,280,000 480,000 60.0%
Grants - Federal 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Grants - State 50,421 47,000 47,000 0 0.0%
Donations 6,202 0 0 0 0.0%
Subtotal 4,252,753 7,674,200 6,207,000 (1,467,200)(19.1%)
Collections & Capital Outlays FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Land 1,279,479 0 0 0 0.0%
Buildings 2,710 0 0 0 0.0%
Improvements 0 660 0 (660)(100.0%)
Equipment 11,737 6,450 0 (6,450)(100.0%)
Furnishings 6,645 0 0 0 0.0%
Technology 2,499 0 9,600 9,600 100.0%
Print Materials 653,608 745,000 885,000 140,000 18.8%
Audio Materials 45,176 50,000 95,000 45,000 90.0%
Visual Materials 184,455 285,000 325,000 40,000 14.0%
Databases 214,589 210,000 250,000 40,000 19.0%
E-Books & Audio 814,782 875,000 1,300,000 425,000 48.6%
Newspapers & Magazines 89,344 100,000 100,000 0 0.0%
Subtotal 3,305,024 2,272,110 2,964,600 692,490 30.5%
Ge neral Fund Exp nditures ContinuedGeneral Fund Expenditures
Collections & Other Capital Outlays
Overview
The collections budget is proposed to increase by $750,000
compared to the prior fiscal year. In addition to other collection
items, this allocation will improve the Library’s ability to provide
access to popular electronic materials and reduce wait times.
Transfers, Grants, & Donations
Overview
The transfer to the Capital Projects fund consists of the annual
transfer of $1,500,000 for designated facilities and technology as
well as $2,394,000 for other capital projects.
13Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Expenditures
Interest Payments 218,708 181,850 176,500 (5,350)(2.9%)
Principal Payments 765,000 801,600 805,000 3,400 0.4%
Administrative Fees 3,475 4,000 4,500 500 12.5%
Fund Balance - Unappropriated 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Subtotal 987,183 987,450 986,000 (1,450)(0.1%)
Revenues FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Interest 4,345 0 0 0 0.0%
Transfers 936,925 985,500 986,000 500 0.1%
Fund Balance - Appropriated 0 1,950 0 (1,950)(100.0%)
Subtotal 941,270 987,450 986,000 (1,450)(0.1%)
Debt Service Fund Budget
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Subtotal (45,913)0 0 0 -
Debt Service Overview
Funds necessary to meet the lease payments on the Glendale and
Marmalade branches are derived from a portion of the Library’s
certified tax rate designated for such. The designated revenues are
deposited in the General fund.
Granite School District’s youth Powwow group Li’l Feathers perform at Main during Native American Heritage Month.
The amount needed to meet the lease payment is then transferred
to the Debt Service fund. The Library is funding the lease payment
one year ahead of schedule — the FY25 transfer will cover the
payment for FY26.
14 Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
Capital Project Fund Budget
Expenditures
Cap Outlay - Buildings 913,474 9,200,335 899,000 (8,301,335)(90.2%)
Cap Outlay - Improvements 99,544 78,445 470,000 391,555 499.1%
Cap Outlay - Equipment 154,620 17,935 0 (17,935)(100.0%)
Cap Outlay - Furnishings 18,977 298,910 19,000 (279,910)(93.6%)
Cap Outlay - Technology 541,609 1,524,230 900,000 (624,230)(41.0%)
Cap Outlay - Foothill Branch Restricted 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Cap Outlay (Contingency Projects)5,500 0 1,878,000 1,878,000 100.0%
Fund Balance - Unappropriated 0 0 28,000 28,000 0.0%
Subtotal 1,733,724 11,119,855 4,194,000 (6,925,855)(62.3%)
Revenues FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Interest 277,698 0 0 0 0.0%
Sundry Revenues 2,104 0 0 0 0.0%
Transfer From General Fund 2,271,500 5,841,700 3,894,000 (1,947,700)(33.3%)
Fund Balance - Appropriated 0 5,278,155 300,000 (4,978,155)(94.3%)
Subtotal 2,551,302 11,119,855 4,194,000 (6,925,855)(62.3%)
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures FY23
Actual
FY24
Revised Budget
FY25
Proposed Budget
FY25 − FY24
Difference
Percentage
Change
Subtotal 817,578 0 0 0 -
• Repair of gutters and downspouts at
Anderson-Foothill Branch
• Parking lot refurbishment at Sweet
Branch
• New self-checkout machines
• Intrusion detection system
replacement
• Door replacement in Creative Lab
• Refurbish tenant unit for events
• Emergency exit door alarm bar
upgrade
• Bathroom renovations
• Conference room lighting
improvement at Day-Riverside Branch
• Stairwell and bathroom hallway
lighting at Chapman Branch
• Bookdrop safety upgrades
• Grant-funded projects including tree,
garden and shade structures
• Elevator access card installation
• Crescent wall roof renovations
• Smoke evacuation system repairs
• Safety IT system updates
• Computers, servers, and network
equipment
• Crash bar replacements
• Renovations and improvements to
Ballpark location
• IT network infrastructure upgrade
and data rewiring for branches
• Power box cover replacements
• HVAC system
• Exterior building tile replacement at
Marmalade Branch
• Tree removal and replacement
• Fire system upgrades
• Continuation of Library Facilities Plan
• Crescent wall light replacement
• Exterior paint and stain at Glendale
Branch
• Sorter upgrades
Revenues Overview
Funding for capital projects accounted for
in the Capital Projects fund comes from
three sources: a transfer from the General
fund, interest earnings on the cash balance
in the fund, and the Capital Projects fund.
The fund balance is a result of unspent
money accumulated from prior years. The
transfer from the General fund to the
Capital Projects fund includes the annual
$900,000 of designated facilities
maintenance funds and $600,000 of
designated technology-related funds.
Expenditures Overview
Budgeted capital projects are unique from
year to year based on needs and requests.
The list to the right features of some of the
proposed capital projects for FY25:
15Salt Lake City Public Library Proposed Budget, Fiscal Year 2025
400 S
20
0
E
13
0
0
E
2100 S
70
0
E
30
0
w
500 S
California Ave.
Co
n
c
o
r
d
S
t
.
90
0
w
500 N
F
S
t
.
9th Ave.
1300 S
600 N
500 S
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
D
r
.
H
i
g
h
l
a
n
d
D
r
.
1000 N
Sprague
Branch
Foothill
Branch
Ballpark
Branch
Glendale
Branch
Chapman
Branch
Main Library
Sweet
Branch
Marmalade
Branch
Day-Riverside
Branch
Pages 8-9
Revenue
Pages 10-12
Expenditures
Page 13
Debt Service
Fund
Page 14
Capital
Projects
Fund
Main Library
210 East 400 South
801-524-8200
Glendale Branch
1375 South Concord
801-594-8660
Anderson-Foothill Branch
1135 South 2100 East
801-594-8611
Marmalade Branch
280 West 500 North
801-594-8680
Chapman Branch
577 South 900 West
801-594-8623
Sprague Branch
2131 South 1100 East
801-594-8640
Day-Riverside Branch
1575 West 1000 North
801-594-8632
Corinne & Jack Sweet Branch
455 F Street
801-594-8651
The City Library Locations
333 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
334 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
335 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
336 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
337 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
This page intentionally left blank
338 Mayor's Recommended Budget FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
Overview of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Major Funding Sources
General Fund Dollars
(Most flexible funding source; can be spent on any project)
These are the City’s most flexible unrestricted funds available to be spent on any CIP project. The Council
transfers a portion of General Fund revenues into the CIP Fund as part of each annual budget in June.
The City collects a variety of revenue sources that all go into the General Fund such as property taxes,
sales taxes, franchise taxes, building permits and license fees, and many others. A Council audit identified
9% of ongoing General Fund revenues as an ideal funding level to help ensure the City keeps up with
capital investment needs. The City reached that 9% funding level in FY2023. In the prior two decades the
City’s annual General Fund transfer into the CIP Fund averaged closer to 7%.
Funding Our Future 0.5% Local Salt Lake City Option Sales Tax
(Critical need categories: housing, public transit, streets, and public safety; a fifth category of parks
maintenance was added in FY2023)
The 0.5% sales tax increase was authorized by the Legislature only for the capital city as part of the
State prison relocation from Draper. The City’s local option sales tax was increased as part of the
FY2019 annual budget and was branded “Funding Our Future” along with a Streets Reconstruction
Bond approved by voters (all those bond funds have now been budgeted). Prior to enacting the sales
tax increase the City conducted impact research, public hearings, open houses, workshops, letters,
online information, and other extensive outreach. The funds from the sales tax are limited to the
critical need categories as determined by the Council. The definition of the critical need categories
has evolved over the times such as expanding public safety from only police to also include 911
dispatch, fire, medical, and social workers. The number of categories was originally four and a fifth
category, parks maintenance, was added in FY2023. There is no legal limitation to the categories
which are subject to the Council’s annual appropriation process and subject to change.
Class C Funds
(State gas tax)
Class C funds are generated by the Utah State Tax on gasoline. The state distributes these funds to local
governments on a center lane mileage basis. The City’s longstanding practice has been to appropriate
Class C funds for the general purpose of street reconstruction and asphalt overlays. The Roadway
Selection Committee selects specific street segment locations as recorded in the Engineering Division’s Six
Year Pavement Plan which is regularly updated. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this
funding source and the County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation and Streets Funding.
Per state law, Class C funds may be used for:
1. All construction and maintenance on eligible Class B & C roads
2. Enhancement of traffic and pedestrian safety, including, but not limited to: sidewalks, curb and
gutter, safety features, traffic signals, traffic signs, street lighting and construction of bicycle
facilities in the highway right-of-way
3. Investments for interest purposes (interest to be kept in fund)
4. Equipment purchases or equipment leases and rentals
5. Engineering and administration costs
6. Future reimbursement of other funds for large construction projects
7. Rights of way acquisition, fencing and cattle guards
8. Matching federal funds
9. Equipment purchased with B & C funds may be leased from the road department to another
department or agency
10. Construction of road maintenance buildings, storage sheds, and yards. Multiple use facilities
may be constructed by mixing funds on a proportional basis
11. Construction and maintenance of alleys
12. B & C funds can be used to pay the costs of asserting, defending, or litigating
13. Pavement portion of a bridge (non-road portions such as underlying bridge structure are not
eligible)
County Quarter Center (0.25%) Sales Tax
(Limited to transportation and streets eligible uses per state law)
The County fourth quarter-cent transportation funding is an ongoing sales tax funding source dedicated
to transportation and streets. The City has taken a progressive view of transportation beyond a vehicle-
focused perspective and uses a multi-modal, more inclusive approach (walking, biking, public transit,
accessibility and ADA, ride-share, trails, safety, scooters, etc.). The Wasatch Front Regional Council
summarized eligible uses for this funding as “developing new roads or enhancing (e.g., widening) existing
roads; funding active transportation, including bike and pedestrian projects; or funding transit
enhancements. It can also be used for maintenance and upkeep of existing facilities.” (SB136 of 2018
Fourth Quarter Cent Local Option Sales Tax Summary June 22, 2018). Revenue from the 0.25% sales tax
increase is split 0.10% for the Utah Transit Authority or UTA, 0.10% for cities and 0.05% for Salt Lake
County as of July 1, 2019 and afterwards. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this funding
source and Class C funds.
Impact Fee Eligibility
(Four types: fire, parks, police, and transportation / streets)
Impact fees are one-time charges imposed by the City on new development projects to help fund the cost
of providing infrastructure and services to that new development. This is part of the City’s policy that
growth should pay for growth. A project, or portion of a project, must be deemed necessary to ensure the
level of service provided can continue with the additional impacts of the new developments (such as
serving more residents or workers). As a result, it’s common for a project to only be partially eligible for
impact fee funding (the growth-related portion) so other funding sources must be found to cover the
difference. It is important to note that per state law, the City has six years from the date of collection to
spend or encumber under a contract the impact fee revenue. After six years, if those fees are not
encumbered or spent then the fees are returned to the developer with interest.
General Impact Fee Guidelines:
1. Impact fees are to be used to keep a current level of service for new growth to a City.
2. Cannot be used to cure deficiencies serving existing development.
3. May not raise the established level of service in existing development.
4. Cannot include an expense for overhead, such as any cost for staff/administration, operation, and
maintenance.
5. Impact fees can only be used to pay for the portion of the project directly attributable to growth
(it’s uncommon for projects to be 100% eligible for impact fees).
6. Must be incurred or encumbered within 6 years from the date they are collected, or they shall be
returned to the developer with interest payments per state law.
7. Must use an adopted Impact Fees Facilities Plan to determine the public facilities needed to serve
new growth and set fees costs by development type.
8. Repair and replacement projects are not growth related.
9. Upgrade projects are not growth related.
10. Repair, replacement, or upgrades can be included as part of a mixed project where the scope will
create increased capacity to serve projected growth.
11. Impact fees must be spent in the same geographic boundary (service area) in which they are
collected. The City’s Impact Fee Facilities Plan designates the entire city as the service area. The
Transportation section was updated in 2020. The other three sections were adopted in 2016.
Pre-
Encumbrances
Budgetary
Balance
Recapture
Funding?
YES / NO / TBD
Status / Next Steps / Expected Completion Time / NotesCIP Appropriations as of 4/30/24
3000 CIP General Fund
Budget Encumbrances Expenditures
8315027-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 Bikeway - Close the Gap
8316026-CC11009-3000-PRG10030 Six Traffic Signal Upgrades, 9
8316046-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestrian)
8316070-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Warm Springs Park, 840 N 300 W
8317025-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 500/700 S Reconstruction
8317029-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 Bus Stop Enhancements
8317043-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Parks and Public Lands Compreh
8317049-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 UTA TIGER GRANT MATCH
8317055-CC10504-3000-PRG10042 Capital Facilities Plan
8318028-CC30004-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance
8318044-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 East West Connections Study
8318045-CC11009-3000-PRG10031 Bikeways Urban Trails
8318047-CC30004-3000-PRG10032 Rose Park Pedestrian Byway
8318048-FY24B2A4-3000-Miller Park Trail Access Improvements & Historic
Structures Preservation
$25,335.87
$2,125.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.12
$2,125.00
$0.00
$44,783.60
$111,728.57
$0.00
$0.00
$116,682.52
$0.00
$3,577.97
$0.00
$18,802.40
$15,386.50
$277.30
$12,460.08
$2,125.00
$12,875.67
-$2,125.00 Negative?
$103,181.93
$57,978.20
$636,768.27
$16,990.39
$7,343.15
$138,316.68
$4,928.32
$76,503.76
$970.74
$0.00 $103,181.93 This project was completed as part of 1300 South reconstruction Phase 2?
$0.00
$48,806.84
$16,990.30
$0.00
$5,262.61
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$8,048.47
$112,560.30
$13,194.60
$476,232.86
$0.09
$7,343.15
$16,371.55
$4,928.32
$72,925.79
$970.74
Being used to create the CAP?
$69,550.21
$152,283.00
$365,012.40
$42,699.34
$24,336.20
$0.00 $364,735.10 Original appropriation in 2018, then rescoped in 2024, is construction on schedule for this summer?
8318049-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Jordan R. Flood Control
8318053-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Parks and Rec HVAC
8319301-CC30005-3000-PRG10042 Delong & Parks Yard Improvement
8319401-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Glendale Park Playground Path
8319403-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 RAC Shade Structure and Playgr
8319405-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Rose Park Multiloop Trail
8319406-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 11th Ave Pavilion and Signage
8319621-CC11009-3000-PRG10030 Traffic Signals Upgrade
8319701-CC30005-3000-PRG10042 Library Parking Equipment
8319741-CC11009-3000-PRG10024 Westside Multimodal GF
8320401-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Liberty Park 7 Cany Fountain
8320402-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Hidden Hollow Water Enhancemen
8320404-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 10 E Senior Center Retaining Wall
8320405-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Libert Prk Drainage Fueling S.
8320406-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Community Parks Signage
8320407-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Three Creeks Con Phase III
8320442-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Match UT FHA Foothill Trails
8320602-CC11009-3000-PRG10030 Bus Stop Signal Enhancements
8320603-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 McClelland Str Phase 2a
8320701-CC30004-3000-PRG10035 Sorensen Unity Connecting Corr
8321400-CC30004-3000-PRG10040 Facilities Cap ReplacementFY21
8321401-CC30004-3000-PRG10046 Parks Critical Asset Renewal
8321402-CC30004-3000-PRG10031 Foothills Trail System Master Plan
8321405-CC30004-3000-PRG10042 Water Park Demolition, Fence & Sec
8321601-CC11009-3000-PRG10028 TransportationSafetyImprovmnt
8321602-CC11009-3000-PRG10030 Traffic Signals Upgrade 21
8321603-CC11009-3000-PRG10028 Transit Route Improvements
8619402-CC35001-3000-PRG10042 City-wide Park Walkway Safety
8619409-CC35001-3000-PRG10042 Fairmont Stream Access Beautiful
8619411-CC35001-3000-PRG10042 Westside Trail Connections
8619602-CC35001-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance
$9,869.79
$9,900.00
$28,726.80
$43,476.17
$3,405.83
$148,007.23
$47,079.30
$17,081.00
$150,296.57
$29,657.50
$270.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5,436.88
$0.00
$7,811.71
$0.00
$1,977.25
$0.00
$7,553.33
$13,162.82
$90,720.00
$0.00
$270.00
$168,674.81
$0.00
$0.00
$10,241.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$4,432.91
$9,900.00
$20,915.09
$43,476.17
$1,428.58
$0.00 $148,007.23 This project was completed so funds can be recaptured?
Negative?
$73.25
$6,572.50
$44,084.89
$669.20
$0.00
$160,463.38
$0.00
$39,452.72
-$2,654.32
$15,491.68
$28,988.30
$0.27
$60,547.12
$2,378.51
$94,837.45
$245,188.40
$389,685.31
$2,378.51
$94,837.45
$273,068.00
$492,800.00
$144,106.12
$772,948.19
$132,699.30
$875,000.00
$178,408.57
$168,497.19
$58,747.56
$57,212.57
$125,987.44
$370,071.20
$557,789.95
$5,886.33
$17,599.86
$249,922.91
$150,000.00
$53,075.86
$250,000.00
$2,648,507.00
$300,000.00
$32,748.00
$0.00
$17,638.60
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $492,800.00
$0.00 $144,106.12
Adjacent autoshop owner is not selling so funds can be recaptured?
This project has been cancelled?
$0.00 $217,030.18
$7,959.30 $30,524.75
$0.00
$11,840.29
$25,519.11
$0.00
$53,730.68
$11,110.60
$2,904.00
$298,980.92
$500.00
$555,918.01
$94,215.25
$0.00 $875,000.00
$160,691.92
$137,002.89
$0.00
$0.00
$87,146.84
$5,876.36
$5,975.19
$58,747.56
$3,481.89
$27,730.00
$0.00 $367,167.20
$17,500.00 $241,309.03
$5,386.33
$10,763.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $249,922.91
$6,836.86
$0.00
$0.00
$17,753.59
$0.00
$0.00 $2,054,880.00
$0.00 $0.00 $300,000.00
$32,723.00
$0.00 $150,000.00
8619624-CC11009-3000-PRG10042 1700 S Lane Reconfiguration
8620621-CC11009-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance
8621600-FY24B1D5-3000-Bridge Rehabilitation Jordan River
8621601-CC11009-3000-PRG10043 Bridge Maintenance FY21
8621602-CC11009-3000-PRG10050 Rail Adj Pavement 21
3023 CIP Transportation Fund
$0.00
$0.00 $250,000.00
$593,627.00
$35,322.27
$0.00 $25.00
8321620-CC11009-3023-PRG10028 Bus Service 600 N 1000 N
8321623-CC11009-3023-PRG10031 Urban Trails
8321624-CC11009-3023-PRG10033 Complete Streets Reconstructio
$741,875.25
$1,161,246.69
$483,102.36
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$20,757.25
$58,390.78
$0.00
$21,453.58
$102,883.62
$699,664.42
$999,972.29
$0.00 $483,102.36
8321625-CC11009-3023-PRG10035 Corridor Transformations
8321626-CC11009-3023-PRG10048 Alleyway Repaving
3031 CIP CDBG
$877,848.57
$122,938.48
$0.00
$0.00
$11,079.00
$0.00
$405.89 $866,363.68
$19,450.68 $103,487.80
8319062-CC30004-3031-PRG10044 Deteriorated or Missing Concre
3033 CIP Class C
$623.68 $0.00 $413.79 $0.00 $209.89
8314031-CC11009-3033-PRG10042 Driver Feedback Signs
8317359-CC30004-3033-PRG10042 Gladiola to Indiana 900S Seq C
8318023-CC30004-3033-PRG10042 Gladiola 900 S Imp
8321501-CC11009-3033-PRG10033 Street Reconstruction & Overlays 21
3037 CIP Impact fee Parks
$86,320.00
$112,657.56
$38,047.09
$891,249.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$47,760.00 $38,560.00
$0.00 $112,657.56
$0.00
$204,080.84
$38,047.09
$445,716.87$241,451.56
8416005-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 9 Line Park $1,733.03
$274,870.29
$327,678.45
$1,055.97
$9,350.26
$2,945.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,588.33
$0.00
$0.00
$274,763.28
-$855.30
$107.01
Negative?
8417011-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Marmalade Park Block Phase II
8417012-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Parley's Trail Design & Constr
8417013-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Rosewood Dog Park
8417014-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Redwood Meadows Park Dev
8417017-CC11002-3037-PRG10042 Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn
8417018-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence
8418002-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Cwide Dog Lease Imp
8418005-CC11009-3037-PRG10042 Bridge to Backman
8419103-CC11009-3037-PRG10042 Imperial Park Shade Accounting
8419150-CC11009-3037-PRG10042 Pioneer Park
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $327,678.45
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,055.97
$9,350.26
$2,945.50
$1,569.60
$261.73
$1,569.60 $0.00 Adjacent autoshop owner is not selling so funds can be recaptured?
$23,261.73
$262,043.30
$6,397.50
$3,052,937.63
$2,637.66
$404,139.04
$149,953.09
$12,431.49
$431,859.61
$54,807.56
$120,893.14
$240,239.26
$125,740.11
$132,208.33
$21,830.00
$23,000.00
$10,285.46$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $1,292,205.37
$0.00 $251,757.84
$0.00 $6,397.50
$232,188.77 $1,528,543.49
$0.00
$7,773.75
$148,344.68
$0.00
$10,461.27
$0.00
$0.00 $120,893.14
$133,125.00
$0.00
8419204-CC10504-3037-PRG10042 Park's Consultant's Contract
8420134-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Jordan Park Event Grounds
8420136-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 9Line Orchard
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,595.66
$17,131.22
$8,755.52
$4,328.20
$23,401.96
$0.00
$0.00
$133,125.00
$42.00
$379,234.07
-$7,147.11
$8,103.29
$397,996.38
$54,807.56
Being used to update the Parks section of the Impact Fee Plan?
Negative?
8420138-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Rich Park Comm Garden
8420142-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Wasatch Hollow Improvements
8420406-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks
8420420-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails
8420424-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 County #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen
8420430-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 FY20 Bridge to Backman
8421401-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Fisher House Exploration Center
8421403-CC30004-3037-PRG10042 Trailhead Prop Acquisition
3038 CIP Impact fee Streets
Adjacent autoshop owner is not selling so funds can be recaptured?
-$26,010.74
$95,133.22
-$15,115.95
$21,830.00
Negative?
Negative?
$240.01
$50,308.00
$30,366.88
$97,016.28
$0.00$0.00
8406001-CC30004-3038-PRG10042 Gladiola Street $15,168.98
$124,593.18
$42,832.69
$181,303.30
$22,744.01
$29,816.67
$46,882.65
$18,699.37
$386,297.86
$241,134.98
$790,235.70
$625,000.00
$0.00 $12,924.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $124,593.18
$0.00
$116,620.34
$0.00
$0.00
$5,480.00
$0.00
$43,651.89
$9,775.18
$2,244.33
8412002-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design
8416004-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr
8418003-CC11009-3038-PRG10031 Bikeway Urban Trails
8418016-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 500 to 700 S
8419203-CC10504-3038-PRG10042 Street's Consultant's Contract
8420110-CC11009-3038-PRG10028 Transp Safety Improvements
8420120-CC11009-3038-PRG10042 Complete Street Enhancements
8420125-CC11009-3038-PRG10033 Street Improve Reconstruc 20
8421500-CC11009-3038-PRG10028 Transportation Safety Improvements IF
8421501-CC11009-3038-PRG10030 Traffic Signal Upgrades
8421502-CC11009-3038-PRG10033 IF Complete Street Enhancement
3039 CIP Sale of Property
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$42,832.69
$64,682.96
$22,744.01
$12,374.31
$29,582.65
$18,699.37
$339,285.69
$117,067.34
$17,442.36
$11,820.00
$0.00
$3,360.28
$114,292.46
$55,845.95
$0.00
Being used to update the Transportation section of the Impact Fee Plan?
$0.00 $734,389.75
$0.00 $625,000.00
8318100-CC30004-3039-PRG10042 Fire Training Center
8381600-CC11002-3039-PRG10042 Regional Sports Complex land p
3041 CIP Insurance Proceeds
$19,313.38
$729,836.03
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$240,000.00
$0.00
$0.00 $489,836.03
$19,313.38 Are these funds being moved to the Surplus Land Fund?
Are these funds being moved to the Surplus Land Fund?
8320706-CC30004-3041-PRG10042 EQ DMG Life Safety $590,918.96 $0.00 $104,752.67 $241,108.88 $245,057.41 What is this; the label is unclear?
Capital Asset Plan (CAP) Council Requests from January 2019
1.Policy Goals and Metrics – Council Members requested high-level cost estimates for the City
to implement the below policy goals as well as any metrics. The Administration was invited to
recommend policy goals to the Council. Three cost estimates are included based on prior
discussions but may not represent the best currently available information. The table is intended
for discussion purposes and does not represent a comprehensive list of policy goals for Council
consideration.
Potential Policy Goals Potential Metrics High-level Cost
Estimate
Bring all facilities out of
deferred maintenance
Appropriations vs. funding
need identified in Public
Services’ Facilities Dashboard
that tracks each asset
$6.8 million
annually or $68
million over ten
years
Expand the City's urban trail
network with an emphasis on
East-West connections
Total paved/unpaved network
miles; number and funding
for improved trail features;
percentage of 9-Line
completed
$21 million for 9-
Line
implementation
Increase the overall condition
index of the City's street
network from poor to fair
Overall Condition Index
(OCI); pavement condition
survey every five years
$133 million cost
estimate (in addition
to existing funding
level)
Implement the Foothill Trails
Master Plan
Distance of improved trails
completed; number and
funding for improved
trailheads
$TBD
Advance the City's
sustainability goals through
building energy efficiency
upgrades
Energy savings; carbon
emission reductions $TBD
Focus on renewal and
maintenance projects over
creating new assets
Number, funding level and
ratio of renewed assets vs.
new assets
$TBD
2.Project Location Mapping – Council Members requested a map of all CAP projects. The idea
of multiple maps based on dollar value was discussed such as $50,000 - $999,999, $1 million - $5
million, and over $5 million.
3.Measure CAP to CIP Alignment – Council Members expressed support for annually
measuring the alignment of how many CIP Funding Log projects were previously listed in the
CAP and how many CIP projects receiving appropriations were previously listed in the CAP. A
high alignment would indicate the CAP is successfully identifying the City’s capital needs.
4.Council Adoption of CAP – The question arose if the Council should adopt the CAP each year
with the annual budget or potentially in the summer when reviewing project specific funding.
Does the Administration have a preference?
Regular CIP Project Costs; General Rules of Thumb
NOTE: Costs are estimates based on most recent information available (could be out of date), vary by project, and do not include ongoing maintenance
Parks
Restrooms (dependent on site and utility work)
Trailside Pit Toilet
Portland Loo (each) Existing Sewer Line
4 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line
8 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line
Studies
2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate 2022 Estimate 2023 Estimate
$150,000
$200,000
$350,000
$168,000 $200,000 $220,000
$224,000
$450,000
$700,000
$270,000
$550,000
$850,000
$290,000
$585,000
$915,000$550K - $600K
Site Master Plan $50K - $75K $75,000-$100,000
$75,000-$150,000
$200,000-$300-000
$90,000-$115000
$90,000-$175,000
$230,000-$350,000
$75,000-$115,000
$75,000-$175,000
$200,000-$350,000
Cultural Landscape Report
City-wide Comprehensive Study
Drinking Fountains
$150K - $250K
Installed with sewer connection
Playground Replacement
New Playground
$15K - $30,000
$150K - $250K
$150K - $250K
$35000- $50,000
$250,000-$350,000
$450,000-$550,000
$45,000-$62,500
$300,000-$450,000
$550,000-$650,000
$45,000 -$65,000
$325,000-$455,000
$585,000-$715,000
Multi-purpose Field Improvements
Native soil field $150,000
$400,000
$200,000
$400,000-$500,000
$1,000,000
$450,000-$550,000
$1,200,000
$525,000-$650,000
$1,300,000Sand-based field
Softball/Baseball Field Improvements (Each Field)
Fencing (6 ft. vinyl coated chain link)
Tennis Court Improvements (2 Courts)
Patch, repair and paint
$250,000
$45.00-$55.00/LF
$300,000
$54.00-$65.00/LF
$325,000
$58.00-$70.00/LF
$150,000
$250,000
$168,000
$300,000
$210,000
$360,000
$220,000
$400,000New post tension court
Path/ Trail Improvements
$25.00-$30.00/LF $30.00-$35.00 $32.50-$40.00/LFHand-built natural surface single track trail (40" width)
Machine-built natural-surface trail (40" width)
Asphalt Trail
Concrete Trail (6" thick)
Soft Surface - Crushed stone
$6-12/LF
$20-25/LF
$3.50/SF
$4.50/SF
$2.50/SF
$10.00-$15.00/LF
$5.00/SF
$8.00/SF
$6.00-$10.00/ SF
$13.00-$18.00
$7.00/SF
$13.00-$20.00/LF
$10.00/SF
$12.00/SF $15.00/SF
$8.00-$13.00/SF
$330,000-$460,000
85000+
$600
$135,000-$250,000
$10.00-$15.00/SF
$365,000-$500,000
$90,000+
$750
$145,000-$275,000
Off-leash Dog Parks
Irrigation Systems Per Acre
Tree Replacements (Each 2-inch caliper)
Natural Area Restoration Per Acre
$250K - $350K $ 280,000-$392,000
$52,000+
$350
$75,000 +
$750
$100K - $200K $ 112,000- $224,000
Transportation 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate
$600,000+
2022 Estimate
$700,000
2023 Estimate
$746,000Bike - One Mile Cycle Track/Lane Mile (3 lane miles = 1.5
actual miles)
Bike - One Lane Mile (2 lane miles = 1 mile actual mile)
Bike - Protected Lane Mile (200 West 2015)
Traffic Signals - New
$500,000+
$ 2,000+
$400,000
$250,000
$250,000
$130,000
$60,000
$2,500+
$500,000-1,000,000
$350,000
$4,000
$750,000-$1,250,000
$400,000
$4,300
$799,000-$1,331,000
$426,000
Traffic Signals - Upgrades $350,000
$150,000
$75,000
$400,000
$175,000
$85,000
$426,000
$350,000
$90,000
HAWK Signals
Crosswalk - Flashing
Crosswalk - School Crossing Lights $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $37,000
Crosswalk - Colored/Stamped varies based on width of
road
Driver Feedback Sign
Speed Table / Raised Crosswalk
Pedestrian Refuge Island
$18,000-$27,000 $20000 - $30000 $21,500 - $32,000$15K - $25K
$8,000 $9,500
$30,000
$12,000
$11,000
$40,000
$15,000
$12,000
$43,000
$16,000
$25,000
$10,000
Curb Extension at Intersection
Crosswalk
$20,000 $25,000
$1,800
$30,000
$2,000
$32,000
$2,200$1,600
Streets
Asphalt Overlay (Lane Mile)
Crack Seal (Lane Mile)
2019 Estimate
$280,000
$5,000
2021 Estimate
$335,000
$6,000
2022 Estimate
$360,000
$8,000
2023 Estimate
$587,000
$11,000
Road Reconstruction - Asphalt (Lane Mile)
Road Reconstruction - Asphalt to Concrete (Lane Mile)
Sidewalk slab jacking (per square foot)
Sidewalk replacement (per square foot)
$500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $761,000
$700k - $1.2 M $840,000 - $1,440,000 $1,000,000 - $1,700,000 $1,088,000 - $1,811,000
$4
$ 7 - $10
$5
$8 - $12
$6
$9 - $15
$7
$ 12 - $17
Note: Last updated July 2023
Livable Streets Program Progress – Summary
From the Transportation Division
During the first two years of the Livable Streets Program, staff were hired and trained, and public
involvement and conceptual designs were completed for Livable Streets Zones 2-9. Engineering designs
will soon be complete for Zones 2-4 and Phase 2 of Zone 1. Construction is expected for Zones 1-4 this
Summer/Fall. Engineering Design is planned for Zones 5-9, this coming Summer/Fall.
$3.6M has been appropriated the past two fiscal years for the program, with an additional $500K for
Quick Build projects. Of this, almost all Quick Build funding has been spent, and $155K of the zone-based
programmatic funds have been spent. Design and engagement are low-cost relative to construction, so
we will see the spend down accelerate as these zones go to construction starting this summer. We
expect the remainder of the previous funding appropriation to cover construction of Zones 2-4 and
Phase 2 of Zone 1 this Summer/Fall. We don’t expect the remainder of this appropriation to be sufficient
to cover the entire construction needs of Zones 5-9, which could occur as early as Spring/Summer 2025.
Livable Streets Progress to Date
Zone 1 (Capitol Hill)
•Phase 1 - Construction Completed Summer/Fall 2023 – CCIP Funding
•Phase 2 – Construction Scheduled for Summer 2024 - Livable Streets Funding.
Zone 2 (Central Sugar House), Zone 3 (Glendale at the Sorenson), and Zone 4 (Poplar Grove at the
Chapman Library)
•Public Involvement Completed in Fall 2023
•100% Design Drawing to be Distributed for Review this Week
•Construction to Begin Summer 2024
Zone 5 (Bees in the Ballpark), Zone 6 (Jordan Meadows), Zone 7 (Fairpark West), Zone 8 (Central City
at Richmond Park), and Zone 9 (Edison in Poplar Grove)
•Public Involvement Completed May 2024
•Engineering Design to Begin Summer 2024
•Construction Expected Spring/Summer 2025 – Scope Based on Available Funding
Zones 10-19
•Public Involvement Summer/Fall 2024
•Engineering Design to Begin Winter 2024/2025
•Construction 2025 or 2026 - Based on Available Funding
West Sugar House Traffic Calming
•Livable Streets Funds Used to Complete this Constituent Project in Winter 2023/2024
Quick-Build Safety Projects
•Purchase Traffic Counters for Livable Streets Projects
•Replace Delineators on 300 S & 200 W Protected Bike Lanes
•1300 S/2100 E Safety Project
•Emery St Safety Project (700 S – Indiana Ave)
•400 E Safety Project (Downingtown Ave – Hollywood Ave)
•2150 E Westminster Ave School Crosswalk Improvements
•700 S 1300 E - West Leg Crosswalk Improvements
•600 West, Hollywood Ave & South Temple St Traffic Circle Improvements
•In-Roadway “Stop for Pedestrians” Signs at Seven Locations
•Westmoreland Dr 1500 E Safety Project
•Kensington Ave/Ken Rey St/Bryan Ave Safety Project
•1700 S 1000 E Safety Project
•1240 E Westminster Ave Safety Project
•Navajo St Harris Ave Intersection Safety Project (June 2024)
•1700 S 400 E Intersection Safety Project (June 2024)
•Downtown Sidewalk Restrictions signs (June 2024)
•Jordan River Trail Speed Limit Signs and Yielding Rules Signs (June 2024)
Note, the color coded prioritization map on the following page is from the Livable Streets Program 2022
Final Report page 13. Council staff added zone numbers one through seven to help compare the two
maps. An interactive version of the zones map is available on the Transportation Division’s website here:
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/livable-streets/#LivableStreetsProjects
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
89
10
1
Capital Improvement Projects FY24-25 Budget
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
FY25 Application Map
2
https://maps.slcgov.com/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=64074a434d9b4e5f86000306b65813a2
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
FY25 Application Summary
3
Overview
Total # of Applications 72
# of Internal Applications 32
# of Constituent Applications 40
Total # of Projects Recommended 31
Total $ Funding Requested $90,390,096
Total $ Funding Recommended
*includes 2 Mayor added projects $41,559,290
# of Constituent Projects Recommended 9
Total Constituent $ of Recommended $2,824,200
$0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000
Arts Council
Engineering
Fire
Police
Public Lands
Public Services
Transportation
Requested Funding
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
2025 Requests – Constituent ~$18,000,000
4
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CW
$1,335,000 ,
7%$650,000 , 4%
$7,790,496 ,
44%
$8,021,000 ,
45%
Engineering Art focused Public Lands Transportation
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
2025 Requests – Internal ~$72,600,000
5
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
$45,000,000
$50,000,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CW
$500,000 , 1%
$17,750,000 , 25%
$2,269,100 , 3%
$950,000 , 1%
$27,891,700 , 38%
$7,732,800 , 11%
$15,500,000 , 21%
Arts Council Engineering Fire
Police Public Lands Public Services
Transportation
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
Ongoing Expense Estimates ~$16,000,000
7
Project Total
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Sales Tax Bonds $8,725,477
ESCO Debt Service $923,600
Fire Station #3 $677,575
Fire Station #14 $498,550
Debt Service Projects Total $10,825,202
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
Crime Lab $600,000
City Leases $560,000
Facilities Maintenance $350,000
Urban Trails Maintenance (1/4 Cent)$200,000
Public Lands Maintenance $250,000
Public Lands Maintenance (FOF)$683,152
Community and Neighborhoods- Surplus Land RES $700,000
Ongoing Projects Total $3,693,152
O
t
h
e
r
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
Public Services- ESCO County Steiner $155,300
Public Services - Memorial House $20,000
FY25 Landfill $1,500,000
Other Ongoing Total $1,675,300
Estimated Total $16,193,654
2025 Available Funding
General
Fund Class C Parks Impact
Fee FOF Street FOF Other FOF Transit ¼ Cent Tax Capital
Maintenance Total
Available (est.)$7,330,000 $4,250,000 $20,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,154,490 $1,000,000 $8,000,000 $15,000,000 $57,734,490
Recommended $7,330,000 $4,250,000 $3,824,800 $1,000,000 $1,154,490 $1,000,000 $8,000,000 $15,000,000 $41,559,290
Remaining $0 $0 $16,175,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,175,200
8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
FY25 Mayor Recommendations
9
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CW
Council District
$2,824,200 , 7%
$38,735,090 , 93%
Constituent Internal
10
Mayor Recommendations
Dept/Div
Council
District Application Title
Total
Recommended
Funding CDCIP Score
Fire 2 Stabilize the Fire Training Tower Deterioration $858,800 76.48
Engineering 2 400 South Jordan River Bridge Reconstruction $4,000,000 74.16
Public Lands 5 Liberty Park Greenhouse Restoration $124,000 67.44
Engineering CW Complete Streets Reconstruction 2025 $3,500,000 65.09
Public Lands 5
Liberty Park Greenhouse Design and Construction
Documents $921,700 60.34
Engineering CW Complete Streets Overlay 2025 $2,750,000 59.57
Engineering CW Public Way Concrete 2025 $500,000 59.49
Public Services CW Facilities Replacement and Renewal Plan $1,366,350 59.06
Public Services 4 Plaza 349 HVAC Improvements - Phase I $2,200,000 57.47
Transportation CW Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Transit $750,000 56.89
Transportation CW Safer Crossings Citywide $300,000 56.43
Public Lands 7 Sugar House Park – Two Pavilion Replacements $480,000 55.03
Public Lands CW
Transitioning to Regionally-Appropriate Landscapes, Adapting
Irrigation Systems, and Reducing Water Use $500,000 54.48
Public Services 4 HVAC Control Replacement at PSB $1,300,000 53.49
Public Lands CW
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom
Conceptual Design $100,000 53.44
Transportation CW Neighborhood Byways Program $970,000 53.18
10
Mayor Recommendations continued
Dept/Div
Council
District Application Title
Total
Recommended
Funding CDCIP Score
Public Lands CW Courts & Playgrounds $549,150 52.34
Engineering 2 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding $4,500,000 51.54
Transportation CW Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrades Program $730,000 51.08
Public Lands 3
Memory Grove Park Urgent Repairs + Preservation & Maintenance
Plan $1,910,000 51.04
Public Lands 2 Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization: Doubling Bond Investment $1,300,000 49.60
Arts Council 4 Art Barn Failing Infrastructure and Accessibility Improvement Request $500,000 48.84
Public Lands CW Green Loop Implementation $3,140,000 41.86
Public Lands 1 Riverside Park Pathway Loop $530,000 38.81
Public Lands 7 Fairmont Park Basketball Court $754,000 37.69
Public Lands CW Street Futsal Courts $350,000 36.31
Engineering CW Alleyway Improvements and Mitigation 2025 $500,000 36.30
Public Lands CW Playground Shade $500,000 34.00
Public Lands 2 Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way $330,000 28.69
Public Lands CW Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)$86,200 26.75
Public Lands 2 5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)$50,000 24.31
Mayor’s Office CW Historical Signs/Markers $30,000 NA
Engineering CW Concrete Replacement $750,000 NA
Total $41,559,290
11
Capital Asset Planning: 1 FTE
Justification
The CAP Team is requesting a dedicated FTE to manage and report on Impact Fees. A
formal request for funding will be made in a future Budget Amendment.
This position is necessary to comply with the new level of detail required by the State
Auditor for the annual Impact Fee Report.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
Item Cost Type
(1) FTE $143,258 Ongoing, Impact Fees
Total $143,258
1
Financing for Maintenance of Capital Assets &
Newly Acquired Assets
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
12
One of the top priorities for the Administration is maintaining our existing properties. Therefore, the
new Capital Asset Planning Committee over the next several months will be reviewing all unfunded
maintenance for the entire General Fund.
a.They will assess and evaluate those needs based on the Captial Asset Planning matrix.
b.Once the maintenance needs are scored and assessed,the committee will come back to the
Administration and then the Council with funding options for these maintenance needs.
Examples of New Properties that need Maintenance
New Properties Delivery Date Project Delivery
Dept.
FY25 Pro Rated
Unfunded
FY25 Pro Rated
FOF Funded
Annualized
Costs
Glendale Park Phase I May-25 Public Lands $317,500 $198,900
9 Line Trail Mar-24 Transportation $41,500 $41,500
Backman Community Open Space Mar-24 Public Lands $32,800 $32,800
Marmalade Plaza Feb-25 RDA $50,400 $120,000
Life on State July-24 Transportation $75,500 $75,500
Sunnyside Ave Ped Improv.July-23 Transportation $11,400 $11,400
300 West Path/Landscaping Oct-23 Transportation $125,500 $125,500
700 East Pathway Oct-24 UDOT $54,000 $72,000
1000 W. 700 S. Roundabout Oct-24 Transportation $11,250 $15,000
I Street Bike Park Existing Public Utilities $25,000 $25,000
East Bench Property Apr-24 Public Lands $10,000 $10,000
Foothill Minor Trailheads Oct-24 Public Lands $10,000 $10,000
Complaint Based Weed Abate Existing Mayor’s Office $100,000 $100,000
Total $547,350 $317,500 $837,600
8
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
•LOOKING FORWARD
•Workday Integration/New Software
•IFFPs are in the process of being updated
•Need to revise Resolution 29 of 2017 and Cost Overrun
•FY25 CIP APPLICATION MATERIALS
•Dropbox link has been shared with Council Staff
Considerations
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FY24-25 BUDGET PROPOSAL
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
12
THANK YOU
Presented by Rachel Molinari and Mike Atkinson
Approved As To Form
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date ______________________________
Sign ______________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd
SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION
NO._________OF 2024
(Adopting Capital Improvement Program Allocations for fiscal year 2024-2025.)
A resolution adopting the attached Capital Improvement Program Allocations for the
fiscal year 2024-2025.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 46 of 2024, the Salt Lake City
Council (“City Council”) adopted a final budget for the Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”)
fiscal year 2024-2025; and
WHEREAS, the budget adopted by the City included a budget for the capital
improvement program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to formalize the appropriations for the capital
improvement program.
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt the capital
improvement allocations for the City for fiscal year 2024-2025.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Capital Improvement Allocations. The capital improvement
allocations for fiscal year 2024-2025, which were included within the 2024-2025 budget, shall be
and hereby are adopted according to the specific terms and conditions set forth on Exhibit A
attached hereto.
SECTION 3. Public Inspection. The City budget officer is hereby authorized and
directed to certify and file copies of these capital improvement program allocations in the office
of said budget officer and in the office of the City Recorder, which allocations shall be available
for public inspection during regular business hours.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of _____________, 2024.
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
_______________________ _______________________________
CITY RECORDER CHAIRPERSON
Item F1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet
Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024 - 5:30 PM
RE: MOTION SHEET Capital City Revitalization Zone
MOTION 1 (adopt)
I move the Council adopt the resolution endorsing the Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area and the
Participation Agreement between Salt Lake City and Smith Entertainment Group.
MOTION 2 (reject)
I move the Council reject the resolution.
MOTION 3 (adopt with legislative intent)
I move the Council adopt the resolution endorsing the Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area and the
Participation Agreement between Salt Lake City and Smith Entertainment Group.
I further move the Council request a report from the City’s financial advisors on financing options
including bonding to fully implement the 2021 Japantown Design Strategy infrastructure upgrades and
enhancements, and that the Administration recommend a preferred funding option. It is the intent of the
Council to consider these funding options for potential action this fiscal year.
I further move, in order to ensure an efficient development process on this transformational project, the
City and SEG commit to continue working with each other on the following issues and commit to
memorializing these in future development agreements:
•Establish a Construction Mitigation process: Recognizing the likely disruption to the flow of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic and the potential impact that may have on residents and
businesses in the downtown, SEG will have a hotline or central point of contact to address
construction issues. This could include a hotline and/or ombudsman who would serve as a
central point of contact and coordination between Smith Entertainment Group (SEG), Salt
Lake City (SLC), property owners, and the public. Their role would be to address concerns,
answer questions, and help mitigate any negative impacts on local businesses during
construction of the entertainment district; including but not limited to pedestrian access,
sidewalk availability, coverage or any other necessary remediations.
•Prioritization of Transit Development: The City will work with SEG and UTA to prioritize
the development of programs and incentives such as the “Salt Lake City's Tickets for Transit”
program, that improve public transportation options and promote ridership into the
entertainment district and downtown Salt Lake City. The SEG liaisons outlined in the
participation agreement will include in their report to the city, the steps and progress they have
made to maximize transit opportunities related to the district and future regional connections
into downtown.
•Comprehensive Planning Process for all Phases: A thorough and inclusive planning process
is essential for the entertainment district. This process should involve outreach to all
stakeholders, including the public and City stakeholders, to collaboratively create and develop
plans for this area, with an emphasis on design that maximize opportunities for pedestrian
access, connectivity and walkability.
1
KL
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DATE: July 5, 2024
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Date sent to City Council:
TO:Council Chair Victoria Petro
Council Vice Chair Chris Wharton
Council Members
Jul 5, 2024
PREPARED BY: Katie Lewis, City Attorney
Rachel Otto, Mayor’s Chief of Staff
RE: Second City Council Briefing on Proposed Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area and
Participation Agreement; Potential Vote to Endorse Project Area and Participation Agreement
REQUESTED ACTION: Second briefing July 9, 2024; Consider voting to endorse the Capital City
Revitalization Zone Project Area and Participation Agreement on July 9, 2024
POLICY ITEM: Capital City Revitalization Zone
BUDGET IMPACTS: This briefing is a follow-up discussion of the proposed deal points of a Participation
Agreement between Salt Lake City (City) and Smith Entertainment Group, LLC (SEG). After the briefing,
the Council may consider voting to endorse the Participation Agreement and Project Area. This is the first
step towards the adoption of an additional .5% sales tax City-wide to be dedicated to the renovation of Delta
Center and construction of a sports, entertainment, culture, and convention district.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For decades, residents of the City and the State of Utah have supported and
enjoyed the presence of professional sports downtown, and the teams are an integral part of the community.
During the 2024 general legislative session, the Utah legislature passed the Capital City Revitalization Zone
Act, Utah Code 63N-3-1301, et seq. (the Act), which authorizes the City to levy a .5% sales and use tax for
thirty years (Revitalization Tax) to be used for the benefit of revitalization projects within a designated
project area at and around Delta Center, which is the home arena to the existing NBA franchise and the new
NHL franchise.
Under the Act, the City may initiate the process to impose the Revitalization Tax upon receiving an
application from an entity that is a party to one or more professional sports franchise agreement(s) and that
will play their home games in an arena downtown. Upon receipt of an application, the City and applicant
may negotiate the terms of a proposed project area and participation agreement.
If the City endorses the proposed project area and participation agreement, the City will provide notice of
the endorsement to the state’s Revitalization Zone Committee, which committee has been established
pursuant to Utah Code 63N-3-1307.
Upon receipt of the City’s endorsement, the Revitalization Zone Committee has 30 days to review the
proposed project area and participation agreement. If the Revitalization Zone Committee endorses the
project area and participation agreement, the Committee will send notice of the endorsement back to the
rachel otto (Jul 5, 2024 14:44 MDT)
2
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
City for final approval and adoption of the Revitalization Tax and approval/execution of the participation
agreement.
SEG owns the Utah Jazz, the NBA franchise, and the Utah Hockey Club, the NHL franchise, whose home
games are both played at Delta Center.
On April 4, 2024, SEG applied to the City requesting the City impose Revitalization Tax to support a
proposed remodel of Delta Center and construction of a sports, entertainment, culture, and convention
district in downtown Salt Lake City.
Upon receipt of the application, SEG and the City negotiated a proposed project area that meets the
requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1302 (Project Area) and a proposed participation agreement that meets
the requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1305 (Participation Agreement).
SUMMARY OF TERMS: The Project Area and Participation Agreement are attached to this transmittal.
An overview of the terms is provided below.
•Project: SEG will design, develop, construct and complete renovations to Delta Center to make it
a first-class arena for the NBA and NHL teams. In collaboration with Salt Lake County, SEG also
intends to develop portions of the two blocks east of Delta Center as a sports, entertainment, culture,
and convention district. The Delta Center remodel and the development of the sports,
entertainment, culture, and convention district is described here as the “District”.
o During the design and construction of the District, SEG will use commercially reasonable
efforts to use sustainable development elements into the improvements and SEG will
endeavor to incorporate its construction contract bidding process readily available to and
easily accessible to small-, minority-, veteran-, and/or woman-owned contractors and
subcontractors.
o The City will require design guidelines in a separate development agreement for the
construction of the District.
o By the tenth anniversary of the Participation Agreement, SEG will complete and make
operational all elements of the District which are funded by the Revitalization Sales Tax.
•Maximum Dollar Amount: The maximum amount of net bond proceeds that SEG may receive is
$900,000,000. This will be paid from the Revitalization Tax collected by the City over thirty years,
which is anticipated to generate revenues of approximately $1.2 billion (present value) over the 30-
year life of the agreement.
o Of the $900,000,000, SEG currently estimates that it will spend $525,000,000 in costs for
the Delta Center remodel and $375,000,000 in costs for the other district improvements.
•City Administrative Fee: The City will receive up to 1% of the Revitalization Tax over the thirty
year period to reimburse the City for its costs incurred to create and administer the Project Area as
an administrative fee.
•Public benefits: In exchange for the commitment of public funding for the remodel of Delta Center
and construction of the sports, culture, convention, and entertainment district, SEG commits to the
following public benefits for Salt Lake City:
3
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
o Ticket fee: Starting on July 1, 2025, SEG will impose a fee on each ticket sold for events
at Delta Center. The amount of the ticket fee will be: a fee of $1 per ticket if the ticket
price is $25 or less; a fee of $2 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $25 but less
than $200; and a fee of $3 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $200.
▪The ticket fee will be delivered to the City, to be deposited in a separate City-
managed account (Public Benefit Account), to be spent on family-sized and
affordable housing and other public benefit initiatives as determined by the City,
and other initiatives the City identifies.
o Community Support; Workforce Development: SEG will support community and
workforce development initiatives by establishing or providing:
▪Apprenticeship Programs: During construction, maintenance, and operation of the
District, SEG will encourage local community partners to train a diverse and
competent workforce to become apprentices in sport-related trades. SEG will
focus on individuals from communities in Salt Lake City from households that
qualify for free or reduced lunch or otherwise meet the Income Eligibility
Guidelines published by the Utah State Board of Education (Individuals from
Economically Disadvantaged Families). SEG will conduct at least three in-
person outreach events per year.
▪College internship programs: SEG will offer at least fifteen (15) paid internships
per year for college students (with a goal of twenty-five percent (25%) of such
students with demonstrated financial need), for careers in the sports business. The
internships must be primarily on-site and in-person within the NHL team, the NBA
team, or SEG.
▪High school shadowing programs: SEG will work with the NHL team and the
NBA team to offer a shadowing program for at least ten (10) local high school
students (with a goal of fifty percent (50%) of such students who are Individuals
from Economically Disadvantaged Families) which will provide them the
opportunity to shadow in person a staff member or department within the
professional sports team organization or SEG, or the operator of the Delta Center,
to learn about the business of a sports organization. The program will be housed
within the NBA team, the NHL team, or SEG.
▪Annual lectures/Speaking engagements: SEG will collaborate with local Salt Lake
City high schools and middle schools for opportunities for members of the NHL
team (i.e. players, coaches or staff), the NBA team (i.e. players, coaches or staff)
or SEG personnel to speak to classes or student groups about the sports
4
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
industry. SEG will conduct at least four (4) of these in person outreach events per
year to such schools.
▪Youth programming: SEG will continue promoting the creation, development, and
growth of youth programming for both basketball and hockey in Salt Lake City,
SEG will invest $2,000,000 providing multi-faceted support to youth athletics in
Salt Lake City.
▪Free and subsidized tickets: SEG shall ensure that the NHL team and the NBA
team will each offer free or subsidized tickets to various home games each season
to Salt Lake City-based community organizations, with the goal of encouraging
Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families in Salt Lake City to attend
NHL and NBA home games.
o Gathering Spaces: As part of the development of the district, SEG will design
gathering/event/plaza spaces that will welcome members of the community to downtown
Salt Lake City. These spaces will include: (1) an outdoor event space; (2) walkways
connecting the public streets and rights of way to the district; and (3) landscape features
and other elements consistent with a place of gathering. These spaces are intended to be
operated and maintained such that they are inclusive and welcoming spaces for individuals
and families.
▪The Gathering Spaces will be owned, operated, and managed by SEG. The rules
and regulations for the gathering spaces will include a statement affirming SEG’s
support of non-discriminatory behavior on the basis of race, creed, color, ethnicity,
national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression,
age, or physical or mental ability.
▪SEG and the City will identify, on an annual basis, two mutually acceptable periods
of three days each, between May 1 and September 15, that the City or a community
organization designated by the City and approved by SEG can use one or more of
the gathering spaces free of cost for festivals and events.
o Japantown: As part of the development of the District, SEG will coordinate with the City
on its efforts to facilitate the recognition, revitalization, and/or redevelopment of the
Japantown community, located at 100 South and 300 West. SEG will meet, at a minimum,
twice a year for the first 36 months with members designated by the Japanese Church of
Christ and the Buddhist Temple, about SEG’s progress and planning efforts and to receive
input from the Japantown representatives about the development of the revitalization and
redevelopment of Japantown. Additionally, SEG will seek to incorporate the following into
the District development:
5
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
▪Activate the north side of 100 South in Japantown, including consideration of street
facing activated spaces and minimizing the number of truck loading and unloading
areas along 100 S and facing Japantown.
▪Create a pedestrian connection between the interior of the District and Japantown
including a spatial buffer between the District development and the Japanese
Church of Christ.
▪Use commercially reasonable efforts to incorporate Japanese architectural or
landscaping elements in the 100 South ground level facades facing Japantown.
▪Work with the Japanese American community to develop historical markers that
relate to Japantown’s history, with content approved by the local Japanese
American community. SEG will approve content and location of any historical
markers on SEG owned and controlled property. All historic markers will be
installed and fabricated by SEG using funds from the Public Benefits Account.
▪The City agrees to spend not less than $5,000,000 from the Public Benefits
Account for the revitalization and redevelopment of Japantown.
o Public Safety: SEG will provide a space within the District for use by security personnel
and Salt Lake City Police Department officers, including for the processing and holding of
arrestees.
o Public Art: The City will spend a minimum of $5,000,000 from the Public Benefits
Account towards the design, fabrication, installation, and maintenance of various pieces of
public art, including iconic art, in the District. The public art will be procured through a
mutually agreed upon process between the City’s Arts Council and SEG. The procurement
process will include a process for notifying and engaging with local artists to compete for
the opportunity to create public art.
•Transparency and Reporting:
o SEG will appoint a liaison to the City to be the point person to report on SEG’s use of the
Revitalization Sales Tax, progress on the construction of the District, and implementation
of the Public Benefits.
o SEG (or its liaison), will attend at least one City Council meeting per year to provide a
briefing and update on the District.
o SEG’s liaison will also provide reports summarizing the projects being constructed, an
accounting of the Revitalization Sales Tax received, a summary of the ticket fee, and the
status on the construction schedule of the District.
6
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
o SEG will provide an annual report to the City on the status of construction and design of
the Gathering Spaces, the status of the workforce development and community support
initiatives, and the number of public outreach events conducted by SEG for the community
support initiatives.
•Non-relocation provision: Should the agreement with the County be reached regarding the County
Lease as noted below and other conditions be met, both the NBA and NHL will play their home
games at Delta Center during the term of the Participation Agreement. If either team ceases to play
its home games at Delta Center, the City has a variety of remedies, including specific performance
or payment of damages.
•County Lease: SEG agrees that they will negotiate and endeavor to execute a lease with the County
for County-owned property necessary for the District development on or before July 1,
2025. Execution of the lease with the County is a condition precedent to the continued
effectiveness of the Agreement.
NEXT STEPS: The City Council may discuss and consider taking action on the Participation Agreement
and Project Area on July 9, 2024. If the City Council votes to endorse the Project Area and Participation
Agreement, the Act lays out the following next steps:
1. City staff will take all necessary steps to provide notice to the Revitalization Zone Committee of
the City Council’s endorsement of the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
2. Within 30 days of the Revitalization Zone Committee’s receipt of the City’s notice, they will review
the Project Area and Participation Agreement and, in a public meeting, vote to either approve or
reject the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
a. If the Revitalization Zone Committee rejects the Project Area or Participation Agreement,
they will adopt findings explaining the rejection, and the City and SEG will have an
opportunity to further negotiate or amend the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
b. If the Revitalization Zone Committee approves the Project Area and Participation
Agreement, they will provide notice to the City Council of such approval.
3. Once the Revitalization Zone Committee approves the Project Area and Participation Agreement,
the City Council may, in a public meeting, give final approval to the Project Area and Participation
Agreement.
4. After giving final approval, the City Council may vote in a public meeting to impose the
Revitalization Sales Tax.
RESOLUTION NO. OF 2024
(Endorsing the Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area and the Participation Agreement between
Salt Lake City and Smith Entertainment Group, LLC)
WHEREAS, for decades, the residents of Salt Lake City (City) and the State of Utah have
supported and enjoyed the presence of professional sports in downtown such that the teams are an integral
part of the community.
WHEREAS, during the 2024 general legislative session, the Utah legislature passed the Capital
City Revitalization Zone Act, Utah Code 63N-3-1301, et seq. (the Act), which authorizes the City to levy
a .5% sales and use tax (Revitalization Tax) to be used for the benefit of revitalization projects within a
designated project area at and around Delta Center, which is the home arena to NBA and new NHL
franchises.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City may initiate the process to impose the Revitalization Tax
upon receiving an application from an entity that is a party to one or more professional sports franchise
agreement(s), that will play their home games in an arena downtown.
WHEREAS, upon receipt of an application, the City and applicant may negotiate the terms of a
proposed project area and participation agreement, and if the City endorses the proposed project area and
participation agreement, the City will provide notice of said endorsement to the Revitalization Zone
Committee, which committee has been established pursuant to Utah Code 63N-3-1307.
WHEREAS, upon receipt of the City’s endorsement, the Revitalization Zone Committee shall,
within 30 days, review the proposed project area and participation agreement, and if they endorse, will send
notice of said endorsement back to the City for final approval and adoption of the Revitalization Tax and
approval/execution of the participation agreement.
WHEREAS, Smith Entertainment Group, LLC (SEG) is a party to both NBA and NHL franchises
whose home games are played at Delta Center, recognizes the City’s commitment and investment to
professional sports, and is committed to keeping both the NBA and NHL teams at Delta Center in Salt Lake
City.
WHEREAS, SEG applied to the City requesting the City impose the sales and use tax in accordance
with the Act.
WHEREAS, upon receipt of the application, SEG and the City have negotiated a proposed project
area that meets the requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1302 (Project Area) and a proposed participation
agreement that meets the requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1305 (Participation Agreement). The Project
Area is attached as Exhibit A and the Participation Agreement is attached as Exhibit B.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Salt Lake City Council (City Council) received notice of and
held a public meeting to take action on the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Project Area and the Participation Agreement and
find that endorsing the Project Area and the Participation Agreement is in the best interest of the City.
Katherine Lewis (Jul 5, 2024 14:42 MDT)
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows:
1. The City Council hereby endorses the Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area, attached
as Exhibit A.
2. The City Council hereby endorses the Participation Agreement, attached as Exhibit B.
3. The City Council hereby authorizes City staff to take all necessary actions to provide notice
to the Revitalization Zone Committee of the City Council’s endorsement of the Project Area
and the Participation Agreement.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah on , 2024.
Salt Lake City Council
Victoria Petro, Council Chair
Attest:
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Approved as to form:
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Exhibit A
Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area
Exhibit B
Capital City Revitalization Zone Participation Agreement
1
PARTICIPATION, TAX SHARING AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
(SEG Property)
by and between
SALT LAKE CITY
and
SMITH ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
2
PARTICIPATION, TAX SHARING AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
(SEG Property)
This Participation, Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the
day of , 2024 (the “Effective Date”), by and between SALT LAKE CITY, a municipal
corporation and body politic of the State of Utah (the “City”), and SMITH ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company (together with its affiliates, successors and assigns, “SEG”). The City and
SEG are referred to in this Agreement separately as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, acting upon the application of SEG and approval of the Revitalization Zone Committee
created pursuant to Utah Code Annotated Section 63N-3-1407 (the “Revitalization Zone Committee”), the City
created a project area (the “Project Area”) pursuant to the provisions of the Capital City Revitalization Zone set
forth in Utah Code Annotated Section 63N-3-1401, et. seq. (as amended or any successor or replacement
provisions, the “CCR Act”), which Project Area is generally depicted on Exhibit A-1 attached hereto (the
“Project Area Map”); and
WHEREAS, Jazz Arena Inventors LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of SEG, is the ground lessee of that
certain real property upon which Delta Center is located with the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
(“RDA”) as lessor. The property that is leased pursuant to that lease is referred to as the “Arena Redevelopment
Property”; and
WHEREAS, SEG anticipates leasing, pursuant to a long term ground lease with Salt Lake County, some
or all of certain other real property located in Salt Lake City, Utah and owned by Salt Lake County, which property
consists of substantial portions of the two Salt Lake City blocks located immediately east of the Arena
Redevelopment Property (together with the Arena Redevelopment Property, the “SEG Property”), which two
blocks, together with the Arena Redevelopment Property are generally depicted on Exhibit A-2 attached hereto;
and
WHEREAS, the SEG Property is within the Project Area and is being developed and redeveloped as a
sports, entertainment, culture, and convention district, including the remodeling of Delta Center as a professional
sports arena, lodging, multi-family housing and various commercial, retail, office, cultural and convention uses
and related improvements and facilities now in existence or contemplated in the future for the SEG Property as
more fully described on Exhibit B attached hereto (collectively the “District Improvements”); and
WHEREAS, the City created the Project Area to promote the development of sports, entertainment,
culture, and convention uses within the Project Area, including the SEG Property; and
WHEREAS, in connection with its development of the District Improvements, the Parties have committed
to invest a substantial amount of funds to re-model and renovate the existing sports arena located on the Arena
Redevelopment Property, commonly known as Delta Center, for purposes of making it available for use by a
National Hockey League (“NHL”) professional hockey franchise, in addition to its existing use by the Utah Jazz,
a National Basketball Association (“NBA”) professional basketball franchise (the “Arena Renovation” and
collectively with the District Improvements, the “District Redevelopment Project”); and
WHEREAS, the general purpose of the Arena Renovation is to modify the existing Delta Center arena
such that both NHL and NBA teams can play their home games at Delta Center, which is located on the Arena
Redevelopment Property (the existing arena and any modified arena located where Delta Center is currently
located shall be referred to herein as the “Renovated Arena”); and
WHEREAS, the City followed all of the requirements of the CCR Act and gave final approval of SEG’s
3
application; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined and the City Council expressly finds that the development and
operation of the District Redevelopment Project will revitalize the SEG Property specifically and the Project
Area generally and facilitate the maintenance of a professional sports presence in Salt Lake City generally and
particularly within the SEG Property; and
WHEREAS, incorporated into this Agreement is a master plan for the Project Area titled the Salt Lake
City Sports, Entertainment & Convention Project Area Master Plan (the “Project Area Master Plan”), a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit C; and
WHEREAS, the SEG Property is located within the area governed by the Project Area Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, on , 2024 the City followed all requirements of the CCR Act and Utah Code
Annotated Section 59-12-402.5 and adopted a 0.5% sales and use tax (the “Revitalization Sales Tax”) for a period
of thirty (30) years (the “Revitalization Sales Tax Period”) as authorized by the CCR Act and Utah Code
Annotated Section 59-12-402.5; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed that a portion of the Revitalization Sales Tax will be used for the
development of the District Redevelopment Project on the SEG Property pursuant to the terms and conditions
described in this Agreement and to facilitate or reimburse SEG for Eligible Expenses (as defined herein) related
to such District Redevelopment Project, as allowed by the CCR Act; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that monetizing funds generated by the Revitalization Sales Tax through
successful bonding will benefit the development and realization of public benefits anticipated from the District
Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate that the District Redevelopment Project and the creation of the Project
Area will produce significant and long-lasting positive benefits for Salt Lake City, including the promotion,
creation and retention of jobs, improved property values, increased outside private and public investment,
increased tax revenues, improved overall aesthetic and functionality of the Project Area and surrounding areas,
enhanced cultural and entertainment opportunities, increased tourism, and a general boost to the overall vitality
of Salt Lake City; and
WHEREAS, the citizens of Salt Lake City have supported and enjoyed the presence of professional sports
in Salt Lake City such that these teams are an integral part of the community, and SEG, recognizes that its
commitment, for the term of this Agreement, to keeping both the NHL and NBA teams in Salt Lake City is a
material and essential reason the City is executing this Agreement, and both the City and SEG are dedicated to
furthering their investment in the Salt Lake City community.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and performances set forth in this
Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:
3
ARTICLE I
INTERPRETATION AND EXHIBITS
1.1. Interpretation. Matters relating to the interpretation of this Agreement are set forth in Exhibit D
attached hereto.
1.2. Exhibits. Attached to this Agreement are the following Exhibits:
EXHIBIT A-1 Project Area Map
EXHIBIT A-2 Depiction of SEG Property
EXHIBIT B District Improvements Project Types
EXHIBIT C Project Area Master Plan
EXHIBIT D Interpretation and Definitions
EXHIBIT E District Redevelopment Conceptual Plan
EXHIBIT F Form of Transfer Acknowledgement
ARTICLE II
PROJECT AREA, PROJECT AREA MASTER PLAN AND AVAILABLE FUNDS
2.1 Project Area and Project Area Master Plan.
(a)Establishment of Project Area. The City has created the Project Area, which Project Area
includes the SEG Property, and other property in the vicinity of the SEG Property.
(b)Amendments and Modifications. The Parties acknowledge that the Project Area Master
Plan is a conceptual/illustrative depiction and general description of the presently anticipated development
plan and design for the Project Area. In the event both Parties agree that an amendment to the Project
Area Master Plan is necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Project Area, such amendment will not
adversely affect the rights or obligations of either Party under this Agreement. Such amendment to the
Project Area Master Plan shall follow the requirements of Section 13.11.
2.2 Funds Available for Eligible Expenses—Revitalization Sales Tax. The funds available for
payment of Eligible Expenses, including Debt Service (defined below), incurred pursuant to this Agreement
consist solely of the Revitalization Sales Tax. The Revitalization Sales Tax consists of specific taxes, allocated to
or collected by the City, in accordance with the terms of the CCR Act, for use within the Project Area. The Parties
expressly acknowledge that the Parties are subject to the requirements of the CCR Act. For purposes of this
Agreement, “Eligible Expenses” means any expense incurred by SEG in connection with the District
Redevelopment Project that qualifies as an “allowable use of funds” pursuant to Section 63N-3-1403 of the CCR
Act, including Debt Service.
2.3 Limitation on Revitalization Sales Tax. SEG understands and agrees that the City is entitled to
levy and receive and use the Revitalization Sales Tax only for the period and purposes established by law pursuant
to the CCR Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City represents and warrants to SEG that SEG's application
was properly endorsed by the City and the Revitalization Sales Tax was properly adopted by the City; and in the
event that any person fails to timely pay any tax that would become a part of the funds available for reimbursement,
the City shall take, and use reasonable efforts to encourage any other governmental entities to take, all actions
authorized by law to collect such funds from such person(s) in the manner provided by law. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in the event that the collection of the Revitalization Sales Tax results in lower-than-projected revenue
or is not sufficient to pay Debt Service or other expenses incurred under this Agreement, the City will have no
obligation or liability under this Agreement to pay that shortfall to SEG from any other City revenue source.
4
ARTICLE III
DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT; PUBLIC BENEFITS
3.1 District Redevelopment Project.
(a)Agreement to Develop and Construct. SEG agrees to develop, design, construct and
complete the District Redevelopment Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement. Subject only to the City’s express representations, agreements and obligations set forth in this
Agreement, including its obligations with respect to the Public Benefits Account (defined below), SEG
will be solely responsible for the cost of the design, permitting, and construction of the District
Redevelopment Project, including any cost overruns, such that no part of the cost to complete the District
Redevelopment Project shall ever become an obligation of the City, and any construction defects in the
District Redevelopment Project shall be remedied at the sole cost and expense of SEG.
(b)Home Game Covenant. At all times during the Term, SEG shall: (1) maintain both the
NHL and the NBA franchises in good standing in accordance with their respective league rules, including
by not volunteering for a contraction of the team within their respective league, and by defending the NHL
and NBA team’s right to play as a franchise in their respective league; and (2) ensure that both the NHL
and NBA teams play all pre-season, regular season, and playoff season home games at the Renovated
Arena (“Home Game Covenant”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Home Game Covenant shall not
apply to the following “home games:” international games pursuant to a league-wide program, initiative,
or series; outdoor games played in Salt Lake City; or “home games” played at other venues as
intermittently required by their respective leagues and as reflected on the applicable leagues’ official
schedule. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if both SEG and the City determine that the use and occupancy
of the Renovated Arena is unsafe, or damaged by casualty, condemnation, or an event of force majeure,
SEG may temporarily move the NHL and/or NBA teams to an alternate site. SEG will use commercially
reasonable efforts to obtain an alternative site that is within Salt Lake City boundaries.
3.2 Arena Renovation. A conceptual plan for the District Redevelopment Project is attached hereto
as Exhibit E (the “District Redevelopment Conceptual Plan”). The Parties acknowledge that the District
Redevelopment Conceptual Plan is a conceptual/illustrative depiction of the presently anticipated renovation and
design for the District Redevelopment Project.
(a)Arena Renovation Budget, Construction Timetable and Design Plans. In connection with
the development of design and construction drawings for the Arena Renovation, and prior to any draw
requests on any issued bonds that are secured by the Revitalization Sales Tax, SEG shall develop and
provide the City (which shall not be subject to the City’s approval) an estimated Arena Renovation
construction budget and estimated timetable for construction, including any construction phasing.
Additionally, and prior to any draw requests on any issued bonds that are secured by the Revitalization
Sales Tax, SEG shall ensure that the plans for the Renovated Arena (the “Arena Renovation Design
Plans”) comply with current and currently-anticipated NHL and NBA specifications, standards, and
requirements for new or modified arenas and SEG will consult with both the NBA and NHL to ensure
that the Arena Renovation Design Plans are sufficient to ensure SEG can comply with the Home Game
Covenant for both the NBA and NHL teams at the Renovated Arena and that the Renovated Arena is a
first-class professional sports arena.
(b)Compliance with Law. SEG shall ensure that the Arena Renovation Design Plans comply
with all applicable laws, including the American With Disabilities Act. SEG shall also use commercially
reasonable efforts to incorporate sustainable development elements in the Arena Renovation Design Plans
and the construction of the Renovated Arena. SEG shall comply with all other required laws and
regulations in the development, construction and completion of the District Redevelopment Project,
including paying all generally applicable processing fees adopted by the City related to ministerial permit
review and approval.
5
(c)District Improvements. Each project proposed by SEG as a District Improvement shall be
subject to such prior land use approvals and building permit reviews and approvals as are required by
applicable City laws and ordinances. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the list of District
Improvements Project Types set forth in Exhibit B is an illustrative list of project types that may be
proposed and could be approved as District Improvements. Prior to any draw requests on any issued bonds
that are secured by the Revitalization Sales Tax, SEG shall develop and provide the City (which shall not
be subject to the City’s approval) an estimated District Improvement construction budget and estimated
timetable for construction, including any construction phasing for the District Improvements. Any
approved District Improvement shall be subject to certain Design Guidelines set forth in that certain
Development Agreement between the Parties dated (“Development Agreement”),
and SEG further agrees to not expend the Revitalization Sales Tax, or bond proceeds secured by the
Revitalization Sales Tax, on District Improvements (other than the Arena Redevelopment) until the
Development Agreement is executed and the Design Guidelines are finalized. SEG shall also use
commercially reasonable efforts to utilize sustainable development elements into the construction of the
District Improvements. Additionally, SEG will use commercially reasonable efforts to make its bidding
process for the District Improvements readily available to and easily accessible by small-, minority-,
veteran-, and/or woman-owned contractors and subcontractors (“Contractors”) for the construction of
the District Improvements. Such efforts shall include establishing a notification and solicitation process
that ensures these Contractors have an opportunity to compete for contracts for the construction of the
District Improvements equal to other contractors responding to solicitations for proposal or other bidding
processes.
3.3 Public Benefits. In consideration for SEG directly or indirectly receiving the Revitalization
Sales Tax for Eligible Expenses up to the Maximum Dollar Amount (defined below), SEG shall provide the
following public benefits (“Public Benefits”) during the Revitalization Sales Tax Period:
(a)Public Benefit Ticket Fee. On or before July 1, 2025 and thereafter throughout the Term,
SEG will charge or cause to be charged on each ticket sold for any event in the Arena and Renovated
Arena a ticket fee (“Public Benefit Ticket Fee”). The amount of the Public Benefit Ticket Fee shall be
as follows: a fee of $1 per ticket if the ticket price is $25 or less; a fee of $2 per ticket if the ticket price is
greater than $25 but less than $200; and a fee of $3 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $200. The
Public Benefit Ticket Fee shall apply to the first, initial, or original sale of the applicable ticket only and
shall be in addition to any other fees or taxes levied or authorized to be levied on the sale of any event
ticket. The Public Benefit Ticket Fee shall not be charged or collected with respect to: (i) any free or
subsidized tickets provided to community organizations or others; or (ii) tickets for concerts or events
with respect to which SEG is not permitted to charge such fee by the applicable promoter or artist,
provided, however, that SEG will use commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate with such promotor or
artist to add the Public Benefit Ticket Fee to that promotor’s or artist’s event. The Public Benefit Ticket
Fee will be collected by SEG and remitted to the City on a semi-annual basis on or before the date that is
forty-five (45) days after June 30th and December 31st of the applicable year. The City shall maintain a
separate account for the collection and distribution of the Public Benefit Ticket Fees, which account shall
be controlled by the City (the “Public Benefits Account”). Expenditures from the Public Benefits
Account shall be made pursuant to the City’s lawfully adopted public policies and with an emphasis on
the expenditure of such funds for the City’s family-sized and affordable housing initiatives and such other
purposes as the City shall determine from time-to-time. In consideration of the Public Benefit Ticket Fee,
the City agrees that during the Revitalization Sales Tax Period, the City shall not require any increase in
the Public Benefit Ticket Fee or impose any other similar fee with respect to the Arena or New Arena.
The City also agrees that it shall not impose, pass or otherwise enact any new or additional tax or fee or
any charge for any event, entertainment or business activity occurring within the District Redevelopment
Project, including but not limited to taxes/fees upon any of the following: SEG controlled or managed
parking, food and beverage, merchandise, ticketing, entertainment, sporting events, concerts, shows,
festivals, etc. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may impose, pass, increase or otherwise enact a
new or additional tax, fee, or charge that has a City-wide application and is not related to ticketing for
6
events held in the SEG Property.
(b)Community Support; Workforce Development. SEG will support community and
workforce development initiatives pursuant to the following:
(i) Workforce Training and Development; Apprenticeship Participation. Duringthe
construction, maintenance, and operation of the District Redevelopment Project, SEG will
encourage local community partners, such as Salt Lake City high schools and local colleges, local
community groups, and local businesses to train a diverse and competent workforce and to
encourage individuals from households within Salt Lake City that qualify for free or reduced
lunch or otherwise meet the Income Eligibility Guidelines published by the Utah State Board of
Education (“Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families”), to become apprentices
in sports-related trades (e.g., facility maintenance and operations, sales and marketing, and
information technology). SEG will conduct at least three (3) in person outreach events per year
to such groups.
(ii) College Internship Program. SEG will offer at least fifteen (15) paid internships
per year for college students (with a goal of twenty-five percent (25%) of such students with
demonstrated financial need), for careers in the sports business. The internships must be primarily
on-site and in-person within the NHL team, the NBA team, or SEG.
(iii) High School Shadowing Program. SEG will work with the NHL team and the
NBA team to offer a shadowing program for at least ten (10) local high school students (with a
goal of fifty percent (50%) of such students who are Individuals from Economically
Disadvantaged Families) which will provide them the opportunity to shadow in person a staff
member or department within the professional sports team organization or SEG, or the operator
of the Renovated Arena, to learn about the business of a sports organization. The program will be
housed within the NBA team, the NHL team, or SEG.
(iv) Lectures/Speaking Engagements. SEG will collaborate with local Salt Lake City
high schools and middle schools for opportunities for members of the NHL team (i.e. players,
coaches or staff), the NBA team (i.e. players, coaches or staff) or SEG personnel to speak to
classes or student groups about the sports industry. SEG will conduct at least four (4) of these in
person outreach events per year to such schools.
(v) Youth Programming. SEG will continue its longstanding commitment to
supporting the education and enrichment of Salt Lake City’s youth, building on the engagement
and programming already in place through the NBA and Junior Jazz program. To continue
promoting the creation, development, and growth of youth programing for both basketball and
hockey in Salt Lake City, SEG will invest Two Million and 00/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00)
providing multi-faceted support to youth athletics in Salt Lake City.
(vi) Tickets. SEG shall ensure that the NHL team and the NBA team will each offer
free or subsidized tickets to various home games each season to Salt Lake City-based community
organizations, with the goal of encouraging Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged
Families in Salt Lake City to attend NHL and NBA home games.
(vii) City Identification of Communities with Individuals from Economically
Disadvantaged Families. Commencing on or around January 1, 2025, the City will provideSEG
with written notice on an annual basis of those communities in Salt Lake City with households
that qualify for free or reduced lunch or otherwise meet Income Eligibility Guidelines published
by the Utah State Board of Education, with the purpose of identifying the elementary-, middle-
and high-schools located within such communities for SEG to focus the initiatives described in
this section. Should the City fail to provide SEG with such regular annual written notice, SEG
7
shall assume that the information previously provided by the City is applicable for the then-
current year.
(c)Gathering Spaces and Connectivity. SEG will prioritize and invest in connectivity and
gathering spaces in the development of the District Redevelopment Project. SEG will design
gathering/event/plaza spaces in the District Redevelopment Project (each a “Gathering Space” and
collectively “Gathering Spaces”) to welcome members of the community to downtown Salt Lake City.
The Gathering Spaces, as a component of the District Improvements, shall be subject to certain Design
Guidelines set forth in the Development Agreement. The Gathering Spaces are not intended to be
traditional public forums or limited public forums.
(i) The Gathering Spaces will contain the following: (1) an outdoor event space; (2)
walkways connecting the public streets and rights of way to the District Redevelopment Project;
and (3) landscape features and other elements consistent with a place of gathering. While the
Gathering Spaces are not intended to be traditional public forums or limited public forums for
purposes of expressive activity, the Parties intend for them to be inclusive and welcoming spaces
for individuals and families.
(ii) The City anticipates that SEG will own, operate, and maintain the Gathering
Spaces, and the Gathering Spaces will be open and free of charge to the public, subject to
established and posted hours and SEG or its sub-tenant’s rules pertaining to use of the Gathering
Spaces that are consistent with SEG’s private ownership and operation of the Gathering Spaces
(the “GS Rules & Regulations”). With respect to each Gathering Space, SEG shall provide to
the City a written plan for activation of the Gathering Space and fee schedule for events (including
discounted fees for community group events). SEG shall not interfere with the regular open and
free pedestrian access of the Gathering Spaces. The GS Rules & Regulations shall include a
statement affirming SEG’s support and encouragement of non-discriminatory behavior on the
basis of race, creed, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity and expression, age, or physical or mental ability.
(iii) Following completion of a given Gathering Space and at the request of the City,
SEG shall cooperate with the City’s Department of Public Lands to identify on an annual basis
not less than two (2) mutually acceptable periods of three (3) days each that the City or a
community organization(s) designated by the City and approved by SEG may use the Gathering
Space between May 1 and September 15 of a given calendar year, free of cost but subject to the
GS Rules & Regulations, for festivals or events at the Gathering Space (“Event Days”). Subject
to compliance with the GS Rules & Regulations, the City or the City’s designated community
organization(s) may limit access to portions of the applicable Gathering Space during the Event
Days to facilitate such festivals or events.
(d)Japantown. SEG will use commercially reasonable efforts to coordinate the District
Redevelopment Project with the City’s efforts to facilitate the recognition, revitalization, and/or
redevelopment of the Japantown community located at 100 South and 300 West (“Japantown”). To this
end, SEG will continue its efforts to meet with representatives from Japantown designated by the Japanese
Church of Christ and the Buddhist Temple to inform such Japantown representatives of SEG’s progress
and planning efforts and to receive input from the Japantown representatives regarding the Japantown
representative’s efforts to revitalize and/or redevelop Japantown. For thirty-six (36) months after the
Effective Date, such meetings will occur no less often than twice per year. The City also agrees that it
shall expend not less than Five Million and 00/100 Dollars ($5,000,000.00) of funds from Public Benefits
Account in revitalization and redevelopment of Japantown. SEG’s design of the District Redevelopment
Project will prioritize the following for incorporation into the District Improvements:
8
(i) Seek to activate the north side of 100 South in Japantown, including
consideration of street facing activated spaces and exercise commercially reasonable efforts to
minimizing the number of truck loading or unloading areas along 100 South and facing
Japantown.
(ii) Create a pedestrian connection between the interior of the District
Redevelopment Project and Japantown, including the goal of providing a spatial buffer for the
Japanese Church of Christ and the installation of Japanese landscape elements.
(iii) Use commercially reasonable efforts to incorporate Japanese architectural or
landscaping elements in the 100 South ground level facades facing Japantown when consistent
with SEG’s tenant mix in such buildings.
(iv) Work with the Japanese American community to develop a reasonable number
of historical markers that relate to Japantown’s history, which content will be approved by the
Japanese American community. SEG will approve the content and location of the historical
markers, if such historical markers are installed on SEG-owned or controlled property. The
historical markers will be installed and fabricated by SEG using funds from the Public Benefits
Account.
(e)Public Safety Infrastructure. SEG shall provide a space within the District
Redevelopment Project with a maximum total footprint of 1,000 square feet for use by security personnel
and law enforcement, including for the processing and holding of arrestees. SEG will submit the functional
design elements of such space to the Salt Lake City Chief of Police for review and endeavor to incorporate
the Chief of Police’s functional design suggestions into the final plans for such space. On an event-by-
event basis, SEG shall set aside a reasonable number of parking spaces for law enforcement vehicles
within the SEG Property at no cost to the City.
(f)Public Art. The City agrees that a minimum of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00) from
the Public Benefits Account will be spent on the procurement of, design, fabrication, installation, and
maintenance of various pieces of public art, including iconic art, in the District Redevelopment Project.
With respect to any public art to be installed within the District Redevelopment Project, the City and SEG
will establish a public art commission process which will include the review and recommendations of the
Salt Lake City Arts Council. The procurement process for selecting artists to create public art within the
District Redevelopment Project will include a process for notifying and engaging with local artists to
compete for the opportunity to create the public art. Any such public art shall be subject to the joint
approval of SEG and the City as to theme, content and placement within the District Redevelopment
Project.
(g)Maintenance and Programming. SEG will provide for ongoing maintenance of the
improvements installed in connection with the District Redevelopment Project pursuant to the
requirements of a declaration of commercial owners applicable to the District Redevelopment Project as
more fully set forth in the Development Agreement, including provisions for the assessment of the
applicable owners for maintenance of any elements to be commonly maintained and the programmingof
such common areas. The Parties acknowledge that the existing garden adjacent to Japantown is owned
and maintained by Salt Lake County and that arrangements pertaining to the future maintenance of the
garden shall be determined by separate agreement with Salt Lake County.
9
ARTICLE IV
BONDS, ELIGIBLE EXPENSES, FINANCING AND OTHER METHODS FOR REIMBURSING
COSTS
4.1 Bonds. The Parties have determined that, in lieu of SEG receiving direct payments or
reimbursements of Eligible Expenses from the Revitalization Sales Tax, the District Redevelopment Project will
be best facilitated if the State of Utah (the “State”), the City, a community reinvestment agency, or subsidiary of
the City or the State, an independent special or public infrastructure district, or a national finance entity, lawfully
organized and permitted to issue (collectively referred to herein as a “Bond Issuer”) one or more public bonds or
other types of debt (“Bonds”) the proceeds of which shall be used to fund or reimburse, according to the Bond
documents, SEG for the payment of Eligible Expenses, and use the portion of the Revitalization Sales Tax funds
that would otherwise be available to SEG to pay the cost of issuance, principal and interest on such Bonds,
stabilization funds and/or other funding or reserve requirements under the applicable Bond documents
(collectively, the “Debt Service”); provided, however, stabilization funds and/or other funding or reserve
requirements under the applicable Bond documents may be initially funded from Bond proceeds if there are
insufficient Revitalization Sales Tax proceeds available at the time of Bond issuance, subject to reimbursement as
an Eligible Expense when such Revitalization Sales Tax funds are available. Prior to any Bond issuance, SEG
shall review the proposed terms of the bond offering with the City (but not approval), which review shall include
a description of the Eligible Expenses to be financed, the expected completion date of the District Redevelopment
Project being financed, the maximum principal amount of the Bonds, the maximum interest rate to be borne by
the Bonds, the anticipated debt service on the Bonds and an expected draw schedule for the Bond proceeds. SEG
will use commercially reasonable efforts to secure Bond financing at the best rates and terms available to SEG
given the issuer of such Bonds and market conditions at the time of issuance and ensure that: (1) any Bonds issued
for the Eligible Expenses will be tax-exempt for qualifying Eligible Expenses; and (2) the net effective interest
rate on all fixed-rate Bonds will not exceed 10% and 18% for variable rate Bonds. SEG shall provide to the City
complete copies of any draw/payment requests submitted by SEG for Eligible Expenses to the trustee or other
administrative agent for any Bonds such that the City shall have a contemporaneous record of Eligible Expenses
incurred by SEG and with respect to which SEG seeks reimbursement under the Bonds. The Parties agree to
evaluate and, where financially feasible, explore the creation of financial mechanisms that may be, or become,
available in the future, and consider the appropriateness of issuing Bonds to the extent such actions will facilitate
completion of the District Redevelopment Project in accordance with this Agreement and the Project Area Master
Plan. Bonds may be issued for Eligible Expenses in connection with the District Redevelopment Project. The City,
or any Bond Issuer affiliated with the City, shall consider requests to issue Bonds but is under no obligation to
issue any Bonds. The issuance of Bonds may require certain statutory public notices and procedures, and financial
viability. Failure by the City or a Bond Issuer affiliated with the City to issue Bonds is not a breach of this
Agreement and there shall be no liability whatsoever to the City, or any Bond Issuer, or any of their officers,
directors, employees, agents, or contractors because Bonds are not issued by the City or a Bond Issuer. To promote
(i) the efficient and best terms of Bonds/reduction of Debt Service and (ii) the expeditious completion and benefits
of the District Redevelopment Project, the Parties hereby agree that upon agreeing to a capital budgeting plan, that
notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the remedies and rights of the City to reduce or otherwise
adversely impact the pledge of the Revitalization Sales Tax to Debt Service under this Agreement or the CCR Act
other than Administrative Expenses (as defined herein) shall be subordinated to such pledge for the benefit of the
Bonds and its bondholders.
4.2 Eligible Expenses. Pursuant to the CCR Act, the City may not provide and SEG may not
receive from the City a direct subsidy. Accordingly, SEG and the City agree that SEG may only receive funds
generated pursuant to the Revitalization Sales Tax for Eligible Expenses incurred by SEG with respect to the
District Redevelopment Project, including Debt Service.
4.3 Maximum Dollar Amount. The maximum amount of net Bond proceeds that SEG may receive
pursuant to Bonds is Nine Hundred Million and 00/100 Dollars ($900,000,000.00), whether issued in one or
multiple Bonds and which amount SEG shall use solely for payment of Eligible Expenses incurred in completion
of the District Redevelopment Project. The maximum amount of the Revitalization Sales Tax that may be used
for the District Redevelopment Project or for the benefit of SEG pursuant to the CCR Act shall be an amount
10
equal to the Debt Service (the “Maximum Dollar Amount”), which Maximum Dollar Amount shall be paid by
the City from the Revitalization Sales Tax collected by the City throughout the Revitalization Sales Tax Period,
to assist SEG in completing the District Redevelopment Project. The Parties presently anticipate that SEG will
incur approximately Five Hundred Twenty-Five Million and 00/100 Dollars ($525,000,000.00) of Eligible
Expenses for completion of the Arena Renovation and the remaining approximately Three Hundred Seventy-Five
Million and 00/100 Dollars ($375,000,000.00) will be incurred for Eligible Expenses incurred in connection with
completion of the District Improvements. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the foregoing allocation is an
estimate only and that the actual allocation of Eligible Expenses between the Arena Renovation and District
Improvements may change in connection with the completion of the District Redevelopment Project.
4.4 Administrative Fee. Pursuant to the CCR Act, that the City will receive an administrative fee
in an amount not to exceed the amount allowed by the CCR Act (the “Administrative Fee”), which
Administrative Fee shall be deducted from the Revitalization Sales Tax received by the City but will not reduce
the Maximum Dollar Amount.
4.5 Other Financing. The Parties are considering various ways to finance and refinance the
development, construction, installation, repair, maintenance, remodeling, replacement and potential expansionof
the improvements to be installed within the SEG Property, which may be used separately or in combination,
including:
(a)Private Financing Pledge. SEG may obtain private financing of the District Redevelopment
Project and/or such other infrastructure and other development as will assist SEG and its affiliates in the
development of SEG Property. To facilitate the ability of SEG to obtain more favorable terms and conditions for
such private financing, SEG is authorized to pledge as security its right to receive a portion of the Revitalization
Sales Tax, if available and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, to lenders and others in
connection with such financing. Upon SEG’s request, the City hereby agrees at such time to pledge or join in the
pledge, as additional security to such private lender(s), the portion of the Revitalization Sales Tax, if any is then
available, to which SEG is entitled to receive directly pursuant to this Agreement.
(b)Public Debt. Without limiting the City’s discretion under Section 4.1, at SEG’s request, the
City or a Bond Issuer may agree to issue C-PACE bonds or assignable liens, lease revenue bonds or a similar debt
instrument and retain the Revitalization Sales Tax to make payments to the applicable Bond issuer (including a
different but otherwise eligible Bond Issuer as the case may be) sufficient to cover the Debt Service for such
Bonds. The City agrees to reasonably cooperate with a public debt financing plan whereby all or a portion the
Revitalization Sales Tax available for the payment of Eligible Expenses is pledged directly to a Bond Issuer. For
clarity, nothing in this Agreement is intended to prevent SEG from accessing additional financing utilizing public
or private assets or revenues other than the Revitalization Sales Tax.
(c)Assignability of Reimbursement Rights. From time to time, for financing, refinancing,
security or other purposes SEG may assign to the holders of any Bonds or private financing instruments, or their
designees, SEG’s right, in whole or in part, to be reimbursed by the City hereunder for Eligible Expenses incurred
by SEG. If SEG assigns any such right(s), SEG shall promptly notify the City of such assignment, and provide to
the City a copy of such assignment, and thereafter the City shall be authorized to deal directly with the assignee of
such right(s) in connection with such reimbursement.
ARTICLE V
REPORTING, COMPLIANCE & MONITORING
5.1 Reporting.
(a) Within 90 days of the Effective Date SEG will appoint a liaison (the “Liaison”) to provide
leadership and communication with the City, the Revitalization Zone Committee as established pursuant
to the CCR Act, and the public, at approximately six (6) month intervals on the implementation
11
and monitoring of this Agreement, Revitalization Sales Tax committed or spent on Eligible Expenses,
phasing of the construction of the District Redevelopment Project, compliance with the Development
Agreement, and the status of the Public Benefits.
(b) An officer of SEG will also attend at least one City Council meeting per year to provide
a public briefing to the City Council and members of the public on the design, construction, and operation
of the District Redevelopment Project.
(c) From time to time upon request of the City, and no less often than twice annually, the
Liaison shall furnish the City with a report outlining:
(i) a summary of the projects that are currently underway or planned in relation to
the District Redevelopment Project;
(ii) an accounting of all Revitalization Sales Tax proceeds received by SEG or paid
to date for the benefit of SEG in connection with the District Redevelopment Project, as well as
the incremental amount of funds received by SEG or paid for the benefit of SEG since the last
report;
(iii) a summary of the Public Benefit Ticket Fee assessed and/or collected by SEG,
including an opportunity, from time to time, for the City’s Chief Financial Officer to review
additional information on a confidential basis related to the assessment and collection of the
Public Benefit Ticket Fee; and
(iv) the current status and estimated construction schedule for the District
Redevelopment Project.
(d) At the request of the City, the Liaison shall attend any Executive Appropriations
Committee meeting of the Legislature at which the City is requested to provide information concerning
the District Redevelopment Project.
(e) Each year during the Revitalization Sales Tax Period, on or before the anniversary of the
Effective Date, SEG shall provide to the City a written report outlining SEG’s compliance with this
Agreement (“Annual Report”) and the City shall report on use of the funds in the Public Benefits Account
for the prior year. The Annual Report will be a public document and will specifically address each of
SEG’s obligations under this Agreement and will identify any programs created pursuant to this
Agreement. The Annual Report shall include, without limitation:
(i) The status of design and construction of any Gathering Space;
(ii) The status of the workforce development and community support initiatives
required under this Agreement; and
(iii) The number of public outreach events conducted pursuant to Section 3.3(b).
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO PAYMENT
The City’s obligation to pay any monies to SEG or on SEG’s behalf pursuant to this Agreement is
conditioned upon the following (the “Conditions Precedent”):
12
6.1 The City’s Receipt of Funds. The City’s actual receipt of Revitalization Sales Tax funds and,
provided further, that the City’s ability to pay is not reduced, curtailed or limited in any way as a result of any
cause outside the control of the City, including, without limitation, any lawful enactment, initiative, referendum
or judicial decree. The City hereby agrees that all Revitalization Sales Tax collected before SEG incurs Eligible
Expenses or amounts pledged pursuant hereto are due with respect to any Bond or Debt Service shall be held and
maintained by the City in a separate City-managed account for future payment of Debt Service or reimbursement
of Eligible Expenses incurred by SEG. Interest earned in such City-managed account shall also be used for future
payment of Debt Service or reimbursement of Eligible Expenses incurred by SEG. The City will timely release
Revitalization Sales Tax collected in accordance with the requirements of the applicable Bond documents, or with
respect to a direct payment to SEG for Eligible Expenses, upon SEG’s completion of the applicable conditions to
receive such payment under this Agreement.
6.2 Eligible Expenses. In connection with direct payment to SEG for Eligible Expenses incurred by
SEG, the City’s receipt of sufficient written evidence, as reasonably determined by the City pursuant to the
requirements of this Agreement, that SEG has Eligible Expenses and has met the applicable conditions to receive
such payment under this Agreement. The determination of Eligible Expenses in connection with the distribution
of Bond proceeds shall be made pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Bond documents and will not
require approval of the City; provided, however, SEG shall provide to the City complete copies of any
draw/payment requests submitted by SEG for Eligible Expenses to the trustee or other administrative agent for
any Bonds such that the City shall have a contemporaneous record of Eligible Expenses incurred by SEG and with
respect to which SEG seeks reimbursement under the applicable Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, SEG
agrees to not expend the Revitalization Sales Tax, or bond proceeds secured by the Revitalization Sales Tax, on
hard costs for the District Improvements (other than the Arena Redevelopment) until the Development Agreement
is executed and the Design Guidelines are finalized.
6.3 Maximum Dollar Amount. Total reimbursements for Eligible Expenses previously paid to SEG,
together with Revitalization Sales Tax funds that have been pledged or otherwise reserved for Debt Service shall
not have exceeded the Maximum Dollar Amount. For purposes of clarity, the foregoing limitation speaks to
Revitalization Sales Tax funds only. SEG may receive interest earned on Bond proceeds held in reserve or other
similar accounts, or other sources of public funding or reimbursement from federal, state or local government
agencies in connection with the development of the District Redevelopment Project including, without limitation,
tax increment, sales tax rebates, grants or other similar funds; provided that, in each case, such public funding or
reimbursement shall be provided to SEG in accordance with applicable law and subject to such public approval
processes as are required in connection with any such public funding or reimbursement.
ARTICLE VII
RESERVED
ARTICLE VIII
SEG OBLIGATIONS
8.1 District Redevelopment Project; Plans and Specifications. Subject to Section 8.5, SEG shall use
commercially reasonable efforts to develop the District Redevelopment Project substantially in accordance with
the District Redevelopment Conceptual Plan and the Design Guidelines set forth in the Development Agreement.
The Parties acknowledge that the District Redevelopment Conceptual Plan is a conceptual/illustrative depiction of
the presently anticipated development plan and design for the Arena Renovation and District Improvements, which
District Redevelopment Conceptual Plan may be modified from time-to-time by SEG to respond to market,
engineering and other development objectives; provided, however, that Arena Renovation shall in all events meet
the minimum standards set forth therein, which minimum standards are hereby determined by the City to be the
“requirements” the Agreement is required to impose for purposes of the CCR Act.
13
8.2 Arena Operations. SEG agrees that throughout the Revitalization Sales Tax Period, the
Renovated Arena will be operated and maintained consistent with the operational standards required pursuant to
the NBA and NHL league requirements and standards (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from
time-to-time, the “Arena Operational Standards”). The Parties acknowledge that the Arena Operational
Standards represent SEG’s initial effort to set forth the operational standards for the Renovated Arena and that at
the Arena Operational Standards may be modified from time-to-time by SEG to respond to market and operational
conditions, provided, however, that no modification can impair the City’s rights or SEG’s obligations under this
Agreement, including the Home Game Covenant.
8.3 Cost of Construction. Other than the reimbursements or issuance of Bonds and payment of Debt
Service contemplated by this Agreement, the cost of developing, redeveloping, and constructing or otherwise
completing the District Redevelopment Project and all other costs related thereto shall be borne by SEG or others
and the City shall not have responsibility for any such costs, except to the extent the City agrees to participate in
such costs pursuant to other separate written agreements.
8.4 Payment of Taxes, Fees and Assessments. SEG, or its successors or assigns, shall pay or to
cause to be paid in a timely manner all real property taxes, other taxes, fees, and assessments levied or imposed
on such SEG Property, and any personal property owned by SEG and located in the SEG Property; provided,
however, that SEG shall have the right to protest or appeal the amount of assessed taxable value levied against its
property by the Salt Lake County Assessor, State Tax Commission or any lawful entity authorized by law to
determine the assessed taxable value against such property or any portion thereof in the same manner as any other
taxpayer as provided by law, so long as the property taxes are paid under protest and subject to any limitations
thereon set forth in any Bonds for which the State, the City, or a Bond Issuer, is the issuing entity. SEG shall,
however, notify the City in writing within thirty (30) calendar days after such SEG filing of any protest or appeal
to such assessment determination which could impact the taxable value of such property, and provide copies to
the City of any protest or appeal of such assessment and information submitted as part of the protest or appeal. In
addition, SEG shall give the City written notice at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date on which such
protest or appeal is to be heard. The City shall have the right, without objection by SEG, to appear at the time and
date of such protest or appeal and to present oral or written information or evidence in support of or objection to
the amount of assessment which should or should not be assessed against such property and the amount of the
Project Area Bonds, indebtedness, or outstanding obligations.
8.5 Timing and Development of SEG Property. The Parties acknowledge that the efficient and
economically viable development and operation of the SEG Property depends on numerous factors, such as
permitting, market orientation and demand, interest rates, event and game schedules, competition and other
factors. SEG may in its discretion develop the SEG Property and/or otherwise complete the District
Redevelopment Project in phases. The timing, sequencing, relative size and phasing of development of District
Redevelopment Project shall be as determined by SEG in its sole subjective business judgment and discretion.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, SEG agrees that in all events: (i) SEG shall complete and make operational all
elements of the District Redevelopment Project for which SEG will incur Eligible Expenses to be reimbursed or
otherwise funded pursuant to this Agreement no later than the ten-year anniversary of the Effective Date; (ii) the
Arena Renovation shall be the first project commenced pursuant to this Agreement and SEG will endeavor to
prioritize completion of District Improvements containing those Public Benefits that are to be actually
incorporated into the construction of the District Redevelopment Project over those that do not; and (iii) the Public
Benefits that are incorporated into the construction of the District Redevelopment Project shall, where possible,
be completed contemporaneously with the completion of the applicable portion of the District Redevelopment
Project. In developing the District Redevelopment Project, SEG shall comply with the requirements of this
Agreement and applicable law. In determining the phasing of the construction of the District Redevelopment
Project, SEG will use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that construction of the Gathering Spaces and
public safety space is prioritized in early phases, as such Public Benefits are a material reason for the City’s
execution of this Agreement and imposition of the Revitalization Sales Tax.
14
8.6 Property Ownership. Subject to Article XII, throughout the Revitalization Sales Tax Period,
SEG or one of its Affiliates shall be the sole ground lessee of the SEG Property. In the event SEG or such Affiliate
desires to transfer any portion of the SEG Property to a third party that is not an Affiliate of SEG, such transfer
shall be subject to the prior written consent of the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided that
such third party shall adopt all of the obligations and liabilities of SEG, including any associated Public Benefit
obligations, applicable to such portion of the SEG Property, as reasonably determined by the City. For purposes
of clarity, the foregoing requirements shall not be deemed to prevent any sub-leasing or joint-venture with respect
to portions of the SEG Property to residential, commercial, retail or other tenants or joint-venture partners, which
sub-leasing and joint-venture arrangements are expressly contemplated by the Parties and expressly permitted by
the City hereunder.
8.7 [Reserved]
8.8 Required Insurance. In order to limit the Parties’ liability related to third-party claims, SEG,
and any contractor it retains for the construction of the District Redevelopment Project, shall obtain and maintain
through completion of the applicable project, customary insurance, including workers compensation insurancein
statutory amounts, employer’s liability, commercial or general liability, and builders risk.
8.9 League Rules. The obligations hereunder of SEG and its Affiliates that own the NBA franchise,
the NHL franchise or the Renovated Arena (or direct or indirect interests therein) are subject to all applicable
NBA rules and regulations and NHL rules and regulations, including the receipt of any necessary NBA and/or NHL
approvals.
ARTICLE IX
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE CITY
The City makes the following representations and warranties for the benefit of each of SEG and their
successors and assigns:
9.1 Approvals. All necessary approvals, authorizations and consents have been obtained in
connection with the execution by the City of this Agreement, and with the performance by the City of the City’s
obligations under this Agreement. The execution of this Agreement by the City and the performance by the City
of the City’s obligations under this Agreement do not require the consent of any third party that has not been
obtained.
9.2 Authorization. The City is a public entity, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of the State of Utah and has been duly and validly authorized to enter into this Agreement. The
person or persons executing and delivering this Agreement on behalf of the City have been duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Agreement and to take such other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. All requisite action has been taken to make this
Agreement valid and binding on the City.
ARTICLE X
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SEG
SEG makes the following representations and warranties on its own behalf for the benefit of the City:
10.1 Approvals. Subject to Section 8.9, all necessary approvals, authorizations and consents have
been obtained in connection with the execution by SEG of this Agreement, and with the performance by SEG of
its obligations under this Agreement. The execution of this Agreement by SEG and the performance by SEG of
its obligations under this Agreement do not require the consent of any third party that has not been obtained. SEG
15
will use commercially reasonable efforts to execute on or before July 1, 2025, a binding lease agreement with Salt
Lake County for the property owned by Salt Lake County, identified as the two blocks east of the Arena, and
generally known as the “Salt Palace”, on which SEG intends to construct the District Improvements.
10.2 Authorization. SEG is a properly created entity, duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, qualified to do business in the State of Utah, and has been duly
and validly authorized to enter into this Agreement. The person or persons executing and delivering this
Agreement on behalf of SEG has been duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement and to take such
other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
All requisite action has been taken to make this Agreement valid and binding on SEG.
10.3 Major League Franchisee. SEG has a controlling interest in major league sports franchisesfor
both the NBA and the NHL.
10.4 No Violation. Neither the entry into nor the performance of this Agreement by SEG will
violate, conflict with, result in a breach under, or constitute a default under, any corporate charter, certificate of
incorporation, by-law, partnership agreement, limited liability company agreement, indenture, contract,
agreement, permit, judgment, decree, or order to company agreement, indenture, contract, agreement, permit,
judgment, decree, or order to which SEG is a party or by which SEG is bound.
10.5 No Judgments. There are no judgments, orders or decrees of any kind against SEG that are
unpaid or unsatisfied of record or any legal action, suit, or other legal or administrative proceeding pending,
threatened, or reasonably anticipated which could be filed before any court or administrative agency which has.
or is likely to have, a material adverse effect on the ability of SEG to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
10.6 No Bankruptcy. SEG has not filed any petition seeking or acquiescing in any reorganization,
arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under any law relating to
bankruptcy or insolvency, nor has any such petition been filed against SEG. No general assignment of SEG’s
assets has been made for the benefit of creditors, and no receiver, master, liquidator, or trustee has been appointed
for SEG or any of its assets. SEG is not insolvent and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement shall not render SEG insolvent.
ARTICLE XI
DISPUTE RESOLUTION; DEFAULT; REMEDIES
11.1 Mediation. In the event there is any dispute arising under or relating in any way to this Agreement
that cannot be resolved by agreement between the Parties, either Party may submit the dispute to non-binding
mediation by notifying the other Party in writing that a controversy has arisen. If a Party notifies (“Notifying
Party”) in writing (“Notice”) the other Party of a controversy that arises out of or relates in any way to this
Agreement, including, but not limited to the breach thereof (“Controversy”), then within five (5) business days
thereafter each Party shall notify the other the Party whom they designate to negotiate a resolution of the
Controversy (collectively “Designated Persons”). The Notice shall provide a reasonable description of the
matters that are in Controversy and documentation supporting the Notifying Party’s position. Before initiating the
Proceedings (defined below) the Designated Persons shall thereafter negotiate to resolve the Controversy. If they
are not able to resolve the Controversy within twenty (20) business days thereafter, or the Notifying Party does
not receive a response from the other Party within twenty days after the Notice is sent, then negotiations shall be
deemed terminated and the Parties may proceed with arbitration as provided herein. MEDIATION SHALL BE A
CONDITION PRECEDENT TO THE INITIATION OF ARBITRATION. ARBITRATION MUST BE
COMMENCED WITHIN TWO YEARS FROM THE FIRST DAY OF THE MEDIATION REFERENCED
ABOVE OR ALL CLAIMS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RELATED THERETO SHALL BE WAIVED
FOREVER. If either Party commences an arbitration to adjudicate any dispute without first submitting the dispute
to mediation, the other Party will be entitled to obtain an order dismissing the arbitration without prejudice.
16
11.2 Arbitration. Except for those matters resolved pursuant to mediation as outlined above, the
Parties may not commence any litigation or file a claim in any court of competent jurisdiction without first
submitting the dispute arising in connection with this Agreement (including any questions regarding the existence,
scope, validity, breach or termination of this Agreement) to a non-binding arbitration process administered by an
independent Arbitrator selected in accordance with Section 11.3 below (the “Proceedings”).
11.3 Selection of Arbitrator. An arbitral tribunal of one arbitrator (the “Arbitrator”) shall be
established in conformity with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association (the
“Rules”) in effect at the time such arbitration is commenced. In the event a dispute exists that requires resolution
by arbitration, the complaining Party shall give written notice to the other Party that a dispute requiring resolution
by an Arbitrator under the terms of this Agreement exists, BUT ONLY IF SUCH CLAIM HAS BEEN
MEDIATED PURSUANT TO SECTION 11.1 ABOVE AND NOT OTHERWISE WAIVED. Within thirty (30)
days following delivery of such notice, the Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to agree upon an
Arbitrator for the dispute in question. The Arbitrator shall have: (i) practiced law for at least 15 years, (ii) be
currently licensed to practice law in the State of Utah, and (iii) have familiarity with the law applicable to the
issues raised in this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to agree upon an Arbitrator during such thirty (30) day
period, each Party shall have fifteen (15) days to select an Arbitrator. If a Party fails to make its respective selection
of an Arbitrator within the fifteen (15) day period described above, then the other Party’s selection shall be
appointed to act as the Arbitrator. If no Arbitrators are selected, then the Utah office of the American Arbitration
Association shall appoint an Arbitrator. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any Party, in
its sole discretion, may waive any of the Arbitrator requirements and permit an individual proposed by another
Party who does not meet some or all of the Arbitrator requirements to serve as the Arbitrator. In rendering a
decision under this Agreement, the Arbitrator shall take into account the standards and other applicable provisions
of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the Arbitrator shall have the power to order equitable remedies, including
specific performance and injunctive relief.
11.4 Arbitration Process. The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Rules. Any
arbitration shall take place in Salt Lake City, Utah. The arbitrators shall apply the substantive law of Utah
(exclusive of choice of law principles) in resolving the dispute. Issues relating to the conduct of the arbitration
and enforcement of any award shall be governed by the Utah Uniform Arbitration Act, U.C.A. § 78B-11-101 et
seq. (as amended or superseded from time to time, the “Arbitration Act”) shall apply to the Proceedings. In the
event of a conflict between the arbitration terms of this Agreement and the Arbitration Act, the terms set forth
herein shall control, and the Parties hereby waive or otherwise agree to vary the effect of all requirements of the
Arbitration Act that may conflict with or vary from arbitration terms of this Agreement. No Party to any dispute
shall be required to join any other Person as a Party to the dispute pursuant to the arbitration provisions set forth
in herein. In the Proceedings, unless agreed to by all Parties, or good cause shown to the Arbitrator, discovery
shall be limited to the following: (a) each Party is limited to ten (10) interrogatories and ten (10) requests for
production of documents; (b) each Party may take a total of up to fifteen (15) hours of depositions; the length of
time of each deposition shall not exceed seven (7) hours for a Party witness, and four (4) hours for a non-Party
witness; (c) sixty (60) days before the initial hearing, each Party who bears the burden of establishing a claim or
defense shall serve his/her/its initial expert witness report(s) (“Initial Report”) to the other Party setting forth
each expert’s opinions and the reasons for them. The substance of each expert’s direct testimony must fairly and
reasonably be addressed in the expert’s report. Within thirty (30) days after service of the Initial Report the opposing
Party shall serve his/her/its rebuttal expert witness reports. The rebuttal expert reports shall set forth each expert’s
opinions and the reasons for them. The substance of each rebuttal expert’s direct testimony must fairly and
reasonably be addressed in the expert’sreport.
11.5 Decision of Arbitrator. The Arbitrator shall notify the Parties in writing of its decision within
sixty (60) days from the date the Arbitrator has heard and received all evidence from the Parties, or such other
period as both Parties and the Arbitrator may all collectively agree upon in writing. The Arbitrator’s award
(“Award”) shall be a standard form of award pursuant to the Rules. The Arbitrator’s monetary Award will in no
event award punitive or exemplary damages of any kind. Unless the Arbitrator determines otherwise, each Party
17
to an arbitration proceeding shall be responsible for all fees and expenses of such Party’s attorneys, witnesses, and
other representatives, and one-half of the other fees and expenses of the Arbitrator and the other costs of the
arbitration shall be allocated to and paid by (a) the Party or Parties initiating the respective arbitration proceeding,
and (b) the Party or Parties against whom the respective arbitration proceeding is brought. Any monetary award
shall be in dollars of the United States of America. The Award rendered in any arbitration commenced under this
Agreement shall not be binding upon the Parties unless each Party agrees thereto in writing, whereupon each Party
shall be such written agreement waive any claim or appeal whatsoever against it or any defense against its
enforcement. Except for an Award accepted by the Parties in writing, and to the extent permitted by law including
the City’s obligations under the Utah Government Records Access and Management Act (“GRAMA”), the Parties
shall keep confidential the Proceedings, including all discovery performed therein that was not otherwise
originally in the Party’s possession or in the public domain.
11.6 Mutual Obligation to Arbitrate. The obligation to arbitrate as set forth herein is binding on each
of the Parties, and their successors and assigns. For purposes of appointing Qualified Persons to appoint the
Arbitrator, each Party and its successors and assigns shall jointly appoint such Party’s appointer.
11.7 Contractual Obligations During Arbitration. Until such time as a final determination of any
dispute is obtained pursuant to the terms herein provided or a judicial proceeding, and notwithstanding any
termination of or default under or alleged termination of or default under this Agreement, all Parties involved in
such dispute shall remain liable for, and shall be required to continue to satisfy, their respective obligations under
this Agreement.
11.8 Default; Remedies.
(a)Default. The Parties agree that City would not have agreed to adopt the Revitalization
Sales Tax and execute this Agreement but for SEG’s commitment to cause both an NHL and NBA franchises
to have the Renovated Arena serve as the location for both franchises exclusive home arena and SEG’s
agreement to the Home Game Covenant. Requiring both the NBA and NHL franchises to each have their
exclusive home arena at the Renovated Arena provides a unique value to the City, including generating new
jobs, economic development, downtown revitalization, and increased tourism. Accordingly, the continued
utilization of the Arena Redevelopment Property by the NHL and NBA as their exclusive home arena is a
material inducement for the City to execute this Agreement and adopt the Revitalization Sales Tax. For these
and other reasons, the Parties agree that the City shall be entitled to extraordinary remedies in the event SEG
seeks to relocate or cause the relocation, through legislative initiative sought by or supported by SEG or other
direct action, of either the NBA or NHL franchise from the Renovated Arena during the Revitalization Sales
Tax Period. For clarity, it shall be an Event of Default if, during the Revitalization Sales Tax Period, SEG: (i)
actively participates in a decision or series of decisions to cause or permit either the NBA or NHL franchise to
relocate, transfer, or otherwise move the NBA or NHL franchise such that they cease utilizing the Renovated
Arena as its exclusive home arena during the Revitalization Sales Tax Period; or (ii) enters into any contract or
agreement to sell, assign, or otherwise transfer the NBA or NHL franchise to any person or entity who, to the
actual knowledge of SEG’s executive team, intends to relocate, transfer, or otherwise move the NBA or NHL
franchise to a location other than the Renovated Arena during the Revitalization Sales Tax Period; or (iii) solicits
an offer or proposal from, or enters into negotiations or agreements with any person or entity concerning the
relocation of the NBA or NHL franchise if such relocation would occur during the Revitalization Sales Tax
Period (an “SEG Franchise Operating Default”). For clarity, temporary use of an alternative venue for home
games as a result of force majeure or other events rendering the Renovated Arena unavailable will not constitute
an SEG Franchise Operating Default. Moreover, the occurrence of any of the following shall constitute an
“Event of Default” under this Agreement: (i) the failure of either Party to make any payment owing to the other
Party hereunder within ten (10) business days after such receipt of notice from the other Party of such failure,
(ii) subject to off-seasons, events of casualty, force majeure (which includes a strike, lockout, or any type of
work stoppage, league suspension or termination) or City approved periods of remodel or renovation, the failure
of SEG or its successor or assign to operate or cause to be operated a NBA or a NHL franchise at the Renovated
Arena, or (iii) a Party being in breach of, or failing to perform, comply with, or observe any,
18
covenant, warranty, condition, agreement, non-monetary term or undertaking contained in or arising under this
Agreement, and such failure continues for a period of sixty (60) days after written notice thereof is given by the
other Party to breaching Party; provided, however, that if the default cannot reasonably be rectified or cured
within such sixty (60) day period, the default shall be deemed to be rectified or cured if the defaulting Party,
within such sixty (60) day period, shall have commenced to rectify or cure the default and shall thereafter
diligently prosecute same to resolution and completion.
(b)Notices of Default. In the event of a default which with the giving of notice to the other
Party and the passage of time would constitute an Event of Default, as provided in Section 11.8(a), the non-
defaulting Party shall provide written notice of such default to the other Party, which notice shall state with
reasonable specificity the provision this Agreement under which the default is claimed, the nature and character
of such default, the date by which such default must be cured, and the failure of defaulting Party to cure such
default by the date set forth in such notice will result in the non-defaulting Party having the right to pursue its
remedies under this Agreement.
(c)Event of Default Notice. If, after the giving of the written notice(s) to the defaulting Party
provided for in this Section 11.8 and the expiration of the applicable cure period provided for herein, the non-
defaulting Party determines that the defaulting Party has not cured the default of which the defaulting Party was
given notice as required by this Section 11.8, the non-defaulting Party shall give the defaulting Party a notice
of the occurrence of an Event of Default (an “Event of Default Notice”). An Event of Default Notice shall state
which remedy the non-defaulting Party is electing from among the remedies section forth in Section 11.8(d).
(d)Remedies. Should an Event of Default occur pursuant to an Event of Default Notice and
so long as such Event of Default is continuing, then the non-defaulting Party, in addition to any other rights or
remedies such non-defaulting Party may have at law or in equity, but subject to the terms of any subordination
then in effect with respect to Bond debt, and the limitations set forth in Section 11.8, Section 11.9, and Section
13.16, shall have the right to take any or all of the following actions:
(i) In the event of SEG Franchise Operating Default, and if such SEG Franchise
Operating Default is not cured within eighteen (18) months from the last home game of the NBA
or NHL franchise, as applicable, at the Arena Redevelopment Property the City may, at the City’s
election, either: (A) seek specific enforcement of this Agreement, including by injunction; or (B)
cause SEG, subject to the limitations set forth below with respect to a departure of only the NBA
franchise or the NHL franchise, but not both, to repay all outstanding Bonds the proceeds of which
were paid to SEG and that are secured by the Revitalization Sales Tax (“Bond Repayment”). For
purposes of clarity, if a single Bond is issued and only a portion of the proceeds of such Bond are
paid to SEG, SEG’s Bond Payment shall be equal to the outstanding amount of the Bond Payment
multiplied by a percentage equal to the percentage of the Bond proceeds received by SEG at the
time of Bond issuance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the SEG Franchise Operating Default
relates to the removal of the NHL franchise only or the NBA franchise only (but not both), then
the Bond Payment shall not be required and in such event, if the SEG Franchise Operating Default
is not cured within 18 months, then the franchise causing the SEG Franchise Operating Default
shall pay fifty percent (50%) of the Liquidated Damages Amount (defined below). Payment of
any Liquidated Damages Amount, together with the Bond Repayment is referred to herein,
collectively, as the “SEG Repayment Obligation.” In determining the Liquidated Damages, the
Parties agree that this is a reasonable amount in damages, given that a SEG Franchise Operating
Default will result in a reduction in value in the Renovated Area and District Redevelopment
Project; a reduction in economic benefits to downtown Salt Lake City; a reduction in anticipated
Public Benefits; the loss of revenues to Salt Lake City and the State of Utah; a reduction of the
value of taxpayer dollars directly invested in the Renovated Arena and other elements of the
District Redevelopment Project. For purposes of this Agreement, “Liquidated Damages
Amount” shall mean an amount equal to Two Hundred Fifty Million and 00/100 Dollars
($250,000,000.00) for the first fifteen (15) years of the Term,
19
and for each year thereafter, Two Hundred Fifty Million and 00/100 Dollars ($250,000,000.00)
less Sixteen Million Six Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Seven and 00/100
Dollars ($16,666,667.00) for each full year of the Term thereafter until reduced to Zero at the end
of the thirtieth (30th) year of the Term.
(ii) In the event of any other Event of Default, the non-defaulting Party may elect to
enforce by suit any term this Agreement required to be kept or performed by the non-defaulting
Party (including the right and remedy of injunction); and
(iii) Recover from the defaulting Party any amount necessary to compensate the non-
defaulting Party for actual damages proximately caused by the defaulting Party’s failure to
perform its obligations under this Agreement.
(e)Extensions. A non-defaulting Party may in writing extend the time for a defaulting Party’s
performance of any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement or permit the curing of any default upon such
terms and conditions as may be mutually agreeable to the Parties; provided, however, that any such extension or
permissive curing of any particular default shall not operate to release any of the non-defaulting Party’s
obligations, nor constitute a waiver of the non-defaulting Party’s rights, with respect to any other term, covenant,
or condition of this Agreement or any other default in, or breach of, this Agreement.
(f)SEG Repayment Obligation Guaranty. Upon execution of this Agreement, SEG shall
(subject to receipt of any necessary NBA and/or NHL approvals) cause SEG Sports Holdings, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and SEG’s affiliated entity that directly owns the controlling interest in the SEG affiliates
that own the NBA and NHL franchises, to each provide a written guaranty of the Liquidated Damages. The City
has determined that such guaranty constitutes an acceptable guaranty of the Liquidated Damages pursuant to the
CCR Act and that accordingly, no further guaranty or security shall be required with respect to the Liquidated
Damages or the SEG Repayment Obligation.
11.9 No Consequential Damages. NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT TO
THE CONTRARY, IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY FOR
ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
LOSS OF USE OF FACILITIES OR EQUIPMENT, LOST PROFITS, LOST PRODUCTION OR INABILITY TO
PERFORM COLLATERAL CONTRACTS, ALL OF WHICH ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED AND WAIVED.
11.10 No Termination. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement or applicable law to the contrary,
in no event shall an Event of Default on the part of a Party result in the termination of this Agreement, which
remedy the Parties hereby expressly waive. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 11.10 or the
provisions of Section 11.9, except with respect to disputes concerning the payment of money (which may, in
connection with such disputes, be paid under protest and subject to reservation of rights to dispute the obligation
for the payment of same in the first instance), if the asserted default is subject to arbitration (as may be mutually
agreed upon by the Parties), and the existence of such default is being contested by the Party purportedly in default,
if and so long as such Party is cooperating and acting in good faith to complete the arbitration proceeding with
respect thereto as expeditiously as possible, the time for curing such default shall commence upon the rendering
of the arbitration decision with respect thereto, or other resolution thereof, whichever occurs first; provided,
however, if the matter being arbitrated is capable of performance to the extent not in dispute (e.g., the undisputed
portion of monies owing), performance to the extent not in dispute shall be condition precedent to the effectiveness
of this sentence. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement is expressly conditioned upon SEG’s ability to
secure a long-term ground lease from Salt Lake County for the portions of the SEG Property that are currently
owned by Salt Lake County on terms and conditions reasonably acceptable to SEG and consistent with this
Agreement. If SEG is unable to secure such long-term ground lease from Salt Lake County on or before July 1,
2025 (“Termination Event”), this Agreement shall terminate in its entirety and the Parties shall work in good
faith to unwind all commitments and agreements entered into in connection herewith such that neither Party shall
have any continuing rights or obligations hereunder or pursuant to such commitments. Notwithstanding the
20
foregoing, within sixty (60) days after the occurrence of a Termination Event, SEG will repay to the City any
Revitalization Sales Tax SEG has, as of that date, received, as the Parties agree that the Revitalization Sales Tax
was imposed and collected by the City to fund the Eligible Expenses under the CCR Act, and the Termination
Event renders the funding of the Eligible Expenses and the purpose of the CCR Act impossible. The City further
agrees that following a Termination Event it shall take such actions as are required by law to repeal the
Revitalization Sales Tax as soon as reasonably possible following such Termination Event.
ARTICLE XII
ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER
12.1 Assignment and Transfer of Development. Subject to Section 12.3, if SEG assigns, transfers,
or otherwise conveys the entire SEG Property or any portion thereof to a subsequent owner, and intends to transfer
any of the rights and obligations under this Agreement in connection with such transfer, SEG shall execute and
deliver a “Transfer Acknowledgement” in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F for the purpose of advising the
City of such transfer. Upon delivery of a fully executed Transfer Acknowledgement the obligations of SEG
described therein shall automatically be assigned and assumed to the identified assignee, and SEG shall be released
from the obligations that are assumed by the identified assignee. The assignor shall remain responsible for
obligations and liabilities not assumed by the assignee.
12.2 Assignment of Reimbursement Rights. Upon the prior written consent of the City, which may
be withheld in its sole discretion, SEG may assign the right to all payments and reimbursements for Eligible
Expenses incurred with respect to the SEG Property. Any assignment of the right to receive payments and
reimbursements under this Agreement by SEG must be in writing, signed by the Manager or other expressly
authorized signatory of SEG and the City, and must include specific details regarding the right or amount of
reimbursement transferred to a third party.
12.3 Assignment of Property and Franchises. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, SEG
and its Affiliates may sell, assign, transfer or otherwise convey (collectively, “Sell” and any such transaction a
“Sale”) direct or indirect interests in the NBA franchise or the NHL franchise or both (including a controlling
interest therein) or all or any portion of their respective assets or equity interests, so long as (a) the NBA has
approved such Sale (in the case of a Sale involving the NBA franchise) and the NHL has approved such Sale (in
the case of a Sale involving the NHL franchise), as applicable, (b) with respect to a Sale of SEG or substantially
all its assets or that otherwise includes both the NBA franchise and NHL franchise, then SEG shall execute and
deliver a “Transfer Acknowledgement” in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F for the purpose of advising the
City of such Sale pursuant to which the acquiror or assignee assumes all of SEG’s obligations hereunder, and (c)
with respect to a Sale of one of the NBA franchise or the NHL franchise (but not both), then SEG shall execute
and deliver a “Transfer Acknowledgement” in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F for the purpose of advising
the City of such Sale pursuant to which the acquiror or assignee assumes (i) the Home Game Covenant and all
other obligations with respect to the franchise so Sold (and SEG and its Affiliates shall be released from the Home
Game Covenant and all other obligations with respect to such franchise so Sold), (ii) 50% of the SEG Repayment
Obligation, and (iii) 50% of the assignor’s other obligations hereunder. Upon delivery of a fully executed Transfer
Acknowledgement the obligations of SEG and its Affiliates described therein shall automatically be assigned and
assumed to the identified assignee, and SEG and its Affiliates shall be released from the obligations that are so
assumed by the identified assignee. The assignor shall remain responsible for obligations and liabilities not
assumed by the assignee.
ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
13.1 No Personal Liability. No manager, member, shareholder, director, official, employee,
consultant, contractor, agent, subsidiary, or representative of any Party shall be personally liable to the other Party
or any successor in interest in the event of any default or breach by the first Party for any amount that may become
due to the other Party or their respective successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.
21
13.2 Notices. A notice or communication given under this Agreement by any Party to another Party
shall be sufficiently given or delivered if given in writing (a) upon personal delivery to the Party to be notified,
(b) when sent by confirmed electronic mail (or acknowledgement of receipt or reply by the recipient) if sent during
normal business hours of the recipient; if not, then on the next Business Day, or one (1) day after deposit with a
nationally recognized overnight courier, specifying next day delivery, with written verification of receipt. All
communications shall be addressed to such other Party as follows:
If to the City:Salt Lake City Corporation
Attn: Mayor’s Office
451 S. State Street, Room 306
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5474
P.O. Box 145474
with a copy to:Salt Lake City Corporation
City Attorney’s Office
Attn: Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
451 S. State Street, Room, Room 505A
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5474
P.O. Box 145474
If to SEG:Smith Entertainment Group LLC
Attn: General Counsel
1420 S. 500 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84115
Email: legal@utahjazz.com
with a copy to:Parr Brown Gee & Loveless
101 South 200 East, Suite700
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Attention: Robert A. McConnell
Email: rmcconnell@parrbrown.com
Notice to any Party may be addressed in such other commercially reasonable way that such Party may,
from time to time, designate in writing and deliver to the other Parties.
13.3 Term. The term of this Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and continue for thirty
(30) years (“Term”).
13.4 Exhibits/Recitals. All Exhibits to this Agreement and all Recitals are incorporated in this
Agreement and made a part of this Agreement as if set forth in full and are binding upon the Parties to this
Agreement.
13.5 Headings. Any titles of the several parts and sections of this Agreement are inserted for
convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
13.6 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
Parties and their respective successors and assigns. SEG may transfer of all or any part of the SEG Property to
any Affiliate (defined below) of SEG; provided, either such Affiliate has assumed all of the applicable obligations
of SEG hereunder (if any) or SEG will remain responsible for such obligations. Neither SEG’s entry into a joint
venture for the development of all or any part of the SEG Property, nor SEG’s pledging of part or all of the SEG
Property as security for financing shall be deemed to be an “assignment” subject to any approval of the City unless
specifically designated as such in an assignment by SEG. If not a matter of public record, SEG shall endeavorto
22
give the City notice of any event specified in this Section 13.6 within ten (10) days after the event has occurred.
Such notice shall include providing the City with all necessary contact information for the newly responsible party.
SEG shall remain responsible for all obligations of this Agreement in such a transfer to a related entity, joint
venture, or as security for financing except as may be provided in Section 12.2 with respect to the City’s
acceptance of a Transfer Acknowledgement. For purposes of this Agreement, “Affiliate” with respect to any
Person, means any person or entity directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with
such Person.
13.7 Governing Law. This Agreement is intended to be performed in the State of Utah and shall be
interpreted and enforced according to the laws of the State of Utah.
13.8 Invalid Provisions. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or
unenforceable under present or future laws, such provisions shall be fully severable, and the remaining provisions
of this Agreement shall remain in full force. The Parties agree that in the event any Person files or threatens to file
a Claim that all or any portion of this Agreement fails to comply with applicable law, the Parties shall use best and
cooperative efforts to defend against any such Claim, including, but not limited to, pursuit of any legal or
legislative remedy to resolve such Claim in a manner that would preserve the economic allocations set forth in
this Agreement.
13.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by electronic signature and in two (2) or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument. Counterparts may be delivered by electronic mail (including pdf) or other transmission method,
and any counterpart so delivered shall be deemed to have been duly and validly delivered and be valid and effective
for all purposes.
13.10 Time. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
13.11 Complete Agreement; Amendments. This Agreement and its exhibits contain the complete
agreement of the Parties, and supersede all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, representations and
agreements of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be amended or modified
only in writing, executed by the City and SEG. SEG shall not be required to obtain the consent of any subsequent
owner of a portion of the SEG Property in order to amend this Agreement.
13.12 No Recording. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement or as otherwise agreed to by
the Parties in writing, neither this Agreement nor any notice or memorandum of this Agreement may be recorded
in the official records of Salt Lake County; provided, however, that in order to be effective against the City, this
Agreement will be recorded and cataloged in the Office of the Salt Lake City Recorder.
13.13 No Third-Party Rights. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, the obligations of the
Parties set forth in this Agreement shall not create any rights in or obligation to any other persons or third parties,
specifically including, but not limited to subsequent purchasers or lessees of the SEG Property.
13.14 Force Majeure. Any prevention, delay, or stoppage of the performance of any obligation
pursuant to this Agreement which is due to strikes; labor disputes; inability to obtain labor, materials, equipment
or reasonable substitutes therefor; acts of nature; governmental restrictions, regulations or controls; judicial orders;
enemy or hostile government actions; wars; civil commotions; fires, floods, pandemics (including COVID-19),
earthquakes or other casualties; or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the Party obligated to perform
hereunder, shall excuse performance of the obligation by that Party a period equal to duration of that prevention,
delay or stoppage. Any Party seeking relief under the provisions of this Section shall notify the other Party in
writing of a force majeure event within sixty (60) days following occurrence of the claimed event.
23
13.15 Further Actions. The Parties hereby agree to execute and deliver such additional documents
and to take all further actions as may become necessary or desirable to fully carry out the provisions and intent of
this Agreement.
13.16 Limitation of Liability. In no event shall SEG’s liability under this Agreement, whether for
breach, tort, strict liability or otherwise, exceed the amount of any Debt Service related to SEG and the amount
SEG has received from the City by way of reimbursement of Eligible Expenses, plus the costs and expenses
incurred in enforcement of this Agreement. In no event shall the City’s liability under this Agreement, whether
for breach, tort, strict liability or otherwise, exceed the amount of the Eligible Expenses to which SEG was found
to be entitled to under this Agreement, plus costs and expenses incurred in the enforcement of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a conflict between this section and the Section of this Agreement
labeled “Default”, the Section labeled “Default” will prevail.
13.17 Relationship of Parties. The relationship between the Parties is and shall at all times be that of
independent contractors and in no way shall the Parties hereto, in any way or for any purpose, become a partner
of the other Party in the conduct of its/their business, or otherwise, or a member of joint venture or other enterprise
with the other Party. The Parties shall under no circumstances be deemed to be in a relationship of confidence or
trust or a fiduciary relationship with the other Party or owe any fiduciary duty to the other Party.
13.18 Confidentiality. The Parties understand and agree that access to records prepared, owned,
received, or retained by the City is governed by the Utah Governmental Records Access and Management Act
(“GRAMA”), Utah Code Ann. §630-2-101, et seq. SEG may protect the confidentiality of any document,
including, but not limited to, any report or financial documents it supplies to the City pursuant to this Agreement
to the extent allowed by GRAMA if: (a) SEG makes written claim of business confidentiality under GRAMA
prior to submitting the document to the City, and (b) one or more of the exceptions noted in GRAMA apply. SEG
hereby requests notice under Utah Code Ann §63G-2-309(1)(b) of any and all public records requests seeking a
copy of any information covered by a claim of business confidentiality and of any determination by any
governmental agency that such information or any part thereof shall be released to anyone other than SEG. the
City hereby acknowledges that it may not, absent a court order, disclose any information covered by this section
until the exhaustion and expiration of all procedures and appeal periods set forth in GRAMA. Nothing in this
Section 13.18 shall be deemed an acknowledgement or admission that any of the information covered by this
Section 13.18 is or should be subject to any provision of GRAMA, except that Parties acknowledge that this
Agreement, once fully executed and finalized, including the Exhibits, are a public record under GRAMA.
13.19 Mortgagee Protections; Estoppel Certificate.
(a)Mortgages. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit SEG from
encumbering the SEG Property or any estate or interest therein (including this Agreement), or any portion
thereof, or any improvement thereon, in any manner whatsoever by one or more mortgages, deeds of trust,
sale and leaseback, assignments, pledges, and any or other form of secured financing by which any interest
of SEG in the SEG Property is directly or indirectly mortgaged, pledged (including any pledges of a direct
or indirect interest in SEG, or other “mezzanine” or preferred equity loans) (each, a “Mortgage”) with
respect to the construction, development, use or operation of the SEG Property or any part thereof. the
City acknowledges that the lender(s) or prospective lender(s) providing such Mortgages (each, together
with any successor holder of such Mortgage, a (“Mortgagee”) may require certain interpretations and
modifications to this Agreement and the City agrees, upon request, from time to time, to meet with SEG
and representatives of such Mortgagee(s) to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or
modification. the City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any requested interpretation or
modification, provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of
this Agreement.
(b)No Mortgagee Obligations. Notwithstanding any of the provisions of this Agreement to
the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have any obligation or duty pursuant to the terms set forth in this
24
Agreement to perform the obligations of SEG or to guarantee such performance unless and until such
Mortgagee has become the owner in place of SEG and then only to the extent of SEG obligations under
this Agreement.
(c)Default Notices. Any Mortgagee of any Mortgage encumbering the SEG Property, or part
or interest thereof, that has submitted a request in writing to the City in the manner specified herein for
giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from the City of any notice of non-
compliance by SEG in the performance of SEG’s obligations under this Agreement (each, an “Eligible
Mortgagee”). The City simultaneously with providing SEG with a notice (“Default Notice”) of: (i) a
default under this Agreement, or (ii) a matter on which the City may predicate or claim a default, shall
simultaneously provide a written copy of such Default Notice to each Eligible Mortgagee. The Cityshall
have no liability for the failure to provide any such Default Notice, except that no such Default Notice by
SEG shall be deemed effective or to have been duly given unless and until a written copy thereof has been
provided in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement to each Eligible Mortgagee. From
and after the date that such Default Notice has been given to each Eligible Mortgagee, each Eligible
Mortgagee shall have the same period, after the delivery of such Default Notice upon it, plus in each
instance, the additional period of time specified in Section 13.19(d) to cure, commence to cure or cause
to be cured the default(s), acts or omissions which are specified in such Default Notice or if such cure
cannot be effected without possession of the SEG Property, or portion thereof to which the Default Notice
applies, commence a proceeding to obtain such possession. If a cure cannot be effected without
possession, once possession has been obtained, Eligible Mortgagee shall also have the same period for
cure as SEG had after the delivery of such Default Notice. The City shall accept such performance by or
at the instigation of such Eligible Mortgagee(s) as if the same had been done by SEG. The City authorizes
each Eligible Mortgagee to take any such action at such Eligible Mortgagee’s option at any time.
(d)Curative Rights of Mortgagees. In addition to the rights granted to each Eligible
Mortgagee under Section 13.19(c), each Eligible Mortgagee shall have an additional period (“Additional
Cure Period”) of one hundred eighty (180) days to: (i) cure, commence to cure, or cause to be cured any
default of which it receives a Default Notice, or (ii) commence a proceeding to obtain possession of the
SEG Property (or portion thereof on which the Eligible Mortgagee holds an Eligible Mortgage) in the case
of a default that can only be cured once an Eligible Mortgagee obtains possession of the property to which
the Notice of Default applies. The provisions of this Section 13.19(d) shall apply only if an Eligible
Mortgagee:
(i) Notifies the City of Eligible Mortgagee’s desire to cure such default within sixty
(60) days of receipt of the Default Notice;
(ii) On or before the termination of the Additional Cure Period, pays, or causes to be
paid, to the City any amounts (A) then due and in arrears under this Agreement as specified in the
Default Notice to such Eligible Mortgagee, and (B) any amount which becomes due during the
Additional Cure Period as and when due; and
(iii) Cures, or in good faith, with reasonable commercial diligence and continuity,
commences to cure SEG’s non-monetary requirements of this Agreement then in default and
reasonably susceptible of being cured by such Eligible Mortgagee. Notwithstanding this Section
13.19(d), in the event of any non-monetary default under this Agreement, so long as the Eligible
Mortgagee commences efforts to effect a cure and thereafter provides the City reasonable
evidence from time to time, as requested in writing by the City, that the Eligible Mortgagee is
diligently pursuing such efforts, Eligible Mortgagee shall have a commercially reasonable period
of time within which to effect such cure of any such non-monetary default; provided that the
Eligible Mortgagee shall be obligated only to cure SEG’s non-monetary obligations reasonably
capable of being cured by Eligible Mortgagee and which do not require access to the SEG
Property or the use and operation thereof, provided that Eligible Mortgagee shall diligently seek
to acquire such access or such use or operation (either directly or through receivership), and
25
provided further that upon securing such access, use or operation (either directly or through
receivership), Eligible Mortgagee promptly shall commence the cure of any such non-monetary
default and shall prosecute same to completion with all commercially reasonable due diligence.
Any notice to be given by the City to a Mortgagee pursuant to any provision of this Section 13.19(d) shall
be deemed properly addressed if sent to the Mortgagee who served the notice referred to in Section
13.19(c) unless notice of a change of Mortgage ownership has been given to the City in writing.
Nothing in this Section 13.19(d), however, shall be construed to extend this Agreement beyond the Term,
nor to require an Eligible Mortgagee to continue any foreclosure after the default has been cured. If the
default has been cured and the Eligible Mortgagee shall discontinue any foreclosure, this Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect as if SEG had not defaulted under this Agreement. If an Eligible
Mortgagee is complying with this Section 13.19(d), upon the acquisition of SEG Property, or portion
thereof or interest therein, by such Eligible Mortgagee or its designee or any other purchaser at a
foreclosure, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect as if SEG had not defaulted under this
Agreement and the City shall recognize such Eligible Mortgagee or its designee or any other purchaser as
SEG for all purposes under this Agreement.
(e)New Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated as to any portion of the SEG Property
for any reason, including a bankruptcy proceeding of SEG, or if this Agreement is disaffirmed by a
receiver, liquidator, or trustee for SEG or its property, the City, if requested by any Eligible Mortgagee,
shall negotiate in good faith with such Eligible Mortgagee or its designee for a new Tax Sharing and
Reimbursement Agreement for the SEG Property, or portion thereof or interest therein, with the most
senior Eligible Mortgagee requesting such new agreement. Such new agreement shall be for the remainder
of the term of this Agreement, effective as of the date of termination, upon the same terms, covenants and
conditions of this Agreement; provided:
(i) such Eligible Mortgagee shall make written request upon the City for such new
agreement within ninety (90) days after the date that this Agreement is terminated and notice of
such termination is given by the City to the Eligible Mortgagee; and
(ii) such Eligible Mortgagee or such designee shall agree to cure any of SEG’s
defaults of which such Eligible Mortgagee was notified by the City. Any of a SEG’s non-
monetary defaults which are not reasonably capable of being cured shall be deemed waivedwith
respect to a new agreement, provided, the foregoing shall not limit any rights or remedies the City
may have against SEG under this Agreement.
If more than one Eligible Mortgagee shall request a new agreement pursuant to this Section 13.19 (e), the
City shall enter into such new agreement with the Eligible Mortgagee whose Mortgage is prior in lien, or
with the designee of such Eligible Mortgagee. The City, without liability to SEG or any Eligible
Mortgagee with an adverse claim, may rely upon a mortgagee title insurance policy issued by a responsible
title insurance company doing business in the state where the SEG Property is located (which shall be
issued in favor of the City at the sole cost and expense of any such Eligible Mortgagee) as the basis for
determining the appropriate Eligible Mortgagee which is entitled to such newagreement.
(f)Third-Party Beneficiary. Subject to the provisions of this Section 13.19, each Eligible
Mortgagee is an intended third-party beneficiary of the provisions of this Agreement specifically giving
rights to an Eligible Mortgagee. In the event of a conflict between (i) the provisions of this Section 13.19
and (ii) any other provisions of this Agreement, this Section 13.19 will control. Except as set forth in
Section 13.19(e), the City agrees that no Eligible Mortgagee shall in any manner or respect whatsoever
be liable or responsible for any obligations or covenants of SEG under this Agreement (nor shall any
rights of such Eligible Mortgagee be contingent on the satisfaction of such obligations or covenants),
unless and until such Eligible Mortgagee becomes the owner or long term ground lessee of the SEG
Property by foreclosure, sale in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, in which event such Eligible Mortgagee
26
shall remain liable for such obligations and covenants only so long as it remains the owner or long term
ground lessee of the SEG Property and then only to the extent of such SEG’s obligations under this
Agreement.
(g)Estoppel Certificates. At any time, and from time to time, SEG may deliver written notice
to the City, and the City may deliver written notice to SEG, requesting that such Party certify in writing
that, to the knowledge of the certifying Party (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding
obligation of the Parties, (ii) this Agreement has not been amended, or if amended, the identity of each
amendment, (iii) the requesting Party is not then in breach of this Agreement, or if in breach, a description
of each such breach, and (iv) any other factual matters reasonably requested (an “Estoppel Certificate”).
The Mayor or his/her designee shall be authorized to execute, on behalf of the City, any commercially
reasonable Estoppel Certificate requested by SEG which complies with this Section 13.19(g) within
fifteen (15) days after a written request for such Estoppel Certificate. The City’s failure to furnish an
Estoppel Certificate within such fifteen (15) day period shall be conclusively presumed that (A) this
Agreement is in full force and effect without modification in accordance with the terms set forth in the
request; and (B) there are no breaches or defaults on the part of SEG. The City acknowledges that an
Estoppel Certificate may be relied upon by transferees or successors in interest of SEG and by Mortgagees
holding an interest in the SEG Property.
[Signature page follows]
27
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Participation, Tax Sharing and
Reimbursement Agreement as of the Effective Date.
SMITH ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By:
Name:
Title:
SALT LAKE CITY,
a political subdivision and body politic of the State of Utah
By:
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Attest and countersign:
Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office
City Recorder
A- 1
Exhibit A-1
to
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
Project Area Map
A- 2
Exhibit A-2
to
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
General Depiction of SEG Property1
1 To include Arena Redevelopment Property and those portions of the two blocks to the east owned by Salt Lake County
and leased to SEG.
B - 1
Exhibit B
to
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
District Improvements Project Types
As used herein, “District Improvements” means the following improvement types undertaken by SEG in
connection with the development of the SEG Property, all of which, the City, in its sole discretion are an allowable
type of use of funds under Section 63N-3-1303(2)(a)(ii) of the CCR Act and pursuant to this Agreement:
1. The construction, demolition, modification, or realignment of infrastructure or structures within the
Project Area for the purposes of complementing the Arena Renovation, including entertainment and
recreational uses on land within the Project Area.
2. The improvement, demolition, modification, realignment, construction, or restoration of areas within the
SEG Property and other portions of the Project Area for pedestrian and traffic flow and, for aesthetic,
entertainment, recreational and safety purposes.
3. All public roadways, sidewalks, and other related publicly accessible improvements undertaken and
completed by SEG.
4. All public utilities, infrastructure, facilities and improvements associated with all of the uses listed
above.
5. Law enforcement and public security infrastructure.
6. And other similar improvements as approved by the City consistent with the requirements of the CCR
Act.
C - 1
Exhibit C
to
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
Project Area Master Plan
[See attached.]
Overview of Challenges
Infrastructure
The Project Area encompasses numerous infrastructure challenges that will need to be resolved
in the future, spanning public roadway reconstructions to fiber replacement and integration of
new EV chargers. Several of these challenges are improvements that are already planned,
including the reconstruction of West Temple, the Tech Link light rail connectivity project which
plans to establish a new TRAX line and re-route existing lines by activating an existing rail spur
north of the Ballpark station, the Green Loop project that reimagines underutilized rights-of-way
as functional green space in the heart of downtown, a protected bikeway on 100 S and extending
the protected bike lanes on 300 W up to North Temple, a fiber replacement project to increase
speed and reliability at City facilities, and a planned EV charger installation at 300 W and 200 S.
Additional infrastructure challenges and needs will be revealed as plans for redevelopment move
ahead and traffic impacts are better known. The project area encompasses aging infrastructure
that will need to be upsized for increased capacity when redeveloped. The most likely utility
need through redevelopment will be a sewer main extension to relieve a nearby trunk line that is
reaching capacity. There are other potential upsizing needs for sewer, stormwater, and water in
the project area, depending on density of redevelopment. For the area’s roadway needs, 600 W,
200 S, and portions of 100 S rank very low (meaning poorly) on the roadway condition index,
and all but two blocks of the project area are in fair condition or worse. Many traffic signals in
the area are also not at the level of expected accessibility standards. Reconstruction or
oversizing of public improvements installed in connection with the District Redevelopment
Project shall be undertaken by the City except to the extent specifically completed as a project
improvement on the SEG Property.
The City does not have specific plans for EV charging locations and power upgrade needs due to
the high costs of implementing these solutions, but increased demand is anticipated for both.
Any infrastructure or improvements proposed through redevelopment (such as benches, bike
racks, pavers, planters) within City rights of way could also pose a maintenance and/or
operational challenge for the City. The City is not funded for the increased maintenance that
occurs in the downtown area and therefore any increases to maintenance support need to be
included in future City budgets. SEG and the City anticipate that the City shall be solely
responsible for maintenance of all public improvements and amenities typically maintained by
the City in the downtown area without further contribution from SEG.
Economic
The Project will activate the City and bring more residents and visitors into the Project Area,
which is of enormous benefit. However, challenges could also stem from this increased
activation, including dilution of opportunities for current small, local businesses. It is critical that
the Project Area promotes connectivity downtown as a whole rather than competing with the
current business environment. Coordination between SEG and the Downtown Alliance,
downtown community councils, diverse Chambers of Commerce, and other members of the
Central Business District will be critical to the success of this revitalization effort.
Land Use and Public Safety
The land use and public safety issues will be addressed in the respective specific plans as part of
this Master Plan.
PROJECT AREA 30 YEAR PLAN
SEG intends to commence renovation of the Delta Center in 2025 and anticipates
completing the renovation in three phases over the subsequent three (3) years. The
balance of the District Redevelopment Project is intended as a mixed-use development
that may be comprised of such things as lodging, multi-family housing and various
commercial, retail, office, cultural and convention uses and related improvements and
facilities. This portion of the District Redevelopment Project is intended to be developed
in phases commencing as early as 2026 and will use commercially reasonable efforts to
complete the development by the end of 2034, subject to coordination with the County,
joint venture partners, and so on.
After the District Redevelopment Project is completed, the Delta Center and other
privately owned buildings and structures will be maintained by the applicable owners or
operators thereof utilizing operational revenues. Gathering Spaces will be maintained by
such owners or operators or by one or more owners’ associations tasked with such
maintenance and having the power to levy assessments on the applicable owners and
operators for the costs of such maintenance. Such maintenance will continue throughout
the 30 year term of the Agreement.
The 30-year plan for the remainder of the Project Area shall follow the City's applicable
general plans, including various City-wide plans as well as more specific plans such as
the City's Downtown Plan, the Downtown in Motion Plan, and the Redevelopment
Agency's Central Business District Project Area Plan and Block 67 Project Area Plan. The
City plans to continue to follow the established and statutorily required process, as
applicable, for adopting additional future long-range plans impacting the Project Area.
4862-7960-5965, v. 1
D I S T RI C T RE D E VE L OP M EN TP RO J E C T
E S T I M AT E D I N V E S T M E NT A N D T I M E L I NE
2
D I S T R I C T R E D E V E L O P M E N T P RO J E C T
E S T I M AT E DI N V E S T M E N T
Description
Estimated
Allocation of
$900m
Estimated
Timing
Delta Center Renovation $525m 2024-2027
Entertainment District*$375m 2024-2033
Total $900m
*In addition to the estimated $375m allocated from the $900m
towards the entertainment district there will be other private and
public funding partnerships necessary to complete the District
Redevelopment Project.
3
D E LTAC E N T E R A ND E S T I M AT E DI N V E S T M E NT C O S T
Description
Phase 1
2024-2025
Phase 2
2025-2026
Phase 3
2026-2027
Total
Investment
Delta Center Renovation $45m $240m $240m $525m
% of Investment ($900m)5%27%26%58%
The Delta Center will require a major renovation to ensure the long-term viability of hosting an NHL team. The
renovation will make the Delta Center a world class facility for Hockey in addition to enhancing the guest
experience and homecourt advantage that the Jazz have experienced. It is anticipated that the renovation will
take 3 seasons to complete.
4
D E LTAC E N T E R E S T I M AT E D R E NOVAT I O N S C H E D U L E
2024
April 2025 to
October 2025
October 2025 to
April 2026
April 2026 to
October 2026
October 2026 to
April 2027
April 2027 to
October 2027
•Design
•Hockey Lock room
•Equipment
•Additional seating
•Misc prep for major
work starting April
2025
•Demolish and rebuild
seating bowl structure
north end
•Foundation work
•New retractable and
fixed seating north end
•Construct premium
north end
•Construct new
marshalling addition
south end
•Completeconstruction
of new northend
•Complete construction
of new marshalling
addition south end
•Begin parking garage
construction
•Continue enclosure
and shell work on
phase 1 exterior
expansion locations
•Demolish and rebuild
seating bowl structure
south end
•Complete all interior
work at phase 1
exterior expansion
locations
•New retractable and
fixed seating south end
•Construct new south
end premium and
amenity spaces
•Complete parking
garage construction
•Begin foundation and
structure work for
phase 2 exterior
expansion areas.
•Complete construction
of new south end
premium and amenity
space
•Continue enclosure
and shell work at phase
2 exterior expansion
locations
•Complete construction
of new south end
premium and amenity
locations
•Construct new ice floor
•Install new LED center
hung and ribbon
displays
•Complete all NBAand
NHL team
reconstruction
•Complete final
expansion and
remaining concourse
and premium amenity
interior fit-out
5
E NT E R TAI N M E N T D I S T R I C T E S T I M AT E DI N V E S T M E NT C O ST
Description
Phase 1
2024-2028
Phase 2
2028-2033
Total
Investment*
Entertainment District
Development $200m $175m $375m
% of Investment ($900m)22%20%42%
*In addition to the estimated $375m allocated from the $900m towards the Entertainment
District Development there will be additional private and public funding partnerships
necessary to complete the project by 2033.
Note: Upon completion of the District Redevelopment Project, SEG will maintain the
Renovated Arena or District Improvements utilizing operational revenues generated by
the Renovated Arena or the applicable District Improvement and assessments collected
pursuant to one or more project declarations applicable to some or all of the District
Redevelopment Project.
Land Use Plan
The overall purpose of the land use plan is to implement the vision, goals and initiatives
identified in the Downtown Plan (adopted by SLC in 2016). The key achievements of the plan is
to implement the following key moves identified in the downtown plan that are directly related
to this area:
•Cultural Core: support of cultural venues and organizations through investment in
placemaking, promotion, and programs.
•Sports Expansion and Retention: support sports and entertainment as an important
component of the 24-hour city.
Future Land Use Map
The future land use map reflects the vision in the Downtown Plan, including expanding the
central business district to the west and south. For this plan, the future land use map focuses on
the blocks surrounding the arena and includes the Project Area. The future land use map defines
the scale of buildings. Each future land use designation is intended to include a diverse mix of
land uses that are found in Downtown Salt Lake City. For this land use plan, the definition of
each future land use designation incorporates the policies of the Downtown Plan and assumes the
growth of the Central Business District will follow the direction identified.
High-rise Core
Mixed use buildings in areas with no height limit. Buildings may exceed 40 stories.
High-rise Core/Mid-rise Transit Oriented
Mixed use buildings in areas where the high rise core is expanding to the west with buildings.
Zoning changes to support buildings that exceed 40 stories are possible in locations that are on
transit corridors, but most buildings are typically less than 30 stories.
Mid-rise Transit Oriented
mixed use buildings in areas with a height limit that is less than 25 storied. Taller buildings may
be appropriate when located near multiple transit lines, in areas with a concentration of amenities
like parks, retail, restaurants, and entertainment venues.
The goals of the Project Area are found in the Downtown Plan. The following goals, outcomes,
and timelines address the future land use in the project area, development of new buildings,
infrastructure changes and needs, and creation of new spaces, facilities, and landmarks.
Goal 1: Encouraging active uses of the public realm surrounding the arena to foster a vibrant
sports and entertainment center.
•Outcome: Use downtown’s wide rights-of-way for a variety of uses, including plazas,
play areas, outdoor commercial activities and public gathering places.
Goal 2: Support the Utah Jazz, NHL, and the arena as a major generator of downtown activity
through support of synergistic development near the arena.
•Outcome: creating a comprehensive strategy for arena access, staging events, parking,
and traffic management.
•Outcome: modify 300 West in front of the arena to create a public plaza that can extend
over the street and connect through planned public spaces to the east that connect to the
Salt Palace, Abravanel Hall, and the rest of downtown.
Goal 3: Implement the vision for the Salt Palace District as identified in the Downtown Plan by
offering entertainment opportunities for locals and visitors.
•Outcome: Ensure that any redevelopment of the Salt Palace ensures adequate convention
space.
•Outcome: Improve connections through and around the Salt Palace so people can easily
find key venues in the downtown area, including performing arts venues, sports venues,
convention areas, and transportation options.
•Outcome: revitalize 100 South as Japantown Goal
4: Expand the Central Business District to the west.
•Outcome: Update zoning in the D4 zone to support the expansion of the CBD to the west
with taller buildings.
o Timeline: Complete by September 1, 2024
•Outcome: Analyze zoning regulations to judge their effectiveness in supporting high
quality architecture and streamlined approval process.
o Timeline: Ongoing through the life of the project area.
Goal 5: Add additional housing to the area around the arena to help achieve the goal of
increasing the population of the greater downtown area.
•Outcome: Update zoning to support more housing in the areas surrounding the arena.
o Timeline: Complete by September 1, 2024.
•Outcome: Support an increase in the number of families who choose to live downtown
by including playgrounds, green spaces, and shade in public spaces and near housing
within the project area.
Goal 6: Encourage infill development that can support the sports, entertainment, culture, and
convention district.
•Outcome: Adopt an adaptive reuse of existing buildings to assure space for small
businesses downtown. The adaptive reuse proposal includes development incentives for
preserving historic buildings.
o Timeline: Citywide adaptive reuse ordinance scheduled for adoption summer of
2024.
Goal 7: Incorporate important cultural sites into the district.
•Outcome: Utilize appropriate landscaping and fences to demark and transition between
private cultural spaces and public spaces.
•Outcome: utilize appropriate setbacks and lower buildings to reduce the impact building
heights have on key cultural sites.
•Outcome: locate illuminated signs so they are screened from important religious
buildings and residential uses.
Goal 8: Ensure that the design of new buildings contribute to street activation, provide spaces for
businesses, and support more housing in the downtown.
•Outcome: monitor zoning regulations and approval processes to evaluate if the
regulations are achieving the goals of the downtown plan and update as necessary.
o Timeline: ongoing
•Outcome: ensure service and delivery areas within new development is located
appropriately to reduce the impact on adjacent uses, public spaces, and streets.
•Timeline: ongoing
ti
DELTA CENTER
I
-•
I I I
I
I [
I
l
I
UJ
a-'.:lE
I
Public Asset Plan – Statement by Salt Lake County
Passed by the Utah Legislature in March 2024, SB 272 established a Capital City Revitalization
Zone that allows a local government to create a sports and entertainment project area and to
enact a sales and use tax, the revenue from which may be paid to or for the benefit of the project
participant for, among other things, the construction, demolition, modification, or realignment of
infrastructure or structures within the project area as necessary to construct entertainment and
recreational uses and to improve pedestrian and traffic flow. See Utah Code § 63N-3-1403.
Consistent with the intent of that legislation, on April 4, 2024, Smith Entertainment Group, LLC
(“SEG”) applied to Salt Lake City (“the City”) for the creation of a project area and revitalization
zone and to be approved as a project participant under the statute. That action triggered the
preparation of a participation agreement by the City and SEG, one aspect of which is a master
plan. That plan, in turn, must include a public asset plan which states to the extent possible
potential modifications, renovations, or use scenarios for existing buildings and public assets
located within the project area, including buildings, structures, or public assets owned by Salt
Lake County (“the County”). See Utah Code § 63N-3-1405(1)(b) (v)(C)(III).
The County intends to work collaboratively with the City and SEG to identify plans and a
process by which the County may renovate, realign, or modify County-owned buildings,
property, or infrastructure located within the proposed sports and entertainment project area. The
County’s willingness and ability to do so is, of course, subject to the availability of funds and
those plans being approved by the Salt Lake County Council.
Public Safety Plan
Salt Lake City is committed to a Sports, Entertainment, Culture, and Convention district and
surrounding Project Area that is safe for visitors, residents, and businesses. The City’s intent is to
mitigate crime and ensure safety and physical security within the district with a law enforcement
plan that combines consistent area coverage, targeted dissuasion, and continual coordination and
communication within the district’s businesses, residents, and community groups.
First, the City’s Police Department (“SLCPD”) will provide consistent area coverage through
two public safety channels: the downtown bike squad - which will focus its efforts within the
entertainment district during large scheduled events, as well as proactively work in identified
problem areas - and Patrol Officers who will respond to calls for service as they come in and
provide proactive hotspot checks as assigned by dispatch.
Targeted dissuasion will utilize SLCPD’s crime analysis unit to monitor crime patterns and
trends that arise in the Project Area, which will help officers to identify any burgeoning pockets
of criminal activity as well as monitor current crime hot spots. This data will help inform the
creation of strategic plans that address either scenario through prevention or disbandment tactics.
Further, SLCPD has the capacity to activate specialty and undercover unit operations as needed
should large problems or trends arise.
SLCPD’s Downtown Community Liaison Officer (“DCLO”) and Business Community
Engagement Officer (“BCEO”) will play a pivotal role in the City’s continual coordination and
communication efforts within the district as they work with area businesses and residents to
identify and solve issues. The DCLO and BCEO will be a direct point of contact and resource for
the community as they help to address concerns in a timely manner, and request or assign
enhanced resources including analytics, intelligence, and monitoring. DCLO’s also have full
support to move camera and LPR resources as needed to address any concerns that may arise in
the Project Area.
Additional, critical coordination and communication will happen as the City works with the
Delta Center Security managing director to build a public private partnership network of area
security specialists that meet regularly and share crime prevention and response resources in
order to bolster security within the district.
Finally, SEG will provide a new space within the district for use by private security personnel
and SLCPD, including for the processing and holding of arrestees.
Homelessness Mitigation Plan
Salt Lake City plans to provide resources for homeless individuals and to mitigate and manage
camping in the Project Area as follows:
Providing Resources
The City coordinates closely with the State of Utah, Salt Lake County, and numerous service
providers with the shared goal of making homelessness rare, brief, and nonrecurring. The City
provides resources to homeless individuals via the Salt Lake City Police Department
(“SLCPD”), the Salt Lake City Fire Department (“SLCFD”), and the City’s Homeless
Engagement and Response Team (“HEART”). HEART coordinates the bulk of the City’s non-
emergency responses to homelessness. HEART coordinates outreach events to connect people to
housing and services, responds to public requests for service, and coordinates cleaning
of public spaces.
The SLCPD Community Connection Team includes case workers and social workers who act as
liaisons between police officers, homeless service providers, the community, and
individuals/families that are in crisis. The Community Connection Team provides the following
services:
•Intermittent, short-term therapeutic intervention
•Care coordination between various agencies
•Case Management, which includes but is not limited to:
o Housing application and navigation assistance
o Basic needs
o Navigation of the behavioral health system
The SLCPD Crisis Intervention Team includes specially trained law enforcement officers that
are trained to effectively deal with a situation involving a person experiencing a mental health
crisis. Crisis Intervention Team officers are trained to assist in identifying characteristics of
various mental disorders. Crisis Intervention Team officers provide a safer intervention for the
person experiencing a mental health crisis, their family members, the community, and the
officers themselves.
The SLCFD Community Health Access Team includes seven social workers and Community
Health Coordinators in SLCFD’s Medical Services Division. They assist community members
who might be experiencing mental health crises, substance use/abuse issues, and medical
emergencies. They offer support at the site of an emergency or event, which reduces the
necessity for hospital visits. They can also help with prescriptions, provide therapy and substance
use treatment program referrals, and decrease the number of 911 repeat calls.
Managing Camping
The Project Area is contained within the Downtown Safety Initiative, which receives
additional public safety resources, which helps discourage camping. SLCPD may issue citations
for illegal camping if individuals refuse to relocate into available emergency shelter or another
location.
Additionally, the City’s Rapid Intervention Cleaning Team resolves small encampments through
a coordinated outreach and clean-up effort. The Rapid Intervention team, which consists of city
workers, services areas of the city that see frequent encampments or congregations of people
experiencing homelessness. Along with HEART, the Rapid Intervention Team coordinates with
the Salt Lake County Health Department to address larger encampments.
Finally, the City contracts with the Downtown Alliance to fund the Downtown Street
Ambassador team. The Ambassadors work to ensure everyone is welcome and safe downtown.
They are on the streets daily helping people find their way, assisting businesses with impacts
from homelessness and other issues, and referring people in need to qualified service providers.
Salt Lake City, Utah
Arena Revitalization
Event Ingress Operations
Traffic Study
June 21, 2024
UT24-2765
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, UT 84043 p 801.766.4343
www.halesengineering.com
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with peak Friday event conditions between
6:00 and 7:00 pm for the proposed Arena Revitalization project located in Salt Lake City, Utah.
This study focuses on the Delta Center and key intersections throughout the surrounding area.
The purpose of this traffic impact study is to analyze traffic operations at key intersections for
existing (2024), future (2029), and future (2050) conditions with and without peak event traffic
resulting from the Arena Revitalization project. The evening event ingress time level of service
(LOS) results are shown in Table ES-1. A site plan of the project is provided in Appendix A.
Table ES-1: Evening Event Ingress Time Level of Service Results
ii
Project Conditions
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
The Arena Revitalization project includes an at-grade pedestrian plaza between the Delta Center and block
78, east of the arena. To facilitate this at-grade pedestrian plaza, it has been proposed that a 300 West
tunnel be constructed from 200 South to North Temple. In addition to the proposed pedestrian plaza, an
additional 500-stall parking structure is proposed on the southwest corner of the arena. It is also proposed
that vehicular traffic on South Temple be restricted between 300 West and 400 West during event times to
allow more efficient movement of pedestrians to and from the Arena TRAX station.
2024 Background Event Ingress
Assumptions
Findings
•Existing traffic studied during non-event
Friday conditions from 6:00 – 7:00 PM
•Acceptable LOS
•Arena event traffic ingress conditions
o Gameday traffic was calibrated using
historic turning movement counts obtained
on peak Fridays when events have been
held at the Delta Center
•Event Ingress signal control patterns were
included in the analysis, including pedestrian
recalls on all major intersections in the
downtown area.
•Acceptable LOS
2029 Background Event Ingress
Assumptions
Findings
•Background traffic was grown based
on the 5-year growth rate projections
from the Downtown Salt Lake City
Traffic Study (Fehr & Peers, 2023)
•Minor signal timing split
adjustments based on growth
•Acceptable LOS
•Event Ingress signal control patterns used.
Minor split adjustments made for growth in
volumes
•Acceptable LOS
2050 Background Event Ingress
•A conservative 1% annual traffic growth
rate from 2029 to 2050 was assumed
Assumptions based on the current WFRC travel
demand model
•Event Ingress signal control patterns
adjustments for growth in volumes
•Minor signal timing split adjustments
based on growth
Findings •Acceptable LOS •Acceptable LOS
iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................T...A...B...L...E....O...F....C...O...N....T..E...N...T...S.......................i
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................iii
LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................................iv
LIST OF FIGURES.......................................................................................................................................iv
I.INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1
A.Purpose.................................................................................................................................................1
B.Scope....................................................................................................................................................2
C.Analysis Methodology............................................................................................................................2
D.Level of Service Standards....................................................................................................................3
II.EXISTING (2024) BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................5
A.Purpose.................................................................................................................................................5
B.Traffic Volumes......................................................................................................................................5
C.Level of Service Analysis.......................................................................................................................6
D.Queuing Analysis...................................................................................................................................6
E.Mitigation Measures ..............................................................................................................................6
III.EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS..........................................................................................................9
A.Project Description ................................................................................................................................9
B.Event Ingress Traffic..............................................................................................................................9
IV.EXISTING (2024) EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS...........................................................................10
A.Purpose...............................................................................................................................................10
B.Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................10
C.Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................................................................10
D.Queuing Analysis ................................................................................................................................10
E.Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................10
V.FUTURE (2029) BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................13
A.Purpose...............................................................................................................................................13
B.Roadway Network...............................................................................................................................13
C.Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................13
D.Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................................................................13
E.Queuing Analysis ................................................................................................................................13
F.Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................13
VI.FUTURE (2029) EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS.............................................................................16
A.Purpose...............................................................................................................................................16
B.Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................16
C.Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................................................................16
D.Queuing Analysis ................................................................................................................................16
E.Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................16
VII.FUTURE (2050) BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................19
A.Purpose...............................................................................................................................................19
B.Roadway Network...............................................................................................................................19
C.Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................19
D.Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................................................................19
E.Queuing Analysis ................................................................................................................................19
F.Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................19
iv
VIII.FUTURE (2050) EVENT I N G R E STSACBOLNED I OT I FO NCSO..N....T..E...N...T...S....................22
A.Purpose...............................................................................................................................................22
B.Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................................................................22
C.Level of Service Analysis ....................................................................................................................22
D.Queuing Analysis ................................................................................................................................22
E.Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................22
Appendix A: Arena Revitalization Concept Plan
Appendix B: Turning Movement Counts
Appendix C: LOS Results
Appendix D: Queuing Results
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Level of Service Description....................................................................................................4
Table 2: Existing (2024) Background Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS .................................................8
Table 3: Existing (2024) Event Ingress Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS.............................................12
Table 4: Future (2029) Background Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS..................................................15
Table 5: Future (2029) Event Ingress Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS...............................................18
Table 6: Future (2050) Background Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS..................................................21
Table 7: Future (2050) Event Ingress Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS...............................................24
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Vicinity map showing the studied intersections in Salt Lake City, Utah..................................1
Figure 2: Existing (2024) background evening study period traffic volumes..........................................7
Figure 3: Existing (2024) event ingress evening study period traffic volumes.....................................11
Figure 4: Future (2029) background evening study period traffic volumes..........................................14
Figure 5: Future (2029) event ingress evening study period traffic volumes........................................17
Figure 6: Future (2050) background evening study period traffic volumes..........................................20
Figure 7: Future (2050) event ingress evening study period traffic volumes........................................23
1
I. INTRODUCTION
A.Purpose
This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Arena Revitalization
development located in Salt Lake City, Utah. Figure 1 shows a vicinity map of the study area with
and study intersections.
The purpose of this traffic impact study is to analyze traffic operations at key intersections for
existing (2024), future (2029), and future (2050) conditions with and without the peak event traffic
and to recommend mitigation measures as needed. The impact of a 300 West tunnel between
200 South and North Temple to the surrounding traffic network during peak event traffic conditions
is also evaluated.
Figure 1: Vicinity map showing the studied intersections in Salt Lake City, Utah
2
B.Scope
The study area was defined based on conversations with the development team. This study was
scoped to evaluate the traffic operational performance impacts of the project on the following
intersections:
•600 North / 300 West
•North Temple / 400 West
•South Temple / 400 West
•100 South / 400 West
•200 South / 400 West
•400 South / 400 West
•500 South / 400 West
•600 South / 400 West
•North Temple / 300 West
•South Temple / 300 West
•100 South / 300 West
•200 South / 300 West
•400 South / 300 West
•500 South / 300 West
•600 South / 300 West
•North Temple / 200 West
•South Temple / 200 West
•100 South / 200 West
•200 South / 200 West
•North Temple / West Temple
•South Temple / West Temple
•100 South / West Temple
•200 South / West Temple
•North Temple / State Street
•400 South / State Street
C.Analysis Methodology
Level of service (LOS) is a term that describes the operating performance of an intersection or
roadway. LOS is measured quantitatively and reported on a scale from A to F, with A representing
the best performance and F the worst. Table 1 provides a brief description of each LOS letter
designation and an accompanying average delay per vehicle for both signalized and unsignalized
intersections.
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition, 2022 methodology was used in this study to
remain consistent with “state-of-the-practice” professional standards. This methodology has
different quantitative evaluations for signalized and unsignalized intersections. For signalized,
roundabout, and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, the LOS is provided for the overall
intersection (weighted average of all approach delays). For all other unsignalized intersections,
LOS is reported based on the worst movement.
Using Synchro/SimTraffic software, which follow the HCM methodology, the peak hour LOS was
computed for each study intersection. Multiple runs of SimTraffic were used to provide a statistical
evaluation of the interaction between the intersections. The detailed LOS reports are provided in
Appendix C. Hales Engineering also calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for the study
intersections using SimTraffic. The detailed queue length reports are provided in Appendix D.
Many of the figures in this report are printouts of the Synchro model. These figures are not meant
to be a design exhibit for exact lane striping and design, due to the limitations of the Synchro
software. Instead, the purpose of these figures is to show assumed peak hour turning movement
volumes and the conceptual travel lane configuration of the study roadway network.
3
D.Level of Service Standards
For the purposes of this study, a minimum acceptable intersection performance for each of the
study intersections was set at LOS D. If levels of service E or F conditions exist, an explanation
and/or mitigation measures will be presented. A LOS D threshold is consistent with“state-of-the-
practice” traffic engineering principles for urbanized areas.
4
Table 1: Level of Service Description
Average Delay
(seconds/vehicle)
LOS Description of
Traffic Conditions Signalized
Intersections
Unsignalized
Intersections
A
B
C
D
E
F
Free Flow / 10 10 Insignificant Delay
Stable Operations /> 10 to 20 > 10 to
15 Minimum Delays
Stable Operations /> 20 to 35 > 15 to
25 Acceptable Delays
Approaching
Unstable Flows / > 35 to 55 > 25 to
35 Tolerable Delays
Unstable Operations > 55 to 80 > 35 to 50/ Significant Delays
Forced Flows /
Unpredictable Flows 80 > 50
/ Excessive Delays
Source: Hales Engineering Descriptions, based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition, 2022
Methodology (Transportation Research Board)
5
II. EXISTING (2024) BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
A.Purpose
The purpose of the background analysis is to study the intersections and roadways during the
peak travel periods of the day with background traffic and geometric conditions. Through this
analysis, background traffic operational deficiencies can be identified, and potential mitigation
measures recommended. This analysis provides a baseline condition that may be compared to
the event conditions to identify the impacts of the development.
B.Traffic Volumes
A preliminary look at existing traffic patterns in downtown Salt Lake showed peak traffic conditions
for events hosted at the arena to be on Friday evenings before the event begins. Therefore, to
capture these worst-case conditions, Friday evening (5:00 to 7:00 p.m.) peak period traffic counts
were performed at the following intersections:
•600 North / 300 West
•North Temple / 400 West
•South Temple / 400 West
•100 South / 400 West
•200 South / 400 West
•400 South / 400 West
•500 South / 400 West
•600 South / 400 West
•North Temple / 300 West
•South Temple / 300 West
•100 South / 300 West
•200 South / 300 West
•400 South / 300 West
•500 South / 300 West
•600 South / 300 West
•North Temple / 200 West
•South Temple / 200 West
•100 South / 200 West
•200 South / 200 West
•North Temple / West Temple
•South Temple / West Temple
•100 South / West Temple
•200 South / West Temple
•North Temple / State Street
•400 South / State Street
The counts were performed on Friday, May 10, 2024, and on Friday May 17, 2024. The evening
event time from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. was selected to be analyzed since many large events taking
place at the arena occur around 7:00 p.m. and have peak loading traffic conditions beginning at
approximately 6:00 p.m. Therefore, these evening event time volumes were used in the analysis
to represent the worst-case conditions. Detailed count data are included in Appendix B.
Hales Engineering considered potential seasonal adjustments to the observed traffic volumes.
Monthly traffic volume data were obtained from a nearby UDOT automatic traffic recorder (ATR)
on North Temple (ATR #409). In recent years, traffic volumes in May have been approximately
equal to average traffic volumes. Therefore, no seasonality adjustments were necessary.
Figure 2 shows the existing evening study period volumes as well as intersection geometry at the
study intersections.
6
C.Level of Service Analysis
Hales Engineering determined that all study intersections are currently operating at acceptable
levels of service during the evening study period, as shown in Table 2. These results serve as a
baseline condition for the impact analysis of the event traffic during existing (2024) conditions.
D.Queuing Analysis
Hales Engineering calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for each of the study intersections.
No significant queueing was observed during the 6:00 – 7:00 p.m. evening conditions.
E.Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are recommended.
SLC Arena Revitalization TS Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Existing (2024) Background Figure 2
4129
35
600 North 69121374
2823270
147270
48
43222
101
254271
136
North Temple 26501
22
19574
29
North Temple 33236
431
South Temple 45
14
1419222
202
77
93194
28 15
46 10
65 37
36 100 South 28 12
213
100 South26173
79 61 52
5311566
28112
22
200 South 4782
80
7668
131
14163
34
31194
10
90127
19
4467
60
400 South (University Blvd)1091008
26
63891
34
85903
169
11676789
400 South (University Blvd)92620
199
6765389
500 South
369 600 South 3771869
141
162
Hales Engineering 801.766.4343
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, Utah 84043 06/21/2024
8
Table 2: Existing (2024) Background Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS
Intersection Level of Service
Aver. DelayDescriptionControlMovement1
(Sec. / Veh.)LOS2
600 North / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -14.5 B
North Temple / 400 West Signal -21.9 C
South Temple / 400 West Signal -5.0 A
100 South / 400 West Signal -13.4 B
200 South / 400 West Signal -16.5 B
400 South / 400 West Signal -17.5 B
500 South / 400 West Signal -13.4 B
600 South / 400 West Signal -14.3 B
North Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -19.9 B
South Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -15.7 B
100 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -8.1 A
200 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -16.1 B
400 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -23.1 C
500 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -19.8 B
600 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -17.7 B North
Temple / 200 West Signal - 5.9 A
South Temple / 200 West Signal -13.0 B
100 South / 200 West Signal -7.8 A
200 South / 200 West Signal -9.0 A
North Temple / West Temple Signal -14.5 B
South Temple / West Temple Signal -10.9 B
100 South / West Temple Signal -8.7 A
200 South / West Temple Signal -10.6 B
North Temple / State Street Signal -26.8 C
400 South / State Street Signal -26.5 C
1.Movement indicated for unsignalized intersections where delay and LOS represents worst movement. SBL = Southbound left movement, etc.
2.Uppercase LOS used for signalized, roundabout, and AWSC intersections. Lowercase LOS used for all other unsignalized intersections.
Source: Hales Engineering, June 2024
9
III. EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS
A.Project Description
It is proposed that a new 500-stall parking facility be constructed on the southwest corner of the
Delta Center. Additionally, it is proposed that an at-grade pedestrian plaza be constructed on 300
West between the Delta Center and block 78 to the east, which is to be studied and redeveloped
at a future date. It is also proposed that South Temple between 300 West and 400 West be closed
to vehicular traffic to facilitate access to the UTA TRAX Arena station.
As part of the proposed pedestrian plaza, it is proposed that a tunnel be constructed on 300 West
between 200 South and North Temple to vertically separate vehicular traffic from the pedestrian
plaza and ensure that 300 West continues to function appropriately as an arterial through
downtown. A concept plan for the proposed parking garage and for the pedestrian plaza and
roadway tunnel on 300 West is provided in Appendix A.
B.Event Ingress Traffic
To evaluate the worst-case impact of a large event taking place on a peak weekday (Friday) at
the arena and to simulate the traffic conditions during the event ingress period for such an event
between 6:00 and 7:00 p.m., the background volumes obtained during data collection were
increased and adjusted to reflect these event ingress conditions. These adjustments were made
using historic event-day traffic counts as available as well as by proportionately adjusting
movements at key intersections where automatic traffic signal performance metric (ATSPM) traffic
count data were available on Fridays for both typical non-event and event days at the arena. For
future event-day volume projections, the difference in non-event and event-day trip volumes were
applied to the future projected background volumes to keep the spike in traffic due to an event-
day constant.
10
IV. EXISTING (2024) EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS
A.Purpose
The purpose of the existing (2024) event ingress analysis is to study the intersections and
roadways during the event ingress time on a Friday. This scenario provides valuable insight into
the potential impacts of the proposed project on background traffic conditions.
B.Traffic Volumes
Hales Engineering added the project trips discussed in Chapter III to the existing (2024)
background traffic volumes to predict turning movement volumes for existing (2024) event ingress
conditions. Existing (2024) event ingress evening study period turning movement volumes are
shown in Figure 3.
C.Level of Service Analysis
Hales Engineering determined that all intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels
of service during the evening study period with project traffic added, as shown in Table 3.
D.Queuing Analysis
Hales Engineering calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for each of the study intersections.
No significant queueing is anticipated during the evening study period.
E.Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are recommended.
SLC Arena Revitalization TS Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Existing (2024) Event Ingress Figure 3
515045
600 North 69
185669
39235
69
109240278
48293
87
263306
111
26501
426
19641
143
North Temple 33236
431
0
0
0 0 210
0 80
0
95
110
38
55 15189279
1263
59
162213
100 South
73115
66
96273
35
200 South 61127
80
10068236
117245
40
31355
10
44160
83
90255
19
400 South (University Blvd) 1091246
31
63891
41
2421020
112
145785
83
400 South (University Blvd)115780250
70710
90
1182398
16
500 South
3692489
100
600 South 5771869
141
43
Hales Engineering 801.766.4343
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, Utah 84043 06/21/2024
12
Table 3: Existing (2024) Event Ingress Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS
Intersection Level of Service
Aver. DelayDescriptionControlMovement1
(Sec. / Veh.)LOS2
600 North / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -25.7 C
North Temple / 400 West Signal -28.3 C
South Temple / 400 West Signal -14.2 B
100 South / 400 West Signal -18.3 B
200 South / 400 West Signal -17.5 B
400 South / 400 West Signal -18.8 B
500 South / 400 West Signal -14.2 B
600 South / 400 West Signal -15.2 B
North Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -25.1 C
South Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -0.9 A
100 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -11.7 B
200 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -27.4 C
400 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -25.9 C
500 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -20.7 C
600 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -16.4 B North
Temple / 200 West Signal - 7.9 A
South Temple / 200 West Signal -9.4 A
100 South / 200 West Signal -10.4 B
200 South / 200 West Signal -9.4 A
North Temple / West Temple Signal -15.8 B
South Temple / West Temple Signal -11.3 B
100 South / West Temple Signal -8.5 A
200 South / West Temple Signal -10.9 B
North Temple / State Street Signal -27.4 C
400 South / State Street Signal -28.9 C
1.Movement indicated for unsignalized intersections where delay and LOS represents worst movement. SBL = Southbound left movement, etc.
2.Uppercase LOS used for signalized, roundabout, and AWSC intersections. Lowercase LOS used for all other unsignalized intersections.
Source: Hales Engineering, June 2024
13
V. FUTURE (2029) BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
A.Purpose
The purpose of the future (2029) background analysis is to study the intersections and roadways
during the Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m. period for future background traffic and geometric conditions.
Through this analysis, future background traffic operational deficiencies can be identified, and
potential mitigation measures recommended.
B.Roadway Network
According to the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) Regional Transportation Plan, there
are no projects planned before 2029 in the study area. Therefore, no changes were made to the
roadway network for the future (2029) analysis.
C.Traffic Volumes
The Downtown Salt Lake Traffic Study (Fehr & Peers, 2023) was utilized to obtain calibrated
future 5-year growth rates in downtown Salt Lake City. The study divided the downtown area into
quadrants and estimated the annual growth rates based on future projects in each quadrant of
the city. In the northwest quadrant, where the Delta Center and majority of the study intersections
are located, an annual growth rate of 2.66% was assumed. Future (2029) evening study period
turning movement volumes are shown in Figure 4.
D.Level of Service Analysis
Hales Engineering determined that all study intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable
levels of service during the evening study period in future (2029) background conditions, as shown
in Table 4. These results serve as a baseline condition for the impact analysis of the proposed
development for future (2029) conditions.
E.Queuing Analysis
Hales Engineering calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for each of the study intersections.
No significant queueing is anticipated during the evening study period.
F.Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are recommended.
SLC - Arena Revitalization TS Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Future (2029) Background Figure 4
1033070
600 North 90305470
30265
80
170310
55
50255
115
290310155
North Temple 30570
25
20655
35
North Temple 35250
460
65
South Temple 50
15
215
80
205
30 15
50 10
75 40
40 100 South 30 1530205907060
170
225
100 South
6013075
30130
25
200 South 5595
90
8580
150
15185
40
3522010
95135
20
4570
65
400 South (University Blvd) 1101035
25
6591535
85925
175
12079090
400 South (University Blvd)100665
215
1252565
15
500 South
3802350
105
600 South 3851920
145
45 100
Hales Engineering 801.766.4343
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, Utah 84043 06/21/2024
15
Table 4: Future (2029) Background Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS
Intersection Level of Service
Aver. DelayDescriptionControlMovement1
(Sec. / Veh.)LOS2
600 North / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -26.1 C
North Temple / 400 West Signal -22.6 C
South Temple / 400 West Signal -11.5 B
100 South / 400 West Signal -18.7 B
200 South / 400 West Signal -17.0 B
400 South / 400 West Signal -19.1 B
500 South / 400 West Signal -12.7 B
600 South / 400 West Signal -13.9 B
North Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -20.2 C
South Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -14.7 B
100 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -6.8 A
200 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -21.5 C
400 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -24.5 C
500 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -20.9 C
600 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -17.8 B North
Temple / 200 West Signal - 5.9 A
South Temple / 200 West Signal -14.5 B
100 South / 200 West Signal -6.5 A
200 South / 200 West Signal -9.8 A
North Temple / West Temple Signal -14.4 B
South Temple / West Temple Signal -10.4 B
100 South / West Temple Signal -9.0 A
200 South / West Temple Signal -9.6 A
North Temple / State Street Signal -29.0 C
400 South / State Street Signal -28.5 C
1.Movement indicated for unsignalized intersections where delay and LOS represents worst movement. SBL = Southbound left movement, etc.
2.Uppercase LOS used for signalized, roundabout, and AWSC intersections. Lowercase LOS used for all other unsignalized intersections.
Source: Hales Engineering, June 2024
16
VI. FUTURE (2029) EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS
A.Purpose
The purpose of the future (2029) event ingress analysis is to study the intersections and roadways
during the event ingress period on a Friday. This scenario provides valuable insight into the
potential impacts of the arena on background traffic conditions.
B.Traffic Volumes
Hales Engineering added the project trips discussed in Chapter III to the future (2029) background
traffic volumes to predict turning movement volumes for future (2029) event ingress conditions.
Future (2029) event ingress evening study period turning movement volumes are shown in Figure
5.
C.Level of Service Analysis
Hales Engineering determined that all intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels
of service during the evening study period in future (2029) event ingress conditions, as shown in
Table 5.
D.Queuing Analysis
Hales Engineering calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for each of the study intersections.
No significant queueing is anticipated during the evening study period.
E.Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are recommended.
SLC Arena Revitalization TS Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Future (2029) Event Ingress Figure 5
1135180
600 North 90369765
41
268
79
132280
285
55326
101
299345130
30570429
20722
149
North Temple
0
0
0 1 223
28 83
3
102
121
41
59 182210190
1295
67
170225
100 South
8013075
98291
38
200 South 69140
90
10980
255
11826746
35381
10
4516388
95263
20
400 South (University Blvd) 1101281
30
65915
42
2501042
118
149808
84
400 South (University Blvd)123825
266
73757
96
1202465
14
500 South
380 600 South 58525501920
105 145
43
Hales Engineering 801.766.4343
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, Utah 84043 06/21/2024
18
Table 5: Future (2029) Event Ingress Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS
Intersection Level of Service
Aver. DelayDescriptionControlMovement1
(Sec. / Veh.)LOS2
600 North / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -34.1 C
North Temple / 400 West Signal -31.0 C
South Temple / 400 West Signal -13.4 B
100 South / 400 West Signal -20.7 C
200 South / 400 West Signal -18.4 B
400 South / 400 West Signal -18.3 B
500 South / 400 West Signal -14.8 B
600 South / 400 West Signal -15.8 B
North Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -25.6 C
South Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -0.8 A
100 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -11.1 B
200 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -27.4 C
400 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -30.0 C
500 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -20.8 C
600 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -17.4 B North
Temple / 200 West Signal - 7.4 A
South Temple / 200 West Signal -10.3 B
100 South / 200 West Signal -10.9 B
200 South / 200 West Signal -10.1 B
North Temple / West Temple Signal -17.0 B
South Temple / West Temple Signal -11.3 B
100 South / West Temple Signal -8.6 A
200 South / West Temple Signal -11.2 B
North Temple / State Street Signal -27.4 C
400 South / State Street Signal -30.2 C
1.Movement indicated for unsignalized intersections where delay and LOS represents worst movement. SBL = Southbound left movement, etc.
2.Uppercase LOS used for signalized, roundabout, and AWSC intersections. Lowercase LOS used for all other unsignalized intersections.
Source: Hales Engineering, June 2024
19
VII. FUTURE (2050) BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
A.Purpose
The purpose of the future (2050) background analysis is to study the intersections and roadways
during the Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m. period for future background traffic and geometric conditions.
Through this analysis, future background traffic operational deficiencies can be identified, and
potential mitigation measures recommended.
B.Roadway Network
According to the WFRC Regional Transportation Plan, there are no projects planned before 2050
in the study area. Therefore, no changes were made to the roadway network for the future (2050)
analysis.
C.Traffic Volumes
Because the Fehr & Peers Downtown Salt Lake City Traffic Study did not include growth rates
beyond a 5-year horizon, Hales Engineering obtained future (2050) forecasted volumes from the
WFRC / MAG travel demand model. Upon reviewing these models, it was determined that an
annual growth rate of 1% would be a conservative estimate for the studied intersections. Future
(2050) background evening 6:00 – 7:00 p. m. turning movement volumes are shown in Figure 6.
D.Level of Service Analysis
Hales Engineering determined that all study intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable
levels of service during the evening study period in future (2050) background conditions, as shown
in Table 6. These results serve as a baseline condition for the impact analysis of the proposed
development for future (2050) conditions.
E.Queuing Analysis
Hales Engineering calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for each of the study intersections.
No significant queueing is anticipated during the evening study period.
F.Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are recommended.
SLC Arena Revitalization Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Future (2050) Background Figure 6
1033070
600 North 90305470
40325
100
205380
65
60310
140
355380
190
North Temple 35705
30
25805
40
North Temple 45310
565
55
80
South Temple 65
20
20270
30
265
100
255
50
35
110
40 20
65 15
90 50
100 South 40 152558575
210280
100 South
7516095
4015530
200 South 65115
110
10595
185
20230
50
4527515
120165
25
6090
80
400 South (University Blvd) 1401275
35
80112545
1101140
215
145970115
400 South (University Blvd)120820
260
90860
115
1553160
20
500 South
4652895
125
600 South 475
2365
180
120
Hales Engineering 801.766.4343
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, Utah 84043 06/21/2024
21
Table 6: Future (2050) Background Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS
Intersection Level of Service
Aver. DelayDescriptionControlMovement1
(Sec. / Veh.)LOS2
600 North / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -30.6 C
North Temple / 400 West Signal -24.2 C
South Temple / 400 West Signal -12.2 B
100 South / 400 West Signal -17.2 B
200 South / 400 West Signal -17.7 B
400 South / 400 West Signal -23.9 C
500 South / 400 West Signal -14.7 B
600 South / 400 West Signal -18.2 B
North Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -25.7 C
South Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -19.8 B
100 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -7.9 A
200 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -20.6 C
400 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -28.9 C
500 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -23.1 C
600 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -22.3 C North
Temple / 200 West Signal - 6.8 A
South Temple / 200 West Signal -13.6 B
100 South / 200 West Signal -6.3 A
200 South / 200 West Signal -10.7 B
North Temple / West Temple Signal -16.8 B
South Temple / West Temple Signal -11.2 B
100 South / West Temple Signal -11.1 B
200 South / West Temple Signal -10.8 B
North Temple / State Street Signal -33.8 C
400 South / State Street Signal -32.6 C
1.Movement indicated for unsignalized intersections where delay and LOS represents worst movement. SBL = Southbound left movement, etc.
2.Uppercase LOS used for signalized, roundabout, and AWSC intersections. Lowercase LOS used for all other unsignalized intersections.
Source: Hales Engineering, June 2024
22
VIII. FUTURE (2050) EVENT INGRESS CONDITIONS
A.Purpose
The purpose of the future (2050) event ingress analysis is to study the intersections and roadways
during the event ingress period on a Friday. This scenario provides valuable insight into the
potential impacts of the arena on background traffic conditions.
B.Traffic Volumes
Hales Engineering added the project trips discussed in Chapter III to the future (2050) background
traffic volumes to predict turning movement volumes for future (2050) event ingress conditions.
Future (2050) event ingress evening study period turning movement volumes are shown in Figure
7.
C.Level of Service Analysis
Hales Engineering determined that all intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels
of service during the evening study period in future (2050) event ingress conditions, as shown in
Table 7.
D.Queuing Analysis
Hales Engineering calculated the 95th percentile queue lengths for each of the study intersections.
No significant queueing is anticipated during the evening study period. Significant 95th percentile
queue lengths during the evening study period are summarized as follows:
E.Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are recommended.
SLC Arena Revitalization TS Friday 6:00 - 7:00 p.m.
Future (2050) Event Ingress Figure 7
11351
80
600 North 90
369
765
5132899
167350
295
65381
126
364415
165
35705
434
25872
154
North Temple 45310
565
0
0
0 6 273
78 103
8
122
171
6927
110
49
51
23
116
1295
82
210
280
100 South
95160
95
108316
43
200 South 80160110
13095290
12331256
4543615
60183
103
120293
25
400 South (University Blvd)1401513
40
801125
52
2671257
158
174988
109
400 South (University Blvd)143980311
93917116
1503060
19
500 South
4653095
125
600 South 675
2365
180
Hales Engineering 801.766.4343
1220 North 500 West, Ste. 202 Lehi, Utah 84043 06/21/2024
Table 7: Future (2050) Event Ingress Evening (6:00 – 7:00 p.m.) LOS
Intersection Level of Service
Aver. DelayDescriptionControlMovement1
(Sec. / Veh.)LOS2
600 North / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -36.6 D
North Temple / 400 West Signal -31.9 C
South Temple / 400 West Signal -13.3 B
100 South / 400 West Signal -21.5 C
200 South / 400 West Signal -20.1 C
400 South / 400 West Signal -22.7 C
500 South / 400 West Signal -16.5 B
600 South / 400 West Signal -19.3 B
North Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -36.2 D
South Temple / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -0.9 A
100 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -11.4 B
200 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -28.2 C
400 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -43.2 D
500 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -24.5 C
600 South / 300 West (John Stockton Drive)Signal -21.2 C North
Temple / 200 West Signal - 7.0 A
South Temple / 200 West Signal -11.4 B
100 South / 200 West Signal -9.1 A
200 South / 200 West Signal -10.9 B
North Temple / West Temple Signal -19.4 B
South Temple / West Temple Signal -13.0 B
100 South / West Temple Signal -8.3 A
200 South / West Temple Signal -22.5 C
North Temple / State Street Signal -32.3 C
400 South / State Street Signal -36.0 D
1.Movement indicated for unsignalized intersections where delay and LOS represents worst movement. SBL = Southbound left movement, etc.
2.Uppercase LOS used for signalized, roundabout, and AWSC intersections. Lowercase LOS used for all other unsignalized intersections.
Source: Hales Engineering, June 2024
24
APPENDIX A
Arena Revitalization Concept Plan
East/West At-Grade
Pedestrian Plaza, over
the top of the 300 West
Tunnel
Event Condition
200 South
60 ft
485 ft
90 ft
Parking
Structure
102 ft
50 ft
485 ft
60 ft
300 West - Concept 3
SLC Downtown District
DATE
05/20/2024
PROJECT
UT24-2765
North Temple
Shift taper (35 mph
design speed over 3 ft)
100 South
South Temple
Northbound outside lane from
South Temple. Southbound
outside lane traps right due to
limited ROW
40
0
W
e
s
t
30
0
W
e
s
t
20
0
W
e
s
t
N
APPENDIX B
Turning Movement Counts
2937
2937
2638
0 2638
AM
Traffic Count Solutions LLC
801.505.9052
Intersection Turning Movement Summary
Intersection: 500 South / 400 West Date:5-10-24, Fri
North/South Road: 500 South Day of Week Adjustment:100.0%
East/West Road: 400 West Month of Year Adjustment:100.0%
Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Adjustment Station #:0
Project Title: Salt Lake City Arena Revitalization TS Growth Rate:0.0%
Project No: UT24-2765 Number of Years:0
Weather: Clear
AM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
AM PHF:
MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PHF:
PM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 5:00 PM-6:00 PM
PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: 5:00 PM-5:15 PM
PM PHF: 0.87
3
400 West
Total Entering Vehicles
0
0
400 West
2
12
167 336 0
107 503
Legend
Midday
PM
610
SUMMARY
500 South
Northbound
Left Thru Right Peds
500 South
Southbound
Left Thru Right Peds
400 West
Eastbound
Left Thru Right Peds
400 West
Westbound
Left Thru Right Peds
TOTAL
Period A B C D
7:00 - 7:15 0 0 0 0
7:15 - 7:30 0 0 0 0
7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0
7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0
8:00 - 8:15 0 0 0 0
8:15 - 8:30 0 0 0 0
8:30 - 8:45 0 0 0 0
8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MIDDAY PERIOD COUNTS
Period A B C D
9:00 - 9:15 0 0 0 0
9:15 - 9:30 0 0 0 0
9:30 - 9:45 0 0 0 0
9:45 - 10:00 0 0 0 0
10:00 - 10:15 0 0 0 0
10:15 - 10:30 0 0 0 0
10:30 - 10:45 0 0 0 0
10:45 - 11:00 0 0 0 0
11:00 - 11:15 0 0 0 0
11:15 - 11:30 0 0 0 0
11:30 - 11:45 0 0 0 0
11:45 - 12:00 0 0 0 0
12:00 - 12:15 0 0 0 0
12:15 - 12:30 0 0 0 0
12:30 - 12:45 0 0 0 0
12:45 - 13:00 0 0 0 0
13:00 - 13:15 0 0 0 0
13:15 - 13:30 0 0 0 0
13:30 - 13:45 0 0 0 0
13:45 - 14:00 0 0 0 0
14:00 - 14:15 0 0 0 0
14:15 - 14:30 0 0 0 0
14:30 - 14:45 0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P14:P4E5R-I1O5D:0C0 OUNTS0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15:P00er-io1d5:15 A0 B0 C0 D0
1175::0105 - 1157::3105 403 102 0 04
1175::1350 - 1157::4350 307 809 0 04
1175::3405 - 1167::0405 507 702 0 04
17:45 - 18:00 30 73 0 0
18:00 - 18:15 26 79 0 0
18:15 - 18:30 49 70 0 6
18:30 - 18:45 33 70 0 6
18:45 - 19:00 38 77 0 0
E0 F0 G0 H0
0 305 706 01
0 105 607 0
0 208 700 02
0 12 59 0
0 23 50 2
0 13 67 0
0 19 44 1
0 23 52 1
0I 0J K0 L0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 02
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1
M0 N0 O0 P002 7028 105 0102 6050 506 04
06 5078 201 03
7 542 31 4
4 619 28 0
4 559 16 2
0 500 21 5
2 483 53 6
TO0TAL
10001
9016
8032
754
829
778
687
728
12
0 03503
459362
821
50
0
S
o
u
t
h
50
0
S
o
u
t
h
N
272 90 0
123
2498
17
19
AM
Traffic Count Solutions LLC
801.505.9052
Intersection Turning Movement Summary
Intersection: 500 South / 300 West Date:5-10-24, Fri
North/South Road: 500 South Day of Week Adjustment:100.0%
East/West Road: 300 West Month of Year Adjustment:100.0%
Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Adjustment Station #:0
Project Title: Salt Lake City Arena Revitalization TS Growth Rate:0.0%
Project No: UT24-2765 Number of Years:0
Weather: Clear
AM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
AM PHF:
MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PHF:
PM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 5:00 PM-6:00 PM
PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: 5:00 PM-5:15 PM
PM PHF: 0.91
300 West
2653
0
0
Total Entering Vehicles
300 West
5
4
113 728 1
692 842
Legend
Midday
PM
1534
SUMMARY
500 South
Northbound
Left Thru Right Peds
500 South
Southbound
Left Thru Right Peds
300 West
Eastbound
Left Thru Right Peds
300 West
Westbound
Left Thru Right Peds
TOTAL
Period A B C D
7:00 - 7:15 0 0 0 0
7:15 - 7:30 0 0 0 0
7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0
7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0
8:00 - 8:15 0 0 0 0
8:15 - 8:30 0 0 0 0
8:30 - 8:45 0 0 0 0
8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MIDDAY PERIOD COUNTS
Period A B C D
9:00 - 9:15 0 0 0 0
9:15 - 9:30 0 0 0 0
9:30 - 9:45 0 0 0 0
9:45 - 10:00 0 0 0 0
10:00 - 10:15 0 0 0 0
10:15 - 10:30 0 0 0 0
10:30 - 10:45 0 0 0 0
10:45 - 11:00 0 0 0 0
11:00 - 11:15 0 0 0 0
11:15 - 11:30 0 0 0 0
11:30 - 11:45 0 0 0 0
11:45 - 12:00 0 0 0 0
12:00 - 12:15 0 0 0 0
12:15 - 12:30 0 0 0 0
12:30 - 12:45 0 0 0 0
12:45 - 13:00 0 0 0 0
13:00 - 13:15 0 0 0 0
13:15 - 13:30 0 0 0 0
13:30 - 13:45 0 0 0 0
13:45 - 14:00 0 0 0 0
14:00 - 14:15 0 0 0 0
14:15 - 14:30 0 0 0 0
14:30 - 14:45 0 0 0 0P14:P4E5R-I1O5D:0C0 OUNTS0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
15:00 - 15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Period A B C D
1175::0105 - 1157::3105 204 2107 01 0
1175::1350 - 1157::4350 206 1803 0 0
1175::3405 - 1167::0405 308 1605 0 03
17:45 - 18:00 25 163 0 1
18:00 - 18:15 23 187 0 0
18:15 - 18:30 33 169 0 6
18:30 - 18:45 21 139 0 5
18:45 - 19:00 18 140 0 7
E F G H
0 1300 706 100
0 1603 908 0
0 904 708 05
0 118 100 4
0 107 114 4
0 129 116 4
0 95 99 7
0 114 74 7
I J K L
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
0 0 0 03
0 0 0 2
0 0 0 4
0 0 0 4
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 5
M N O P
303 6050 302 07
403 5077 505 04
402 4092 401 100
69 469 53 9
31 439 54 3
37 459 46 6
24 387 51 10
48 369 37 10
TOTAL
11063
11045
9050
997
955
989
816
800
30
2653 2556
4255 1
2557
0
0
909857
1766
50
0
S
o
u
t
h
50
0
S
o
u
t
h
N
352 505 0
181
2188
187
369
2180
100
2905
AM
Traffic Count Solutions LLC
801.505.9052
Intersection Turning Movement Summary
Intersection: 600 South / 400 West Date:5-10-24, Fri
North/South Road: 600 South Day of Week Adjustment:100.0%
East/West Road: 400 West Month of Year Adjustment:100.0%
Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Adjustment Station #:0
Project Title: Salt Lake City Arena Revitalization TS Growth Rate:0.0%
Project No: UT24-2765 Number of Years:0
Weather: Clear
AM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
AM PHF:
MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PHF:
PM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 5:00 PM-6:00 PM
PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: 5:00 PM-5:15 PM
PM PHF: 0.98
0
400 West
2649
Total Entering Vehicles
400 West
0
0
0 120 22
136 142
Legend
Midday
PM
278
SUMMARY
600 South
Northbound
Left Thru Right Peds
600 South
Southbound
Left Thru Right Peds
400 West
Eastbound
Left Thru Right Peds
400 West
Westbound
Left Thru Right Peds
TOTAL
Period A B C D
7:00 - 7:15 0 0 0 0
7:15 - 7:30 0 0 0 0
7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0
7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0
8:00 - 8:15 0 0 0 0
8:15 - 8:30 0 0 0 0
8:30 - 8:45 0 0 0 0
8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MIDDAY PERIOD COUNTS
Period A B C D
9:00 - 9:15 0 0 0 0
9:15 - 9:30 0 0 0 0
9:30 - 9:45 0 0 0 0
9:45 - 10:00 0 0 0 0
10:00 - 10:15 0 0 0 0
10:15 - 10:30 0 0 0 0
10:30 - 10:45 0 0 0 0
10:45 - 11:00 0 0 0 0
11:00 - 11:15 0 0 0 0
11:15 - 11:30 0 0 0 0
11:30 - 11:45 0 0 0 0
11:45 - 12:00 0 0 0 0
12:00 - 12:15 0 0 0 0
12:15 - 12:30 0 0 0 0
12:30 - 12:45 0 0 0 0
12:45 - 13:00 0 0 0 0
13:00 - 13:15 0 0 0 0
13:15 - 13:30 0 0 0 0
13:30 - 13:45 0 0 0 0
13:45 - 14:00 0 0 0 0
14:00 - 14:15 0 0 0 0
14:15 - 14:30 0 0 0 0
14:30 - 14:45 0 0 0 0P14:P4E5R-I1O5D:0C0 OUNTS0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
15:00 - 15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Period A B C D
1175::0105 - 1157::3105 0 404 06 0
1175::1350 - 1157::4350 0 201 05 0
1175::3405 - 1167::0405 0 309 08 0
17:45 - 18:00 0 16 3 0
18:00 - 18:15 0 17 7 0
18:15 - 18:30 0 15 5 0
18:30 - 18:45 0 15 6 0
18:45 - 19:00 0 17 5 0
E F G H
205 101 0 0
108 08 0 0
107 101 0 0
16 6 0 0
16 9 0 0
9 10 0 0
15 5 0 0
14 7 0 0
I J K L
107 5207 202 0
904 5600 202 0
806 5202 302 0
82 571 24 0
91 524 29 0
90 518 28 0
90 508 23 0
88 543 17 0
M N O P0 0 0 0
0 0 01 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
7042
7029
7015
719
694
675
663
691
0
2649
2
0
0
2
2280
2278
0
491112
603
60
0
S
o
u
t
h
60
0
S
o
u
t
h
N
0 36 76
377
1869
141
15
3877
AM
Traffic Count Solutions LLC
801.505.9052
Intersection Turning Movement Summary
Intersection: 600 South / 300 West Date:5-10-24, Fri
North/South Road: 600 South Day of Week Adjustment:100.0%
East/West Road: 300 West Month of Year Adjustment:100.0%
Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Adjustment Station #:0
Project Title: Salt Lake City Arena Revitalization TS Growth Rate:0.0%
Project No: UT24-2765 Number of Years:0
Weather: Clear
AM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
AM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
AM PHF:
MIDDAY PEAK HOUR PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: -
MIDDAY PHF:
PM PEAK HOUR PERIOD: 5:00 PM-6:00 PM
PM PEAK 15 MINUTE PERIOD: 5:00 PM-5:15 PM
PM PHF: 0.93
300 West
2
2387
Total Entering Vehicles
300 West
17
12
2 524 236
626 762
Legend
Midday
PM
1388
SUMMARY
600 South
Northbound
Left Thru Right Peds
600 South
Southbound
Left Thru Right Peds
300 West
Eastbound
Left Thru Right Peds
300 West
Westbound
Left Thru Right Peds
TOTAL
Period A B C D
7:00 - 7:15 0 0 0 0
7:15 - 7:30 0 0 0 0
7:30 - 7:45 0 0 0 0
7:45 - 8:00 0 0 0 0
8:00 - 8:15 0 0 0 0
8:15 - 8:30 0 0 0 0
8:30 - 8:45 0 0 0 0
8:45 - 9:00 0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MIDDAY PERIOD COUNTS
Period A B C D
9:00 - 9:15 0 0 0 0
9:15 - 9:30 0 0 0 0
9:30 - 9:45 0 0 0 0
9:45 - 10:00 0 0 0 0
10:00 - 10:15 0 0 0 0
10:15 - 10:30 0 0 0 0
10:30 - 10:45 0 0 0 0
10:45 - 11:00 0 0 0 0
11:00 - 11:15 0 0 0 0
11:15 - 11:30 0 0 0 0
11:30 - 11:45 0 0 0 0
11:45 - 12:00 0 0 0 0
12:00 - 12:15 0 0 0 0
12:15 - 12:30 0 0 0 0
12:30 - 12:45 0 0 0 0
12:45 - 13:00 0 0 0 0
13:00 - 13:15 0 0 0 0
13:15 - 13:30 0 0 0 0
13:30 - 13:45 0 0 0 0
13:45 - 14:00 0 0 0 0
14:00 - 14:15 0 0 0 0
14:15 - 14:30 0 0 0 0
14:30 - 14:45 0 0 0 0
E F G H
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
I J K L
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
M N O P
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P14:P4E5R-I1O5D:0C0 OUNTS0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15:P00er-io1d5:15 A0 B0 C0 D0
1175::0105 - 1157::3105 01 1406 607 03
1175::1350 - 1157::4350 01 1402 606 04
1175::3405 - 1167::0405 0 1106 403 01
17:45 - 18:00 0 120 60 4
18:00 - 18:15 0 116 44 3
18:15 - 18:30 0 116 48 0
18:30 - 18:45 0 92 25 4
18:45 - 19:00 0 78 45 1
E0 F0 G0 H0
507 1201 0 03
606 1507 0 02
502 108 0 07
68 99 0 3
52 92 0 1
61 116 0 6
40 100 0 15
46 103 0 10
I0 0J K0 L0
902 5014 402 0
901 4028 301 103
809 4077 307 0
105 450 31 4
118 467 39 5
89 426 29 20
76 472 35 17
90 455 37 8
M0 N0 O0 P0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 04
0 0 0 01
0 0 0 7
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4
0 0 0 3
0 0 0 2
TO0TAL
10040
9082
9022
933
928
885
840
854
12
2389
0
0
0
0
2348
2348
901728
1629
60
0
S
o
u
t
h
60
0
S
o
u
t
h
N
0 485 243
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 300 W (John Stockton Dr) -- 600N QC JOB #: 16615001
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
418 536 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 3.3 4.1
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
118 280 20 5.1 2.9 0
760 82 13 208 2.9 4.9 7.7 1.4
143 0.93 176 2.1 1.1
619 394 19 181 1.9 1.3 0 1.7
467 438 22 3 3.9 0
695 927 1.9 3.3
4 0 0 0
1 0
3 12 0 0
0 0
8 0 1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Northbound)300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Southbound)600N(Eastbound)600N(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 124 145 7 0 2 55 39 0 19 34 96 1 3 55 7 0 587
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
135 111 4 1
103 101 3 1
103 81 8 0
3 65 27 1
9 87 25 1
2 73 27 2
25 39 107 0
18 35 91 0
19 35 100 0
6 39 0 0
5 42 3 0
5 40 3 0
563
524
498 2172
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
106 61 5 0
98 73 6 0645681
72 74 8 2
0 74 25 1
2 70 22 01 65 8 0
4 59 14 0
19 24 92 0
14 41 97 021 30 91 0
15 26 94 0
4 36 0 0
2 27 1 054030
24 26 0 0
447
453393
418
2032
19221791
1711
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
496 580 28 0
4 16 0
0
0 0 0
8 220 156 0
0 4 0
0
0 0 0
76 136 384 4
0 8 0
4
0 0 0
12 220 28 0
0 0 4
8
0 0 0
2348
36
12
0
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 200 W -- North Temple QC JOB #: 16615004
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
113 85 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2.7 7.1
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
51 30 32 2 3.3 3.1
684 55 22 636 2.8 9.1 0 2.8
542 0.93 588 3 3.1
625 28 26 589 3.4 0 0 2.9
29 18 15 0 5.6 0
78 62 1.3 1.6
44 0 9 0
0 1
14 11 3 8
1 1
26 0 6 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
200 W(Northbound)200 W(Southbound)North Temple(Eastbound)North Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 8 6 4 0 9 6 19 2 7 139 10 2 6 162 5 2 387
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
6 3 3 0
6 5 4 09440
9 9 8 2
7 5 17 11 10 7 1
9 129 7 4
7 144 6 91613051
6 158 3 2
1 127 5 2714190
358
346345 1436
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
8 0 3 0
6 5 6 09570
6 4 7 1
3 3 12 1
9 2 13 45 4 16 0
5 6 17 0
4 138 3 6
9 102 8 8713946
6 122 7 3
5 140 3 1
10 164 9 11112650
3 144 2 2
330
356344
335
1379
13771375
1365
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
32 24 16 0
0 4 0
16
0 4 0
36 24 76 8
0 0 4
40
0 4 0
28 556 40 8
4 16 0
12
0 4 0
24 648 20 8
0 16 0
12
0 4 0
1548
44
80
16
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: West Temple -- North Temple QC JOB #: 16615005
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
66 86 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 7.6 1.2
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
16 38 12 31.3 0 0
645 20 17 450 2.8 5 0 2.2
436 0.96 429 2.3 2.3
556 100 4 514 3.1 6 0 1.9
199 51 66 1.5 0 0
143 316 4.2 0.9
46 4 4 0
0 0
50 132 4 8
4 0
51 1 4 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
West Temple(Northbound)West Temple(Southbound)North Temple(Eastbound)North Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 55 15 20 1 3 10 4 0 2 107 22 1 0 118 3 0 361
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
59 9 12 0
42 10 18 04217160
2 9 4 0
4 7 3 03 12 5 0
4 113 28 0
7 107 32 15109180
2 108 7 0
2 94 5 0010920
357
332338 1388
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
37 14 13 1
48 11 13 14010130
42 24 12 0
4 6 2 0
1 9 8 02 9 6 0
1 6 3 0
5 115 34 3
6 106 31 05117190
10 99 34 1
2 107 3 0
2 121 6 0010050
2 106 7 0
346
363326
347
1373
13791373
1382
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
220 60 80 4
4 0 0
36
0 0 0
12 40 16 0
0 0 4
52
0 16 0
8 428 88 4
0 12 4
104
0 4 4
0 472 12 0
0 8 0
92
0 4 0
1444
32
284
28
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: State St -- North Temple/2nd Ave QC JOB #: 16615006
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
563 801 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0.7 0.2
Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM
13 383 167 0 0.8 0.6
710 35 127 395 3.8 0 0 2
250 0.94 221 1.2 2.3
718 433 47 510 2.4 3.2 6.4 0.8
473 642 93 4.7 0.3 0
863 1208 2.3 2
24 0 1 0
0 0
29 28 3 6
3 6
13 0 0 6
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
State St(Northbound)State St(Southbound)North Temple/2nd Ave(Eastbound)North Temple/2nd Ave(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 118 171 23 0 36 115 4 0 9 55 110 0 13 72 42 0 768
5:15 PM 131 191 26 0 40 73 5 0 12 70 107 0 14 61 41 0 771
5:30 PM5:45 PM 111 149 24 0113 131 20 0 46 91 1 045 104 3 0 5 68 107 06 57 109 3 11 46 19 0942250 678667 2884
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
105 134 17 1
126 137 29 1
85 115 18 0
83 124 17 0
34 105 3 0
49 87 2 0
46 102 1 0
33 95 1 0
11 53 98 0
6 55 112 1
9 65 121 0
7 63 100 1
8 44 14 0
17 48 22 0
9 44 24 0
13 35 16 0
627
692
639
588
2743
2664
2625
2546
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
524 764 104 0
20 0 0
20
0 0 8
160 292 20 0
0 4 0
24
0 0 0
48 280 428 0
0 8 8
44
0 8 4
56 244 164 0
4 0 0
20
4 4 0
3084
44
108
28
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 400 W -- South Temple QC JOB #: 16615007
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
265 211 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0 0.9
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
0 236 29 0 0 0
0 0 35 111 0 0 0 9
0 0.88 0 0 0
0 0 76 89 0 0 13.2 11.2
11 174 61 0 1.1 16.4
322 246 3.1 4.9
36 0 7 3
0 3
63 3 0 0
0 3
27 0 11 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
400 W(Northbound)400 W(Southbound)South Temple(Eastbound)South Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 0 46 18 2 8 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 7 1 177
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 45 14 1
0 50 15 5
0 33 14 3
4 60 0 1
9 49 0 1
6 57 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
21 0 8 0
10 0 14 0
19 0 6 0
154
153
138 622
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
0 46 14 4
0 45 9 2
0 36 5 5
0 52 14 2
6 62 0 1
5 70 0 1
7 57 0 0
5 61 0 3
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
19 0 8 1
11 0 10 0
11 0 7 0
15 0 14 0
161
153
128
166
606
605
580
608
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
0 184 72 8
0 4 12
52
0 12 0
32 280 0 0
0 0 0
8
8 12 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
92
0 0 0
100 0 28 4
12 0 0
4
8 0 0
708
28
156
40
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: John Stockton Dr -- South Temple QC JOB #: 16615008
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
737 691 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0.9 2.2
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
16 637 84 0 0.5 4.8
109 0 93 281 9.2 0 5.4 6
54 0.86 81 18.5 12.3
93 39 107 250 10.8 0 1.9 6
16 597 110 0 1.7 0.9
784 723 0.6 1.5
38 1 4 1
0 0
104 24 5 5
0 1
44 1 5 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
John Stockton Dr(Northbound)John Stockton Dr(Southbound)South Temple(Eastbound)South Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 5 170 32 0 18 208 2 0 0 13 10 0 23 23 27 1 532
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
2 176 25 1
3 134 28 2
2 117 25 1
16 140 7 0
21 160 3 1
28 129 4 0
0 12 5 0
0 14 9 0
0 15 15 0
34 22 21 0
18 18 17 2
29 18 28 0
461
430
411 1834
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
6 108 27 0
3 105 34 3
4 95 29 0
9 119 32 1
12 163 5 0
16 159 4 0
18 121 3 2
15 148 5 1
0 13 5 0
0 11 3 0
0 9 3 0
0 12 3 0
27 17 14 0
28 16 19 0
28 13 12 0
22 16 25 1
397
401
337
409
1699
1639
1546
1544
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
20 680 128 0
0 8 0
72
0 0 0
72 832 8 0
4 8 0
56
0 0 4
0 52 40 0
0 12 0
124
0 12 0
92 92 108 4
0 12 4
40
0 4 0
2128
48
292
20
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 200 W -- South Temple QC JOB #: 16615009
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
76 81 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 1.3 1.2
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
6 45 25 0 2.2 0
261 16 34 355 6.5 0 2.9 5.6
213 0.89 250 6.1 6.8
250 21 71 292 5.6 4.8 2.8 4.5
4 32 31 0 0 0
114 67 3.5 0
24 0 8 1
0 0
26 7 3 4
0 1
83 0 2 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
200 W(Northbound)200 W(Southbound)South Temple(Eastbound)South Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 1 8 11 0 6 17 4 0 4 59 8 0 12 69 6 6 211
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
1 12 8 0
0 8 4 0
2 4 8 0
8 12 1 0
6 7 0 0
5 9 1 0
2 48 4 0
3 50 5 0
6 56 4 1
17 56 11 6
11 63 9 4
8 62 8 7
186
170
181 748
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM6:45 PM
2 11 10 0
0 9 12 0
0 6 14 01570
4 10 0 0
6 8 1 0
5 4 1 04 8 2 0
1 42 6 1
7 54 4 0
3 49 7 034750
12 60 8 2
20 48 6 7
7 52 1 366823
169
182
152161
706
702
684664
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
4 32 44 0
0 0 0
140
0 4 0
24 68 16 0
0 0 0
12
0 4 0
16 236 32 0
0 12 0
40
0 4 0
48 276 24 24
0 16 0
16
0 4 0
844
28
208
16
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: West Temple -- South Temple QC JOB #: 16615010
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
211 352 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2.4 2
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
17 122 72 0 1.6 4.2
340 0 114 316 5.6 0 2.6 2.2
239 0.87 199 5.4 2
304 65 3 426 4.6 1.5 0 3.8
126 238 112 11.9 1.7 0
189 476 1.6 4
40 0 3 3
0 3
88 85 8 8
0 0
85 4 0 3
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
West Temple(Northbound)West Temple(Southbound)South Temple(Eastbound)South Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 37 79 35 1 16 44 5 0 0 61 26 0 0 44 28 1 377
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
36 58 21 1
27 54 23 0
24 47 33 0
23 36 2 0
18 13 4 0
15 29 6 0
0 62 10 0
0 57 9 0
0 59 20 0
0 45 35 1
0 58 26 1
0 52 25 0
330
290
310 1307
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
22 58 34 2
27 51 35 2
20 52 27 1
33 50 33 1
12 28 4 0
14 30 3 0
16 21 3 0
12 23 0 0
0 43 19 0
0 64 19 0
0 44 24 0
0 51 15 0
0 51 27 0
1 55 21 1
0 36 25 0
0 52 20 1
300
323
269
291
1230
1223
1202
1183
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
148 316 140 4
16 4 0
116
4 0 0
64 176 20 0
4 0 0
24
0 8 0
0 244 104 0
0 16 0
84
0 8 0
0 176 112 4
0 0 0
56
0 0 0
1508
40
280
20
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 400 W -- 100 S QC JOB #: 16615011
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
325 242 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2.8 5
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
57 232 36 0 3.9 0
165 31 39 142 0 0 0 0
42 0.88 54 2.4 0
135 62 49 167 1.5 1.6 0 1.2
75 163 93 0 7.4 1.1
359 331 2.8 3.9
31 4 8 1
0 4
98 67 2 2
0 1
75 0 6 3
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
400 W(Northbound)400 W(Southbound)100 S(Eastbound)100 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 9 40 24 9 12 69 17 2 9 16 22 2 8 12 12 3 266
5:15 PM5:30 PM
5:45 PM
18 41 28 51648294
8 34 12 6
4 66 12 63 45 11 3
5 52 17 1
4 7 16 09880
6 11 16 1
8 12 10 3111692
14 14 8 0
240222
205 933
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM6:45 PM
19 40 13 10
17 33 8 9
14 32 12 5114495
2 59 11 3
4 55 15 4
3 54 15 36 39 10 3
8 5 22 0
12 6 22 0
6 7 19 0108160
15 13 6 0
22 13 6 0
14 11 5 0149110
226
226
200195
893
879
857847
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
36 160 96 36
0 16 4
76
0 8 0
48 276 68 8
0 0 0
44
0 16 0
36 64 88 8
0 4 4
96
0 4 0
32 48 48 12
0 0 0
56
0 4 0
1064
28
272
32
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 300 W (John Stockton Dr) -- 100 S QC JOB #: 16615012
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
782 728 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0.6 1.6
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
76 683 23 0 0.6 4.3
166 32 20 68 0 0 5 2.9
27 0.83 11 0 0
168 109 37 110 1.2 1.8 2.7 1.8
126 677 62 0 1.6 1.6
879 865 0.8 1.4
18 3 3 0
3 1
48 43 5 1
1 0
39 1 1 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Northbound)300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Southbound)100 S(Eastbound)100 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 21 202 17 14 6 219 18 2 5 10 33 1 9 3 4 0 564
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
20 177 17 12
20 159 17 8151391116
5 164 11 0
6 161 25 04139220
6 7 27 2
10 3 26 087230
9 2 8 0
9 3 3 010350
467
450402 1883
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
22 128 18 8
19 125 14 512127107
18 143 21 8
5 179 19 1
3 167 25 03129191
5 145 7 2
9 3 12 0
8 5 12 053210
6 6 16 0
8 4 5 0
12 1 6 09210
8 3 3 0
421
402349
391
1740
16751574
1563
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
84 808 68 56
0 8 0
16
0 4 0
24 876 72 8
0 8 0
0
0 0 0
20 40 132 4
0 0 8
24
0 4 4
36 12 16 0
0 0 0
32
0 4 0
2256
24
72
16
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 200 W -- 100 S QC JOB #: 16615013
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
117 72 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 3.4 2.8
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
12 105 0 8.3 2.9 0
32 23 1 8 6.3 8.7 0 12.5
4 0.80 5 50 20
95 68 2 4 4.2 0 0 50
18 48 0 0 0 0
178 66 1.7 0
2 2 9 0
0 0
19 13 0 0
4 0
33 4 4 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
200 W(Northbound)200 W(Southbound)100 S(Eastbound)100 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 7 13 0 0 0 33 5 0 7 1 20 0 2 1 0 0 89
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
3 14 0 1
3 10 0 1
2 11 0 1
0 32 2 0
0 23 1 0
0 17 4 0
6 2 14 0
4 1 17 0
6 0 17 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 1 0
75
62
60 286
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM6:45 PM
8 18 0 1
5 13 0 1
3 18 0 12800
0 21 4 0
0 30 3 0
0 12 7 00 16 4 0
1 1 8 0
5 1 14 0
3 0 14 031160
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 00000
62
72
5850
259
256
252242
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
28 52 0 0
0 0 0
48
0 12 0
0 132 20 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 0
28 4 80 0
0 0 0
32
0 0 4
8 4 0 0
0 0 0
8
0 0 0
356
0
88
16
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: West Temple -- 100 S QC JOB #: 16615014
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
384 519 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0.8 4
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
0 357 27 0 0.8 0
0 0 172 405 0 0 9.9 4.9
0 0.80 0 0 0
0 0 233 163 0 0 1.3 1.8
4 328 153 0 1.2 2
592 485 1 1.4
78 0 2 1
0 3
96 120 0 0
0 4
33 0 9 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
West Temple(Northbound)West Temple(Southbound)100 S(Eastbound)100 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 0 107 37 1 5 127 0 5 0 0 0 0 64 0 51 1 398
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0 71 32 0
0 66 43 3
0 84 41 0
2 90 0 2
0 56 0 6
1 84 0 6
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
65 0 43 0
59 0 46 1
43 0 32 0
305
280
291 1274
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
0 97 44 0
0 83 44 1
0 84 36 0
0 88 45 1
1 81 0 6
3 82 0 5
1 71 0 5
0 53 0 5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
50 0 42 1
52 0 45 0
55 0 38 0
56 0 37 1
322
315
290
286
1198
1208
1218
1213
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
0 428 148 4
0 0 0
36
0 12 0
20 508 0 20
0 0 0
76
0 4 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
76
0 0 0
256 0 204 4
4 0 24
96
4 0 4
1592
28
284
24
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 400 W -- 200 S QC JOB #: 16615015
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
383 281 Peak-Hour: 6:00 PM -- 7:00 PM 3.9 4.6
Peak 15-Min: 6:15 PM -- 6:30 PM
78 266 39 16.7 0.8 0
381 72 28 162 5.5 13.9 0 1.9
115 0.93 112 1.7 2.7
253 66 22 199 6.3 6.1 0 1
172 195 49 2.9 1.5 0
353 416 1.7 1.9
82 13 10 4
8 1
57 73 17 11
6 0
23 1 2 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
400 W(Northbound)400 W(Southbound)200 S(Eastbound)200 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
35 53 10 0
38 58 13 0
27 67 12 1
30 40 10 0
8 68 19 3
9 81 20 1
8 52 14 1
11 53 25 1
10 28 16 5
10 22 10 7
11 22 15 2
6 19 13 5
7 35 15 0
7 32 13 1
3 30 16 0
6 37 13 0
312
322
281
269 1184
6:00 PM 36 57 18 0 13 71 20 1 15 21 11 4 5 33 7 0 312 1184
6:15 PM 51 45 11 0 9 73 22 1 12 33 23 7 3 27 10 1 328 1190
6:30 PM6:45 PM 47 48 10 03845100 8 69 17 04 53 19 3 10 33 17 31628155 6 27 6 072550 301273 12101214
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
204 180 44 0
4 0 0
16
0 0 0
36 292 88 4
0 4 8
120
16 16 20
48 132 92 28
8 8 4
52
0 8 4
12 108 40 4
0 4 0
80
0 12 0
1312
40
268
76
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 300 W (John Stockton Dr) -- 200 S QC JOB #: 16615016
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
909 853 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0.8 1.3
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
75 732 102 0 1 0
244 36 87 356 0.4 0 2.3 1.1
69 0.84 95 1.4 1.1
172 67 174 239 1.2 1.5 0.6 0.4
92 715 83 0 1.3 0
991 890 0.9 1
24 0 2 2
0 1
55 24 11 22
1 1
63 0 3 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Northbound)300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Southbound)200 S(Eastbound)200 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 25 192 21 6 26 231 21 4 10 20 21 0 57 20 36 0 690
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
13 202 23 4
18 171 16 518 150 23 3
15 187 18 5
23 162 18 523 152 18 1
9 16 18 0
10 14 17 0719110
50 31 22 0
35 18 14 03226150
613
526498 2327
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
21 154 27 2
23 142 18 716 134 15 4
19 160 24 5
18 178 11 5
16 162 8 316 157 8 3
20 145 7 9
12 17 22 0
8 22 26 01322160
14 21 16 0
41 18 14 0
33 16 21 03619191
21 15 22 1
540
505479
499
2177
20692022
2023
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
100 768 84 24
0 4 0
36
0 4 0
104 924 84 16
0 16 0
36
0 0 0
40 80 84 0
0 4 0
24
0 8 0
228 80 144 0
0 0 4
4
0 12 0
2760
28
100
24
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 200 W -- 200 S QC JOB #: 16615017
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
168 67 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0.6 0
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
48 80 40 2.1 0 0
285 9 25 262 0.4 0 0 0
185 0.90 225 0 0
234 40 12 292 0 0 0 0
12 33 66 0 0 0
131 111 0 0
106 1 4 10
0 3
34 55 19 38
5 5
101 6 3 4
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
200 W(Northbound)200 W(Southbound)200 S(Eastbound)200 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 4 12 21 0 3 31 12 0 2 36 12 0 1 72 9 1 216
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
1 5 9 0
6 6 23 0110130
14 13 9 0
16 18 14 07 18 13 0
3 48 14 0
1 48 12 035320
4 56 2 0
2 41 8 045660
178
195186 775
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
2 8 26 1
6 14 24 0117170
2 22 23 0
8 23 8 0
15 19 7 06 13 9 0
12 22 9 0
1 35 11 0
1 39 7 0442100
8 47 6 0
2 44 5 0
1 43 9 145390
3 54 8 0
174
186185
216
733
741731
761
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
16 48 84 0
0 0 0
104
8 0 12
12 124 48 0
0 0 4
124
12 8 0
8 144 48 0
0 0 0
32
0 20 0
4 288 36 4
0 0 0
56
16 12 0
864
4
316
88
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: West Temple -- 200 S QC JOB #: 16615018
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
613 495 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 1.3 1.4
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
75 483 55 2.7 1 1.8
260 40 92 276 1.5 0 0 0.7
82 0.87 126 0 1.6
193 71 58 345 0.5 1.4 0 0.3
56 366 205 0 1.9 0
609 627 1 1.1
109 1 8 0
3 1
94 118 7 13
5 6
131 4 10 1
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
West Temple(Northbound)West Temple(Southbound)200 S(Eastbound)200 S(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 15 106 53 0 20 140 24 0 9 26 17 1 15 35 27 1 489
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
11 80 49 0
19 82 50 0
11 98 53 0
9 132 28 0
11 110 9 0
15 101 14 0
10 17 16 1
9 16 20 1
9 23 18 0
23 34 27 1
9 31 18 1
8 26 20 0
438
386
396 1709
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
21 113 53 0
9 107 64 0
19 97 54 0
23 123 54 0
20 119 18 3
13 98 33 1
21 85 22 1
12 96 20 0
5 15 22 0
18 18 15 0
7 14 10 1
14 20 13 0
3 27 22 0
3 35 17 0
6 36 23 1
7 29 28 0
441
431
397
439
1661
1654
1665
1708
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
60 424 212 0
0 4 0
124
12 12 0
80 560 96 0
0 0 4
112
0 8 0
36 104 68 4
0 0 0
88
0 12 0
60 140 108 4
0 0 0
124
0 4 0
1956
8
448
48
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 400 W -- 400 S (University Blvd)QC JOB #: 16615019
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
435 411 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 1.4 1
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
62 285 88 4.8 1.1 0
1464 78 66 1405 2.1 5.1 0 1.6
1022 0.91 1276 1.4 1.7
1144 44 63 1192 1.8 6.8 1.6 1.2
129 267 79 4.7 0 0
392 475 1.8 1.3
18 0 3 2
0 0
30 31 1 3
0 0
15 1 8 2
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
400 W(Northbound)400 W(Southbound)400 S (University Blvd)(Eastbound)400 S (University Blvd)(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 35 67 22 3 26 82 17 0 19 262 15 0 22 357 27 0 954
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
30 74 27 0
26 64 12 03562180
21 81 22 0
25 62 14 016 60 9 0
24 242 9 0
18 256 5 017262150
11 357 13 2
18 319 12 09243141
913
831761 3459
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
25 63 9 0
24 68 7 21563111
25 65 9 1
22 60 16 0
23 64 22 017 55 14 0
21 53 17 1
30 253 5 0
24 249 5 02824990
27 257 7 0
6 237 18 0
8 240 18 07188210
13 226 6 0
744
754678
728
3249
30902937
2904
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
140 268 88 12
12 0 0
28
0 16 0
104 328 68 0
0 4 4
16
0 0 0
76 1048 60 0
8 20 4
28
0 0 0
88 1428 108 0
0 24 0
20
0 0 0
3816
76
92
16
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:26 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 300 W (John Stockton Dr) -- 400 S (University Blvd)QC JOB #: 16615020
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
955 921 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 1 1.4
Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM
153 687 115 0.7 1.2 0.9
1399 94 145 1287 1.7 1.1 1.4 1.7
926 0.90 1063 1.3 1.9
1180 160 79 1156 1.2 0.6 0 1.2
192 681 113 1.6 1.5 0.9
932 986 1 1.4
16 1 1 1
2 0
15 23 6 2
4 0
13 2 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Northbound)300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Southbound)400 S (University Blvd)(Eastbound)400 S (University Blvd)(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 52 184 23 2 35 206 40 0 21 246 50 0 21 315 29 0 1224
5:15 PM
5:30 PM5:45 PM
52 177 27 2
36 145 18 243 175 45 3
23 186 58 0
34 145 37 022 150 18 1
31 212 36 0
16 245 37 026223370
24 261 47 0
19 273 36 212214331
1136
10451003 4408
6:00 PM
6:15 PM6:30 PM
6:45 PM
50 162 23 2
44 154 24 129 137 22 0
22 155 28 2
31 160 20 0
29 167 29 032 141 17 0
38 124 19 0
19 228 40 0
23 204 44 023245450
20 226 40 0
25 211 34 1
18 193 23 131196251
15 167 34 2
1006
954944
892
4190
40083907
3796
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
208 736 92 8
0 4 4
16
8 0 0
140 824 160 0
0 16 4
12
0 4 0
84 984 200 0
0 16 4
12
0 8 4
84 1260 116 0
0 28 4
28
0 0 0
4896
80
68
24
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:27 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: State St -- 400 S (University Blvd)QC JOB #: 16615021
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 10 2024
1044 1033 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2.6 2.4Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM
114 830 100 0 2.7 5
1176 101 94 1098 0.9 5 10.6 2
671 0.93 889 1 1
1004 232 115 860 1.3 0.4 2.6 1.6
164 837 92 0.6 1.2 2.2
1170 1093 2.2 1.2
33 1 0 1
0 1
22 36 12 3
0 0
44 2 0 0
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
State St(Northbound)State St(Southbound)400 S (University Blvd)(Eastbound)400 S (University Blvd)(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 52 203 23 0 15 189 21 2 30 182 85 2 36 264 23 2 1129
5:15 PM 42 229 28 0 25 245 29 2 23 185 48 2 34 223 27 2 1144
5:30 PM5:45 PM 28 186 22 042 219 19 0 20 205 30 530 191 34 1 19 145 47 120159524 16 237 24 222165201 987979 4239
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
48 193 21 0
49 230 22 0
39 212 27 0
37 197 24 1
17 183 28 4
22 187 28 0
14 170 24 1
19 165 29 1
26 158 43 0
19 140 49 3
25 202 49 3
22 120 58 1
19 186 23 0
25 158 12 1
26 162 15 3
19 147 17 3
949
945
972
860
4059
3860
3845
3726
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
168 916 112 0
4 12 4
60
8 0 0
100 980 116 8
8 20 0
32
0 0 4
92 740 192 8
4 12 0
32
0 4 0
136 892 108 8
0 8 12
60
0 0 0
4576
84
184
16
Comments:
Report generated on 5/22/2024 8:27 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: N 400 W -- North Temple QC JOB #: 16615002
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 17 2024
400 379 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2.3 2.9
Peak 15-Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM
44 255 101 2.3 0.4 6.9
419 28 147 505 2.9 0 5.4 3.8
297 0.94 310 1.7 3.5
395 70 48 464 1.3 0 0 2.6
70 200 70 0 1.5 0
378 340 0.3 0.9
75 1 4 4
0 1
58 53 7 1
0 0
10 1 0 4
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N 400 W(Northbound)N 400 W(Southbound)North Temple(Eastbound)North Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM5:15 PM 15 54 16 02254164 19 45 16 218 56 6 1 3 74 26 0486100 12 80 26 01391450 388426
5:30 PM 14 52 22 1 33 78 18 0 17 63 20 0 11 64 41 0 434
5:45 PM 14 40 16 0 27 76 4 1 4 74 14 0 12 75 35 0 392 1640
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
9 32 23 2
7 55 15 1
6 45 33 0
10 58 32 4
21 89 7 0
24 95 9 3
27 86 12 2
23 76 7 2
10 68 9 0
8 75 9 0
7 66 12 1
14 56 9 0
16 56 22 0
13 71 39 0
15 54 23 0
14 59 25 0
364
424
389
389
1616
1614
1569
1566
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
56 208 88 4
0 8 0
12
4 0 4
132 312 72 0
4 4 0
48
0 0 0
68 252 80 0
0 0 0
28
0 12 0
44 256 164 0
0 8 4
40
0 4 0
1736
28
128
24
Comments:
Report generated on 6/12/2024 9:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
Page 1 of 1
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume
LOCATION: 300 W (John Stockton Dr) -- North Temple QC JOB #: 16615003
CITY/STATE: Salt Lake City, UT DATE: Fri, May 17 2024
836 1023 Peak-Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 1.6 1.8Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM
45 499 292 0 1.4 2.1
498 59 380 889 4 0 3.2 4.2
253 0.96 312 4.3 5.8
481 169 197 615 2.5 0.6 3.6 2.9
144 580 75 1.4 1 1.3
869 799 1.7 1.1
74 0 0 1
2 2
54 142 11 3
0 0
28 2 1 2
N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Northbound)300 W (John Stockton Dr)(Southbound)North Temple(Eastbound)North Temple(Westbound)15-Min Count Period Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total Hourly Totals
5:00 PM 31 170 15 1 63 97 14 2 16 63 48 1 47 74 106 1 749
5:15 PM 39 159 24 2 57 121 15 2 14 51 46 1 55 91 106 0 783
5:30 PM5:45 PM 39 142 16 229109201 80 148 5 285 133 11 1 17 64 38 1975370 43 80 76 05067921 753720 3005
6:00 PM
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
21 76 29 4
28 94 21 4
25 86 27 5
27 81 28 4
80 166 13 2
82 167 16 2
80 176 21 3
85 184 17 1
13 57 28 2
8 79 29 0
18 75 39 2
9 71 32 1
49 60 62 4
42 78 80 3
36 49 64 1
36 61 57 2
666
733
707
696
2922
2872
2826
2802
Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPeak 15-Min Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total
All Vehicles
Heavy Trucks
Buses
Pedestrians
BicyclesScooters
156 636 96 8
4 8 0
28
4 0 8
228 484 60 8
4 8 0
56
4 0 0
56 204 184 4
0 4 0
32
0 16 0
220 364 424 0
4 12 4
64
0 4 4
3132
48
180
40
Comments:
Report generated on 6/12/2024 9:05 AM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212
APPENDIX C
LOS Results
SimTraffic Queueing Report
Project: Salt Lake City Arena Revitalization TS
Analysis: Existing (2024) Background - No Event
Time Period: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
95th Percentile Queue Length (feet) - Rounded Up to Nearest Multiple of 25 ft Project #: UT24-2765
NB SB EB WB
Intersection L LT R T TR UT L R T TR L LT R T TR L LR LT R T TR
01: 300 West John Stockton Drive & 600 North 225 200 50 150 75 100 100 125 75 125
02: 400 West & North Temple 100 100 125 125 150 125 75 125 150 75 100 150
03: 400 West & South Temple 75 75 50 75 75 75
04: 400 West & 100 South 75 75 100 50 100 125 50 75 75 50 75
05: 400 West & 200 South 125 100 75 75 100 125 75 75 100 50 75 75
06: 400 West & 400 South (University Blvd)100 100 150 100 100 150 225 175 275 150 75 150 150
07: 400 West & 500 South 150 175 125 100 125 100 50 150
08: 400 West & 600 South 75 175 125 50 200 325 75 325
09: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & North Temple 125 100 125 200 125 100 75 100 175 150 150 150
10: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & South Temple 50 75 125 100 150 150 100 175 150
11: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 100 South 100 100 100 50 100 125 75 50 75 75 50 50
12: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 200 South 100 175 200 75 100 125 75 75 125 150 100 125
13: 300 West & 400 South (University Blvd)200 125 225 150 150 250 100 175 150 100 275 175
14: 300 West & 500 South 175 250 150 225 175 150 100 375
15: 300 West & 600 South 200 325 200 175 325 100 300 175
16: 200 West & North Temple 75 50 50 75 75 50 100 50 125 100
17: 200 West & South Temple 50 75 50 75 50 150 75 150
18: 200 West & 100 South 50 75 75 50 75
19: 200 South & 200 West 50 125 100 50 50 50 50 50 50 100 100
20: West Temple & North Temple 175 75 100 75 50 100 150 125 150
21: West Temple & South Temple 100 100 125 75 50 75 200 75 125
22: West Temple & 100 South 125 125 100 100 100 75
23: West Temple & 200 South 100 150 125 100 100 100 75 50 75 50 100 100
24: State Street & North Temple/2nd Avenue 225 300 275 225 300 75 150 300 100 150 125
25: State Street & 400 South (University Blvd)175 275 175 125 275 150 200 100 300 175 75 275
SimTraffic Queueing Report
Project: Salt Lake City Arena Revitalization TS
Analysis: Existing (2024) Event Ingress
Time Period: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
95th Percentile Queue Length (feet) - Rounded Up to Nearest Multiple of 25 ft Project #: UT24-2765
NB SB EB WB
Intersection L LT R T TR UT L R T TR L LT R T TR L LR LT R T TR
01: 300 West John Stockton Drive & 600 North 300 550 50 250 150 100 275 200 75 125
02: 400 West & North Temple 75 150 175 125 175 175 75 125 200 250 75 175
03: 400 West & South Temple 125 125 250
04: 400 West & 100 South 150 100 125 100 225 250 75 75 75 50 75
05: 400 West & 200 South 125 125 75 75 125 175 75 75 75 50 100 125
06: 400 West & 400 South (University Blvd)150 75 125 125 200 175 250 175 375 200 75 100 100
07: 400 West & 500 South 125 200 150 100 150 75 50 100
08: 400 West & 600 South 75 200 100 50 275 400 75 375
09: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & North Temple 100 200 175 275 125 150 75 75 300 175 125 225
11: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 100 South 225 150 100 75 75
12: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 200 South 250 400 250 125 275 125 100 150 175 250 325 200
13: 300 West & 400 South (University Blvd)200 150 275 150 50 200 200 175 175 150 300 200
14: 300 West & 500 South 125 325 125 225 150 125 125 400
15: 300 West & 600 South 175 300 225 175 250 50 250 125
16: 200 West & North Temple 75 75 50 75 75 50 75 75 175 175 100
17: 200 West & South Temple 50 100 100 100 50 125 100
18: 200 West & 100 South 50 150 125 125 75
19: 200 South & 200 West 50 125 100 50 50 100 75 100 50 125 100
20: West Temple & North Temple 175 100 100 50 100 50 75 150 100 225 175
21: West Temple & South Temple 100 100 125 75 50 75 175 75 100
22: West Temple & 100 South 75 100 100 100 100 50
23: West Temple & 200 South 100 125 125 75 100 125 75 100 125 50 125 125
24: State Street & North Temple/2nd Avenue 250 300 250 225 50 275 75 125 275 125 175 150
25: State Street & 400 South (University Blvd)200 300 200 175 325 200 250 100 350 150 75 300
SimTraffic Queueing Report
Project: Salt Lake City Arena Revitilization TS
Analysis: Future (2029) Background - No Event
Time Period: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
95th Percentile Queue Length (feet) - Rounded Up to Nearest Multiple of 25 ft Project #: UT24-2765
NB SB EB WB
Intersection L LT R T TR UT L R T TR L LT R T TR L LR LT R T TR
01: 300 West John Stockton Drive & 600 North 300 600 50 50 150 75 100 150 225 125 250
02: 400 West & North Temple 125 125 125 125 175 175 75 150 175 100 125 125
03: 400 West & South Temple 125 100 75 150 100 75
04: 400 West & 100 South 100 100 125 50 125 175 50 100 75 50 75
05: 400 West & 200 South 150 125 100 50 75 150 75 75 100 50 50 75
06: 400 West & 400 South (University Blvd)125 100 150 125 150 175 250 175 275 175 50 150 125
07: 400 West & 500 South 125 200 150 100 150 100 50 125
08: 400 West & 600 South 75 200 100 50 275 375 50 325
09: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & North Temple 125 100 150 225 150 100 75 75 175 175 150 175
10: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & South Temple 75 100 150 100 125 125 100 150 150
11: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 100 South 75 75 100 50 75 75 50 50 75 75 50
12: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 200 South 100 225 225 100 175 175 75 75 125 125 100 125
13: 300 West & 400 South (University Blvd)200 125 250 175 125 250 75 150 150 150 275 175
14: 300 West & 500 South 125 275 175 250 200 150 100 450
15: 300 West & 600 South 200 325 225 175 250 50 225 125
16: 200 West & North Temple 100 50 50 75 75 50 100 50 75 100
17: 200 West & South Temple 75 50 50 50 50 175 100 150
18: 200 West & 100 South 50 50 75 50 75
19: 200 South & 200 West 50 125 100 75 50 75 100 50 100 100
20: West Temple & North Temple 150 75 100 50 100 50 75 150 150 150
21: West Temple & South Temple 100 100 100 75 50 75 200 50 125
22: West Temple & 100 South 100 125 100 125 100 50
23: West Temple & 200 South 100 150 125 100 100 125 75 50 100 50 75 100
24: State Street & North Temple/2nd Avenue 250 275 250 225 325 75 125 250 150 200 175
25: State Street & 400 South (University Blvd)200 325 200 150 325 225 200 75 300 175 75 275
SimTraffic Queueing Report
Project: Salt Lake City Arena Revitilization TS
Analysis: Future (2029) Event Ingress
Time Period: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
95th Percentile Queue Length (feet) - Rounded Up to Nearest Multiple of 25 ft Project #: UT24-2765
NB SB EB WB
Intersection L LT R T TR UT L R T TR L LT R T TR L LR LT R T TR
01: 300 West John Stockton Drive & 600 North 300 675 50 100 300 225 200 325 550 150 450
02: 400 West & North Temple 75 150 225 150 175 175 100 150 225 225 100 175
03: 400 West & South Temple 125 125 250
04: 400 West & 100 South 175 100 150 100 250 300 100 125 100 50 75
05: 400 West & 200 South 150 150 125 75 125 175 75 75 100 75 125 150
06: 400 West & 400 South (University Blvd)125 75 125 100 150 200 250 150 375 200 75 125 125
07: 400 West & 500 South 150 225 150 125 175 100 75 125
08: 400 West & 600 South 75 200 125 50 300 425 50 425
09: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & North Temple 100 200 175 325 175 150 125 175 275 200 125 250
11: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 100 South 225 150 100 75 75
12: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 200 South 225 400 325 175 300 150 125 150 175 275 425 200
13: 300 West & 400 South (University Blvd)250 150 400 175 75 250 225 175 175 125 300 225
14: 300 West & 500 South 150 300 125 225 150 175 150 425
15: 300 West & 600 South 250 300 225 150 325 75 275 150
16: 200 West & North Temple 75 75 75 75 75 50 75 100 175 150 125
17: 200 West & South Temple 50 125 125 100 75 50 100 100
18: 200 West & 100 South 50 125 125 100 75
19: 200 South & 200 West 50 125 100 50 50 100 75 100 50 125 100
20: West Temple & North Temple 200 150 75 50 75 50 75 175 50 200 200
21: West Temple & South Temple 100 100 125 75 50 75 175 75 75
22: West Temple & 100 South 100 125 100 125 100 50
23: West Temple & 200 South 100 150 200 100 100 125 75 100 125 50 125 125
24: State Street & North Temple/2nd Avenue 250 375 300 225 50 300 100 125 250 125 175 150
25: State Street & 400 South (University Blvd)200 300 200 200 325 200 250 125 375 175 75 350
SimTraffic Queueing Report
Project: Salt Lake City Arena Revitilization TS
Analysis: Future (2050) Background - No Event
Time Period: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
95th Percentile Queue Length (feet) - Rounded Up to Nearest Multiple of 25 ft Project #: UT24-2765
NB SB EB WB
Intersection L LT R T TR UT L R T TR L LT R T TR L LR LT R T TR
01: 300 West John Stockton Drive & 600 North 300 750 50 150 75 100 175 250 125 275
02: 400 West & North Temple 150 125 150 150 175 175 100 175 200 100 125 175
03: 400 West & South Temple 125 125 75 150 100 75
04: 400 West & 100 South 125 100 150 50 125 175 75 125 100 50 100
05: 400 West & 200 South 175 150 125 75 75 175 75 75 125 50 75 100
06: 400 West & 400 South (University Blvd)150 100 225 150 225 300 350 225 375 225 75 175 175
07: 400 West & 500 South 150 200 200 125 225 100 75 150
08: 400 West & 600 South 75 175 100 50 375 500 75 475
09: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & North Temple 150 150 200 275 225 175 100 100 175 225 250 225
10: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & South Temple 100 125 200 150 200 200 150 225 250
11: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 100 South 100 75 100 50 100 125 75 50 100 100 50 50
12: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 200 South 125 250 275 100 150 175 100 100 175 175 125 150
13: 300 West & 400 South (University Blvd)225 125 300 250 175 375 125 250 225 175 325 225
14: 300 West & 500 South 175 300 225 275 250 225 150 57
15: 300 West & 600 South 225 400 250 250 400 125 425 250
16: 200 West & North Temple 75 75 75 100 100 50 150 75 100 100
17: 200 West & South Temple 25 75 75 50 75 50 175 100 200
18: 200 West & 100 South 50 50 75 50 50
19: 200 South & 200 West 50 150 125 50 100 25 75 75 50 125 100
20: West Temple & North Temple 200 150 100 50 100 50 100 175 50 200 225
21: West Temple & South Temple 100 100 125 75 75 75 225 75 150
22: West Temple & 100 South 125 150 100 125 125 75
23: West Temple & 200 South 125 150 150 100 125 125 100 75 100 50 100 100
24: State Street & North Temple/2nd Avenue 300 400 350 250 350 75 150 375 200 250 225
25: State Street & 400 South (University Blvd)175 350 250 225 375 250 250 125 425 175 75 350
SimTraffic Queueing Report
Project: Salt Lake City Arena Revitilization TS
Analysis: Future (2050) Event Ingress
Time Period: 6:00 - 7:00 PM
95th Percentile Queue Length (feet) - Rounded Up to Nearest Multiple of 25 ft Project #: UT24-2765
NB SB EB WB
Intersection L LT R T TR UT L R T TR L LT R T TR L LR LT R T TR
01: 300 West John Stockton Drive & 600 North 300 825 50 75 275 175 150 350 600 150 425
02: 400 West & North Temple 100 175 200 150 225 225 100 200 250 275 100 225
03: 400 West & South Temple 150 125 250
04: 400 West & 100 South 175 125 150 100 225 325 100 125 125 75 100
05: 400 West & 200 South 175 175 150 100 100 200 100 100 125 75 125 150
06: 400 West & 400 South (University Blvd)150 75 150 125 200 225 300 250 475 275 100 225 150
07: 400 West & 500 South 150 225 175 125 200 125 75 125
08: 400 West & 600 South 75 200 125 50 450 550 50 550
09: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & North Temple 150 225 250 150 150 350 325 150 375500450175
11: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 100 South 225 175 100 75 50
12: 300 West (John Stockton Dr) & 200 South 350 450 350 200 325 175 125 150 225 250 275 225
13: 300 West & 400 South (University Blvd)325 200 675 300 125 375 250 275 275 175 325 225
14: 300 West & 500 South 150 350 175 225 200 175 175 525
15: 300 West & 600 South 250 350 225 150 500 75 475 200
16: 200 West & North Temple 75 75 75 100 75 50 75 100 150 100 100
17: 200 West & South Temple 50 125 100 100 75 75 125 125
18: 200 West & 100 South 50 100 150 125 75
19: 200 South & 200 West 50 125 100 50 75 125 100 100 50 150 100
20: West Temple & North Temple 225 225 75 100 75 75 200 75 250 225
21: West Temple & South Temple 125 125 150 75 50 75 225 100 125
22: West Temple & 100 South 100 125 100 150 125 50
23: West Temple & 200 South 100 125 200 100 125 125 175 175 200 100 300 350
24: State Street & North Temple/2nd Avenue 350 425 375 275 50 350 75 150 375 175 225 225
25: State Street & 400 South (University Blvd)225 375 250 275 450 300 250 150 500 250 75 375
APPENDIX D
95th Percentile Queue Length Reports
D - 1
Business Confidential
Exhibit D
to
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
Interpretation and Definitions
As used in this Agreement, unless a clear contrary intention appears:
(a) any reference to the singular includes the plural and vice versa, any reference to natural
persons includes legal persons and vice versa, and any reference to a gender includes the other gender;
(b) the words “hereof”, “hereby”, “herein”, and “hereunder” and words of similar import, when
used in this Agreement, shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this
Agreement;
(c) any reference to Articles, Sections, and Exhibits are, unless otherwise stated, references to
Articles, Sections, and Exhibits of or to this Agreement, and references in any Section or definition to any
clause means such clause of such Section or definition;
(d) the headings in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be
taken into account in its interpretation;
(e) reference to any agreement (including this Agreement), document, or instrument means such
agreement, document, or instrument as amended, modified, superseded, replaced, or supplemented and in
effect from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and, if applicable, the terms of this Agreement;
(f) the Exhibits and Schedules hereto form an integral part of this Agreement and are equally
binding therewith, and any reference to “this Agreement” shall include such Exhibits and Schedules;
(g) references to a person shall include any permitted assignee or successor to such Party in
accordance with this Agreement and reference to a person in a particular capacity excludes such person in
any other capacity;
(h) all references herein to “Business Day” shall mean a day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or
legal holiday in the State of Utah. If any period is referred to in this Agreement by way of reference to a
number of days, the days shall be calculated exclusively of the first and inclusively of the last day unless the
last day falls on a day that is not a Business Day in which case the last day shall be the next succeeding
Business Day;
(i) the use of “or” is intended to be exclusive and lists alternatives while the use of “and” is
intended to be inclusive and each listed item is required;
(j) all references to the Mayor shall include any City employee or officer who has been
designated by the Mayor to take such action as may be referred to in this Agreement;
(k) the term “Eligible Expenses” means: (1) costs for Debt Service on Bonds for the construction
or remodel of Delta Center; (2) cost to prepare plans and specifications for the District Redevelopment
Project; (3) construction, demolition, modification and realignment in connection with the Arena Renovation;
(4) construction, demolition, modification or realignment of roads abutting the District Redevelopment
Project; (5) public art within the District Redevelopment project; and (6) law enforcement and public safety
infrastructure within the Project Area. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Eligible Expenses shall not include
any costs or expenses, including attorneys fees, associated with construction defects associated with the
District Redevelopment Project.
I-1
Exhibit E
To
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
District Redevelopment Conceptual Plan
I-2
Exhibit F
To
Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement
Form of Transfer Acknowledgement
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
Salt Lake City Corporation
Attn: City Attorney’s Office
451 S. State Street, Room [INSERT]
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5474
P.O. Box 145474
Tax Parcel Nos. (See Exhibit “B”)
(Space above for Recorder's use only.)
TRANSFER ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This Transfer Acknowledgment (the “Acknowledgment”) is made as of the day of ,
(the “Effective Date”), by and between Smith Entertainment Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (“Assignor”) and a (“Assignee”),
Assignor and Assignee are may alternatively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. Assignor is a party to that certain Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of May
, 2024 (the “Agreement”), by and between Assignor and Salt Lake City, a political subdivision of the State
of Utah, concerning certain real property located in Salt Lake County, Utah (the “SEG Property”), more
particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto.
B. In connection with Assignor’s sub lease of a portion of the SEG Property more particularly
described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto (the “Transfer Property”) to Assignee, Assignor desires to assign certain
of its rights and obligations under the Agreement pertaining specifically to the Transfer Property as more
particularly described in this Acknowledgment to Assignee, Assignee desires to accept such assignment.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual promises herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
Parties agree as follows:
1.Assignment and Assumption. Effective upon the Effective Date, Assignor hereby assigns to
Assignee [50% of]/[all of] its rights and obligations under Section[(s) of the Agreement pertaining
specifically to the Transfer Property only, specifically, Assignor’s right to (the “Assigned
Rights”), and Assignee hereby accepts such assignment and assumes and agrees to be bound by all of the terms
and conditions of the Agreement with respect to the Assigned Rights and the Transfer Property. For avoidance
I-3
of doubt, no rights are transferred to Assignee hereunder except those specifically set forth above, and Assignor
hereby reserves to itself all other rights, densities, and benefits of the Agreement and any other agreements or
benefits pertaining to the Transfer Property.2
2.Release. From and after the Effective Date, Assignor shall be released from all obligations
under the Agreement arising after the Effective Date with respect to the Assigned Rights and the Transfer Property.
3.Reservation. Assignor reserves all rights and obligations arising under the Agreement that are
not expressly included in the Assigned Rights.
4.Representations and Warranties of Assignor. Assignor represents and warrants to Assignee that
it has full power and authority (including full corporate power and authority) to assign the Assigned Rights to
Assignee pursuant to this Acknowledgment. These representations and warranties shall survive any cancellation of
this Acknowledgment.
5.Representations and Warranties of Assignee. Assignee represents and warrants to Assignor
that it has full power and authority (including full corporate power and authority) to assume the Assigned Rights
pursuant to this Acknowledgment. These representations and warranties shall survive any cancellation of this
Acknowledgment.
6.Indemnification. Assignee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Assignor harmless against any
claims arising under the Agreement and pertaining specifically to the Assigned Rights and the Transfer Property
from and after the Effective Date. Assignor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Assignor harmless against any
claims arising under the Agreement and pertaining specifically to the Assigned Rights and the Transfer Property
on and before the Effective Date.
7.Ratification and Survival. Other than those specific provisions amended by this
Acknowledgment, all other provisions, rights, and obligations contained in the Agreement are hereby ratified by
the Parties, and all of the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the Parties as set forth herein
shall survive the consummation of the transactions set forth herein. In the event of any conflict between the
Agreement and this Acknowledgment, this Acknowledgment shall govern. Any terms not defined herein shall
carry those definitions set forth in the Agreement.
[Signature Pages Follow]
2 Additional language regarding assumption of obligations (including, e.g., Home Game Covenant) to be added if
applicable.
I-4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Acknowledgment as of the date first above
written.
“Assignor”
Name:
Title:
“Assignee”
Name:
Title:
[Applicable Notary]
4876-2854-4177, v. 25
CapitalCityRevitalizationZone_UpdatedTransmit
tal
Final Audit Report 2024-07-05
"CapitalCityRevitalizationZone_UpdatedTransmittal" History
Document created by Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
2024-07-05 - 8:38:56 PM GMT
Document emailed to Katherine Lewis (katherine.lewis@slcgov.com) for signature
2024-07-05 - 8:41:47 PM GMT
Email viewed by Katherine Lewis (katherine.lewis@slcgov.com)
2024-07-05 - 8:42:38 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Katherine Lewis (katherine.lewis@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2024-07-05 - 8:42:54 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Document emailed to rachel otto (rachel.otto@slcgov.com) for signature
2024-07-05 - 8:43:00 PM GMT
Email viewed by rachel otto (rachel.otto@slcgov.com)
2024-07-05 - 8:44:29 PM GMT
Document e-signed by rachel otto (rachel.otto@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2024-07-05 - 8:44:39 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2024-07-05 - 8:44:39 PM GMT
Created:
By:
Status:
2024-07-05
Cindy Trishman (cindy.trishman@slcgov.com)
Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAGAJxw_qaLH79kwdbuaDjGNc-cbyGSZfa
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
1
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
DATE: July 2, 2024
TO: Council Chair Victoria Petro
Council Vice Chair Chris Wharton
Council Members
PREPARED BY: Katie Lewis, City Attorney
Rachel Otto, Mayor’s Chief of Staff
RE: Initial Discussion Regarding Major Terms in Capital City Revitalization Zone Participation Agreement
REQUESTED ACTION: Briefing July 2, 2024; follow up briefing on July 9, 2024; Consider approving
a resolution endorsing the Capital City Revitalization Zone Project Area and Participation Agreement on
July 9, 2024
POLICY ITEM: Capital City Revitalization Zone
BUDGET IMPACTS: This briefing is the first discussion of the proposed deal points of a Participation
Agreement between Salt Lake City (City) and Smith Entertainment Group (SEG).
- The potential next step will be a follow up briefing and vote by the Council to endorse the
Participation Agreement and Project Area on July 9, 2024.
- This is the first step towards the adoption of an additional .5% sales tax City-wide to be dedicated
to the renovation of Delta Center and construction of a sports, entertainment, culture, and
convention district.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For decades, residents of the City and the State of Utah have supported and
enjoyed the presence of professional sports downtown, and the teams are an integral part of the community.
During the 2024 general legislative session, the Utah legislature passed the Capital City Revitalization Zone
Act, Utah Code 63N-3-1301, et seq. (the Act), which authorizes the City to levy a .5% sales and use tax for
thirty years (Revitalization Tax) to be used for the benefit of revitalization projects within a designated
project area at and around Delta Center, which is the home arena to the existing NBA franchise and the new
NHL franchise.
Under the Act, the City may initiate the process to impose the Revitalization Tax upon receiving an
application from an entity that is a party to one or more professional sports franchise agreement(s) and that
will play their home games in an arena downtown. Upon receipt of an application, the City and applicant
may negotiate the terms of a proposed project area and participation agreement.
If the City endorses the proposed project area and participation agreement, the City will provide notice of
the endorsement to the state’s Revitalization Zone Committee, which committee has been established
pursuant to Utah Code 63N-3-1307.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
2
Upon receipt of the City’s endorsement, the Revitalization Zone Committee has 30 days to review the
proposed project area and participation agreement. If the Revitalization Zone Committee endorses the
project area and participation agreement, the Committee will send notice of the endorsement back to the
City for final approval and adoption of the Revitalization Tax and approval/execution of the participation
agreement.
SEG owns the Utah Jazz, the NBA franchise, and the Utah Hockey Club, the NHL franchise, whose home
games are both played at Delta Center.
On April 4, 2024, SEG applied to the City requesting the City impose Revitalization Tax to support a
proposed remodel of Delta Center and construction of a sports, entertainment, culture, and convention
district in downtown Salt Lake City.
Upon receipt of the application, SEG and the City are negotiating a proposed project area that meets the
requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1302 (Project Area) and a proposed participation agreement that meets
the requirements of Utah Code 63N-3-1305 (Participation Agreement).
SUMMARY OF TERMS: The Project Area and Participation Agreement are being finalized and will be
transmitted to the Council by July 5, 2024, at the latest. An overview of the terms is provided below.
Project: SEG will design, develop, construct and complete renovations to Delta Center to make it
a first-class arena for the NBA and NHL teams. In collaboration with Salt Lake County, SEG also
intends to develop portions of the two blocks east of Delta Center as a sports, entertainment, culture,
and convention district. The Delta Center remodel and the development of the sports,
entertainment, culture, and convention district is described here as the “District”.
o During the design and construction of the District, SEG will use commercially reasonable
efforts to use sustainable development elements into the improvements and SEG will
endeavor to incorporate its construction contract bidding process readily available to and
easily accessible to small-, minority-, veteran-, and/or woman-owned contractors and
subcontractors.
o The City will require design guidelines in a separate development agreement for the
construction of the District.
o By the tenth anniversary of the Participation Agreement, SEG will complete and make
operational all elements of the District which are funded by the Revitalization Sales Tax.
Maximum Dollar Amount: The maximum amount of net bond proceeds that SEG may receive is
$900,000,000. This will be paid from the Revitalization Tax collected by the City over thirty years,
which is anticipated to generate revenues of approximately $1.2 billion (present value) over the 30-
year life of the agreement.
o Of the $900,000,000, SEG currently estimates that it will spend $525,000,000 in costs for
the Delta Center remodel and $375,000,000 in costs for the other district improvements.
City Administrative Fee: The City will receive up to 1% of the Revitalization Tax over the thirty
year period to reimburse the City for its costs incurred to create and administer the Project Area as
an administrative fee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
3
Public benefits: In exchange for the commitment of public funding for the remodel of Delta Center
and construction of the sports, culture, convention, and entertainment district, SEG commits to the
following public benefits for Salt Lake City:
o Ticket fee: Starting on July 1, 2025, SEG will impose a fee on each ticket sold for events
at Delta Center. The amount of the ticket fee will be: a fee of $1 per ticket if the ticket
price is $25 or less; a fee of $2 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $25 but less
than $200; and a fee of $3 per ticket if the ticket price is greater than $200.
The ticket fee will be delivered to the City, to be deposited in a separate City-
managed account (Public Benefit Account), to be spent on family-sized and
affordable housing and other public benefit initiatives as determined by the City,
and other initiatives the City identifies.
o Community Support; Workforce Development: SEG will support community and
workforce development initiatives by establishing or providing:
Apprenticeship Programs: During construction, maintenance, and operation of the
District, SEG will encourage local community partners to train a diverse and
competent workforce to become apprentices in sport-related trades. SEG will
focus on individuals from communities in Salt Lake City from households that
qualify for free or reduced lunch or otherwise meet the Income Eligibility
Guidelines published by the Utah State Board of Education (Individuals from
Economically Disadvantaged Families). SEG will conduct at least three in-
person outreach events per year.
College internship programs: SEG will offer at least fifteen (15) paid internships
per year for college students (with a goal of twenty-five percent (25%) of such
students with demonstrated financial need), for careers in the sports business. The
internships must be primarily on-site and in-person within the NHL team, the NBA
team, or SEG.
High school shadowing programs: SEG will work with the NHL team and the
NBA team to offer a shadowing program for at least ten (10) local high school
students (with a goal of fifty percent (50%) of such students who are Individuals
from Economically Disadvantaged Families) which will provide them the
opportunity to shadow in person a staff member or department within the
professional sports team organization or SEG, or the operator of the Delta Center,
to learn about the business of a sports organization. The program will be housed
within the NBA team, the NHL team, or SEG.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
4
Annual lectures/Speaking engagements: SEG will collaborate with local Salt Lake
City high schools and middle schools for opportunities for members of the NHL
team (i.e. players, coaches or staff), the NBA team (i.e. players, coaches or staff)
or SEG personnel to speak to classes or student groups about the sports
industry. SEG will conduct at least four (4) of these in person outreach events per
year to such schools.
Youth programming: SEG will continue promoting the creation, development, and
growth of youth programming for both basketball and hockey in Salt Lake City,
SEG will invest $2,000,000 providing multi-faceted support to youth athletics in
Salt Lake City.
Free and subsidized tickets: SEG shall ensure that the NHL team and the NBA
team will each offer free or subsidized tickets to various home games each season
to Salt Lake City-based community organizations, with the goal of encouraging
Individuals from Economically Disadvantaged Families in Salt Lake City to attend
NHL and NBA home games.
o Gathering Spaces: As part of the development of the district, SEG will design
gathering/event/plaza spaces that will welcome members of the community to downtown
Salt Lake City. These spaces will include: (1) an outdoor event space; (2) walkways
connecting the public streets and rights of way to the district; and (3) landscape features
and other elements consistent with a place of gathering. These spaces are intended to be
operated and maintained such that they are inclusive and welcoming spaces for individuals
and families.
The Gathering Spaces will be owned, operated and managed by SEG. The rules
and regulations for the gathering spaces will include a statement affirming SEG’s
support of non-discriminatory behavior on the basis of race, creed, color, ethnicity,
national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression,
age, or physical or mental ability.
SEG and the City will identify, on an annual basis, two mutually acceptable periods
of three days each, between May 1 and September 15, that the City or a community
organization designated by the City and approved by SEG can use one or more of
the gathering spaces free of cost for festivals and events.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
5
o Japantown: As part of the development of the District, SEG will coordinate with the City
on its efforts to facilitate the recognition, revitalization, and/or redevelopment of the
Japantown community, located at 100 South and 300 West. SEG will meet, at a minimum,
twice a year for the first 36 months with members designated by the Japanese Church of
Christ and the Buddhist Temple, about SEG’s progress and planning efforts and to receive
input from the Japantown representatives about the development of the revitalization and
redevelopment of Japantown. Additionally, SEG will seek to incorporate the following into
the District development:
Activate the north side of 100 South in Japantown, including consideration of street
facing activated spaces and minimizing the number of truck loading and unloading
areas along 100 S and facing Japantown.
Create a pedestrian connection between the interior of the District and Japantown
including a spatial buffer between the District development and the Japanese
Church of Christ.
Use commercially reasonable efforts to incorporate Japanese architectural or
landscaping elements in the 100 South ground level facades facing Japantown.
Work with the Japanese American community to develop historical markers that
relate to Japantown’s history, with content approved by the local Japanese
American community. SEG will approve content and location of any historical
markers on SEG owned and controlled property. All historic markers will be
installed and fabricated by SEG using funds from the Public Benefits Account.
The City agrees to spend not less than $5,000,000 from the Public Benefits
Account for the revitalization and redevelopment of Japantown.
o Public Safety: SEG will provide a space within the District for use by security personnel
and Salt Lake City Police Department officers, including for the processing and holding of
arrestees.
o Public Art: The City will spend a minimum of $5,000,000 from the Public Benefits
Account towards the design, fabrication, installation, and maintenance of various pieces of
public art, including iconic art, in the District. The public art will be procured through a
mutually agreed upon process between the City’s Arts Council and SEG. The procurement
process will include a process for notifying and engaging with local artists to compete for
the opportunity to create public art.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
6
Transparency and Reporting:
o SEG will appoint a liaison to the City to be the point person to report on SEG’s use of the
Revitalization Sales Tax, progress on the construction of the District, and implementation
of the Public Benefits.
o SEG (or its liaison), will attend at least one City Council meeting per year to provide a
briefing and update on the District.
o SEG’s liaison will also provide reports summarizing the projects being constructed, an
accounting of the Revitalization Sales Tax received, a summary of the ticket fee, and the
status on the construction schedule of the District.
o SEG will provide an annual report to the City on the status of construction and design of
the Gathering Spaces, the status of the workforce development and community support
initiatives, and the number of public outreach events conducted by SEG for the community
support initiatives.
Non-relocation provision: Should the agreement with the County be reached regarding the County
Lease as noted below and other conditions be met, both the NBA and NHL will play their home
games at Delta Center during the term of the Participation Agreement. If either team ceases to play
its home games at Delta Center, the City has a variety of remedies, including specific performance
or payment of damages.
County Lease: SEG agrees that they will negotiate and endeavor to execute a lease with the
County for County-owned property necessary for the District development on or before July 1,
2025. Execution of the lease with the County is a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the
Agreement.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
7
NEXT STEPS: The City Council may schedule another discussion and potential action on the Participation
Agreement and Project Area on July 9, 2024. If the City Council takes action to endorse the Project Area
and Participation Agreement, the Act lays out the following next steps:
1. City staff will take all necessary steps to provide notice to the Revitalization Zone Committee of
the City Council’s endorsement of the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
2. Within 30 days of the Revitalization Zone Committee’s receipt of the City’s notice, they will review
the Project Area and Participation Agreement and, in a public meeting, vote to either approve or
reject the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
a. If the Revitalization Zone Committee rejects the Project Area or Participation Agreement,
they will adopt findings explaining the rejection, and the City and SEG will have an
opportunity to further negotiate or amend the Project Area and Participation Agreement.
b. If the Revitalization Zone Committee approves the Project Area and Participation
Agreement, they will provide notice to the City Council of such approval.
3. Once the Revitalization Zone Committee approves the Project Area and Participation Agreement,
the City Council may, in a public meeting, give final approval to the Project Area and Participation
Agreement.
4. After giving final approval, the City Council may vote in a public meeting to impose the
Revitalization Sales Tax.
Salt Lake City Council
June 11, 2024
UTAH JAZZ 1REIMAGINING
DOWNTOWN
SLC
DELTA
CENTER
SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT CULTURE/CONVENTION
CONVENTION
CENTER
ABRAVANEL
HALL
UMOCA
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
JAPANTOWN STREET
GUIDING
PRINCIPLES
•Walkability
•Safety
•Sustainability
•Economic Development
•Suitable Parking
•Restoring Connectivity & Flow
•Cohesive Transportation Planning
•Community Partnership
•Arts, Cultural, & Community
Gathering Spaces
TEARING
DOWN WALLS,
NOT BUILDING
NEW ONES
Restoring connectivity and flow connecting the east and west sides
of downtown while ensuring no new walls are inadvertently built.
Nihon Matsuri / Japantown Handout
Front of Handout:
Revitalization of Japantown
What Does S.B. 272 Do?
• Allows the City to designate up to 100 acres as a “Capital City Revitalization Zone” after a
qualified applicant (Smith Entertainment Group - SEG) submits an application and the
Council and Revitalization Committee approves a participation agreement.
• The zone is required to be around a “currently existing qualified stadium.” (In this case,
the Delta Center).
• Allows the City to enact a 0.5% sales tax increase City-wide, with the requirement that all
funds generated by that tax be spent inside the zone for a period of 30 years.
• Allows a qualified applicant to use these funds within that area to reconstruct a stadium,
service debt on bonds for a stadium, infrastructure, and/or “associated uses including
entertainment and recreational uses…”
• Creates a “Capital City Revitalization Zone Committee” made up of state leaders that will
receive regular reports from the City and applicant on the plan, including how funds are
spent.
Note: SB 272 creates an entirely new process and City Attorneys are still working with
State Attorneys and the private sector to refine a shared understanding of the required
information and steps.
Questions? Reach out to City.Council.Liaisons@slcgov.com.
Sign up for email updates about Japantown at tinyURL.com/JapantownUpdates.
Back of Handout:
What is the City’s Role in this Process?
City Council: Consider adopting a participation agreement
• After a qualified applicant (SEG) submits an application to the City, the City’s
Administration negotiates a "participation agreement" based on that application.
• SB 272 has a deadline of September 1 for this step, although it may be
sooner.
City Council: Consider approving a sales tax increase
• As a part of the plan above, the participation agreement may identify the tool of
increased sales tax revenue to fund the proposed project.
• SB 272 has a deadline of December 31 for this step, although it may be
sooner, and may be tied to the adoption of the participation agreement. City
Attorneys are still working through this.
Planning Commission and City Council: Rezoning to facilitate development
Nihon Matsuri / Japantown Handout
• The City is required to process any zoning adjustments to accommodate the
development by September 1.
Questions? Reach out to City.Council.Liaisons@slcgov.com.
Sign up for email updates about Japantown at tinyURL.com/JapantownUpdates.
Item I5
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Allison Rowland
Budget and Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO GOAT HEAD, LLC,
AT 702 SOUTH 300 EAST
MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE
I move that the Council adopt the ordinance approving a $100,000 loan for Goat Head, LLC,
from the Economic Development Loan Fund.
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance, and proceed to the next agenda item.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Allison Rowland
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO GOAT HEAD, LLC,
AT 702 SOUTH 300 EAST
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will consider approving a loan from the City’s Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) to a
business called Goat Head, LLC, at 702 South 300 East, for a restaurant serving vegan and vegetarian food. The
City’s Economic Development Loan Committee recommends the Council approve a $100,000 loan at a 10.5%
fixed interest rate over seven years. This start-up loan will assist in the creation of four new jobs in the next year,
and retention of two existing jobs. Funds will also help pay for kitchen and service equipment, buildout of new
leased space, licenses, working capital and wages.
The relatively high interest rate reflects the 8.5% prime rate at the time of the application plus the standard
EDLF four percentage points, though the project did qualify for a 2 percentage point reduction based on
sustainability and being owned by a socially and economically disadvantaged individual (see section B below).
Council staff reminder: EDLF loans will now be scheduled for a vote on the same day as the briefing, so this is
scheduled for action on the July 9 agenda.
Goal of the briefing: Consider a potential $100,000 loan from the Economic Development Loan Fund to a
business called Goat Head, LLC.
ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.Interest Rates. For context, the nationwide median small business commercial and industrial loan rates
for the first quarter of 2024 (the most recent data available), were 7.85% for fixed-rate loans at urban banks,
and 8.79% for variable rate loans, according to the most recent U.S. Federal Reserve Small Business
Item Schedule:
Briefing: July 9, 2024
Public Hearing: N/A
Potential Action: July 9, 2024
Page | 2
Lending Survey.i In the second quarter of 2022, these rates were 4.50% and 5.55% respectively. Interest
rates for EDLF loans consider an assessment of the risk level of different applicants, among other factors,
and include potential interest rate reductions. Interest rates have ranged from 7.25% for nearly all 2022
EDLF loans to an average of 9.69% in 2023 and 2024.
B.Interest Rate Reductions. The bases for potential reductions are as follows:
1.Location within a priority area: RDA Project Area; Opportunity Zone; West of I-15; or
Neighborhood Business Improvement Program (NBIP, previously known as Façade Improvement)
target area.
2.Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individuals (SEDI)-Owned Businesses: 51%
of the business is owned by at least one SEDI individual.
3.Low Income Business Owner: Income does not exceed 80% of Salt Lake County average
median income (AMI) as defined by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
4.Sustainability: Either,
a. Membership in SLC Green’s E2 Business Program; or
b. Loan proceeds will be used for the purchase of electric vehicles, electric vehicle
charging stations and infrastructure, renewable energy including but not limited to
wind and solar, heat pumps, high efficiency equipment, and/or energy efficiency.
C.Goals: The application from Goat Head, LLC, meets the following EDLF program goals:
•Increases employment opportunities;
•Stimulates business development and expansion;
•Promote economic development;
•Enhances neighborhood vitality; and,
•Boosts commercial enterprise.
D.Program. The EDLF is a program administered by the Department of Economic Development, which is
charged with maintaining the corpus of the EDLF in a manner sufficient to perpetuate the goals of the
program. Each loan application is pre-screened, and an underwriting analysis and economic impact
statement are completed before an application may be recommended for Loan Committee (see below)
review. Information on successful applications is transmitted to the Council to consider for final approval.
E.Available balance and amount of outstanding loans. The Department reported that the Fund’s
available balance was $8,800,000 in June 14, 2024. Outstanding loans totaled $3,221,925 as of the same
date.
F.EDLF Committee Membership. The Department of Economic Development lists nine members of the
EDLF Committee as follows:
City Employees Community Volunteers
1. Finance Director, Community and
Neighborhoods Department
2. Salt Lake City Business Advisory Board (BAB)
member
3. Representative of the Mayor’s Office 4. Banker
5. Salt Lake City employee at large 6. Community lender
Page | 3
7. Representative of the Division of Housing
Stability
8. Business mentor
9. Director, Department of Economic
Development
10.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The Council may wish to have a policy discussion with the Administration about interest rates charged by
the City from this and other loan funds, and whether it makes sense to re-evaluate how interest rates are
determined for lenders, especially since the City typically offers loans as a lender-of-last-resort.
2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the EDLF Committee considered any other unique
information about this business that would help Council Members with their own evaluations of how this
application compares to others. For example, are there risk factors that are evaluated for each company, like
outstanding loans, years in business, etc.?
3.What outreach does the Department do to ensure a diverse pool of businesses successfully applies to the
EDLF? Are applications from diverse owners, particularly those whose businesses are located on the
Westside, offered additional support through the application process? Does EDLF staff have ideas for
improving access that would benefit from program changes or additional funding?
4. The Council may wish to request a more general update on EDLF use and processes. This could include the
number of applications, review criteria used, loan program goals, etc.
i Source: Small Business Lending Survey, New Small Business Lending Declines as Credit Standards Continue
to Tighten. Consulted on July 1, 2024, at https://www.kansascityfed.org/surveys/small-business-lending-
survey/new-small-business-lending-declines-as-credit-standards-continue-to-tighten/.
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
1 8*4 1
To: Start Date: Date Sent to Council:
Salt Lake City Council Chair 07/03/2024 07/08/2024
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Chair
From:
Employee Name:E-mail
Fantle,Brian Brian.Pantle@slcgov.com
Department
Economic Development
Department Director Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signature*
Director Signed Date Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
07/03/2024 07/08/2024
Subject:
EDLF Loan Goat Head,LLC-updated
Additional Staff Contact: Presenters/Staff Table
Brian Fantle,Brian.Pantle@slcgov.com Brian Fantle,Brian.Pantle@slcgov.com
Roberta Reichgelt,Roberta.Reichgelt@slcgov.com Roberta Reichgelt,Roberta.Reichgelt@slcgov.com
Document Type*Budget Impact* Budget Impact:
Resolution Yes
No
Recommendation:
Approve
Background/Discussion (?)
On May 23rd,2024,a loan request from Goat Head,LLC was presented to the EDLF Loan Committee for review and discussion.GoatHead,LLC is a
restaurant serving vegan,vegetarian food.
Will the City Council need to hold a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
Applicants of The Economic Development Loan Fund(EDLF)go through a thorough application process consisting of a pre-screening,
underwriting analysis,and economic impact statement.Only after the loan applicant goes through these processes,then the loan is
recommended to be reviewed by the Loan Committee members.Upon the thorough review of the Loan Committee members then a
recommendation is made before the loan is transmitted to the Mayor for Council to receive the recommendation for final approval.Because the
i.. 1L----- nn,...a:- -
Chief Administrator Officer's Comments
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
Ordinance approving a $100,000 loan for Goat Head LLC, at 702 S 300 E from the Economic
Development Loan Fund)
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation's ("City") Economic Development Loan Fund
EDLF) is a program to stimulate local business development, encourage private investment,
enhance neighborhood vitality, and boost commercial enterprise in Salt Lake City.
WHEREAS, the EDLF is administered by the Department of Economic Development
DED") and loan applications are first prescreened by DED staff, and then reviewed by the
EDLF Loan Committee.
WHEREAS, the EDLF Loan Committee and DED staff recommend the approval of the
attached loan term sheet for a $100,000 loan to Goat Head LLC, a local business located at 702
South 300 East.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, that:
SECTION 1. Loan Approval. The City Council approves the loan outlined in the Term
Sheet attached hereto, subject to revisions that do not materially affect the rights and obligations
of the City hereunder. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to negotiate and execute the loan
agreement and any other relevant documents consistent with the Term Sheet, and incorporating
such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney's office.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first
publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah, this day of
52024.
Victoria Petro, Council Chair
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
Date: June 18, 2024
57
Sara Montoya, Ci Attorney
LOAN TERM SHEET
Applicant: Goat Head, LLC
Address: 702 South 300 East
Proposed Loan Terms
Loan Amount: $100,000
Loan Terms: 7 Years
Interest Rate Calculation Prime Interest Rate: 8.5%at the time of application on 11/13/2023
Plus, EDLF Charge: 4%
Less Discount: 1%for each
SEDI
Sustainability
Final Interest Rate: 10.5%
Use of Funds: Kitchen and service equipment, buildout of new leased space, licenses working capital and
owner's wages.
Business Type: Start-up
Collateral:Two vehicles and Equipment
Personal Guarantees: Sarah Boone-Witham
Michael Boone-Witham
Conditions for Closing
Complete enrollment in Sustainability's E2 program
Obtain all City approvals, execute all loan documents as deemed necessary by City legal counsel
and DED staff, such other terms as recommended by City legal counsel and DED staff.
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
1 8*4 1
To: Start Date: Date Sent to Council:
Salt Lake City Council Chair 06/25/2024 06/26/2024
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Chair
From:
Employee Name:E-mail
Brian Pantle Brian.Pantle@slcgov.com
Department
Economic Development
Department Director Signature Chief AdministratorOfficer's Signature*
0''jP,if,RibQ0-c7P,i &w ae%w_
Director Signed Date Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
06/26/2024 06/26/2024
Subject:
EDLF Transmittal for Goat Head,LLC
Additional Staff Contact: Presenters/Staff Table
Roberta Reichgelt-Roberta.Reichgelt@slcgov.com Brian Pantle-Brian.pantle@slcgov.com
Jolynn Walz-jolynn.walz@slcgov.com Roberta Reichgelt-roberta.reichgelt@slcgov.com
Document Type*Budget Impact* Budget Impact:
Ordinance Yes
No
Recommendation:
The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of$100,000.00 loan to Goat Head,LLC.
Background/Discussion(?)
On May 23,2024,a loan request for Goat Head,LLC was presented to the Economic Development Loan Fund(EDLF)Loan Committee for review
and discussion.Goat Head,LLC is a restaurant serving vegan,vegetarian food.
Will the City Council need to hold a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
Chief Administrator Officer's Comments
ERIN MENDENHALL cn LORENA RIFFO-JENSON
MAYOR DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 06/24/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Lorena Riffo-Jenson, Director, Department of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund(EDLF) — (Goat Head, LLC)
STAFF CONTACTS:
Roberta Reichgelt, Business Development Director, Roberta.reichgelt(-slcgov.com
Project Manager, Brian Pantle, Brian.Pantle(&slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Loan Approval
RECOMMENDATION: The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of$100,000
loan to Goat Head LLC.
BUDGET IMPACT: $100,00o from the Economic Development Loan Fund
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On May 23rd, 2024, a loan request from Goat Head, LLC was
presented to the EDLF Loan Committee for review and discussion. Goat Head,LLC is a restaurant
serving vegan,vegetarian food.
Basic Loan request
Business Name: Goat Head, LLC
Address: 702 South Soo East
Loan Amount Requested: $100,000
Loan Term: 7 Years
Interest Rate: 10.5%
Use of Funds: Kitchen and service equipment,buildout of new leased space,licenses working
capital and owner's wages.
Loan Type: Start-up
Council District: D4
Reasoning behind staff recommendation
Applicants of The Economic Development Loan Fund(EDLF)go through a thorough application
process consisting of a pre-screening,underwriting analysis, and economic impact
statement. Only after the loan applicant goes through these processes,then the loan is
recommended to be reviewed by the Loan Committee members. Upon the thorough review of the
Loan Committee members then a recommendation is made before the loan is transmitted to the
Mayor for Council to receive the recommendation for final approval. Because the Loan
Committee review process must adhere to the Open Meetings Act, DED's staff has worked closely
with the City Attorney's Office to ensure that applicants'information is protected and at the same
time the public process is followed.
In addition,the EDLF loans must meet the following goals of the Economic Development Loan
Fund as stated in the EDLF program guidelines.This loan meets the EDLF program guidelines in
the following areas.
Increase employment opportunities,
Stimulate business development and expansion,
Promote economic development,
Enhance neighborhood vitality,
Boost commercial enterprise.
This loan will assist in the creation of 4 new jobs in the next year and retention of 2 current jobs.
This loan was recommended by the EDLF Committee to the City Council for approval.
EDLF Loan Balances
1. As reported from The Finance Department on o6/14/2024,the EDLF available
fund balance is: $8,800,000.00.
2. As of o6/14/2024 the amount of outstanding loans total is: $3,221,925.22
EDLF Loan Committee
There is a total of nine (9) EDLF Committee members.
City Employees:
1. Community and Neighborhoods Finance
2. Mayor's Office
3. Employee at large
4. Housing Stability
5. Economic Development
Community Volunteers:
6. Business Advisory Board(BAB) member
7. Banker
8. Community lender
9. Business mentor
Attachments: Terms Sheet and Ordinance
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2024
Ordinance approving a $100,000 loan for Goat Head LLC, at 702 S 300 E from the Economic
Development Loan Fund)
WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation's ("City") Economic Development Loan Fund
EDLF) is a program to stimulate local business development, encourage private investment,
enhance neighborhood vitality, and boost commercial enterprise in Salt Lake City.
WHEREAS, the EDLF is administered by the Department of Economic Development
DED") and loan applications are first prescreened by DED staff, and then reviewed by the
EDLF Loan Committee.
WHEREAS, the EDLF Loan Committee and DED staff recommend the approval of the
attached loan term sheet for a $100,00 loan to Goat Head LLC, a local business located at 702
South 300 East.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, that:
SECTION 1. Loan Approval. The City Council approves the loan outlined in the Term
Sheet attached hereto, subject to revisions that do not materially affect the rights and obligations
of the City hereunder. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to negotiate and execute the loan
agreement and any other relevant documents consistent with the Term Sheet, and incorporating
such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney's office.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first
publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of
12024.
Victoria Petro, Council Chair
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CITY RECORDER
SEAL)
Bill No. of 2024.
Published:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
Date: June 18, 2024
57
Sara Montoya, Ci Attorney
LOAN TERM SHEET
Applicant: Goat Head, LLC
Address: 702 South 300 East
Proposed Loan Terms
Loan Amount: $100,000
Loan Terms: 7 Years
Interest Rate Calculation Prime Interest Rate: 8.5%at the time of application on 11/13/2023
Plus, EDLF Charge: 4%
Less Discount: 1%for each
SEDI
Sustainability
Final Interest Rate: 10.5%
Use of Funds: Kitchen and service equipment, buildout of new leased space, licenses working capital and
owner's wages.
Business Type: Start-up
Collateral:Two vehicles and Equipment
Personal Guarantees: Sarah Boone-Witham
Michael Boone-Witham
Conditions for Closing
Complete enrollment in Sustainability's E2 program
Obtain all City approvals, execute all loan documents as deemed necessary by City legal counsel
and DED staff, such other terms as recommended by City legal counsel and DED staff.
This page has intentionally been left blank
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 6/27/2024
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 6/27/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 6/27/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and
Use Committee
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
april.patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Board Appointment Recommendation: City and
County Building Conservation and Use Committee
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Caitlyn Barhorst as a member of
the Board Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and Use
Committee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
June 27, 2024
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Dear Council Member Petro,
Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Board
Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee.
Caitlyn Barhorst to be appointed for a four year term starting from date of City Council advice
and consent and ending on Monday, July 17, 2028.
I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________ Date Received: 6/27/2024
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Sent to Council: 6/27/2024
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 6/27/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and
Use Committee
STAFF CONTACT: April Patterson
april.patterson@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Board Appointment: Board Appointment Recommendation: City and
County Building Conservation and Use Committee
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and appoint Mark Morris as a member of the
Board Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
June 27, 2024
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, UT 84114
Dear Council Member Petro,
Listed below is my recommendation for the membership appointment for the Board
Appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee.
Mark Morris to be appointed for a four year term starting from date of City Council advice
and consent and ending on Monday, July 17, 2028.
I respectfully ask for your consideration and support for this appointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
_________________
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Jill Love
Jill Love (Jun 14, 2024 15:04 MDT)Date Received:06/14/2024
Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 06/14/2024
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: 06/10/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
_
SUBJECT:Petition PLNPCM2024-00226: Prohibiting Distribution Centers on the Former North
Temple Landfill Site
STAFF CONTACT: Andy Hulka, Inland Port Principal Planner
801-535-6608 or andy.hulka@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve the petition for a zoning text amendment.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated a zoning text amendment to prohibit distribution centers
on the former North Temple Landfill site, located within the Northwest Quadrant Overlay. The
intent of the proposal is to avoid the concentration of a single land use and to allow for diverse
uses as outlined in the Northwest Quadrant Master Plan.
The North Temple Landfill site is a 765-acre parcel located at approximately 6780 W North
Temple St. The text amendment proposes two notable changes to the ordinance: (1) Adding a
new definition for “Distribution Center,” and (2) prohibiting distribution-related uses on the
North Temple Landfill site. The land uses to be prohibited on the site are distribution center,
package delivery facility, truck freight terminal, warehouse, and wholesale distribution.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
1001640
2024-06-10 17:55:39
--------------------------------------------
06
This petition coincides with a new law passed by the State legislature during the most recent
legislative session. SB0264 Inland Port Authority Amendments (2024) created a definition for
distribution centers and added language that “contaminated land may not be used for a distribution
center” within the Inland Port jurisdictional area. While the City is not necessarily required to
adopt the same standards as the State, this text amendment proposes similar language in an effort
to help implement City goals.
The Northwest Quadrant Master Plan includes a detailed vision of the 7200 West interchange as a
major gateway to the city with taller buildings, office & lodging land uses, and higher wage jobs.
Due to current trends, a majority of the developed properties in the Northwest Quadrant are
currently devoted to warehousing and distribution-related uses. While these facilities are important
to the economy, issues related to noise, air quality, traffic, and low-wage jobs in warehousing
districts are a potential concern. This text amendment is intended to help ensure the City’s vision
for the area is realized through the development of a variety of other permitted uses.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request on May 8th, 2024, and
voted unanimously to send a positive recommendation to the City Council.
PUBLIC PROCESS:
•Early Notification – On March 19, 2024, all community councils were sent the 45-day required
notice for recognized community organizations. Staff presented an overview of the project to
the Wasatch Hollow Community Council on March 27, 2024. None of the councils provided
comments on the request. A notice of the proposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants
within 300 feet of the property. An online open house was posted on the Planning Division’s
website from March to May.
•Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission on May
8th, 2024. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation
to the City Council regarding the proposed zoning map amendment. The full public meeting
can be viewed using this link starting at minute 1:53:30.
Planning Commission (PC) Records
a)PC Agenda of May 8th, 2024
b)PC Minutes of May 8th, 2024
c)Planning Commission Staff Report of
May 8th, 2024
EXHIBITS:
1. Ordinance
2. Project Chronology
3. Notice of the City Council Hearing
4. Mailing List
1. ORDINANCE
_______________________
therine D. Pasker, Senior Ci
Project Title: Prohibiting Distribution Centers on the
Former North Temple Landfill Site
Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-00226
Version: 1
Date Prepared: June 4, 2024
Planning Commission Action: Recommended 5/8/2024
This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments:
•Adds a new definition of “Distribution Center” for facilities that distribute products
directly to consumers, and adds language clarifying that the terms “Distribution Center”
and “Wholesale Distribution” do not include accessory distribution uses subordinate to a
different permitted land use.
•Adds “Distribution Center” as a permitted land use in the M-1, M-2, and BP Zoning
Districts.
•Adds a new footnote to the manufacturing districts land use table prohibiting distribution
centers, package delivery facilities, truck freight terminals, warehouses, and wholesale
distribution uses on the former North Temple Landfill site.
•Amends the off-street parking table by adding “Distribution Center” to the Storage and
Warehousing section.
Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. If modifications are
made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation, those will be added and highlighted
in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change.
1 1.Amends Section 21A.33.040 by adding “Distribution center” to the land use table, adding a
2 new footnote 21, and applying the new footnote 21 to several existing uses in the table, with
3 no other changes to the table or notes thereto, as follows:
4 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR
5 MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS:
Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse
M-1 M-2
Distribution center P19, 21 P19
Package delivery facility P21 P
Truck freight terminal P12, 21 P12
Warehouse P19, 21 P19
Wholesale distribution P19, 21 P19
6 Qualifying provisions:
7 …
1
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Date: June 4, 2024
By:
Ka ty Attorney
8 21. Prohibited on the North Temple Landfill site, as identified in the Northwest Quadrant
9 Master Plan.
10
11
12 2. Amends Section 21A.33.070 by adding “Distribution center” to the land use table, with no
13 other changes to the table, as follows:
2
14 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS:
Permitted And Conditional Uses By DistrictUse
RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A PL PL-2 I UI MH EI MU
Distribution center P24
15
16 3. Amends Table 21A.44.040-A by adding “Distribution center” under “INDUSTRIAL USES” category and subcategory “Storage
17 and Warehousing” with no other revisions to the table, as follows:
18
DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet
Minimum Parking Requirement
General Context Neighborhood
Center Context
Urban Center
Context
Transit Context
Land Use
All zoning districts
not listed in
another context
area
RB, SNB, CB, CN,
R-MU-35, R-MU -
45, SR-3, FB-UN1,
FB-SE, SSSC
Overlay
D-2, MU, TSA-T,
CSHBD1, CSHBD2
D-1, D-3, D-4, G-
MU, TSA-C, UI,
FB-UN2, FB-UN3,
FB-SC, R-MU
Maximum Parking
Allowed
INDUSTRIAL USES
Storage and Warehousing
Air cargo terminals
and package delivery
facility
Building materials
distribution
No Minimum No Maximum
Distribution center
Flammable liquids or
gases, heating fuel
distribution and
storage
No Minimum No Minimum No Maximum
3
Package delivery
facility
Warehouse
Warehouse, accessory
to retail and wholesale
business (maximum
5,000 square foot floor
plate)
Wholesale distribution
Storage, self 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area, plus
1 space per 30 storage units
2 spaces per 1,000
sq. ft. of office
All Contexts: 1 space
for every 15 storage
units
Contractor's
yard/office
2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office area All Contexts: 3
spaces per 1,000 sq.
ft. of office area
Rock, sand and gravel
storage and
distribution
Storage (outdoor)
Storage and display
(outdoor)
Storage, public
(outdoor)
No Minimum No Maximum
19
4
20 4. Amends Section 21A.62.040 as follows:
21 a. Adds a new definition “Distribution Center” in alphabetical order within the list:
22
23 DISTRIBUTION CENTER: A facility that is used for the receipt of products and the
24 storage, separation, and distribution of those products on an individual basis to individual
25 end-user consumers. This includes e-commerce activities. A distribution center is not a
26 retail goods establishment. The term “distribution center” does not include accessory
27 distribution that is subordinate and incidental to a primary land use (e.g., manufacturing,
28 industrial assembly, or other type of primary commercial or industrial use).
29
30 b. Amends the definition “Wholesale Distribution”:
31 WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION: A business that maintains an inventory of materials,
32 supplies and goods related to one or more industries and sells bulk quantities of materials,
33 supplies and goods from its inventory to companies within the industry. A wholesale
34 distributor is not a retail goods establishment. The term “wholesale distribution” does not
35 include accessory distribution that is subordinate and incidental to a primary land use
36 (e.g., manufacturing, industrial assembly, or other type of primary commercial or
37 industrial use).
5
2. PROJECT
CHRONOLOGY
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS
Blake Thomas
Director
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
Petition: PLNPCM2024-00226
February 27, 2024 Petition for the zoning text amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning
Division and assigned to Andy Hulka, Inland Port Principal Planner.
March 19, 2024 Information about the proposal was sent to all community councils in order to
solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and
comment period.
March 19, 2024 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all tenants and
property owners within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the
proposal and how to give public input on the project.
March – May 2024 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal.
April 19, 2024 Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve
for the Planning Commission meeting on May 8, 2024. Public hearing notice
mailed.
May 8, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 8, 2024. By a unanimous
vote of 8-0, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the
City Council for the proposed zoning text amendment.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
3. NOTICE OF CITY
COUNCIL HEARING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-00226 – Prohibiting
Distribution Centers on the Former North Temple Landfill Site – Mayor Erin Mendenhall has
initiated a zoning text amendment to prohibit distribution centers on the former North Temple
Landfill site, located within the Northwest Quadrant Overlay. The intent of the proposal is to avoid
the concentration of a single land use and to allow for diverse uses as outlined in the Northwest
Quadrant Master Plan. The North Temple Landfill site is a 765-acre parcel located at approximately
6780 W North Temple St. The subject property is within Council District 1, represented by Victoria
Petro.
As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments
regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning
this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance
the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held:
DATE:
PLACE: Electronic and in-person options.
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah
** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in-person
opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at
451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including
WebEx connection information, please visit https://www.slc.gov/council/agendas/. Comments
may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an
email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared
with the Council and added to the public record.
If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Andy
Hulka at 801-535-6608 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or
via e-mail at andy.hulka@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://aca-
prod.accela.com/SLCREF/Default.aspx, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition
number PLNPCM2023-00923.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include
alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least
two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711.
4. MAILING LIST
OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP
USCIF GLOBAL LOGISTICS CENTER LLC 4675 N MACARTHUR CT NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
SLC PORT PHASE 1, LLC 6028 W 700 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116
MPLD HUSKY LLC 9830 COLONNADE BLVD SAN ANTONIO TX 78230
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST PORTLAND OR 97232
GREAT BASIN VENTURES LLC 2449 S 6755 W WEST VALLEY UT 84128
SLC PORT PHASE 1A, LLC 6628 W 700 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116
PHASE 1A GLC 5, LLC 6628 W 700 N # 501 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116
KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER LLC 4700 W DAYBREAK PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009
SLC PORT PHASE 2 LLC 166 E 14000 S DRAPER UT 84020
EASTON PROPERTIES V LLC 5990 SEPULVEDA BLVD VAN NUYS CA 91411
PETERSON ACQUISITIONS LLC 225 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
NP-OV BSS VENTURES- CHICAGO, LLC; NP-OV BSS VENTURES-PHILADELPHIA 3315 N OAK TRFY KANSAS CITY MO 64116
SCHOOL AND INSTITUTIONAL TRUST LANDS ADMINISTRATION 102 S 200 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
SUBURBAN LAND RESERVE INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151
ZIONS SECURITIES CORPORATION PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151
WESTCORE ALPHA I-80 III, LLC 4350 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR SAN DIEGO CA 92122
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114
Current Occupant 777 N 5600 W Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6934 W 700 N #C Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6904 W 700 N #B Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6338 W 700 N Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6209 W 700 N #D Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6942 W 700 N Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 851 N 6880 W Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 575 N JOHN GLENN RD Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 491 N JOHN GLENN RD Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 421 N JOHN GLENN RD Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6780 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 355 N JOHN GLENN RD Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6220 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84116
Current Occupant 6060 W NORTH TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City UT 84116
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
184
To: Start Date: Date Sent to Council:
Salt Lake City Council Chair 06/03/2024 06/06/2024
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Chair
From:
Employee Name:E-mail
Walkingshaw,Nole Nole.Walkingshaw@slc.gov
Department
Information Management Services
Department Director Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signature*
Director Signed Date Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
06/04/2024 06/06/2024
Subject:
SLC Computers for the Community Program(formally known as the Digital Equipment Donation Program).
Additional Staff Contact: Presenters/Staff Table
Hailey Leek Hailey Leek
hailey.leek@slc.gov
Document Type*Budget Impact* Budget Impact:
Resolution Yes
No
Recommendation:
A.) The Administration recommends that a public hearing be held on the matter of the Public Benefits Analysis and that the Council consider
adopting a resolution approving the donation of up to 500 surplus computers the City no longer intends to use to local nonprofits for distribution
to community members in need.
B.) IMS proposes a change to improve the SLC Computers for the Community Program,aiming for more consistent and timely service to
community members.The current Public Benefit Analysis process requires multiple Administrative functions such as preparing the cost analysis,
drafting a transmittal,and preparing a resolution.These steps hinder our ability to develop a regular donation schedule.Recognizing the pressing
need for computers and growing interest from new partners,IMS suggests transitioning to quarterly donation cycles to qualified nonprofits.This
shift aligns with Utah Code 10-8-2,enabling donations to nonprofits without conducting a public benefits analysis.While this means City
programs like Youth and Family Services may not directly provide computers,they endorse the change and are willing to refer families to
nonprofits that are awarded devices.
Under the proposed system,near the beginning of the fiscal year IMS would identify the number of devices and related peripheral accessories
that will be donated to nonprofits organizations and will seek Council approval to proceed with such donations using an incremental approach
that contemplates distributing a number of the identified devices to the identified nonprofit organizations. Such nonprofit organizations will be
selected through open applications for those nonprofits serving Salt Lake City residents.Allocations of the identified devices to the selected
nonprofits would occur based on need and ability to distribute the devices to qualifying recipients.Reporting could be integrated into a budget
amendment or the annual budget or tailored to Council preferences.Consistent donations are crucial for the program's success.This approach
improves operational efficiency,empowering IMS apprentices to prepare devices predictably.This also supports inventory management,avoiding
prolonged storage periods.A regular donation cycle benefits the community and facilitates the City's ability to efficiently donate more devices
each year.
Background/Discussion
SLC Computers for the Community Program,formally known as the Digital Equipment Donation Program,seeks to bridge the technology gap in
underserved communities,increase digital literacy,improve student achievement,and reduce the City's electronic waste output.
In September 2021,IMS and Youth&Family Services(Y&F)successfully completed the initial pilot phase of this program by donating 18 surplus
computers,along with keyboards and mice,to families and individuals who utilize their services.
In the second phase,IMS proposed that the City donate devices to community organizations that serve Salt Lake City's families and individuals in
need of digital resources.Phase two launched Spring 2023,with Salt Lake City donating 146 devices to five community-based organizations.
This was facilitated through a structured application process.Afterwards,the qualifying organizations distributed the refurbished computers to
their clients.All selected organizations have established digital literacy programs and demonstrated a feasible and equitable distribution plan.
Engaging with trusted community organizations substantially streamlined the donation process and ensured recipients receive digital literacy
training and support to successfully use their new device.
In a departure from past donation cycles,IMS leveraged the Apprenticeship Program through the Utah Department of Workforce Services for
computer refurbishment.This innovative approach involved apprentices,as opposed to full-time City employees,in the cleaning,repair,and
updating of devices.The integration of the Apprenticeship Program not only reduces the current refurbishing costs but also offers valuable work-
based learning experience for apprentices.
The recipients of the 2023 donation cycle include:
Salt Lake Community College's Basic Needs Tech Access Program,dedicated to assisting low-income college students,received 35 devices.
Nomad Alliance,dedicated to supportin unsheltered individuals,received 25 devices.
Catholic Community Services,serving refugee and new Americans,received 25 devices.
Club Ability,focused on aiding low-income Latino families and individuals with different abilities,received 35 devices
Youth&Family Services'Youth City,providing services to low-income children and teens,received 26 devices.
Prospective Applicant List
Below is a list of organizations that have expressed interest in the program and plan on applying once the program application opens:
Project Read Utah
Somali Self-Management Community Group
International Rescue Committee
Columbus Adult Education Center
Will the City Council need to hold a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
Public Hearing
Chief Administrator Officer's Comments
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
COMPUTER DONATION PROGRAM
COST ANALYSIS L
DECEMBER 2023
1 m!
Summary
Note 1: Depreciation Expense on Fleet Vehicles 418
Note 2: General Fund Administrative Fees 13,971
Note 3: Direct Labor/Personal Services 24,459
Total Annual Expenditures 38,848.49
Number of Devices(Laptops,Computers,Tablets) 325 >Somehow miscounted the number of Laptops,Commuters&Tablets for FY2023 in my pivot table formula
Cost per Device 119.53 Divide by number of devices to get Per Device Cost
Note 1: Depreciation Expense on Fleet Vehicles
Depreciation Annual
Vehicle Period Derived Depreciation
Count years) Est.Cost Percentage Costs
1 vehicles 20 21,334 21.30% 227 >Had not applied the percentage of total refurbished assets represented by Laptops,Computers&Tablets=42.6%in FY2023
Annual maintenace costs 191
418
Cost data per Denise Sorenson-Fleet)
Note 2: General Fund Administrative Fees
Allocated Derived
Fees per FY2023 to Departments Percentage
All City Depts(except IMS) 183,500 0.38% $ 700
CC:6565010 Dot Leadership&Financial Sys 1,872,709 0,38% 7,148
Blanco(computer wiping software) 6,123 100.00% 6,123
Total Armin Fees 2,062,332 13,971
Computer Donation FTE's 0.35
IMS FTEs 92.00
Note 3: Direct Labor/Personal Services
Job Title FTE Annual Cost pro rated share Costs
City Apprentice 0.7 29,231 38.34% $ 11,207 >Had not applied the percentage of total refurbished assets represented by Laptops,Computers&Tablets=42.6%in FY2023
Network Support Administrator I(Apprentice Supervisor) 1.0 100,452 4.26% 4,279 >Nole revised this estimate of work to 10%
Community Outreach SP&E Coordinator 1.0 100,104 2,13% 5,005
Property Control Agent 1.0 94,097 1.89% 1,777
Total Direct Salaries 22,268
Unbilled Building Costs
est.260 square feet per employee
24 per square feet costs(per Prop Mgt) 6,240
0.35 2,191
Total Direct labor and Unbilled Building Costs 24,459
Note 4: Full Time Equivalent(FTE)Information
IMS FTEs 92.00
I I
Note 5: Hours:1,624 annual base hours was computed as follows:
Total Hours Available Annually(40 hours x 52 weeks) 2,080
Less:Vacation(2.77 hours X 52 weeks or 3 weeks per year) 144
Less:Sick(0.77 hours x 52 weeks or 1 week per year) 40
Less:Breaks(260 days per year x 0.50 hours)130
Less:Holidays(8.0 hours x 12 days per year) 96
Less:Meetings/Training(estimate) 46
Annual Work Hours 1,624
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
COMPUTER DONATION PROGRAM
COST ANALYSIS
DECEMBER 2023 Y 9`t
iN rni
l,1,5,
Summary
Note 1: Depreciation Expense on Fleet Vehicles 418
Note 2: General Fund Administrative Fees 13,971
Note 3: Direct Labor/Personal Services 24,459
Total Annual Expenditures 38,848.49
Number of Devices(Laptops,Computers,Tablets) 325
Cost per Device 119.53 Divide by number of devices to get Per Device Cost
Note 1: Depreciation Expense on Fleet Vehicles
Depreciation Annual
Vehicle Period Derived Depreciation
Count years) Est.Cost Percentage Costs
1 vehicles 20 21,334 21.30% 227
Annual maintenace costs 191
418
Cost data per Denise Sorenson-Fleet)
Note 2: General Fund Administrative Fees
Allocated Derived
Fees per FY2023 to Departments Percentage
All City Depts(except IMS) 183,500 0.38% $ 700
CC:6565010 Dpt Leadership&Financial Svs 1,872,709 0.38% 7,148
Blanco(computer wiping software) 6,123 100.00% 6,123
Total Admin Fees 2,062,332 13,971
Computer Donation FTE's 0.35
IMS FTEs 92.00
Note 3: Direct Labor/Personal Services
Job Title FTE Annual Cost pro rated share Costs
City Apprentice 0.7 29,231 38.34% $11,207
Network Support Administrator I(Apprentice Supervisor)1.0 100,452 4.26%4,279
Community Outreach SP&E Coordinator 1.0 100,104 2.13%5,005
Property Control Agent 1.0 94,097 1.89%1,777
Total Direct Salaries 22,268
Unbilled Building Costs
est.260 square feet per employee
24 per square feet costs(per Prop Mgt) 6,240
0.35 2,191
Total Direct Labor and Unbilled Building Costs 24,459
Note 4: Full Time Equivalent(FTE)Information
IMS FTEs 92.00
Note 5: Hours:1,624 annual base hours was computed as follows:
Total Hours Available Annually(40 hours x 52 weeks) 2,080
Less:Vacation(2.77 hours X 52 weeks or 3 weeks per year) 144
Less:Sick(0.77 hours x 52 weeks or 1 week per year) 40
Less:Breaks(260 days per year x 0.50 hours) 130
Less:Holidays(8.0 hours x 12 days per year)96
Less:Meetings/Training(estimate) 46
Annual Work Hours 1,624
Departmer Departmer Division ID Division N,Cost Cent(Cost Cent(Employee Employee Job Code Job Title Pay Grade Old Class 1 FTE Pension C,
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 095992 BENTLEY,001578 CHIEF INF 041X 00ox 1 E1 CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 347770 JENSEN, i 002559 DIRECTOI 037X 600X 1 CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 360457 WALKING 002514 CHIEF INI`039X 00ox 1 CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 701716 LOPEZ II, 001801 NETWORI 025X 300X 1 T2CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 709517 ANTHONI 002271 FINANCIA 034X 600X 1 T2CN401 N
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 749770 KORB, CH 002816 DEPUTY C 039X 00ox 1 CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 776142 CORTES, 002749 FINANCIA 025X 600X 1 CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei 956961 BLACK, Hi 002749 FINANCIA 025X 600X 1 T2CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei new-4201 new-4201 001233 OFFICE F,019X 300X 1 T2CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4127 vac-4127 002559 DIRECTOI 036X 600X 1 T2CN
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4275 vac-4275 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4276 vac-4276 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4277 vac-4277 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4278 vac-4278 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4279 vac-4279 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4280 vac-4280 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4281 vac-4281 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4282 vac-4282 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4286 vac-4286 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
65000 Information 65036 Dpt Leade 6565010 Dpt Leadei vac-4288 vac-4288 001897 INTERN H HRYX 300X 0.7 T2EMP
Position T)Distributior Monthly SE Hourly Rat Annual Ho Hire Date Benefit Da Anniversar Terminate Comp Dato Salary Obj Salary Q1 Salary Q2 Salary Q3
DEPT 100 15048.8 86.82 2080 211101 45146 45146 45146
SAL 100 10427.73 60.16 2080 6/19/2000 6/19/2000 6/19/2000 6/19/2000 211101 31283 31283 31283
SAL 100 13774.8 79.47 2080 6/25/1998 11/9/1998 6/25/1998 6/25/1998 211101 41324 41324 41324
SAL 100 5354.27 30.89 2080 2/10/2021 5/15/2022 2/10/2021 2/10/2021 211101 16063 16063 16063
SAL 100 9240.4 53.31 2080 1/4/2021 1/4/2021 1/4/2021 1/4/2021 211101 27721 27721 27721
SAL 100 13448.93 77.59 2080 3/12/1990 5/2/1993 3/12/1990 3/12/1990 211101 40347 40347 40347
SAL 100 6097.87 35.18 2080 3/1/2021 3/1/2021 3/1/2021 3/1/2021 211101 18294 18294 18294
SAL 100 5503.33 31.75 2080 1/3/2022 1/3/2022 1/3/2022 1/3/2022 211101 16510 16510 16510
SAL 100 4470.27 25.79 2080 1/1/2024 1/1/2024 7/1/2023 1/1/2024 211101 0 0 13411
SAL 100 10961.6 63.24 2080 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 211101 32885 32885 32885
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
RPT 100 0 20 1456 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 7/1/2023 2161 7280 7280 7280
Salary Q4 Salary Tots Longevity(Longevity(Longevity(Longevity(Longevity(Longevity'Pension 0 Pension Q Pension Q Pension Q Pension Q Pension Tc
45146 180584 211102 375 375 375 375 1500 219115 8225 8225 8225 8225 32900
31283 125132 211102 375 375 375 375 1500 219115 5733 5733 5733 5733 22932
41324 165296 211102 375 375 375 375 1500 219115 7493 7493 7493 7493 29972
16063 64252 211102 0 0 0 0 0 219115 2725 2725 2725 2725 10900
27721 110884 211102 0 0 0 0 0 219115 2050 2050 2050 2050 8200
40347 161388 211102 375 375 375 375 1500 219115 7362 7362 7362 7362 29448
18294 73176 211102 0 0 0 0 0 219115 3332 3332 3332 3332 13328
16510 66040 211102 0 0 0 0 0 219115 2800 2800 2800 2800 11200
13411 26822 211102 0 0 0 0 0 219115 41 41 2282 2282 4646
32885 131540 211102 0 0 0 0 0 219115 5536 5536 5536 5536 22144
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7280 29120 216102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fica Objec Fica Q1 Fica Q2 Fica Q3 Fica Q4 Fica Total 401 K Obje 401 K Q1 401 K Q2 401 K Q3 401 K Q4 401 K Tota Insurance Insurance
219110 3593 1924 3593 3593 12703 219114 1373 1373 1373 1373 5492 2195 4181
219110 2441 2441 2441 2441 9764 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 4181
219110 3190 2827 3190 3190 12397 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 4181
219110 1248 1248 1248 1248 4992 219114 101 101 101 101 404 2195 1408
219110 2140 2140 2140 2140 8560 219114 2797 2797 2797 2797 11188 2195 4181
219110 3134 2953 3134 3134 12355 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 4181
219110 1418 1418 1418 1418 5672 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 3141
219110 1282 1282 1282 1282 5128 219114 104 104 104 104 416 2195 4181
219110 19 19 1045 1045 2128 219114 2 2 85 85 174 2195 0
219110 2535 2535 2535 2535 10140 219114 205 205 205 205 820 2195 4181
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
219110 0 0 0 0 0 219114 0 0 0 0 0 2195 0
Insurance Insurance Insurance Insurance HSA Objec HSA Q1 HSA Q2 HSA Q3 HSA Q4 HSA Total 501 C9 Obj 501 C9 Q1 501 C9 Q2 501 C9 Q3
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
1408 1408 1408 5632 219501 750 0 0 0 750 219118 158 158 158
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
3141 3141 3141 12564 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
0 4181 4181 8362 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 0 0 158
4181 4181 4181 16724 219501 1500 0 0 0 1500 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
0 0 0 0 219501 0 0 0 0 0 219118 158 158 158
501 C9 Q4 501 C9 Tot Shift Objec Shift Q1 Shift Q2 Shift Q3 Shift Q4 Shift Total Snow ObjE Snow Q1 Snow Q2 Snow Q3 Snow Q4 Snow Tota
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 316 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 211109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
158 632 216109 0 0 0 0 0 2148 0 0 0 0 0
Clothing/U Uniform Q Uniform G Uniform Q Uniform Q,Uniform Tc Tool Objec Tool Q1 Tool Q2 Tool Q3 Tool Q4 Tool Total Fire Objec Fire Q1
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
2171 0 0 0 0 0 2172 0 0 0 0 0 212105 0
Fire Q2 Fire Q3 Fire Q4 Fire Total CPath Obf CPath Q1 CPath 02 CPath Q3 CPath Q4 CPath Tots CPathEx C CPathEx C CPathEx C CPathEx C
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 213106 0 0 0 0 0 211106 0 0 0
CPathEx C CPathEx T Phone Obj Phone Q1 Phone Q2 Phone Q3 Phone Q4 Phone Tot Auto Objec Auto Q1 Auto Q2 Auto Q3 Auto Q4 Auto Total
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 1200 1200 1200 1200 4800
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 247 247 247 247 988 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 252701 0 0 0 0 0 2527 0 0 0 0 0
Educ Obje Educ Q1 Educ Q2 Educ Q3 Educ Q4 Educ Total Cert Objec Cert Q1 Cert Q2 Cert Q3 Cert Q4 Cert Total Total
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 257823
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 179172
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 228021
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 88550
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 158676
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 224535
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 107860
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 102628
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 43436
211104 0 0 0 0 0 211105 0 0 0 0 0 184488
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
216104 0 0 0 0 0 216105 0 0 0 0 0 29752
1,872,709.00
Missing 13 items in FY2023(Model Category)
Combined FY2023 FY2024 01 TNT Count Column LabelsE3
Laptops 165 FY2023
Computers 13C low high
Tablets 3C7 Access Point 54 54 54
Total 325 247 456 Computer 112 33 33 145
576 763 Computer Periphera 1 45 20 20 65
Desktop 32 1 1 33
56.42% 42.60% IP Device 43 43 43
Donations FY2023 FY2024 Ql low item estimate high items estimate IP Router 1 1 1 2
Laptops 128 1 P Switch 17 17 17
Laptop 78 7 7 85
Monitor 3 5 5 8
Missing 13 items Server 5 5 5 10
TNT count Column •_n Tablet 18 18
02023 02024 2024 Total Grand Total 2" 186 186 480
Computer 112 33 33 145
Laptop 78 7 7 85 Missing 202 items 174 in FY2023 Model Cote
Tablet 18 18
Grand Total 208 40 40 243
Missi 202 items Cables 4 6 6
Calculators 1 1
Card Scan 1 1
r Computer 18 1 1 19
Computer 18 1 1 Computer Peripheral 96 12 12 108
Laptop 97 69 69 Dock 1 1
Tablet 12 9 9 Docks 1 1
Grand Total 117 79 79 Keyboards 3 3 3 6
Laptop 97 69 69 156
Mice 1 1 1
Money Counter 1 1 1
Monitor 4 1 1 5
n/a 11 2 2 13
Pager 3 3
Printer 26 5 5 31
Scanner/Printer 1 1 j 1
Server 13 13
Tablet 12 9 9 21
TV 3 3 3
Typewriter 1 1
video cards 2 2 2
Grand Total 262 116 116 398
This page has intentionally been left blank
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
Mayor MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley,Chief Information Officer
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer
Date Sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 6/3/2024
Victoria Petro, Chair
FROM: Aaron Bentley
Chief Information Officer
Information Management Services
SUBJECT: SLC Computers for the Community Program (formally known as the Digital
Equipment Donation Program).
STAFF CONTACTS:
Nole Walkingshaw, Chief Innovation Officer,nole.walkingshaw(2slcgov.com
Hailey Leek, Innovation Team Lead, haile, .leekkslcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Public Benefits Analysis and Recommendation
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (see attachments)
Public Benefits Analysis
RECOMMENDATION:
A.)The Administration recommends that a public hearing be held on the matter of the Public
Benefits Analysis and that the Council consider adopting a resolution approving the
donation of up to 500 surplus computers the City no longer intends to use to local
nonprofits for distribution to community members in need.
B.)IMS proposes a change to improve the SLC Computers for the Community Program,
aiming for more consistent and timely service to community members. The current Public
Benefit Analysis process requires multiple Administrative functions such as preparing the
cost analysis, drafting a transmittal, and preparing a resolution. These steps hinder our ability
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 TEL 801-535-7704
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
Mayor MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley,Chief Information Officer
to develop a regular donation schedule. Recognizing the pressing need for computers and
growing interest from new partners,IMS suggests transitioning to quarterly donation cycles
to qualified nonprofits. This shift aligns with Utah Code 10-8-2, enabling donations to
nonprofits without conducting a public benefits analysis. While this means City programs
like Youth and Family Services may not directly provide computers, they endorse the change
and are willing to refer families to nonprofits that are awarded devices.
Under the proposed system,near the beginning of the fiscal year IMS would identify the
number of devices and related peripheral accessories that will be donated to nonprofits
organizations and will seek Council approval to proceed with such donations using an
incremental approach that contemplates distributing a number of the identified devices to
the identified nonprofit organizations. Such nonprofit organizations will be selected through
open applications for those nonprofits serving Salt Lake City residents. Allocations of the
identified devices to the selected nonprofits would occur based on need and ability to
distribute the devices to qualifying recipients. Reporting could be integrated into a budget
amendment or the annual budget or tailored to Council preferences. Consistent donations
are crucial for the program's success. This approach improves operational efficiency,
empowering IMS apprentices to prepare devices predictably.This also supports inventory
management, avoiding prolonged storage periods. A regular donation cycle benefits the
community and facilitates the City's ability to efficiently donate more devices each year.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The proposed action will not materially impact the City budget. In addition to the positive outcomes
for the community and the skill development of apprentices engaged in computer refurbishment,
the City stands to realize cost savings through reduced device storage expenses and support for
electronic recycling initiatives.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
SLC Computers for the Community Program, formally known as the Digital Equipment Donation
Program, seeks to bridge the technology gap in underserved communities,increase digital literacy,
improve student achievement, and reduce the City's electronic waste output.
In September 2021,IMS and Youth& Family Services (Y&F) successfully completed the initial pilot
phase of this program by donating 18 surplus computers, along with keyboards and mice, to families
and individuals who utilize their services.
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 TEL 801-535-7704
ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION
Mayor MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Aaron Bentley,Chief Information Officer
In the second phase, IMS proposed that the City donate devices to community organizations that
serve Salt Lake City's families and individuals in need of digital resources. Phase two launched
Spring 2023,with Salt Lake City donating 146 devices to five community-based organizations.
This was facilitated through a structured application process.Afterwards, the qualifying
organizations distributed the refurbished computers to their clients. All selected organizations have
established digital literacy programs and demonstrated a feasible and equitable distribution plan.
Engaging with trusted community organizations substantially streamlined the donation process and
ensured recipients receive digital literacy training and support to successfully use their new device.
In a departure from past donation cycles, IMS leveraged the Apprenticeship Program through the
Utah Department of Workforce Services for computer refurbishment.This innovative approach
involved apprentices, as opposed to full-time City employees,in the cleaning,repair, and updating of
devices. The integration of the Apprenticeship Program not only reduces the current refurbishing
costs but also offers valuable work-based learning experience for apprentices.
The recipients of the 2023 donation cycle include:
Salt Lake Community College's Basic Needs Tech Access Program, dedicated to assisting
low-income college students,received 35 devices.
Nomad Alliance, dedicated to supporting unsheltered individuals, received 25 devices.
Catholic Community Services, serving refugee and new Americans,received 25 devices.
Club Ability, focused on aiding low-income Latino families and individuals with different
abilities,received 35 devices
Youth&Family Services'Youth City, providing services to low-income children and teens,
received 26 devices.
Prospective Applicant List
Below is a list of organizations that have expressed interest in the program and plan on applying
once the program application opens:
Project Read Utah
Somali Self-Management Community Group
International Rescue Committee
Columbus Adult Education Center
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 TEL 801-535-7704
This page has intentionally been left blank
RESOLUTION NO. _____ OF 2024
Authorizing the Donation of Certain City Computers to Benefit Disadvantaged Communities
and Low-Moderate Income Families Through a Digital Donation Program)
WHEREAS, the donation of computers for which Salt Lake City (“City”) has no ongoing
need through the City’s SLC Computers for the Community Program advances the educational
and digital equity goals that the City supports; and
WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-8-2(1)(a)(v) allows public entities to authorize the
donation of City property to nonprofit entities after a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, though Utah Code Section 10-8-2 does not require a study for such
nonmonetary assistance, in this case the Salt Lake City Department of Finance has performed a
cost analysis related to the costs associated with disposition of City computers that have reached
end-of-life status (“Analysis”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has, following the giving of not less than fourteen (14) days
public notice, conducted a public hearing relating to the foregoing, in satisfaction of the
requirements of Utah Code Section 10-8-2; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the proposal provided by the City’s Information
Management Department (“IMS”) to donate up to 500 surplus City computers, including any
corresponding, keyboards, mice, or other peripheral accessories that are used with such
computers; has reviewed the Analysis provided in connection with the IMS proposal, and has
fully considered all comments made during the public hearing;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as
follows:
1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that, for all the reasons set forth in
the IMS Proposal and the accompanying Analysis, the donation of the identified computers and
peripheral accessories through the City’s SLC Computers for the Community Program is
appropriate under these circumstances. Consequently, the identified computers and peripheral
accessories may be donated to the local nonprofit organizations, in incremental distributions to be
determined by IMS, and with the expectation that such computers and peripheral accessories will
be distributed to community members.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _________, 2024.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By: ______________________
CHAIRPERSON
2
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney
Date:
6/7/2024________________
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
https://tinyurl.com/SmallCellsSLC
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Sylvia Richards
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: SLC Computers for the Community (formerly known as the Digital Equipment Donation
Program) - WRITTEN BRIEFING
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
In September of 2020, a policy for the Digital Equipment Donation Program was adopted.
Working with Youth & Family Services (Y&F), the City’s Innovation Team developed a pilot
program to address digital inequity within the community. One of the policy action items calls
for “increasing digital access via reliable and affordable devices”. In September of 2021, IMS
and Youth & Family Services began donating surplus computers, keyboards and mice to
families, individuals and non-profit organizations.
The Administration is now recommending that the Digital Equipment Donation Program be
renamed SLC Computers for the Community. Additionally, the Administration recommends
several changes to simplify the process. Prior to distributing the computers, the current
Public Benefits Analysis process requires the City to:
1) Prepare the cost analysis
2) Draft a transmittal
3) Prepare a resolution
The Administration indicates that these steps delay the progress of timely computer
distribution, and therefore suggests transitioning to a quarterly donation cycle which aligns
with State Code. Section 10-8-2 indicates a Public Hearing will still be required for donations
of computers, keyboards and mice; however, a cost-analysis study will no longer be required.
Near the beginning of the fiscal year, IMS would identify the number of devices and
accessories available for donation and request City Council approval.
1. Non-profits serving Salt Lake City residents would be chosen through an open
application process.
2. Allocation of the devices to the selected non-profits would occur based on need and
ability to distribute the devices to qualifying recipients.
Item Schedule:
Set Date: July 9, 2024
Written Briefing: July 9, 2024
Public Hearing: August 13, 2024
Potential Action: August 20, 2024
Page | 2
3. Results of distribution could be incorporated into a budget amendment, annual budget, or
provided in another manner according to the Council’s preference. Note: If these changes
are approved, City programs such as Youth & Family Services will no longer be able to
provide computers directly to their patrons; however, they can refer families to the non-
profits that are awarded the devices. The Youth & Family Services Division is aware of
this change and agrees with the recommended changes. Over fiscal year 2024-25, it is
anticipated that there will be approximately 500 computers available to donate.
The schedule is as follows:
Written Briefing and Set Date July 9th
Public Hearing: August 13th formal meeting
Potential Action: August 20th formal meeting.
BUDGET IMPACT
The transmittal indicates there will be very little impact to the City budget because of these
changes. The anticipated benefits using the new approach include reduced device storage
expenses, devices prepared predictably by apprentices, and improved operational efficiency in
IMS.
METRICS
With respect to measuring program success, the Administration will be using questionnaires
to track the distribution of the receivers. The application requests the following information
from the organizations distributing the computers:
a) A brief overview of how the distribution process and digital literacy program was
accomplished
b) Zip codes of computer recipients
c) Age of recipients
Council staff asked what criteria will be used by community organizations (if any) to
distribute the computers. The Administration indicated they are assuming that the
community organizations are working with a variety of individuals from differing
backgrounds who qualify for their services and as such they did not want to be overly specific.
This is an area where they will evaluate moving forward.
POLICY QUESTION
➢The Council may wish to ask IMS for an update on the expansion and
availability of free Wi-Fi networks throughout the City, specifically
available for families who may not otherwise have internet service.
The information listed below identifies the non-profits which received the donated computers
during FY2023. The Administration will have75 computers available July 1st for donation.
YEAR NON-PROFITS RECEIVING
DONATED DEVICES
NUMBER OF
DONATED ITEMS
2023 Salt Lake Community College’s
Basic Needs Tech Access Program
35 devices
Page | 3
assisting low-income college
students
2023 Nomad Alliance supporting
unsheltered individuals
25
2023 Catholic Community Services 25
2023 Club Ability aiding low-income
Latino families & individuals with
different abilities
35
2023 Youth & Family Services
YouthCity providing services to
low-income children & teens
26
Total of 146
The following organizations have expressed interest and plan to apply for used computers:
•Project Read Utah
•Somali Self-Management Community Group
•Int’l Rescue Committee
•Columbus Adult Education Center
Item I4
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet
Policy Analyst
DATE:July 9, 2024
RE: MOTION SHEET – COUNCIL ACTION: First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement, Utah
Inland Port Authority
MOTION 1
I move that the Council adopt a resolution approving the first amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with the
Utah Inland Port Authority.
MOTION 2
I move that the Council reject the resolution.
COUNCIL STAFF
REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst
DATE: July 9, 2024
RE:First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement,
Utah Inland Port Authority
PROJECT TIMELINE:
Briefing: July 9, 2024
Set Date: N/A
Public Hearing: N/A
Potential Action: July 9, 2024
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will receive a briefing on a proposed amendments to the interlocal agreement between Salt
Lake City, The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) and the Utah Inland Port Authority (UIPA).
In October of 2022, UIPA, the City, and the RDA executed an interlocal cooperation agreement to comply
with Utah law, to establish a contractual relationship creating certainty on the 25-year distribution of the
City Differential to UIPA and to commit to a process for the expenditure of a portion of the City Differential
and the efficient processing of land use applications relating to authority jurisdictional land. The parties
committed to spending differential on a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and a Traffic Study and a
Community Impact Assessment (CIA). Those were to be completed by 2023.
Since then, the Parties have engaged in collaborative discussions with each other and with community
stakeholders and have concluded that rather than conducting an HIA, Traffic Study, and CIA, a portion of
the Community Differential and Environmental Differential would be more productively spent to establish
a baseline evaluation of current development trends and potential outcomes in the port authority
jurisdictional land and the Northwest Quadrant.
Based on those discussions, UIPA, the City and RDA are recommending the following changes to the
interlocal agreement (Transmittal Letter page 2):
Page | 2
•Removes the requirement that the Parties complete a Health Impact Assessment; a Traffic Study;
and a Community Impact Assessment by the end of 2023.
- Replaces these studies with a requirement to create a Baseline Study and a Preferred
Scenario.
- The Baseline Study will analyze current development trends and inform the Parties on how
the port authority jurisdictional land and Northwest Quadrant would be developed if the
development continues on pace with these trends.
- The Preferred Scenario will be created through an analysis of the Baseline Study and
through community engagement to determine what/how the various stakeholders desire
these areas to be developed.
•The Preferred Scenario will include a list of preferred potential projects and a matrix to identify
other potential projects to effectuate the goals identified in the Preferred Scenario.
•The Community Mitigation and Environmental Mitigation Differential will be spent first on
engaging one or more firms to create the Baseline Scenario and the Preferred Scenario.
•Any additional Community Mitigation and Environmental Mitigation Differential will be spent on
either UIPA’s community enrichment grants or other projects to be mutually agreed upon by the
Parties.
- The Parties will work to establish a shared set of standards for issuing the grants.
•After the Preferred Scenario is complete, the Community Mitigation and Environmental Mitigation
Differential will be spent on projects identified in the Preferred Scenario or established through the
Preferred Scenario matrix.
- The Parties will both identify preferred projects annually to the UIPA Board
These changes outlined in the Interlocal Agreement were approved by the UIPA Board on April 29, 2023.
These changes must be approved by both the City Council and the RDA. The briefing will be held during
the June 9 RDA meeting. It will then be on the June 9 Council Meeting as a written briefing and then
potentially adopted later during the formal meeting
POLICY QUESTIONS
Some Council/Board Members have been asked about the environmental mitigation differential funds
being used on projects that were not identified and supported by the city’s northwest quadrant review
committee.
The Council may wish to ask the Administration for additional background on how
it is decided that differential funds are spent.
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
Transmittal Form Combined Attachment
To:
Salt Lake City Council Chair
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency Chair
Start Date:
05/23/2024
Date Sent to Council:
05/28/2024
From:
Employee Name:
Katie Lewis, City Attorney
E-mail
katherine.lewis@slcgov.com
Department
Attorney
Department Director Signature
Director Signed Date
05/23/2024
Subject:
First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement, Utah Inland Port Authority
Additional Staff Contact:
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff, rachel.otto@slcgov.com
Presenters/Staff Table
Katie Lewis, katherine.lewis@slcgov.com, City Attorney
Rachel Otto, rachel.otto@slcgov.com, Chief of Staff
Document Type *
Resolution
Budget Impact *
Yes
No
Budget Impact:
Recommendation:*
Vote to Approve; Both the RDA Board and the City Council
Background/Discussion
On April 29, 2024, the Board of the Utah Inland Port Authority (“UIPA”) authorized UIPA Executive Director Ben Hart to execute a First Amendment to Interlocal
Agreement (“First Amendment”) between UIPA, Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”), and the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“RDA”).
The Salt Lake City Council and the Board of the RDA now may consider whether to authorize Mayor Mendenhall to execute the First Amendment on behalf of the City
and the RDA.
Background:
In 2022, the Utah Legislature enacted HB443, which revised Utah Code §§ 11-58-102, et seq. (the “Inland Port Act”) to change how much property tax differential
generated in Salt Lake City that UIPA will receive, and to specify how UIPA may spend portions of the that property tax differential.
On October 25, 2022, to comply with HB443, UIPA, the City, and the RDA executed an interlocal cooperation agreement to comply with Utah law, to establish a
contractual relationship creating certainty on the 25-year distribution of the City Differential to UIPA and to commit to a process for the expenditure of a portion of
the City Differential and the efficient processing of land use applications relating to authority jurisdictional land.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Parties committed to spending a portion of the City Differential defined in the Agreement as Environmental Differential as follows: (a)
to engage an outside firm with national expertise to prepare a health impact assessment (“HIA”) analyzing the planned inland port development in the authority
jurisdictional land within the City; and (b) to engage an outside firm with national expertise to prepare a traffic study using data-based analysis on best practices to
mitigate environmental impacts on communities related to logistics hubs, railyards, and truck traffic (“Traffic Study ”).
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Parties also committed to spending the first portion of the City Differential defined in the Agreement as the Community Differential
to engage an outside firm with national expertise in community impact assessments to create a comprehensive community impact assessment (“CIA”) for the
5/29/24, 3:41 PM CAO Review
https://slcidme.slcgov.com/Forms/form/submission/history/27840/63525?hideHeader=true&showInstanceDetails=false&fromInstances=true 1/2
Previous Next
planned inland port development in the authority jurisdictional land and the impacts on the Westside Community (defined in the Agreement).
The Parties agreed that the HIA, Traffic Study, and CIA would be complete by December 31, 2023.
Since executing the Agreement, the Parties have engaged in collaborative discussions with each other and with community stakeholders.
The Parties have concluded that, rather than conducting an HIA, Traffic Study, and CIA, a portion of the Community Differential and Environmental Differential would
be more productively spent to establish a baseline evaluation of current development trends and potential outcomes in the port authority jurisdictional land and the
Northwest Quadrant. After establishing the baseline evaluation, the Parties desire to establish a mutually agreed upon preferred scenario for future development in
the port authority jurisdictional land and the Northwest Quadrant. This preferred scenario would be intended to establish policies and metrics that could serve as an
evaluation tool for allocating future resources from the Parties and could also identify potential changes, if any, to the City ’s adopted Northwest Quadrant Plan.
UIPA and the City engaged in negotiations to amend the Agreement to reflect this new agreement related to the baseline and preferred scenarios. The attached First
Amendment to Interlocal Agreement, which was approved by the UIPA Board on April 29, 2023, does the following:
-Removes the requirement that the Parties complete a Health Impact Assessment; a Traffic Study; and a Community Impact Assessment by the end of 2023.
-Replaces these studies with a requirement to create a Baseline Study and a Preferred Scenario.
o The Baseline Study will analyze current development trends and inform the Parties on how the port authority jurisdictional land and Northwest Quadrant would
be developed if the development continues on pace with these trends.
o The Preferred Scenario will be created through an analysis of the Baseline Study and through community engagement to determine what/how the various
stakeholders desire these areas to be developed.
-The Preferred Scenario will include a list of preferred potential projects and a matrix to identify other potential projects to effectuate the goals identified in the
Preferred Scenario.
-The Community Mitigation and Environmental Mitigation Differential will be spent first on engaging one or more firms to create the Baseline Scenario and the
Preferred Scenario.
-Any additional Community Mitigation and Environmental Mitigation Differential will be spent on either UIPA’s community enrichment grants or other projects to
be mutually agreed upon by the Parties.
o The Parties will work to establish a shared set of standards for issuing the grants.
-After the Preferred Scenario is complete, the Community Mitigation and Environmental Mitigation Differential will be spent on projects identified in the Preferred
Scenario or established through the Preferred Scenario matrix.
-The Parties will both identify preferred projects annually to the UIPA Board
Will the City Council need to hold a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
Work session discussion; vote by RDA Board and City Council to authorize execution of the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement
Chief Administrator Officer's Comments
Attachment(s)
Combined attachements.pdf 1.21MB
5/29/24, 3:41 PM CAO Review
https://slcidme.slcgov.com/Forms/form/submission/history/27840/63525?hideHeader=true&showInstanceDetails=false&fromInstances=true 2/2
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
Previous Next
Transmittal Form Combined Attachment
Chief Administrator Officer's Signature *
Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
05/28/2024
Link to view combined attachments in Laserfiche
5/29/24, 3:42 PM CAO Review
https://slcidme.slcgov.com/Forms/form/submission/history/27840/63525?hideHeader=true&showInstanceDetails=false&fromInstances=true 1/1
1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
(“First Amendment”) is dated _____________, 2024, to be effective on the date the last keeper
of records for each Party attests and files the Agreement (“Effective Date”), by and between Salt
Lake City Corporation, a Utah municipal corporation (“City”), the Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City, a Utah public entity (“RDA”), and the Utah Inland Port Authority (“UIPA”), a Utah
public entity. The City, RDA, and UIPA are sometimes referred to individually as “Party” and
collectively as the “Parties.”
R E C I T A L S
A. During the general 2022 Utah legislative session, the Utah Legislature enacted HB443,
which revised Utah Code §§ 11-58-102, et seq. (the “Inland Port Act”) to change, among
other things, the distribution from Salt Lake County to UIPA, the City and the RDA of
exempt area property tax differential, (defined in Utah law as the portion of property tax
differential generated by a property tax levied by Salt Lake City in the port authority
jurisdictional land (“City Differential”). Specifically, Utah Code Ann. § 58-11-604(4)
specifies how UIPA may spend portions of the City Differential.
B. On October 25, 2022, the Parties executed an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement (the
“Agreement”) to comply with Utah law, to establish a contractual relationship creating
certainty on the 25-year distribution of the City Differential to UIPA and to commit to a
process for the expenditure of a portion of the City Differential and the efficient processing
of land use applications relating to authority jurisdictional land.
C. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Parties committed to spending a portion of the City
Differential defined in the Agreement as Environmental Differential as follows: (a) to
engage an outside firm with national expertise to prepare a health impact assessment
(“HIA”) analyzing the planned inland port development in the authority jurisdictional land
within the City; and (b) to engage an outside firm with national expertise to prepare a
traffic study using data-based analysis on best practices to mitigate environmental impacts
on communities related to logistics hubs, railyards, and truck traffic (“Traffic Study”).
D. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Parties committed to spending the first portion of the City
Differential defined in the Agreement as the Community Differential to engage an outside
firm with national expertise in community impact assessments to create a comprehensive
community impact assessment (“CIA”) for the planned inland port development in the
authority jurisdictional land and the impacts on the Westside Community (defined in the
Agreement).
2
E. The Parties agreed that the HIA, Traffic Study, and CIA would be complete by December
31, 2023.
F. Since executing the Agreement, the Parties have engaged in collaborative discussions with
each other and with community stakeholders. The Parties agree that, rather than
conducting an HIA, Traffic Study, and CIA, a portion of the Community Differential and
Environmental Differential would be more productively spent to establish a baseline
evaluation of current development trends and potential outcomes in the port authority
jurisdictional land and the Northwest Quadrant. After establishing the baseline evaluation,
the Parties desire to establish a mutually agreed upon preferred scenario for future
development in the port authority jurisdictional land and the Northwest Quadrant. This
preferred scenario would be intended to establish policies and metrics that could serve as
an evaluation tool for allocating future resources from the Parties and could also identify
potential changes, if any, to the City’s adopted Northwest Quadrant Plan. All parties
recognize that the UIPA is not responsible for the development trends or any conclusions
reached in the baseline scenario.
G. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to reflect this new agreement.
For good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows.
Any sections of the Agreement that are not specifically amended in this First Amendment shall
remain in full force in effect. To the extent there is a conflict between the Agreement and this First
Amendment, this First Amendment will control.
1. Expenditure of the City Generated Differential. During the term of the Agreement,
within a week of receiving the 25% Set Percentage and the Decreasing Percentage (defined
in the Agreement, and collectively, the “City Generated Differential”), UIPA will notify
the City of the amount of City Generated Differential it received. UIPA shall spend the
City Generated Differential as follows and pursuant to the process set forth in Section 1(e),
below:
a. Baseline and Preferred Scenario Studies. The Parties agree that a portion of the
City Generated Differential (both the Environmental Differential and the
Community Differential, defined below and in the Agreement) will be initially
spent on the following:
i. Baseline Study. After engaging in a competitive process in which the
Parties will, at a minimum, have an equal role on the selection committee,
the Parties will select and the UIPA will engage a mutually agreed-upon
outside firm (which may subcontract with other firms for subject-matter
expertise) to analyze the current development trends in the port authority
jurisdictional land and the broader Northwest Quadrant, including by
3
studying current traffic trends, possible health impacts of current
development, and possible community and environmental impacts related
to current development in these areas (“Baseline Study”). The Baseline
Study will consider current development trends in the port authority
jurisdictional land based on current zoning and the broader Northwest
Quadrant, using existing data related to building permit
issuance/applications and requests for increased capacity in public
infrastructure. The Baseline Study will also rely on existing
environmental, traffic, emissions, and demographic data and plans
compiled by Salt Lake City department experts. The purpose of the
Baseline Study will be to identify the potential impacts on the community,
environment (including air quality, water quality, water resources, habitat,
wetlands and the ecosystem), residents, economic development, including
job creation (types and number of jobs) and Salt Lake City if development
continues on pace with the trends identified in the Baseline Study.
ii. Preferred Scenario. Upon completion of the Baseline Study, after
engaging in a competitive process in which the Parties will, at a minimum,
have an equal role on the selection committee, the Parties will select and
the UIPA will engage a mutually agreed-upon outside firm (which may
subcontract with other firms for subject-matter expertise) to identify a
preferred development scenario for the Northwest Quadrant; the port
authority jurisdictional land; the property adjacent to the Salt Lake City
International Airport; and property directly affected by development in
the port authority jurisdictional land, including the Great Salt Lake
shoreline heritage area. The preferred development scenario will take into
account the trends identified by the UIPA Logistics Study, UIPA
Sustainability Study, Baseline Study, as well as the Parties and
stakeholders’ objectives related to optimal economic growth, optimal
logistics strategies, community mitigation, environmental preservation,
water consumption and water quality, air quality and related human health
impacts, sustainable transportation, job creation (both types of jobs and
numbers of jobs) and economic development (“Preferred Scenario”).
The outside firm will establish the preferred scenario by engaging with
the community, Salt Lake City Corporation, property owners, developers,
Northwest Quadrant jurisdiction businesses, and the UIPA Board, and
taking into consideration the priorities of each entity. Such engagement
will include conducting a robust and equitable community engagement
process using various means of engagement, including, but not limited to
public hearings, multiple-language meetings, and small group meetings
with key stakeholders and leaders within the community. The outside
firm may compensate these community members and stakeholders for
their participation in the engagement process, consistent with current city
4
policies and prior precedent. This engagement will be to effectuate the
objective of creating new policies and matrices to guide future decisions
related to the expenditure of the Environmental Differential, and
Community Differential. The Preferred Scenario will include a list of
potential projects or investments the Parties could make to effectuate the
Preferred Scenario (“Preferred Projects”), which will help the Parties
prioritize the expenditure of the Environmental Differential and the
Community Differential, pursuant to Utah law. In addition, the Preferred
Scenario will establish policies and metrics to serve as an evaluation tool
for allocating future resources from the Parties, a plan for regular status
reviews and long-term accountability to ensure the policies and matrices
continue to achieve the Parties’ objectives under the Preferred Scenario.
The Preferred Scenario will identify which policies and metrics are within
the scope of authority of UIPA, the City, and/or other entities. The
Preferred Scenario could also identify potential changes, if any, to the
City’s adopted Northwest Quadrant Plan. The UIPA Board has the
authority to make all final funding determinations consistent with this
First Amendment and State law. The preferred scenario will provide
guidance where any conflicts occur, except in cases where there are cross-
cutting regulatory or legal obligations that the parties are required to meet
future plans. In such an instance, the Parties will work towards
maintaining the intent of the Preferred Scenario while meeting regulatory
and legal obligations.
b. Upon completion of the Preferred Scenario, the outside firm will present the
findings and recommendations to the Salt Lake City Council and the UIPA Board,
in public meetings, which include public comment opportunities, for potential
formal adoption.
c. Environmental Mitigation Projects within the Authority Jurisdictional Land: Under
Utah law, UIPA will spend 40% of the City Generated Differential on
environmental mitigation projects in the authority jurisdictional land within the
City (“Environmental Differential”) according to the following:
i. A portion of the Environmental Differential will be used by the City and
UIPA to engage the mutually agreed upon and selected outside firm to
create the Baseline Study and Preferred Scenario in a timely manner. Any
additional Environmental Differential will be spent on either UIPA’s
Community Enrichment Grants or other projects, to be mutually agreed
upon by the Parties under the terms of this First Amendment.
ii. While the Baseline Study and Preferred Scenario are being established,
any unspent Environmental Differential may fund UIPA’s Community
5
Enrichment Grants, particularly grants that mitigate the environmental
impacts on Salt Lake City related to the development of the authority
jurisdictional land. Such environmental mitigation projects may include,
but are not limited to, net zero, electric, or equivalent building; mitigation
of truck traffic; protection of wetlands and other areas important to the
function of the Great Salt Lake and habitat; construction that supports
migratory bird patterns in and around the jurisdictional land; low water
usage; solar or renewable energy and/or transportation electrification,
including rail, trucks, vans, transit and non-road vehicles and projects
related to rail and clean air. The Parties agree that the City and UIPA will
establish mutually agreed upon standards for the Community Enrichment
Grant applications, prior to releasing any grant applications, to ensure that
the Environmental Differential is being allocated pursuant to Utah law.
iii. Expenditure of the Environmental Differential for Community
Enrichment Grants will only occur after the City and UIPA follow the
process described in Section 1(e) below. After the establishment of the
Baseline Study and Preferred Scenario, the Environmental Differential
may fund the Preferred Projects, which will be prioritized pursuant to the
process described in Section 1(e) below. So long as it is consistent with
this First Amendment and State law, the UIPA board will maintain final
approval of any expenditure for Environmental Differential.
d. Mitigation Projects for Communities within the City. UIPA will spend 40% of the
City Generated Differential (“Community Differential”) on mitigation projects
for communities that are within the City; are adjacent to the authority jurisdictional
land; and are west of the east boundary of the right of way of commuter rail used
by the City (“Westside Community”) according to the following:
i. A portion of the Community Differential will be used by the City and
UIPA to engage the mutually agreed upon and selected outside firm to
create the Baseline Study and Preferred Scenario in a timely manner. Any
additional Community Differential will be spent on either UIPA’s
Community Enrichment Grants or other projects, to be mutually agreed
upon by the Parties under the terms of this First Amendment.
ii. While the Baseline Study and Preferred Scenario are being established,
any unspent Community Differential may fund UIPA’s Community
Enrichment Grants, particularly grants that mitigate the impacts of
development of the port authority jurisdictional land on the Westside
Community, including but not limited to, projects that address
community-identified priorities, including creating quiet zones, railroad
crossings, new infrastructure to benefit adjacent communities,
6
apprenticeship programs, career and youth development, and scholarships
for certain careers associated with UIPA, and clean air opportunities
related to rail. The Parties agree that the City and UIPA will establish
mutually agreed upon standards for the Community Enrichment Grant
applications, prior to releasing any grant applications, to ensure that the
Community Differential is being allocated pursuant to Utah law.
iii. Expenditure of the Community Differential for Community Enrichment
Grants will only occur after the City and UIPA follow the process
described in Section 1(e) below. After the establishment of the Baseline
Study and Preferred Scenario, the Community Differential will fund the
Preferred Projects, which will be prioritized pursuant to the process
described in Section 1(e) below. So long as it is consistent with this First
Amendment and State law, the UIPA board will maintain final approval
of any expenditure for Community Differential.
iv.
Process to Review and Identify Expenditures for the Environmental Differential and
Community Differential. During each fiscal year, within 30 days after receiving the amount
of City Differential from the County, the UIPA executive team will first allocate sufficient
Environmental Differential and Community Differential to complete the Baseline Study
and Preferred Scenario in a timely manner. If Environmental Differential and Community
Differential remain unallocated, the UIPA executive team will develop a list of priority
projects to spend the Environmental Differential and Community Differential (collectively,
the “Mitigation Money”), in conformance with the priorities of this First Amendment. By
April 15 of each year, the UIPA executive team will submit any proposed use of Mitigation
Money to the City’s advisory group of experts, via the Mayor’s office, which will be
comprised of members of City departments, including but not limited to, the
Redevelopment Agency, Community and Neighborhoods, Public Utilities, and
Sustainability, Mayor’s Office and Council Office, and stakeholders invested in the City’s
Northwest Quadrant including the Audubon Society and community leaders from westside
neighborhoods (“NWQ Review Group”). The NWQ Review Group may develop a
separate list of priority projects to spend the Mitigation Money. If the NWQ Review Group
develops a separate list of priority projects, the NWQ Review Group will share this list
with the UIPA executive team no later than May 1 of each year.
e. The UIPA team and representatives of the NWQ Review Group will seek to
develop a joint recommendation to be presented to UIPA’s board no later than June
15 of each year. The Parties anticipate that there will always be more ways to spend
the Mitigation Money than there is money available. If there is no agreement on a
joint recommendation, the NWQ Review Group’s identified projects and the UIPA
executive team’s identified projects will both be submitted to the UIPA Board.
Upon completion of the Preferred Scenario, the Parties agree that the list of priority
projects will either be the Preferred Projects identified in the Preferred Scenario or
7
will be identified using the policies and matrices established in the Preferred
Scenario and within the scope of authority of the City and/or the UIPA. In all
events, UIPA’s board shall consider the budget requests and approve a budget after
a public hearing at a public meeting located within Salt Lake City boundaries, and
such budget will include line-item approval of projects for the expenditure of the
Mitigation Money. The UIPA board may approve a multi-year option for
significant projects, so long as such projects are consistent with this First
Amendment and State law.
f. Economic Development Activities. UIPA will spend the remaining 20% of the
City’s Property Tax on economic development projects within the authority
jurisdictional land in Salt Lake City. UIPA will use commercially reasonable efforts
to incentivize economic development projects that align with Preferred Scenario,
the City’s Northwest Quadrant Master Plan, and/or the UIPA Northwest Quadrant
Project Area Plan.
2. Interlocal Cooperation Act. In satisfaction of the requirements of the Interlocal
Cooperation Act, and in connection with this Agreement, the Parties agree as follows:
(a) This Agreement shall be approved by each Party pursuant to Utah Code §11-13-
202.5 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, including by the Board of the RDA, the
Salt Lake City Council, and the UIPA Board of Directors.
(b) This Agreement shall be reviewed as to proper form and compliance with
applicable law by a duly authorized attorney on behalf of each Party, pursuant to
Utah Code §11-13-202.5 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act.
(c) A duly executed original counterpart of this Agreement shall be filed with keeper
of records of each Party, pursuant to Utah Code §11-13-209 of the Interlocal
Cooperation Act.
(d) Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, each Party shall be responsible
for its own costs of any action taken pursuant to this Agreement, and for any
financing of such costs.
(e) Any Party may withdraw from the joint or cooperative undertaking described in
this Agreement only upon the termination of this Agreement.
(f) No real or personal property shall be acquired jointly by the Parties as a result of this
Agreement. To the extent that a Party acquires, holds, or disposes of any real or
personal property for use in the joint or cooperative undertaking contemplated by this
Agreement, such Party shall do so in the same manner that it deals with other
property of such Party.
(g) No joint board or entity is created through this Agreement.
8
(h)The functions to be performed by the joint or cooperative undertaking are those
described in this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties are executing this First Amendment to Interlocal
Agreement to be effective as of the Effective Date.
Utah Inland Port Authority, a Utah public
entity
_______________________________
Name:__________________________
Title:___________________________
Approved as to Proper Form and
Compliance with Applicable Law:
______________________________
_____________, Attorney for Utah Inland
Port Authority
Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah
municipal corporation
______________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Approved as to Proper Form and Compliance
with Applicable Law:
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City,
a Utah public entity
___________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Approved as to Proper Form and
Compliance with Applicable Law:
____________________________________
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
Attest:
_________________________________
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Ben Hart
Executive Director
This page has intentionally been left blank
RESOLUTION NO. OF 2024
(A Resolution Approving the First Amendment to Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
(Utah Inland Port Authority))
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, the Utah Inland Port Authority (“UIPA”), the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“RDA”), and Salt Lake City Corporation
(“City”, and collectively with the UIPA and RDA, the “Parties”) executed an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement (“Interlocal Agreement”), setting forth a process for distribution
and expenditure of City Differential (as defined in the Interlocal Agreement).
WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Interlocal Agreement to address
the expenditure of the City Differential.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake
City Board of Directors that the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement, in the form
attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby approved.
Passed by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City Board of Directors this
day of , 2024.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Alejandro Puy, Chair
Attest:
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to form:
Katherine Lewis (May 21, 2024 15:39 MDT)
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION
[Attach First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement ]
This page has intentionally been left blank
RESOLUTION NO. OF 2024
(A Resolution Approving the First Amendment to Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
(Utah Inland Port Authority))
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2022, the Utah Inland Port Authority (“UIPA”), the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“RDA”), and Salt Lake City Corporation
(“City”, and collectively with the UIPA and RDA, the “Parties”) executed an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement (“Interlocal Agreement”), setting forth a process for distribution
and expenditure of City Differential (as defined in the Interlocal Agreement).
WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to amend the Interlocal Agreement to address
the expenditure of the City Differential.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City that the
First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement, in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit
A, is hereby approved.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2024.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
Victoria Petro, Chair
Attest:
Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved as to form:
Katherine Lewis, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION
[Attach First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement ]
This page has intentionally been left blank
This page has intentionally been left blank
2
0
5
8
7
City Council Announcements
July 9, 2024
Information Needed
A. August Council Meetings
We have heard that multiple Council Members may be out for the scheduled August 20, 2024
Council Meeting.
➢Will we have a quorum this day, or will the meeting need to be rescheduled?
➢If the meeting is rescheduled, would Tuesday, August 27, 2024 be best?
▪If the meeting is moved, 2 consent items will need to be corrected this evening.
B. Off-Site Council Meeting
This year's off-site Council Meeting is planned for Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at the Sorensen
Center.
➢Does this work for everyone’s schedule?
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
SWORN STATEMENT SUPPORTING CLOSURE OF MEETING
I, ____________ , acted as the presiding member of the _______________________________in which met on _________
Appropriate notice was given of the Council's meeting as required by §52-4-202.
A quorum of the Council was present at the meeting and voted by at least a two-thirds vote, as detailed in the minutes of
the open meeting, to close a portion of the meeting to discuss the following:
§52-4-205(l)(a) discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an
individual;
§52 -4-205(1 )(b) strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
§52-4-205(l )(c) strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
§52-4-205( l )(d) strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including
any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the
appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from
completing the transaction on the best possible terms;
§52-4-205(l )(e) strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right
or water shares if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: ((A) disclose the appraisal or estimated
value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction
on the best possible terms; (ii) if the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale;
§52-4-205(1)(f) discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
§52-4-205(1)(g) investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A Closed Meeting may also be held for Attorney-Client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code
§78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and
Public Meetings Act.
Other, described as follows: ____________________________________________________________
The content of the closed portion of the Council meeting was restricted to a discussion of the matter(s) for which the
meeting was closed.
With regard to the closed meeting, the following was publicly announced and recorded, and entered on the minutes of the
open meeting at which the closed meeting was approved:
(a)the reason or reasons for holding the closed meeting;
(b)the location where the closed meeting will be held; and
(c)the vote of each member of the public body either for or against the motion to hold the closed meeting.
The recording and any minutes of the closed meeting will include:
(a)the date, time, and place of the meeting;
(b)the names of members Present and Absent; and
(c)the names of all others present except where such disclosure would infringe on the confidentiality
necessary to fulfill the original purpose of closing the meeting.
Pursuant to §52-4-206(6),a sworn statement is required to close a meeting under §52-4-205(1)(a) or (f), but a record by
tape recording or detailed minutes is not required; and Pursuant to §52-4-206(1), a record by tape recording and/or
detailed written minutes is required for a meeting closed under §52-4-205(1)(b),(c),(d),(e),and (g):
A record was not made.
A record was made by: : Tape recording Detailed written minutes
I hereby swear or affin11 under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
Presiding Member Date of Signature
Salt Lake City CouncilVictoria Petro July 9, 2024
4
44
Victoria Petro җJul рр, 2024 ртѷ4ф Ҙ Jul рр, 2024
Closed Session - Sworn Statement
Final Audit Report 2024-07-11
Created:2024-07-09
By:Michelle Barney (michelle.barney@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAZ305j3ZGlYh8bnW7tsNkRTlkTWZpb0z2
"Closed Session - Sworn Statement" History
Document created by Michelle Barney (michelle.barney@slcgov.com)
2024-07-09 - 10:32:02 PM GMT
Document emailed to victoria.petro@slcgov.com for signature
2024-07-09 - 11:26:55 PM GMT
Email viewed by victoria.petro@slcgov.com
2024-07-11 - 0:47:35 AM GMT
Signer victoria.petro@slcgov.com entered name at signing as Victoria Petro
2024-07-11 - 7:45:13 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Victoria Petro (victoria.petro@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2024-07-11 - 7:45:15 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2024-07-11 - 7:45:15 PM GMT