Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
01/09/2025 - Meeting Materials
Agenda for Board of Equalization Meeting
Date: January 9, 2025
Time: 1:00 PM MST
1. Call to Order
a. Confirm Public Meeting Rules and Scope of the Board of Equalization (BOE).
b. Overview of meeting procedures.
c. Introductions of all Board Members and relevant parties.
2. Approve previous meeting minutes, should they be ready.
3. Public Comment Period – Facilitator: Gaby
a. Public comment will be accepted.
b. Each speaker will be limited to 5 minutes.
4. Discussion of Final Recommendations
a. Board members will discuss and finalize recommendations to be included in the
Board of Equalization report to the City Council.
b. Review of any adjustments or recommendations pending approval.
5. Adjournment
a. Motion to adjourn the meeting.
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION
1. Robert Larkin, Larkin Mortuary
a. Feels there is minimal benefit to the SAA for the following reasons:
i. Not receiving holiday lighting
ii. Does not address issues with homelessness, blight, and trespassing
iii. Requesting an adjustment in their assessment amount due to minimal
benefit.
2. Brent Bowen, 42 Exchange Place
a. Questions on:
i. charging both frontage sides for holiday lighting assessment if
property is a corner lot.
ii. Frontage figures in assessment notice are not accurate to what the
County assessor provides.
UPDATED INFORMATION FOR THE BOE: This property does not receive holiday lighting
and is not on the holiday lighting map. The holiday lighting assessment charge is incorrect
per services received. Recommend the board remove the lighting fee from the total
assessment amount.
3. Peter Corroon, Sorrento Car Wash
a. Property owner successfully contested their property valuation with the
county.
b. Requesting that the assessment amount be adjusted to take into account the
updated property value per the County valuation.
4. Matt Forsgren, NY Building
a. Questions on combining parcels, and individual assessments for each
associated parcel.
b. They do not have full occupancy in their property and feel that the
assessment is too large to responsibly pass down to the tenants and would
make it harder to keep them.
c. Requesting an adjustment on their assessment amount due to hardship.
UPDATED INFORMATION FOR THE BOE: Confirmed that currently there are 2 assessments
for properties under New York Limited ownership totaling $15,471.78. I will be reaching
out to property owner to confirm that this is the grand total amount, not the amount due
per property.
5. McKenna Tracy, Liberty Sky Apartments
a. Concerned about receiving two notices for two parcels for one property.
b. The property is a mutli-family unit with no commercial space.
c. Requesting that the assessment amount be adjusted in light of the property
classification.
UPDATED INFORMATION FOR THE BOE: Ryan Smith confirmed that due to an overlap of
hotel properties and apartment/condo properties listed under the same property type code
on the Salt Lake County Assessor LIR database, 6 parcel IDs across 2 owners were
erroneously identified as hotels, but consist multifamily complexes and associated resident
parking. Recommend the board vote to remove the properties from receiving the
assessment as currently residential multifamily properties are not included in the
assessment language.
6. Bruce Markosian, AAM Investments Limited
a. This property is on the very fringe of the CBIA-25 area, and thus receives
little to no benefit from the services provided. Their area is heavily industrial
and does not encourage any customer or commercial activity outside of
industrial business.
b. The assessment amount is very high and would drive out tenants if the cost
were to be passed on.
c. Feels that the assessment is of no value to their property or business.
d. Requesting that the boundary be changed to remove their property, and an
adjustment of their assessment amount.
UPDATED INFORMATION FOR THE BOE: I confirmed with Kristina Olivas of the Downtown
Ambassador’s program who confirmed that the Ambassador’s do not patrol this area, and
that this area is specifically not included in their area of service per their service area map
as part of the CBIA-22 contract.
INTERSTATE 15
REGENT ST
EDISON
ST
RICHARDS
ST
VIN
E
A
L
M
O
N
D
QUINCE ST ALMO
N
D 30 0 N
CANYON
ALAME DA
STANTON
BELD ON
GA
LE
ST
PACIF ICAVE
70
0 W
WA
SHINGTON
LACONI
A
HOYT PL
QU
INCE
COTTAGE
STRIN
GF
ELLOW
GR EGORY
WAY
NEDELMAR
POPLA
R
A R N O L D
DUBEI
CHATMAN
CANYON SIDE LN
OR PHEUM
ROAD
SPENCE
R CT
JACK SON AV
EMERIL AVE
ELDE
R CT
PIERP ON T
TEMPLE
PACIF IC AVPACIFIC
600 S
MOF
FAT
T CT
NORT H TEMPLE
PLUM ALLEY
PIERP ON T
MA RKET S T
SHEL
ME
RDINE
BLAI
R ST
IVERS
ON
CONWAY
SOCIAL H ALL
WOODBINE
BUTT
ERWORTH
MA
R
G
UER
IT
E
FLO
R
A
L
PLEA
SANT
TEMPLESOUTH
EAST
20
0
EDMONDSARGYLE
BLI
SS CT
RENDON CT
SEWARD
JACKSON AV
ECCLE S
EXCHANGE PL
GA LL IVAN AV
LOMA GR AY
EASTHILLSIDE AV
CAPITOL ST
RIO GRANDE
CT
OR CHARD P L
MORTE
NSEN
CT
WA
LL
50 N
SQUARE SQUARE
LIBRARYWASHINGTON
PIONEER
PARK
GATEWAY
TH
EDANSIE DR
40 0 S400 S
500 S500 S
20
0 W
40
0 W
50
0 W
300 W
200 W
600 S600 S
60
0 W MA
IN ST
30
0 E
400 E
40 0 S
10 0 S
30 0 S 300 S300 S
200 S
MA
IN ST
300 N
20 0 N
200 E
30
0 E
400 E
700 W
60
0 W
500 W
400 W
(HWY 8
9)
3RD AVE
B ST
C ST
D ST
A S
T
1ST AVE
600 W
500 W
200 N
300 N
(HWY 186 )
30 0 S
200 S
10 0 S
700 W
INTERSTATE 15
WEST
TEM
PLE
STATE
ST
STATE
ST
WEST
TEMPL
E
300 W
200 W
400 W
WEST
TEMPL
E
Sal t La ke CityCBIABoundary Ma p 4
50 51
299
375
80
255
131
222206
324
215
380
220
60
61
128
175
111
7
310 8
136
15
9
132
201
316
77
185
36
120
360
102
75
161
170
15
375
15
307
0
10
248
306
122
311
10
10
110
69
239
335
100
111
175
26
250
311
143
48 334322
341 342
360
79
360
51
185
10
163
150
144
334
320
149
321326
135
160165
75
262
149
330
357
319
155
328
260
163151
145
158156
159
323
155
268
159
338
327 331
225
18
149
124
160
325
122 118
270
120116
315
370
317
30
50
55
50
55
55
30
55
50
50
30
99
50
50
555550
5550
5045
55
50
44
44 44
99
9945
55
45
50
994450 65
505065
515151
51
5050
51
50
50
50
51 65
50
50
51
50
51
50
51 50
21
51
51 50
50 655051
200 S200 S
400 S400 S
300 S300 S
2
0
0
E
2
0
0
E
4
0
0
W
4
0
0
W
3
0
0
W
3
0
0
W
2
0
0
W
2
0
0
W
100 S100 S
M
a
i
n
S
t
M
a
i
n
S
t
St
a
t
e
S
t
St
a
t
e
S
t
South Temple St South Temple St
We
s
t
T
e
m
p
l
e
S
t
We
s
t
T
e
m
p
l
e
S
t
R
i
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
S
t
R
i
o
G
r
a
n
d
e
S
t
E
d
i
s
o
n
S
t
E
d
i
s
o
n
S
t
Re
g
e
n
t
S
t
Re
g
e
n
t
S
t
Exchange Pl Exchange Pl
Pierpont Ave Pierpont Ave
Pl
u
m
A
l
y
Pl
u
m
A
l
y
F
l
o
r
a
l
S
t
F
l
o
r
a
l
S
t
Social Hall Ave Social Hall Ave
Gallivan Ave Gallivan Ave
Po
p
l
a
r
C
t
Po
p
l
a
r
C
t
Wa
y
n
e
C
t
Wa
y
n
e
C
t
M
o
f
f
a
t
t
C
t
M
o
f
f
a
t
t
C
t
Ma
r
g
u
e
r
i
t
e
C
t
Ma
r
g
u
e
r
i
t
e
C
t
S
h
e
l
m
e
r
d
i
n
e
C
t
S
h
e
l
m
e
r
d
i
n
e
C
t
100 S100 S
Pierpont Ave Pierpont Ave
CBIA 16: Holiday Lighting Parcels (Preliminary)July 29, 2015Salt Lake City Geographic Information Systems OIncluded ParcelsHoliday Lighting Streets
Non-functioning lights